The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200800182 Application 2008-12-16CDU ommunit Development Department ii nty of A marle 401 Mcln01 Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 -4596 Voice : (434) 296 -5832 Fax : (434) 972 -4126 Planning Application 1 PARCEL / OWNER INFORMATION TMP ; 03200- OO- 00 -041D0 : Owner(s): HOLLYMEAD AREA C OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC Application # SDP200800182 PROPERTY INFORMATION Legal Description ACREAGE OPEN SPACE /POCKET PARK Magisterial Dist. Rio Land Use Primary Open Current AFD Not in A/F District Current Zoning Primary Planned Development Mixed Commercial APPLICATION INFORMATION House #Street Name Apt / Suite City State Zip Street Address Entered By: Lisa Jordan on 12/16/2008 Application Type Site Development Plans Project: Laurel Park - Minor 6,408.00 Received Date 12/16/2008 Received Date Final Total Fees $ 95.00 Submittal Date 12/22/2008 Submittal Date Final Total Paid $ 95.00 Closing File Date Revision Number Comments: Legal Ad SUB APPLICATION(s) Type Sub Application Date Comments: Minor Amendment 12/16/2008 APPLICANT / CONTACT INFORMATION Primary Contact Name Southern Development - Keith Lancaster Phone # (434) 245 -0894 Street Address 170 South Pantops Drive Fax # 434) 245 -0895 City / State Charlottesville VA Zip Code 22911 -0000 E -mail klancaster @southern- development.com Cellular # ( ) Owner /Applicant Name HOLLYMEAD AREA C OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC Phone # ( ) Street Address 195 RIVERBEND DR Fax # City / State CHARLOTTESVILLE VA Zip Code 22911- E -mail Cellular # ( ) Applicant Name Southern Development - Keith Lancaster Phone # (434) 295 -0594 Street Address 170 South Pantops Drive Fax # 434) 245 -0895 City / State Charlottesville VA Zip Code 22911 -0000 E -mail klancaster @southern- development.com Cellular # ( ) Signature of Contractor or Authorized Agent Date Application for N jor & Minor Site Plan Amendments 3® and All Reinstatements of Denied or Deferred Site Plans J `-P Major Amendment (Subject to Planning Commission Review) = $270 Minor Amendment (alterations to parking, circulation, 17folded copies ofplan are required building size, location) = $95 8 folded copies of sketch plan are required Reinstate Plan Review After 10 day Denial = $200 Reinstate Plan After Site Review Denial or Suspension = $65 Reinstate Plan Deferred by Applicant To a specific date = $35 Indefinitely = $75 17folded copies ofplan are required Groundwater Assessment (Required for all non - residential site plans not serviced by public water) Was a Groundwater Assessment conducted for the existing site plan? YES aNO If NO and the new plans show a use less than 2,000 gallons per day Tier 3 Groundwater Review = $400 If NO and the new plans show a use greater than 2,000 gallons per day Tier 4 Groundwater Review = $1,000 If YES and the use goes from less than to more than 2,000 gallons per day Tier 4 — Tier 3 = $400 If YES and the use does not change from less than to more than 2,000 gallons per day No fee Relief from conditions of approval from Planning Commission or landscape waiver by agent = $180 Extension of approval prior to expiration of an approved plan = $45 11 Rehearing of Site Development Plan by the Planning Commission or Board of Supervisors = $190 Appeal of Site Development Plan to the Board of Supervisors = $240 i Project Name:? Cam C v t --, i r, 1t.; (E rt i' ck. S Tax map and parcel: 12- ' Linn Magisterial District: j' t C Zoning: ? k ? i ) Physical Street Address (if assigned): Location of property (landmarks, intersections, or other): r ! t. % , d c_ i t . , ( + Contact Person (Who should we call /write concerning this project ?):L r, =; Address x :t, ` 1 <`01) /City C-11,;, letter .e State Zip 301_ Daytime Phone ) r Fax <f`f Fax #( /3`i) <?`l` c,J ` 5 E-mail _E:L<•F 1i,1, 41c . 0 a,n= can- - Owner of Record j i < ,. C llAddress1, t` -.r 1 ` - Fj City c rc- " {c'.l\.c"State Zip 2 zc(1( Daytime Phone (`t -'9 ) < i i j y Fax # ( E -mail Applicant (Who is the Contact person representing ?): t. .\\,A Address =_1C l t , ,.:`', l 'City (1 . y_s e_State c } Zip t i Daytime Phone (`_:,)2,ct FaxFax # ( % ) -' r ' t ' ' ,E- mail t c( Lr ='_ Ll t: f•`r.,r , .Le'r FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 7 J / SDP # (2 S —/5 I vl 'D,B whop i ik I,Fee Amount $Date Paid y e • Receipt Ck# ' ' 15 By: t , L 1. 73yy/ County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296 -5832 Fax: (434) 972 -4126 11/119/07 Page 1 of2 Intended use or iustification f\ _ equest: r -s tC't t :[+- '- lzw' \ \v ") ii .. -+-i 1 ..- tG•...a -.0 < , ` li.ive__L. t> Z Ll Owner /Applicant Must Read and Sign This site plan as submitted contains all of the information required by Section 32.5 (Preliminary Plan) or Section 32.6 (Final Plan) of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. 1 understand that plans which lack information required by said sections shall be deemed incomplete and shall be denied by the agent within ten (10) days of submittal as provided in Section 32.4.2.1 or Section 32.4.3.3 as the case may be. For Final Plans Only: To the best of my knowledge, I have complied with Section 32.4.3.1 and obtained tentative approvalsforallapplicableconditionsfromtheappropriateagencies. 1, f 2 j Yc iSignatueofOwner, Contract Purchaser; Agent Date k (C' <: Print Name Daytime phone number of Signatory I I //19/07 Page 2 of 2 Application for Variations from Approved Plans,J. i•..s . r4 Codes and Standards of Development DATE: _.. 1__G NAME OF PLANNED DISTRICT: kt t i{ )ma+ =c i%us n erZ t 1)t( t,l c,,C.... ZMA Nt.1MRER(5): f A 0 Contact Person : Address; )l t;..4k;zi t City C.ifw (ottc'l.,.;tt State ti Zip 2d 2 ~ C';54-14 F 2 Cµ 4 1 r f . Daytime Phone ; • CC 1 . Z } W Fax R( r ` ....».....e.._ 4 'Y t'.-in81t l GVt.Y:e.T.> SC i \VZI _' What type of change is requested ?: Gariation to the PIan eVariation to the Code or Standard Provide a copy of the existing plan (may be a reduced copy) illustrating the area for which the change is requested. Provide a graphic representation of the requested change. Describe the variation being sought (may attach separate sheets): E P.. c.6.1 ( -4 iv\ What is the reason for each of the requested variations ?: County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Voice: (434) 296 -5832 Fax: (434) 972-4126 7/24/06 Page 1 of 2 4110 kid) In accordance with § 8.5.5.3 c) of the Zoning Ordinance, in order to grant the variation, the Planning Director must make positive findings under 5 criteria. Please provide information about these criteria for the Director's consideration (may attach separate sheets). 1. Is the variation consistent with the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan? ir k. •411 Ip '.1 tt 4.1 r1(yr.12,11..f c 2. Does the variation increase the approved development density or intensity of development? v,:t• J 3. Does the variation adversely affect the timing and phasing of development of any other development in the zoning district? 4. Does the variation require a special use permit? 5. Is it in general accord with the purpose and intent of the approved rezoning application? r.%4A 8.5.5.3 VARIATIONS FROM APPROVED PLANS, CODES, AND STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT The director of planning and community development may allow a site plan or subdivision plat for a planned development to vary from an approved application plan, standard of development and, also, in the case of a neighborhood model district, a general development plan or code of development, as provided herein: a. The director is authorized to grant a variation from the following provisions of an approved plan, code or standard: 1. Minor variations to yard requirements, maximum structure heights and minimum lot sizes; 2,,Changes to the arrangement of buildings and uses shown on the plan, provided that the major elements Shovvn on the plan and their relationships remain the same; 3. Changes to phasing plans; 4. Minor changes to landscape or architectural standards; and 5. Minor variations to street design. d. Any variation not expressly provided for herein may be accomplished by rezoning. 7/24/06 Page 2 of 2 November 13. 200N Albemarle County Community Development Attn: Wayne ('iliruhcrg. Director of Nanning 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville. \":\ 22902 Re: Laurel Park, 11o11vmead "boys n ('enter Block 5, Section 8.5.5.3 Variations from Approved flans, ('odes, and Standards of i)evelopments (111, 01 -20, Area (') Darr Wavnc, Southern Development would like to request a variation to Lontngi Map Amendment 2001- 20. This request is for Area C, block 5 as shown on the approved application plan dated July 7, 2003 and described in the appro‘ ed ('ode of Development dated .tune 17. 2003. In addition to the \vritten request we have provided an exhibit ( "A ") that depicts out variation to the architectural standard described in the approved ('ode of cvelcrputent. l he town Center Area C. ('ode of Development narrative describes Block \' as designed to accommodate two rows of townhouses. which \vill front onto - limherwood Boulevard and the street behind. 'fhe parking will he internalized between the townhouses in garages and with additional parking to be provided on the street that form the boundary to this block." Along with the Code an application plan was approved showing surface parking and single car garages per each unit !Or the townhouses fronting on "I imcrwood Boulevard. The adjacent row of townhouses fronting (hand Fork Boulevard showed single car garages to the rear of the units. 1 he approved site development plan (SDI' 2005 -95) provides Iwo car garage:, for per unit vithin this block. I he variation request is to provide surface parking for I(, of the 42 units within this block. The units we are requesting to provide surface parking hoot ou I'imberwood Boulevard and are referenced as lot 1 -10 un the approved site plan. Furthermore, we would like to split the single row of 10 units into two rows of units each. For the townhouses fronting (irand Forks Boulevard. we again request to split the single row uf' 10 units into two rows of units each and lea%c the garages as shown on the approved site plan. The basis for this request is to help reduce the overall mass of structures located within alley between the rows of townhouses (photographs provided showing the units already constructed). By removing the detached garages and splitting the rows of townhouses we will reduce the overall impervious area of the site, i'his additional green space will allow us to increase the tree canopy within the alley. This new concept will also allow us to provide a broader range of )rousing types and price points within the saute block. We believe these modifications meet the intent of Section x.5.5.3 and would be happy to answer ant questions tiou may have. , thank von For vour time and consideration. Sincer.•1k 1i Keith Lancaster II ' I , ,IIiI ' , 1 I 1 — _.... — I 1 I s 1 1 I 1 I s 1 i I 1 f 111 1 11 I1IA 1 A c 111 IAAl 1 t A