Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201600097 Checklist 2016-02-01 • County of Albemarle PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES for By-Right Applications Tax Map and Parcel(s): 06100000016500 Date: 02-01-2016 This checklist is intended to facilitate and document the meeting discussion. Visitors: Scott Collins,Alan Taylor, Ron Hall (? -works with Alan, missed his name) Staff: Current Development: x Planning: Ellie Ray and Paty Saternye x Zoning: Ron Higgins x Engineering/County Engineer: Glenn Brooks x VDOT: Troy Austin x Service Authority: Michael Vieira Building Official: Housing Office: Description of Location: Off Rio Road near entrance to Dunlora Existing Zoning: R-4 Zoning/Planning History: None that I could find Comp. Plan location and land use designation Neighborhood 2 - Places 29; Neighborhood Density&Open AGENDA [Typically, the Planning Division planner will lead the meeting.] I. Introductions and Disclaimer: "This pre-application conference is advisory and based on information provided prior to the meeting. Since details are rarely provided at a pre-application conference, staff's comments will be general in nature. If staff doesn't have answers to an applicant's questions, we will get back to you over the next week. Similarly, if staff needs additional information to assist you in making a future application, we will get back to you over the course of the week to obtain that information." 2. Applicant explains proposal and asks questions. Summary of proposal/Questions: The applicant brought two concepts to the pre-app meeting, only one of which had been provided ahead of the meeting. A single family detached subdivision layout had been provided ahead of the meeting, and a single family attached concept was presented at the meeting(no copy provided). Both concepts are by-right. The applicant simply had questions about potential issues. N4,100- 3. Staff answers questions and identifies issues. (A list of some potential issues is provided below.) Question/answer: The applicant wanted to know where the closest sewer connection is and if there are easements already present for getting sewer to the subject parcel. Michael answered his question and provided several options for sewer service. Question/answer: Both concepts use the cluster option,with no minimum lot size. Applicant was reminded to make sure the open space used to get to the minimum 25% meets the open space definition for cluster developments. Question/answer: The single family attached concept had 30+ units. The applicant was reminded that 30 units or more must meet the recreation requirement. Question/answer The single family attached concept had a road with a cul-de-sac abutting the Dunlora recreation area;the applicant asked if a smaller cul-de-sac could be used. Engineering and VDOT both seemed OK with the design, but the applicant was advised to consult with Fire rescue on the cul-de-sac size prior to submittal. Issue: The applicant asked if VDOT will require a second connection. Troy said this parcel, due to topography and surrounding development, should qualify for a standard exception. Troy reminded the applicant that they must maintain 225'(?) between the proposed road and the existing intersection. Troy said he thought sight-distance should be fine, but they will need to show/verify on the plans. Issue: Applicant was advised to consult with Fire rescue on their potential second point of access requirement prior to submittal. Issue: Ron spoke with the applicant about the new setbacks and how that would impact their layout. Issue: Topics Discussed (Check those that apply; add notes as necessary) Comp. Plan recommendations including Master Plans and RA Plan recommendations Following Special Use Permit: meeting conditions, application plan conformance Following ZMA: application plan conformance, proffer conformance NMD Conformance with Code of Development Variation(s) required Waivers/exceptions/variations from Site Plan or Sub ordinance x Setbacks x Transportation Need for transportation study x Interconnections to adjacent property/development (street/ped/bike) -- DA x Public road access internal circulation (in conjunction with Engineer or Current Planner) Private Street request x Natural Features / Open Space Plan / Greenway System Urban Design / Public Spaces/Parks or RA- rural character issues Other community facility issues Entrance Corridor/ARB Historic Preservation Rural clustering RPD option and conservation easement options Easements Deeds required New and Existing x Utility (ACSA, RWSA, Private)/Building Code Issues Fire/Rescue Groundwater assessment, including LUST sites WPO Jurisdictional area issues 44111110' *.iiir.' 4. PROCESS DISCUSSION: Staff summarizes the review process. (Depending on application type, respectiv epartment repre :..tat - -xplains applic. ..n process, including: timing, submittal requirements, appl. tion details, scheduli : earin:.) scussion/Issues If SFD- preliminary plat,final plat, road plan,WPO If SFA- initial site plan,final site plan,WPO, road plan,final plat/ / 5. N T STEPS Additional information to be-p- .vided by staff: Additional information to be provided applicant: A 1 , e...\___ ) , \ c\-\ 'i).if\' ' _\\Q_____ Summary/Other Issues: ` ` lit_ii.LH; : \ 1 (/ ‘ \ \ \ \ \\----\-: \ \------- - 1 \/\ / f ,/..-- • 1 lktllik/7 \\:\ ((\,_fc--- \\ \ .47 \\ ‘ / ..!,./________Ty 7 ,,, • \ / -i ///'I . '' / \ \ - \ ...---- _____., ---I- - zi , I \ \‘‘ \ 0 v \ \ 1\,,,ja ,, -\-_-_,_ // ‘, ,, ,\„. \ \ ____\ • ---_____- __:_____. ,,,,,,,, ,„, , ,,, , ,./ , __ \--- - \ \ \ _....-- 3 _ _ _____,____ : / ......, y7"/.///2„. i ' \ ,/ ' . A' , / - \ „----\---- .. ...- _,, ,,_,,, ,,.:,,,/// // .-- ...\___ _ .„---- / / ///-- , 4 7N' ,, , 1 ' r':',.:;;;,..'' / --- 1 > , i / ," iNi\ \ 1 \ . / 1 1?1 -.-4 ,7.-.7 , \ -- / \ ( * .) . 7 -- / ) \ 1 \ ' 7 . • \/ • , . / /\___\_ • • i . . / . i . // / i• ' / .• .• 7 \ . "-- ' .� _--' . ` \ \ • ..,, ,,.„. „..\\,.,- � --� ~' ' _� f // \ \ � \ ~/' \ _ .", '''' 7;r/' //( `` \ \ \ ~ `// ((lc ( / \ \ \ \\ \ | / - \ �`` � ( \ \ - . \ A ` `- ` `` . ` \ \ \ . /\ , __ - ` ` .