Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200800127 Review Comments 2008-08-21Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District August 21, 2008 2134 Berkmar Dr Charlottesville, VA 22901 975-0224 TO: Summer Frederick Planning Department RE: Soils Report and Comments for: SOCA Fieldhouse CQ wd; w'Cx ,-a w NN mx" Y` V C-�Y. * % ..}/`=,•Q: ,:,` w ,` Y n '., h .. ,Z'Ut *. ,�:x..'" w - b CD w Z N "O • y0 ;.rte N ti ;D' 14 Ila co ID ,s� �ol co w : Y''�.` N NW' W (7 v16 £ t0 m � �w� �N N ,x�� i.: '•�- .fir (�`����) L'�• - .rte W � 34 • � Q � 'g .d, �:t � .. V t0 Dov W co DO W"'s* Oo tw cm) W v W n m Oo w.; N 03 w .. v ;'i. V :,v^ ' c. OO '. •? A. ';tri O N n to ?.. h ;.. OD ca CD IQ t'Y, •9.�' ° .s � N Ca ;�:, ., � V �� h � .._�n •fie ,¢'�'A �.+ .. � '� V h N C3 "'"., .."tea T'k� iV •`� r: ,l.t� � ,�' •� �� h r " v. • 39C� - N '� ��*✓hr t• A � N N O a F 39C 41 _USDA United States Natural �— Department of Resources _ Agriculture Conservation Service Prepared by: Thorrm Jefferson Soil & Water Conservation District 434-975-0224 Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: SOCA Fieldhouse Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 16 Chewacla silt loam Description Category: Virginia FOTG Chewacla is a nearly level to gently sloping, very deep, somewhat poorly drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is occasionally flooded and is not ponded. The top of the seasonal high water table is at 12 inches. The land capability classification is 3w. The Virginia soil management group is I. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 19B Cullen loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Cullen is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a moderate shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 19C Cullen loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Cullen is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a moderate shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit. 20C3 Cullen clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded Description Category: Virginia FOTG Cullen is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a moderate shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 20D3 Cullen clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded Description Category: Virginia FOTG Cullen is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a moderate shrink swell potential. This soil is not Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 8/21/08 flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit. 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Elioak is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately slow. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit. 27C Elioak loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Elioak is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 8 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately slow. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 39D Hazel loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hazel is a moderately steep to steep, moderately deep, excessively drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 10 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 40E Hazel very stony loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hazel is a steep, moderately deep, excessively drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 10 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit. 83 Toccoa fine sandy loan Description Category: Virginia FOTG Toccoa is a nearly level to gently sloping, very deep, moderately well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is fine sandy loam about 9 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is occasionally flooded and is not ponded. The top of the seasonal high water table is at 45 inches. The land capability classification is 2w. The Virginia soil management group is II. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 95 Weharlkee silt loam Description Category: Virginia FOTG Wehadkee is a nearly level to gently sloping, very deep, poorly drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loam about 10 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is occasionally flooded and is not ponded. The top of the seasonal high water table is at 15 inches. The land capability classification is 4w. The Virginia soil management group is MM. This soil is hydric. Thomas Jefferson SWCD 2 8/21/08 Shallow Excavations - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Symbol Soil Name Map 16 Chewacla silt loam Partially hydric Symbol Soil Name Rating 16 Chewacla silt loam Very limited 19B Cullen loam, 2 to 7 percent Somewhat limited Not hydric slopes 19C Cullen loam, 7 to 15 Somewhat limited Not hydric percent slopes 20C3 Cullen clay loam, 7 to 15 Somewhat limited Not hydric percent slopes, severely 27C Elioak loam, 7 to 15 eroded percent slopes 20D3 Cullen clay loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes, severely eroded 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent Somewhat limited slopes 27C Elioak loam, 7 to 15 Somewhat limited percent slopes 39D Hazel loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes 40E Hazel very stony loam, 25 Very limited to 45 percent slopes 83 Toccoa fine sandy loam Somewhat limited 95 Wehadkee silt loam Very limited Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 16 Chewacla silt loam Partially hydric 19B Cullen loam, 2 to 7 percent Not hydric slopes 19C Cullen loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 200 Cullen clay loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes, severely eroded 20D3 Cullen clay loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes, severely eroded 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent Not hydric slopes 27C Elioak loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes Phomas Jetferson SWCD 3 8/21/08 39D Hazel loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes 40E Hazel very stony loan, 25 Not hydric to 45 percent slopes Distribution 83 Toccoa fine sandy loam Partially hydric 95 Wehadkee silt loam All hydric Soil Shrink -Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth: 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Map Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Rating Map Moderate 19B Cullen loam, 2 to 7 percent Symbol Soil Name Rating 16 Chewacla silt loam 1.5 19B Cullen loam, 2 to 7 percent 1.5 slopes 19C Cullen loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 200 Cullen clay loam, 7 to 15 4.5 percent slopes, severely eroded 20133 Cullen clay loam, 15 to 25 4.5 percent slopes, severely eroded 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent 1.5 slopes 27C Elioak loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 39D Hazel loam, 15 to 25 1.5 percent slopes 40E Hazel very stony loam, 25 1.5 to 45 percent slopes 83 Toccoa fine sandy loam 1.5 95 Wehadkee silt loam 1.5 Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 16 Chewacla silt loam Moderate 19B Cullen loam, 2 to 7 percent Moderate slopes 19C Cullen loam, 7 to 15 Moderate percent slopes 20C3 Cullen clay loam, 7 to 15 Moderate Phomas Jetterson SWCD 4 8/21/08 Corrosion Steel - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia percent slopes, severely Status: Published eroded 20133 Cullen clay loam, 15 to 25 Moderate percent slopes, severely Symbol Soil Name eroded 16 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent Moderate Cullen loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes 27C Elioak loam, 7 to 15 Moderate Cullen loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 39D Hazel loam, 15 to 25 High Cullen clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes 40E Hazel very stony loam, 25 High eroded to 45 percent slopes 20133 83 Toccoa fine sandy loam Moderate 95 Wehadkee silt loam Moderate Corrosion Steel - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 16 Chewacla silt loam High 19B Cullen loam, 2 to 7 percent High slopes 19C Cullen loam, 7 to 15 High percent slopes 20C3 Cullen clay loam, 7 to 15 High percent slopes, severely eroded 20133 Cullen clay loam, 15 to 25 High percent slopes, severely eroded 27B Elioak loam, 2 to 7 percent High slopes 27C Elioak loam, 7 to 15 High percent slopes 39D Hazel loam, 15 to 25 Low percent slopes 40E Hazel very stony loam, 25 Low to 45 percent slopes 83 Toccoa fine sandy loam Low 95 Wehadkee silt loam High Thomas Jetterson SWCD 5 8/21/08 ,~ �%kGINIP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 July 31, 2007 Mr. Chris Schooley Stonehaus Development 2421 Ivy Road, Charlottesville, Va. 22903 Subject: Belvedere, ZMA 2004-017 Dear Chris, I am in receipt of your letter of July 23rd requesting modifications to the subject ZMA to allow 1) a 39,000 square foot SOCA owned and controlled fieldhouse, and 2) an 8,000 square foot private school, both to be located in Block 4, the Neighborhood Center. In reviewing the Code of Development, I can approve such an alteration if I find "... the alterations better respond to neighborhood interests at the time of construction." That is the standard that must be satisfied. I am advising you that these uses can be allowed in Block 4, but only after the following is satisfied: 1. As part of this modification, please provide written justification as to how this proposal is consistent with Zoning Ordinance Section 20A.9 Green Spaces, Amenities, Conservation Areas and Preservation Areas. 2. As part of this modification, it is necessary to demonstrate how the amenities to be provided for Belvedere residents in Block 4 are being provided in alternative locations within Belvedere with similar convenience to the residents. I recognize you mentioned locating a pool and other program elements in other areas, but your letter provided no commitments or assurances that those elements would be provided. With respect to convenience, a major benefit of the Neighborhood Center was the central location that placed a large number of residents within a '/ mile of the center, greatly enhancing the pedestrian orientation of this development. I would expect to see some demonstration of a similar level of convenience to the residents with the alternative plan. 3. As part of this modification, it is necessary to demonstrate how the alternative amenities will be constructed in a comparable timeframe. You mentioned that Fairview is offering a minimum of 100 memberships to Belvedere residents. I believe that could be considered acceptable for those first homes, but I need to see some proof of that arrangement. Next, recognizing 100 memberships would only serve a small percentage of the total Belvedere development, it is necessary to demonstrate that the construction of the alternative amenities will happen in the same timeframe as development occurs. 4. With respect to substituting the fieldhouse for the tennis courts, we would need to see some evidence that the fieldhouse will be available for the use of Belvedere residents as a recreational amezi:ry. If you were referring to the proposed sour stadium, please provide evidence that this facility would be available for Belvedere residents as a recreational amenity. With the site plans, it will be necessary to demonstrate that all code requirements are being satisfied, including parking. Parking could be satisfied through a combination of shared parking, on -street parking, and dedicated parking lot, but it will be necessary to demonstrate this has been satisfied. Similarly, with the school, will this include a school playground and where will this be provided on the site? In summary, I believe these proposed uses are within the limits of what the Director of Community Development is authorized to modify, though it is clearly stretching that limit. To me, the intent of the language clearly anticipates substitution of uses to support Belvedere, not the community at large. In approving this alteration, I must see that Belvedere is still receiving the amenities intended under the plan. If there is interest in moving forward with this modification, I recommend you give me a call and we can schedule a meeting of County staff and other parties to make sure there is a clear understanding of what is needed to approve it for approval. Sincerely, Mark B. Graham, P.E. Director of Community Development Cc: Ken Boyd, Chairman of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors David Slutsky, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, Rio District Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning Amelia McCulley, Zoning Administrator Bob Hauser, Trustee, Belvedere Station Land Trust John Desmond, Trustee, Belvedere Station Land Trust Bill Mueller, Executive Director, SOCA Sean Dougherty, Senior Planner, Albemarle County Summer Frederick, Senior Planner, Albemarle County � IRGI�ZP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 September 17, 2007 Mr. Chris Schooley Stonehaus Development 2421 Ivy Road, Charlottesville, Va. 22903 Subject: Belvedere, ZMA 2004-017 Dear Chris, I am in receipt of your letter of August 7th that follows up on the request to allow 1) a 39,000 square foot SOCA owned and controlled fieldhouse, and 2) an 8,000 square foot private school, both to be located in Block 4, the Neighborhood Center. My response to each point in your letter is listed below. 1. Based on my review of the submitted material, my concern with section 20 A.9 of the Zoning Ordinance is satisfied. 2. Based on my review of the submitted material, my concern with amenities being provided with similar convenience is satisfied. 3. Based on my review of the submitted material, my concerns with providing alternative amenities will be satisfied by provision of additional Fairview Swim and Tennis Club memberships, the pool to be provided with the Belvedere Town Center, and the other other amenities provided in the development, with the understanding these facilities will be provided concurrently with phases of the development. 4. Based on my review of the submitted material, I do not believe the fieldhouse or school can be considered a substitution for the previously shown tennis courts. There is no assurance that either of those facilities will provide a similar level of use for Belvedere residents. That said, I will allow this substitution with the understanding that the proposed multipurpose synthetic turf soccer field and natural grass soccer fields will be available to Belvedere residents. I note that the soccer fields will require special use permits and staff will recommend special use permit conditions assuring the Belvedere residents reasonable use of those fields in order to provide a similar amenity. I recognize the County Board of Supervisors may establish a different condition for those soccer fields, but in doing so they are effectively affirming their expectation for a recreational amenity with Belvedere. 5. Based on my review of the submitted material, I agree that on -street parking can be considered as part of the site plans. My original comment was intended to clarify that no waivers or modifications of zoning requirements is being made by this determination. As previously stated, this can be addressed as part of the site plan. ('pct [CT'i ttr e uLw"t� With the above clarification, i n advising you that the requested uses can ty`allowed in Block 4. Sincerely, Mark B. Graham, P.E. Director of Community Development Cc: Ken Boyd, Chairman of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors David Slutsky, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, Rio District Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning Amelia McCulley, Zoning Administrator Bob Hauser, Trustee, Belvedere Station Land Trust John Desmond, Trustee, Belvedere Station Land Trust Bill Mueller, Executive Director, SOCA Sean Dougherty, Senior Planner, Albemarle County Summer Frederick, Senior Planner, Albemarle County f�E r >RGLNL� COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 September 3, 2008 Eugene Ryang McKee Carson Via email: eryang@mckeecarson.com RE: SDP2008-127 SOCA Fieldhouse - Preliminary Dear Mr. Ryang: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Planning (E911) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Historic Preservation) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Water Protection) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Health Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11 " x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by September 15, 2008. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Summer Frederick Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development ---]Short Review Corr-ients Application #: SDP20080012 Project Nam e:1 SOCA-Field house-frel i mi nary rreliminary — Non-residential Date Completed: 09/02/2008 Reviewer: Amy Pflaum Engineer Z&CD Review Status: Requested Changes Reviews Comments: I,SRC 9/4/08 Date Completed: 08/25/2008 Reviewer: Andrew Slack E911 Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: NO OBJECTION. i Date Completed: 08/26/2008 Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status: Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Based on plans dated August 11, 2008. l Provide van -accessible barri r -free parking, and indicate the accessible route from the parking area to the building entrance. Based on the number of parking spaces shown, one of them must be barrier -free. Portions of the building must be protected by a sprinkler system. Show the dedicated fire water line on the plan. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Thursday, September 04, 2008 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Eugene Ryang; McKee Carson From: Summer Frederick Division: Zoning & Current Development Date: September 3, 2008 Subiect: SDP2008-127 SOCA Fieldhouse - Preliminary The Planner/Engineer for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(a)] Please include reference to all rezonings and variations that apply to this project. 2. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(a)] Include one datum reference for elevation. 3. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(a)] The source of survey needs to be specified on plans. 4. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(a)] Information regarding all adjacent parcels must include the following: owner name, current zoning designation, tax map and parcel number, and present use of parcel. 5. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(b)] Please include maximum acreage or square footage occupied for all uses proposed for site. This is to include office, caf6, soccer fields, and any other uses. 6. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(b)] The maximum number of employees must be specified on plan. 7. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(b)] Please clarify calculations provided in parking schedule. Additionally, the number of parking spaces provided on-site is not adequate for the anticipated intensity of use. 8. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(b)] Please provide maximum amount of paved parking area and vehicular circulation area. 9. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(e)] All existing landscape features must be shown. 10. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(m)] Please clearly identify proposed ingress to and egress from the proposed facility, and show the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection. 11. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(n)] Location of outdoor trash containers and lighting must be included on plan. 12. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(p)] Please provide a landscape plan with completed calculations and all required information. 13. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(q)] Please provide estimated traffic generation figures for the site based on current VDOT rates. Please indicate the estimated vehicles per day and direction of travel for all connections to a public road. Please contact Summer Frederick at the Department of Community Development 296- 5832 ext. 3565 for further information. County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Summer Frederick, Planner From: Amy Pflaum, Engineering Review Division: Current Development Date: August 29, 2008 Subject: SDP200800127, SOCA Fieldhouse - Preliminary The preliminary site plan for the SOCA Fieldhouse, received on 12 August 2008, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development can recommend approval once the following items are adequately addressed: 1. Plans need to he stamped and signed by a licensed professional. 2. Please provide benchmark information on the plans. 3. Please designate the proposed dumpster location on the plan. 4. Please verify that the pipe from the existing storm drain is sized to carry overflow from the cistern. 5. Sheet 02 specifies 88 parking spaces are required; however, only 18 spaces are shown on the plans. Please specify and show all required parking spaces on the plans. 6. Please label the public access easement over Colvin Alley with the deed book and page number. 7. Please label all existing drainage easements with the deed book and page number. The following comments will need to be addressed before the final site plan can be approved: 8. The owner of this site needs to be a party to the Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement for the biofilter. 9. VDOT approval is needed for work within the VDOT right-of-way. r ice Auth6rit _ TO: Summer Frederick FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer DATE: August 23, 2008 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: SOCA Fieldhouse -Preliminary SDP200800127 TM 62A3-1 The below checked items apply to this site. X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2. A 12 inch water line is located approximately 140' distant. 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at 20 psi residual. X 4. An 8 inch sewer line is located on site 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7. and plans are currently under review. 8. and plans have been received and approved. X 9. No plans are required. 10. Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may/may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval for water and/or sewer connections. 13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. Comments: Backflow prevention is required. Provide a plumbing fixture count to size the meter. Show proposed meter location. Fire protection may require water plans. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations water line size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977-4511 • Fax (434) 979-0698 www. se rviceau thoriy. org County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Summer Frederick, Planner From: Amy Pflaum, Engineering Review Rev. 1 John P. Diez Division: Current Development Date: August 29, 2008 Rev. 1 October 24, 2008 Rev. 2 December 4, 2009 Rev. 3 March 24, 2010 Subject: SDP200800127, SOCA Fieldhouse - Preliminary The preliminary site plan for the SOCA Fieldhouse, received on March 4, 2009, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development can recommend approval once the following items are adequately addressed: 5. Sheet 02 specifies 88 parking spaces are required, however, only 18 spaces are shown on the plans. Please specify and show all required parking spaces on the plans. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. The resubmitted plans now state that 90 spaces are required. However, only 50 spaces are shown on the plans. Please specify and show all required parking spaces on the plans. (Rev 3.) Street sections approved with ZMA200400007 describe Cole and Colbert Streets as having "Informal Parking", but no parking lane dimensions are shown. Approved street plans for these two streets, show 2 14 -foot wide travel lanes, parking is not mentioned. Zoning Administrator must determine if these required parking spaces may use the Informal Parking anticipated on the streets. The following comments will need to be addressed before the final site plan can be approved: ��ti pF AL(1� y� 17 GI 0 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Summer Frederick, Planner From: Amy Pflaum, Engineering Review Rev. 1 John P. Diez Division: Current Development Date: August 29, 2008 Rev. 1 October 24, 2008 Subject: SDP200800127, SOCA Fieldhouse - Preliminary The preliminary site plan for the SOCA Fieldhouse, received on 21 October 2008, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development can recommend approval once the following items are adequately addressed: fI . Plans need to be stamped and signed by a licensed professional. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed 2. Please provide benchmark information on the plans. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed r • 3. Please designate the proposed dumpster location on the plan. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed 4. Please verify that the pipe from the existing storm drain is sized to carry overflow from the cistern. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed 5. Sheet 02 specifies 88 parking spaces are required; however, only 18 spaces are shown on the plans. Please specify and show all required parking spaces on the plans. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. The resubmitted plans now state that 90 spaces are required. However, only 50 spaces are shown on the plans. Please specify and show all required parking spaces on the plans. 6. Please label the public access easement over Colvin Alley with the deed book and page number. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed fZ8. Please verify and label the kind of surface that will be used in the hatched area by the terrace. Has this been included in the impervious surface calculations? 9 The following comments will need to be addressed before the final site plan can be approved: 9. The owner of this site needs to be a party to a Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement for the biofilter with the owner of Parcel K (Open Space). 10. VDOT approval is needed for work within the VDOT right-of-way. COMMONWEALTH VIRCjINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 DAVID S. EKERN, P.E. COMMISSIONER September 3, 2008 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments September 4'h, 2008 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the September 4'h, 2008 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP -2008-00127 SOCA Fieldhouse —Preliminary (Summer Frederick) • This plan connects to previously approved roads within the Belvedere development. It does not proposed any changes to the approved roads. SDP -2008-00129 Stonewater'rownhomes — Final (Elizabeth Marotta) • The proposed road plans and road improvement plans have not yet been approved. Approval of this plan should be contingent upon approval of the road plans. SUB -2008-00092 AOC Subdivision- Final (Summer Frederick) • The lots have access to Route 649 by an entrance that was constructed with the Route 649 road plan by VDOT. No alterations to the access are proposed on this subdivision. SUB -2008-00203 Old Trail Village Block 3 — Final (Megan Yaniglos) • The site plan for this plat is not yet approved. However, changes to the site plan should not affect the plat. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re -submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Residency Program Manager VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434-293-0011 WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Summer Frederick, Planner From: Amy Pflaum, Engineering Review Rev. 1 John P. Diez Division: Current Development Date: August 29, 2008 Rev. 1 October 24, 2008 Subject: SDP200800127, SOCA Fieldhouse - Preliminary The preliminary site plan for the SOCA Fieldhouse, received on 21 October 2008, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development can recommend approval once the following items are adequately addressed: 1. Plans need to be stamped and signed by a licensed professional. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed 2. Please provide benchmark information on the plans. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed 3. Please designate the proposed dumpster location on the plan. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed 4. Please verify that the pipe from the existing storm drain is sized to carry overflow from the cistern. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed 5. Sheet 02 specifies 88 parking spaces are required, however, only 18 spaces are shown on the plans. Please specify and show all required parking spaces on the plans. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. The resubmitted plans now state that 90 spaces are required. However, only 50 spaces are shown on the plans. Please specify and show all required parking spaces on the plans. Please label the public access easement over Colvin Alley with the deed book and page number. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed 8. Please verify and label the kind of surface that will be used in the hatched area by the terrace. Has this been included in the impervious surface calculations? The following comments will need to be addressed before the final site plan can be approved: 9. The owner of this site needs to be a party to a Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement for the biofilter with the owner of Parcel K (Open Space). 10. VDOT approval is needed for work within the VDOT right-of-way. County of Albemarle Department of Community Development To: Eugene Ryang; McKee Carson CC: LJ Lopez; Stonehaus From: Summer Frederick, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date: November 17, 2008 Subject: SDP2008-127 SOCA Fieldhouse - Preliminary The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(a)] Please include reference to all rezonings and variations that 2. apply to this project. This comment was not addressed. The specific ZMA and variation applicable to this project must be listed on the plan. 11. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(b)] The maximum number of employees must be specified on 12. plan. There are two MAX NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES now listed on the plan. One lists 12, and the other lists TO BE DETERMINED. Please provide correct to show correct maximum number of employees. 13. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(b)] Please clarify calculations provided in parking schedule. 14. Additionally, the number of parking spaces provided on-site is not adequate for 15. the anticipated intensity of use. The number of spaces shown on the plan does not provide for minimum number of required spaces. Please revise plan to include minimum number of required spaces either on property or on immediately adjacent streets. 22. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(n)] Location of outdoor trash containers and lighting must be 23. included on plan. This comment has been partially addressed. Please provide required information regarding outdoor lighting. 24. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(p)] Please provide a landscape plan with completed calculations 25. and all required information. The planting schedule numbers do not match the graphic depiction of proposed landscaping. Please correct. 26. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(q)] Please provide estimated traffic generation figures for the 27. site based on current VDOT rates. Please indicate the estimated vehicles per day and direction of travel for all connections to a public road. Please provide direction of travel for all connections to a public street. Please contact Summer Frederick at the Department of Community Development 296- 5832 ext. 3565 for further information. County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Summer Frederick, Senior Planner From: Amelia McCulley, Zoning Administrator Division: Zoning Date: September 16, 2009 Subject: SOCA Fieldhouse Parking Plan I have reviewed the two plan sheets for the SOCA Fieldhouse parking plan. I will need additional information and details to complete my review. Please ask the applicant to revise the plan to reflect the following: 1. Remove "shared parking" from the proposed parking lot because it implies a current County approval. Until a parking study is reviewed and approved proposing another use which has different peak hour parking usage, shared parking is not approved. How will disabled people get from the handicapped parking spaces to the building? 2. 1 am concerned about the assumption that basically all of the on -street parking on Coles West will be available for this use. In addition, some of this area is already designated for on -street parking to serve the townhouses. 3. Please provide a plan at a larger scale than either of the two plans submitted. The "Parking Layout County Exhibit" does not have a scale. It is not possible to review details necessary to assure that parking standards are met at the current scale. 4. Please recalculate the basement fitness parking requirement. By my calculation, it requires 28 spaces, not 26. 5. Please provide measurements to include the following: a. proposed parking space dimensions; b. Colvin Alley travelway dimensions; c. Coles West and Butler Street dimensions. ALS tJ County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Summer Frederick, Senior Planner Amy Pflaum, Senior Civil Engineer From: Amelia McCulley, Zoning Administrator Division: Zoning Date: November 30, 2009 Subject: SDP 2008-127 SOCA Fieldhouse - Final I have reviewed the latest revision with letter dated 11-05-09 and have the following comments: 1. Zoning Ordinance Section 4.12.16 c 2 requires parallel parking spaces to be a minimum width of 9 feet and perpendicular spaces to be a minimum of 10 feet wide with a narrow travelway (listed at 20 feet). This site plan proposes parallel spaces as narrow as 5 ft and 5.5 ft. Approval as proposed necessitates approval of a modification (per Section 4.12.2.c2) made by the Zoning Administrator in consultation with the Engineer. Because this represents over a 40% reduction in parallel parking space width (9 to 5 feet), I suggest we consider whether we should advise them of our minimum acceptable width even before they submit the waiver request, or whether we wait and respond once it is submitted. I'm obviously attempting to avoid the back -and -forth if we already know their proposal does not meet established engineering standards and cannot be supported. c. Minimum parking space sire. Parking spaces shall be the minimum sizes, and have the minimum aisle width, provided below: 1. perpendicular parking. For perpendicular parking, the minimum space and aisle widths shall be: Width (ft.) Length (ft.) Aisle Width (ft.) 10 18 20 9 18 24 2. Parallel parking. For parallel parking, the minimum space shall be: Width (ft.) Length (ft.) 9 20 2. Some of these roads currently have "no parking" signs posted. It is important that they not show on -street parking on these roads without some explanation of how it will be allowed given the current signage. 3. Clarify with notes on the plan, which sidewalks are "proposed" and will be built with this plan. Due to the extent of off-site parking, it is important to see how pedestrian will travel to the Fieldhouse from the parking. j1� pF ALy�lr .: cY a� � ♦�1;3�p County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Summer Frederick, Planner From: Amy Pflaum, Engineering Review Rev. 1 John P. Diez Division: Current Development Date: August 29, 2008 Rev. 1 October 24, 2008 Rev. 2 December 4, 2009 Subject: SDP200800127, SOCA Fieldhouse - Preliminary The preliminary site plan for the SOCA Fieldhouse, received on 13 November 2009, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development can recommend approval once the following items are adequately addressed: 3. Please designate the proposed dumpster location on the plan. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. (Rev. 2) Comment has not been addressed. Any commercial or industrial building of four thousand (4000) gross square feet or more shall provide a dumpster pad. [18-4.12.13e] 4. Please verify that the pipe from the existing storm drain is sized to carry overflow from the cistern. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. (Rev. 2) Comment has not been addressed. Please verify the existing 30" RCP (ID: D-106 to D-105). Sheet 02 specifies 88 parking spaces are required; however, only 18 spaces are shown on the plans. Please specify and show all required parking spaces on the plans. (Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. The resubmitted plans now state that 90 spaces are required. However, only 50 spaces are shown on the plans. Please specify and show all required parking spaces on the plans. (Rev. 2) Comment has not been addressed. Parallel parking spaces must be 9' x 20' (with a minimum aisle width of 20'. In addition, sidewalks abutting parking must be 6' wide (exclusive of curb), or bumper blocks are provided. Please refer to the Design Standards Manual. The following comments will need to be addressed before the final site pian can be approved: County of Albemarle Department of Community Development To: Brajesh Tiwari; McKee Carson via email: btiwari@mckeecarson.com From: Summer Frederick, Senior Planner Division: Current Development Date: March 24, 2010 Subiect: SDP2008-127 SOCA Fieldhouse - Preliminary The Planner for the Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(a)] Information regarding the Belvedere Code of Development (COD) must be updated to reflected the latest approval dates for both the COD and applicable variations. 2. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(a)] Please include appropriate zoning district reference information for all adjacent parcels. Residential is not a zoning district reference, it is a use reference. 3. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(b)] Information provided for site area, open space area, etc must be consistent, and must not include information regarding a `Future Montessori School'. Only information regarding proposed, or existing development may be included for review. Information regarding future development, not currently proposed, will not be reviewed nor may it be considered in the current review. Please remove all reference to a future Montessori school. 4. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(b)] The schedule of parking, as well as the layout of parking must be approved by the Zoning Administrator. 5. [Sec. 18-32.5.6(m)] If any outdoor lighting is to be included on-site, all required information must be included in this plan. 6. Information regarding approved parking for townhouses is incorrect. Provided information must accurately reflect approvals associated with site plans for townhouse development. Please include correct information, to be found within County approved site plan files. Please contact Summer Frederick at the Department of Community Development 296- 5832 ext. 3565 for further information. Summer Frederick From: DeNunzio, Joel D., P.E. [Joel.DeNunzio@VDOT.virginia.gov] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:07 AM To: Amelia McCulley Cc: Amy Pflaum; Summer Frederick Subject: RE: SOCA Belvedere - on -street parking question Amelia, The 28 foot wide roadways were approved because the traffic projections on these streets are below 400 vehicles per day. Assuming there is parking permitted on both sides of the road at 7 foot wide parking lanes for a residential area, there are two 7 foot lanes to accommodate two lanes of travel. This type of situation works fine when it is a residential area with very low traffic because it assumes that most parking will still be accommodated off-street and the on -street parking will be intermittent. With intermittent parking along the street, there is plenty of opportunity for opposing traffic to pass in the openings between parked cars and the ordinarily low volumes have a low occurrence of opposing traffic throughout the day. The SP appears to utilize all the on -street parking spaces on these residential streets and allow no opportunity for opposing traffic to adequately pass. This proposal appears to qualify the streets for a higher standard, maybe in the range of 401-2000 vehicles per day and require a 36 foot pavement. With 36 feet there will be two 7 foot parking lanes and two 11 foot travel lanes. This type of design will safely accommodate the proposed parking and travel needs. If the SP is approved utilizing the on -street parking, it is very likely that we will see functional problems on the street during the events at the complex. If VDOT finds that on - street parking is causing a problem with the functionality of the streets, we very likely will post these streets as "No Parking" The Subdivision Street Standards is intended to be adequate design for the residential needs of the area but I am concerned that this proposal will introduce functional problems to the streets. I would recommend that there be adequate off-street parking proposed with this SP. Thanks 3oel Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer 434-293-0011 Ext. 120 ioel.denunzio(@vdot.virginia.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Amelia McCulley [mailto:AM000LLE@albemarle.org] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 10:47 AM To: DeNunzio, Joel D., P.E. Cc: Amy Pflaum; Summer Frederick Subject: SOCA Belvedere - on -street parking question Joel, I have a question about whether VDOT will accept on -street parking as shown on the attached pdf. These roads are approved with two -14 foot wide travel lanes. We are meeting with them on Monday afternoon. If it's possible to have some info from VDOT in time for this mtg, that would be fantastic. 1 89 92 Parking Tabulation TINGLE FAMILY HOMES TYPE NUMBER PARKING '' ON SITS ONSTREET 2 PARKING SPACES/LOT e1 _ REQUIRED PARKING PARKING 'ROVIDED ON-SITE) B7 e0 ITMHOMES T8 18 1 8 10 (SEE NOTE 1) SINGLE+- FAMILY HOMES 110 220 (210T) 220 _0 SOCA FIELD HOUSE SEE NOTE 3 90 0 92 (SEE NOTE 2) �F BELVEDERE BLVD. -- ) d COLVIN ALLEY (u) ,I 8 — — 7 SOCA FELIWOUN ar s 8 TOANHOMES 4 LOTS i �3 it ti 1i /! N it 2 I ' i McKEEG4RSON 1. ON -STREET TOWN HOMES PARKING ARE INDICATED AS T# ON THE PLAN. 2. SPACES # 1 THROUGH 44 WILL BE SHARED BETWEEN CIVIC CORE USE, SOCAAND FUTURE MONTESSORI SITE 3. PARKING COUNT BY ZONING FOR FRONT OF HOUSE 6330 S.F. TOTALSOCA OFFICESAND RELATED SPACES 0 80% @ 11200 = 25 SPACES 3572 S.F. BASEMENT FITNESS 0 1/125 = 26 SPACES 634 BASEMENT STORAGE =0 1258 BELVEDERE CAFE @ 1311 000 = 16 THE CAFE AND FITNESS USES ARE CONCURRENT TOTHEFIELDHOUSE THETOTALSPACES REQUIRED IS, THEREFORE. 48 + 16 126 = 90 NON -CONCURRENT OFFICE USE REQUIRES 25 �+ _ FIELDHOUSE PARKING: 2 FIELDS C 24 SPACES 0 PER FIELD PER ZONING ORDINANCE = 48 O S SPACES = 0 OUR PREVIOUS COUNT FOR FULL SIZED FIELDS �+ WAS 24/FIELD z 2 FOR OVERLAP x 75% u. " RIDESHARE = 36 PER FIELDS FOR 16 PERSON = TEAMS. U E _ THESE FIELDS ARE FOR 10 PERSON TEAMS. FACTOR THE 36/FIELD DOWN TO OUR TEAM < z SIZE AND YOU GET 231FIELD. THIS BACKS w UP OUR USE OF 24/FIELD AND A GOOD WORKING NUMBER CONSISTENT WITH PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS. Legend SOCA FIELDHOUSE - SOCA PARKING SOCA SHARED PARKING TOWN HOMES TOWN HOMES ON -STREET PARKING COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville; Virginia 22902-4596 Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126 Steve VonStorch Stoneking VonStorch 1075 th Street S. E. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Brajesh Tiwari McKee Carson 301 East High Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 Belvedere Land Trust Robert Hauser 2421 Ivy Road Charlottesville, VA 22903 Summer Frederick Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Re: SOCA Fieldhouse Parking Determination Dear Lady and Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is to provide a written record of my parking determination for the SOCA Fieldhouse use. It is my determination based on your information, that the regular operation of this use requires 60 parking spaces. This determination does not cover parking for tournaments. As we discussed in our meeting on April 5th, parking for certain activities such as tournaments, will need to be managed. I will explain this more fully in the proceeding. The site plan dated as last revised on 4/6/10 is consistent with our discussion and I am hereby approving the provision of parking as shown in terms of number and location of parking. As we discussed, we recommend that you provide a curb cut from the new parking lot into the vacant area that is intended for a future school. This will provide an area for convenient overflow parking. This parking determination is made in accordance with Section 4.12.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. This determination results in fewer parking spaces than the number that Page 2 SOCA Fieldhouse Parking Determination April 16, 2010 would be required per Section 4.12.16. This distinction is based on two reasons. 1. The proposed SOCA indoor facility is not the same use as outdoor soccer fields in terms of usage and parking generation. 2. SOCA is an organization with an extensive history in the team sport of soccer in this region. They have sufficient experience to both understand their parking needs and to make any necessary adjustments, so as to avoid or minimize parking conflicts. In this determination, I am relying completely on SOCA's experience and proposal for parking needs for this use. SOCA plans to utilize the fieldhouse more in the winter than other seasons when outdoor fields will be available. With few exceptions, the staff or coaches are family members of the players. Thus, these staff do not generate additional parking needs. Saturday will be the peak day in terms of parking generation. These peak days will generally involve two games at one time with some overlap at the beginning and end as teams finish up and other teams arrive. Based on the typical team size of 10, there would typically be no more than 40 players there at one time. With the overlap (teams arriving while the prior teams are playing), 80 players would be there. Based on SOCA's experience, they need parking based on 3/4 or 75% of the number of players; therefore 60 parking spaces will be needed. There is play on other days of the week; however, those are not the peak days. The concession area will serve those who are onsite for soccer and will not generate independent traffic. Therefore, as an accessory use to the soccer, it does not warrant additional parking. The weight room may be used at non -peak times or by players who are there for play. Therefore, the weight room will not be factored for parking. While earlier plans proposed parking on some of the internal Belvedere residential streets, that parking is no longer proposed as necessary to meet the parking requirements. Those streets were not designed and are not wide enough to accommodate regular full-time parking, such as for Saturday soccer. They were intended for "informal" or "intermittent" parking that may involve staggered vehicles, but that does not fill the streets with parking on both sides. In our meeting on April 5th, we discussed the practical issue that people coming for soccer may choose to parking on the residential streets if more convenient parking is not readily available. It will be important for SOCA to be in conversation with the Homeowners Association to prepare for and address any issues that may arise. We recommend that SOCA be proactive about this and solve any problems that may develop. SOCA acknowledged that in the event of parking conflicts, they can stagger the two games so they begin at different times. It was also acknowledged and is a critical point, that major events such as tournaments, will require significant planning and managing. This will likely involve the need for off-site parking and shuttle service to the fieldhouse. Page 3 SOCA Fieldhouse Parking Determination April 16, 2010 I hope this information is helpful and satisfactory. If you have any questions or comments you wish to discuss, please feel free to contact me. In order to make this an official and final determination, I am including the standard appeal language per the Virginia Code. If you are aggrieved by this determination, you have a right to appeal it within thirty (30) days of the date notice of this determination is given, in accordance with Section 15.2- 2311 of the Code of Virginia. If you do not file a timely appeal, this determination shall be final and unappealable. An appeal shall be taken only by filing with the Zoning Administrator and the Board of Zoning Appeals a notice of appeal which specifies the grounds for the appeal. An appeal application must be completed and filed along with the fee of $120. The date notice of this determination was given is the same as the date of this letter. Sincerely, c Amelia G McCulley, A I.C.P. Zoning Administrator Cc: SDP 208-2 SOCA Fieldhouse