The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995-08-09 FIN A L 7:00 P.M. August 9, 1995 Room 241, County Office Building 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Call to Order. Pledge of Allegiance. Moment of Silence. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. Consent Agenda (on next sheet) . Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 2.1, Agricul- tural and Forestal Districts, by adding a parcel to Section 2.1.4 (g), Moorman's River Agricultural Forestal Dist. Proposed addition consists of 1 parcel of approx 60 ac on W side of Rt 671 (Ballards Mill Rd) at intersec of Rt 821 (Blufton Mill Rd) N of Millington. SP-95-17. University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation. Public Hearing on a request for a 60 bed hospital on approx 49 ac zoned CO. Located in the Fontaine Research Park on S sd of Fontaine Ave. TM76,P17B&17B1. Samuel Miller Dist. SP-95-18. Benny Thacker. Puslie HeaFiag on a requeot for Oooup.:1tion CI.:100 B on .:1pprOJc 89 ao !<Joned R.".. Loo.:1ted apprOJ( 1000 ft W of Rt 630 & apprOJ( 1. C mi :N of Rt C. Ccotto~illc Diot. (Applicant requests deferral.) CPA-95-03. Use Value Taxation for Open Space. Public Hearing on a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan for Albemarle County, Virginia, Chapter 4, to establish the consistency of various park or recreation uses with the Land Use Plan for purposes of qualifying for use value taxation as open space use. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. Executive Session: Legal Matters. Certify Executive Session. Adjourn. 7) 8 ) a Home on p',rt rd TPil18 , ['32&33. 9) 10) lOa) lOb) ll) CON S E N T AGE N D A FOR APPROVAL: 5.1 ZMA-94-12. River Heights. Commission.) (Defer until after action taken by Planning 5.2 Resolution to accept streets in Mill Creek - Section 7, into the State Secondary System of Highways. 5.2a Proclamation proclaiming August 29, 1995 through September 2, 1995 as Albemarle County Fair Week. 5.2b Resolution endorsing the James Madison Commemorative Coin Act. FOR INFORMATION: 5.3 Copy of Planning Commission minutes for July 18 and July 25, 1995. 5.4 Letter dated August 2, 1995, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, from J. H. Shiff- lett, Jr., Maintenance Operations Manager, Department of Transportation, providing notice that the Route 618 bridge across the Hardware River in Albemarle County will be closed to through traffic beginning Monday, August 7, 1995, through Thursday, August 31, 1995. 5.5 Copy of minutes of the Board of Directors of the Albemarle County Service Authority for June 15, 1995. 5.6 Letter dated August 1, 1995, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, from Shirley J. Ybarra, Deputy Secretary of Transportation, Department of Transportation, re: Meadow Creek Parkway. 5.7 Letter dated August 4, 1995, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, from Gerald G. Utz, Contract Administrator, Department of Transportation, forwarding a copy of a resolution by the Commonwealth Transportation Board allocating Supplemental Revenue Sharing to Albemarle County for FY 1994-95. 5.8 Letter dated August 4, 1995, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, from Gerald G. Utz, Contract Administrator, Department of Transportation, forwarding a copy of a resolution by the Commonwealth Transportation Board allocating Industrial Access Funds for FY 1995-96 to provide access to GE Fanuc Automation. 5.9 Copy of letter dated August 3, 1995, to Robert W. Tucker, County Execu- tive, from L. A. Reaser, Director of Building Services, re: new high school partnerships. 5.10 Notice dated August 1, 1995, from the Honorable Charles R. Hawkins, Senate of Virginia, concerning a Route 29 tourism meeting. I / ~/ David P. Bowennan Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director, Planning & Community Development FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk~ DATE: August 10, 1995 SUBJECT: Board Actions of August 9, 1995 The following is a list of actions taken by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on August 9, 1995: Agenda Item No.1. Call to Order. Called to order at 7:03 p.m. Agenda Item NO.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. There were none. Agenda Item No. 5.1. ZMA-94-12. action taken by Planning Commission.) the Planning Commission. River Heights. (Defer until after Deferred until action has been taken by Agenda Item No. 5.2. Resolution to accept streets in Mill Creek - Section 7, into the State Secondary System of Highways. Adopted resoluti9P. Agenda Item No. 5.2a. Proclamation proclaiming August 29, 1995 through September 2, 1995 as Albemarle County Fair Week. Adopted proclamation. Agenda Item No. 5.2b. Resolution endorsing the James Madison Commemora- tive Coin Act. Adopted resolution. Agenda Item No.6. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, by adding a parcel to Section 2.1.4 (g), Moorman's River Agricultural Forestal Dist. Proposed addition consists of 1 parcel of approx 60 ac on W side of Rt 671 (Ballards Mill Rd) at intersec of Rt 821 (Blufton Mill Rd) N of Millington. Adopted Ordinance as advertised. Agenda Item No.7. SP-95-17. University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation. Public Hearing on a request for a 60 bed hospital on approx 49 ac * Printed on recycled paper ..... ~~ To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. V. Wayne Cilimberg August 10, 1995 2 Date: Page: zoned CO. Located in the Fontaine Research Park on S sd of Fontaine Ave. TM76,P17B&17B1. Samuel Miller Dist. Approved SP-95-17, as recommended by the Planning Commission subject to the following four conditions: 1. Use is limited to 60 beds; 2. Use shall not commence until such time as appropriate state and federal approvals have been obtained; 3. Site plan shall not be signed until fire official approval has been obtained; 4. Use shall be for inpatient medical rehabilitation and shall not provide emergency services. It was the Board's consensus that the Chairman send a letter to City Council regarding the Board's action on this issue and with the understanding that City Council still intends to move forward with the four-Ianing of Fontaine, from UREF's property, into the city. It was the Board's consensus that a work session be scheduled regarding tax-exemption standards, in particular, information about the three party agreement and the creation of the University Real Estate Foundation at the September 6, 1995, meeting. Agenda Item No.8. SP-95-18. Benny Thacker. Public Hearing on a request for a Home Occupation Class B on approx 89 ac zoned RA. Located on pvt rd approx 1000 ft W of Rt 630 & approx 1.6 mi N of Rt 6. TMl18,P32&33. Scottsville Dist. Deferred SP-95-18, to September 13, 1995, per the applicant's request. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Move by Mr. Bowerman, seconded by Mrs. Humphris, at 7:35 p.m., that the Board go into Executive Session pursuant to section 2.1- 344(a) of the Code of Virginia under subsection (7) to consult with legal counsel and staff regarding probable litigation regarding a taxation matter. CERTIFY EXECUTIVE SESSION: Certified. Agenda Item No.9. CPA-95-03. Use Value Taxation for Open Space. Public Hearing on a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan for Albemarle County, Virginia, Chapter 4, to establish the consistency of various park or recreation uses with the Land Use Plan for purposes of qualifying for use value taxation as open space use. Approved an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, Chapter Four, Implementing the Plan, page 225, at the end of the section titled, Use Value Assessment (Land Use Tax) recommended by the Planning Commission as follows: Albemarle County currently has an ordinance, adopted on August 23, 1973, (Code of Albemarle, Sections 8-31 through 8-40) which permits all four classifica- tions of use value taxation: Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, and Open Space. In order for land to qualify for the Open Space category, it must meet both General and Specific Standards found in the Manual of the State Land Evaluation Advisory Council. In addition, to meeting these standards as prescribed by the Code of Virginia, any park and recreation use must also meet all of the following local criteria in order to comply with the General Standards and qualify for use value taxation under the Open Space category. .' To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. V. Wayne Cilimberg August 10, 1995 3 Date: Page: The park or recreation use: 1. Must provide open space which serves the objective, "to provide active/passive recreation," as discussed in the Comprehensive Plan, Chapter Two, under Open Space; and 2. Must help to meet the recreational needs of the County as identi- fied in the Community Facilities Plan, the Open Space Plan, or as otherwise defined in the Comprehensive Plan; and 3. Must be open to the public without any membership requirement. Provided, however, the following use, which is considered as consistent with number two above in providing an identified community need, is expected from the no membership requirement criteria: a. athletic fields. Agenda Item No. 10. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. By Board consensus, it was recommended that the position description for the site review process be scheduled as a discussion at the September 6, 1995, meeting. Mrs. Humphris asked a lady to make a presentation to the Board at the September 6, 1995, meeting, under Transportation Matters, regarding the work that is being done by VDOT along the river and the road reconstruction work at Sugar Hollow. Mrs. Humphris said she has been receiving a lot of mail regarding the Ivy Landfill. She is in the process of responding to letters. Mrs. Thomas requested that Mr. Tucker investigate whether the County has a legislative packet from previous years that can be presented by the Chairman to the Commission on State and Local Government Responsibility and Taxing Authority for its public hearing in Charlottesville as part of the Local Government Official's Conference next week. Mrs. Thomas and Mrs. Humphris will also attend this conference. Mr. Bowerman said that he received a phone call from a citizen regarding the proliferation of utility boxes, located on top of the ground, along Old Brook Road. He asked staff to investigate whether there could be any coordi- nation between the utility companies in placing these boxes. Agenda Item No. lOa. Executive Session: Legal Matters. Motion by Mr. Bowerman, seconded by Mrs. Humphris that the Board go into Executive Session at 8:41 p.m., pursuant to section 2.1-344(a) of the Code of Virginia under subsection (7) to consult with legal counsel and staff regarding specific legal matters concerning reversion. ~ reconstruction work at Sugar Hollow. Mrs. Humphris said she has been receiving a lot of mail regarding the Ivy Landfill. She is in the process of responding to letters. Mrs. Thomas said the Local Government Official's Conference (LGOC) is scheduled for this weekend and will continue through Tuesday morning. On Tuesday morning, the Commission on State and Local Government Responsibility and Taxing Authority will have one of its statewide public hearings in Char- lottesville. This is the County's opportunity to respond directly to commis- sion members. She asked Mr. Tucker if the County had anything, from previous years, in the legislative packet that can be emphasized to the commission. She requested that the Chairman present this packet to the commission. Mr. Tucker will investigate. Mrs. Humphris said the LGOC will have a work session on the BPOL tax which is scheduled for Monday afternoon. The meeting that Sally is talking about will also take up alternative methods of taxation. Mr. Tucker said the Board did not define or give alternatives to BPOL last year. The Board opposed losing the revenue which is in last year's legislative packet. Mrs. Humphris said she attended the Farm Bureau Dinner last night. She said members presented a packet of resolutions that dealt with federal, state and local government. She asked if the Farm Bureau has ever sent resolutions to the Board because she does not remember receiving any. There seems to be confusion about these resolutions and which branch of government has the power to do what. She requested that Mr. Tucker obtain from the Farm Bureau the resolutions that were passed that involve local government and to respond to them appropriately. Mr. Perkins said a list can be obtained from the Farm Bureau's office. Mr. Bowerman said he received a telephone call from the President of the League of Women Voters regarding the proliferation of utility boxes, located on top of the ground about every fifty feet, along Old Brook Road. There seems to be a lack of coordination between the utility companies. Mrs. Thomas asked if this could be a part of the Master Utilities Plan that will be worked on soon. Mr. Cilimberg said this is more of a site plan review issue. Mr. Bowerman said he does not believe this is addressed anywhere. Mr. Cilimberg agreed with Mr. Bowerman. Mr. Bowerman asked staff to investigate whether there could be any coordination between the utility companies in placing these boxes without costing the utilities a lot of money. Mrs. Thomas said there has to be a way to get people together such as the utilities and landowners. Mr. Cilimberg said all of the utilities are on the site review committee. This can be the place where this discussion can be initiated. Agenda Item No. lOa. Executive Session: Legal Matters. Motion by Mr. Bowerman, seconded by Mrs. Humphris that the Board go into Executive Session at 8:41 p.m., pursuant to section 2.1-344(a) of the Code of Virginia under subsection (7) to consult with legal counsel and staff regarding specific legal matters concerning reversion. Agenda Item No. lOb. Certify Executive Session. Motion by Mr. Bowerman, seconded by Mrs. Humphris to certify the Executive Session at 9:37 p.m., by recorded vote that to the best of each board member's knowledge, only public .. .,., To: Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr. V. Wayne Cilimberg August 10, 1995 4 Date: Page: Agenda Item No. lOb. Certify Executive Session. Certified Motion was made by Mr. Bowerman, seconded by Mrs. Humphris to adjourn the Executive Session until Monday, August 14, 1995, at 5:00 p.m., to the fourth floor conference room regarding legal matters. All ayes. Agenda Item No. 11. Adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. EWC/tpf Attachments (4) cc: Richard E. Huff Roxanne White Jo Higgins Amelia McCulley Bruze Woodzell Larry Davis File The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virgin- ia, in regular meeting on the 9th day of August, 1995, adopted the following resolution: RES 0 L UTI 0 N WHEREAS, the streets in Mill Creek - section 7 described on the attached Additions Form S~-5(A) dated Auqust 9, 1995, fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, virginia; and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transpor- tation to add the roads in Mill Creek - section 7 as described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated Auqust 9, 1995, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision street Require- ments; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the recorded plats; and FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. * * * * * Recorded vote: Moved by: Mr. Marshall. Seconded by: Mr. Bowerman. Yeas: Mrs. Humphris, Messrs. Marshall, Martin, Perkins, Mrs. Thomas and Mr. Bowerman. Nays: None. A Copy Teste: .. .µ ~ ;j .... 0 U tI1 :>I II> ~ '" .... 0 '" t!} H ~ .... '( 'i CD .J.J E-4 '" Q ..c Q .J.J o-i E-4 I:: .¡ CD tI1 .m lIS .J.J a rz. I:: u Q CD '" ..Q ~ .J.J o-i .J.J )': k .0: ..c 'i .J.J E-4 11 tI1 I:: :>I H tI1 >- .J.J :>I CD k ~ ::I <I] fà 0 0 u 'i I:: tI1 0 .... 'i .J.J ::I ~ .... E-4 0 11 IV E-4 II: 11 tI1 k I"- :<: 0 11 0 oM ¡:: H ~ 0 E-4 CD .r-! H 110 .µ Q ::I U ~ <I] Q .... Q 0 'i '( tI1 k ft 0 0 ø. III 0 II ø: ø. o-i >. o-i .r-! .... )': ..c I:: 0 III CD ~ I Q 0 ø: 0 .,..¡ tI1 ~ III u .r-! ~ CD > .<: u .r-! 0 - 'Ø rz. 0 -§ .J.J tI1 .J.J I:: I. H CD 0 E-4 .m H u Q Q '" 9 .J.J ~ .J.J .0: :<: I- õõ - :> is Z - In .:::::. - a « ~ - 0 Ct: $þÞ" ;¡: ~ ~ en is Ê ~ o In ... .<: .J.J m 11 ~ I:: CD CD 0 ...:I .... .... M I:: ~ . 0 CD 0 .... .J.J I:: oM oM '( o-i '( k .0: CD .J.J I:: CD U 11 Q CD ... t¡) .J.J .. lIS 0 "- Q Z ~ .... 11 ;;;- .r-! ::I ... )': 0 . CD ., o-i I:: . '" '" lIS .... .. .µ .... on 0 0 II) .. E-4 u on 11 " oM .. ~ '" ::: .. .. '" 0 ~ on :I: .J.J .... I - 0.<: I .J.J II:'( oM :I: .. .. ~ u ... · .. oM ':' ... I:: · ;; · ;; · ;; oM "? bI bI bI bI bI ~ ... · · · · · ., ð .. .. .. .. .. CD OH E-t ... OH '" .. 0 :::: I:: ... ... ... .. 0 a .. ,;¡ .. g .. oM ..; .J.J 8 0 0 0 ... .;- 0 0 0 oM + .. .. .. .. .. 'Ø 0 .. ... ... ... '( ... + 1 ~ ... · · · .0: · ... · · · · · ., '" '" " " " .J.J VI · ., II) 'CÌ VI ... II) .. ... · 'CÌ "- 0 .. .J.J .. · "- fJ1 oS ... ! · ;; ;¡ ;¡ ;; ~ ., ., .. .. ., ... · · · · · .. ... " " " " " ... ... ... 1 ... ! .. 1 · · ~ u ... '!: '!: ... ... .. .. .. ... ::! 0 0 0 0 0 ... u u u u u ... · · · · · ... .. .. .. .. .. ä .. Ö ., Ö .. ä ., 0 .. · ö · · ö · · .. 0 ... .. ... .. ~ ... .. ... .. ~ ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .J.J II) CD ... .J.J ... fJ1 · .... oS 0 · II) ! ~ .. z U ::! ... ... .... 0 ... II) z ... ... ... on II: CD m '" I:: oM '" ... '( '( I:: '" oÌ .... .... oM .... oÌ .J.J ~ ::I u ... 0 "'" .... 11 .J.J I:: CD EI CD CD 11 > '" 0 CD .Q ~ '" '( '" CD 11 .J.J 11 '" CD ~ U U oM CD '( I:: æ I:: ~ .... U .J.J '" ~ I:: CD .... ~ 0 ~ u II) 0 > rz. '( oM 11 0 CD ::I .<: o-i :<: .J.J u Ie 0 .... II) H 0 >- E-4 .J.J '" £j ... ~ :. '" I H 110 .... rz. 0 '" I H .J.J E-4 11 .<: ø: '" m 'i oM '( ... u CD oM .... .... 0 oM .J.J .<: ... .J.J CD '( U oM :. III '( oM II) .J.J II) I:: .J.J IV I:: .m '" ... u '" '" ::I .J.J t!I .J.J '" II III oM II) .<: .J.J E-t 0 Z PROCLAMATION ALBEMARLE .cOUNTY FAIR WEEK / WHEREAS, for the past 14 years, the Albemarle County Fair has entertained tens of thousands of guests during its annual production; and WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Fair is unique in many ways, founded by a group of community spirited people who wanted something spedal for their neighbors and friends to enjoy and enrich their lives. Tbe theme has always emphasized the County's agricultural and forestal heritage; and WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Fair is a non-profit corporation operated by dedicated volunteer, officers and directors; and WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Fair offers an atmosphere condudve to families and their children. A friendly, safe, carefree atmosphere is the hallmark of the event. Unique in the state in that all food and drink is sold by local non-profit organizations as an opportunity for them to raise monies for their worthwhile programs; and WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Fair supports agricultural and rural lifestyles, offers exhibits of home-art skills, crops, large livestock, small livestock and poultry, with competitions in livestock and numerous other farm skills, and nightly entertainrtzent for all to enjoy; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Walter F. Perkins, Chairman, on behalf of the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors, do hereby proclaim the week of AUGUST 29, 1995 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2, 1995 as ALBEMARLE COUNTY FAIR WEEK and urge all citizens to actively participate in the scheduled activities and programs sponsored and supported by the more than 250 volunteers, public and area businesses. W aJjJ;;, ::;- a;LM~'7~ CHAIRMAN ALBEMARLE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS · . RES 0 L UTI 0 N WHEREAS, Congressman Thomas J. Bliley, Jr., Albemarle County's representa- tive in the U. S. House of Representatives on May 23, 1995, introduced the James Madison Commemorative Coin Act to honor President James Madison; and WHEREAS, the one dollar commemorative coin authorized by this Act duly recognizes the 250th anniversary of James Madison's birth, the year 2001, and his life long home at Orange County, Virginia, the historic Montpelier; and WHEREAS, President James Madison served his native Virginia and the United States of America as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, a member of the Virginia House of Delegates, a member of the U. S. House, as Secretary of State, and as Fourth President of the United States; and WHEREAS, from among all of our nation's founding fathers (led by the Sons of Virginia, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, George Mason, George Wythe, James Madison and Patrick Henry), President James Madison's record of meritorious service and unequaled contributions to the American democratic system has not been properly extolled and understood in recent times; and WHEREAS, the Commemorative Coin Act also will provide a permanent source of support to protect and preserve James Madison's original residence, Montpelier, now owned by the National Trust for Historic Preservation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, hereby endorses the adoption of the James Madison Commemorative Coin Act as a proper, long overdue tribute to President James Madison and Montpelier and does hereby commend Congressman Thomas J. Bliley, Jr., for his initiative in submitting this legislation to the United States Congress; and BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER that as recommended by the June 11, 1995, editorial of the Richmond Times-Dispatch, this Board also believes issuance of a one dollar James Madison coin as a permanent part of the U. S. currency would be a universally use.d reminder of and welcome tribute to one of our nation's greatest founding fathers. * * * * * I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on August 9, 1995. C ORDINANCE NO. 95-2.1(6) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 2.1, AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS SECTION 2.1.4, DISTRICTS DESCRIBED OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the BOjrd of County supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, is hereby amended and reordained by amending section 2.1.4(g), Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal District, as follows: Sec. 2.1-4. Districts described. (g) The district known as the "Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal District" consists of the following de- scribed properties: Tax map 27, parcels 32, 34, 40, 40A, 42; tax map 28, parcels 2, 2A, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6A, 7, 7A, 7A1, 7B, 8, 11, 12A, 17A, 17C, 18, 23B, 32B, 32C, 32D, 34, 34A, 34B, 35, 35B, 37, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D, 38; tax map 29, parcels 2C, 7B, 8, 8B, 8E, 8H, 8J, 8K, 9, 10, 15C, 40B, 40C, 40D, 49C, 50, 54A, 61, 62, 63, 63A, 63D, 67, 67C, 69D, 69F, 70A, 70B, 70C, 70F, 70G, 70H, 70H1, 70K, 70L, 70M, 71, 71A, 73B, 74A, 76, 77, 78, 79, 79A1, 79A2, 79B, 79C, 79D, 79D1, 80, 84; tax map 30, parcels 10, lOA, 12, 17A, 18E; tax map 41, parcels 15, 17 C , 18, 37 D 1, 41, 41 C , 41H, 44, 50, 67, 67 B , 68, 70, 72, 72B, 72C, 89; tax map 42, parcels 5, 6, 6B, 8, 8A, 8C., 10, lOA, 10D, 25C, 25C1, 37F, 37J, 38, 40, 40C, 40D, 40D1, 40G, 40H, 40H2, 41, 42B, 43, 43A, 44, 53 (part), 58; tax map 43, parcels 1, 1B, 2, 2A, 3, 3A, 3C, 3D, 4C, 4D, 5, 5A, 9, 10, 16B, 17, 18, 18A, 18C, 18E4, 18F, 18G, 18J, 19I, 19N, 19P, 20A, 20B, 20C, 2l, 21A, 23A, 23D, 24, 25A, 25B, 25E, 30, 30A, 30B, 30D, 30G, 30H, 30M, 32H, 33, 33D, 34, 41, 42, 43, 45, 45A, 45C, 45D, 58; tax map 44, parcels 1, 2, 24, 25, 26, 26A, 26C, 27B, 27C, 28, 29, 29A, 29D, 30, 30A, 30B, 31, 31A, 31A1, 31D, 31F, 31G, 32G, 32G1; tax map 59, par- cels 30, 30C, 32, 32A, 34, 35, 82A. * * * * * I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on August 9, 1995. ç, llø- W {- cU¡(, Board of cou~rVisors COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296·5823 5 /995 ,~"".",. ~..,... '"'"',-- August 15, 1995 Mr. Wendell Wood River Heights Associates Post Office Box 5548 Charlottesville, VA 22905 RE: ZMA-94-12 - River Heights Dear Mr. Wood: The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on August 9. 1995. deferred the above referenced petition until action has been taken by the Planning Commission. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, U.L \ A .l~b~ V. Wayn C1 1m ~ Director of p~nning & Community Development VWC/blb '. c"~ Ella Carey Amelia McCulley Jo Higgins I:\GENERAL\SHARE\BARBARA\ZMA-9412.ACT .., COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Pept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5823 March 22, 1995 MAR27Ø6 ,t,-..~..."",..."",,,._--~~ 0;:: SUPER"" -c-",...__,~,...~".."" Wendell Wood River Heights Associates P. O. Box 5548 Charlottesville, VA 22905 RE: ZMA-94-12 River Heights Dear Mr. Wood: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March 21, 1995, accepted your request for indefinite deferral of the above-noted petition. If you should have any questions or concerns about the above-noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, V~/~ William D. Fritz Senior Planner WDF/jcw ~ Ella Carey 10 Higgins Amelia. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5823 M4~~ i ~ March 20, 1995 ~~......."",.'.,~"""""~~.-....... .' ¡:"iD 0,.. ~"'''''-'~.-J , ~ SUp· --.. ~~-IV¡(~ ~-.,..... Wendell Wood River Heights Associates P. O. Box 5548 Charlottesville, VA :f2905 RE: ZMA-94-12 River Heights Dear Mr. Wood: The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on March 15, 1995, deferred the above-noted request to its August 9, 1995 meeting. If you should have any questions or concerns about the above-noted actions, please do not hesitate to contact me. I I Sincerely, . , ~a~eL Director of Planning & C Development VWC/jcw I cc: Ella Carey Jo Higgins Amelia McCuHey ,. iYsd ;L;¡~:.jJ.?~_t:..~_5- l\g{;iìd~ item ;;;J~22~:ß?O~ (5',2-) The Board of county Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virgin- ia, in regular meeting on the 9th day of August, 1995, adopted the following resolution: RES 0 L UTI 0 N WHEREAS, the streets in Mill Creek - Section 7 described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated Auqust 9, 1995, fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transpor- tation to add the roads in Mill Creek - Section 7 as described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated Auqust 9, 1995, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Require- ments; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the recorded plats; and FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. * * * * * Recorded vote: Moved by: Seconded by: Yeas: Nays: A Copy Teste: Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE MEMORANDUM TO: Ella Carey, Clerk, Board of Supervisors \ FROM: Mark B. Henry, Civil Engineer /I \ \rJ \ DATE: August 1, 1995 RE: Mill Creek Subdivision - Section 7 (SUB-90-024) The road serving the referenced subdivision is substantially complete and ready for a VDOT acceptance inspection. Attached is the completed SR-5(A) form for a resolution, which I request be taken to the Board for adoption at your next opportunity. Once the resolutions have been adopted, please date and sign the SR-5(A), and provide me with the original and four copies. Thanks you for your assistance, please contact me should you have any questions. MBH/ctj Attachment File: marklbrialWoo.res ... I ¡995 ...............",...."""'...:-..-.:0;:.,= .. / AdO:> David P. Bowennan Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 / FAX (804) 972-4060 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsvil1e Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller MEMO TO: Mark B. Henry, Civil Engineer FROM: Ella Carey, Clerk, Board of Supervisors êlJ ¿., DATE: August 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Resolution - Mill Creek Subdivision - Section 7 Attached is the original resolution (plus four copies) adopted by the Board of County Supervisors on August 9, 1995, requesting the acceptance of Mill Creek Subdivision - Section 7 in the Cardinal Ridge Subdivision into the State Secondary System of Highways. EWC/tpf Attachments (4) * Printed on recycled paper The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virgin- ia, in regular meeting on the 9th day of August, 1995, adopted the following resolution: RES 0 L UTI 0 N WHEREAS, the streets in Mill Creek - section 7 described on the attached Addi~ions Form S~-5(A) dated Auqust 9, 1995, f~ll¥ incorporated hereln by reference, are shown on plats recorded ln the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transpor- tation to add the roads in Mill Creek - Section 7 as described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated Auqust 9, 1995, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street-Require- ments; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the recorded plats; and FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. * * * * * Recorded vote: Moved by: Mr. Marshall. Seconded by: Mr. Bowerman. Yeas: Mrs. Humphris, Messrs. Marshall, Martin, Perkins, Mrs. Thomas and Mr. Bowerman. Nays: None. A Copy Teste: tI1 :>I ~ t!} H ~ 'i E-4 ..c E-4 tI1 rz. o ): 'i E-4 :>I tI1 I ILl ~ .... 0 U II> .... 0 'Ö .... , GJ .J.J .J.J OJ '" Q I::o-i CD .¡ .J.J ~ ~ I:: CD ~.Q ~ .J.Jo-i .J.J o<..c III I:: H >. .J.J CD . =' tn 0 ~ !ê o u 'i I:: 0 or! .J.J =' ri 0 III CD ø: III . 0 ro- III ..... B ~ GJ ·M go ~ tn Q .... tI1 0 'Ö I . ~ '" 0 Q III Q a .¡ . z o H E-4 H Q ~ Q 'i tI1 o p., o P: p., ..c ~ ri I:: o GJ I:: o ,I( U GJ .<: u I P: tI1 ~ o rz. tI1 Z o H E-4 H Q ~ o .J.J .J.J I:: j u '" .J.J .J.J 0< I- ~ - ::> '-... _ is ~ - ~ ¥,.; '" z ~ § '"- In - I I .<: .J.J m I:: III .., CD CD <> ...:I.... 'M I:: X 0 ..... CD .J.J I:: M .......... 'Öri 'Ö . 0 0< CD .J.J I:: CD U o-i '"1 ): .. s:: o -rI III -M > -M 't; '§ tI1 ~ o Q ~ Z .J.J GJ GJ . .J.J tn .... o GJ ~ Z .... 0 ~z I III CD .J.J o Z III =' o GJ I:: '" .... .... GJ U III ..... X - :I:~ I ~ 0.<: I.J.J ø:'Ö or! :I: ..... I:: ..... e ., GJ .. E-I .. I:: 0- .. 0 .. ..... ... .J.J ..... .. + '1:1 <> ~ .. · ., .J.J .. GJ ..ì GJ . · .J.J ~ tn · .go .. PC U ... ... .. os ä k .. :;: .... ~ .... .. ... . ., . <> r- Ift , .. 1ft " '" '" .., .., .. .. <> ... · ~ · ~ PC ~ ... ... ... os ... <> 1ft u · '? · '? ã '" .. ~ ... ... ... ; ;¡ to · to ... · '" '" .. ... ... ... ,;¿ 0 0 8 .. ... .. · ... · · <> · <> .. o ... a .; .. + .. ... · ., .. ... '" .... r- .... .. · ;; ., · ., <> · ... <> · ... 'E · ... 0 k U 0 · U PC :: ., 8 ., · 8 .... k ~ · '" .. .... k '" .. ..ì ~ · to ... .. PC U ... ... .. os o .. ... I r · ii to ; : .. · .. .. : ,;¿ ,;¿ 8 0 ,;¿ .. 0 0 .. 0 '¥ ... .. & · ... · · <> & ii · .. ;¡ · .. <> · ., <> · ... ... <> : · ... k ... : 0 .. u 0 k · U 0 PC · u ä PC · ., PC 0 · ., 8 ., .... k Ö · .. '" .., to .... k ~ ~ .. .. '" .., .. 1ft Q m Cd Q o-i -ri ): o-i Cd .µ o E-4 CD :- 0 ,Q '" 'Ö GJ .J.J ~ '" u ..... æ 'Ö I:: ..... U .J.J ~ I:: CD ~ ~ u 0 rz. 'Ö 0 GJ .<: Z .J.J 0 .... H 0 ~ .J.J . '" ~ H J:lo rz. H '" E-4 III P: '" 'i 'Ö U CD ..... .... ..... .J.J . GJ U CD m '" I:: ..... '" . 'Ö 'Ö I:: '" III .... .... ..... ..... III .J.J =' U . o .... III .J.J I:: GJ Ii CD III '" GJ ~ '" III III GJ U GJ I:: ~ '" .... o GJ :- ..... III ;:I .... u Ie CD ~ :a I .... o I .J.J ,Q m ..... . .... o ,Q .J.J 'Ö ..... :a 'Ö GJ GJ .J.J I:: '" . '" =' t!) .. III GJ .J.J o Z ~ " III ... .J.J I:: ~ CD 11 u '" .J.J .J.J '" 01 'M ,Q E-I The roads described on Additions Form SR-5(A) are: 1) Hidden Ridge Road from station 10+11, 1474 feet to station 24+85, the end of the cUl-de-sac, with a 50 foot right-of-way, as shown on plat recorded 4/7/92 in the Office the Clerk of the Circuit Court in Deed Book 1216, pages 212-219. Additional right-of-way shown on plat recorded 8/24/93 in Deed Book 1336, pages 51-57. Total mileage - 0.3 mile. '" COpy David P. Bowennan Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 / FAX (804) 972-4060 Charles S. Martin R ¡vanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouell Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller August 10, 1995 Ms. Barbara Shifflett 4073 Gillmers Mill Lane Scottsville, VA 24590 Dear Ms. Shifflett: At its meeting on August 10, 1995, the Board of County Supervisors adopted the attached Proclamation recognizing August 29, 1995 through September 2, 1995, as Albemarle County Fair Week. If there are any questions, please call me for assistance. Sincerely, ( Ijß'-~ liJ (~r' E~ W. Carey, Clerk Board of County Supervi ors EWC/tpf * Printed on recycled paper 08/07/95 09:19 'US04 977 8247 MORVEN I4J 001 . . PROCLAMArION .,,0, __. ~,,' . " ",. . ~ ' . - . .. .,,,".. ~ ' ... ,- "', , ~.'~ ,":, ""~ ... ". . .AL1J1!.MARL1! C0UN1Y· PAIR W&;i( 0" _.' . " WHElŒA.(./m-~~it~~ d,e~ Ccnøøy F~¡;~'~'~:~.~~~ '¡¡'~~:.~:' åtrir.Jf, its il1Ì1rMiIl ~ aM" . . . '... VIHEB.J!.A5~' the ~ Cmmty Fairis IItZÛF in ~ œays.~JPUie4 by it xrrntÞ of ~spúit,ed . peop1øflllio~ smnetbing spøt:Îill for tb_ neigb1Jtm 47J frim4t to . lmd emidJrbij.. . ·liva. neiheme Ns IIlrMys emp1Juf:zed tbe c:o.ty~s agriC1l1:twal tmd fuZuz !Jerit4iëfa4 W.tlÈHP.A.~ tbrAlbømtWk ÇoNnJyFtliris IIntnt J1rtI/it~4 Oþel'~lry ~"l1fJbmuer, ojJiœis aM 4i1~ tmtl '. . " . , . w~ the Albernølt Onmty Fair offers rm tZttJIfJsphtre ~œ to [amilie$ ilnd tbeJr chz7drøi. A. frie1ul/1» ....cøefree ilÞ1u1Spbere is the .h~ of the I!'t7ent. UniIp¡e in. ~ út dJrz: f!l/l food øul ci1d Is sold jy lDazl1J(JØ-profit ~ tIS an ~ for them ID .nÞse.' mo.ies ,.,. rÞCÍI-.--tl>.Jnk pmgmlllS; tmtl . . . . .. . . "'::'", ":':' :'."-::~.'" . ' . . . '. . WHl!R.FAt -.~~ PWø1J1onugnaltwilld1ltl rm-id~ks, ;¡¡a1s.c;:i¡¡'¡iiøf~_~:,: ....~ ,"~. . Siili, ~ £zrge liwstIx:i. smaIHi'C1l!SlDl:i ttU ~. Widicbmp~._·fiiDømckø;a¿;::::;,_,;·;. ~ ~ fama sld1Is» ttn411igb1ly ~p.tdlto .joy;- ..' .'- '.\:-. ."'" .- ..... :' ... ' .-.' .' "'.' NO~ '}:'H1flœpORB;......"~ w"" r. PerIdns. Çb~ on Waif tftie ~~ ofC~i_~i,\~,.:::, . .C!'...... ,. b J~. -..-1__...._ __I."" '. . -., . ..' '.. . .. .... -'_ .".".. . ---rQVøQn. IW rJ:r~J ¥""'_"IOC ~."1 . . '. .... ..~.. .. .... '.'.' . AUGUg 28~ 1!J94 THROUGH ~,MlJER 3. 1994 tIS ALBEMJ11U.l! COUNl'Y F4JR WEEK and ttrgtt all ~~S to /tctroJ.y partû:ip4œ in the Jebcáliled 4t:tÏ.rmxs a1I4l prøgrams spóIl$tIred and SIIJ11ØTl:ed. by the more thtm 2S0 ÐÐ~. pøbli~ _ tØéIl hmzases. . iAìæÆ -9 ~, _ - CIlAIRJIAN ALBFMA.R.1.,EBOARD OF COUNTY :¡UPE./:{VISORS . '. ..---.. ._"-_.. .......,,-~~.-4..::..... f COPY David P. Bowennan Ctrarlotlesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296·5843 ;" FAX (804) 972-4060 Charles S. Martin Rivannd Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouetl Walter F. Perkms White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller August 10, 1995 The Honorable Thomas J. Bliley u.s. House of Representatives, 7th District 2241 Rayburn, HOB Washington, DC 20515 Dear Congressman Bliley: At its meeting on August 9, 1995, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors adopted the attached Resolution supporting the James Madison Commemorative Coin Act to honor President James Madison. If there are any questions, please call me for assistance. SiçCï1: (JJ~ ~a W. Carey, Cler Board of Superviso EWC/tpf cc: Ms. Brenda Garton Bailey, Clerk * Printed on recycled paper RES 0 L UTI 0 N WHEREAS, Congressman Thomas J. Bliley, Jr., Albemarle County's representa- tive in the U. S. House of Representatives on May 23, 1995, introduced the James Madison Commemorative Coin Act to honor President James Madison; and WHEREAS, the one dollar commemorative coin authorized by this Act duly recognizes the 250th anniversary of James Madison's birth, the year 2001, and his life long home at Orange County, Virginia, the historic Montpelier; and WHEREAS, President James Madison served his native Virginia and the United States of'America as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, a member of the Virginia House of Delegates, a member of the U. S. House, as Secretary of State, and as Fourth President of the United States; and WHEREAS, from among all of our nation's founding fathers (led by the Sons of Virginia, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, George Mason, George Wythe, James Madison and Patrick Henry), President James Madison's record of meritorious service and unequaled contributions to the American democratic system has not been properly extolled and understood in recent times; and WHEREAS, the Commemorative Coin Act also will provide a permanent source of support to protect and preserve James Madison's original residence, Montpelier, now owned by the National Trust for Historic Preservation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, hereby endorses the adoption of t~e James Madison Commemorative Coin Act as a proper, long overdue tribute to President James Madison and Montpelier and does hereby commend Congressman Thomas J. Bliley, Jr., for his initiative in submitting this legislation to the United States Congress; and BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER that as recommended by the June 11, 1995, editorial of the Richmond Times-Dispatch, this Board also believes issuance of a one dollar James Madison coin as a permanent part of the U. S. currency would be a universally us~d reminder of and welcome tribute to one of our nation's greatest founding fathers. * * * * * I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held Qn August 9, 1995. C Resolution 95.23 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESOLUTION At a regular meeting of the Orange County Board of Supervisors held on July 11, 1995, the following resolution was unanimously adopted. WHEREAS, Congressman Thomas J, Bliley, Jr., Orange County's representative in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 23, 1995, introduced the James Madison Commemorative Coin Act to honor President James Madison; and WHEREAS, the one dollar commemorative coin authorized by this Act duly recognizes the 250th anniversary of James Madison's birth, the year 2001, and his life long home at Orange County, Virginia, the historic Montpelier; and WHEREAS, President James Madison served his native Virginia and the United States of America as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, a member of the Virginia House of Delegates, a member of the U.S. House, as Secretary of State, and as Fourth President of the United States; and WHEREAS, from among all of our nation's founding fathers (led by the Sons of Virginia, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, George Mason, George Wythe, James Madison, and Patrick Henry), President James Madison's record of meritorious service and unequaled contributions to the American democratic system has not been properly extolled and understood in recent times; and WHEREAS, the Commemorative Coin Act also will provide a permanent source of support to protect and preserve James Madison's original residence, Montpelier, now owned by the National Trust for Historic Preservation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: the Orange County Board of Supervisors herebx endorses the adoption of the James Madison Commemorative Coin Act as a proper, long overdue tribute to President James Madison and Montpelier and does hereby commend Congressman Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. for his initiative in submitting this legislation to the United States Congress; and '." BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: as recommended by the June 11, 1995, editorial of the Richmond Times-Dispatch, this Board also believes issuance of a one dollar James Madison coin as a permanent part of the U.S. currency would be a universally used reminder of and welcome tribute to one of our nation's greatest founding fathers. renda Garton ailey, Clerk Orange County Board of Supervisors S" ",.~\- ", I~"~ '., (~ " ,"',- ../ - (,- .- lÌfl1flt¡U"_.,, u; roJMÛ:.~ 7~ -- Ager:ct, lten: ~:o. -2S:_Ô({ì5{.5,:~) COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902-2013 - 3 í-':-Ja. TUCKER RESIDENT ENGINEER August 2, 1995 Route 618, Albemarle County Bridge over Hardware River Ms. Ella Carey Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA. 22902 Dear Ms. Carey: The Route 618 bridge across the Hardware River in Albemarle County will be closed to through traffic beginning on Monday, August 7, 1995. It will remain closed through Thursday, August 31, 1995. The bridge deck will be replaced during the closure. It is located northeast of Scottsville, off of Route 795. For motorists not familiar with the area, suggested detours during the construction are Route 795 out of Scottsville to Route 622, and Route 622 back to Route 618. Should you have any questions, please call this office. Si~~e~y, tfZ-:: Q. J. H. Sh~ Jr. Maint. Oper. Mgr. JHS/ldw Attachments cc: Mr. D. R. Askew Mr. Bob Tucker, Bd. of Super. Scottsville Fire Department, Sch. Trans. Dept. Ch'ville. Post Office, Alb. Co. Schools County Police, State Police S. C. Dean, Keene HQ Emergency 911 Scottsville Rescue Squad TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY \l, ~; 1-')) "~"~~~-~,.. j /-k" . ,~ ':1 (.r: ç, '"'/:! :~_,~~~~~___.~,,,z /~/::,:.:.~) ~~1:; 4 George Allen Governor COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Office of the Governor Robert E. Martinez Secretary of Transportation August 1, 1995 Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Dear Ms. Carey: Secretary Martínez has asked me to thank you for your letter of July 13 forwarding a copy of the resolution adopted by the Board of Supervisors on July 12. The Commonwealth Transportation Board is aware of the desire to have the Meadow Creek Parkway placed in the Primary system. While this would make the corridor eligible for financing utilizing Primary funds, it would not guarantee that the funds necessary for this project will be available in the foreseeable future. The addition of a project of this magnitude would affect the entire Culpeper District Primary Construction Program, and this facility would have to compete with other improvements within the district for funding. While the right-of-way estimate for the Charlottesville Bypass has decreased as a result of modifications to the approved location corridor, we have yet to allocate funds in the Six Year Improvement Program for construction of this facility, thus funds are not available for transfer to the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sin¡:relY, ¥>ffy~JJ!I~u- /' Deputy SeGTetary of Transportation " SJY:wfg cc: Mr. William S. Roudabush Mr. H. Carter Myers, III Mr. David R. Gehr P.O. Box 1475 · Richmond, Virginia 23212 · (804) 786-8032 . TDD (804) 786-7765 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION POBOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902-2013 7 A. G. TUCKER RESIDENT ENGINEER August 4, 1995 Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Va. 22902 Dear Ms. Carey: Attached is a copy of a resolution by the Commonwealth Transportation Board allocating Supplemental Revenue Sharing to Albemarle County in the amount of $40,200 for fiscal year 1994-95. Please distribute this information to the Board of Supervisors. Yours Truly, bit ¿t#- Gerald G. Utz Contract Administrator ggu\ cc: Ms. Jo Higgins w/attachment Mr. D. R Askew Mr. David Benish TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY <r Moved by Mrs. Brooks and seconded by Dr. Thanas , that WHEREAS, Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code of Virginia prescribes the annual allocation of state funds to provide an equivalent matching allocation for certain local funds designated by the governing body to be placed in a special fund account known as "County Primary and Secondary Road Fund"; and WHEREAS, this special fund account .... .shall be used solely for the purposes of either (I) maintaining, improving, or constructing the primary and secondary system within such county, or (ii) bringing subdivision streets, used as such prior to July 1, 1983, up to standards sufficient to qualify them for inclusion in the state primary and secondary system... "; and WHEREAS, Section 33.1-75.1 (D) of the Code of Virginia prescribes the allocation of any unassigned funds in this special fund account; and WHEREAS, over $562,800 of state funds for Fiscal Year 1994-95 is expected to be unobligated as of June 30, 1995; and WHEREAS, the governing bodies of fourteen of the counties eligible to participate in this supplemental allocation for Fiscal Year 1994-95 have, with the Department, identified specific eligible items of work to be financed from the special fund account as indicated in .. Attachment A"; and WHEREAS, it appears that these items of work fall within the intent of Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code of Virginia, and comply with the guidelines of the Department for use of such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Commonwealth Transportation Board hereby approves the allocation of these funds as set forth in .. Attachment A." MOTION CARRIED June 22, 1995 # . z ~ > en(') ì 2? m e. I ¡J ::I. s- f {Ifil I Er <" ~ ñ m "1 .'\1 II~f~ f I~ n ~ ~ ,.[[~ ~ § ~ ~ == = ~. n o ~~~~~~~ 8888§~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~8 ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~!!!! ~ ~~~~~ ~ !~!!~~~ ~~~~~~~ ææsææs~~æsæææ~~ææ~~~~isæææææ~s ~~;~~;~~~~e~~è~~§b~~i~t~~g~~~~~;¡~ "<j"¥' <j"<j"WI §. I T--.I~' I SI~N!?~" f-,,__ ~8~~~~~~8::~~~~~~~~~c;' ~I ~~~~~~~~ i VI JO W W .~ ~ 35 - Y' N --.I VI ~oo P" W ~\O ~ P ~ ~oo ~ ~ \0 00 --.I - _ _ " š š š š š š š š VI š VI Š IVI Š Š ~~~~~~~~55~~~~~~~5555t!~~~~~555~~ ~....................-.......... ...................................... '-"....0\......,., ~" ....................................... .................................... o\.þ... 0\0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ñ~~~w~~~> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8õ~0~~~~~d ~ ~I~ì[t~~t[[[i¡ïi[ilãiiillnr~~~~~~ ~ n ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s § § § _ _ § ~ lee ~ = a a œ = ~ r:; I'\" ~ ~ I'\" ij ~ a: QQ s s [ ~ ~ s ~ a· ~ ~ g~'~' i .§ II!' !. !. ;. * ~ -~ ~i aa,-- aJ -J t 11~ i;~ ~~~~~~a~~I~~~??~~~~~?~~Z???8~~ ~ ~N-~O~~~--.lN~~~~~~~~-~w~-ä~~~~ãoooo WNCOO - \0 00 == N~N =~s·~=== WW 00 ~ ~ - 5i 0 $ - co ~ t::. t::. 8: ::¡ 0 t::. --.I "t::. t::. t::. ~ i ~ ~ ~ \0 ~ Z N ~ ~... ~ ~ en ~. !: ë;' a ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ R- ; ~--.I~ ~ N__~ ~ ~oo - ~8~ ~~~gf~ ~~~pplpp~~~~~pæ~~;~p ~~ io ~~~l~~ ~~&~~(')~~i~~::¡§~n(wã;~= ~~ iz --.I W _ = ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. ~ s. ~. Z co ~ ~ ~. S ~ :;. ~.~. i. i. .... en 0 tr1 en tr1 en _ tr1 _ - tr1 en 0" ~ (')::r t:I"" ",,~ ~ " ~\O"" t:I 8 = gg ,,-- --" W -(') ~ ...- ff "1n ~~~ \000- w~ _~ 0'" 00 NN~ 0 §N' . ::r _00 ~OOVl _ co N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1:1 i r. (IQ rn = "= I tD i ~ & 8 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P O. BOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902-2013 .,. iq95 , ,,, A.G.TUCKER RESIDENT ENGINEER August 4, 1995 Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Va. 22902 Dear Ms. Carey: Attached is a copy of a resolution by the Commonwealth Transportation Board allocating $267,000 in Industrial Access Funds for 1995-96 fiscal year to provide adequate access to GE- Fanuc Automation. Please distribute this information to the Board of Supervisors. Yours Truly, ,~¿~ Gerald G. Utz ~ Contract Administrator ggu\ cc: Ms. Jo Higgins w/attachment Mr. D. R Askew TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Moved by Mr. Newcomb , seconded by Dr. Thomas , that WHEREAS, Section 33.1-221 of the Code of Virginia provides a fund to "...be expended by the Board for constructing, reconstructing, maintaining or improving access roads within counties, cities and towns to industrial sites on which manufacturing, processing or other establislunents will be built under fIrm contract or are already constructed and to publicly owned airports; II and ' WHEREAS, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors has, by appropriate resolution, requested Industrial Access Funds to serve the expanding facilities of GE-Fanuc Automation, located in Albemarle County, and said access is estimated to cost $267,000; and WHEREAS, the expansion of GE-Fanuc Automation is expected to generate up to 500 passenger vehicle trips per day; and WHEREAS, it appears that this request falls within the intent of Section 33.1-221. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that $267,000 of the 1995-96 Fiscal Year Industrial Access Fund, be allocated to provide adequate access to the facilities of GE-Fanuc Automation, located in Albemarle Comity, Project 0763-002-251, M501, contingent upon 1. all necessary right of way, environmental assessments and mitigation, and utility adjustments being provided at no cost to the Commonwealth; 2. the payment of all ineligible project costs, and all eligible project costs in excess of this allocation, from sources other than the Industrial Access Fund; 3. the County's provision of satisfactory documentation of eligible capital outlay by the industry; 4. VDOT determining eligible capital outlay in accordance with current policy and procedure. MOTION CARRIED. July 20, 1995 ALBEMARLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Memorandum DATE: August 3, 1995 TO: Robert Tucker, County Executive FROM: L. A. Reaser, Director of Building Services cI~~ RE: New High School Partnerships Attached is a sample copy of the invitation that was distributed to area organizations regarding the presentation and luncheon scheduled for August 14, 1995. Also attached is the distribution list. The following criteria was established to develop the distribution list: - Major Employers -Major Banks and/or Savings & Loan Organizations -Major Developers, Land Contractors and Suppliers - Media Organizations -Other Organizations, i.e, IBM, Apple, Coke, Pepsi, etc. Please forward this infonnation to the Board of Supervisors. We would appreciate the names of any additional organizations that they feel would be interested in attending the presentation. Of course, we would also appreciate the attendance of any Board member at the presentation. I hope you find this infonnation helpful. Please do not hesitate to contact me on 973-3677, should you have any questions regarding this matter. LAR/sjc Attachments cc: K. Castner, Superintendent COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE ~n-1 '"=1 ~ r;:'1 n \Ì n r;.-' ~ LJ J).J..-'.L--=-"-'~'><.U..I..W..U.!.; ¡ ¡~ )1(\ AUG 3 199~1~ ¡!'lIe-, '._::"_' ,-'" . U '\r..._' ....._~~. "_.--f LA! U EXECUTIVE OFFICE ~AMPLE ...............-.. bATE": ................. . ................... .i:~:~r~Títle¡ It=tþ.þt)fcity state' ..:..............:\ , 1. Dear FtltPQCsaluation).: We are currently in the programming and design phase in preparation for the construction of a New Albemarle County High School, which will be in the shadow of Monticello and located next to the existing Piedmont Virginia Community College. The $23 million dollar facility will provide a unique opportunity for the surrounding community and for Albemarle County Schools. The vision for the new high school is to design a facility that will support not only a rigorous academic program, but life long learning opportunities for the entire area, especially considering that the facility will be in use well into the 21 st Century. In order to hear and evaluate the possibilities for the new high school, we would like to invite you to attend a presentation by the project architects. The School Division would like you to have an opportunity to extend the potential of the facility beyond the limitations of the $23 million total project cost. Perhaps you might visualize a connection as to how this facility could be of mutual benefit to your organization and to the school system. So that we might have an opportunity to hear all possibilities, you, or your representative, are cordially invited to join us for the presentation and lunch on Monday, August 14, 1995 at 12:00 noon, at Sutherland Middle School, located at 2801 Powell Creek Drive, next to Hollymead Elementary School. I feel this would be a wonderful opportunity for us to meet and discuss the mutual benefits of the new high school. Please RSVP by contacting Burnett Curry, of my staff, at 296-5826 by August 7, 1995, If you are interested, at approximately 1 :30pm, we will schedule a tour of Sutherland Middle School which is our most recent facility and will provide an idea of our previous school design. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. I look forward to meeting you on August 14, 1995. Sincerely, Kevin C. Castner Division Superintendent Attendance for Resources PresentationlLuncheon August 3..1995 Andrew Dickens General Manager WUV A Radio Station Anita Shelburne Editorial Writer The Daily Progress Audie Gaddis Branch Manager AmeriData Bill Mustain President & CEO Comdial Corporation Bill Heichman President Investors Management Company Bob Luzader Senior Energy Efficiency Virginia Power Representative Brad Eure General Manager WCHV Radio Carolyn C. Holmes Executive Director Ashlawn-Highland Dale Shumate Manager Blue Ridge Builders Daniel Jordan President Thomas Jefferson Visitor Center Dann Miller Program Director Charlottesville Broadcasting Corporation Dave Watkins Manager Microage David A. Beach President NationalOptronics David A. Baldini President Avionics Specialties, Inc. David Hodge Senior Vice President Nations Bank David Maus Director of Human Resources Sperry Marine, Inc. David Harriman President Michie Company Dean Johnson Vice President CFW Cable/ Communications Deanna Van Derver Customer Services MCI Consultant Deborah Van Eersel Executive Vice President Charlottesville Area Association of Realtors Del Hanley General Manager Adelphia Cable Attendance for Resources Presentation 2 Denny Thomas Publisher and Vice President The Daily Progress Don Borwhat Senior Vice President! GE Fanuc Human Relations Dr. Charles Hurt Virginia Land Company Dwayne Snow Owner Snow's Garden Center Edward S. Yates President First Virginia Bank Elizabeth Ratcliffe Keswick Corporation Frank Kessler Glenmore Developer The Kessler Group Fred McDaniel Plant Manager International Cold Storage Gary \Valker Manager of Operations Murray Electrical Products Gary F. Bartolacci Plant Manager ConAgra Gayle Birckhead Human Resources Nimbus Manufacturing, Inc. Graham Delany President Coyne And Delany Grant Cosner Gus Lorber President Allied Concrete Harold Wright Vice President/ General WVIR- TV Manger Harry G. VanBeek President Kloechner-Pentaplast of America, Inc, Hunter Craig Craig Builders Irve Cox General Manager Entre Computer Center Jack M. Horn President Martin-Horn, Inc. James Haden President Martha Jefferson Hospital Jane D. Dittmar President Charlottesville-Albemarle Chamber of Commerce Jerome Ix Vice President of Frank Ix & Sons, Inc. Manufacturing John H. Hicks General Manager/ Owner WVSY Radio Attendance for Resources Presentation 3 John Prose General Manager The Colonnades John Casteen III President University of Virginia Ken Ackerman MACAA Laura M, Byrnes Personnel & Training Liberty Fabrics Margaret Rooklin General Manager WCYK Radio Marty Bocock Vice President Sprint/Centel- Virginia Michael J. Halseth Executive Director Michael H. Kaplan Kaplan & Company Michael C. Dempsey President Badger Fire Protection Systems Mike Mayo Manager Coca Cola Bottling Company Philip A. Sansone Developer Wilton Country Homes Raymond Phillips Owner Phillips Building Supply Richard Nunley President Better Living, Inc. Rick Cathcart Lakeside Developer Rober Hauser Owner Robert Hauser Homes, Inc. Robert Ballantyne Business Unit Executive K-12 Industry Solutions Unit, International Business Machines Corporation Steve Plonka Manager of Systems IBM Corporation Integration Steve Campbell Central Fidelity National Bank Thomas Baker President Guaranty Savings & Loan Tina Deane Station Manager WKTR Radio W. A. Pace Vice President Jefferson National Bank Wayne Turner President F&M Bank Wayne Pitsenbarger Treasurer Associated Steel Products . . . Attendance for Resources Presentation 4 - Wendell Wood United Land Corporation of America William Crutchfield President! Owner Crutchfield Corporation Yvonne Carey Director of Human Resources Pepsi Cola Bottling Company SENATE OF VIRGINIA CHARLES R. HAWKINS ,9TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT P_O. BOX 818 CHATHAM, VIRGINIA 24531 R 0 u t e ... :) or 0 u r i s m L.. .-.--.,.-. M E E T I N G N 0 T I C E W e d A u 9 u s t 3 0 1 9 9 5 - 3 : 0 0 p . m . A 1 t a v i s t a T r a i n S t a t i 0 n I appreciate the continuing helpful considerations from each locality as ROUTE 29 TOURISM projects are developing and wish to encourage your ongoing commitment of sharing in all phases of our planning. Necessarily, this includes additional funding, and on this date, I hope budgetary items can be assessed. To urge your attentions for Gary Grant's committee's work, please see his letter on the reverse of this notice. Also at this meeting, Danville City Manager Ray Griffin will present preliminary plans for the Tourist Center near the North Carolina line. Looking forward to seeing you at the end or the month, ~;::= 1 August 1995 August I, 1')95 At tent ion: Participants in the US 29 Corridor Tourisw project The steering committee for Senator Hawkins' US 29 Corridor initiative wants to give all of you who have shown interest in our progr~ss ever the ;Jast Yt'ar every chance for input. As we cont inup W 0 r k o! I the Cell t e r S tat e :~ 9 B roc h u r <~ / M a\.-'. pi,"'; ;.: set ;, II. e è' I' e \1' 111 i nut e s to review the PHEI.IMINARY DRAFT enclosed. This i:; the same doc \l men t (a t 90% 0 f act u a 1 s i z e) see n by t h () sew h 0 a t ten d e d the July 12 meeting in Altavista. Although only a black & white version, this first draft consists of a "cleaned-up" map of the US 29 corridor, with the leading historical/cultural/recreational attractions listed on the reverse, These si If,s ;Ire the top choices (no ¡HOre than five per local i ty) listed by respondents to the Questionnaire which went out earlier this year. THIS IS BY NO MEANS A FINAL OH COMPLETE LIST, but a tally of choices by priority. The listing and map are for your review and comment. Please ident i fy omi ssions or inaccuracies--ol1 both the side listing attractions and Ih,lt containing the map. It was noted, for example, at the Altavista meeting that the towns of Lovingston and Hurt were omitted from the IIlap inadvertently. Your comment is vital to ensure this urochure is accurale and comprehensive. Kindly forward your cOIHments, or mark the photocopy enclosed dnd mail il to the address below by Tuesllay, AUGUST 15. I tis I he i n ten t ion 0 f the s lee r i n g c 0 111111 i t tee t 0 h a v e a n e d r I y - final draft of the brochure ready for review at our nexl meeting, set for Wednesday, AUGUST 30, at 3 p.III, at the restored trilin station/Town lIall in Altavisla. Thank \l01j ".~~,i!, '.'Ij y{),:~ (.("'f:; ::U~··~.1 ·,,"-·:'t}':U:~-l·~ji¡ Yours truly, ~~~) Coordindlor -- Send comments or brochure copies .arked wi Ih corrections, additions, omissions, &uggcstiolls to: G ;1 r y (j I i.\ n t c/o D;iliville Area Chamber of Commerce 635 Main Slr-eet Danville, Virginia 24541 dP7~~cL ORDINANCE NO. 95-2.1(6) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 2.1, AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS SECTION 2.1.4, DISTRICTS DESCRIBED OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, virginia, that Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, is hereby amended and reordained by amending section 2.1.4(g), Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal District, as follows: Sec. 2.1-4. Districts described. (g) The district known as the "Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal District" consists of the following de- scribed properties: Tax map 27, parcels 32, 34, 40, 40A, 42; tax map 28, parcels 2, 2A, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6A, 7, 7A, 7A1, 7B, 8, 11, 12A, 17A, 17C, 18, 23B, 32B, 32C, 32D, 34, 34A, 34B, 35, 35B, 37, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D, 38; tax map 29, parcels 2C, 7B, 8, 8B, 8E, 8H, 8J, 8K, 9, 10, 15C, 40B, 40C, 40D, 49C, 50, 54A, 61, 62, 63, 63A, 63D, 67, 67C, 69D, 69F, 70A, 70B, 70C, 70F, 70G, 70H, 70H1, 70K, 70L, 70M, 71, 71A, 73B, 74A, 76, 77, 78, 79, 79A1, 79A2, 79B, 79C, 79D, 79D1, 80, 84; tax map 30, parcels 10, lOA, 12, 17A, 18E; tax map 41, parcels 15, 17C, 18, 37D1, 41, 41C, 41H, 44, 50, 67, 67B, 68, 70, 72, 72B, 72C, 89; tax map 42, parcels 5, 6, 6B, 8, 8A, 8C, 10, lOA, 10D, 25C, 25C1, 37F, 37J, 38, 40, 40C, 40D, 40D1, 40G, 40H, 40H2, 41, 42B, 43, 43A, 44, 53 (part), 58; tax map 43, parcels 1, 1B, 2, 2A, 3, 3A, 3C, 3D, 4C, 4D, 5, 5A, 9, 10, 16B, 17, 18, 18A, 18C, 18E4, 18F, 18G, 18J, 19I, 19N, 19P, 20A, 20B, 20C, 2l, 21A, 23A, 23D, 24, 25A, 25B, 25E, 30, 30A, 30B, 30D, 30G, 30H, 30M, 32H, 33, 33D, 34, 41, 42, 43, 45, 45A, 45C, 45D, 58; tax map 44, parcels 1, 2, 24, 25, 26, 26A, 26C, 27B, 27C, 28, 29, 29A, 29D, 30, 30A, 30B, 31, 31A, 31A1, 31D, 31F, 31G, 32G, 32G1; tax map 59, par- cels 30, 30C, 32, 32A, 34, 35, 82A. This district shall be reviewed no more than ten (10) years from December 17, 1994. * * * * * I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on August 9, 1995. Û~ /é/d7 ~ " ORDINANCE NO. 95-2.1(6) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 2.1, AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS SECTION 2.1.4, DISTRICTS DESCRIBED OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Bo,rd of County supervisors of the County Qf Albemarle, virginia, that Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, is hereby amended and reordained by amending section 2.1.4(g), Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal District, as follows: Sec. 2.1-4. Districts described. (g) The district known as the "Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal District" consists of the following de- scribed properties: Tax map 27, parcels 32, 34, 40, 40A, 42; tax map 28, parcels 2, 2A, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6A, 7, 7A, 7A1, 7B, 8, 11, 12A, 17A, 17C, 18, 23B, 32B, 32C, 32D, 34, 34A, 34B, 35, 35B, 37, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D, 38; tax map 29, parcels 2C, 7B, 8, 8B, 8E, 8H, 8J, 8K, 9, 10, 15C, 40B, 40C, 40D, 49C, 50, 54A, 61, ~2, 63, 63A, 63D, 67, 67C, 69D, 69F, 70A, 70B, 70C, 70F, 70G, 70H, 70H1, 70K, 70L, 70M, 71, 71A, 73B, 74A, 76, 77, 78, 79, 79A1, 79A2, 79B, 79C, 79D, 79D1, 80, 84; tax map 30, parcels 10, lOA, 12, 17A, 18E; tax map 41, parcels 15, 17 C , 18 , 37 D 1 , 41 , 41 C , 41H , 44, 50, 67, 67 B , 68, 7 0 , 72, 72B, 72C, 89; tax map 42, parcels 5, 6, 6B, 8, 8A, 8C., 10, lOA, 10D, 25C, 25C1, 37F, 37J, 38, 40, 40C, 40D, 40D1, 40G, 40H, 40H2, 41, 42B, 43, 43A, 44, 53 (part), 58; tax map 43, parcels 1, 1B, 2, 2A, 3, 3A, 3C, 3D, 4C, 4D, 5, 5A, 9, 10, 16B, 17, 18, 18A, 18C, 18E4, 18F, 18G, 18J, 19I, 19N, 19P, 20A, 20B, 20C, 2l, 21A, 23A, 23D, 24, 25A, 25B, 25E, 30, 30A, 30B, 30D, 30G, 30H, 30M, 32H, 33, 33D, 34, 41, 42, 43, 45, 45A, 45C, 45D, 58; tax map 44, parcels 1, 2, 24, 25, 26, 26A, 26C, 27B, 27C, 28, 29, 29A, 29D, 30, 30A, 30B, 31, 31A, 31A1, 31D, 31F, 31G, 32G, 32G1; tax map 59, par- cels 30, 30C, 32, 32A, 34, 35, 82A. * * * * * I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that. the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on August 9, 1995. ç, ~ ¿J (j O//V-ý c~i, Board of County z?þervisors , " Ddrituted ro &J¡¡rd: ......K -<1- ~~- Ag~1J h~~i Î'iÙ __.Jt"j--; Oj1o ;)o' 6ß.;L ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 2.1, AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS SECTION 2.1.4, DISTRICTS DESCRIBED OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, is hereby amended and reordained by amending Section 2.1.4(g), Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal District, as follows: Sec. 2.1-4. Districts described. (g) The district known as the "Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal District" consists of the following de- scribed properties: Tax map 27, parcels 32, 34, 40, 40A, 42; tax map 28, parcels 2, 2A, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6A, ....L.. 7A, 7A1, 7B, 8, 11, 12A, 17A, 17C, 18, 23B, 32B, 32C, 32D, 34, 34A, 34B, 35, 35B, 37, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D, 38; tax map 29, parcels 2C, 7B, 8, 8B, 8E, 8H, 8J, 8K, 9, 10, 15C, 40B, 40C, 40D, 49C, 50, 54A, 61, 62, 63, 63A, 63D, 67, 67C, 69D, 69F, 70A, 70B, 70C, 70F, 70G, 70H, 70H1, 70K, 70L, 70M, 71, 71A, 73B, 74A, 76, 77, 78, 79, 79A1, 79A2, 79B, 79C, 79D, 79D1, 80, 84; tax map 30, parcels 10, lOA, 12, 17A, 18E; tax map 41, parcels 15, 17C, 18, 37D1, 41, 41C, 41H, 44, 50, 67, 67B, 68, 70, 72, 72B, 72C, 89; tax map 42, parcels 5, 6, 6B, 8, 8A, 8C, 10, lOA, 10D, 25C, 25C1, 37F, 37J, 38, 40, 40C, 40D, 40D1, 40G, 40H, 40H2, 41, 42B, 43, 43A, 44, 53 (part), 58; tax map 43, parcels 1, 1B, 2, 2A, 3, 3A, 3C, 3D, 4C, 4D, 5, 5A, 9, 10, 16B, 17, 18, 18A, 18C, 18E4, 18F, 18G, 18J, 19I, 19N, 19P, 20A, 20B, 20C, 2l, 21A, 23A, 23D, 24, 25A, 25B, 25E, 30, 30A, 30B, 30D, 30G, 30H, 30M, 32H, 33, 33D, 34, 41, 42, 43, 45, 45A, 45C, 45D, 58; tax map 44, parcels 1, 2, 24, 25, 26, 26A, 26C, 27B, 27C, 28, 29, 29A, 29D, 30, 30A, 30B, 31, 31A, 31A1, 31D, 31F, 31G, 32G, 32G1; tax map 59, par- cels 30, 30C, 32, 32A, 34, 35, 82A. * * * * * ~.. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5823 2 t9L MEMORANDUM TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner r11þ July 26, 1995 FROM: DATE: RE: Addition to Moorman's River Agricultural Forestal District The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on July 25, 1995, unanimously recommended approval of the proposed addition to the above-noted agricultural/forestal district. Attached please find a staff report which outlines this addition. Please note that the Board of Supervisors is scheduled to review this addition on August 9, 1995. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. MJS/jcw A TT ACHMENT · # STAFF PERSON: ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING: BOARD of SUPERVISORS PUBLIC HEARING: MARY JOY SCALA JUL Y 24, 1995 JULY 25, 1995 AUGUST 9, 1995 ADDITION to MOORMAN'S RIVER AGRICUL TURALI FORESTAL DISTRICT Moonnan's River District was created on December 17, 1986 for a time period of eight years. Four additions were approved in 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1993. The district was reviewed and continued for ten years from December 17, 1994. An addition was approved in April, 1995. Purpose: The purpose of an agricultural! forestal district is "to conserve and protect and to encourage the development and improvement of the Commonwealth's agricultural! forestal lands for the production of foods and other agricultural and forestal products..." and "to conserve and protect agricultural and forestal lands as valued natural and ecological resources which provide essential open space for clean air sheds, watershed protection, wildlife habitat, as well as for aesthetic purposes." Factors to Consider: The following factors must be considered by the Planning Commission and the Advisory Committee and at any public hearing when a proposed district is being considered: 1. The agricultural and forestal significance of land within the district and in areas adjacent thereto; 2. The presence of any significant agricultural lands or significant forestal lands within the district and in areas adjacent thereto that are not now in active agricultural or forestal production; 3. The nature and extent of land uses other than active fanning or forestry within the district and in areas adjacent thereto; 4. Local developmental patterns and needs; 5. The Comprehensive Plan and, if applicable, the zoning regulations; 6. The environmental benefits of retaining the lands in the district for agricultural and forestal uses; and 7. Any other matter which may be relevant. Effects of a District: 1. The proposed district provides a community benefit by conserving and protecting fannlands and forest; environmental resources such as watersheds, air quality, open space, and wildlife habitat; and scenic and historic resources. 2. The State Code stipulates that the landowner receive certain tax benefits * , and restrictions on public utilities and government action (such as land acquisition and local nuisance laws) to protect the agricultural! forestal use of the land. In exchange, the landowner agrees not to develop the property to a "more intensive use" during the specified number of years the district is in effect. *Since Albemarle County currently permits all four categories of use value assessment, a district designation may not provide any additional real estate tax deductions. Land in a district is protected from special utility assessments or taxes. 3. The State Code stipulates that, "Local ordinances, comprehensive plans, land use planning decisions, administrative decisions and procedures affecting parcels of land adjacent to any district shall take into account the existence of such district and the purposes of this chapter." The district may have no effect on adjacent development by right, but could restrict proposed rezonings or uses by special use permit which are determined to be in conflict with the adjacent agricultural! forestal uses. Districts must now be shown on the official Comprehensive Plan map each time it is updated. 4. In general, a district may have a stabilizing effect on land use. The property owners in the district are making a statement that they do not intend to develop their property in the near future, and that they would like the area to remain in the agricultural and forestal uses. Adjacent property owners may be encouraged to continue agricultural uses if they do not anticipate development of adjacent lands. Location: Moorman's River District is located in the vicinity of Millington, Owensville, and Free Union. This addition is located on the west side of State Route 671 (Ballard's Mill Road) at the intersection of State Route 821 (Blufton Mill Road) north of Millington. Acreage: Moorman's River District contains approximately 10, 320 acres. This addition contains 59.924 acres in one parcel. Time Period: The proposed time period for the addition is the same as for the district when it was reviewed, or ten years from December 17, 1994. AgriculturaU Forestal Significance: Land in the proposed addition is being used for agriculture and forestry. Significant Lands Not in Agricultural or Forestal Production: The use value assessment program is a good indicator of the actual use of the property. Approximately 7.5 acres are enrolled under agriculture; approximately 51.5 acres are enrolled under forestry; and one acre is non-qualifying due to dwellings. Land Uses Other Than Agriculture and Forestry: There are two dwellings on the parcel, including one rental unit. Land Development Patterns and Needs: This area consists of large tracts of land with scattered dwellings. Comprehensive Plan and Zonine Reeulations: Moorman's River District is designated Rural Area in the Comprehensive Plan, and is zoned RA, Rural Areas. The nearest Growth Area is Crozet, a distance of about six miles. A Comprehensive Plan objective is, "All decisions concerning the Rural Areas shall be made in the interest of the four major elements of the Rural Areas, with highest priority given to preserving agricultural and forestal activities rather than encouraging residential development." (p.203) A strategy is, "Actively promote and support 'Voluntary techniques such as agricultural/ forestal districts...." (p. 53) The Open Space Plan shows this area designated as important farmlands and forests. About one- third of the addition is located within an area on Pigeon Top Mountain recommended for mountain protection. There are critical slopes in this area. The addition is also within the South Fork Rivanna Reservoir watershed. Environmental Benefits: Environmental benefits include protection of ground and surface water, wildlife habitat, critical slopes, and open space. Staff Comment: Staff recommends approval of the addition. Aericulturall Forestal Districts Advisory Committee Recommendation: The Advisory Committee at its meeting on July 24, 1995, voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed addition. (Excerpt from minutes is attached.) . . . Agriculturall Forestal Districts Advisory Committee Minutes (excerpt) July 24,1995 Meeting called to order at 7:41 pm. Members present were Stephen Murray, Chair; Joseph Jones, Vice-Chair; Bruce Hogue; Jacquelyne Huckle, Dan Maupin and Bruce Woodzell. Staff present was Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner. Also present were applicants, Edward Foss and Scott Peyton. Addition to Moorman's River AgriculturaV Forestal District Staff presented the staff report. This is a sixty acre addition, with agricultural and forestal uses. There are two dwellings on the property, one is under construction. Staff recommends approval. The Chair asked about the soils. Staff noted the steep, mountain soils on part of the property, with better soils on the lower elevations. The applicant, Mr. Foss, noted that the agricultural use is pasture and hay. There were previously cattle on the property, they are going to have horses also. Mr. Maupin asked if it used to be Keisler's place. He discussed the location with the applicant. Mr. Jones said it would be a good addition because it joins two sections together. Staff noted that the previous addition joined Moorman's River with Sugar Hollow District. Mr. Jones moved to accept the Addition to Moorman's River District. Mr. Hogue seconded the motion. The Committee voted unanimously to recommend approval of the addition. I: \General\Share\Ascala \afadd2.rpt COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5823 Ok ',.f.) August 15, 1995 Joseph W. Ulman Director of Administration University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation 109 Cresap Road Charlottesville, VA 22906 RE: SP-95-17 - University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation Tax Map 76, Parcels 17B and 17B1 Dear Mr. Ulman: The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on AUQust 9. 1995. unanimously approved the above-noted request for a 69 bed hospital on approximately 49 acres zoned CO. Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Use is limited to 60 beds; 2. Use shall not commence until such time as appropriate state and federal approvals have been obtained; 3. Site plan shall not be signed until fire official approval has been obtained; 4. Use shall be for inpatient medical rehabilitation and shall not provide emergency services. Before beginning this use, you must obtain a zoning clearance from the Zoning Department. Before the Zoning Department will issue a clearance, you must comply with the conditions in this letter. For further information, please call Jan Sprinkle at 296-5875. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, u.G~·tJ2 &~' V. Wayne C' mberg -- Director of lanning & Corl1muni evelopment .,. VWC/blb cc: JdÍs. Ella Carey Jo Higgins Amelia McCauley I:\GENERAL\SHARE\BARBARA\UREF .ACT ~~ -'1- í-'"~- 95:>-:' ¿:.f { )/. Ø' ·~3 A; .''#\. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5823 August 2, 1995 Joseph W. Ulman Director of Administration Unversity ofVirgnia Real Estate Foundation 109 Cresap Road Charlottesville, VA 22906 RE: SP-95-17 University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation Dear Mr. Ulman: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on August 1, 1995, unanimoulsy recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Use is limited to 60 beds; 2. Use shall not commence until such time as appropriate state and federal approvals have been obtained; 3. Site plan shall not be signed until fire official approval has been obtained; 4. Use shall be for inpatient medical rehabilitation and shall not provide emergency servIces. Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive public comment at their meeting on AUGUST 9.1995. Any new or additional infonnation regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me, ~~¡J~ William D. Fritz Senior Planner cc: Ella Carey Jo Higgins Amelia McCulley e e e STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: WILLIAM D. FRITZ AUGUST 1, 1995 AUGUST 9, 1995 SP 95-17 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing a 60 bed inpatient acute medical rehabilitation facility. (A detailed description of the use is included as Attachment C). The proposed facility involves the consolidation of several existing facilities. The Zoning . Administrator has detennined this use is a hospital due to its inpatient care, which necessitates a special use pennit. The facility does not provide emergency services. Petition: University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation (UREF) petitions the Board of Supervisors to issue a special use pennit for a hospital on approximately 49 acres zoned CO, Commercial Office [23.2.2(1)]. Property, described as Tax Map 76, Parcel17B and 17B1 is the location of the Fontaine Research Park located on the south side of F ontaine Avenue in the Samuel Miller Magisterial District. This site is recommended for Office Service in Neighborhood 6. Character of the Area: This site is currently developed with one building. The Forestry Department Building is located nearby. The site has been rough graded in accord with the approved master plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance and ZMA 92-03 ånd recommends approval. Plannine and Zonin&: History: The most recent history of this site includes ZMA 92-03 and SP-92-13 which were approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 10, 1993. These actions rezoned the site to CO, and pennitted supporting commercial uses, and research and development activities. A site plan for the Health Services Foundation was approved on April 1, 1993. 'Comprehensive Plan: This area is recommended for Office Service. At time of rezoning it was known that fuwre development of Fontaine Park would have orientation toward University medical facilities. This facility will be developed in conjunction with a specialized medical services center. Although technically considered a hospital because of the inpatient care, this use will be associated with medical offices and is more similar to office use in intensity and affect on the area. In the opinion of staff locating this facility in an Office Service Area would not be in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. 1 e STAFF COMMENT: Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as' pro~ided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adiacent property. During the review of ZMA 92-03 staff reviewed the location of the various buildings, buffers, parking areas and the like to minimize impact on surrounding areas. Staff opinion is that use of any ofthe buildings included on the conceptual plan will not affect adjacent properties. The conceptual plan is included as Attachment D. Additional building space within the development is anticipated to include medical uses which would work in harmony with this facility. There will be no emergency services and associated emergency transport that would affect adjacent properties. that the character of the district will not be changed thereby. e Impact on the character of the district is limited due to the physical layout of the development and nature of this proposed use. The intent of the developer for the research park is to include medical related offices and research facilities. (The existing building in the development is medical related.) This facility may make use of the medical related facilities proposed and currently existing in the development. Due to the physical layout of the development, proffers limiting the development and the character of the existing and intended users of the development, no adverse impact on the character of the district is anticipated. and that such use will be in harmony with the pm:pose and intent of this ordinance. Staff has reviewed the purpose ~d intent of the ordinance and is of the opinion that this request is in harmQny with the ordinance. This opinion is based on the provision of health care in a convenient location and setting. with the uses permitted by right in the district. Approval of this request will have no impact on the permitted uses on this site or adjacent sites. . with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance. e Section 5.0 contains no additional regulations for hospitals. However, Section 5.0 does contain regulations for Rest Home, Nursing Home, Convalescent Home, Orphanage. Staff opinion is that the regulations for these types of facilities are appropriate to the review of this type of facility. Staff will address each of the provisions of Section 5.1.13: a. Such uses shall be provided in locations where the physical surroundings are compatible to the particular area; 2 e As has been stated previously the design of this development was addressed at the time of the rezoning. The intent of the design was to provide substantial open area leading to a campus atmosphere. Staff opinion is that this facility is consistent with the design goals of the development. b. _No such use shall be established in any area either by right or by special use permit until the Albemarle County fire official has determined that adequate fire protection is available to such use; . A site plan will be required to accommodate this use. The fire òfficial is a member of the site' review committee and no site plan shall be approved without the fire official approval. c. Generally such uses should be located in proximity to or in short response time to emergency medical and fire protection facilities. Uses for elderly and handicapped should be convenient to shopping, social, education and cultural uses; This is a medical rehabilitation facility that should not demand all of the same emergency services as uses generally reviewed under this section, e Staff notes that this site is within a four minute response time of the Charlottesville/Albemarle Rescue Station. The Community facilities plan notes on page 71 "A fire station is necessary in the western portion of the Urban Area to serve Neighborhood 6 and the Ivy area." The fire station located on Route 250 adjacent to the UV A police station provides improved service to the area. d. No such use shall be operated without approval and where appropriate, licensing by such agenc.ies as the Virginia Department of Welfare, the Virginia Department of Health, and other such appropriate local, stated and federal àgencies as may have authority in a particular case. The applicant has applied for a certificate of need. Staff has included appropriate conditions to insure appropriate licensing. and with the public health. safety and general welfare. Typically when deternlining the potential impact on the public health, safety and general welfare staff comments address access or issues identified by the Health Department. Staff notes that this application provides for health care services which is in harmony with the public health, safety and general welfare. e The Department of Transportation has provided comments addressing this request, Attachment E. These comments are similar to those made by Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) at the time of the rezoning. The comments address the need for improvements at the intersection ofthe bypass and Fontaine Ave. It is noted in VDOT current comments and the comments made at the time of the rezoning that improvements would be required due to the 3 e e e . anticipated normal traffic incrt:ases. At the time of rezoning the staff report stated "Following multiple meetings involving UREF, VDOT, PACC Tech, and/or staff involving various road improvements/ contributions on behalfofUREF, VDOT AND STAFF RECOMMEND THAT PROFFER #1 ADEQUATELY ADDRESSES ROAD IMPROVEMENT NEEDS AS MAY BE OCCASIONED BY THE PROPOSED UREFIFORESTRY DEVELOPMENT." The proffers of the rezoning are included as Attachment F. The improvements required by Proffer # 1 have been constructed. Based on the previous comments of staff, VDOT and the action of the Board to approve the rezoning staff opinion is that this request is consistent with the public health, safety and general welfare. SUMMARY: Staff has identified the following factors which are favorable to this request: 1. The use provides for increased and improved medical facilities associated with other medical services intended for this complex; 2. The use is consistent with the intent of the rezoning approved for the site; 3. The use is consistent with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff has not identified any negative factors for this request. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff opinion is that approval of this request is consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and past actions on this site. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this request subject to the following conditions: RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Use is limited to 60· beds; 2. Use shall not commence until such time as appropriate state and federal approvals have been obtained; 3. Site plan shall not be signed until fire official approval has been obtained; 4. Use shall be for i~patient medical rehabilitation and shall not provide emergency servIces. ---------------- ATTACHMENTS: A - Location Map B - Tax Map C - Applicant Information D - Conceptual Plan E - VDOT Comments F - Proffers affecting this property 4 ~, ~ " ~ NTA1 ~ ,,'t- ,;;,-<- ~o " L 6"-" !'-(' ç.. .~ '~ / e .. .c;..' .1>' \.,~ , . ~..,,,, '(' , -~ -f~'~ .(~ 6" ,~ ~.-.' '", '-~~ , t I l \. l @Ð'.." \. \ , I r , , , .... , .I /~-)Œi!J / / ..... '" ~ ..,) o " j' ~ c., ~..! \.. ~"--'.'-"._. ,- '- --§Ju :' L ".. ~'£ '<<é '\ ,., , <ø . ~'1\. @l]", .. ~. ~ '" "'" "'" V" ~ " ,cry IATTACHM~T sf ALBEMARLE COUNTY e 60 ~ 00~ \ ~~k~> ;~y/ vw~. i ( v:~~" \L,i' __.~~"~ ,~1JC.:~:J~~_ ~~. IDE"P V ~ );;_ï .______ ~ ~ I 'OJ" 4, ~-j- , IDEI" J ~ ~~~' , 'p:fu'. -: :a; v I'D¡j · --- /---- . --~I ~ "~ / IDcl~~ ~~~L 10' ¡ '\ ~~=~-~_-~~!j ~- . IOC"11'- " --l .t' 1) .~ ./' A.~,~-- __.¡-- !. ' \r~--U -~i~f~~ _".// 'I I 5 .Oij'; I ~ /'"/ . ,1; .' ~'/""-' ~ l¡i; ~~~jl J ,J J"';A _ SP~l7 ~~ "'\~. 1) / - - ~ ,..\. ~ .--- - - J;'~~ - V.. ," f¿~' /' \- ~-~~ ----\--------- \: 15- 17 1C(1 i \ /' ~~ -_;;y-.t::~N--- __ ~_ ___~ .. A / - nJ----~ - "rW .' >.",,__ l ~ 'b:/;;>'" 50~ - -- __ ) __ _ ____ --- _~ ~~ ---== '--- A . - -". ~--==-~ - ----:; ~ CHARLOTTESVILLE '", ~ ~r 11A / ./ :~_ ~___ ~ . \ _ _ _ __- "1\~ "" £:."'" ::;:-~, .",;." ~ =- .. - ....0. n _ '\- -.~-:-- " ~~~~ ~1L:~,-:~>~'-... <¿'¿~~~J~í~2" ',~~ =. ..._.. .)-y n__-\;~ _< ~-= ~~... .. 24A-~ ~ '" _~7~ '........ · ~"i,~ 0 . }f;;'.. '. .' . 0 ~ _ =--/ -"........ .z, ~~'''.'-''~' ..~.;/' \f_ u=) ~=--_._;r-- / ~~,-- ~ ~. \. (L ----f-~= -1- Ii ':::----.::::, "A...i;¡,~ ~"~-I' /,,,>- -'7' to'"~ - ~~#-~ SECTlDN 1.N/)-~~t..-I'\ ;s'~,.~ ... 4>f- _~~_ __---- ..:; SHERWDDD¿;,RM. _.::.-_¿'7::-~~ .~I' l____,¡ _-~-- / ~o, ~ .~ '/ ?i.:...._'~~,::¡::, ~ 4<C '--- '\"----... - (, ~Jscc . i-r '/.1 --~~4'" Ihl'.~ l ~~. ,,' - '/, :----:: ~ - ~ I ~... l~ K,n. ---' .¡.' _"EJ ..l þ,fo ~..............___ _ --- Ii!! ¡¡;.... ~ -----~.SE I/: w/~ ~~ o'" c .. <,,-.:.----.;: ROUTE -u~.c ~ (/~/. ~~~f~ ' ,1\.. ~~~_ 64 ~. 16R;§ ~-- :;; 16E . 4 J ^/ ~ 'Mji:\ '". ~ -, ~REO'~~'::::::::::::: '7 ~ ".~J~;Æ.j /' 'irtII. ~ij';'; _ =---= ~2-----C;;'. -~~î~Ø!"~~W/ß//' ~~ i~~- (-------\ f;::~<i~~~.~_ ~ ~ >><"'-. ,--- -I-- J..I:...."-~>'4·~W,:;.\··~:tjff~{W~'/~·~;0~D~5/~." ~ ""'-- - / 1 (- § " -/?Ç/ -,ÎJw //¡ wâ//. ~~""'~~~~ ~ ¡,.--- ~'- ,Iv" \ ~':<.~Þ////.//;/~;// ///k~~/ / ///// '///L ,~"" "'~MII:.~èRÈt ~ Iß \- ........:." ~4'o- ""- ~ ~ i ......~' ~-f>",_ 'II I~ jj, ~ / ~ ;11,7' \ ¡ 'Ii I ~ \/ r;::::;:¡ J ~ '-- - - -1 -J I ..........., I ~ j 7" I 1./\' iff I I/~ . - I '\ V J -~ .L I / / ./~ ~ . I e ¡51.( 1~.UJ -- - - - - ---- '\ e ." ----- SCALf IN fEET 100 I~OIl .." ~ 90 SAMUEL MILLER. SCOTT$VILLE AND JACK JOUETT DISTRICTS SECTION 76 ] Je ] J EXECU1TVES~Y Establish a 60-Bed Acute Medical Rehabilitation Hospital j 1 ..J A joint venture (Limited Liability Corporation) between the University of Virginia Medical Center and HEAL THSOUTH Corporation proposes to construct a 60- bed freestanding inpatient acute medical rehabilitation facility. If approved, the facility will be constructed on property located near the intersection of U.S. Route 29 and Interstate 64 in Albemarle County. j The establishment of the proposed project will allow UVMC to provide, through a state-of-the-art facility, enhanced programs for specific patient populations, such as traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury. Additionally, the inclusion of HEAL THSOUTH as a partner will allow the facility to draw upon the development of programs that occur throughout HEALTHSOUTH's national network of rehabilitation facilities. The facility is to be located adjacent to a proposed Neuromusculoskeletal Center, which will house the clinics for the Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Orthopaedics physicians practicing at UVMC. This will enable those physicians to closely follow the progress of their patients who have been admitted to the proposed rehabilitation hospital. j j .~ - Plans for the proposed facility came about as a result of numerous discussions held between representatives of Augusta Hospital Corporation (AHC), Woodrow Wilson Rehabilitation Center (WWRC), University of Virginia Medical Center (UVMC), and HEALTHSOUTH. These discussions were initiated in response to conditions placed upon receipt of a Certificate of Public Need (COPN) requested by the Medical Center to relocate its existing inpatient rehabilitation service from Blue Ridge Hospital to University Hospital. The condition stated that, as part of a plan to improve the financial viability of the UVMC rehabilitation services, administrators and staff of the Medical Center would meet with their counterparts at AHC and WWRC to determine if the delivery of rehabilitation services to residents of Central Virginia éould be improved through the elimination of duplicated services. D I I ...J - - In order to bring this about, three of the five hospitals that provide rehabilitation care in Health Planning Region I have agreed to form a regional network through which the number of rehabilitation beds in the region will be significantly reduced and duplication of services will be reduced or eliminated by looking to the proposed 6O-bed facility to provide acute medical rehabilitation services for all three facilities. At a minimum, 106 rehabilitation beds will be eliminated from service, including "32 from Blue Ridge Hospital, 64 from Woodrow Wilson Rehabilitation Center, and ten from Augusta Medical Center (contingent upon AMC receiving COPN approval for their current application for Skilled Nursing Facility beds). In return, a 6O-bed acute medical rehabilitation hospital will be constructed to meet the demand for - ~ .. e - ...... c:It ~e 'ATTACHMENT C\ inpatient rehabilitation services to residents of Central Virginia and the Shenandoah I p 21 Valley. age CI ..,. The goals of the regional network are (1) to provide a greater continuum of care for patients served by UVMC/HEALTHSOUTH, Augusta Medical Center, and Woodrow Wilson Rehabilitation Center and (2) to better serve the patient population in the most appropriate facility with the most efficient utilizati~n of resources. Documents fonnalizing this network are included as part of this ~pplication. ~.. Key to the network is the interrelationship among UVMC, HEALTHSOUTH, Augusta Medical Center, and Woodrow Wilson Rehabilitation Center. While the proposed 6Q-bed hospital will be used to provide the majority of acute medical rehabilitation care in the region, patient choice will prevail in all cases for utilization of services. For example, patients who are appropriate for admission to Augusta Medical Center's skilled nursing unit and are residents of AMC' s primary service area will be given the choice of receiving care at AMC. Similarly, Woodrow Wilson Rehabilitation Center will be utilized for such services as adaptive driving and vehicle modification evaluation, adaptive driver training, augmentative/alternative communication, power wheelchair evaluations, and so forth. The result is not only continued utilization of existing services, but also more efficient use of the services and facilities. C7 r;i'1 .." LI. LU e The joint venture is proposing to spend an estimated $14,060,625 to construct and equip a 65,800 square foot acute medical rehabilitation hospital. Funding for the project will be ananged through HEAL THSOUTH Corporation through conventional mortgage loan financing. .,. iu. ... .... .... - e - UNIVERSITY RESEARCH PARK Fontaine Avenue County of Albemarle, Virginia """",,'or Univenity of Virginia Real Estate Foundation CÞtonr...dtc. VIr.in.. ".,- b): McKee/Carson "Annen· tAndtelpr ~':'~~~I~~~;: Fe""'ory 1992 En.. if'onmeM. ø JUN. -23' 95(FRlI 11:54 VDOT TEL:804 979 3759 I ATTACHMENT E I I Pa~eo~l e COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSfON611 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902-2013 A. G. TUCKER RiSIDeNT ENGINEER June 23, 1995 July Rezonings Mr_ Ron Keeler Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA, 22902 Dear Mr. Keeler; e The following are our comments; ZTA-~5-03 Scott Peyton The amending of definition would proòably not be a significant impact to infrastructure of road system, however increased traffic may wa~rant more critical review of entrances for geometric8 and the requirement of commercial entranoe standards_ SP-95-17 university of vir~inia Real Estate Foundation. Route 29 C e !t is our estimate that 700 vehicle trips per day could be generated by this hospital alone, I would like to call your attention to a letter from J. A. Echols of March 23, 1~92, that by the year 2011 the ramps for Route 29 interchange will need to be signalized anã upgraded, due to anticipated normal traffic increases. Thi8 total development would hasten theB~ needs in 8-10 years Or leaa. The northbound ramp is presently backing out into Route 29 By-Pass in the AM peak hour. In addition the traffic eXiting from Route 64 WBL ramp ~o Routè 29 has to get back into the main flow of traffic even if it intends. to exit to Fontaine Avenue necessitating a continuous right turn lane between the two interchange~. This particular proposal may not warrant all of these improvements, however as this Park builds out the level of service is going to drop consiãerably along these immediate corridors, without addressing them. I am not aware of any proffered signal, but it would appear a traffic signal ie ultimately going to be warranted at the site entranoe with Fontaine. The installation of such a signal should be the responsibility of UREF. JUN. -73' 9S(FRll '11:55' VDOT TEL:804 g~g 3-5~ r. Li v J I ATTACHMENT E I \ Page 2 , e Page 2 June 23, 1995 Mr. Ron Keeler July ReZonings SDP-9S-1B Bennv Thacker, Route 630 e This does not reflect any significant change to usage of entrance other than delivery of merchandise. The entrance, however has rather poor sight distance to the south and could be improved by cutting of vegetation beyond VDOT right of way if an easement or permission can be obtained. The sight distance to the south is presently 250'+/- and 350' to the north with minor trimming within right of way. I believe this entrance has a number of residents using it. 80 the trimming of brush is recommendeã. SP-9S-19 Gabriele & Euqenia Rausse. Rout. 627 The stream crossing in flood plain must not negatively affect VDOT right of way (i.e. flooding). Yours truly, H. W. Mills Assistant Resident Engineer HWM/ldw cc: Wanãa Moore J. H. Kesterson e -^-~ " ~/ / e e ¡;- 'ATTACHMENT F j 1 Page 11 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development· 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 (804) 296·5823 June 18, 1992 University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation ATTN: David Westby 1709 University Avenue Charlottesville, VA 22906 RE: ZMA-92-03 University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation Dear Mr. Westby: The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on June 10, 1992 approved the above-noted request to rezone 53.52 acres from PD-SC, Planned Development-Shopping Center and R-10, Residential to CO, Commercial Office. Please note that this approval is subject to the following proffers (1-13) set out in a letter from Robert B. McKee to Ron Keeler, dated May 15, 1992, and a 14th proffer agreed to verbally by the applicant at the June 10 meeting. 1. UREF will construct at its expense along its property frontage improvements to Fontaine Avenue as recommended in the City Urban Design Plan and which are further described in the JPA/Fontaine Avenue Neighborhood Study. Generally these improvements will consist of a four-lane, landscaped median divided rpadway which shall be designed to VDOT Collector Roàd standards. Based on traffic studies prepared for the project, these improvements are considered more than adequate to accommodate the additional traffic occasioned by the development of the University Research Park. Specifically, these improvements will consist of: j" (a) an additional full frontage eastbound lane extending from the existing northbound exit ramp of U.s. 29/250 Bypass to the easternmost corner of the property, (b) upgrade of the existing eastbound lane, , , e University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation Page 2 June 18, 1992 (c) provision of a 100-foot taper plus 100-foot right turn lane adjacent to the new eastbound lane, (d) median improvements consisting of curbed landscape median extending from the project entrance west to the Bypass, (e) median improvements consisting of curbed landscape median to accommodate the necessary left ·turn movements into the park from westbound Fontaine Avenue, (f) left turn lane into the project, and (g) two westbound through lanes from the easternmost property line to the northbound on ramp of the Bypass. e Specific design standards and specifications for all turn lanes and construction necessary for the widening of Fontaine Avenue shall be determined upon further discussion with County Staff and VDOT. Construction of these improvements is contingent upon acceptance by the City of Charlottesville in allowing necessary transitions into and within the City limits. Construction of these improvements is also subject to the successful acquisition of additional right-of-way and/or easements necessary for construction within the City limits. 2. UREF will construct at its expense full frontage bikeway improvements to be incorporated behind the curb along Fontaine Avenue. The bikeway shall extend from the northbound off ramp of the U.s. 29, Bypass to the easternmost corner of the Research Park. 3 . UREF will construct at its expense sidewalk improvements along the south side of Fontaine Avenue from the proposed entrance to the Research Park to the easternmost corner of the property. 4. All frontage improvements outlined in items 1-3 above will be undertaken in a manner which will allow further extension of the ultimate road section into the city. e i [ATTACHMENT F \ ~age ~ e University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation Page 3 June 18, 1992 5. - UREF will dedicate sufficient right-of-way to accommodate all roadway improvements along its property frontage. 6. UREF will limit total development on the site to 389,000 square feet of gross building area. Support commercial uses shall be limited in building area to 19,450 square feet. 7. All buildings will be limited to four stories in height. 8. UREF will relocate the existing 18-inch raw water line in a manner acceptable to and in accordance with the standards of the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority. 9. UREF will design and construct at its expense all improvements and upgrades of utilities which are occasioned by the development of the Research Park. e 10. UREF will design and install landscape buffer area as shown on the plan to screen the project from Fontaine Avenue and residential neighborhoods adjoining the Research Park. 11. strict architectural and landscape architectural guidelines and restrictions will be ad~pted which· shall govern the design and construction of all buildigns and parcel specific site development. 12. Best Management Practices will be implemented in all areas of earth distrubing activity. No earth disturbing activity shall be permitted within the limits of the flood plain. 13. UREF'will encourage traffic reduction measures within th~ Research Park through the provision of CTS and UVA bus drop off points and on-site support commercial uses. 14. Development shall substantially adhere to the Proffered Rezoning Application Plan submitted with this petition. In the spirit of section 8.5.6.3, the Director of Planning and community Development is authorized discretion over reasonable variations from the Zoning Appllcation Plan. e l [ATTACHMENT FJ Œ>age ~ e University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation Page 4 June 18, 1992 In order to accomplish phasing of the plan as proposed,. as well as to allow variations in the development schedule, staff was granted authority over approval of all phases of development, as well as administrative approval of all site development plans (and subdivision plats), if any. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the abov.e noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, J Community Development e VWC/jcw cc: Amelia Patterson Jo Higgins Bobby Shaw e I' í'ft't e COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5823 June 18, 1992 University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation ATTN: David Westby 1709 University Avenue Charlottesville, VA 22906 RE: SP-92-13 University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation Dear Mr. Westby: e The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on June 10, 1992, approved the above-noted request to allow supporting commercial uses, research development activities and medical and pharmaceutical laboratories on 53.52 acres to be rezoned under ZMA-92-03. Please note that this approval is for the following uses: 23.2.2.11 Supporting commercial uses (reference 9.0), 23.2.2.12 Research and development activities including experimental testing; and 23.2.2.13 Laboratories-Medical and Pharmaceutical, subject to: 1. Compliance with Section 4.14 Performance Standards of the Zoning Ordinance. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. . Sincerely, () e ,: VWC/jcw cc: Amelia Patterson Jo Higgins ... ~TE_______~~~~___________________ MDÐ\ ITIMID. -5-f:::fl£j£-&;1T--~ MDÐ\ ITIMIWÆ~m~±~~ DEl'ERRID mm ---â!--Æ-~I3¡-L~ Form. 3 7/25/86 Di:;;,it;<;¡:,Ü Ie ;';~:j Jf...:i-:!l'J-, (41"''' ~.~ .\': .,;,. _ 9 ~-'J!.:-'?""3 .·6¿~- COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5823 MEMORANDUM TO: Ella Carey, Clerk V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning & Community Development ~ August 2, 1995 FROM: DATE: RE: CPA-95-03 Use Value Taxation for Open Space The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on August 1, 1995, by a vote of 5-1, recommended approval of the above-noted comprehensive plan amendment. Attached please find a staff report which outlines this amendment. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. VWC/jcw cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr e STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION: BOARD of SUPERVISORS: MARY JOY SCALA AUGUST 1, 1995 AUGUST 9, 1995 CPA-95-03 USE VALUE TAXATION for OPEN SPACE Background: Recently, the County received two applications to permit private golf clubs to . qualify for use value taxation under the Open Space category of the use value assessment and taxation, or "land use tax," program. The Board of Supervisors considered eliminating the Open Space category as a method to prevent golf clubs from qualifying. However, at its meeting on June 14, 1995 (staff report is Attachment One), the Board voted not to adopt an ordinance which would have repealed the special classification for real estate as devoted to Open Space use. The Board received arguments from members of the public that it is important for the County to continue the Open Space category, and that other means should be taken to prevent local golf courses from qualifying for reduced assessments under the use value taxation program. e At its meeting on July 5, 1995 (staff report is Attachment Two), the Board adopted a resolution of intent to amend the Comprehensive Plan, Chapter Four, to establish the consistency of the various park or recreation uses (identified in Attachment A ) with the land use plan, for purposes of qualifying for use value taxation as open space use. The Plan would provide that land being devoted to specifically designated uses either will or will not qualify for the Open Space category. This amendment would evaluate and decide the status of each specific park or recreation use, including golf clubs, as well as uses such as fairgrounds and athletic fields. Discussion: In order for land to qualify for the Open Space category, it must meet both General and Specific Standards found in the 'Manual of the State Land Evaluation Advisory Council (Attachment A). Several determinations potentially could be made under these standards that could be the basis to deny an open space use value application. Staff previously recommended on July 5, 1995, and the Board agreed, that the cleànest method to address the issue of golf courses qualifying for use value taxation is to amend the Comprehensive Plan. This would also establish policy for considering future similar requests. The list of park or recreation uses found in the Specific Standards is not inclusive, but gives . examples of some such uses. In determining which park or recreation uses should qualify under the OlYen Space category, staff opinion is that the phrase, "for community or public use" is of primary importance. Any park or recreation use that can provide a benefit for the general public or the community as a whole should be able to qualify. e Staff has used the Comprehensive Plan, Open Space Plan, and Public Facilities Plan as guides to determine which uses help meet the recreational needs of the County. The Comprehensive Plan, Chapter Two, includes a section, "Open Space," which defines open space and notes that it can 1 e serve varied objectives, including, "To provide active/ passive recreation," Chapter Three includes a section, "Parks and Recreation," which discusses recreational demands and opportunities in the County. The Open Space Plan identifies existing public recreation areas, and recommends studying additional areas for open space/ recreation potential. The Community Facilities Plan contains a section, "Parks and Recreation," which establishes service objectives and standards, and recommendations for efficient provision of services al!d facilities. Identification of a particular park or recreation use in one of these Comprehensive Plan documents is one criteria to establish that the use is serving a public benefit. Of the examples listed in the Specific Standards, the Community Facilities Plan includes discussion of parks, play areas, athletic fields, swimming, boating, and fishing. The Community Facilities Plan also lists additional types of park and recreation uses which help meet the recreational needs of the County. Significantly, it does not mention golf courses or clubs. If there are park or recreation uses not currently mentioned in the Community Facilities Plan, but which, in the Board's opinion, meet a recreational need of the County, then the Comprehensive Plan (or appropriate adjunct plan) should be amended to include those uses. A scout camp is one example; fairgrounds may be another. e A second criteria to establish a public benefit is how available the use is for the general public. If a use has a membership requirement, it may not be available to the general public. Exceptions would be organizations like girl and boy scouts and little league, which have minimal membership requirements. Recommendation: Add the following language to the Comprehensive Plan, Chapter Four, Implementing the Plan, page 225, at the end ofthe section titled, Use Value Assessment (Land Use Tax): .../..lbemMk adopteð fl Use vB:h:le Asse;ssmcftt Ordiftflfiec Oft Atlgtlst 23, 1973. Albemarle County currently has an ordinance, adopted on August 23, 1973, (Code of Albemarle, Sections 8-31 through 8-40) wh.ich permits all four classifications of use value taxation: Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, and Open Space. In order for land to qualify for the Open. Space category, it must meet both General and Specific Standards found in the Manual ofthe State Land Evaluation Advisory Council. In addition to meeting these standards as prescribed by the Code of Virginia, any park and recreation use must also meet all of the following local criteria in order to comply with the General Standards and qualify for use value taxation under the Open Space category. The park òr recreation use: 1. Must prQvide open space which serves the objective, "to provide active/ passive recreation," as discussed in the Comprehensive Plan, Chapter Two, under Open Space; and, e 2 e e e , , 2. Must help to meet the recreational needs of the County as identified in the Community Facilities Plan, the Open Space Plan, or as otherwise defined in the Comprehensive Plan; and, Must be open to the public without any membership requirement. Provided, however, the following use, which is considered as consistent with #2 above in providing an identified commtµÚty need, is excepted from the no membership requirement criteria: a) athletic fields. 3. I:\General\Share\Ascala\CP AGOLF .rpt 3 , . 0II0õ..:::-._._~_ - Attachment One COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY L·...;. ',.. ~ ¡ . _I(¡~ ~r' _·C ON AGENDA TITLE: Ordinance to amend Chapter 8, Finance and Taxation, Article VIII, Special Assessments for Agricultural, H0l1icultural, Forestal and Open Space Real Estate AGENDA DATE: June 14, 1995 ITE~ q~ å ,. 7/ ,- ~'? 1/ 1 ~.ò>¿. , INFORMATION: ACTION: X SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREQUEST: Repeal of the Special Classification for Open Space for Purposes of Use Value Assessment and Taxation CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: AITACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker/Davis REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: The COlmty has established special classifications for real estate which allow for reduced real estate taxes for property being used for certain purposes. Cl.I1TeI1tly property in agricultw"al, horticultw"al, forestal or open space use can qualify for land use assessment. Pursuant to the State Code the County can, at the Board of Supervisors' discretion, designate which of the four classifications it wishes to include in a use value e assessment ordinance. DISCUSSION: In evaluating the open space classification, some concerns have been identified. Under open space standards, five categories ofland qualify for special assessment. These standards identity "open space" as I) park or recreation lands; 2) conservation lands; 3) floodways; 4)historic or scenic areas; and 5)lands identified by the County for no development to assist the implementation of the land use plan. The County Assessor has provided irûorrnation that no property other than land which would otherwise qualify for use value assessment presently benefits from the open space classification. All existing land classified as open space can either qualify as agricultural or forestal land or would continue to receive use value assessment because the. property is under a penn anent open space easement under the Open Space Land Act. This year, however, three applications have been received for properties which would not qualify for land use without the open space classification. One application involves 43 acres that is being bush-hogged. The other two applications are golf courses and related facilities which are seeking land use as "park or recreation lands". If the open space classification is maintained, these applications must be reviewed for compliance with the general and specific standards for the open space classification. The park or recreation use standards specifically recognize privately owned golf clubs and country clubs as qualifying park or recreation lands. If these propel1ies can othelwise meet the open space standards, they would have to be accepted into the land use program. Attached is background infonnation from the County Assessor (Attachment I), the Planning Director (Attachment 2), and the standards for open space as published in the Manual of the State Land Evaluation Advis01Y Counsel (Attachment 3). RECOMMENDATION: The proposed oí-dinance would eliminate the special classification for open space for purposes of use value assessment and taxation. The effect would be that only open space land consisting of20 or more acres subject to a pelmanent easement pursuant to the Open Space Land Act would continue to qualify for open space use value assessment. The adoption of the proposed ordinance would preclude the necessity for consideration of those applications proposing to qualify land for open space use value assessment for tax year 1995. The ordinnnl'P Qee..> u~. t the current . lond u,", prognuu " it appl¡" to agricultuml, hMicultum or for,,',ll,n"'. \@.~ r~_JLUJIJLI \ ~ ' OPENSP.EXE .\ ~\ i JJN - 8 9;6 , '. 95.098 :.' L~ \ ~ _ -;:' \ - r"\r ("'I :orc":" ',r ~ a r - R ~._~ ~_~~ .~'.: · . Attachment Two e D1STI<1CU íE~ T;j ~'"}:\:',i} ",..~!\\J'=t';"~ '- ? :;- COUNTY OF ALBEMARL<E-·~'8.0 7 EXECUTfVES~Y AGENDA TITLE: Golf Courses Qualifying Under Use Value Taxation: Open Space Category AGENDA DATE: July 5, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: ACTION: X INFORMATION: SUBJECTIPROPOSALlREOUEST: To discuss options and to consider methods to eliminate use value taxation for private golf courses in Albemarle. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: A'ITACHMENTS: STAFF CONT ACTlS): Messrs. Tucker, Cilimberg, Benish, Davis REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: At its meeting on June 14, 1995, the Board voted not to adopt an ordinance which would have repealed the special classification for Open Space real estate for purposes of the use value assessment and taxation, "land use tax," program. The Board received arguments ttom members of the public that it is important for the County to continue the Open Space category and other means should be taken to prevent local golf courses ttom qualifying for reduced assessments under the use value taxation program. e DISCUSSION: In order for land to qualify for the Open Space category, it must meet both General and Specific Standards found in the Manual of the State Land Evaluation Advisory Council (Attachment A). Several detenninations potentially could be made under these standards that could be the basis to deny an open space use value application. After consultation with the County Attorney, staff believes that before the pending open space applications are processed, additional direction ttom the Board on opèn space policy as currently stated in the Comprehensive Plan is needed. Two approaches are available: I. The County Assessor could detennine whether the open space use applications are consistent with the current land use plan. Unfortunately, such a detennination is complicated by the vagueness of the Comprehensive Plan and the associated Community Facilities Plan and Open Space Plan, which do not specifically discuss golf courses as a land use, recreational facility or open space amenity. Furthennore, the Comprehensive Plan does not address golf courses or any other park and recreation use as to their consistency with the land use plan for purposes of qualifying for use value taxation as an open space use. 2. The Board could amend Chapter 4 of the Comprehensive Plan to establish the consistency of the various park or recreation uses identified in Attachment A with the land use plan for purposes of qualifying for use value taxation as open space use. The Plan would provide that land being devoted to specifically designated uses either will or will not qualify for the Open Space category. The County clearly has the authority to amend the Plan for this purpose. Such an amendment should evaluate and decide the status of each specific park or recreation use identified in Attachment A, including golf clubs as well as uses such as fairgrounds and athletic fields. e RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the second option is the cleanest method to address the issue of golf courses qualifying for use value taxation and at the same time establish policy for considering future similar requests. Staff recommends the Board pass a resolution of intent to amend Chapter 4 of the Comprehensive Plan to establish the consistency of the various park or recreati()n uses with the land use plan for purposes of qualifying for use value taxation as open space use and which designated uses either will or will not qualify for the Open Space category. JUN 2 9 1995 ~5~~\<>83 · . , ATTACHMENT A I ¡page 1\ 3. A property that is subject to a recorded perpetual conservation, historic or open-space easement held by any public body, or is part of an agricultural, a forestal or an agricultural and forestal district approved by local government, shall be considered to be consistent with the land use plan. STANDARDS FOR ClASSIFICATION OF RFAL ESTATE AS DEVOTED TO OPEN-SPACE USE UNDER TilE VIRGINIA LAND USE ASSESSMENT lAW. e Under the authority of §58.1-3229 et seq. of the Code of Virginia, the Director of the Department of Conservation and llistoric Resources adopts these Standards for Classification of Real Estate As Devoted to Open-Space Use Under the Virginia Land Use Assessment Law to: B. Minimum acreage. I. Encourage the proper use of real estate in order to assure a readily availuble source of agricultural, horticultural and forest products, an(~ of open space within reach of COI1lTIlI mt ions of population. 1. Except as provided in subdivision ß 2 of .his section, real estate devoted to open-space use shatlconsist of a minimum of five acres. 2. Conserve nalural resources' in limns that will prevent erosion. 2. If the governing body of any county, city or town has so prescribed by ordir,ance, real estate devoted to open space shall consist of a minimpm of two acres when the real estate is: :3. Protect adequate and sali: water supplies. a. Adjacent to a scenie river, a scenic highway, a Virginia byway or public property listed in the approved State Comprehensive Outdoor Recrea- , tion Plan, also known as the Virginia Outdoors Plan (the Virginia Outdoors Plan can lx' obtained from the Department of Conservation and Ilistorie Resources at 203 Governor Street, Suite 302, Richmond, Virginia 23219); or r 4. Preserve scenic nmural beillllies and open spaces. 5. Promote proper Jand use planning and the orderly development of real estate IÓr the accommodation of an expanding population. 6. Promote a balanced economy and ease pressures which force Ihe conversion of real eSlale 10 more ilHensive uses. b. Located in a county, city or town havil)g a density of population greater than 5,000 per square mile. According to Ihe specific authorilY and responsibililY AHlveyed by §§,)H 1- 3230 and 5H.I- 3240 of the Code of Virginia, -I(~ Director o( the Department of Conselv,uion and Ilistoric Resources iš dirccted 10 providc a st,lIemcnt of the stan~lanls which shall be applied unilormly throughout Ihe Common- wealth 10 determine if real esta.te is devoted 10 open-space uses. Afler holding public hearings..ihe slmement shall be sent to Ihe Commissioner of the Revenue and a duly appointed assessor 01 each locality adopting an ordinance in compliance with Article 4 of Chapter 32 of Title 58.1, of the Code of Virginia C. Other Requirements. Real estate devoted to open-space use shall be: I. Within an agricultural, a forestal or an agricultural and forestal district entered into pursuant to Chapter 36 of Title 15.\ of the Code of Virginia; §l. GENERAL STANDARDS. 2. Subject to a recÙrded perpetual easemelll Ihm is hcld by a public body and that promotes the open-space use cIassilìcatión as defined in ~58.1- 3230 or the Code or Virginia; or To qualiry as an open-space use, real eSlate must meet the requirements of both this section and the specilic slandards contained in Section 2 of these regulations. The general standards are as lollows. 3. Subject to a recorded commitment cntered into by the landowner with the governing body in accordance with SectiOli 3 of thesc regulntions. ., A. Consistcncy with land use plan. D. Opinions. I. Thc open-space IIse ofthe propert)' l11ust be cOlIsÌ5telH with the land use plan of the COU III y, cilY, or lown which has been made and ¡tdopted oHicially in accordancc with Article 4, Chaptcr II, Title 15.1 of the Code or Virginia. In determining whether a property meets the general and specific standards for open-space use, the local assessing orficer may request an opinion rrom the Director of the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources under the provisions or Section 4 of these regubtions. e 2. A land use consistent Wilh the land LIse plan men liS a use thaI is consistenl with areas or land use zones depicted on a map that is part of the land use plan, or that directly supports or its generally consistent with stated land uses, natural resources conservation or historic preservation objectives, goals or slandards of the land LIse plan. §2. Spedfic Standards The specific standards for determining whether real estate will qualify ror special assessment based on open-space use are as follows. The term "land" includes water, submerged land, wetlands, marshes, and similar properties. A Park or recreation use-Lands that are provided or preserved for: I. Å11Y puhlic. semi-public or privately-owned parle playground or similar recreational area. for !)l\'~IK PI comnu1I1ity use, except any use operated with 1I1\l'n~ eor profit. Examples: -Parks, play areas, athletic fields. hotanical garden'i fishing or skating ponds. -Golf clubs, country dubs, swimming cluhs, beach clubs, yacht clubs, scout camps. -Fairgrounds. 2. Gol f courses operated for profit as a puhlic service and having the park-like characteristics normally aSS\1- dated with a country club. 3. Buildil)gs shall not cover more than 10% 01 the site. \ 4. Commercial recreational or amusement places, such as driving ranges, miniature golf courses, pony ril.lcs. trap shoots, marinas, motor speedways, dra? stripS, amusement parks and the like, shall not quahfy. B. Conservation of land or other natural resources- Lands that are provided or preselVed for forest p~"CSelVes, bird or wildlife sanctuaries, watershed preserves, nature preserves, arboretums, marshes, swamps and similar natural areas. C. Ftoodways-Lands that are provided or preselVed for: I. The passage or containment of waters, including the a Iloodplains or valleys and side slopes of stream~ that . arc or may be subject to periodic or occas.lOnal overllow, such as noodplains identified by eng1l1eer- ing sUlVeys by the us. Corps of Engineers or others, or by soil sUlVeys or topographic maps. Floodways also include adjacent lands that should be re~elVed as additional channels for future noods due to ,"creased rtmolfs. 2. Coastal lowlands, such as bays, estuaries or ocean shores, subject to inundation by storms or high tides. 3. Tidal and Non-tidal wetlands; such as swamps, bogs and marshes. D. llistoric or Scenic Areas-Lands th,Ít arc provided or preserved for historic or scenic purposes arc: I. On the Virginia Landmarks Register or the Natiol~al Register of Historic Places ~lr contr~b~ti.ng properties in an histolk district listed 111 the V1rg1l11a Landmarks Register or the National Register of Historic PI.aces. Information concerning properties on these Registers can he obtained from the Department 01 ConservatÍl,n and Ilistorie Resources. 2. Properties protected by scenic or open-'ip,He easements. e 3. Places designated or recommended at "Scenic" hy the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources, the Department ofli'ansportation, the General Assem- bly or other State agency subject in each c~~e t~ a specific area description provided by the deslgnat1l1g agency. 15 'I ATTACHMENT AI E. Assisting in tbe shaping of tbe character, direction aIHI! Page 21 timing of community development, or for tbe pubUJ . interest-Lands that are officially planned or approved by the local governing body to be left in a relalivcly natural and undeveloped state and that are providcd or preselVcd for the purpose of shaping the locality into neighborhoods and communities, identifying their boundaries, insulat- ing incompatible uses from one another, directing growth, controlling the rate or timing 01 growth or otherwise serving the public intercst as detcrmined by the local governing body. Examples: -Greenbelts, parkways and trailways, -Stream valleys, -Forests and farmlands, -Hilltops or hillsides, . -Mountaintops and mountainsides, -Scenic vistas. §3.. STANDARDS FOR WRITTEN COMMITMENTS BY lANDOWNERS TO PRESERVE OPEN-SPACE lAND USE. The written commitment entered into by landowners (Òr the' local governing body to preselVe open-space land use, pursuant to subdivision 3 of §58.1-3233 of the Code of Virginia, shall conform substantially to the following form of agreement: OPEN-SPACE USE AGREEMENT This Agreement, made this _ day of 19_ between hereafter c;alled the Owner, and the ICounty, City or Townl of . a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, hereinafter c;illed the ¡County, City or Town, recites and provides as follows: I RECIT AL5 I. The Owncr is the owner of certain real cstate, descrihed below', hereinafler called the Propeny~ and 2. The ¡County, City or Town I i~ the local governing hod)' having real estate tax jurisdiction over the Propert)': and 3. The ICounty, City or Townl has determincd: A. That it is in the public imerest that the Propeny should be provided or preserved for Ilnsert one or more of the IÓllowing uses: park or recreational purposes~ \:onser- vation of land; conservation of (Insert description of other natural resource); an historic area; a sccnic arca; assisling in Ihe shaping of Ihe characllT, dirnlion and timing of community development; or OIlier use which selVes the public interest by the preservation of open-space land as provided in the land-use plan.; and . B. That the Property meets the applicable criteria for real estate devoted to open-space use as prescribed in Anicle 4 (§58.1-3229 et seq.) of Chapter 32 of Title 16 Dh-···..·;:·~ ,'j~"'" " ':~)l¡\,....- i.".. .~ ~, c;:. J COUNTY OF ALBEMARLI3-,"~·=_G~fL:-_Z._._-",...~-- '~~ :.'~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Golf Courses Qualifying Under Use Value Taxation: Open Space Category AGENDA DATE: July 5, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: ACTION: X INFORMATION: SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: To discuss options and to consider methods to eliminate use value taxation for private golf courses in Albemarle. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes STAFF CONT ACnS): Messrs. Tucker, Cilimberg, Benish, Davis REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: At its meeting on June 14, 1995, the Board voted not to adopt an ordinance which would have repealed the special classification for Open Space real estate for purposes of the use value assessment and taxation, "land use tax," program. The Board received arguments from members of the public that it is important for the County to continue the Open Space category and other means should be taken to prevent local golf courses from qualifying for reduced assessments under the use value taxation program. DISCUSSION: In order for land to qualify for the Open Space category, it must meet both General and Specific Standards found in the Manual of the State Land Evaluation Advisory Council (Attachment A). Several detenninations potentially could be made under these standards that could be the basis to deny an open space use value application. After consultation with the County Attorney, staff believes that before the pending open space applications are processed, additional direction from the Board on open space policy as currently stated in the Comprehensive Plan is needed. Two approaches are available: 1. The County Assessor could detennine whether the open space use applications are consistent with the current land use plan. Unfortunately, such a detennination is complicated by the vagueness of the Comprehensive Plan and the associated Community Facilities Plan and Open Space Plan, which do not specifically discuss golf courses as a land use, recreational facility or open space amenity. Furthennore, the Comprehensive Plan does not address golf courses or any other park and recreation use as to their consistency with the land use plan for purposes of qualifying for use value taxation as an open space use, 2. The Board could amend Chapter 4 of the Comprehensive Plan to establish the consistency of the various park or recreation uses identified in Attachment A with the land use plan for purposes of qualifying for use value taxation as open space use. The Plan would provide that land being devoted to specifically designated uses either will or will not qualify for the Open Space category. The County clearly has the authority to amend the Plan for this purpose. Such an amendment should evaluate and decide the status of each specific park or recreation use identified in Attachment A, including golf clubs as well as uses such as fairgrounds and athletic fields. RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the second option is the cleanest method to address the issue of golf courses qualifying for use value taxation and at the same time establish policy for considering future similar requests. Staff recommends the Board pass a resolution of intent to amend Chapter 4 of the Comprehensive Plan to establish the consistency of the various park or recreation uses with the land use plan for purposes of qualifying for use value taxation as open space use and which designated uses either will or will not qualify for the Open Space category. ~5~~61083 ;.: ~ '9 95· ._ h. · - I t. Any public, semi-public or priv;,tcly.pwnCl't 11~;1I k. playground or similar teneational area. lor !HI : K pr comnllll1ily use, except ahy use operated wlIh 111I{'n~ (Ór profit. Examples: -\'<1Iks, play areas, athletic fields. hotanÏt<11 garJcl1:' lìshing or skating ponds. -GoH clubs, counlfy clubs, swimming duhs, be<1ch dubs, yacht clubs, scout catllps. -Fairgrounds. 2. GolI" wurses operated for plOfit as;1 puh1ic servlkc <1ntl having the park-like chal<1cteristics 11Orl11al y <1SSP- dated with a country club. J. Ihtl1dlngs shall not cover more than 10% of the site. \ 4. C01l1tl1eld:ll recreational or 111I1USe1l1ent places, sulch as ddving I':lnges, 1I11hiature goH courses, Imny lit. CS, ttap shoots, tnarinas, tnotor. speedways, dra~ Stllps, alnllSe1l1ent parks and the like, shall not quaMy. n, COl1sc:tvntlOlt or lal1(1 or other natural rcsourccs- Lands that al'c plOvided or presclvcd for forest p~'eserves, bil'd or wildlire sctnctttaries, watershed preserves, Mtme þreserves, Ilrbmetums, marshes, swamps and similar Ilallll<11 :t·e:.1s. C. ttoodWà)'s-L1nds that are ptovlded or preserved for: I. The passage or containment of waters, Including tlhe 1100dphtlns or valleys ami side slopes of streal1ls t tat arc 01' may be subject to periodic or occasional overnow, such as noodplains Identified by engineer- ing sUlveys by the US Corps of Engineers or others, or by soil surveys or topogmphlc t1Hlf1S. Floodways also Include adjacent lands tltat shou~d be reselved :ts IIddltlonal channels for future Iloods due to Increased runolfs. 2. Coastàl lowlands, such as bays, eSlllarles or oceal, shores, subject to Inundation by storms or high tides. 3. lid;11 :Ind Non-tidal wetlands, such as swamps, bogs :I11(1111:lrshes. D. IUstotle ot ScenIc Arc:rts-tands th,it arc provided or þreselved fot· historic or sccttÎc PUI poses Ine: 1. 011 the Virginia Laltdhtltrks Register or the Natiol!:J1 Register of lIistmlc places or contr~butlng þl"Opertlcs 1t1 ahltlstot-lc district listed In the VII-glhl:t L1ltdm:trks RegIster or the National Register of Historic I'I.aces. Infotl11atlol1 concerhing properties ot1 tltesc Reglsll'l"s tan be obtained from the Derart!l1et,t 0\ Conservatil'l1 al,d llistorlc Resomers. . 2. I'ropertlcs protected by scenic or open·space easements. is J. Places designated or recomtllendecl at "SCCl1ic" hy the Department or Conservatloh and Historic Resources, tlte DepaHment of1i'anspottatlon, tlte General Asscm- bly or other State agency subjèct 111 eaclt c~~e t? a specHìe :trea description provided by the destgl1atmg agency. 'I'AT'TACHMENT AI E. Assisting ht tlte shaping of tlte character, direction and tlmiug of eoitttttunity development, or for tlte puMic httetest-Lands that are oHìcially planned or approved by Ihe local governing body 10 be left in ;1 rdatively nalural and undeveloped state and that arc provided or preserved for the purpose of shaping the locality into neighborhoods and communities, identifying their boundaries, inslll:1l- jng Incompàtlble uses from one anothet, directing gmwth, controlling the rate or timing 0\ growth or othel-wise servil1g the public inlerest as determined hy the local governing hody. Examples: -Greenbelts, parkways and trailways, -Stream valleys, -Forests and farmlands, -Hilltops or hillsides, -Mountaintops and Inounl:tinsitles, -Scenic vistas. §3.. STANOARbS FOR Wkl1TEN COMMITMENTS IJ"\' lANOOWNERS TO I'RESERVE OI'EN-SI'ACE lAND USE. The written commitment entered into by lamlownet"S (iJt- the' local governing body to prcselve open-space land lise, pUI"Sttant to subdivision 3 of §S8.1- 3233 of the Code of Virginia, shall conform substantially to the following form of agreement: OPEN-SPACE USE AGIŒEMENt- '~his Agreement, made Ihis _ day 01____ ILJ_ between het'eafter çalled the Owner, and the Collhty, City or Town of , a political subdivisiol1 ot the Commonwealth of Virginia, hereinafter called thc ICounty, City ot lawn I, recites and provides as follows: I RECIT AL5 I. The Owner is the owl,er of ceHaln real estate, described helow', Lereirt:Jflt~r called th: Property; alld 2. The ICoullt)', City or Townl is the local govellling bml)' having real estate tllx jutlsdictii}}, over the I'ropeHy: amI' 3. The ICounty, Cit}' or «)wltl "as ddet1nined: A. Tltat it is in tlte public interest that Ihe I'mpel"t}' should be provided or presel'ved for linsert one or l110re of the following Uses: p:Jrk or reer-eat ional ptllJOSCS; col1S!:I"- v;uion of IIInd; conselvation of (Insert descriptiol, of other natllt:J1 resOltrcc); an historic ¡tre:J; a scenic ;1I'e;l; assisting Itt thl' sh:tping of tilt' dtar:ll"ll'I", dirrl"tiol1 and timing of comlnunity devc!opmenl; or olhel' use which selvcs Ihe I}ublic Ìlttercst hy lhe preserv;uion of open-space \;tnd as provided In thc land-use plan.l; and . B. That the Property mccls the apl}licable er-iterià for real estate devoted tò open-space Use as IJfesctibed 111 Article 4 (§S8.1-3229 et seq.) of Chapter 32 of1ïtle 16 ~~~ AUGUST 9, 1995 EXECUTIVE SESSION MOTION I MOVE THAT THE BOARD GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 2. I -344(A) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA UNDER SUBSECTION (7) TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND STAFF REGARDING SPECIFIC LEGAL MATIERS CONCERNING REVERSION. David P. Bowennan Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Charles S. Martin R ivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins Wh,te Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller August 7, 1995 Mr. David J. Toscano Mayor, City of Charlottesville P.O. Box 911 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear David: Thank: you for your invitation to the County Board of Supervisors to listen to the presentation on reversion at tonight's City Council meeting. I would like to reciprocate and invite you and the other members of City Council to attend the County's Public Forum on reversion. The Public Forum will be Wednesday, August 16, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the auditorium on the second floor of the County Office Building. The objective of the hearing will be to present information and have an open discussion by the public on reversion. We invite everyone to attend, ask questions and join in the discussion. We hope that you and the other members of City Council will be able to attend the Public Forum. This forum will afford us the opportunity to hear the comments and concerns of the citizens of Charlottesville and Albemarle County on this important matter. Very truly yours, w~J~ Walter Perkins Chairman cc: Members of the County Board of Supervisors * Printed on recycled paper blkd rl'Vfw AUGUST 9, 1995 EXECUTIVE SESSION MOTION I MOVE THAT THE BOARD GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 2. I -344(A) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA UNDER SUBSECTION (7) TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND STAFF REGARDING PROBABLE LITIGATION REGARDING A TAXATION MATTER.