HomeMy WebLinkAboutZMA198900018 Action Letter
"'e
rr.
~.
'.
ZMA gCf -18
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Char!ot:esville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5823
Ja~uary 22, 1990
Gaylon Beights
246 East High Str~et
C~arlottesville, VA 22901
RE: Z¡1A-89-18 Reàfields Development
Tax Map 76, Parce:s 21A~ 22A, 23, 243, 47, and 49
De~r Mr. Beights:
The Albe~arle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on
Ja~~ary 17, 199C, unanimously approv~d t~e above-noted
re~~est to reZOTIe 276 acres from R-l, ~esidential to PRD,
P'~~-o~ Res~a'e-~l'~l ~ovo'~P~°!1~ ~esul~~-~;- 6~6 '~ts
.....c...LJ.:.~.__ ..L .....'- <.,¡"...... J..J_ ,-.J..o.J .I.I..L"=_ '-,. -_J..I."=i __4.1 oJ J..u .
Property, located aèjacent to Sherwood Farms, and bounded by
S~~set Road an¿ 1-64.
T~e Board approved Z~ß-89-:8 subject to the co~ditions as
a~e~ded, and ~ddendum as reco~~e~ded DY the Planning
C0~~ission; as pro==ered in a letter dated December 3 1989,
t~ Wayne Cili~~erg signed ~y FraTIk D. cox, ùr., verbally
veri~ied by t~e appli=ant before the Beard on January 17,
and deleting proffer #4 in said letter. ~~e conditions as
reco~¿ended are set out below:
1. 3ac~ lot shall comply with c~~ren~ ~~ilding site
:;;::r071.S1.0:15. No drive~,.;ay shall encroach mo~e than 50
:ineal feet on slopes of 25% or greater.
2.
All roads wit~ the exception of roads A and B and the
private road to serve lot 106 shall be built to
Virginia Depart~ent of Transportation (VDOT) standards
fo= urban cross section and placed in the Secondary
System at time of develop~ent of those residential
areas utilizing those roads. Roads A and B shall be
constructed in accordance with VDOT standards for rural
cross section and placed in the Secondary System at the
time of development of the residential areas utilizing'
those roads.
.
.
.
--
--. .--...,.
Gaylon Beights
Page 2
January 22, 1990
f)
;~. Not more than 276 "dwelling units will be constructed
until such time as the Rt. 631 improvements have been
completed to the satisfaction of the Department of
Planning & community Development;
4. The proposed recreation center shall be constructed
with Phase 1;
5. There shall be only single family detached dwellings
south of road L.
6. Future lots will have limited access to roads A and B
in accordance with Engineering comments in attached
memorandum (Attachment A) dated Decem~er 19, 1989;
7. Acceptanc2 of applicant's proffers 1, 2, and 3 found in
Attachment D which read:
.....
A reduction in total residential units from 867 to
656 dwellings;
A reduction in gross residential density from 3.14
to 2.38 units/acre; and
A maximum neighborhood density not to exceed 4.0
units/acre in any given residential neighborhood
or developmer.t phase.
~.
2.
3.
8. Compliar.ce 7:1i th ccndi tions of addendum as follows: A
revised applicatio~ plan in accordance with section
8.5.3 of t~e Zoning Crdina~ce is reçùired and shall
i~c:ude the =ollowing:
1.
Setbacks for single family detached lots shall be
25 feet front setback, 15 feet side setback and 20
feet rear setback. (Note side setback may be
reduced to not less than six feet in accordance
with section 4.11.3.1) This shall be noted on the
plan on Page 1 note 9b;
Note on the plan that only single family detached
units will be located south of road L. A 20-foot
strip of common open space shall .be provided
adjacent to Tax map 76, Parcel 49B. The open
space strip shall include a landscape easement to
allow for Tax Map 76, Parcel 49B, to install
screening trees. A 20-foot rear setback shall
extend from the open space/landscape strip;
~
2.
t.;.\
.
f:ì'
.
r"" .
Gaylon Beights
Page 3
January 22, 1990
3. Revise the following notes on page one:
a. Remove RPc and replace with PRD in note 9b;
b. Note 1.1. must delete the following "and shall
conform with Virginia Department of Transportation
(VDOT) residential subdivision street design
standards in effect as of the date of PRD
Development Plan approval."
c. Delete Note 19. Staff does not support
administrative approval of the final plats or site
plans. Staff does request administrative approval
of the final sUbdivision plats for Lots 1 through
104.
d. Revisa land use notes to include Phase 6 as Open
Space;
e. Total number of lots is 656, not 658;
4. Remov9 all preliminary plat notes found on s~eet 5a,
and 9;
5.
Revise the following notes on sheet 9:
a. Note 2 in water and sewer schematic locations must
refer to the Albemarle County Service Authority
and not County standards; and
~. Total ~umber of lots is 656, not 658;
;5.
Note 2 in #ater and sewe~ schematic locations must
refer to the Al~emarle County Se~ýice Aut~ority and not
Cou~ty s~an~ards as foun~ on sheets 10, 11, and 12;
<-9.
No access Î=om Redfields through Sherwood Farms
SUbdivision.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the
above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
?Jð1~elY' ¿¡~
v. Wayn Cilimberg
Direct of Plan~ Community
vwc/jcw
Development
cc: Kathy Dodson
Richard Moring
Jeff Echols
Frank Cox
I
! .
' . ' þ
-
,- " ",
. . ...
..... ......... 11-.
.
THE COX COMPANY
Planners . Landscape Architects
Civil Engineers' Urban Designers
December 3,1989
Mr. Wayne Cilimberg
Director of Planning
The County of Albemarle
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 2290 1
Re: The Redfields Residential Community
PRD Zoning Application Revision
Samuel Miller District/Albemarle County, Virginia
Dear Wayne:
As you know, our office submitted on October 23 the Redfields residential
community zoning application for a change of use from the R- 1 district to the R-
4 and R- 1 0 districts. Pursuant to our meeting this past Monday, we have
attempted to incorporate the recommendations by Staff addressing the initial
zoning submission package. In this regard, this correspondence serves to
formally amend the Redfields zoning request to seek a PRD, Planned
Residential Development district to overlay the entire 276-acre tract. Thus, the
PRD district will substitute for the R-4 and R- 1 0 districts in our current application.
The significant aspects of this amended application which incorporates Staff
recommendations and the PRD concept are as follows:
1. A reduction in total residential units from 867 to 656 dwellings.
2. A reduction in gross residential density from 3.14 to 2.38
units/acre.
3. A maximum neighborhood density not-to-exceed 4.0
units/acre in any given residential neighborhood or
development phase.
4. A commitment not to construct more than 276 dwelling units
prior to the completion of VDOT's 5th Street extension project,
which is scheduled to commence July, 1991 with an
anticipated completion of November, 1992.
We agree with you that the PRD zoning approach affords a greater
opportunity to establish a general development plan for Redfields which is fully
compatible with the Jefferson Park Avenue/Fontaine Avenue Neighborhood
study and subsequent Comprehensive Plan Amendment adoptions by the
County. In this regard, I believe our recommended PRD development plan
804 . 295 . 7131
220 East High Street
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901
~,
. ì
.
.
, " ",
. . ...
.... ....... II"
Mr. Wayne Cilimberg
Decem ber 3, 1989
Page Two
establishes an environmentally sensitive land use approach while adhering to
the range of County planning goals for this area.
Our new PRD Development Plan responds to the major directives of the
original LOR study for the Miller Tract (Parcels D 1 and D2): Existing steep slopes
and vegetation have been preserved, low density has been allocated to the
westerly sector of the site, medium density has been organized near the
easterly sector and close to road access, and the LOR recommendation for a
"planned unit development with mixed density" has been followed.
In light of these considerations, we feel that the Redfields proposal is consistent
with the County's visions for this sector of the Urban Area. For your review and
continued input, I am forwarding a copy of the POR Development Plan and
pertinent conditions relating to this proposal.
As additional comments and concerns arise, please keep my advised. We
are deeply interested in seeking Commission action on this matter at their first
meeting of the New Yea,r and your assistance in this pursuit will be deeply
appreciated.
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me at on November 27. With warm
regards, I am
attachments.
fdcjr/ac
xc: Gaylon Beights
Percy Montague, IV
Bill Fritz
REDFIELDS PRD DEVELOPMENT PLAN
1. Tract Size: 275.97 Acres
2. Existing Zoning: R-l
3. Proposed Zoning: PRD-Planned Residential Development
(See Zoning Application dated October 23.1989)
Ben M. Miller and Percy Montague. III (Trustees)
Gaylon Beights and Percy Montague. IV (Trustees)
246 East High Street Charlottesville. Va 22901
TM 76; Parcels 49.47. 24B. 23. 22A and 21A.
Samuel Miller
DB 304. Page 381 and DB 430. Page 371.
Residential Dwellings with Mixed Density
(A).Suburban Residential Neighborhoods
Single Family Detached Dwellings.
109.34 Gross Acres.
Maximum Gross Density: 2.0 DU/Acre
PRD Plan Yield: 105 Residential Lots
Minimum SFD Lot Size: 10.000 SF
Min. Setbacks: 25' front. 20' rear. 15' side.
(B). Cottage & Attached Residential Neighborhoods
166.63 Gross Acres.
9 tracts proposed with development use and
density subject to conditions of RPC Zoning.
final. and preliminary plan approvals. as required.
Maximum Gross Density: 4.0 DU/ Aore
PRD Plan Yield: 551 Residential Units
Minimum SFD Lot Size: 5000 SF
Min SFD Setbacks: 10' front. 10' rear. O' side
Minimum Attached Lot Size: NR
Min Attached Setbacks: NR
10. Public Utilities: Public water and sewer available to property.
11. Transportation: All roads Indicated hereon are planned 50' public rights-of-way to
be dedicated to the Virginia Department of Transportation. Specific road
classifications (ROW. pavement width. construction sections and preliminary grades)
are depicted on Sheet 13. 14. 15. and 16 and shall conform with VDOT residential
subdivision street design standards as of date of PRD Development Plan approval.
12. The General Development Plan/Preliminary Plat indicated hereon is subject to PRD
zoning approval by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors for the subject property.
13. Average Suburban Residential Lot Size (Parcels 1-104): 17 .939 SF/Lot
14. Average Paroel Size (Parcels 105-115): 19.80 Aores
15. Linear Feet of Pavement in Public Rights-of-Way: 11.200 Feet (Roads M A·-·K·)
16. Area in Public Rights-of-Way: 13.50 Acres (Roads "A·-·K·)
17. Boundary plat data and acreage taken from surveys by William Roudabush. Jr..
CLS; dated April 5. 1967 and April 11. 1967.
18. Topographic mapping taken from aerial photogrammetric topography prepared
by Photo Science.lnc.. March 24. 1974.
19. Final subdivision plats and final plans for land developed in conformance with the
PRD General Development Plan is subject only to Staff review and approvals and shall
require no further approval by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors.
20. The subject property is not in an Albemarle County public water supply watershed.
21. No more than 276 dwellings will be constructed prior to the construction of the 5th
Street Extension project by VDOT.
";
, " ",
. . ...
.... ....... I''''
4.
5.
Owners:
Contract Owners:
6.
7.
8.
9.
Tax Map Reference:
Magisterial District:
Deed Reference:
PRD Planned Land Uses:
.
.
~~-
I ., ......,
. . ...
.... ....... II"
.
REDFIELDS RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY:
PRD Residential Land Use and Phasing
.
Phase/
Planned land Use
Phase 1:
Suburban SFD Residential
Cottaoe and Attached Residential
Phase 2:
Suburban SFD Residential
Cottaoe and Attached Residential
Phase 3:
Suburban SFD Residential
Cottaoe and Attached Residential
Phase 4:
Suburban SFD Residential
Cottaoe and Attached Residential
Phase 5:
Suburban SFD Residential
CottaQe and Attached Residential
Phase 6:
Suburban SFD Residential
Cottaoe and Attached Residential
Total Planned Residences:
Suburban SFD Residential
CottaQe and Attached Residential
Total Residences:
Total PRD Land Area
Suburban SFD Residential
Cottaoe and Attached Residential
Total Residential
PRD Residential Densities
Suburban SFD Residential Density
Cottaoe and Attached Residential Densitv
Total Redfields PRD Density
Planned
Residences
38
00
118
13
44
57
36
23
129
18
.85
100
o
~
154
o
25
95
1Œ
~
6fX)
109.34 ac.
166.63 ac.
275.97 ac.
0.96 DUlAC
3.31 DUlAC
2.38 DUlAC