HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201600161 Staff Report 2017-01-30ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB-2016-126: Flow Auto Audi Showroom
Review Type
Second review of a Site Plan Amendment and an architectural design
Parcel Identification
078000000015D0, 078000000015EO
Location
1313 Richmond Road, on the south side of Rt. 250, approximately 700' east of People Place
Zoned
Highway Commercial (HC)/Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
Janice S. Linkous/BRW Architects (Kurt Keesecker)
Magisterial District
Rivanna
Proposal
To construct a new automobile showroom with associated site improvements.
Context
The site of the proposed building is the vehicle display lot located west of the current Flow auto dealership building. Automobile dealerships predominate along this
stretch of Rt. 250. Banks and restaurants are also located nearby.
Visibility
The new showroom will be clearly visible from the Entrance Corridor.
ARB Meeting Date
February 6, 2017
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
PROJECT HISTORY
DATE
APPLICATION
RESULT
11/7/2016
ARB-2016-126
The ARB completed a preliminary review of this proposal. The action letter from this meeting is included as Attachment A to this report. The comments made at
the meeting are also included in the Analysis table.
12/5/2016
ARB-2016-126
The ARB held a work session on the architectural design of the showroom building. The action letter from this meeting is included as Attachment B to this report.
The comments made at the meeting are also included in the Analysis table.
12/19/2016
ARB-2016-126
The ARB voted to approve the massing, size and location of the Audi showroom, but noted that all other issues must be addressed in a formal submittal for review.
ANALYSIS
REF
GUIDELINE
PREVIOUS ARB
CURRENT ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
COMMENT
Structure design
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the designated
1.Revise the building design —
The general form, mass and size of the
Provide elevations at 1/8"
Entrance Corridors is to insure that new development within the corridors reflects
forms, features, materials,
building were approved by the ARB at the
scale. Identify all
the traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the purpose of ARB review
details - to reflect the traditional
12/19/2016 meeting. The applicant has
materials and colors on
and of these Guidelines, that proposed development within the designated
architecture of the area.
replaced the metal with glass storefront
the elevations. Provide a
Entrance Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the significant
and brick. Mottled brick replaces the
brick sample for review.
historical landmarks, buildings, and structures of the Charlottesville and
WS 1.The design option
previously proposed white brick. Brick
Albemarle area, and to promote orderly and attractive development within these
presented at the meeting (not
has a much stronger tie to the historic
corridors. Applicants should note that replication of historic structures is neither
included in the emailed
architecture of the County than the
required nor desired.
information) was preferred over
the others. This design
previously proposed metal. The brick
helps establish more of a balance between
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area
experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order to
eliminated the metal from the
historic architecture and the contemporary
accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and vegetation characteristic of
exterior elevations.
buildings on the Rt. 250 corridor. It also
these sites, the Guidelines require attention to four primary factors: compatibility
provides more texture and scale. A brick
with significant historic sites in the area; the character of the Entrance Corridor;
WS2.A mottled brick (multiple
sample is needed for review. The
site development and layout; and landscaping.
colors of brick) is preferred to
all white brick. Detailing of the
elevations should clearly identify the
proposed materials and colors. The
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the
traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings in the
brick (a brick cap, the design of
elevation drawings are difficult to read at
Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the area,
the coursing or joints, etc.)
the size provided.
as well as drawings of architectural features, which provide important examples
might also be pursued to relieve
of this tradition are contained in Appendix A.
the stark white appearance.
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building
design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic structures is not
intended to impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of
the design of the important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor
desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building
scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is
contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design
to accommodate varying tastes as well as special functional requirements.
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors
and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the significant
historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the buildings
described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility
can be met through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in
architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of
important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these
guidelines.
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of
compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in order
to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate sensitivity
to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated
corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful
balance between harmonizing new development with the existing character of the
corridor and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area.
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be integral
to the building and site design.
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes,
scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be relieved
None.
Blankness is not a characteristic of the
None.
using design detail or vegetation, or both.
proposed design.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be used to
See recommendation under #1.
The form and size of the building are
None.
unify groups of buildings within a development.
consistent with other buildings in place on
the corridor.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the
See recommendation under #1.
See comments under #1.
See recommendations
requirements of the Guidelines.
under #1.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly
2.Add the standard window
The note appears on Sheet 5 of the
None.
reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following
glass note to the architectural
architectural drawing set.
criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 4001o. Visible light
elevations.
reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30% Specifications on the proposed window
glass should be submitted with the application for final review.
Accessory structures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall plan of
3.Provide additional details to
The applicant states that landscaping
Provide a guard rail
development and shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with the building
clarify the appearance of the
along the EC, the brick wall along the
detail, including material
designs used on the site.
site elements and landscaping
in and around the vehicle
front of the display area, the landscape
areas and grass plaza/sitting area, and the
and color identification,
in the site plan.
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor
street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a negative visual
display area and the entrances
pervious pavers that match the color of
impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to eliminate
to the showroom. Show how a
the showroom floor provide for a
Provide plants at the base
visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas, d. Storage areas,
coordinated appearance will be
coordinated appearance and reflect
of the 10' wall.
e. Mechanical equipment, f. Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence,
achieved and how these
historic architecture.
barbed wire, razor wire, and similar security fencing devices.
features reflect historic
architecture of the area.
The consistent use of materials for
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and
surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c.
building walls and site walls provides a
Fencing.
coordinated appearance for the
development. The use of brick is a tie to
the historic architecture of the area.
Decorative guard rails are shown on top
of the site wall that parallels the EC. The
images suggest a much more appropriate
appearance than standard guard rail, but a
detail is needed in the site plan.
Trees and shrubs are shown at the base of
the site walls on the EC and west sides,
and shrubs are proposed in the planters at
the west end of the display area and east
of the showroom. However, there are no
shrubs at the base of the eastern wall,
which reaches 10' tall.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan:
4.Add the standard mechanical
The note appears on Sheet 5 of the
None.
"Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be
equipment note to the site and
architectural drawing set and Sheet 3 of
eliminated."
architectural plans.
the site plan.
Lighting
22
Light should be contained on the site and not spill over onto adjacent properties or
5.Revise the layout of the
The sheet layout was rearranged to make
None.
streets;
lighting sheet to make all areas
the full frontage visible. Spillover does
of both parcels completely
not exceed .5 fc.
visible.
23
Light should be shielded, recessed or flush -mounted to eliminate glare. All
None.
None.
None.
fixtures with lamps emitting 3000 lumens or more must be full cutoff fixtures.
24
Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate for display lots in the
6.Revise the lighting plan to
The maximum light level on the revised
None.
Entrance Corridors. Lower light levels will apply to most other uses in the
make all fc readings legible.
lighting plan is 18.7 fc.
Entrance Corridors.
Outside of display areas, limit
illumination to 20 fc maximum.
25
Light should have the appearance of white light with a warm soft glow; however,
None.
The revised plan shows that existing pole
None.
a consistent appearance throughout a site or development is required.
lights on the eastern part of the parcel are
Consequently, if existing lamps that emit non -white light are to remain, new
to remain without change.
lamps may be required to match them.
26
Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors for free-standing pole
None.
None.
None.
mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors.
27
The height and scale of freestanding, pole -mounted light fixtures should be
None.
None.
None.
compatible with the height and scale of the buildings and the sites they are
illuminating, and with the use of the site. Typically, the height of freestanding
pole -mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors should not exceed 20 feet,
including the base. Fixtures that exceed 20 feet in height will typically require
additional screening to achieve an appropriate appearance from the Entrance
Corridor.
28
In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance Corridors,
7.Coordinate all sheets of the
The revised landscape plan eliminates the
None.
the individual context of the site will be taken into consideration on a case by case
site plan set regarding proposed
three fixtures from the west side of the
basis.
lighting, particularly the C
building and the W fixture from the
fixtures shown on the landscape
schedule.
plan and the W fixtures in the
luminaire schedule.
29
The following note should be included on the lighting plan: "Each outdoor
None.
None.
None.
luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a
full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from
adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of
lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural
areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half footcandle."
Landscaping
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended to reflect
8.Clarify and coordinate the
Revised notes clarify most of the existing-
Revise the plan to
the landscaping characteristic of many of the area's significant historic sites
notes on the drawings and
to -remain and existing -to -be -removed
coordinate the project
which is characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping should
throughout the submittal
plants. However, the demolition plan
limits line and the island
promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor and help to integrate buildings
regarding the retention of
shows a "project limits" line that bisects a
with trees located
into the existing environment of the corridor.
existing landscaping.
planting island (with trees) identified for
removal. Part of the island and one of the
southeast of the proposed
building.
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different
types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such common elements
9.Add one ornamental tree in
trees are located on the adjacent parcel
allow for more flexibility in the design of structures because common landscape
the gap along the EC frontage.
(78-15D).
features will help to harmonize the appearance of development as seen from the
street upon which the Corridor is centered.
1 O.Revise the landscape plan to
eliminate plants that are no
The revised plan shows an Autumn
Brilliance Serviceberry added along the
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the
following:
longer proposed.
EC frontage.
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor Street.
Such trees should be at least 3%2 inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the
11.Revise the plan to clarify the
Some plants on parcel 15 still overlap, but
ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should
plants shown on parcel 15.
all are shown as existing to remain.
be located at least every 35 feet on center.
Eliminate overlapping plant
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be
symbols.
interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental
trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted
among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern.
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall,
typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street.
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and
fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive
of road right-of-way and utility easements.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
14.Clarify the appearance and
A planter is located at the front of the site,
Provide plants at the base
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees should be
planting proposed for the
just west of the vehicle display area. It
of the 10' wall.
at least 2'/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be
planters at the front and east
includes eight dwarf sweetspire and ten
of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every
side of the site.
dwarf inkberry holly. This planter wall is
Increase the size of the IG
40 feet on center.
12.Add one perimeter parking
shown as a continuation of the front
retaining wall. The planter east of the
at the front site wall to
24" high minimum at
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian ways. Such
lot tree along the southern
showroom holds 31 dwarf sweetspire.
planting.
trees should be at least 2'/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground)
parking row.
and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be located at
A note on the plan states that the front
Continue the shrubs
least every 25 feet on center.
WS3.Maintain the planting area
between the front parking area
site wall will be brick to match the
building. For clarity, similar notes should
around the northwest
corner of the display area.
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet on
and the western retaining wall.
be added at both planters.
center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of one
tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed
The plan shows one serviceberry added at
throughout the interior of the parking area.
the east end of the southern parking lot
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2'/2 inches caliper
perimeter. This is not a large tree, but the
(measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be
available space is limited due to the
of a species common to the area. Such trees should be planted in planters or
location of existing trees and shrubs.
medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected
by curbing.
The planter west of the front parking area
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact
remains.
on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height.
There are no shrubs at the base of the
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long buildings as
eastern wall, which reaches 10' tall.
necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type
of such trees or vegetation should be determined by the length, height, and
The planting height of the inkberry holly
blankness of such walls.
along the EC frontage is listed as 18". 24"
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures;
is a typical minimum for this location.
dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service
Note that the ground level where the
areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height.
shrubs will be planted is lower than the
level of the parked cars.
There is a jog in the retaining wall at the
northwest corner of the display area.
Extending the shrubs into this area would
help integrate the wall into the landscape.
37
Plant species:
13.If any of the Carissa holly or
No additional Carissa holly or American
None.
a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff based upon but not
American boxwood will be
boxwood have been added.
limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and Native
replaced, it is recommended
Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D).
that alternate species be used to
support a healthy landscape.
The goal is to limit the number
of proposed plants for any one
species to 25% of the total
proposed for that plant type.
38
Plant health:
None.
None.
None.
The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All site plantings of
trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height;
the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and
only to support the overall health of theplant."
Development pattern
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and should
3.Provide additional details to
See comments under #17-18, above.
See recommendations
contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This may be
clarify the appearance of the
under #17-18, above.
accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling terrain
site elements and landscaping
typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and pedestrian ways and
in and around the vehicle
choosing species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that any grading will
display area and the entrances
blend into the surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape;
to the showroom. Show how a
preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys
coordinated appearance will be
which may be located on the site and integrating these features into the design of
achieved and how these
surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale
features reflect historic
that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor.
architecture of the area.
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor street
and to other development within the corridor should be as follows:
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian walks
should guide the layout of the site.
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be parallel to
the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the Entrance
Corridor street.
c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular
circulation systems.
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within
the Entrance Corridor.
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep
slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such
natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section
32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements
required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing
features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets.
f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas
on and around the site.
Site Grading
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding
14.Clarify the appearance and
A note on the plan indicates that the
Provide top of wall and
conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through
planting proposed for the walls,
eastern site wall reaches 10' tall. Wall
bottom of wall elevations
the use of smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut
paving and planters at the front
heights are not provided for the other
for the site walls.
or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan
and east side of the site.
walls.
shall be rounded with a ten -foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent
Provide plants at the base
condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than engineered,
WS4.Use landscaping at the
Typically, site walls of any significant
of the 10' wall.
appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when necessary, shall be
base of the retaining wall to
height are treated with landscaping at the
terraced and planted to blend with the landscape.
soften the edge.
base, but no planting area is provided at
the base of the 10' wall.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any trees or
8.Clarify and coordinate the
These notes have been corrected.
None.
other existing features designated for preservation in the final Certificate of
notes on the drawings and
Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and
throughout the submittal
coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment control
regarding the retention of
plans.
existing landscaping.
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness
should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity
on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion of the
development of the site.
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy
equipment within this area.
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into the
None at this time.
None.
None.
natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from the Entrance
Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the landscape. They
should not have the appearance of engineered features.
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should
be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. The degree to which the proposal reflects the traditional architecture of the area
2. The revised building materials
3. Plants at the base of the site walls/the frontage planting
4. The planters at the display area
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions:
1. Provide elevations at 1/8" scale. Identify all materials and colors on the elevations.
2. Provide a brick sample for review.
3. Provide a guard rail detail, including material and color identification, in the site plan.
4. Revise the plan to coordinate the project limits line and the island with trees located southeast of the proposed building.
5. Increase the size of the IG at the front site wall to 24" high minimum at planting.
6. Continue the shrubs around the northwest corner of the display area.
7. Provide top of wall and bottom of wall elevations for the site walls.
8. Provide plants at the base of the 10' wall.
TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date
1
Cover
10/6/16
2
Existing Conditions
10/6/16
3
Site Plan & Utilities
10/6/16
4
Grading & SWM Plan
10/6/16
5
Landscape Plan
10/6/16
6
Lighting Plan
10/6/16
7
Display Parking Calculations
10/6/16
-
Architectural package
9/26/2016
-
Materials: Metal cladding: Sabotec diamond perforated aluminum mesh; curtain wall framing: Kawneer 162-003, anodized aluminum; glass: PPG Solarban 60; building base:
Rieder concrete slat wall panels, oko skin in "Silvergrey" (mix of MA and FL); brick: Glen-Gery in "Aspen white" W804; display area paving: Ariostea TeknoStone in
"Tobacco"
-
F.11 0 KTIN I, MY I D1121 W
0
COUN1Y OF.ILLBEIL-IRLE
Department of Community DeVClOPMCHt
401 AIrIntire Road. NorrIj Wing.
Charlotm-rille,'Viijinia 22902-4696
Pkum=_ (434) 296-Z&32 Fax
Nou,Enber 11. 2016
Kurt Kenealer. AIA
112 4ffi St NE
Ckarlotte -ille VA 22902
RE: A"201600 IN Flow Axiomoth eAudi SIIDIVMOM
Dear h1r.KeeEejcer,
972-4126
7bellbemarle CcuntS : sc'siteah=' K=.ie-cc B=d, at its meetiu= otiNmember 7. 201=,completed a
leviEw to MILMUCt 3 Uell: ZU-=Ll}'711- as9ociated Eite
TIE 3, �:. ±-2 f-11DI -ME Comments for the -ELI eL C: the applicants next
P _al= =e ---at di- we thmatliatbmbemilent _"im:at -Ins time. Additionalconinients
way r e added x -.xffier re,.-leiv and changes to the plan.
1. Revise tle ' uildinE deeim - fmms. features, materials. details -to reflect the traditional
architecture , I the area -
Add -_', e 3ta3:caJ ninco%v sia.nE note to the arzhitectura! e!e-aticms. Ti rJrVe ?fg-hg f+anzmijyanze
7'r 7.
ZCJM�'131 N-tZLIL to _-.Irl IP'.— 371nCe -f th - airs -2.etURn:: 211-' :Maa ca.. 63 in and
th R ar-1 a -,I:. --,L- -2niru-_eztD uL- L.:c,:.7com. "S -n- avw F : xYdaizted
a i I I oe a e as m c� _-c - _ewe Z2atxires ie7he- ilB.tGliC arc'suteffture of the area
4. _% :.-- -- ta::.aj c. - __-.L.p:nent Dotem tD the site and architemcha-al plans Visibility of all
MEC F L) 1 115 ent '=i R Emtranze: CorndDr ffiall be elimmated_'
5- Fe ire 7___ .i7 - I i -_'_itm -_ zlieet tD make all areas ufboffi paz is completely visible-
6. Revise t[n L:.nI p.m -.c. =21A all fc Teadines legiblem. Ckitzide of display areas, limit iUmmmation
to 20 fe
7- Coordinate sneers of the site plan set ieEwding proposed lighting, particulaik- ffie C fmtureq
ehomivn on the Ian-: :a_ 2 plan and --, - vm x%.res in the lummaire Ech-dulr=.
S. CL-arit- and COOT&D 1: R 11= :-_'-es on Z''. 193.3nd thFC1UFhGUt the SUblni-31 raEarditiE the
mtentiCm ofe:Ki�lai= 'aliLcqi, -.
9. Add one _=wneunJ :-c- in t.,L- ray F nz --- e EC ffuntaiae.
10. Rel LEE tA- '.),In = -[L1n:nFt- ').ZZM the are 12D longer proposed.
1. 1-i L-mm tin -_a1i 7c 2'=. thm v 13`it- choxim Dn par-21 lf. --UnliDate omcerlappinE plant 23_Mb015_
CJ CK -2 V k-t tine 31DILF tbLE saAlki.M =IanE row.
13- HwK oftlie CBELL: I Aa..., C1 A =cmxxweod %vill -- :eplaced: it is 7e_-D-rwieiJed thFt alter -:ate
species be used to =v D-1 3 31-- ., =: 1-3. aa =_-a 1 -c linaitthe n=L-- fp-,-Pc -1zi
for MV One SPRM+�L to __; ', c : --,L- :eta_ p-,-, L- z --'or that Plant tPE.
14. Clarit-the appearance a p.:_ntmf -Dr -±e,.-.-3iL: paring and planters at the fi,=1 and
east side of the site.
1J. ClaTit- and coordinate the notes on the draivimpamd throughout the submittal regarding the
retention of existing landscaping.
You may submit y*tir application for continued _kU review at 3 clur earliest zotivetneme. Application f=s,
cbeckli_ts and schedules we available an -line at iroiwv_arben rle_org_kRB.
Rei-msed draivinZ2 ad&esEmE the comments listed above are required. Include updated Sits revnion d=s an
each drawing_ Please PFOVL a MEMO including detailed F23Pons2n indicating bmv each con3lueat has ben
addressed_ If changes other than those requested halms been made. identify those changes in the memo also_
Highlighting the changes in the draiving with "clouding' Dr by offim tneZnS Will fiLCiIi=B M-IEM' and ZPPFcr,-.aL
EFycu halm my questivns concerning m3 ofthe albo ,e, please feel fire W call
Sincerely,
Margaret hfalismw-Ja
Principal Planner
Link , Jaruca S
2205 ShEphzx1s. Ridge PA
Chzrlottenal[le VA 22,901
File
10
Ell 0 KTIN I, My I DWI 8 1.1
0
COUNTY OF ALREVLARLE
Dep eRk Of CG3MMUDity DEVe[OPMEMi
401 Xlclxfire Road, North ll-img
CharlotteswiHe,lirginia 22902-459+
PkDxe (434) 296-583.' Fax (434) 9'r--4126
December 9, 2016
Kitt Kemerber, ALA
RRWArchitectz
112 4th St NE
Chorlodemlle VA22902
RE: ARB201600126 FhywXutonwtke Audi Sko% roi)m
Dear M. KeeseLker,
The Xlbe=b! C Du:t,, Ay- i-. - z7 -L:a- F-27' EV'l O:J j. 1. Lt2 meeting on December 5, 20 A: held Ek mxIc 3E99im Dn the
above -noted Item. Tli- -�LT-B AL- ti- = =amcnt!'
I_ The de&[E:L qjd,,r =ElemtEd at be mcRcls 'mo: in-ALdeE in tLE Emji[LEd EnhimaiDl* waE preferred over the
OtLKI. 71': �.i: '7'1 �e meta] -' -.n Iz EV-2. i: L!Em ' I A mo:::z : ni j'--az: L.- -bdc k -m -f:z. 1- 1 A m� n::z :Lk. DR-.20itis,. ofthE brick {i biiLk cap,
the z"-, -d� .—-, o- -c-u-'-- :i 7o --m .7L:': appearmre.
MaiwFLud-E-)ELiLig r2E:.LaT.L2,xE'-.eLI :27aiLinTxalL
4- Use lamdmapling at Cite base Gfliie retaining wall w soften the edge.
You niff.v mibmit ymr apphczftm fcT conbmied ARE Feviewat yow exr1jest nomEmence- Appbcaaon Eam%
cheEklistE and w-herhAEL are available an-lme at vmn.albeniarla.GFglARB.
Revised drawings addressing the coa=etus listed above, and tL*a-- from prR-do3-, Le--euA). are ie.uae2. Include
updated AM revision dates on each drawing. PLESSE provide a ME=c :!-: 1. j in -- &t2 �:::m im .1011;
each comment has been addressed. Ifcll-- -a zllJ acs in
the XMD also. Eighliglinng the dumm in the dram -mg uith:'clmditig'- or by other mums iiiU M-Ciiaze reiiew and
appi-al
IfyDu have atrvquestiotm wnce=2 mv of the ibave, plEasE feel Free to call me.
SMOPFEh',
Margmt malismilAi
Principal Planner
cc: Liukms, lamke S
2,205 ShepbEr& RWEa Rd
Chzrlodwso VA22901
File
11