HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-12-08 ACTIONS
Board of Supervisors Meeting of December 8, 1999
December 10, 1999
AGENDA ITEM/ACTION
ASSIGNMENT
1. Call to order. Meeting was called to Order at 7:00 p.m., by the
Chairman. All BOS members present except Mr.
Marshall.
4. Others Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the Public. None.
· There were none.
6. SP-99-34. Free Bddge Auto Sales, Inc. (Sign #,50).
· APPROVED subject to the three conditions recommended by
the Planning Commission.
7. SP-99-58. 250 West Craft Barn (Signs g51&52).
· APPROVED subject to the seven conditions recommended by
the Planning Commission.
8. SP-99-60. Scottsville Rescue Squad (Signs #31&32).
· APPROVED subject to the seven conditions recommended by
the Planning Commission.
9. SP-99-66. Monticello High School (Sign #25).
· APPROVED subject to the three conditions recommended by
the Planning Commission.
10. ZMA-99-09. Westminster Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
(Sign ~53).
· APPROVED subject to recommendations of the Planning
Commission.
11.
ZMA-99-11. Clover Lawn Village (Sign #67).
REFERRED back to the Planning Commission with the
understanding that staff will look at the three parcels together
as a unified plan.
12. Appointments
· REAPPOINTED C. Jared Lowenstein to the Planning
Commission with said term to expire on December 31, 2001.
REAPPOINTED William W. Finely to the Planning Commission
as the White Hall representative, with said term to expire on
December 31, 2003.
Clerk: Set conditions out in action letter to
Planning.
Clerk: Set conditions out in action letter to
Planning.
Clerk: Set conditions out in action letter to
Planning.
Clerk: Set conditions out in action letter to
Planning.
Clerk: Set out in letter to Planning.
Clerk: Set out in letter to Planning.
Clerk: Send out reappointment letters and update
Boards and Commissions book.
Planning staff: Work with applicants.
Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
Board discussed the quality of the maps provided by
applicants. Asked staff to see what they can do.
Adjoum.
Meeting was adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
Attachment 1 - Planning actions
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and Community Development
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC
December 10, 1999
Board Actions of December 8, 1999
Attachment I
At its meeting on December 8, 1999, the Board of Supervisors took the following actions:
Agenda Item No. 6. SP-99-34. Free Brid.qe Auto Sales, Inc. (Sian ~50}. PUBLIC HEARING
on a request to allow auto sales & repair. Znd HC (pending approval of ZMA-99-08) & EC. TM78, P57B
& TM78E,PA, part thereof. Contains .9957 acs. Loc at 1400 Richmond Rd (Rt 250E), approx 3600' W of
State Farm Blvd. Rivanna Dist.
APPROVED subject to the following three conditions recommended by the Planning Commission:
1. Vehicles shall not be elevated;
2. Vehicles shall be displayed only in areas indicated for display shown on the site plan entitled "Free
Bddge Auto Sales Preliminary Site Plan," dated 5/3/99, with revisions dated 5/17/99; and
3. Use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness is issued by the ARB for the site plan,
including landscaping and lighting plans.
Agenda Item No. 7. SP-99-58. 250 West Craft Barn (Si.qns #51&52). PUBLIC HEARING on a
request to allow sales of handcrafted items. Znd RA. TM57, P81. Contains 2.963 acs. Loc on Rockfish
Gap Turnpike (Rt 250W), at inter w/Gillums Ridge Rd. Samuel Miller Dist.
APPROVED subject to the following six conditions recommended by the Planning Commission:
1. The 250 West Craft Barn shall be operated in accordance with the Application for Special Use Permit
and Attachment signed by Robert L. Leiby August 15, 1999, received by Susan Thomas October 28,
1999 and initialed "SEThomas 10/28/99, herein included as Attachment B;
2. No subdivision of the property shall occur without amendment of this Special Use Permit;
3. No food preparation shall take place on site in association with the craft sales use;
4. At the time of special seasonal events or when traffic warrants it, the applicants shall be responsible
for posting a sign indicating that overflow parking is available on Ivy Rose Lane. No parking is
permitted on Gillum's Ridge Road;
5. Architectural Review Board approval of new signage; and
6. The Craft Barn may be open not more than 24 days per year, but the Craft Barn may be open every
day if the owner installs a commercial entrance satisfying VDOT's "Minimum Standards of Entrances
to State Highways."
Agenda Item No. 8. SP-99-60. Scottsville Rescue Squad (Signs #31&32). PUBLIC HEARING
on a request to allow fundraising events in existing Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad bldg. This is an
amendment of an existing special use permit (SP-96-50). Znd PA. TM130, P7B. Site is approx 9.738
acs. Loc on Rt 6 (Irish Rd) at inter of Rt 6 & Rt 737 (Mountain Vista Rd). Scottsville Dist.
APPROVED subject to the following seven conditions recommended by the Planning
Commission:
1. Any fundraising activity shall be conducted in an enclosed building only;
2. Approval is limited to no more than one event per week either for fundraising purposes or rental for
events not associated with the rescue squad;
3. Any use of this building shall comply with any applicable requirements of Chapter 12, Article 2,
Division 1, of the County Code regarding dance halls;
4. Approval of expansion to the septic system to accommodate an event with 200 people for which food
and drinks can be sewed. No event will be held until the expansion is complete;
5. The applicant shall pave the parking area. No event will be held until the paving is complete.
6. No such activity shall be conducted between 11:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., except Fdday and Saturday,
for which no such activity shall be conducted between 12:00 midnight and 8:00 a.m.; and
7. Development shall be in general accord with the attached plan titled Scottsville Rescue Squad,
prepared by Robert Lum, revised 12/16/96 and initialed WDF 1/9/97.
Agenda Item No. 9. SP-99-66. Monticello High School {Sign #25). PUBLIC HEARING on a
request to allow temporary leasing for office usage. Znd R-15. TM91 ,P2. Monticello High School loc on
Mill Creek Dr (Rt 1150). Consists of 65.972 acs. Scottsville Dist.
APPROVED subject to the following three conditions recommended by the Planning Commission:
1. Professional office use shall occur when school is not in session and shall not exceed one pedod of
sixty (60) consecutive days annually. This sixty (60) day period shall include the pedods to set up the
professional office use and to restore the facilities to a school use;
2. Hours of operation for graders shall be from 6:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Athletic facilities may be used
until 9:00 p.m.; and
3. Graders (except local employees) shall be transported to and from the site by bus.
Agenda Item No. 10. ZMA-99-09. Westminster Canterbury of the Blue Rid_~e (Si;n #53).
PUBLIC HEARING on a request to amend existing PRD (ZMA 97-03) to allow for add'l independent prof
office bldgs along frontage of irt 250E. Site is on 7.65 ac portion of Westminster Canterbury znd PRD &
EC. TM78, Ps55A & 55A5. Loc on N side of Rt 250E, in front of Westminster Canterbury. (Loc in Urban
Area 3 of the Comprehensive Plan.) Rivanna Dist.
APPROVED subject to the following:
1. Special use permit approval for the retirement community (as distinguished from professional offices)
shall not expire but shall remain in effect so long as approval of ZMA 97-03 remains in effect. The
Application Plan shall be considered as conceptual only in terms of site layout of features such as
building footprint, building location, and road alignment. Approval shall be for uses and limitations as
specified in PROJECT DATA on the ZMA 97-03 Application plan. Setbacks from internal roads and
other vehicular areas shall maintain sight distances as determined by the Department of Engineering
and Public Works. Perimeter setbacks and yard requirements from abutting residentially zoned
properties shall not be less than required for such abutting properties.
2a. The structures intended to house the professional offices permitted under this special use permit shall
not exceed a total of 90,000 square feet, as further described below. The professional office use
within each intended structure, shall be valid for a padod not to exceed five (5) years from
commencement of construction of the office buildings;
b. 15,000 square feet of the 90,000 square feet of structures containing the professional office use(s)
shall be permitted to have uses unrelated to WCBR, provided that all such uses are contained within
the same physical structure;
c. Any of the remaining 75,000 square feet of structures may contain professional offices that are
not owned and/or operated by WCBR for the exclusive use of the residents in the PRD, if they consist
of uses that comply with the following: They shall be of a use type compatible with the services and
mission of WCBR as attached (Attachment J). These uses may be open to the general public and
community at large. Such uses shall include the provision of healthcare services and the
administrative and retail components appurtenant thereto, such as: (1) medical offices, outpatient
diagnostic and treatment centers (including outpatient imaging, same day surgery, oncology,
interventional radiology and outpatient laser procedures); dental and ophthalmic care; physical
therapy, rehabilitation and f~ness/wellness programs; community health; and (2) other Professional
Office Uses deemed to provide services to WCBR residents;
d. WCBR shall construct a physical linkage from its upper campus to the professional offices via a
paved golf cart path, at a width no smaller than the width of the existing WCBR cart paths, parallel to
and of similar slope to Pantops Mountain Road (or at another location on campus as approved by
Albemarle County Planning Staff) to provide connection between the WCBR campus and the
professional offices. The cart path must be approved with the first professional office building site plan
(after this permit is approved) and constructed before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the first
building shown on that plan;
e. WCBR shall operate a shuttle service, within the WCBR Planned Residential Development zoning
district, that is available to transport residents of the distdct to and from the professional offices on an
"On-call" basis dudng business hours of the professional offices; and
f. Professional office usage and structures referred to in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) shall be restricted
to Tax Map 78, Parcel 55A as depicted in Attachment A of this report. Minimum setbacks for building
and parking from Route 250 and external residential areas shall comply with Section 21.0 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
3. The wooded area on the Application Plan shown for passive recreation usage shall be maintained in
a natural state except for trail and related improvements as depicted generally on the Application
Plan. This area shall not be subject to general building development.
Access easements shall be provided to Tax Map 78, Parcel 55A5 (residue) and Tax Map 78, Parcel
55A1. WCBR will not be required to participate in construction of any such access. At time of
development of those properties, maintenance agreements as required by the pdvate roads
regulations of the Subdivision Ordinance shall be negotiated by the owners of Parcels 55A5, 55A1,
and WCBR (and the future heirs and assigns thereof),
Agenda Item No. 11. ZMA-99-11. Clover Lawn Villa_~e iSian ft67}. PUBLIC HEARING on a
request to rezone 2.65 acs from R-1 to R-6 to allow medium density residential development. TM56,
P107. Loc on Rockfish Gap Turnpike, Rt 250W, across the street from Blue Ridge Building Supply at
5221 Rockfish Gap Turnpike. (The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Neighborhood
Density Residential, recommended for 3-6 du/ac in the Village of Crozet.) White Hall Dist.
REFERRED back to the Planning Commission with the understanding that staff will look at the
three parcels together as a unified plan.
/ewc
James S. Gilmore, III
Governor
John Paul Woodley, Jr.
Secretary of Natural Resources
COMMONWEALTH o/VIRQINIA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Valley Regional Office
Street address: 4411 Early Road, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22801
Mailing address: P.O. Box 1129, Harrisonburg, VA 22801-1129
Telephone (540) 574-7800 Fax (540) 574-7878
http ://www.d eq. state, va. us
Dennis H. Treacy
Director
R. Bradley Chewning, P,E.
Valley Regional Director
November 22, 1999
Mr. Charles Martin
Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 Mclntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Re: Reissuance of VPDES Permit No. VA0083291, Crossroads Village Center STP
Dear Mr. Martin:
In accordance with the Code of Virginia, Section 62.1-44.15:01, I am enclosing a copy of
a public notice regarding the referenced proposed permit action. If you have any questions
regarding this proposed permit, please give me a call at (540) 574-7800.
Sincerely,
Janarxtalff .~. Paridey, P.E.
Environmental Engineer Senior
Enclosure
cc: Permit Processing File
PUBLIC NOTICE
REISSUANCE OF A VPDES PERMIT TO DISCHARGE TO STATE WATERS
AND STATE CERTIFICATION UNDER THE STATE WATER CONTROL LAW
First ~blic Notice Issue Date: (to be supplied by newspaper)
The State Water Control Board has under consideration the reissuance of the
following Permit and State Certificate:
Permit No.: VA0083291
Name of Permittee: North Garden Crossroad, Inc.
Facility Name: Crossroads Village Center STP
Facility Location: northeast corner of U.S. 29 and Rte. 692 intersection at
Crossroads, Albemarle County
Permittee Address: P.O. Box 149, North Garden, VA 22959
Discharge Description: Existing Municipal; Discharge Flow: 0.020 MGD; 10utfall.
Receiving Stream: South Branch N.F. Hardware River; Stream Mile:3.61
Basin: James (Middle); Subbasin: N/A; Section: 10; Class: III; Special Standards:
None.
This proposed permit action is tentative and consists of reissuing the
facility's existing VPDES Permit to discharge treated sewage wastewater. On the
basis of preliminary review and application of lawful standards and regulations,
the State Water Control Board proposes to reissue the permit subject to certain
conditions. The following parameters are limited: pH 6.0 min, 9.0 max; BOD5 45
mg/1 max; Suspended Solids 45 mg/1 max; Total Residual Chlorine 0.18 mg/1 max.
This permit will maintain the Water Quality Standards adopted by the Board.
'Sludge generated at this facility will be hauled by contractor to Rivanna Water
and Sewer Authority's Moores Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant for further
treatment-and disposal. - .....
Persons may comment in writing to the DEQ on the proposed permit action within 30
days from the date of the first notice. Only those comments received within this
period will be considered. Address comments to the contact person listed below.
Comments shall include the name, address, and telephone number of the writer, and
shall contain a complete, concise statement of the factual basis for comments.
Requests for a public hearing shall state the reason why a hearing is requested,
the nature of the issues proposed to be raised in the public hearing, and a brief
explanation of how the requester's interests would be directly and adversely
affected by the proposed permit action. The Director of the DEQ may decide to
hold a public hearing if public response is significant.
Ail pertinent information is on file and may be inspected or copied by contacting
Janardan R. Pandey at Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Valley
Regional Office, P.O. Box 1129, 4411 Early Road, Harrisonburg, VA 22801-1129,
Telephone No. (540) 574-7800.
Following the comment period, the Board will make a determination regarding
the proposed action. This determination will become effective, unless the
Director grants a public hearing. Due notice of any public hearing will be
given.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
September 1999 Financial Report
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
September 1999 Financial Report for the General, School,
and Capital Funds
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Ms. White, Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Walters
AGENDA DATE:
December 8, 1999
ACTION:
CONSENTAGENDA:
ITEM NUMBER:
INFORMATION:
ACTION: × INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY:~,~ U~
BACKGROU ND:
Attached are the September 30, 1999 Monthly Financial Reports for the General, School, and Capital Funds.
General Fund revenue projections were last revised as part of the 2000/2001 budget process.
General Fund expenditure projections have not been revised at this time.
Education revenue projections have not been revised at this time.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the September 1999 Financial Report.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
99.222
03C/> '-I Z G'3
~mo ~o ~,~ ~
_~ ':n m _"-'4 m 0 o m
~,'"o ~zz~
,.,., ~ , ,..,..,~. z ~ m ~ ,..;n > >m
O,c:~O omm~Z
m~:~a2.. ~--~ :-'4 -r z ~
~ ~= ~o r', ~--. ""zm zo~
z mm ,.4 ~"
uu~ m z;:U ~ _c 6b ~..~'-
m r-m W ~ Z
~0 ~ z < o
zO m m "u
~ ;:u m
m"r~
l= 8
ro'~ io~ o ll~ IOo co cr~ Ioo IC~ c~ ~o~ ~ c~ co ~o rn > c
~zz
L ~~ ~ ~ "oo ~rO
I0 I-~ ~ ~0
~z
00--~ 0001
000 0~0
C~ C~ CD C~ 4~.CD C~ C) C)
I.l~ Co I0 cO ~
'13
ITl
m
Z
-I
Z
CD
Z
0
Ill
Z
rtl
Z
Ill
IT!
Z
-!
m
BOARD OF SUPgg¥lg0g§
November l 9, 1999
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Departmem of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 - 5823
Fax (804) 972 - 4035
Katurah Roell
Virginia Land Co
195 Riverbend Drive
Charlottesville, VA 229t I
RE:
SP-99-34 Free Bridge Auto Sales
Tax Map 78 Parcel 57B and Tax map 78E, Parcel A, part of
Dear Mr. Roell:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on November 16, 1999, unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this
approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Vehicles shall not be elevated.
2. Vehicles shall be displayed only in areas indicated for display shown on the site plan entitled "Free Bridge
Auto Sales Preliminary Site Plan," dated 5/3/99, with revisions dated 5/17/99.
3. Use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness is issued by the ARB for the site plan,
including landscaping and lighting plans.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive
public comment at their meeting on December 8, 1999. Any new or additional information regarding
your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to
your scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
Margaret Pickart
Design Planner
MP/jcf
Cc: ~a Carey
~' Jack Kelsey
Amelia McCulley
Steve Allshouse
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
MARGARET M.M. PICKART
NOVEMBER 16, 1999
DECEMBER 8, 1999
SP-99-34 FREE BRIDGE AUTO SALES
Applicant's Proposal: The applicant proposes to amend SP 92-22 to increase the display parking area at the
existing Free Bridge Auto Sales site on the north side of Route 250 East. The applicant plans building and site
renovations in conjunction with the expanded display parking. A site plan delineating the proposed display
area is included as Attachment C.
Petition: Request foran amendment to Special Use Permit SP 92-22 to allow an increase in the area of display
parking in accordance with Section 30.6.3.2 of the Zoning Ordinance which allows for outdoor storage, display
and/or sale of automobiles in the Entrance Corridors. The property, described as Tax Map 78 Parcel 57B and
Tax Map 78E Parcel A, part thereof, contains .9957 acres and is located in the Rivanna Magisterial District
at 1400 Richmond Road (Route 250 East), approximately 3600 feet west of State Farm Boulevard. The
property is zoned HC Highway Commercial and EC Entrance Corridor. (See Attachments A and B for
location and tax maps.)
Character of the Area: The site is currently occupied by Free Bridge Auto Sales, Inc., with an existing
sales/repair building on site, as well as existing display parking. All adjacent properties are commercially
developed. The White House Motel is situated on the parcel to the east. The parcel to the west is occupied by
a restaurant. There are numerous retail and commercial services provided along Route 250 East. The
surrounding Pantops area is generally characterized by car delearships that include vehicles on display.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Ordinance Sections 31.2.4.1 and 30.6.3.2.b, and recommends approval of SP 99-34, subject to conditions.
Planning and Zoning History.:
November 1, 1999: ARB-P(SDP)-99-34: Free Brid~e Auto: The ARB expressed no objection to the special
use permit, with conditions, and provided preliminary comments on the proposed renovations for the benefit
of the applicant's final ARB submission. (See Attachment D.)
October 13, 1999: ZMA-99-08: White House Motel Conforming Use: The Board of Supervisors approved
a request to rezone 1.497 acres on the parcel (Tax Map 78E Parcel A, part thereof) adjacent to the Free Bridge
Auto site from R6 (Residential) to HC (Highway Commercial).
August 23, 1999: SDP-99-68: Free Bridge Auto Sales Preliminary_ Site Plan: Preliminary site plan submitted
for the expansion and renovation of Free Bridge Auto Sales. This site plan is currently under review by the
Site Review Committee.
September 24, 1999: SUB-99-205: White House Motel LLC Preliminary_ Plat: Plat approved to enlarge Tax
Map 78, Parcel 57 B by adding portions of Tax Map 78, Parcel 10 to accommodate the expansion of Free
Bridge Auto.
June 10, 1992:SP-1992-22: Dale Wilberger (Impact Auto): The Board of Supervisors approved a request for
outdoor storage and display of autos, trucks and trailers, consisting of used cars on the west side of the
property, one U-Haul van on the east end of the front lot, and additional U-Haul trucks at the rear of the
property.
April 20, 1992: ARB-P(SDP)-92-05: Impact Auto: The Architectural Review Board reviewed the plan
proposed in conjunction with SP-92-22 and granted staff administrative approval of a Certificate of
Appropriateness, with conditions related to landscaping, lighting, and U-Haul parking.
May 16, 1983: SDP-1983-25: Edgecomb Foreign Car Sales & Service: A minor site plan amendment was
approved for the addition of an office trailer.
March 1, 1974: Wilhoit Motors Used Cars: Original site plan for property approved.
Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Regional Service in Urban Area
Neighborhood 3 (Pantops). The proposed expanded use is compatible with the surrounding activities.
STAFF COMMENT:
Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance:
The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted
hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the
Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property,
It is anticipated that the expansion of vehicle rental and display will have no negative impact on the
surrounding uses or on the site itself, due to the existing use of the property and the existing development of
adjacent and nearby properties.
that the character of the district will not be chan~ed thereby,
It is not anticipated that the proposed use will change the character of the district, due to the commercial
activity on nearby properties, the general commercial character of the corridor, and the existing car dealerships
in the vicinity. The potential impact of the use on the character of the district has been addressed by the ARB.
The ARB has expressed no objection to the use, with conditions, based on the Entrance Corridor guidelines.
The conditions of ARB approval are incorporated into the recommended conditions of approval for this special
use permit.
and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance,
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the
EC Overlay District. With the incorporation of the recommendations of the ARB, this use would be in
.harmony with the purpose and intent of the EC district.
with the uses permitted by right in the district,
The proposed rental and display use will not restrict permitted uses on adjacent property. The proposed use
is similar to other uses permitted by right in this district. Automobile repair is a permitted use in the underlying
zoning district.
with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance,
There are no additional regulations in Section 5.0 specifically addressing the rental or display of vehicles.
and with the public health, safety and general welfare.
It is not anticipated that the proposed expansion of use will negatively impact the public health, safety, and/or
welfare.
SUMMARY:
This use is by special use permit due to the use of outdoor storage and display of vehicles in the Entrance
Corridor. The Architectural Review Board has reviewed the request. Their action, which is included as
Attachment D, expressed no objection to the proposed use, subject to conditions. Staff opinion is that the
expanded use will have minimal impact on the district, if the ARB's conditions are satisfied. Consequently,
staff finds that with the ARB's approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness, this use is consistent with the
intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, staff recommends approval of SP-99-
34 subject to conditions.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval of SP~99-34 subject to the following conditions:
1. Vehicles shall not be elevated.
2. Vehicles shall be displayed only in areas indicated for display shown on the site plan entitled "Free Bridge
Auto Sales Preliminary Site Plan," dated 5/3/99, with revisions dated 5/17/99.
3. Use shall not commence until a Certificate of Appropriateness is issued by the ARB for the site plan,
including landscaping and lighting plans.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Location Map
B - Tax Map
C - Site Plan Delineating Display Parking Area
D ~ Architectural Review Board Action Letter
A:\sp9934 free bridge auto.doc
A~UNTAIN
SUCK
MTN.
1631 --
)TTES-
5
I
Mills
Y
Stony ~
I
SP-99-34 Free Bridge Auto Sales, Inc.
I
,
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
ATTACHMENT B
SP-99-34 Free Brid
SECTION 78A
20M
MONTICEL LO ~"
"*~ '"" SOOTTSVILLE AND
......... ~ RIVANNA -DISTRICTS
i
48 -i
49
$cc
SECTION 78
rg
_ m
o .-n
IJ
,.
15 DISPLAY SPACES 8 ~J'2t5,4-~ ~- ~ ~
N35'12'OI"E 2~3.$9' .~'/
J
ITt
~ m~
· Z
--I
0
-(
m
Z
--I
ATTACHMENT E
PAGE 1
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 Mclntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 - 5823
Fax (804) 972- 4035
November 2, 1999
Katurah Roell
195 Riverbend Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
RE: ARB-P(SDP)-99-35 Free Bridge Auto, Tax Map 78, Parcel 57B
Dear Mr. Roell:
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board, at its meeting on November 1, 1999, completed a
preliminary review of the above-noted request to expand and remodel an auto sales and service building
on .996 acres, including outdoor display of vehicles. The following actions were taken.
The Board expressed no objection to the special use permit subject to the following conditions:
Vehicles shall not be elevated.
Vehicles shall be displayed only in the areas indicated for display shown on the:plan.
Approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness by the ARB, including landscape and
lighting plans.
The Board offered the following comments for the benefit of the applicant's final submission. Please
note that the following comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments
may be added or eliminated based on further review and changes to the plan.
1. Indicate on the plan which plantings, if any, will occur in above-~ound planters.
2. All planting in the VDOT right-of-way requires approval from VDOT. Planting along the
water quality swale should be coordinated with the Engineering Department.
3. Add shrubs along the east side of the she. Add shrubs along the west side of the site if they
can be coordinated with the water quality swale.
4. Show existing trees to be removed, particularly along the west side of the site.
5. Appropriate perimeter landscaping can reduce the need for interior parking lot trees from 7 to
4. It is recommended that the fourth tree be added behind the handicapped parking space.
The Small Dogwvood trees should be replaced with a different species at 2½" caliper.
ATTACHMENT D
PAGE 2
Page 2
November 2, 1999
6. Submit a complete lighting plan for review, including a photometric plan and cut sheets. It is
anticipated that existing nonconforming lighting will be removed. Please note that spillover
requirements apply to the EC side of the site, which will likely impact the locations of new
pole lights. All new lighting must be fully shielded and downward directed. Pole lights
should be of a height that is compatible with the scale of the development.
7. If approval of signage is requested concurrent with the Certificate of Appropriateness for the
site plan, provide complete information on signage, including material, size, illumination,
etc. The elevation should show the accurate size, color, and location of the proposed signage.
Please note that all signs will also require permits and approval from the Zoning Department.
8. Provide side elevations if they will be 6hanged.
9. Verify that the plant counts are correct in the landscape key.
10. Continue the brick facing across the full front of the building (the elevation facing the EC).
Provide revised elevations.
Your application for final ARB review may be made ar your earliest convenience. Revised drawings
addressing the comments listed above will be required. A submission and review schedule, an
application, and a checklist are attached for your convenience.
If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
Margaret Pickart
Design Planner
MP/jcf
Cc:
Free Bridge Auto Sales
Files: ARB
SP-99-34 Free Bridge Auto
Free Bridge Auto Preliminary Site Plan
November 19, 1999
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 - 5823
Fax (804) 972- 4035
Mary Ann Burk
5726 Ivy Rose Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22901
RE: SP-99-58 West Craft Barn, Tax Map 57, Parcel 81
Dear Ms. Burk:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on November 9, 1999, unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors, Please note that
this approval is subject to the following conditions:
The 250 West Craft Barn shall be operated in accordance with the Application for
Special Use Permit and Attachment signed by Robert L. Leiby August 15, 1999,
received by Susan Thomas October 28, 1999 and initialed "SEThomas 10/28/99,
herein included as Attachment B.
No subdivision of the property shall occur without amendment of this Special Use
Permit.
o
No food preparation shall take place on site in association with the craft sales use.
At the time of special seasonal events or when traffic warrants it, the applicants
shall be responsible for posting a sign indicating that overflow parking is available
on Ivy Rose Lane. No parking is permitted on Gillum's Ridge Road.
Architectural Review Board approval of new signage.
The Craft Barn may be open not more than 24 days per year, but the Craft Barn
may be open every day if the owner installs a commercial entrance satisfying
VDOT's "Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways."
Page 2
November 19, 1999
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and
receive public comment at their meeting on December 8, 1999. Any new or additional
information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
David B. Benish
Chief of Planning & Community Development
DBB/jcf
Cc:
Ella Carey
Jack Kelsey
Amelia McCulley
Steve Allshouse
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
SP 99-58 250 WEST CRAFT BARN
DAVID BENISH
NOVEMBER 9, 1999
DECEMBER 8, 1999
Applicant's Proposal:
The applicant's propose to resume sales of handcrafted and seasonal items at a location at the
comer of Route 250 West and Gillums Ridge Road which previously was used for the same
activity and known as Crafters Gallery. A location map is included as Attachment A.
Attachment B is the applicants' special use permit application.
Petition:
Request for special use permit to allow Sales of handcrafted items in accordance with Section
10.2.2.36 of the Zoning Ordinance which allows for gift, craft and antique shops by special use
permit in the Rural Areas. The property, described as Tax Map 57 Parcel 81, contains 2.963
acres, and is located in the Samuel Miller Magisterial District on Rockfish Gap Turnpike (Route
250 West) at the intersection with Gillums Ridge Road (Ronte 682). The property is zoned RA,
Rural Areas, and is designated Rural Area in the Comprehensive Plan, in Rural Area 3.'
Character of the Area:
Land use in the area is primarily agricultural and forestal to the north and east, with smaller
residential parcels located to the south and west. Several similarly sized parcels with (pre-
existing) commercial zoning are located within two miles of the site to the west, along Routes
250 and 240.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of sections 31.2.4.1 (criteria
for approval of special use permits), and recommends approval of SP 99-58 with conditions.
Planning and Zoning History:
The existing Crafters Gallery building is located on a parcel that also is the site of a private
residence belonging to the previous proprietor of the craft business. A special use permit was
approved for Crafters Gallery in 1974, with a condition (among others) that stated: "Permit to be
for 10 years with annual administrative approval." The business ceased operating approximately
around 1994. The County Attorney has determined that the authority to grant sPecial use permits
1
or to amend special use permit conditions is a legislative act and cannot be delegated to the
County's planning or zoning staff. Thus the "annual administrative approval" clause was void
from its inception, and the special use permit approval expired in 1984. For this reason, the
applicants Were required to reapply for approval, although their plan of operation appears to
comply with (or cause less impact than) the operating parameters of the previous business and
thus would have otherwise required no additional review by the County.
Comprehensive Plan:
This site is located in the Rural Area, on the south side of Route 250 West approximately 1/2
mile east of the junction of Routes 250 and 240, near the Mechums River. Route 250 West is an
entrance corridor. The applicants have stated that the barn dates from the 1800's, although staff
was unable to find evidence of the date of its construction in County records.
Chapter Two of the Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan (adopted March 3, 1999) sets forth:
OBJECTIVE: Continue to identify and recognize the value of buildings, structures, landscapes,
sites and districts which have historical, architectural, archaeological or cultural significance.
To the extent that the existing barn has become a formal or informal historic landmark along this
well-traveled and scenic corridor, its continued Occupancy may be expected to promote its
preservation. The fact that one of the proprietors of the new business is the owner and occupant
of the adjacent parcel to the west [house onthe hill], and owner of the barn also lives on the
property, there appears to be a strong inCentive for the old structure and surrounding gardens and
property to be well maintained and used as it was in the past.
STAFF COMMENT:
Once the special Use permit has been approved, the business may commence operations since no
site improvements are contemplated nor required.
Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use
permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance
may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of
substantial detriment to adiacent proper,O/,
As mentioned previously, there is one dwelling located on the same parcel as the barn, owned by
the proprietor of the former business. A second dwelling is located to the west up the hill, on the
adjacent parcel, which is owned and occupied by one of the applicants. Staff has visited the area
and is of the opinion that negative impacts on surrounding uses from the craft sales use will be
minimal. Staff was contacted by telephone by an area resident who stated her opinion that the
resumption of the previous use would be a positive activity for the area.
After meeting with representatives from Planning, Engineering and VDOT to discuss
transportation related improvements, the applicants downscaled their original application. They
are now proposing the following operating limits: the gallery is to be open 3 - 4 days per season
or for one planned event per season; if business is sufficiently strong, .any further operation of the
business would be limited to one weekend per month. The original application plan proposed the
same 3 - 4 days per season, but included the eventual possibility of daily operation should sales'
warrant it.
that the character of the district will not be chan~ed thereb¥~
The building is existing. Staff opinion is that the proposed use would be similar although less
active than the previous use and other craft shop uses in the Rural Area, and would provide
reasonable use of the existing building without changing the character of the district.
and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance~
Staff has reviewed the purpose and intent of thc ordinance as stated in Sections 1.4, 1 .$
and 1.6. Staff finds no conflict between the proposed use and these provisions of thc
ordinance.
with the uses permitted by right in the distriet~
The proposed craft business makes appropriate use of an existing building, and is similar in
character to other adaptive re-uses of old structures. The small size of the parent parcel (2.963
acres) and the coexistent residential use restrict further development of the site.
with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance~
Section 5.0 of the ordinance, Supplementary RegulationS, does not address this use.
and with the public health~ safe ,ty and general welfare
No adverse impact on the public health, safety and general welfare of the County has been
identified as a result of resumption of craft business activities
The existing barn is not served by a septic system (or a well), and under the Building Code,
neither is required for the craft sales use. Because of the absence of septic, the Building Code
3
and Zoning Services Department has recommended that no food preparation will be allowed in
association with the proposed business. The applicants are agreeable to this restriction.
The existing parking area on site exceeds required parking under the Zoning Ordinance. During
planned events, Zoning has recommended that a sign be posted at the entrance indicating that
overflow parking is available on Ivy Rose Lane, behind the residence on the parcel. No parking
will be allowed on Gillums Ridge Road. The applicants agree with. this recommendation.
Under the applicants' downscaled operating plan, VDOT representatives have indicated to staff
that the anticipated traffic impacts are sufficiently minimal to require no additional
improvements to the site. However, VDOT has identified additional improvements that would
be required for any level of activity exceeding the proposed 3 - 4 days/one planned event/one
weekend per season'schedule: a separation of 50 feet between the entrance and the intersection of
Routes 250 and 682; paving of that portion of the craft barn entrance lying within the Route 682
right-of-way; and, widening of the entrance to a 30-foot commercial standard. Because of the
topography and the location of the barn and residence on the site, the applicants felt they would
be unable to construct and/or afford these improvements and thus scaled their original
application down to the present plan. (See Attachment C, Engineering comments)
SUMMARY:
Resume~l operation of the former craft sales business is an appropriate activity for this existing
site and structure in the RA district. No site plan will be required because current site
improvements are adequate to operate the business in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval of SP 99-58 subject to the following conditions:
Recommended Conditions of Approval:
The 250 West Craft Barn shall be operated in accordance with the Application for
Special Use Permit and Attachment signed by Robert L. Leiby August 15, 1999,
received by Susan Thomas October 28, 1999 and initialed "SEThomas 10/28/99,
herein included as Attachment B.
No subdivision of the property shall occur without amendment of this Special Use
Permit..
3. No food preparation shall take place on site in association with the craft sales use.
4. At the time of special seasonal events or when traffic warrants it, the applicants
shall be responsible for posting a sign indicating that overflow parking is available
on Ivy Rose Lane. No parking is permitted on Gillum's Ridge Road.
· 5'. Architectural Review Board app.roval of new signage.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Location Map
B - Application
C - Engineering Comments
J
ALBEMARLE
COUNTY
69
6O
~x ?0
~OA
¥?
TSA
56
$S
ME(~HU~
4~C
41
46
52C
43A{I)
41'
73
SAMUEL MILLER AND
WHITE HALL
4,8
SECTION 57 .
gLi_,
County of Alb"' mrle. ':' Department of Bt .... !lng Code an_d__Zoni.__ng Service!
Application for Spemal Use Penm
'Zonln~ Dis~ct _ ~ ' *~nino Orginsflcc Section numl)er
('/tall ~11 assii~ you with ~ items)
Number of ~cru to bc coverGd by Spe~al T ~se Permit cst. ~,Uo. i~ ~L ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ F~t)_
ibis an amendment to an cxisgng Special Uae Permit?
Arc you submitting a ~ite development plan wiO~ this app]icaUon?~~ ~/&~,.0 Yegg
Xax map and parcel ~~7 ~'L~{ , rhysicalAddrcsscir~si~n,d~~~ ~
thc owner of this propnrty o~n (or have uny ownership interest in) any abutting property? lrycs, plea. Ii:
[dio~etax mapandparcclnumb:rs ~0
~ L~tl~,' of AuthoriZatio~
401 ~clndre Road -:- Charlott~vlll~, VA ~2902 -:' Voice: 296~'2 ':' Fax: 972-4126
lo.',~?,'g~ 13::ts FAX 1t724 D£PT OF PL.~I~ ~0~
Section 31.2.4.1 of the Albcm~le County Zoning O~in~cc s~a~es thaL "The bo~d of supe~isors
hereby rcse~ unto i~lf the ~gh[ :o issue all s~ci~ use pcr~z~is ~rn~ted hereunder. Spatial use
pernuts for uses a~ provided in this ordinance may be issued u~n a finding by ~ bo~d of sup=~iso~
that such use w~]l not b~ of substantia] &triment ~o ~djac~nt pro~rty, that the character of the district
will not be chnngcd :hereby and ~la: such usc will be in harmony wifl~ thc purpose and intent of this
ordinate, with ~c uses p~l~ed by right in thc district, with addi~onal t'cguladons provided in section
~.0 o~ :~s ordinance, and with the pubEc health, s~ety m~d geQera] welf~e
The items which follow will be reviewed by the. staff in their analysis of your request. Please complete
efts form and provide additional informal/on wMch will assist the County in its review of your request.
If you need assistance filling out these items, staff is available.
What is the Comprchcnsivc Ph:n designation for this prope~'ty? I'~ fl'~ '~ 0 ,,"<3,1 _/t~.~ ~
2 How will thcproposcdspcc{al use affectadjaccn~ prope, rty?. _T'~..~,,.,¢ ~,~; tJ
,~. How ~ill ~c propEsed s~cJal use affect thc cheater of thc district sutro~ndlng
~ ~ow is ~he use Jn barony wi{h Lhc pu~osc and intent OftheZoni~ Ordinance?
c , Oc
What additional regulations prool~ed in Section 3.0 of the Zoning Ordinance app~yto ~i~ Use~ ~ ~ ~ ~
...... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2
Describe your'reques~ in dctall an~ inClUde ~i Peffinent information such as thc numbers of persons
involved in the use, operating hours, and any unique features of the use: .~-
ATrAC}IM.ENTS REQUIRED -pro, ide two(2) copies of each:
Recorded plat or boundary survey of the property requested for the rezoning. If there is
no recorded plat or boundary survey, please provide legal description of ~¢ ¢roper~y and
the Deed Book and page number or Plat Book and page number.
Note: If you arc toque,ting a ~pecial USe permit only for a portion of the property, it
needs to be described or delineated on a copy of the plat or surveyed drawing.
Ownership information - If ownership ot' the property is in the name of any type of legal
entity or organization including,.hut not limited to, thc name of a corpora~on, partnership
or assooiation, or in th~ name of a trust, or in a fictitious name, a document acceptable to
cbc County must be submitted certifying [hat the person signing below has the authority
to do so.
If the applicant ~s a con,act purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be
submitted containing the owner's written consent to ihe application,
If the applicant is the agent of tl~e owner, a document acceptable to the County must be
submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency.
OPTIONAL ATTACHMENTS:
Drawings or conceptual plans, il' any.
Additional Information. if any.
I hereby certify that I own the subject property, or have the lcgat power to act on behalf of the owner in
filing this application. I aho certify that the information provided i$ true and accurate to th~ b~st of my
lcnowledge.
Date ' ~ .......
Printed N~ me Daytime phone numbcr or S~guatory
This space will be used to sell handcrafted pieces of'work. A range of'items will be
teaturCd:
Pottc~j
· Iron Work
Glass
Wood
Old Furnitt, re
G-ardcn Acccssorics
Fabric Goods
Paper Goods
Framed Pieces
Herbal and Floral Products.
Seasunal accents of plants, soaps, and architectural items will also be included for sale,
and used as display accents to hold invcntory.
Our int'entio,~ is to be open three to four days pet' season (or event planned). If we feel
the public's response is positive to our seasonal showings, any further openings would
not exceed the time limitation of one weekend per month.
We hopc this time limitation will comply with VDOT's, the Planning Department's, and
the lIealth Department's wishes.
Sincerely,
Janice Arone
Mary Am~ Burk
Byron Burk
CC'
Susan Thomas
JeflYey Thomas
R, obcrt BaH
Jan Sprinkle
Don HaCkler, art'n: Michelle Napper
Jeff Thomas
I ATTACHMENT C I
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jeff Thomas
Friday, October 29, 1999 2:23 PM
Susan Thomas
250 West Craft Barn On-Site Meeting
Susan~
As you requested this morning, I am writing this e-mail to summarize for you our on-site meeting last Friday, October 22,
1999. The operators of the proposed craft store, Mary Ann Burk and Janice Arone, met us at the site. The government
attendees were you, Bob Ball of VDOT, and myself. I have summarized the two major issues that were discussed below. -
First, the location of the existing entrance to the craft barn was less than the 50 foot minimum distance from the right turn
lane of US 250. The minimum distance is required by VDOT's Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways, page
19. Ms. Burk and Ms. Arone did not at first understand why the entrance was non-standard. Mr. Ball stated that he did not
kn owthe reason why the entrance was allowed to exist when Route 682 was relocated and improved. I suggested
possibly constructing a standard commercial entrance (30 foot wide with 12.5 foot radii) further south along SR 682 to
achieve the desired 50 foot setback from US 250. Bob and I marked off a location for this proposed driveway with orange
spray paint. Ms. Burk and Ms. Arone stated that they didn't have the money for a new entrance and that such a
requirement would most likely "kill" their business venture. They further explained that the craft barn was a supplemental
means of income for them and that they intended to be open three to four days per season (usually on the weekends).
You suggested that they could revise their special use permit form to reflect their limited hours of operation. Mr. Ball said
he would meet with Mr. Bill Mills and find out if VDOT could waive both the 50 foot setback and the commercial entrance
standard for a limited operation business. It was agreed by all parties that the standard VDOT commercial entrance was
probably excessive for a small business like the craft barn.
The next issue was the recommendation from VDOT that the parking area for the barn be paved with asphalt. It is
currently a grovel surface. Mr. Ball said he made the recommendation to limit the amount of gravel that collects at the
driveway and is carried to the intersection of US 250 and SR 682. He explained that the gravel could present a hazard for
motorists trying to stop at the intersection'during wet weather. I told Mr. Ball that Section 18-4.12.6.3 of the County Code
states that the County cannot require asphalt parking lot pavement unless the anticipated traffic exceeds 350 vehicle trips
per week. With the limited hours of operation, it is unlikely that this will be exceeded. You added that a paved parking lot
would also not blend with the rural character of the area. I stated that the Engineering Department would support a VDOT
requirement for asphalt paving to the SR 682 right-of-way. This would help minimize the gravel transport and still be cost
effective for Ms. Burk and Ms. Arone.
You informed me this morning that Mr. Ball spoke with you and stated that Mr. Mills decided to waive the commercial
entrance standard and the 50 foot setback. The Engineering Department supports this decision. It is still unclear if VDOT
will still require paving to the right-of-way. This should be verified before the Planning Commission meeting. We
recommend paving of the driveway to the right-of-way line. You also sent a copy of the revise special use permit
application in which Ms. Burk and Ms. Arone stated that "any further openings would not exceed the time limitation of one
weekend per month.
If you have any further questions or comments, please contact me.
Thanks,
Jeff Thomas
Senior Engineer
November 19, 1999
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 Mclntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 - 5823
Fax (804) 972 - 4035
Kevin Quick
Rt. 1, Box 962
Scottsville, VA 24590
RE: SP-99-60 Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad, Tax Map 130., Parcel 7B
Dear Mr. Quick:
The Albemarle County, Planning Commission, at its meeting on November 16, 1999, unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors.
Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Any fundraising activity shall be conducted in an enclosed building only.
Approval is limited to no more than one event per week either for fundraising purposes or rental
for events not associated with the rescue squad.
Any use of this building shall comply with any applicable requirements of Chapter 12, Article 2,
Division 1, of the County Code regarding dance halls.
Approval of expansion to the septic system to accommodate an event with 200 people for which
food and drinks can be served. No event will be held until the expansion is complete.
The applicant shall pave the parking area. No event will be held until the paving is complete.
No such activity shall be conducted between 11:00 p.m and 8:00 a.m., except Friday and
Saturday, for which no such activity shall be conducted between 12:00 midnight and 8:00 a.m..
Development shall be in general accord with the attached plan titled Scottsville Rescue Squad,
prepared by Robert Lum, revised 12/16/96 and initialed WDF 1/9/97.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive
public comment, at their meeting on December 8, 1999. Any new or additional information regarding
your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to
your scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or.comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Transportation Planner
Cc: Ella Carey
Jack Kelsey
Amelia McCulley
Steve Allshouse
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
SP 99-60 Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad
SUBJECTIPROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad Special Use
Permit
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Cilimberg, Benish, Wade
AGENDA DATE:
November 16, 1999
ACTION:
X
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Yes
REVIEWED BY:
ITEM NUMBER:
INFORMATION:
INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on January 13, 1999, unanimously approved the
above-noted request to allow for fundraising events, such as raffles, auctions, community functions, dances
etc., in the existing Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad building. It was approved with eight conditions (see
Attachment A, Original Staff report). Condition #8 stated, "Special use permit shall expire one year from it,,
approval date unless extended prior to its expiration by the Board of Supervisors. (Please note that in order t¢
receive approval for extension of this Special Use Permit within one year, application for extension must b(
Submitted to the County no later than September 20, 1999. This will allow the extension public hearing to bE
scheduled with the Board of Supervisors on January 12, 2000. The fee for an extension request is $55.00)."
DISCUSSION:
The Board of Supervisors included this condition to address the concerns expressed at the public hearin[
about increased noise and traffic. The" trial" year would give the community and the County and opportunit,.
to assess the impacts reflected in these concerns. Staff has checked with the Police Department and ther,
have been no calls regarding any activity at 805 Irish Road (the address of the Rescue Squad).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the approval of SP 99-60, Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad with'the following condition,~
deleting condition #8 from the original approval:
1. Any fundraising activity shall be conducted in an enclosed building only.
2. Approval is'limited to no more than one event per week either for fundraising purposes or rental for
events not associated with the rescue squad.
3. Any use of this building shall comply with any applicable requirements of Chapter 12, Article 2, Divisior
1, of the County Code regal:ding dance halls.
4. Approval of expansion to the septic system to accommodate an event with 200 people for which food
and drinks can be served. No event will be held until the expansion is complete.
5. The applicant shall pave the parking area. No event will be held until the paving is complete.
6. No such activity shall be conducted between 11-:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., except Friday and Saturday, f¢
which no such activity shall be conducted between 12:00 midnight and 8:00 a.m..
7. Development shall be in general accord with the attached plan titled Scottsville Rescue Squad,
prepared by Robert Lum, revised 12/16/96 and initialed WDF 1/9/97.
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
JUANDIEGO WADE
DECEMBER 15,1998
JANUARY 13, 1999
SP 98-56 SCOTTSVILLE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD
Applicant's Proposal:
The applicant is proposing to amend SP 96-50 to allow for fundraising events, such as,
raffles, auctions, community functions, dances, etc., in the existing Scottsville Volunteer
Rescue Squad building.
Petition:
Proposal to amend an existing Special Use Permit (SP 96-50) to allow fundraising
events in the existing Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad building (Attachment A) The
site is 9.738 acres Zoned RA, Rural Areas. This property, described as Tax Map 130
Parcel 7B, is located on Route 6 (Irish Road) at the intersection of Route 6 and 737
(Mountain Vista Road) in the Scottsville Magisterial District (Attachments B & C). The
property is not in a designated Development Area of the Comprehensive Plan.
Character of the Area:
This site fronts on Route 6 and Route 737, which is a gravel road. Several dwellings are
located on the east side of Route 737 near this site. The predominant land use in the area
is agriculture/pasture and rural residential.
RECOMMENDATIION: Staff recommends approval with conditions of the requested
amendment to SP 96-50.
Planning and Zoning History:
SP 96-50 for Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad was approved by the Board of
Supervisors on February 19, 1997 for construction of a rescue squad station. The
approval, however, was subject to the condition that "subordinate uses and fund raising
activities such as, but not limited to, bingo, raffles and auctions shall require amendment
of this special use permit." (Attachment D)
Comprehensive Plan:
This area is located in the Rural Areas of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive
Plan does not contain any comment regarding this type of activity (fund raising events in
community facilities)'.
STAFF COMMENT:
Staffwill address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special
use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this
ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use
will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property.
Staff has visited the site and is of the opinion that impact on the surrounding uses will
primarily be from increased traffic during these events. Staff estimates that during a
worst case scenario week the site will generate approximately 400 vehicles trips per
week. This includes the one mai or event each week, the general membership meeting, the
board of directors meeting, and the daily day and night shift staff. Access to the site is
from Route 6 with no entrance onto Route 737. The request will increase the number of
vehicle trips to over 350 vehicle trips per week. The County Zoning Ordinance requires
the parking area to be paved if the vehicle trips per week exceeds 350. Staff has not
viewed this impact as a substantial detriment as the impact is infrequent.
that the character of the district will not be changed thereby,
This request is for allowance of an activity in an existing building. The addition of paved
parking may have a minor impact to the character of the area. Staff will require
screening as part of the additional parking area.
and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this
ordinance,
Staff has reviewed the purpose and intent of the ordinance as stated in Sections 1.4, 1.5,
and 1.6. Staff finds no conflict with these provisions of the ordinance.
with the uses permitted by right in the district,
This use will not restrict permitted uses on any adjacent property.
with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance,
Section 5.1.09b of the ordinance contains additional regulations for this type of use
(Attachment E). Staff has included conditions which will make this use consistent with
these additional regulations. Volunteer fire, rescue, and ambulance organizations are
permitted by County Ordinance to conduct fund raising activities such as bingo, raffles,
and auctions in'an enclosed building. Should the Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squad rent
out this facility to other than a recognized non-profit organization, it would have to apply
for a special use permit to can'y out such events.
and with the public health, safety and general welfare. -
Initially the Health department has limited the number of people per event to 100 with no
food or beverage served due to existing sewer capacity. Staff's primary concerns with
this request has been the ability of the septic system to sustain special events with
attendance over 100. Staff met with the applicant and an official from the Health
Department. The applicant agreed to upgrade the septic system to accommodate a 200
person event where food and drinks can be served. This can be done without expanding
the drain field. Staff feels this addresses there concerns regarding the capacity noted in
the Health Department comments (see attachment F).VDOT's comments can be found
on Attachment G.
SUMMARY:
Staff has identified the following factor(s) which is favorable to this request:
1. This request will allow the Scottsville Voluntary Rescue Squad an additional means to
raise money to repay construction loans and for other operational purposes.
Staff has identified the following factor(s) which is unfavorable to this request:
1. This request has the potential to generate increased traffic volume during events,
however, Route 6 is a primary road adequate to accommodate the increased traffic.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval of this request subject to the following conditions:
2.
3.
4.
Any fundraising activity shall be conducted in an enclosed building only.
Approval is limited to no more than one event per week either for fundraising
purposes or rental for events not associated with the rescue squad.
Any use of this building shall comply with any applicable requirements of
Chapter 12, Article 2, Division 1, of the County Code regarding dance halls.
Approval of expansion to the septic system to accommodate an event with 200
people for which food and drinks can be served. No event will be held until the
expansion is complete.
The applicant shall pave the parking area. No event will be held until the paving
is complete.
No such activity shall be conducted between 11:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., except
Friday and Saturday, for which no such activity shall be conducted between 12:00
midnight and 8:00 a.m..
Development shall be in general accord with the attached plan titled Scottsville
Rescue Squad, prepared by Robert Lum, revised 12/16/96 and initialed WDF
1/9/97.
Special use permit shall expire one year from its approval date unless extended
prior to its expiration by the Board of Supervisors. (Please note that in order to
receive approval for extension of this Special Use Permit within one year,
application for extension must be submitted to the County no later than September
20, 1999. This will allow the extension public hearing to be scheduled with the
Board of Supervisors on January 12, 2000. The fee for an extension request is
$55.00).
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Applicant's Application
B. Location Map
C. Tax Map
D. SP 96-50 Approval Letter
E. Section 5.1.09b of Zoning Ordinance
~F..Health Department Comments
G. VDOT Comments
A:\sp9856 scottsville rescue report2.doc
4
County of Albemarle -:o Department of Building Co( ~nd ATTACHMENT A
OFI~I~2E USE ONLY
Application for Special Use Permit
~ *Existing Use f"~.tgU~.o,~., 'c"~w~a~ Proposed Use f'~SCO& ~O&~
*Zo~ng Dis~cr ~ ~, { ~ *Zo~ng Ordnance Sec~on number reqummd
(*s~ff will ~sist you wi~ th~ items~
} Number of a~es to be covered by Speci~ Use Pe~it .~. ~ it ~ ~ ~. o~ ~m, ~. ~ ~ g ~ ~
~ ~ an amendment to an effisfing Special Use Per, t? ~Y~ No
Are you rebating a si~ development plan ~th ~ appHofion? ~ Ye~o
Contact Person (Whom s~ould we call/write concerning this pro, ect?~:
.Address ~---~ ~d. {"~ ~7_..I
Daytime Phone ( ) ~-'~5"~ -
zip 'Z,.4 ¢~0i
Owner of land (~a listed in the County's records):
lAddress (> 0 ~:~' "~3
Daytime Phone ( ) g. ~'/o - ~ ~
Fax # -- E-mail --'
zip 244~0
, Applicant CWho is me contact ~r~on represenung ? Who is requesting ~e spec,al use?):
[Address City
!Daytime Phone ( ~ ) Fax #
E-mail
State , ,, Zip
Tax map and parcel
Location of~roperty danamarks, intersecuons., or otherl
Physical Address (if=signed}
I Does the owner of mis property own ('or have any ownership interest in) any abutting property? If yes, please list
! those tax map and parcel numbers t-Jo
OFFICE USE ONLY
Fee amount S C~_ ¢ Date Paid
/ !
Receipt
~1ZMA$ and Pr~f~m:
~ Vm~ccs:
2 ~tter of
Conceal mvi,w of Site Development Pl~? ~ Yes ~ No
401 McIntire Road ':' Charlottesville, 'vA 22902 -:- Voice: 296-5832 4- Fax: 972.4.126
Section 31.2.4.1 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance states that, 'q'he board of supervisors
hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted hereunder. Special use
permits for uses as provided in tiffs ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the board of supervisors
that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, that the character of the district
will not be changed thereby and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this
ordinance, with the uses permitted by right in the district, with additional regulations provided in section
5.0 of this ordinance, and with the public health, safety and general welfare.
The items which follow will be reviewed by the staff in their analysis of your request. Please complete
this form and provide additional information which will assist the County in its review of your request.
If you need assistance filling out these items, staff is available.
What is the Comprehensive Plan designation for this property?
How will the proposed special use affect adjacent property?
How will the proposed special use affect the character of the district surrounding the property?
How is the use in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district?
What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of the Zoning Ordinance apply to this use?.
How will this use promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of thc community?
2
Describe your request in detail and: ":de all pertinent information such as
involved in the use, operating hours, and any unique features oft. he use:
numbers of persons
ATTACI~vlENTS REQUIRED - provide two(2) cop/es of each:
Recorded plat or boundary survey of [he propert? requested for the rezoning, if [he.m is
no recorded plat or boundary survey, please provide legal description of the prope~- and
the Deed Book and page number or Plat Book and page number.
Note: If you are requesting a special use permit only for a portion of the properry, it
needs to be described or delineated on a copy of the plat or surveyed drawing.
Ownership information - If ownership of the property is in the nme of any type oflegaI
entity, or organization including, but not limited to, the name of a corpomtiom parmership
or association, or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious name, a document acceptable to
the County must be submitted certifying that the person sigmng below has the authority
to do so.
If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be
submitted containing the owner's written consent to the application.
If the applicant is 'the agent of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be
submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency.
OPTIONAL ATTACI-~ME?,rI'S:
Drawings or conceptual plans, if any.
Additional Information, if an),.
I hereby certify, that I own the subject property., or have the legal power to act on behalf of [he owner in
filing this application. I also certify that the information provided is true and accurate to the best ef mv
knowledge.
~ Sa,:.
Signature
Printed ~ame
Date
Daytime phone number of Signatory
3
98-56
$co'd~vllle Volunteer
N G ~ A
K ~
ro
011LL'A~YN
ATTACHMENT B
. o~
ALBEM ~,LE COUNTY
/
,1"
'% Sp 98-56
~- $¢ottsville Volunteer ~, '~
Rescue Sa~d -
- ~ a. ~ ..
/ : -
-.~ ~~
.'
,~ -;'~ _ ,_ SCOTTSVILLE DISTRICT SECTION
_A_ TTACHMENT C
150
ATTACHMENT D
Dept.
COUNTY OF ALBF_MARLE
of Planning & Communi~ Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(8O4) 296-5823
,.bruary 26, 1997
;RS, Inc
FTN: D. L. Bonnet
3 Box 33
ortsville, VA 24590
SP-96-50 SVRS, [nc, Tax Map 130, Parcel 7
:ar Mr. Bonner:
e Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on February, 19, 1997, by a vote of 6-0, approved the above-
:ed request, for construction ora rescue squad station. Please note that this approval is subject to the following
~ditions:
Development shall be in general accord witl~ the attached plan titled Scottsville Rescue Squad,
prepared by Robert Lum, revised I2/16/96 and initialed WDF 1/9/97. The plan may be revised
to address comments Site Review Committee and shall be revised to provide an entrance Iocated
on Route 6 only (copy attached).
Subordinate uses and fund raising activities such as, but not limited to, bingo, raffles and
auctions shall require amer~dment of this special use permit.
he event that the use, structure or activity for which this special use permit is issued shall not be commenced within
.~teen (18) months after the issuance of such permit, the same shall be deemed abandoned and the authority granted
:eunder shall thereupon terminate. For purposes of this section, the term "commenced" shall be construed to include
commencement of' construction of any structure necessary to the use of such perm it with in two (2) years from the
.' of the issuance thereof which is thereafter completed within one (I) year.
ore beginning this use, you must obtain a zoning clearance from the Zoning Department. Before the Zoning
)artment will issue a clearance, you must comply with the conditions in this letter. For further information, please call
Sprinkle at 296-5875.
should have any questions or comments regarding the above-noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
;erety, · ~
ct~r o~ Planning &(Comm.,~ty Development
Amelia McCulley Jack Kelsey
ATTACHMENT E
5.1.o9 FIRE. A,~IBULANCE. RESCUE SQUAD STATION (VOLUNTEER)
a. Any such use seeking public funding shall be reviewed by the comm~sslon in accord~'~ce w)t~
section 31.2.~. SFecifically. me commission shall find mat the proaosed service area zs hoc
already adequately served )~,< ~other s~c~ ~raciiJry. In addition, the commxssion shall
consider: _,m'owth potential {"or the area: relationship to centers or'population and ,'o
property, concenn'ations: and access m and adequacy or' public roads in the area ~'or such
The commission may reques~ recommertda~ton fram the .-kJbem-~rie Count'}.' t~r~ or't~cta[
other approprmte a~encies in /ts review:
Such subordinate uses and t'und-raising ac=ivities as bingo, raffles and auc:ions shall be
conducted in an enclosed building only. Noise ~ener'ated from such activ~t3.' shah not exc~,-d
~brt'y (,,,tO} decibeis a~ the nearest agrmuit'aral or residential propert3.' line. No such activ~t3.'
shall be con~uc:sd be~veen I [:00 p.m. and ~:00 a.m.
Dooperation with the
:e Department of Health
ce of Environmental Health
)ne (804) 972-6259
; (804) 972-4310
ATTACHMENT F
h,~..~..~ g ~ ?
C'OMMON'VEALTH of ViRQINIAP!anni c
Thorne: Jefferson Heakh District
1138 Rose Hill Drive
P. O. Box 7546
Charlottesville, Virc~inia 22906
rLUVANNA COUNTY fPALMV~At
GREENE COUNTY (STANAROSVILLE~
LOUISA COUNTY (LOUISA:
NELSON COUNTY (LCVINGSTGNi
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Date:
Kay Harden, Scottsville Rescue Squad
Juandiago Wade, Planning Dept.
Bill Craun, EHS Sr.
Dwayne Roadcap, Technical Consul~
November 16, 1998
Re:
Special Use Permit application for SVFD, Inc.
The sewage disposal system is the limiting factor in determining what
applications can be allowed for the facility under the new proposed uses. The
maximum design capacity of the system is 750 GPD with an average daily-
anticipated flow of 500 GPD. Speaking with Kay Harden, the facility has three
bedrooms with three beds per room. On any given .week, the maximum use of
the facility would involve use of the laundry facilities (one machine), a fundraising
event, a squad meeting and a soci~l'-~vent.
The laundry facilitiL, s would only be utilized for linen service with no personal use
from volunteers or others. The squad meeting would hold a maximum of 80
persons on a Tuesday with no meals served. Fundraising events would have a
potential of 200 persons with meals and beverages being served. Social events
such as weddings, conferences or banquets would again be used for 200
persons with food and beverages being prepared on-site. Fundraising and social
events would last no more than four hours.
Design flows for an event where food and beverage is served is 10 to 50 gallons
per person. Design flows for events with no food and beverage being served
would be three gallons per person. Thus, the design flow for the staff meeting on
Tuesdays would be 240 gallons (80 persons X 3 gallons per person) while the
fuhdraising and social events would be a minimum of 2,000 GPD (200 persons X
10 gallons per person). A design flow of 75 gallons per person or 150 gallons
per bedroom is normally considered. Thus, a total of 450 gallons per day for
three bedrooms with two persons occupying each bedroom can be considered
for the facility. The design of the bedrooms would increase to 67'5 gallons/day if
three persons occupied each bedroom.
All of these numbers indicate that the sewage disposal system is not
designed sufficiently for the new anticipated uses of the rescue squad. In
order to allow fundraising and social events on the weekends, additions to the
existing sewage disposal system are necessary.
Daily Desi,qn Flow: $cctts'¢]#e Rescue Squad
Monday t Tuesday I Wednesday I Thursday I Friday t Saturday f Sunday
450GPD 1890GPD 1450GPD 1450GPD 12,450GPD 12,450GPD 1450GPD
Tuesday has a higher design flow considering the squad meeting of 80 persons.
Friday takes into account a fundraising event of 200 persons where food and
beverage is served and use of the three bedroom living quarters. Similarly,
Saturday considers a social event where food and beverage's served. All other
days show design flows for three bedroom (six persons) living quarters at the
rescue squad with laundry facilities.
Under the current permit capacity, a maximum of 100 persons per
fundraising or social event could be allowed'with no food or beverage
service. Ar~v enhanced usage beyond this capacity Would require upgrades to
the sewage disposal system.
Please keep in mind that there is significant difference between design flows
from any facility and the actual flows associated with it. The use of safety factors
is common place in all aspects of en_gineering and it would be unwise to design a
system for the actual wastewater flows. A safety factor of 1.5 is being used for
the design flows cited above. Safety factors take into account increased
wastewater strength (i.e. from preparing food on-site), potential variability in
wastewater characteristics and daily flow differences. The design flows listed in
this Memorandum do not consider actual flows, rather they depict design flows
based on the Commonwealth of Virginia Sewac~e Hand#ne and Disposal
Requtations.
If iow flush showerheads and toilets are installed, a conditional permit could be
issued to increase the design flow of the facility from 750 gallons, per day.to,865
gallons per day. This allows.for a 15 per-cent increase in design capacity. The
Scottsville Fire Department may want to consult with a Professional Engineer to
determine if other ideas, such as flow equalization, can be implemented to allow
its proposed new use without requiring major upgrades to the existing sewage
disposal system.
3AVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P, O. 8OX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902-2013
ATTACHMENT G
A. G. TUCKER
RESIDENT ENGINEER
November 16, 1998
December Public Hearings
Mr. Ron Keeier
Department of Planning &
Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA. 22902
Dear Mr. Kee!er:
Please find our comments below for the December Public Hearings:
SP-98-56 Scottsville Volunteer Rescue Squadf Route 6
This should hOC be a major impact co roads In uhe area, however all parking
should be on site.
~ SP-98-57 Vintage Market, Route
..... ~;==ie and
This site is on one of the few passlng zones between c ....... ~-
Char!otZesville. There should be a left and right turn !~ne into the site.
The exlsuing entrances should be closed, since they do hOC meeu current
standards, when the new enurance is constructed. A permlu will be re~aired
for all work within V/DOT right of way.
SP-98-58 John Buscarino, Route 7.95
should noc be a ma]or impact co local roads, however a commercial
enurance should be constructed for access.
SP-98-059 Pegasus Motorcar Companyf Route 250 E.
See site plan comments dated November 4, 1998. (At:ached)
SP-9.8-60 Triton/Beyer! Route 250,E.
Tkis is nou a major impact 5o l'ocal road network, however a commerc~ai
encrance should be constructed for access or through existing commercial
encrance.
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
December 8, 1999
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 - 5823
Fax (804) 972 - 4035
Jackson Zimmerman
Albemarle County School Board
401 Mclntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: SP-99-66 Monticello High School, Tax Map 99, Parcel 2
Dear Mr. Zimmerman:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on December 7, 1999, unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this
approval is subject to the following conditions:
Professional office use shall occur when school is not in session and shall not
exceed one period of sixty (60) consecutive days annually. This sixty (60) day
period shall include the periods to set up the professional office use and to restore
the facilities to a school use.
Hours of operation for graders shall be from 6:30 AM to 8:00 PM. Athletic
facilities may be used until 9:00 PM.
Graders (except local employees) shall be transported to and from the site by bus.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive
public comment at their meeting on December 8, 1999. Any new or additional information regarding your
application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your
scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
Ronald S. Keeler
Chief of Research & Special Projects
RSK/jcf
Cc:;~
Ella Carey
Jack Kelsey
Bob Ball
Amelia McCulley
Steve Allshouse
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and Community Development
Ron Keeler, Chief of Special Projects and Research ~
December 8, 1999
SP-99-066 MONTICELLO HIGH SCHOOL/AIMR LEASING
The Albemarle County Planning Commission at its meeting of December 7, 1999 recommended
approval of SP-99-066 Monticello High School/AIMR Leasing subject to revised conditions as
recommended by staff. The purpose of this memo is to provide explanation of the revised
conditions.
Condition 1.
Professional office use shall occur when school is not in session and shall not
exceed one period of sixty (60) consecutive days annually. This sixty (60) day
period shall include the periods to set up the professional office use and to
restore the facilities to a school use.
Comment: No change was made to this condition. Note that the request is for a 42 day period
operation while the condition allows for a 60 day operation in order to accommodate any
unforseen circumstance.
Condition 2. Hours of operation for ~raders shall be from 6:30 AM to 4,30 8:00 PM. Athletic
facilities may be used until 9:00 PM.
Comment: Graders would normally complete daily work by 5:00 PM, however, extended work
days may occasionally be .required to maintain schedule. This condition would apply only to
graders. After the graders complete, about 20-30 support staff would work an additional 1-2
hours to prepare for the next day.
Condition 3. Graders (except local emolovees) shall be transported to and from the site by bus.
Comment: Thirty graders are local to the area and would likely arrive by auto. The purpose of
this condition is to minimize traffic impacts to the area.
In closing, changes to the conditions are not viewed as substantial, but are intended to offer
flexibility to the proposed operation as well as more clarity for the Zoning Administrator.
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
RON KEELER
DECEMBER 7, 1999
DECEMBER 8, 1999
SP-99-066 MONTICELLO HIGH SCHOOL/AIMR LEASING
Applicant's Proposal: The Association of Investment Management and Research (AIMR)
wishes to lease Monticello High School (MHS) for approximately six weeks of use. Their time
of occupancy would be from mid-June through the beginning of August of 2000. The use of the
building will be for light clerical office work. Their function at Monticello High School will be
to grade tests, which were administered world-wide, for AIMR's Certified Financial Analyst
certificate. AIMR's need is for a single, secure facility which is a quiet and hospitable
environment for the grading of these high stakes tests. Investment professionals of all ages and
nationalities will participate in the grading process.
The impact on the surrounding community is expected to be significantly less than if Summer
School were to operate from this facility. Far less traffic and noise is anticipated if AIMR were
to occupy this facility. If AIMR leases MHS during this time frame, Summer School would
operate from Albemarle High School for the Summer of 2000. AIMR will provide significant
remuneration to the School Board for the lease of this facility and use of provided services.
Petition: The County School Board of Albemarle petitions the Board of Supervisors to issue a
special use permit to allow temporary leasing for office usage in accordance with Section
18.2.2.11 of the Zoning Ordinance which allows for professional offices. The property,
described as Tax Map 91, Parcel 2, is the Monticello High School, and is located int the
Scottsville Magisterial District on Mill Creek Drive [Route 1150]. The property consists of
65.972 acres and is zoned R-15 Residential. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as
Institutional use in Urban Neighborhood Four.
Character of the Area:
To the east of Monticello High School is the Willow Lake residential development and other
undeveloped residential land. Piedmont Virginia Community College is to the north. Abutting
on the west is undeveloped land owned by the County,. On the south side of Mill Creek Drive is
the Tandem School and undeveloped land owned by the County.
RECOMMENDATION:-,
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 (criteria
for issuance ora special use permit) as well as providing a comparative analysis of the office use
to the operation of the high school. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
Planning and Zoning History_:
Following acquisition of this site, it was rezoned to R-15 Residential in order to accommodate
the height of the school building. Acquired land not transferred to the School Board was retained
by the Board of Supervisors and is also zoned R- 15 Residential.
Comprehensive Plan:
The Institutional designation of the Comprehensive Plan is intended to recognize on the Land
Use Plan maps those lands developed or intended to be developed with public uses. The plan
text provides example descriptions of public uses, which includes public and private schools,
universities and colleges. It should be noted that most County schools are used in a manner
consistent with the concept of community center.
STAFF COMMENT:
To evaluate this petition, in addition to the normal evaluation under Section 31.2.4.1, staff has
reviewed this proposal for similarities and dissimilarities to the normal operation of Monticello
High School. StaffwiI1 address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use
permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance
may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of
substantial detriment to ad_iacent property_.
AIMR will have about 60 to 80 staff members for about three (total) weeks to setup, prepare and
remove materials. Operating hours during setup/removal will be regular school hours of 8:00
AM to 4:30 PM. During the three week grading session, operating hours will be from 6:30 AM
to 4:30 PM with limited use of the athletic facilities until 9:00 PM. The grading session will be
continuous throughout this three week period. During the initial week of grading, about 1,100
AIMR graders and support personnel will occupy the site. The following two weeks of grading
will have about 600 to 700 AIMR graders and support personnel.
The earlier start time and continuous usage for the three week period of grading are the only
aspects of the proposal which staff has identified to extend outside of normal school operation.
However, as will be presented later in this report, effort has been made to minimize these
impacts. Regarding continuous weekly usage of school property, this is not uncommon for any
of the public schools in the County which accommodate a variety of uses on weekends.
The closest residential area to the Monticello High School building is Willow Lake. During
review of the site plan for the school a 100-foot buffer was required from Willow Lake together
2
with a fence to be established at the 100-foot buffer setback. This was deemed as adequate
protection to Willow Lake from any deleterious impacts of the school.
that the character of the district will not be changed thereby,
There will be no change in outward appearance of the facility. This is a temporary office use
which staff does not believe will change the character of the district.
and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance,
Staff has reviewed the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as stated in Sections 1.4, 1.5,
and 1.6 (Attachment E). Stafffinds no conflict between the proposed use and these provisions of
the ordinance.
with the, uses permitted by right in the district.
Other vacant land owned by the County is zoned also R-15 Residential, however, it is anticipated
that the land will be developed with public uses, some of which may have the character of
offices.
with additional re_cmlations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance,
Section 5.0 of the ordinance, Supplementary Regulations, does not address this use.
and with the public health, safety and general welfare.
Traffic generation is anticipated to be less than if summer school were in full operation. AIMR
graders (the vast majority of AIMR personnel) will be transported to and from the site by rented
or leased buses to the nine hotels/motels which will providing lodging (Breakfast and lunch will
be provided on-site by Albemarle County School personnel). AIMR support personnel and
school staff will likely travel by passenger vehicle (School staff would consist of food and
custodial staff for the AIMR operation as well as unassociated main office staff).
Security is to be contracted with a private source and will be provided 24 hours per day during
the test grading period. Security will be coordinated with Albemarle Schools and Albemarle
Police.
SUMMARY:
Staff does not find that the proposed temporary usage of Monticello High School as professional
offices to be inconsistent with impacts as may be generated by normal school operation.
Potential adverse impacts of the school were addressed at time of site plan review, which
included a substantial buffer from the Willow Lake residential development.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions (NOTE: The request is for a six
week period, however, staff is recommending an additional three days in the event of unforseen
circumstances):
Recommended Conditions of Approval:
Professional office use shall occur when school is not in session and shall not exceed one
period of sixty (60) consecutive days annually. This sixty (60) day period shall include
the periods to set up the professional office use and to restore the facilities to a school
use.
Hours of operation shall be between 6:30 AM and 4:30 PM. Athletic facilities may be
used until 9:00 PM;
3. Graders shall be transported to and from the site by bus.
ATTACHMENTS:
B-
C-
D-
E-
Location Map
Tax Map
Application for Special Use Permit, submitted by Frank E. Morgan and dated 10/18/99
Letter from School Board Chairman to Board of Supervisors Chairman, dated 11/18/99
Sections 1.4, 1.5 & 1.6 of Zoning Ordinance
4
I
I
I
!
I
I
&
&,
ATTACHMENT A
//~/
SP-99-66 Monticello High School
TO PALMYRA
ATTACHMENT B
33
SP-99-66 Monticello Hieh School
~'88
28F
?.,SG -
ATTACHMENT C
Describe your request in detail and include all pertinent information such as the
number of persons involved in the use, operating hours, and any unique features of
use:
The Association for Investment Management and Research (AIMR) wishes to leases
Monticello High School (MHS) for approximately 6 weeks of use. Their time of
occupancy would be from mid-June through the beginning of August of 2000. The use of
the building will be for light clerical office work. Their function at Monticello High
School will be to grade tests, which were administered world-wide, for AIMR's Certified
Financial Analyst certificate.~IMR's need is for a single, secure facility which is quiet
and hospitable environment for the grading of these high stakes tests. Investment.
professionals of all ages and nationalities will participate in the grading processt~AIMR
will have approximately 60-80 staff members for about 3 total weeks to setup, prepare,
and remove materials. Operating hours during the setup and removal of materials will be
regular school hours of 8:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. During the 3 week grading session,
operating hours will be between 6:30 A.M. and 4:30 P.M., 7 days per week, with limited
use of the athletic facilities until 9:00 P.M. During the first week of the grading session,
approximately 1,100 AIMR graders and support personnel will occupy the facility. The
following 2 weeks will have approximately 600-700 AIMR graders and support
personnel.* Graders will be transported via rented or leased buses. Support personnel
may travel by personal vehicle, however the number will be limited. Custodial services
and food will be provided on site by Albemarle County School personnel. Security is
contracted with a private source and will be 24 hrs. per day during the test grading period.
Secmity will be coordinated with Albemarle County Schools and Albemarle County
Police., The impact on the surrounding community is expected to be significantly less
than if Summer School were to operate from this facility. Far less traffic and noise is
anticipated if AIMR were to occupy this facility. If AIMR leases MHS during this
timeframe, Summer School would operate from Albemarle High School for the Summer
of 2000. AIMR will provide significant renumeration to the School Board for the lease
of this facility and use of provided services.
ATTACHMENT D
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
401 Mclntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596
November I0, 1999
Charles Martin, Chairman, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Martin:
The school division is currently in negotiations with the Association for Investment Management and Research (AIMR) to
rent the Monticello High School for approximately 40 days beginning in mid-June of 2000 to conduct the grading of
international qualifying exams for Certified Financial Analysts. The 40 days would include approximately 20 days for the
actual grading of the exams, with the remaining days used for setup and cleanup. AIMR, which is based in Charlottesville, is
a global, non-stock, non-profit professional organization that serves the worldwide investment community.
The school division stands to earn approximately $140,000-$180,000 after expenses for this rental, which could be used to
address many critical instructional needs. The Child Nutrition Program would also contract separately with AIMR for meal
services during the rental period. Earnings from providing meal services could be utilized for long-term equipment needs for
this financially self-sustaining program.
In working with local government staffon the logistics of this possible rental agreement, the school division was advised by
the Zoning Department that a Special Use Permit would be required for this use of the Monticello facility. This permit would
be required because the area where Monticello High School is located is zoned R15 (High Density Residential). The
activities involved in the rental would be more consistent with a CO (Commercial Office Zoning).
In response, the School Board authorized the application for the Special Use Permit. The Planning Department has indicated
that based on the normal process, a decision by the Board of Supervisors on this application would not be forthcoming until
approximately the middle of January. We have been informed by AIMR of the need to know that the Special Use Permit
would be granted by as early as possible in December, in case other facility arrangements needed to be made.
Because of the need for AIMR to know the status of the application at an earlier point, and because of the significant
financial implications for the school division involved, I have been asked by the School Board to request the Board of
Supervisors to ask local government staff to expedite the Special Use Permit approval process. Specifically, I would ask that
the Planning Commission review this request at its December 7 meeting and that the Board of Supervisors consider it at its
December 8 meeting. I know that this request represents a major deviation form normal procedure; however, the revenue that
this rental would generate could be used in a number of ways to support our students. The School Board would deeply
appreciate the Supervisors' consideration of this special request.
As always, thank you for your strong support of our schools.
~Sir~cerely,
Chairman
cc;
Mr. Robert W. Tucker, County Executive
Dr. Kevin C. Castner, Superintendent
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County School Board
RECEIVED
NOV i o 1999
PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
"We Expect Success"
ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE ATTACHMENT E
CHAPTER 18
ZONING
SECTION 1
AUTHORITY, ESTABLISHMENT, PURPOSE AND OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
Sections:
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1,5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
AUTHORITY AND ENACTMENT
AMENDMENT TO ADOPT
EFFECTIVE DATE, REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES
PURPOSE AND INTENT
RELATION TO ENVIRONMENT
RELATION TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
CERTIFIED COPY, FILING
APPLICATION FOR LAND USE PERMIT; PAYMENT OF DELINQUENT
TAXES
1.1 AUTHORITY AND ENACTMENT
This ordinance, to be cited as the Zoning Ordinance of Albemarle County, is hereby ordained,
enacted and published by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, pursuant to the
provisions of Title 15.2, Chapter 22, Article 7, Code of Virginia, 1950, and amendments thereto.
1.2 AMENDMENT TO ADOPT
An ordinance to reenact and readopt the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance and the Albemarle
County Zoning Map.
Be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia: That the following
ordinance known as the Zoning Ordinance of Albemarle County, Virginia, together with the
Zoning Map attached thereto, be and the same are. readopted and reenacted effective immediately
upon adoption of this ordinance.
1.3 EFFECTIVE DATE, REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES
This Zoning Ordinance of Albemarle County, Virginia, shall be effective at and after 5:15 P.M.,
the 10th day of December, 1980 and at the same time the Albemarle County "Zoning Ordinance"
adopted December 22, 1969, as amended, is hereby repealed.
1.4 PURPOSE AND INTENT
This ordinance, insofar as is practicable, is intended to be in accord with and to implement the
Comprehensive Plan of Albemarle County adopted pursuant to the provisions of Title 15.2,
Chapter 22, Article 3, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and has the purposes and intent set
forth in Title 15.2, Chapter 22, Article 7.
As set forth in section 15.2-2200 of the Code, this ordinance is intended to improve public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of citizens of Albemarle County, Virginia, and to plan for the
future development of communities to the end that transportation systems be carefully planned;
that new community centers be developed with adequate highway, utility, health, educational and
18-1-1
Zoning Supplcmcnt 05, 6-16-99
ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE
recreational facilities; that the needs of agriculture, industry and business be recognized in future
growth; that residential areas be provided with healthy surroundings for family life; that
agricultural and forestal land be preserved; and that the growth of the community be consonant
with the efficient and economical use of public funds. (Added 9-9-92) -
Therefore be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, for the
purposes of promoting the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the public and of
planning for the future development of the community, that the zoning ordinance of Albemarle
County, together with the official zoning map adopted by reference and declared to be a part of
this ordinance, is designed:
1.4.1
TO provide for adequate light, air, convenience of access and safety from fire, flood and other
dangers;
1.4.2
To reduce or prevent congestion in the public streets;
1.4.3
To facilitate the creation of a convenient,.attractive and harmonious community;
1.4.4
To facilitate the provision of adequate police and fire protection, disaster evacuation, civil
defense, transportation, water, sewerage, flood protection, schools, parks, forests,
playgrounds, recreational facilities, airports and other public requirements;
1.4.5
To protect against destruction of or encroachment upon historic areas;
1.4.6
To protect against one or more of the following: overcrowding of land, undue density of
population in relation to the community facilities existing or available, obstruction of light
and air, danger and congestion in travel and transportation, or loss of life, health, or property
from fu'e, flood, panic or other dangers;
1.4.7
To encourage economic development activities that provide desirable employment and
enlarge the tax base; (Amended 9-9-92)
1.4.8
To provide for the preservation of agricultural and forestal lands and other lands of
significance for the protection of the natural environment; (Amended 9-9-92)
1.4.9
To protect approach slopes and other safety areas of licensed airports, including United States
government and military air facilities; (Added I 1-1-89; Amended 9-9-92),
1.4.10
To include reasonable provisions, not inconsistent with the applicable state water quality
standards to protect surface water and groundwater defined in section 62.1-44.85(8) of the
Code of Virginia; and (Added 1 l- 1-89; Amended 9-9-92)
1.4.11
To promote affordable housing. (Added 9-9-92)
1.5 RELATION TO ENVIRONMENT
This ordinance is designed to treat lands which are similarly situated and environmentally similar
in like manner with reasonable consideration for the existing use and character of properties, the
Comprehensive Plan, the suitability of property for various uses, the trends of growth or change,
the current and future land and water requirements of the community for various purposes as
determined by population and economic studies and other studies, the transportation requirements
of the community, and the requirements for airports, housing, schools; parks, playgrounds,
recreation areas and other public services; for the conservation of natural resources; and
preservation of flood plains, the preservation of agricultural and forestal land, the conservation of
properties and their values and the encouragement of the most appropriate use of land throughout
the county. (Amended 11-1-89)
18-I-2
Zoning Supplement #5, 6-16.99
ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE
1.6 RELATION TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
In drawing the zoning ordinance and districts with reasonable consideration of the Comprehensive
Plan, it is a stated and express purpose of this zoning ordinance to create land use regulations
which shall encourage the realization and implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. To this end:
development is to be encouraged in Villages, Communities and the Urban Area; where services
and utilities are available and where such development will not conflict with the
agricultural/forestal or other rural objectives; and development is not to be encouraged in the Rural
Areas which are to be devoted to preservation of agricultural and forestai lands and activities,
water supply protection, and conservation of natural, scenic and historic resources and where only
limited delivery of public services is intended. (Amended 11-1-89)
1.7 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
The unincorporated areas of Albemarle County, Virginia, are hereby divided into districts, as
indicated on a set of map sheets entitled "Zoning Map of Albemarle County, Virginia" which,
together with all explanatory matter thereon, is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a
part of this ordinance.
The Zoning Map shall be identified by the signature or the attested signature of the Chairman of
the Board of Supervisors, together with the date of adoption of this ordinance.
The zoning administrator shall be responsible for maintaining the Zoning Map, which shall be
located in his offices, together with the current zoning status of land and water areas, buildings and
other structures in the county.
The zoning administrator shall be authorized to interpret the current zoning status of land and
water areas, buildings and other structures in the county.
No changes of any nature shall be made on said Zoning Map or any matter shown thereon except
in conformity with the procedures and requirements of this ordinance. It shall be unlawful for any
person te make unauthorized changes on the official Zoning Map. Violations of this provision
shall be punishable as provided in section 37.0.
1.8 CERTIFIED COPY, FILING
A certified copy of the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of Albemarle County, Virginia, shall
be filed in the office of the zoning administrator and in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court
of Albemarle County, Virginia.
1.9 APPLICATION FOR LAND USE PERMIT; PAYMENT OF DELINQUENT TAXES
prior to initiation of the review of an application for a zoning map amendment, special
use permit, variance or other land use permit, the zoning administrator shall require the applicant
to produce satisfactory evidence that all delinquent real estate taxes owed to the County which
have been properly assessed against the subject property have been paid. The applicable time
periods for the review, recommendation and decision on an application for a land use permit shall
be tolled until such evidence is received by the zoning administrator.
18-I-3
Zoning Supplement #5, 6-16-99
November 19, 1999
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 Mclntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 - 5823
Fax (804) 972 - 4035
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Michael R. Matthews, Jr
One Boar's Head Pointe
Charlottesville. VA 22903
RE: ZMA-99-09 Westminster Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
Tax Map 78, ParCels 55A and 55A5
Dear Mr. Matthews:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on November 16, 1999,
unanimously recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors.
Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions:
Special use permit approval for the retirement community (as distinguished from
professional offices) shall not expire but shall remain in effect so long as approval of
ZMA 97-03 remains in effect. The Application Plan shall be considered as conceptual
only in terms of site layout of features such as building footprint, building location, and
road alignment. Approval shall be for uses and limitations as specified in PROJECT
DATA on the ZMA 97-03 Application plan. Setbacks from internal roads and other
vehicular areas shall maintain sight distances as determined by the Department of
Engineering and Public Works. Perimeter setbacks and yard requirements from abutting
residentially zones properties shall not be less than required for such abutting properties.
Staff recommends that existing Condition 2 from ZMA 97-03 be replaced with the following:
Page 2
November 19, 1999
ao
bo
do
The structures intended to house the professional offices permitted under this
special use permit shall not exceed a total of 90,000 square feet, as further
described below. The professional office use within each intended structure, shall
be valid for a period not to exceed five (5) years ~ commencement of
construction of the office buildings;
15,000 square feet of the 90,000 square feet of structures containing the
professional office use(s) shall be permitted to have uses unrelated to WCBR,
provided that all such (ises are contained within the same physical structure;
Any of the remaining 75,000 square feet of structures may contain professional
offices that are not owned and/or operated by WCBR for the exclusive use of the
residents in the PRD, if they consist of uses that complywith the following:
They shall be of a use type compatible with the services and mission of WCBR as
attached (Attachment J). These uses may be open to the general public and
community at large. Such uses shall include the provision of healthcare services
and the administrative and retail components appurtenant thereto, such as: (1)
medical offices, outpatient diagnostic and treatment centers (including outpatient
imaging, same day surgery, oncology, interventional radiology and outpatient
laser procedures); dental and ophthalmic care; physical therapy, rehabilitation and
fitness/wellness programs; community health; and (2) other Professional Office
Uses deemed to provide services to WCBR residents;
WCBR shall construct a physical linkage from its upper campus to the
professional offices via a paved golf cart path, at a width no smaller than the
width of the existing WCBR cart paths, parallel to and of similar slope to Pantops
Mountain Road (or at another location on campus as approved by Albemarle
County Planning Staff) to provide connection between the WCBR campus and the
professional offices. The cart path must be approved with the first professional
office building site plan (after this permit is approved) and constructed before a
Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the first building shown on that plan;
WCBR shall operate a shuttle service, within the WCBR Planned Residential
Development zoning district that is available for transport residents of the district
to and from the professional offices on an "On-call" basis during business hours
of the professional offices;
Page 3
November 19, 1999
Professional office usage and structures referred to in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c)
shall be restricted to Tax Map 78, Parcel 55A as depicted in Attachment A of this
report. Minimum setbacks for building and parking from Route 250 and external
residential areas shall comply with Section 21.0 of the Zoning Ordinance.
o
The wooded area on the Application Plan shown for passive recreation usage shall be
maintained in a natural state except for trail and related improvements as depicted
generally on the Application Plan. This area shall not be subject to general building
development.
Access easements shall be provided to Tax Map 78, Parcel 55A5 (residue) and Tax Map 78,
Parcel 55A1. WCBR will not be required to participate in construction of any such access. At
time of development of those properties, maintenance agreements as required by the private
roads regulations of the Subdivision Ordinance shall be negotiated by the owners of Parcels
55A5, 55A1, and WCBR (and the future heirs and assigns thereof):
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and
receive public comment at their meeting on December 8, 1999. Any new or additional
information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Eric Morrisette, AICP
Senior Planner
Cc: Ella Carey Amelia McCulley
Jack Kelsey Steve Allshouse
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
Eric L. Morrisette, AICP
November 16, 1999
December 08, 1999
ZMA 99-09 Westminster Canterbury of The Blue Ridge
Applicant's Proposal:
The applicant proposes to substitute Condition 2 of the approved PRD [Planned Residential
Development] to allow for additional professional offices. The applicant seeks to establish
professional offices that would serve both the community and the residents of Westminster
Canterbury [WCBR], rather than only for the residents of WCBR.
Petition:
Petition to amend Condition 2 of an approved PRD [ZMA 97-03], by substituting it for
conditions that would serve both the community and the residents of WCBR, rather than only for
the residents of WCBR (Attachment B). Subject property, described as Tax Map 78, parcels 55A
is on a 7.65 acres portion of Westminster Canterbury, which is zoned PRD, Planned Residential
Development, and EC, Entrance Corridor (Attachment A). The property is located on the
northern side of Route 250 West, in front of the existing Westminster Canterbury development
(Attachment A). This site is located within in the Rivanna Magisterial District and is
designated for Urban Density in Urban Neighborhood 3 of the Comprehensive Plan.
Character of the Area:
The subject office buildings would be located approximately 60 feet north of the Route 250 East
right-of-way. The proposed buildings will horizontally align with the existing Martha Jefferson
Office Building located directly to the east. Cottages, owned by WCBR, are located upslope to
the north. The existing cottages are approximately 150 feet from the building sites and
approximately 30 feet higher in elevation. Aunt Sara's Pancake House, zoned HC, Highway
Commercial, is located to the west. Peter Jefferson Place zoned PD-MC, Planned Development -
Mixed Commercial, is located across Route 250 East, to the south.
This site was graded and terraced as a result of the original grading plan for WCBR. The
applicant proposes to construct on the terraced portion of the site and partially within the existing
rear slope, which is dominated by slopes in excess of 25%. The proposed structures will not be
physically connected to this slope, which abuts the WCBR campus. No road improvements are
required as a result of this project.
Planning and Zoning History,:
Zoning Map Amendments:
ZMA 97-03 Westminster Canterbury of The Blue Ridge - August 13, 1997, the Board
of Supervisors approved a rezoning of 28 acres zoned R-10 and R-6 to PR_D, with
conditions (Attachment D). The approval included approval of an overall application
plan for the entire facility. The action included approval ora Special Use Permit request
to allow for professional office uses to be located along the frontage of Route 250 East.
The application plan does depict a conceptual layout of the office buildings, which are
different than the applicant's current proposal (Attachment E). Approval of the plan did
not limit chronology of phasing, nor building locations and sizes as shown on the
application plan.
ZMA 87-09 - May 18, 1988, the Board of Supervisors unanimously approved a rezoning
of 25 acres from R-6 and R-15 to PRD. The only condition imposed a provision of
access for the residual acreage over the single entrance road. Plat recordation recites this
access limitation.
Site Plans:
SDP 99-087 WCBR Porte Cochere Minor Amendment - August 24, 1999, Planning Staff
administratively approved an amendment to add a Porte Cochere to the front "drop-off"
area.
SDP 99-091 Westminster Canterbury Assisted Living Facility Final Site Plan - June 18,
1999, Planning Staff signed plans to allow for the construction of a 45,000 square foot
assisted living center, which is currently under construction.
o
SDP 98-060 Westminster Canterbury Assisted Living Facility Preliminary Site Plan -
October 6, 1998, Planning Commission unanimously approved construction of a 45,000
square foot assisted living center within the WCBR campus.
SDP 99-052 Martha Jefferson Hospital at WCBR Minor Amendment - May 5, 1999
Landscape revisions approved by Planing.
SDP 98-123 Martha Jefferson Hospital at WCBR Final Site Plan - August 27, 1998,
Planning staff signed plans for a 12,000 square foot medical office building. The plan
was approved as a minor amendment to allow for the construction of an additional 3,000
square feet of building [ 15,000 total square feet].
2
o
o
o
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
SDP 98-010 Martha Jefferson Hospital at WCBR Preliminary Site Plan - April 06, 1998,
Planning Staff granted administrative approval to construct a 12,000 square foot medical
office building at the front entrance of WCBR.
SDP 98-003 Duplex Units Preliminary Site Plan - March 18, 1998, Planning Staff granted
administrative approval to construct 16 dwelling units adjacent to the southeast side of
the main building. The Planning Commission granted a critical slope waiver. Final
approval has since been granted and the units are currently under construction.
SDP 97-028 Major Amendment - June 19, 1997, the Site Review Committee signed the
plan, which allowed for construction of 19 new radial parking spaces at the main entrance
and screening walls. The Planning Commission granted one-way circulation and
curvilinear parking waivers.
SDP 97-015 Minor Amendment - March 07, 1997, Planning Staff signed the amendment
to allow for construction of a terrace and screening walls for the existing grill area.
SDP 95-0113 Health Care Expansion Minor Amendment - December 22, 1995, Planning
Staff signed the amendment to allow for the construction of an activity room at the
existing health care facility.
SDP 95-023 Parking Lot Minor Amendment - April 21, 1995, Planning Staff signed the
amendment to allow for ten [10] new parking spaces in the northern parking lot.
SDP 93-061 Healthcare Expansion Minor Amendment - June 03, 1994, Planning Staff
signed the amendment to allow for an expansion to the western end of the main building.
SDP 91-053 Entrance Lighting Minor Amendment - August 21, 1991, Planning Staff
signed the amendment to allow for the addition of three [3] light poles at the main
entrance of the community.
SDP 91-048 Pool Building Minor Amendment - June 20, 1991, Planning Staff signed the
amendment to allow for the construction of a pool building, maintenance buildings, and a
service road. The file also includes Planning approval of a minor amendment allowing
for the addition of cottages.
SDP 88-103 Westminster Canterbury Final Site Plan - December 22, 1988, the Site
Review Committee signed the plan to allow for the construction of 40 cottages, 81
apartment units, and a health care facility.
SDP 88-059 Westminster Canterbury Preliminary Site Plan - September 27, 1998, the
Planning Commission unanimously approved the plan, with conditions. The apProved
plan included construction of 40 cottages, 81 apartment units, and a health care facility.
3
Subdivisions:
SUB 88-033 Virginia Land Trust - The Director of Plarming administratively approved a
plat combining three parcel to create one single 25 acre tract for the location of
Westminster Canterbury of the Blue Ridge.
SUB 88-197 Westminster Canterbury - The Director of Planning administratively
approved a plat restricting access of the combined parcels to one single entrance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Ordinance and recommends approval.
Comprehensive Plan:
This area is recommended for Urban Density in Neighborhood 3. The Comprehensive Plan does
not specifically speak to non-residential uses in designated residential districts. The
Comprehensive Plan does suggest that adequate buffering, screening, and physical separation of
non-residential uses be accomplished to alleviate relational problems. This site has been
anticipated for office use activities in support of the residents of WCBR since 1997 and the
existing two-story building has existed in harmony with the surrounding residential community
[WCBR] for over one year. The construction of two additional office buildings would require
County approval of both preliminary and final site plans and the suggested relational guidelines
of the Comprehensive Plan can be addressed at that time.
One of the Land Use Plan recommendations for Neighborhood 3 states; "limit strip development
of Route 250 East by preventing commercial development along the north side of the road from
1-64 to the Regional Service designated area" [east of this site]. Although the primary focus of
the recommendation has been to limit retail development in this area, staff does find office uses
to be of a commercial nature. Staff would suggest that the existing WCBR offices and the office
space planned or developed at Peter Jefferson Place could serve most of the professional office
needs for this immediate area. As previously stated, this site has been anticipated for office use
activities in support of the residents of WCBR since 1997 and staff therefore finds the approved
uses to be supportive of the requested office uses.
Route 250 East is defined as an Entrance Corridor in Albemarle County. The subject parcel is
therefore subject to Albemarle County Architectural Review Board [ARB] approval. ARB
approval is not required until the site plan review process. The ARB did review the first of the
three buildings (15,000 square feet) and found no conflict with the approved design. During
review of the plan, the ARB reviewed a conceptual plan that was similar to the revised
4
application plan and found no conflict with the building locations. Although the ARB did
indicate that "...approval of the first building would not lock the Board into any particular layout
for future phases", they did acknowledge that "...the phase one building will set the standard for
future buildings" (Attachment L). Since the ARB reviews structures as to how they relate to
other structures in the district, and their alignment with the Entrance Corridor, the overall three-
building design was endorsed. It is therefore anticipated that the ARB will have minimal issues
with this proposal during the site review process.
Route 250 East is also within the viewshed of Monticello. The Plan recommends that "New
development along Route 250 East should be designed in a manner that is sensitive to its location
within Monticello's viewshed". The applicant will be required work with Monticello to address
any concerns in the site review process. Monticello had no concerns with regards to the first
building and it is therefore anticipated that they will have minimal concerns with the other
proposed buildings.
Staff Comment:
Staff provides discussion related to the applicant's request in three parts:
1)
2)
3)
ZMA 97-03;
Section 8 of the Zoning Ordinance
Critical Slopes Waiver Request
ZMA 97-03.
On August 13, 1997, the Board of Supervisors approved [ZMA 97-03] a rezoning of 28 acres
zoned R-10 and R-6 to PRD, with conditions (Attachment D). The Board's approval included
an application plan for the entire WCBR property. The application plan included a conceptual
layout for three buildings totaling 90,000 square feet along the Route 250 East frontage
(Attachment E). The buildings were arranged in a semi-circle with the largest building [60,000
square feet] physically tied to the central WCBR campus by locating the building into the
hillside. Therefore, the building would have first floor ground access on the Route 250 side
while providing for WCBR residential access in the rear, on the third floor. The approval of the
plan did not limit chronology of phasing, nor building locations and sizes as shown on the
application plan.
The Board's approval of ZMA 97-03 included approval of a special use permit request to allow
for professional office uses to be located along the frontage of Route 250 East, within the PRD.
No separate SP application was required under Section 19.3.2 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Condition 2 of the rezoning specifically limits the square footage of professional office buildings
unrelated to WCBR to a maximum of 15,000 square feet. The applicable portion of Condition 2
states, "The floor area of the professional office building(s) shall not exceed 15,000 square feet."
The purpose of this condition was to allow for 15,000 square feet of office uses that would be
independent of WCBR's operation. It was envisioned that the remaining uses would be
affiliated with WCBR. The large building in the center [4-story/60,000 square feet] was
presented to house senior center activities for the residents and the general community, while the
westernmost building [ 15,000 square feet] was approved for uses functional to the WCBR
operations. It is worth noting that these uses were preferred by the County instead of a potential
commercial "strip" development that has occurred just east of the subject parcel [Pantop's
Mountain].
The Zoning Department has reviewed the approval of ZMA 97-03 and has determined that the
inclusion of Condition 2's limitation of 15,000 square feet for professional office use "... to
mean the other 75,000 square feet of buildings are required to be for the exclusive use of
WCBR" (Attachment F). The applicant seeks to amend Condition 2 to allow the other 75,000
square feet of buildings to be owned and/or leased by other professional office uses and not to be
used as described in the above paragraph (Attachment B). Letters of support from the Chairman
and the Board of Directors for WCBR are attached as Attachment G.
Section 8 o_f the Zoning Ordinance:
The Planned Development regulations of Section 8 state the intent is to promote: "...economic
and efficient land use through unified development; improved levels of amenities; appropriate
and harmonious physical development; creative design; and, a better environment than generally
realized through conventional district regulations" (Attachment H). Section 8 specifically states
such developments shall be developed: "... to provide for comfort and convenience of residents;
to facilitate protection of the character of surrounding neighborhoods; and to lessen travel impact
through a reasonably short travel time between origins and destinations of persons living,
working, or visiting in such developments."
Therefore, the intent of Section 8 is to insure that uses within the PRD provide services that are
complimentary to the residents of WCBR. The Zoning Administrator has reviewed the
applicant's request for 75,000 square feet of additional office use and can support the request if
the uses "provide a service to WCBR and the Charlottesville-Albemarle community in general
and be in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance." Condition 2 has been modified to limit the
types of professional offices as suggested by the Zoning Administrator. Examples of the uses
[primarily medical and dental] are included in, but not limited to, the revised condition
(Condition 2c).
Also, the development standards in Section 8 require the provision for the comfort and
convenience of the residents and to protect the character of the WCBR complex. As previously
stated, the approved application plan showed the center building physically located in the
hillside, which provided access to both the ground level of the frontage parcel and the ground
level of the higher elevated WCBR campus. The revised application plan deviates from this
design by horizontally aligning all three buildings, therefore not locating the center building into
the hillside. The design is preferred by the applicant for 6 reasons:
The revised design moves the largest building approximately 75 feet from the
location shown on the original application plan. This increase of 75 feet aids in
appeasing the concerns of the residents in the cottages on top of the hill, who had
relayed complaints back to the applicant; (It is worth noting that the applicant has
held advisory meetings with the residents of the cottages to address relational
concerns.)
The horizontal alignment of the three buildings appears to provide a visually
cohesive design. The ARB did review the first of the three buildings (15,000
square feet) and found no conflict with the approved design. The ARB did review
the first of the three buildings (15,000 square feet) and found no conflict with the
approved design. During review of the plan, the ARB reviewed a conceptual plan
that was similar to the revised application plan and found no conflict with the
building locations. Although the ARB did indicate that "...approval of the first
building would not lock the Board into any particular layout for future phases",
they did acknowledge that "...the phase one building will set the standard for
future buildings" (Attachment L). Since the ARB reviews structures as to how
they relate to other structures in the district, and their alignment with the Entrance
Corridor, the overall three-building design was endorsed. It is therefore
anticipated that the ARB will have minimal issues with this proposal during the
site review process.
o
The relocation of the center building allows for parking to be screened in the rear
of the building rather than entirely loaded in the front of the building. The ARB
continuously seeks to minimize the negative visual impacts of large parking lots
by seeking designs where the buildings serve to provide screening of the parking
lots from Entrance Corridors. It is anticipated that the ARB would prefer this
design to a large parking lot visible to the Entrance Corridor;
Where possible, Planning Staff seeks to "break-up" large parking lots. This
design not only visually diminishes the negative appearance of a large parking lot,
but provides more convenient access for customers as parking can be located
closer to the building;
7
o
The location of a building into the hillside provides for a less than desirable lease
space, because the majority of the building could not support the installation of
windows. Windows provide for marketable incentives for lease purposes; and,
o
The revised layout provides for travelways that are more easily navigable between
buildings that the prior layout.
Since the subject parcel is zoned PRD, the proposed uses should be physically connected to the
existing residential development. Since the main building has been relocated from the hillside
the applicant is therefore required to provide an alternate means to allow for safe and convenient
access of the subject site to and from the WCBR campus. Planning staff has worked with the
applicant to address various options such as the possibility of installing an elevator tower or
handicapped ramping on the slope and has concluded that the financial obligations associated
with such projects may not offset the anticipated minimal usage of them. Therefore the applicant
has agreed to the following conditions regarding physical connectivity of the two sites:
WCBR shall provide a physical linkage from its upper campus to the professional
offices via a paved, three foot wide golf cart path parallel to and of similar slope
to Pantop's Mountain Road (or at another location on campus as approved by
Albemarle County Planning) to provide connection between the WCBR campus
and the professional offices. The cart path must be approved with the next
professional office building site plan and constructed before a Certificate of
Occupancy is issued for such building; and,
WCBR shall operate a shuttle service, within the subject parcels, that is available
for transport to and from the professional offices on an "On-call" basis during
business hours of the professional offices.
Critical Slopes Waiver Request:
Construction of these office buildings will require disturbance of the critical slopes located
toward the rear of the subject parcel. Since disturbance of the critical slopes is necessary to
construct the buildings as depicted in the Application Plan, the applicant is requesting a critical
slope waiver to grade. The request and justification is attached as Attachment I. Attachment K
depicts the areas of critical slopes on site.
Section 4.2.3.2 of the Zoning Ordinance restricts earth-disturbing activity on critical slopes and
section 4.2.5.2 allows Planning Commission modification of this restriction upon finding that
strict application of the restriction would not forward the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance. The
critical slopes were created as a result of grading during the original construction of WCBR. As
such, they are man-made and not landscaped. The applicant notes that not only are the slopes
man-made, but they have also been disturbed in the past as a result of a sewer line installation.
Planning staff finds the request and justification to be similar to prior critical slope waiver
requests. Although no grading conflicts are anticipated as a result of similar grading that was
approved for the recently constructed 15,000 square foot medical office building, staff cannot
recommend approval as a result of limited information. Historically, staff has recommended
approval of critical slope waivers when detailed information regarding the specific limits of
grading and methods of slope stabilization are provided. Since the Application Plan is somewhat
conceptual, the applicant cannot provide the grading specifications that are normally provided in
the site plan process. Without such information for the Engineering Department to review, staff
cannot accurately determine the level of impact to the critical slopes. Also, without ARB review
of the grading of the slopes, staff cannot determine the level of impact to the possible loss of
aesthetic resources. Therefore, staff cannot recommend Planning Commission approval a critical
slope waiver at this time.
SUMMARY:
Staff has identified the following factors, which are favorable to this petition:
The revised application plan moves the largest building an additional 75 feet from the
cottages on the hill;
The application plan offers a design that minimizes the negative appearance of a large
parking lot by placing some of the parking in the rear of the building;
o
The application plan offers a design that increases the convenient access to the building
by placing some parking close to the building by putting the spaces along the rear of the
building;
°
The additional 75,000 square feet of professional office is in character with Section 8 by
providing uses that are complimentary to the mission of WCBR (Condition 2b);
o
The additional 75,000 square feet of professional office is in character with Section 8 by
providing a physical connection between the office buildings and the WCBR campus
(Conditions 2c and 2d); and,
o
The building footprints as shown on the revised application plan provide for a more
cohesive vertical alignment with the footprint of the first constructed building of 15,000
square feet.
Staff has identified the following factors, which are unfavorable to this request:
More generalized commercial and business activity that is less related to the WCBR
operation;
2. More general traffic not related to WCBR will frequent the site; and
3. Insufficient information to support the critical slope waiver request.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff finds this proposal to be in compliance with Section 8 of the Zoning Ordinance and the
Comprehensive Plan and recommends approval, including the revised application plan, with
conditions. Staff does not recommend Planning Commission issuance of a critical slope waiver
at this time.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
This application is an amendment to ZMA 97-03. Therefore staff recommends retention of the
original conditions, except for Condition 2, as follows:
Special use permit approval for the retirement community (as distinguished from
professional offices) shall not expire but shall remain in effect so long as approval of
ZMA 97-03 remains in effect. The Application Plan shall be considered as conceptual
only in terms of site layout of features such as building footprint, building location, and
road alignment. Approval shall be for uses and limitations as specified in PROJECT
DATA on the ZMA 97-03 Application plan. Setbacks from internal roads and other
vehicular areas shall maintain sight distances as determined by the Department of
Engineering and Public Works. Perimeter setbacks and yard requirements from abutting
residentially zones properties shall not be less than required for such abutting properties.
staff recommends that existing Condition 2 from ZMA 97-03 be replaced w/th the following:
go
The structures intended to house the professional offices permitted under this special
use permit shall not exceed a total of 90,000 square feet, as further described below.
The professional office use within each intended structure, shall be valid for a period
not to exceed five (5) years to commencement of construction of the office buildings;
10
15,000 square feet of the 90,000 square feet of structures containing the professional
office use(s) shall be permitted to have uses unrelated to WCBR, provided that all
such uses are contained within the same physical structure;
Any of the remaining 75,000 square feet of structures may contain professional
offices that are not owned and/or operated by WCBR for the exclusive use of the
residents in the PRD, if they consist of uses that comply with the following:
They shall be of a use type compatible with the services and mission of WCBR as
attached (Attachment J). These uses may be open to the general public and
community at large. Such uses shall include the provision of healthcare services and
the administrative and retail components appurtenant thereto, such as: (1) medical
offices, outpatient diagnostic and treatment centers (including outpatient imaging,
same day surgery, oncology, interventional radiology and outpatient laser procedures);
dental and ophthalmic care; physical therapy, rehabilitation and fitness/wellness
programs; community health; and (2) other Professional Office Uses deemed to
provide services to WCBR residents;
jo
WCBR shall construct a physical linkage from its upper campus to the professional
offices via a paved golf cart path, at a width no smaller than the width of the existing
WCBR cart paths, parallel to and of similar slope to Pantops Mountain Road (or at
another location on campus as approved by Albemarle County Planning Staff) to
provide connection between the WCBR campus and the professional offices. The
cart path must be approved with the first professional office building site plan (after
this permit is approved) and constructed before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued
for the first building shown on that plan;
ko
WCBR shall operate a shuttle service, within the WCBR Planned Residential
Development zoning district that is available for transport residents of the district to
and from the professional offices on an "On-call" basis during business hours of the
professional offices;
Professional office usage and structures referred to in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) shall
be restricted to Tax Map 78, Parcel 55A as depicted in Attachment A of this report.
Minimum setbacks for building and parking from Route 250 and external residential
areas shall comply with Section 21.0 of the Zoning Ordinance.
o
The wooded area on the Application Plan shown for passive recreation usage shall be
maintained in a natural state except for trail and related improvements as depicted
generally on the Application Plan. This area shall not be subject to general building
development.
7. Access easements shall be provided to Tax Map 78, Parcel 55A5 (residue) and Tax Map
78, Parcel 55A1. WCBR will not be required to participate in construction of any such
11
access. At time of development of those properties, maintenance agreements as required
by the private roads regulations of the Subdivision Ordinance shall be negotiated by the
owners of Parcels 55A5, 55A1, and WCBR (and the future heirs and assigns thereof).
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Tax Map and Location Map
B - Applicant's Petition for Rezoning
C - Revised Application Plan
D - ZMA 97-03 Conditions of Approval
E - ZMA 97-03 Application Plan
F - Zoning Administrators Memo Dated September 17, 1999
G - Letters From the Chairman and the Board of Directors for WCBR
H - Section 8 of the Zoning Ordinance
I - Critical Slope Waiver Request
J - Mission Statement of WCBR
K - Sketch Plan Delineating Critical Slope Disturbance
L - ARB Comments Dated March 5, 1998
12
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
62
g
20M
ATTACHMENT A
\
49
MONTICELLO
'~'= ' '"' SCO~SVILLE AND
'=--' ........... ~ RIVANNA 'DISTRICTS
SECTION
", I.`````--`% '
99-09 Westminster Canterbury of the Blue Rid e
TOM
Hill
3
1168 116% ~.~
I
Ove~on
ATTACI-I~.I~NT A
C. Henry Hinnant, III
President and Chief Executive Officer
ATTACHMENT B
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Donald D Sandr~dge,
Chairman
Arthur G. Kiser
Vice-Chairman
Mr James L. Brown
Mrs. Robert Bruner
The Rev. Jeffrey Fishwick
Dennis W Good. Jr
E. Howard Goodwin
Gerald B. Haeckel
Thomas C. Lynch
Mrs, Caw N. Moon, Jr.
Mrs Bruce Murray
dorm A. Owen. Jr., M.D.
Frank E. Taylor M.D.
Wenoall L. Win& Jr.
Canterbury' of the
Blue Ridy, e ~s
firmly commirted
ro being an c~vo.
cate for rhe ek~rty
&rough providing
programs .~nd a
high quality' en-
vtronmenr ]or a
~mn~strs, bx'.. with
and for the awng
persm~s of the
Charto ttes ville/
Albemarle area.
Our m~xsion is to
provi~ tM ~e~r-
ship. resources
and managemeng
necessarx' ro en-
sure a WCBR
community fldly
responsive ro the
complete and dy-
~am~c needs of the
a~ng of our re'ea.
Description and Justification of Request
Westminster-Canterbury of thc Blue Ridge
Zoning Map Minor Amendment Request
August 23. 1999
Requesi
Westminster Canterbury of the Blue Ridge requests that the statement "Gross Floor
Area of the professional office building(s) shall not exceed 15,000 sf' contained as
condition ~2 of ZMA-97-03 be deleted, thus permitting professional office use on the
Z65 acre parcel iocated..on Route 250 at Pantops Mountain Road.
History
Westminster Canterbury of the Blue Ridge (WCBR) is approaching its tenth year of
operation as a nationally recognized and accredited Continuing Care Retirement
Center. In 1997, WCBR was granted approval with conditions by Albemarle County
through ZMA 97-03 to incorporate 28 acres of property behind the center, and 7.65 acres
in front of the center, into our PRD zoning designation.
At the time of the rezorting, a comprehensive plan was presented for the expansion of
our main campus over a ten year period, called Plan 2000. This included the
development of additional cottages and 125 independent Living apartments on the
upper campus. We have diligently pursued the expansion in general accordance with
that plan. No definitive plans had been formed for the 7.65 acre property other than a
professional office facility of up to 15,000 square feet that would be constructed on the
eastern corner of the property. Master planning in response to the County's
memorandum of 5/8/97 (item 2) was conducted to assist the County in determining
impacts of the potential development. Three buildings totaling 90,000 sf were
conceptualized for uses assumed to be undefined offices and senior services. Since these.
were conceptual only and no real plans were in place, plan note 16 stated:
"L II, III, IV = scheduled phasing. This will vary according to need and
demand - this is for informational purpose only and will change. Buildings,
building location] and parking are schematic only. Approval of this plan does
not imply approval of features identified as 'proposed future development'.'
The only development planned on the lower parcel at the t-ime of the rezoning, the
initial office building, was developed pursuant to SDP-98-010. The building is now a
15,000 square foot office building that includes primary care, women's health services,
and the offices of Hospice of the Piedmont. The location of the building was changed
from that shown in ZMA 97-03 based on a new master plarmmg study presented as
Sheet C3 of 8/28/98 and made a part of SDP 98-010, which provided for a linear
development of three buildings along the Route 9_50 corridor. This was partly in
response to discussions with the County regarding aesthetic concerns in the Entrance
Corridor and the Monticello view corridor, which, might be better served by a more
traditional s ,tyle development with parking Split by the building masses. Concerns
were also expressed with the functionality and aesthetics of the large building
constructed in the hilNide as conceptualized in ZMA 97-03.
250 PANTOPS MOUNTAIN ROAD. CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22911 TELEPHONE (804) 980-9100 FAX (804) 980-9173
A continuing care retirement community related to the Presuytenan and Episcopal churches
Westminster Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
Zoning Map Amendment Request
Page 2
Justification
ATTACHMENT B
As a Continuing Care Retirement Center, WCBR is a comprehensive adult community
with services ranging from independent living to skilled nursing care. We provide
medical and nursing care services, physical therapy, occupational therapy, minor
medical treamaents, 24 hour nursing care, and a physician holds reg-uiar office hours at
the health clinic. UnLike centers that focus only on residential or assisted living
facilities for seniors, a continuing care retirement center such as WCBR provides broad
healthcare services as a vital part of our services to our residents. In the staff report for
ZMA 97-03, staff concludes that "professional office usage is directly related to, if not
integral to, the concept of the planned development and WCBR's desire to provide
community outreach." This statement is even more accurate today as we grow and as
healthcare technology continues to change rapidly. We believe our application to
remove the limitation is consistent with the intent of the PRD zoning district g-iven our
special services and the nature of this property.
The initial 15,000 square foot office building on the subject property has been a great
success for all involved. Our residents have convenient access to care and related
services beyond those we can provide in our facility alone. Our shuttle bus provides an
excellent link Dom the upper campus to the medical center. The community has access
to quality professional services and healthcare, delivered bv those who specialize in
that care, where these services are most needed: in the Gro~vth Area. The building, in
our biased opinion, is also an architectural asset in an.important corridor.
The continued growth of WCBR through our Plan 2000, the integral role of health and
professional services with the mission of a Continuing Care Retirement Center, and the
success of the initial medical facility have g-iven rise to our request to expand
professional office use on our property,. For this reason we are requesting a minor
amendment to ZM.A 97-03 to permit professional office use on the 7.65 acre parcel. Note:
We are not seeking any increase in density or appreciable change in need for
Cotmty services beyond those previously submitted to the County;
Our initial building has been a success for WCBR and the con'unurtity, and shows
the value to the community of partnerships between complementary service
providers;
Professional offices are permitted by special use in a PRD with no statutory
limitation on square footage. Since healthcare and' other professional services
are integral to the WCBR mission, and since the ordinance contemplates
professional offices in a PRD, we feel the combination is uniquely appropriate
for this specific property in the Growth Area;
WCBR is a specialized facility that is growing in response to a growth in our
elderly population. We desire to provide access to a broad range of professional
services, whether provided directly by WCBR or bv others, and to also make
those services (where appropriate) available to the general public.
We appreciate your consideration of ~ request and look forward to a favorable
review. Please do not hesitate to contact us at any time.
OFFICE USE ONLY _
ZM^#,
Application for Zoning Map Amend
~,cp~.rtment o! tStuldip~-Code and ZOning Servic_,es
ATTACHMENT B
ProjectName(howshouldwerefertothisapplication?) Westminster Canterbury of
*Existing Zoning PRD Proposed Zoning PRD
(*staff will a~st you with this item)
Number of acres to be rezoned/v a portion it most be delineated on plat) . 7.651
the Blue Ridge
Is this an amendment to an existing Planned District? cI Yes ca No
Is this an amendment' to existing proffers? o Yes ~ No
Are you submitting a preliminary site development plan with this application? ca Yes
Are you submitting a preliminary subdivision plat with this application? a Yes ClNo
Are you proffering a plan with this application? c~ Yes ~No
Contact Person (who should we call/writ~ conceming this project?): Michael R. Matthews ~ Jr.
Addmss One Boar's Head Pointe
City Charlottesville State VA Zip22903
Daytime Phone ( .. 804 )
293-8004 Fax# [804) 293-6256 E-m~l
Owrlerofland(asUs~di. mcCounty,sr~o~): Westminster Canterbury of the Blue
Address 250 Pantops Mountain Road City Charlottesville State__
DaythnePhone(804) 980-9100 . Fax# (804) 980-9173 E-mail
Ridge
VA Zip 22911
Applicant(WhoistheContactpersonrepresenung?Whoisrequestingthcre.zoning?): Westminster Canterbury of the
~ddress 250 Pantops Mountain Road City. Charlottesville State VA Zip
Daytime Phone ( 804 )980-9100 Fax# (804) 980-9,173 E-mail.
Blue Ridge
22911
[Tax map and parcel .... 7.8-55A
Physical Address(irassigned) Pantops Mountain Place (1490 Adjacent)
Locat/onofproperty(landmarks, intemecdons, orother) Pantops Mountain Road at US Route 250
Does the owner of this property own (or have any ownership interest in) any abutting property? If yes. please list those tax
map andparcelnumbers 78-55A Parcel "¥" and 78-55A5 Parcel "X"
OFFICE USE ONLY . .~ :~-,' . - ~'~] _
Fee amount $ / '~'- ~/-~ Date Paid ~ 3f'6ta~Check # 0 ~ '~ 0 Receipt#
(Under 50 Ac~s = $815 50 acLes or more = $1 255 Minor ~¢ndment t~or~v~us reaue~t = $175)
~etter of Authorization
401 Mc~tire Road -:- Ch~lottesville, VA 22902 -:- Voice: 296-5832 + F~: 972~I26
ATTACHMENT B
Section 15. I- 490 of the Code of Virginia states that, "Zoning ordinances aha aistncts snarl 0e drawn
and applied with reasonable consideration for the existing use and character of the property, the
comprehensive plan, the suitability of property for various uses, the trends of growth or change, the
current and future' requirements of the community as to land for various purposes as determined by
population and economic studies and other studies, the transportation requirements of the community.
the requirements for airports, housing, schools, parks, playgrounds, recreation areas and other public
services, the conservation .of natural resources, the preservation of flood plains, the preservation of
agricultural and forestal land, the conservation of properties and their values, and the encouragement of
the most appropriate use of lend'throughout the county or municipality."
These are the items which will be reviewed by the staff in their analysis of your request, Please provide
any additional information you feel is necessary to assist the County in its review of your request. If you
need assistance filling out these items, staff is available,
What is the Comprehensive Plan designation for this property? Urban Density Res idential
Whatpubliene~ orbenefitdoesthismzoningse~e? Delivery of needed healthcare,
and related services to both WCBR residents and ~he
as part of a planned development.
A~pub~icwater~sewer~andr~adsav~ab~e~ethissite?~i~erebeanyimpact~nthesefaci~ities? Yes.
No significant impacts beyond those already permitted.
eldercare,
community at large
X~v'hatimp~twilltherebeontheCoun~'snatural, scenic, andhistohcresources? No change from impacts
..permitted by ZMA 97-03 and referenced on Sheet C3 of SDP-98-010.
~PT~NAL:D~y~uhavep~anst~deve~pthe~r~pe~yiftherez~ningisa~r~ved?~fsS~e~edescribe:P~anning
stages for additional healthcare services.
If you would like to proffer any restrictions on the development of the property, please list these proffers on the following
optional attachment entitled, "PROFFER FORM". Proffers are voluntary_ offers to use property in a mom mstrmtive way
than the overall zoning district classification would allow.
By State Code, proffers must have a reasonable relationship to the rezoning and are not mandatory. The rezoning must give
rise to the need for the proffers; the proffers must be related to the physical development or physical operanon of the property;
and the proffers must be in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan.
2
Describe your request in detail including why you are requesting this particular zonifig district?
See Attached.
ATTACHMENTS REQUIRED - Provide two(2) copies of each: ATTACHMENT B
~ I. Recorded plat or boundary survey of the property requested for the rezoning. If there is no recorded
plat or boundary survey, please provide legal description of the property and the Deed Book and
page number or Plat Book and page number.
Note: If you are requesting a rezoning for a portion of the property, it needs to be described or
delineated on a copy of the plat or surveyed drawing.
Ownership information - If ownership of the.proi~rty is in the name of any type of legal entity
or organization including, but not limited to, the name ora corporation, partnership or association,
or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious name, a document acceptable to the County must be
submitted certifying that the person signing below has the authority to do so.
If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted
containing the owner's written consent to the application.
If the applicant is the ag6nt of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted
that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency.
OPTIONAL ATTACHMENTS:
Drawings or conceptual plans, if any.
Proffer Form signed by the owner(s).
Additional Information, if any.
I hereby certify that I own the subject property, or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in filing this
application. I also certify ~,at the information provided is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Signature. Date
C. Henry Hinnant
Printed Name
(804) 980-9100
Daytime phone number of Signator)'
ATTACHMENT B
T.M. 7~
PA~ '~
~,-21-:L99'? 12: 49F, r't
ATTACHMENT C
"'- -.,.. /
./,/
SdO.I. NYd - ,osl~:;i=l=i:;ir VH.LIdYW
ATTACHMF~NT C
Robert W. Tucker. Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
Date: August 15. 1997
Page: 5 ATTACHMENT D
transfer of the Rural Preservation Tract to only one of the aforementioned lots;
Any plat submitted for a Rural Preservation Development shall be reviewed
under the administrative review procedures and no separate action by the
Planning Commission shall be required for the creation of a Rural Preservation
Development unless review by the Planning Commission is required pursuant
to the administrative review procedures; and
5. Only one additional dwelling shall be allowed in the area of Parcel 8. Such
additional dwelling shall be permitted only after approval of the Rural
Preservation Developmeist approved in accord with this permit on the
Preservation Tract.
item No. I 1. SP-97-30. U.S. Cellular Tower (Ivy) (Sign #69). Public hearing on a
request to construct cellular telecommunications tower on 2 ac. Znd LI. TM58,P37G.
Samuel Miller District.
DEFERRED the public hearing until September ! 0, 1997, since the public notice
sign had been removed.
item No. 12. ZMA-97-3. Westminster Canterbury, of the Blue Ridge (Sign #87).
Public hearing on a request to rezone + 38.2 acs from R-10 [TM78,P55A, 7.651 acs] & R-
& R-6 [TM78,Pcls55A4 (pt of)&55A5 (pt of)] to allow for expansion of estab retirement
community, [TM78,Pcls 55A6, 28.39 acs] & allow professional offices. Rivanna Dist.
APPROVED the request with four conditions:
--~ 1. Special,use permit approval for the retirement community (as distinguished
from professional offices) shall not expire, but shall remain in effect so long as
approval of ZMA-97-03 remains in effect. The Application Plan shall be
considered as conceptual only in terms of site layout of features such as
building footprint, building location and road alignment. Approval shall be for
uses and limitations as specified in PROJECT DATA on the Application Plan.
Setbacks from internal roads and other vehicular areas shall maintain sight
distances as determined by the Department of Engineering and Public Works.
Perimeter setbacks and yard requirements from abutting residentially zoned
properties shall not be less than required for such abutting properties;
Memo, m Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
Date: August 15. [ 997
?age: 6
ATTACHMENT D
Special use permit approval for professional offices shall be valid for a period
not to exceed five (5) years to commencement of construction. For the
purpose of this condition, "commencement of construction" shall be construed
to mean the commencement of construction of the office building(s). Gross
floor area of the professional office building(s) shall not exceed 15,000 square
feet. Professional office usage is restricted to Tax Map 78, Parcel 55A as
depicted in Attachment C (copy attached) of this report. Minimum setbacks
for building and parking from Route 250 and external residential areas shall
comply with Section 21.0 of the Zoning Ordinance;
The wooded area on the Application Plan shown for passive recreation usage
shall be maintained in a natural state except for trail and related improvements
as depicted generally on the Application Plan. This area shall not be subject to
general building development; and
Access easement shall be provided to Tax Map 78, Parcel 55A5 (residue) and
Tax Map 78, Parcel 55AI as depicted on Attachment C of this report. WCBR
will not be required to participate in construction of any such access. At time
of development of those properties, maintenance agreements as required by the
private roads regulations of the Subdivision Ordinance shali be negotiated by
the owners of TM 78, Parcel 55A5 and TM 78, Parcel 55A5I and WCBR.
Item No. 13. Public hearing on an Ordinance to amend reordain Section 2.1-4, of
Chapter 2. l, Agricultural & Forestal Districts, of the Albemarle County Code, in subsection
(e) known as the "Keswick Agricultural and Forestal District" by the add of 4 parcels,
totaling 190.872 acs. TM64,Pcls1011 & TMS1,Pctsl5B&15A6. R.ivarma Dist.
ADOPTED the attached ordinance. Mrs. Thomas asked that a follow-up letter be
sent to the landowners expressing the Board's appreciation for putting their land in an
.,agricu[tural/forestal district.
Item No. 14. Public hearing on an Ordinance to amend and reordain Section 2.1-4, of
Chapter 2. i, Agricultural & Forestal Distr/cts, of the Albemarle County Code, in subsection
(g) known as the "Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal District" by the add 4 parcels
totaling 242.38 acs. Designated RA. TNL28, Pclsi2,30,30A&30B. White Hall Dist.
ADOPTED the attached ordinance to reordain the County Code.
ATTACHMENT E
J/
//
FAX (804) 9724126
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Building Code and Zoning Services
401 Mclntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
TELEPHONE (804) 296-5832
TTD (804) 972-4012
MEMORANDUM
ATTACHMENT F
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Eric Morrisette, Senior Planner
Jan Sprinkle, Chief of Zoning Administration ..,~
09/17/99
ZMA 99-09, WCBR
The prior ZMA (97-03) included an application platt that showed three buildings totaling 90,000 square feet
along the Rt. 250 frontage. The conditions of approval stated, "Gross floor area of the professional office
building(s) shall not exceed 15,000 square feet." The Zoning Administrator has determined that to mean the
other 75,000 square feet of buildings are required to be for the exclusive use of Westminster Canterbury of the
Blue Ridge. This amendment is to allow the other 75,000 sf of buildings to be owned and/o/' leased by other
professionals and not to be exclusively used by WCBR. An approval will actually constitute an amendment to
the special use permit for professional offices ia the PRD. (No separate SP application is required under Section
Section 8, Planned Development Districts-Generally says ia part, that the intent of the districts is to promote:
~economical and efficient land use through tmified development; improved levels of amenities; appropriate and
harraonious physical development; creative design; and, a better environment than generally realized through
conventional district regulations." It also states that these districts, "shall be developed: to provide for the
comfort and convenience of residents; to facilitate protection of the character of surrounding neighborhoods;
and to lessen traffic impact through a reasonably short travel time between origins and destinations of persons
living, working, or visiting ia such developments."
With these things in mind, zoning staff opinion is that other health and/or geriatric professionals could occupy
the office buildings if they provide a service to .both WCBR and the Charlottesville-Albemarle community ia
general and be in compliance with the zoning ordinance. This could be made dear by proffers from the
applicants. It would certainly be economical and efficient to use the land for services to WCBR residents. The
creative design and physical development will be reviewed through the site plan process and the _&rchkecmral
Review Board. It would be helpful to make a specific condition that the 60,000 sf center building must have
access from the same level as the pond in front of WCBR as shown on the current appllcadon plan. (Not
necessarily having the builcling built into the hillside, but have a pedestrian "bridge," or au elevator, or some type
of access for WCBR residents.) This would meet the intent of providing for the comfort and convenience of the
residents and protecting the character of the main WCBR complex. In addition, it would lessen traffic impact
since k would invite pedestrians from the main building and cottages and it would decrease vehicular traffic in
the internal WCBR loop road.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Donald D. Sandridge,
Chairman
Arthur G. Kiser
Vice-Chairman
Mr. James L. Brown
Mrs. Robert Bruner
The Rev. Jeffrey Fishwick
Dennis W, Good Jr.
E, Howard Goodwin
Gerald B. Haecket
Thomas C. Lynch
Mrs. CaW N. Moon. Jr
Mrs, Bruce Murray
John A. Owen. Jr.. M.D.
Frank E. Taylor. M.D.
Wendatl L. Winn. Jr.
~r es~minster.
Canrerbu~ of the
Blue Ridge is
firmly committed
to being an advo-
cate for the ekterb
through providing
programs and a
high quality en-
vironment for a
ministry b~, with
and for the aging
persons of the
Charlottesville/
Albemarle area.
Our missmn is to
provide the leader-
ship, resources
and management
necessar'~ to en-
sure a WCBR
community fully
responsive to the
complete and dy-
namic needs of the
aging of our area.
the. Ridge
ATTACHMENT G
OCT 1 5 1999
PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
October 14, 1999
Mr. Wayne Cilimberg
Director of Planning and Community Development
County of Albemarle
401 Mclntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
Re: ZMA 99-09
Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
Dear Mr. Cilimberg:
As Chairman of the Board of Directors of Westminster-Canterbury of
the Blue Ridge, I am writing to express my support for Westminster-
Canterbury's efforts to expand healthcare and other professional services by
way of Martha Jefferson Hospital's construction of additional buildings on the
property facing Route 250 on WCBR's campus.
Both the residents of WCBR and the general public will be well-served
by having additional medical offices available on this side of Charlottesv/lle. As
residents age in place on the WCBR campus, being able to see a physician and
receive other medical services close to home makes life considerably easier.
The blend of medical services and a retirement commumty is a natural one,
and many residents are looking forward to taking advantage of the physical
therapy and exercise/we~",ess ser-,4ces to be offered in the ne;,.-
The partnership between Martha Jefferson Hospital and WCBR is a
beneficial one for all involved. Thank you for your consideration of this
request.
Sincerely,
Donald D. Sandridge
Chairman, Board of Directors
250 PANTOPS MOUNTAIN ROAD CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22911 TELEPHONE (804) 980-9100 FAX (804) 980-9173
A continuing care retirement community related to the Presbyterian and Episcopal churches
ATTACHMENT G
OCT 1 5 1999
of the Blue Ridge PI. NqNING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FOUNDATION
250 PANTOPS MOUNTAIN ROAD, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22911 -- TELEPHONE (804) 980-9286 lAX (804) 980-9285
October 14, 1999
Mr. Wayne Cflimberg
Director of Planning and Community ..Development
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
Dear Mr. Cilimberg:
Re: ZMA 99-09
Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
As Chairman of the Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge Foundation, I am in full
support of the expansion of health care and other professional services which will be provided
in buildings to be cOnstructed on land in front of the residential portion of WCBR. The seniors
who reside at WCBR and others in the community will benefit from the services to be offered
on this property.
The additional medical and professional offices to be available as a result of this project
will make life more pleasant for many people living in this area of the county, and will enhance
the lives of the seniors who make WCBR their home. Being able to visit a therapist, attend
exercise classes, get an x-ray or mammogram, or consult with a doctor so close to home will
truly benefit many older citizens, and will help WCBR meet its mission and commitment to
residents and other seniors in the area.
I ask that you act favorably on this request. Thank you.
Chairman, WCBR Foundation, &
Resident of WCBR
FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MR. EDMU~ND W. MoP. Ris, CHAIRMAN MRS. FREDERIC W. SCOTT. VICE~CHAIRMAN
MR. C. HENRY I-IINNANT III, PRESIDENT MR. EDWIN E. GATEWOOD, JR.
MR. DENNIS W. GOOD, JR. MR. JAMES S. KEaNNAN MR. LEIGH 13. MIDDLEDITCH. JR.
MR. JOSEPH W. RICHMOND, JR. MR. DONALD D. SANDRIDGE
WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF THE BLUE RIDGE IS A NON-PROFIT. CONTINUING CARE RETIREMEaNT COMMUNITY RELATED TO THE PRESBYTERIAN .4aND
EPISCOPAL CHURCHES. THE WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF THE BLUE RIDGE FOUNDATION GATHERS PRIVATE SUPPORT FOR THE CHARITABL£
ACTIVIT[ES OF WESTMINSTER-CAN'rERBURY OF THE BLUE [~IDGE, INCLUDING THE FELLOWSHIP FUND.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Donald D. Sandridge,
Chairman
Arthur G. Kiser
Vice-C,Sairman
Mr. James L. Brown
Mrs. Robert Bruner
The Rev, Jeffrey Fishwick
Dennis W. Good. Jr.
E. Howard Goodwin
Gerald B. Haeckel
Thomas C. ~_ynch
Mrs. CaW N. Moon. Jr.
Mrs. Bruce Murray
~ohn A. Owen, Jr.. M.D.
Frank E. Taylor, M.D.
Wendall L. Winn. Jr.
Westminster-
Canterbury. of the
Blue Ridge ~s
firmly committed
to being an advo-
through providing
programs and a
high quaIity en-
vironment for a
mmistr'~ by, with
and ~br the aging
persons of the
Charlottesville~
Albemarle area.
Our mission is to
provide'r/ne leader-
ship, resources
and management
,qecessar'~ to en-
sure a WCBR
communit'¢ /ully
responsive to the
complete ~nd d~.
rtam~c needs 4 the
a¢ng Of our area.
the/~1~ ~ti/g¢
ATTACHMENT G
OCT 2
PI-AN~ING AND
COMUUNITY DEVELOPMENT
October 14, 1999
Mr. Wayne Cilimberg
Director of Planning and Community Development
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA :~2902-4596
Re: ZMA gg-0g
Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
Dear Mr. Cilimberg:
As a member of the Board of Directors of Westminster-
Canterbury of the Blue Ridge and the WCBR Foundation Board, I wish
to let you know of my support for the construction by Martha Jefferson
Hospital of additional buildings on the property facing Route 250 on
WCBR's campus.
Having additional medical and professional services available on
this side of Charlottesville will not only benefit WCBR residents, but
others living in the vicinity as well. As this part of the County continues
to grow, a development such as this is forward-looking and will serve
the community well into the future.
Many residents are looking forward to. being' able to have
physical therapy, mammogram, and wellness services close by, and we
believe that residents' lives will be greatly enhanced by the proximity of
these services.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely, ~
' ~EdwinE.oatew~,odt Jr.
Member, Board of~l~irectors
250 PANTOPS MOUNTAIN ROAD. CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22911 TELEPHONE ['804) 980-9100 FAX (804) gs0-g173
A continuing care retirement commumty related to the Presbyterian and Episcopal cnurcnes
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Oonatc D. Sandridge,
Chairman
Arthur G. Kiser
Vice-Chairman
Mr. James L. Brown
Mrs. Robert Bruner
The Rev. Jeffrey Fishwick
Dennis w Good, Jr.
E. Howard Goodwin
Gerald B. Haeckel
Thomas C. Lynch
Mrs. Can/N Moon. Jr.
Mrs. Bruce Murray
John A. Owen. Jr. M.D.
Frank E. Taylor, M.D.
Wendall L. Winn, Jr.
Westminster-
Canterbury of the
Blue Ridge is
firmly committed
to being an advo-
cate for the elderly
through providing
programs and a
high quality en-
wronment for a
mimstry by, with
and for the aging
persons of the
Charlottesville/
Albemarle area.
Our mission is to
provide the leader-
ship, resources
and management
necessar'q to eh-
sure a WCBR
community fully
responsive ro the
complete and dy-
nam~c needs of the
aging of our area.
the ~1~ ~idge
ATTACHMENT G
OCT z ~ !~gg
PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
October 15, 1999
Mr. Wayne Cilimberg
Director of Planning and Community Development
County of Albemarle
401 McL'~tire Road
Charlottesville, VA 2~902-4596
Re: ZMA 99-09
Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
Dear Mr. Cilirnberg:
As a member of the Board of Directors of Westminster-Canterbury of
the Blue Ridge, I am in full support of Westminster-Canterbury's desire to
partner with Martha Jefferson Hospital for the construction of additional
health care and other professional office space on the property in front of
WCBR on Route 250.
The relationship between WCBR and Martha Jefferson Hospital is a
very beneficial one, both to residents of the retirement community and to the
public, especially those living on the east side of Charlottesville. We are
looking forward to the additional services, including therapies and wellness
services, which the new construction will offer.
I ask that you grant this request and allow WCBR to enhance its
delivery of health care to seniors in this area.
Sincerely,
E. Howard~6'odwin
Board/,ofDirectors
250 PANTOPS MOUNTAIN ROAD. CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22911 TELEPHONE (804) 980-9100 FAX (804) 980-9173
A continuing care retirement community related to the Presbyterian and E[~iscopat churches
.4LBE3L4RLE COU. VTY CODE
ATTACHMENT H
CHAPTER 18
ZONING
SECTION 8
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS - GENERALLY
Sections:
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.5.1
8.5.2
8.$.3
8.5.4
8.5.5
3.5.6
8.5.6.1
8.5.6.2
8.5.6.3
8.5.6.4
8.5.6.5
INTENT
RELATION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO GENERAL
ZONING. SUBDIVISION OR OTHER REGULATIONS
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DEFINED
WHERE PE~i~,~ ~ ~ ko
oROCEDURES FOR PD APPLICATIONS
APPLICATIONS. MATERIALS TO BE SUBMITTED
r LANNiNG COMMISSION PROCEDURES
PREAPPLICATION Cot~ r ~£NCES
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS
ACTION BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAINS AND SUBDIVISION PLATS
CONTENTS OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS: SUBDIVISION PLATS
APPROVAL OF SITE D~X~ELOPMENT PLANS: SUBDIVISION PLATS
VARIATIONS FROM APPROVED APPLICATION PLANS
BUILDING PERMITS. GRADING PERMITS
SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN PD DISTRICTS
8.1INTENT
Planned development districts are intended to provide for variety, and flexibilits.' in design
necessary, to implement the varied goals and objectives of the counD' as set forth in the
comprehensive plan. Through a planned development approach, these special regulations are
intended to accomplish the purposes of zoning and other applicable regulations ro the same extent
as regulations of conventional districts. In addition, planned development regulations are intended
to pr~mote:~'['onomical and efficient land use through unified development: improved levels of.
amenities: appropriate and harmonious physical development: creative design: and a better
environment than generally realized through conventional district regulations..~ In view of the
substantial public advantages of planned development, these regulations are intended ro encourage
the planned development approach in areas appropriate ~, terms of location and character.
Planned development districts shall be developed: ~o provide for the comfort and convemence of
residents: to facilitate protection of' the character of surrounding nei,,hborhoods: and to lessen
traffic impact through a reasonably short travel time between origins and destinations of [~ersons
living, working, or visiting tn such deveiopments~ }-lousing. commercial and service facilities, and
places of' employment shall be related either by physical proximi .ty or by adequate street networks
so as to promote these objecuves.
18-8-1
MA''THEWS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. LLC
real estate develooment · consu~t~na · oro ecr management
ATTACHMENT I
29 October 1999
Mr. Eric Morrisette, AlCP
Senior Planner
County of Albemarle Planning Department
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
PLANNING AND
CO~UNITY DEV[LOP~ENT
ZMA 99-09
Westminster Canterbury. of the Blue Ridge
Dear Eric,
We would like to fomally request a waiver to permit grading in areas of critical slopes
as outlined on the plan submitted to you office yesterday. The critical slopes are located
at the toe of the slope between the subject property and Westminster Canterburfs roam
campus (above this site), and also at the southwest corner of the site at Route 250.
These areas are man-made critical slopes and disturbance is necessary to accommodate
parking and ancillary needs such as utilities/service. Note that a sewer line already
exists in the steep slope behind the planned buildings, as this slope has been disturbed
in the past. We believe our disturbance will be of no significant impact, and of course,
all work would be subject to approval by County staff in their review of any future site
plans. Since we axe presently in the ZMA process and are aware of the need to grade in
these areas, we felt it appropriate and expeditious to seek this waiver from the Planning
Commission concurrently with their review of the ZMA.
Please advise if you have any concerns with our request, or require any additional
information,
With best regards,
MATTHEWS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC
/
Michael R. Matthews, Jr. C
MRM/st
cc: Mr. C. Henry Hinnant, WCBR
One Boar's Head Pointe
Charlottesville. Virginia 22903
804 972 7764 phone
804 295 3203
mtkemt,, matmewsdcvelop.com
ATTACHMENT J
W:~-Znster-Caaterbury of. the Blue Ridge is Fu-mly ¢ornmi~ed
d~c~te for ~e elderly t~h provid~g
en~o~t ~r a ~ by, ~, ~ ~or ~e agog pe~ o~ the
Our m/ssion is ~o provide f.he leadership, resources, am, d mar~gement necessary to
ensure a WCBR communi~ bally responsive to the corn~Iete and ciy~amic ne.~ts of
~he agin~ of our area.
EstabZishing and operating bourn'rig and health care f~'titias
structure a~ a mission of the
Prorgding life-care for WCBR residertt~ and the se~'uri~d, indeFtndence, and personal
digni~ fostered by such car~.
Offering financq~d aid through tim Fdlawship Fund in or~r to ~t~d ~,~ ~o ~
m~ ol~r p~ ~ p~l~ ~ ~ n~ fi~~y i~en~t and ~ ~sure
~ts of ~n~d mre ~r t~ ~. (A ~~ng a~ a~~e ~ r~fng
Ensuring that, throughout ali its op~zt/ans, /2' ~s ~sed upon a solid financial
fvundaticrn w-i~ on-g~ing and eriti~lly e'aaluated pro~e~ons of fumr~ need~.
U~ng its co~t,~d~t and mis~n ]ointty and in ct~se ~operation with the
Virginia Diocesan Hames, thc. and tl'~ W~ter Presbyterian Hom~, I~c. and
SdOJ. NVd - NO$1:l.qdd:ll" YHJ. UYRI !~
ATTACHMENT K
ATTACHMENT I.,
Dept.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
of Planning & Community Development
401 Mclnlire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 2290:2-4596
(804) 296-5823
Mar. ch 5, 1998
Matt Wood
Brinkman MDC
210 East High St
Chrtottesville, VA 22902
ARB-P(SDP)-98-04 Martha Jefferson Hospital
Tax Map 78, Parcel 55A
Dear Mr. Wood:
The Architectural Review Board, at its meeting on March 2, 1998, reviewed a preliminary plan
for the above-referenced project. The following comments were made for the benefit of the
applicant's final submission:
A perspective view of the proposed building would be useful and would help clarify the
relationship of the drop-offto the overall building. A perspective view or views should
be provided for the final Certificate of Appropriateness review.
Side elevations should not incorporate large expanses of blank wall. Elevations should
be provided.
The phase one building will set the standard for future phases. Inclusion of the-cupola in
the final building design may present problems for future building phases.
The ARB noted the concern of the Zoning Department over the connectivity between the
proposed development and the existing WCBR development, and expressed a desire that
all phases of the development should work together, and with the existing development.
The ARB clarified its concern that the ARB process should be respected throughout the
zoning process, and indicated that its review of the phase one building would not lock the
Board into any particular layout for future phases.
Page 2
March 5, 1998
ATTACHMENT I-
Landscaping will be an important component of the overall design, particularly considering
the Board's early concern that the development should be sensitive to the existing natural
landscape. Significant plantings will be required in the parking area. Complete landscaping
information, including a map and key identifying species, size, location, number, and
required spacing should be submitted for the final review. Trees along the Entrance
Corridor should be located at least 35 feet on center. Trees along interior roads should be
located at least 40 feet on center. Other requirements are outlined in the ARB Design
Guideline manual.
Information on site lighting, in.c. luding fixture type and location, manufacturer's cut sheets
showing that the light will be shielded and directed down onto the sight, and a
photometric plan indicating that spillover does not exceed .5 fc should be submitted for
the final review.
Samples of all building materials and colors should be submitted for the final review,
Ifyou have any questions or comments regarding the above-noted action, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely,
Margaret Pickart
Design Planner
Ml'/jcf
cc**
Westminster Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
Daggett & Grigg Architects
December 1, 1999
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 - 5823
Fax (804) 972 - 4035
Preston Stallings
P O Box 6249
Charlottesville, VA 22906
ZMA-99-11 Clover Lawn Farm
Tax Map 56, Parcel 107
Dear Mr. Stallings:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on November 23, 1999, by a vote of
5-1, recommended denial of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and
receive public comment at their meeting on December 8~ 1999. Any new or additional
information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Elaine K. Echols, AICP
Senior Planner
EKE/jcf
/
Cc: 'Cia Carey
Jack Kelsey
Amelia McCulley
Steve Allshouse
Bob Ball
PROFFER FORM
Original Proffer
Amended Proffer
(Amendment #
Tax Map Parcel(s)
~o./~5' Acres to be rezoned from l'~- ( to i~" (g ·
Pursuant to Section 33.3 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance, the owner, or
its duly authorized agent, hereby voluntarily proffers the conditions listed below which shall
be applied to the property, if rezoned. These conditions are proffered as a part of the
requested rezoning and it is agreed that: (1) the rezoning itself gives rise to the need for
the conditions; and (2) such conditions have a reasonable relation to the rezoning
requested.
(1) A 5ft wide concrete sidewalk or asphalt path will be shown on the site plan for
development of the property and constructed to provide pedestrian access from
the residential units in the development to Route 250 where the entrance aligns
with the proposed commercial entrance on Parcel 56-107A.
(2) This development will be included in a site plan which will cover the development
plans for the adjacent Parcels 56-107A and 107A1. This site plan will be
reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board for consistency with
architectural elements.
(3) Vehicular access will be provided via a joint entrance to Route 250 on a recorded
access easement with Parcel 56-107A, as shown on Attachment B.
(4) Vehicular access and pedestrian access will be allowed through this
development to the adjoining Parcel 56-97A1.
(5) A minimum of 4,000 sf of usable open space at a grade not to exceed 5% for
passive recreation will be-provided for this development.
[..~g~r~s (if A~I OwFi~rs" ..... /
Printed Names of All Owners
OR
Signature of Attorney-in-Fact
{Attach Proper Power of Attorney)
Printed Name of Attorney-in-Fact
PROFFORM.WPD
Rev. December 1994
S~qday D. ecember 05, 1999 12:43 PM JO HIGGINS 804 8231720 p.01
PRO TECT DE VEL OPMEN T LIA4I TED L.
SADDLE ONE FAAM
Z463 Browns 6ap Turnpike, Cville VA Z2901
(80~) 823 - ~EZ4 F~ 823 - 17~0
P~=r 9Z3 - 59~ ~11 pho~ (8~) 2~2 - 3080
Fox T nsmit, l bA~: 4 ~~r 1999
To: ChaHo~e ~mphris F~ ~ Z96 - 58.00
C~rl~ Matin F~ ~ 9~ - 0696
~vid ~we~m~n F~ ~ 973 - 030Z
~1~ ~o~s F~ ~ Z96 - 0067
Fo~ ~rshall F~ ~ Z93 - 41Z0
Walte~ Perkins F~ Z96 - 58~
Cc: P~eston Stallings ~ 295 - 0104
F~om: ,~ ~To. Higgins
Re: Clover L~_wn Village ZMA 99-1:L
~ am contactin~j you with ~a~c/to tl~ Clove" Law~ Vil~ r~o~i9 r~st.
_T ~m' available at you~ convenienc~ Please call me at 825 - 1224 or pu~ ma a~
pZ$-§P77 (e~ter ~uml~r and push # key) and 2' will call you back.
look £oeward to hear'iq9 £~om you. Thanks/
Sunday, December 05, 1999 12:43 PM JO HIGGINS 804 8231720 p.02
To: Sally Thomas, Charlotte Humphris, David Bowerman:
Although my small address doesnt give you a hiM, this is Jo I-iggins. I am wo~ng with Preston Stallings to aseistllt him
through the rezonlng, site plan, and consttuofion phase ofthi$ de~alopment
I am contacting you with ragaKI to the Clover Lawn Village Rezoning on your next board agenda.
Subsequent to the PC action, the prohr (number 2) that seemed at that time to be a sigr~icant stumbling block has been
revised. The revised l~;4br In. dos for the diwsiopment to beilNcluded in.a site plan with thetwo adjacent I-lC parcels. With
this Ixo~iorL the site plan review and approad process should pro~e the ledel ofecrutiW necessa[y to insure this
develolnTrsnt i~.cehoske-atld consistent with the adjacent commercial devsiolxnent as apprepflate.
Although Staff has recommended approval ofthis request, t would like to address the 3 tame (page 7 ofyour package) that
staff has identiled which are unfa.axadis to this request.
~ -"No desigrt of the parcel is proposed to ess.ss ~ationshipe to surrounding propefl~es and the new commercial
de~opmer~ a~mss the strut",
RESPONSE: The proffer number 2 as re~sed since the PC a~tion will a i~ciloelly prmicl~ the site pisn re~ew and ;pprmal
process. This process will enabis the staff and developer to wori( through the speci~c detailed layout issues to ostablish the
There was one peteiYl:lai item of concam t~ me with re~:~ot to the pedestrian "~on' to the cle~opment across the
street, Although this sounds simple enough, the street we are re~rring to is RT 250. My experience in getting SUPl~rt fronl
VDOT on pedestrian ;msein~ ha~ not ~ pesitlus. Placing · pathway that at,ds at the RT 250 ~ght of way may be a
lial=lllty issue. VDOT has not allowed crosswalks eXCel* for extreme aituation~ (such as schools) for the reason that a cross
walk ps.ides an 'allusion ofsafetY' for the pedestrian entering ~ght alway.
2. 'Limited amenities kx the housing devebfa~nt are planned. These amenities include a small area of usable open space
and patM connecting developments."
RESPONSE: Originally, tho ixoffem did not include recreation area, When ;~ieeing howthis cteaek)pment tls with the
Comlorehemive Plan items which include the Community Facilities Plan, it seemed reasonable to rely on tho signitcant
Pallts/Recrestlon/~choots facility that is within 5 minutes oft. his deveto~- As one of the largest ~omplexs in the County,
the Crozat c, ommunRY does rely on the rec~ation u~es pro. ed at WAH$, Browlls~ille, aM Henley. ~ open space, play
ields, child gym type area, and running track etc. proNicis for this aspect. Since the Ca;iisi Imprmernent$ Progtarn ]ustlles
the expenditure of funds for providing a "community faulty" it seems a~e for a development within the community to
rely on this aspect. Othen~a, it seems to diminish the justitcation fo; creating "true" Commun'~y Facilities. The minimal
recreation space that was proffered is for passive use - a place to mad a book ~ enjoy the Niews.
3. "Wttix~ a prottlt~ design, on~j the deaelopmnnt as it appears tom an Entrance Conidor ca~t be essesad at tine time of
site plan rekiew"
RESPONSE: i nsecl to talk to Elaine Echols on this eM. Tt~is can be taken a cou~s ways. First of ail, the entire parcnl is
Ndewed from RT250 - efltronce r, ontdor, So I am net sure the "on~ ... as it eppeam" wouki apl~j in this case. The specific
requirements that al:~Y to the Site Plato development process ~uld seem to be appmptntaly restflcthe for this case. If you
take this as "without a ~ed design" being tM requirements issue. I will add[ess that.
One reason, a plan was not ixoll~red is that generally speaking, this Is not a very corr~ex pamel to develop, it is Z65 ac[es
which is almost square with rolling terrain and no trees. With the access entrance set (attar severdl meetings with VI:X:)T) aM
the potential intetconflect to trd parcel behind the Lodge, the treedways will mandate thc hlyout ofthe housing units.
Submitting a plan for a smell parcel when it is to be cornl:ined with the adjacent parcsis in a untied plan, san tend to be
redundant ~ adds algniicext cost to the preiminary phase of this devalopment. From the Ndew~nt o~tM ~leqeioper who
has.to add tho cost to the intl~idual paresis, it becomes Nmy diflcuit to oonstrdo4 an e~i txoduct that is marketable, in this
ease, theea is a small number cd'lots to spread the cost. The second reason was that if a plan was ~ that did not
include the HC pamela - it would be Mewed unfavorably because it would o~ly bec piece oftbe overall development. So we
would be bacl~ to tho scenmio of Site Plan with 3 lanroeb in~tuded which is the ixehr before you now. (ln addition, it was
discussed sedy on in "preapplicatton" stage that if joined tfl this request the ~ to ANY commemlal de~4~nt may
oppose this rezoner BECAUSE the HC was included,)
I would mr~ much apix~iata a few minutes of your time to have feedback from you lndi¥1duaily. -timing is also an issue.
When this request was sul:m-itted on August 2Srd, it m intended to allow for more than one PC meeting il'issuss required
and still be before the Board in De;ember. Unf~tunMety, the fret notice that was sent out to the adjacent pml=eAY ownms for
tho PC meeting went to the wrong people so it was postpoced to the subsequent PC meeting. We are now scheduled to go
Sunday, December 05= 1999 12:43 PM
JO HIGGINS 804 8231720
bebre the BOS and would like to proceed to the Site Pla~ precess with the entire development.
early summer 2000 constructien start.
We respectfully request your suppo¢( for this request.
~Please conJirm that you re(;eived this small. )
p.03
'~his will allow a possible
Design Workshop Report · Ma~ 16.
!/
· An urban neighborhood
or community the size of
Pantops or Crozet can
have multiple centers,
each defined by the limits
of a five minute walk.
CHK Architects and Planners, loc., Dodson Associates, McGuire Woods Battle and Boothe, LLE Center for Watershed Protection Group Repons
D¢$i~:n V~rk.~hop R~porl · May I~. I ~8
· Preserve and enhance
beauty of Crozet.
Strengthen existing town
b. Mixed.use Core
c. Services / work
places within a
walkable area.
· Provide opportunities
for community by rein.
forcing its heart.
CHK Architects and Planners. Inc., Dodson Associates, McGuire Woods Battle and Boothe. LLR Center for Watershed Protection Group Reports
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
ELAINE K. ECHOLS, AICP
NOVEMBER 23, 1999
DECEMBER 8, 1999
ZMA 99-11 Clover Lawn Village Revised December 1, 1999 .
Applicant's Proposal: Preston Stallings has requested a rezoning of a 2.65-acre parcel in
Crozet from R-1 to R-6. Five proffers are offered with the request (See Attachment A):
A 5 fl wide concrete sidewalk or asphalt path will be shown on the site plan plat for
development of the property and constructed to provide pedestrian access from the residential
units in the development to Route 250 where the entrance aligns with the proposed
commercial entrance on Parcel 56-107A.
o
This development will be included on a site plan which will cover the development plans for
the adjacent Parcels 56 - 107A and 107Al. The Architectural Review Board will review the
site plan for consistency with architectural elements.
3. Vehicular access will be provided via a joint entrance to Route 250 on a recorded access
easement with Parcel 56-107A, as shown on Attachment B.
4. Vehicular and pedestrian will be provided through this development to the adjoining Parcel,
56 97-A1.
5. ,,t minimum of 4,000 s.fi of usable open space at a grade not to exceed 5% for passive
recreation will be provided for this development.
A drawing is provided with this staffreport; however, the drawing is conceptual and is not
proffered as a plan. It was provided to the staff as an indication of the type of development,
which could possibly take place on the parcel (See Attachments B & C).
Petition for Rezoning: The petition is to rezone 2.65 acres from R-1 to R-6 with five proffers.
No proposed use or development is proffered. Described as Tax Map 56 Parcels 107, the
property is located in the White Hall Magisterial District on Rockfish Gap Turnpike [Route 250
West], between the Masonic Lodge and a gasoline station building, across the street from the
Blue Ridge Builders Supply at 5221 Rockfish Gap Turnpike. The Comprehensive Plan
designates this property as Neighborhood Density Residential, recommended for 3 - 6 dwelling
units per acre in the Community of Crozet. (See Attachments D.) The property is located within
an Entrance Corridor.
Character of the Area: The area surrounding the property is low-density residential, low
intensity commercial, civic, and undeveloped. A commercial center of about 49,000 square feet,
including a grocery store is proposed across the street from the parcel. Blue Ridge Builders
Supply is also located across the street from this site.
Zoning History - There is no zoning history for the parcel.
By-right Use of the Property: With a zoning classification of R-l, the property could be
developed residentially with 2 dwelling units. With bonuses for environmental preservation and
provision of loW-to-moderate income housing, density could be 3 dwelling units.
Specifics on the Proposal: Two conceptual drawings (Attachments B & C) accompany this
proposal. Attachment B indicates "shared access" to the property, which is proffered.
Attachment C shows development potential with duplexes and triplexes.
Pedestrian access is shown on the drawing, and it is proffered to be provided from the adjoining
property, Tax Map 56 Parcel 97A1, through this parcel proposed for rezoning, to the shared
entrance and to the adjoining property, Parcel 107A. Parcels 107A and 107Al are anticipated to
be redeveloped commercially. The applicant has proffered to develop all three parcels together,
show them on one site plan, and have the Architectural Review Board (ARB) review
development on three parcels. Architectural review would be mandatory on the commercial
sites. It w. ould also be mandatory on any site plan in this Entrance Corridor. The advantage here
is that development for all three properties would be shown on a single plan.
The proffer for access to be provided to the adjoining parcel, TMP 56-97A1, sets up an internal
road network for a 6 acre area surrounding this parcel. If the driveway or road were set up
according to the drawing provided, and if the property were to be subdivided in the future, the
Planning Commission would have to consider private road approval for the development.
Four thousand (4,000) square feet of open space for passive recreation use is proffered for this
development. Additional landscaped areas and areas for stormwater management will be
provided for the development; however, they will not be identified until a site plan is submitted
for the property. In a PRD or PUD, 25% open space would be required. Open space proffered
for passive recreational use for this development equals approximately 3. 5%.
Applicant's Justification for the Request: The applicant's justification for the rezoning request
is provided in Attachment E. The applicant believes the rezoning is justified for the following
reasons:
·
·
The property is in a Development Area
The rezoning will assist in the CoUnty's effort to encourage greater utilization of
land in the Development Areas by providing higher gross densities
The rezoning will provide the opportunity for compact and high-density housing.
The property is located near a Food Lion
The land fronts Route 250 East
RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed the proposal for conformity with the
Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance and recommends approval of this rezoning.
Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan shows this area to be Neighborhood Density,
recommended for 3 - 6 dwelling units per acre. In terms of density provided, this proposal would
meet the recommended density requirement.
Land Use Standards for Designated Development Areas (General Land Use Standards pp. 20
- 22)
Development should be concentrated and clustered to protect environmental features. The site is
a gently rolling grassy field with no steep slopes, streams, or trees; therefore, there are no
environmental features to cluster around or protect.
Existing forested areas acting as buffers between subdivisions should be maintained. There are
no existing forested areas on the site.
Limiting access points should minimize the impact of development on major roads. Shared access
to the commercial properties to the east is proffered. By proffering a connection to the property
to the west, access for this development and others will be limited.
A sense of community should be maximized by providing connections between developments;
such connections may provide for additional recreational facilities, increased open space area,
bicycle/pedestrian links, improved public transit, emergency access, and access to schools,
parks, and other public facilities. Joint pedestrian and vehicular connections are shown to
adjoining properties. A small amount of"usable" open space is provided with this plan.
Underground utilities should be provided in new developments. The subdivision ordinance
requires that underground utilities be provided.
Features to prevent impact from impervious surfaces on water quality should be provided. A
stormwater management/bmp area is shown on the parcel at the front of the lot which appears to
be satisfactory.
Building orientation should be to public streets; parking areas do not need to be located
exclusively in front of buildings. No proffers regarding design are made for the development and
the conceptual plan shows buildings in the rear of the parcel rather than the front of the parcel.
The proffer for architectural review ensures that the ARB will review a site plan for development
here.
Where site illumination is proposed, down-directed and shielded lights should be used. This
proposal does not show any lighting; however lighting provided at the site plan phase will need
to meet the County's new lighting ordinance requirements.
Historic buildings should be adaptively reused. There are no historic buildings on the site.
The phasing of developments should match service and infrastructure availability and capacity.
Water and sewer capacity is available and Rockfish Gap Turnpike/Route 250 can support traffic
anticipated by the development.
Overall development density should be as high a level as is practical. The Land Use Plan
suggests 3 - 6 dwelling units per acre. The applicant could provide density at 6 dwelling units
per acre, potentially.
3
The integrity of adjacent residential areas should be maintained through use of buffering,
screening, and separation of adjacent non-residential uses. No landscaping is proposed
between the adjoining low-density residential uses and this development; however, it is unknown
what types of landscaping and screening needs might exist for the development. In the absence
of commitment to a particular design, additional landscaping and screening needs cannot be
assessed.
Developments should be designed with an internal orientation to foster a sense of place and
avoid the image of continuous suburban sprawl. No design of the property is proposed, so there
is no way to assess whether or not an internal orientation will be provided. There are
opportunities for the applicant to master plan the development of a larger area, since the owner
has control over the two adjoining parcels to the east (TMP 56 - 97A and 56 -107Al, with
approximately 2 acres each). The owner of the adjoining parcels, 56 - 97A and 97A1 has
suggested that a unified development plan is needed for the whole general area that provides for
centralized access for all 5 properties. Combined, Lots 97A, 97A1, 107, 107A, and 107 A1
contain 13.7 acres. Staff expressed a concern for the random development of each of the small
parcels individually without a unified planning approach. Staffalso told the applicant that it is
difficult to assess the impact to the Entrance Corridor and this emerging activity center with a
new development at this location.
Rather than provide a unified plan for the development, the applicant has proffered joint
vehicular access, proffered to provide pedestrian access through the site, and proffered
architectural review of a unified site plan by the ARB for the three parcels owned by the
applicant. Many, but not all, of the concerns of the staff are addressed through this proffer and
over 6 acres of the 13.7 have potential for development in a "unified" fashion. The other 5.12
acres contain a large house with recreational area whose future development will have to be
addressed in a different venue.
Provisions should be made for innovative design that reduces housing costs. The provision of R-
6 zoning at this location provides options for detached single family dwellings, duplexes,
triplexes, quadruplexes, townhouses, atrium houses, patio houses, attached housing, and garden
apartments. No commitments are made with this rezoning for any specific housing type.
Development of a private road to support housing on individual lots (townhouses, detached, and
attached housing), would have to be approved at a later date by the Planning Commission. A
driveway for apartments, duplexes or triplexes would not need Planning Commission approval. It
would appear from the driveway shown on the conceptual plan that a public road could not be
provided here because of the turning radius needed to serve this small parcel.
Lot design and residential layout should be based on a rational use of land that reflects
topographic and other physical features rather than massive grading to eliminate or counteract
those features. No lot design is shown; however, there are no physical features that create design
constraints.
Specific Standards for Residen tiai, Commercial and Industrial Land Uses (Residential
Densities and Relationships to Other Land Uses; Residential Development Design, pp. 22-23)
4
In rezoning deliberations, the county should be mindful of the intent to encourage infill
development, contain most future growth within the designated Development Areas, and avoid
rural development pressure. Unless contrary to matters of public health and safety, residential
rezoning to the upper end of the Comprehensive Plan recommended land use density ranges
should be favored even if the density exceeds that of surrounding developments. In this rezoning,
the density is within the range proposed by the Comprehensive Plan.
Maintenance of the integrity of residential areas should be accomplished using buffering,
screening, and physical separation of adjacent nonresidential uses. The integrity of existing
residential areas may be enhanced through the increased use of landscaping and between single
family and multi-family uses. The relationship of the proposed residential area to the adjoining
commercial area is unknown with this application. The applicant chose to provide information
only on the residential property in an effort to prevent additional conditions from being imposed
on the adjoining HC property through a rezoning.
For larger developments, layout and design should provide for varying building orientation and
setback, dwelling unit type, fa9ade treatment, and lot size to avoid repetitiveness. Open space
should be employed as a design feature to establish and define smaller neighborhood areas
within the larger developments. The PRD/PUD approach is particularly applicable for larger
developments. The development is too small to qualify for PRD/PUD status; however, if
combined for ownership or development with adjoining parcels, a planned infill development
presents many more possibilities in terms of density, mixed use, lot layout, open space,
connectivity, and pedestrian access.
Land Use Designation (Residential Land use pp. 25 - 26)
· Neighborhood density residential areas should have a gross density of between 3 - 6
dwellings per acre. This development would have potential for a gross density of 6 dwelling
units per acre.
· Neighborhood density residential areas are intended to accommodate all dwelling types.
This development would accommodate any dwelling type.
· Any new development within an existing subdivision is to be in keeping with the character
and density of the existing development. New developments adjacent to existing subdivisions
are to be developed at higher densities to support infill development efforts. This
development is proposed at a higher density than nearby subdivisions.
Crozet Community Study (Pages 44 and 49)
Employ innovative housing design and site planning techniques in housing development that
minimizes the amount of impervious surfaces. No housing design has been offered nor has a
plan been provided to assess the amount of impervious surfaces. The design shown by the
applicant could possibly be altered to provide parking in a different way that eliminates the
"parking lot" focus for 15 dwelling units sharing centralized parking. A central "green
feature" rather than a central parking lot could provide for a more innovative design of the
development. It is hoped that the Architectural Review Board will suggest alternatives that
minimize the visual impact of the parking lot on the corridor and the development itself.
Provide open space and protect natural features. Usable open space for passive recreation
has been provided for the development. Steep slopes, woodlands, wetlands, and streams are
not present on this parcel.
Provide neighborhood activity centers within convenient walking distance to new housing.
The emerging activity center will be the commercial complex across th~ street from the
development. The applicant will provide pedestrian access to this center from the
development.
Sidewalks should be located in areas of dense residential development. Pathways are
provided for this development.
Sidewalks should be located in areas connecting residential to office or commercial zone.
Staff suggested that the applicant provide a sidewalk across the frontage of Route 250 as a
pedestrian connection that would allow for access at the front of the parcel to the crossing to
the shopping center. The applicant declined to proffer this improvement because of the lack
of other sidewalks on Route 250, the unknown status of future road improvements, and the
location of utilities in the r.o.w. Alternatively, the applicant is providing for pedestrian
access through the site which could ultimately Connect Cory Farm to the commercial center
via a pathway. Sidewalks on the Development Area side of Route 250 will likely be
recommended with future road improvements to Route 250.
STAFF COMMENT
Relationship between the application and the purpose and intent of the requested zoning
district
The purpose and intent of the R-6 Zoning District is to provide for medium-density residential
development; permit a variety of housing types, provide incentives for clustering of development
and provide locational, environmental and developmental amenities. This development has the
potential to provide medium-density development and housing types other than single family
detached. There are no incentives in this development for clustering development and the
applicant is providing only the development amenities of a path to the adjoining properties.
Public need and |ustification for the change
The Comprehensive Plan promotes infill development in the designated neighborhoods,
communities, and the Village of Rivanna. It further describes characteristics which new
developments should have. Housing demands in the community are to be filled in the
Development Areas. This property is suggested for housing development with a density of 3 - 6
dwelling units per acre. As indicated above, the rezoning proposal contains some but not all of
the characteristics recommended in the Comprehensive Plan.
Anticipated impact on public facilities and services
Transportation - Principal access to the property will be from Route 250 which is Rockfish
Gap Turnpike tlu'ough the adjoining property. Engineering has approved this entrance
because it lines up with the entrance to the commercial center across the street. Access to the
adjoining parcel to the northwest has also been accommodated. Ultimate approval will be
needed by V-DOT; however, it appears that the entrance is appropriately located.
Schools - With 15 new dwelling units, additional 6 students would be added to Albemarle
public schools. Three new students would be put in Brownsville Elementary; 2 new students
would go to Henley Middle School; and 3 new students would go to Western Albemarle. All
three of these schools are below capacity and can support the additional students.
Water and Sewer: Public water and sewer would be extended to the property. No location or
capacity issues are known at this time. No know fire flow problems exist.
Stormwater Management: The property drains towards Rockfish Gap Turnpike. The
applicant has shown facilities in the front of the property.
Fiscal impact to public facilities: The County has reviewed the anticipated fiscal impacts
and that analysis is provided in Attachment F.
Anticipated impact on natural, cultural, and historic resources - No impact is anticipated on
natural, cultural, or historical resources of the County.
SUMMARY
Staff has identified the following factors, which are favorable to this request:
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
The rezoning would allow for higher density housing at this location than other housing
in the area.
The density is in keeping with the upper end of the density recommended in the Land Use
Plan.
Opportunities for housing types other than single family detached are made available.
No disturbance of environmental features would take place with development of the
property.
Pedestrian access will be provided through this property to two adjoining properties.
Joint access is provided to serve two proP'erties and additional access is provided to a
third property.
The property will be reviewed as a unified site plan by the ARB in conjunction with the
to ensure consistency with Entrance Corridor standards.
Staff has identified the following factors, which are unfavorable to this request:
No design of the parcel is proposed to assess relationships to surrounding properties and
the new commercial development across the street
Limited amenities for the housing development are planned. These amenities include a
small area of usable open space and paths connecting developments.
IFithout a proffered design, only the development as it appears from an Entrance
Corridor can be assessed at the time of site plan review.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
This rezoning is proposed as a small unobtrusive high-density project along Rockfish Gap
Turnpike. Though the parcel has few design constraints, a design of the parcel that shows how a
development could meet the Comprehensive Plan goals, is preferred over a straight rezoning.
Historically, the County has accepted written proffers in lieu of plans for development on
rezonings of this type and, as a result of past policy, would recommend approval of this
rezoning with the proffers made. The Planning Commission did not recommend approval of
this rezoning based on the need for a proffered plan for design, lack of a mixed use
component for the development; and insufficient usable open space. Several Planning
Commisioners said that, at a minimum, a proffer guaranteeing submittal o fa unified site plan
for the subject parcel and Parcels 56-107A and 107A1 was needed. The applicant has
proffered a unified site plan for the three parcels. Staff looks to the Board for guidance on the
future rezonings with small acreages to develop recommendations for the Planning
Commission and to advise future applicants on the expectations of the County.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Proffers dated 11/30/99
B - Proffered Entrance Configuration dated 11/4/99
C - Concept Plan dated 11/4/99
D -Tax Parcel Map
E--Applicant's Justification
F - Fiscal Impact Analysis
PROFFER FORM
~'~-//' Tax Map Parcel(s) #
Original Proffer
Amended Proffer
(Amendment #
ATTACHMENT
,.3. ~ ~' Acres to be rezoned from fi'" ( to ~-{¢
Pursuant to Section 33.3 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance, the owner, or
its duly authorized agent, hereby voluntarily proffers the conditions listed below which shall
be applied to the property, if rezoned. These conditions are proffered as a part of the
requested rezoning and it is agreed that: (1) the rezoning itself gives dse to the need for
the conditions; and (2) such conditions have a reasonable relation to the rezoning
requested.
(1) A 5ft wide concrete sidewalk or asphalt path will be shown on the site plan for
development of the property and constructed to provide pedestrian access from
the residential units in the development to Route 250 where the entrance aligns
with the proposed commercial entrance on Parcel 56-107A.
(2) This development will be included in a site plan which will cover the development
plans for the adjacent Parcels 56-107A and 107A1. This site plan will be
reviewed by the Architectural Review Board for consistency with architectural
elements.
(3) Vehicular access will be provided via a joint entrance to Route 250 on a recorded
access easement with Parcel 56-107A, as shown on Attachment B.
(4) Vehicular access and pedestrian access will be allowed through this
development to the adjoining Parcel 56-97A1.
(5) A minimum of 4,000 sf of usable open space at.a grade not to exceed 5% for
passive recreation will be provided for this development.
~3'wner~'"-~'~'"'~'~- 7 ~l:ir~ted Names ofOA~ Owners
Date
OR
Signature of Attorney-in-Fact
(Attach Proper Power of Attorney)
Printed Name of Attorney-in-Fact
PROFFORMWPD
Rev. December 1994
/
/
/
/
/
/
DH C + (IlS 91,--..
099 --
/ //
/
ALBEMARLE
40
COUNTY
ATTACHMENT D
/
~! O.
~4
'ZMA-99-
$3
'x
\
,~oec [
\
WHITE HALL
DISTRICT
/
/
II1!
II1
SECTION 56
ATTACHMENT E.
Clover/.awn Village
A f'~achment to Rezoning Request 8/23/99
Physical Location: Route 250 West across from Blue l~idge Building Supply,
East of Cory Farms Subdivision and on the East Side of the l~asonic Lodge
Property.
~UEST'ZON$ - PAGE 2 OF THE APPL. ZCA T'ZON FOR ZON'ZNG tAAP
AtAENDI~ENT:
What is the Comprehensive Plan des/_qnation for this property7
The Comprehensive P/an designated this property for/-//gh Density
Res/dent/a/use.
What public need or benefit does this rezoninq server
~enera//y, rezon/ng this property to high density res/dent/a/use w/ii ass/m'
in the County's effort to encourage greater utilization o£ land in designated
Development Areas by achieving higher gross dens/t/es for res/dent/a/
development. This rezoning will ass/st in meeting the compact and high
density housing need w/thin a designated Development area cons/stent w/th
the Comprehensive p/an. The availability of housing For the County's
expanding population can be be~er met by rezoning property in the vicinity
of pub/lc utilities. An indirect bene~'t is realized by protect/ng the natural
and scenic resources in the rural areas when housing is provided inside the
designated Development area.
Specifically, this parcel is located in the Community o£ Crozet per IAap G
of the Comprehensive P/an and shown as designated for Ne/ghberhood
density, 3- 6 dwellling units per acre. Yt is adJacent to HC zoning and
across from HC zoning where a site plan has been approved For o Food Lion
and additional retail spaces.
Are public water, sewer, and roads available to serve this site2 Will there
by any impact to these facilities2
Public Water: Public water is currently serving the Cory Farms subdivision.
As part of the Food L/on development, the water//ne is to be ex"tended on
the North side of RY 350 along the front of the/~asonic Lodge to serve this
property. There is an ACSA part/c/pat/on to oversize the waterline ex~ens/on
Public 5ewer: Public sewer is currently serving the Cory Farms subdivision.
As part of the Food L/on development, the water//ne is to be extended
the North s/de of 1~ 7' 250 to serve this proper~y. The ca~c/~
~ension is planned ~o serve ~h/s
goads: This ~rce/ fronts on ~ ~ 350 W~r which is a prima~ road serving
?he Development oreo.
What impact Will there be on the County's na~ura/, scenic, and historic
A/though ail/and is may be considered a 'natural" resource, this proper-ky
w/thin the Oeve/opment area w/i/provide the planned alternative to
res/dent/a/un/ts in rural areas. Y/adequate housing is ava#ab/e, it wi//lessen
the pressure to take rural aareage and add it to the beve/opment area. The
/and is gently roi/in9 w/th no specific features.
There is no historic or scenic significance to this specific parcel
Describe your request in detail includinq why you are requestin_q .this
particular xon/nq
The particular zoning district requested is ~6. This w/ii a/iow compact
neighborhood housing options on the propers/. The utilities to serve this
dens/~/ are available in c/ese prox/mi~/. The services available (to come}
across the ~treet w/ii include a grocery store, and other neighborhood
service stores. Zt is not expected that 6 un/ts per acre w/ii be possible
though 1~6 w/i/provide the opt/mum f/ex/b///~/ on m/n/mum lots where
res/dent w/ii have sma//yards with//mlted exterior maintenance.
A/though no proffers have been submi~ed at this time, it is anticipated tha?
inferno/pedestrian trove/ways wi//be provided to connect to the proposed
adJacent commercial development.
MEMORANDUM
ATTACHMENT F
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Elaine Echols, Senior Planner
Steven A. Allshouse, Fiscal Impact Planner
November 16, 1999
ZMA 99-11 (Clover Lawn)
I ran two scenarios involving the property covered under this proposed zoning map amendment. The
first scenario involved the development that could take place under current zoning. Per your
instructions, I assumed that 3 single family detached residences (SFD's) would be built in the year
2000. According to the County's Cost Revenue Impact Model (CRIM) the development, of 3 SFD's
on this site would have a twenty year cumulative net fiscal impact of negative $73,000.
The second scenario involved the proposed development of 15 multifamily units on the site. I
assumed that these dwelling units would be built in the year 2000. According to CRIM, the twenty
year cumulative net fiscal impact of this development would be negative $188,000.
The County, in other words, would be $115,000 better offrejectmg the proposed development than
accepting it. Note that residential projects generally do not pay for themselves, and that Albemarle
County can and should take issues such as transportation, environmental protection, and affordable
housing into account in determining whether or not to accept this and other proposed development.
If you have any questions about this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at X3389.
SAA/saa
Attachments
David R Bowerman
Charlot~ Y. Humphds
Forrest R. Marshalk Jr.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARI F.
Office of Board of Supendsors
401 Mclntire Road
Charlottesville, V'n'cdinia 22902..4596
(804) 296-.5843 FAX (804) 296--5800
Charles S. Martin
Waltm' E Perkins
White Hall
S~ly H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
December 9, 1999
Mr. William W. Finley
Rt. 1, Box 251
Free union, VA 22940
Dear Mr. Finley:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on December 8, 1999, you were reappointed to
ser~e as the White Hall District representative on the Albemarle County Planning Commission,
with said term to begin on January 1, 2000 and to expire on December 31, 2003. I have enclosed
an updated roster for your convenience.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's
appreciation for your willingness to continue to serve the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
Charles S. Martin
Chairman
CSM/lab
Enclosure
cc: James L. Camblos, III
Larry Davis
Wayne Cilimberg
Printed on recycled paper
David E Bowerman
Rio
Charlotte Y. Humphris
&~ckJoue~
Forrest R. Mamhall, Jr.
COUNTY OF ALBEMAI~I .E
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mclntire Road
Charlofle.wille, Vhrjinia 229024596
(804) 296-584,3 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martin
Walter E Perkins
Sally H. Thomas
S~muel Miller
December 9, 1999
Mr. C. Jared Lowenstein
2431 Proffit Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22911-5~752
Dear Mr. Lowenstein:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on December 8, 1999, you were reappointed to
serve as the at-large representative on the Albemarle County Planning Commission, with said
term to begin on January 1, 2000 and to expire on December 31,2001. I have enclosed an
updated roster for your convenience.
On behalf of the Board, ] would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's
appreciation for your willingness to continue to serve the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
Charles S. Martin
Chairman
CSM/lab
Enclosure
cc: James L. Camblos, III
Larry Davis
Wayne Cilimberg
Printed on recycled paper
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Members of the Board of Supervisors
Laurie Bentley, Senior Deputy Clerk
December 3, 1999 (QjJy)~
Vacancies on Boards and Commissions
I have updated the list of vacancies on boards and commissions through
February 28, 2000,
cc: Bob Tucker Larry Davis
Ch'ville Regional Chamber of Commerce