HomeMy WebLinkAboutWPO201500067 Review Comments 2015-09-18Short Review Comments Report for:
WPO201500067
SubApplication Type:
Whittington Phase B - Mitigation
Date Completed:09/14/2015
Reviewer:Justin Deel Engineering
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:1. Update the project number in the title to WPO201500067.
2. Please do not show the hatching legend from the source drawing. This adds confusion and is not
applicible to this plan. Also, notes on the source plan such as "Proposed Mitigation Area" are equally
as confusing.
3. Include the minimum survival required after two growing seasons, 600 plants/acre.
4. Is your sourch drawing an approved plan? Your proposed mitigation overlaps the proposed
mitigation on your source. Please clarify this.
Division:
Date Completed:09/18/2015
Reviewer:Justin Deel Engineering
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:10/07/2015
Reviewer:Justin Deel Engineering
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:Note that the parcel on the request to establish a bond (90-3) is incorrect. Remember this was an
offsite mitigation plan. Parcel 90-3 is the original project site, not the site of this mitigation plan.
The correct parcel is 56-53+.
I have informed the applicant of this error. They plan to resubmit the request. The bond estimate will
not change.
Division:
Date Completed:10/21/2015
Reviewer:Justin Deel Engineering
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:Project parcel confirmed. Notified Ana Kilmer, 10/21/2015.
Division:
Page: 1 of 1 County of Albemarle Printed On: June 10, 2016
Justin Deel
From: Justin Deel
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 1:42 PM
To: 'Dustin Greene'
Cc: 'Mike Myers'
Subject: Planning Application Review for WPO201500067 Whittington Phase B- Mitigation.
The Review for the following application has been completed:
Application Number= WP0201500067
Reviewer=Justin Deel
Review Status = Requested Changes
Completed Date =09/14/2015
1. Update the project number in the title to WP0201500067.
2. Please do not show the hatching legend from the source drawing. This adds confusion and is not applicible to
this plan. Also, notes on the source plan such as "Proposed Mitigation Area" are equally as confusing.
3. Include the minimum survival required after two growing seasons, 600 plants/acre.
4. Is your sourch drawing an approved plan? Your proposed mitigation overlaps the proposed mitigation on
your source. Please clarify this.
Justin Deel, EIT
Civil Engineer II
Department of Community Development
County of Albemarle,Virginia
434.296.5832 ext. 3565
1
Nee
Chapter 5.1-Buffer Establishment, Replacement and Restoration
- � � �` s e:�x
ikl•
rit4
+. :..:� .„Z
Greater than 1/4 acre of buffer
More than 10,890 square feet
A. Plant at the same rate as for '/acre or less.
B. The waterside 50%of the buffer(from the waterline inland for the first 50 feet):
For every 400 square-foot unit(20'x20')or fraction thereof plant:
one(1)canopy tree @ 1'/2"-2"caliper or large evergreen @ 6'
two(2)understory trees @ 3/"—1 'A"caliper or evergreen @ 4'
or one(1)understory tree and two(2)large shrubs @ 3'-4'
three(3)small shrubs or woody groundcover @ 15"—18"
AND
The landward 50%of buffer(from 50 feet inland to 100 feet inland):
either plant
Bare root seedlings or whips at 1,210 stems per acre',approximately 6'x6'on
center(Minimum survival required after two growing seasons:600 plants)
or
Container grown seedling tubes at 700 per acre approximately 8'x 8'on center
(Minimum survival required after two growing seasons:490 plants)
C. If the a► }avant.is willin to enter into a five year maintenance and performance guarantee:
r �3 0 p antedWi
Bare root seedlings or whips at 1,210 per acre,approximately 6'x 6'on center(Minimumt
survival required after two growing seasons: ts)
or
Container grown seedling tubes at 700 per acre approximately 8'x 8'on center(Minimum
survival required after two growing seasons:490 plants)
1 acre or more of buffer
With an evaluation from an arborist or forester or other professional,natural regeneration
may be an acceptable method of buffer establishment,however,a forestry management plan must
be in place prior to any vegetation being removed.A minimum of 35 feet next to the water must be
left in forest and protected prior to any vegetation being removed. If over 20 percent of the
vegetation must be removed for the health of the woodlot,within the 35 feet closest to the shore-
line,vegetation must be reestablished by seedling plantings at the rates above.
' Palone, Roxanne S.,and Al Todd, Chesapeake Baia riparian handbook:A guide for establishing and
maintaining riparian forest bi ffers. May 1977.p.7-20.
Riparian Buffers Guidance Manual
Page- 95
Justin Deel
From: Justin Deel
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 1:56 PM
To: 'Mike Myers'; 'Dustin Greene'
Subject: Planning Application Review for WPO201500067 Whittington Phase B-Mitigation.
The Review for the following application has been completed:
Application Number=WPO201500067
Reviewer=Justin Deel
Review Status =Approved
Completed Date = 09/18/2015