The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutARB201700064 Staff Report 2017-07-31ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project #/Name ARB-2017-64: Riverside Village Block 1 Review Type Initial Site Plan Parcel Identification 078G00001000A0 Location West of Trailside Drive and south of Trailside Court in the Riverside Village development located between Rt. 20, Elk Drive, and Free Bridge Lane. Block 1 is located adjacent to Rt. 20. Zoned Neighborhood Model District (NMD)/Entrance Corridor (EC) Owner/Applicant Riverside Village Properties, Inc./Justin Shimp Magisterial District Rivanna Proposal To construct three two-story retail/office buildings with associated site improvements. Context and Visibility Block 1 fronts the Rt. 20 EC and will be readily visible from the EC. When the Block 1 buildings are completed, they will limit some of the views into the overall site. The surrounding area is a mix of development with commercial sites to the south, residential to the east, parkland to the north, and the river to the west. ARB Meeting Date August 7, 2017 Staff Contact Heather McMahon PROJECT HISTORY DATE APPLICATION RESULT 7/16/2008 ARB-2008-106 Staff comments provided on the rezoning proposal. 3/17/2014 ARB-2014-07 ARB review of the initial site plan for Blocks 2, 3 and 4. 11/24/2014 ARB-2014-94 ARB approval of the final site plan for Blocks 2, 3 and 4, including landscaping along the Rt. 20 frontage. 7/20/2015 ARB-2015-76 Subdivision entrance signs approved. 8/3/2015 ARB-2015-85 Minor revisions to the architectural design of the attached units in Block 2 approved. 9/8/2015 ARB-2015-91 ARB review of the initial site plan for Block 5. 1/28/2016 ARB-2015-124 Block 5 Certificate of Appropriateness issued. 4/18/2016 ARB-2016-29 ARB preliminary review of Block 1. 5/10/2017 ZMA-2016-19 BOS approval of request to increase number of units; decrease total amount of commercial square footage; subdivide one 5,000 square -foot plaza into multiple plazas totaling 5,000 square feet; reduce the minimum build -to line on Trailside Drive; make accessory uses and buildings by -right rather than by special use permit; modify proffers to provide 15% affordable units in Block 1; and provide a cash proffer for the 36 additional units of $7,419.91 for each new multi -family dwelling unit. 8/7/2017 ARB2017-64 ARB review of initial site plan for Block 1. A number of houses and the apartment building have been constructed and some landscaping is in place. The ARB completed a preliminary review of Riverside Village, Block 1 on April 18, 2016 (included as Attachment A). At that meeting, their comments focused on attaining more information on the design of the proposed buildings, in which they asked the applicants to submit material and color samples, dimensioned elevations, and a landscape plan with complete grading and a plant schedule for review at a future date. CHANGES TO THE PLAN SINCE THE LAST REVIEW The current proposal differs in one fundamental way from the preliminary design the ARB reviewed in April 2016: whereas that conceptual design had three buildings arranged linearly and a 5,000- square-foot central plaza (between the northernmost and central buildings) on a cardinal axis with the pedestrian path west of the proposed parking, the present configuration has four plazas totaling 5,000 square feet flanking the three buildings. Each plaza is rectangular or square in plan; the southeastern corner of the southernmost plaza is chamfered, acknowledging the corner of the entrance drive, while the two middle plazas are bisected by turf -lawn strips. This scheme also differs from the conceptual design exhibited in ZMA-2016-19, in which two buildings were flanked by a total of three plazas. Like that conceptual site plan, this current plan shows a pedestrian connection (a 10.67-foot wide brick walkway) running diagonally, west to east, across the parking lot, connecting the extant pedestrian path to the northernmost plaza. Unlike the preliminary site plan exhibited in ARB-2016-29, however, none of the plazas show any formal design concept. The amount of commercial space has also been reduced from 16,000 square feet total to 8,000 square feet while each building has been allotted eight residential units above the first -floor commercial spaces. The parking area and access configuration is largely the same in the current proposal as in the previous submission, except for the parking lot planting: while the previous submission showed 26 canopy trees, the current submission proposes 24 pin oaks. ANALYSIS Gray highlight = means the guideline can't be reviewed at initial site plan stage, but recommendations can be provided for final Yellow highlight = means the guideline can only be reviewed for location/configuration at the initial plan stage Regular text = means the guideline can be reviewed at initial plan stage, can be made a condition of initial plan approval, and can be the basis for denial REF GUIDELINE ARB COMMENTS CURRENT ISSUE RECOMMENDATION 4/18/16 Purpose 1 The goal of the regulation of the design of development within the designated See recommendations No architectural renderings or elevations have See recommendations Entrance Corridors is to insure that new development within the corridors reflects below. been submitted with this application. below. the traditional architecture of the area. Therefore, it is the purpose of ARB review However, what shallow reliefs the building and of these Guidelines, that proposed development within the designated footprints displayed in the previous Entrance Corridors reflect elements of design characteristic of the significant submission have been replaced with planar i� al larks, buildings, and structures of the Charlottesville and walls lacking architectural relief. Albemarle area, and to promote orderly and attractive development within thesi corridors. Applicants should note that replication of historic structures is neither required nor desired. 2 Visitors to the significant historical sites in the Charlottesville and Albemarle area experience these sites as ensembles of buildings, land, and vegetation. In order to accomplish the integration of buildings, land, and vegetation characteristic of these sites, the Guidelines require attention to four primary factors: compatibility with significant historic sites in the area; the character of the Entrance Corridor; site development and layout; and landscaping. Compatibility with significant historic sites: 3 New structures and substantial additions to existing structures should respect the 1-3. Submit material and Architectural information has not been Submit material and color traditions of the architecture of historically significant buildings in the _ color samples, elevations, submitted with the initial site plan. samples, dimensioned Charlottesville and Albemarle area. Photographs of historic buildings in the area, and floor plans for elevations, and floor as well as drawings of architectural features, which provide important examples of review. plans for review. this tradition are contained in Appendix A. 4 The examples contained in Appendix A should be used as a guide for building design: the standard of compatibility with the area's historic structures is not intended to impose a rigid design solution for new development. Replication of the design of the important historic sites in the area is neither intended nor desired. The Guideline's standard of compatibility can be met through building scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The Guidelines allow individuality in design to accommodate varying tastes as well as special functional requirements. Compatibility with the character of the Entrance Corridor 5 It is also an important objective of the Guidelines to establish a pattern of None. Compatibility can be achieved through mass, None. compatible architectural characteristics throughout the Entrance Corridor ir'� scale, form, and materiality. Sensitivity can be to achieve unity and coherence. Building designs should demonstrate sensitivity achieved through siting, spatial organization, to other nearby structures within the Entrance Corridor. Where a designated and landscaping as well as through corridor is substantially developed, these Guidelines require striking a careful architectural design that alludes to local balance between harmonizing new development with the existing character of the architectural precedents through form, corridor and achieving compatibility with the significant historic sites in the area. materiality, or style. The degree to which this is accomplished can be determined when architectural designs are submitted for review. Site development and layout 6 Site development should be sensitive to the existing natural landscape and should None. Frontage landscaping (along the Entrance None. contribute to the creation of an organized development plan. This may be Corridor, Rt. 20) as well as planting on the accomplished, to the extent practical, by preserving the trees and rolling terrain site's southeastern corner and northern end typical of the area; planting new trees along streets and pedestrian ways and have been approved previously and have been choosing species that reflect native forest elements; insuring that any grading will partially installed to date. blend into the surrounding topography thereby creating a continuous landscape; preserving, to the extent practical, existing significant river and stream valleys The three mixed -use buildings on this block which may be located on the site and integrating these features into the design of are intended to be 2-3 stories, which is surrounding development; and limiting the building mass and height to a scale compatible with contemporary development that does not overpower the natural settings of the site, or the Entrance Corridor. on this corridor. Landscaping 7 The requirements of the Guidelines regarding landscaping are intended to reflect None. Landscaping along the EC street was None. the landscaping characteristic of many of the area's significant historic sites which approved with the first phase of development. is characterized by large shade trees and lawns. Landscaping should promote Large trees have been planted along the visual order within the Entrance Corridor and help to integrate buildings into the Entrance Corridor and the southeastern corner existing environment of the corridor. of the block has been landscaped; however, smaller plantings along the Entrance Corridor 8 Continuity within the Entrance Corridor should be obtained by planting different types of plant materials that share similar characteristics. Such common elements and the landscaping on the hillside north of allow for more flexibility in the design of structures because common landscape the block have not been planted yet. features will help to harmonize the appearance of development as seen from the street upon which the Corridor is centered. SPECIFIC GUIDELINES Compatibility with significant historic sites Structure design 9 Building forms and features, including roofs, windows, doors, materials, colors None. The degree to which compatibility with local, None. and textures should be compatible with the forms and features of the significant historic precedents is accomplished can be historic buildings in the area, exemplified by (but not limited to) the buildings determined when architectural designs are described in Appendix A [of the design guidelines]. The standard of compatibility submitted for review. can be met through scale, materials, and forms which may be embodied in architecture which is contemporary as well as traditional. The replication of important historic sites in Albemarle County is not the objective of these guidelines. 10 Buildings should relate to their site and the surrounding context of buildings. 12 Architecture proposed within the Entrance Corridor should use forms, shapes, scale, and materials to create a cohesive whole. 11 The overall design of buildings should have human scale. Scale should be integral 2. Provide dimensioned Architectural information has not been Provide dimensioned to the building and site design. elevations for review. submitted with the initial site plan. elevations for review. 13 Any appearance of "blankness" resulting from building design should be relieved 3. Provide complete side Eliminate blankness in the planar elevations Eliminate blankness in using design detail or vegetation, or both. elevations for review. by incorporating architectural detailing and the planar elevations by Eliminate blankness in relief. incorporating the side elevations by architectural detailing and incorporating relief architectural detailing. 14 Arcades, colonnades, or other architectural connecting devices should be used to None. No architectural connecting devices are None. unify groups of buildings within a development. evident in the plans submitted. 15 Trademark buildings and related features should be modified to meet the None. There is no evidence of a trademark design in None. requirements of the Guidelines. the submitted drawings. 16 Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should not be highly tinted or highly 4. Add the standard Architectural information has not been Add the standard window reflective. Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following window glass note to the submitted with the initial site plan. glass note to the criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 4001o. Visible light drawings. architectural drawings. reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. Specifications on the proposed window glass should be submitted with the application for final reviDs Accessory structures and equipment 17 Accessory structures and equipment should be integrated into the overall plan of None. Sidewalks, steps, and ramps are well Revise the plans to show development and shall, to the extent possible, be compatible with the building integrated. Equipment has not been addressed. all loading and service esigns used on the site. The new dumpster pad's location on the site's areas, storage areas, mechanical equipment 18 The following should be located to eliminate visibility from the Entrance Corridor street. If, after appropriate siting, these features will still have a negative visual southwestern corner may be visible from the (ground- and roof - impact on the Entrance Corridor street, screening should be provided to eliminate Entrance Corridor. The dumpster enclosure mounted), above -ground visibility. a. Loading areas, b. Service areas, c. Refuse areas, d. Storage areas, e. detail shows a brick wall and treated wood utilities, and any Mechanical equipment, f. Above -ground utilities, and g. Chain link fence, barbed gates. Additional landscaping may be proposed fencing. Show wire, razor wire, and similar security fencing devices. necessary to integrate the dumpster into the surroundings. how visibility of all equipment will be 19 Screening devices should be compatible with the design of the buildings and surrounding natural vegetation and may consist o£ eliminated. a. Walls, b. Plantings, and c. Fencing. Provide landscaping at the dumpster to integrate it into the surroundings. 20 Surface runoff structures and detention ponds should be designed to fit into the None. N/A: stormwater management features are None. natural topography to avoid the need for screening. When visible from the Entrance located on other blocks and were approved Corridor street, these features must be fully integrated into the landscape. They with previous reviews. should not have the appearance of engineered features. 21 The following note should be added to the site plan and the architectural plan: 5. Add the standard Note is provided on the cover sheet of the site Include the mechanical "Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be mechanical equipment plan set. It will also be needed on the equipment note on the eliminated." note to both the site and architectural drawings. architectural drawings. architectural drawings. Lighting None at this time. Although Sheet C7 is labeled "Lighting Plan," Submit a lighting plan the submission includes no lighting which includes all information. proposed free-standing and wall -mounted lights with the final site plan. Landscaping 32 Landscaping along the frontage of Entrance Corridor streets should include the, None. Landscaping along the EC street was None. following: approved with the first phase of development. a. Large shade trees should be planted parallel to the Entrance Corridor Street. Large trees have been planted along the Such trees should be at least 3 %2 inches caliper (measured 6 inches above the Entrance Corridor and the southeastern corner ground) and should be of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be of the block has been landscaped; however, located at least every 35 feet on center. smaller plantings along the Entrance Corridor b. Flowering ornamental trees of a species common to the area should be and the landscaping on the hillside north of interspersed among the trees required by the preceding paragraph. The ornamental the block have not been planted yet. trees need not alternate one for one with the large shade trees. They may be planted among the large shade trees in a less regular spacing pattern. c. In situations where appropriate, a three or four board fence or low stone wall, typical of the area, should align the frontage of the Entrance Corridor street. d. An area of sufficient width to accommodate the foregoing plantings and fencing should be reserved parallel to the Entrance Corridor street, and exclusive of road right-of-way and utility easements. 33 Landscaping along interior roads: None. There are large gaps in the spacing of street Add street trees in the a. Large trees should be planted parallel to all interior roads. Such trees should be trees along Trailside Drive (where sidewalk is gaps along the north side at least 2'/2 inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be also provided) in the vicinity of the entry into of Trailside Drive in the of a plant species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every the Block 1 parking lot. Utilities and vicinity of the entrance 40 feet on center. easements exist in this area. into the Block 1 parking lot. 34 Landscaping along interior pedestrian ways: None. a. Medium trees should be planted parallel to all interior pedestrian ways. Such trees should be at least 2'/Z inches caliper (measured six inches above the ground) and should be of a species common to the area. Such trees should be located at least every 25 feet on center. 35 Landscaping of parking areas: 6. Add shrubs along the The northern edge of the block has sufficient Add shrubs along the a. Large trees should align the perimeter of parking areas, located 40 feet on parking lot where proposed planting, but the other edges of the eastern edge of the center. Trees should be planted in the interior of parking areas at the rate of one buildings do not block parking lot lack perimeter planting. Trees are parking lot where tree for every 10 parking spaces provided and should be evenly distributed parking spaces from the solely provided in islands within the parking buildings do not block throughout the interior of the parking area. EC. It. The number of proposed trees (24) exceeds parking spaces from the b. Trees required by the preceding paragraph should measure 2'/2 inches caliper' the requirement of one tree per ten parking EC. (measured six inches above the ground); should be evenly spaced; and should be spaces, as this lot has 118 spaces (12 trees of a species common to the area. Such trees should be planted in planters or necessary). On -center distances on the eastern medians sufficiently large to maintain the health of the tree and shall be protected edge of the parking lot average 75'; there is by curbing. no planting area on west side of the parking c. Shrubs should be provided as necessary to minimize the parking area's impact lot. on Entrance Corridor streets. Shrubs should measure 24 inches in height. 36 Landscaping of buildings and other structures: 7. Provide side elevations No plantings to soften the appearance of the Provide side elevations a. Trees or other vegetation should be planted along the front of long buildings as for review. Additional buildings' exteriors have been proposed. The for review. Additional necessary to soften the appearance of exterior walls. The spacing, size, and type of landscaping may be designs of the plazas are minimalist. The landscaping may be such trees or vegetation should be determined by the length, height, and blankness needed to soften the Code of Development includes a provision for needed to soften the of such walls. appearance of exterior four (4) benches and landscaping in amenity appearance of exterior b. Shrubs should be used to integrate the site, buildings, and other structures; walls. areas, while the ZMA(2016-19) approval walls. dumpsters, accessory buildings and structures; "drive thru" windows; service stipulated that the plazas must have two (2) areas; and signs. Shrubs should measure at least 24 inches in height. benches and one plaza must create a focal Provide benches and point. The northernmost plaza, which acts as a landscaping in all plazas. terminus for the pedestrian connection, is a Design the northernmost logical choice for the location of the focal plaza as a focal point of point. The preliminary site plan for this block the block. proposed a formally -designed central plaza with raised planting beds which has been deleted from this submission. The previously submitted formal landscape design vocabulary — or another equally elaborated design — would be appropriate in this open space. The swathes of turf lawn are extremely minimal and aren't sufficient to create a focal point. Additional planting beds would soften the plazas' hardscaping. The site plan set delineates the pedestrian Correct the site plans so connection which bisects the parking lot, but that the pedestrian the materials are not consistent (i.e., multiple connection is a single materials, such as asphalt and concrete, are material. specified). The pedestrian path should be a single material. Brick was specified in the conceptual plan for ZMA2016-19. 37 Plant species: 8. Provide a plant A plant schedule appears on Sheet C6. None. a. Plant species required should be as approved by the Staff based upon but not schedule on the plan for limited to the Generic Landscape Plan Recommended Species List and Native review. Plants for Virginia Landscapes (Appendix D). 38 Plant health: 9. Add the standard plant The note appears on Sheet C6. None. The following note should be added to the landscape plan: "All site plantings of health note to the trees and shrubs shall be allowed to reach, and be maintained at, mature height; drawings. the topping of trees is prohibited. Shrubs and trees shall be pruned minimally and only to support the overall health of theplant." Site Development and layout Development paftern 39 The relationship of buildings and other structures to the Entrance Corridor street None. The development exhibits an organized None. and to other development within the corridor should be as follows: pattern of roads, service lanes, and pedestrian a. An organized pattern of roads, service lanes, bike paths, and pedestrian walks walks. Buildings fronting the Entrance should guide the layout of the site. Corridor are parallel to the street. A proposed b. In general, buildings fronting the Entrance Corridor street should be parallel to pedestrian connection links this block with the street. Building groupings should be arranged to parallel the Entrance Corridor development to the west. Open spaces are street. provided by four plazas totaling 5,000 square c. Provisions should be made for connections to adjacent pedestrian and vehicular feet. circulation systems. d. Open spaces should be tied into surrounding areas to provide continuity within the Entrance Corridor. e. If significant natural features exist on the site (including creek valleys, steep slopes, significant trees or rock outcroppings), to the extent practical, then such natural features should be reflected in the site layout. If the provisions of Section 32.5.6.n of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance apply, then improvements required by that section should be located so as to maximize the use of existing features in screening such improvements from Entrance Corridor streets. f. The placement of structures on the site should respect existing views and vistas on and around the site. Site Grading 40 Site grading should maintain the basic relationship of the site to surrounding 10. Show complete The site has already been graded and the None. conditions by limiting the use of retaining walls and by shaping the terrain through grading on the plan. proposed grading is consistent with previous the use of smooth, rounded land forms that blend with the existing terrain. Steep cut approvals. or fill sections are generally unacceptable. Proposed contours on the grading plan shall be rounded with a ten foot minimum radius where they meet the adjacent condition. Final grading should achieve a natural, rather than engineered, appearance. Retaining walls 6 feet in height and taller, when necessary, shall be terraced and planted to blend with the landscape. 41 No grading, trenching, or tunneling should occur within the drip line of any trees or None. All pre-existing trees have been cleared from None. other existing features designated for preservation in the final Certificate of the site; some trees have been planted along Appropriateness. Adequate tree protection fencing should be shown on, and the Entrance Corridor (Rt. 20) coordinated throughout, the grading, landscaping and erosion and sediment control plans. 42 Areas designated for preservation in the final Certificate of Appropriateness should be clearly delineated and protected on the site prior to any grading activity on the site. This protection should remain in place until completion of the development of the site. 43 Preservation areas should be protected from storage or movement of heavy equipment within this area. 44 Natural drainage patterns (or to the extent required, new drainage patterns) should be incorporated into the finished site to the extent possible. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following as the primary points of discussion: 1. The need for supplemental landscaping on each plaza and a formal design vocabulary on the northernmost plaza. Staff recommends that the ARB forward the following recommendations to the Agent for the Site Review Committee: • Regarding requirements to satisfy the design guidelines as per § 18-30.6.4c(2), (3) and (5) and recommended conditions of initial plan approval:. 1. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. • Regarding recommendations on the plan as it relates to the guidelines: None. • Regarding conditions to be satisfied prior to issuance of a grading permit: None. • Regarding the final site plan submittal: 1. Architecture and landscaping will be reviewed with a future submittal. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required prior to final site plan approval. 2. Provide material and color samples, dimensioned elevations, and floor plans for review. 3. Eliminate blankness in the planar elevations by incorporating architectural detailing and relief 4. Add the standard window glass note to the drawings: Window glass in the Entrance Corridors should meet the following criteria: Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not drop below 4001o. Visible light reflectance (VLR) shall not exceed 30%. 5. Revise the plans to show all loading and service areas, storage areas, mechanical equipment (ground- and roof -mounted), above -ground utilities, and any proposed fencing. Show how visibility of all equipment will be eliminated. 6. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to the architectural drawings: Visibility of all mechanical equipment from the Entrance Corridor shall be eliminated. 7. Provide a lighting plan which includes all proposed free-standing and wall -mounted lights with the final site plan. 8. Provide landscaping at the dumpster to integrate it into the surroundings. 9. Add street trees in the gaps along the north side of Trailside Drive in the vicinity of the entrance into the Block 1 parking lot. 10. Add shrubs along the eastern edge of the parking lot where buildings do not block parking spaces from the EC. 11. Provide side elevations for review. Additional landscaping may be needed to soften the appearance of exterior walls. 12. Provide at least two (2) benches and landscaping in all plazas. Design the northernmost plaza as a focal point of the block. 13. Correct the site plans so that the pedestrian connection is a single material. TABLE A This report is based on the following submittal items: Sheet # Drawing Name Drawing Date Cl Cover 6/16/2017 C2 Approved Proffers & Lot Regulations 6/16/2017 C3 I Existing conditions & Demo Plan 6/16/2017 C4 Site Plan 6/16/2017 C5 Grading and Utility Plan 6/16/2017 C6 Landscape Plan & Details 6/16/2017 C7 Lighting Plan & Details (Missing from plan set; C7 is actually Site & Utility Details) 6/16/2017 C8 Site & Utility Details (marked as C7; C8 missing) - Exhibit Showing Conceptual Site Layout for Riverside Village, Block 1 (submitted for ZMA2016-19) 8/3/2016 10 Attachment A COUNTY DF ALBEMARLE Dopartrncrit of Commenfty.Devolopment 401 MuinVre Road. North Wing Charlottesvillo,wrginia 22902-48$$ Phone l+l 4) 296-ffa32 Fax i434t 972-4126 Aprll22, 20115 Justin Shimp CX) S h imp Eng-neerin 201 E Main St SUAe V! Chi3rl0tteswi; to Va 22902 RE: AR1 M60 Ft"rside wilrage Block i Deer Mr. Shrimp, The Albernaiie County Architectural Revgew Ekmrd, et its mee'ing cn Apnl 18, 21416. cum plehed a prelirninary+ review of the abominated reauest to constnict three twostnry retailloffice buildings with Migt�d Bite improvements. The Board offered Ihe following oumments for the ben efii of the app1icarrt's next submittal. Plea5e n Dte that the following cornments a re those that have been identified at this time. Additrona I wrnmenie may be added ar eliminated based an further review and changes to the plan. 1. Submit mate.�ial and color samples for review 2. Provide dimensioned elevations for review. 3. Provide oornplete side elevatiions for review. Eliminate blankness in we side elevation] by iroorporafng architectural delaiir+g, 4. Add she standard window glass note to the drawings. Wridow glass in the Entrance CoMdlare should meet the I bIlowing criteria; Visible light transmittance (VLT) shall not d rop below 40%. Vi.5ible light reflectance (VLR) shal nci exceed Z0 . 5. Add the standard mechanical equipment note to both the site and a chdectural drawings. -Visibility CrF all rnmo anical equ ipment from fie Entrance CerrkJlor Shall be eli m irrated.' $. Add 5h rubs along the parking tat where buHldings d v nut block parking spaces from the CC. 7. P mvide side elevations for review, Addi cinar IendS ih*g may be needed by saAani the appwmr'de of exterior Wairs. 8. Ploalde a pranj WhedUle cin the plan For mvIL-w, g. Add the slaroard plant hetr4h rrobe to the drawings. `All &t* plagVNs -or trees and shrubs oh NI 4a allowed po rewA. arrd be maimalned at. ma4ure hei hk the bdIciping of trees is pmhlbitad. Shn;bs and trees she. I be pru na d minimialiyr a-nd only to support the overall health of the pint.' 10. Show rornple a gray zg on we piarw. You may submit y+Our applitali0111 fr3r-rSrtitinuad AFAR review at your eadurAt ronvanianrA. Appllcalion forma, checklists and snbdUk�s argy avallable onalne at wtiwr_albarnart,e.nrLV4RS. Revised drawl rigs addressIN the mmments llsted above are requi ed_ lni: Wde updated ARS revision dales on each drawing. Please provide a memo includiN dKo led responses indicating I^eweach comment has been addressed. If changes ether then those requested have been mad-e, Identify (hose Chang es in the memo also. Highlig hang the changes in the drawing with "cloudir g' or by other rnears will facilitate raview and approval. 11