The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSDP200800135 Review Comments 2008-09-29Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District September 29, 2008 2134 Berkmar Dr Charlottesville, VA 22901 9755-0224 TO Megan Yaniglos Planning Department RE: Soils Report and Comments fol Y4i .... --_— is `24 . 26C 8C 3 37C3 36C '— y v r 4D,f37C3 'C ) 368 Brunch i 1 h v , 37 [3 3 81Q 14C 137C3 L 8 r Y 36C SC3 91 91 - z _ 8$ r- 828 5B 91 368 a I9B88 f 0 78 36B $ C SB 21C3/ 35E W 1 75 G3iC3 3783 C tl 818 7B , 4D 4E 31C3 $7D3 acv •"' °8 a# - 78 _- E r 568 7 17 ^ 16370337C337C 7' cr 74E z - if !- "., 3P 3763 * *§ t 3C3. s 66E* 4E r 31p 7D3 4E 36C 368 i Ltckt'ig u o D . 5 17 77 4E 2OC3 4E w w37D3 36 4E, 7Bo w nw 4E 3634 4 1 ib 37C3 36F 76 87D3 38G ?kE 36L r 4D 4E - SC 3 37L?37C3 4D336B':V j 3 43 3 37p3 s / 8C3 w r/ \\7Da 37b3 7B 3783 78' 37C3 36 36C 366 ownsville Q / 7B & _+ ' o ° 3 763 36c 8,9 36 36C w54 i358 ,7 " ,'.; 36B r • 4 ry ! 36B / u i , u jok 3 198 37C 6 a - r , 5C ..$ G3 1 ',;i3fiC3' - " 35B •. I. 368Y. 4€ 3bD.. - Y 36B 'tt7Q#f. 37C3 lC C3 37D3 (° / 3 ;. .1 -4. 36D D337C33783 ;7 1`4C 36C —F 3 6 39D7tij36CQ7C 3C3 566 -•GkE . 1 37C3- M` / O 3% 'F . ,O 56C -d• - 4E4'= i.0 3 - • -.. r / 76 92 76 ti 733753Ci 77' 0 27C n 27D 37C W:4Er: 36C p 55B / //7 /36B 0 F5C ( y5 USDA united States Natural Department of Resources Agriculture Conservation Service Prepared by: Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Conservation District 434 - 975 -0224 Soils Report SOILS REPORT FOR: BB & T - Crozet Soil Survey Area: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Unit: 14C Chester loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Chester is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a moderate available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 3e. The Virginia soil management group is D. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 36B Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hayesville is a gently sloping to moderately sloping, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 2e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 36C Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hayesville is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit: 37C3 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to 1 S percent slopes, severely eroded Description Category: Virginia FOTG Hayesville is a strongly sloping to moderately steep, very deep, well drained soil. Typically the surface layer is clay loam about 7 inches thick. The surface layer has a moderate content of organic matter. The slowest permeability is moderate. It has a high available water capacity and a low shrink swell potential. This soil is not flooded and is not ponded. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. The land capability classification is 4e. The Virginia soil management group is X. This soil is not hydric. Map Unit. 88 Udorthents, loamy Description Category: Virginia FOTG No description available for Udorthents, loamy. Small Commercial Buildings - Dominant Condition Thomas Jefferson SWCD 1 9/29/08 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 14C Chester loam, 7 to 15 Very limited percent slopes Soil Name 36B Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited Not hydric percent slopes percent slopes 36C Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 Very limited Not hydric percent slopes percent slopes 370 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to Very limited Not hydric 15 percent slopes, severely percent slopes eroded Hayesville clay loam, 7 to 88 Udorthents, loamy Not Rated Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 14C Chester loam, 7 to 15 Somewhat limited percent slopes Soil Name 36B Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 Somewhat limited Not hydric percent slopes percent slopes 36C Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 Somewhat limited Not hydric percent slopes percent slopes 37C3 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to Somewhat limited Not hydric 15 percent slopes, severely percent slopes eroded Hayesville clay loam, 7 to 88 Udorthents, loamy Not Rated Mapunit Hydric Rating Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 14C Chester loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 36B Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 Not hydric percent slopes 36C Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 Not hydric percent slopes 37C3 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to Not hydric Thomas Jetterson SWCD 2 9/29/08 15 percent slopes, severely eroded 88 Udorthents, loamy Partially hydric Soil Shrink - Swell - Dominant Soil Top Depth: 0 Bottom Depth : 0 Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 14C Chester loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes 36B Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 1.5 High percent slopes 36C Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 1.5 percent slopes Moderate 37C3 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to 1.5 Moderate 15 percent slopes, severely eroded eroded 88 Udorthents, loamy 0 Corrosion Concrete - Dominant Condition Soil Survey: Albemarle County, Virginia Survey Status: Published Correlation Date: 12/01/1981 Distribution Date: 10/21/2002 Map Symbol Soil Name Rating 14C Chester loam, 7 to 15 High percent slopes 36B Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 Moderate percent slopes 36C Hayesville loam, 7 to 15 Moderate percent slopes 37C3 Hayesville clay loam, 7 to Moderate 15 percent slopes, severely eroded Thomas Jetterson SWCU 3 9/7908 xl a A ' cc d'A .- a t , J aL Mtc - Or /6 - q. og COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 October 7, 2008 Mr. William Horton 6330 N. Center Drive, Suite 144 Norfolk, Virginia 23502 RE: SDP - 2008- 135 - BB &T- Major Site Plan Amendment Mr. Horton: Fax (434) 972 -4126 The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as applicable, are attached: Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Engineer) Albemarle County Division of Zoning & Current Development (Planner) Albemarle County Division of Planning (E91 1) Albemarle County Division of Zoning Inspections Albemarle County Division of Planning (Architectural Review Board) Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue Albemarle County Service Authority Virginia Department of Transportation Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that could affect approval of the proposed project. Please make the revisions that have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification for not incorporating such revisions. Submit eight (8) full size copies and one (1) I I" x 17" copy to the Department of Community Development including responses to each of the attached comments of the Site Review Committee by October 20, 2008. Failure to submit this information by this date will result in suspension of the review schedule. Review will resume when revisions are submitted along with a reinstatement fee of $65. Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Megan Yaniglos Senior Planner Zoning & Current Development i OW J t, County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Bill Horton (wsh @handp.com) From:Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner Division:Zoning & Current Development Date:October 7, 2008 Subject:SDP - 2008 -t35- BB &T- Major Site Plan Amendment The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] L The site plan can not be approved until the special use permit (SP2008 -028) has been approved. See comments for special use permit, attached. 2. 132.5.6 (b)] Coordinate the site plan with the special use permit plan. Some of the parking spaces are being shown in a different configuration on the special use permit plan. Also, the reduction in stacking spaces has not been approved by the Zoning Administrator to date. 3. [32.5.6 (i)] Provide the following information for Route 250, state route numbers, right - of -way lines and widths, centerline radii, and pavement widths. Also, show the distance to the centerline of the nearest existing street intersection from the proposed ingrees and egress. 4. [32.6.5] Revise the plan sheets to be at 1 " =20', so that Route 250 is shown on each sheet. 5. 132.6.6 (j)] Provide a luminaire schedule of all proposed lighting. Indicate in the schedule all lighting options chosen, and the colors proposed for the fixtures and poles. Provide the cut sheets for the light fixtures on the plan. All proposed lighting exceeding the 3,000 lumens threshold shall be a full cut off design. Lighting values shall not exceed '/z foot candle at a public right -of -way line or at a property line adjoining a residential or rural area district. Also, the LLF for the proposed fixtures shall be 1.0. 6. [32.7.9] Show the grading and all utilities on the landscape plan to verify that there are no conflicts with proposed landscaping. 7. 132.7.9.7 (b)] Provide a schedule that indicates that the interior landscaping requirement is being met. Also, Cornus Florida is an ornamental tree and the requirements for interior landscaping are for one large or medium shade tree per ten parking spaces. Provide the proper amount of shade trees to meet this requirement. 8. 132.7.9.7 (c)] When a parking lot is located such that the parked cars will be visible from a public street, then additional landscaping of low street shrubs, planted in a single row five (5) feet on center, shall be required between the street and the parking lot. Provide supplemental landscaping in the area between the parking lot and Route 250 in order to meet this requirement. 9. [32.7.9.8] In the plan set provided, there wasn't a detail provided for the screening around the dumpster or the mechanical yard. Provide the detail for this screening. If the fence or wall is not six (6) feet in height, then landscape screening per this section must be provided. 10. (32.7.9.91 Provide tree canopy calculations and information in accordance with this section. 11. 14.12.131 The plan submitted removes a required loading space for Building C. Provide a loading space that meets the requirements for Building C. Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext 3004 for further information. 2 Application #: SUP 200800135 ints Project Name:,! BB &T Bank (Crozet) - Major Major Amendment Date Completed:10/03/2008 Reviewer:Andrew Slack E911 Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:NO OBJECTION. Date Completed:09/25/2008 Reviewer:Brent Nelson ARB Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:An ARB application has been received for this proposal and is scheduled for review at the 10/6/08 ARB meeting. The action taken by the ARB (Action Letter) will be posted after the meeting. Date Completed:09/24/2008 Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated September 12, 2008. No comments or conditions. Date Completed:10/01/2008 Reviewer:Max Greene Engineer Z &CD Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:SRC 10/9/08 Amendment to Blue Ridge Shopping Center W PO may be required, check with Glenn. Glenn & Amelia are reviewing request for drive - through under SP200800028 Review Comments: Loading space is required as shown on the Blue Ridge Shopping Center plan. Please show actual existing contours and proposed changes in 1' intervals. [18- 32.6.6, 14 -302] Drive -up windows require 6 total spaces for drive up customers. one at the window and 5 spaces for stacking. [184.12.6] Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 aervice Auth4rity TO: Megan Yaniglos FROM: Gary Whelan, Civil Engineer DATE: September 25, 2008 RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: BB & T Bank (Crozet) - Major SDP200800135 TM 56 -110 The below checked items apply to this site. X 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for: X A. Water and sewer B. Water only C. Water only to existing structure D. Limited service X 2. A 12 inch water line is located approximately 85' distant. 3. Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is Gpm + at 20 psi residual. X 4. An 8 inch sewer line is located approximately 100' distant. 5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed. X 6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future easements. 7. and plans are currently under review. 8. and plans have been received and approved. X 9. No plans are required. 10. Final and plans are required for our review and approval prior to granting tentative approval. 11. Final site plan may /may not be signed. 12. RWSA approval for water and /or sewer connections. 13. City of Charlottesville approval for sewer. Comments: Backflow prevention is required. Provide a plumbing fixture count and projected flows. DEQ will need the flow numbers to certify the pump station size. The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows: meter locations water line size waterline locations sewer line size sewer line locations expected wastewater flows easements expected water demands 168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977 -4511 • Fax (434) 979 -0698 www.serviceauthoriy.org K., w -asP DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHARLOTTESVILLE RESIDENCY OFFICE. 701 VDOT WAY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22911 DAVID S. EKERN. P.E. COMMISSIONER October 7' 2008 Mr. Glenn Brooks Department of Engineering and Development 101 McIntire Rd. Charlottesville, VA 22902 Subject: Site Review Meeting Comments October 9 2(x)8 site review meeting Dear Mr. Brooks: Below are VDOT's comments on the Site Plans for the October 9' 2008 Site Review Committee Meeting: SDP- 2008 -00066 Hunters Way Site Plan Amendment -Major (Megan Yaniglos) 1. Stippled area needs to be shown to the edge of pavement on Route 1146. 2. All other comments provided in the June 19' 2008 site review letter from VDOT have been adequately addressed. SDP - 2008 -00135 BB &T Bank (Crozet) -Major (Megan Yaniglos) 1. The proposed bank site will generate 592 weekday trips, 110 VPH in the PM peak hour, and 171 VPD on a Saturday according to the ITE trip generation numbers. 2. This site does not exceed the number of trips to require a Chapter 527 study 3. The site will use an approved entrance from Route 250 in connection with the Blue Ridge Shopping site plan. SDP -2008 -00136 Airport Road Office Plaza- Preliminary (Elizabeth Marotta) 1. This site will produce about 100 VPH in the peak hour into the site from the intersection at Airport Road. The build out traffic for Timberwood needs to be added to the plan to determine if a right turn lane is warranted. If the build out traffic on Timberwood exceeds 150 VPH a right turn lane will be warranted. 2. An entrance profile in accordance with the CG -I 1 standard needs to be shown on the plan. 3. The sidewalk needs to be adjusted with the shift in the entrance location and CG -12's need to be added at the entrance. SDP - 2008 -00139 Green House Coffee - Preliminary (Gerald Gatobu) 1. The existing slot drain needs to be replaced with curbing and tied into the curbing on the adjacent site. 2. The right of way on the southern side of the property should be adjusted off the centerline of Route 810 and lined up with the right of way on the northern side of the property. 3. The length and width of the proposed entrance will cause accessibility issues for two way traffic on the site. WE KEEP VIRGINIA "40V11'+G SUB 2008 -00219 Kia Dealership -Final (Megan Yanialos) 1. No comments Please request the applicants provide a written description of revisions with re- submissions. if you have any questions or comments, please contact me prior to sharing these comments with the applicants. Sincerely, Joel DeNunzio, P.E. Staff Engineer VDOT Charlottesville Residency 43.1 -293 -0011 cc Bill Fritz, David Benish, Juan Wade, Elaine Echols, Joan McDowell, Judith Wiegand, Margaret Maliszewski, David Pennock, Francis McCall, Jon Sharp, Summer Frederick, Patrick Lawrence, and John Giometti IPA KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Page 1 of 1 Philip Custer From:Philip Custer Sent:Friday, February 20, 2009 3:36 PM To:Joe Turner' Cc:Bill Horton Subject: RE: BB &T Crozet - SDP200800135 - Final Major Site Plan Amendment Thanks Joe. I just have two comments on the profile of the pipe; the rest of the changes look good. In the profile, please show the crossing of the sanitary line. Please also specify the throat length of the DI in either the profile or the schedule. From: Joe Turner [mailto:jct @handp.com] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 3:09 PM To: Philip Custer Cc: Bill Horton Subject: BB &T Crozet - SDP200800135 - Final Major Site Plan Amendment Mr. Custer: I have attached PDF copies of sheets C2 & C4 which address your comments dated February 19, 2009. Our responses to your comments are as follows: Comment 1 — Sidewalks without bumper blocks were widened to 6 ft (from back of curb to edge of walk). Sidewalks with bumper blocks were widened to 5 ft (from back of curb to edge of walk). (Sheet C2) Comment 2 — STOP signs and DO NOT ENTER signs were added to both sides of the stop bar adjacent to the drive -thru. A stop bar was added on the east side of the sight adjacent to the main entrance drive to the shopping center as discussed this afternoon. A directional arrow and ONE WAY sign were added to the north end of the site at the by -pass lane. A note for traffic control signs and marking standards was added to sheet C2. (Sheet C2) Comment 3 — A profile & proposed drainage schedule of the new drainage inlet and pipe was added to sheet C4. The proposed pipe invert at structure 106 was raised by 0.10 ft. If you have any additional comments or questions, please call 757 - 681 -2329. Thank you, Joseph C. Turner Engineering Designer 6330 North Center Dr. Building 13, Suite 141 Norfolk, VA 23502 Phone: 757 - 461 -4009 - Fax: 757 - 461 -3971 Email: jct@handp.com - Web: www.handp.com HURT PROFFITT i N C O R P O A A T C 0 2/20/2009 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 -4596 Phone (434) 296 -5832 Fax (434) 972 -4126 Project: BB &T Bank Crozet; Final Major Site Plan Amendment [SDP200800135] Plan preparer: Hurt and Proffitt, Inc. Owner or rep.: Blue Ridge Investors, LLC Plan received date: 26 January 2009 Date of comments: 19 February 2009 Reviewer: Phil Custer 1. Sidewalks must be 5ft, exclusive of curb. If no bumper blocks are provided in the adjacent parking spaces, then the sidewalks must be 6ft wide. 2. Please add traffic control signs and /or more pavement markings. 3. Please provide a profile of the new drainage inlet and pipe. This profile must meet all requirements of the engineering review checklist. There must be a change in elevation between the invert in and invert out of structure 106. Application #: MP20080013. Short Review Cof'Y rnients Project Name: BB &T Bank (Crozet) - Major Major Amendment Date Completed: 09/25/2008 Reviewer: Brent Nelson ARB Review Status: Requested Changes Reviews Comments: An ARB application has been received for this proposal and is scheduled for review at the 10/6/08 ARB! meeting. The action taken by the ARB (Action Letter) will be posted after the meeting. Date Completed: 09/24/2008 Reviewer: Jay Schlothauer Inspections Review Status: No Objection Reviews Comments: Based on plans dated September 12, 2008. No comments or conditions. Date Completed Reviewer: Max Greene Engineer Z &CD Review Status: Pending Reviews Comments: SRC 10/9/08 Amendment to Blue Ridge Shopping Center WPO may be required, check with Glenn. Glenn & Amelia are reviewing request for drive - through under SP200800028 Review Comments: Loading space is required as shown on the Blue Ridge Shopping Center plan. Please show actual existing contours and proposed changes in 1' intervals. [18- 32.6.6, 14 -302] Drive -up windows require 6 total spaces for drive up customers. one at the window and 5 spaces for stacking. [18- 4.12.6] Page: 1.00 County of Albemarle Printed On: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 1 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Sara Wingate (SWINGATE @LAMBERTAI.COM) From: Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner Division: Zoning & Current Development Date: September 17, 2008 Subject: SP- 2008 -028- BB &T- Special Use Permit The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) I. If the travelway is proposed as one -way behind stacking space, indicate that it is one -way with a notation, as well as show the dimension of the width of the travelway. 2. Provide the turning movements for the third stacking space in the middle lane. It appears that a vehicle may not be able to make that turn if the other lanes are full. This information can be submitted as an additional exhibit (8.5 x 1 1 or I I x 17) and not a full sheet. 3. Remove any and all notes on Sheet A 1 that are no longer valid. There are several arrows, notes, curb line, drawn that are not relevant for this current layout. 4. Provide sidewalk to all seven of the parking spaces that are located to the south of the proposed bank. Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext 3004 for further information. of AI, County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Bill Horton (wsh@handp.com) From:Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner Division:Zoning & Current Development Date:October 7, 2008 Revl: November 7, 2008 Subject: SDP - 2008 -135- BB &T- Major Site Plan Amendment The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] The site plan can not be approved until the special use permit (SP2008 -028) has been approved. See comments for special use permit, attached. Rev 1: Comment not addressed. The site plan has been deferred by the applicant on 11. 5.08 until the special use permit has been approved. 32.6.6 0)] Provide a luminaire schedule of all proposed lighting. Indicate in the schedule all lighting options chosen, and the colors proposed for the fixtures and poles. Provide the cut sheets for the light fixtures on the plan. All proposed lighting exceeding the 3,000 lumens threshold shall be a full cut off design. Lighting values shall not exceed `/ foot candle at a public right -of -way line or at a property line adjoining a residential or rural area district. Also, the LLF for the proposed fixtures shall be 1.0. Rev 1: Comment not addressed. A note has been added to the plan that indicates a LLF of 1.0, however the luminaire schedule on sheet C6 shows a LLF factor as .65. The LLF factor must be 1.0. 11. [4.12.13] The plan submitted removes a required loading space for Building C. Provide aloadingspacethatmeetstherequirementsforBuildingC.1. Rev 1: Comment not addressed. The loading space for Building C must beaddressedbeforetheapprovalofthissiteplan. The developer has submitted a minor site plan amendment that is currently under review that would resolve this comment. This minor amendment will need to be approved before theapprovalofthemajorsiteplanamendmentforBB &T. Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296 -5832 ext3004forfurtherinformation. C;4410V.-, GTZ14-fT pF A0 County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To:Bill Horton (wsh @handp.com) From:Megan Yaniglos- Senior Planner Division:Zoning & Current Development Date:October 7, 2008 Revl: November 7, 2008 Subject: SDP - 2008 -135- BB &T- Major Site Plan Amendment The Planner for the Zoning & Current Development Division of the Albemarle County Department Community Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle County Code.] d . The site plan can not be approved until the special use permit (SP2008 -028) has been approved. See comments for special use permit, attached. Rev 1: Comment not addressed. The site plan has been deferred by the applicant on Ic ` 11 5.08 until the special use permit has been approved. t dina e ss "3 woi e ) ' ; . S: t lil ' 'gig ,.< .:l e' perlTirt p1i17i. Cit) €Tlt' t7t Clle par "lClll space; are being shown in =t di.l'.tere:rtt ct>nligt7z<rttc7n an the special use pertnit plan. Also the reduction in stacking spaces has not been approved by the Zoning Administrator to date. Rev 1: Comment adeguately addressed. 3. [32.5.6 (i)] l'rov ide the fall owin iz60MIatiOn for Route 250: slate rouse numbers. right- of'-way limes aTld widths. centerline radii, and pavement widths. Also, show the distance to the centerline of the .nearest existing street intersection from the . proposed ingrees and egress. Rev 1: Comment adequate v addressed 12.0.5] Revise the plan sheets to be at 1 –20% so that..R.oute 250 is sh<,wn tin each sheet. Rev .l: Comment adeqrrarelF adih6 .Yeds 32.6.6 (j)] Provide a luminaire schedule of all proposed lighting. Indicate in the schedule all lighting options chosen, and the colors proposed for the fixtures and poles. Provide the cut sheets for the light fixtures on the plan. All proposed lighting exceeding the 3,000 lumens threshold shall be a full cut off design. Lighting values shall not exceed 'h foot candle at a public right -of -way line or at a property line adjoining a residential or rural area district. Also, the LLF for the proposed fixtures shall be 1.0. Rev l: Comment not addressed. A note has been added to the plan that indicates a LLF of 1. 0, however the luminaire schedule on sheet C6 shows a LLF factor as .65. The LLFfactor must be 1.0. 32. i ,9] Show Ells: grading and. all utilities on the landscape plan io verity thai there are no conflicts with proposed landscapixrg. Rev .l: Comment adequately addressed 7. [32.7,U (b)] Provide a schedule that indicates that the interior landscaping requiren ent is being rnet.. Also, Corrius flon'da is an onianaental tree and tle requirements for interior lindscapin gwv. for one large or "le shade tree leer tell Parking spaces, Provide the Proper amount of shade trees to n this reqUireillent, Rev I. Comment atlequare v addressed. 8. [3207.9. (c)] When a parking lot is located such that flic parked cars will be visible ftorn a public street, then additional landscaping of low street shrubs. planted in zi single row five ( feet on center. shall be required betwee enth1 street ::uid the parking lot. Provide suppleniental landscaping in the area between the. parking , lot and Route 250 in order to I•neet this requirement. Rev 1: Comment adequately addressed. 9. [32, 11 - 1 the plan set provided, there wasn't i dewil provided ibi• the screening around the dumpster or the mechanical yard.. Provide the detail - for this screening, If the C fence or wall. is not six (6) 1'ect in heigh ing per this provided, 1, then lanctscape screcql' p 'is section must be Rev 1: Comment adequately addrtwssed. 10, [3/ 2 —f '7 9-9] Provide tree canopy calculations and. illfb=aijon In accordance with this sectiom 1 : Comment addresseel,004 [4.12.13] The plan submitted removes a required loading space for Building C. Provide a loading space that meets the requirements for Building C. 1. Rev 1: Comment not addressed. The loading space for Building C must he addressed before the approval of this site plan. The developer has submitted a minor site plan amendment that is currently under review that would resolve this comment. This minor amendment will need to be approved before the approval of the major site plan amendment for BB& T. Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296-5832 ext 3004 for further information. SDP200800135 BB &T Major Fite Plan Amendment Megan Yaniglos From: Gary Whelan [gwhelan @serviceauthority.org] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 11:57 AM To: Megan Yaniglos Subject: SDP200800135 BB &T Major Site Plan Amendment Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Megan, Page 1 of 1 No plans are required for ACSA review and approval. Backflow prevention is required and projected waste water flows will be needed to ensure that the pump station has adequate capacity. Other than these comments, the ACSA takes no exception to the BB &T plan. Gary 2/12/2009