The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200900030 Review Comments 2009-05-19Thz jefferi 7 .7:f 706 Forest St, Ste G Charlottesville VA 22903 575-022z4 TO.Surrrne Fiederiuk Planning Department Sou Repoit arlci Cue n. West Lakes Ciffiue Paik A ` I'S 1-011111M m co N. aimillip c ,, g , , tufty. IL at m wA ° 4‘41 lirek' m .Jt s ce ca APA iitt4 - ite, - tr , ,„ W 3.:a 5 } b.gi o o n ;:-.,, „.--, ' , H : ::!.'! , 4‘i - -:;', - A!!. a ..,:\mier:IL :ftir.c•,7'''' 1.‘ ' ',..'' - AV:•.*:4.4",' k,.., D A.Z.,,1:*".$:,;-40111 ,P0 . 4A1m CO 25 7400- ,',,-- 'c 6,' k . Illk -. :.-::;' co rn I ea O m H a k ga' coiFc,N ' 1" 44;-„:„ ' - OD CO4.o a,t te s,,%,,,,,\ '• i .....it'- 41 Q 4w ems Po£ +y, V . t...,„146414.;„ k. Y V - 4L -°--- .,4'r,' it s t. "41401t 0 • P ,,, 6- o if a. o m W e A A O V `o m m m ul vyt_y r e fib' a n 4 y' fig,y TA, - USDA United States intural Prepared by: Th Thas Jefferson Soil & Water Department of Resources Conservation District Agriculture Conservation 434 - 975 -0224 Service Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: Forest Lakes Office Park Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 2C Albemarle fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Albemarle is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, shallow, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is fine sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Elioak is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately slow. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 28C3 Elioak clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded Description Category: Virginia FOTG Elioak is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately slow. It has a low available water capacity and a moderate shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 34C Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Glenelg is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is U. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 88 Udorthents, loamy Description Category: Virginia FOTG No description available for Udorthents, loamy. Small Commercial Buildings - Dominant Condition Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 5/13/09 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 2C Albemarle fine sandy Very limited loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent Somewhat limited slopes 28C3 Elioak clay loam, 7 to 15 Very limited percent slopes, severely eroded 34C Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 Very limited percent slopes 88 Udorthents, loamy Not Rated Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 2C Albemarle fine sandy Not hydric loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent Not hydric slopes 28C3 Elioak clay loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes, severely eroded 34C Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 88 Udorthents, loamy Partially hydric Soil Shrink -Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 2C Albemarle fine sandy 1.5 loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Thomas Jefferson SWCD 2 5/13/09 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent 1.5 slopes 28C3 Elioak clay loam, 7 to 15 4.5 percent slopes, severely eroded 34C Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 88 Udorthents, loamy 0 Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 2C Albemarle fine sandy Moderate loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent Moderate slopes 28C3 Elioak clay loam, 7 to 15 Moderate percent slopes, severely eroded 34C Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 High percent slopes Thomas Jefferson SWCD 3 5/13/09 706 Forest St, Ste G Charlottesville VA 22903 Planning Department L.Su INepui c:ti ci i it R.JT LA She v wag h//_. 47D 47D 94C 94C 0 5 94 34 V8E,47D 65C tIV 11*r . 144.0, 11111111111111117 fa 47E O 65B L%96 65C ea o- OA 48E 271, b 48E fir,34ck E48 ilk/ Coeirittio...__,_276 r m 4 0 47D 39D 4111191411 p 47D 47D / 0 ::: : ,NY MOUNTAIN 48E l \ G j 34C. 34r> - C 34C/ 34 B ` s . 94C Q 278 be 9 A rJ srcb .dam t ,94C 1,0 94C D 34r,34D D47 39D g 8X2063 f 8 c.., A S.3a 34C B 65B C a 65C b 34B K W,34C 34D s t. , y, e , e' „.!.47D 27C 88 4C 3/1c, " IB 34D , d '34C 77 OO 94C h>278 28Q3 3 27C • 348 3 270 k t r 2 27C 28C3, S¢ .,, 196: ,I ° a 340 xt,, t 2 Ls 6B 2 C'34D e r 3A0 276 27C 27C z_______,27C 2"34D,34B-4--ED 3 D 34C 27C 27C lip :'ti 1p 36,7 '3, 6D 1 i i 4C 3 &? 10lo i T= e . ss 278 2D 34D 27C e- S c34E ,_, ----- C 4 D 14D : 47E rr r' 27D2C atQ 13D 27C D34 a' 4,„ k 88 10 3D 2p Y » . 2B 27C 2'B n i11134E39Ee i1u 34D 76 34D 39E .'j 34D 3E /29e 4F 21B a'..n r--\ USDA United States Natural Prepared by: Thdmas Jefferson Soil & Water Department of Resources Conservation DistrictAgricultureConservation434 - 975 -0224 Service Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: University Retirement Community Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 2C Albemarle fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Albemarle is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, shallow, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is fine sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 2D Albemarle fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Albemarle is a moderately steep to steep, shallow, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is fine sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Elioak is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately slow. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 27C Elioak loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Elioak is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately slow. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 28C3 Elioak clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded Description Category: Virginia FOTG Elioak is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately slow. It has a low available water capacity and a moderate shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capabilityclassificationis4e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 5/13/09 Map Unit: 34B Glenelg loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Glenelg is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is U. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 34C Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Glenelg is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is U. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 34D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Glenelg is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is U. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Glenelg is a steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7e. The Virginia soil management group is U. This soil is not hydric. Dwellings With Basements - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 2C Albemarle fine sandy Somewhat limited loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 2D Albemarle fine sandy Very limited loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent Not limited slopes 27C Elioak loam, 7 to 15 Somewhat limited percent slopes 28C3 Elioak clay loam, 7 to 15 Somewhat limited Thomas Jetterson SWCD 2 5/13/09 percent slopes, severely eroded 34B Glenelg loam, 2 to 7 Not limited percent slopes 34C Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 Somewhat limited percent slopes 34D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 Very limited percent slopes Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 2C Albemarle fine sandy Very limited loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 2D Albemarle fine sandy Very limited loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent Somewhat limited slopes 27C Elioak loam, 7 to 15 Somewhat limited percent slopes 28C3 Elioak clay loam, 7 to 15 Somewhat limited percent slopes, severely eroded 34B Glenelg loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 34C Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 Somewhat limited percent slopes 34D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 Very limited percent slopes Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 2C Albemarle fine sandy Not hydric loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 2D Albemarle fine sandy Not hydric Thomas Jefferson SWCD 3 5/13/09 loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent Not hydric slopes 27C Elioak loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 28C3 Elioak clay loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes, severely eroded 34B Glenelg loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent slopes 34C Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 34D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 Not hydric percent slopes Soil Shrink - Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 2C Albemarle fine sandy 1.5 loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 2D Albemarle fine sandy 1.5 loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent 1.5 slopes 27C Elioak loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 28C3 Elioak clay loam, 7 to 15 4.5 percent slopes, severely eroded 34B Glenelg loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 34C Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 34D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 1.5 percent slopes 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 1.5 percent slopes Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Thomas Jefferson SWCD 4 5/13/09 Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating2CAlbemarlefinesandyModerate loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 2D Albemarle fine sandy Moderate loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent Moderate slopes 27C Elioak loam, 7 to 15 Moderate percent slopes 28C3 Elioak clay loam, 7 to 15 Moderate percent slopes, severely eroded 34B Glenelg loam, 2 to 7 High percent slopes 34C Glenelg loam, 7 to 15 High percent slopes 34D Glenelg loam, 15 to 25 High percent slopes 34E Glenelg loam, 25 to 45 High percent slopes l'homas Jefferson SWCD 5 5/13/09 pF aL&4 E S COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 May 20, 2009 To: Brian Smith via email: bpspe@embargmail.com CC: Benton Downer via email: benton@downerandassociates.com RE: SDP2009 -30 Forest Lakes Office Park - Major Dear Sir: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Planning (E911) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Historic Preservation) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Water Protection) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Health Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by June 1, 2009. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Summer Frederick Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development pFALe RGIl P County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Brian Smith via email: bpspe @embargmail.com From: Summer Frederick, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date:August 20, 2008 Subject: SDP2008 -115 Forest Lakes Office Park - Final The Planner /Engineer for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. SP94 -016] Established side setbacks are fifteen (15) feet. The southwest corner of the building seems to be located closer to the property boundary than fifteen (15) feet. Please correct. 2. SP94 -016, condition (d)] Please provide evidence of a walkway to connect the existing walkways adjacent to the lake to the shopping area. 3. A parking modification must be approved by the Zoning Administrator in order to allow for current number of provided spaces. Such a request is currently under review. 4. Sec. 18- 32.6.6(i)] Please provide a landscape plan meeting requirements of Sec. 18- 32.7.9. Such a plan is to include enough detail to allow for review with accordance to SP94 -016 condition (b) and (c). 5. Sec. 18- 32.6.6(j)] If any lighting fixtures in excess of 3,000 lumens are to be located on site, please provide a lighting plan meeting all requirements of this section.l t‘ ,+ I J icp Eti« S Please contact Summer Frederick at the Dep of Community Development 296- 5832 ext. 3565 for further information. l _1(k t' lk I t I 1 Serv Authr TO: Summer Frederick FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer DATE: May 11, 2009 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Forest Lakes Office Park -Major SDP200900030 TM 46B4 -7A The below checked items apply to this site. X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2. A 6 inch water line is located on site. X 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located 60' distant from this site plan, is 3,765 Gpm + at 20 psi residual. X 4. An 18 inch sewer line is located approximately 200'distant. 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7.and plans are currently under review. 8.and plans have been received and approved. 9. No plans are required. X 10. Final water plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may /may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections. 13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. Comments: Detail the sequence of events for the hydrant relocation. Show plan and profile. Provide a plumbing fixture count to size the meter. Backflow prevention is required. The water line that the applicant is proposing to revise has not been dedicated to the ACSA. The water meter for the existing medical office building is offsite and the service line crosses the subject property. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations water line size waterline locations sewer line size 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698 www.serviceauthoriy.org fi COMMONWEALTH o f VIRQINIAA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 DAVID S. EKERN, P.E. COMMISSIONER May 20` 2009 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments May 21 , 2009 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT' s comments on the Site Plans for the May 21 2009 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP - 2006 - 00041 Briarwood Phase 1A - 1, 1B - 1, 8 (Elizabeth Marotta) 1. Engineering comments were provided by VDOT on 4 -23 -09 for the additional phase of the project. SDP - 2009 - 00030 Forest Lakes Office Park - Major (Summer Frederick) 1. No comments SDP - 2009 - 00031 Collins Medical Center - Preliminary (Gerald Gatobu) 1. Final plans need to show the proposed entrance profile. 2. Final plan needs to show details for CG -6, CG-11, and CG -12B and detectable warning. 3. A Land Use Permit will be required for construction within the public road right of way. SDP - 2009 -00033 University Village Retirement Community(Phase I) Summer Frederick 1. The proposed connection to Route 29 needs to be a minimum of 510 feet from the existing intersection or line up with the intersection at the signal. WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING 2. This site plan exceeds the threshold to require a Chapter 527 Traffic Impact Analysis. 3. The proposed road must provide a connection to the existing Boulders Road to meet the connectivity requirements of SSAR's, 24VAC 30 -92. Without the connection the road may not be eligible for acceptance into the State Secondary System of Highways. 4. The CG -12 detail needs to be updated and show the proper detectable warning. 5. The proposed Functional Classification needs to be indicated on the plan. 6. If the connection is made to Boulders Road, additional traffic will need to be shown to properly determine the design speed and pavement structural section of the road. 7. Provide the horizontal alignment data on the roads. 8. Street design data on sheet R -4 lists University Village Road but the plans show University Village Dr. Is this the same road? 9. The sight distance on University Village Dr. / Rd. need to be based on the correct design speed on the road. 10. Pavement design on University Village Dr. needs to be designed in accordance with the AASHTO method if this is designed as a collector road. 11. Storm sewer pipes need to be as perpendicular as possible to the centerline of the road and cannot exceed 45 degrees. 12. Street Trees on University Village Dr. need to be located outside of the clear zone of the road if this road is to be classified as a collector. SDP - 2009 -00034 Martha Jefferson Outpatient Care Center (Proffit) -Major (Gerald Gatobu) 1. It appears that the parking and detention facility for this site is in conflict with a previous plan for the widening of Proffit Road and the construction of a roundabout at this intersection. The road plan indicates that there has been a dedication of right of way for the road widening and intersection improvement. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434 - 293 -0011 WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING oar COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 804) 296 -5823 August 1, 1994 Health Services Foundation ATTN: Gary Lowe 2955 Ivy Road Charlottesville, VA 22903 RE: SP -94 -16 Health Services Foundation Tax Map 46B4, Parcel 7 Dear Mr. Lowe: The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on July 20,1994, approved the above -noted request for professional offices on 5.8 acres zoned R -15. Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions: 1.Compliance with the provisions of Section 21.0; 2.Provision of landscaping adjacent to Timberwood Boulevard consistent with that provided on Timberwood Boulevard in the developed commercial area; 3.Provision of vegetative screening designed to minimize visibility of the site from the Arbor Lake Townhomes; 4.Provision of a walkway to connect the existing walkways adjacent to the lake to the shopping area. J r Page 2 August 1, 1994 If you have any questions or comments regarding the above -noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, V. Wayne Cilimberg Director of Planning & Community Development VWC /jcw cc: Forest Lakes Associates Amelia McCulley Jo Higgins MIL Application #:SDP200900030 Short Review Comr... nts Project Name:'Forest Lakes Office Park - Major Major Amendment Date Completed:05/11/2009 Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911 Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: I OBJECTION. Date Completed:05/04/2009 Reviewer:James Barber Fire Rescue Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Must comply with the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Approval is subject to field inspection and verification. Date Completed: Reviewer:Judith Wiegand Planning Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments: 1Long - range planning staff has reviewed this major amendment for compliance with the County's Comprehensive Plan, including the Neighborhood Model. The proposed one -story building does comply with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation. Staff appreciates the way the proposed building will create a line of building fronts along Timberwood Blvd. and the fact that the parking is mostly relegated. Staff has the following additional improvements to recommend: 1. Extend the sidewalk along the fuill frontage of Timberwood Blvd. that is owned by the applicant. 2. Moving the newly striped parking lot to another part of the property would leave room for another building on the other side of the existing building. 13. If possible, move the handicapped parking spaces closer to the buiidling. Date Completed:05/12/2009 Reviewer:Max Greene Engineer Z &CD Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: 1—Topography will be visually field verified by the designer within the last year. [18- 32.6.6, 14 -302, Policy for date] Plan appears to require easements across parcel 7C . (LE. water, sewer, and vehicle access) Loading space requirements? Dumpster pad details are required. Sidewalks adjacent to park will be 6' wide (exclusive of curb), or bumper blocks will be provided. Erosion and sediment control plan is required for disturbances over 10,000 square feet. Please refer to the Albemarle County Design Standards checklist for clarification of requirements for approval. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Tuesday, May 12, 2009