HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB201700007 Staff Report 2017-03-13 of A i I COUNTY OF ALBEMABLEt
ItY111tiR Department of Community Development
-tett: 401 McIntire Road,North Wing
11 ffos, Charlottesville,Virginia 22902-4596
e >� : 434-296-5832,
I'
ALBEMARLE COUNTY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
TENTATIVE Agenda for March 20, 2017
ALBEMARLE COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
1:00 PM — Room 241
NOTE: Plans and other items submitted for the regular review items listed below are available for viewing,at the
County Office Building. If you are interested in viewing these documents, please contact the,Department of
Community Development using the information listed in the letterhead. '
1. Call to order
2. Establish a quorum
3. Disclosures
4. Public comment
5. Consent Agenda
6. Regular Review Items
7. Work Session
a. Form-based Code
Staff: Andrew Gast-Bray
8. Other Business
a. Albemarle High School: Renovation/metal panels
b. 684 Berkmar Circle: Rooftop wireless installation
c. Shops at Westfield: frontage planting
d. Signs: Fees, catalog
e. Next ARB Meeting: April 3, 2017
9. Adjournment
_Consent Agenda
?ivl 1. ARB-2017-07:LIDL'Premier Circle
31 ` Applicant: Craig Kotarski
12117 2. ARB-2017-10: Boyd Tavern Market Initial Plan
Applicant Justin Shimp
NOTES'REGARDING PUBLIC MEETINGS
1.: Each applicant is allowed to make a single presentation not exceeding 15 minutes in length.The applicant may divide the 15-minute allotment
among various presenters,but the total presentation time will not exceed 15 minutes, ' '
2. Each member of the general public who wishes to speak on a matter shall be-allowed one appearance not to exceed 3,minutes.
3. Any person aggrieved by any decision of the Architectural Review Board may demand a review of the application by the Board of Supervisors.
Such demand shall be made by filing a request therefore in writing with the clerk of the Board of Supervisors within den calendar days of the date.
of such decision.-For additional information see section 30.6.8 of the Zoning'.Ordinance.
NOTES;REGARDING:ARB ACTIONS
E Certificates of Appropriateness are;valid'for the same period that the corresponding site plan is valid. If there is no site plan,required for the.
proposed work,the.Certificate of Appropriateness is valid for 3'years.Applicants requesting an extension of the period of validity must do so in
writing.The letter must be received by the Director of Planning prior to the expiration date.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #/Name
ARB-2017-07: LIDL Premier Circle Initial Plan
Review Type
Initial Site Plan
Parcel Identification
061M0000000600
Location
405 Premier Circle, on the west side of Rt. 29, approximately 300' north of Westfield Road
Zoned
Commercial (C1)/Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner/Applicant
Titoa LTD/Timmons Group (Craig Kotarski)
Magisterial District
Rio
Proposal
To construct a grocery store with associated site improvements.
Context
The site of the proposed development is surrounded by a mix of commercial development, including retail,
restaurants, gas stations, banks, hotels, and motels to the north, south and east, and residential development to the
west.
Visibility
The proposed development will be readily visible from the Entrance Corridor.
ARB Meeting Date
March 201, 2017
Staff Contact
Margaret Maliszewski
PROJECT HISTORY The motel on this site predates the establishment of the Entrance Corridors. The ARB reviewed and approved a sign application
for this site in 2001.
ANALYSIS
Gray highlight = means the guideline can't be reviewed at initial site plan stage, but recommendations can be provided for final
Yellow highlight = means the guideline can only be reviewed for location/configuration at the initial plan stage
Regular text = means the guideline can be reviewed at initial plan stage, can be made a condition of initial plan approval, and can be the basis for denial
REF
GUIDELINE
ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION
Structure design
1
The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the designated
Architectural plans were not
Provide architectural
Entrance Corridors is to insure that new development within the corridors
submitted with the initial site
designs for review with
reflects the traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the purpose of
plan. However, it is anticipated
the next submittal.
ARB review and of these Guidelines, that proposed development within the
that the proposed building will
designated Entrance Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the
have a similar appearance to the
Fignificant historical landmarks, buildings, and structures of the
design proposed for the Pantops
Charlottesville and Albemarle area, and to promote orderly and attractive
location, and that the design
development within these corridors. Applicants sh0"�ote that repliSa�
will not have a strong
historic structures is neither required nor desired.
connection tot the historic
architecture of the county.
2
Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle
area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In
order to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and vegetation
characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines require attention to four primary
factors: compatibility with significant historic sites in the area; the character
of the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and landscaping.
3
New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respe
the traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings in the
Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the
area, as well as drawings of architectural features, which provide important
examples of this tradition are contained in Appendix A.
4
The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for
building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic
structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new
development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the
area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility
can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which may be
embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The
Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as
well as special functional requirements.
9
Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials,
colors and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the
significant historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to)
the buildings described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The
standard of compatibility can be met through scale, materials, and forms
which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as
traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County is
not the objective of these guidelines.
5
It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of
Buildings on sites adjacent to
Provide architectural
compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor irk
the subject parcel predate the
designs for review with
order to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate
establishment of the Entrance
the next submittal.
sensitivity to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a
Corridor. These include the 3-
designated corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require
story Royal Inn motel and a 2-
striking a careful balance between harmonizing new development with
story office building to the
existing character of the corridor and achieving compatibility with the
north, and the 2-story Nature
significant historic sites in the area.
Conservancy building to the
south. Buildings in the area that
have been reviewed and
10
Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings.
12
Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes,
scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole.
approved by the ARB include
the Pet Supplies Plus building,
the Shell station, the 7-11,
Waffle House, and buildings in
the Branchlands development.
A Springhill Town Place Suites
hotel is under review across Rt.
29, behind the Flaming Wok
building. The proposed grocery
store is expected to have an
appearance very different from
the surrounding buildings.
11
The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be
Some modifications to LIDL's
integral to the building and site design.
standard design were made in
an attempt to deal with scale
13
Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be
relieved using design detail or vegetation, or both.
and blankness in the building
design at the Panto s location.
14
Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be used
A single building with no
to unify groups of buildings within a development.
connecting devices is proposed.
15
Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the
It is anticipated that a standard
requirements of the Guidelines.
company design, or a standard
design with minimal revisions,
will be proposed.
16
Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly
Glass specs have not yet been
Not at this time.
reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following
provided.
criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 4001o. Visible
light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed
indow glass should be submitted with the application for final review.
Accessory structures and equipment
17
Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall plan
A loading area is provided at
Provide information
of development Ind shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with the
the back of the building, so this
showing that rooftop
building designs used on the site.
function will be mostly
screened from the EC. A
equipment will not be
visible from the EC.
18
The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance
Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a
dumpster is provided off the
negative visual impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be
back corner of the building. The
Show how the cart corral
provided to eliminate visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse
gates face the EC, but the
will be coordinated with
areas, d. Storage areas, e. Mechanical equipment,
location is expected to be
the architectural design of
f. Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed wire, razor wire,
sufficiently distant from the EC
the building.
and similar security fencing devices.
with intervening landscaping
located to reduce noticeability,
19
Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and
surrounding natural vegetation and may consist of. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and
such that negative impacts will
c. Fencing.
be reduced.
A cart corral is proposed at the
front corner of the building,
readily visible from the EC.
The Pantops LIDL proposal
included rooftop equipment, so
it is likely that this location
will, as well. The site sits
higher than the street, so it
should be easier to screen
rooftop equipment at this site.
Additional information is
needed to confirm that the
equipment will not be visible.
20
Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into the
An underground stormwater
None.
natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from the
facility is proposed.
Entrance Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the
landscape. They should not have the appearance of engineered features.
44
Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns)
should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible.
21
The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan:
The note is needed on the plan.
Add the standard
"Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be
mechanical equipment
eliminated."
note to both the site and
architectural plans.
Lighting
22
Light should be contained on the site and not spill over onto adjacent
There is no excessive spillover.
None.
properties or streets;
23
Light should be shielded, recessed or flush -mounted to eliminate glare. All
All proposed fixtures are full
None.
fixtures with lamps emitting 30001umens or more must be full cutoff fixtures.
cutoff fixtures.
24
Light levels exceeding 30 footcandles are not appropriate for display lots iq
Maximum illumination reaches
None.
the Entrance Corridors. Lower light levels will apply to most other uses in the
15.3 fc.
Entrance Corridors.
25
Light should have the appearance of white light with a warm soft glow;
All fixtures are proposed with
None.
however, a consistent appearance throughout a site or development is
LED lamps.
required. Consequently, if existing lamps that emit non -white light are to
remain, new lamps may be required to match them.
26
Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors for free-standing
The luminaire schedule does
Revise the luminaire
pole mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors.
not clearly identify fixture and
schedule to clearly
pole color.
identify proposed fixture
and pole colors. Provide a
consistent color
throughout the
development. Dark
brown, dark bronze, or
black are appropriate
colors.
.27
The height and scale of freestanding, pole -mounted light fixtures should be
Pole fixtures are to be mounted
None.
compatible with the height and scale of the buildings and the sites they are
at 20'; wall fixtures, at 10'.
illuminating, and with the use of the site. Typically, the height of
freestanding pole -mounted light fixtures in the Entrance Corridors should not
exceed 20 feet, including the base. Fixtures that exceed 20 feet in height will
typically require additional screening to achieve an appropriate appearance
from the Entrance Corridor.
28
In determining the appropriateness of lighting fixtures for the Entrance
Because the site sits at a higher
Locate all proposed light
Corridors, the individual context of the site will be taken into consideration
elevation than the EC street, it
fixtures on site.
on a case by case basis.
will be possible to look up into
the pole fixtures from the street,
Consider shifting tree
which could cause glare.
locations to help reduce
Careful placement of trees
glare from parking lot
could help reduce the glare.
pole light fixtures.
Two pole fixtures are shown
Coordinate the use of the
off -site.
W2 fixture throughout the
site plan.
A cut sheet has been provided
for a W2 fixture, but the W2
fixture is not included in the
schedule or photometric plan.
29
The following note should be included on the lighting plan: "Each outdoor
The note is missing from the
Add the standard lighting
luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall
plan.
note to the plan.
be a full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light
away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The
spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in
residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half
footcandle."
Landscaping
7
The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended to
Large trees are shown along the
Adjust planting area
reflect the landscaping characteristic of many of the area's significant historic
EC frontage, but planting size is
along the EC to avoid tree
sites which is characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping
shown as 2'/2" caliper.
and utility conflicts.
should promote visual order within the Entrance Corridor and help to
Ornamentals are interspersed.
integrate buildings into the existing environment of the corridor.
The trees are located
approximately 10' from an
Increase EC street tree
planting size to 3 1/2"
8
Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting
different types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Sucli
overhead power line and 10-15'
caliper.
common elements allow for more flexibility in the design of structures
from a Vepco easement. The
because common landscape features will help to harmonize the appearance of
large trees will grow into the
development as seen from the street upon which the Corridor is centered.
overhead lines.
32
Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include
the following:
a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor Street.
Such trees should be at least 3'/2 inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the
ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees
should be located at least every 35 feet on center.
b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be
interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The
ornamental trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They
may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern.
c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone
wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor
street.
d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and
fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and
exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements.
33
Landscaping along interior roads:
Trees are provided along
None.
a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees
Premier Circle as required.
should be at least 2'/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground)
and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be
located at least every 40 feet on center.
34
Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways:
Sidewalks are provided along
Add planting areas and
a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian ways.
Rt. 29 and Premier Circle,
trees along the north
Such trees should be at least 2%2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the
where shade trees are also
building elevation.
ground) and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should 1j
proposed. Sidewalks are
located at least every 25 feet on center.
provided along the north and
east building elevations, but no
36
Landscaping of buildings and other structures:
a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long
planting area is provided there.
buildings as necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The spacing,
The north elevation of this
size, and type of such trees or vegetation should be determined by the length,
building is expected to be
height, and blankness of such walls.
clearly visible. Trees along the
b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures;
elevation could help reduce
dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service
impacts. A planting island with
areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height.
trees is proposed in the paved
area east of the building.
35
Landscaping of parking areas:
Interior and perimeter parking
Increase shrub planting
a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet on
trees are provided as required.
sizes to 24" for all shrubs
center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of
Shrubs are provided along the
at parking lot perimeters.
one tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly
parking row that fronts the EC,
Add shrubs along the
distributed throughout the interior of the parking area.
but planting sizes are not all
parking rows located
b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2'/z inches
24". No shrubs are proposed
along Premier Circle.
caliper (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced; and
along the parking rows located
should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be planted in
along Premier Circle, but the
planters or medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and
orientation of these rows makes
shall be protected by curbing.
them very visible from the EC,
c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's
and shrubs would help limit
impact on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24" in height.
impacts.
37
Plant species: a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff
The Distylium is not a native
None.
based upon but not limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended
plant, but only four are
Species List and Native Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D).
proposed.
38
Plant health: The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All site
The note appears on Sheet L 1.1.
Revise plant quantities
plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at,
and increase variety so
mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall J2&
202 Hoogendorn Japanese holly
that no single tree or
pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant."
are proposed throughout the
shrub species exceeds
site. This quantity should be
25% of the total
reduced and the variety of
proposed.
shrubs expanded to help ensure
the health of the landscape.
Site Development and layout
6
Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and
A considerable amount of
Revise the plan to orient
should contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This may
paved parking and travelways
the building parallel to
be accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling
are proposed between the
the Entrance Corridor.
terrain typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and pedestrian
building and the EC. No
ways and choosing species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that
parking is relegated behind the
Revise the plan to reduce
any grading will blend into the surrounding topography thereby creating a
building.
parking area located
continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant
between the building and
river and stream valleys which may be located on the site and integrating
The building is not oriented
the EC.
these features into the design of surrounding development; and limiting the
parallel to the EC. Other
building mass and height to a scale that does not overpower the natural
buildings in the area are parallel
settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor.
or nearly parallel.
39
The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor
street and to other development within the corridor should be as follows:
Sidewalk exists along Rt. 29
a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian
and Premier Circle. The
walks should guide the layout of the site.
sidewalk would be extended
b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be
into the parking area.
parallel to the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the
Entrance Corridor street.
The site is already developed
c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and
with a motel, travelways and
vehicular circulation systems.
parking areas. There are no
d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity
existing open spaces, but the
within the Entrance Corridor.
site does contain some mature
e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys,
trees. No views are expected to
steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical,
be impacted by the proposed
then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the
development.
provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance
apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to
maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from
Entrance Corridor streets.
f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and
vistas on and around the site.
Site Grading
40
Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding
A berm approximately 10' high
Revise the plan to step
conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain
exists along the EC frontage.
the retaining wall where
through the use of smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing
With this proposal, the berm
it is taller than 6'. Provide
terrain. Steep cut or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours
would be partly flattened and
planting along the wall
on the grading plan shall be roun e with�oot rmmmum radius where they
lowered from the north end. A
and the terraces.
meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than
retaining wall is proposed along
engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when
the south/west side of the
necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape.
property, turning the corner to
continue along the back of the
building. The wall reaches 8'
tall. It is not stepped, though the
8' height is located along the
front parking lot. Perimeter
parking lot trees are proposed at
the top of the wall.
41
No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any trees
An existing tree line is shown
None.
or other existing features designated for preservation in the final Certificate of
along the back of the property.
Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and
Grading is proposed into most
coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment
of this wooded area. It is
control plans.
anticipated that all on -site trees
will be removed. A staggered
42
Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness
should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading
row of trees and shrubs is
activity on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion of
proposed along the western
the development of the site.
property line.
43
Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy
equipment within this area.
1.100TIuMW&Oa;3DWOUTIUIBiel 17.111[13M
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. Building orientation
2. Distribution/location of parking areas
3. Frontage planting and utilities
4. Retaining walls, terracing, planting
5. The building design
Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendations to the Agent for the Site Review Committee:
• Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5) and Initial Site Plan approval:
The Initial Site Plan should not be approved until the following issues are resolved to the satisfaction of the ARB.
1. Adjust planting area along the EC to avoid tree and utility conflicts.
2. Add planting area and trees along the north building elevation.
3. Revise the plan to orient the building parallel to the Entrance Corridor.
4. Revise the plan to reduce parking area located between the building and the EC.
5. Revise the plan to step the retaining wall where it is taller than 6'. Provide planting along the wall and the terraces.
• Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines:
None.
• Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit:
1. Revise the plan to show tree lines coordinated with proposed grading.
Regarding the Final Site Plan:
A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. The applicant shall submit for ARB review a revised plan
addressing the following issues and all final site plan checklist requirements:
1. Provide information showing that rooftop equipment will not be visible from the EC.
2. Show how the cart corral will be coordinated with the architectural design of the building.
3. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to both the site and architectural plans. "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the
Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
4. Revise the luminaire schedule to clearly identify proposed fixture and pole colors. A consistent color throughout the development is
recommended. Dark brown, dark bronze, or black are appropriate colors.
5. Locate all proposed light fixtures on site.
6. Consider shifting tree locations to help reduce glare from parking lot pole light fixtures.
7. Coordinate the use of the W2 fixture throughout the site plan.
8. Add the standard lighting note to the plan. "Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3,000 or more initial lumens shall be a
full cutoff luminaire and shall be arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining residential districts and away from adjacent roads.
10
The spillover of lighting from luminaires onto public roads and property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one half
footcandle."
9. Adjust planting area along the EC to avoid tree and utility conflicts.
10. Add planting area and trees along the north building elevation.
11. Increase shrub planting sizes to 24" for all shrubs at parking lot perimeters. Add shrubs along the parking rows located along Premier Circle.
12. Revise plant quantities and increase variety so that no single tree or shrubs species exceeds 25% of the total proposed.
13. Revise the plan to orient the building parallel to the Entrance Corridor.
14. Revise the plan to reduce parking area located between the building and the EC.
15. Revise the plan to step the retaining wall where it is taller than 6'. Provide planting along the wall and the terraces.
11
0M:3 0 W.1
This report is based on the following submittal items:
Sheet #
Drawing Name
Drawin Date/Revision Date
C0.0
Cover
2/6/2017
C 1.0
Notes and Details
2/6/2417
C1.1
Notes and Details
2/6/2017
C1.2
Notes and Details
2/6/2017
C2.0
Existing conditions and Demolition Plan
2/6/2417
C3.0
E&SC Notes & Details
2/6/2417
C3.1
E&SC Notes & Details
2/6/2017
C3.2
E&SC Plan Phase 1
2/6/2017
C3.3
E&SC Plan Phase 2
2/6/2417
C4.0
Overall Plan
2/6/2017
C4.1
Layout & Utilities Plan
2/6/2017
C5.0
Grading and Drainage Plan
2/6/2417
C5.1
Grading Shot Spots Plan
2/6/2017
C6.0
Stormwater Summary Plan
2/6/2017
C6.1
Stormwater Management Plan
2/6/2017
C7.0
Profiles
2/6/2017
C7.1
Profiles
2/6/2017
E 1.0
Photometric Plan
2/6/2017
E2.0
Lighting Cut sheets
2/6/2017
L1.0
Landscape Plan
2/6/2017
L1.1
Landsca e Notes & Details
2/6/2017
12