HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP199900128 Review Comments Architectural Review Board Approval 2017-06-20COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Community Development
401 McIntire Road, North Wing
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (43296-5832 Fax (434) 972-4126
June 16, 2017
Randy Smith
American Legion
PO Box 6566
Charlottesville, VA 22906
RE: ARB -2017-53: American Legion Lighting Amendment
Dear Randy,
We have received the above -noted application for a county -wide Certificate of Appropriateness. The following revisions
are requested to make the proposal consistent with the design criteria that apply to the County -wide Certificate.
1. A cut sheet for a shoebox fixture was included with the ARB submittal. This cut sheet differs from the shoebox
fixture cut sheet that is included on the plan. Please explain.
2. What is the color proposed for the B fixture and pole? Bronze or black are approvable. Include a note on the plan that
indicates the proposed color.
3. The zoning ordinance limits spillover of illumination onto public roads to .5 footcandles (fe). The lighting plan shows
spillover from the relocated fixtures along the Rt, 22 frontage in excess of that limit. To meet ordinance requirements,
spillover at the property line from the relocated fixtures cannot exceed .5 fe. Please revise the plan accordingly.
4. Add the standard lighting note to the plan: Each outdoor luminaire equipped with a lamp that emits 3, 000 or more
initial lumens shall he a full cutoff luminaire and shall he arranged or shielded to reflect light away from adjoining
residential districts and away from adjacent roads. The spillover of lightingfrom luminaires onto public roads and
property in residential or rural areas zoning districts shall not exceed one-half footcandle.
5. To meet ordinance requirements, the LLF (maintenance factor) used in calculating the photometrics must be 1.0.
Confirm and note on the plan that the LLF used in calculating the photometries is 1.0.
Within 15 days of the date of this letter, please send me a letter (by email is acceptable) indicating whether you will or
will not proceed with these revisions. If you choose not to proceed with these revisions, staff will be unable to approve
your application. If you choose to proceed with the revisions, please forward me one set of revised drawings together with
a memo summarizing the revisions you've made. Your decision to make the revisions will suspend the 60 -day review
period associated with your original submittal. However, I expect to complete the review of your revised proposal within
2 weeks of your re -submittal. If you have any questions about this action, please contact me as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Margaret Maliszewski
Chief of Planning/Resource Management
cc: ARB File
FAX (804) 972-4126
P�RGINIP
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Building Code and Zoning Services
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 2290214596
TELEPHONE (804) 296-5832
MEMORANDUM
TO Stephen Waller, Planner
FROM John Shepherd, Zoning Manager
DATE November 10, 1999
NOV 10 1999
PLANNING AND
RE SDP -99-128 Shadwell Antiquaires Major Site Plan Amendment
Dated September 28, 1999
Revised October 15, 1999
TTD (804) 972-4012
The Albemarle County Department of Building Code and Zoning Services will approve
the major amendment to the plan for zoning compliance when the following items have
been satisfactorily addressed The Building Official may provide separate comments
On Sheet 1 of 2, a diagram of the Hubble Magnusquare is shown and its locations
are indicated This information is not included on the photometric plan Please
reconcile this discrepancy
2 [30 6] Please be aware that final plan approval is subject to the issuance of a
Certificate of Appropriateness from the Architectural Review Board The Design
Planner will inform you when this requirement has been met.
Please contact me if you have questions or require additional information
M-
M -
Albemarle
Albemarle County Development Departments SDP -1999-128
SPIN Submission and Comments Shadwell Antiquares Major
Amendment
Architectural Review Board major amendment - revised revision 2
reviewer received reviewed decision
Margaret Pickart 11/1/99 11/10/99 requested changes
I have reviewed the plan with revision date of October 15, 1999 1 have the following comments
1 Add two (2) trees on the south side of the new parking area. These trees should be Oak or Maple
trees to match the other landscaping on site
2 Continue the row of shrubs along Route 22 in front of the new parking area.
3 The Hubbel-Magnusquare pole light shown on Sheet 1 of 2 is not part of the ARB -approved plan The
fixture diagram and locations should be removed from the sheet, or the diagram and locations should be
added to the photometric plan and submitted for review and approval by the ARB
4 The landscaping shown on Sheet 1 of 2 does not correspond to the ARB -approved plan and the
"Landscape Plan" is not numbered consecutively as part of the Amendment plan set. To clarify the
proposal, I recommend that the landscaping be removed from Sheet 1 and that all sheets that are
intended to be part of the amendment set be numbered consecutively Other options may exist for
clarifying revisions to proposed landscaping.
11/10/99 03:58 PM Page 1 of 1
R
Stephen Waller
From
Mark Graham
Sent:
Tuesday, November 02, 1999 11 43 AM
To
Stephen Waller
Cc:
Glenn Brooks
Subject:
Shadwell Antiquaries
reviewed the plan amendment which was submitted on November 1, 1999 The plan has not changed except they are
now showing the right deceleration lane The E&SC plan submitted still does not match the new plan and must be revised
Therefore, I believe my previous approval condition still remains unchanged If you wish, I'll simply go into SPIN and
change the date to make sure the Engineering comment reflects the current plan Otherwise, I don't think I have to do
anything else with my comments
Albemarle County Development Departments
SPIN Submission and Comments
Health Department
M
SDP -1999-128
Shadwell Antiquares Major
Amendment
[description and date]
reviewer received reviewed decision
unassigned 10/7/99 11/2/99
A permit has been issued with several conditions The Tearoom may open for no
more than 8 hours per day and is limited to 40 seats No public restroom may
be provided in the Antiquary building A new IIB well must be drilled The
existing I I I B well must be abandoned in order to have a 100% reserve area
available. The owner must submit daily water use readings for 6 months If
water use exceeds design limits, then a reduction in seating may be necessary
revision 1
11/10/99 04:00 PM Page 1 of 1
f
Albemarle County Development Departments SDP -1999-128
SPIN Submission and Comments Shadwell Antiquares Major
Amendment
Engineering major amendment revision 2
reviewer received reviewed decision
Mark Graham 10/7/99 10/13/99 approved with conditions
1 Engineering has reviewed the referenced plans as revised on September 28, 1999, which were
received by this office on October 7, 1999 Engineering recommends approval of the amendment
provided the approved Erosion Control Plan is amended to include the additional parking lot and changes
to the storm structures
2 VDOT may have additional comments with regard to the proposed entrance improvements and failure
to obtain necessary offsite easements to allow construction of those improvements Applicant is
responsible for obtaining required entrance permit from VDOT for this plan
11/10/99 04 13 PM Page 1 of 1
M
M
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 - 5823 Ext.3385
Fax (804) 972 - 4035
October 19, 1999
Kurt M. Gloeckner
Gloeckner Engineering & Surveying, Inc.
2246 Ivy Road, Suite 5
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Re SDP 99-128 Shadwell Antiquaires Major site Plan Amendment
Dear Mr Gloeckner-
The Site Review Committee has reviewed the development proposal referenced above. Preliminary comments
from the following agencies, as applicable, are attached.
Albemarle County Department of Engineering and Public Works
Albemarle County Department of Building Code
Albemarle County Department of Zoning
Albemarle County Department of Planning & Community Development
Albemarle County Fire/Rescue Division
Albemarle County Service Authority
Virginia Department of Transportation
Thomas Jefferson Health District
Comments reflect information available at the time the development proposal was reviewed, and should not be
considered final. However, the Site Review Committee has attempted to identify all issues pertaining to the
approval of the proposed project.
Please make the revisions which have been identified as necessary for preliminary approval by the Site
Review Committee. If you choose not to make the requested revisions, please submit in writing justification
for not incorporating such revisions. Submit seven full size copies and one 11 "x 17" copy to the Department of
Planning and Community Development. Responses to the attached comments of the Site Review Committee
must be submitted by November 1, 1999 Failure to submit this information by this date will result in
suspension of the review schedule.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Ste en Waller
Planner
Attachments. Site Review Comments
Copy- SDP 99-128
Jacques Logarides
OF A
516
�'IRGIt�P
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 - 5823 Ext.3385
Fax (804) 972 —4035
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kurt M. Gloeckner
FROM: Stephen Waller, Planner AV
DATE: October 20, 1999
RE- SDP 99-128 Shadwell Anhquaires Mayor Site Plan Amendment
The Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community Development will approve
the site plan amendment when the following items have been satisfactorily addressed. [Each
comment is preceded by the applicable reference.]
1 [32 5 6b] The calculations for "Total Impervious parking and Vehicular Impervious
Area" and "Total Impervious Area" are identical to those shown on the previously
approved plan. These calculations for impervious area must be updated to account
for the additional pavement that is being proposed in this amendment.
[32 7 9 7e] In order to provide the appropriate amount of parking lot screening the
row of 24 inch high Skip Laurel must be extended to the end of the parking area
addition.
32 5 6] Please show the lines from the septic serving the proposed restaurant to the
septic reserve drainfield area.
Copy- SDP 99-128
Jacques Logarides
COMMISSIONER
TEL 804 979 3759
f
Co
1 IONWEALTH of VIR.QINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPDRTAn
CN
701 VDCT WAY
IiCHARLOTTESVILLE.22911 ; October 19, 1999
Site Review Meeting
October 21, 1999
Mr Glenn E. Brooks 11
Dept. of Engineering
401 McIntire Road I
Charlottesville, VA. 229021
Dear Mr, Brooks -
P 001
A- is TUCKER
RESICENT ENGwEER
The following are oil r +:omments-
SDP-1949-128 5hai�w1;ll An ' uar'es Ma'or Amendment o
use 22
> The plan does nc; 2,1equately address the improvements if the Luc
not constructed. I ` �, Sketch dated September 29, 1999 indicating the JousStone
us lan is
entrance and decja 1 lane should be attached to this plan.
,
> A 425' sight eas( n--nt to the west is required.
? CG -12 handicap 1, IN required in all curb radii.
I�W-d
> Entrance width sr; be expanded to 36' to allow for one ingress lane and two
egress lanes.
i�
> The face of curb; 7 [I need to be at 26' frorn the centerline of Route 1455 A
typical section wii l need to be shown for this with the
face of curbs. x overall width being 52' to
i
➢ water and sewer IIrossing will regwre a bore and encasement under Route 1455
This should be on plan.
> Existing drainag I f ac:ilities will need to be shown.(Ar
Forest Drive appd r -to be in error) Of W te'wood & Oak
I'
,iIINSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
VYLL _TEL 804 979 3759 P 003
Im
R
i I Page 2
October 19, 1999
Mr Glenn E. Brooks
Site Plan Review Meeting
Drainage comp ations reed for review
➢ Inner parcel aca �as should be provided to the parking areas, particularly from parcel
«C9, ,
I�
SDp'29' j tern] ��iinal Auto Snort Maior Site Plan Amendmen.,. Route 29
> Completion of fil 11 dontage to northern property ?'
Lane with rural c > ; section}. boundary will be required (1
i
of site.
➢ fsite.J i
Recommend a 1 +) left turn Iane and 100' taper at e�stinng cross-over just north
I �
i
➢ Recommend innA "-:,=el access with the adjacent lots.
SUB -99-253 G
'n i k Orchard r minary PT t. Route 691
> Indicate plan vie 1•fsection one and its connection to
� this proposed plat.
Indicate splits in I1- ,Tic pattern to determine design criteria.
> A sight easement ;s required across Lots 66 and 67 to maintain a 250' sight
Iine.
I
Road plans and I '21age computations required for review
iI
it
�i
.i
UUT- UY I LL TEL 804 979 3759 P 004
!! _ —
i` Page 3
Mr. Glenn E. BuI �C� itis October 19, 1999
Site plan Reviehj, I%jeeting
The proposed siji ! presen#s some real challenges for the best option when there are
so many uzrlaiou; a5 with regard to the Route 29 widening
] e Route
widening project and the development of the road from Route9 to Route 29 via the
development ardl Ike options which may not be all inclusive, are as follows:
11
I If there are ziI frontage roads with the Route 29 widening project then the
development II o gid. becomes important for a provisional cross-over,
although it * uld be close to iTREF
2. Remove theci►'WS-over proposed at the Post Office facility when development
road is conne;tIA to Route 29, which would allow right in and right out only at
Post OfficelL'i urel Hills Church.
3. Move the Pmo: ed entrance to Value America further west and allow for right in
and right out n �.. This will create too man U-
Y turns at Deerwaod and the crass -
over to the eail t ;,/here ever it may be located. (UREF or Post Office)
!
4. The Value Ari nrica site entrance could line up with the Postal Service entrance,
however then" Iii t Ls closer to UREF than recommended and becomes difficult to
provide side !. side left turns- If this becomes a cross-over with type of usage
proposed, it wl u ld be difficult to close.
11
5. Our strongest ecommendation would be for the closure of the cross-over at the
Post Office, if ilClre is a frontage road in widenuz and
be located f= lei- `west along Route 549 that woullmet project that the cross-over
be located -li s c. spacing
requirements by
erve Value America and the church along with J E. Wright,
property If tIdI:r,: is inter -parcel access there is possibilities for access to D bleann
Drive and Uk IST entrance through this cross-over
N
ILLAU4 9i9 J/39 P 005
Page 4
Mr Glenn E. Binks October 19, 1999
Site Plan Revieil Meeting
> Prior to the 110 Me 649 improvements, a minimal right tum and taper will be
required (10!i' x 100').
A A dedication�iofright of way will be required far a 200'
lax 200' right turn and tapes
ne along wi�Eb a 200' x 200' left turn cane. This requirement is based without the
proposed imi!rovements to Route 649 The D
of the total n't�: of way for the Department recommends a dedication
�.. project improvements and required turn lanes.
i
> The develops iShould escrow funds with the County/Airport Authority to be used
to cover the r,roti,ements for a standard right turn lane, cross-over and a left turn
lane (storage( eIt9th to be determined by traffic study).
> Inner parcel should be
required by the County to Dobleann Drive and the
UREF entrar�m road.
> Drainage 000 '111? atations required for the review
I
> Required traAc signal installation at Route 649/
met. i site entrance if/when warrants are
> Delete the 10}` �' ;acceleration taper at site entrance_
I�
z A traffic stud! i H required to evaluate impacts of the proposed Value America site
on the operat l�m of Airport Road (Route 649) at the site entrance and at US 29
This traffic sti!I dt, ,should include the following:
• AM and 1I;I,4 peak hour analysis of Route 649/site entrance and Route
649/Routq; 2" intersections in opening year of site and ten
ear
y period (2009)
• Trip genera llticn rates (ITE e ed., #715 Single Tenant office) should be
applied toil milding area and number of employees for comparison, as
proposed ! seg may be more intense than typical office buildings.
.I
1 TEL 804 979 3759 P 006
Page 5
October 19, 1999
Mr. Glenn E. Brooks
Site Plan Review Meeting
• Anaiyze :� n/R out access only, with associated U -tum impacts at adjacent
cross-ov( r along Airport Load.
•alyze 111 f movement cross-over at site entrance aloe
opening 1 e;3r and 2009 g Airport Road in
• Analyze )0' ject impacts to Route 649/US 29 intersection with Airport Road
2009_
widening project for opening day and with Airport Road improvements for
The engineei ;/.applicant should contact Mr Robert Ball regarding the traffic
study, if they should have any questions.
We believe ai .=(--ering between the County, VDOT and the Airport Authority
would be ben.f cial, so this site and the Airport Road project can move forward.
i
U -9!9 ',��rin�rid�e Project Preliminary Plat. Route 152I
> Right tun. lanes will be required at intersection approaches of Springridge
Drive atw ,Powell Creek and also at Springridge Drive and Springndge
Parkway.
> Sight ease 116nts required across Lot 1 from each intersection of the private
road to thi i ', tersection of Springridgc Drive.
> The road, rd 3s section for Springridge Park between the western most private
road and ` pringridge Drive will require a 36' width.
> Waterline got permitted under pavement.
M
Mr Glenn E_ Brooks
Site Plan Review Meeting
IM
Page 6
October 19, 1999
� The prop )sed traffic circle will require alignment with the intersection.
> Road pIa ;s designed under the current subdivision standards, along with
drainage 'MIPutations and pavement design worksheets will he required
far reviei,
SUB-99-25213Que Ride Meadow Snbd' 'xion PreYiminery hat, Route 666
' If this roa Iway is Proposed as a street to be accepted for maintenance, the note
making n' terence to a sub -standard design will need to be removed from the
plat.
Road Alai s and drainage computations required if proposed as a state accepted
street.
> Recomme ad a 25' right of way dedication from T.M.p 18-21B
> State Rou c 666 is a non -tolerable road and :s currently not in the 6 year plan
for tmpror eFnents, therefore we recommend the developer improve the
roadway i •om their proposed entrance to Route 664, if adequate right of way
is availab.
i'
Page 7
October 19, 1999
Mr Glenn E. Brooks
Site Plan Review Meeting i
-99' la erne er Preliminary Fiat Route 660
Early'v !� Jsorest Drive should be Iabeted Wake
Farm had ;i:' adequate private street ca field Farm Road. (Wakefield
f connection to Route 660)
%` TheexisN. i2� a
j. 20 access easement shown dQes not have an
uate location
for an arn1 Tattce with its intersection with Route 743. A sight went is
requiredfq :)n Properties not controlled by this owner.
Ii
prior to sharingIf you heapshould, Ic.live concerns with these comments, please discuss with our office
with the apFj ac .tnt.
!i
Sincerely,
J. H. Kesterson
JH JIdw Per. & Sub Spec. Supv
cc - Karen Kilby
Robert Ball
Marshall Barron
ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY
MEMO
RECEIVE
TO Stephen B. Waller, Planner
FROM Peter C. Gorham, Senior Civil EngineeA OCT 19 1999
PLANNING AND
DATE October 21, 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RE Site Plan Technical Review for. Shadwell Antiquaires Major
Amendment (TM 79, Parcel 19)
The below checked items apply to this site.
X 1. This site plan is not within the Authority's
jurisdictional area for.
X A. Water and sewer
B. Water only
C. Water only to existing structure
D. Limited service
2. A inch waterline is located approximately
distant
3. Fire flow from nearest public hydrant, located
distant from this site plan, is gpm + at 20 psi
residual.
4. A inch sewer line is located distant.
5. An Industrial Waste Ordinance survey form must be
completed.
6. No improvements or obstructions shall be placed within
existing or future easements.
7, and plans are currently under review
8. and plans have been received and approved.
9 No plans are required.
10. Final and plans are required for our
review and approval prior to granting tentative
approval.
11. Final site plan may/may not be signed.
12. RWSA approval for water and/or sewer connections.
Comments:
The site plan does not show or incorrectly shows
meter locations waterline size
waterline locations sewer line size
sewer line locations expected wastewater flows
easements expected water demands
SDP -99-128
Albemarle County Development Departments SDP -1999-128
SPIN Submission and Comments Shadwell Antiquares Major
Amendment
Fire/Rescue
reviewer received
Bruce Crow 10/7/99
The Fire Rescue Division has no comment.
[description and date]
reviewed decision
10/19/99 approved
revision 1
10/20/99 09.41 AM Page 1 of 1
Albemarle County Development Departments SDP -1999-128
SPIN Submission and Comments Shadwell Antiquares Major
Amendment
Building major site plan amendment revision 1
reviewer received reviewed decision
Jay Schlothauer 10/7/99 10/15/99 approved
Based on plans revised September 28, 1999
No comments or conditions.
10/20/99 09.42 AM Page 1 of 1
R
Albemarle County Development Departments
SPIN Submission and Comments
Engineering
reviewer received
Mark Graham 10/7/99
major amendment
R
SDP -1999-128
Shadwell Antiquares Major
Amendment
revision 2
reviewed decision
10/13/99 approved with conditions
1 Engineering has reviewed the referenced plans as revised on September 28, 1999, which were
received by this office on October 7, 1999 Engineering recommends approval of the amendment
provided the approved Erosion Control Plan is amended to include the additional parking lot and changes
to the storm structures
2. VDOT may have additional comments with regard to the proposed entrance improvements and failure
to obtain necessary offsite easements to allow construction of those improvements Applicant is
responsible for obtaining required entrance permit from VDOT for this plan
10/20/99 09:42 AM Page 1 of 1
FAX (804) 972-4126
�'IRGI131P
COUNTY OF ALBEMARI E
Department of Building Code and Zoning Services
401 McIntire Road, Room 227
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
TELEPHONE (804) 296-5832
MEMORANDUM
TO Stephen Waller, Planner
FROM John Shepherd, Permit and Plan Specialist&_
DATE October 12, 1999
RE SDP -99-128 Shadwell Antiquaires Major Site Plan
Dated September 28, 1999
OCT 12 1999
PLANNING) AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TTD (804) 972-4012
The Albemarle County Department of Building Code and Zoning Services will approve
the major amendment to the plan for zoning compliance when the following items have
been satisfactorily addressed The Building Official may provide separate comments
[Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Zoning
Ordinance unless otherwise specified ]
1 [30 6] The final plan approval is subject to the issuance of a Certificate of
Appropriateness from the Architectural Review Board
2 The following comments apply to lighting proposed on this amendment:
• [32 5 6 n] Show the location of additional proposed lighting on the plan
[32 6 6 j] Provide a description and photograph or diagram and show the location
of each type of proposed outdoor luminaire that emits 3,000 or more initial
lumens Please be aware that installation of such luminaires in the future that are
not shown on this plan shall require an amendment to this plan
• [32 6 6 j & 4 17 4 b] Include a photometric plan on the site plan demonstrating
that additional parking area luminaires are in compliance with 4 17 4 b
Please contact me if you have questions or require additional information
R
Albemarle County Development Departments
SPIN Submission and Comments
M
SDP -1999-128
Shadwell Antiquares Major
Amendment
E-911 Mapping [description and date] revision 1
reviewer received reviewed decision
Damon Pettitt 10/7/99 10/11/99 approved
No action by E-911 Addressing Staff is necessary for FINAL approval
The E-911 address for the Restaurant Tea Shop will be 3015 Louisa Road
The E-911 address for the Antique store will be 3025 Louisa Road
10/20/99 09.42 AM Page 1 of 1