The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200800169 Review Comments 2008-12-01Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District December 1, 2008 706 Forest St, Ste G Charlottesville, VA 22903 975-0224 TO:Megan Yaniglos Planning Department RE:Soils Report and Comments for: Eckman Property (AT & T) D 0 ILTA 7 -----,--. 1 . r-,,,,..__,-,i , ii .ic. ,-,=. ,,,,, 4 . - , — - ,.....: ). ..-.._ 44 r y e 1 1 YE 5„ 4E ;),,,,.):/.-, 3:::„:ilt4oe454444,n4 ,----) C ) '' r , 7 c;l 1 4 i c d'E s 19C }s- @tis i r r l K# 9 da'app V -35t in' j 3 .. 5 4 5 I4, r . xx 0 a y rt',5GB M1iff w 5:w $I 36C 1 v Y t 3J 1'1. k 2V y f 7 k , y 2r ; , tl ' 1. s I s tir a 4E •+r 19C °t,l{ 1 41 ek 4283 k : ct Y 314,4,44„;,,,,-4„, 18f a a t' y k r f 4 I ,7 1/27—",- \Rid H t t V . 3's i a 1 32y2003t o , P px ,\ y ' 4J 4IC_'+,., 4, * ut IdC fl798 :+}'T + I Ri, x.' i -,'v> ! I4Y 's+r 4 iC t 79$ d 8 ry ,,,Y x r 4D i 4 2 ' ' 77 i 999 14C 3'd9F ti;' 798 s G 3oD t 8.I _: Z' 36C " r C tT rM1 4 /+ / 'J , , R`\ ar J r` ` .; p ' L. ' s r it +,y i 98 i J t ( _ aj v • f i I ', 3 y3 1 3Fsi t i d f„A E 198 , r i,)f g 3:4tH j ° /' r.; - --/ Y ,"' 20:3 1 - I 'G • I. i 36C e1 f.,36::::ti 'n*,"~`",, f i / L„--1„,, ; ),/,),,,, 47 „ , t-' 4 '• ' . m 1 19C t 19):.;fir' I t 1 ym- t rs s v "'„'l r i ,r Ms ,' 1`1,G •. 156 1 c- jam. j i r _ y ,. „, _ Jj ` i p ti„ - I k I 1 5EE ,,. 1 4 I_ ix 2 J- . ', ' 4 _ll Ai . /-" 3"-- J ., j . L_"^ - J O T1 _, r 4i 1 USDA United States Natural Prepared by: Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Department of Resources Conservation District Agriculture Conservation 434 - 975 -0224 Service Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: AT & T / Eckman Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 19B Cullen loan, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Cullen is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a moderate shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 19C Cullen loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Cullen is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a moderate shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Small Commercial Buildings - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 19B Cullen loam, 2 to 7 percent Somewhat limited slopes 19C Cullen loam, 7 to 15 Very limited percent slopes Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 12/1/08 19B Cullen loam, 2 to 7 percent Not hydric slopes 19C Cullen loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes Soil Shrink - Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 19B Cullen loam, 2 to 7 percent 1.5 slopes 19C Cullen loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 19B Cullen loam, 2 to 7 percent Moderate slopes 19C Cullen loam, 7 to 15 Moderate percent slopes Corrosion Steel - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 19B Cullen loam, 2 to 7 percent High slopes 19C Cullen loam, 7 to 15 High percent slopes Thomas Jefferson SWCD 2 12/1/08 of , g1W, I I[3GI\' COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 December 2, 2008 Ms. Valerie Long 321 E Main Street Suite 400 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 RE: SDP- 2008 -169- Eckman Property /AT &T Tier I1 PWSF- Final Ms. Long: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Planning (E911) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Transportation Continents reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 1 1 " x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by December 15th, 2008. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of 565. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Megan Yaniglos Senior Planner Zoning d:. Current Development N kGhh County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Valerie Long (vlong @williamsmullen.com) From: Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date:December 2, 2008 Subject: SDP -2008 -169- Eckman Property- AT&T- Tier II PWSF- Final The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following continents are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. 5.1.40(d)(5)] Indicate on the plan sheets the maximum base and top diameter of the monopole. The base shall not be more than 30" in diameter and the top shall not be more than 18" in diameter. 2. 5.1.40 (a)(4)(e)] Show the topography within two thousand (2,000) feet of the proposed facility, in contour intervals not to exceed ten (10) feet for all lands within Albemarle County and, in contour intervals shown on USGS topographic survey maps or the best topographic data available. This topography can be the Counties GIS or from USGS maps. 3. 5.1.40 (c)(2)(ii)] Will there be any outdoor lighting for the maintenance of the facility? If so, all outdoor lighting shall be permitted only during maintenance periods; regardless of the lumens emitted, each outdoor luminaire shall be fully shielded as required by section 4.17 of the zoning ordinance. Provide information on the lighting for the facility. 4. 5.1.40 (d)(8)] On sheet A -1 it appears that the wiring and cables for the equipment are located on the outside of the pole. However, it is required that metal monopoles be constructed so that vertical cables, wiring and similar attachments are contained within the monopole's structure. 5. 32.5.6 (1)] There is an existing monitoring well shown on sheet A -1. Who owns /maintains this well? The County's Groundwater Manager did not believe it was the Albemarle County. Contact the monitoring entity of the well to make sure they are aware of the construction of this facility over the well, and will allow the facility to be located over the well. The type of access over the well will need to be determined by the monitoring entity. Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext 3004 for further information. 1 Application #: , SDP200800169 Short Review Corm - L.Ms Project Name:LEckman Property (AT &T CV379) - Prel Preliminary — Non - residential Date Completed:11/25/2008 Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911 Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: INO OBJECTION. Date Completed:12/02/2008 Reviewer:Brent Nelson ARB Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments: An ARB application for this proposal has been received and is scheduled for review at the 12/15/08 ARB meeting. The action taken by the board will be posted following the meeting. Date Completed:11/24/2008 Reviewer:Joan McDowell Planning Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: (There are no adjacent properties containing conservation easements or in an Agricultural and Forestal District. It does appear that the proposed tower would be located in VDOT right of way and may be visible from the Entrance Corridor. ARB staff comments will address visibility. Date Completed:12/01/2008 Reviewer:Philip Custer Engineer Z &CD Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: (Engineering review has no objection to the plan as proposed. Engineering review recommends that the existing road be upgraded to meet the County's minimum standards for lot access in Section 18- 4.6.6b. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Thursday, Decembei 04, 2008 f, Service Auth‘rity TO: Megan Yaniglos FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer DATE: November 20, 2008 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Ekman Property — AT &T SDP200800169 TM 87B -4 The below checked items apply to this site. X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: A. Water and sewer X B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service 2. A 4 inch water line is located approximately 200'distant. 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at 20 psi residual. 4. An inch sewer line is located approximately distant. 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7.and plans are currently under review. 8.and plans have been received and approved. X 9. No plans are required. 10. Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may /may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections. 13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. Comments: There are newly platted water easements for this property. The proposed site does not appear to conflict with the easements, but might interfere with the service lines. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations water line size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698 www.serviceauthoriy.org r COMMONWEALTH of \Fi R Q ThT iA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 DAVID S. EKERN, P.E. COMMISSIONER December 2 2005 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments December 4 2008 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the December 4` 2008 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP -2008 -00169 Eckman Property (AT &T CV379)- Prelim. (Megan Yaniglos) Show sight distances in accordance with the requirements of The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways at the existing entrances along Route 29 and Route 710. SDP -2008 -00170 American Legion Post 74 -Major (Summer Frederick) An entrance profile needs to be shown on the proposed entrance that meets the requirements of the CG -11 standard as shown in the VDOT Road and Bridge Standards. Show the sight distance on Route 22 in accordance with The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways. SDP - 2008 -00171 Free Bridge Office- Prelim. (Elizabeth Marotta) The minimum width requirements for commercial entrances as shown in 24VAC 30 -71 -160 are measured at the throat of the entrance. not the right of way line. The minimum width at the throat is 30 feet. The sight distance lines that fall outside of the right of way will require sight casements. According to the lateral setback requirements stated in VDOT's Road Design Manual. appendix A. page A -16, the minimum setback for the clear zone for WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING roads of 45 mph and less is to be 8 feet or the hack of the sidewalk. whichever is greater. The proposed street trees are within this clear zone and need to he removed. A clear zone easement should be provided for the minimum setback according to these requirements. Street trees are only permitted with the 3 foot offset when the design speed of the road is 20 mph or less. I would recommend placing the trees behind the sidewalk and providing the clear zone easement. Show the trips generated from the site. The plan needs to include the drainage computations for the changes that will affect the 36 inch RCP under Olympia Drive and the rest of the system that is affected. Show the entrance profile at the connection to Olympia Dr. SDP - 2008 -00279 Kenridge Section 3 Final No comments. SUB -2008 -00281 Old Trail Village Ctr (Blk 2, 1 -9 Lots) Final (Megan Yaniglos) No Comments. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434 -293 -0011 WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING J: i 7,p Megan Yaniglos8 ,-- likowt•,, MG1NW' COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 December 19, 2008 Valerie Long 0/0 Williams Mullen 321 E. Main St. #400 Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: ARB2008 -00158 Ekman (AT &T) Tax Map 87B, Parcel 4 Dear Ms. Long, The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on Monday, December 15, 2008. The Board, by a vote of 4:0, approved the request, pending staff administrative approval of the following conditions: 1. Revise all applicable application drawings to include notes indicating that the monopole, ground equipment, ice bridge, cables, and antennas will be painted SW #6090 Java Brown. Revise the applicable drawings to indicate the proposed diameter of the monopole at the top and base. The base shall be no wider than 30" and the top no wider than 18 ". If a lighting rod is proposed, the applicable drawings should be revised to show its location and dimensions. If one is not proposed, the applicable drawing should be revised to indicate that none is proposed. 2. Install seven (7) Virginia Red Cedars in 2 rows staggered, 12' on center, 6' — 8' tall at planting in the location of the currently proposed plantings. 3. Revise all applicable drawings to accurately show the existing drip line of all five (5) existing trees inventoried and to indicate if site grading is proposed. If none proposed, provide a note on the drawing indicating that no site grading beyond the concrete pad is to occur. Relocate the proposed tree protection as close as possible to the perimeter of the tree canopy it is to protect. Provide written verification from a certified arborist that all proposed grading and the grading and /or digging required to install the concrete pad, monopole, and underground power and telephone lines will not be detrimental to the health of the trees that are to remain. Include any additional recommendations from the arborist for maintaining the health of the trees on the drawings. Provide a tree conservation plan with measures limiting impacts on existing trees to remain. 4. If no additional exterior lighting is proposed, add a note to the applicable drawing indicating that no additional exterior lighting is proposed. If additional exterior lighting is proposed, revise the drawing to show the location, with the following note added to the drawing: The proposed light fixture will be shielded in accordance with Albemarle County requirements and operated by motion sensor. All proposed lightingisfor Please provide: 1. Two full sets of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated ARB revision dates on each drawing and an ARB approval signature panel. 2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval.3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution. When staff's review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, f3Rr0 ( 4 Brent Nelson Landscape Planner Cc: AT &T 4801 Cox Road Glen Allen, Va 23060 BC Architects 5659 Columbia Pike Falls Church, Va 22041 J & F Ekman Inc 3019 Monacan Trail Rd North Garden Va 22959 Megan Yaniglos, Senior Planner File o =® -, , RG fTd COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4012 February 12, 2009 Kathryn M. Carmichael Williams Mullen 321 E. Main St. Suite 400 Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: ARB2008 - 00158 Ekman (AT &T) Tax Map 87B, Parcel 4 Dear Ms. Carmichael: I have reviewed your revised submittal for the above - referenced project which consisted of the following: Drawings: Sheet T -1 Title Sheet, latest revision date 2/6/09 Sheet lof 2 Site Plan, latest revision date 9/3/08 Sheet 2 of 2 Site Plan, latest revision date 9/3/08 Sheet A -0A Area Plan, latest revision date 12/15/08 Sheet A -0 Site Plan, latest revision date 12/29/08 Sheet A -1 Compound Plan and Elevation, latest revision date 2/6/09 Sheet A -2 Equipment Layout, latest revision date 12/16/08 Sheet A -3 Foundation Details & Equipment Specs, latest revision date 10/29/08 Sheet A -4 Equipment Specs, latest revision date 10/29/08 Sheet A -5 Equipment Specs, latest revision date 10/29/08 Sheet A -6 Details, latest revision date 10/29/08 Sheet A -7 Sight Distance Analysis, latest revision date 12/29/08 Sheet A -8 Sight Distance Analysis, latest revision date 12/29/08 Sheet E &S 1 Erosion & Sediment Control Details, latest revision date 10/29/08 Sheet E &S 2 Erosion & Sediment Control Notes, latest revision date 10/29/08 The revisions included in this latest submission address all outstanding conditions of ARB approval. You may consider this letter your Certificate of Appropriateness. This approval is predicated on the fact that the design and materials, as proposed and exhibited for review, will be used. This application is approved with the condition that mechanical equipment shall not be visible from the Entrance Corridor. The acceptance of approval implies that the applicant has agreed to execute the design as indicated on the site plan, attachments, materials, samples, and other submittal items presented. Any change in the approved design or materials will require an amendment to the plan and must be reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Brent W. Nelson Landscape Planner cc: Megan Yaniglos, (via email) Senior Planner Albemarle County Valerie Long (via email) Williams Mullen ARB File