HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201500115 Review Comments 2016-06-07 APPLICATION REVIEW HISTORY
ARB #/Name_ARB 2015-115, Shell Signs @ 2212 Ivy Road
ACTION DATE NOTES
County received application 09-08-2015
Corresponding submittal 09-08-2015 deadline
deadline/ARB meeting date 10-19-2015 meeting
Transfer from intake to ARB Staff 09-09-2015
First ARB staff review 09-09-2015 Completeness check
09-22-2015 Checklist check
Comments to applicant 09-25-2015 Email
12-31-15 Email with amended comments
Resubmittal received by staff 10-02-2015 Email indicating revisions will be coming.
01-07-2016 Revised drawings received
Resubmittal reviewed by staff 02-03-2016
Were all comments addressed? No
Comments to applicant 02-03-2016 Email—with a request that applicant call
to review over the phone.
Resubmittal received by staff 04-25-16
Resubmittal reviewed by staff 05-31-16
Were all comments addressed?
Comments to applicant
Resubmittal received
Resubmittal reviewed
Approval letter sent 06/07/16 Email/mail
Applicant Survey Included?
ARB meeting date
ARB action
Short Review Comments Report for:
ARB201500115
SubApplication Type:
Shell - Signs
SIGN
Date Completed:10/02/2015
Reviewer:Brent Nelson ARB
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:Email from applicant indicating they will revise application in reponse to comments provided.
Division:
Date Completed:12/31/2015
Reviewer:Brent Nelson ARB
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:12/31/2015
Reviewer:Brent Nelson ARB
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:12/21/2015
Reviewer:Brent Nelson ARB
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:12-21-2015 ARB Meeting
ARB-2015-114 and ARB-2015-115: Shell Signs
The ARB viewed the proposed signs for the Shell stations, considered the shade and extent of the
red color that was proposed, and directed staff as follows:
1. Red 485 is acceptable as used in these signs.
2. Backgrounds of the panels in these signs shall be opaque.
3. The color of the framing elements in these freestanding signs shall be revised from white to
gray.
4. There appear to be several more colors in the freestanding sign panels than would typically
be approved. For example, note the red background, green background, two shades of yellow, and
multiple colors in the Kroger card. The total number of colors used shall be consistent with standard
practice.
5. Generally, for signs in the Entrance Corridors, red 485 may be acceptable on a case-by-case
basis as a secondary color.
Division:
Date Completed:09/25/2015
Reviewer:Brent Nelson ARB
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:02/03/2016
Reviewer:Brent Nelson ARB
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:02-03-15: Emailed comments to applicant with a request to call so we can discuss.
Division:
Date Completed:06/07/2016
Reviewer:Brent Nelson ARB
Review Status:Administrative Approval
Division:
Page: 1 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On: June 08, 2016
Reviews Comments:
Page: 2 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On: June 08, 2016
Brent Nelson
From: Margaret Maliszewski
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 12:40 PM
To: Brent Nelson
Subject: shell signs
Brent,
This is the ARB's action on the Shell signs:
a. ARB-2015-114 and ARB-2015-115:Shell Signs
The ARB viewed the proposed signs for the Shell stations, considered the shade and extent of the red color that was
proposed, and directed staff as follows:
1. Red 485 is acceptable as used in these signs.
2. Backgrounds of the panels in these signs shall be opaque.
3. The color of the framing elements in these freestanding signs shall be revised from white to gray.
4. There appear to be several more colors in the freestanding sign panels than would typically be approved. For
example, note the red background,green background,two shades of yellow,and multiple colors in the Kroger
card.The total number of colors used shall be consistent with standard practice.
5. Generally, for signs in the Entrance Corridors, red 485 may be acceptable on a case-by-case basis as a
secondary color.
I won't have time to contact the applicant before the holiday, and I want to talk with you about#3 and #4 before we
make contact again.
Let's chat as soon after Christmas as possible.
Margaret
Margaret M.Maliszewski,Principal Planner
Albemarle County Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,Charlottesville,VA 22902
434-296-5832 x3276
1
ware Nary
b. ARB-2015-114 and ARB-2015-115: Shell Signs
The ARB viewed the proposed signs for the Shell stations, considered the shade and extent of the red
color that was proposed, and directed staff as follows:
1. Red 485 is acceptable as used in these signs.
2. Backgrounds of the panels in these signs shall be opaque.
3. The color of the framing elements in these freestanding signs shall be revised from white to
gray.
4. There appear to be several more colors in the freestanding sign panels than would typically be
approved. For example, note the red background, green background, two shades of yellow,
and multiple colors in the Kroger card. The total number of colors used shall be consistent
with standard practice.
5. Generally, for signs in the Entrance Corridors, red 485 may be acceptable on a case-by-case
basis as a secondary color.
c. ARB-2015-67: CVS Equipment Screens
The ARB considered the revised design for the rooftop equipment screens and determined that the
drawings should include details with the following information:
1. Specify the metal.
2. Specify the type of paint/paint application process to ensure a good appearance long-term.
3. Add a detail(s)to further clarify the appearance of the panels.
Next ARB Meeting: January 4, 2016
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 1:42 p.m. to the next ARB meeting on Monday, January 4, 2016 in Room
241, Second Floor, County Office Building at 1:00 p.m.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD-PAGE 5
December 21,2015
FINAL ACTION MEMO