The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZMA201500007 Presentation To BOS Zoning Map Amendment 2016-11-09BROOKHILL ZMA2015=007 AND SP2015=025 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 11/9/2016 :4543 CREEK tR/2 s— thabed 9� z±¥ _ � ., , _ + _ �/ ■ � ` Ilk UKF4 Ir 29 4t IF IN LOCATION 'r Monlicell❑ United Soccer Club R C M a€e i s C ti v' t 9� N a 0 • o ?I: . nt3ry Shoo l F a wir r r — i a YrO�r]aeUBlvd 0+i. 4 + i dL Albemarle -' Residential Services r� � f ��.lha�nridg�;Na3 `• n IL IkIkOo�, . ® AFggginearing ' t KOD€AKD. Rose Anne's.® 4 J perp GrOunds•Rd— `•gyp 910'�afpll • ,� d'�4� yp • , 1 � �yCi � yA Rhett's River z` Grill & Raw' Bar • Rezone 277.5 acres from R1 -Residential to NMD- Neighborhood Model District • Minimum of 800 and maximum of 1550 residential units • Minimum of 50,000 and maximum of 130,000 square feet of non- residential • Open space, trails, parks, multi -modal transportation, and civic areas • Elementary School site • Street connections: Polo Grounds Road (two connections), Ashwood Blvd, Route 29, and Montgomery Ridge • High School or other Institutional use site • Rio Mills road connection to Berkmar Extended PROPOSAL Rh j i PRONpE PAPNIN�AN INFORMATIONNpE O Non PEOE wlvRa �21 FOR EST LAKES IhE yf f slTe iV�� ME T�� E I �PPaiMmrE uFs,-, BLDCK2 \ ILII 1 u Ru R RWA.� D - - - - - - -- CB) o a � PELOPE 1 �I IF /1 vICINmMAP SCALE: CRNSFAL NOPd9 4�Il� _, b / of BLOCKiS T. Au _ - waxrvEu aRn � REN sv _ _FScaFa. 'E.ur rvc BLOCK iG I aw Q .0 �`� p ESgoTE mo r - Exn Nc wo vEnR - �' EMnPLoaoPLAumPr� ,L c7 \Q xLa. BLOC: Kg PRo-sER PRMTv� ~� H c i T. TPAII WAv _ E FB 7 _ IM i ` \ CE - - r, n� r' rucnra szory xc 9x_ &L 'i \ in a aFs nsrvnn BLOr CK iii -" E N. r _ r \ TTaraaor 11REn 1 Pri swNFnLL arrvwnv'/ (BLOCK iOin .no§E ^ "tui.. ns TcmL .,� a aoJ �- a ........... orosm ion uc cnF -1 M .rr,ravra REI` naM A�- \ orccxai nIur cuROAuOonM noo i -'° 1 MMELEoor-rvcow ,BLOCK i6rsgavcv xc N.—'MI Mr s l 1 ATuM E IsrN� �o.AR - r �r MRuILDOlEL,,IR TI FF PROPOSEDRIGHTIN RIGHiOu BLOCK4 l BLOCK \ `� -� rv15R5E[r On W r5' ! E f f I I' i urxR n wM, xxw¢F T. RIL onM Loon Eo uPSraEnM OF tai-,`' `;.,, RaaorrvEr,3E�TrvA. _ uEPR uc rr P J� -i„ �\ MUNI OMERV RIDGE EDRF u I Lrn oNn c ¢cc `` BLOCK 5' - _ _ i " r -DTE smsrACErs FaaT vc ij wsou = r BLOCKS I r r�II fi�n. �- NEIGHBORHOOD 1 - a nFrs—ra>vE,. ax .,\-R� x i~__ I 5 craorcmrFxoM M. orncavxec. Lm, "Al ri C' = (, I BLOCKi j �I Ew .oa rFn I/ Pah` /" �.� vFniEurT caouNosawo.uurxEcolvNEc*ouoFrn RnFro Ploopvuw mP.�',i PRIMITIve� moi" i z --_- I s nRusEPsxL. MTsxa..asxaoRs.sEo tea„ ,r�r�,T ar,s 11 I,.. SE f 1g n — N�Roslo N IGrvao �r 1 --C r n)R`�j� . +- j.� BLOCK a7 " iTS oF),�or�Eo�EZ94 NG -f15r L� / T x a BLOCKq-"i E Ro�.nHIII L aEtlx LOCKS ' BLOCKS i 7( _---�� I I > \ cnTFnxn RPrnrvorTxc . AIE SLOFF i IBJ f / I - o-oxTOMROLME. 1 ILI 1— ESTa oR FnF. -' , px E,",1-1- 11111 .SEA Px� a Amp, EIaaT°R 5 /N, ID IT H11-11 �1111E—E-:., ®a ,T ® oNrvERorvPo Tss�aLta�LYeEA n 4 ��C>" va<cnnosmr —11aou,EsnnorncinaonTHcsnc. NCTe nu sTortmwn*°°^^^"^GFr.^E"T FALL ES NOTE aNEn,mTNwl TrvE woB 0 'IE f TjI (Il -6 - L 1—TO—EIDE D—E PRE BGQCK 8, �I �"`- eon pnnrlTrr., j _ Fa = ry ESEa`eoswrEs it `.. �1 BLOCK7 i gG ��- Ens ALE oPs L - Tl TEo \� pFJEL PME �FIXI DING YFAR - \j t f ACm ROAN wN , gAG�'(tbVAL A T rl M y® FORESTEe (1 `ry �' "A, n ' � fn"! ( __ /.`mar.Lrssra[.atuEosior[mrncTs ' IN, E3.,11'IT n a'rs crags eeooe,3rr <enrvnvaonr"ElI or A HEp oa w u rvEEo LL N M u /nMn noo m I _ _ ✓ j �' „: an E u _ PRMT,cTaA LwA. KORTH SIDE 0- POLO EaauNos aonp ' V 1 , / A""' TOT cal 'ITHiC,Eowrn,uusrssavcs IMPROVEGINTERSE N } f rvrLyuEE wpK 'L� A SEEEEDOKH rOL N�AbS R`'SopNNpANER Dee• wnrvawowrrnoorury FlpRN i— / �•^� LmF lS ` * �nTorvoFrvETORCREEo N ELOEEPRESER E NE vErxErrrvuv GRAPHC S(,' AT T' `� O PRuuv use Pnnon oTc resanLe SFO d3 vvPpvtn rry Pnrr< 'n�aN[OkV�ONhT 1 f m ' \\ / ®PRD EE r0[PTOM1aFH5T0A[MR�R1111 APPLICATION PLAN i y i4M mp j6 i i 'rya I - LAND USE PLAN bm At Bill M� WL r MA lk v ��Onc* t a Land Use Map m .mft --N�A County -owned property Y- r Pr g" A ppi Icatlo n Plan ASHWOOD CONNECTOR 0 IN i m P LEGEND E 11 N G TOPOGRAPHv ROPOBEo vEAa FLaooPLn,n lMooeLFo)& - 'O _+ �\ RpSEpON MPRWEMENTS iD POLO GROUNDS ROAD _-� Tho PROPOBED GRADING r r m m FE AA FLOODPLAM LIMIT — — — — PPOP05EDwo-YEARFLOODPLAIN BASED ON JFEN ED - TOPOGRAPHYDPTHEPROPERTY - _ PROPOSED»rvVEAR—DPLAIN MODELED&BASED - ONIMPROVEMENFSTOPOLDGRONNOSROAD AN—EMOVEDFROMFEMAI—o- EARFLOODPLAIN iT BASED ONMDOELEDT YEAR FL00DPLAIN& 1 I DPOATEDTDPOGRAPHVOFTHEPROPERTY A—FFILLWITHIH PROP05EG MODELED a—YEAR �4 IEGEN� _ Fxs„NGTopoGR„aN. \ \ PROPOSeDSRADNs e FE— venaaaoonu uuMT - - 1 >_ _ T _ _ _ vo nrz000PLUN MooELeoaegs[o - f .'ar iao-VEnR ONO NPROVEMENTSTO POLO GROUNO5Rono 1 I a TI - / / �\ \- pRRA PEMOVED NiOM FEMAroo-VEARF�OonnN� #. \ \\ BASEDON MOaELtu>ao-vFAR rL00DPLNNS DPo..W,oPo�RAPH.a.TNEPRDmEarr F I I sl \\ �\�� - HNPROPOSEO MooELEo morcnR - ` _T '- , f / PVSio \ (: X�m PAIS tl,r: raoaos uxuwxrenmrvxwwnn� --=LOixO[NDE KAg- 9nsroon uoawrx[msTaa xuuxnaex asrem raeoownvl _ , / /j ♦.; PR^.vo55p�narenna� e — ch.vlu: scnLN NL �r SPECIAL USE PERMIT Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the Board adopt: 1. The Resolution authorizing the Ashwood Boulevard connection (Attachment I) 2. The Ordinance approving the rezoning (Attachment J) 3. The Resolution approving the special use permit (Attachment K), subject to the conditions attached thereto. RECOMMENDATION a IN 61 r r }} xoynds ljtS. IN - LAND USE PLAN V Mk� �oll-1 ,yp,B a Rh j i PRONpE PAPNIN�AN INFORMATIONNpE O Non PEOE wlvRa �21 FOR EST LAKES IhE yf f slTe iV�� ME T�� E I �PPaiMmrE uFs,-, BLDCK2 \ ILII 1 u Ru R RWA.� D - - - - - - -- CB) o a � PELOPE 1 �I IF /1 vICINmMAP SCALE: CRNSFAL NOPd9 4�Il� _, b / of BLOCKiS T. Au _ - waxrvEu aRn � REN sv _ _FScaFa. 'E.ur rvc BLOCK iG I aw Q .0 �`� p ESgoTE mo r - Exn Nc wo vEnR - �' EMnPLoaoPLAumPr� ,L c7 \Q xLa. BLOC: Kg PRo-sER PRMTv� ~� H c i T. TPAII WAv _ E FB 7 _ IM i ` \ CE - - r, n� r' rucnra szory xc 9x_ &L 'i \ in a aFs nsrvnn BLOr CK iii -" E N. r _ r \ TTaraaor 11REn 1 Pri swNFnLL arrvwnv'/ (BLOCK iOin .no§E ^ "tui.. ns TcmL .,� a aoJ �- a ........... orosm ion uc cnF -1 M .rr,ravra REI` naM A�- \ orccxai nIur cuROAuOonM noo i -'° 1 MMELEoor-rvcow ,BLOCK i6rsgavcv xc N.—'MI Mr s l 1 ATuM E IsrN� �o.AR - r �r MRuILDOlEL,,IR TI FF PROPOSEDRIGHTIN RIGHiOu BLOCK4 l BLOCK \ `� -� rv15R5E[r On W r5' ! E f f I I' i urxR n wM, xxw¢F T. RIL onM Loon Eo uPSraEnM OF tai-,`' `;.,, RaaorrvEr,3E�TrvA. _ uEPR uc rr P J� -i„ �\ MUNI OMERV RIDGE EDRF u I Lrn oNn c ¢cc `` BLOCK 5' - _ _ i " r -DTE smsrACErs FaaT vc ij wsou = r BLOCKS I r r�II fi�n. �- NEIGHBORHOOD 1 - a nFrs—ra>vE,. ax .,\-R� x i~__ I 5 craorcmrFxoM M. orncavxec. Lm, "Al ri C' = (, I BLOCKi j �I Ew .oa rFn I/ Pah` /" �.� vFniEurT caouNosawo.uurxEcolvNEc*ouoFrn RnFro Ploopvuw mP.�',i PRIMITIve� moi" i z --_- I s nRusEPsxL. MTsxa..asxaoRs.sEo tea„ ,r�r�,T ar,s 11 I,.. SE f 1g n — N�Roslo N IGrvao �r 1 --C r n)R`�j� . +- j.� BLOCK a7 " iTS oF),�or�Eo�EZ94 NG -f15r L� / T x a BLOCKq-"i E Ro�.nHIII L aEtlx LOCKS ' BLOCKS i 7( _---�� I I > \ cnTFnxn RPrnrvorTxc . AIE SLOFF i IBJ f / I - o-oxTOMROLME. 1 ILI 1— ESTa oR FnF. -' , px E,",1-1- 11111 .SEA Px� a Amp, EIaaT°R 5 /N, ID IT H11-11 �1111E—E-:., ®a ,T ® oNrvERorvPo Tss�aLta�LYeEA n 4 ��C>" va<cnnosmr —11aou,EsnnorncinaonTHcsnc. NCTe nu sTortmwn*°°^^^"^GFr.^E"T FALL ES NOTE aNEn,mTNwl TrvE woB 0 'IE f TjI (Il -6 - L 1—TO—EIDE D—E PRE BGQCK 8, �I �"`- eon pnnrlTrr., j _ Fa = ry ESEa`eoswrEs it `.. �1 BLOCK7 i gG ��- Ens ALE oPs L - Tl TEo \� pFJEL PME �FIXI DING YFAR - \j t f ACm ROAN wN , gAG�'(tbVAL A T rl M y® FORESTEe (1 `ry �' "A, n ' � fn"! ( __ /.`mar.Lrssra[.atuEosior[mrncTs ' IN, E3.,11'IT n a'rs crags eeooe,3rr <enrvnvaonr"ElI or A HEp oa w u rvEEo LL N M u /nMn noo m I _ _ ✓ j �' „: an E u _ PRMT,cTaA LwA. KORTH SIDE 0- POLO EaauNos aonp ' V 1 , / A""' TOT cal 'ITHiC,Eowrn,uusrssavcs IMPROVEGINTERSE N } f rvrLyuEE wpK 'L� A SEEEEDOKH rOL N�AbS R`'SopNNpANER Dee• wnrvawowrrnoorury FlpRN i— / �•^� LmF lS ` * �nTorvoFrvETORCREEo N ELOEEPRESER E NE vErxErrrvuv GRAPHC S(,' AT T' `� O PRuuv use Pnnon oTc resanLe SFO d3 vvPpvtn rry Pnrr< 'n�aN[OkV�ONhT 1 f m ' \\ / ®PRD EE r0[PTOM1aFH5T0A[MR�R1111 APPLICATION PLAN Should a Board Member choose to approve the resolution for the Ashwood Connection: • I move that the Board adopt the resolution in Attachment I authorizing the Ashwood Boulevard Connection. Should a Board Member choose to deny the Ashwood Connection: • Move to deny the authorization of the Ashwood Boulevard Connection (state reasons for denial). MOTION- ASHWOOD CONNECTION Should a Board Member choose approve this zoning map amendment: • I move that the Board adopt the ordinance in Attachment J approving ZMA2015-007 Brookhill. Should a Board Member choose to deny this zoning map amendment: • Move to deny ZMA 2015-00007, Brookhill (state reasons for denial). MOTION- REZONING Should a Board Member choose to approve this special use permit: • I move that the Board adopt the resolution in Attachment K approving SP2015- 025 Brookhill, subject to the conditions attached thereto. Should a Board Member choose to deny this special use permit: • Move to deny SP 2015-00025, Brookhill (state reasons for denial). MOTION- SPECIAL USE PERMIT PHASE II INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ry PHASE I INTERSECTION % • IMPROVEMENTS f F B) y [C1 PHASE II ROADWAY • IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS �lll t J r PHASE IV INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS v f LJ POLO GROUNDS feWtib a PHASE I INTERSECTION PHASE IV ROADWAY MPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS 7GUR ; BROOKH ILL TRA F G PHASING PLAN PHASE I INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION x # + CONSTRUCT (i) NEW WESTBOUND LEFT- TURN LANE ON POLO + GROUNDS ROAD WITK375' OF STORAGE. EXTEND WESTBOUND RIGHT -TURN LANE ON POLO GROUNDS ROAD i FROM So' OF STORAGE TO 200'OF STORAGE, CONVERT RIO MILLS ROAD TO A RIGHT IN 1 RIGHT -OUT OPERATION. INTERSECTION z + CONSTRUCT A SOUTHBOUNI) ROADWAY, PROVIDING (1) LEFT -TURN AND (z) RIGHT -TURN �. LANE. + CONSTRUCT AN EASTBOUND LEFT -TURN LANE ON POLO GROUNDS ROAD WITH i5c FEETOF STORAGE INTERSECTION 3 + CONSTRUCT A RIGHT IN I RIGHT OU ROADWAY ENTRANCETOROUTE zc + CON5TRUCTANOR74BOUNDRIGH' 1 TURN LANE ON US zg WITH zau'OF STORAGE. r� PHASE II INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION 4 CONSTRUCT NORTHBOUND ROADWAY TO PROVIDE (i}LEFT TURN LANE & (i) RIGHT -TURN LANE • RESTRIPE PAINTED MEDIAN TO PROVIDE WESTBOUND LEFT -TURN LANE ON A5HWOOD BOULEVARD # WITH ioo' OF STORAGE- • RESTRIPE EASTBOUNDASHWOOD ' BOULEVARD APPROACH TO PROVIG (i) RIGHT -TURN LANE PI IASE IV INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION 5 CONSTRUCTSOUTHBOUND ROADWAY TO PROVIDE (i)LEFT- TURN LANE AND (2) RIGHT -TURN LANE + CONSTRUCT AN EASTBOUND LEFT TURN LANE ON POLO GROUNDS ROADWAY WITH a.So' OF STORAGE. TIVIP46-s6 jr EPJTRArKr TQ*JAkky j ~ f 7MP46-14A TMP45-5B + R0CKYOALE CHAR1,0TTESVILLE + PROPOSEo ROAC CONNECTIOht QUARRY BETWEENRIO MILLS ROAD AND BE.RKMAR DRIVE TMP46-188 HORNELAND CORPORATION k .'f TMP46-iRP TMP45-60 H0RNE I -ANE) CORPORATION ! TMP46.28D CRAFTON CORPORATION it ri f FINAL AU GNMENT OF BERI(MAR +' DRIVE 70 BE C0N5TRUCTED BY zasp ? (PER VDOT s00%CONSTRUCTION PLANS} 11 TMP46-iSD CRAFTON / I CORPORATION f � FIGURE 0: RIO MILLS ROAD ROADWAY CONNECTION PROPOS Ea 6a+ ACRE HIGH SCHOOL SITE 4: V 4S TMP q6 -IRB HOMELAND CORPORATION �( TMP46-i86 CRAFTON CORPORATION F : BROOKHILL SCHOOL SITES EXHIBIT PROPOSEQ7ACRE ELEMENTARYSCHOOL ! SITE F: r b n2 } r V PROPOS Ea 6a+ ACRE HIGH SCHOOL SITE 4: V 4S TMP q6 -IRB HOMELAND CORPORATION �( TMP46-i86 CRAFTON CORPORATION F : BROOKHILL SCHOOL SITES EXHIBIT PROPOSEQ7ACRE ELEMENTARYSCHOOL ! SITE e A, 0 BROOKHILL ZMA2015=007 AND SP2015=025 PLANNING COMMISSION 8/16/16 :4543 CREEK tR/2 s— thabed 9� z±¥ _ � ., , _ + _ �/ ■ � ` Ilk UKF4 Ir 29 4t IF IN LOCATION 'r Monlicell❑ United Soccer Club R C M a€e i s C ti v' t 9� N a 0 • o ?I: . nt3ry Shoo l F a wir r r — i a YrO�r]aeUBlvd 0+i. 4 + i dL Albemarle -' Residential Services r� � f ��.lha�nridg�;Na3 `• n IL IkIkOo�, . ® AFggginearing ' t KOD€AKD. Rose Anne's.® 4 J perp GrOunds•Rd— `•gyp 910'�afpll • ,� d'�4� yp • , 1 � �yCi � yA Rhett's River z` Grill & Raw' Bar • Rezone 277.5 acres from R1 -Residential to NMD- Neighborhood Model District • Minimum of 800 and maximum of 1550 residential units • Minimum of 50,000 and maximum of 130,000 square feet of non- residential • Open space, trails, parks, multi -modal transportation, and civic areas • Elementary School site • Street connections: Polo Grounds Road (two connections), Ashwood Blvd, Route 29, and Montgomery Ridge • High School or other Institutional use site • Rio Mills road connection to Berkmar Extended PROPOSAL APPLICATION PLAN i y i4M mp j6 i i 'rya I - LAND USE PLAN bm At Bill M� WL r MA lk v ��Onc* t a • Grading and retaining wall heights • Preservation/treatment of the historic manor house • Timing and phasing of transportation improvements • Other outstanding technical issues with the proffers OUTSTANDING ISSUES • Special Use Permit for grading activities in the floodplain • Private street authorization (Sections 14-233 and 14-234). • Modification of street standards • 14-422(E)- Sidewalks along private streets serving amenity oriented lots • 14-422(F)- Planting strips along private streets serving amenity oriented lots SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND MODIFICATIONS Factors Favorable: 1. The rezoning request is consistent with the recommendations within the Places29 Master Plan. 2. All but one of the applicable Neighborhood Model principles are being addressed. 3. The proposal provides a number of improvements to mitigate impacts including: open space, greenway, trails, civic spaces, elementary school site, high school or institutional use property, transit stop, buffers, and multi -modal transportation. 4. Proposed improvement and cash proffers have been provided to mitigate impacts of the development. S. Affordable housing meeting the County's Affordable Housing Policy has been offered. Factors Unfavorable: 1. The proffers are in need of substantive and technical changes. 2. A commitment to ensure the protection and preservation of historic resources has not been adequately addressed. 3. In order to adequately meet all the Neighborhood Model principles, the grading section of the Code needs to be revised so that retaining walls follow the design standards for managed slopes as outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. FACTORS FOR CONSIDERATION a IN 61 r r }} xoynds ljtS. IN - LAND USE PLAN V Mk� �oll-1 ,yp,B a Should a Planning Commissioner choose to recommend approval of this zoning map amendment: • Move to recommend approval of ZMA 2015-00007, Brookhill with the changes as recommended by staff in Attachment G. Should a Planning Commissioner choose to recommend denial of this zoning map amendment: • Move to recommend denial of ZMA 2015-00007, Brookhill (state reasons for denial). MOTION- REZONING Should a Planning Commissioner choose to recommend approval of this special use permit: • Move to recommend approval of SP 2015-00025, Brookhill with the conditions as recommended by staff. Should a Planning Commissioner choose to recommend denial of this special use permit: • Move to recommend denial of SP 2015-00025, Brookhill (state reasons for denial). MOTION- SPECIAL USE PERMIT Should a Planning Commissioner choose to approve the private street request: • I move that the Commission authorize private streets for amenity oriented lots for the reasons stated in the staff report and in Attachment H. Should a Planning Commissioner choose to deny the private street request: • I move that the Commission deny the applicant's request to authorize private streets for amenity oriented lots for the following reasons: state the reasons) for denial. MOTION- PRIVATE STREET REQUEST Should a Planning Commissioner choose to approve the sidewalk modification request: • I move that the Commission grant an exception from the requirement for sidewalks on those private streets that serve amenity -oriented lots, for the reasons stated in Attachment H, subject to the following condition: 1. A five-foot wide sidewalk across the length of the amenity area shall be provided for access to and from the lots and shall connect to the sidewalk network along the public streets. Should a Planning Commissioner choose to deny the sidewalk modification request: • I move that the Commission deny the applicant's request for an exception from the requirement for sidewalks on those private streets that serve amenity - oriented lots, for the following reasons: state the reasons) for denial. MOTION- SIDEWALKS Should a Planning Commissioner choose to approve the planting strip modification request: • I move that the Commission grant an exception from the requirement for planting strips on those private streets that serve amenity -oriented lots, for the reasons stated in Attachment H. Should a Planning Commissioner choose to deny the planting strip modification request: • I move that the Commission deny the applicant's request for an exception from the requirement for planting strips on those private streets that serve amenity - oriented lots, for the following reasons: state the reasons) for denial, MOTION- PLANTING STRIP PHASE II INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ry PHASE I INTERSECTION % • IMPROVEMENTS f F B) y [C1 PHASE II ROADWAY • IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS �lll t J r PHASE IV INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS v f LJ POLO GROUNDS feWtib a PHASE I INTERSECTION PHASE IV ROADWAY MPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS 7GUR ; BROOKH ILL TRA F G PHASING PLAN PHASE I INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION x # + CONSTRUCT (i) NEW WESTBOUND LEFT- TURN LANE ON POLO + GROUNDS ROAD WITK375' OF STORAGE. EXTEND WESTBOUND RIGHT -TURN LANE ON POLO GROUNDS ROAD i FROM So' OF STORAGE TO 200'OF STORAGE, CONVERT RIO MILLS ROAD TO A RIGHT IN 1 RIGHT -OUT OPERATION. INTERSECTION z + CONSTRUCT A SOUTHBOUNI) ROADWAY, PROVIDING (1) LEFT -TURN AND (z) RIGHT -TURN �. LANE. + CONSTRUCT AN EASTBOUND LEFT -TURN LANE ON POLO GROUNDS ROAD WITH i5c FEETOF STORAGE INTERSECTION 3 + CONSTRUCT A RIGHT IN I RIGHT OU ROADWAY ENTRANCETOROUTE zc + CON5TRUCTANOR74BOUNDRIGH' 1 TURN LANE ON US zg WITH zau'OF STORAGE. r� PHASE II INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION 4 CONSTRUCT NORTHBOUND ROADWAY TO PROVIDE (i}LEFT TURN LANE & (i) RIGHT -TURN LANE • RESTRIPE PAINTED MEDIAN TO PROVIDE WESTBOUND LEFT -TURN LANE ON A5HWOOD BOULEVARD # WITH ioo' OF STORAGE- • RESTRIPE EASTBOUNDASHWOOD ' BOULEVARD APPROACH TO PROVIG (i) RIGHT -TURN LANE PI IASE IV INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION 5 CONSTRUCTSOUTHBOUND ROADWAY TO PROVIDE (i)LEFT- TURN LANE AND (2) RIGHT -TURN LANE + CONSTRUCT AN EASTBOUND LEFT TURN LANE ON POLO GROUNDS ROADWAY WITH a.So' OF STORAGE. TIVIP46-s6 jr EPJTRArKr TQ*JAkky j ~ f 7MP46-14A TMP45-5B + R0CKYOALE CHAR1,0TTESVILLE + PROPOSEo ROAC CONNECTIOht QUARRY BETWEENRIO MILLS ROAD AND BE.RKMAR DRIVE TMP46-188 HORNELAND CORPORATION k .'f TMP46-iRP TMP45-60 H0RNE I -ANE) CORPORATION ! TMP46.28D CRAFTON CORPORATION it ri f FINAL AU GNMENT OF BERI(MAR +' DRIVE 70 BE C0N5TRUCTED BY zasp ? (PER VDOT s00%CONSTRUCTION PLANS} 11 TMP46-iSD CRAFTON / I CORPORATION f � FIGURE 0: RIO MILLS ROAD ROADWAY CONNECTION PROPOS Ea 6a+ ACRE HIGH SCHOOL SITE 4: V 4S TMP q6 -IRB HOMELAND CORPORATION �( TMP46-i86 CRAFTON CORPORATION F : BROOKHILL SCHOOL SITES EXHIBIT PROPOSEQ7ACRE ELEMENTARYSCHOOL ! SITE F: r b n2 } r V PROPOS Ea 6a+ ACRE HIGH SCHOOL SITE 4: V 4S TMP q6 -IRB HOMELAND CORPORATION �( TMP46-i86 CRAFTON CORPORATION F : BROOKHILL SCHOOL SITES EXHIBIT PROPOSEQ7ACRE ELEMENTARYSCHOOL ! SITE e A, 0 ZMA2015-001 Old Trail Village O PLANNING COMMISSION 12/15/15 Proposal Request to amend the code of development, application plan, and proffers. Reduce the minimum density from 1,600 to 1,000 units to allow for market changes. Request to add Cluster Cottage unit, farm stands, and Tier I, II, and III Personal Wireless Facilities as uses. ❖ Request modifications: Private Street authorization Modification of street standards for amenity oriented lots Curb, curb and gutter Sidewalks Planting strips Modification of sign regulations Sign area Sign height M Application Plan NOTE: A SUBJECT ALWAYS TO THE :RECUIREMENTS, TERMS, AND PROVISIONS pF THE CODE OF DEVELOPMENT, THIS CONCEPNAi GENERAL DEVELOPMENT - PLAN SHOWS THE POTENTIAL OEV0.0PMENT DF INDIVIDUAL LOTS, EWLOINGS. AND- 'PANN:ING, HOWEVER THESE EL. SNTS PECIOF hEE CONCEPTUAL GENERAL INCLUDING -lYi PLAN ME ARE IJTON SAND DI ONLY. SOF BUILhINC COPD A KI LOTS, INCLUE -� '.THE LOCATIONSAND DIMENSIONS OF BUILDINGS AND PARKING, SHALL DE "_ DETERMINED ON AN INDIVIDUAL OASIS AT THE TIME OF 5UDDINSI ON PLAT AND \ \ - r] SITE PLAN SU[MITTAL AND APPROVAL FOR EACH "LOCK. THE PARAMETERS - ! '-1 ! KC FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EACH DLOCK ARE CONTAIN" THE THE CODE _ J-_ OF AHUPMENT, ENSURING THE GOALS OF NIT TRAIL NILLAGE ARE REAIJZEE, _ - MWk�ARK TS AND MANN ELIT'T FOR THE COMM UNIN TO EVOLVE A$ NLEpE6 WHEN - - I CRAPHTC 5C MARKETS AND 6EMAN05 CHANCE. � �� A - ,>_ - iX-HNC ��6 Ta EAM n f.q BloCk 31 F i o' - _ plNg MA PAYED SIDRY�_4LOK TE, ! :! - F31oek 30 �Ea ITT--T— Bloc nCN -- 91 UFFER l T Na s cvy ee6 xa eqs. Block 16 Block 17 Block i8 :' ® re I+NI�ONI—ID"mscl�w-i,s-�l.`� 1 _ Block IO NGORESTPU ANEW N THE h'IREAN LLFFFR5 r "io'6 PflEBE DTA NAERAl180 9TAEET TREEg TO , . h` E➢LANTPO ALQryN OkM TRAk S � APPLICANTI-PO SHSLEFORODMPLETKRI OP UNITS Or - T THEMTIGATION OF GLtl YC oxry BREAM g11FFEx /R I `} HH -IN THISLO-PN I F T. Lplx, Block L) / a C. 4 Block 24 Block � ryf � 19 ti I � Block 2l� � \ � N Block i ^' i. .� �I Block 33 � B lock 5 �` EE s 3P 1 Block" Block 32 � �� R f M 0.OtlTEY1HEEOYdlimwrf HUP R -J ,.J. rvi'ialp{ 1i8"E6INTINO FOREBT£D MAINTA�IEOQ TME3&Atj WHCry PRE �{a AN 6956Np1,I111IIRFEEAYEO ANO �. 0. Block 7 \: ruiwENfiLV OfIF�aRESTFiiIA'•TWENTY 1mi. �= C uE00T, OEEPRE 9NAI3C®E i A '„ 89N�'OIAS8v agEg 10' 26; �\ 1NTIIPCgpE9FbE4ELAPME�. i Block 22 l' lock 27 +oa srREAm . su FER 9 yo TH - ! t /'�\ � _ i � .I :x � ✓✓ p � � i Phu I V LEGEND � t J,, EXISTING GRADING l i i .—�% `-- i -- 1�, .-'r - �` - • •" a00TEAR FLOOD PLAIN 1-Uns Application Plan WJNTY TO MI.vE AS IXEDE0 WHEN - - GRArHIC E:CS[3 / %�' ��`� ,■,-,� : fir' '�- n's wr I I,RPwrP . 4w n Apt lilnrk 31ecpH Errrw ro EF81eYO MY�eloe[YRiEK 4lONG �1 Block 30= ?' a*.M-OR OGp0 00MECT*113 't PAT.—I'T CONNEC11— - y.:: •'y maLmoou lo•neN[!E. [ANeeCAPEAwR9e - - - - cwrotlro� E�mnr.a .krxa. i3lock 17 '' , Block 18 Block 10': Block 16 P}nlzrR:nooNwECTlollmsc�pp�s. '� �$-�. @esriNo Pd1ERiO AIliA, nl TfE aiRFrllEilFFMa '.• r - ''�! ��l ARfihERY604A MAMiAElERf, eiRRTTAxea� 9E PCANr® ALONG PLA TAWLGNAIE. APPLICANT Aw REss'PIL°ABLE rOH COWLFTIOU OF THE Nr[IOAnCw OFO!D T bTRFAAf ANfPEEN - MPACTS M 55UDCA LaCAT%111 �' �feFY _ _ • r' I l3kl k G 20 F ` /i •, knock 7 Black 26 lock 27 • =�•d ., tip �:: r r '7�� dpP' Block 19 [Ita� 1 1, 'Ck24 "ice BIL><k ? 5 Block 2 1. z� R n► i- I ., I Block Bloch 33 J Block 5 `i B 34'; #4P ++grrrE aroc&1llmaR a�li-Ea` .ARREB eNRIM TAS.. �EISnNa iLkiFJ' t reNrrAeNeo. M mESE nxe0 xwKH as (J .. etimeENn.v �NRORESi(4,.E TwENrY (: ,'��I WO'r PFEP 1lpGgRq�y 54NLi �E i � 1 .PiANnfu%,N9 LVNTiM.E0.A33PECil1 f f Block 22 _ IH THE CCoE or Pi4ELP~W1. I I'H'v 'H iPl:R ILLSfR�p. IHl: PI4.H ARI /f�,1( - •Y514�. _feel ,R.w • Hs irµc [Elio of � ` � +�=. •ti f' k. W4Lg})I�45TNfCIfA 1. t ![uYLk RY-H'r1Pk5 TNY.RN:H1'Ri nrM[-1.1111{a1116W AL>lYlt'AI LEGEND — — Factors for Consideration Factors Favorable: The rezoning amendment is consistent with the Crozet Master Plan. The rezoning amendment incorporates the previously approved variations that are within the blocks proposed to be amended, and simplifies and clarifies the COD and Plan so that it is easier to interpret for staff, the general public, and the applicant. The Cluster Cottage unit type allows for an additional housing type that could provide more opportunities for affordable housing. Factors Unfavorable: Changes are needed to the Code of Development and the Application Plan to allow each to be in final form for Board approval. Recommendation for ZMA Staff recommends approval of this rezoning amendment ZMA201500001, Old Trail Village with amended code of development and application plan and provided revisions are made as indicated in Attachment G prior to the Board of Supervisors meeting. M Recommendation for Modification Requests Staff recommends the following in regards to the modifications: Private streets: 1. The portion of Street B located behind Block 6 be revised in the Plan and COD to be shown as a public street. 2. Denial of the request for a portion of Street H as a private street. 3. Denial of the request for additional private street approval for those streets not shown on the Plan or COD. 4. Approval of private streets serving amenity oriented lots. 5. Approval of Streets T, L, N, P, and the portion of B that serves Blocks 5 and 20 as private streets. Modification of street standards: 1. Curb and Gutter: Staff recommends that curb only be provided along the private streets serving amenity oriented lots. 2. Sidewalks: Staff recommends approval of the sidewalk exception for the private streets serving amenity oriented lots only with the following condition: o A five foot sidewalk across the length of the amenity area shall be provided for access to and from the lots and connect to the sidewalk network along the public and private streets. 3. Planting strips: Staff recommends approval of the planting strip exception for the private streets serving amenity oriented lots only. Modification of sign regulations: 1. Staff recommends approval of the sign modifications for area and height as shown in Attachment F. Action for Rezoning Request Motions for the Rezoning Request - 0 Should a Planning Commissioner choose to recommend approval of this zoning map amendment: I move that the Commission recommend approval of ZMA 2015-00001 Old Trail Village, with the revised proffers dated November 2, 2015 as set forth in Attachment D, the proposed amendments to the code of development as set forth in Attachment B, and the proposed amendments to the application plan, last revised November 2, 2015, subject to any minor technical revisions recommended by staff before the matter is scheduled for consideration by the Board of Supervisors. Should a Planning Commissioner choose to recommend denial of this zoning map amendment: I move that the Commission not recommend approval of ZMA 2015-00001 Old Trail Village for the following reasons: state the reason(s) for recommending denial. Action for Private Street Authorization #1 Motions: I move that the Commission authorize private streets as follows for the reasons stated in the staff report and in Attachment H: The portion of Street B located that serves Blocks 5 and 20; provided that the portion of Street B located behind Block 6 be designated on the application plan and in the code of development as a public street. Streets T, L, N, and P and those serving amenity -oriented lots. I move that the Commission deny the applicant's request to authorize any portion of Street H as a private street because the applicant has failed to identify which portion it has requested to be private, and for the additional reasons stated in Attachment H. I move that the Commission deny the applicant's request to authorize other streets not shown on the application plan or referred to in the code of development as private streets, for the reasons stated in Attachment H. Action for Street Standards: curb and gutter Motions: I move that the Commission grant an exception from the requirement to install gutters on private streets that serve amenity -oriented lots, for the reasons stated in Attachment H. I move that the Commission deny an exception from the requirement to install curbs on private streets that serve -amenity oriented lots, for the reasons stated in Attachment H. Action for Street Standards: sidewalks Motions: I move that the Commission grant an exception from the requirement for sidewalks on those private streets that serve amenity -oriented lots, for the reasons stated in Attachment H, subject to the following condition: 1. A five-foot wide sidewalk across the length of the amenity area shall be provided for access to and from the lots and shall connect to the sidewalk network along the public and private streets. I move that the Commission deny the applicant's request for an exception from the requirement for sidewalks on those private streets that serve amenity - oriented lots, for the following reasons: state the reason(s) for denial. M Action for Street Standards: planting strips Motions: I move that the Commission grant an exception from the requirement for planting strips on those private streets that serve amenity -oriented lots, for the reasons stated in Attachment H. I move that the Commission deny the applicant's request for an exception from the requirement for planting strips on those private streets that serve amenity - oriented lots, for the following reasons: state the reason(s) for denial. Action Motions: or Special Exception: freestanding sign area --------------- 0 --------------- I move that the Commission recommend approval of a special exception to increase the maximum sign area for monument -style freestanding signs using multi -sided theme panels as depicted in Attachment F from 32 square feet to 64 square feet per sign, plus bonus tenant panels as provided in County Code §18-4.15.1o(a)(8), for the reasons stated in Attachment H. I move that the Commission recommend denial of a special exception to increase the maximum sign area for monument -style freestanding signs using multi -sided theme panels as depicted in Attachment F from 32 square feet to 64 square feet per sign, plus bonus tenant panels as provided in County Code §18-4.15.1o(a)(8), for the following reasons: state the reason(s) for denial. M Action Motions: or Special Exception: freestanding sign heightOO I move that the Commission recommend approval of a special exception to increase the maximum sign height for monument -style freestanding signs using multi -sided theme panels as depicted in Attachment F from 12 feet to 16 feet, for the reasons stated in Attachment H. I move that the Commission recommend approval of a special exception to increase the maximum sign height for monument -style freestanding signs using multi -sided theme panels as depicted in Attachment F from 12 feet to 16 feet, for the following reasons: state the reasons) for denial. M Action Motions: I r Special Exception: subdivision sign area --------------- 0 --------------- I move that the Commission recommend approval of a special exception to increase the maximum sign area for monument -style subdivision signs using multi -sided theme panels as depicted in Attachment F from 24 square feet to 64 square feet, for the reasons stated in Attachment H. I move that the Commission recommend denial of a special exception to increase the maximum sign area for monument -style subdivision signs using multi -sided theme panels as depicted in Attachment F from 24 square feet to 64 square feet, for the following reasons: state the reason(s) for denial. M Action Motions: I r Special Exception: subdivision sign height -------------------- f_ -N 1111��Ij -------------------- I move that the Commission recommend approval of a special exception to increase the maximum sign height for monument -style subdivision signs using multi -sided theme panels as depicted in Attachment F from 6 feet to 16 feet, for the reasons stated in Attachment H. I move that the Commission recommend denial of a special exception to increase the maximum sign height for monument -style subdivision signs using multi -sided theme panels as depicted in Attachment F from 6 feet to 16 feet, for the following reasons: state the reasons) for denial. M �I r