Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200900008 Review Comments 2008-05-12County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Judith Wiegand, Senior Planner From: Amelia McCulley, Zoning Administrator Division: Zoning Date: May 12, 2008 Subject: SP 2007-053 St. Annes-Belfield New Academic Building Project — parking study review I have reviewed the parking study and can support the number of proposed parking spaces based on the information provided. This parking determination relies heavily on the applicant's knowledge of their parking needs based on a significant history of use. The plan calls for a total of 306 parking spaces. During regular daily academic school use, the number of spaces in use may be much less than that number. However, these facts contribute to the need for some flexibility and the allowance of more than the minimum number of parking spaces: 1. The campus is on a large parcel and different uses/facilities are spread out over a distance of almost'A mile. This distance tends to discourage the use of shared parking spaces for multiple functions/uses. 2. There are numerous facilities and related activities on this property: academic school, numerous athletic fields, convocation center, gymnasium and the like. There can be several concurrent events. 3. The convocation center and gym are areas of assembly which can seat up to 700 people (together) and often seat up to 500 attendees. 4. The athletic fields can be the site of regional meets or tournaments involving other schools. This requires more parking than if the fields only served these students. I 2' � u8 TIED 11: 44 FAX 434 972 4035 UIV OF CURRENT DEVFLCtPNE [ t,t1?6 Application m: smoo800147 Short Review Comments Project Name:;St Annes•Be{field Lower/Middle School - Prel Ptelinlinary _ Non-residential Date Completed; 10/20!2008 Reviewer. Andrew Slack F-911 Rovicw $talus: No Obleoiton Reviews Comments: ;NO OBJECTION. Gate Completed, 10/13/2008 Reviewer Jay Sehlothauer/ Inspections Review Status: No Objection `., Reviews Comments: Based on plans revised September 29, 2008. !No comments or conditions. D4tc Completed: 10/14/2008 Reviewer: Judith Wiegand / Planning Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: jNo objections to Site Plan revised September 29, 2008, Date Completed: 10/13/2006 Reviewer: Max Greene / Engineer Z&CD ReviEw Status; Requested Changes Reviews Comments: ISRC 10/23/08 Iw/ WP0200800094 i' Date Completed: 10/15/2008 Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski ARB Rcviow Status. Requested Changes Reviews Comments: !This proposal will be reviewed by the ARB on November 17. Comments will be provided after that � (meeting. ,.J�rl �� `�''�1tcnN+" County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum From: Max Greene, Current Development engineering review Date: 10-13-08 Subject: St, Anne's Belfield Preliminary Site Plan (SDP200800147) The preliminary site plan has been reviewed. The following items will be adequately addressed prior to preliminary approval. ty ✓{ Sheet CO.1 appears to have incomplete notes for the Cistern detail. Please check all notes for ' completeness. J Storm pipes change in direction of flow (or deflection angle) will be 90 degrees or greater (flow @� should not have to reverse direction) [Policy] deflection in manhole #17 appears to be tighter v than 90 degrees and should be corrected in a manner that does not create a possible reverse flow 0� C. r'� � ' situation. Storm sewer access points will be 300' or less for 15" to 42" pipes. Please add a manhole between "r ,4,MH #7 and MH #14C for inspection and maintenance of the system. 4. All existing streets with labeled pavement and right-of-way widths, route numbers and street names ✓' �+ All proposed streets, with right-of-way and street names /6. Stationing at 50' minimum on all proposed streets, matching the street profile Please to the view sections in a minimum 50' intervals. /7. add road centerline stationing plan 8. Street edge of pavement or curb radii labeled at all intersections and turnarounds. r'✓3. Please show and label all utility crossings on the profiles for verification of adequate placement r Z���rlt�I0 SAW „� � and separation. y /10. The stations of intersections need to be shown and labeled with street names. 11. Nw�r All entrances will show a VDOT designation (PE -1, CG -9A etc.) t. Z�jZty0. v12. Please show unobstructed sight distance lines at entrances per VDOT requirements. 13. All existing easements (access, drainage, sight, sanitary easements, etc.) with deed book references, locations and dimensions [18-32.6.6, 14-302] 4. Curbing on all parking areas and travelways with VDOT designations (CG -2, CG -6) '15. Loading and dumpster areas accessible at all times (not behind parkin-) /,,16. Minimum 3' width of curbed islands [Policy] r -,A' . All edges of pavement labeled (where there is no curbing) ,G,•ti=� 9 ��`18. parking width x depth x aisle width is 9x18x24' or 10xl8x20' (where a 2' grass overhang is possible parking spaces can be 16' deep per detail 2) 19. Loading spaces are 12'x`_'5' are required for site plans with a minimum aisle width of 24'. r, 20. Sidewalk abutting parking is 6' wide (exclusive of curb), or bumper blocks are provided (see reference details) 1 t< rE �� 1. Sidewalks are a minimum 5' wide, exclusive of curb 22. Dumpster pads are 10'x10' with 8' in front for wheel bearing (total 18' depth) v'23. Drainage does not run across, through, or backwater in dumpster areas [18-4.12.19] ►*"')4. Labels on all drainage structures provided (and should match the drainage computations and profiles) several of the structures are not labeled the same on all sheets. Please check the submittal for congruency. Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review comments Page 2 of 21 Final plan approval will require all minimum checklist items adequately addressed. Please refer to the Design Manual minimum checklist for additional items required for final approval before resubmittal. 0G x,/25. Professional seal, signed and dated is required prior to finallpi�oval. [18-32.6.1] J"'�.' �� vU ' -2 6. Please add the notes supplied in the County Design Manual for all applications shown on the y'►+iG`— plans. / 27. Please submit pavement design work sheets. v/ J= -v : i JVirte- r4� 28. Pavement markings dimensioned and labeled f 9. Signs for traffic control shown and labeled: speed limit on all streets, stop signs at all intersections k:..n I� C> J v 30. Street name signs at every intersection dC>t�15 �"� )1. Please label the beginnings and endings to the Guardrail according to centerline stationing for bonding, installation, and inspection. 1„►�i 1" 32. "Stormwater Maintenance Agreement" and fee required for final approval. [17-304E] ✓ y tf;es v� ��� � � n — 33. VDOT approval is required for final approval. ►�'�'� �� ✓`J tir � V.. d ��. Sidewalk detail or specification to be a minimum 4" stone base and 4" concrete of 3000psi at 28 days, or stronger. [specs are policy per 14-4221 Dumpster pad detail or specification to be a minimum 4" stone base and 6" concrete of 3000psi at V28 days, or stronger, reinforced with a minimum grid of wire reinforcing or #4 bars at 12 on center. [specs are policy] This list does not include Water protection (E&SC, SWM) comments due to the level of changes requested prior to preliminary approval. ot ai.��v 3 �= County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum From: Max Greene, Current Development engineering review Date: 10-13-08 Subject: St. Anne's Belfield Preliminary Site Plan (SDP200800147) The preliminary site plan has been reviewed. The following items will be adequately addressed prior to preliminary approval. A. Sheet CO. I appears to ha e incomplete notes for the Cistern detail. Please check all notes for completeness. ;5 i A PLAAe � Nn �e (p ft k'-'f°V P' Pe O2. Storm pipes change in direction of flow (or deflection angle) will be 90 degrees or greater (flow should not have to reverse direction) [Policy] deflection in manhole # 17 appears to be tighter than 90 degrees and should be corrected in a manner that does not create a possible reverse flow situation. tt3. Storm sewer access points will be 300' or less for 15" to 42" pipes. Please add a manhole between MH #7 and MH #I 4C for inspection and maintenance of the system. All existing streets with labeled pavement and right-of-way widths, route numbers and street names All proposed streets, with right-of-way and street names Stationing at 50' minimum on all proposed streets, matching the street profile %. Please add road centerline stationing to the plan view sections in a minimum 50' intervals. Street edge of pavement or curb radii labeled at all intersections and turnarounds. V,O. Please show and label all utility crossings on the profiles for verification of adequate placement and separation. X10. The stations of intersections need to be shown and labeled with street names. 1-1-. All entrances will show a VDOT designation (PE -1, CG -9A etc.) ,�& Please show unobstructed sight distance lines at entrances per VDOT requirements. 13. All existing easements (access, drainage, sight, sanitary easements, etc.) with deed book references, locations and dimensions [18-32.6.6, 14-302] Ok-14. Curbing on all parking areas and travelways with VDOT designations (CG -2, CG -6) t4-15. Loading and dumpster areas accessible at all times (not behind parking) ►L 16. Minimum 3' width of curbed islands [Policy] W. All edges of pavement labeled (where there is no curbing) 18. parking width x depth x aisle width is 9x 18x24' or l Ox 18x20' (where a 2' grass overhang is possible parking spaces can be 16' deep per detail 2) 6*j 9. Loading spaces are 12'x25' are required for site plans with a minimum aisle width of 24'. X20. Sidewalk abutting parking is 6' wide (exclusive of curb), or bumper blocks are provided (see reference details) ,1. Sidewalks are a minimum 5' wide, exclusive of curb �K22. Dumpster pads are 10'x10' with 8' in front for wheel bearing (total 18' depth) ►x,23. Drainage does not run across, through, or backwater in dumpster areas [18-4.12.19] 24. Labels on all drainage structures provided (and should match the drainage computations and profiles) several of the structures are not labeled the same on all sheets. Please check the submittal for congruency. Albemarle County Community Development Engineering Review comments Page 2 of 2 Final plan approval will require all minimum checklist items adequately addressed. Please refer to the Design Manual minimum checklist for additional items required for final approval before resubmittal. 25. Professional seal, signed and dated is required prior to final approval. [18-32.6.1] 26. Please add the notes supplied in the County Design Manual for all applications shown on the plans. pK 27. Please submit pavement design work sheets. uA F,'n� t- ok-28. Pavement markings dimensioned and labeled OK -29. Signs for traffic control shown and labeled: speed limit on all streets, stop signs at all intersections d K- 30. Street name signs at every intersection � JL31. Please label the beginnings and endings to the Guardrail according to centerline stationing for bonding, installation, and inspection. 32. " Stormwater Maintenance Agreement" and fee required for final approval. [17-304E] 33. VDOT approval is required for final approval. 34. Typical sections for proposed channels with locations referenced from the plan view sheets 5. Sidewalk detail or specification to be a minimum 4" stone base and 4" concrete of 3000psi at 28 days, or stronger. [specs are policy per 14-422] V-3 6. Dumpster pad detail or specification to be a minimum 4" stone base and 6" concrete of 3000psi at 28 days, or stronger, reinforced with a minimum grid of wire reinforcing or #4 bars at 12" on center. [specs are policy] This list does not include Water protection (E&SC, SWM) comments due to the level of changes requested prior to preliminary approval. `��«)u�l��,t� rte �er•� OA �`\bpm a0eia� eOILOG nit`l � Cepa,Xm \aecK'�et, P�' S��ror p1a � er SGhoo1 ' Pie\\minaCy unry G k, en ja: S� rner�C�eent�evo\oPm t\ie fitheR\be`�ec�erztlta Fromm-pan; Zona def 20, 2���' nnes �' iv\s�0n ° ane P\'a`1 phis pcto 81�� St. P ,� veioP�'ent �d aPPrave sed- ��he mems °r Oa�e' t SDP��6 �urrert\i\ rec°`gym pori\�` addc aft\ona\ c° � mrner�tis Sob1ec the Zor`\`�`�eloPmentbeen sags t finis`'a' Aew each e p\anr`er ��mmun\ty D \terns have ident�fi\e8 ori fiudher r�Unty fade ©epa�me e� tie �o\1ow�a have b�nated ba$e p,1be�`arle G at\on'• ?bays ens ase th added or of encs to th \\a.\ng'snfiorrn pnd\t\ons 01a, \�cab1� se de the fip Preceded by ,�.5.61a1 ra \pm owner t Anne,s �e\4\e1d dew Nme & dei d\PaeC2\ numbers. with p2467 �2 S • .� MaPtion assoc\ate° * ch �hEefi, v �uo�p\Ete11 � ce fior e\evat\on • tden��iy\ng ee t5. L Foad datum Cefier appy' a�dlndoX\on reauireo strafe `rac O ource ofi toPey \n P\an pa buy a\n� sed erssary to d P\ease e'er ,�'� �°arcs °fi s fi sheets and and a as ne rovided •� - Otat k en n mber °etba��at cretlU\ aged US 5,JSta d rata ed .m Sect\on �$ his d schedu\ as descr\b rri\tted � �2 5. odate uVe t6res b n sub ryy, �eG 18 accamm s ec�fi\c re dsCape tea 4 2 hasra\ded to teed to tC e kyle 5`te Gan fiO p �\n9 tan \a SEc d'\n9 be i5t n tan s P en a ord�r`a1$� 5 6�e}�E shown ° a Waver °� w\t� staff ttS �,aer het\n g 4`c� n\u5t \eAoest #°r r ate rev\e ub\rc �h ,\ 24Qg m Mentg�' E?ti�vt \s noteGeSsed ads a aaaba�artts N°vember Community aev�\oP �a to,ni\s5\©n a9end re oepament ofi ti at ec Freder\catn. 'P � � •� .c t �Umm r to\orm k� �/s' p\ease co 3565 fior fiurthe 11) 21 2,, n8 ti ED 11: 43 FAX 134 0 7 2 •1635 DIV (IF CURRENT UEVED)Pl1E Di=PARTMFNT OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 DAVID S. EKERN, P.E. COMh11931PNVi October 21 ', 2008 Mi. Glenn Brooks Depa=cm of Hngine.ering and Development =101 MCh76rC Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject Sitc Rmm Meeting Comments October 23"', 2008 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below arc VDOT's comments on the Site. Plitt, for the. October 23`j, 2008 Site Review Committee Meeting: Sl)E'-2009.00134 The Meadows Expansion -- Final (Summer Frederick 1, All connections to Rte 1230 need to be designed in accordance with VDOT's Road Design ?Manual and The Ivlinimuni Standards of Entrances to State Highways. The plans needs to include all dimensions of proposed roads an.d entrances along wide horizontal and vertical data- 2. ata2. Sight distatic , need to be shown on die, Plaits, 3. All work within the VDOT R/W needs to be permitted by VDOT's Charlottesville Office. 4. The ROW around the cul-de-sac needs to be checked for accuracy. The ROW should not include Private structures. 5. Detectable Warning meds to be addrd to the crossw.tlk. SDP -2008-00142 Hydraulic Wash — Maior (EUzabeth Marotta) L The eii vine, need, to be co.osuvctea t( 'Tie Minimum Standards of Fnitrarices to State Highways Throat widths, setbacks and grades ht accordance with the CG -l1 standard need to be showm on rhe plain. 2 Show the locations of the CG -12's SDp-2008-00146 Flollymead Town Center -Area C Blocl: 9 -Major (Gerald Gatobu) 1. Indicate whether Laurel Part: Lane is proposed to be public or pnvatc. If it's public, the entrances will u;. d to be evaluated. SDP -2008-00147 St. Anne's Bellicid Lower / N iddle School —Prelim. Summer I� redericic 1. Pipe and ditch computations need to be submitted on the section of Route 855 that is being proposed for widening,. ✓?, Drainage structure 17 is being proposed to be modified to accrpt water from the ditch in the back }� ' �►'1 � of the DI- This design needs to be revised to eliminate this modified structmc for m.untcnaricc reasons. pia° ti��t Show• exisdng and proposed ROW on the plans. Show sight distance triangles at all intcrseetions. WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING 11).•22,'(18 WED 11:4:3 FA.1 434 ;1'72 4035 DIV [iF CURRENT DEVED)PAIE �JUuS y7e)tjiP-- i' 5. Entrance design must be in ;accordance with VDOT standard ('Cf -1 1 and The Minimum Stunda d� �5;flixL of Entrances to Slalc Hii;hwtay,s, Profiles need to be shown on the plans. i< —SRIF DC 144- v-6 All proposed pavement widening must be in accordance with VDOT's WP -2 standard. Assumed CBR v lues for desi4m purpose is 5. Materials and pavement design must be in accordance with VDnT's Secondary Roads Pavement Dcsign Cuide.. 11;,A C7 5 s � -hos `' propos(.d DI -Ts witltout an outlet. Please explain this desi;m n. ;tA L,y`/Kenmve the second point of Kecess at the saarn teentrance lig route 85,5585,55that accesses the uddle lot. This design does not meet the Minimum Standards of Entrances to Stair fthways and will �, GwAT inercase conflict points at the entrtric.c..and effuse a dangerous situation. S-2008-0040 Little Yellow Mountain —Final Plat (Megar S'aniRlnsl 1 _ Show sivht triangles in accordance with The Minimum Standards of Entrances to Statc lLghways at the proposed access to Route CA=I. Please request the applicants provide a wTitlen description of revisions with re-subnussrons. If you have my questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing thcsc cormt tCms with the applicants. Sincerely, Jocl DvNunzio, P,F, Staff Eu--inc-,r V,WT Charlotics ville Residency 434-293-0011 cc hill Fritz, David Bcnish, Aim Wade, Elaine F-chols, loan McDowell, Judith Wiegand, Mar -ares Nlahszewski, David Pennock. Francis McCall, ,ton Sharp, Summer Frederick, Patrick Lawrence, and John GiomeW WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING . Ot .4Llic, t .1 � /1tGltilPl County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum From: Max Greene, Current Development engineering review Date: 11-14-08 Subject: St. Anne's Belfield Preliminary Site Plan (SDP200800147) The preliminary site plan has received a second review. Items required for Preliminary approval appear adequately addressed. The following list of comments will be addressed in the final plan review phase: 1. All plan pages will have congruent information. The current discrepancies between page of the submittal will be corrected. 2. Sheet CO.1 Notes # 5 and #6 will be completed. Note 45 appears to have information missing and note #6 appears to refer to pipes, but is not clear. 3. All proposed roadwork will have 50" stationing shown on the road plan and profile. 4. Edge of pavement will be labeled (where there is no curbing) and a few radii are still missing from the road plans. 5. Please show and label all utility crossings on the profiles for verification of adequate placement and separation. 6. Sight distances will be shown on all entrances in accordance with VDOT standards. 7. All sidewalks will be a minimum 5" wide unless modified or waved by the agent. [18-32.3.10] 8. Drainage structures will be congruently labeled on all pages and submittals. 9. Professional seal, signed and dated is required prior to final approval. [18-32.6.1] 10. All applicable notes supplied in the County Design Manual will be shown on the plans. 11. VDOT Pavement design work sheets will be submitted for approval. 12. " Stormwater Maintenance Agreement" and fee required for final approval. [17-304E] 13. VDOT approval is required for final approval. 14. Typical sections for proposed channels with locations referenced from the plan view sheets. 15. Stormwater pipe will be a minimum 15'" diameter for inspection and maintenance. The County Engineer may allow a 12" pipe with adequate justification for the variance. Please refer to the Design Manual minimum checklist for additional items required for final approval before resubmittal. Water protection review is not a part of preliminary review and will be sent in accordance with The Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Law. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 January 23, 2009 Gloeckner Engineering Cliff Harrison c/o Kurt M Gloeckner PE PLS clfflnrrsn l,aol.com 508 Dale Ave Suite A Charlottesville, VA 22903 RB: ARB -2008-147: St. Anne's -Bellfield Lower/Middle School Tax Map 60, Parcel 57 Dear Mr. Gloeckner: Fax (434) 972-4126 On January 20, revised plans were submitted for the above referenced project. The submittal included sheets 1-8 of 20 with revision date of 1/20/09, sheets 9-13 of 20 with revision date of 1/13/09, sheets 14 and 15 of 20 with revision date of 1/15/09, and sheets 16-20 with revision date of 12/1/08. My review, has focused on sheets 9 through 15. It is my understanding that the other sheets have not changed since my previous review and I have not spent time confirming this by reviewing those sheets. If my assumption is incorrect, submit a list of changes that have been made and I will review those plans. Regarding the landscape plan, the layout and plant choices are acceptable. However; the plan is not completely coordinated with the plant schedule and the plan is difficult to read. The following changes are required: 1. Include the plant abbreviations in the plant schedule. 2. For plants that are proposed in more than one size, provide different abbreviations for the different sizes. (For example, the maples.) 3. For each abbreviation shown on the plan, include the abbreviation in the schedule. (For example, RH is in the schedule, but RHI and R1-12 are on the plan.) 4. Use a single symbol for each plant. (For example, the Cf are shown three different ways and the Vp are shown two different ways.) 5. Provide the quantity of plants and a connecting line for each plant group on the plan. (For example, the Ilex, Rh, Az.) 6. Where plants are shown on more than one overlapping sheet, provide the plant information (quantity, abbreviation, connecting line, etc.) on both sheets. 7. Make the label for the trees west of the curved 12 -space parking row legible. 8. Label the small tree at the west end of the western playing field that is currently not labeled. 9. Check and correct all plant quantities. Some appear to be inaccurate. (For example, the Vp and Ce) I have tried to provide examples in this list to help clarify the issues that need to be resolved. Due to the complexity of the plan and the inconsistencies, the examples may not be all-inclusive. You should check and double-check the planting plan and the schedule for complete coordination and accuracy before re- submitting. Regarding the lighting plan, in my previous correspondence 1 indicated that the bollard fixture would meet ordinance requirements if the 32 watt fluorescent lamp were used. This change was not made on the drawings. I spoke with Rich Salopek yesterday morning and lie indicated that switching to the 32 watt lamp would not be a problem. The following change is required. 10. Revise the lighting plan and the bollard fixture to use the 32 watt fluorescent bulb. You may consider this letter a conditional Certificate of Appropriateness. Your Certificate of Appropriateness is granted with the condition that the above -noted revisions be made and included in your final site plan submittal. If changes other than those outlined above are made to the plan, those changes are also subject to my review and should be outlined in a list provided by you with the final site plan. If changes are inconsistent with the ARB's approval, the revisions may be forwarded to the ARB for additional review and approval. This approval is predicated on the fact that the design and materials, as proposed and exhibited for review, will be used. The acceptance of approval implies that the applicant has agreed to execute the design as indicated on the site plan, attachments, materials, samples, and other submittal items presented. Any change in the approved design or materials will require an amendment to the plan and must be reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board. Also note that this approval is subject to the following condition: Mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the Entrance Corridor. If you have any questions concerning this action, you may contact me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner cc: St Armes Belfield, 2132 Ivy Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903 Bowie Gridley Architects, 1010 Wisconsin Ave NW, Washington DC 20007 File Phone (434) 296-5832 February 5, 2009 Gloeckner Engineering c/o Kurt M Gloeckner PE PLS 508 Dale Ave Suite A Charlottesville, VA 22903 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Cliff Harrison clffllrrsniuiaol.com RE: ARB -2008-147: St. Anne's -Bellfield Lower/Middle School Tax Map 60, Parcel 57 Dear Mr. Gloeckner: Fax (4341972-4126 Hal Jones The Cos Company 220 East High St. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subsequent to my January 23, 2009 conditional ARB approval letter to you, I received multiple revisions for the above -referenced project. The revisions included in the last submittal address the outstanding issues of the conditional approval. You may consider this letter your Certificate o1`Appropriateness. This approval is predicated on the fact that the design and materials, as proposed and exhibited for review, will be used. The acceptance of approval implies that the applicant has agreed to execute the design as indicated on the site plan, attachments, materials, samples, and other submittal items presented, some of which are listed below. Any change in the approved design or materials will require an amendment to the plan and must be reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board. • Sheets 1-8 with revision date of 1/23/09 • sheets 9-13 with revision date of 1/23/09 (received 1/30/09) • sheets 14 and 15 with revision date of 1/23/09 • Sheets 16-19 dated December 1, 2008 (received 1/26/09) • Sheet 20 dated September 29, 2008 Please note the following: 1. This approval is subject to the following condition: Mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the Entrance Corridor. 2. If your final site plan submittal to the Current Development Division is inconsistent with this ARB approval, additional review and approval by me and/or the ARB may be required. If you have any questions concerning this action, you may contact me. Sincerely, Margaret Maliszewski Principal Planner cc: St Annes Belfield, 2132 Ivy Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903 Bowie Gridley Architects, 1010 Wisconsin Ave NW, Washington DC 20007 File Albemarlet e Service Auth4rity_ Serving6Comerving February 12, 2009 Mr. Kurt Gloeckner, P.E., L.S. Gloeckner Engineering/Surveying, Inc. 508 Dale Ave., Suite A Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 Re: St. Anne's -Belfield New Lower/Middle School Dear Mr. Gloeckner: The plan, entitled "St. Anne's -Belfield New Lower/Middle School" dated April 4, 2008, last revised February 10, 2009, is hereby approved for construction. One set of the approved plan is enclosed for your records. Any previously approved plans are voided with this approval. This approval is for basic compliance with the General Water & Sewer Construction Specifications of the Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) and does not relieve the contractor from responsibility for his work as it relates to the plan and specifications. The ACSA requires that a copy of the approved construction plan be on the job site. The contractor is responsible for marking up a copy of the approved construction plan showing as -built information and provide this data to your client at the completion of utility installation. The final as -built plan shall be submitted in a format of one paper copy and one mylar copy. A preconstruction conference shall be scheduled with the project manager to ensure coordination and answer any questions. This will be a short meeting to review the project, materials, test methods and schedule, in order to expedite construction. Please have the proper party call me at 977-4511 to schedule the meeting. This approval is valid for a period of 18 months from this date. If construction is not in progress at the end of this time period, the approval shall be void. If you have any questions, or if we can be of assistance, please give us a call at (434) 977-4511. Sincerely, C', U,(,J Gary M. Whelan GMW:dmg Civil Engineer cc: Cliff Harrison State Health Department Current Development, Bill Fritz Bldg Codes & Zoning Services Soil Erosion Inspector 050601 StAnnesGloecknerUr021309 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville, VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977-4511 • Fax (434) 979-0698 www.serviceauthority.org COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 Project: St Annes Belfield Lower / Middle School SDP200900008 Plan preparer: Kurt M Gloeckner PE PLS [fax 978-1444] Owner or rep.: St. Annes Belfield School Inc Attn. Dr Lewis Stephens [fax 979-7443] Plan received date: 10 February 2009 Date of comments: 25 February 2009 Reviewer: Max Greene The Final site and road plan for St. Annes Belfield Lower/Middle School submitted on 10 February 2009 have received Engineering review. The plans can not be approved until the following conditions from the preliminary approval have been adequately addressed. 1. 50' Stationing could not be found on the road plans that match the profiles. Please show the 50' stations on the plan view. 2. Edge of pavement will be labeled (where there is no curbing) or place a note to clarify the areas of curbing and no curbing on the plan sheet. 3. Please show and label all utility crossings on the profiles for verification of adequate placement and separation. This is to include the road profiles. 4. Sight distances will be shown on all entrances in accordance with VDOT standards. This includes the private entrances interior to the site. 5. All applicable notes supplied in the County Design Manual will be shown on the plans. Please refer to the Design Manual minimum checklist for additional items required for final approval before resubmittal. HIC': Z::1_a7.3,i:<.lY_,11Rf:;_ it. Anne-, 3.ad liiel.l.clzx; l0\ ALUf,r, Ali N"- ^t COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone(434)296-5532 Fax(434)972-4126 Project: St Annes Belfield Lower /Middle School SDP200900008 Plan preparer: Kurt M Gloeckner PE PLS [fax 978-1444] Owner or rep.: St. Armes Belfield School Inc Attn. Dr Lewis Stephens [fax 979-7443] Plan received date: 10 February 2009 Date of comments: 25 February 2009 Reviewer: Max Greene ,1 The Final site and road plan for St. Armes Belfield Lower/Middle School submitted on 10 February 2009 a + have received Engineering review. The plans can not be approved until the following conditions from the preliminary approval have been adequately addressed. 1. 50' Stationing could not be found on the road plans that match the profiles. Please show the 50' stations on the plan view. Edge of pavement will be labeled (where there is no curbing) or place a note to clarify the areas of I curbing and no curbing on the plan sheet. ��. Please show and label all utility crossings on the profiles for verification of adequate placement ✓ , f and sparati�in. This is to include the road profiles. x, , ''��±- �✓ 4. Sight distances will be shown on all entrances in accordance with VDOT standards, This includes the private entrances interior to the site. }� 5. All applicable notes supplied in the County Design Manual will be shown on the plans. itAixT Please refer to the Design Manual minimum checklist for additional items required for final approval before resubmittal. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 February 25, 2009 Kurt Gloeckner 508 Dale Ave Suite A Charlottesville VA 22903 RE: SDP 2009 - 08 St Anne's -Belfield Lower/Middle School — Final Site Plan Dear Mr. Gloeckner, I have reviewed the final site plan for this project against the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Special Use Permit Conditions. The plan lacks the following information which is required by the ordinance. (The applicable section number is provided following each comment.) 1. Minimum setbacks from Tax Map 60, Parcels 57, 57A, 57B, 57C and 56 are not shown. This significantly impacts the project. The proposed building locations do not meet the minimum setbacks, in fact the property lines run thru the buildings. The plan cannot be approved until the parcel boundaries are amended in such a way as to allow the buildings to meet setbacks. (32.5.6a) 2. The Tax Map number is not noted for the property. The parcel numbers are noted with the exception of one but the tax map is not noted. The Tax Map number is "60". The one parcel that is not noted is Tax Map 60, Parcel 56. (32.5.6a) 3. The plan notes that the zoning of the property is Rl . It is also zoned EC, Entrance Corridor Overlay District. This additional zoning must be noted on the plan. (32.5.6a) 4. Widths of travelways are not shown. (32.5.6i and 32.6.6g) 5. Dimensions of existing improvements are not shown. (32.5.6n) 6. The plan notes that this is in the Jack Jouett district and in Virginia. The ordinance requires that the plan note that the project is also in Albemarle County. (32.5.6a) 7. The present use of adjacent property is not noted. (32.5.6a) 8. Maximum acreage occupied by each use. This can be most easily accomplished by simply noting the square footage of the existing and proposed buildings. (32.5.6b) 9. Maximum footprint (in square feet) and dimensions of proposed improvements. (32.5.6n) 10. Note that the parking requirement of 309 spaces was established by the Zoning Administrator in a memo date May 12, 2008. This should replace note 15 on page 1 which references computations that are not provided on the plan as stated by the note. (32.5.6b, 32.6.6a and 32.6.6g) 11. At the time of signing the plans need to be sealed, signed and dated by a professional engineer or other individual licensed to prepare site plans. (32.6. 1) In addition to the above revisions the plan cannot be signed until the following approvals have been received. 1. Current Development Engineer approval. Max Greene is currently reviewing the plans and his comments are attached. 2. Albemarle County Fire & Rescue Department approval. The plans have been forwarded to James Barber. 3. ARB approval. The plan is under review by Margaret Mahszewski. If you need anything else or have any questions please let me know. Sincerely, William D. Fritz, AICP Chief of Current Development Cc: Cliff Harrison via address - clffhrrsn@aol.com L %kCtN�P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Phone (434) 296-5832 February 25, 2009 Burt Gloeck ner 508 Dale Ave Suite A Charlottesville VA 22903 Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 e ro RE: SDP 2009 - 08 St Annie's -Belfield Lower/Middle School —Final Site Plan Dear Mr. Gloeckner, Fax (434) 972-4126 I have reviewed the final site plan for this project against the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Special Use Permit Conditions. The plan lacks the following information which is required by the ordinance. (The applicable section number is provided following each cormnent.) Minimum setbacks from Tax Map 60, Parcels 57, 57A, 5713, 57C and 56 are not shown. This significantly impacts the project. The proposed building locations do not meet the minimum setbacks, in fact the property lines run tluu the buildings. The plan cannot be approved until the parcel boundaries are amended in such a way as to allow the buildings to meet setbacks. (32.5.6a) The Tax Map number is not noted for the property. The parcel numbers are noted with the exception of one but the tax map is not noted. The Tax Map number is "60". The one parcel that is not noted is Tax Map 60, Parcel 56. (32.5.6a) The plan notes that the zoning of the property is R1., It is also zoned EC, Entrance Corridor Overlay_ District. This additional zoning must be noted_ on the_plan. (32.5.6a) Widths of travelways are not shown. (32.5.6i and 32.6.6g) -- - � ����� `,T4 c—,� --l' � �� � � � 4W�y ► � Dimensions of existing improvements are not shown (32.5.6n) Z,Z k u � The pian notes that this is in the Jack Jouett district and in Virginia. The ordinance requires that the plan note that the project is also in Albemarle County. (32.5.6a) fxtkvw e.,twl 5 tt V - The present use of adjacent property is not noted. (32.5.6a) tit Maximum acreage occupied by each use. This can be most easily accomplished by simply noting the square footage of the existing and proposed buildings. (32.5.6b) ja w'vh+ >►�+i bi.. R �� Maximum footprint (in square feet) and dimensions_o_f proposed iinpi_ovements. (32.5.6n) Note that the parking requirement of 309 spaces was established by the Zoning Administrator in a memo date May 12, 2008. This should replace note 15 on page 1 which references computations that are not provided on the plan as stated by the note. (32.5.6b, 32.6.6a and 32.6.68) At the time of signing the plans need to be sealed, signed and dated by a professional engineer or other individual licensed to prepare site plans. (32.6.1) In addition to the above revisions the plan cannot be signed until the following approvals have been received. 1. Current Development Tngineor approval. Max Greene is currently reviewing the plans and his cpimnents are attached. ?. /Albemarle County Fire & Rescue Department approval. The plans have been forwarded to James Barber. c—o A'TVr3 n.= . 3. V -ARB approval. The plan is under- review by Margaret Maliszewski. If you need anything else or have any questions please let me know. Sincerely, William D. Fritz, AICF Chief of Current Development Cc: Cliff Harrison via address - clffhrrsn@aol.com vlRctr�P COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 February 25, 2009 Kurt Gloeckner 508 Dale Ave Suite A Charlottesville VA 22903 RE: SDP 2009 - 08 St Anne's -Belfield Lower/Middle School — Final Site Plan Dear Mr. Gloeckner, I have reviewed the final site plan for this project against the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Special Use Permit Conditions. The plan lacks the following information which is required by the ordinance. (The applicable section number is provided following each comment.) 1. Minimum setbacks from Tax Map 60, Parcels 57, 57A, 5713, 57C and 56 are not shown. This significantly impacts the project. The proposed building locations do not meet the minimum r setbacks, in fact the property lines run thru the buildings. The plan cannot be approved until the 1` parcel boundaries are amended in such a way as to allow the buildings to meet setbacks. (32.5.6a) 2. The Tax Map number is not noted for the property. The parcel numbers are noted with the exception of one but the tax map is not noted. The Tax Map number is "60". The one parcel that is not noted is Tax Map 60, Parcel 56. (32.5.6a) 3. The plan notes that the zoning of the property is Rl. It is also zoned EC, Entrance Corridor Overlay District. This additional zoning must be noted on the plan. (32.5.6a) "'4. Widths of travelways are not shown. (32.5.6i and 32.6.6g) 5. Dimensions of existing improvements are not shown. (32.5.6n) 6. The plan notes that this is in the Jack Jouett district and in Virginia. The ordinance requires that the plan note that the project is also in Albemarle County. (32.5.6a) / 7. The present use of adjacent property is not noted. (32.5.6a) 8. Maximum acreage occupied by each use. This can be most easily accomplished by simply noting the square footage of the existing and proposed buildings. (32.5.6b) 9. Maximum footprint (in square feet) and dimensions of proposed improvements. (32.5.6n) 10. Note that the parking requirement of 309 spaces was established by the Zoning Administrator in a memo date May 12, 2008. This should replace note 15 on page 1 which references computations that are not provided on the plan as stated by the note. (32.5.6b, 32.6.6a and 32.6.6g) 11. At the time of signing the plans need to be sealed, signed and dated by a professional engineer or other individual licensed to prepare site plans. (32.6. 1) In addition to the above revisions the plan cannot be signed until the following approvals have been received. 1. Current Development Engineer approval. Max Greene is currently reviewing the plans and his comments are attached. 2. Albemarle County Fire & Rescue Department approval. The plans have been forwarded to James Barber. 3. ARB approval. The plan is under review by Margaret Maliszewski. If you need anything else or have any questions please let me know. Sincerely, William D. Fritz, AICP Chief of Current Development Cc: Cliff Harrison via address - clffhrrsn@aol.com Application #: �SDP200900008 2 -ho Review Ciomr nt$ Project Name: St Annes-Belfield Lower/Middle School - Final 7 Final — Non-residential —Administrative Date Completed: 03/16/2009 Reviewer: Bill Fritz CommDev-Current Development Review Status: Approved Reviews Comments: 'Ian submitted for signature. Signed 3/16/09 Date Completed: 02/20/2009 Reviewer: Gary Whelan ACSA Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: Summer, This email serves to confirm our phone conversation the other day that final construction drawings arel ready to be approved by the Service Authority. Therefore we are prepared to sign the mylars when they are submitted. The ACSA has reviewed the proposed development and has determined that as of this date there is an adequate supply of water and/or adequate sewer capacity to serve the development. Water and/or sewer connections to the ACSA system are allotted on a first-come, first-served basis at the time connection fees are paid. The ACSA does not reserve capacity in its system for a specific project. Approval of water and/or sewer utilities for this project does not constitute a guarantee of future service. 'Thanks. Pete Date Completed: 03/04/2009 Reviewer: James Barber Fire Rescue Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: Must comply with the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Must verify adequate fire flow is available. Approval is subject to field inspection and verification. Date Completed: 02/18/2009 Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: Based on plans revised February 10, 2009. No comments or conditions. Precise locations of barrier -free curb cuts will be determined during construction. Date Completed: 03/04/2009 Reviewer: Max Greene CommDev-Current Development Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: lEngineering concerns appear adequately addressed with this submittal. VDOT permits will be required for all work in the right of way. Date Completed: Reviewer: Review Status: Reviews Comments: Date Completed: Reviewer: Review Status: 02/25/2009 Max Greene Engineer Z&CD Requested Changes 02/19/2009 Margaret Maliszewski Requested Changes Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 Re�fiews Comments: Comments based on site plan with revision date of 2/10/09: Date Completed: Reviewer: Review Status: Reviews Comments: 11. Revise the Sheet index on C0.0 to include all the sheets in the swplan set 12. Add tree protection to C0.4. Ensure that it is coordinated with the landscape plan. 3. Proposed pole lights were not included on C1.0. Show the pole lights, ensure that they do not conflict with utilities and other site elements, and ensure coordination with the lighting plan. 4. The lighting plan includes a pole light at the lower school drop-off that is not shown on the site plan. Coordinate the plans. 5. Trees illustrated on C1.2 - C1.4 and C3.0 are not coordinated with the landscape plan. Coordinate all plans to show a single planting scheme. 02/25/2009 Margaret Maliszewski ARB Approved Revised sheets received 2/24 (no updated revision date on drawings) resolve outstanding issues. Date Completed: 02/25/2009 Reviewer: Summer Frederick Review Status: Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Isee Bill Fritz entry for comments Date Completed: Reviewer: Review Status: Reviews Comments: Planner Z&CD 02/12/2009 Summer Frederick Planner Z&CD Pending >ee Bill Fritz entry Page: 2.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Wednesday, March 18, 2009