Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201600038 Staff Report 2016-04-29n;z.:1100(111U1MRw;7*1IWANT17.1131F. 1WW;701z)'AN Project #/Name ARB -2016-38: Gropen Design & Fabrication Facility Final Review Type First review of a Site Development Plan, including architecture Parcel Identification 090000000035VO Location On the west side of Rt. 20 approximately 700' south of Somerset Farm Drive Zoned Light Industry (LI)/Entrance Corridor (EC) Owner/Applicant Ronayne LLC/Design Develop LLC (Bob Pineo) Magisterial District Scottsville Proposal To construct an addition to house offices and a fabrication shop, with associated site improvements. Context The subject parcel is the former site of Parham Construction. The Roof Center is located on the parcel to the north. Other industrial parcels are located along Avon Street to the north and west. The east side of Rt. 20 is a rolling landscape with residences, some on large parcels, and a mountain backdrop. Visibility The proposed addition will have some visibility from the Rt. 20 Entrance Corridor. The site is raised above the level of the EC by approximately 15'-20' and there are some trees and scrubby vegetation at the top of the slope. These factors limit some visibility. The greatest visibility will be for traffic heading north, with a view of the southeast corner of the building available just beyond the entrance drive. Southbound traffic will have much reduced visibility. ARB Meeting Date May 2, 2016 Staff Contact Margaret Maliszewski PROJECT HISTORY The ARB previously reviewed a sign application for Parham Construction at this site in 2006. REF GUIDELINE ISSUE RECOMMENDATION Structure design 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development The proposed addition uses a 25' -grid Key proposed materials within the designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that structural system. The uniform grid to the elevations and new development within the corridors reflects the traditional system is found in historic and include a material/color architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the purpose of ARB contemporary industrial buildings and it legend on the elevation review and of these Guidelines, that proposed development can establishes a rhythm in the elevations sheets. within the designated Entrance Corridors reflect elements of that can be articulated by openings in the design characteristic of the significant historical landmarks, wall. In the proposed addition, 12' -wide Consider a non-metallic buildings, and structures of the Charlottesville and windows that are divided by mullions finish for the metal Albemarle area, and to promote orderly and attractive establish that rhythm. panels. development within these corridors. Applicants should note that replication of historic structures is neither required nor The walls of the proposed addition would desired. be faced with Thermaclad insulated metal panels with a smooth finish. The 2 Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites as proposed metal panel color is cool ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order to metallic silver (Varco Pruden Buildings). accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and vegetation A highly reflective surface would not be characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines require attention appropriate for the EC. The EIFS would to four primary factors: compatibility with significant be painted "gunmetal gray". The existing historic sites in the area; the character of the Entrance building would be painted gray to match Corridor; site development and layout; and landscaping. the addition. 3 New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the traditions of the architecture of The metal panels would be accented with historically significant buildings in the Charlottesville and composite wood siding (Woodtone rustic Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the series "Summer wheat" with trim in area, as well as drawings of architectural features, which "Mountain cedar") at the southeast corner provide important examples of this tradition are contained in of the building and wide EIFS surrounds Appendix A. at the windows to the north. These surrounds project from the metal wall 4 The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility with surface for added detail, texture and the area's historic structures is not intended to impose a rigid depth. The rhythm and detail of the design solution for new development. Replication of the windows help to soften the appearance of design of the important historic sites in the area is neither the length of the wall and establish scale. intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, The single pitched roof and the scale of and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is the proposed addition are consistent with contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow the forms and scale of traditional individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as industrial and agricultural buildings of well as special functional requirements. the area. 9 Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors and textures should be compatible Overall, the proposed addition does not with the forms and features of the significant historic have an obvious historic appearance, but buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the it uses forms, scale and materials that are buildings described in Appendix A [of the design compatible with historic industrial guidelines]. The standard of compatibility can be met buildings of the area. through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The proposed development will result in The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle a general clean-up of the site, which will County is not the objective of these guidelines. contribute to orderly and attractive development along the EC. The building materials are not identified on the 1/8" elevation drawings. 5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish Buildings along this stretch of Rt. 20 None. a pattern of compatible architectural characteristics predate the establishment of the ECs. The throughout the Entrance Corridor in order to achieve unity existing building on site is a pre - and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate engineered metal building with ribbed sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance metal siding that doesn't meet the EC Corridor. Where a designated corridor is substantially guidelines. A primary feature of the developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful building is loading bays on the north, east balance between harmonizing new development with the and west elevations. existing character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area. The proposed addition measures 150' long x 50' wide x 27' and 32' tall (with 10 Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings. the lower height facing the EC). This size is compatible with the 135' x 70' existing 12 Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive building. whole. The single pitch roof and the rectangular form of the addition, as well as the consistent building colors, will help establish a cohesive whole. The introduction of different detailing and additional materials in the new addition helps to achieve a more appropriate appearance for the EC. 11 The overall design of buildings should have human scale. The scale of the building is broken down None. Scale should be integral to the building and site design. with a series of windows that are divided with mullions. An entrance canopy at 12' high further establishes human scale for people entering the building on the south side. 13 Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building Although metal panels are the primary None. design should be relieved using design detail or vegetation, building material, the typical industrial or both. building application of metal siding with no relief is improved here with the addition of composite wood siding at the corner and a series of large windows, some with enhanced surrounds. 14 Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting The proposed addition is physically None. devices should be used to unify groups of buildings within a connected to the existing building on the development. west side. The connector is located north of the entrance courtyard. It is not visible from the EC. 15 Trademark buildings and related features should be modified The proposed addition is not a trademark None. to meet the requirements of the Guidelines. design. 16 Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly Windows are brushed aluminum Indicate on the plans the tinted or highly reflective. Window glass in the Entrance storefront with clear, low -E coating. The VLT and VLR for the Corridors should meet the following criteria: Visible light information submitted does not indicate proposed window glass. transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light VLT or VLR. Add the standard window reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on glass note to the the proposed window glass should be submitted with the drawings. application forfinal review. Accessory structures and equipment 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated Chain link fence currently surrounds None. into the overall plan of development and shall, to the extent much of the property. Fencing along the possible, be compatible with the building designs used on the south side will be removed with this site. proposal. Chain link fence along the EC frontage would remain. 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a negative visual impact on the Entrance The proposed addition will shield the Corridor street, screening should be provided to eliminate existing building and existing loading visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas, docks, service and storage areas from d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, f. Above -ground view. Loading docks are to be located on utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire, and the west and north elevations of the similar security fencing devices. addition and aren't expected to be visible. Mechanical equipment is to be located at 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may the rear of the site or between the consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing. buildings. 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the The note does not appear on the plans. Add the standard architectural plan: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated." note to the plan. Li htin 22 Light should be contained on the site and not spill over onto There is one small area of spillover along Adjust the lighting design adjacent properties or streets; the EC frontage. Illumination there to eliminate spillover in reaches .9 footcandles at the property excess of .5 fc at the line. property line along the EC. 23 Light should be shielded, recessed or flush -mounted to 15 pole lights are proposed. Two would Provide the cut sheets for eliminate glare. All fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 have Bega fixtures, which are full cutoff the light fixtures on one lumens or more must be full cutoff fixtures. fixtures. 13 would be American Electric of the site plan sheets. Lighting fixtures. The plans do not have Note on the plan all sufficient information to confirm that options chosen for the they are full cutoff. Cut sheets were not fixtures. Ensure that all included in the submittal. fixtures emitting 3000 lumens or more are full No exterior wall lights are shown on the cutoff fixtures. plan. If exterior building - mounted lights are proposed, include complete information on the plan. 24 Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate for Light levels reach a maximum of 12.6 fc. None. display lots in the Entrance Corridors. Lower light levels will apply to most other uses in the Entrance Corridors. 25 Light should have the appearance of white light with a warm The Bega fixtures have LED lamps. The Revise the light fixtures soft low; however, a consistent appearance throughout a American Electric Lighting fixtures have to have a consistent lam site or development is required. Consequently, if existing high pressure sodium lamps. There are type. lamps that emit non-white light are to remain, new lamps existing pole lights at the site. The may be required to match them. illumination from these lights does not If existing site lighting is appear to be include in the photometrics. to remain, include all relevant information on the lighting plan (locations, lamp type, fc levels, etc.). 26 Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors for Pole and fixture colors have not been Revise the lighting plan free-standing pole mounted light fixtures in the Entrance identified. to identify the pole and Corridors. fixture color. 27 The height and scale of freestanding, pole -mounted light Pole fixtures are specified at 16' and 20' Indicate on the lighting fixtures should be compatible with the height and scale of tall. It is not clear from the drawing if plan if bases are proposed the buildings and the sites they are illuminating, and with the bases are proposed for the poles. for the light poles. If they use of the site. Typically, the height of freestanding pole- are, adjust the design so mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors should not that maximum pole exceed 20 feet, including the base. Fixtures that exceed 20 height is 20', including feet in height will typically require additional screening to the height of the base. achieve an appropriate appearance from the Entrance Add a note to the plan Corridor. confirming this. 28 In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance Corridors, the individual context of the site will be taken into consideration on a case by case basis. 29 The following note should be included on the lighting plan: The note does not appear on the plans. Add the standard lighting "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits note to the plans. 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." Landscaping 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping The full EC frontage is not shown on the Revise the landscape plan are intended to reflect the landscaping characteristic of many plans. There are some existing trees and to show the full extent of of the area's significant historic sites which is characterized scrub vegetation along the chain link the EC frontage on the by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping should promote fence at the top of the slope that fronts plan. visual order within the Entrance Corridor and help to the EC. The applicant has indicated that integrate buildings into the existing environment of the most of this existing vegetation is to If existing trees to remain corridor. remain because it screens the parking lot and it stabilizes the slope. The scrub in are intended to meet landscape requirements, 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials that share this area has the untidy appearance that identify those trees by similar characteristics. Such common elements allow for characterizes this type of vegetation, and species and size. Add more flexibility in the design of structures because common the existing chain link fence is visible in trees as necessary to meet landscape features will help to harmonize the appearance of some places. The landscape plan shows size and quantity development as seen from the street upon which the Corridor individual trees to remain in this area, but requirements. is centered. does not identify the trees by size or species. This information, and Correct all of the plant 32 Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the following: representation of the full frontage, is calculations on the a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the needed to confirm that the existing landscape plan and show Entrance Corridor Street. Such trees should be at least 3'/2 vegetation meets minimum planting the required plants. inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the ground) and requirements. The existing trees do not Correct the frontage should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees appear to meet the 35' spacing measurement on CO. 1. should be located at least every 35 feet on center. requirement. b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be interspersed among the trees required by the The landscape calculations on the preceding paragraph. The ornamental trees need not alternate landscape plan state that the Route 20 one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted frontage is only 93' long and only 3 trees among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern. are required along the frontage. This c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence information is wrong and the frontage or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the measurement shown on CO.1 is also not frontage of the Entrance Corridor street. accurate. The information regarding d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing interior parking lot trees is also wrong. plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel to the The calculations reference 8 proposed Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right-of-way perimeter parking lot trees, but there and utility easements. don't appear to be any perimeter trees on the plan. A proposed warm season grass meadow near the southeast corner of the addition is identified on the colored 11 x 17 landscape plan. A group of trees at the south end of the front parking lot is meant to transition from the meadow to the existing vegetation along the EC frontage. The meadow is not specified on the landscape plan that is part of the official site plan. The low height of a meadow planting would provide for a view of the new building from the south. The meadow planting is consistent with the rural character of the east side of Rt. 20. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: No trees are proposed along the entrance Provide large trees along a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. drive. the entrance drive, 2%2" Such trees should be at least 2'/z inches caliper (measured six caliper at planting, 40' on inches above the ground) and should be of a plant species center. common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 40 feet on center. 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: Trees are not proposed along the path and Provide medium trees a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior sidewalk that leads from the side parking along the path and pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 2%2 inches lot to the building entrance. sidewalk that leads from caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should the side parking lot to the be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be building entrance, 2%2" located at least every 25 feet on center. caliper, 25' on center. 35 Landscaping of parking areas: Trees are not proposed along the Provide perimeter a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, perimeter of the southern parking lot. parking lot trees, 40' on located 40 feet on center. Trees should be planted in the Existing vegetation is proposed to remain center, 21/2" caliper interior of parking areas at the rate of one tree for every 10 along the EC frontage. Trees in this area minimum at planting, parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed would also qualify as perimeter trees for along the southern throughout the interior of the parking area. the front parking area. parking row. b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 21/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be planted in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected by curbing. c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height. 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: Red maples are proposed in pairs along None. a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front the EC -facing elevation of the addition. of long buildings as necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type of such trees or vegetation should be determined by the length, height, and blankness of such walls. b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height. 37 Plant species: The proposed plant species appear on the None. a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff various lists. based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D). 38 Plant health: The note does not appear on the plan. Add the standard plant The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All health note to the plan. site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of theplant." Site Development and layout 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural The addition is oriented parallel to the None. landscape and should contribute to the creation of an EC. The circulation in and around the site organized development plan. This may be accomplished, to has already been established. There are the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling no sidewalks along Rt.20 in this area. The terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets site is already developed; wooded area to and pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect native the west would remain. The primary view forest elements; insuring that any grading will blend into the in the area is to the east with the surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous mountain backdrop. This view won't landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, existing change as a result of this proposal. significant river and stream valleys which may be located on the site and integrating these features into the design of surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor. 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor street and to other development within the corridor should be as follows: a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian walks should guide the layout of the site. b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be parallel to the street. Building groupings should be 10 arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor street. c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems. d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas on and around the site. Site Gradin 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site Grading is proposed primarily between None. to surrounding conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls the east and south parking areas at the and by shaping the terrain through the use of smooth, rounded south corner of the building. The result is land forms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut or fill expected to be generally consistent with sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours on the the existing appearance. No retaining grading plan shall be rounded with a ten foot minimum radius walls are proposed. where they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the There does not appear to be any grading None. drip line of any trees or other existing features designated for within the drip line of trees to remain. preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment control plans. 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Tree protection is shown on the plan. None. Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion of the development of the site. 10 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment within this area. 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be None. designed to fit into the natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from the Entrance Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features. 44 Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. The appropriateness of the proposed meadow planting. 2. The appropriateness of retaining the existing trees and scrub vegetation along the EC frontage; the need for supplemental planting; the chain link fence to remain 3. The appropriateness of the architectural design of the building for the EC 4. The metallic finish of the metal panels Staff offers the following comments on the proposal: 1. Key proposed materials to the elevations and include a material/color legend on the elevation sheets. 2. Consider a non-metallic finish for the metal panels. 3. Indicate on the plans the VLT and VLR for the proposed window glass. Add the standard window glass note to the drawings: Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. 4. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the plan: Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated. 5. Adjust the lighting design to eliminate spillover in excess of .5 fc at the property line along the EC. 6. Provide the cut sheets for the light fixtures on one of the site plan sheets. Note on the plan all options chosen for the fixtures. Ensure that all fixtures emitting 3000 lumens or more are full cutoff fixtures. 7. If exterior building -mounted lights are proposed, include complete information on the plan. 8. Revise the light fixtures to have a consistent lamp type. 9. Confirm that no previously existing lighting is to remain. If there is existing site lighting to remain, include all relevant information on the lighting plan (locations, lamp type, fc levels). 10. Revise the lighting plan to identify the pole and fixture color. 11. Indicate on the lighting plan if bases are proposed for the light poles. If they are, adjust the design so that maximum pole height is 20', including the height of the base. Add a note to the plan confirming this. 11 12. Add the standard lighting note to the plans. "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle." 13. Revise the landscape plan to show the full extent of the EC frontage on the plan. 14. If existing trees to remain are intended to meet landscape requirements, identify those trees by species and size. Add trees as necessary to meet size and quantity requirements. 15. Correct all of the plant calculations on the landscape plan and show the required plants. Correct the frontage measurement on CO.1.Provide large trees along the entrance drive, 2%2" caliper at planting, 40' on center. 16. Provide medium trees along the path and sidewalk that leads from the side parking lot to the building entrance, 2%2" caliper, 25' on center. 17. Provide perimeter parking lot trees, 40' on center, 2%2" caliper minimum at planting, along the southern parking row. 18. Add the standard plant health note to the plan. "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant." TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items: Sheet # Drawing Name Drawing Date Sheet # Drawing Name Drawing Date CO.0 Cover 3/21/2016 C5.0 Grading Plan 3/21/2016 C0.1 Overall Plan 3/21/2016 C6.0 Stormwater Management Plan 3/21/2016 CLO Notes Details 3/21/2016 ELL Photometric Plan 3/21/2016 C2.0 Existing Conditions, Demolition Plan 3/21/2016 LLOO Planting Plan 3/21/2016 C3.0 Erosion & Sediment Control Notes & Details 3/21/2016 Al First Floor 3/21/2016 C3.1 Erosion & Sediment Control Notes & Details 3/21/2016 A2 Second Floor 3/21/2016 C3.2 Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Phase 1 3/21/2016 A3 East and West Elevations 3/21/2016 C3.3 Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Phase 2 3/21/2016 A4 North and South Elevations 3/21/2016 C4.0 Layout Plan 1 3/21/2016 ARB Submittal: Project narrative, vicinity map, existing conditions (5), historic precedents, adjacent industrial context, existing conditions, human scale, Route 20 proposed northbound, south elevation, east elevation, view from Route 20 northbound, view from Route 20 southbound, entrance axis, southeast perspective, northeast perspective, southwest aerial, site section, proposed landscape plan, exterior building materials. 3/21/2016 Material samples: Composite siding: Woodtone rustic series "Summer wheat"; Composite trim: Woodtone Rustic series "Mountain Cedar"; Metal panels: Insulated metal panels, Varco Pruden Buildings: Cool Metallic Silver, smooth finish; paint: Benjamin Moore: Timber wolf 1600 and gunmetal 1602; storefront: clear anodized plus YKK AP YSln; Glass: Dodson Glass, 1" IG Energy #3SF; 12