Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-05-19 A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, WAS HELD AT THE OFFICE BUILDING OF SAID COUNTY ON THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, PRESENT: MESSRS. EDGAR N. GARNETT, GARRETT W. KIRKSEY~ GEORGE O. PALMER, PAUEETT~ ROBERT THRAVES AND R. A. YANCEY. ABSENT: NONE. OFFICERS PRESENT: COUNTY E~ECUTIVE~ COMMONWEALTHIS ATTORNEY AND ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT. THE MEETING OPENED WITH THE LORDIS PRAYER LED BY MR. GARNETT. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF APRIL ~1 AND MAY 5~ 1966, WERE APPROVE~ AS SUBMITTED. ON MOTION, DULY MADE AND SECONDED, THE FOLLOWING PERSONS WERE NAME~ AS ROAD VIEWERS FOR THE CURRENT YEAR, ANY THREE OF WHOM MAY SERVE~ AND JUNE ~, t9~, AT 9:00 A.M. WAS SET AS THE TIME FOR VIEWING CURRENT ROAD REQUESTS: ~R. ALBERT P. AUSTIN MR. JOHN W. 0LAYTON MR. STEVE MCCAULEY ~Ro SAMUEL PAGE MR. LEGH ~ALKER MR. Ac So BROWN~ RESIDENT HIGHWAY ~NG~NEER, INTRODUCED TO THE ~OARD MR. JAMES YATES WHO EXPLAINED IN SOME DETAIL TENTATIVE PLANS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO ROUTE 250 EAST. HE STATED THAT THE PLANS COVERED WORK WHICH WOULD HAVE TO BE DONE IN THE FORSEEABLE FUTURE~ HOWEVER NO FUNDS FOR SAME WERE INCLUDED IN THE SIX-YEAR PLAN. MR. YATES EXPLAINED THAT THE PURPOSE OF PRESENTING THESE PLANS AT THIS TIME WAS TO SOLICIT THE AID OF THE ~OARD OF SUPERVISORS IN MAINTAINING FREE RIGHTS OF WAY FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. MR. YATES WAS TOLD THAT THIS ~OARD WOULD REQUEST THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO WORK TOWARD THIS END. 0OMMUNICATIONS WERE RECEIVED FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ENCLOSING COPIES OF SECONDARY SYSTEM ALLOCATIONS FOR 19~-~? AND TENTATIVE ALLOCATI-ONS FOR INTERSTATE AND RURAL PRIMARY CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SAME PERIOD. NOTICE WAS ALSO GIVEN ON PUBLIC HEARINGS BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.~. ON JUNE ~, 196~ IN THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT AUDITORIUM IN RICHMOND FOR THE CULPEPER ~ISTRICT. COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM ~R. 0HARLES ~. HURT REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF CERTAIN ROADS IN CARRSBROOK SUBDIVISION. ON MOTION OF MR. PALMER~ SECONDED BY MR. KiRKSEY, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, THAT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS BE A ND IS HEREBY QUESTED TO ACCEPT INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS THE FOLLOWING ROADS LOCATED IN CARRSBROOK SUBDIVISION, ALBEMARLE 0OUNTY: CHEROKEE COURT BEGINNING AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH ~ONOCAN DRIVE AND CONTINUING APPROXIMATELY ~00 FEET TO ITS TERMI- NATION. SHAWNEE COURT BEGINNING AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH MONACAN DRIVE AND CONTINUING APPROXIMATELY ~0 FEET TO ITS TERMI- NATION. POWHATAN CIRCLE BEGINNING AT ITS ~NTERSECTION_WITH MOHICAN DRIVE AND CONTINUING APPROXIMATELY 5~0 FEET TO ITS TERMI- NATION, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF H~GHWAYS BE AND IS HEREBY GUARANTEED A ~O-FT. UNOBSTRUCTED RIGHT OF WAY ALONG THESE REqUESTEB ADDITIONS, ALONG WITH DRAINAGE EASEMENTS~ THE SAME HAVING BEEN RECORDED BY PLAT IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN DEED BOOK 3~?~ PAGE ~69. MR. KIRKSEY NOMINATED MR. JOHN MARSHALL LEE TO REPLACE THE LATE MR. Wo W. BROWN ON THE WELFARE BOARD~ WHICH APPOINTMENT WAS SECONDED BY MR. THRAVES AND UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. IT WAS NOTED THAT THiS TERM RUNS THROUGH JUNE 30~ 1967. STATEMENTS OF EXPENSES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE~ THE SHERIFF~S OFFICE, AND THE OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH]S ATTORNEY WERE PRESENTED FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL~ 1~o ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR. PAULETT~ AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, THESE STATEMENTS WERE APPROVED. STATEMENT OF EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THE COUNTY JAIL WAS SUBMITTED ALONG WITH SUMMARY STATEMENT OF PRISONER DAYS FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL~ 1~6~o ON MOTION OF MR. PALMER~ SECONDED BY MR. ~IRKSEY~ THESE STATEMENTS WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. REPORTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH, ~, WERE PRESENTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 63-67.1 AND ~}-~?.2 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA AND WERE ORDERED FILED. CLAIM OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HOSPITAL IN THE AMOUNT OF ~1,/+/+}o~?, WAS PRESENTED FOR HOSPITALIZATION OF INDIGENT PATIENTS UNDER SLH AND WAS APPROVED FOR PAYMENT ON MOTION OF MR. YANCEY~ SECONDED BY MR. PALMER. REPORT OF THE 0OUNTY EXECUTIVE FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL~ 19~ WAS PRESENTED AND ORDERED FILED. PETITION WAS RECEIVED FROM A NUMBER OF RESIDENTS IN THE COUNTY~ HEADED BY MR. A. E. MERCADO~ REQUESTING THE BOARD TO PROMOTE A DRIVE TO CLEAN UP AND PAINT UP ALBEMARLE COUNTY. ON MOTION OF MR. YANCEY~ SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY, IT WAS ORDERED THAT THIS PETITION BE ACKNOWLEDGED AND THE HOPE WAS EXPRESSED THAT CIVIC CLUBS IN THE COUNTY WOULD WORK TOWARD THiS END. AT 10=00 A.M. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED LOCAL SALES TAX ORDINANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NOTICE PUBLISHED IN THE DAILY P~OGRESS ON MAY ~ AND MAY 16~ 1~6. THE 0RD~NANCE WAS READ IN iTS ENTIRETY BY THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE. MR. YANCEY MOVED FOR ADOPTION OF THE ORDINANCE~ WHICH MOTION WAS SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY. A NUMBER OF PERSONS SPOKE REGARDING THIS MATTER, A NUMBER OF WHOM FAILED TO IDENTIFY THEMSELVES. AMONG THOSE IN OPPOSITION WERE A ~RS. NEAL, MRS. CONLEY AND MR. MCCURDY. WALTER YOUNG, HOMER KENIMER AND MRS. MARY F. CASH EXPEESSED VIEWS IN FAVOR OF 8AVE. AFTER PUBLIC HEARING, THE ORDINANCE AS FOLLOWS WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE: AYES= ~ESSRS. GARNETT~ KIRKSEY~ PALMER~ PAULETT, THRAVES AND YANCEY. NAYES: NONE. AN ORDINANCE TO IMPOSE A LOCAL COUNTY SALES TAX IN ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, PURSUANT TO 0HAPTER 8.1, TITLE ~8 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA (CHAPTER 1~1, ACTS OF ASSEMBLY OF 1966) AT THE RATE OF ONE PER CENT TO PROVIDE REVENUE FOR THE ~ENERAL FUND OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY; SUCH TAX TO BE ADDED TO THE. RATE OF THE STATE SALES TAX IMPOSED BY CHAPTER ~.1~ TITLE ~8 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA~ AND TO BE SUBdECT TO ALL THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER ~.1~ TITLE ~8 OF THE CODE~OF VtRGINIA~ ALL THE AMENDMENTS THERETO~ AND:;THE RULES AND REGULATIONS PUBLISHED WITH RESPECT THERETO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Of ALBEMARLE OOUNTY, VIRGINIA, AS FOLLOWS: SEOTION I. GENERAL RETAIL SALES TAX FOR THE 0OUNTY OF ALBEMARLE. PURSUANT TO TITLE 58, CHAPTER 8.1, SECTION 58-4&1.&9 or THE CODE OF VIRGINIA, A LOCAL GENERAL RETAIL SALES TAX AT THE RATE OF ONE PER DENT TO PROVIDE REVENUE FOR THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE 0OUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, iS HEREBY LEVIED. SAID TAX SHALL BE ADDED TO THE RATE OF THE STATE SALES TAX IMPOSED BY 0HAPTER TITLE 58 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA. IT 8HALL BE SUBdECT TO ALL PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 8.1 OF TITLE 58 OF THE 0ODE OF VIRGINIA~ ALL BHE AMENDMENTS THERETO~ AND THE RULES AND REGULATIONS PUBLISHED WiTH RESPECT THERETO. SECTION 2. ADMINISTRATION AND 0OLLEOTIONo PURSUANT TO TITLE 58, CHAPTER 8.1, SECTION 58-/+Al.&9 OF THE 0ODE OF VIRGINIA, THE LOCAL GENERAL RETAIL SALES TAX LEVIED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE ADMINISTERED AND COLLECTED BY THE STATE TAX 0OMMISSIONER OF THE COMMON- WEALTH OF VIRGINIA IN THE SAME MANNER, SUBOEOT TO THE SAME PENALTIES AS PROVIDED FOR THE STATE SALES TAX~ WITH THE ADdUSTMENTS REQU[BED BY SECTION 58-~1.50 AND 58-/J~1.51. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANOEo EFFEOTtVE DATE OF THIS 0RDINANOE SHALL BE THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER~ 1966, THE CLERK CT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE 0OUNTY SHALL FORTHWITH FORWARD TO THE STATE TAX COMMISSIONER OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS ORDINANOE~ SO THAT IT WiLL BE RECEIVED WITHIN FIVE DAYS AFTER ITS ADOPTION. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY TAX ORDINANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NOTICE PUBLISHED IN THE DAILY PROGRESS ON MAY 9 AND MAY 16, 1966. THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE READ THE ORDINANCE IN ITS ENTIRETY AFTER WHICH THE SAME WAS PROPOSED FOR ADOBTION BY MR. PALMER~ SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY. THOSE SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION TO THE ORDINANCE INOLUDED MR. CHRISTIAN~ MR. MOCURDY, ~ALTER YOUNG, GREY MILLER~ MR. CREASY, DON REID AND OTHERS, AFTER PUBLIC HEARING~ THE ORDINANCE AS FOLLOWS WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE: AYES: MESSRS. GARNETT~ KIRKSEY~ PALMER¢ PAULETT~ THRAVES AND YANOEY. NAYES: NONE. AN ORDINANCE TO IMPOSE A TAX ON PERSeNS IN ALBEMARLE 0OUNTY PURCHASING CERTAI~ UTILITY SERVICES OF FIVE PER CENT (5%) OF THE CHARGE MADE BY THE SELLER~ TO PROVIDE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS THEREON~ TO PROVIDE REVENUE FOR THE GENERAL FUND OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 58-587.1 AND 58=617.2 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA (CHAPTER ~40, ACTS OF ASSEMBLY OF ~966). BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE 0OUNTY, VIRGINIA~ THAT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 58--587ol AND 58-617.2 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINI~ (CHAPTER 5&O, ACTS OF ASSEMBLY OF 1.966), A TAX ON PERSONS PURCHASING CERTAIN UTILITY SER- VICES~ TO PROVIDE REVENUE FOR THE GENERAL FUND OF ALBEMARLE OOUNTY~ IS HEREBY LEVIED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. THE FOLLOWING WORDS AND TERMS~ WHEN USED IN THIS ORDINANCE IN RELATION TO UTILITY TAXES, SHALL~ FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ORDINANOE~ HAVE THE FOLLOWING RESPECTIVE MEANINGS EXCEPT WHERE THE CONTEXT CLEARLY INDICATES A DIFFERENT MEANING; 0OMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL. THE PHRASE ~COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL~ SHALL INCLUDE~ IN ADDITION TO THE NORMAL WCR~ USAGE~ BUILDINGS HAVING A SINGLE METER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ELECTRICITY TO TWO OR MORE DWELLING UNITS OR HAVING A CENTRAL TELEPHONE SWITCHBOARD FURNISHING TELEPHONE SERVICE TO TWO OR MORE DWELLING UNITS. PERSON° THE WORD ~PERSONt~ SHALL ~NCLUDE IND~V~DUALS~ FIRMS~ PARTERSHiPS~ ASSOC1AT~ONS~ CORPORATIONS AND OOMB~NATIONS OF INDIVIDUALS OF WHATEVER FORM AND OHARACTER. PURCHASER, THE WORD ~PURCHASER~ SHALL ~NCLUDE EVERY PERSON WHO PURCHASES A ~LITY SERVICE, SELLER° THE WGBD ~SELLERt~ SHALL INCLUDE EVERY PERSON~ WHETHER A PUBLIC SERVlOE OORPORATION OR A MUNICIPALITY OR PRIVATE CORPORATION OR NOT~ WHO SELLS OR FURNISHES A UTILITY SERVICE. UTILITY SERVIOEo THE PHRASE ~UTILITY SERVIOE~ SHALL ~NCLUDE A LOOAL EXCHANGE TELEPHONE SERVICE AND ELECTR~O SERVICE FURNISHED WITHIN THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, ~ES~IDENTIAL, THE WORD ~RESIDENTIAL~ SHALL INCLUDE~ IN ADDITION TO THE NORMAL WORD USAGE~ BUILDINGS HAVING SINGLE OR MULTIPLE METERS FOR THE FURNISHING OF ELECTRICITY USED IN MAINTAINING A PLAOE OF ABODE OR IN NORMAL FARMING OPERATIONS OR HAVING LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE TO ONE OR MORE BUILDINGS MAKING UP A PLACE OF ABODE. SEOT~ON ~. TAX RATE~ LEVY; PROCEDURE AS TO PAYMENT. ~EGINNING ~ULY 1~ 1~ AND CONTINUING THEREAFTER UNLESS OTHERWISE CHANGED~ THERE IS HEREBY IMPOSED AND LEVIED ~Y THE COUNTY UPON EACH AND EVERY P~RCHASE OF UTILITY SERVICE AS SET FORTH HEREIN A TAX FOR GENERAL PURPOSES IN THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS: (A) ON PURCHASERS OF ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES~ THE TAX SHALL BE IN THE AMOUNT OF FIVE PER CENT (~) OF THE CHARGE ON METER READINGS TAKEN ON OR AFTER ~ULY 1~ 19~ EXCLUSIVE OF ANY FEDERAL OR STATE TAX THEREON~ MADE BY THE SELLER AGAINST THE PURCHASER WITH RESPECT TO SUCH RESIDENTIAL ELECTRIC SERVICE; PROVIDED~ HOWEVER~ THAT IN,ANY CASE A MONTHLY BILL SUBMITTED BY THE SELLER FOR ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES SHALL EXCEED TWENTY DOLLARS (~20.00)~ THERE SHALL BE NO TAX COMPUTED ON SO MUCH OF SUCH BILL AS SHALL EXCEED TWENTY DOLLARS (~0o00); EXCEPT THAT THERE SHALL BE NO', TAX COMPUTED ON BILLS SUB- MITTED FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR WATER HEATING WHERE A SEPARATE METER IS USED SOLELY FOR WATER HEATING SERVICE. (~) 0N' PURCHASERS OF ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES~ THE TAX SHALL BE iN THE AMOUNT OF FIVE PER CENT (~) OF THE CHARGE ON METER READINGS TAKEN ON OR AFTER"~ULY 1, 195~, EXCLUSIVE OF ANY FEDERAL OR STATE TAX THEREON~ MADE ~Y THE SELLER AGAINST THE PURCHASER WITH RESPECT TO SUCH COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC SERVICE; PROVIDED~ HOWEVER~ THAT IN ANY CASE ANY MONTHLY BILL SUBMITTED BY THE SELLER FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR OOMMEROIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES SHALL EXCEED ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS (~1~500.00)~ THERE SHALL BE NO TAX COMPUTED ON SO MUCH OF SUCH BILL AS SHALL EXCEED ONE ~OUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS (C) ON P~RCHASERS OF TELEPHONE SERVICE FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES~THE TAX SHALL BE IN THE AMOUNT OF FIVE PER CENT (~) OF THE CHARGE MADE ON OR AFTER dULY 1966) EXCLUSIVE OF ANY FEDERAL OR STATE TAX THEREON~ MADE BY THE SELLER AGAINST THE PURCHASER WITH RESPECT TO SUCH RESIDENTIAL TELEPHONE SERVICE; PROVIDED~ HOWEVER~ THAT IN ANY CASE A MONTHLY BILL SUBMITTED BY THE SELLER FOR TELEPHONE SERVICE FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES SHALL. EXCEED TWENTY DOLLARS (¢20,00)~ THERE SHALL BE NO TAX COMPUTED ON SO MUCH OF SUCH BiLL AS SHALL EXCEED TWENTY DOLLARS (~20o00) o (D) ON PURCHASERS OF TELEPHONE SERVICE FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES~ THE TAX SHALL BE IN THE AMOUNT OF FiVE PER CENT (~) OF THE CHARGE MADE ON OR AFTER JULY 1~ 1966~ EXCLUSIVE OF ANY FEDERAL OR STATE TAX THEREON~ MADE BY THE SELLER AGAINST THE PURCHASER WITH RESPECT TO SUCH COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL TELEPHONE SERVIOE; PROVlDED¢ HOWEVER~ THAT tN ANY CASE ANY MONTHLY BILL SUBMITTED BY THE SELLER FOR TELEPHONE SERVICE FOR CCMMEROtAL OR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES SHALL EXCEED ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS (~1,~00.0¢, THERE SHALL BE NO TAX COMPUTED ON SO MUCH OF SUCH BILLAAS SHALL EXCEED ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS (¢1,500.00). SECTION 3. UTILITY BILLS~ MONTHLY OR OTHERWISE. BILLS SHALL BE CONSIDERED MONTHLY BILLS IF SUBMITTED TWELVE TIMES ANNUALLY FOR A PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH OR PORTION THEREOF. IN 6ASH BILLS ARE SUB- MITTED BY ANY SELLER FOR TWO MONTHS~ SERVICE~ THERE SHALL BE NO TAX COMPUTED ON SO MUCH OF SUCH BILL AS SHALL EXCEED FORTY DOLLARS (~OoO0)FOR RESIDENT&AL PURPOSES OR THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS (~000.00) FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES. SECTION &. ~EQU~REMENTS PARTICULARLY APPLICABLE TO TELEPHONE SERVICE. THE TAX IMPOSED AND LEVIED BY THIS ORDINANCE ON PURCHASERS WITH RESPECT TO TELEPHONE SERVICE SHALL APPLY TO ALL CHARGES MADE FOR LOCAL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE SERVICE EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS: (A) 0OIN BOX TELEPHONE, THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE GUARANTEED CHARGE ON EACH BILL RENDERED FOR SEMI-PUBLIC COIN BOX TELEPHONE SERVICE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASIS FOR TH/ TAX WITH RESPECT TO THE PURCHASER OF SUCH SERVICE~ BUT NO OTHER TAX SHALL BE IMPOSED ON TELEPHONE SERVICE PAID FOR BY INSERTING COINS IN COIN-OPERATED TELEPHONES. (B) FLAT RATE SERVICE. ~ITH RESPECT TO FLAT RATE AND FLAT MESSAGE RATE SERIVCE~ THE TAX SHALL APPLY TO ONLY THE AMOUNT PAYABLE FOR LOCAL AREA SERVICE AND SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY SPECIFIC CHARGE FOR CALLS TO POINTS OUTSIDE THE 0OUNTY OR TO ANY GENERAL CHARGE OR RATE DIFFERENTIAL PAYABLE FOR THE PRIVILEGE OF CALLING POINTS OUTSIDE THE 0OUNTY. (C) M_._ESSAGE RATE SERVI~E.o WHERE PURCHASERS OF TELEPHONE SERVICE ARE CHARGED ON A MESSAGE RATE BASIS~ THE TAX SHALL APPLY ONLY TO THE BASIC CHARGE FOR SUCH SER- VICE AND SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY CHARGE FOR ADDITIONAL MESSAGE UNITS, SECTION 5o DUTY Of OOUNTY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE° THE OOUNTY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE SHALL BE CHARGED WITH THE POWER AND DUTY OF COLLEOTING THE TAXES ~MPOSED AND LEVIED UNDER THIS ORDINANCE. SEOTION 6o PRESORIPTION Of FORMS FOR REPORTS~ ETOo THE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF ~NANCE MAY PRESCRIBE FORMS FOR FILING OF ANY REPCRT OR THE PAYMENT OF ANY FUNDS SET FORTH IN THIS ORDINANCE, SECTION ?, ~UTY OF SELLER GENERALLY, (A) IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF EVERY SELLER IN ACTING AS THE TAX COLLECTION MEDIUM OR AGENCY FOR THE OOUNTY TO COLLECT FROM THE PURCHASER FOR USE OF THE OOUNTY~ THE TAX IMPOSED AND LEVIED BY THIS ORDINANCE AT THE TIME OF COLLECTINGUTHE PURCHASE PRICE CHARGED THEREFOR~ AND THE TAXES COLLECTED DURING EACH CALENDAR MONTH OR BILLING PER~OD SHALL BE REPORTED AND PAID BY EACH SELLER TO THE OOUNTY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE BY THE LAST DAY OF THE SEOOND CALENDAR MONTH THEREAFTER~ TOGETHER WITH THE NAME AN~ ADDRESS OF ANY PURCHASER WHO HAS REFUSED TO PAY HIS TAX, (B~ ~N ALL OASES WHERE THE SELLER COLLECTS THE PRIOE ~OR UTILITY SERVICE IN STATED PERIODS~ THE TAX IMPOSED AND LEVIES BY THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE OOMPUTED ON THE AMOUNT OF PURCHASE ~UR1NG THE MONTH OR PERI09 ACCORDING TO EACH BILL RENDERED~ PROVIDED THE AMOUNT OF TAX TO BE COLLECTED SHALL BE THE NEAREST WHOLE CENT TO THE AMOUNT OOMPUTE~o SECTION ~. ~EOOR~S TO BE KEPT BY SELLER, EACH SELLER SHALL KEEP OOMPLETE RECORDS SHOWING ALL PURCHASERS IN THE OOUNTY~ WHICH REOORDS SHALL SHOW THE PRICE OHARGE~ AGAINST EACH PURCHASER WITH RESPECT TO EACH PURCHASE~ THE DATE THEREOF AND THE DATE OF PAYMENT THEREOF~ A~D THE AMOUNT OF TAX IMPOSED HEREUNDER AND SUCH RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT OPEN FOR ~NSPEOTION BY THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENTS OF THE COUNTY ~URING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS ON BUSINESS ~AYS~ AN~ THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENTS OF THE OOUNTY SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT~ POWER AND AUTHORITY TO MAKE SUCH TRANSCRIPTS THEREOF DURING SUQH TIMES AS THEY MAY DESIRE, SECTION ~o EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING RETURN. THE COUNTY ~IREOTOR OF ~INANOE MAY EXTEND~ FOR GO0~ OAUSE SHOWN~ THE TIME OF FILING ANY RETURN REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THiS ORDINANOE~ PROVlDE~ HOWEVER~ NO SUCH EXTENSION SHALL EXCEED A PERIOD OF NINETY ~AYS, SECTION 10, EXEMPTIONS FROM ORDINANOEo THE UNITED STAT~OF AMERICA~ ~IPLOMATIC PERSONNEL EXEMPTED BY THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STA'TES~ THE STATE AND THE POLITICAL SUBD~VISIONS~ BOAR~S~ COMMISSIONS AN~ THE AUTHORITIES AND AGENCIES THEREOF~ ARE HEREBY EXEMPT FROM THE PAYMENT OF THE TAX IMPOSED AND LEVIED BY THIS OR~INANCE WITH RESPECT TO THE PURCHASE OF UTILITY SERVICES USED BY SUCH GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES, SECTION 11. PENALTIES. ANY PURCHASER FA ILING~ REFUSING OR NEGLECTING TO PAY THE TAX IMPOSED OR LEVIED BY THIS ORDINANCE AND ANY SELLER VIOLATING THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE AND ANY OFFICER, AGENT OR EMPLOYEE OF ANY SELLER VIOLATING THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE BHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR AND SHALL BE PUNISHED BY A FINE OF NOT LESS THAN TEN DOLLARS (~10.00) NOR MORE THAN THREE UUNDRED DOLLARS (~00.O0) OR BY IMPRISONMENT IN OAIL FOR NOT MORE THAN THREE MONTHS, OR BY BOTH SUCH FINE AND IMPRISONMENT. EAOH FAILURE~ REFUSAL, NEGLECT OR VIOLATION AND EACH DAYIS CONTINUANCE THEREOF SHALL CONSTITUTE A SEPARATE OFFENSE. SUCH CONVICTION SHALL NOT RELIEVE ANY PERSON FROM THE PAYMENT~ COLLECTION AND REMITTANCE OF SUCH TAX AS PROVIDED BY THIS ORDINANCE. SEOTION 12. EFFECTIVE DATE. THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE ON AND AFTER JULY 1, 1966. THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDED THAT THE BEAVER 0REEK LAKE BE OPENED JULY 2~ 1966, AND PRESENTED CERTAIN RULES AND REGULATIONS WHICH HE RECOMMENDED BE ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE IN CONNECTION WITH OPERATION OF THE LAKE. ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY, SECONDED BY MR. YANCEY, IT WAS ORDERED THAT PROPER NOTICE BE PUBLISHED OF INTENT OF THIS BOARD TO ADOPT SUCH AN ORDINANCE AND SET 10~O0 A.M. ON JUNE 16, 1966, AS TIME FOR PUBLtO HEARING ON SAME. COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MR. L~NWOOD 0. FOSTER COMMENDING MR. LYLE CASSELL~ EXTENSION AGENT, FOR THE FINE WORK HE IS DOING WITH THE 4-H CLUBS. REPORT OF THE S.P.C.A. FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL, 1966~ WAS RECEIVED, APPROVED AND ORDERED FILED. 0LA1M AGAINST THE DOG TAX FUND WAS RECEIVED FROM JOHN T. WALKER FOR ONE LAMB AND ONE EWE KILLED BY DOGS. 0U MOTION OF MR. PALMER, SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY, ~R. WALKER WAS ALLOWED ~1~.00 FOR THE LAMB AND ~10.00 FOR THE EWE. CLAIM AGAINST THE DOG TAX FUND WAS RECEIVED FROM CHARLES ~. EVANS FOR TWO EWES AND TWO LAMBS ~ILLED BY DOGS. ON MOTION OF ~R. KIRKSEY, SECONDED BY MR. PALMER, MR. EVANS WAS ALLOWED $18oO0 FOR EACH OF THE EWES AND ~10.00 FOR EACH OF THE LAMBS. ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR. PALMER, RULES WITH REGARD TO SECOND READ- ING WERE SUSPENDED AND THE FOLLOWING EESOLUTION UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ~OARD OF 0OUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE 0OUNTY, VIRGINIA, THAT ~25~,652.85 BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY APPROPRIATED TO COVER CURRENT EXPENSES IN CONNECTION WITH SCHOOL 0ONSTRUCTION. COMMUNI~ATION WAS RECEIVED FROM ~RS. E. H. ~AIN EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR THE RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THIS BOARD IN CONNECTION WITH HER:':VIRGtNIA~S ~OTHER OF THE YEAR AWARD. THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE PRESENTED COMMUNICATION FROM ~R. S. Do STURKZE REGARDING CHANGE PROPOSED FOR THE iNSTRUCTIVE VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION PROGRAM. THiS COMMUNICATION RE- qUESTED APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY OF THREE NEW NURS!ING POSITIONS IN THE ~OtNT HEALTH DEPARTMENT, EFFECTIVE dULY 1, 1966. IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE I.V.N.A. HAS BEEN RECEIVING U.G.F. SUPPORT BUT SAID AGENCY DID NOT WISH TO CONTINUE SUPPORTING ANY BODY OPERATING DIRECT COMPETITION WITH A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY. THEREFORE, THE BEDSIDE NURSING SERVICE WHIOH HAS BEEN FURNISHED BY IVNA WOULD BE TAKEN OVER BY THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT. AFTER DIS- CUSSION OF THIS MATTER~ APPROVAL WAS GIVEN TO SAME AND IT WAS DIRECTED THAT U.G.F. BE QUESTED TO CONTINUE SUPPORT OF THE ~.V.N,A.~ MOTION BEING MA~E BY MR. PALMER AND SECONDED BY MR. YANCEY. CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY AMOUNTING TO 81,o17,&90.63 WERE PRESENTED~ EXAMINED, AND ALLOWED AND CERTIFIED TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE FOR RAYMENT AND CHARGED TO THE FOLLOWING FUNDS: o¢~ F¢~ SCHOOL OPERATING FUND VIRGINIA PUBLIC ASSISTANCE FUN~ SOHOOL CONSTRUCTION FUND TEXTBOOK FUND CAFETERIAS CENTRAL FIRE DISTRICT FUND DOG TAX FUND 0OMMONWEALTH OF VA. CURRENT CREDIT ACCOUNT A8,828.50 229,605.63 30,750.34 336,694.42 853.2A 7~095.22 6.00 362~97A.23 TOTAL ~1,017.A90.63 ON MOTION~ THE MEETI.NG WAS ADdOURNED. CHA I RM~,N