Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201600002 Correspondence 2016-01-29 New Noire Margaret Maliszewski From: Ryan Lorey <RLorey@edens.com> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 12:15 PM To: Margaret Maliszewski Subject: FW: Jared 2583 Charlottesville VA ARB submittal Attachments: SC and SD.PDF Margaret, Let me know if the attached is not helpful. PAR3OL CMH—the ceramic metal halide lamp UNV—universal voltage Regards, Ryan Lorey AIA, LEED AP BD+C, CCS PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT MANAGER EDENS 7200 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 400 Bethesda, MD 20814 P (301) 347-3731) From: Patterson, Jason [mailto:jpatterson@frch.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 11:58 AM To: Ryan Lorey Cc: Brad Dumont; Goodwin, Bryan; Waterman, Mike (mwaterman@jewels.com) Subject: RE: Jared 2583 Charlottesville VA ARB submittal Please see attached. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks Jason Patterson, RA, LEED AP Director Specialty Retail Architecture FRCH Design Worldwide 513-241-3000 main, 513-362-3404 direct www.frch.com,jpattersonfrch.com From: Ryan Lorey [mailto:RLorey@edens.coml Sent: Friday,January 29, 2016 11:54 AM To: Patterson,Jason <jpatterson@frch.com> Cc: Brad Dumont<BDumont@edens.com>; Goodwin, Bryan <bgoodwin@frch.com>; Waterman, Mike (mwaterman@jewels.com) <mwaterman@jewels.com> Subject: FW:Jared ARB submittal Jason, Could you please clarify light fixture info for exterior lights per the email below? 1 STERLIN =WELERS TYPE SC, SD and SX(C TBD) Nu"' Noire Features • Integrated energy-saving LED technology • High CRI for rendering architectural highlights and decor • Widespread downlight distribution with cut-off • Architectural aluminum construction, sealed and gasketed for weatherproofing and durability • Available in a variety of popular finishes to complement most commercial environments • Cool operation for extended lamp and component life • Easy to install and maintain; easy to clean and re-lamp Applications The P6W Downlight is ideal for producing a grazing effect on textured finishes, for an interesting effect wherever it is used. It is ideal for aesthetic illumination of inner and outer walls, fa- cades, entrances, and anywhere near-wall illumination or a grazing effect is desired. . Enclosure The durable, die-cast aluminum enclosure protects the lamp and internal components. With a simple, aesthetic design, the shape and finishes blend with most corporate environments to complement the existing architecture. Dimensions Reflector 1c. , An internal reflector projects light in the downward direction, `' "r` Tx with cut-off. The high grade, spun aluminum reflector is highly =. specular to make the most use of the lumen output. Calculated 1 } 1 III ,:, placement of each type of lamp ensures that light escapes the % ' "' ``�" aperture in a controlled pattern. ,r �� s — :...ti Diffuser 1 _, ID i o i The optional diffuser is a clear, tempered glass lens, sealed :1m: = and gasketed to the enclosure. This is necessary to obtain the IP23 for outdoor applications. An optional baffle is available for concentrating the beam. Lam ping The P6W Downlight is designed to operate with 15W LED, CF ballasts are also equipped with a RFI circuit to eliminate compact fluorescent (42W max.), metal halide (50W max.), any electromagnetic interference. Dimming ballasts and emer- and incandescent lamps (100W max.), for design and applica- gency ballasts are optional. tion flexibility. The LED source is capable of producing remark- LED Driver able spectral characteristics, with CRI of 94% and CCT of The LED source is controlled by an advanced electronic driver, 3,368°K, excellent for rendering highlights and foliage. for cool, flicker-free operation, and energy savings. Built from Socket quality components, the driver delivers consistent power and All sockets used are compatible with other components in the extends LED lamp life. The integral mount is standard and supplied system. Overall, production is in compliance with remote mount is optional. North American and European electrical standards; see Com- LED Dimmer pliances. The optional LED dimmer can be installed into a standard Ballasts switchbox. It controls the intensity of the light output over the Electronic compact fluorescent and pulse-start metal halide upper 90% of the range (10% min. to 100% max.). Integrated ballasts used with the P6W Downlight share many attributes pulse width modulation (PWM) technology ensures a consis that contribute to the quality of light, energy savings and tent color temperature(CCT)when making adjustments, for no safety: color shifts or blurs. You can adjust the amount of light while maintaining the same quality. • Virtual flicker-free operation • High ballast factor of 1.0 for maximum lumen maintenance Mounting • High power factor greater than 90% The mounting canopy is formed of high-grade aluminum. Mount on a flat surface, directly over a standard 4" electrical • Low THD: CF< 10%; MH < 15% junction box with 3-1/2" holes center-to-center, in the vertical • Sound rated"A"for the most quiet operation position. • EOL protection switches output OFF on lamp burnout Finishes • Environmentally friendly, containing no PCB's The P6W Downlight is finished with a durable polyester pow- • Color-coded leads for easy installation der-coat. More powder-coated base finishes, and RAL colors • Manufactured to ISO9002 Quality System Standards are available. See the TMS Standard Color Chart. Product Key Photometric Data P6W I-I I-I I-I I-I Indoor Classification 1 2 3 4 CIE Type: Direct Spacing Criterion(varies with lamp type) 1. Lamp 0-180°: 2.02 A IN100W 90°-270°: 2.02 B CF26W PL-T PAR30L CMH Diagonal: 1.90 C CF32W PL-T Outdoor Classification D CF42W PLT IES Classification: Type VS E MH50W ED-17 Longitudinal Classification: Very Short F 15W LED Cut-off Classification: Cut-off 2. Voltage Candelas per 15a 1 120V 1,000 lumens 2 277V ti3_ 3 347V(consult TMS) UNV 4 220 to 240V 3. Finish F05 White - F15 Matte Black . F16 Gloss Black '7.; -; CUSTOM COLORS - .- ;,- >Y F18 Satin Aluminum (BC) BLACKK CHERRY . ee s ; F21 Architectural Bronze AND(DW)DRIFTWOOD ` • F31 Silver Metallic F## Other TMS Finishes(see color chart) RL RAL Colors(specify) • 4. Options l__,,_ a DMD Dimming Ballast Advance Mark 10(CF only) - -• DMDL Dimming Ballast Lutron(consult TMS) Vertical Plane @ 0°H — (above) (CF only) Vertical Plane @ 90°H : -_.__..---------- (below) BU Emergency Ballast Remote(consult TMS) Angle of Max. Intensity: OH 35V (CF only) BFL6 Anti-glare Baffle Warranty BGL6 Bottom Glass Lens IP44 (consult TMS) TMS Lighting covers this product by a limited warranty for a period of three (3) years from the date of purchase, and Custom lamps are covered by warranty for the period of lamp life TMS Lighting can customize this and many of our standard specified by the manufacturer. This warranty is effective only fixtures. Dimensions, lamp types, and colors could be modi- when the products are used within the parameters of the rec- fied to suit your lighting quality and architectural require ommended operating environment. Install in areas where the ments. ambient temperature does not exceed 50°C/122°F. Compliances The P6W Downlight is UL and USTC listed, complies with the Consultants Europe directives,and rated up to IP44 (with bottom glass lens), for indoor and outdoor applications. cOus I P44t1STC`( E Specifications are subject to change without notice. Margaret Maliszewski From: Ryan Lorey <RLorey@edens.com> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 7:00 AM To: Margaret Maliszewski Subject: RE: window films Attachments: Jared Glass Clarification.pdf Margaret, Sorry for the confusion. I marked up the attached to clarify the vision glass, 'G'filmed glass(mocked up), and 'H' translucent filmed glass at the one bay on the rear. The 'H' will be lit at night so the window glows to appear transparent. This would just look like the shades are pulled down during the day. Hope this is helpful. Regards, Ryan Lorey AIA, LEED AP BD+C, CCS PLANNING & DEVM.OPMENT MANAGER EDENS 7200 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 400 Bethesda, MD 20814 P30I.'47.37d-) From: Margaret Maliszewski [mailto:MMaliszewski@albemarle.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 2:54 PM To: Ryan Lorey Subject: window films Ryan, I have questions about the window films for Jared.The elevations show 4 treatments/rendering styles: 1. White 2. Gray labeled "G" 3. Gray labeled "H" 4. White/gray at main entrance 1. Is 1 meant to be plain, untreated vision glass? 2. 2 is meant to be the glass with the bronze film, right? 3. Is 3 the glass with the white and frost films?Why are the white and frost films used instead of the bronze? 4. Is 4 really just plain, untreated glass, or something else? Thanks for your help. Margaret Margaret M.Maliszewski,Principal Planner Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-5832 x3276 1 -e D March 11, 2016 Ms. Margaret M. Maliszewski Principal Planner Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-5832 x3276 MMaliszewski@albemarle.org Re: ARB201600002: The Shops at Stonefield G1 Amendment(Jared) Dear Ms. Maliszewski, Following are responses to the ARB Comments from both the February 16, 2016 and March 7, 2016 meetings regarding The Jared Building at the Shops at Stonefield. Proposed changes resulting from the February 16 comments were presented at the March 7 meeting. The enclosed drawings represent the proposed plans to date, incorporating comments from both meetings. 1. Lighten the color palette of the proposed building to increase compatibility with the existing buildings of the shopping center. The color palette is now adjusted to align with that of the other Parcel G Buildings as recommended by ARB. The revised palette will ensure visual harmony among the Parcel G Buildings while variations in material detailing and use will enable the G1 building to have degrees of individuality and architectural interest. The same synthetic stucco color is used along the frieze of the proposed building as is used on the façade of Buildings G3 and G4 on the parcel, drawing a clear connection among the structures. A white birch-colored brick is proposed for the primary wall fields to provide additional texture and individuality to the proposed building while aligning with the bright white color scheme. A beige brick base anchors the building with a slightly heavier-feeling color tone that also aligns with the beige on adjacent Parcel G buildings. Also, please note the cornice line has been simplified and modernized through removal of the projecting molding appearance. This detail aligns with that employed on Buildings G3 and G4, drawing further architectural relation. 2. Coordinate the materials shown in the sample board and the finish schedule. The finish schedule has been adjusted to align with the sample board. The newly proposed"A"brick sample will be sent for ARB review. 3. Clarify on the drawings the appearance of the back of the raised bays. Provide an appropriate appearance for the Entrance Corridor. The rear of each raised bay will be finished in the same manner and material as the sides and front, with synthetic stucco of the same color, such that the raised element appears as a complete mass, not an open screenwall. 4. Revise the design of the top part of the raised bays to scale down the wall area between the top cornice and the secondary cornice. The height of the raised bays is reduced in effort to achieve a proportion more appropriate to the reminder of the building as well as to the other buildings on Parcel G. The height is reduced by 36 t__ r `"✓ inches, allowing for a projection of 38 % inches above the main parapet line. With a height of 26'-2 '/a, the raised bay is comparable to the raised bays on G3 and G4(26'-8'). 5. Provide a detail of the cornice located between the brick and the EIFS to clarify its appearance. A dentil detail is included within the revised drawings on Sheet 02. 6. Identify on the drawings the paint color for the service door. The service doors on the north elevation visible from the Entrance Corridor are reduced in quantity to one. The remaining service door is now integrated within the window system and is an aluminum door. The aluminum is proposed to be finished to match in color to the adjacent glass to provide a homogenous appearance. 7. Call out more completely on the drawings the locations proposed for all window films. Provide for review additional information to clarify the appearance of the windows and window films. Show how the windows will have an appropriate appearance for the ECs. Locations of filmed glazing are clarified on the elevations as Materials G and H. The intent is for filmed glazing to be perceived as vision glazing in daylight under general observation. Film Material H will provide a translucent quality ideal for backlighting at night to the central portico windows on the north elevation as described further under Item 14. UPDATE FROM MARCH 7 MEETING: Applicant prepared a sample mockup of the film using 12-inch square glass and film samples for ARB viewing. Reference enclosed Sheet 08 for the mockup images. The mockup of the proposed glazing and film was conducted and photographed under various sky conditions, including overcast, mid-morning sun, and mid-afternoon sun. The intent of the mockup is to convey that the proposed film, 3M Scotchcal 3030-69, when applied to glazing immediately adjacent to a vision glass panel,provides a nearly identical appearance to the vision glass when observed under the different daytime light conditions. Windows will therefore read monolithically with no indication that some portions of glazing are filmed, to the typical, casual observer. The use of filmed glazing permits the implementation of fenestration on the building facade in locations where internal,programmatic functions require a solid, opaque wall surface, thereby accommodating the tenant's program and ensuring an architecturally interesting facade appropriate for the project's prominent location on the Entrance Corridor. 8. Revise the architectural elevations to include the service yard wall that extends from the north elevation and indicate materials/colors on the drawings. Consider moving the north service door and related items to the west elevation. Elevations are revised to incorporate the trash area screen walls and doors. Materials are now identified on the elevations. The service doors on the north elevation are reduced in quantity from three to one. The remaining service door is now integrated with the window system and is finished to match the surrounding glazing. 9. Provide for review a photometric diagram showing the footcandles at ground level produced by the proposed wall fixtures. -e The Lighting Plan has been adjusted to indicate Footcandle readings directly under each fixture. Light levels at perimeter lot lines are analyzed and shown to be unchanged. 10. Coordinate all site, grading, utility, landscape and lighting drawings with the new building footprint. Noted. The Landscape Plan submitted indicates no significant change to the landscape plan. As the building footprint is slightly smaller than the previously-approved plan, softscape areas immediately surrounding the building footprint are extended to meet the building. A small extension of the sidewalk around the northeast corner of the building is shown to serve the single, remaining service/ secondary egress door. The design team will work with the Civil Engineer, WW Associates, to record all necessary adjustments and submit a Letter of Revision to the County. 11. Note that separate sign applications will be required for the wall signs. The sign submittal should show sign type, color, illumination, etc. as outlined in the approved comprehensive sign plan. Noted, Applicant intends to comply with the approved Comprehensive Sign Plan. See also item 12 below. 12. Eliminate the diamond light from the proposal. UPDATE FROM MARCH 7 MEETING: The diamond has been eliminated from the cornice line. It will be incorporated as an integral part of the overall sign and will be compliant with the approved Comprehensive Sign Plan. Please reference revised Sheets 02 and 03. 13. Reduce the scale of the sign letters. Sign letters are proposed to be in compliance with the approved Comprehensive Sign Plan. 14. Reconsider the level of detail on the north elevation to be more consistent with the entrance elevation. The north elevation is redesigned per the recommendations of ARB. Applicant understands the importance of this façade as it faces oncoming, southbound Entrance Corridor traffic and very closely abuts the roadway. The redesign aims for this elevation to be perceived as an important façade appropriate to its prominent location and orientation. - Additional fenestration is added, flanking the central portico element and windows. - The service/secondary egress door on the north elevation, previously located near the prominent northeast corner, is shifted adjacent to the northwest corner, further from the EC. - The east-facing service door is removed from the plan entirely. - The one service/secondary egress door on the north elevation is incorporated into one of the "punched"openings in the masonry wall, grouped with the windows, such that it is intentionally unified, rather than appearing as a randomly-placed metal door in a masonry wall. - Awnings are proposed above the new windows to provide additional visual interest. e four large window units in the central portico are proposed to be filmed.with. ,.translucent material and internally illuminated so they glow and appear as vision glass at night, further est57Tshing the mfereg—iff cTinmporfance of th durinn:theF day and night - CornJbe Ilnes gre'simprfled and modernized and the material pallet is adjusted to more closely align with the color and character of the other Parcel G buildings. The Jared building will act as a prominent gateway element made possible by the proposed improved facade with common architectural links to the other adjacent buildings. i -e E DF: 1 J =Yz `a." ... Thank you for your review and continued support. Please let me know of questions. Regards, Ryan Lorey, AIA, LEED AP BD+C Planning & Development Manager EDENS 7200 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 400 Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 347-3736 Margaret Maliszewski From: Ryan Lorey <RLorey@edens.com> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 9:42 AM To: Margaret Maliszewski Subject: RE: Jared windows Attachments: 23 A14.pdf; REAR PORTAL ELEVATION.pdf; LIT WINDOW.jpg; 20160406_082358.jpg Margaret, Thanks for your comments. Responses: 1. Some of the windows that have the opaque bronze film are in the open sales area and the credit department. Why can't these be full vision glass? Jared has display cases and furniture that line and abut exterior walls. To avoid seeing the backs of furnishings through the window which might appear cluttered and unorganized,they and we prefer a solid area up to a wainscot height that conceals everything but still gives the appearance of grander windows on the exterior. I understand their display case layout and interior functionality to be very thoroughly programmed so the customer experience is planned and controlled. There are also some programmatic functions that they do not want vision glazing adjacent to for security reasons. Sales areas, displays, and support functions are specifically located with determined relationships to one another;a trait that unfortunately does not lend itself to flexibility or adjusting the plan too significantly. Getting those rear doors adjusted previously was a big win. 2. It looks like adjustments to interior walls on the EC side of the building would allow for windows there to be full vision glass. Why can't this be done? Same reasoning as above. 3. To achieve the effect you've described for the center window on the north elevation, it looks like you'll be installing lights just for the purpose of creating the special effect. Is that correct? Do you have any photos of that treatment lit at night? That is correct. They would be discretely tucked around the window on the inside so the light sources are not directly visible from the exterior and to wash light evenly across the glass. Attached is an example image. It is a nice approach to ensure the facade is enlivened both day and night. 4. Can you provide a photo of the cornice dentil detail from an existing building? Yes,see attached photo. A drawing detail is also attached. 5. The cornice color listed in the schedule is "white dove". This was not a previously approved color. I don't have a sample, but I will need one. Do you have one available? I will send a sample for delivery tomorrow. Here is an image. It is just another shade of white. Noe w w F-- (-D z O O U U Cr) _I N LT_ O W W • O wl 0• II Q J ISI W cn M J J C7 4 Z � L: 0, � Y p U Z Q w m • ci_ w � 2 NNW Nue 'I „,7 f o 01 / CD CQ _\ Z \ O \I ( iil CD O \ O N N z_ z U. LL LL V LL 3 0 \ in W N J i— w CI M m \ 1 °C o al / / // / J . 1117 R IIZ in ch Z W J W 0 co Q 1 Q d® Z f0 .I , ..Z , Q N / r'.._.\ O .QUI 6-,I 1-1 1-1 II 111111 111111 111111111 -4 IlN April 29, 2016 Ms. Margaret M. Maliszewski Principal Planner Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville,VA 22902 434-296-5832 x3276 MMaliszewski@albemarle.org Re: ARB201600002: The Shops at Stonefield G1 Amendment(Jared) Dear Ms. Maliszewski, Following are responses to the ARB Comments from your letter dated April 22, 2016, and both the February 16, 2016 and March 7, 2016 meetings regarding The Jared Building at the Shops at Stonefield. Proposed changes resulting from the February 16 comments were presented at the March 7 and April 18 meetings. The enclosed drawings represent the proposed plans to date, incorporating comments from both meetings. Comments from April 22, 2016 Letter 1. Remove the patina green metal from the materials schedule. The material has been removed from the Schedule on Sheet 02. The Schedule is clouded to indicate the change. 2. Include Rear Portal Elevation detail in architectural drawing set. Add a note to the detail showing that the colors match those on the front of the portal. The drawing and note are added to Sheet 02 and are clouded to indicate the change. Comments from February 16, 2016 and March 7,2016 ARB Meetings(previously addressed) 1. Lighten the color palette of the proposed building to increase compatibility with the existing buildings of the shopping center. The color palette is now adjusted to align with that of the other Parcel G Buildings as recommended by ARB. The revised palette will ensure visual harmony among the Parcel G Buildings while variations in material detailing and use will enable the G1 building to have degrees of individuality and architectural interest. The same synthetic stucco color is used along the frieze of the proposed building as is used on the facade of Buildings G3 and G4 on the parcel, drawing a clear connection among the structures. A white birch-colored brick is proposed for the primary wall fields to provide additional texture and individuality to the proposed building while aligning with the bright white color scheme. A beige brick base anchors the building with a slightly heavier-feeling color tone that also aligns with the beige on adjacent Parcel G buildings. Also, please note the cornice line has been simplified and modernized through removal of the projecting molding appearance. This detail aligns with that employed on Buildings G3 and G4, drawing further architectural relation. 2. Coordinate the materials shown in the sample board and the finish schedule. The finish schedule has been adjusted to align with the sample board. The newly proposed"A"brick sample will be sent for ARB review. -f IN 73 3. Clarify on the drawings the appearance of the back of the raised bays. Provide an appropriate appearance for the Entrance Corridor. The rear of each raised bay will be finished in the same manner and material as the sides and front, with synthetic stucco of the same color, such that the raised element appears as a complete mass, not an open screenwall. 4. Revise the design of the top part of the raised bays to scale down the wall area between the top cornice and the secondary cornice. The height of the raised bays is reduced in effort to achieve a proportion more appropriate to the reminder of the building as well as to the other buildings on Parcel G. The height is reduced by 36 inches, allowing for a projection of 38%inches above the main parapet line. With a height of 26'-2 4" the raised bay is comparable to the raised bays on G3 and G4(26'-8'). 5. Provide a detail of the cornice located between the brick and the EIFS to clarify its appearance. A dentil detail is included within the revised drawings on Sheet 02. 6. Identify on the drawings the paint color for the service door. The service doors on the north elevation visible from the Entrance Corridor are reduced in quantity to one. The remaining service door is now integrated within the window system and is an aluminum door. The aluminum is proposed to be finished to match in color to the adjacent glass to provide a homogenous appearance. 7. Call out more completely on the drawings the locations proposed for all window films. Provide for review additional information to clarify the appearance of the windows and window films. Show how the windows will have an appropriate appearance for the ECs. Locations of filmed glazing are clarified on the elevations as Materials G and H. The intent is for filmed glazing to be perceived as vision glazing in daylight under general observation. Film Material H will provide a translucent quality ideal for backlighting at night to the central portico windows on the north elevation as described further under Item 14. UPDATE FROM MARCH 7 MEETING: Applicant prepared a sample mockup of the film using 12- inch square glass and film samples for ARB viewing. Reference enclosed Sheet 08 for the mockup images. The mockup of the proposed glazing and film was conducted and photographed under various sky conditions, including overcast, mid-morning sun, and mid-afternoon sun. The intent of the mockup is to convey that the proposed film, 3M Scotchcal 3030-69, when applied to glazing immediately adjacent to a vision glass panel,provides a nearly identical appearance to the vision glass when observed under the different daytime light conditions. Windows will therefore read monolithically with no indication that some portions of glazing are filmed, to the typical, casual observer. The use of filmed glazing permits the implementation of fenestration on the building facade in locations where internal, programmatic functions require a solid, opaque wall surface, thereby accommodating the tenant's program and ensuring an architecturally interesting facade appropriate for the project's prominent location on the Entrance Corridor. -e 8. Revise the architectural elevations to include the service yard wall that extends from the north elevation and indicate materials/colors on the drawings.Consider moving the north service door and related items to the west elevation. Elevations are revised to incorporate the trash area screen walls and doors. Materials are now identified on the elevations. The service doors on the north elevation are reduced in quantity from three to one. The remaining service door is now integrated with the window system and is finished to match the surrounding glazing. 9. Provide for review a photometric diagram showing the footcandles at ground level produced by the proposed wall fixtures. The Lighting Plan has been adjusted to indicate Footcandle readings directly under each fixture. Light levels at perimeter lot lines are analyzed and shown to be unchanged. 10. Coordinate all site,grading, utility, landscape and lighting drawings with the new building footprint. Noted. The Landscape Plan submitted indicates no significant change to the landscape plan. As the building footprint is slightly smaller than the previously-approved plan, softscape areas immediately surrounding the building footprint are extended to meet the building. A small extension of the sidewalk around the northeast corner of the building is shown to serve the single, remaining service/ secondary egress door. The design team will work with the Civil Engineer, WW Associates, to record all necessary adjustments and submit a Letter of Revision to the County. 11. Note that separate sign applications will be required for the wall signs. The sign submittal should show sign type,color, illumination,etc. as outlined in the approved comprehensive sign plan. Noted, Applicant intends to comply with the approved Comprehensive Sign Plan. See also item 12 below. 12. Eliminate the diamond light from the proposal. UPDATE FROM MARCH 7 MEETING: The diamond has been eliminated from the cornice line. It will be incorporated as an integral part of the overall sign and will be compliant with the approved Comprehensive Sign Plan. Please reference revised Sheets 02 and 03. 13. Reduce the scale of the sign letters. Sign letters are proposed to be in compliance with the approved Comprehensive Sign Plan. 14. Reconsider the level of detail on the north elevation to be more consistent with the entrance elevation. The north elevation is redesigned per the recommendations of ARB. Applicant understands the importance of this façade as it faces oncoming, southbound Entrance Corridor traffic and very closely abuts the roadway. The redesign aims for this elevation to be perceived as an important facade appropriate to its prominent location and orientation. - Additional fenestration is added, flanking the central portico element and windows. - The service/secondary egress door on the north elevation, previously located near the prominent northeast corner, is shifted adjacent to the northwest corner, further from the EC. - The east-facing service door is removed from the plan entirely. - The one service/secondary egress door on the north elevation is incorporated into one of the "punched"openings in the masonry wall, grouped with the windows, such that it is intentionally unified, rather than appearing as a randomly-placed metal door in a masonry wall. - Awnings are proposed above the new windows to provide additional visual interest. - The four large window units in the central portico are proposed to be filmed with a translucent material and internally illuminated so they glow and appear as vision glass at night, further establishing the interest and importance of the facade during the day and night. - Cornice lines are simplified and modernized and the material pallet is adjusted to more closely align with the color and character of the other Parcel G buildings. The Jared building will act as a prominent gateway element made possible by the proposed improved facade with common architectural links to the other adjacent buildings. Thank you for your review and continued support. Please let me know of questions. Regards, 4641 Ryan Lorey, AIA, LEED AP BD+C Planning & Development Manager EDENS 7200 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 400 Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 347-3736 1 Noe COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development REVISED APPLICATION SUBMITTAL This form must be returned with your revisions to ensure proper tracking and distribution.County staff has indicated below what they think will be required as a resubmission of revisions. If you need to submit additional information please explain on this form for the benefit of the intake staff. MI plans must be collated and folded to fit into legal size files,in order to be accepted for submittal. TO: Margaret Maliszewski DATE: PROJECT NAME: ARB-2016-02: The Shops at Stonefield G1 Amendment(Jared Jewelry Store) Submittal Type Requiring Revisions(>indicates Submittal Code County Project Number #Copies Erosion& Sediment Control Plan(E&S) Mitigation Plan(MP) Waiver Request(WR) Stormwater Management Plan(SWMP) Road Plan(RP) Private Road Request,with private/public comparison(PRR) Private Road Request—Development Area(PRR-DA) Preliminary Site Plan(PSP) Final Site Plan(or amendment)(FSP) Final Plat(FP) Preliminary Plat(PP) Easement Plat(EP) Boundary Adjustment Plat(BAP) Rezoning Plan(REZ) Special Use Permit Concept Plan(SP-CP) Reduced Concept Plan(R-CP) Proffers(P) Bond Estimate Request(BER) Draft Groundwater Management Plan(D-GWMP) Final Groundwater Management Plan(F-GWMP) Aquifer Testing Work Plan(ATWP) Groundwater Assessment Report(GWAR) Architectural Review Board(ARB) ARB2016-2 1 Other: Please explain (For staff use only) Submittal Code #Copies Distribute To: Submittal Code #Copies Distribute To: ARB 1 Margaret Maliszewski -e t-DEDS February 24, 2016 Ms. Margaret M. Maliszewski Principal Planner Albemarle County Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902 434-296-5832 x3276 MMaliszewski@albemarle.org Re: ARB201600002: The Shops at Stonefield G1 Amendment(Jared) Dear Ms. Maliszewski, Following are responses to the ARB Comments from the February 16, 2016 meeting. Revised drawings reflecting the changes are enclosed. I understand the short review time between your receipt of this response and the next ARB meeting scheduled for March 7, 2016, but would very much appreciate your permission to present these changes at that time if at all possible. 1. Lighten the color palette of the proposed building to increase compatibility with the existing buildings of the shopping center. The color palette is now adjusted to align with that of the other Parcel G Buildings as recommended by ARB. The revised palette will ensure visual harmony among the Parcel G Buildings while variations in material detailing and use will enable the G1 building to have degrees of individuality and architectural interest. The same synthetic stucco color is used along the frieze of the proposed building as is used on the facade of Buildings G3 and G4 on the parcel, drawing a clear connection among the structures. A white birch-colored brick is proposed for the primary wall fields to provide additional texture and individuality to the proposed building while aligning with the bright white color scheme. A beige brick base anchors the building with a slightly heavier-feeling color tone that also aligns with the beige on adjacent Parcel G buildings. Also, please note the cornice line has been simplified and modernized through removal of the projecting molding appearance. This detail aligns with that employed on Buildings G3 and G4, drawing further architectural relation. 2. Coordinate the materials shown in the sample board and the finish schedule. The finish schedule has been adjusted to align with the sample board. The newly proposed"A"brick sample will be sent for ARB review. , r 3. Clarify on the drawings the appearance of the back of the raised bays. Provide an appropriate appearance for the Entrance Corridor. r- The rear of each raised bay will be finished in the same manner and material as the sides and front, with synthetic stucco of the same color, such that the raised element appears as a complete mass, not an open screenwall. 4. Revise the design of the top part of the raised bays to scale down the wall area between the `3 top cornice and the secondary cornice. The height of the raised bays is reduced in effort to achieve a proportion more appropriate to the reminder of the building as well as to the other buildings on Parcel G. The height is reduced by 36 inches, allowing for a projection of 38 Y inches above the main parapet line. With a height of 26'-2 J M", the raised bay is comparable to the raised bays on G3 and G4 (26'-8"). z, —{e HOFN 5. Provide a detail of the cornice located between the brick and the EIFS to clarify its appearance. A dentil detail is included within the revised drawings on Sheet 02. 6. Identify on the drawings the paint color for the service door. The service doors on the north elevation visible from the Entrance Corridor are reduced in quantity to one. The remaining service door is now integrated within the window system and is an aluminum door. The aluminum is proposed to be finished to match in color to the adjacent glass to provide a homogenous appearance. 7. Call out more completely on the drawings the locations proposed for all window films. Provide for review additional information to clarify the appearance of the windows and window films. Show how the windows will have an appropriate appearance for the ECs. Locations of filmed glazing are clarified on the elevations as Materials G and H. The intent is for filmed glazing to be perceived as vision glazing in daylight under general observation. Film Material H will provide a translucent quality ideal for backlighting at night to the central portico windows on the north elevation as described further under Item 14. 8. Revise the architectural elevations to include the service yard wall that extends from the north elevation and indicate materials/colors on the drawings. Consider moving the north service door and related items to the west elevation. Elevations are revised to incorporate the trash area screen walls and doors. Materials are now identified on the elevations. The service doors on the north elevation are reduced in quantity from three to one. The remaining service door is now integrated with the window system and is finished to match the surrounding glazing. 9. Provide for review a photometric diagram showing the footcandles at ground level produced by the proposed wall fixtures. The Lighting Plan has been adjusted to indicate Footcandle readings directly under each fixture. Light levels at perimeter lot lines are analyzed and shown to be unchanged. 10. Coordinate all site, grading, utility, landscape and lighting drawings with the new building footprint. Noted. The Landscape Plan submitted indicates no significant change to the landscape plan. As the building footprint is slightly smaller than the previously-approved plan, softscape areas immediately surrounding the building footprint are extended to meet the building. A small extension of the sidewalk around the northeast corner of the building is shown to serve the single, remaining service/ secondary egress door. The design team will work with the Civil Engineer, WW Associates, to record all necessary adjustments and submit a Letter of Revision to the County. 11. Note that separate sign applications will be required for the wall signs.The sign submittal should show sign type, color, illumination,etc. as outlined in the approved comprehensive sign plan. Noted, Applicant intends to comply with the approved Comprehensive Sign Plan. See also item 12 below. 12. Eliminate the diamond light from the proposal. -eELDEN5 The diamond in the cornice is a signature element of the building occupant. The Applicant and building occupant respectfully request the ARB reconsider requiring its removal. 13. Reduce the scale of the sign letters. Sign letters are proposed to be in compliance with the approved Comprehensive Sign Plan. 14. Reconsider the level of detail on the north elevation to be more consistent with the entrance elevation. The north elevation is redesigned per the recommendations of ARB. Applicant understands the importance of this façade as it faces oncoming, southbound Entrance Corridor traffic and very closely abuts the roadway. The redesign aims for this elevation to be perceived as an important façade appropriate to its prominent location and orientation. - Additional fenestration is added, flanking the central portico element and windows. - The service/secondary egress door on the north elevation, previously located near the prominent northeast corner, is shifted adjacent to the northwest corner, further from the EC. - The east-facing service door is removed from the plan entirely. - The one service/secondary egress door on the north elevation is incorporated into one of the "punched"openings in the masonry wall, grouped with the windows, such that it is intentionally unified, rather than appearing as a randomly-placed metal door in a masonry wall. - Awnings are proposed above the new windows to provide additional visual interest. - The four large window units in the central portico are proposed to be filmed with a translucent material and internally illuminated so they glow and appear as vision glass at night, further establishing the interest and importance of the façade during the day and night. - Cornice lines are simplified and modernized and the material pallet is adjusted to more closely align with the color and character of the other Parcel G buildings. The Jared building will act as a prominent gateway element made possible by the proposed improved facade with common architectural links to the other adjacent buildings. Thank you for your review and continued support. Please let me know of questions. Regards, 4011 Ryan Lorey, AIA, LEED AP BD+C Planning & Development Manager EDENS 7200 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 400 Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 347-3736