HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201600160 Staff Report 2017-01-30ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB-2016-160: North Pointe Northwest Residential Area
Review Type
Final Review of a Site Development Plan
Parcel Identification
Tax Map 32, Parcel 22K
Location
Located on the east side of Rt. 29 North, across from Lewis and Clark Drive
Zoned
Planned Development Mixed Commercial (PDMC), Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
Neighborhood Investments — NP LLC/Collins Engineering (Scott Collins)
Magisterial District
Rivanna
Proposal
To construct 2-3 story townhouses in 27 blocks of 3-8 units, with associated site improvements, including roads, parking lots, stormwater management facilities,
landscaping and retaining walls.
Context
The Northwest Residential Area is situated at the north end of the North Pointe development and is accessed, and divided, by Lewis & Clark Drive. Block 1 is located
closest to the Route 29 Entrance Corridor at approximately 200' away. The stormwater facilities previously reviewed by the ARB are located at the north and south ends
of the residential development. The entrance to the University of Virginia Research Park is across Rt. 29 to the west.
Visibility
The proposed townhouse development will be visible from the Route 29 Entrance Corridor. Topography will allow the upper parts of some townhouses to be visible
above units located at lower elevations.
ARB Meeting Date
February 6, 2017
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
' ' 0a1BE"811K'sto]'A'1
DATE
APPLICATION/
REVIEW TYPE
RESULT
12-27-2016
SUB-2016-196
Road plans for the Northwest Residential Area were submitted and are under review.
4-18-2011
ARB-2011-27
The ARB completed a preliminary review of the Northwest Residential Area. The action letter from this meeting is included as Attachment A to this report.
The comments from the meeting are also included in the Analysis section of this report.
4-1-2011
ARB-2011-10
A Certificate of Appropriateness was issued for stormwater management facilities #10 and #11. No final engineering approval was granted for these facilities.
2-14-2007
SP-2006-34
A Special Use Permit for a stream crossing was approved.
12-18-2006
ARB-2006-129
The ARB provided advisory comments on the Special Use Permit application for the stream crossing.
4-19-2004
ARB-2004-26
The ARB completed an advisory review for the North Pointe rezoning.
ANALYSIS
REF
GUIDELINE
4/18/2011 ARB COMMENTS
CURRENT ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the
Revise the rear elevations of
Townhouse blocks 14, 18, 21, 24, 25, 26, and
Revise the site plan to
designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that new development within the
blocks 14, 18, 21, and 24 to
27 are oriented with their backs to the EC.
include a note indicating
corridors reflects the traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the
incorporate forms and features
Some of the townhouse blocks beyond those
the manufacturer and
purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that proposed development
that will make the townhouses
listed also have rear elevations facing the
color of the proposed
within the designated Entrance Corridors reflect elements of design
more compatible with
EC, but lower portions of those walls will be
retaining wall block.
characteristic of the significant historical landmarks, buildings, and
Albemarle's historic buildings.
blocked by the lower blocks. These rear
Revise the previously
structures of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote orderly
elevations still have a lesser degree of detail
proposed gray block to a
and attractive development within these corridors. Applicants should note that
Provide material and color
than the front elevations, but they have been
tan/brown color.
replication of historic structures is neither required nor desired.
samples.
revised to include varying levels of brick at
the ground floor, some gable elements at the
Consider somewhat
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and
Albemarle area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and
See retaining wall comments,
roof, some dormers, and shutters on some
darker earth tones for the
vegetation. In order to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and
below.
windows. These features add a degree of
Hardi-siding.
vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines require attention to
interest to the elevations and a minimal
four primary factors: compatibility with significant historic sites in the area;
connection to historic residential building
the character of the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and
types, though not specific to Albemarle
landscaping.
County. The rear elevations still clearly look
like the backs of buildings.
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect
the traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings in the
Charlottesville and Albemarle area.
Material/color lists are provided on the
elevation drawings and photocopies of the
4
The examples contained in Appendix A (of the guidelines) should be used as
a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's
proposed materials have been provided.
historic structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new
Samples of the brick and siding are available
development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the
from previous submittals. The brick has
area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of
shades of red and brown and it is expected to
compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which
have an appropriate appearance. The siding
may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
colors are generally on the light side, and
traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate
will contrast with the brick and shutter
varying tastes as well as special functional requirements.
colors. Somewhat darker earth tones could
help the development blend more into the
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials,
colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the
surroundings. No shingle sample has been
significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to)
provided, but the charcoal color is consistent
the buildings described in Appendix A. The standard of compatibility can be
with other approvals and is expected to be
met through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in
appropriate.
architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of
important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these
Photos of retaining walls have been provided
guidelines.
as an example of the proposed walls, but the
manufacturer and color are not noted on the
plan. A block sample was submitted for the
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be
integral to the building and site design.
previous ARB review, but it is primarily
gray. Walls using block in shades of tan or
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms,
shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole.
brown have a more coordinated appearance
in the ECs.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be
-
The townhouses are joined in blocks of 3 - 8
None.
used to unify groups of buildings within a development.
units. Arcades and colonnades are not
proposed.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the
-
Townhouses like these may have been built
None.
requirements of the Guidelines.
in other locations, but they do not have the
appearance of trademark buildings.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly
-
The window glass to be used in these
None.
reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following
residential units is not expected to be highly
criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 40%. Visible
tinted or reflective.
light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed
window glass should be submitted with the application for final review.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be
Revise the rear elevations of
The site sections have been revised to
None.
relieved using design detail or vegetation, or both.
blocks 14, 18, 21, and 24 to
coordinate building heights with the
incorporate forms and features
elevation drawings. The view from the EC is
that will make the townhouses
across a lower woodland preservation area to
more compatible with
blocks of townhouses with ground floor
Albemarle's historic buildings.
elevations that generally increase from west
to east.
Revise the site sections to show
building height that matches the
architectural elevations.
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall
Eliminate chain link from within
Chain link has been eliminated from the
Revise all fence notes on
plan of development and shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with the
500' of the EC. Provide fence
proposal and has been replaced with a 42"
the plan to have
building designs used on the site.
details in the site plan set for
review. Ensure that the security
high black metal fence (Majestic Aegis Plus
Ameristar). A photo of this fence is included
consistent wording with
clear reference to the
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance
Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a
fence design(s) is consistent with
on Sheet 5. The fence is one previously
fence detail. If multiple
negative visual impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be
a design that was previously
approved by the ARB. Fences are proposed
fence types are proposed,
provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse
approved by the ARB for this
on the retaining walls and west of the
add the relevant detail(s)
areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, f. Above -ground utilities,
purpose. Chain link fence may be
travelway that is located west of Buildings
and clarify all the notes.
and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire, and similar security fencing
acceptable beyond 500' with
25-27. Notes on the plan refer to the fence in
devices.
appropriate screening, subject to
ARB review and approval. (This
a variety of ways: 42" high fencing, 42" high
black security fencing, and a decorative
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and
surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings,
was also a condition of the April
fence around stormwater basin B. For clarity,
and c. Fencing.
2, 2011 CofA review)
the notes should use consistent wording that
matches the fence detail.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan:
Add to following note the site plan
The note does not appear on the plans.
Add the standard
"Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be
and the architectural plan:
mechanical equipment
eliminated."
"Visibility of all mechanical
note to the site and
equipment from the Entrance
architectural plans.
Corridor shall be eliminated."
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended to
Terrace retaining walls 6' in
Retaining walls are mostly limited to 6' in
Correct the identification
reflect the landscaping characteristic of many of the area's significant
height and taller over 150' in
height and are terraced. Planting is provided
of the eastern red cedar at
historic sites which is characterized by large shade trees and lawns.
length. Provide planting along the
on the terraces. At stormwater facility #10
stormwater facility #10.
Landscaping should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor and
terraces. Plant the slope on the
(the southern one) the landscaping is similar
help to integrate buildings into the existing environment of the corridor.
EC side of Blocks 14, 18, 21 and
24. Provide a mix of trees and
to what was approved with ARB -2011-10.
Shrubs were added to the terraces, which
Revise the Sargent
juniper at the retaining
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting
different types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such
shrubs and revise the grading as
increases the variety of the planting.
walls to a taller -growing
common elements allow for more flexibility in the design of structures
necessary to accommodate the
However, the shrubs include Sargent juniper.
shrub.
because common landscape features will help to harmonize the appearance
planting.
This juniper grows only 1 %2' tall, so it won't
of development as seen from the street upon which the Corridor is centered.
have much visual impact. Also, the red cedar
appear to be labeled as white pines.
Limit retaining wall
height at stormwater
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long
facility #11 to 61.
buildings as necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The
Retaining walls have been added at
spacing, size, and type of such trees or vegetation should be determined by
stormwater facility #11. They are identified
Revise the quantity of
the length, height, and blankness of such walls.
as a maximum height of 8', and there is only
plants at stormwater
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures;
4' of planting area available between the
facility #I I to be
dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service
walls. Only shrubs — no trees — are proposed
consistent with the
areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height.
on the terraces. There is also a reduced
previous ARB approval.
number of plants on the EC side of the
facility, and a third fewer plants on the east
Increase the quantity of
side. White pines and Sargent juniper are
shrubs on the slope on the
also proposed at the terraces.
EC side of Buildings 14,
18, 21 and 24 and revise
25 trees and 8 groups of shrubs are proposed
to a taller growing
on the slope located on the EC side of
species.
Buildings 14, 18, 21 and 24. Some of the tree
symbols on the plan (MV, UP and CJ) aren't
Add a mix of trees to fill
included in the landscape schedule, so a
the gap on the slope at
complete review isn't possible. However,
Buildings 14 and 18.
there is a 60' gap in the planting at Buildings
14 and 18, and the shrubs won't have much
Revise the plant schedule
impact due to small size and low quantity.
to show shrub planting
The proposed slope of the ground in this area
height at 24" minimum.
has not changed.
Add the MV, UP and CJ
Some shrub planting sizes are listed as
to the plant schedule.
gallons rather than heights. Shrub planting
height should be a minimum of 24".
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include
The Rt. 29 frontage of the property is not
Provide landscaping
the following:
shown consistently in the plans. A retaining
along the Rt. 29 frontage
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor
wall is proposed along the frontage, and a
to meet EC guidelines
Street. Such trees should be at least 3 %2 inches caliper (measured 6 inches
40' landscaped buffer along the frontage is a
and buffer requirements.
above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such
requirement of the rezoning. This plan does
trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center.
not show frontage landscaping. It appears
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be
that the current location of the retaining wall
interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The
limits the ability to provide standard frontage
ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They
planting and the 40' buffer.
may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern.
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone
wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor
street.
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and
fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and
exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
Revise the median plantings to
Trees are provided along Lewis and Clark
None.
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees
meet VDOT requirements while
Drive at 40' on center (more or less). The
should be at least 2'/z inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground)
providing a continuous informal
mix of trees requested has been provided in
and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be
mix of large, medium and small
the medians. Smaller planting sizes are
located at least every 40 feet on center.
deciduous trees ranging from one
proposed beyond 400' from the intersection
and one half inches (1'/2") to two
with Rt. 29. This was acceptable in the
and one half inches (2'/2") caliper.
previous ARB review.
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
Sidewalks are provided along the townhouse
None.
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian ways.
blocks. Where interior parking lot trees are
Such trees should be at least 2%2 inches caliper (measured six inches above
provided, they are located close to the
the ground) and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees
sidewalks, but trees are not proposed along
should be located at least every 25 feet on center.
all sidewalks.
3
Landscaping of parking areas:
420 parking spaces are proposed, but they
Provide perimeter
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet on
are not grouped in large parking lots. Parking
parking lot trees, 40' on
center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of
spaces are provided at each townhouse and
center, at the small
one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly
small groups of parking spaces are added in
groups of parking spaces.
distributed throughout the interior of the parking area.
8 other locations. Perimeter trees are not
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2%2 inches
consistently provided for these small groups.
caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced;
and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be planted
in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and
shall be protected by curbing.
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's
impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in
height.
37
Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff
The plants appear on the various lists, but
Add MV, UP and CJ to
based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended
some plant symbols on the plan (MV, UP
the plant schedule.
Species List and Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D).
and CJ) are not keyed to the schedule.
38
Plant health: The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All
Add the following note to the
Sheet 11 now includes the note. However,
Reduce the quantity of
site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be
landscape plans: "All site
406 Steeds Holly (IC) are proposed in the
Steeds Holly (and all
maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and
plantings of trees and shrubs shall
development. This quantity exceeds 25% of
shrubs) to not exceed
trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the
be allowed to reach, and be
the total shrub count. Limiting the quantity to
25% of the total shrub
plant."
maintained at, mature height; the
less than 25% could help support a healthy
count.
topping of trees is prohibited.
landscape.
Shrubs and trees shall be pruned
minimally and only to support the
overall health of the plant."
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and
Terrace retaining walls 6' in
See comments listed above.
See recommendations
should contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This
height and taller over 150' in
listed above.
may be accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and
length. Provide planting along the
rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and
terraces. Plant the slope on the
pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect native forest elements;
EC side of Blocks 14, 18, 21 and
insuring that any grading will blend into the surrounding topography thereby
24. Provide a mix of trees and
creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, existing
shrubs and revise the grading as
significant river and stream valleys which may be located on the site and
necessary to accommodate the
integrating these features into the design of surrounding development; and
planting.
limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the
natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor.
Revise the rear elevations of
blocks 14, 18, 21, and 24 to
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor
street and to other development within the corridor should be as follows:
incorporate forms and features
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be
that will make the townhouses
parallel to the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the
more compatible with
Entrance Corridor street.
Albemarle's historic buildings.
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity
within the Entrance Corridor.
Plant the slope on the EC side of
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys,
Blocks 14, 18, 21 and 24. Provide
steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical,
a mix of trees and shrubs and
then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the
revise the grading as necessary to
provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance
accommodate the planting.
apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to
maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from
Entrance Corridor streets.
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding
conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain
through the use of smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing
terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours
on the grading plan shall be rounded with a ten foot minimum radius where
they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather
than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when
necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape.
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into the
Provide an informal planting of
Four trees and ten shrubs are proposed in the
For locations on the
natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from the
mixed tree and shrub species and
referenced area on the south side of Lewis
slopes north and south of
Entrance Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the
sizes to compensate for removed
and Clark Drive. Five trees and 15 shrubs are
the Lewis and Clark
landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features.
vegetation, and low -growing
plants to stabilize slopes in the
proposed on the north side. The specified
shrubs have a mature height of only 1-2'.
entrance drive, revise the
shrubs to a larger -
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns)
should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible.
"proposed landscaping areas"
The low quantity of trees and the small
growing species. Show
shown on the plan submitted for
mature size of the shrubs may result in
how the tree/shrub
ARB review entitled "Proposed
limited visual impact. Because the Rt. 29
planting in this area will
Entry Layout with Landscaping
landscaping isn't included on the plan, it
coordinate with the Rt. 29
North West Passage Intersection
isn't possible to tell how this planting might
frontage planting.
@ Route 29 North" with revision
integrate with the frontage planting.
Increase the quantity of
date of 12-04-06. (Condition of
trees and shrubs as
SP-2006-34)
necessary for
coordination.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. The townhouse elevations: level of detail, reflection of the traditional architecture of the area.
2. Landscaping west of Buildings 14, 18, 21 and 24.
3. Landscaping at the stormwater facilities.
4. Landscaping along the EC frontage.
5. Interior street/pedestrian way trees.
Staff offers the following comments on the preliminary plan:
1. Revise the site plan to include a note indicating the manufacturer and color of the proposed retaining wall block. Revise the previously proposed gray block to a tan/brown color.
2. Consider somewhat darker earth tones for the Hardi-siding.
3. Revise all fence notes on the plan to have consistent wording with clear reference to the fence detail. If multiple fence types are proposed, add the relevant detail(s) and clarify all the notes.
4. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the site and architectural plans: "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
5. Correct the identification of the eastern red cedar at stormwater facility #10.
6. Revise the Sargent juniper at the retaining walls to a taller -growing shrub.
7. Limit retaining wall height at stormwater facility #11 to 6'.
8. Revise the quantity of plants at stormwater facility #11 to be consistent with the previous ARB approval.
9. Increase the quantity of shrubs on the slope on the EC side of Buildings 14, 18, 21 and 24 and revise to a taller growing species.
10. Add a mix of trees to fill the gap on the slope at Buildings 14 and 18.
11. Revise the plant schedule to show shrub planting height at 24" minimum.
12. Add the MV, UP and CJ to the plant schedule.
13. Provide landscaping along the Rt. 29 frontage to meet EC guidelines and buffer requirements.
14. Provide perimeter parking lot trees, 40' on center, at the small groups of parking spaces.
15. Add MV, UP and CJ to the plant schedule.
16. Reduce the quantity of Steeds Holly (and all shrubs) to not exceed 25% of the total shrub count.
17. For locations on the slopes north and south of the Lewis and Clark entrance drive, revise the shrubs to a larger -growing species. Show how the tree/shrub planting in this area will coordinate with the
Rt. 29 frontage planting. Increase the quantity of trees as necessary for coordination.
F.110 /:TI1:1YIDO1I:1
fF
r
• Il�ti
COUNTY OFiLHE\IU=
Department Df Comm=43 Development
402 AlcIatire Road, North li'iug
CLartc[ten 'ille, j kqp) 6g,,,Z,2; -4596
Fhi e(434)206-832 Fax (434)972-J126
April 22. 21311
VVW A=-=ociate--
CJC- c=r.F ,'. hie UJXf_
30LD>, .2 q. Plaza
Charlottesville, ]j.A22911
RE: ARB-Y011-27: North Pointe Northwest Residential Area
Tax Map 32• Parcel 22K
Dear Mr. White;
The Albemarle County ArchileDtural Review Board• slits meeting on April 1S, 2011• completed a preliminary
review of theabume-inoted requestto construct23 storylownhouses in 27blocksof 3-S units, with associated
site improvements, including roads• parldng lots• landscaping and retaining walls. The Board offered the
fallowing comments forlhe benefit of the applicant's nextsubmittal. Please note that thefoiloe'ing comments
are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments may be added or eliminated based on
further review and changes to the plan.
1. Revise The rear ele:at'Drs of blocks 14, 18. 21, and 24 to incorporate forms and features that will make
the t"viFcusesmarani=_:c-i_b_ildngs Ircadc -a'.eris ardcolorsamples.
2. Revise :-E 9:e =_E-::-a ID al- ,!, I:j J -r -e r-:I-s:-9:_-e=_ :-a =r:-re _I. re.I a E:: Jcas.
3. Elim n=t_ c -s i li-k f'c^-. •: ri,l- r _= -- c the EC F de `--rre :--:9 s r :hs --it= 1: 97 s=: fo• �e.Amv:
Ens�ra:-9: the sac'.' :: `e,ra aaicr sj is ccn a:an ::ia- e cEs _. •:tea :r_:icis; E_. _. _. Ah
ARB -.-r :h -- r-'1:.== Cgcir r, =enx may be 9ccaptatle beyenc{FH Lvith aDprcp-19:E =area-Ir3
subject t. �FE 'a. _?, ar: 9DI:'c:;sl.
4- Adc :ha =c I: Mir ro:E 7, :I -a la is sca pe Dian== -:'All site Dlanlings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to
reesn =.r-1 oe -s 7:e r=c e1 =t— hsig h::he 1nr ol-g of r- s =1: rchibited- Shrubs and trees shall be
pruneJr-r3 Di-j:c is:Dr. hoc:are.l ,Ea.I:I-:'I-eDlar:'
5- Prov J====1==a:-cr i--h= Et: - is:E:=c:l:-e pi sr at the 4.!1&2D11 meeting to clarify the visibility
of the t9 aa: 1::'1 :-Y t'1= 'E 13 -Irg =11 -r Dim - -E C.
8. Terra :='e IA -Irg Yrc Its ''_ r -E g-t =a-J :9 E r:er -50' in length. Provide planting along the terraces.
7. Fa-t:h==:: E c-:1-C sic Sin,—t:=14 -3 --3.024. Provide a m b cftrees and shrubs and revise
the g a.: irg e= 7e se,=_se, ; :c aoccm-^cdata the p 9rtr_
8- Prcv J= 3 - r-_r --E o =r: ig coxed tree one s•v-I: =oecies and sizes In compensate for removed
vegEt=.:ic i =r:l :: - rc DIEn:s to stabime slopes - :h= "proposed landscaping areas" shown an the
pier at, DI•- t1 a: f:l�'.5 r=_Jew entitled-Prnpased E-t'= Le; v_t with Landscaping North West Passage
I Mer9E of c - v.. F,c4 :E 2: a'th' with revision date of _ ._--2.'.
9. Re ;;se I -e -.=o a- F a-t vas to meet VDDT requirer.�en:s r.-He p-o%i Ji-g a continuous informal mix of
le'r=_ -a:i.m =.1Ja^-a11deciduoustrees ranging from cre9-o.-enef iuhes'1V')totwo and one half
irches f2'.a' i ca.ipmr.
You may sutmit your application for continued ARI3 review at your eerfies4 conven fence. Application forms•
checklists and schedules are available on-line at wwe'.albemade.wgiolennini7-
Fe'- -s- ,,Mrga ac J'aas rc :ha _Di---_ =:=J a:=:'aa a ac J =a r-- .a=G e.[a: .;?= rE:
ea:h J'3';: 9'_ c'1�: cr -F 3:� I a 3-9--rE 1:3-a a ---a "'.icE 3 --E-_ I-.I'-J -� :=t9
Inc lcc[r_ E3:' v111 "'Er: '_?teen acdra°Eac - If chargesctner:h9'. those, re^y jeona&: I-3','e :aer-
a:a
idcr7-', ',cse -9tgasi-:-E-E--calso.riignlighfingthechangesintheerowingwith'dci:il-j c:rL;:::-E
mes -s Mil facia late rariew anc approval.
It you have any questions concerning any of Itre above, please feel free to call me -
Sincerely,
Margaret Malisxewski
Principal Plenner
CC: NeighborhoodInvestments -NPLLC
P 0 Drawer R
Charlottesville 22903
TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date
1
Cover
12/27/16
2
Existing Conditions
12/27/16
3
Overall Plan
12/27/16
4
Layout Plan
12/27/16
5
Layout Plan
12/27/16
6
Utility Plan
12/27/16
7
Utility Plan
12/27/16
8
Grading & Drainage & Mitigation Plan
12/27/16
9
Grading & Drainage & Mitigation Plan
12/27/16
10
Landscaping Plan
12/27/16
11
Landscaping Plan & Details
12/27/16
12
Site Section Map
12/27/16
13
Site Sections
12/27/16
Al
Exterior Elevations Block 1
11/30/16
A2
Exterior Elevations Block 3 (Blocks 4, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21 & 24 sim)
11/30/16
A3
Exterior Elevations Block 26 (Blocks 17, 20, 22, 23 & 25 sim)
11/30/16
A4
Exterior Elevations Block 10
11/30/16
A5
Exterior Elevations Block 12
11/30/16
A6
I Exterior Elevations Block 2
11/30/16
A7
Exterior Elevations Block 27
11/30/16
-
Photos of site as viewed from Entrance Corridor
-
-
Photos of proposed retaining wall material
-
-
Photos of proposed building materials: front door finish (Light Oak), shingles (Timberline charcoal), Hardie -
lank (Navajo Beige, Cobblestone, Heathered Moss, Sail Cloth, Pearl Gray)
10