The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200900075 Review Comments 2009-09-25a.nefte.nnf L01ASA ALBEMARLE NELSON FLUVANNA Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District 706 Forest St, Ste G Charlottesville, VA 22903 975 -0224 September 25, 2009 TO:Elizabeth Marotta Planning Department RE:Soils Report and Comments for: Pleasant Grove New Sanctuary 368 • X I / 6 v 37C3 a 4E ;14E=`368 5Dv 37C 4D 3 14C 3 C3 3 -56C • - \_______ G 4D 36B i 36C 36B 03 j 36G 3j 3 1 lei 4D 3bB 3j 368 14D 1 3 O 368 1 77 37D3 14£ 411111111111 37>j.36C 1 15D 3G3 37D3 J 37C3 4C 36B,water a 47D y:276 1 4D Stu 1-- 31C3 368 u 47l i;27c 36B ' `s -,36C 3 l 88 65C 88 o `/65B 6B 2D 36B 36C 366 7. 47C198 36C I4 7D', 65C 94C i 291 4,,/N Li 36C 36C` 2D 368 56g 36B 36C 1 46 1 65C AEG na 14B 14C 94B 39C 88 94C p w1:6B 7`eat 441111.- w :a4.34D 37C 88 g•27C e > D ra; 94C 94C 19B 2/ Lrtlir- B e4 26B At , :‘ ,, Q 94B 65B 27D 36 O B 94C 94B V4 7C3 14 ir 948 27B i Laurel 3 366 36C 40/,36B 9 3q0 G 88 a NP/1” of 34C 2C V r 28C3 / aro.Ri naiii••••/#7,3 No em i. .rde 4 a 65B 47er E "94C 7 , 4j,47D nil iide 34D 6B 65C 94B C, f+ ate,..... 37C3 Joins sheet 1 1) fOO sy SCALE 1:15 840WI° (-9- Feet 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 1000 Meters 800 600 400 200 0 I k I I ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA NO. 6 717—li USDA United States Natural Prepared by: Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Department of Resources Conservation District ill Agriculture Conservation 434 - 975 -0224 Service Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: Pleasant Grove Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 47C Louisburg sandy loan, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Louisburg is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, deep or very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is rapid. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is FF. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 65B Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Pacolet is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is sandy loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 65C Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Pacolet is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is sandy loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 88 Udorthents, loamy Description Category: Virginia FOTG No description available for Udorthents, loamy. Map Unit: 94B Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Wedowee is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is V. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 94C Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 9/25/09 Wedowee is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is V. This soil is not hydric. Small Commercial Buildings - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 47C Louisburg sandy loam, 7 Very limited to 15 percent slopes 65B Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 65C Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to Very limited 15 percent slopes 88 Udorthents, loamy Not Rated 94B Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to Somewhat limited 7 percent slopes 94C Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to Very limited 15 percent slopes Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 47C Louisburg sandy loam, 7 Very limited to 15 percent slopes 65B Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 65C Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to Somewhat limited 15 percent slopes 88 Udorthents, loamy Not Rated 94B Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to Somewhat limited 7 percent slopes 94C Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to Somewhat limited 15 percent slopes Thomas Jefferson SWCD 2 9/25/09 Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 47C Louisburg sandy loam, 7 Not hydric to 15 percent slopes 65B Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent slopes 65C Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to Not hydric 15 percent slopes 88 Udorthents, loamy Partially hydric 94B Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to Not hydric 7 percent slopes 94C Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to Not hydric 15 percent slopes Soil Shrink - Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 47C Louisburg sandy loam, 7 1.5 to 15 percent slopes 65B Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 65C Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to 1.5 15 percent slopes 88 Udorthents, loamy 0 94B Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 1.5 7 percent slopes 94C Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to 1.5 15 percent slopes Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 47C Louisburg sandy loam, 7 Moderate Thomas Jefferson SWCD 3 9/25/09 to 15 percent slopes 65B Pacolet sandy loam, 2 to 7 High percent slopes 65C Pacolet sandy loam, 7 to High 15 percent slopes 94B Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to High 7 percent slopes 94C Wedowee sandy loam, 7 to High 15 percent slopes Thomas Jefferson SWCD 4 9/25/09 Fite uuN 7. 4"Cf AL e<<GLtel , v C v t IRGINZ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 October 6, 2009 AC Shelton PO Box 92406 Atlanta, GA 30314 RE: SDP- 2009 -75 Pleasant Grove Baptist Church- Final Dear Sir: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) - PeVA -4 hcit d 01,e) Albemarle County Division of Inspections Albemarle County Division of Planning (E911)- no objection Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board)- Pending Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue- no objection Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA)- no objection Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)- Pending ix'mti e fyiee 1ttJ Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by October 19, 2009. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Elizabeth M. Marotta Senior Plar er Zoning & Current Development forAL . Imo' County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:AC Shelton From:Elizabpth M. Marotta, Senior Planner Division' o g & Current Development Date: October 6, 2009 Subject: ' SDP 2009 -75 Pleasant Grove Baptist Church- Final Prior to a Preliminary The Planner /Engineer for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the preliminary plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] V This proposal has been submitted as a final prior to a preliminary. The ordinance contemplates the approval of a preliminary site plan prior to the submittal of a final site plan. However, by interpretation the ordinance does allow the submittal of a final prior to approval of a preliminary. No mechanism exists in the ordinance for the County to approve with conditions a final site plan. Therefore, if the site plan does not have all necessary approvals to allow signature by the revision deadline the County will deny your application. You may request that this project be changed from a final to a preliminary site plan which may allow the County to approve the plan with conditions or you may request that the County defer taking a formal action on your application. 2. 32.5.6.a] Provide correct Tax map and parcel number as well as instrument. 3. 32.5.6.a] Provide graphic scale 4. 32.5.6.a] Provide datum reference for elevation 5. 32.5.6.a] Zoning: This property is also in the Airport Impact Area and subject to ZMA200600010 and all conditions of SP200600024. Please add this information to the cover sheet and provide a list of all conditions on the plans. 6. 32.5.6.a] Provide source of topography 7. 32.5.6.a] Provide source of the survey 8. 32.5.6.a] Provide use of adjacent properties 9. 32.5.6.a] Provide all departing lot lines. Currently none are shown along Earlysville road. 10. [32.5.6.a] Show all minimum setback lines, yard, and building separation requirements. Currently callouts are provided, but lines are not shown. Refer to SP2006 -24 for setback requirements and list these on the plans. Be sure to include legend for any abbreviations used, ie. SBL, etc... 11. [32.5.6.a] Vicinity map is incorrect. Revise vicinity sketch so roads are clearly labeled and landmarks are accurately depicted. 12. [32.5.6.b] Provide maximum height of all structures 13. [32.5.6.b] Provide maximum impervious area data 14. [32.5.6.b] [32.6.6.g] Provide method for determining maximum required parking. 15. [32.5.6.d] Provide topography at least fifty (50) feet outside of the site. 1 16. [32.5.6.d] Indicate if there are critical slopes on the property. 17. [32.5.6.f] This property is in a water supply protection area (South Fork Rivanna- above reservoir). Provide note as required by this section. 18. [32.5.6.f] This property is not within an agricultural forestral district. Provide note as required by this section. 19. [32.5.6.i] [32.6.6.e] What is "20 ' callout dimensioning in the Earlysville Road right of way? Provide /label limits of pavement and limits of right of way. Clearly show how project will tie into existing road. 20. [32.5.6.j] Per Albemarle County Service Authority comments, provide information on the plan as to water and sewer. If this site is not within the ACSA jurisdiction, please indicate with a note and indicate how the site will be served. 21. [32.5.6.k] [32.6.6.j] Proposed drainfield may not be located under building or inside treeline. Revise and provide required information pursuant to these sections. 22. [32.5.6.1] Indicate all proposed utilities and easements. 23. [32.5.6.n] Dimension building (maximum footprint and height) 24. [32.5.6.n] [32.6.6.h.6] Show and dimension all walkways /sidewalks. See Inspections comments for more. 25. [32.5.6.n] Show locations of all proposed outdoor lighting and provide a lighting plan in conformance with Sec. 32.6.6.j. 26. [32.5.6.n] Provide paving material types and details for all walks, parking lots, and travelways. 27. [32.5.6.n] Indicate Location of trash containers. 28. [32.5.6.p] Show all proposed landscaping and provide a landscaping plan in conformance with Sec. 32.7.9. 29. [32.6.6.f] Provide signature panel for Department of Current Development 30. [Comment] Sheet 2: Albemarle County does not have a Department of Public Works. Please revise standard E &S notes. 31. [Comments] Sheet 3: a. What is the "18" curb opening" callout referring to? b. What is the thick black line connecting the eastern edge of the parking lot to the northern corner of the building? c. Delineate limits of clearing. [32.5.6.p] Because it appears trees are to remain on the site, a Conservation Checklist is required to be completed and signed and provided on the landscape plan.The checklist is available online at: http: / /www. albemarle .org /upload/images /forms_center /departments /community develop ment /forms/ applications /Checklist_Conservation_Pl an.pdf d. It appears that the proposed contour 605 in the southern portion of the site does not tie -in at all. e. Provide details, spot elevations, and better labeling for the "5' retaining wall ". f. Storm sewer description is not required on all sheets. g. Sec. 4.12.16] All travelways must be a minimum of 24' wide. 32. Engineering, Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), Inspections Division, Planning E911, Fire and Rescue, Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA), Health Department, and Architectural Review Board (ARB) approvals are required prior to final site plan approval. 33. Please submit a completed Final Site Plan checklist with your resubmittal. Checklist can be found at: http : / /www.albemarle.org /deptfonns asp ?section id= &depart ment =cda ps Please contact Elizabeth M. Marotta at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for further information. Application #:SDP200900075 Short Review Comn;11ts Project Name: Pleasant Grove New Sanctuary - Final Final — Non - residential — Commission Date Completed:09/28/2009 Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911 Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: NO OBJECTION. Date Completed:10/05/2009 Reviewer:James Barber Fire Rescue Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Must comply with the Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Final approval is subject to field inspection and verification. Date Completed:10/02/2009 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Based on plans dated August 10, 2009. Provide curb cuts at the heads of the barrier -free parking spaces' access aisles. Clearly indicate the accessible route from the barrier -free parking spaces to a building entrance. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 rLEteA-I kgpC ALgF 10 County tRGIN ,/ County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Elizabeth Marotta, Senior Planner From: John P. Diez, Engineering Review Division: Current Development Date:October 6, 2009 Subject: SDP200900075 Pleasant Grove New Sanctuary - Final Site Plan The final site plan for Pleasant Grove New Sanctuary, submitted on September 15, 2009, has been reviewed. Current Development Engineering has the following comments: General Final Site Plan Comments 1. Proposed contour lines must tie into existing contours. [18- 32.6.6] 2. Please provide date and source of the topographic information. All topography should be at least field verified by the designer within the last year. [18- 32.6.6] 3. Benchmark location, elevation, and datum for topography must be provided. An existing utility or other known position will suffice. [18- 32.5.6a] 4. Please provide all existing easements (access, drainage, sight, sanitary easements, etc.) with deed book references, locations, and dimensions. [18- 32.6.6] 5. All proposed slopes must be 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) or flatter. [Policy] 6. The plans mention a private sewer and a private well, but are not shown on the plans. Please show any existing and proposed utilities on the plans. [ 18- 32.5.61] 7. All entrances must have VDOT designations (PE -1, CG -9a, etc.) 8. Please show sight distance triangles at entrances. [ 18- 32.5.6] 9. Please note whether the culvert on SR 743 is existing or proposed. If it is a proposed culvert, then please include it within the limits of disturbance. 10. VDOT approval must be obtained for any plan affecting public right -of -way. 11. Curbing on all parking areas and travelways must have VDOT designations (CG -2, CG -6) 12. Please label all edges of pavement (where there is no curbing). 13. Parking areas cannot exceed 5% grade anywhere, in any direction. [ 18- 4.15c] 14. Proposed parking width x depth x aisle width must be 9' x 18'x24' or 10' x 18'x20' (where a 2' grass overhang is possible, parking spaces can be 16' deep). [18- 4.12.16] 15. Please indicate what material will be use for the parking area (gravel, asphalt, etc). [18- 32.5.6n] 16. Sidewalk detail or specifications must be provided. Sidewalk to be minimum 4" stone base and 4" concrete of 3000psi at 28 days, or stronger. [18- 32.7.2.8] 17. Please provide a typical retaining wall detail. A typical manufacturer's drawing for segmental block walls, or VDOT reference, is acceptable, with any applicable safety railings or guardrail shown. 18. Please provide Albemarle County General Construction Notes. Please refer to the Design Standards Manual. 19. Please provide drainage profiles and computations for the proposed storm sewer pipes. 20. Please provide curb inlet computations. 21. Please provide lines to all setbacks. Water Protection Plan Comments 22. Final Site Plan cannot be approved until Water Protection Ordinance application and fee together with Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control plans have been submitted, reviewed, and approved. 23. The plans can possibly be exempt for detention per Section 17 -314. However, detention might be required to address MS -19. 0 COMMONWEALTH of VIRQINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 DAVID S. EKERN, P.E. COMMISSIONER October 8 2009 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments October 8 2009 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the October 8 2009 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP - 2008 -00119 Treesdale Park - Preliminary (Summer Frederick) 1. The bus turn out may cause weave issues and sight distance problems on Rio Road. These issues were discussed during the rezoning of this project and it was decided that this turn out would be removed from the plan and shown as an easement for a possible future turnout to be considered if appropriate after Meadowcreek Parkway is constructed. 2. The minimum lateral setback for clear zone is 8 feet beyond the face of curb or 1 foot behind the sidewalk, whichever is greater in accordance with VDOT's Road Design Manual Section A -2. This is the location where the right of way needs to be shown. 3. Sight lines need to be within sight easements. 4. The width of the entrance may not accommodate the design vehicle with the proposed radius on the curve. A single unit truck should be able to make this turn. 5. The improvements shown to Rio Road do not appear to match the plan that was submitted for the Stonewater subdivision and have improper transitions shown. SDP - 2009 -00075 Pleasant Grove New Santuary -final (Elizabeth Marotta) 1. The location map shows the wrong location for this site. WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING 2. The proposed site entrance needs to show sight lines in accordance with The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways. 3. The entrance needs to show an entrance profile. 4. Show the drainage area to the culvert and the design data to show headwater elevation to pass the 10 year storm with adequate headwater in accordance with chapter 8 of VDOT's Drainage Manual. 5. Indicate proposed materials for the entrance. 6. The geometry of the entrance needs to be in accordance with The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways and the dimensions need to be shown on the plan. 7. SDP - 2009 -00065 Old Trail Village Phase 9 Prelim. (Megan Yaniglos) 1. Claremont Lane has a 20 mph design speed and the corresponding site distance is 225'. The connections to Claremont do not have adequate site distances shown. Sight distance triangles need to be contained within easements. The sight lines shown appear to cross structures or be very close to structures. 2. In accordance with VDOT's Road Design Manual, Appendix B, page B -15, intersections entering from the same side of the major street should have a spacing of 500 feet but with lower traffic volumes can be spaced at 250 feet. 3. Show sight lines and distances for the roundabout to ensure that the proposed building does not block the sight distances. 4. The final plans need to show entrance profiles for all proposed entrances to the streets. SDP - 2009 -00078 CTS Operation Center -Major (Summer Frederick) 1. This plan amendment does not appear to change the improvements to Avon Street or the proposed site entrances. SUB - 2009 -00129 Next Generation LLC — Final (Summer Frederick) 2. Will the new lot be developed and have an additional entrance on Boulders Road? Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434 - 293 -0011 WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Application #:SDP200900075 Short Review Commw,ts Project Name: Pleasant Grove New Sanctuary - Preliminary Preliminary - Non - residential Date Completed:09/28/2009 Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911 Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: NO OBJECTION. Date Completed:10/05/2009 Reviewer:James Barber Fire Rescue Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Must comply with the Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Final approval is subject to field inspection and verification. Date Completed:10/22/2009 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Based on plans revised October 12, 2009. Provide curb cuts at the heads of the barrier -free parking spaces' access aisles. Clearly indicate the accessible route from the barrier -free parking spaces to a building entrance. Date Completed:10/02/2009 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Based on plans dated August 10, 2009. Provide curb cuts at the heads of the barrier -free parking spaces' access aisles. Clearly indicate the accessible route from the barrier -free parking spaces to a buildinig entrance. Date Completed:10/22/2009 Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: This site does not fall within an Entrance Corridor. Date Completed:10/22/2009 Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: This site does not fall within an Entrance Corridor. Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Thursday, November 05, 2009 John Paul Diez From:John Paul Diez Sent:Monday, October 19, 2009 11:30 AM To:downingsurveys @aol.com' Cc:ac00 @comcast. net' Subject:Pleasant Grove New Sanctuary - SDP200900075 Attachments:Eng _Checklist_pre_site_plan.pdf; Design Manual - Checklist (full).pdf Mel Spain, I've spoken with AC Shelton in reference to the above application. He asked me to contact and inform you about the requirements for the WPO application. 1) An Erosion and Sediment Control plan must be submitted with the WPO application. Attached, you will find the checklist that the County uses to meet the requirements for Final Site Plan/WPO approval. 2) Under Section 17 -314 of the Albemarle County Ordinance, a Stormwater Management plan must be submitted. Since the applciation submitted will be a prelimianry site plan, only a conceptual stormwater management plan must be submitted. It must show how stormwater detention will be achieved. I would advise that the WPO be submitted after the Preliminary Site Plan has been approved since many changes occur during the preliminary process. You can find any information regarding these issues on the County website at http: / /www.albemarle.org /. Feel free to contact me should youhave any questions. Thank you, gi b"° DieZ Engineering Technician Dept. of Community Development 434) 296 -5832 Ext. 3025 1 of AL,*,III II kGtN PF County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Elizabeth Marotta, Senior Planner From:John P. Diez, Engineering Review Division: Current Development Date:November 6, 2009 Subject: SDP200900075 Pleasant Grove New Sanctuary - Preliminary Site Plan The preliminary site plan for Pleasant Grove New Sanctuary, submitted on October 16, 2009, has been reviewed. Current Development Engineering has the following comments: Preliminary Site Plan Comments 1. Benchmark location, elevation, and datum for topography must be provided. An existing utility or other known position will suffice. [1 8-32.5.6a] 2. Please provide a proposed conceptual lay -out for a storm drain facility including a storm detention pond or structure, indicating direction of flow in all pipes and watercourses with arrows. 18- 32.5.6k, 17 -303] 3. Removal rates must be met for each project drainage area. Please provide a Simple Method Spreadsheet. [17 -315A] 4. Please provide a sight distance triangles at the entrance. [18- 4.12.17b] 5. All proposed slopes must be 2:1 or flatter. [DSM] C1111 AL IIGI 1 -7,1 ir s County of Albemarle G lr,t, Department of Community Development Memorandum To:AC Shelton Elizabethh M. Marotta, Senior Planner t' Division: Zoning & Current Development Date:November 9, 2009 Subject: SDP 2009 -75 Pleasant Grove Baptist Church- Preliminary The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will approve the preliminary plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. 32.5.6.a] Provide correct Tax Map and Parcel number, as well as instrument. Currently, the plans state the subject parcel is TMP31 -27A. County GIS indicates the parcel is TMP31 -27A1. Please address this discrepancy. 2. 32.5.6.a] Zoning: a. AIA- This property is in the Airport Impact Area. While AIA was handwritten and added to the plans, please be sure this information gets included on all future submittals. b. This property is subject to ZMA200600010 and all conditions of SP200600024. This information must be added to the cover sheet and a list of all conditions must be provided on the plans. c. 50' No- Distrurbance Zone" means there shall be NO DISTURBANCE of land within that buffer. Revise plans so that no disturbance /clearing is proposed within this required buffer. 3. 32.5.6.a] Setback lines: a. Revise northern 25' setback line to end where it meets the rear 35' setback lines. b. Include legend for any abbreviations used, ie. SBL, etc... c. 75' SBL" callout is provided twice on one general location; revise so that one callout clearly labels the correct line. 4. 32.5.6.a] Vicinity map is deceiving, as the property immediately behind this site is not the airport; it is a residential neighborhood. Also, the road behind this parcel has been abandoned. Revise vicinity sketch so that all roads are clearly labeled and landmarks are accurately depicted. 5. 32.5.6.b] [32.5.6.e] [32.5.6.p] Landscaping: a. Revise landscape calculations, as 5% of 19,600 is 980, not 960. b. Provide legend or callouts indicating what dashed square areas are surrounding landscaping. c. Per Section 32.7.9.4.c, show existing landscape features (and treeline) and provide canopy calculations. 6. 32.5.6.b] [32.6.6.g] Provide method for deteimiining maximum required parking. 7. 32.5.6.d] Indicate if there are critical slopes (slopes in excess of 25 %) on the property. This is usually done by shading areas where slopes are in excess of 25% and providing a legend or 1 callout. 8. 32.5.61] This property is in a water supply protection area; explicitly provide which reservoir watershed applies (South Fork Rivanna- above reservoir). 9. 32.5.6.i] [32.6.6.e] What is "20 ' callout dimensioning in the Earlysville Road right of way? Pavement width? Provide /label limits of pavement and limits of right of way. 10. [32.5.6.k] [32.6.6.j] Water/ Sewer: a. Proposed drainfield may not be located within required undisturbed buffer. b. Drainfield location must be approved by Health Department. Please submit soils work to this office. c. Well location is not noted on plans, and staff was unable to see it on printed .pdf that was emailed to this office. Provide proposed well location on the plans. 11. [32.5.6.n] [32.6.6.h.6] Clearly show and dimension the limits of all walkways /sidewalks. See Inspections comments for more. ll. [32.5.6.n] Show locations of all proposed outdoor lighting and provide a lighting plan in conformance with Sec. 32.6.6.j. Provide required note on the cover sheet: "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one -half footcandle." 13. [32.5.6.n] Note on cover sheet says 50 parking spaces are provided, yet plans show 51. Please address discrepancy. 14. [32.5.6.r] Dimension on the plans the travelways, parking spaces (northeastern most space appears larger than the others), walkways, and building footprint. Building footprint was dimensioned by hand on this set; please make sure the dimensions get added to all subsequent submittals. 15. [Comments] Sheet 3: a. What is the "18" curb opening" callout referring to? Provide note or details to clarify. b. Clearly call out limits of clearing. [32.5.6.p] Because it appears trees are to remain on the site, a Conservation Checklist is required to be completed and signed and provided on the landscape plan.The checklist is available online at: http: / /www.albemarle.org /upload /images /forms_ centeridepartments /community develop went/ forms / applications /Checklist_Conservation_Plan.pdf c. Provide details /information and spot elevations for the "5" retaining wall ". d. Sec. 4.12.16] All travelways must be a minimum of 24' wide. 16. Engineering, Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), Inspections Division, and Health Department approvals are required prior to final site plan approval. 17. Submit a completed Preliminary Site Plan checklist with your resubmittal. Checklist can be found at: http: // www.albemarle.org /deptforms.asp ?section id= &department = cdapps Please contact Elizabeth M. Marotta at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for further information. John Paul Diez From:John Paul Diez Sent:Tuesday, November 24, 2009 10:03 AM To:downingsurveys @aol.com' Subject:Pleasant Grove - SDP200900075 Melvin, Below are the following options available to you regarding stormwater detention: 1.) You may be able to achieve your detention requirements with 2 or 3 smaller pipes in parallel instead of one large 48 -inch pipe. This could allow some flexibility with your pipe invert and cover elevations. 2.) The Health Department has previously approved asphalt parking over drainfields. This may allow you to redesign your parking area, leaving room elsewhere for an above - ground detention facility. 3.) Under Section 17 -314G of the Albemarle County Water Protection Ordinance, you may seek exemption of the requirement to control peak run -off. If you feel your development meets the criteria outlined in Section 314G, a written request for exemption must be submitted to the Program Authority (County Engineer Glenn Brooks), detailing why the site should be considered for exemption. Include supporting calculations and detailed analysis of the receiving channel. Exemptions of this requirement are rarely granted, except in extreme circumstances. If you would like to go over potential designs of any of the above options, you may present them to staff during our development meeting times (Thursdays from 2:30 -4pm). Please contact me to schedule. Thank you, John Diez Engineering Technician Dept. of Community Development 434) 296 -5832 Ext. 3025 1 LlRGiN Wt County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Elizabeth Marotta, Senior Planner From:John P. Diez, Engineering Review Division: Current Development Date:November 6, 2009 Rev.1) December 10, 2009 Subject: SDP200900075 Pleasant Grove New Sanctuary - Preliminary Site Plan The preliminary site plan for Pleasant Grove New Sanctuary, submitted on December 4, 2009, has been reviewed. Current Development Engineering has the following comments: Preliminary Site Plan Comments 4. Please provide a sight distance triangles at the entrance. [18- 4.12.17b] Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. 6. Due to a recent site visit, it appears that no existing utilities are shown on the plans. Please show the location of all existing and proposed utilities. [18- 32.5.6] Elizabeth Marotta From:Elizabeth Marotta Sent:Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:24 PM To:AC00 @Comcast. net' Cc:John Paul Diez; Carla Harris; Bill Fritz Subject:Pleasant Grove Final Attachments:PGBC -site plan application.pdf AC Good news, I found your site plans, and I will proceed with reviewing them and distributing them to all commenting department today, even without your completed application and check. I DO need your application and fees soon though! If possible, please have them to my office by next Monday, 5pm. Our Intake office has gone ahead and stared a new application number (SDP2009 -100) and project folder for your Final site plan application, which normally they wouldn't do without an application and all fees, so please try to get them to me as soon as possible! I have attached the Application for Site Development Plans. Please fill it out and return it to me. I have gone ahead and checked the two applicable parts of the application and circled the fee amounts for you. Let me point out that the Tier III Groundwater Review is required. This involves you providing us with a Tier III groundwater assessment (pursuant to Albemarle County Code Chapter 17- Sections 400, 403, 405) and then submitting it to us for the review. I understand it might take you some time to get the report done and to us, but just go ahead and pay the fee now and that way there is no delay in us accepting the report once it is ready. In a separate email I will send you an example of a Tier III report that was done recently. Please let me know if you have any questions, Thank you, Elizabeth M. Marotta Senior Planner County of Albemarle Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434) 296 -5832 Ext. 3432 teat Pte` vas tni+i allj (b.9 oI 4_ was S edit'' lv,64 ,-K SDP