HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA201600016 Presentation 2017-05-10Woolen MiI13-
Board
of Supervisors
May 10, 2017
Redevelopment of the Woolen MiIIs Factoryto aIlow
commercial and residential development._
r a r-- �- :. - -- - , , — , . .eft
..y
VA
� - _ - _ .rte .�•�, a 4 I � - -•jj�
40
Y _ _
_ #
k-
77 -4 -OA -14 =M -1
i��l
— �� _ 11_ -
_1:1q
5j
Zoning
MiIUs
7 _2�
r 8=_2 1
2
.!Dog
J,78- �
201 0 -P�- F
-L2�1 1 5
,78-2 A
-_____ -----%.2 02 2-78-2
Comprehensive Plan
.dry je3.5jiftthe City ro Oaunch rhe cry 's GOS vieweir.
AL --
11P
WcmAen
5®(� Mills
.......................... F MI d
1 65
ZZ1
ot/478-21 Q'�-
17:77 `['(Pwo t 4,
'.!EL 78-2-1 NI
2044
7�-
. � - 2 '1 L.2
aye
I -Z—
L7 -2 A
N -VA M&S-rp,m r
3 P,
13, t
► A
; I?, • Fig
..!
IF
I �.L , . 0 $.'
64 4�
A p
lit
VI.
jr ll Apk
jk
lei M roo
A AL
PA,
ti
PT -
} A ti. •�
r - •6
Ir - -
_
'UPrdip
- - _
S �
r %Lj
-mapr
ti
tip••
Yl
I
--
ir
4 - -- - -- b.
i
�� -
I dm
.
1
•ice ti - _
f
t i
- r
�'
AL
1
_ -IL_IL
PLI
1 aJ
L '
J_ _
1 `
■ * J T '+ate
I OF
LRXQ APE • 1
Y i
1 r
T
f
-JL �-
t 4p
?' � - � ' J� � 1 '•fir- L '� _ -.3 - r -
lot
-5�
Ham A Wright's
0
wooleTI Mills
Self @o
�®
0
� Q
4a
�
� � $
�
110��%
06.190 �
��
�c-A
Ch wk Communes �
Chur h
..16.®a
04
&4e &f
IIN
A
� f�
ƒ 0ep -
k¥#g«a
J
�
ZMA 2016-21 (Preserved Slopes to Managed
q
_ 77- 40
185
Slopes)
1 -$ah -civ E!3 �+
-01
LFI
10,
Je
Am
� � "f �'- — �� T � � � _ _ �• =ter '•x ��o
A=NIL
x���■� --�•r� 3312 -fit —
ZY
s
SP 2016-28 (Activity in the Floodplain)
ap
dML r.
+*
}I # w
dbi
4AF r
1•�
+r� ' r
UIL
im
- F
. ~
%
' nr _ ' -
_-7
IL_r - - -- -
rtL�~
t L
.� -
+ � V �
s
4&
.p
1 -
w r _ 46
yam- f-
• r t
a
OL
rzt�.
j
ol -.dM6
�AW
tl
4-hil JI7-q
F"
1. Proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Proposal allows for preservation, restoration, maintenance and use of a historic resources.
3. The property as currently zoned can be used for industrial uses. The proposed mixed use,
commercial/residential, will not result in impacts greater than those that could currently occur by -right.
4. Existing historic buildings will be used which reduces any potential change in the character of the area.
5. The proposed use is consistent with the review criteria for Special Use Permits.
6. Approval allows for flood protection of a historic resource.
ZMA 2016-16 (LI to C-1
Should the Board of Supervisors choose to approve this rezoning:
move to adopt ordinance 17-A(7) approving ZMA 2016-16.
Should the Board of Supervisors choose to deny this rezoning:
move to deny ZMA 2016-16. Should a Board member motion to deny,
he or she should state the reason(s) for denial.
ZMA 2016-21 (Preserved Slopes to Managed Slopes
Should the Board of Supervisors choose to approve this rezoning:
move to adopt ordinance 17-A(8) approving ZMA 2016-16.
Should the Board of Supervisors choose to deny this rezoning:
move to deny ZMA 2016-21. Should a Board member motion to deny,
he or she should state the reason(s) for denial.
SP 2016-27 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE C-1 DISTRICT
. IQ
SP 2016-28 ACTIVITY IN THE FLOODPLAIN
Should the Board of Supervisors choose to approve these special use
permits:
move to adopt the resolution approving SP 2016-27 and SP 2016-28
included as Attachment F including the conditions attached.
Should the Board of Supervisor choose to deny of these special use permits:
move to deny SP 2016-27 and SP 2016-28. Should a Board member motion
to deny, he or she should state the reason(s) for denial.
❑ � ��,. ti �4�� `tip
a 4 \ l
A \
_ s
CEP
u �y
a
H
w
> /r CL
LL
13
oW
ISI �LL
� �b
}1111
f
Woolen MiI13-
Planning
Commission
March 21,2017
Redevelopment of the Woolen MiIIs Factoryto aIlow
commercial and residential development._
r a r-- �- :. - -- - , , — , . .eft
..y
VA
� - _ - _ .rte .�•�, a 4 I � - -•jj�
40
Y _ _
_ #
k-
77 -4 -OA -14 =M -1
i��l
— �� _ 11_ -
_1:1q
5j
Zoning
MiIUs
7 _2�
r 8=_2 1
2
.!Dog
J,78- �
201 0 -P�- F
-L2�1 1 5
,78-2 A
-_____ -----%.2 02 2-78-2
Comprehensive Plan
.dry je3.5jiftthe City ro Oaunch rhe cry 's GOS vieweir.
AL --
11P
WcmAen
5®(� Mills
.......................... F MI d
1 65
ZZ1
ot/478-21 Q'�-
17:77 `['(Pwo t 4,
'.!EL 78-2-1 NI
2044
7�-
. � - 2 '1 L.2
aye
I -Z—
L7 -2 A
N -VA M&S-rp,m r
3 P,
13, t
► A
; I?, • Fig
..!
IF
I �.L , . 0 $.'
64 4�
A p
lit
VI.
jr ll Apk
jk
lei M roo
A AL
PA,
ti
PT -
} A ti. •�
r - •6
Ir - -
_
'UPrdip
- - _
S �
r %Lj
-mapr
ti
tip••
Yl
I
--
ir
4 - -- - -- b.
i
�� -
I dm
.
1
•ice ti - _
f
t i
- r
�'
AL
1
_ -IL_IL
PLI
1 aJ
L '
J_ _
1 `
■ * J T '+ate
I OF
LRXQ APE • 1
Y i
1 r
T
f
-JL �-
t 4p
?' � - � ' J� � 1 '•fir- L '� _ -.3 - r -
lot
-5�
Ham A Wright's
0
wooleTI Mills
Self @o
�®
0
� Q
4a
�
� � $
�
110��%
06.190 �
��
�c-A
Ch wk Communes �
Chur h
..16.®a
04
&4e &f
IIN
A
� f�
ƒ 0ep -
k¥#g«a
J
�
ZMA 2016-21 (Preserved Slopes to Managed
q
_ 77- 40
185
Slopes)
1 -$ah -civ E!3 �+
-01
LFI
10,
Je
Am
� � "f �'- — �� T � � � _ _ �• =ter '•x ��o
A=NIL
x���■� --�•r� 3312 -fit —
ZY
s
SP 2016-28 (Activity in the Floodplain)
ap
dML r.
+*
}I # w
dbi
4AF r
1•�
+r� ' r
UIL
im
- F
. ~
%
' nr _ ' -
_-7
IL_r - - -- -
rtL�~
t L
.� -
+ � V �
s
4&
.p
1 -
w r _ 46
yam- f-
• r t
a
OL
rzt�.
j
ol -.dM6
�AW
tl
4-hil JI7-q
F"
1. Proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Proposal allows for preservation, restoration, maintenance and use of a historic resources.
3. The property as currently zoned can be used for industrial uses. The proposed mixed use,
commercial/residential, will not result in impacts greater than those that could currently occur by -right.
4. Existing historic buildings will be used which reduces any potential change in the character of the area.
5. The proposed use is consistent with the review criteria for Special Use Permits.
6. Approval allows for flood protection of a historic resource.
ZMA 2016-16 (LI to C-1
Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of this
rezoning:
move to recommend approval of ZMA 2016-16 with the acceptance of the
proffers offered by the applicant.
Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend denial of this
rezon i n:
move to recommend denial of ZMA 2016-16. Should a commissioner
motion to recommend denial, he or she should state the reason(s) for
recommending denial.
ZMA 2016-21 (Preserved Slopes to Managed Slopes
Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of this
rezoning:
move to recommend approval of ZMA 2016-21.
Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend denial of this
rezoning:
I move to recommend denial of ZMA 2016-21. Should a commissioner
motion to recommend denial, he or she should state the reason(s) for
recommending denial.
SP 2016-27 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE C-1
DISTRICT
Should the Plannine Commission choose to recommend a
special use permit:
)roval of this
move to recommend approval of SP 2016-27 with the conditions outlined
in the staff report.
Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend denial of this
special use permit:
I move to recommend denial of SP 2016-27. Should a commissioner motion
to recommend denial, he or she should state the reason(s) for recommending
denial.
SP 2016-28 ACTIVITY IN THE FLOODPLAIN
Should the Plannine Commission choose to recommend a
special use permit:
)roval of this
move to recommend approval of SP 2016-28 with the conditions outlined
in the staff report.
Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend denial of this
special use permit:
I move to recommend denial of SP 2016-28. Should a commissioner motion
to recommend denial, he or she should state the reason(s) for recommending
denial.
❑ � ��,. ti �4�� `tip
a 4 \ l
A \
_ s
CEP
u �y
a
H
w
> /r CL
LL
13
oW
ISI �LL
� �b
}1111
ZMA 2016-16 Woolen Mills
Joint Work Session
Albemarle County Planning Commission
City of Charlottesville Planning Commission
October 25, 2016
Charlottesville City `
llsirrg fhe fdenlify tool,
click insure fire Cify to launctr the City's GIS viewer
W
N 44C3 77.40E
y,
150 Z
18001
me-
`?
77-'4�4N 77 A
.1
77-40P�
0
� 1 �
1144 105
725
396 #k
Woolen
Mills
�) 8=21q`�B-2IS �
-..% i r V
I r 190fa?'8=�1�i'�
200q 782N", 9
Q
}78F iP p ,
414g34g1 1178-2
. B-21 N2 08
i8-2INk24i 1 K
77-40A 11751771
1165'!I164 .
CREEK
77-3881
743
7�1 7 J
J
78-20JI
149
78,20)
7€-221 -
690
78-2DF
78-29M2
X478-34
Charlottesville City
Eking the ltfen[ify tool, - —
Wi,;k iwide (lie? City i41r741Re. h the city's C41; Viewer —
i' –r --
k,4
ii1� X24
WO'
oca 77.ao� :r Woolen
M i I ISEV
�*
@F 1sQpli 1 7g_e`8-2.1�
�77b2-5
rr
a i 20dp 7
'` 81
77 N-4 78.21
1:7p I
$01* 201 011 0. ,
77-p 1811
0
_ 2:
78-
77A 1175117:164
-
i
L
S FJ E K
yL 77-3661 -
MOP 703 �� 697 I
7p7
396 ft
78-22A
7E-2OF
78-20.1
Charlottesville City
Using tiro Iden [i7y too;,
click inside the City to launch the C ly's G;S viewer.
=P
? woolen
-�
Mills
#_• Z
a
1� $' 18401 180# 78'
A!'"R X40 # '� 90 78-2.1R ,
77.40 M �l+ 181 o
1 '► X7} 2 4 X822 ?,DO 78 21D 1 0
c� I. n 2Q14�00 1931
i \
19D f 8 -P 1 hS2014La-2 i K�
�7'•�0F' '�� H1� 7$'271.21$ 791
1811.
1519t �
}
74
IO DB+I 78 211
77-40A
M aea- r =
rr�yt 77-38�
NCO 703
725
396 ft
�155f
7*
C Rt EJ{
07
N
..M-
79 -22A 1169
a
76.200
,t
?E -2M2
Charlottesville City
Using the Mon fify 1001,
clic k iris ide fhe City fo la irnc h the [: fty's CP;S viewer.
77005.T.,
11
E7Q3--A
Woolen
h
�.. _ rills
7a5
1975117.1
r. 11
2a() 7142 4\
20oat
,V
�
if I
z r�
7a-20JI
78-20J
79.20M
Break Down of Uses
• Residential — 76,742 sf (existing building)
• Restaurant -15,211 sf (existing building)
• Live Work
• Residential - 9,287 sf(existing building)
• Non Residential — 9,287 sf(existing building)
• Non residential 7,232 sf (existing building)
• Light Industrial— 40,000 sf (new building)
Ir
----,---�_----------� L
- -
IP
r
. DEW I 117
'SRA aS
r .- I
�1JEilm _ --• �W -
5p R Y rY
PMUErE y S "RA
ACD"
D"
�• r
%% '
FrM Twk&P
I
EAQ
�ROL
g
P9Li-i
4DJO '"Loff� F
1�J STORO;
nUMPA-r rm - - I
Us"W*a
{SIX
r.Fti5F �.
D -M IF
_ �k
k
Summary of Applications Needed
• Rezoning from LI, Light Industry to C1, Commercial.
• Rezoning of the Steep Slopes Overlay District. This is required in
order to allow disturbance of the preserved slopes. Parking and the
new industrial building are shown in areas of preserved slopes.
• Special Use Permit for residential use in the C1, Commercial District.
• Special Use Permit to allow activity in the floodplain. This activity will
include the construction of a floodwall and other flood proofing
measures to allow residential use of the existing structures.
• Variation request to reduce required parking.
Summary of Main Issues
• Provision of Parking
• Access to East Market Street
• Public Safety access to the site
• Traffic Study
• Accuracy of floodplain information
• Maintaining historic value of the site
• Trail access
• Changes in character of district due to new residents