HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201700010 Staff Report 2017-03-13 $4cAL-044,,, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
l 1 iIn �Zv. Department of Community Development
__ 401 McIntire Road,North Wing
Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
frIRrnv*. 434-296-5832
ALBEMARLE COUNTY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
TENTATIVE Agenda for March 20, 2017
ALBEMARLE COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
1:00 PM — Room 241
NOTE: Plans and other items submitted for the regular review items listed below are available for viewing at the
County Office Building. If you are interested in viewing these documents, please contact the Department of
Community Development using the information listed in the letterhead.
1. Call to order
2. Establish a quorum
3. Disclosures
4. Public comment
5. Consent Agenda
6. Regular Review Items
7. Work Session
a. Form-based Code
Staff: Andrew Gast-Bray
8. Other Business
a. Albemarle High School: Renovation/metal panels
b. 684 Berkmar Circle: Rooftop wireless installation
c. Shops at Westfield: frontage planting
d. Signs: Fees, catalog
e. Next ARB Meeting: April 3, 2017
9. Adjournment
Consent Agenda
1. ARB-2017-07: LIDL Premier Circle
Applicant: Craig Kotarski
2. ARB-2017-10: Boyd Tavern Market Initial Plan
3113)1 Applicant: Justin Shimp
NOTES REGARDING PUBLIC MEETINGS
1. Each applicant is allowed to make a single presentation not exceeding 15 minutes in length.The applicant may divide the 15-minute allotment
among various presenters,but the total presentation time will not exceed 15 minutes.
2. Each member of the general public who wishes to speak on a matter shall be allowed one appearance not to exceed 3 minutes.
3. Any person aggrieved by any decision of the Architectural Review Board may demand a review of the application by the Board of Supervisors.
Such demand shall be made by filing a request therefore in writing with the clerk of the Board of Supervisors within ten calendar days of the date
of such decision.For additional information see section 30.6.8 of the Zoning Ordinance.
NOTES REGARDING ARB ACTIONS
1. Certificates of Appropriateness are valid for the same period that the corresponding site plan is valid. If there is no site plan required for the
proposed work,the Certificate of Appropriateness is valid for 3 years.Applicants requesting an extension of the period of validity must do so in
writing.The letter must be received by the Director of Planning prior to the expiration date.
'ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB -2017-10: Boyd Tavern Market
Review Type
Initial Site Plan
Parcel Identification
09400000003900
Location
At the southwest corner of the intersection of I64 and Black Cat Road
Zoned
Rural Areas (RA) and Commercial (C1)/Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
Virginia Oil Company Inc./Shimp Engineering (Justin Shimp)
Magisterial District
Scottsville
Proposal
To construct a convenience store and fuel pump canopy with associated site improvements.
Context
The surrounding area is rural in character with a mix of wooded area, single-family residential development, and some
farm buildings.
Visibility
The proposed development is expected to be visible through the wooded area when traveling eastbound on 164 and exiting
using the off -ramp to southbound Black Cat Road. Existing trees on adjacent parcels and in the 164 right-of-way are
expected to limit other views. If these trees are removed, visibility will increase dramatically.
ARB Meeting Date
March 20, 2017
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
PROJECT HISTORY
The ARB has reviewed no previous proposals for this site.
ANALYSIS
Gray highlight = means the guideline can't be reviewed at initial site plan stage, but recommendations can be provided for final
Yellow highlight = means the guideline can only be reviewed for location/configuration at the initial plan stage
Regular text = means the guideline can be reviewed at initial plan stage, can be made a condition of initial plan approval, and can be the basis for denial
REF
GUIDELINE
ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
Structure design
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the
Architectural information was not
Architectural
designated Entrance Corridors is to insure that new development within the
submitted with the Initial Site Plan
information will be
corridors reflects the traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the
application. It is possible that the
reviewed with a future
purpose of ARB review and of these Guidelines, that proposed
design of the convenience store
submittal.
development within the designated Entrance Corridors reflect elements of
could draw on examples of local
design characteristic of the significant historical landmarks, buildings, and
historic architecture, but it is
See recommendations
structures of the Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote orderly
unlikely that a fuel pump canopy
below.
and attractive development within these corridors. Applicants should note
will do so. Given the location and
that replication of historic structures is neither required nor desired.
distance from the EC, the
architectural style and details of the
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and
Albemarle area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and
store and canopy structures may not
vegetation. In order to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and
have a significant impact on the EC,
vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines require attention to
if off-site wooded area remains in
four primary factors: compatibility with significant historic sites in the area;
place. However, even with existing
the character of the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and
wooded area in place, canopy
landscaping.
illumination is expected to be
noticed from the EC.
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should
respect the traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings
in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings
in the area, as well as drawings of architectural features, which provide
important examples of this tradition are contained in Appendix A.
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for
building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic
structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new
development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the
area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of
compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which
may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate
varying tastes as well as special functional requirements.
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials,
colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the
significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to)
the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The
standard of compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms
which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County
is not the objective of these guidelines.
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of
A typical convenience store and fuel
Architectural
buildings.
pump canopy will not look like other
information will be
buildings in the area.
reviewed with a future
submittal.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be
Details that establish human scale in
Architectural
integral to the building and site design.
the convenience store and fuel pump
information will be
canopy may be difficult to detect
reviewed with a future
from the EC.
submittal.
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of
A typical convenience store and fuel
Architectural
compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor in
pump canopy will not appear
information will be
order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate
cohesive with other existing
reviewed with a future
sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a
development in the corridor.
submittal.
designated corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require
striking a careful balance between harmonizing new development with the
existing character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the
significant historic sites in the area.
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms,
shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole.
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be
The orientation of the convenience
Architectural
relieved using design detail or vegetation, or both.
store places the rear and side
information will be
elevations of the building towards
reviewed with a future
the EC. These elevations could
submittal.
include blank areas. However, if
blankness is a characteristic of the
design, it is not expected to have a
significant impact on the EC given
the distance from the street and
existing wooded area.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be
The plan shows no use of
None.
used to unify groups of buildings within a development.
architectural connecting devices and,
if used, they would not likely be
detectable from the EC.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the
It is very likely that the convenience
Architectural
requirements of the Guidelines.
store and fuel pump canopy will be
information will be
proposed as standard trademark
reviewed with a future
designs.
submittal.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly
Given the distance from the EC and
None.
reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the
orientation of the buildings, window
following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below
glass is not expected to have an
40%. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications
impact on the EC.
on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application for
final review.
Accessory structures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall
Details on accessory structures and
None at this time.
plan of development and shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with
equipment haven't been provided for
the building designs used on the site.
review at this time. It is possible that
the distance from the EC will
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance
Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a
sufficiently mitigate impacts. A
negative visual impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be
determination can be made once the
provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas,
building design and equipment
c. Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment, f. Above-
details are submitted for review.
ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire, and
similar security fencing devices.
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings
and surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of a. Walls, b.
Plantings, and c. Fencing.
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into
A stormwater pond is proposed in
None.
the natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from the
the northwest part of the developed
Entrance Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the
area. It is not expected to be visible
landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features.
from the EC.
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns)
should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan:
The note is needed on the plans.
Add the standard
"Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be
mechanical equipment
eliminated."
note to the site plan and
the architectural
drawings.
Lighting
24
Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate for display lots in
Lighting information has not been
Illumination on site shall
the Entrance Corridors. Lower light levels will apply to most other uses in
submitted for review. The intensity
not exceed 20 fc at the
the Entrance Corridors.
of illumination at the site,
particularly from the fuel pump
ground.
25
Light should have the appearance of white light with a warm soft glow;
however, a consistent appearance throughout a site or development is
canopy, is a potential concern. The
Add staggered rows of
required. Consequently, if existing lamps that emit non-white light are to
ARB has typically applied a 20 fc
mixed evergreen trees
remain, new lamps may be required to match them.
maximum to this type of proposal.
Even at that level, given the
along the western and
northwestern perimeters
28
In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance
Corridors, the individual context of the site will be taken into consideration
generally dark surroundings, the
of the proposed
on a case by case basis.
canopy illumination may appear out
of place. Adding staggered rows of
travelway, high on the
slope, and at the
29
The following note should be included on the lighting plan: "Each outdoor
luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens
mixed evergreen trees along the
north/northwest
shall be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect
western and northwestern perimeters
perimeter of the
light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent
of the proposed travelway, and at the
property, to reduce
roads. The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and
north/northwestern perimeter of the
impacts of the
property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one
property, could help mitigate
development on the EC.
half footcandle."
negative impacts on the EC.
Landscaping
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended to
Landscaping was not included in the
Landscaping will be
reflect the landscaping characteristic of many of the area's significant
Initial Site Plan.
reviewed with a future
historic sites which is characterized by large shade trees and lawns.
submittal.
Landscaping should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor and
Wooded area exists along the EC
help to integrate buildings into the existing environment of the corridor.
frontage, but it is located primarily in
the VDOT right-of-way.
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting
different types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such
common elements allow for more flexibility in the design of structures
because common landscape features will help to harmonize the appearance
of development as seen from the street upon which the Corridor is centered.
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include
the following:
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor
Street. Such trees should be at least 3 %2 inches caliper (measured 6 inches
above the ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area.
Such trees should be located at least every 35 feet on center.
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be
interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The
ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees.
They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing
pattern.
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone
wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor
street.
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and
fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and
exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
There are no interior roads, but a
Add a staggered row of
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees
travelway is proposed around the
mixed evergreen trees
should be at least 2'/z inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground)
perimeter of the development.
along the western and
and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be
Evergreen trees planted along the
northwestern perimeters
located at least every 40 feet on center.
west and northwest sides could help
of the travelway to
diminish impacts of illumination
reduce impacts of the
from the fuel pump canopy on the
development on the EC.
EC.
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
Sidewalk surrounds the proposed
None at this time.
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian ways.
building. There is no planting area
Such trees should be at least 2'h inches caliper (measured six inches above
provided adjacent to the building.
the ground) and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees
should be located at least every 25 feet on center.
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
There appears to be sufficient space
Landscaping will be
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet on
available for perimeter parking area
reviewed with a future
center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of
trees and shrubs.
submittal.
one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly
distributed throughout the interior of the parking area.
The applicant's parking calculations
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2'h inches
indicate that 21 parking spaces are
caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced;
required and 25 spaces are provided.
and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be
25 spaces require 3 interior parking
planted in planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of
lot trees. The plan includes 6 parking
the tree and shall be protected by curbing.
islands, so there is sufficient space
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's
for interior parking lot trees.
impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in
height.
A plant schedule was not included
with the Initial Site Plan.
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
There is no planting area provided
None at this time.
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long
adjacent to the convenience store.
buildings as necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The
Architectural information was not
spacing, size, and type of such trees or vegetation should be determined by
submitted with the Initial Site Plan
the length, height, and blankness of such walls.
application, so the need for planting
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other
close to the building cannot be
structures; dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru"
determined at this time.
windows; service areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches
in height.
Shrubs aren't expected to have an
im act on the EC in this case.
37
Plant species:
A plant schedule was not included
Not at this time.
a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff based upon but
with the Initial Site Plan.
not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and
Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D).
38
Plant health:
The note will be needed on the
Add the standard plant
The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All site plantings
landscape plan.
health note to the plan.
of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature
height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned
minimally and only to support the overall health of theplant."
Site Development and layout
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and
The convenience store and fuel
It is recommended that
should contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This
pump canopy are not oriented
an expert be engaged to
may be accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and
parallel to the EC street. They are
establish accurate
rolling terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and
oriented parallel to Black Cat Road.
cemetery boundaries
pedestrian ways and choosing species that reflect native forest elements;
Given the distance from the EC and
prior to grading the site.
insuring that any grading will blend into the surrounding topography
access points on Black Cat Road,
thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical,
this orientation is reasonable.
existing significant river and stream valleys which may be located on the
site and integrating these features into the design of surrounding
Sidewalks do not exist on Black Cat
development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale that does
Road.
not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor.
The northwestern part of the parcel
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor
street and to other development within the corridor should be as follows:
is mostly open, with a perimeter of
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian
wooded area, much of which is
walks should guide the layout of the site.
located off site. Approximately just
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be
under 2 acres of wooded area would
parallel to the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the
be removed for the development.
Entrance Corridor street.
c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and
A cemetery is located on the
vehicular circulation systems.
property in close proximity to
proposed grading.
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity
within the Entrance Corridor.
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys,
steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical,
then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the
provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance
apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as
to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements
from Entrance Corridor streets.
f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and
vistas on and around the site.
Site Gradin
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding
Proposed grading would raise the
None.
conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain
building and paved area 10' to 14'
through the use of smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing
above the existing grade. A retaining
terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours
wall is proposed in the western part
on the grading plan shall be rounded with a ten foot minimum radius where
of the developed area. Based on the
they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural,
location and height of the wall, it is
rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller,
not expected to be seen from the EC.
when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any
Some, but not all, of the wooded area
None.
trees or other existing features designated for preservation in the final
on site will be removed for the
Certificate of Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be
proposed development.
shown on, and coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion
and sediment control plans.
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness
should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading
activity on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion
of the development of the site.
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy
equipment within this area.
45
Fuel Pump Canopies
a
Fuel pump canopies may be required to provide customers with protection
Information on the character and
Consider reducing the
from the elements and to provide lighting levels required for dispensing
appearance of the proposed fuel
length of the canopy to
fuel. Such fuel pump canopies are functional elements of present-day
pump canopy was not included in the
reduce visual impacts.
gas/convenience stores and their character and appearance shall reflect a
Initial Site Plan submittal.
minimalist design consistent with that function.
b
Fuel pump canopies shall be the smallest size possible to offer protection
The canopy is 24' wide and 178'
from the elements. Canopies shall not exceed the sizes identified in
long on its longer side (which
Standards for Fuel Pump Canopies as outlined in Appendix B.
includes some additional length
where the canopy turns at an angle).
j
Fuel pump canopy applicants should refer to ARB Standards for Fuel Pump
Canopies. (Appendix B)
The proposed dispenser layout is not
specifically addressed in the
guidelines. If the information in the
guidelines was adapted to address
the proposed layout, the guidelines
would probably require closer
spacing of the dispensers, resulting
in a reduced canopy length. Visually,
the proposed canopy will be the
major element on site. However, the
details of its design are expected to
be difficult to detect from the EC.
The illumination from the canopy is
expected to be noticeable from the
EC. This could result in a negative
impact.
c
The size of the canopy fascia and canopy support columns shall be in
Information on the canopy fascia and
proportion to the overall size of the canopy structure. The fascia shall not
support columns was not included in
exceed 36" in total height, including any accent bands.
the Initial Site Plan submittal.
d
Canopy fascias shall not be illuminated.
e
Lighting of fuel pump canopies shall be of the lowest level that will provide
Information on illumination of the
Illumination on site shall
safe dispensing of fuel. All canopy lighting shall be flush -mounted and
canopy was not included in the
not exceed 20 fc at the
shielded, downward directed, and shall not emit light above the horizontal
Initial Site Plan submittal. The ARB
ground.
plane. All canopy lighting shall meet the .5 foot-candle spillover
has applied a 20 fc maximum to this
requirement in compliance with zoning ordinance regulations.
type of proposal. Even at that level,
Add staggered rows of
given the generally dark
mixed evergreen trees
surroundings, the canopy
along the western and
illumination may appear out of
northwestern perimeters
place. Adding staggered rows of
of the proposed
mixed evergreen trees along the
travelway, high on the
western and northwestern perimeters
slope, and at the
of the proposed travelway, and at the
north/northwest
north/northwestern perimeter of the
perimeter of the
property, to reduce
10
property, could help mitigate
impacts of the
negative impacts on the EC.
development on the EC.
f
Canopy related elements, including fuel dispensers, support columns,
The canopy related elements are not
Architectural
spandrels, planters, etc. shall be compatible with the character of the
expected to be visible from the EC.
information will be
building and site and shall not be used for advertising.
reviewed with a future
g
The architectural elements of a building should not be altered to reflect
The architectural design of the
submittal.
trademark canopy design.
convenience store was not included
in the Initial Site Plan submittal.
h
Canopy fascias shall be limited to the use of one principal color, with ARB
Color could be used to minimize the
review.
visibility of the canopy from the EC.
i
Colors, materials, forms, and detailing may be used to coordinate canopies
Information on colors, materials,
with a site, its building(s), and structures.
forms and detailing was not included
in the Initial Site Plan submittal.
10
1.100T1u/: W&Oa9OccI]U1UI040IMI Y[13M
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. Anticipated visibility of the development from the I64 EC.
2. Anticipated impact of canopy illumination on the I64 EC.
3. Extent of future ARB review required.
Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendations to the Agent for the Site Review Committee:
• Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5) and recommended conditions of initial plan approval:.
1. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval.
• Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines:
1. It is recommended that an expert be engaged to establish accurate cemetery boundaries prior to grading the site.
2. Consider reducing the length of the canopy to limit visual impacts.
• Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: None.
Regarding the final site plan submittal:
1. Architecture and landscaping will be reviewed with a future submittal. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan
approval.
2. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the site plan and the architectural drawings. "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the
Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
3. Illumination on site shall not exceed 20 fc at the ground.
4. Add staggered rows of mixed evergreen trees along the western and northwestern perimeters of the proposed travelway, high on the slope, and at
the north/northwest perimeter of the property, to reduce impacts of the development on the EC.
5. Add the standard plant health note to the plan. "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature
height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant."
11
TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawing Date/Revision Date
C1
Cover Sheet
2/6/17
C2
Existing Conditions & Demo
2/6/17
C3
Site Overview/Sight Distance Lines
2/6/17
C4
Site Plan
2/6/17
CS
I Grading & Utilities
2/6/17
12