The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200900019 Review Comments 2009-04-1001, ALg4:1 7C 1 i l a ILe_d 1910o 1 IJilJlITr; Ikc;tN COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 Mclntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 April 10, 2009 Steve Melton 195 Riverbend Drive Charlottesville VA 22911 RE: SDP- 2009 -19 Lacy Mechanical Major Amendment Dear Sir: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer)- no objection Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner)- no objection Albemarle County Division of Planning (E911)- no objection Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Department of Inspections Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered fmal. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by April 27, 2009. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional infoiniation. Sincerely, Elizabeth M. Marot a Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development Application #: r SDP200900019 jhort Review Comments Project Name: Lacy Mechanical Inc - Major 1 [Major Amendment j Date Completed:04/08/2009 Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911 Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: NO OBJECTION. Date Completed:04/02/2009 Reviewer:Elizabeth Marotta CommDev- Current Development Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: After conducting a site visit to confirm the area is existing impervious, and checking with inspections to make sure they do not have any outstanding violations, Planning Z &CD does not object to this request. The additional building will not increase impervious or trigger the need for additional parking or landscaping, and, the site is adjacent to another LI property so there are no setback or zoning issues. Engineering will address any stormwater /grading issues. Date Completed:04/06/2009 Reviewer:James Barber Fire Rescue Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Verify adequate fire flow is available. Approval is subject to field inspection and verification. Date Completed:04/03/2009 Reviewer:John Paul Diez Engineer Z &CD Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: After visiting the site, we have confirmd that there are no Erosion & Sediment COntrol or Stormwater Management issues. No E &S is required since the proposed site will disturb less than 10,000 SF. The existing bio- filter, which has experienced recent maintenance, will handle any adjustment in stormwater resulting from the negligible change in impervious area as existing gravel is replaced by the building addition. SRC 4/16/09 Date Completed:04/06/2009 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Based on plans dated March 23, 2009. Note: Due to the proximity of the new building to the property line ( <10'), the east wall of the building must be of 1 -hour firerated construction. Daae: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Friday. April 10. 2009 Service AuthIrrity TO: Elizabeth Marotta FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer DATE: April 10, 2009 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Lacy Mechanical Inc. SDP200900019 TM 77 -40P The below checked items apply to this site. X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2. An 8 inch water line is located approximately 180'distant. 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at 20 psi residual. X 4. An 8 inch sewer line is located approximately 170 distant. 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7.and plans are currently under review. 8.and plans have been received and approved. X 9. No plans are required. 10. Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may /may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections. 13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. Comments: Provide a total plumbing fixture count to determine adequate meter size. Backflow prevention is required. Show existing and proposed water and sewer connections The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations water line size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698 www.serviceauthoriy.org n 1-0 kApUor (z2Leoi - 1 - 7) C LFA Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District April 24, 2009 706 Forest St, Ste G Charlottesville, VA 22903 975-0224 TO:Eligabeth Marotta Planning Department RE:Soils Report and Comments for: Lacy Mechanical Z3^I It 3B7IC13 71C 4/D %NW 71 D 23B Pantops 23B v ...41;r: 1 ^,C1 1D/ t 71C 71Q11 .: '` t 4 I I 1 - ,1_ ,...2111 4 710,.S '.. , r, 71C s F ilirrjillIPIPP\ i r' 720 x5( Ci b'72D3 72C3.88 Q x 10 5 +6 272C 7:3D fi zsc to 58D 558 130 P Ill MY 8d.71D 11 egE e 4,- __..... e 58 0 71C6 77 i 798 I 83 7 1D A.. - t CHFSAPE_ •A .C 1 13E C 59E f 83 12E MONIF ti.L 71E v 7 MC wrAli j 590 71D L2D3 7 B F'Aith X19 A f34.3 7 23B ry Q l"i 711 13E ,, 71D i C ipr/1 Ili Jefferson 7203 1 59DAA Tomb l Co 1 ,2c _ C J 1D 7ID C .7 4 71D-2E3 71C 58D 59E 71C 30 73D G 71p 7 1 72C3 13E v 7263. t 72 i72D3 90B re:''i 7\i j 2C358E798 qvv 7 f f 2386,water v vEC qC1tiJle'h 23B t er$00 R- r 79 x . 13E 1.ittalfl 131 89:1111/°71l P9 - -- it 586, 71D 71D MoD 79B ( 1 SCALE 1:15 8000Feet40003000200010000 G i i 1000 Meters 800 600 400 200 0 L" 1 I - - — ALBEMARLE COUNTY VIF USDA United States Natural Prepared by: Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Department of Resources Conservation District Agriculture Conservation 434 - 975 -0224 Service Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: Lacy Mechanical Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 10 Buncombe loamy sand Description Category: Virginia FOTG Buncombe is a nearly level to gently sloping, very deep, excessively drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loamy sand about 10 inches thick. The surface layer has a low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is rapid. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is frequently flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 5w. The Virginia soil management group is II. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 12D Catoctin silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Catoctin is a moderately steep to steep, moderately deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Catoctin is a steep, moderately deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 13D Catoctin very stony silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Catoctin is a moderately steep to steep, moderately deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7s. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Davidson is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 4 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 4/27/09 not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Davidson is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer isclayloamabout4inchesthick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil isnotfloodedandisnotponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 58D Myersville silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Myersville is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loamabout7inchesthick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability ismoderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capabilityclassificationis4e. The Virginia soil management group is D. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clayloamabout6inchesthick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil isnotfloodedandisnotponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clayloamabout6inchesthick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil isnotfloodedandisnotponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about6inchesthick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability ismoderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capabilityclassificationis6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 83 Toccoa fine sandy loam Description Category: Virginia FOTG Toccoa is a nearly level to gently sloping, very deep, moderately well drained soil. Typically the surface layer isfinesandyloamabout9inchesthick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. Theslowestpermeabilityismoderatelyrapid. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is occasionally flooded and is not ponded. The top of the seasonal high water table is at 45inches. The land capability classification is 2w. The Virginia soil management group is 11. This soil is not hydric. Thomas Jetterson SWCD 2 4/27/09 Map Unit: 88 Udorthents, loamy Description Category: Virginia FOTG No description available for Udorthents, loamy. Small Commercial Buildings - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 10 Buncombe loamy sand Very limited I2D Catoctin silt loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 Very limited percent slopes 13D Catoctin very stony silt Very limited loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to Very limited 15 percent slopes 58D Myersville silt loam, 15 to Very limited 25 percent slopes 7I B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Very limited percent slopes 71 D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes 83 Toccoa fine sandy loam Very limited 88 Udorthents, loamy Not Rated Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 10 Buncombe loamy sand Partially hydric 12D Catoctin silt loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 Not hydric percent slopes 13D Catoctin very stony silt Not hydric loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent slopes Thomas Jetterson SWCD 3 4/27/09 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to Not hydric 15 percent slopes 58D Myersville silt loam, 15 to Not hydric 25 percent slopes 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes 83 Toccoa fine sandy loam Partially hydric 88 Udorthents, loamy Partially hydric Soil Shrink -Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 10 Buncombe loamy sand 1.5 12D Catoctin silt loam, 15 to 25 1.5 percent slopes I2E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 1.5 percent slopes 13D Catoctin very stony silt 1.5 loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to 1.5 15 percent slopes 58D Myersville silt loam, 15 to 1.5 25 percent slopes 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 1.5 percent slopes 83 Toccoa fine sandy loam 1.5 88 Udorthents, loamy 0 Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Thomas Jetterson SWCD 4 4/27/09 Symbol Soil Name Rating 10 Buncombe loamy sand Moderate 12D Catoctin silt loam, 15 to 25 Moderate percent slopes 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 Moderate percent slopes I3D Catoctin very stony silt Moderate loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 Moderate percent slopes 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to Moderate 15 percent slopes 58D Myersville silt loam, 15 to Moderate 25 percent slopes 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 Moderate percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Moderate percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Moderate percent slopes 83 Toccoa fine sandy loam Moderate Corrosion Steel - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 10 Buncombe loamy sand Low 12D Catoctin silt loam, 15 to 25 High percent slopes 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 High percent slopes 13D Catoctin very stony silt High loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 High percent slopes 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to High 15 percent slopes 58D Myersville silt loam, 15 to Moderate 25 percent slopes 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 High percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 High percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 High percent slopes 83 Toccoa fine sandy loam Low Thomas Jefferson SWCD 5 4/27/09