Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB201700071 Review Comments Final Plat 2017-08-01County of Albemarle Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Frederick A. Gibson From: Paty Saternye- Senior Planner Division: Planning Services Date: June 26, 2017 REV. 1: August 1, 2017 Subject: SUB-2017-71 Stanley J. Thomas - Boundary Line Adjustment The County of Albemarle Planning Division will grant or recommend approval of the Final Plat referenced above once the following comments have been addressed: [Each comment is preceded by the applicable reference, which is to the Subdivision/Zoning Ordinances unless otherwise specified.] 1. [Comment] Attached find the Boundary Line Adjustment checklist. The comments listed below are items either not included in the plat or that need revisions to what has been provided. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 2. [14-302(A)(1)] Name of Subdivision. Rename the subdivision plat so that it includes unique identifiers such as including in the name the specific tax map parcel numbers impacted by the plat. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 3. [14-302(A)(2)] Vicinity map. Include a vicinity map in the place as specified (see attached checklist). REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 4. [14-302(A)(3)] Existing or platted streets. It appears from the proposed plat that a portion of State Route 640 is partially a prescriptive easement and partially a right-of-way. However, the labels only specify a prescriptive easement. County GIS appears to show prescriptive easements across all road frontages. Clarify the status of the road along the frontage of all lots and revise the notes and/or the road right-of-way lines and prescriptive easement lines to fully represent the road as appropriate. Show Grove Hill Lane on the plat and label it as specified in (See 14-303(E) below). REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 5. [14-302(A)(4)] Private Easements. There appears from the County's GIS to be a private road that cross TMP 66-73A into TMP 66-75 and TMP 66-74. A road, possibly where Grove Hill Lane is shown on the GIS, also appears to be shown on the plat included in Deed Book 439 Page 321. This should be shown on the plat if it currently serves TMP 66-75 as its access to the public road and/or crosses through the portion of TMP 66-75 that is being added to TMP 66-73A. If it is shown then all required information on the road and any easement for the road, including road name, owner and deed book and page number of the easement plat, should be provided (See 14-303(E) below). REV. 1: Comment addressed. 6. [14-302(A)(5) & 14-303(L)] Public Easements; Public utility, drainage and sight distance easements. Revise the plat to show any existing public easements. The plat included in Deed Book 439 plPage 321 shows an existing underground telephone cable (Deed Book 356 Page 154) that may reside on the portion of the parcel that is being given to TMP 66-76 and therefore should be shown on the BLA plat. REV. 1: Comment, Addressed. 7. [14-302(A)(6)] Alleys and shared driveways. Revise the plat to show any driveway that crosses a subject properties to reach a different property. If it is a shared driveway that too should be specified (See 14-303(E) below). REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 8. [14-302(A)(7)] Existing and departing lot lines. Address the following: • The existing property lines shown on the proposed plat, and those shown on the recorded plat recorded in Deed Book 439 Page 323, do not match those shown on the County's online GIS or County Tax Maps. Please confirm that the County's GIS is incorrect and that the most resent plat for the property is Deed Book 439 Page 323. • In the recorded plat at Deed Book 4548 Page 270 the existing southwestern property line for TMP 66-75 appears to come from the back of TMP 66-76 and not from the road. Please confirm that this is not correct since it does not agree with the proposed plat. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 9. [14-302(A)(9)] Building sites on proposed lots. Address the following: • Add a building site note to the plat that states "Parcels [letter or numbers] each contain a building site that complies with section 4.2.1 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance." Include each of the parcels impacted by this plat in that note. • Add a building site rectangle to the plat for TMP 66-75 since the parcel is reducing in size. As specified in the Code that building site rectangle should be 30,000 square feet in size and meet the minimum requirements specified in 4.2.1(A) & 4.2.2(A)(1) of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 10. [14-302(A)(10)] Right of further division of proposed lots. Provide a note that specifies the current and proposed right of further division for each of the parcels that is modified in this plat. If no development rights for a specific parcel are transferred with the transfer of land the existing development rights and a statement that not development rights are transferred still need to be specified in a note. REV. 1: Comment not fully addressed. The development rights specified in the notes are not correct. It appears that TMP 66-75 was last subdivided or changed prior to 1980. If this is correct then the same number of development rights as were assigned in 1980 are still assigned to the parcel, as specified in "A Citizen's How To Manual" on development rights that I sent with the last round of comments. If it is correct that boundary lines of TMP 66-75 have not changed since 1980 then revise the two development rights notes to state the following: • Tax Map Parcel 66-75 contains four development rights and may be further divided. • The development rights for Tax Map Parcels 66-73A 66-74 & 66-76 are not being changed or modified by this plat. Please note for future reference: A parcel having development rights does not guarantee that it can be subdivided in the future The proposed parcel(s) must also meet all other ordinances and code requirements. 2 11. [14-302(A)(15)] Identification of all owners and certain interest holders. Provide the name and addresses for each owner of the parcels as well as he holders of any easements affecting the property. REV. 1: Comment not fully addressed. In the "Notes" area there appears to be redundant information provided for TMP 66-73A. Please remove the redundant information. 12. [14-302(B)(1)] General information. Provide on the plat the date of the plat, any revision dates for the plat and, if applicable, the number of sheets that are part of the plat. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 13. [14-302(B)(5)] Zoning classification. Provide a note on the plat that states the zoning classification of each of the properties. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 14. [14-302(B)(7)] Reservoir watershed; agricultural -forestal district. Provide on the plat a note stating which watershed the property is in and whether it is within the "watershed supply protection area". REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 15. [14-302(B)(10)] Stream buffers. Provide on the plat a note that states "The stream buffer(s) shown heron shall be managed in accordance with the Albemarle County Water Protection Ordinance." REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 16. [14-303(A)] Statement of consent to division. Provide on the plat, for each parcel impacted by the plat, a statement of consent to division for each owner of the specific parcel and with a place for the owner's signature below the statement. The note should read "The platting or dedication of the following described land [insert a correct description of the land subdivided] is with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of the undersigned owners, proprietors and trustees, if any." For each parcel the note must be unique including the description of that parcel in the area specified for the description to be inserted. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 3 17. [14-303(C) & 14-303(H)j Boundary lines; Monuments. Clarify if the boundary line between TMP 66-75 and TMP 66-74 is a "proposed" parcel line or an existing one and adjust the plat to represent it accordingly. Address the following: It is shown with the same linetype as the "proposed" parcel lines and there is an "Old parcel line" labeled next to it. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. No "Parcel X" label has been included to identify the area. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. • No calculation is shown for how much property would be transferred between the two parcels with the proposed boundary change. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. • It appears to have "Pipe Found" along its edge that would seem to mean it is an existing boundary line. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. • [REVA: NEW COMMENTI There is conflicting information on the proposed acreage for TMP 66-75. The information that is shown within the parcel boundary, showing all of the additions, subtractions and the outcome, appears to be correct. However, on the right side of the page, the paragraph that starts with "Parcel `B' 0.0962 AC" has a different acreage shown for TMP 66-75 that appears to be wrong. Also, no information is shown on the acreage of TMP 66-74 after `D' is added to it. Address the following: o Since the information on the acreage of TMP 66-75 is already shown within the area of its parcel boundaries it is not also needed on the far right of the plat where information on "A" and "C" are provided. o Add information for "Parcel `D' 0.2827 AC" to the right side of the plat. This entry should also specify the acreage of TMP66-74 after consolidation. 18. [14-303(C) & 14-303(H)j Boundary lines; Monuments. Clarify if the boundary line between TMP 66-75, TMP 66-76 and TMP 66-78 is changing. Address the following: • As mentioned above, the existing property lines shown on the proposed plat, and those shown on the recorded plat recorded in Deed Book 439 Page 323, do not match those shown on the County's online GIS or County Tax Maps. Please confirm that the County's GIS is incorrect and that the property lines represented in this plat are the most current. • The 192.91' long property line to the adjoining church property (TMP 66- 78) is shown as a "Proposed" parcel line style but the source plat specified shows it as existing. • There are two new "Rod set" labels along the property line when for an existing lot line two "rod found" labels would be expected. o If any property is being added to TMP 66-76 from TMP 66-78 then TMP 66-78 and its owners should be added to the calculations, owner information, consent to division, etc. for the plat. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 19. [14-303(D)] Acreage of lots. Revise the plat to address the following: + Show the existing acreage of TMP 66-75. + Show the calculations for the changes in acreage for TMP 66-75. �- There is a label that shows "2.7685 Acres" that is shown within TMP 66- 75. Either remove this label or clarify what it is for. + If there is property being moved from TMP 66-75 and TMP 66-74 show the size of the area being transferred, the proposed size of TMP 66-74 and include this area as being subtracted in the calculations for TMP 66- 75. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 20. [14-303(E)] Dimension standards and information on all lots, streets, alleys easements, and shared driveways. Revise the plat to include all required dimensions and information. See the attached Boundary Line Adjustment Plat Checklist for all of the required information but it includes: • Easement shown for private streets, alleys and shared driveways shall be labeled as "private street easement", "alley easement" or "shared driveway easement". + The easement holder(s) shall be identified on the plat. If there are any existing easement along any private streets, alleys or shared driveways provide the required information for those easements as specified in 14-302(A)(4). REV. 1: Comment addressed. 21. [14-303(F)] Identification of sections, blocks and lots. Provide a label for the portion of TMP 66-75 that is being given to TMP 66-74. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 22. [14-303(0)] Signature Panels. Provide on the plat signature panels for each owner of parcels impacted by this plat and for the County agent. REV. 1: Comment not vet fully addressed. The plat was updated to include a signature panel for each of the owners. However, the signature panel for the County agent's signature has not vet been added. Attached to this comment letter please find an example of what the signature panel for the County agent looks like. Add a signature panel for the agent to the plat 23. [14-303(P)] Notary panels. Provide notary panels for the notary to acknowledge the signature for each of the owners. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. However, please be aware that additional notary seal areas may be required if the different owners for the same lot are not signing the plat in the same day at the same time. 24. [14-312] Location of existing buildings. Provide the location of any existing building within 50' or any proposed boundary line. REV. 1: Comment Addressed. 25. [14-400] Minimum Lot Requirements. Address the following: • Provide on the plat the front boundary line for TMP 66-73A & TMP 66-76. • Ensure that the reduction of it road frontage does not bring it to below the minimum allowed road frontage. REV. 1: Commofft Addressed. Please contact P at the Department of Community Development 296-5832 ext. 3250 for fu�the i finye ation. CC: Stanley J. Thomas