HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201500026 Review Comments Minor Amendment 2015-12-29Short Review Comments Report for:
SDP201500026
SubApplication Type:
Avinity I Phase IV - Minor
Minor Amendment
Date Completed:07/01/2015
Reviewer:Johnathan Newberry Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:06/12/2015
Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:06/09/2015
Reviewer:John Anderson Engineering
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:05/29/2015
Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer Inspections
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated May 26, 2015.
No comments or conditions.
Division:
Date Completed:06/06/2015
Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated 5/8/15
1. Radii on North East corner of Avinity Loop shall be minimum of 25'. Currently showing 13' radii at
this intersection.
Division:
Date Completed:06/15/2015
Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:The applicant let me know that they are working directly with the ACSA on this application.
Division:
Date Completed:08/01/2015
Reviewer:John Anderson Engineering
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:08/05/2015
Reviewer:Margaret Maliszewski ARB
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:08/01/2015
Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue
Review Status:Requested Changes
Division:
Page:1 of 3 County of Albemarle Printed On:November 17, 2016
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated 7/8/15.
1. Radii on North East corner of Avinity Loop shall be minimum of 25', currently showing 13' radii at
this intersection. The radii in question is located at lot 101.
Date Completed:12/09/2015
Reviewer:Johnathan Newberry Planning
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:I notified applicant on 12/17 that the County could now approve the minor amendment.
Division:
Date Completed:08/31/2015
Reviewer:John Anderson Engineering
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:If Applicant has responded to comment, response was overlooked:
“Approved preliminary plat for Avinity II shows identical portions of Avinity Loop addressed under this
(Avinity I) MIA. There is uncertainty whether features considered under this MIA that appear on
Avinity II plat will continue to be carried under Avinity I bond. Please notify County of preference:
whether to amend Avinity I subdivision bond, or to simply double-bond roadway/drainage features
that appear on both Avinity I site plan and Avinity II plat. Revising existing Avinity I subdivision bond
would require calculating the difference between initial Avinity I site plan design for just that portion
affected by the MIA, and change proposed for this portion (Avinity Loop).” (31-Jul 2015; review
comment #1)
Recent evaluation of bonds at a separate subdivision shows that with respect to bonds, amended site
plans pose complexity and confusion. This comment should be addressed –it is possible response
indicating preference has been overlooked. J. Anderson: 434.296-5832 –x3069.
(All other engineering review comments addressed with this, or prior, revision –thank you)
janderson2 8/31/2015 8:37 AM
Division:
Date Completed:08/25/2015
Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:Based onplans dated 8/11/15.
1. Radii on North East corner of Avinity Loop shall be minimum of 25', currently showing 13' radii at
this intersection. The radii in question is located at lot 101.
Division:
Date Completed:08/31/2015
Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:12/12/2015
Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:12/16/2015
Reviewer:John Anderson Engineering
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:Text of Kaitlyn Kostelec Walthall email, 12/9/2015 3:11 PM
"John – re: bonding
The Avinity Minor Site plan amendment bond estimate I sent previously (attached) covered all the
work associated with this amendment.
The new Avinity II plans remove all of the Minor Site Plan information from the proposed plans and
show it as existing (these were submitted yesterday).
Is it possible to bond the amount of the Avinity Minor Site plan work ($257,494.16). This wouldn’t
involve double bonding any features in Avinity II.
Please advise.
"
Note -$257,494.16 was a Collins Engineering estimate of Minor Site Plan Amendment #2 road/utility
design items [ref EMAIL Attachment, KKW/CE to JEA/CD -Fri 7/17/2015 3:35 PM].
Expense of road/utility items associated with Avinity Final Site Plan Phase IV that are replaced with
Phase IV, Minor Site Plan Amendment #2 design features will not exist, will not be bonded, and will
have no effect on Engineering recommendation of No objection to SDP20150026. Phase IV is not
yet bonded. When it is, Amendment and not initial FSP design features will be bonded. In other
words, discussion concerning effect of bonds was misplaced since at present no Phase IV bonds
have been posted. Avinity I Minor Amendment #2 and Avinity II will be bonded in phases, separately
and consistent with approved or amended design. I sincerely regret the unnecessary delay and effort
(Ref. CV/RMS Document).
janderson2 12/16/2015 5:46 PM
Division:
Page:2 of 3 County of Albemarle Printed On:November 17, 2016
The Avinity Minor Site plan amendment bond estimate I sent previously (attached) covered all the
work associated with this amendment.
The new Avinity II plans remove all of the Minor Site Plan information from the proposed plans and
show it as existing (these were submitted yesterday).
Is it possible to bond the amount of the Avinity Minor Site plan work ($257,494.16). This wouldn’t
involve double bonding any features in Avinity II.
Please advise.
"
Note -$257,494.16 was a Collins Engineering estimate of Minor Site Plan Amendment #2 road/utility
design items [ref EMAIL Attachment, KKW/CE to JEA/CD -Fri 7/17/2015 3:35 PM].
Expense of road/utility items associated with Avinity Final Site Plan Phase IV that are replaced with
Phase IV, Minor Site Plan Amendment #2 design features will not exist, will not be bonded, and will
have no effect on Engineering recommendation of No objection to SDP20150026. Phase IV is not
yet bonded. When it is, Amendment and not initial FSP design features will be bonded. In other
words, discussion concerning effect of bonds was misplaced since at present no Phase IV bonds
have been posted. Avinity I Minor Amendment #2 and Avinity II will be bonded in phases, separately
and consistent with approved or amended design. I sincerely regret the unnecessary delay and effort
(Ref. CV/RMS Document).
janderson2 12/16/2015 5:46 PM
Date Completed:12/29/2015
Reviewer:Johnathan Newberry Planning
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Page:3 of 3 County of Albemarle Printed On:November 17, 2016