The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUB201600047 Review Comments Final Plat 2016-05-18Short Review Comments Report for: SUB201600047 SubApplication Type: Cascadia Blks 4-7, Phase 2 - Final Final Plat Date Completed:03/28/2016 Reviewer:Megan Yaniglos CDD Planning Review Status:Pending Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:04/13/2016 Reviewer:John Anderson CDD Engineering Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments:1. V2 –Provide deed book/page ref. for: Ex. 20’ Private Drainage Easement (Lots 85-90); Ex. 10’ Private Drainage Easement (Lots 17-30); Ex. Variable Width Landscape Easement (Lots 16-21); and Ex. Sight Distance Easement (Lots 16-17). 2. V2 –Provide ties for E8 and E18. 3. V3 –Although Cascadia Phase 1, blocks 4-7, Final Plat shows curve C48 identical with C64 (Phase 2) as TMP 78-59 residue boundary (recorded 1/5/16, BK4712/PG104), it is important to record boundary C64 (Plat under review) consistent with Cascadia-Fontana connector road. ROAD Plan SUB201400141, Fontana Phase 4C, Sections 1 & 2 was approved 11/10/15. This ROAD plan shows connector alignment inconsistent with C48/C64. Please coordinate interconnection requirements relative to plat approval, Cascadia Phase 2, blocks 4-7, with Planning Division. Approved Fontana Phase 4C ROAD Plan is available for review. Division: Date Completed:03/15/2016 Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA Review Status:Requested Changes Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:03/13/2016 Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated 1/13/16. No comments or objections. Division: Date Completed:06/19/2016 Reviewer:John Anderson CDD Engineering Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments:Engineering review comments, 4/13/16, items 1, 2, have been addressed. Comment #3: in process (READ below). Engineering does not object. 28-Apr 2016 Applicant response (comment 3): “We are coordinating with John Anderson on Fontana connection details and a subdivision waiver will be submitted under separate cover.” ___________________13.Apr 2016 Engineering review comment #3 3. V3 –Although Cascadia Phase 1, blocks 4-7, Final Plat shows curve C48 identical with C64 (Phase 2) as TMP 78-59 residue boundary (recorded 1/5/16, BK4712/PG104), it is important to record boundary C64 (Plat under review) consistent with Cascadia-Fontana connector road. ROAD Plan SUB201400141, Fontana Phase 4C, Sections 1 & 2 was approved 11/10/15. This ROAD plan shows connector alignment inconsistent with C48/C64. Please coordinate interconnection requirements relative to plat approval, Cascadia Phase 2, blocks 4-7, with Planning Division. Approved Fontana Phase 4C ROAD Plan is available for review. Division: Page:1 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On:January 09, 2017 requirements relative to plat approval, Cascadia Phase 2, blocks 4-7, with Planning Division. Approved Fontana Phase 4C ROAD Plan is available for review. Date Completed:05/18/2016 Reviewer:Justin Deel VDOT Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Date Completed:05/13/2016 Reviewer:Megan Yaniglos CDD Planning Review Status:See Recommendations Reviews Comments:Deeds need to be submitted for County attorney review. Update 5/27: Deed submitted and sent to CA on 5/27 Update 7/25: Deed resubmitted after comments and sent to CA office for signature Division: Date Completed:05/18/2016 Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA Review Status:No Objection Reviews Comments: Division: Page:2 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On:January 09, 2017 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper, Virgin a 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner May 18, 2016 Ms. Megan Yaniglos Principal Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Re: SUB -2016-00047 Cascadia Phase 2 Blocks 4-7 Final PIat Dear Ms. Yaniglos: We have reviewed the Final Plat for Cascadia Phase 2 — Blocks 4-7, dated January I3, 2016 with revision dates of March 28 2016 and April 20, 2016, as submitted by Dominion Engineering. Previous comments have been address; VDOT has no objection to the plat as submitted. If you need additional information concerning this project, please do not hesitate to contact me at 434422-9894. Joel D. DeNunzio, P.E. Resident Engineer VDOT - Charlottesville WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Mike Myers From: Megan Yaniglos, AICP- Principal Planner Division: Planning Services Date: March 28, 2016 Subject: SUB -2016-047 Cascadia- Ph 2- Blks 4-7- Final Subdivision Plat The County of Albemarle Planning Division will grant or recommend approval of the Final Plat referenced above once the following comments have been addressed: [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] 1. [14-302 (A)(11)] Provide the deed book and page number under which the property was created. 2. [14-317] Instrument evidencing maintenance of certain improvements. All proposed easements require a deed to be submitted and approved by the County Attorney. 3. [Proffers- ZMA2002-0041 Provide a notation for Lot 90 with the proffer language that states that Broadus Woods has the first right of refusal. Also, see attached comments from engineering regarding the easements needed to build the connection. +) Secondary- Road Interconnections to Bro>Fadus Ba ON[ C'hgrch: The Owner shalt pro %.We liar two (2i Inicrconneetions to Broad us Baptist Church (T l' 62-25C and 2SC1 . For the first intercoiiat xtion, the Owner shall provide Broadui Baptist Church with a thirty (30) foot wine easement that witI a]Iow the Ch to construct a drivewav withIn this tascment. The easerr vnt shall star at the Cascadia properry line shared with 13madus Baptist Church and run genLralIy along the centerline of a Class A trail to the intersection cjf Cascadia Drive and Delphi Lane, as gkmerally shown on the General Devcieprnent Plan, Th; Owner shall this easement for a period ten ( 10) years fhim the record aticyn date of the first plat for this area and pro%ride the easement free of charge to the Church. If the Church does not exercise its right to caustruci a private drive within this 10 year time period, the OWner's obIigat ion to pro vide tliis easement shall he void. For the second intcrconnectiom the Owner shall provide Broadus Baptist Church with a first right o1'reFusal to a Jeri within Cascadia that will provide reasonahle access tt) the Uprer Ixirtions ol-"I'll l' 62-25C and 25Cl . The lot shall he wide enough to wxomm(Aate :i public mad. ll'any grading or drainagc cusemciu5 outNide the: lot .arc required to constr=t the second inlerc:onnection. the Owner shall Vrarit tl,eso* eascments free of charge. if t1w Church docs nrrt exCTC ist its first right t)frefusal at the tithe salc of -this lost. the ()wiit! r's obiigaEion tp provide for this interconnection shall he void, Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296- 5832 ext. 3004 for further information. Megan Yaniglos From: John Anderson Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 6:41 AM To: Megan Yaniglos Subject: RE: Cascadia Proffer Attachments: Fcontana_Cascadia_Connector_copy50.jpg Megan, I recommend 20' (permanent) grading easements for Lots to either side (Final Plat). There is significant vertical fall across Lot 90, front to back. Elev. 480' at Delphi to 460' along the back PL, with just 160' lot depth. A ramp without vertical curves could be built from front to back Lot lines at 12.5%, which is steep for streets —but if we borrow Glenn's interconnection design for Fontana, we see streets require vertical curves. A vertical curve has the effect of steeping tangent grade, but also elevating and lowering upper/ lower vertical curves. Vertical curves lift or lower roads. Viewed in profile, a second interconnection with Broadus Baptist Church would be a mini version of Glenn's Fontana interconnection —but without 5 stations (500') to work with. Ali pr WF vacp— YYb 1 + iY1AL5 u�hLrl'f lr.i��1 k� IN R / 1 6 r If we use 24' width (VDOT Min. C&G width /FC -FC) with 5' walks/ 6' planting strips, interconnection W =47'. This barely fits on a 50 -ft wide lot and would itself require construction easements, but the effect of a vertical curve at Delphi and another on church property with 3:1 (2:1, Max) side -slopes would flare the constructed width to connect edge of walks to existing grade on either side. I expect an interconnection with smooth vertical curves between Delphi and church would require 6'-7' elevation above existing grade at several points. The interconnection would not remain at this elevation, but 3:1 side -slopes at 7' elevation would extend grading 21' to either side over portions of Lot 90. 2:1 side - slopes would require 14'. Lot width is 50' —47' typ. street section uses nearly all this. Then, an additional 15'-20'+ is needed for side -slopes. Lots 89 and 91 would need to be shown with 20' (permanent) grading easements. In the end, retaining walls may aid construction to VDOT standards. We could not accept a ramp design without vertical curves. Interconnection requires Lot 90 be private RW its entire length and width. Thanks for your patience, Megan. to f a xVfto with prolhr J e x SX 475,0 1 r Y g r 44 1 r \ + r •. r 1 =, A � I t i 5 i` s 1 �� t � • 4�' F I[ � ky ''1 I � 4 *VOW .40100 Of" 1 .,.. C "7•.,:fr..??4 •.a.,,,1- COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Orange Road Culpeper,Virginia 22701 Charles A. Kilpatrick,P.E. Commissioner March 23, 2016 Ms. Megan Yaniglos Senior Planner County of Albemarle Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902 Re: SUB-2016-047 Dear Ms. Yaniglos: We have reviewed the Final Plat for Cascadia—Phase 2 - Blocks 4-7,dated January 13, 2016, as submitted by Dominion Engineering and offer the following comments: 1. On sheet V2,the 20', 30',and 40' private drainage easements located between Lot 82 and Lot 83 should be a 20',30' and 40' public drainage easements,respectively and in accordance with the approved road plans. 2. On sheet V2, the 20' private drainage easement located on the 50' Preservation Area should be a 20' public easement, in accordance with the approved road plans. Where is the water generating from? If you need additional information concerning this project, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sin - e , ) J.el D. DeNunzio, P.E. •esident Engineer VDOT- Charlottesville WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Megan Yaniglos From: Alex Morrison<amorrison@serviceauthority.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 11:45 AM To: Megan Yaniglos Cc: mmyers@dominioneng.com Subject: SUB2016032: Cascadia Phase 2 - Final Plat and SUB2016047: Cascadia Phase 2 Blocks 4-7 Final Plat Megan, I have reviewed the 2 plats referenced above and have the following comments: • SUB2016032 o Add "Proposed" to the new ACSA sanitary Sewer easement callout. o Revise the existing ACSA easement callouts to the following: ■ If they have been recorded, add the DB and Page. ■ If they have not yet been recorded call them out as "Proposed (20'/Variable Width) ACSA (Sanitary Sewer/ Waterline) easement as shown on SUB20XXXXX". • SUB2016047 o Update the proposed easement callouts to "Proposed (20'/Variable Width) ACSA (Sanitary Sewer / Waterline) Easement". o Update the private lateral easements for lots 83-85 based on the 3/14/16 approvals from John Anderson and Michael Vieira to shift the alignment. ■ Extend the private lateral easement across the open space parcel as well, terminating at the existing Hyland Ridge offsite sewer easement. Alexander J. Morrison, P.E. Civil Engineer Albemarle County Service Authority 168 Spotnap Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22911 (0) 434-977-4511 Ext. 116 (C) 434-981-5577 (F) 434-979-0698