Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200900077 Review Comments 2009-09-224 " -rn - lA 1 IRG1 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 MEMORANDUM TO:Megan Yaniglos FROM:Margaret Maliszewski RE:SDP - 2009 -77: Flow Auto Minor Amendment DATE:September 22, 2009 1. Note 11 on Sheet S1 states that parking within the display parking lot on parcel 15E shall not be striped. This is a change from the approved plan, it conflicts with a condition of SP approval, and it is contrary to standard ARB requirements. The last sentence of Note 11 should be removed from the plan. 2. The plan shows the front row of parking on parcel 15D revised with an additional parking space and the row has been reoriented from angled to perpendicular. This differs from the plan approved with the SP. Additional comments may be provided regarding this proposed change after consultation with the Zoning Administrator. 3. The quantities of light fixtures A and W listed in the luminaire schedule on Sheet LL4 (4 and 6, respectively) do not match the quantities shown on the plan (6 and 7, respectively). 4. The island proposed to be striped located just west of the relocated dumpsters was previously a planting island with a tree. Deleting the tree is not appropriate. Revise the plan to include the planting island and the tree. 5. The area just east of the eastern entrance to the site was previously a planting island with a tree. The tree has been deleted and a planting island is no longer provided. The tree is a required Entrance Corridor tree. Revise the plan to include the planting island and the tree. 6. Ensure that all previously approved planting can be maintained with the changes proposed in the amendment. Ensure that the proposed amendment plan clearly identifies all proposed changes. cf I 1 111IIN v County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Megan Yaniglos, Senior Planner From: Amy Pflaum, Engineering Review Division: Current Development Date:September 29, 2009 Subject: SDP200900077, Flow Auto Minor Amendment The site plan minor amendment for the Flow Automotive, submitted on September 14, 2009, has been reviewed. Current Development Engineering can recommend approval once the following comments have been addressed: 1. Amendment Rev 1: The approved site plan showed curbing along the eastern property line abutting the parallel parking spaces. It is unclear if that curbing is still on the plan. 2. Amendment Rev 2: The parking in the front abutting Rte. 250 has been revised from angled to perpendicular. Perpendicular parking of 9 -feet in width requires a 24 -foot travelway, alternatively, a 20 -foot travelway requires abutting perpendicular parking to be 10 -feet in width. A waiver of this requirement must be requested and approved. [18- 4.12.16.c.1] 3. Amendment Rev 1: The approved site plan showed a stub -out (inter- parcel connection) to TMP 78 -14. It is unclear if this stub -out remains in this plan. 4. Amendment Rev 3: If the previously approved stub -out to TMP 78 -14 is required, the striped parking island in this area should be restored to raised concrete. 5. Amendment Rev 5: The minimum dimensions of a dumpster pad are 18' deep by 10" wide. The amended dumpster pad does not appear to meet this requirement. [18- 4.12.19] 6. Amendment Rev 5: It is difficult to determine how the new location of the dumpsters may affect traffic flow in the travelway to TMP 78 -14D because the curb that outlined the travelway on the approved site plan is not shown on this plan. 7. The stormwater facility labels on Sheet S -2 are identical in shape and size to the revision labels making it difficult to discern which are indicating revisions. Shading of the stormwater labels may be appropriate. 8. Amendment Rev 4: Please place revision bubbles around the amended Drainage Area acreages on Sheet DP -1. 9. Amendment Rev 4: Although Inlet 12 has been amended to a manhole, no grading amendment is being shown in this location. It is unclear how stounwater from the former Area Str. 12, which is sheet - flowing, will be captured by Inlet 12B. 10. Amendment Rev 4: The amended profile view of Str. 12 on Sheet DP -2 continues to show a raised curb situation. 11. Amendment Rev 4: Please provide an amended profile of Pipe 12A. 12. The profile of Str. 21 - Str. 19 was not included on the approved Sheet DP -2. Is this part of the amendment? 13. Amendment Rev 4: On Sheet DP -3 the rim elevation of Str. 6 has been amended, however, there has been no amendment of grading or curbing in its location. No change has been shown to the rim elevation of Str. 12, which is being amended from an inlet in a raised island to a manhole in the asphalt. Please clarify. 14. Amendment Rev 4: There are many unidentified differences between the Storm Sewer Computations and Drainage Descriptions on the approved Sheet DP -3 and the amended version. Please note and explain all differences. Once again, Str. 19 & 21 are on the amended sheet, but are not on the previously approved plan. 15. Amendment Rev 10: This could not be reviewed, although the previously approved Sheet S -5 is included, an amended version was not submitted.