HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201600097 Correspondence 2016-07-05 •
Christopher Perez
From: Whitman "Pete"Cross <wc900@comcast.net>
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2016 5:53 PM
To: Frank Pohl; Bruce Dotson; Brad Sheffield; Christopher Perez
Subject: RE: Determination of stream status/slope requirements: SUB201600097- Dunlora Overlook-
Prelim Plat&SDP201600028 - Dunlora Overlook - Initial Site Plan
Frank,
Thanks for the quick response and including me in site walks, meetings, etc.. I am usually not
available on Wed. and Thurs. from 8:30am to 1 pm ...when I work as a trainer at ACAC in Alb.
Sq..
I am not familiar with the locations for the 'two streams' referred to below in red. Not sure what
the designation is for the stream I am concerned about at the base of the slope on the western
edge of my property.
will call you in the next few days if you are not away over the holiday.
Sincerely,
Whitman "Pete"Cross
900 Charter Oaks Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
H- 434-964-9264
Cell- 434-996-8136
wc900@comcast.net
From: Frank Pohl [mailto:fpohl@albemarle.org]
Sent: Friday,July 01, 2016 5:49 PM
To:Whitman "Pete" Cross<wc900@comcast.net>;
Cc:davenginajames@aol.com; 'Steve Panos'<panos320@gmail.com>; 'Tom Wheeler'
<wheelertmw@embarqmail.com>; Mark Graham <mgraham@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: Determination of stream status/slope requirements: SUB201600097- Dunlora Overlook- Prelim Plat&
SDP201600028- Dunlora Overlook- Initial Site Plan
Mr. Cross,
Please feel free to call me to discuss the stream issues when you have a chance (cellphone # is 434-466-7458). Also,
please refer to the attached email I sent today regarding this issue and an email from the applicant received earlier this
afternoon.
Sincerely,
Frank
Frank V. Pohl, PE
County Engineer
County of Albemarle
1
(434) 296-5832 Ext. 7914
From:Whitman "Pete"Cross [mailto:wc900@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday,July 01, 2016 4:13 PM
To: Bruce Dotson<bdotson@albemarle.org>; Brad Sheffield <bsheffield@albemarle.org>; Frank Pohl
<fpohl@albemarle.org>;Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>
Cc:davenginajames@aol.com; 'Steve Panos'<panos320@gmail.com>; 'Tom Wheeler'<wheelertmw@embargmail.com>
Subject: FW: Determination of stream status/slope requirements: SUB201600097- Dunlora Overlook- Prelim Plat&
SDP201600028- Dunlora Overlook- Initial Site Plan
[I was out of town until June 28th, so I missed the Site Review Committee's meeting held June 23rd.]
My western property line includes a portion of the stream at the base of the slope in
question, as can be seen by the location of the surveyor's stake at the northwestern
corner of this property. I have lived at 900 Charter Oaks Drive for nearly 18 years and,
as a retired geologist, I have carefully watched the flow in this stream throughout this
time period.
•
AT NO TIME, has the flow stopped, even under the driest conditions! This is, indeed, a
perennial stream, not an intermittent one, as defined by geological terminology in use at
the time that I wrote a VA Geological Survey report in 1959 on the ground water well
locations and yields in Western Alb. Co..
The status of the western slope of this stream is critical in protecting our subdivision and
the perennial flow of this stream.
I am requesting that you all pay close attention to the recent codes on critical slopes
related to new residential developments. The value of all the homes on the west side of
Charter Oaks Drive in Dunlora will be affected by the outcome of the County's rulings as
applied to the developer's rights of construction.
Please place my e-mail address on the list of persons to be notified when public
meetings occur related to the development of this site.
Whitman "Pete"Cross
900 Charter Oaks Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
H- 434-964-9264
Cell- 434-996-8136
wc900@comcast.net
As background for your information, the following is lifted from an e-mail you may
have received recently from David James, also a Dunlora resident:
Subject: Re:SUB201600097-Dunlora Overlook-Prelim Plat&SDP201600028-Dunlora Overlook-Initial Site Plan
2
"I met with Christopher Perez, Senior Planner, today at the county community development office. He had preliminary
site plans available for the new development behind charter oaks dr.......".....
At the time that Dunlora Forest was in the development stage there was much talk about "critical slopes" and I think some
of that prevented the developer from coming too far down the hill and has preserved an adequate buffer between the
developments. Now, however,the slopes are considered either"preserved" or"managed".
The current sight plan does contain some small slivers of"preserved" slope. Can these be expanded?Who makes that
call?No,these slopes cannot be expanded. How are they determined?The County adopted an overlay district(the steep
slopes overlay district) to categorize all the slopes within the development area and assigned them as either preserved
slopes or managed slopes based on their general characteristics (see below section 30.7.3 of the County Code which
speaks to these characteristics). The overlay district was adopted by the Board of Supervisors in 2014.
30.7.3 CHARACTERISTICS OF STEEP SLOPES
The characteristics of the steep slopes within the overlay district are as follows:
a. Managed slopes. The characteristics of managed slopes are the following: (i) the contiguous area of steep slopes is
limited or fragmented; (ii)the slopes are not associated with or abutting a water feature, including, but not limited to, a
river, stream, reservoir or pond; (iii) the slopes are not natural but, instead, are manufactured; (iv) the slopes were
significantly disturbed prior to June I, 2012; (v)the slopes are located within previously approved single-family
residential lots; or(vi) the slopes are shown to be disturbed, or allowed to be disturbed, by a prior county action.
b. Preserved slopes. The characteristics of preserved slopes are the following: (i)the slopes are a contiguous area of ten
thousand (10,000) square feet or more or a close grouping of slopes, any or all of which may be less than ten thousand
(10,000) square feet but whose aggregate area is ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more; (ii)the slopes are part of a
system of slopes associated with or abutting a water feature including, but not limited to, a river, stream, reservoir or
pond; (iii) the slopes are part of a hillside system; (iv) the slopes are identified as a resource designated for preservation in
the comprehensive plan; (v) the slopes are identified as a resource in the comprehensive plan; (vi)the slopes are of
significant value to the entrance corridor overlay district; or(vii)the slopes have been preserved by a prior county action,
including, but not limited to, the placement of an easement on the slopes or the acceptance of a proffer or the imposition
of a condition, restricting land disturbing activity on the slopes.
Additionally,there is a term for a protected water feature "W.P.O.". Same questions; how are these determined?Can they
be expanded?Why doesn't the entire length of the two adjacent steams require protection?The plan currently depicts both
streams. Engineering staff and I went out to the site to investigate the streams in more detail to determine if a buffer is
required to be established per chapter 17 of the County Code. I am awaiting a determination from the County Engineer as
to whether the County will establish the buffers on the two streams, as he is the person who would determine this. Notably
if the buffer is established it would be on both sides of the stream, I wonder how this will affect the existing homes within
your neighborhood and/or improvements that are built (homes,pools, decks, garages/sheds) within the would be buffer.
Ell keep you posted once I get a decision.
Applicable sections of the County Code for the WPO are Section 17.
Sec. 17-600 Extent of stream buffers; retention and establishment.
Except as provided in section 17-602, each erosion and sediment control plan and each VSMP permit shall provide for
stream buffers for the purposes of retarding runoff,preventing erosion, filtering nonpoint source pollution from runoff,
moderating stream temperature, and providing for the ecological integrity of stream corridors and networks, as provided
herein:
A. Development within a development area. If the development is located within a development area, stream buffers shall
be retained if present and established where they do not exist on any lands subject to this chapter containing perennial
streams, contiguous nontidal wetlands, or both. The stream buffer shall he no less than one hundred (100) feet wide on
each side of any perennial stream and contiguous nontidal wetlands, measured horizontally from the edge of the
contiguous nontidal wetlands, or the top of the stream bank if no wetlands exist.
3
err
I encourage the community to meet with Mr. Perez if possible at the county office building on McIntire and all those
concerned to attend the Site Review Committee meeting on June 23 at loam."
David James
850 Charter Oaks dr
434-566-5902
4
Christopher Perez
From: Scott Collins <scott@collins-engineering.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 3:40 PM
To: Frank Pohl; Christopher Perez; Graham Murray
Subject: RE: SUB-2016-00097 Dunlora Overlook-Preliminary Plat&SDP-2016-0028 Dunlora
Overlook-Initial site plan
Attachments: 602 Dunlora Overlook PFD Summary.pdf
Frank-
Attached is the wetland report on the two streams at the Dunlora property. As confirmed, both are intermittent
streams up to the point that they converge, in which the stream becomes a perineal stream.
Thx.
Scott
From: Frank Pohl [mailto:fpohl@albemarle.org]
Sent: Monday,June 27, 2016 9:13 AM
To:Scott Collins; Christopher Perez; Graham Murray
Subject: RE: SUB-2016-00097 Dunlora Overlook-Preliminary Plat&SDP-2016-0028 Dunlora Overlook-Initial site plan
Thanks for the comments Scott.
I plan to visit the site tomorrow and will issue a letter of determination by the end of the week. Chris will need to
address you question regarding approval with conditions.
Thanks,
Frank
Frank V. Pohl, PE
County Engineer
County of Albemarle
(434) 296-5832 Ext. 7914
From:Scott Collins [mailto:scott@collins-engineering.com]
Sent: Monday,June 27, 2016 8:30 AM
To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; Graham Murray<graham@collins-engineering.com>; Frank Pohl
<fpohl@albemarle.org>
Subject: RE: SUB-2016-00097 Dunlora Overlook-Preliminary Plat&SDP-2016-0028 Dunlora Overlook-Initial site plan
Chris, Frank-
I am back in town and I want to follow-up for a moment on the stream buffer issue on this project. This project is not
located within a water supply protection area; therefore, stream buffers only apply to perennial streams, and not
intermittent streams. The (2) streams on either side of this property are intermittent streams, and it is not until they
converge (at the very tip of the property) does the stream become a perennial stream. The county gis maps this
correctly, and these streams have been identified correctly on the GIS mapping for this area. In addition, our
development plan shows this approved buffer on the plans.
1
w
However, I can appreciate the fact that there is a lot of interest on the development of this parcel. Therefore, if you
need additional certification on these streams, we can have a wetland scientist complete an official determination of the
stream to verify that it is an intermittent stream, as currently identified on by the County.
I would, however, ask that you move forward with the approval of the preliminary plat, with a condition that any lot
development will need to meet the County ordinances. Therefore, if for some strange reason that it is a perennial
stream (Which is it not ), we can easily tweak the design with the final road plans.
Thx.
Scott
From: Christopher Perez [mailto:cperez@albemarle.org]
Sent: Monday,June 27, 2016 7:15 AM
To:Graham Murray
Cc:Scott Collins
Subject: RE:SUB-2016-00097 Dunlora Overlook-Preliminary Plat&SDP-2016-0028 Dunlora Overlook-Initial site plan
Graham,
SUB-2016-00097 Dunlora Overlook-Preliminary Plat
SDP-2016-0028 Dunlora Overlook-Initial site plan
As discussed at SRC, the above project is pending a stream determination from the County Engineer, which he
hopes to have complete by the end of the week. Also, the road type may be switching from private to public, of
which VDOT said they'd need to review the proposal again to provide revised comments be previously they
only focused on the entrance vs the entire road as currently is proposed as private. All of the above may have
the effect of three or four lots being lost, Marin Court being omitted and Varick Street being relocated, as well
as redesign of all the proposed lots, which may cause additional or modified comments to be generated. As
such, I request you defer the proposal to allow for the above determination and required revisions to be made
based on SRC comments. Once you have revised the proposal I'll redistribute it to the applicable SRC
reviewers, 14 days later I'll take an action on the proposal based on the new comments.
Christopher P. Pere/ Senior Planner
Department of Community Development(County of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road l Charlottesville, VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
From: Christopher Perez
Sent:Wednesday,June 22, 2016 10:54 AM
To: 'Scott Collins'<scott@collins-engineering.com>
Subject:SUB-2016-00097 Dunlora Overlook-Preliminary Plat&SDP-2016-0028 Dunlora Overlook-Initial site plan
Scott,
SUB-2016-00097 Dunlora Overlook-Preliminary Plat
SDP-2016-0028 Dunlora Overlook-Initial site plan
Attached is VDOT's comment letter for the above referenced plat and site plan. You now have all reviewer comments*.
*The plan currently depicts two streams (one to the north and one to the south). Engineering staff and I went out to the
site to investigate the streams in more detail to determine if a buffer is required to be established per chapter 17 of the
•
County Code. I am awaiting a determination from the County Engineer as to whether the County will establish the buffers
2
Noe
on the two streams, as he is the person who would determine this. I'll keep you posted once I get a decision. It may not be
prior to the SRC meeting but it will be before action is taken on the initial site plan and prelim sub plat.
thanks
Christopher P. Perez 1 Senior Planner
Department of Community Development County of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road l Charlottesville, VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
From: Bedsaul,Willis C. (VDOT) [mailto:Willis.Bedsaul@VDOT.Virginia.gov]
Sent:Wednesday,June 22, 2016 10:36 AM
To: Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>
Cc: Moore, Adam PE (VDOT)<Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject:SUB-2016-00097 Dunlora Overlook-Preliminary Plat&SDP-2016-0028 Dunlora Overlook-Initial site plan
Hello Chris,
Attached you'll find the signed comment letter on Dunlora Overlook preliminary plat and the initial site plan review. If
you have any questions please call me.
Thanks,
Willis C. Bedsaul
Engineer Land Use
Virginia Department of Transportation
Land Use-Charlottesville/Green
701 VDOT Way
Charlottesville Residency
Ph# 434-422-9866
Cell# 540-717-0005
3
woo-
Christopher Perez
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 6:51 AM
To: Frank Pohl
Cc: 'davenginajames@aol.com'
Subject: FW: Determination of stream status west of Charter Oaks Drive
Frank,
Dunlora Overlook
Below is some correspondence from a couple neighbors on the stream situation at Dunlora Overlook and their
observations of it over the years they have lived there. They asked I forward this information on to you for
consideration while making your determination of the stream type.
Christopher P. Perez 1 Senior Planner
Department of Community Development County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 McIntire Road Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
From: davenginajames@aol.com [mailto:davenginajames@aol.com]
Sent: Friday,June 24, 2016 7:34 PM
To:Christopher Perez<cperez@albemarle.org>; patpunch3@gmail.com; Steve Panos<panos320@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: Determination of stream status west of Charter Oaks Drive
Chris,
Thanks for allowing community comments and attendance at the review meeting in Thursday. I know you have
to field concerns from many different parties about many different issues. We heard several about traffic and
such. My concerns are environmental, dealing solely with the stream and forest in my back yard. I appreciate
that you have forwarded those concerns to engineering. Below is an email from a neighbor also affected by the
development. His perspective is unique and I ask that you will forward this on to Frank Pohl to aid in his
assessment.
David James
850 Charter Oaks Dr
#434-566-5902
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Whitman Cross" <wc900@comcast.net>
Date: June 24, 2016 at 6:49:42 PM EDT
To: <davenginajames@aol.com>
Subject: RE: Determination of stream status west of Charter Oaks Drive
David,
Please pass this along as needed:
I have lived at 900 Charter Oaks Drive for nearly 18 years. As a geologist,
I have watched the flow in this stream throughout that time.
1
'441,0 Nee
AT NO TIME,has the flow stopped, even under the driest conditions! This is,
indeed, a perennial stream, not an intermittent one as defined by geological
terminology that I have used ever since writing a paper in 1959 on the
ground water well locations and yields in Western Alb. Co. for the VA
Geological Survey.
The status of the western slope of this stream is critical in protecting our
subdivision and the perennial flow of this stream.
Pete
Whitman'Pete'Cross, retired geologist
900 Charter Oaks Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
H: 434-964-9264
Cell: 434-996-8136
wc900@comcast.net
2
; r..r
Christopher Perez
From: Judy Schlussel<jschlussel@earthlink.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 7:10 PM
To: Christopher Perez
Subject: Meeting June 23, 2016 Re: SUB201600097- Dunlora Overlook- Prelim Plat&
SDP201600028- Dunlora Overlook- Initial Site Plan
Hello—
It certainly was nice being able to meet you this morning at the meeting regarding the proposed Dunlora Overlook
subdivision. Every one who was in attendance appreciated that you gave us an opportunity to ask questions and bring up
some of our concerns. For me this meeting was both educational as well as informational and have shared my notes with
my fellow Dunlora board members.
Looking forward to communication as the process proceeds.
Thanks
Regards,
Judy Schlussel
Original Message
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: Jun 21, 2016 4:00 PM
To: 'Scott Collins'
Cc: "davenginajames@aol.com" , "patpunch3@gmail.com" , Whitman Pete Cross , Gina ,
"jschlussel@earthlink.net" , "brad@bradsheffield.com"
Subject: SUB201600097- Dunlora Overlook-Prelim Plat&SDP201600028- Dunlora Overlook- Initial Site Plan
Scott,
SUB201600097- Dunlora Overlook- Prelim Plat
SDP201600028- Dunlora Overlook- Initial Site Plan
Attached are the comments for the above referenced SRC items. VDOT comments have not been
received yet, but once they are I'll forward them to you.
Thanks
Christopher P. Perez I Senior Planner
Department of Community Development JCounty of Albemarle, Virginia
401 McIntire Road j Charlottesville, VA 22902
434296.5832 ext.3443
1
Christopher Perez
From: Judy Schlussel <jschlussel@earthlink.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 4:35 PM
To: Christopher Perez
Cc: Mark Graham
Subject: Re: Site Review for Dunlora Overlook
Good Afternoon-
I most definitely appreciate all of this information which I will forward to the Dunlora HOA President, Ross Sargent, as well
as our Supervisor, Brad Sheffield. Brad is the person who advised the Dunlora community of this proposed development.
Thanks
Judy
Original Message
From: Christopher Perez
Sent: May 25, 2016 8:31 AM
To: "jschlussel@earthlink.net"
Cc: Mark Graham
Subject: Site Review for Dunlora Overlook
Judy,
SUB2016-97 Dunlora Overlook- Preliminary Subdivision Plat
SDP2016-28 Dunlora Overlook- Initial Site Plan
My name is Christopher Perez, I'll be the County Planner reviewing the Dunlora Overlook projects
mentioned above from this point forward, as the person listed in the SRC notification letter you received
will no longer be with the County after June 2nd. Mark forwarded me your email, see my response
below:
The site review committee meeting(SRC)meeting does not occur every Thursday. It only occurs on
designated Thursdays as listed in the attached schedule. Because this project was submitted/received on
May 9th the SRC meeting for this project is scheduled for June 23, 2016 at loam in room 235. This
meeting is open to the public but is not a public hearing, nor will there be any minutes taken at this
meeting. The SRC meeting is a chance for the applicant and staff to meet face to face & go over the
review comments on the project and discuss what needs to be done to get the project in compliance w/
the requirements of the County's ordinance. Citizens are invited to the meeting to learn about the project
which is being proposed in their neighborhood and to ask questions about the project of the applicant
and staff. An action will not be taken at the SRC meeting; rather, staff has 14 days from the SRC
meeting to take action (approval, approval w/ condition, or denial) on the proposal. If the plan meets the
requirements of the ordinance, legally, it has to be approved or approved w/ conditions. Reviewer
comments should be available for this project on June 21'.
This LINK will take you to the actual plan being reviewed. To view login as public with password
public. If you are having trouble viewing the plan let me know.
1
fir►'
As the proposal moves forward and I begin my review I'll be glad to answer any of your questions. •
Also, if you have any questions for the applicant, Scott Collins, his phone number is: 434-293-3719.
Thank you for your interest in the project.
Christopher P. Perez!Senior Planner
Department of Community Development County of Albemarle,Virginia
401 McIntire Road 1 Charlottesville,VA 22902
434.296.5832 ext. 3443
From:Judy Schlussel [mailto:ischlussel@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 5:03 PM
To: Mark Graham <mgraham@albemarle.org>
Subject:Site Review for Dunlora Overlook
Hi Mark—
The Dunlora community has received some information from Brad Sheffield about the proposed Dunlora Overlook
development., The BOD was given a map of the proposed development as well as a copy of the Memo dated
May 13, 2016.
The Dunlora BOD have a few questions that need some clarification:
#1....The Site Review Committee Meeting, Thursday 10 am, rm. 235, COB ...is that every Thursday and is it open
to the public?
#2....ls the Site Review scheduled for June 23, 2016 open to the public and will this only focus on Dunlora
Overlook?
Thanks for the clarification.
Judy Schlussel
434-973-8189
Dunlora HOA VP/Sec
2
Christopher Perez
From: Mark Graham
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 11:23 AM
To: Christopher Perez
Subject: FW: Ridge at Dunlora-concern about access roads
FYI
From: Leslie Middleton [mailto:middletonleslie@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday,June 06, 2016 10:25 AM
To: Brad Sheffield<bsheffield@albemarle.org>;RSargent<rsargent77@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Graham<mgraham@albemarle.org>
Subject: Ridge at Dunlora-concern about access roads
Good morning, Brad,
I recently learned that the parcel of land to the right of Dunlora Drive entrance (before the tennis courts) is a
planned subdivision presently being called the Ridge at Dunlora(I think). This subdivision is by-right, and a
review meeting with county staff and VDOT is scheduled June 22 or 23.
The preliminary site plan shows two driveway(for two single family dwellings) exiting directly onto Rio Road
(between Dunlora Forest and the entrance to Dunlora off Rio) and another entrance onto Dunlora Drive before
the entrance to Dunlora.
At the recent transportation/traffic meeting you, Mark Graham, and VDOT hosted with Dunlora residents at
CATEC, a lot of concern was expressed about the already awkward and dangerous entrance road from Rio
Road, especially because of the lack of visibility over the hill and the very short turning lanes for cars. This new
subdivision will compound these issues greatly. I would like to express my concern shared with others at
Dunlora—that the plans for this new subdivision need to take into account the already growing problem of
access, traffic, and safety for all drivers who use Dunlora Drive and this section of Rio Road. The residents of
the proposed subdivision will be equally unhappy with their driveway/road access if it is implemented this way.
I urge you to coordinate with VDOT and Albemarle County staff to look very carefully at the proposed plans
before the planned meeting—and request the developer revise their road/driveway access plans. I would also
ask that you encourage the developer to be in touch with Dunlora Homeowner's Association(Ross Sergeant,
president)to discuss how a redesign could benefit all neighbors in this increasingly congested intersection of
roadways.
Thank you for your attention to this matter,
Leslie Middleton
Leslie Middleton
374 Shepherd's Ridge Circle
Charlottesville, VA 22901
434.293.5770 (cell)
434.293.3079 (home)
400
PROJECT: SUB201600097 Dunlora Overlook—Preliminary Plat
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Rio
TAX MAP/PARCEL: 06100-00-00-16500
LOCATION: 915 Dunlora Drive, at intersection of Rio Rd.and Dunlora Dr.
PROPOSAL: Request for preliminary plat approval for 31 dwelling units (15 single family attached and 16
single family detached)on 8.55 acres for a resulting density of 3.63 du/ac.
ZONING: R-4 Residential -4 units/acre.
ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: No
PROFFERS: No
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Neighborhood 2—Places 29: Neighborhood Density Residential—residential (3—6
units/acre) supporting uses such as religious institutions, schools and other small-scale non-residential uses.
Privately Owned Open Space; Environmental Features—privately owned recreational amenities and open
space; floodplains, steep slopes,wetlands,and other environmental features.
off ALL
44,
8 t110
rafs
`IRGINIP
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,North Wing
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126
June 2, 2016
RE: SUB201600097 Dunlora Overlook—Preliminary Plat
Tax Map Parcel 06100-00-00-16500
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter is to notify you that the following development proposal has been submitted to the County for
review:
SUB201600097 Dunlora Overlook—Preliminary Plat
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Rio
TAX MAP/PARCEL: 06100-00-00-16500
LOCATION: 915 Dunlora Drive, at intersection of Rio Rd. and Dunlora Dr.
PROPOSAL: Request for preliminary plat approval for 31 dwelling units (15 single family attached
and 16 single family detached) on 8.55 acres for a resulting density of 3.63 du/ac.
ZONING: R-4 Residential -4 units/acre.
ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: No
PROFFERS: No
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Neighborhood 2 — Places 29: Neighborhood Density Residential —
residential (3—6 units/acre)supporting uses such as religious institutions, schools and other small-
scale non-residential uses. Privately Owned Open Space; Environmental Features—privately owned
recreational amenities and open space; floodplains, steep slopes,wetlands,and other environmental
features.
This development proposal is scheduled for the Site Review Committee meeting on the date listed below.
The applicant's attendance is not mandatory, although it may be requested by the County. Regardless of
whether the applicant will be attending, the County staff will be available for consultation on the Site
Review Committee meeting date at 10:00 a.m., in Room 235 of the County Office Building on McIntire
Road in Charlottesville. This meeting will be an informal session with the Site Review Committee to
discuss issues and share information.
The development proposal will be reviewed and approved, subject to compliance with applicable
ordinances, by the Site Review Committee.
Site Review comments available (June 21, 2016)
Site Review Committee meeting date (June 23, 2016, 10 a.m.)
Plans for the proposed development are available for your review in the Department of Community
Development. To assure the file information is ready for your viewing and to allow staff to be available to help
with any questions, we encourage you to schedule a viewing time. Please call 296-5832 X3004 during
business hours(8 a.m.-5 p.m., Mon-Fri)to schedule an appointment. While an appointment is not required,
we do give priority to those with appointments. Those without appointments may find the materials are in use
by others and/or staff is not available to help. Should you wish to attend the Site Review Committee meeting,
please notify the Department of Community Development so that any concerns may be adequately addressed.
Sincerely, r..�
410
0,0-0— /d(A
Christopher/
hristopher erez
Senior Planner
Planning Services
/CH
ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS (see file for list)
cc: Dunlora Investment Investments LLC
455 Second Street SE ST., Suite 400
Charlottesville VA, 22902
Scott Collins—Collins Engineering
200 Garrett ST., Suite K
Charlottesville, VA 22902
File SUB201600097
-.wow
AFFIDAVIT
June 2, 2016
I, Carla B Harris, hereby certify that the attached notification letter was sent on the above date to those
persons listed on said notification. A total of 19 letters were sent(this includes those listed receiving a
copy).
Given under my hand in the County of Albemarle, State of Virginia this Second day of June 2016.
Notary P bli•
My commission expires October 31, 2016
File: SUB201600097
$. r J
P.
2 �»
F- La a
a- ' 0 r4 k .::��
t, t,�
4 st
r._ C Cdl
U) c II
0) c'r rU ;1.y
i!S ci E 1
`_J - r-J Ca n .
A��� I A
f r nr: 04:
Is Cia
- - in'
;11. ii i F.,e 0 4".
@Lk
3AI33 <_ s 5 F.. ,,_
s....-
ri z all c•..o
in
ko
s k'tk
Crl
>t. cv ilA 71_
i;I IU > H
V ,,7° t :it J -J 4-s U
Q J (Li
>
CM V.
00 W
z UD F—
al
D
to F—
0 XO cc
OJ E
m m
O =
U a- U
iltj
J
l(1J
_ .;,
cy
E c
O N
Q) a) O
5-4 cu N
N
Ct °
E ,, .5
C
[ en
�_ < ; >
c� C: : O
U
L-5
v
a
'.ni
C
F4=. a
O
~ (-) n 0 v G
C ft
1._. _T S
cra O�•
"6 p c �� 'I•. 7.
vca.'-< S"
!u 0 Qj
N CD
o rD a
N O
.A "B
LA g
ry
C.7'
IQ
V
Pr
(74
rrg, n N
r s4, O
7, m
1 1
m cp D >
EP �-• m
_.r°.S '? m ",,,1 . PM,
_,r,i „1 m r- ,py.. ,
`. ft (n
z ` ti.. -
C7 —
Z.:N i„ Z i° `:�
c: i... x n CI`: ="7
r r'n r J
S 743
—r--'�' rrl:ti Z
!r.. -1 Fit
} 1'.
r •
"^.a . a - .s •1[.
in
77 ,. (1
c. i�t
:,0,0 ,C.a n,til E)
en is ,- , Ci?
4 a .a> r y�
1 A
= ,7 I `i
'fs
.27 OA
.-, i ., -�,
1! .. 0 [ L
'gid 4J To;
'.E.).- /may ,,.. s.:
0,A
1- Idly
se s:
vlfcirnP
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
Phone(434)296-5832 Fax(434)972-4126
MEMORANDUM
TO: MEMBERS, SITE REVIEW COMMITTEE:
VDOT (Charlottesville) Chuck Proctor-VDOT (Culpeper)
Health Dept. -(Charlottesville) Alex Morrison -ACSA
Tim Keller-At-Large PC Member Jay Schlothauer- Inspections
Andrew Slack- GIS Dan Mahon - Parks & Rec.
Robbie Gilmer - Fire & Rescue John Anderson - Engineering
Margaret Maliszewski -ARB
Brian Walton -Thomas Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District
FROM: Albemarle County Department of Community Development-Division of Planning
DATE: May 13, 2016
RE: Site Review Committee Meeting-Thursday 10 a.m.,
Meeting Room #235, Second Floor, County Office Building
Attached is the list of site plans and subdivisions to be reviewed based on the schedule below. This list may
include electronic submittals which may be accessed by clicking on the link provided. Please review these
plans and send your written comments to the applicable planner by the Monday preceding the Thursday
meeting.
The Review Schedule is:
SITE REVIEW: June 23, 2016
If you are unable to attend the meeting, please submit your comments so they will be available at the meeting.
Cc: Architectural Review Board Mary Hughes
Krystal Brinkley Melissa Spangler
Jennifer Whitaker United States Postal Service
Melvin Kosler Sandy VonThelen
Sprint-Manager of Engineering Scott B. Peyton
Ronnie Rutherford
E-mail copy:
Board of Supervisors Planning Commission
Joe Letteri Dan Mahon
David Benish Donna Shaunesey
Ella Jordan Jack McClelland
Jeff Werner Steve Watson
Steve Blaine Melissa Wiley
Mike Heckman Ron Higgins
Sabrina Stanwood Steve Allshouse
William D. Fritz Tom Foley
*4110* N1100
Item Number: SUB201600097
Project Lead Reviewer: Ellie Ray
Project Name: Dunlora Overlook— Preliminary Plat
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Rio
TAX MAP/PARCEL: 06100-00-00-16500
LOCATION: 915 Dunlora Drive, at intersection of Rio Rd. and Dunlora Dr.
PROPOSAL: Request for preliminary plat approval for 31 dwelling units (15 single family
attached and 16 single family detached)on 8.55 acres for a resulting density of 3.63 du/ac.
ZONING: R-4 Residential -4 units/acre.
ENTRANCE CORRIDOR: No
PROFFERS: No
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Neighborhood 2— Places 29: Neighborhood Density Residential —
residential (3—6 units/acre) supporting uses such as religious institutions, schools and other
small-scale non-residential uses. Privately Owned Open Space; Environmental Features—
privately owned recreational amenities and open space; floodplains, steep slopes, wetlands,
and other environmental features.