HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201600023 Review Comments 2016-05-31Short Review Comments Report for:
SDP201600023
SubApplication Type:
Harvest Moon - Phase 1 - Final
Final Plat
Date Completed:08/11/2016
Reviewer:Max Greene
Review Status:See Recommendations
Reviews Comments:Plat does not match the site plan for storm drain easement section E-8 on the plat last revision date
08-02-16. I called Dustin Greene from Dominion Engineering and he stated the field survey for the
plat was correct and the site and VSMP plans will be adjusted to match the field conditions.
Division:
Date Completed:04/29/2016
Reviewer:Megan Yaniglos CDD Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:04/30/2016
Reviewer:John Anderson CDD Engineering
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:04/15/2016
Reviewer:Andrew Slack CDD E911
Review Status:Approved
Reviews Comments:Approved.
Division:
Date Completed:04/20/2016
Reviewer:Jay Schlothauer CDD Inspections
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated March 31, 2016.
No comments or conditions.
Division:
Date Completed:05/03/2016
Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue Admin
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Based on plans dated 3/31/16.
1. Please add a note "Knox box required, Please contact the Albemarle County Fire Marshal office
for location."
Division:
Date Completed:05/18/2016
Reviewer:Alexander Morrison ACSA
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:05/12/2016
Reviewer:Joel DeNunzio VDOT
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Page:1 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On:February 09, 2017
Date Completed:06/08/2016
Reviewer:Megan Yaniglos CDD Planning
Review Status:Requested Changes
Reviews Comments:Plat needs to be approved prior to site plan approval.
Division:
Date Completed:05/29/2016
Reviewer:John Anderson CDD Engineering
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:
Division:
Date Completed:05/31/2016
Reviewer:Robbie Gilmer Fire Rescue Admin
Review Status:No Objection
Reviews Comments:Based on plans dated 5/17/16.
No comments or objections.
Division:
Page:2 of 2 County of Albemarle Printed On:February 09, 2017
Project:
Plan preparer
Owner or rep.
Plan received date:
(FSP)
(Rev. 2)
Date of comments:
(FSP)
(Rev. 2)
Reviewer:
Project Coordinator:
4OF A�
a -n
vfRG7N7P
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Final Site Plan for Harvest Moon —Phase I
Mike Myers, Dominion Engineering [172 S. Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911, mmyers(a-dominionene coml
Harvest Moon Catering Co./Mark Hahn
946 Grady Ave/Ste. 11, Charlottesville, VA 22901
17 Feb 2016 (Initial Site Plan; SDP201600004)
12 Apr 2016
23 May 2016
26 Feb 2016 (ISP)
30 Apr 2016
29 May 2016
John Anderson
Megan Yaniglos
SDP201600023 (See Also SDP201600004)
Phase I Engineering plan review comments have been addressed with this or prior submittal No objection to Plan.
Note several comments relate to future Phase II
SP -2 —Check Impervious Area Summary table: Bld 1 /Travelway values, Phase 1 v. Phase 1 & 2 differ.
Confirm values are accurate. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
SP -2 —Check Impervious Area Summary table/Phase 1 & 2: Include building 4. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
SP -3 —There are dissimilarities of existing condition features between this plan and VSMP/WPO Plan
(WP0201600011). For example: Ex. Shed, Ex. Trailer, Existing Ditch (SP3) are labelled Cinder block
building, Cinder block building, and Intermittent Stream (WPO/sheet SW3). Please reconcile, especially
stream/ditch. Provide evidence to support proper description of this feature (intermittent stream v. ditch).
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
Existing storm drain/SDMH 203 —Ensure design will support high -frequency truck traffic. (Rev. 1)
Addressed.
SP -4
5. Provide pavement design relative to high -frequency truck traffic, appropriate to proposed use. [Ref. VDOT
Pavement Design Guide] (Rev. 1) Addressed.
6. Please turn off (SP3) existing conditions layer. Underlying existing features obscure details on this sheet.
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
7. At top of hill/New 20' -wide paved access down to building 1: Provide auto -turn for vehicles anticipated to
serve catering business; recommend consider extended length vehicles/fire rescue vehicles (Ref. Attached
ACF&R .xls/wheelbase length). Recommend remove west half of north -most parking lot raised island, and
add yellow No parking' striping to the north -most parking space, west row of Ex. parking lot —that is,
sacrifice a parking space. Auto -turn may help inform design decisions at this location. (Rev. 1)
Addressed.
8. Given approx. 6% grade, steeper in places (16 -ft vertical: Ex. parking adjacent to Berkmar Drive to parking
spaces in front of building 1), recommend a storm inlet midway down this portion of access. If opt for inlet
midway down, specify CG -6 as opposed to CG -2. (Rev. 1) Addressed. As follow-up: Recommend spot
elevation at inlet 3B to ensure positive drainage. Continue CG -6 through 15' R curve. Transition 2' gutter
to flat /slight reverse slope prior to dumpster. Do not want gutter runoff at this location to reach dumpster
enclosure. Do not want curbless pavement at this location (fracture). Current design may release runoff
contained in gutter, north and off -pavement. This poses both storm management and erosion concerns.
(Rev. 2) Addressed.
9. Please revise rain garden labels to read `Potential phase II SWM (rain garden).' (Rev. 1) Addressed.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
10. Engineering recommends Title of Site Plan reference (or Planning process/Planning site plan approval
explicitly limit approval to) Phase 1. WP0201600011 only covers Phase 1. Engineering defers to
Planning. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
11. Recommend design (and design note) end Phase 1 paving at edge of building 1 parking/loading area. (Rev.
1) Addressed.
12. Recommend curb cut at future phase II access, building 1 loading area to future building 3, to avoid
expense of curb demolition. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
13. Future access, building 3 —recommend stop bars, speed bumps, mirrors, signs, or other safety/speed control
measures to assist vehicles navigate blind corner at SE edge of building 1, whether approaching or leaving
building 3. (Rev. 1) Addressed /comment applies to future Phase II.
14. Compare NW corner, building 1, with short section of retaining wall, WP0201600011, sheet SW6. Show
retaining wall, if retaining wall proposed. Label 80 IF building retaining wall (see SW6), if design detail
applies. (Rev. 1) Addressed. Asfollow-up (gabion basket design): shift baskets to avoid deck. Also,
recommend gabion basket detail specify wire lacing and basket wire gauge. (Rev. 2) Addressed.
15. Label all curb radii, including small radius (curb) nose at top of the hill, at site access (existing parking lot).
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
16. Label /provide minimum 6' -wide sidewalk in front of building 1. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
17. Show/provide hardscape access for building 2 (walk/parking, if any). Revise Impervious Area Summary
table to include building 2 walkway —be mindful of sidewalk maximum grade/ADA requirements.
[Maximum grade is 5% -VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix A, p. A-121' (Rev. 1) Addressed /comment
applies to future Phase II.
18. Reference building 1 outline, WP0201600011, SW6 —front office/lobby FF =489; rest of building FF
=487.00. Please show lobby/main building architectural interface. Plans should match. (Rev. 1)
Addressed.
19. Apply SP4 storm drain design to WP0201600011, sheets SW6, SW8, SW9, with storm pipe connecting
inlet 3E and inlet IA. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
20. Label inlets (inlet ID). (Rev. 1) Addressed.
21. Label storm pipes (#). (Rev. 1) Addressed.
22. Include WP0201600011, sheet SW9 (revised; ref. #19) as separate site plan sheet. Drainage should
accompany site plan details, since no road plan. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
23. Include demolition details/sheet with site plan. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
24. Provide additional existing contour labels. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
SP5
25. Access/additional:
a. Show proposed grades; grade differential approaches 16' top/bottom. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
b. Tie proposed grades to existing grades that border access, left/right. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
26. Provide additional existing grade labels. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
27. Extend existing contour lines at least 50 -ft beyond property lines. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
28. Acquire temporary construction easement, as necessary, from TMP45-112G1 (Medical spa) to construct
proposed grades/improvements. (Rev. 1) Addressed /easement not required. "No disturbance will occur on
this property" [1 -Apr 2016 Applicant response letter].
29. Provide fine grade/spot elevations at SDMH 203 to ensure MH top/new Access pavement align. (Rev. 1)
Addressed.
30. Ensure site plan /WPO plan proposed grades match on west side of building 1. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
31. Turn off existing conditions layer. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
SP6
32. Please show (realistic) conceptual design location for proposed phase 2 150 LF 60" DIA detention pipe
which should be sited in location to receive runoff from all additional impervious added with Phase II.
(Rev. 1) Addressed /comment applies to future Phase II.
33. Revise Preliminary Stormwater Management Narrative to state approximately 3,050 cubic feet. Figure
may change if Impervious Area Summary Table is revised to include building 4/building 2 sidewalk. (Rev.
1) Addressed /Narrative revised, reference to Phase II removed.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
34. Please revise (insert text in) SWM Narrative (toward end) "...both Phase 1 and Phase 2 to show that an
adequate channel exists to convey site or off-site water that transits the site to the existing Kegler's pond."
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
35. Ref Attached 11/5/15 email to Mike Myers re. As -built survey of Kegler's pond. All items appear to have
been considered with WPO201600011 design, except item #1. WPO plan review comment will request a
Construction Record Drawing of `Kegler's Pond' to determine true dimensions and capacity; basin outfall
structures must be included." [11/5; 9/2/15 email] WPO plan approval is required for site plan approval.
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
36. Turn off existing conditions layer. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
37. SP8• SP9 —Recommend copy Impervious Area Summary table from SP2 to these sheets; revise table if
necessary. (Rev. 1) Recommendation not accepted.
38. SP9 —Recommend revise Summary Note to state impervious area with phase 1 also includes removal of
Go -Kart track. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
39. Please confirm whether Ex. Drainage Easement, DB 1454/PG637 is sufficient to convey site runoff to
Kegler's pond. Existing contours in area of outfall 1 (WPO/SW6) appear to show site runoff will discharge
to adjacent property, not necessarily a defined channel, or will be confined to Ex. drainage easement.
"There can be no off-site impact due to re -development of TMP 45-112G." [11/5; 9/2/15 email -Attached]
Demonstrate site runoff will reach Kegler's pond. Acquire additional Drainage Easement if necessary.
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
L�.I'b Tp Tel' Ca•ShT•L"ayW •\
S C T.4.de
n,o asuotl..�sS uyiTea
. I ♦RTtiE•[•.ra,w yr/.•i9'TYE�A4,ii'
iljlll oe•r'w r,» oTc�,,�n,c.e t.•ncw..a.l..es.,e•J
�� T.NS4 A'�F'r� � �R, �$e e�•g1Fs CDwSbY+„sT•w
G•M,np'
1M •e-rra R`Y.Tp}.5p'.L•ap.lp'
ce.o.a-AI'dv,a
M!N xCLVH lA[tYexTt C..OAp'
eupVe 'A' He,te4+p [O IT ORA,4wLE E44EY•�FjjY
Aeslwe'r �.u.�.w: sc rr
Ia.ws,ee sa eY
RHI W e 'c e.a..ss Ip Ir
R4pNT-01• WAY
pnglx/,L R1UICeL a a,aat.le ep pT T_"
ea,lee.Yr ep Tr STunRO T fir\ K
�aHNlXY M[! CCD RG4RL'
ATeMTXIx ppxp [AHXIYT a,HL1a f0 IT �� �M �'wZ
wATlRLIN[ [N!YlxT'A• 1,e0eJa ep rT
WAT[RLlxe eAe[Ml NT'0' 9.IH,ee tp IT
yli•+4'4SY-yl,lp' AlxApt IaHYlNr •A• [I,ar ep pT
pRAIN[Y[Y[XT'e' T,Hr.H i0-pT
DLYInAnQTy P(]110 pRA"aIXAp[ eyeY[NT'C'
-KMEIST �.O• -^—IRAHY[NT�p'
ZL4 =T, ON—A0.eA[eY[Xr'e• etwT ap n
M
uzLw,'tiT•x-L�.as' •L
f pVypRAIL Wewxr'A•
Gepee fp R
= avMeRAa uHY[xT •s•
A I +`? / +'+C .LCRS OF C'NLRCMT^S•n E
9 � YY+•aa"Oaf•a-LS.C1pr
YN[ oS px:ATOx wap cpxveYaXce pr pNppeRT,. RIONT pI. Y'AY ANO
e4[YLX Te AI eNpwx N[a[pN 1e wITN TN[ IR[[ COx[eNT M9 IN
T[ a H��_01 iyEyyp[A[IpXep gwNe R1,
Contact John Anderson, Engineering Dept., if any questions.
janderson2a,albemarle.ore / 434-296-5832 —0069
Thank you
File: SDP201600023_Harvest Moon FSP_ph.I 052916 No objection
Megan Yaniglos
From: Alexander Morrison<amorrison@serviceauthority.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 10:23 AM
To: Megan Yaniglos
Subject: SDP2016023: Harvest moon - Phase 1 Final
Megan,
The above referenced plan is currently under Construction Plan Review at the ACSA. Michael Vieira is the reviewer. I will
advise once approval has been granted.
Alexander J. Morrison, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Albemarle County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22911
(0) 434-977-4511 Ext. 116
(C) 434-981-5577
(F) 434-979-0698
4OF A�
a -n
vfRG7N7P
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Project: Final Site Plan for Harvest Moon —Phase I
Plan preparer: Mike Myers, Dominion Engineering [172 S. Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911, mmyers(&dominionene coral
Owner or rep.: Harvest Moon Catering Co./Mark Hahn
946 Grady Ave/Ste. 11, Charlottesville, VA 22901
Plan received date: 17 Feb 2016 (Initial Site Plan; SDP201600004)
(FSP) 12 Apr 2016
Date of comments: 26 Feb 2016 (ISP)
(FSP) 30 Apr 2016
Reviewer: John Anderson
Project Coordinator: Megan Yaniglos
SDP201600023 (See Also SDP201600004)
1. SP -2 —Check Impervious Area Summary table: Bld 1/Travelway values, Phase 1 v. Phase 1 & 2 differ.
Confirm values are accurate. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
2. SP -2 —Check Impervious Area Summary table/Phase 1 & 2: Include building 4. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
3. SP -3 —There are dissimilarities of existing condition features between this plan and VSMP/WPO Plan
(WP0201600011). For example: Ex. Shed, Ex. Trailer, Existing Ditch (SP3) are labelled Cinder block
building, Cinder block building, and Intermittent Stream (WPO/sheet SW3). Please reconcile, especially
stream/ditch. Provide evidence to support proper description of this feature (intermittent stream v. ditch).
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
4. sting storm drain/SDMH 203 —Ensure design will support high -frequency truck traffic. (Rev. 1)
Addressed.
SP -4
5. Provide pavement design relative to high -frequency truck traffic, appropriate to proposed use. [Ref. VDOT
Pavement Design Guide] (Rev. 1) Addressed.
6. Please turn off (SP3) existing conditions layer. Underlying existing features obscure details on this sheet.
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
7. At top of hill/New 20' -wide paved access down to building 1: Provide auto -turn for vehicles anticipated to
serve catering business; recommend consider extended length vehicles/fire rescue vehicles (Ref. Attached
ACF&R .xls/wheelbase length). Recommend remove west half of north -most parking lot raised island, and
add yellow No parking' striping to the north -most parking space, west row of Ex. parking lot —that is,
sacrifice a parking space. Auto -turn may help inform design decisions at this location. (Rev. 1)
Addressed.
8. Given approx. 6% grade, steeper in places (16 -ft vertical: Ex. parking adjacent to Berkmar Drive to parking
spaces in front of building 1), recommend a storm inlet midway down this portion of access. If opt for inlet
midway down, specify CG -6 as opposed to CG -2. (Rev. 1) Addressed. As follow-up: Recommend spot
elevation at inlet 3B to ensure positive drainage. Continue CG -6 through 15' R curve. Transition 2' gutter
to flat /slight reverse slope prior to dumpster. Do not want gutter runoff at this location to reach dumpster
enclosure. Do not want curbless pavement at this location (fracture). Current design may release runoff
contained in gutter, north and off -pavement. This poses both storm management and erosion concerns.
9. Please revise rain garden labels to read `Potential phase II SWM (rain garden).' (Rev. 1) Addressed.
10. Engineering recommends Title of Site Plan reference (or Planning process/Planning site plan approval
explicitly limit approval to) Phase 1. WP0201600011 only covers Phase 1. Engineering defers to
Planning. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
11. Recommend design (and design note) end Phase 1 paving at edge of building 1 parking/loading area. (Rev.
1) Addressed.
Engineering Review Comments
Page 2 of 3
12. Recommend curb cut at future phase II access, building 1 loading area to future building 3, to avoid
expense of curb demolition. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
13. Future access, building 3 —recommend stop bars, speed bumps, mirrors, signs, or other safety/speed control
measures to assist vehicles navigate blind corner at SE edge of building 1, whether approaching or leaving
building 3. (Rev. 1) Addressed /comment applies to future Phase II.
14. Compare NW corner, building 1, with short section of retaining wall, WP0201600011, sheet SW6. Show
retaining wall, if retaining wall proposed. Label 80 IF building retaining wall (see SW6), if design detail
applies. (Rev. 1) Addressed. Asfollow-up (gabion basket design): shift baskets to avoid deck. Also,
recommend gabion basket detail specify wire lacing and basket wire gauge.
15. Label all curb radii, including small radius (curb) nose at top of the hill, at site access (existing parking lot).
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
16. Label /provide minimum 6' -wide sidewalk in front of building 1. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
17. Show/provide hardscape access for building 2 (walk/parking, if any). Revise Impervious Area Summary
table to include building 2 walkway —be mindful of sidewalk maximum grade/ADA requirements.
[Maximum grade is 5% -VDOT Road Design Manual, Appendix A, p. A-121]. (Rev. 1) Addressed /comment
applies to future Phase II.
18. Reference building 1 outline, WP0201600011, SW6 —front office/lobby FF =489; rest of building FF
=487.00. Please show lobby/main building architectural interface. Plans should match. (Rev. 1)
Addressed.
19. Apply SP4 storm drain design to WP0201600011, sheets SW6, SW8, SW9, with storm pipe connecting
inlet 3E and inlet IA. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
20. Label inlets (inlet ID). (Rev. 1) Addressed.
21. Label storm pipes (#). (Rev. 1) Addressed.
22. Include WP0201600011, sheet SW9 (revised; ref. #19) as separate site plan sheet. Drainage should
accompany site plan details, since no road plan. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
23. Include demolition details/sheet with site plan. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
24. Provide additional existing contour labels. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
SP5
25. Access/additional:
a. Show proposed grades; grade differential approaches 16' top/bottom. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
b. Tie proposed grades to existing grades that border access, left/right. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
26. Provide additional existing grade labels. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
27. Extend existing contour lines at least 50 -ft beyond property lines. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
28. Acquire temporary construction easement, as necessary, from TMP45-112G1 (Medical spa) to construct
proposed grades/improvements. (Rev. 1) Addressed /easement not required. "No disturbance will occur on
this property" [1 -Apr 2016 Applicant response letter].
29. Provide fine grade/spot elevations at SDMH 203 to ensure MH top/new Access pavement align. (Rev. 1)
Addressed.
30. Ensure site plan /WPO plan proposed grades match on west side of building 1. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
31. Turn off existing conditions layer. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
SP6
32. Please show (realistic) conceptual design location for proposed phase 2 150 LF 60" DIA detention pipe
which should be sited in location to receive runoff from all additional impervious added with Phase II.
(Rev. 1) Addressed /comment applies to future Phase II.
33. Revise Preliminary Stormwater Management Narrative to state approximately 3,050 cubic feet. Figure
may change if Impervious Area Summary Table is revised to include building 4/building 2 sidewalk. (Rev.
1) Addressed /Narrative revised, reference to Phase II removed.
34. Please revise (insert text in) SWM Narrative (toward end) "...both Phase 1 and Phase 2 to show that an
adequate channel exists to convey site or off-site water that transits the site to the existing Kegler's pond."
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
35. Ref Attached 11/5/15 email to Mike Myers re. As -built survey of Kegler's pond. All items appear to have
been considered with WP0201600011 design, except item #1. WPO plan review comment will request a
Construction Record Drawing of `Kegler's Pond' to determine true dimensions and capacity; basin outfall
Engineering Review Comments
Page 3 of 3
structures must be included." [11/5; 9/2/15 email] WPO plan approval is required for site plan approval.
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
36. Turn off existing conditions layer. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
37. SP8, SP9 —Recommend copy Impervious Area Summary table from SP2 to these sheets; revise table if
necessary. (Rev. 1) Recommendation not accepted.
38. SP9 —Recommend revise Summary Note to state impervious area with phase 1 also includes removal of
Go -Kart track. (Rev. 1) Addressed.
39. Please confirm whether Ex. Drainage Easement, DB 1454/PG637 is sufficient to convey site runoff to
Kegler's pond. Existing contours in area of outfall I (WPO/SW6) appear to show site runoff will discharge
to adjacent property, not necessarily a defined channel, or will be confined to Ex. drainage easement.
"There can be no off-site impact due to re -development of TMP 45-112G." [11/5; 9/2/15 email -Attached]
Demonstrate site runoff will reach Kegler's pond. Acquire additional Drainage Easement if necessary.
(Rev. 1) Addressed.
T3T ws-1ne � •i� c
R10 45SCIClATES 4M5TCD
YlST4�TCw455•
96Y/ 1`IyY Ol{454
0.bE F.b.SEMf•.4-f 'ti 0.�S54LE`q'
T•+ V.AS Y4 rt ��L5 x,5.50 meq^
Contact John Anderson, Engineering Dept, if any questions.
ianderson2galbemarle.org / 434-296-5832 —x3069
Thank you
File: SDP201600023_Harvest Moon_FSP_ph.I 043016
CE•9+6'ii'yYV
Mey 5xt �uW [YtMaxT[
4.4e.'•O,
RSHOvt 'A
MOM,: aO IT
OR451Jl�E E44ET4C.1.T
R[FIWa'a'
40R
Y.4¢L.A 1C�4
x[alWa'C'
xroxr-er-war
eeAAt aO IT
MgIx4 rA[C[L
• r a4 R
ra•a [•
�'Y5 ♦y-112
[ a[
SYVISAD n d11 4 MAt�C 6T4C
Aim
paT[xTgx Ppxe [Ae[YaxT
AT[xtlxt [,yard MT'A•
e,a-a.0 so R
fi4041•
VtlOb
WATt[LIx[ t14l Ml
a0 TT
-,405.3[ tC R
V lt•+L'4TM-3110
deAixAOt ."oft- -1
-1
e[,J5 a0 rT
.:=1 ."a.eIT'['
T,aR,a[ f0'rT
ELt'Y101i PpLLp
4
OxAxAPt CAa[M[.T •C'
t.•[4.aa t0 R
£4�1`"r•iF..>•SZ
'��'t8.4'C � FT ==944H
D[ArxApa [Ate M[x T'0'T.ft
OxAIxAO[ [NeM[MT'C.
[O rT-!.•T
Y-lt'M.'4T•+,f-LS. pei' •i? E
A —All T•A•
aC R
411A AIL MAa[M[xT -I-
40,13 [C
n •
C*S..Rt1 TT^Sv1u.e
f �'3A'49'OT-•C-2Ti.G10�
wnpx wxD cOxy[rwxC[ Dr PROP[xnY,
!we[Yt4T- Al exDwy x[e[0x 1a 1 rx[!
4c
MOOT-OI-wAY
Gpx[-xT AN9 m
'''D' Ty{yy0[x4�0x-0 pwM[tf,
Cly�x[�- �Or
Contact John Anderson, Engineering Dept, if any questions.
ianderson2galbemarle.org / 434-296-5832 —x3069
Thank you
File: SDP201600023_Harvest Moon_FSP_ph.I 043016
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To:
Dustin Green (dgreen@dominioneng.com)
From:
Megan Yaniglos, AICP- Principal Planner
Division:
Planning Services
Date:
April 29, 2016
Subject:
SDP -2016-023 Harvest Moon- Phase I- Final Site Plan
The Planner for the Planning Services Division of the Albemarle County Department Community
Development will recommend approve the plan referred to above when the following items
have been satisfactorily addressed. (The following comments are those that have been
identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may be added or eliminated based
on further review.) [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference to the Albemarle
County Code.]
Requirements:
1. [32.5.2(1)] A plat and associated deeds will be required for all easements prior to final
site plan approval.
2. [32.7.9.4(b)(1 and 2)] Since you are using existing landscaping for your tree canopy
calculation, you need to show the limits of clearing and location and type of protective
fencing on the landscape plan. In addition, a conservation plan checklist to be filled out
and signed by the owner needs to be added to the plans. Also, indicate the type of
existing wooded areas, evergreen, deciduous, or mix.
3. [32.7.9.5] Street trees are required to be provided along existing streets. Provide trees
in accordance with this section along the frontage of Berkmar. In addition, shrubs also
need to be provided for screening along the existing parking area in accordance with
this section. If there are existing trees or shrubs that meet this requirement, show them
on the plan.
4. [32.7.9.6] Kousa Dogwood is not a large or medium shade tree as required for parking
lot tree per this section. Provide a large or medium shade tree from the recommended
plant list.
http://www.albemarle.org/upload/images/forms center/departments/Community Dev
elopment/forms/applications/Plant List Approved Species 04 21 03.pdf
5. [32.7.9.7] The plant legend states that the plants for screening along the property line in
the buffer are Ilex glabra, however the table lists Cryptomeria. These are two different
plants. Clarify and provide landscaping that is from the recommended list for screening.
In addition, screening should be provided all along the travelway and to the dumpster
since the adjacent parcel is zoned residential, as screening is required for commercial
uses.
Please contact Megan Yaniglos at the Department of Community Development 296-5832
ext. 3004 for further information.
a t
Nome
.4600,
♦c
e o%s
o,` e'40.0 Dominion
any`1 , Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
t�� IP& 434.979.8121 (p)
447Oer
e s 434.979.1681 (f)
cts
DominionEng.com
April 1, 2016
Ms. Megan Yaniglos
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Harvest Moon Final Site Plan
Dear Megan,
Please see our response below to County comments dated 7 March 2016 on the referenced plan.
John Anderson, Civil Engineer II
Engineering
1. SP-2—Check Impervious Area Summary table:Bid 1/Travelway values,Phase 1 v. Phase I&2 differ. Confirm
values are accurate.
Response: The proposed Impervious Area Summary Table is up to date and accurate.
2. SP-2—Check Impervious Area Summary Table/Phase 1 &2: Include building 4.
Response: (WPO response) Building 4 has been included in our impervious calculations. For
clarification of impervious area please note that the difference in EX Impervious area to remain is
3,000 sf less in Phase 2 because Building 4 is replacing impervious parking.
3. SP-3—There are dissimilarities of existing condition features between this plan and VSMP/WPO Plan(WPO2O
1600011).For example: Ex. Shed,Ex.Trailer,Existing Ditch(SP3)are labelled Cinder block building,Cinder block
building,and Intermittent Stream(WPOlshcet SW3).Please reconcile,especially stream/ditch. Provide evidence to
support proper description of this feature(intermittent stream v.ditch).
Response: SP3 has been updated to reflect field conditions. The intermittent streams have been
labeled as such and we have included a letter from Environmental Scientist David Powell
confirming this. Stream#2 is labeled as non-perennial in his report but after discussion with Mr.
Powell, I confirmed that Stream#2 is intermittent.
4. Existing storm drain/SDMH 203 --Ensure design will support high-frequency truck traffic.
Response: SDMH 203 is to be replaced with a VDOT std. DI-1,which is designed to withstand
HS-20 loading. The DI-1 is labeled as structure#4.
5. Provide pavement design relative to high-frequency truck traffic,appropriate to proposed use. [Ref. VDOT
Pavement Design Guide]
Response: The proposed pavement design as provided by the geotechnical engineer is shown on
sheet SP4. Please see geotechnical report and email from geotechnical engineer updating TYPE II
Section using geogrid.
NOW
%s
s oe
410O%s 3,
%40 ►s) Dominion
any`I IP
h. Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Awl Charlottesville, VA 22911
, s 434.979.8121 (p)
4lte ers 434.979.1681 (f)
its DominionEng.com
6. Please turn off(SP3)existing conditions layer.Underlying existing features obscure details on this sheet.
Response: Existing layers have been turned off for clarity on SP4 and SP5.
7.At top of hill/New 20'-wide paved access down to building 1: Provide auto-turn for vehicles anticipated to serve
catering business;recommend consider extended length vehicles/fire rescue vehicles(Ref.Attached ACF&R
.xls/wheelbase length). Recommend remove west half of north-most parking lot raised island,and add yellow 'No
parking' striping to the north-most parking space,west row of Ex.parking lot—that is, sacrifice a parking space.
Auto-turn may help inform design decisions at this location.
Response: Autoturn exhibit has been added to sheet SP4.
8.Given approx.6%grade, steeper in places(16-fl vertical: Ex.parking adjacent to Berkmar Drive to parking
spaces in front of building 1),recommend a storm inlet midway down this portion of access. If opt for inlet midway
down,specify CG-6 as opposed to CG-2.
Response: Inlet 4A has been added to the storm sewer schedule with CG-6 designation.
9.Please revise rain garden labels to read`Potential phase II SWM(rain garden).'
Response: Phase II SWM design is to be provided with Phase II WPO plans.
10.Engineering recommends Title of Site Plan reference(or Planning process/Planning site plan approval explicitly
limit approval to)Phase 1. WPO2O 1600011 covers Phase 1.Engineering defers to Planning.
Response: Reference to WPO 2016-00011 has been added to cover sheet.
11.Recommend design(and design note)end Phase I paving at edge of building I parking/loading area.
Response: The design has been revised so the paving ends at the edge of Building 1.
12.Recommend curb cut at future phase II access,building 1 loading area to future building 3,to avoid expense of
curb demolition.
Response: A curb cut has is no longer needed since the paving now ends at the building. See
response to comment 11.
13.Future access,building 3—recommend stop bars, speed bumps,mirrors, signs,or other safety/speed control
measures to assist vehicles navigate blind corner at SE edge of building 1,whether approaching or leaving building
3.
Response: Final Site Plan Building 3 is a part of Phase II. Comment will be addressed with Phase
II submittal.
14. Compare NW corner,building 1,with short section of retaining wall,WP0201600011,sheet SW6. Show
retaining wall,if retaining wall proposed.Label 80 LF building retaining nail(see SW6), if design detail applies.
2 of 8
;s
�s
cents
�,�440 Dominion
a yi i hi Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
i Charlottesville, VA 22911
"ads % Wi
434.979.8121 (p)
4' *e 434.979.1681 (f)
Bets DominionEng.com
Response: Plan has been revised to provide 3'x3'x3'gabion baskets to serve as retaining wall at
NW corner of building. See fine grading sheet SP6 and detail sheet SP11.
15. Label all curb radii, including small radius(curb)nose at top of the hill,at site access(existing parking lot).
Response: All curb radii has been labeled on sheet SP4.
16.Label/provide minimum 6'-wide sidewalk in front of building 1.
Response: 6'-wide sidewalk has been labeled in front of Building 1.
17. Show/provide hardscape access for building 2(walk/parking,if any).Revise Impervious Area Summary table to
include building 2 walkway—be mindful of sidewalk maximum grade/ADA requirements. [Maximum grade is 5%
-VDOT Road Design Manual,Appendix A,p.A-121].
Response: Hardscape access for Building 2 will be provided with Phase II.
18.Reference building 1 outline,WP0201600011, SW6—front office/lobby FF=489;rest of building FF=487.00.
Please show lobby/main building architectural interface. Plans should match.
Response: The building outline has been revised to match building plans.
19.Apply SP4 storm drain design to WP201600011 ,sheets SW6,SW8, SW9,with storm pipe connecting inlet 3E
and inlet IA.
Response: The storm sewer design has been updated and shown on all pertinent sheets of the
Final Site Plan. The WPO plan will be revised with the approved submission.
20. Label inlets(inlet ID).
Response: The inlet ID's have been labeled.
21. Label storm pipes(#).
Response: The storm pipe numbers have been labeled.
22. Include WPO201600011,sheet SW9(revised ref.#19)as separate site plan sheet. Drainage should accompany
site plan details, since no road plan.
Response: Drainage information has been provided on sheet SP9.
23. Include demolition details/sheet with site plan.
Response: The demo plan has been provided on sheet SP3.
24.Provide additional existing contour labels.
3 of 8
ce a1s
�46 4010 Dominion
ir' 111.
Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
oe'4% 'I,
k " � 434.979.8121
e ers ' 434.979.1681 (f)
cts DominionEng.com
Response: Additional existing contour labels have been provided with this submittal.
25.Access/additional:
a. Show proposed grades;grade differential approaches 16'top/bottom.
b.Tie proposed grades to existing grades that border access, left/right.
Response: The proposed grades and tie-ins have been shown on this submittal.
26.Provide additional existing grade labels.
Response: See response 24.
27. Extend existing contour lines at least 50-ft beyond property lines.
Response: The existing contour lines have been extended 50-ft+from the property line.
28.Acquire temporary construction easement,as necessary,from TMP45-112G1 (Medical spa)to construct
proposed grades/improvements.
Response: A temporary construction easement will not be necessary from TMP 45-112G1. No
disturbance will occur on this property. A note has been added to sheet SP5.
29.Provide fine grade/spot elevations at SDMH 203 to ensure MH top/new Access pavement align.
Response: A spot shot has been provided in the plan view and the profile labeled accordingly.
30. Ensure site plan/WPO plan proposed grades match on west side of building 1.
Response: The proposed grades match the WPO plan.
31.Turn off existing conditions layer.
Response: The existing conditions layer has been turned off on the Site sheets.
SP6
32.Please show(realistic)conceptual design location for proposed phase 2 150 LF 60"DIA detention pipe which
should be sited in location to receive runoff from all additional impervious added with Phase II.
Response: The proposed conceptual design location for phase II will be shown with the phase II
Site Plan.
33.Revise Preliminary Stormwater Management Narrative to state approximately 3,050 cubic feet.Figure may
change if Impervious Area Summary Table is revised to include building 4/building 2 sidewalk.
4 of 8
Avow
et S
moil%40,•1 Dominion
0 (
y Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
t),%tea 0111
' 434.979.8121 (p)
4_ �e 434.979.1681
ects DominionEng.com
Response: The Stormwater Narrative has been updated but does not include anything concerning
phase II.
34.Please revise(insert text in)SWM Narrative(toward end)". . .both Phase 1 and Phase 2 to show that an
adequate channel exists to convey site or off-site water that transits the site to the existing Kegler's pond."
Response: The text has been updated in the Stormwater Management Narrative.
35. Ref.Attached 11/5/15 email to Mike Myers re.As-built survey of Kegler's pond.All items appear to have been
considered with WP020160001 I design,except item#1. WPO plan review comment will request a Construction
Record Drawing of'Kegler's Pond'to determine true dimensions and capacity;basin outfall structures must he
included." [11/5;9/2/15 email] WPO plan approval is required for site plan approval.
Response: The Kegler's Pond Construction Record drawing was submitted with WPO 20160011
on 3/18/16.
36.Turn off existing conditions layer.
Response: The existing conditions layer has been turned off on the Site plan sheets.
37. SP8, SP9—Recommend copy Impervious Area Summary table from SP2 to these sheets;revise table if
necessary.
Response: For clarity,the impervious area summary is only located on Sheet SP2.
38. SP9—Recommend revise Summary Note to state impervious area with phase I also includes removal of Go-
Kart track.
Response: Summary note added to SP2.
39.Please confirm whether Ex.Drainage Easement,DB 1 454/PG637 is sufficient to convey site runoff to Kegler's
pond.Existing contours in area of outfall 1 (WPO/SW6)appear to show site runoff will discharge to adjacent
property,not necessarily a defined channel,or will be confined to Ex.drainage easement."There can be no off-site
impact due to re-development of TMP 45-1 12G." [11/5;9/2/15 email-Attached]Demonstrate site runoff will reach
Kegler's pond.Acquire additional Drainage Easement if necessary.
Response: Additional easement will not be necessary for this project since there is an existing
drainage easement at DB 1119 PG 577.
Mr. Andrew Slack, GIS Specialist II
1. The applicant should contact this office with a list of(3)proposed road names for approval. This site will
require a private road name with four addressable structures located on the site. Please contact this office with any
questions.
Response: The approved street name is Harvest Moon Lane.
5 of 8
ts
ceras
es4et jl Dominion
an ` L Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
0.0:04 � Fir
434.979.8121 (p)
�'e�e ers 434.979.1681 (f)
its DominionEng.com
Mr. Alexander Morrison, P.E. Civil Engineer
ACSA
1. Construction review and approval by the ACSA will be required prior to final site plan
approval. Submit 3 copies of the final site plan,a water data sheet and a sewer data
sheet to the ACSA. Attn: Michael Vieira,PE,when available.
Response: Sewer and Water data sheets are provided with this submittal.
2. Show the existing private sanitary sewer pump station serving 3350 Berkmar Drive.
Response: The existing private sanitary sewer pump station serving 3350 Berkmar Drive has been
shown on the Final Site Plan.
3. Re-label the proposed private 8"sanitary sewer as proposed ACSA sanitary sewer.
Response: The proposed private 8"sanitary sewer line has been relabeled as an ACSA sanitary
sewer.
4. Show easements on the 8"sanitary sewer.
Response: Easements are shown on the 8"sanitary sewer line.
5. Show easement for future public sewer extension to Berkmar Drive and TMP#45-112.
Response: The easement for the future public sewer extension to Berkmar Drive and TMP#45-112
are shown on this submittal.
6. RWSA approval of the water main tap is required.Relocate the proposed tap to the 8"
ACSA water main along the frontage of 3350 Berkmar Drive.
Response: The RWSA will not allow us to tap their 24"waterline. The proposed tap has been
moved to the 8"ACSA water main along the frontage of 3350 Berkmar Drive.
7. Re-align the proposed water main through the drive isles in the parking lots,tapping the meters at the
appropriate locations.
Response: The proposed water main has been re-aligned along Berkmar Dr, through the existing
parking lots and tapping meters are shown in the appropriate locations.
8. Advise if there will be any sprinkler systems within the buildings.
Response: Building 1 will not have a sprinkler system.
9. Advise if there will be irrigation service for this development.
Response: There is no anticipated irrigation service at this time.
6 of 8
ets
e;%:ce oits
ear Dominion
an `i L Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
Vs.‘Ie 434.979.8121 (p)
4't ee 434.97
r �s9.1681 (f)
cts DominionEng.com
Ms. Megan Yaniglos, Principal Planner
1. [Comment] It is difficult to distinguish between the existing conditions and the proposed improvements on sheet
S4.Recommend that the existing conditions be grayed back for clarity.
Response: The existing conditions have been removed from the site plan sheets.
2. [32.5.2(a)] On sheet SP4 reference the approval of the buffer disturbance that was approved with SDP1996-012.
There are currently two notes that reference the exception that need to be updated.
Response: The notes have been updated with this submittal.
3. [32.5.2(c)]Provide the approximate timing for Phase 2.
Response: The anticipated timing for Phase II has been added to sheet SP2.
4. [32.5.2(1)] Will the proposed utilities have easements?If so, show the easements on the plan.
Response: Easements for the sanitary sewer, and waterline and public storm sewer have been
provided.
5. [32.5.2(m)] Show the distance to the centerline of Berkmar from the proposed ingress and egress.
Response: The distance to the centerline of Berkmar Drive from the proposed ingress and egress
has been shown on sheet SP4.
6. [32.5.2(n)] Show the dimensions of the walkways/sidewalks and screening fence.Also, indicate the proposed
paving materials for all walks,parking lots and driveways.
Response: The dimensions and paving materials for walkways/sidewalks, parking lots and
driveways are shown on sheet SP4. Screening Fence details are on Sheet SP10.
7. [32.5.2(1)] A plat and associated deeds will be required for all easements prior to final site plan approval.
Response: A plat and deed will be provided under separate cover.
8. [Recommendation] If possible,provide a reservation for dedication upon demand of the County for the future
widening of Berkmar. This reservation should be a total of 44 feet from the centerline of Berkmar. Adjustment will
need to be made to Building 4 for this reservation so that the turn lane can be accommodated,however it appears
there is room to make this adjustment and meet the required setback.
7 of 8
4,
c
ce ors
0,,J0��s Dominion
a y ,I ki Engineering 172 South Pantops Drive' Charlottesville, VA 22911
�n`o,% 1wjr 434.979.8121 (p)
4' 4er 434.979.1681
eels (f)
DominionEng.com
Response: The developer has opted to not provide the reservation for future dedication at this
time.
Mr. Robbie Gilmer, Fire Rescue
1. Fire flow test required before final approval.
Response: The fire flow test results are shown on SP1.
2. Building 3 needs to have a sprinkler system or an approved fire access turn around behind the building. A
sprinkler system or an approved travel distance from 150'to 200'and eliminate the required turn around behind the
building.
Response: Comment noted. Building 3 comment will be addressed with the Phase 2 Site Plan.
Phase 1 Final Site Plan only involves Building 1 and hardscapes.
VDOT
1. Sight/lines/distances need to be added to the site plan for proposed entrance from Berkmar Drive to help
determine whether the proposed entrance will have sight distance issues or not.
Response: Sight lines and distances and profiles are shown on sheet SP10.
We trust the above adequately addresses your comments. Please let me know if you have any questions
or require additional information.
Best Regards,
'---2,,,i,,t„...,
Dustin Greene. EIT
8 of 8