Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP200900062 Review Comments 2009-08-24Wi(, ?lz >`.cc%Iee( tv c ! 4 Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District706ForestSt, Ste G August 24 2009 e2-'12-1Charlottesville, VA 22903 J 975 -0224 TO:Elizaboth Marotta SID 1 c) Planning Department RE:Soils Report and Comments for: Free Bridge Office t 16 4 10 21C 34C Joins sheet 11 Ul 71C 718 71C Noir I .cS'S1 t ' r 4 d s z xrt: ' g 101 . s,,_E Si . A 56B 76 e \$t4 h r , r • 34Ck0' { €1 71 7th r y la T r _ t , s t' 1904 , ' i i ar ,.4. ib e - + s tl.d 2C'3 tx may. Q k r,58D iG 1 tS ., .. h . t . S , "s'.e Fu 1 a i> 'f: „,,a- . , C T . 1 r 1 rj ., 1D r d • y ,rj a `t';76 21D 72 .rj Air • T58C L . t w 4 y G7 1b „" s' 'e7:yl " f`er 2Sxr r:i 11 ' { i ,t tD 71 a 1B try n • 3,7"C7;''P , F 0 t `t, a **•17:''''1-"r.'',144' . 2„ .,{.7 t ' 4*,''..:' y 3 rt 1, ` y: '7. 2C 3 i fit y ', `` j po , , y v z? ,2 ` yp e , 6;y, e_ ! , -..t d 1 tidfs"a G' ,. T 4 y .t 71E lk,+- .:g r' `„ , t v i; w f li71Bcafiro sX st'ca misB 0 s!3 z '4 v4i72C3r5 a , 1 w s t - 1x : 4 , i = r 2D3 y . -- ,; it lr it F , ie. v , + i M a 1 c ,, 1 go 5 N J.71.:.-. rt t hl,I A2 4f # fir .. , \ 4.&r: ' ' "rk ,r4 !e " :tr i "-nsE " $ j - ; , r 7 2C 3 ri n r _t rtt + .E cA l t t v 5 t eF?e p404!Y 72C3 1 a}A t e has 1s '. rte F , , "'z V ...tic)t 'r •r J 1 C 'a`1` ` t at' , t7 ' 't '"`. ". fi t g 41grs"AI • sl • _r.' td . > °w 1t m y 3 1 raec `J t<r.p 71D .i,.^ s "3E'. t.• - r ' ; i lSw l r3 n r_ i yt 4 a . s - . }Axe3D1172D3otnef ny Cq'i Y!'ra. a?z. i.'Si' aft 1' .L.;h:+ Ito! r,, +,, -•:23 f b" so t t ai 4 J' ay . SI`, ;T Rr ,.o k+st"t7`" ' 7 ` S l n4263 tr ' v «F'; * t 1 i -1 '3'J` A 4 ea v O y" $ / [ / `ztt`, et { J L,'Y °d' S 42C3- k {Air,.. 72C3 ., "f' .;iE y I'R p_n - Tr q l,r+'- I 4 # r s t "z u` r > i Z a s,, 1, ,-, 5 i # ... _ '15i. r a z, r .? ku: r k,r'Y 1B:'A'+'F++ a c 1 t .k t >r s . n F'.'+ '+- t 2 L4.t r s is 1 c , 0. rw” x ! ' H `s } y a'' °1 # x.4 a ' 90B' 1::‘ ;. • k , u ¢G 7 r . i p 4 9 q i ;sS q 44 + , k t.'t r` 71C n 1 a irx Z Y r r te.` n s t Illl c ` 1 -. j( _fir,,,,4 i;'S " ,x` 79B 716 4 N a `" 's r r t 4 y - , 4 w .{ Of t S s R4; 0 -. ..ya K 4 ab; 4':.X -Y : 3: t\' ti. Sz Xy :1' y ,`,. t d v U 3 i t t r S ' i4se:;y4 , .. 4t 4 A r. t e Y a t a':r 5 t ., y S `.: lxC F i 12 -z er j f'+;4 1'6 '6^``syT k s ` 'jdu y"t ; III 77 t 3'' ats, 55 Q J sa X . 1 t `z Y h ai# 3+y+' sr l s t r j,r h 4a 4' • 3 1 .4 4 s 1.:40,.' 1'" ' . 4 a U.•r., i ... X }s a *£Y t , itw t ry r +11ti ' t Net- lt” i,401'-'''"..- C,H 1 Ai y q- Z f ` 1t rr X 3day t s: z 'Y ; s b4 s ^r 6[ e P t...p y < } . vS r« ` ,, , ,, .e k 1 6+ t zK a f kz j, d +.lv Ytt, G `r4 tc rc` 5 ° 7.ayt^ ',.*:....'"4"i:- l4, -a y i.°a e s Z v1 '+7 %-,..: a rr j"y l .r M t - r S ^..: 't ` . r .'` .,-; IsJt7 /q I s f tt' 'S i R. v %a"e1 iE T$ fit§ o-p i'. Bl1 .1.44,.-,.:..:;a/ ry6 td l { , .: 4 ' e ' 44,;%4%, d +$xu. T5 i. ',;.= v_"°'uy a .2r y rte „ ;.._ ; a .E`^ - 1:-„;., _.,s M1i' sf149.. A All p'1 ' i . ti.„ -. °a 4,,, .,..` 144-,..". 4 \3t •t 4 ti C p 9- ro t1A r } 3 R + t`0,FiS.. '42 1 y a dr 2 i 1 r 3 71B ' l r . ” '1 • F'am , R' 4t s. r:7 c ? 441 r v '^+'! ry . 417;i1.1.13'-`4'4,4flat aR y rn3 k. p ay , f. t i. y` Y rr'' + E,+v ,{ , y $r f R E T 237 't 1 vA 0.",`" ' r 1 ,+ CPS$ iLl{ S srT e . i ;t Life L y, R qn .l z sL T n a fir {. tom`. Y 4;1,11; y i j-s u c 1 , v s 46 ,f 4 a • ro e ` h$7 iaia T f A c 7 ..•. t R- 8 F 'p t e 3s s.F _1 he,r a ^,fit' ...„:„. t.:,..,. ' 1P z ,1a171Ea t 1 i '• a } 76 1 t 'r P 7F . r N.- i5 rat \i s E4f = 2ate'i ; ,«d" & r D n f fit a ` C c 1 r. a S fit .,, ly 4 47D s 71 Y R ,,8 a a p " 7 +y/s,u i f PBf1tOPs r`e}JC p 5 f7 1a g / s rt r t fli 4w--0- Y • +a 5r 1 vP . ty t 9,5,•, ' 9) ti-' i 1 r' a k R - i 1 ,x h 3 F eT.71E a mod , ` . G R x b. T .ay t e • 1 ) . .', a..,.. aa s4 : 4".' 23B 711k___, ft+ qtr a_ '' 3. .,L e , Mir : E , s4r,,. 71C USDA United States Natural Prepared by: Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Department of Resources Conservation District Agriculture Conservation 434 - 975 -0224 Service Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: Free Bridge Office Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 12C Catoctin silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Catoctin is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, moderately deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 12D Catoctin sit loans, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Catoctin is a moderately steep to steep, moderately deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Catoctin is a steep, moderately deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is silt loam about 5 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderately rapid. It has a low available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7e. The Virginia soil management group is JJ. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 23B Davidson clay loan, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Davidson is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 4 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Davidson is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 4 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 8/24/09 not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71CRabun clay loam, Ito 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a moderately steep to steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 6e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 6 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderately low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 7e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 72B3 Rabun clay, 2 to 7 percent slopes, severely eroded Description Category: Virginia FOTG Rabun is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay about 4 inches thick. The surface layer has a very low content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The and capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is N. This soil is not hydric. Thomas Jefferson SWCD 2 8/24/09 Small Commercial Buildings - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 12C Catoctin silt loam, 7 to 15 Very limited percent slopes 12D Catoctin silt loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 Very limited percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to Very limited 15 percent slopes 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Very limited percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Very limited percent slopes 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 Very limited percent slopes 72B3 Rabun clay, 2 to 7 percent Somewhat limited slopes, severely eroded Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 12C Catoctin silt loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 12D Catoctin silt loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 Not hydric percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent slopes 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to Not hydric 15 percent slopes 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent siopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Not hydric percent slopes Thomas Jefferson SWCD 3 8/24/09 7I E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 Not hydric percent slopes 72B3 Rabun clay, 2 to 7 percent Not hydric slopes, severely eroded Soil Shrink -Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth : 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 12C Catoctin silt loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 12D Catoctin silt loam, 15 to 25 1.5 percent slopes 12E Catoctin silt loam, 25 to 45 1.5 percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to 1.5 15 percent slopes 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 1.5 percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 1.5 percent slopes 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 1.5 percent slopes 72B3 Rabun clay, 2 to 7 percent 1.5 slopes, severely eroded Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 12C Catoctin silt loam, 7 to 15 Moderate percent slopes 12D Catoctin silt loam, 15 to 25 Moderate percent slopes 12E Catoctin silt loam, 2.5 to 45 Moderate Thomas Jefferson SWCD 4 8/24/09 percent slopes 23B Davidson clay loam, 2 to 7 Moderate percent slopes 23C Davidson clay loam, 7 to Moderate 15 percent slopes 71B Rabun clay loam, 2 to 7 Moderate percent slopes 71C Rabun clay loam, 7 to 15 Moderate percent slopes 71D Rabun clay loam, 15 to 25 Moderate percent slopes 71E Rabun clay loam, 25 to 45 Moderate percent slopes 72B3 Rabun clay, 2 to 7 percent Moderate slopes, severely eroded Thomas Jefferson SWCD 5 8/24/O9 VLAI 1 valAtAin 'T V V V at el11(,((VGe1 IZ/ I ! 08 I 44-E cory I,y1GINlo. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 December 1, 2008 2 too S c -& E' Todd Philipp Dominion Development Resources Inc. 172 South Pantops Drive Charlottesville, VA 22911 RE: SDP 200800171 Free Bridge Office Preliminary Site Plan Dear Sir: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Inspections) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue (E911) Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) The following comments are forthcoming and will be provided under a separate cover: Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by December 15, 2008. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please note that a modification of Sec. 18 -4.2.5 of the Zoning Ordinance, also known as a critical slopes waiver, is required for this project. In order to present this waiver request to the Planning Commission at their January 6, 2009 meeting, you must have a complete waiver request submitted to this office no later than December 15, 2008. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have any questions about this.1lr t Sincerely, v'iGLL\ Ar Elizabeth Marotta Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development pl AL,E RGINI County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Todd Philipp, Dominion Development Resources, Inc. Owner: Hurt Investment Company Applicant: Free Bridge Auto From: Elizabeth Marotta, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date:December 1, 2008 Subject: SDP - 200800171 The Planner/Engineer for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. 32.5.6a] COMMENTS: Zoning- While zoning information can be gleaned from the Parcel Map on sheet 1, please add zoning information as a line item to Site Data list. Departing lot lines- Property boundaries shown on the site plan must match property boundaries are they are recorded. SUB200800219, which is a boundary line adjustment and final plat that would create the subject parcel (as shown in the site plan), has been submitted and is in the process of being reviewed. The final plat must be approved and recorded prior to approval of the final site plan, or, the site plan must be revised as necessary to reflect the current boundary conditions. 2. 32.5.6b] COMMENT: It appears that 49 spaces are provided, whereas the Site Data list indicates 48 spaces are provided. Please address this discrepancy. 3. 32.5.6d] COMMENTS: Critical slopes- Please provide a legend for shading (critical slopes) and hatch demo) shown on Sheet C3- Existing Conditions and Demo Plan. It appears that the critical slopes shown were man -made with the construction of Olympia Drive (WPO 200600075) and associated stormwater management facilities. If, to the satisfaction of the County Engineer, it is proven that this is the case, a critical slopes waiver will not be required. Otherwise, a critical slopes waiver will be required. Also, please note that it is required that you show topography and features at least up to 50' outside the property lines. Offsite topography- Because off -site grading is proposed, please make sure to show at least 50' beyond the limits of all disturbance. 4. 32.5.6n] COMMENTS: Parking lots- 5 of the required parking spaces are being provided off -site. An offsite parking agreement is required to be submitted and approved prior to final site plan approval. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, please provide evidence the adjacent property owner is willing to provide /negotiate the required agreement. Inter - parcel connectivity- This site is subject to Sec. 32.7.2.5 and inter - parcel connectivity is required. The adjacent Kia major amendment plan (still under review, SDP200500135) provides a connection point to this property, as does the preliminary plan for Whitehouse (SDP200800020) Please revise the plan as necessary to provide inter - parcel connections. Signs- If signage will be provided on this site, please show the proposed location. 5. 32.5.6j] COMMENTS: Albemarle County approved an easement plat on 11/ 21/08 that shows the drainage easement on the subject parcel as remaining, and in fact provides a new easement segment. The proposed preliminary site plan shows this easement as `to be vacated' and relocated to the western property line. Please address this discrepancy, and update the preliminary site plan to show all existing easements. Final tentative approval from this department will be subject to the following conditions: [These conditions are those which have been identified at this time. Conditions may be added or eliminated based on additional review.] 1. 32.5.6n] COMMENT: 5 of the required parking spaces are being provided off -site. An offsite parking agreement is required to be submitted and approved prior to final site plan approval. Please contact Elizabeth Marotta, Senior Planner at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for further information. 2 J e , , s may® l: County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Elizabeth Marotta, Planner From:Amy Pflaum, Engineering Review Division: Current Development Date:November 10, 2008 Subject: SDP200800171, Free Bridge Office - Preliminary The preliminary site plan for Free Bridge Office, received on November 10, 2008, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development can recommend approval once the following items are adequately addressed: A. Preliminary Site Plan Comments: 1. Please provide for interparcel connectivity to the neighboring parcels as shown on the approved Whitehouse Commercial Preliminary Site Plan (SDP20080020) and the Kia Site Plan Major Amendment (SDP200500135). 2. Please designate which critical slopes (as shown on the Existing Conditions Plan) are man -made, and designate the approved plan which created them - Olympia Drive, Kia, or Free Bridge Auto application numbers and approval dates can be researched at the Community Development Office or on -line at Countyview Web). Designate which critical slopes, if any, are natural. The disturbance of critical slopes which were not created with an approved plan will require a waiver from the Planning Commission. 3. To provide safe circulation, it is recommended that the entrance to the lower parking lot be moved farther away from Olympia Drive. A minimum tangent of 50 -feet between the two entrances is suggested. 4. Based on the 2.5:1 slope and the greater than 10 -foot drop -off, it appears that guardrail is necessary in front of the 5 proposed parking spaces in the Free Bridge Auto lot. [DM] 5. The difference in grade created between the proposed travelway and the Whitehouse Commercial site could require a guardrail on the Whitehouse site. [DM] 6. The difference in grade created between the proposed parking lot and the existing Free Bridge Auto site could require a guardrail along the existing Auto parking . [DM] 7. The existing inlet on Olympia Drive that the 24" RCP is connecting into is not showing up on the plans, please add this inlet. B. Final Site Plan Comments: 8. A temporary grading and construction easement will be necessary from the Whitehouse Commercial parcel prior to approval of the Final Site Plan. Please provide a letter of intent to grant the easement from the owner of this parcel. 9. The boundary line adjustment and easement plats necessary to accommodate this development must be recorded prior to approval of a Final Site Plan. 10. The final site plan is subject to County Code Chapter 17 Water Protection Ordinance. Approval of a Water Protection Ordinance Application including Erosion and Sediment Control Plans per Article H will be required. To ensure that Stormwater Management and Water Quality was accounted for with the design of the Luxor Pond, please submit the allowable impervious area (or C- value) of the site, based on the Luxor Pond plans, and the actual proposed impervious area. Application #: ! SDP200800171 - Short Review C©mr nts Project Name:I Bridge Office - Prelim I Preliminary — Non - residential Date Completed:12/01/2008 Reviewer:Amy Pflaum Engineer Z &CD Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: SRC 12/4/08 Date Completed'11/25/2008 Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911 Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: NO OBJECTION. Date Completed: Reviewer:Eryn Brennan ARB Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments: 1The parcel is adjacent to the Entrance Corridor and is therefore subject to ARB review. in order to determine what portions of the site will be visible from the Entrance Corridor, the applicant should submit site sections through the three travel ways traversing the site from the Entrance Corridor to the rear (north) portion of the site, and one site section from the south corner of the site to the southeast corner of the .ro.osed building. Date Completed:11/18/2008 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: ( Based on plans dated November 10, 2008. INo comments or conditions. Page. 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Monday, December 01, 2008 Service Authrit TO: Elizabeth Marotta FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer DATE: November 24, 2008 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Free Bridge Office - Preliminary S DP200800171 TM 78 -11 The below checked items apply to this site. X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2. An 8 inch water line is located approximately 60'distant. 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at 20 psi residual. X 4. An 8 inch sewer line is located approximately 290'distant. 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7.and plans are currently under review. 8.and plans have been received and approved. X 9. No plans are required. 10. Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may /may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections. 13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. Comments: Backflow prevention is required. Provide a plumbing fixture count to size the meter. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations water line size waterline locations sewer line size sewer Tine locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698 www.serviceauthoriy.org r'e'v • Jf' . • COMMONWEALTH of VIRQINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 DAVID S. EKERN, P.E. COMMISSIONER December 2 2008 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments December 4 2008 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the December 4` 2008 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP - 2008 - 00169 Eckman Property (AT &T CV379) Prelim. (Megan Yaniglos) Show sight distances in accordance with the requirements of The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways at the existing entrances along Route 29 and Route 710. SDP - 2008 - 00170 American Legion Post 74 - Major (Summer Frederick) An entrance profile needs to be shown on the proposed entrance that meets the requirements of the CG -11 standard as shown in the VDOT Road and Bridge Standards. Show the sight distance on Route 22 in accordance with The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways. SDP - 2008 - 00171 Free Bridge Office Prelim. (Elizabeth Marotta) The minimum width requirements for commercial entrances as shown in 24VAC 30 -71 -160 are measured at the throat of the entrance, not the right of way line. The minimum width at the throat is 30 feet. The sight distance lines that fall outside of the right of way will require sight easements. According to the lateral setback requirements stated in VDOT's Road Design Manual, appendix A, page A -16, the minimum setback for the clear zone for WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING roads of 45 mph and less is to be 8 feet or the back of the sidewalk, whichever is greater. The proposed street trees are within this clear zone and need to be removed. A clear zone easement should be provided for the minimum setback according to these requirements. Street trees are only permitted with the 3 foot offset when the design speed of the road is 20 mph or less. I would recommend placing the trees behind the sidewalk and providing the clear zone easement. Show the trips generated from the site. The plan needs to include the drainage computations for the changes that will affect the 36 inch RCP under Olympia Drive and the rest of the system that is affected. Show the entrance profile at the connection to Olympia Dr. SDP - 2008 - 00279 Kenridge Section 3 Final No comments. SUB - 2008 - 00281 Old Trail Village Ctr (Blk 2, 1 - 9 Lots) Final (Megan Yaniglos) No Comments. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434 -293 -0011 WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING fIL t-DPA 46 ,4e U . tie Cal t) G L V F 1 y V -J 0 44` t ,..." County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Justin Shimp. Dominion Engineering Owner: Free Bridge Auto Apply' cant: Hurt Investment Company 0 <in:Elizabeth Marotta, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date:December 8, 2009 Subject: SDP 200900062 Free Bridge Office Preliminary Site Plan- Administrative Critical Slopes Waiver Request The Agent has approved your November 6, 2009 request for a waiver of Chapter 18 Section 4.2 of the Albemarle County Code to allow disturbance of slopes in excess of 25% in association with the above -noted site plan. Staff reviewed your request and found it to be in compliance with Section 4.2.5.b, as the proposed slopes to be disturbed were created by approved site plans SDP2000 -62 and WP02006 -75. 1 sF AL, County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Elizabeth Marotta, Planner From:John Diez, Engineering Review Division: Current Development Date:August 31, 2009 Subject: SDP200900062, Free Bridge Office - Preliminary The preliminary site plan for Free Bridge Office, received on August 11, 2009, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development can recommend approval once the following items are adequately addressed: A. Preliminary Site Plan Comments: 1. Please provide removal rates for the pre - development and post - development drainage areas. 2. Please provide for interparcel connectivity to the neighboring parcels as shown on the approved Whitehouse Commercial Preliminary Site Plan (SDP20080020) and the Kia Site Plan Major Amendment (SDP200500135). 3. Please designate which critical slopes (as shown on the Existing Conditions Plan) are man -made, and designate the approved plan which created them - Olympia Drive, Kia, or Free Bridge Auto application numbers and approval dates can be researched at the Community Development Office or on -line at Countyview Web). Designate which critical slopes, if any, are natural. The disturbance of critical slopes which were not created with an approved plan will require a waiver from the Planning Commission. 4. To provide safe circulation, it is recommended that the entrance to the lower parking lot be moved farther away from Olympia Drive. A minimum tangent of 50 -feet between the two entrances is suggested. 5. Based on the 2.5:1 slope and the greater than 10 -foot drop -off, it appears that guardrail is necessary in front of the 5 proposed parking spaces in the Free Bridge Auto lot. [DM] 6. The difference in grade created between the proposed travelway and the Whitehouse Commercial site could require a guardrail on the Whitehouse site. [DM] 7. The difference in grade created between the proposed parking lot and the existing Free Bridge Auto site could require a guardrail along the existing Auto parking . [DM] B. Final Site Plan Comments (For information purposes only): 8. Vehicle access aisles, that are not adjacent to parking spaces, shall not exceed a grade of 10 %. 18- 4.12.17a] 9. Dumpster pad cannot have drainage running beneath it. The site must be designed so that stomiwater does not run through, and drains away. 10. VDOT approval must be obtained for plans that affect right -of -way prior to fmal site plan approval. [DSM902B] 11. A temporary grading and construction easement will be necessary from the Whitehouse Commercial parcel prior to approval of the Final Site Plan. Please provide a letter of intent to grant the easement from the owner of this parcel. 12. The boundary line adjustment and easement plats necessary to accommodate this development must be recorded prior to approval of a Final Site Plan. 13. The fmal site plan is subject to County Code Chapter 17 Water Protection Ordinance. Approval of a Water Protection Ordinance Application including Erosion and Sediment Control Plans per Article II will be required. To ensure that Stormwater Management and Water Quality was accounted for with the design of the Luxor Pond, please submit the allowable impervious area (or C- value) of the site, based on the Luxor Pond plans, and the actual proposed impervious area. CoPy AV (JD1 oJ 1ijfl .. t, U NGINIP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 September 1, 2009 Justin Shimp Dominion Development Resources Inc. 172 South Pantops Drive Charlottesville, VA 22911 RE: SDP- 2009 -62 Free Bridge Office- Preliminary Site Plan Dear Sir: The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. As we discussed previously, this application is the same one that was submitted and then deferred in December 2008 (SDP2008 -171), minus the lighting plan. Because the comments from the December 2008 SRC meeting were not addressed, I have re- issued them and attached them here for your reference. In addition to those comments, any new or updated comments are also attached. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) UPDATED Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) UPDATED Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Inspections) Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board) UPDATED Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue (E911) Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District Soils Report (For your reference) Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) 11" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by September 14, 2009. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please note that a modification of Sec. 18 -4.2.5 of the Zoning Ordinance, also known as a critical slopes waiver, may be required for this project. In order to present this waiver request to the Planning Commission at their October 6, 2009 meeting, you must have a complete waiver request submitted to this office no later than September 14, 2009. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have any questions about this. Sincerely, Elizabeth Marott Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development Cc: Free Bridge Auto Hurt Investment Company DEAL cl® County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Justin Shimp, Dominion Development Resources, Inc. Owner: Hurt Investment Company Applicant: Free Bridge Auto l m:Elizabeth Marotta, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date:September 1, 2009 (Updated from December 1, 2008 comments for SDP08 -171) Subject: SDP - 2009 -62 The Planner for the Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] 1. 32.5.6b] COMMENT: It appears that 53 spaces are provided, whereas the Site Data list indicates 48 spaces are provided. Please address this discrepancy. 2. 32.5.6d] COMMENTS: Critical slopes- UPDATE: Provide evidence that critical slopes were created with an approved site plan, otherwise a critical slopes waiver will be required. Also, please provide callouts or legend to identify the shading on the existing conditions plan (that I believe to be critical slopes). Topography- It is required that you show topography and features at least up to 50' outside the property lines; please revise accordingly. Also, it is my understanding that some of) the topography shown on the existing conditions plan is not actually existing, but is per an approved site plan (particularly off -site topo). Please be very clear about what topo is existing, and what topo is per an approved site plan. Where applicable, identify which site plan the approved topo came from. Offsite topography- Because off -site grading is proposed, please show topography for at least 50' beyond the limits of all disturbance. 3. 32.5.6n] COMMENTS: Parking lots- UPDATE: Required parking spaces are being provided off -site (23 +/- spaces). An offsite parking agreement is required to be submitted and approved prior to final site plan approval. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, provide evidence the adjacent property owner is willing to provide /negotiate the required agreement(s). Inter - parcel connectivity- This site is subject to Sec. 32.7.2.5 and inter - parcel connectivity is required. The adjacent Kia major amendment plan (SDP200500135) provides a connection point to this property, as does the preliminary plan for Whitehouse (SDP200800020, Final SDP200800124) Please revise the plan as necessary to provide inter - parcel connections. Signs- UPDATE: Signage is not required to be shown on the site plan. 1 4. 32.5.6j] COMMENT: Albemarle County approved an easement plat on 11/ 21/08 that shows the drainage easement on the subject parcel as remaining, and in fact provides a new easement segment. The proposed preliminary site plan shows this easement as to be vacated' and relocated to the western property line. Please address this discrepancy, and update the preliminary site plan to show all existing easements. 5. 32.5.6.e] [32.7.9.4.c] COMMENT: Existing landscape features are required to be shown. If none exist, please provide note on plan to confirm there are none to show. Final tentative approval from this department will be subject to the following conditions: [These conditions are those which have been identified at this time. Conditions may be added or eliminated based on additional review.] 1. 32.5.6n] UPDATE: Offsite parking agreement is required to be submitted and approved prior to final site plan approval. 2. ARB approval is required prior to final site plan approval. 3. 32.7.9.6 Street Trees] Prior to final site plan approval, the requirements of this section must be met. Please contact Elizabeth Marotta, Senior Planner at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for further information. k,lre- Vy11L? ~ pq a r County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Justin Shimp, Dominion Development Resources, Inc. Owner: Hurt Investment Company Applicant: Free Bridge Auto From: Elizabeth Marotta, Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date:September 1, 2009 (Updated from December 1, 2008 comments for SDP08 - 171) Subject: SDP - 2009 -62 The Planner for the Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] y [32.5.6b] COMMENT: It appears that 53 spaces are provided, whereas the Site Data list indicates 48 spaces are provided. Please address this discrepancy. 32.5.6d] COMMENTS: Critical slopes UPDATE: Provide evidence that critical slopes were created with an a oved site plan, otherwise a critical slopes waiver will be required. Also, please provide callouts or legend to identify the shading on the existing conditions plan (that I believe to be critical slopes). Topography It is required that you show topography and features at least up to 50' outside the property lines; please revise accordingly. Also, it is my understanding that some of) the topography shown on the existing conditions plan is not actually tyexisting, but is per an approved site plan (particularly off -site topo). Please be very clear about what topo is existing, and what topo is per an approved site plan. Where applicable, identify which site plan the approved topo came from. Offsite topography Because off -site grading is proposed, please show topography i/ for at least 50' beyond the limits of all disturbance. 3. 32.5.6n] COMMENTS: Parking lots UPDATE: Required parking spaces are being provided off -site (23 +/- spaces). An offsite parking agreement is required to be submitted and approved prior to final site plan approval. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, provide evidence the adjacent property owner is willing to provide /negotiate the required agreement(s). Inter p • rcel connectivity This site is subject to Sec. 32.7.2.5 and inter - parcel co ni• y is required. The adjacent Kia major amendment plan (SDP200500135)tpr • I - s a connection point to this property, as does the preliminary plan for Whitehouse (SDP200800020, Final SDP200800124) Please revise the plan as necessary to provide inter - parcel connections. 0 igns UPDATE: Signage is not required to be shown on the site plan. CC l 32.5.6j] COMMENT: Albemarle County approved an easement plat on 11/ 21/08 that shows t d nage easement on the subject parcel as remaining, and in fact provides a new ea ent segment. The proposed preliminary site plan shows this easement as to be vaca e and relocated to the western property line. Please address this discrepancy, and update the preliminary site plan to show all existing easements. r \[32.5.6.e] [32.7.9.4.c] COMMENT: Existing landscape features are required to be ll,... shown. If none exist, please provide note on plan to confirm there are none to show. Final tentative approval from this department will be subject to the following conditions: [These conditions are those which have been identified at this time. Conditions may be added or eliminated based on additional review.] 1. 32.5.6n] UPDATE: Offsite parking agreement is required to be submitted and approved prior to final site plan approval. 2. ARB approval is required prior to final site plan approval. 3. 32.7.9.6 Street Trees] Prior to final site plan approval, the requirements of this section must be met. Please contact Elizabeth Marotta, Senior Planner at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext. 3432 for further information. 2 Application #:SDP200900062 Short Review Comor,nts Project Name: Free Bridge Office - Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary - Non - residential Date Completed:08/24/2009 Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911 Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: NO OBJECTION. Date Completed:08/26/2009 Reviewer:Elizabeth Marotta CommDev- Current Development Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Soils Report from TJSWCD no review necessary. See docs /pics for a copy. Date Completed:08/26/2009 Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: IThis property falls within the Route 250 Entrance Corridor. The applicant is encouraged to submit multiple site sections from the property (including the proposed building) through the Entrance Corridor to clarify the extent of visibility. Visible portions of the property will require ARB Ireview /approval. ARB applications, checklists, guidelines and schedules are available on line at www.albemarle.org. site plan dated 7/24/09) Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 817.1 A * {. 14191-1' vi Service Auth/rrity t t tf L- TO: Elizabeth Marotta FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer DATE: November 24, 2008 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: Free Bridge Office - Preliminary SDP200800171 TM 78 -11 The below checked items apply to this site. X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2. An 8 inch water line is located approximately 60'distant. 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at 20 psi residual. X 4. An 8 inch sewer line is located approximately 290'distant. 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7.and plans are currently under review. 8.and plans have been received and approved. X 9. No plans are required. 10. Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may /may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections. 13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. Comments: Backflow prevention is required. Provide a plumbing fixture count to size the meter. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations water line size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698 www.serviceauthoriy.org L{PI h 1 Lu)ctc. t-e-t j*[ C. V of cc) COMMONWEALTH of VIRC3INIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 DAVID S. EKERN, P.E. COMMISSIONER September l 2009 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments September 3 2009 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT' s comments on the Site Plans for the September 3 2009 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP - 2009 - 00062 Free Bridge Offices Prelim Site Plan (Elizabeth Marotta) A basin is being removed from this site in order to construct the new parking lot. If it is a temporary silt basin, there are no concerns, but if it a permanent stormwater management basin, there is cause for concern due to an increase in peak discharges going into the storm system under Olympia Drive. SDP - 2009 - 00065 Old Trail Village Block 3 (Phase B) Prelim. (Megan Yaniglos) Claremont Lane has a 20 mph design speed and the corresponding site distance is 225'. The connections to Claremont do not have adequate site distances shown. Sight distance triangles need to be contained within easements. The sight lines shown appear to cross structures or be very close to structures. In accordance with VDOT's Road Design Manual, Appendix B, page B -15, intersections entering from the same side of the major street should have a spacing of 500 feet but with lower traffic volumes can be spaced at 250 feet. The 14 foot private road easement does not meet the minimum criteria. The proposed grading of the private roads appears to drain water to the proposed public road. In accordance with 24 VAC 30 -71 -90 The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways, the water should not drain into the public road. There is a clear zone easement along Old Trail Dr. that needs to be shown on the plan. WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING SUB- 2009 -00108 Old Trail Village Block 2 Subdivision (Megan Yaniglos) The vacation of the right of way for the proposed public streets will remove these streets from qualifying for addition to the State Secondary Road System. In addition, this removal may result in other connecting streets not qualifying for state maintenance. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434 -293 -0011 WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING ty yy' ''f; f. COMMONWEALTH of VIRINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22 a DAVID S. EKERN, P.E.y COMMISSIONE e - 1G_ t « fDecember22008 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 401 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments December 4 2008 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the December 4 2008 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP - 2008 -00169 Eckman Property (AT &T CV379)- Prelim. (Megan Yaniglos) Show sight distances in accordance with the requirements of The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways at the existing entrances along Route 29 and Route 710. SDP - 2008 -00170 American Legion Post 74 -Major (Summer Frederick) An entrance profile needs to be shown on the proposed entrance that meets the requirements of the CG -11 standard as shown in the VDOT Road and Bridge Standards. Show the sight distance on Route 22 in accordance with The Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways. 4 SDP - 2008 -00171 Free Bridge Office- Prelim. (Elizabeth Marotta) The minimum width requirements for commercial entrances as shown in 24VAC 30 -71 -160 are measured at the throat of the entrance, not the right of way line. The minimum width at the throat is 30 feet. The sight distance lines that fall outside of the right of way will require sight easements. According to the lateral setback requirements stated in VDOT's Road Design Manual, appendix A, page A -16, the minimum setback for the clear zone for WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING roads of 45 mph and less is to be 8 feet or the back of the sidewalk, whichever is greater. The proposed street trees are within this clear zone and need to be removed. A clear zone easement should be provided for the minimum setback according to these requirements. Street trees are only permitted with the 3 foot offset when the design speed of the road is 20 mph or less. I would recommend placing the trees behind the sidewalk and providing the clear zone easement. Show the trips generated from the site. The plan needs to include the drainage computations for the changes that will affect the 36 inch RCP under Olympia Drive and the rest of the system that is affected. Show the entrance profile at the connection to Olympia Dr. SDP - 2008 - 00279 Kenridge Section 3 Final No comments. SUB - 2008 - 00281 Old Trail Village Ctr (Blk 2, 1 - 9 Lots) Final (Megan Yaniglos) No Comments. Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer VDOT Charlottesville Residency 434 -293 -0011 WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING E ev ,t tiv County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Elizabeth Marotta, Planner From: John Diez, Engineering Review Division: Current Development Date:September 29, 2009 Subject: SDP200900062, Free Bridge Office - Preliminary The preliminary site plan for Free Bridge Office, received on August 11, 2009, has been reviewed. The engineering review for current development can recommend approval once the following items are adequately addressed: A. Preliminary Site Plan Comments: 2. Please provide for interparcel connectivity to the neighboring parcels as shown on the approved Whitehouse Commercial Preliminary Site Plan (SDP20080020) and the Kia Site Plan Major Amendment (SDP200500135). Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. 3. Please designate which critical slopes (as shown on the Existing Conditions Plan) are man -made, and designate the approved plan which created them - Olympia Drive, Kia, or Free Bridge Auto application numbers and approval dates can be researched at the Community Development Office or on -line at Countyview Web). Designate which critical slopes, if any, are natural. The disturbance of critical slopes which were not created with an approved plan will require a waiver from the Planning Commission. Rev. 1) Comment has not been addressed. SP199900034 does not include the disturbance or creation of critical slopes. Please provide the correct application number. B. Final Site Plan Comments (For information purposes only): 8. Vehicle access aisles, that are not adjacent to parking spaces. shall not exceed a grade of 10 %. 18- 4.12.17a] 9. Dumpster pad cannot have drainage running beneath it. The site must be designed so that stormwater does not run through, and drains away. 10. VDOT approval must be obtained for plans that affect right -of -way prior to final site plan approval. [DSM902B] 11. A temporary grading and construction easement will be necessary from the Whitehouse Commercial parcel prior to approval of the Final Site Plan. Please provide a letter of intent to grant the easement from the owner of this parcel. 12. The boundary line adjustment and easement plats necessary to accommodate this development must be recorded prior to approval of a Final Site Plan. 13. The final site plan is subject to County Code Chapter 17 Water Protection Ordinance. Approval of a Water Protection Ordinance Application including Erosion and Sediment Control Plans per Article I1 will be required. To ensure that Stormwater Management and Water Quality was accounted for with the design of the Luxor Pond, please submit the allowable impervious area (or C- value) of the site, based on the Luxor Pond plans, and the actual proposed impervious area. Ao LLJAr" rll COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 DATE: 9/29/09 Contact Company Address City State Zip RE: SDP -09 -00062 — Free Bridge Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to Section 32.4.2.4 of Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code, the above referenced site plan has been denied. This action has been taken because the site plan has not been revised to include required revisions of the Site Review Committee. Those items that have not been addressed are: 1. 18- 32.5.6s, Design Standards 5 -A.la] COMMENT: Please provide removal rates for the pre- development and post - development drainage areas. Removal rates must be submitted in order to verify that the pond is adequate to serve this development. 2. 18- 4.2.5b] COMMENT: SP199900034 does not include the disturbance or creation of critical slopes. Please provide the correct application number. You may obtain reinstatement of review as provided by Section 32.4.2.4 of Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code. A reinstatement fee of $65 must be included with the resubmittal of the plan. If a revised plan and fee are not received within fifteen (15) calendar days the plan shall be deemed to be denied and a new application and fee shall be required for submittal of the plan. In accord with Section 32.4.2.7 of Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code, this decision may be appealed. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, John P. Diez Technical Engineer/ Current Development OFAlga Lk L /1 /C1 J ILA iltatVel f ylil'11 „ M ®IC tIkGINZP COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, North Wing Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 October 7, 2009 Justin Shimp Dominion Development Resources, Inc. 172 South Pantops Drive Charlottesville, VA 22911 RE: SDP - 2009 -62 Free Bridge Office Preliminary Site Plan Dear Sir: Pursuant to Section 32.4.2.4 of Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code, the above referenced site plan has been denied. This action has been taken because the site plan has not been revised to include required revisions of the Site Review Committee. Those items that have not been addressed are: 1. 32.5.6.n, s] COMMENT: In accord with Chapter 18, Section 32.7.2.5 inter - parcel connectivity is being required. The adjacent Ilia major amendment plan (SDP200500135) provides a connection point to this property, and connectivity is being required. 2. 32.4.2.6] COMMENT: A critical slopes waiver is required. You may obtain reinstatement of review as provided by Section 32.4.2.4 of Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code. A reinstatement fee of $65 must be included with the resubmittal of the plan. If a revised plan and fee are not received within fifteen (15) calendar days the plan shall be deemed to be denied and a new application and fee shall be required for submittal of the plan. In accord with Section 32.4.2.7 of Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code, this decision may be appealed. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have any questions or require additional infolination. Sincerely, Elizabeth M. Marotta, Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development File: SDP - 2009 -62 Cc: Free Bridge Auto Hurt Investment Company 1400 Richmond Road 195 Riverbend Drive Charlottesville, VA 22911 Charlottesville, VA 22911 1 Page 1 of 1 copy Elizabeth Marotta Oadid a From: Elizabeth Marotta V I Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 3:22 PM o / v To:Justin Shimp' Cc:John Paul Diez; Bill Fritz Subject: Free Bridge Critical slopes waiver request Justin, We have looked at your critical slopes waiver request. While the WPO and SDP00 -62 do approve /create some of the critical slopes that will be impacted by the proposed site plan, not all of the critical slopes that will be impacted were created pursuant to an approved site plan. We cannot accept that the slopes on the eastern portion of the site were created as a result of an approved site plan because SDP2008 -20 is a preliminary plan. Grading cannot take place with preliminary approval, thus, any slopes that exist in the field now could not have been as a result of that plan. Further, WPO and SDP00 -62 do not meet or overlap, as the limits you have drawn indicate. It appears that there is a gap between contour 447 (just south of "existing pipe to be removed ") and north of the outfall of "Existing outlet structure and pipe to be removed" where critical slopes were not approved to be created. In order to obtain waivers for all critical slopes that are proposed to be disturbed, you must request a waiver from the Planning Commission for any slopes not previously approved by an approved final site plan. Please revise your waiver request to be specific about the limits of what is being presented to the Planning Commission (and pursuant to Chapter 18- 4.2.5.a of the Albemarle County Code), and submit it to me as soon as possible. It may be cleaner and easier to submit two seperate requests: one for administrative review and another to go to the Planning Commission. In an effort to move this forward as quickly as possible, I am already working to get this item on the next available Planning Commission agenda. Once I get a meeting date confirmed I will send you a schedule and let you know of any pertinent deadlines. Depending on what meeting date we can get this on, any delay in submitting a revised request to me may result in your item being removed from the agenda and being placed on the next available agenda. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns, Elizabeth M. Marotta Senior Planner County of Albemarle Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434) 296 -5832 Ext. 3432 10/30/2009 Page 1 of 1 Elizabeth Marotta From: Elizabeth Marotta Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:18 PM To:Justin Shimp' Cc:Bill Fritz; John Paul Diez Subject: Free Bridge Office Justin, We have reviewed your justification (dated 10/2/09) for not providing an inter - parcel connection between Kia and Free Bridge. We concur with your justification and will not be requiring interparcel connectivity there. The site plan still requires critical slopes waivers. We have received both your request for an administrative waiver, and a waiver to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. As I stated in a previous email, the PC waiver is scheduled for December 8th. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Elizabeth M. Marotta Senior Planner County of Albemarle Community Development Department 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 434) 296 -5832 Ext. 3432 11/10/2009 a Fr dllti III `P o i J, Ioo- fkG1N COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 - 4126 To:Elizabeth Marrotta, Senior Planner From:Amy Pflaum, Current Development Engineering Review Subject:SDP200900062, Free Bridge Office, Critical Slope Waiver Request Date received:20 October 2009 Date of Comment: 16 November 2009 2009 The request for a waiver to develop on areas of critical slope for grading incorporated with proposed development on TMP 78 -11 was received on 20 October 2009. The existing critical slopes and proposed grading are shown on the Preliminary Site Plan dated 19 October 2009. The disturbance is for the construction of a 2 -story office building and adjacent parking. In accordance with the Section 18 -4.2.5 the agent may waive the prohibition of disturbing critical slopes on any parcel not within the Rural Areas (RA), Monticello Historic District (MHD) or Village Residential (VR) zoning districts if the critical slopes were created during the development of the property pursuant to a site plan approved by the county. The critical slope areas to be disturbed are manmade slopes created with the Town & Country and Olympia Drive Road construction (Site Plan, WP0200600075, approved 8/20/2007) and the Free Bridge Auto Sales construction (Major Amendment, SDP200000062, approvedl2 /14/2000). The agent may grant a waiver if it is found that: 1. The property is not identified in the open space plan as one having any protected resources and a field inspection has confirmed that there are no significant or critical, features on the property identified for protection in the open space plan: TMP78 -11 is not identified in the open space plan for protection. 2. There is no reasonable alternative that would eliminate or reduce the disturbance of critical slopes: Manmade critical slopes cover 25% of the parcel, development without disturbance would be limited. 3. The developer or subdivider submitted and obtained approval from the program authority of an erosion and sediment control plan, regardless of whether- the area disturbed is less than ten thousand 10.000) square feet: Approval of Erosion & Sediment Control Plan is required prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan for this development. 4. The developer or subdivider submitted and obtained approval from the county engineer of a plan that describes how the movement of soil and rock, stormwater runoff siltation of natural and man -made bodies of water, the loss of aesthetic resources identified in the open space element of the comprehensive plan and in the event of the failure of a treatment works and subsurface drainfreld, a greater travel distance of septic effluent, will be mitigated through design, construction techniques, 1 revegetation, stormwater manement and other best management prL ces: Please see Request for Waiver submitted October 12, 2009 by Dominion Engineering. Engineering analysis is as follows: Below. each of the concerns of Zoning Ordinance section 18 -4.2 is addressed: 1. rapid and /or large scale movement of soil and rock ": The areas of critical slope are the cut area for Olympia Drive and the embankment of a temporary erosion & sediment control basin. Large scale movement of soil and rock is not anticipated to occur as a result of this construction. 2. excessive stormwater run-off': Conceptual stormwater management for the development, as shown on the preliminary site plan will be refined prior to Current Development engineering approval of the final site plan. Olympia Drive currently has storm sewer features in place, directing stormwater to a regional (non- County owned) facility. Excessive stormwater run -off is not expected to occur. 3. siltation of natural and man -made bodies of water : The applicant will submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan with the Final Site Plan which will be reviewed for County and State compliance. Proposed E &S measures are anticipated to reduce sediment -laden runoff from leaving the site. Inspection and bonding by the County will monitor maintenance of the erosion control facilities during construction. Proper stabilization and maintenance will achieve long term stability. 4. loss of aesthetic resource": This is an area that has been previously disturbed. Existing mature vegetation is expected to be sparse. 5. septic effluent ": The existing subdivision is served by public sewer and there are no septic drainfields within the area of this disturbance. No portion of this site plan is located inside the 100 -year flood plain area according to FEMA Maps, dated 04 February 2005. Based on the above review, the applicant has satisfactorily addressed the technical criteria for the disturbance of critical slopes. fH Court of Albemarle Application (sheet 1 of 2) PARCEL / OWNER INFORMATION STREET ADDRESS TMP 07800 -00 -00 -01100 House #Street Name Apt /suits Owner(s) HURT INVESTMENT COMPANY City /State CHARLOTTESVILLE VA Zip 22911-Primary Zoning `Highway Commercial TMP is Inactive? No APPLICATION :INFORMATION Entered By: Eileen Wittwer on 08/07/2009 Application # ARB200600063 Application Type Site Development Plans ARB200800015 Project Name Free Bridge Office - Preliminary Site Plan 6,794 0TH2O0900078 Received Date 08/05/2009 Received Date Final SDP200700128 Submittal Date 08/10/2009 Submittal Date Final Total Fees 1,801.00 SDP200800020 SDP200800124 Closing File Date Revision Number Total Paid 1,801.00 5DP200800171 Site Plan Waiver?Spec. Use Permit Amend.? Preliminary Site Plan?SDP200900062 No Planned District Amend.? Preliminary Subdivision Plat? Special Conditions? Comments:Legal Ad:Primary Application #: Reinstatement fee rcvd on 10/20/09 Preliminary Ad (for SRC): tshifflett Request for preliminary site plan approval for the construction of a 12,000 square foot commercial office building. The application also requires a modification of Section 18 -4.2.5 of the Zoning Ordinance in order to allow critical slope disturbance. The property, described as Tax Map 78, Parcel 11, contains 0.849 acres. The property is zoned Highway Commercial. This site is located in the Rivanna Magisterial District at the southwest corner of Olympia Drive (under construction), approximately 760 feet east of its intersection with Town and Country Lane (private). The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Urban Area 3. Critical Slopes Ad ONLY (for PC): Proposal for a waiver to Zoning Ordinance Section 18- 4.2.3.2 "Location of Structures and Improvements" to allow disturbance of critical slopes, pursuant to Section 4.2.5 and in conjunction with the review of a preliminary site plan. The property, described as Tax Map 78, Parcel 11, contains 0.849 acres zoned HC -EC (Highway Commercial and Entrance Corridor.) The site is located in the Rivanna Magisterial District on the south side of Olympia Drive (under construction) approximately 760 feet east of its intersection with Town and Country Lane [private]. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Urban Density in Urban Area 3. SUB APPLICATION INFORMATION Add Sub - Application » STATUS TRACKING Add Status Date Entered: 08/07/2009 Entered By: Eileen Wittwer on 08/07/2009 Type Sub App Date Status Status Date Preliminary - Non - residential 08/07/2009 Under Review 08/07/2009 Preliminary - Non - residential 08/07/2009 Under Review 08/07/2009 Denied 10/07/2009 Comments Comments APPLICATION CONTACT INFORMATION I Selected Application Number.... SDP200900062 Add Contact » ` Contact Type Owner /Applicant Entered By: Eileen Wittwer on 08/07/2009 NO Contractor Selected Name HURT INVESTMENT COMPANY Street Address 195 RIVERBEND DR HURT INVESTMENT COMPANY City / State CHARLOTTESVILLE VA Tustin Shimp Zip Code 22911-Phone # ( ) Free Bridge Auto Fax # ( ) Cellular # ( ) E-mail