HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201600011 Review Comments 2016-04-22Short Review Comments Report for:
SDP201600011
SubApplication Type:
The Vue - Initial
Initial Site Plan
Date Completed:04/05/2016
Reviewer:Rachel Falkenstein CDD Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:02/29/2016
Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer CDD Inspections
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated February 21, 2016.
Rearrange all of the barrier-free parking spaces so that they are van-accessible. And, provide
van-accessible, barrier-free parking spaces, with their associated striped access aisles and curb cuts
at the entrances to Buildings 100, 300, 700 and 800.
Division:
Date Completed:03/01/2016
Reviewer:Andrew Slack CDD E911
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:The applicant will require at least 2 road names before final approval is given. The developer should
contact this office with a list of three (3) road name suggestions for each road. Please let me know if
there are any questions.
Division:
Date Completed:04/04/2016
Reviewer:Matthew Wentland CDD Engineering
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:03/10/2016
Reviewer:Unassigned VDOT
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:04/06/2016
Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:1. Fire flow test required before final approval.
2. Please add a note to the plans “Knox boxes required on all buildings, please contact Albemarle
County Fire Marshal Office for locations”
3. Fire Hydrant spacing shall be 500’ per travel way.
4. FDC locations shall be on the address side of the structure and within 100’ of a fire hydrant.
5. Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a
building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road
shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of
the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an
approved route around the exterior of the building or facility.
Exception: The fire code official is authorized to increase the dimension of 150 feet where:
1. The building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in
accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3.
Albemarle County will increase the distance to 200’ where an approved sprinkler system has been
installed.
6. The required turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be determined by the fire code
official. Albemarle County will accept 25’ or greater.
7. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet,
approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For purposes of this section, the
highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the
intersection of the roof to the exterior wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is greater. Aerial fire
apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders,
in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof.
At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of
15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side
of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned
shall be approved by the fire code official.
8. Multiple-family residential projects having more than 100 dwelling units shall be equipped
throughout with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Exception: Projects having
up to 200 dwelling units may have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all buildings,
including nonresidential occupancies, are equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler
systems installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2.
Division:
Page:1 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On:February 07, 2017
1. The building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in
accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3.
Albemarle County will increase the distance to 200’ where an approved sprinkler system has been
installed.
6. The required turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be determined by the fire code
official. Albemarle County will accept 25’ or greater.
7. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet,
approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For purposes of this section, the
highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the
intersection of the roof to the exterior wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is greater. Aerial fire
apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders,
in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof.
At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of
15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side
of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned
shall be approved by the fire code official.
8. Multiple-family residential projects having more than 100 dwelling units shall be equipped
throughout with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Exception: Projects having
up to 200 dwelling units may have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all buildings,
including nonresidential occupancies, are equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler
systems installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2.
Date Completed:04/06/2016
Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:04/22/2016
Reviewer:Victoria Fort RWSA
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Page:2 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On:February 07, 2017
'AL
IH[;Stit
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Phone 434-296-5832
Memorandum
To: William Park (wpark@pinnacleconstructionva.com)
From: Rachel Falkenstein, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: April 5, 2016
Updated April 22, 2016
Subject: SDP 2016-11 The Vue — Initial Site Development Plan
Fax 434-972-4126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further
review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning
Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
1. [32.5.2(a)] Amend title to state that this is an initial site plan, not preliminary site plan.
2. [32.5.2(a)] Include Flood Hazard Overlay (FH), Preserved Steep Slopes in zoning designation.
3. [32.5.2(a)] Include ownership info and tax map and parcel info for TMP 56-6A on cover sheet since
this parcel is part of the proposed development.
4. [32.5.2(a)] Label any departing lot lines.
5. [32.5.2(a)] Setbacks shown and noted on the plan are incorrect. The applicable setbacks for this site
can be found in section 4.19. Amend setback lines and notes on the plan to match R-6 non -infill
setback requirements listed in this section.
The maximum front setback of 25 feet in the R-6 zoning applies to both the Blue Ridge Avenue
frontage AND the Jarman's Gap Road frontage. While the "multiple buildings on one lot" provision
can be used to allow other buildings to be set back further, there must be at least one building on
each of the two road frontages at or within the 25 foot maximum. This could be accomplished with
a "corner" single building not more than 25' from both Jarman's Gap Road and Blue Ridge Avenue. In
the case where utility easements extend beyond the 25' maximum setback along Jarmin's Gap the
new setback shall become the outermost edge of the utility easement.
The building locations shown will require a special exception from the maximum front setback
requirement or can be moved closer to the right-of-way as described above to comply with setback
maximums.
6. [32.5.2(a)] More clearly identify existing landscape features. Identify existing wooded areas and
trees as described in section 32.7.9.4(c).
Page 3 of 16
7. [32.5.2(b)] The area to be dedicated for the public roadway/stream crossing serving the West Glen
development should be subtracted from the acreage of this property. Amend site acreage, open
space area and density calculations accordingly.
8. [32.5.2(b)] Provide more detail about building height measurements showing where building heights
are measured from (front, side, etc.).
9. [32.5.2(b)] Provide square footage of recreational areas (club house and pool).
10. [32.5.2(c)] Is phasing proposed for this development? If so, show phase lines on site plan.
11. [32.5.2(d)] Label areas of site with steep slopes. Consult County GIS for slope locations and slope
types.
12. [32.5.2(f)] Show WPO stream buffer along Powell's Creek. Consult County GIS for location of stream
buffer.
13. [32.5.2(i)] Provide width of existing and proposed Blue Ridge Ave pavement and right-of-way.
14. [32.5.2(i)] Label Jeremiah Lane as private and provide clearer labeling. It appears the right-of-way
turns and crosses onto tax map 56-115, but is unclear.
15. [32.5.2(f) & 17-602(b)(1)] To the extent practical, as determined by the Albemarle County Service
Authority or the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority, the location of the water or sewer lines shall
be outside of all stream buffer areas. Attempt to remove sanitary sewer lines and connections to
areas outside of the stream buffer.
16. [32.5.2(i)] Label radii and pavement widths in parking lot access aisles.
17. [32.5.2(j)] Show and label widths for all existing utility easements; existing utilities overall should be
more clearly labeled. Show connections to existing utilities in closer detail. Verify that all necessary
utility easements and facilities have been shown on the plan.
18. [32.5.2(n)] Provide dimensions and footprint of proposed buildings (typical is ok for buildings of
same dimensions).
19. [32.5.2(n)] Provide dimensions and pavement materials of walkways adjacent to proposed buildings.
20. [32.5.2(n)] Show locations and heights of any outdoor lighting fixtures. A detailed lighting plan will
be required with final site plan.
21. [32.5.2(n)] Provide more details about proposed recreational facilities on site, including what uses
are proposed within the Clubhouse.
22. [32.5.2(n)] The Crozet Master Plan shows a greenway along Powell's Creek, along the west side of
the creek. Staff provided comments to the developers of West Glen asking for this greenway area to
be dedicated to public use as part of their special use permit request. Please coordinate with West
Glen developers to work out area of dedication and the alignment of the greenway trail. Show trail
location and area of greenway dedication on the site plan.
Page 4 of 16
23. [32.5.2(n) & 4.16] Residential developments must comply with section 4.16 for minimum
recreational facilities. A development of this size would require, at minimum, two tot lots and a half
court for basketball. If substitutions of equivalent facilities are proposed, please provide a request
for the substitution to include which facilities you will be providing and a justification for the
request.
24. [32.5.2(n)] Provide retaining wall details on final site plan. Safety provisions may be needed and
design should comply with Albemarle County Design Standards Manual.
25. [32.5.2(p)] Provide a landscape plan that complies with section 32.7.9 of the Zoning Ordinance with
the final site plan. Landscape plan should provide details to show that screening requirements,
parking area landscaping requirements, and tree canopy requirements are met.
26. [32.5.2(p)] Label height of retaining walls on landscape plan sheets and provide enough detail to
ensure screening is provided in accordance with section 32.7.9.7.
27. [32.7.2.3] Provide pedestrian connections to the site from sidewalk on Blue Ridge Avenue.
28. [32.7.9.7(d)] Street trees should be planted within the right-of-way and located between the
sidewalk and curb, if possible.
29. [Comment] The house and outbuildings at 1194 Blue Ridge Avenue are contributing structures in the
Crozet National Register Historic District. If the buildings won't be retained in the new development
and demolition is proposed, note that an approved demolition permit will be required prior to
demolition. It is Historic Preservation Committee policy to document structures prior to demolition.
Please allow time for this process. Alternatively, the applicant can provide the documentation. For
additional information contact Margaret Maliszewski at mmaliszewski@albemarle.org or 434-296-
5832 x3276.
Recommended Changes for Your Consideration
The proposed apartments are a by -right use within the R-6 Zoning designation. The use and density proposed
are permissible within R-6. If you meet the County's new front setback requirements and make necessary
changes to address reviewers' comments contained within this letter, staff can grant administrative approval
of this project.
Please be advised that the comments below are recommendations on how the site could be altered to address
concerns of walkability, scale and terrain. They are recommendations only, and not requirements of approval
for this site plan. However, we would be glad to work with you on these changes should you wish to make
them.
From the standpoint of creating a more pedestrian -friendly design and one that works better with terrain, staff
would like to make you aware of our concerns with the tall retaining wall proposed along Blue Ridge Avenue.
With 2 -story buildings above that retaining wall, the design may be overwhelming to the pedestrian. We would
recommend that you consider the following:
1. Consider grading changes to minimize use of walls over 6' tall.
Page 5 of 16
2. Consider minimizing the creation of 2:1 slopes and opt for 3:1 slopes and 4:1 slopes which are
easier to walk on, easier to establish and maintain with vegetation, and easier to accommodate
steps.
Consider providing a pedestrian connection from the west side of the site to the proposed
greenway trail along Powell's Creek. This would help residents of the development more easily
access the County's trail system.
Please contact Rachel Falkenstein in the Planning Division by using rfalkenstein@olbemarle.org or 434-296-
5832 ext. 3272 for further information.
Page 6 of 16
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
April 5, 2016
William Park
1215 East Market Street
Suite200
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: SDP2016-11 The Vue — Initial Site Development Plan
Dear Mr. Park:
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Initial comments
for the following divisions of the Department of Community Development and other agencies, as
applicable, are attached:
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner)
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer)
Albemarle County Information Services (E911)
Albemarle County Building Inspections
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue (to be forwarded upon receipt)
Albemarle County Service Authority (to be forwarded upon receipt)
Rivanna Sewer and Water Authority (to be forwarded upon receipt)
Virginia Department of Transportation
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should
not be considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues that
will be required to be resolved prior to Final Site Plan approval. The Lead Reviewer will either approve
with conditions or deny the Initial Site Plan within 15 days of the Site Review Meeting.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
0 p4m�
Rachel Falkenstein
Senior Planner
Planning Services
'AL
IH[;Stit
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Phone 434-296-5832
Memorandum
To: William Park (wpark@pinnacleconstructionva.com)
From: Rachel Falkenstein, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: April 5, 2016
Subject: SDP 2016-11 The Vue — Initial Site Development Plan
Fax 434-972-4126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend approval of the plan referenced above once the
following comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based on further
review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning
Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
1. [32.5.2(a)] Amend title to state that this is an initial site plan, not preliminary site plan.
2. [32.5.2(a)] Include Flood Hazard Overlay (FH), Preserved Steep Slopes in zoning designation.
3. [32.5.2(a)] Include ownership info and tax map and parcel info for TMP 56-6A on cover sheet since
this parcel is part of the proposed development.
4. [32.5.2(a)] Label any departing lot lines.
5. [32.5.2(a)] Setbacks shown and noted on the plan are incorrect. The applicable setbacks for this site
can be found in section 4.19. Amend setback lines and notes on the plan to match R-6 non -infill
setback requirements listed in this section.
The maximum front setback from Blue Ridge Ave and Jarmins Gap is 25 feet. The building locations
shown will require a special exception from the maximum front setback requirement or can be
moved closer to the street to comply with setbacks.
6. [32.5.2(a)] More clearly identify existing landscape features. Identify existing wooded areas and
trees as described in section 32.7.9.4(c).
7. [32.5.2(b)] The area to be dedicated for the public roadway/stream crossing serving the West Glen
development should be subtracted from the acreage of this property. Amend site acreage, open
space area and density calculations accordingly.
8. [32.5.2(b)] Provide more detail about building height measurements showing where building heights
are measured from. Include side elevations of buildings fronting on Blue Ridge Avenue.
9. [32.5.2(b)] Provide square footage of recreational areas (club house and pool).
10. [32.5.2(c)] Is phasing proposed for this development? If so, show phase lines on site plan.
11. [32.5.2(d)] Label areas of site with steep slopes. Consult County GIS for slope locations and slope
types.
12. [32.5.2(f)] Show WPO stream buffer along Powell's Creek. Consult County GIS for location of stream
buffer.
13. [32.5.2(1)] Provide width of existing and proposed Blue Ridge Ave pavement and right-of-way.
14. [32.5.2(1)] Label Jeremiah Lane as private and provide clearer labeling. It appears the right of way
turns and crosses onto tax map 56-115, but is unclear.
15. [32.5.2(f) & 17-602(b)(1)] To the extent practical, as determined by the Albemarle County Service
Authority or the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority, the location of the water or sewer lines shall
be outside of all stream buffer areas. Attempt to remove sanitary sewer lines and connections to
areas outside of the stream buffer.
16. [32.5.2(i)] Label radii and pavement widths in parking lot access aisles.
17. [32.5.2(j)] Show and label widths for all existing utility easements; existing utilities overall should be
more clearly labeled. Show connections to existing utilities in closer detail. Verify that all necessary
utility easements and facilities have been shown on the plan.
18. [32.5.2(n)] Provide dimensions and footprint of proposed buildings (typical is ok for buildings of
same dimensions).
19. [32.5.2(n)] Provide dimensions and pavement materials of walkways adjacent to proposed buildings.
20. [32.5.2(n)] Show locations and heights of any outdoor lighting fixtures. A detailed lighting plan will
be required with final site plan.
21. [32.5.2(n)] Provide more details about proposed recreational facilities on site, including what uses
are proposed within the Clubhouse.
22. [32.5.2(n)] The Crozet Master Plan shows a greenway along Powell's Creek, along the west side of
the creek. Staff provided comments to the developers of West Glen asking for this greenway area to
be dedicated to public use as part of their special use permit request. Please coordinate with West
Glen developers to work out area of dedication and the alignment of the greenway trail. Show trail
location and area of greenway dedication on the site plan.
23. [32.5.2(n) & 4.16] Residential developments must comply with section 4.16 for minimum
recreational facilities. A development of this size would require, at minimum, two tot lots and a half
court for basketball. If substitutions of equivalent facilities are proposed, please provide a request
for the substitution to include which facilities you will be providing and a justification for the
request.
24. [32.5.2(n)] Provide retaining wall details on final site plan. Safety provisions may be needed and
design should comply with Albemarle County Design Standards Manual.
25. [32.5.2(p)] Provide a landscape plan that complies with section 32.7.9 of the Zoning Ordinance with
the final site plan. Landscape plan should provide details to show that screening requirements,
parking area landscaping requirements, and tree canopy requirements are met.
26. [32.5.2(p)] Label height of retaining walls on landscape plan sheets and provide enough detail to
ensure screening is provided in accordance with section 32.7.9.7.
27. [32.7.2.3] Provide pedestrian connections to the site from sidewalk on Blue Ridge Avenue.
28. [32.7.9.7(d)] Street trees should be planted within the right-of-way and located between the
sidewalk and curb, if possible.
Recommended Changes for Your Consideration
The proposed apartments are a by -right use within the R-6 Zoning designation. The use and density proposed
are permissible within R-6. If you meet the County's new front setback requirements and make necessary
changes to address reviewers' comments contained within this letter, staff can grant administrative approval
of this project.
Please be advised that the comments below are recommendations on how the site could be altered to address
concerns of walkability, scale and terrain. They are recommendations only, and not requirements of approval
for this site plan. However, we would be glad to work with you on these changes should you wish to make
them.
From the standpoint of creating a more pedestrian -friendly design and one that works better with terrain, staff
would like to make you aware of our concerns with the tall retaining wall proposed along Blue Ridge Avenue.
With 2 -story buildings above that retaining wall, the design may be overwhelming to the pedestrian. We would
recommend that you consider the following:
1. Consider grading changes to minimize use of walls over 6' tall.
2. Consider minimizing the creation of 2:1 slopes and opt for 3:1 slopes and 4:1 slopes which are
easier to walk on, easier to establish and maintain with vegetation, and easier to accommodate
steps.
We would also like to request that you provide a pedestrian connection from the west side of the
site to the proposed greenway trail along Powell's Creek. This would help residents of the
development more easily access the County's trail system.
Please contact Rachel Falkenstein in the Planning Division by using rfalkenstein@albemarle.org or 434-296-
5832 ext. 3272 for further information.
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Rachel Falkenstein, Planning
From: Matt Wentland, Engineering
Date: 4 April 2016
Subject: The Vue (SDP201600011)
The initial site plan for The Vue has been reviewed by Engineering. The following concerns should be
addressed on the final site plan:
A WPO submittal will be required containing ESC and SWM plans and a SWPPP [17-
300, 17-301]. Water quantity and water quality will need to be addressed under the IIB
criteria. The channels leading to Powell's Creek appear to be allowed under 18.30.3.11
for flood control, but will need to be designed per 9VAC25-870-66(B). No measures
were shown for water quality on the initial plan and will need to be addressed on the final
plan and with the VRRM Worksheet for New Development. Any land used as reserved
Forest/Open Space in the VRRM worksheet will need to be protected after construction
with a protective covenant or easement that will need to be reviewed by the County
Attorney and recorded by the Clerk's Office. Please note that Lickinghole Basin may be
used to account for 30% of the pollutant load leaving the site.
2. This site is subject to the Lickinghole Basin Fee.
3. The stream buffer should extend 100' on each side of the stream or to the limits of the
flood plain, whichever is wider (17-600(B)). Any disturbance in a stream buffer will
require a mitigation plan (17-406).
4. If the property will be later subdivided, the roads will need to be designed to
VDOT/County standards and a road plan submittal will be required before final plat
approval.
5. Grading is being shown right to the property line in several areas. Engineering
recommends that temporary grading easements are acquired from the neighboring
properties or that the grading is shown at least 5' from the property line.
6. Boilerplate wall details will not be acceptable and engineered retaining wall plans will be
required. A guardrail/barrier will be required at the ends of travelways/parking adjacent
to retaining walls and safety railing is required for retaining walls over 4' high.
File: SDP201600011 The Vue ISP Engineering Comments 2016-04-04.doc
Page 7 of 16
Maude Ginty
Service Auth6rity
TO: Rachel Falkenstein
FROM: Alexander J. Morrison, P.E., Civil Engineer
DATE: April 6, 2015
RE: Site Plan Technical Review for: SDP201600011: The Vue — Initial Site Plan
The below checked items apply to this site.
✓ 1. This site plan is within the Authority's jurisdictional area for:
✓
A. Water and sewer
B. Water only
C. Water only to existing structure
D. Limited service
✓ 2.
A 12 inch water line is located approximately (on site — RWSA Owned) distant.
3.
Fire flow from, nearest public hydrant, located distant from this site plan, is
Gpm + at 20 psi residual.
✓ 4.
An 8 inch sewer line is located approximately on site distant.
5.
An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be completed.
✓ 6.
No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within existing or future
easements.
7.
and plans are currently under review.
8.
and plans have been received and approved.
9.
No plans are required.
✓ 10.
Final water and sewer plans are required for our review and approval prior to
granting final site plan approval.
11.
Final site plan may/may not be signed.
✓ 12.
RWSA approval for water and/or sewer connections.
13.
City of Charlottesville approval for sewer.
Comments:
ACSA Construction Review will be required at the final site plan stage. Submit 3 copies of the plan, along with
water and sewer data sheets, to the ACSA, Attn: Michael Vieira, PE, when available.
RWSA Wastewater Certification will be required at the final site plan stage. The ACSA will file for this as part
of the construction review process.
RWSA approval of the water main connection is required.
The existing sewer infrastructure is incorrectly shown.
Shift the sewer main connection to an ACSA manhole outside of the floodplain.
Label the existing water and sewer by size, material and ownership.
The existing water main along Blue Ridge Avenue is owned by RWSA.
Relocate the fire line taps to the proposed internal water mains in lieu of tapping RWSA's transmission main.
168 Spotnap Road • Charlottesville • VA 22911 • Tel (434) 977-4511 • Fax (434) 979-0698
www.serviceauthority.org
Page 11 of 16
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1501 Orange Road
Culpeper, Virginia 22701
Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E.
Commissioner
March 10, 2016
Ms. Rachel Falkenstein
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Re: SDP -2016-00011 The Vue — Initial Site Plan
Dear Ms. Falkenstein
We have reviewed The Vue — Initial Site Plan; with an initial submittal date of February 26,
2016, as submitted by Hamrick Engineering, and have the following comments:
1. Please provide plans for Blue Ridge Avenue widening and typical sections for proposed
sidewalk and pavement
2. Please provide profiles for sightlines along Blue Ridge Avenue
3. Please provide MOT plan for the widening of Blue Ridge Avenue
4. Please provide hydraulic calculations for the new CG -6 curb along Blue Ridge Avenue
5. Please note the widening along Blue Ridge Avenue will need to be in accordance with
VDOT WP -2 standard
If you need further information concerning this project please do not hesitate to contact me at
434-422-9373.
Si r y
bel DeNunzio, P.E.
Resident Engineer
VDOT Charlottesville Residency
Page 12 of 16
Rachel Falkenstein
From:
Victoria Fort <vfort@rivanna.org>
Sent:
Thursday, April 21, 2016 6:12 PM
To:
Rachel Falkenstein
Cc:
Alex Morrison
Subject:
RE: SDP2016-11 The Vue
Attachments:
RWSA General Notes.doc
Rachel,
RWSA has reviewed the Preliminary Site Plan for The Vue as prepared by Hamrick Engineering, P.C. and dated 2/21/2016
and has the following comments:
General Project comments:
A flow capacity certification will be required prior to final site plan approval.
Sheet C2 of C16:
1. Include the most recent revision of the RWSA General Water & Sewer Notes (attached).
Sheet C3 of C16:
There are multiple easements shown on this sheet due to relocation of the sewer in 2011 for a VDOT Road
project. Confirm that all easements are current (not quitclaimed as part of the project).
Label the RWSA water easement (D.B. 3912 P. 563) shown on TMP 56-6A.
Sheet C11 of C16:
1. The RWSA sanitary sewer line was relocated in 2011 as part of a VDOT road project. Revise this sheet to show
the location of the new and abandoned sanitary sewer lines.
2. Label all RWSA and ACSA water and sewer lines with ownership, size, and material.
3. Due to the relocation of the RWSA sewer line, the proposed sewer connection is not feasible. For a 4' manhole,
there must be a minimum of 37 degrees of separation between each 8" connection into the manhole.
4. The engineer should coordinate with ACSA and RWSA to minimize the number of connections to the 12" water
main in Blue Ridge Avenue. The current configuration (showing four separate connections) will not be allowed.
5. Final site plans should include the following water and sewer connection notes:
a. RWSA Water Connection Notes:
i. Contractor shall coordinate with RWSA and ACSA during construction of the connection to the
existing RWSA 12" waterline. Contractor shall use due diligence to protect the RWSA 12"
waterline during construction and tapping.
ii. Contractor shall verify the horizontal and vertical location, the outside diameter and the pipe
material of the 12" waterline prior to ordering the tapping sleeve. RWSA shall be contacted 3
business days in advance of the test pit and shall be present during the test pit. The tapping
sleeve shall be approved by RWSA prior to being ordered. The tapping contractor shall be
approved by RWSA prior to the tap.
iii. A minimum of 3 business days' notice shall be given prior to installation of the tapping
sleeve. The tapping sleeve and valve shall be installed plumb. Following the placement of the
tapping sleeve, a concrete pad and thrust block shall be placed under and behind the tapping
sleeve and allowed to set before that tap is made.
iv. Prior to making the tap, the tapping sleeve and valve shall be subjected to a hydrostatic
pressure test. The test pressure shall be two hundred (200) psi or one and one half (1.5) times
the anticipated working pressure of the line, whichever is greater, for a duration of thirty (30)
minutes with no pressure drop.
Page 13 of 16
b. RWSA Sewer Connection Notes:
i. All connections to RWSA manholes shall be watertight and made with a flexible rubber boot.
ii. All coring methods, the coring contractor and all materials for construction shall be approved by
RWSA in writing prior to construction.
iii. RWSA Engineering Staff shall be present for all cores into the manholes. Contact RWSA
Engineering a minimum of 3 business days in advance to schedule a core of a manhole.
iv. Bypass pumping may be required at the sole discretion of RWSA staff.
v. Grouting of the manhole bench or interior may be required, at the sole discretion of RWSA staff,
for a smooth transition of flow.
vi. Existing manholes shall be backfilled to original grade to the satisfaction of RWSA.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Victoria
Victoria Fort, P.E.
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
695 Moores Creek Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(P): (434) 977-2970 ext. 205
(F): (434) 295-1146
Page 14 of 16
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority (RWSA)
General Water & Sanitary Sewer Notes
Last Revised: April 2016
1. All materials and methods of construction shall comply with the latest version of the General
Water and Sewer Design and Construction Standards — Version 1.0, adopted in December 2015,
except as modified below or modified in special notes.
2. RWSA shall approve all construction materials and methods of construction. A preconstruction
conference shall be held with RWSA prior to the start of any work.
3. The contractor shall be responsible for notifying Miss Utility (1-800-552-7001).
4. RWSA Engineer (Victoria Fort at (434) 977-2970 ext. 205) shall be notified three business days
prior to the start of construction.
5. All work is subject to inspection by RWSA staff. No tie-ins to the existing system shall be made
without coordination with and the presence of RWSA staff. No work shall be conducted on
RWSA facilities on weekends or holidays without special written permission from RWSA.
6. For sanitary sewer line construction: RWSA may require bypass pumping for tie-ins to the
existing system. All doghouse manholes must be pressure -tested before a connection is made to
the system.
7. The location of existing utilities as shown on the plans is from data available at the time of design
and is not necessarily complete or accurate. The Contractor shall be responsible for the
verification of the location, size and depth of all existing utilities, both surface and subsurface.
The Contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of any discrepancies between the plans and
field conditions. The Contractor shall use due diligence to protect all utilities and structures from
damage at all times, whether shown on the plans or not. Damage to any existing utilities shall be
repaired by the Contractor to the original condition at no additional cost to the Owner.
8. Erosion and sediment control facilities shall not be permitted in the RWSA easement without
special written permission from RWSA. No grading shall be permitted in the RWSA easement
unless permitted otherwise by RWSA in writing.
9. No blasting shall be permitted within 100 feet of RWSA facilities without written permission and
RWSA approval of the blasting plan. Ground monitoring during blasting and a pre -blast survey
may be required. For blasting within 100 feet of any operative RWSA sewerlines, bypass
pumping and/or pre- and post -CCTV may be required. RWSA may also require certification
from a licensed professional engineer stating that the proposed blasting will not damage any
RWSA facilities. Damage to any utilities due to blasting shall be repaired by the Contractor to
the original condition at no additional cost to the Owner.
10. The contractor shall observe minimum separation requirements for utility crossings. When a
crossing is made under an existing facility, adequate structural support shall be provided for the
existing pipe. The area of the crossing shall be backfilled with compacted 57 stone to the
springline of the existing pipe.
11. New water main installations shall be pressure tested, chlorinated, flushed and have water
samples approved prior to making any permanent connection to the public water system.
Approved methods of filling and flushing new water mains will be required to prevent any
contamination of the public water system.
12. All easements for new RWSA facilities shall be recorded prior to placing the new facilities into
service.
13. No permanent structural facilities will be permitted in the RWSA easement. This includes
building overhangs, retaining walls, footers for any structure, drainage structures, etc.
14. Trees are not permitted in the RWSA easement.
Page 15 of 16
A-18
GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR URBAN LOCAL STREET SYSTEM (GS -8)
GENERAL NOTES
Design Speed is not a major factor for local streets. For consistency
in design elements, design speeds ranging from 20 to 30 mph may
be used, depending on available right of way, terrain, adjacent
development and other area controls.
In the typical street grid, the closely spaced intersections usually limit
vehicular speeds, making the effect of a design speed of less
significance.
Design speeds exceeding 30 mph in residential areas may require
longer sight distances and increased curve radii, which would be
contrary to the basic function of a local street.
Standard TC -5.11 U (Urban) superelevation based on 4% maximum.
Standard TC -5.11 ULS (Urban Low Speed) superelevation based on
2% maximum may be used with a design speed of 45 mph or less.
For minimum widths for roadway and right of way used within
incorporated cities or towns to qualify for maintenance funds see
Code of Virginia Section 33.2-319.
FOOTNOTES
(3) Or equivalent City or Town design
(4) For buffer strip widths see Appendix A, Section A-5 Bicycle &
Pedestrian Facility Guidelines.
(5) A width of 8' or more may be needed in commercial areas.
(6) 3:1 and flatter slopes shall be used when the right of way is behind
the sidewalk (or sidewalk space) in residential or other areas
where slopes will be maintained by the property owner.
(7) When Design year ADT exceeds 2000 VPD, with greater than 5%
total truck and bus usage: Provide 4' wide paved shoulders when
the graded shoulder is 5' wide or greater. All shoulders not being
paved will have the mainline pavement structure extended 1', on
the same slope, into the shoulder to eliminate raveling at the
pavement edge (See Standard GS -12 for shoulder design).
(8) Ditch slopes to be 3:1 - 4' width. A hydraulic analysis is necessary
to determine actual depth requirement.
(9) See Manual of the Structure and Bridge Division — Volume V —
(1) Grades in commercial and industrial areas should be less than Part 2 Design Aids — Chapter 6 Geometrics.
8 percent; desirably, less than 5 percent. For maximum grades
relative to terrain and design speed, see AASHTO Green Book, (10) For additional information on sight distance requirements on
Chapter 5, Section 5.2.1, page 5-5, Table 5-4. grades of 3 percent or greater, see AASHTO Green Book,
(2) Where feasible, lanes should be 11' wide and in industrial areas Chapter 3, Section 3.2.2, page 3-3, Table 3-2.
should be 12' wide; however, where available or attainable right (11) For information on reduced shoulder widths, see AASHTO Green
of way imposes severe limitations, 9' lanes can be used in Book, Chapter 5, Section 5.2.2, page 5-6, Table 5-5.
residential areas and 11' lanes can be used in industrial areas.
FIGURE A - 1 - 8*
* Rev. 10/14
(1)
(10)
(2)
(3)
NEW AND
DESIGN
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM(5)
MINIMUM
STANDARD
BUFFER
RECONSTRUCTED
SPEED
RADIUS
PERCENT
STOPPING
WIDTH
CURB &
STRIP
MINIMUM
(6)
MINIMUM
(MPH)
OF
SIGHT
OF
GUTTER
WIDTH
SIDEWALK
SLOPE
BRIDGE WIDTHS
GRADE
DISTANCE
LANE
WIDTH
AND VERTICAL
CLEARANCES
U
ULS
STREET
30
251'
273'
200'
WITH
15
10'
CG -6
(4)
5'
2:1
25
155'
167'
155'
CURB &
20
92'
92'
125'
GUTTER
(7) (11)
MINIMUM(1)
(10)
(2)
MINIMUM
(8)
DESIGN
RADIUS
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MINIMUM
WIDTH
MINIMUM
See
SPEED
PERCENT
STOPPING
WIDTH
OF GRADED
WIDTH
SLOPE
Footnote
(MPH)
OF
SIGHT
OF
SHOULDERS
OF DITCH
(9)
GRADE
DISTANCE
LANE
FRONT
SLOPE
FILL
CUT&
U ULS
W/GR
FILL
(11)
30
251' 273'
200'
STREET
25
155' 167'
155'
WITH
15
10'
11'
8'
4'
3:1
SHOULDER
20
92' 92'
125'
DESIGN
GENERAL NOTES
Design Speed is not a major factor for local streets. For consistency
in design elements, design speeds ranging from 20 to 30 mph may
be used, depending on available right of way, terrain, adjacent
development and other area controls.
In the typical street grid, the closely spaced intersections usually limit
vehicular speeds, making the effect of a design speed of less
significance.
Design speeds exceeding 30 mph in residential areas may require
longer sight distances and increased curve radii, which would be
contrary to the basic function of a local street.
Standard TC -5.11 U (Urban) superelevation based on 4% maximum.
Standard TC -5.11 ULS (Urban Low Speed) superelevation based on
2% maximum may be used with a design speed of 45 mph or less.
For minimum widths for roadway and right of way used within
incorporated cities or towns to qualify for maintenance funds see
Code of Virginia Section 33.2-319.
FOOTNOTES
(3) Or equivalent City or Town design
(4) For buffer strip widths see Appendix A, Section A-5 Bicycle &
Pedestrian Facility Guidelines.
(5) A width of 8' or more may be needed in commercial areas.
(6) 3:1 and flatter slopes shall be used when the right of way is behind
the sidewalk (or sidewalk space) in residential or other areas
where slopes will be maintained by the property owner.
(7) When Design year ADT exceeds 2000 VPD, with greater than 5%
total truck and bus usage: Provide 4' wide paved shoulders when
the graded shoulder is 5' wide or greater. All shoulders not being
paved will have the mainline pavement structure extended 1', on
the same slope, into the shoulder to eliminate raveling at the
pavement edge (See Standard GS -12 for shoulder design).
(8) Ditch slopes to be 3:1 - 4' width. A hydraulic analysis is necessary
to determine actual depth requirement.
(9) See Manual of the Structure and Bridge Division — Volume V —
(1) Grades in commercial and industrial areas should be less than Part 2 Design Aids — Chapter 6 Geometrics.
8 percent; desirably, less than 5 percent. For maximum grades
relative to terrain and design speed, see AASHTO Green Book, (10) For additional information on sight distance requirements on
Chapter 5, Section 5.2.1, page 5-5, Table 5-4. grades of 3 percent or greater, see AASHTO Green Book,
(2) Where feasible, lanes should be 11' wide and in industrial areas Chapter 3, Section 3.2.2, page 3-3, Table 3-2.
should be 12' wide; however, where available or attainable right (11) For information on reduced shoulder widths, see AASHTO Green
of way imposes severe limitations, 9' lanes can be used in Book, Chapter 5, Section 5.2.2, page 5-6, Table 5-5.
residential areas and 11' lanes can be used in industrial areas.
FIGURE A - 1 - 8*
* Rev. 10/14