Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-01-19 A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ VIRGINIA~ WAS HELD AT THE OFFICE BUILDING OF SAID COUNTY ON THE 19TH OF JANUARY~ PRESENT: MESSRS. F. Eo PAULETT~ EDGAR N. GARNETT~ GARRETT W. KIRKSEY~ GEORGE PALMER~ I!, ROBERT THRAVES AND Ro A. YANCEY. ABSENT: NONE. OFFICERS PRESENT: ASSISTANT COUNTY EXECUTIVE AND COMMONWEALTHtS ATTORNEY. THE MEETING OPENED WITH THE LORDtS PRAYER LED BY UR. OTIS L. BROWN. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF DECEMBER 17~ 1~6~ WERE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED. MR. PAULETT REVIEWED IN SOME DETAIL ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THIS BOARD DURING THE PAST CALENDAR YEAR. HE THEN NOMINATED MR. EDGAR GARNETT AS CHAIRMAN~ WHICH NOMINATION WAS SECONDED BY MR. THRAVES. ON MOTION OF MR. PALMER~ SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY~ IT WAS ORDERED THAT NOMINATIONS BE CLOSED° MRo GARNETT WAS UNANIMOUSLY ELECTED CHAIRMAN. MRo THRAVES NOMINATED MR. GEORGE C. PALMER AS ViCE-CHAIRMAN~ WHICH NOMINATION WAS SECONDED BY MR. YANCEY. ON MOTION OF MR. YANCEY~ SECONDED BY MR. PAULETT~ IT WAS ORDERED THAT NOMINATIONS BE CLOSED. MR. PALMER WAS UNANIMOUSLY ELECTED VICE-CHAIRMAN. MR° PALMER NOMINATED MRS. JUNE T° MOON AS CLERK~ WHICH NOMINATION WAS SECONDED BY MRo KIRKSEYo MRS. MOON WAS UNANIMOUSLY ELECTED CLERK. MR. BROWN~ ASST. COUNTY EXECUTIVE~ ADVISED THAT THE TERMS OF MESSRS. ARNOLD SMITH~ DAVE CARR~ CECIL UAUPIN AND NELSON BECK AS MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION EX- PIRED DECEMBER ~1~ 1~. IT WAS NOTED THAT MR. BECK WAS INELIGIBLE FOR REAPPOINTMENT TO THE FACT THAT HE HAD MOVED FROM ALBEMARLE COUNTY. UR. KIRKSEY NOMINATED MRo WILLIAM P. MOORE~ JRo TO SUCCEED MR. ARNOLD SMITH FROM THE CHARLOTTESVILLE ~ISTRICTo MR. PALMER NOMINATED MR. DAVE CARR TO CONTINUE FROM THE IVY DISTRICT. MR. GARNETT NOMINATED CECIL UAUPIN TO CONTINUE FROM THE WHITE HALL DISTRICT. ALL THREE OF THESE NOMINATIONS WERE SECONDED BY MR. ~HRAVES AND UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. UR. PAULETT ADVISED THAT HE WOULD NOMINATE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE SCOTTSVILLE D~STRICT AT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING. MR. BROWN ADVISED THAT THE TERMS OF THE PRESENT E~UALIZATION BOAR9 MEMBERS ~ ~R. RAY LONG~ MR. GOR~ON WHEELER AND COL. HENRY Bo GOODLOE - EXPIRED DECEMBER ~1~ 1~o IT ~AS NOTED THAT THE SERVICES OF SUCH BOARD WOULD BE RE~UIRE~ ~UITE ERE~UENTLY IN THE COMING YEAR AND THAT COL. GOODLOE WOULD BE OUT OF TOWN A GOOD PART OF THE COMING MONTHS. IT WAS FELT~ UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES THAT COL. GOODLOE SHOULD BE REPLACED ON SAID BOARD. THE CLERK WAS DIRECTED TO WRITE A LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO COL. GOODLOE FOR HIS PAST SERVICES AS A MEMBER OF THE EQUALIZATION BOARD. MR° YANCEY NOMINATED MR. DABNEY SANDRIDGE TO SUC- CEED COL. GOODLOE~ UR. KIRKSEY RECOMMENDED THAT MR. RAY LONG BE CONTINUED~ AND MR. THRAVES RECOMMENDED THAT MR. GORDON WHEELER BE CONTINUED. ON MOTION OF UR, KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY ~R. PAULETT~ AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED~ MR. DABNEY SANDRIDGE~ UR. RAY LONG AND MR° GORDON WHEELER WERE APPOINTED AS MEMBEI~S OF THE E~UALIZATION BOARD FOR THE YEAR ~[~R. PAULETT READ COMMUNICATION FROM MRS. ALLEN K, RANDOLPH IN WHICH SHE SUBMITTED HER RESIGNATION AB A MEMBER OF THE LIBRARY BOARD. ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY, SECONDED BY MR. PALMER, URS. RANDOLPHIS RESIGNATION WAS ACCEPTED WITH REGRET AND THE CLERK WAS DIRECTED TO WRITE MRS. RANDOLPH EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR HER SERVICES. MR. PAULETT NOMINATED MRS. DONALD CARROLL OF SCOTTSVILLE TO FILL THE UNEXPIRED TERM OF MRS. RANDOLPH ON THE LIBRARY BOARD, WHICH NOMINATION WAS SECONDED BY UR. KIRKSEY AND UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. (THIS TERM RUNS THROUGH dUNE 30, 1965.) UR. A. S. BROWN, RESIDENT HIGHWAY ENGINEER, APPEARED AND REQUESTED THE COUNTY'S CO- OPERATION IN REGARD TO RIGHTS OF WAY ON ROUTE 29. HE REQUESTED THAT HIS OFFICE BE ADVISE9 WHEN BUILDING PERMITS ARE OBTAINED FOR CONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 29~ PARTICULARLY SOUTH OF THE CITY. UR. BROWN WAS ASSURED THAT THiS WOULD BE DONE. COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGNWAYS ADVlSJNG THAT AS REQUESTED BY THIS BOARD IN RESOLUTION OF dUNE 18~ 1964~ THE FOLLOWING STREETS WERE ADDED TO THE SECONDARY S¥STEM~ EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 11, 1964= HESSIAN HILLS SUBDIVISION -. BARTERBROOK SEC.TION 2: INGLEWOOD DRIVE - FROM END OF PRESENT MAINTENANCE TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH SOLOMON ROAD - LENGTH 0°05 MILE. SOLOMON ROAD - FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH INGLEWOOD DRIVE IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH MEADOWS SUBDIVISION - LENGTH 0.1~ MILE. COMMUNIOATION WAS RECEIVED FROM ~R. dAMES CAHILL WITH FURTHER REGARD TO PREVIOUS REQUESTS FOR IMPROVEMENT TO ROUTE ~71. UR. A. S. BROWN ADVISED THAT THE STATE'S TRAFFIC COUNT HAD BEEN RE-CHECKED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT. HOWEVER~ HE PLANNED TO INCLUDE ALLOCATION IN THE NEXT BUDGET TO CORRECT DANGEROUS CONDITION-AT INTERSECTION OF ROUTES 671AN~ ~o MRo 0TlS BROWN WAS REQUESTED TO ACKNOWLE~E MR. CAHILL~S?~COMMUNICATIONo PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON SECTION 5~ HESSIAN HILLS SUBDIVISION~ AS PREPARED BY ~R. ~ILLIAM S. ROUDABUSH AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY AND CITY PLANNING COMMISSIONS. IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $11~54.00 HAD BEEN POSTED TO ASSURE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ON MOTION OF ~R. KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY UR. PAULETT~ THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED AND THE CHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOARD. PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON DIVISION OF LAND ON ROUTE 631 OWNED BY L. Lo AND BETTY LEAKE AS SURVEYED BY ~R. ~ILLIAM S. ROUDABUSH AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY AND CITY PLANNING COM- MISSIONS. ON MOTION OF UR. PAULETT~ SECONDED BY ~R. KIRKSEY~ THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED AND THE CHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF TH~$ BOARD. PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON LOTS 2A AND 2B, A DIVISION OF LOT 2 LOCATED ON ROUTE ~00 AND OWNED BY KENT UORRIS~ AS PREPARED BY MR. ~ILLIAM So ROUDAB~SH AND APPROVED BY TH/ COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. ON MOTION OF ~R. THRAVES~ SECONDED BY MR° YANCEY~ THIS PLAT WAS AP-- PROVED AND THE CHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BeA~D~ PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON PARCELS A AND B OF LOTS 42 AND 43A ON CORNWALL ROAD IN ~EST LEIGH SUBDlVlSION~ AS PREPARED BY UR. THOMAS Do BLUE AND APPROVED BY TH/ COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, ON MOTION OF HR~ KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY HR,'PAULETT~ THIS~PLAT WAS APPROVED AND THE CHAIRMAN AND.CLERK WERE ,AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF TH~S BOARD., PLAT WAS RECEIVED.ON SMALL.LOT ON RO.UTE 810 SURVEYED FOR S, C, AND R, S,¥ .' GARRISON.BY m~ W, SAUNDERS. AN~ APPRO.VED BY. THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, 0N MOTION OF MR, YANCEY~ SECONDED BY MR, THR. AVES~ THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED AND THE,CHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOARD, PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON 1.66 ACRES ON ROUTE 810 SURVEYED FOR 0, T. HENLEY~ OR,.BY WARREN F, WADE AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY PLANNING'COMMISSION, ON MOTION OF SECONDED'BY ~R, THRAVES~ THIS.PLAT WAS APPROVED AND THE CHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHO- RIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS BOARD, , COMMUNICATION ~AS RECEIVED FROM PAXSON~ HARSHALL AN~ S.MITH~ ATTORNEYS~ ENCLOSING INSTRUMENT OF.VACATION~ AS WELL AS PLAT~ OF ~0 FT, RIGHT OF WAY.ACROSS pROPERTY.OF ~R, HENRY 0AVOR KNOWN AS ~PANDORA FARMS~ AND REQUESTING CONSENT OF THIS BOARD TO THE VACATION OF SAID PLAT, ON MOTION OF HR, THRAVES~ SECONDED BY MRo YANCEY~ AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED~ THE ABOVE REQUEST WAS APPROVED AND THE CHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE INSTRUMENT OF VACATION ON'BEHALF OF THIS BOARD, ON MOTION OF HRo KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY HR, YANCEY~ AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED~ 0TIS BROWN WAS REQUESTED TO RECAP ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THE PAST CALENDAR YEAR, ~R, KIRKSEY STATED HE FELT THE PUBLIC WOULD BE INTERESTED IN SUCH INFORMATION, MR. KIRKSEY ADVISED THAT THERE WAS A STRONG POSSIBILITY*THAT THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE WOULD IMPOSE A LOCAL SALES TAX IN THE NEAR FUTURE WHICH WOULD BE VERY DETRIMENTAL TO THIS COUNTY AS WELL AS SURROUNDING COUNTIES, HE SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNTY OPPOSE SUCH SALES TAX AND THAT LETTERS GO FORWARD TO MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATURE WITH COPIES TO SURROUNDING COUNTIES SUGGESTING THAT THEY TAKE SIMILAR ACTION, ~l;t, PALMER SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD GO ON RECORD AS SUPPORTING THE LEAGUE OF VIRGINIA COUNT1ES~ STAND ON THE SALES TAX, HOWEVER~ MR, GEORGE LONG~ EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF THE LEAGUE OF VIRGINIA COUNTIES~ AFTER EXPLAINING IN SOME DETAIL THE [EAGUE~S POSITION IN THE MATTER~ STATED THAT PERHAPS THE BOARD'S ENDORSEMENT SHOULD BE MADE AFTER THE LEAGUERS PROGRAM MA~E PUBLIC, AFTER CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION~ MOTION WAS OFFERED BY ~Ro KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY HR, YANCEY~ AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED~ OPPOSING LOCAL SALES TAX AND DIRECTE~ THAT COM- MUNICATIONS BE A~DRE$SED TO;THE COUNTY'S REPRESENTATIVES IN THE LEGISLATURE IN THIS REGARD~ WITH COPIES TO SURROUNDING COUNTIES SUGGESTING THAT THEY TAKE SIMILAR ACTION, ON MOTION OF HRo PALMER~ SECONDED BY MR. THRAVES~ AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED~ THIS BOARD DOES HEREBY GO ON RECORD SUPPORTING GENERAL RETAIL SALES TAX PROGRAM iN SUPPORT OF BASIC EDUCATION IN THE STATE, AT ~0=00 A,H,~ THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CONTRACTORtS 0R~INANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NOTICE AND ORDINANCE PUBLISHED UNDER SECTION 15.1-§0~ OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA IN THE ~AILY PROGRESS ON DECEMBER 1~ DECEMBER ~1~ AND ~ECEMBER 196~, AND dANUARY 4, 1965, AND ALSO POSTED AT THE OOURT HOUSE AND ALL POST OFFICES IN ALBEMARLE OOUNTVo MR. BROWN SUMMARIZED THE CONTENTS OF ORDINANCE AS PROPOSED. HE ALSO. STATED THAT A REQUEST HAD BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWE~ OOMPANY FOR AN AMENDMENT WHICH ~ULD ASSURE THAT NO PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION ENGAGED IN FUR- NISHING ELECTRICITY TO THE PUBLIC WOULD BE DEEMED AN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR UNDER THIS. PROPOSED ORDINANCE, HOWEVER, THE COMMONWEALTHIS ATTORNEY ADVISED THAT THErWORDING OF THE ORDINANCE WAS SUFFICIENT TO EXCLUDE PUBLIC UTILITIES.- MR. dOE BIRCKHEAD, ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, EXPRESSED THE OPINION THAT MOST CONTRACTORS IN HIS FIELD WOULD WEECOME THIS ORDINANCE, PROVIDED PROVISIONS ARE INCLUDED FOR INSPECTION. HE WAS ADVISED THAT THE ORDINANCE AS PROPOSED IS A TAX MEASURE AND IS.NOT INTENDED TO BE REGULATORY. OOMMUNICA-- TION WAS PRESENTED BY BLUE RIDGE HOME BUILDING ASSOCIATION OPPOSING TAXON CONTRACTORS ON THE BASIS THAT IF CONTRACTORS ARE TAXED, ALL BUSINESSES SHOULD BE TAXED. MRo EDWARD VANLAER APPEARED IN FAVOR OF THE ORDINANCE, STATING THAT THE COUNTY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO KEEP REVENUE WHICH IS NOW GOING TO OTHER LOCALITIES. UPON CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING., SAID ORDINANCE WAS OFFERED FOR ADOPTION BY MR. KIRKSEY, SECONDED BY MR. PAULETT, AND ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE: AYES - MESSRSo GARNETT~ KIRKSEY, PALMER, PAULETT~ THRAVES AN9 YANCEY. ~NA¥$ - NONE. THE ORDINANCE FOLLOWS: AN ORDINANCETO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSING OF CONTRACTORS, ELECTRICAL CON- TRACTORS~ PLUMBERS~ STEAMFITTERS, AND SPECULATIVE BUILgERS, AND PUNISHMENT FOR FAILURE TO COI~PLY WITH SAME. SEC. 1. CONTRACTORS - DEFINED. EVERY PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION ACCEPTING OR OFFERING TO ACCEPT ORDERS OR CON- TRACTS FOR DOING ANY WORK ON OR IN ANY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, REQUIRING THE USE OF PAINT, STONE, BRICK, MORTAR~ CEMENT~ WOOD, FABRICATED OR MANUFACTURED FLOOR OR WALL COVERINGS~ STRUCTURAL IRON OR STEEL, SHEET IRON, GALVANIZED IRON, METALLIC PIPING, TIN~ LEAD OR OTHER METAL OR ANY BUILDING MATERIAL; OR ACCEPTING OR OFFERING TO ACCEPT ORDERS OR CONTRACTS TO ;DO ANY PAVING~ C~RBING OR OTHER WORK ON SIDEWALKS, STREETS, ALLEYS OR HIGH- WAYS~ PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY, REQUIRING T~E USE OF ASPHALT, BRICK, STONE~ CEMENT, WOOD OR ANY COMPOSITION; OR ACCEPTING OR OFFERING TO ACCEPT ORDERS OR CONTRACTS TO EXCAVATE EARTH, ROCK OR OTHER MATERIAL FOR FOUNDATIONS OR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR FOR CUTTING~ TRIMMING OR MAINTAINING RIGHT OF WAY; OR ACCEPTING OR OFFERING TO ACCEPT ORDERS FOR CON- TRACTS TO CONSTR~CT ANY SEWER OF STONE, BRICK~ CONCRETE~ TERRA COTTA, OR OTHER MATERIAL; OR ACCEPTING OR OFFERING TO ACCEPT ORDERS OR CONTRACTS TO CARE FOR PLOTS IN CEMETERIES; OR ACCEPTING OR OFFERING TO ACCEPT ORDERS OR CONTRACTS FOR BUILDING~ RE-MODELING~ RE- PAIRING~ WRECKING, RAZING OR DEMOLISHING ANY STRUCTURE~ OR FOR MOVING ANY BUILDING; OR FOR ~RILLING, BORING OR 91GGING A WELL; OR FOR THE INSTALLATION~ MAINTENANCE, OR REPAIR OF NEON SIGNS, OR AIR CONDITIONING APPARATUS OR EQUIPMENT; OR FOR FUMIGATION OR DISIN- FECTING TO PREVENT THE SPREAD OF DISEASE; OR FOR THE ERADICATION OR EXTEEMINATION OF RATS, MICE~ TERMITES~ VERMIN, OR INSECTS OR BUGS OF ANY KIND; SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A CONTRACTOR¢ WHETHER SUCH WORK IS DONE OR OFFERED TO BE DONE BY DAY LABOR, GENERAL CONTRACT OR SUB- CONTRACT~ PROVIDED, THAT NO PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION ENGAGING IN THE BUSINESS OF SELLING OR ERECTING TOMBSTONES SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A CONTRACTOR. SEC° 2..SAM~ -- AMOUNT OF ~ICENSE TAX. EVERY CONTRACTOR, WHOSE ANNUAL GROSS RECEIPTS ARE TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS OR GREATER, FOR THE PRIVILEGE OF TRANSACTING BUSINESS IN THIS COUNTY, INCLUDING THE PER- FORMANCE IN THE COUNTY OF A CONTRACT ACCEPTED OUTSIDE THIS COUNTY, SHALL PAY AN ANNUAL LICENSE TAX EQUAL TO TWENTY-~IVE DOLLARS (~5.00) AND WHERE THE GROSS RECEIPTS EXCEED TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS (~25,000o00) THE TAX SHALL BE FIFTEEN CENTS ($Oo15) ON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS (~100.00) IN ADDITION THERETO. SEC. 3. CONTRACTORtS LICENSE REQUIRED ~OR ELEC~RIClAN~o EVERY PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION ENGAGING IN THE BUSINESS OF ACCEPTING OR OFFERING TO ACCEPT ORDERS OR CONTRACTS FOR DOING ANY WORK ON OR IN ANY BUILDING OR PREMISES iNVOLVING ERECTING, INSTALLING, ALTERING, REPAIRING~ SERVICING OR MAINTAINING ELECTRIC WIRING~ DEVICES OR APPLIANCES PERMANENTLY CONNECTED TO SUCH WlRING; OR THE ERECTING.~ REPAIRING OR MAINTAINING OF LINES FOR THE TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRI.C LIGHT AND POWER, SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE A CONTRACTOR AS DEFINED IN THE PRECEDING SECTION, BUT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE AN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR AND SHALL PAY FOR THE PRIVILEGE OF CONDUCTING THE BUSINESS OF AN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR THE SAME LICENSE TAX AS THAT OF A CONTRACTOR~ WHICH SHALL BE COMPUTED IN THE SAME MANNER~ ON THE SAME BASIS~ AND AT THE SAME SCHEDULE OF RATES AS THE LICENSE TAX IMPOSED BY THIS SECTION UPON CONTRACTORS GENERALLY. SEC. ~. CONTRACTORIS LICENSE REQUIRED FOR PLUMBERS AND STEAMFITTERS. NO PERSON~ FIRM OR CORPORATION WHO ENGAGES IN THE BUSINESS OF A PLUMBER OR STEAMFITTER SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A CONTRACTOR AS DEFINED BY THIS ORDINANCE~ BY REASON OF OR WITH RESPECT TO THE CONDUCT OF THE BUSINESS OF PLUMBING OR STEAMFITTING; BUT EVERY SUCH PERSON SHALL PAY FOR THE PRIVILEGE OF CONDUCTING THE BUSINESS OF A PLUMBER OR STEAMFITTER A LICENSE TAX~ COMPUTED IN THE SAME MANNER~ ON THE SAME BASIS~ AND AT THE SAME SCHEDULE OF RATES~ AS THE LICENSE TAX IMPOSED BY THIS ORDINANCE UPON CON- TRACTORS GENERALLY. SEC. 5. AMOUNT OF LICENSE TAX FOR SPECUL,ATIVE BUILDERS~ BASIS FOR COMPUTATION. EVE'~'Y ~,ERSON~ FIRM, OR CORPORATION ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF ERECTING A BUILDING FOR THE PURPOSE OF SELLING OR RENTING IT AND MAKING NO CONTRACT WITH A DULY LICENSED CONTRACTOR FOR THE ERECTION OF SAID BUI~LD1NG~ WHETHER OR NOT SUCH PERSON CONTRACTS WITH ONE OR MORE DULY LICENSED CONTRACTORS FOR ONE OR MORE PORTIONS~ BUT ]~:)ES NOT CONTRACT WITH ANY ONE PERSON FOR ALL OF THE WORK OF ERECTING ANY ONE OF SUCH BUILDINGS~ SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A SPECULATIVE BUILDER~ AND~ WHERE THE ENTIRE COST OF ERECTING THE BUILDING OR BUILDINGS SHALL EXCEED TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS (~25~C)O0.00)~ FOR THE PRIVILEGE OF TRANSACTING BUSINESS IN THIS COUNTY SHALL PAY A LICENSE TAX E~UAL TO TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS' (~5.00) AND WHERE THE ENTIRE COST OF ERECTION OF SAID BUILDING OR BUILDINGS EXCEEDS TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS (~25,000.00), THE TAX SHALL BE FIFTEEN CENTS ($0.15) ON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100,00) IN ADDITION THERETO. IN COMPUTING THE COST OF ERECTING THE BUILDING~ THE VALUE OF THE LAND SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED~ BUT IT SHALL INCLUDE THE COST OF OFFSlTE IMPROVEMENTSt NAMELY~ WA~ER SYSTEMS~ SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEMS~ STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS WHEN SUCH SPECULATIVE BUILDER DOES NOT CONTRACT WITH A DULY LICENSED CONTRACTOR THEREFOR. No PERSON WHO IS DULY LICENSED AS A CONTRACTOR UNDER SECTION 2 OF THIS ORDINANCE AND WHO IS ALSO ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF SPECULATIVE BUILDING FOR WHICH A LICENSE TAX WOULD BE OTHERWISE PRESCRIBED BY THIS SECTION SHALL BE LIABLE FOR A SEPARATE LICENSE~ ASSESSABLE UNDER THIS SECTION~ BUT EVERY SUCH PERSON SHALL INCLUDE IN THE BASIS FOR THE TAX TO BE COMPUTED UNDER SECTION 2 ALL OF THE COSTS WHICH A SPECULATIVE BUILDER IS RE- ~UIRED TO INCLUDE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION~ WHICH COSTS SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS A PART OF THE ORDERS OR CONTRACTS ACCEPTED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN COMPUTING THE CON-- TRACTORIS LICENSE TAX. SEC~. ~. ~ESIGNATION OF PLACE OF BUSINESS. EVERY LICENSE OF A CONT~ACTOR~ ELECT~-ICAL CONTRACTOR~ PLUMBING OR STEAMFITTING CONTRACTOR~ BUILDING WRECKER, OR SPECULATIVE BUILDER SHALL DESIGNATE THE REGULAR OFFICE OR PLACE OF BUSINESS IN THE COUNTY~ IF THERE IS ONE~ AS THE SPECIFIED HO~$E OR DEFINITE PLACE AT WHICH THE BUSINESS IS TO BE CONDUCTED. . 1F THERE IS NO SUCH REGULAR OFFICE OR PLACE OF B~SINESS IN THE COUNTY~ BUT SUCH PERSON IS TRANSACTING BUSINESS IN THE COUNTY:~ THEN SUCH LICENSE SHALL DESIGNATE THE RESIDENCE OR PLACE OF BUSINESS OF THE TAXPAYER~ WHEREVER IT MAY BE~-AND ALSO THE FIRST PLACE IN THE COUNTY AT WHICH. WORK IS TO BE PER- FORMED AS THE. SPECIFIED HOUSE OR DEFINITE PLACE AT WHICH THE BUS,NESS IS TO BE CONDUCTED. SEC., ?. EXHIBITION, , OF, LICENSE, , ,PRERE~U-ISlTE,, .TO OBTAINING PERMIT! COUNTY CONTRACT AN~ SUBCONTRACT. EVERY CONTRACTOR~ ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR~ PLUMBER AND STEAMFtTTER~ BUIL~ING WRECKER~ OR SPECULATIVE BUILDER, WHO PROPOSES TO DO WORK IN THE COUNTY~ FOR WHICH A PERMIT MUST BE OBTA. INED~ OR CONTRACT LET BY A DEPARTMENT~ BUREAU'OR OFFICER OF THE CouhrTY~ SHALL UPON MAKING APPLICATION FOR SUCH PERMIT~ OR UPON THE AWARD OF SUCH CONTRACT~ EXHIBIT TO THE PROPER COUNTY OFFICIAL THE COUNTY LICENSE AUTHORIZING HIM TO ENGAGE IN THE BUSINESS FOR THE YEAR IN WHICH THE PERMIT IS APPLIED FOR~ OR IN WHICH SUCH CONTRACT IS AWA'RDE~ AND SHALL FURNISH TO THAT OFFICIAL A LIST OF HIS SUBCONTRACTORS. IF ANY OF SUCH SUB- CONTRACTS HAVE NOT BEEN CLOSED OR AWARDED'AT THE TIME OF APPLYt,NG FOR SUCH PERMIT OR AWARD OF SUCH CONTRACT~ HE SHALL FURNISH SUCH LIST IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY UPON AWARDING THE SUBCONTRACT OR CONTRACTS~ AND HE SHALL NOT ALLOW THE WORK UNDER ANY SUBCONTRACT TO PROCEED UNTIL THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE EXHIBITED TO HIM HIS COUNTY L-,ICENSE TO DO SUCH BUSINESS IN THE COUNTY FOR THE CURRENT.YEAR. SEC. ~o EXEMPTION GENERALLY WHEN ClTY~ TOWN OR COUNTY LICENSE PURCHASED E~SEWHER~; EXCEPTION. ~HEN A CONTRACTOR~ ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR~ PLUMBING OR STEAMFITT:ING CONTRACTOR, OR BUILDING WRECKER SHALL HAVE PAID A LOCAL LICENSE TAZ~'TO ANY CITY, TOWN OR COUNTY IN WHICH HIS PRINCIPAL OFFICE OR BRANCH' OFF*ICE.MAY BE LOCATE~ HE SHALL BE EXEMPT~FROM THE PAYMENT OF ADDITIONAL LICENSE TAX TO THIS COUNTY FOR CONDUCTING ANy SUCHBUS~NESS WITHIN- THE CONFINES. OF THIS COUNTY EXCEPT WHERE THE AMOUNT OF BUS,INESS DONE BY ANY SUCH PER$ON~ FIRM OR CORPORATION IN THIS COUNTY EXCEEDS THE SUM OF TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS (~5~OO0.00) tN ANY YEAR~ IN WHICH EVENT THE PERSON~SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE LICENSE TAX AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 2 OF THIS ORDINANCE~ AS WELL AS ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF THiS ORDINANCE. THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE SHALL HAVE THE POWER TO REQUIRE SUCH PERIODIC REPORTS AS HE MAY DEEM NECESSARY OF ALL PERSONS CLAIMING UNDER THIS SECTION. THE EXEMPTION' MENTIONED IN THIS SECTION SHALL NOT AFFECT IN ANY OTHER WAY THE REQUIRE- MENTS OF THIS ORDINANCE. S~qo 9°. DEDUCT.ION OF RECEIPTS TAXED BY ANOTHER CITY! TOWN OR COUNTY. IN COMPUTING THE :LICENSE TAX OF A CONTRACTOR~ ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, PLUMBING OR STEAMFITTING CONTRACTOR, BUILDING WRECKER OR SPECULATIVE BUILDER WHOSE PRINCIPAL OFFICE OR BRANCH OFFICE I$ LOCATED IN THE COUNTY~ THERE SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM THE BASIS OF TAXATION THE AMOUNT OF BUSINESS DONE IN ANY OTHER CITY~ TOWN OR COUNTY UPON WHICH A LOCAL LICENSE TAX HAS BEEN ASSESSED AS PROVIDED IN THE CODE OF VIRGINIA, SECTION 58-299, SEC. 10. GENERAL PROVISIONS. ' (A)' 0MIT+ED LICENSE"TAXES° IF THE DIRECTOR OF ~.INANCE ASCERTAINS THAT ANY PERSON HAS NOT BEEN ASSESSED WITH A LICENSE TAX WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN LEVIED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS LICENSE TAX ORDINANCE FOR ANY LICENSE TAX YEAR OF THE THREE LICENSE TAX YEARS LAST PRECEDING OR FOR THE THEN CURRENT LICENSE TAX YEAR~ IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE ~IRECTOR OF FINANCE TO ASSESS THE PERSON WITH THE PROPER-LICENSE TAX FOR THE YEaR OR YEARS OMITTED,' ADDING THERETO THE PENALTY AS SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH F OF THIS ORDINANCE. (B) DUE DATE. THE TAXES ON LICENSES ACCRUING UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE DUE AND PAYABLE ON OR BEFORE THE FIRST DAY OF dUNE OF EACH TAX YEAR, AND SHALL BE PAID BY THE PERSON OR FIRM AGAINST WHOM ASSESSED TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ON OR BEFORE THE FIRST DAY. OF JUNE. (~) TRANSFER. NO LICENSE ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE TRANS- FERRED FROM ANY PERSON~ FIRM OR CORPORATION TO ANOTHER PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION, EXCEPT FOR THE CONT.iNUATION OF THE SAME BUSINESS AT THE SAME LOCATION FOR WHICH THE L. ICENSE WAS ORIGINALLY ISSUED. (D) PRORATION. NO LICENSE GRANTE~ PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE PRO- RATED FOR THE UNEXPIRE~ PORTION OF THE LICENSE YEAR UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED. (F) BEGIN. I.G ,US ESS. FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASCERTAINING THE TAX TO BE PAID BY EVERY PERSON~ FIRM OR CORPORATION BEGINNING BUSINESS, THE LICENSE SHALL BE BASED ON THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF CONTRACTS ANTICIPATED TO BE MADE DURING THE BALANCE OF THE' LICENSE YEAR. EVERY UNDER- ESTIMATE OR OVERESTIMATE UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL BE SUBdECT TO CORRECTION BY THE ~IRECTOR OF FINANCE WHOSE D~TY IT SHALL BE TO REVIEW ALL ESTIMATED LICENSES AND ASSESS ANY ADDITIONAL LICENSES AS MAY BE FOUND TO BE DUE AFTER THE CLOSE OF THE LICENSE YEAR ON THE BASIS OF TOTAL AMOUNTS OF CONTRACTS AND ANY TAXPAYER WHO HAS OVERESTIMATED SHALL BE ENTITLED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOONT SO OVERESTIMATED. (F) PENALTy. ANY PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION CONDUCTING A B~SlNESS ~NDER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING S~CH LICENSE, SHALL BE S~BdECT TO A PENALTY OF FIVE PER CENTUM (5~) OF THE AMOUNT OF THE LICENSE TAX THEN DUE~ aUT SUCH PENALTY SHALL IN NO CASE BE LESS THAN TWO DOLLARS (~2.00)~ AND SUCH PENALTY SHALL BE ASSESSED AND PAID ALONG WITH THE LICENSE TAX AND SHALL BECOME A PART OF THE LICENSE TAX AND THERE SHALL BE COLLECTED INTEREST AT SlX PER CENTUM {~) PER ANNUM OF SAID TAX AND PENALTY ON WHICH SA'ID TAX BECOMES DELINQUENT~ AND SUCH PERSON~ FIRM OR CORPORATION SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR AND SHALL BE FINED NOT LESS THAN FIVE DOLLARS (~5,00) NOR MORE THAN ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS {~100.00) FOR EACH DAY HE IS IN DEFAULT. (G~) SEVERABILITY C~AUSEo tF ANY SECTION~ PHRASE, OR PART OF THIS ORDINANCE SHOULD, FOR ANY REASON, BE HELD INVALID BY A COURT OF COMPETENT d~RISDICTION~ SUCH DECISION SHALL NOT AFFECT THE REMAINDER OF THE ORDINANCE, AND EACH REMAINING SECTION, CLAOSE, OR PART THEREOF SHALL CONTINUE IN FULL. FORCE AND EFFECT. (H) EFFECTIVE THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE UPON ITS PASSAGE. IN ACCORDANCE ~ITH NOTICE PUBLISHED IN THE DAILY PROGRESS ON 0ANUARY ~ THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THIS BOARD ON DECEMBER 17, 1~, SIGNIFYING ITS INTENTION TO EXTEND THE dORISDICTIONAL AREA.OF THE ~LBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORIT?o AFTER DISCUSS.ION~.THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS OFFERED BY KIRKSEY, SECONDED BY MR. PALMER, AND ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE: A~ES: MESSRSo ~ARNETT, KIRKSEY, PALMER, PAULETT~ THRAVES AND YANCEYo NAYS: NONE. WHEREAS, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE E~)ARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE~COuNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD ON DECEMBER 17~ 196~, A RESOLUTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED BY RECORDED VOTE BY THE SAID BOARD~ SIGNIFYING THE INTENTION OF SAID BOARD TO EXTEND THE dURISDICTIONAL AREA OF THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY UNDER THE "VIRGINIA WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITIES ACT"~ AS AMENDED (CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950, SECTION 15.1-1239 TO SECTION 15.1-1255, INCLUSIVE); AND ~EREAS, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 15o1-1239 THROUGH SECTION 1~1-1255, CODE oF VIRGINIA, 1950, AS AMENDED~ TH/ AFORESAID RESOLUTION WAS DULY PUBLISHED IN FULL ON JANUARY ~, 1965~ IN THE ~DAILY PROGRESS~, A NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED IN AND HAVING GENERAL CIRCULATION IN THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE~ VlRGINIA~ ALONG WITH A NOTICE THAT A PUBLIC HEARING ON SAID RESOLUTION WOULD BE HELD BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA~ ON THE 19TH DAY OF JAN~ARY~ IN THE BOARD ROOM, COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING, CHARLOTTESVlLLE~ VIRGINIA~ THAT DATE BEING MORE THAN TEN DAYS AFTER THE AFORESAID P~BLICATION OF THE SAID NOTICE AND SAID RESOLUTION; AND WHEREAS, THE SAID PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD ON JANUARY 19TH, 1965~ AT THE TIME AND PLACE SET FORTH IN THE SAID NOTICE AND SAID RESOLUTION; AND WHEREAS, NO ONE FROM THE PUBLIC APPEARED IN THIS REGARD AND IT APPARENT TO THIS BOARD THAT NO OPPOSITION IS OFFICIALLY IN EVIDENCE; NO~, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ VIRGINIA, DOTH HEREBY RATIFY AND CONFIRM ITS ACTION TAKEN AT REGULAR MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 1~, 1~, IN ADOPTING BY RECORDED VOTE THE RESOLUTION SIGNIFYING ITS INTENTION TO EXTEND THE dURISDICTIONAL AREA OF THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY. ~R. ARMoNDE PAXSON APPEARED ON BEHALF OF MR. ~o M. PENCE. HE ADVISED THE BOARD THAT ~R. PENCE HAD BEEN VISITED BY UR. FORREST PAULETT DURING HIS RECENT ABSENCE FROM THE OFFICE AND WAS REQUESTED ~O TAKE A THREE MONTHS LEAVE OF ABSENCE DURING WHICH TIME IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT HE LOOK FOR OTHER MEANS OF GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT. ~R. PAXSON STATED THAT IT WAS ~R. PENCEtS DESIRE TO KNOW ~HETHER THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS DUTIES ~NSATISFACTORY. ~R. PAULETT STATED THAT HE FELT ~Ro PENCE HAD alSUNDERSTOOD HIM. HE STATED THAT THE BOARD HAD THE HIGHEST REGARD ~OR MR. PENCE BUT THEY ~ERE CON- CERNED ABOUT HIS PHYSICAL CONDITION ~l~r HAD BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL IN THEIR EFFORTS*~O CON- FER_WITH HIS PHYSICIAN. AFTER A SHORT DISCUSStON~ THE BOARD ADdOURNED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH ~Ro PAXSONo UPON REGONVENING, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS OFFERED BY ~Ro PALMER~ SECQNDED BY ~R. THRAVES, AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: I~EREAS~ MR, MAUPIN PENCE HAS SERVED ALBEMARLE COUNTY AS COUNTY EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR OF FINANCE FOR THE LAST TWELVE YEARS IN THE MOST DEDICATED AND EFFICIENT MANNER; AND ~'IEREAS~ HE HAS LABORED LONG HOURS~ DAY AND NIGHT~ AND OVER WEEKENDS~ FAR BEYOND THE CALL OF DUTY; AND ~HEREAS~ IT IS THE BELIEF OF THE MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS THAT NO ONE CAN CONTINUE TO FUNCTION AT THE RATE HE HAS IN RECENT YEARS WITHOUT IMPAIRMENT TO MIS HEALTH AND WELL BEING; THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED: THAT ~R, PENCE BE GIVEN A LEAVE OF ABSENCE FOR THREE MONTHS WITH FULL PAY AND WiTH THE SINCERE HOPE THAT HE MAY FULLY ENdOY THIS WELL DESERVED REST. MEMBERS OF THE SCHOOL BOARD AND REPRESENTATIVES OF THE VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY MET WITH THE BOARD CONCERNING ELECTRIC RATES. MR. WALTER SALLEY~ CHAIRMAN OF THE SCHOOL BOARD~ STATED THAT SCHOOLS IN THE CITY PAY ONE-HALF THE AMOUNT PAID BY THE COUNTY ALTHOUGH IN ONE PARTICULAR CASE, A CITY AND COUNTY SCHOOL ARE WITHIN ONE BLOCK OF ONE ANOTHER. HE SUGGESTED THAT A RATE STUDY BE MADE TO DETERMINE IF EQUITABLE RATES ARE BEING CHARGED, MR. IVAN HALL OF THE VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY DESCRIBED THE RATE STRUCTURE OF THE POWER COMPANY WHEREBY COUNTIES ARE CLASSIFIED DIFFERENTLY FROM CITIES AND TOWNS THROUGHOUT THE STATE. AFTER LENGTHY DISCUSSION OF THIS MATTER~ MOTION WAS OFFERED BY MR. KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR, PALMER~ AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED~ DIRECTING THE ASSISTANT COMFY EXECUTIVE TO WRITE THE VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY REQUESTING A REVIEW OF ITS RATE CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE. STATEMENTS OF EXPENSES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE~ THE SHERiFF1S OFFICE AND THE OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTHIS ATTORNEY WERE PRESENTED FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER~ 196~o ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR, PALMER~ THESE STATEMENTS WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. STATEMENT OF EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THE COUNTY dAIL WAS SUBMITTED ALONG WITH SUMMARY STATEMENT OF PRISONER DAYS FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER~ 196~. ON MOTION OF MR. YANCEY~ SECONDED BY MR. THRAVES~ THESE STATEMENTS WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. REPORTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PBBLtC WELFARE WERE PRESENTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 63-~?ol AND 63~?.2 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA~ AND ON MOTION OF MR° ~iRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR. YANCEYy WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. CLAIM OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HOSPITAL IN THE AMOUNT OF $117.21 FOR THE HOSPITALIZATION OF INDIGENT PATIENTS WAS PRESENTED AND ON MOTION OF ~R. PALMER~ SECONDED BY ~R. KIRKSEY~ WAS APPROVED FOR PAYMENT, REPORT OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE FOR THE MONTH OE DECEMBER~ 1~ WAS PRESENTED~ AND ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY ~R. YANCEY~ WAS ACCEPTED AND ORDERED'FILE~. COPY OF COMMUNICATION ADDRESSED TO MR. dAMES BOWEN~ CITY MANAGER~ FROM T~HE AIR- PORT COMMISSION WAS PRESENTED IN WHICH CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED A~~ THE dOINT AIRPORT WERE DISCUSSED, THE BOARD WAS ADVISED THAT THE AIRPORT OOMMISSION INTENDED TO PREPARE A PRIORITY LIST OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS WHICH WOULD BE SUBMITTED AT A LATER DATE. MRo BROWN ADVISED THAT COUNTY AUTOMOBILE LICENSES WOULD SOON HAVE TO BE PURCHASED AND INQUIRED IF THE BOARD WISHED TO CONTINUE THE USE OF STICKERS. MR, PAULETT STATED HE WOULD PBEFER THE USE OF METAL TAGS. HOWEVER~ IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT IT IS DIFFICULT TO MR, INSTALL METAL TAGS ON MANY NEW MODEL CARS. /PALMER SUGGESTED THAT IF STICKERS ARE CON- TINUED~ NEW ONES BE ISSUED FOR TRAN~R~ SINCE SOME STICKERS HA'VE BEEN FOUN~ TO BE ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO APPLY AFTER REMOVAL. HE ALSO SUGGESTED THAT DEALERS BE SUPPLIED WITH APPLI- CATIONS FOR TRANSFER. MR. KIRKSE¥ SECONDED ~R. PALMERtS SUGGESTION AND THIS MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. AT 1:30 P.M. MEMeERS OF CITY COUNCIL MET WITH THE'BoARD, MR. LOUIE L, SCRIBNER SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING REPORT= "YOUR ~OINT COMMITTEE RELATIVE TO A NEW LIBRARY BUILDING REPORTS AS FOLLOWS. THE CITY, AS AGREED AT THE dOINT MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BODIES OF THE CITY AND COUNTY ON DECEMBER 11~ 1964~ FILED AN APPLICATION WITH TH/ VIRGINIA STATE LIBRARY BOARD FOR ~ FEDERAL GRANT TO PAY 4~ OF THE COST OF A NEW LIBRARY BUILDING TO BE LOCATED ON GORDON AVENUE~ BETWEEN I~TH & I~TH STREETSt ON LAND DONATED TO THE CITY BY THE PERRY FOUNDATION. THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE BUILDING~ EQUIPMENT~ ARCHITECT FEES~ [TC,, IS $267,250.00~ THE FEDERAL SHARE TO BE $120,262.00 AND THE LOCAL SHARE TO BE $146,988.00. YOUR COMMITTEE BELIEVES THAT A BETTER AND MORE ECONOMICAL LIBRARY SERVICE CAN BE RENDERED TO THE CITIZENS OF ALBEMARLE AND CHARLOTTESVILLE BY THE CONTINUED dOtNT OPERATION OF THE LIBRARY FAOILITIES~ AND SINCE THE PRESENT BUILDING IS NOT OF S~FFICIENT SIZE AND IS NOT DESIGNED TO SERVE OUR GROWING COMMUNITY~ AND IS NOT DESIGNED TO SERVE AS A BASE FOR THE EXPANDING BOOKMOBILE SERVICE~ YOUR COMMITTEE UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS AS FOLLOWS~ CONTINGENT UPON THE APPLICATION TO THE STATE LIBRARY BOARD FOR FUNDS BEING APPROVED: 1. THAT THE COUNTY AND CITY dOINTLY CONSTRUCT THE ADDI,TIONAL LIBRARY BUILDING WHICH IS DESIGNED FOR BOTH WALK-IN--DRIVE--IN AND BOOKMOBILE SERVlCE~ AND ~, THAT THE LOCALITIES SHARE OF THE COST BE E~UALLY DIVIDED BETWEEN_ THE COUNTY AND CITY~ AND THAT THE CITY LEASE TO THE COUNTY ONE-HALF INTEREST IN THE TRACT OF LAND WHICH IS TO BE USED AS *THE LIBRARY SITE~ AND THAT THE PRESENT dOINT COMMITTEE BE CONTINUED AND AUTHORIZED TO APPROVE FINAL PLANB~ SECURE BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW FACILITY~ AND TO-RECOMMEND TO YOU THE ACCEPTANCE OF A SATISFACTORY BID FOR THE WORK." RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED~ LOUIE L. SCRIBNER FORREST E. PAULETT LINDSAY B. MOUNT R. A. YA~CEY BERNARD ~o'HAGGERTY GARRETT ~. KIRKSEY CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WAS GIVEN THIS MATTER~ PARTICULARLY WiTH REGARD TO THE LAND ON WHICH THE PROPOSED LIBRARY IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED~ WHICH LAND WAS DONATED TO THE.CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE. AFTER DISCUSSIONy MOTION WAS OFFERED BY MR. PAULETT~.SECONDED BY ~R. KIRKSEY~ AND ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE: AYES - MESSRS, GARNETT~ KIRKSE¥~ PAULETT~ ~ALMER AND YANCEY, ABSENT - MR. THRAVESo (IT WAS NOTED THAT ~R. THRAVES INDICATED APPROVAL OF SAID REPORT BEFORE LEAVING THE MEETING.) MOTION= THAT THE REPORT OF THE dOINT LIBRARY COMMITTEE BE ACCEPTED AND ATTORNEYS BE REQUESTED TO DRAW UP AGREE- MENT TO BE PRESENTED AT A LATER MEETING. MR. BROWN CALLED THE BOARDt$ ATTENTION TO TWO CHECKS ISSUED~;NOVEMBER 19~ 1964~ FOR ELECTION ROOM RENT WHICH' WERE DRAWN TO INCORRECT PAYEES ON BASIS OF 'INFORMATION CER- TIFIED TO HIS OFFICE FOR PAYMENT BY THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT. ON MOTION OF MRo KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MRo YANCEY~ IT WAS ORDERED THAT THESE CHECKS BE CANCELLED AS FOLLOWS: ' NO. 7213 PAYABLE TO MARION L. SMITH AMOUNT - $5°00. NO. 7149 PAYABLE TO L. B. DAVIS. AMOUNT - $5.00. REPORT OF THE $. P. C. A. FOR THE MONTH O~ DECEMBER~ 1964~ WAS RECEIVED AND FILED. MR. BROWN ADVISED THAT FEBRUARY 14 WAS RENEWAL DATE ON THE COUNTYtS GROUP HOSPITALI- ZATION AND LIFE POLICY AND THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A PROPOSAL FROM ANOTHER COMPANY INTERESTED IN CARRYING THE COUNTY'S GROUP INSURANCE. MR, BROWN SUGGESTED THAT THIS MATTER BE REFERRED TO AN INSURANCE COMMITTEE WITH AUTHORITY TO ACT. ON MOTION OF MR. PA~MER~ SECONDED BY MR. YANCEY~ IT WAS ORDERED THAT THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO A COMMITTEE EMPOWERED TO ACT~ HOWEWER~ IF SUCH COMMITTEE FELT BOARD ACTION NECESSARY~ IT WAS INDICATED THAT A SPECIAL MEETING COULD BE CALLED PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 14. MR. GARNETT APPOINTED MR, KIRKSEY~ MR. PALMER AND MR~ BROWN TO SERVE ON THE INSURANCE COMMITTEE. COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM. THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ADVISING THAT THE BY-LAws OF THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION SPECIFY THAT AN ANNUAL MEETING BE HELD ON THE FOURTH WEDNESDAY OF EACH JANUARY~ AT WHICH TIME REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE COUNTY~ CITY~ UNIVERSITY AND THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ARE NAMED. IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE FOLLOWING PERSONS NOW REPRESENT THE COUNTY ON THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION: FLOYD [. JOHNSON~ GARRETT ~. KIRKSEY~ GEORGE. C. PALMER~ JOHN B. ROGAN~ WILLIAM B. TREVlLLIAN AND W. WRIGHT HARRISON. MR. PALMER SUGGESTED THAT SINCE MR. PAULETT ~AD EXPRESSED A DESIRE TO SERVE ON SAID 0OMMISStON~ THAT HE BE RE- PLACED BY MR. PAULET~ WHICH SUGGESTION WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD. IT WAS THE EXPRESSED FEELING OF THE BOARD THAT SINCE MR. PAULETT WOULD BE REPRESENTING THE SCOTTSVlLLE AREA OF THE COUNTY~ THAT A REPRESENTATIVE BE APPOINTED FROM THE WHITE HALL-SAMUEL MILLER AREA TO REPLACE MR. FLOYD JOHNSON. MR. YANCEY AND MR. GARNETT APPOINTED MR. E. H. BAIN TO REPLACE MR. JOHNSON AND IT WAS DIRECTED THAT THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION BE ADVISED OF THESE CHANGES PRIOR TO JANUARY 28. ON MOTION OF ~R. YANCEY~ SECONDED BY MR. PALMER~ THE CLERK WAS REQUESTED TO WRITE A LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO ~R. FLOYD JOHNSON FOR HIS SERVICES ON THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION. MR. BROWN ADVISED THAT RE~EST HAD BEEN RECEIVED FOR AN EXTENSION OF APPROXIMATELY 1~0OO FEET OF THE WATER LINE ON PARK ROAD IN THE CROZ/T SANITARY DISTRICT. HE STATED THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS WOULD PURCHASE THE NECESSARY MATERIAL SPECIFIED BY THE DISTRICT AND THAT DISTRICT PERSONNEL WOULD INSTALL SUCH LINE. ON MOTION OF MR. PALMER~ SECONDED BY ~R. YANCEY~ AND UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED~ THIS REQUEST WAS APPROVED. ANNUAL REPORT OF JAMES R. BUTLER~ NEGRO COUNTY AGENT~ WAS RECEIVED AND FILED. THE REPORT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 'SERVlCE~ WHICH WAS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD AT THE DECEMBER MEETING, WAS GIVEN SOME DISCUSSION AND ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY, SECONDED BY MR. PALMER, AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED, WAS ACCEPTED. ALSO, THE CHAIRMAN WAS REQUESTED TO APPOINT A COMMITTEE TO WORK WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER IN PREPARING A TIME TABLE FOR PROPOSALS OUTLINED IN SUCH REPORT. MR. G'ARNETT APPOINTED MR. PALMER~ MR. PAULETT AND t~R. KIRKSEY TO SERVE ON THIS COMMITTEE WITH MR. 0TIS BROWN. MR. BROWN WAS ALSO REQUESTED TO OBTAIN FROM THE ARCHITECT COSTS ON INSTALLING VAULT IN THE DEPART- MENT OF FINANCE AND ON PETITIONING THE OLD CITY CLERKIS OFFICE FOR USE OF THE COUNTY EXECUT IVE~S OFFICE. MR. BROWN CALLED THE BOARDIS ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT ADDITIONAL FUNDS WOULD BE NECESSARY FOR THE SERVICE AUTHORITY AND ESTIMATED THE AMOUNT NEEDED TO BE ~10,000.00o ON MOTION CE MR. PALMER~ SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY, RULES WITH REGARD TO SECOND REA~ING WERE SUSPENDED AND THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION ~NANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, THAT ~10,000.00 BE AND THE SAME IS REREB¥ A~PROPRIATED FROM GENERAL OPERATING FUND SURPLUS TO THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY ON A TEMPORARY LOAN BASIS. CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY AMOUNTING TO $495,320.93 WERE PRESENTED, EXAMINED, AND ALLOWED AND CERTIFIED TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE FOR PAYMENT AND CHARGED AGAINST THE FOLLOWING FUNDS GENERAL-REVENUE FUND GENERAL 0PERATING FUND SCHOOL 0PERATING FUND VIRGINIA PUBLIC ASSISTANCE FUND PUPIL SCHOLARSHIP FUND SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION FUND CAFETERIA FUND DOG TAX FUND CROZET SANITARY DISTRICT FuND CENTRAL FIRE DISTRICT FUND ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CURRENT CREDIT ACCOUNT i3.32 49,474.99 244,510.80 24,440.84 137, 50 25 ~ 936.39 588.39 4,466.8Z~ 14.1'3 ?,412;07 134~692.15 TOTAL $ 495,320.93 ON MOTION THE MEETING WA8 ADdOURNED. CNA I RMAN