Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLZC200400013 Action Letter 2017-07-1214 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596 Phone (434) 296-5832 September 27, 2004 Prudential Insurance Company of America Attn: Diedre M. Davis, esq. Real Estate Law Department Two Ravinia Drive, Suite 1400 Atlanta, GA 3 03 46-2110 RE: Tax Map 78, Parcel 17D Pantops Shopping Center Dear Ms. Davis: Fax (434) 972-4126 This letter replaces the letter regarding this property to Steve Hopkins that is dated September 22, 2004. You have asked for a letter that provides an analysis of the zoning and other information regarding the referenced property, located at the intersection of Riverbend Drive and South Pantops Drive in Charlottesville, VA. This letter is based on a review of our records and an inspection of the site. L The property is zoned PD-SC, Planned Development -Shopping Center. A copy of the action letter for ZMA-83-2 is enclosed. 2. SP-87-93 was approved, with a condition, on December 16, 1987 to allow a fast food restaurant with a drive through window on the parcel. SP-90-08 was approved, with conditions, on April 18, 1990 to allow a veterinary clinic on the parcel. 3. The parcels abutting the subject parcel are zoned PD-SC, Planned Development - Shopping Center and C-1, Commercial. 1:1DEPMCMDetermin of Compliance12004 CompliancelComp-2004-13 Pantops Shopping Center.doc Diedre M. Davis, esq. September 27, 2004 Page 2 4. The free-standing shopping center sign is legally nonconforming because it exceeds 32 square feet and is taller than 12 feet. There are no other legal non- conforming issues identified on this site. A copy of Section 4.15.24 that contains the nonconforming sign regulations is enclosed. 5. The site has been developed in accord with a site plan designated as SDP-83-29 that was approved on June 7, 1983. The site plan was most recently amended on July 1, 2004. The site improvements, including the parking, were inspected for zoning compliance on September 17, 2004. No violations were identified on the site on that date. 6. A review of our records -does not show any unresolved zoning or building code violations and /or complaints. 7. A list of the Certificates of Occupancy that have been issued for this site was provided in a letter from Willie Mae Hoover dated June 22, 1988. That list was updated and clarified in an email from Kathy Martin dated September 2, 2004. It is the policy of this department to purge building permit files after three years. Copies of Certificates of Occupancy are maintained on microfilm. Therefore, we have not retained any copies of Certificates of Occupancy associated with this project. The absence of a Certificate of Occupancy for the project will not give rise to any enforcement action. Please be aware that interior renovation that does not involve a change of use does not require a Certificate of Occupancy. You may obtain a copy of a Certificate of Occupancy for an additional fee of $25.00 each. Sincerely, John Shepherd Manager of Zoning Administration Enclosures: Section 4.15.24 Willie Mae Hoover letter Kathy Martin letter ZMA-83-2 approval Copy: Reading File 78-17D Steve Hopkins Great Eastern Management Company P.O. Box 5526 Charlottesville, VA 22905 1ADEPTOCMDetermin of Compliance12004 Corrpliance\Comp-2004-13 Pantops Shopping Center.doc b. Removal, unlawful erection ofsign. If a sign is erected on private property in violation of this section 4.15, the zoning administrator shall order the owner or lessee of the property on which the sign is located to remove the sign within a time period determined by the zoning administrator to be appropriate under the circumstances. If the owner or lessee fails to comply with the order, the zoning administrator may cause the sign to be removed or initiate such other action as may be necessary to compel compliance with the provisions of this section 4.15. If a sign is erected on public property, including a public right-of-way in violation of this section 4.15, any county employee may immediately remove the sign without prior notice to the owner of the sign. c. Removal of copy on sign face; discontinuance of pertinent use. If the use of a structure or property is discontinued, the copy on each sign face pertaining to that use shall be removed by the owner or lessee of the property on which the sign is located within two (2) years from the date of the discontinuance of the use. If the owner or lessee fails to remove the copy, the zoning administrator may cause the copy to be removed or initiate such other action as may be necessary to compel compliance with the provisions of this section 4.15. d. Liabilityfor cost of removal by county. If the zoning administrator causes a sign or copy on a sign face to be removed under the provisions of this section, the cost of such removal shall be chargeable to the owner of the sign or the owner or lessee of the property on which the sign is located. e. Custody and destruction of removed signs. Cardboard and paper signs that have been removed by the county pursuant to this section shall be destroyed upon removal. All other signs which have been removed by the county shall be held for a period of thirty (30) days and may be reclaimed by the sign owner within that time by reimbursing the county for the costs of removal. If such a sign is not reclaimed within the thirty (30)-day period, it shall be deemed to have been forfeited by the owner and shall be destroyed. (12-10-80; 7-8-92, § 4.15.09.4 (part); Ord. 01-18(3), 5-9-01) State law reference — Va. Code § 15.2-2280. 4.15.24 NONCONFORMING SIGNS A nonconforming sign may continue, subject to the provisions, conditions and prohibitions set forth herein: a. Alteration ofcopy. The copy of a nonconforming sign may be altered by refacing the sign by or for the current owner of the establishment to which the sign pertains. b. Alteration of sign structure. A nonconforming sign shall not be structurally altered; provided that the zoning administrator may authorize a nonconforming sign to be structurally altered so that it is less nonconforming and further provided that each time the nonconforming sign is structurally altered, the sign area and sign height shall be reduced by at least twenty-five (25) percent of its current area and height until the sign area and the sign height are conforming. c. Consolidation. Two or more nonconforming signs on i lot may be consolidated into a single sign; provided that the resulting sign area and sign height shall be reduced by at least twenty- five (25) percent of its current area and height until the sign area and the sign height are conforming, and further provided that each time the resulting nonconforming sign is thereafter consolidated with another nonconforming sign on the lot, the resulting sign area and sign height shall be reduced by at least twenty-five (25) percent of its current area and height, until the sign area and the sign height are conforming. A sign resulting from the consolidation of 18-4-49 Zoning Supplement # 15, 5-9-01 nonconforming signs shall not have greater sign height than any of the signs that were consolidated. d. Discontinuance of copy on sign face. A nonconforming sign without copy on its sign face for a continuous period of two (2) years shall lose its nonconforming status and be removed by the owner of the property on which the sign is located. e. Discontinuance of use or structure to which sign pertains. A nonconforming sign shall lose its nonconforming status and be removed by the owner of the property on which the sign is located if the use to which the sign pertains is discontinued for more than two (2) years. f. Enlargement or extension. A nonconforming sign shall not be enlarged or extended. g. Maintenance. A nonconforming sign shall be maintained in good repair and condition. h. Relocation. A nonconforming sign shall not be moved to another location on the same lot or to any other lot; provided that the zoning administrator may authorize a nonconforming sign to be moved to a location that is more in compliance with the purpose and intent of this section 4.15. i. Replacement or restoration. A nonconforming sign may be replaced or restored only as provided below: 1. A nonconforming sign that is destroyed or damaged by the owner of the sign or the owner of the lot on which the sign is located shall not be replaced or restored unless it complies with this section 4.15. 2. A nonconforming sign that is destroyed or damaged as a result of factors beyond the control of the owner of the sign and the owner of the lot on which the sign is located, to an extent the destruction or damage exceeds fifty (50) percent of its appraised value, shall not be replaced or restored unless it complies with this section 4.15. A nonconforming sign that is destroyed or damaged as a•result of factors beyond the control of the owner of the sign and the owner of the lot on which the sign is located, to an extent the destruction or damage is fifty (50) percent or less of the appraised value, may be replaced or restored provided that the replacement or restoration is completed within two (2) years after the date of the destruction or damage, and the sign is not enlarged or extended. j. Removal if in unsafe condition. A nonconforming sign declared to be unsafe by a public safety official because of the physical condition of the sign, including an unsafe physical condition arising from the failure of the sign to be maintained, shall be removed. k. Registry of nonconforming signs. The owner of any property on which there is erected a nonconforming sign shall, upon notice from the zoning administrator, submit verification within sixty (60) days that the sign was lawfully in existence at the time of adoption of these sign regulations. The zoning administrator shall maintain a registry of such nonconforming signs. (12-10-80; 7-8-92, §§ 4.15.09.5, 4.15.10; Ord. 01-18(3), 5-9-01) State law reference— Va. Code � 15.2-2280. 18-4-50 Zoning Supplement # 15, 5-9-01 4_.-Y r. 1i: 1-m COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Depertmont of Inspectiana 401 McirrtIrs Road ChaeaftesUllle, Vfronla 22901.4596 (804) 2965832 Jude 22, 1988 LTohn A. Seaman, I= Assistant vice president Central Pidali,ty Bank 200 West Main Street P. o, BOX 138 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear box. Seamark Yau axe hereby advised that Building Permits no listed on the encloaed sheet have been issued fo bu3 a permits current-.y under COnstrection or already complete at par�tops Shopping Center. Sincerely, Willie Mae Hoover Administrative'Assistant cc: D. J. Wagner, Great Eastern Management Co. Enclosure BU I L O 1 Ne PERMITS AND QCCLjpj4NCY PERMITS PANTOPS SHOPP I NO CENTER CHARLOTTESVILLE4 VIRGINtA Addresses $ lfusinesses served $00-324 - Vacant 330-354 - Vacant 360-372 - Vacant 376 ^ Little Caesars 300 - Bun Seekers 364 - Pat Jungle Pet Jungle alldition 392 - Provident Finance 394 Vacant 396 - Ur-il's 4ry L'lsanere 104 - lei d's Vi 11 aae 509 - Radio Shack 512 - Frank 9arberia, ADS 314 - Awican speed Printing 516 - Vacant (was Nutri System) $20 - VDD Videa S24 - Chic Hair 332 - HOnrY's Restaurant Henry's aOdition 536 - Vacant (Was VIP) 440 - Revco Drag Storm 549 - Mitchell Cfflce Supply 560 - i:IOYd's Hallmark B70' - Food Lion )wilding Permit No, Date CBrtif, of 56-laS NC (Shen only) acrupanzy Y j* Q+w►x+� uere 66-107 MC (Shell only) °aft 1z, 1Rf'7 86-106 NC (shell only) Dec. 41 1907 07-857 AC Nov. 21 1987 81-1005 AG Nov. 5, I9e7 86-1366 AC DeC. 19, 1986 87-LO28 RC June 9, Igoe 87-3246 AC Nay. 51 1907 04-1396 AC Eawu+ ve.K�+ e�a.}e'8" B6-1397 AG HaY 6, 1987.7 85-67 AC Feb. 21, i76b 85-68 AC MaY 24, 1995 04-1503 A09. 27, 1987 e4-1006 AC floc. 30, 1985 84-1005 AC Aug- 27, 1907 Q4-504 AC Sep. 91 1984 84-445 AC NarCh in, 1986 64-503 AC Dec 31, 1985 84-27q AC hareh l8, i986 84-145 AC Der, 30, 1985 ,83-880 NC March lB, 19ab 85-1537 AC March 20, 1986 84-530 AC March i8, 1996 83-079 NC age. 30, 1?85 Sao - Vacant (Was Links) 8S-153 AC 592 - Curtis Mathes April 3, 1986 06 979 AC Auq. 27, 1997 FILEHAhE PERNTUT Page 1 Of 1 Subj., information Request . Pantops Shopping Center Date: 8/2/2004 3.24;58 PM Bastem Daylight Time From: ARTIN ema e. To: Cle-M WJQIAQo This email Is In response to a phone Call from Jamie Boyars. She requested Certif -ate of Occupancy dates on several building permit. unfortunately, the records from the early 80's are not great (and not compu*lzed) - here is what l have found: 1988-108NO - cannot verify data I986-107NC - C. 0, issued 1214/87 1986.106NC - C, 0. issued 12/4/87 'NO-1 396AC - cannot verify date 'here were several other permits that elan go along with this Shopping Center (86-105/86-104J86M103) which were all C, O.'d on )ecember 4, 1987. hope this heips. ;athy Martin ispections Division :ammunity Development 34-296-5832 Ext. 3550 Till-sday. September 07, 2004 America Online_- GEMC5 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JAMES R. SuTLER PATRICIA H. COOKE GERALD E FISHER J. T. HENLEY. in. C. TIMOTHY LINDSTROM ELLEN V. NASH A w OF ALSZ4, CGS I►A �Rcz i7 OFFICE OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 401 AACINTIRE ROAD CHARLOTTIMILLE. VIRGINIA 22907-4596 MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr., Director of Planning From: Lettie E. Neher, Clerk '�� Date: June 16, 1983• Subject: Riverbend Limited Partnership and Dr. Carlo Columbini ZMA-83-2 RICS a UtE. I .t u [i k 1983 PLANNING DEPT. BY LJ;ME E NEHER CLERK UNDA W. LEAK 4EPUTY CLERK BARBARAJ. FLAMMIA CEPUTY CLERK At its meeting of June 15, 1983, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors approved ZMA-83-2 subject to the following: A. MODIFICATIONS TO THIS REZONING PETITION 1) The Planned Development -Shopping Center designation should be expanded to incorporate additional developable land (Areas A. B and C, on plan entitled "Planning Staff Proposed Modification of ZMA-83-211) ; 2) Strip commercial areas surrounding the shopping center which cannot be reasonably developed without encroachment into the floodplain should be designated as "open space"; 3) The 100-year floodplain adjacent to the proposed development should be designated as "open space"; 4) For the purposes of this petition, the term "open space" is intended as a non -developable area'to be maintained in a natural state. Required improvements such as sewer lines, drainage facilities and the like should be permitted in ''open space" areas. Likewise, provision should be made for the continuance of the existing sand removal activity in this area. 3. "FINDINGS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8.0 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE 1) The suitability of -the tract for the general type of Planned Development district proposed in terms of: relation to the comprehensive plan; physical characteristics of the land; and its relation to surrounding area. 'Memo To: Robert W. Tucker,. Jr., Director of Planning Date: June 161, 1983 Page 2. Due to unknown characteristics of past grading activity, engineering study to determine suitability for construction is warranted. 2) Relation to major roads, utilities, public facilities and services. Based on comment from the Albemarle County Service Authority, Fire Official and the Virginia Department of Highways and' Transportation, these elements appear adequate to support the proposed shopping center development. 3) Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, deed restrictions, sureties, dedications, contributions, guarantees, or other instruments, or the need for such instruments or for amendments in those proposed (See Attachment G.) Staff is currently working with the applicant in development and revision agreements, guarantees, and the like intended to provide a basic framework for future development of this property. Basically, these documents would address the following: a) Agreement to develop property in general compliance with the approved Application Plan. Variations may be permitted as provided in Section 8.5.6.3 of the Zoning Ordinance; b) Statement of consent to pursue in a timely manner rezoning of additional land to PD-SC and "open space" as outlined in ''Saff Recommendation: Modification of Application Plan"; c) Agreement to modify design of the stormwater management system to include pollution abatement measures to the extent deemed reasonable by the County Engineer; including the use of grass filter strips in the floodplain areas on the west, south and east sides of the project; provided that such modifications may be incorporated without substantial increase -in cost of such system. Agreement to develop and pursue a site maintenance program to include a regular street sweeping program utilizing vacuum sweepers and to reflect practices recommended by the State Water Control Board "Urban Best Management Practices Handbook", such program to be reviewed by the County Engineer; f Vj r+ ' Memo To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., Director of Planning Date: June 16, 1983 Page 3• d) Revised agreement regarding road improvements and signalization. Riverbend Drive shall be accepted into the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportationts system or bonded for such acceptance prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy on Phase II of the Riverbend Shopping Center or the 2.9 acre parcel identified on the Application Plan ZMA-83-2, whichever certificate of occupancy shall be applied for first. Agreement to pursue additional planning in transportation matters as recomm- ended by the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation. bjf/ cc: Stuart Richard George St. John Bob Vaughn Ron -'.Keeler File COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Community Development 401 McIntire Road, Room 227 Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596 Phone (434) 296-5832 September 22, 2004 Steve Hopkins Great Eastern Management Company P.O. Box 5526 Charlottesville, VA 22905 RE: Tax Map 78, Parcel 17D Pantops Shopping Center Dear Mr. Hopkins: Fax (434) 9724126 You have asked for a letter that provides an analysis of the zoning and other information regarding the referenced property, located at the intersection of Riverbend Drive and South Pantops Drive in Charlottesville, VA. This letter is based on a review of our records and an inspection of the site. 1. The property is zoned PD-SC, Planned Development -Shopping Center. A copy of the action letter for ZMA-83-2 is enclosed. 2. SP-87-93 was approved, with a condition, on December 16, 1987 to allow a fast food restaurant with a drive through window on the parcel. SP-90-08 was approved, with conditions, on April 18, 1990 to allow a veterinary clinic on the parcel. 3. The parcels abutting the subject parcel are zoned PD-SC, Planned Development - Shopping Center and C-1, Commercial. 4. The free-standing shopping center sign is legally nonconforming because it exceeds 32 square feet and is taller than 12 feet. There are no other legal non- conforming issues identified on this site. A copy of Section 4.15.24 that contains the nonconforming sign regulations is enclosed. CADocuments and SettingAAkilmer\Local SettingATemporary Internet Fi1esl0LK271Comp-2004-13 Pantops Shopping Center (2).doc Steve Hopkins September 22, 2002 Page 2 5. The site has been developed in accord with a site plan designated as SDP-83-29 that was approved on June 7, 1983. The site plan was most recently amended on July 1, 2004. The site was inspected for zoning compliance on September 17, 2004. No violations were identified on the site on that date. 6. A review of our records does not show any unresolved zoning or building code violations and /or complaints. 7. A list of the Certificates of Occupancy that have been issued for this site was provided in a letter from Willie Mae Hoover dated June 22, 1988. That list was updated and clarified in an email from Kathy Martin dated September 2, 2004. It is the policy of this department to purge building permit files after three years. Copies of Certificates of Occupancy are maintained on microfilm. Therefore, we have not retained any copies of Certificates of Occupancy associated with this project. The absence of a Certificate of Occupancy for the project will not give rise to any enforcement action. Please be aware that interior renovation that does not involve a change of use does not require a Certificate of Occupancy. You may obtain a copy of a Certificate of Occupancy for an additional fee of $25.00 each. Sincerely, John Shepherd Manager of Zoning Administration Enclosures: Section 4.15.24 Willie Mae Hoover letter Kathy Martin letter ZMA-83-2 approval Copy: Reading File 78-17D CADocuments and SettingslAkilmer\Local SettingsWemporary Internet Fi]es10LK271Comp-2004-13 Pantops Shopping Center (2).doc 09 r_ 10:`2004 09: 55 FAX 434 972 4126 REQUEST FOR LET'S A. $LD CODE & ZONING OF ZONING COMPLXANCE WJu02 File it cam Date: PROPERTY OWNER: FEE: �75 Admin (waived) Non -administrate -e NAME: i! A Z" , ADDRESS: d .id r7„Y ��-{- G'a �n i ri � L�i1 a a go PHONE: APPLICANT: NAME: ADDRESS : PHONE: .,? - y! CONTACT PERSON: NAME, ADDRESS: DAY PHONE: 7 TAX MAP: Z, PARCEL (S) : J % 0 ZONED: j�*P-r C LOCATION: I ACREAGE: 1). (TOTAL) r (EACH PARCEL) EXISTING LAND USE: -<'. L YEAR BUILT: -7 A ,ozw _ r {k.,,�� SUBMITTAL REQUIR MENTS: 1) Approved/Recorded plat/plan, 2) Sample letter stating information lending institution or other party needs. Signature Applicant DATE '19j,ry &,C- / yip LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain parcel of land, with improvements thereon and all rights, privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging, situated in Albemarle. County, Virginia at the intersection of Riverbend Drive and South Pantops Drive designated as Parcel 17D containing 12.07265 acres as shown and descn'W on Sheet 2 of 2 of a plat prepared by B. Aubrey Huffman & Associates, Ltd., dated July 20, 1988, entitled "Plat Showing Remaining Acreages of Parcels 17D and 17G on Sheet 78 County Tax Maps, Albemarle County, Virginia, Rivanna Magisterial District", recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia in Deed Book 1021, Page 415 (and attached hereto as Exhibit A-1.) 05/03/04 - 16.19 R xX SK rY ra newel Ire$ 1. Va. Lree rr.rf AA wes.r$r seAee Poor E r.A/ ra Peree% Ira #lerreeel S1fag CAelsr O.R. RJR- dR teed tali r. s4lrr rrL AWoodApr i 1 ia*s� e!q - I'I' �; 'fir * • !�' � rALrerr./7ad ` ��� � IesrrAl $si.m .ia►7•lili ��wa rfvv►rrleArR04 *�I'•1 AARdd•1sa �F.� r.A, re Parr./ rose /.II O.A. . GMT FASTM 0004 r l.,V. Al AYrNf IrRY LVrrhs to Nrrr AR. !RO•ro0 leoe/ /are eh su r.a ra rrrrs I f r r R/rerAler doearlAe AW.r 0- A- 0L0-rri 7erer Paso �L ArARR♦Ira. MAIAfAIr� a C a• 97r1 aRNIIM/A'r ACi►Cl RF ar f'ARCIL AE M � +9. e ar`I aE A"Irf rO 1 ti IRa RECOIfr I /aw`.-I0, If` 4 PARCEL Ira ' Yew rorls /eRlYvt rm �, t ;%- reaars Ira-I1,arlrrMM. �; • • .9 � :�_ Irr Lear Co. o.a.trR.Iry JVer nrirrl ! %ar � auu olwc h t r. sduR Aare r.1A rs rsr. Iry r ar'< Mover r A I Avarr..• p Ilr ! As. rlr. &so 1 r,v.laha Prat r I•eIf Paso \ 1 a Rdrerif OIIre N me-w awa.w.a/.11 .nwwa 4N Lrel lrrrr -�� Eiwt (V z P.M. •.Ner Iyrr/ a O Iser rue► II v X 0. h PNt "rip I r1eAr 64. her .. . "am rr PORC � C S. • � S F 1 01704 RRMAINING ACREAGES OFFARCELD 1793 A 170 ON BURET 78 COUNTY TAX 14kplB ALNSAIARLII 0040TT . TIROIEs1A 41TANNA MA41 ITZRIAL B19TOI10T JOLT $ee logo • IA• age so@ •r• e•• Ago orara • agars 1• re• [Mamcm PAM B. AUMNEV UUPfr lAN A A$UOCIATAa . LrD. 00aM.1421 CIVIL t1901jiggglMe - LAM& •uiTEiTlr■ - LA110 •LAPIlrll0 ,Ga14ElLOTiaOTlLLf�. TIROIRIA , 14.25) , M2L11i,5 ahoe I a of a u4. U�.�1{ lU. 1J a-AiL 71 I Imuux CDYMTY OF AL/GNARLC COUNTY Dr LE C[ATIFIRAT109 rLwxxrMO CablUIaGION ■OARD of GuriRVINORG eala I■ a w■■NT Aae f 0 • if�e • �V w OY1rCN'N ArrROVAL ' the ev"M O■a or Tae LAM asaaelaQ arAm ■ e1rN TNe I,MR &ON■LaT Awe ■ ►seaN1ANCL MN TM ueaaT N IMG VIMLUHW94 ■■OCRa, FWA19T•OR 1119 IrMVIG. ALL aTATiaseTe ATRcra TO TOO PLAT Able T VL Ara ■SM&ST TO Tee ■CIT NV A■aTLa■■I. [ sr a ,4r- r r *AffQp. esoh-C4RAqLyW 474NUOK4 . ffacr,y CrnuNTV OF LaCIrAgL. , GTATC OF VIRaJR[A Ta-fIT. TPe ra Riaa a• INa [lyse■T Y e fRe101, JCaaLi aLra Ne Nc TNAaA'L OAT cr. raga. aT L A• •Yana raarareT•af •No$•• TeVaTem cT ■eacr■eua ceNACI / THE FAWeeLa GROWN BEN[ON ANE TO rw. re Abel! Ira GE SIRVTO WITH FtiftIC WATCA ANG ` P.ftrOF Re4& wer r v NO•, , NCWEA Aa■O AT TTNl 11119 THGNR AR6 /Jrr lager r/ `l ` aLWiR OR .ATEA CANSMINT■ aJTYATEO ON ARCELG A ; G. !°Ae�a` rar.ra Farrel rf*♦ rove lap r A a. � r,A•, re reetw ire r Ceaese# prA raaala/es � /WeeJATrlrl •rrrlt fAJ1, arl.00 %,`• N T.,R 11 hreei Ir/t � �. ya A'perreAe srrre . :� La.• r►rfI A PARCEL A e.r,rse.rss " O.43669 Aeedr I•ar/ lose • LY.71 AreedI IrOr rlrrl W. Iera ALA 4Tr4-ell Ieaal *pgO •eA. rr• r q••.r'. e'Y /r� PARCE.- 'i a r444 Aerrr ; r.1r, rI Flrrn / fr / R Nerhaa rsr. ripe m00%` reaer parse • - -- srrWer•eP •e r/, S ROVrE Paa is• rr IIr• IfieAu A•1I.K T.M. rl l.reve fro e.Peae T•++� A"lreroeet llryylvdCaagr r..t.N• P.P.Ill-Jd e.i•er�P- IaAad post rAC re par"( /rr R/►erN•I SO.War Iwlar R /. eel. afar/ i :dFaai AYla? 1 PLAT ■NOwIRA PANCELE A i B BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL* 170 a 170 ON SHRIFT TS COUNTY TAX MATS ALSGMAIILI QOIIMTt , Y1m4[[11A NIVANNA 11AGIIST9111AL bFurNICT 49LV 21, 1WG! ° °• lao CrO/ • ealO le ae ■. AURRVV HUFFMAN A ASSOCIATES . LTB. CIVIL 4111101MGGGINa - LaNN a"VGV11rS . LAR■ 16ANNIN4I ].L 4FIRRI,NTTNtY1LLN r WIRGIN1A Yrl� GNWgT I'at G I September ^, 2004 To: The Prudential Insurance Company of America Prudential Capital Group Two Ravinia Drive, Suite 1400 Atlanta, Georgia, 30346 CERTIFICATION OF ZONING Re: Land and improvements owned by Riverbend Limited Partnership or its assigns ("Owner") located in Albemarle County, Virginia at the intersection of Riverbend Drive and South Pantops Drive (the "Property"), which Property is described on Exhibit A attached hereto Dear Sir or Madam: I am the duly appointed and incumbent Zoning Administrator of Albemarle County, Virginia (the "Jurisdiction"), and I am responsible for the enforcement of the zoning ordinance of the Jurisdiction (the "Zoning Ordinance") and otherwise have knowledge of the facts required to give this certification. I am familiar with the Property described above. Based upon my review of the Zoning Ordinance and all other resolutions, variances, conditions and records applicable to the Property, I hereby certify the following: 1. Zoning District. The Property is zoned Planned District -Shopping Center (PD- SC) under the laws or ordinances of the Jurisdiction, which zoning is the proper zoning for the improvements located on the Property. Attached hereto as Exhibit B are true copies of the applicable ordinances, resolutions or regulations relating to the zoning and use of the Property and all conditions attached to such zoning and to the development of the Property. The Property is in compliance with all of the aforesaid ordinances, resolutions, regulations and conditions. 2. Use Restrictions. Use of the Property for commercial and retail_purposes is permitted under the Zoning Ordinance. The Property is not a non -conforming use. No special use permits, conditional use permits, variances or exceptions have been granted nor are needed to use the Property for the current use thereof. The Property is not located in any special districts such as historical districts. 3. Dimensional R uirements. The Property is in compliance with all dimensional requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, including, but not limited to, minimum lot area, maximum building height, maximum floor area ratio and setback or buffer requirements. 4. Parking Requirements. The Property is in compliance with all parking and Ioading requirements, including the number of spaces (869 for this Property and the Roses parcel based on a recently approved Minor Site Plan amendment originally dated January 18, 1994 [the date of the last amendment to the plan], last revised May 28, 2004) and dimensional requirements for the parking spaces. 5. Screening and Landscaping Re uirements. The Property is in compliance with all screening and landscaping requirements. 6. Sign R uirements. The Property is in compliance with all sign requirements, including height of signs, size of signage, signage setback requirements and any other signage restrictions. 7. Access. Access to the Property is from a publicly dedicated and accepted right of way and all driveways from the Property onto such right of way are in compliance with all applicable driveway ordinances and regulations and all permits, if any, required in connection therewith have been issued. 8. Certificate of Occupancy. Final, permanent and unconditional Certificates of Occupancy were duly issued for the Property, a schedule of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 9. No Violations. There are no existing violations with respect to the Property of the Zoning Ordinance or any other applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and codes, including, but not limited to, building codes, fire codes, environmental codes and safety codes. 10. Subdivision Requirements. The Property is in compliance with all applicable subdivision requirements, and any and all plats, permits and approvals necessary to subdivide the Property from any tract or parcel of land adjacent thereto and now or heretofore owned in common with the owner of the Property have been duly and properly filed, recorded and/or issued. Neither conveyance of the Property by a mortgage instrument nor subsequent foreclosure or deed in lieu thereof will cause the Property to violate any subdivision requirements. Name: Amelia G. McCulley Title: Zoning Administrator G;\DOCS\WPIRNERBEND\Fbmcingo4\Prudential\ClosingDocs129.ZoningVerificationComplianceLetter.DOC P)