HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-11-08
ACTIONS
Board of Supervisors Meeting of November 8, 2000
November 10, 2000
AGENDA ITEM/ACTION ASSIGNME~
Joint Me,tina with School Board
~. Discussion: Compensation and Benefits Strategy
. ADOPTED the Compensation and Benefits Strategy as M Thomoson: Proceed as directed by the joint
presented (set out on page 6in the attachment to the Executive boards.
Summary).
. DIRECTED the Planning Team to submit additional report to
the joint boards on December Th. (This meeting has also been
scheduled for 4:30 D.m., in Meetina Room 235.)
. Discussion:. FY 2001 Budget Allocation.
PRESENTED. No action.
Reaular Niaht Meeting Meeting was called to Order at 7:03 p.m., by the
. Call to order. Chainnan. All BOS members present, except Mr.
Bowerman. Ella Carey, Clerk.
. Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
There were none.
).1 Dedication of Woodbrook Property and Drainage Easements. D Hirschman: Forward documents to County
III AUTHORIZED County Executive to sign documents as Executive for signature and proceed as
recommended by staff. recommended.
p.2 Appropriation: Analysis of Criminal HistOfy Records Clerk: Forward signed appropriation fonn to Melvin
Information Systems Grant oo-A3556, $16,000 (Fonn #20031). Breeden and copy appropriate persons.
. APPROVED.
5.3 Update on Status of the Acquisition of Conservation C Goodall: Proceed as directed by the Board.
Easements (ACE) Program.
. EXTENDED the ACE application deadline until January 1,
2000.
. DIRECTED the advertising process to begin immediately in ~ Advertise for applications.
order to establish an Appraisal Review Committee by March 1,
2001.
5.4 Appointment of Architectural Review Board Members. Clerk: Notify individuals of appointments and copy
. REAPPOINTED Timothy M. Michel and Rudolph A. Beverty to appropriate persons.
the Architectural Review Board, with tenns to run from
November 15, 2000 throuah November 14, 2004.
5.5 Set public hearing for proposed FY 2001 Budge Amendment. Clerk: Advertise for public hearing.
. SET public hearlna for December f!'.
6. PUBLIC HEARING on a proposed ordinance authorizing a Joint Clerk: Will forward Ordinance to County AttorneYs
Powers Agreement for participation in a pilot program involving office and copy appropriate persons when it is
the statewide procurement of electrical energy through the received.
Virginia Municipal League. County Attomey's office: Forward agreement to
. ADOPTED the Ordinance and authorized the County Executive appropriate persons.
to execute the agreement.
7. SP-2000-45. Tr~n PCS CVR 362B (Sweenev) (Sian #70). ~ Forward conditions to Planning Department.
. APPROVED SP-2000-45 subject to the ten conditions (Attachment A)
recommended by the staff, with amendments to conditions #1
and #9, and elimination of condition g.
8. SP-2000-47. PantoDS Convenience Center (Sian #86). None.
. APPROVED SP-2()()().47 as recommended by the Planning
Commission.
9. SP-2000-51. David Pastors II rimn PCS' ISian # 51t Cieri<: Forward conditions to Planning Department.
. APPROVED SP-2000-51 as recommended by the Planning
Commission, with amendments to conditions #4c and #9.
10. SP-2000-53. Limited S9rvice Hote' (Sians #36&37\.
. APPROVED SP-2ooQ..53 as recommended by the Planning
Commission.
1 2. Authorize County Executive to sign contract on KIMCO
Property.
. APPROVED.
1 5. Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the Board.
4 Ms. Thomas expressed concem about the shoulders on Route
250. She will pass those concems on to the Route 250 West
Advisory Committee, and she asked that Mr. Tuckerforward
them to Bill Mills of VdoT.
I Ms. Thomas said she gave a presentation to the Architects
Institute of America about the County's DISC Program.
Mr. Perkins said he has received some calls about speeding in
the Eartysville area and also on Route 810 near Ray Jones
house. He also mentioned trucks getting lost in Eariysville and
asked if some signage could be installed.
6. Adjourn to December 6, for joint meeting with Chariottesville
City Council. Meeting was adioumed at 8:20 p.m.
Attachment A - Conditions of Approval
(Attachment A)
~ Forward conditions to Planning Department.
(Attachment A)
~ Maintain original after County Executive's
signature.
County Executive: Communicate these concems
to Mr. Mills.
ATTACHMENT A
Agenda Item NO.7. SP-2000-45. Triton PCS CVR 362B (Sweenev) (Sian #70). PUBLIC
HEARING on a request to anow communication facility incl go' high wood pole, flush-mounted antenna &
ground equipment on 14,747 sq ft leased area of 519.118 ac pel. Znd RA & wlin EC OVenay Zone.
TM94, P17. Loc at 2670 Thomas Jefferson Pkwy (Rt 53) E of Rt 729. Scottsvilte Dist.
APPROVED SP-200Q..45 subject to the following conditions:
1. The top of the pole, as measured Above Sea Level (ASL), shall never exceed seven (7) feet
above the top of the tallest tree within twenty-five (25) feet of the facility at or below the same
base elevation as the pole, measured Above Sea Level (ASL). No antennas or equipment, with
the exception of the grounding rod, shall be located above the top of the pole;
2. The pole shall be designed, constructed and maintained as follows:
a. The pole shall be wood and dark brown in color;
b. Guy wires shall not be pennitted;
c. No lighting shan be pennitted on the site or on the pole, except as provided by condition
number nine (9) herein;
d. The ground equipment cabinets, antenna, and all equipment attached to the pole shan be
dark brown in color and shan be no larger than the specifications as shown on the
attached plan entitled Crown Communications/Carroll Creek:
e. A grounding rod, not exceeding two (2) feet above the top of the pole, and with a width
not to exceed one (1) inch diameter at the base and tapering to a point, may be installed
at the top of the pole;
f. Prior to issuance of a building pennit, the applicant shall provide a statement to the
Planning Department by a licensed surveyor certifying the height of the tallest tree, as
identified in condition number one (1);
g. Within one (1) month after the completion of the pole, the applicant shan provide a
statement to the Planning Department certifying the height of the pole, measured both in
feet above ground and also measured Above Sea Level; and
h. The pole can never extend above the top of the tallest tree, except as described in
condition number one (1) of these conditions of approval, without prior approval of an
amendment to this special use permit;
3. The pole shall be located as follows:
a. The pole shall be located on the site as shown on the attached plan entitled ~
Communications/Carroll Creek: and
b. The proposed facility shall be located not more than twenty-five (25) feet from the existing
access road;
4. Antennas shall be attached to the pole only as follows:
a. Antennas shall be limited to those shown on the attached plan entitled ~
Communications/Carroll Creek:
b. No satellite or microwave dishes shan be pennltted on the pole; and
c. Only flush mounted antennas shan be permitted. No antennas that project out from the
pole beyond the minimum required by the support structure, shall be pennitted. However,
in no case shall the antennas project out from the pole more than twelve (12) inches;
5. Prior to beginning construction or installation of the pole or the equipment cabinets, or installation
of access for vehicies or utilities, a tree conservation plan, developed by a certified arborist,
specifying tree protection methods and procedures and identifying any existing trees to be
removed on the site both inside and outside the access easement and lease area shall be
submitted to the Director of Planning and Community Development for approval. All construction
or installation associated with the pole and equipment building, including necessary access for
construction or installation, shall be in accordance with this tree conservation plan. Except for the
tree removal expressly authorized by the Director of Planning and Community Development, the
permittee shall not remove existing trees within two hundred (200) feet of the pole and equipment
building. A special use permit amendment shall be required for any future tree removal within the
two hundred (200) foot buffer, after the installation of the subject facility;
6. The pole shan be disassembled and removed from the site within ninety (90) days of the date its
use for wireless telecommunications purposes is discontinued;
7. The pennittee shall submit a report to the Zoning Administrator one (1) time per year, no later
than July 1 of that year. The report shall identify each user of the pole and certify that the height
of the pole is in compliance with condition number one (1);
8. No slopes associated with construction of the pole and accessory uses shall be created that are
steeper than 2: 1 unless retaining walls, revetments, or other stabiliZation measures acceptable to
the County Engineer are employed;
9. Outdoor lighting shall be limited to periods of maintenance only. Each outdoor luminaire shall be
fully shielded such that all light emitted is projected below a horizontal plane running though the
lowest part of the shield or shielding part of the luminaire. For purposes of this condition, a
luminaire is a complete lighting unit consisting of a lamp or lamps together with the parts
designed to distribute the light, to position and protect the lamps, and to connect the lamps to the
power supply; and
10. The pennittee shall comply with Section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance. Fencing of the lease
area shall not be pennitted.
Agenda Item NO.9. SP..2000-51. Qavid Pastors (Triton PCS) (Sian # 51), PUBLIC HEARING
on a request to allow construct of personal wireless facility w/99' tall wooden monopole (7' above height
of tallest tree wlin 25'). Znd RA & EC. TM55, P93. Contains approx 21 acs. Loc on Half Mile Branch Rd
(Rt 684), at Yancey MiUs, approx 1/8 mt N of intersec w/HiIIsboro Ln (Rt 797). White Hair Cisl.
APPROVED SP-200o-51 subject to the following conditions:
1. The top of the pole, as measured Above Sea Level (ASL), shall never exceed seven (7) feet above the
top of the tallest tree within twenty-f1Ve (25) feet of the facility at or below the same base elevation as the
pole, measured Above Sea Level (ASL). No antennas or equipment, with the exception of the grounding
rod, shall be located above the top of the pole;
2. The facility shall be designed, constructed and maintained as follows:
a. The wooden pole shall be natural dark brown color;
b. Guy wires shall not be pennitted;
c. No lighting shan be permitted on the site or on the pole, except as provided by condition number
nine (9) herein;
d. The ground equipment cabinets, antennas, concrete pad and all equipment attached to the pole
shall be dark brown in color and shall be no larger than the specifications set forth in the attached
plan entitled "Yancey Mills";
e. The antennas shall be painted dark brown in color, to match the color of the pole;
f. Only flush mounted antennas shall be pennitted. No antennas that project out from the pole
beyond the minimum required by the support structure, shall be permitted. However, in no case
shall the antennas project out from the pole more than twelve (12) inches;
g. Prior to issuance of a building pennit, the applicant shall provide a statement to the Planning
Department by a registered surveyor certifying the height of the tallest tree, as measured both in
feet above ground and also elevation Above Sea Level from the same base elevation within
twenty-five (25) feet of the pole;
h. Within one (1) month after the completion of the pole installation, the applicant shall provide a
statement to the Planning Department certifying the height of the pole, measured both in feet
above ground and in elevation Above Sea Level (ASL); and
i. The pole shall not extend above the top of the tallest tree, except as described in condition
number one (1) of this special use pennit without prior approval of an amendment to this special
use permit;
3. The facility shall be located as shown on the attached plan entitled "Yancey Mills"
4. Equipment shan be attached to the pole only as follows:
a. Antennas shall be limited to the sizes shown on the attached plan entitled "Yancey Mills";
b. Satellite and microwave dishes are prohibited; and
c. A grounding rod, whose height shall not exceed two (2) feet and whose width shall not exceed
one (1) inch diameter at the base and tapering to a point, may be installed at the top of the pole;
5. Prior to beginning construction or installation of the pole or the equipment cabinets, or installation of
access for vehicles or utilities, a tree conservation plan, developed by a certified arborist, specifying tree
protection methods and procedures and identifying any existing trees to be removed on the site both
inside and outside the access easement and lease area shan be submitted to the Director of Planning
and Community Development for approval. All construction or installation associated with the pole and
equipment building, including necessary access for construction or installation, shall be in accordance
with this tree conservation plan. Except for the tree removal expressly authorized by the Director of
Planning and Community Development, the permittee shall not remove existing trees within two hundred
(200) feet of the pole and equipment building. A special use pennit amendment shan be required for any
future tree removal within the two hundred (200) foot buffer, after the installation of the subject facility;
6. The pole shall be disassembled and removed from the site within ninety (90) days of the date its use for
wireless telecommunications purposes is discontinued;
7. The pennittee shall submit a report to the Zoning Administrator one (1) time per year, no later than July 1
of that year. The report shan identify each user of the pole and shall identify each user of the pole and
identify each user that is a wireless telecommunication service provider;
8. No slopes associated with construction of the pole and accessory uses shan be created that are steeper
than 2: 1 unless retaining walls, revetments, or other stabilization measures acceptable to the County
Engineer are employed;
9. Outdoor lighting shall be limited to periods of maintenance only. Each outdoor luminaire shall be fully
shielded such that alf light emitted is projected below a horizontal plane running through the lowest part of
the shield or shielding part of the luminaire. For purposes of this condition, a luminaire is a complete
lighting unit consisting of a lamp or lamps together with the parts designed to distribute the light, to
position and protect the lamps, and to connect the lamps to the power supply;
10. The pennittee shall comply with section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance. Fencing of the lease area shan
not be permitted;
11. The applicant shall obtain and record a tree preservation easement on Tax Map 55/ParceI19D, to protect
the trees providing screening between the proposed facility and the right..of-way; and
12. The applicant shall submit a revised set of site dravvings to the Department of Planning and Community
Development, in order to ensure that all conditions of this special use permit and the ARB Certificate of
Appropriateness are reflected in the drawings. The revised drawings must be approved and signed by
Planning staff and the Design Planner prior to the issuance of a building pennit for construction d the
facility.
Agenda Item No. 10. SP~2000-53. Limited Servi~ Hotel (Sians #36&37). PUBUC HEARING
on a request to extend approval period, & modify conditions of approval, for SP-98-47, approved by the
Board on 1/13/99, for hotel w/restaurant. Znd C1 w/proffers. TM32, P41D. Contains 37 acs (proposal is
on 4.5 acs of). Loc on Rt 29, just W of intersec of Rt. 29 & Timberwood Pkway. Rivanna Dist.
APPROVED SP-200o-53 subject to the following conditions:
1. The use authorized by this special use permit shall be developed as a limited service hotel, not to
exceed one hundred (1oo) rooms in size, in general accord with the applicant's justification dated
8/21/98 and initialed "SET" (copy attached);
2. The use authorized by this special use permit shall be limited to approximately 4.5 acres in size;
and
3. The final site plan for the limited service hotel shall not be approved until after approval of a
development plan for the entirety of Tax Map 32, Parcel 41 D.
lewe
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Wood brook Properties & Easements for Dedication
AGENDA DATE:
November 8,2000
ITEM NUMBER:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Board Acceptance of Dedication of Property and Drainage
Easement
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Foley, Mawyer, Hirschman
ATTACHMENTS: Map of Regional Stormwater
Management System _______
REVIEWED BY: I
BACKGROUND:
Two property rights in the Woodbrook neighborhood have been offered for dedication to the County, as described below:
1. Woodbrook Lagoon Property (Tax Map 45C. Section 2. Parcel 6): This property encompasses the old Woodbrook Sewage
Lagoon, previously operated by the Albemarle County Service Authority, and now in private ownership. The property is
7.64 acres and is largely occupied by two pond beds and a large complex of wetlands. Due to wetlands, floodplain, and
soils, the development potential of the property is low. The current owners have offered this property for dedication to the
County. The property could be used for regional stormwater quality control, and possibly passive recreational use.
2. Drainage Easement on' Ramm Property (Tax maD 45C. Section 1. Block B. Parcel 11 ): Lot 11 in the Woodbrook
neighborhood includes the outfall pipe from the Rio Hill Detention Basin. The County took over ownership of this basin
in 1998. Over time, the outfall has eroded severely, creating a large scour hole on the residential property. The outfall
pipe is an integral component of the regional public stormwater basin, and should be included in the scope of the County's
maintenance obligation. The property owners are willing to grant this permanent drainage easement.
DISCUSSION:
1. As stated above, the Woodbrook Lagoon property is a large wetland area that could serve public functions for regional
stormwater quality control. The drainage area of the lagoon includes a large section of commercial development along
Route 29 (e.g., Gardens, Rio Hill and Woodbrook shopping centers) as well as residential properties within Woodbrook.
The old lagoon site could be modified to provide water quality benefits to the stream, downstream Carrsbrook streams
and ponds, and the Rivanna River. This strategy would be consistent with Chapter 2 of the Comprehensive Plan and the
County's Water Protection Ordinance. The County's goal for the drainage area is to create an integrated network of public
and private facilities to control flooding, water quality, and the integrity of stream channels. The Woodbrook Lagoon
property may be the first step in an overall strategy to restore and protect the entire Woodbrook stream channel. The
lagoon property also has potential for the development of passive recreational facilities, such as a boardwalk trail through
the wetlands.
The immediate maintenance obligations and costs would be minimal. A plan will be developed for the ultimate use of the
area for stormwater management and/or recreation. The Engineering & Public Works Department is currently coordinating
an environmental assessment of the property and soil testing to determine if any environmental liabilities exist from the
property's formeruse.
2. A drainage easement for Lot 11 in Wood brook is needed to repair the existing erosion at the pipe outfall and keep the area
maintained. The repair work will be done in conjunction with planned improvements to the Rio Hill Basin. This plan
involves reducing storm flows down through the neighborhood to protect residential properties and the stream channel.
At present, the erosion at the pipe outlet is a nuisance and safety issue for the property owners.
GENOA TITLE:
oodbrook Properties & Easements for Dedication
ovember 1, 2000
age 2
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the County Executvie to sign documents to:
1. Accept Tax Map 45C, Section 2, Parcel 6 (Woodbrook Lagoon property) for dedication from the current owners, Mr. Alton
F. Martin and Ms. Nancy Mann McClung with the condition that staff will evaluate all legal issues and the results of the
environmental assessment and determine that environmental liabilities are non-existent or can be dealt through simple
and cost-effective measures.
2. Accept dedication of a drainage easement on Tax Map 45C, Section 1, Block B, Parcel 11 from the current owners, Ms.
Diane and Mr. Scott Ramm, subject to all environmental and legal issues being adequately addressed.
00.225
Woodbrook Regional
Stormwater Management
(
L
~
!t
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Engineering & Public Works
401 McIntire Road, Room 211
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5861
August 14, 2000
7. "'1 ru..rU
Mr. Alton F. Martin
Ms. Nancy Mann McClung
6507 Valley Ridge Court
Austin, Texas 78746
RE: Dedication of Tax Map 45C, Section 2, Parcel 6
Dear Mr. Martin and Ms. McClung:
I understand from Bill Mawyer, Director of Engineering and Public Works, that you are interested in
dedicating the above-mentioned parcel to the County of Albemarle. The County would be interested in
exploring this possibility. Our department would be able to utilize this parcel for the purposes of
regional stormwater management. However, the final decision to accept the parcel would rest with the
Board of Supervisors.
The first step to formalize the dedication is for the two of you, as owners of the parcel, to sign and return
the attached "Intent to Dedicate." Once we receive this document, we will conduct some feasibility
work, including a phase 1 environmental assessment, to focus the County's ultimate use of the land. The
phase 1 environmental assessment would be for the purpose of identifying any environmental
compliance or liability issues that the County would inherit if the land were dedicated. The work will
involve having County personnel and contractors enter onto the land for survey work and studies (this is
mentioned in the Intent to Dedicate ). We would also take the opportunity to clean up the debris jam that
has been the subject of our previous correspondence. These items will be undertaken at the County's
expense.
Assuming that we can proceed with the dedication based on the feasibility work, we will seek the
Board's approval and prepare all other necessary documents.
Thank you for your interest in dedicating this land to the County. Please do not hesitate to contact me
with any questions or comments concerning this matter.
CfZld2~IbJuuv~
Water Resources Manager
DJH/nh
Copy: Mr. William 1. Mawyer, Director of Engineering & Public Works
File: I: \dept\engineer\H i rs hcman \ woodbrookproperty .j ones.doc
FAX (804) 972-4035
....,.
"..~"~. '. ....,
~~~rJ::: i~P'.
~-
Intent to Dedicate Real Property to the County of Albemarle
By signing below, I express my willingness and intent to dedicate real property, described as Tax
Map 45C, Section 2, Parce16 of the Albemarle County real estate records, to the County of
Albemarle. I understand that personnel from the County of Albemarle and its selected
contractors will enter upon the property for the purposes of conducting an envirorunental
assessment, survey work, and clean up of debris in the stream channel. This work will be
conducted at the County's expense.
Alton F. Martin
...-----
1laJVJ\ :27t2-lV.!'- 4f ~(>?--(
Nancy ~ McClung G
!
I
@..... IDLEWOOD
~ @
I', N 33031'26"E'
I~O~!M,.---=-- 250. 79 ' .
",,-.el ' , $4", &2\
. " ( ,. ~e"~ '" \
. ........e"1? .
. " '~\~ m en
\ \.
\\\ !~ ~
\ \ ., Ul
()I -
\\ 0 ()I
.; - -,J
\, .. ~-'-
\ i m
\ \ ~
\' 't
\ '
. \ LOT 8
r~' ~.;; SEC 4
\." . \l 0.8. 397 P.I77
,~ ":\9;
\~ ".~
\(~ ~
~:;;p: ~
I x :::;;...-:::::: .. =--- 9' c<1lc. \
;: ~ TROUGH \ r.Jl LOT 9 Albemarle County, Virginia
( (\~ If J!"\ ~ ~ o.:.E~97\ \7~
\ ~ \ ~ ~~ ~
\ ': f \ ~. ~ /' \
~\ \.\.a~ f<:!fl}~ \ ...\ \, ~~~::\. \11 NOTE:GENERAL ESMT TO
.~~ qV . \).~ VT8T IN D.B.362P.32
... >.:;:' ::."" .,0.\ ;. , !-. /
)//Cl> \ \,'~r~~ " ~ \\
. 0 ~o A ,
. ... ",~.c':1 ~. \1
( . ,,\cl>"c '..'~O~.'!>9 / 'l.
cl> \. " \
. ~o A
/ "'" .'. 0- ",~c..~. \1'
7.64 AC. " '\" \).0.'!>9',. /
. " ..~ / ~
I " ~ ~o" A "
A/ ~~S~~~;,~/" /
. <5>;~7;.. ~ \bo
./ \) ...<t ~O~c. '" ~\\\
i b"'" bldg. 7. ' ,.0' ,
" " J ~\: \ /
)( '\
/ .,
:.;
T.M.61
PAR. 124
----
3=
,..,
,..,-
- 8
(\J
v cD
o V
f'.. <Xl
If)
Z
T.M.61
PAR. 124E
0.8. 610
p. 27
irCXI
set
<Xl
N
M
o
on
Z
o
""
o
...
....
~
""
~
.
o
o
:z:
...
DRIVE (or ROAD) 50'
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON
SEPTEMBER 10,1985 I SURVEYED
THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS
PLAT AND THE TITLE LINES AND
WALLS OF THE BUILDINGS ARE
SHOWN HEREON.
. I;'
: ~~'-tVEPCO
; . O.B.357P.453
'\. i
\:
J
LOT I
SEC.3
0.8. 386 P. 39
I
I
I
I
~
.....
I~
I
PHYSICAL SURVEY
7.64 ACRES
Property of
Servi ce
Albemarle County
Authority
S h 0 wn 0 naP I a tin
0.-8.353 P 455
Located in"Woodbrook"
I
I
/
iron set
\'" fl.
~o" C. '" 1.'0'0
"'~ 'o.\'O~.
0'0. /
---
. "---.
s 6<5 "---.
--- 5< 0 . ?3' ..____
--.:: <$ .
--.::::.: <6"
1:A( ~ IV
. 6, ""'--.
P4~C~1..
'?S
/'
en
.~~ ~ LOT 16A
~ 1\)0.--
./' ~ -A_ SEC. 6
,./ - ()I 0.8.416 P.268
1\). .
iron m= '-...
fnd. (;)._
-mOl -------
Q) -A.
. 0 -
Cj !:':!
---
a;
rry- PA; M. 61
/1"0/1 eEL /25.11
. Set
I
ROUDABUSH, GREENE, & GALE, INC.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORA nON
Engineers - land Surveyors - land Planners
Charlottesville, Virginia
~
'"
:z:
~
SCALE: ," = 100'
DATE Sept. 19, 1985 SHEET I of
F'LE 6901
COUNTY OF ALBEMARlE
Department of Engineering & Public Works
401 McIntire Road. Room 211
Charlottesville. Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5861
September 26, 2000
Ms. Diane Ramm
2721 Brookmere Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
RE: W oodbrook Channel - Sewage Problem and Erosion
Dear Ms. Ramrn:
Thank you for your calls recently about the issues at Woodbrook. I spoke with DEQ after you
called, and it seems they are moving forward with their actions. As discussed, I have enclosed
a copy of the DEQ reports on the sewage pump station. These reports were written by Bill
Van Wart, who was the DEQ representative on-site at the time of the sewage leak. According
to Bill, DEQ has assigned a compliance officer to this project. His name is Steve Hetrick
(phone - 540-574-7833). You can contact Mr. Hetrick for the status of their enforcement. My
understanding is that DEQ will be communicating with the owner of the shopping center on
necessary repairs in the near future.
In my discussions with the owner, I understand that they are also moving forward with looking
at their options for correcting the probiem. There will have to be some engineering analysis to
determine what the best option is (e.g., gravity sewer instead of the pump station).
With regard to erosion at the pipe outlet on your property, I have discussed the status of this
project with others in our department. We will be prepared to move forward with making the
repairs at the pipe outlet concurrent with planned modifications to the Rio Hill Stormwater
Basin. This basin was a private facility that the County took over recently since it serves a
function for controlling drainage for the whole neighborhood. Our intention is to cut down on
the amount of flow' coming through that pipe during storm events to better protect the stream
that runs through Woodbrook. Jeff Thomas, an engineer in our office, has been working ona
design for this work. I will work with Jeff to coordinate the construction of these
improvements.
FAX (804) 972-4035
,
Ms. Diane Ramm
September 26, 2000
Page Two
The first step we must take to do this work is to secure drainage easements at the end of the
pipe and along the channel. We will also need access easements from you and possibly other
property owners to get construction equipment to the pipe and channel. The access easements
may be temporary construction easements. To get the process started, I have enclosed an
"Intent to Dedicate Easement" form that you and your husband can sign and return to me at
the address on the letterhead. This form simply indicates your future intent to donate the
easement(s) to the County, and allows us to begin spending public funds to prepare an
easement plat and a design for stabilizing the outlet. I have attached a copy of a survey with
the likely drainage easement area highlighted. If you have any questions about the easements,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
I know this has been a long, involved, and at times unpleasant process for you. There are no
overnight solutions to any of the problems there, but I think through the County, DEQ, and the
property owners working together, we will begin to see progress.
I am available for your comments and questions .on these issues.
4:),' .'
David J. H~SCbman
Water Resources Manager
DJH/ctj
Enclosures
Copy: Bill Mawyer, Director of Engineering & Public Works
Jack Kelsey, Chief of Engineering
Jeff Thomas, Senior Civil Engineer
William Van Wart, DEQ
Steve Hetrick, DEQ
File: hirschman\woodbrookchannel.rammletter.doc
10/17/2000 07:10 FAX 804 924 9065
UVA-EPIDEM&VIROLOGY
IaI 001
,
Intent To Dedicate Draina~e Easement to Countv of Albmarle
Parcel # 45C-oI-B-ll
By signing below: I express my willingness and intent to dedicate a drainage easement across a
portion afmy property to the County of Albmarle for the purpose of repairing and maintaining a
pipe outlet from the Rio Hill Stormwater Basin, The precise limits of the easement across my
property will be d,~termined through negotiation and the engineering design process. My
signature below in no way commits me at this time to any particular easement alignment or any
particular language in the deed of easement.
I also understand that temporary construction easements will also be needed on parts of my
property fair the putpose of gaining access to the work site to make the necessary repairs. The
precise location and limits of these construction easements will be determined at a later date. I
also authorize per'4onnel from the County of Albemarle and its contractors to enter my property
to conduct survey and engineering design work.
~~ r9t- f2~
d!A~
Signature ofLandDwner(s)
Please print lando'..vner name(s) below:
5 '-)
cotll-j~ .......~
:b, ANe... ~~t7rh k--\
Phone <#
Fax # '11 ~ - <+055
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Appropriation - Analysis of Criminal History Records
Information Systems Grant 00-A3556
AGENDA DATE:
November 8, 2000
ITEM NUMBER:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT/PROPOSALlREQU EST:
Request approval of Appropriation 20031 in the amount of
$16,000.00.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Tucker, Foley, Breeden, Walters, Miller, Cavaliere
REVIEWED BY:
r---
BACKGROUND:
This grant project requests professional assistance to examine the Police Department record-keeping systems and to develop
measures to significantly streamline and improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the network. The grant was approved by
the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services for the January 1,2000 to December 31,2000 period.
DISCUSSION:
The study will be funded by a $12,000.00 federal grant and local match of $4,000.00. The local match was transferred from
Police operations in the 1999/00 fiscal year. No additional local funds are required.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of appropriation 20031 in the amount of $16,000.00.
00.235
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR:
00/01
NUMBER
20031
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED?
YES
NO
x
FUND:
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORDS INFORMATION SYSTEM.
CODE
EXPENDITURE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
*** ******* ******** ********** ********************************** ***************************************** *******************
1 1527 31012 312701 DATA PROCESSING CONSULTANTS
$16,000.00
TOTAL
$16,000.00
REVENUE
CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
*** ******* ******** ********** ********************************** ***************************************** *******************
2 1527 33000 330001 FEDERAL GRANT
2 1527 51000 510100 FUND BALANCE
$12,000.00
4,000.00
TOTAL
$16,000.00
TRANSFERS
*** ******* ******** ********** ********************************** ***************************************** *******************
*** ******* ******** ********** ********************************** ***************************************** *******************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
POLICE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISOR
~4"":/9~-~t!
~ /' /GA
c-2: (t7( Ie -dG~
o
--
OCT. 30, 2000
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
//- /c'-t'1C)
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Update on Status of the Acquisition of Conservation
Easements (ACE) Program
AGENDA DATE:
November 8, 2000
ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Update on the status of program start-up items for the ACE
program, including revised program schedule.
ACTION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Foley, Cilimberg, Goodall, Ms. Catlin
REVIEWED BY:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
BACKGROUND:
The Acquisition of Conservation Easements (ACE) Program has moved ahead with program start-up as approved by the Board
of Supervisors following adoption of the ACE ordinance on July 5. The implementation program is designed to insure fair and
equitable participation in the program through a comprehensive marketing plan and standard and accessible application, review
and selection procedures. As implementation moves into the actual general marketing and application stages, there are
several critical dates and issues that need to be brought to the Board's attention.
DISCUSSION:
Several ACE implementation steps have already been accomplished. A part-time staff person, McChesney Goodall, has been
hired and has been working on the program for the last two months. The ACE Committee which was appointed by the Board
during their August meeting has met several times and has been working closely with Mr. Goodall to develop critical elements
of the program. They have developed an application form which will be ready for distribution pending final review by the County
Attorney's Office. They are currently working out details of the easement document, also in cooperation with the County
Attorney's Office. The committee has approved a marketing plan and a fact sheet, copies of which are attached for your
information. They have also approved a promotional brochure, draft copies of which will be available at the November 8
meeting for your information.
Recognizing the Board's desire to make sure that all interested landowners have ample oPP9rtunity to become informed about
and apply for the ACE program if they wish, staff proposes that the application deadline be extended from December 1, 2000,
to January 1, 2001. Because it has already been determined that there will be no tax implications for this year's program, tax
issues have no bearing on when the deadline is established. If the deadline is extended to January 1, staff anticipates that
property recommendations will be presented to the Board for their review by the May day meeting at the latest, which will allow
the Board to commit funds to the selected properties at that time. Following the Board's property selection, easements must
be finalized and property closings completed. Progress on the program from that point on will depend on how quickly these
transactions can be completed, which will be determined to a great extent by outside parties such as property owners and
their legal representatives.
Because this is the 'first year of the program, staff is unsure of exactly how long certain steps in the process may take, but will
be focused on expediting procedures whenever possible to keep to the established schedule. Staff feels confident that the
process and schedule proposed here will permit funds to be committed to property purchase during this fiscal year. In order
to meet the proposed schedule, the Appraisal Review Committee should be appointed and in place by March 1, 2001.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors extend the ACE application deadline to January 1, 2001. Staff also
recommends that the Board begin the advertising process in order to establish an Appraisal Review Committee by March 1,
2001.
00.237
Public Information Plan
Project/Activity:
Acquisition of Conservation Easements (ACE)
OverviewlProject Description:
Marketing plan to promote the ACE program, created to provide the county with a means of
acquiring conservation easements voluntarily offered by owners to protect the county's natural
resources and open spaces from future development.
Stakeholderslfarget Audiences:
1) potential applicants
2) general public
3) environmental community
4) development community
5) elected officials
Concerns/Critical Issues:
1) ACE is voluntary - a land use tool, not regulatory
2) ACE is aimed at lower income landowners, people who don't benefit from other
programs
3) ACE does not put property into the public domain
Public Involvement Objectives:
1) attract potential applicants for ACE program
2) inform general public and interested groups about benefits derived from and status of
ACE
3) promote ACE as part of county's comprehensive efforts at land use management
Proposed Public Involvement Activitieslfimeline:
Finalize information packet
-Application
-Brochure
-Fact sheet
Print brochure
Press release announcing application
availabili
Committee/Ches/Lee completed
November 10
Lee November 8
Update on program to Board of Supervisors Ches November 8
when application packet is complete
Tape radio public service announcement Ches to tape, Lee to mid November
arrange
Paid advertisement announcing ACE kick-off Lee mid November
Target areas of high priority Committee/Ches Begin in mid
-Create composite map to delineate areas November,
-Obtain a map of aglforestal districts ongomg
-Send out info packets to landowners in
identified areas
-Organize community meetings
.Partner with other conservation organizations
Brochure mailing to county landowners with Committee/Ches mid November
100 plus acres
Targeted mailing to real estate offices, estate Committee/Ches mid November
brokers, banks, etc.
Outreach to specialized publications i.e. Rural Lee November 8
Virginian, Real Estate Weeklv, etc.
Develop presentation outline and make Committee/Ches On-going
speakers available to community/
organizational meetings to discuss ACE
Partner with agencies like the Farm Bureau Committee/Ches On-going
and the Virginia Cooperative Extension
Service to educate members through
meetings, information distribution, etc.
Partner with other conservation organizations Committee/Ches On-going
(including PEC, VOF, TNC, DOF) to
publicize program and leverage the
acquisition of easements
Publicize first parcel approved in the program Committee/Ches/Lee As appropriate
~"- -"'!-"~'
ACQUISITION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENTS (ACE) PROGRAM
FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
. What is the ACE program? The acquisition of conservation easements program was
designed to attract lower income landowners who wish to protect the family farm and
the rich resources associated with it. It represents an opportunity for landowners to
voluntarily sell a portion of their development rights to a public agency or charitable
conservation organization to be held in trust for perpetuity. In turn, the agency pays
the landowner the difference between the value of the property prior to the easement
and the value of the property after the easement. The difference in value reflects the
land's value as preserved open space (such as farmland, forestland or rural use)
versus the "highest and best" use (often residential development).
. What is a conservation easement? A conservation easement is a voluntary
agreement negotiated between a landowner and a. public agency or charitable
conservation organization in which the landowner agrees to place specific restrictions
on the use and development of their property. Since it is a voluntary agreement, the
landowner retains ownership of the land and can tailor the easement to meet their
specific goals and vision for the property. To be eligible for various income and
estate tax benefits, however, the easement must meet a minimum standard of
protection to be a "qualified conservation contribution". By promoting a land ethic
and responsible stewardship ofthe property, an easement provides a lasting benefit to
the public through the protection of open space, scenic beauty, wildlife habitats, air
and water quality.
. Who can applv? Any landowner in Albemarle County whose land should remain in
open-space according to the Comprehensive Plan. The County is not legally
obligated to accept an application for purchase nor is the landowner legally obligated
to accept the County's offer to purchase. The Board of Supervisors makes the final
determination to accept each proposal to purchase made by a landowner, provided the
individual purchase reflects the goals of the current Comprehensive Plan.
. How are properties chosen? A ranking evaluation system was established to award
points for a number of values including: 1) open space resources (such as size of
parcel and whether it joins a permanently protected area); 2) threat of conversion to
development and; 3) natural, cultural, historic or scenic resources (such as
mountaintops, working family farms, important viewsheds, scenic highways and
" eII..
rivers, watersheds, productive soils and historically significant properties). Any
property that is awarded a minimum of 15 points may be eligible for consideration,
however, properties in the applicant pool with the highest point total have the highest
priority.
. Does an easement five the public access? No. Since the landowner retains title to
the property, they retain the quiet and private use and enjoyment of it.
. What are the tax advantages of an easement? The gift or sale of a "qualified
conservation easement" enjoys three major benefits: 1) a reduction in the value of the
land in the landowner's estate for the calculation of estate taxes; 2) an exclusion of up
to 40% of the value of the land under easement in the landowner's estate for the
calculation of estate taxes; 3) a reduction in property value which entitles the
landowner to a lower real estate tax assessment and; 4) a charitable income tax
deduction equal to the value of the donated easement (does not apply if the easement
is purchased).
. How do citizens benefit from this program? There is an increasing recognition that
farm and forest land, clean water and air, diverse wildlife habitats, scenic vistas and
rural character have public as well as private value. The ACE Program provides a
means for attaining a balance between landowner's rights and responsibilities and the
public value of rural land. The ACE Program supports the goals of the
Comprehensive Plan by seeking non-regulatory ways of protecting the County's
natural, scenic, cultural and historical resources, promoting a stable, sustainable and
vital agricultural and forestry base, and protecting the County's surface and
groundwater supplies.
. Who decides what a landowner is paitf? An independent, qualified appraiser will
assess the value of the easement. Once a value is determined, the actual purchase
price is based on the aggregate of the annual adjusted gross income for each owner of
record.
. Who administers the ACE profram? The program is housed within the Albemarle
County Department of Planning and Community Development and managed by the
Program Administrator who will work with a 10 person ACE committee to promote
and oversee the program.
For additional information on the ACE program and application forms, please call
Ches Goodall at 296-5823 - extension 3084.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
.
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Mem bars of the Board of Supervisors
Laurie BenUey, C.M.C. o.
Senior Deputy Clerk ~
November 3, 2000 (update) ....
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Architectural Review Board
It is my understanding that you wish to reappoint the following persons to the Architectural Review
Board, with said terms to run from November 15, 2000 through May 14, 2001. Please advise. Thank you.
. Timothy M. Michel
. Rudolph A. Beverly
Cc: Bob Tucker
Larry Davis
David P. Bowerman
Rio
Undsay G. Domer, Jr.
Scolfsville
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Walter F. Perkins
While Hall
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
October 12, 2000
Mr. Timothy M. Michel
1520 West Pines Dr.
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Michel:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 8, 2000, you were reappointed to the
Architectural Review Board, with said term to run from November 15, 2000 through November 14, 2004.
have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience.
, On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to serve the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
/~h~ /J7~
Charles S. Martin
Chairman
CSM/lab
Enclosure
cc: James Camblos
Larry Davis
Amelia McCulley
*
Printed on recycled paper
David P. Bowerman
Rio
Undsay G. Dorrier, Jr.
ScottsviUe
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
COUNlY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Walter F. Perkins
While Hall
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
October 12, 2000
Mr. Rudolph A. Beverly
533 Jester Ln.
Charlottesville, VA 22911
Dear Mr. Beverly:
At the Board of Supervisors meeting held on November 8,2000, you were reappointed to the
Architectural Review Board, with said term to run from November 15, 2000 through November 14, 2004.
have enclosed an updated roster for your convenience.
. On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to serve the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
(U~~~
Charles S. Martin
Chairman
CSM/lab
Enclosure
cc: James Camblos
Larry Davis
Amelia McCulley
<I
Printed on recycled paper
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
FY01 Budget Amendment Public Hearing
AGENDA DATE:
November 8, 2000
ITEM NUMBER:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Request to add two additional items to December 6th Budget
Amendment Public Hearing
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: No
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, White, Davis, Breeden
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The Code of Virginia (15.2-2507) stipulates that the County must hold a public hearing to amend its current FY01 budget
if the additional appropriated amount exceeds 1 % of the original budget or $500,000, whichever is the lesser. The bUdget
amendment public hearing must also be advertised.
At the November 1 meeting, the Board approved a December 6th public hearing date for a proposed amendment to the FY01
operating budget of $562,000 in donations for Esmont Park. Two additional amendment requests need to be added to the
public hearing.
DISCUSSION:
The two additional requests are:
. The school division has received a $674,000 state technology grant to purchase classroom computers, software, etc.
These funds will need to be appropriated into the school division capital improvement program.
. The Capital Improvement Program appropriations approved by the Board on November 1st for $9.77 million also need
to be part of the FY01 budget amendment, since they increase the FY01 Capital Improvement Program by over
$500,000. Although the approved appropriations only carry forward prior year project balances and do not add any new
funding to the CIP, the dollars that will actually be spent in the current year will be $9.7 million dollars more than the
original FY01Capitallmprovement Program appropriated last June. The $9.77 million will be allocated between general
capital projects, school capital projects, storm water projects, emergency communication center, and tourism projects
as outlined in the November executive summary "Appropriation - Capital Improvement Program".
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adding these two requests to the FY01 Budget Amendment public hearing scheduled for December 6th,
00.242
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
Legal Services
P.O. Box 26666, Richmond, VA 23261-6666
"D ..
'1 Glnl..on'"
October 23, 2000
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF VIRGINIA
CASE NOS. PUEOOO343 AND PUF000021
APPLICATION OF VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY,
FOR APPROVAL OF GENERATION FACILITIES AT POSSUM POINT
POWER STATION IN PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA, AND AN
APPLICATION BY VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY, FOR
AUTHORITY UNDER CHAPTERS 3, 4, AND 5 OF TITLE 56 OF THE CODE OF
VIRGINIA TO PARTICIPATE IN LEASE FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
To: LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
Pursuant to the Order for Notice and Hearing (the Order) issued by the State
Corporation Commission of Virginia on October 18,2000, Virginia Electric and Power
Company ("Virginia Power") is hereby serving a copy of the Order "on the chairman of
the board of supervisors of any county and upon the mayor or manager of any county,
city, or town (or equivalent officials in counties, towns, and cities having alternate forms
of government) within Virginia Power's service area." Please take notice of the contents
of the Order.
Thank you.
~C; ?f~./
{/ Jill C. Hayek - (1- . -
Counsel
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
Attorney for
Virginia Electric and Power Company
Enclosure
,
OCT. -18' 00 (WED) 16:55 ope GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL:8043i19S49
P.002
.'
....
COMMONWEALTH OF VIltGlNIA
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 9 5
AT aICHMONO, OCTOBga lS, 2000
APPLICATION OF
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
CASE NO. PTJE000343
For Approval of Genaration Facilities
pursuant to Virginia Code ! 56-580 D
or, in the ~ternae1ve, for ApproVal
of Expenditures pure~ant to Virgin1a
Code S 56-234.3 an4 tor a Certificate
of Publie Convenience and Necessity
pursuant to V1rgin1a Code 5 56-265.2
~
!1i
1"'"'1
, "
-
(".,
c::
L .
! :.
and.
-
~
-::J
"'of
AP~LICATION OF
',..-J
I_J
VIR-GlNIA E!"EC"l'UC AND POWER COMPANY
CASE NO. POF000021
For authority under Chapters ~, 4,
and 5 of ~itle 5G of the Code ot
Virginia to partic1pat~ in lease
f1nanc~ng .r~angement. for
construction of generation
facilities, and for a
declaration of non-jurisdiction
ORDER FOR NOTICE Am) HEARING
On June 1S, 2000, Virg~n~a Electric am1 Power Company
(IlV1rginia };tower-II or "the Compan.yll) filed an applicat:i.on with
the State Co:!:"poration Commission. ("Commi8IiJion") Seeking approval
to reconfigur. the gene~ation units anQ to construct a new
ienerating plant at tha ~ossum Point Power Station in Prince
William County, Vi~ginia (hereafter collectively referred to as
,lithe Project"). The project is proposed to be operational1n
.. .
I
.')
I
OCT.-18'OO(WEDI 16:55 OPC GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL:8043719~49
P. 003
May 2003, and will inorease company-owned gene.ating capacity by
app:ocxime.eely 397 megawa.tt.s (lIMW").
,
Coine1dent wieh its June 16 ~pplication aOQkete~ in Case
No. PUE000343, the Company filed a nMDtion for Determination of
Applicability of, or in the A1te~native, for Exe~t1on or Waive~
from, Bi.dding Rules" ("Motion"). In t.hie Mot 10n , the Company
requeeeed that the Commission find that the Rules Gcvern1ng tohe
Use of Bidding Programs to Pureha.~ Electricity from Other Powe:
Supplier. (IIBidding Rules"), 20 VAC 5-301-:1,0 ~ seq., adopted. in
Case No. PUE900029, were ina~p11cabl. to the Projeot, or
alternatively, ehat the Comm1se1on grant .it an exemption or
waiver from these Rules.
On July 5, 2000. Virginia power f11e4 an application
seeking authority from the Comm1s~ion to partiei~ate in l~ase
tinano1ng arrangements of approximately $300 mil110n :elatins to
the oonstruction of generation facilit1es at the Possum Point
~ower S~ation anO for a declaration that the Commission woul~
not asse~t ~ur1ediction over other parties participating in
these arrangements who will serve as vehicles tor financing the
~rojeet. Among other things, the July 5 appl~cation docketed as
~al5e No. PUP000021 sought approval under Chapters 3 r" 4,2 and S
1 On iru.ly 2"7, 2QOO, an ora.:, Will ='nte:el1, .xt~ndini the CommblliDn'1!I auth~1ey
to ~pprove ehe Compa~" &~1!cae1on under cha~e.r 3 until thirty d.ys aft6r
the eommimlion'8 determination gf the applicability of the Bidding Rul.. and
.at"ha~ :l.IIU.. ;i,c1ec,tifieci .in ~hc CCltMI11111c=" :\lly " Order Inviting COft\ll\enU
and Re8poneea an~ ~rescribin9 No~iae. !!! A~lie.t1on of Vir~1ftia !lectric
and Power cQlm)an~\ 2i'C)~ au1:hcritv under l:nllPte'n 3. t. ad. 5 of Title is elf
.. .
2
I
.,
OCT. -IS' 00 (WED) 16:56 OFG GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL:8043719549
P,004
of Tiele 56 of the Code of Virginia in connection with the
~inanc1ng and lea8ing arrangement a described in that
application.
On July?, 2000. the Virg1nia Committee for Fair Utility
~tes filed a Notice of Protest in this mae~er.
on July ~6, 2000, the Commission issued an Order Inviting
Comments and Reapcnae8 and P~e&c%ib1ng Notic~. This Order
docketed theproceed1ng, ideae1fied es~tain p~eliminary issues
presented in these cases, prescribed publio notioe, and
appointed a hearing examiner ~o make recommendations on ehe
preliminary issues identified therein. The issues on which
comment or request for hearing was sought were;
(1) Whether the Bidding Rules are
applicable to the Projeot, or in the
alternative, if ~hey do apply, whe~her the
Commission should grant virginia power an
exemption to these Rulee.
(:il) Whether ths Commission should approve
the ~roject exclusively unde. 5 56-580 0 of
the Code of Virginia, or under IS SS-234.3,
and/or ~6-26S.~ as well.
(Fn. 1 con't.) the Clode cf Vi~i%1ill to pa.%'eic1pa~. 111 leue financing
.~~anQ.menee for construction 0: generat10n facilities, and for a declaration
on nop-juri8d.1ction, Ca.. NO. )UrOg0021, Doc. COn. Ctr. No. DOO'~022$
(JUly 27, 2DOO, Orc1e.r !xeenO:l.ng Authority) .
; !!! !!!g AI:Il'liCllltion of Vi~in:i... Ellectric: all.Cl 'ower Company, ~C3:' llu~hodey
bdl.- Chllgte:u 3, 4, and 5 of Tide U of the Cod\!: of Vinriniis 'to g&n~d'Dau
in lease financing !~ co~t~o~~cn of ~.ner.t1on f~cilitie.. an4 !~ .
4eelarat~on of non.jU%l.diceion~ Cas. No. ~UPOOOO~1, ~oc. Con. Ctr.
No. 0010101" (Oct. 3, 2000, Order) (app~oving the ccmpauy'. request for
authg~~~y ~o en~er ineo a tin.nci.l ~~~.ae~ion with an aftiliat. un4.~
e~a~~8~ 4 of ~it1e ", cont1ngent upon tAe Comml..io~l. .1..uance of a11
~~4ic1onal, ~equl~e~ au~hcri.ationa, approva18 ana c.rt~t1cate.) .
.. .
3
I
"
,
OCT.-18'OO(WED) 16:56 OFe GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL: 80U719549
P. 005
(3) If S 55-234.3 of the COQe of V~~1n1a
appliQ~ to thi& Project, whether the Company
should ~e granted an exemption from that
provieion, or approval 'under it to make "~t
risk" financial expendit~~s in assoe1ae1on
with the Project.
,'.
On AuguQt 21, ~OOO, S~&~! an~ the company each f11ed
Comments ad.dressing the p~elimin&%y iSIiJ\u.1iJ ;i.cisnt1f1ecl 1n t.ne
JUly 26, 2000, Order.
On August 24, 2000, the Commission's Bearing SKaminar
entered a Protective Ruling 9over~n9 the prooed.ures relevant to
confidential and proprietary 1nformat1on filed. 1nthis matter.
On Septem=er 1, 2000, the Chief Hearing Examiner issued her
Inter1tr\ Report on Prel1m1nary Issue8. In her Report, she made
the following finding8~
:1.. The B1dci1ng Rules are applicable, but a
waiver of tho.e J:'Ules should not be granted.
ana Qoes not appear necessary in this c~se:
2. The Company ehould be d1reeted. t.o
s~pplemene its pre-filed direct testimony
with information on the alternativea bid in
its Jenua~ 1999 and D@cember 1999
sclieitations if relevant to this case. If
not ~el~'Y'&nt, the Cotl\Pany should so advise
the Commission in oomments hereto;
~
3. tt the recent solicitation is not
rel_vant to eone1derat1on of market
alternativ.a herein, the Company ehould be
directed to ~aaue a Request for Proposals on
a parallel track to consideration of this
PZOQj ect J .
4 . The applioation shOUld })e eva.luated
purliJU~t to V1:g1n1a Code is S6-4e (sio),
56-234.3, 56-265.2, anQ 56-SeO Dl
... .
4
I
,~
~
OCT. -IS' DO (lED) 16:56 OPC GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL:8043719S49
p, 006
"
\~
-~_..
5. The Company should file an affidavit and
sche4ule 0: expecte~ expenditures as
described above with its comments to this
Report; an~ ~
G . vi rg1n1A Powe~ .hould be granted inte~im
authority to undertake permit~in9 and
p~el1m1nary li1ite work, and to make financial
expendit~es for the proposed Project at its
own expense and r1ak atihjeet to the
Commission's review of the .uppo~t1ne
a.ffidavit.
The Chist HSilr:J.ng Examiner recommended that the Comm:lssion
enter an order that: adopts the fin=ing~ in ber Interim Report:
g~ant8 the company approval pursuant to S 55-234.3 of the Code
of Virginia to proceed with financial expenditures, pSrm1tting
and preliminary site work as is necesaary to facilitate tbe
timely completion of the Possum Po~nt Project, if finally
approved by the Commission; and establishes a procedural
~chedule to receive evidence on the pending appliQations
applying the sta~utory standard~ for review set tOrth in
Virginia Code SS 56-46, 56-234.3, 56-265.~, and 56-580 D. The
Chief Hearing Examiner 1nv1~ed the parties to the proeeeding to
file comments to her Report with1a seven (7) days of the
Repo:rt I S ~ate.
On saptember a, 2000, Virginia Power filed its Comments on
t!he Interim Report on. Prelimina.ry Issues (tlCommenta"). In its
. .
Comments, among other things, the Company asserted that: t:he
Chie! Hearing Sxaminer'D Report failed to analy~e the .pecial
circumstancee of the Project that warrant an exempt:1on from the
. .
5
(
,,,"
OCT. -IS' 00 (WED) 16:56 ope GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL:8043719549
P. 007
bidrjing p1:'QCOIl8. At page 8 of its September S CottUt\ents, the
Company noted it had conducted two eolieitatione in the ~eeefit
~
p_st, including a December 1999 solicitation ~n conjunction with
ite application docketed as Case No. PUE000009. It assertea
that its Reques~s for Pro~osale .(URPPR) ia the solicitations
sought capacity commencing from 2000 to 2002, and biaG in the
December 1999 so1101ta~ion were due on January 17, 2000.
Virginia Power contended that neither R.FP wall restricted to
peaking capac:ity. Ba.ch R'FP, according to the Company, inc:Uc:atecj
that it was possible that economically prioed base or
intermediate generation could dis~laee some or all of the
peaking capacity, and that such proposale would be evaluated.
!S.:. 1>.c:r;o:-ding to Virginia Power, bids fo% two cOml)ined-cyele
projects w~r~ aubmit~ed in response to ~he second RFP. Virgini~
PowQr eontends that the data received in response to theae
solicitations is recent, that a new solicitation wa$ likely to
provide little, if any, new.i~formation, and that the types of
capacity ~i~ w~re similar to that involved with the Po..um Point
Project. The Company's Septeml:ler 8 Comments continue to aeeert
that its application should be evaluated under 5 56-580 ~ rathe~
than Ii Se.2)4.~ and -265.4 of the Code of Virginia.
~
The September .8 Comm.~tQ also withdrew the Company'S
rsquest for approval of "at t'i.ekn financial expenditures. The
Company adv1ses that a special purpose Subsidiary of Dominion
... .
6
I
I~
OCT. -18' 00 (WED) IG:57 OFe GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL:8043719549
P. 008
Energy, Ino., :rathl!!:r than Virginia Power, made the neeef!lsa:ry
commitments with finaneial institutions for equipment assoQiatea
~
with the Project. Virginia Power noted it wae continuing to
evaluaee whether any construction expenditure. would be
necessary and whether Comm1ss1on approval would be required.
The Company :oep:oesented that it would promptly notify the
Hearing Examiner a1'1d Commia.ion if any "at risk" apPJ:'ovals
b.come neceslary and would fi~e an affidavit, as Se~ forth ~n
thA Interim Report on Preliminary Issues, at that time.
NOW, UPON consideration of the Company's appli~atione, the
Hearing ExAminer'. Report, the Comments thereto, and the
app11ca~le statutes, the Commission is of the opin~Qn and finds
that the Bidding Rules do apply to vi~9inia Powerls Project at
Possum Point. The company ia add111g ea~aeity to ita system when
it propo8ea to construct the 540 MW comb1ned cycle generating
unit. Virginie. Power has an ii\ot1ve ~;j,Qtj1ng p::ogram and,
therefore, is requirea to b~d_oue i~e~.mental generating
capacity additiona or seek an a~~~cpriAe. waiver of the BiQding
Rule!!. Theae rulelil we:-e intended to proV'ide &. broad. anQ
flexible tramework fQ~ oapaclty acquisitions for eleotrio
utilities w~th bidding p:r:09~am.a.a However, II (wl1th l1m1ted
,I(
except1ons,~ all ea~aeity.aQ~1G1t1ons mu8t be conducted through
, C::ommonw.&l1;rh af Virginia, At the nladcm Of the S~ate Cor=orat1on
FOM'."lu101\< Ex Pute, %n the matter of adopting Commiallicn ruJ... for
electriQ capacity ~idd1nQ ~~e~~&mA, Ca.. NO. PUS'0002', 1"0 I.C.C. Ac:.
Rept. 340 (hereafter "Case Ko. Ptm'0002S.).
.. .
"7
I
l')
..
OCT, -IS' 00 (WED) 16=57 ope GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL:8043719549
p, 009
.,
,~. ~
a utility's bidding program. t or It. waiver of the h1ddi.ng rules
must be sought..
Ha~ng found that the Bidding R~les apply, we furcher
conclude that no further bids need be soliQited by the Company.
As indicated in its September 8 ~omments at pages e and 9, the
company conducted two solicitat1one in the recent past, one in
January 1999 and another in December 1.99.9. Neither UP was
restricted to peaking capacity. Two combined-cycle projec~s
were submitted in re8~onae to the second RFP. vt.ginia Power
'.
maintains that tho oapacity was bid in It. time frame close to
that Qf the Project now under conllideration, iand that the types
cf capacity bid were simil~r to that under cone~deration as part
of the Poe~um ~oint Project. Accordingly, the proposed ooata
for construction aupp1ied in tho$e Did. may be cou81dered
reliable evidenoe of the competitive ma~ket cost of su~n
generation.
UnQ'ilX' t.:hese oircumseane.aa -' we will not reqIJi:r;e Virginia
Power to cQnduct a further aolicitat1Qn. Howeve~, we will
further scru~inize the responses t.:o the Company's reeenc R~Ps to
consider whether these ~esponeeB p~e.ene hetter alter.natives
than the Possum poine project now under consideration. We
..
. '
4 Applic:aeion of V1rainia Electric anr:1 Power Company, 1'0% A.~!'Cval of
!xl:lenditure. for N*w Gelullraticn ".etUde. I:lurauant to Va. C04e 5 5'-234.3
and for . certific&te of I:lublic convan1ence ~d D.c...ley ~U%.uant to va.
code 5 56-2S5.~,Ca.. No. PU2ge04S2, 1JJJ a.c.e. Ann. Kept. 428, 4a9.
.. .
e
I
I~
OCT.-]8' 00 (WED) ]6:57 ope GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL:8043719549
hereby direct the Hea.ring Examiner to receive ev:l.c1en~e on ~h.i.s
i llame .
~
With regara to the issue whether this Projeee shoUld b8
consiaereo e~~lus~vely under 8 56-580 0 of the Code ot Vir9inia~
we agree with the Chief Hearing ~a.miner that the Qener~l
Assembly o:!.Q not repeal is 56-234.3 and -265.2 of the Code of
Virg~n1., Therefore. we cannot find that ti 56-sao D is to apply
exc}ueively to ourconaideration of all new generat1Qn project
applica.tions from the date of that staeute's enao'tTnent.. We also
~onclude that g6 56-234.3, -265.2, and -SSO D can and should be
harmonizeo. OUr regulation of the construction and operaeion of
generat~g faoilities now must consider all applicable statutes,
1neluding Sf 56-234.3, -265.2, and -580 D of the Code of
Virginia. These respective statutea empha.eize elightly
different public inte~e8t criteria hy which we must evaluate the
construction and ope;1;'.~1on of generating units such as the
po.sum Poine Project, bu~ they a~e not in conflict.
No ruling ia pre~ently necessary on the i.sue of whether
the Company should be granted an exemption from 5 55-234.3 of
the Code of V1~g1n;i.a 0:' approval under that etat1,1,te to ma]loe "at
riskll financial expenditure.. At pages 12-13 of its September a
..
Commenes, the c:omp~ wit~Ql'ew its request for app:z:-oval of "at
risk" finanoia.l expenditures related to this Projee't. However,
... .
9
I
,~
~
"
P.OI0
: ~
"
. .i
..f
~
$
oct -18' 00 (WED) 16:57 ope GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL: 8043719549
v1~ginia powe~ Appear" to reserve the right to request: "at risk"
app%ovals at a later time.
~
In the event:. the Company later determines to request lIat
rillkll approval with ;:e.pect to this Project, it must file an
affidavi~ with the Commission supporting the need tor such
expen~itures, together with a schedule of when such expenditures
must be made, the expected level of such expendit~e8, and an
explanation of why the Company' eannot wait until the ease ~s
finally deei~e~ to make the .equested expenditures.
Additionally, consistent with the requirements of !5 56-
234,3 and -26$.2 of the C04e ot Vi~1nia, we tin4 that notice
should be given and hearings an theapplicaticns should be held.
The Commission Staff should investigate the captioned
applications and pre.ont its findinge to the Commission in
teatimony.
Acco~dinglYI IT IS ORDERED THAT:
el} As perm1tted unde; t 12.1-31 of the Code of Virginia
ana Rule 7:1 of the commisaion's Rules of Practice and Procedure
("the Rules~), S VAC 5-10-520, this matter is remanded to the
HQaring ~miner to conduct further proceedings on behalf of the
Commdee1on and to ~Lle a final report in this matter with a
."
transcript of this prcceedi~9.
(2) A pUblie hearing for the purpoae of raceiv1ng evidence
relevant to the application as docketed in PUE000343 And
... .
10
I
I')
.
P.011
. :i
..1
::~
,
.,
;
I>
OCT. -18'OO(WED) 16:S8 OFC GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL:8043719549
P.012
PUF000021 is hereDY scheduled for January 16, 2001, before a
Hearing Examiner at 10:00 a.M., in the Commdeeion's seeond floor
:
oourtroom looated in ehe Tyler Building, 1300 East Main St~eet,
Richmond, Virsinia.
(3) V1rg1nia Power shall file a oOPY of ~t8 Dpplicaeions
and all matQriala it. may subsequently file in eM.. p~oceedins in
the Commiss1oa'. Doeument Control center loeaeed on the first
floor of the Tyler Building, 1300 East Main Street, Richmon~,
V1~inia, for public review between the hours of 8:~5 a.m. and
5 t 00 p.m., Monday through Friday, durlftg t.he Comm1E1li1iQn'..
regular bus1ness day!!. purther, Virginia Power shall make a.
copy of its applications and all material. it may subsequently
fila in thi~ proceeding available forpUblio iaapeeeion during
regular business hour~ at the Potomac Community Library,
2201 Opitz ~oulevarQ, woodbridge, Virginia 24191-3377. Copies
of these dOQuments and maceria18 may aleo be orde:ed frOM the
Company's counsel Edward L..F~1p'pen, Esquire, James C. Dim!tri,
Esquire, and Kodwo Ohartey-Tagoe, Esquire, McG~1l"eWoodB LLP, One
James Center, 901 Eaet Cary Street, Richmond, virginia 23219.
(4) On or before November S, 2000, the Company shall
pref11e with the Commission an original and twenty (20) copies
..
ot any a~itional qirect t~Qtimony prOViding the inform~~ion
required by S 56-234.3 of the code of v1~inia, .peci~ical1y
addressing, at a minimum: (i) the Company's pre11~nary
... .
11
I
"
ji.
I
OCT. -18' OO(WEO) 16:58 OFCGENERAL COUNSEL
TEL: 8043719549
P. 013
construction ~lane, and (ii) the plans by wh1ch Virginia Power
will monito:!:' sueh cQnstructicn 1::0 ensure that the work is done
~
in a proper, expeQitioue, and efficient manne~. In addition,
suoh testimony eh~ll address whetber any ot the b1ds received in
ehe ~anuary .n~ Decembe~ 1999 sclicitationM represent a better
alternative than the Project under considerat1on, togQtbe~ ~ith
any information the company intends to present 1n support of the
applieaticns during ~he public. hearing to b& convened on
J$nuary 16, 2001.
~
(S) on Or before November 9, 2000, the Company shall
eo~lete the publication of the following notice, to be
pUblished as aisplay advertising (not class1tie~) once a week
for two (2) ooneeeutive weeks in newspapers having general
circulae10n in prince W11liam CQunty, Virginia:
NOTICE '1'0 THE PUBLIC OF A:PPLICATIONS BY
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POili:iR COMPANY FOR
CERTIFICATE 01' Pt.1BLIC ~ONVENIBNCE ANt>
NSCESSITY FOR GENERATION FACILITIES AND
fOR AUTHORITY .Tet PARTICIPATE IN LEASE
FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS :FOR. CONS'1'RtJC'rION
OP GENERA~ION PACILITIES
CASE NOS. PUE000343 AND PUP000021
Jt
On J~ne 16, 2000, virg1nia Electric and
Power ce~any ("Virginia PoweX'" or "the
Company.') filed with the State Co~oration
Commission (IICommi .sion n) an a1'Plicat1on to
take two existing oil-fired generating units
(Uni ts 1 and 2) out of service, convert two
existing ~oal-fii.Q units (~ite 3 and 4) to
natural gas, and CQn8t~ct a new oombined-
cycle generating unit with a rateo capacity
of 540 megawatts (collectively "the
~roject") at the Possum POine ~ower Station
.. .
12
!~
.
OCT. -J8' 00 (WED) 16:58 OFe GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL: 8043719549
P.014
.,
,
located in P~inQe Wil11am County, Virginia.
This appl1cat10n was QocketeQaa Case
No. PUE000343. The Company ma,1.ntains that
it will not ha~ to aoquirt!l any aadi tional
real p~operty to CQn.t~ct the new
generatins ~n1t and that no add1t1onal
ri9ht8~of~~ay will be needed to connect the
new unit. to :l.ts transmisaion liIyatem. The
new generating unit i8 ,expected to cost an
e~timated $280 to $300 million.
:1
':~
"1
,
j
1
~
on July 5, 2000, Virginia ~ower filed
another application related to the Project
seeking authority f~om the Commission to
participate in lease financ~n9 arrangements
of a.pproximately $300 million for
construction of the prOpOS6Q gene.ating
fac111e1ec. As pa~t of this application,
among other things, the Company .eeke a
4ecla~a=~oa that the Commission will not
assert jurie~etion over certain ocher
~inan~1ng parties to toe transaction,
including an affiliate of the Company, as
public utilities. The July S .pplication
seeks approv.l under Chapter 3 of Title S6
of the Code of Virgin1a, ~ecau8e the
fina~cing arrangements may be considered to
create an evidence of inaebtedne8$, under
Chapte~ 4 of ~itle 56 of the Virginia Code
because the transaction will involve
jurisdictional contra~t. Q~ arr.ngemen~8
between Virginia power and a sUbsidiary of
Dominion Energy, Inc., an affiliate of
Virginia Power, and-under Chapter 50f
Title 56 of the Cc4e of Virginia because
Virginia Power proposes to transter real
property at Possum Point, by means of a
ground lease, on which the new facility will
be constructed ana will be reacquiring the
con8tructed facility ana related real
property all a ~Ublea8e. The July 5
applicat10n has been docketed as Case
No. PUlOO.0021.
i
~f
,;
,
.{
~
i"
'.
'.
l
,
t
1
,
By Order dated October 3, 2000, the
Commission granted Virginia Power authority
to enter into a finan~~al trane~ct1on wi~h
an affiliate in Case No. PUF000021 purQuant
.. .
13
I
.\
I
t'
OCT. -IS' aO(WED) 16:SS ope GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL: 8043719549
P.015
to Cha~tl!lr 4 of Title 56 of ehe Cod.e of
Virginia, contingent upon the Commission's
subsequent i..~ancQ of all additional,
r.qui~ed authori~aticns, approvale, and
ce~e1fiea~ee. All oeher iasues raised in
Ca&e No. PUP000021 rema1n under the
Commission's review and are subject to
fuxther order of the Commission.
A public heaX"1ng to rec:eivQ Qv1Qence
relevant to V1~gi~ia Power's applications in
Case Nos. PU2000343 and PUF000021 will be
convened on January 15, ~OC1, before a
Hearing Examiner at 10;00 a.m. in the
Commi..~on'. second floor courtroom located
in the Tyler Building, 1300 East Main
Street, R1ehmond, Virginia 23219.
A copy of each application is availahle
for public ~nspeeti~ between the hours of
8:15 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in the Commiss1on'lJ
Document Control Cente~ located on the first
floor of the Tyler Building, 1300 East Main
Street, Richmond, v1rg:1nia 2321~. A copy of
e&Qh application i. Available for public
inspeotion during regular buainess hours at
the Potomac Community Library, 2201 Opit~
Bouleva.d, Woodbridge, Virgini& 22191-3377.
A copy of each applioation, tosether with
copies of any materials aub8equently fil~d
herein, may also be obtained from Virgin1a
Power's counsel At che address noted below.
.
~ereon8 interested in pArt~c1patin9 in
the prooee6ing as a ProteQtant aa defined in
~he Commiss~on'8 Rules of practice ana
Prooedure are directed to the Comm1ssion's
Order for Not~ce and Hearing tor specific
procedural instruction.. This Order may ~e
requeste~ from Virg1n1a power by writing to
the company's cotin.el, Sdward L. ~11ppen,
Esqui.e, James C. Dimitri. E8qu1~e, and
KodwQ GhU't:ey-Taso~, Esquire, McGuireWood.8
LLP, One Jame. Cen~sr, 901 East Cary Street,
Ri~hmond, Virginia 23219-4030.
Any 1nteresteQ person aes1%ing to
comment in writing on Virginia Power's
... .
14
I
I')
'1.
J
,
"
OCT. -)8' 00 (WED) 16:59 ope GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL: 8043719549
P.Ol6
appliQat~onl may do so by d1.ec:ting such
comments on or before Deeember 5, 2000, to
the Clerk of the Commission, P.o. Box 2118,
Richmond, Virginda 23218-2118, 4~d refer to
Case No. PUS000343.
Any person desiring to make a statement
a.t the pubio hearing c:oncerning Virginia
Powe~l& applications n~ed only appear in the
COmmission's second floor oourt%oom at
9 145 a. m. on the day of the hearing a.mi
identify himself'or herself as a public
w1tneJ. to the Commission's Bailiff.
Individuals with disabilities who
require an accommodAtion to pa~t~cipate in
the hearing should contact the commis.ion at
least seven (7) days before the scheduled
hearing date at 1-eoO-552-7945 (Voice) or 1-
804-371-9206 (TeD).
VIRGINIA ELSCTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
(6) On or before November 9, 2000, the Company shall serve
a copy of its app11cations and this Order, by personal delivery
or by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to: The Honorable John
Paul Woodley. Jr., Sec~et~ry of Natural Resources, P.o.
Box 1475, Richmond, Virginia 23216; and Dennis K. T~eaey,
Director, Depar~ment of Environment~l Quality, P.o. Sox 1009,
RichmdnQ, Virgin1. 23240-000$.
(7} On or before November 9, 2000, virginia Power .hall
serve a oopy of thia Order on ~he chairman of the boaro of
~
supervisors of any county and upon the mayor or manager of any
county, city, or town (or on equivalent officiala in counties,
towns, an4 cities having alternative torms ~f government) Within
V1rgini~ ~owerls service area. Service shall be made by f1ret-
... ~
15
I
I')
'i
I
..
OCT. -18' 00 (WEDl 16:59 ope GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL: 8043719549
P. 017
Qla88 mail O~ delivery to th6cuatomary plAQQ of ~u&1ne&a o~
res1dence of che ~erson served.
,
.~
ee) Any person deairing to Clomment in writing on virginia
Powe~ls applioations may do eo by direClting such comments on or
before December S, 2000, ~o ehe clerk of the st&te Corporation
Commission, c/o t)ocumsnt Control Center, P.O. iOx 2118,
R1chmond, Virginia 23218-2119. Comments must refer to Case
No. PUE00034J. Any pe%scn desiring to make a s~atement at the
~ublic hearing oonoerning the applications need only appear in
.
the CommiGGion'Q QQQon~ floQ~ courtroom at g:4S a.m. on the d~y
of the hearing and ~dent1fy himself or herself to the Bailiff as
a pul:>lic witness.
(9) On or before D80embQr 5, 2000, any per.on desiring to
submit ev1dence, erosQ-examine witnesses, or otherwise
participate ~n the prooeeding ae a proteatant, as defined ~
Rul~ 4:6, 5 VAC 5-10-180, of the Comm1as1on's Rules of Praotige
and Procedure, shall f~le ~ ?riginal and twenty (20) copies of
a Notice of Protest a8 p~ov1ded in Rule 5:16(&), SVAC 5-10-
420 B and shall serve a co~y of the same on Virginia Power's
counsel, Edward L. Plippen, !&qu1%"~, James C. Dimitri, Esquire,
and Xodwo Ghaney-Tagota, Elilqu1re, Mc:GuireWoods LLP, one James
~
Center, SOl Bast C~:ry Stre~t, ~ichmond, Virginia 23219-4030.
The Notice of Protest shall ref.r to Case No. POE000343.
... .
16
I
l"ll
~
~
OCT. -18' OOIWED) 16:59 ope GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL:8043719549
(10) Within five (5) day. of receipt of a Notiee of
~rotast, the COmpany ;bal1 serve upon eaeh Protestant a copy of
thi& O~der, a.copy of the applioations, a~d a copy of all
mate~1&ls available for ~ublic review now or hereafter filed
w~th the CommiQsion.
(11) on or before Deoember 15. 2000, any person
pa~tioipat~ng as a Protestant pursuant to Rule 4:6, 5 VAC 5-10-
180, shall file with the Cle=k of the Comml..ion an or!g1nal and
origlnal and twenty (20) ooples of its P~otest as p~oviQed in
Rule 5:16(0), 5 VAC 5-10-420 C, together w~th an original and
twenty (20) copie8 of the prepare~ testimony and e~~1ts the
Protestant intends to preeent at the hea:ing, refer.~n9 to Case
No. PUB000343, and shall simultaneoualy serve a copy thereof on
Vi~inia Power1e coun~el and on any other Prete.tants. The
Protest ahall set forth (i) a precise sta~e~nt 0; the inte~.t
of the Protestant in the proeeadin91 (ii) a full and clear
statem~nt of the facts which the p~otestant i8 prepare~ to prove
by competent evidence; and Ciii) a seaeement of ~he apeQ1f1c
re11ef sought and the legal baB~S therefor. Any co~o~te
entity that wishe. to submit evidence, oroes-examift8 witnesses,
or otherwise participate aG a Prote8t~t must be rep~eBented by
J
legal counsel in 4~co~dance with the reqai.ement of Rule 4:A of
the Commission'S ~u1e8 of Practice and Proce4ure, 5 VAC $-10-
210.
- ~
17
I
.\
I
P.018
".
.
~
,
)
.~
'j
J.
~
~
~
~
l'
.
OCT. -18' 00 (WED) 16:59 OFC GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL: 8D43719549
(12) The Commission staff shall analyze Virginia Power's
applications and, on or before Deeember 15, 2000, shall fil~
..
,
with the Clerk of, thti commission an original and twenty (20)
copies of the prepared teseimony ano exhib1ts it 1nten~8 to
present at the puDlic hearing.
(13) On or before Janua%Y 2, ~OOl, the Company shall file
with the Clerk Qf the Commission an ori5J1nal and twenty (20)
copies of any testimony it expe~ts to ~ntroduce in rebuttal to
the di~ect pretilGlQ tee~imony of Staff and Protestants.
,
Ad~tional rebuttal evidence may be presented without prefi11ng,
provided it 1EJ in rGl&lponse tQ evidence which was not pref.ilec1
but elieite~ at the time of the hearing an~, provided further,
the need tor addit10nal rebuttal evidence 18 timely addressed by
motion during the hearing and leave to prellJene eaic! evidence 1s
granced by ehe Commission. A copy of the prefilec.i rebuttal
evidence shall be served upon the Ccmm1ssion Staff and all other
part1es to the proceeding on. 0: before JAnua~ 2, :aOOl.
e 14) At the commencement of the hearing scheduled herein.
Virs:i.nia PoweX' shall previde. to the Commission proof of the
notice and servioe required by order1ng pe.zoCl9raphs (4), (5),
5nQ (6) herein.
..
AN A'I'TES'I'BD CO~y hlJreo~ shall .be sent OJ.'' the Clerk of the
Comm:i./lsion to: pamela L1obnson, Ssquire,a.nd Jill C. He.yek,
Esquire, Virginia Electric and power Company, 701 East Cary
... .
18
I
.,
.
"J.:
P. 019
. .J
~
"
';
j
~
:-
,.
~
-~
OCT. -18' 00 (WED) 16:59 OFC GENERAL COUNSEL
TEL: 8043119549
St~eet, One James River Plaza, Richmond, Virg1nia ~321~T
Edward It. Flippen, Esquire, .:Tames e. t)imit:~i. 2.quireJ Kod.wo
Qhartey-T_goe. E$quire, and St.phan H. WaeCI II, Esquire,
McGuireWoQds Ll:..PJ One James Center, 901 Bast Cary Street,
Richmond, Vi~ginia 23219-4030; Lo~is R. Mon.oell, E8quire,
Edwa~d L. Pstrini, Esquire, and Robert M. Gillespie, Esquire,
Chr1stian & Barton, L.L.P., 909 East Main Street, Suite ~200,
Riohmond., Virginia 23219-309S.~ John I:'. Dudley. Benior ASai:u:ant.
Attorney General, Division of Consumer Counsel, Office of
.
Attorney Gener~l. 900 Bast Main Street, Second Floor, RiChmond,
Virginia 23219} and the Co~ssion'8 Divisions of Energy
Regulation, Public Utility AQcOunting. and Economies and
Finance.
JI
151
I
I ~
.
P. 020
J
.~
J
J
J
j
1
)
~
~
~
~
c
.
~
~
i'
~
:.
.~
ORDINANCE NO. OO.A(1)
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE VIRGINIA GOVERNMENTAL ELECTRICITY
PURCHASING ASSOCIATION JOINT POWERS ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT; and
PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF TIllS ORDINANCE.
WHEREAS, the VMLN ACo Virginia Power Steering Committee (the "Committee"),
composed of representatives of the County of Albemarle and other political subdivisions and
municipalities of the Commonwealth, has for over several decades negotiated on behalf of such
governmental units their purchase of electricity supply from Virginia Power as a sole source
provider; and
WHEREAS, Section 15.2-1300, et seq. of the Virginia Code (the "Joint Powers Act")
authorizes political subdivisions to exercise jointly powers they otherwise are authorized to
exercise independently, under the terms and conditions set forth in the Joint Powers Act; and
WHEREAS, the Electric Utility Restructuring Act (the "EUR Act") further authorizes
municipalities and other political subdivisions in the Commonwealth to aggregate. their
electricity supply requirements for the purpose of their joint purchase of such requirements :from
licensed suppliers, and the EUR Act provides that such aggregation shall not require licensure;
and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Public Procurement Act (the "Procurement Act") exempts
:from its competitive sealed bidding and competitive negotiation requirements (the
"Requirements") the joint procurement by public bodies, utilizing competitive principles, of
electricity supply purchased through member associations under the conditions set forth in the
Procurement Act; and
WHEREAS, the Committee bas voted unanimously to fund an effort to aggregate local
governmental purchases of up to approximately 117,000,000 kWh of annual electricity supply
(the "Supply") from competitive licensed suppliers during a pilot period commencing no earlier
than January 1, 2001, and extending through no later than December 31, 2002 (the ''Pilot
Period"); and
WHEREAS, the Committee recommends (i) the aggregation and joint procurement of
the Supply as provided in the form of the Joint Powers Association Agreement, a copy of which
is attached to and made a part of this Ordinance (the "Joint Powers Agreement'); (ii) that one or
more requests for proposals ("RFP") be issued requesting licensed suppliers (the "Proposers") to
submit proposals (the "Proposals") to furnish the Supply to the interval accounts (the
"Accounts") selected by the Proposers :from among approximately 200 interval accounts of the
municipalities and other political subdivisions that presently purchase electricity supply :from
Virginia Power; (ill) that for the Accounts selected, approximately 30% of the kWh shall be for
schools on Virginia Power's Rate Schedules 100 and 110 and approximately 70% of the kWh
shall be for non-schools on its Rate Schedule 130; and (iv) that a contract or contracts for the
furnishing of the Supply be awarded to the Proposer (or Proposers) by considering which
Proposals best (i) meet the requirements and conditions of the RFP; (ii) offer the greatest dollar
1
savings for the aggregated group as a whole; and (iii) offer a price for each Account selected that
is projected to be lower than the projected price that would otherwise obtain applying the
Virginia Power supply rate under which the Account would otherwise be served; and
WHEREAS, the Committee has agreed to provide funds from its operating budget in an
amount not to exceed $40,000 to pay the fees and expenses of its counsel, Christian & Barton,
L.L.P., and its utility consultant, the Columbia Group, to prepare the documents necessary for the
aggregation, the RFP process, the evaluation of the Proposals, and the award and execution of
the contract or contracts on behalf of the municipalities and political subdivisions owning the
Accounts for which the Supply will be furnished; and
WHEREAS, the Committee recommends that the municipalities and political
subdivisions participating in the aggregation process agree to contribute back to the Committee's
budget up to 25% of the estimated savings projected to be realized with respect to such of their
Accounts, if any, for which the Supply is to be furnished during the Pilot Period, provided that
the aggregate of such contributions back to the Committee shall not exceed $40,000; and
WHEREAS, the Committee recommends that the aggregation and procurement of the
Supply for the Pilot Period be effectuated as provided in the Joint Powers Agreement utilizing
competitive principles pursuant to an exemption from the Requirements; and
WHEREAS, the procurement of the Supply through the Joint Powers Agreement is
structured such that the projected costs of the electrical energy requirements of the County of
Albemarle can only be less than such costs would otherwise be under otherwise applicable rates,
and it has heretofore been determined on behalf of the County of Albemarle that competitive
sealed bidding and competitive negotiations by the County of Albemarle for such of the Supply
as may be applicable to any of its Accounts are not fiscally advantageous to the public; and
WHEREAS, it appearing to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle that
the joint procurement of the Supply pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement is otherwise in the
best interests of the County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Albemarle, Virginia pursuant to Virginia Code Section 15.2-1300, et ~., as follows:
Section 1. The aggregation and joint procurement of the Supply during the Pilot
Period pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement is hereby approved.
Section 2. The Joint Powers Agreement and the performance of the terms and
conditions thereof on behalf of the County of Albemarle are hereby authorized and approved.
Section 3. The County Executive is hereby authorized and directed to execute and
deliver the Joint Powers Agreement on behalf of the County of Albemarle in substantially the
form presented to this meeting.
2
Section 4. The return to the Committee of up to 25% of any savings projected to be
realized by the County of Albemarle on any of its Accounts, as provided in and subject to the
overall limitation set forth in the Joint Powers Agreement, is hereby authorized and approved.
Section 5. The payment obligatio~ of the County of Al~enwle purs~t to the
provisions hereof and the Joint Powers Agreement shall be subject to annual appropriation of
requisite funds therefor by the Board of Supervisors.
This Ordinance shall take erreet immediately.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an
Ordinance duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, by a vote of
five to~, as recorded below, at a regular meeting held on November 8. 2000.
t!d?t;~~
Clerk, Board of County Supe' . sors . U
Mr. Bowennan
Mr. Dorrier
Ms. Humphris
Mr. Martin
Mr. Perkins
Ms. Thomas
Aye Nay
Absent
J....
J....
J....
--"!:L
--"!:L
3
LARRYW. DAVIS
COUNTY ATTORNEY
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Attorney
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
MARK A. TRANK
DEPury COUNTY ATTORNEY
PHONE (804) 972-4067
FAX (804) 972-4068
GREG KAMPTNER
KIMBERLY E. WOLOD
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEYS
November 9, 2000
Sheila Martin,. Legal Assistant
Christian & Barton, LLP
909 E. Main Street, Suite 1200
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Re: Virginia Governmental Electricity Purchasing Association
Joint Powers Association Agreement
Dear Sheila:
Please find enclosed the original Agreement, referenced above, which has been signed by
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., the County Executive of Albemarle County.
Thank you for your assistance. Please call me if you have any questions or need anything
further.
Sincerely yours,
\~
Marsha A. Davis
Legal Services Assistant
Imd
Enclosure
'1
VIRGINIA GOVERNMENTAL ELECTRICITY PURCHASING ASSOCIATION
JOINT POWERS ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), made and entered into as of the 9th day of
November, 2000, by and among the local governments and other political subdivisions of
the Commonwealth of Virginia which are signatories hereto and more particularly identified on
Schedule B hereto (each a "Member" and, collectively, the "Members").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Members are each authorized by lawto acquire electric utility services
as necessary or appropriate for the operation of their respective public facilities; and
WHEREAS, Virginia Code ~15.2-1300 (the "Code") provides that any power, privilege
or authority exercised or capable of being exercised by a political subdivision of the Common-
wealth of Virginia may be exercised and enjoyed jointly with any other political subdivision of
the Commonwealth having a similar power, privilege or authority except where express statutory
procedure is otherwise provided for the joint enterprise; and
WHEREAS, the Code authorizes two or more political subdivisions to enter into
agreements with one another for such joint action and to appropriate funds and sell, lease, give or
otherwise supply such property, personnel or services therefor as may be within their legal power
to furnish; and
WHEREAS, the Members, pursuant to the authority granted in the Code, desire to create
ajoint powers association (the "Association") and associate as members hereunder with the
assistance of the Consultant and Counsel (identified below) for the purposes, among other things,
- 3 -
Schedules 100 and no and approximately 70% of the 117,000,000 kWh will be allocated to
non-schools on Virginia Power Rate Schedule 130; and
WHEREAS, the Committee has further recommended that the Virginia Power Localities
whose electricity accounts are included within the Member Accounts form a membership
association pursuant to the authority granted to localities under the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Members consist of ~l or a portion of the Virginia Power Localities
whose electricity accounts are included within the Member Accounts; and
WHEREAS, the Members desire to use an RFP process that will permitthem during all
or any portion of the Pilot Period to aggregate their purchases of the Supply from one or more
~uppliers using competitive principles; and
WHEREAS, the Members desire the continued assistance of the Committee, the -
Consultant and Counsel in connection with the matters to be undertaken by the Association.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the undertakings hereinafter
stated, the Members agree as follows:
1. Name. The undertaking of the Members hereunder shall be named and
designated as. the Virginia Governmental Electricity Purchasing Association (hereinafter the
"Association").
2. Term of the Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective for the period
commencing on the date hereof (with each Member to adopt the Agreement on or after such
commencement date) and shall terminate upon the earlier.' of (a) completion of the RFP process
and, as applicable, the completion of the Pilot Program and any matters necessary to wind up the
administration of the Pilot Program, or (b) a vote by 75% of the members of the Board (as
-4-
defined below in this Agreement) to turn over the administration of the Pilot Program to a
successor association.
3. Purpose of the Agreement. The Members enter into this Agreementfor the
purpose of acting jointly to promote their interests and welfare and to promote the interest and
welfare of, and develop close relationships with, similar public bodies. This promotion and
development shall consist of the following actions undertaken by the Association as the agent for
the Members: (a) issuance of one or more RFPs, (b) evaluation of responses to the RFP,
(c) award of one or more contracts to one or more Suppliers, if any, whose responses are selected
pursuant to the evaluation of such responses in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, and
(d) the administration of any Pilot Program Contracts that may be awarded pursuant to the RFP.
All such actions by the Association shall be done with the advice and consultation of the .
Consultant and Counsel and approved by the Board.
4. Purchase of the SUDDlv.
(a) After evaluating any responses submitted by Suppliers to the RFP, the. Board shall
determine what contracts, if any, should be awarded for the purchase of the Supply for the
Accounts for the Pilot Period. The purchase of the Supply shall be made pursuant to the
exemption from competitive sealed bidding and competitive negotiation as set forth in Virginia
Code Section 11-45.G ofthe Virginia Public Procurement Act (the "Act") using competitive
principles, and, to the extent applicable, other relevant provisions of the Act. Each Member
agrees, subject to annual appropriation, to purchase its respective share of the Supply for its
Accounts selected by the successful Supplier(s) from among the Member Accounts and to pay
therefor the rate for such Accounts negotiated in the procurement process for the Supply, subject
to the provisions of subsection (b) of this Section 4. No member shall be liable or responsible
- 5 -
for any payments owed the successful Supplier(s) under any contract(s) for any portion of the
Supply by any other .Member with respect to the Account of any such other Member.
(b) The Board shall determine which one or more of the responses to the RFP,
if any, (i) best meets the requirements and conditions of the RFP, (ii) offers the greatest projected
savings, in aggregate, for all or some portion of the Supply, (iii) meets the Specifications and
(iv) proposes a price for each Account to be served under any Pilot Program Contract that is
projected to be lower than the projected price that would otherwise pertain when applying the
Virginia Power supply rate under which the Account would otherwise be serVed (the "Virginia
Power Rate").
(c) The Pilot Program Contracts awarded hereunder by the Association for the
purchase of the Supply shall be executed by the Chairman or the Vice Chairman bfthe
Association on behalf of the Members owning the Accounts to be served under the Pilot Program
Contracts.
(d) The Association shall cause to be communicated to other municipalities and
political subdivisions in the Commonwealth the advantages of this Agreement with a view to
furthering their economic interests in the aggregation and procurement of electricity services on
a competitive basis.
5. Governance.
(a) The Board. The Association shall be governed by a Board (the "Board")
that shall initially cqnsist of the primary representatives df the Members listed on Schedule B
hereto. The Members listed on Schedule B may also appoint a secondary representative who
may attend all meetings of the Board, but who shall not have voting privileges unless the primary
representative of the Member shall be absent. The Board shall have power to decide all matters
- 6 -
relating to the Association's activities and operations, subject to the provisions set forth herein.
Whenever any Member withdraws from the Association in accordance with this Agreement, that
Member shall no longer have any representation on the Board.
(b) Meeting of the Board. The Board shall meet at such times and places
within the Commonwealth of Virginia as shall be designated by the Chairman. Three working
days' notice by fax or E-mail shall be given in advance of all Board meetings.
(c) Officers ofthe Board. Paul Proto is hereby designated as Chairman of the
Board and Steve Sinclair is hereby designated asits Vice Chairman, to serveimtil the earlier of
(a) the termination of the Association or (b) the submission of such officer's 'resignation or his
removal and the election of a successor by the Board. The Chairman shall preside at all meetings
of the Board, and in his absence, the Vice Chairman shall preside. Vacancies in such offices
may be filled by the. Board at any meeting. . Steve Craig of the VML, or its designee, shall serve
as the Board's secretary, but without vote.
(d) Quorum. Twenty-five percent of the members of the Board shall
constitute a quorum for any Board meeting.
( e) Actions by the Board. All matters for action by the Board may be adopted
upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the Members present and voting.
(f) Consultant and Counsel. The Columbia Group is hereby initially
designated as Consultant to the Association and Christian & Barton, L.L.P., is hereby initially
designated as Counsel to the Association.
6. Bude:et of the Association.
(a) There is hereby established a budget of $40,000 for the RFP process and the
selection of and contracting with the successful Supplier, based upon an estimate therefor of
- 7-
$20,000 for the Consultant and $20,000 for Counsel, including fees and expenses. The budget
shall be funded from amounts set aside by the Committee from its current operating budget.
(b) Each of the Members owning any of the Accounts shall, subject to annual
appropriation, contribute back to the Committee by December 31,2001, for credit to the
Committee's current operating budget an amount of up to 25% of such Member's savings
projected to be realized from purchasing its respective share of the Supply for its Accounts
compared to the amount that otherwise would be projected to be paid by applying the Virginia
Power Rate for such Accounts; provided, that the aggregate of such contributions back to the
Committee shall not exceed $40,000 total for all members. Such projected savings and
contributions back to the Committee shall be reasonably determined by the Consultant following
the award of the contract or contracts for the Supply and a written report thereof promptly
delivered by the Consultant to the Committee and to each of the Members. Should the projected.
aggregate savings for all the Accounts exceed $160,000 (.25 x $160,000 = $40,000), the
percentage of each Member's contribution back shall be adjusted by the Consultant in making its
determinations by multiplying .25 by a fraction, the numerator of which shall be 160,000 and the
denominator of which shall be the sum of the projected savings for all the Accounts. No
Member shall be required to pay any portion of any contribution back assessed to, but unpaid by,
any other Member.
(c) The Association shall not create or incur any liability for the Members, jointly or
severally, other than (i) the costs incurred by any Membel- in paying for any Accounts of the
Member that are served under any Pilot Program Contracts and (ii) the reimbursement owed to
the Committee pursuant to subsection (b) above.
- 8 -
."
7. Withdrawal of Members. A Member may withdraw from the Association
effective upon the earlier of (a) notice from the Association that no Pilot Program Contract will
serve any of the Member's Member Accounts, or (b) notice from the Association that the term of
all Pilot Program Contracts serVing any of the Member's Member Accounts has expired and the
Member has reimbursed the Committee for any amounts owed under Section 6(b) of this
Agreement.
8. Notices. Unless otherwise provided for herein, notices, approvals, requests,
consents and other communications under this Agreement shall be in writing imd shall be
deemed to have been given when delivered in person, by fax or byE-mail or mailed by first
class, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the primary representatives of
the Members at the addresses shown on Schedule B. The Members may designate by notice
given hereunder any further or different addressees or addresses to which subsequent
communications under this Agreement shall be sent.
9. Execution ofMultinle Ori~inals. This Agreement may be executed by the
Members in multiple original counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and
all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument.
WITNESS the following signatures, effective as of the date first above written.
By:
Title:
County ~xecutive
#530251.10
-9-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Public Hearing to Approve by Ordinance an Agreement
for a Pilot Program for the Joint Aggregation and
Procurement of Electrical Energy.
AGENDA DATE:
November 8, 2000
ITEM NUMBER:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Request adoption and approval of an ordinance and
agreement necessary to include the County in the pool of
localities participating in a pilot program for the
aggregation and procurement of electrical energy
through VML and VACo.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
7
STAFF CONTACTCS):
Messrs. Tucker, Davis, Breeden, Trank
DISCUSSION:
The referenced Pilot Program involves a competitive procurement of electrical energy developed by a steering committee
composed of representatives from the Virginia Municipal League, Virginia Association of Counties and Virginia Power. The
short-term goal of the program is to obtain the greatest savings for the group (approximately 200) of participating localities,
school boards, and authorities. The Albemarle County School Board and the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority are also
eligible for inclusion in this pilot program. The steering committee hopes that the program will test the efficiency and cost
savings potentials that may be realized in the future with even larger aggregations of accounts for electrical energy.
Va. Code ~ 15.2-1300 requires that the County approve a joint powers agreement by ordinance. Both the agreement and
ordinance attached hereto have been developed by outside legal counsel (Christian & Barton, LLP) in Richmond on behalf of
the VMLN ACo steering committee.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption and approval of the proposed ordinance and agreement.
00.236
";(.(..
j; ~!
CHRISTIAN & BARTON
LL.P.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
909 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 1200 . RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219-3095
TELEPHONE (804)697-4100 . FACSIMILE (804)697-4114.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Contact Persons for Governing Bodies of Virginia Local Governments
that have Accounts Eligible for Pilot Program '
FROM:
Louis R. Monacell,Esquire
Daniel E. Rogers, II, Esquire
Chona M. Robb, Esquire
DATE:
September 6, 2000
RE:
Aggregation and Joint Procurement of Electricity Supply for Pilot Program
Q&A
1. Why should you participate in joint procurement?
You should participate in the joint procurement of electric energy to take
advantage of the savings expected to be realized through the aggregation of a
number of sizable accounts. In addition, the program is set up as a pilot to
testthe efficacy and cost savings potentials that may be realized in the future
with even larger aggregations.
2. Can you achieve similar results through your own individual resources?
It is possible, though not likely, that similar savings on smaller unaggregated
accounts could be realized.
3. Are savings guaranteed to us?
It is expected that each account selected to participate in the pilot program
will realize a savings because each supplier is required to propose a price for
each account that is less than would otherwise obtain applying the Virgil1.ia
Power rate. Actual usage may ultimately affect actual savings realized.
ot 1 ~
CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP.
Memorandum to Contact Persons
September 6, 2000
Page 2
4. What is Virginia Power's role/posture/agreement in principle?
Virginia Power has agreed in principle to allow the aggregation and
competitive procurement on an' annual basis starting as early as January 1,
2000, of up to approximately 117,000,000 kWh of electric energy on its Rate
Schedules 100, 110, and 130 that would otherwise be provided by them for
the accounts constituting the eligible pooL This 117,000,000 kWh represents
approximately 3.4% of total government annual usage of 3.5 billion kWh.
5. Is participation required?
No.
6. What do you lose by participating?
Nothing. The pilot program is set up to be "win-win" for the participants
inasm uch as each participating account is required to have a projected price
savings over that which would otherwise be applicable.
7. Is there any liability/responsibility for participating?
By executing the Joint Powers Agreement, you would agree to be bound by a
contract executed in your name resulting from the competitive procurement
of the joint supply. The payment obligation is subject to appropriation, is
limited to the term of the pilot program, ,and is limited to a projected price
that would be less than the projected price for your account otherwise
applicable under Virginia Power rates.
8. How were eligible RFP Accounts selected?
Two hundred eligible RFP Accounts on Schedules 100, 110, and 130 were
selected by the VMUVaCo Virginia Powe'r Steering Committee based upon
the recommendation of its Consultant, the Columbia Group. These 200
accounts use approximately 1 billion kWh on an annual basis, approximately
30% of which is for schools on Schedules 100 and 110 and 70% of which is for
non-schools on Schedule 130.
, .
.
CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP.
Memorandum to Contact Persons
September 6, 2000
Page 3
9. Is our account selection/participation guaranteed?
No. Only approximately 3.4% of the usage of local governments can
participate pursuant to Virginia Power's limitation. The VMUVaCo Virginia
Power Steering Committee recommended that the determination of the
actual accounts selected to participate in the pilot to constitute this
117,000,000 kWh program be chosen by the competitive licensed suppliers
participating in the RFP process in order to obtain the most' attractive pricing
proposals.
10. Will joint procurement be undertaken pursuant to competitive sealed
bidding/competitive negotiation requirements of Public Procurement Act?
It is expected that the RFP process will be exempt from the competitive
sealed bidding/competitive negotiation requirements of the Public
Procurement Act pursuant to the exemption afforded by Section 11-45.G of
the Act. The Joint Powers Agreement establishes a membership association
to conduct the joint procurement pursuant to such exemption.
11. Will competitive principles be employed in the procurement?
Yes. Competitive principles are required to be utilized pursuant to the
referenced exemption, and the RFP process being designed for the Pilot
Program embodies those principles.
2. On what basis will the winning supplier(s) be selected?
The winning supplier(s) to be selected will be the supplier(s) that
(i) otherwise. meets the requirements of the RFP, (ii) proposes a projected
price for each account that would be less than that which would obtain
applying the otherwise applicable Virginia Power rate and (iii) proposes the
greatest savings for the group as a whole,in total dollars as compared to what
would be paid to Virginia Power. In addition, the accounts selected will have
to meet the specification that approximately 30% of the usage be allocated to
schools on Schedules 100 and 110 and approximately 70% of the usage
allocated to non-schools on Schedule 130.
13. Are we authorizing the execution of a supply contract on our behalf?
Yes, within the parameters specified above.
:
'.
CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP.
Memorandum to Contact Persons
September 6, 2000
Page 4
14. For what period of time?
The contract will cover the Pilot Period which will commence no earlier than
January 1,2001, and extend through no later than December 31,2002. This
period affords flexibility in pricing options and is intended to achieve a
greater savings than could be obtained for a "fixed" one-year period.
15. For what cost?
See No.7 above.
16. Is our payment obligation subject to annual appropriation?
Yes.
17. Must we find that competitive sealed bidding and competitive negotiation are not
fiscally advantageous to the public?
Yes, in order to take advantage of the exemption from competitive sealed
bidding/competitive negotiation afforded by Section 11-45.G of the Public
Procurement Act.
18. Must we approve the Joint Powers Agreement by ordinance/resolution?
Yes. Since the Joint Powers Agreement is being undertaken pursuant to the
Joint Powers Act, the Agreement must be approved by ordinance by counties,
cities and towns and by resolution by other political subdivisions.
19. Who are "Members?"
Members are the governmental units sho~n on the schedule to the JPA.
Their authorized representatives will sign the JPA on their behalf. The
Members are those owning the 200 eligible accounts selected by the
consultant.
20. How were Board members selected?
Board members were selected from among those having representatives on
the VMUVaCo Virginia Power Steering Committee who also owned accounts
CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP.
Memorandum to Contact Persons
September 6, 2000
Page 5
eligible for the RFP process. Should other Members desire to be included on
the Board, please let us know and you will be included.
21. Who makes decisions on behalf of the Association?
The Board, with the advice and consultation of the Consultant, the Columbia
Group; Counsel, Christian & Barton, L.L.P.; and the officers of the
Association, Messrs. Paul Proto (Henrico County) and Steve Sinclair (Fairfax
County), who have in-depth knowledge and involvement with the proposed
Pilot Program. Earlier consideration was given to an executive committee,
but following the first round of comments, it was determined not to utilize
that approach.
22. How were officers selected?
It was thought that Messrs. Proto and Sinclair would be excellent as
Chairman and Vice-chairman in light of theirexperience and involvement.
23. Must Board members stay on if their accounts are not selected?
Board members may withdraw as such iftheir accounts are not selected or at
such time as their selected accounts, if any, are no longer being served under
the program.
24. How are costs of the undertaking being defrayed?
The VMLNaCo Virginia Power Steering Committee has committed to provide
$40,000 from its existing budget to defray the expenses ofthe RFP process.
$20,000 is estimated for Counsel and $20,000 estimated for the Consultant,
including fees and expenses. These funds are already earmarked and further
assessment of Members is not contemplated, subject to #25 below.
25. Are we responsible for any costs?
The Joint Powers Agreement provides for a contribution back, subject to
annual appropriation, to the Steering Committee's budget of up to 25% of the
projected savings on each selected account, with the aggregate of all such
contributions back not to exceed $40,000. The reimbursement obligation is
based on projected savings rather than actual savings realized, because
. actual usage may cause results to vary.
CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP.
Memorandum to Contact Persons
September 6, 2000
Page 6
26. How is reimbursement obligation, if any, calculated?
See No, 25 above. The projected savings and resultant contributions back to
the Steering Committee's 'budget will be reasonably calculated and
determined by the Consultant following the award of the contract(s) for the
supply. Members will be notified of their reimbursement obligation at that
time by the Consultant with payment to be made by December 31, 2001.
27. Will the Association own property or maintain bank accounts?
No. Since this is a pilot program and expenses are being handled through the
Steering Committee, no property or bank accounts will be necessary. The
Association thus will terminate upon conclusion of the term of the Agreement
without the need for any further "dissolution" proceediIigs.
28. Can the Association expand its authority on its own?
No. The authority of the Association is established by the Agreement of the
participating Members. Any expansion would require the agreement of all
Members. The provision in the JP A concerning termination of the JPA upon a
transfer to a successor association of the program administration requires a 75%
vote of the members of the Board and contemplates a possible later phase of joint
procurement, should the Members decide to proceed beyond the Pilot Program.
29. By when are we requested to comment on the Program documents?
September 14, 2000.
30. To whom should our comments be directed?
Daniel E. Rogers, II, Esquire
Christian & Barton, L.L.P.
909 East Main Street, Suite 1200
Richmond, Virginia, 23219-3095
Telephone - (804)697-4105
Fax - (804)697-4112 or (804)697-6105
E-mail ~drogers@cblaw.com
Louis R. Monacell, Esquire
"
Christian & Barton, L.L.P.
909 East Main Street, Suite 1200
Richmond, Virginia, 23219-3095
Telephone - (804)697-4120
Fax - (804)697-4112 or (804)697-6120
E-mail ~lmonacell@cblaw.com
CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP.
Memorandum to Contact Persons
September 6, 2000
Page 7
Chona M.. Robb, Esquire
Christian & Barton, L.L.P.
909 East Main Street, Suite 1200
Richmond, Virginia, 23219-3095
Telephone - (804)697-4140
Fax - (804)697-4112 or (804)697-6140
E-mail-crobb@cblaw..com
31. What is the date by which our participation approval is requested?
October 20, 2000. .
32. When is RFP expected to be issued?
October 23, 2000.
33. When is contract for supply expected to be awarded?
December 4, 2000.
#5a.32G9.3
Balloon test photograph
Photosimulation
of Wooden Monopole
using the balloon test photograph at left
Top of balloon at 7 feet above the tallest tree
within 25 feet of the center of the pole
(90 feet)
monopole at 7 feet above the top of the tallest tree
within 25 feet of the centerline of the pole
(90 feet)
View from Route 53 traveling east toward Palmyra
'\.
~
.
j
.1
Balloon test photograph
Photo simulation
of Wooden Monopole
using the balloon test photograph at left
Top of balloon at 3 feet above the tallest tree
within 25 feet of the center of the pole
(86 feet)
View from Route 53 traveling east toward
Palmyra
monopole at 3 feet above the top of the tallest tree
within 25 feet of the centerline of the pole
(86 feet)
~
S1> ()()~45 S-weene'i
(CtO~ co1Dtl1unicatiOUS~
\ cr g, to lease area
~ie"W 01 e,usUulb access toad ea 1U
~
,.-... -.$
SP 00-45 Sweeney
(Crown Communications)
View of Triton lease area
"-
SP 00-45 Sweeney
(Crown Communications)
Top of balloon at 86 feet
View from adjacent property driveway looking east
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
40 1 McIntire Road. Room 2 i 8
Charlottesville. Virginia 22902-4591'\
(804) 296 - 5823
Fax (804) 972 - 4012
October 30, 2000
Valerie W. Long
McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, LLP
POBox 1288
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: SP-2000-45 Sweeney (Triton PCS CVR 362); Tax Map 94, Parcel 17
Dear Ms. Long:
At the Albemarle County Planning Commission meeting on October 17, 2000, a motion to approve the
above-noted petition failed by a tie vote. Therefore, by the Commission's Rules of Procedure, this
petition is not recommended to the Board of Supervisors for approval.
Plea'se be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive
public comment at their meeting on November 8, 2000. Any new or additional information regarding your
application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your
scheduled hearing date.
The Commission also took the following actions:
. Approved, by a vote of 5-2, a site plan waiver, subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval of an erosion and sediment control plan prior to the issuance of a building permit.
2. Provision of one parking space.
3. A site plan application shall be required if activity on slopes of 25% or grater is proposed.
4. Staff review and approval to ensure that all conditions of the special use permit are reflected in
the final revisions to the construction drawings, prior to issuance of a building permit.
. Approved, by a vote of 5-2, a setback waiver, subject to the following condition:
1. The pole shall not be constructed closer than 53.57 feet from the nearest property line. as shown
on the plan titled Carroll Creek/Crown Communications.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the above-noted action, please do not hesitate to
contaCt me.
Sincerely,
1tI~
JM/jcf
Cc:
Ella Carey
Jack Kelsey
Amelia McCulley
Bob Ball
r"'\
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
Joan D. McDowell
October 17, 2000
November 8, 2000
CORRECTED REPORT
SP 00-45 Sweeney (Crown Communications)
UPDATE: On September 9,2000, the Commission voted to defer
consideration of SP 00-45 to the October 17th public hearing. The deferral
was requested by the applicant in order to include a request in the
application for a setback waiver, und~r Section 4.10.3.1 of the Zoning
Ordinance. The setback waiver is addressed on page eight, number 5, of this
report.
~
In addition to the review of the setback waiver, a condition of approval for
the site plan waiver has been added to the recommendation. The condition
would require that "all conditions of the special use permit are reflected in
the final revisions of the construction drawings, prior to issuance of a
building permit." It has been included to assure that the final plan mirrors
the conditions of approval, and is consistent with recent applications.
Applicant's Proposal:
The applicant, Crown Communications, has proposed to lease a 14,747
square foot portion of a 519 .11S-acre parcel. A 200 square foot (10' X 20')
portion of the Crown Communications lease area would then be sub-leased
to Triton PCS.
Triton has proposed to construct a 90-foot high wooden pole and ground
equipment to serve the communication facility. The pole would have flush
mounted antennas and a grounding rod attached to the top. The trees used to
determine the requested height are contained within the larger lease area.
Access to the site would be provided by a 12-foot wide extension to an
existing gravel/dirt road.
Petition: The applicant has requested a special use permit to allow a
communication facility, including a 90' high wood pole, flush mounted
antenna, and ground equipment on a 14,747 square foot lease area of a
SP 00-45
Revised
1
519.118 acre parcel, in accordance with Section 10.2.2.6 of the Zoning
Ordinance which allows for micro-wave and radio-wave transmission and
relay poles.
/---"",
In additiQn, the applicant has requested a waiver from the setback
requirements set forth in Section 4.10.3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The property, described as Tax Map 94 Parcel 17, is located in the
Scottsville Magisterial District at 2670 Thomas Jefferson Parkway (SR#53)
east of SR # 729. The property is zoned RA Rural Area District (RA) and is
within an Entrance Corridor Overlay Zone (EC). Although unrelated to this
application, a portion of the parcel adjacent to the Rivanna River is within a
Natural Resource Extraction Overlay District (NR). The Comprehensive
Plan designation for this parcel is Rural Area 4.
Character of the Area:
The proposed location for the facility is on a rise within a wooded parcel off
a partially improved lane. The lane is accessed from State Route 53. The
balloon test conducted on September 1, 2000, revealed that the pole would
be visible for approximately one-tenth of a mile for eastbound traffic on
State Route 53.
~,
Virginia Power lines transect the parcel a few feet from the proposed pole.
The adjacent open farmland is within sight of the lease area and the
proposed pole would be visible from the adjacent property, as revealed by
the balloon test.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of Section
31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance and recommends conditional approval.
Planning and Zoning History:
The following application has been approved on this subj ect property:
ARB- P(BP)-2000-14
The conditions of approval are attached, as reference. (Attachment C)
/~,
SP 00-45
Revised
2
-.~.
Comprehensive Plan:
The site is located in the Rural Area land use designation of the
Comprehensive Plan.
The current use is residential, agricultural, and forest. The impact of this
communication facility on resources identified in the Open Space Plan
would be mitigated, due to the restrictions on height, the preservation of
trees, and the limited access.
STAFF COMMENT:
In the following sections, Staff will address the issues of this request:
1.
Provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance are
discussed below:
,-...\
The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right
to issue all special use permits permitted hereunder. Special
use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be
issues upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that. such use
will not be of substantial detriment to adiacent property.
Balloon tests showed that at the proposed height for the pole, 90 feet, the
pole would be visible from the adjacent property and from the road. The
balloon was lowered to 83 feet, but it was still highly visible above the trees
and appeared significantly higher than the tallest tree. A survey provided by
the applicant indicated that the highest tree within 25 feet of the proposed
pole is an ~83 foot high oak. The oak is located between the proposed pole
site andthe State Route 53. Balloon test photographs ~.Yere taken ~yyith the
tallest tree in front of the pole. Balloon tests were taken from Route 53,
west of the proposed pole location.
""""
To achieve an accurate analysis by also considering elevations, at staffs
request, the applicant provide heights measured Above Sea Level. The top
of the tallest tree 'was measured at 420 feet ASL. The proposed pole has
been requested at a height of 420.8 ASL.
SP 00-45
Revised
3
~
The applicant has advised that "the surveyors have a tremendously difficult
time accurately measuring the heights of the trees, especially in densely
wooded areas." this difficulty may be the reason why the balloon, when
flown at what was believed to be three feet above the tree, was so visible and
the difference between the heights as measured in feet and when measured
Above Sea Level.
Conditions of approval are recommended that would require certification of
the tree height, as well as certification of the pole height.
The applicant has advised that the location of the proposed site would
provide the coverage needed for cars traveling on State Route 53 and that
alternative sites would not provide the needed coverage. Therefore, as the
proposed facilities site is at a higher elevation than the roadway, a condition
of approval is offered that would reduce the height of the wooden pole to no
more than three feet above the highest tree. The recommended height would
not include the two-foot high grounding rod.
It should be understood that, as the trees grow, the height of the pole might
need to be extended also, in order to achieve desired coverage. This
condition would allow the extension, without compromising the goal for
limited visibility, as maximum pole height would be indirect relationship
with the tree heights.
~.
Electricity would be accessed from the adjacent Virginia Power lines. The
applicant has advised that the lines would be installed underground.
that the character of the district will not be changed thereby.
Although the site can be viewed from State Route 53, with the design and
the recommended materials, the restricted height, and the limited clearing
required to accommodate the facility, the proposed facility would have
minimal impact on the character of the district.
The application is subject to review by the Architectural Review Board, as
State Route 53 is an Entrance Corridor. The Board has approved a
Certificate of Appropriateness with conditions. (Attachment C)
.~
SP 00-45
Revised
4
~
and that such use will be in harmony with'the purpose and intent of
this ordinance.
The purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance, as stated in Sections 1.4,
1.5, and 1.6, with particular reference to Sections 1.4, 1.4.4, and 1.5. All of
these provisions address, in one form or another, the provision of public
services. The use of mobile telephones clearly provides a public service, as
evidenced by the expanded and rapid increase in this technology. Section
1.4.3 states as intent of the Ordinance, "To facilitate the creation of a
convenient, attractive and harmonious community." The provision of the
facility would increase the availability and convenience for users of wireless
phone technology.
The limited visual impact of the facility does not conflict with the
attractiveness of the community. Therefore, this request complies with
Section 31.2.4.1 of the Ordinance.
with the uses permitted by right in the district.
,~
The proposed pole would not restrict the current uses, or by right uses on any
other property. The proposed conditions would limit tree clearing on this
site in order to reduce any visual impacts of this pole from adjacent
properties and access to the site would be limited. The applicant has advised
that a monthly maintenance visit is customary. Also, as the site would not
have any lighting, visual impacts during nighttime would not result from this
use.
with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance.
Section 5.1.12 of the Ordinance contains regulations governing pole
facilities and appropriate conditions are proposed to ensure compliance with
this provision of the Ordinance.
and with the public health. safety and general welfare.
,.......,
The provisions of increased wireless communication facilities may be
considered consistent with the public health, safety and general welfare by
providing increased communication services in the event of emergencies and
by increasing overall general communication services. The
Telecommunications Act of 1996 addresses issues of environmental effects
SP 00-45
Revised
5
with the following language: ''No state or local government or
instrumentality thereof my regulate the placement, construction, and
modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the
environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such
facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such
emissions." In order to operate this facility, the applicant is required to meet
the Federal Communication Commission guidelines for radio frequency
emissions. This requirement will adequately protect the public health and
safety .
/~
2. Section 704(a)(7)(b)(I)(II) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996:
The regulation of the placement. construction and modification of
personal wireless facilities by any state or local government or
instrumentality thereof shall not prohibit or have the effect of
prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services.
Neither the Comprehensive Plan nor the Zoning Ordinance prohibits the
provision of personal wireless service. The purpose of this facility would be
to provide additional service along State Route 53, with the intent to'
eventually provide seamless service. However, the denial of this application
would not prohibit the personal wireless services in this area.
/-..,,,
3. County of Albemarle Personal Wireless Service Draft Facilities
Policy
Although, as of the writing of this staff report, the Board of Supervisors has
not adopted the Wireless Facilities Policy, the wireless providers are
voluntarily using the Policy as a guiding instrument. In concert with the
Policy, the proposed communication facility would implement the following
summarized guidelines:
a Limited visibility: if constructed at the recommended height of three
feet above the highest tree within 25 feet, the proposed pole would be
located at a height that would limit the visibility from adjoining
properties, as well as from nearby State Route 53.
The pole would be a natural dark brown wooden structure and the
equipment cabinets also would be painted dark brown, to blend with
its surrounding environment. The flush mounted directional antennas
~.
SP 00-45
Revised
6
~
.~\
b.
c.
d.
wo.uld be designed to. be as inco.nspicuous as po.ssible, and wo.uld also.
be painted a dark brawn co.lo.r to. match the wo.o.den pale. No.
permanent lighting wo.uld be used an the site o.r the pale.
Pro.tectio.n o.fridgeto.ps and ridgelines: The pro.po.sed site is lo.cated at
a higher elevatio.n than the ro.ad and the adjacent pro.perties. Therefo.re,
the reco.mmended restricted height o.f 3 feet abo.ve the highest tree
within 25 feet is reco.mmended to. mitigate visual impacts o.fthe
structure.
Utilize existing structure: the applicant has advised that no. existing
facility within this area wo.uld permit the additio.nal equipment due to.
height o.r structure; therefo.re, co.llo.catio.n an ano.ther facility is no.t
feasible, acco.rding to. the applicant.
Appro.priateness in any zo.ning district: the size o.fthe pale wo.uld be
limited by the tree heights surro.unding the facility. The unlighted site
and the natural, earthen co.lo.rs used an the equipment, the antennas,
and the limited height wo.uld be as uno.btrusive as po.ssible.
e. Gro.und based equipment in keeping with the area's character: the
pro.po.sed equipment cabinets wo.uld be co.nsistent in size with the
existing equipment cabinets. The dark brawn co.lo.r wo.uld aidin
blending the cabinets into. the surro.unding enviro.nment.
f. Limited visibility o.fthe antennas: the brawn painted antennas wo.uld
be appro.ximately 44.7 inches lang, 6.3 inches wide, and 2 inches
deep. The distance between the o.utside face o.f the pale to. the inside
face o.fthe antennas wo.uld no.t exceed 12 inches.
.1"""".
SP 00-45
Revised
The applicant, Cro.wn Co.mmunicatio.ns, has leased over 14,000 square
feet and has subleased a 200 square fo.o.t po.rtio.n o.f their lease area to.
Trito.n Co.mmunicatio.ns. Cro.wn also. intends to. sublease to. ather
pro.viders, given the o.ppo.rtunity in the future. The future pro.viders
wo.uld be required to. submit separate special use permit applicatio.ns.
The trees lo.cated within the Cro.wn lease area have been used as
justificatio.n far the Trito.n pale height. A co.nditio.n o.f appro.val with
this applicatio.n wo.uld limit tree cutting within 200 feet within the
subject pro.perty; therefo.re, the trees within the lease site co.uld no.t be
7
removed. Crown and Triton have been advised of these restrictions
and they are aware that any additional facilities would require a
special use permit. In addition, any changes in this application would
require an amendment to the special use permit.
.~
4. Waiver of a site plan in accord with the provisions of Section
32.2.2 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Commission may waive the drawing of a site plan, if requiring a site
plan would not forward the purpose of the Ordinance or otherwise serve the
public interest. Generally, the Site Review Committee has endorsed the use
of site plan waivers for the establishment of telecommunication facilities.
This general endorsement has been based on the relatively small area
impacted by the proposed use and the ability to obtain the required
information through an erosion and sediment control plan and the building
permits. Staff is able to support the request for a site plan waiver as the
information submitted by the applicant generally meets the requirements for
a site plan.
Based on the examination this application has received and will receive
during the review processes, staff is unable to identify any purpose that
would be served by requiring the submission of a separate site plan
application.
.~
Therefore, staff recommends approval of a full site plan waiver, subject to
the following conditions:
1. Approval of an erosion and sediment control plan prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
2. Provision of one parking space.
3. A site plan application shall be required if activity on slopes of
25% or greater is proposed.
4. Staff review and approval to ensure that all conditions of the
special use permit are reflected in the final revisions of the
construction drawings, prior to issuance of a building permit.
5.
Waiver of a required setback, in accord with provisions set forth
in Section 4.10.3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
~,
SP 00-45
Revised
8
~.
The proposed pole is 53.57 feet from the nearest property line.
Section 4.10.3.1 a setback of one foot for every foot of height for a
tower. The applicant has requested that the tower be located closer to
the propertY, in order to be closer to the access road. As the base of
the tower would not be visible from the adjoining property, the tower
height is restricted, and no buildings are located within the fall zone of
the tower, staff can support the setback waiver, subject to the '
following condition:
. The pole shall not be constructed closer than 53.57 feet from the
nearest property line, as shown on the attached plan titled Carroll
Creek/Crown Communications.
SUMMARY
. Staff has identified the following factors that are favorable to this request:
1.
The facility would provide increased wireless capacity, which may
be considered consistent with the provisions of Sections 1.4, 1.4.4,
and 1.5 of the Zoning Ordinance; .
The facility would not restrict permitted uses on the subject
property or on adjacent properties;
The design of the facility would not result in adverse visual
impacts to adjoining land or roads;
With recommended height restrictions, the visibility of the pole
would be mitigated.
,-,
2.
3.
4.
. Staff has identified the following factors that are unfavorable to this
request:
1. The site is within the Entrance Corridor District;
2. The pole could be viewed for approximately 1/ 1 0 of a mile along State
Route 53 and from adjacent properties.
. The following factor is relevant to this consideration:
There is an existing, reasonable use of this property.
SP 00-45
Revised
9
"'--.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
I. Site Plan Waiver. As a relatively small area impacted by the
proposed use and as staff will have ability to obtain the required
information through an erosion and sediment control plan and
building permits, staff is able to support the request for a site plan
waIver.
Therefore, pursuant to Section 32.2.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, staff
recommends APPROVAL of a full site plan WAIVER, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Approval of an erosion and sediment control plan prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
2. Provision of one parking space.
3. A site plan application shall be required if activity on slopes of
25 % or greater is proposed.
4. Staffreview and approval to ensure that all conditions of the
special use permit are reflected in the final revisions so the
construction drawings, prior to issuance of a building permit.
~.
II. Setback Waiver. Staff recommends APPROVAL of a setback
WAIVER, subject to the following condition of approval:
The pole shall not be constructed closer than 53.57 feet from the
nearest property line, as shown on the attached plan titled Carroll
Creek/Crown Communications.
III. Special Use Permit. While this site is located in the Rural Area of
the Comprehensive Plan, the design of the facility, the limited land
disturbance, the restriction and the existence of a road on the property
reduce the impacts such that approval would not be inconsistent with
the goal of protecting these resources.
Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of SP 00-45 subject to the
following conditions of approval:
~
/ '
SP 00-45
Revised
10
1""',
1""""\
1"""',
1.
2.
3.
SP 00-45
Revised
The top of the pole, as measured Above Sea Level (ASL), shall never
exceed three (3) feet above the top of the tallest tree within twenty five
(25) feet of the facility at or below the same base elevation as the pole,
measured Above Sea Level (ASL). No antennas or equipment, with
the exception of the grounding rod, shall be located above the top of
the pole.
The pole shall be designed, constructed and maintained as follows:
a. The pole shall be wood and dark brown in color;
b. Guy wires shall not be permitted;
c. No lighting shall be permitted on the site or on the pole, except
as provided by condition number nine (9) herein;
d. The ground equipment cabinets, antenna, and all equipment
attached to the pole shall be dark brown in color and shall be no
larger than the specifications as shown on the attached plan
entitled Crown Communications/Carroll Creek.
e. A grounding rod, not exceeding two feet above the top of the
pole, and with a width not to exceed one-inch diameter at the
base and tapering to a point, may be installed at the top of the
pole.
f. A Radio Frequency (RF) Isolator, ifrequired for the functioning
of the facility, shall be located below the top of the tallest tree,
as identified in condition number one.
g. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall
provide a statement to the Planning Department by a licensed
surveyor certifying the height of the tallest tree, as identified in
condition number one.
h. Within one month after the completion of the pole, the applicant
shall provide a statement to the Planning Department certifying
the height of the pole, measured both in feet above ground and
also measured Above Sea Level.
1. The pole can never extend above the top of the tallest tree,
except as described in condition number one of these conditions
of approval, without prior approval of an amendment to this
special use permit.
The pole shall be located as follows:
a. The pole shall be located on the site as shown on the attached
plan entitled Crown Communications/Carroll Creek.
11
b.
The proposed facility shall be located not more than 25 feet
from the existing access road.
~"
4. Antennas shall be attached to the pole only as follows:
a. Antennas shall be limited to those shown on the attached plan
entitled Crown Communications/Carroll Creek.
b. No satellite Qr microwave dishes shall be permitted on the pole.
c. Only flush mounted antennas shall be permitted. No antennas
that project out from the pole beyond the minimum required by
the support structure, shall be permitted. However, in no case
shall the antennas project out from the pole more than 12
inches.
5.
Prior to beginning construction or installation of the pole or the
equipment cabinets, or installation of access for vehicles or utilities, a
tree conservation plan, developed by a certified arborist, specifying
tree protection methods and procedures and identifying any existing
trees to be removed on the site both inside and outside the access
easement and lease area shall be submitted to the Director of Planning
and Community Development for approval. All construction or
installation associated with the pole and equipment building, including
necessary. access for construction or installation, shall be in
accordance with this tree conservation plan. Except for the tree
removal expressly authorized by the Director of Planning and
Community Development, the permittee shall not remove existing
trees within two hundred (200) feet of the pole and equipment
building. A special use permit amendment shall be required for any
future tree removal within the two hundred-foot buffer, after the
installation of the subject facility.
~.
6. The pole shall be disassembled and removed from the site within
ninety (90) days of the date its use for wireless telecommunications
purposes is discontinued.
7.
SP 00-45
Revised
The permittee shall submit a report to the Zoning Administrator one
time per year, no later than July I of that year. The report shall
identify each user of the pole and certify that the height of the pole is
in compliance with condition number one.
.~,
12
f"',.
8.
No slopes associated with construction of the pole and accessory uses
shall be created that are steeper than 2: 1 unless retaining walls,
revetments, or other stabilization measures acceptable to the County
Engineer are employed.
9. Outdoor lighting shall be limited to periods of maintenance only.
Each outdoor luminary shall be fully shielded such that all light
emitted is projected below a horizontal plane running thoughthe
lowest part of the shield or shielding part of the luminaries. For
purposes of this condition, a luminaries is a complete lighting unit
consisting of a lamp or lamps together with the parts designed to
distribute the light, to position and protect the lamps, and to connect
the lamps to the power supply.
10. The permittee shall comply with Section 5.1.12 of the Zoning
Ordinance. Fencing of the lease area shall not be permitted.
,r\
{In the event that the Board chooses to deny this application, staff offers the
following comment: In order to comply with the provisions of the
Telecommunication Act of 1996, staff requests consensus direction from the
Board regarding the basis for denial of this application and instructions to
return to the Board with a written decision for the Board's consideration and
action. }
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A - Application and Request for Special Use Permit
Attachment B - Location Maps/Topography Map
Attachment C - Conditions of Approva1- ARB -2000-14
ARB Exhibit
~
SP 00-45
Revised
13
tP'!~j, ~
~tC
Applicqtion for Specialllse Permit
~ to << [J.!"-flI
~
. 4 - -J..--- _..._-:-......-.":'....._~-:~.~...:~ '-'V\..oll.~ .........\.
~~f~~ 9J.~6.::. f)tl6. TMP IJfl if:.: JL 12.. - p-. ~::": Q.'-Q
- MOl;' Cist. Sl.~V".J(e. St:cr ..
ATTACHMENT A
Si!o-:l#
t?C:= .Ii Ie JUZL tjJ
l'l'ojcct N;u1tc l_.....w .. rei...... ~IJ
Tri +nn . pcs 0fR. 36''R (~I">y)
."
.- -;
-.
· E:dsti11l: Use:
l'r'OPcscd.'Usc wireless teleCorrmuni.catiohs "facili1 v
.Zonic: Clstria RA .ZoDin; Otdi== Sc:aion DUmUCZ" requested I f) ~ ~ . 2--... "
Cen:cr wil1:ssUt yeu with thc:c itc.'nS) . 519 .ll8
Numbcr oC:zac.s to be c:ovaed by Spcd:zl Use PcrmitCll'.~I&_.........._~
1:0 tbi$ :an :amendm~"tt tu :an cxistin~ Spcc:i:a1 Use Permit?
At'1: you ~'UbmiUinr: :l sitc dcvelopment pbn with this :appliauon!
OYcsi3No
o Y csG!I Nu
Co n tact P~rso n (Wbom sllould we c:lllwriti: c::nc:::mnl: Ibis 1Wi='l: Valerie .W. !.one: I Escr.
. !lD:tt,~""'e, ~, Battle & Eoot:.be LL? ....
Address P.O. Eox 1288 City O1arlotteS"'ville SULc V? Zip 22902
. - ... .
Daytime Phone (..BQL) 977-'-5415 . Fax' 980-2'';C:; E-mail vwlona@'molbb:C:ait:.
9wncr or. ~nd (As fas=cl ill d= Couney's =:anfs): Robert B. and Caroline P. ~ey
Address 2427. Thomas Jefferson Parkway
City Charlottesvil~~rc VA.:.;' ~p.. .~90;)- o.
'.. ..: ;!.:'~
..... .
Daytime Phone ( ~) 295-5450 Fax.1#
E-mail
. .
. .- . .
Applicant (Who isd=COll&:C:pccoa rcpn:=Unl:?Who is~;dl=Sjlc::i:.lllSC'): C~ Contmmicatio~ .Incorporated
"
Address . ~372 FallCMater Iane, Suite C
Scare "V"i1. Zip 24014:
E.mail dalefinocchi.@
Roanoke
, City
Daytime Phone ( 5401 725-6069
crowncastle. can
. F~ # 540-725-7773
. .
Tax m:1p 2nd Ec~1 0940~-00-00-01700 Pbysical Address (i(=~)
-W-O IhA-UUl.') , 1(":f?.rt"'r~L p~w~
LOc::ltionofpt"op~rtY(~lWic.ift=--=ions.Ot'CIChcr) IDeate off Rt. 53r acce!=;!=:PO Q,y ~;:mpl
road with siqn for M:>unt Eaqle Fann.
Does the owner of this prope~yow" (or have any ownc:ship intc:'Cst in) :my abutting property? {f yes. plc:z:: li~t
. ~ncs~ :~.~ ~~=' :::c.~:.:::r ::u~c=:s IV/A J
I .. .-
OFFtCr:: c:sr:: ONt.. Y l' 1:3 In JIi1\ .l, __r/ J a..J2.. 1
FI::.: :llnuunt s3--;D ,t7) O:le P:ic! ~Chc:clc /I 3a Ti:"ltc:ccipt II ~y: ~
Hiseory: a S{ii::::! Use ?l;.~nilS: a Z."f/\.~ :and I'n:llrc::s: I
o Van:utC'.:s:
0.( "? 't:"'{.-
~ It-(a~( l.
.Q'G:ucr or Auehatiz:uion
~ ONc.J
14
An I M,. r "ti..,. Q ":1~ .~. rhr1,.,,,ft~<:,,;lI,. '14 .,.,on., .~. ""i,.n' .,o~_ <~'l., ... c., v' 0"'''.1t ,.,.,::
1""'.
Secuon 31.2..4.1 or me Alo.emarleCoufity2.oI1itl'gOi'c1ina.nce states mat. "Toe ceara or supervLSors
hereby reserveS unto itselF'ihe right to issue all special use permits permitted hereumfer. Special use
permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the board of supervisors
that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property. that the character of the district
will not be dlangcd thereby and that such use will be in harmony with thc purpose arid intent of this
ordinance. with the uses permitted by right in the district, with additional regulations provided in section
5.0 of this ordinance. and with the public he~th, safety and general welfare.
.. .
The items which follow will be reviewed by the staff in their analysis of your request. Please complete
this form and provide additional information which will aSsist the County in its review' of your request. .
If you need assistance filling out these items, staff is available.
What is the Comprehensive Plan dcsign:llion for this property? See attached
. - .
How will the proposed special use affect adjacent property? See attached
How will the proposed special use affect the character of the district surround~ng the property?
See attached
,-..\ How is the use in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance? See attached
How is the use in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district? See attached
What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of the Zoning Ordinance apply to this use?
See att.ac::hed
How will this use promote the public health. safety. and gencl':1l welfarc of the community?
See attached
~
15
-.-....-............- .,' ....,;-.. ...-"1--...... ...... --..-..... -........... ........-....--- -.. .t"-.-...-......... .......-..........-....-..... ....--..... -.... ........- ....-...........-...... -.. ~.-.......""".........
involved in the use, opera~!!g hours, and any unique features of the use: See attached
.~
/---,
ATIACHMENTS REQUIRED -,provide two(2) copies of each:
(Xl. 1.
I:&l 2. :
Recorded plat or boundary survey of the property requested for the rezoning~ If there is
no recorded plat .or boundary survey, p~ease provide legal description of the propertY' and'
the Deed Book and page number or Plat Book and page number.
Note: If you are requ~sting a special use permit only for a portion of the property, it
needs to be described or delineated on a copy of the plat or surveyed drawing.
Ownership information - If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of legal
entity or organization including, but not limited to, the name of a corporation, partnership
or association, or in the name, of a trust, .or in a fictitious name, ~ document acceptable to
the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing below has the authority
~~m '
~.
If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County muSt be
submitted containing the owner's written consent to the application.
If the applicant is the agent of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be
, ,
subri1itted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency.
OPTIONAL A IT ACHMENTS:
19]
IX)
3.
4.
Drawings or conceptual plans, if any.
Additional Information, if any.
I hereby certify that I own the subject property, or have 'the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in
filing this application. I also certify that the information provided is true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
j/~R. (;,2,,I(j
Signature
~/a-i (', w. ~tnf. ~
Printed Name ."
62 .. d.-Co -()()
Date'
'977- ~~'f5
Daytime phone number of Signatory
.--.
16
~.
Triton pes 362B (Sweeney)
Special Use Permit Application Questions:
1. . What is the Comprehensive Plan designation for this property?
2. How will the proposed special use affect adjacent property?
The proposed 82' wood pole will not advers~ly affect adjacent property, as the
pole and antennas will only extend a few feet above the tree canopy in the area,
and will be only minimally visible from adjacent property. In addition, the pole,
antennas and ground equipment will all be either naturally brown colored.or .
painted brown to blend in with the natural vegetation, further minimizing its
visibility from adjacent property. The property contains a number of other taIl
trees of similar diinensions, enabling the facility to blend in well on the wooded
parcel.
3. ,How will the proposed special use affect the character of the district
surrounding the property?
.r---
The proposed facility is not inconsistent with the existing development in the
area, .since it will not generate additional traffic' or development, and preserves the
character of the area. Because the property and the area surrounding the property
are both wooded and because the proposed pole and antenna will be within the
trees, the facility will be only minimally visible from the nearby roadways and
other properties within the district, and thus character of the district surrounding
the property will not be affect~d.
4. How is the use in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Qrdinance?
The proposed facility is consistent with the County's preference for wood pole
structures, which extend slightly above the tre~tops. In addition, wireless
telecommunications services provide a public service to the community by
creating a "convenient, attractive and harmonious community," consistent with
the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. This proposal would increase the
convenience and availability of wireless telephone service, in a manner that is
only very minimally visible to the community and is fully consistent with the
County's proposed wireless design manual. .
5. How is the use in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district?
~
17
The proposed tower will not restrict the current uses or other by-right uses
available at this site or by-right uses on any other property.
/--',
6. What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of the Zoning Ordinance
apply here?
Section 5.1.12, which out.line~ public utility structures and uses.
7. How will this use proinote the public health, safety and general welfare of the
community?
The proposed facility will provide increased and improved wireless
telecommunications ser.vices to this portion of Albemarle County, especially
emergency communications, and will increase overall communications services in
the area. This proposal will comply with the Federal Communications
Commission's gUidelines for radio frequency emissions, which will adequately
protect the public health and safety.
Describe your request in detail and include all pertinent information such as the
number of persons involved in the use, operating houn, and any unique features of
the use:
Crown Communications Incorporated ("Crown") proposes to construct, maintain
and manage a wireless telecommunications facility on property owned by Robert B. and
Carolyn P. Sweeney, identified as tax map parcel 09400-00-00-01700 on behalf of Triton
PCS, Inc. ("Triton"). Crown is a facility management company with an ongoing
relationship with Triton. Crown would own, construct and maintain the facility, leasing
space to Triton. The facility would be comprised of wooden pole and attached antennas
f1~sh-mounted to the pole, along with the necessary transmitting and receiving
equipment.
~.
Triton operates a Personal Communications Service (PCS) system, providing the
latest in wireless communications throughout the Southeast. Triton and AT&T Digital
PCS have undertaken a joint venture to expand the AT&T digital PCS network to over 11
million people in Virginia, South Carolina, North Carolina and Georgia. Triton is a .
member of the AT&T Digitaf Wireless Network, which is licensed to cover more than
eighty percent of the United States. AT&T Digital PCS provides convenient and secure
mobile communications, combining voice, messaging and paging communications in a
single phone.
Crown has entered into a lease agreement with the property owners for a 125x125
lease area. Triton's lease area would be a 1Ox20 area within the larger lease area. The
facility wi)) be located entirely within lease area. The facility will be accessed by an
existing gravel driveway, which will be extended just slightly to reach the lease area.
The location of the extension of the access was carefuHy designed to avoid the need to
remove any mature vegetation. In addition, the lease area itself is within an existing
~,
2
18
1"""'\.
small clearing. . The facility will emit no noise, glare or odor. Nor will. it interfere with
television and radio reception in the surrounding areas. The facility will not be lit, unless
required by the FAA.
To develop its network, Triton has divided the Basic Trading Area region into
small geographic sections. or "cells." Each cell site holds the equipment that provides the
air interface to the subscriber units alld must be precisely located relative to other "cells"
to create a reliable communications grid system. This grid system must reflect the
topography and traffic (user population and building density) of the "cells" as well as the
radius of the respective antenna's reliable transmission area.
Triton's FCC license requires it to operate its system in a defined service region
using designated radio frequencies. Each site must be precisely located relative to other
facilities within the network to ensure that Triton complies with thetenns of its license.
The network requires a facility at this location to avoid a gap in service to this portion of
Albemarle County.
Triton carefully selected and designed the proposed facility to provide a structure
that provides adequate height and range of coverage, while meeting the goals of the
community by minimizing the impact of the proposed facility on adjacent or nearby
properties. Location of the facility on this parcel will enable Triton to construct the
facility without the need to remove any mature vegetation, and with only a minimal
,,-....\ amount of grading and clearing.
Following Triton's thorough investigation of the properties in the geographic
area, we have concluded that there are no existing structures within a reasonable distance
of the location that are feasible for collocation and would also meet Triton's engineering
requirements.
The subject parcels are zoned Rural/Agricultural. The surrounding properties
within.2000' of the proposed facility are primarily used for rural residential and
agricultural purposes. The tract of land on which the site is located contains 519.118
acres.
We are proposing a facility at a height of82', which will result in the top of the
facility extending just above the treetops. A surveyor has measured the average height of
the trees to be 93.5','but that does not appear consistent with our visual impact analysis.
We will soon submit additional infonnation regarding the precise heights of all of the
trees within 25' of the proposed location to support and justify our request. The facility
will not extend more than 10' above the treetops.
The facility was designed to strictly comply with the County's proposed wireless
design manual. The antenna panels will be flush-mounted to the pole and will not extend
above the top of the pole. The pole will retain its natural wood color (dark brown) and
""", the antenna panels, equipment cabinet and cables will all be painted to match the color of
the pole. In addition, the concrete pad will be tinted earth tone to blend in with the
3
19
surrounding wooded area. The design and the siting of the facility will minimize its
visibility from surrounding properties, as it will blend in with the existing tree canopy in
the area.
"~
Once constructed, the facility will be visited approximately one time per month
for routine, maintenance checks. The facility will not impact the provision of seryices by
Aibemarle County. As a telecommunications facility, this proposal will serve the
community by fostering increased communications, especially emergency
communications.
Most importantly, due to its design and precise location, the facility will be visible
along Route 53 for less than 2/1 oth of a mile when driving east toward Palmyra. It will
not be visible from Route 53 when driving west towards Route 20. In addition, it will be
nearly invisible from all other roads and residences.
,~.
\\REA\29016.1
/--,
4
20
('
(
(
I
i
~
I
!
.
:IJ
'"
_x
ASIV
MIC
IUlC
IIJC
-
81S
Q.G
QJt
COIC
caNST
COIIf
DII.
010\-
ow:
\llII
ON
DI1.llEIl
0'11O
E
tA
EUI.tY
[UCf
01
~
['II
f:laSI'
Ellf
FIN
FI.IJOlI
M
"
c:.r.
QlC.V
CC
CRNO
COd
~.
-"'"
_Z
..
Kf
HlIAC
iO
IN
INFO
iHSIA.
IHT
t.8(S)
11M
U[CH
1IO.wn.
-
NIl~
~A8l.E
~ _ n.OOII
APPlIOlGIIlAlIlY
__ SlClElY IllII
lUIIlIl NG IM1IIlIU
__aa:
IIJI.DIlC
aocK
lli\SE -.E IW*l
~ SDHlllWI
QUIO
CUM
CClltCIIETE '
QOIlSYIlUCIIDN
CONI1IUlIUS
00UlII.E
0IMIE1Bt
-.
0l\I0ISIIDII
-
DEfAt.
-
tA$f
r.cH
EUVA_
EUl:IRICAl
0lU0t.
~
r.cH WAY
DlSIlNG
DlltIIIJIl
-
FUlORESCDII'
F\DOlI
fOOl'
-
~
llAOllNO
G'IPSW -..u. IIQMD
G'IPSW _
IWIOWOOO
HOllIlOHfAl.
HOUIl
-
HtA~ IIOmIC ..
.... COHllII1ONI2
lII$lD( llII'.
lOCH
~fIOH
iNSlUfIOH
IN1tRIOR
POuND(S)
--
WlCHN<OeAl.
IIOA.
_ACTUIlOI
CRaWN@~!~'!~
I?J:
COMMUNICATIONS .
90' WOOD MONOPOLE
1O'dl CONCRETE PAD WI EQtFMENT
~ RAD CENTER · 90'
ZeNG DRAwtIGS
SCCS-S
-
III!
III5C
II
Ilo\
IIC
NIS
oc../c
00
ClPG
Ol'l'
Pll'110
""
PtIO.I
-
"
fl[Q'D
..
IIG
S
$Iff
SIll
$P[C
so
55
sn.
snu:r
SUSP
W
1MIU
_0
toe
IOU
T\'P
U8C
UNO
IlNt/ICOl
-
lISl21.IMlllUS
-..
NOT AI'l'IJCAIIl.(
NOT II c;llNIlI.OCl'
NOT 10 SCAU:
ON COlIVI
0IMIll IlWCIUI
0P0lI<<l
-
PlnlOOD
'All
I'IID4CT
~
I'IlISSlJII[ 1ID1Ul
MQUfMII
lIDCllI
IlDUC:M __
SOUIH
SHm'
-..<<
SI'IOfICAfIOH
SQI.WIC
SrMUSS SlED.
SlED.
SlIlUCIUW.
-
SHEU '11M.
1MIOUCH
1ltMIl
lO' OF 0lINClIIllI
101' OF __
1'/PlCAI.
IMalII IIUlJlIIIIl
COO[
UIUSS IlOIED
0IIf0l'IllSE:
'IOII1CAl.
_ IH OOD
WM. 1U
war
-
-
WI1HClU1'
~
~
'IUIT
VII
vr
W
wI
WIll
W/O
.,
~
..
,
t
.
1
NQL
-
COlIVI UN(
~LM
AT
_01
~
Rt\1SION
@-- O[TN\. llDYJIf:HCt
nlVAfIOH II(JtII[IOC(
C!!!J AOOU NUll8ER
~
'"
"
'"
tiiJ l<m:D !IOlt
ABBfEVlATIONS AN) SYMBOlS
$(C1lON AOtROlC(
.uGIlUII
CUM OOYIUNCATIOHS CflOU'
10.5 A'IlAfIOH _. m 700
~ Me 21_
(t1l) _-142'
'AX (11') 4__1t87
SIbDIlI
1MI.Z1It ASSOCIolltS
1201 CON'OMlt CIlClL
1lONlOllE. VA 2401'
.IOItI IIoC:AIJEN
~1rl~-::O-tlllO
aB:IIIlC&
CUM CCMoIUlIl:AlICIIS _
10lS __ PItWI'. m 700
IIOIIISMUL He :meo
C,It) _-I4:M
'AX (11') ........7
~.JII
FllODUC .. IIll8EIl'I$OlI, INC.
17,. SOIEl. -. ilL
-. VA 24012
~1rl~-~3I57
ca8l.TANT TEAM
--
--
---
-_.-
\Mil:
1=-
-
\WI
. .1-"l". .. .....'.....
\WI
SITE NAME:
CARROLL CREEK
JIILIW/.E
CARROl. CMEIl
mF NtJI81I
CVR-J828
sm: AIllIABS
lHOMAS JEfJUlSOIol _.
CIMM.OT1O\IIUL "" 22t02
JIIE.JlIIlB
_ 8. .. _'IN P. SWEOlEl'
2427 THOMAS JEFFtIISON P_Y
ClWI.Oms'<lUL VA 22tD2
(804) 215-_
M!l!U:MIl
, _ ~1'lONS, INC.
m ~..\O
~""ISJI7
1724) 411-2000 - -
724) 411-2200 - .....
lElUIlIIlIt:
-
%211 ~ IlIWl
OWIlOT1tS\lUL VA 22901
Af1N: PiQNUJlIIlG oorr.
(104) 871-2211
!llIIII
_ EUCI1IIC POllOI co. ('iU'CO)
1118 ~ IlIWl
OWIlllTlES\1UL VA 22101
AlTN: KAREN AOOCEIlS
(104) '72-1714
IS'WIUI WfnIIMAnnN
lAlIlUOE - JTS8"4,14r
lDNCIlUII[ - 78'2.1'14."2'
nlVATlOH - 420.1'
70N1NC ,... &~..lYVW
ItA
70NIIIIt "'~
~.COUH1Y
..~ .......
TAX """ 84-11
Ilt!q Ilrl!Jl .. ,-
lIlI"4, PO H8
~..~
'11
~DI!'I"IIrI'
!COITSVILIJ:
PRO.ECT aMttAAy
CANDDA TE NAME: DURRER
SITE #: CVR-362B
SITE ECHO #: 801475
J.D. EDWARDS #: 12267
THOMAS JEFFERSON PARKWA"Y
CHARLOTTESVLLE, VA 22902
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
ll:lt..IA
fM..lIII.
!ElM
F\DOO ZOHI: C
lMEUIIl.
~m~':
EPtClIIIt ~fE:
DO:[IIII(/l I" ._
i~
VICNTY MAP
HH'UF'r.T rvcrlllll'l'VW
n<E PROolECT INCWDES:
INSTAUAlION OF A 10',12' CONCAt1!: PAD WI EQUlPll[NJ
IHSTAUAlION OF A 10'-0" -. lIONOIlOlC
lII11I 1WO PONEL NllENNAS (ONE Pf:lI SECTOII).
A NEW 1UD'HOIC S_ IlUN 10 $II(
A N['tI 0LCTIICAl. SDMCt IlUN 10 $II(
NO WATtR SUPPlT OR stWACE _ 10 SlIt
lUfF 0II11Ft!nnH~
FIlOlO CllOWN-cA$lU: COloMUHlCAOOHS T....E
lNlEIl$TAI[ 581 NORTH TO IHlEllSTAlt II NllfITH.
TAKE lNlEIl$TAIE 11 NOII1Il 10 W1tIlSTAf[ 14 E.<ST
10 C-.otTE5'IIlJL CONnllUE ON lNf[R$TAf[ ...
EAST 10 ElClT I ZI (AOIITE 53) SOIIIH rOR
__fELT 5 YIlt$. JUSf PAST ROUTE 721. PAST
_ ~ rNlM SlGH ON lOT 10 $II( OfT ROAD
BUDAE HOUSE 1704,
PRO.ECT DESaF110N
tMLOIUWlNO:
C-)
stEEr ,f)EX
~
BEf'OllE YOU DIG.'
CAll. UTlUTY
LDC.lTlOH SERI/IC[S.
Irs THE LAW I
MISS UTlUTY
1-IlOO-S5Z-7001
S~ Nuwrl
~
T-l
PllOJECT I,*ORMAI1ON. IIlCINlTY MAP.
SMEEf INOEX
GENDIAl. NOf[! .. $P[~11ONS
sm: SUIM:Y
C-I
C-Z
C-4
C-5
C-I
C-7
SIIt_
SITE 1lEfM. P\NI
SlIt nlVAfIOHS
ClIADOMC PlAN
SlIt DETAIlS
REC'''' ~-C""-~ 1,.,.... ~..~ I
. .1'--" ..... ~..j
AliI; 1 ~ /IIIIU
~LJ\, ,; .)11\" JJ!:: ,:
---"1-- - - - - ---
I:: ...........----_
L
~
~
ATTACHMENT
J7I _.. .._
__ '" 1$)17
(724) 41"'_
(724) 41...UIIO fM
AU._MII__c:lIIlIllIol:
_____OF_
_1lIT....__CII_
_II<[ _ _ OF IJlIlIUI
ewl...... Sal"a,
SOUTHEAST REGION
IOIlAVlATlOH'_AY
1Ull'l!7lllI
_BftU.He:m.
--1fI1l--
'!"'ClIII__
-
OM[
SI'MIII _........
1/'/fIIJ _.._
-
till. OM[
I/2J/fIII
tI2I,IlIII
7/7/00
f/t/OO
-~-
_11lIlIt.....~
_.~-
---
.. __ . ClIlI"IIIlIIIIIID.. nc IIU
_OFII<[_ ;rr.~
IIUI:r ... lIE I\' II _ .. lIS lfIUIIS.
__ GIllE 01 we _1feIClI
nc___..._
_nc__OFllC_
_ltt. CHS
CHECICIll I'r. BN
I__
CARROL CREEK
DUR.R.ER.
I _ ......
=
CVR-3628
1--
]
THOMAS JEFFERSON PKWY.
CHARLOrrESVIU.E, VA 22102
PROJECT INFORMATION,
VICINITY MAP,
SHEETIHOEX
I SHaT __
T-1
II'lOt SC'A(:
..
(-
(,
(
. DIVISION 1: STANDARD PROVISIONS
2
I
,
i
GENERAl NOTES
1 __ _ HOt TO It SCMm. l1O[ "-'lIS _ lH10IlC TO I( _nc:
. CK.T lH( _ INDlOArm 01< lH( _ SIWl. INCWD( _ 1MllIlMl.$..
~ NlO ~ _ ~ N(C[SSAIfr TO ClM'lD[ lH( _.
1IElln ~ IXIUI'MDI1 UlCA_ _ IJllOJU:t _.
2. PlIQII TO $IIIlIITTINC A lID. lH( c;oomw:TOII SIWl. \llSIf lH( JOe SIlt NlO IECOIl[
r_ 1III11l ~ COIlClf11QNS _ lH( '-OSlO 1'llOET. _ llI1QI1lllN.
_ _ Q.EC11ICH. IIIST.OUAllClIlS _ SIWJ. ADJUSf _ ~T.
J. CIOll1IIi'IC11l SIWJ. \IOWY AU. FnD CllllOII1Oll5 _ 00..- 011 lH( JOe SlIt
II(> QONflllII tHAT _ AS IOCAItD 011 lH( COIISIllUCtlOII ~~ K_
AS CllHSI1IUCIIOIl "-'lIS) _ I( AIXlOlIfIIJSHEI AS _ lIEFOlIE
.._ I'llOET __ 0' Nfr _ IllSC:llO'NlCI' _ lH( CIClNtIW:T
IIOCUWDfIS. DII5TMl COIllllTIOIlS. II(> 011 DESlCH _. lH( COIllllAC1OII SIW.L I(
III:SPOlISa[ fOIl OIT_ JHS ~TIOIl PlIQII TO PIlOCQIllIIl; Wl1M lH( _
011 llIUrm - II QUOnOIl.
5.1IlST~ ~ fllUI'lIIHf _ IMlDIWS l'[JI _ACIIlIIOI'5 ~1IOIl5 lIUSS
SPI,tII1CoOU.T _ INDlOAlID. 011 __ LOCAL coors 011 ~ TM([
P'IlECIIJOIC(.
. CIOll1IIi'IC11l SHAIJ. WIlT ... SIlt TO _ 5COI'[ 0' _ _ DISTIIC1 SlIt
. COHIII1lOIlS _. 1M HOt LMIID TO. WIJ:IWICAL SIIMCt. nm-. SOMCl:
II(> CMIIiIU._
7. ~ 'JIlDlItOIltI'I _ lA'IIlUT. SI'ICIflCATIOIlS. I'IIlFOIIloWIC( 1IlSTM!A1lOH
II(> no _ LOC:AJIllIIII/l. 10 I['~ II' flllO,j(CI' -. lH( COHI1W;IOII
SIW.L I[ ~ fOIl CClOlIDIHA_ HB _ Wl1M lH( _ _ CLrNlANCE
-.D II' _ lII1A1ID 10 SAIl ~.
I.~ ~ ~ _ ...-.s SIW.L 1UT DE tIlIIGT _ sr-. AS A
_ SWllWIl. COIIFllMIII1M AU. ~ coors. lBllW10NS _ ClIlIlIIWlCO
_ ..--. ~ 8W1. OM AU. N011CD _ _T 111M AU. IAl5.
~ IIIUS. __ _ ~ 0IIllCIlS 0' ",., PUaIC __
_ 0IllH( ~ fIT lH( -.
t. IlIl:TlIaIl. 5'ISfOIS SHAIJ. I[ IIImI.lID l'[JI N.E.e. _ II ~ WIIH AU.
~ UIUIY __ SfIQ;R:AJDG, _ LOCAL II(> srAlt ~
COllIS. -..:a _ ~ IlIGUlATIOIlS.
10.COIII1UC1OII SIWJ. PIICMO[ COOI1IlUOUS ~-..: ",., SlJI(XlIII1UC1O 011
1IQIlIOoIDI _ 011 DE ... SlIt _ SHAIJ. $UPEIMS[ _ 0IllrCf ~ _.
COHI1W;IOII SHAIJ. I[ ICltlI.T ~ _ ~ CONS1IIUCIIOII -. w:ntllOS.
1UMICIUa. 5DIUOICCl. _ _ _ ~_ AU. __ or lH(
_ UNlOl DE~.
11 I'lllWU A PORfAIU: ,. ElllIQIISHDl WIIH A 1lA_ fIT HOt LLSS _ 2-.11 011
. 2-.11101C _ ." fu;f _ OISTNQ: lO AU. __ 0' lH( I'tlOJ[cr I#IEA
..- CIlNSI1IUCIION.
12.~ ~ SIW.L I[ .. ~ WIIH _ __ ClIO[ (UIC) 1_
EDlIlOIl. AUINIl WIIH 1_ ...c:. UIIC. _ lH( 1_ NIC.
lJ. CllN1IW:11IlI SIWJ. I'lllIJU:f AU. DISlIIlO _ tHAT _ TO -. CllN1IW:11IlI
SIWl. _ ",., _ _ _ ClCCUIl ~ CONStlM:IlON.
14.-' AU. ~.lHIlOUllIt ,. IlAlID AIItAS 111M U.a.. usrm 011 r.l&. AI'PIICIWO
...-.s.
II. IlETAU _ SCMOIA1lCS _ lO _ lO _ 011I IlESUl.T or DE _. _
__ _ 110M lO . N(C[SSAIfr 10 sur ... COIlOI1IIlIS _ __
SUCtI __ 8W1. . IICWllUI AS mIr or lH( -.
1"_ AU. _ _ UltA1lOIIS Wl1M _ 1lEPIIDUIf4llllL
17. __ _ lO .- SUllFAIlES UIUS5 _ IlCJTUl.
II. aIJlMlI' _ WtTT: IlIIP I'llOET _ a.rM. _ FIlEt. _ _ fIT AU.
~~~.:g:'l~.:&.-:lH(
_ fM[ _ _ "'" ousr. 011 __ 0' Nfr M1UlIL tIC
COIII1UC1OII IIW.L. I[ IIDPOIIS&[ _ _ AU. SY5lOlS ~ .. A
CUM _ _ UNI1l. ~ 0' DE IIIlOoET II' I'llO.ET -.
11. ~~lH(cc:::r~~~1lU.~~~lO
HIlS IEDl MWIDID DE FNlIlSPEl:llON.
1110 (2) COI'lCS fIT -..:D _ 1lU. I[ _ TO IIIlOoET _ _
lH( 0illNaJL (1 Dal)
DIVISION 2: SITE WORK-02100
~
00
;,
EAA1HWORI( AND DRAINAGE
~AIIf I __
1. ~ ~ I.NIllIlMLOl'llDlf PI.OH ANI SlIt PI.OH fOIl _ 1IlCWOal.
2.~fIT~~_
1.1IST/lWl_ 0' UlU1Y .. ~ SYSTDI
e.__ or rou
J.~_._-'ANDsms__1O_Aww.
1IllOIIIDl. (ASIl.T _. tVOI SUtlf'AI:( fOIl *_ _ _ _ _
~ flOISONIIIL ..cass.
4. r-=T~SlIlllI.IZEJl .. -.ct WIlIl _rACMtJn llClXIUIIDIDAl10N (ust 4$
.. =='liuos 8W1. I[ -.c NIl _MG AS Rl-..orD II' lH( saD
-..cPl \IF~.
Co __ F IIICWOQ) _ lH( CON1llACT. Wl.l . PUoCED _
__ 4$ ~ II' IlUIISEJI'( INllUSTR\' sr_ IF _).
I. ~_ _ _ srr ~ _ lO 11ft CCNS'IllUCIlOIl
1.lH( COIiII'I.Dt _ _ SIlt _ Wl.l I[ ~ PlIQII TO ~TIOIl
c;ON$l1IUC11ClN 011 P\.4lCIMIIT fIT ~ fU. 011 SIIiJ-lIASl 1MlPlW..
e. c;oNSIIlUCT 'IDIPClIWlT CllNSIIIUCTIOIl ZONt ...:cas OIM
O. lH( SM _ Wl.l I[ lIlIOUllH1" 10 SIIiJ-IAS[ COl.a: IU.\MTION _ DE /II:CDS IllWI
TO lIASl ~ C/I.'tIlTlON PlIIOIl 10 .- nlUIlIMlION.
I. -..T SOl. SlIlllI.IZEJl _ lO PIJQIIC WE *~
r.~~.::'= m": = ~:=...- SlIt
c. ~ -. _ 1DII'OIWl't CONSlllIIC:IIOI ZOIC TO M .u1HOIlIZI; _ 011 AS
.. ~'" II' I'IIQ,j(CT IWl/IIllOI. 1M .-lO 11t[_ I'IlIICl! lIST I!!!II'II:ll!lN
-..T lIlIIO; (5), _... ". _. _.__ ._ _ .._
_orroll().
L _. olI'fI\IC4I1OIl fIT FNl. SUIlFACES. -..T SOIL S'ltMJZIJI TO lH( STOIC SUIlFACES.
..~
~~~~ TO lH( CON1llACT. "hIO COI'CS fIT 1Ml _ I'UH
~ MJlISIJll' l.El1UIHDD. F A I.ANDSCN'l AU.OWAHCI: _ IICWllUI .. lH(
COln~. All I11MDD IJSI1IIIl or ~ COSIS UNlOl NUlISIRT LET1Ulll(AI)
l_lOSIIl__~~~
a."" fOIl -. 1/2 a.: FllCIT or lH( "AI:( COUIIS[ 1M1DlIolL
I.I/FT'D1 CClNSI1lUCl1ON . .
1. _M:NRllI'S llDl*'11OII or PMDlCT II(> lIllIlIWlYT STAlDIOIf 011 SOl. 51IlIIlIZm.
z._~' llDl*'11OII or _ 011 _ _ I'IImUZEII
J.~ _ sr_.
7._
A. II AIlOITIOIl lO TIl( ~ 011 AU. CONSI1lUCTIOH ClMIl(O IN 1Ml ~
IlOClIIIIIIS tIC CiONIIlAClOII SIlAU. IlII'oIIll AU. _ NIl A[P0IIl _ ~ AS CI.Q5[
10 __ _ AS ~ TO I.(AS( I#IEA _ 011 SUlllIOUHOINC
l:MJSm II' COIlS1IIJc:IlOI
.. SOlI. 51tM.IlAl1ON -.e..TION Wl.l ~ \IIIlrT_ PIllE IlCWI _ SlIt AIItAS
fOIl OHI: 'IfNI _ ClAlt or _ lNSl'ECl1ON.
Co __ AIItAS 1lU. RlFI.Dlr _ fIT Nt'<< CRASS CO/Ol _ TO FINAL _CllOIl.
o.~. " IIICWOQ) _ TIlt SCIlI'( or lH( CllNI1IolCT. WU 8( GlJAIWI1ml f'OR
OHI: 'IfNI _ IIl\lt fIT _ IlSPlClllN.
mIr 2 IIDIOUIIOIl
I. IlOoOUI1IlH SHAIJ. . ~ 10 ~ lH( _ fIT OUST TO 0CCUPlID PORl1ONS
011 lH( __
2. lXISl1Nll _ TO _ IIW.L. J( ~CIII) _ __ _ ClAIMC(J) Wf
CONlIW:IOII IIW.L. . __ TO IMTCH DaS1INll -.
J. AT nc _ 0' Dal _ ClAT NIl lIUIlNl _ ..._. CI.Cl5I: ~ tll1OtIOIl
_ WIlIl lIJj>1IlPII'ROOF _
4. _ _ _ __ F'IlOU tIC SlIt IlIlILT. 00 IICIf IUl1fI _ NIl __
TO lIICCUIIUlA1'[ .. __ 011 01< SIlL
So _ flOOll NCI ~ 'fN[11Io\TIOIlS:
A. COIllllAC1OII _ UlCAJ[ llElfjfOllCIlC MIS .. DISlWC f1.OOIl SLqS USllIC A IlWA8t.C
1IOIl~ 1t51IIG ~ _ II' 1I1t: OWIU. lXlll[ 0IlIU. AS ICCUSAIIT
10 _ CAlL[ PENOIlATIOIl WIIHOUl' QIr1Nl DIS1IOG R[JHrOIICINC: IARS.
.. fU. 0P0lNl I/FT'DI CAlL[ IIISDIJNlON 111M __'$ _A-FlA[ __ SI\ACON[
IllV _
_5~
I. lI4lIIIMS
~ ~ ~ 110 - .... 10212-7 _ _ - EPA MCISIDlED
_ _ _ INIlUSTIllll. PIlOOUCTS
~.o. _ 5123 1435 _ AVE.
~ .. 41128 1U 513 __ lIMON. "" 07~ 1tI. 100 518....14
I. IIClAl) _ SlIt ~ SHo1U COIIRlIIIoI 10 VA DOT IllWI _
~ ...... 1_ WHIM IlEJtJlDICED TO fU. IM_ -
ACaI'f4a.[ SfUCT fU. SHo1U I( It AIlCOIlIIIHC( WIlIl VA DOT
__ fIT PI8JC _ATIOIl _ SPltlfICA1lOIl.
Co SOL SIDIUZDl SHM.l . _ __ fIT UOUIO COOII'OSIlIOlt _ or
I'll( DlUlGDlCE 0f:9GN.
D. SOl. srAllJlIJI r_ SHAIJ. I[ _ - __
z. ~ SIIAU. I[ AC:eOWUSIEII II' __.IDIIS.
1. _ _ SHAIJ. I[ 0ClIlI'W:TEIJ II' SICO'S FllOT __ 011 _ 11RlII
IIIlUOlS lIElGNlOll AT lfAST FM TON5.
2. _ Nl€AS SIlo\U. I[ COOII'ACIUlII' _--. _ MELD T~
_ 4 DfQIIIClIl
1. ~C11OIlS__ IlSI'll:TOIlS SIWJ. I[ _ NO IDS _ 41 _ .. NNNIIC[
0' COIlCIlEI[ _ UII,.DS _ Sl'Cl:nD II' _ 011 LOCAL JUlII5OlC1IOH.
2. PlIEPAIIA1lOIl
~C&UIl1llEES, _ _ _ _ SIlt AIItAS _ __ _ _ or "T
AS 0IIlIX:1DI II' ~ -.
I.PlIQII 10 CI1IIOl PCAIIATIOIl NIl CONS1'MJtIION EnllIIlS _ OIlCNlC IMltIIlII. TO A
_ ~) ICHES II1.OW -. _ IML.
CoUlUSS IIlS'IIlUtltD II' PIlO.IU:r IWlOGUI _ ~ _ YIla.
_ NIl _ _ THE _ TO lit AUI1lOllIZI:D lMMLL..
D._ 10 ~ 011 fU. 011 lIASlIM1IJIlII.S, IlOU. lH( 5011..
L WHOlE _AILE SOIl. CClIlll1llIIS .w: 1IlCOUII1ERlD. UN[ or tIC ~ AllIEAS
_ SYMUZIJI IMT PlIQII 10 P\JIC8lDft" fIT fU. 011 lIASl ....-.
2. IIlSTlUATIOIl
~;::t=.:.:o.=:=:= n.V~ =:.c::=~..~
tHAT _ lVDl __ or -. lIlllUl.1Ill: ..- RlUlGATION OCAVAl1ON5.
nc ___ __ Wl.l ~ _ ... __lIASl COUIIS[, faVA_ _
10 I[ CllL(:UlAltD _ _ _ 011 SI.OI'IS IIIDCo\lID.
1.:r.='fIT~~.=mar:=~~ =.:r
c. ~~llClAD SIlo\U. I[ __ TO" ~ 1Lf.VA_ PIIOIIlO fOUNClATIOIl
COIlSlIIUClIClI 10 _ llSL CCMW:l1OIl NIl _ IMINO CONSlll\ICllOlI fIT
tIC SIJE.
0._ CII(A_ DEPlIESSIOIlS __ M1IJI _ I'OlCI.
L 1IC CIClNtIW:T 8W1. . AS$UIl[I) 10 INCWD[ ~ -. IIlTCI.c AND UIUS5
CIIHEINIS[ __ _ 1110 IItCHQ 0' SUIlF_ COUIlSE. AU. _ 011 IIOUl1:S
UItJIlD fOIl ACCaS 10 1M[ SlIt __ iii lH( _ fIT IN1IRSl'Cl1ON lII1H 1H[
,.="~ ~~ _. ClWlt: tIC DISTIIC1 _10 _ 11ft
c.~fU.~S::S:O::= ~ ~~~~N[XT lWT.
M.~~~=-=~~~~,= ~~U fIT OHI:
L lIPlW' SIlAU. I[ ~ lO lH( _ SLoPES fIT AU. F1JlC[D Ill[ AR[AS. ~_
MIPS. _ lO AU. CIlHOI SLOI'f:S _111I _ 2:1.
J. lIPlW' 8W1. I( ~ TO lH( SIIlO or 0IfCI4D 011 _ S1IIUS.
IC.lIPlW' [llJIII[ _ _ SIIC PUT .. ~_~ AT ClI._ -.
L SDJI nJlR.IZEll _ ...- CCMII SItOl.I. . -.c lO ~ CIlHOI ~ AlItA$.
...:o.T'~~'o:e.~ ~Vmrs I[ PUoCED SO 1HtT
~ _ TOMlDS. 011 _ _ _ .......m.y AO.IIoCtNT TO RNUIWO
M.lASI. IF _ 011 1Lf.VA_ COIIFUCT WIlIl 1HIS CUIlWIC[ 11._ $HOl.U) I[
_ 1UIlQ)IA1tI.T.
N... _ UES Wl1M 5I.Ol'[S CII(A1EII _ 1(N PEIlCUlT. IlOUNll IlI\IEItSlOIWlY
~ .. nc _ iii ClI._ l1I1RAIlCa. lH( ~ 5HAU. II[ POSII1OH[D
AT III NQ.[ NO 0IlrA1EIl _ 10 IItGIQS OfF lH( DI1CH lINE. _ 1l1[ UPS11I[AU
III[ fIT DE ~ AS ww. AS DE DI1CH IClIl $Ill PUT _ TIl( CULIIERI"
IIJI1Ma.
DIVISION 3: CONCRETE WORKS-03310
1. D\W.IlT ASSURANCr:
_T WIIH _ fIT DE ~ coors. SPltlfICA11llIlS _ sr_.
DC8'T _ UORl SIII_ -.uMS _ _ 011 _
~ /11:I .J01__ 'SPftFICAIlOH fOIl SIlIl.ClUIAl. COIlCIlEI[ fOIl. _'.
1./11:I ;JII ~ ClIO[ RlClUlllOlfNlS _ IIONflIlICEIl ClQIICa(l[' (RlVIS€D 1"2)
_ AClS1___ ~Allt' (lIl'Il5DIlm)
c. COIlCIlEI[ _ srm tNI1lM[ (QII). ~ or ST_ PllAC11C[".
2. ~"5.GlWlf 10 DEFOIlIG
L__ _ r-..sIN A "' __ 11m _ f'IIllIC.
c..-rs _ ~:8lU1UlS. -. _ NIl CIlHOI Ql>IIC[S fOIl
. _~_!lOlFll!lCIl!lI!llS... ~ ust-[ ..... T11'[SUPl'Qll11
...-..._ _,n __
J. _ UAJPIlIS:
A. POlflUNO C[Il[NT: _ e 150. 1'/P[ I. .
LI.IOH11IEJOMI" 4IlOIlEll411S: _ C ;uo
c.___ ~ _ e 210 CIllmID II' 1Ml __ TO I[
~ Wl1M _ IlEOUIIID ~
..~-.oNll_flT_
_ ... lO PlIlMOE _ COIClI[1[ _ nc _ ~
~ _ ,. _T __ SlllDClM
~~~Oo.~.""'" _Mt-cNllWllQl). 0.>> _ (NIl~)
DIVISION 4: UNIT tAASONRY-04220
I. COIlClI[l'[ ILOQCS:
~ SfNI(WlD Il.OCk SIlo\U. . nc 5IZ[ IlIIlC4l1D 011 lH( -. UGlfl flllAT 011
JI[lfII',M. COUlIl. _ 8W1. CllNnIRU lO lH[ RlQUIIO.t(HTS or _ e 10: T11'[ I.
_ N. ~ 1'/P[ 111M ~ $UIG _It.
1_ .
~ All IIClIIfAll _ CONC1l(T[ IUlC1CS SIW.l CQNF\lIN TO A$Tll e 270. T\'PE S ANO
SIWI. MA'I[ A COIII'RtSSIVt $llIOCIH 0' 3000 PSI .. 28 ClAYS.
3. ~T11'[O::~SIW.l . 1lUII-o-lIAU.. 011 [OUOL rAllllCArm _ A
r-:~or:"~~SHAIJ.~=>>~mTONOk..~I~
CUS$ 3. $lD[ IIODS IIW.L. I( . GAl:( 5/'" -.... LENCmI SIlo\U. I[ 10'-0' 1III1l
I. := = ~TEE= AT ir \IIll1DI. _AL. cr _ _ ANO
Co AT ~ _ NIl enow Dal ClI'(ljING PI.<cE AONFOACIHG III OHI: AQOlI1IlNAI.
:= ~;.:r~T~.~':iss~g ~ ~~A1.
4. 1lS1AU. srm UHIUS _ Dal ~ fU. COII[$ WIIH CIlOUI 3 CDUllS[S enow
l.IlIII.~
DIVISION 5: STRUCTURAL STEEL-05120
1. = ~ fIT 1IC f1lU.OlIING coors. Sf'EClflCATIONS NfO sr_.
DCEPI WHOlE lIOIll: $I1lIIlC[NT REOUIAOI[NI'S _ _ 011 sPEc:nD:
A. MSC '1:00( or _ 1'RIlC11IX".
1.~"::~~~Zrr~~.
Co _'" IIIi.OINl: SllClDT (AIlS) 01.1-12. ~ __ ClIO[ - srtn..'
2. r~ S1m. "-'ltS. 5HU'D _ _ _ A 34.
,.___~___A3a5.
~~'~sr~_VMIZEIl" ~E WI1H _ A 1$J.
I. COIOf; ClIOUI: 0IIl[C0 II' IMS1GI __ fIT lit __ [OUOL
r. _.IltTAWC. ~-llESISI-. 4000 ,. CQUPlI[S$I'I[ STROCI1I GROUT.
_ OHI: or lH( _ 011 III __ __
1. EUC>> N.s. II' DlCUI CHDICAI. 00.
2.1MSTEllfUlW 713 II' IMS1GI MIXIlS
DIVISION 7: SEALANTS AND CAULKING-07900
I. ~.-r SE.4lDIS. JOM fUIJtS _ CI1IIOl IlQ.UQ) ....1UIIAI.S tHAT NI[
COIIII'AlII..[ _ OHI: _ _ WIN JOIIfT SUISIIlAIIS UNlOl CIONDITIONS 0'
SIlIVlCt _ Al'PUCAllllNS. _ COLORS 10 1M1tH AIJ.MCOIf SUllfACU. _
LtaI 011 0IHDl IlEVIIW. CCUlIl WID NO (IIItlIl aJlIIIl IS A~
Z. OHI:_ I'OI.Y$llI1D( lNED. ON[ ..- ElAS1OlIOlIC ~. COUPl._ 1III1l
fS TI-s-GODO.clA$S A T'IPt . 1___).. fOIl _ AT POlmlATIONS 1HIlOUCH
IllmIOIl .ua. __ COWOllND _ DE 1HIOCIll QDIlCAL _ SEAl.
fIT .-. 1'lllWU. OIC or DE _ 011 lit ~ ~
A. f\DIISfAL 100 $UIO II' llN'. INC.
L NOIlNfUX OHI: - _ II' _Jl. -.: .. CO.
2. _..-r ~ SPlAHT: -.: _-. SOl_ _ ON[-l'AIIf
~ __ _. SOUDS HOt l1SS 1*N _ ~ COUPl.YINll WIIH
fS TI-S-JImO. ClASS . T'IPt .. fOIl PfJIlIIDtII 0' 1l[TAI. NIl OOOR _.
MlDHlUS AT ~ -. _ _ Sl.U'Ia _ ~ M.LS NIl fUlOIt
SlAlIS. ~ OHI: fIT lH( _ 0' M __ __
~ """ _ II' llN'. INC.
1._ 11I-5 II' GAItS _JlIlIC
4. ~~~~~:TtH[~C:-~~
[IllW.:
~ VIA.CIilD II' _Jl. ClAIC[ .. CO.
DIVISION 8: UETAL DOORS & FRAMES-08110
,. _ OOORS NIl _ COUPLWlCl 1II11l STEIL _ IIIS111U1E "REcouUEllOED
SP[CIFlC411ONS fOIl sr_ STEO. DOClIl _ __ (SOl 100). _ AS _
SPIX:lfU.
2. ~ SHOP __ f'OR DE r-.CATIOIl _ EJl[C;llON fIT HllWlW UElAI. _
- flIAMEs. INCWDE O['IAI.S 0' DCH ~ TI1'E. EUV4JIONS 0' OOOR IlUlGN 1\'PES.
_lOllS AT _ DErM.S or CQllSI1IUCI1ON.
~~or~~~~~-::=OlEIfT.
J. WHOlE fWlE-llAltD OOOR ASIOIllUES All[ IlIIlC4TED 011 RlllUIIWl. PllllYIO[ F11t[-tlArm
DOOlI NIl _ ~ tHAT COMPlT _ NFPA 10 "STNIClAIlD fOIl flit DOORS NIl
~. NIl HAIlE IIUN ltSltIl. usrm NIl IAIlIUD .. ACCOIIIWlCE WI1H _ [ 152
"STANClAIlI) lIEIMOOS or FIRE lESlS or _ -.J[S" II' A M~Y IItCOCNlZm
INOEI'tNOtNI 1I$1Nl NIl INSl'[CllOIl N;OICt _AlII.[ TO AUI1lORIIIES _
JUAI$IllCn)N.
4. HOt-1IIlWD srm SIlW'S NCI SlIlI': COllUEllCIAI. OUAUIT ~ srm.. P1C1Cl.ED NIl
OUD. ClluP\.WIO 1III11l _ A _ AND _ A. _.
5. COUI-IIOULD S1m. SH[[lS: ~ OUAUIT ~ Sl[[l. COMPlYlNll WI1H
ASl1lA.lNNIl_A-.
.. S\.II'POIm ANI _ r-.CAlt or NOr LLSS _ II CAe[ SHEET srm...
7. INSERIS, 1I0llS Nt1J r_ _OC1\IIl['S sr_ UNIl$ COUPlYINC WIIH
A$Tll A 1$J. cu.ss C 011 0 AS APP\JCAIl.L
II. SNOI'-~ ~AINT: _ STm.SUllfllCt$ US[ llUSI_ DWIEt. 011 PAINT.
EI1HEIl AIlI-OIl'/lNC .QIl -..c. surAIU: AS A _ _ sPECIFD fINISH ~AIN1S.
.. rAllllCAl[ tlOIJ,OW UDM. UMS lO . -. NEAT .. Al'PEAIlAHCt NIl f1l[[ _
DErtm. _ .011. IUCIlIL lIHEIIDUl 1'lIAC1J::AL.. flI .wi ASSOIIIU: UNITS IN 1M[
=~'5~.;..~~lO~~~~~[~'
ACCEPtAkL
io.COMPlv1lllH SOl-lOll _ AS fllWlWS: IN1VIIOR _ SIlo\U. . SOI-l00.
_.1. tfl#t 1lUlT. UOIl(L I. _ " CM:E rACES.
I1.[1lPOSED rA5lUlEllS: UNU:SS CIIHOIWISI; INDIC4l1D. PIllMD[ CD\IlITIJISIJNI FIAT
I'HIU'$ 011 __ _ _ DPOsaI _ NIl 110I.15. .
12._ *"- l'RlI'ltIlAJ1ON ~ HllWlW U[fIoL UNIIS 10 IEEM -..sf: ANO
~_~~~"'S~~~
~ SlI'fIl,EII. COMPlT - ~.llIllUIllDCHlS fIT _ A 115
~ fQIlOOOR NIl PIlAIII ~.
13. PllO\ItO[ S1m. It[INf'ORCII<<; AT HlNCES IN tlOW)W "[TAl. UNI1S TO II[ 7 CAe[
. 10 1/2' . _ REClUIRlIl.
14. PIlOYIll( HllWlW 1l[TAI. DOORs r:F 1I<E T\'Pts INDlCArm ON THt ORAWINCS AND
COUPl'/lNO WI1I< SOI-Ioo........,.. Io\AIOlW.$ Nt1J COOI$IRUCTlON RtQUlAtwEHIS.
15. PIIOYIOt HOl.l.OII 1lETAI. flWlES QF1I1t: l'Y1'ES AND srru;s 1NDICA1t0 01< lH( IlltAWlNCS
_ COIlPlYlNll WI1H SOl .100. _E 18 CAGE ~ AT IN1tIlIOA L.OCA11ONS.
HOlt: OOOA SIIAU. BE OPEAA8l.E FOR E)(IIlNC F1IOlI THE INSIDE WI1HOUT !HE USE or A
I([Y 011 101<< 01H[Jl sr>tclAI. DEW:E-
=-
IlOr IlI1rASID
"=,,,
.
+f!!!L~~
m ~ ..w.
c.-_ "" IU"
(7241 41__2llOO
(724 41___ rl>l/.
-
4'" rr~
11~~1.UO ~J
~~~~
~"A,,9
--
llU.____~
_ARlM_flT_
_ lIllI' 11II1[ ~ lID CIlIllDO!lD
_ M _ _ (IT.......
0..-.. Soluti.n
SOUTHEAST REGION
IOt'AIIMTlClIl~_Y
turft 7011
..-vuLlCmeo
_"'1'-
-lt111-
.
1-
11lI1E
1/15/00
'/1/00
-...-
-... ..
1--
IIIlI. IlIl[
I/UJIIll
7/1/00
t/t/OO
_10-
-10-
_ ....1IDlf
__II__II_SlIU
_flTM_ 1I11-.c1l
1IIlILT....,__...,_
__. fII[ (IT lIIS_1IfI/II
___..11_
----",--
_II': CHS
CHEClCED 11': BTM
1_ -
CARROLL CREEl
I:>U~~E~
I !II[ .....
CVR-382B
I SIll AllllIIlSS
THOMAS JEFFERSON PIal
CHARLOlTESVILLE, VA 22
I SIUI nru:
GENERAL NOTES ..
SPECIFlCATlONS
I SIUI ..-
C-1
III\D1" SCALE:
(
(-
(
~ DIVISION 1: STANDARD PROVISIONS
2
I
~
~
I
*
GENERAl NOTES
, OIWiIHGS ARE NOr TO 8E SCAUI). THESE PlANS ARE INTENDED TO 8E _nc
. ONLY. 1l1E WOIlK INOlCATED ON THE _GS SHN.L INCI.UIlE: F1.IRIUSHIHC ......TERIAI.S.
EQUlPloIOlT NlD ~R'/tIWICEll, _ WIOR NECESSMl' TO CONPU:IE 1l1E WORK.
VERIN ,IU [QIJIPIIENT UlCo\11ONS WIlH I'RO.JEl:f 1IANAllER.
2. I'fltOIl TO SU8\llTTlNG A SIO. THE COHTRN;rOll SH.<I.L VISIT 1l1E JOlI SI1E NlD BECOlIE
rAOllUNl WIlH ALl. COHDII1ONS ~ THE PAOI'O$[l) PROJEC:r. IHCl.IJOlHC 0DI0lJTI0N.
IIECl1ANICH. NIIJ ~ IHSrALIAllONS AND ~ IIlloJUSf IlID AI:CCl\DlHOLY.
3. CON1IW:TOII SHAU. 'IEtllIY ALl. Fln.D OONOIITOHS NlO OIIIENSIONS ON THE JOB SI1E
::>~T~ ~~~c:~~~~ KNOWti
4.NCJlll'Y PROoIfX:T _ or _ _ DISCREPANCY _ THE ~
DOCUMENIS. ~ CONDIIIOH$. AND 011 _ IJIFEI(I'. JllE COHllIACTOR SHN.L K
RESPONSIIU: fOR osr_ lIIS ~llON PRIOR TO PROtallINC WIlH THE WORK
011 RElATED WORK IN QUESlI()N.
5.IHSr,IU ..u. EQUIPIIENT _ lIAlERIAI.S PfJI _~ER'S RE~llONS UN1.ESS
SPWnc.<U.Y OTIf(RlIl5E INClfCAlUI. 011 WHERE: l.C)("AL COOES 011 REGlMllOHS T_
PRECEDENt(.
6 CONJRAClllR ~ \IISII' .101I SI1E TO RE\IItW scoPE or WORK AIID txISl1NC SI1E
. CONIlITIOHS ttCUJOIHC. BUT N01 IMTED TO. 110:_ SElMCE. D.ECTIIlCAL SEIMCE
_ aJEJW..L COORIlIIW1ON.
7. ,IU lUil'HONE/AAOIO EQUlPIiENT lAYOIJT. SPECFlCATlONS. PEIlFllRIIANCE. IN5TALlAT1OH
AND THEIR FINAL UlCo\llON ARE TO 8E NlPRO'IED BY PROJECT __ 1l1E COIlI1lACTOR
SHN.L BE RESPONSI8l.E FOR COORIlINADiG HIS WORK WItH THE WORK _ ClENWlCE
REQWlED BY 0l1lERS RElATED 10 SAID EQUIPl/EHT.
S.,IU _K PERf'ORIIED NIIJ lIATalIILS SHAU. IIET JllE HIGHEST 11WlE SfAHOARDS. I>S A
IINl11U11 STNIIWlD. COHr_ WITll ,IU APPI.lCAIIl.E CODES. RECI.\Al1OHS NIll ClIlIlIIWIC6
HAVING .I\JRISOIC11OII. COHIlW:IlIR ~ OM: ,IU NOTICES AND COlolP\.Y WItH ,IU lAlflS.
0IlIlltWlCe5. RUu:5. RI:IOIJlAllONS NlD lAWfUL OIIDERS OF _ PUllUC MI1HORlIY
_ ON JllE ~ OF lHf: WORK.
I. ElECTRICoOl. S'l'STE\IS SIWJ. BE INSTH.I.ED PfJI N.E.C. NIIJ IN ACCORIWlCE _ AU.
N'I'UCAIILE I/I1UTY COIIPNt( RClflCATIONS. _ I.OCIl. AND Sf ATE JURISllICTlOHOI.
<XlOES. 0RllI1IAHCES AIID N'PlJC:HII.E RECUlAllOHS.
10.CllNIRIClllR SHAU. PftO\IIllE CONlIHUOUS S1JPEJMSION WIfI\.E Nt( SUllCXlHl1W:TORS OIl
__ ARE ON THE .101I SITE AND SHAU. SUPElMSE _ DIRECT ,IU WORt<.
CllNIRIClllR ~ BE SOl.ELY RESPONS1tlLE FOR AU. COH$IROCIlON lI[AH$, llETItODS.
_IS. SEQUOCCI AND PIIlCEDURES NlD COOIlIlINA11HG ,IU PORI1ONS OF THE
WORt< UNlER THE <XJNlR.C'.
11. Pl\OVIOE A PORrAlll.E FIRE EXT1HGlJlSHER WIlH A RA1IHG OF NOr USS llWf 2-10 011
2-A1OBC Wl1HIN 75 FEEr _ ClSTAHCE TO AU. PORI1ONS or THE PRO.IECT NIEA
IlUR1HG COHS1RUC11ON.
12.,IU CONS1ll\JCT1ON $lW.l. lIE IN ACCORDANCE WIlH UllFOR11 MADlHll CllllE (use) 1114
Clf11ON. AI.ONC WItH ,_ UPC. ~. AND 1l1E ,_ NEe.
13. CllNIRIClllR SHAU. _lECT AU. DlISTIHO FI_ _T ARE 10 __ CONllIAClOR
SHN.L REPNR Nt( _ _T IIAY 0CCUll IlIJRJNC COHS1IlUCI1OH.
14.5E.<L AU. POlEl1lAllONS. _ FIRE RATED AREAS Wllll U.L. USIED OIl F.II. N'l'Il(MD
IoIATERw.s.
HI. DETAIlS _ SCHEWollCS _ 1'0 PROPOSE TO SHOW OIl RESU\.T or lIIE 1lfSIGH. ..INOR
IlQOIACAllONS MAY OEEII 10 BE HECtSSARY 10 WT JOlI CllHllfIIOHS AHIl -.
SUCH 1IOlllf1CA'lIONS ~ BE IHCIJJDEO I>S PAIIf OF THE WORK.
16. 'IEllIFY ,IU FItW. _ UlCo\TIONS WIlH OWNERS IlEPRESEHTAlNE.
17.1lIIIENSlONS ARE 111 _ SURFACES UNUSS C1lHEIIWISE HlIlW.
IS. CI.ENtUP AND WETY: I<EEP PIlO.IECT NIEA ClEAN. _ f1lEI1. NlD OISPOSE OF AU.
1lIRl". DE8llIS. RUlIIlISH AND EQlIlPllENr REIlCMD AND NOr SPEQFIED I>S _ THE
PROPERlY or THE OWNER. EfC. lfA'IE PIlEIlISES It A V~ AND _ ClEAN
CoNomoH: FIlff: FIlllII PAM SPOTS, OUST. 011 _ OF _ HA1IlRE. THE
CllfIllW:1llR SHNJ. BE -.E RlR __ AU. S'l'STE\IS EQUf'IIEHT IN II
ClEAN WORKING _ UNl11. .occEPTAHCE OF THE PROJECT BY PRO.I(CT _.
II THE CENERAL CONlRAClOR IS RESPONSlBlE fOR REDUHlNG THE COII$IRUCllON PI.'NS TO
. Il.I.USIRAlE THE 1>S-1lUlU COliOlllOH OF THE SITE. THIS wu. lIE DONE mtR THE SITE
HAS BEEN AWAIIlED THE FIW;. tHSI'EllI1ON.
~ g.&:'1S(101' ~ -.as wu. lIE PRCMOED 10 PROJECT _ NIO
DIVISION 2: SITE WORK-02l00
8
......
en
......
""
EARTHWORK AND DRAINAGE
PARr I GO/ERN..
1. ~~~ IIlHO otVE1.OPlIENT PlAN AND SITE PlAN f'OR WORt< IHCI.UDED.
2. RaAlUI WORK
A. CCHSTlIUCIlON or BUIUlIHG FOUH~TION
S.IHSTALlAllON OF UIlU1Y .. GROU_G SYSTDl
C. ERECTION OF FENCE
3. ~~. TURHNIOUIIO NIEAS. ,,"0 sms ARE CONSIlIIJCIU) TO PRO\'IDE A WEI.l.
ORNHED. EIlSIl.Y _AlHED. EYEIl SURFACE FOR NATERW. AHO [QIJI_ llEI.MRllS AHO
IINNTENAHCE PERSOHHEI. ACCESS.
4. ~~Y ~~UR IN ACCOIIOAHCE WIlH MANUFACtURER'S RECOIIIIO/OATlON (USE I>S
s. ~kos SHAI.l. IlE APfUll AHO lIAlNTAIHED AS RECOOllIEHOEO BY THE SEED
PRODUCER (IF REDUIlED1.
C. vt:CEl'A1ION ~ If INCLUDED WIlllIN THE CONmACT. WIU. BE PI.ACED AND
IINNTAIHEIl I>S RECOlIIlEHOED IN NURSERY 1HOU$IIl'/ SfNlllNlOS (If REQUIRED).
5. 1~ SURIIEY SfN(fS AND SET ELtVAIlONS PRIOR TO _ CONSfRlJC'IlON
8. THE COIlPLDE ROAD 1M) SITE AREA WIU. 8E CRUSSED PRIOR TO FOUHQAllON
COHSIRUC11ON or P\.OCEIolENT OF SACK FlU. Of! SUS-IJASE IofAlEI\tAl..
C. CONSTRUCT lEIIPORIlRY CONSIIlUCIlON .ZONE ACCESS ORM:
D. THE SITE AREA WU BE IIIIOUllKT 10 SU8~1JASE COURSE EUVAllON AHO lIIE ACCESS ROAD
10 IJASE COURSE ELtVAllON PRIOR 11l FORIIIHG F'OUHOATION.
E. N'P\.Y ~ SItM.JZER PRIOR 111 PlACING BASE NATERtALS.
F. GlWlE. SEED fERI1JUR _ llUl.CH DlSTURIlED AREAS I_my mtR 8IlIHGlNG SI1E
AHO ACCESS ROAD III ~ COURSE ELtVAnON. WIllER 10 OISI/RE GROWlH.
c. _ CONSTRIJCI1OH ZONE TO "" NJTHOAIZE AREA 011 AS
-. N sur PRtOII 10. 1HE ~. PflHCH USf IHSPECROH.
APPlY 01' 1/4
I. ~~nolis or FINAL SURfACES. N'P\.Y SOI~ SltRlUZER 10 1HE STONE SUllFACES.
e. SUlIIIITTALS
A. ~~ ~ TO THE COIfIRN:f. '!YjQ COPIES OF THE ~_ PlAN
UHOER NURSERY lEIltllHOO. IF A UHllSCAPE AU.OWAHCE 'lIAS IIlCUlOEO IN THE
CONTRACT. All lTEloIZED USIIIIll or PR()flqSCl cosrs UNDER NURSERY lEIlEIlHfAO
2.= ~~AL. nr;2~ ~ SURfACE COURSE MAlEI\tAl..
S.~~1)ES(;lIII'IION or Pl\OOUCT ANI) ~ SfAlEIIENT ON ~ STERIUZEO.
2.~FAl:T\jll(R'S DE$CRIP11OII OF Pl\OOUCT ON _ _ FtRI1UWl
3.1IlHIlSCAPlHC _ SfAlEIIEHT.
7. WARR.\NlY
A. IN NlDmON 10 THE _RAHIY ON ,IU COHSIIlUC11QN CO\ItRED IN THE CONIIl.<r
OOCUoIEKIS 1l1E CONIIlAC11lR SHAU. REP~R ,IU _ AND REP"~ AREA BACK I>S ClOSE
111 OllIC:lNAL COHDlI10N I>S POSSiIlI.E 111 lEASE NIEA PROPtRTY OR SURRO\JNOINC
CAUSal BY CONSTRUCTION.
S. SllII.. S1EIlIIJV.llON APPlJCATION WU GUAANn'EE IlECETAllON FIlE[ ROAD ""D SITE NIEAS
FOR ONE _ ~ OATE OF FINAL INSPEeno".
C. 0ISIURIlED ARFIlS WIU. REfUX:r CROWtH OF NEW CRASS CXWER I'fltOIl 111 FlIW. IHSI'€CTION.
D.I.IlHOSCAPINC. IF IHa.UDED WlTlflN 1l1E SCOPE OF THE CONTIlACT. WIlL BE GUAIWIlEEO FOR
ONE _ FIlOII O/\TE or FINAL llISPECTION.
PNIT 2 0ElI0UT10H
1. IlEIoIOUI1ON SHAI.l. BE COHIROU.EO 111 f'RE\IUfT 1l1E 5l'REAO OF OUST TO OCCUPIED PORTIONS
OR THE llUI.DIHll.
2. ElCISI1HC WORt< 11l ROIAIH SIIW. lIE PROTECTED FROII -. WORK llAM'(;ED BY
CClNIRNmlR ~ K REPN~ED III MATCIl EXISllNC WORK.
J. liT THE DlO OF 60CH _I( OAY NIO _ IHCUloIalT _THER. Cl.OSE ,IU EXTERIOR
0PEHlIlCS WIlH WEA1IlERPI\OOf' COYER. .
4. _ _ _ RU8lllSH ~ THE SITE OoIlI.Y. 00 N01 AU.OW llEIlRIS NlD flUS81SH
10 IlCCUIIUlAlE IN IIUIlDlNO OR ON SITE.
5. fOR f'lOOR AND WAU. PEIlE1RAllONS:
A. CClNIRNmlR lIUST UlCo\TE RElNFORClNCl BARS IN EX1SI1NG Fl.OOR svas VSltG A ~ELIASl.E
_-DUIRUCTM!: mmNG IIUHOO APPRfNED BY THE OWNER. CORE llRIl.L I>S NECESSM'Y
TO NJ.t1II CASU: PENElRATlOH WITHOUf CUllING ElCISI1HC RElNFORCINC BARS.
a. Fll OPEMIIC mtR CABLE INSTALlATION WITH INSTA-FOMl'S IHSfA-RRE SEAL S1lACOHE
RIV f'OAII.
PAIIf 3 PllOOUCIS
I. lIATERtALS
A. SOlI. SIERIUZUIS
tor.... ICK.I. PAOOUCT 1\0 - EPA ID292-7 AIoIBUSH HmIlICIllt - EPA REGISTERED
_ CORPORAllON - INDUSTRIAl. PROOUClS
1'.0. BOK 5123 1435 lIORIllS AVE.
~. II 4a128 lEI. 3'3 S83-lIOClO UNION. ~ D7Da3 TEl llOO 528-4i24
a. ROAD AHIl SITE MATalIILS SIW.l. CONF'OAM 111 VA DOT IlONl AND
SPECIF1CIlTlONS ,jAIl. \ 1114 WHEN REF'EREIICm 111 Fll MATERw.. -
.occEPTASU: SE1LCT Fll SHAU. BE II AOCORDANCE WITH VA OOT
IlEPNllUEHT OF PUIIUC tRAHSPORl'ATlON SfANOARll SPEClFICAllON.
C. SOL SlERIUZER SIW.I. BE EPA REGISTERED 01' LIQUID CONPOSmOH AHO 01
PRE EIIERGENCt llt5lGH.
D. SOlI. SfAalZER F_ SHAU. BE IIIW1 - 500X
2. EQUIPIIE)If
A. COIM'ACl'IOH ~ BE ACCOIIPUSHED BY IIECIW/lCIll _So
l.l.ORCER AREAS SIW.l. IE COlotPACTED IN SHW'S FOOT _lIIR 011 RUBSER tiRED
ROU.fIlS WElGHIIlG AT LEAST FNE TONS.
2. SIMI1.ER AREAS ~ lIE COIIPACTED lit l'OWER-lJRI\IElI, IWI) HaD WolPER$.
PART 4 EXlCI1IlOH
\ . IIISPECT10NS
I.OCIl. __ IHSPtCTORS SIIW. lIE HOIlFIED NO USS llWf 4a HOURS IN ADII,,"ct
OF COHCllE1'E POURS. UNLESS atlERWlSE SPEC1f1EO lit OWNER OIl I.OCIl. JURlSIllCllOH.
2. PREPNlATION
A. CU'NI 1IlEES. IRUSII AND 0llIRIS FIlllII SI1E NlEAS AND ACCESS ROAD _ OF WAY
I>S llIREC1'ED lit PIlO.IECT -.
S.PllIOR TO OTHER EXCAVAI10H AND CONSlRUCI1OH EmlRlS CRUB ORCAHIe MATERIAl. TO A
M~ OF SIX IICIfIS IlELOW 0IlIGlHAI. GROUND LEVa
C.UNIfSS IHSIRUCTEO BY PRO.IECT IIANotGER tRAHSPORr AU. REIlCMD TREE.
IIRUSIl AND FIlllII lHE PROPERlY 11l AN AlIIHOIIIZED 1Nl0F1LL..
D.PRIOR OF FU. 011 SASE lIAlERtALS. \IOU. 1l1E SOlI..
E. WHERE UHSf-'lll.E SOlI. (:OIlOII1OIIS ARE EIlOOUKltREO. UHE OF THE GRU88ED AREAS
WITH STAllllZER lIAT PRIOR TO PIACOlEIIr OF FlU. OIl SASE MATEIlIN...
:l. IHS1'AUIlllON
A.THE SITE AND _ NlEAS SHAU. BE Ar THE SUB-IJASE COURSE ELtVAllON PfllOR
'Ill F'OAMtHCl fOUHOAIlONS. ~ OIl FU. THE SITE AND ACCESS ROAD REQUIRED IN 0II0EJl
_T UPON EYEIl 0ISlR1IIUIl0II OF SPCII.S RESULnllG FROloI FOUNDATION EXCAVAnOHS.
IIC RESULtIHC _ WlU. _ WIIN SAID sue-BASE COURSE. ELtVAIlONS ARE
111 lIE: CIoI..CUlATED 1'1IOII FIHISHED _ OIl SLOPES IHClCATED.
a. F _. EXCESS SPClS WU IE ClEAAED ~ J08 SI1E AND NOr SPRDD 8tl'OHD THE
UIoIIS or !mE PROPUlIY UILESS AII1\IDRIZE BY PROJECT IINWl€R II>S .oGI\aIIENT
BY lNfOClWHEII.
C. THE ACCESS IlONl SIW.l. IE IIROUCHI' 111 SASE COURSE ELtVATlON PRlOll 111 FOUI4~llON
COIlSIRUCI1ON TO PERIIIr USE. COl4PN::llOH AND OIISaIVAIlOH OURlNG COHSlll\JCl1Oll OF
THE SITE.
D.AYOlO CREIltlHG DEPRESSIONS WHERE WIllER MAY POND.
E. THE COHIIVCT SHNJ. lIE ASSUMED 111 INCWOE CRAOINC _. DlTCH1NCl AND UIUSS
ClTHERW!SE lHOICATED. CCMRIHG '!YjQ IHClIES OF SURFACE COUIlSE. ,IU IlOo'IlS 011 ROUTES
UIIJZED fOIl ACCESS 111 litE SITE COIIW[HCINC #oJ THE POINT OF INIERSECTlON WITH litE
HENIf:Sf PUSUC THOROIJQHf'ARE.
F. WHEN IIIPROWC NI ElClSllIIC ACCESS 1lONl. GRADE 1l1E EXISI1HC ROAD TO REIIO'IE _
ORCAHIe lIATTElI _ SIoIOO1H THE SURFACE IlEFOIIE P\.OCINC Fll OIl SIllNE.
G. PIX:E Fll 011 SlONE II SOl tlCH IoIAlIIIIUII _ CO\IPACT IlEI'ORE P\.OCING NEXT UFT.
H. THE FINISH ClllAOE. INCWOINC TOP SURfACE COURSE. ~ EXlEHD A llIHl11UII OF ONE
FOOT IIEYOND litE SITE FENCE AHO SHAU. COVER lItE AREA I>S INDICATED.
L RlPIW' SIIW. IE IlPPUtll TO THE SlOE SlOPES OF AU. FENCED SITE AREAS. PAJlJ(1HC
NIElS. NIIJ 111 ,IU OTHER SlOPES G\l(/llER llWf 2:1.
J. RlPRAP SIIW. IE APPUEO 111 1l1E SlOES OF DITCHES OIl llflNtW;t SWAl!S.
X. _ EHllRE OIICH /'OIl SIX FEET IN AU. OiRECIlONS liT CULVERT OPEllIHGS.
I.. SEED FtRI1UWl AND SIllAW CO'IER SIW.l. lIE APPUEtl TO AU. OTHER DlS'l\JRSEtl AREAS.
_ OIlCMES. 0fIAIIW:E. SWAI.ES. NOr CI1HERWISE RlPRAPPED.
II. UNIlEIl NO ClRCUIISfNICES 'MLL DlTCIlE5. SWAlfS, NOR CUlVDIIS BE PlACED so THEY
DIRECT WATER TlIWNIDS, OR PER\lIT SfAHOlHC WATER 1...mu.TElY ADJACENT 111 RHUlOH)
1lAUAST. If' OIl D.EVA'I1OHS COHFIJCT WITH litIS CUlIlAHCE ....VAR SHOUI.O BE
AIMSED
N.IN DITCH IS G\l(/lTER lM.IH tEN PERCOI1'. 1I0UNO 0l\IERS1ONARY
HEoIOW..u5 AT CULIImT EHlRAHCES. lIiE HOOW,IU SHAU. BE POSIllONEtl
AT AN ANGLE NO GREATER lM.IH eo DECftEES OFf' THE DITCH UNE. ~IPIW' tHE UPSTREA\I
SlOE or THE MlWlWAI.l. I>S WEl.I. I>S lItE OIICH FOR SIX FEET AlIOI/E THE CULvERT
EHIlWICE.
DIVISION 3: CONCRETE WORKS-033l0
1. QUAIJJY ASSURANCE:
COIIPl.Y WITH _ OF THE F'OU.OW1N<: CODES. SPECIFlCAnONS NlD SfANIlAROS.
EXCEPT WHERE _ STRIHC(HT REQUIREllEIITS ARE SHOWN OR SPECIFIED:
A. M:1 301-811 "SPECF1tAllON FOIl SlllUCTURAI. CONCRElE FOR SUILDINCS'.
a.AC1 31S "Su1UllNG CODE RtClUlREIIEKIS FOR REf<FORCED CONCREIE' (R€v'ISEtl Iln)
_ AC131S-119 'COIIIlEHTNlY" (REVISEIl 1 U21
c. CONCRETE 1lEIHf'ORCIHC SlEEI. INSlII\/lE (CRSI . "NAHUN.. Of' Sf_D PRACTlCE".
:l. REINF'OIlCIHG IIAlERIALSl
A. RlENFORCtNG:ASfU A SI5.GIlAOE eo OUORNED.
a. __ WIllE FA8RlC:ASIIoI A 1" WElJlED SlEEI. WIllE rAIIRIC.
C. SIJPPORIS FQR RElHFORCDIEHT:1IOlSlEll5. CHAIRS. sPACERS ,,"0 01llER OEYlCES FOR
SPACING. SuPPORT1NC AND REIHF'ORCINC BARS IN Pl..<GE. USE W1IlE llAA TYPE SUPPOIII'S
CRSI ~ sPEC1f1CAllONS.
:l. COHCIlEIE .llAl'ERlN..S:
A. PORItAHO CE\IEIffi A$III C 150. lYPE 1.
8. UGHtWElGHT _GATES: ASIII C 330
C.NR~ AIl\lIXIURE: A$IIIC 2eo CER'l1FIED lit lItE ~FACIIJRER TO BE
COMPATIILE MIH OTHER REQUIRED AO\lIltIUIlES.
4. ___ _ IlESICH OF 1I1llES:
OESICH MIX 111 PR(MOE UGHtWElGHT CONcRETE WItH THE F'OU.OWlHC PROPERI1ES:
A. SOOO PSI 28-oAY COl.tPRESSl'IE SI1lEHGTM
.._: 110 PCF.
Co W/C RATIO: 0."" IlAlOIIUII ~ NR-ENTIlNHED). 0.35 ~ (NR-EI/IllIlINED)
DIVISION 4: UNIT MASONRY-04220
1. CONCRETE Ill.OQ(S:
A. SfANOollO IIlOC1C SIW.l. BE TNt SIZE INOICATED ON 1l1E OflAWINGS. UClIfT _'lOR
HfUIRN. COI.OII. NIO SHN.L CONf1)Rll 111 THE REQUlREIIEKIS OF ASIII C ~. lYPE 1.
CRAOE N. UClf1WE1(1HT lYPE WIlH EXPAHIl su.G ACCRECATE.
2. ~:':OR1'AR f'OR CONCRETE 8LDCKS SH.<I.L CONfOIIII 10 AST" C Z70. TYPE S AHO
SIWl. HAVE A COIlAAES$NE STRENCTH OF 3000 PSI IN 28 OAYS.
3. WIRE RElNFORClNC IN lIED JOINIS:
A. TRUSli. l\'PE RElNFORCDIEHT SHAI.l. BE OUR-O-WALl.., OR EOIJ,OL FAIlRICATED wrrn A
S1NCl.E PN~ 01' SlOt _ CQNI1NUOUS 0lAC0NAl. CROSS-1lOOS SPA(;[O NOT "OIIE THAN
S" ON CfNIER. WIRE IN FAIIRlCAllON ~ BE CAl.VNllED ACCORDING TO A$III I1S.
Q.<SS 3. SlOE IlOOS SIWL BE I (lAC[ 3/'.' IIIHWIl UJjGTH SHAU. BE 10'-0' WfTll
MA1CIlIHG CORNER _ lEE UHITS.
S. SPAClHC: 'I\'PlCAI.. IN SED JOINf'S. AT 16' 'IERIICAl. INTERVAl.. CT 0PENlNCS: /oJ!/fNE NlD
Co AT OPENINGS: _ NlO mow r.ACH OPENING PIX:E RElNf'ORC1NC IN ONE AOOITlONAl
JOINT TO EXIDlD 3' -<j" PAST THE OPENING FIlCH WAY. $PUCE I.EHCTMS FOR MORfZONT....
JOINT RElNFORCEIIENT SIW.l. BE AT LEAST SO f'OR tRUSS ,,"0 16' FOR SlR.tJCHT l\'PE.
4. IHSTAU. SlEEI. UNmS __ r.ACH OPE/<IHO. FU. CORIS W11H GIlOU1' 3 COURSES SEl.OW
UHTU. 8EoIRIHC.
DIVISION 5: STRUCTURAl STEEL-05120
1. QUALITY I>SSURAHCE:
COIIP\.Y wrrn _IONS 01' THE FOU.OW1NG CODES. SPECIFICATIONS ,,"0 Sf,,"ONlOS.
EXCEPT WHERE IoIOllE STR_ REO\J1REIIEHl$ ARE SHOWN OR SPECIFIED:
A. NSC 'CODE OF SfNlONlO PRACIlCE".
8.. NSC "SPEClFlCAllON FQR SlRUCIIJIW. srm. BUIlDINGS - ,lUOW-'lll.E STRESS
IIESIGH AND P\ASI1C DESI(;H'. IN!:LlJDlNIl lItE 'COIIIIENTNlY" AND SUPPlfllEIITS.
C. ...ERICAH WElO1HG SOClElY (AW$) O'.I-i2. "srRul:IIJlw. WE1.OING CODE - STEEL.'
2. :"='RAI. SlEEI. PlATES. SlW'ES AND lIARS: ASIII A 341.
8. HIGH $lRENGfM THRrAOED FASIEHOlS: A$III A 325.
C. mcmoocs FOR llUD1NG: E?OJOt
D. AU. SfIlIJ(:JIJPA. srm. SHAI.l. BE CAl.VAHIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A$TIoI A 153.
E. CEIIEHT GROUT: E\IIlECO BY IIASIER 8U1LOERS OF "" APPROVED EQU"I.
r. _-IIETN.LJC. _-RESISTNfl'. 4000 PSI COIIPtlESSNE S'TRDIG1H CIlOOr.
PllCMllt ONE or 1l1E F'OU.OW1HG 011 AN APPROVED EOUAL;
1. EUCO N.s. BY EUCUO CHE\lICAI. CO.
2.1lASTERIUlW 713 BY \lASTER BUIlDERS
DIVISION 7: SEAlANTS AND CAULKING-07900
1. f'R(MO[ JOINT' S&Il.ERS. JOWl' FUDlS AND OTHER RElATED IofAlERWS _r ARt:
COIlPATIIU WIIN ONE IlHOTHER ""0 iIIIIf JOWl' SUllSlIlAlES VNOEll CONOIIlONS or
SEIMCE NlD ~1lONS. PRlMDE COlDRS 111 lIATCH ADJACENT SURfACE$. PROV1OE
fI.ACl( OR OTHER HEI/l'IlII. COUlR WHEN 110 OIH€R COlOR IS AV.vaE.,
2. OHE-oclIIPOHENT POI"IS~Ul11t IIASED. ONE PNIT ElASfOllERIC SEAlANl'. COIIPt.l1HG WITH
~-=~~~":.:~A~~~~~
Of' APPflOVAI.. PRClVIOE ONE OF THE F'Ol1.OWIHll OR "" __ ECII.w..:
A. F\.EXlSEAI. eoo SERIES BY DAP. ING.
a. MORMfUX ONE - COIIPOHENr BY W.R. GIIACE .. CO.
3. ONE-lXIIIPClHDlT IlCR'tIJC SEAlAIlT: IlCIMJC lERPOl.'I'IIER. SOLVENT BASED ONE-PAIIf
t\lERIIOPIASl1C Sf.OlNlT OOIIPOUHD. SOUOS NOr LESS lM.IH 15" ACIlIUC, COIIPl.l1HG WITH
~ TT -$-00230. ClASS 8 t'lPE II, fOR PER111ETtR (W IIU.... _ DOOR FRAIlES.
1HRESHOLDS AT ElClE\tIOR DOORS. ANI) PIPE SUEVES t\fIOUCM EXrolIOR WAU.S AND FLOOR
SlAIIS. ,_ ONE 01 THE _ 01 NI APPROVED EQUAl;
A. IlH' ACR'tIJC IN DAP. INC.
a. t;N;O 1>S-3 lit GAlES ENGINEERING/SIIC
4. ~tT~~.~~~~~ ~";'~'r%.~:WC:-Y1~ ~'IED
ElltJ.<U
A. VIJl.CAIEX rr W.R. GIIACE .. CO.
DIVISION 8:
METAL DOORS & FRAMES-08ll0
1. PROWl[ 000llS _ F_IS COIIPI.Y1NG WITH STEEl. DOOR INSlII\/lE .RECO....ENDEQ
SPECIFICAtiONS f'OR SfANIlARGS SlEEI. DOOR AND FRAIlES' (SOl 100). AIIO I>S HEREIN
SPEClFlEll.
2. SUIlllIT SHOP ORAWlNGS FOR THE FAIlRlCAT10H AND ERECllON OF HOWlW ..El'.... DOORS
AND FRANES. INClUDE DETAIlS or EACH FRAIo1E lYPE. EllVAnoHS or DOOR OESlCN TYPES.
CONOIT1ONS AT OPENINGS. DETNl.S OF COHStRUCI1OH.
1.OCA11OH "'10 IHSfAUAnoN REQUIROIEIlIS OF FINISH MARIlWARE ,,"0 RElNFORCEIIENT.
AND DETNlS OF JOINT CONNECTIONS. SHOW ANCHORAGE AND ACCESSORY 1fDlS.
3. WIiERE flRE-RATED DOOR ASSEMIIUES ARE IHIlICATED 011 REQUIRED. PROIIlOE FI~E-RA1Ell
DOOR AND FRAIlE ASSEIIIlue; _T COIlPl.Y WITH NFPA 80 "Sf_D FO~ FIRE DOORS AND
WINOOWS'. _ .....'IE SEEN 'IESTEO. USIED NIO lAIlELED IN ACCOROAHCE WITH AS1M E 152
"SfANONIll lIETHOOS OF FIRE TESIS OF DOOR ASSEII8IJES' BY A HAI1OHAU.Y RECOGNIZED
INDEPENDENT lESTIHG _ IHSPECI10H ACENCY ACCEPTAlll.E TO AVlHOIlfT1ES HAVING
JIJRlSOlCI1ON.
4. NOr -1lOLW) SIEEl. SHEEIS AND STRlP: COIlMERCIAI. QUAUtY CARBON srm.. P1CKl!1l ,,"0
OIlED. COIIPI.YING WITH ASIII A 559 AHO ASIII A. see.
5. COLD-ROu.ED SIEEl. SHEETS: COIlIolERClAl. QUAU1Y CAABON STEEL. COMPl'tINC WITH
AS1M A 383 AND ASIII A 558.
S. SUPPOl!TS _ ANCHORS: FAIIRlCATE OF NOr USS THAN IS (lAC[ SHttr ma..
7. INSERI'S. SOllS NIlI FI>SIU<ERS: IlAHUFACTIJRE'S Sf,,"IlARD UNITS COIIPl.'/1NG WITH
A$TIoI A 153. ClASS C OR 0 I>S APPUCIl8LE.
8. SIlOP-APPPUEO PAINT: FOR SlEB. SlJAl'ACts USE RVSf -INHISfINE ENAllEl. OR PAINT.
EITHER AlR-DR'/INC OIl 8Al<1HG. SUITAlII.E I>S A IlASE FOR SPECIf'1EO FINISH P-'lNIS.
9. FAIlA1CATE MOUDW tolET.... UHIIS 111 BE RIOlO. NEAT IH APPEAIWiCE AND FREE FROII
DEF!C1S. WARP 011 BUCKlE. WMEREVER I'RACT\C.OI.. FIr AHO I>SSElotllLE VHITS IN THE
1IAIIJf. GRIND AND IlAKE SMOOTH.
Fl.USH AND IJMSIlll.E. IlEl'AWC fUER TO CONCEAl. IlAHUF
ACCEPT-"IX.E.
'O.CCIofPI.Y.'IR1i SOl-HIO REQUIREIlEHTS AS :
GIlAOE . '. Hf'/lVV DUlY. lIOOEl 1. lllMlIIU.. 18 (lAC[ FACES.
II.EXPOSEO.FASIENERS: UNlESS OTHERWISE INllICAlUI. PI\<MDE COUNTER$VHK FlAr
PHIWPSOll JACKSON _ FOR EXPOSED SCREWS ,,"0 BOLlS.
I2.FlNlSJlIMDWNlE PREPNlAlIOH: __ HOWIW \lET.... UNITS TO RECEIVE IlOR'TISE AND
CQNCUII.P FINISH 1lAROWNIE. 1NCWlJ1HG CUTOUI'S. RElNf'ORCINC. IlR1UJNC NlD TAPPINC
It ACCOIIIlNICE WItH FINAl. _ _ARE SCHEDULE AND lEIIPlAlES PROVIDED BY
IW/i1WNIf. SlIPPUER. COIlPl.y lIIIH ~ REQUI/lEI<<HrS or ANSI A 115
"SPEI:flCfoT1ONS fOR DOOR _ FRAIl[ PREPNlA1lON'.
13. Pf\()VlOE STEEl. REINFORCING AT HINGES IN NGl.l.OW IIETAL UNITS TO BE 7 GAGE
. 10 1/2' . WIDTH RECICJI~ED.
14. AAOVIDE HOll.OW ..ET.... DOORS or lllE TYPES INDICATED ON THE DRAWIHGS AND
CDIIPl.Y1NG wITH SOI-loo ..INIIIU" IIATERw.s NlD CONSTRUCTION REQUIRElAENTS.
15. PROVIDE HOll.OW 1IEl'.... F_ES OF lItE TYPES AND STYlLS INDlCATEO ON THE DRAWINGS
ANO COMPlYING WITH SOl .00. PflOVICE I. GAGE: FRAIlES lor INTERIOR lOCAtiONS.
NOTE: DOOR SHAll. 8E OPERAIlLE FO~ EXI11NG FIlOII tHE INSIDE WfTHlJUT tHE USE OF A
~EY OR IoN'( OTHE~ sPECIAl. OEVICE.
--
NOT IlEl.lA$Q)
~1l' .
..., ~ CRDWM!~~
YCOMMUNICATIONS ~
375 SOU1HPOlIIlE 1ll.\1l.
CAHONStlJRQ, PA 15317
(7241 4'11-2000
('/24) 4111-2200 FAX
oIU._NCl'IIIIIEN_CllHf_
MEREIH ARE THE PROPERlY OF ENl/IMWt
NIl lI/ol' Ill!' lIE oo..IJ'.l1tll, USlJI CJllllSl1Dllll
WIIHOUT lItE _ COISENr (W __
Owl...... Solutio.s
SOUlliEAST REGION
'0" AV1AT1OII P_Y
8UI11! 100
MORItI8V1UE. He 21511II
_(111)_
_~9)_
IlflEASE
IlllE
5/15/00
Vt/oo
_FOlI_
_FCJl_
IlatSSIPfll_
IlatSSIPfll_
Rr:.lSIII_HEJIlHT
!HIS _ IS COPlIWlIfIED Nfl IS II<< lOl.E
f'Illlf'OlIY or II<[ OWNER. <<IS P1IOOUCEIl
SllllI.YflIlUS[f//11lEOMONIlIIS.ofJUI1tS.
IIIl'IlOIII.l:I CJl US[ " IllS _ NCI/OR
1HE__COli1'~lIlflS~
WIIHOUrIME__"IME_
DRAWN /1'(: CHS
CHECKED IN: BTM
Ism:-
CARROLL CREEK
DU R.R.ER.
Ism:NJlIl!ER
CVR-362B
I SITE AOOREss
THOMAS .JEFFERSON PKWY.
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22tO:
I SHEEl' TTlI.E
GENERAL NOTES &
I SHEET NU"BER
C-1
I Pl.Ql' SCAI.E:
(
WOOl. OE'SCRlPTlON fOR LfA5( PMCa
COMMEHCINC AT A POllIT ON M NOR1lUI.Y RlClHT-ot"-w.y OF STAlE ROUfE ~,
vNWaL WIDTM, SAID POINT ~ THE SOI1ntIAS'IEIlH wosr PllCPEIl'N CORNEll
OF JWU$ L. LhtLY. .MI.. \lEEIl BOOIC1460 PHIE 214, TAlC II/IP' 13-$:lC;
1HEIU 20202' H.OHG THE SHD IIOU'IE ~ 1llllHT-Clf-WAY AHD THE IJoNOS OF flOIIERT 8.
II CNlQLYN P. SWEENY to A I;Ol<<:Rf;'IE HQlWA.Y UONUlIDfl': TllQICE CONl1NUlNG
'IHIIOI,IGll THE IN40S OF tAlll swm<< Sll%'03'0S"t 212.11' to NI 11IOII PIN
'UT AT M TlIU[ ~ OF 1lE0000000P.0.s. '1):
nENCE 1+44'30'43'. 51.$1' to NI IRON PIM SET: 1ltENCt M04'04'$2"t
au.' to NI IROM PIN SEf: TIIENCE "'SS'OI'( 121.00' to NI IRON
PIN SET: TlIPlCE S04"04'52~ 12&.00' to NI IRON PI! SEf: 1llENCt
NSSSS'Q8'W ,0.2&' TIlE POINf'OF IlGINNC toIIfMIHG 14.747 SQt.WtE
FEr OF l.W), 8EJIlG SI'IIlATm II sconSVllU ~ DISlRICT.
ALlIDMlllE CIOUHlY, ~
/.
I
I
\
/
/
(
/
- 1NOli:A'ffi _~1KAT NlEfllOII.1Itl:OIlO6
AHD;l1OI' NWaf'.D 014 1IfC GIlOUIID.
~-~. u:...sE PARCEL.
"
"
/
PAlicrL I
N/r
J(FfRcY IJ. ANoeRSON
"liVE: H. ANOfRSON
\ 0.8. ,.96 PC. 668
J- TAX.I 9J-5J8
ZONE:O.. 1!4
_ _ _ _~o use:. VACANT ,
T i ----'__.j
I I
I I
PARCa 2
N/F
"IILIUS L. L1VCL Y. JR.
0.8. ,.50 PC. 2T.
TAX .I 9J-5JC
ZONeO.. RA
LAND USE:: ReSlOeNTlAL
"
."
\
"
"
/
\
\
\ ----- /'''
\...--..;- -- "
--------~~~~~ -- -- -- J L
~~ ~~ =-- ---.
, ~ ~ ::=-....
" ........ ....., ~-_. ,
"",-,:,..., '- ' ~ ~ ' .... "',,' ,
. ~ "''' \........ "''':''''~' "',:1- ........",,/
1~~, ',,- ~< ,',-:::~:-~:- :.--,.----
..t:-1..~ " '" ..~:: ~::.....:::~'::... .....:----.
", 'f~' ,,"-...::11',,',.... '.. " ..,---.
~~"', ,:"'~>:-:'> '::.::.-.--.
~J''''J'' ""<<~~~,,>-....; ,./
BEARING
N.O.~8.C...w
'\\/
, ,
'\ '\
" /'
y\/
___J L'___
lEGAL llISCAIP110N fllR 20' ACCESS\unulY tASDlOIT
CQlAIOItlIlC AT AN IlION PIN SEf AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PRClPOSUl
lEASE PMCEI.: TlIENCt SlI5'SS'OI"t 17.82' TO THE 11l\JE POINT OF
BEGlHNNCl(P.Q.8. '2);
'IHEHCt WITlI TIlE CDITEJIUNE OF THE 2ft NXDS\utMY fASElIENT 23.51'
AUlIlG TIlE ARC OF A 15.00' IWllUS CUlM: to TIlE IHT HAWlG A CHORD
llEAAING AHD OISTN<<:E OF N40',.'04~ 21.2$ TO A PQNT: THENCE
NM"01'01"W 6US' TO A POINT: lHfJlCE NU'28'~"W 41.40' to "
POINT; 1HEIU NllO'03'II~ eo.ol' to A POINf: fHEHC[ N7Y41'24"W
11.40' TO A POINT; TlIOICE ""OI'2I~ 21.7' TO A POINT ON THE
IIOIITlIEI\\.Y RlGIl1'...Of'-WAY OF STA'll IlOUTE ~ AND IIEING THE ENO OF TIlE
20' ACCESS\UTlJlY EASEIIENT. HAVlIICl A TOrAL IDIGTl1 OF 311'.
ROBERT B, & CAROLYNP. SWEENY
. 519.118 ACRES
REt.lAINING FROM RECORD
f/iX'/94-17
-
~ ~ ----
=;r; ~~ _ _
~~=.
ROBERT B. & CAROLYN ~EENY
519.118 ACRES
REMAINING FROM RECORD
.TAX , 94-17
10Nal: ~
lAND US"':;:'T \
,./
. 04'0.-
PARCfL J
N/F
JULIIIS L. LML Y. JR.
0.8 '.50 PC. 11.
TA~ot<gJ-;"JO
/ANa USE:: VAC4NT
NOTES:
I. 0WlIERS OF. llEQORII: II08ERT B II CAAOUNE P. swaIllY
2_ lECW..llEFEM'MCE: WlU. lIOCllC lOOOO( PNlE lOOOOl.
.1. TAlC W# .....at. 17..14 .
4. PlIOPEIl1Y 1$ ZC*m: M..
5. vumc:AL."TUII~'.
&. ~. If.~ 10. VIROINIA. irATE CIllO. .
7. ~ irATE .QQ). SOUlM ZONE.
a. llU. .........,." IROVKlED TO
'Ne __ NO'llU! IlEPORr Will
F\lIlIIIHID "~_-.TllEIltiAY BE
~ I'.Illlf'U1't NOT .... HEREON.
I. ~ r:::.--ce:t "" f'OIlEII co: l'flONE __..,..3000. '
:~: ~1liss.inI/f't' ~~~~~1Nc:
CONSlRIJClIOrl. . .
12. PIlQI'aIlY 1S\.OCA1m" r.t,...A.. FI.llOO ZONE 'l:" AS POI
FlOOO IiW' lIllM A CllIIUI.NIY-PNIEL IMlllER OF .510001I 037$ B
WITH AN EPRCTI\IE DA'll OF llECDIIIER ". lIao.
CURvE OATA
RADIUS ARC TANGENT CHORD
1 ~.oo' 23.59' I ~.OJ' 21.23'
\
)
CURvE
Cl
DELTA
90'05'~J"
N/F
CHAineS f. JR. .. ANNI( I. ouRReR
iJ8 IJI7 PC. JO
Ti'X I gJ-5JE:
lONE:O: RA
UlNO USf:: ReSllJCNTlAL /'
(
PA1ICCl. 2 "
JWIJS /.. ~r. JR. /
0.8./4$0 I'(;. 2/4 ,,-.. _'__
TU~iM5JC /'.
~. ,,"
~----- /
"'-- -- - -+-
'-------- - ---/ ------
'.-- -- ---L --- --
~-- --.......,.,. -..- ~-- --
.......... ..J - 7"- P_ -- --__
- .,.J".. UTlL. POI.[ -- ,. ~ -- - .
-',' ........ QoI42 --.::::"~ ---. __. -- -:.
..., -=,.-=.. -- --
~. <'o~)l... -=------~---~I~ -- .. ~.
,~fJ5I.-i("'- ~2'__ -: -=-- 0;/' I~ 15' .~
~" ~, . _~ __ --..: r~~!.? v~
-~-,....." -- -- --
~~ . ,.--;-- - --
~ -,. - --
'" . -,.
.. . :---,. --
................. \ '\ ........ ~~ ....
........... ..........,..... ~. VHC \ "'--..,; ........ ......,:
.................................~ ,.
'-,..... ..
"....., ...........
'.... "
'~ """'" ""',,'-'::
~.. " "
" " .CI.. "-
, ..... ~~~'
'" ", ~""
" "k "
, , ,
'" ", ~ "
,
,
..
,
,
,
,
" ,
" "
.", '-',
" "
, ,.
,
,
.....
--.
------.----...-.
I
I
--
I
I
/'
--
---
--
-
--
IWICEl. J
N/F
JWIJS /... tM.'l.r. JR.
AS. 1#S11. PG. 214
IlW I fS-1SJD
ZriNlD: 8A
I.4ND 1lSe. IIlCWT
--
~_ I
Af'PIlOll.' Ulc\11ON .
;m~ rAtEllENT.AS
.::-..u= ~~, ~ . . I
DATm NJC. 2. 117& I I
L
--
--
--
--
--
-- '. ,.
--;;: --
-
--.
.-
--
--
--
------.J
,
,
...............
.,
-
-- -- --
-
...........
SUIM:l' SHOWING
BOU~ FlIOlI RECORDS AND
AND ~~= =1If)IT
SITE I: '.M 3&2."8-
SITE ~ DURRER
Sl1\lAlm ON TIlE
PIlOPER1Y Of
ROBERT B. ..t CAAOLYN .P. SWEENEY
WILL llOO!I~"AI;.f:.XXXJOO(
RO\Itt ~
SCOTlSVll.LE.1oWlISTt1lW. 0lSI1l1CT
ALllEIWlI.E 'COUNlY, '<I1lG1M1A
s~ \l-~.
JOB 1OOROO121
...
_ SCHmuLI:
00iCIIIPTKlN
FlRST _
LlHD US[. CANOl'\' HQ:Ht
At:'o1SED .- PAACO.
__ TlIU' I<[IGHIS
,
DATE
00312000
III 23/2000
01 1/2000
07 1 2000
\ se5'
\
"
\\\
'...." ~
, v'
"...,..2'...~'
~" TllU. "
..........
......
.............-~~...
, .
"
: 11\,
,
..,
""'"
",
'.
'..,
..~--
",,....'"
"
,
'"
----
---
---- .20
ROBERT B. ac kVYN P. SWEENY
519.11 ACRES
ROIAINtlG IlB:llllO
TAl(' ....,1
ZoNED: .
\NIl USE: VN:;ANT
.......~....
"
...........
'.
..,
........
"
'..
"
"
".
......--......--.--
'..,
",
",
"
"
",
(
" ,
'">'''
" " '"
. .",. ",
. ,
- ,
" ,
.:".': ';.,
).,<
"
nLV.-417.J9
t
S
I" ~
,I ~
J ~
- -)~
t
(\
) \
. \
~
II
. DETAA. ~ ..1- . 25'
TEl.: ~~8~54Q-772-lIG$O
801.~at... '....., ;. '-. .. e~t ~40I'
.-.- ...
.--
.:' . ~.
'. .' iT..:-....~.~.. . .,...
. . -. ~
'; ~;'
-:'.' \ . .~i.:...
.. '.
'.:~ ~.
.- .,.,~
. .
(
(
(
8
"-
~
/
,
,
\
/
,
,
/
/
/
/
,
/
/
,~....
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
,\
/,
// '\
/
/
,
,
\
,
,
1
PARCEl. 2
N/F Y. JR
JUUUS fso UVfJG. . 214
D,~Ax" 1I.1-:s.ic
ZON~~/IoV.
lAND USE:
1I8.8T~ 10 EQUIPIlEHT
519.11~CR~~
REMAI~~NG, ~-17
Of PROPOSED go'
= lIOIIOPOll
lR/TOH PCS (10"1JJ PAD
COHCRElE EClUlPt.I
RFOUIREMENTS
MIN. SETBACK
SIDES:' 25:
REAR: 35
tCIlCRO UlG 'IWJ(If~~AmWII
-""'-
_wor-.
-
\ (
J------~,,' ";:"'
./ .... ~ .1JfjfS,fso ~ #4
I _/~~
I / -:..:- ~
o-J L~ -;;;: ,;;;_,;,; ,;,; ~ __
....
~
....
~
....
~
....
""
....
....
(""---
PARCEl. I
N/F ANDERSON
JUF11D' il.A f11S0N
JUUF: H. AND
DB. 1496 PC. 668
. TAx I 9.1-538
ZONF:D: RA
lAND USF:: RF:S/DF:N/IoV.
)
I
I
---
---
go' FALl. RADIUS
./
./~
./
\
)
519.11~RO~!t~O
RD/AI~~, 94-17
ZONED: RA IPASTURE
lAND USE: RESIDENTW.
./ N/F _
'LES F:. JR. ~ ANNIE I. DU
CHAR 8. 1.11l PC.:SO
D.. /9.1-5.1F:
-ZONED: RA
WID USE: RF:SIDENIIAL /
,
\\
\
'1 'r
/
/
/
(\
~
100 _0
1"=100'~
---~ L
--
---
---
---
SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1.-100'
--
.---.........
100
,
"-.....
'-......,
'-......,
'-......,
'-......,
.........
DATE:
,,, I~I/ I
~.l. CRDlMv /~_
Y COMMUNICATIONS
SQUlHPOtNTE IIl.VO.
~. PA 15317
(7241411-20002200 fAX
(724 .11-
I/AllIlIIl. CONTNNED
.tU IIflAWIIIGS NfIJ =.m Of ENCINEER
HEREIN HOT NlE IIElHEOOPUC\1!D. usmorQlt:::Jf
=.:: lHE WII11!.N CONSOl1 .
.fd.wireless S~lutions
',.
SOUTHEAST REGION
101& AVIATlON P.-AY
SUITE 100
MOARlSVlU.E. Nt 27seG
_:(81el_1M2lI
_(1l181_7
ISSUED FOR _
ISSOOl FOR lOlUoC
_PER_
RlWE _ HT PER C/IOIIII
_PERCDN
_ _ HlICHT
NCl IS ll<[ SOl[
1HIS_IS~rrISPIIOllUCfI)
PROPERlY Of M . lie ~ .omJIIlS.
SOlII.yFQltU51:IIr*:':s_Ml/OII
~QltU51: ",01S_
M INf0Rll>.1lON ~ or * _
WIlHO\/IlHE WIllI1Dl
DRAWN 1lY: CHS
CHECKED 1lY: 81M
ISlIt-
CARROL CREEK
DUR.R.ER.
I SlIt NU_
CVR-362B
I SITE AOOIlESS
THOMASJEFFE~~:~2
CHARLOTTESVI ,
I SHEET mu:
I SHEET NUYSER
C-3
I PLOT $CAlL
1_1IXl I
(
(
(.
~
2
~
~
!l
~
::-
~
~
~
f
i
------ O/;,
----
O/;, _______
---------------~~-~
.--~o~~----------------1
o/; I
r-:~~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
..
,
kl
I
I
I
125'-0'
I '-';-~-,--T'~)<..,..._'T-~""""c;r__X'..,.;.;'t'_
(!) EXISTING Q. """ .
- - ----" - - ----- ~.!~ - -
CfNTE/l or PROPOSEll 90'
WOOOEN lIONOI'OU:
n'-S'
Li:::I 1RmlN PCS
"Bl ICE BRJOGE
EXISTING '2". OAK
52' TAlL CD
PROPOSED TDoIPOIWlY TREE
PR01EC11ON FENCE
(TYPlCAL) ~
\Bl
I
,
/
'\.
"
"
"
~~
~i
"
~~
~
"
-Q V- ClUSTER 1lI0UNT (lYP.)
SECTOR 2
ANTENNA ..
AZIIlIUTH 27 ~ 82'
IW) CENTER SECTOR 1
ANTENNA
~~82'
"
"
llQIE: Cl.OCKW1SE FlIOII TRUE NORlll.
1. AZlllUTHS IiIE. ORIENTAle) ROI'OSal AIllENNA RAD CENTER
2. COIITR.\CTOR ~ VERI~ON PCS PRIOR 10 INST"lI.AllON
AND ORlENTAl1ONS WIIIt
or ANTENNAS.
ANTENNA MOUNT /ORIE;NTATlON DETAIL
~
~
Q(J
EXISTING 10'. OAK
S3' TAlLQ)
EXISTING 18.. OAK(!)
70' TAlL
~
~
TRITON PCS (10'.12') ,.ft
CONCREIE EQUIPMENt p_
= :il (10'dO')
200 SF,
TRIroN Pes H-fRAIIE
IlETtR STANO
,
I
I ?
..
:::!
I
,
I
I
I
._---~
, I
'~ . :
. \.-------- I
I ----------.---J
80'-3' I
-
. ~
"
SITE DETAIL PLAN
"
10 0
"-10' r--....--
10
I
"
EXISTING UTIUTY POLE Rt 19
OIlE ___
---- OIlE ____
OIlE ___
PlAN NOTE,
CD EXISTING TREE SHAll BE
1 PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
mllRAWlNQ
NOT REU'ASED
":'" /<>>
. . - CRDWN~!~!~
W COMMUNICATIONS ~
~~ ~~;7
(7241 416-2000
(724 416-2200 FAX
ou. DftAYOHGS ~ ~m:~~
.::~~ =- IE Dl.fWIIIl. LQD OIllECLOSlll
WIlHOUT lItE WRIITEIl QlHSOO IJF elQNElll
0"'''''0" Solution.
SOUTHEAST REGION
'010 AVlAT10H PNOf!I/AY
SUITE 100
MORRlsw.~ NO 275llO
_191Ql__
Fp:(Q,Q)-*7
RlWS(
~1E
5/1~00
1/1/00
ISSJED FOR 11('IO
ISSlO FOR _
_POlCllO'llN
Rt'.ISE_HTPOlCAOWN
_POlCllO'llN
.100 1REE HIlCllIli
---
1HS _ IS COPlJlIQ<lB) Nfl 1$ lItE SOLE
PROPERlY IJF lliE 0WIf[R. IT IS PftOOUC[!)
~OIlBrJ::":s 'It:a~
JH[ INI'~l1OIf CONlAtl(l) 1M R is RlRIIIlIl!lI
WIlHOUl JH[ 'IIIll1l[ll _ a 1\l[ __
ORAWN 11I': CHS
CHECKED BY: BTM
I SITE NolIE
CARROLL CREEK
Dl..J~~ER
I SITE I\\JIlll[1l
CVR.362B
I SITE AOORrSS
THOMAS JEFFERSON PKWY"
CHARLOnESVILLE. VA 2290,
I SHE!;\' mu:
SITE DEl AIL PlAN
I SHEET HUll8E1l
C-4
IPI.OT~
,-I
[ PlOT SCAU::
c-s
[ SHEET NUMBER
! SHEU 11TLE
THOMAS JEFFERSON PKWY.
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VA 22902
]
~E ADORESS
CVR-362B
[Sl1[NUIlll(R
CARROLL CREEK
DLJR.R.ER.
!Sl1[_
QRAWN BY: CHS
Cl<ECKEO BY: 8TM
THS_ISCOI'11llGNl[OAIIlISMSOlE
PROPERlY OF 1I<E QWNEIl. IT IS PIlQC)UC[D
9;ULY fOR USE I/( 1\[ llIl(Jl NlO ~ AFruIltS.
REPROOUCIlON OIl US[ or !HIS 0R.lIIINC AIIl/Ol
ll<E ..r0All/01lON CQNf.oMD IN IT IS ~
'OI1ltOUTll<EllRlTT!II_orll<E_
Rf:'olSID POl CROWN
Rl\lS( 11lIER lIT POl CROIfl
Rf:'olSID POl CROWN
Rf:'olSIDTOIIEllHElGllT
R(WS[
1)All:
5/15/00 ISSWl rOIl Rt\O
&/1/00 ISSOO) fOIl ZONIIG
o."oIoSS S.luti.ns
SOUTHEAST REGION
1015AWlTIONPARKWAY
SUITE 700
MORRlSVIlU. He 27580
_(818)--
F""'(818)_7
All. DRA-.s ANI) WRlT1IIl WA1DIII. CQHToIINfD
H!RElN ME THE PROPEIllY Of' ENClNEER
NlO WAY NOr lIE -.cAflIl. lml OIl OISCUJS(D
WIlltQUl 114E WNl1EII COH5lJlf OF _fER.
375 $OUlHPCIIlTE BlW.
CN<<)NSIIUAO. PA 15317
(7241 4111-2000
(724 4111-ZIOO fill/.
\....!~I CRDWN'-3~-
~-COMMUN~noNS '
1
flNAI. 1lRAv.lG
NOT RELEASED
CCHS1RUC1lClN
OAfEi
t
;l
~ I
~
~
* @~
---
VIEW
I
~I ELEVATION VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
.......
'"
liQ1E:
1. If lWE COWPOUND IS CLOSE TO A ROAO WHERE lWERE IS A POSSlBIU1Y
THAT Nff EQUIPMENT CAH BE SEEH. AODmONAL lNIDSCAPING IS REQUIRED
AND THE CONCRETE PAD MUST BE l1NTED (NOT PAINTED) _.
FllUND'TlON
TRITON PCS CABINET
PAINTED BROWN (EARTH TONE)
.
~v
~
b
...
~I i
5:
l:>
j:;j
~I ::c
w
w
I:!:
w
w
I!:
io 0 ( i"J
... <0
GO
11 11
II ....
s: .... I
l:> I l:>
j:;j l:> 0
:J: W :J:
:J:
W W
W W w
a:: w a::
.... a:: ....
....
b
. I
0 ~
I 0> PI AN NOTE:
b
0> 11 <D HEIGHT. OF PROPOSED WOOD MONOPOLE
e 11 a SHAll BE NO GREATER THAN 7' ABOVE
w g ~ TALlEST TREE WITHIN A 25' RADIUS OF
.... THE PROPOSED CEIlTERUNE OF THE
0 l:> WOOD t.IONOPOLE.
z j:;j z
w :J: Z
0-
W . a:: :J:
Vl .w l:>
b .... :J
z
I w l:>
0 U Z
0> 0 B
00( ::l
a:: u
U
.... Vl !;
:J: U
l:> 0- s:
W
:J: Z '"
g j:;j
0:: :J:
w a::
~ .... a::
0 w
w ~
Vl
0
0. -'
0 ~
0::
0- W
>
0
2 SECTOR TRITON PCS
CLUSTER MOUNT ANTENNAS
(flUSH MOUNT) PAlN'TED
BROWN (fARTH TONE) ~
(-
\,
<:'"
'\
:a
'"
~ I~
it
s:
Cl
W
:x:
w
w
0:
....
~
...
(
(
(-
(
(
~
~
l
~
i
:ll
~
~
,
i
Ii
~
~
t
y
0'
\.
)
\
\
\
\
\,
y
:;,
!:-y
..
'"
g
---
'"
"
""
v
;:,
"
,
"
,
':.
"
,
,
!
\ r---~'-
\ I EXIS11N~ DRIVE
\, \
t\ \
I \ "
,
..
/
,~
\
~
".
i
/
\
l
\
\
I,
\
/
/
\
'"
I
I
'"
" ,J
"
I ",
t
I
"
'-.
"
,
"
I
''t
I
"
",
"
t
I
.,~ ",
I '.
"
".......... r
""~"'"
',- '....
" '
" '
'.... '
" "-
" "
,
"
.......
"
"
",
./;/
"
",
(>-~H(..~'OH~'~OHE "" "-
..7 ~
..
"'
----
OkE <,'0
" ~
... "..... ........_OHE 4~1
, , ,------ " '"
.......~_________..::.::;_ Oke '.... ~22
" " ""::-:--~"--- -
", Okt~----- ~
0;'-
PROPOSED
20' WIDE
ACCESS/UTlutY
~ElAEkf
/
_ .,l.;'J
-~
I
I
-,
/
(
I
I
,~ I
-'-"-'T~~~ ./
/ EXIS11N~ci.lJ('l - ,.,.~
-_-r--~'!..m 1
I --
cEHlER OF PIlPPOSEO go' I
WOODEN IIONqPOlE
I
J
EXlS11~G 12"' OAK
80' T.op.
\
\
\
"
"
',-
"
EXIS11NG )4"' OAK
83' Tm "
'-,
EXIS11NG 12"' OAK
52' Tm
"
".
"
'"
".
"
"
PROPOSED ~ l1lEE
~ '"
, ~ "
'. ~ .....
" '
'-, PROPOSED TRITON ~ ~
" IolETER STAtIO ' ,
", "
,
'-- I
r--
,
,
'"
~ 10"' OAK
83' T.olL -..
-..
",
",
'.
PROPOSED
12' WIllE
ACCESS RCW)
-'...,
EXIS11NG 18"' OAK --
70' Tm '
!'Rf)POSED TRIlON pes
(\ll'd.~") coNCRETE
, EOutPlolE)lr...P~
, f'R()P05ED TRITON Pes"
, w& N(rJo. (10'1110') '"
,_ 200 sr. '"
'" "
'" '"
'..
,
".
"
'"
,
-'"
,
,
"
,
,
,
"
I
I
'" 'r "- ,
'"
,
"
"
,
"
".
"
,
,
"-
,
'"
"-
'"
'"
'"
"-
'"
'"
,
'"
, '"
"
'"
"
,
"
"
",
"
",
"
"
,
I
I
" 1
"
"
I'
I "
"", , 1
, ,I.
',,- I,
", I
................... .......... "-
............ '.... ......... I
, "'. '"
- - -~ - - - - :'~- - --1"',
",- ......... ..... " '-.,
'" '
"- '
,
"
'"
,
,
:'-.
"
"
'"
'"
'"
"-
'"
,
,
"
"
",
'"
"
"
,
,
',~
, '~"',
".
"
,
,
"
'"
"
,
...:,
,
,
"
,
,
,
,
,
"
"
"
,
,
"
"
,
,
,
,
,
'.
'"
"
, ""
, '-..
~,
-''''If:..-_
'. ',-
'.
'"
"
"
"
".
'.
'-.
,
".
"
'-.
'"
".
'~
"-
"
"
"
"
"
,
'^'
"
,
"
"
"
"-
"
".
'"
'"
'"
"
"'..;"s
"
".
'"
",
"
"
,
'-.
"
'"
GRADING PLAN
'"
SCALE: 1"=10'
'-.
".
?'",
o
10
..::.:l
"
1".10' I~
'//
'/
o
.llQIE;
1. THE GIW)E Of THE ENTIRE SITE
IS LESS lHAN 25,.. SLOPE
'.
".
.0122
.__ ._ __ _ - 421
.- ._- --.
':;;'.,
~l":',
':'2')
f1NM. ~
N01' MItASQ)
fOR CONS1'R\lCIlllN
GAtt: l/flf>>
~. itl,CRDWN~~k..
W- COMMUNICATIONS . ~
375 SOUlHPOIllt 11.'0'0.
<WlOM-. PA 1113'7
(724) 4111-2O!lO
(n4) 41t-UOO ,~
AU. 0R/0IfIlIICS NCl 'OlllflOl ...- COHTMO
HEREIN AAE THE PRoPERTY or ENGINEER
NCl .., I<<l! lIE {AI'IJCA1IIl. USIlI OIl lIISQOSDl
WITHOUT THE WRIITEN CQ<5f;Nl ~ -
0......55 Sol~"o..
SOUTHEAST REGION
101IAVlAT1ONP~AY
SUITE 100
MORRJSVIUJ!. Ne 27ll4lO
_:(911)_211
F..:(9II)--
, IlEIEASE
I GATE
5/'5/1>>
1/'/1>>
1
1
ISSIJEDFCRRl\O
ISSIJEDFCRZOIIIIll
IIllWION5 1
I NO. POTE 1
1 1/23/1>> Rl\OSlD PER ~
1/21/1>> __H1'PER~
1f7/1>> Rl\OSlD PER ~
1/12/1>> KJI,J 1R!t tDlIflS
1/1/1>> Rl\OSlD - -
IllS _ IS Q)PI1IIGHIED NlJ IS IHE sou:
PAOl'[R1Y OF !HE -. "IS PlICllllC(l)
lllULY fal USE WI 11€ 0IIe NClIlS -
R[PtDlUC1OI OIl USE ~ IllS ~ /H)/11I
I1<E __ CONWIED II " IS ~
lIllHOUIIHEWIlIlIlII_orlHE--
OR,t.WN BY: CHS
CHECKal BY: BTU
ISllEtWiE
CARROLL CREEK
CURRER
I SlIE NUIIIER
]
CVR-362B
~nt AOORESS
:J
THOMAS JEFFERSON PKWY.
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22902
I SHEET mu:
]
GRADING PLAN
I SHEET NUU&E/l
J
C-6
[ PlOT SCALE:
1_10 I
~
~
I
CO 1
,.
~
I
~
f '",
I
I "'
R
~
(
(,
CABINET
CONCRm PAD
WWf'0.0-W2,9112.9.1I10 DEPTH
0"
.. "
. ... .. .
J" CL
\ '-0"
~~4'S
J" CI.ENl
(lYP.)
EQUIPMENT SUPPORT PAD DETAIL (10'x12')
\0'-0"
@
:....
1. 'e' . JOOO PSI, Fy . 80 kol
2. FOOTING TO EXTEND " IIIN...UII Of' 12" BELOW UNDISTURBED SOIL AHO
fROST LINE,
J. f1HIIL SITE OESIGH IS TH[ /lESPOHSJBlUIY or THE SITE CONTRACTOR,
4. SI.-'8 FOUNOo\TlON DESIGNED "SSUlaNG ALl.OWAlll.E SOIL BEAAING
PRESSlJRE Of' 2000 P$r,
5. SI.-'8 f'OUNOo\TlON OESlGl<ED "SSUlIING lII\XlilUII Pl/ISllCITY INDEX Of' 27.
0, TINT CONCRETE: _ONE
! CONCRETE PAD DETAIL & CROSS SECTION
;;;-
SUIlGlWlE
TRITON PCS CABINET
P.NNTED BROWN (ENllH TONE)
EDGE Of
CONCRETE
3
ICE BRIDGE
POSTS (lYP,)
til
o
.'
ICE BRIDGE
?
..,
L
:,
I
;.,
ElIW'I/DIT .
i'AiIHEt/ / ,.
;.,
5'-0" I
.
-'
10'-0'
CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD LAYOUT
2 WAVE GUIDE BRIDGE DETAIL
WOOOEN MONOPOL.E
@
~
...
"
~
PANEL ANTENNA
lolICROI'lECT TRl-BRACKET
PN!r I B 1 B2B OR EQUAL
lIlIE;
1. CONTRACTOR SHm 'lERFY SIZE Of' BRACKET
REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
2. PANEL ANTENtlAS TO BE FUJSH MOUNTED TO
wooo POLE.
3. ANTENNA DIMENSIONS H.W.O. 44.7.0.3".2.7"
BI-BRACKET MOUNT DETAIL
1-
24'
.1
J-I/2" OIA. METAl POSTS EMBEDDED
IN CONCRETE INSTmED PER
MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS
o
o
.4: _111_111,111_
~III~I! 11111l,Jl" ,!
1~1'
o
,
;.,
WIE:
1. PIPE COLUMNS, WA'lEGUIOE CHANNEL,
AND PIPE HOO AS MANUfACT1JRED ev
IoOVANCED UGHTNING TECHNOLOGY.
2. CONNECT EACH SUPPORT L.EG TO
GROVND RING
3. CABL.E SUPPORT SPACING EVERY J' -0"
4. COORDINATE CABLE ROUTE ANO
INSTAllATION WITH CABINET,
..
!I
~
ON'A TR-5
MECHANICAl OQWNTILT BRACKET
ANO ON'A FIX B05
PIPE MOUNT BRACKET
PANEL ANTENNA \
MICROruCT PIPE MOUNT J
PART I 818B2 OR EQUAl
MICROfLECT TRI-BRACKET
PART , 81828 OR EQUAl
FENCE POSTS MAY BE 4"' PINE
OR 2"' OAK
ORANGE UV-RESlSTANT HIGH TENSILE
STRENGTH POLY BARRICAOE FABRIC
5 TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL
~
1. PROTECTION Of EXISTING VEGETATION:
rAT THE START Of GRADING INVOLVING THE
~~~I::~PI~~ ~~5f1~~~~E C~. OU~OS:J:,EE
VER11CAL CUT SHALl. BE MAIlE AT THE EDGE OF
4' MIN ri:6s~~Ecr..~0"t~~u~~ ~E'N~~~~,OTHER i
THE TREE PROTECTION fENCING SHALL BE
INSTAlL.ED ON THE SlOE Of' THE CUT FARTHEST
"WAY fROM THE TREE TRUNK AND SHAlL REIMIN
IN PWE UNTIL m CONSTRuCTION IN THE VICINITY
PLETt. . NO. ST~ OF
MATERIALS, FILL. OR E
SHm BE AlLOWED WITHIN THE BOUNOAR'f Of' THE
P~OTECTED AREA.
2. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL AT A IW)IUS EQUAL
TO I' IW)'US/l" OIAMETER Of TREE TO RE"""N,
'"- ~/CRDW~~~
w- COMMUNICATIONS
375 sountPOlIIlE "'0'0.
CNIONSIIIIIIG, "" 1113\7
(72414'&-2000
(724 41&-UOO FAX
OI.l_MJ__QllIIIMQ
HEREIN NlE THE ~ OF EHC1NEIR
N<<I IW NlJf lit lU'IJCAItD. U5Ill 1II IIISaOlm
WI1llOUT 1l€ WII11UI CllHSDf1' (If _
Gwl....... S'''..ns
SOUTHEAST REGION
'015 AVlATlON PNOCWAY
illITE 7QIl
~LU!.NC:zrMO
_(Vl')~
r-':(Vll1l_
1
IIlEoISE
1lo\1E
S/'5/OO I$SUEIl f'OIl __
5/'/00 I$SUEIl f1IR _
~
NO. Illlt
.& 5/ZJ/OO
7/1/00
8/9/00
_PUIC11OllN
_ PUI QQOIl
_ 1\lIIlIl HEIGHT
lIfIS _ IS COl'IIIIJlIm N<<I IS lIE SOl!
PI!OI'EII!Y (If !If[ _ If IS PllIlWaD
SOULY FOI USE BY 1Hl: _ N<<I lIS NJIJoIt!S.
RfPllOIIUCIlOHORUSE(lfllflS_>W.I/OR
lIE IIFOIlNAllON COHJIlN(!) II It IS FOll1lIIlOEIl
II1MOUITllE__(1fTllE_
_WI< /I'{, CHS
CHECKED BY: 8TM
4
ISIIE_ I
CARROLL CREEK
DURRER
ISIIE-
. CVR-3628
I SITE ~ORl:$S
THOMAS JEFFERSON PKWY.
CHARLOneSVlLLE, VA 2290:
I SHEET mu:
SITE ELEVATIONS
I SHEEt' NUMllOl
C-7
6
I PlOY ~
30
1\
~
T
....
I
SCAL~~ IN FEET
'..
c,
. ~~:..~
SE
SECTION 94
106
RIVANNA AN 0
SCALE IN FEET
,
\.
\.
\"
;~
./ ~,
"
.'
/
/
/
c_
(
ATTACHMENT B
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
ATTACHMENT B
USGS Quadrangal Topography Map
Scale: I" = 2000'
CvR-362B
. Durrer. Site
_,__.;c-,:_2~' - ATTACHMENT]
('- -
.~
I
~
t
\<r.
-:J '
, .
-:-'~l
.....i
i
'.
o
ATTACHMENT C
~
r""
CVR 362B
Route 53 headed east
Top of balloon at 82'
33
October 19, 2000
Doug Bruce
Roudabush, Gale & Associate
914 Monticello Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: SP-2000-47 Pantops Convenience Center
SDP-2000-92 Pantops Convenience Center Preliminary Site Plan - Waiver
Tax Map 78, Parcel 76
Dear Mr. Bruce:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on October 17, 2000, unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted special use permit application to the Board of
Supervisors.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and
receive public comment at their meeting on November 8, 2000. Any new or additional
information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date. .
The Commission also approved a waiver to allow one-way circulation [4,12.6.1] and a waiver to
allow one-way ingress and egress [4.12,6.1].
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sinq~rely ,
>' .
.i,... ~,. /' t:.-..:
~",< _ >. ;i.Jv'
/-~.~--'~
Ted Glass
Planner
TG/jcf
Cc:
Ella Carey
Jack Kelsey
Bob Ball
Amelia McCulley
Steve Allshouse
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
TED GLASS
OCTOBER 17, 2000
NOVEMBER 8,2000
SP-2000-047.. SDP 2000-092 P ANTOPS CONVENIENCE CENTER
Applicant's Proposal: The Applicant is requesting a special use permit to operate a single-lane drive-
through restaurant pick-up window on Rolkin Road at Route 250 on Pantops. This use is proposed to be
adjacent to a single one-way through lane and an adjacent proposed car wash facility. Additionally, the
applicant is requesting a waiver to allow one-way circulation and a waiver to allow one-way ingress and
egress. The site is currently vacant. The principal building (containing the drive-through window) is
proposed to house a 3,200 square foot restaurant (with drive-thru window), a 2,958 square foot food store
(with fuel sales from 12 fuel dispensers under two overhead canopies), and a 2,880 square foot second
floor office. The proposed Car Wash buHding is approximately 600 square feet. The Site Review
Committee has reviewed the site plan (SDP 00-092) and has identified that a Special Use Permit for a
drive-through window and waivers for one-way circulation and for one-way ingress and egress are
required. With Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors approval of the Special Use Permit and
Planning Commission approval of the waivers, SDP 00...092 can be approved administratively.
Petition: Request for a special use permit, in accord with the provisions of Section 22.2.2.10 of the
Zoning Ordinance, to operate a restaurant with a single-lane, drive-up window facility on approximately
68,842 square feet ofland at the southwest corner of Route 250 East and Rolkin Road. Request for
waivers to allow one-way circulation and one-way ingress and egress in accord with sections 4.12.6.2
and 4.12,6.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. The property, described as Tax Map 78 Parcel 76, is'located in
the Rivanna Magisterial District. The property is zoned PDMC, Planned Development Mixed
Commercial, and EC, Entrance Corridor Overlay District" and is designated as Regional Service in
Neighborhood 3 of the Comprehensive Plan, A site plan showing proposed development of the property
has been submitted,
Character of the Area: This site is situated in a developing commercial area. The site is bounded by
Route 250 on the north, Rolkin Road on the east, and is an outparcel of the proposed PDMC
development (site plan submitted as "Kroger" site) to the south and west. Properties situated to the
south, east and west are zoned for commercial use, A convenience store/gas station stands to the east
across Rolkin Road. The parcels to the south and west are vacant.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and the
Comprehensive Plan and recommends approval of SP 00-092. Staff also recommends approval of the
waiver to allow one-way circulation [4.12.6.1] and approval of the waiver to allow one-way ingress and
egress [4.12,6.1].
Plannin2 and Zonin2 Historv:
This site is an outparcel of the "Kroger Store at Pantops" site that was rezoned to PDMC (Planned
Development - Mixed Commercial); HC (Highway Commercial) and EC (Entrance Corridor) with
ZMA-98-20 on October 21, 1998. The "Kroger Store at Pantops" final site development plan (SDP 2000-
123) is currently under review.
Comprehensive Plan:
,~,
This site is recommended for Regional Service in Neighborhood 3 of the Comprehensive Plan. The
Comprehensive Plan identifies regional-scale commercial, regional malls, medical centers, mixed-use
developments, professional, interstate interchange developments and corporate offices providing retail,
wholesale, business, and/or employment services to Albemarle County and the region,
STAFF COMMENT:
Drive-through facilities are permitted by special use permit only due to concerns regarding access and
circulation patterns, combined with high traffic volumes. Staff comments on each provision of Section
31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance are outlined below.
The Board of Supervisors herebv reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits permitted
hereunder. Special use permits for uses as orovided in this ordinance mav be issued upon a finding bv
the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adiacent property"
The adjacent properties to the south and west are zoned for commercial (PDMC) use. The existing
property to the east is a similar convenience store/gas station use. The proposed use is not expected to be
a detriment to these properties.
that the character of the district will not be changed thereby,
The nature of the use is consistent with the commercial zoning in the area and will not change the
character of the district.
'---",
and that such use will be in harmony with the pw:pose and intent of this ordinance,
Section 1.4 of the Ordinance includes the provision of convenient access, reduction or prevention of
congestion in the public streets, provision of adequate transportation, and protection against danger or
congestion in travel and transportation as purposes and intents, which are relevant to this application.
The applicant has revised the original submittal to allow for a one-way in only from Rolkin Road,
eliminating an in and out entrance. This change was made to satisfy concerns of VDOT that vehicles
leaving the site and entering Rolkin Road may have caused conflicts with weaving across three lanes for
U and left turns, or by vehicles attempting to make a crossing maneuver through the crossover.
Additionally, the site has been redesigned internally to give entering vehicles more room to maneuver,
thereby reducing the possibility of traffic stacking into Rolkin Road and, ultimately, into Richmond
Road (Route 250). .
The site has been designed with an internal one-way bypass lane to alleviate possible congestion in the
vicinity of the drive-through window and car wash. The applicant has indicated that the drive-through
window has been designed so that the vehicles being served will be oriented away from Route 250, so
that headlight glare will not be a problem,
This site is in the Entrance Corridor and will be reviewed by the Architectural Review Board, No
submittal has been made for ARB review as of the date of this report.
,.-.,.,
2
with the uses oermitted bv right in the district.
This type of use is consistent with other permitted commercial uses in the district.
with additional regulations orovided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance"
There are no additional regulations in Section 5.0 specifically addressing drive-through facilities.
and with the -public health, safety and general welfare.
The review of the site plan will insure that the public health, safety and welfare are met as to physical
development.
Waiver Requests:
Waiver to allow One-Wav Circulation:
Section 4.12.6,2 of the Zoning Ordinance encourages unobstructed access ways for emergency vehicles, and
separation of public parking spaces from service areas, The Planning Commission may approve one-way
circulation in such cases where the same is necessitated by the peculiar character of the site or the proposed
use, The applicant proposes to construct a one-way travelway to serve both the drive-through window and
the car wash. The applicant's request and justification is attached (Attachment C), The one-way travelway
appears to be of adequate width to allow unimpeded flow for traffic. Seperate travelways are provided along
the left for the drive-through window and along the right for the car wash. The Engineering department has
reviewed this request and recommends approval. (Attachment D). Planning staff notes that the proposed
pavement markings and traffic control devices appear adequate to control access to the proposed one-way
through lane. Therefore, with Engineering's recommendation, Planning recommends approval.
Waiver to allow one-wav ingress and egress:
Section 4,12.6,1 of the Zoning Ordinance states that "One-way ingress and egress shall not be permitted,
except that the commission may approve one-way ingress and egress in such case where the same is
necessitated by the peculiar character of the proposed use or site, In such case, the commission shall require
installation and maintenance of control devices such as signage, pavement markings and physical barriers
as deemed reasonable to provide direction to and policing of vehicular movement." The applicant's request
and justification for the waiver to allow one-way ingress and egress is attached (Attachment C). The
Planning Department has determined that this request is consistent with the traffic patterns occasioned by
the request for one-way circulation and by the Engineering Department's and Virginia Department of
Transportation's requirement that the access from Rolkin Road be one-way in only. With the proposed
signage, pavement markings and physical barriers, this request appears to meet the requirements for
modification as outlined above. Staff recommends approval of this request.
3
SUMMARY:
~.
Staffhas identified the following factors that are favorable to this request:
1. The nature of the use is consistent with the commercial zoning and use in the area.
2. The use is consistent with other permitted commercial uses in the district.
3. The use should not result in a substantial detrime,nt to adjacent property.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval of SP-2000-047. Staff also recommends approval of the waiver to allow
one...way circulation [4,12,6.1] and approval of the waiver to allow one-way ingress and egress [4.12.6.1].
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Tax Map and Location Map
B - Site Plan Reduction
C - Engineering Department memo dated 9/18/00
D- SP Application letter
E - Waiver Requests letter
~
r--..
4
UN
,y
.:':'"' - -- c,'\''>'
I .,..... ~
I u~,
I
I
I
-[
~IN" ~. '
1."..
IJ
ATTACHMENT A
---------
"'0 AUCXE:ASIIILL.1O
/ :~"
, ~ , a ;> .~,
-..........~ ~ '{ :;
6oW~
, -.~
~1 "'='""
/~
,.y .,.
,,'-.
;.,....,......;;-.-
----...
"-
,,,>
-'-~-
<:"
~
....~
;;;
---
'-.,
-"e
....
...
::
~~
0/,
~.1I
~
/
'0.
,,"
,~~
_-i-':-
~ ,_:~
, - ~
5
#':' ;)..l:',n...::I..l
~~
57 1---
i.
/j
,,/"
....OI'/TrCELLQ
22
~
/
/
...
---
SCA.l[ ,N .:tE"!"
...
:l2
S COTTSVI LLE AND
RIVANNA DISTRICTS
SECTION 78/--
6
(-.
(-
(
~
,-;
SITE DA TA
TAX MAP DESIGNATION: TMP 78-76
LEGAL REFERENCE: 08 1944. p.173
(p,181 plat - survey by B. Aubrey Huffman and Associates, Ltd.)
ZONING: PDM~ ENTRANCE CORRIDOR ZMA-98-20. SP 2000-047
OWNER I> OEVELOPER:
VIRGINIA OIL COMPANY. INC.
1300 HARRIS STREET
CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22903
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: RIVANNA
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED BY ROUDABUSH, GALE
AND ASSOCIATES ON JULY 16. 2000.
JP ANT OJP S
CONVlENffiNClE ClENTER
CHARLOTTESVILLE
l'
~
,p'; 'l,~
; ~
,,0; 'l'
.,
u.s. 250
-9./'(';):;
~"t>
"'0
I I PAN TOPS
SHOPP I NG <t
CENTER '#iG
~\""~
,
, ,
I!
$'Or/I".y.-o
.....'"
~
'"
"
SITE
."
r'
L-
"'NN~
'(.~
--\
'\.
~
i;
; i
STA TE
FARM
INS
HDG TRS
VICINITY MAP
SCAI. E: 1" = 1000'
GENERAL WATER AND SEWER CONDITIONS
fln_ J8f1lary 27. 1998
1. Work shall be subject to Insoection by the Albemarle County
Service Authority in9pector9, The contractor will be
responsible for notifying the proper service authority
off icial9 at the start of the work.
2. The location of existing util1tiesacross the line of
the prop0ged work are not neceS9ar il y shown on the plans
and where 9hown. are only approximately correct. The
contractor shall on his own initiative locate ell
underground lines and structures as necessary,
3. All meterials and construction shall comply with General
W8te,. and Sewer Construction Specifications a9 adopted
by the Albemarle County Service Authority on January 1S, 1998.
4. Datum for all elevation shown in National Geodetic Survey.
S, The contractor shall be resposible for notlf ing
"Miss Utiltity" (1-800-552-7001),
" 411 watar and .h.l1 hau. -<
3 feet nfcover measured from the top of pipe. over the
centerline of the pipe. Thi9 includes all fire hydrant
1 ines. service laterals and waterl ines. etc,
7 ,All water and sewer appurtenances are to be located
outside of roadSide ditches.
8, Valves on deadend line9 9Mll be rOddeo to provide adequate
restraint for the valve during a future extension of the line,
.<)
'l>"
rt
~~
s'~~
j
fill!
j
DA ruM REFERENCE: 8ENCHMARK ON PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FOR ., THE KROGER
STORE AT PANTOPS" [NAIL FOUND IN THE BACK OF SIDEWALK ON NOBTH SIDE OF
RT 250. DIRECTLY OPPOSITE HANSON ROAD], ELEVATION 521.91.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL SLOPES (> 25%) ON THIS SITE,
THIS SITE DOES NOT LIE IN A RESERVOIR WATERSHED,
THIS SITE LIES OUTSIOE OF THE 100-YEAR AND .500-YEAR FLOOD BOUNOARIES. AS
SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 510006 0240 8.
EFFECTIVE DATE DECEMBER 16, 1980.
PLANNEO MAXIMUM NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES PER SHIFT = 8.
MAIN BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 54.6 FT (8ASED ON SEC 18-21.41.
PUMP CANOPY HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 44,3 FT (BASED ON SEC IB-21.4) ,
CARWASH BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 65 FT (BASED ON SEC 18-21.4).
EACH OUTDOOR LUMINAIRE EQUIPPED WITH A LAMP WHICH EMITS ~ 000 OR
MORE INITIAL LUMENS SHALL BE A FULL CUTOFF LUMINAIRE OR A DECORATIVE
LUMINAIRE WITH FULL CUTOFF OPTICS.
THE SPILLOVER OF LIGHTING FROM PARKING AREA LUMINAIRES ONTO PUBLIC
ROADS AND PROPERTY IN RESIDENTIAL OR RURAL AREAS ZONING DISTRICTS
SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE-HALF (1/2) FOOT CANDLE.
PARKING LOT PAVING SPECIFICATIONS:
6" 121A AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL
2.5" BM2
1 5" SM2A
DUMPSTER PAD PAVING SPECIFICATIONS:
5" PLAIN PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE
SM2A
BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES SHALL BE PLACED ON BOTH WATER LINES.
':1
~v~
TO [-64
LAND USE SCHEDULE~~
PROPOSED USES AND PARKING SCHEDULE
TYPE EXISl ING % PROPOSED %
BUILDINGS 0 Sf 0% 7,281 sf 10%
PA VED 0 sf 0% 49, 951 sf 73%
OPEN 68. 842 sf 100% 11.610 sf 17%
TOTAL 68. 842 sf JOO% 68, 842 sf 100%
JIJI Area within the Rolkin Rd access easement is not
included in land use schedule calculations, per
determinatlon of Jan Sprinkle at May 1 meeting,
USE
GROSS FtOOR AREA
PARKING SPACES REQUIRED
RESTAURANT (tOWER LEVELl
FOOD STORE (tOWER LEVELl
OFFICE SPACE (UPPER LEVEL)
A TT AC'HMF.NT R
3.200 sf 13 sp per 1000 sf = 41.6 sp
~ 958 sf 1 sp per 200 sf = 14,B sp
~ BBO sf (~304 net)JI 1 sp per 200 sf = 11.5 sp
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: 6B sp
JI net office area = O.BO of gross floor area; Cf. Sec. lB-4, 12.6,6
63 STANDARD PARKING SP PROVIDED ON SITE ~ 63 sp
24 FUEL DISPENSER SP ~ 1 PARKING SP I 4 OISPENSER SP = 6 sp
TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 69 sp
ALBEMARLE COUNTY ENGINEERING
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR SITE PLANS
I. Prior to commencement of any construction within any existing
pUblic right-of-way. including connection to any existing road,
B permit shall be obtained from the YirginiB Department or
Transportation (V,D,Q,T.), This plan as drawn may not a.:urately
reflect the requirements of the permit, Where Bny discrerancies
occur the requirements of the permit shall govern.
2. All paving, drainage related materials and construction mHthods
9hall conform to current specifications and 9tandards of I,P,O, T.
unless otherwise noted.
3. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be prOvil1ed .tn accordance
with the approved erosion control plan and shall be installed
prior to any clearing. grading or other construction,
4, All slopes and disturbed areas are to be fertilized, seed.'d and
mulched, The maximium allowable slope is 2: 1 (~orizontal:,erticall '
Where reasonably obtainable. lesser slopes of 4: 1 or bett"r are
to be achieved.
S, Paved. rip-rap or stabilization mat lined ditch mav be re'.1uired
when in the opinion of the Albemarle County Director of
Engineering, or the Director's designee. it is deemed nec.,ssary
in order to stabilize a drainage channel.
6. All traffiC control signs Shall conform with the VirQinia
Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
7. Unless otherwise noted al) concrete pipe shal) be reinfor",:ed
concrete pipe - Class III.
8. All excavation for underground pipe installation must com"lY With
OSHA Standards for the Construct ion Industry (2g CFR Part 19261.
APPROVAL
Il'PT, Of PLANNING
& ClJlMJNITY Il'V
VIRGINIA Il'PT. OF HIGtIIAYS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER MET .
SITE PLAN ,.
LAN1SCAPE PLAN
OEPL OF
"""'N A ~PT ~~.. 'If
Il'PL OF ZONING
ALBEMARLE COIJlTY
SERVICE AUTHORITY
ALBEMARLE COOHTY FIRE OFFICIAL
AllfJWlE COlMY llJlLOINlIFFICIAl
.m
. MET 1/3
. MET 2/3
. MET 3/3
~
cJ ~:E
~~~8.
cn~ ~~ Hi
~~ ~ ~~.~::>
Q, <(.. ~~
Cl ll:Ul ,O:@)
c: 00 >.S!
tn ~ G.l ~~
~ ~ ~u; ~I
'l( 0<( ~,
cld ~ ~~ ~~
~ ~ ~: ~i
o ~ (jj~ ~~
..:;j Ul~ o~
::r:= CI) III l :l '
tn . 11... ~8
~~ 0:> ~.liI
~ W ~~ ~~
Q ~ <(Ul :!liI
~ <.? "'!!
o~lEI~
~ CliI 0.
IlEIfI8IONS
SEPT. &, 2000
( ~lY~~2000)
I [
I [
) I
)1
UJ
ll.
~
z Ie i
liif ~ r
W~ ~ g
~l!!zF >!
ffi00~ ts
>.J UJ ~
8- 0 I
o ll. ill
~ 0 ~
Z II
c; ll.
II
>
FILE NUMBER
7693
:\'MPAO.1\7SI3\7Si03SrJEap'
'----
c
.-. .....
7
~
.-:JI
l
-,
............ ~
...... 'I:
............
............
~
"
~
~
~
~
"
'"
co
:!I
'" Iii
i i
III
21
.if'
.,<::J~O
0~GJ
." ~
0'
..: "t
f"""'i
PREUMINARY SKETCH
VIRGINIA OIL sITe AT PANTOPS
ON
PROPOSED TMP 78-76
ALBEMARLE COUN'TY. _......
cP
.::-y"
t)"
"'I)
\~&f:>
r:,') C'>'8~'" ~~f:>
C'>~.:f:C}~a,'o':.'" ,<>f:>::.~
",,<::- '.OJ 10'''' w
*",,,.'1j,fh, '~v,C"-"" 'Y
Y ')(,~ ,~~ ..." t
r:,y" ~~~r;, "..,r:,,~'v
'" '0) ~'v
.r:,
';:I
r;:.')
;i)'8
y"~r:,'\,,<>~-or:c""
,,~~... 'i
,ffc,:t"t,'o #' ~'y
~^O ,,'? Ii
')...~v,O~Y9>'v
.;:.... r\"-,,,~":
'i", 'h'i"''''
.r:, .
4'
s~...
:S."
"$ '.
"S~
'~<5''''t,
..
~~
<::::>, ~O'"
X-90G'<.<:;.s'?-2
~-9.s''''a
" $",'9"1-
"../
~.....
~1;.J';~~.~:b
..-.:: )(,J~~ 0
"b....9;:).... .c~r:J,,~0~~b
,,8'-{;,'c":...f' ,,'Sf;> ;:.<>#
0~# ->:-y~:oO;o"",.y",<:::J
~ <:::Jc;-.;:.""'';.,:O <;,^'i
~f. ""',,," oy" ~...o
..."'"" ,,0$ ~:!4'
"G5$il "'~ C)"'C)"'....
'" y .'" ^O.,<:::J .., "
->:-y~ C;o ~.g> c:- ,!(,>
C;; "\~rq :eo ^'''If
"o(if....eo "'~ V.G5
.~C)~ ... ^'it;>':.,eo
~ ~.......~<>
,ot
l
is
~ ",if
^-
"
, , '"
." ,
!~ ~
"c,i~
.~~,p
",t>.1$
"'-'.
~
~
!(
i ~
..."
e>1, ~<::-~
~ !':J^'..."l &
"",,"+"e>,:..>;:J
~"-,'O","1?,, ,,"-'
..,') #cf"
~"'\"'?I'
\V 1$>^
~tt q,o"u....
~ '!~,~+.
I ~ ,,'I>
b '
~t
.....- t.
II
~O
.a &! -Jj0
j/{'~"t, l'?> ~
~.., ~c.
// +9 ,,-?>~.
,;:,-of:> i,"t.V
\. -?
~"
~~
.0
!I
I
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND LAND PLANNERS
[dW A PROFESSION. AL CORP. ORA TION &I!
IIIEJ SERVING VIRGINIA SINCE' 856
914 MONTlCEUO ROAD - CHARL01TESVILlE, V1RGINIA'22902 s P
PHONE 804-977-Dl!ll5 " FAX 804-296-5220 - EMAlL INFO@ROUDABUSH.COM
"
,~
..,l A:~'
rt' ....~w
,; '>J
'/1~;~ ~
;0
,(j
~ 0
~~
$-0
'0
-o~1'
~" ,,'i
f/)""'~ ,t-
.. y ~o
<:,"'~~ ~\(j ff
!':J" C, '" (j'J
'8",," g ibC}\<:''''c;
",'<>~ c:,......~')
"-,,,,it ",Co.$
" ~"...~
Ii",,"
"
:w- Z :if
r;:.0
1f,-?3
-f!':J'\.,<>f:>~~
,,~~... "
/J>C;,c,~~'c,li-'" '>
,OJ(l)'c't
1~.lo ~-':'~\,
~ "S~"-.;:.'i)";
" \j'i...'"
.c:,"J
'rl
~
~
~
~
~
=
~
~
z
~
:=
~
~
r;
THIS SHEET TO
LANDSCAPING
BE USED FOR
PURPOSES ONL Yl
Landscaping Requirements:
Inter lor Landscap Ing ( Sect, 32.7 g, 7b)
Park I ng Lot
69 PROPOSED PARKING SPACES @ 1 LARGE SHAOE TREEI 10 SPACES = 7 LARGE SHADE TREES REO'O.
7 LARGE SHADE TREES PROVIDED (GREEN VASE ZELKOVA. SARGENT CHERRY) ,
49.951 SF (PAVED PARKING AND CIRCULATION AREA) @ 5% " 2,498 SF OF INTERIOR LANDSCAPING REQ'D
3.012 SF OF INTERIOR LANDSCAPING PROVIDED.
(-
~ "" "3;>0..<)
~ '1-~"~
~"9sl 0.0:;, 4+
0..<) <<'-9,l''4
"'<"" ~~&
:::::::..~~" '.I<<'~
~. -9-(,0 <"-9
. 0.
~
~
(
~
~
!
-$-(.,
~" '+.<)
0(., !9.1'"" /
'9"9:o.-?.9:"'~1'>
+".;.>..,,~ -(,o~';>4
vX-' -0 +"
~. '1?4.9oC'()
4('
4+"
Tree Canopy Requirements (Sect. 32.7.9.9)
TOT AL SITE AREA = 65. 340 SF @ 10% 6. 534 SF OF TREE CANOPY REQUIRED,
9, 2BB SF OF TREE CANOPY PROV IDEO.
B WILLOW OAKS @ 380 SF I EA.
8 NHITE ASH @ 413 SFI EA,
3 GREEN VASE ZELKOV A @ 490 SF I EA.
4 SARGENT CHERRY @ 240 SF I EA.
2 ALLEGHENY SERVICEBERRY @ 298 SF I EA.
TOTAL CANOPY PROVIDED (Post Development)
3. 040 SF
3. 304 SF
, - 1,470 SF
960 SF
596 SF
- 9. 370 SF
~$
"~
i? Notes
/'1-4 A:>,. ALL LANDSCAPING IS TO BE MAINTAINED BY OWNER AND REPLACED BY OWNER SHOULD ANY DIE.
-9.1'4 .l\.ft?~ STREET TREES ALONG THE ROUTE 250 RIGHT -DF-WA Y PLANTED AT 35 FEET ON CENTER,
~'" STREET H1EES ALONG THE ROLKIN ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANTED AT 40 FEET ON CENTER.
+.1'0. Q ALL OTHER TREES PLANTEO AS SHOWN.
~ ~THIS PLAN COMPLIES WITH THE CONDITIONS OUTLINED IN ZMA 98..20 (STREET TREES ON ROLKIN) .
"9, . "<)J b
0'.1;, "'rO-1fb
......-~a
",10-0. <"~~&
-$--9'9~ ""j<5'o.
. ""~ s6'-sl(''''''9
;;~" <".9<"", +
"9<<:: + ...,05'",....&
'9",,,....<< a o5'~'Y
"'0. ~~ '"
0."9'1<
&<
<"""<9,,,
"'.............--......................
0.(.,
(9)--~..oS' ("~.
,,<-. ~ ~ .",r::~
..., <9;'"9'1:::'9..5" ~ J?
C'<<::<o. 0. & ~'"
o +"+ ('0.('''9<<::
;.>",,~'t-C'~<"1-;
-Y}< <"",,~o.
'9"" <"
C'+
A TT A rnUFNT R
Ii
LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE
Symbol Quantity Common Name Botanical Name
Willow Oak Quercus phellos N/A 3.5"
~hite A.sh Fr8xinus americana N/A 3.5"
Green Vase le lkova Zelkova ser-rata 'Green Vase. N/A 2.5"
(
...-:
oG-:
o 89
o
c==J As shown
r....:..::~ As shown
o 14
Saf'gent Cherry
1-"" ""
6' 0.<9"96';;-(,0.<>
'105' 05' o.:g<9 ,/.;>'~.?", >6',
'4 "".;; 0.<'o-?.9;';><?~ :;/;':"
01-~"9~1o-G:~ -0-0 ~.y40
C'Jr v."'O~<"o.~-9
~J~"
;.>~
1o-C'<"
J'
~~
Prunus sargent i i
N/A 2.5'
"'s.
Allegheny Serviceberry
Ame)anchier .1aev is
4'..5' N/A
Crapemyrt le
Lagerstroemia indica
4'-5' N/A
Otto I.uken Laurel
PrunU5 laurocerasu5 "otto luyken"
18"-30. N/A
SChip Law'el
Prunus ] aurocerasus . 5ch ipkaensts'
18"-30. N/A
/
tj. /
/
/
/
/
/
I
I
PachY!landra
N/A N/A
'1-~O",
0'<"-905'<9 "
~~
'-1
Pachysandra terminal is
llrlope '81g Blue'
lIrlope MUSC3rl 'Big Blue'
N/A N/A
SCALE t. . 20'
Green Velvet Boxwood
BUXU5 'Green Velvet'
'"
..
12"-30' N/A
to
EX.
SCALE IHFEET
:"II
~ ~~
~l/)~8
It .
~IU :i:
tf:l <: ~fO '~!13
ts <: 001) l!i!2
9 ~j:~ .~a
Q. 1: i5 a:
Clll:IIJa:~
<: 00 ~~
tf:l ~ o..~ ~~
~ ~ ~g; ~I
..Y '( o~ 0 '
"'Q l/) oJ~ ii!1
It 1:' ~
~.~ ~~ ~
o It ~; ~~
:If~ ~~ ~~
:g ~ ~; ~*
~ W ~~ ~~
B~ 1: _lIJ
(!) "'w
<: z
OIUItJ~
er:: ~ IL
FEVI8IONS
SEPT. 5,2000
( JULV~; 2(XM) )
I (
I(
SCALE
1. - 20'
)1
)1
fJJ
Q.
~
~~ ~ i
Q.~ Q. .
~~Z~ !
~-OO IS
'fJJ~ ~ ~
.00 0 I
~~ ~ ~
z I[
C; Q.
a:
:>
FILE NUMBER
7693
:\TMPfnf\1S93\793SITE
::lIIIl
~
.-.J
9
Albemarle County Development Departments
SDP.2000-092
SPIN Submission and Comments
ATTACHMENT C
Pantops Convenience Center
Preliminary
Engineering
prelim plan
revision 2
reviewer
Glenn Brooks
received
9/7/00
reviewed
9/18/00
decision
approved
RE:Pantops Convenience Center, preliminary site plan
The preliminary site plan for the Pantops Convenience Center received on 7 September 2000 has been
reviewed. Preliminary plan comments from the Engineering Department have been adequately
addressed. Approval is recommended with the following condition:
1. The timing with the improvements for the Kroger site may be an issue. If the stormsewer system and
roadway are not installed, and this project must be completed, some interim measures may be necessary
for drainage and access. Ifthe regional basin designed with the South Pantops PDMC is to be used, it
must be built or bonded prior to final site plan approval. [32.5.6s].
The special use permit for the drive-through window must be approved [SP-2000.047] prior to site plan
approval. Based on the review of the preliminary site plan, the Engineering Department recommends
approval of the special use permit.
Also based on the review of the preliminary site plan, the waiver request for one-way circulation is
recommended for approval. The one-way circulation pattern is the only alternative to site circulation
given the number of uses proposed on the site. '
The following items must be submitted with the final site plan for review by the Engineering Department.
a. A completed application and fee for erosion control, and an erosion control plan, narrative and
computations. [18-32.7.4.3, 17.203, 17-303] .
. b. Acompleted stormwater management facilities maintenance agreement and fee. [17-323]
c. Drainage computations. [18-32.7.4. Policy]
VDOT approval will be required for any improvements to the Rt. 250 right.of-way. Please contact me if
you have questions,
Please contact me if you have questions.
9/19/00 08:35 AM
Page 1 of 1
10
~
ATTACHMENT D
PHONE (804) 293-4251
(804) 977.Q205
FAX (804) 296,5220
INFO@ROUDA8U5H,COM
LAND SURVEYORS
ENGINEERS
LAND PLANNERS
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOC", INC.
A PROFESSiONAL CORPORATION
914 MONTICELLO ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22902
~
J, THOMAS GALE, L.S
MARILYNN R. GALE, LS,
WILLIAM J, LED8E1TER. L.S.
EDWARD D, CAMPBELL III, 'LS.
DAVID L, COLLINS. L,S" P,E.
DOUGLAS R. 8RUCE. LS,
WILLIAM S. ROUDA8USH, L.S,
July 24, 2000
Attachment to Application for Special Use Permit
for TMP 78-76 (Drive-through window)
What is the Comprehensive Plan Designationfor this property?
The land use designation for this parcel is non-residential "Regional Service."
How will the proposed special use affect adjacent property?
The following is a list of the immediately adjacent properties.
- U.S. Rt. 250 (eastbound lane)
- TMP 78-74: Amoco gas station and convenience store.
- TMP 78-73A: Site of future shopping center (see currently-unapproved site, plan for
"The Kroger Store at Pantops")
~.
Adjoining properties will not be adversely impacted by any additional traffic that may be
generated by the drive-through window. The site is positioned at the entrance of the proposed
shopping center, meaning that vehicles are not required to cross the shopping center to access the
drive-through window. Similarly, the multiple turn lanes and restricted ingress/egress on Rolkin
Road serve to insulate the Amoco site from any additional drive-through traffic.
The drive-through window has been designed so that the vehicles being served will be oriented
away from Rt. 250, so that headlight glare will not be a problem. The car wash and landscaping
have been arranged to minimize the visual impact of the drive-through from Rt. 250.
How will the proposed special use affect the character of the district surrounding the property?
Drive-through windows are already featured on several nearby properties. Some examples
include the DMV site Gust east on Rt. 250), the Guaranty Bank (at the intersection ofRt 250 and
State Farm Blvd), and the One Valley Bank (also on State Farm Blvd). The presence of existing
drive-through windows indicates that this application is completely in harmony with the
character of the surrounding district.
~.
11
ATTACHMENT D
How is the use in harmony with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance?
PD-MC districts are intended to encourage access to internal road systems rather than multiple
entrances to existing public roads. The proposed drive-through window does not affect the site
in this regard; access is still to be made via entrances and exits to internal roads (Rolkin Rd and
Abbey Rd).
How is the use in harmony with the uses permitted by right in the district?
Fast-food restaurants are by-right uses in the PD-MC district (18-25A.2.1.1, 18-24.2.1.30).
Drive-through windows are natural accessories to fast-food restaurants.
What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of the Zoning Ordinance apply to this use?
None.
How will this use promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community?
The combination of services available on this site will promote the general welfare by reducing
the length of vehicle trips in this portion of the county. Consumers will be able to purchase
gasoline, snacks and fast food at one place instead of having to drive to multiple destinations.
An integral part of this combination of services is the Dairy Queen Brazier, and the drive-through
window is a virtual necessity for its success.
Describe your request in detail and include all pertinent information such as the numbers of
persons involved in the use, operating hours, andany unique features of the use,
The proposed drive-through window is to be an accessory to the Dairy Queen Brazier, which is to
be located in the northern and western portion of the proposed building. Although we cannot
precisely predict the number of persons who will use the drive through, a recent study from IDQ
Companies, Inc. indicates that 50-55% of sales' (in dollars) occur the drive-through for full-menu
Braziers.
The drive-through window will be operated 24 hrs a day.
12
~
LAND SURVEYORS
ENGINEERS
LAND PLANNERS
ATTACHMENT E
ROUDABUSH, GALE & ASSOC., INC"
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
914 MONTICELLO ROAD
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22902
PHONE (604) 293-4251
(804) 977-0205
FAX (604) 296,5220
INFO@ROUDABUSH,COM
----,
J. THOMAS GALE, LS.
MARILYNN R GALE. LS,
WILLIAM J. LEDBETTER. LS.
EDWARD D, CAMPBELL III, LS,
DOUGLAS R BRUCE, LS,
WILLIAM 5, ROUDABUSH, L,S,
September 5,2000
Mr Wayne Cilimberg
Director of Planning & Community Development
County of Albemarle
401 Mcintire Road
Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia
22902-4596
Re:
Pantops Convenience Center, Site Plan
Request for a Waiver of Sections 4.12.6.1 & 4.12.6.2.
Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance
One-Way Circulation & One-Way Ingress / Egress
.~,
Dear Mr. Cilimberg,
I am writing you, as agent for the Albemarle County Planning Commission, to
request a waiver of Sections 4.12.6.1 & 4.12.6.2 ofthe Albemarle County Zoning
Ordinance. This request, if granted, would allow us to provide one-way vehicular
circulation for the portion of this site that serves both the fast food drive-thru window and
the self-serve car wash. Additionally, we are requesting approval for one-way
ingress/egress on the site. These requests are being made in conjunction with a Site Plan
and Special Use Permit application that is proposed for this location and currently under
review.
One-way circulation is an inherent design element any time you have either a
drive-thru window or a car wash, and it is for this reason that the two uses are located
together on the northwest side of the proposed building. This allows us to restrict the area
of one-way-only travel to just that portion of the site. We have three lanes of one-way
travel proposed with the middle lane acting as a by-pass lane for traffic that is not using
either the drive-thru window or the car wash. All one-way lanes shall have the mandatory
12 foot minimum width with the appropriate pavement markings and directional signage
to assure safety and ease of use. We have proposed a one-way egress in conjunction with
these one-way lanes at the southwest comer of the site. Having an exit here is essential
for minimizing circulation on the site; however, adding an entrance at the same location
would just increase the pptential for vehicle conflicts in the area.
.'~
13
ATTACHMENT E
A quick review of the site plan demonstrates that the location of the proposed one-way
travel would in no way restrict the circulation patterns of other vehicles that may be
either parked or using other services on this site" In other words any vehicle that is not
using the drive-thru or car wash can still access all points of this site without being forced
to use surrounding roadways or adjoining parcels.
We are also requesting approval ofa one-way entrance to the site from Rolkin Road.
Both VDOT and the County Engineering Department have expressed a strong
recommendation that this entrance not be two-way (see attached letter from Jim
Kesterson of VDOT).
In summing up, we think that it is fair to say that we do not believe that the strict
application of the requirements of Sections 4"12.6.1 & 4.12.6.2 would forward the
purposes of this ordinance or best serve the public's interest. We thank you for your
consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
J)~2j?~-
Douglas R. Bruce, L.S.
cc: File
Frayser White, Virginia Oil Co.
Bill Owens, Atwood Architects
14
~
October 23, 2000
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 - '5823
Fax (804) 972 - 4012
Valerie W: Long
McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, LLP
POBox 1288
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Ms. Long:
RE: SP-00-051 David T. Pastors - Tax Map 55, Parcel 93
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on October 17, 2000 unanimously .
recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that this
approval is subject to the following conditions:
1, The top of the pole, as measured Above Sea Level (ASL), shall never exceed seven (7) feet above the
top of the tallest tree within twenty five (25) feet of the facility at or below the same base elevation as the
pole, measured Above Sea Level (ASL). No antennas or equipment, with the exception of the grounding
rod, shall be located above the top of the pole.
2. The facility shall be designed, constructed and maintained as follows:
,."...,.
a,
b,
c,
The wooden pole shall be natural dark brown color;
Guy wires shall not be permitted;
No lighting shall be permitted on the site or on the pole, except as provided by condition number
nine (9) herein;
The ground equipment cabinets, antennas, concrete pad and all equipment attached to the pole
shall be dark brown in color and .shall be no larger than the specifications set forth in the attached
plan entitled "Yancey Mills";
The antennas shall be painted dark brown in color, to match the color of the pole;
Only flush mounted antennas shall be permitted, No antennas that project outfrom the pole shall
be permitted;
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a statement to the Planning
Department by a registered surveyor certifying the height of the tallest tree, as measured both in
feet above ground and also elevation Above Sea Level from the same base elevation within
twenty-five (25) feet of the pole;
Within one month after the completion of the pole installation, the applicant shall provide a
statement to the Planning Department certifying the height of the pole, measured both in feet
above ground and in elevation above sea-level (ASL);
The pole shall not extend above the top of the tallest tree, except as described in condition
number 1 of this special use permit without prior approval of an amendment to this special use
permit.
d.
e,
f.
g.
h.
i.
3. The facility shall be located as shown on the attached plan entitled "Yancey Mills"
Page 2
October 23, 2000
.~,
4. Equipment shall be attached to the pole only as follows:
a. Antennas shall be limited to the sizes shown on the attached plan entitled "Yancey Mills";
b. , Satellite and microwave dishes are prohibited;
c, A grounding rod, whose height shall not exceed two feet and whose width shall not exceed one-
inch diameter at the base and tapering to a point, may be installed at the top of the pole,
5, Prior to beginning construction or installation of the pole or the equipment cabinets, or installation of
access for vehicles or utilities, a tree conservation plan, developed by a certified arborist, specifying tree
protection methods and procedures and identifying any existing trees to be removed on the site both
inside and outside the access easement and lease area shall be submitted to the Director of Planning
and Community Development for approval. All construction or installation associated with the pole and
equipment building, including necessary access for construction or installation, shall be in accordance
with this tree conservation plan. Except for the tree removal expressly authorized by the Director of
Planning and Community Development, the permittee shall not remove existing trees within two hundred
(200) feet of the pole and equipment building. A special use permit amendment shall be required for any
future tree removal within the two hundred-foot buffer, after the installation of the subject facility.
6, The pole shall be disassembled and removed from the site within ninety (90) days of the date its use for
wireless telecommunications purposes is discontinued,
7, The permittee shall submit a report to the Zoning Administrator one time per year, no later than July 1 of
that year. The report shall identify each user of the pole and shall identify each user of the pole and
identify each user that is a wireless telecommunication service provider, ..-.,
8, No slopes associated with construction of the pole and accessory uses shall be created that are steeper
than 2: 1 unless retaining walls, revetments, or other stabilization measures acceptable to the County
Engineer are employed,
9, Outdoor lighting shall be limited to periods of maintenance only, Each outdoor luminaire shall be fully
shielded such that all light emitted is projected below a horizontal plane running through the lowest part of
the shield or shielding part of the luminaire. For purposes of this condition, a luminary is a complete
lighting unit consisting of a lamp or lamps together with the parts designed to distribute the light, to
position and protect the lamps, and to connect the lamps to the power supply,
10. The permittee shall comply with section 5,1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance, Fencing of the lease area shall
not be permitted.
11, The applicant shall obtain and record a tree preservation easement on Tax Map 55/Parcel 19D, to protect
the trees providing screening between the proposed facility and the right-of-way.
12. The applicant shall submit a revised set of site drawings to the Department of Planning and Community
Development, in order to ensure that all conditions of this special use permit and the ARB Certificate of
Appropriateness are reflected in the dravvings. The revised drawings must be approved and signed by
Planning staff and the Design Planner prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of the
facility,
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive
public comment at their meeting on November 8, 2000. Any new or additional information regarding your
application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your
scheduled hearing date,
~
Page 3
October 23, 2000
The Commission also approved the following:
. Reduction in setback in accord with the provisions of Section 4.10.3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance,
. Site plan waiver, in accord with the provisions of Section 32.2.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, subject to
the following conditions:
1. Approval of an erosion and sediment control plan prior to the issuance of a building permit;
2. Provision of one parking space;
3, A site plan application shall be required if activity on slopes of 25% or greater is proposed;
4, Staff review and approval to ensure that all conditions of the special use permit are reflected
in the final revisions of the construction drawings, prior to issuance of a building permit;
5, The revised plan shall be re-titled with the property owner's name, "Pastors (Triton PCS)",
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely,
,-
/~~
Stephen Waller
Planner
SW/jcf
Cc: Ella Carey
Amelia McCulley
Jack Kelsey
Steve Allshouse
Bob Ball
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
STEPHEN WALLER
OCTOBER 17, 2000
NOVEMBER 8, 2000
/....-~
SP 00-051 Pastors (Triton peS)
Applicant's Proposal:
The applicant is proposing to install a personal wireless telecommunications facility consisting of
a self supporting wooden monopole at a height of seven (7) feet above the tallest tree within 25
feet. Three flush-mount panel antennas (approximately 4 feet in height), and lightning rod would
be attached to the pole. Ground equipment will be housed in a six feet, nine inches tall metal
cabinet on a 10-foot by 12-foot concrete pad. According to the applicant's request, approval of
this facility would allow Triton and AT&T to increase wireless coverage along Interstate Route
64 West (Attachment A). The property, described as Tax Map 55/ParceI93, contains
approximately 21 acres zoned RA, Rural Areas in the White Hall District (Attachment B), This
site lies within the area designated as Rural Area 3 by the Comprehensive Plan.
Crown Communications, a company which constructs facilities for various wireless service
providers, has leased an approximately 15,625 square feet area on the subject parcel. In turn, a
200 square foot portion of the larger lease area has been subleased to the applicant, Triton PCS,
Inc. ~,
Some ofthe trees that have been used as justification for the Triton pole height are located within
the Crown lease area. The general conditions of approval with requests for wireless facilities
would limit cutting of trees within 200 feet of the proposed facility. Therefore, any of the trees
within the larger lease site that are not related to this specific request, or for establishing access to
the facility, would be protected. For the purpose of this review, only the information relating to
this specific request has been considered. Any additional facilities would require new special use
permits. Additionally, any proposed changes in this application would require an amendment to
the special use permit conditions, or the requested site plan waiver. A set of plans showing the
specific location and design of the proposed facility is provided in Attachment C.
Petition:
Triton PCS, Inc. maintains several facilities within the County of Albemarle as part of a system
intended to provide wireless service coverage throughout the area. This request is for a special
use permit to allow the construction of a personal wireless service facility in accordance with
Section 10.2.2.6 of the Zoning Ordinance which allows for radio wave transmission and relay
towers. The proposed site for the facility is a 200 square feet lease area located within a larger
lease area which has been obtained by Crown Communications. The 92-foot tall Poplar tree
which is being used as the basis for the requested height is located approximately 25 feet south of
the proposed pole and situated at nearly the same base elevation designated for the pole itself--
1
~,
approximately 705 feet above sea-level. The proposed location of the facility site is indicated on
a topographic map which is included as Attachment D.
Character of the Area:
The property is located in Yancey Mills, on thewest side of Route 684, approximately 1/8 mile
north of the intersection with Route 738. With the exception of the property identified as Tax
Map 55A/Parce145, which is zoned Village Residential, all adjacent parcels are zoned Rural
Areas. The outside edge of the larger 15,625 square foot lease area for the proposed facility is
located approximately 32 feet from the boundary line of a parcel does not have the same owner
as the subject parcel (Tax Map 55A/ParceI45). However, the monopole, itself, would be located
at the center of that lease area approximatelyl03 feet from that property line.
The site lies more than 300 feet north ofInterstate Route 64 within a heavily wooded area
containing large and mature trees are located between the site and Route 53, this includes a long
line of tall evergreens situated on the embankment along the side ofthe road. There are no
dwelling units located within 200 feet ofthe facility site and the nearest existing structure is an
abandoned house which is located approximately 470 feet a way from the proposed pole location
and on the same parcel.
Access to the site will be provided off of Route 684 from an existing gravel road which would be
extended to the west and then south to the facility site. Because the portion of the access road to
be extended from the existing gravel road is a rough path which is already clear, there would be
no need for removal of any significant vegetation. The proposed 12-foot wide gravel service
drive will be located within a 20-foot wide access easement.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the
Zoning Ordinance and recommends approval with conditions.
Plannin2 and Zonin~ History:
No planning or zoning history is available for this parcel. A single-family dwelling unit
currently exists on the property.
Comprehensive Plan:
~.
The impacts of the facility have been reviewed for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and
the Zoning Ordinance. The Comprehensive Plan currently contains limited review criteria for
the siting oftelecommunications facilities. However, the applicant has voluntarily attempted to
demonstrate that the proposed facility can be constructed in accordance with the guidelines set
forth in the draft Wireless Policy Manual which is currently under consideration for adoption as a
2
future component of the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, staff analysis includes an assessment
ofthis proposal's compliance with the Wireless Policy.
.~,
Staffs analysis focuses mainly on the visibility of the site from surrounding properties and
roadways. The site of the proposed facility is relatively flat, and is surrounded by tall, mature
trees that are located at approximately the same elevation. A balloon was floated at the proposed
pole height of99 feet during a recent field visit to the site and staff observed that the balloon was
only visible for a short distance wJ;rile travelling at a low speed in the eastbound lane of 1-64.
Staff also attempted to locate the balloon from the right of the adjacent properties located, and
observed that the balloon was most visible from points along the front of the subject parcel when
looking west from Route 684. Additional trees lined along the roadside acted to obscure the view
of the balloon while travelling farther north on Route 684, and away from the driveway to the
subject property. It is staffs opinion that the brown monopole and ground equipment would not
be highly visible from Route 64, or from the surrounding properties.
Staff notes that due to the dense canopy that exists directly above the facility site, the balloon
was actually floated approximately 50 feet southwest of the surveyed pole location, and closer to
the existing clearing where the access road will enter the site. Because of this, the balloon was
tested in an area with shorter trees, at a distance which was farther away from the 92- foot tall tree
that the request is based on, and another 92-foot tall tree which is located approximately 30 feet
away from the proposed pole location.
This site lies within Rural Area 3 by the Comprehensive Plan, in an area designated as forests
and farmlands on the Open Space Plan Concept Map. The Open Space Plan identifies forests as
large contiguous areas, which are currently forested, have the best soils for hard woods, and are
not in subdivisions. Fannlands are identified as large areas where the soils are of prime quality,
or best suited for a specific agricultural use. Both, forests and fannlands are defined as major
open space systems recommended for protection in the Rural Areas. Because of the minimal
amount of disturbance that will be required within the lease area and within access easement for
the service road, staff is of the opinion that this particular facility would not impose any
significant impacts on the natural state of the forests, or have any adverse effects on the
fannlands of the subject parcel and the adjacent properties.
~.
The facility site is located within 500 feet of the Interstate Route 64 right-of-way, an Entrance
Corridor, and the Architectural Review Board addresses the aesthetic impact of all development
within the Entrance Corridor Overlay District. The intent of the Entrance Corridor Overlay
District, as stated in the Zoning Ordinance, is in part, "to implement the Comprehensive Plan
goal of protecting the county's natural, scenic and historic, architectural and cultural resources,
including preservation of natural and scenic resources as the same may serve this purpose," and,
"to protect the County's attractiveness to tourists and other visitors; to sustain and enhance the
economic benefits accruing to the County from tourism." Although the top of pole will be
visible from Route 64 for a short distance, it is anticipated that visibility of the facility would be
minimal as a result of, both, its design and location within a heavily wooded area with trees that
are comparable in height.
/-,
The Architectural Review Board addresses the aesthetic impact of all development within the
Entrance Corridor Overlay District. The ARB has supported and approved this proposal with
3
conditions to be reviewed and approved administratively by the Design Planner (Attachment E).
One of the remaining issues that must be resolved relates to the importance of screening provided
by vegetation on an adjacent parcel, situated between the facility and 1-64 (Tax Map 55/Parcel
19D). Because that parcel is owned by the same party as the subject parcel, the ARB has offered
two options as a condition for issuing the Certificate of Appropriateness; the applicant must
either relocate the access road, or provide assurance that trees located on parcel19D will be
protected. Because the pathofthe proposed road already exists and will require very limited
clearing, staffs recommendations for the special use permit includes a condition that will require
the applicant obtain and record a tree preservation easement on Tax Map 55/ParceI19D, between
the facility and the right-of-way.
STAFF COMMENT:
Staffwill address he issues of this request in four sections:
1. Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance;
2. Section 704 (a)(7)(b)(I)(II) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996;
3. The draft Wireless Policy Manual
4. Reduction of setback from Tax Map 55/Parce119D in accord with the provisions
of Section 4.10.3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance
5. Waiver of a site plan in accordance with the provisions of Section 32.2.2 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
1. Staffwill address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use permits
permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued
upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of substantial detriment to
adiacent property"
Although the outer edges 15,625 square foot larger lease area for the proposed facility is
approximately 12 feet from the nearest property line, which is under the same ownership, and 32
feet from the next closest property line, there are no property lines within the 99 foot "fall radius"
of the proposed monopole. Furthermore, the site is also located in a wooded area, more than 300
feet away from the nearest public road and surrounded by trees. These trees would provide
natural screening for the proposed ground equipment and the monopole which would be built at a
height that is comparable to the heights of some of the taller trees in the area. Based on a field
visit, staffhas determined that the top portion of the pole, should be minimally visible from
Interstate 64 and at a distance from State Route 684. Therefore, it is staffs opinion that this
monopole will be a minor feature that is not highly distinguishable from adjacent properties in
the area and blends well into the existing natural landscape.
The largest portion of the access drive to the lease site will be created by upgrading a wooded
path that extends from the existing driveway serving the property. The applicant's request
indicates that once the facility and its access drive has been constructed and is fully operational,
Triton service personnel would normally travel to the unoccupied site once a month for routine
maintenance and service visits. Staff also anticipates that some unscheduled visits would be
4
necessary on occasions when electrical power to the site is interrupted by weather or other
unexpected factors. However, because the access road is completely internal to the subject
parcel, service vehicles accessing the isolated lease site would not have to pass through any of
the adjacent parcels. Therefore, staff does not expect this schedule of site visits to create a
significant increase in activity or traffic within the area.
~
Based on the above-cited factors, staff finds that the proposed facility would not impose any
substantial detriment to adjacent properties.
that the character of the district will not be changed thereby.
The presence of various types of utilities in the Rural Areas is not uncommon, and there are
several wooden utility poles located within the area surrounding this site. This includes poles
that are appurtenant to an overhead power line which crosses the subject parcel nearthe State
Route 684 right-of-way. Although those power poles are all similar in color to that of the
proposed pole, the monopole would be in taller in height and larger in diameter than that of the
more common utility poles. However, staff also recognizes that the amount of disturbance
required for in preparation for the placement of a wireless facility is often very minimal when
compared to that required for power lines.
The main objective of the County's draft Wireless Design Policy is to site personal wireless
facilities in locations where they have a lower sense of intrusion upon on the surrounding area.
This facility would be located within a densely wooded area and accessed by extending an
existing gravel driveway over a rough path which is largely cleared. With the exception of the
portion of the monopole which would extend above the canopy, the presence of the existing trees
should be effective in obscuring the view of most of the facility's components. This has been a
favored approach in the County's attempt to site wireless facilities in areas where they will have
limited visual impact. Therefore, staff finds that the low visibility of the proposed facility would
not result in a change in the character of the district.
~,
and that such use will be in harmony with the pUIl'ose and intent of this
ordinance"
Staffhas reviewed the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as stated Sections 1.4, 1.5,
and 1.6 with particular reference to Sections 10, 1.4, 1.4.4, and 1.5. All of these provisions
address, in one form or another, the provision of public services. Mobile telephones clearly
provide a public service as evidenced by the expanded and rapid increase in use. Based on the
provision of a public service, staffs opinion is that this request is in hannony with the purpose
and intent of these sections of the Ordinance, Section 1.4.3 states as an intent of the Ordinance,
"To facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community". The
provision of this facility does increase the availability and convenience for users of wireless
phone technology.
In Section 10.1 ofthe Zoning Ordinance the limited delivery of services is listed as one ofthe
intents for the Rural Areas District. By providing .a larger range for telecommunications, this
request and similar requests for wireless communication facilities would act to increase the level
of services that are provided in the Rural Areas' zoning district. However, such an increase
5
~, would not be in conflict with the agricultural and forestal obj ectives, nor any of the other rural .
objectives set forth for the district. Therefore, staff opinion is that this request complies with this
provision of Section 31.2.4.1,
with the uses permitted by right in the district.
The proposed facility will not restrict the current uses on the subject parcel, or by-right uses on
any other property within the distJjct. However, in order to maintain proper screening of
personal wireless facilities, the general conditions of approval place specific restrictions on the
activity of cutting trees within a certain distance of the facility sites. This will actually limit
forestry, a by right use in the Rural Areas, on the subject property and one adjacent property with
the same owner.
with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance.
Section 5.1.12 of the Ordinance contains regulations governing personal wireless facilities and
appropriate conditions are proposed to ensure compliance with this provision of the Ordinance.
and with the public health. safety and general welfare.
The provision of increased communication facilities may be considered consistent with the
public health and safety and general welfare by providing increased communication services in
"........, the event of emergencies and increasing overall general communication services. The
Telecommunications Act addresses issues of environmental effects with the following language,
"No state or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement
construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the
environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with
the Commissions' regulations concerning such emissions". In order to operate this facility, the
applicant is required to meet the FCC guidelines for radio frequency emissions. This
requirement will adequately protect the public health and safety.
2. Section 704(a)(7)(b)(I)(II) of The Telecommunications Act of 1996:
The regulation of the placement. construction and modification of personal
wireless facilities by any state or local government or instrumentality thereof shall
not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless
servIces.
Neither the Comprehensive Plan nor the Zoning Ordinance prohibits the provision of personal
wireless service. Staff does not believe that the special use permit process or the denial of this
application has the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless service. The applicant
has not demonstrated that there are no other locations within the proposed area of service
currently available for construction of a new facility. For this reason, staff does not believe that
denial of this application would have the effect of prohibiting the provision of services.
,.....,.
Prior to development of the draft County's Wireless Policy, which is currently under
consideration for adoption, opportunities for collocation on existing structures were
6
recommended as an alternative to the construction of new facilities. However, it is staffs
opinion that opportunities for collocation on existing facilities may, in some cases, have the
undesirable effect of increasing visibility of existing facilities by requiring greater structure
heights. Alternate sites for the construction of a new facility for this service area have not been
discussed, and staffs review of the request is specific to this site alone. Therefore staff review
ofthis proposal has been based largely on the applicant's ability to demonstrate that compliance
with the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan, at the proposed monopole height of 93 feet,
is possible. Staffnotes that the applicant has also voluntarily attempted to comply with the Tier
II criteria set forth in the draft Personal Wireless service Facilities Policy.
~,
3. County of Albemarle Draft Personal Wireless Service Facilities Policy
Although the Board of Supervisors has not yet adopted the Wireless Facilities Policy, the
applicant has voluntarily used the Policy as a guiding instrument in planning the facility
proposed in this request. In accordance with the Policy, the proposed communication facility
would implement the following summarized guidelines:
Limited visibility: If constructed at the recommended height of seven feet above the
highest tree within 25 feet, the proposed pole would be located at a height that would help
limit visibility from adjoining properties, as well as from nearby public roads.
The proposed monopole is a natural wooden structure, and all ground equipment
including the concrete utility pad would be painted dark brown to blend with its
surrounding environment. In order to be as inconspicuous as possible, the panel antennas
would flush mounted, so as not to extend out more the 12 inches from the face of the
pole, and painted a dark brown color to match the wooden pole. No permanent lighting
would be used at the site or on the pole.
,~
Protection of ridge tops and ridgelines: No ridgetops or ridgelines would be adversely
impacted by the monopole at its restricted height of 7 feet above the top of the highest
tree within 25 feet of the structure,
Utilize existing structure: Due to the proposed height of the structure the applicant has
advised staff that there are no existing facilities or structures within this area that would
accommodate the additional equipment. Therefore, collocation on another facility is not
feasible, according to the applicant.
Appropriateness in any zoning district: The height of the pole would be limited by the
heights of trees within 25 feet. The unlighted site and the natural, earthen colors used on
the equipment, the antennas, and the limited height would be as unobtrusive as possible.
Aside from limiting the locations where trees can be cut on the subject parcel, the
proposed unmanned facility would not act to restrict any of the existing by right uses
within the Rural Areas, nor would it establish a use that is any more intensive than those
uses allowed by right within district.
Ground based equipment in keeping with the area character: The proposed ground
7
equipment would be six feet and nine inches in height, and the dark brown color ofthe
cabinets and the concrete pad would aid in blending the ground equipment in with the
surrounding environment.
Limited visibility of the antennas: The brown painted antennas would be approximately
44.7 inches long, 6.3 inches wide, and 2.7 inches thick. By virtue of the generally
recommended conditions, the distance between the outside face of the pole to the face of
the antennas.can not exceed 12 inches.
4. Reduction of setback in accord with the provisions of Section 4.10.3.1 of the Zoning
Ordinance:.
Section 4.10.3. 1 states:
"The height limitations of this chapter shall not apply to bams, silos, farm buildings,
agricultural museums designed to appear as traditional farm buildings, residential
chimneys, spires, flag poles, monuments or transmission towers and cables; smokestack,
water tank, radio or television antenna or tower, provided that except as otherwise
permitted by the commission in a specific case, no structure shall be located closer in
distance to any lot line than the height of the structure; and, provided further that such
structure shall not exceed one hundred (100) feet in height in a residential district. This
height limitation shall not apply to any of the above designated structures now or
hereafter located on existing public utility easements" .
The proposed monopole would be located approximately 97 feet from the nearest property line
(the boundary shared with Tax Map 55/ParceI19D). The site is located such that the facility
would meet the standard required setbacks from all adjacent property lines, and the property with
which that boundary line is shared, is held under the ownership of the same party as the subject
parcel. However, due to the height limitations and setback requirements for residential districts,
set forth in Section 4.10.3.1, the applicant is requesting approval of a waiver which would allow
the monopole to be built closer to the nearest property line, in feet, than its vertical height.
By the requirements of this provision the proposed monopole would need to be located at least
approximately 99 feet from all property lines. This assumes a 92 foot height for the tallest tree
within 25 feet, whereas the tallest portion of any part of the monopole could extend no more than
7 feet above that tree. Although the monopole would be located approximately 97 feet from the
property line, there are no structures within its 97-foot "fall radius".
Staff opinion is that this setback provision is designed to prevent undue crowding of the land and
to prevent safety hazards if equipment and ice attached to the monopole, or the pole itself were to
fall.
Staff notes that the County has approved reductions in setback for similar proposals, and if the
Commission is able to support this request on the basis of its evaluation for compliance with the
~ provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 approval of this modification is appropriate. Because ofthe
isolated location of the proposed facility, staff opinion is that approval of the modification does
8
not result in undue crowding of the land and does not represent a safety hazard. Therefore, staff
is able to support this request for modification of setback.
.~,
5. Request for a site plan waiver, in accord with the provisions of Section 32.2.2 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
The Commission may waive the drawing of a site plan if requiring a site plan would not forward
the purpose of the ordinance or otl}erwise serve the public interest. Generally the site review
committee has endorsed the use of site plan waivers for the establishment of telecommunications
facilities. This general endorsement is based on the relatively small area impacted by the
proposed use and the ability to obtain the required information through an erosion and sediment
control plan and the building permits. In this case the construction of the facility will require
activity related to construction of a service road, connection of utilities which are currently on
site, and the placement of the monopole and ground equipment. Based on the minimal activity
necessary for installation, staff is unable to identify any purpose which would be served by
requiring the submission of a site plan. . Staff recommends approval of a full site plan waiver for
the wireless facility proposed in SP 00-51, subject to the following conditions:
1.
Approval of an erosion and sediment control plan prior to the issuance of a building
permit;
Provision of one parking space;
A site plan application shall be required if activity on slopes of25% or greater is
proposed;
Staff review and approval to ensure that all conditions of SP 00-51 are reflected in the
final revisions of the construction drawings, prior to issuance of a building permit; and,
The revised plan shall be re-titled with the property owner's name, "Pastors (Triton
PCS)".
2.
3.
4.
5.
SUMMARY:
Staffhas identified the following factors, which are favorable to this request:
1 . The facility will provide increased wireless capacity, which may be considered consistent
with the provisions of Sections 1.4, 1.4.4 and 1.5;
2. The facility will not restrict any permitted uses on adjacent properties;
3. The design and siting ofthe facility is such that it will have limited visual impact on
adjacent property and public roads; and,
4. Access to the facility will be provided by extending an existing driveway and placing
gravel over an existing path.
Staffhas identified no factors that are unfavorable to this request.
9
..----.,
The following factors are relevant to this consideration:
1. There is an existing reasonable use of the property; and,
2. The facility site is located within the Entrance Corridor Overlay District.
Staff opinion is that this request generally complies with the provisions of the Ordinance and is
not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff opinion is that while this site is located within the Rural Areas, and visible from off of the
property, the existing trees reduce the impacts such that approval would not be inconsistent with
the goals set forth in the draft Wireless Policy. Therefore, staff recommends approval subject to
the following conditions:
(In the event that the Board chooses to deny this application staff offers the following comment:
In order to comply with the provisions of the Telecommunication Act, staff requests consensus
direction from the Board regarding the basis for denial of the application and instruction to staff
to return to the Board with a written decision for the Board's consideration and action.)
Recommended conditions of approval:
1. The height of the pole, as measured Above Sea Level (ASL), shall not ever exceed seven
(7) feet above the height of the tallest tree, measured Above Sea Level (ASL) from the
same base elevation as the pole, within twenty five (25) feet of the facility.
2. The facility shall be designed, constructed and maintained as follows:
a. The wooden pole shall be natural dark brown color;
b. Guy wires shall not be permitted;
c. No lighting shall be permitted on the site or on the pole, except as provided by
condition number eleven (9) herein;
d. The ground equipment cabinets and concrete pad shall be dark brown in color and
shall be no larger than the specifications set forth in the attached plan entitled
"Yancey Mills";
e. The antennas shall be painted dark brown in color, to match the color ofthe pole;
f. Only flush mounted antennas shall be permitted. No antennas that project out
from the pole shall be permitted;
g. Within one month after the completion of the pole, the applicant shall provide a
statement to the Planning Department certifying the height of the pole, measured
both in feet above ground and in elevation above sea-level (ASL);
h. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a statement to
the Planning Department by a registered surveyor certifying the height of the
tallest tree, as measured both in feet above ground and also elevation Above Sea
Level from the same base elevation within twenty-five (25) feet of the pole;
10
1.
The pole cannot ever extend above tree heights, except as described in condition
number one of these conditions of approval, without prior approval ofan
amendment of this special use permit.
~"
3. The pole shall be located as follows:
a. The pole shall be located as shown on the attached plan entitled "Yancey Mills";
b. The proposed facility shall be located not more than 25 feet from the access road.
4. Equipment shall be attached to the pole only as follows:
a. Antennas shall be limited to the sizes shown on the attached plan entitled "Yancey
Mills";
b. Satellite and microwave dishes are prohibited;
c. No portion of the pole, including the antennas, shall extend more than seven (7)
feet above the highest part of the tallest tree within 25 feet of the pole, as
measured Above Sea Level.
d. A grounding rod, whose height shall not exceed two feet and whose width shall
not exceed one-inch diameter at the base and tapering to a point, may be installed
at the top of the pole;
5.
Prior to beginning construction or installation of the pole or the equipment cabinets, or
installation of access for vehicles or utilities, a tree conservation plan, developed by a
certified arborist, specifying tree protection methods and procedures and identifying any
existing trees to be removed on the site both inside and outside the access easement and
lease area shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Community Development
for approval. All construction or installation associated with the pole and equipment
building, including necessary access for construction or installation, shall be in
accordance with this tree conservation plan. Except for the tree removal expressly
authorized by the Director of Planning and Community Development, the permittee shall
not remove existing trees within two hundred (200) feet of the pole and equipment
building.
~.
6. The pole shall be disassembled and removed from the site within ninety (90) days of the
date its use for wireless telecommunications purposes is discontinued.
7. The permittee shall submit a report to the Zoning Administrator one time per year, no
later than July I of that year. The report shall identify each user of the pole and shall
identify each user of the pole and identify each user that is a wireless telecommunication
service provider.
8, No slopes associated with construction ofthepole and accessory uses shall be created that
are steeper than 2: I unless retaining walls, revetments, or other stabilization measures
acceptable to the County Engineer are employed.
9.
Outdoor lighting shall be limited to periods of maintenance only. Each outdoor luminary
shall be fully shielded such that all light emitted is projected below a horizontal plane
/--.,.
11
running though the lowest part of the shield or shielding part of the luminaries. For
purposes of this condition, a luminaries is a complete lighting unit consisting of a lamp or
lamps together with the parts designed to distribute the light, to position and protect the
lamps, and to connect the lamps to the power supply.
10. The permittee shall comply with section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance. Fencing of the
lease area shall not be permitted.
11. The applicant shall obtain and record a tree preservation easement on Tax Map 55/Parcel
19D, to protect the trees providing screening between the proposed facility and the right-
of-way.
12. The applicant shall submit a revised set of site drawings to the Department of Planning
and Community Development, in order to ensure that all conditions of this special use
permit and the ARB Certificate of Appropriateness are reflected in the drawings. The
revised drawings must be approved and signed by Planning staff and the Design Planner
prior to the issuance ofa building permit for construction of the facility.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Application and Request for Special Use Permit
B - Tax Map
C - Site Information and Construction Drawings, entitled "Yancey Mills"
D - Topographic Map Section
E- ARB Approval Letter (dated September 25,2000)
~
12
.l
ATTACHMENT J
Section 31.2.4.1 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance states that, "The boa;
hereby reserves unto itself-the right to issue all special use permits permitted hereu PAGE 2
permits for uses. as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the board of supervisors
~'.
that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property. that the character of the district
will not be <thanged thereby and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of this
ordinance, with the uses permitted by right in the district, with additional regulations provided in section
5.0 of this ordinance, and with the public health, safety and general welfare.
The items which follow will be reviewed by the staff in their analysis of your request. Please complete
this form and provide additional information which will assist the County in its review' of your request.
If you need assistance filling out these items, staff is available.
What is lheComprchcnsive Plan designation for this property? (~pp .<It-t- .<IC"npo)
How will the proposed special use affecl adjacent properlY?
(See attached)
How will the proposed special use affect thc character of the district surrounding the property?
(See attached)
"~
How is the use in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance? (See attached)
How is the use in harmony with the uses permiued by right in the district? (See attached)
What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of the Zoning Ordinance apply lO this use? (See attached)
How willlhis use promote the public health. safety. and general welfare of the community? (See attached)
,~,
14
~county 01' AIlJernarlel. .:.
OFFICE USE ONLY
SPit
Department of Building Code an
TMP L.t .l. g .Q.. . -1L L . ~ 2
ATTACHMENT A
PAGE 1
Signlt
.~ Mag.Disl.~ Staff
UUle
Applic~tion for Special Use Permit
I'roject Name (huw .huuld we ",fer "'lIli.applicatiun?) Tr; rnn pr.s CVR 14 BE (Pac:;tors)
.Existing Use ~~IL~..J.
Prop~sed' Use wireless telecc:mnunications facility
.Zoning District RA
(.staff will assist you with these items)
Number of acres to be covered by Special Use Permit (Ir.pnrtlonll......lbedelln..led nil plul)
.Zoning Ordinance Section number requested
23.001
Is this an amendment to an existing Special Use Permit?
Are you submitting a site development plan with this application?
o YesQ{No
o YesO!No
Contact Person (Whom should we call1wrilc conccming lhis project?)~a 1 AT; A W. T onq, Esq. (McGuireWoods LIP)
Address P.O. Box 1288 City Charlottesville State VA Ziif.2902
Daytime Phone (804 .) 977-2545
Fax# 804-980-2265
E-mailvlong~guirewoods.lc(
Owner of land (As listed in the County's records): David T. Pastors
Address 452 Half Mile Branch Road
City Crozet
State VA Zip 22932
Daytime Phone ( 804) 823-5545
Fax #
E-mail
Applicant (Who is the contact pcrson reprcscllting?Who isrcqucsting the spccial use?): Crown Communications, rnc.
Address 5372 Fallowater Lane. Suite C
City R;anok"t
State VA Zip 25014
Daytime Phone ( 540') 725-6069
Fax # 540-725-7773
E-mail
Tax map and parcel Tax Map .55. Parcel 93
Branch Road, Crozet, VA 22932
Location of property C1andmarks.inlerscctions,orOlhcr) site is adiacent to 1-64 before the intersection
with Route 584. Take U.S. Route 250 West. Just before the interstate, turn right
onto Yancy Mills Rd. At. road's end turn left, then right onto Half Mile Branch Rd.
d6~~Yinf~n~foF&W~ro~nl&J:&r Ifd~~Shy ownership interest in) any abutting property? If yes, please list
those tax map and parcel numbers Map S'5, Parcel 190: Tax Map 55. Parcel 93A:
Par el 3B1
Physical Address (if assigned) 452 Half Mile
-,
OFFICE USE ONLY
ree amount $ Date Paid
Check II Recciptlt
o ZMAs and Proffers:
By:
~.
History:
o Special Use Permits:
o Variances:
Concurrent review of Site Development Plan?
o Letter of Authorization
DYes 0 No
13
401 McIntire Road .:. Charlottesville, VA 22902 .:. Voice: 296-5832 .:. Fax: 972-4126
,t: ATTACHMENT A
Describe your request in detail andinc1ude all pertinent information such as the num
involved in the use, operati!!g hours, and any unique features of the use: (See attached) PAGE 3
/~,
~.
ATIACHMENTS REQUIRED - provide two(2) copies of each:
~
1.
Recorded plat or boundary survey of the property requested for the rezoning. If there is
no recorded plat or boundary survey, please provide legal description of the property and
the Deed Book and page number or Plat Book and page number.
~
2. ,
Note: If you are requesting a special use permit only for a portion of the property, it
needs to be described or delineated on a copy of the plat or surveyed drawing.
Ownership information - If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of legal
entity or organization including, but not limited to, the name of a corporation, partnership
or association, or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious name, ~ document acceptable to
the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing below has the authority
to do so.
~.
If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be
submitted containing the owner's written consent to the application.
If the applica~t is the agent of the owner, a documen! acc~ptable to the County must be
submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency.
OPTIONAL ATIACHMENTS:
~
3.
4.
Drawings or conceptual plans, if any.
Additional Information, if any.
I hereby certify that I own the subject property, or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in
filing this application. I also certify that the information provided is true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
JM_w:dU~
Signature
Va/M", !1J. Wf1.j
Printed Name .
r '/{g-OeJ
Date
%Dtf~ 97 7r26f5
Daytime phone number of Signatory
.~
15
ATTACHMENT A
PAGE 4
Triton PCS CVR 348E (Pastors)
What is the comprehensive plan designation for this property?
Rural
How will the proposed special use affect adjacent property?
The proposed 99' wood pole will not adversely affect adjacent property, as the
pole and antennas will be only 7 feet above the tallest tree in the area, and will be
virtually invisible from adjacent property.
How will the proposed special use affect the character of the district surrounding
the property?
The proposed facility is not inconsistent with the existing development in the
area, since it will not generate additional. traffic or. development, and preserves the
character of the area. Because the area surrounding the property is wooded and the
proposed pole and antenna will be within the trees and only minimally visible, the
character of the district surrounding the property will not be affected.
How is the use in harmony with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance?
The proposed facility is consistent with the County's preference for wood pole
structures, which extend slightly above the treetops. In addition, wireless
telecommunications services provide a public service to the community by creating a
"convenient, attractive and harmonious community," consistent with the intent of the
Zoning Ordinance.
How is the use. in harmony with the uses permitted by-right in the district?
The proposed tower will not restrict the current uses or other by-right uses
available at this site or by-right uses on any other property.
What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of the zoning ordinance apply
to this use?
Section 5. L 12, which outlines public utility structures and uses.
How will this use promote the public health, safety and general welfare of this
community?
The proposed facility will provide increased and improved wireless services to
this portion of Albemarle County, especially emergency communications.
Describe your request in detail and include all pertinent information such as
numbers of persons involved in the use, operating hours, and unique features of the
use:
Triton PCS, Inc. ("Triton") proposes to construct, maintain and manage a wireless
telecommunications facility on property owned by David T. Pastors, identified as tax map
parcel 55-190. The facility would be comprised ofa wooden pole with flush-mounted
~ antennas, along with the necessary transmitting and receiving equipment.
16
ATTACHMENT A
PAGE 5
Triton operates a Personal Communications Service (PCS) system, providing the
most technological advanced wireless communications throughout Southeastern United
States. Triton and AT&T Digitial PCS have undertaken a joint venture to expand the
AT&T digital PCS network to over 11 million people in Virginia, South Carolina, North
Carolina ad Georgia, Triton is a member of the AT&T Digital Wireless Network,
licensed to. cover more than eighty percent of the United States. AT&T Digital PCS
provides convenient and secure mobile communications, combining voice, messaging
and paging communications in a single phone.
---.
Triton has entered into a lease agreement with the property owners for a 125x125
lease area with the facility located entirely within this area. The facility will be accessed
by an existing driveway and by an existing cleared path through the property, which will
be slightly extended to reach the lease area. The location of the extension of the access
was carefully designed to avoid the need to remove any mature vegetation, In addition,
the lease area itself is within an existing small clearing. The facility will emit no noise,
odor or glare. Nor will it interfere with television and radio reception in the surrounding
areas. The facility will not be lit, unless required by the FAA
To develop its network, Triton has divided the Basic Trading Area region into
small geographic sections ("cells"), Each "cell" site holds the equipment that provide the
air interface to the subscriber units and must be precisely located relative to other "cells"
to create a reliable communications grid system. This grid system must reflect the
topography and traffic (use population and building density) of the "cells" as well as the
radius of the respective antenna's reliable transmission area.
~,
Triton's FCC license requires it to operate its system in a defined service region
using designated radio frequencies. Each site must be precisely located relative to other
facilities within the network to ensure that Triton complies with the terms of its license.
The network requires a facility at this location to avoid a gap in service to this portion of
Albemarle County,
Triton carefully selected and designed the proposed facility to provide a structure
that provides adequate height and range of coverage, while meeting the goals of the
community by minimizing the impact of the proposed facility on adjacent or nearby
properties. Location of the facility on this parcel will enable Triton to construct the
facility without the need to remove any mature vegetation, and with only a minimal
amount of grading and clearing.
Following Triton's investigation of the properties in the geographic area, we have
concluded that there are no existing structures within a reasonable distance of the location
that are feasible for collocation and would also meet Triton's engineering requirements,
The subject parcel is zoned Residential/Agricultural. The surrounding properties
within 2000' of the proposed facility are primarily used for rural residential and
agricultural purposes. The tract ofland on which the site is located contains 7.363 acres.
Mr. Pastor also owns two parcels to the north of the facility (tax map parcels 55-93A and
r--,
2
17
ATTACHMENT A
PAGE 6
55-93B) and the parcel to southwest of the facility (tax map parcel 55-19), which are all
zoned RA.
A surveyor has estimated the tallest trees within 25' of the proposed facility to be
92' ,We are requesting a 99' pole to enable the signal from the antenna to extend over
and beyond these two taller trees. We have also conducted a visual impact analysis with
a balloon to demonstrate that the facility will only be minimally visible from the Entrance
Corridor and surrounding properties. A photograph depicting this information is included
with this application. .
The facility was designed to strictly comply with the County's proposed wireless
design manual. The antenna panels will be flush-mounted to the pole and will not extend
above the top of the pole. The pole will retain its natural wood color (dark brown) and
the antenna panels, equipment cabinet and cables will all be painted to match the color of
the pole. In addition, the concrete pad will be tinted earth tone to blend in with its
surrounding wooded area. The design and the siting of the facility will minimize its
visibility from surrounding properties, as it will blend in with the existing tree canopy in
the area.
Once constructed, the facility will be visited approximately one time per month
for routine maintenance checks. The facility will not impact the provision of services by
Albemarle County.
Most importantly, due to its design and precise location, the facility will be only
minimally visible for a very short distance along Interstate 64, and will be nearly
invisible from all other roads, properties and residences.
\\REA\37265.1
~
3
18
ATTACHMENT A
PAGE 7
LIMITED AUTHORIZATION TO Acr As ApPLICANT
AND AUTHORIZATION To
SUBMIT LAND USE ApPLICATIONS
/"""..
Dw(~ T Pasb's
does hereby authorize Valerie W. Long,
Crown Communications Incorporated, Triton PCS, Incorporated, and/or representatives
thereof, to represent [)avid r: Qr:)erSbefore any municipal or County Government
for the sole purpose of obtaining land use permits and/or variances as may be required for
Cro'Ml Communications Incorporated and/or Triton PCS, Incorporated to place
telecommunications towers, antennas, transmission lines, mounting devices and other
related equipment on the property of -IXwf e., T ~S
at I~ Aw~ FMf'vl {larMap Pl/'(Jf!} 55-'13)
located
This authorization shall specifically include the right to submit land use
applications on behalfof . /):Lu/~d 7: H1SmiS
/""".
, including, but not limited to
applications for special use permits, certificates of appropriateness, and variances.
WITNESS the following signature:
~/P~
Date:
g -1.. i-at>
\\REA \25983,2
('
\
\"........-
19
V"
_v
Vv
J"
ATTACHMENT A
PAGE 8
i
62
fI[ 1489PGO J
"At N13r 0. 7I'IIIUn'
r.. 1I,1'a.."
a& ,.. fIC./M
GDtKAL 1IDTt5.
.........................................
.1. OVIllh IMYII> T. "ASTDIIS.
2. OED IIOOIC ~I
D.'. 1.7. JIG. ,,.; D.8. JtI6". 'G. "1
D. B. lt~ l'G. '1 D. I. U~.'G. 'U
3. IlII~III! SETl.tQ5: FliOlIT- ~'. 51PE- ~',
ItAI- ~'. i.l5EIIDT Z S.
4. ONI..O~ ILICTtJC.
,. 1. R. r.. 1l101l I\Ob FOuIll. .
6. }.". Ie.. nOlI "IN FOuIlD.
1. "lIOJI'C'r lollS rtlllIl TlfE 50lmI 1Ch IllY~..II.
lIATSltiIID. _
'0 TlUS P'INrPHDOtS IUT ~It II 411 AlrD
DISlGlI.l'YG .u;' ZIlIE "A" n.. 'ltA11"UlO1) PUllIl
AS ... oa F'El)EJt.u. n"lOO _AlS ll1SU1A.tt IIAPS
DATD DSC. Ii. 1,... WlII\IIJITT I'uu. ,
~l_ II,. ..
,. ~ LD'IS CDlTAD loT l.E&ST 3e.... t.'. or-
COftIGIUOUS AIIEA II SUlPES DF u:s:s TWAI ~x.
1..2.\ , ZI ARE 1"0 A~ STAl"t ROUTE I'1IOlI ~.
ACC1:15 &6SDDT O&Y.
U. Ie,.. LOT lAY Ie rvll11lD SUlDI"lDD.
J2. TlIE UD USE ImUUTZlaIS USJD IIIlIaI A&E IlIJ'QSEl)
r ........... 10 TU .ltpll411l' QMITy ZDlx.J &la>IJWICr
XI D'nCr GI tillS DAft &lID .. __ ,. II/FQlUTlOll
/IUID"aa. ~J.11IU AU mT lInTalc:TX'IIt CZl\'DIAIn5
lIUIIUI .,11'11 ,. LAID AND 'nIID iPt'UIWII::E ~ ftII:
I1.AT:z.s IDf 11'111IIIII na :a.,.. l'lIP ~ SUCll.
13. OIlLflall DWII.I:.UlIUUT'pg LIlt Q11DIr I'UlUIIIG
CllaIlAClI &I'P'IIOYAL. ,
1.. "1' ...If.ta.IQAD lIIU,. P1lO9111E M".,,, r ACC:SSS AS
1lI1lU1_ "$a:. 1'-:\6 I:lF' ~ U -... r COlRI'n CIlIlE.
:..-
~
s
"~-.u.D e
,.,.." .lAlW
r..... ~.,
DJI. torr. ~ as
PLAT.SHOWING A SUBDIVISION
OF 25.151 ACRES
TAX MAP 55, PARCEL 93
LOCATED ON STATE ROUTE 684
WHITE HALL DISTRICT
ALBEMARLE COUNTY. VA.
,~
I
-
20
3CO 100
~ il
100 0 1"0
~ roM#' ..1Ir1
--~
ra...... ~.............. ..... tow --- ..,,,It f
................-.........." r~~
---...--."-..J.: ~!f 'J' .~ . ~8Y
.. '. ,..... _____...AI .....
. ......,__.,--'..~...._..~ .?.....O? ~: '"
v .... v\) ... ,;,H,,;y\)V
/~,. ~:; I/V. l
/, I ..
, ......,...
. ~I ~
~:
'" Rd
.-c if 2.
- \
",",..m- (l. f'r'7'J/t'f I
1''' as. ~ " __
QA ,",~/" ......-..-3~ :; ~<mrr
J .r "''l ~ - fIUr
I .
I I NtH"H' "
5"
~ H ~!:.
. ...1 " UN
~ . TJ ,1'lCL 45
?/l 0.. ~1'lJ."
aDIEll4t. 1IOtES:
............ ..................~..~........
&. o.tID. DAVID ';'. P'ASTOItS.
2. DUD... tETERPCES:
D... 1167, rG. '''' 0.1. 1"7. ~. '9&
D." &4$. N. S; D... H46. ~. ,U
3. .liUblJIE stTIo\a51 FIOIT. ~'.S%Di. ~'.
WtAlI. ~'. EASEI\Pl ~.'.
t. OlE', OYQllUII 5LECTlflC:,
~. I.l.,.- 1~ ROD FOUND.
,. t. t. ,. - 11011 '1"I'OUIID;
7, ~~ECT LJES lIJTNn THE samt <CIIt1 Ill"'"U
WA1'DSIIR. .
IIIA'G A S"'8'n/\n~/Q'A' e. TH15 fItOfEJITY DOCS 1IOT ut 111 ... ..:lEA'
PLAT ~ ,,,.. ~, 1.'1 "'007''1 Dl:$ll;11&TD ~ ZDIIE eA- .(1" TUIt n.aoo /'UllU
C'oES AS SIfCMI OIl JVIlW. F'LDOIl ...n :JlSUlIAltU 1\4"S
OF 25. ~"' DATa Dtt. U.. 1,... COIIlllml'fT "'ilD. ,
51_ .1,. ..
TAX AM ; PARCEL 93 ,. ALL imS CZlIITI.1. AT LUST 31." $.'. OfF.
" COKTlGUDU5 AIIlA III st.on:S CI' LGS nc.. zZ.
LOCATED j!\TE ROUTE '84 '..ZA & 21 AlE 11) ACQ$5 S7.An ROUTr 11lOII :II'
WHITE' HA rrRlCT' Ar:c:IS$ I.\!iIlIEn 0111.1.
, - VI' Lt. IIEITID LOT MY It nRl1'llD SUlDnlDCP.
ALBEMAR "'", " .... ~ TIlE UID USE asGuLATIOll$ LISTED _II '.1: IJ1f'OSED
t' PUI5IIAIIr 10 'T1IE ALIDA..... c:.clIIITT ZUllI. llRDllWICZ
U IFF'IICT CII TIllS DAn AD AlE SIIOn ". I"""Tlt1l1
.1100 tOIl ~. CIIl.T.T2tET ... lOT IGfIJc:T1'1i COYDIAm
-==- ~ : ~ 1UIIIIl. ._lnt TIlE L.\IID ... 'nCIR .a11'baua: ON ll!JS
~ 1\.AT: 15 lOT IIT11D1i:D 1'0 IIIi'QS Tlli:I A5 SUOl.
zoo -, fIOO 3. _':ClIIIllISLl.1IG UlIT PSI LOT -UIGIf ,"UllilllG
~,., !: ....,. If. ~ CIlUISS1<11. AnImAL. .
4. nus l"IJY.&'nO ,1QA:l ifILL l'IOYlbt IEASUUIU: Aca:ss a;
IlAUllID IT SEC. a-!6 OF' TKt ALIElIAJR.t COlU'ATT ~.
o.w. ."... . . ~
n........,~ --~...."..'--- w.. ~ r .....LoT If Q ~
--- .. ...........--~ ~~ ""I-:
.. ....... "" ' ...... ,...., &'. II AP 0<1' ~
· .. .. ..... . ""............. . f'lJ :t ~
.. ... ". ~I II .. ....., fff.,............ :t ~ ~. 1< Y
(j' ). p~ B -I- ~ ~ IN'Ol;r.c,~"ml .
~ /" -~ v.~C'J ~lJT<I'nOIt:o
-, "-c: m'ft:It L qr. ~
"'-..... --~ .....[. LIIND PLANNERS
- - - ~", U;! lt7.5 . P.O, he l~'
~ ~ OIM!otI.",vjlle. V. :z::'IQZ
{1L'4)9'l1.e3)9
S4-07~
ATTACHMENT A
PAGE 9
-
..--
:.-~,
./
~,
.
,
21
.......\. _I.
,;, ..,,j-.; 1
i.I"..;;;o"",,,,'"
I
I
!
ATTACHMENT A
MtGulreWOclcb LLr
COurt Square Bulldlns
310 FoIJMh Stn!et N.f., Suite 300
P.O, b 12.88
i11e, VA 22902-1288
?i'lone: 804.977.2500
Fall: 804,&60.2222
www.mtlPolirewoods.com
Dlre:t1:9~.~;:~ McGUIREWCDDS
PAGE 10
vlo"g~mcgulrewood5,cQm
DIrect fal{: 804.980,.2265
September 15, 2000
VIA FASC1MILE
Mr, Stephan Waller
Planner
Albemarie County Department of Planning
&. Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesvill., VA 22902
Re:
i
I
SP 00.51 Pastors (Crown Communications) !
i
!
~
Ivwl
cc: Dale Finocchi. Crown Communications
\\REA'39724.1
~,
22
23
SECTION 55
71
SAMUEL MILLER AND
WHITE HALL DISTRICTS
~
...
-=-=-
j
'I
Ii
J:
Ii
;1
I,
IJ
u
SCALE IN FEET
SEE 56 ' 14
~,
il56
71
ALBEMARLE
(~
c
~
~
~
~
~
~
z
Z
y
?
o
"
z
~
~
!
~
i
~-~
I
I
~JCROWN@)S!~ I
..... COMMUNICATIONS ~ I
I
99' WOOD MONOPOLE
1O'x12' CONCRETE PAD WI EOl.JFM:NT
ANT9t4A RAD CENTER · 99'
Z~ DRAWN3S
SCCS-S
AIC
ADJ
Af"
APPRQX
ASTM
AIR CONDITIONING
ADJUSTABLE
ABOVE FINISH FLOOR
APPROXIMATELY
AIIERiCAN SOCIETY fOR
TESTING AND MATERIALS
AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE
BUilDING
BLOCK
BASE MOBilE RADIO
BUILDING STANDARD
CEIUNG
ClEAR
CONCRETE
CONSTRUCTION
CONTINUOUS
DOUBLE
DiAMETER
DlAGONAl
OIMENSION
DOWN
OETAIL
DRAWING
EAST
EACH
ELEVATION
ELECTRICAL
EQUAL
EQUIPMENT
EACH WAY
EXISTING
EXTERIOR
FINISH
FLUORESCENT
'LOOR
FOOT
GAUGE
GALVANIZE(D)
GENERAl CONTRACTOR
GROUND
GYP$Utvt WALL SOARD
GYPSUtvt BOARD
HARDWOOD
HORIZONTAL
HOUR
HEIGHT
HEATING. VENTING &:
AIR CONDITIONING
INSIDE QIA.
INCH
INI="QRMATION
INSULATION
INTERIOR
POUND(S)
YAX1MUM
MECHANICAL
~ET AL
MANUFACTURE~
MGR
MIN
tvtl$C
N
NA
NIC
NTS
OC.o/e
00
OPG
OPP
PL'rWD
PR
PROJ
PROP
PT
REQ'O
RM
RO
lWlAGER
MINIMUM
MISCEu.ANEOUS
NORTH
NOT APPUCABlE
NOT IN CONTRACT
NOT TO SCALE
ON CENTER
OUTSIDE DIAMETER
OPENING
OPPOSITE
PL yWOOO
PAIR
PROJECT
PROPERTY
PRESSURE TREATED
REOUIRED
ROOM
ROUGH OPENING
SOUTH
SHEET
SIMILAR
SPECIFICATION
SQUARE
STAINLESS STEEL
STEEL
STRUCTURAL
SUSPENDED
SHEET VINYL
THROUGH
TlNNEO
TOP Of CONCRETE
rop . 01=" MASONRY
TYPICAL
.A,WG
BLDG
BLK
BMR
BIS
CLG
CLR
CONC
CONST
CONT
OBL
OIA, 0
OIAG
OIM
DN
OTL,DETL
DWG
E
EA
El.ElEV
ELECT
EQ
EQUIP
EW
EXIST
EXT
FlN
fLUOR
RR
"
GA
GALV
GC
GRND
ewe
GYP BO
HARO'WD
HQRIZ
HR
HT
HVAC
10
IN
INFO
INSUL
!NT
LB(S)
MAX
MECH
MET,MTl
'''R
S
SHT
SIM
SPEC
SQ
SS
STL
SmUCT
SUSP
$V
THRu
TNND
TOC
TOM
TYP
UBC
UNO
UNIFORU BUILDING
CODE
UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE
VERTICAL
vERIFY IN FlELD
VINYL TelE
VERT
V'"
VT
W
WI
WIN
wID
WP
WEST
WITH
WINDOW
WITI-lOljT
WATERPROOF
"
&
"-
If.
o
.
ANGLE
AND
CENTER UNE
PROPERTY LINE
AT
NUMBER
& REVISION
<I> KEY NOTE
~ ROOM NUMBER
!W 'EYED NOTE
@- OE!).ll qEFERENCE
@ ELEVALOIll REFERENCE
~ SECTiON REfERENCE
~
~
- .._-------~.
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS-
~
o2wireless Solutions
1015 AVIATION PKWY. STE 700
MORRISVILLE. Ne 27560
(919) 469-9426
'AX (919) 469-9967
SlJ1!llmll!
IlAlZER ASSOCIATES
1208 CORPORATE CIRCLE
ROANOKE, VA 24018
JOHN McCAOEN
(540) 772-9580
'AX (540) 772-8050
~
o2wirelen Solutions
1015 AVIATION PKWY. STE 700
MORRISVlLLE, NC 27560
(919) 469-9426
FAX (919) 469-9967
GEOTECHNiCAl
FROEHlING & ROBERTSON, INC.
1734 SEIREL DRIVE. N.E.
ROANOKE. VA 24012
(S40) 344-7939
'AX (540) 344-3657
i
I
I
I
I
=:j
CONSULTANT TEAM
PROJECT ~
CONSTRucnoN l.W4ACER:
NEtWORK OPERAnONS WANAGER:
NA.norw. DIRECTOR MANAGER:
APPROVED BY
Il.ANOOWNEft
LANDOWNER APPROVAl.
DATE
DATE
MUNICIPAl. APPROVAl.
DATE
1--
DATE
SITE NAME:
YANCEY MillS
~
CROZET MILLS
~
CVR-348E
~ITE ADDRESS
452 1/2 MILE BRANCH ROAD
CROZET, VA 22932
SIIE..Jll!!lEB
DAVIO T. PASTORS
452 1/2 MILE BRANCH ROAD
CROZET, VA 22932
(804) 823-66<5
~
CROWN COMMUNICATIONS, ING.
375 SOUTH POINT Bl VO
CANONSBURG. PA 15317
(724) 416-2000 - Phone
(724) 416-2200 - Fa,
lELEfllQMI;
SPRINT
2211 HYDRAUUC ROAO
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VA 22901
ATTN, ENGINEERING DEPT.
(804) 971-2211
POWER
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC POWER CO. (VEPCO)
1 719 HYORAUUC ROAD
CHARlOTIESVlllE. VA 2290 I
ATTN: KAREN RODCERS
(804) 97Z-6794
GENF:RAI INFORMATION
LATITUDE - 38'02'50.863.'
LONGITUDE - 78'4J'49.615~
ELEVATION -.705.8'
ZONING ClASSIFICATION
RA
ZONING JURISDICTION
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
PARt":F"l IIIUUAF'R
55-93
PA
DB 1146. PG 511
EtJERGEIIlCY NUYBER
911
tJAGISTERlAL DISTRICT
IVY
PROJECT SUMMARY-~-.
1/2 MILE BRANCH ROAD
SITE #: CVR- 348E
SITE ECHO #: 801821
J.D. EDWARDS #: 13980
452 1/2 MILE BRANCH ROAD
eROlET, V A 22932
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
~
:~
~r
I
I
fAa.l!Q.
EEIM
FLOOD ZONE C
~
COMMUNITY PANEL I:
510006-0205B
E'FECTIVE DATE:
DECEMBER 16, 1980
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT DESCRIPTION I
THE PROJECT INCLUDES:
'~;~,"" ~ . ",,,. ~~~ ,m _/ '''Mm-I
IN$TALI.ATION OF A 99' ~O.HIGH \lQNOPOlE 1
WITH TWO PANEL ANTENNAS (ONE PER SECTOR). !
I
I
I
A NEW TELEPHONE SERVICE RUN TO SITE
A NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE RUN TO SITE
NO WATER SUPPLY OR SEWAGE RUN TO SITE
SITE DIRECTIONS
PROM CROWN-CASTLE COMMUNICATIONS TAKE
INTERSTATE 561 NORTH TO INTERSTATE 81 NORTH.
TAKE INTERSTATE 8t NORTH TO INTERSTATE 64 EAST
TO CHARLOTTESVILLE. CONTINUE ON INTERSTATE 64
EAST TO EXIT fil07, WHICH IS ROCKFISH GAP
TURNPIKE (S.R. 250). MAKE A LEFT ONTO S.R. 250
EAST. CONTINUE EAST ON S,R. 250 UNTlL THE F1RSf
ROAD ON THE LEFT, WHlCH IS YANCEY MILLS ROAD.
MAKE L~FT ONTO YANCEY MILLS ROA(). AT ROAD'S END
MAKE A LEFT. THEN FIRST R!GHT ONTO. 1/2 MILE
RAN H ROA DRIVEWAY TO SITE. lSTH[. JRD
DRIVEWAY ON THE lEFT. CONTINUE. UNTlL LANDOWNER'S
DRIVE WHICH IS ON THE LEFT AND IN THE REAR.
ACCESS TO THE SITE WINOS THROUGH SMALL 'NOOOEO
AREA ON AN ACCESS ROAD lEADING TOWARD
INTERSTATF: 64. ACCESS ROAD ENOS APPROXIMATEl i
300 FEET PROM THE SITE. mE SITE 1$ LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 150 ~ET TO THE EAST OF' THE vEPCO
POWER UNEEASEMENT 'Nl-+1CH RUNS ADJACENT TO THE
OWNERS PROPERTY. AN ESCORT TO THE sm: IS
NECESSARY.
PROJECT DESCRPTlQN
n_~____]
~
BEFORE YOU DIG !
CAll UTILITY
LOCATION SERVICES.
'T'S THE LAW !
MISS UTILITY
. -800-552-7001
\
SHEET NUMBER ~
T-l PROJECT INFORMATION, VICINITY MAP,
SHEET INDEX .
C-1 GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFlGATIONS
C-2 SITE SURVEY
CIVIL DRAWING
C-3 SITE CLAN
C-4 SITE DETAIL PLAN
C-l) SITE ELEVATIONS
C-6 GRADING P!..AN
C-7 SITE ::ETAILS
ANAl. DRAWING
NOT RElEASED
FOR COHSTR\JCTlOH
OAT[; 8/'/00
SHEET INDEX
ATTACHMENT
PAGE 1
/'
.' -::?\.JV
- -:\.
}-;;/ '. .
, V
\r'~~:i""'" ;::(i. ~
';:C1<AL'<>"7V \
~..,,~/
ALL JAAWIN(;S .i.NO wRfTTEN MATERW. (
HEREIN ARE THE PROPERTY OF E
ANO !MY NOr BE DUPUCATEO. to'SEO OR
WITHOUT mE 'Nf?ITTEN CONSENT Of !
~
. o2wireless Soli
SOUTHEAST REGIC
1015 AVlAll0N PARKWA'I
SUITE 700
MORRISVILLE. NC 27560
Phone: (919) 469-9426
Fax; (919146~9961
RElf.ASE
O"TE
6/20/00 ISSUED FOR ~E'J1EW
7/2./00 !S$UED roR ZONING
.RE\'ISIONS
NO. QATE
& 6/9/00 REVISED PER CROI
&
.:'1
.&
&
nus ORAWlNG 1$ COPmICHTEO AND IS
PROPERlY Of' THE OW~Ett IT is P
S(Ulf rOR USE ftf THE ~R AND ITS
REPRCOUCOON OR USE '}f rKlS DRAWlH
THE 'NFCRa,jATION CONTAJ,"tm ~N IT 1$ f
WITh"OVT 1lI( wRITTEN Pt:.~UI$SlON Of r~
)RAWN 6Y: CHS
.2HECKED BY: BTM
I Silt ~A)J,E
YANCEY Mil
1/2 MILE BRANCH I
! SllE NUUBER
CVR-348E
r S~ i:;: ~OORESS
452 1/2 MILE BRANCH
CROZET, VA 22932
PROJECT INFORMATIC
VICINITY MAP.
SHEET INDEX
I SHEET NUMBER
-=
T-1
,
: PL':';~ SGfl,j.::
24
(-
c
f
~..
! DIVISION 1
~
STANDARD PROVISIONS
I
.
~
1'5,
~
~
,
'"
'T
~
~
i
~
~
o
~
tl
~
J
GENERAL NOTES
1. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED. THESE PLANS ARE INTENDED TO BE T)tAG~A~Mt. ~ ~
ONLY THE WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS SHAlL INCLUDE PJRN1$HING '.(AfERLA;..S,
EOUIPJ.tENT AND APPURTENoANCES. AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ,HE WORK
VERIFY ALL EOUIPMENT LOCATIONS WITH PROJECT MANAGER.
2. PRIOR TO SUBMlmNG A BIO. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE ,AND SECOU[
F'AAUUAR WITH All CONomONS AFFECTING THE PROPOSED PROJECT, INCLUDING DEMOUnON.
MECHANICAl AND ElECTRICAl INSTAl.l.ATlONS AND SHALL ADJUST -BID ACCORDINGLY.
J. CONTRACTOR SHAlL VERtfY AU flEW CONDITIONS AND QI-"EN$IONS ON THE .l08 SITE
AND CONFIRM THAT WORK AS INDICATEO ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (ALSO KNOWN
AS CONSTRUcnON PlANS) CAN BE ACCOMPUSHEO AS SHOWN BE~ORE PROCEEDING
4. NOTIFY PROJECT ~AGEQ OF' ANY MAJOR DISCREPANCY REGARDING THE CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS. EXISTING CONDiTIONS. AND OR DESIGN INTENT. THE CONTRACTOR $HAU BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THIS ClARIFICATION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE 'NORK
OR RELATED WORK IN QUESTION.
5. iNSTALL. ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERiALS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS
SPECIFICALLY OTHERWISE INDICATED. OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR REGULATIONS TAKE
PRECEDENCE.
S.CONTRACTOR SHAll VISIT JOB SITE TO REVIEW SCOPE:: OF WORK AND EXISTlNG SlTE
CONDITIONS INCLUDING. 9UT NOT UUIT'ED TO, MECHANICAL SERvtCE. ELECTRICAl. SERViCE
AND OVERALL COORDINAnON.
':'. All TELEPHONE/RADIO EQUIPMENT LAYOUT. SPECIFICATIONS. PERF"ORMANCE. !NST.AlLATION
AND THEIR FINAL LOCATION ARE TO BE APPROVED BY PROJECT t.lANAGER. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL BE ~ESPONSIBLE f'OR COORDINATING HIS WORK WITH THE WORK AND Cl.EARANCE
REQUIRED 6Y OTHERS RELATED TO SAID EQUIPuENT.
8_ ALL 'NORK PERf'ORMED AND MATERfALS SHALL MEET THE HIGHEST TRADE STANDARDS. AS A
YINIMUM STANDARO. CONFORM WITH AlL APPUCABLE COOES, REGULATIONS ANO ORDINANCES
HAVlNC JURISOlcnON. CONTRACTOR SHALL GrvE AlL NOTICES AND COUPL Y wfl}t AlL LAWS.
ORDINANCES. RULES. REGULATIONS AND lAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AllTHORm'
SEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK.
9., ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS SHAlL BE INSTALLED PER N.E.C. AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL
AftPUCABLE UTILIlY COUPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND l0CAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL
CODES. ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS.
~ O. CONTRACTOR SHAU. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS SUPERVISION WHILE ANY SUBCONTRACToRS OR
'NORKWEN ARE ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT ALL 'NORK.
CONTRACTOR SHAlL BE SOlELY RESPONSIBLE FOR AU. CONSTRUCTION MEANS. METl-lOOS,
TECHNIQUES. SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND COORDINATING AU. PORTIONS OF T"'lE
WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT,
'1. PRovIDE' PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A CR
2-A108C WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF "l"HE PROJECT AREA
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
~2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHAU. BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIf'ORN BUILDING CODE (UBC) 1994
EomON. AlONG WITH 199<1 UPC. UMC. AND THE 1994 NEC.
~ 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING f'lNISHES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR
SHAlL REPAIR ANY DAWoCE THAT WAY OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION.
. 4. SEAL All PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED AREAS WITH U.L uSTED OR F.M. APPROVED
YATrRIALS.
IS. DETAILS AND SCHEMATICS ARE TO PROPOSE TO SHOW END RBULT Of' THE DESIGN. ~INOR
MODIFlCA,TIONS MAY DEEM TO BE NECESSARY TO SUIT JOB CONOITIONS ANO DIMENSIONS.
SUCH YODIFICATIONS SHAll. BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE WORK.
16. VERIFY AU. FINAL EQUIPMENT lOCATIONS WITH OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE.
~ 7. DIMENStON$ ARE TO FINISH SURF"ACES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED,
16. CLEANUP AND SAFETY: KEEP PROJECT AREA CLEAN, HAZARO FREE. AND DISPOSE OF AlL
DIRT, DEBRIS. RUBBISH AND EQUIPMENT REUOVED AND NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING THE
PROPERTY OF THE OWIIER. ETC, LE.<VE PREMISES IN A VACUUM ANO BROOM ClEAN
CONDITION: FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR $UUDGES OF ANY NATURE. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING All SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT IN A
CLEAN WORKING OROER UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT B'f PROJECT ""NAGER.
19. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESpoNSIBLE FOR REDLlNING TliE cONSTRUcnON PlANS TO
ILLUSTRATE THE AS~8UILT CONDITION OF THE SITr. THIS WILL BE !lONE AFTER THE SITE
HAS BEEN AWARDED THE FINAL INSPECTION.
TWO (2) COPIES OF REOUNEO DRAWINGS WILL BE PROVIDED TO PROJECT MANAGER AND
THE ENGINEER, (I EACH)
DIVISION 2: SITE WORK-02100
OARTHWORK AND DRAINAGE
PART T GENERAL
~ _ WORK INCLUDED
A. REFER TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SITE PlAN FOR .~ORK iNCLUDED.
~. RELATrD _ORK
A. CON$1RUC!lON OF BUIlDING FOUNDATION
B. INST .l.UATlQN OF UTILITY &: GROUNDING SYSTEM
C, ERECTION OF FENCE
J OESCRIPT10N$
A. ACCESS ROAD. TURNAROUND AREAS. AND SITES ARE CONSTRUC'TD TO ?qoVIDE A 'NELL
DRAINED. EASILY MAINTAINED, EVEN SURFACE FOR MATERIAl AN:) EOUIP~ENT DEliVERIES AND
MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL ACCESS.
.a.. OUALt!Y .\SSURANCE
01.. ~PlY SOil STERILIZER 111I ACCORDANCE WITH MANUF"ACTURER'S ~ECOMt...AE"'DATlON (USE ~
'EEDED).
S. GRASS SEEDS SHALL BE APPLIED AND MAINTAINED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE SED
PQOOUCEQ (If' REOUIRED).
C_ VEGETATION LANDSCAPING. IF INCLUDED WITHIN THE CONTRACT. "'ILL 9E oLACED AND
MAlNTA.INED AS RECOMMENDED BY NURSERY INDUSTRY STANDA.RC"S (IF REQUIRED).
5. SEQuENCING
,~_ CONf'IRM SURVEY STAKES AND SET ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO ANY .:ONSTRucnON
9. THE COMPLETE ROAD MO SITE ARfA WlllSE GRUBBED PRIOR "'0 rOUNQAnON
CONSTRUCTION OF PLACEMENT OF BACK FILL OR SUB-BASE 'dA.TERI.A.L.
C. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ZONE ACCESS DRI\/[
D. THE SITE .AREA WILL BE BROuGHT TO SUB-BASE COURSE ElE\ATlON AND THE ACCESS ROAD
ro BASE COURSE ELEVATION PRIOR TO F"ORMING FOUNDATION.
E. APPLY SOil STERILIZER PRIOR TO PLACING BASE MATERIALS.
L GRAOE. SEED FERTILIZER AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS IMUEO~A,TELY AFTtR BRINGING SITE
AND ACCESS ROAD TO BASE COURSE ElEVATION. WATER TO Er...SURE CROWTH.
G. REMOVE CRAvEl FROM TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ZONE TO ~N ~lj'T1-IORIZE ARE:.. JR AS
DIRECTEO_.3Y. PROJECl UANACER.
"<\P~lY THREECJ) INCHES OF" 1/4 INCH STONEv~O ALL ~RAVE~DfJ~~~; :'(~E~i"'T~i~~~'vEL
o"....f:l,A[NT i)[TAlL)
<\FTER 4PPUCATIONS Of' FINAl SURFACES, APPLY SOIL STERIUZ~R TO ro-iE STONE SURFACES.
o
o
"
a>
'Xl
6. SUBJ.Am..\lS
~, eEF'ORE . CONSiRUcnON
1. IF' lANDSCAPING IS APPUCA8LE TO THE CONTRACT. TWO COPIES or T'r-lE LANDSCAPE PLAN
UNDER NURSERY LETTERHEAD. IF' A LANDSCAPE ALLOWANCE I<IAS ~NClUDro IN :tiE
CONTR6.CT. AN rT(MIZEO UsnNG OF PROPOSED COSTS UNDER NURSERY LETTERHEA.O
(REF~R TO SITE PLAN rOR LANDSCAPING REOUlREMENTS)
J.. SUBMIT f'OR APPROVAl. 1/2 CUBIC FOOT OF TI-lE PROPOSE:, S:JRFACE:OURSE MA'!'[RIAl.
3. ~ER CONSTRUCTION
~. IolANU;:-.1,crUR(R'S DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT AND WARRANT) ST'\TE~E!\lT ON SOl;' STERILIZED.
~- I,I"'Nl.FA.CT~:RER'.S DESCRIPTION Of' PROOUCT ON GRASS AND <;:::RT1L'Zt~
,) i......I'4DSCAPING WARRANTY STATEUENT
7. WARRANTY
A. IN. ADDmON TO ,HE 'NARRANTY eN !l.ll CONSTRUCTION. COVERED 1"4 "'7"J,lE ::ONTRACT
DOCUMENTS THE CONTRACTOR St"ALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE AND REPAIR AREA BACK AS CLOSE
TO ORIGINAl. CONDmON AS POSSIBLE TO LEASE AREA PROPERTY OR SURROUNDINC
CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION.
B. SOIL STERIUZATlON APPUCATION WILL GUARANTEE VEGETATION FREE ROAD AND SITE AREAS
FOR ONE YEAR FROM DATE Of fiNAL INSPECTION.
C. DISTURBED AREAS WILL REFLECT GROWTH OF" NEW CRASS COVER PRrOR TO FINAL INSPECTION.
D. lANDSCAPING. lF INCLUDED "NlTlilN THE SCOPE OF THE CONTRACT. WIll BE GUARANTEED FOR
ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF' F'INAL INSPECTION.
PART 2 DEMOUTION
1. DEMOLITION SHAlL BE CONTROLLED ~O PREVENT THE SPREAD OF' OUST TO OCCUPIED PORTIONS
OR THE BUILDING,
2. EXISTING WORl< TO REMlUN SHAlL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. WORl< DAMAGED BY
CONTRACTOR SHAU BE REPAIRED TO MATCH EXISTING WORK.
3. AT THE END or EACH WORK DAY AND OURING INCLEMENT WEATHER. CLOSE ALL EXTERIOR
OPENINGS WITH WEATHERPROOF COvER.
4. REMOVE DEBRIS AND RUBBISH FROM THE SITE DAILY. 00 NOT AlLOW DEBRIS AND RUBBISH
TO ACCUMULATE IN BUIlDING OR ON SITr.
S. FOR FlOOR AND WAlL PENETRATIONS:
A. CONTRACTOR MUST LOCATE REINFORCING BARS IN EXISTING fLOOR SLABS USING A REUABLE
NON~OESTRUCTIVE TrSTING Y(THOD APPROVED BY THE OWNER, CORE DRILL AS NECESSARY
TO AlLOW CABLE PENETRATION '""THOUT CUmNG EXISTING REINF'ORCING BARS.
B. FiLL OPENING AFTER CABLE INSTAlLATION WlTI-1 INSTA-F"OAM.S INSTA-F1RE SfAL SILACONE:
RTV rOAM.
PART .3 PRODUCTS
1. MATERIALS
A. SOIL STERILIZERS
TOTAl KIU PRODUCT 910 - EPA 10292-7
PHASAR CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 5123
DEARBORN. MI 48128 TEL 313 563 ~BOOO
B. ROAD AND SITr MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO VA OOT ROAD ANO
SPECiFiCATIONS JAN. 1994 WHEN REFERENCED TO FlLl MATERiAl -
ACCEPTABLE SELECT FILL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH VA OOT
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATION.
C. SOIL STERILIZER SHAlL BE EPA REGISTERED OF LIQUID COMPQSmON AND OF
PRE EMERGENCE DESIGN.
D. SOIL STASIUZER FABRIC SHAU BE MIRAFI ..:. 50DX
2, EOUIPMENT
A. COMPACTION SHAll BE ACCOMPUSHED BY MECHANICAL MEANS.
1. LARCER ARE'AS SHALl BE: COI.IPACTEO BY SHEEPS f'OOT VIBRATOR OR RUBBER TIRED
ROLLERS WEiGHING AT lfAST FIVE TONS.
2. SMAlLER AREAS SHALL BE CCI,jPACTEO BY POWER-DRIVER. HAND HELD TAMPERS
PART 4 EXECUTION
AMBUSH HERBICIDE - EPA REGISTERED
FRAMAR: INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS
1435 MORRIS A.V[.
UNION. NJ 07063 TEL 800 526-4924
I INSPECTIONS
LOCAl BUILDING INSPECTORS SHAll BE NOTIFIED NO LESS THAN 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE
OF CONCRETE POURS_ UNLESS OTHERWISE SPEClf'lED BY OWNER OR lOCAl JURISDICTION.
2. PREPARATION
A. CLEAR TREES. BRUSH AND DEBRIS FROM SITE AREAS AND ACCESS ROAD RIGHT OF 'NAY
AS OIRECTrO B'f PROJECT IoIANAGER,
B.PRIOR TO OTHER EXCAVATION 'ND CONSTRUCTION EFFORTS GRUB ORGANIC MATrRIAL TO A
MINIMUM OF SIX (6) INCHES BELOW ORIGINAL GROUND L!:\1EL
C. UNLESS OTHERWISE INSTRUCTED BY PROJECT MANAGER TRANSPORT ALL REMOVED TREE.
BRUSH AND DEBRIS FROM THE PROPERTY TO AN AUTI-lORIZED LANDF"ILL..
0, PRIOR TO PlACEMENT OF FILL OR BASE /oIATERIALS, ROLL THE SOIL
E. WHERE UNSTABLE SOIL CONDITiONS ARE ENCOUNTERED, UNE OF" THE GRUBBED AREAS
WITH ST^BllIZER /oIAT PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL OR BASE MATERIAL
3. INSTAllATION
A- THE SITE AND TURNAROUND AREAS SHALl BE AT THE SUB-BASE COURSE ElEVATION PRIOR
TO FORMING FOUNDATIONS. GRADE OR FILL THE SITE AND ACCESS ROAD REOUIRED IN ORDER
THAT UPON EVEN OISTRIBUTION OF SPOILS RESULTING FROM FOUNDATION EXCAVATIONS.
THE RESULTING GRACE Will CORRESPOND WITH SAID SUB-SASE COURSE. ELEVATIONS ARE
TO BE CAlCULATrD FROM FINISHED GRADES OR SLOPES INDICATED,
B. IF ANY. EXCESS SPOILS WILL BE ClEAREO FROM JOB SITE AND NOT SPREAO BEYOND THE
UMITS OF lOOE PROPERTY UNLESS AUTHORIZE BY PROJECT MANAGER / AS ACREEMENT
BY LANOOWNER,
C. THE ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE BROUGHT TO BASE COURSE ELEVATION PRIOR TO FOUNDATION
CONSTRUCTION TO PERMIT uSE. COMPACTION AND OBSERVATION DURING CONSTRUCTION or
THE SITE,
O. AVOIO CREATING DEPRESSIONS WHERE WATER /oIAY POND,
E. THE CONTRACT SHALL BE ASSUMED TO INCLUDE GRADING BANKING. DITCHING AND UNLESS
OTHERWISE INDICATED. COVERING TWO INCHES OF SURFACE COURSE. ALL ROADS OR RouTES
UTlUZED FOR A,CCESS TO THE SITE COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE
NEAREST PUBUC THOROUGHfARE.
F. WHEN IMPROVING AN EXISTING ACCESS ROAD. GRADE THE EXIST1NG ROAD TO REMOVE ANY
ORGANIC. MATTER AND SMOOn-t '!1-IE SURFACE BEFORE PlACING FlLl OR STONE,
G. PlACE f'lll OR STONE IN SIX INCH MAXIMUM AND COMPACT BEFORE PlACING NEXT uFT.
H. THE FlNISH GRADE. INCLUDING TOP SURFACE COURSE. SHAll EXTEND A MINIMUM OF ONE
f'ooT. BEYOND THE SITE F'ENCE AND SHAlL COVER THE AREA AS INDICATED.
I. RIPRAP SHALL BE APPliED TO fliE SIDE SLOPES OF All. FENCED SITE AREAS. PARKING
AREAS. AND TO ALL OTHER SLOPES GREATER THAN 2,1.
J. RIPRAP SHALL BE APPLIED TO r"E SIDES OF OITCHES OR DRAiNAGE SWALES,
K. RIPRAP ENTIRE DITCH f'OR SIX ~EET IN AlL DIRECTIONS AT CULVERT OPENINGS.
L. SEEO fERTILIZER AND STRAW COVER SHAll. BE APPlIEO TO ALL OTHER DISTURBEO AREAS.
ANO OITCHES. DRAiNAGE, SWALES, NOT OTHERWISE RIPRAPPEO.
M. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL DITCHES. SWALES. NOR CULVERTS BE PlACED SO THEY
DIRECT WATER TOWARDS. OR PERI,jIT STANDING WATER IMMEDIATELy ADJACENT TO RAILROAD
BALlAST. IF OESIGNS OR ELEVATIONS CONFLICT WITH THIS GUIOANCE ALVAR SHOULD BE
A()VISEO IUUEDIATELY.
N. IN DITCH LIES wITH SLOPES GROTER THAN TEN PERCENT. MOUND DIVERSIONARY
HEAOWALLS IN THE OITCH AT CuLvERT ENTRANCES. THE HEAOWALL SHAlL BE POSITIONED
AT AN ANGLE NO GREATER Tl-lAN 60 DEGREES OFf' THE DITCH LINE. RIPRAP THEUPsmEAM
SlOE Of' THE HEADWAll AS WE:..i... AS THE DITCH FOR SIX FEET ABOvE THE CULVERT
ENTRANCE.
DIVISION 3: CONCRETE WQRKS-03310
1. aUAUTY ASSURANCE:
COMPLY WITH PROVISIONS OF THE =-OllOWING CODES, SPECIFICATIONS AND. STANDARDS.
EXCEPT WHERE ~ORE STRINGENT REOUIREMENTS ARE SHOWN OR SPECIFIED'
;..:g: 5~~ -~:uI~5iNrgl~~~0~E~~~Et~~TUF"~ ~~~~~~;~~N~~~~~G~~EvISEO 1992)
AND AC1318-89 'COMMENTARY. 'RE\IISED 1992)
C. CONCRETE REINFORCING STEEl ,';;STlTlflc: (CRSI), ~MANUA.l. OF STANDARD PRACTICe:-
2. REINFORCING MATERIALS:
A. RIENFORCING:ASTM A 615.CRACE 60 DEFORMED.
B. WELDING WIRE F"ASRIC:A$TU A :85 WELDED STE~~ W~~~~RIC:.... ..............
SPACING. SUPPORTING AND RE:Nl="ORCING BARS IN PlACE, USE WIRE BAR TYPE SUPPORTS
COMPLYING wITH CRSI SPECIFICATIONS.
3. CONCRETE UATERIAl..$:
A. PORTlAND CEUENT: ASTt.t C 150. TYPE 1.
B. LIGHTWEIGHT AGGREGATES, ASl" 2 330
C. AJR-ENTRAINING AOMIXTUREo ASTM C 260 CERTIFIEO 6Y THE /oIANUFACruRER TO BE
COMPATIaLE wlll-f OTHER REOlJiRED ADMIXTURES.
4. PROPORTIONING. AND DESIGN Of' ~lI:<ES;
DESIGN UIX TO PROVIDE LlGHTWE1G0.4T CONCRETE WITH THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES:
A. 3000 PSI 25-0AY CouPRESSlvE STRENGTH
8. WEICHT: 110 PCF.
C. w/C RATIO: 0.44 UAXIMUU (NO"- AIR-ENTRAINED). 0.35 MAXIMUM (AIR-ENTRAINED)
DIVISION 4: UNIT MASONRY-04220
1. CONCRETE BLOCKS:
A. STANDARD BLOCI< SHALL BE THE SIZE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. UGHT GRAY OR
NEUTRAL COLOR. AND SHALL CONFORM TO ntE REOUIREMENTS Of' ASTM C 1)0. "''fPE I.
GRADE N. UGHT'NEIGHT TYPE WITH EXPAND SlAG AGGREGATE.
2. MORTAR:
A. All ~ORTAf~ FOR CONCRET"E BLOCKS SHALL CONF'QRM TO ASTM C 270. TYPE SAND
$t'fAlL I-lAi.E A. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH Of' 3000 PSI IN 28 DAYS.
J, WIRE REINFOHCING IN BED JOINTS:
A. TRUSS TYPE REINFORCEUENT SHALL BE: OUR-O-WALL. OR EQUAL FABRlCATEO WITH A
SINGLE PAIR OF SIDE AND CONTINUOUS DIAGONAL CROSS-RODS SPACED NOT MORE THAN
8" ON CE:UER. WIRE IN f'ABRICATION SHALL BE GALVANIZED ACCORDING TO ASTM 116.
ClASS 3; SlOE RODS SHALL BE 9 GAGE 3/16" MINIMUM LENGTH SHAll BE 10'-0" WITH
MATCHING CORNER AND TEE UNITS.
B. SPACING: TYPICAL. IN SED JOINTS. AT 16" VERTlCAL INTERVAL. CT OPENINGS: ABOVE AND
C. AT OPENINGS: ABOvE AND BELOW EACH OPENING PLACE REINfORCING IN ONE ,\()OtnONAl
JOINT TO EXTEND J. -0" PAST THE OPENING EACH WAY. SPUCE LENGTHS FOR HORIZONTAl
JOINT REIt-IFORCE'-4ENT SHALL BE AT lEAST 8" FOR TRUSS AND 16" F"OR STRAIGHT TYPE.
4. INSTAU. ST(EL LINTELS ABOVE EACH OPENING. FlLL CORES WITH GROUT .3 COURSES BELOW
LINTEL BEARI'''G.
DIVISION 5: STRUCTURAL STEEL-05120
'. OUALITY ASStRANCE:
cOUP\..Y Wlnl PROVISIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES, SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS.
EXCEPT WHERE MORE STRINCENT REQUIREMENTS ARE SHOWN OR SPECIFIED;
A. AISC "CODE OF STANDARD PRACT1CE".
B, AISC "SPECIFICATION FOR STRUGTURAL STEEL BUIlDINGS ~ ALLOWABLE STRESS
DESIGN AND PLASTIC DESIGN". INCLUDING THE "COMMENTARY. AND SUPPLEMENTS.
C. AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY (AViS) 01_1 -92, "STRUCTURAl WELDING CODE - STEEL"
2. /oIATrRIALS,
A. STRUcTUR.t.L STEEl. PLATES. SHAPES AND BARS: ASTM A .36.
B. HIGH STRENGTH THREADED FASTENERS: ASTNA .325.
C. ELECTRODrs FOR WELDING: E70XX.
D. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHAlL BE GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A 153.
E. CEYENT CROUT, EMBECO B'f MASTER BUIlDERS OF AN APPROVED EOUAL
F. NON-MET'WC, SHRINKAGE-RESISTANT, 4000 PSI ,COMPRESSIVE STRENG1\< GROUT,
PROVIDE ONE OF' THE FOLLOWING OR AN APPROVED EQUAl;
1. [UCO N.S. BY EUCUD CHEMICAl. CO.
2, MASTERtLOW 713 BY YASTtR BUILDERS
DIVISION 7:
SEALANTS AND CAULKING-07900
1. PROVIDE JO"u SEALERS. JOINT FlUERS AND OTHER RELATED MATERIAlS THAT ARE
COMPATIBLE WITH ONE ANOTHER AND WI'1lf JOINT SUBSTRATES UNDER CONDITIONS OF
SERVtCE AND APPLICATIONS. PROVIDE COLORS TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACES. PROVIDE
BlACK OR GTHER NEUTRAL COLOR WHEN NO OTHER COLOR IS AVAILABLE.
2. ONE~COYPO'ENT POLYSULFiOE BASED. ONE PART ElASTOMERIC SEALANT. COMPLYING WI1H
FS TT -S-OC230.ClASS A TYPE " (NON~SAG). FOR JOINTS AT PENETRATIONS THROUGH
EXTERIOR Wo\llS. PROVIDE COMPOUND BEARING THE THIOCOl CHEMICAl CORPORATION SEAL
Of' APPROVAL PROVIDE ONE OF lltE FOLLOWING OR AN APPROVED EQUAL:
A. FtEXISEAL 900 SERIES B'f ON'. INC,
B. HQRNFlEX ONE - COMPONENT By W.R. GRACE .& CO.
J. ONE-COUPONENT ACRYLIC SEALANT: ACRYliC TERPOLYMER. SOLVENT BASED ONE-PART
THERIoIOPIA<;TIC SEAlANT COMPOUNO, SOUOS NOT LESS THAN 95" ACRYlIC, GOMPL YING WITH
FS IT -5-00230. CLASS B TYPE II. FOR PERIMETER OF METAL AND DOOR FRAMES.
THRESHOLDS AT E>'.TERIOR DOORS. ANO PIPE SLEEVES TI-lROUGH EXTERIOR WALLS AND FLOOR
SLABS. PROVIDE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OF AN APPROVED EOUAL:
A. OAP AeRYJC BY DAP. INC,
B. GACO AS-3 B'f GATES ENGINEERINGjSMC
4- OLEO-RESINS CAULKING COMPOUND: OIL BASED RESINOUS CAULKING, COMPLYING WITH
. FS TT -C-598. NON-BLEEDING. PAINTABLE. FOR ONE or THE FOLLOWING OR AN APPROVED
EOUAL
A. VULCATEX BY w.q. GRACE & CO.
DIVISION 8:
METAL DOORS & FRAMES-08110
1. PROVlOE DOORS ANO FRAMES COMPLYING WITH STEEL DOOR INSTITUTE "RECOMMENOED
SPECIFICATIONS FOit STANDARDS STEEL DOOR AND FRAMES" (SOl 100). AND AS HEREIN
SPECIFIED.
2. 5U8UIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF. HOLLOW METAL DOORS
AND FRAMES. INCLUDE DETAILS Of' tACH FRA.ME TYPE. ELEVATIONS OF DOOR DESIGN TYPES.
CONortJONS AT OPENINGS. DETAILS. OF CONSTRUCTION,
LOCATION AI~O INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS OF FINISH. HARDWARE AND REINFORCEMENT.
AND DETAILS OF JOINT CONNECTIONS. SHOW ANCHORAGE AND ACCESSORY ITE~S
3. WHERE FIRE-RATED DOOR ASSEMBLIES ARE JNDICATEO OR REQUiRED. PROVIDE FIRE-RATED
DOOR AND ;:RA~( ASSEMBLIES THAT COMPLY WITH NFPA 80 .STANDARD FOR FlRE DOORS AND
WINDOWS.. ,\.NO HA.....E BEEN TESTED. USTEO AND LABElED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 152
"STANDARD METHODS Of' FIRE TESTS or DOOR ASSEMBLIES'" BY A NATlONALLi RECOCNIZED
INDEPE!-IDENT TESTING AND INSPECTION AGENCY ACCEPTABLE TO AUTHORITIES HAVING
JURISOICTIOPt
4. HOT -ROLLE!) STEEL SHEETS AND STR1P: COMMERCiAl QUALITY CARBON STEEL. PICKLED AND
OILED. COMl'l Y!NG WITH Asn.. A 569 AND ASTM p. 568.
5 COLD-ROLL€D STEEL SHEETS: CQUMERC1AL QUALITY CARBON STEEl. CQMPL YING WITH
. ASTM A 366 AND ...STM A. 568.
6. SUPpORTS ,WO ANCHORS: fABRICATE OF NOT lESS THAN 16 GAGE SHEET STEEL..
7. INSERTS. BOLTS AND rASTENERS: MANUFACTURE'S STANDARD UNITS COMPLYING WITH
ASTM A 15,~. CLASS C OR D AS APPliCABLE.
8. . SHOP-APPPUED PAINT; FOR STEEL SURF'ACES USE RUST -INHIBITIVE ENAMEL OR PAINT.
EITHER AIR.-ORYING OR BAKING. SUITABLE AS A BASE FOR SPECIFIED FINISH PAINTS.
9, ~~~~TE ~~~~L~~ ':.p.:~, ~N~~<~~~~ ~:f;~;.,~E^T ~~ ~~~~~~~, ~N~NiT~E~:~~~
MANUf'ACTURER'S PLANT. WELD EXPOSED JOINTS . CONTINUOUSLY. GRIND AND MAKE S'-40QTH.
FLUSH AND INVISIBLE. METALUC FILLER TO CONCEAL MANur;ACTURING DEFECTS IS NOT
ACCEPTABLE.
10.CQUPLY win; SDI-ICO REQUIREMENTS AS F"OLlOWS: INTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE SDI-1oo.
GRADE II.. HEAVY DUTY. MODEL 1. 1.4INrfAOM 18 GAGE FACES.
11_EXPOSED r..1STENERS: UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. PROVIDE COUNTERSuNK FLAT
PHIli.IPS OR JACKSON HtAOS FOR ~xPOSED SCREWS AND BOLTS.
12 FINISH HAR;JWARE -'REPARATION: PREPARE HOLLOW METAL UNITS TO RECEIVE _ MORTISE ./I.ND
. CONCEAlE:D FINISH HARDWARE. INCLUDiNG CUTOUTS. REINFORCING. DRILLING AND TAPPING .
IN ACCORDJ\NCE 'NITH FINAl FINISH HARDwARE SCHEDULE AND TEMPlATES PROVIDED 9Y
HARDWARE SUPPLIER. COMPLY WITH "PPUCA8LE REOUIREMENTS or AN~I A 115
"SPECIFICAHONS FOR DOOR AND ~RAME PREPARATION.
13. PROVIDE STEEL REINFORCING AT HING2S IN HOLLOW METAL UNITS TO BE 7 GAGE
x 10 1/2Q x WIDTH REQUIRED.
14. PROVIDE HOLLOW METAL DOORS OF THE TYPES iNDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND
COMPLYING WITH SOI-100 MINIMUM MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS.
15. PROVIDE HOLLOW METAL fRAMES ;'JF ;~E tYPES AND STYlES INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS
AND COMPLYING WITH SOl 100. PRO'.'IDE 16 GAGE FRAMES AT INTERIOR LOCATIONS.
NOTE: DOOR SHALL BE OPERABLE FOR EXITING FROM THE INSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A
KEY OR ANY OTHER SPECIAL DEVICE.
FINAl DRA~
NOT RElEASED
FOR CONSIRUCT1ON
,
0.1. 1[; s/9/OD
ATL~CHMENT C
PAGE 2
~~~:~ :~::~~ FAX
/
/,~v....
kf.~f:':''':'L:'':'!' ::
'. l.Jn'/--)l!.,QD "AJ
:::-7:), ' "-'''~'' (jJ~ u ~
.... <.:......... _ .0'7.
",:,!.)~: ,t ~," \
"'~:r'
.oil DRAWINGS AND YrRfTl(N IAATERW.. CONTAINED
HER(IN ARE THE PROPERTY OF ENGINEER
1m ll4V NOT BE DtJPUCATED, uSED OR OISCLOSED
.NITHOUT THE .wRmEN CONS(HT Of' ENGiNEER.
0,,,,0,, SoL,,'o",
SOUTHEAST REGION
1015 AVIATION PARt<WAY
SUITE 700
MORRISVlllE, Ne 27560
Phone: (919) 469-9426
Fax: (919) 469-9967
I RlliASE I
100TE I
6/20/00 ISSUED FOR REVIEW
7/24/00 ISSUED FOR ZONING
I Rf.V1S1ONS I
I NO, DATE I
& 8/9/00 R(VISED PER CROWN
.6,
&
&
&,
THIS DRAWING IS coPYRIGHTED AND 1$ if-lf SOLE
PROPERTY Of' mE OWNER. IT IS PRODUCED
SOLElY mR lIS[ BY THE OWNER 'RO ITS UTltJ,I,TES.
REPftODUCTJON OR lJSE OF nilS DRAWING AoW/OR
THE iNF'ORUAnoN CONTAINED IN tT IS fO~81ODEN
WfTHOUT THE YtRmtN PERUlSS/ON OF THE OWNER.
DRAWH BY, CHS
CHECKED BY' BTM
I SITE ""'E I
YANCEY MILLS
1/2 MILE BRANCH ROAD
I SIT€. ~Ul.l8ER
CVR-348E
I SI~E 'DORESS
4521/2 MILE BRANCH ROAD
CROZET, VA 22932
I SI-l[E"'" rr;H
I
GENERAL NOTES &
SPECIFICATIONS
I S I-iEV NUMBER
C-1
I "i..::::; S":..ct
25
2E
~C'CAT[S SU,"'.;E"'::-:- F_.1SE PARCf::...
, "
PlANNERS ARCHITECTS ENGIf'jEERS SURVEYCRS
51\I
'1
-
...i;
~--
t
\,ijl~
..' ;1
;!
PAGE 3
~!,:..t>S:i:_~;".
':',f Rl)u~F ',-5.~
:.':~~:~,SE;:' :.-' '..
DAVID T, PASTORS
:.':( (.:. .~ ',: (;,( , J. F. ;'.;.. ~
".
'h:
(.,.:1......
ilHiTf
SITE #: CVR 348 "C'
SITE NAME: ~ MILE BRANCH
":,,!l.I[:.') 'J:-J
'):';:(J"~R1~
~.to-~' _~
')'"iC',
'J
--
I
.-L- --
\
\~
:'"
...~IPS
'~
-'-- LE.....SE AREA
~ S.62J SQ. 0.
..
gL'
o
/1</'1
_'l-,
-,l'PS
ATTACHMENT 4
_,C>
p;.pr::'I_
&
1'...L~~-
~l;';~'v,"i0.
q '1'l4\,.I{.~ -fJt;;....~
.,/Ii~NR ~. ..0'.
McAOE~r .' ~
No 002002 -.. ~::
,;;,!,,7-le-a? .-'
..fl."... .
DETAIL
SCALE: 1"=20'
--
---
--
--
S89'18'20"'N 125.00'
. !O" PiNE
....-;f8. 8LACK PINES
..'1 · 10" PI.".E
l:""8u..C~ PINE
59' TALL
w
'~
MAPLE' -
I 10" POPLAR
!. 7.3' TALL 18" MAPLE
92" rAlL
.
[1Z" SLACK PINE
, \ 60' TALL
PS,J..--.--l--- 625'2'...___
;4" POPLAR- .~4"
"
o
~
a" POPLAR
. 64' TALL
, 2:.._0D"
"lip
-.t
IX)
'D
W
I-
::>
o
a::
w
~
t-
ill
\
\
--
--
--
CENTER LEASE AREA ~--
N ~ 3905039,37 (U S. ;~ET)
E'= 11416551.55 (~J.S. FE'fT):
LAT .'-" J8'02'SO.86:!' .
LONG =:; 78'4.3'49.615"
ELEV .:; 7~_____
22" POPl...AR.
,)2' TALL
..
b
o
z
'J-
'"
;,i
~il
lO.
.
1;)' ;':!OPlAR
", .JO" "!NE ·
"';2' fA.LL
14'~r.I~O~A.R .
87' TALL .
14" MAPLE
72' "ALL.
'0
o
~
,;p.:?'
IPS
.NDiCAfES LINES 7;..t.to.T "'PE ~ROM RECORDS
~\i[ ....OT SliR\(YC:' .'.:;' iHE GRGu~~D
\
\
IPF
P.O.B, #1
11>5
----
----
o
----
----
~ S8J'5}';n'"
.-.." ~ c:. '501.59"
~----
----
NOTES
,. OWNEi< OF RECORO DAVIO T. PASTORS
2. LEGAL REFERENCE: DEED BOOK 1146 PAGE 511
3, TAX MAP NUM8ER, 55-93
4. PROPERTY IS lONED: RA
5. VERTiCAl OATUM IS NAVO-88.
6. BEARINGS ARE REfERENCED TO .....IRGINIA STATE GRID
7 COOROINATES 8ASED ON VIRGINIA STATE GRIO, SOUTH ZON,~,
8. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORO WHICH WERE PROVIDEO TO
SuRVEYOR ARE SHOWN HEREON, NO TITLE REPORT WAS
FURNISHED TO SURVEYOR .'ND THERE MAY 8E
ENCL:MBRANCES ON SURVEYED PROPERTY NOT SHOWN '-H:":REON.
9. LOCAi.. POWER COMPANY: VEPCO PHONE 540-289-7:j49
10. LOCAL 'ELEPHONE COMPANY: SPRINT PHONE 540-22,-8101
11, CALL ~lISS UTILITY AT 1-800-552-7001 BEFORE COMMENCiNG
C0!'>lSTRUCTrON
12. PROPt:PTY !S lOCAED IN F.LM.A. FLOOD ZONE "C AS PfR
FLee.) MAP WITH ~ COMMUNlf'r--?ANEL NUMBER OF S:00Q6 O~90 e
wITt< -\N EFFECTIvE DArE OF DECEMBER 16. i 980.
BEGINNING (P.O.8. 11) AT AN IRON PIN FOUND AT THE NORTHWEST PROPERTY CORNER OF
NOW OR FORMERLY RONALD E &: PATRICIA R. LAYNE, OEm 800K 1077, PAGE 665, SAID
POINT ALSO LOCATEO ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF NOW OR FORMERLY DAVID r. PASTORS OEEO
BOOK 1672. PAGE 537, TAX# 55-19D; THENCE LEAVING SAID LAYNE AND WITH THE LINES OF
SAID PASTORS PROPERW N3Z.34....9"W 710,84 FEET TO AN IRON PIN FOUNO; THE.NC:::'
S60'49'1'''W 499,62 FEET TO A POINT BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NOW OR FOIlMERLY
DAVID c. &: ELLEN C. KING, DEED 800K 1562. PAGE 581; THENCE lEAVING SAIO PASTORS
PROPCRT" AND WITH THE EASTERN liNE OF SAIO KING NI6'50'16'W 503.25 FEET TO A POINr
8EING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Of NOW OR FORMERLY OAVIO r. PASTORS, OEED 800K 1264-
PAGE 397, TAXI 55-93A; THENCE LEAVING SAlO KING ANO WITH THE SOUTHERN liNES OF
SAID PASTORS PROPERTY S83'52'10"E 1601.59 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N66'45'16"E
159,1.3' TO A POINT: THENCE S76'24'45"E 125.07 FEET TO A POINT 8EING THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF NOW OR FORMERLY OAVID '- PASTORS, DEEO 800K 1489, PAGE 161: THENCE
WITH THE liNES OF SAIO PASTORS PRCPERTY S05'56'15"E 301.69 FEET TO A POINT: THENCI'
N80'36'45"E 147,46 FEET TO A POINT: THENCE N79'37'56"E 317,83 FEET TO A POINT BEIN~
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PASTCRS PROPERTY. SAIO POINT ALSO LOCATEO ON lHE
WESTERN RIGHT Of WAY OF STATE ROUTE 684: THENCE LEAVING SAIO PASTORS PROPERTi
AND WITH THE RleHT OF WAY or STATE ROUTE 684S14"19'47"E 201.51 TO A PIPE Fe-UNO
AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NOW OR FORMERLY EARL M. & GENOVA M. DURRETT. OEEO
800K 494, PAGE 231: THENCE LEAVING STATE ROUTE 684 ANO WITH THE NORTH liNE OF
SAIO DURRm S74'59'12"W 200,90 FEET TO A POINT 8EING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAiO
DURREfT, :;AIO POINT'LSO 8EING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAlO RONALO E. &: PATRICIA R.
LAYNE; THENCE LEAVING SAID DURRm ANO WITH THE NORTHERN liNE OF SAID LAYNE
S74'57'4'''W 335.47 FEET TO A POINT BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NOW OR FORMERLY
DAVIO T. PASTORS, OEEO 800K 1661, PAGE 303, TAXI 55-9381: THENCE LEAVING
SAIO LAYNE AND WITH THE liNES OF SAID PASTORS N34'24'4Z''W 217.72 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE S82'58'44"W 287.83 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SlI'30'13"E 259.09 FEET TO A POINT
8EING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PASTORS, SAIO POINT ALSO 8EING A CORNER OF
SAiD lAlNE; THENCE LEAVING SAID PASTORS AND WITH THE liNE OF SAID LAYNE saO'2':34""
553.20 'EET TO THE POINT OF 8EGINNING, CONTAINING 23.001 ACRES OF LANO FROM RECORD
AND BEING SITUATED IN WHITE IiALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. AL8EMARLE COUNTY. VIRGINLo,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION P,ARENT TRACT
l' <451'
i~U'
(~; C (] I e
30e'
-- ()
.-~
-
200
100
r..ASEMEN":'
_:NE fA8LE
rruM8E~~cncN~-TC7~~S
~L1 i:H4'JJ'501''W :62.75'.!
W:.L. i ~.;2'34'49"','" 11':6.43' I
U:.~~'24'16"E 186.78' J
I ~: j~:~:.~~:~~::~ l:~'~~: I
; ~~ 1~2;';;'21<V !~;9.05'~
~ ;~,4'21'20"::: 14~
La 'S67'54'OC"E 2'054';
L9 577'12'56"[ 1'5-5,93"
UO ~81'44'3J"E '20llirl
L 11 !'t82'c:.O'2S"=-
[U2 S2!'~2'32"E
~WJP0SEa
.1.C::ESS\:.:T,:....iT....
~
<,:~~i
~?t(i~.
23,001 ACRES
F~0M RECORDS
D,B, 1146, PG, 511
TAX# 55-93
----
----
----
----
----
----
------
----
/
/"
f------____
\
~\
"'\
~~:
'..ll
~\
.~
;;\
\
J.-~
(
----
P, "ROPe';[" 20' ---- _ ,S ,
..-'\' '.CC['>/~ITlLiTY ____ ____ .". ,,". .~~<.'
~ \ ~'S""'~"'''.. . ____ ~6'A' ~ :-, 1'<5""
~7 [WAfER ,--:M"', ~ .c:).O;.o.... .
-~:~':::~ -1 :~.; \ \ \, _...
\ \~ ',::C:::.:< 'I PC"':' UTllI;Y POLl ""...
.,~'~ "'~"::'~:, '" OMF 31 I'
'" \ -""':"<:-' ". 80Rf _ _ 2i ~
\ -' \ '>~ (HOLE 8v'c _
" ...........~ ,q rC'P~ ,;0.E, g ~
\ '\1 \ ~:::'::.::-...-...~t'J - .Jj;!.~ I'w , '" I
Ii ~~, ~\ _ '" 'j
'I' - ----==, ___, ~,'\ ,_
t.~ ':1\)\ S ----- --, ,\, l,g
':>. . \ 680 - - ,,- ~ _ - \ in
C;. j' " "15.1 / " ,\ \ ':. 5i N8C'36'4~
:;'../ :,...- ':-" I, '.)ATe;; \ \,~ Ng2'S'l28 '( ,T,E "Eo' q746 . " ,,' j ]
;.~ '., ". / EXISTlNC-- ~lO , -! \\\ 14cJl~ ~\ ' _~:.9~Z-~5J_>-.:._~----- L ~
#\. A8ANDONED, \ .J ) ___.__ _ ___ _ _ ~'.j .~
J / "7.:1l;' V\.J.-.--____,-___ --7-- _ _, ----"":..... ''''~_
-;.. ". HOUSE ..' y~ ~ --J.:l.O 0 _ -=---F'"' _ ,,="- "_-==- ' _ _ ,
"~\ <~~/ ' cREEK' 'r:;. 644'W Z8~-83-TOTi0::~~-~'t_"\~,.:---:.-:..::-- --:.,-:::;;---- \UETlU~ ,")/ =- ':2.\;
\\./ ' IS,S2.." ~. " '~E~'; -- N 4, ':C. ~.
\ " \ uTiLITY OOLE) \';:,~ \F'\ISTlNG 30' . '.XlSTiNG .le". ~
\ \ ~ ". '. -~~ \:-.~ "E56 \ ~ ACCESS EASWEI" AcCESS' EASEMENT ,;
\ V' \ IPS . _ i ~['~TE~~~~~ ;;rrUS rEm !:=;. ---!
:..\ ~,' :' ~ 11416551.55 IJ,S, FE[1'); ", Y _ , '
..~-----.-l~;~G~ =j8~~?~~~4~~il"5~ ~ \; ::,~. _ -:::- ----r;;:." ,,'w 2009"
~_:..2~e FEeT ,-----' 0 L- ~"A''''I, o3~.' \ 0 ..
_ _ --:- _ _ ~"' ____ ____ _/ J
-80.24.34........ 55J.20 i
. ~--
\
\
'.
" \\
......... '\
.....,~\
.,
\'" \
, \
" \
\ "".\
\ '
0~,...'
\~\~"
\'"
~\~r'O'B' 13
~ .. "
1c>" \ 20.5'
<,..\!l,B}~ /
0'1-
\ \'"% "
\~\(j:O."
r"'\t...:l..
\"'\J'
'\~
~.
,i-
P,Q.8, #1 \
/
/'"
COMMENCING AT AN 'RON PIN FOUND (P.0.8. II) 8EiNG THE SOUTHWESTERN MOST PROPERTY
CORNER OF NOW OR FORMERLY DAVIO r. PASTORS. OEED 800K 1146 PAGE 511,
N'9'02'52"W 52.14 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET AT THE TRUE POINT OF 8EGINNING(P08 IZ):
THENCE WITH THE NEW LINES OF THE LEASE PARCEL AND CONTINUING THROUGH THE
L'.NDS OF SAID DAVIO T. PASTORS NOG' 41' 40"W 125,00 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET: THENCE
N89'18'20"E 125,00 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET; THENCE SOO'41'4O"E 125.00 FEET TO AN
iRON PIN SET: THENCE S89'18'20"W 125.00 FEET TO THE 8EGINNING CONTAINING 15,625
SQUARE FEET OF LAND AND 8EING SITUATED IN WHITE ~ACL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, ALBEMARLE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA.
!..:EGAL JESCRIPTION LEASE PARCEL
:..EGAL :;f.SCRIPTtON OF 20' ACCESS\UTH.llY EASEMENT
COMMENCING AT AN IRON PIN SET (P O.B_ H2) ,\, lHE SOUfHWESTERN MOST CORNER OF
THE PROPOSEO LEASE PARCEL THENCE NOO'41'40"W ZO,50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING (PO.8, '3);
'HENCE THROUGH THE LANDS Of OAVlD r. PASTORS, OEEO BOOK 1146, PAGE 511, TAXI
05-3.'. ".0 CONTINUING WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE PROPOSEO 20' ACCESS\UTlLllY
fASEMPjT N44'3J'S4"W 62.75 FEET TO A POINT: THENCE N32'34'4Q"''''' 136.4) FEET TO A
oOINT; -"ENCE N55'24'16'E 86.78 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NI8'38'30"[ 94.08 FEET TO
A >>OINT: THENCE fH6'OS'.38"W 62.83 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N20'12"21"W 139.05 FEET
TO A POINT: THENCE N74'ZI'20"( 49.60 FEET TO A POINT, THENOE S67'54'00"E 210.54
rEET '0 A POINT; THENCE S7712'56"E 155.93 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N81'44'33"E
205,45 rEET TO A POINT; THENCE N82'50'25"E 79.36 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE
52"'2'32"[ 144,67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE OF NOW OR
'ORMERLY OAVID T. PASTORS, DEEO 800K 1661, PAGE 303, TAXI 55-93Bl, SAlO POINT
ALSO 8EING THE ENO OF THE PROPOSEO 20' ACCESS/UTIliTY EASEMENT AND THE
Il!:GINNING OF AN EXISTING 30' ACCESS EASEMENT; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE
CENTERliNE OF THE EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT ANO WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
P-'STORS PROPERTY N82'S8' 44 "E 1 50_00 FEET TO A POINT BEING THE NORTHEASTERN
CORNER OF SAID PASTORS PROPERTY; THENCE LEAVING SAl0 PASTORS PROPERTY
N82'58'28-E 148.31 FEET TO A POINT 8EING THE SOUTHWESTERN PROPERTY CORNER OF
NOW OR FORMERLY DAVIO T. PASTORS, DEED 800K 1489, PAGE '61, TAX' 55-938;
THENCE WITH THE SOllTHERN LINES OF SAID PASTORS PROPERTY N80'36'45"E 147,46 FEET
,0 A POINT; THENCE N79'37'56"E 317.83 FEET TO A POIN; CN THE "ESTERN RIGHT OF
'NM or STATE ROUTE 684; BEING THE END OF THE ACCESS/UTILITY EASEMENT, HAVINC A
!"OiAL ~ENGTH OF 2. t91.07 FEET.
(
'(
(
c
c
,
z:
~
~
"
,
"
"
,/
~
'i
~
'"
~
~
v
,
w
"
"
I
"
'"
o
f
~
~
/
,/
,/
/
(--
\
---
NIF
DAVID L, 8< ELLEN C. KING
0.8. , 562, PC. 58'
TAXI 55-21
ZONED RA
LAND USE: VACANT
\
23.001 ACRES
FROM RECORDS
D,B. 1146, PG. 511
TAXi 55-93
ZONED: RA
LAND USE: VACANT
\
\
\
/
/
./
/
---
/
./
./
NIF
DAVlO T. PASTORS
D.S. 1672, PG, 537
TAXI 55-190
ZONEO RA
LAND USE: VACANT
00015'2.-
NIF
DAVlD T PASTORS
0,8. 1264, PG, 397
TAXI 55-93A
ZONED RA
LAND USE: VACANT
--
....,PF
\
\'~~
LINE
\
\
EXISTING FENCE
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF END OF EXISTING
ROAD
CENTER Of PROPOSED 99'
WOOD=====---
PROPOSED TREE UNE
PROPOSED 12' WIDE
GRAVEL DRIVE
MIN, SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
FRONT: 75'
SIDES: 25'
REAR: 35'
~
1, RA: RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL
2, VR: VilLAGE/RESIDENTIAL
NOTE:
NO SIGNIfiCANT VEGETATION
WILL BE REMOVED
I
/
/
/
/
?
~!
..~~~.~
NIF
OAVID T. PASTORS
\ D.BTA~*8~'s~g3B'61
ZONED RA
LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL ___
~TELE' PED. _---~-
\ J-- - - - -- -_-~:":~~IL:ij POLE
--~ \.-==~~- [' ~- - - - :U:L1TY POLE \-. ~C~~'~~"'~S~~ENT
- - - I ME 96 __
UTILITY POLE..J EXISTING 30' _________,
ME56 ACCESS EASEMENT __ \
\
------------
E<lSITNG ROAO TO BE
U'GRAOED TO CROWN
CASTLE STANDAROS
~gT~~EES TO BE REMOVEC
Q
\
'.
w
~
~-
EXISITNG GRAVEL
ROAD ENOS
/'
~
./
\
I
IBORE
,
\ UTlUTY POLE
'D MF 3'
POND
-----..j
\
I
5
8
E
...
'"
~
'"
~
~'.~'/
EXISTING TREE LINE -/ / Df
EXISTING
ABANDONED
HQU:;E
PROPOSED CROWN CAS~LE
COMMUNlCAll0NS '25',,25'
LEASE AREA
99' fAlL It'OIUS
,Q\JIPloIttll
,,~ 10 ;:.:--
49\.J \
NIF
DAVID T. PASTORS
D,S. '661, PG. 303
TAXi 55-93B 1
ZONED RA
LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL
,/./
./
\
/'
-----
~
/
PROPOSED TRITON PCS
10',20' LEASE AREA
(200 S.F.)
74.74'f TC EaUIPYENT
,
,
\\
NIF
ROANLD E. de PATRICIA R. LAYNE
D.B. 1077, PG. 665
TAX' 55A-45
ZONEO VR
lAND USL VACANT
SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1" lOa'
100 0 _~_..!.90
1"~100' -----
,
\
EARL
PIPE
\NO
\
NIF
M. & GENOVA M. DURRm
0.8, 494, PC, 231
TAX' 55A-45A
20NED RA
LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL
'!\
>:.
f'\
g
So
'"
t
\
\
F1NAl DRAft<<;
NOT REUASED
FOR CONSTRIJCT1ON
~...':! 8/9/00
ATTACHMENT
PAGE 4
~H:~ :~~:~~ FAX
,.<';J:ii,:;fN"""
-1''''.,:'' ,;-\-'1'1'\.,
~:t~ ".,
4,0(/00"". ", O.
Ii..,'."" . -" ~
. Nc. o;:;.:.s~;; ~ :>
~.'l) fl),~
;'::t.,Ss/OW:L ",$- I
~
All OAAWlNGS AND WRITTt~ w.TERW.. CC
I4EREIN ARE THE PRCpr~T)' o~ EN
AND ~y NOT BE OUPLK).TEC, ,'SED O~ Di
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT J~ ~
.f'd.wireless Solu
SOUTHEAST REG lor
1015 AVIATlON PA.RKWAY
SUITE 700
MORRISVllLE. NC 27560
Phone: (919) 4W-~26
Fax: (919) 469-9967
REtEASE
OAT[
6/20/00 ISSUED FOR RE'YI[W
7/24/00 ISSUED FOR ZONING
REVISIONS
NO, OAT[
.& 8/9/00 RE\~SEC PER CROWf,
&.
&,
&
&.
THIS DRA..INC IS COPY'RIGn"!!J >\NO ;s n
PROPERtY OF rH[ OWNER. iT IS PR(
SOllY FUR USE BY THE amu AN{) rrs Af
REPROOVCTJON OR tis( OF n.rs DRA'MHG
THE iNFORUATION CONTAlNm ,N rr is m
WITHOUT mE WRf!lfN P[Rl.'JSS~ CF !'HE
DRAWN BY; C:-oS
CHECKEQ 6Y' 87M
I SITE ~AME
YANCEY MIL
1/2 MILE BRANCH R
::::
I SITE NUMBER
CVR-348E
I SITE ADDRESS
::::
452 1/2 MILE BRANCH F
CORZET, VA 22932
SHEET TITLE
SITE PLAN
I SHEO NUMB[i~
C-3
~~-
27
(
(:
f"Y'\(\("\{\fV\(\
~
~
w
o
o
..-
~
"
z
~
i
ro
.
~
,
~
o
o
i
~
i
~
;'>
~
NOTE:
NO SIGNIFICANT
VEGETATION TO
BE REMOVED
R-IO'
\J.JUv
0"
0:0
':0
~':"
(')C~
Gl~ '"
",go
~~~
","'~
.:'" z
"'00
~;/;;
g~
.
~
a" POPl..AR
64' TALL
10" POPLAR W
10" POPLAR
73' TALL
w
''" PINE
10" PINE
72' TALL
..
18" MAPLE
9Z' TALL
W
..
1 2 ~ POPLAR
87" TALL
w
"
:0
",0
~~
~i'l
....0
0-
:0"',
~~
g
.. 10" PINE
57' 6"
14- MAPLE
7Z' TALL
w
lZ" BLACK PINE
.. 60' TALL
TRITON PCS
WAVE GUIDE
BRIDGE
PROPOSED TRITON PCS
10'x20' LEASE AREA
(ZOO S,f.)
1 ." POPLAR
PROPOSED
EQUIPMENT
CABINET
ZO'
~
PROPOSED 10'x12'
CONCRETE EQUIPMENT
PAD
.. 10" PINE
S" BLACK PINES
..
8" BLACK PINES
.. S" BLACK PINES
..
10' BLACK PINE
59' TALL
22" POFLAR
92' TALL
1_ ~~~ "ff
PROTECTION fENCE
(lYPICAL) w
\87
PROPOSED TRITON PCS
H~fRAIIE METER STAND
(\(\~~
~ PROPOSED TREEUNE
I ___.
: ~. COMMUNICATIONS 125'x125
~ . L~E AREA
o
,:J
'.
'!:
,X'"
PROPOSED TEt.lPORARY TREE
PROTECTION fENCE
(TYPICAL) W
\87
SITE DETAIL PLAN
SCALE: 1" 5'
5 0
'"-5'~
n..'w
! .1
W, j
ii]f'<J<)'08'2.'
<\ ~ ~
~ C
~l S;
n\ "',g
~\~ "
\
\
\
\
14" MAPLE
~
SECTOR 1
ANTENNA
~UCTf!Nr18; SO'
CLUSTER MOUNT (lYP.)
_ A r MOUNTED fLUSH TO POLE
SEC"OR J ~
ANTENNA 60'
~hY'b~NTlR SO'
SECTOR Z
ANTENNA
AZIMUTH 1ZO' ,
RAO CENTER 80
~. E FROM TRUE NORTH,
1, AZIMUTHS ARE ORIENTATED CLOC:O~in ANTENNA RAO CENTER
2. CONTRACTOR SHAll VERIFYR Jo~O PCS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION
ANO ORIENTATIONS WITH T I
OF ANTENms.
rnw. DRAWING
NOT REI.EA.'lED
FOR CONSlll\JCT1ON
').1. T'[ 8/0/00
A TT ACHMENT
PAGE 5
H~:~ :~~:2200 ~~
V""
. (lvYx'
.-< -:\
~~. vr-
" ,,' - (
\\, "':";'
',' ~~"".::(,'.';.(:.
.t~~
AU. D~~ ~~~ wp~~E~~L ~;:
~R~~ "fOT BE OUPfX.\TlD. :;$EO O~ _~
WITHOUT WE wRIITfN C:)NSENT .~~ t. "it
nWireless Solul
SOUTHEAST REG,m
1015 AVIATION PARKWAY
SUITE 700
MORRISVlllE. NC 21560
Pt>one; \919} 469-9426
FaK: (919) 46g..9967
RElfAS!:
OAT[
6/20/00
7/2'/00
'SSUEO rOR ~E.V1EW
ISSUED FOR ZONING
REVS:E~ ~TR :,~'O~N
THIS O,~WING ,5 COPYR!CHTfO ~o <: s=>~~
PROPyE'i~ :;r -:;l :iV~~ ~ -"0 )[
~UCT:ON Oq uSE or i..rs 0;1."%
THE :'6CRt.lAl1CN CONTAlN[O :... ",) ""E
.,../THOlfT roi[ NRm[N P(RUlSSiOH ~
DRAWN a..,..
CHECKED 3'(:
eriS
9H.l
I Sill 'iAWE
YANCEY MIL
1/2 MILE BRANCH RI
=
I SITE 'iUl,ISER
CVR-348E
I SITE "'OOR~s.s
=:
452 1/2 MILE BRANCH R
CROZET, VA 22932
SHEt, rn::
SITE DETAIL PLAN
~E~
C-4
I P',C' ',"-.
28
(
~
~
i
~
!
~
i
o
\';
<>
~
o
o
~
i3
~
~
~
(
N
"
'-
I
<:J
(;;
I
w
w
'"
'-
i / i
7
W
..J
n.
~
0&
...
l<<lIE;
LIGHTNING ROD --......
"'........
3 SECTOR TRITON PCS
CLUSTER MOUNT ANTENNAS
(FLUSH MOUNT) PAINTED
BROWN (EARTH TONE) ~
N
<J)
':;:
i3
~
w
w
eo
",I
~I
&\
~I
I
i'
(
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
\ TRITON PCS CABINET
\ PAINTED BROWN (EARTH
TONE)
1. IF THE COMPOUNO IS CLCS, '0 A ROAD WHERE THERE IS A POSSIBILITY
THAT ANY EOUIPMENT CAN 5~ SEEN, ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING IS REOUIRED
ANO THE CONCRETE PAD -.'v$, BE TINTEQ (NOT PAINTEQ) BROWN.
~ ELEVATION VIEW LOOKING NORTH
.;;
7
0:
::5
"-
o
"-
..
o
(
i
'"
u,
ill
~I'
~
~I
I
I
i
I
i
I
I
w
-'
"-
<(
::;
..
:.,
:--...
-------- FOUNDATION (OESIGN BY OTHERS)
N
<J)
'-
I
<:J
W
I
W
w
a::
'-
/
/
~
I
(
i
I
I
I
I
[
--r
nl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
I 101
101' 81
I ~ ~
~I ~ ~I
~ I 8 \@
~! I ~
If)' 0::: -r
'0 ~ ~ g
I W
'" U
'S. 0
<(
'"
o
w
V1
'0
"-
o
0::
Q.
_J...-LJ._
.
. ~I'
t VIEW
.
PLc\N NOTE'
CD HEIGHT Of PROPOSED WOOD MONOPOLE
SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 7' ABOVE
TALLEST TREE WITHIN A 25' RADIUS OF
THE CENTERLINE Of THE PROPOSED
WOOD MONOPOLE,
<:!
z
<5
::J
V1
U
"-
Z
o
'-
a::
'-
~I
,-'
Qi
'ii
",I
~:
21
gl
bl
F1HAl DRA.NC
NOT REJ..EASEI)
FOR COHSlRUCll
DATE' 8/9/00
t
ATTACHMENT
PAGE 6
(724) "6-2200 FAX
"..k"~"~"" ..
,:," .; r.'~ . - -w
ki;<..., u<:;'
~" ".",. it
. ,'. " ,:'J~"',~ \{/
.~c,..,~4.;. ;:;j /.
-..~~.j-..
AU DRAWINGS A"lO WRmEs W.TER\Al COt
HEREIN ARE T"-lE ='ROP~R'Y OF EN(
AHO MAY 'WT 8E CuPUCATUl. JSED OR CIS
WITHOuT '1-iE wRITTEN CONSENT OF EN(
n
o2wireless SoluI
SOUTHEAST REGIO"
1015 AVIATION PARKWAY
SUITE 700
MORRISVILLE. NC 27560
Phone: (919) 469-9426
Fax: (919) 469-9967
RELEASE
VATE
6/20/00 ISSUED fOR REVlEW
7/24./00 ISSUED fOR ZONINC
RE\'1SiONS
NO. !Y.TE
& 8,9/00 REVISED oER CROWN
.&.
.&
&.
&
rnlS ORAWlN<; ~S COP'fflIGHTEO <\NO IS 11-1I
PROPERTY OF THE OWNER. IT IS PRO
SOliD "OR USE aY THE C~(R .&,NO ITS .\fl
REPROOUCTION OR uSE OF iHI$ DRAWING !
WE NFCRMATlON CONTAINED .N n :S FOIl
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSiON OF HiE
~RA,.YN av CHS
C"EeKED BY' 8TM
I$lTE'Ii,!J,lf
YANCEY MIL
1/2 MILE BRANCH Rl
I SiTE 'vuSER
-:
CVR-348E
I SITE .wORESS
=
452 1/2 MILE BRANCH R
CROZET, VA 22932
SHErr -1'fL~
SITE ELEVATIONS
I Si-iE~. ~UIA8E~
C-s
1
E 3C'\'_~'-=~
25
J
E 'SCALE- - _
C-6
[ SHEET NUI,lBER
GRADING PLAN
SHES'TrTL
452 1/2 MILE BRANCH R
eROZET, VA 22932
[ SITE .\.ODRESS
CVR-348E
[ SITE "lllUBER
YANCEY MIL
1/2 MILE BRANCH RC
(S1TE~t.tE
;R'WN 8Y, ens
.:"ECKED BY' 8TM
THIS :JAAWIHG 1$ COPYRIGHTED mD 'S THI
PROPERTY OF THE OWNER IT is P/ill
SOI.E!.Y F"QR USE: 9Y mE ovmrR ,\NO ITS m
REPRCOUCnON OR USE or THiS DRAWING ;
THE '''FORMATION CONUJNEO ~~ iT'S .OR
WfTHOiIT THE WRlffiN PrnI.lISSION CF ':HE
RE'ilSIONS
NO. OATE
&. 8i9/00 I REVISEO PER C.'IDWN
&.
&,
&
&,
RElEASE
O.f(
6/20/00 ISSUED FOR REVIEW
7/24/00 ISSUED fOR ZONING
SOUTHEAST REGION
1015 AVIATION PARKWAY
SUITE 700
MORRISVIUE. NC 27560
Ptlone; 1919) 469-9426
Fax: (919) 469-9967
~Wireless Solut
AlL OAA"NGS AND WRITTE/i IM.T[RIlL CON
HEREIN ARE '!liE PROPERTY OF' ENG
AND "'" NOr BE OVPlJCAlUJ, USED Oil OIS<
WITHOUT Tl-IE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ENG
if\.
';<~,;"C:<:: ,.;)
"....,;, , ...,g'-
-;((~~.:.(f;~'
1
f,V
':v
~;~:~ :::=~m FAX
PAGE 7
ATTACHMENT
F1NAL DRAntG
NOT RELEASED
FOR COHSTRUC11OH'
O"'TE: 1/24/00
10 0 10
,"=10' ~_~--_.-.-
30 0 30
1"=30' ~____~l
SCALE: 1"~10'
SCALE: '''~30'
GRADING PLAN DETAIL
GRADING PLAN
NOTE:
I. THE SLOPE WITHIN LEASE AREA is lESS THM4 25%
-PROPE'R1'I LINE
----
PROPOSED TRITON PCS
, O'x20' LEASE AREA
(200 S.F.)
'Ill 8" BL'CK PI'''
.. 8" BlACK PINE .., " D'N
.. .. 8~ 8L..\CK DINE 0 E
CENTER Of PROPOSEO 99'
WOOOEN MONOPOLE
lOR.. SLACK PINE
)9' TALL
v
.'0" P!NE
PROPOSED TEMPORARY TREE ~
PROTECTION FENCE
(TYPiCAl) r6\
'0J \), ,~.
*
14" MAPLE
*
: d." POPLAR
fA\
I
12" BLACK PINE
.. 60' T'Ll
*
14" MAPLE
72' TALL
~
; B" MAPLE
92' fALL
~
10" PINE
'0" PINE 72' T>LL..
..
, 2" POPlAR
87' TALL
~
'0" POPlAR
*
10" POPLAR
73' TALL
8" POPlAR
64' TALL
~
..
\
--
----' -.--C
~~~~~?
ACCESS EASEM'ENT
::;/
5;
/~
""",,/
ABANDONED
HOUSE
EXISTING /
TREE LINE
-------
\
\
\
\
/
I
I
ENO OF
EXISTING
GRAVEL DRIVE
\
I
\
/
!
/
/
/ ~
C,C,P. ________ -
. -------I -
-1---
~~ '
\
'"
n\
,.~"\ ~:\f~W08''''
~ ~ ~
';l EI~
o ~ \l
5~~
\ ~ 6:
\ II
\. \~~
u> '
\ i
WATER LINE ""
\
\
\
\
POND
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
UTILITY POLE (~
MF 31
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
, '~'01 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
\. ", ....-l ' .~ I
/~\ "" : :
// \ L___n____n______.-J
/
\
"
\
\ ----
;PF \- -
--1- ----
.
.
.
.
.
L PROPOSED CROWN CASTLE
COMMUNICATIONS 125'x125'
LEASE AREA
r----~----- --------~
I I
I I
\
\
\
\
\
I-
I
I
I
\
\
\
\'
\
\
~
\
\
\
~ PROPOSED CROWN CASTLE
COMMUNICATIONS 2D' WIDE
ACCESS EASEMENT,
/~-
/-~-
PROPOSEO 12' WIDE
GRAVEL DRIVE
"
1"')'
(
~
(
..
o
o
o
E
i
~
,.
"
p
--
~
"
z
~
o
..
i
oc
(-
~
~
~
~
0
( 0
0
z
"
g
~
~
u
=
0
~
~
~
~
!
~
(-
~1.; .
SA-BINET
~
D/
I',. CHAMFER-.
1045'(TYP.) \
;; CONCRETE PAD
. WWF6l'..... -N2.9",2.90M1D DEPTH
I r '," ,,~""'-
,'/2" SLOPE
,-
3" CL
12'-0"
\- SUBGRAOE
(6) '4'S
CONT.
3" ClEAR
(TYP,)
'4 STIRRUPS 0
18" CIC TYP,
EQUIPMENT SUPPORT PAD CROSS SECTION
10'-0"
@
.t-
i------------l
I
I
I
I
I
'"
"
"\
,
____________...-J
I
J
1:ll2ItS;
1. ;C' :; 3000 ?S:, Fy == 60 KSI
"') ;OCT!NG TO EXTE~;D ;. MINIMUM OF 12" BELOW UNDISTURBED SOIL AND
~-~OST LINE.
3, <,~"'- SITE OESIGN 'S THE RESPDNSIBIUTY OF THE SITE CONTRACTOR
.;. S~8 FOUNDAT!ON C>ESIGNEO. ASSUMING AlLOWABLE SOIL BEARING
PR~SSURE OF 2000 PSF.
5 SL.:..a FOUNDATION DESIGNEO ASSUMING MAXIMUM PLASTICITy" INDEX OF 27
6. Tot... CONCRETE: EA.:rn-4TONE
CONCRETE EQUIPMENT SUPPORT PAD PLAN
~ I
~a.
WAVE GUIDE BRIDGE ~
POSTS (TYP.) r--.,
,
I
. I
: : /- ":E 8RIDGE
I Y
I ,
r.:1\ "
TRITON PCS C:AB!NET W
PAINTED BROWN (EARTHTONE) I I
I I
I I
I I
EOGE OF '\
CONCRETE \
/~?~auIP~~::::: J
'f0~~~.~;; ! I
5'-0' I
24" I
I
:,1
'~l- !
~ I
, I
0:
o
I
;.,
.._____- 3-1/2" DIA, METAL POSTS EMBEDDED
____, IN CONCRETE INSTALLED PER
. MANUFACiURER'S INSTRUCT10NS
4" OF i/57
STONE
9
N
(-~~_.~' ,/--';- :-:-::'....:;--i.:.~ .-: _'
4 ~ll~f~lrf~m~;;"~
:III=~II!-=!"-'"
I.-I.
I
i
01
';'1
I
I
,
llilJL
1. PIPE (,OLUMNS, WAVEGUIDE CHANNEL.
AND PIPE HEAD AS MANUFACTURED BY
.4-OVANCED LIGHTNING TECHNOLOGY.
2. CONNECT EACH SUPPORT LEG TO
GROUND RING
3, CABLE SUPPORT SPACING EVERY 3' -0"
4. COORDINATE CABLE ROUTE AND
INSTALLATION WITH CABINET.
10'-0"
~
---i
~
2 WAVE GUIDE BRIDGE DETAIL
3
CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD LAYOUT
'NOOOEN MONOPOLE
@
.
-40
,OAPA TR-5
/ MECHANICAL OOWNTILT BRACKET
I
OAPA TR-5
MECHANICAL DOWNTIL T BRACKET
AND DAPA FIX 805
PIPE MOUNT 8RACKET
\
\
MICROFLECT PIPE MOUNT ~
PART iI 81882 OR EuUAL
PANEL ANTENNA
\
"- MICROFLECT TRI-BRACKET
PART iI 81828 OR [QUAL
PANEL ANTENNA ---\
\
\
"
1~
I.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SIZE OF TRI-BRACKET
FEOUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
2, PANEL ANTENNAS TO 8E FLUSH MOUNTED
TQ wOOD MONOPOLE
3. pNTENNA DIMENSIONS HxWxD "'" 44.7x6,3"x2.7"
MICROFLECT PIPE MOUNT j
DART # 81882 OR EOUAl
\-. MICROFLECT TRI-BRACKET
PART , 81828 OR [QUAL
TRI-BRACKET MOUNT DETAIL
r FENCE POSTS MAY BE 4."0 P:NE
OR 2"0 OAK
,.
ORANGE UV-RESISTANT HIGH TENSILE
STRENGTH POLY 8ARRICADE f:'ABRIC
~
PROTECTlON OF EXISTING VEGETATION:
AT THE S1ART OF GRADING INVOL'/ING THE
LOWERING Of EXISTING GRADEAROU"'JO A TREE
OR STRIPPING OF TOPSOIL, A CLEAN, SHARP,
VERTICAL CUT SHALL BE MAOE AT ;~E EDGE OF
Tl-iE 'l'REE SAVE AREA AT THE SAME fl'wtE AS OTt-4E:~
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE. INSTALLED.
lNSTA~LED ON ~HE SIDE OF THE CUT ~ARTHESl
AWAY FROM fHE TREE TRUNK AND SHAll REMAIN
IN PLACE UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION oN THE VICINITY
OF fHE TREES IS COMPLETE. NO STORAGE OF
MATERIALS. FilL. OR EOUIPMENT AND NO TRESPASSI-.:G
SHJ.L:.. BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF ~HE
p~OTECrED AREA
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL AT A RADIUS EQUAL
TO " RAD!US/'" DIAMETER OF ,RE'E "'C REMAIN
4' MIN
5 TREE PROtECTION FENCE DETAIL
F1IW. DRAWING
NOT RElEASED
FOR CONSTRUCT1ON
f'lA TE. 8/t1OO
ATTACHMENT C
PAGE 8
~7241 4;8-2200 ,AX
" '"::,,, ,1,11./ v"'"
;',"{~~~ iV/I,
~\ .~, NO.:'~4e39 .~:~1
.<~}:-...~. ,('~0~';" u/')
;;;"".~':):::l,';.-';'-~ "..l/ V
''''''-''''8 - '1.\
AU DRAWINGS NotO wRITTEN MATERlAI.. CONTAINED
HEREiN ARE THE PROPERTY or ENGINEER
.\NO IAAY NOT BE DUPlICATEO. U$(D OR ClSClOSED
WrTHOlJT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ENGINEER
0.''''0'' So'otLo",
SOUTHEAST REGION
1015 AVIATION PARt'mAY
SUITE 100
MORRISVILlE. NC 27560
Phone; (9191469-9426
Fax: (919) 469.9967
1
RElEASE
OAT!:
6/20/00 ISSUED FOR REVIEW
7/24/00 ISSUED FOR ZONING
~E\'lSlONS
t.iO. OATE
& 8/9/00 REVlSEO PER CROWN
&
&
&,
&.
TI-'lS ORAWING IS COP"fflIGHT(C AND is r/..{E Sou:
PROPERTY OF THE OWNER. IT IS PRODUCED
SOtnv FOR USE BY THE OWNER AND 115 AFFiLIATES.
REPRooucnON OR USE OF TI-!l$ OAAWlN(; ,1,NO/OR
THE INFORMATlON CONTAINED IN 1T i$ ;-ORS100fN
'NI1HQuT THE wRlTl(N PERUISS:ON OF !i-l[ OWNER
DRAWN BY; CHS
CHECKED BY BTM
151Te: NAME
4
V ANCEV MILLS
1/2 MILE BRANCH ROAD
I $I'!"[ NUt.ABER
CVR-348E
I SITE ;\DDRESS
4521/2 MilE BRANCH ROAD
CROZET, VA 22932
SHEET TlfU:
SITE ELEVATIONS
I SHEET NUM8ER
C-7
6
I PL(" ~(:'\LE
31
(
..........
"'.. ATTACHMENT D
-..,
I
600
~
r ---
o 600
~~""
12:fO L, =:
I
I
SCALE IN FEET
(
(
.. ~.
ATTACHMENT E
~.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
40 I McIntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 - 5823
Fax (804) 972 - 4012
September 25, 2000
Valerie W. Long
McGuire Woods LLP
POBox 1288
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: ARS-P(SP}-2000-23 David Pastors (Triton peS), Tax Map 55, Parcel 93
Dear Ms, Long:
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on
Monday, September 18, 2000. The Board unanimously approved a Certificate of
Appropriateness, pending staff administrative approval of the following conditions:
1. Relocate the access road so than on-site vegetation provides screening in this area, or
provide assurance that no trees will be cut on parcel 19D, for example a tree protection
easement. Depending on the character of the vegetation and the site, the easement may
not need to extend 200'. '
2. Indicate that no trees shall be cut within a 200' radius of the pole on parcel 93.
3. Clarify all submittal documents to indicate that the proposed height of the wooden pole is
99',
4. In notes referencing "the height of the tallest tree within 25 feet" please clarify that "site"
means "centerline of proposed wood pole" and use this notation consistently throughout
the submittal documents.
Please provide revised drawings or other information addressing these conditions at your earliest
convenience. When staff's review of this information indicates that all conditions of approval have
been met. a Certificate of Appropriateness may be issued,
If you have any questions. please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
,V J/ \
7n pIJ'P l1.- Y f, cJC ti. '-' 1
Margaret Pickart
Design Planner
I"'"
MPfjcf
Cc: File
33
f"-,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire RQad, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 . 5823
Fax (804) 972 - 4012
October 19, 2000
Katurah Roell
19S'Riverbend Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
RE: SP-2000-53 Limited Service Hotel (Tax Map 32, Parcel 410)
Dear Mr. Roell:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on October 17, 2000, unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted request for a two-year extension (to January 13, 2002) to the
Board of Supervisors. Please note that this approval is subject to the following conditions:
1, The use authorized by this special use permit shall be developed as a limited service hotel, not to
exceed 100 rooms in size, in general accord with the applicant's justification dated 8/21/98 and
initialed "SET" (copy attached),
2, The use authorized by this special use permit shall be limited to approximately 4,5 acres in size.
3, The final site plan for the limited service hotel shall not be approved until after approval of a
development plan for the entirety of Tax Map 32, Parcel 41 D,
Please be advised that the Albemarle County' Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive
public comment at their meeting on November 8, 2000. Any new or additional information regarding your
application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your
scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate
to contact me, .
Sincerely,
David B. Benish
Chief of Planning & Community Development
DBB/jef
ATTACHMENT
Cc:
Ella Carey
Jack Kelsey
Bob Ball
Amelia McCulley
Steve Allshouse
~
, . ~ection31.2.4.1 ofthe'~bemarle County Zoning Ordinance s~s.~7~~~~=~;:~~~1~(
_ hereby reserves l;Into.irs.e1f the right to issue a11special use permits permitte~ hereunder. Special u
permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the board of supervise
that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, that the character of the distri
will not be changed thereby and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of t1:
ordinance. with the uses permitted by rightin tbe district. with additional regulations provided in secti<
5.0 ofthisordinance~ and with the publichealth..safety~ and general welfare.
The' items whic~ follow will ~e reviewed by the staff in their analysis of your request. Please comple
this form and provide additional information which will assist the County in its review, of your reque~
If you need assistance fill.in:g out these items. staff is available. .
What is the Comprehensive Plan designation for this property? C -1 L I
'.
Howwilltheproposedspecialuseaffectadjacentproperty? The adj acent property. should be favorably
affected by this use. The adjacent property is or will .become commercial, reta:
office. It will provide additional services to the surrounding community that <
not currently available nearby.
How will the proposed special use affect the character of the disttict surrounding the property? The c ha r ac t e r 0 f tr
district surrounding the subject property wiil also be favorably affected by this
Currently. there i!; no (lP-'lHry lodging': ,- . . :--.... in ,.hic:: ~"P::l . 'l'hp p""
of the subject property to the airport and 'to'severaf-'large office/institutional
projects now being developed will provide convenience and needed services to thes
surrounding properties.
How is the use in harmonv with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance? The special use of' a~'limited
serviec hotel ..' . - is in harmony with the purpose and interit 0
the zoning ordinance, if the intent and purpose of the ordinance is to situate
complementary land uses near one another for the convenience and safety of the
citizens of Albemarle County.
How is the use in harmony with the uses permilted by right in the disttict? This is. a complementary support
services for C-l zoning offices in the LI district, nearby UREF and the Airport.
What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of the Zoning Ordinance apply to this use? None
How will this use promote the public health. safety, and general welfare of the community? A limited service hQ1
will promote the public health, safecyand general welfa~
the community in the following ways: It will convert low value agricultural re,
estate thus increasing the tax base and tax revenue for the common good of the
citizens of Albemarle County; and the area where this proposed hotel,
located is currencly in need of a quality hotel property; and this hot
use will increase the value and encourage a development~of the proper1
nearby, bring more needed services to the citizens of Albemarle County.
~ .'.~~:'~
, . JM~..
'~..,: :'~~':~
14
,: ~.::/~' .J:~.~...~ j
_ ___u~- .; ~_. ."''1''''''''' ill u,;;'-'ili ......... .rici.l.lUe au perunem lIuormauon such as the numbers of persons
involved in the use, operating hours, and any unique features oithe use: Tn dpr;:ti1. ('l11T" T"pql1Pc;r i, tc
allow us to develop the 4.5~-+/- acre subject property into a 75-100 room limited
service hotel, . ~" . , ' The
hotel would be a-nationally recognized franchii;-of either Choice or Cendant
corporations.
hotel
~
-
would he ~@ven d~y~ ;:t-wppk
The hours of operation of the
-
ATTACHMENTS REQUIRED- provide two(2) copies of each:
f3
o
1.
Recorded plat or boundary survey of the property requested for the rezoning. If there is
no recorded plat or boundary survey, please provide legal description of the propeny and
the Deed Book and page number or Plat Book and page number.
2.
Note: If you are requesting a special use permit only for a portion of the property, it
needs to be described or delineated on a copy of the plat or surveyed drawing.
Ownership information - If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of legal
entity or organization including, but not limited to, the name of a corporation, partnership
or association, or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious name, a document acceptable to
the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing below ~ the authority
to do so.
If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must b~ .
submitted containing the owner's written consent to the application.
If the applicant is the agent of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be
submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency.
OPTIONAL ATTACHMENTS:
~
o
o
3.
4.
Drawings or conceptual plans, if any.
Additional Information, if any.
I hereby certify that I o~n the subject property, or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in
fIling this application. I also certify that the information provided is true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
POs+
[:r:u
1-. '\1s~-e..y
Printed Name
<g-h, )7~
.
Date
I'
9"7r -5t <6/
Daytime phone number of Signatory
..-.,
~d-
15
~
( ,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUtIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
SP 00-53, Limited Service Hotel
AGENDA DATE: ITEM NUMBER:
Planning Commission, October 17, 2000
Board of Supervisors, November 8, 2000
SUBJECTIPROPOSALIREQUEST:
Request for extension of SP 98-47, Limited Service
Hotel, approved by the Board of Supervisors on July 13,
1999 and expires on January 13,2001. The applicant is
also requesting deletion of one condition of approval.
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: INFORMATION:
STAFF CONT ACT(S):
David Benish
ATTACHMENTS:
Yes
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors approved SP 98-47 on January 13,1999 to locate a limited service hotel not exceeding
100 rooms. This activity required a special use permit in accordance with Section 22.2.2.7 ofthe Zoning Ordinance
(hotels, motels, and inns), The property (Tax Map 32, parcel4lD) is located on the West Side Route 29 (Seminole
Trail), across from the Forest Lakes commercial area in the Rivanna Magisterial District. It'is designated for
Regional Service uses in the Comprehensive Plan and is in the Community of Hollymead (Attachment A, Location Map),
The Board of Supervisor's action is Attachment B. The prior staff report for SP 98-47 and the minutes from the
Planning Commission's review of the request are provided and as Attachments C and D,
DISCUSSION:
The applicant is requesting an extension of the special use permit. There is no change to the request proposed by the
applicant. This property has been subject to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request (CPA 98-03, Hollymead
Town Center) which has been under review by the Planning Commission since the approval of this special use permit.
The Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing on October 17,2000 to consider the CPA. Because of the
CPA review, the applicant has been unable to move forward with a with a development plan for this property.
Regarding the extension of the special permit, staff opinion is that a development plan for the property cannot
be pursued until there is final solution of the proposed CPA. Additional time will be necessary for to allow the
CP A to be reviewed and acted on by the Board of Supervisors. The applicant has been actively pursuing solution
of the CPA. There has been no major change in circumstance to the area or County policies/regulations since the
original approval that would impact the review of this proposal. Therefore, an extension of the approval for this
proposal is justified
The applicant has also requested relief from the condition of approval, which states: "The final site plan for the limited
service hotel shall not be approved until after approval of a development plan for the entirety of Tax Map 32, Parcel 41B."
1
The operator of the hotel has indicated that there is the potential oflosing the franchise before a
development plan for the property can be approved,
This condition was recommended by the Planning Commission as a means to ensure that there
was an overall, coordinated plan for the development of the whole parcel before any portion of the
property was developed. Staff opinion is that there is no change in circumstance from the prior review
that which would warrant waiving this condition.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval ofthis request for 18 months with the same conditions as previously by
the Board. Those conditions are provided in Attachment B,
A TT ACHMENTS:
A- Location Map
B- Board of Supervisor's action letter for SP 98-18
C- Staff Report for SP 98- 47
D- Planning Commission Minutes
~
/~,
2
ATTACHMENT A
COUNTY
3
SECTIOt-'
TS
ALBEMARLE
zo
.~
r~
/
/
/
/
"
':. !lz
\ :~~ J
\ '"0 /;/
~g~ I - . _
:0; l~'-' '0.
"\ :~~ /~~, -- ~....'\
\"~:t/!l ".....:..
.OIl. 'D.,
l) . 'OJ, 1"'->, "",,
Ij "'-<...;' ~":.'
l? ',:::-,
/,....
//1\
III~
, I.
:,:y
,'if
,'/l
'/' "'"
~
/j '--
SCAl.E.
-
FEE'"
,-
66
31
~
ATTACHMENT B
~,
January 27, 1999
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road, Room 218
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296 . 5823
Fax (804) 972 - 4035
Katurah Roell
195 Riverbend Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
RE: SP-98-47 Limited Service Hotel, Tax Map 32, Parcel41D
Dear Mr, Roell:
~,
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on January 13, 1999, unanimously
approved the above-noted request for a lOa-room limited service hotel on approximately 45
acres located west of the Forest Lakes commercial area. Please note that this approval is subject
to the following conditions:
1, The use authorized by this special use permit shall be developed asa limited service
hotel, not to exceed 100 rooms in size, in general accord with the applicant's justification
dated 8/21/98 and initialed" SET" (copy attached).
2. The use authorized by this special use permit shall be limited to approximately 4,5 acres
In size.
3. The final site plan for the limited service hotel shall not be approved until after approval
of a development plan for the entirety of Tax Map 32, Parcel 41D,
In the event that the use, structure or activity for which this special use permit is issued shall not
be commenced within eighteen (18) months after the issuance of such permit, the same shall be
deemed abandoned and the authority granted thereunder shall thereupon terminate. For purposes
of this section, the term "commenced" shall ~e construed to include the commencement of
construction of any structure necessary to the use of such permit within two (2) years from the
date of the issuance thereof which is thereafter completed within one (1) year.
Before beginning this use, you must obtain a zoning clearance from the Zoning Department.
Before the Zoning Department will issue a clearance, you must comply with the conditions in
this letter. For further information, please call Jan Sprinkle at 296-5875,
~ .--....
4
Page 2
1""\ January 27, 1999
If you should h~ve any questions or comments regarding the above-noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
. ,
VWC/jcf
Cc: Amelia McCulley
Jack Kelsey
Tex Weaver
Steve Allshouse
Post Office Land Trust
Howard 1. Burnette.
5
ATTACHMENT C
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
SUSAN THOMAS
DECEMBER 1,1998
JANUARY 13, 1999
,--.-...,
SP 98-47 LIMITED SERVICE HOTEL
Applicant's Proposal
The applicant is requesting approval for a 100 room limited service hotel on approximately 4.5
acres located west of the Forest Lakes commercial area, with access from Route 29 North via the
[proposed] Timberwood Boulevard "Extended."
Hotels, motels and inns are allowed by special use permit in the C-1 zoning district.
Petition
Special use permit request for a 100 room limited service hotel [22.2.2.7] on a portion ofa 37+
acre parcel, zoned C-1, Commercial, EC, Entrance Corridor, and AlA, Airport Impact Area, and
described as Tax Map 32 Parcel 41D. The property is located west of Route 29 North (Seminole
Trail) and the Forest Lakes North commercial area, and south of State Route 649 (Airport Road),
in the Rivanna Magisterial District. This site is designated for Regional Service in the
Community of Holly mead. (See Attachment A, location map~ Attachment B, plat; Attachment C,
applicant's justification) ...-.,
Character of the Area: The east and west sides of Route 29 North are a developing commercial
area presently characterized by business establishments primarily oriented to serving
Neighborhood and Community Service needs. With the construction of the United States Postal
Service distribution facility to the northwest of this site, it is anticipated that the Route 29
commercial corridor will become more closely linked with Airport Road and the area in between
(including this site) will developed as a continuation of the Forest Lakes North commercial
center.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has reviewed the proposal for conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, and the criteria
listed in Section 31.2.4',1 of the Zoning Ordinance, and recommends denial.
Plannin!!: aDd ZOOiD!!: History
ZMA 84-02 - Approval by BOS March 21, 1984, to rezone 2.44 acres, from RA, Rural Areas, to .
HC, Highway Commercial [subject property located on Airport Road, previously described as a
portion of Parcel 41D, now Parcel41H].
/-~.,
6
,1".',
ZMA 86-02 - Approval by BOS September 15,1986, to rezone 6.65 acres from RA, Rural
Areas, to CO, Commercial Office; approval to rezone 48.13 acres from RA, Rural Areas, to LI,
Light Industry. Proffers include:
1) Access to U. S. Route 29 will be limited to one point, at a proposed cross-over [intersection of
Timberwood Blvd and Route 29] . .. This connection will not be made until the proposed
, cross-ever has been constructed.
2) Sanitary sewer will be extended to this tract prior to such time that the cumulative total need
for wastewater disposal exceeds the quantity of waste' water that would have been generated
by the total development of this tract into 2 acre residential lots (i.e., 27 lots .at 300gpd, or
8,000 gallons per day). The Planning Commission may require the extension of sanitary
sewer to this property at any time they deem access to public sewer to be reasonably
available.
ZMA89-08 - Approval by BOS September 20, 1989, to rezone 11.4 acres of the 48.13 acre
parcel from LI, Light Industry, to C-l, Commercial with proffered plan of development as to
uses within the area proposed for C-l, Commercial, and a more general plan for development of
acreage to remain LI, Light Industrial (subject to prior proffers). The 1104 acres rezoned C-l,
fronting on Route 29 North, were subject to the special use permits filed concurrently and
approved with conditions (see below). Proffers include:
1) acceptance of applicants proffer [proffered plan of development as to uses within the area
proposed for C-l, Commercial and a more general plan of development for acreage to remain
LI, Light Industrial] in addition to proffers accepted under ZMA 86-02, subject to site review
and parking provisions of the Zoning Ordinance;
2) Acceptance of the applicant's proffer of a 35-foot sethackfrom Route 29 with landscaping;
3) Acceptance of the applicant's proffer to work with staff in developing a landscaping plan.
. SP 89-71 - Approved by BOS September 20, 1989, for the location of a skating rink in
accordance with Section 22.2.2.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Board approved this request
with the condition that location and size are subject to ZMA 89-08. The Special Use Permit
approval has expired.
SP 89-72 - Approved by BOS September 20, 1989, for the location ofa motel in accordance
with Section 22.2.2.7 of the Zoning Ordinance,. The Board approved this request with the
condition ofa maximum of 144 units in a location consistent with ZMA 89-08. The Special Use
Permit approval has expired.
SP 89-73 - Approved by BOS September 20, 1989, for the location of a drive-through bank in
accordance with Section 22.2.2.10 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Board approved this request
with the condition that location and size are subject to ZMA 89-08. The Special Us'e Permit
approval has expired.
2
7
ZMA 94-21- Approval by BOS March 15, 1995, to amend the previous proffers ofZMA 89-08 /-----.
to allow all uses permitted by-right in the C-l Comm.ercial District, subject to the following
proffers:
1) Proffer to maintain Route 29 entrance at present Forest Lakes crossover;
2) Proffer that a minimum 50 foot right-of-way shall be reserved for dedication upon request of
Albemarle County, Such right-of-way shall allow for connection of Route 29 and route 649,
Access to adjoining parcels may be required at time of site plan or subdivision review.
. ComDrehensive Plan: This area is recommended for Regional Service in the Land Use Plan,
and lies within the Community of Holly mead. In Table I: Non Residential Land Use Guidelines
on page 31 of the Plan, thePurposelIntent of the Regional Service designation is described as,
"Comparison shopping and specialized goods and services." Table I describes Typical Primary
Uses as, "Community service uses, plus: Major department store - Auto dealer - Mobile home
sales - Motel/hotel - Hospital." ,
The Land Use Plan contains a number of specific recommendations related to the Route 29
Corridor in the Community of HoIIymead Profile (pp, 78-81), in the area designated Regional
Service located to the south of the Airport Road intersection and across from Forest Lakes North:
. Hollymead is intended to be a mixed use community that allows people to live in close
proximity to their workplace, shopping and service areas. A wide variety of housing types,
service and jobs are anticipated. Community:.wide automobile dependence should be reduced by
encouraging transit-oriented development and providing a full range of pedestrian and bicycle
facilities such as walkways and bike paths that connect the residential and transit nodes to the
employment/shopping and service areas.
/~
. Provide linkage between neighborhoods within the Hollymead Community (including non-
residential areas) through the use of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, greenways/linear parks,
roads, and transit alternatives. The emphasis is on linkage between development areas, not just
within each development.
. Development plans along Route 29 North are to be sensitive to its status as an Entrance
Corridor Roadway.
. The Regional Service area on the West side of Route 29, South of Airport Road (opposite
Forest Lakes North and cemetery), shall be limited to three entrance locations on Route 29.
. Development along Route 29 North is to have controlled access to the roadway. This can be
accomplished through joint entrances, collector roads parallel to 29, and roads internal to the
development,
.Develop alternative modes of transportation to serve the HoIIymead Community, particularly
large employment generating areas, This may be accomplished through the partnership between
developers of large employment generating areas and the Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO),
.~
8
3
STAFF COMMENT:
r"",
In making its recommendation for all Special Use permits,staff addresses the provisions of
Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Board of SUDervisors' hereby reserves unto itself the ri2ht to issue all sDecial use
Dermits Dermitted hereunder. SDecialuse Dermits for uses as Drovided in this ordinance
may be issued UDon a findin2 by the Board of SUDervisors that such use will not be of
substantial detriment to adiacent DroDerlY.
This site lies within a designated development area, and in fact already is zoned for commercial
development. It is surrounded by property that either is similarly zoned C-l or designated for
Regional Service, Office Service, or Industrial Service, respectively, pending future rezoning.
Depending upon the specific types of development that occur adjacent to the site and/or within
the larger Community, the proposed hotel may constitute a supporting or primary use. In either
case, no detriment to adjacent property is anticipated from the hotel use itself.
However, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) request to change the designation of the
residue of this parcel (located immediately to the west of this site) has been submitted by the
same applicant, and in the opinion of staff approval of this special use permit should be deferred
until the CPA has been acted upon by the Commission, The Commission will first decide
whether the CPA request should be scheduled for public hearing, after which the CPA itself will
be considered. If the CPA moves forward, staff may suggest an increase in the area requested
for amendment to include adjacent acreage that in the opinion of staff should incorporated in the
review, The CPA first comes before the Commission December 8, in the form of a Resolution of
Intent.
Approval of this special use permit, which is anticipated to be followed by site development [by-
right], could inadvertently constrain master planning of the larger commercial area. This site,
along with the neighboring property to the south designated for Regional and Office Service, and
to the west designated for Industrial Service (that area requesting amendment to Regional'
Service), constitute one of the largest undeveloped commercial areas currently designated within
the Community ofHoIlymead and Albemarle County. Therefore, staff urges the Commission to
fully utilize this opportunity to plan in a comprehensive manner.
that the character of the district will not be chane:ed thereby.
Until recommendations are developed for the area as a whole, it is difficult to accurately analyze
the impact of a hotel in this location on the character of the district. It is clear that demand exists
for additional commercial acreage, converting it from industrial usage, but because this request
has not yet undergone public review, staff has no information regarding design standards, site
planning, road network, drainage and water detention, orientation of the development (e.g., to
Route 29 versus an internal orientation) or other issues that would determine the appropriateness
ofa hotel on this site. (Although the applicant's consultant has prepared a traffic study and
submitted it to VDOT for review, no comments have been received to date and thus
transportation requirements are still largely unknown.) Staff does not find that the hotel use
4
9
would negatively affect the character of the district, but cannot make a recommendation for /___.
approval on this site without more information on the commercial area as a whole, For example,
a full service hotel providing meeting facilities for the neighborhood, one or more restaurants,
and larger capacity might better meet the needs of the Community as described in a [future] Plan
Amendment than this request, which contemplates a limited service facility.
and that such use will be in harmony with the ouroose and intent of this ordinance.
Staff has reviewed the purpose and intent of the ordinance as stated in Sections lA, 1.5, and 1.6.
Staff finds that the proposal meets the purpose and intent expressed in the following provisions:
1.4.7 "To encourage economic development activities that provide desirable
employment and enlarge the tax base;"
1.6 "In drawing the zoning ordinance and districts with reasonable
consideration of the Comprehensive Plan, it is a stated and express
purpose of this zoning ordinance to create land use regulations which shall
encourage the realization and implementation of the Comprehensive Plan.
To this end: development is to be encouraged in Villages, Communities
and the Urban Area '" and development is not to be encouraged in the
Rural Areas . . ."
However, without the benefit of a plan for the area as a whole, staff finds that the proposal does
not demonstrate that it meets the ilitent of the following provisions:
~
'1.4.3 "To facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and
harmonious community;"
1.4.6 "To protect against one or more of the following:
overcrowding of land, undue density of population in
relation to the community facilities existing or available,
obstruction of light and air, danger and congestion in travel
.and transportation, or loss of life, health, or property from
fire, flood, panic or other dangers."
with the uses oermitted bv ri2ht in the district.
The proposed use does not conflict with the uses permitted by right in the district, and in fact
may support those uses by meeting the needs of business travelers using the airport andlor others
traveling Route 29. Again, staff's concern is not with the use itself, but with possible future
constraints that could and often do arise when a single use is approved without first
demonstrating that its development will coordinate with development of the surrounding, larger
area. Similarly, it is difficult to ascertain if the hotel use as conceived by this application best fits
the area as a whole.
~
5
10
with additionalre2ulations Drovid~d ill Section 5.0 of this ordinance.
r".
Section 5.0, Supplementary Regulations, of the ordinance does not address this Special Use
permit request for a limited service hotel.
and with the DubHe health. safetv. and 2eneral welfare.
Staff cannot identify any adverse effects to the public health, safety, and general welfare that will
occur if the limited service hotel use is approved, Staff notes that the applicant must comply
with the Site Development Plan requirements set forth in Section 32.0 of th~ Zoning Ordinance,
and that little or no information is available on the siting of this facility due to the timing of this
request relative to review of the area as a whole under the submitted CPA.
SUMMARY:
The hotel use does not appear to create negative impacts to the Community of Holly mead,
although it presently is not clear whether a limited service concept is appropriate for a
commercial area as large and significant as this one. Stairs objection to approval of this. request
centers on questions of process: with questions about the land use designation of the
surrounding, larger parcels coming before the County in the very near future, it would be unwise
to impose limitations on future development by prematurely approving a use of substantial size
like this one.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends denial of the special use permit request, based on the premature timing of this
application relative to the CPA request. Should the Commission find in favor of this request,
staff recommends the following conditions of approval: .
1. Facility shall be operated in general accord with the applicant's justification dated
8/21/98 and initialed "SET;"
2. Facility shall be limited to approximately 4.5 acres and 100 rooms in size.
~
J..
ATTACHMENTS:
"
,..-:.
A - Location Map
B - Plat
C - Justification for Special Use Permit by Applicant
A: \sp9847 limited service hotel.doc
6
11
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
20
...
-<;;.lX '
,,/'.Uf'. '
\...
,''''
.,.
.,..
12
ATTACHMENT A
SEel
s
...
-
s.::;4L.t
\
66
1'.
,1
. ,.?'~;~:!::;j~F~.~~~~:~')'11
'~'.' ,."..,~r,"~"'r'>-"
,':: X~:::::~~1((:t.
. :;~~~,;/~':'-"":'i
',. . .'~'
--.......
I
...
/'. ...,
; \ c' \ ' ", \
1 '
,
\
,
,
,I
~
\
flCP lZ'41!
..
/
/
I" 3Z- 46
~
..
. / IW )2-c18
,
A
'"
..
/
rHlt JZ-'l
/
I"
TNi' Ji!-uH
I
/
llG! J1-4I
I IWI' 32-0
~.
'v
~.
..,"1 ~'
..;: 1,,0
,,'J> ~
0-<'
<?.o
...
"'"
,
, ~HP 3Z- 4).1.
COMPOSITE SALES PLAT ...,
POPERTY OF JOE .WRIGHT )/'"
~ATEO ON RT. 29 NORTH
PPOSITF FOREST LAKE' S SUBOrv ISIOW
/
'"
SCAt.E r - zoo'
JIJL'f 27. 1994
T- F~ 1ft -.--.T
.... I.'",
REDUCED FOR CO~~rNC
r
N
i
t. , '1 i. 1\ ) \
I \ "k ,
ATTACHMENT 'I
'"
...
I
, \
"I." .
I.. :....1:. ~t.
, .,;..
'~'~l'~'
.'
.~. '
'.'
'"
; -- t i..J..~~
! fZ'r-4- s_ J-
$'t-',\'5 .
~~
13
\,).",.. . _ '...... I""'..''''''''-'''I...a~a '-J
~ection31.2.4.1 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance states' that. -''The board ot SUpervISOrs
hereby reserves I;1nto.itself the right to issue all special use permits permitte~ hereunder. Special use
permits for uses as provided in this ordinance may be issued upon a finding by the board of supervisors
that such use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, that the character of the district
, r--..
will not be changed thereby and that such use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent ( Lis
ordinance, with the uses permitted by right in the district. with additional regulations provided in section
5.0 of this ordinance. and with the public healthLsafetyand general welfare.
The items whic~ follow will be reviewed by the staff in their analysis of your request. Please complete
this form and provide additional information which will assist the County in its review, of your request.
If you need assistance filling out these items. staff is available.
What is the Comprehensive Plan designation for this property? C-l LI
"
How will the proposed special use affect adjacent property? The adjacent property. should be favorably
affected by this use. The adjacent property is or will become commercial, retail
office. It will provide additional services to the surrounding' community that aI
not currently available nearby.
How will the proposed special use affect the character of the district surrounding the property? The character of th~
district surrounding the subject property will also be favorably affected by this
Currently. there i..c; no qll;:!lity lnnging ( .- .- ..-.... ..., ;n 1"";<: ::n''''~ ''l'"", l'T"n'
of the subject property to the airport and 'to"severa.l'-'Iarge office/institutional'
projects now being developed will provide convenience and needed services to thes
surrounding properties.
How is the use in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance? The special use 0 f - a "limi~
serviec hotel . ' - is in harmony with the purpose and inte\o
the zoning ordinance, if the intent and purpose of the ordinance is to situate
complementary land uses near one another for the convenience and safety of the
citizens of Albemarle County.
How is the use in harmony with the uses permilted by right in the district? This is a complementary support
services for C-l zoning offices in 'the LI district, nearby UREF and the Airport,
What additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of the Zoning Ordinance apply to this use? None
How will this use promote the public health. safety, and general welfare of the community? A limited service h
will promote the public health, safety and general welf
the community in the following ways: It will convert . low value agricultural r
estate thus increasing the tax base and tax revenue for the common good of the
citizens of Albemarle County; and the area where this proposed hotel.
located is currently in need of' a quality hotel property; and thi.--4::
use will increase the value and encourage a development~of the pr
nearby, bring more needed services to the citizens of Albemarle County.
~ .'.~~:'~
,..~'.'"
.. /M~. " , - .' ;~:., ',;
.':';'~~~ ..>..~,:>:...t...,.~
1~
__~... __ _-';;';:'<;~-_.;"",':'.':,^",;:'-~'...~,;,::-,;;;,:-;;;,,+--:~'~'i':~::'F:";::"\.;:::.i:';'~'~..,;,-:.;........,-,-..........&..i..o.-.vU .::)....-........ ~ W~ 4..U..........i.i,..i..;;;....;J V.l. tJCi'.:>v.lJ..":)
involved in tlle use. operating hours, and any unique feawres of the use: Tn d~r;d '1 , onr rpqll~<;t" 1 S-
allow us t"~ develop the 4.5~-+/-.acre subject property into a 75-100 room limited.
service hotel, - . ~' . , ThE
hotel would be a nationaLly "recognized franchise-of either Choice or Cendant
corporations.
~
hotel
.
would b~ seven days a-wepk.
The hours of operation of the
ATTACHMENTS REQUIRED - provide two(2) copies of each:
!3
1.
Recorded plat or boundary survey of the property requested for the rezoning. If there. is
no recorded plat or boundary survey , please provide legal description of the property and
the Deed Book and page number or Plat Book and page number.
o
2.
Note: If you are requesting a special use permit only for a portion of the property, it
needs to be described or delineated on a copy of the plat or surveyed drawing.
Ownership information - If ownership of the property is in the name of any type of legal
entity or organi,.~tion including. but not limited to, the name of a corporation. partnership
or association. or in the name of a trust, or in a fictitious name. a document acceptable to
the County must be submitted certifying that the person signing below has the authority
to do so.
If the applicant is a contract purchaser, a document acceptable to the County must be
submitted containing the owner's written consent to the application.
If the applicant is the agent of the owner, a document acceptable to the County must be
submitted that is evidence of the existence and scope of the agency.
- .4
OPTIONAL A IT ACHMENTS:
o
o
3.
4.
Drawings or conceptual plans, if any.
Additional Information, if any.
I hereby certify that I own the subject property, or have the legal power to act on behalf of the owner in
f1ling this application. I also certify that the information provided is true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge. ~ ~
(Os+ \fV.s
~ hi )f~
.
~
3rL( ~ l.. ';s ~ -e..Y'
Printed Name
'.Ile-
Date
I'
c;7i -5{ <6/
Daytime phone number of Signato11'
~d.
15
SP 98-47 Limited Service Hotel ATTACHMENT 0
Special use permit request for a 100 room limited service hotel [22.2.2.7] on,a POrtil
37+acre parcel, zoned C-l, Commercial, EC, Entrance Corridor, and AlA, Airport Impact Area,
as described as Tax Map 32 Parcel41D. The property is located west of Route 29 North
(Seminole Trail) and the Forest Lakes North commercial area, and south of State Route 649
(Airport Road), in the Rivanna Magisterial District. The site is designated for Regional Service
in the Community ofHollymead.
Ms. Thomas presented the staff report, referencing a "concept map" submitted by the applicant
solely for purposes of information and illustration. She pointed out the proposed hotel site and
1()4
~.
~,
,---
,\6
~.
other uses for the eI:1tire parcel which would come to the Commission through other projects,
giving a general sense of the poteIitial site layout. Ms. Thomas illustrated the road alignment,
stating that VDOT has not officially commented on the plan, and said that it appears to be a
workable alignment given the site's topography. She said the hotel plan is the first proposal for
the 37-acre parcel, and told the Commission that the applicant's CPA amendment request to
redesignate the rear of the parcel for more commercial usage will come to them on December 8th.
Ms. Thomas added that although she did not identify negative impacts, she felt the best planning
process for the parcel as a whole would be served by looking at the CPA for the larger area, then
"fitting in the smaller pieces. "
Mr. Rooker mentioned the 1989 approval of SP 89-72 which allowed for a 144-unit hotel on the
property, and asked Ms. Thomas if something has happened since then that makes the current
proposal less desirable. Ms. Thomas responded no, but she felt "it was im.possible to know
where. best to site the hotel or how best to. . . . develop the parcel when the future of the larger area
is somewhat in question at the applicant's request. That Comprehensive Plan amendment was
not initiated by staff, rather by the same applicant.,. .there's a feeling that the are~ may undergo
h "
some c ange....
1""".
Mr. Rooker asked whether staff supported SP 89-72. Mr. Cilimberg said that coincided with the
rezoning of the property, and at that point there was no question about changing the Compo Plan
designation for a larger area. "It was simply within the plan that the rezoning occur, and the
special use permit was necessary with that rezoning for the hotel to be developed. We were
dealing at that point in time with no question of changing the Comprehensive Plan or expanding
the commercial to a larger area. We were simply dealing with a rezoning and that special use
permit which were before us at the time and actually included a conceptual plan of how the
different uses would be . laid out under that rezoning action. It was a different time and I think
different circumstances in terms of what future uses might be occurring."
The applicant's representative, Katurah Rowell, addressed the Commission. He said that the
hotel is clearly in the C-l district, and driving force for the rezoning application is the. Cannike
Theater project in the rear of the property, which consumes 12.5 acres. Mr. Rowell said the
request for the special use permit is specifically for the hotel; if that is approved, then they would
submit a site plan as supplemental information for the entire rezoning of the project. '"It's hard to
request them to go to the expense of doing all their site plan work not knowing whether or not a
hotel is even permissible. There will not be an application for a site plan until the whole project
is under consideration." Mr. Rowell told Commissioners that if the special use permit is
approved, then the applicants would follow up with a Compo Plan with individual site plans for
Cannike Theaters, the hotel, a restaurant, and projects for the front of the property. Mr. Rowell
said he would be. coordinating all the site plans for each individual part to make a unified
landscaping approach for the parcel.
Mr. Rooker clarified with Mr. Rowell that whether or not the Comprehensive Plan change is
approved for the rest of the property, the applicant's intent is to go forward with the hotel plan
for that portion of the parcel. Mr. Rowell said "That location is the only suitable section of the
land where we can make a flat enough spot to put a building of that size."
Mr. Finley asked about the previously approved special use pennits that have expired, and asked
why this permit needed to be approved before the CPA goes through. Mr. Rowell responded that
there was a previous owner to the property, and those deals fell through, so he put the property
17
on the market. He said that the applicant was not eager to spend a lot of money on site plans
without knowing whether or not a hotel would be allowed there.
I
Mr. Howard Burnette, President of Southeastern Associates (the potential property owner and
hotel operator), addressed the Commission. He described their plan for a "suites" hotel, with 80
to 100 rooms, and would include the 4.5 acre parcel behind it for a limited service restaurant.
The hotel would include some meeting rooms for business purposes and a swimming pool, and
the rooms would be a larger 2-room style with microwaves, small refrigerators and other
convemences.
Mr. Burnette said that they have already spent $30,000 in study, and did not wish to spend any
more until they could tell the franchiser they have a properly zoned parcel. He acknowledged
that by getting the zoning designation, they are not getting approval of the site plan and hence
could not build the hotel until the overall plan, including ingress/egress to Route 29, is approved
next year. "From a business point of view, we simply would like to the comfort as we move
forward in outlaying fun<is... we have a parcel.that is properly zoned."
Mr. Ed Coleman, Chainnan of Southeastern Associates, addressed the Commission. In response
to Mr. Thomas' question about the definition of a limited service hotel, Mr. Coleman said that
their proposed facility would not have room service or a full sit-down restaurant or general
alcohol service. He said there would be a nicely appointed deluxe continental breakfast area and
other amenities in individual high-quality rooms that would be priced accordingly. Mr. Coleman
said they are trying to establish a residential look to the properties, including building materials
and landscaping.
Mr. Rooker asked what the timing would be for development of the parcel if the special use
permit is approved. Mr, Coleman responded that once all permits are approved, it could take up
to 12 months to construct and open the facility. He added that they want to move forward as
quickly as possible once the site is approved.
Public comment was invited. None was given, and the matter was placed before the
Commission.
Mr. Thomas asked Ms. Thomas why she recommended denial of the permit. She responded, "1
recommended denial on really the basis of the process. It wasn't so much that I had a problem
with the hotel use or anticipated negative impacts from it, but I [was] quite influenced by the
Southpoint process, and I felt we ended up with a very good product and I would never assume
that I could anticipate the kinds of design guidelines that might come out of a Comprehensive
Plan amendment like the Southpoint amendment. And although this property can certainly
develop on its own without that CPA, I think it's always beneficial if you can unify an area
through design. . . ,"
She added that because VDOT has not yet responded, the road alignment could float and
influence the development of the site. "Once the SP is granted, the site development is a
ministerial act, and there really is no way of holding that off to time it with the [CPA] so that we
know some answers about the larger site before the hotel develops.., Jjust felt that the cleanest
way to do it is to look at the big picture first and then go down to the micro level. It's not really
the use, it's the process."
/-."
~'.
,...----..,
18
Mr. Rooker asked if it would be feasible to accomplish those objectives with additional
conditions. Ms. Thomas responded that because she didn't know the larger site would layout
such as the possible locations of the regional stormwater facility and pedestrian networks, she
couldn't anticipate what to include as conditions.
I""
Mr, Rooker commented that if the CPA was not behind this, the reason for recommending denial
would not exist because the proposal would be considered in isolation. Ms. .Thomas stated, "We
do have th,e opportunity for some master planning that we don't often have, and in my view this
is a very significant commercial area in a. portion of the county that is trying pretty hard to
develop its own identity, and I think this commercial area is going to be a key part of that. I felt
that it was advantageous to do everything possible to do a unified planning job."
Mr. Rooker suggested adding a condition that stated the site plan would not be approved until a
master plan for the. overall property is developed. Mr. Kamptner said a condition could provide a
link to ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan.
, .
In response to Mr. Rooker's suggestion that a condition to clarify the intended design of the
facility, Mr. Cilimberg responded that if approval were recommended, it would be preferable that
the Commission not include any design conditions because the property is in the entrance
corridor, and the ARB has asked that they not be "hamstrung" by design conditions, Mr.
Cilimbergcommented that if a condition is placed that states no site plan would move forward
until there is a master plan, the time frame could end up running longer than a special use permit
is valid. Mr. Kamptner added that the Board of Supervisors can extend the special use permit
period.
"...... Mr. Nitchmann expressed concern that if the Compo Plan process take~ a year or more to go
through review, it might affect the applicant's window of opportunity. Mr. Nitchmann asked the
applicant, "If we approve the SP with a condition that says you have to wait until there is a
comprehensive site plan developed for this area and it has to go through the Comprehensive Plan
process first and that takes a year and a half, is that still within your window of opportunity or
, acceptable to you?"
Mr. Burnette said it is acceptable to Southeas.tem Associates, and told Commissioners that
Virginia Land Company has allowed them to extend their option through January without
additional fees, and are content to continue. Mr. Burnette said they have no problem with a
condition that requires a plan for the entire site before the hotel piece proceeds. Mr. Coleman
said he wasn't sure how long the franchiser would be willing to wait, but if the special use permit
was granted Southeastern would be willing to spend money to see if the deal would work. Mr.
Burnette recalled that the particular franchiser for their proposed hotel provides an I8-month
window, and gave the date of November 25th as the start of that 18 months. "Once we sign that
document and send them the $50,000... .we've got 18 to 24 months to break ground. Their'
definition of breaking ground is digging and pouring footers," .
Nfr. Finley asked if the CPA is supposed to come to resolution next week. Ms. Thomas clarified
that the first step of the CPA comes to the Commission next week. Mr. Cilimberg said step one
is for the Commission to decide whether it is worth considering the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment by passing a resolution of intent, which then goes to the Board for passage. He said
that the resolution outlines staff's initial findings as to the relevance of moving forward with the
CPA, then the Commission decides whether or not it is worth moving forward. Mr. Cilimberg
19
said the sta.ff"s recommendation notes several points regarding this specific area, and provides
language for that.
~.
He added that while this particular property is what has instigated the review, the Board and the
Commission typically look at the larger overall area, not just a parcel, in their consideration. Mr.
Cilimberg added, "If the Board were to pass a special use permit with conditions as you've
included, what we would know is that for whatever period of time that special use permit is
approved for, a limited service hotel could go on this parcel within the conditions established.
Otherwise, how that would fit, how it would be accessed, how other land uses would relate,
would end up being part oftheComp. Plan amendment and ultimate rezoning and master plan."
Mr. Rieley commented, "It seems to me that all of those things are going to hold up the final plan
for this particular parcel anyway. I have to admit that I am in agreement with staff completely
on this - I think the approval of this as a discreet element really limits the possibilities for the
rest of the property, particularly because of it's location almost in the middle of the
property... ..the phrase that our colleague Mr. Anderson used at one time not in relation to this
project of 'ready, fire, aim' planning comes to mind. I think that staff is exactly right that this is
going to be missing a huge opportunity to look at this in a cohesive way. If this had been
presented to us with a very compelling plan and this as an element of it. . . I think I would feel a
little bit different about it I think that we can do a lot better with this piece of property than the
suggestions that are in the outlying parcels on this. I think once this goes... we've lost an awful
lot of flexibility in dealing with the rest of the property."
Mr. Finley asked if the special use permit does not.pin down the exact location of the property
could it still be fit into a master plan. Mr. Cilimberg said that the SP is for a portion of a 37+ ~.
acre parcel, and nothing in the conditions actually pins down the location, just the size, and asked
Mr. Kamptner to clarify whether the SP would allow for the hotel anywhere on that 37+ acres.
Mr. Kamptner replied, "Yes, and the condition puts a cap on the size ofthe hotel and the size of
the hotel site to 4.5 acres."
Mr. Rooker commented that the Commission could accomplish some planning objectives with
appropriate condition language while allowing the applicant to move forward with the project
financially with the franchiser. Mr. Cilimberg said the only part of the 37 acres that the special
use permit could apply to would be the C-I part, which would essentially be any location "below
the fold" topographically. Mr. Kamptner added that the Commission could impose a condition
that would place the hotel "in general accord with what's shown on a conceptual plan."
Mr. Rooker said that they may not want to pin it down any more so that they have the
opportunity to reconsider location appropriately within the master plan for the property. "It
would seem to me that the applicant and the County would have the option certainly at looking at
other locations at that time - the applicant being interested in getting all of the property approved
for development, and the County being interested in furthering the best plan for the property."
Mr. Finley commented, "But.ifhe's proceeding with the purchase, he's going to have to pin
something down.,.."
Mr, Rooker replied, "What he's pinned down is that he would have... the zoning right to build a
hotel at least somewhere on this 37 Y2 acre piece subject to subsequent approval of the overall
master plan for the larger development."
'-"
20
1""'"\
1'&, Nitchmann agreed with Mr. Rooker and said, "I think we need to .come up with some kind of
conditions to move this forward... we've got an applicant who's got an interested party; he's
already put in a substantial amount of money forward on this, and I can understand why he's not
willing to put any more money forward with just the hope that something will happen. This was
approved for a hotel before... I understand what our Comprehensive Plan says, but it really
concerns me that we can say we can deny something because we don't like the process it's going
through... .If the applicant withdraws his request for the Comprehensive Plan, he can... with a
special use pennit put the hotel there."
Mr. Loewenstein commented, "1 think that's a compelling point. 1 personally think... that this is
a good location for a hotel, and I think that ultimately a hotel is going to end up somewhere on
that parcel. It seems pretty clear. 1 think if there were a way to do it with appropriate conditions,
I would be willing to move forward on it." .
Mr. F~nley asked, "Can he move forward with a floating site?"
. .
Mr. Rieley shared his concern. "I'm having a hard time figuring out where the advantage is to
having a special use permit but not having an approved site. "
Mr. Rooker replied, "If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is never approved, then he is
enabled to go forward on this 37 Y2 acre piece with a hotel development....I don't think it's
necessarily fair to the applicant to make him wait in effect a year to fmd out whether he's going
. to get the [CPA]. approval and then go forward with a special use permit application which may
or may not be granted."
r"
Mr. Thomas said, "Ifhe wants to get the money, he has to get the zoning done beforehand...
before they'll even talk to you."
Mr. Cilimberg clarified, "I think what we are understanding you to say that if this were to be
recommended for approval. . . . there would need to be a third condition that essentially said no
site plan would be approved until such time as a master plan were approved following a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a subsequent rezoning." Mr. Kamptner provided technical
language to be included as the condition, and Mr. Cilimberg said it could be fine-tuned prior to
going to the Board.
Staff clarified the general plans for hotel operation provided by the .applicant in Attachment C in
Ms. Thomas' report.
In response to Mr. Loewenstein's question about any additional conditions needed, Mr.
Kamptner suggested that something be added to assure the validity of the special use pennit isn't
jeopardized by the process that may take place between now and the time they actually
"commence" the use.
Mr. Nitchmann said, "They have 18 months to do this from November 25th - they don't have 18
months to do this from the date that we get through running them through to wringer here. If
we're asking applicants to go through all of this work, it puts some obligation on our part that
says we'll have the CPA completed by February 15th or something." Mr, Nitchmami added that
it's the ,Commission's responsibility to start putting some dates that say the process will be
finished by a certain date, so an applicant knows when he can get funding and open a facility.
"From a staff standpoint, if you're going to recommend denial of something like this to do the
21
process, I think it behooves us as part of the government here to come up with some kind of
thing that says we're willing to our part with this if you're willing to do your part with it."
Mr. Rooker commented that Mr. Kamptner's suggestion acted to the benefit of the applicant.
~
Mr, Nitchmann said his concern remained that the applicant have an adequate window of time to
work within. "It seems that we're setting some precedence here from meeting to meeting."
Mr. Kamptner said that if the applicants fmd they are running up against the 18 month
commencement period. they can apply for an extension. Mr. Finley asked what would be
involved if an extension is needed. and Mr. Kamptner replied that it would come through the
Commission and Board of Supervisors processes again as a simple action, including public
hearing, with a reduced fee, .
Mr. Rieley said although he feels the approach is somewhat convoluted, he would support the
proposal "in hopes that we have crafted this with sufficient flexibility to allow us to get a good
project for the whole property."
MOTION: Mr. Rooker moved. Mr. Thomas seconded approval of SP 98-47 Limited Service
Hotel with the following changes to conditions: (1) Facility shall be developed as a limited
service hotel in general accord with the applicant's justification dated 8/21/98 and initialed
"SET"; (2) Facility shall be limited to approximately 4.5 acres and 100 rooms in size [stet]; and
an a'dditional condition (3) the final site plan for the limited service hotel shall not be approved
until after approval of a development plan for the entirety of Tax Map 32, Parcel 41D (language
will be clarified prior to Board of Supervisors meeting). Commissioners agreed with Mr.
Kamptner that the applicant not be jeopardized by the process that may take place between now
and the time the developers commence the use (within 18 months); the applicant could apply for
an extension if the 18-month window is not sufficient. The motion passed unanimously.
~
i ,.,.-.,..,..
22
-I
c
-
1:3
<OJ
~~
~
~
:E
.g'
~j
-~
~
€
o
Z
'W
g
:;;
~
@
i
~
'"
ill
DATE'; 12/22/00 TIME:09:29r20 Ac-r;OtJt~I; 003CLR000015004' RECEIPT;. ,00000024.033
CI}SHIER: PXM RES: ~BOl TYPE:DBS PAYI1EtH: FULL PI},{!1EXT .
INSTRUMENT ;'Ofi0016004 BDOK: PAEE: RECDRDED: 12/.22JOO AT 09:27
6RANTOR, NAME- ;'K1.MC!T'-L~ fA; ti-LflCALlTY; CO
GRA~!TEE t~AME' ;_CnUNTYOF ALBEMARLE J VA", ' EJ:M:PERCENT: lCO~
Itt~D:ADDRESS ,~ 40 1- ,MCINTIRE ROAD- [:HARLnTT~SV ILLE ~'W~
RECEIvED Of: CDUNTY- DFAlBEMARLE D~TE
.~ CHECK : $4'3 EU'! ~ 0& rASH~
DESC'R!PTIDN. 1: 32eS5 ACRES
,,-
c;
COr4S I OEHA T IflN.;: - l1 bOO~ QOP~, 00
CODE DESCRIPTIDN
301 DEEDS
039 DEEDS.AND CDNTRACTS
213 >~ CnUNTY'GRANTEE TAX
2:20 BRAttTDR-IAX
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
rA1
o.
~
'"
,,,,
.: ~~
~-
DFFIC!AL:RECEIPT
~[BEMARLE CIRCUIT" CDURT
DEED RECEIPT
Hi=' nt:.~"n:l
" $:l.~ 00
11/10100
Al"'f':HUr iHAI .
-H:;;;:;unCI :JHL.';
PAID tODE
.00
DESLR1PTIOt~
"?At3ES';
J~AMES ;
ur..n. "
HMf"i
16.00
2.400~Ol)
. BODa no
800.00
145
I.i~l ~
r.......:
038
DEEDS nF--CDr~VEYANLE
TRHMSFERFEES
212
CLERK DF COURT;
ca.U=i ,p.v T
..
TEl~DERED
:~t1DUNT PAID;
CHArJEEAMT
MARSHHLL
DC' 18 (6/00)
o
"
v
FMD
leOn
BOOwOO"
, i.CO
4,~glB'..OO
4',Bli'tDO
.00
+,
o
1A1
-
/"
prepared'by McClure, Callaghan & Atkins
Tax Map 9~, Parcels8E, ~o and ~~
THIS. DEED dated this 10th day of November, 2000, by and
betweenKIMCO, L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, the
Grantor, and the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA,' the Grantee,
whose address is: 401. Mc.Intire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902;
WITNESSETH:
THAT FOR AND IN' . CONSIDERAT10N of the sum of TEN DOLLARS
($1.0.00), and other go'od'andvaluable consideration, the receipt of
which is' hereby 'ackno.wleq,ged, the Grantor does hen~by GRANT,
BA:E(GAIJj, SELL and CONVEY with GENERAL WARRANTY andEN'.GLISH.
"
.COVENANTS OF TITLE unto Grantee all those parcels of real estate
situatedoIi State Route 620 in the County of Albemarle, Virginia,
containing 32.85 aCres, more or, less, being Parc.els8B, 10 and':!.l
on the Albemarle County Tax Map 91., and shown on Elat of Thomas B.
Lincoln Land Surveyor, Inc. dated December 19, 2000, attached
hereto and . made a part . hereof (the "Plat"); being portions of
property conveyed to the Grantor herein by deed of E. Grant Cosner
and"Barbara H. Cosner, husband and wife, dated December 16, 1992,
-recorded in said Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1.280, page 603.
This conveyance is subj ect to an easement for ingress and
egress over the existing old road, identified on the Plat as the
"old road bed".
Neither party hereto shall be responsible for
",
maintenance of the old road except that each party shall. be
responsible for the repair of any damage caused by its own use.
This co~veyance is further made subject to all other
easements, restrictions, reservations and conditions contained in
duly recorded deeds , plats and other instruments constituting
constructive 'notice in the c:hain of title to the property hereby
conveyed which have not expired by'limitation oftim.e contained
therein 'or have not otherwise .becomeineffective.
Pursuant to virqiniaCode Section 15.2-1803, RObert W. Tucker,
Jr., County Executive, as evidenced by his signature hereto,
accepts this deed on behalf of Albemarle County.
'WITNESSth~fol.lowing signature and seal:
Approvedastof or!l1:
<........~ ,'.'~L .
~unt~ttorney
K]:;MCQ, L.C. ...' < '. . ... ..'
BY: ~J~~4
E. Grant Cosner
rating Manager
(SEAL)
STATE OF VIRGINIA AT LARGE
CITY' OF' CHARLOTTESVILLE, to-wit:
7l.t~oin; ig~o,a~~n~~l~~~~~ ~.~~~~~,m~p;tai:in~~ana~~~ .~~
KIMCO,.L.C., on behalf, of said limited liability company.
My commission expires:
AuglJ.st 31, 2003.
~~J~!3-, V~
&ota~i> Pubii~
STATE OF VIRGINIA AT LARGE
~COUNTY OF tlIJH/JYJ~
, to-wit:
The foregoing was acknowledged before me thiscl/ ~ day of
December, 2000, by Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive.
My commission expires: June 30, 2001
~v;5. .' ..~
No ary.'publiC~'
..'
. I
-, ';;.. -:!
CONTRACT OF PURCHASE
THIS CONTRACT OF PURCHASE made and entered into this Jt.tlL day of
November
, 2000 between KIMCO, L.C., a Virginia limited liability company (the
"Seller"), and the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA (the "Purchaser").
1. REAL PROPERTY: Purchaser agrees to buy and Seller agrees to sell the land and all
improvements thereon and appurtenances thereto (the "Property"), situated on State Route 20 in
Albemarle County, Virginia, shown on Tax Map 91 as Parcels 8B, 10, and 11, containing 31.91
acres.
2. PURCHASE PRICE: The purchase prIce is ONE MILLION SIX HUNDRED
THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($1,600,000.00), payable as follows:
a. $1,198,500.00 payable by cashier's check to Seller at Closing; and
b. $ 401,500.00 payable by charitable contribution to the County of Albemarle.
3. SETTLEMENT AND POSSESSION: Settlement shall be made at the offices of
McClure, Callaghan & Atkins on or before December 31, 2000, or as soon thereafter as the parties
may be able to close, unless the parties mutually agree to a different settlement date.
4. EXPENSES AND PRORATIONS: Seller agrees to pay the expense of preparing the
deed, lease agreement(s), certificates for non~foreign status, Form 1099-B, recordation tax applicable
to grantors, and any attorney, accountant or financial advisor fees incurred by Seller. Except as
otherwise agreed herein, all other expenses incurred by Purchaser in connection with this purchase,
including, without limitation, title examination, appraisal, survey costs, recording costs, fees of
Purchaser's attorney, shall be borne by Purchaser. All taxes shall be prorated as of settlement.
5. APPRAISAL: Purchaser herein acknowledges that it arranged, accepted, and paid for
the appraisal report by Pape and Company, Inc., dated July 24, 2000.
.., ., .....
....
SELLER:
KIMCO, L.C.
By: {)~anf ~
E. Grant Cosner
Operating Manager
Approved as to form:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
County Executive
PURCHASER:
~~
orney's Office
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF ()1~o-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged this 1 day of ~~ , 2000 by
E. Grant Cosner, Operating Manager of KIMCO, L.C., a Virginia LimIted Liability Company,
Seller.
My Commission Expires:
/9.. - 31- dOt) /
COMMONWEALTH~
GI=fY/COUNTY OF (/ to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged this tJ<IA day of 'fI (jll~) , 2000 by
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive of the County of Albemarle, Virgirlta, Purchaser.
My Commission Expires:9M1J1/ ~IJ, ,f((}(J) , ,
4/-tJ/JtV 4. ~
Notary Public
:....,.. ..
5
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Members, Board of SUperviSo.~ rs\/l .
Ella Washington Carey, CMC~
Reading List for November 8, 2000
November 2, 2000
August 9, 2000
September 6,2000
September 20, 2000
lewc
Mr. Dorrier
Pages 11 ~ end ~ Mr, Bowerman
MEMORANDUM
Pages I - 12 (Item # 10) - Mr. Dorrier
.
-
+
~
IAI
~
o
N
aj
~
i!'
'.
~
0>
~
..;
.~
E
<<
'"
13
z
'"
g
::;
~
l~
~
N
N
o
~
'"
:l;
'"
:1J
_I
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
d>I~f'-,
,~ ~~., ~~
f";6i J
'~"'ii!~-I
~#
o
:i;
'"
'"
0,
r;'
OFFICIAL RECf:?T
ALBEMARLE CIRCUlI COURT
DED RECEIPT
DATE: 12/22/00 TIME: 09:29:20 ACCOUNT: 003CLR00001b004 RECEIPT: 00000024033
CASHIER: PXM REG: ABOI TYPE: DES PAYMENT: FULL PAYMENT
INSTRUMENT : 000016004 BOOK: PASE: RECORDED: 12/22/00 AT 09:27
GRANTOR NAME: KH1CD LC EX: ~ LDCALITY: CD
r.RMjTl:'E 'j^..... . rO!1"T'1 OF "If RJ:'l'^Q'''' \)" EV' " PJ:'Qr'.l!T, 1 "'l~
1..11 Mr I.... I MrlC . ... ufi i M....._,;HI1L~1. Mr.. :, ,...1,........1. ..l)v;'
AND ADDRESS : 401 MCINTIRE ROAD CHARLDTiESYILLE. ','A
RECEIVED DF: COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE 'J;rE OF DEED: 11/10/00
CHECK: $4,817.0l) CASH: $1.00 .
DESCRIFTIDN 1; 32.85 ACRES PAGES: 0
2: NAMES: 0
CDNSIDERATIDN: 1:000,000.00 ASSUME/VAL: .00 nAP:
CODE DESCRIPTlOtl PAID CODE DESCR1r'TlDN PAID
301 DEEDS ! b. 00 145 V5LF 1.00
039 DEEDS AND CONTRACTS 2.400.00 038 DEEDS OF CONVEYANCE 800.00
?I~ CDUNTY GRANTEE TAX . 800,00 212 TR;NSF~R FEES 1.00
220 GRANTOR TAX 800,00
TE~JDERED ;
,iMDUNT PA!D~
CHAtJGE riMT
CLERK OF COURT: SHELBY J. ~MRSHALL
4~81S10C
~',S18.00
. f,,""
I'"
DC, 18 IS:OOI
...L
I
n
L.....l
';'1
-
1-
Prepared by McClure, Callaghan & Atkins
Tax Map 9~, Parcels BB, ~o and ~~
THIS DEED dated this loth day of November, 2000, by and
between KIMCO, L.C., a virginia limited liability company, the
Grantor, and the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA, the Grantee,
whose address is: 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902;
WIT N E SSE T H :
THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of TEN DOLLARS
($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby GRANT,
BARGAIN, SELL and CONVEY with GENERAL WARRANTY and ENGLISH
COVENANTS OF TITLE unto Grantee all those parcels of real estate
situated on State Route 620 in the County of Albemarle, Virginia,
containing 32.85 acres, more or. less, being Parcels 8B, 10 and'll
on the Albemarle county Tax Map 91, and shown on plat of Thomas B.
Lincoln Land Surveyor, Inc. dated December 19, 2000, attached
hereto and made a part hereof (the "Plat"); being portions of
property conveyed to the Grantor herein by deed of E. Grant Cosner
and Barbara H. Cosner, husband and wife, dated December 16, 1992,
recorded in said Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1280, page 603.
This conveyance is subj ect to an easement for ingress and
egress over the existing old road, identified on the Plat as the
"old road bed".
Nei ther party hereto shall be responsible for
maintenance of the old road except that each party shall be
responsible for the repair of any damage caused by its own use.
This conveyance is further made subject to all other
easements, restrictions, reservations and conditions contained in
duly recorded deeds, plats and other instruments constituting
constructive notice in the chain of title to the property hereby
conveyed which have not expired by limitation of time contained
therein or have not otherwise become ineffective.
Pursuant to Virginia Code section 15.2-1803, Robert W. Tucker,
Jr., County Executive, as evidenced by his signature hereto,
accepts this deed on behalf of Albemarle County.
WITNESS the following signature and seal:
Approved as to form:
-2 /}f./ L
~unt~ttorney
KIMCO, L.C.
BY: ~ JJvthif t~uJ
E. Grant Cosner
rating Manager
( SEAL)
STATE OF VIRGINIA AT LARGE
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, to-wit:
~ . ~ . The I f?regoing was acknowledged before me this .;:2 / day of
~~ , 2000, by E. Grant Cosner, Operating Manager of
KIMCO,.L.C., on behalf of said limited liability company.
My commission expires:
August 31, 2003.
~1l,V~
Notar Public
STATE OF VIRGINIA AT LARGE
~COUNTY OF atlH/lYI~
, to-wit:
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this ell ~ day of
December, 2000, by Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive.
My commission expires: June 30, 2001
fflfd:mf/~. ~
No ary Public