Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201600030 Staff Report 2016-04-12ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project #/Name ARE-2016-30: Spring Hill Village Review Type Preliminary Review of a Site Plan and Architecture Parcel Identification 09000000002800 Location 1776 Scottsville Road, on the west side of Rt. 20, and east of Avon Street Extended (Rt. 742), between Arden Drive and Stony Creek Drive Zoned Neighborhood Model District (NMD)/Entrance Corridor (EC) Owner/Applicant Spring Hill Land Development LLC/Vito Cetta Magisterial District Scottsville Proposal To establish a mixed -use development on 13 acres, including attached and detached dwelling units. Architectural designs for Blocks C and E are proposed. Context The subject parcel fronts on two Entrance Corridors. On Rt. 20, Parham Construction is located to the north/east of the site. Single family residences are located along this stretch of the Rt. 20 Entrance Corridor. The east side of Rt. 20 is designated Rural Areas. There is a mix of development on Avon Street Extended, including industrial, residential and institutional. Visibility The proposed development is expected to be clearly visible from both Entrance Corridors. The finished floor elevations of the townhouses adjacent to Avon Street are well below the level of the street. At the north end, only the roofs will rise above street level. At the south end, the upper stories and roofs rise above street level. The rows of units in Block C are oriented parallel to Rt. 20. The side elevation of Unite 41 will be visible. The front elevations of the Block C units will have some visibility from the EC, but they would be viewed at an angle, at a distance, and through landscaping, so the view will be filtered. The view of the rear elevations will be filtered by the staggered row of trees to be planted along the north property line. ARB Meeting Date April 18, 2016 Staff Contact Margaret Maliszewski PROJECT HISTORY A rezoning for this property was approved in October of 2014. The ARB reviewed an Initial Site Plan for this development on January 21, 2016. The action letter from that meeting is included as Attachment A to this report. Outstanding issues from that review are also listed in the Analysis table, below. ANALYSIS The Initial Site Plan review was limited to site plan issues. The current review is intended primarily to address the architectural design of the residential units proposed for Blocks C and E. Unresolved site plan issues from the Initial Plan review have been carried forward in the following analysis. REF GUIDELINE 1/21/2016 INITIAL PLAN CURRENT ISSUE RECOMMENDATION REVIEW COMMENTS Structure design 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the Note for future submittals Architectural designs for townhouse Blocks C and E have Note for future submittals designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that new development that the Block A building been submitted for review. (Note that the single family that the Block A building within the corridors reflects the traditional architecture of the area. will need to address EC detached residences in the development do not require will need to address EC Therefore, it is the purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, Guidelines requirements for ARB review.) Block C is located along the northern Guidelines requirements that proposed development within the designated Entrance scale, proportion, massing, property line. Block E is located adjacent to Avon Street. for scale, proportion, Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the significant detailing, lack of blankness, massing, detailing, lack historical landmarks, buildings, and structures of the Charlottesville etc. A "back of building" Blocks A and B, identified as "site for future commercial, of blankness, etc. A and Albemarle area, and to promote orderly and attractive appearance will not be office, and/or residential," constitute future phases of "back of building" development within these corridors. Applicants should note that appropriate for elevations development. It will be particularly important for the Block appearance will not be replication of historic structures is neither required nor desired. visible from Rt. 20. A building to adequately address EC Guidelines requirements for scale, proportion, massing, detailing, lack appropriate for elevations visible from Rt. 20. 2 Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, Remove the footprints of of blankness, etc. A "back of building" appearance will not land, and vegetation. In order to accomplish the integration of future phase buildings from be appropriate for elevations visible from Rt. 20. The buildings, land, and vegetation characteristic of these sites, the the plan. footprints of the Block A and B buildings have been Guidelines require attention to four primary factors: compatibility removed from the site plan, as requested. with significant historic sites in the area; the character of the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and landscaping. 3 New structures and substantial additions to existing structures The proposed architectural design for Blocks C and E None. should respect the traditions of the architecture of historically incorporates standard residential building forms and details significant buildings in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area. that are found in the area, including gabled roofs, fanlights, Photographs of historic buildings in the area, as well as drawings of bay windows, dormers, and lap siding. architectural features, which provide important examples of this tradition are contained in Appendix A. 4 The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as well as special functional requirements. 5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a The applicant has indicated that the proposed design is None. pattern of compatible architectural characteristics throughout the similar to the residential units constructed in Avon Park, Entrance Corridor in order to achieve unity and coherence. which is located across Avon Street. Building designs should demonstrate sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful balance between harmonizing new development with the existing character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area. 9 Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, Proposed gabled roofs, double -hung windows with None. materials, colors and textures should be compatible with the forms shutters, fanlights, bay windows, dormers, lap siding and and features of the significant historic buildings in the area, shingle roofs are compatible with features of the historic exemplified by (but not limited to) the buildings described in buildings in the County. The scale and proportions of the Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of units appear compatible with traditional buildings of this compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms which type. may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these guidelines. 10 Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of The applicant has indicated that the proposed design is None. buildings. similar to the residential units constructed in Avon Park, which is located across Avon Street. 11 The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale The width of the units, the placement of doors and None. should be integral to the building and site design. windows, the use of lap siding, the stepping with the topography and the slight projection of units forward and back help establish human scale. 12 Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use The townhouses have some options in window, door and None. forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole. paint colors, but the overall appearance is coordinated and cohesive. 13 Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design Blankness is not an issue with the proposed designs. None. should be relieved using design detail or vegetation, or both. 14 Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices No physical connecting devices are proposed. Materials, None. should be used to unify groups of buildings within a development. colors, and building forms will be relied upon to establish unity in the development. 15 Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to No trademark buildings are anticipated. None. meet the requirements of the Guidelines. 16 Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or The note will be needed on the architectural drawings. Add the standard window highly reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should glass note to the meet the following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall architectural drawings. not drop below 4001o. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 3001o. Specifications on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application for final review. Accessory structures and equipment 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the A screening fence detail The townhouses located closest to the ECs (including those A screening fence detail overall plan of development and shall, to the extent possible, be indicating size, material and in future Block A) have their rear elevations facing the indicating size, material compatible with the building designs used on the site. color is needed in the plan. Vinyl with a shiny surface is ECs. Consequently, standard residential scale accessory structures and equipment are expected to be located in the and color is needed in the plan. Vinyl with a shiny 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will not an appropriate material rear yards and to have some visibility from the ECs. Trees surface is not an still have a negative visual impact on the Entrance Corridor street, for this fence. along the EC will help break up the view of the equipment appropriate material for screening should be provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, as seen from the EC, but will not likely completely this fence. b. Service areas, eliminate visibility. Visibility and treatment of equipment c. Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, f. associated with the future commercial/office building in the Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor northeast corner of the development will be assessed when wire, and similar security fencing devices. that future phase is submitted for review. 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of: a. A 6'-tall screening fence is proposed along the south Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing. property line. A fence detail indicating size, material and color is needed in the plan. Vinyl with a shiny surface is not an appropriate material for this fence. 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to None. Underground stormwater facilities are located at Main Park See landscape comments. fit into the natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When and adjacent to Rt. 20, between Block B and the EC. visible from the Entrance Corridor street, these features must be fully Typically, trees cannot be planted on top of these integrated into the landscape. They should not have the appearance of underground facilities, so the EC frontage planting will be engineered features. even more important. 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the Add the standard mechanical The note does not appear on the plan, but is needed. Add the standard architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the equipment note to both the mechanical equipment Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." site and architectural plans. note to both the site and architectural plans. Lighting None at this time. No lighting is shown at this time. None at this time. Landscaping 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are Revise the landscape plan to The landscape plan has been revised to key the trees on the Revise the plant schedule intended to reflect the landscaping characteristic of many of the key the trees on the plan to plan to the plant schedule. EC trees are proposed at 31/2" to identify all proposed area's significant historic sites which is characterized by large the plant schedule. caliper at planting, spaced approximately 35' on center, plants by species. shade trees and lawns. Landscaping should promote visual order with interspersed ornamentals. Species have not yet been within the Entrance Corridor and help to integrate buildings into the Revise the spacing of large identified. Revise the plans to existing environment of the corridor. shade trees along the ECs to no greater than 35' on Underground utility lines are shown along both ECs. Trees clearly show all utility lines with their associated 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials that share similar center. are shown approximately 5' from the lines. No easements easements. Provide characteristics. Such common elements allow for more flexibility in associated with these lines are shown on the plan, but sufficient planting area, the design of structures because common landscape features will Intersperse ornamental trees easement holders typically require trees to be at least 10' free of utilities and help to harmonize the appearance of development as seen from the among the large shade trees from the utility line. Several other trees appear to be easements, along both street upon which the Corridor is centered. that are proposed along the ECs. located too close to pipes or in easements. ECs. Provide documentation from 32 Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the following: Work is proposed on Rt. 20 beyond the subject parcel for easement holders that a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Revise the plans to clearly road improvements and extension of the sewer line. In at there is no objection to Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 3%2 inches caliper show all utility lines with least one location (TMP 90-27), it appears that trees will be the planting as proposed. (measured 6 inches above the ground) and should be of a plant their associated easements. removed with proposed grading. The final appearance of species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least Provide sufficient planting the Rt. 20 frontage beyond the subject parcel following Clarify the extent of tree every 35 feet on center. area, free of utilities and road and utility work is unclear. removal and tree b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should easements, along both ECs. replacement planned with be interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. off -site work along the The ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large Clarify the extent of tree ECs. Show how an shade trees. They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less removal and tree appropriate appearance regular spacing pattern. replacement planned with for the EC will be c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or off -site work along the ECs. maintained. low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Show how an appropriate Entrance Corridor street. appearance for the EC will d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing be maintained. plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: Revise the landscape plan to Trees are shown along interior roads. The interior road None. a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such key the trees on the plan to trees are spaced more or less 40' on center. trees should be at least 2'/2 inches caliper (measured six inches the plant schedule. above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 40 feet on center. Revise the landscape plan to space the interior road trees no greater than 40' apart. Show how an appropriate appearance for the EC will be maintained. 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: None. Sidewalks are shown along the interior roads and the ECs. None. a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian The street trees double as pedestrian -way trees. ways. Such trees should be at least 2%2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 25 feet on center. 35 Landscaping of parking areas: Revise the landscape plan to One parking lot is proposed in the development. It is Provide 21/2" caliper large a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located key the trees on the plan to located on the north/west side of Block A and contains 47 trees, spaced 40' on 40 feet on center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking the plant schedule. spaces aligned along Road C. The lot requires 5 interior center, at the perimeter of areas at the rate of one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided trees. One tree is provided in a tree island near the center of the parking lot located at and should be evenly distributed throughout the interior of the Provide shrubs, minimum the lot on the west side. Trees are also proposed at two of Road C. Also provide 5 parking area. 24" high at planting, on the the four corners of the lot. Perimeter trees are provided on interior parking lot trees b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2%2 south side of the parking lot the north/west side. Trees previously shown at the other at 2%2" caliper. inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be at Road C, to screen the two corners, along the east perimeter, and at the interior evenly spaced; and should be of a species common to the area. parked cars as viewed from have been removed. Provide shrubs, minimum Such trees should be planted in planters or medians sufficiently the EC. 24" high at planting, on large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected by No shrubs are proposed around the parking lot. Shrubs on the south side of the curbing. the south side of the parking lot would help screen the parking lot at Road C, to c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking parked cars as viewed from the EC until such time as the screen the parked cars as area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure townhouses are completed. viewed from the EC. 24 inches in height. 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: Adjust the locations of trees The elevations of the townhouses proposed in Blocks C and None. a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of south of south of lots 42-53 E have a sufficient level of detail and do not appear to long buildings as necessary to soften the appearance of exterior to remain outside of the require additional landscaping to soften the appearance. walls. The spacing, size, and type of such trees or vegetation should sewer easement. be determined by the length, height, and blankness of such walls. An irregular row of trees is proposed south of the b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other townhouses in Block A. These trees, and those along the structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive perimeter of the Road C parking lot, those around Main thru" windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at Park, the street trees, and the trees on the east side of the least 24 inches in height. parcel will help integrate the buildings of the development into the surroundings and soften the overall appearance. The trees to be located south of the townhouses in Block A have been moved out of the sewer easement. 37 Plant species: None at this time. The plant schedule does not identify species at this time. Revise the plant schedule a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff based to identify all proposed upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended plants by species. Species List and Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D). 38 Plant health: Add the standard plant The note does not appear on the plan, but is needed. Add the standard plant The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All site health note to the plan. health note to the plan. plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of theplant." Development pattern The ARB is supportive of Blocks A and B are identified as "site for future None at this time. mixed uses/commercial uses commercial, office, and/or residential". along the Entrance Corridor. 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural None. Three groups of townhouses are situated along the Avon None at this time. landscape and should contribute to the creation of an organized Street corridor. The backs of these units face the street. One development plan. This may be accomplished, to the extent group is oriented parallel to the street; the others are not. practical, by preserving the trees and rolling terrain typical of the The arrangement of the townhouse blocks, together with area; planting new trees along streets and pedestrian ways and the landscaping and pocket park that is proposed between choosing species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that the buildings and the street, help establish an acceptable any grading will blend into the surrounding topography thereby presentation to the street. creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys which may be located The footprints of the Block A and B buildings along the Rt. on the site and integrating these features into the design of 20 EC have been removed from the site plan, as requested. surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and (These buildings are designated as a future phase.) height to a scale that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor. 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor street and to other development within the corridor should be as follows: a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site. b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be parallel to the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street. c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems. d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas on and around the site. Site Grading 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to Provide material and color The grade of this site drops significantly from Avon Street Provide material and surrounding conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by samples for the retaining down to Rt. 20. Avon Street in the vicinity of the project color samples for the shaping the terrain through the use of smooth, rounded land forms walls. Indicate material and area ranges from an elevation of approximately 640' at the retaining walls. Indicate that blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are color on the site plan. east to 630' at the west. Route 20 in the vicinity of the material and color on the generally unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan shall project area ranges from an elevation of 530' at the east to site plan. be rounded with a ten foot minimum radius where they meet the 550' at the west. Retaining walls are used in several adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than locations to accommodate the proposed development of the engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, property. Two retaining walls are located close to Avon when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the Street. Others are located between rows of buildings, on the landscape. east side of the development, and south of Main Park. The walls do not exceed 6' in height. Some of the walls will be visible from the Rt. 20 EC. Material and color samples are needed. In many cases, proposed contours are not rounded where they meet the adjacent condition at the east and west property lines. Trees are proposed all along the east and west property lines, and should help soften this view. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line None. Much of the existing site is wooded, but the plan shows no None. of any trees or other existing features designated for preservation in trees to remain. the final Certificate of Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment control plans. 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion of the development of the site. 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment within this area. 44 Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage Revise the plan to show a Underground stormwater facilities are located at Main Park Revise the plan to show a patterns) should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent temporary landscape and adjacent to Rt. 20, just south of the townhouses in temporary landscape possible. treatment for the sediment Block A. Typically, trees cannot be planted on top of these treatment for the basin located at the northeast underground facilities. sediment basin located at corner of the property to the northeast corner of establish an appropriate The Existing Conditions plan shows a sediment basin at the the property to establish appearance for the EC. northeast corner of the property, at Route 20, to be used an appropriate during construction. It is likely that the basin will have the appearance for the EC. Clarify phasing on the plan, appearance of a construction -related engineering feature, including related landscape not an integrated landscape feature, during construction. If Clarify phasing on the development. construction extends over a long time period, a temporary plan, including related landscape treatment would be appropriate. landscape development. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. Anticipated visibility and views 2. The architectural design of the townhouses proposed for Blocks C and E 3. The proposed colors for the townhouses Staff offers the following comments on the proposal: 1. Note for future submittals that the Block A building will need to address EC Guidelines requirements for scale, proportion, massing, detailing, lack of blankness, etc. A "back of building" appearance will not be appropriate for elevations visible from Rt. 20. 2. Add the standard window glass note to the architectural drawings. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40% Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 3091o. Specifications on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application for final review. 3. A screening fence detail indicating size, material and color is needed in the plan. Vinyl with a shiny surface is not an appropriate material for this fence. 4. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to both the site and architectural plans. "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." 5. Revise the plant schedule to identify all proposed plants by species. 6. Revise the plans to clearly show all utility lines with their associated easements. Provide sufficient planting area, free of utilities and easements, along both ECs. Provide documentation from easement holders that there is no objection to the planting as proposed. 7. Clarify the extent of tree removal and tree replacement planned with off -site work along the ECs. Show how an appropriate appearance for the EC will be maintained. 8. Provide 2'/2" caliper large trees, spaced 40' on center, at the perimeter of the parking lot located at Road C. Also provide 5 interior parking lot trees at 2'/s" caliper. 9. Provide shrubs, minimum 24" high at planting, on the south side of the parking lot at Road C, to screen the parked cars as viewed from the EC. 10. Revise the plant schedule to identify all proposed plants by species. 11. Add the standard plant health note to the plan. 12. "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." 13. Provide material and color samples for the retaining walls. Indicate material and color on the site plan. 14. Revise the plan to show a temporary landscape treatment for the sediment basin located at the northeast corner of the property to establish an appropriate appearance for the EC. 15. Clarify phasing on the plan, including related landscape development. This report is based on the following submittal items: Sheet # Drawing Name Drawing Date 1 Cover 3-7-16 2 Notes 3-7-16 3 Existing Conditions 3-7-16 4 Rezoning Application/Block Plan 3-7-16 5 Site Layout Plan 3-7-16 6 Site Layout Plan 3-7-16 7 Site Landscape Plan 3-7-16 8 Site Landscape Plan 3-7-16 9 Landscape Data 3-7-16 10 Landscape Details 3-7-16 -I Development Concept Plan (color 8'/2 xl 1) - 1 Elevations 2-16-16 2 Architectural site plan and building massing/elevations at Avon Street 2-16-16 Materials sample board: charcoal black composition shingles; white solid vinyl windows, trim; Hardiplank siding: painted Benjamin Moore CW-485, 305, 420, 125, 640 10 ATTACHMENT A Ar F r. ir. rttytinrf. COL'VTF OF _ LBE1LIKU Dep artm eat o£ Co-nrm¢¢i�- Dearelopme¢t 401 1fe1¢dra Road, North 111.g Ciarto-ren-filler Civginia 22902-4996 Pk— (434) 296- 932 Fu (434) 972-4126 January 29, 2010 Alan Franklin Spring Hill Land Developmenl LLC 427 Cranberry Ln Crozet, VA M32 RE: ARD-2015-148: Spring Hill Vill ge Initial Plan Dear Mr. Franklin, At its meeting an Thursday. January 21, 2016, Brie Albemarle Goody Archifictural Review Boars; by a vote of 4:0. voted to forward the Ulowing m—mendstims on the shove -noted Initial Site Development Plan to the agent for the Site Review Gam mikee: • Regsrdrg r=_cuir=_nn=_rt :c sat sfy the Jesig� g-_iQeli-e=_ Es .. 5 133E E.4c�2i 2- and (5y 1. Fs--c:e :- sn ':F, r:s c`=�:.re -se: 4:li, sm 'r::1- s o-.r 2. == Ear ng fe-cEE:= Jil 1, —i- j — met=_ 3l arJ eolc-ic_ -eecec in:he clan. Vinylilh xa -ni-j surface is not er o -fc0' 3-E '- E'le far this fence. S. .,c J the standard mecl-=.r :a e:l-_ c-=-t rote to both the site and arohrbeclural plans. =t ry cf all-1- 31E:p.c-a-[`a•-:1e E nuance �cric cr c_` al o he elim inated' ke.:ha :,ae- :r :1-e_ 1: at, x :-a 1: a -I s,'edule. t:9=ng_f 3'jE s- E:rE__c:";,:1-=EC=:c : -cE n:,. l-1 e_r= perse cr is nls tees ame nF I-le';a=_Face-neec_tn--=.ra l: ::cc_ed a long the ECs. - ­ __= the p are :c :.=a ply show a _t li- .vith their assco-e: essemerds. Provide ic nni play: -g eras. free of A tees ano aasements, alor- cctn EC... Is irj the a t=_ -1 cf tree removal and tree replacement plar ne J with off -site vndc along the -a as 1-e =.r: acEoe :Ien t-, sF ce :he intenor med trees no greeler than 40' apart. Show ncs =.r cF :f-:c — =F--rar:a fDi -I a EC vMI be maintained. 'C ice_=-r.:= -ir'I-�I-s::'snting.o- the south side dfew perking total Road C, =:,Get- T- 1._.r­ _. f� E_ : -­1 t'c" me ECG ;c--ha c:=Ic-3 :=t E=3=c. to :=f:l=4=-cc :�_ �e-"a n cWtsideoFthesevrer easennent. 1 ;[ J:I'e=:enc a':I : Is, t 1-ss:, l.`.:a :a tie 1: at,. - sr, olen:i^3s o'te e< arc erap &e be 31 —E"I 'eE :n =.1""I -e r-31-t31"ec st —1— -a -1-: :1-a:=F :Ire _- 7r = s :fen :I"a 3 -�s oral I— shall be pru ned m nlmsl.y a1. only tD s_ 1: ]c't :ha over. I Health Cf the cic, -ice material and odlor samples for the retaining walls. Incica:e materiel and ooloronthe to p an. ce the plan to show a temporary landscepetreatment forthesediment basin located at --a southeast oomer of fie propertyta Eslahish an appropriate appearance for the EC. r Is ihj phasing on the plan, including related landscape development. • Regarding recemm=_rdati¢ns on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: 1. t,c:e fpr tire submittals Ihst the Block A building win need to address EC Guidelines re: r e-e n:s for scale, proportion, massing, detailing, lack of blankness, etc. Aback of b, c nt 3:Faa-ar oe wil not 6e appropriate far elevations rrisihle fmm RI. 21). 2.-he.;PS s = l: r.e ofmbxed useslcommerciel uses elong the Entrance Corridor • Rags-J'-j eccm ""E :ao :dr-l'icns of initial plan approval: A Certificate of Appmprieteness is r.q, 'E=F'c' nE-1=D=.r Ec--I. 1. Re-c:E l-E :-to r:=_ c"�:_re Dhase bui Jirgc_ `ram the plar 2_ Re: as:-e 1: at-- :c c as s-:v, s .t i7y, li- rrl, tnE r ae sc :ia'edl easements. Prwtde sd-lc lE, [ — -y c'E3 f'E= :- 0 1 e5 a —emer, 3 n= bctn ECs. 3. Re _a1-e Akn:ca-:::a[er-avarylanoa.a:e teatr�en: =cr the sediment basin locetedet the cc rsr cf :I -a F :,er" a=_:a =h an sppr:Friate appearance for the EC. 4_ CIE.1.;. :h=3io-J c-:"E :a-. ncludmgrelate. and—pedevelopment. • Regarding ccnc t: -s I] ce =atis'ied priorth'rssuance of a grading permit: t4one_ You may c_ubr it you .1: A: —I: - =_f o-timued ARD mview atpour earliest convenience. Application forms, cheoklis s ar J ,al-aa.lea =re = :s a: = c }- nest—albemarte.orplAR9_ Please be certain th l yourARB submil. adcressec_ the aGc�E-rote. ssues. If yeu have any questions —ming any of the above. please feel tree io call me. Sinderely, Margaret Maliszewski Prinapal Planner CC: Spring Hill Land Development LLC 1nD Cwensviie Dr Chadott—ille VA 22DO1 11