The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200800170 Review Comments 2008-12-01Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District December 1, 2008 706 Forest St, Ste G Charlottesville, VA 22903 975-0224 TO:Summer Frederick Planning Department RE:Soils Report and Comments for: American Legion Post 74 1 444 ,-- ' i-41k:i -, ,, /„'0:akie,,, 3 k aT ' x 71C' 1 236 r+ C `. ' ,i ti'. ,r 1'D ,236 44 t w 41,',, w 71C k1 t.,,,:,.,3 „ yo' d',..ata',, k ;d c 'x -± fie,k . c rn "RM'5,.# fit .. 1,h: 1 r ta 1 j Y 796 96,I I ' 1 s 726 2 61 3 a 3 IS 2C .3 013 7gB 7 2C 3.L; 7263 rn 73D n I \\, It'll': 26C3 1\x 6ty{ 796 ti0 58C Apia" e, M 23C w 71D i tik 72C3 796 236 C¢ {, 0 ,158Da 23C t 586 71a citalteiNio..11111110000.411Mih. ,..,V, 71D 5sc r slc J e 23C 58B ft'72C v ./ 5 5 2311 n, rF #406.....044.130.e 626 2/111 i11hddwyt 4‘11 "7 460 imr r r $cho,l s,ate n ' . 516 I /,, i.i Ili , f3C g s i\ V 83 51C i r. Stoo 5io y,.SS t 51C 1 , 806i' C' - w 51D ,626 1 y R , t 1111 MI lton 113e 510 S '` Y s i r • yg s i v 51C =40 1l", 83 itati51a^ss s 4 y- a ia 52E-o 95 628 Beym +.528 51 ,6?xe, .. x J ! ` \ , t` / 1L ' 1111118115fgyp7c 47/5 7,1C 511) Al— " t ID I ! 1 't' i II)Ilt i I af,(14% the U.S De lment of hII, Ii ,I i. (. ,( r „ ',from19770pal (111 pholoyl ay Coordinate qI IlI ticks (111(1 1(rm 111 I,, . , l 11 . i If shown al (' (Ipproxn1111 y p,, ,I1 l III I I Nt) 16 O' 30 USDA United States Neural Prepared by: Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Department of Resources Conservation District Agriculture Conservation 434 - 975 -0224 Service Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: American Legion Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 51B Manteo channery sit loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Manteo is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, shallow, somewhat excessively drained soil. Typically the surface layer is channery silt loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a very low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 58B Myersville silt loan, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Myersville is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is D. This soil is not hydric. Local Roads and Streets - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 51B Manteo channery silt Very limited loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes 58B Myersville silt loam, 2 to 7 Very limited percent slopes Soil Shrink - Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 12/1/08 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 51B Manteo channery silt 1.5 loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes 58B Myersville silt loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 51B Manteo channery silt Not hydric loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes 58B Myersville silt loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent slopes Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 51B Manteo channery silt High loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes 58B Myersville silt loam, 2 to 7 Moderate percent slopes Drainage Class - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 51B Manteo channery silt Somewhat excessively drained loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes 58B Myersville silt loam, 2 to 7 Well drained percent slopes Thomas Jetterson SWCD 2 12/1/08 OF qLB. a& ,?- COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 December 2, 2008 Kurt M Gloeckner, PE, PLS Via fax: 434.293.7612 RE: SDP2008 -170 American Legion Post 74 — Major Amendment Dear Mr. Gloeckner: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Planning (E911) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board) Virginia Department of Health Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by December 15, 2008. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Summer Frederick Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development tr II - r lira gyr- County of Albemarle Department of Community Development To:Kurt M Gloeckner, PE, PLS From: Summer Frederick, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date:December 1, 2008 Subject: SDP2008 -170 American Legion Post 74 — Major Amendment The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(a)] Please provide magisterial district on site plan. 2. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(a)] Please provide correct information for parcel located on the northern side of SR 22. Parcel TMP70 -10 has been subdivided. ,/ 3. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(b)] Please provide all required schedules for parcel, including; percent and acreage of open space, schedule of parking including maximum amount required and amount provided. 4. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(d), Sec. 18- 32.6.6(b)] Existing topography and proposed grading must be provided in such a manner as to be easily discernable. 5. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(e), Sec. 18- 32.5.6(p), 18- 32.6.6(i)] A landscape plan accurately showing existing landscape features, as well as proposed landscaping must be submitted. 6. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(m)] Please show distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection for both existing and proposed ingress /egress to /from property. 7. Sec. 18- 32.6.6(j)] A lighting plan showing outdoor lighting information including a photometric plan and location, description, and photograph or diagram of each type of outdoor luminaire must be submitted. / NOTE: The proposed construction must receive ARB approval prior to final site plan approval being granted./ Please contact Summer Frederick at the Department of Community Development 296- 5832 ext. 3565 for further information. 1 Application #:SDP200800170 Short Review Comn nts Project Name: American Legion Post 74 - Major Major Amendment Date Completed:11/25/2008 Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911 Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: , NO OBJECTION. Date Completed:11/24/2008 Reviewer:Joan McDowell Planning Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: No objections. Date Completed:11/18/2008 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: !plansBaseonlans revised November 3, 2008. Show the three new flag poles on the plan. Date Completed:11/21/2008 Reviewer.Max Greene Engineer Z &CD Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: SRC 12/4/08 Please show Curb cuts into the new Bio- filter area. Please add curb to the new road section. 18- 4.12.15.g E &SC plan and fee is required for final approval. SWM plan and fee is required for final approval. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Tuesday. December 02, 2008 COMMONWEALTH o f I R INL A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 DAVID S. EKERN, P.E. COMMISSIONER December 2 .008 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments December 4 2008 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT s comments on the Site Plans for the December 4 2008 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP - 2008 -00169 Eckman Property (AT &T CV379)- Prelim. (Megan Yaniglos) Show sight distances in accordance with the requirements of The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways at the existing entrances along Route 29 and Route 710. SDP - 2008 -00170 American Legion Post 74 -Major (Summer Frederick) An entrance profile needs to be shown on the proposed entrance that meets the requirements of the CG -11 standard as shown in the VDOT Road and Bridge Standards. Show the sight distance on Route 22 in accordance with The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways. SDP - 2008 -00171 Free Bridge Office - Prelim. (Elizabeth Marotta) The minimum width requirements for commercial entrances as shown in 24VAC 30 -71 -160 are measured at the throat of the entrance, not the right of way line. The minimum width at the throat is 30 feet. The sight distance lines that fall outside of the right of way will require sight easements. According to the lateral setback requirements stated in VDOT's Road Design Manual, appendix A, page A -16, the minimum setback for the clear zone for WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING roads of 45 mph and less is to be 8 feet or the hack of the sidewalk, whichever is greater. The proposed street trees are within this clear zone and need to be removed. A clear zone easement should be provided for the minimum setback according to these requirements. Street trees are only permitted with the 3 foot offset when the design speed of the road is 20 mph or less. I would recommend placing the trees behind the sidewalk and providing the clear zone easement. Show the trips generated from the site. The plan needs to include the drainage computations for the changes that will affect the 36 inch RCP under Olympia Drive and the rest of the system that is affected. Show the entrance profile at the connection to Olympia Dr. SDP - 2008 -00279 Kenridge Section 3 Final No comments. SUB - 2008 -00281 Old Trail Village Ctr (Blk 2, 1 -9 Lots) Final (Megan Yaniglos) No Comments. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434 -293 -0011 WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING of gat r County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Summer Frederick, Senior Planner From:Amy Pflaum, Engineering Review Division: Current Development Date:December 28, 2009 Subject: American Legion - Major Site Plan Amendment SDP200800170 The site plan amendment for the American Legion Post -74, submitted on November 20, 2009, has been reviewed. Current Development Engineering has the following comments: Site Plan Comments 1. The new travelway from Route 22 to the parking lot must be surfaced [18- 4.12.15.a], please use the VDOT Pavement Design Guide for Subdivisions to determine surface requirement. A waiver request must be submitted and approved in order to allow the use of untreated aggregate. [DM Policy] 2. Please add curb to the new travelway from Route 22 to the parking lot. A waiver request must be submitted and approved if curb is not to be used. [ 18- 4.12.15.g] 3. Guardrail is shown on the travelway detail and mentioned on the VDOT entrance permit application, however, it is not found on the plan. Please clarify. 4. The new entrance appears to drop away from Route 22 at greater than a 10% slope. An adequate landing or grade transition should be provided. As a guideline, the approach grade should not exceed 4% for a distance of not Tess than 40 -feet from the edge of Route 22. [ 18- 4.12.17.b] 5. VDOT approval is required prior to site plan amendment approval. 6. Are the 1 -foot curb openings labeled on the plan new or existing? Is the rip rap new or existing? If existing curb is to become a "level spreader ". please provide spot elevations on the curb showing that it meets the requirements of a level spreader and is constructed at a zero grade. VESCH 3.21] 7. It is unclear which existing bio- retention basin is being enlarged to accommodate addition of impervious area. Please provide a full detail (including volumes, embankments, outlet elevations) of the bio- retention basin. It is also unclear how extra run -off is being newly directed to the existing bio - filter. 8. Please submit a Water Protection Ordinance application for Erosion & Sediment Control and Stormwater Management along with required fees. A full review of stormwater management BMP's will be performed once this application and required details are submitted. WPO approval is required prior to site plan amendment approval. ti 0 \7 ALIJ , IJwC. f fkCIN COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 December 29, 2009 To: Kurt Gloeckner; Gloeckner Engineering via front desk pick -up CC: Randy Smith; American Legion via front desk pick - RE: SDP2008 -170 American Legion - Major Dear Sirs: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Planning (E911) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Historic Preservation) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Water Protection) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Health Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by January 12, 2010. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Summer Frederick Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development t /trc1' County of Albemarle Department of Community Development To:Kurt Gloeckner, PE, PLS via front desk pick -up CC:Randy Smith; American Legion via front desk pick -up From: Summer Frederick, Senior Planner Division: Current Development Date:December 28, 2009 Subject: SDP2008 -170 American Legion - Major The Planner for the Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. Sec. 18- 21.7(c)1] The proposed entrance is located within the required 20' undisturbed buffer zone on the west side of the project property. A waiver must be granted by the Planning Commission to allow disturbance within this area. Please submit a waiver application with all required information. 2. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(a)] Please provide accurate information for all adjacent parcels. TMP79 -10 has been subdivided, so information shown on plan is no longer accurate. 3. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(a)] All required setback and yard lines must be clearly identified on plan. Some setback lines are not complete. Some label arrows do not point to any lines. Please correct. 4. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(a)] Please make sure all boundary line dimension information is on plan. 5. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(c)] Please clearly outline area of proposed amendment on plan. 6. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(m)] Distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection must be shown for existing and proposed ingress to and egress from property. 7. VDOT approval of the plan is required prior to final approval. 8. ARB approval of the plan is required prior to final approval. Please contact Summer Frederick at the Department of Community Development 296- 5832 ext. 3565 for further information. 1 A AL/3„, 111 MIC utr,1h\ County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Summer Frederick, Senior Planner From:Amy Pflaum, Engineering Review Division: Current Development Date:December 28, 2009 Subject: American Legion - Major Site Plan Amendment SDP200800170 The site plan amendment for the American Legion Post -74, submitted on November 20, 2009, has been reviewed. Current Development Engineering has the following comments: Site Plan Comments 1. The new travelway from Route 22 to the parking lot must be surfaced [18-4.12.15.a], please use the VDOT Pavement Design Guide for Subdivisions to determine surface requirement. A waiver request must be submitted and approved in order to allow the use of untreated aggregate. [DM Policy] 2. Please add curh to the new travelway from Route 22 to the parking lot. A waiver request must be submitted and approved if curh is not to he used. [18-4.12.15.g] 3. Guardrail is shown on the travelway detail and mentioned on the VDOT entrance permit application. however, it is not found on the plan. Please clarify. 4. The new entrance appears to drop away from Route 22 at greater than a 10% slope. An adequate landing or grade transition should be provided. As a guideline. the approach grade should not exceed 4% for a distance of not less than 40 -feet from the edge of Route 22. [18-4.12.17.b] 5. VDOT approval is required prior to site plan amendment approval. 6. Are the 1 -foot curb openings labeled on the plan new or existing? Is the rip rap new or existing? If existing curh is to become a "level spreader'', please provide spot elevations on the curh showing that it meets the requirements of a level spreader and is constructed at a zero grade. VESCH 3.21] 7. It is unclear which existing bio- retention basin is being enlarged to accommodate addition of impervious area. Please provide a full detail (including volumes, embankments, outlet elevations) of the hio- retention basin. It is also unclear how extra run -off is being newly directed to the existing hio - filter. 8. Please submit a Water Protection Ordinance application for Erosion S. Sediment Control and Stormwater Management along with required fees. A full review of stormwater management BMP's will be performed once this application and required details are submitted. WPO approval is required prior to site plan amendment approval. Short Review Comments Application #' SDP200800170 Date Completed: 12/23/2009 Reviewer: Andrew Slack E911 Review Status: No Objection NO OBJECTION. Date Completed: 12/17/2009 Reviewer: James Barber Fire Rescue Review Status: No Objection Must comply with the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Final approval is subject to field inspection and verification. Date Completed: 12/17/2009 Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status: No Objection Based on plans dated November 16, 2009. No further comments or conditions. Date Completed: 12/22/2009 Reviewer: Margaret Maliszewski ARB Review Status: Requested Changes ARB approval of this proposal is required prior to final site plan approval. An ARB application is required. Applications, checklists, schedules and guidelines are available on line at www.albemarle.org. e AL N County of Albemarle Department of Community Development To:Kurt M Gloeckner, PE, PLS trA _ 2, t t L va4 -) From: Summer Frederick, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date:May 20, 2009 Subject: SDP2008 -170 American Legion Post 74 — Major Amendment The Planner for the Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] NOTE: This is the second review comment letter. None of the comments listed below have been addressed. Additional comments have been added in bold. 1 ,) [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(a)] Please provide magisterial district on site plan. 2 Sec. 18- 32.5.6(a)] Please provide correct information for parcel located on the northern side of SR 22. Parcel TMP70 -10 has been subdivided. 3. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(b)] Please provide all required schedules for parcel, including; percent and acreage of open space, schedule of parking including maximum amount required and amount provided. 4. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(d), Sec. 18- 32.6.6(b)] Existing topography and proposed grading must be provided in such a manner as to be easily discernable. 5. [Sec. 18- 32.5.6(e), Sec. 18- 32.5.6(p), 18- 32.6.6(i)] A landscape plan accurately showing existing landscape features, as well as proposed landscaping must be 66. submitted. Sec. 18- 32.5.6(m)] Please show distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection for both existing and proposed ingress /egress to /from property. 7. Sec. 18- 32.6.6(j)] A lighting plan showing outdoor lighting information including a photometric plan and location, description, and photograph or diagram of each type of outdoor luminary must be submitted. 8. Please remove any circles that do not include information to be reviewed for this application. 9. The landscape note refer to page 3 of 5 — there are no additional pages corresponding to these numbers in this submission. 10. Please provide enough additional copies to be sent to other required reviewers. NOTE: The proposed construction must receive ARB approval prior to final site plan approval being granted. Please contact Summer Frederick at the Department of Community Development 296- 5832 ext. 3565 for further information. 1