HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201300043 Correspondence 2014-04-01 Michelle Roberge
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 1:06 PM
To: Scott Collins
Cc: Michelle Roberge; Margaret Maliszewski; Troy Austin
Subject: Briarwood subdivision plats, site plans, site plan amendments, and ARB application
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
As requested this email shall serve as an update for Briarwood subdivision plats, site plans, site plan
amendments, and ARB application,which are under review/pending resubmittal. It appears the applicant is
actively moving forward with the plans through discussions and submitals of revised TIA and ARB
applications; however, due to the complexity of the various overlapping items many incremental approvals and
reviews must be accomplished by various departments prior to resubmittal and or approval of the mitigation
plan.
* SDP2013-35 minor site plan amendment_Landscape Mitigation Plan
1St round of comments sent on 7-3-13, staff has not received a resubmittal from the applicant. The applicant
made an ARB application ARB-2013-174, ARB approval is one of the requirements to move forward with the
proposal. Subsequently the applicant submitted ARB2014-40, which goes to the ARB on May 5th. Thus it
appears this mitigation plan(minor amendment)proposal should take into consideration the ARB findings on
May 5th and the mitigation plan may need to be revised to match (if it doesn't already match) what ARB
reviews/approves.
A second submittal of the minor amendment has not been submitted by the applicant to address the 7-3-13
comments.
This minor amendment/mitigation plan will be utilized to process the Special Exception request for the 20'
buffer disturbance per Chapter 18 Section 21.7(c)1. The Special Exception for the"20' buffer disturbance
waiver" is still applicable. This will be require to go to the BOS.
Please note that the Special Exception for the Critical Slope Waiver associated with the Gas Station Site plan is
no longer applicable, as the ordinance recently changed (on March 5, 2014) how the County handles these
slopes. The slopes onsite are now categorized as "Managed Slopes" a waiver is not required to disturb them;
however, the improvements proposed on these slopes must meet design standards provided in 30.7.5 to mitigate
the impacts caused by the disturbance of the slopes. Engineering is your primary contact for this aspect of the
initial site plan.
* ARB-2013-174: Briarwood Commercial. and then * ARB2014-40: Briarwood Commercial. This
submittal goes to ARB May 5,2014.
WP02013-18_the briarwood underground detention project.
Approved on 8-20-13.
SDP2013-34 minor site piar amendrrierf_ tr. io numbers and parking spaces
Is round of comments s r. ` _: . s.. :, e :n. n- -„
em. o_ ��, � a� .�. o_�f:�., minor am�n ._a� _�G. ao, 7�e,
tint applicant to address those _:n
*SDP2012-64 Preliminary Site pla>i' Briarwood Gas Station
• Comments were provided to the applicant on 7-19-13. Based on the complexity and overlapping nature of the
project staff is awaiting revisions prior to approval or approval with conditions.Notably staff is awaiting
revisions to the mitigation plan SDP2013-35 to be approved prior to this plan being approved.
Please note that the Special Exception for the Critical Slope Waiver associated with the Gas Station Site plan
(comment#2 on the 7-19-13 comment letter) is no longer applicable, as the ordinance recently changed (on
March 5, 2014)how the County handles these slopes. The slopes onsite are now categorized as "Managed
Slopes" a waiver is not required to disturb them; however,the improvements proposed on these slopes must
meet design standards provided in 30.7.5 to mitigate the impacts caused by the disturbance of the slopes. It may
be possible for the applicant to consult with Engineering staff prior to resubmittal to assure design standards are
being met with the proposal. Or Engineering may require the applicant to resubmit and then will review to
assure the design standards are met.
The minor amendment/mitigation plan shall be approved prior to the approval of the preliminary site plan.
*SUB2013-43 Briarwood Commercial Lot—preliminary subdivision plat for 5 commercial lots
2 rounds of review have went out on this project (4-17-13 and 7-19-13). A resubmittal has not been submitted
addressing the comments. In addition to many other comments remaining, staff is awaiting approvals of the
revised traffic analysis requested by VDOT and Engineering to determine if the road is adequate to carry traffic
volume.
*SUB2013-29 Briarwood—Final plat_Request for final plat approval to create 31 residential lots ... Lots
14-22 (phase lA-1, Lots 15-23A (phase 1A-2), lots 43 —47 (phase 5). 2 rounds of review have went out on this
project (4-3-13 and 7-19-13). Pending action by the applicant with regard to legal documents.
Christopher P.Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development'County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 Ivlclntire Road I Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext.3443
From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 8:20 AM
To:Troy Austin
Cc: Christopher Perez; Michelle Roberge
Subject: RE: 13-338 Briarwood Commercial - Revised Traffic Study
Troy-
Thanks for the email. There are actually(2) current plans under review at the county both pending approval (or
approval to move forward) based on the approval of the TIA traffic study for the intersection. The (2) projects are:
SUB2013-00043 Briarwood Commercial Lots—Preliminary Subdivision plat
SDP2012-00064 Briarwood Gas Station—Preliminary Plat
I have copied the planner, Chris Perez, on this email as well, since he will be tracking the approval of the TIA study and
ultimately the approval of the (2) preliminary plats so we can move forward with the final plans and road plans for these
projects.
Thank you.
Scott Collins
From: Austin, Nathran. (VD:7 -.
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 201z - '.
To:Scott Collins ..►
Subject: RE: 13-338 Briarwood Commercial- Revised Traffic Study
Scott,
is there a current site plan under review for this site or are you just wanting to get the TIA out of the way before
submitting?
Troy Austin, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
Land Development—South
Culpeper District
P.O. Box 1017
Troy,VA 22974
Phone: (434)589-5871
Fax: (434)589-3967
From: Scott Collins [mailto:scott collins-engineering.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 1:24 PM
To: Austin, Nathran. (VDOT)
Cc: Proctor, Charles C. (VDOT); Michelle Roberge
Subject: RE: 13-338 Briarwood Commercial - Revised Traffic Study
Troy-
Attached is the revised conclusion, changing the summary about the number of lanes to match the section, as
requested. This is the only change.
Thanks, and let me know when you think this will be approved.
Thx.
Scott
From:Austin, Nathran. (VDOT) [mailto:Nathran.AustinPvdot.virginia.govJ
Sent:Wednesday, March 19, 2014 8:33 AM
To:Scott Collins
Subject: RE: 13-338 Briarwood Commercial-Revised Traffic Study
Scott,
I notice that in section 7.0 Summary and Conclusion, paragraph three references a "5 to 6 lane section on Briarwood
Drive". This should be revised to match the 7 lane section that is currently being proposed.
Troy Austin, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
Land Development—South
Culpeper District
P.O. Box 1017
Troy, VA 22974
Phone: (434) 589-5871
Fax: (434) 589-3967
From: Scott `-oliin�
Sent: Wednes63) . Marcr. 2C_�- F
Tp: Michelle Roberge; Austin, Nathran OOT); Proctor, Charles C. (VDOT)
Cc: Christopher Perez
Subject: 13-338 Briarwood Commercial - Revised Traffic Study
Michelle,Troy, Chuck-
Thank you again for meeting with us last week to discuss the Briarwood Commercial intersection and Briarwood drive. I
am dropping off(3) hard copies of the final traffic study(with the couple of changes that Chuck spoke about in the
meeting last week), but I also wanted to email it out to everyone so that everyone would have a digital copy of it as
well. Thank you again for the help with this, and please let us know if you need anything else.
Thank you.
Scott Collins
Collins Engineering
434-293-3719