HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201600090 Application 2016-07-25 AlbemarleCommunityDevelopmentDepartrr
401 Mclntira Road Chrlottesville,
VA 22902-4!
'"" Noir+ Voice:(434)296-5832 Fax:(434)972-4Planning Application
PARCEL/ OWNER INFORMATION
IMP 04500-00-00-06801 Owner(s): B PROPERTIES LC
Application # ARB2O1600090
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Legal Description ACREAGE PARCEL"A" BEI tt R LIVING BUILDING SUPPLY
Magisterial Dist. RioLand Use Primary Commercial
Current AFD Not in A/F District " ' Current Zoning Primary : Highway Commercial
[APPLICATION INFORMATION
Street Address 2070 SEMINOLE TRL CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22901 Entered
Judy Martin
Application Type ' Architectural Review Board' s/25/2016
Project Malloy Ford Auto Dealership- Conceptual
Received Date 07/25/16 Received Date Final Submittal Date 07/25/16 Total Fees
Closing File Date Submittal Date Final Total Paid
Revision Number
Comments
Legal Ad
SUB APPLICATION(s)
Type Sub Application Comment
Conceptual Site Development Plan 07/25/16
APPLICANT / CONTACT INFORMATION
ContactType j Name Address CityState Zip I Phone I PhoneCf
Owner/Applicant B PROPERTIES LC P 0 BOX 7627 CHARLOTTESVILL 22906
Primary Contact VALERIE LONG AND ASHLEY DAVIES/WIL 321 EAST MAIN STREET CHARLOTTESVILL 22902 4349515709
Signature of Contractor or Authorized Agent Date
*awe ,41110-
Nee Nine
Architectural Review Board Application
Part A: Applicant, Contact and Parcel Information
Project Name: Malloy Ford Auto Dealership
Tax map and parcel(s): 45-6801 Physical Street Address: 2070 Seminole Trail
Contact Person: Valerie Long and Ashley Davies
Business Name: Williams Mullen
Address 321 East Main Street City Charlottesville State VA Zip 22902
Daytime Phone( ) 951-5709 Fax#( �) E-mail vlong@williamsmullen.com
Owner of Record: B Properties LC, John Nunley
Address P.O. Box 7627 City Charlottesville State VA zip 22906
Daytime Phone( ) 962-0500 Fax#( ) E-mail )nunleym5@btrlvg.com
Part B: Review Type and Fee
Select review type
Review by the Architectural Review Board
X Conceptual Plan/Advisory Review(for a Special Use Permit or a No Fee
Rezoning)
Preliminary/Initial Review of a Site Development Plan No Fee
Final Review of a Site Development Plan $1075.00
Amendment to an approved Certificate of Appropriateness $242.00
Building Permit Review $634.00
County-wide Certificate of Appropriateness
Structures 750' or more from the EC,no taller than 5 stories No Fee
Structures located behind a structure that fronts the EC No Fee
Personal wireless service facilities No Fee
Fencing or Equipment or Lighting No Fee
Additions to ARB-approved buildings No Fee
Minor amendments to site or architectural plans No Fee
Building permits where the change is 50%or less of the altered elevation No Fee
NOTE: For SIGNS, use the combined APPLICATION AND CHEKLIST FOR SIGNS.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BP# ARB#
Fee Amount$ Date Paid By who? Receipt# Check# By
County of Albemarle Dept of Community Development,401 Mclntire Rd,Charlottesville,VA 22902 Voice:(434)296-5832 Fax:(434)972-4126
10/2015 Page I of 2
OVER
Part C: Description of Proposal
Describe your proposal.Attach a separate sheet if necessary.
Review of Conceptual Building Design for proposed auto dealership to include outdoor storage and display
of automobiles in the Entrance Corridor. See project narrative (attached)for more details.
Part D: Applicant Agreement
Applicant must read and sign
• Each application package must contain(8) folded copies of all plans and documents being submitted.
Only (1) set of building material samples is required. All submittal items, including building material
samples, become the property of Albemarle County. Applicants are encouraged to maintain duplicate
copies of all submittal items in their own files.
• Only complete application packages will be scheduled for ARB review. The application package is not
complete without the appropriate checklist, completed, signed, and included with the required submittal
materials indicated on the checklist.
I hereby certify that I own the subject property or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in filing this
application. *See submittal requirements below. I also certify that the information provided on this application
and accompanying information is accurate, true, and correct to the best of my knowledge, and that the attached
planscontainall information required by the appropriate checklist.
VA.U. t.U. l.()
Signature of owner, owner's epresentative Date
or contract purchaser
Ua (��e l,-e c u- tA2/.) Pri ri.S — v`l 5E -
Printed
l -Printed name, Title Daytime phone number of Signatory
*Ownership Information:
• If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of Iegal entity or organization including, but not
limited to, the name of a corporation, partnership or association, or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious
name, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing above has
the authority to do so.
• If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted containing
the owner's written consent to the application.
• If the applicant is the agent of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be submitted that is
evidence of the existence and scope of the agency. Attach the owner's written consent.
11/2010 Page 2 of 2
OVER-->
VW' '4ti410` i✓
44.
Architectural Review Board
Concept Plan/Advisory Review
Submittal Requirements Checklist
Part A_Applicant.Contact and.Parcel Information
Project name: 110,1 101 Foroi Auto Veale(.sn 1-„
Tax map and parcel#: 4S - 63G 1
Street address/location: -z - , ,eta,:no le Lura
Location of property (landmarks, intersections, or other): C„frt.4 &he L:vt�
PartB Advisory"Review Requirements Checklist
Important Note: Submittal packages must contain (8)collated copies of all information unless otherwise
indicated.
A. Written description of the proposal
Qj Provide a general description of all proposed work.
Explain how the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and the Entrance Corridor.
B. Sketch plan showing the following (drawn to the scale of 1"=20', clearly legible and folded):
[� Location(s) of proposed building(s) on the site.
LiSchematic layout of parking, travelways, and other improvements.
dLocation of existing and proposed tree lines. Individually identify trees of 6-inch caliper or greater.
LTJ Existing and proposed topography and conceptual grading drawn with contour intervals of 5-feet or
less, and with sufficient offsite topography to describe prominent and pertinent off-site features and
physical characteristics, but in no case less than 50-feet outside of the site.
It Sheet number, total number of sheets, date of the drawings, date and description of the latest
revision, and contact information for the firm preparing the drawings in the title block on all drawings.
C. Appearance of the proposed building(s)
a Show a representation of the appearance of the proposed building(s). This may include architectural
elevations, perspective sketches, or photos of the proposed building(s). These documents should
provide a basic understanding of:
❑ The size, form and scale of the building.
❑ The architectural style of the building.
❑ The proposed building materials and color(s).
D. Additional material
14 Provide labeled, color, 8-'/2” x 11" photographs of the site as seen from both directions on the
Entrance Corridor.
❑ The applicant is welcome to submit any additional material that will make the conceptual review more
productive. Drawings or other submittal items that clarify topography, visibility, utilities, landscaping,
or other unique or unusual conditions are welcome.
1
Revised 7/28/10
v *II 4411°
Part C: Applicant Agreement
Applicant must read and sign
• Each application package must contain (8) folded copies of all plans and documents being submitted.
Only (1) set of building material samples is required. All submittal items, including building material
samples, become the property of Albemarle County. Applicants are encouraged to maintain
duplicate copies of all submittal items in their own files.
• All information in this checklist is required, unless specifically waived by the ARB, prior to processing
an advisory or concept plan review by the ARB. Additional submittal materials may be required,
depending on the proposal.
• Only complete application packages will be scheduled for ARB review. The application package is not
complete without this checklist, completed, signed, and included with the required submittal materials
indicated on the checklist.
In representing the above referenced firm submitting this application for review, I hereby state that the
information provided on this application, and all accompanying information, is accurate, true and correct
to the best of my knowledge, and that the attached plans contain all information required by this checklist.
g 7.25 .16
Sign. ure of person completing checklist Date
�,,,�d I ;rel ecnan - l3RV✓ Arc�'/eJ 434 q'1 I - 711 0
Printed Name/Title Daytime phone number of Signatory
County of Albemarle Department of Planning and Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
(434) 296-5832 Tel, (434) 972-4126 Fax
www.albemarle.orq
RECEIVED
7 5 2'i15
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
2
Revised 7/28/10
�M
NINO
G
0
t �'`R C H I T E C I S www.brucewardell.com Project Narrative—
1 1 2 fourth street ne ARB Conceptual Review
. charlottesville
virginia 22902 Malloy Ford
[p] 434 . 971 . 7160
:f] 434971 . 7166 2070 Seminole Trail
Charlottesville VA 22901
FROM: brwarchitects
TO: Albemarle County
DATE: 07.22.16
Project Proposal
The proposed project for 2070 Seminole Trail includes the following:
Project Description:
Renovation of existing Building Supply store and warehouse into Ford Dealership.
The majority of the project re-utilizes the existing space as Showroom and Sales, Parts
and Service Office as well as Mechanical auto repair shop. All facades of the existing
building are to be renovated with a combination of Metal paneling, new paint and
storefront Windows. A new 2700 sq. ft. 'Service Drop-off' addition is proposed for the
southern side of the building's front as well as the Entry Portal—typically a main feature of
Ford's design standards.
• Design Intent
Update the building's façade with a design that is both in keeping with Ford standards as
well as one following the county's entry corridor guidelines. Ways in which Ford has
commented on how their design relates to the standard Guidelines:
o Building Forms and Features—Current scale of the existing building has been maintained
and further refined by the proposed design. The overall scale of the architectural
elements and use of finishes and textures will be traditional in manner relating to historic
buildings in the area. Similar to traditional architecture in the region, the following
elements have been underscored by the exterior renovation:
• Fascia and colonnade on either side of the entrance.
• Use of differentiating materials to emphasize scale and building functions
• Center entrance portal with vestibule to the showroom
o Human Scale
• Entry Portal scales down and defines showroom entrance
• Layering of material finishes vertically and horizontally scales the front façade in
a more traditional manner in that they establish a base, middle and cap.
• Service entrance recessed from front façade further delineates building function
and helps hide rear of existing building from Entry corridor.
o Entrance Corridor: Building scale is maintained and storefront accentuated by glass and
fascia wall; more in keeping with other buildings on route 29.
NNW
o Elimination of building blankness:
• Addition of storefront will give building a more transparent appearance.
• Existing colonnade has been maintained and improved in new design
with new materials.
o Accessory structure : will be re-clad and repainted to maintain consistency with
new showroom.
o Visibility issues from corridor : Loading, service, refuse, storage and utilities will
be located behind the showroom and service entry of the building. Screening will
be harmonious with building architecture.
This project is compatible with the surrounding area in that it does not drastically alter the footprint
of the existing condition. Also the proposed new addition will help hide the rambling rear portion of
the structure—currently building storage which will be turned into auto service bays.
We believe the development will improve the current condition of the site. The public will benefit
from a new updated building design along the 29 corridor as well as the economic value in
retaining a business already prospering in the county. Also, there is a component of sustainability
in this project in the form of adaptive re-use and the plan's utilization of the entire portion of the
existing structures.
Thank you,
BRW
Bs�i31 R H I T E C T S www.brucewardell.com Project Narrative -
1 1 2 fourth street ne ARB Conceptual Review
Charlottesville
virginia 22902 Malloy Ford
[p] 434 . 971 . 7160
f] 434 . 971 . 7166 2070 Seminole Trail
Charlottesville VA 22901
FROM: brwarchitects
TO: Albemarle County
DATE: 07.22.16
Project Proposal
The proposed project for 2070 Seminole Trail includes the following:
Project Description:
Renovation of existing Building Supply store and warehouse into Ford Dealership.
The majority of the project re-utilizes the existing space as Showroom and Sales, Parts
and Service Office as well as Mechanical auto repair shop. All facades of the existing
building are to be renovated with a combination of Metal paneling, new paint and
storefront Windows. A new 2700 sq. ft. 'Service Drop-off' addition is proposed for the
southern side of the building's front as well as the Entry Portal—typically a main feature of
Ford's design standards.
• Design Intent
Update the building's façade with a design that is both in keeping with Ford standards as
well as one following the county's entry corridor guidelines. Ways in which Ford has
commented on how their design relates to the standard Guidelines:
o Building Forms and Features—Current scale of the existing building has been maintained
and further refined by the proposed design. The overall scale of the architectural
elements and use of finishes and textures will be traditional in manner relating to historic
buildings in the area. Similar to traditional architecture in the region, the following
elements have been underscored by the exterior renovation:
• Fascia and colonnade on either side of the entrance.
• Use of differentiating materials to emphasize scale and building functions
• Center entrance portal with vestibule to the showroom
o Human Scale
• Entry Portal scales down and defines showroom entrance
• Layering of material finishes vertically and horizontally scales the front façade in
a more traditional manner in that they establish a base, middle and cap.
• Service entrance recessed from front façade further delineates building function
and helps hide rear of existing building from Entry corridor.
o Entrance Corridor: Building scale is maintained and storefront accentuated by glass and
fascia wall; more in keeping with other buildings on route 29.
o Elimination of building blankness:
• Addition of storefront will give building a more transparent appearance.
• Existing colonnade has been maintained and improved in new design
with new materials.
o Accessory structure : will be re-clad and repainted to maintain consistency with
new showroom.
o Visibility issues from corridor : Loading, service, refuse, storage and utilities will
be located behind the showroom and service entry of the building. Screening will
be harmonious with building architecture.
This project is compatible with the surrounding area in that it does not drastically alter the footprint
of the existing condition. Also the proposed new addition will help hide the rambling rear portion of
the structure—currently building storage which will be turned into auto service bays.
We believe the development will improve the current condition of the site. The public will benefit
from a new updated building design along the 29 corridor as well as the economic value in
retaining a business already prospering in the county. Also, there is a component of sustainability
in this project in the form of adaptive re-use and the plan's utilization of the entire portion of the
existing structures.
Thank you,
BRW