Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-11-18 A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF CO~TY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, WAS HELD AT THE OFFICE BUILDING OF SAID COUNTY ON THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER~ 1965o PRESENT: MESSR8. EDGAR N. GARNETT~ GARRETT Wo KIRKSEY~ GEORGE Co PALMER, II, Fo E. PAULETT AND ROBERT THRAVES. ABSENT: MR. R. A. YANCEY. OFFICERS PRESENT= COUNTY EXECUTIVE, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT AND COMMONWEALTHIS ATTORNEY. THE MEETING OPENED WITH THE LORD!S PRAYER LED BY ~¥~R. GARNETT. MINUTES OF THE MEETINGS OF OCTOBER 21 AND NOVEMBER ~'9~ 1965, WEBE AEERO~ED AS SUB- MITTED. COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MRo L. H. NAYLOR WITH REGARD TO ROUTE 7~6 THROUGH HIS PROPERTY AND ROUTE 20. AFTER DISCUSSION, IT WAS ORDERED THAT THIS COMMUNICATION BE ACKNOWLEDGED AND REFERRED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS FOR CONSIDERATION. COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ADVISING THAT ~N ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION OF THIS BOARD DATED AUGUST 19~ 1965~ THE FOLLOWING ADDITION TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM WAS APPROVED~ EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 25~ ~OAD~'?BEGINNING AT A POINT ON ROUTE 6~-~-~ ..-~'rr~..__- ~ . - 0.~5 MILE WEST OF ROUTE 29 AN~ THENCE SOUTH AN~ SOUTHWEST FOR A DIS- TANCE OF O.50 MILE TO DEAD END - LENGTH 0,50 MILE. PLAT WAS RECEIVED ON TREMONT PARK SUBDIVISION AS PREPARED BY THOMAS Do ~LUE AND A~PROVED BY THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION° ON MOTION OF ~Ro PAULETT~ SECONDED BY KIRKSEY~ THiS PLAT WAS APPROVED, SUBdECT TO POSTING WITH THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT BOND IN TH/ AMOUNT OF ~19~800.00 AND THE CHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BE- HALF OF THIS BOARD° THE FOLLOWING PLATS WERE ALSO PRESENTED: (1) SUBDIVISION OF 231.9 ACRES ON ROUTE 658 DESCRIBED AS CARTE TRACT, AS PREPARED BY AMOS Ro SWEET AND APPROVED BY THE CITY AND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONS. (2) TRACTS A AND B, A DIVISION OF ~06.4 ACRES BELONGING TO HUNTER H. ~ARTH ON ROUTE 676, AS PREPARED BY AMOS R. SWEET AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. (3) LOTS 1 AND 2~ A DIVISION OF FRANCIS W. KNIGHT PROPERTY ON ROUTE 250, PREPARED BY AUBREY HUFFM[N AND APPROVED BY THE CITY AND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONS. (4) DIVISION OF PHILLIP WOOD PROPERTY ON ROUTE 620 NEAR SLATE MILL~ PREPARED BY WILLIAM S. ROUDABUSH AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. (5) PARCELS 1 AND 2, A DIVISION OF RUSSELL AND LUCILLE BATTEN PROPERTY ON ROUTE PREPARED BY WILLIAM S. RoUDABUSH AND APPROVED BY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY, SECONDED BY MRo PAULETT, THE FOREGOING PLATS WERE AP- PROVED AND THE CHAIRMAN AND CLERK WERE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN SAME ON BEHALF OF THIS E~)ARD. PE~TT~ON WAS PRESENTED BY MRS. CLARAW. ELLtOTT REGARDING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ON WHITE HALL ROAD (ROUTE 810) tN CROZET~ VIRGINIA. THE PETITION CITED THE E~CESSIVE SPEEDS IN THIS ZONE WHICH IS MARKED FOR 25 MILES PER HOUR, MRS° ELLIOTT ADVISED THAT SHE HAD CONTA~ED BOTH THE SHERiFFIS OFFICE AND THE STATE POLICE AND HAD RECEIVED NO SATiSFACTiON FROM EITHER SOURCE. AFTER CONSIDERATION OF THIS MATTER~ THE SAME WAS REFERRED TO THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE FOR INVESTIGATION WITH THE SHERIFFIS OFFICE AND THE STATE POLICE~ REPORT TO BE MADE TO THIS BOARD AT ITS NEXT REGULAR MEETING. ~N ACCORDANCE WITH ACTION TAKEN AT THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 9~' THE ~UNTING ORDINANCE WAS PROPOSED FOR PERMANENT ADOPTION AND ON MOTION OF MR. PAULETT~ SECONDED BY MR. KiRKSEY~ ~0=00 A.M. ON DECEMBER ~6~ 19~ WAS SET AS THE TIME FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON SAME AND THE CLERK WAS DIRECTED TO GIVE NOTICE OF SAME IN ACCORDANCE WiTH LAW. STATEMENTS OF EXPENSES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE~ THE SHERIFFIS OFFICE AND THE OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH'S ATTeRNEY WERE PRESENTED FOR THE MONTH OF 0CTOBER~ 19~. ON MOTION OF ~R. PALMER~ SECONDED BY MRo KIRKSEY~ THESE STATEMENTS WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED, STATEMENT OF EXPENSES iNCURRED IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THE COUNTY ~AIL WAS SUBMITTED ALONG WITH SUMMARY STATEMENT OF PRISONER DAYS ~OR THE MONTH OF 0CTOBER~ ~96~. ON MOTION OF MR, PAULETT~ SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY~ THE~SE STATEMENTS WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. REPORTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ~ELFARE FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER~ ~c~ WERE PRESENTED IN ACCORDANCE WiTH SECTIONS ~3-~?.1 AND 53-~?.2 OF THE ~ODE OF VIRGINIA AND WERE ORDERED FILED. THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ADVISED THAT ~R, STURKIE HAD APPROACHED HIM WITH REGARD TO CERTIFYING SLH CASES WHICH HAVE PREVIOUSLY BEEN CERTIFIED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE. THIS MATTER WAS REFERRED TO THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE FOR R/COMMENDATiON AT THE DECEM- BER BOARD MEETING, ~EPORT Of THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE FOR THE MONTH OF 0CTOBER~ 19~ WAS PRESENTED AND ORDERED FILED. COMMUNICATION FROM THE EARLYSVtLLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY WAS PRESENTED BY ~AMES Eo CRAIG~ REQUESTING THE ~)ARD OF SUPERVISORS TO DONATE TO SAID COMPANY THE FIRE TRUCK NOW OWNED BY THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE WHICH IS EXPECTED TO BE REPLACE~ IN THE NEAR FUTURE. THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ADVISED THAT A NEW TRUCK WOULD BE ORDERED SHORTLY BUT LIVERY WOULD NOT BE MADE FOR APPROXIMATELY FOUR MONTHS, MRo CRAIG ADVISED THAT SINCE THEY DiD NOT EXPECT TO HAVE THEIR FACILITIES COMPLETED UNTIL AROUND ~UNE ~ 1~ THIS ARRANGEMENT WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE. ON MOTION OF MR, THRAVES~ SECONDED BY ~R, KIRKSEY~ AN~ UNANIMOUSLY CARRtED~ THE REQUEST OF THE EARLYSVILLE VOLUNTEER FiRE COMPANY WAS GRANTED. AS REQUESTED AT THE LAST MEETING~ THE COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY REPORTED ON THE POISON IN A STREAM AT GREENWOOD. HE ADVISED THAT NO CRIMINAL ACTION WAS EVIDENT~ THAT AN EMPLOYEE SPILLED POISON ON THE FLOOR OF THE COCKERILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY AND WASHED SAME DOWN THE FLOOR DRAIN TO PREVENT THE EMPLOYER FROM DISCOVERING- THE LOSS. HE STATED THAT MR. COCKERiLLE HAD TAKEN STEPS TO PREVENT THE REOCCURANCE OF SUCH AN INCIDENT AND WAS MAKING PAYMENT FOR THE LOSS OF ALL LIVESTOCK IN THE RECENT INCIDENT. COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MR. Jo TEVIS MICHIE SUBMITTING HIS RESIGNATION AS A MEMBER OF THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVtCE AUTHORITY. THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ADVISED THAT MR. MICHIE HAD DONE AN EXCELLENT dOB FOR THE AUTHORITY AND HIS SERVICES WOULD BE GREATLY MISSED. ON MOTION OF MR. PALMER, SECONDED BY MR. KIRKSEY, THE RESIGNATION OF MR. MI~HiE WAS ACCEPTED WITH REGRET AND IT WAS ORDERED THAT A LETTER OF APPRECIATION BE FORWARDED TO MR. MICHIE. AT 10=O0 A.M. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CURFEW ORDINANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NOTICE PUBLISHED IN THE DAILY PROGRESS ON NOVEMBER 5 AND NOVEMBER 12~ 1965, THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE READ THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AND THE COMMONWEALTH]S ATTORNEY RECOMMENDED ITS PASSAGE AS A PREVENTIVE MEASURE. SEVERAL PERSONS FROM THE PUBLIC~ INCLUDING MRS. Co M. GARNETT, JR. AND MR. GUY VIA, EXPRESSED DOUBTS WITH REGARD TO ENFORCEMENT OF SUCH A LAW AND STATED THEY WERE OPPOSED TO ITS ADOPTION. ]T WAS THE EXPRESSED FEELING OF THE BOARD THAT THE COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY SHOULD BE BACKED IN THIS REQUEST. ON MOTION OF MR. PALMER~ SECONDED BY MR o PAULETT, SAID ORDINANCE WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED AS FOLLOWS= AN ORD I NANCE PROH t B I T I NG PERSONS UNDER E ! GHTEEN YEARS OF AGE FROM DR I V I NG OR RIDING IN VEHICLES BETWEEN THE HOUBS OF 1~00 A.M. AND 5tOOtA,Mo, WITH OERTAIN EXCEPTIONS, AND DEFINING THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF OWNERS OF VEHIOLES~, A~ PARENTS~ GUARDIANS AND OTHER ADULTS IN OHARGE OF SUOH PERSONS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, THAT= SECTION 1. HOURS OF CURFEW. ~T SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN YEARS TO DRIVEl RIDE IN OR OCCUPY ANY MOTOR VEHICLE~ ON ANY PUBLIC STREET OR HIGHWAY OR ANY OTHER PUBLIC PROPERTY OR PUBLIC PLACE OR ON ANY PRIVATE PROPERTY NOT OWNED BY OR UNDER THE CONTROL OF SUCH PERSON OR HIS PARENT, GUARDIAN OR OTHER ADULT HAVING~tTHE CARE OR CUSTODY OF SUCH PERSON, BETWEEN THE HOURS OF I =O0 A.M. AND 5=00 AcM. SECTION 2. EXCEPTIONS. THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION I OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE WHO IS AOOOMPANIE~ BY HIS PARENT, GUARDIAN OR OTHER ADULT HAVING THE CARE OR CUSTODY OF SUCH PERSON~ OR WHEN SUCH PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE IS UPON LEGITIMATE BUSINESS APPROVED BY WRITTEN PERMISSION OF HIS PARENT, GUARDIAN OR OTHER ADULT HAVING THE CARE OR CUSTODY OF SUCH PERSON. SECTION ~. RESPONSIBILITIES OF OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF VEHICLES. IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF ANY MOTOR VEHICLE TO KNOWINGLY PERMIT A VIOLATION OF SECTION I OF THIS ORDINANCE. SECTION ~. RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARENTS~ GUARDt.~NS~ ETC. ~T SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PARENT~ GUARDIAN~ OR OTHER ADULT HAVING THE CARE OR CUSTODY OF ANY PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN YEARS TO PERMIT ANY PERSON TO VIOLATE ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE. SECTION 5~ PENALTY. ANY PERSON WHO SHALL VIOLATE ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE PUNISHED BY A FINE OF NOT MORE THAN THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS (~300,00)~ OR BY IMPRISONMENT IN THE COUNTY dAIL FOR NOT MORE THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS~ OR BY BOTH SUCH FINE AND IMPRISONMENT. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE EFFECTIVE ON AND AFTER dANUARY 2~ MR. LLOYD SMITH~ ATTORNEY~ APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE S.P.C.Ao AND REQUESTED THAT EXISTING CONTRACT BE AMENDED TO INCREASE THE PER DIEM CHARGE FOR THE KEEP OF DOGS FROM SIXTY- FIVE CENTS TO ONE DOLLAR. THIS MATTER WAS GIVEN CONSIDERABLE CONSIDERATION AFTER WHICH MR. SMITH WAS REQUES TO PRESENT FIGURES SUBSTANTIATING THE INCREASE REQUESTED AT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD. COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MR. GEORGE R. LOaG~ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR"THE APPROPRIATION OF THIS COUNTY FOR THE CONDUCT OF ACTIVITIES BEFORE THE 1966 SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY. ON MOTION OF MR. KiRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR. PALMER~ THE 0OUNTY EXECUTIVE WAS AUTHORIZED TO INCLUDE THE EMPLOYEES OF THE CHARLOTTESVILLE-ALBEMARLE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION IN THE COUNTY'S GROUP INSURANCE PLAN~ ALL COSTS TO BE BORNE BY THE COMMISSION. REPORT WAS RECEIVED FROM THE AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS ON AUDIT OF THE dUVENILE AND DOMESTICE RELATIONS COURT AND THE ALBEMARLE COUNTY COURT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED dUNE 30, 1965, AND WAS ORDERED FILED. CLAIM AGAINST THE ~OG TAX FUND WAS RECEIVED FROM EMIL SCHMI~T FOR 10 GEESE KILLED BY DOGS. ON MOTION OF MR. PALMER~ SECONDED BY ~R. KiRKSEY~ MI~. SCHMIDT WAS ALLOWED ~1.50 FOR EACH OF THESE GEESE. CLAIM AGAINST THE DOG TAX FUND WAS RECEIVED FROM MRS. EVIA HOOVER FOR $tX HENS KILLED BY DOGS. ON MOTION OF MR, PAULETT~ SECONDED BY ~R. PALMER~ MRS. HOOVER WAS ALLOWED ~.25 FOR EACH OF THESE HENS. CLAIM AGAINST THE ~OG TAX FUND WAS RECEIVED FROM ~RS. RICHARD G. MILLER~ dR. FOR ONE EWE KILLED BY DOGS. ON MOTION OF MR. THRAVES~ SECONDED BY ~Ro PALM/R~ ~RS. MILLER WAS ALLOWED ~10.O0 FOR THIS EWE. CLAIM AGAINST THE DOG TAX FUND WAS RECEIVED FROM ~E ST. MARTIN FOR ONE LAMB BELIEVED TO HAVE BEEN KILLED BY DOGS. HOWEVER~ SINCE THE ~OG ~ARDEN WAS UNABLE TO VERIFY THIS' CLAIM~ THE SAME WAS DENIED ON MOTION OF MR. PAULETT~ SECONDED BY MR, PALMER. COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MR. dOHN ~. BEASLEY REQUESTING REFUND OF TAX tN THE AMOUNT OF ~13.O0 FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSESSED IN ERROR. ON MOTION OF MRo KIRKSEY, SECONDED BY MR. PALMER, THIS REFUND WAS APPROVED. ON MOTION OF MR. KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR. PAULETT, RULES WITH REGARD TO SECOND READING WERE SUSPENDED AND THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION UNANIMOUSLY Al)OPTED= BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ VIRGINIA~ THAT;THE{ SUM OF ~350.OO BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY APPROPRIATED FOR THE PURBHASE OF A TYPEWRITER FOR THE CLERKIS OFFICE. ON MOTION OF MR. THRAVES~ SECONDED BY ~Ro KIRKSEYy RULES WITH REGARD TO SECOND READING SERE:SUSPENDED AND THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTE~= BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY~ VIRGINIA, THAT THE SUM OF ~5~O,~3 BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY APPROPRIATED TO COVER ESTIMATED COST OF ADDITIONS AS FOLLOWS= BROADUS WOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STONE-ROBINSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 39,134.75 MR. BROWN~ REPORTING FOR THE OUVENILE ~ETENTION OOMMITTEE~ A~VlSED THAT A MEETING WAS HELD WITH THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY ~UVENILE ~ETENTION COMMISSION WITH REGARD TO THE POSSIBLE LOCATION OF A HOME IN ~AYNESBORO TO SERVE COUNTIES OF THAT AREA AS WELL AS THIS COUNTY AND THE OITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, HOWEVER~ IT WAS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE LOCAL COMMITTEE THAT SUCH A HOME BE LOCATED 1N THIS AREA. AFTER DISCUSSION OF THIS MATTER~ MOTION WAS OFFERED BY MRo KIRKSEY~ SECONDED BY MR. THRAVES~ AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED~ DIRECTING THAT THE COMMITTEE PROCEED WITH SECURING A SATISFACTORY SITE IN THIS AREA FOR A ~UVENILE DETENTION HOME TO BE CONSTRUCTED dOINTLY BY THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE AND THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE. THE FOLLOWING MOTION WAS OFFERED BY MR. THRAVES$ ~ MOVE THAT THIS ~RD OF SUPER- VISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY ABANDON ALL FURTHER ATTEMPTS AT A RE-ASSESSMENT OF ALL REAL ESTATE IN ALBEMARLE COUNTY BY ITS OWN EMPLOYEES UNTIL SUCH TIME AS A NEW RE-ASSESSMENT (EVALUATION) 18 REQUIRED BY LAW~ THE PEOPLE OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY AND THE STATE OF VIRGINIA; AN~ THAT NO EVALUATION SUBSEQUENT TO OUR LEGAL RE-ASSESSMENT MADE TWO YEARS AGO BE PLACE~ ON THE TAX BOOKS UNTIL SUCH TiME AS A NEW ASSESSMENT IS RE~UIRED FOUR YEARS FROM NOW, THIS MOTION DID NOT RECEIVE A SECOND. MR. GORDON ~HEELER~ CHAIRMAN OF THE E~UALIZATI~N ~OARD~ REPORTED THAT THE REAL ESTATE ASSESSORS AND HIS BOAR~ HAD BEEN UNABLE TO MOVE FAST ENOUGH TO COVER THE ENTIRE COUNTY THEREFORE~ THEY WOULD NOT USE~"THAT PORTION OF ASSESSMENTS WHICH HAD BEEN COMPLETED~ AND RECOMMENDED A GENERAL REASSESSMENT FOR THE YEAR 1~. SEVERAL PERSONS APPEARED WITH REGARD TO REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENTS~ INCLUDING MRo GEORGE. HUFF~ ~[R. GUY VIA~ MR. LEGH ~AEKER AND LANDON ~IRCKHEAD. IT WAS THE GENERAL CONCENSUS OF OPINION AMONG THOSE PRESENT THAT A GENERAL REASSESSMENT WOULD BE THE FAIREST APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM. MR. GEORGE PALMER MADE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT= ffWE WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE '[~UALIZATION BOARD FOR THEIR CONSCIENTIOUS AND SINCERE WORK. APPARENTLY THIS COMMUNITY IS CHANGING SO RAPIDLY FROM A ~URAL TO AN URBAN ONE THAT THE PROdECTED PLANS FOR A CONTINUOUS EQUALIZATION WILL NOT BE PRACTICAL. WE SHOULD, THEREFORE, ACCEPT THEIR RECOMMENDATION THAT WE PLAN FOR A COUNTY WIDE GENERAL ASSESSMENT IN 1966 TO BE BACKED UP BY A WELL STAFFED AND THE BOARD ASSESSORS! OFFICE AND AN ANNUAL COUNTY ASSESSMENT. THE COUNTY [XECUTIVE/SHOULD BRING TO OUR DECEMBER MEETING THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE MOST EFFECTIVE EQUALIZATION OF OUR REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES. T~is BOARD SHOULD TBEN TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION TO EFFECT THESE RECOMMEN- DATIONS.~ THE FOREGOING WAS OFFERED IN FORM OF A MOTION BY ~::{. PALMER AND WAS SECONDED BY MR o KIRKSEY. ~/~Ro THRAVES CAST THE ONLY DISSENTING VOTE ON THIS MOTION. CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY AMOUNTING TO $749~;661.36 WERE PRESENTED, EXAMINED, AND ALLOWED AND CERTIFIED TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE FOR PAYMENT AND CHARGED AGAINST THE FOLLOW- lNG FUNDS= GENERAL REVENUE FUND GENERAL OPERATING FUND SCHOOL OPERATING FUND VIRGINIA PUBLIC ASSISTANCE FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND TEXTBOOK FUND CENTRAL FIRE DISTRICT FUND DOG TAX FUND COMMONWEALTH OF VA, CURRENT CREDIT ACCOUNT $ 47.99 250,907.34 230,011.10 25,327.94 198,102.73 35,734.17 46.54 654.86 $749,661.57 ON MOTION~ THE MEETING ADdOURNED. ~ CHA I RMAN