HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP201700009 Action Letter 2017-05-10COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (434) 296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
May 10, 2017
Justin Shimp, Shimp Engineering
201 E. Main Street, Suite M
Charlottesville VA 22902
SDP2017-9 Boyd Tavern Market — Initial Site Plan
Mr. Shimp,
The Agent for the Board of Supervisors hereby grants administrative conditional approval to the above referenced
site plan. This approval shall be valid for a period of five (5) years from the date of this letter, provided that the
developer submits a final site plan for all or a portion of the site within one (1) year after the date of this letter as
provided in section 32.4.3.1 of Chapter 18 of the Code of the County of Albemarle, and thereafter diligently pursues
approval of the final site plan.
In accordance with Chapter 18 Section 32.4.2.8 Early or Mass Grading may be permitted after the following
approvals are received:
l . Engineering approval of a VSMP plan meeting the requirements of Chapter 17 of the Code of the County
of Albemarle.
2. Approval of all easements for facilities for stormwater management and drainage control.
3. ARB recommends that an expert be engaged to establish accurate cemetery boundaries prior to grading the
site.
The final site plan will not be considered to have been officially submitted until the following items are received:
1. A final site plan that satisfies all of the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
2. A fee of $1,613.
Please submit 13 copies of the final plans to the Community Development Department. The assigned Lead
Reviewer will then distribute the plans to all reviewing agencies. Once you receive the first set of comments on the
final site plan, please work with each reviewer individually to satisfy their requirements.
Please review condition/comment #1 from the Planning Division (Pat_y S), which may affect the timing of the final
site plan submittal.
The Department of Community Development shall not accept submittal of the final site plan for signature until
tentative approvals for the attached conditions from the following agencies/reviewers have been obtained:
SRC Members:
Albemarle County Planning Services (Planner) - 2 copies [Paty Saternye ext. 3250]
Albemarle County Planning Services (ARB) - 1 copy [Margaret Maliszewski ext. 3276]
Albemarle County Engineering Services (Engineer) - 1 copy [Matthew Wentland ext. 3458)
Albemarle County Information Services (E911) - 1 copy [Elise Kiewra ext. 3030]
Albemarle County Department of Fire Rescue - 1 copy [Robbie Gilmer 434-296-5833]
Virginia Department of Transportation - 2 copy [Adam Moore 434-422-9894]
Albemarle County Building inspections — 1 copy [Michael Dellinger ext. 3228]
Albemarle County Planning Services (Zoning) — 1 copy [Francis MacCall ext. 3418]
Virginia Department of Health (VDH) — 3 copy [Alan Mazurowski 434-972-6219]
If you have any questions about these conditions or the submittal requirements please feel free to contact me at
Extension 3250, psatemye@albemarle.org.
2
Phone 434-296-5832
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road,
Charlottesville, VA, 22902
Memorandum
To: Justin Shimp(justin(cDshimp-engineering.com)
From: Paty Saternye, Senior Planner
Division: Planning
Date: March 20, 2017
Updated: May 10, 2017
Subject: SDP 201700009 Boyd Tavern Market — Initial Site Plan
Fax 434-972-4126
The County of Albemarle Planning Division will recommend conditional approval of the plan referenced above
once the following conditions/comments have been satisfactorily addressed (The following
conditions/comments are those that have been identified at this time. Additional comments or conditions may
be added or eliminated based on further review.): [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference,
which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.]
NEW COMMENT - 22.2.2.111 Based on the information available to date, the agent cannot find that
the on -site water usage will not exceed more the 400 gallons per site acre per day; therefore, a
Special Use Permit (SP) will be required to allow water usage of more than 400 gallons per site acre
Per day. The SP will need to be approved prior to submittal of the final site plan. The applicant may
provide additional information to the County regarding water usage on -site. The Zoning
Administrator in consultation with the Countv Enaineer would determine whether the SP is no
longer required..
2. [17-403, 16-100, 32.5.2(k)] As specified in the engineering comments that have been attached, either a Tier
3 or 'Fier 4 groundwater assessment, and the associated fee, is required prior to approval of the Initial Site
Plan. The type of assessment required is determined by water use and the potential of a central water
supply. Once it is determined whether a Tier 3 or Tier 4 groundwater assessment is required submit a draft
Fier 3 or Tier 4 groundwater assessment for evaluation by engineering. The Initial Site Plan cannot be
approved until this has been submitted. UPDATE:_ Comment Addressed. The Tier 3 usf tificaticn. fee
and draft Tier III Groundwater Assessment have been submitted., See updated engineering
comments for more information.
3. A site plan meeting all the requirements of section 32.6 of Chapter 18 of the Code.
4. [32.7.2.1] Each entrance onto any public street shall be designed and constructed as required by the
standards of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). VDOT approval of the entrance to the site
shall be required prior to final site plat � approval. See the attached VDvT comments.
5. [22.2.2.11] Provide data that shows the expected water consumption in "gallons per site acre per day". This
must be based only on the acreage of the C-1 zoned portion of the parcel. A special use permit is required
for uses permitted by right, not served by public water, and that involve water consumption exceeding four
hundred (400) gallons per site acre per day. If water usage is above that level a special use permit will be
required prior to final site plan approval. UPDATE: Comment not vet fully addressed. See new
comment number one above.
Page 1 of 4
6. [32.5.2(k) & 16-1001 Provide information on the proposed water and septic systems, including the proposed
number of connections to each. Each physical connection to a system (water or septic) is counted,
including multiple connections serving one structure; any more than two connections requires approval by
the Board of Supervisors of a central water supply and/or central sewerage system. A Compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan review may also be required if central system(s) are necessary. UPDATE: Comment
Addressed. An exhibit was submitted showing only one connection from the well and one
connection to the engineered septic system. Since only one connection is shown the systems are
not considered central systems and therefore do not require approval by the Board of Supervisors.
[21.7(c)] No construction activity including grading or clearing of vegetation shall occur closer than 20 feet
to any residential or rural areas district unless waived by special exception by the Board of Supervisors.
This applies not only to the adjoining parcels but also to the RA zoned area of the subject parcel. The
proposed stormwater pond location is shown within the buffer zone. Relocate the proposed stormwater
pond location such that the pond, and any grading or disturbance caused by its creation, do not impact the
buffer zone.
8. [32.5.2(p), 32.7.9.7(a)(1)&(2) & 32.7.9.7(d)] Provide a complete landscape plan that meets all
requirements of section 32.7.9 with the Final Site Plan. This includes, but is not limited to, screening
requirements to all adjacent Rural Area Districts as well as Residential uses. It is important to note that
disturbance of the buffer zone (21.7(c)) is not allowed even for the purpose of screening. Therefore,
required screening will need to be located elsewhere. If the screening is accomplished by landscaping the
layout does not appear to include sufficient space for a 20' screening planting strip on the southwest side of
the property.
[5.1.20] In reference to petroleum products provide the:
• Location of the storage tanks and loading facilities on the site plan. No storage tanks or loading
facilities shall be located closer than 100' from any lot line.
• Labels for the setback for the petroleum products storage tanks and loading facilities on the existing
conditions and site overview sheets
Setback for the petroleum products storage tanks and loading facilities on the site ovewiew sheet.
10. [32.5.2(n) & 4.12.13(c)] Provide the location and dimensions of the required loading space within the site
plan.
11. [4.12.15(g)] Provide curb and gutter in the parking area and along the travelways.
12. [32.5.1(c) & 32.5.2(a)] Revise the:
• Dimensions for the boundary (bearing and distances) of the parcel so that they are darker and more
visible. They need to be dark enough to be visible when scanned and copied.
• 6.60' boundary line bearing and distance near the south corner of the lot along Black rat Road to
include the bearing.
• Setbacks on the coversheet to include the Front -Minimum setback, specify all districts that the side and
rear setback applies to, include information on the side and rear setbacks abutting lots zoned
commercial or industrial, and expand the 10' Parking setback note to specify when it applies.
13. [32.5.1(c)] Can the:
• Site plan and grading & utility plan sheets revise the iabei for the "20' Parking Setback and Buffer" to
more clearly specify what the "buffer" is for. As 21.7(c) specifies the buffer is for any construction
activity including grading or clearing of vegetation.
• Existing conditions and site overview sheets label the setback and buffer lines to differentiate them.
14. [32.5.2(a)] Revise the:
• "Abutting Parcel Information" so that TMP 94-40 shows the correct owner and most recent Deed Book
and page numbers. The parcel appears to have changed hands in 2015.
• "Abutting Parcel Information" of TMP 94-38 to include its zoning district.
• Departing lot lines so that they are dark enough to be visible when scanned and copied.
Page 2 of 4
15. [32.5.2(b)] Revise the Land Use Schedule to include the overall size of the parcel, how much is zoned RA
and how much is zoned C-1. UPDATE: Ensure that the acreage of C-1 zoned portion of the parcel is
based on the zoning determination dated 4/19/2017 (LOD2017-00012). Update all information on the
plan that specifies or utilizes the C-1 zoned acreage.
16. [32.5.2(e)] Provide labels, on all plan view sheets, identifying whether the existing wooded areas are
composed of evergreen, deciduous or a mix of types of trees.
17. [32.5.2(i)] Provide the centerline of Black Cat Road.
18. [32.5.1(a)] Revise the vicinity map to be black and white and not color. Site plans are to be only black and
white.
19. [32.5.20)] If there are any existing water, wastewater or storm drainage systems on the property show the
location and size of each. Also provide the deed book and page references for any and all existing water,
wastewater or storm drainage systems easements that are located on the property.
20. [32.5.2(k)] Provide the proposed location of the waterlines leading from the well to the proposed structures
and facilities. UPDATE: Comment Addressed. An exhibit was submitted showing only one
connection from the well and one connection to the engineered septic system. Since only one
connection is shown to each the systems are not considered central systems and therefore do not
require approval by the Board of Supervisors.
21. [32.5.2(I)] Provide the location of any existing or proposed utilities and utility easements including
telephone, cable, electric and gas. Indicate the deed book and page reference for all exiting utility
easements located on the property.
22. [32.5.2(n)] Provide:
• Outdoor lighting information including a photometric plan and location, description, and photograph or
diagram of each type of outdoor luminaire [Sec. 32.7.8 & Sec. 4.171. If there will be any external lighting
fixtures a photometric plan will be required for Final Site Plan approval. In addition to meeting all
lighting requirements a standard lighting note will be required.
• If there is to be a sign for the proposed use, on the final site plan depict and label the sign
location. (Depicting the sign on the final site plan is not approval of the sign location or type).
• Information on the proposed paving material types for all walkways, access ways and parking lots.
22. [Comment] Recommendations in reference to the cemetery:
• No fence exists around the perimeter of the existing cemetery. It appeared during the site visit that the
graveyard may extend further to the north and south then shown on the site plan. It is recommended
that more information on the extents of the cemetery are acquired and a more accurate location of the
cemetery be provided on the site plan so that it will not be disturbed by any of the proposed
improvements to the site.
• Because of the State requirement of access to graveyards, it is recommended that a path is provided as
part of the site plan for access to the cemetery and that the path be located in an area that is not steep
and hard for some people to utilize.
• Provide a note on the site plan that sper_.ifies the state requirement of right to access of the cemetery.
23. [Comment] This property is within the Monticello Viewshed. It is strongly encourage that you consult with
the Thomas Jefferson Foundation early in the site plan process about any potential visual impact of the
project.
24. [Comment] See the attached comments from the other SRC reviewers. UPDATE: The attached
comments included updated comments from zoning and engineering. Those updated comments
include conditions in reference to water usage and the ongoing evaluation of whether a special use
permit will be required.
Page 3 of 4
25. [NEW COMMENTI Revise all areas of, and calculations that use the area of, the C-1 portion of the
parcel to match the C-1 acreage specified in the Letter of Determination (LOD2017-00012) from
Francis MacCall and dated April 19, 2017. Revise the division line between the C-1 and RA zoned
portions of the parcel based on the C-1 acreage specified in LOD2017-00012 and the setbacks based
on that division line.
26. [NEW COMMENTI A revised groundwater assessment must be submitted and approved prior to
final site plan approval. See engineering's updated comments on the Tier III Draft Groundwater
Assessment. Figure 4 in the Draft Groundwater Assessment is difficult to read. Revise Figure 4
Please contact PatSM6
SAfefnye in the Planning Division by using psaternye(cDalbemarle.org or 434-296-5832 ext.
3250 for further intion.
Page 4 of 4
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Patty Saternye, Senior Planner
From: Francis MacCall, Principal Planner
Division: Zoning
Date: May 9, 2017
Subject: SDP2017-00009 Boyd Tavern Market Initial — zoning comments
Please omit any comment that you have believe has already been made with your comments.
PAGE 1 - Remove reference to incorrect sign regulations and correct with
statement that "All signs will comply with Section 4.15 as applicable."
2. PAGE 1 - Under the "WATER & SANITARY SERVICES provide the following
calculation.
Water use permitted without Special Use Permit
1312 gallons per day is permitted for the 3.28ac zoned C-1
This acreage is calculated per the old rezoning applications and plats of survey.
3. Evaluation of the data by the Zoning Administrator and the County Engineer
regarding the proposed water usage is ongoing. A final decision whether the
water usage for this site will require a special use permit or is permitted by right
must be made prior to any final site plan submittal. If it is determined that a special
use permit is needed for the proposed use then the final site plan cannot be
approved until that special use permit is granted by the Board of Supervisors.
The plan appears to show a different number for the total area on C-1 zoning. If
there is confusion/disagreement of total acres of C-1 to be used for this use for this
calculation, then a new survey of the parcel can be done to identify the area per the
previous rezoning applications. The acerage should be resolved before the final
site plan is submitted.
4. Section 5.1.20 should be noted on the first page under the zoning designation on the final
plan. Both the underground gasoline storage tanks and the loading facility for those tanks
will need to be shown complying with the setback in Section 5.1.20.
�RCl,
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
Memorandum
To: Paty Saternye
From: Matt Wentland
Date: 9 May 2017
Subject: Boyd Tavern Market — Initial Site Plan and Tier III Draft Groundwater Assessment
(SDP201700009)
The Initial Site Plan and the Tier III Draft Groundwater Assessment for the Boyd Tavern Market submittal
has been reviewed by Engineering. The following comments will need to be addressed in the Tier III Final
Groundwater Assessment and in the Final Site Plan:
Initial Site Plan:
1. All runoff from the fueling area will need to be directed to an oil/water separator before
going to the proposed pond.
2. To ensure continued compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, a flow -limiting device and
water meter are recommended to be installed on the well (and shown on the Final Site
Plan) to prevent the daily usage from surpassing the maximum allowable threshold. Usage
data should be retained and made available at the request of the Zoning Official. In the
event demand should exceed the limit, a cistern or similar device should be used.
Tier III Draft Groundwater Assessment:
1. Provide the square footage (including a breakdown of individual areas such as the deli and
bathrooms) and number of fixture units of the existing and proposed buildings in the table
provided with the Assessment (the one that includes the AADT and number of pumps).
2. Include a revised water budget estimate that limits the acreage to only the C-1 zoned area
and if no special use permit is planned, the gallons per site acre per day usage to 400
gallons (I8.22.2.2(11)).
3. Revise the language in the reserve wellfield section to reflect that it only includes the C-I
zoned area.
File: SDP201700009 Boyd Tavern Market Engineering Comments 05-09-17.doc
Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E.
Commissioner
r.•
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1601 Orange Road
Culpeper. Virginia 22701
February 14, 2017
County of Albemarle
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Attn: Paty Saternye
Re: Boyd Tavern Market — Initial Site Plan
SDP-2017-00009
Review #1
Dear Ms. Saternye:
The Department of Transportation, Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section, has reviewed the above referenced plan as submitted by Shimp Engineering, dated 6
February 2017, and offers the following comments:
1. Show ADT and design/posted speed for Route 616 on plans.
2. The minimum required spacing for full access entrances on Route 616 (Collector, 45 mph
design speed) is 335 feet. The proposed spacing of 205 feet between the two entrances
will not be permitted. Additionally, it does not appear to be feasible to have 2 entrances
that are 335 feet apart while maintaining the required distance (750') from the I-64
interchange ramp.
3. Include a trip generation report and provide left and right turn lane warrant analyses on
the plans. Based on the plans it is not clear where the proposed entrance(s) are in relation
to the existing right turn Iane; please provide more detail.
4. Provide entrance profiles, as well as sight distance profiles.
5. Please note that trees within the sight distance easements or right-of-way may have to be
removed if not pruned in such a way as to avoid becoming sight Iine obstructions.
6. Provide the VDOT WP-2 detail and note on plans the required area of mill and overlay in
accordance with the WP-2 standard.
7. The entrance curbing should be offset 12 feet from the edge of pavement, and extended
the required length of storage and taper if a right turn lane is warranted. See Figure 4-9,
Appendix F.
8. Please label all entrance radii; 45' minimum.
9. Provide a Traffic Maintenance Plan in accordance with the April 1, 2015 revision of the
Virginia Work Area Protection Manual.
10. Note that the final site plan must show conformance with the VDOT Road Design
Manual Appendices B(1) and F, as well as any other applicable standards, regulations or
other requirements.
VirginlaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
February 14, 2017
Paty Saternye
Page 2
Please provide two copies of the revised plan along with a comment response letter. If further
information is desired, please contact Justin DeeI at 434-422-9894.
A VDOT Land Use Permit will be required prior to any work within the right-of-way. The
owner/developer must contact the Charlottesville Residency Transportation and Land Use
Section at (434) 422-9399 for information pertaining to this process.
Sincerely,
NOIL, - W4V6UV
Adam J. Moore, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
VirginiaDOT.org
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Patricia Saternye
From: Margaret Maliszewski
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 4:04 PM
To: Patricia Saternye
Subject: ARB action on Boyd Tavern Market
Motion: Mr. Missel moved to approve the consent agenda and forward the recommendations outlined in the staff reports
for the Initial Site Plans to the Agent for the Site Review Committee as follows.
a. ARB-2017-10: Boyd Tavern Market Initial Plan - Initial Site Plan (TM/Parcels 09400000003900)
Proposal: To construct a convenience store and fuel pump canopy with associated site improvements.
Location: At the southwest corner of the intersection of I64 and Black Cat Road
• Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5) and recommended
conditions of initial plan approval:.
1. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval.
• Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines:
1. It is recommended that an expert be engaged to establish accurate cemetery boundaries prior to grading the site.
2. Consider reducing the length of the canopy to limit visual impacts.
• Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: None.
• Regarding the final site plan submittal:
1. Architecture and landscaping will be reviewed with a future submittal. A Certificate of Appropriateness is
required prior to final site plan approval.
2. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the site plan and the architectural drawings. "Visibility of all
mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated."
3. Illumination on site shall not exceed 20 fc at the ground.
4. Add staggered rows of mixed evergreen trees along the western and northwestern perimeters of the proposed
travelway, high on the slope, and at the north/northwest perimeter of the property, to reduce impacts of the
development on the EC.
5. Add the standard plant health note to the plan. "All site plantings of trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach,
and be maintained at, mature height; the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned
minimally and only to support the overall health of the plant."
Mr. Van Der Werf seconded the motion.
The motion carried by a vote of 5:0.
Margaret Maliszewski , Chief of Planning/Resource Management
Albemarle County Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 x3276
mmaliszewski@albemarle.org
Review Comments for SDP201700009 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name:
Boyd Tavern Market Initial - DIGITAL
Date Completed:
Saturday, February 25, 2017
Department1DivisionfAgency:
Review Sys:
Reviewer:
Robbie Gilmer
_E
Fire Rescue
I Requested Changes
Based on plans dated 16117_
1_ Please add a note " Knox Box required, contact Albemarle County Fire Marshal Office for location_"
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 03120120'17
A',
COMMONWEALTH of VIRUINIA
In Cooperation with the Thomas Jefferson Health District
State Department of Health
1138 Rose Hill Drive
Phone (434) 972-6219 P. O. Box 7546
Fax (434)972-4310
Charlottesville, Virginia 22906
March 20, 2017
Paty Satemye, Senior Planner
Albemarle County Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: Boyd Tavern Market
Initial Site Development Plan
SDP2017-9
Ms. Satemye:
ALSEMARLE CHARLOTIESVILLE
F1UVANNA COUNTY SSALMYRA)
GREENE COUNTY ISTANAROSVILLEI
LOUISA COUNTY ILOUISA)
NELSON COUNTY (LOVINGTGN)
As requested, I've reviewed the Initial Site Development Plan (2/6/17) for the Boyd
Tavern Market, referenced above.
The plan indicates that the proposed convenience store will be served by a private onsite
septic system and well. In order to permit the construction of the septic system and well,
the developer must submit an application and 3 sets of designs prepared by a professional
engineer to the Charlottesville/Albemarle County Health Department. Be advised that
approval of the site plan by this office will be contingent upon review and approval of the
septic system and well designs.
If there are any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Alan Mazarowski
Environmental Health Supervisor
Thomas Jefferson Health District
alan.mazurowski!d vdh. v i re i n ia.1'ov
Review Comments for SDP201700009 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name: Boyd Tavern Market Initial - DIGITAL
Date Completed: Friday, March 17, 2017 Department1DivisionfAgency: Review Sys:
Reviewer: Berek Bedarl' E911 No Objection CDD
Based on plans dated 216l17_
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 03120120'17
Review Comments for SDP201700009 11nitial Site Plan
Project Name:
Boyd Tavern Market Initial - DIGITAL
Date Completed:
Tuesday, February 14, 2017
Department1DivisionfAgency:
Review Sys:
Reviewer:
Keith Huckstep
CDD Inspections
No abjection
Page: County of Albemarle Printed On: 03120120'17
Patricia Saternye
From: Alexander Morrison <amorrison@serviceauthority.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 3:33 PM
To: Patricia Saternye
Subject: RE: SDP2017-9 Boyd Tavern Market - Initial Site Plan - Electronic Review
Patricia,
I have reviewed the initial site plan and the development is located in a no service area. The applicant is calling for
private well and septic. We have no facilities in the area so I have no comments.
No further review by the ACSA should be required on resubmittals or the final site plan.
Alexander J. Morrison, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Albemarle County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22911
(0) 434-977-4511 Ext. 116
(C) 434-981-5577
(F) 434-979-0698
From: Patricia Saternye [mailto:psaternye@albemarle.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 3:31 PM
To: Frank Pohl; Matthew Wentland; Margaret Maliszewski; Robbie Gilmer; Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov; Alexander
Morrison; MACCALL@albemarle.org; Derek Bedarf; Keith Huckstep; Josh Kirtley; vfort@rivanna.org
Subject: SDP2017-9 Boyd Tavern Market - Initial Site Plan - Electronic Review
All,
The above noted application was submitted this week for SRC review. It is an electronic submittal, so I have initiated a
Bluebeam session.
Bluebeam will have just sent you an email letting you know the session has been started and allowing you access to the
file.
Carla will send out the normal SRC notification letter, but I will also forward you the legal ad once it is written.
For those of you that don't want to use Bluebeam, you can access the file on laserfiche using the link in the legal ad
(either in the one I will send you or when Carla sends it).
Please provide your comments by March 201"
Thanks,
Paty Saternye
Senior Planner
Community Development
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 ext.3250
psaternye@albemarle.org
www.albemarle.org
Patricia Saternye
From: Victoria Fort <vfort@rivanna.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 4:58 PM
To: Patricia Saternye
Cc: Alex Morrison
Subject: RE: SDP2017-9 Boyd Tavern Market - Initial Site Plan - Electronic Review
Paty,
RWSA does not anticipate any impacts from this development, so we do not need to be involved in future review.
Thanks a lot,
Victoria
Victoria Fort, P.E.
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
695 Moores Creek Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22902
(P): (434) 977-2970 ext. 205
(F): (434) 295-1146
From: Patricia Saternye [mailto:psaternye@albemarle.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 3:31 PM
To: Frank Pohl <fpohl@albemarle.org>; Matthew Wentland <mwentland@albemarle.org>; Margaret Maliszewski
<MMal iszewski@albemarle.org>; Robbie Gilmer <rgilmer@albemarle.org>; Adam.Moore@vdot.virginia.gov; Alex
Morrison <amorrison@serviceauthority.org>; MACCALL@albemarle.org; Derek Bedarf <dbedarf@albemarle.org>; Keith
Huckstep <KHUCKSTE@albemarle.org>; Josh Kirtley <Joshua.kirtley@vdh.virginia.gov>; Victoria Fort
<vfort@rivanna.org>
Subject: SDP2017-9 Boyd Tavern Market - Initial Site Plan - Electronic Review
All,
The above noted application was submitted this week for SRC review. It is an electronic submittal, so I have initiated a
Bluebeam session.
Bluebeam will have just sent you an email letting you know the session has been started and allowing you access to the
file.
Carla will send out the normal SRC notification letter, but I will also forward you the legal ad once it is written.
For those of you that don't want to use Bluebeam, you can access the file on laserfiche using the link in the legal ad
(either in the one I will send you or when Carla sends it).
Please provide your comments by March 201"
Thanks,
Paty Saternye
Senior Planner
Community Development
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
434-296-5832 ext.3250
psaternye@albemarle.org
www.albemarle.org