The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995-08-16 FIN A L 7:00 P.M. August 16, 1995, Regular Meeting AUDITORIUM, County Office Building 1) Call to Order. 2) Pledge of Allegiance. 3) Moment of Silence. 4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. 5) Consent Agenda (on next sheet) . 6) Public Hearing: To present information and to receive public comments and questions on the possible reversion of the City of Charlottes- ville to town status. 7) Approval of Minutes: June 2, 1993; January 11 and June 14, 1995. 8) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. 8a) Executive Session: Legal Matters. 8b) Certify Executive Session. 9) Adjourn. CON S E N T AGENDA FOR APPROVAL: 5.1 Resolution approving the issuance of Industrial Development Authority revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 to assist in the financing of the University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation's acquisi- tion, construction and equipping of a facility to be leased to the University of Virginia for education and research purposes. 5.2 Resolution approving the issuance of Industrial Development Authority revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 to assist in financ- ing the acquisition, construction, renovation and equipment projects of the University of Virginia Health Services Foundation. 5.3 Resolution approving the issuance of Industrial Development Authority revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $20,000,000 to assist in the financing of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge's acquisition, construction and equipping of expansions to its facility for the resi- dence and care of the aged. 5.4 Authorize County Executive to execute Police Mutual Aid Agreement. 5.5 Statements of Expenses for the Department of Finance, Sheriff, Common- wealth's Attorney, Regional Jail and Clerk, Circuit Court, for the month of July, 1995. FOR INFORMATION: 5.6 Summary of Health Insurance usage for Albemarle County and Schools for April 1, 1994 through March 31, 1995. 5.7 1994-95 Child Assault Prevention (CAP) Project Annual Report for Albe- marle County Public Schools. '41/1 .." " David P. Bowerman Charlottesvîl1e COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller MEMORANDUM TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. , County Executive FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk ~ DATE: August 17, 1995 SUBJECT: Board Actions of August 16, 1995 The following is a list of actions taken by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on August 16, 1995. Agenda Item NO.1. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by the Chairman, Mr. Perkins. Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. There were none. Agenda Item No. 5.1. Resolution approving the issuance of Industrial Development Authority revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 to assist in the financing of the University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation's acquisition, construction and equipping of a facility to be leased to the University of Virginia for education and research purposes. Adopted the attached resolution. Agenda Item No. 5.2. Resolution approving the issuance of Industrial Development Authority revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 to assist in financing the acquisition, construction, renovation and equipment projects of the University of Virginia Health Services Foundation. Adopted the attached resolution. Agenda Item No. 5.3. Resolution approving the issuance of Industrial Development Authority revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $20,000,000 to assist in the financing of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge's acquisi- tion, construction and equipping of expansions to its facility for the resi- dence and care of the aged. Adopted the attached resolution. Agenda Item No. 5.4. Authorize County Executive to execute Police Mutual Aid Agreement. Approved the attached agreement. * Printed on recycled paper ~ ,. . . To: Date: Page: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. August 17, 1995 2 Agenda Item No.6. Public Hearing: To present information and to re- ceive public comments and questions on the possible reversion of the City of Charlottesville to town status. Public Hearing held. Agenda Item No.8. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. Mr. Bowerman requested that the sound system be fixed in the auditorium to where people can hear, or to investigate the need for another system. Agenda Item No. 8a. Executive Session: Legal Matters. At 9:25 p.m., a motion was offered by Mr. Martin, seconded by Mrs. Thomas, to go into Execu- tive Session pursuant to Section 2.1-344(A) of the Code of Virginia under subsection (7) to consult with legal counsel and staff regarding specific legal matters concerning reversion. Agenda Item No. 8b. Certify Executive Session. Certified. The meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m. to September 5, 1995, at 9:00 a.m. EWC/tpf Attachments (4) cc: Richard E. Huff Larry Davis File ,. David P. Bowerman Chadottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 / Charles S Martin R ¡vanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkms White Hal! Forrest R. Marshall, Jr Scoltsville Sally H. Thomas Sðmuel Miller August 17, 1995 McQuire Woods , Battle & Boothe Attention: David L. Richardson One James Center 901 East Cary Street Richmond, VA 23219-4030 Dear Mr. Richardson: At its meeting on August 16, 1995, the Board of County Supervisors adopted the attached Resolutions for revenue bond issues for the University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation, Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge and the Health Services Foundation. If there are any questions, please call me for assistance. SccerelY, EÇ(a~r~ Clerk EWCjtpf * Printed on recycled paper .. . I · ,. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority"), has considered the application of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge (",WCBR") requesting the issuance of ¿he Authority's revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $20,000,000 ("Bonds") to assist in (i) financing WCBR's acquisition, construction and equipping of expansions to its facility for the residence and care of the aged ("Facility") located at 250 Pantops Mountain Road in Albemarle County, Virginia, (ii) refunding the outstanding principal amount of the Authority's $25,055,000 Residential Care Facility First Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge), Series 1989, issued on February 14, 1989 to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Facility; (iii) refunding the outstanding principal amount of the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Orange, Virginia's $1,300,000 Residential Care Facility Revenue Bond (Westminster- Canterbury of the Blue Ridge Project), Series 1993, issued on December 30, 1993 to finance an addition to the west wing of the Facility and (iv) financing various reserve funds and costs of issuance relating to the proposed issuance of bonds, and has held a public hearing on August 7, 1995; WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of private activity bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("County"); the Facility is located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the County; WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact Statement have been filed with the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the benefit of WCBR, as required by Section 147(f) ;... of the Code and Section 15.1-1378.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia Code") to permit the Authority to assist in the financing. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the creditworthiness of the Facility or WCBR. 3. This resolution shall remain in effect for a pe~iod of one year from the date of its adoption. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia this I&~ day of August, 1995. isors of le, Virginia [SEAL] .! ~ , RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority") has considered the application of University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation ("Foundation") requesting tJie issuance of the Authority's 'revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 ("Bonds") to assist in financing the Foundation's acquisition, construction and equipping of a facility to be leased to the University of Virginia for education and research purposes ("Facility") and has held a public hearing on August 7, 1995; WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of private activity bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("County") i the Facility is located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the County; WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact Statement have been filed with the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the benefit of the Foundation, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.1-1378.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia Code") to permit the Authority to assist in the financing. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the creditworthiness of the Facility or the Foundation. 3. This resolution shall remain in effect for a period of one year from the date of its adoption. .. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia this I~ day of August, 1995. / [SEAL] -2- .. . RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority") has considered the application of The University of Virginia Health Services ' Foundation ("Foundation") requesting the issuance of the Authority's revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 ("Bonds") to assist in (i) financing various acquisition, construction, renovation and equipment projects of the Foundation as more particularly described in the notice published in connection with the public hearing described below and (ii) refunding the outstanding principal amount of the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Charlottesville, Virginia's $3,300,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bond (University of Virginia Health Services Foundation), issued on January 20, 1984 to finance the acquisition, equipping and construction of the Virginia Ambulatory Surgery Center, all of the foregoing hereafter referred to as the "Project," and has held a public hearing on August 7, 1995; WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of private activity bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("County"); a portion of the Project is located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the County; WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the Bondsi and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact Statement have been filed with the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the benefit of Foundation, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.1-1378.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia Codell) to permit the Authority to assist in the financing. ..4. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Foundation. 3. This resolution shall remain in effect for a period of one year from the date of its adoption. 4. adoption. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its I Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia this I&~ day of August, 1995. Cler , Board of Superviso the County of Albemarle, of rginia [SEAL] -2- 1 David P. Bo"",rman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 (804) 296-5843 I FAX (804) 972·4060 Charles S. Martin R ¡vanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. ScottsviJle Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Mr. Mark Trank, Deputy County Attorney FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk ~ DATE: August 17, 1995 SUBJECT: Police Mutual Aid Agreement At its meeting on August 16, 1995, the Board of Supervisors authorized the County Executive to execute the Police Mutual Aid Agreement. Attached are three copies of the Agreement which must be signed by the Charlottesville's City Manager and the Chief Administration Officer of The Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia. Once all signatures have been obtained, please forward one copy of this Agreement to the Clerk's office. If there are any questions, please call me for assistance. EWC/tpf cc: John F. Miller Rick Huff * Printed on recycled paper POLICE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 1995 by and among the CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE (the "City"), the COUNTY ¡ OF ALBEMARLE (t he " Coun t y" ) ,. and THE RECTOR AND VI S ITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA (the "University"). WHEREAS, Va. Code §§ 15.1-131 and 15.1-159.7 authorize the governing bodies of the City, County and University to enter into reciprocal agreements for mutual aid for emergency purposes, for maintenance of peace and good order and for cooperation in the furnishing of police services; WHEREAS, the City, County and the University have determined that the provision of police aid across jurisdictional lines will increase their ability to respond to law enforcement emergencies involving immediate threats to life or public safety in their respective jurisdictions, and will assist them in the preservation of public safety and welfare of the entire area; WHEREAS, it is deemed to be mutually beneficial to the parties hereto to enter into an agreement concerning mutual aid and cooperation with regard to law enforcement; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire that the terms and conditions of this Police Mutual Aid Agreement (the "Agreement") be established; NOW THEREFORE; WIT N E SSE T H: That for and in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived from this Agreement, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows: 1. Each party will endeavor to provide police support to the jurisdictions which are parties to this Agreement within the capabilities available at the time the request for such support is made and within the terms of this Agreement. 2. Requests for assi?tance pursuant to conditions of this Agreement shall be made by the the t e rr(lS and requesting jurisdiction's Administrative City Manager, County Executive or Officer, whichever is applicable, or Chief their respective designee(s). 3. The requesting jurisdiction shall be responsible for designating a radio communications system for use by the requested jurisdiction. 4. The personnel of the requested jurisdiction shall render such assistance under the direction of the Chief of Police or other principal law enforcement officer of the requesting jurisdiction. 5. Law enforcement support provided pursuant to this Agreement shall include, but not be limited to, the following resources: uniformed officers, canine officers, forensic support, plainclothes officers, special operations personnel and related equipment. 6. Subj ect to the terms of this Agreement, and without limiting in any way the other circumstances or conditions in which mutual aid may be requested and provided under this Agreement, the parties hereto agree to provide assistance to the requesting jurisdiction in situations requiring the mass processing of 2 arrestees and transportation of arrestees. The parties to this Agreement further agree to assist the requesting jurisdiction with security and operation of temporary detention facilities. 7. The parties to this Agreement specifically agree and authorize the continuation, and if necessary, expansi~n, of I existing cooperative law enforcement arrangements dealing with (a) the Joint Narcotics Investigative Uniti (b) the Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA") Federal Task Forcei and (c) joint multi- agency K-9 coverage. 8. Nothing contained In this Agreement should in any manner be construed to compel any of the parties hereto to respond to a request for police support when the police personnel of the jurisdiction to whom the request is made are, in the opinion of the requested jurisdiction, needed or are being used within the boundaries of that jurisdiction, nor shall any such request compel the requested jurisdiction to continue to provide police support to another jurisdiction when its police personnel or equipment, in the opinion of the requested jurisdiction, are needed for other duties within the boundaries of its own jurisdiction. 9. The responsibility for investigation and subsequent actions concerning any criminal offense shall remain with the police agency of the requesting jurisdiction where the offense occurred. Entering police personnel shall promptly notify the police agency of the entered jurisdiction upon discovery of a crime in the requesting jurisdiction where the offense occurred. 3 10. Officers acting pursuant to this Agreement shall be granted authority to enforce the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and to perform the other duties of a law enforcement officeri such authority shall be in conformance with Va. Code §§ 15.1-131, 15.1-131.3, 15.1-131.5, and 15.1-159.7 as may be applicable; however, police officers of any jurisdiction who might be casually present in any other jurisdiction shall have power to apprehend and make arrests only in such instances wherein an apparent, immediate threat to public safety precludes the option of deferring action to the local police agency. 11. When performing police duties in a requesting jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, each police officer, agent, and other employee of the parties hereto shall have the same police powers, rights and privileges, including the authority to make arrests, as the officers, agents or employees have in the jurisdiction where they were appointed. 12. Pursuant to Va. Code § 15.1-131, the services performed and expenditures made under this Agreement shall be deemed to be for public and governmental purposes and all immunities afforded to the requested jurisdiction when acting within its boundaries shall extend to its participation in rendering assistance outside its boundaries to a requesting jurisdiction. For the purposes of this Agreement, the requested jurisdiction that responds to a request for assistance is rendering aid once it has entered the jurisdictional boundaries of the requesting jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions herein. 4 13. All immunities from liability, exemptions from laws, ordinances and regulations, pension, relief, disability, worker's compensation, life and health insurance, and other benefits enjoyed by police officers, agents and other employees of each party shall extend to the services they perform under this Agreement outside their respective jurisdictions. Each party agrees that the provision of these benefits shall remain the responsibility of the primary employing jurisdiction. 14. To the extent permitted by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, each party hereto, in activities involving the rendering of assistance to a requesting jurisdiction pursuant to this Agreement, shall (i) waive any and all claims against all other parties to this Agreement which may arise out of such parties' activities outside their respective jurisdictions, and (ii) be responsible for the acts or omissions of its police officers, agents and other employees causing harm to persons not a party to this Agreement. Nothing herein shall be deemed as an express or implied walver of the sovereign immunity of the Commonwealth of Virginia. 15. The parties to this Agreement shall not be liable to each other for reimbursement for inj uries to personnel or damage to equipment incurred when going to or returning from another jurisdiction. Neither shall the parties hereto be liable to each other for any other costs associated with, or arising out of, the rendering of assistance pursuant to this Agreement, unless the 5 · .. .> other for any other costs associated with, or arising out of, the rendering of assistance pursuant to this Agreement, unless the parties expressly agree otherwise in advance of the provision of assistance under this Agreement. 16. This Agreement sets/forth the complete agreement r~lating to the provision of mutual police services among the parties hereto, and supersedes all previous agreements, whether written or oral, relating to such services. 17. Any of the parties hereto may withdraw from this Agreement by giving ninety (90) days written notice to that effect to the other parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective City Manager, County Executive, and chief administrative officer, the official seal of each city and county affixed hereto and attested by their respective city and county clerks, and university official, and indicating thereafter the resolution authorizing the execution. 6 " .. . ATTEST: CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE By: City Clerk By: City Manager Resolution No. Adopted on / ATTEST: By: Adopted: August 16, 1995 ATTEST: THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA By: By: Chief Administrative Officer Resolution No. Adopted on 7 , COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE ~ffi{/6.ts: _~) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Distributed 10 Board: <:jJ fr!ÆJtf Agfmd. Iteifl No _~ AGENDA TITLE: Resolution for Industrial Development Bond Approval AGENDA DATE: August 16,1995 ITEM BER: , '\ Cf5öfJ'If:J 5/-SV INFORMATION: ACfION: SUBJECf/PROPOSALIREOUEST: Approval is sought for three separate IDA bond issues for the University Real Estate Foundation, Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge, and Health Services Foundation. CONSENT AGENDA: ACfION: X INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes STAFF CONT ACf(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Davis REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended provides that the governmental unit, having jurisdiction over the issuer of private activity bonds and over the area in which the facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds. There are three separate requests which have been approved by the Albemarle County Industrial Development Authority and are now before the Board. Approval of the issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds by the Industrial Development Authority carries it with no legal or fmancial obligation on Albemarle County in case of default by the applicant. These bonds, which are sold by a bank at less than the prime lending rate, cany with them a tax. advantage to the issuing bank that allows the lower than market interest rateto be offered. These bonds can be issued by any Industrial Development Authority in the state which would then not require any local approval from our County. Staff has attempted to separate the issue of whether or not these projects are subject to property taxation from the pure fmancing question of whether or not the County should approve of this issuance by the Industrial Development Authority. For the record, the Westminster-Canterbury project will be subject to property taxation, the University Real Estate Foundation and the Health Services Foundation projects will not. The fIrst application is from Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge requesting the issuance of the Authority's revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $20 million to assist in an expansion to its facility for the residents and care of the aged located at Pantops Mountain Road. The second application is from University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation requesting the issuance of the Authority's revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8 million to assist in financing a facility to be leased to the University of Virginia for education and research pwposes on the Fontaine A venue property. This facility, separate from the one before the Board on August 9th for a land use decision, is intended to house the Virginia Neurological Institute. This facility will be doing research and serving as a training center for neurological issues related to the health care industry. The third application is from the Virginia Health Services Foundation requesting the issuance of the Authority's revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8 million to assist in fInancing various projects to be located in Albemarle, Charlottesville, Nelson, Fluvanna, Louisa, and the Town of Orange, Additionally, a re-financing of a 1984 issue for the Virginia Ambulatory Surgery Center is also included in this application, J AGENDA TITLE: Resolution for Industrial Development Bond Approval August 16, 1995 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff is currently developing a work session for the Board to discuss the various property tax exemption issue surrounding the University and its various foundations. Given the legitimacy of these requests for tax exempt fmancing which meet the criteria under the Federal code, staff recommends that the Board approve each of the individual resolutions attached in separate motions. 95.130 FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR PROPOSED BOND FINANCING Date: August 7, 1995 To the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia Applicant: Facility: Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge Residential Care Facility 1. 2. 4. Maximum amount of financing sought $20,000,000 Estimated taxable value of the facility's real property to be constructed in the municipality $14,950,400 3 . Estimated real property tax per year using present tax rates 73,180 $ Estimated personal property tax per year using present tax rates $ 25,375 5 . Estimated merchants' capital tax per year using present tax rates 15,000 $ 6 . Estimated dollar value per year of goods and services that will be purchased locally $ 2,200,000 7. Estimated number of regular employees on year round basis 110 8 . Average annual salary per employee 16,744 $ airman, Authority Virginia FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR PROPOSED BOND FINANCING Date: August 7, 1995 To the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia Applicant: University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation 1. 2. Maximum amount of financing sought $8,000,000 Estimated taxable value of the facility's real property to be constructed in the municipality $ o 3. Estimated real property tax per year using present tax rates o $ 4. Estimated personal property tax per year using present tax rates o $ 5. Estimated merchants' capital tax per year using present tax rates o $ 6 . Estimated dollar value per year of goods and services that will be purchased locally $500 - 800,000 7. Estimated number of regular employees on year round basis 225 8 . Average annual salary per employee 36,000 $ Chairman, Authority Virginia Development e County, fo'l.~'CAT, TMPACT r:1'ATF.MENT FOR PROPOSED BOND FINANCING LJèl.l~: AU:Juljl 7, 1,)\")S To l he Board <) r Sllp~1-vi B01·S 0f Alhemarle County, Virginia ~ppJ. J Ci:Hll. : Tilt-! UlllV~;L::ÜLy uL Vl1.l:Jlu.L.1:1 HI;d.lLb. ::!o:::'.!.V-LL.O:¡;' Foundation ¡ . Mr.¡X1 mum <lmount of fimmcinq sought ~;A/OOO,OOO* 2. EstimAtRd taxable V<lluc of the facility's real property Lo be cOII$l..rllc:t.p.d in the TIIIJnic1pa11r.y ~ìl,444fOOO** 3. ß~lirnHLed real property t~x per year uoinq present tax rales $ 0** $ 0** ~~~ n** 4. E~tim~ted peroonal properly lax per year usin~.J pn~éif:!I1l Letx .ca t.ee 5. Eotimated merchants' cèI.µlld.l L~x pRY ~1":''::'''''- ", CI ; ,¡ cr r,",-I\ c"'" 'M ... f- .""" v ,-:"\ t' ~ ~ ¡; . RRtim~tRd dollar v<llue per year of gooda ùnd aerVlceo th~t will bf:! PIH·ch';:¡RP.dI0C;:¡J.l.y $ ¿~o,OOO¡'·.I: 7. Estimated number ot regular cmployee~ on year round basis 18+'" 8 . Averaqe annual salary per ,=mployee t~. "~)' ^- ....t::~·mi::HlI Tndust ri al ./ Authority of Alb@m¡,{I.' vÜ'Uin1i:t .:- .... 36,500*+ *Approxim<.\tr=ly ~~2, SOO, 000 1.<"> bA ,:'4pplìr::d ~n Albemarle County. ··...Tnfnrmiir;nn relntp.s only to facilitiec ~n ^lbem<;lrl~ CounLy. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority"), has considered the application of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge (II.WCBR") requesting the issuance of ¿he Authority's revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $20,000,000 ("Bonds") to assist in (i) financing WCBR's acquisition, construction and equipping of expansions to its facility for the residence and care of the aged ("Facility") located at 250 Pantops Mountain Road in Albemarle County, Virginia, (ii) refunding the outstanding principal amount of the Authority's $25,055,000 Residential Care Facility First Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge), Series 1989, issued on February 14, 1989 to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Facility; (iii) refunding the outstanding principal amount of the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Orange, Virginia's $1,300,000 Residential Care Facility Revenue Bond (Westminster- Canterbury of the Blue Ridge Project), Series 1993, issued on December 30, 1993 to finance an addition to the west wing of the Facility and (iv) financing various reserve funds and costs of issuance relating to the proposed issuance of bonds, and has held a public hearing on August 7, 1995; WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Codell), provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of private activity bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bondsi WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("County"); the Facility is located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia (IIBoard") constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the County; WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact Statement have been filed with the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the benefit of WCBR, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.1-1378.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia Code") to permit the Authority to assist in the financing. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the creditworthiness of the Facility or WCBR. 3. This resolution shall remain in effect for a pe~iod of one year from the date of its adoption. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia this /&~ day of August, 1995. isors of le, Virginia [SEAL ] RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority") has considered the application of University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation ("Foundation") requesting tJie issuance of the Authority's 'revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 ("Bonds") to assist in financing the Foundation's acquisition, construction and equipping of a facility to be leased to the University of Virginia for education and research purposes ("Facility") and has held a public hearing on August 7, 1995; WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of private activity bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("County"); the Facility is located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the County; WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact Statement have been filed with the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the benefit of the Foundation, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.1-1378.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia Code") to permit the Authority to assist in the financing. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the creditworthiness of the Facility or the Foundation. 3. This resolution shall remain in effect for a period of one year from the date of its adoption. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia this /~ day of August, 1995. / [SEAL] -2- RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority") has considered the application of The University of Virginia Health Services ' Foundation ("Foundation") requesting the issuance of the Authority's revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 ("Bonds") to assist in (i) financing various acquisition, construction, renovation and equipment projects of the Foundation as more particularly described in the notice published in connection with the public hearing described below and (ii) refunding the outstanding principal amount of the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Charlottesville, Virginia's $3,300,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bond (University of Virginia Health Services Foundation), issued on January 20, 1984 to finance the acquisition, equipping and construction of the Virginia Ambulatory Surgery Center, all of the foregoing hereafter referred to as the "Project," and has held a public hearing on August 7, 1995i WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of private activity bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bondsi WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("County") i a portion of the Project is located in the County and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the CountYi WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact Statement have been filed with the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the benefit of Foundation, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.1-1378.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia Code") to permit the Authority to assist in the financing. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the creditworthiness of the Project or the Foundation. 3. This resolution shall remain in effect for a period of one year from the date of its adoption. 4. adoption. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its I Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia this I&~ day of August, 1995. of rginia [SEAL] -2- August 7, 1995 Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle, Virginia Charlottesville, Virginia Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia Proposed Financing for Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge ("WCBRII) has requested that the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia (IIAuthority"), assist WCBR in (i) financing the acquisition, construction and equipping of expansions to WCBR'S facility for the residence and care of the aged, (ii) refunding certain outstanding indebtedness of WCBR and (iii) financing various reserve funds and costs of issuance, by the issuance of its revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $20,000,000 (IIBondsll) . As set forth in the resolution of the Authority attached hereto ("Resolution"), the Authority has agreed to issue its Bonds as requested. The Authority has conducted a public hearing on the proposed financing and has recommended that you approve the issuance of the Bonds as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Section 15.1- 1378.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. Attached hereto is (1) a certificate evidencing the conduct of the public hearing and the action taken by the Authority, (2) the Fiscal Impact Statement required pursuant to Virginia Code Section 15.1-1378.2, and (3) the form of resolution suggested by counsel to evidence your approval. sec~~~Y, ~~r'bevelopment Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia - CERTIFICATE The undersigned Secretary of the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority") certifies as follows: 1. A meeting of the Authority was duly called and held on August 7, 1995, at 4:00 o'clock p.m. in Meeting Room 235 (Totier Room) on the second floor of the County Office Building at 401 McIntire Road, in Charlottesville, Virginia, pursuant to proper notice given to each Director of the Authority before such meeting. The meeting was open to the public. The time of the meeting and the place at which the meeting was held provided a reasonable opportunity for persons of differing views to appear and be heard. 2. The Chairman announced the commencement of a public hearing on the application of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge and that a notice of the hearing was published once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Notice"), with the second publication appearing not less than six days nor more than twenty-one days prior to the hearing date. A copy of the Notice has been filed with the minutes of the Authority and is attached as Exhibit A. 3. A summary of the statements made at the public hearing is attached as Exhibit B. 4. Attached as Exhibit C is a true, correct and complete copy of a resolution ("Resolution") adopted at such meeting of the Authority by a majority of the Directors present at such - meeting. The Resolution constitutes all formal action taken by the Authority at such meeting relating to matters referred to in the Resolution. The Resolution has not been repealed, revoked, rescinded or amended and is in full force and effect on this date. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Authority, this 7th day of August, 1995. Ii Secret Authority Virginia (SEAL) Exhibits: A - Copy of Certified Notice B - Summary of Statements C - Inducement Resolution Q1,12,c pnil~ fr,t)11r,cßß CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION CITY/COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA TO: \n L(l. ~~ ,,_ Î r'\ \\_X:nJ ?"-¡ Charlottesville, Virginia 22906 I,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE WAS PUBLISHED " THE DAILY PROGRESS ", A NEWSPAPER IN CI~OTTESVILLE, DATEDC'\~ VIRGINIA, AND APPEARED IN THE ISSUE(S) ~'\-- ~\ /199~. EXHIBIT A Telephone: 804/978-720 NOTICE OF PUBlIC HEARING 0BONN PROPOSED REVENUE D FINANCING BY IN· DUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY. VIRGINIA Nodce is hereby given that the Induatrial Development Autho,¡. ty 01 Albemarle County. Virginia I"Authority"} will hold a public hee.n~ on the application 01 Westmínster-Canterbury 01 !he !3Iue Ridge ("WCBRj raquest. Ing the AuthOrity to issue up to $20.000,000 01 its revenue bo~ to assist WCBR in (I) ac- q~U'~ conaruc:ting and aquip- ping Improvements, including an approximately 12,500 square foot addition, 10 WCBR's facility for !he residence and care olthe o aged ("Facility") located at 250 - Pantops Mountain Road in the County 01 Albemarle, Virginla, to a.ccommodate additional dining, kitchen, office and acdvities areas and to provide a covered entrance to the Facility, (ii) re- funding the outslanding princi- pal amount 01 !he Authority's $25.055,000 Residential Care Facility First Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Westminster. Canterbury of the Blue Ridge) Series 1989, issued on 'Fe: brU8l)' 14, 1989 10 finance the acq~rs~tlon. conatruc:tion and aqUlpplng of !he Facility; (ii~ re- funding the oUlSlanding pnnci- pal amount of the Industrial De- ve/opment Authority 01 the County 01 Orange, Virginia's $1.300,000 Residential Care F~iJjty Revenue Bond (West. m.'nster-C~nterbury of the Blue Ridge PrOJect). series 1993, is. sued on December 30, 1993 to fi~ an addition to the west w'ng. of the. Facility and (iv) fi. nanong vanous reserve funds and costs 01 Issuance relating to ~~Oposed issuance of ihe The ÎISu8nce of revenue bonds as r~uested by WCBR wiD not constnute a debt or pladQe of . the fajth and credit of the Com- monwealth of Virginia or the County. of Albemarle, Virginia, and Melther the faith and credit nor the faXing power of the C0lTmOr!Weaflh 01 Virginia or a':')' political subdivision thereof will be pedged 10 the payment 01 such bonds. '. DAY OF ~.199 .;:. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS \ ~Ov~ \"~"'tJ CAROL A. MAWYER/ CREDI r MANAGER/NOTARY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: SEPT. 30, 1996 PUBLISHING FEE: $ \ ~ ~ _(:, '-\ . - The pu~ hearing. which may be COnllnued or adjoumed, will be held at 4:00 dock p.m. on Auguat 7. 1995, before the Au- tho~ty. in Meeting Room 235 (Toiler Room) on the 2nd Floor of the County Office Building 4.01 Mc~d~e Road. Charlottes: VlD., V..glnta. Any l«lICIn inter. ested in the issuance of the bonds or the location or nab/re ollhe proposed project may ap- ~ at the hearing and plesent his or her views. A copy of WCBR's aøølication is on file ' and IS open lor inspec:tion at the Authoritv's office al the County Office building, 401 Mcintire Road. C~rlotlesvilte, Virginia 22901 dunng business hours, Industrial Development ~thori- ty of Albemarle County. Virginia EXHIBIT B TO CERTIFICATE Summary of Statements Representatives of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge appeared before the Authority to explain the proposed project and plan of financing. No one appeared in opposition to the bond issue. EXHIBIT C RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF UP TO $20,000,000 REVENUE BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING A FACILITY FOR THE RESIDENCE AND CARE OF THE AGED LOCATED IN ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia ("Authority"), is empowered by (a) the Ablemarle County Code to finance facilities for the residence and care of the aged, and (b) the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, Chapter 33, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Act"), to issue its revenue bonds for the purpose of assisting in the acquisition, construction, equipping and refinancing of facilities for the residence or care of the aged in order to provide modern and efficient services to them, in accordance with their special needs; WHEREAS, the Authority has received a request from Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge, a Virginia non-stock corporation ("WCBR"), requesting that the Authority issue its revenue bonds to assist in (i) financing the acquisition, construction and equipping of improvements (II Project ") to WCBR's facility for the residence and care of the aged ("Facility") located at 250 Pantops Mountain Road in the County of Albemarle, Virginia; (ii) refunding the outstanding principal amount of the Authority's $25,055,000 Residential Care Facility First Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge), Series 1989, issued on February 14, 1989 ("Series 1989 Bonds") to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Facility; and (iii) refunding the outstanding principal amount of the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Orange, Virginia's $1,300,000 Residential Care Facility Revenue Bond (Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge Project), Series 1993, issued December 30, 1993 (II Series 1993 Bond") to finance an addition to the west wing of the Facility; WHEREAS, such assistance will benefit the inhabitants of the County of Albemarle, Virginia and the Commonwealth of Virginia, by protecting and promoting their health and welfare and assisting in the provision of modern and efficient medical services; WHEREAS, preliminary plans for the Project and the refunding of the Series 1989 Bonds and the Series 1993 Bond ("Refunding") have been described to the Authority and a public hearing has been held as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, ("Code") and Section 15.1-1378.1 of the Act; WHEREAS, WCBR has represented that the estimated cost of the Refunding and the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project and all necessary reserves and expenses of issue will require an issue of revenue bonds in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $20,000,000; WHEREAS, the bonds are expected to be offered for sale by Wheat, First Securities, Inc., Davenport & Co. of Virginia, Inc. and Scott & Stringfellow, Inc. ("Underwriters") pursuant to a Preliminary Official Statement of the Authority ("Preliminary Official Statement"), the form of which has been provided to the Authority; and WHEREAS, the bonds are expected to be sold to the Underwriters pursuant to the terms of a Bond Purchase Agreement among the Authority, WCBR and the Underwriters ("Bond Purchase Agreement") dated the date of execution and delivery thereof, such bonds being in a maximum principal amount of $20,000,000, bearing interest at a maximum interest rate of 7% and having a final maturity not later than January 1, 2019 ("Bond Termsl') . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. 1. It is hereby found and determined that (a) the Refunding and the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project will be in the public interest and will promote the health and welfare of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the County of Albemarle, Virginia and their citizens and (b) the activities to be conducted at the Facility are facilities for the residence and care of the aged as contemplated by the Albemarle County Code. 2. To induce WCBR to locate the Project in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and particularly in the County of Albemarle, Virginia the Authority hereby agrees to assist WCBR in financing the Refunding and the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project by undertaking the issuance of its revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $20,000,000 upon terms and conditions mutually agreeable to the Authority and WCBR. The bonds will be issued pursuant to documents satisfactory to the Authority. The bonds may be issued in one or more series at one time or from time to time. 3. It having been represented to the Authority that it is necessary to proceed immediately with the acquisition, planning and construction of the Project, the Authority agrees that WCBR may proceed with plans for the Project, enter into contracts for land, construction, materials and equipment for the Project, and take such other steps as it may deem appropriate in connection with the Project; provided, however, that nothing in this resolution shall be deemed to authorize WCBR to obligate the Authority without its consent in each instance to the payment of any moneys or the performance of any acts in connection with the Project. The Authority agrees that WCBR may be reimbursed from the proceeds of the bonds for all expenditures and costs so incurred by it, provided such expenditures and costs are properly reimbursable under the Act and applicable federal laws. 4. At the request of WCBR, the Authority approves Messrs. McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, as Bond Counsel in connection with the issuance of the bonds. 5. All costs and expenses in connection with the Refunding and the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project, including the fees and expenses of Bond Counsel and Authority Counsel, shall be paid by WCBR or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, from the proceeds of the bonds. If for any reason such bonds are not issued, it is understood that all such expenses shall be paid by WCBR and that the Authority shall have no responsibility therefor. 6. In adopting this resolution the Authority intends to take "official action" toward the issuance of the bonds and to evidence its "official intent" to reimburse from the proceeds of the bonds any expenditures paid by WCBR to finance the acquisition, planning and construction of the Project before the issuance of the bonds, all within the meaning of regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to Sections 103 and 141 through 150 and related sections of the Code. 7. The Authority recommends that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, approve the issuance of the bonds. 8. No bonds may be issued pursuant to this resolution until such time as the issuance of the bonds has been approved by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia. 9. The use and distribution by the Underwriters of the Preliminary Official Statement substantially in the form now on file with the Authority are in all respects authorized and approved. For purposes of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Authority hereby deems the Preliminary Official Statement final except for information permitted to be omitted under paragraph (b) (1) of such Rule. 10~ The Chairman or the Vice Chairman of the Authority, either of whom may act, are each authorized to execute and deliver the Bond Purchase Agreement to the other parties thereto and to take such other actions as may be necessary to effect or evidence the sale of the bonds to the Underwriters, so long as the actual terms of the bonds are within the limitations described in the Bond Terms. 11. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. August 7, 1995 Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle, Virginia Charlottesville, Virginia Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia Proposed Financing for University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation ("Foundation") has requested that the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority"), assist the Foundation in financing the acquisition, construction and equipping of a facility to be leased to the University of Virginia for education and research purposes by the issuance of its revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 ("Bonds"). As set forth in the resolution of the Authority attached hereto ("Resolution"), the Authority has agreed to issue its Bonds as requested. The Authority has conducted a public hearing on the proposed financing and has recommended that you approve the issuance of the Bonds as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Section 15.1- 1378.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. Attached hereto is (1) a certificate evidencing the conduct of the public hearing and the action taken by the Authority, (2) the Fiscal Impact Statement required pursuant to Virginia Code Section 15.1-1378.2, and (3) the form of resolution suggested by counsel to evidence your approval. Secr try, Authority of Virginia 1 Development rle County, CERTIFICATE The undersigned Secretary of the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority") certifies as follows: 1. A meeting of the Authority was duly called and held on August 7, 1995, at 4:00 o'clock p.m. in Meeting Room 235 (Totier Room) on the second floor of the County Office Building at 401 McIntire Road, in Charlottesville, Virginia, pursuant to proper notice given to each Director of the Authority before such meeting. The meeting was open to the public. The time of the meeting and the place at which the meeting was held provided a reasonable opportunity for persons of differing views to appear and be heard. 2. The Chairman announced the commencement of a public hearing on the application of University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation and that a notice of the hearing was published once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Notice"), with the second publication appearing not less than six days nor more than twenty-one days prior to the hearing date. A copy of the Notice has been filed with the minutes of the Authority and is attached as Exhibit A. 3. A summary of the statements made at the public hearing is attached as Exhibit B. 4. Attached as Exhibit C is a true, correct and complete copy of a resolution ("Resolution") adopted at such meeting of the Authority by a majority of the Directors present at such meeting. The Resolution constitutes all formal action taken by the Authority at such meeting relating to matters referred to in the Resolution. The Resolution has not been repealed, revoked, rescinded or amended and is in full force and effect on this date. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Authority, this 7th day of August, 1995. Secr Authority Virginia Development e County, (SEAL) Exhibits: A - Copy of Certified Notice B - Summary of Statements C - Inducement Resolution -2- EXHIBIT A ~l~,~ Ä1nil~ fr;(J;gf;tßß Charlottesville. Virginia 22906 Telephone: 804/978-720( CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION CITY/COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA TO: "I r.fJ.'v-Vl..Ji.. \~,rl:Á~ I,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE WAS PUBLISHED IN n THE DAILY PROGRESS ", A NEWSPAPER IN CI~OTTESVILLE, DATED c\ ,.J.. Õ VIRGINIA, AND APPEARED IN THE ISSUE(S) 'd,,\ d.; 3\ /199~ _ GIVEN UNDER MY IlAND THIS \ DAY OF 0:..,",\ ~ .~~ CAROL A. MAWYER/ CREDI AGER/NOTARY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: SEPT. 30, 1996 PUBLISHING FEE: $ \ \ð, ? ú · ~g:t!žw æz wã! <~>:æ~< ~æa:l&wz U ~-'~a ::;o~~<g; ~WUWII..> Q. oo~oo~· ~M-'f;z wa: sa:Õ QQ.o~ou .... zoo;; oZO::J5 ZOa:lO< l~~~~~~~~~GC~~~~._ _ -£~~cw~~~0~8ä~~~~g~0!1~~~ 2~~a.·8ãi:¡::~~!!!~i! I.!!o.ã..-~-c ~as5 _ ." 8&~u> s 2! c ~-.s~ Q. .. :;¡.-.x.- §!;o CC~._ ceo ~ ",-..II>e>ell2!cbll>1;¡tla:lU :lI>c-~..~o~~~æu~>ClCllo ~Q.~œll> 'Qf;!2~:Ëæ~~2~G>5a_II>~~2!o ~C\£, ",,8"õ= .~~0~ £l!bo~O"J!:;¡ë-5J!.!!.c'!!! ~~G>~lI>sc 11><0 O-b Q 8 ~~~~-c ; ~-.: ~£-8 i~ tI&.!i u'g·¡¡;"2'§8..Q~J:! ~&.".g. ~o~CocoCl~1;¡~8~à-..tCl~qll>~òlI>=II>:> "ãllI>~' ~"2-o~CtñClC" o~ :>Jrw£_~ ';:s.e'g o,¡¡; ~ Clu·&òis:S go~ C gcø s~ ~_ll't: :8"'~£'êtæ~ -:.....8-.6. 8~""Qãíc!!0~~ o-g o~ æ·~.!!2 ¡¡ s-s-g CI'~: 8 U,g,§ 01l1l.ª~.! z_ç,.:_~::Js ~& 2! g..8.s g"si U'5 ë-g g g~"2< .0 CLSLLLL fI) aJ Õ ~ "-6 -g:8 õõ.~.~ "DÕ.!! C Q) .8 CI -06'-> ä C O£ 't)A di ~o; ti"el!! G> §-B b>-'::€ ~>.<!: s '" 0 - CI,!! &::::B-o ill.. II -g 0 f " 0'" II> .. ,. G> CI 1; = Q '" º'"" ~£.!!=.¡;- .S.¡; ã: c õ~~s :~!1ij~i5..8 ~i l! II> ~~'jl~;g.8g :i-8~~§c o&.:.~ ",16_oEO-g~~ "¡O .~ gg Qa o~ .. c 0 ~ ë G>;;;;= t;£.fio CI ~.~ ~.. i~: è'Õlb:~: ~ ,199;' . ?c::!JI.O.......... .~~. E~o<~g~~lI>oeZ~~·~¿·· ~.~II>- ~5..Q._~-o-o<oa~ ~ ci£E~ .=!~.alõ§i bSQ~ += '- 0.... D:::S 0'5'" 0 . c: u~ :I ~~.x 2!a:0¿¡'¡; 0 c~- i!,~II...!!= ~:æ> 0 QUo ~~- o~ c_o ~ ci'ð'E., tI'52c:II>Q._~cllo .._ CClU~~a:lUO ~ClC~Oc.-=r ~.~8~~S .iõ;~:õ·i°'¡;~~.s e ..0)4) ~~Q."CE! C - GJ. ~ã:~~:æÊ~~""g~-~~ ·ci=~ åÈ CI.t-o:.s 80a:~ ~ g.~-g BlI.š~~:S go ~~~ æ .~o. ~ o-~~ ~82 ~.~t E"~'~.!! 8 à.go~ ~.2_,,~u.s II> Q~-"~c'i5>!0ã:.-!!_ b ._ ~.B.B~~~~s.sl&ij~J!~i! -.!:.!! Oc £'ë> ~> i~ E~ gß I'! o~ ~~ ",< :0- "20 _2:0 EXHIBIT B TO CERTIFICATE Summary of Statements Representatives of the University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation appeared before the Authority to explain the proposed project and plan of financing. No one appeared in opposition to the bond issue. EXHIBIT C RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF UP TO $8,000,000 REVENUE BONDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia (11 Authority") , is empowered by (a) the Albemarle County Code to finance medical facilities and certain research oriented businesses, and (b) the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, Chapter 33, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Act"), to issue its revenue bonds for the purpose of financing the acquisition, construction, equipping and refinancing of facilities for use by organizations described in Section 501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (11 Code 11) , which are exempt from federal income taxation pursuant to Section 501(a) of the Code; WHEREAS, the Authority has received a request from University of Virginia Real Estate Foundation, a Virginia non- stock corporation ("Foundation"), requesting that the Authority issue its revenue bonds to assist in financing the Foundation's acquisition, construction and equipping of a facility to be leased to the University of Virginia for education and research purposes ("Project"); WHEREAS, such assistance will benefit the inhabitants of the County of Albemarle, Virginia and the Commonwealth of Virginia, by protecting and promoting their health and welfare and assisting in the provision of modern and efficient medical services; WHEREAS, preliminary plans for the Project have been described to the Authority and a public hearing has been held as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (IICode") and Section 15.1-1378.1 of the Act; and WHEREAS, the Foundation has represented that the estimated cost of the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project and all necessary reserves and expenses of issue will require an issue of revenue bonds in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $8,000,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. 1. It is hereby found and determined that (a) the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project will be in the public interest and will promote the commerce, safety, health, welfare, convenience or prosperity of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the County of Albemarle, Virginia and their citizens, and (b) the activities to be conducted at the Project are to be · , conducted as medical facilities or research oriented businesses as contemplated by the Albemarle County Code. 2. To induce the Foundation to locate the Project in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and particularly in the County of Albemarle, Virginia the Authority hereby agrees to assist the Foundation in financing the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project by undertaking the issuance of its revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 upon terms and conditions mutually agreeable to the Authority and the Foundation. The bonds will be issued pursuant to documents satisfactory to the Authority. The bonds may be issued in one or more series at one time or from time to time. 3. It having been represented to the Authority that it is necessary to proceed immediately with the acquisition, planning and construction of the Project, the Authority agrees that the Foundation may proceed with plans for the Project, enter into contracts for land, construction, materials and equipment for the Project, and take such other steps as it may deem appropriate in connection with the Project; provided, however, that nothing in this resolution shall be deemed to authorize the Foundation to obligate the Authority without its consent in each instance to the payment of any moneys or the performance of any acts in connection with the Project. The Authority agrees that the Foundation may be reimbursed from the proceeds of the bonds for all expenditures and costs so incurred by it, provided such expenditures and costs are properly reimbursable under the Act and applicable federal laws. 4. At the request of the Foundation, the Authority approves Messrs. McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, as Bond Counsel in connection with the issuance of the bonds. 5. All costs and expenses in connection with the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project, including the fees and expenses of Bond Counsel and Authority Counsel, shall be paid by the Foundation or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, from the proceeds of the bonds. If for any reason such bonds are not issued, it is understood that all such expenses shall be paid by the Foundation and that the Authority shall have no responsibility therefor. 6. In adopting this resolution the Authority intends to take "official action" toward the issuance of the bonds and to evidence its "official intent" to reimburse from the proceeds of the bonds any expenditures paid by the Foundation to finance the acquisition, planning and construction of the Project before the issuance of the bonds, all within the meaning of regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to Sections 103 and 141 through 150 and related sections of the Code. -2- 7. The Authority recommends that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, approve the issuance of the bonds. 8. No bonds may be issued pursuant to this resolution until such time as the issuance of the bonds has been approved by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia. 9. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. -3- August 7, 1995 Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle, Virginia Charlottesville, Virginia Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia Proposed Financing for The University of Virginia Health Services Foundation The University of Virginia Health Services Foundation ("Foundation") has requested that the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority") assist the Foundation in (i) financing various acquisition, construction, renovation and equipment projects of the Foundation located in Albemarle County, the City of Charlottesville, Orange County, Nelson County, Fluvanna County and Louisa County and (ii) refunding certain outstanding indebtedness of the Foundation by the issuance of its revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $ 8 , 000 , 000 (" Bonds") . As set forth in the resolution of the Authority attached hereto ("Resolution"), the Authority has agreed to issue its Bonds as requested. The Authority has conducted a public hearing on the proposed financing and has recommended that you approve the issuance of the Bonds as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Section 15.1- 1378.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. Attached hereto is (1) a certificate evidencing the conduct of the public hearing and the action taken by the Authority, (2) the Fiscal Impact Statement required pursuant to Virginia Code Section 15.1-1378.2, and (3) the form of resolution suggested by counsel to evidence your approva 1 Development le County, Sec ary, Industr Authority of Albem Virginia CERTIFICATE The undersigned Secretary of the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia ("Authority") certifies as follows: 1. A meeting of the Authority was duly called and held on August 7, 1995, at 4:00 o'clock p.m. ln Meeting Room 235 (Totier Room) on the second floor of the County Office Building at 401 McIntire Road, in Charlottesville, Virginia, pursuant to proper notice given to each Director of the Authority before such meeting. The meeting was open to the public. The time of the meeting and the place at which the meeting was held provided a reasonable opportunity for persons of differing views to appear and be heard. 2. The Chairman announced the commencement of a public hearing on the application of The University of Virginia Health Services Foundation and that a notice of the hearing was published once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in the County of Albemarle, Virginia ("Notice"), with the second publication appearing not less than six days nor more than twenty-one days prior to the hearing date. A copy of the Notice has been filed with the minutes of the Authority and is attached as Exhibit A. 3. A summary of the statements made at the public hearing is attached as Exhibit B. 4. Attached as Exhibit C is a true, correct and complete copy of a resolution ("Resolution") adopted at such meeting of the Authority by a majority of the Directors present at such meeting. The Resolution constitutes all formal action taken by the Authority at such meeting relating to matters referred to in the Resolution. The Resolution has not been repealed, revoked, rescinded or amended and is in full force and effect on this date. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Authority, this 7th day of August, 1995. Secre ry, Industri Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia (SEAL) Exhibits: A - Copy of Certified Notice B - Summary of Statements C - Inducement Resolution -2- EXHIBIT A ~12,~ prdl~' f,rJ;Jgx:çßß Charlottesville, Virginia 22906 Telephone: 8CI4/978-720C CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION CITY/COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA '1'0: ~C' G' "¿~L I ~ i::J VIRGINIA, AND APPEARED IN THE ISSUE(S) d'-\ ~ ~\ . /199~ . , GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS \ DAY OF I,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE WAS PUBLISHED IN " THE DAILY PROGRESS" A NEWSPAPER IN CI~OTTESVILLE, DATED \..~ ~ C'~ (j 0~~ """,,, ""'&;? CAROL A'. MAWYER/ èREd T MANAGER/NOTARY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: SEPT. 30, 1996 ~'-L""" 6 .- ,199~ PUBLISHING FEE: $ 33 \ ,1S, ~\ C-=-~...!-I.tI. .g~i~~o ~ èi.E ã.ãi ~ ~ ~õ g._o §c.Eá..!!.s . Uell., CD "0 èõ~§~~o:¡¡ o O'þ:: " ~ 2'..=:tr~ '3&:§~ . ;:'ÕI ['3..... ~~5 ~Z"~~.~~ ~"2~o~u:> ui CD ~~ ~~8 c-!.....!. CII ~êi'i .5~,g _GaR C c.E D 8....:; gõ~õ ~ 2':¡~ ~ &:§ ãí :;:'3...~;; o u >.= C ~·ëii~~ ~"2~=.ãB c.øcøt:u.2. iä.!!~ ~ ~õ Q.5 E¿j.Q Þ !a: IN CD N c ~õ;::-5'ø 5 ~~ "".S ~u ò' ~üi~tn-"~'tI. ~~~-2 £ Ox ~.;¡ ~t-j; ~ e eo _> ~~ ær"2~ ai _cøclSõ~~2 áo '--"", ~ ~o;lj; ãI~.a ~UN~a.Uu.. "-(\1. üO;::5 .... "C:>.,c. ~.¡¡~~.~ ~E-'õ ~::J)ë ..~ ~ ~ å.l~ ~~~.!! ã. ..õ 5 Q... c:ð_= ON:I 0 ¡Õ¡!! -'È U:JCD::J ~~~8 ~ g ê5Õ.!!.~ "tJõ.!! C CD c-.. ",£> ¡¡ ~.!:.~:; .8 ...<;'5 00. !!> ""- 0 -0.. ...= C>:; ~.= >_ ~ 5-0 ù::¡¡:! s:::g"O . ¡&..1' 0 i.. 000 a ~ i'; .... ".£;£!:;.!:{; ~ c ~:;-5ti1<\oo!5ti1--.8 - >.,.3·- Q- qI ¡!I G,) ~ Q..c ~..o~~ ~ 02 'I! ~:~~ ~ g~8~ o~~~o~~ ..; - E 5-0 è5 E .¡ 0 ~:J-~go¡c~~ë ..!! g-2 fitO.. ..·."::U.. 2 ~ ..... ~-- ~._"'tJ ... >.. ;:. :~-[l õ·ã.t~ o~ ~ fi ~~~]~~~.!! ~~ ~ ~ ~~ð~2·ê ~E'I!E~o~ c>-a1_.G~mu:> !1j!ci:bo"2Þ ,.¡:;"OG;:gg.ÞG .~ . ~~~!QNc~Ëc~~~1~.!!~~~g ~o oa:~::J'=:ICJr-o-o~G'" £J-OC\l ~~~~8£~ ·b~o~l':>O~N £G~ ~c ~>~]_~~:JG<b.~ _ ìiõ811'Ìi:o~ ._.80!:::&.!!G>c,,S·ë. o ~ø_a_e. .~c ~£:Jc~_ '<:-0 ""'::e Ejo= ~ G ~.... C> c_ 0_.= ~ u·~- 0 ~>s£~>...~OGo~>o = Èãí",:sQ :;.s- ãí III !-.!! c G ..<: J:J.~ . a:: < ci- 0 C t: 0.0 c o~_..!' lilt ~8~~~õ"~~i~õ~~~g~ãí~~~ .. ~ g'2~5=s.2 at ~ co~8 ~ ~cu ã.!!·ü; .r=.o.a<-bc.õaJo a.~.g Li.s<~~~.s~..ð CJw:z~~ ~~~:8õ~,;, ~Æ.gos;;-= ê:i:i: ~::>~%a: _b·Õ:>C.."2a:o>~ cc3:>o a:% W !!! :>.= Q.o~:>o.. G> g..,g.- i:'Ø ù5~~~~~=<=>:..~..&:ð~s- e§c' -; ZW ow~ ~ë~=£L.!!!..Q~~:J=.~-g5 ua:o-'5CJ >~ §õ ~E'c '" ãI .:: ¡{!'õõ..- ~o~~<g; ãa.o..c: ca>~ !ðm- ~ §'~.ª~ !tIwuwu..> li:..!!u~ Gõi!l-o .æs.. 0 uãí" ::>cn2:oo>", G>G.!!"~þC-o"M .-=u..G>õ a.o< .>-~ ;;~Ìilî-;¡¡5:~OÞÕ....g.. :sa.3;..Jt:% ~è EÞã a;~ "'oæ°;5855! Ei!Î w~u..~a:õ .!!tiI.!~ .~ ...,g_N:;Oõj c:'~ ~ 5,2a.a~gu ~~<5'§§-ª~~~8o:¡¡,~.gõ·ë" ~ zø~ ~i~~a!~~'~ mg~o~ ~ðg5~' %£Þ<-.2!~~·gù5';¡~s ~i:'~~ - r ga~~..s~!¿ :i:~:~5.2~ g ~ -.9 . ~ ~ ~.. -,> -" ~gþg.~~ goos ~~ g c -;~£;-o 5~~r="E ~~ u aJ~.!! ... ¡-._ 0 ~ ~..Qo ~fõ g~~ ~"B ë.s~~ ~~ ~ - 0'- CD D.ài5 _Q ø ã¡ ]j goo -o~ oo~ "'~G> ~!tIO E :>.so c-oo c"" "'G> cr o.~ .!..!! c "" -0....0 u.9-c\i 4D ~ 0 0 aJ "¡j OX< 1Ø:J-àJ.. .~c:¡õ~~c ..äf,?:-u .~1!0Q.~..-- ~1'~~~~..! ~~ ~¥.!!' - CD E E1:i~.2~ ~ 8t=~ ~.~ i¡.g"g Q.ãi ~~ O.S.':' -fè C>tile..!! c" s-~~~: ~ .~.==: e ~~5-&85 .. '"- o_~___cn.. Q.>:>_ ~ - CUScaGCI)Z=_ a...o-·o l' g.", ~ ÌiI ~~.:~ ~ <~þ==:.g.. CD iiI.!!::J 0 U .. ,- 05 .-=~.¡¡..s g ~ g ~ :r~æ ~.. "!!'Q5 g'3:-~8: -.. co., 00:> 'I>';'..!! '.'" C8 b. :> (J -- oo..o_~èa "::"- >..:JG a :> :g ..-:Ecn:;"'.<: !!o'-"'<z::... ~~..u"'«..-u "oi-~" c.2:~ !~ca>~_ ..¿~ CG&"22; 8_ C tGs:šLõ(') 0 : !- a ~G. ca= C)o:t::Ë.g-~.iãi.~ :! :.!!g._~~~ ~ E 8.·->-:>"t>U. 1-"'-0 =- I-QoQ.~ c:.oo .!! I-s-g~ -ur;; N·ã.~ a ã.i!~ä~~·ä.'..; ~.8~~~~ g-fè ~b ~ ëgo.s c!: ""c '" e .-:.~ "'L. o]!.g .. å.SÞ",,:ïI a.!! U ..- 2 g.èi=;:j]!'õ'.,g£ c>.§:g ° !cg~·=cn~~" ..- ...s", c>-o ã.- c' ..=~-.. .co.g ~õ ãrii ã. 4D :!'E" aI_ ]j o&~ ä-gCJ~ ~¡.. :J CCIO_ a: >..>.c ... 8'8:8:~ ¡ c~:¡¡ Õõ ~ .2i3} c:~~zu c ~ g-~ 00 .. 0 ... 2 o;E-o-'I!~ã-..o.2 ~-o- e '" ..-5 c '" Uo" . c III åiãi" 0 "o;.5~g¡. ..... a E u U aI_OZ --5" ~ EXHIBIT B TO CERTIFICATE Summary of Statements Representatives of The University of Virginia Health Services Foundation appeared before the Authority to explain the proposed projects and plan of financing. No one appeared in opposition to the proposed bond issue. EXHIBIT C RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF UP TO $8,000,000 REVENUE BONDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Albemarle County, Virginia, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia ("Authority"), is empowered by (a) the Albemarle County Code to finance medical facilities, and (b) the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, Chapter 33, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Act"), to issue its revenue bonds for the purpose of financing the acquisition, construction, equipping and refinancing of facilities for use by organizations described in Section 501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), which are exempt from federal income taxation pursuant to Section 501(a) of the Codei WHEREAS, the Authority has received a request from The University of Virginia Health Services Foundation, a Virginia non-stock corporation ("Foundation"), requesting that the Authority issue its revenue bonds to assist in (i) financing various acquisition, construction, renovation and equipment projects (collectively, "Project") for the Foundation in Albemarle County, the City of Charlottesville, Nelson County, the Town of Orange and in Fluvanna County or Louisa County and (ii) refunding the outstanding principal amount of the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Charlottesville, Virginia's $3,300,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bond (University of Virginia Health Services Foundation), issued on January 20, 1984 ("Prior Bond") to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Virginia Ambulatory Surgery Center; WHEREAS, such assistance will benefit the inhabitants of the County of Albemarle, Virginia and the Commonwealth of Virginia, by protecting and promoting their health and welfare and assisting in the provision of modern and efficient medical servicesi WHEREAS, preliminary plans for the Project and the refunding of the Prior Bond ("Refunding") have been described to the Authority and a public hearing has been held as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, ("Code") and Section 15.1-1378.1 of the Act; and WHEREAS, the Foundation has represented that the estimated cost of the Refunding and the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project and all necessary reserves and expenses of issue will require an issue of revenue bonds in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $8,000,000. , . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. 1. It is hereby found and determined that (a) the Refunding and the acquisition, construction, renovation and equipping of the Project will be in the public interest and will promote the commerce, safety, health, welfare, convenience or prosperity of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the County of Albemarle, Virginia and their citizens, and (b) the activities to be conducted at the Project are medical facilities as contemplated by the Albemarle County Code. 2. To induce the Foundation to locate the Project in the Commonwealth of Virginia, the Authority hereby agrees to assist the Foundation in financing the Refunding and the acquisition, construction, renovation and equipping of the Project by undertaking the issuance of its revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $8,000,000 upon terms and conditions mutually agreeable to the Authority and the Foundation. The bonds will be issued pursuant to documents satisfactory to the Authority. The bonds may be issued in one or more series at one time or from time to time. 3. It having been represented to the Authority that it is necessary to proceed immediately with the acquisition, planning and construction of the Project, the Authority agrees that the Foundation may proceed with plans for the Project, enter into contracts for land, construction, materials and equipment for the Project, and take such other steps as it may deem appropriate in connection with the projecti provided, however, that nothing in this resolution shall be deemed to authorize the Foundation to obligate the Authority without its consent in each instance to the payment of any moneys or the performance of any acts in connection with the Project. The Authority agrees that the Foundation may be reimbursed from the proceeds of the bonds for all expenditures and costs so incurred by it, provided such expenditures and costs are properly reimbursable under the Act and applicable federal laws. 4. At the request of the Foundation, the Authority approves Messrs. McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, as Bond Counsel in connection with the issuance of the bonds. 5. All costs and expenses in connection with the Refunding and the acquisition, construction, renovation and equipping of the Project, including the fees and expenses of Bond Counsel and Authority Counsel, shall be paid by the Foundation or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, from the proceeds of the bonds. If for any reason such bonds are not issued, it is understood that all such expenses shall be paid by the Foundation and that the Authority shall have no responsibility therefor. -2- ,. t \ . 6. In adopting this resolution the Authority intends to take "official action" toward the issuance of the bonds and to evidence its "official intent" to reimburse from the proceeds of the bonds any expenditures paid by the Foundation to finance the acquisition, planning and construction of the Project before the issuance of the bonds, all within the meaning of regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to Sections 103 and 141 through 150 and related sections of the Code. 7. The Authority recommends that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, approve the issuance of the bonds. 8. No bonds may be issued pursuant to this resolution until such time as the issuance of the bonds has been approved by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia and by the governing body of each jurisdiction in which any proceeds of the bonds are to be applied. 9. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. -3- COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Police Mutual Aid Agreement AGENDA DATE: September 6, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: 9S0f(J6.{.s. s:) INFORMATION: ACfION: SUBJECfIPROPOSAL/REOUEST: Request for the Board of Supervisors to authorize the execution of the Police Mutual Aid Agreement CONSENT AGENDA: ACfION: X INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: o STAFF CONTACf(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Miller REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: The City of Charlottesville, Albemarle County and the University of Virginia Police Departments have long enjoyed a cohesive working relationship across jurisdictional lines. In order to benefit all three police departments in the execution of their nonnal duties as well as outlining a fonnal agreement for the exchange and sharing of resources, the attached mutual agreement is being presented to all three entities for approval. This agreement spells out specific resources that are to be shared such as the Joint Narcotics Investigative Unit, DEA Federal Task Force, and the Joint Multi-Agency K-9 coverage. Additionally, additional law enforcement support can be provided to other jurisdictions upon request and the conditions and protocols for doing so are outlined in the agreement. The County Attorney has reviewed the document and approved it for execution. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Executive to execute the attached agreement., 95,129 POLICE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 1995, by and among the CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE (the "City"), a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE (the "County"), and the UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA (the "University"), WHEREAS, Sections 15.1-131 and 15.1-159,7 of the Code of Virginia authorize the governing bodies of the County and City and University to enter into reciprocal agreements for mutual aid for emergency purposes, for maintenance of peace and good order and for cooperation in the furnishing of police services, and WHEREAS, the City, County and the University have determined that the provision of police aid across jurisdictional lines will increase their ability to respond to law enforcement emergencies involving immediate threats to life or public safety in their respective jurisdictions, and will assist them in the preservation of public safety and welfare of the entire area; and WHEREAS, it is deemed to be mutually beneficial to the parties hereto to enter into an agreement concerning mutual aid and cooperation with regard to law enforcement; and WHEREAS, the parties desire that the terms and conditions of this Police Mutual Aid Agreement be established; NOW THEREFORE, WIT N E SSE T H: That for and in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived from a Police Mutual Aid Agreement, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows: 1. Each party will endeavor to provide police support to the jurisdictions which are parties to this Agreement within the capabilities available at the time the request for such support is made and within the terms of this Agreement. 2. Requests for assistance pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be made by the requesting jurisdiction's City Manager, County Executive or Chief Administrative Officer, whichever is applicable, or their respective designee(s). 3. The requesting jurisdiction shall be responsible for designating a radio communications system for use by the requested jurisdiction, 4. The personnel of the requested jurisdiction shall render such assistance under the direction of the Chief of Police or other principal law enforcement officer of the requesting jurisdiction. 5, Law enforcement support provided pursuant to this Agreement shall include, but not be limited to, the following resources: uniformed officers, canine officers, forensic support, plainclothes officers, special operations personnel and related equipment. 6. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, and without limiting in any way the other circumstances or conditions in which mutual aid may be requested and provided under this Agreement, the parties hereto agree to provide assistance to the requesting jurisdiction in situations requiring the mass processing of arrestees and transportation of arrestees, The parties to this Agreement further agree to assist the requesting jurisdiction with security and operation of temporary detention facilities. 7. The parties to this Agreement specifically agree and authorize the continuation, and if necessary, expansion, of existing cooperative law enforcement 2 arrangements dealing with (a) the Joint Narcotics Investigative Unit; (b) the Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA") Federal Task Force; and (c) joint multi-agency K-9 coverage. 8. Nothing contained in this Agreement should in any manner be construed to compel any of the parties hereto to respond to a request for police support when the police personnel of the jurisdiction to whom the request is made are, in the opinion of the requested jurisdiction, needed or are being used within the boundaries of that jurisdiction, nor shall any such request compel the requested jurisdiction to continue to provide police support to another jurisdiction when its police personnel or equipment, in the opinion of the requested jurisdiction, are needed for other duties within the boundaries of its own j u risd iction. 9. The responsibility for investigation and subsequent actions concerning any criminal offense shall remain with the police agency of the locality whose court has original jurisdiction over the offense. Entering police personnel shall promptly notify the police agency of the entered locality upon discovery of a crime over which the court of the entered locality has original jurisdiction. 10. Officers acting pursuant to this Agreement shall be granted authority to enforce the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and to perform the other duties of a law enforcement officer; such authority shall be in conformance with Sections 15.1-131, 15,1- 131,3,15.1-131.5, and 15.1-159.7 of the Code of Virginia as may be applicable; however, police officers of any jurisdiction who might be casually present in any other jurisdiction shall have power to apprehend and make arrests only in such instances wherein an 3 apparent, immediate threat to public safety precludes the option of deferring action to the local police agency. 11. All police officers, agents, and other employees of the parties to this Agreement who are acting pursuant to this Agreement shall have the same powers, rights, benefits, privileges, and immunities in each jurisdiction subscribing to this Agreement, including the authority to make arrests in each such jurisdiction subscribing to this Ag reement. 12. The services performed and expenditures made under this Agreement shall be deemed to be for public and governmental purposes and all immunities from liability enjoyed by the local government within its boundaries shall extend to its participation in rendering assistance outside its boundaries. It is understood that for the purposes of this Agreement, the responding party is rendering aid once it has entered the jurisdictional boundaries of the party receiving assistance. 13. All pension, relief, disability, worker's compensation, life and health insurance, and other benefits enjoyed by said employees shall extend to the services they perform under this Agreement outside their respective jurisdictions. Each party agrees that provisions of these benefits shall remain the responsibility of the primary employing jurisdiction. 14. Each party agrees that, in activities involving the rendering of assistance to a requesting jurisdiction pursuant to this Agreement, each party shall (i) waive any and all claims against all other parties to this Agreement which may arise out of such parties' activities outside their respective jurisdictions; and (ii) indemnify and save harmless the 4 other parties to this Agreement from all claims by third parties for property damage or personal injury which may arise out of the activities of the other parties to this Agreement outside their respective jurisdictions, consistent with Section 15.1-131 of the Code of Virginia and to the extent permitted under other applicable laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 15. The parties to this Agreement shall not be liable to each other for reimbursement for injuries to personnel or damage to equipment incurred when going to or returning from another jurisdiction. Neither shall the parties hereto be liable to each other for any other costs associated with, or arising out of, the rendering of assistance pursuant to this Agreement. 16. This Agreement sets forth the complete agreement relating to the provision of mutual police services among the parties hereto, and supersedes all previous agreements, whether written or oral, relating to such services. 17. Any of the parties hereto may withdraw from this Agreement by giving ninety (90) days written notice to that effect to the other parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective City Manager, County Executive, and chief administrative officer, the official seal of each city and county affixed hereto and attested by their respective city and county clerks, and university official, and indicating thereafter the ordinance or resolution authorizing the execution. ATTEST: CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE 5 .. By: City Clerk Resolution/Ordinance No. Adopted on ATTEST: By: County Clerk Resolution/Ordinance No. Adopted on ATTEST: By: Resolution/Ordinance No. Adopted on 5/PMAA.ACU By: City Manager COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE By: County Executive UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA By: 6 Chief Administrative Officer To: State Compensation Board For: Month of J", I y I ~c¡ S- DistTl/:¡~t2J Î() Ro¡jrd:ill~/%, At~d. l!em No. _9Sb8:'/~{Ç ç) ::};:;:}/::;:};:::::::::::;::::::::::;::;:::::::;:;:;:;}::{::;:::;::::;::::;=:)::::;:;:;;:;:-:-:.:-......... .............................................. ............................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..................... .................................... ................ ........... STATEMENT OF EXPENSES .................................................,...,.,....-.._',...,._--"..... ...... ........ ........................... - .... -.- -- - -..-.. ...........................................................-.........-... .............................................,..-........-..........,.,.... .. :BH\IJ.·····..·....eH.ìm}··:··..·.·...~...·..................................~HH..................... ..... . ....... ... . . -. " .. .. . .. .. ..'- .... ..... ... '. ...... ...... . '. ... ..... ". . - . . .'- . ..... .. '. . ....-.. ............,..............................................................................-...........-:.....-..-_._............-..-_....-_._-.--'.'. ................... .......... ............. .......... ............................................................. . . . . .. .. -. ... -. "',... .. .. ..... ... .. .-.'...-.........,.............. .......... '.. '. ........ Department of Finance Clerk, Circuit Court - 0 - ;{ :;- s 'i. ;( s- c::? s.s- '/. c? 05- Note: Expenses listed above are only those office expenses in which the state Compensation Board has agreed to participate, and are not the total office expenses of these departments. .., COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DrSTRIBur~c T"': -, - . _ 'I _ _ " b" '''~ ON ---....... .8'--/" - 2~.__ AGENDA TITLE: Albemarle County and School's Health Insurance Summary for 1/94 through 3/31/95 AGENDA DATE: September 6, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: 9~ðf)/¡,(s:0 INFORMATION: ACfION: SUBJECf/PROPOSALIREOUEST: Information provided on the County's Health Insurance for 1/94 through 3/31/95 CONSENT AGENDA: ACfION: INFORMATION: X ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACf(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Brandenburger REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Each year as part of our on-going review of the County's health insurance, information is provided as to our utilization which is then used to track benefit design and to help develop educational materials for better employee utilization of their coverage. The enclosed review for the period April 1, 1994 through March 31, 1995 shows that the County's total health care expenditures decreased by 196/0 over the prior year and shows several key areas where our expenses were well below averages in the indusby, RECOMMENDATION: The summary is provided for the Board's information, 95.128 +V TIUGON Trigon BlueCross BJueShield ALBEMARLE COUNTY AND SCHOOLS April 1, 1994 through March 31, 1995 Overall Experience Total health care expenditures decreased 19% and were more than $3.2 million for the period of April 1, 1994 through March 31, 1995. Inpatient facility charges represented 20 % of total expense, while outpatient facility charges represented 22 %. Average enrollment for the review period was 1,765 which was fairly constant from the prior year. Individual coverage continued to be the predominant choice among employees. Nearly 70% of employees selected KeyCare III coverage, while 23% chose the KeyCare II option. The remaining 7 % chose the Comprehensive plan. Inpatient Experience As previously stated, inpatient facility expense represented 20 % of total expense which is well below average. Typically, expense from this setting represents 38 - 42 % of overall expense. There is a nationwide trend to shift services from the inpatient facility setting to the outpatient setting (both facility and professional). When this occurs, inpatient facility expense becomes a lower percentage of total expense, outpatient expense and utilization increases, and the cost of each service in the outpatient setting becomes slightly more expensive. The net result is a reduction in overall expense because services rendered in the outpatient setting are less expensive than the same service rendered in the inpatient setting. Exhibit 1 below shows the key utilization and expense indicators in the inpatient facility setting. The total group experience is shown as well as each benefit plan. Normative data is given to provide a means of comparison. Exhibit 1 Inpatient Facility - Key Indicators Total Group Comp KCII KCIII Norm Admit Rate 57.0 22.8 114.8 44.6 80.3 Days· Rate 218.3 164.4 I 488.5 149.9 394.7 ALOS 3.83 7.20 4.26 3.36 4.91 Cost/Day $976 $1,150 $909 $806 $1,208 Cost/Admit $3,736 $8,278 $3,871 $2,709 $5,934 +V TIUGON Trigon BIueCross ~lueShield The Comprehensive plan had the lowest admission rate and days rate; however, the average length of stay was significantly above average and above the experience of the other plans. The cost per admission was significantly higher than the two KeyCare plans as well as the normative data. Typically, a higher average length of stay combined with more expensive admissions indicates a greater severity of illness. The data in Exhibit 1 indicates that employees suffering from more severe illnesses are enrolled in the Comprehensive plan and the KeyCare II plan. Inpatient facility experience for the KeyCare III plan was significantly below average for all utilization and expense indicators. Because the greatest percentage of employees are enrolled in this plan, this plan's experience impacted the overall experience. Total group experience was also significantly below the average for all indicators. When the data were examined by diagnostic category, obstetrical care accounted for 21 % of inpatient facility expense, while circulatory illnesses accounted for 16% of the expense in this setting. Significant levels of expense were also seen for cancers and psychiatric care. The majority of admissions and expense were incurred at two hospitals; Martha Jefferson Hospital and University of Virginia Hospital. 59% of admissions and 53 % of the expense were incurred at Martha Jefferson Hospital, while 25 % of the admissions and 24 % of the expense were incurred at University of Virginia Hospital. Lifestyle-related disorders accounted for 28% of the total group's inpatient facility expense. Typically, lifestyle-related disorders represent about one-third of inpatient facility expense. For purposes of this analysis, a lifestyle related illness is defined as an illness whose severity could be reduced or incidents avoided through proper management. In some cases, the onset of the illness may have been avoided and, in others, the costs could have been lessened. 70 % of the lifestyle-related illnesses were incurred by group members enrolled in the KeyCare II plan. As a percent of total, inpatient professional services represented 10% of claims expeijse. The diagnostic categories mirrored tþe inpatient facility setting. For the employee group, the specialty of three of the top ten inpatient professionals was Obstetrical/Gynecology. Several of the top ten inpatient professionals for both the employee and the dependents groupings specialized in cardiovascular disease. -tv TRIGON Trigon BlueCross Bl!leShield Outpatient Experience Expense in the outpatient facility setting represented 22 % of total expense. In the prior year, expense in this setting represented 17 % of total expense. Outpatient professional services represented 35 % of total expense. The increase in the proportion of outpatient expense while inpatient facility expense declined as a percentage of total indicates a shift from the inpatient setting to the outpatient setting. As previously stated, services rendered in the outpatient setting will be less expensive than the same service in an inpatient setting. With a continued shift to the outpatient setting, Albemarle County and Schools should expect a reduction in overall expense. Exhibit 2 below shows the key utilization and expense indicators in the outpatient setting. As in Exhibit 1, the total group experience, each benefit plan, and normative data is given. Exhibit 2 Outpatient Experience - Key Indicators Total Comp KCII KCIII Norm Group Facility Case Rate 765.5 360.7 1121.3 707.3 685.4 Facility Cost/Case $293 $113 $250 $320 $354 Professional Service Rate 10,960 4,731 16,754 9,987 8,281 In contrast to the experience in the inpatient facility, outpatient expenence was significantly above the norm for both utilization indicators. The case rate in the facility was below average for the Comprehensive plan, but significantly above average for both KeyCare plans. For the total group as well as each benefit plan, the key expense indicator was slightly below average. The outpatient professional setting mirrored the facility setting. The service rate was significantly higher than average for both KeyCare plans and below average for the Comprehensive plan. KeyCare III experience impacted the total group experience, which was significantly higher than the norm. The majority of outpatient facility cases and expense were incurred at two hospitals; Martha Jefferson Hospital and University of Virginia Hospital. 56% of cases and 63 % of the expense were incurred at Martha Jefferson Hospital, while 37% of the cases and 24 % of the expense were incurred at University of Virginia Hospital. +V TIUGON Trigon BI,ueCross BIOeShield Prescription Drug Experience Pharmacy expense decreased 3 % from the prior year; however, its percentage of total expense increased. In the prior year, pharmacy expense represented 11 % of total expense. In the current year, the proportion has increased to 13 % . Typically, prescription drug expense with a drug card represents between 9% and 12 % of total expenditures. The decline in prescription drug expense was not as large as declines in other treatment setting; therefore, the percentage of expense attributable to pharmacy expense increased. This setting may not have decreased as much as other settings due to the use of maintenance drugs. 61 % of the drugs purchased in the current year were maintenance drugs. Continued use of maintenance drugs may increase the proportion of expense due to prescription drugs; however, it will help to keep costs to a minimum in other treatment settings. Maintenance drugs enable group members to control chronic conditions and prevents these conditions from worsening and requiring expensive inpatient facility stays. A table outlining the use of generic and brand name drugs is included in this report. The greatest number of claims were for brand name drugs where no generic alternative was available. There is little opportunity to reduce this cost in the future. Albemarle County and Schools group members effectively use generic drugs when possible. Only 10 % of the claims were for brand name formulations when a generic formulation was available and this percentage represents a decline from the prior year. Generic formulations are significantly less expensive on a per claim basis than brand name formulations. Albemarle County and Schools should make every effort to promote the use of generic formulations when possible. ¡ '......' ........ -- -,:-01 e .ecV(/~ IÎUß VeSt 16119~ . þ I . .Ø', (~ - ~~ Board of Directors Susan Painter, President Catheryn Mason, Vice President Michelle Picard, Secretary Dave Chapman, Treasurer Liz Akin, LCSW Joyce Allan, RN, MA, CS Marty Bass Kim Eggleston Jeffrey Fracher, Ph.D. Judy Herndon Mary Alice Hostetter Mary Ann Lally·Graves Jessica Lindstrom Cydnee Martin Marian Molnar Betty Wheelock Staff Annette DeGregoria Grimm, Executive Director Cindy M. Lamm, Ed.S., Associate Director Bambi Chapin, Children and Adolescent Program Coordinator Linda A. Snow, Administrative Assistant Geri Schirmer, Cherri Murphy, Adult Outreach Education Coordinators Lisa Speidel, Volunteer Coordinato, Sexual Assault Resource Agency SARA - serving the Piedmont community MEMORANDUM t 0 ¡ ;i ,', Ella CarS", . . . Clerk of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Bambi L. Chapin c/ C_ Children and Adotescents Program Coordinator August 9, 1995 1994-95 Child Assault Prevention (CAP) Project Annual Report for Albemarle County Public Schools You will find enclosed the Child Assault Prevention (CAP) Project Annual Report for the 1994-95 school year as it was implemented in your district. We have submitted this document for your records. Please review this report and use it as a reference. TO: FROM: DATE: RE: The report summarizes information about funding for the Project as well as the number of children and adults who participated in CAP during the past school year. It also details parents' and teachers' response to CAP and includes a statistical breakdown of the kinds of problems students brought up during our post-workshop review sessions. We hope you will find this information useful. SARA, the Sexual Assault Resource Agency, has been offering CAP to students, teachers and parents in the Charlottesville/ Albemarle community since the spring of 1990. Using role plays and guided group discussion, children learn problem solving strategies such as self-assertion, locating peer support and getting help from a trusted adult. Following the Workshop, children have an opportunity to speak individually with CAP's trained prevention specialists where they can apply what they have learned to their own experience, Workshops for parents and for teachers are held prior to the Children's Workshops. These presentations offer the adults in our community an orientation to the CAP approach to assault prevention as well as information about sexual assault, crisis intervention and community resources. During the upcoming school year, we are looking forward to returning to Albemarle County elementary schools that hosted CAP during 91/92. As we continue in our mission to keep children safe, strong and free, we thought that you would be interested in reviewing the progress of our work over the past year. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 295-7273. Thank you for your time and attention. . Hotline P.O. Box 6705 Community Education . Peer Support/Counseling . Resource Library . . Charlottesville, Virginia 22906 . (804) 977-7273 (hotline) (804) 295·7273 (office) . Child Assault Prevention Project 1994/95 Annual Report Albemarle County Public Schools . It · Table of Contents Elementary CAP TABLE 1: Summary of Elementary CAP Funding TABLE 2: Summary of Children's Workshops 2B: Teachers' Evaluations of Children's Workshops (Albemarle only) TABLE 3: Summary of Talk Time 3B: Summary of Talk Time Percentages 3C: Detailed Description of Talk Time Sessions - Albemarle Schools TABLE 4: Summary of Adult Workshops ADDENDUM: Letter from School Administration · · · · Elementàry CAP · · · · Elementary CAP SY 94/95 TABLE 1: Summary of Elementary CAP Funding n9~5 n9~6 Funding Projected Funding Actual Funding Projected Funding Request Children Received Children Request Children Received Served Served Served City of Charlottesville Albemarle County State $24,000 800 $12,000 368 $24,000 800 0 $36,000 1200 $36,000 1145 $36,000 1200 $36,000 0 0 $5500 $5500 $10,470 $10,740 $10,000 $10,000 General Fund . Elementary CAP SY 94/95 TABLE 2: Summary of Children's Workshops Brownsville 3,4 4 3 Greer 4,5 6 0 Hollymead 2 6 0 . Red Hill K-5 9 0 Scottsville K-5 9 0 Stone-Robinson K/l, 3, 5 15 0 Yan K-5 7 3 Ü.4¡n: Grades Opt Outs 2 7 0 2 6 0 2 4 0 2 4 0 2 4 0 5 0 JrQI1Ktm%iK_ffi.~¥f4§g*1fi.#äiMmBtällMMMMæ1lfM$WimïØ:HMHmtmlt-tttlW$J"'-;t¡HæMtiw.l$mM~l . . . . Elementary CAP SY 94/95 Table 2B: Teachers' Evaluations of Children's Workshops Albemarle County Schools Total number of evaluations returned: 51 :§iªiifi::J~~ill!rltija;:::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::¡:;:::¡:::::~:~:::::¡::::::::~:::':~:¡I¡:;:¡:::::I:~:::;::::::::::::¡:::::::::¡:::::::¡:::::¡:::::::::::::::::::::::::¡:::::::¡,:,::¡,¡:¡,¡,¡:¡::::;¡:¡¡¡;¡:¡::~::I:~II¡::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::¡:::::::¡::::;¡;:::::¡¡:::¡:¡¡¡::::¡:::::¡:~~::::~::::::::¡:::::::::::::::~::::::::I::¡::::::::¡¡:::¡::::::::::¡::::::::¡¡I¡~¡: Strongly Strongly No Disagree Agree Response 1 234 5 1. The facilitators were well prepared. 2. The facilitators were energetic and involved. 3. The facilitators maintained classroom discipline. 4. The teacher workshop prepared me to have CAP in my class. 5. I feel prepared. to respond to a disclosure of child abuse. 1 1 5 5 15 48 48 40 30 31 2 2 5 15 5 1 ¡~!iÎ9ñ::@::~i!ªª<imÎ91I¡Iiª¡:§I!ª:f~~~::mS.ß!!:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::¡:¡::¡::::¡¡¡:::¡:~:¡¡r¡;::::::~::~::¡;::;::¡:::::¡::::::::::¡:¡:::¡¡¡¡::¡¡¡¡:¡¡:¡¡:~:;::¡:::::::¡:¡:¡:¡¡::I::::::¡¡:¡:¡¡¡:¡'¡;¡¡¡¡:::::¡:~:~~:::¡¡:¡::¡::¡::;¡:::::r¡:i':¡¡¡::¡:¡::¡::¡¡¡:::¡:::¡::¡::¡::¡::I¡:¡:::::::::::::¡:::::::::::¡¡¡¡:::::¡¡:::::::::I: Strongly Strongly No Disagree Agree Response 1 234 5 1. Information about children's rights was presented in a way the class could easily understand, 2. Facilitators responded well to the children's concerns. 3. This information was appropriate for the age group. 4. This information is helpful for the students. 5. I think the students understand their personal rights, 6 45 4 7 6 9 47 44 45 40 2 6. This section was Too Short (0) Just Right (46) Too Long (2) No Response (3) ~F:~t!ªª::~~:'~!P~!::~::::::;;¡~::i;i~:f:::::::::::r:~·::'::::r~:'~.::,,:·::·:.:;::·::::~:::~:~¡:¡¡:::~:¡:::::::::¡:¡::;:::¡::::~::t:::¡:::¡::~:::¡:::::¡¡:¡:::::::::r:':::::¡:::::::::::::::::::;:::,):¡:::::::':'::;;~,r::~:::~:i:~:::::'iI~:;:;~~r~:;:::::::;::\';:::::;",::;:;:;:;;;::::::.::::::;:::;:,;,::::;;:¡¡;¡;;;;:ú:/~I::{~:f:If\;:::::::::::::::mm 1. Information about dealing with bullies was presented in a way the class could easily understand. 2. The children learned from the roleplays. 3. Facilitators responded well to the children's concerns. 4. This information was appropriate for the age group. 5. This information is helpful for the students. 6, I think the students understand how to deal with bullies. Strongly Strongly No Disagree Agree Response 1 2 3 4 5 8 42 1 7 43 1 6 43 2 1 6 43 1 5 45 1 2 16 31 2 7. This section was Too Short (0) Just Right (42) Too Long (4) No Response (5) ElemCAP Teacher Evaluations - 94/95 -Albemarle County- page 2 li~B,gü¡'>;¡¡§ttm¡f.I:¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡i¡:¡i¡¡¡:'¡¡¡¡¡¡¡::¡¡¡i:¡:¡¡¡:¡i:¡¡i¡¡¡¡i¡¡¡¡:¡¡:I¡:¡¡¡¡¡::¡:¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡:¡¡¡¡:¡:¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡i:¡:¡:¡¡¡¡¡:¡i:i¡¡¡:¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡i¡¡:i¡i¡i¡¡¡:¡:i¡¡i¡¡¡¡¡i¡¡¡¡¡¡¡iI¡¡¡i¡¡¡':i¡:¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡::¡¡¡::¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡:¡¡:¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡:¡¡:¡¡::¡¡¡¡I¡¡II:¡¡:¡¡:¡:¡¡¡¡¡i¡¡¡¡¡¡[¡¡¡¡j¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:~¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡~ii:¡¡¡¡ . Strongly Disagree 1 2 Strongly Agree 4 5 3 No Response 5 44 2 1. Information about strangers was presented in a way the class could easily understand. 2. The children learned from roleplays. 3. Facilitators responded well to the children's concerns. 4. This information was appropriate for the age group. 5. This information is helpful for the students. 6.1 think the students understand how to be safe around strangers. 1 4 7 5 4 9 44 42 44 45 39 1 7. This section was Too Short (0) Just Right (46) Too Long (2) No Response (3) ¡§!~ül:¡!~::ìlª!::III¡¡::¡¡¡:i¡¡!¡!i¡¡¡i¡i:i¡:¡:::::¡¡:¡:¡¡~¡i¡~:¡~:¡:¡;:¡:¡¡~::¡:¡:::¡:¡::::!¡¡::¡::¡:¡:!¡::::¡:¡¡::¡'¡:::!:::::¡!:!¡¡i::¡¡!¡¡:¡¡¡:¡:ii:::¡:'~:::ii¡:¡:::::::¡;i¡¡¡¡¡:~i¡::¡':::¡¡:'~i¡¡¡¡¡~:¡:¡¡::¡i::;:.:::~:¡:~::..:.¡;.:::::¡¡:::¡¡'¡::¡¡:::::¡;::i:¡¡::~¡:'¡Lq Strongly Disagree 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 ........ ...............................................................................................-........... ::::::::::::::::~:~:::::~;:;:~:;:tf~{i~Il@ft~im?JIrtf)t :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: ....... n. ... 4 Strongly Agree 5 No Response 1. Information about good and bad touching was presented 1 9 36 5 . in a way the class could easily understand. 2. The children learned from the roleplays. 1 7 38 5 3. Facilitators responded well to the children's concerns. 1 2 43 5 4. This information was appropriate for the age group, 1 3 42 5 5. This information is helpful for the students, 1 3 42 5 6. 1 think the students can identify good and bad touching. 3 14 29 5 7.1 think the students know how to respond to bad touching. 4 15 26 6 8. This section was Too Short (4) Just Right (38) Too Long (0) No Response (9) . . . . ElemCAP Teacher Evaluations - 94/95 - Albemarle County - page 3 [:§ilîg#~~;:¡:¡Ii1#M:illlqœiY9p.:[:n:¡:~:~:¡:¡:¡:~:~¡::¡:¡:¡~~~¡:¡:¡¡¡:I::I::I:::I:¡:[:¡:[:[:¡:I~:::~:::¡~¡:~:~:¡:¡:¡:~:¡~¡:I¡¡~t:¡:[:[:[:¡:r:III[:[:[:::¡:¡:~:[:[~¡¡:¡:~~::::I~:¡:::¡:¡:¡¡:[::¡¡¡:¡::¡:¡:II[¡¡:::¡:I¡t:¡I:[:¡~¡¡¡¡[:[:[:¡:¡:[:¡:::[:[:[:[:~:~¡¡:~~[:¡:¡¡~~~:I¡::¡¡:¡::~~~~¡¡:¡:[:[:¡¡~:~:¡:[:[:¡:[:¡:¡¡¡¡:¡:¡~~¡t:[:[:¡:::¡~~:~ 1. CAP is offered as part of the Family Life Curriculum. Do you feel this workshop helps "students develop an understanding of the positive and negative approaches from strangers, relatives, friends and others (Alb. Co. FLE Curriculum)?" YES (45) NO (0) UNSURE (2) NO RESPONSE (4) 2. Would you like to have CAP back next year to fulfill this portion of the FLE curriculum? YES (47) NO (0) UNSURE (0) NO RESPONSE (4) Comments: · "Children respond well to 'outsiders!'" (Kindergarten/1st grade) · ''Your lessons were very effective and presented in an excellent way." (Kindergarten/lst grade) · ''Yes - children need to see this and act it out." (2nd grade) · "CAP fulfills County objectives better than 1 can!" (2nd grade) · "This is my third time having CAP present. It's great. Students need this infonnation." (3rd grade) · "I think that it is a positive program! It might be better if the program was scheduled at the beginning of the year or mid-year," (4th grade) · 'They did a super job!" (4th grade) · 'Wish you could come back more often." (5th grade) · "It would be great to see CAP as part of the curriculum more frequently than every 4 years." (5th grade) · ''You were excellent facilitators! I'd like to have you back next year." (5th grade) 3. Scheduling CAP workshops is often difficult - what suggestions do you have for better integrating CAP into your schedule? · "It fit into my schedule perfectly. Even if it didn't, 1 would make time." (Kindergarten) · "Maybe earlier in the year - otherwise we can just be flexible. It works out fine." (Kindergarten) · "It was just fine the way we scheduled it." (Kindergarten/1st grade) · ''You did a fine job!" (Kindergarten/1st grade) · "I like the way we scheduled during our unit meeting (as a team)." (Kindergarten/1st grade) · "Perhaps a little more notice. It would have been better if K-l's weren't working on a program at the same time." (Kindergarten/1st grade) · "I'm flexible - it's not a problem." (1st/2nd grade) · "I'm flexible so it doesn't matter to me." (2nd grade) · 'We should be flexible enough to accommodate your schedule since you do an excellent job implementing this part of our curriculum." (2nd grade) · "I'm flexible." (2nd grade) · "I think scheduling was set up in the best manner possible." (2nd/3rd grade) · "We haven't had a problem with scheduling - we need to understand that these CAP folks have certain times to come and we need to be flexible." (3rd grade) · "It worked fine with Mrs. Chase scheduling." (3rd grade) · "I didn't have a problem with the schedule!" (3rd grade) · 'This schedule works fine for me." (3rd grade) · "Any scheduling is difficult; it will just have to work out." (3rd grade) · "It was not a problem." (4th grade) · "It seems to work out well here as is." (4th grade) · "I had no difficulty scheduling the workshop - it is important enough to make the time for it!" (4th grade) · "As long as times are set a week ahead of time, it is not a big problem to work in or schedule around." (4th grade) · "Scheduling 2 team teachers back to back for 2 days was a little hairy. Perhaps we should have considered one of us signing up a week apart." (4th/5th grade) · "A little earlier in the year - Springtime is hectic." (5th grade) . · · . · · · · · · · · · · · . · · ElemCAP Teacher Evaluations - 94/95 - Albemarle County - page 4 · "Send out note at the beginning of the school year and teachers can put dates on their calendars." (5th grade) · "There did not appear to be any problems." (5th grade) · "Set up times in the summer for the year." (5th grade) · "No problems with this." (5th grade) 4. If you felt uncomfortable with any portions of the presentation please list them below. · "I'm not sure the children really understand the part about touching. But I also don't know a better way to present it." (Kindergarten/1st grade) · "No - Section #5 done quite well." (3rd grade) · "It was said but emphasize the Uncle telling the child that it is 'our secret,' 'bad touches' - probably include such statements." (3rd grade) · "I thought the last portion with Uncle Harry was a little unclear to some of the students - possibly because it was new to them, they'd never imagined such a thing!" (3rd grade) · "Section 5 (Uncle Harry): Being a victim of child abuse myself, I found this uncomfortable for me as I do not like being reminded of it, but I realize this is important information to get to kids. Maybe if it had been available to me, I could have helped myself." (4th/5th grade) · "I did not feel uncomfortable." (5th grade) 5. If you have any follow-up plans that we can share with other teachers, please list them below. "Just to continually let the children know that I'm here for them. We will probably do some additional role playing to reinforce what they're learning." (Kindergarten/1st grade) "I plan to show a video - 'The Berenstain Bears Learn about Strangers.''' (Kindergarten/1st grade) "Role play situations." (Kindergarten/1st grade) "I always talk about hugging/ touching further with the students. Because I'm a hugger. I often put a hand on a child's shoulder when I'm speaking to him/her. I let my students know that if they'd rather I didn't touch or hug them to just tell me so!" (3rd grade) "Any writing/verbal response would be worthwhile." (5th grade) "Come back to touch base with kids that scheduled private time with you," (5th grade) "Discussion about how it's more important to be safe than it is to be polite - Kids worry about pleasing adults." (5th grade) 6. General Comments: · "Good job!" (Kindergarten) · "[The Uncle Harry Section] is very difficult. For the mood of these children, I think it was beyond their understanding because they could not relate. However, I think if they are ever in this type of situation they will recall the role play. I hope they will remember you and know who they can talk to. Thank you. You were very good." (Kindergarten) "Excellent presentations - the children were able to interact and their questions were welcomed! The follow-up was helpful because the children could voice their concerns (if any)." (Kindergarten) ''Very nice job, Ladies!!! The kids loved it!" (Kindergarten/1st grade) "Please don't reward inappropriate behavior by choosing that child to participate." (Kindergarten/1st grade) "You are doing a wonderful thing for children! You are 'saving lives' in this community!! Thank you very much for you fine efforts!" (Kindergarten/1st grade) 'Wonderful program! Thanks!" (Kindergarten/1st grade) "Very well done! Thank you!" (2nd grade) "My class in itself is a challenge to keep them on task but I feel you did a great job getting them back quiet and listening." (2nd grade) "Program again well done." (2nd grade) . · · · · · . · · · · · - ElemCAP Teacher Evaluations - 94/95 - Albemarle County - page 5 · "Each segment was not too long - but maybe shorten to 1 hour for 2nd/3rd grades over all. I feel that follow-up sessions with the guidance counselor would be effective." (2nd/3rd grade) · "Felt that this program resulted in important infonnation coming forward/out. Perhaps less role- playing of the same situation - this resulted in the presentation extending beyond the limits of many students ability to stay focused in one sitting. I thought the facilitators were great and enthusiastic!" (2nd/3rd grade) · "Good program." (3rd grade) · "Very well presented and handled - you were very sensitive to the students' questions and kept good control of the discussion!" (3rd grade) · "Would like to see an additional play concerning a bully because this is the most common problem for children this age that I hear about! Thanks a lot." (3rd grade) · "Well presented, on grade level. I liked the identifying the stranger exercise. High interest. Did good job of keeping kids involved and on task." (3rd grade) · In reference to Section 5: "Perhaps could do another role play? An additional one? Then again, they probably get the point right away and could upset some children if it went on too long." (3rd grade) · "Great presentation!" (3rd grade) · "I think it's a child friendly program and it is very helpful. I'm glad you come." (4th grade) · 'Well done! The children were very interested and attentive. They loved being involved! You may want to emphasize to them from the beginning that questions and comments are great, but stories will need to be saved for later! Thank you!" (4th grade) "CAP is a great program and it's presented in a way to make children feel comfortable and safe enough to express themselves." (4th grade) "l1ús is a very worthwhile program!" (4th grade) "Teachers could use a brief outline of the workshop - the different 'plays' or issues and what students can do to protect themselves. Then, when appropriate, teachers can remind the students." (4th grade) 'The program was presented well and in a way that the students could understand." (4th grade) "Section #5: With books and TV available, some children have been exposed to material that is inappropriate for them, and touching (good or bad) can be confusing. Some things that are seen on TV or in adult movies may seem good because the media allows it." (4th/5th grade) "I think the children need more encouragement to come forward for help." (5th grade) "Great!" (5th grade) "The program was very helpfuL" (5th grade) "Super job!" (5th grade) "I was very impressed by the CAP program. Facilitators were well prepared and very comfortable with their role. I liked the integrated discussion circle and interaction in helping the students process the strategies. Hopefully the skills acquired will be of help in preventing child assault. Thank you." (5th grade) · "Great program." (5th grade) · ''You did well - sorry some students were rude." (5th grade) · "A very valuable presentation for the students." (5th grade) · "CAP facilitators were very sensitive to individuality of the students." (5th grade) · "Excellent." (5th grade) · Elementary CAP SY 94/95 TABLE 3: Summary of Talk Time Burnley Moran Clark Greenbriar Jackson-Via Jolmson Venable t:> . :~.')J4 ':--.' Child. Talk Time Problem a t Solvin Wks Sess. Child. Sess. 73 38 23 23 80 47 29 33 46 17 13 13 67 49 26 31 52 30 20 21 50 26 29 13 15 : :::·::·:Jf.t.:J;$¥It.t.µJäMåŒ~lWtMt9:1:lWt.Œ~l· ···::tttJg4iWMW~~::::::::: . . .fjftl$!m!.l~J.WKåY5: .....:.. .Zi$.jliilffâaJ1 D isclo- Refer Con- sures· rals· tacts· Child. Child Child. 2 22 21 4 30 17 1 11 3 3 25 16 o 20 16 1 11 9 "::::;'" ..::::::.... .: 19.mItfiJifig:::ff ..... ..Œ1t~t.ln¡: · 29 30 17 18 4 27 27 14 14 2 45 45 31 31 0 63 72 44 53 2 79 82 48 51 5 94 98 64 68 7 53 57 33 36 1 .. ~mt.'t.it~tU¥ili*~11%%f.îïlrtW,w ....: :î$1l~ïm~lil!fi.í$f-I1m~%.. 17 15 14 11 32 24 43 33 48 33 65 45 33 20 ····:z.iª@)}~l~H ::~~I~~%~I~~~ :~Al@}f$jm@wtrÆiiUtWWtm~iwg~Mttt.~álwm$.$.Z@wm:6.g1t~:g@ß.î.$.il)å§::~~:@:mW.$gågMi~m:m~:@~J~~:m:: · For detailed listing 0 types 0 pro ems, referra s, and contacts see Table TABLE 3B: Summary of Talk Time Percentages CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE ALBEMARLE COUNTY COMBINED % of Children. who chose Talk Tirne(TT) 54% 34% 39% % of IT Children who Problem Solve 63% 64% 64% · · Elementary CAP SY 94/95 for Albemarle County TABLE 3C: Detailed Description of Talk Time Sessions Children who Talked to a Facilitator: 390 Children who Problem Solved: 251 ~¡¡:¡:¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡~¡¡:¡:¡:¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡l:¡:I¡Il¡r¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡II¡£ßº~§¡¡m?œ$~œ¡¡~:¡æ!~A¡ªmª~iª¡:J.tª::pf.9ljlm:¡¡¡¡¡~¡¡~:¡¡¡¡~¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡::¡¡¡::¡:¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡~¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡I:¡¡¡:~:¡:¡::¡::¡~¡¡¡¡I¡r¡:¡I Disclosures of Abuse or Neglect: 21 children disclosed 26 incidents of abuse or neglect sexual abuse -primary 5 emotional -primary 2 ritual -primary 0 -secondary 2 -secondary 0 -secondary 1 -primary 9 neglect -primary 0 -secondary 7 -secondary 0 Problems at Home 60 alcohol abuse issues 36 arguing between other relatives 16 relocating 16 family member in jail 14 financial difficulty 9 verbal abuse by caretaker 9 illegal activity 6 illegal substance abuse 6 foster care issues 5 homeless 5 new family member Problems with Peers: 49 fighting 51 stealing 33 peer sexual harassment Problems at School: 5 academic difficulty 4 Other Problems: general fears 15 nightmares, etc. 5 concern for someone ill 8 verbal harassment by other 5 growing up issues 7 substance use concerns 3 unwanted touching 6 unknown/ clear 2 fighting/crime in neighborhood 5 personal medical concerns 1 use of weaj??ns 5 ritualistic issues 1 ¡¡¡Il¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡I¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:~¡¡¡¡¡¡~~¡~¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡;¡I¡¡¡;¡Jmfm;Riî.i§¡:Wº:;§'~'Qf.¡g~::~mì~~i.Uw~i&Wª~i~?fuf~¡¡.p.1~tI~M¡~r¡¡:¡rfr~:r¡¡~~¡:¡¡¡¡r:¡¡:¡:r¡;¡;¡:¡¡¡~~¡:r:Ir¡~ Within Family: People at school: .......... ............................................ parent/primary caretaker 150 guidance counselor 143 sibling(minor) 46 teachers 109 grandparent 22 peer 64 other relatives(adult) 17 administration 23 other relatives(minor) 5 staff 14 Other people: peer mediation 4 peers 10 other school 2 neighbors 8 librarian 1 friend's parent 7 Professionals: 1.IIÙ<r()wn 6 law enforcement 6 babysitter 3 CPS 5 friend of the family 2 therapist 4 a~!\!lìî~9fl~~~_~E_+- teachers 81 child's mother 1 administration 14 child's sister 1 peer 4 CPS 1 physical · sibling problems lack of family communication divorce/separation issues scared of family member home alone arguing between parents domestic violence corporal punishment getting in "trouble" concerns about pet/animals death in the family 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 picked on/verbal abuse making friends bullying 29 7 5 issues with staff getting in "trouble" 3 · . Elementary CAP SY 94/95 TABLE 4: Summary of Adult Workshops Burruey Moran 1 50 0 Clark 1 22 4 Greenbriar 1 5 5 Jackson-Via 1 20 4 Johnson 1 11 0 Venable 1 27 0 ::',:f:1: ::,"':}' .~:.... BrownsvilIe 0.... Ot °t . Greer 1.... Ot °t Hollymead 0.... Ot It Red Hill 1 0 Scottsville 1 0 Stone-Robinson 1 3 Yanœ 1 0 . Jrªr.:I'@l@l%RitåWtmättŒwml@MHMm6.i~HMll:~¥:~riH~~mi$.:::@@M¡mRi~tmtdMmil:::WfiM.a.~$.:Mf~tl~tMltm\ttl@:: "City parents were invited to a joint Parent Workshop. ....Greer, Hollymead, and Brownsville parents were invited to a joint Parent Workshop at Greer. tStaff had previously participated in Inservice. tTeachers were given review material in writing. . . . B.P. YANCEY ELEMENTARY smOOL Office of the Prinåpal Route 1, Box 285 Esmont, Virginia '22937-9732 Telephone (804) 286-3768 November 10, 1994 Sexual Assault Resource Agency Ms. Bambi Chapin CAPP Coordinator P. O. Box 6705 Charlottesville VA 22906 Dear Ms. Chapin, Please let me take this opportunity to recognize you for the time, effort, and energy you put into implementing the CAP project here at Yancey. I was extremely impressed by the program. You and your team of facilitators put a great deal of care and thoughtful concern into the children's workshops. I felt the team members were well prepared and very comfortable with their role which is so important. They were thoughtfully presented and well received. Thank you for the time and care you and your team spent in following up with each child during "talk time." This time was very important to our children. My sense is that our students benefited from hearing how to keep safe, strong, and free. My hope is that we, as a school, will continue to empower them to do so. The message you bring is so essential in ensuring our children's health and happiness. I am impressed by your commitment to children and your strength as a child advocate. I thank you for your dedication to CAPP and to our school. I really enjoyed working with you and learning from you. Si cere y'f) .., ~l . \ r Jmt1A0W\U Jennif McCracken Parent Resource IITA T_ r__ ~ ("""I THE ALBEMARLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CORlDKAJLJL Y KNVKTE§ YOU AND OTHER MEMJßER§ OF YOUR ORGANKZATKON TO ATTEND - r A PUBLIC MEETING ~ ON "REVERSION: WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU AND ME" WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 16TH 7:00 P.M. AUD ITORIUM - 2ND FLOOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING 401 McINTIRE ROAD CHARLOTTESVILLE, VJIRG JINJIA REVERSION ISSUES TO BE DISCUSSED: * How it happens * What services will it impact, including schools * How it could affect your taxes Following the presentation, public comments and questions will be received. .~ David P Bowerman CharlottesvIlle COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296.5843:, FAX (804) 972-4060 Charles S Martm RIV<lIlrM Charlotte Y. Humphns Jack Jouell Walter F. Perkins Whife Hal1 Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. scotlSVlne Sally H. Thomas Sðmuel Miller August 10, 1995 Mr. Al Elias Chairman Charlottesville City School Board 1562 Dairy Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 Dear Mr. Elias: I would like to personally invite you and the other members of the Charlottesville City School Board to attend the County's Public Forum on reversion. The Public Forum will be Wednesday, August 16, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the auditorium on the second floor of the County Office Building. The:objective of the forum is to present information and have an open discussion by the public on reversion. We anticipate the impact on the educational systems in our community will be of particular interest. We invite everyone to attend, ask questions, and join the discussion. Please share my invitation with your fellow School Board members. We hope that you all will be able to attend. It is important that we hear the comments and concerns of the citizens of Charlottesville and Albemarle County on this important matter. Sincerely, /;j~ J ß-/~/(rL Walter F. Perkins Chairman WFP:rcs cc: Members of the County Board of Supervisors 94-208,006 * Printed on recycled paper DaVid-P. Bowerman Chðr10flesvllle COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 (804) 296.58431,1 FAX (804) 972-4060 Charles S. Martm RiVðnlM Charlotte Y. Humphns Jack Jouell Walter F. Perkins While Hdll Forrest R. Marshall. Jr. Scoftsville Sally H. Thomas Sdmue Miller August 10, 1995 Mr. William W. Finley Chairman Albemarle County School Board Route 1, Box 251 Free Union, Virginia 22903 Dear Bill: I would like to personally invite you and the other members of the School Board to attend the County's Public Forum on reversion. The Public Forum will be Wednesday, August 16, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. in the auditorium on the second floor of the County Office Building. The objective of the forum is to present information and have an open discussion by the public on reversion. We anticipate the impact on the educational systems in our community will be of particular interest. We invite everyone to attend, ask questions, and join the discussion. Please share my invitation with your fellow School Board members. We hope that you all will be able to attend. It is important that we hear the comments and concerns of the citizens of Charlottesville and Albemarle County on this important matter. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, W' a.i& j f2.¡~/ee- Walter F. Perkins Chairman WFP:rcs cc: Members of the County Board of Supervisors 94-208,007 * Printed on recycled paper · , D:s·rr~fblJ·¡··E!) TC) ~.,..~!\:¿,)., . >;;'1,--., ON-X.....'ç"'..· ."" --. . . -"-. ~~-_..._._.- PUBLIC FORUM AUGUST 16, 1995 REVERSION What it Means to You and Me Reversion is a legal process by which the City of Charlottesville can give up its independent city status and become a town within Albemarle County. The town of Charlottesville would become a part of Albemarle County and the County would assume the responsibility of providing certain services to town residents. Reversion can occur if ordered by the courts without citizen approval by referendum and notwithstanding any objections by the County. The process of reversion for Charlottesville is as follows: 1. City Council approves an ordinance to petition for town status or 15 percent of the registered voters in the city sign a petition stating that it is desirable that the city make the transition to town status. 2. The ordinance or petition is filed in Charlottesville Circuit Court. The Supreme Court of Virginia then selects three judges to serve as a special court to hear the case. 3. The special court refers the ordinance or petition to the Commission on Local Government for review, The Commission has up to eight months to hold hearings, listen to arguments from the City, the County and any intervenors, and issue a recommendation on whether reversion should occur, and if so on what terms and conditions. 4. The special court hears evidence and issues a decision on whether the city may become a town. The special court may impose such terms and conditions on the reversion as it deems appropriate. The special court may accept, reject or modify any of the terms and conditions recommended by the Commission on Local Government. 5. Any party to the case may appeal the special court's decision to the Virginia Supreme Court. The Supreme Court may accept the appeal, hear the case, and issue a decision, or it may reject the appeal and let the special court's decision stand. 6. If the final court action allows the City to revert, City Council has 21 days in which to decline to accept eligibility for town status. If City Council does not decline town status, reversion occurs. If City Council declines town status, or if the court rejects the petition, the city is barred for five years from seeking to revert again. 1 SCHOOLS TAXES REVENUE SHARING CITY EM- PLOYEES REVERSION What Does Reversion Affect? If the City and County school systems are consolidated, the school curriculum, funding and philosophy for town residents would be determined by the County School Board. However, the responsibility and funding for the Charlottesville school system could remain with the new town after reversion. The school systems may NOT be consolidated without the consent of the County. If the Charlottesville schools become the responsibility of the County, the County would likely consolidate the schools to reduce the current higher per student cost of education in the city. If the County were to fund a consolidated school district at the level of the City per-student funding, the County would have to raise more than $20 million in additional revenue through increased taxes or other means. If the two school systems are consolidated, it is a near certainty that Albemarle County residents would have to pay more taxes to provide the mandated services to the residents of Charlottesville. If the new town retained responsibility for Charlottesville schools, the town would face a $9 million deficit due to a loss of revenue to the County unless the town requires its citizens to pay higher combined taxes. Residents of the new town would have to pay County real and personal property taxes as well as any town real and personal property taxes. In addition, if the County is required to provide additional services to the town, the County would explore implementing special tax or service districts to require town residents to pay for those services. Pursuant to the 1982 Revenue Sharing Agreement between the City and the County, the County will pay the City in excess of $5 million of County tax revenue in 1995 for use by the City at its sole discretion. The average growth of the County payment to the City required by the Revenue Sharing Agreement has been 11.3% annually since 1982. If revenue sharing continues, it is projected the County would be obligated to pay the City more than $7.8 million in the year 2000 and $13.7 million in the year 2005. The Revenue Sharing Agreement is terminated upon the reversion of the City to town status. The County cannot be required to continue any revenue sharing agreement with the town as a condition of reversion. Many Charlottesville employees likely will lose their jobs as a result of their department being eliminated by reversion, including: all constitutional officers -- Commonwealth's Attorney, Sheriff, Treasurer, Commissioner of the Revenue, and Clerk of the Court -- and their deputies and employees; other employees of the Charlottesville court system; the Charlottesville Registrar and her employees; employees of the Charlottesville Department of Social Services; and, depending on what services the town relinquishes to the County, other employees of the City of Charlottesville. Some of those employees could be, but would not have to be, hired by the County to perform related services if provided by the County. 2 SOCIAL SERVICES OTHER SERVICES ANNEXA- TION RETURN TO CITY STATUS REGIONAL AGREE- MENTS DEBT . , Most social services provided by Charlottesville would come under the control of the County government. The County would then decide which services it will fund and which services would be eliminated as a result of Charlottesville giving up its independence. Other services that could be relinquished by the City to the County upon reversion include police, fire and rescue, parks and recreation, real estate assessment and building inspections. The special court would determine which services the County would be required to provide. The County would then determine what level of service it would provide to residents of the town in these areas. A new town of Charlottesville would have the authority to annex land from the County. Any County residents and businesses that become part of the new town would be subject to any taxes, regulations and ordinances imposed by the new town, including the meals tax and cigarette tax, as well as most County taxes, regulations and ordinances. The new town would almost certainly initiate annexation proceedings to acquire significant areas of the County. The County would almost certainly oppose such annexation. After reverting to town status, the town of Charlottesville would maintain its statutory right to petition to become a city again. Any property annexed by the town would remain part of the city. Any persons or businesses on such annexed property would then be subject to city taxes and laws rather than County taxes and laws. The County would lose those citizens and the tax base. A new town of Charlottesville could remain obligated to fund its share of all regional agreements, including the regional jail and landfill. The new town could not be an official member of the regional library system, but could be asked to support and fund library services within the town. The new town could continue to participate in the authorities which have been created jointly by the County and the City. Absent a court order to the contrary, the new town would remain liable for any debt, obligations and liabilities that were incurred when the town was a city. POLITICAL A new town of Charlottesville would become subject to the County political process. POWER Instead of being independent, the new town would be one small part of the whole county. Town residents would be included in County voting districts drawn by County Supervisors and would participate in the election of County Supervisors and members of the County School Board in the district in which they live. Town residents also would elect a town council in place of the current City Council. LEGAL COSTS The legal proceedings for reversion probably will last at least two years. Combined legal fees of the City and County resulting from reversion litigation could exceed a million dollars. 3 REVERSION A) CITYffOWN DISTINCTION: · Virginia is unique in the 50 states in that it is the only state with independent cities; · The other 49 states have cities and counties that share the underlying tax base: · Miami is part of Dade County · Charlotte is part of Mecklenburg County · Towns in Virginia are part of counties: · Town of Orange is part of Orange County · Scottsville is part of Albemarle County · Towns and counties share real estate/personal property tax base. B) PROCEDURE ON REVERSION: · City and citizens can initiate - City citizens only can initiate - 15% registered voters must sign petition to start proceedings; · File with Court - Court refers to Commission on Local Government for review; · COLG - 5 people experienced with local government; Mini trial Public hearing Report! Advisory · Then three judge court will hear and decide case. C) STATUTORY LAW: Legal Requirements: Criteria: · Change will not substantially impair counties ability to meet service needs of its citizens; · Change will not result in an inequitable sharing of resources and liabilities; · Balance equities is in best interest of City, County, state and citizens of City and County; · Best interest of state in promoting strong and viable government. REVERSION IMPACT ON CITY FINANCIAL OPERATIONS Based on Budget Year Ending June 30,1996 REVENUE LOSSES Property Taxes $ (17,925,000) (1,427,000) (5,050,000) 8,631,000 Local Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement Less: Statutory Tax Share for Schools Net Revenue Losses $ (15,771,000) EXPENDITURE REDUCTIONS Social Services (local) $ 1,376,000 Constitutional Officers & Courts (local) 1,091,000 Health and Mental Health 1,061,000 Libraries 908,000 Other Public Safety 715,000 1,480,000 Contributions & Other Net Expenditure Reductions $ 6,631,000 LOSS IF CHARLOTTESVILLE OPERATES SCHOOLS $ (9,140,000) · , REVERSION IMPACT ON CITY FINANCIAL OPERATIONS Based on Budget Year Ending June 30,1996 LOSS IF CHARLOITESVILLE OPERATES SCHOOLS $ Less Local School Taxes: Statutory Tax Share for Schools Local Sales Tax School Expenditure Reductions: Local Cost of City Schools (9,140,000) (8,631,000) (2,070,000) 23,534,000 GAIN IF COUNTY OPERATES ALL SCHOOLS $ 3,693,000 REVERSION IMPACT ON COUNTY FINANCIAL OPERATIONS Based on Budget Year Ending June 30,1996 REVENUE GAINS Property Taxes $ Local Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement Less: Statutory Tax Share for Schools Net Revenue Gains $ EXPENDITURE INCREASES Social Services (local) $ Constitutional Officers & Courts (local) Health and Mental Health Libraries Other Public Safety Contributions & Other Net Expenditure Increases $ GAIN IF CHARLOTTESVILLE OPERATES SCHOOLS $ 17,925,000 1,427,000 5,050,000 (8,631,000) 15,771,000 (1,376,000) (1,091,000) (1,061,000) (908,000) (715,000) (1,368,000) (6,519,000) 9,252,000 REVERSION IMPACT ON COUNTY FINANCIAL OPERATIONS Based on Budget Year Ending June 30,1996 GAIN IF CHARLOTTESVILLE OPERATES SCHOOLS $ Add Local School Taxes: Statutory Tax Share for Schools Local Sales Tax School Expenditure Increases: Local Cost of City Schools 9,252,000 8,631,000 2,070,000 (23,534,000) LOSS IF COUNTY OPERATES ALL SCHOOLS $ (3,581,000) CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE - TOWN REVERSION - GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES - IMPACT OF REVERSION A JUDICIAL · County assumes full · No proposed sharing of liabilities · Financial, administrative and political ADMINISTRATION responsibility for these functions . City portion of local funding burden on county increases must come from county, through Sheriff taxation or from Commonwealth . Circuit Court Clerk Space, equipment and personnel Commonwealth's needs for "Town" functions must Attorney be provided for B, FINANCES · County must assume · Records must be transferred · Loss of voter influence by fonner responsibility for property · City portion of local funding city residents Commissioner of assessments, state income tax must come from county, through · Financial, administrative and political Revenue returns, property tax collection taxation or from Commonwealth burden on County increases Treasurer · Space, equipment and personnel · Diminished level of representation needs for "Town" functions must for area residents be provided for · Fonner city residents will be taxed . Loss of City Commissioner of by county and town Revenue and Treasurers offices C. ELECfIONS · County assumes responsibility · Redistricting and special election - Political, fmancial and administrative for these functions likely necessary in county and burden on county increases Registrar town · Loss of fonner city citizen Board of Elections · Records must be transferred representation on Board of Elections · Loss of City Registrar's office · Personnel adjustments necessary · Space, equipment and personnel needs for "Town" functions D. SOCIAL SERVICES · County assumes full · Services must be scaled to meet · Financial, administrative and HEAL TII responsibility for these functions funding limits political burden on county increases and provides all local funding · City portion of local funding · Loss of fonner city citizen Welfare Board must come from county, through representation on welfare board taxation or from Commonwealth E. MENTAL HEALTII · County assumes full · City portion of local funding · Financial, administrative and SERVICES responsibility for funding must come from county, through political burden on county increases Community Services Board taxation or from Commonwealth Welfare Board · Services must be scaled to meet funding limits F. SOLID WASTE · "Town" would continue to use · No change · No impact Rivanna Solid Waste Authority Landfill G, URBAN SERVICES -Charlottesville will continue to · County cannot properly ·Administrative and political burden on provide: police; fire; water and coordinate its planning activities county increases sewer; planning; zoning and without some control over many of subdivision; solid waste these services collection; recreation and street ·No provision for resource/asset related services sharing H. PUBLIC -County assumes full ·Adjustment necessary to bring -Financial, administrative and political EDUCATION responsibility for operation of local standards of quality in line burden on county increases the educational systems -All school debt to county ·Personnel adjustments necessary e PLEASE SIGN UP BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK CONCERNING THE ISSUE OF REVERSION: 1 ';0 ¡ ,<43D 7,.J./ 2. 3. ! 56 1~ ì . 4. 7 ' ;/ 5D 5. <g .'0'3 6. v/ 7. -'J 0) <6':V~ 8. ~ )Þ <;:ör 10. '1 11: A ,../0 _ '6,{ 12. ~:j ~~ 13. ". r:-..1 14. ~:').'1 15. . 'J.~tr) '(, 16. . ( ; ,7- }.. r '£. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. -- 25. )"Ì' ~ ( .,.,................:) 'i":::~ / ,..",- \ (J 1'\::"_ ~ 'A) (jJ\AJ.M Va\\ ckJ \ - ' ,--~,_... \ ~. ,;"\ <:;.ç¡f.)L,.. í.. . --~~ ~" \ ¡ _'" J.k",,\ ... _,-' _ ".---. \. ,.- I 1-· ,.-, .." -'+ \, .."~ 't ~l--...~- ,-,J" '""., t ,: -....:~ ,,-- l /£to,,- -9. Q "Û L- / ,4l F (~~V('j'; . 'Y''} ¡ . " f- '",..;¡ . ( ¡' C. S""t { 'Z i;:.'-ir/ (: h ~ /" - -, ~ "- I'" . i/ . " . ! _ .; ~ " , ,;F o"., / A· ,10- , ,{ II?"..:' ,t' j 1::../' J' ./ . .ry ,,' I'" -' - - S /f2 Ii ð? 1!ÝÁ- I? S .?- A- {è ....\ J: j _--"} ...."'.,.. .. '.'~, ,,'''" . .,' ,.. ,.,~t... l..W- ~ !\ _ ~;,. -r-; \ 1\ j r:" ""., ;\/ :~> ,t' '1',,: Ú¡t.(lr WI í{PtW¡¿,rJj' . r" e ~o 'ß)<l 1. 10 i:.3Þ 2 . 1:3 1 If) 3 . s'o o ¡,¡;5 " . 4. 5. 6 . 7. 8. 9 . 10. 11. e 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. e 25. PLEASE SIGN UP BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK CONCERNING THE ISSUE OF REVERSION: , 1 IJ /'J ';:1/L Q,. r)1 ('(5--::> ¡,'- ~~iø~~ f;1~~~ t;¡ C'~~ ~p~ ~ ~A11AA- huu-~~ --- I ¡f) by ]) £., l;; /7 cl f?rrtv5t ~tJ./V . ~.j~ e PLEASE SIGN UP BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK CONCERNING THE ISSUE OF REVERSION: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. e 12. e 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 1. ¿~k£ ra¿4~ D!Sm::U r:e/j;~?h\8~R; ON _"_.c"l)I/JIP.¡~_._ 410 Second Street NE Charlottesville, VA 22902 August 11, 1995 5' Mr. Walter Perkins, Chairman Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Albemarle County Office Building Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Mr. Perkins: I appreciate your informal invitation to speak for five minutes, or so, at the Board of Supervisors public hearing August 16 about Charlottesville's possible reversion to town status. The purpose of the hearing seems to be to give others ample time to speak, so I suspect my participation would not be useful. If you and the other supervisors would like a more extended discussion about reversion some time, I would be glad to participate. I also would be pleased to discuss the subject individually with you or any of the supervisors. Sincerely, , 91:d1L~t\ 't~ William Lucy V , c-. ''.. . '..\.~ :.:...') S D:~.'íì'I"lJI·c~f1~l~~__:~_~ o! , ~.,_« _,-_.. 8-11-95 County of Albemarle County Office Building 401 Mcintire Road Charlottes vi 1 le, Virginia 22901 Attention: Mr. Walter F. Perkins, Chairman Board of Supervisors Re: Charlottesville Town Reversion Dear Chairman Perkins: Being that I am a resident of the Keswick community of Albemarle County, and have been for several years, I have been reading with much interest the various newspaper articles as they perta1n to the possibility of the City of Charlottesv11le reverting to a town, thereby causing certain services (i.e., schools?) to be assumed by the County and per Virginia Code 15.1-965.9 - 15.1-969.27. From my admittedly biased perspective, it is unfortunate the law permits this reversion without the county being able to stop it, unless it would unduly burden the county in being able to provide adequate services to its populace or would cause an inequity in the sharing of resources and liabilities. Should Charlottesville revert to a town, I have every expectation that the taxes on the county's residents would have to be raised (which, believe, historically occurs) in order to reasonably meet these additional services. Somehow, all of this strikes me as being tilted strongly (and unfairly) in the favor of the city folks. However, my mission here is not to bellyache, but to offer a thought on what the county might initiate as a deterrent. I do not know how contentious any future discussions may become between the city and county about this, and what I have to suggest may greatly anger the city. My idea has to do with the jail (Jo1nt Security Complex). As you are aware, this fac11ity 1S a re~1oJ:ìa1 ja11. However, I believe that should the city become a town, the ja1l would become a local one for Albemarle County and come under the author1ty of the sheriff. It is my contention that should this happen, Albemarle County could then charge the Town of Charlottesville per d1em for holding its pr1soners brought to the Jail by the town ºQll~~. Current ly, I bel ieve that Cnarlottesv1 ì Ie's 1nmates comprise about 60% of the total prisoners at the jail who have been arrested on a state warrant. If the state warranted prisoner population is about 180 (that should be close, as it excludes federals), then Charlottesville has about 108 of that number. Page 2 Their current per diem to outslde 10callties is $35 (I thlnk), so if Albemarle County could charge th1s, then the clty would have to pay $113,400 per month or about $1.36 milllon per year! Further, any federal per d1em charges would go to the county. Candidly, I am outraged that the clty would attempt to pul 1 something like this "threat" of town reversion. However, if what I have suggested above is allowable, and would be put into action, then perhaps it might make the city rethink its position? Some might say that this is hitting below the belt, but to protect the citizens of the county, I say go for it. I f what the city can do is 1 ega 1, then what you can do is sanctioned per the Code (53.1-91) also. I write this letter solely as a private citizen of Albemarle County who believes that my family and I will be adversely affected should this reversion take place. I am not an attorney nor do I even remotely profess to be one, but probably as you can guess, I am involved in community based corrections and have been for almost two decades, and now work outside the area. Although I am reluctant to use the jail as a pawn, if politics are to be played, then play to win as our future well being depends upon it! Your kind attention to the above 1S appreciated. Respectfu liy, /scp Steri1ng C. Proffltt 3795 Whitetai ¡ Lane Keswick, VA 22947 Tel: 804 - 9 '17 - '7 8 9 2 8elUt~~ ~4..d C¡IV)~l'f¿, JlLdiI VA- 2 "Z.-703- ,,/702. ! 119S( Cluf"DY /0.. ) lJ?r "1¿. ~.J~ '&~/ c>itU4'",,~ . alk~tM& ~.i ('~'tLr~~~ C~~ ð~~ ~1CteJ~ eltt:V7 ti~'Zli.L.&J VJf- 22. 9ð J ~44.. ~. V'~! :~~:~"liiJ"'5J;1JþZL .~,:.~ ~ ~~ éL ~/¡/Jt::I.#7V ¿J)lA ~. 9- eLl cUL . ~Þv ....:- æ i.uu4A.- ~ ~ ~ ,(¿U)~ I~ ~ A-h7u yrt:) (j~' dÁt e~ ~14h~ ~ a..I~ /ðl..~ a. ~e:- .T¡!J~.ú ~ 7M~þ~, ~¡.. ~ Yl:c.~, W~ C!JÆ.cA~~vd..t.L ed:t/ ~~nnu..Jr ~~ l~ ti~t241- ~~ ~V- ~~tq ;ft'X;;:: YJ;:;:t:d:::-~- ~r.-L- l!.ë 7t1~ C~_~ ó-L- ~~~~ 7U'Þ1_~_ :;;:~Zt;4:~;:j ~ ~d~ ttJ:a. uP~ fÞ~' c7¿~ · r - 2. Lv dt! ~ 0'ü'I'M.. X..¡ a.-tJ ~ .,¿ tL.-2.~ ~~ t01t.ö CiA.O all..LL ./.ü;~ wid -u.Øf ~ . ~ ~dIcA. rt'k ~~,t!J~. ðc ¿~~d. ~ a.Úe t:!~ -6 ~;;/"- F I"~u.-/ a. Zt/tL/L~ atHl. Iðe- ~ diu ~~~ ió ~ Ui~ ~ CJ~~ðt¡1 ~ .4JdW>t'Zõum-m~.I ~ ~.nwt; LJV 6J>. ~ ~L¥ ~ ~ ~ .Jk;.(J.~~ ~~~l~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ¿/2-D..L- / ðA- <2..-. ~ ~ £J).(..,v ~. ). MJy ~ JçÞ~--(~ 'M .h~ tf'~¿t-~ ð-r::..of- ~ 1(/tW ~ " tP~. ú?lf.,.::f 9 ¿ ~ -d,¿ c4 tv iLl {J ¡ ~ "-- ~ ¿t:¿ ~ cud- L -ux-.. ~ ~a/L-- t$". /" ç' . -<'1'~~, . ~ ¿r, \ ( ~ - ;1ruJ;5I, L"-tJ Oistributed to [)(¡ard' '8 ~ It. J.J.s:- Agendl item rio. -.9.5P&' /b ' 638 David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 972·4060 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsvîlle Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Board of Supervisors " FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMc-{)Á..F-- DATE: August 11, 1995 SUBJECT: Reading List for August 16, 1995 June 2, 1993 - pages 1 - 13 - Mr. Perkins ",' t~LL (fVt A~ t\d c',"-, . 11, 1995 - Mr. Martin ,- ,3a..cL UV\ '~Ld.t'- 1995 - Mr. Marshall ~Þ{OtDkcV6(pp(dV.eJj ~/({pI'1);' January June 14, EWC:mms * Printed on recycled paper e-ec-eiv-e.J.~ r /1 Þ! r¡s- AUGUST 16, 1995 EXECUTIVE SESSION MOTION I MOVE THAT THE BOARD GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 2. I -344(A) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA UNDER SUBSECTION (7) TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND STAFF REGARDING SPECIFIC LEGAL MAlTERS CONCERNING REVERSION.