HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-02-13
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FIN A L
FEBRUARY 13, 2008
LANE AUDITORIUM
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
2:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order.
2. Discussion: Hollymead Town Center Area A - requirement that all landowners in planned district consent to
rezoning.
Work Sessions:
3. 2:40 - 3:30 p.m. - Economic Development Policy.
4. 3:45 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. - Preliminary Local Government Budget Overview.
5. 5:15 p.m. - Recess.
6:00 P.M.
LANE AUDITORIUM
6. Call to Order.
7. Pledge of Allegiance.
8. Moment of Silence.
9. From the Board: Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
10. From the Public: Matters Not Listed for Public Hearing on the Agenda.
11. Consent Agenda (on next sheet).
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
12. To consider granting an easement to Hurt Investment Company across property owned by the County known as
Peyton Drive located on Tax Map 61W, immediately south of Tax Map Parcel 61W-03-6A1. This easement is
necessary for the construction and maintenance of sanitary sewer lines by Hurt Investment Company on its
property at TMP 61W-03-6A1.
13. PROJECT: SP-2007-047. Graceworks Expansion (Siqns #1&56). PROPOSED: Amend SP 2001-24 to expand
after school care from 2-days/week to 4-days/week; increase enrollment (max 10 per day); on three parcels with
total of 58.469 acres. LOCATION: 1040 Ownesville Road (Route 678), west of Andrew Lane. TAX MAP/PARCEL:
58-82; TMP: 58-76B; TMP: 58-77. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Samuel Miller.
14. PROJECT: SP-2007-050. Carters Mountain (ATC) - Verizon Tier III PWSF (Sians #75&80). PROPOSED: Co-
location of a personal wireless service facility on an existing tower. LOCATION: Carters Mountain Trail
approximately 1 mile south of the intersection with Thomas Jefferson Parkway (State Route 53). TAX
MAP/PARCEL: 91-28. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Scottsville.
15. PROJECT: SP-2007 -051. Peacock (Weber Property) - Verizon Wireless PSWF (Siqn #82). PROPOSED:
Installation of a personal wireless facility with a 100-foot tall treetop monopole tower. LOCATION: On Dry Bridge
Road (Rt 708) between I 64 and Dick Woods Road (Rt 637). TAX MAP/PARCEL: 07300-00-00-031 DO, contains
10.31 acres. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Samuel Miller.
16. From the Board: Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
17. Adjourn to February 20,2008,1:00 p.m.
CONSENT AGENDA
FOR APPROVAL:
11.1 PROJECT: ZMA-2007-007. McCauley Crossina (formerlY Mermac Crossinq) (Siqn #66). (Defer to April 9,
2008)
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
TENTATIVE
FEBRUARY 13, 2008
LANE AUDITORIUM
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
2:30 P.M.
1 . Call to Order.
2. Discussion: Hollymead Town Center Area A - requirement that all landowners in planned district consent to
rezoning.
Work Sessions:
3. 2:40 - 3:30 p.m. - Economic Development Policy.
4. 3:45 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. - Preliminary Local Government Budget Overview.
5. 5:15 p.m. - Recess.
6:00 P.M.
LANE AUDITORIUM
6. Call to Order.
7. Pledge of Allegiance.
8. Moment of Silence.
9. From the Board: Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
10. From the Public: Matters Not Listed for Public Hearing on the Agenda.
11. Consent Agenda (on next sheet).
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
12. To consider granting an easement to Hurt Investment Company across property owned by the County known as
Peyton Drive located on Tax Map 61W, immediately south of Tax Map Parcel 61W-03-6A1. This easement is
necessary for the construction and maintenance of sanitary sewer lines by Hurt Investment Company on its
property at TMP 61W-03-6A1.
13. PROJECT: SP-2007-047. Graceworks Expansion (Siqns #1&56). PROPOSED: Amend SP 2001-24 to expand
after school care from 2-days/week to 4-days/week; increase enrollment (max 10 per day); on three parcels with
total of 58.469 acres. LOCATION: 1040 Ownesville Road (Route 678), west of Andrew Lane. TAX MAP/PARCEL:
58-82; TMP: 58-76B; TMP: 58-77. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Samuel Miller.
14. PROJECT: SP-2007-050. Carters Mountain (ATC) - Verizon Tier III PWSF (Siqns #75&80). PROPOSED: Co-
location of a personal wireless service facility on an existing tower. LOCATION: Carters Mountain Trail
approximately 1 mile south of the intersection with Thomas Jefferson Parkway (State Route 53). TAX
MAP/PARCEL: 91-28. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Scottsville.
15. PROJECT: SP-2007-051. Peacock (Weber Property) - Verizon Wireless PSWF (Siqn #82). PROPOSED:
Installation of a personal wireless facility with a 100-foot tall treetop monopole tower. LOCATION: On Dry Bridge
Road (Rt 708) between 164 and Dick Woods Road (Rt 637). TAX MAP/PARCEL: 07300-00-00-031 DO, contains
10.31 acres. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Samuel Miller.
16. From the Board: Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
17. Adjourn to February 20,2008, 1 :00 p.m.
FOR APPROVAL:
11.1 PROJECT: ZMA-2007-007. McCaule
2008)
CONSENT AGENDA
ACTIONS
Board of Supervisors Meeting of February 13, 2008
February 14, 2008
AGENDA ITEM/ACTION ASSIGNMENT
1. Call to Order.
. Meeting was called to order at 2:30 p.m., by the
Chairman, Mr. Boyd. All BOS members were
present. Also present were Bob Tucker, Larry
Davis, Wayne Cilimberq and MeaQan Hoy.
2. Discussion: Hollymead Town Center Area A-
requirement that all landowners in planned district
consent to rezoning.
. Held.
3. Work Session: Economic Development Policy. Susan Stimart: Proceed as directed.
. HELD. Clerk: Schedule on future agenda when
. Board DIRECTED staff to bring back additional ready to come back.
information.
4. Work Session: Preliminary Local Government
Budget Overview.
. HELD.
5. Recess.
. At 5:28 p.m., the Board went into closed meeting
to consult with legal counsel and staff regarding
specific matters requiring legal advice relating to
an inter-jurisdictional agreement, and to consult
with legal counsel and staff regarding specific
matters requiring legal advice relating to the
negotiation of an agreement relating to public
safety services.
6. Call to Order.
. Meeting was called back to order at 6:05 p.m., by
the Chairman, Mr. Bovd.
9. From the Board: Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
Ann Mallek:
. She will be bringing back more information on the
burning of trees and construction debris in the
growth area.
Dennis Rooker:
. Discussed the need for an amendment to the Clerk: Schedule on future agenda.
Water Protection Ordinance to modify how
stream buffers can be crossed by roads and
driveways.
Sally Thomas:
. There is a good applicant pool of ACE
applications for the coming year.
. Updated the Board on a trip she and Ms. Mallek
took to Richmond to meet with the High Growth
Coalition to discuss SB 768.
Ken Boyd:
. Received a letter from IMPACT inviting the Board
to attend their March 10,2008 meeting. Board
members discussed and will decide at a later
date who will attend.
10. From the Public: Matters not Listed on the Agenda.
. Susan Bremer, Tom Twomey, and Gene Rader
of IMPACT addressed the Board.
. Morgan Butler, Southern Environmental Law
Center, thanked the Board for adopting the Cool
Counties Resolution. He provided a report to the
Board on the link between climate change and
our land use, and transportation patterns.
. Jeff Werner, Piedmont Environmental Council,
spoke about the importance of the Advanced
Mills Historic District.
11.1 ZMA-2007-007. McCauley Crossinq (formerly Clerk: Re-advertise public hearing for April
Mermac Crossinq) (Siqn #66). (Defer to April 9, ~
2008).
. At the applicant's request, DEFFERRED ZMA-
2007-007, by a vote of 6:0, to April 9, 2008.
12. Public Hearinq: To consider granting an easement County Attorney's office: Provide Clerk with
to Hurt Investment Company. copy of fully executed document. (Attachment
. APPROVED, by a vote of 6:0, the proposed 1 )
easement and AUTHORIZED the County
Executive to sign the deed of easement on behalf
of the County.
13. PROJECT: SP-2007-047. Graceworks Expansion Clerk: Set out conditions of approval.
(Siqns #1&56). (Attachment 2)
. APPROVED SP-2007-047, by a vote of 6:0, subject
to the six conditions recommended and modified at
the Board Meeting.
14. PROJECT: SP-2007-050. Carters Mountain (ATC) - Clerk: Set out conditions of approval.
Verizon Tier III PWSF (Siqns #75&80). (Attachment 2)
. APPROVED SP-2007-050, by a vote of 5:1
(Rooker), subject to the three recommended
conditions.
. APPROVED, by a vote of 5: 1 (Rooker)
Subsection 5.1.40(C) (3): Modification of the
flush-mounting requirements to allow the
installation of a full sectored antenna array.
. APPROVED, by a vote of 6:0, Subsection
5.1.40(c) (4&5): Modification of the requirements
for a tree conservation plan, as no additional land
disturbance is being proposed.
. APPROVED, by a vote of 4:2 (Rooker, Thomas)
Subsection 5.1.40(C) (3): Modification of the
requirement to paint the antennas to match the
existinq structure.
15. PROJECT: SP-2007-051. Peacock (Weber Clerk: Set out conditions of approval.
Property) - Verizon Wireless PSWF (Siqn #82). (Attachment 2)
. APPROVED SP-2007-050, by a vote of 6:0,
subject to the two conditions recommended and
modified at the Board Meeting.
16. From the Board: Matters Not Listed on the Agenda.
Dennis Rooker:
. The Board received a memo from Butch Davies
regarding the status of transportation funding.
The funding in our area will be further curtailed.
17. Adjourn to February 20, 2008, 1 :00 p.m.
. The meeting was adiourned at 8:25 p.m.
ewj/mrh
Attachment 1 - Deed of Easement - Hurt Property
Attachment 2 - Conditions of Approval - Planning Items
2
Attachment 1
Tax Map 61W (Peyton Drive right-of-way)
This deed is exempt from taxation under Virginia Code SS 58.1-811 (A)(3) and 58.1-811 (C)(4).
DEED OF EASEMENT
THIS DEED OF EASEMENT, is made and entered into on this day of
2008, by and between the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the
Commonwealth of Virginia, Grantor, hereinafter referred to as the "County," and the HURT INVESTMENT
COMPANY, a Virginia corporation, Grantee, whose address is 195 Riverbend Drive, Charlottesville,
Virginia, 22911, hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee."
WITNESSETH:
That for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand paid, receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, the County does hereby GRANT and CONVEY with SPECIAL WARRANTY to
the Grantee, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, a sewer line lateral easement and right-
of-way (hereinafter, the "Easement") to construct, install, maintain, repair, replace and extend a sewer line
lateral consisting of pipes and appurtenances thereto, over, under and across the real property of the
County known as Peyton Drive in Albemarle County, Virginia, and more particularly described as follows:
A sewer line lateral easement in the public right-of-way known as Peyton Drive, located
off of Greenbrier Drive in Albemarle County, Virginia, as shown on the plat prepared by
Dominion Development Resources, LLC, entitled "Plat Showing New 20' Private Lateral
Easement In The Closed Right-Of-Way Of Peyton Drive, Albemarle County, Virginia",
dated September 4,2007, (the "Plat"), identified as "New 20' Private Lateral Easement."
Reference is made to the Plat, a copy of which is attached hereto to be recorded herewith, for the
exact location and dimensions of the sewer line lateral easement hereby granted and the property over
which the Easement crosses.
This Easement shall be subject to the following:
1. Location of Improvements. The Grantee shall construct, install, maintain, repair, replace
and extend improvements (hereinafter, the "Improvements") only within the Easement. The
Improvements shall be underground.
2. Riqht to Enter: Inqress and Eqress. The Grantee shall have the right to enter upon the
Easement for the purpose of installing, constructing, maintaining, repairing, replacing and extending the
Improvements within the Easement. The Grantee also shall have the right of ingress and egress thereto
as reasonably necessary to construct, install, maintain, repair, replace and extend the Improvements. If
the Grantee is unable to reasonably exercise the right of ingress and egress over the Peyton Drive right-
of-way, the Grantee shall have the right of ingress and egress over the property of the County, if any,
adjacent to the right-of-way.
3. Excavation and Restoration. Whenever it is necessary to excavate earth within the
Easement, the Grantee shall backfill the excavation in a timely, proper and workmanlike manner so as to
restore the surface conditions to the same condition as they were prior to excavation, including the
restoration of all paved surfaces that were damaged or disturbed as part of the excavation.
4. Veaetation and Obstructions. The Grantee may cut any trees, brush and shrubbery,
remove obstructions, and take other similar action reasonably necessary to provide economical and safe
installation, operation and maintenance of the Improvements. The Grantee shall replace or reimburse the
County for the cost of replacing or repairing any County-owned trees, brush, shrubbery or obstructions
that are removed or otherwise damaged in the installation, operation and maintenance of the
Improvements.
3
5. Ownership of Improvements. The Improvements shall be the property of the Grantee.
6. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The Grantee shall at all times indemnify and save
harmless the Grantor, its employees, agents, officers, assigns, and successors in interest from any claim
whatsoever arising from Grantee's exercise of rights or privileges stated herein.
7. Obliqations of the Grantee if and when Peyton Drive is Proposed for Acceptance or is
Accepted into the State-Maintained or Other Publicly-Maintained Street System. If and when the
segment of Peyton Drive in which the Easement lies is proposed for acceptance or is accepted into the
state-maintained or other publicly-maintained system of highways, the Grantee shall comply with the
following:
a. Permits. The Grantee shall obtain all permits required by the Virginia
Department of Transportation (hereinafter, "VDOT") or such other public entity that becomes responsible
for the maintenance of Peyton Drive (hereinafter, "such other public entity") to authorize the
Improvements to exist or remain within the Peyton Drive right-of-way (hereinafter, the "Permits") and shall
comply with all applicable requirements of VDOT or such other public entity.
b. Acts Required of Grantee to Assure Acceptance of Peyton Drive into State-
Maintained or Publicly-Maintained System. Until the Grantee quitclaims its interest in the Easement to
VDOT, such other public entity, or the County as required in conjunction with the acceptance of Peyton
Drive into the state-maintained or other publicly-maintained system, the Grantee, at its sole expense,
shall, promptly alter, change, adjust, relocate or remove the Improvements from the Peyton Drive right-of-
way if VDOT or such other public entity determines that such alteration, change, adjustment, relocation or
removal is required in order for VDOT or such other public entity to accept Peyton Drive into the system.
Neither the County, VDOT, nor such other public entity shall be responsible or liable to the Grantee or its
successors or assigns for any costs associated with such alteration, change, adjustment, relocation or
removal of the then-existing Improvements. In addition, neither the County, VDOT, nor such other public
entity shall be obligated to compensate or reimburse the Grantee or its successors or assigns for any
increased or decreased cost or value associated with either the Improvements or Peyton Drive resulting
from such alteration, change, adjustment, relocation or removal.
c. Continuina Obliaations of Grantee to the County. After VDOT or such other
public entity has issued the required Permits, the Grantee shall be subject to the following conditions,
notwithstanding any quitclaim of its interests to VDOT or such other public entity, and these conditions
shall be continuing obligations of the Grantee:
1. The Grantee, to the extent authorized by law, shall at all times indemnify
and save harmless the County, its employees, agents, officers, assigns, and successors in interest from
any claim whatsoever arising from the Grantee's exercise of rights or privileges stated herein.
2. In the event that the County or such other public entity becomes
responsible for the maintenance of Peyton Drive and the County or such other public entity requires, for
its purposes, that the Grantee alter, change, adjust, or relocate the Improvements, across or under
Peyton Drive, the cost to alter, change, adjust, or relocate the Improvements shall be the sole
responsibility of the Grantee. Neither the County nor such other public entity shall be responsible or liable
to the Grantee or its successors or assigns for any costs associated with altering, changing, adjusting or
relocating the then-existing Improvements as may be required herein. In addition, neither the County nor
such other public entity shall be obligated to compensate or reimburse the Grantee or its successors or
assigns for any increased or decreased cost or value associated with either the Improvements resulting
from such alteration, change, adjustment or relocation.
8. Covenants Runninq with the Land. The terms and conditions set forth herein shall be
covenants running with the land.
The County, acting by and through its County Executive, duly authorized by action of the
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on February 13, 2008, does hereby convey the interest in real
estate made by this deed.
4
By its acceptance and recordation of this Deed of Easement, the Grantee acknowledges that it,
its successors and assigns, shall be bound by the terms herein.
WITNESS the following signatures.
GRANTOR:
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
By:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
GRANTEE:
HURT INVESTMENT COMPANY
By:
Name:
Title:
5
Attachment 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLANNING ITEMS
PROJECT: SP-2007-047. Graceworks Expansion (Siqns #1&56).
1. A maximum of fourteen (14) children shall be allowed on the site at any time;
2. A minimum of two (2) adults shall supervise the children at all times;
3. The children shall be transported to and from the property as a group. The pick up and drop off
of individual children shall not be permitted except for medical, family and weather-related
emergencies;
4. The days of operation shall be limited to four (4) days per week, Monday through Thursday, and
the hours of operation shall be limited to 2:30 P.M. to 5:30 P.M. on the days of operation;
5. Expansion of the facilities for the private school shall require an amendment to this special use
permit; and
6. Within thirty (30) days after the date of approval of Special Use Permit 2007-00047, the applicant
shall submit a schematic concept plan of the property (the "Plan") in a form acceptable to the
Director of Planning that shows the existing and proposed locations of the improvements and
activity areas of the school. The improvements, scale and location of the improvements, and
activity areas authorized by Special Use Permit 2007-00047 shall be in general accord with the
Plan. However, the Zoning Administrator may approve revisions to the Plan to allow compliance
with the Zoning Ordinance.
PROJECT: SP-2007-050. Carters Mountain (ATC) - Verizon Tier III PWSF (siqns #75&80).
1 . All work shall be done in general accord with what is described in the applicant's request and site
construction plans, entitled "Carters Mountain Crown Orchard property, with a final zoning
drawing submittal date of 09/17/2007;
2. Additional antennae installation on this tower will require a special use permit; and
3. The facility will have only one (1) outdoor light fixture (that complies with the County's lighting
requirements) attached to the proposed shelter to be used by Verizon's technical operations staff
only when night-time maintenance is necessary.
PROJECT: SP-2007-051. Peacock (Weber Property) - Verizon Wireless PSWF (Siqn #82).
1. The tower height shall not exceed ten (10) feet AMSL more than the AMSL height of the
reference tree; and
2. The PWSF be installed as shown on plans approved by County staff, including equipment
camouflage in a small farm appropriate building.
6
c c c
en mOl en en
mOl
I\) < 0> I\) < 0> mOl OJ 01
c.o III 01 01 III 01 01 I\) < 0> ;;;:~
::J OJ 00 c.o ::JOJ ~ c.o III 01
C/) 0 .". C/) 0 ::J OJ ,.....--1
C" --I C" --I C/) 0 III
III III C" OJ.....
cO - co
cO co CD
!2. i 1\.).....
I l/O
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I I
I 101 I 101
I I~ OJ I I~
I I~ c I I~ OJ
0 0'
^ 0
I I; ..... I I; ^
......
I I~ I I~
() I () I "1J
c I c I a
., I ., I
., ., "'C
CD I CD I 0
::J ::J en
r-+ I r-+ I CD
() I () I a.
0 0 -
a. I a. I r
CD I CD I 0
0 I 0 I 0
-t, I -t, I "
0 0 ::J
CD 1 CD I co
< I < I en
CD I CD I 0
0 0 .
I I I 0
"'C I 0> "'C
I ..... I -t,
3 -...j 3
I w -I
CD I I en CD I
.....
::J L 0 ::J 3
I <<!
r-+ I r-+ 0-
- -
en I r CD
:T I 0 ~
0 I 0
~. I " 0
I 0
I ::J
::J I co a.
co I
I OJ
en () I en () < () I
r-+ 0 0 0 en 0> 0
., ::l ::l o~ a. ::l :cO>
::l . ::l <<! - 0.....
c CD CD w ::l 1[-...j
('") o ~ 0> 0 CD
.., o~..... .., ..,
r-+ CJ o!!l.OO -t, CJ 0
C ,-,0 OJ
~ <<!;;;: -I ~ ~
.,
CD co -.
en 3
z 0-
CD
0 ~ .....
.....
~
~ 0 CJ]
0
en a.
0 OJ
.
-I <
-. a.
3
0-
CD
~ OJ OJ
0 0' (5
0 n 0
^ ^
a. N N
OJ
< en 0>
a. .....0>
00
-<!OJ
0;;;:
01\.)
o~
'-' .".
~ $: ~
CD CD
en CD CD CD
~ ~ ~ CD
::l ::l ~
CD co co ::l
..... co
. en en
II .-+ I .-+ en
00 en 0> .-+ ~
q en 0> .....0>
6'0> 00 -...j
<<!~ -<!OJ OJ
c.n 01 c.n 01 0;;;: c..., 01 ~
W <D O~ tv <0 o~ '.oJ <.0 I\.)
I\.) <D 000 N to ,g~ i'..) <D
o~
'-' 01
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mark Graham, Director of Community Development
Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
FROM:
Greg Kamptner, Deputy County Attorney
Amelia McCulley, Director of the Division of Zoning and Current Development
Elaine Echols, Principal Planner
DATE:
February 4, 2008
RE:
Hollymead Town Center Area C: requirement that all owners in a planned district consent to
the rezoning
This memorandum explains the analysis the Department of Community Development and the County
Attorney's Office conducted to determine whether all owners within HTC-C must consent to the proposed
rezonmg.
1. State law and the County Zonin!! Ordinance require that the owners of the property which is the
subiect of the rezonin!! si!!n the application
Virginia Code S 15.2-2286(A)(7) provides in part that a zoning map amendment ("rezoning") may be
initiated:
(iii) by petition of the owner, contract purchaser with the owner's written consent, or the
owner's agent therefor, of the property which is the subject of the proposed zoning map
amendment, addressed to the governing body or the local planning commission, . . . (italics
added)
Albemarle County Code ~ 18-33.2.1 authorizes an owner to initiate a rezoning as follows:
By the filing with the board of supervisors of a petition of any owner or owners of land
proposed to be rezoned, which petition shall be addressed to the board of supervisors and shall
be on a standard form and accompanied by a fee as set forth in section 35.0. (Amended 5-5-82)
The language in Albemarle County Code S 18-33.2.1 is slightly different from the language in Virginia
Code S 15.2-2286(A)(7) and its use of the phrase "any owner" could, arguably, be interpreted to allow the
owner of a single parcel to initiate the rezoning of multiple parcels of land under different ownership. The
language in Albemarle County Code S 18-33.2.1 is closer to the language in the corresponding state law in
effect prior to July 1, 1982, which authorized "any property owner" to initiate a rezoning. (former Virginia Code
J 15.1-491) However, the County's zoning regulations must be applied in a manner that is consistent with
I.
current state law and therefore, the County requires that a rezoning be initiated by an application that is signed
by each owner of the property which is the subject of the proposed rezoning. As will be eXplained in Section
2(A), this requirement means that the owner of each parcel in a planned district must sign the application. There
are limited exceptions, and they are examined in Sections 2(B) and 2(C).
2. Hollymead Town Center Area C is a planned district and. with limited exceptions. a rezonin2 that
chan2es the applicable re2ulations and reauirements in the district affects all of the properties in
the development
Hollymead Town Center Area C ("HTC-C") is a planned district that is subject to an Application Plan
and Proffers, including a proffered Code of Development (the "Code"). As a development in the PD-MC
zoning district, HTC-C is subject to Albemarle County Code SS 18-8 et seq. and 25A. The Application Plan,
Proffers and Code apply to all of the lands within HTC-C.
A. Planned districts are 20verned by specific policies and rules
The intent of a planned district is, among other things, to promote "economical and efficient land use
through unified development" and to provide "appropriate and harmonious physical development." Albemarle
County Code .~ 18-8.1. In order to qualify as a planned development, a project must meet the requirements of
Albemarle County Code S 18-8.3:
A planned development is a development that meets all of the following criteria: (1) the land is
under unified control and will be planned and developed as a whole; (2) the development is in
general accord with one or more approved application plans; and (3) in all planned development
districts other than a planned historic district, the development will provide, operate and
maintain common areas, facilities and improvements for some or all occupants of the
development where these features are appropriate. (italics added)
Consistent with the intent of planned districts generally expressed in Albemarle County Code S 18-8.1, the
intent of the PD-MC zoning district is to have commercial projects developed "under a unified planned
approach." Albemarle Cot/nty Code f 18-25A.I.
Under conventional zoning districts, each property is viewed as separate from all other properties and
developed without regulatory consideration of the uses on adjoining properties, access, setbacks, scale and
massing, or utilities. In a planned district, adjacent uses are planned to be compatible with one another.
Setbacks, heights, scale, massing, and, in many cases, architecture, constitute the unifying features of a planned
district. Because the use of the lands in a planned district is planned as a whole, the building locations and
parking needs are generally known and the owner(s) can take advantage of shared facilities such as stormwater
management, utilities, amenities, and parking. As a result, planned districts provide economical and efficient
land use through unitied development and, in many cases, greater economy of scale.
Each application for a planned district must be submitted as provided for other zoning map
amendments. Albemarle County Code S' 18-8.5.1. One of those requirements, of course, is that all of the owners
of the property affected by the rezoning must sign the application. . This rule applies not only to the creation of
the planned district but also to any amendments to the district. Albemarle COllnty Code f 18-8.6.
B. Some chan2es to a planned district do not reauire a rezonin2 consented to by all of the
owners
Some minor changes to a planned district's application plan or code may be approved by the County's
director of planning without going through the rezoning process. Albemarle COllnty Code f 18-8.5.5.3. These
minor changes are expressly delineated in Albemarle COl/nty Code S' 18-8. 5.5. 3(a):
1. Minor variations to yard requirements, maximum structure heights and minimum lot sizes;
2
..
2. Changes to the arrangement of buildings and uses shown on the plan, provided that the major
elements shown on the plan and their relationships remain the same;
3. Changes to phasing plans;
4. Minor changes to landscape or architectural standards; and
5. Minor variations to street design.
Any proposed change to an approved application plan or code that is not one of the minor variations
listed above may be accomplished only by a rezoning. Albemarle COU1Ity Code J 18-8.5.5.3. A limited number
of rezonings in a planned district have been allowed to proceed without the consent of all of the owners where
the proposed change was determined not to materially affect other parcels within the planned district. Examples
of these kinds of changes within the past 15 years include the relocation of pedestrian pathways, a change to the
zoning district designation of certain lands in the development where there was no change to the permitted uses
on those lands (e.g., land used by residents for equestrian activities in a planned district was rezoned to Rural
Areas to allow it to be eligible for land use taxation), and a modification to the applicable setback regulations in
a newly developed section of a planned district. What we have distilled from these prior examples is that they
did not propose changes in use, density, intensity, or key elements of the planned district, and they would not
impact other parcels in the planned district. Also, the planned development policies of u1I(fied c01ltrol and
planning and developing the district as a whole were not threatened by the proposed changes.
C. The proposed chan2es to the Application Plan and the Code of Development are material
and. therefore. require the consent of all of the owners within HTC-C
The ability to amend the HTC-C planned district is governed not only by the zoning regulations in
Chapter 18 of the Albemarle County Code, but also by the Proffers and the profTered Code. The relevant
portions of the Code pertaining to Block I of HTC-C provide as follows:
. Narrative: "The structure on the front site (lot one) will accommodate a casual dining restaurant with a
deck overlooking the pond. Mid-sized retailers will utilize lots two and three. This business mixture
allows for better traffic flow into, and by their use, there will be staggered peak business hours reducing
parking and traffic congestion. The buildings have been situated to offer a pleasing view from Rt. 29 as
the site ascends in a tiered fashion up the hill, and many walkways encourage shoppers to limit
vehicular traffic and enjoy the pond. By utilizing a two-story structure on lot three, the design
creatively addresses the grade differential of the topography eliminating the need for unsightly barrier
walls as well as providing a 'downtown style' street entrance on the second floor. (Code, page 6) The
proposed rezoning to increase the building height and square footage in Block I is to allow a hotel to
replace the planned retail use.
. Square footage: The non-residential square footage ranges from a minimum of 35,000 square feet to a
maximum of 55,000 square feet, with a maximum retail square footage of 55,000 square feet. (Code.
Table A, page 23) The proposed rezoning would allow the maximum square footage in Block I to
increase from 55,000 to 95,000 square feet and would correspondingly increase the overall square
footage in HTC-C.
. Building height: Buildings in Block I may have a maximum of 3 stories. (Code, Table E, page 24) The
proposed rezoning would allow the height of the buildings in Block I to increase from 3 to 4 stories.
The Code's Narrative, Tables and Appendices were proffered.
Generally, changes in one part of a planned district can greatly affect development in other parts of the
district. Thus, it is essential for unified control to be established over all parts of the development.
3
The proposed changes to the Application Plan and the Code are material to and affect all of the blocks
in HTC-C. The proposed changes in building height and square footage allowed in Block I increase the
intensity of the uses within HTC-C, specifically in Block I, and that increase will impact the other blocks. For
example, a 4-story building proposed for one block could interfere with visibility of a 2-story building in another
block. If the 2-story building was relying on wall signage for advertisement, the visibility of that signage could
be eliminated by the height increase provided for the other block. When someone buys into a planned district,
the buyer is relying on the commitments made in the planned district's application plan, proffers, and code of
development for that plan to be accomplished. Based on the description in the Code's Narrative, the proposed
change in use from "mid-sized retailers" to hotel may change the traffic impacts within HTC-C. Allowing
individual block owners within HTC-C to unilaterally increase the intensity of the use on their land destroys two
of the fundamental policies underlying planned districts - unified control and planning and developing the
planned district as a whole. For these reasons, it is essential that all owners within the planned district consent
to the substantive material changes within the district.
An apt analogy to the pending rezoning ofHTC-C can be drawn from the typical residential subdivision
and the restrictive covenants that are often recorded against, and applicable to, all of the lots. The restrictive
covenants are created to establish common rules to which all of the owners of lots in the subdivision will adhere.
Changes to those covenants typically are permitted only by the approval of the residents by either a
supermajority or unanimous vote. An individual lot owner cannot amend the covenants as they apply to its lot
to suit its needs. Thus, for example, a restrictive covenant that allows flag poles of not more than 20 feet cannot
be unilaterally amended by the owner of a single residential lot to allow flag poles up to 100 feet in height only
on that owner's lot.
3. Correction to the processin2 of the rezonin2 application
The decision that all of the owners in HTC-C must sign the rezoning application was made after the
application was filed, but before the application was accepted by the County. The applicant then submitted the
signatures of all of the owners. Thereafter, the ownership of Block VIII changed, and the new owner contacted
the County to indicate withdrawal of support for the change in Block 1. Processing of the application stopped
until the new owner signed the application.
Despite the change in ownership, the application signed by all of the owners at the time it was submitted
was a valid application. The applicants did not have to obtain the consent of the new owner in order for the
application to be processed. However, the new owner of Block VIII has indicated it will withdraw the consent
given by the prior owner, which could be done by any owner at any time prior to the Board of Supervisors
beginning its consideration of the rezoning on its meeting agenda. Albemarle County Code:J 18-33.7. The
withdrawal, though currently provided via email and confirmed through a telephone conversation with the
owner's representative, must be made in writing and be signed by the authorized representative of Block VIII's
owner.
4. Conclusion
Whether a proposed change requires the consent of all of the owners within a planned district is
determined on a case-by-case basis considering the planned district policies and regulations in the Zoning
Ordinance, the district's application plan, proffers and code of development, and the nature of the proposed
change to determine its materiality under the principles discussed herein.
In this case, the County determined that the consent of all of the owners within HTC-C was required
because the proposed changes are material. The proposed rezoning would increase the intensity of use within
HTC-C and impact other blocks, possibly change traffic patterns, and require a substantive change to the Code.
4
\ ..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Economic Development Policy Update
AGENDA DATE:
February 13, 2008
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT/PROPOSALlREQUEST:
Update of the Economic Development Policy from
1995 to reflect current conditions
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION:
LEGAL REVIEW:
YES
REVIEWED BY:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Foley, Davis, Graham, Ms. Stimart
ATTACHMENTS: YES
BACKGROUND:
The purpose of this discussion is to complete the review of the updated data that was started in December and to set
direction for updating this policy. The current Economic Development Policy is overdue for review. Draft data was updated
and provided to the Board of Supervisors for consideration in December of 2007 (See Attachment A). Beyond the review of
this data, staff needs to understand what changes to the current policy the Board believes are appropriate and to establish
the process for making those changes.
As presented to the Board in December, staff noted key trends from the updated data which include:
. Lack of land for certain types of local business expansion
. Significant loss of agricultural land, despite success in certain sectors (e.g., active grape production)
. Limited opportunity for "career-ladder" jobs, due to
o manufacturing layoffs
o An increasing percentage of low-paying jobs associated with retail sales.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Enhance the Quality of Life for all Albemarle County Residents.
DISCUSSION:
Staff believes most of the goals, objectives, and strategies in the current policy remain relevant today; however, staff also
recognizes this policy was established before adoption of the Neighborhood Model and recent major economic events
(e.g., NAFTA). In updating the Policy, staff believes it is important to consider prioritizing strategies based on available
resources, and the 5-year cycle of policy review required for any element of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff notes the
current policy has proven easier to develop than to implement, with many of the strategies only minimally addressed.
From staff's perspective, the issue has been that resources have been spread over a large number of issues, rather than
focusing attention on a limited number of higher priority strategies.
Staff believes the Goals and Objectives of this policy remain appropriate and the only changes needed would relate to new
issues the Board indicates are appropriate for the policy. Based on the staff analysis of data, there are areas upon which
to improve and enhance. Of the six objectives, staff notes that the data suggests there are three compelling trends relating
to at least five of our Policy's objectives that require priority consideration:
. Lack of Uland (Objective I, II, VI)
. Workforce development (Objective III, V)
. County's agricultural economy (Objective I)
To address these trends, staff believes the Policy should recognize the following strategy priorities:
\ ..
AGENDA TITLE:
Economic Development Policy Update
February 13, 2008
Page 2
. Increasing available land for local business expansion, with an emphasis on light-industrial zoning
. Workforce development, with an emphasis on emerging business segments
. Enhancing the economic viability of the rural economy with an emphasis on those segments that protect the
rural character
At this point in the update process, staff would like the Board's input before proceeding to initiate the Comprehensive Plan
amendment with the Planning Commission.
BUDGET IMPACT:
None, but staff believes it is important to recognize there are limited resources available to work on implementation. If
efforts are spread over too many priorities, there will either be limited progress on the strategies or a demand will be
created for additional resources.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors accept the updated data as appropriate for inclusion in an updated policy, and
provide guidance to staff regarding priority areas of the policy.
In providing guidance on policy changes, staff's recommendation is that efforts focus on the following strategy priorities:
1. Increasing available land for local business expansion, with an emphasis on light industrial zoning
2. Workforce development, with an emphasis on emerging business segments
3. Enhancing the economic viability of the rural economy, with an emphasis on those segments that protect the
rural character.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Updated Data "Analysis & Findings"
Attachment B - Existina Policy
'.
Attachment A
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
DRAFT
UPDATED STAFF ANALYSIS
AND
UPDATED ECONOMIC DATA
Table of Contents:
Analysis & Findings........... .Page 2
Attachments.................... ..Page 11
\ ..
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
WHAT WE KNOW:
Economic Growth
1. Albemarle County has experienced steady growth and will continue to grow as people
continue to move to the County. Albemarle County's population grew at 2.0% annual rate from 1980
to 1990. It is forecast to grow at a 1.5% annual rate during the 1990's and a slighrly lesser 1.3% annual
rate after the turn of the century. Migration into Albemarle County has been and should continue to be
the primary component of growth. During the 1980's, 63% of that growth was net in-migration of
people.
Updated Staff Analysis: Albemarle County's population grew 2.0% annually from 1980 to 1990,2.1 %
from 1990 to 2000, and slowed to 1.3% from 2000 to 2006. Over the entire period, 1990 to 2006,
annual population growth averaged 1.8%. VEC forecasts Albemarle County's population to grow at
1.1 % annually for the years 2006 to 2020. Net in-migration accounted for 65% of the annual growth
from 2000 to 2005, with 2005 being at 52%. Migration into Albemarle County has been, and will likely
continue to be, the primary component of growth. See "Attachment A - Population Growth."
2. At times, the County's resident labor force has grown at a rate exceeding County population
growth; yet the number of those unemployed has not increased and, in fact, the County's
unemployment rate has consistently been the lowest in the area and has stayed well below state
and national rates. Over the 10 year period from 1982 to 1992, the County's resident labor force grew
by 35% (as compared to a population growth of a litrle over 20%) and the unemployment rate averaged
3.6% annually (as compared to 5.3% at the state level and 7.1 % nationally).
Updated Staff Analysis: Previous time-series analysis from 1982 to 1992 showed the resident labor
force growing by 35%; in contrast, the 10-year period from 1990 to 2000, the County's resident labor
force grew by 19.1 % (as compared to a population growth of 23.5%) and the average annual
unemployment rate during the time period 1990 through 2000 was 2.3% (as compared to 4.0% at the
state level and 5.5% nationally). The average annual unemployment rate in the time period 2000-2006
was 2.4%. See Attachment C.
3. County residents place importance on job opportunities and economic growth, but not at the
expense of the protection and preservation of water quality, natural resources, farmland,
historic areas and open space. In Spring, 1994 Albemarle County Planning Needs Survey rating of
long-term community planning goals, bringing more jobs to the area had an average rating of 2.40 (1
being not so important, 2 being somewhat important and 3 being very important). Protecting water
quality scored an average of 2.86, preserving natural resources and open space an average of 2.73,
preserving farmland an average of 2.68 and preserving historic buildings an average of 2.53.
2
\.
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Updated Staff Analysis: In the Albemarle County 2006 Citizen's Survey rating of long-term
planning goals, promoting economic development had an average rating of 2.55 (1 being not so
important, 2 being somewhat important and 3 being very important). Protecting water quality scored
an average of 2.92, protecting natural resources and the environment an average of 2.79, and
preserving historic buildings and places 2.48. See Attachment Y - Importance of Long-term
Community Planning Goals.
Regional Context
4. While the County has the largest resident labor force in the area, the City of Charlottesville
retains a strong position as an employment center with its employers attracting a significant
number of County residents to work each day. Together the City and County are the center of a
regional economy in which the majority of the region's workers are employed in Charlottesville
and Albemarle County. There is a greater number of employed County residents than total jobs in the
County. As a result, according to the 1990 U. S Census 49% of County workers are employed in
Albemarle County, while 43% commute to Charlottesville where there are more jobs than workers.
Charlottesville remains the area's largest employment location with about 36,000 jobs (April, 1993) as
compared to about 29,000 in the County. Together, the City and County comprise the region's
employment center, employing 88% of the Planning District 10 work force.
Updated Staff Analysis: Staff analysis compares Bureau of Labor Statistics data measuring resident
labor force (the total number of employed Albemarle County residents) with numbers from the VA
Employment Commission's Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages (QCEW), which show the
total number of jobs in Albemarle County. Continuing a long-term trend, there are a greater
number of employed County residents than total jobs in the County, 48,572 versus 47,817 in 2006.
This gap, however, has narrowed since 1993. In that year, the difference equaled 5,774 whereas, by
2006 the gap diminished to 755. Also of interest is that, according to QCEW data, the County
surpassed the City in 1999 to provide the most jobs for the region. See Attachments D and E.
The 2000 Census indicates the most recent, reliable data available about commuting patterns within
both the City and the County. According to the 2000 US Census 55% of County workers commuted
within Albemarle County, up from 49% in 1990. With another 35% commuting from Albemarle
County to Charlottesville, these two areas together employed 90% of Albemarle County residents in
2000. See Attachment C.
5. By any of several measures of economic activity, Albemarle County is pacing the
Charlottesville region's economic growth. Economic trends are showing steady growth in economic
activity in Albemarle County. Reflecting its history, location and presence of the University, travel
expenditures increased 13% annually from the late 1980's into the early 1990's. Taxable sales in the
County grew at an average annual rate of 17.8% in the 1980's, continuing to grow through the recession
of the early 1990's to, for the fIrst time, exceed taxable sales in the City of Charlottesville in 1992 by $14
million. Retail sales also grew in this period at more than twice the rate of the state, with per capita
retail sales increasing from $4,867 per person in 1985 to $6,992 per person in 1992 (as compared to
state fIgures of$5,471 per person in 1985 and $6,710 per person in 1992). An analysis of retail trade
indicates that the County has become a regional market center that is a net importer of retail trade
dollars. Deposits in commercial banks have also increased steadily (13% annually from 1983 to 1992),
out pacing the state average for that period. Building activity, subject to inflation and the ups and
downs of the economy, showed steady growth throughout the 1980's, peaking in 1989, and, despite the
3
"
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
recession of the early 1990's, has continued at a fairly steady dollar level of activity in all sectors -
residential, non-residential and commercial/institutional as well as farm buildings - in 1992 and 1993.
Updated Staff Analysis: As measured by data from several different categories, Albemarle County
continues to pace the Charlottesville region's economic growth.
Tourism. For the last available three years, travel generated $172,679,351 in 2003; $189,233,741 in 2004;
$212,306,588 in 2005. According to Smith Travel Research - a proven, reliable source of hotel industry
information - compared with the state and the US, Albemarle County-Charlottesville area typically has
had a higher average occupancy rate, especially since 1993. See Attachment R - Albemarle County
Travel Expenditures
Taxable Sales. The County's per capita taxable sales have increased by approximately 50% between 1996
and 2006, an increase that is better than that of the peer-county average (42%). In 2006, the largest
taxable sales sectors, by North American Industrial Code (NAIC) by dealer, were: 1) General
Merchandise stores, 2) Building Materials and Garden Supplies, and 3) Food and Beverage stores
generating a 2006 combined tax base of $536 million. The next closest tax sector by dealer was
"Accommodation." There were 211 "Rental and Leasing Service" companies, the highest number of
dealers generating taxable sales. See Attachment S - Sales/Sales Tax.
BPOL Tax. Business, professional, and occupational license (BPOL) tax revenue serves as one proxy
for the volume of business activity taking place in a jurisdiction. In the case of Albemarle this tax
revenue increased steadily from 1996 through 2001 and in 2006 BPOL increased 17.7% over 2005
BPOL nominal revenues. BPOL per capita provides a measure of business intensity. The higher the
value of BPOL per resident, the higher the level of business activity each resident supports. In real
terms, adjusted for inflation, the County's Per-Capita BPOL tax revenue increased between 1997 and
2001 and dropped in 2002, 2003, and 2005. From 1996 to 2006, the average annual growth rate for
BPOL per capita is 5.3%. See Attachment S-2-BPOL.
Sa1Jings. Deposits in commercial banks and savings institutions increased steadily at 3.0% annually from
1994 to 2000. From 2001 to 2005, deposits jumped to average growth rate of 21.7%. Over the long-
term from 1994 to 2005, deposits grew an average of 9.9% per year. See Attachment T - Deposits in
Commercial Banks.
Building Permits. The number of new residential building permits has varied over time. Between 1990
and 2006, the number of residential building permits has averaged 669 per year and the median number
of permits is 666. The number of new commercial permits has averaged 62 per year. See Attachment U
for additional comparisons in building value and permits over time.
6. The County population is getting older, a result of both the national trend of aging baby-
boomers and the attractiveness of the area to those reaching retirement age.
The middle and older age populations aged 40 and over, which constitute empty-nesters and those
retiring, grew from 29% of the County's population in 1980 to 35% of the population in 1990, totaling
a little less than 34,000 people. By 2010, this group is forecast to total 45% of the population, or a little
over 40,000 people. By contrast, the 20-39 age-group - constituting late college/post graduate students,
young professionals and families in their prime child-bearing years - and a group that more than
doubled in number from 1970 to 1990, is forecast to remain almost stable over the 1990 to 2010
period. This shift to middle and older populations represents: population growth without job growth -
4
\
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
and without the expense of educating children; a unique housing market; and a market with a certain
amount of discretionary income to spend.
Updated Staff Analysis: Albemarle County's share of households headed by persons under 25
years of age has followed the regional pattern with the share of households headed by persons
between the ages of 25 to 44 dropping significantly over the last 15 years.
From 1990 to 2005 the share of households headed by 45 to 64 year olds has increased along with
the households over 70 years of age. Albemarle County's and the City of Charlottesville's increasing
share of households aged 45 and over is both a national phenomenon (the baby-boomers aging) and
a function of in-migration. See Attachment B.
The result of these demographic changes has been an increase in the County's median head of
household age, over time. In 1990, the County's median head of household age was 1.4 years below
the State average. By 2000 the County's median head of household age surpassed Virginia's.
7. The County population is well educated with many residents possessing bachelor's or
graduate degrees, also a reflection ofthe presence ofthe University and higher
technology jprofessional service employers. 39% of County residents had obtained at least a
bachelor's degree in 1990. Another 42% had graduated from high school, 23% having attended some
college or possessing an associate's degree.
Updated Staff Analysis: 39% of County residents had obtained at least a bachelor's degree in 1990.
Another 42% had graduated from high school, 23% having attended some college or possessing an
associate's degree. By the year 2000, 48% of County residents aged 25 and older had obtained at least a
bachelor's degree. Another 18% had graduated from high school, 22% had attended some college or
possessed an associate's degree. As of the 2005 "American Community Survey" Census, over 54% of
County residents aged 25 and older had obtained at least a bachelor's degree or higher; all the other
segments had declined from 2000 levels. The ACS margin of error, with a 90% confidence interval,
could put this number anywhere from 45.2% to 63.4%. It would be difficult to conclude that
significantly more residents had advanced degrees in 2005 over 2000 levels. See Attachment I for more
information about educational attainment.
Economic Health
8. The University of Virginia remains the dominant employer in terms of numbers of
employees, but is providing and will likely continue to directly provide a decreasing share of
the County's and the area's overall employment. The University employs some
12,000 persons in its academic and medical centers combined, representing 18% of the
City/County total employment (this compared to 20% in 1985). While the University expects to add
some 2,000 students in the next 10 years, it expects to do so essentially without increase in its total
employment.
5
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Updated Staff Analysis: The University of Virginia remains a dominant employer in terms of the
number of employees. The University employs ahnost 12,000 employees in its academic and medical
centers combined, representing, on average, 25% of the County's total employment. The University
collects only 8% of its budget from the state, and for this reason is engaged in a $3 billion private
endowment campaign over the next five years, until 2011, to fund program development and
expansion. The growth in number ofUV A employees (academic and medical centers) is growing faster
than the student population (undergraduate, graduate, medical schools). From 2001 to 2006, UV A
employment grew, on average, 3.2 percent while student growth was 1.2 percent for the same period.
UV A student growth is expected to increase by 184 students (net change) per year through 2011. See
Attachment C.
9. The types of jobs provided by the County's employers, following national trends, are
becoming more trade and services oriented. While government and manufacturing continue to
provide the most jobs (28% and 20% respectively), the greatest growth in County employment sectors
has been in services and wholesale/retail trade. This reflects national trends of contracting
manufacturing employment while trades and services are experiencing growth. Yet, for both sectors the
proportion of all County jobs (18.5% and 17% respectively) is still below statewide proportional
averages. Since 1982, manufacturing employment has experienced virtually no change. In the
Charlottesville Metro Statistical Area, manufacturing employment is forecast to decrease by 10% over
the next 10 years, while services are forecast to grow by 36% and wholesale and retail trade by 24%.
Within the services sector, social services, legal services and engineering and management services are
forecast to have the greatest growth.
Updated Staff Analysis: While government continues to provide the most jobs (34% in 2005, and
32% in 2006), a major shift has occurred with manufacturing job loss and significant increases in retail
trade employment. Since 1990 manufacturing jobs have dropped from 19% of the total job base to 6%,
experiencing an average annual decline of 4.6% per year from 1990 to 2006. Over this same period,
retail employment grew from 9 to 11.4% of the total employment base, bringing it up to the second
largest employment sector, behind state government. See Attachment F - 1990, 2000 & 2006
Employment Trends.
In terms of average annual growth over the period from 1990 to 2006, the fastest growing sectors are
federal-government employment (16%, or 690 jobs), professional and technical services (11.4%, or
2,723 jobs), and health care (10.2%, or 4,133 jobs). Several other sectors also experienced strong
growth: information at 6.6% (or 714 jobs), education, at 6.1 % (or 346 jobs), and the arts and
entertainment at 5.0% (or 1,172 jobs). Real estate experienced moderate growth at 6.1 % from 1990 to
2000, but declined to an average growth rate of 1.1 % per year from 2000 to 2006. See Attachment F -
1990, 2000 & 2006 Employment Trends.
A QCEW third-quarter, 2006 comparison with James City County, the City of Charlottesville and the
state shows that Albemarle County is significantly more dependent on the government employment
sector than the others: Albemarle County's base is 32% government employees. In the next largest
segment, James City County, the City of Charlottesville and the State have a higher proportion of
"Retail" and "Accommodation/Food Service." James City County and the State have higher
percentages of manufacturing than Albemarle County and the City of Charlottesville. The State has the
highest proportion of "Professional and Technical Services," at 9.6 % of the economic base and leads
by a significant margin over the other jurisdictions, particularly Albemarle County. See Attachment F -
Employment by Two-Digit North American Industrial Classification (NAIC) code.
6
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
10. The occupation of County workers, reflecting the presence of the University as well as other
higher technology jprofessional service employers, is fairly concentrated in managerial and
specialty occupations and technician, sales and support occupations.
Close to 70% of labor force occupations are executive, administrative, managerial and professional
specialty (36%) or technicians, sales and administrative support (33%). Statewide, there is a lower
concentration in these groups (61 %). Only 8% of occupations are operators, fabricators and laborers.
Statewide, there is a higher concentration in this group (14%). (See Attachment H)
Updated Staff Analysis: Per the 2000 Census, over 85% of the labor force occupations are managerial
and professional, service, and sales and office - the highest in the region, besides the City. From VEC's
occupations forecast (2004-2014) for the Piedmont region VI, a comparison of the region to the State
shows there is a slighrly lower proportion of these groups statewide. Compared to the state averages,
the Piedmont Region VI has more health care professionals (8.2% versus the state's 6.0%), educators
(7.8% versus the state's 5.4%) and construction/extraction occupations (7.9% versus 6.4%) than the
State. (See attachment H).
11. While the number of employers in the County is increasing, the number employed by those
employers has remained relatively stable. The number of employers in the County has grown from
1,192 in 1987 to 1,584 in 1993. Employment in Albemarle County establishments was 29,045 in April,
1987 and 29,167 in April, 1993. Taking into account the physical relocation of UV A Hospital
employees from the County to the City during this time period, this indicates that employment in other
sectors actually increased. Major employers of over 150 employees (not including the University)
accounted for 19% of the total County labor force in 1993. This compares with 22% of the total labor
force in 1987. (See Attachment J)
Updated Staff Analysis: At 3.8% per year, the number of employers in the County has grown more
quickly than average annual population growth (1.8%) and the average annual employment growth
(2.4%) during the period 1990 to 2006. Excluding UV A employment, a slight majority of employees are
employed by companies with 20 to 50 employees. This is also consistent with the State's average
employment, although Albemarle County has proportionately fewer larger-sized companies than the
state. See Attachment J.
12. While the County has relatively high incomes when compared to the region and the state,
wages in many employment sectors are below the state average for those sectors. Both median
family and median household income figures for Albemarle County residents have, over time
consistenrly exceeded the Charlottesville region and state medians. In 1993, median family income was
115% of state median. Yet, except for the agriculture and government employment sectors, wages
provided by the County's employers are below state averages. In 1992, the manufacturing, trade and
services sectors were respectively, 98%, 81 % and 70% of state average. A closer look at the service
sector reveals that several service provider-type jobs -legal, membership and
engineering/ management - exceed state average, but that the remaining job types, many of which are
service providers (ex: hotels /lodging, personal, business, health services, social services, household) are
below state average, some substantially so.
Updated Staff Analysis: In 2004 Albemarle County median income was 110% of the state median
income; median household income was 111 % of the State's. Average annual Albemarle County median
income appears to growing more slowly than that of the City of Charlottesville and the State. See
Attachment K.
7
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
In 2005 for the following industries, Albemarle County wages were comparable or exceeded state
wages: manufacturing, retail, information, health care, arts and entertainment, accommodations and
food, and real estate. Several key industry sectors pay less than the state average: public administration,
professional and technical services. See Attachment M for historic wage comparisons to the State.
13. While families and persons living in poverty in the County have consistently fallen, poverty
still exists for a segment ofthe population. From 1970 to 1990, the number of families experiencing
poverty fell from about 1,150 to a little more than 800. Nevertheless, this represented nearly 5% of
families and over 4,000 persons.
Updated Staff Analysis: From 1970 to 2000, the number of families experiencing poverty fell from
1,150 to 879. In 2000 this represented 4 percent of families and slightly over 5,000 people. By 2006 the
Census estimated poverty had increased to 5,975 people, with a margin of error of 1.9%.
Another metric is to measure the population at or below 200% of poverty. Per the 2000 Census, this
group comprised about 20% of the total population, or 15,286 people. See Attachment N.
14. The Charlottesville area has consistently ranked at or near the bottom of urban regions in
the state in housing affordability. The Virginia Real Estate Research Center at Virginia
Commonwealth University measured housing affordability in Charlottesville as last in the state's urban
regions in both 1992 and 1993 based on average home price, prevailing mortgage interest rates and
median family income. Using Census derived information, about 14% of County households spend
more than 30% of household income monthly on home owner costs. About 33% of households spend
more than 30% on rent.
Updated Staff Analysis: Over time, housing affordability has decreased throughout the state. Of the
homes owned in Albemarle, 19% (20% for Virginia) of the owners paid more than 30% of their
monthly income towards housing costs in 1999. Also in 1999, 38% of Albemarle County and 34% of
Virginia renters paid more than 30% of their income for rent. See Attachment 0 - Affordability.
Housing assessment data is another indicator of affordability for home-buyers. Assessment data from
2000 to 2006 shows a widening gap between housing assessed below $150,000 and above $300,000. See
Attachment P, Housing Assessment.
Per the October 2006 Housing Needs Report, the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission
estimates that college students consume about 53% of the rental stock in Charlottesville area, which has
an obvious impact on the Albemarle County rental stock. The study also notes that the students help
drive up the cost of renting by bringing in cost-of-living allowances from parents who live in higher-
cost-of-living areas. On page 12 of the main report, the authors note that the supply of rental housing is
insufficient to keep pace with demand, as evidenced by the very low 2005 MSA vacancy rate of 3.9%.
In September 2007 the Charlottesville Area Association of Realtors (CAAR) database showed 97
properties in the County priced at $190,000 or less; in November 2007, CAAR had 99 homes on the
market priced at $190,000 or less. CAAR's Q3 2007 market report indicates that there is roughly a
twenry month supply of unsold housing inventory on the market in the Charlottesville MSA (page 6 of
the report). This figure is well above the five- or six-month supply that, as a rule of thumb, is
considered by many real estate professionals to represent a "balanced" housing market. This situation
suggests strong downward pressure on housing prices in our region, a condition which might result in
relatively greater housing affordability in the near future than has been the case in recent years.
8
"
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
One last metric, the Fourth-Quarter 2006 ACCRA Cost of Living Index, providing comparative data
for 274 urban areas, including the Charlottesville Metro area, reported a composite index of 110.7 for
this area, with 100 as the national average. Of six categories, housing costs were the highest
component by far at 128.1 and utilities were the lowest at 92.4. For additional information about
ACCRA, see: http://www.coli.org/
15. Agriculture and forestry, while not growing as a share of the overall Albemarle
County economy, nevertheless remain an important component. When adjusted for inflation,
total value of agricultural products sold in 1992 was about $15.5 million, down from about $16.8
million in 1987 and about $21.0 million in 1974. Albemarle ranked 25th in the state, (1992) in total
value of agricultural products sold and 15th in livestock sales. In some specialty areas, such as horses,
grapes, peaches and apples, sheep and lamb operations, purebred catde operations, pine stumpage
value, and hay production, there is increasing activity and the County ranks higher among state,
localities.
Updated Staff Analysis: From the last agriculture census in 2002, Albemarle County's total agriculture
was $19 million, down 13% from $21 million in 1997, and ranked 35th in Virginia. Crop sales accounted
for $6.7 million, and livestock accounted for $12 million of the total value. Average market value of
production per farm dropped 14% from 1997, $24,000 to 2002, $20,000. Average size dropped from
202 acres in 1997 to 193 acres in 2002 and aggregate cash-farm-income was a deficit of $1.8 million, or
$2,006 per farm. Even with these losses of production and farmland, the County continues to lead the
state for horses and viticulture. See Attachments V & W.
16. An inventory of designated land exists in the County for economic expansion, some of
which is concentrated in larger consolidated areas. Nearly 1,400 acres of developable industrial
land is designated in the County's Comprehensive Plan. Approximately 750 additional acres exist for
office and commercial development. Approximately 450 acres of industrial land and 240 acres
office/ commercial land would need to be zoned for development to proceed. A September, 1993
report entided "Consolidated Industrial Areas in Albemarle County" identified eight areas under one
ownership or a limited number of ownerships ranging in size from 12 acres to 240 acres. Two areas
exceeded 200 acres in size. (See Attachment X)
Updated Staff Analysis: Nearly 2,050 acres of land is designated for industrial uses in the County's
Comprehensive land, of that as much as 933 is identified in 2007 as "vacant" or "underutilized," per a
definition of having less that $20,000 of building improvement. This represents a decline from the1993
Comprehensive Plan's estimate of 1,381 acres of vacant land designated for Industrial Service. An
examination of vacant land with the appropriate Light Industrial zoning as well as appropriate
designation in the Comprehensive Plan for Industrial Service indicates a greater shortage of area for
light industry: Of the deeded records, only 111 acres are vacant or underutilized. See Appendix X. The
County should continue to monitor this situation while remaining aware of the fact that, in years to
come, because of the differential in land prices between Albemarle and other jurisdictions in our region,
Albemarle might have difficulty attracting light industrial firms.
9
';
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
THE POLICY:
No recommended changes to the policy at this time.
10
..
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment A - Population Growth
PODulation Size
Albemarle Co. Charlottesville Virqinia
% Annual % Annual % Annual
Year Pop. Growth POD. Growth Pop. Growth
1950 26,662 --- 25,969 --- 3,318,680 ---
1960 30,969 1.5% 26,427 0.17% 3,996,949 1.9%
1970 37,780 2.0% 38,880 3.94% 4,651,448 1.5%
1980 55,783 4.0% 39,916 0.26% 5,346,818 1.4%
1990 68,172 2.0% 40,831 0.23% 6,216,884 1.5%
2000 84,186 2.1% 40,019 -0.20% 7,104,078 1.3%
2010 96,247 1.3% 40,639 0.15% 8,010,342 1.2%
2020 107,760 1.1% 41 ,423 0.19% 8,917,575 1.1%
Sources: US Census, Weldon Cooper for past data, VEC for forecast
Percent of
total
Population Natural Implied Net population
Annual Monthly Change Increase Migration change due
An nual An nual Natural Natural from t to between between to net
Population Births Deaths increase Increase t+1 t and t+1 t and t+1 m ig ration
2000 lAoril1 84 186 1 054 632 422 35 - - - -
2001 liulv 1) 85 800 968 574 394 33 1,614 514 1,101 68.2
2002 (july 1) 86,700 973 594 379 32 900 387 514 57.1
2003 (july 1) 88,100 1,018 606 412 34 1,400 396 1,005 71.8
2004 (july 1) 89,600 960 598 362 30 1,500 387 1,113 74.2
2005 (july 1) 90,400 1,056 650 406 34 800 384 416 52.0
2006 (july 1) 90,806 *** ***
Sources: JAverage: 1,2431 Average: 64.6
Weldon Cooper: http://www3.ccps.virginia.edu/demographics/ Median 68.2
esti mates/2005/2005 _estimates_ Virgi nia .xls
Dept of Health: http://www.vdh.state.va.us/HealthS1als/stats.asp, 2006 data is provisional.
Ag gregate Aggregate Population- WorkForce-
Time Growth Growth Time Average Ann ual Average
Peri od Population Rate WorkForce Rate Period Growt h Annual Growth
1990 68,172 - 32,613 -- 1990-2000 2.1% 1.8%
2000 84.186 23.5% 38,838 19.1% 2000-2006 1.3% 3.5%
2006 90,806 33.2% 47,817 46.6% 1990-2006 1.8% 2.4%
Source: VEC, Weldon Cooper Center
Source: VEC, Weldon Cooper Center
11
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment B - Age Demographics
Head of Household Age Distribution
Albemarle County, Virginia, and United State
2005
5.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
0.0%
15-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80-84
85+
I_Albemarle County _Virginia 0 USA I
Source: Claritas, Inc.; ZHA
Tables/2005 age distribution
Comparing the County's household age distribution to the state and nation indicates that Albemarle County has a
greater proportion of its households headed by 15 to 24 year olds and fewer households headed by persons 35 to 44
years of age. Surprisingly, given the County's reputation as a retirement destination, the County has a lower share of its
households above the age of 65 as compared to the state and nation.
12
~
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Head of Household Age Distribution
Albemarle County
1990 - 2005
25.0%
I
I
30.0%
20.0%
5.0%
15.0%
10.0%
0.0%
15-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80-84
85+
1_1990 _ 20051
Source: Claritas, Inc.; ZHA
Tables/age distribution 19902005
The share of households headed by persons under 25 years of age has increased in the County while the share of
households between the ages of25 to 44 has dropped significantly over the last 15 years. The share of households
headed by 45 to 64 year olds has increased along with households over 70 years of age.
1990 2006 1990 2006
%of % of % of % of
15-24 %of %of 25-44 Total Total
Total Total
VIRGINIA 958,422 8% 7% 2,132,44 17% 14%
4
ALBEMARLE 12,608 9% 8% 23,559 17% 12%
CULPEPER 3,750 13% 6% 9,129 33% 14%
FLUVANNA 1,518 6% 5% 4,033 16% 14%
GREENE 1,262 6% 6% 3,721 18% 15%
LOUISA 2,594 6% 6% 6,442 16% 13%
NELSON 1,508 6% 6% 3,897 15% 11%
ORANGE 2,577 12% 6% 6,461 30% 13%
CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY 10,397 13% 14% 12,916 16% 14%
1990 US Census, Weldon Cooper Center
13
"
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment C - Albemarle County Labor Force, as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
Annual Not Seasonally-Adusted Labor Force, Employment & Unemployment data in Albemarle County, VA, US
AC
AC Resident AC AC Une mployment
Year Labor Force Employment Unemployment Rate VA US
1982 27,543 26,038 1,505 5.5% 7.7% 9.7%
1983 31,931 30,7 04 1,227 3.8% 6.1% 9.6%
1984 33,830 32,516 1,314 3.9% 5.0% 7.5%
1985 31,953 30,384 1,569 4.9% 5.6% 7.2%
1986 31,682 30,5 07 1,175 3.7% 5.0% 7.0%
1987 32,51 1 31,596 915 2.8% 4.2% 6.2%
1988 33,682 32,778 904 2.7% 3.9% 5.5%
1989 34,40 4 33,544 860 2.5% 3.9% 5.3%
1990 36,96 1 36,053 908 2.5% 4.3% 5.5%
1991 36,101 34,8 28 1,273 3.5% 5.8% 6.7%
1992 37,256 35,720 1,536 4.1 % 6.4% 7.4%
1993 35,895 34,906 989 2.8% 5.2% 6.9%
1994 36,603 35,7 66 837 2.3% 4.7% 6.1%
1995 37,075 36,361 714 1.9% 4.5% 5.6%
1996 38,160 37,361 799 2.1 % 4.3% 5.4%
1997 38,390 37,7 81 609 1.6% 3.7% 4.9%
1998 39,644 39,193 451 1.1 % 2.8% 4.5%
1999 39,939 39,5 03 436 1.1 % 2.7% 4.2%
2000 43,30 4 42,562 742 1.7% 2.3% 4.0%
2001 43,579 42,636 943 2.2% 3.2% 4.7%
2002 44,263 43,073 1,190 2.7% 4.2% 5.8%
2003 44,874 43,581 1,293 2.9% 4.1% 6.0%
2004 47,095 45,918 1,177 2.5% 3.7% 5.5%
2005 48,625 47,543 1,082 2.2% 3.5% 5.1%
2006 49,761 48,572 1,189 2.4% 3.0% 4.6%
AVE. Ann Growth 1982-2006 2.8% 4.4% 6.0%
AVE. An n. Growth 1990-200 0 2.3% 4.0% 5.5%
AVE. Ann. Growth 2000-2006 2.4% 3.4% 5.1%
Total resident labor growth, 1982-1992 35.3%
Total resident labor growth, 1990-2000 17.2%
Bureau of Labor statistics, as reported byVEC, http://WIMN.vec.virginia.gov/vecportaU
Note: The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) uses a fundamentally diverging approach to counting
employment than the VEC's process for collecting employment data, as reported in their Quarterly
Census of Employment & Wages (QCEW). As a result, these two sources historically report differing
numbers for "total employment." BLS Data collected in this attachment will not match QCEW data
presented in Attachment J and elsewhere QCEW is cited.
14
~
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment C (Continued) - Labor Force, Commute Patterns, UV A Employment
Commute Patterns
2000 Census
Albemarle County %of
Workers Total
Total 39,151 100.0%
Albemarle 21,455 54.8%
Charlottesville 13,886 35.5%
htt ://www.census.ov/oulation/www/cen2000/commutin.html#VA
From the 2000 Census, 54.8 % of Albemarle County residents worked in Albemarle, 35.5 % of
Albemarle County residents worked in the City of Charlottesville.
op mployers
2000-2006 - 1 st Quarter figures , top 1 O-em ployers
First Quarter
Results
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2006
UVA and UVA UVA and UVA UV A and UVA UVA and UVA UVA and UVA UV A and UVA
1 I lealth Services Health Services Health Services Health Services I lealth Services Health Services
County of County of County of County of County of County of
2 Albemarle Albemarle Albemarle Albemarle Albemarle Albemarle
State Farm State Farm State Farm State Farm State Farm State Farm
3 Insurance Insurance Insurance Insurance Insurance Insurance
GE Fanuc GE Fanuc N orthrop-
Automation Mfg. Automation Mfg. N orthrop- Northrop- Grumman
4 Inc. Inc. Litton Marine Grumman (Litton) Grumman (Litton) Corporation
GE Fanuc GE Fanuc Department of
Comdial Business Automation Mfg. Automation Mfg. Department of Defense
5 Communications Litton Marine Inc. Inc. Defense
FIC Staffing Fl C Staffing GE Fanuc GE Fanuc
Comdial Business Services and Services and Automation Mfg. Automation Mfg.
6 Litton Marine Communications Systems Systems Inc. Inc.
FIC Staffing
Services and
7 ConAllfa Inc Crutchfield Corp Crutchfield Corp Crutchfield Corp Systems Crutchfield Corp
FIC Staffing Piedmont Piedmont Piedmont
Services and Community Community Community
8 Systems College College College Crutchfield Corp Boars Head Inn
FIC Staffing
Services and Central Telephone
9 Crutchfield Corp Systems Co. of VA Boars Head Inn Americare Plus Americare Plus
Piedmont Piedmont Piedmont
Community Community Community
10 College Boars Head Inn Boars I lead Inn Americare Plus College College
T
E
1
15
~
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
University of Virginia
A Ilproveded Fall Census Headcount Enrollment Plans
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 ]998 1999 2000
Art""' Art,,"! Art,,"! Ad""! Act""! Act,,"' Art",! Act,,"! Ac,,,,! ~ Art"" Act, ,,1
Undergraduate 11,199 11,304 11,306 11,371 11,392 11,502 11,949 12,040 12,296 ]2,440 12,463 12,489
1st-Year 2574 2568 2539 2802 2675 2761 2876 2827 2908 2907 2924 2927
New Transfers 505 539 486 469 454 479 577 558 535 577 540 494
Graduate 4,551 4,665 4,615 4,565 4,633 4,505 4,403 4,220 4,155 4,110 3.998 4,160
1 st-Professional ],694 1,693 1,685 1,668 1,683 1,697 1,703 1,699 1,680 1,652 1,645 1,607
Cont & Prof Studies 466 475 400 412 365 307 343 320 286 261 240 294
On Grounds Total 17,910 18,137 18,006 18,016 18,073 18,011 18,398 18,279 18,417 18,463 18,346 18,550
Off-Grounds 2,969 2,973 3,335 3,519 3,321 3,410 3,330 3,209 3,525 3,636 4,087 3,861
Total 20.879 21,110 21,341 21.535 21,394 21,421 21,728 21,488 21,942 22,099 22,433 22,411
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 " 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Ar',,"! A~ Ar',,"! Act",1 Act".! Prr'or'o" A'!,,"! Pr^'orto" Prr'or."" Pr^'Or'O" Pro' orto" Proiected
Undergraduate 12,595 12,748 12,907 13,140 I 13,401 13,275 13,353 13,350 13,425 13,565 13,700 13,850
1st-Year 2980 2999 3101 3096 3 112 3100 3091 3 170 3170 3240 3240 3310
New Transfers 541 508 493 529 532 515 503 520 520 525 525 530
Graduate 4,301 4,459 4,616 4,632 4,699 4,732 4,791 4,782 4,832 4,882 4,932 4,982
1st-Professional 1,608 1,608 1,631 1,650 1,694 1,650 1,699 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650
Con! & Prof Studies 344 382 489 596 605 625 554 650 675 700 725 750
IOn Grounds Total 18,848 19,197 19,643 20,018 20,399 20,282 20,397 20,432 20,582 20,797 21,007 21,232
Off-Grounds 3,891 3,947 3,434 3,323 3,366 3,350 3,671 3,350 3,350 3,350 3,350 3,350
Tota! 22,739 23.144 23,077 23,341 23,765 23,632 24,068 23,782 23,932 24,147 24,357 24,582
Diff. 405 -67 264 424 303 -286 150 215 210 225
% Increase 1.8% -0.3% 1.1% 1.8% -0.6% 1.3% -1.2% 0.6% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9%
Note: The 1 st- Year and New Transfer counts are included in the Undergraduate totals 0.7%
Institutional Assessment and Studies
1989-2006 Ave. Ann % 0.8% December 5, 2006 I
2000-2005 Ave. Ann% 1.2% AODfoved bv the BOY Mav 2005
UV A EMPLOYMENT:
4th
quarter
% of County Employment:
2000
23.3%
2001
27.2%
2002
24.7%
2003
23.8%
2004 2005
24.2% 23.2%
Average Annual growth: 3.2%,2001-2006
UV A Source: UV A Institutional Assessment Studies, 12/5/2006
UVA
Year Employees % Growth Students % Growth
2001 9,681 22,739
2002 9,999 3.3% 23,144 1.8%
2003 10,783 7.8% 23,077 -0.3%
2004 10,912 1.2% 23,341 1.1%
2005 11 ,492 5.3% 23,765 1.8%
2006 11,693 1.7% 24,068 1.3%
Ave. Ann. Growth '01-061 3.8%1 I 1.1%
16
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment D - Employment Trends - Charlottesville
Employed
City Total City
Residents Employment
Year (B LS) (QC EW)
1993 19,451 36,199
1994 19,401 36,545
1995 19,726 36,616
1996 1 7,993 37,388
1997 18,198 38,502
1998 1 7,966 37,488
1999 17,857 36,792
2000 18,694 38,838
2001 18,391 37,981
2002 18,168 37,327
2003 17,848 35,376
2004 1 7,555 35,461
2005 18,176 35 965
2006 20,077 36,689
Source: VEC, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
VEC Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages
Charlottesville Employment Trends
45,000
40,000
35,000
~ 30,000
Q)
>- 25,000
o
c. 20,000
JJ 15,000
10,000
5,000
____ Employed City
Residents (BLS)
Total City
Employment
(QCEW)
9'.>~ 9'.>~ ~ 9'.>C!> ~" ~~ ~~
"q) "q) "q) "q) r65 r65 r65
17
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment E - Albemarle County Employment Trends
Employed
County T ota I Cou nty
Reside nts Employment
Year (BLS) (QCEW)
1993 34,906 29,132
1994 35,766 30,397
1995 36,361 31 , 136
1996 37,361 32,276
1997 37,781 32,910
1998 39,193 35,687
1999 39,503 38,036
2000 42,562 38,838
2001 42,636 38,718
2002 43,732 39,478
2003 44,470 41,882
2004 45,918 43,822
2005 47,593 45,256
2006 48,572 47,817
Source: VEC, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
VEC Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages
Employment Trends - Albemarle County
60,000
50,000
10,000
~ Employed County
Residents (BLS)
:g 40,000
CI)
>-
o
c.
E
w
30,000
Total County
Employment
(QCEW)
20,000
~r:, ~~ ~ ~Oj ~" ~r:, ~~
,,OJ ,,OJ ,,OJ ,,OJ ~ ~ ~
18
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment F Albemarle County Industry Trends, 1990 - 2006, Average Annual Growth
Albemarle County Employment by Place of Work and Industry A.C. Average Annual Growth VA
Percent of
Industrv Sector 1990 2000 2006 2006 Total Net 1990-2006 1990-2000 2000-2006 1990-2006 1990-2006
Total 32,613 38,838 47,817 100.0% 15204 1.8% 3.5% 2.4% 1.6%
Govt Total 11,880 11,336 15,753 32.9% 3,873 -0.5% 5.6% 1.8% 3.9%
Govt State 9,751 8,159 11,528 24.1% 1,777 -1.8% 5.9% 1.1% 8.5%
Trade-Retail 2,890 4,531 5,450 11.4% 2,560 4.6% 3.1% 4.0% 0.8%
Health Care 869 3,034 4,133 8.6% 3,264 13.3% 5.3% 10.2% 2.0%
Govt Local 2.065 3.106 3,535 7.4% 1 ,4 70 4.2% 2.2% 3.4% 9.2%
Manufacturing 6,056 4,395 2,848 6.0% (3.208) -3.2% -7.0% -4.6% -2.3%
Construction 2,137 2,729 3,391 7.1% 1,254 2.5% 3.7% 2.9% 1.6%
Accommodation/Food 2,386 2,078 2.997 6.3% 611 -1.4% 6.3% 1.4% 2.3%
Other Services 1,083 1,435 1,533 3.2% 450 2.9% 1.1% 2.2% 1.4%
Prof/Tech Svc. 481 1 ,428 2,723 5.7% 2,242 11.5% 11.4% 11.4% 4.3%
Adm in /Waste Svc. 793 1,439 1,610 3.4% 817 6.1 % 1.9% 4.5% 3.4%
Mgmt. of Companies 820 1,199 1,514 3.2% 694 3.9% 4.0% 3.9% 5.6%
Arts/Enter/Rec 534 947 1,172 2.5% 638 5.9% 3.6% 5.0% 1.6%
Information 253 694 714 1.5% 461 10.6% 0.5% 6.7% 0.9%
Real Estate 426 769 765 1.6% 339 6.1 % -0.1% 3.7% 1.2%
Finance/Insurance 439 815 864 1.8% 425 6.4% 1.0% 4.3% 1.8%
Trade-Who lesale 450 565 607 1.3% 157 2.3% 1.2% 1.9% 1.0%
Educational Svc. 240 431 621 1.3% 381 6.0% 6.3% 6.1% n/a
Aarirulture 465 487 466 1.0% 1 0.5% -0.7% 0.0% 0.2%
Transoortation 330 471 591 1.2% 261 3.6% 3.9% 3.7% 0.1%
Govt Federal 64 71 690 1.4% 626 1.0% 46.1% 16.0% 2.0%
Mining 64 45 54 0.1% (10) -3.5% 3.1% -1.1% -3.1%
Utilities *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** -3.5%
http://velma.virtuallmLcom/analyzer/saintro .asp?cat=1 ND&session= ind202 &ti me= &g eo=
as reported in the VEC's QCEW reports
ManufacturinI! Emolovment Losses
Cornoanv Peak Ernolovrnent Departure Date
Corndial 1,200 2001
ConAgra 890 *
Acme Visible Records 220 *
Badger 189 2007
Siemens 625 *
Avionics Specialties 200 2007
Cooper Industries (Murray) ** 1991
* These companies left prior to June, 2005
** This data is unavailable
Source: County phone surveys, VEC data
19
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Continued ---- Attachment F - 3rd Quarter QCEW 2006 Employment by Industry, 2-Digit NAIC, for
City, Counties, and Virginia
Industry Sector
A.C.
Emp.
Ave. Ann.
Growth
Albemarle
Percent of Economic Base
100.0
%
Total N. of Employees 48,340 3,638,687 26,237
Source: VEC "Community Profiles, as reported for Third-Quarter, 2006.
A.C.
VA
Govt Total
15,521
1.7%
32.1%
17.4%
4.2%
4.0%
9.2%
11.6%
9.0%
7.9%
7.0%
8.3%
3.5%
9.6%
5.8%
2.1%
1.5%
3.7%
2.5%
1.6%
3.3%
1.4%
0.4%
2.8%
0.3%
99.6%
James
City Co.
16.4%
0.1%
5.8%
10.4%
12.5%
5.7%
7.2%
7.2%
12.4%
1.4%
4.7%
3.9%
1.6%
13.9%
1.6%
0.5%
4.0%
2.6%
0.3%
0.2%
3.5%
0.0%
99.7%
C'ville
26.5%
1.7%
17.3%
7.5%
12.1%
9.8%
2.5%
5.6%
13.4%
4.3%
8.0%
2.9%
0.8%
0.5%
3.3%
4.1%
1.7%
2.0%
1.2%
0.2%
0.9%
0.0%
99.7%
36,681
20
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment G - Industry Employment Forecast
Industry Employment & Projections data in Piedmont
Workforce Network, (L WIA VI) from Base Year 2004
to Projected Year 2014
NAICS Segment 2004 2014 Ave Ann. % Total %
Total 2004-2014
11 Aariculture 598 637 0.63 6.5
21 Minina *** *** *** ***
22 Utilities *** *** *** ***
23 Constructio n 12,335 14,038 1.3 13.8
31 Manufacturing 9,768 9,775 0.01 0.1
42 Wholesale Trade 3,592 3,936 0.92 9.6
44 Retail Trade 1 7,438 19,351 1.05 11
48 Transportation/W arehousi ng 2,375 2,734 1.42 15.1
51 Information 3,127 3,587 1.38 14.7
52 Finance/Insurance 3,047 3,251 0.65 6.7
53 Real Estate 2,173 2,515 1.47 15.7
54 Professio nal/T echnical 7,112 10,771 4.24 51.4
55 Mamt of Comoanies 2,034 2,482 2.01 22
56 Administrative, Suooort, Waste Mamt 4,337 5,479 2.36 26.3
61 Educational Services 22,985 27,372 1.76 19.1
62 Health Care/Social Services 1 7,538 26,487 4.21 51
71 Arts, Entertainment 2,076 2,417 1.53 16.4
72 Accommodation/Food Services 12,644 15,390 1.98 21.7
81 Other SeNices 5,049 6,174 2.03 22.3
Source: VEC, Projections Team and Bureau of Labor Statistics
21
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment H - Occupations
Piedmont Workforce Network (LWIA VI) Occupations, Estimated 2004
VA % of total Subtotal LWIAVI %of Total
Total 3,871,342 100.0% 153,544 100.0%
Management 165,801 4.3% 5,434 3.5%
Business/Finance 213,319 5.5% 5,731 3.7%
Com Dut/M ath 174,514 4.5% 3,537 2.3%
Arch/En a 80,480 2.1% 2,773 1.8%
Scien ce 39,816 1.0% 2,677 1.7%
Social Services 40,058 1.0% 1,415 0.9%
Legal 35,513 0.9% 1,029 0.7%
Edu/Library 208,884 5.4% 12,000 7.8%
Arts/Sports/med ia 61 ,761 1.6% 2,470 1.6%
Health care 231,748 6.0% 32.3% 12,651 8.2% 32.4%
Protective Svc 85,950 2.2% 3,409 2.2%
Food PieD 267.198 6.9% 13262 8.6%
BIde Mainetnance 151,643 3.9% 6,172 4.0%
Persona I care 113,668 2.9% 4.449 2.9%
Sales 462,951 12.0% 17.333 11.3%
Office & Admin 594,579 15.4 % 43.3% 24,792 16.1% 45.2%
75.6% 77.6%
Farming/Fishing 50,191 1.3% 783 0.5%
Construc./Extrac 246,449 6.4% 12,056 7.9%
InstalVRepair 169,785 4.4% 6,172 4.0%
Production 222,564 5.7% 7,119 4.6%
Transp/Moving 254,470 6.6% 8,280 5.4%
24.4% 22.4%
Source: VEC, Industry & Occupational Projections, 2004-2014
No data available for Albemarle County.
Occupations, TJPDC, per
2000 Census T JPDC C'ville Albemarle Fluvanna Greene Louisa Nelson
Managerial. professional 40,373 9,206 44% 20.541 52% 3,272 33% 2.549 32% 2,936 24% 1,869 28%
SeNice 13916 4092 20% 4415 11% 1504 15% 1.206 15% 1 683 14% 1016 15%
Sales & Office 23100 4874 23% 8860 22% 2750 28% 2 109 26% 3025 25% 1482 22%
Subtotal 87% 85% 77% 73% 63% 64%
Farming, fishing & forestry 792 42 0% 249 1% 111 1% 51 1% 142 1% 197 3%
Construction. extraction,
maintenance 9827 1189 6% 3061 8% 1 167 12% 1 106 14% 2223 18% 1081 16%
Production, transpor1ation,
material moving 9,367 1.540 7% 2,458 6% 1.008 10% 1,064 13% 2.195 18% 1,102 16%
Total 97,402 20,943 100% 39,584 100% 9,812 100% 8,085 100% 12,204 100% 6,774 100%
Source: US Census, as reported by Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission
22
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment I - Educational Attainment
US Census - Albemarle Countv
Summary table 2000 2005
% %
Population 25 years + 53,847 100% 57,291 100.0%
Less than hiClh school Clraduate 6,759 13% 5,901 10.3%
High school graduate (incl. equivalency) 9,591 18% 8,880 15.5%
Some college 11 ,822 22% 11 ,458 20.0%
Bachelor's degree, and up 25,675 48% 31 , 1 09 54.3%
100% 100%
http:// factfmder.census.gov / servlet/STTable? _bm=y&-
geo_id =05000US51 003&qr_name= ACS_2005_EST _ GOO_S 1501 &-ds_name= ACS_2005 _EST_ GOO_
For the 2005 American Community Survey, the US Census uses a point-estimate system. For the above
table there is a margin of error of 1.1 %, or + / -633 of 57,291 persons estimated.
23
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment J - Number of Companies versus Employment Growth
Employers & Average Employment by Company
(Covered Employment & Wages in Virginia)
Average
No. of
No. of Total Co u nty Employees
Year companies Employment Population / Company
1990 1 ,462 32,581 68,172 22
1993 1 584 29,167 18
1994 1685 29147 17
2000 2039 38249 19
2004 2,393 42,470 18
2005 45,256 90,400
2006 2,640 47,817 90,806 18
Ann ual Growth 3.8% 2.4% 1.8%
Source: VEC Annualized QCEW Employment data, cooper center demographics
http://www .coopercente r. org/dem ograp hics/sitefi Ie sid ocume nts/exce I/po pestim atesag esexrace/2 006ag esex .xl s
Employment by Size of Establishment
Employment by Size of Albemarle AC % of Virginia VA % of
Establishment Employees Total Em plo yees Total
0, no employment 11 0.0% 993 0.0%
1 to 4 em ployees 2,591 5.4% 195,701 5.4%
5 to 9 employees 3,084 6.4% 254,140 7.0%
10to 19 employees 4,288 8.9% 362,705 10.0%
20 to 49 employees 6,615 13.7% 597,679 16.4%
50 to 99 employees 4,532 9.4% 466,329 12.8%
100 to 249 employees 6,297 13.0% 571,754 15.7%
250 to 499 em ployees 4,025 8.3% 372,164 10.2%
500-999 employees *** *** 275,384 7.6%
1000 and ove r *** *** 541,838 14.9%
48,340 3,638,687
Source: VA Employment Commission (VEC)
Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages (QCEW), 3rd-Quarter (July, September, August), 2006
Note: Asterisks (***) indicate non-disclosable data.
24
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment K - Median Income per VA Income Tax Returns, 1999 to 2004
Adjusted Gross Income on Commonwealth of Virginia Individual Income Tax Returns
Median Adjusted Gross Income 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Ave. Ann.
All returns (combined) Growth
_ Charlottesville City $21,102 $ 22,403 $ 21 ,831 $ 21,903 $ 21 ,482 $ 22,675 1.4%
Albemarle County $ 33,175 $ 34,739 $ 34,636 $ 34,046 $ 34,383 $ 35,047 1.1%
~ Charlottesville MSA $ 27,739 $ 29,392 $ 29,428 $ 29,269 $29,172 $ 30,084 1.6%
State of Virginia $ 28,236 $ 29,539 $ 30,116 $ 30,203 $30,718 $ 31,780 2.4%
Married couple returns
Charlottesville City $ 47,239 $ 50,560 $49,716 $49,154 $ 48,340 $ 52,122 2.0%
Albemarle County $ 63,010 $ 66,175 $ 66,240 $ 65,629 $ 66,456 $ 69,452 2.0%
Charlottesville MSA $ 54,720 $ 57,783 $ 58,268 $ 57,964 $ 56,860 $ 59,660 1.7%
State of Virqinia $ 53,745 $ 56,530 $57,619 $ 57,924 $ 59,250 $62,109 2.9%
Source: Virginia Department of Taxation data on Cooper Center web site:
http://www.virginia.edu/coopercenter/vastat/incomelincome. htm I#AG I
Note: MSA was redefined in 2003
Of all 2004 returns Albemarle County median income was 110% of the State's; of the married-couple
2004 returns, Albemarle County was 111 % of the State's.
25
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment L - Median Household Income, Per US Census 2000
American
Community Ave. Ann.
Income Concept 2000 Census Survey, 2005 Growth
Median household income $ 44,356
Charlottesville City $ 31,007 not available
Albemarle County $ 50,749 $ 60,398 3.5%
Charlottesville MSA $ 44,356 $ 62,286
State of Virginia $ 46,677 $ 54,240 3.0%
Median family income
Charlottesville City $ 45,110 not available
Albemarle County $ 63,407 $ 77,297 4.0%
Charlottesville MSA $ 55,455 $ 47,543
State of Virginia $ 54,169 $ 65,174 3.8%
Source: US Census Bureau
Note: Area covered by MSA was changed in 2003, so data
are not directly comparable.
For the American Community Survey data, the margin of error is +/-$6,065 of the reported $60,398.
26
>-.
u
......
-
o
p.,
.......
I::
v
S
0..
o
-
v
;;.-
v
o
u
's
o
I::
o
u
~
v
....c:
.......
;...
~
rn
......
rn
>-.
-
ro
I::
~
ro
~
o
"0
v
~
"0
0..
~
t-
o
o
N
Q)
.....
<'l
.....
(/)
Q)
..s
o
.....
'"'Cl
Q)
~
Q)
'"'Cl
t::
.....
(/J
Q)
b[J
<'l
~
I
~
>< co <0 "t- o Ll) Ll) "t- O) "t- <0 0) C") ..... <0 "t- Ll) ..... CO 0
-2l "t' "t' C\j . CO Lei oS CO "'"' M M "'"' M C\j "t' . Lei Lei CO CO oS .
0) 0) 0) . CO ..... I"- 0 CO I"- CO 0 <0 <0 0) . ..... ..... 0 0 0) .
. . .
Ll) .s ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
0
0
N ...- ...- ...- O'l <"l Ll) ...- '<l" 0 <"l N ...- CO '<l" <Xl l"- I"- N Ll)
t.) I"- ; N . I"- :9l lB fil tb N N ~ 8 ~ fil . &3 ; O'l Ll) ~ .
?"- m . co o. ...- . N co .
<( . - ...- . ...- .
...- ...-
>< ~ ~ 8 ~ I"- ~ I"- ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ I"- Rl 0 l"- I"- ~ ~
-2l . ..... 0 ~ co ..... ..... 0 .
c::i c::i ...: . c::i ...: c::i c::i c::i c::i c::i c::i c::i ...: ...: ...: ...: ...: .
'<l" .s . ..... ..... ..... .
8
N ~ ~ I"- fil fB Ll)...- 0 ~ I"- ~ 0 fil g 0 <"l ~ 8 ~ ~
t.) <Xl . m<Xl ...- m '<l" '<l" l"- .
<( I"- '<l" m t co m <Xl'<l" co m m I"- <Xl m '<l" <Xl I"- '<l" N co 0 t
...-
>< Ll) C") 0) Ll) 0) 0) 0 O'l <0 ..... co co "t- co N I"- <0 <0 C")
-2l M C\j C . co C\j C\j co co "t' C\j to..: oS . Lei to..: C C to..: co C .
0) 0 ..... . co N coo I"- <0 co 0) <0 . l"- N ..... ..... 0 0 l"- .
<"l . . .
0 .s ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
0
N '<l" <Xl Ll) <Xl ...- ...- N N <"l ...- <Xl 0 ...- ...- <"l Ll) N '<l" Ll)
t.) m <"l <Xl . ...- I"- '<l"CO I"- ...- l"- Ll) m . I"- 0 '<l" ...- <Xl m 0 .
<( co '<l" m . co m <Xl'<l" Ll) <Xl m co <Xl . <"l <Xl I"- '<l" N Ll) l"- .
. . .
N <0 0 ..... "t- C")O N N C") co "t- Ll) "t- ..... N "t- N 0) N
1ii M ~ r-...: . 10 C'\j r-...:<Xi 10 C'\j ..... M 0) M C'\j r-...: c::i M c::i Lci r-...: .
"0 0) 0 0) . co ..... coo I"- <0 co O'l <0 <0 co N ..... N ..... 0 <0 .
s: ..... . ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .
~
0
N !D m 0 m Uli Uli$ <"l fB g l"- I"- fil ~ &3 N <"l g <"l Ll)
t.) N '<l" . <Xl I"- 0 '<l" N '<l" I"- '<l" .
co '<l" <Xl . Ll) <Xl <Xl'<l" Ll) I"- <Xl co <Xl <Xl <"l l"- I"- '<l" N Ll) co .
<( . .
>< ..... l"- N 0) Ll) NCO Ll) "t- ..... 0 co I"- C") "t- co 0) "t- <0
-2l ~ ...: ...: . :8 0) ~~ ~ ~ g r-...: ~ . ...: ~ C'\j <Xi c::i 8 r-...: .
. . .
0 O'l . ..... 0) . co ..... ..... ..... <0 .
...- .s ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
0
0
N I"- ...- co <"l ...- N ...- N co ...- co <Xl co Ll) Ll) ...- Ll) N ...-
t.) ~ ~ <Xl . fB lB &3; Uli l2 ~ g ~ . ~ ~ f2 ~ I"- Uli CD .
<( l"- . . N .
. . .
>< 0) C") "t- Ll) Ll) C")C") "t- Ll) ..... 0 C") I"- co <0 co Ll) N .....
-2l Lei C co t oS C r-....:~ Lei Lei Lei Lei Lei t Lei Lei M to..: co "'"' C t
0) ..... co . co N I"-N I"- "t- I"- 0) <0 . co C") ..... N ..... 0 l"- .
8 .s ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
0
N <Xl g ~ r::::. Ll) f8~ ~ N !:i Ll) ~ $ ~ Ll) <Xl ~ <"l Ll)
t.) '<l" . '<l" '<l" Ll) . l"- N 0 0 .
<( co '<l" l"- . Ll) <Xl I"-'<l" Ll) co l"- Ll) l"- . <"l I"- co '<l" N Ll) co .
. . .
1ii <0 co <0 <0 I"- Ll)C") <0 ..... Ll) 0) C") "t- co <0 ..... C") C") "t-
"t' "'"' "'"' . C, to..: coco to..: oS "t' M co . "t' Lei to..: "'"' M co M .
"0 O'l 0 0) . O'l ..... I"-N I"- "t- I"- co <0 . co N 0 N ..... 0) l"- .
8l .s ..... . ..... ..... . ..... ..... ..... ..... .
m
...- ...- m 0 I"- 0 I"- co co O'l m <"l <"l '<l" <Xl N Ll) '<l" co Ll)
t.) g ~ <"l . Uli m r::::. l"- i'!) ~ Ll) ~ N . N ~ CD ~ ~ ~ $ .
<( l"- . I"- '<l" co l"- . <"l .
. . .
ro
>< N Ll) <0 <0 ..... ....."t- Ll) ..... "t- C") <0 O'l I"- 0 0) co "t- I"- 'c
(]) 10 ~ ~ . ...: M ~8i g r-...: ~ ...: ~ . ~ ~ M ~ c::i Lci ~ . .~
~ . . .
0) . 0) ..... "t- o . ..... ..... 0) .
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... :>
<Xl ...- I"- co Ll) ...- ...-Ll) 0 co I"- co l"- N co co m l"- N m '0
8l t.) fB ~ ~ t N t! ~~ N I?; ~ N r::::. . I"- 0 ~ <"l ~ <"l fB . c:
Ll) Ll) Ll) . N I"- <"l '<l" . ro
...- <( . . . Q)
~
"t- N C") co "t- <0 <0 ..... N "'" Ll) C") Ll) ..... 0 C") co 0 co ro
1ii "t' oS M . to..: C\j "t'''t' C\j C to..: to..: "t' . M C\j M C\j C\j "t' oS . E
"0 . . . .!!1
0) 0) 0 . co ..... 1"-0 co <0 I"- 0) l"- . co N co 0 ..... 0) <0 .
I"- .s ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..c
8l <(
...- ~ f8 <"l ~ 8 <''IN ;; lB m Ll) ~ &3 ~ ; 0 ~ Ll) ~ ~
t.) l"- . mco ...- l"- . ...- 0 . .Q
<( Ll) <"l l"- . '<l" I"- Ll)<"l Ll) Ll) co '<l" co . N co '<l" <"l N '<l" Ll) .
. . . ro
ro
>< N N 0 "t- N CON Ll) CO Ll) 0 ..... 0 CO C") 0) "t-..... '0
(]) to..: M oS . co "'"' ~~ t c c co co . c co "'"' oS to..: oSM . -
. . .
"0 0) 0 ..... . CO ..... 1"-0 . <0 0) 0) l"- . 0) N CO 0) ..... COl"- . '0,
co s: ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... '6
m
m ~
...- <"l tB lB $ ~ (5l;~ ~ Ll) m ~ N ; C;; a; I"- 0 co 0
() N t . Ll) Ll) . m <"l 1"-...- . $:
<( Ll) <"l <Xl '<l" co Ll)<"l . Ll) co '<l" co . N co '<l" N N <"l Ll) . 0
. . . . ...- W
II t.)
1ii O'l <0 ..... <0 "t- COO) N I"- "t- <0 CO ..... Ll) <0 0) "t- COC") Q) 0
10 10 r-...: t r-...: 10 C'\j~ r-...: C'\j 10 M r-...: . <Xi c::i ...: Lci ~ ~~ . Ol t.)
"0 0) 0 0 CO 0 1"-0 I"- <0 0) 0) <0 . 0) C") CO 0 ..... CO l"- . ~ w
Ll) s: ..... ..... . ..... ..... . ..... ..... ..... . Q)
m . ~ >
m ~
...- ...- '<l" m co m I"- 0 <"l co 0 m N m ...- 0 l"- N Ll)m Q)
t.) fil ~ fe . <"l CD i'!)(5l; ; m Ll) 0 fB . g tb ~ g N ~~ . ro
t '<l" '<l" co '<l" t N t ~
<( U) 0
. (/)
Ol (/) t'l ,S
~ c: u E
'w > > '0
::> If) t'l If)
'0 0 -<
c: .<:: m > '0 .~
- Q) u (/) t'l (/) If) 0 c
>- (/) e:- m Q) 'c Q) Q) - - 0 :0 0
C en 'c > u CIl C Li... ::> ""
.~ s: u ii If)
Q) c CIl .~ '0 Q) c.. ~
~ Q) '0 CIl 0- Q) 0 E c:
0 en 0 c .~ CIl c. ;, ~ E en Q) If) c 0 X en
t.) ::> Li... t= 0 If) ~ Q) :~
'0 Q) ~ (/) m 8 ~ (l! 'ffi '0
Q) .S <Ii 0 ;, Q) '0 C c .9l c m t:: '0 rJf E Q)
16 .3 "" u m CIl 0 oa CIl 0 15 c CIl .9l 0 ~ '0 ""
<( u ~ 0 ~ Q) en 'w 06 0 <.) c E -< 'ill
(/) ::> .l!l (/) 13 If)
E a Ol .b 0- U W (/) C w E
Q) Q) (/) E c :5 .~ CIl
~ m c ~ (/) ::> (5 'ffi c .g! ~~ 0 Q;
.~ :s; c c c CIl m ::> m .@ :0 '0
'0 :;::; 0 CIl .<:: Q5 CIl .E s Q) e '0 Q) 8 .<:: ::> c
<e I- -< ~ ::) <.) ~ s: a::: ~ c Li... a::: c.. ~ -< W J: -< -< <5 c.. ::)
.....
t::
Q)
E
A
u
<'l
.....
.....
-<
t-
N
a.l
;.-
o
..0
<'l
(/J
l-<
o
.....
u
Q)
(/J
g
(/J
.g
.S
b[J
t::
:.a
t::
o
0..
(/J
Q)
l-<
l-<
o
U
Q)
..s
.S
'"'Cl
Q)
'"'Cl
.El
u
.S
Q)
l-<
<'l
<'l
.....
<'l
'"'Cl
Q)
b[J
<'l
~
.....
t::
Q)
E
t::
l-<
Q)
;.-
o
b[J
.-
<'l
U
o
.-
'"'Cl
t::
<'l
Q)
.....
<'l
.....
(/J
.-~
<'l
l-<
Q)
'"'Cl
Q)
~
v
.....
o
Z
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment 0 - Housing Affordability Gap
Of the Rental Units in Albemarle, 38% of Occupants Paid More than 30% of Their Income for the Rental Unit. This
Rate Is Higher than the State-wide Rate of34%.
Henrico
42%
Stafford
James City
Hanover
Albemarle
Virginia
% of Income for
Rent
<30% of Income
>30% of Income
Not computed
James
Virqinia Albemarle Hanover Henrico ~ Stafford
58% 55% 59% 63% 52% 63%
34% 38% 32% 33% 42% 32%
8% 7% 9% 5% 7% 6%
Source: US Census 2000 Table DP-4
Median Gross Rent Virainia Albemarle Hanover Henrico James City Staffo rei
Median Gross Rent in 1999 $650 $712 $686 $676 $703 $842
Median gross rent as a % of
household income in 1999 25% 26% 25% 24% 28% 24%
Source: USCensus 2000 Tables H63and H70
In 1999, 19% of the Albemarle County Home Owners Paid More than 30% of Their Monthly Income towards Housing
Costs
Henrico
22%
Stafford
James City
Hanover
Albemarle
Virginia
20%
29
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment R - Albemarle County Travel Expenditures
Year Occupancy Room Rate
This
AC % Chg Nafl % Chg State % Chg Year % Chg
1987 63.0 63.3 63.9 46.58
1~ 66.7 5.9 63.4 0.0 63.0 (1.4) 48.97 0:1
1-gs-9- 65.4 ( 1 :-9) 64.1 1.:':: o3~1 (0.0) 49.72 TI
If990 64.5 (1.41 63.5 (1.1 ) 60.5 (4.1) 56.08 12.8
1~91 60.6 (6.-0) 61.6 (2.8) 59.2 (2.0) 55.45 (r1)
11g92 61.9 L~1 62.2 1.1 60.4 2.0 06 TO
1993 67.6 9.2 63.1 1.4 62.0 2.8 58.28 4.1
1994 67.9 0.4 64.3 1.9 62.9 1.5 59.51 2.1
1995 67.9 0.0 64.6 0.4 62.5 (0.7) 61.33 3.1
1996 68.5 0.9 64.4 (0.3) 62.6 0.1 62.87 2.5
1997 67.0 (2.2} 63.9 (0.7) 62.5 0.1 68.1 8.v
~ 63.7 ( 411} 63.1 (1.1 ) o2~4 (0.1 ) 70.32 ~
1999 65.4 L7 62.6 (0.9) 62.0 (0.5) 73.18 4:-1
~ 65.6 0:3 63.1 0.7 o2~3 0.3 81.17 --,u:g
-ZOO 1 63.9 (2.-6) 59.7 (5.5) 59.1 (4.9) 83.63 -3.0
2002 63.9 (O.O~ 58.S (1.1 ) 59.4 0.4 80.7 (3.5)
12003 67.4 5.5 58.S 0.3 60.7 2.S 79.9 ( 1.0)
2004 69.6 3.1 61.1 3.7 62.0 2.0 80.8 1.1
12005 71.1 2.2 62.9 3.0 62.4 0.8 83.2 3.1
Ave An n. 0.7%
0.0%
-0.1%
3.3%
Source: Smith Travel Research, as reported to the Charlottesville-Albemarle Convention & Visitor's Bureau
Note: "AC" includes Albemarle County and City of Charlottesville hotels.
31
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment S - Taxable Sales and BPOL
2006 Taxable Sales, Albemarle No.o Amt. Per
NAICS Business Class Amount Dealers Dealer
o No NAICS info 132,453,509 164 807,643
111 Crop production 1,934,997 8 241,875
237 Heavy & Civil Engineering Construction 5,319,707 8 664,963
238 Spedaltv Trade Contractors 2,948,614 20 147,431
311 Food manufacturino 1,169,310 6 194,885
312 Beverage & tobacco Manufacturing 2,531,914 6 421,986
321 Wood Product manufacturing 2,692,863 6 448,811
323 Printing 2,285,058 9 253,895
327 Nonmetalli c mineral product ma nufacturin~ 1,854,489 5 370,898
332 Fabricated metal product manufacturing 3,319,480 7 474,211
334 Computer & Electronic Product Manufactu 779,222 7 111,317
339 Mise Manufacturing 8,991,436 28 321,123
421 Wholesalers, Durable Goods 1,618,794 8 202,349
423 Merchant wholesalers, durable goods 23,244,755 67 346,937
424 Merchant wholesalers, nondurable coods 4,282.606 10 428,261
425 Wholesale Electronics 4,601,722 6 766,954
441 Motor Vehicle & Parts dealers 30,333,407 26 1,166,670
442 Furniture & Home Furnishings 38,247,247 68 562,460
443 Electronics & Appliance Stores 19,771,265 26 760,433
444 Building Material, Garden, Supplies Deale 190,590,817 46 4,143,279
445 Food & Beverage Stores 176,473,816 69 2,557,592
446 Health & Personal Care stores 4,877,007 22 221,682
447 Gas Sta tions 22,835,633 35 652,447
448 Clothing & Clothing accessories 48,401,540 87 556,340
451 Sportinc, Hobbv, Book & Music Stores 35,680,333 119 299,835
452 General Merchandise Stores 169,605,599 22 7,709,345
453 Misc. Store Retailers 32,720,448 173 189,136
454 Nonstore Retailers 33,120,385 65 509,544
511 Publishing Industries 373,845 7 53,406
531 Real Estate 761,154 7 108,736
532 Rental & Leasing Services 23,652,398 211 112,097
541 Prof., Scientific, & Technical Svces 4, 900,646 58 84,494
561 Administrative Support Services 2,962,622 21 141,077
611 Educational Services 15,085,179 173 87,198
621 Ambulatorv Health Care Services 299.061 12 24,922
623 Nursinq and Residential Care Facilities 866,239 10 86,624
711 Perform ing Arts, Spectator Sports & Relat 38,975 8 4,872
713 Amusement, Gambling, & Recreation Indu 6,577,477 11 597,952
721 Accommodation 51,285,721 30 1,709,524
722 Food Services & Drinking Places 76,333,807 154 495,674
811 Repair & Maintenance 12,631,763 38 332,415
812 Personal & Laundry Services 1,778,361 45 39,519
813 Religious, Grantmaking, Civic, Profession 6,294,629 11 572,239
$1,206,527,850
Source: VA Dept ofTaxation, Calendar Year ending 12/31/2006
I The count of dealers represents active deal ers that reported taxable
sales during the reporting period I
32
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Continued ----- Attachment S - Taxable Sales and BPOL
Per Capita Taxable Sales Have Increased Comparably with the
Average of Peer Counties
ii)
Cii
.5
E
o
tIlZ
~-
III 0
1Il tIl
u"O
, s::
Q. III
tIl
:J
o
.s::
l-
e.
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
o
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
_ Albemarle _ Peer Avg
The County's per capita taxable sales have increased by approximately 50% between 1996 and 2006, an increase that is
better than that of the peer average (42%). Albemarle's per capita sales are consistently lower than the peer average,
however, perhaps because of the proximity of shopping opportunities in Charlottesville, and the fact that our region
contains a high number of students, many of whom do not live and shop in the area the entire year.
Source: Weldon Cooper Center, (http://www.virginia.edulcoopercenter/vastatltaxablesales/tax _ sales.html).
Population: Weldon Cooper Center, (http://www.coopercenter.org/demographics/POPULA TION%20ESTIMA TES/).
4 June 2007
Per Capita Nominal BPOL Tax Revenue Increased in 2006
Cll
:J
l::~
Cll~
>-
Cll III
c:: .S:
~ 8
g-z
u.!:
...-
Cll
Q.
110.00
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Per Capita Nominal Business License Tax Revenue in Albemarle County
Changes in the per-capita value of BPOL tax revenue gives a rough idea about the intensity of
business activity in a community. The higher the value of BPOL revenue per resident, the higher the
level of business activity that each resident "supports". In the case of Albemarle, this activity increased
by roughly 35.4% between 1996 and 2001 and increased by 27.9% in 2006 from 2003.
33
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment T - Deposits in Commercial Banks
Albemarle County Bank Deposits
Fiscal Year Bank Deposits Fiscal Year Bank Deposits Average Annual Gowth
1994 355,399 2000 423,676 94-00 3.0%
1995 357,490 2001 457,000
1996 354,604 2002 495,000
1997 377,117 2003 680,699
1998 365,453 2004 746,292
1999 417,626 2005 1 ,001 , 164 00-05 21.7%
(1,001,164-354,604) = .9877 /10 years = 9.87% 94-05 9.87%
http://www. albemarle.org/upload/images/forms center/departments/finance/forms/CAFR 2005. pdf
34
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment U - Building Value
Year New Residential New Non-Res & Alter. New Commercial & Farm Bldg, Alterations
No. Amt. ($) No. Amt. ($) No. Amt. ($) No. Amt. ($)
1990 665 61,802,696 921 15,342,542 26 7,910,736 255 11,869,356
1991 589 51,285,672 803 11,090,518 46 13,458,797 224 22,386,373
1992 739 78,81 0,454 807 20,146,386 55 14,067,365 272 11,376,911
1993 717 68,855,330 874 15,562,513 57 16,327,783 153 10,565,021
1994 666 87,244,515 865 17,700,080 47 14,017,368 216 17,311,228
1995 596 75,679,003 820 18,421,103 62 19,597,733 235 10042,333
1996 620 88,409,350 771 12,677,441 68 14,794,996 205 17,089,126
1997 707 101,181,621 838 .17,886,461 70 86,368,593 304 16,157,948
1998 704 113,548,623 883 21,082,938 78 39,265,010 318 33,339,817
1999 767 135,497,848 957 24,668,820 74 25,639,523 341 18,940,639
2000 649 115,980,335 870 30,553,776 79 36,701,250 306 21,051,626
2001 595 121,581,817 722 26,771,198 72 120,723,577 173 11,256,192
2002 840 219,612,245 810 32,666,405 62 32,161,180 206 20,801,458
2003 688 143,158,647 804 47,849,191 60 13,405,691 324 18,846,760
2004 581 146,326,941 745 29,461,560 52 222,397,227 298 10,780,837
2005 734 215,841,361 985 42,137,027 89 34,793,179 477 42,663,330
2006 513 175,167,104 987 45,203383 55 57,977,153 346 27,532,859
117,646,092
25,248,314
45,271,009
25,639,523
18,941,871
17,311,228
35
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment V - Land in Farms, Net Worth
Total Value of
Landin Livestock, Poultry
Farms Total Value of Ag and Their Products Net
Year Number of Farms (acres) Products Sold Sold Worth/Farm
1974 750 213,398 $10,376,000 $7,394,000 $13,835
1978 751 208,476 $18,173,000 $15,032,000 $24,198
1982 830 201,465 $21,892,000 $17,173,000 $26,376
1987 772 186,486 $19,072,000 $14,235,000 $24,705
1992 757 188,567 $21,841,000 $16,411,000 $28,852
1997 747 172,251 $21,400,000 $16,800,000 $28,648
2002 919 177,445 $19,100,000 $12,400,000 $20,783
Source: Census of Agriculture, Albemarle County
Farms by Value of Sales
Less than $1,000
$1,000-$2,400
$2,500-$4,999
$5,000-$9,999
$10,000-$19,999
$20,000-$24,999
$25,000-$39,999
$40,000-$49,999
$50,000-$99,999
$100,000-$249,999
$250,000-$499,999
$500,000 or more
Quantity
283
152
142
115
87
22
38
17
33
19
3
8
450,000
400,000
350,000
300,000
en 250,000
CI)
...
(.)
<( 200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
~------=------- --
~~~
i- ~- ~""--.-------* -. ~ --
N ..... ~ M = = ~~...... T-~. .
N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~
- -- ~-~~-M~----'o:I'.;,--"lI:t --co ------aT ~---ac--
N ~ M = - "lI:t it) it) "lI:t
~ ~ 0 ~ - = N ~
------~-~ N--~-~ -----=--N- ,....
~ ~ ..... .....
~ ~
1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1978 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002
36
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
W - Agricultural Statistics
Virginia Agricultural Statistics Service:
2002, Number 79, (published 9/2003)
Albemarle County standings. . ..
Farms 8th in acres,15th in number of farms
Ag products sold 35th
Ag products sold - livestock, poultry and their products 30th
Orchards 4th acres, 2nd farms
Apples 6th in bushels
Peaches (9 farms, acreage not specified) 14th in number of farms
All Hay 18th
Sheep 9th
Milk Goats 5th of 81 in number of farms
Angora Goats 3rd of 54 in number of farms, 15t in mohair production
Bees and Honey 13 (tied with 2 others) of 82 in number of farms, 42 of 46 in pounds of honey produced
Certified Organically Produced Commodities 7 farms in 2002 from 0 farms in 1997, 17th (tied with 4 other
counties) out of 72 counties with Certified Organically Produced Commodities farms
Virginia Agricultural Statistics Service:
2001 Virginia Equine Survey (published 12/02)
15t in inventory
VA dept of Agriculture and Consumer Services
2003 Grape Production
15t in tons produced and in bearing acres
Dept of Forestry
AVERAGE ANNUAL HARVEST VALUE (1986-2001)
Albemarle ranks 11 th with $4,960,986
37
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment X - Land Use, Albemarle County
Buildable Vacant Acres bv Growth Area. 1993
Growth Area VR LD MD HD NS CS RS OS IS ORS Total
Neighborhood 1 0 0 41 30 0 12 49 0 30 0 162
Neighborhood 2 0 600 75 25 4 45 0 14 0 0 763
Neighborhood 3 0 398 78 90 7 20 56 0 0 236 885
Neighborhood 4 0 719 36 42 0 0 0 0 225 0 1022
Neighborhood 5 0 307 37 103 12 10 40 2 0 0 511
Neighborhood 6 0 449 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 457
Neighborhood 7 0 122 0 38 0 0 0 4 0 0 164
Hollymead 0 190 0 127 10 30 77 65 709 0 1208
Crozet 0 640 154 0 12 15 0 0 214 0 1035
Piney Mountain 0 5 20 0 0 0 0 0 203 0 228
Rivanna 897 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 897
Eanysville 246 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 251
North Garden 972 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 977
TOTAL 2115 3430 441 455 58 132 222 90 1381 236 8560
Source: Albemane County Department of Planning and Community Development, 1993, using a planimeter
Legend VR - Village Residential CS - Community Service
LD - Low Density RS - Regional Service
MD - Medium Density OS - Office Service
HD - High Density is - Industrial Service
NS - Neiohborhood ORS - Office/Reoional Service
Buildable Vacant Acres bv Growth Area. 2005
Growth Area CS IS I ND NS OS O/RS RS TC T UD Total
Neighborhood 1 16.38 0.00 5.39 2.64 0.00 2.96 0.00 35.60 0.00 36.89 79.12 178.98
Neighborhood 2 35.82 0.00 10.22 338.14 2.41 7.36 0.00 3.24 0.00 0.00 127.45 524.64
Neighborhood 3 7.34 0.00 0.00 250.87 2.80 0.00 159.61 33.35 0.00 0.00 75.14 529.11
Neighborhood 4 49.19 31.79 33.50 207.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.43 93.34 424.31
Neighborhood 5 18.68 0.00 0.00 135.62 0.00 3.54 0.00 41.72 0.00 0.00 95.70 295.26
Neighborhood 6 155 0.00 64.99 277.73 7.69 12.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.11 368.16
Neighborhood 7 0.00 0.00 6.13 9.40 0.00 6.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.88 70.57
Hollymead 11.29 697.97 33.23 780.88 1.01 11.49 0.00 0.00 8.05 13.61 159.38 1,716.91
Piney Mountain 0.00 202.87 0.00 81.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 284.46
Rivanna Villaae 64.53 0.00 0.00 356.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 421.51
Total 204.78 932.63 153.46 2,440.91 13.91 43.60 159.61 113.91 8.05 59.93 683.12 4,813.91
Growth Area
Crozet
D
3.37
PFED
0.00
CT3
303.67
CT4
151.44
CT5
55.47
CT6
9.60
Source: Albemane Department of Community Development, 2007
Note: The figures listed above do not include land which is in the floodplain (100 Yr.) or has a slope
of 25% or greater. All acreages are based on GIS polygon acreage - not actual deeded acreage.
All parcels queried for this analysis have a buildinglimprovement value of $20,000 or less.
This query was based on end of year 2005 parcel and CAMA data.
CS - Community Service
IS - industrial Service
I - Institutional
ND - Neighborhood Density
NS - Neighborhood Service
OS - Office Service
O/RS - Office/Regional Service
RS - Regional Service
TC - Town Center
T - Transitional
UD - Urban Density
D - District
PFED - Potential Future Employment District
CT3 - Urban Edge [CT3]
CT4 - Urban General [CT4]
CT5 - Urban Center [CT5]
CT6 - Urban Core [CT6]
38
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Continued ----- Attachment X - Land Use
Analysis of Vacant Land Zoned LI
Albemarle County Acreaf[e for Lieht Industr Activity
Area Total IS Total LI Both IS & Vacant IS Vacant LI Vacant IS
LI &LI
Places 29 1,234 305 266 901 93 88
Crazet 37 124 17 4 64 3
Remaining 211 599 128 31 176 20
County
Total 1,481 1,027 411 935 333 III
County
1. IS = Industrial Service in the Comprehensive Plan, LI = Light industrial zoning
2. Acreage totals are based on GIS-mapped polygons
3. Any acres in the 100-year flood plain covered were subtracted out and are reflected in these totals
4. "Undeveloped" refers to building improvements values listed in CAMA greater than or equal to zero and less
than or equal to $20,000
End of year 2005 CAMA data was used for this analysis, compiled by GDS
39
2007 Updated Data Analysis for the Economic Development Policy
Attachment Y - 2006 Citizen's Survey
D:r:IZEl-LSATISEh.CJIQN$URVEY
Table.3-14~ ImpO-Itance and Satis-filcnonWitli-'Semces
. Importance I Satisfaction
i Score Rank Service % Rank
I
2.96 1 Pravide quality educatian far schaal children 88.0 ):4
2.94 2 I Pravide emergency rescue services 96.8 J1
2.94 3 Pravide fire pratectian c 95.4 '2
...
2.92 4 Pratect warer resaurces 79.4 )7
2.91 5 Provide palice pratectian (service) , .91.4 " .f9: ,.-:..
- .".'
2.88 6 Provide effective service to. aur custamers .' , 90.2 .11
2.87 7 Provide needed public facilities 92.5. . .-' 3..
2.86 8 Praviding fair praperty tax assessments 70.2 25
2.84 9 Maintain quality aflife deaJ.ing'with grawth and develapment 73.4 23
2.83 10 Praviding apparrunities far citizen input 81.3 16
2.80 11' Pravide needed infrastructure .., 75.9 21 ..
2.80 I 12 Ensure safety in business area 89.6 13
2.79 13 Pratect natural resaurces and environment 78.3 18
2.74 - 14 Suppart yauth pragrams 78.1 19
2.74 ..15 Manage grawth ill the caunty -,-- 55.p 32
2.73 I 16 Ensure safety at ar near residence 94.7 3
... -, I
2.73 17 Pravide pragl-amStahelpeldedy papulatian 85.0 15
2.73 18 Pravide library services 93.8 4
2.72 19 Pratect cOunty's rural character 65.7 283
2.71 20 Pravide services to. disadvantaged peaple 75.1 22
2.68 21 Make it easy to. get araund by car 71.0 .-.
24
2.68 22 Pravide recycling services 56.6 31
2.65 23. Pravide parks and recreatian.space 90.4 I 10'!
2.62 24 Ensure safety far walkers and bicyclists 68.0 27
2.58 25 Pramate develapment of affardable hausing .58.7 30 .
2.55 26 Assure econamic growthandjob apporrunities 76.8 20
2.51 27 Pravide suppart.far peap1e in financial need 69.7 26 -
2.50 28 Make it easy to use public transportation 55.2 33
2.48 29 Preserve historic buildings and places 93.5 5
2.48 30 Pravide learning opporrunities for adults 89.7 12 .1
2.48 31 Suppart affordable child care 65.4 29-.
2.28 32 Support cultural and entertainment apporrunities 91.7 8 ,
2.22 33 Pramote taurism in our area --.---- . ---- 92.7 i 6 .".
Center for Survey Research
29
40
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
POLICY
ADOPTED MARCH 1,1995
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
1996-2016
Attachment B
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY
Table of Contents
TH E POll C Y .................................................................................................................................................................. 2
THE POLICY:
Albemarle County has a strong economy. We have a growing population and labor force and
have experienced low unemployment rates. The labor force is skilled and well educated. Good
schools, good planning, and our quality of life are important factors in the County's current
economic position. Median incomes are higher than at the State and regional levels. A
consistently strong employer is present in the University of Virginia, which, as a major university
and medical center, offers great potential for associated research and development industry.
Other major employers and sectors continue to provide employment stability and diversity. The
renowned natural environment, Blue Ridge Mountain location, and historic resources of the area
provide a growing tourist trade as well as an attractive place to do business. The rural and
agrarian heritage contributes to this character, and also offers opportunity for agricultural and
forestry industries. These are the strengths of Albemarle County which this economic
development policy recognizes, and will seek to maintain.
Weare like other university communities in that we have an above average labor force
participation rate and above average number of part-time workers (both students and adults who
prefer part-time work). As a university community, we have a somewhat captive labor force as
well as people who live here for quality of life reasons, knowing that wages would be higher in
the more urban parts of the state. Weare a growing community with rising property values, and a
large share of our housing stock is new and priced accordingly. The high demand for both new
and used housing and the desirability of the community produce well above average housing costs
relative to wages paid by many employers. As we fine tune our community, we seek to maintain
a diversity of employment opportunities and to find ways to add housing for the lower half of the
incomes in our community. We also have residents who are poor, who are unable to work
regularly, or who work for minimum wage. Possible increases in the minimum wage nationally
would benefit those who continue to work in the minimum wage positions. Local efforts to
enhance skills and to develop the work force may also provide ways to move individuals out of
minimum wage jobs.
The purpose of this economic development policy is, first and foremost, to provide the local
citizenry an improved standard of living, improved job opportunities and competitive wages, and
work force development opportunities, rather than to seek to stimulate further population growth.
We do not seek growth, or to add new population, but accept that more people will move to our
community and that jobs, goods, and services will be needed to meet their needs. Accordingly,
the County will designate sites to address future growth needs in ways that will not detract from,
but will add to, the strengths of our community. We will provide information about those sites to
those who request it and attempt to answer all questions promptly and directly. We recognize our
position, along with the City of Charlottesville, as the center of the regional economy. We
recognize the economic objectives of the other localities in the region, while renewing our
commitment to our own economic development within the overall framework of our growth
management objectives. Albemarle County supports the Community Vision Statement regarding
economic development.
Note: "Business" and "industry" are intended to be inclusive and interchangeable terms, meaning
the commercial production and sale of goods or services.
2
-
.
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND STRATEGIES:
GOAL:
Maintain a strong and sustainable economy: 1) benefiting County citizens and
existing businesses and providing diversified economic opportunities; 2)
supportive of the County's Growth Management Policy and consistent with the
other Comprehensive Plan goals; and, 3) taking into consideration regional
(including the City of Charlottesville, and Greene, Louisa, Fluvanna, and Nelson
Counties) economic development efforts.
OBJECTIVE I:
Base economic development policy on planning efforts which support and
enhance the strengths of the County.
STRATEGIES:
1. Protect through diligent growth management efforts the County's distinctive natural and
man-made qualities to maintain its attractiveness as a place to live and work.
2. Continue to recognize the relationship of high quality schools and public services and an
outstanding level of natural and cultural amenities to positive economic development, and
maintain these attributes.
3. Encourage tourism focused on the rural, agrarian, and historical resources of the County,
and which does not threaten or compromise those resources.
4. Encourage agriculture and forestry by implementing when appropriate the
recommendations of the Agricultural and Forestal Industries Support Committee.
5. Recognize that the University of Virginia can provide important resources for business
and industry and work with the University and its associated entities to take advantage of
opportunities to benefit from this resource in innovative ways.
6. Compile data on County plans, zoning, sites, and policies, and make these available on
request.
7. Designate a contact point for information about the County.
8. Plan for the special needs, and utilize the talents, of the growing retired population
attracted to this area.
9. Encourage employment of the local labor force, rather than heavy reliance on relocated
workers.
10. Discourage business and industry which is not environmentally sustainable or friendly
(such as high water users, polluters).
11. Encourage diversity in business and industry which will accommodate a variety of
skill/educationallevels and provide for a diversified tax base.
3
";
12. Monitor and report to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors about the
volume of economic development activity and how that activity is fitting with the Goals,
Objectives and Strategies of the Comprehensive Plan.
OBJECTIVE II:
Plan for land and infrastructure to accommodate future business and
industrial growth.
STRATEGIES:
1. Assess the quality of areas designated for business and industry through analysis of the
site size variety, topography, location, and availability of infrastructure in such areas, and
compile an inventory of actual, useable land.
2. Designate areas for office, commercial and industrial development that meet the
development standards ofthe Comprehensive Plan and will provide sufficient land to meet
community needs through the next Comprehensive Plan revision. Provide enough land to
allow flexibility and choice without inviting sprawl or detracting from infill opportunities
in areas previously designated in the Plan.
3. Utilize the rezoning process and associated proffer allowances to address needs brought
about by new development and to provide the community with assurances about future
development activities.
4. Encourage infill development of business and industrial uses in areas appropriately
designated in the Land Use Plan.
5. Review current infrastructure (water, sewer, roads, community facilities) programs to
determine their impact on business and industrial development of designated areas.
Identify infrastructure improvements that will make Growth Areas work.
6. Continue to work with property owners in designated Growth Areas to identify
infrastructure needs, and promote good planning for development of such areas consistent
with County growth management strategies.
OBJECTIVE III:
Recognize the County's place in the regional economy.
STRATEGIES:
1. Cooperate through the TJPDC with other jurisdictions in the region, the University of
Virginia, and Piedmont Virginia Community College for:
Development of a coordinated economic data base;
Continuing discussion among the TJPDC jurisdictions about working and shopping
patterns, wage levels, job stability, work force development needs, housing
affordability, public services, tax burdens, and other topics which relate to the
4
.
.
purposes of local and regional economic development policy;
Distribution of information about development opportunities in the TJPDC to those
who request it;
Regional work force development;
Addressing linkages between housing and wages;
Evaluating local, regional, statewide, national, and worldwide economic trends to
determine the current and future economic stability of, and growth opportunities for,
different types of business and industry.
2. Support mutual consultation on regional development projects along shared borders,
and/or on projects of significance to more than one locality, possibly through a
"Memorandum of Understanding."
3. Recognize and seek to cooperate with the City of Charlottesville's economic development
objectives, and the objectives of the other counties in the Thomas Jefferson Planning
District, consistent with County goals, objectives, and strategies.
4. Measure our accomplishments in economic development against the strategic questions
posed in the Community Vision Statement regarding economic opportunity.
OBJECTIVE IV:
Consider fiscal impact as one indicator of positive economic development,
along with environmental impact and standard of living impact.
STRATEGIES:
1. Evaluate the fiscal impact of new business/industrial development.
2. Recognize that County residents place importance on job opportunities and economic
growth, but not at the expense of the protection and preservation of water quality and
quantity, natural resources, farmland, historic areas, and open space.
3. Recognize that the purpose of this economic development policy is to provide the local
citizenry an improved standard ofliving, improved job and wage opportunities, and work
force development opportunities, rather than to seek to stimulate further population
growth.
OBJECTIVE V:
Provide local business development opportunities.
STRATEGIES:
1. Support existing businesses and industries through an open door policy of communication,
and exchange of information and concerns.
2. Coordinate with existing entities that assist new small, locally-owned, and minority
5
.. .
,
,
businesses and micro-enterprises in their start-up and early operation efforts.
OBJECTIVE VI:
Provide work force development opportunities.
STRATEGIES:
1. Recognize that the most fundamentally sound work force is one that has basic education
and good work habits.
2. Encourage and support continuing educational and training programs to prepare the local
work force for the skill demands of current and future employers, including appropriate
work habits and life skills.
3. Encourage and support apprenticeship programs. Encourage the school system to teach
basic life skills as a means of preparing our future work force.
4. Develop related goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan (education, housing, day
care, transportation, etc.) to address barriers experienced by the local work force,
particularly those with greatest needs.
6
...
. .
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Preliminary Local Government FY 08/09 Budget
Overview
AGENDA DATE:
February 13, 2008
ACTION:
INFORMATION: X
SUBJECT/PROPOSALlREQUEST:
Work session to provide an overview of the FY
08/09 County Executive's Recommended Budget for
Local Government
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Foley, Wiggans; Ms. Vinzant
REVIEWED BY:
T
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
j
BACKGROUND:
The FY 08/09 budget calendar provides for a work session for the Board to receive a preliminary overview of the local
government budget recommendation from the County Executive.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal 5: Develop a comprehensive funding strategy/plan to address the County's growing needs.
DISCUSSION:
This work session will provide a preliminary overview of the County Executive's FY 08/09 Recommended Budget for Local
Government. Additional activities scheduled for the FY 08/09 budget process include:
. February 20 - Board of Supervisors Work Session - Preliminary School Division Budget Overview
· February 20 - Public Forum on Preliminary Budget Priorities
. February 29 - County Executive's Recommended FY 08/09 Budget and FY 08-12 Capital Improvements
Program (CIP) is distributed to the Board of Supervisors
. March 5 - Public Hearing on County Executive's Recommended Budget and CIP
· March 10- Board of Supervisors Work Session - Local Government
. March 12 - Board of Supervisors Work Session - School Division Operating and Capital Budgets
· March 17 - Board of Supervisors Work Session - FY 08-17 CIP
· March 19 - Board of Supervisors Work Session (if needed)
· April 2 - Public Hearing on Board's Proposed FY 08/09 Budget
· April 2 - Public Hearing on 2008 Calendar Year Tax Rate
· April 9 - Board Adopts FY 08/09 Operating and Capital Budgets
ATTACHMENTS
FY 08/09 Budaet Summary
..
County of Albemarle
FY 2008/09 Recommended
General Fund Budget
Embracing Our Value of Stewardship
~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Budget Calendar
1
Budget Summary
2
Total Budget Charts
5
General Fund Revenue Summary
7
General Fund Expenditure Summary
10
Department Budgets
Administration
Judicial
Public Safety
Public Works/General Services
Human Development
Parks, Recreation, and Culture
Community Development
Non-Departmental
13
16
18
21
22
25
26
28
Initiatives/Frozen Positions
29
BUDGET CALENDAR
February 13
Board of Supervisors Work Session - Preliminary Local
Government Budget Overview
February 20
Board of Supervisors Work Session - Preliminary School
Division Budget Overview
February 20
Public Forum on Preliminary Budget Priorities
February 29
County Executive's Recommended FY 08/09 Budget
and FY 08-12 Capital Improvements Program (C1P) is
Distributed to the Board of Supervisors
March 5
Public Hearing on County Executive's Recommended
Budget and C1P
March 10
Board of Supervisors Work Session - Local Government
March 12
Board of Supervisors Work Session - School Division
March 1 7
Board of Supervisors Work Session - C1P
March 19
Board of Supervisors Work Session
April 2
Public Hearing on Board's Proposed FY 08/09 Budget
and 2008 Calendar Year Tax Rate
April 9
Board Adopts FY 08/09 Operating and Capital Budgets
Building Our Budget - A look at the Critical Factors that
Shape Our Financial Plan
FY 08/09 TOTAL BUDGET
RECOMMENDED REVENUES
$331,442,514
FY 08/09 TOTAL BU DGET
RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURES
$331,442,514
Bond Proceeds
11%
Cen Govt Capital
& Debt
6%
School Capital &
Debt
14%
Special Revenue
4%
Fund Balance
1%
School Div.
Operations
43%
i
State Revenue
23%
School Self-
Sustaining
S%
Other Local
Revenue
21%
Overall HiQhlights:
~ The total Operating and Capital Budget is $331,442,514, an increase of $26 million
~ Proposed Operating Budget is $268.1 million, an increase of $ 5.5 million (2.1 %) over
FY 07/08
~ FY 08/09 Capital Budget is $49.1 million, an increase of $20.1 million (69.5%) over FY
07/08
~ The total Operating and Capital Budget increased 8.5% over FY 07/08
> The budget is built on the current real property tax rate of $0.68/$7 00 of assessed value.
> The budget allocates 60% of new local tax revenues to the School Division according to
established practice
> The budget funds increases in committed obligations like revenue sharing, compensation,
regional jail and courts with reductions in other operational areas to stay within minimal new
revenues
> The budget is focused on continuing the delivery of essential services, with no enhancements
to existing services except public safety priorities already identified by the Board of
Supervisors
> The budget reflects county reform and efficiency efforts - additional review will be ongoing in
the year ahead
> This budget reduces the transfer from the General Fund to the ClP from the equivalent of two
cents on the tax rate to one cent, however this reduction will not impact projects in the
proposed 5-year ClP
> The budget includes a 3.35% market increase in employee compensation
> This annual budget is developed under the guidance of the recently adopted Five Year
Financial Plan which helps set general direction, establish priorities to respond effectively to
long-range economic conditions and maintain the County's strong financial standing
> General Fund Budget Components
7. Department and community agency expenditures total $82.5 million, an increase of $2.0
million (2.5%) over FY 07/08
2. Transfer to the school division is $99.3 million, an increase of $0.9 million (0.9%) over FY
07/08
3. Transfer to capital and debt services is $24.9 million, a decrease of $0.8 million (-3.2%)
from FY 07/08
4. The revenue sharing agreement with the City of Charlottesville totals $73.6 million, a
3.2% increase from FY 07/08
2
Revenue Highliqhts:
. General property taxes, which include real estate and personal property taxes, are down 0.1 %
. Revenues reflect $1 million in funds from Emergency Medical Service (EMS) revenue recovery
program anticipated to begin in October, 2008
. Revenues reflect an overall increase of 1.6% in state funding for local government operations
. Revenues from the combined total of state and federal funding are down 2.8% for local
government operations
Reassessment Impacts
Effective for January 2008 the County completed its first annual real property tax
reassessment, in accordance with Virginia law that requires localities to assess property at 100% of
fair market value. Albemarle County has consistently ranked among the top jurisdictions in the state
in statewide Assessment/Sales Ratio studies conducted by the Virginia Department of Taxation.
The 2008 reassessments for the first time in recent memory reflect decreases in the value of a
majority of residential properties resulting from a weakening of the residential real estate market
being experienced locally as well as nationwide. The assessed value of commercial property, and the
value of Albemarle County land, on the other hand, has continued to increase, resulting in a slight
increase in overall assessed values, excluding new construction, measuring approximately fourteen-
hundredths of 1 % (0.14%).
This figure stands in stark contrast to the annual average rate of increase of 14.9% for the
previous biennial reassessment period. The increase is the average for all types of property, and the
results for different property types vary significantly from that number.
The value of previously-existing detached housing on parcels up to 5 acres, for instance,
declined on average by almost 2% (1.97%), while detached residential properties on parcels larger
than 5 acres actually increased in value, albeit at a minimal rate of four-one hundredths of 1 percent
(.04%). Attached housing declined in value more markedly, by 4%, as did the value of condominiums,
by 4.6%.
Continued strong demand for Albemarle County land resulted in an average 3.2% increase in
the assessed value of land, while the continued strength and attractiveness of the local economy is
reflected in an average 4.6% increase in the value of commercial property.
Expenditure Highlights:
This budget is responsive to current economic conditions created by the housing market slowdown,
with a 2.1 % increase over the current year's operating budget. The budget expenditures are focused
on meeting our commitments and obligations and continuing our delivery of essential services.
Responding to Commitments and Obligations
Growth in expenditures outlined in the budget are mainly attributable to funding for County
obligations and mandates that are due to either federal, state or local regulation or in response to a
policy direction or initiative that has previously been established by the Board. Outlined below are
those major obligations/commitments that require a substantial investment of new revenue beyond
what was budgeted in the current year.
Obliaation
School Division Funding Agreement
School Debt Service
Regional Jail Operations
Staffing for the Pantops Fire Station
Progress towards minimum police staffing standards
Revenue Sharing Agreement with Charlottesville
Increase
$0.9 million
0.7 million
0.5 million
0.5 million
0.5 million
0.4 million
3
Focus on Savings and Operational Efficiencies
In order to meet these obligations and still balance the budget within available revenues, significant
reductions have been made in county expenditures. Our focus on financial stewardship, while always
a critical aspect of our operations, will continue to receive very careful scrutiny as we respond to
changing economic conditions over the next year and beyond, with budget reform and operational
efficiency through thoughtful program and service reviews being the top priorities for local
government.
Expenditure Reduction
Transfer to Capital Projects
Frozen Positions
Eliminated/reorganized Positions
Operational Savings (vehicle and computer replacement, etc.)
Decrease/Savings
$1.5 million
0.7 million
0.3 million
0.5 million
Continued Delivery of Essential Services
Even in challenging financial times, County government is obligated to fulfill our value of stewardship
- the careful and responsible management of the things entrusted to our care - by ensuring the
continued delivery of essential services within available revenues. While this year's budget reflects
the reality of minimal new revenues, we are focusing available resources on those critical functions
that directly serve and protect our citizens and our environment while making the best use of our
financial resources. The following are some examples of how budget choices are supporting our
values:
Stewardship of our Community
. Four new police officers
. 12 new firefighters for Pantops station (hired in April 2009)
. Additional local funds are provided for Social Services to make up for a reduction in federal
funding
. 60% of new revenues are allocated to the School Division
. Funding is provided to approximately 50 community agencies, with average increases of 4%
from last fiscal year
Stewardship of Our Environment
. Continues $1.6 million in funding dedicated to the Acquisition of Conservation Easements
(ACE) Program
. Provides additional funding to support Byrom and Preddy Creek Parks
. Continues to provide $800,000 for the Storm Water Control Program
Stewardship of Our Financial Resources
. Total operating expenditures are kept to a 2.1 % increase from FY 07/08
. Increase in local government department operations are held below 2% on average
. Real estate tax rate is maintained at $0.68
Copies of the budget are posted on the website or can be obtained in CD format by
contacting the County Executive's Office at (434)296-5841. Visit the County website at
www.albemarle.org to download the budget or post comments or questions.
4
FY 08/09 TOTAL BUDGET
RECOMMENDED REVENUES
$331,442,514
Bond Proceeds
11%
Fund Balance
1%
Federal Revenue
4%
Property Taxes
40%
State Revenue
23%
Other Local Revenue
21%
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
AClUAL APPRO P ESll M ATE PROJECTED RECOMM REC-APP REC/ APP
Property Taxes $118,058,409 $135,275,353 $1 30,707,268 $135,154,890 $135,154,890 ($120,463) -0.1%
Other Local Revenue 63,800,995 64,211,418 64,174,696 68,119,418 68,119,440 3,908,022 6.1%
State Revenue 73,098,864 74,486,143 74,844,951 76,825,396 76,825,396 2,339,253 3.1%
Federal Revenue 14,337,043 14,858,468 13,543,911 13,870,237 13,870,237 (988,231) -6.7%
Fund Balance 2,556,587 1,017,221 39,968,928 1,921,546 2,449,551 1,432,330 140.8%
Bond Proceeds 16,285,187 15,561,000 30,076,274 35,023,000 35,023,000 19,462,000 125.1%
TOTAl, ALL FUNDS $288,137,085 $305,409,603 $353,316,028 $330,914,487 $331,442,514 $26,032,911 8.5%
5
FY 08/09 TOTAL BUDGET
RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURES
$331,442,514
Gen Govt Capital & Debt
6%
Special Revenue
4%
School Capital & Debt
14%
General Government
24%
Revenue Sharing
4%
School Self-Sustaining
5%
School Div. Operations
43%
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 $ %
ACTUAL APPROP ESTIMATE REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
General Govt Operations $67,249,672 $77,089,847 $77,182,137 $83,186,540 $78,781,410 $1,691,563 2.2%
School Div Operations 133,792,011 144,144,018 144,396,303 147,128,640 145,816,468 1,672,450 1.2%
School Self-Sustaining 14,031,385 14,854,196 15,183,730 16,125,489 16,125,489 1,271,293 8.6%
Special Revenue Funds 11 ,579,883 12,395,505 12,526,082 12,870,454 12,602,509 207,004 1.7%
Debt Service 13,778,672 14,721 ,044 14,721,044 15,351,534 15,351,534 630,490 4.3%
SUBTOTAL-OPERATING $240,431,623 $263,204,610 $264,009,296 $274,662,6S7 $268,677,410 $S,472,800 2.1%
Capital Projects 33,681,738 28,992,592 80.117,163 50,976,813 49,131,154 20,138,562 69.5%
Revenue Sharing 10,134,816 13,212,401 13,212,401 13,633,950 13,633,950 421 ,549 3.2%
TOTAL - ALL FUNDS 284,248,177 30S 409603 3S7,338860 339273 420 331,442 S14 26.032,911 8.S%
NOTE: Totals are net of transfers
6
FY 08/09 RECOMMENDED
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
$221,149,109
State Revenue
11%
Transfers
Federal Revenue 1%
2%
Fund Balance
0.2%
Other Local
Revenue
3%
Other Local Taxes
22%
Gen. Property
Taxes
61%
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 FY 07/08 FY 08/09 FY 08/09 FY09-FY08 FY09 / FY08
ACTUAL APPROP ESTIMATE PROJECTED RECOM M REC-APP REC/APP
General Property Taxes $118,073,019 $135,260.353 $130,707,268 $135,154,890 $135,154,890 ($105,463) -0.1%
Other Local Taxes 43,987,261 47,235.395 46,331,650 48,495.365 48,495.365 1.259.970 2.7%
Permits And Fees 1.348,609 1,462.450 1,438.300 1.734.600 1,734,600 272,150 18.6%
Fines And Forfeitures 494,194 378,850 529,200 549.300 549.300 170,450 45.0%
Use Of Money And Property 1,536.604 1.548,685 1.353,168 1,424,681 1,424,681 (124.004) -8.0%
Charges For 5ervlces 2.076.928 2,099,167 2,086,666 3,217,259 3,217,259 1.118,092 53.3%
Miscellaneous 4.047 8,400 7,037 8,300 8,300 (100) -1.2%
Payments In Lieu Of Taxes 64.827 74,278 80.952 82,278 82,278 8,000 10.8%
Do natio ns 5.800 5,800 9,800 5,800 5.800 0 0.0%
Recovered Costs 237,036 202876 285328 206,100 206100 3224 1.6%
LOCAL REVENUES $167,828,32S $188,276,2S4 $182,829,369 $190,878,S73 $190,878,S73 $2,602,319 1.4%
Payments In Lieu Of Taxes-State 94,496 105.000 107,000 108.000 108,000 3,000 2.9%
Non-Cate9orical Aid-State 15.623.828 15.611.579 15.619,352 15.531,470 15,531,470 (80,109) -0.5%
5hared Expenses.State 2.124.619 2,182,400 2,208,860 2.199.855 2,199,855 17,455 0.8%
Categorical Aid-State 5 550,478 5 841 .664 5 782 480 6291.226 6291.226 449 562 7.7%
Subtotal, State $23,393,422 $23,740,643 $23,717,692 $24,130,SSI $24,130,SSI $389,908 1.6%
Payments In Lieu OfTaxes.Federal 21,373 21.700 21,265 21,700 21.700 0 0.0%
Catego rical Aid'Federal 4609.328 5436,763 4122.641 4232.544 4232.544 (1 204219) .22.1%
Subtotal, Federal $4,630,701 $ 5,458,463 $4,143,906 $4,2S4,244 $4,254,244 ($1,204,219) -22.1%
STATE & FEDERAL REVENUES $28,024,122 $29,199,106 $27,861,S98 $28,384,79S $28,384,795 ($814,311) -2.8%
TOTAL REVENUES $195,852,448 $217,475,360 $210,690,967 $219,263,368 $219,263,368 $1,788,008 0.8%
Transfers 2,155293 1,364635 1.746102 1,474241 1,474,241 109.606 8.0%
REVENUES and TRANSFERS $198,007,741 $218,839,995 $212,437,069 $220,737,609 $220,737,609 $1,897,614 0.9%
Fund 8alance Appropriations: 0 297,221 2 369 590 0 411.500 114,279 38.4%
TOTAL REVS, TRANSFERS, FUND SAl.; $198,007,741 $219,137,216 $214,806,659 $220,737,609 $221,149,109 $2,011,893 0.9%
7
FY 08/09 GENERAL FUND REVENUES
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 FY 07/08 FY 08/09 FY 08/09 FY09-FY08 FY09 / FY08
ACTUAL APPROP ESTIMATE PROJECTED RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES
CURRENT:
Real Estate $97,284.286 $109,764,865 $106,448,218 $107.663,890 $107,663,890 ($2,100,975) -1.9%
Public Service 1.485,718 1.571.810 1,979,870 2,023,000 2,023,000 451,190 28.7%
Local Personal Property 16,809.812 21,165,000 20,150,000 23,000.000 23,000,000 1,835.000 8.7%
Machinery & Tools 660,942 694,400 627,280 642,000 642,000 (52,400) -7.5%
Mobile Homes 70.060 76.178 69,000 70,000 70,000 (6,178) -8.1%
Subtotal Current $116,310,818 $133,272,253 $129,274,368 $133,398,890 $133,398,890 $126,637 0.1%
NON-CURRENT:
Delinquent $886,286 $967,100 $682,900 $806.000 $806,000 ($161,100) -16.7%
Penalty 568,583 655,000 500,000 600,000 600,000 (55.000) -8.4%
Interest & Fees 307.332 366.000 250.000 350,000 350.000 (16,000) -4.4%
Subtotal Non-Current $1,762,201 $1,988,100 $1,432,900 $1,756,000 $1,756,000 ($232,100) -11.7%
SUB-TOTAL $118,073,019 $135,260,353 $130,707,268 $135,1 54,890 $13 5, 1 54,890 ($105,463) -0.1%
OTHER LOCAL TAXES
Penalty & Interest $108,888 $107,000 $103.500 $106.500 $106.500 ($500) -0.5%
Sales Tax 13,425,924 14,600,000 13,500.000 14,040,000 14,040,000 (560.000) -3.8%
Consumer Utility Tax 7,698,635 8,967.095 8,901,750 9,257.500 9,257,500 290,405 3.2%
Utility Consumption Tax 314,682 327,300 313,400 327,665 327,665 365 0.1%
Business License 10,078,061 9,744,500 10,211,000 10.596,500 10,596,500 852,000 8.7%
Short Term Rental 95,137 97,500 105,000 11 0,000 110,000 12,500 12.8%
Decals 2,293.001 3,775,000 3,500,000 3,775,000 3,775,000 0 0.0%
Bank Franchise 522,370 415,000 500,000 525,000 525,000 110.000 26.5%
Clerk Fees 2,901,178 2,717,000 2,617,000 2,820,000 2,820.000 103,000 3.8%
Transient Occupancy 727,627 735,000 805,000 837,200 837,200 102,200 13.9%
Food & Beverage Tax 5,438,399 5,575,000 5,575.000 5,800,000 5,800.000 225,000 4.0%
Audit Revenues 383,359 175.000 200.000 300.000 300.000 125,000 71.4%
SUB-TOTAL $43,987,261 $47,235,395 $46,331,650 $48,495,365 $48,495,365 $1,259,970 2.7%
PERMITS AND FEES
Inspection related fees $746.680 $813.500 $780,000 $936,000 $936,000 $122.500 15.1%
Other development fees 528,284 571,000 553,750 678,300 678,300 107.300 18.8%
Animal License 10.745 11.000 14,000 15.000 15.000 4,000 36.4%
Land Use 4,635 8.000 9.000 9.500 9.500 1,500 18.8%
Solicitors 270 300 300 300 300 0 0.0%
Fire/Rescue 49.583 51,650 66,250 79,500 79,500 27.850 53.9%
Courts 8.412 7.000 15.000 16,000 16,000 9.000 128.6%
SUB-TOTAL $1,348,609 $1,462,450 $1,438,300 $1,734,600 $1 ,734,600 $272,150 18.6%
REVENUE FROM THE USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY
Interest $890,169 $850,000 $725,000 $769,275 $769,275 ($80,725) -9.5%
Sale of Surplus 22,616 17,000 17,000 17,000 17.000 0 0.0%
Rent 623.819 681,685 611.168 638,406 638,406 (43,279) -6.3%
SUB-TOTAL $1,536,604 $1,548,685 $1,353,168 $1,424,681 $1 ,424,681 ($124.004) -8.0%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
Fees of Clerk $763,182 $850.000 $675.000 $750.000 $750,000 ($100,000) -11.8%
Police & Sheriff 656,545 587,405 645,700 667,235 667,235 79,830 13.6%
Administration Fees 242.525 254.312 276,916 292,774 292.774 38,462 15.1%
Parks & Recreation 302,727 288.500 304.000 312,900 312,900 24,400 8.5%
EMS Billing 0 0 0 1.000,000 1,000,000 1,000.000
Service & Sales 43,801 51,350 42.050 45,500 45.500 (5,850) -11.4%
Court Fees 68,147 67.600 143.000 148,850 148.850 81.250 120.2%
SUB-TOTAL $2,076,928 $2.099,167 $2,086,666 $3.217,259 $3,217,259 $1,118.092 53.3%
OTHER LOCAL REVENUE
Payments in lieu of taxes $64,827 $ 74,278 $80.952 $82.278 $82,278 $8,000 10.8%
Recovered cos ts 237,036 202,876 285.328 206,100 206,100 3,224 1.6%
Fines And Forfeitures 494,194 378.850 529,200 549.300 549,300 170,450 45.0%
Miscellaneous 4.047 8,400 7,037 8.300 8.300 (l00) -1.2%
Donations 5.800 5,800 9.800 5,800 5.800 0 0.0%
SUB-TOTAL $805,905 $670,204 $912,317 $851,778 $851,778 $181,574 27.1%
STATE REVENUES
Alcohol related $100.448 $100,448 $100,448 $0 $0 ($100,448) -100.0%
In Lieu of Personal Property 491,698 523,361 516,034 527,500 527.500 4,139 0.8%
PPTR 14,975,252 14.960.670 14,960,670 14,960.670 14,960,670 0 0.0%
SPCA Sterilization Fund 2,152 2.100 2,200 2.300 2,300 200 9.5%
Mobile Home titling 54,278 25,000 40,000 41,000 41.000 16.000 64.0%
Categorical Aid - Shared Expenses 2,124.619 2,182,400 2,208,860 2.199,855 2,199,855 17,455 0.8%
Cate90rical Aid 5.550,478 5,841,664 5,782,480 6,291.226 6,291.226 449,562 7.7%
Payments In Lieu Of Taxes-State 94,496 105,000 107,000 108,000 108,000 3.000 2.9%
SUB-TOTAL $23,393,422 $23,740,643 $23,717,692 $24,130,551 $24,130,551 $389,908 1.6%
8
FY 08/09 GENERAL FUND REVENUES
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 FY 07/08 FY 08/09 FY 08/09 FY09-FY08 FY09 / FY08
ACTUAL APPROP ESTIMATE PROJECTED RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
FEDERAL REVENUES
Categorical Aid $4.609.328 $5.436,763 $4,122.641 $4.232,544 $4,232,544 ($1.204,219) -22.1%
Payments In Lieu Of Taxes-Federal 21.373 21 ,700 21.265 21 ,700 21,700 0 0.0%
SUB-TOTAL $4,630,701 $5,458,463 $4,143,906 $4,254,244 $4,254,244 ($1,204,219) -22.1%
TRANSFERS & FUND BALANCE
Transfers $2,155,293 $1,364,635 $1,746,102 $1.474,241 $1,474,241 $109,606 8.0%
Fund Balance 0 297.221 2.369.590 0 411.500 114,279 38.4%
SUB-TOTAL $2,155,293 $1,661,856 $4,11 5,692 $1,474,241 $1,885,741 $223,885 13.5%
TOTAL $198,007,741 $219,137,216 $214,806,659 $220,737,609 $221,149,109 $2,011,893 0.9%
9
FY 08/09 RECOMMENDED
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
$221,149,109
Capital Projects
5%
Other
0.3%
\
Adm i nistration
5%
Judicial
2%
Public Safety
13%
Revenue Sharing
6%
Public Works
2%
Debt Service
7%
Human Development
9%
Tr to Schools
44%
Community
Development
4%
Parks & Recreation
3%
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 $ %
ACTUAL APPROP ESTIMATE REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
Administratio n $9,901,022 $10,935,341 $10,832,827 $11,430,113 $11,024,012 $88,671 0.8%
Judicial 3,483,981 3,741,011 3,801,780 3,922,912 3,852,578 111,567 3.0%
Public Safety 25,772,744 28,583,068 28,599,921 32,259,026 29,917,200 1,334,132 4.7%
Public Wo rks 3,615,612 4,464,688 5,499,072 4,975,795 4,673,265 208,577 4.7%
Human Development 16,198,798 18,500,343 1 7,088,540 19,722,022 18,836,558 336,215 1.8%
Parks & Recreation 5,683,544 6,121,821 6,128,352 6,524,879 6,323,251 201 ,430 3.3%
Community Development 7,075,264 8,128556 8,551 535 8,298371 7,834842 (293,714) -3.6%
SUBTOTAL $71,730,965 $80,474,828 $80,502,027 $87,133,118 $ 82 ,461 ,706 $1,986,878 2.5%
Tr to 5chools $91,165,717 $98,433,401 $95,432,007 $100,667,738 $99,355,566 $922,165 0.9%
Tr to Debt Service 13,202,724 14,163,343 14,163,343 14,843,747 14,843,747 680,404 4.8%
Tr to Capital Projects 18,141,923 11 ,630,664 11,148,451 11,961,299 10,115.640 (l ,515,024) -13.0%
Revenue 5haring 10,134,816 13,212,401 13,212,401 13,633,950 13,633,950 421 ,549 3.2%
Refunds 182,577 146,590 146,590 169,500 169,500 22,910 15.6%
Contingency Reserves 0 1,075,989 1,156,079 638,400 544,000 (531,989) -49.4%
Othe r 180,600 0 67,200 50,000 2 5 ,000 25,000
5UBTOTAL $133,008,357 $138,662,388 $135,326,071 $141,964,634 $138,687,403 $25,015 0.0%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $204 739.322 $219137216 $215828099 $229 097 752 $221 149.109 $2011 892 0.9%
10
GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 FY 07/08 FY 08/09 FY 08/09 $INC %INC
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
ADM I N ISTRA TION
Board of Supervisors $498,923 $500.355 $510,355 $538,620 $529,699 $29,344 5.9%
County Executive 1,485,579 1,582,003 1.645,411 1,626,795 1,486,373 (95,630) -6.0%
Human Resources Department 909.770 992,574 896,229 1,010,202 916.869 (75,705) -7.6%
County Attorney 711,800 849,237 799,767 908,266 906,986 57,749 6.8%
Finance Department 3,778,285 3,914,046 3,868,199 4,145.842 4,041,892 127,846 3.3%
Information Technol09Y Department 2.143,779 2,638,330 2,616,000 2.712,439 2,655,164 16.834 0.6%
Voter Registration & Elections 372,887 458,796 496.866 487.949 487,029 28,233 6.2%
Total $9.901,022 $10,935,341 $10,832,827 $11 ,430,11 3 $11,024,012 $88.671 0.8%
JUDICIAL
Clerk of the Circuit Court $641.416 $701,674 $701,674 $745,488 $734,588 $32,914 4.7%
Commonwealth Attorney 845,771 885,262 889,062 900,449 899,049 13,787 1.6%
5heriff 1,878,483 1,979,662 1.979,662 2,034,312 1,978.032 (1,630) -0.1%
Circuit Court 95.806 94,852 94,852 103.030 102,176 7,324 7.7%
General District Court 18,988 20,000 20,000 20.000 19,100 (900) -4.5%
Magistrate 3,517 5.450 12,368 4,800 4,800 (650) -11.9%
juvenile Court 0 54,111 104,162 114,833 114,833 60,722 112.2%
Total $3,483,981 $3,741.011 $3,801,780 $3,922,912 $3.852,578 $111,567 3.0%
PUBLIC SAFETY
Police Department $11.606,375 $12,264,040 $12,142,277 $13,222,737 $12,813,190 $549,150 4.5%
Fire/Rescue Department 5,334,324 6,476,437 6,593,921 8,144,297 7.101,770 625,333 9.7%
Volunteer Fire/Rescue 1,469,653 1,672,553 1,672,553 2.250,914 1,687,828 15,275 0.9%
TjEMS 21,184 21.184 21.184 21.820 21,184 0 0.0%
Forest Fire Extinction 12,587 13,216 13,216 13,216 13,216 0 0.0%
City Fire Contract 655.609 600,565 600,565 655,000 655,000 54,435 9.1%
Inspections 1.175,286 1.216.907 1,216,907 1,268,309 1,058,535 (158,372) -13.0%
Emergency Communications Center 1,693.054 2,028,770 2,028,770 2,008.069 2,008,069 (20,701) -1.0%
Regional jail 2,600,417 2.812.915 2.834.047 3,347.030 3,347,030 534,115 19.0%
Community Attention Home 54,070 57.314 57.314 66.298 60.149 2,835 4.9%
Fire/Rescue Tax Credit 48.962 42,000 42,000 50,430 50,430 8,430 20.1%
juvenile Detention Home 790.061 1,037,318 1,037,318 769,767 769,767 (267,551) -25.8%
Offender Aid Restoration 143.419 150.527 150,527 156,839 155,382 4,855 3.2%
SPCA Shelter Contribution 167,744 189.322 189,322 284,300 175,650 (13,672) -7.2%
Total $25,772,744 $28,583.068 $28,599.921 $32,259.026 $29,917,200 $1,334,132 4.7%
PUBLIC WORKS
General Services $3.519,338 $3.414,508 $3,799,644 $3,776,798 $3,515,460 $100,952 3.0%
R5WA Contribution 0 400,000 1,050,000 355,269 400,000 0 0.0%
Faciiities Development 96,274 650,180 649,428 843,728 757,805 107,625 16.6%
Totai $3,615,612 $4,464,688 $5,499,072 $4,975,795 $4,673,265 $208,577 4.7%
HUMAN SERVICES
50cial Services $9,658,412 $11,416.476 $9,954,673 $12,078,003 $11.434,730 $18,254 0.2%
Health Department 858,023 921,773 921.773 945.603 938,097 16,324 1.8%
Region Ten 497,749 566,276 566,276 566,276 566.276 0 0.0%
AIDS Support Group 4,452 4.719 4,719 5,861 4,861 142 3.0%
American Red Cross 0 0 0 2,940 0 0
ARC Infant Development Program 7,910 8.543 8.543 9,226 8,970 427 5.0%
ARC Ready to Learn 0 0 0 12,000 0 0
Boys & Girls Club 12,720 13,483 13,483 30,000 13.887 404 3.0%
Boys & Girls Club Capitai 0 0 50.000 0 0 0
BRMC - Latino Lay Health Promoter 5.459 5,787 5,787 10,000 5,613 (174) -3.0%
Computers 4 Kids 9,300 9,765 9,765 20,500 20,253 10.488 107.4%
Commission on Children & Families 219.507 236,708 236,708 264,997 250,292 13,584 5.7%
CYFs 86,785 91.864 91,864 124,582 97,614 5,750 6.3%
Focus - Teensight 28.395 28.395 28,395 30,099 0 (28,395) -100.0%
Teen Pregnancy Programs 0 0 0 0 28,395 28,395
Free Clinic 8,658 9,351 9,351 10,285 9,819 468 5.0%
jABA 261,102 267,900 267.900 339.357 277.107 9.207 3.4%
JAUNT 622.579 704,382 704,382 725,492 725,492 21,110 3.0%
Legal Aid 35.481 36,900 36,900 39,852 38,494 1,594 4.3%
Madison House 9,144 9.876 9,876 10,666 10.370 494 5.0%
Music Resource Center 5,976 6,335 6.335 7,500 6,335 0 0.0%
Northwestern Va. Health Systems 0 0 0 4,723 0 0
Piedmont Workforce Network 17,840 0 0 13,805 0 0
Piedmont CASA 6,900 8.500 8.500 9.370 8,925 425 5.0%
SARA 24,494 23,000 23,000 24,000 23,690 690 3.0%
SHE 78.516 82,082 82,082 103,616 89,974 7,892 9.6%
Tax Relief for the Elderly/Disabled 406,009 678,638 678.638 678.638 678,638 0 0.0%
United Way Centro de Ayuda 0 12,500 12,500 13,000 12,875 375 3.0%
United Way Child Scholarship 94,936 102,531 102,531 106,632 106,632 4,101 4.0%
Urban Vision 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 25,220 (780) -3.0%
UVA Museum of Art 0 0 0 5,000 0 0
Youth Motorsport Academy 0 0 0 50,000 0 0
Bright Stars Transfer 672,681 706,529 706.529 794.092 794,092 87,563 12.4%
II
GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 FY 07/08 FY 08/09 FY 08/09 $INC %INC
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/ APP
Comprehensive Services Act Trans 2,517,709 2,494,649 2,494,649 2.636,432 2,636,432 141,783 5.7%
Piedmont Va. Community College 22,060 27.381 27,381 23.475 23,475 (3,906) -14.3%
Total $16,198,798 $18.500,343 $17,088,540 $19.722,022 $18,836,558 $336.215 1.8%
PARKS & RECREATION/CULTURE
Parks & Recreation Department $2,243,037 $2,326,345 $2,332,876 $2,415,058 $2,321,163 ($5,182) -0.2%
Darden Towe Memorial Park 126,508 151,087 151,087 1 51 ,704 151,682 595 0.4%
J-M Regional library 2,756,270 3,041,270 3,041,270 3,218,242 3,173.138 131,868 4.3%
African American Festival 3.000 0 0 3.000 3,000 3,000
Albemarle Charlottesville Historical Society 0 0 0 3.150 0 0
Albemarle County Fair 10,000 0 0 0 0 0
Ashlawn Highland Festival 9,220 9,773 9.773 11.000 10,164 391 4.0%
Charlottesville Marathon 0 0 0 6,000 0 0
Discovery Museum 11,263 11.613 11,613 11,978 11,978 365 3.1%
First Night Virginia 0 0 0 5,000 0 0
Heritage Repertory Theater 0 0 0 5.000 0 0
Jeffersonian Thanksgiving Festival 0 0 0 5.000 0 0
Lewis and Clark Festival 3,500 0 0 0 0 0
literacy Volunteers 21,803 25,100 25.100 28,865 26,355 1,255 5.0%
Municipal 8and 16.500 17,490 17,490 19,000 18,190 700 4.0%
Paramount Theater 0 0 0 10,000 0 0
Piedmont Council of the Arts 11,585 12,206 12.206 17.520 12,594 388 3.2%
Save the Fireworks 10,000 10,000 10.000 12.000 10,000 0 0.0%
Virginia Festival of the 800k 11,150 11,500 11.500 12.300 11,960 460 4.0%
Virginia Film Festival 15.000 15,750 15.750 18.250 16,380 630 4.0%
Visitor's Bureau 424,796 476.181 476,181 545,721 545,721 69.540 14.6%
WHTJ Public TV 4,956 5,253 5,253 5,516 5,463 210 4.0%
WVPT Public TV 4,956 5,253 5,253 5,575 5,463 210 4.0%
WVfF Radio IQ 0 0 0 15.000 0 0
Zona Latina 0 3,000 3,000 0 0 (3,000) -100.0%
Total $5,683,544 $6,121.821 $6,128,352 $6,524,879 $6,323.251 $201,430 3.3%
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Community Development $4,892,067 $5.520,116 $5.575,933 $5,562.148 $5,227.954 ($292,162) -5.3%
Office of Housing 760.970 838,492 1,134,101 797,893 794.958 (43,534) -5.2%
VPI Extension Service 159,896 193.241 193,241 195,445 195,445 2,204 1.1%
Soil & Water Conservation 85,175 85,834 87.387 95.921 95.921 10,087 11.8%
AHIP 427,699 400,315 400,315 473,973 416.328 16,013 4.0%
Alliance for Community Choice in Transporti 0 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 0 0.0%
CTS - 8us Contract 367,374 666.248 686,248 678,372 678,372 12,124 1.8%
CVSBDC 5,000 7,500 7,500 10,000 7,800 300 4.0%
MACAA 176,464 186,748 186,748 196.829 1 79,060 (7,688) -4.1%
Piedmont Housing Alliance 93.542 109,035 109,035 127,382 113,396 4,361 4.0%
Planning District Commission 97,077 104,127 104,127 113,092 108,292 4,165 4.0%
Planning District Transit Authority Plan 0 0 50,000 0 0 0
Streamwatch 10.000 10,400 10,400 10,816 10,816 416 4.0%
Charlottesville Comm. Design Center 0 0 0 30,000 0 0
Total $7.075,264 $8.128,556 $8.551.535 $8,298,371 $7,834,842 ($293,714) -3.6%
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
City/County Revenue Sharing $10,134,816 $13.212.401 $13,212,401 $13,633,950 $13,633,950 $421,549 3.2%
Refunds 182.577 146,590 146,590 169,500 169.500 22.910 15.6%
Total Rewards 0 0 (15,000) 50,000 25,000 25,000
Suspense Accounts (13,200) 0 0 0 0 0
Transfer to School Operations 91,165,717 98,433.401 95,432,007 100,667.738 99,355,566 922,165 0.9%
Transfer to 5chool Debt Service 11,272,942 12.234,074 12.234,074 12.913,103 12,913,103 679,029 5.6%
Transfer to School CIP 503,000 1,098,000 1,098,000 1,000,000 1 ,000,000 (98.000) -8.9%
Transfer to General Govt. CIP 16,988.923 9.807,664 9,325,451 10.161,299 8,315,640 (1,492,024) -15.2%
Transfer to Storm Drainage 650,000 725,000 725,000 800,000 800,000 75,000 10.3%
Transfer to General Govt. Debt 5ervice 1,929,782 1,929,269 1,929.269 1.930,644 1.930,644 1,375 0.1%
Transfer to Veh icle Replacement Fund 193,800 0 82,200 0 0 0
Contingencies 0 1.075,989 1,156.079 638,400 544,000 (531,989) -49.4%
Total $133,008.357 $138,662,388 $135,326,072 $141,964,634 $138,687,403 $25,015 0.0%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $204,739,322 $219,137,216 $215,828,099 $229,097,752 $221,149,109 $2,011,892 0.9%
12
ADMINISTRATION FUNCTIONAL AREA
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP ESTIMATE REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $193,586 $187,820 $187,820 $194,628 $194,628 $6,808 3.6%
BENEFITS 63,098 64,178 64,178 75,293 68,532 4,354 6.8%
OPERATING 242,149 248,357 258,357 268,699 266,539 18,182 7.3%
CAPITAL 90 0 0 0 0 0
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $498,923 $500,355 $510,355 $538,620 $529,699 $29,344 5.9%
PERSONNEL 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 0.0 0.0%
Salaries: Includes 3.35% salary increase and an increase of $2,750 in overtime, bringing the total overtime budget to $3,000. This is based on
Clerk and Deputy Clerk attendance at Board meetings outside of normal work hours.
Operating Expenses
- Cost for audit increased $5,250, or 5%
_ Advertising expenses up $12,000, or 33%. This is based on added legal requirements in notices and reflects projections for the current year.
COUNTY EXECUTIYE (includes Community Relations and Management & Budget)
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/ APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $1,050,439 $1,131,839 $1,131,839 $1,177,316 $1,077,925 ($53,914) -4.8%
BENEFITS 300,110 323,359 353,359 340,754 313,203 (10,156) -3.1%
OPERATING 127,151 125,805 159,213 108,725 95,245 (30,560) -24.3%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 7,879 1,000 1,000 0 0 (1,000) -100.0%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $1,485,579 $1,582,003 $1,645,411 $1,626,795 $1,486,373 ($95,630) -6.0%
PERSONNEL 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.0 (0.5) -3.4%
Salaries: Includes 3.35% salary increase and the savings from OMB reorganization.
Benefits: Reduction reflects the savings from the OMB reorganization.
Operating Expenses
- Reduction of funding for ACE publicity from $22,000 to $11,000
- Elimination offunds for eCivis ($17,000)
- Reduction of $5,000 in Community Relations advertising to reflect actual advertising costs
- Reduction of $1 ,000 in OMB travel & training to reflect actual and planned travel
HUMAN RESOURCES
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/ APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $133,114 $169,738 $95,744 $148,360 $104,251 ($65,487) -38.6%
BENEFIT5 57,107 76,055 58,704 79,939 61,192 (14,863) -19.5%
COUNTYWIDE BENEFITS 231,803 236,369 236,369 311,982 283,915 47,546 20.1%
OPERATING 34,599 40,760 35,760 36,345 35,145 (5,615) -13.8%
CAPITAL 14,765 0 0 0 0 0
TR TO SCHOOLS 438,381 469,652 469,652 433,576 432,366 (37,286) -7.9%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $909,770 $992,574 $896,229 $1,010,202 $916,869 ($75,705) -7.6%
PERSONNEL 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0* 0.0 0.0%
*NOTE: The Organizational Development Specialist position is currently frozen, bringing the funded personnel count down to 2.0
Salaries: Includes 3.35% salary increase and the frozen Organizational Development Specialist position
Benefits: Reduction reflects the frozen Organizational Development Specialist position
Countywide Benefits: The main item in this category is early retirement. The requested number includes all employees who submitted applications
for FY 08/09. The recommendation is based on the assumption that 90% of those that submitted an application will actually retire in FY 08/09.
Transfer to Schools: The reduction is due mainly to lower personnel costs allocated to the General Government
13
ADMINISTRATION FUNCTIONAL AREA
COUNTY ATTORNEY
FY 06/07 FY07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $528,340 $622,007 $583,412 $671,141 $671,141 $49,134 7.9%
BENEFITS 149,357 182,021 171,146 198,396 198,396 16,375 9.0%
OPERATING 32,149 38,504 38,504 38,729 37,449 (1,05 5) -2.7%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 1 954 6,705 6,705 0 0 (6,705) -100.0%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $711,800 $849,237 $799,767 $908,266 $906,986 $57,749 6.8%
PERSONNEL 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 0.0%
Salaries: Includes 3.35% salary increase and funding the new assistant county attorney position for a full year.
Benefits: Increase reflects funding the new assistant county attorney position for a full year.
Operating Expenses: Reflects elimination .of one-time costs associated with new attorney position plus marginal baseline increases
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $2,466,769 $2,583,289 $2,549,801 $2,750,339 $2,688,136 $104,847 4.1%
BENEFITS 821,024 861,874 848,515 921,258 893,861 $31,987 3.7%
OPERATING 479,182 460,303 461,303 467,805 457,525 ($2,778) -0.6%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 11,310 8,580 8,580 6,440 2,370 ($6,210) -72.4%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $3,778,285 $3,914,046 $3,868,199 $4,145,842 $4,041,892 $127,846 3.3%
PERSONNEL 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0. 0.0 0.0%
.NOTE: Tax Clerk and Office Associate positions are currently frozen, bringing the funded position total down to 49.0
Salaries: Includes 3.35% salary increase, the impact of Finance reclassifications that occurred during FY 07 j08 and two unfunded positions - Tax
Clerk and Office Associate. Includes an increase of $7,000 in part-time wages to provide assistance during peak tax seasons.
Capital Outlay: Reduction in motor vehicle replacement fee from $3.00 per gallon to $1.50 per gallon of fuel.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/ APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $1,317,146 $1,466,510 $1,446,841 $1,504,138 $1,475,223 $8,713 0.6%
BENEFITS 417,921 461,668 455,767 486,556 473,356 11,688 2.5%
OPERATING 383,404 644,552 647,792 656,145 654,985 10,433 1.6%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 25,308 65,600 65,600 65,600 51,600 (14,000) -21.3%
C1P OPERATING IMPACT 0 0 0 0 0 0
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $2,143,779 $2,638,330 $2,616,000 $2,712,439 $2,655,164 $16,834 0.6%
PERSONNEL 23.0 23.0 23.0 23,0 23.0. 0,0 0.0%
.NOTE: An Office Associate position is currently frozen, bringing the funded position total down to 22.0
Salaries: Includes 3.35% market increase and one frozen Office Associate position
Capital Outlay: Includes funding for hardware ($31,600) and software ($20,000) not tied to major capital projects. Funding for software is reduced
$10,000 from FY 07 j08.
14
ADMINISTRATION FUNCTIONAL AREA
BOARD OF ELECTIONS
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $199,000 $222,301 $222,301 $239,690 $239,690 $17,389 7.8%
BENEFITS 57,772 78,515 78,515 84,579 84,579 6,064 7.7%
OPERATING 116,864 142,980 1 56,480 163,680 162,760 19,780 13.8%
CAPITAL OUTLAY (750) 15,000 39 570 0 0 (1 S ,000) -100.0%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $372,887 $458,796 $496,866 $487,949 $487,029 $28,233 6.2%
PERSONNEL 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 0.0 0.0%
Salaries: Includes 3.35% market increase, an increase of $4,000 in overtime wages as a result of the presidential election, and the addition of
$1,000 in part time wages to assist with absentee voters for the presidential election.
Operating Expenses
_ $6,500 increase in repair and maintenance of voting machines. The presidential election will require al11 06 voting machines to be in service. In
addition, 69 of the older voting machines will need to be upgraded and 55 machines will need to have replacement back-up power batteries.
- Other increases due to the presidential election include $2,500 in Other Purchased Services, $2,500 in Postal Services, and $6,500 in Office
Supplies. These amounts are based on increases from previous presidential elections.
15
JUDICIAL FUNCTIONAL AREA
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPEN DITU RES
SALARIES $396,639 $448,841 $448,841 $469,674 $469,674 $20,833 4.6%
BENEFITS 136,489 162,501 162,501 174,129 174,129 11,628 7.2%
OPERATING 89,884 87,832 87,832 99,185 90,785 2,953 3.4%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 18,405 2,500 2,500 2,500 0 (2,500) -100.0%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $641,416 $701,674 $701,674 $745,488 $734,588 $32,914 4.7%
PERSONNEL 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.0%
Salaries: Reflects 3.35% increase in current salaries, however, actual salary increase will be determined based on approved State budget.
Operating Expenses:
_ Includes County's computer maintenance charge for twenty computers which had previously been funded through contracted services (increase of
$600). There will be offsetting revenue from the Clerk's Technology Trust Fund for this expense.
_ Postal services increased $1,620 (49%) as a result of the judge entering three year dismissal orders which must be mailed to all parties. (This will be
an on-going activity/expense.)
COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $638,365 $661,516 $665,316 $672,800 $672,800 $11,284 1.7%
BENEFITS 177,901 191,696 191,696 194,077 194,077 2,381 1.2%
OPERATING 29,505 32,050 32,050 33,572 32,172 122 0.4%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $845,771 $885,262 $889,062 $900,449 $899,049 $13,787 1.6%
PERSONNEL 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0%
Salaries: Reflects 3.35% increase in current salaries
Operating Expenses: Decrease in maintenance charges for data processing equipment and small increases in telecommunications, office supplies, and
copy expenses based on historic expenditures
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $1,246,535 $1,277,358 $1,277,358 $1,316,217 $1,316,217 $38,859 3,0%
BENEFITS 359,506 384,142 384,142 387,106 387,106 2,964 0,8%
OPERATING 186,035 222,412 222,412 236,409 221,849 (563) -0.3%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 85,039 89,110 89,110 87,940 46,220 (42,890) -48.1%
OTHER 1,367 6,640 6,640 6,640 6,640 0 0.0%
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $1,878,483 $1,979,662 $1,979,662 $2,034,312 $1,978,032 ($1,630) -0.1%
PERSONNEL 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 0.0 0.0%
Salaries: Reflects 3.35% increase in current salaries.
Operating Expenses: Decrease In maintenance charge for data processing equipment
Other: Funds to provide local match for grants received during the year (bullet proof vest, etc.)
Capital Outlay:
- Reduction in motor vehicle replacement fee from $3.00 per gallon to $1.50 per gallon of fuel.
_ Includes $7,500 in extra expense resulting from anticipated replacement of three vehicles. (Vehicles will be purchased through the Vehicle
Replacement Fund.) Extra expenses includes painting, striping, and fees to remove and reinstall equipment, etc.
16
JUDICIAL FUNCTIONAL AREA
COURTS
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
CIRCUIT COURT $95,806 $94,852 $94,852 $103,030 $1 02,1 76 $7,324 7.7%
GENERAL DI5T. COURT 18,988 20,000 20,000 20,000 19,100 (900) -4.5%
MAGISTRATE 3,517 5,450 12,368 4,800 4,800 (650) -11.9%
JUVENILE COURT 0 54,111 104,162 114,833 114,833 60,722 112.2%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $118,311 $174,413 $231,382 $242,663 $240,909 $66,496 38.1%
NET COST $118,311 $174,413 $231,382 $242,663 $240,909 $66,496 38.1%
PERSONNEL 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0%
Circuit Court
Salaries: Reflects 3.35% market increase for 1.0 FTE and additional $1,640 for part-time law clerk during school year and full time in summer.
Operating Expenses: Small increases in several line items to bring them in line with historical expenditures.
General District Court
- Reduction of $900 reflects decrease in capital outlay approved in FY 07/08 .
Magistrate - Decrease based on City estimate.
Juvenile Court - The County's share of Juvenile Court expenses is anticipated to increase $60,722. This includes an increase of $2,548 (4.7%) for court
operations and an additional $58,174 for anticipated expenses associated with occupancy of the new Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court in January
2009. This expense also includes maintenance and utilities associated with the adjacent parking deck structure.
17
PUBLIC SAFETY FUNCTIONAL AREA
POLICE DEPARTMENT
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $7,295,116 $7,750,226 $7,671,649 $8,043,927 $7,999,429 $249,203 3.2%
BENEFITS 2,373,948 2,548,107 2,518,698 2,693,479 2,676,140 128,033 5.0%
OPERATING 1,349,026 1,311,338 1,328,324 1,363,115 1,327,515 16,177 1.2%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 550,887 636,090 604,286 638,020 325,910 (310,180) -48.8%
DEBT (TRANSFERS 37,398 18,279 19,320 18,279 18,279 0 0.0%
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES 0 0 0 465,917 465,917 465,917
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $11,606,375 $12,264,040 $12,142,277 $13,222,737 $12,813,190 $549,150 4.5%
PERSONNEL 147.5 149.5 149.5 153.5 '153.5 4.0 2.7%
. .. . . . .
'NOTE: A half-time Civilian Patrol ASSistant and full time Animal Control OffICer position are currently frozen, bringing the funded pOSition total
down to 152.0
Salaries:
_ 3.35% salary increase and reflects the reduction in funding for 1.5 frozen positions
_ $25,000 increase in overtime (which was funded by reallocation of available operating funds) to be more in line with actual historic overtime
expenditures
Operating:
_ Reflects reallocation of $25,000 in operating expenses to overtime
- Decrease in maintenance charges for data processing equipment
- Increase of $40,057 (11%) in vehicle fuel
Capital Outlay:
_ Includes $69,800 in capital outlay for essential police equipment including helmets, vests, communication equipment supplies, and firearm
replacement
_ Reflects the reduction in the motor vehicle replacement fee from $3.00 per gallon to $1.50 per gallon of fuel and elimination of one-time
capital items associated with previous year's strategic initiative
Strategic Initiative: 4.0 Police Officers of which $177,000 are one-time costs
FIRE/RESCUE DIYISlON
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $3,167,304 $4,058,478 $4,058,478 $4,258,607 $4,258,607 $200,129 4.9%
BENEFITS 1,088,107 1,365,281 1,365,281 1,508,709 1,508,709 143,428 10.5%
OPERATING 971,655 990,113 1,099,999 849,649 835,799 (154,314) -15.6%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 107,257 62,565 70,163 62,085 28,655 (33,910) -54.2%
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES 0 0 0 1,465,247 470,000 470,000
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $5,334,324 $6,476,437 $6,593,921 $8,144,297 $7,101,770 $625,333 9.7%
PERSONNEl 75.0 80.0 80.0 99.0 92.0 12.0 15.0%
Salaries: Includes 3.35% salary increase and an increase of $57,758 (22%) in overtime.
Operating: Decrease in maintenance charges for data processing equipment and eliminates one-time costs associated with previous year's
strategic initiative
Capital Outlay:
_ Includes $2,000 for replacement of projectors and bulbs in Training Division
_ Reflects reduction in motor vehicle replacement fee from $ 3.00 per gallon to $1.50 per gallon of fuel
_ Includes $3,000 in extra expense associated with the replacement of one vehicle in Fire Prevention which will be purchased through the
Vehicle Replacement Fund. Extra expense includes painting, striping, and removal/installation of equipment, etc.
Strategic Initiative: 12 personnel for Pantops Station beginning in April 2009 of which $234,500 are one-time costs
18
PUBLIC SAFETY FUNCTIONAL AREA
OTHER FIRE/RESCUE SERVICES
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
VOLUNTEER FIRE/RESCUE $1,469,653 $1,672,553 $1,672,553 $2,250,914 $1,687,828 $15,275 0.9%
TJ EMS 21,184 21,184 21,184 21,820 21,184 0 0.0%
FIRE/RESCUE TAX CREDIT 48,962 42,000 42,000 50,430 50,430 8,430 20.1%
FOREST FIRE EXTINCTION 12,587 13,216 13,216 13,216 13,216 0 0.0%
CITY FIRE CONTRACT 655,609 600,565 600,565 655,000 655,000 54,435 9.1%
TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS $2,207,994 $2,349,518 $2,349,518 $2,991,380 $2,427,658 $78,140 3.3%
Volunteer Fire/Rescue: Overall 1.1% increase to volunteer fire/rescue operating budgets. The Charlottesville-Albemarle Rescue Squad's
contribution (which is calculated based on percentage of calls ran in the County) is decreasing $9,652 due to a decrease in the percentage of
calls for service in the County during CY 2007. On average, contributions to other volunteer fire/rescue departments' operating budgets are
increasing 2.2%. Overall, support for volunteer fire rescue agencies is increasing 0.9% which includes a decrease in maintenance charges for
data processing equipment and a $7,700 increase in property, liability, and automobile insurance premiums.
Fire Rescue Tax Credit: Increase based on historic usage of tax credit program
City Contract: Recommendation based on 5% increase in base annual payment and receiving the maximum call load credit
INSPECTIONS & BUILDING CODES
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPEN DITU RES
SALARIES $822,668 $854,086 $854,086 $876,028 $736,330 ($117,756) -13.8%
BENEFITS 272,808 277,360 277,360 305,155 251,924 (25,436) -9.2%
OPERATING 47,076 50,766 50,766 53,436 53,436 2,670 5.3%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 32,734 34,695 34,695 33,690 16,845 (17,850) - 51.4%
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES 0 0 0 0 0 0
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $1,175,286 $1,216,907 $1,216,907 $1,268,309 $1,058,535 ($158,372) -13.0%
PERSONNEL 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 *17.0 0.0 0.0%
*NOTE: A Civil Engineer, Engineering Technician, and a Senior Civil Engineer position are currently frozen bring the funded position total down
to 14.0
Salaries: Includes 3.35% salary increase and removes funding for 3 frozen positions
Benefits: As a result of the 3 frozen positions, benefit costs are reduced 9.2%.
Operating Expenses: Increase of $2,500 in Books & Subscriptions to purchase building code updates which are published every three years
Capital Outlay: Reflects reduction in motor vehicle replacement fee from $3.00 per gallon to $1,50 per gallon of fuel
19
PUBLIC SAFETY FUNCTIONAL AREA
PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBUTIONS
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/ APP
EXPENDITURES
ECC $1,693,054 $2,028,770 $2,028,770 $2,008,069 $2,008,069 ($20,701) -1.0%
Regional jail 2,600,417 2,812,915 2,834,047 3,347,030 3,347,030 534,115 19.0%
juvenile Detention Home 790,061 1,037,318 1,037,318 769,767 769,767 (267,551) -25.8%
SPCA 167,744 189,322 189,322 284,300 175,650 (13,672) -7.2%
OAR 143,419 150,527 150,527 156,839 155,382 4,855 3.2%
Community Attention 54,070 57,314 57,314 66,298 60,149 2,835 4.9%
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRIBU' $ 5,448,766 $6,276,166 $6,297,298 $6,632,303 $6,516,047 $239,881 3.8%
ECC: The County's share of ECC is decreasing due to additional entities participating in the 800 MHz radio system which allows maintenance
costs of the system to be spread out.
Regional jail: The County's share of the Regional jail expenses is increasing 19.0%, The County continues to see an increase in the percentage
of inmate population attributable to the County. In addition, the jail's FY 08/09 budget is increasing 6.1 % primarily due to an increase in salary
and benefits, addition of maintenance costs for 800 MHz radios, and an increase in expenses tied directly to inmate population (health services,
food supplies, etc.). These two factors contribute to the projected increase for the County.
juvenile Detention Center: The County's share of the juvenile Detention Center is decreasing 25.8% due to a slight decrease in the projected
use of beds for FY 09 and a decrease in the percentage of County use as a result of an additional locality participating in the facility.
SPCA: The FY 08/09 recommended funding is decreasing 7.2% and is based on the established funding formula between Albemarle County
and the SPCA. The County also anticipates receiving $2,300 in State revenue for animal sterilization. This amount is also included in the
SPCA's FY 09 recommendation.
OAR: OAR is increasing 3.2% based on the following scores from the ABRT: Exemplary - Pretrial Services and Local Probation; Solid - Re-entry
Services, Drug Court, Criminal justice Planner, and Restorative justice
Community Attention: Community Attention is increasing 4.9%. This increase provides a 4% increase over the prior year funding and the
County's share of an increase in the new foster parent stipend
20
GENERAL SERVICES AND PUBLIC WORKS FUNCTIONAL AREA
GENERAL SERYICES ..
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $1,422,409 $1,173,868 $1,173,868 $1,208,766 $1,208,766 $34,898 3.0%
BENEFITS 524,341 424,477 425,229 472,949 472,949 48,472 11.4%
OPERATING 1,543,461 1,776,312 2,180,296 1,894,571 1,827,370 51,058 2.9%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 29,127 39,851 20,251 36,845 6,375 (33,476) -84.0%
INITIATIVES 0 0 0 163,667 0 0
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $3,519,338 $3,414,508 $3,799,644 $3,776,798 $3,515,460 $100,952 3.0%
PERSONNEl* 30.S0 30.S0 30.S0 32,00 30.50 0.00 0.0%
* Includes Storm Water Manaaement
Salaries: Includes 3.35% market increase
Operating Expenses:
-Decrease in maintenance charges for data processing equipment
-An increase of $44,800 for cost of upfitting and leasing new storage facility (total cost $70,000 for FY08/09). An offsetting transfer from the
Capital Fund will fund this expense.
-An increase of $60,000 (10%) in utility costs for local government buildings
-Additional $9,000 in repair and maintenance supplies and $6,100 in janitorial supplies based on prior year expenditures
-Contracted Services for landscaping and median mowing recommended at previous service levels and does not include funds for expanded
service levels initiated during FY 07/08
-Stormwater Contract Services were reduced $85,000. It is anticipated that there will be a sufficient balance available at the end of FY 07/08 to
reappropriate and, with the $50,000 recommended for FY 08/09, provide the necessary funding to maintain the current level of service.
Capital Outlay: Reduction in motor vehicle replacement fee from $3.00 per gallon to $1.50 per gallon of fuel
FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/ APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $63,084 $461,006 $461,006 $544,046 $544,046 $83,040 18.0%
BENEFITS 19,735 150,983 150,231 174,974 174,974 23,991 15.9%
OPERATING 12,684 28,352 28,352 39,695 33,035 4,683 16.5%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 771 9,839 9,839 11,790 5,750 (4,089) -41.6%
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES 0 0 0 73,223 0 0
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $96,274 $650,180 $649,428 $843,728 $757,805 $107,625 16.6%
PERSONNEl 8.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 8.00 0.00 0.0%
Salaries:
- 3.35% market adjustment
_ Full year impact of three position reclassifications (Director, Capital Projects Manager, and Office Associate) which occurred as a part of the
creation of the Office of Facilities Development when its function was diverged from General Services.
Benefits: Benefits increased due to the increase in salaries as noted above.
Operating Expenses: Increasing 16.5% and includes the following:
_ $1,200 increase in Books & Subscriptions to obtain LEED reference manuals and estimating guides
_ $3,400 increase in TravelfTraining to maintain continuing education hours needed for PE, enable staff to obtain LEED-AP professional
designation, and miscellaneous industry topics including building information modeling
Capital Outlay:
_ Reduction in motor vehicle replacement fee from $3.00 per gallon to $1.50 per gallon of fuel
_ Funding for 3 Palm Pilots ($3,600) for project managers who frequently work in the field
21
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA
SOCiAl SERVICES
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REOUEST RECOMM REC-APP RECI APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $4,099,455 $4,673,668 $4,084,183 $4,846,188 $4,846,188 $172,520 3.7%
BEN EFITS 1,344,403 1,569,398 1,370,729 1,649,701 1,649,701 80,303 5.1%
OPERATING 4,163,710 5,093,480 4,446,549 4,927,481 4,911 ,861 (181,619) -3.6%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 50,844 79,930 53,212 63,590 26,980 (52,950) -66.2%
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES 0 0 0 591,043 0 0
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $9,658,412 $11,416,476 $9,954,673 $12,078,003 $11,434,730 $18,254 0.2%
REVENUES
STATE $2,335,200 $2,553,969 $2,531,871 $3,030,742 $3,030,742 $476,773 18.7%
FEDERAL 4,507,122 5,336,763 3,987,283 4,200,204 4,200,204 (1,136,559) -21.3%
TRANSFER FROM SCHOOLS 184,756 186,136 194,200 1 88,795 188,795 2,659 1.4%
REVENUE TOTAL $7,027,077 $8,076,868 $6,713,354 $7,419,741 $7,419,741 ($657,127) -8.1%
NET COST $2,631,335 $3,339,608 $3,241,319 $4,658,262 $4,014,989 $675,381 20.2%
PERSONNEL 97,2 99,2 99,2 107.7 97,2 (2,0) -2,0%
NOTE: This total does not include transfers to CSA or Bright Stars.
Salaries: Includes 3.35% market increase, reclassifications that will occur in FY 07/08 and the elimination of two positions (Mental Health/Substance Abuse
Worker and Senior Employment Services Worker)
Operating Expenses:
_ $400,000 decrease in Aid to Dependent Children - Foster Care. This is 100% reimbursable and is offset by an equivalent reduction in revenues.
_ $232,699 increase in assistance for families who adopt special needs and at-risk children. This is 100% reimbursable and is offset by an equivalent
increase in revenues.
Capital Outlay: Reduction in motor vehicle replacement fee from $3.00 per gallon to $1.50 per gallon of fuel
Revenues: Revenues are decreasing for three main reasons. 1) loss of federal funding for the Family Support program of approximately $300,000 from the FY
07/08 budget; 2) a change in the way we are reimbursed for rent, resulting in a decrease of approximately $ 70,000; and 3) a change in the reimbursement
rates for service pass-thru funding.
BRIGHT STARS
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/ APP
EXPENDITURES
Salaries $656,405 $705,159 $715,825 $759,419 $759,419 $ 54,260 7.7%
Benefits 252,885 285,785 292,925 329,831 329,831 44,046 15.4%
Operating 48,806 51,917 51,917 55,049 55,049 3,132 6.0%
Capital Outlay 1,806 700 700 700 700 0 0,0%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $959,903 $1,043,561 $1,061,367 $1,144,999 $1,144,999 $101,438 9.7%
REVENUES
Poison Prevention $4,783 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Virginia Preschool Initiative 249,295 249,295 267,101 257,389 257,389 8,094 3.2%
Tr from Schools 87,737 87,737 87,737 93,518 93,518 5,781 6.6%
Tr from Gen Fund 672,681 706,529 706,529 794,092 794,092 87,563 12.4%
REVENUE TOTAL $1,014,496 $1,043,561 $1,061,367 $1,144,999 $1,144,999 $101,438 9.7%
PERSONNEL 17,8 17,8 18.5 18,5 18,5 0,7 3.9%
Salaries & Benefits: Includes the 3.35% market increase and a teaching assistant at Red Hill. The remainder of the Red Hill Bright Stars program is funded in
the Schools' budget.
Revenues:. The state revenue for FY 08/09, while an increase over the FY 07/08 budget, is actually a decrease of $9,713 from the FY 07/08 revised budget.
This is due to the discontinuation of the grant funding the TA at Red Hill and a change in the County's composite index.
The program at Cale that started in the current year as part of the Preschool Initiative Pilot is not currently funded in FY 08/09.
22
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA
CSA
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
Mandated Services $5,862,560 $6,722,030 $6,722,030 $7,187,410 $7,187,410 $465,380 6.9%
Non-Mandated Services 5,372 121,312 121,312 121,312 121,312 0 0.0%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $5,867,932 $6,843,342 $6,843,342 $7,308,722 $7,308,722 $465,380 6.8%
REVENUES
State Categorical $2,878,011 $3,308,693 $3,308,693 $3,632,290 $3,632,290 $323,597 9.8%
School Fund Transfer 1,040,000 1,040,000 1,040,000 1 ,040,000 1,040,000 0 0.0%
General Fund Transfer 2,517,709 2,494,649 2,494,649 2,636,432 2,636,432 141,783 5.7%
REVENUE TOTAL $6,435,720 $6,843,342 $6,843,342 $7,308,722 $7,308,722 $465,380 6,8%
Increases in CSA costs continue to rise due to two trends. First is the aging up of the CSA population. Due to the extremely complex needs of these older
children, they require placement where the cost of care is significantly higher. The second factor leading to cost increases is unregulated vendor rates.
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ACENCIES
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/ APP
EXPENDITURES
Aids Support Group $4,452 $4,719 $4,719 $5,861 $4,861 $142 3.0%
American Red Cross 0 0 0 2,940 0 0
ARC - Infant Development 7,910 8,543 8,543 9,226 8,970 427 5.0%
ARC - Ready to Learn 0 0 0 12,000 0 0
BRMC - Latino Lay Health 5,459 5,787 5,787 10,000 5,613 (174) -3.0%
Boys & Girls Clubs 12,720 13,483 13,483 30,000 13,887 404 3.0%
CYFS 86,785 91,864 91,864 124,582 97,614 5,750 6.3%
Commission on Children & Families 219,S07 236,708 236,708 264,997 250,292 13,584 5.7%
Charlottesville Free Clinic 8,658 9,351 9,351 10,285 9,819 468 S.O%
Computers 4 Kids 9,300 9,765 9,765 20,500 20,253 10,488 107.4%
Focus - Teensight 28,395 28,395 28,39S 30,099 0 (28,395) -100.0%
Teen Pregnancy Programs - Contingency 0 0 0 0 28,395 28,395
jABA 261,102 267,900 267,900 339,357 277,107 9,207 3.4%
JAUNT 622,579 704,382 704,382 725,492 725,492 21,11 0 3.0%
Legal Aid justice Society 35,481 36,900 36,900 39,852 38,494 1,594 4.3%
Madison House 9,144 9,876 9,876 10,666 10,370 494 5.0%
Music Resource Center 5,976 6,335 6,335 7,500 6,335 0 0.0%
Northwestern Virginia Health Systems 0 0 0 4,723 0 0
Piedmont CASA 6,900 8,500 8,500 9,370 8,925 425 5.0%
Piedmont Virginia Community College 22,060 27,381 27,381 23,475 23,475 (3,906) -14.3%
Piedmont Workforce Network 17,840 0 0 13,805 0 0
Region Ten 497,749 566,276 566,276 566,276 566,276 0 0.0%
SARA 24,494 23,000 23,000 24,000 23,690 690 3.0%
SHE 78,516 82,082 82,082 103,616 89,974 7,892 9.6%
Tax Relief 406,009 678,638 678,638 678,638 678,638 0 0.0%
Tj Health District 858,023 921,773 921,773 945,603 938,097 16,324 1.8%
United Way - Child Care Scholarships 94,936 102,531 0 106,632 106,632 4,101 4.0%
United Way - Centro de Ayuda 0 12,500 12,500 13,000 12,875 375 3.0%
Urban Vision 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 25,220 (780) -3.0%
UVA Art Museum 0 0 0 5,000 0 0
Youth Motorsports Academy 0 0 0 50,000 0 0
TOTAL AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS $3,349,995 $3,882,689 $3,780,158 $4,213,495 $3,971,304 $88,615 2.3%
ABRT Recommendations: The ABRT recommendations are by PROGRAM, not by agency. For existing programs, the following applies:
Exemplary - 5%
Solid - 3%
Adequate - 0%
Poor - (3%)
New programs must receive a score of "5olid" or "Exemplary" to be considered for funding. Programs that have been "Adequate" for multiple years can be
considered for defunding, Programs that have been "Poor" for two years can be considered for defunding.
Commission on Children & Families: Recommending a 4% increase over prior year funding and full funding of County's share of rent increase. Not
recommending funding for half-time Youth Development Network Coordinator position which was funded in FY 07/08 with funds from the Charlottesville
Department of Social Services.
23
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA
Computers 4 Kids: The increase is due to recommended funding for a new program - Computer Clubhouse. Funding is contingent on C4K receiving adequate
funds from other sources. Computer Clubhouse received a score of "Solid"
Health Department - The Health Department is receiving an overall 1.8% increase which fully funds the baseline and children's dental program request and
provides a 5% increase for the CHIP program based on the ABRT recommendation.
SHE: SHE received a 5% increase over FY08 based on their "Exemplary" score from ABRT. The County is recommending an additional $3,788 in tax relief for
their new facility. This is the County's share of the net increase in property tax related.
Teensight: Based on recommendations from the ABRT, the County is not funding Teensight. However, we are recommending holding funds aside in
contingency to meet the community need for childcare and parenting support for pregnant teens. The County will be working with CCF, the City, and United
Way to determine how to best use these funds.
24
PARKS, RECREATION, AND CULTURE FUNCTIONAL AREA
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION (INCLUDES PARKS & GYPSY MOTH)
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC.APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $1,210,779 $1,229,911 $1,229,911 $1,320,089 $1,320,089 $90,178 7.3%
BENEFITS 326,884 334,965 334,965 357,723 357,723 22,758 6.8%
OPERATING 586,631 643,979 646,365 612,222 593,502 (50,477) -7.8%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 118,744 117,490 121,635 100,845 25,670 (91,820) -78.2%
C1P OPERATING IMPACT 0 0 0 24,179 24,179 24,179
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $2,243,037 $2,326,345 $2,332,876 $2,415,058 $2,321,163 ($5,182) -0.2%
PERSONNEL 19,0 19,0 19.0 19.0 19.0 0.0 0.0%
(permanent positions only)
Salaries
- Regular salaries increasing 3.3591'
_ Part Time Wages are increasing $56,090, or 15.1 %, and reflect a shift in the line item where part time workers are budgeted. In previous
years this was budgeted as an operating expense under professional and contracted services. The change is a result of IRS regulations.
Operating Expenses
- $44,800 reduction in Professional Services due to transfer of charges to part time wages
_ Increase of $6,260 for the City run therapeutic programs. This is based on increased participation by County residents.
_ Eliminates funding for the Gypsy Moth Program (a savings of $16,840). This program has seen minimal activity over the last several years.
Funding, if needed, can be appropriated during the year.
Capital Outlay: Reduction in motor vehicle replacement fee from $3.00 per gallon to $1.S0 per gallon of fuel.
CIP Operating Impact - Operating expenses necessary to open Patricia Byrom Forest Preserve Park and Preddy Creek Trail Park in FY 08/09
AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
RECREATION AND CULTURAL AGENCIES
African American Festival $3,000 $0 $0 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000
Albemarle Ch'ville Historical Soci $0 $0 $0 $3,150 $0 $0
Alb./Char. Visitor's Bureau 424,796 476,181 476,181 545,721 545,721 69,540 14.6%
Albemarle County Fair 10,000 0 0 0 0 0
Ashlawn-Highland 9,220 9,773 9,773 11,000 10,164 391 4.0%
Charlottesville Marathon 0 0 0 6,000 0 0
First Night Virginia 0 0 0 5,000 0 0
Heritage Repertory Theater 0 0 0 5,000 0 0
JM Regional Library 2,756,270 3,041,270 3,041,270 3,218,242 3,173,138 131,868 4.3%
Jeffersonian Thanksgiving 0 0 0 5,000 0 0
Lewis and Clark Festival 3,500 0 0 0 0 0
Literacy Volu nteers 21,803 25,100 25,100 28,865 26,355 1,255 5.0%
Municipal Band 16,500 17,490 17,490 19,000 18,190 700 4.0%
Paramount Theater 0 0 0 10,000 0 0
Piedmont Arts Council 11,585 12,206 12,206 17,520 12,594 388 3.2%
Save the Fire Works 10,000 10,000 10,000 12,000 10,000 0 0.0%
Virginia Festival of the Book 11,150 11,500 11,500 12,300 11,960 460 4.0%
Virginia Film Festival 15,000 15,750 15,750 18,2S0 16,380 630 4.0%
Virginia Discovery Museum 11,263 11,613 11,613 11,978 11,978 365 3.1%
WHTJ Public TV 4,956 5,253 5,253 5,516 5,463 210 4.0%
WVPT Public TV 4,956 5,253 5,253 5,575 5,463 210 4.0%
WVTF/IQ Radio 0 0 0 15,000 0 0
Zona Latina 0 3,000 3,000 0 0 (3,000) -100.0%
TOTAL AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS $3,313,999 $3,644,389 $3,644,389 $3,958,117 $3,850,406 $206,017 5.7%
Most agencies are recommended for a 4% increase. No new agency funding recommended except for the reinstatement of funding
for the African American Festival ($3,000).
Albemarle-Charlottesville Visitor's Bureau increase per formula (30% of first 5% of PY transient occupancy tax receipts).
JM Regional Library - Recommending 4,3% increase which will fully fund requested baseline operating increase. No funding provided
for requested initiatives ($45,104) which include additional part-time help in several libraries, part-time assistance with bookmobile for
outreach to nursing homes/assisted living facilities; and a substitute librarian for the Historical Library,
Piedmont Council of the Arts and Virginia Discovery Museum are increasing 3.2% and 3.1% respectively. Recommended funding
includes a 4% increase in local funds and an anticipated $2,500 Local Challenge Grant from the Virginia Commission for the Arts for
each agency.
25
COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 . FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/ APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $3,213,S69 $3,711,9S6 $3,421,9S6 $3,7S3,913 $3,571,664 ($140,292) -3.8%
BENEFITS 1,118,567 1,252,333 1,225,458 1,296,052 1,228,357 (23,976) -1.9%
OPERATING 441,693 443,563 778,988 444,198 364,988 (78,575) -17.7%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 73,441 49,350 49,350 46,385 41,345 (8,005) -16.2%
DEBT /TRANSFERS 44,797 62,914 100,181 21,600 21,600 (41,314) -65.7%
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES 0 0 0 0 0 0
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $4,892,067 $S,S20,l16 $5,575,933 $5,562,148 $5,227,954 ($292,162) -5.3%
PERSONNEL 67.0 68.0 67.0 67,0 67.0. 0.0 0.0%
.NOTE: A Planner, Senior Planner, Rural Areas Support Planner, and Intake Support Specialist are currently frozen, bringing the funded
position total down to 63.0
Salaries & Benefits: Includes 3.35% market increase and four frozen positions - three in the Planning Division and one in Administration
Operating Expenses
_ Master Planning expenses reduced by $65,000. Because Master Plans have not been completed as quickly as anticipated, sufficient funds
carried forward from previous years are available to cover anticipated expenses in FY 08/09.
_ Professional Consultant fees decreases by $12,000 to reflect the completion of a major project that had required professional assistance
(ZTAs)
Capital Outlay: Reduction in motor vehicle replacement fee from $3.00 per gallon to $1.50 per gallon of fuel.
Debt/Transfers: Decrease of $41 ,314 is based on the completion and final payment of a lease-purchase program for CountyView software
The Inspections Division is organizationally a part of Community Development. However, because of reporting requirements, it is
included in the public safety functional area. The chart below combines the costs and personnel for the entire Community Development
Department. See page 19 for details of the Inspections budget.
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $4,892,067 $5,520,116 $5,575,933 $5,562,148 $5,227,954 ($292,162) -5.3%
INSPECTIONS 1,17S,286 1,216,907 1,216,907 1,268,309 1,OS8,S35 (158,372) -13,0%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $6,067,354 $6,737,023 $6,792,840 $6,830,457 $6,286,489 ($450,534) -6.7%
PERSONNEL 84.0 85.0 84.0 84.0 84.0. 0,0 0.0%
.NOTE: In total, there are currently 7 frozen positions, bringing the funded position total down to 77.0.
HOUSING
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES $318,801 $372,456 $328,639 $341,647 $341,647 ($30,809) -8.3%
BENEFITS 117,386 134,802 119,185 126,105 126,105 (8,697) -6.5%
OPERATING 322,602 327,619 682,662 327,486 326,126 (1,493) -0.5%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,181 3,615 3,615 2,655 1,080 (2,535) -70.1%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $760,970 $838,492 $1,134,101 $797,893 $794,958 ($43,534) -5.2%
PERSONNEL 8,0 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 (1.0) -12.5%
Salaries & Benefits: Includes 3.35% market increase and the elimination of one position. Functions of that position are now being carried
out in the County Executive's Office.
Capital Outlay: Reduction in motor vehicle replacement fee from $3.00 per gallon to $1.50 per gallon of fuel.
26
COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT FUNCTIONAL AREA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
AHIP $427,699 $400,315 $400,315 $473,973 $416,328 $16,013 4.0%
Alliance for Community Choice 0 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 0 0.0%
Charlottesville Design Center 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 0.0%
CVSBDC 5,000 7,500 7,500 10,000 7,800 300 4.0%
CTS-Bus Contract 367,374 666,248 686,248 678,372 678,372 12,124 1.8%
MACAA 176,464 186,748 186,748 196,829 179,060 (7,688) -4.1%
Piedmont Housing Alliance 93,542 109,035 109,035 127,382 113,396 4,361 4.0%
Soil & Water Conservation 85,175 85,834 87,387 95,921 95,921 10,087 11.8%
StreamWatch Program 10,000 10,400 10,400 10,816 10,816 416 4.0%
TJ Planning District Commission 97,077 104,127 104,127 113,092 108,292 4,165 4.0%
Virqinia COOD. Extension Servicl 159,896 193,241 193,241 195,445 195,445 2,204 1.1%
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $1,422,227 $1,769,948 $1,791,501 $1,938,330 $1,811,930 $41,982 2.4%
PERSONNEL 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0,0%
Most agencies are recommended for a 4% increase (or as requested if less) with the following exceptions:
MACAA: The decrease reflects the recommendation by the ABRT to eliminate funding for the Project Discovery - Elementary Program which
had previously been funded at $15,600. Other MACAA programs approved for funding include Head Start (5%), Project Discovery (5%), Hope
House (5%), Family Economic Security (3%), CARES (5%), and CHIP (5%).
CTS: Funding recommended as requested which includes providing grant match for night service on Route 5 ($69,601).
Soil & Water Conversation: The contribution to the Soil & Water Conservation District is increasing 11.8% resulting primarily from the
reclassification of the County funding clerical position (12.1 % increase) and an increase in office rent.
27
NON-DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
NON-DEPARTMENTAl EXPENDITURES
FY 06/07 FY 07/08 I FY 07/08 FY 08/09 I FY 08/09 I $ %
ACTUAL APPROP REVISED REQUEST RECOMM REC-APP REC/APP
EXPENDITURES
TRANSFER TO SCHOOLS $91,165,717 $98,433,401 $95,432,007 $100,667,738 $99,355,566 $922,165 0.9%
TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE 13,202,724 14,163,343 14,163,343 14,843,747 14,843,747 680,404 4.8%
TRANSFER TO CAPITAL 18,141,923 11,630,664 11,148,451 11,961,299 10,115,640 (1,515,024) -13,0%
REVENUE SHARING 10,134,816 13,212,401 13,212,401 13,633,950 13,633,950 421,549 3.2%
REFUNDS 182,577 146,590 146,590 169,500 169,500 22,910 15.6%
CONTINGENCY RESERVES 0 1,075,989 1,156,079 638,400 544,000 (531,989) -49.4%
OTHER 180,600 0 67,200 50,000 25,000 25,000
EXPENDITURE TOTAL $133,008,357 $138,662,388 $135,326,071 $141,964,634 $138,687,403 $25,015 0.0%
Transfer to Schools: This transfer is based on a revenue sharing formula whereby the schools receive 60% of all new local tax revenue after the
City of Charlottesville revenue sharing payment, transfers to debt and capital, refunds, tax relief for the elderly and disabled, and the Board's
reserve are taken off the top.
Transfer to Debt Service: This transfer is made each year to make the interest and principal payments on funds borrowed by the County and
Schools for capital projects. School debt service is increasing $679,029 and local government debt service is increasing $1,375.
Transfer to Capital: The C1P transfer is made up of three components - 1) increases the base from the previous year by the overall rate of
revenue growth; 2) set aside an additional one-half percentage of operating budget growth; and 3) two cents of the tax rate. Once this
calculation has been done, the amount required for debt service is taken off the top. The remainder is left as cash for school, general
government, and storm water capital projects. The County Executive's Recommended Budget includes a change in the third component of the
C1P transfer, limiting it to one cent of the tax rate. This has the impact of reducing cash available for capital projects by $1.5 million. This
reduction does not impact any of the projects scheduled for FY 08/09.
Contingency Reserves: This includes a $300,000 Board Reserve, a $224,000 merit pool reserve to distribute when merit scores are finalized,
and a $20,000 reclassification reserve to address any salary reclassifications that occur during FY 08/09.
Other: This includes funding in the amount of $25,000 for the Employee Recognition Program. In FY 07/08 this was budgeted within the
departments and totaled $50,000 for a total reduction of $25,000 in FY 08/09.
28
...
INITIATIVES
Dept Total Revenue One Time Recurring
Department Initiative Priority FTEs Cost Offset Net Cost Cost Cost
Funded Initiatives
Police Police Officers 1 of 1 4.0 465,917 20,000 445,917 177,000 268,917
Fire Rescue Pantops Personnel (April 2009)' 2of4 6.0 470,000 0 470,000 234,500 747,606
Parks & Rec Maintenance - Preddy Creek & Byrom Park 1 of 1 0.0 24,179 0 24,179 0 24,179
COO Route 5 Night Service 1 of 1 0.0 69,601 0 69,601 0 69,601
Total 10.0 1,029,697 20,000 1,009,697 411,500 1,110,303
Unfunded Initiatives
OSS Adult & Child Protective Services Positions 1 of 4 2.5 163,423 22,798 140,625 6,252 134,373
OSS Eligibility Workers and OA III 2of4 2.5 164,496 82,248 82,248 11,628 70,620
OSS Family Support Workers 3of4 1.5 87,179 12,162 75,017 3,626 71,391
OSS Preschool Program (Bright Stars) 4of4 4.0 175,945 101,880 74,065 0 74,065
Fire Rescue Battalion Chiefs 3of4 2.0 318,988 0 318,988 53,000 265,988
Gen. Services Enhanced Median Mowing 1 of 3 0.0 45,269 0 45,269 0 45,269
OFO Project Manager 1 of 1 1.0 73,223 0 73,223 0 73,223
Total 13.5 1,028,523 219,088 809,435 74,506 734,929
Initiatives Reauirina More Study
Fire Rescue Volunteer Recruitment and Retention 1 of 4 0.0 314,000 0 314,000 0 314,000
Fire Rescue Seminole Trail Staffing (half-year) 4of4 2.5 188,177 0 188,177 14,500 173,677
Gen. Services HVAC Technician 2of3 1.0 101,720 0 101,720 29,000 72,720
Gen, Services PT Assistance for Env. Compliance Mgr 3of3 0.5 16,678 0 16,678 0 16,678
Total 4.0 620,575 0 620,575 43,500 577,075
Five Year Plan Initiatives
Transit 100,000 0 100,000 0 100,000
Affordable Housing 100,000 0 100,000 0 100,000
Environmental Initiatives 50,000 0 50,000 0 50,000
Total 250,000 0 250,000 0 250,000
'Recurring costs reflect full year of operations.
"For information on the review process and current list of frozen positions, please see page 31.
29
~
Initiative Summaries
FY 08/09
Funded Initiatives
. Police Officers: Four additional officers are requested to continue to move the Department towards the
Comprehensive Plan's staffing objective of 1.5 officers per 1000 population and to provide the resources
necessary to support the County's desired level of Police service. Priority 1 of 1.
. Pantops Fire Station Personnel: Implementation of a (temporary) fire station and staffing in the Pantops
development area. This initiative is essential 1) to replace the pending expiration of City fire contract
service and 2) support the County's Land Use Policy by providing a level of service consistent with
development area expectations. Priority 2 of 4.
. Byrom Park Forest Preserve Park and Preddy Creek Trail Park Maintenance: This request provides the
minimum funding to open and operate the Patricia Byrom Forest Preserve Park and the Preddy Creek Trail
Park in FY08-09. Included are funds to hire part time employees to open and close the park gates daily,
provide for porta-toilet service, cleaning supplies, and repair and maintenance supplies. Also included are
funds for additional fuel as well as other vehicles and equipment expenses. It should be noted that the
operating costs for these parks are minimized due to the planned use of the existing inmate workforce
crew to take on the routine maintenance of these parks supplemented by the work of trail volunteers.
. Route 5 Night Service: The Route 5 transit route currently runs between Barracks Road Shopping Center
and Wal-Mart on roads that parallel Route 29 north. Route 5 has service every 30 minutes and operates
6:15 a.m. to 7:15 p.m, This budget initiative is requesting funds to extend service until 11 :00 p.m. with
service every 30 minutes. Night service along Route 29 north is recommended in the current Transit
Development Plan (TDP) that was completed in 2006. The County's transit service is contracted to the
Charlottesville Transit Service (CTS). Priority 1 of 1.
Unfunded Initiatives
. Protective Services: Request funding for one new full-time position and expand one half-time position to
full time to provide Adult Protective Services to vulnerable disabled and elderly adults; and one new full-
time position to provide Child Protective Services to vulnerable children. Priority 1 of 4.
. Eligibility Services: Additional Eligibility Workers and OA staff requested to meet the requirements of the
agency's benefit programs including Food Stamps, TANFjVIEW and Medicaid, (including Long Term Care)
to ensure quality customer service, reduce paid overtime and to maintain compliance with mandated
standards. Priority 2 of 4.
. Family Support Services: Request 1.5 positions to increase the Family Support Program's capacity to
serve students and their families at three middle schools with a full time Family Support Worker. The
Family Support Workers serve children who are at risk. Priority 3 of 4.
. Bright Stars: Additional preschool program requested to meet current and anticipated increases in
applications. Also, request local matching funds to sustain 2007-2008 Governor's Preschool Pilot Grant if
the state does not continue the grant for the second year. Priority 4 of 4.
. Battalion Chiefs: Addition of two (2) Battalion Chiefs to provide 24-hour supervision of career fire rescue
operations. Priority 3 of 4.
. Enhanced Median Mowing: This initiative is to increase the frequency of events provided by contractors
in a variety of mowing and landscaping tasks including entrance corridor median mowing, entrance
corridor shoulder mowing, entrance corridor curb edging, and entrance corridor and County Office
Building landscape services. Priority 1 of 3.
. Project Manager: Additional full-time Project Manager to oversee significant increase in construction
volume and offset premium costs associated with employing private contractors for this service, Priority 1
of 1.
30
'"
Initiatives Reauirina Further Study
. Volunteer Recruitment and Retention: Volunteer program support funding is proposed to help ensure
the success and sustainability of our current volunteer-based fire and emergency medical services (EMS)
delivery system. While the anticipated addition of career fire and EMS providers will not likely be affected,
this proposed initiative does seek to help maintain our current volunteer corps at its present level despite
national trends to the contrary. Priority 1 of 4.
. Seminole Trail Personnel: Addition of 5 FTEs to Seminole Trail VFD to staff a second company during
weekdays (M-F 6a-6p) to meet high emergency incident call load. Priority 4 of 4.
. HVAC Technician: This position will provide in-house capability to perform necessary preventive
maintenance, trouble-shooting, and repairing of the Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning systems.
The complexities of the systems vary at each facility and will require a journeyman level individual with
extensive diagnostic experience. This work is currently being completed by contracts. Priority 2 of 3.
. Part-time Assistance for Environmental Management Program: This part time position would be used
for general research, data review and entry, drafting reports, assisting in field work, and other minor
record keeping tasks. This will enable the Environmental Program Manager to focus on all of the
important environmental initiatives and ensure the County moves forward in its effort to be a leader in
protecting the environment. Priority 3 of 3.
Five Year Plan Initiatives
. Transit: This funding would be set aside in anticipation of the need for additional investment to move
toward an expanded regional transit system.
. Affordable Housing: In FY 08/09, funding would be used to bolster the homebuyer assistance program.
. Environmental Initiatives: This funding would be used for implementing an Environmental Management
System (EMS) for local government only.
Frozen Positions
With the accelerated downturn in the housing market creating a revenue shortfall in FY 07/08, the County
Executive instituted a hiring freeze that resulted in the "freezing" of 16 vacant positions and a significant
expenditure savings in the current fiscal year. The County's Five-Year Financial Plan and recommended FY 08/09
operating budget maintain this hiring freeze, meaning that for that duration, the budget will include the savings
associated with a given 16 positions throughout the organization.
As vacancies occur beyond the original 16 "frozen" positions, a team comprised of several County department
heads will review the vacant positions' relative impacts. The team will recommend to the County Executive filling
the vacancies that ensure the County's most "core" programs and services will be adequately delivered in the long-
term. While not always a clear distinction, "core" programs and services are those that meet any of the following
criteria:
Meet a state or federal mandate
. Have a potential immediate or near-term effect on public safety or health
. Have a beneficial effect on the daily lives of a significant segment of the population and/or County
departments and is not the core service of any other entity
. Provide direct support or critical indirect support for a "core" service
"Enhanced" programs and services are those that do not meet the "core" criteria and may include services that
exceed the requirements of a state or federal mandate and/or support a County Strategic Goal or Objective. In
general, "core" positions will be given priority over "enhanced" positions when filling vacancies; however,
"enhanced" positions directly related to specific Strategic Plan Objectives will be given additional consideration
over some "core" positions.
Additionally, as new vacancies occur, many departments will reorganize as possible, which may result in the
reassignment of duties and elimination of a vacant position. As a result of this process to date, the County has
eliminated 3 positions and reduced the Office of Management and Budget's staffing by .5 FTE through
reorganization, leaving 13 "frozen" positions.
The following table is a preliminary ranking of the 13 "frozen" positions and is current as of February 8, 2008. This
ranking will fluctuate as additional vacancies occur and as departments provide new information demonstrating
these vacancies' impacts on services.
31
..
Preliminary Ranking of Current Frozen Positions:
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
TBD
TBD
TBD
Position
Animal Control Officer
Senior Engineering Inspector
Engineer Inspector
Planner
Senior Planner
Civilian Patrol Support Assistant
Rural Areas Support Planner
Office Associate IV
Organizational Development Specialist
Civil Engineer
Intake Support Specialist
Office Associate IV
Tax Clerk
Department
Police
Community Development (Inspections)
Community Development (Inspections)
Community Development (Planning)
Community Development (Planning)
Police
Community Development (Planning)
Information Technology
Human Resources
Community Development (Inspections)
Community Development (Central Operations)
Finance
Finance
32
Classification
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Enhanced
Core
Enhanced
Enhanced
Core
Core
Enhanced
Draft: 02/13/08
ORDINANCE NO. 08-17( )
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17, WATER PROTECTION, OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF ALEMARLE, VIRGINIA, BY AMENDING ARTICLE III, STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT AND
WATER QUALITY
BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 17, Water
Protection, Article III, Stormwater management and water quality, are amended and reordained as follows:
By Amending:
Sec, 17-321
Sec, 17-322
Types of development which may be allowed in stream buffer by program authority
Mitigation plans
Chapter 17. Water Protection
Article III. Stormwater Management and Water Quality
Sec. 17-321 Types of development which may be allowed in stream buffer by program authority.
Development in a stream buffer may be authorized by the program authority in the circumstances
described below, provided that a mitigation plan is submitted to, and approved, by the program authority
pursuant to section 17-322:
1, on a lot which is located within a development area but is not within a water supply protection
area: within the fifty (50) horizontal feet of stream buffer that is the most landward (furthest from the stream);
2, on a lot which is located within a water supply protection area or other rural land: within the
fifty (50) horizontal feet of stream buffer that is the most landward, but only for stormwater conveyance
channels or other necessary infrastructure, and only if such development is determined by the program authority
to be necessary to allow a reasonable use of the lot. In all cases under this paragraph, the building site and the
sewage disposal system shall be located outside of the stream buffer;
3. on a lot on which the development in the stream buffer will consist ofa lake, pond, or
ecological/wetland restoration project;
4. on a lot on which the development in the stream buffer will consist of the construction and
maintenance ofa drivewaYJoad or street road'll'ay, and the program authority determines that the stream buffer
would prohibit reasonable access to a p0l1ion of the lot which is necessary for the owner to have a reasonable
use of the lot necessarv for the lot to be used and develooed as Rermitted in the underlvin2. zonin2. district and
tl~_~i~t~iQ!U~liD.i!!~ IComment: The word "roadway" was changed to "road or street" because this
is the only section in the WPO that uses the word "roadway." Other sections refer to "road or street".
The proposed language clarifies that this subsection does not eliminate uses otherwise allowed under
applicable land use regulations.]
5, on a lot which was of record prior to the date of adoption of this chapter, on which the
development in the stream buffer will consist of the construction, installation and maintenance of water and
sewer facilities or sewage disposal systems, and the program authority determines that the stream buffer would
prohibit the practicable development of such facilities or systems, Any such sewage disposal system must
comply with all applicable state laws; and
6, on a lot which was of record prior to the date of adoption of this chapter, ifthe stream buffer
would result in the loss of a building site, and there are no other available building sites outside the stream
buffer on the lot, or to allow redevelopment as permitted in the underlying zoning district.
1
Draft: 02/13/08
(s 19.3-45,2-11-98; S 19,2-8,6-19-91, S 8; Code 1988, SS 19.2-8, 19,3-45; Ord, 98-A(I), 8-5-98; Ord, 08-
17(1),2-6-08)
Slate law referenee-- Va Code ~ 10.1-2108.
Sec. 17-322 Mitigation plan if development allowed in stream buffer.
Each owner who seeks to develop in a stream buffer pursuant to section 17-321 shall submit to the
program authority for review and approval a mitigation plan as provided herein:
A, The owner shall submit a mitigation plan that satisfies the applicable requirements of this
section, the fee required by section 17-310, and a certification stating that all requirements of the approved plan
will be complied with, If the miti~ation olan oertains to a drivewav. road or street encroachin~ into or crossin~ a
stream buffer. it shall be submitted with and reviewed bv the oro~ram authoritv in coordination with the
oreliminarv site plan or oreliminarv subdivisi_on plat. ifsuch a olan or olat is submitted or. ifnot. in coordination
with the final site olan or subdivision olat. IComment: This requirement is from 9 V AC 10-20-130(1)(d)(4);
note that there may be circumstances when a crossing may be sought that doesn't trigger the need for a
plan or plat.1
B, The mitigation plan shall be reviewed by the program authority to determine whether it
complies with the requirements ofthis section and all other requirements ofthis article, The program authority
shall approve or disapprove a mitigation plan within thirty (30) days that a complete plan was accepted for
review. The decision shall be in writing and shall be communicated to the owner. Ifthe plan is disapproved, the
reasons for such disapproval shall be stated in the decision,
C. Each mitigation plan shall:
1, identify the impacts of proposed development on water quality and lands within the
stream buffer;
2. ensure that, where development 00es take~ place within a stream buffer,4U -it-will the
orooosed develooment shall be located on those portions of a site and in a manner that will be least disruptive to
the natural functions ofthe stream buffer; (ii) no more land shall be disturbed than is necessary to orovide for
the orooosed development (iii) indi~enous ve~etation shall be oreserved to the maximum extent oracticable.
consistent with the prooosed develooment and (iv) the imoervious cover shall be minimized consistent with the
prooosed develooment IComment: These criteria are from 9 V AC 10-20-120(1), (2) and (5).1
3, demonstrate and assure that development will be conducted using best management
practices; where best mana~ement oractices reauire re~ular or oeriodic maintenance in order to continue their
functions. the oro~ram authoritv mav reQuire that the owner enter into a maintenance a~reement or some other
instrument that assures on~oin~ maintenance: IComment: This requirement is from 9 V AC 10-20-120(3).]
4, specify mitigation which will address water quality and stream buffer impacts; and
5, contain all other information requested by the program authority,
D. Each mitigation plan shall be evaluated by the program authority based on the following
criteria:
1, whether all reasonable alternatives to development in the stream buffer have been
explored and exhausted;
2, whether the development in the stream buffer is the minimum necessary and is
2
Draft: 02/13/08
conducted in a manner that will be least disruptive to the natural functions of the stream buffer; aH6
3. whether best management practices will effectively mitigate adverse impacts from the
encroachment on the stream buffer and its natural functions;~
4. whether the desilrn and con,struction of the develooment will satisfy the criteria in
subsections (c)Q) and (Cl(3): and IComment: This requirement is based on the criterion in 9 VAC 10-20-
130(1)(d)(3), which pertains to driveways, etc., but we assume that all mitigation plans would be reviewed
for satisfaction of the criteria in (C)(2) and (3).]
5. for drivewavs. roads and streets. whether their alilrnment and desilrn are ootimized.
~onsistent witl1 all other aRRlicable requirements. to minimize encroachment in the stream buffer and adverse
effects on water aualitv: in order to assure that encroachment into or across the stream buffer is minimized. the
prolrram authority mav limit the number of drivewavs. roads or streets encroachinlr or crossinlr the stream buffer
to serve a lot existinlr on March 12. 2008 and all lots created from the existinlr lot. I Comment: The first clause
is from 9 V AC 10-20-130(1)(d)(2). The second clause gives the program authority the express authority to
control the number of encroachments and crossings, including when lots are divided over time.]
(9 19.3-46,2-11-98; 9 19.2-8,6-19-91,9 8; 9 19.1-13,6-19-91,9 13; Code 1988, 99 19.1-13, 19.2-8, 19.3-46;
Ord. 98-A( I), 8-5-98)
Slate law reference-- Va. Code * 10.1-2108.
I, Ella W. Jordan, do hereby celtify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an Ordinance duly
adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of _ to _, as recorded
below, at a regular meeting held on
Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
Aye Nay
Mr. Boyd
Mr. DorrieI'
Ms. Mallek
Mr. Rooker
Mr. Slutzky
Ms. Thomas
3
ZUNKA, MILNOR, CARTER & INIGO, LTD.
Attorneys at Law
414 Park Street
POBox 1567
Charlottesville VA 22902
John W. Zunka
Richard H. Milnor
Richard E. Carter
Alvaro A. Inigo
Telephone 434-977-0191
Real Estate 434-977-5060
Facsimile 434-977-0198
February 11,2008
MAGRUDER DENT, JR.
1919-1994
ROBERTE. TAYLOR
1906-1998
Kenneth C. Boyd, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
By email kbovd@albemarle.org and regular mail
Dear Mr. Boyd:
I have clients who are being adversely affected by the new interpretation of
Section 17-321 of the Water Protection Ordinance. This is not the change in the
ordinance enacted on February 6, 2008 but the new interpretation of the existing
ordinance in regard to approval of mitigation plans to cross a stream buffer. It applies to
different situations including constructing a driveway to reach property on the other side
of the stream.
I believe you have Roger Ray's letters dated January 21 and February 1,2008. I
have attached them in case you do not have them. I have also attached my letter to Mark
Graham dated February 1,2008 and his email reply of February 4,2008.
I think Mr. Ray's concerns and mine are thc same. Over the past years, stream
crossings or development in stream buffers have been approved if accompanied by a
stream mitigation plan. Mr. Graham says that this was an "oversight [that] has been
corrected". He says that such approvals were in "a couple of circumstances". Actually,
there were many approvals. Mr. Ray has given you several plats that were approved. I
have spoken to other surveyors 'Nho ha\'c also had a number of plats approved.
It is net my purpose to respond 10 Mr. Graham's letter point by point although 1
am glad to do so if you request. My clients tilce not putting their property in conservation
easements because this new interpretation s~verely reduces the use which, in turn,
severely reduces the value. The reduction in value takes away any financial incentive to
use the conservation easement. I expect this will substantially decrease conservation
easements and land values throughout the county. This is unfortunate as conservation
easements have been a hallmark for recent Boards.
,"\ ,",\('\-1 f~
~,Uu[ (,
~
:l\
~
Kenneth C. Boyd, Chairman
Page 2
February 11, 2008
Under the new interpretation, if I have several hundred acres as my clients do,
they could not subdivide in large tracts if they had to cross a stream to get to that tract.
For example, if a landowner owns 500 acres and wants to divide it into five (5) IOO-acre
tracts with each in a conservation easement, he could not do so if he had to cross a stream
to get to a parcel.
Under the new interpretation, if a landowner had a 500-acre tract and a stream
traversed it just off the road on which it faced but there was enough room to build a house
between the road and the stream, he could not cross the stream to build a house on a knoll
in the woods unseen by the public.
There are probably more examples but I believe my point is made. I am not
talking about developers trying to put in a 100 lot subdivision. I am talking about people
who have been and, will continue to be, the good stewards of rural lands in Albemarle
County.
I hope the Board of Supervisors will review this matter and correct the
misinterpretations of the ordinance. If I can answer any questions or provide other
information, please call me.
Very truly yours,
~~
REC:smw Richard E. Carter
attachments
CC: Dennis S. Rooker dsrooker@earthlink.net
Sally Hyde Thomas sthomas@albemarle.org
David Lee Slutzky dslutzky(aJ,albemarle.org
Ann H. Mallek amallek@albemarle.org
Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr. riverstreet4444@vahoo.com
Robert W. Tucker, Jr. rtucker@albemarle.org
Larry W. Davis ldavis@albemarle.org
Mark Graham mgraham0>,albemarle.org
Glenn Brooks gbrooks@(!lbemarle.org
ROGER W. RAY & ASSOC., INC.
1717-18 ALLIED STREET
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22903
TELEPHONE: (434) 293-3196
FAX NUMBER: (434) 293..4202
E..MAIL: RWRINC@EARTHLlNK.NET
Brian S. Ray, LS
Roger W. Ray, LS
Land Surveyors
Land Planners
Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr.
Board of Supervisors Member
Representing the Scottsville District
P. O. Box 818
635 Valley Street
Scottsvllle, Virginia 24590
(434) 286-9390 fax
riverstreet4444@yahoo.com
January 21,2008
.'
Dear Mr. Dorrier,
This is a followwup to our conversation today concerning the administration of the current Water
Protection Ordinance and the changes that are proposed for Wednesday, January 23, 2008.
The County Planning staff is currently advising the public (property owners) that they will not
administratively approve any division of their property if it involves a driveway or road that would
disturb a stream buffer, with no exceptions. This applies even for a Family Division.
This is a major policy change that has occurred within the last few months without any ordinance
change. Prior to this new policy, land could be divided, and stream crossings made, as long as a
Mitigating Plan was approved to Insure that an equal amount of stream buffer was replenished.
This seems to be fair, and allows property owners to exercise their property rights.
I have clients who own large parcels of land in southern Albemarle that are contemplating a
conservation easement on their land. They have contacted me to prepare a Land Plan, for maximum
potential development of their property, so an appraiser can evaluate the decrease in their land value
if they give up their rights to subdivide Into smaller lots. These large parcels have several streams
traversing the property and the maximum number of lots will be greatly reduced if a driveway or road
can not be located within a stream buffer. This reduced potential for totallot$ will greatly affect
values for placing these large parcels in a conservation easement. I believe this ordinance will have
a negative effect on obtaining conservation easements.
ZOO'd 110# 8l:01 800l/8l/10
ZOlv SSl V08
AV~ 'M ~j80~:wOJj
I also have a client who Is 86 and lives in the Earlysville area. She lives on a parcel fronting the
public road and owns a six acre parcel in the rear of her house lot. She wants to divide the six acre
parcel into two lots (one each for her two grandchildren so that they can live in the immediate
vicinity). The six acre parcel has an intermittent stream traversing through the parcel and there is a
qualifying building site on each side of the intermittent stream. County staff has advised the
grandchildren that they will not approve a Family Division of the property because it would require a
driveway to be constructed within the stream buffer.
Both of the situations above seem to be very harsh and unfair to the affected property owners.
On9, to place a conservation easement on their property. And the other for a Grandmother to
provide a building lot for her Grandchildren.
I would like to propose the following amendment to the Water Protection Ordinance that would allow
the property owners to exercise their property rights in return for making a positive affect on stream
buffers.
Togay a fYjitiaatina Plan reauires that an equal amount of stream buffer be fe-established if
disturbance occurs, I prop08~ to Qbilnae that ratio from eau131 to a 2 to 1 or a 3 to 1 ratio of re-
establishing dl~urbed areas. This would areatly i"cress@ the overall established buffer within the
county and Clive a Dosltlve environmentallmoact.
I am in support of the Water Protection Ordinance and commend the county for their efforts to protect
the environment. I believe this can be accomplished, while allowing the land owners to retain their
property rights. The result would be positive for everyone involved if you adopt my suggestion.
We have been In the Drocess of Derforming sYIYti work on several proiects that we will not be able
to submit bv tomorrow. Therefore. I would suggest an effe~tive date of 60 days to tubmit Droiects
Ibould the Board decide to D8SS these ordinances,
I plan to attend the meeting on January 23. 2008, and answer any questions you may have.
Respectfully,
~,/~
Roger W. Ray, LS
copy:
Dennis S. Rooker. dsrooker@earthlink.net
Sally Hyde Thomas. sthomas@albemarle.org
David Lee Slutzky ~ dslutzky@albemarle.org
Ann H. Mallek. amallek@albemarle.org
Kenneth C. Boyd.. kboyd@albemarle.org
Karen Pape . Karen@PapeandCo.com
Frank Hardy Inc. Realtors - (434) 296-9730 fax
SOO"d 110# 8l:01 800l/8l/10
lOlv S6l v08
AV~ "M ~j80~:wOJj
ROGER W. RAY & ASSOC" INC.
1717-18 ALLIED STREET
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22903
TELEPHONE: (434) 293-3195
FAX NUMBER: (434) 293-4202
E-MAIL: RWRINC@EARTHLlNK.NET
Brian S, Ray, LS
Roger W. Ray, LS
Land Surveyors
Land Planners
Kenneth C. Boyd, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
And Board Members
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
kboyd@albemarle.org
February 1, 2008
Dear Supervisors:
This is a follow'-up to a letter that I sent to Lindsay G. Dorrier, Jr., dated January 21,2008.
I copied the remaining board members on that letter. In the letter, I stated that the county planning
staff is currently advising the public (property owners) that they will not administratively approve any
division of their property if it involves a driveway or road that would disturb a stream buffer. I also
stated that this is a major policy change that has occurred within the last few months.
On October 8, 2007, I attended a pre-submittal meeting with a client who wanted to purchase a
21.00 acre lot from a larger parcel of land, located on State Route 20, north of Scottsville.
The driveway to the building site on the new 21.00 acre lot would have crossed an existing stream
buffer. At that meetinq. we were advised by John Shepherd and Alan Schuck that thev had been
instructed by their superiors not to approve any division of land if it would require a driveway or road
to be constructed within a stream buffer. Thev further stated that they had been advised that, in
accordance with Section 17-321.5. for an owner to have reasonable use of their property. did not
include the division of their land. And that reasonable use was for the construction of one sinqle
family dwellinq. At several pre-submittal meetings, for other properties, since October 8, 2007,
we have been told the same thing by the planning staff. After being advised by county staff that their
plan would be denied, if it involved any disturbance of a stream buffer, our clients decided not to go
forward with the projects due to the expense of survey work and mitigating plans. I am not aware of
anyone submitting a mitigating plan that has been denied.
Since the enactment of the Water Protection Ordinance in August 1998, subdivisions have been
routinely, repeatedly. and consistently approved with roads and driveways encroachinq into or
crossinq stream buffers. If this is not acknowledged by your staff, I can give you numerous copies of
subdivision plats that have been approved and recorded in the Clerk's Office.
Once again, I want to state my support for this addition to the Water Protection Ordinance. However,
I also want to state my equal support for property owners being able to exercise their property rights,
including crossing streams, if necessary, to use their division rights.
I am reQuestinq that. prior to public comment, the Board discusses the following at the hearing on
February 6, 2008:
1. An explanation as to the major policy change that occurred on or about October 8.2007.
Mr. Boyd asked about this policy change at the meeting on January 23,2008. but did not get
a direct answer. I suggest that John Shepherd and Tamara Ambler be present at the meeting
to answer questions pertaining to what is being advised to the public.
2. Discuss thorough Iv and qive staff direction as to the Board's definition and meaning of
"to have a reasonable use of the lot" (Section 17-321.5). Will all of the approved subdivision
lots, created since 1989, that have a road or driveway crossing a stream buffer, be declared
non-conforming and created on an illegal subdivision plat if you uphold staffs current
administration of the definition of reasonable use?
3. Openly discuss and consider the following proposal:
Allow by~riQht road and driveway crossinqs of a stream buffer. Require that a mitigating plan
be submitted and approved that would establish an area of mitiqation with a two to one, or a
three to one ratio to the disturbed area. This would result in an overall maior increase of
stream protection.
This is a very important land use issue that has severe consequences for rural land owners.
None of the property owners that I have spoken with realize that "reasonable use" does not
include subdivision or building their house across a stream buffer.
In advance, I thank you for your consideration and attention to these matters.
Respectfully I
,/;/ /-;;/
7#/7
Roger W. Ray, LS
copy:
Dennis S. Rooker - dsrooker@earthlink.net
Sally Hyde Thomas ~ sthomas@albemarle.org
David Lee Slutzky - dslutzky@albemarle.org
Ann H. Mallek - amallek@albemarle.org
Lindsay Dorrier, Jr. ~ riverstreet4444@yahoo.com
Court Van Clief - seaboy50@aol.com
D.J. Van Clief - dgvc@breederscup.com
Richard Carter - rcarter@cstone.net
Karen Pape - Karen@PapeandCo.com
Frank Hardy Inc. Realtors - frankhardyinc@farmandestate.com
ZUNKA. MILNOR, CARTER & INIGO, L TD,
Attorneys at Law
414 Park Street
POBox 1567
Charlottesville VA 22902
John W. Zunka
Richard H. Miluor
Richard E. Carter
Alvaro A. Inigo
Telephone 434-977-0191
Real Estate 434-977-5060
Facsimile 434-977-0198
Magruder Dent, Jr.
1919-1994
Robert E. Taylor
1906-1998
February 1,2008
Mr. Mark Graham
Director of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, V A 22902
Via Email: mgraham@albemarIe.org
Dear Mr. Graham:
It has come to my attention from clients that there may be a change in the application
and/or interpretation of Chapter 17-321 of the Water Protection Ordinance.
Particularly, I call your attention to the language, "Development in a stream buffer may
be authorized by the program authority in the circumstance described below, provided that a
mitigation plan is submitted to, and approved, by the program authority pursuant to section 17-
322." While I am concerned about all the situations listed, I am particularly concerned about
subsection 5 (proposed 4) relating to construction and maintenance of a driveway or roadway in
a stream buffer.
It is my information that you and/or persons on the engineering staff have taken the
position that no such mitigation plan will be approved. In fact, applicants are being told that
mitigation plans are consistently being disapproved and that applicants should appeal to the
Board of Supervisors for relief. I assume this means that the plans are not being reviewed on
their merit. It is my further information that you have said that this is just a new interpretation of
the ordinance.
If any of this is true, it is very disturbing. This is not a matter of interpretation but a plain
disregard of the specific wording. The ordinance presumes that the mitigation plan will be
submitted. Then the program authority (you or someone under your direction such as the County
engineer) will review the plan. If the plan is insufficient, the applicant will be told what is needed
to make it sufficient. This method is in accordance with the ordinance and procedures established
for many years.
Page 2
Mr. Mark Graham
My clients own large tracts of land in southern Albemarle County. The property is
already in land use taxation but they are interested in putting it in a conservation easement so that
it can be preserved as rural agricultural property in perpetuity. One of the advantages of the
conservation easement is the tax deduction that may be taken to recognize the reduction in the
value of the land as it can be developed today and the reduced value when it is in the easement
and can no longer be fully developed. With the automatic rejection of stream mitigation plans,
the County has effectively reduced the value of the property now. In doing so, the tax advantage
incentive is removed and the control ofthe land over succeeding generations is lost. Surely, this
cannot be what the Board of Supervisors wants.
I would appreciate you clarifying this matter. Ifmy information is incorrect and
mitigation plans are being reviewed as they have been in the past, I apologize. If the application
and/or interpretation have changed, please clarify what the present application and interpretation
is, why it was changed and who dictated the change.
This matter not only affects my clients but many land owners in Albemarle County.
Thank you for your attention and I look forward to a prompt reply.
Very truly yours,
t?~a;-
Richard E. Carter
cc: Larry Davis ldavis@albemarle.org
Glenn Brooks gbrooks@albemarle.org
REC:sed
Page 1 of2
richard carter
From: Mark Graham [mgraham@albemarle.org]
Sent: Monday, February 04,200810:55 AM
To: rcarter@zmcilaw.com
Cc: Glenn Brooks; Larry Davis
Subject: RE: Water Protection Ordinance
Mr. Carter,
First, thank you for your letter explaining your concerns. Next, I believe there have been a couple of
circumstances in the last few years where this requirement was missed, but that oversight has been corrected
and I don't see how this relieves us of the obligation to enforce the ordinance. That said, I'll provide my
perspective on the issue at hand.
I believe you are correctly identifying the appropriate section of the Water Protection Ordinance but I am not sure
we agree on our understanding of this section. To assure we are speaking about the same parts, I have included
an excerpt below, with what I believe are the important parts highlighted.
Sec. 17-321 Types of development which may be allowed in stream buffer by program authority.
Development in a stream buffer may be authorized by the program authority in the circumstances
described below, provided that a mitigation plan is submitted to, and approved, by the program authority
pursuant to section 17-322:
1. on a lot which was of record prior to the date of adoption of this chapter and which is not
within a water supply protection area: within the fifty (50) horizontal feet of stream buffer that is the most
landward (furthest from the stream);
2. on a lot which is located within a development area or area of infill and redevelopment:
within the fifty (50) horizontal feet of stream buffer that is the most landward;
3. on a lot which: (a) is located within a water supply protection area; or (b) was of record
on or after the date of adoption of this chapter and is located within other rura11and: within the fifty (50)
horizontal feet of stream buffer that is the most landward, but only for stormwater conveyance channels or
other necessary infrastructure, and only if such development is determined by the program authority to be
necessary to allow a reasonable use ofthe lot. In all cases under this paragraph, the building site and the
sewage disposal system shall be located outside of the stream buffer;
4. on a lot on which the development in the stream buffer will consist of a lake, pond, or
ecological/wetland restoration project;
5. on a lot on which the development in the stream buffer will consist of the construction
and maintenance of a driveway or roadway, and the program authority determines that the stream buffer
would prohibit reasonable access to a portion of the lot which is necessary for the owner to have a
reasonable use of the lot;
6. on a lot which was of record prior to the date of adoption of this chapter, on which the
development in the stream buffer will consist of the construction, installation and maintenance of water and
sewer facilities or sewage disposal systems, and the program authority determines that the stream buffer
would prohibit the practicable development of such facilities or systems. Any such sewage disposal system
must comply with all applicable state laws; and
7. on a lot which was of record prior to the date of adoption of this chapter, if the stream
buffer would result in the loss of a building site, and there are no other available building sites outside the
stream buffer on the lot, or to allow redevelopment as permitted in the underlying zoning district.
(9 19.3-45, 2-11-98; 9 19.2-8, 6-19-91, 9 8; Code 1988, 9 9 19.2-8, 19.3-45; Ord. 98-A(I), 8-5-98)
With respect to the first sentence of this section, I would note this specifies when staff (acting as the program
authority) may allow development in a protected stream buffer and also specifies that for each of those
circumstances a mitigation plan must be approved before the development commences. The fundamental
question is not whether a mitigation plan can be reviewed and approved, but whether the proposed development
is one of the specified circumstances where the ordinance allows development to occur within the stream buffer.
This leads to an examination of the specific circumstance where a road or driveway necessary to support the
2/5/2008
Page 2 of2
development may be allowed, with #5 being the relevant part. The language clearly says the development in the
stream buffer may be allowed only if necessary to allow a reasonable use of the lot. In the specific situation you
have described, a reasonable use of the lot is a house and necessary accessories, (e.g. the driveway). As such,
if it is possible to place a house on the lot without a driveway or road extending into the stream buffer, the
ordinance simply does not provide staff the discretion to allow for development of a driveway or road into the
protected stream buffer. I do not see where staff has the type of discretion your letter suggests. Furthermore, I
believe this understanding of what constitutes a reasonable use of the lot is supported by the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Act Regulations, noting those regulations specify the following for encroachments into stream
buffers" Encroachments into the buffer area shall be the minimum necessary to achieve a reasonable buildable area for a
principal structure and necessary utilities." (9 VAC 10-20-130. Development criteria for Resource Protection Areas, Part 4).
Thus, the issue is not whether we can review and approve a mitigation plan. The issue is whether approval of a
mitigation plan can allow development within a protected stream buffer. The above clearly indicates that staff
cannot approve this development except where it is demonstrated that it is necessary to have a reasonable use of
the lot. Rather than have property owners spend the time and expense to prepare and submit a mitigation plan
that will not accomplish the desired purpose, staff advises those property owners and their agents when no
mitigation plan can be approved that allows development in the stream buffer. With respect to the appeal, staff is
simply responding to questions of how this determination can be further considered, noting the appeal of this
determination is with the County Board. That said, I do not see that the County Board has any more discretion
than staff in making this determination.
I hope this explains the issue to your satisfaction. If you have any additional questions, I will do my best to
answer them.
Mark Graham
Director of Community Development
From: richard carter [mailto:rcarter@zmcilaw.com]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 20089:46 AM
To: Mark Graham
Cc: Glenn Brooks; Larry Davis
Subject: Water Protection Ordinance
Mr. Graham
Attached is a letter for your attention.
Rick Carter
2/5/2008
IMPACT
Interfaith Movement for Promoting Action by Congregations Together
100 Alderman Road, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
434-220-2450
February 5, 2008
Supervisor Kenneth Boyd
Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Supervisor Boyd,
We thank you for your leadership in our community. As you know, our community
continues to face many difficult challenges, especially in assuring that opportunities to
live safe and healthy lives are extended to all residents in our area.
Because of our on-going concern about the lack of safe, affordable and healthy options
for many of our neighbors, IMP ACT, an organization of 28 congregations in
Charlottesville and Albemarle County, has continued our research efforts on affordabIe
housing. We have developed specific proposals to better meet the need for housing for
families earning under 30 percent of Average Median Income. We are eager to work
with you to gain your support for our proposals.
To that end, we invite you to attend IMPACT's second annual large public assembly on
March 10,2008 at University Hall at the University of Virginia. Sign in will be at 6:15
pm, music at 6:30 pm, pre-meeting for the assembly at 6:45 pm, with the program
officially starting at 7 pm.
Before that date, representatives from IMP ACT would like to meet with you to discuss
the details of our proposal and the format of the meeting and to review any questions you
may have.
We look forward to continuing to work with you to improve conditions for all in our
community.
~l!ii~
Evergreen Ministries
Co-President
~.~~
Holy Comforter Catholic Church
Co-President
State Environmental Review Process - F AQs
http://www . virginiadot.org/business/ serp-local- faqs.asp
Vi nr inia. go\'
-.....-.....-
Online Services I Commonwealth Sites I Help I Governor
Search Virginia.gov
I
'VDOT I
~~'"._m_ /
Business Center
RECEIVED /r" 80S MEETING
Date: O? '/3 .~ 008
Agenda Itam #:_..10 - '3'~ tp 'vferf\ll'c.,
(', kf::or.ti!!:t Us I .Search this S.ite '-W1 ~ f-/
'..' er ~ ,omals:._ . _ I' I
Home> Business> State Environmental Review Process - FAQs
State Environmental Review Process - FAQs
1. What Is the SERP?
The State Environmental Review Process (SERP) is conducted by VDOT and provides other state resource agencies the opportunity to comment and supply environmental
reSource information on transportation projects at the earliest possible stage of development. The information the state resource agencies provide assists the Locality and
VDOT in determining if the proposed project has significant environmental impacts. The process is intended to allow agency Input early in project design so that avoidance or
minimization efforts can be incorporated to lessen potential impacts to the environment.
Only VDOT can conduct SERP and the localities are responsible for completing the environmental commitments identified. Environmental commitments can include cultural
resource surveys, Threatened and Endangered Species surveys, obtaining water quality permits, elc.
2. What is the law behind SERP?
3. What projects are submitted through SERP?
~AlIjlI'O~~ng vD61~''''~~1Q QQ.lI)t'Qll9h S~~~I!<I8;1IlO{lIes for~. ~ f'lIIll~orlmP"\l~\Revenue Sharing,
Industrial Access, Recreational Access, Rail Access, and Airport Access. SERP also applies to all federally funded projects. as there is a state match involved.
4. How does SERP work?
SERP is initiated when the Locality submits aProiect Earlv Notification form (EQ-429) to their VDOT Project Coordinator. That contact will submit the form to the appropriate
VDOT District Environmental Manager. A USGS topographic map illustrating the project location (including start and end points) must be included with the form, Once
completed. VDOT submits the EQ-429 to various state agencies. Each agency studies the information and researches potential impacts to resources under their jurisdiction.
The agency representatives provide this information and any database results back to VDOT who compiles a summary report of the data into <Preliminarv Environmental
Inventory form (PEl) and resubmits that information to the agencies for final review and comment. Once the agencies have responded to the PEl, this information is provided
to the Locality and appropriate VDOT Divisions for use in planning and designing the project. The early input by the state resource agencies allows for avoidance and
minimization efforts in project design to lessen potential impacts to the environmentThe PEl is a preliminary step in gathering environmental information. The locality is
responsible for any necessary coordination with state and federal agencies for studies, permits, etc. The PEl is not a substitute for studies and the agency coordination
necessary to identify specific project impacts to the environment.
5. Who performs SERP?
The SERP applies specifically to VDOT funded projects and therefore only VDOT Environmental staff can perform the process. However, the locality is responsible for any
environmental commitments (surveys, agency coordination, etc.) identified in the SERP PEl.
6. When is SERP initiated?
The SERP is initiated as soon as funding is authorized and prior to any ground disturbance, substantial location or design work.
7. How long does SERP take?
Generally, 60 to 90 days.
8. What information does SERP provide?
The EQ-429 and U.S.G.S. topographic map are sent to the IECC representatives, providing them with information about the scope of the project. The state agencies are
concemed with a variety of impacts which include, but are not limited to: water quality permitting, weiland impacts, effects on historic properties or archaeological sites, impact
to parks and recreation areas, endangered species, and hazardous waste issues.
The database information and comments provided by the resource agencies provide VDOT with information about environmentally sensitive areas that is shared with the
localities. The database information and comments should serve as the basis for procuring professional environmental consultanl services to conduct the technical studies.
g. What do you do with the results of the SERP?
Once the PEl has been distributed to the IECC members, the VDOT District Environmental Manager will prepare a memorandum indicating the SERP commitments and any
other outstanding issues remaining on the project that must be addressed prior to construction. Outstanding environmental issues or commitments may include but are not
limited to: cultural resource surveys, coordinating and obtaining water quality permits and associated conditions, hazardous materials testing, threatened and endangered
species surveys or environmental documents that have not been completed. The memorandum and PEl are sent to the Locality, This information then serves as the basis for
procuring the appropriate professional environmental consultant services to conduct the technical studies. However, the PEl is not a substitute for studies and agency
coordination necessary to identify specific project impacts to the environment.
10. Are all environmental requirements included in SERP?
No. Projects utilizing federal-aid funds have additional environmental requirements that are not covered by the SERP. These requirements can involve but are not limited to:
noise impacts and analysis, Executive Orders, Section 4 (I) Evaluations and NEPA documents.
Page last modified: Sunday, October 29, 2006
@ 2008 Virginia Department of Transportation I WAI Compliance, Freedom of Information Act
This Web site includes hyperlinks to sites neither controlled nor sponsored by VDOT or the Commonwealth of Virginia. Links may open in a new window.
Some resources on this site require the Adobe Reeder and Flash Player and the Microsoft Word and PowerPolnt viewers.
1 of 1
2/13/2008 1 :23 PM
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
FOR THE REVIEW OF HIGHWAY PROJECTS UNDERTAKEN
BY THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Puroose
*he purpose of this agreement is to provide the basis for a balanced consideration .of
~nvironmental .and transportation needs during the development of highway projects undertaken by 'the
Virginia' Department of TransportatiorllFoI1oWingearty notification of project initiation and a determination
ofproj,ct;sig~ (refer to Appendix 1I)~fttm.ted:~wUlbe coordinated with state natural and
:Ai$.toOOj~lJree"~for review in accordance'wlth 1he additional processdescribedheqln. Federal
transportation projects will be processed in accordance with existing procedures established by the Federal
Highway Administration and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for proposed projects requiring either a
federal license or utilizing federal funds. The state natural and historic resource agencies are participants
in the federal review process.
It is essential for the Commonwealth of Virginia to continue to protect its historic and natural
heritage while providing a safe and efficient transportation infrastructure to meet the needs of the citizens of
Virginia. This can best be accomplished through the implementation of a formal review process. The
Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Natural Resources commit their respective agencies to
carry out this process, to be referred to as the State Environmental Review process (SERP), as provided by
this memorandum of agreement.
The intent is to provide state natural and historic resource agencies an opportunity to review and
comment on appropriate projects and categories of projects to address the environmental impact of the
project; any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided if the project is undertaken; the
measures proposed to minimize the impact of the project; any alternatives to the proposed construction;
and any irreversible environmental changes which would be involved in the project.
_ When necessary, schedule and conduct meetings on the third Tuesday of each month for the
Interagency Environmental Coordination Committee at a prearranged location and time to
provide resource agencies an opportunity to review and comment on transportation project
proposals; this process complements existing coordination meetings conducted for
transportation projects requiring federal permits or utilizing federal funds.
Prepare and distribute minutes of the meetings to participating agencies.
Elevate unresolved environmental issues first to the Commissioner and subsequently to the
Secretary of Transportation.
Maintain a record of consultation for the purpose of evaluating the process.
Provide qualified and consistent representation empowered to enter into agreement on
individual projects.
The Interagency Environmental Coordination Committee will:
Provide the Virginia Department of Transportation with, or access to, existing databases or
inventory information relevant to individual projects for impact assessment within 30 days of
early notification.
Provide project comments and guidance consistent with the agencies' jurisdiction and the
participants' designated area of expertise.
Identify specific agency concerns for early resolution.
Provide the Virginia Department of Transportation with a response to the Preliminary
Environmental Inventory within 15 days of its distribution.
Provide support in resolving issues directly related to an agency's area of responsibility.
Participate in the scheduled Interagency Environmental Coordination Committee meetings;
provide qualified and consistent representation empowered to enter into agreement on
individual projects.
APPENDIX I
DETAILS OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS
1. The Virginia Department of Transportation will provide annually, upon request, the environmental and
historic resource agencies (known as the Interagency Environmental Coordination Committee, or
IECC) copies of the Virginia Transportation Development Plan for interstate, urban and primary
highways; and will provide any county's secondary road plan as requested.
2. The Virginia Department of Transportation will provide the IECC agencies early notification of project
initiation for projects meeting the criteria established by each agency which affect resources under their
jurisdiction and authority. The IECC agencies affected by the project will respond to the early
notification within 30 days of receipt by providing the Virginia Department of Transportation with early
inventory information.
3. The information that the Virginia Department of Transportation receives from the IECC agencies will be
combined with the results of a preliminary field review to complete an environmental inventory for the
project.
4. If requested by a participating agency, any project may be submitted to the scoping process and
presented at a meeting for all IECC agencies. If, at this point or later, it is determined that a project
requires a federal action, it will be coordinated through the Federal Highway Administration under the
National Environmental Policy Act or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under the Section 404 permit
process. The state agencies comprising the Interagency Environmental Coordination Committee are
participating members in the federal project review process.
5. Scoping is an early and continuing process for determining the range of issues to be addressed on a
project and for identifying the significant issues, if any, related to the proposed project. Scoping also
identifies and eliminates from detailed study the issues that are not significant.
The scoping process will be accomplished through a meeting administered by the Virginia Department
of Transportation. AIIIECC agencies should attend the meeting. Project presentation at the meetings
will include information on alternatives, environmental impacts, and avoidance or minimization efforts.
APPENDIX II
TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ACTION
Conduct IECC
Meeting
6 Year Plans
to
Resource Agencies
Early Notification Environmental
of 30 Days Agencies Provide
Project Initiation - Inventory Data
Preparation of
Environmental
Inventory
15 as
y
Yes
Resolve
Issues
Close SERP
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Public Hearing to Consider Granting Sewer Lateral
Easement
AGENDA DATE:
February 13, 2008
ITEM NUMBER:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Public hearing to consider granting to the Hurt Investment
Company a sewer lateral easement in Peyton Drive public
right-of-way
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION:
LEGAL REVIEW: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
STAFF CO NT ACTCS):
Messrs. Tucker, Foley, Davis, Kamptner
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
BACKGROUND:
Hurt Investment Company ("Hurt") is constructing a building at 335 Greenbrier Drive near its intersection with
Commonwealth Drive. Sewer mains run along Greenbrier Drive and Peyton Drive. Peyton Drive is a County-owned
right-of-way, but it is currently not used for vehicular travel and is not within the state system of secondary highways.
Peyton Drive runs perpendicular to Greenbrier Drive and abuts the Hurt property on its southeasterly boundary. Hurt
needs to connect a 4-inch sanitary sewer lateral from the new building to a sewer main, and has requested that the
County grant a 20-foot easement into a portion of Peyton Drive that would allow the lateral to connect to the Peyton
Drive sewer main. A copy of the plat showing the location of the proposed easement and the relative locations of
Greenbrier Drive and Peyton Drive is attached as Attachment A. A map showing the location of the Greenbrier and
Peyton Drive sewer mains is attached as Attachment B.
STRATEGIC PLAN:
Goal 3: Develop Policies and Infrastructure to Address the County's Growing Needs.
DISCUSSION:
Virginia Code 9 15.2-1800 requires that the Board hold a public hearing prior to conveying any interest in County-
owned real property. The connection of the lateral to the Peyton Drive sewer main provides a proper fall for the lateral.
A proper fall cannot be provided for a lateral connecting to the Greenbrier Drive sewer main and connection is not
practical even with a pumping station. In addition, a concreted fiber optic cable runs along the same side of Greenbrier
Drive, which further complicates connecting to the Greenbrier Drive sewer main. Because of the noted problems
connecting the lateral to the Greenbrier Drive sewer main, County and ACSA staff advised Hurt to pursue extending
the lateral to the Peyton Drive sewer main. A copy of the proposed deed of easement is attached as Attachment C.
The easement will not affect the ability of Peyton Drive to be accepted into the state system of secondary highways.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that at the conclusion of the public hearing the Board approve the proposed easement and
authorize the County Executive to sign the deed of easement on behalf of the County.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Plat showino location of easement
B - Map showino location of sewer mains
C - Proposed deed of easement
"AQNWEAL TH DR
CQtJI\"\IE ROUTE 1315
51 70 R/W
~~~C:~ ~~c:-=~~
TAX MAP 61W PARCEL 03-3A ! ~ \ J
VANDER LINDE HOMES INC. , , I;
ZONED: RI5 RESIDENTIAL -------i I I
, I
---- i TMP 61W03-6AO i
E.L. HOLDINGS I
L. & E. PROPERTIES
DEED BOOK 3415 PAGE 609-612 I'
PROPERTY ZONED C-l
I
I
f:
II J
I I
I! I
II i ~
III 5
I'll I
<.!Jl.I...IWWUJUJ 3: 3:
~~~~~;""oru
II a: (T') fT1 LI1 ..... (1J ('fl U1
III ~Cowcoi--.~ir!i-rJ
. CIJ~~~ru~;U:-'
/1) OO1COfF1f'\J'"'TtDf'.
I ([V"(I')"'fO"'1'"
I OZUJUJ!J1lf)(f.)UJ
! 5 (T)O 0 Q'l<Il<IlO
0.6. 3.:11~P. 572 U~V.C:~~~~
WATERLINE ~ 8 rn G1 ~ ~ ~ ~
I EASEMENT ~ (\) ~ ~
III . . . .
'I DB. 34titjlp. 572~:g;n;nm;g~
I, FORCE MAIN ::'5 ru"':cti.D.n";";
1..L- LINE EASEMENT :i If) M C\J ~ C\J t-.. lD
: I \ >-
~ "'" ~\ ~
U.~N.H \ ~~~~~~g
1'1, 8' SAN SEWER \\ \ <t.......
t--....f',f'.COomQ)
Gj~;n::?p:rp
\\~~~ \ \
\\ a:~ ~ \ \
\\~~ \\ \
\\~ \\ \
,<" \\~ \\ \
& \ \\<0 \ \
\ \ \ \
\~ \
,n:: -..... \ \
pEYTON DRtv," \ 0-NEW 20 PRIVATE
60 \1/w) \ .J LATERAL EASEMENT
________--=~OOE~- \~
PLAT SHOWING NEW 20' PRIVATE LATERAL EASEMENT
IN THE CLOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PEYTON DRIVE
SCALE: l' = 40 ALBEMARLE COUNTY. VIRGINIA SEPTEMBER 4, 2007
DOMINION DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES, LLC REV CO. COMMENTS
NOVEMBER 9, 2007
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYING - LAND PLANNING
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
TAX MAP 5lW PARCEL 03-5
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
ZONED: C 1 COMMERCIAL
-_......,,~ - - - -
""\,\..\H OF' '"
...,,~'\:.- v./",
~~~ -?Q~
:l ~~
..0 H.
..u l>..
: TIMOTHY RAY MILLER :
~ Lie. No. 2065 :
. ,
~, (4 \)'0...~
" 1\10 S n\Jt.'\ ,,'"
" Un _"
'"........
KAR-AGL ~JHO
....----....
LOTB
BLOG UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
w
Lf) '<T
"'<.0
OJ "
'" '<T
Lf)'"
'"
(f)
'2-Q_.9_'.Slc.b.-,,--
6\
~
~~
~----
T.M. 61W PARCEL 03-6A 1
HURT INVESTMENT COMPANY
DEED BOOK 3414 PAGE 569-574
PROPERTY ZONED C1
IRON
Attachment A
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OESIGNATED AGENT
OA TE:
tf1
"
o
-
(\)
(\)
(\)
(J10000000
::;0000000
1-1 . . . . . . ,
aUlIDOOU"lOO
<(I.DO'llOlOC\JOlLO
a:1.D coco f.DCO
Will 0 r--.
UOO~
Z . . .
<tOOO1
~11l{\J~
Cfl
o
\.1J\.1J~
,...."'"
~:""'"':"T:r'
Z"'''<\I
Hru(11(\J
cr. . .
r'5~?iiftl
(I)CflZZ
w......(\J(T')
~UJWW
.J
Q: SUAVfY IALBE/IlAHLE\ iH5l.\rI\
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
PLANNING COMMISSION
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CHAIRMAN
DATE: ___
OESIGNATEO AGENT
DATE:
NOTES:
1. THE LAND USE REGULATIONS LISTED HEREIN ARE IMPOSED
PERSUANT TO THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE IN
EFFECT ON THIS DATE ANDARE SHOWN FOR INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
RUNNING WITH THE LAND AND THEIR APPEARANCE ON THIS
PLAT IS NOT INTENDED TO IMPOSE THEM AS SUCH.
2 PROPERTY IS NOT IN A HUD DEFINED 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONE BUT IS
LOCATED IN ZONE X AS SHOWN ON COMMUNITY PANEL 51003C027BO
3. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREIN IS NOT LOCATED IN AN
ALBEMARLE-CHARLOTTESVILLE WATER SUPPLY WATERSHED
OR AN AGRICULTURAL FORESTAL DISTRICT.
OWNERS APPROVAL:
THE EASEMENT DESCRIBED HEREIN IS WITH THE
FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRE OF THE
UNDERSIGNED OWNERS, PROPRIETORS AND/OR TRUSTEES. ANY
REFERENCE TO FUTURE POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS DEEMED AS
THEORETICAL ONLY. ALL STATEMENTS AFFIXED TO THIS PLAT
ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
STATE OF VIRGINIA.
TO WIT:
THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS
ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS
DAY OF
BY _~___________ __________
AS
OWNERS, PROPRIETORS AND/OR
TRUSTEES.
NOT ARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
CLOSED RIGHT OF WAY STANDING
IN THE NAME OF:
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
SHEET
OF 2
~~, .....",
,,\.\.- '\ H OF' ff,
..,~<v v./:',
~'o~ "'9QI~
if ~~
..0 t-i..
.U 1>-.
: TIMOTHY RAY MILLER :
~ LIe. No. 2065 :
.. ...
...., ('" \::;0..~
" 1\10 S RN'(.."- "
ff U _,
'",....,.-
VICINITY MAP
1" = 200'
REV CO. COMMENTS
NOVEMBER g, 2007
PLAT SHOWING NEW 20' PRIVATE LATERAL EASEMENT
IN THE CLOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PEYTON DRIVE
5C!\LE:: 1 ;;; 40' ALBEMARLE COUNTY. VIRGINIA FEBRUARY
DOMINION DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES, LLC
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYING - LAND PLANNING
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA
15, 2006
K(J.R-JHD--RGL
Q: 5'Jt.;VEY/A.l.B!TM6lw
--
\
Attachment B
I
..~
Attachment C
Draft: 02/05/08
This document was prepared by:
Albemarle County Attorney
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Tax Map 61 W (Peyton Drive right-of-way)
This deed is exempt from taxation under Virginia Code ~~ 58.1-811(A)(3) and 58.1-811(C)(4).
DEED OF EASEMENT
THIS DEED OF EASEMENT, is made and entered into on this
day of
, 2008, by and between the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE,
VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Grantor, hereinafter referred to
as the "County," and the HURT INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Virginia corporation, Grantee,
whose address is 195 Riverbend Drive, Charlottesville, Virginia, 22911, hereinafter referred to as the
"Grantee."
WITNESSETH:
That for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand paid, receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, the County does hereby GRANT and CONVEY with SPECIAL
WARRANTY to the Grantee, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, a sewer line lateral
easement and right-of-way (hereinafter, the "Easement") to construct, install, maintain, repair, replace
and extend a sewer line lateral consisting of pipes and appurtenances thereto, over, under and across
the real property of the County known as Peyton Drive in Albemarle County, Virginia, and more
particularly described as follows:
A sewer line lateral easement in the public right-of-way known as Peyton Drive, located
off of Greenbrier Drive in Albemarle County, Virginia, as shown on the plat prepared
by Dominion Development Resources, LLC, entitled "Plat Showing New 20' Private
Lateral Easement In The Closed Right-Of-Way Of Peyton Drive, Albemarle County,
Virginia", dated September 4,2007, (the "Plat"), identified as "New 20' Private Lateral
Easement. "
Reference is made to the Plat, a copy of which is attached hereto to be recorded herewith, for
the exact location and dimensions of the sewer line lateral easement hereby granted and the property
over which the Easement crosses.
This Easement shall be subject to the following:
1
Attachment C
Draft: 02/05/08
1. Location oflmorovements. The Grantee shall construct, install, maintain, repair,
replace and extend improvements (hereinafter, the "Improvements") only within the Easement. The
Improvements shall be underground.
2. Right to Enter; Ingress and Egress. The Grantee shall have the right to enter upon the
Easement for the purpose of installing, constructing, maintaining, repairing, replacing and extending
the Improvements within the Easement. The Grantee also shall have the right of ingress and egress
thereto as reasonably necessary to construct, install, maintain, repair, replace and extend the
Improvements. If the Grantee is unable to reasonably exercise the right of ingress and egress over the
Peyton Drive right-of-way, the Grantee shall have the right of ingress and egress over the property of
the County, if any, adjacent to the right-of-way.
3. Excavation and Restoration. Whenever it is necessary to excavate earth within the
Easement, the Grantee shall backfill the excavation in a timely, proper and workmanlike manner so as
to restore the surface conditions to the same condition as they were prior to excavation, including the
restoration of all paved surfaces that were damaged or disturbed as part of the excavation.
4. Vegetation and Obstructions. The Grantee may cut any trees, brush and shrubbery,
remove obstructions, and take other similar action reasonably necessary to provide economical and
safe installation, operation and maintenance of the Improvements. The Grantee shall replace or
reimburse the County for the cost of replacing or repairing any County-owned trees, brush, shrubbery
or obstructions that are removed or otherwise damaged in the installation, operation and maintenance
of the Improvements.
5. Ownership of Improvements. The Improvements shall be the property of the Grantee.
6. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The Grantee shall at all times indemnify and save
harmless the Grantor, its employees, agents, officers, assigns, and successors in interest from any
claim whatsoever arising from Grantee's exercise of rights or privileges stated herein.
2
Attachment C
Draft: 02/05/08
7. Obligations of the Grantee if and when Peyton Drive is Proposed for Acceptance or is
Accepted into the State-Maintained or Other Publicly-Maintained Street Svstem. If and when the
segment of Peyton Drive in which the Easement lies is proposed for acceptance or is accepted into the
state-maintained or other publicly-maintained system of highways, the Grantee shall comply with the
following:
a. Permits. The Grantee shall obtain all permits required by the Virginia
Department of Transportation (hereinafter, "VDOT") or such other public entity that becomes
responsible for the maintenance of Peyton Drive (hereinafter, "such other public entity") to authorize
the Improvements to exist or remain within the Peyton Drive right-of-way (hereinafter, the "Permits")
and shall comply with all applicable requirements ofVDOT or such other public entity.
b. Acts Required of Grantee to Assure Acceptance of Peyton Drive into State-
Maintained or Publicly-Maintained System. Until the Grantee quitclaims its interest in the Easement
to VDOT, such other public entity, or the County as required in conjunction with the acceptance of
Peyton Drive into the state-maintained or other publicly-maintained system, the Grantee, at its sole
expense, shall, promptly alter, change, adjust, relocate or remove the Improvements from the Peyton
Drive right-of-way ifVDOT or such other public entity determines that such alteration, change,
adjustment, relocation or removal is required in order for VDOT or such other public entity to accept
Peyton Drive into the system. Neither the County, VDOT, nor such other public entity shall be
responsible or liable to the Grantee or its successors or assigns for any costs associated with such
alteration, change, adjustment, relocation or removal of the then-existing Improvements. In addition,
neither the County, VDOT, nor such other public entity shall be obligated to compensate or reimburse
the Grantee or its successors or assigns for any increased or decreased cost or value associated with
either the Improvements or Peyton Drive resulting from such alteration, change, adjustment, relocation
or removal.
3
Attachment C
Draft: 02/05/08
c. Continuing Obligations of Grantee to the County. After VDOT or such other
public entity has issued the required Permits, the Grantee shall be subject to the following conditions,
notwithstanding any quitclaim of its interests to VDOT or such other public e1?-tity, and these
conditions shall be continuing obligations of the Grantee:
1. The Grantee, to the extent authorized by law, shall at all times indemnify
and save harmless the County, its employees, agents, officers, assigns, and successors in interest from
any claim whatsoever arising from the Grantee's exercise of rights or privileges stated herein.
2. In the event that the County or such other public entity becomes
responsible for the maintenance of Peyton Drive and the County or such other public entity requires,
for its purposes, that the Grantee alter, change, adjust, or relocate the Improvements, across or under
Peyton Drive, the cost to alter, change, adjust, or relocate the Improvements shall be the sole
responsibility of the Grantee. Neither the County nor such other public entity shall be responsible or
liable to the Grantee or its successors or assigns for any costs associated with altering, changing,
adjusting or relocating the then-existing Improvements as may be required herein. In addition, neither
the County nor such other public entity shall be obligated to compensate or reimburse the Grantee or
its successors or assigns for any increased or decreased cost or value associated with either the
Improvements resulting from such alteration, change, adjustment or relocation.
8. Covenants Running with the Land. The terms and conditions set forth herein shall be
covenants running with the land.
The County, acting by and through its County Executive, duly authorized by action of the
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on February 13,2008, does hereby convey the interest in real
estate made by this deed.
By its acceptance and recordation of this Deed of Easement, the Grantee acknowledges that it,
its successors and assigns, shall be bound by the terms herein.
4
Attachment C
Draft: 02/05/08
WITNESS the following signatures.
GRANTOR:
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
By:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in and for the
aforesaid City and State by Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, on behalf of the County of
Albemarle, Virginia, on this day of , 2008.
My commission expires:
Reg. No.:
Notary Public
GRANTEE:
HURT INVESTMENT COMPANY
By:
Name:
Title:
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in and for the
aforesaid Locality and State by , on behalf of the Hurt Investment
Company, on this day of ,2008.
My commission expires:
Reg. No.:
Notary Public
Approved as to form:
County Attorney
5
., ,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832
Fax (434) 972-4012
February 5, 2008
Judith Baker
1400 Owensville Road
Charlottesville, Va 22901
RE: SP2007-00047 Graceworks Expansion (Sign # 56)
Tax Map 58, Parcel 82
Dear Ms. Baker:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on January 15,2008, recommended approval
of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors by a vote of7:0.
Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. A maximum of 10 children shall be allowed on the site at any time.
2. A minimum of three adults shall supervise the children at all times.
3. The children shall be transported to and from the property as a group. The pick up and drop off of
individual children shall not be permitted except for medical, family and weather-related
emergencIes.
4. The days of operation shall be limited to four days per week, Monday through Thursday, and the
hours of operation shall be limited to 2:30 P.M. to 5:30 P.M. on the days of operation.
5. Expansion of the facilities for the private school shall require an amendment to this special use
permit.
6. Prior to all earth disturbing Prior to all earth disturbing activities 10,000 square foet or greater,
and/or for the excavation of a pond, and/or for the construction of a diX.!R, an Erosion & Sediment
permit shall bo required. Within thirty (30) days after the date of approval of Special Use Permit
2007-00047, the applicant shall submit a schematic concept plan of the property (the "Plan") in
a form acceptable to the Director of Planning that shows the existing and proposed locations of
the improvements and activity areas of the school and the existing and proposed locations of
agricultural activities not related to the school, including agricultural ponds, lakes, dams and
roads. The improvements, scale and location of the improvements and activity areas authorized
by Special Use Permit 2007-00047 shall be in general accord with the Plan. However, the
Zoning Administrator may approve revisions to the Plan to allow compliance with the Zoning
Ordinance.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive
public comment at their meeting on February 13,2008.
Attachment VII
\JO
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
SP 2007-47 Graceworks
AGENDA DATE:
February 13,2008
SUBJECTIPROPOSALIREQUEST:
Amend SP 2001-24 for an after school care program
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION:
Mr. Cilimberg and Ms. McDowell
LEGAL REVIEW: No
ATTACHMENTS:
Yes
REVIEWED BY:
Cilimberg
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission approved SP 2007-47 subject to the revision of a condition of approval (Condition
6.) recommended by staff related to a requirement for the applicant to obtain an Erosion and Sediment (E&S)
Plan for future grading over 10,000 square feet and/or for the excavation of a pond, and/or for the
construction of a dam. The Planning Commission acted in response to the applicant's concern that the
condition was unfair because land disturbing activities were not related to the after school program, but were
for other uses of the property. The applicant stated that the land disturbing activities that had taken place on
the property had been for agricultural purposes.
The Planning Commission asked that staff provide a revision to Condition 6. requiring a plan that showed the
locations of the children's activities. The requirements for E&S Plans would be in these areas only, as the
special use permit would only apply to after school program activities on the property. Thus, if the land
disturbing activities were for agricultural uses, they would not be subject to this condition.
Since the Planning Commission hearing, the applicant has submitted a concept plan depicting three areas on
the property showing the locations of the children's activities: fishing, garden, greenhouse, chicken coop,
basketball, animal husbandry, and vegetable production. (Attachment I). In addition to the plan, the applicant
submitted Graceworks brochures (Attachment II), a Farm Design Plan for Split Rock Farm (Attachment III),
and e-mail correspondence between Sally Thomas, Jonathan Baker and Mark Hopkins dated January 25,
2008, January 29, 2008, and January 30, 2008 (Attachment IV). Since the Planning Commission, the
applicant has also requested that Condition 1. be changed to increase the number of children permitted to
attend the program from 10 to 14 to correspond with the number of seats in their van which they are required
by Condition 3. to use to transport children to and from the site (Attachment V).
DISCUSSION:
Initially, SP 2007-47 included one parcel, TMP 58-82. During the review of the Graceworks application, it
was found that the applicants owned other, adjacent parcels. At staff's suggestion, the applicant added these
parcels (TMP 58-76B and TMP 58-77) to the Graceworks application in order to allow the after school
program activities to occur on all three parcels without violating the special use permit. During the staff
review, the separation of specific areas for the owner's private use from other areas for the after school
program were not considered. However, with the Planning Commission's recommendation and the nature of
the special use permit, staff acknowledges that connecting the E&S Plan to after school program activities is
appropriate. It should be understood that land disturbing activities on the property not connected with the
after school program will be subject to the normal requirements of the County in the Rural Areas.
Farm Design Plan
Split Rock Farm
January, 2008
Overview
The follo"wing document outlines the landscape planning projects that are designed for
Split Rock Farm. The principles of the proposed design are
. to include more productive, edible plants that will provide the farm with diverse
marketable products;
. to select plant varieties that do not require extensive inputs (~f water, fertilizer,
organic pesticides, or labor; and, finally,
. to utilize plant species that will contribute to the integrity of the farm ecosystem
by maintaining soil fertility, providing habitat for beneficial species, and
mitigating erosion and pollution,
Areas of Design
(See accompanying map for specific locations)
Site A
Located on the backside of the dam of the large pond.
This site is sunny, with unimpeded summer southern exposure, and has relatively loose,
loamy soil. Because the site is located furthest from the farm's center, low-maintenance
plants were prioritized in design considerations. This site will be planted with highbush
blueberries and Asian persimmons, two crops that need relatively few inputs, yet provide
bountiful and profitable yields. In terms of site preparation, the blueberries will require
peat moss to increase the acidity of the soil, and also bird netting fences to protect fruit
from avian pests. The persimmon trees should not require any soil amendments or
additional infrastructure. The entire area will be outfitted with irrigation lines, fed via
pump and gravity from the lake. The east side ofthe site, which slopes down steeply
toward the streambed will be planted in hay-scented ferns, which are native and grow
rapidly. The ferns will be instrumental in providing a groundcover for the sloping soil
and in preventing erosion.
Site B
The terraces located north of the small pond.
This site is surrounded by tall woods, and is lightly shaded in most areas for part ofthe
day. The topsoil found on this site is particularly rich, and will be used to supplement the
soil in other areas of the farm. As a result, the design of this site has been put on hold so
that the topsoil can be accessed for other projects. It is currently planted in annual
ryegrass to prevent erosion, improve soil fertility and add organic matter.
Site C
Located on the north-facing slope to the southwest of the small pond.
Attachment III
1
amended with any necessary nutrients once the results of the soil test come back. While
there is a hydrant located nearby, for the purposes of irrigation it would be preferable to
pump water up from the pond below. We will order seeds from Southern Exposure Seed
Exchange in February dependent upon the results of our CSA survey (to be distributed
among Jennifer's yoga students), and our own research and expertise.
Greenhouse
The farm already has an invaluable resource on-site in the form of a large, heated
greenhouse. In order to start seedlings in the greenhouse for use in the vegetable garden,
we will need to build greenhouse beds and tables for starting seeds, as well as buy a
quantity of potting mix and assorted other supplies (plant tags, sprayer bottles, 6-pack
plant pots etc.).
Chickens
Located between the preexisting vegetable garden and the parking area for the barn.
Chickens will be an integral part of food production at the farm, for their eggs, meat, and
their compost. Laying hens will be ideally situated close to the garden so that weeds and
insect pests (grubs, homworms, etc.) can be quickly and conveniently fed to them. This
use of the birds not only eliminates garden waste, but also provides them with high
quality plants and proteins to supplement their diet and enrich their eggs. Additionally,
the compost that the hens create by scratching through organic matter and adding their
own fertilizer is ideal for vegetable beds. The birds will be protected by portable
electrified "feather-netting", which both keeps the birds from escaping and deters
predators.
Phasing
The projects described above represent a serious investment in time, energy, and
resources-both financial and otherwise. It would be both expensive and unwise to
attempt to install all aspects of the above design immediately (particularly a 4-acre
vegetable garden!). The projects have been phased to create a manageable, streamlined
approach to the installation and maintenance of all the sites, and to minimize the initial
financial investment.
Phase I:
January, 2008--0ctober, 2008
1). Site F
. amend soil as recommended by soil lab for vegetables
. install irrigation pump and lines from small pond
. ongoing planting and maintenance...
2). Greenhouse
. purchase/build greenhouse supplies
. start seeds
3). Chickens
3
. turkeys?
. quail?
Phase III:
January, 2009-0ctober, 2009
1). Sites E & F
. plan out seed order
. assess soil needs with additional sampling
. other infrastructural improvements? Sheds? Tools? Other markets?
2). Greenhouse
. reassess plant offerings and order seeds
. assess greenhouse needs-supplies, soil, etc.
3). Site B
. soil amendments as determined by design and by soil test
. install irrigation, if necessary
. plant it!
4). All Sites
. OnQoinQ nlanninQ. maintenance. reassessment trouble-shootinQ. etc.
Jonathan Baker
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Jonathan Baker
Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:09 AM
'Sally Thomas'
Mark Hopkins; 'bakergraceworks@earthlink.net'
RE: SP2007 - 0047 Graceworks Expansion
r"L.. t' I. 0 n .oCt C'J. '(J. 3/
~ .-+-'/'7. t J- u. I
(J I ~, / _ \" f e h,~C71 I I
-;-/7 \:"" -1'/ { .J
Hello Sally:
Julie and I appreciate your thoughtful response. Your criticism about the erosion was
fairly put. If I were doing the project over, I would have done many things differently.
There was sediment and silt released into the stream that would have been avoided with
different/better E & S control measures - along the lines you suggested. I did not know
that the county was reticent to recommend stricter E&S control - either we made them
feel we didn't care or want to hear it - or they, absent the authority to enforce it, may
have felt it would be a waste of time. I relied on advice from those who did not have
the stream's well being at the top of their list. At the center of this also seems to be a
breakdown in communication and transparency.
As you seem to allude to, this is not an obvious process to navigate as a private citizen.
In the very beginning I discovered that most contractors were loath to do proper
permitting and were replete with tactics to avoid county, state & federal regulations -
which, by the way, are hard to align. Most everyone's mindset was "What business is it
.)f theirs? If you want to avoid trouble, say little." Nevertheless, I told mine I was going
to do it by the book (notifying the county, DEQ and the Corp in advance) and I also told
him about my neighbor's concerns for the stream, etc. I don't know that it had much
impact on how he did the job. Early on, Mark Hopkins politely cautioned me about the
contractor but I didn't listen as carefully as I should have. I was pretty enamored with
this contractor and some work he had just completely for the Kluge Estate. I felt lucky
to get 00 his schedule. He is a very talented excavator, E&S lapses notwithstanding.
I was traveling a lot during the construction, but I don't recall the county trying to reach
me with questions and concerns - it is possible they visited the site directly and were
"brushed off." But, like your visit with Julie, we would have welcomed it and taken any
advice/direction seriously whether or not it was within "jurisdiction." DEQ was quite
involved but had limited direction for us as to how to improve the site - that's why they
sent us to Tamara.
Regardless, I feel badly about how the whole thing unfolded. The only consolation is the
vision of the thing - a functioning, organic farm that makes it easier for people to eat
locally and demystifies food production. (If you haven't read the Omnivores Dilemma,
you might enjoy it - it is an intelligent read on the subject.) Ultimately, I am hopeful the
county, my neighbors and my family will be proud of a community farm. But as to
doubts about whether or not we are serious about the farming - they will only be laid to
rest when there is produce to show for it. I accept the "burden of proof" rests with me
so I will submit to Joan McDowell an outline of what we will be planting where (cash
permitting). Bear in mind, neither my brother-in-law nor I can make our living from this
1
Attachment IV
required either by our own ordinances or by state guidelines, and are having good success in the last year in getting
proffers for construction projects to catch 80% of the silt, for example, when a 60% standard is the highest used by state
regulations. So it's frustrating to have a construction project do a mediocre job when we ordinarily get a better product
For example, digging a pond in the midst of a stream while it's still flowing through the area simply would not be allowed if
the County had the ability to regulate it. The stream should not flow through the area during construction, so that it's a dry
construction site, as this keeps all the in-stream erosion and siltation from happening. I don't blame you for the process
that you used and for the advice that you received, but perhaps you can understand that it was frustrating for staff and
neighbors and me to have to watch a project that seemed to be a home site enhancement but because it was called
"agricultural", it proceeded without the erosion safeguards that the usual home site enhancement would-have. The most
commercial, big box construction, would have had tighter controls over construction side-effects.
That is the history as I see it, possibly full of misperceptions, but I am being forthright with you.
If the history could be put aside, then I think you have a legitimate question about whether the fact of having Graceworks
on your property should open your property to the controls that staff has suggested for your land-moving activities,
apparently tied to an impression that you are not truly farming. I think you can show the farming activities, maybe
delineated on a plat, and maybe the board will agree that the agriculture exemption should still apply. I don't want to
handicap a valuable program for children, and I don't want to handicap farming activities - and I'm quite sure my fellow
board members would agree with me. The experience of the pond casts a shadow over your reputation for having good
judgment about earth-moving activity of an agricultural type - I think that harsh statement is the bottom line. I believe that
you can improve that reputation by showing the mitigation that I think you're doing and your farming activities that are on a
small scale, and the erosion-impact plans you may have. You possibly have a better farming story to tell than almost any
other farmers. But because of the pond experience, you're going to have to tell that story, unlike all the other farmers.
I've spent several days on this letter because it's hard to both praise a person and criticize him, all in one missive. But I
hope what I've written is helpful, as that is my intention.
Feel free to respond and/or telephone.
Sally
From: Jonathan Baker [mailto:JBaker@inpracticegroup.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 7:49 PM
To: Sally Thomas; Mark Hopkins
Cc: chgardens@earthlink.net; bakergraceworks@earthlink.net
Subject: SP2007 - 0047 Graceworks Expansion
Hello Sally (and Mark):
I write regarding the hearing on February 13th regarding SP2007 - 0047 Graceworks
Expansion. Though the department of community development has expressed their
support (and recommendation) for the permit, they went on to seek a requirement that:
we get an erosion and sediment permit for land disturbance over 10,000 feet, even if-
the disturbance is for "agricultural use," and reduce the number of children from' 15 to
10.
On the face of it, the first request is not a problem because A: We want to protect the
stream as much as anyone. B: We do not have of any other large scale land
disturbance that need to occur on the land and C: even with the construction of the pond
we sought County guidance on E&S measures and followed them (to my knowledge, no
one contests this*). We have always practiced E&S procedures, and were not cited by
the county, DEQ or the Corps for not having them in place.
However, if we begin to till our large lower field - theoretically any time we turn the soil
for food production we would need to call the county. Do other farms have this
requirement? Why is the topic of E&S measures being linked to the Graceworks, an
afterschool program for underprivileged children in our community program? My organic
farm activities have little (almost nothing - the children fished in the pond once!) to do
with Graceworks. Though the kids do get out and about on the land, their garden is the-
3
especially th@se~-uck in the trailer park by the Rock store (these are Agnor Hurt
studehts - .slated to benefit from Graceworks' expansion), to enjoy the outdoors in a
constrwttiwe, positive environment.
No one is debating the value of or importance of Graceworks, but the county appears to
be impeding its continued success with these, at best tangential, and in our view
unsubstantiated, issues around our avoiding E&S procedures. After this past hearing,
my wife and I asked ourselves "Is it [Graceworks] worth it?" We were sort of thinking the
County should be encouraging us for getting involved in the lives of these kids - rather
than using the program as the opportunity to vent about E&S issues.
My past conversations with both of you have been constructive and positive, so I am
reaching out to see if you have any advice or concerns in advance of the hearing.
Please let me know if you would like to meet or talk.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Baker
*In October 2006, there was one day where silt was discharged into the stream - a huge
lapse in judgment on the part of the contractor's employee. Had I been there, I would
have stopped it. DEQ and the Corp visited and spoke directly with the contractor about
this, Other sediment was a function of several unusually large storm systems that
moved through - DEQ said that no E&S measures can fully address erosion when that
happens. Further, we asked the county to visit the site and give us their
recommendations. Tamara did come out, had two recommendations (which we
implement that day) but told my brother-in-law that we were doing things correctly.
5
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY
Project Name: SP 2007-47 Graceworks Staff: Joan McDowell, Principal Planner
Planning Commission Public Hearing: Board of Supervisors Public Hearing:
January 15, 2008 February 13, 2008
Owner: Judith Bailes Baker Applicant: Julie Baker
Acreage: 58.469 Special Use Permit: Section 10.2.2 (5) private
schools
TMP: TMP 58-82; TMP 58-76B; Existing Zoning and By-right use:
TMP 58-77 RA -- Rural Areas: agricultural, forestal, and
Location: 1040 Owensville Road fishery uses; residential density (0.5 unit/acre
Magisterial District: Samuel Miller Conditions: Yes
DA (Development Area): Requested # of Dwelling Units: NA
RA (Rural Areas): X
Proposal: Amend SP 2001-24 for a private Comprehensive Plan Designation: Rural Areas
school to expand the days of operation from 2 - preserve and protect agricultural, forestal, open
days/week to 4 days/week and to Increase space, and natural, historic and scenic resources/
enrollment density (0.5 unit/ acre)
Character of Property: partially wooded, fields, Use of Surrounding Properties: residential on
pond, stream, residences varied sized lots, agricultural
Factors Favorable: Factor Unfavorable:
1. The proposed additional children enrolled in 1. Land disturbing that is related to activities
the after school care program would provide a for the children has resulted in stream
service to the community. sedimentation.
2. The proposed additional days of operation
from two days per week to four days per week
would not compromise the integrity of the
community or the Rural Area.
3. No additional structures would result from the
proposed expansion.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this Special Use Permit with conditions.
SP _ 2007_47_ Graceworks _PC_Report
Attachment VI
1
Commercial Entrance - A commercial entrance was required by Virginia
Department of Transportation when a commercial riding / boarding stable was
contemplated by the property owner. The commercial entrance was constructed, but
the commercial stable was not and is not under consideration at this time.
SP 2001-24 Baker After School- approval of a private school after school operation
for 15 children, 2-days per week. The conditions of approval are included in the
conditions recommended with SP 2007-47 Graceworks.
Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan: Comprehensive Plan designates the
subject property as Rural Areas emphasizing the preservation and protection of
agricultural, forestal, open space, and natural, historic and scenic resources as land
use options. The after school care provides an exposure for children to the County's
rural areas and gives them experiences with agricultural activities.
STAFF COMMENT:
Staff addresses each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance:
31.2.4.1: Special Use Permits providedfor in this ordinance may be issued upon a
finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial
detriment to adjacent property,
The after school care program has not received any zoning complaints since its
inception in 2001. However, land disturbance activities related to building ponds,
fields, and roads have resulted in erosion that precipitated neighbor complaints.
Since the land disturbances were claimed as agricultural activities, they were exempt
from the County's Water Protection Ordinance. Recent site visits have confirmed
the extent of the ongoing grading activities. No evidence was observed to indicate
that the ponds and fields have any existing commercial agricultural use. The
applicant has indicated that they are considering planting orchards in some of the
graded areas. However, the graded areas appear to be an integral part of recreational
activities for the residences and the school. Staff has offered a condition of approval
that would link future land disturbing activities with a requirement to obtain County
Erosion and Sediment Control permits, a mechanism that would provide mitigation
for any more stream buffer disturbances. In addition, the County would be able to
assist the property owners with appropriate E & S practices, prior to their
commencement. These E & S mitigation measures would also give the children an
opportunity to learn more about methods of protecting our water supply.
that the character of the district will not be changed thereby and
The number of children attending each day would remain at the existing 10 children.
As the transportation for the children will be provided by private van and most of
the activities are be on the interior of the parcel, the additional days of operation are
not anticipated to adversely affect the district.
that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance,
Section 18, Chapter 10 of the Zoning Ordinance outlines the purpose of Rural Areas
zoning: "This district (hereafter referred to as RA) is hereby created and may
hereafter be established by amendment of the zoning map for the following
purposes:
-Preservation of agricultural and forestal lands and activities;
-Water supply protection;
-Limited service delivery to the rural areas; and
SP _ 2007_47_ Graceworks _ PC_Report
3
3. The children shall be transported to and from the property as a group. The pick up and
drop off of individual children shall not be permitted except for medical, family and
weather-related emergencies.
4. The days of operation shall be limited to twe four days per week, Monday through
Thursday, and the hours of operation shall be limited to 2:30 P.M. to 5:30 P.M. on the
days of operation.
5.Expansion of the facilities for the private school shall require an amendment to this
special use permit.
6j~ppro'/al by the Health Department for the private school shall be required prior to
commencemeRt of the private school.
6. Prior to all earth disturbinlr activities 10,000 square feet or greater, and/or for the
excavation of a pond. and/or for the construction of a dam. an Erosion & Sediment permit
shall be required.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - SP 2007-47 Graceworks application
Attachment B - Location map
Attachment C - Site photographs
Attachment D - SP 2001-24 Baker After School Care staff report with conditions
of approval
SP _ 2007_47_ Graceworks]C _Report
5
Section 31.2.4.1 of the Albemarle iUnty Zoning Ordinance states that, "Th jard of supervisors hereby
reserves unto itself the right to issue all speciaI use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for
uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the board of supervisors that such use
will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, that the character of the district will not be
changed thereby and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this ordinance, with
the uses permitted by right in the district, with additional regulations provided in section 5.0 of this
ordinance, and with the public health, safety and general welfare."
The items that follow will be reviewed by the staff in their analysis of your request. Please complete this
form and provide additional information which will assist the County in its review of you request. If you
need assistance filling out these items, staff is available.
How will the proposed special use affect adjacent pro_~
TJ- s~d f,~ /10 .. d-
rC~l~~
0("\
a:dj' 6CsJ--
I
-
How will the proposed special use affect the character of the district(s) surrounding the property?
Nu +J I -
How is th~in hann.ony with the..purpose and intent .of the Z.oning Ordinance?
I A-, 7 Y rn ' -\- u. ~cd fc- .>2tP c...r-.tA
o ~ ~jLQC,~ P:'"..:::.t ~ o..tl"",J lor a. ). Jo-I
~~f~ ie b ~ L{ d~ pro1rc!. A
How is !!te~~ in harmony with the uses permitted by right' ~e dis~ct?
\~ 0 ,~ \ dV
~
aJ--4>s- sc..J.-o ~~
~ CoWu.;t.C ~ (tw€-~
(0 l"Y' \ .
What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 .of the Zoning Ordinanc pply t.o this use?
nc~
t,O) W~ ~,~'> i ~cA,~-('r.Ltf '-Y--
.Q.[\r~ ~d'.r"\i--.P) ~~-Jo( ~A ~).f-1-.. G(
O\\.~ s ~:d' 0.. ~~ . ~ ~~L'f~ 1'('. r~'~
J .q+(~&. o...d-\u\~.....oS" M(Q. f\~kh", Po.._~,,-~8m06~~e~:~4^3_
I~ -, f'(
=
ATTACHMENT A
""
,,/
/'J Roads 0 Water Body
/ f~ Streams c=J Parcels
-
0::1
f-<
Z
~
:I:
u
.-r'
"""',
,
u
....
c:
Q)
E
.r::
u
III
~
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
Joan D. McDowell
August 28, 2001
Revised for the
September 19,2001 Meeting
SP 01-24 Baker After School Care Pro2:ram
Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed a private school
program for 10 to 15 children between the ages of six and eleven years. The
applicant's representative has advised that the children will be selected from
two elementary schools, Meriwether Lewis and Greer, and that participation
will be based on economic factors. The children will be transported to the
site by a privately owned van or by a school bus on its regular route. They
will be taken home by the van. The hours of operation will be from 2:30
P.M. to 5:30 P.M. on Tuesdays and Thursdays during the school year. The
children will participate in the care of farm animals, riding, crafts and
general agricultural activities under the supervision of three adults. Indoor
activities will take place inside a two-story combination barn, house and
offices currently under construction.
Petitions: Request for special use pennit to allow a private school for 10-15
under-privileged children two days per week between the hours of 2:30 P.M.
and 5:30 P.M., in accordance with Section 10.2.2.5 of the Zoning Ordinance
which allows for private schools. The property, described as Tax Map 58
Parcel 82, contains 40.055 acres, and is located in the Samuel Miller
Magisterial District on the west side of Route 676 and north of Route 250 at
1040 Owensville Road. The property is zoned RA, Rural Areas. The
Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Rural Area.
Character of the Area: The area is characterized by a mixture of
residential and agricultural uses. The Meriwether Hills subdivision is on the
opposite side of Owensville Road and the Lewis Hill West subdivision is on
the north side of the property. The subject parcel is generally wooded, with
the building currently under construction in a cleared area in the center of
the site.
Plannin2: and Zonin2: Historv:
November 1998 - A one-lot subdivision of 6.73 acres, leaving 4
development rights
Attachment 0
..
that the character of the district will not be chan2:ed thereby,
The existing structure is not visible from the road and activities of the
children would be consistent with agricultural activities in the RA.
and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this
ordinance,
The proposed private school would be in harmony with the ordinance, as the
applicant has requested and recommended conditions of approval would
ensure minimal impact on the property and the area.
with the uses permitted by ri2:ht in the district,
The proposed maximum of fifteen children, under supervision, two
afternoons a week would not conflict with uses permitted by right in the
district.
with additional re2:ulations provided in Section 5,0 of this ordinance,
No regulations provided in Section 5.0 of the zoning ordinance apply to
private schools.
and with the public health, safety and 2:eneral welfare.
The children will be under supervision and the applicant or the school
system will provide transportation. The public health, safety and welfare
would not be endangered.
SUMMARY:
Staffhas identified the following factors favorable to these applications:
1. The proposed private school would provide a service to the community.
2. The proposed private school of this scale would not compromise the
integrity of the community or the Rural Area.
""
:3 elt 'I
- I 5f(jN
.:. Department of Building Code ~
TMP'-o 2. ~ 2. [) - Jd 0 - 0
3M
,Application for Special Use Permit
County of Albemarle
OFFICE E LY
SP#
Attachment 0
Mag. Disl.
Staff
O_J)~d-OD_
. Date I ~lJV.-~
Sign#
Project Name (how shoo"! we refer to lhis applicalion'!)
Baker After School Program
*ExistingUse Rural/Barn Use
Proposed Use see attachment
*Zoning District RA *Zoning Ordinance Section number requested 10, z. , 2-. 5
(*staff will assist you with these items) 11f/rATE 5CJ./cxU..>
Number of acres to be covered by Special Use Permit (ifn porliooit lIIust be delinented un pin!) barn & surrounding area
Is this an amendment to an existing Special Use Permit?
Are you submitting a site development plan with this application?
o Yes~ No
o Yes~ No
L{.{).Ofob
d-Cre ~
j- Contact Person (Whom should we call1wrile concerning lhis projecl?): Joseph M. Cochran
Address P. 0, Box 559
Ci~ Charlottesville
State VA
Zip 22902
Daytime Phone (804 ) 977-8590
Fax # 817-5212
E-mail jmc@richfish.com
Owner of land (As listed inlhe County's records):
Julie Baker
Fax #
CityCharlottesvillEState VA Zip 22901
E-mail N / A
Address 1400 Owensville Road
Daytime Phone (804 ) 293-7458
N/A
Applicant (Who is lheconlacl person representing? Who is requesling lhc special use~): Jonathan and Julie Baker
Address 1400 OwenRvi 11 e Road
CityCharlottesv::i..lleState VA
Zip 22901
Daytime Phone ( 804 ) 293-7458
Fax#
N/A
E-mail N/A
Tax map and parcel 58-82 \
_\ 040 D Lc) e..lL~y \ l c g..ct
Location of property (landmarks, intersections, or other)
Physical Address (ifassigned)
Does the owner of this property own (or have any ownership interest in) any abutting property? If yes, please list
those tax map and parcel numbers 58-76
OFFICE USE ONLY -:::IQ"J\.I/O
Fee amount $ T OU
. History: 0 Special Use Permits:
~~,o,4 0 Variances:
Date Paid
& / /rs-J &i Check # ~ 59 leS Receipt # 'w tf5 By: 5#-
I (
o ZMAs and Proffers:
Q f5 f)L ..., kif <;J I ~
f""\..Io"'Pttf'T nf Allthnri,."tinn
If Co. _
Attachment 0
;i
Section 31.2A.lofthe Albema.rle> (2bunty 'Zoning Qrdirianc:e'sta.te&tl:raf, . ";Fhe.board ofshpervisors
hereby .reserve~~nt~itselftheT!ght tqslssu~,fllI ..specialuseperfP1ts';petInitteq:'he~ellnder'S,peCial Use
'~f:rmits for uses as proyidedinthis'orqinaI1ce, ma,y bejssued..uponafindiIlgbYthebPard(jfs9P~p'isors
tha,tsuch use will ,not be of substantia .1 detrimentto adjacent property, that the character ofthedistribt
\VilI~otbe:hange~t~er:by .and that sUC:~,us:wilIb~ in. harmo~y with thegul}Joseapg iI1te,ntWth~s
ordiIHlnce, withtheuses'perniitted bYTi~~ti~t~e.district,. with additional.re,gulationsprovidedirlsectidn
5.0 of this ordinance, ana with thepublic:;healtl1;safetyandgeneralwelfare;
The items which folIow'wi.llbe reviewegl?ythestaif in their anal~sisofyour request. Please cOIIlplete
this for~ and proYideaddit~o~a,1 informa,tiop .w~ichwi1Iassisttheqounty jnjts. review of your request.
If you need assistance filling out these items,staffis availa~le.
What is the Comprehensi ve Plan designation for this prop~ny?
How will the proposed special use affect adjacent property? It will not' affect ad;ac'eil)1W property.
The use will be conducted at a barn facility which is out of sight from most
adjacent properties.
How will the proposed special use affect the character of the district surrounding the property? The us e will no t
affect the character of the district surrounding the property~
Howis the use in harmony withthepufpose and intentO{theZoningOrdinance? The use will be conducted
in such a way as tominim.izetheimpact on surrotiriding1>roperties, It will be
a use-that fills a need while be.irig compatible with surrounding properties.
How is the use in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district? The use will serve a small
number of children which is in keeping with the rural and residential uses
of surrounding properties,
What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 ofthe Zoning Ordinance apply to this use? None,
How will this use promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community? The use will provide
a
after school ro ram to a small number of need children in a settin
that is both beautiful and isolated from its neighbors such that its impact on
surrounding properties will be non-existant.
//"'.
P=I
f-<
ffi
~
u
<r::
f-<
f-<
<r::
"
-5 ::2: qr
?ll"'u6OH
If)
f-
a
.-l
''''-,
''''-,
''''-,
''''-,
'",-
'<t
f-
a
.-l
---
//
"j
,/
./
./
./
./
./
/
/
./
~.~ ~
"!
\
,
\
,
\
\
,
,
\
,
,
\
,
,
\
\
()
I-
()
..J
g ~~l
in &,.o-!!
~ ~~~
::i"'ci.ci.<l..
x.ll!llQI';
..niXiX-Q1Q
:J::~<!j<!j<!j
~...QQQ
"
:;)
c
:&
r-
:tiS
.o~~ci.
r- -l !l.
'~~~
:Ror-'"
~i~~
"'-,
''''-''
:!
f-
a
.-l
--------------
~
f-
a
.-l
- ---.
- - ---.
~
f-
a
.-l
,00 'Os,
J. 20. 2
<.22".
./
---
11
:&
r-r-
~B!l~
7~~
:rg ~(
'\ lA~i
\Q
~
"\ ,-------
\,
I
~
I
I
',-
-.......
-.......
-.......
7
I
I
\
o ~uaw4:>enV'
i ~
en
;, ~ ~ I
;.. Iii
: ~ -J
!~ ~ ~
'............
""~
~~
v,~""'
~""'
~:l
<hl
IT ''''s!
r-...,~
~~-ci.
~~-
~b~~
-jCl '
~ ~
;!;
II)
~i1~~
l~t~t
J..t-"tN
-~<!j<<i
QS:!iQQ
I /
I "
Ly(
/"~
"
--.......
'---7
/
----
~
o 8
;: -
,
,
'"
..J
<,
w"
/
,
/ iil
/
,
/
\ "
----/
, 1
/1
" I
/ (
, ')
/
/
--- \
--1-'---,--
" \ ", -----
\ '\
"
\
\
\
\
\
I
~N
II N~t!
~'-1
~~:ill;
/ :IlQ,:!!!
/ ~]~
, /
"y
( "
I "'-,
/ '",
I ",
/ D
./ ~ ~:;}
./ F ~
./ ~r--/1)::
./ ~ z:!rnl!=
, , ./ -9- ::J lici..ci..
" '- ./ ~:::r-_~~ -
~ ./ ~ """ I,o<\l_
- - - Il) .J\~.!. f-l'lLl)>O
I!:' I ,Q Iiill III <\l r--,o
ID~:l:l~~~ gIQIQIQ
~ Q'N ...JDDD
~l'l
aj
---__ a
-----
i!i
~ ,
~
,
,
~
:;)
hl
=.l ~ ()
'.g~
:R1li3 ci.
h<<i~
61:.
Q III
Cl
,
'\
'\
,
d~
~B z_.!
! ~ g II
(J'J ~!I:i!
~ 0 o. I
~ O( ,
c1d1",Z ,
~ ~;iI
o .>i!i
~I ~~ Ii
~ :: 51
~ ~I
.I
//"/'
,/'
,/'
/'
/"
,,/,-
/
//
'"
"
..
"
m
"
,
'"
"
:)
r
!~
i
~ "I, i
~~8"~~
uJ?~~
cr~~3~
~;r~~~
I ,,<o.u:
=Ul <Il 0 I
-,,-' ~=5'
~i~~~ai
~O~~-a"
~El~~i
o.l:lUlli q
~ g ~<~~
1~~tT5'
~g~ il
:>
1]
~
()
X
i
:>
nl
ill
iJ
z
<J.
:>
ill
m
:>
CJm
') x
<ii
<Il~
"
cD
Attachment 0
,-
I SKETCH SHOWING BARN LOCATION
: FOR SP 01-24 BAKER AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM
LOCAlED OFF STATE ROUrE 676
SAMUEL MILLER MAGISTERIAL OISTRICr
AL8ElIIARLE [OLJ~.Ty. 'JijJGHf:.l
---....,
'-....
"-",,-
--....
../
:
!
j
i
I
f
i
i
i
i
~g:
\J
pl
::i\J
Y1rom--l
~~~~
~gQ\II
-' 0.0.
~l:l \f ~
~~~~
--'-'
-Q
R
--.........-
-.........
.'.........
.-.........
.'.........-
....<'<'-~-.
O<,?-'_
150.........._
-00' .........
--.........
--.........
.'..........
-.........-
~~ ,/
0/
,
/
/
/'
/'
/
/' ___d_________
_------/----' _ddd_______
~ - . . -. .
._0- .."
--------.-------.------ - .-----
---- 0
-/' ~q
/'
/
/'
/
/
~
u
=
~
..
u
..
u
.3L os
(J~ / :/
";P ,
~;/ :
;r;~ ,:
~Ji :
;;;1$ !
"
" /
, ,
: i
, ; ,
. : '
, . .
, ,
r :
... i
.:' I....
! i
/ .
i~
>
i] r:-l I
i ~ "i !J5 "I
j . - ~
i I\J u ;-r""
i 0 II:~ I I
)>11
z)>
\Jill
-71
<z
:><J.
z"
~
~~<.J!,-5'
~CJ~Q.x
::it-JI0~
Y1226\l
~~~~~
. U1CJl1
ii\~'il(lQ
t. ~~
..JUI ') ~
Ulcr- \)l
-'10 t-J
~:o
F4-o
~~
\II
(\
:>
~
~
~~
~:
1
\ "",
~~
\ '
~~
\ ,
~\
~\
,I,'
,I'
/
/
,I'
/
,I"
,I'
,I'
/
,I'
,.1'
~[
F
* /o(a"netl.
C---
91~ ~10NTICELL[t RDAO
CHARlDTTESVILLE, V!RG,
INC .1
I
I
I
I
ROUDABUSH, GALE &. ASSOC.,
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS
LAI,O PLANNERS
~'c.>~lll2
.
E
o
V)
V)
o
--.
(:Q
V)
u
.-
~
OJ)
c
.-
0-
---
Q)
-r
Q)
u
((J
~
()
,
ii"J. ......'" ""." ",. ..", ~'d~_ "ff _.. .
.;;;;
.:.co",.'",';;'.j- "" ..~ ...; ""~.
~
--...
~
-~
~
~
00
l!)
~
I
rf')
0\
N
""""
'<:j<
rf')
'<:j<
'-'
.
~
rl
~ ~
N .~
N ~
('j {j
:S ~
OJ:)~
.~ 8
:> Ir)
c,)' 13
::::I H
...... OJ
:> 1;5
r.Il '5'0
C,) OJ
:jj H
o r;j
~ .:a
('j C/)
..c: ~
u ~
. OJ
u
"d ~
('j c..?
o
~
C,)
......
......
'S;:
r.Il
t::
C,)
~
o
o
'<:j<
o
rl
"
.~
(4.
.
0'> ">- 0'>
.~ "- .f
--0 +-
01- o c: <lJ <lJ 01-
01- 0:> E 0 '3,f If)
Q) 'C, ~
!: ~ .J; .- -D O~ >
.~ +- c: If) "-
0 .c: c:( =' 0
+- .!2 ::t. ::t.
~ .Q.. ~ 0:>
\- <lJ c-
O'> U '-
c: O'l .:2 u ~
.~ o .f 4-.. :::t
0 0
0 o C .I.... V)
0 c U
u 5'0. Q Q)
s..:- O) V) 0 .f
l'Cl -c: 0
CD .f O'l -e f u
..c. c: 0 r:
'0 .!Q 32: 0 0
0 "-
0 0 LL. 0 0. Q
..c: CI') (!l s
u LQ
(fl
~
p",O
V)
(().'"
o
_.
r.o
II)
'-0'.
,.-,
'~
:0).
~.
.0.-
,.-,-' '
'. ~
j:.
~
a.
=
....
=
z
Cl) OJ
ca:>c:
... CO.:.:2
~..c::c
~ ~ g>
-:E$3:.:a
:> c: ::l ..:
.;: co u Cl)
E 'ff.5 tl
~.- ~ 0
_~~Ul
Cl) co .- -0
... o..~ c:
~Cl)t)co
6:5 co OJ
r- ... c:
...!!l 8:c
co 'iU -0 .!!l
c: ~"5 -
o -0 0
-0 c: .....
-8 co 0
[g ~ ~
o c: c:
....J& -a
dl
..c: .5
.Sl c:
..c: Cl)
~ -0 u
... ::l
E co -0
co OJ 0
... c: ...
OJ.- 0..
8$30
0.. ~ 0
coB~
EO.]
:3cco
.Sl 0 OJ
... Ul c:
~] 'E
c: co ...
co ..c: ~
Ul Ul 0..
'-..gj Cl)
::C::l Cl)
I _ ..c:
"" u Ul
.5
:: ,-
0 ~
.- Ul
.... ~
= ...
U ~
=
"'Cl Cl)
u
'-U co
...
0
-
0
ell
...
::l
Cl) Ul
:g c:
:> ell ..:
o Ul co
o.E<~
o ell
........c:o
.!!l ~ ~
--;;:::..c:u
IV ...... ,Ul
o '......
OJ ... ::l
0_
0.. Ul
0.. Ul
::l Cl)
Ul tl
...... ::l
c: Ul
-8 co
Ul
.U)
c:
o
u
Z'
'2 -0
::l c:
...... co ..:
,I-<
0 ell co
0.. u ell
0.. c: .>.
0 co cd
-0
ell Cl) ell
..c: :> u
...... 1
f/J ell .:;::
co
.... :> ell
a. cd ... E
<C ..c: u ...
- - 0
~ ~ 0 -
...
E Cl)
.c Ul 0..
Eo- -0 ...
-8 -0
;,;c c:
co co
~ Cl) co
ell .Sl
Cl) E
~ ......
u co
co co ...
Cl) 0.-0
u 0
c: ......
0
c:
Cl)o
... 0
:g..c:
:c 1;;
u
1ilca
.C;; .0
UlCl)
co 0..
Ul
-0
C
cd
~
...
o
~ :3
Cl)o
E .
o Ul
..c:u
.!:::: Cl)
Cl) B
..c: ...
...... 0.
..c:
......
'3
-
-
co
......
Ul
Cl)
..c:
f-
..
..
AGNOR-HURT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
3201 Berkmar Drive
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Telephone (434) 973-5211
Fax (434) 974-7046
January 2, 2008
Dear Members of Albemarle County Board of Supervisors and the
Zoning Commission,
My name is Sue Tansey, and I am the Bright Stars Family
Coordinator at Agnor-Hurt Elementary School. I am writing to
give support to the expansion of the GraceWorks program to
include Agnor-Hurt students. I have been familiar with this
program for the past six years, through contacts at Greer
School. I have learned about the program by talking to Greer
staff members and to some children and their parents who have
benefited from the program. All reviews of GraceWorks that I
have heard have been overwhelmingly positive. Parents and
teachers rave about the quality of the care, instruction, support,
and activities that Julie Baker and her staff members give the
children. They see the program as offering a unique opportunity
for these students. I would very much like to see GraceWorks be
offered as a long-term program for Agnor-Hurt students, also.
As an ACDSS family support worker based at this school I
work closely with many children and their families, One of the
main gaps in services for our children is the lack of affordable
after-school programs. Many of the children I serve are not well
supervised at home after school, and they lack stimulating
"UTa T=vnprt Success"
..
activities and help with homework. Most live in neighborhoods and
trailer parks without safe places to play, so they do not get
outside exercise and recreation, I believe GraceWorks is exactly
the kind of program our children need, and I heartily endorse
their involvement with it.
Please approve GraceWorks' expansion, and support this much-
needed program in our county.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
bx:J
Sue Tanse~
Bright Stars Family Coordinator
~
.
~. . ~~W~
310 MJ&1 ~~L~ ~Jll~.
~vli1; ;l,?( fo ~ Sl&
December 30,2007 ZZ-C( /) / I ~ v/\ z ~ if J
:r/A.d~ Grove(
Jt50 L~.s L.11.e...-
(hvi!(L V~ ~lfDJ
. j~ fl. c;~
Dear Albemarle County Planning Commission and Board of Supervj,;s, I
We are writing in support of the application SP2UOJ-00047 for expansion of the
Grace Works After schooI program from two days a week to foW days a week.
~ . .
We believe that the minimal impact felt in the neighborhood by the addition of several
cars and one van is offset by the potential benefits of providing meaningful enriching
activities to disadvantaged kids in Albemarle County.
Many of the kids in the GraceWorks program spend their after school hours unsupervised
and in front of the TV. We believe that there are long.,.terrn benefits to exposing kids to
the beauty of the county by providing a place ?Vhere they can safely explore the natural
environment and have the chance to participate in a host of activities common to other
kids like hikitig, fishing, swimming, p1aying basketball, painting, gardening,cookin~ etc.
We hope that you favorably consider this application.
...
~LJ ~/:J~i~
GL-r
U /tJ J t?' et.Je.... ')J, \ kJ..9
~ ~11 'rtt:.~-...) \ }(~... .J ^ "'2. "2. 'h::> )
Respectfully,
q2(J lh'-
E 1 (1e..r~
I g')l {J/)J ft,J<;lId It f).I
{jlMiAtM/ltll1-llI~ pt/ll
~ R. M.~
;lJI()\J~ eM .
('! ... \ ~~ ,0), z,z.1o I
.
~~~ OPwJ
CJ.N;.tJ.()Ibte s~ t \It'l. 2..- ~1 0 I
ffii 1lIvv. f7~ ?//L~J
77", Ll.li7: /"L YT7:t \
'"
J.
I
I q",-.trr.. :
1-.'. _ _::~~~~~~~/2~iff~;~~f!:~'-_=~_ .. ._'..--"=-=_..~~.'
I r 01" ,o/'cr("C
1-----.------ -----~ -- _d__ -/8. ~~ ;----(f;-7X;-,--n--.- ------- --- -- ---
I'--..~~~'~~~-'.-_.=-=-~~_~_~..._~_=-..._.&-;-;=-=-~_~~~ q~-'?L ~-.--==-~~~~...-.-...~=--~~-'=..-=----..
1__________.___________._0?k~ ~-.--~~.P~~-~n - -------- -'j"-'" '
! C;;yy.l( tdcrre'/j_ L~6<f/O /L'c
1_______.____________._____ -"- -----.------.--- _.'_n
I /\'brl- k'rvc, l"r
1-----.-----..--.--.-----.-'--.'-.----7---.-.----'----'" -----.-.-.. -.,.,
1- _-=.=~~~F~J~~~~~;~=--=~-~=-_.=- :.....
1___________________4 /n~_J: rp-4 ~d_______________.._____
I '
I
1..---.-.---..'---.--.-.---.--..-----.-------.-.-----.--. -- -- -------..- ---- - - - .-- -- __u______ --
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832
Fax (434) 972-4012
February 5, 2008
Stephen Waller, AICP
536 Pantops Center, PMB#320
Charlottesville, Va 22911
RE: SP2007-00050 Carters Mountain (ATC) - Verizon Tier III PWSF
Tax Map 91, Parcel 28
Dear Mr. Waller:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on January 15,2008, recommended approval
of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors.
Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All work shall be done in general accord with what is described in the applicant's request and site
construction plans, entitled "Carters Mountain Crown Orchard property, with a final zoning drawing
submittal date of 09/17/2007.
2. This condition #2 on SP 00 72 does not apply beca\:lSe of a change in the zoning ordinance section
related to personal 'Nire1ess service facilities. Additional antennae installation on this tower will
require a special use permit.
3. The facility will have only one outdoor light fixture (that complies with the County's lighting
requirements) attached to the proposed shelter to be used by Verizon's technical operations staff only
when night-time maintenance is necessary
The motion passed by a vote of 7 :0.
Motion for Modifications:
Modification of sections:
. Subsection 5.1. 40(C) (3): Modification of the flush-mounting req uirements in order to allow the
installation of a full sectored antenna array.
. Subsection 5.1.40rC) (3): Modification of the requirement to paint the antennas to match the
existing structure. This is because the tower's colors are not discern able from views that are off
the property.
. Subsection 5.1.40(c) (4&5) Verizon is requesting that the Board of Supervisors allow a
modification ofthe requirements for a tree conservation plan, as no additional land disturbance
is being proposed.
The motion passed by a vote of 7: O.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive
public comment at their meeting on February 13,2008.
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING
STAFF REPORT SUMMARY
Project Name: SP 07-050: Carters Mountain Staff: Gerald Gatobu
(ATC) -Verizon Tier III PWSF
Planning Commission Public Hearing: Board of Supervisors Hearing:
January 15, 2008 February 13, 2008
Owners: Crown Orchard Company Applicant: American Tower CorporationNerizon
Acreage: 234.165 (TMP 91-28) Rezone from: Not applicable
(Lease Area is part of this larger piece) Special Use Permit for: Sec. 10.2.2 (48) which
allows for Tier III personal wireless facilities in the
RA Zoning District
TMP: Tax Map 91, Parcel 28 By-right use: RA, Rural Areas; Property also has
Location: Carters Mountain Trail, 1 mile south of an existing Special Use Permit, last amended as
Thomas Jefferson Parkway [Route #53] at top of SP 00-072, for the co-location of an additional
mountain array of antennas on an existing tower.
Magisterial District: Scottsville Proffers/Conditions: Yes
Requested # of Dwelling Lots: N/ A DA- RA - Yes
Proposal: co-location of one new array consisting Compo Plan Designation: The Comprehensive
of six (6) new antennas at approximately 170 feet Plan designates this property as Rural Areas in
on an existing 270-foot tall guyed tower with Rural Area 4.
additional supporting ground equipment and
two (2) amendments to the conditions of SP 00-
072;
Character of Property: located on a tower farm Use of Surrounding Properties: Adjacent to
with several other tower structures of varied Carter's Mountain Orchard and several other
heights and sizes; Neighboring properties are all towers
wooded and residential.
Factors Favorable: see report Factors Unfavorable: see report
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval with conditions as presented in the Staff Report.
SP 93-15 RAM/BSE Communications - On July 14, 1993, the Board of Supervisors approved a special
use permit request to allow a multi-purpose tower not to exceed 300-feet in height. This facility is the
sub;ect of this request. The tower has been constructed.
SP 94-37 Centel Cellular - On March 13, 1995, the Board of Supervisors approved a speciaI use permit
request to allow a 200-foot cellular telephone tower.
SP 96-16 Stu-Comm, Inc. - On JuIy 10, 1996, the Board of Supervisors approved a special use permit
request to allow a I90-foot multi-purpose tower.
SP 00-88 Carter's Mountain Emergency Communication Facility - On April 18, 2001, the Board of
Supervisors approved a speciaI use permit request to allow a 250-foot tower as part of the regional
emergency communications system.
SP 00-72 Crown Orchard (NEXTEVCrown Castle) - On April 16, 2001, the Board of Supervisors
approved a special use permit request to allow the co-location of an additional array of antennas, on an
existing 270-foot tall guyed tower owned by American Tower Corporation, and a new 9'x16' equipment
building. This facility is the sub;ect of this request. The tower and equipment building have been
constructed.
SP 02-43 Crown Orchard (WVIR- TV) - On December 4, 2002, the Board of Supervisors approved a
special use permit request to allow the construction of a 250-foot tall lattice tower, 30 feet at its base and
5 feet at its top, for the attachment of an antenna supporting the Virginia Broadcasting Corporation's
federally mandated transition from analog to digital broadcasting.
SP 02-71 Crown Orchard Co,/ Pinnacle Carters Mountain - On March 19,2003, the Board of
Supervisors approved a speciaI use permit request to allow the co-location of two additional arrays
containing six (6) antennas an existing tower 205-foot tall tower.
SP 03-22 ECC Carters Mountain/Crown Orchard-Extension - On April 16, 2003, the Board of
Supervisors approved a request to amend an existing speciaI use permit by extending its period of
validity and allowing a minor increase in the size of an equipment building for a facility supporting the
regional emergency communications with a 250 foot high lattice tower, originally approved as SP 00-88.
SP 03-31 Albemarle County Fire Department Communication Amendment - On April 16, 2003, the
Board of Supervisors approved a request to amend an existing special use permit to allow the attachment
of an antenna, consisting oftwo 80-inch segments supporting communications for the County of
Albemarle's Fire-Rescue services, at 148 and 165 feet on an existing 205-foot tall tower.
SP 04-003 WHSV/Channe119 - Charlottesville - On June 2, 2004, the Board of Supervisors approved
a request to remove an existing 1 75-foot tower and allow replacement with a 1 49-foot tall tower. It also
allowed the expansion of an existing buiIding to accommodate transmittal equipment supporting the
establishment of a new local ABC television affiliate.
SP 05-014 Crown Orchard - Gray Television - On August 3, 2005, the Board of Supervisors
approved the request to amend the conditions of SP 04-003 in order to allow the placement of an
additional antenna on the tower.
SP 06-014 Crown Orchard - Gray Television - On March 14,2007, the AIbemarle County Board of
Supervisors took action on SP-2006-00041, Gray Television, to amend the conditions ofSP 2005-014 in
order to allow placement of one additional antenna on an existing tower and to allow greater flexibility
for future anticipated changes on Tax Map 91, Parcel 281 in the Scottsville Magisterial District
DISCUSSION:
This request is for a special use permit to allow for the co-location of one new array consisting of six (6)
new antennae at approximately 170 feet on an existing 270-foot tall guyed tower with additional
supporting ground equipment in accordance with section 10.2.2.48 of the zoning ordinance which allows
for Tier III personal wireIess faciIities in the Rural Areas [RA] Zoning District by Special Use Permit. A
special use permit was approved for the construction of the existing tower and equipment in
I993(SP 1993-15). The board of supervisors approved a second special use permit (SP2000-72) to allow
3
Will the public health. safety and 2:eneral welfare of the community be protected if the use is
approved?
The public health, safety, and general welfare ofthe community is protected through the special use
permit process, which assures that uses approved by special use permit are appropriate in the Iocation
requested. In this case, the proposed facility will give Verizon the ability to offer another choice of
personaI wireless service communication by providing a full range of voice and data services in
addition to the required E911 call services. This can be seen as contributing to the public health,
safety and welfare on a regional level.
Compliance with Section 5,1.40 of the Zonin2: Ordinance:
The county's specific design criteria for Tier III facilities as set forth in section 5,1.40 (e) are
addressed as follows,
Section 5.1.40 (e) Tier III facilities. Each Tier IIIfacility may be established upon approval of a
special use permit issued pursuant to section 31.2,4 of this chapter, initiated upon an application
satisfying the requirements of subsection 5,1.40(a) and section 31.2.4, and it shall be installed and
operated in compliance with all applicable provisions of this chapter and the following:
1. The facility shall comply with subsection 5,1.40(b) subsection 5,1.40(c)(2) through (9) and
subsection 5,1.40 (d)(2),(3),(6) and (7), unless modified by the board of supervisors during special use
permit review,
2. The facility shall comply with all conditions of approval of the special use permit,
Requirements of subsection 5.I.40(a) application for approval and section 31.2.4 special use permits
have been met. Compliance with Section 5.1.40(e) of the Zoning Ordinance: The County's specific
design criteria for Tier III facilities set forth in Section 5.1.40(e)(I) and 5.1.40(e)(2) are addressed as
follows: [Ordinance sections are in italics]
Subsection 5.1.40(b) (1-5): Exemptionfrom regulations otherwise applicable: Except as otherwise
exempted in this paragraph, each facility shall be subject to all applicable regulations in this chapter.
The proposed PWSF will be installed at site that already has an existing tower. Verizon's transmitting
equipment will be housed within an equipment shelter and will meet the required Rural Areas setbacks
in addition to all other area and bulk regulations and minimum yard requirements. Attached site
drawings, antennae and equipment specifications have been provided to demonstrate that personal
wireless service facilities (PWSF) regulations and any reIevant site pIan requirements set forth in
Section 32 of the zoning ordinance have been addressed.
Subsection 5. 1.40(c) (2): The facility shall be designed, constructed and maintained as follows: (i) guy
wires shall not be permitted; (ii) outdoor lighting for the facility shall be permitted only during
maintenance periods; regardless of the lumens emitted, each outdoor luminaire shall be fully shielded
as required by section 4.17 of this chapter; (iii) any equipment cabinet not located within the existing
structure shall be screened from all lot lines either by terrain, existing structures, existing vegetation, or
by added vegetation approved by the county's landscape planner; (iv) a whip antenna less than six (6)
inches in diameter may exceed the height of the existing structure; (v) a grounding rod, whose height
shall not exceed two (2) feet and whose width shall not exceed one (1) inch in diameter at the base and
tapering to a point, may be installed at the top of facility or the structure; and (vi) within one month
5
Neither site access nor installation of the facility will require the removal of any trees. All construction
will be kept completeIy within the fenced lease area.
Verizon is requesting that the Board of Supervisors allow a modification of the requirements for a
tree conservation plan, as no additional land disturbance is being proposed
Subsection 5. 1. 40(c)(5) The installation, operation and maintenance of the facility shall be conducted in
accordance with the tree conservation plan. Dead and dying trees identified by the arborist's report may
be removed if so noted on the tree conservation plan. If tree removal is later requested that was not
approved by the agent when the tree conservation plan was approved, the applicant shall submit an
amended plan. The agent may approve the amended plan if the proposed tree removal will not adversely
affect the visibility of the facility from any location off of the parcel. The agent may impose reasonable
conditions to assure that the purposes of this paragraph are achieved.
Neither site access nor installation of the facility will require the removal of any trees. All construction
will be kept completely within the A TC's lease area.
Verizon is requesting that the Board of Supervisors allow a modification of the requirements for a
tree conservation plan, as no additional land disturbance is being proposed
Subsection 5. 1.40(C) (6): Thefacility shall be disassembled and removedfrom the site within ninety (90)
days of the date its use for personal wireless service purposes is discontinued. If the agent determines at
any time that surety is required to guarantee that the facility will be removed as required, the agent may
require that the parcel owner or the owner of the facility submit a certified check, a bond with surety, or
a letter of credit, in an amount sufficient for, and conditioned upon, the removal of the facility. The type
and form of the surety guarantee shall be to the satisfaction of the agent and the county attorney. In
determining whether surety should be required, the agent shall consider the following: (i) the annual
report states that the tower or pole is no longer being usedfor personal wireless service facilities; (ii)
the annual report was not filed; (iii) there is a change in technology that makes it likely that tower or
pole will be unnecessary in the near future; (iv) the permittee fails to comply with applicable regulations
or conditions; (v) the permittee fails to timely remove another tower or pole within the county; and (vi)
whenever otherwise deemed necessary by the agent.
Should use of the antennae site in this location become discontinued at anytime in the future, Verizon
and/or its assignee(s) will be required to remove the facility within 90 days.
Subsection 5.1.40(c)(7): The owner of the facility shall submit a report to the agent by no earlier than
Mayor and no later than July 1 of each year. The report shall identifY each user of the existing
structure, and include a drawing, photograph or other illustration identifYing which equipment is owned
and/or operated by each personal wireless service provider. Multiple users on a single tower or other
mounting structure may submit a single report, provided that the report includes a statement signed by a
representative from each user acquiescing in the report.
After the proposed PWSF has been installed, Verizon will cooperate with the American Tower
Corporation to ensure that the required annual report accurately accounts for all equipment that Verizon
maintains at the site.
7
antennas, supporting brackets, and all other equipment attached to the monopole shall be a color that
closely matches that of the monopole. The ground equipment, the ground equipment cabinet, and the
concrete pad shall also be a color that closely matches that of the monopole, provided that the ground
equipment and the concrete pad need not be of such a color if they are enclosed within or behind an
approved structure, fafade or fencing that: (i) is a color that closely matches that of the monopole; (ii)
is consistent with the character of the area; and (iii) makes the ground equipment and concrete pad
invisible at any time of year from any other parcel or a public or private street.
As demonstrated by ground equipment and antennas at the existing tower sites on Carters Mountain,
visibility of the Verizon antennas and the equipment sheIter will not increase the visual impacts of the
existing tower farm on Carters Mountain.
Section 5.1.40(e)2: Thefacility shall comply with all conditions of approval of the special use permit.
The facility compIies with all conditions of approvaI of the speciaI use permit (Section 32.2.4):
Section 704(a)(7)(b)(I)(I1) of The Telecommunications Act of 1996:
This application is subject to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which provides in part that the
regulation of the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities by any
State or local government or instrumentality thereof (I) shall not unreasonably discriminate among
providers of functionally equivalent services; (II) shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the
provision of personal wireless services. 47 Us.e.
In order to operate this facility, the applicant is required to comply with the FCC guidelines for radio
frequency emissions that are intended to protect the public health and safety. Neither the Comprehensive
Plan nor the Zoning Ordinance prohibits the provision of personal wireless services. However, both do
implement specific policies and reguIations for the sighting and design of wireless facilities. In its
current state, the existing facilities and their mounting structure all offer adequate support for providing
personal wireless communication services. The applicant has not provided any additional information
regarding the availability, or absence of alternative sites that could serve the same areas that would be
covered with the proposed antenna additions at this site. Therefore, staff does not believe that the special
use permitting process nor the deniaI of this application would have the effect of prohibiting or
restricting the provision of personal wireless services.
SUMMARY OF STAFF REVIEW OF SP 07-050:
Factors favorable:
Staff has identified the following favorabIe factors:
1. The co-Iocation of antennae and equipment subject to this speciaI use permit would not restrict any of
the uses that are permitted by right or impose any additionaI impacts on adjacent properties.
2. No clearing or other disturbance is necessary for the placement ofthe antennas and equipment.
3. This proposal represents a co-Iocation opportunity for antennae that are anticipated to have minimal
visuaI impact.
9
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Site PIan
B. Arial Map
C. SP 93-15 BOS Action Letter
D. SP 00-72 BOS Action Letter
E. Photographs of Existing Tower
11
/'
IX: ~~ ~~fl; ~ ~
tI ~ ~ ~
@~ ~ ~ ~
N Z ";iJ-;;;'
..9! >-N z~ a <
e lYN ffi~ I::i:i
::>'"
ON ~ ~~~I Inl .....
Oi 0<( LU =
)-> ~ ~
, o. ~z e
<(0 ~6~ ::10 ~ I
lYz ..c:l
0 tJ
-::.
"'I 8~ ~
~~ ~~ ~IUU l~~ I .....
I lY 2 <
~ l:} ! !
CI)
CI)
~
~
.~
c:'"
.1
ti
:5
~
o ....1-
zo~<
~I-I-~
!<~f~
Sw.l~~
.jj!:oF-o:
< ~!Z ~z
....:>OJ!::ii:
?$:I:~ ~
2 ~ a: Os
o.l~:f:::li
I- '" II>
~~~~~
~a.~:>D
8~~!<~
8~iffi~
~i~~i
~~~..;~
I-",!:!:::l
~~~~~
~'Q.oa..
.... u....
.c ~ Q~o
....a?~~9!
ii=I-~~
o~~~~
:f~!!!9~
t;;ylg:
~;~~!;(
1;;%-. ...
u'e::a:
~~-;t~
,:.:~!<~~~
i'BS~CIl~g
u 0..... UJ
~9EIi2l:~<
... ii:g a? t5 15""
;;;>-~~...i
ClOg ..._
-ii:m' ~...;
w llit::'?
~~ II> T ~~
~
Cl
~
~ ~ I I I I
z
-
~~ ~
LU 0
Z 2:::!8 6@
:) ~~~ ~~
O ~Z~ "LUO
~<>oa..U)1-
L~W~O~~
,OZ:::J trlOOL
L UO::>s; oZZ9::
o ffl~<(<(::>
(/) ~~~ ~5~8
~ uLU2 ~2
u.. a:: t-: <( <f' LU
W OiX:I ::31-
L zlSu ~~
r~ ~
((a::
U
~
!g
'"
z
o
;:::
C>.
02
U
II>
....
Cl
~~8
o ........~
::>I....::J
:.!;~12e:s
~~81 g~
~~ 1-3
N~!
o
z
a:;
0:
~
.... ....
.... 0 0
.. '- '-
i!l S g
o 0
~ I ~ I ~ I I
~
~
II>
<.:>
z
~ II>
Cl <.:>
c.!l z
~ ~
o Cl
N
<.:>
% & z
o < Z
;::: z 0
a.. :i N
5 a ~
~ 0:: Z
.. C a... ~
I
i
i
~
i3
z
"
is
~
'"
i :41
z
o
B
~
8
z
o
E
~
'"
>i
--z
~~
~ ~ i~
Z ;::: ?l ~ Uo
t; ~ ~ C>. ~ ~5 ~
l:f::l 85 l:!:! l:!:! C>. :::Ii!;!; 0
:1:. ~iiiiii!:!~~~~ ~
CJ) 113 i i i ~ old old ~ ~ ....
~e bl~~~~e
~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
;::: ~ l;l II> is <.:> we dUll>
~_ N - ~ N ", ~ -. ~ -
~~ ~ 6 6 ~ 6 ~ 6 ~ ~
i
:::Ii -.
18 ~
Q N P.'i
~ ~ . J:
~ ~ ~:m I;~
1: ~~~ I i~
a
~ ~~
Q ~,c
Ii: . ZZ>'
0.. ! ~~~
lQlQq
- ~~-
~~~
", co
~OO>
:::>ina
0: 1 I
uo-
-~
Iii
5e_
~
~ ~ i
wi~~I@. ~
~!f;l~u~~~
z
z~ 0 .
t,:8 ~g!
.....- ~I
III ~ %
Ii CD'" !.~
"'ls~ ~r
; ~ ~ ~ ~~
I-U
~~
.. !~
i !I~
~ ::>~
wi~ C>. s~
191 ~~
N I-
~...~ ~
... B~ ; ~
u~.. 5 ~ ~
- !~~,:.: wi ~I;~~~i~i
I~~sl: C>.li~ i~88~ii
It
~
f5:N
~,..,~
a.:7c.r
n::R:R
I-NN
~o;;-o;;-
= ~gg
1
!:!
::>
II>
W
~~
~~o;
w ....
zLl.l;::~
~~sJ~C5
zo25u~!
~5!~aC>.
u~~lf~~
-'0
..............
....'OtlXl
:f<j'cr
~NN
ci~~
w~
~I
....
ilf
~;
t:~
i~
CD
ffiflj
i~
w
a..
.~~
I'?I
m~~
I!l~~
~........
ffi~~
~
N
1
!:!
:::l
en
~~
St::..t:;,
u
cLci
.~
l!?m~
~9~
~""N
=>G:
~~~ w~!
~ .i:l,:.:~~
~~~m~if~ w
~~~58~~ ~
f5
- ~N ~ I
- w~ . ~ ,:.:
:::l~ z ~
~~~ wffi a.. i. ~ w
;~il~1 dl~~~ g~~
UCDZU~~ ~i~~~ ~~~
--z
~
S
i
~
~
Z
o
5
wdsr:z, lOOZ/SZ/90 6MP"-1\lO-9Z-' iIOllJ - oz\r\SS>Z\rd\:H
~
)>
CD
CD
;:u
rTJ
<
j;
::j
o
z
(/)
R-
tf)
~
~
CD
o
r
tf)
C
(/)
-t
@0EJ 8>
c
~
,....
~
~
1"'1
.
~~ ~ ;
","'" '" 0
~ ~ z
(')
...
~
(')
1"'1
~~~I~~~~~6~~~~Zoi~i5~~~~g~~~8~SE~~~8~~88~P~"'~i~~~~~gg~888~gg@(')8g~~~~~~~~~~2~~
~n ~ 2 ~ 0 n ~ ~a < ~ 0 ~ ~ S n~ ~. ~ ~ -~~~ ~~ 5~ ~~ n
N S ~, ~ ~~ 0 . ~ 0 N
Cl ~ i;J '< ~ ~ x ,"0
o ,- .." PiP'
!6
~~~II!~II~li~I~I;mg~~i~ill~!;~~~~~~ai~j~~~~~~I~jlll~mlii~i~~~~~m!~6!~llj~~~~~
~~~~~~ ~~ $a~g ~~ ~~~;~(')~ c~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~'" ~og~~ ~;:S:~ ~1"'1~~!~i!~p
50 ~ z ~ ~ r~~8 ~ ~ g~ ~ "'~o ~~ i~ ~xP ~ z~
c~ '" F % ma~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Z 1"'1> ~~ ~~~~ z~
'" ~ ~;;!;~ ~ E ~ '" "'~ $6 Ii?~,....r- ~o
~ ~~~ (') (') rn ~ ~ 00 5a ~~ ~
~ ~ ~ c! 1:1 ~ ..."',.... ~
c iT1 S; mz- (') ~ '_
;e: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ %
o '"
~ 0 ~ m
~ ; ~ ~
z > ~
~ ~ ~
c
-Or"'PRojl.-
X:E:E:E:E:E:E~S~CC~O%~%%~~~~~~~~~~~~"''''~~~~~~''O''O''O~~33~000002g0~~;;!;~ZZ
~~ a ~, ~~~~~nz ~~~~~~o~~~x~ ~an6~ ~-~~~~~~ N~~~~Z nn~n ~
c ~ ~ 0 co~~ n d~ ~~ a ~ ,~- ~
-t -of ~
"0
~cV
"'Ill
"'0
;:::!~
~o
ZZ
(')
'"
",'"
~~
~g
~z
...
z ~ "0 ~ ~ ~
C ~
~ c ~
m ~ '"
c:
2 z
...
~
"0
~
j~~~mi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~g8Ia~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~SSS~~
a~ g ~ ~~~~~~~a~5~~c! ~~~$~g2%~ ~~~g~~~~a 8 ~g ~~ffiffi~~~~~oz~~~
~~ ~z ~o (') %c~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cgz~~ii~ 0 ~ 6~~ c~~~8~
~8 ffl ~~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~...'" 6 ~~; ~"'~~~~
~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ "O~o~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~
V) ;TI Cr'TIQ:z:: ~ ::z:::U ::0 0 ~
'" ~c ~ ~ ~ .
~ 0 ~ 1"'1~ ~
8 8 ~:;l
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
"0 Z
~ ~
o
~,.tP!'.'
.'Sf'
:z:--
DIll"'''
~:z:--
{ ~ ...... I I
~ " ~ i
I to
0 ~ ,;
......~.s /~ C!: 0 I
..,
I I
\
"- -
r I ! I~ 2 D I 0
rTJ ~
C> ~/ ~
rTJ I
z
0 .......'y
;l ;l ~ ~ g,J l7i ~ 0 ~ ~ ::l "0 lD ~ r- ~ 'tl (')
~ "0 ~ ~ C ~ ~ '" a
'" ... "0 s: ~ I; ~ a z
... ... ~ (') ~ '" ~ "0 (')
c:: ... 0 % "0 ... 1"'1 ~
Z ~ '" ii ~ % ~ Z '" ?o S!
... ~ 0 ~ z
:z: ~ ~
~ ~ 1 ~ c:
... ... ~ :z: c:
m ~ ~ ~ ... z
~ 0 a; ...
0 z ia Sl
% '"
;0:: n ~ z
?o ..::t
"" (')
"0
...
c
Gl
~
I I :/ UUH n G) ~ I
~ i !ij I ~8 g~~ ;u
-I ; II ~ !~;~ 00; l-
Ie."
o~ ;;::~
a
I ~~rn Z;u
a z~ 0)>
so~ --0 .0
I'J ~~ ;;J>- <-< ~,
~ -< :Po
M ",0
Z C ~z ~~ 0 = e."C fti
V') Z "';u iir
.. .. ~ ~~ ",-i
" " ~ !li~ '"
- ... tl
~ .. ;0
e~
~:E:Z:
~~~
~~~
~~i
II
Z
o
i!
~
'"
~
~~ ~ ~ ~
a:: ~fli ~ ~~
:: ~ ~
~~ "- "-
'" Z .. ..
J!! 1-'" z~ a
",,,, ~~
m ::>1') ~o3 -
.~ 0'" ~ ~~~i } I
o<{ I
>-> ~z i i
o . a:::~CL. U
, <0 i~~ ::Jo ::> ~
"'2 ~ !1
0
~::> 8~ 2 i!i V) V)
"':r
~<;;! I~ ~ luh ::i N r i
'" i! ~
I Ii <..7 ~ i i
x .... ~
0 ..... ..... u ....
!?~ :::> ~
Z ~~ Z ~ 0 a: OW
e D::
z~ .... I- 0 ~ :::> ~~(Il
D:: c:i Z iE V'l l8 . 0
......0 D:: ~ ... >- - .....
0 xD:: 0 ~~ ~. -' ~ c:i ....b~ffi~z
ig~~ UO Irl :::> a: 13;;'" ~ 15
r5~ x'" V'l 0 '"
V'l~ Z Z ...
D:: 0 G:LI..~I= 20
::;)<.:)0 . V'l..... ~ ........ ~... u Qo !!! ~o;;~;;:i~
V'lD::~~ UlXl ;::;. U ,...:
!'/~V'l~ ~o V'l ~o ;.:/:!! ~ 13~ i Z ~i!5j:...~triV'l 15
;:::~ i!5 :::>z 15 ........ ~ ;:::/:!!. ....2 2
::I:W~....J ....
Q. "" :s:::> <g V'l ~~ V'l <~ ltjg~~~~~:5
;::: ~::1 :::> rg
~~Q.V'l U ~ !i)0 V'l ~ m....Ja~::~z~
8~2~ .....u ~ gj: 2~
O~ ~~ V'l ~
~o~~ ..... V'l ~ lt21 .u ~ ;; "" ~~5i~~~;:;~
15!>! D:: ~It :::>0 ~i5!!! 2f3~0
-' 0 ~ ~ :::>
< .0iS Zo 0 ... -' ~~ ... f3~ 2l /:!! i ~ l:l lii';; ......
2U~V'l ll:l~ ~ ;;j: ~ c:i Z 0 ~
~a:~~ ~~ ~:'; ~ a: 13 ;II: ~ ~0i7i:::> ...~Z N ....
:;~ ~ ~ u UZD::;:::/:!! u
5 ~ I ~
.0 '" ~...f35i;:;~~..... u ~
z~u~ 515 . 15 o~ i:(!; ... ll!~ V'l lXl
Q. :::> :l5!!!~......~ !3 ~
... ... ~ "'0 U ~~ d ~ x < ~ ~~
~~D::f3 o~~ a:g: 0 ~ ;II:
.....:::>~2 ~~~ ...'" 0 < Ii?~ D:: z~~~~ .z~~ ili '"
!fl~ D:: !!!~ ~~ Z ltj ;::: ll! Q......ltg~02z ~ ~ b ~~~f3 z5 ... .
;l:0~l? 0~1i? ~ 0 V'lz ::> ....uD::~i~i=.... ! :!?;~ ... ;;a ;;~
~~ -,'" ~ V'l0 lXl "" ;;a:~ ~~21;; ~ ;;..c.....~
z~~!i! ... Q. ll:l; ;;~ ~ i '" .... j:i5~~~ j:ii:
0<:5 ?ii..... g ~..... . ... ~~::::: :;a~g :J"- ~ i Si iO/Q
Q. Irl ;::: ~ ... ~!i
iiSo~ g~ ~ D:::::l x @ o. gl~ !!!g~ !~ .
!E;II:~ ..... :i~i l?~ U u ~<;;~~ 0 "'~~ V'l !Ii
~ ~~~i Irl ~ 15 15 "'"""'0::: ~w G "'101= 8 u guQ. ~~i5 t; 0;1:
0V'l ~ ~L<l 0 lXl ~5wo::&,-" ~ ~
~ili... ~ ~5 ... ...u ~ !!!~~~~:;a...~ . ""~ u 't! -'gl!Z o~ -'~~ ~I:i
li1f5 ~ ~ ~ N
~~g:::> .....;; Q.~ ~ :::>z ~ ;;8:;~0!!?;;l:;; ~ ~.. u ~ Oi~9~ ~gli5 !>!
z :Eo:::S:VJ iO..... !!! ....zD:: ~~ D:: ~~ 0 '" .... 15 Z ""u
Z 0 ; ~ Z>-~.....~~ .0 ClOWO<<J ;::: z2 8i5~ !!!g~
~ ~~~i Zu ~ 2~Cl :::> ~lj ~"'OEClO l:J !!! i5 V'l0
:::> ilt ~~ ~ ~~ 2 O<:zzz f.l)w ~ ('j ~ff} I ui= -~
og~ /:!! ~15!>!222~~ ~-i=u V'l Z ~0~8<~ /:!!~~
8l?;;"z V'l .... ~ :::> o~ Q.Z _~I=Z~ ~!!!
808 2 V'l -... ... V'lltii:ii:i=Oo 8GB i7i ~
2;D:: 0:::> ~c~ Ii? !!!2 au D::z ~~ ~ ~D::~~21~~ ('j :sg 0 (I)~"'" I
:::) I'-le ;;:;':5 ;; ~ ~ lt~lt ;;8 ....0 ~ ~g~i;8 V'l~'" V'l""
Q. za: 2N Z
en ;;~21 ;;~
c:i ...:
...: N ...; ..; or; <D ,.: ad en
_________~;--~ Vl::~ mH~)]S -_~NIl H-'>!VL__________~"\---
~ ' ,
\ ----------~\
"\/,,0
I
,
I
I
,
,
I
I
,
,
I
,
,
I
I
,
\
I
I
\
~- \..G #1:"
~ -- 'Io,.~c" \o~~O\
~ v:G I\'~~
-- ~~~,'l.'btoo~~t _
~ ~ ,~.,~,,~Q.. -
~-- "\~ 1.0 /" -.
,-~ ,/ I Alol.l~ O"/~O_ Sl ,,~_
~ ' I OAlf1o ~.pg-90~" ?l!loz -___...
,~ ~ / "' ~tN,~t;~~~,~~ --__
-- JO 80 .\'If. __
/ .J...J.,S~:],
" "1'Alf1
I
~
,~'
~'
//
o
"
o
2 0
o 0
~ g
tr""
0"'0
a.~~
8~g~ct
~a::a::
~2~~o
~:;;\Z!
u...~~2
2 ~
< ::l;
::i
fi: ~
<
:r
~l'c
~ C-9ID
~O'
MAG
,~'
,~
,~
/'
""....
~
~
--
,~'
~'
~
ill
...
c
ill 8
...'"
U II
I I
b6
-' -'
Q.Q.
, ,
co "
"'-
xx
, ,
...-
...-
D::D::
f2e
>-
~ 0
a. &l
~~~
u:Jig
O=ft::1 VJ
~~gl::!~
~~~..
Ck:~-~S
o~...t5
zm"""N
;:OQ..N
o ~
5 ~
l-'
2
o
~
2 0
::> S!
o '"
"-",0
<(~6
z~
-ooVJ
~~95~
>Z~<o
u..Nm~~
0~2
~oa.
in ~
eJ x
~ :!
z
::>
,
,
\
,
,
\
y//\"
, ~ \
,./' ~....,,~~o\#,
, ",\S\,u ~ '
~~~~* ~
.09 \;>.l>~Q"
"\~ 'Y" 1.Ci'- __
~
co
co
o
'"
".
u-
<N
~t5
ZF=
<<
21D>
"'::>~
F:Z:w
\
\
:z
:5
a..
.....
.....
Vi
o
:z
~
>-
.....
>
a::::
::;)
en
./
en ------
c:
~
1""1
-<
>
%
o
en
=i
1""1
"
!j;
%
--------
MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET C-l
- :--:::::--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
\
,
,
\
,
,
\
:E
o
o
o
;;! :E
x l>
;0
:l:: 0
?o f:f
-1>0"", V>
~~~':~
~~~~~
9)>'i'-;'~
(")0"
$?~'i''''''<-
Uloit;o
'i''''c
o ....,
S fT1
i; fT1
V>
g
fT1
,
,
\
-1
:r:
o
.... s:
~ ol>
oV>
~OZ<-
"tl1Il~q
N~~~~M
~!l'~-I>ol>;o
f'T1O)o~~(J)
0)>0'-00
"(") I "tlZZ
;0;00"
)>Gl'i'"",ov>
oa>UiO
O.....-1r
111I;o
S oF:>
<0 -1
o :E
o ~
fT1
;0
- ------
------ -
------ - -
~.?V'1t
.Or
.60
00-0 ~
~b-"'-...
'tJ' ,
~
~c....
vlll,-
ts~....'"
~...,J~;O
~g.t~
~I.,,!:i
",8"-<
rnb~F
'T ~n
c
....
o
c
.. ------
& -------
- -----
----- -
'\-
I
I
\
I
I
\
,
,
\
,
I
\
I
I
\
,
,
\
,
,
\
I
I
\
,
I
\
'~
~
~ Z
I ?Ii
\ ... ....
\ l< ~
~ Z
-o~:;!
N"'i'i-:l::
\ o~<<o""'r=
\ ~~g~-<
!'?~b;g8
~el'i'-;g
ge;:o
\ I C"f)>
\ q
\
I
B z
a
~~ d~
d~
_N I==z
~"". i!
xx
;l>t
65 i!li.....
........ ~:
I I
, . .~
II II ~
"'N
&~ gj
.....
c c
::l
c:
:;!
~
..... ..,
I:
~ ~
&
);!
x
~c....
1Il,-
N~~=- ."
o ~ -..J ~:L;o
~~g~~
!? I ':1J!:i
~~8"-<
el' -r
8:.;Jr
,"'(")
c
~
c
c
\
\
I
\
\
\
\
I
I
\
\
I
\
I
\
\
; ; -0 PUI~ i~ G) ~ ;0 I
n~ I N~ ~!. ~ ~~ 2~~
~ (n 1I1~ i~;~ n. i
z'"
I <::~
,,~~ o~ 0
Z;o
0 ~~ 0)>
- ~o - 0
)> ~ gw i j;;-< ~
() -,
c ~ ~~ ",0 (jI
"'c
co co i'i~~ ~~ Z ~ ~ (D"
~ ~ 51 '" Ch
... co iiI :;;0 (Ii
~~
... ...
,Ii
C:I,)~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
a::: tili S ~ 0
tI S ;:::.
~ ~3 ~
J!! N r-- \'-. ~ Z
t-N "<t- Z~ B
e <>:N 0 ~~
=>'" ~ \Y l:) ('V)
ON ~ ~ ~~~i ~
"i U<( ~ ~~
>-> !Ill I
0.
I <(0 ..... U
crZ 0 ~2 i6~ ...;JO
0
-~ z 8~ l:)
"':1: ~
~~ I i
<>: ~~ ~~ ~nlli
I .. i i
((~O ~ C)
~ ~ ~
::; 5 :::E
i= i= C
::> ~ ~ ;i! ~
0 ~~
~,..: I>:
"- U
-z 0 !;c =>-
~'" l::l :r~
:2 ~ I!: "- ~
b'" V> W :::En
N~ ~ V> 8~
I :::E
VI U CI u 0 ~~
VI VI t;; :z e e: .... z
~~ ~ i z....
"'cr '" :t: .... ~~ i'!' ~
en 9;" w~ !!l I ~....: i:
l5 z
~'" ~..: r:;: ~~ ~~ c
..... ~ ~
ZVl .... r:;: i:~
:z OVl '" ; ~
N'" "--J ~ I ~I>: !~
:z -cr d~ V> i=~ .....::i
0 0::" Z I-~
~~ o t 0 ~~ .
fl Vlo (.) ~ :z ~ ..011>: ~~
~o ~11l :z~e:x ~ ....!;i'Z !!l~ !!l~
:;:) ~~ " .... i~i
~ ZVl o X :z I>: ~I
_ X ~ :~
:z B B ~ ~ ;i! ~8
0 ~~
(.) W " -: N ...; i'!'u
--
.................
...................-
--
--', "'" "'" --"""" 'v"""
-"""'--/
o
....--........
,
,
-............
....--...................... "",""".......
,/-\1>,\6/'
- --///-// / ~'
- - /// ,...",1;
_ __/-//-/ ?; SOl ,/- /
_ ~ ~ ~\A \<0-.... ,,/
------ .........._~J;r... ",''
/ ~~ ,
...................... ~~ """"
/ ~es /
,// "l Vj //-/
................... ;............
/'
..............--...................
///------'---/-///
---
....-----
__------11>,14----
------------
---
.........---
............--
............
.........-------............
-----
------
----------
'in
,,'...-......---
,
\
\
\
..
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
,"......J
:
!
I
I
,
I
,
,
I
I
,
/'-"'""""
.............................--.................. "..
",
..., .....,
""". '...
, ...........--- -
"""""'\
:
-------
.'0
"'-
II II
............-
o
,
......---'
",'1,'0'"
,\
\ ....-...
...---...
,
,
\
\
I
-->--"\
: \
I \
----1\ \
: \ \
'\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ )
\,./
------...-
\
\
\\...
"
.............
"-
"
"
"
.. ~~
..... ........................ )<)0(
, ,
--
"'................
...."",'"
/
."..........
......"''''
."..."'....
"'......;.......
...........
----....-..........
I I
I- I-
~~
I
I
:
,
'.......-- - ------------
",
................
-,
-..................
---
'-,
"
"-
, ,
...-
N-
ee
-------------......
""""'"
..................
",
~
s.,'"
~H5
~~~
-----/////
...-----
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.JJj
_--- I
- ..J
--f-
J
~
\;j~
:s:""
~:s:
<5~
\J",y,
"'~
\Q'-5
[;S~
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
~
-.........-.
---
--- - -- ::::..:=:- -
--~ -- ---
........----
--
---
--
"
"
"
....................
"
......,
.....----
/'
..............
....-......
ax'
~ --
---------___ ______1430---
_--- __------ ___ ---- -- - - ---- - - - - - -40'--- - _ _ _ ____ _ ________
z
:s
Q..
C>
Z
C
------ ~
C>
,..,
z
>:
::0
C')
,..,
o
(I)
=i
,..,
"'V
>:
z
.""~ -,
',,-,~," ~
_-,:rT""5/"'\J~,.. ~ /
"1',-,(""7':,:-;'( ,I.", )('~C:(::)r\ )~--r:;~.... -........... /
_~-t;r).' "'I l....'\') (" 'I \)(~;'r 'I; )\):"'~"""""" ...............
_~i'''''''''J;_'''' ';"---::;r',," '......../~~ "/'....' '':....'-':'" ,~/ '''..:'- -,,~....;- .....1"-::- J;....' 7'*0 ............... //
__-)'~ ...J 'I '(__ ..---', i/ 'Ie ..).. l( )' ./ I( J', ~ )( 11...._">,..., ./ ./
-~-5:)':'~:_~:- -,,'( I:.....~'_:t -<~(j~J~'....t ): )(:~'-:'t )( )~:'"z .-<~( 1-:::' l ""',C)>~~~ /" //
7"""'v)1) 'f.r'YJ()\ ,";-,(',,"I)',,)r(\':;(\\ ),,(\,;\)\ ~I"^\-/[} '('I'~'?\'\--'I,(-'n\\-'c""'''' /
-- 1("""-(")\~;;r" \ '\F,f-,"( \\J,2:;/) , <)[~,,~ ,'((-'U-~,f', ('"FV< (')' jl:;"" \")\t"r-) 'c ),k:'~~ //
-- _ .-,:"'l"(-:r:;:,/~::[\(!(,:\,:,( \1r')r!)(,) -:./( ~'?)l:~rr,/( ~:';(1,'~\!( \(,\'~ll;"!l.)';!r' ::"()I~,r;; .....// ~\');,'-:l,'~~~"" 1,1 \()( "j<C) ,r, '\t\,'["(i,! ,:i;?t))~)(:r,,(, ~~>, '"" .-",,-/
__ - rr),)'"" ",,),) 1\", )\ j !'," ",) '" 'l "_/" )'" lc '''~'I'''r', '(\1'" r
'-__ ~__ <Jr-,':.:--..-,::::- :... '~r <...."';:'~':.. if ';::--, ~'J>" --..".J( '0-. )':.......-'~,r ') ( '':: /:"",j./ "( '~'-:-'::;;(;'---<11 '~(~\:~--~f ~"~" ,;:--- -.... (-,~ 'r~~:/ ""1 ( '-">',........? .... I. I ....,l ~\)l; ('-""1' )\)(:';'">""
~ __-,r)l, .......r ./)l ,.....It 1/;( ....1 '( J( ....).. 1/ Jl_.......C ( ), -\ ,I), /_' ! !',__<l ,( ):_-----1, )f ,'.-'_/, ()~ f~""'-'::-':'" ....I"::>J,.:..':.~--..f
, JI','-'" "....l,.~:__~-'I ......,1, I, -)(''-,.1. I," -.....,' ']...J. ':,. ....i'--Y-.....J....,:' -'( )......./..-7 '( )....' ,,"" 'II" )"; ,I, ',( l....l- ':' '( ,.... ....-:' )( i..../' " '- j')I)f. ....)1 )1 1_
~ _~r-~~)r ;j:.A,; !(\( Ji--,?'<'o1'\<" )~/'\~....f(\\ ))-: ,~~\~,;/\(_:),\~~~o(y;-~~, :<;,-~(y- I';'jt<'~()'- )~,(\;/C,>\ ~~"'\{'\'-,:l\\ .-:r' (\/:Je)\ \'lr:\~:J(\~ j( ;;: ,-1....,,[ :',( tJ...........
- - '-t(" ~ -:~J.i\i~ ~;Q~ )~~ >)F )l~~~f;:.\);;~t?; ;D(J(~ r1~\:,y~~:(~j~~~Y~~?;i')()~\ ,,~~:O\)\( ~ (::y,;\ )(\t~,~i~',Y({\~1i~',~)111?()~i~:(';~{)~j/~ ~ }j';v-
<7~ ~)??\)h,?' :."'/ \.. :~~;,----'':''; '":..; )"':.~''- ~..:. ( ~>....,.-~~J;'''-~! ~..)" /-- .<; -"::--;'::--:'~ ....~I ..>/\:~J'~/r '";;- ""J;'-- "1/ N :~~..::. / ''..' :~':> '~/- ,'::.,-..;-\,:'-;;"/~_~ ~(\(, r' ;"( ''if ).V
-....:.~.~.../') \ \~ )1 J' Jl II' .-' '/)' )! /1..,..J I", )1), J' /l / ,l /, " L j( I, /"__- .....'-::<( ....,1>-
--":"'~:"",I/",:}, ..../! 5~I:~-"_,<' ;:(-;,:-~":-: )(/~,/"J~' .)(J;~/" t ~~: I~~/ t _~~(;:~~\..? )(},~(- ( 4l{rJ:;'_".:i~--'; .....>/'.....
~....../\_/<( ..'::.-,-~~\(.;:,,(>\....,!,,/:\---\\\,/,;"/:)'~.)\f .)(IC,/---,)\ '(~("Y,.-'\); "(\(.')(,,,)\) '("(\.- \t- -..~- - ---
-....... ,( ~l,- ~' I \\/(1/ ~.J( '\jr"'~/ 'I \ \\..1(31 ';\1. \ '(~I ),~\ \'-/.~( )r..( \,/:..~- _--
-', I .'- d - I~' / ~...._//,.. 11'1'.....,1)\ I( -..1_, I I. I( ,VF" .J,.... - ____
-<--d..(F(-', ~,( \'c\(',";-'[ ',r'<','-,' \i'-"!-, ~;.J V. \
--f~~~tl::-\>I\--r~~.../,I:..::.~~,..... ) ...../;'...: I." }t.....,~'--;,j_-- ____ -"
--~~/.(j~,.~'~ - ----
-...~~--
--~
-- -- ---------
--
/
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
"'i\
R~
~~
\J~~
Aj\!
"'~
/
/
/
/
~
~
~
"'Gt'1
Rt)j
[;j~
\J;~
",j\!
~
--
-'"
'i~
/"\
< \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \ ~~
\ \ ~ iJj
\ \ ~>::l
\ \ ~
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \,---
\
\
\---
~~
~t)j
~~
~<')
~~~
"'~\;j
~~
i:3
'6
xx
~~
-'"
~-IIl;.
~~
'tiiJj
~;'::j
~~
~~
<::5;;
"''''
r- r-
S~
I I
II "
-'"
"1.-
C>
"l
"1.
~
G 0 :'" !" !J' !" !" !" :- en
en BEl BBB B B 0
~ z ~F >2i! ::0::0'" ~~ i! n"'~ ~TS!if;g ~
", "''''''' 00 ",
.:; z z ~~ ~ z z ",z en -'" 0"'''' '" z3 gJ8Z~C5
~~Ei$li5 ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ r:l~ -I i~ ~S s;gn ~~ '" ij~~ z i)AJ;:O Z
;0 ::Ozo 0 C'lJ,c:~0
2nll:~iT1 rI; rI; ~~ rI; rI; rI; 0_ C'lz ~!!!Z ~o~
!i5ji .. g C) ~~ c: ~"" ij~ g~ n 3~g g n 0
::0 ill ::0 ::0 ::0 "'CD~ "" i5~~
z::oO Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~x 0 "'''' z- "0 -I
R ;..,r.. Hi ~ r-~ ~ iilt:n ~iT1 E 3'!"Z~~ ",
0 -I -I ~o . :<0 Z::o,.
% % % !'-'% Z -'" C'l0 z !:l~ic:ij en
-'" Z - C> (5 r- 2::0 0::0 $!~ C'l 3Ei~
~~~ ~ ~ !S ",!S aE aE aE "'~ "'- . ::I c:
C) ::0 ~i$l ~ ~ ;;; Z ~ 1!lu; ...'" ~~ 0 o>~ ~i!ii~~
~ m ~::o '"
~E !g !:l ~Hi ~N il; ::0 ~i$l >2 2!l}g
3E!:l 0
x c: a '" '" ,.0 Z 8 s'" S~ n 65l~ 8n ~
I~i 0'"
?w~ 1% 0 c:~ z;!l '" 8~~ oz~~
!lA '" I "":. :-!S c: rI;::o ~
I "1. .... -I 2! F~ ~tii ::0 CD ~~CD
..... x PI a; . '" I "'3E1 ~~i~~
"'l ~ ~ ", ~ ~~ of;; 0
i:i "":. ~ en I!i~ !Olo
8 "'2:j C", zO o~
~ ~ 1<'~ C'l'" ::0
g~~ S m ~ .., a Z ~::o ~8 28r- neno "TJ
~ n ~I: ~i:o o~z~o
~ ~ !C il; "'''' ::oZ 0 '<~~
~ ;;;~ ~ij z tii i! ~::o
~l;:C !" "0 n ~~ ...n
3E lI: 0 '" il !:l~'"
~ ~ ::0 S2 '" on!:l
::0 n~ ~?j ~
::og ~ 0 ~ a ... ~ ~3E 0 g~",~~
Neg 00 ...::1 "'z'"
Silc: Z V> 0 !!S tiiil~
0 n Zc: ",0 ",z ~1!l~"'l;
il '" :!J... F
z;;;o '" "0 '" '" ~s: '" ~l2
0 ~~ '" V>
C'l"'::O 91 ~ ~ !!S ~~ ;!lv>~~
<:> ~ z "'iCD
~ 1<' x 80 CD~ 51 x '" z' lI:
'" ...... V> ~'"
~ :.:i 0 ~ ~8 ~5l Q~ CD ~oz ffi~ u; X
::0 '" Z '" CD v> f;;2:j"'",
'" xij ~~ ~8~
~ ~ ~ "'... ~ Cl Pl3E ::0
t: 00 ",""
~ "'c: !il8 :=~ i ;:!:!:jo ::o~o!:l
;-< ~ gg I:z !"1Q '" ~c:ncg
zo '" V> v>f;; p ?ixz
s: V> ~z Oil :co ::I"'il; ~ ::o~
~ ;;;! z?j 83E ::o1il~i!!
pl nV> ~:!Jn
;-< o~ z" en c::
il;i5 nO zGl~ P~i!:<
3E ::0- C'l...~
. % nz Iv>
p O' :!:jr- ~ ~
0 &~ ~t::l ~~~
~ 0 ~~~r-
~ '"
0 0 ~'" '" 0
~ 0 - aE >2"'i!s;!
0 ~- ~~5! ."C:rrI::f
n Z :::;v> ::0 P ... ~E~t5
0 0 '"'... !:l '" ~~~~
0 '" ~~ 0 '"
!:l ::0 ~
S '" ~~~
0 ,.
::0
...
I I UIII ~ n C) ~ I
~ I ~ ill ~8 g~~
!: ;0
... '" 00;
n V)~ !i l'I I i !~ii I",
l!! f o~ 'i::_
~~ 0
~ ~ Z;u
I d ~~ 0:>>
.0
<-< ~
I'J :>>0
NO ~'
~~ "'c (D
C F;:; N;u
Z N-; iD"
~~ ~ ~1i~ ~ ~ N ~
::; tl ;a
~~
,
ex:: ~~ ~ ~ ~
:g ~ ~~
"I ~3 III ::
..!:! Z .... ....
1-"1 .. ..
trN Z~ ::>
,~ ::>'" l2~
ON ~~~i If ~ ~
U<c ~
>-> ~
I o _ ~~ I
<cO i
trz i6~ :::to u
0 ~5
-:::;; :EQ iil II
"'I 8~
~~ Ig ~ lun ~ ... I w
tr 2
I 1
~ C) ! !
:I:
Vl
i5
~ r-I~ ~I.&J ,......w 0:: w
<cr w ~
>- ~ >- ~
~~ zO ~b~b~b~ . ~ .
Z .1 0 0
::; .-H Wit) i I ~ I ~ I ~ I I <:>
'" >-00 <~~~~~~ ;.... -..,. 0
<:> 0 z~ -'
z '" <C-H It) W '" w
W-H::;-H~-H~ ~ ~ :I:
- ~ -~ z Vl
>- 6 '--'0 ........2........::2 ~
Vl z Z
x ::; II a.. 110:: 110.. II a.. II :I: II G:
W z Oz i5 z<:>z:I:z:I: U
0 Z
"- ~ <:>0 <:> 0<:>0<:>0<:> 0 <:>
0 ~i= z i=zi=zi=Z ~ Z
a.. t;:; !!i~ i= ~!l2~ta~ta ~
Vl t;:;
0 -' X-' X X
>- w -,X-'X X -'
WW W WW WW WW W W
o ;Jui
lX~w~!i
o:I::I:....o
o..m....O:-'o:
~~lrfu6lr
o..~~o::glll
~~~~g,~
m o:;;/,
,,-::;I~o:o..z
oiri)WW<C
~~o:~i!'~
~!!'\i:-,Ir~
umO~Ou .
g >-::>8:::>15
<Cw>-::>!!'~
6~i!'gmm~
O:I: !!,OO
ZF-~m>->-<:>
~:I: Z
zffi>-w~ffi~
-l.&,. ~:Jl.&..~
w~t~ffiWlj
:I: ii:<C<C0:
>-....Wo.. z
1II~>lXlQ~o
~m~<C~~~
~~olri~0:8
zO~!iwO
~t::ggi!'Y::;
<C'o ir
Gj~~fil~z~
;d::iu:g::;O::i
.. a.. a.O:Uw
~!!!5~0t;;W~
!iii!'Sl!:lltoi!:a..
on
'" I
(.)
~
o..l/')
Zl
OU
~8
::>:1:
t.:lm
~..;
o
U-'
~~
zo
w
>-w
~lX
III
m
W
-'0:
~w
;t~
W
z:I:
011I
N.
ii:g
~X
~N
z~
OW
wt.:l
me
~a3
Ow
lt~
~
z
z
W
>-
~
<D <
~ --- Z :I: :I: :I: :I:
Z Vl Vl Vl !!!
lD W < ~ 15 15 15
>- Z 0
~~ < ~ Z Z WO::O: 0:: 0::
Z..... W~ W W ,......~,......~,......
~~ ~':H ~ I- ~ ,......~ ,......~ ,......~ ,......~ ,.....,
I--H Z-H Z-H I- -H :( -H ~ .....~
~. Z' Z, W. ~ . ~ . ~3= ~~f<f 3= f~ f~ .-H~f~f
Wo >-0 ~
UO UO zO 1-, ZI UO 00 - 00 000-0 ~ 0::; 0 0 0 0
5l~ ~.~ ~ .1 ~o <. 5l~ 0: .1 ~ 10:: 10:: I ~ I LaJ
ZN N UO >-. u ;,,~;....>'';... u .1 -' .1 -' .' -' _I -,.1 :;:
000 0..... <oot -,0 -'00 Ooot - 0 N- ~;:!j~g:~~~~~~
O::N O::N N wN W_ o::~ ::; - S~::i .....::; CD CD
lD~ lD~ -~ >-~ lD~ lD~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~Z~~~~~
Z B II 0 ~ II~
::i II ::i II ::; II lj II ::i II ii: II ~ II U II ~ II:I: II ~ II II:I: II :z
"-z "-z Oz Zz Oz "- Z <:> Z Vl z<:> Z<:>ZVlZ <:>zuzuzUzuz 0
<:>0 <:>0 <:>0 <:>0 <:>0 <:>0 <:> 0 <:> 0<:> 0<:>0<:>0 ~g~Q~g~g~g ~
~~ ~i= zi= ~~ Z~ zi= Z ~ Z i= z i=Zi=Zi=
!!i~ ta~ ~~ i= i= ~i= ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~
~~ !!it;:; ~t;:; Vl t;:; Vl Vl >
X-' x-' X-' x-' x-' X r;j X X w~r;j~r;j ~w~r;j~w~w~r;j ~
ww ww ww ww WW ww w W ww
LaJ
I
o~
I
W
)>
It
!(
....
",
!II
en
",
"
;-t
"
~
~
Z
C)
~
Cl
~
o
",
"
cit
5r-
0'"
"'-t
:a'" -t
~~ ~
",0 CD
:a:a r-
~~ 1"1
0-<
", en c...
Cl ~ (,.
:a0 _
~z I
Fa CD
"
:a~
g~
o
Zit
en~
l-t
,.,
:a
j;
Iii
,..
c:
p
01
I
~
"
:u
'"
a
UI
....
",
!II
~
a
,.,
:u
It
,..
Z
It
~
-t
,..
Z
Z
c:
,..
,.
~UI
za
z........
C:UI
~a
,.
:a!:
-<x
",
ao
~....
en
en
i
~
I
~
,.,
a
~
en
en
~
~
III
UI
a
01
o
I
a
o
;. ~
~
~
UI
o
I
a
o
ON
C:'
;0
z-t
C'l~
o'tl
'tIO
~~
:I::
en
en'"
~[;l
ZZ
C'l~
~~
",,,,
F~
enlil
~;o
~;!
C'lC'.S
~!
"'r-
en/Tl
:I:::g
~F
S~
c:0
~!!!
/Tl;;1
:1::0
?O
oz
:ro
'::j
5
Z
en
Z~~ !'J
d/Tl~
~ol-
/TI~ffl ~
d~)o :::u
'tIZ~ -t
N-tC E
-t~[;l N
o:il~ ~
....;;;
-ZOl
ziilo
Q.o
/Tl r-
enc31
~~'-.
)o~
-tz;o
iljO/Tl
lJl;:::jo
Q;o'"
r-:::l~
-co
....NI
'tI/TIN
o;oa
lJllJl.!.
!!!:ro
~F'::'
. lD....
/TIr-
lD
z!'I
8~
;00
.,,0
00
;olJl
~p
O2
/
..,1 .,.
en
o
c:
:a
o
r.'
~
o
en
~
Z ;0 -t -t"O 0)0
~~~ilj:r;oz
o~~ill~;;1f!l
5/T1~oe::I::~ r-
zP~illgj~:::l ~
C'l . ;;;;00 -
-t!!!::j~):ioZ Z
~i!i;;1:1::-t~lJl C)
:r ':Ii, :r
lJl6[;l,<dl<lg
:5F."lDO[;lEi
C'lo~"'gz
[;l!b:Qe:Pffl
-tZr-..,;o
/TlC'l!:(:!J _0
O-t 06Z0
~~~~F;r::~
'tIf;i~-t~g~
c Oz-t;;1
~~~,-C'llJlO
:::l'</Tle: 0....
~lDlJl!!lJ:!~O
/Tlo-"'.
$!e:F~~::j~
....lJl:e....." /Tl
[;l[;l;=i!ic~~
. ....r- ~",_
0s;:8:::llJl~
OM!!I~e::;;
/TI;o ."
~lD~~d~
;r::"'c, ",
Z;r:::l::i:O>_
"'0 z ['1:1:: lJl
~~C'l Oz
",0)0 ~~
)0)0 ill'"
OZ lJl
....0 ..,~
e: 0;0
~ ;0-<
0." -t
;;;~ 1"1
Yl ~ l::
"0
~d ~
;;1~ ~
;0 /TI :::u
~Q ~
~~
)0_ ~
~Bi 1"1
;;!o
!l!, z-
lJlr-
Zz C)
!'I~ II)
[;l"O
~8
.."
On
~~
il-t
~o
"'Oz
~
:::l
o
",
lJl
lJl
C
o
:r
~
l::
c:
h
:r::
z
C)
~d ~
:1::01"1
~~ 0
.... il 1"1
"'00
)or-
~~ ~
C'l 0 1"1
~~ "0
;:ez t
lJl~ ~
~'i2 0
OlJl z
lD'"
a::g
."F
;OlJl
!tie:
)0;0
~~
~Pl
iii."
[;l~
~iil
z
~~
....
lD
",
)0
al
f;i
....
o
~;;!:e;;!l<l "0
MlD~l!'f;i r-
;oJ;i:r/TIO ~
b: lJl.... Z
rn!A~",'tI -t
. ~z("c
I ~z II)
offlJ.iil ~
." e: )0)0 1"1
illlJlZ"tI 0
l<l[;lo~ -t
Z:e"'O 0
iil~~~ z
:l::01!j
oe:fl",
;0....
/TI d
_~z
f;;1~~
OZ"'/Tl
",en....
"'O~:ren
~ !j~
z~>o
..,)limZ
oE,)o
~!j/Tlz
)0-",0
:::l~("lJl
~Ol~
O"'lDO
Z!!!."o
~;;1ill~
"'0~3
"'OO~~
S;:~VIVI
Z:::l."..,
....os;:;o
~~~
lJl
UI....ID~
. . "':r
"'''',.
-t-t0-t
oo~ Cl
OlUl....-t
NN
oc -t
:a:l:: .....
-tZ ..-
",,, ~
:I:::a 1"1
"/TI
00
~s: VI
~ill VI
!!!~ I
~~ ~
en
~
<w~~ o~1 ."."zo z" /Tl~J;i /Tl:l:: I Z )0'" ~o I~ ....e: ~~~~ijjijj~ C ~5ilil~85~i:t' ~'''' ill~~S!" ;o)o;r::lJl~ "0
,,- COo /Tlz /Tl' ~Z)oO'
- -I' S;:;O::j~ ~~ g.:- Cl 0- ~ ~a a)o ."" o ~~ ~ "0
~)>)>-t "', Z~~/Tl ~iii~ c:~ r.' ,lJl !!I 0 ",/TlOO:::liil l:: ;O['1!!!!jo~en~ ~~ )0 oFe:-~ oO;;1F 1"1
lJl." ~en ~o 0:1:: . /Tl 1"1 6 ~ ~:::loo:e :I::",;o,!lll<l
....0" ;0 co 3l~ ;0 lJlZ~$!z )0 :I::_;oZ Z :::u
za'.. ~/Tl 0 zf'T11"1 " ZlJl J;i" 2~ .... !Q........C'l:l::Z ;olJl/Tl~~~al~i!i ~.0~ ;r::z",s;"'O 2~~~a -t l::
0;0 :r:: ."lJl ~ '-.." :rc ><oos;:)oo ~ :I::."o~ /Tl:l::z /Tl en ;0
-)>' ~~ Z e:oZ/Tl iil;;! ~illlJl ~~ /Tlz ~", ~05i/Tl . ;0 ~~~~!ij ~
)>;;0;;0 ~ ~1l ~ ~z ~~ oS;: 65i J;i!A~~lD'<;:::j Z 006~",e: Zc: ~-trrl lilal~05 II) Z
"'/Tl ~~ill~ NO ;:::j;;! zlJl ~ 8~ "O~iii ~ffl~ 0 ",~;o ~/TI""!!! ~ffl~ ",/Tl "';0 1"1 1"1
rrlOITl "'lJl ~;o~ ~GI ,e: OlJl/Tl,,;;: O:e"'c:Z
,Z ;0 Ei~ . /Tl/Tl-O Z r- Z
-.... iil "'/Tl EDo "~ ~o)o ~~.~" I~.... ;;~~~M <:r lJl
;;o(/)" 2en . ~~;o illlJl ~)o (; ~N :rl,..z'-!."C .." l' ", ~-lD/TlO 1"1 -t
lJlz e: ~." !o Q,<"'O",N 1"1 OOlJl~/TllJlo:glJl O/Tl" .., 0
o)>Sti fflPo /TlZ o..,)oO;:o;o/Tl e:z ~lJl!!!ZlJl
5~ ;0.., ~~ r- .... zo :::u . Z"''''Z'''OOO ~~ ~:r!!l~."
ZO C! ~~ ;oO~;O-<6;O ~lil~z~ -t
~21Tl /TIO Z iil, ~~ "z -t !!!",;o!!!"'ZS;:I:: II)
iZQ enO;o 0 C::r!:( ~ 0 <;OID~!j;:OZ OOOOOlJl..../Tl ;;;~~O~ 0 1"1
002 Z ~;a~ 0 ~o" /Tl ~~ ~g ;= /Tl:;;~z c5 /Tl [;l11l[;l....~
;0" o~ ~Cl :I:::r )li'f;i- :I::~ )00 !'I11l~"''''' z 1"1
2 () 0 p:e Ne: /TlS; )0 ~i: ~~[;lo N ~OOlJl~;r::z;; . ~..,~Cl 0
"';r:: "tIoS;: VIa ~~ "';r:: " lJlz 0 r-z :::! fT1 f'T1 :::0 Z'" ~;;1~~
(/)1Tl !:(:I:: :::l oZ'" _ VI 1"1 o III alOf;i;r:: Z
;:::je: po ~8 ED", ~ cl ;0 ~lJl 5iCl~8A'~lJl o"m~-t;tJ--
)>"U(/) ", :::u z~-<_:r.,,;;;~ [;l;olJlx /Tl0:::l....
;olJl ~)o ~ ~ED !'IV,! z;o /Tl:e .,,;0 "tI....z~ C)
2rrl .... . 0 ",a ." lJl~~~lJl....~ _ ....o/Tl;o;;;;; -~ . (;) ....
00)> dlD "':e,!ll ~, ~ /Tl e: z:r lJl5:r['1<0.......en 0.... /Tl"'C S;:OCl~
.lJl ~5 0'" ~;28~Fi!i? ....- oZ(,,;O II)
-;;0 ", ~~- "':-"', OlD o~ 0 COz ~ :1::;0 ClCl'" ~;;1;oo 00 :r"''''''' z)olJllJl
O~rrl ;r::;r:: /TlZ ~ olJl 00 .., 0.. /Tl/Tl ~e:z 00 ~~~J:!~g~'" ;oZ ",~llJl ~lJl~iii "0
;00 0'-. 00 ;0 z- ~....~z~Oal ;;0 1"1
0 e:e: /Tl r- ;0 ,~ 0 C , N iil~ Z"'OlJl",-OO.... ~,fl6
O)>~ Fi' e: /TI ~ED ;r:: lDN - Cl O/Tl ....~g~[;lz~~ '.., "'0 Q
:r0 ~gQ l'lill ", lJl /Tl :elJl ",0 ~"'O ;0"'0 e:",;:o ~/TlZlD
2-1)> _:r U1 lJl lJl . .... 0 !'Iz/Tl~ /Tl~ O;o~:eill~~~ !tis;: ....lJl. Q. )0 .."
;dOO Z/Tl o~~ I ~U1 ~'-. d ........0 ~ F~ ~~/TI)o~;;1 ~!'1~;; .., lJl n
po N ~z oo..../Tl
~~VI 01 ~1i Z olJl "tI/TIOFoOO~ ;oz J;i)ol~ .... 00 ~
021Tl 0 ;0 .... Z~VI;o~;o [;l....
lJli: ;ON /Tl 8~ ~gZ'OCl"'lJl lJlZOO "'en
iillJl5 I /TlO ;0 0 lD 'lJl;;!/Tl :1::, O. :I::~OlJl /Tl:l:: ~~~~
'0-1 cJ:I:: ", lJl lJlO C ",." lD - "tI - ",0~5i 0
)o~~ 0 O.!. 0 lJl ~Me:~~ ....z ~:I:::I::....[;l Z)o
./Tl :r 0;0 2 ~~ ~;;1 (,,~OlJl ..... ....
I"O 0 0 "'0 0 ./TI ....... .... 0 oo~;o~en~' - "'0 z
:~ Zo ;0 ;:0 0 e: "tI- lJl)o :r;o~ O:r..,.... 0;0 'I'/TI",~ l;le:~c II)
)>-1-1 o.,,/Tl ON 1 r- ~"'O ~ ,lD il'i~Ql!'ZID ~ )o"')ooCl:r zs;
~Q~ N 0 .e: -r- )o~(" lJl-;r::
2II ~!:( ", I'" 0 .......!;( , /Tl/Tl /Tl",,/TllJl-< o Iii ~/TIil'i!j
O~lJl 0 1 ~ 0 oz - o~ills;:~~~~ ~z"'o
OrrllTl e: N ", " .... [;liil;;18~:g )0 010 0.... !'1
fle: "1J~rr1 ~ ofii :e ;0 ~ 0 ;;.1[;llJlffl-<lDen;o z~ o:e,.,z c~~cl
CD 0 . lJl:l:: F Cl
"'0 ~~lJl .!.!'I ~ N ~o~,~~~~ ffl~ Z' 0
0..... "'0 0 .... :::l~en t:........g
("Z :::l:!(g J;i o~ 0 ", /Tl al O;:OZ/Tl~"" en/Tlo"'O
O({) Z ;0 0 > ",Cl;o [;l :::lz'<z"'z><;; ....lJl:ro
:^({) !J'o o ;0 .... 00 lD C 8;:::j ~f;liil 00.... o~ NO:rz ",.,,"
0 ZlD 0 ;00 ", ~ z lJlzal-soe:o clJl 1"tI[;llJl ("s;:~
N ill: lJl",,,, 0 [;l ;0;0 , . " ....",~;o~ill;o lD~/TlZ
"'0 o VI lJl C )0 ill~ lJl ", ....OenVlO z> NZ:r
..,c: 0 VI d Z ZZ", ." Oz ..,..,
, P lJl 00 OlJl 00 1....-<
~ ~.., ", ~ Cl;;O:l:: _0 )0 _
p Z 0 ..../Tl FO Z ;0;0
5 0 ", F F o :!( ~
Z d
I
l
en
m
en Om
" -
fqO~~
-!!Izen
::!J2::-I(5
~fj)(")Z
:::! 0)>
OQoZ
Z ilZ
en 0
o
.-
:~ Hnl~ n
i;l~ J~~~
~ ~w~~
t I ~ ~ ~~
G)
~S
OQ
a~
~~
;:xJ
~ ~ i
~ ~ i;I
" "
n \ , \\\
1 5\~'~[\1
~
i'~!-'
,.,~
Z U) ilCl~ ~~\ \ ," :-
0 !:t ~~:9 III
....
d ~~ \ \ \\\ ~
i'
" ~~\ ,.,
lJl o~ III
~ r'T1 ;1 ~~\l\\ ~
z
", n
0..
r'T1 0 %~ \~\
@~
~\\\
~
~ \~ (
0
Z ~~
!il -\
-
> -r
::J
~
.,
I
!;l
\\
\'u.
~~ ~C:..
~'"
0'" ~Jl~
l!ll= Cl6S1
r~ . ;11",
~~
8 z>
'" ,,~
~ i'>l
,.,";,
.. ~~
:t
,., "'z
on
...:t
~\
"'\"~
~
g~~
~~
Z
::0
00;
Iv.
iC~
o
5~
"0
<-<
)>0
",0
v.C
"'::0
"'....
'"
I
~,
tD
is'"
t:
~~ ~ ... ...
a:: ~fBiI ~ o 0
tl O;-~
~~ N _
'" Z .... ....
..!! ~'" Z~ ::> .. ..
e "'''' ~~ V)
:::JI")
0'" ~ ! ~s -
"i u<( <I:
>-> i .,
I o.
<(0
"'2 i6~ ..:;JO ~ ! ~~
0 i I
-::!' o~ o 11
I") I N Z
~~ :i 2 I UJ 2
'" d i
I UC) III~~ IE ,I 1
~
0
w --'
u
'" <(w W W
0'" "'''' u
1U.;:;5 w::> 0
~fiJ lDO z ~.
--'~J: <(w
=u ::i> o<::l
;;t~lIl U "'~
~o w<::l a.;::
:;: W z", a.z ~u u.0
u. :;:<::l&t;j ~a. ow --'
J: ~o w-
1Il u. u.u. uu. ",::>
a. 1Il 1Il1ll a. <Xl ""~~"'lIl::;W --' u. OlD
a. a. a. ~ ,5 ~w
0 <Xl~ ...."'_u--'_u ~lD ~'"
If) 0 o..,.~~~ o~ c:i ~--: ~;:;5~5;;t5'" OW w
I") N..-...-.........- "'~-u+i OOOOlDOU:;:wf2 lIlw wO "'I
a.9 ~O o~
::>:;: UU 0
~ OW ::><::l vi ' >-
W "'< g:Z Oz
~ <::l~ ~g '" .1 <(
1Il 1Il W ~'"
>- w a::
.... 1Il 0- ~O
1Il "'- 1Il:::; U::>
ci ~ ~~~ <::l ::>'" lD w Ww
Z 1Il0 Ow ~
0 W Z w ~~
~ W U ;:: <(!: Zo '"
t.J.~ .... U 1Il Z <(- U --'
G: :;: w
ct' . u. ci >-G: u. Vi 0::> OW Z W~
",u. W W ~~ . ~~ 0 ",0
Q.,"'ci:5 ~ 0 OW 0 >'" U I--'
~ <::l0 U -zlf) ~'"
.<(tiZ >U WU I 1Il-0 S211l Z
.w w lIl<::lO 1Il 00
og<(~ _ .L;':>-<W a.W "'u '" ~Q;N W~ 0 Wa:
<( LL",t.l fiJw"'U~ ::>1Il ;:;S'" ::> U> . 0", 0 <W
g:;:w~ci OZ J:O 0 ~~ w
WU8wVl ",0 Vl't w WW~ U~
:;:~~~~ a.ZW"'Vl <::la. U lDJ: ~ O~
Vl~~::>W Vl W~ 0 ~'" Z --'
0 OVlVl-U O:5tS~g: WW Vl~ '" O",W 0::>.0 a. wW
<5 0 Zu.ooL;': Vl'" Vl<(Vl a. ~WlD ~<(g lD~
<( <( VlO~<5 ~a.<::la.--, ::>--, VllD- ~a.~ ~Z'" w --'
--' 0 oOW--'<i! o <( ~U~ Vl []) ::J~
a: --' :;:~zi'j<( <(U'" Vi ",C3ui
~ W W OZ'" ~ o - Z O-~ USU ~ Z> --'
~ > w <5::>~:;::;:'" <(~0'30'" --'~U "'00 wE::.- -' ~'"
a: ::i > --'~~~~~ 0~Z5Z~ ~W ~~~ <( ~~Z ~> 3: VlW
::i UWa. Z --,UW G1wlr a.
Z U '" :;:<::lu.VlVl~ -'lD3:lD3:~ SVllll VlVllD <( ~~~ J:J:W <::l <::l0
0 u. 0 Vl~~ Z z'"
a: Z 9 0 0 Z Vl Vl~~ 0 Oa.
<::l 0 Z W VlU VlJ:W
W Vi u. '" Vl 3: Vl WZ~ --' o:!>-
~ W IOU. I'!:::i:) 5 ::>z
w Cl ~Uw ~:;:Z lD lD<(
:z: ('oj rri ..j .0
en
X\f~ ..L-,Ot
t
..zit Ot-,L
f
r-----------------,
r
1
~
Z
W
>
Z
W
<::l
,
<Xl
,
....
'"
I
in
I
I
0
Z
0 ;...
i= I
< ~
> ~
w
-'
- ,
~J
00 x ,
<( 0
Z :::; 1
0...,. N
i=1
~n
w
-'
w
,--,
I I
I I
I I
I I
L_--'
I
I
I
L_________________j
J
>-
W
~
Z
o
i=
<
>
W
-'
W
..9
u.
u.
o
o
Z
~
Vl
~
:::;
4J
n
~
,
....
If)
1
n
I
I
1
I
I
1
I'
1
1
1
I
I
L______________
,
Z
o
~
U
o
--'w
OVl
",0
~g
za.
<(-
~J:
Vllll
1
0..1
1
I
I
r---------------~:I
'" ,
:;:0 '"
I
,--, n
I I
Co I I
, I I
I") I I
III L_--'
I
0, I:
ldZ I
I
..9/t t-,9
Ii
0
Vl
Z
WW
UVl
~z
00
"';::
u < 00
x U::E
Z <( U
~ Z <>-
0 in 0 , zOO
0
i= N I i= I -0
< I 0 I < 0 ~~
> n ,...., > I")
W I") I w -'w
-' I -' !!!a.
w I CJ W J:O
Vl
I wO
I lD~
I ;;;j~
I
I ~z
w
I w:::E
I IQ 0 "'w (I')
L____ _________~~~ ~Q;
x::> z:
~---- ----------- G:S 0
I ~'" ~
I 5~
. :JZ
::>
ClO ~
zu
~ ~~ LaJ
I w
0, ffii IX g
ow LaJ Vl
woo !:i
..:g;;t 0
LaJ ....
~~i: :J: ....
0"'- (I') 0
za.~ z
II!
;>
'"
W
Vl
N I
r------------/----1
r---------~~~----~
ct..,
~z
Vlw
::>4J
<t'"
IU
XlIl
W
Z
z-
L;':~
--,Z
--'1Il
0,
5:;:
Vl:;:
o
lD
--'
W
..t-,9
a-a
bad
000
PoQ
PoQ
0_0
:'j
:..
I
<(
..91t 6
n n
I "" I
'" '"
-t @) <B rill III
-< z (/) -=1 II' I 4" MIN
z "'1J
0 0>> ~1o~~88 :o~z ~ 1"'1
-I ~'1P
0 n :0;1:1= 1IllTlClTl1zz .,1- 0 0
)> ~~1Il >ITlZZ lIl-l II11II111 I O;l:~ -t
'" r z-1Tl mx~ 1;a~ ~~o U) 0 I II II
~ c;l:r- r-'tI"'4Z CO ~
)> lIlCITl 1Tl0o~1Tl0", 0;1:0 Z
t.l;l:~ lIlf='lZITl:O::!~ ;oC~ hlllll
0 1I1111 c>;l:1Il
~Oc> 00 1Il1Tl0 ~~1Tl
0 o~~ F ~~8zlIl
fT1 o~~ ~~~ n l!;
(J) "Oe: r
(/) 01Tl~ ~~. 'tI1Tl1Tlr- II I ;I: .., fT1
'tIZ 2~>:O~>m ~ :0 )>
::!~ ... 1Il1Tl>ZITl .1111111 " g (/) !1I111111
:;0 ~~:!! ~1Tl>~5O:O N ;0
0 . )> ITl 1"'1
;I:~I= . O;l:l'1Z:Olil r-
)> 'tI /
~ZOlll~'tI 1'1 )>
C ;I: 1Il :0
OOJ: 'tIif"o ~ :1111111 :;0
n iii~~ >cOO~lIl ~ 1"'1 I 111111111
~;or- ~;I:;o~'<iii )> 0
:;0 :O;l:m ......>~r- ~ ."
0 ITlzlTl ?J::!:Z ITl ,...
(/) 01'10 1Tl1ll1Tl~" 11"11 1Il ~
~"'1Il0 0 ,...
(/) 000 OO~~. ;0 0 ,.,
z~~ 'tI 1111111111
iT! 'tI iT!'tI =i...o ITl ~
(J) Z ~ xu,,:!:J:r- RIIII "'~ ~
fT1 ;-t~... ::! ,ozlTl~ , "!.
n ~tl :;;o:O"'8z I
-t "lIlJ:z q
0 ';'0 ii..,=iITl...'" (,m
~1Tl..,~p, II/III
Z 0;> ~1Tl~~~'"
l/IlO :0 0:0
....l/I ~",:><:o:oe:
o~ ~ J: m
:0 'tIZ~!!! - U)a> oC)~ z
;00 c: ' ~8 =1 0
ITl :0- Z -I 'tI ~E U.
~o o !!l~r-'" ITl ....
-;I: :0 ~~ C)~~
-I'tI e:1II~ r- n
:1:> ;o1Tl :001 lilli, ~ (TI- (TIC: ~~~ ~
-0 1Tl;o"'4ITlO(TI X . ;r:
z... OITl-'tI;I: 0 ~~ U)
'tIO o~~~~ n ;:;:10 :0 (TI
" 0
r-Z zZ ;r: U)(TI 0 g
5i~ 1Il ..,' ~ 5~'"
;o~p, ~~~~ III 5 ..,>
!=' 'Oz ;r: :0
Z~ITlO 'tI :0 III [;j ~~~ (TI
l!;~~iT! ~1I11111 .". ITl E;~ g
ITl X ITlITl (TI
;o~~,=! ~CD~
;g1glTl o~~
'1l111111rr c:zO
00;0> ~o
;00 (TI III 0
zo:O
o~r n ,.,
:0 ~II~II
me:
-0
0...
0
Z
n
I '"
'"
)>
z Z
~ -t Z~
fT1
0 Z
U) Z
~ )>
0
0
Z
...,
<5
c
:;0
)>
-t
0
Z
"'1J
~
Z
I I !~III ~n G1() ~ I
~ I ~ ~ ~~ g~~ ;0
N F I~ nO; I-
n ~ i !~;~ Iu
0 s:_
li z o~ 0
~~ ~ " 2;0
0>
I on ~ a ~~ . 0
<-< !
In {;;I" i!i >0
NO ""I.
e ~z ~~ uC $!..
N::O
Z N-I Ct
~~ ~ ~~ N
~ .. ~ !lIj~ :::0 (Ii
..... .....
S 5
~~
"llm
of
"N
uz
C'l
D I r :0 ~2
fT1 0 "'z ......
? ~z 1Tle:
G) ;l:1Tl Z:O
1"'1 }>~ iTl~ ~(TI
z :<iii z< III <
C ~(TI - ITl
"ll~ :<~
ON 1Il~
" Z . N
e: ITl ,,~ :<~ 'tI0
-I ~ Z
e: 0
:0 > m~ "ll~ ,,~
ITl Z ~;o 0;0 ~;o
~ iT! ITl "Tl1Tl mlTl
2 :;; r- ~r-
iT! Z III ~1Tl (Tl
mlll III
Z > 1Il ~1Il 1Il
Z
>
J
c
I
~
f
~
Ii
jli'i'i'f.'~"' II
If. i "I · a l ~ ! 1
Ii I ... .~.b~ !
~
.~ 2J
~ON
~~if6
3r~m~
~o..cN
~:211i-
a. ';\
~~..
"'~-
g
OJ
------{z
I j
. ~
~
.....
d
~
E1
..::
I:J
~
....
~
...
CI)
i=
s:::
,-
ns
-
s:::
~
o
:E
~
~
ns
(.)
o
It)
I
,....
o
~
en
j
/7
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
July 21, 1993
RAM/BSE Communications Limited Partnership
dba RAM Facilities Management
10 Woodbridge Center Dr
Woodbridge, NJ 07095
RE: SP-93-15 .RAM/BSE Communications
Dear Sir:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on July
14, 1993, approved the above-noted request for to allow an
approximately 300 foot tower to be located on Carter's Mountain.
Please note that this approval is subject to the following
conditions:
1. Tower height shall not exceed 300 feet;
2. Compliance with Section 5,1,12 of the Zoning Ordinance;
3, There shall be no lighting of the tower unless required by a
federal agency. In the event that lighting is required,
only red lighting shall be used for nighttime obstruction
marking. All tower lighting shall be shielded so as to
minimize visibility from the ground;
4. Staff approval of additional antennae installation. No
administrative approval shall constitute or imply support
for or approval of, the location of additional tower,
antennae, etc., even if they may be part of the same network
or system as any antennae administratively approved under
this section.
Attachment C
+
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road. Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 - 5823
Fax (804) 972 - 4012
May 30, 2001
Reg Alford
1306 Municipal Road
Roanoke, VA 24012
RE: SP-00-72 Crown Orchard (NextellCrown Castle); Tax Map 91, Parcel 28
Dear Mr. Alford:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on May 16, 2001, unanimously
approved the above-noted request. Please note that this approval is subject to the following
conditions:
1. Approval of this special use permit shall only apply to the building described in th,e
applicant's request and site construction plans entitled "VA-064P-d Patterson
Mountain Co-Locate Guyed Tower", dated January 21, 2001; and,
2. None of the related antennas, nor any future antennas for use by other service
providers shall be installed on this tower prior to administrative approval, in
accordance with condition number 4 of SP-93-15 which states:
Staff approval of additional antennae installation. No administrative approval shall
constitute support for or approval of, the location of additional tower, antennae, etc.,
even if they may be part of the same network or system as any antennae
administratively approved under this section.
In the event that the use, structure or activity for which this special use permit is issued shall not
be commenced within eighteen (18) months after the issuance of such permit, the same shall be
deemed abandoned and the authority granted thereunder shall thereupon terminate. For
purposes of this section, the term "commenced" shall be construed to include the
commencement of construction of any structure necessary to the use of such permit within two
(2) years from the date of the issuance thereof which is thereafter completed within one (1)
year.
Before beginning this use, you must obtain a zoning clearance from the Zoning Department.
Before the Zoning Department will issue a clearance, you must comply with the conditions in
this letter. For further information, please call Jan Sprinkle at 296-5875.
Attachment n
it
"5 .{!
~~
~
.~ ~
:~ .8
~~
:=;
ii
~ zrl
.
"^
if"
~~
s
~.3.
1~
4i~
~~
~
ii
~
~~
~ ~
'ct i-<
~~
~~ ~~
'=>-r=U
1-,
.
\.
;
~
.', \~~:;
\.l
~
~
r:-
*
,
I
S ~'l., ,.!
Ie
I
I
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832
Fax (434) 972-4012
February 5, 2008
Stephen Waller, AICP
536 Pantops Center, PMB#320
Charlottesville, Va 22911
RE: SP2007-00051 Peacock (Weber Property) - Verizon Wireless PSWF (Sign # 82)
Tax Map 73, Parcel31D
Dear Mr. Waller:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on January 15, 2008, recommended approval
of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors by a vote of7:0.
o Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. The tower height shall not exceed ten (10) feet AMSL more than the AMSL height of the
reference tree.
2. The PWSF be installed as shown on plans approved by County Staff.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive
public comment at their meeting on February 13,2008.
rfyou should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to
contact me at (434) 296-5832.
Sincerely,
Summer Frederick
Senior Planner
Zoning and Current Development Division
SF/SM
o
CC: Cellco Partnership dlbla Verizon Wireless 1831 Rady Court Richmond, Va 23222
Weber, David Carl Trust; Michael Joseph Weber Trustee 1855 Westyiew Rd Charlottesville Va 22903
File
~ I 1
I..... I Jit I
c
o
c
ALBEMARLE COUNTY PLANNING
STAFF REPORT SUMMARY
Project Name: SP 07-051: Peacock (Weber Staff: Summer Frederick
Property) - Verizon Tier III PWSF
Planning Commission Public Hearing: Board of Supervisors Hearing:
January 15, 2008 February 12, 2008
Owners: David Carl Weber Trust (c/o Michael Applicant: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon
Joseph Weber - Trustee) Wireless
Acreage: 12.781 (TMP 73-310) Rezone from: Not applicable
Lease Area is smaller portion of total parcel. Special Use Permit for: Sec. 10.2.2 (48) which
allows for Tier III personal wireless facilities in the
RA Zoninq District
TMP: Tax Map 73, Parcel 310 By-right use: RA, Rural Areas, and EC, Entrance
Location: On the east side of east side of Dry Corridor; Property also has existing Special Use
Bridge Road (Route 708), south of 1-64 and north Permits SP1999-011, SP2000-31, SP2000-64,
of Dick Woods Road (Route 637). SP2003-008 allowing for personal wireless facility
towers and necessary ground equipment.
Magisterial District: Samuel Miller Proffers/Conditions: No
Requested # of Dwelling Lots: N/A DA- RA- Yes
Proposal: Construction of a one hundred (100) Compo Plan Designation: The Co'mprehensive
foot monopole with three (3) flush-mounted Plan designates this property as Rural Areas in
antennas, and a 365 square foot structure to Rural Area 3.
house necessary ground-based transmitting
equipment. Proposed lease area for all
equipment is 2,500 square feet.
Character of Property: This parcel is wooded Use of Surrounding Properties: All adjacent
around the perimeter with open pasture covering properties are residential (zoned RA) with the
its majority. nearest dwelling unit approximately 800 feet to the
northwest of the site.
Factors Favorable: Factors Unfavorable:
1. Site is minimally visible. Non identified.
2. No adverse impacts would be generated
by approval of this application.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of this application.
1 ~
I II' ).
STAFF PERSON:
Summer Frederick
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
January 15, 2008
February 12, 2008
o
AGENDA TITLE:
SP 2007-051 Peacock (Weber Property) -Verizon Tier III PWSF
APPLICANT:
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
David Carl Weber Trust (c/o Michael Joseph Weber - Trustee)
APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes to construct a one hundred (100) foot, metal monopole, fitted with three (3)
flush-mounted antennas and a two (2) foot long lightning rod. Transmitting equipment will be housed
within a prefabricated shelter that has measurements of 12'x 30.42'x 10.58' (W x L x H) and a stand-
alone emergency power generator will also be set at the tower's base. The property, described as Tax
Map 73 - Parcel 310, contains approximately 12.78 acres, and is zoned RA, Rural Areas and EC,
Entrance Corridor. This site is located in the Samuel Miller Magisterial District, on the east side of east
side of Dry Bridge Road (Route 708), south of 1-64 and north of Dick Woods Road (Route 637).
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan designates this property as Rural Areas in Rural Area 3.
REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW:
The proposed facility in this application will be within 200 feet of three (3) other personal wireless
service facilities, and so does not meet the standards for a Tier II facility application, necessitating an
application as a Tier III facility.
Sec. 18-3.1 defines a Tier III personal wireless service facility as "neither a Tier I nor a Tier II facility". 0
Sec. 18-5.1.40( d) - requirements for Tier II facilities - states that a facility shall not be located so that it
and three (3) or more facilities are located within a circular area having a radius of two hundred (200)
feet.
Sec. 18-10.2.2 (48) of the Zoning Ordinance allows for Tier III personal wireless facilities in the Rural
Areas [RA] Zoning District by Special Use Permit. Section 31.2.4.2 requires Planning Commission
review of applications for Special Use Permit.
PLANNING AND ZONING HISTORY:
SP1999-011 CV154 Ivy and 1-64 PWSF.- At it's meeting on May 19, 1999, the Board of Supervisors
granted approval of this special use permit with conditions allowing construction of a tower and
necessary ground-based equipment.
SP 2000-031 Alltel/I-64 East PWSF - At it's meeting on September 13, 2000, the Board of Supervisors
granted approval of this special use permit with conditions to allow construction of a tower with a
maximum height of 92 feet tall.
SP 2000-064 David Weber (Triton PCS) PWSF - At its meeting on April 25, 2001, the Board of
Supervisors granted approval of this special use permit with conditions to allow construction of a tower
with a maximum height of 94 feet.
SP 2003-008 David C. Weber Triton PCS Amendment PWSF - At its meeting on May 7,2003 the
Board of Supervisors granted approval of this special use permit with conditions to allow for the
replacement of ground-based equipment associated with previously approved and constructed
personal wireless service facilities.
o
2
c
o
c
1.
, i
'.. I
DISCUSSION:
The proposed personal wireless service facility (PSWF) will be contained within a 2,500 swaure foot
lease area on the Property. This site is located at an elevation of approximately 697 feet above mean
sea level (AMSL). The proposed PWSF will include a metal monopole, with a top height of one
hundred (100) feed (797' AMSL) that will be fitted with three (3) flush-mounted antennas, a two (2) foot
long lightning rod and coaxial cables that will run vertically inside the monopole. All ground-based
transmitting equipment and an emergency generator will be housed in a prefabricated equipment
shelter measuring 12' x 30.42' x 10.58' (W x L x H) that will be enclosed in a structure disguised to look
like a typical farm building. The monopole and antennas will be painted with Sherwin Williams Java
Brown, a matte brown enamel color.
The site is accessed by a short gravel drive that extends approximately fifty (50) feet east from the
northbound lane of Dry Bridge Road (Route 708) approximately 0.5 mile north of its intersection with
Dick Woods road (Route 637). The parcel is immediately south of Interstate 64. All of the adjacent
properties to the south, east and west of this site are zoned Rural Areas, and are either residential lots
or in agricultural production.
ANALYSIS OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST:
Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance below requires that special use permits be reviewed as
follows:
Will the use be of substantial detriment to adiacent property?
The proposed facility will be constructed in a manner meeting all requirements for a "treetop facility",
will be screened by substantial existing wooded areas and topography, and will be located in close
proximity to similar existing facilities, therefore it is staffs opinion that the proposal would not impose
any additional substantial detriment to adjacent property. The ground equipment shelter will be
screened from adjacent properties by existing trees.
Will the character of the zonina district chanae with this use?
The character of the zoning district will not change with approval of this use. The site is already the
location of three (3) similar facilities.
Will the use be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the zonina ordinance?
Staff has reviewed this request as it relates to the "purpose and intent" that is set forth in Sections
1.4.4 and 1.4.7 of the Zoning Ordinance, and as it relates to the intent specified in the Rural Areas
chapter of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 10.1). This request is consistent with both sections.
Will the use be in harmonv with the uses permitted by riaht in the district?
The proposed use will not affect nor restrict any adjacent or nearby by-right uses. No significant
adverse impacts on adjacent properties in the (RA) Rural Area district are anticipated.
Will the use comply with the additional reaulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance?
Analysis of compliance with regulations found within Section 5.0 is found later in this report. In order
to operate this facility, the applicant is required to comply with all of the Federal Communication
Commission (FCC) guidelines that are intended to protect the public health and safety from high
levels of radio frequency emissions and electromagnetic fields that are associated with wireless
broadcasting and telecommunications facilities.
Will the public health. safety and aeneral welfare of the community be protected if the use is
approved?
The public health, safety, and general welfare of the community is protected through the special use
permit process, which assures that uses approved by special use permit are appropriate in the
location requested. In this case, the proposed facility will give Verizon the ability to offer another
choice of personal wireless service communication by providing a full range of voice and data
3
i ,
I': ',.1
services in addition to the required E911 call services. This can be seen as contributing to the public
health, safety and welfare on a regional level.
Compliance with Section 5.1.40 of the Zoning Ordinance:
o
The county's specific design criteria for Tier III facilities as set forth in section 5.1.40 (e) are
addressed as follows.
Section 5.1.40 fe} Tier III facilities. Each Tier III facility may be established upon approval of a
special use permit issued pursuant to section 31.2.4 of this chapter, initiated upon an
application satisfying the requirements of subsection 5.1.40(a) and section 31,2.4, and it shall be
installed and operated in compliance with all applicable provisions of this chapter and the
following:
1. The facility shall comply with subsection 5.1.40(b) subsection 5.1.40(c)(2) through (9) and
subsection 5.1.40 (d)(2),(3),(6) and (7), unless modified by the board of supervisors during
special use permit review.
2. The facility shall comply with all conditions of approval of the special use permit.
Requirements of subsection 5.1.40(a) application for approval and section 31.2.4 special use permits
have been met. Compliance with Section 5.1.40(e) of the Zoning Ordinance: The County's specific
design criteria for Tier III facilities set forth in Section 5.1.40( e)( 1) and 5.1.40( e )(2) are addressed as
follows: [Ordinance sections are in italics]
Subsection 5.1.40fb) (1-5): Exemption from regulations otherwise applicable: Except as otherwise
exempted in this paragraph, each facility shall be subject to all applicable regulations in this chapter.
The proposed PWSF will be installed at a site where other similar facilities are already located.
Verizon's equipment shelter will be installed completely within the lease area which is within an area
already fenced, and will meet the required Rural Areas setbacks. The proposed lease area exceeds the
required tower setback distance equal to 100% of the tower's height from parcel boundaries shared
with adjacent lots. Attached site drawings, antennae and equipment specifications have been provided
to demonstrate that personal wireless service facilities (PWSF) regulations and any relevant site plan
requirements set forth in Section 32 of the zoning ordinance have been addressed.
o
Subsection 5. 1.40(c) (2): The facility shall be designed, constructed and maintained as follows: (i) guy
wires shall not be permitted; (ii) outdoor lighting for the facility shall be permitted only during
maintenance periods; regardless of the lumens emitted, each outdoor luminaire shall be fully shielded
as required by section 4.17 of this chapter; (iii) any equipment cabinet not located within the existing
structure shall be screened from all lot lines either by terrain, existing structures, existing vegetation, or
by added vegetation approved by the county's landscape planner; (iv) a whip antenna less than six (6)
inches in diameter may exceed the height of the existing structure; (v) a grounding rod, whose height
shall not exceed two (2) feet and whose width shall not exceed one (1) inch in diameter at the base and
tapering to a point, may be installed at the top of facility or the structure; and (vi) within one month after
the completion of the installation of the facility, the applicant shall provide a statement to the agent
certifying that the height of all components of the facility complies with this regulation.
The proposed personal wireless service facility (PWSF) does not require the installation of guyed wires
and the facility does not include any whip antennas. The ground-based equipment will be screened by
existing vegetation and topography. The facilities grounding rod meets all required measurements. The
facility will only have one outdoor light fixture attached to the proposed shelter and it will only be used
by Verizon's technical operations staff during times when night-time maintenance of the site is
necessary.
o
4
o
o
o
1.
,1
. I
Subsection 5. 1.40(C) (3): Equipment shall be attached to the exterior of a structure only as follows: (i)
the total number of arrays of antennas attached to the existing structure shall not exceed three (3), and
each antenna proposed to be attached under the pending application shall not exceed the size shown
on the application, which size shall not exceed one thousand one hundred fifty two (1152) square
inches; (ii) no antenna shall project from the structure beyond the minimum required by the mounting
equipment, and in no case shall any point on the face of an antenna project more than twelve (12)
inches from the existing structure; and (iN) each antenna and associated equipment shall be a color that
matches the existing structure. For purposes of this section, all types of antennas and dishes
regardless of their use shall be counted toward the limit of three arrays.
The proposed antenna configuration will consist of one sector with three (3) panel antennas that
measure 72.44" x 6.06" x 4.13", giving each antenna an area of approximately 439 square inches.
These antenna will be installed using "pipe-mounts" that will allow for any required amount of down-
tilting without exceeding ordinance requirements for flush-mounts.
Subsection 5. 1.40(c) (4 and 5): Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a tree
conservation plan prepared by a certified arborist. The plan shall be submitted to the agent for review
and approval to assure that all applicable requirements have been satisfied. The plan shall specify tree
protection methods and procedures, and identify all existing trees to be removed on the parcel for the
installation, operation and maintenance of the facility. Except for the tree removal expressly authorized
by the agent, the applicant shall not remove existing trees within the lease area or within one hundred
(100) feet in all directions surrounding the lease area of any part of the facility. In addition, the agent
may identify additional trees or lands up to two hundred (200) feet from the lease area to be included in
the plan.
Subsection 5. 1.40(c) (5) The installation, operation and maintenance of the facility shall be conducted in
accordance with the tree conservation plan. Dead and dying trees identified by the arborist's report may
be removed if so noted on the tree conservation plan. If tree removal is later requested that was not
approved by the agent when the tree conservation plan was approved, the applicant shall submit an
amended plan. The agent may approve the amended plan if the proposed tree removal will not
adversely affect the visibility of the facility from any location off of the parcel. The agent may impose
reasonable conditions to assure that the purposes of this paragraph are achieved.
Verizon has already contracted Van Yahres Tree Company to provide a tree conservation plan that will
be prepared by a certified arborist. In order to ensure there is no significant impact to any of the trees
that will remain, the conservation plan will be completed prior to the submittal of a building permit
application for this facility. Recommendations of a tree conservation plan will then be integrated into
the construction process and followed on all portions of the Property that will be affected by the
construction of the proposed facility.
Subsection 5. 1.40(C) (6): The facility shall be disassembled and removed from the site within ninety (90)
days of the date its use for personal wireless service purposes is discontinued. If the agent determines
at any time that surety is required to guarantee that the facility will be removed as required, the agent
may require that the parcel owner or the owner of the facility submit a certified check, a bond with
surety, or a letter of credit, in an amount sufficient for, and conditioned upon, the removal of the facility.
The type and form of the surety guarantee shall be to the satisfaction of the agent and the county
attorney. In determining whether surety should be required, the agent shall consider the following: (i)
the annual report states that the tower or pole is no longer being used for personal wireless service
facilities; (ii) the annual report was not filed; (iii) there is a change in technology that makes it likely that
tower or pole will be unnecessary in the near future; (iv) the permittee fails to comply with applicable
regulations or conditions; (v) the permittee fails to timely remove another tower or pole within the
county; and (vi) whenever otherwise deemed necessary by the agent.
5
I
I C J
Should use of the antennae site in this location become discontinued at anytime in the future, Verizon
and/or its assignee(s) will be required to remove the facility within 90 days.
Subsection 5.1.40(c)(7): The owner of the facility shall submit a report to the agent by no earlier than .
Mayor and no later than July 1 of each year. The report shall identify each user of the existing
structure, and include a drawing, photograph or other illustration identifying which equipment is owned
and/or operated by each personal wireless service provider. Multiple users on a single tower or other
mounting structure may submit a single report, provided that the report includes a statement signed by
a representative from each user acquiescing in the report.
Verizon shall submit an annual report updating the user status and equipment inventory of the facility in
the required time period.
Subsection 5. 1.40(c) (8): No slopes associated with the installation of the facility and accessory uses
shall be created that are steeper than 2: 1 unless retaining walls, revetments, or other stabilization
measures acceptable to the county engineer are employed.
No slopes of 2:1 or greater will result from the construction of the proposed facility.
Subsection 5. 1.40(c) (9): Any equipment cabinet not located within an existing building shall be fenced
only with the approval of the agent upon finding that the fence: (i) would protect the facility from
trespass in areas of high volumes of vehicular or pedestrian traffic or, in the rural areas, to protect the
facility from livestock or wildlife; (ii) would not be detrimental to the character of the area; and (iii) would
not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare.
Verizon is proposing to extend the existing fence currently surrounding existing PSWF.
Section 5. 1.40(d) (2): The site shall provide adequate opportunities for screening and the facility shall be.
sited to minimize its visibility from adjacent parcels and streets, regardless of their distance from the
facility. If the facility would be visible from a state scenic river or a national park or national forest,
regardless of whether the site is adjacent thereto, the facility also shall be sited to minimize its visibility
from such river, park or forest. If the facility would be located on lands subject to a conservation
easement or an open space easement, or adjacent to a conservation easement or open space
easement, the facility shall be sited so that it is not visible from any resources specifically identified for
protection in the deed of easement.
The proposed PWSF will be screened by a strip of existing trees on the western, southern and northern
sides. The eastern side of the proposed lease area is bordered by an open field. No trees will need to
be removed in order to install the facility and the monopole will blend in with the trees between the site
and Route 708. Existing trees will also provide screening of the site from Interstate 64. Because the
site is not densely wooded, Verizon in locating the ground equipment shelter within the field in order to
minimize the amount of disturbance within the dripline of existing trees. In order to mitigate the visibility
of the shelter, the structure will have an outward appearance of a typical farm building.
Section 5. 1.40(d) (3): The facility shall not adversely impact resources identified in the county's open
space plan.
The proposed PWSF will not impose any adverse impacts upon open space resources. The
Architectural Review Board has reviewed, and provided comment on this application (Attachment). No
significant negative impacts have been identified.
Section 5. 1.40(d) (6): The top of the monopole, measured in elevation above mean sea level, shall not 0
exceed the height approved by the commission. The approved height shall not be more than seven (7)
feet taller than the tallest tree within twenty-five (25) feet of the monopole, and shall include any base,
6
o
o
o
"
I I
.
foundation or grading that raises the pole above the pre-existing natural ground elevation; provided that
the height approved by the commission may be up to ten (10) feet taller than the tallest tree if the owner
of the facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the commission that there is not a material difference
in the visibility of the monopole at the proposed height, rather than at a height seven (7) feet taller than
the tallest tree; and there is not a material difference in adverse impacts to resources identified in the
county's open space plan caused by the monopole at the proposed height, rather than at a height
seven (7) feet taller than the tallest tree. The applicant may appeal the commissioner's denial of a
modification to the board of supervisors as provided in subsection 5.1.40(d)(12).
Verizon is requesting permission to construct a monopole with a maximum height of no more than ten
(10) feet taller than the reference tree. The reference tree has been identified as a 42" caliber Oak tree
that is approximately 2.9 feet away from the proposed location of the monopole.
Section 5. 1.40(d) (7): Each wood monopole shall be a dark brown natural wood color; each metal or
concrete monopole shall be painted a brown wood color to blend into the surrounding trees. The
antennas, supporting brackets, and all other equipment attached to the monopole shall be a color that
closely matches that of the monopole. The ground equipment, the ground equipment cabinet, and the
concrete pad shall also be a color that closely matches that of the monopole, provided that the ground
equipment and the concrete pad need not be of such a color if they are enclosed within or behind an
approved structure, far:;ade or fencing that: (i) is a color that closely matches that of the monopole; (ii) is
consistent with the character of the area; and (iii) makes the ground equipment and concrete pad
invisible at any time of year from any other parcel or a public or private street.
The monopole and all antennas will be painted Sherwin Williams Java Brown. This is a color that has
been used from previously approved PWSF monopoles elsewhere in the County. The prefabricated
shelter that will house the ground-based equipment will have an outward appearance of a typical farm
building.
Section 5.1.40(e)2: The facility shall comply with all conditions of approval of the special use permit.
The facility complies with all conditions of approval of the special use permit (Section 32.2.4):
Section 704(a)(7)(b)(I)(JI) of The Telecommunications Act of 1996:
This application is subject to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which provides in part that the
regulation of the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities by any
State or local government or instrumentality thereof (I) shall not unreasonably discriminate among
providers of functionally equivalent services; (II) shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the
provision of personal wireless services. 47 U. s. c.
In order to operate this facility, the applicant is required to comply with the FCC guidelines for radio
frequency emissions that are intended to protect the public health and safety. Neither the
Comprehensive Plan nor the Zoning Ordinance prohibits the provision of personal wireless services.
However, both do implement specific policies and regulations for the sighting and design of wireless
facilities. In its current state, the existing facilities and their mounting structure all offer adequate
support for providing personal wireless communication services. The applicant has not provided any
additional information regarding the availability, or absence of alternative sites that could serve the
same areas that would be covered with the proposed antenna additions at this site. Therefore, staff
does not believe that the special use permitting process nor the denial of this application would have
the effect of prohibiting or restricting the provision of personal wireless services.
7
, ..
~
SUMMARY OF STAFF REVIEW OF SP 07-038:
Factors favorable:
Staff has identified the following favorable factors:
o
1. The construction of antennae and equipment subject to this special use permit would not restrict
any of the uses that are permitted by right or impose any additional impacts on adjacent properties.
2. The new ground-based equipment shelter will be minimally visible from areas outside of the
facility.
3. Minimal clearing or other disturbance is necessary for the placement of the monopole and
equipment.
4. The balloon test photos indicate that adjacent properties will have little or no views of the
proposed PSWF.
Factors Unfavorable:
Staff has identified no unfavorable factors to this request.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions
1. The tower height shall not exceed ten (10) feet AMSL more than the AMSL height of the
reference tree.
.
2. The current owner and any subsequent owners of the tower and its supporting facilities shall
submit a report to the Zoning Administrator by July 1 of each year. The report shall identify each
personal wireless service provider that uses the facility, including a drawing indicating which equipment,
on both the tower and the ground, are associated with each provider.
3. All equipment and antennae from any individual personal wireless service provider shall be
disassembled and removed from the site within ninety (90) days of the date its use is discontinued. The
entire facility shall be disassembled and removed from the site within ninety (90) days of the date its
use for personal wireless service purposes is discontinued. If the Zoning Administrator determines at
any time that surety is required to guarantee that the facility will be removed as required, the permittee
shall furnish to the Zoning Administrator a certified check, a bond with surety satisfactory to the County,
or a letter of credit satisfactory to the County, in an amount sufficient for, and conditioned upon, the
removal of the facility. The type of surety guarantee shall be to the satisfaction of the Zoning
Administrator and the County Attorney.
4. The PWSF be installed as shown on plans approved by County Staff.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Applicant's application package
B. Staff photos of existing site
C. ARB review documents
o
8
,
'-
Peacock Hill / Weber Property
Special Use Permit Application
Fora
Tier III Personal Wireless Service Facility
Located at
If""
53 Dry Bridge Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
......
Submitted by
.
verlZQllwiteless
1831 Rady Court
Richmond, VA 23222
""I!I'
....
Attachment A
.....
Contents
Introduction / Project Description
Site Photos
Equipment Camouflage Building Renderings
Tax Map
Plat
Site Survey
Antenna Specifications
Lighting Specifications Cut Sheet
-
-
...
INTRODUCTION / PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
..
TIER III PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY
VERIZON WIRELESS
"PEACOCK HILL" - WEBER PROPERTY
Proiect Descriotion:
Cellco Partnership, operating as Verizon Wireless ("Verizon"), respectfully requests approval
of a special use permit to allow the installation of a Tier III Personal Wireless Service
Facility (PWSF) on an approximately 12.78 acre parcel ofland, located at 53 Dry Bridge
Road (State Route 708) and identified as Tax Map 73 - Parcel47N (the "Property"). The
Property is located in the Samuel Miller Magisterial District in Albemarle County. A special
use permit is required because one of the requirements of the Tier II criteria will not be met
request. This specific requirement deals with the proximity ofVerizon's PWSF to three
existing facilities [5.1.40(d)(4)], all of which were approved with special use permits.
Section 3.0 of the zoning ordinance defines a Tier III facility as "a personal wireless service
facility that is neither a Tier I nor Tier II facility, including a facility that was not approved
by the commission or the board as a Tier II facility."
The proposed PWSF facility will be contained within a 2,500 square foot lease area on the
Property. The site is located at an elevation of approximately 697 feet Above Mean Sea
Level (AMSL). The proposed PWSF will include a metal monopole, with a top height of 100
feet (797 AMSL) that will be fitted with three (3) flush-mounted antennas, a 2-foot long
lightning rod and coaxial cables that will be run vertically inside the monopole. All ground-
based transmitting equipment and an emergency generator will be housed in a prefabricated
equipment shelter measuring 12' x 30.42' x 10.58' (W x L x H) that will be disguised by an
outer structure disguised to look like a typical farm building. The monopole and antennas
will be painted with Sherwin Williams Java Brown - #6090, which is a matte enamel color
that has been previously approved as an appropriate color for Tier II facilities at other sites in
Albemarle County.
Network Obiectives:
Verizon recently secured a license from the Federal Communications Commission to provide
Personal Communications Services within a new market that includes the County of
Albemarle, City of Charlottesville and other surrounding counties. These services range
from phones with voice, data, text, video and GPS capabilities, to wireless broadband
solutions for personal and business computer systems.
Verizon does not currently offer any service options locally, providing limited services
within this market only to existing customers from other areas through roaming agreements
with another wireless carrier. There had been no opportunities for Verizon to offer the full
range of services until the FCC license was obtained.
Verizon has identified several sites throughout the market that will be integral to establishing
this service. Once all of the proposed sites are "on-air", V erizon will be able to provide
potentially seamless in-building, in-car and on-street coverage throughout the market. By
providing coverage within this market, it is Verizon's objective to ensure that the full range
of services will be available to existing customers, while also allowing an additional,
competitive option for access to wireless services by future customers.
., T .
"Y. _1
T'Ito"(, TC1T"
The specific facility proposed with this application will establish in-building coverage for the
nearby residential units, and will support in-car coverage for customers traveling on 1-64 by
connecting its service with the other antenna sites that will be installed to the east and west
between Crozet and the City of Charlottesville.
Character of the Area:
The Property is zoned Rural Areas (RA) and Entrance Corridor (Ee) overlay district. All of
the surrounding properties are zoned Rural Areas. The proposed PWSF will not substantially
impact the rural character of the surrounding due to the number of tall trees surrounding the
site and the use of an outer structure to conceal the shelter, similar to the technique that was
used for AT&T's ground equipment at this site.
The proposed monopole will be located approximately 71 feet west of the right-of-way for
Route 708 at the edge of a wooded a area that runs adjacent to the road. The concealed
equipment shelter will be located approximately 75 feet from the road at the edge of a field.
Access to the facility will be taken from the existing gravel road that provides access to three
other existing treetop PWSFs on the Property and then turns south. The nearest off-site
dwelling unit is nearly 500 feet northwest of the proposed PWSF site. None of the resources
that are defined as avoidance areas in Section 3.1 of the zoning ordinance are located on or
within close proximity to this site.
Compliance with Section 5.1.40 of the Zonin!!: Ordinance:
The County's specific design criteria for Tier II Facilities, set forth in Section 5 .1.40( d), are
addressed as follows:
· 5.1.40(d)(1) - The facility shall comply with subsection 5,1.40(b) and subsections
5.1.40(c)(2) through (9),
. Subsection 5.1.40(b) 0-5): The proposed PWSF will be in compliance with the setback
regulations and all other area and bulk regulations and minimum yard requirements are
being met with this request. Verizon has selected a location for the proposed monopole
that exceeds the required tower setback distance equal to 100% of the structure's height
from all parcel lines shared with adjoining lots. The monopole's distance from the public
right-of-way is less than 100% of its height, similar to the existing PWSFs.
The attached site drawings, antenna and equipment specifications are being
provided to demonstrate compliance with the PWSF regulations and relevant site
plan requirements, set forth in Section 32 of the zoning ordinance.
. Subsection 5.1.40(c)(2): The proposed monopole does not require the installation of
guy wires, nor will it be fitted with any whip antennas without any further County
approvals. The proposed grounding rod complies with the County's size
requirements. The facility will only have one outdoor light fixture attached to the
proposed shelter which will only be used by Verizon's technical staff during times
when maintenance of the site is undertaken. Verizon is currently in the process of
securing the design for a retrofitted shield to go on the original light, or for a
replacement light fixture to ensure that the facility will be in full compliance with
Section 4.17 of the zoning ordinance prior to construction. Verizon is proposing to
conceal the shelter within a "site-built" structure that will have the outward
appearance of farm building to ensure compatibility with the character of the area.
'lT~_:_~_ UT:_~l~~~ nUTC1T:'
Tl_ __ "'"
1 TY.11 /'l:TT 1
. Subsection 5.1.40(c)(3): The proposed antenna configuration will consist of one
sector with three panel antennas (Anphenol Antel Model # BXA-I85085/12) that
measure 72044" x 6.06" x 4.13", giving each antenna an area of approximately 439
square inches. These antennas will be installed using "pipe-mounts" that will allow
for any required amount of down-tilting without exceeding the County's
requirements for flush-mounts (12-inches maximum between the face of the
monopole and the face of the antenna). All antennas will be painted to match the
color of the monopole.
. Subsection 5.1.40(c)(4 and 5): Verizon has already contracted Van Yahres Tree
Company to provide a tree conservation plan that will be prepared by a certified
arborist. In order to ensure there is no significant impact to any of the trees that will
remain, the conservation plan will be completed prior to the submittal of a building
permit for this facility. Recommendations of the tree conservation plan will then be
integrated into the construction process and followed on all portions of the Property
that will be affected by the construction ofVerizon's facility.
. Subsection 5.1.40(c)(6): Should use of the antenna site in this location become
discontinued at anytime in the future, Verizon and/or its assignee(s) will be required
to remove the facility within 90 days.
. Subsection 5.1.40(c)(7): Verizon shall submit an annual report updating the user
status and equipment inventory of the facility in the required time period.
. Subsection 5.lo40( c )(8): No slopes that are 2: I or steeper will result from the
construction of this facility.
. Subsection 5.1.40( c )(9): The proposed facility will be adjacent to a field that is often
occupied by cattle and/or horses, so Verizon is proposing to expand the fence that
currently surrounds the existing PWSFs. The proposed fence will consist of wooden
posts and wire to match existing fence in order to ensure separation from the
livestock, while also maintaining the agricultural character of the area. Therefore, the
Verizon facility will not be detrimental to the character of the area or the general
welfare, safety and health of the surrounding properties and their residents.
· Section 5.1.40(d)(2) - The proposed PWSF will be located between a strip of tall trees
and an open field. No trees will need to be removed in order to install the facility and
the monopole will blend in with the trees between the site and the road when viewed
from Route 708. The monopole will also be provided front screening and back drop
when view from 1-64. Because this site is not densely wooded, the ground equipment
shelter is being located in the field to help reduce the amount of disturbance within
the driplines of the few trees that surround this site and the other existing facilities.
Therefore, in order to mitigate the visibility of the shelter, it will be concealed within
a structure that has the outward appearance of a typical farm building.
· Section 5,1.40(d)(3) - The proposed PWSF should not impose any adverse impacts upon
open space resources.
. Section 5.1.40(d)(4) - Because this facility will be located where it and three other
PWSF's could be enclosed within a circle that has a 200-foot radius, this proposal
requires a special use permit.
· Section 5.1.40(d)(5) - The monopole will have a base diameter that is no greater than 30
inches and a top diameter that is no more than 18 inches.
. Section 5.1.40(d)(6) - Verizon Wireless is requesting permission to construct a monopole
with a top height that will be no more than 10 feet taller AMSL than the reference tree.
This reference tree has been identified as a 42" caliper Oak tree that is approximately 2.9
feet away feet away from the proposed location of the monopole. Due to the limited
visibility of this site from surrounding properties. Verizon is requesting permission to
install a monopole that will be 10 feet higher than the tallest tree. Verizon anticipates
that there will not be any material difference in adverse impacts to resources identified in
the county's open space plan caused by a monopole at the proposed height, rather than
seven (7) feet taller than the reference tree.
· Section 5,1.40(d)(7) - The monopole and all antennas will be painted Sherwin Williams
Java Brown #6090. This is a color that has been used for previously approved PWSF
monopoles in Albemarle County. The prefabricated shelter that will be concealed within
another structure that will have the outward appearance of typical farm building.
. Section 5.1.40(d)(8) - All coaxial cables and service lines running vertically from the
transmitting equipment to the antennas will be located inside the monopole.
. Section 5.1.40(d)(9-13) - Verizon has reviewed and understands all of the remaining
criteria for Tier II Personal Wireless Service Facilities and will provide any additional
information or assistance to ensure that these standards are met.
Conclusion:
Verizon Wireless is confident that aside from the its proximity to other existing facilities, the
proposed Personal Wireless Service Facility will meet the other siting and design criteria that
are normally applied Tier II facilities and relevant goals and objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan. The approval of this PWSF application will contribute to the deployment of a highly
reliable personal communications system in this new market, providing Albemarle County
residents and those traveling on Interstate Rout 64 an additional option for high quality
personal communications services
Sincerely,
~-
Stephen Waller, AICP
Site Development Consultant
Verizon Wireless, Charlottesville Market
.
..
. ,
..
SITE PHOTOS
Close up view of the proposed monopole location
View of the proposed monopole and equipment shelter location and an existing facility
.s,,->'. 'Y,
View to the west of the trees near the site and existing PWSFs
...~~~~~-~ .
View to the west of the proposed PWSF site and building screening existing equipment
v,
, ,"'>1
View north toward the proposed monopole location
View south toward the proposed monopole location and existing fence
View to the north toward trees surrounding the existing PWSF sites
View to the north from in front of the existing PWSF sites
View of the monopoles for two of the existing facilities south of the proposed PWSF
View to the east of access from Route 708
View to the north of the tree line along Route 708
View toward the south of the site on Route 708 from the bridge across 1-64
..
EQUIPMENT CAMOUFLAGE
BUILDING RENDERINGS
<(
z
o
I-
~
W
-.J
W
I-
Z
o
cr:
u..
:~
'~:
t:
,.
.,;.
i'<'
.~
:/
>
en
z
o
I-
~
W
-.J
W
I-
Z
o
cr:
u..
z
o
I-
~
W
-.J
W
cr:
<(
w
cr:
z
o
I-
<(
>
W
-.J
W
W
o
(j)
l-
I
(9
cr:
z
o
I-
<(
>
W
-.J
W
W
o
(j)
I-
u..
W
-.J
I
. ,
.
T AX MAP
Scale
800
1,600
Note,' This ma ' Feet 2,400
and shows P IS tor dispJa
See Map :"celS as of 1z~rposas only
Introduction for ::~..
ditlonal details.
087
Albemarle
County
Tax Map:
073
I
( I . ,
..
PLAT
. ':,{ S 6 0 rAGEO 0 3 7
.
INTERSTATE 64
N
!"
. ".;.J.. f
-..-.-..-------- .-
r
.
~r
\
-\
~
::.-
,""'-_:-:-\
.~
\
\
\
I"
I
,
I
i
I,
\
\
\
\.
I flC
".\ 103 Ie
\ porce '
\
'^.
.,
\
70.00 Ac
Parcel B
A"
n\ ,
"\
\
" .~; .....;).
,
'\
\
\
\\ t,. ;.~ .
" ~ \ ~~'~\;_:~
- r ;"'J ~J t~
-4 \.... .~~ -.~',c' .d" t'~, \
~ -;:\~", ," :,-:'~. ~
~ 5'.""~;,,'" "'",.",.;.,:, . ,-,co', ~IT-1"~ ",.0"
=,r.J~ ~ .\\~
.. .. \.,"' ROUTE 637 "~~".:....'>..~.:\:~.~,:;.\~
STATE '6-, 0- . _
"
"
~ :':1;('
" ~,'~. .::1;1 .J!.;;t.:,
~"" .<.~,
".
PLAT
SHOWING
PARCELS 8 a C CONTAINING 80.3/ ACRES
BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 31 TAX MAP 73
LOCA TED NEAR IVY
ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
"j"'I"'I';-r i"'I'''I'','I'1 ' I ' . ' I ' , ' I' J ~ I' I 'I ' "I 'I' I ' I '1'1 ' 1'1' 1'1 ' 1'1 ' I ' I' 1'1'1'1' 1'1'1'1'1' i i 1'1'1 ' I ' \.
HI......O t; 3 -4 5 ~ ~
~
1
Si!~ .11 Cil. III . Ljl all 61 "I LI . 51 .. t z , ~... 4
luulBu HIIlIIIJIlll1hlll lfllllllilllillllllllllllllll 11I111111 1lI11llllllUllWlulIIIltlllllllluluulunllllduuluuluullluluuJ
SCALE, I" = ~QQ'
WILLIAM S. ROUDA8USH, 'HC.
A Proful;o.a' Cor-porotioiJ
CUT.F/fD LAND SUR\'EYOU
C'anotfesvUI. Vl,.,I.la
FIll NO. ._--1 .
OAT! SP:~.!.f!-I?~I, 1978
s.....,.." """'"'~ ..,,~, , hi.... C.. j~ =~'J
..-..-----.--...........~~~;;;;;,;:.::iiiiii25iii:~,~~.:,.~:i::ij:!iiif_.]i:~~,~..~~;.
"
......
.-,
"'"
"
,
.
. ,
SITE SURVEY
'1 ia ~I
~ il;!
~ i~U
~ d~
.! 0
~ il
~r
~~~
tflm~!oQ
!J:!o ~
~~~I;,
t:I~~ii:
~J8~rJ
e~~i~
<vi~ovi'
~~lB~~
LLgZOOg
~~ g ~~
~aoc:ia
~n8~
~~~~~
g~ ~ ~~
en !~~~~
!5 ~l';;~l'
z ~~;::-~iD
>- z85"d-e
w ~~5~~
~ g~~~~
~ 1-a.5a.D.-
o
~
~,.
g~
"'0
w"
~~
~z
~~
~~
Z
~~
~J=
"'0
~~
~:i:
~~
g@
If!l
~e,
"''''
"'..
U.
~;;! !Q
~g" ....~.
o.!.!( _
~as ~
-'
N ..;
~i
@~g
~8~
t;~~
~g~
~~~
;~~
...
~i
~
o
~
Z
o
ti
~
~
~
Z
~
i'5
'"
g
t;
~
ffi
liii!
z5
!B
~~G
~~i!'
2~!fl
~!;;!
j;;~Ei
Vio!!5
~~~
N
b::g)
~~
ON
u'"
~:
"'z
o
~~
ww
,,'"
"'~
o
ljZ
~~
~t5
8~
9'"
~/:
~ffi
~a.
~~
Ow
WI
~~
a5.....w
!Q~J
~~~
~o..a::
~~O
~~~
~~g
w8LL
2~~
o ~
8~w
...J~~
~~~
~
~'l!
xF
~~
o
NO
~~
~8
u.:a
wO
~~
~f5
@~
;'jZ
9ld
~~
E~
~~
a.O
~~
~~~
!!!~~
~g;~
o
~
~
z
w
o
1;
I
,.
'"
o
w
~
l?
~
~
~
z
o
~
~
[l
~
we;
~;?:
~W
"''''
~g
o ill
z'"
,,;
~
~
0,
5~
~tx
=>i!l
o~
wo
~z
:~
i~
~~
!!!8
i!:!!!
~~
w'"
"z
"'::;
~"
OW
~o
~'"
g~
~i
,.;
~
j:o
i
&
~
~
..
~
ffi
~
~
z
o
c:i ~
~ ~
g ~
~ ~
~ 0
~
!Ii
w
~ !!!~!cg
~ ffi,):~~~~~~
~ ~i~;~~~~
~~~8g! .;
~ !;28~~~~~~
~ Iw~d~c:n8rD
"'w"" 15~:w~:~S8
~i~~~o~~1..L
~ 8~!i(~g~.c.:.~<
z ~~ffi>:2~~~l)
~ a. .~ ~a:Z;:)V1J:
~ ~~E~3?~~~~
~~S~~!5vi~:
~ ~~~t5~~tJ~~
~ '!;2~:t: .rf3w
~m"z ~ w """"'wl:t:
... ~o~b~~o<(z
Vl~:~~~~i'~
i !!!~~I~1-8i=o
o ~~~~ji~~~;
~ ~~~~~~I~~
: 8~~~~~w~15
~ ~~9~~~~a~
-I
-I
I
g
~
a..
o~
U
L
8
i ~.
..... z~ ~
~ :n:~
~ :;~
~ :~~
~ ~ ~
~:3 ~
l?~ lCl
~~ ~
~
.~ ~
~~ a
8mMU
lii 0
~o!Si
~~ ~
tll ~ H ~
~ i i
i I ~ n
pi
i d ~
IU~~ .~
I
i
~Q~
~~~
w
~.
~~
,,0
W~o ~~
~ ?r~
:tc a..~
~ ~~
lri gj
ci
~
.;
\''?J..~1~
-'-~
s}#"--
~.
5 ~
(II is ~ ~~"
l5 '!i ~ ;
z ~ ; i~
:z ~ . ~~
~ 5=: b~::
~ ~ ~~ ~~
~GBEI
u
>~o
~~u
ii~
~~~
~2:l:g
'"
~~~~
u~ri's~~
f5-'8~~~
~ti ~~~2
3:~~~
--z--
~~@
~~~
~~~
g~~
'"
~
~ ~!]
ww
<'>z
~::>
w
* ~~~~~
~~
~!l~
\
\
,~~.~ :::0.-><
3V -- \ ~ ~:a ~
.'- /" .-.t' ,-,O~8
.<PY' '{1> '>'Smo
~ ~~ \ ~~:~ 2
~.. \\ ~o
. ''^
~
~
~
~
A';\
~
;~~i~~~ . ..-/'
~~i ~~ r/
25~:g~- ~
/( '1<:..
AiiI=l Oo~
_-~1'21:!l'l. 'cr, N~
~ ~ z_
~~,"I! .....
~\'-1iT ~:ri
"" z~
il~
~~~
i1;:l:O
0='8
l!lS
il~
~~~ ~
i1;:l:8 ~
~~~ 2
I
U
-
~
i
~
~~
~~
gig;
,_.
-
ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS
Mechanical specifications
Length 1840 mm 72.44 in
Width 154 mm 6.06 in
Depth 105 mm 4.13 in
4) Weight 5.897 kg 13 Ibs
Wind Area
Fore/Aft 0.283 m2 3.05 tt2
Side 0.195 m2 2.1 tt2
Rated Wind Velocity (Safety factor 2.0)
>237 kmlhr >148 mph
Wind load @ 100 mph (161 kmlhr)
Fore/Aft 460 N 103.4 Ibs
Side 372 N 83.5 Ibs
Antenna consisting of aluminum alloy with brass
feed lines covered by a UV safe fiberglass radome.
Mounting & Downtilting:
Wall mounted or pole tower mount with mounting
brackets.
Mounting bracket kit #26799997
Downtilt bracket kit #26799999
The downtilt bracket kit includes the mounting
bracket kit.
Electrical specifications
Frequency Range 1850-1990 MHz
Impedance 50n
3) Connector NE, E-DIN
1) VSWR ~1.4:1
Polarization Slant :t 45.
1) Isolation Between Ports < -30 dB
1) Gain 18dBi
2) Power Rating 250W
1) Half Power Angle
H-Plane 85.
E-Plane 5.
1) Electrical Downtilt 4.
1) Null Fill 5%
Lightning Protection Direct Ground
Patented Dipole Design: U.S. Patent No. 6,597,324 82
1) Typical Values
2) Power Rating limited by connector only.
3) NE indicates an elongated N Connector.
E-DIN indicates an elongated DIN Connector.
')The antenna weight listed above does not include the
bracket weight,
Impmemenls to mecllanlcal and/Dr electrical performance of lite
antenna IlIlIY be made w1l1lout noUce.
,."....
"..
BXA-185085/12CF
Radiation-pattern 1)
-110 -100 .90 -80 -70
-120____-----------~-60
-130///' . ~..,~50
"6(
-170
180
170
180
,
'50\
140"
130 ". //
120~~_':"""~_______________- 60
110 100 90 80 70
-140/
-150/
Horizontal
-110 -100 -90 -80 -70
_130-1:~~,:~ -50
;/ ,
-140/ ,,-40
"50/
.'60/
.170/
180 (
170\
180\
150\
140'
130 ~. /
120'......-_____. _____// 60
110 100--00-80 70
Vertical
40
When ordering, replace '_' with connectol type.
.'0
CF Denotes a Center-Fed
Connector.
10
~. ~._::.":;........ Amphe.nol Antel's
ExclUSive 3T (True
.' . Transmission Line
, ",:' Technology)
..,""" ,Antenna Design:
. Watercut brass feedline assembly for
consistent performance.
. Unique feed line design eliminates the
need for conventional solder joints in
the signal path.
. A non-collinear system with access to
every radiating element for broad
bandwidth and superior performance.
. Air as insulation for virtually no internal
signal loss.
Radiation patterns for all antennas
are measured with the antenna
mounted on a fiberglass pole.
1850-1990 lVIHz
This Amphenol Antel antenna is under a
five-year limited warranty for repair or
replacement,
Antenna available with center-fed
connector only.
----."'
~~;~~
Revision Date: 12/4/06
..,....",
Mounting on a metal pole will
typically improve the Front-to-
Back Ratio.
1300 Capital Drive
Fax. (815) 399-0156
Rockford, IL 61109 Toll-Free (888) 417-9562 Tel. (815) 399-0001
Email: antel@antelinc.com www.antelinc.com
I
.
REPLACEMENT LIGHT DETAILS /
CUT SHEET
,~ L/THDN/A L/GHT/NG~
-
FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS
INTENDED USE
For entrances, loading docks, walkways and vehicle ramps.
CONSTRUCTION
Rear housing is rugged, corrosion'resistan~ die-cast aluminum. Corrosion-resistant ex-
ternal hardware includes slotted hex-head and tamperproof fasteners,
ANISH
Dark Bronze (DDB) corrosion resistant polyester powder.
OPTICAL SYSTEM
Reflector is finished in white thermoset polyester powder, electrostatically applied, Front
housing and refractor are one-piece, injection-molded, UV-stabilized polycarbonate,
Standard finish on opaque portion of front cover and back housing is dark bronze poly-
ester enamel. Refractor is sealed and gasketed to inhibit the entrance of outside con-
taminants,
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
70.150W is high-reactance, high power factor. Encased-and-potted solid-state ignitors,
175W is constant-wattage autotransformer. Ballast is copper.wound and 100% factory-
tested. Meets ANSI standards and is UL listed, Electrical components are mounted on
back housing. (For 50 hertz availability, consult factory),
Porcelain, horizontally.oriented, medium-base 1150WI or mogul-base (175WI socket with
copper alloy, nickel-plated screw shell and center contact. UL listed (medium base 660W,
600V, mogul base 1500W, 600VI, Both are 4KV pulse-rated,
INSTALLATION
Top 3/4" threaded wiring access, Back access through removable 3/4" knockout. Feed-
thru wiring can be achieved by using a condulet tee. Mount on any flat, vertical surface,
USTING
UL listed suitable for wet locations, UL Listed to US and Canadian safety standards Isee
Options). NOM Certified (see Options), IP64 rated in accordance with IEC Standard 529,
NOTE: Not recommended for use in car wash interior applications.
Catalog Number
Notes
IType
Specifications
Height: 15.7/16" (39.2cm)
Width: 16-1/8" (41cm)
Depth: 7-3/4" (19.7cm)
Weight: 16 Ibs. (7 kg)
Wall Packs
TWP
METAL HALIDE
70VV, 100VV, 150VV, 175VV
8' to 15' Mounting
ORDERING INFORMATION
Example: lWP 175M 120 LPI
Choose the boldface catalog nomenclature that best suits your needs and write it on the appropriate
line. Order accessories as separate catalog numbers (shipped separately),
TWP
~
TWP
I vo,laoe 1
120
208'
240'
277
347
480'
TB'
TBV","
70M
100M'
150M','
175M
NOTES:
1 Not available 480V,
2 Not available in Canada.
3 Optional multi-tap ballast (120, 208, 240, 277V) In canada
120,277, 347V; ships as 120/347,
4 Not available with multi-tap ballast.
5 Lamp not included,
6 Quartz lamp wattage not to exceed ballast wattage rating.
7 Black finish on hou;;ing only,
8 May be ordered with SCWA,
9 GRSTD is available for select wattages; consult factory.
10 Optional5-tap ballast (120,208,40,2277,480VI.
11 Only available with 175M.
12 Not available with TBV.
Options
Shiooed installed in fixture
SF
DF
EC
QRS
CR
CRT
PE
LPI
l/LP
LS
FS
WG
SCWA
CSA
Single fuse (120, 277, 347V)'
Double fuse (208, 240, 480Vl'
Emergency circuit5"
Quartz restrike system"'"
Enhanced corrosion-resistance
Non-stick protective coating'
Photoelectric cell, button typeJA
Lamp included
Less Lamp
Lamp support (mogul socket only)
Full shield
Wireguard
Super CWA Pulse Start Ballast
Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian
Standards"
NOM Certified (Consult factory)
NOM
l__
'--'--l
Architectural colors (ootionaO
DBL Black
DMB Medium bronze
DWH White
DNA Natural aluminum
DSS Sandstone
Accessories
Order as separate catalog number.
RK1 PEB1 Photoelectric control kit (120V!
RK1 PEB1 CSA Photoelectric control kit (120V only)
RK1 PEB2 Photoelectric control kit (208,240,277V)
RK1 PEB3 CSA Photoelectric control kit (347V)
RK1 TWPFA FS Field installable full shield for cutoff
Outdoor and Special Environments
HID-240
Sheet #: lWPM _SE
TWP Metal Halide Wall Packs
Coefficient of Utilization
Initial Footcandles
TWP 70M
Test Report no. 97021601
TWP 175M Test Report no. 94121102
Coefficients of utilization
Coefficients of utilization
3
2
2
.E
0>
~
g>
.~
::>
o
E
'0
.~
c
::>
.s
'"
'-'
c
.;g
IF>
Ci
o
.E
,!?
'"
..c:
.f
::>
o
E
o
4
OJ
'-'
c:
.s
IF>
Ci
4
5
6
2
...
o
.~
c:
::l
2
3
2
3
4
5
6
Distance in units of mounting height
Distance in units of mounting height
70W, metal halide lamp, horizontal lamp ori-
entation, 10' mounting height, 5,200 rated
lumens. Total fixture efficiency: 50.7%
175W, metal halide lamp, horizontal lamp
orientation, 12' mounting height, 14,000
rated lumens. Total fixture efficiency: 53%
ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Line current Primary
Primary (amps) dropout Input Power Regulation
Wattage/ballast voltage start/ope rating voltage watts factor (%) Line V = Lamp lumens
120 1.20/1,15 75
100 XHP 208 0.70/0,60 130 130 90+ f5% = fl0%
240 0.61/0.55 150
277 0.55/0.45 165
347 0.46/0.38 235
120 1.1 0/1.80 70
175CWA 208 .64/1.10 115
Peak-lead 240 .55/.90 132 210 90+ fl0% = f7%
Autotransformer 277 .48/.78 150
480 ,22/.45 264
Tested to current IES and NEMA standards under stabilized laboratory conditions, Various operating factors can cause
differences between laboratory data and actual field measurements. Dimensions and specifications on this sheet are
based on the most current available data and are subject to change without notice.
Mounting Height Correction Factor
(Multiply the fc level by the correction tactorl
10' 12'
10ft, =1,44
15 ft, = ,64
20 ft, = .36
25 ft, = .23
15 ft, = ,44
20ft. = .25
25 ft, = .16
( Existing Mou~ting ~eight \2 = Correction Factor
\ New Mounting Height I
,~ L/THDN/A L/GH17NG@
Sheet #: TWPM_SE
@1989AcuityLighting Group, Inc., Rev, 4/06
lithonia Lighting
Outdoor Lighting
One Lithonia Way, Conyers, GA 30012-3957
Phone: 770-922-9000 Fax: 770-918-1209
www.lithonia.com
-
An~cuitvBrands Company
I"
"~ ... ... ...
~~lli ~ 0 a 0
'" ...J !E~~
J! ~~ ...J C~ -.. -..-..
~~ po .. .. .. V)
e Q:N :E w::> i Z
:)'" ~2 ~cl N
ON ~ 8~...8 ~ i
"- u
~ >-~ ~ ~~ io~~ ilil; I
, ~~ ~~ ~
~::;;
"':r: ~ W .~ I
I ~~ ~ ts I i
:E ~ ~III~~ a-N
Ii "- i i
~
~
....
a..
u ""
~ ~ U .... ~
~ i ~ U %
z: ~ ~
.... g 0 ....
z: .... ~ ~ lD
::J z: .... ~ ~
::J L5 ~ CII ~ I z:
!Z ~ ~ .... 0
~ ~ !li C) I i ~
"" .... z: % I ~
~ ~ i3 9 ! a.. % .... ~
u ~ d ~ It: ~ U ~ t::l :2
~ ~ :; ~ D.. z: ~ I!: ~
u If CII lD c;: ~ ~ ~
I 0 2 t i I ~ c
~D ~l ~ z
~ ~ LoJ
I C)
~ LoJ
-'
""'"
I D~ I ~ "- t i }o
10 \ ~
I
'" ./ .... ~
0 lil ..",
I I II
I
,
-..
1 i
i~ i ~
~ 8 ~
~w ~ u i
Q ~ ~ c;: %~o~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~~ !Z ~~~a.. ~ ~ . ~ ~o
i~51 I ~~~ 0 ~ ....~I!:~ ffi ~ ~ ~o ~ ~~ ~ ~;
~~i~~~!~~~~~~~ ~~~~ 9~~~~~~i~ = o~ ~g....~ n~~~~8~5~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~
~~iii~~~~~~~~a~f~~~~~~~~If~!~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~!~gj~~~~;~~i~~i~;~
3
a..
W
.... ~
z
::J ; ~
i 0 ~ i
~ u ::>
z
D..
5 ~ e ~o 0
t- _ ........ LA- Ul ~ L::i. (.):;) a.. f2 =- C 0
~z~~~~g8~~~~~~~Il~~If~~~~~~~~~~~CII~~~i~~~~~~~!~~~~gg~~~~~.~.~~
"If Jd d a:' 0 _
i ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ It: E
ItJ j r;! ~
a= C) ~ u
~ z ~ ""
Jd ~ 8 ~ ~ :2 <
~ ~ ~ 0 ~ g ~ ~
~C) ~~ ~~ ~~;ffi i ~ ~! iil ~ It:
~! 0~g~i ~~ $~I ~CII~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~I ~~ ~ E i ~2
~!I;;I;i~~~:!miil~~~llillilll~~I~S2~1~!;III;~I~~llilli~1;1~~!;~I~lf~il~ilii~1
~
Jd a.. ~ 0
~ X ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~
N ~~ ""8 u~!Z- · do ~ ~ It: ~ > 0 ~ ~ %
~~~~'~~~~~iSa8u~8d~~88~~~~~~~9~~....L5d~S~~~88~~~~~~C)~~g~~~~i~~~e~~~~~gi~~;~~~~5
~
!li
~
z
u
u
~B
!lit!
~i~
--1II--
-.;F"1:-
.."..fI,Y
P
....
~~
~i
....
B~
C111t:
<$~
....
u
m
~ It:
~ 15
It: Z
. U
....
u
ffi
~~
<8 B 0(])
l-
V)
:J
V)
-'
o
m
~
>-
V)
0lS
V)
z
o
i=
<(
:>
LoJ
a:::
tD
m
<(
S
It:
b
'"
~
~
fI""""',
"""
~
"
"~"
"~
\'i.
.\
.,~
"(t~~
"; //
\\ ,~,
\'1 1\:&
t,
~~.
'\;" .c?//~~
\1; /,/...., -; '\~
Q \\<i'fiI'J J \~
(~, \.:\....;:~~!? . \~."" '.,
\Xfi ".,_.,:,,~,~ ~ '<.>\ " \;~ \\
\\~ .,;." ' ': '. '. ~ \\;9..
/;;\::. \\.' \\~
(:~ \~
\~~'t
'.~
\\
" ~-~~.:'::.:<-" \\.
".::;;':/ ' """, \\
-::/ \'\) \.
.;:::;,>~<.. tl , ~:;'\~,~"
/) ~~~~~!
// r-c'"
('\ ii 6ffi!::::
c:~~{~'~~.:....:;;\.;~T'::,") a! i ~ ....
,'. ''1::,. ~od8
"-:~':::~F.'-' g c:! J; c:: 0
C-''''', f;:,,, is ~... ~
,,'" -\"'" 2> \',:J --1:>0'" ll!!
'"',\ ,Ci ',- 2: C; Z
,:.. \~, ,., :!i C ~
(\ .~ ),i ~~8i
\,.....':',~_._j' '" ....~~
.,>~,,~~~_.. ~ ~ : ~
~:;' d 0
~..::5~::::' :i!!~
.-:;;:~j>'"'' '.:\ ~ ~ ~
.. ?i~~
o I
I~
"'...
~i
:!iljl
~
d~
~j
r-9
~~
~o
"\ e:~
\\ , } ....
, >,....<,/,~;
\\~c::~?'/ ~ ~
!i 8:~
Ii _
\\.;::.:.::::.::'J ~. 0
:1'
,
~
~
d
~
z-
z-
. ..
;I
~
I"
.~
~
"::1-
CD
CD
~
~~~ I~ill iii~~~n ~i ~~8~~~6 iil~r~ pt~: z ~ I ri
a~ ~ Z a'" i I ~ c:
M~9 ~ Z 1!1 0", ill ~
~~~~~!t 0 i Q im z ~ ~
I. .l!. m .~~; 51 [ll ~
.~ o! ~.c CJl~'O CJl~~ ~o'l ~ z I
.' >' fT1~ ~ ..!C I i
~ ~ 0 ~~ ,~;o'" >'~ 0
~?~ .. t:~ ~ ~ '1) '1) e ~
i ....0 ~ '" '"
. ]0 ~..c N! ~ ~
~ ~ ....o~ r> ~ N ~ I a
~ ~lJlg ~ ~ !! ~
I Z
~ ~ > ~ z "" N VI
~ ~~ ~.!. . G) C !! ~
I~ .1 ~~'" ~:t !II ~~ 0 ~ ~ z '1)
........0 ""
UlUl ~~~ ~~ z ~
~~ "I "0
~~ ............ "" C
~'" fl VI ~
I", I", ..... ;;i UlUl'1) C
~:>o g;:>o ~~ "'''' . ~
~~ ..~ I I cI.~'1) Z
;~ "'~~ ""
, 1 I::l:t VI z ~ -u
........ ""
t:~ ~'" ......... VI
-., ~SlG ~
....
j1<
'1) n:lnz
'"
en I en ;
5 i
:~i I U "~~ilJ(ljln! ~~~~~~ ~~~i I ZO~
ill ill ill
I~~~~~e ~ i;~~~~ ZZ::I)>
~~ ~. ~i "'- ~. I ~~~ >~or oCJ~
C -< 52 .. :;501""1
~I'l ~ . ....gUj ." ~~F I~I~I~I~
~~VJ ~~ . ~ ~~~2~~
~~ ~ Q .... ~~~o
....
.... ~
.... 10 CD CD
10 ....... ....... .......
C 0 ~ lS ~
~z ~ ~ mO';tJ
0 i~ll~ I ~ ....... ....... ....... I ~ Oz ~
~.... o 0 C>
.... .... .... ~~"
~!il 9!iiil!li ! !&UI!I~ ~~~
x: 5t~~ !!~ m~~mi ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ O~n
~I ~~ ~~"'r-~ ~ ~
li~ ....- FG10
-00
:>0 ~~ ~ ~~~ I I :>0 S ir-
OUl~ ~~ ; Z
~I . . ISo p 3~~EZ CJ n - B mm"
:l!Z 8 ~ ...~ :c~ ~ . ~f)~^
~i >' "';;1 ~ ~g~ r >: 0 8 z
I::l ~5i a ... ... ...
?Do " :< :< ~~~~..
~ ..-4 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~
z z z
~ c; IE IE ~e5 I
c mCJ~O
~ ~ !!l ~
> 0 0 o n 0 0 0 0 .... ....~
I I I I I I I I I I I ~m~z
- Ul ... ~ ~ .... c;; ;;: - .... - 0
000 w -
00 2 ~ ~ I g ~ ~ 2 00 " ~I CZ" r
~r-~~ ~i~~~~ 9i00
:>oa;ln il5 ~ om r
~ ~ ~ ;~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~"T1r
m rn
; ~~ ~ ~; I ~ z
~~ ~ ~ -i
~ <n ~
I I I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~
=1
~
; ; ~I. UIII~ i~ ." ~ --I
~ I ::I ~ ~
~ g! 000
~ -i 1i~11 I~;; It.>
;::~
R 0
Z;u
~ ~ D>
I - D
r') ~ i a o~ 8 <-< !
=- ff.t ~ )>8 .
= - I 0 ~m ~o ~ ~c ~
~ .. C i:J ",;0 _
1:1 ~~~ 111~~ ~. F ~4 I3t
.... ~ ~ g ~
> ';:i~~ (Ii
.... .... ....
z--
. ~
00 :z
..."" ~;e
N"'i"'Nn:>o'
~!l;1 CI-<~
~i"; ~r-;;o
~elN;g~n
~~~Pl'
Ul
~@
N~8-C>
~"'8~~
~i";8~
~elgj;g ~
~~
lSZ
loa>
~~
~
00
...""
~~Iii i
8i"; 'r-
'" '" r-
~1Il"'C> n
~~
-Z
pl", gt \\
....01 of.. '
~... .. .\\y'
-z ) ~ ~
~ ~--
!/
;:;
00-
.....m Of2
-c... :L:~
, N"'O"'~:S
/ ~~8~r-o
8i";88~c...~
~'" C>;e;;o
{ri~_ ,."r-
8~~Pl'
;;0
:::l
~~@~
~:"8l::"~
8 ~ 8~ ~
~~",;g ~
,..,-_ ::0
U)Ocn ~
0_
:c::
r-,t \\,/
9.t~'
*:,y--
;.~~
/'
.
c:I
~ /
/-
~
.....-;:1-,;
/If,t.\f>t
~".
-~..'O\\
~p.
..,
~~~ tf
N:"~",~
OmOc.....
8 ~ ~~ ~
~~~;g~
f"Y1-...... ::::0
tnOcn-l
0_
:c::
-~
~
,/
oI'<i0 ~
~~
. .\ ~.
",~;g::: ~ ~<" ~~
I~~~;: \:\y _//\ r-"~ ~
~~~;g ~~ .&C ,.,
1Il ~ ~ :u P , .~c;.
!'- '~
\
\
\
~~:i!
..,!;!lii
!ilS!'"
G1lil~
~ilii
lila~
il/l;6
~~~
~o
em
2Z
~~
8~:i!
~~lii
i~m
50lil
z>~
I~i
....~;;l
, ii
o~
\
\
\
~~~~~ - lD !>> ;-J !" !" ~ !" !" -
- p
en
n "c! 'tI ~~~z~l;a~~ X ~~ z ~I: ~~ ~~x ~I:.... ;:O'tl ~:;x 'tI'tIs'tl.... c:
ii c: g:~liliDSl 0 1Tl~6 1Tl;:o !il~~!il~
on~g 1Tlc!ITl-iXO ITl ~a! ~~iii 00 ~::liii ::0
0..e:1Tl ~1:~!ilzi5~a ~'tI :e gill ITlIllO O'tl d Zdg
-N - ~ 1Tl" 0 iT! ~ ~g ;;C ~Z!!! ....~o €l!il ~IO ~~;;~~ <
~~ r- '" I: z-;;,;g~~fTlzlTl~ I: 1Tl~ n~ iT! 51 !"0iT! ;0 N '~ ;-J8~ 1"'1
xx J;i..., ~....Dl 0 -0 000 ~
z a~lA~~~~zx 0 ~- o III IIlC Z I: z a~~a:!:
l"~~> z . ;:0 o~ ...-
;~ ::IDlo 0 ~ o~ 0 ITlO -~ i!J81Tl iii "'Z ~~~ ~~ Z
&.. lD o - 'tI -i)>1Il -i ~ OC o'tl ...."
Z '" " 0 oaax~:!:x iii ~~ ~ c;o Zo ~~ olAO III 0
~~ r- oo 00 zO fllTl C ~! ~Iil~~~
..t:~"" "(11 Fi XZ ITl:!lZITl III ~ >1Tl o ~ lD -f
........ 0l0!" 1Tl~~Z ~ g: ~~c lD 1Tl0 .... ~ ~1Il OzlTl c.. ~1Tl'~0 1"'1
ITl '1Tl Od zo;O ITl ~;g 00 ;:0
I I ~:5i cD!>>~ :I: z z ~d ,,-i~ 0 1Tl1ll;-J1Tl~ en
a> 01 . ITl z> o~ ~....O~ 0 0 ~ Z;o OiE~ -i
. . ~~z 5 ~;oITl-i'< ITl :I: ITl ITlM Zo z::I
1Tl~:I:o :I:~~" ~ iii-i :::1 'tIlD d O'tl
" " :!i 0 :I: ~ ~1Tl ;o'tl_ ~~ ~....~~~
N- ":e n lTl-rn OZIIl-i .... Siii o!:(~
IIlZ ~x:i!!oO:I: " lD ~ flllA ;IE
&& ITl 0 ~6 ~~iii
0 -i-i' ITlITlNa~1Tl C ITl 1:", 0 ~~~~?;;
q iT!!ilI::i!!:I:~-iiT!;g iii -i Z 'tiC Z z~ 0
<:> E ~~ ! ~:~ ~ :!:~
~~Z~~~~Y'~ ;0 :::1 0 c-i opoo~
I cl'; 0 ITl ITl I:ITl ~:I:
:I: ~ N 1Tl-0 III r- IDO ITl " ~~g~~
B B G c Z Z 1Tl- :I:1Tl I: 0;0
z,.- zo o~Cl~o'<;o~1Il III ~iii 'tI ;oZ 1Tl0 ITl ITl
:: SID liiti ~ ~ 1'1..., .... . ...z~>. a 'tI ~ !il Z -ij:t
III ~ :I: ~~ (1I-i -00 iil OlDZg~
a ~~ ~~ ~ r;;lj;~C;IU!: III >~~~r1o-i:r-i ~ d _:I: ~z ~iIl 000
..., - 0 -i)>0 Z P ;:0 olTl 'tI-i ~ ~c"'~
~~ d~ O~x~-i:e ITl 01Tl ~;"1 Z z:e I:
~z "" ~~ ~ I: 1Tl:I: ~~
~~ ~c~:~rT1;ux~ 0 -i0 ITl 0:- ;o1Tl 0 Y'~ITlY'>
,.,Z ~ !::~~~'"~ ~ ~;f~~!l=!iI~ ~ Z Oc 0 0;0 ~i!J C-i Z fllzd
" ~ ffl8~1:~!;lITl~ "', ;0
'! ::I -i lD'tI ~ ....1: Cl ~o
N e~ ~ t;8888 ,.- ::a~8~~ ~ ,ze..._ f"10 0 :I: "'0 00' =eo fllllofl'tl
& ~ ~ lil.....8 ~ f118lD Z iii ITlz ON ~g il 0:::1 ~~~g
Z -l ~" :I:
~ ,..., ..., ~ !;l~ n 1Tl-i
> ~~O~€lf;l III 0- oM :!lel~
0_ ~ C p~ ;0% :::1
~~ Z-l oZlTl-z .... ~ 0 ;l1Tl '" 0 0;:0 MZ:I:
0:I: - ofi 0 ITl :ec Z
p Z Z o . I:ITl ;Eo;;n
~ 1Tle: fi iii 1Il-i0 :::1><" F~ VI 1I'tl
~ ~ ~'-" fTll; ~ 1Tl!il 0 .... ~~ ~~ ?;;;;JlDlIl
"!. ::!l ~ 0
,..., ~ 1"1 ;o~~o :j iii ;I: zO .... o!j;!c
~ 0 01Tl ~o~
:::10 Ciii :!l .... ~ ~
o >~ ITl ;0 ~ -i~ .:I:~
'" ~;o 0 0 ITl
r::l 1Tl.... I: 0 ID-i ITl
", ITlITl 0
I I · qUI ~ i~ " ~ I
~ I 3: ~ ~ ;0
~! nO;
~ V) i!~li~ ~ O~ :I:",
n !::-
~ 0
I~' ~i!!l Z;o
...~~ 0>
. 0
I ~o ; ~ ~ oS ~ <-< ~.
~ >0
",0
- I g ~m ~O :J: ",e (I
",::0 if
'" ~ . €J - "'-;
.. . . F '"
........ .... ~ ~.
~ ~ g !ll~ CIj
'Cl~~ ~
... ... ...
0;- ----~~--~---
10 --
- _-3:---------------
'"
~
I
i
tI ,."",,",
..!! ",,,, .:I
e :>'"
"i 0'" O~
u...: -
>-> ::L
J ~~ g ~g
~:::;
i ~~ ~ ~5
Q. I:
~
i ~
1 I ~
~ u ... !1!
~ g.~ i ~ ~
~ ~t~ N ~ ~
'" ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ;..~. bl ~L.l~ ~
~ i :; i ~ u ~~ ~
6 I i~ t ~ ~ ~ mi!! ~ ~
t3 ~ ~b! ~ t! I!! ~ .~ I ~
::> i2 ~ !:::!!i!1i! ~;., ~~ '" ~
0:: ~ ~i. ~~ ~ . z ~o ~ ;i
I- ~ ~ bl C> ~ ~ ~o-:o; ..
Vl z zo- ~~ ~ .... ~~ ~ ffi
Z z i!: I!! zt::: ~ 5
S8 B8 GBBEJB
L.l
u
~
~
~
C>
i
~
Vl ~
~ ~
o -
~ ~
o It:
!=: ~
....I a
o It:
~0
~
liJ b 18 .
::E: GO ;.r, 'b" .. ..
To! 18 ... ... '" 0 ",. .
;f ..........~lD
~ ...J Qj
~~I~~~~~iiJi2liil
~...1o.iD.. ~~~
!i ~:::II!!:e~lfa~~biD...,
::) u ............:::::::e
8
~
t::J
=
~
.:::.
2 It:
~~
~~
~i
_---- J~U
- -
/' -
/' -
/'
.........
........
'-
-'''J
-- '\!
~ i~
. '\
I \
I
I
I
:::E
ffi~
~-
~~...J ~-
tQg~ ~t
xGj-
---~-" ~ ~
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
i ~
I
I
/~
061
~
CD
<0
'"
~
-~-~-
I \ ZZ
_ __ __ _, I \ ,--_ - 0
I \ ~~
-\-J ,____.J-\, <( -------- ---- -
_ -----L2-J.- ---- ~----- ---- ~ ----
\1 \I (DO
_ __ __ _----- _- _- _-.J' " \ L - ~ ",-"
" l'i \ - -- -- -=--'" -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1 '" \
I ~ \
/ \
/ ~ \
~
--
~
OR'< BR\OGE ROAO
@
~~~
z ~
w
<(
-
I
iU
i
~ 15
~ i
i ~
s ~
5 I
~... ~
~
i ~!
~ l~
... ~~
!~ Ii
<8
ii
i~ .
~ii
:~~
i~t3
!Zoln
~o-~
lil~~
~~8
ai;c I It:
~ !f.l
In
Iii
I i2
~~i
~
~
<>
"bo
_N
. .
s___
I I
~~
~~
xx
......-
N-
~~
>-
W
>
0::
:::::>
V)
w
l-
V)
Cl
w
C>
0::
<(
~
Z
w
~~i
~L5~..;
c>~S~
~~5~
9:J: 18112
C>2:J:
lS~'::l~
Sj!:C5d
-~d~
m~cs:;c
~U::>~
Ino~a::
a::~~~
....!!il:l""l
j!:xlX>!!!
........ '"
~~.,;~
~,..,~ln2
~!~:g
l5~;~~
I~O"'U
l5~l5!i
5.... Iii:
....~~~i5
j!:ir~~1
~ U
~~~~
(f) ~5!~1n
~ ~~g~~
o oog:R
z ~~~~~
~ lf~u.!-B
(f) ~
.--------
~
....
j!: ci
ilS5
....0
....~a:;
~l1.!f;!
a::t;;c>
8~a:;
~""I
zj!:
~~~
~I~
ltl~....
~g;
'''is....
Inu~
~~B
...d:;its
~~~
g~lt
....zS
i50""
2~fd
~~O
::$0
~~~
z~~
olSn
i!j ::>
ffi~~
;;iSu
N
9
--
e
'i
,
S
13..;
""
oU
~8
~~
! !!
~ ~~
::l ttl
li is'''
~ g8
is ~~
~ 8l1.
~ liil;l
~ S .
ia ma::
o ~~
l5 i~
~ ~~
~ ~~
lIi ~~
~ ~l1.
,,) .t
N
....N
a::N
=>'"
ON
u<(
>->
o _
<(0
a::z
o
~~
"':1:
IOU
~ir
<
~
~
~
~
....'"
j!:o
!!!i
~i
122 ~ ci
_:of a:; 15
ga:; ~~
~o ze:
81 58
.... ::>....
l5ffi e:j!:
:gl1. l'!
~ltl 8lii
g::::l oS
-~ ~&!
CU1 I-C::
~15 ~8
~. ~ltl
::I;;i ",Ii;
~. 255
...~ ....In
~z~ als
v, !i \Q 5
~~ ~~
!!!j!: ",In
Q:~ ;~
~15~ I~~
!!!i5 lIi
~~ !i
~~~ ;~
...
o
is
~
.;.J
l5
f{l
8
~
....
o
tt!
o
~
~
Ii>
~
;;i
i
s
~
...
o
~
:J:
'"
€.
i 2
~
~ 0
~ ~
u ~
a::
u
8
~
li
.n cd
....
u
~
l5
u
~
a:;
S
~
l1.
~
U
~
....
IX>
!i
~
~
....
~ ~ -:
b li~ ....
z is..\: '"
~8 ~
>=~ a::
g~ :
><..... 2
N~ ~
-0 >=
15 ttl i5
z'" z
~
:~
a::U
~~
;;i~
...:
i
~
::I
I
~
~
$
0..
o~
~2
~g
I:
~
~
ia
S
i
s ~ ~ ~
~ 5 ~
l!; 52 cs
~.. ~~ ~
26 li3 IS
81:; b~ ~
;;;~ ~8 '"
~~ ~!2 ~
liz lij' li
%0 %U %
:;3~ :;3.... :;3
~f;j ~~ ~
;l;l ;l;l ;
,
,
,
,
/
//----------/
,/
_/
/
,/
,/
/'
,/
/
,/
...,;,-
/
,/
,/
/
-"'.....
...__________ 6 91 -----------/-
///
/1/'/
//
/'
/'
/'
/'
/
<=}\)-'--
/-G
_......-
---,-
---
~
~
-------
---
....---
---------...--
-------------------------
b
It'l
/
/
,/
/-
/
.."'.....
/'
,/
/
/
~ "
6931'\ ---t----- ------ -'
:::!irU -------------------------------
.----- -------------- - --.....,
"
"
,
,
____L____________. '
I . l
I I C---
I
I
I
..-
..-
..-
..-
..-
..-
..-
/
/
/
/
/
)j
/
/
/
/
/
/
:\'
//roOJ
,,'/'
,r-
-.J
roC?
/'0'//
,/
,,-,,,
:'
,
,
,
---
,O!;
//'P
o(
/roOJ
"I'
"""
,;' ---
__-1?--
,/ \
~@.~~
lit (; Sl ~
a..................
.. .. ..
.~ ~ ~lli
~~::> ..
8~fW)8 ~ II
~!5~i )1;ll
&l~ ~ iuh
~
~
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
//
/,'1
//
:'
,'/
/
~
~
~
d
a::
~
z
m
:J:
'"
"II
~
I
~
o
%
~
ffi.,;
Q!I
10
8
I~
C>~
i5ttl
z'"
..:
...I
@]
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
//
,
,
,
/
i
~
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
..
I
,,/
2
,i" ~
//,/'
/
1//
/,/
,/'/
I
i
~~
16~
N
I
U
~
i
c>
i
I
\5
!i
i
e"
Z
~
:I:
e"
::J
~
~
....
~
~
....
~
o
~
::l
~
0..
o
~
~
....
u
z
o
5
::I
~
~
I.&J
~ e
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
/'//
i/'/'
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
/,/
/'
,/
,/
/
"..'
~
~
i5
~
ltl
~
~
....
::I.
....19
Be:
!?
~.
i~
~I
~l5
\51
i~
'in
o
_ 'b
It'l-
U H
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
//
/
(\'
/J%'
/
I I
og
~l1.
~t;:
xx
. .
...-
N~
~~
,
,
//i//I/
/"
,/
,/
/
".......
,/
,/
/
/
/
,
,
,
,
,
,
..".....'
,/
/'
/
/
..,.....
,/
/'
,/
.....---
,
,
I
,
:
I
,
I
I
,
/
------------------//
/
/'
/'
/
- . - , - , -::-~--=-<,j/
Y; -------
........-
"
/
// lS:ttl
, :'e:
~~
~i5 --
~~ /..../....
B .... ".--",
_-~-7"-
---- //
~'
.(';
c
:z
~
CL
LaJ
~
Vi
Q
LaJ
C)
IX
~
:z
LaJ
/
--'
----------------"
.......------
~c
"
)
- ~---
al~D 31V15
.
~ >( ~\R1~ \ \ ~ ;\' rI',~~'V'r,+=:1/ ,- ,-------.....~"'\ /~:.,(?~
I'T1 :n I . I /~I'--.J //1:;i -.:. riA ~~((
~ ) ~) '/, ~', / / ~ c-;;::; ~ ~ ~ --z.J ~ ~ )0
...r--'<:: '/0>1 ~ ~ \,t ... If'-J ."t.,J ifL ~ -=~
~ \ '. I ~~ ( ~. I) \ ,.,.~~:.,\",--- ~ "v \( ~ ~
1 X 1_ '., --./ ~ ~ V ,\\...
D~I ~ (J1 ~ '--', ~~?\ tj T~\: -- "'~"
~I 'J~. \J' -r """3: 1 ~\--..-----.I.r----...~~
11 I \ \ ( .:M ~ -....:--..~ ,l.--,l:i:h- 'l'-.--' ~ :J.....
/( A /1 ~\ ~ /' ""l ~~) I "F'" _\ / _ "'-
r/ ~ _ ~ 'I \ n '-..; '" :::::: Cl X- '........... ~" ~:::;- "0
\ )', - ,," V fJfL/ ~ "[\1 ~ ~ ~ ~
\\ ',~ ~ ~ "(1 :~~" lJ ~~~~\~ ~~ "'~
/
~ "~~ ~u ~ H 1 ~/
%'pjll" ) ~ ~( ~ )~tJ ( ~~(\ ~~ CI ~~ ~I~;
)~~ 1\') ,~, ".\W><~:/ n'~~\Jj'/~"
j, II / I V \\\ 1\ [..J Vj'/! ~i<r,
-' ~,( ~ Ii/V, II (\ ,): ~ ~ ~<t'-"
7!J. " .~ ': \ ~ - - '\~ ." ~~ ~1r?jZ:~
~~~ I r ~ /~ ,'- ~ ]\') '. \~ {? ~ X I II'
~j~ (\Jl ~ 1..~' \\ ;;r., ?0 \
\1'\ ) ~ ~ tl "\0 " ~~ <vA
'1'-,& .~ ~ ~ 1\ ",I '~ p.n if..
\ I i \ (~/ ~ I ' N' . /) ,'-
,) I' ~ ( fTlL(~ \ ' 0 .~~ ~ : c
)~, ~ ~"'-:\J /? "1n m
) ( ., .... ~ ",,- /--"':~ ~ ~ 1 '" -1-, ..p
I I ::::! 0 \', ~ ~::E _ ~r----;" , ----:~ ~_ '~tj?/
~~, I\r.;~: ,~M \ ,....-- \K V'J ~ b
en 1\' '-J ,) -=- ~ "" fTl
~ ~ \\ ~ ~ "rt( i------ ~ I ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ '/.. ( '\\'It' /' "
~~ d5 ~ \ /; I ~ , ~ 00 if "' " I · ~ / ~~
-- .vU)~ ~ ~\ ' ~~ ~,O I ~~~~
~~ "'~\l :'\'\1"'" ,~~ A # i, "", ~ I D~
.'; --., ~ \ \ \\\ \ IIY"": -,.;;~ ,ItS e JJ. - ~ II ~ \ \j! _~
\ ~ \\\~ A'\ \ / .)] \ Yi7/! (I~;\\ ~
II Y~y { \J I ,~1 'j jl)1 'i ~~ ~,i-Z .f
~ I ~ ,!~ Ql ~ (( (\ ~ f I"~JJU
c..! '1~ n ~ y\i~~rpl ~
, l"'"l\.~~ 1/ j? ,) 'I "'-.::
~ W; ~ \ )j; 1/ \ \' J ::
A '2!1~, \\\\ ~ ,^'f /\']-I-~ M.r
BB BS
FJ5 ,.., z 1"'1
~ ~ !;2Z>" .. r<'> Vl
~ 8 )>S~ 0
--. ::lee ~(.,.I"'"
~ ; ~~~ ;m....
o ~ '... ,. ~"'~
:E c ahlVl oo~'"
~ (/) ~0l0l ~~:u
C .... OVlO CoOO
~ ~ mD?-. "-J
- 3:: OlJ1
~ 00'"
"0 rf') ~~
. 0 'I ~
....
.... :EZ
o
:E
'"
::0
~
~ .......
i i j'i unl~ i~ "'tJ ; ~O~O ~l '-1 !!! ~
n~ I ~ ~ dll f
~! 000
I II ~ O~ ~ ~z~ :I: VI
~ 3::-
iq i ~m!!l R o "" ---l 0
I z ~9:-o ~ 5~
)> -0 = .0
.- ~ ~ =- ,~ 0 <-< !
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w ~~ '" )>0 li~m f.
~O ",0 ~.
OJ J: ~ '\l 0 ~ ~~ fit
~mm ~I ~. ~ F ~~ ~ ~ i! ~~ if ~ ~~
~~~ ~ 8 !ll~ ~. r- <<It I ~- i.
t"rr VIN.\Q ;;:;0 ,:::
en
z
o
~
o
L;:
(j
w
CL
en
C)
z
o
w
w
en
I-
Z
W
Z
<C(
~
IX
W
CL
~1-1
~5~
Clll..o<'l
~o!11ii
OJ; -
I-",~-'
tJ'~a-;O
~;!J;lll~
::::;~:;:)lj
UloJ i=
ZtiWVl
00!::it:
Vlj!!
8~uu
~z8i
VlOll..U
~~:I-
$VlO~
f5~l-ll..
....-OloJ
~~j!!!!.!
1-i?~5 .
~ ~o~~~
i= ll..~liix-
o l:>w~!.!~
~ VI x-
W z:;:)loJ"'o
en ~O~III~
I- ~~~~~
Z 1ll~0.:1'):2
j .o~~~
CL _Vl:2<o.:
ai
]
e
'i
,
I
~
J:
~
8
Lfi
D-
o~
~~
1:
.... .... ....
~~~?
a..................
.. .. ..
,~ ~ ~~l
~~ a ~
~~li!O ~ !:'
i~~i ~Iri
Cl~ ~ iUU
loJ
Z
~
VI
1,t.1
::Ii
::::;
loJ
~
Cl
~
:;:)
~
:;:)
U
it:
~
o
loJ
N
it:
~
:;:)
ll..
loJ
0.:
~.
VI"'":'
~t
1-.
....g
zg
30
ll..,
~~
~o
ue
ci
loJ
VI
:;:)
...
III
~ ~
it: ~
~~
~t: 9
:;:)
~d ~
~VI VI
~8 ~
z_ 0
~"':- Iii
VI loJ
....~ ~
z 5: 0'"
0.....
(5 loJ loJ
~~ ~
~ ~ Cl
x:2 -'
~: ~
;( 9 ~
It ~ :;:)
< Cl ~
~~ ~
!Z 5 ~
0:;:)
s~ ~
ii:~ Z
Iw
:J
Ii
~
0.:
o
o
-
I
o
....
I
o
d
VI
o
g~
'0
iii,
~o
....
1')1
....0
.....-
I-
Z
~
:;:)
o
loJ
0.:
o
o
-
I
o
....
I
II)
loJ
0.:
~
'- .
ui""":'
~t
gg
o
-g
o
~,
z'
o~
VII')
0....
~;
VlZ
VI!!:!
~5
ClZ
o
...loJ
o VI...
VI :;:)0
~~~
0.: 0
:;:) ~i=
0:20.:
VI 0
~~:S
~~lf
loJll..o
o.:o~
;l:~
o VI VI
-' I-
VI~~
Cl ;i,0
3::;:)~
00
30.:loJ
UloJ~
3:!;(iil
vi"'loJ
~<~
3~~
:;:)o.:ll..
:21i:.~
0.: OVl
f?loJ
o.:~~ '
loJ Ii VI
NloJ~!Z
::::;o.:xloJ
~!!:.I-~
lizo:;:)
loJloJZ
0.: 8QI-
loJ~E;~
~_o.:::'
OZll..ll..
z
o
9
ll..
:2
o
Uori
z"?
01')
ll..
:;:)u
~~
~:
o
~ci
~Iii
0<5
loJZ
oj;
-'~
ii
~~
1-0.:
~Ii
:2loJ
Clo.:
Z
oz
t::lQ
Iii
% 0.:0
loJloJ
ll..l;j
~l:>
I
i
..J
o
oa:: ~
~!Z~O
OCl)~
zO..Jo
QJ-<C-
(1)zt:;!:!:
owoo
a::::E w
w- 0....
fD CI)
CI)
CI)
I
o
2
i
N
I-N
a::N
JI')
ON
u<(
>->
o _
~~
o
~::;
"":I:
lOU
-;2
~
Iii
-'
~
<
z
~
m
o
o
I- .
o
~loJ
m:J
_ll..
l:l~
o
ll..loJ
m
I-
~;j
VI'"
-I!!
!::Z
loJloJ
0.::2
loJo
XZ
",loJ
VI~
Z-'
0-
i=0
_VI
o
ZCl
OZ
Uj:
~~
~f?
ZloJ
:;:)x
I-
0:
loJ .
~~
:;:)1-
~I
0...
,0
OloJ
....0:
IU
II)~
loJ'
0: VI
~~
"':-8
VlO
~-
loJ
0.:
u.
<"'":'
"':-t
VI
m'
-,0
VI
8g
~o
,
lti~
:21')
:;:)....
Cl .....
~I!!
oz
~~
VI!:;
l;jz
~!Z
~~
loJ:;:)
~o
:2loJ
o .
e~ci
ooOloJ
~x~
Z
o .loJ
om
VlloJ
o~~
~Ii
VlloJl-
o:z
~1l..1I.!
~!!!~
Cl~:;:)
~t8
N
0)'
O'l~
....0
o
WwCD
IIO
l-l-Z
<(
OI.L.I
I-O..J
wzO
000::
<(-I-
~~6
w~u
o::!:!:
<(Uo
wz
UlQ..<(
W(/)
U Z
ZOO
wz-
o::<((/)
W 0
I.L.(/)o::
WOW
0::0:::<(
<(-
~. ::lO~
I- <( Z e"
o <( 0::
z'-:~5
~ VI
~ ~o: ~ to z
VI 0 I
I- .. U'if? .loJ E. III: 0 g
:2~VI loJ 01- g~ ~ 0
o z -' VI VI ~~ ox - 0
e: 01- ~ ZU I I 1/'1
!f.! loJx 0-' ~~
ll..i=~ frl!Z <oloJ loJ 00 u:;:) ~ ~ 0
VI I!! 0 Z Oll.. CD
:I: loJ Zo Cl~~ 0 00.: :2 <
g t;zt;Q. m VI::Iiw;!J;OloJ I- -0 j!!... ii2
i=l;jUloJ I- VI "'''' '-u iii!!!:
-",~~:2;!J; loJ 0:0:... 'Z loJ
VI ~~j!!~ ~~ 2 UUo: ~;:; 0:;:) ~'ln
VI loJ -'loJ:2 ::i <<CU ~~
loJ Oll..iiiz :21- ~~......mm -,0:0:<C .m . 2% '"
U UIII...O I!!~ 000.: 0 ~
~ <C ~~ei ~~~ 1--
j!!IOz ~~ ~~ZI-j!!o :::!), j~
loJVI~~:50 0: II.. g~
iii~zO :;:) VIVI oXiii III ~
Z 0. '01= Q.!!! 3:loJ~U I- ~ZZ% -III VI 1I..::l ~ III
01')1=~ :;:)000 c!,0:0 loJVI CD ...~
0 -I ~~~~ ~~:JloJ::lo~ U 1-1-.... ....loJQ. ~~ I ~<C ~
0 'Z loJI-'Q.~j:loJ ~OI)N_ OC) C)
~ 0: ~!~~ ~O ~!:::9tt:::!~~ VI I NIL. - S~ 0 w ~
!Z U~ <C( I-loJ <C 0:J- ~Cl ", )(> 2
0 0 ~ "loJ_OloJ I Zl- -i=-I ,,; ",... C) 2~
U ~!;(~~ 0.:< o~~IiiVlm~ ~iii ... 1L.000o ~;!J; IIIw ; -' -' %
~ :;:)Q. 1-0 :;:)loJ),i= - "'>- 0 OIiVl 0 >-u o. . .
i Vlj!:iiifh 11I10.1 OVlCl"'X~~ ", !!!:~ 0:10.1 ~ III:Z 1/'1::>> :;:) :2
0 0.: loJOloJ loJW <cw '-z Z 0:
W loJloJzo -,Q. j!!1-3:01- ::l ", ::>>0: o.:~~ 011I 0:0: ~~ ~ W
CL VI XI-WI 00 g~~I-~~Q. 00 ~ Z-' CD 2~ IL. C
10.1 1-08z Vlw wll.. '-loJlL. :;:):;i <C(
en frl. z - ~:2::l~~~9t W 0:2 2w
o 10.1 wm .zO I-
..J ~::::;~ WIL. wO:
z~ I- !:;o.: Z ~o ClW ~o
C) ~. 0 o 10.1 8;!J;f?!.!>-:I-'S CD zl- I-:ll:
Z ...J~ ~Y~:2 - loJ o:l::~ClI- <C( 20.: o '0 :2~ ~S:!
o~ Z If;;:j!::1!! .... ZVl loJ ':;:)- 3:VI .... ::if? U ol!!z VlCl m::>> 1/'1 0
<C(o m~uou"'~ ~ "'z- !h <cO 01) -
W VlO 0 o..;"'z IX z3lO oo8loJloJ9Cl VI !fl~. 1-" III ",
W ;!J;~ i= O:ool;j <C( 00 -'loJ mQ.-,:;:) 0 IX Slf II.. w ai ri
5l;j~~~f?; w ~ '" ~ ci
en <5 0 Q.~ww CL -0: .c w o!:;~ loJlII U ... ::>>
>- 3:~ 9t Vlo.: w ~Cl fG N U
~ :;:)0. X . > loJZ III 0 <C
IX 0:0 C) VI>-!Z j!!~i ::::; ::::; .... ~~ <C I
IX i:l~ I!!fwu CL ~~ W Q.!ZQ. C) I
W ~_1II1 ~ z~loJ!:::iiil- ~~~~ i= z CD
<C( VI ~ en o i!' Cl U ~~~ ~ -
~ ~~ "?~~~ CO ~ I=~ w~ ,z %-'NN 0.: IX oll.. ..:
0.1') , W ~~ ::::; ol( Vlo.: 00 :;:) W loJ<!:loJ 0.0 ai ~
l- I') a;:2:;:)o~loJ;i, W , , 0 ~ IL.
CL 0.: " Z b!1xloJO: m",1/'I III ~5~ j3Cl w ....
C 0- iclj!!~~~~o IL. III ... 2
~ O~ j ~ U-'loJ ..... u:2 loJo I-Z
W it:~ w~i~~ ..... 0: 0: loJ:2ClloJ it:
CL en ~~ . ~OX~loJloJloJ 0.:1- .:;:)
I- 0.0 VII-' I-' - IL. 0. I-o.:z N VlO3: ....0
ci
~~ l!::
ZQ.
:;:)
~ ~~
~ 1-0
10.1 frl~
Z VlU . ..J
::::; 0 .... o.:Cl
....0 oloJ ;c
0. x.
it: :>NION3.:l NOllon~lSNOO I- 8~ W
I- ~
~ Al.11181SI/1 H:>IH .O-,V ....< ~~
-' C
-I 1- !;( o.z Z
loJ'"
0 mo 0
z -,ill ti
:;:)
0 ~~
0.:
Cl ~~ .....
~ J-
3: ~g O~
~ zfrl o=:~
loJQ. 0....11I
:2 IL.VI
0: Zlll .....~
c;: OVl .....
~ 5~ 0=:5
loJZ J-z
~ 1-:;:)
0
o.:loJ
VI Q.Z
~~ ~loJ~ ...,
~ I
00.: 0~Q: U
ZO Z 0
:2
0:0:
f?f?
3:weim
VI~ll..l
~~~P1
!:: ..,
~w~o
8c!.~~
"""'<
~";loJc!.
VlO~1')
~~o..;
Qo~~
~ I -'
>....w~
0.:~~1-
f? '...J~
U<loJ
VI I 0.: X
~~~u
:;:)..;loJ
I- Cl,
~Vl0:8
:2~0!!.!
Cl~IL.Q:
3:l-'olJllIi
OzloJloJW
t::l-i30~
VlziiiVl-
loJ~~~~
~ClloJVlO
~~~~~
Q: VI loJ
Q.$~;!J;~
9t3::;:)::l0
~~loJu
N5:i"'~
o
)-:1- 0
~O$Cl ~
~Vll;j~~ ~
0.: ~~o.:~loJ!Z "
U :;:)05olll-lj
~~z~3:~~~
(5:2t::ll-icl:2offi
~Vlm~~~loJl-
loJ~~o ~o.:~~
x ClXloJ<
I-IL. 0 0:
vi~VI~~:iOU
wl-:J:2m z!Z
Vlo~:2 . .03
~~8~;j~~o.
~~lfo.:"'~o.:o
0.::2 wUUI-
i'!~~gJ~gj;z
IL.frl5!!ij!:!f.!~~
oo.:j!!~ loJ8Cl
VI~O>wX-1II
loJ$o.: ul-~-
~~Q.~>>-5::z
-.....o.:l-Q:mQ.o
~ 10.1 loJ 1=
>Z:2IL.VlOU~
Q:;:)oz~q~
W!;(VlOOOUO
:2_ZloJiiio.:loJiii
OUOloJzQ.ll..z .
VlguVlj!!9tVlou
ClVl ,tx <uti
Z<o loJloJ ...,/"
~!Zl;j~loJ~~atl
w:;:)o~>- w~
~~loJ>-~~85i~
~6m~loJI-Z ~
o.:ol-o.....Q .IL.
o.CIl~O~VlWO':
..t~<Q81-~~~
-'
is...J w....
VlO ~frl
III loJo.:
0loJ~ 0.:0.:
lIi!.!u ~8
j!!ffif5~~o
-,VI~~ I-
~~8j!!~~
>-VlW...JloJloJ
mZ-'oClW
W~VI<z
~8!:;j!!~lil
:i~fh~~ ~
15-0.: loJZ
ti~<loJl-v
ow>-j!:~zlli
Q.m oloJ
~80.:~~~[I.
uOz:;:)fJ~
910.1 .0000:J-,
:;:)x:;:)loJUQ.o
~I-Vl~:2~1II
IX VI~old8~Cl~
.....VI-L<:.3:0
N 88g.~loJ ~~
:J ~~!;(~iil >
i= 0 :2<0:
IX Q:1L.~Q:~f?~
w l:::lffiof?~-o1L.
~ ~Q.!;(3: I x
lrloJ15 !!!~Q.
~ 1i:1II~lt:..;~
<C( 0<:500 x'9
~:2~~~~~
~ wl!!i=OO ~~
::::; ~~~~~9t~
Z
0-
~~
VI:;:)
l;jf?
~~
~~
~z
0.:0
~~
~~
I-~
~lf
Q.loJ
0.:
l:>~
zO:
Q~
I-U
~ii:
Uo
VlZ
~<
~w
VI~
z:;:)
loJ '
~!!!:y
loJw....
loJ~"?
0: .1')
o~x
~VI-
oCloJO
< :2Z
:;:)loJ
ClQ.
..; ~9t
,r'
,
C)
~
CJ
Z
C)
."
!i:
z
,
,
I
I
,/'/
,/,/
~~OJ/,'//
------
"''
"''
/
/
"I";
-------------"..-...
:
,
,
,
I
I
I
,
1
\
\
~\
;1 /~ \\,/
~... ,/
~~ //
S:,,1'
/
)
--
/"""
I
I
,
,
,
I
I
I
I
~_..."I'
:)
,
~/-r-
~ /?,b'
/ /-//- ~
-<8 ,/ I 1)J
\~ ~ / ,/ ~/
Co / I /11>
,/ . ,/'D
" I /
, '
// /,'//
/ /
,/ // .
,,' ...",," J
,/ /,,/'/ I
// ,
,// ~
/ /.
I 'I
, '
, Ii
o( I
,/,/,,10 :
,
/
,/
- . 7</
,
,
,
"
I
o(
//~
,
,
0{
L.~_
~~
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
'/'///
/'/
,
,
0{
,~
//
1//
,//
"
//
//
...,,--
;,,-'"
...,,-'"
/
,/
""-",,
/
"""""
/
,/
//
//
,//
/'///
/
./
/////---
,/,/
/
~ ) \ \~ ~
.1
;
CI
I I . Unl ~ il:l
n~ j 3: -0 ~
G) ~ ~ ~ I
I ~~ i I ~ I~;~ ~~ ;;0
); I I ~ o~
R :x:OD
;::~
~ i 0
G) ~ ~el g ~~
~ ~ . 0
~O <-< ~.
~ . . '" ~ j;;~ ;J; >0
",0
~~g ~ (,Ie m
'1~ ~. F ",;;0
eee ",.... if
)> '"
(It
0\
//,,10
I
Ii
,/,'//
/'/
///
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
/
//
/,'///
//
I
/
I
.'
~..,
~...
. .
xx
~lI:
. .
~~
I I
~~
. .
n .
qUl
o
~
q
!-'" !"-' :-
C> z
::0 0
)> ~
C
Z ~
C)
n
Z B
0
-l
..... ~
(/)
~
i
i!
,..,
."
~
a
~
>!
~
c:
Dl
~ ~~ ~
! ~I ~
~ i
~I~ ~ ~
~1;a,..,o ~ ~
, rn~ ~ ~
::llJ;; ~
~:!1 0 ~
. iii ~ :!I
5j::ll ~ ~
,..,i ,..,
~~ ~ ~
~Q III ~
~l: ~ !T1
-~ ~
~~ ~
~ ::l
o s:
!R
I
\
I
x
x
x
,
,
\
It
. ...
......--
,,-,,"
--......--...
" -269-------------------------------------------
___-----, 6 9----------------
..."......."...,,"-
/
...""",
"...""
,/
/
,/
/
"..."""
_/
_/
-"..."
_/
/
-------......
~
~
--...---"
E:,<1//
_-----G
--...-...-
------"--
...,,--
...---"
...--,,-...--
,,_......
..........-
-----------~
------------------
G B B B I
~!Sg~~ IIIZ -z 1-)Z
9 Z '" ~~ ~~
~~~~~ o~ a ~~
oil l:l< ",
g:~ ,..,
Oco'tl ~~ Ill'" an
~o~~ .......a! ;;0 a! !:i
ogo-l , ",N ~~ ~.-.
'tl "0
gz>o .-~ fllZ Z :!I
'-4Z ~
.,,~ en en;;:! en~ en~ F
", :!Io ::I: 0 en;;o ",;;0 III
z",z... ag ~~ ",,,, fA ~
~;;o~-I oiZ ~g: om III
o~!!lfll I ~en
0"'>'" !-" "'", ~~ z
~~~'tl ~q '''!, ~
;;oen;;O ~ '" 0
;;0 0 . ~
~::I:o;;:! 0 ~o
g?;i"'~ ", ",'"
zm 0 ~"
", Z ?~
",
Z 0
P"
~j
-l
-<
!i "'0
::: 0
o )>
~~
(')
(')
...,
en
en
;;0
o
)>
o
(')
:::0
o
en
en
en
...,
(')
::!
o
z
@) €>
O,..~ Ci!",:e::eoo r.
;o~l- Z,.,gJ:::;OO ~
I:~UJ !!l Z~J:il'i~ il
~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~
r..ol:-i UJl'lz,.,;o::l~ ili
~O(;l Qo::e~{!l~
~a! r-UJo 0 UJ
~o~ 8ffi~ ~~~ i
O"'c z(;I" "II"''''~
~~;u ~~1n~~~~
1:-<", o,.,,..~::lO
C - Z ;00;0 ~
1:1n~ . 8~ail'i~1Il
I: UJ I:~ 6"11
~~~ ~~~~~~-i~
~~lD rl-l-i~,..f!!
,.,_,., ?J::!:Z;o'"
~ ,.,UJ"'~", ~
8000 go-iUJo(jjo;o
Z 0 :::i:e' In
rl~~ rl"llI'1::;i!o ~
~~~ ~~6i,.,[;j a
~I"I r-o;O o~
1:0 I"I",UJi!oz
-i .., ::;I"IZ(;I
1'0 i'D(;I~I"I(;Iil~
-,.. ;0 ::e1"l1;
(Jl(Jl nl"lo~-i(;l
co ;01"10;0
.....(Jl 1nUJ,,"O;oc
o~ ~ J: lD
;08 ~~;g~~UJ~
~I: 0 ~Q (;I
.,-1"11 SlDiF-i
J:)> ;01"1 ;ooJ:
ZO 1"1;0....1"101"1
::l 01"1_"111:
;1!~ 6~~~;!!
5i~ ;OiTl~ +<
!='
~D
-ill Ji:l
f'111I,11: !i ;~~
I III =rrl (;I ~~~
IIDlI~ I~:
"1111 ~ i I!
IIIIIIII~ ~
:1111111 r
~1I11 .... ~;ll ~
~ IIIIII~. - ~
: 1IIIft ~
'IIIIIIIE . ~ ~:
", ~~
~~~f;l -==111 ..' I; (;Ii\;
~S~~ :Dl I ;ll ~~
m~ "IIIIIT~'
~~~~ ~III II l
~; -=f1l~11
~~
o~
~~
I
(')
o
~
"'0
o
C
z
o
)>
:::0
1"1
)>
_ ,I 4" MIN
'-1'111=11 '-i \ ~~X}L
'L~-'-C '1 ~ ~~~
1==111= tf ~ }l'1-cr\
-III-II ~~~.,;t; ;I;
-1_ -III-'-C ~ ~l-c ~ oJ.{)t
- 1- ~~ >-l-H ~.Nr;::;x;
-III-II ~ ~ ~ '-< '"
-1_ -I I II-'-C i1 ~~ H ~~ ).
I == : = ~...x Qr..~ "--< ;:r..
=111==11 ~ ~ ;I;~ ~
11 III~ ~ ~~ ~~~
.111==11 ~OtJ;P~tf ~
(IIII~ -
VI~ !i\~~ !i
II ~~ ~ ~
"'~ ~g ~ ~
n ~n~ '"
I 5~; ~
8 ~o~ '"
~"'!.5 ~
~~~
go~
~~
~
~
I I i l:'~ UUI ~ il:l ~ ~~O ~~ i ~
""C !!l 9:
~ i :I ~ ~ J~ fi- ~~~'
~! ;0 ~ III
() n~l~ ~~;; 00;
0 -~z~ :1:",
;::~
~ o --< 0
~~ z ~~:-o ~ Z;o
I 0> I! ! ;
)>~ -0 == . 0
(;;r- I i a oS 8 ~ .. ~ .J>. ~ <-< ~.
In ~ '" 0 sa ~'-i >n
I ~ ~m ~o 1'.)0
:::c "'c ~I~ 1
~ I ~ ~ 1'.);0 ii)
F 01: ~.. ~~ I'.)-l
~~~~ 8 '1~ ~. I'.) =
~~'i;I 'f'try VIN.\Q f~!- ~.
. e ~ e ,i:j i5 ..:
-~ ... ... ...
m ...J ~~lli.. ~~~~
l5 Ci ~ :::
'" ...J a~ ~ - ~~~
,....", :E
-- a:: "I w~ ::> i
~ =>'" ~~ ~ ~
ON
-E U ~ 8~li18 I d.
~ ~~
r g I
f O. iii l:li I'"
<(0 U
a::Z ~>
0 ~O i I
~:::; ~
"':I: ~O
<XlU ~~ ~Iull 0.0 I w ~
~1i' i 1:
~ Q.. I I
....
"".... ti
~ ~i= ~ 0 z
~ 1( 2~ z 9 ....
3.... ~ e 5 i=
z ~ l!: al
~ i~ III ...
~ ::I 0
::I 0 ~
~lQ ~ ~ ~
~ ::> Ui
z~ z .... ffici ~ >< l!:
al frl ~
~{;l ... ~
0 ::l ~~ ::I~ Z
W 0.._ ~ ::>
~g, ... Ii -< ""
1<l > ~. I~t :; z ...
g i al
~~ 8~ ~i -I ::l
...5:::? fil fil :IE
C'" "'1 ~~ ~ ~
Q:o !i~ ~""2 ~ l5. ~
...~ . ~
:5"'" Uiz ~9a. ~~ 5
zt; ~... ~i '"
~~ ... ~
Wz ~%'Z ~~ III
"'... ~! ~
~:IE l:5~~ "". ~
~z ~~~ ~~ "" ~g
...~ ~~(fJ ~z l:5t1 :3
~z :r
en 0::> ~~~ il ~~ '"
W ~~ ~",2 ~ ~~
I ~ ,....'" z
0
Z ...: N ..; .. .n u:i
~I
zl
~I
~I
~I
~I
=1
3
~Ij
dlc
il~
lj 1;;
N ~
~I II
~L~il
I
(j
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
el-' 1-'
~ VI VI
~ I! I~
il; Iq
;I~ il~
;I~ ;l~
151~ I~
~~
U
~
~
o
lj
::I
b
2
~
~
Ii
2
iX
~
~
z
;t..J
n. If>
o :::;
~, :..
U +t
~I'J
n. ....
o <Xl
1-1 [::,
I~
,....
I~
Id
,
I
I
I
~
.
.
'"
.-
~j
fil:<
E::l8
~J
-~
~L
e::;o
......
~i
~:r
., $
_#'lC"~
0
:i t ;
"" t
- ..J o If> :::; If>
~ o . ~ ~ <( :::;
..J '-' <(
51": 01 a::
... lD 51~ w ~
i= :::;I~ tZo ~i~
a:: ' ,.... I
I <( 0 I @.
"- .1 "-r-.. <0
~I~ o 0'1 W 0'1
n.1~ o <0
N 8111 ~I~ g,7
~
a:: Z O\Z
0 U 0 W 0
l5 If> ;:: :I: -
,.... If> !;(
.... 1f>1~ I~ ~ ~
0
Z If>/..J Id "-'<;1
;;!~ ~ w
w I
a::
~~ 3:
li. zl I
Cl~ !I I I
~lll I
3~ ~I I
,..: zl ~ I
"" I
;
... I
'" ~ "-
ffi I 'II
~ - ::>
5 ~~ II
8 ~~ I
~ "'9 I I'
.. ~a1
N
-::I
~ ;~
... NCl
"" iXl!:
Ii ~~
z
g 0 ~o
as ~ z",
~ ~
i
z
~
""
~
~
z
i
'"
ffi
i5
~
z
~
z
::>
f?
i
~
:>
l:tl
e:
~
~
""
Zw
2~
.....'"
~~
~t;
I.IJz
I
I..J
I~
I~
I'"
I~
w z
~IQ
~lD ~
W ..J
a:: w
1-,..""
)>
I
ZCJ)
S:J:
0""
!::t
~~
,..,
~
C5
z
CJ)
~"Z
=1::00
:I:~r.1
~~
1'10
~~
J;;6
C'lZ
0C'l
c:
zc
~~
::o~
8::!!
c:X
-~
~::o
;r:M
~~
iilF
~CD
01'1
en
O:I:
,,-
1'11'1
::06
~a
0_
Z
~)o
n
;r:n
00
=1::0
~~
enn
1'11'1
Z
en
o
?3
,..,
r
,..,
VI <
q )>
1 ::!
o. 0
Z
)>
~
I
<0
.
,..,
r
<
)>
--l
o
Z
^
,..,
-<
<0
."
CD
.
,;"'1"'.4-'-,
~~---------------,
o
-----------El----1
~~--------- ----,
o I
Oi
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
VI
VI
,"
"1.
VI
o
I"
Ul
.
;r:
>
x
1
.....
.
8'-1 1/8"
2PL
r--,
, I
, ,
, , ,
1 , ,
L_-' ,
O~ I
::0 I
~~ I
_________________J
r
,
z
o
I
,
L
I
1
I
I
,
, ,..,
I ,..,
, <
1 ~ )>
r--, , 1 ::!
, , , ~
I , I ~ 0
, I I 1 ;r:
I , 1 0, ~ aJ
L_-' I
, ~
I .
I <0
1 .....
I "-
I ~
I
J
~
1
7'-10 1/2"
!-1' ;I- ~ !"
>CD CD z~~ Mn~
zc: c: ~=I;!; 'TI0:I:
-<p P M:I:en MZM
"Q 0 n~en
Z I:~en
::oZ CD:I::I: =I::O:I:
0(;) " 1'11'11'1 <C:M
"en ::0 r Mnr
~~ ~ <~ z::!M
F ~-M 00::0
",::0::0
~r " (;) <z
r al ",~Vi ~"Vi
Cal 1'1 g>~ alM~
FiM " 1'1::00
,.. s: !-1'c:o ::o~
-0 ~al ~:I:~
Zn n bM
M~ 1'1 ",1'1
0 ::00 " <n
::01'1 1:1'1 "'::oS:
50 0 en o(;)en
::o~ Z eno a-en
S~ UlZ-
,..:I: n . j;:fij
0::0 0 "'0
~", z ~> c:0
", n ~>
,.. ::0 Oz
-'TI ben
z", ~ "'0
",~ ", CDn ::Oc:
0 S;o I: en
;o~ " rz ",
VI iii en
> . ::0 Qen >"
zl z~
~ ,,::0 ~::o
-<3 c: ",0
nn ~c:
So o~ B"
:I:::O 01'1 "'en
", J'Tl0 all
::01: MZ c:!"
alO
c:::O 'TIn ~~
-'" MO
r nl: z"
O'TI ::!" "",
-::0
Zo <r n=
01: "'j;: OCD
Z
n 0
", J'Tl
en
-<
en
~
1'1
I:
en
",
Vi
enen~
"",n
RVi,..
~~o
::on>
> 0
"'c:
::0 en
1'11'1
en(;)
"::0
00
Zc:
~"
n
o
",
."
....
Q
",
~~~
~ '" en
>
Z
>
!:(
en
Vi
"
::0
o
n
1'1
o
c:
::0
1'1
alenen
~~=I
_en'"
n~n
enns:
5l~~
I: en
i"i'"
len
'TI:I:
~~
n::o
",.
J,<
",
en
Vi
~
Z
"
o8~8~CDpOpp
::oc:.zo~o ~'"
n<:ln-;:U'" -00
M)>en::o~z""
"J;; ~::o(;)~
::oz ",-<~
o~ ::0>
~s: ~~l=
o~ >....1
C:ITJ ::00
::0::0 ::0
",~ ~
o
I I ~! unl~ il:l ." ~
~ J :I ~ ~
'.> ~~ n'll ~ O~ ~I
I' I l:l ~ ... ~
~~ ; ~ ~ oS 8 ~
- I ~ ~m ~o :c
c.n
'" ~ - ~ -
.. .. .. J=
.......... ..... ~ !ll~ ~.
~ IS g
............... )l"
5 ~ ~
r ..
9 1/8"
VI
"
Ul
.....
"-
~
. ..
--------------,
I
1
I
I
I
.'
en
en en
;!;>
"z
,..!i
0::0
@o
1'1,..
o
n
~
5
Z
"-
0-0
bad
bad
OoD
POD
D_D
8'-1"
,..,
r
,..,
<
)>
--l
o
Z
(")
",
.
al
o
~en
~~
........0
en.
z.
~~
-Z
Z
1'1
enx
n:I:
::0>
",c:
"'en
Z~
'b
<0
,"
Ul
VI
........
~
-
~
1'1
I:
~
en
>
Z
o
o
."
....
6" ~
::0
>
"
r-----------------,
.
C'l
fTl
Z
<
1'1
Z
~
I
I
,
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
,
,
1
I
I
L_________________J
10'-7" MAX
~ U)
0 ~
M I'T1
~ en ::0 .... en
Z Z 0 5 0 r
0 0 Z
0 ~enen...."~ 'TI 0 -I
z~al~al,.. ::0 n
MZS;z~o i!izzs:::o,.. . ::0 I'T1
<: .
~oQOi"iE; ::OOO~OO <: ~ :::0
;r:~~ c:> M
~,..",~i30 M ::0
~~~~~ ,.. ,.. ~
oxo ~ z
;g@~~i3 ='1>"....en ~
)>00 Z 0 0 0
MC:'--l>en n_eneno
~~8z" ~;r:C:z~ -I
0,,::00
onM .::O~M::E5 I'T1
jijn::oMa
M~-<~' Sl~~.> U)
OM n< ~n~!='
0(;) ~ ~O!='.."tl
q~ ~ ....:o~
." -< "
i"i ... fj-<')
iii ...
Z 0
~ :0
...
H-n-~<o ----f'tr,J VI
o . 0 000,,"0 0 Ul
. 0 0
CD ;r: "" "
" en en en "
:I: ........ .... Ul
....
;0
000
IlA
I:~
o
Z::o
0>
. 0
<-<
)>n
",0
lAC:
"';U
",....
'"
I
~
~.
m
if
(It
... "
.
On-site looking toward 1-64
Existing ground-equipment shed
Dry Bridge Rd bridge across 1-64
From Dry Bridge Rd other side of 1-64
. ..~
From rest-stop exit ramp on 1-64
From westbound lane of 1-64
Extreme close-up from westbound land of
I "'" ~
. .
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
Project #: Name ARB-2007-114: Weber Property (Verizon Wireless) Tier III
Review Type Advisory Review for a Special Use Permit and Preliminary Review of a
Site Development Plan
Parcel Identification Tax Map 73, Parcel31D
Location 53 Dry Bridge Rd.: Located on the west side of Dry Bridge Rd. (Route
708), approximately 400 feet south of Interstate 64, approximately 1.8
miles west of Exit 114 (Ivy).
Zoned Rural Areas (RA), Entrance Corridor (EC)
Owner David Weber, Trustee
Applicant Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless (Stephen Waller, AICP)
Magisterial District Samuel Miller
Proposal To install a Personal Wireless Service Facility consisting of a 100 foot-tall
steel monopole, with associated antennas, ground equipment, fence and
shelter disguised as a farm building.
ARB Meeting Date December 3, 2007
Staff Contact Margaret Maliszewski
SITE/PROJECT HISTORY
There are three existing telecommunications facilities on this property. The ARB reviewed and approved two
of these in 1999 and 2000. The third facility was located just beyond 500' from the EC and was not reviewed
by the ARB. A balloon test was conducted for the current proposal on November 8, 2007.
PROJECT DETAILS
The applicant proposes to establish a telecommunications facility in a 50' x 50' lease area:
. A metal monopole is proposed at 100' tall with top height at 797 AMSL.
. The base elevation of the lease area is 697 AMSL.
. Coaxial cables are proposed to run inside the monopole.
· All ground equipment is to be housed in a prefabricated equipment shelter that measures 12' w x
30.42' I x 10.58' h. The shelter would be hidden in an outer structure designed to look like a farm
building.
· The monopole and antennas are to be painted Sherwin Williams Java Brown #6090.
· Three antennas are proposed to be flush-mounted to the pole with a maximum of 12" between the face
of the pole and the outer face of the antenna.
Attachment C
ARB 12/3/2007 Weber (Verizon) - Page 1
41 .-
Other pertinent information:
. The area is currently accessed by a gravel driveway off of Dry Bridge Road. The gravel drive would
be extended to the proposed site of the new monopole. The extended drive would be 12' wide.
. No trees are to be removed for the proposal.
. The reference tree (#178) is a 42" caliper Oak, 88' tall at 787 AMSL. The monopole is within 3' of
the drip line of the reference tree.
. Minimal grading is proposed.
CONTEXT
The site is located approximately 408' from the 164 right-of-way at the edge of a wooded area near fields and
other telecommunications facilities. The surrounding area is generally rural in character.
ANALYSIS (based on plans T-1, T-2, C-1, C-lA, C-lB, C-2, C-2A, C-3, C-4, C-5 and A-I with revision date
of 9-17-07)
Issue: Visibility
Comments: A balloon test was conducted on November 8, 2007. The balloon was minimally visible from the 1-
64 Entrance Corridor. When it was visible, it was visible for short periods of time, both eastbound and
westbound. It was seen through trees in both the median and along the right-of-way. When traveling
westward, trees along Dry Bridge Road also helped screen the existing monopoles and minimize the visibility
of the balloon. The pole, in the location and at the height of the balloon that was flown, is expected to have
visibility similar to that of the other existing monopoles. That level of visibility is not expected to create a
negative impact on the EC. Ground equipment is not expected to be visible from the EC and the antennas at
the top of the pole are not expected to be readily distinguished from the pole itself. The antenna dimensions are
illustrated on a cut sheet, but they are not included on the plans.
Recommendations: Include the antenna dimensions on the plans.
Issue: Lighting
Comments: Sheet C2 indicates that a motion censored photocell shielded light is proposed for the shelter. The
cut sheet provided is for a Lithonia TWP wall pack, which is not a full cutoff fixture. The applicant's memo
indicates that a retrofit full cutoff solution is being pursued for the fixture. A full cutoff fixture is preferred,
although it is not required by ordinance for security lighting that is controlled by sensors that provide
illumination for 15 minutes or less. The standard lighting note ("Proposed illumination is for temporary
maintenance purposes only") does not appear on the plans.
Recommendations: Add the following note to the plans: "Proposed illumination is for temporary maintenance
purposes only".
Issue: Number of monopoles at the site
Comments: During some previous reviews of telecommunications facilities, the ARB has noted that multiple
monopoles at a site could have more significant negative impact on the EC than a single facility would, based
on the concept that a greater quantity of poles would be more noticeable, more recognizable and more visible
from the EC. With this proposal, this site would have four monopoles. Despite the number of monopoles, the
quantity is still not expected to create a negative impact, as viewed from the EC, due to the minimal visibility
of the existing poles and the anticipated limited visibility of the proposed pole.
Recommendations: None.
ARB 12/3/2007 Weber (Verizon) - Page 2
. ..,.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 Mcintire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832
Fax (434) 972-4126
December 21, 2007
Verizon Wireless
c/o Stephen Waller, AICP
536 Pantops Center, PMB 320
Charlottesville, VA 22911
RE: ARB-2007-114: Weber Property (Verizon Wireless) Tier ITI
Tax Map 73, Parcel 31D
Dear Mr, Waller:
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on Monday,
December 3, 2007. The Board approved the request, by a vote of 4:0, pending staff administrative approval of
the following conditions:
1. Include the antenna dimensions on the plans.
2. Add the following note to the plans: "Proposed illumination is for temporary maintenance and security
purposes only".
Please provide:
1. Two full sets of revised drawings addressing each of these conditions. Include updated ARB revision
dates on each drawing.
2. A memo including detailed responses indicating how each condition has been satisfied. If changes
other than those requested have been made, identify those changes in the memo also. Highlighting the
changes in the drawing with "clouding" or by other means will facilitate review and approval.
3. The attached "Revised Application Submittal" form. This form must be returned with your revisions to
ensure proper tracking and distribution.
When staff's review ofthis information indicates that all conditions of approval have been met, a Certificate of
Appropriateness may be issued.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Margaret Maliszewski
Principal Planner
Cc: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless1831 Rady CourtRichmond, Va 23222
Clark-Nexsen 6160 Kempsville Circle Norfolk, Va 23502
Weber, David Carl Trust; Michael Joseph Weber Trustee 1855 Westview RdCharlottesville Va 22903
Summer Frederick, Zoning and Current Development
Tl~1 _
-- ~
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion:
1. Anticipated visibility of the monopole from the EC.
2. Anticipated impact of four facilities at this site.
Staff recommends approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness, with the following conditions:
1. Include the antenna dimensions on the plans.
2. Add the following note to the plans: "Proposed illumination is for temporary maintenance purposes only".
ARB 12/3/2007 Weber (Verizon) - Page 3
Kenneth C. Boyd
Rivanna
COUNTYOFALBE~E
Office of Board of Supervisors
40 1 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(434) 296-5843 FAX (434) 296-5800
Dennis S. Rooker
Jack Jouett
Lindsay G. Dorrier, If.
Scottsville
David L. Slutzky
Rio
Ann H. Mallek
White Hall
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
February 13, 2008
Mr. Roberto Fonseca Martinez
Mr. Ed Sundra
Federal Highway Administration
400 N Eighth St
Richmond VA 23219-4805
sent by email to: ED.SUNDRA@FHWA.DOT.GOV
Dear Mr. Fonseca Martinez and Mr. Sundra:
We appreciate Mr. Sundra's meeting with two of our members on Thursday, February 7th, and
clarifying certain issues,
The Albemarle Board of Supervisors today reaffirms its vote on August 1 , 2007, in support of its
request that a temporary bridge be constructed as soon as possible, to replace the closed truss bridge over
the North Fork of the Rivanna on Route 743 at Advance Mills.
1. A reliable detour has been identified by residency engineers.
2, The temporary bridge will meet a local need on a short term basis to reconnect hundreds
of County families living north of the bridge to emergency services and county facilities.
The bridge in place will cut in half the travel time from the first-do fire station and emergency
medical services in Earlysville.
The bridge will allow the County to provide consistent services to its Advance Mills residents,
restore a regional connector route for travelers from northern counties to Charlottesville and allow the
economy of the area to recover.
We urge you to re-establish the separate utility for the temporary bridge and advertise the
previously prepared RFP for a temporary bridge, to be constructed in the spring of 2008.
Sincerely,
t2v~c~,~
Kenneth C. Boyd
Chairman
KCB/ewj