HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-09-06
F I HAL
9:00 A.M.
Septeaber 6, 1995
Rooe 241, County Office Building
1) Call to Order.
2) Pledge of Allegiance.
3) Moment of Silence.
4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
5) Consent Agenda (on next sheet).
6) Approval of Minutes: June 2, 1993; January 11, March 15 (N), June 28
and August 9, 1995.
7) Transportation Matters:
a) Improvements to Moormans River and Sugar Hollow Road, Report on.
b) Route 29 Western Bypass Press Conference Report.
c) Whitewood Road Bus Stop, Report.
d) Abandonment of Old Route 606, Request for.
e) Other Transportation Matters.
8) 10:00 a.m. - Review County Engineer's decision, reI Coleman-Adams Soil
Erosion Permit.
9) 10:30 a.m. - Public Bearing to consider an ordinance amending and
reordaining Chapter 4, Section 4-19(a), to add subsection (35) to
include Peacock Hill Subdivision as one of those areas where dogs
are prohibited from running at large.
10) Tax-exempt Status, UVA Properties and Foundations, Discussion.
11) Site Review Process, Discussion.
12) Juvenile Detention Needs, Secure Assessment of.
13) 11:00 a.m. - Request to set public hearing to amend the Albemarle County
Service Authority service area boundaries for water only to
existing structures for Clifton, The Country Inn.
14) Solid Waste Alternatives.
15) Executive Session: Personnel (Boards & Commission applications)
and Disposition of Real Property.
16) Certify Executive Session.
17) Adoption of a Resolution regarding Section 5-3 of the County Code to
eliminate all permit and inspections related fees for projects
owned by Albemarle County or Albemarle County School~.
18) Shooting near Residences (Review of Policy Options for Prohibiting
Discharging of Firearms near or adjacent to Populated Areas).
19) Year End Adjustments and Reappropriations: General Fund Operations and
Capital Improvements Program.
20) Executive Session: Legal Matters.
21) Certify Executive Session.
22) Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
23) Adjourn.
CON S E N T
AGENDA
FOR APPROVAL:
,
5.1 Proclamation proclaiming October as Domestic Violence Awareness Month.
5.2 Resolution request that Emerald Ridge Subdivision roads be taken into
the State System of Secondary Roads.
5.3 Request Resolution of Intent to set a public hearing for October 4,
1995, to amend Chapter 8, Article 1, In General, of the Code of
Albemarle, in Section 8-1.3(a) reI Split Billing of Real Estate Taxes.
5.4 Appropriation Reauests:
a) Metropolitan Planning Organization Grant, $48,625 (Form #95011).
b) Community Crime Prevention Grant, $20,275 (Form #95012).
c) Housing Assistance Payment Program, $1,413,393 (Form #95013).
d) Soil and Water Conservation, $10,754.52 (Form #95014).
e) Teensight, $14,000.
f) Public Safety Grant, $10,388.17 (Form #95019).
g) Lambs Road Project, $6,810 (Form #95020).
h) Old Brook Road Pathway, $6,686 (Form #95021).
i) Miscellaneous School Grants, $14,198.64 (Form #95022).
j) Education - Auto Stipend for Superintendent, $1000 (Form #95023).
FOR INFORMATION:
5.5 Copy of Planning Commission minutes for August 1 and August 22, 1995.
5.6 Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.) Bond Program Report and
Monthly Report for July, 1995.
5.7 Copy of ABG Financial Services, Inc., Monitoring Report for Arbor Crest
Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.).
5.8 Letter dated August 22, 1995, from A. G. Tucker to Ella W. Carey, Clerk,
re: Current Projects Construction Schedule.
5.9 Copy of minutes of the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority for June 26, 1995.
5.10 Copy of minutes of the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority for July 10, 1995.
5.11 Copy of letter dated August 11, 1995, from the Commonwealth Department of
Education addressed to Kevin C. Castner, Superintendent noting approval of
a Title I, Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 grant in the amount of
$550,000. This grant is for Educationally Deprived Children.
5.12 Letter dated August 25, 1995, from Thomas J. Bliley, Jr., to Ella W. Carey,
Clerk, reI the James Madison Commemorative Coin Act and a letter he sent to
fellow Representatives urging them to support this Act.
5.13 Copy of letter dated August 23, 1995, from Julie L. Vosmik, Virginia
Department of Historic Resources, addressed to Mrs. F. Palmer Weber,
advising that Malvern, Albemarle County, was entered on the National
Register of Historic Places on August 4, 1995.
5.14 Letter dated August 25, 1995, from the Honorable George Allen addressed to
the Honorable Walter F. Perkins, re: Self-Employment Microenterprises.
5.15 Copy of the 1995-1996 Work Plans for the County Development departments.
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
MEMORANDUM
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hal!
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
TO:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
Ella W. Carey, Clerk f.dt ~ d"'Ø.t'p
.A-V
September 7, 1995
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board Actions of September 6, 1995
The following is a list of actions taken by the Board of Supervisors at its
meeting on September 6, 1995:
Agenda Item No.1. Call to Order. Called to order at 9:01 a.m.
Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
Mr. John Pollock was present to mention the request from the Batesville Ruritan
Club. This will be placed on an agenda at the request of staff.
Item 5.1. Proclamation proclaiming October as Domestic Violence Awareness
Month. Approved.
Item 5.2. Resolution request that Emerald Ridge Subdivision roads be taken
into the State System of Secondary Roads. Adopted. Copy sent to Engineering
Item 5.3. Request Resolution of Intent to set a public hearing for October
4, 1995, to amend Chapter 8, Article 1, In General, of the Code of Albemarle, in
Section 8-1.3(a) reI Split Billing of Real Estate Taxes. Approved public
hearing. Will put on October 4, 1995, agenda.
Item 5. 4a. Appropriation Request:
Grant, $48,625 (Form #95011). Approved.
Breeden.
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Appropriation form sent to Melvin
Item 5.4b. Appropriation Request: Community Crime Prevention Grant,
$20,275 (Form #95012). Approved. Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden.
Item 5.4c. Appropriation Request: Housing Assistance Payment Program,
$1,413,393 (Form #95013). Approved. Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden.
*
Printed on recycled paper
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
September 7, 1995
(Page 2)
Item 5.4d. Appropriation Request: Soil and Water Conservation, $10,754.52
(Form #95014). Approved. Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden.
Item 5.4e. Appropriation Request: Teensight, $14,000. Approved. An
appropriation form will need to be requested from Melvin Breeden.
Item 5.4f. Appropriation Request: Public Safety Grant, $10,388.17 (Form
#95019). Approved. Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden.
Item 5.4g. Appropriation Request: Lambs Road Project, $6,810 (Form
#95020). Approved. Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden.
Item 5.4h. Appropriation Request: Old Brook Road Pathway, $6,686 (Form
#95021). Approved. Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden.
Item 5.41. Appropriation Request: Miscellaneous School Grants, $14,198.64
(Form #95022). Approved. Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden.
Item 5. 4j . Appropriation Request: Education Auto Stipend for
Superintendent, $1000 (Form #95023). Approved. Appropriation form sent to
Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 7a. Transportation Matters: Improvements to Moormans
River and Sugar Hollow Road, Report on. Staff was requested to ask VDOT to pause
in any further work on Route 614 in Sugar Bollow until a meeting such as that
recommended by Mrs. Thomas and Mr. Marshall takes place and all the players
gather and have a serious discussion of the background and of the future. Need
to pause and get group together before move forward and then as a separate issue
find out what happened, how that process took place, and what can be done about
it in the future.
Agenda Item No. 7b. Transportation Matters: Route 29 Western Bypass Press
Conference Report. A letter is to be sent to the Commonwealth Transportation
Board and Secretary Martinez telling them in no uncertain terms that Albemarle
County does not want any further study of interchanges on the Western Bypass, the
bypass should remain a bypass.
Agenda Item No. 7c. Transportation Matters: Whitewood Road Bus Stop,
Report. Board will take no further action relative to this bus stop until budget
work session time next spring.
Agenda Item No. 7d. Transportation Matters: Abandonment of Old Route 606,
Request for. The Board will take official action to abandon this route when the
new section is ready to be added. Request will come from the Highway Department.
Agenda Item No. 7e. Other Transportation Matters. Mr. Marshall made his
request for stop signs at the bottom of the ramp coming off of 1-64 going south
on Route 20 in the vicinity of Piedmont College.
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
September 7, 1995
(Page 3)
Agenda Item No.8. Review County Engineer's decision, reI Coleman-Adams
Soil Erosion Permit. DENIED APPEAL.
Agenda Item No.9. Public Hearing to consider an ordinance amending and
reordaining Chapter 4, Section 4-19(a), to add subsection (35) to include Peacock
Hill Subdivision as one of those areas where dogs are prohibited from running at
large. Adopted attached ordinance.
Agenda Item No. 10. Tax-exempt Status, UVA Properties and foundations,
Discussion. Received report.
Agenda Item No. 11. Site Review Process, Discussion. Received report.
Agenda Item No. 12. Juvenile Detention Needs, Secure Assessment of. The
Board approved sending a letter to the Jail Board suggesting the Jail Board start
discussions on the possibility of having the Juvenile Detention Facility on the
jail site, subject to the decision on October 11, 1995, by the State Department
of Youth and Family Services.
Agenda Item No. 13. Request to set public hearing to amend the Albemarle
County Service Authority service area boundaries for water only to existing
structures for Clifton, The Country Inn. Set public hearing for October 4, 1995.
Agenda Item No. 14. Solid Waste Alternatives. Received.
Not Docketed: Appointments.
Housing Committee
Beverly Dee Tirrell
Karen Lilleleht
Frances Lee-Vandell
JAUNT
Chris L. Daschbach
Albemarle-Charlottesville Joint Airport Commission
Reappoint Stephen Ayers
Jordan Development
Reappoint Lisa Keyes Glass
Reappoint Jerry E. Jones
Land Use Classification Appeals Board
Reappoint Fred W. Shields, Jr.
Monticello Area Community Action Agency -
Appoint Robert H. Hodge, Jr.
Public Recreational Facilities Authority
Reappoint Timothy Lindstrom
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
September 7, 1995
(Page 4)
Regional Disability Services Board
Reappoint Karen Morris
Reappoint Thomas J. Jakubowski
Reappoint Mrs. Elsie T. Fryer
Rivanna Solid Waste Authority - Citizens Advisory Committee
Appoint David Booth
Reappoint John K. Pollock
Thomas Jefferson Housing Improvement Corporation
Reappoint Bruce K. Kirtley
Solid Waste Task Force
Ralph E. Allen
Laurel Elizabeth Royse
Richard W. Morton
Agenda Item No. 17. Adoption of a Resolution regarding Section 5-3 of the
County Code to eliminate all permit and inspections related fees for projects
owned by Albemarle County or Albemarle County Schools. Adopted the attached
resolution.
Agenda Item No. 18. Shooting near Residences (Review of Policy Options for
Prohibiting Discharging of Firearms near or adjacent to Populated Areas). staff
is to draft specific language for an ordinance and return it to the Board for
further discussion before the Board considers holding a public hearing.
Agenda Item No. 19. Year End Adjustments and Reappropriations: General
Fund Operations and Capital Improvements Program. Approved all requests. All
forms sent to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 20. Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
Approved sending the finalized draft "Preliminary Recommendations for the
Delivery of Long-Term Care Services at the Local Level" to the Advisory Committee
on Aging Disability and Long Term Care Services.
Agenda Item No. 23. Adjourned at 4:52 p.m.
EWC/len
Attachments (19)
cc: Richard E. Huff
Roxanne White
Jo Higgins
Larry Davis
File
..
PROCLAMATION
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH
WHEREAS, in the Commonwealth of Virginia, 29,805 women and 8,640 children sought domestic violence
services from July, 1993 to June, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the Albemarle community is committed to restoring the right to freedom from fear in our own
homes; and
WHEREAS, in our quest to impose sanctions on those who break the law by perpetrating violence, we must
also meet the needs of battered women and their children who often suffer grave financial,
physical and psychological losses; and
WHEREAS, the crime of domestic violence violates an individual's privacy, dignity, security and humanity;
and
WHEREAS, the impact of domestic violence is wide-ranging, directly affecting women and children and
society as a whole, crossing all economic, racial and societal boundaries;
NOW: THEREFORE,
in recognition of the important work being done by domestic violence
programs, I, Walter F. Perkins, Chairman, on behalf of the Albemarle Board
of County Supervisors, do hereby proclaim the month of
OCTOBER, 1995,
as
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH
and urge all citizens to actively participate in the scheduled activities and
programs sponsored by the Shelter for Help in Emergency to work toward the
elimination of personal and institutional violence against women.
Signed and sealed this 6th day of September, 1995.
CHAIRMAN
ALBEMARLE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS
The Board of County supervisors of Albemarle County, Virgin-
ia, in regular meeting on the 6th day of September, 1995, adopted
the following resolution:
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, the streets in Emerald Ridge Subdivision described
on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated September 6, 1995,
fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle
County, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department
of Transportation has advised the Board that the streets meet the
requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements
of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of
County Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transpor-
tation to add the roads in Emerald Ridge Subdivision as described
on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated September 6, 1995,
to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229,
Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision street Re-
quirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and
unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary
easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the
recorded plats; and
FURTHER'RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be
forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
* * * * *
Recorded vote:
Moved by: Mrs. Humphris.
Seconded by: Mr. Bowerman.
Yeas: Mr. Marshall, Mr. Martin, Mr. Perkins, Mrs. Thomas,
Mr. Bowerman and Mrs. Humphris.
Nays: None.
A Copy Teste:
~~~
Ella W. Carey, c1 rk, CMC
~
s::
"- ;j
0
U
tf.I
:>4
~ Ll\ ....
Ø\ 0
t!} \D
H Ø\ ""-
:t: '0
rzI
.oJ
E-I '" Q
~ Q .oJ .....
E-I R ..
tf.I ~ C1I
.oJ a
IZc R U Q
0 '" .Q
§ .oJ
.oJ .....
~ 1-1 I( ~
.oJ
E-I m
tf.I R
:>4 H
>-
.oJ
:>4
1-1
~ ;:I
<f.I
~ 0
0
U
rzI R
tf.I 0
""
rzI .oJ
;:I
:t: .-4
E-I 0
m s::
0 I>: 0
E-I -,.¡
m III
1-1 -,.¡
Z 0 >
m
"" -,.¡
H t
E-I
H §'
Q
~ <f.I
....
Q 0
rzI '0
1-1
'"
0
III
III
>. a
.-4
R
0
s::
R
0 0
.,.¡
,I( III
U .,..¡
>
.d
~ .,.¡
'tI
0 '§
.oJ
tf.I
.oJ
R I ..
H 0
E-I ~
H U Q
Q '" 9
.oJ
~ .oJ
I( z
1-
M - :>
- is
~ V1
"" - 0
«
2- - 0
'"
-< jiÞ"
;¡;- III!:Iíi ~
do z
en 0
Ë ~
.£ V1
.d
.u
01 m
¡::
..::I ....
...
R ~
0
...
.oJ R
""""
'0....
'0 1-1 Il'I
I(
.u '<I'
R ., g
'" .
u 0 .,; 0
m Q
t:n
.oJ ... ... C1I
0 Q
:zoo '" '"
"- "- .....
0 0
m .... ., .... -,.¡
;:I ., "- "- ::fJ
0 I ., Ii .,
u U u .....
R G G
· .. · .. C1I
'" · ·
.... .. ., .. .. ~
.... G 7 G 7 0
.. ... .. ... E-I
u · ·
m A .. A ..
... .. ... ..
"" · ·
~ H ... H :::
'" ., '"
· ·
.,; .... .,; ....
'\:I III '\:I III
0< '" 0< '"
~
~ .oJ
....
I -
O.d
1.oJ
1>:'0
"" 0 0
~ '" '"
..
., ~ U
H '" ·
.. g .. ':'
~ u '" G
.. >. '?
.... ..
0 u ~ ....
... · .. ö ..
~ '" '"
~ · H .. ·
:: '\:I .. ~ 0 ..
'\:I '" Ii '"
"" .. · · 1 ·
R .. III · .... · · ·
"" III A ~
.. to .. :: .. to
e .. 0 · ... 11 · · ·
0 .. III .. .. .. ..
., ..
., I ..
Eo< I · 0 .. ·
on · on
R 0 ., 0
~ .. I .. ..
0 ~ · M i M .. M ;¡
"" · ..
.oJ .. ! 8 0 8 0
.. ~ 0 0
"" .. 0 · ~ III III III III
'0 0 .. ·
'0 G · 11 .. II 'i 'i '\:I
i .. ·
I( i · 0 .. · · · ·
'" · 0 '" '" '" '"
.oJ ., '" oS' · ...
., .. .. oS' ..
.. · "- .. "-
1-1 · ~ ... .. ...
~ .. .;. ..
.oJ .; "- ..; "-
<f.I .. ": !
on '" · ., · ii
... .; · .; · ·
+ ., ... ., ., ., .,
.... .... · + ., · · · ·
.. + '" ... + '" '" '" '"
.... '\:I '" '\:I '\:I
g '" · g .... 'i · · 'i
... A '2 ... A '\:I '2 '2 '2
., 0 ., 0 H
· ... 0 · ... 0 0 0 0
., ., u ., ., u u u u
.. · · .. · · · · ·
., .. .. .. .. .. III
ä III ., ø .. ., u ., § ., ä .,
~ · ö · ö · ·
H l!. H l!. .... H ... ... H l!. ...
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. ..
.oJ
H
.oJ ·
<f.I ~ .,
... ~
.... H
R 0
0 .. u
u ..
· u
~ i ·
... i
:zoo ::I ....
· ::I
III ·
..
.... -
~ ...
I>: .. '" . on
01
'"
R
""
'"
1-1
'0
'0
R
'"
rD
....
....
""
....
rD
.oJ
;:I
U
1-1
0
....
III
.oJ
R
a
III >
'" 0
,Q
~ '"
'0
'"
III .oJ
III «I
t u
u ""
'0
R rzI R
~ ~ ""
U .oJ
«I ~ R
.... E-I ;
0 E-I
I( u
0
> IZc '0
""
III 0
;:I .d
.-4 ~ .oJ
U
I( ....
H 0
~ ~ .oJ
H
J «I
I H Do
.... IZc
0 .,
I H
.oJ E-I III
.d P: «I
01 rzI
"" '0
1-1 U
""
.... ....
0 ""
.oJ
.d H
.oJ
'0 U
""
J III
'0 ""
.oJ
R
.oJ
R ~
.,
1-1 U
«I .,
5 .oJ
.oJ
«I
III
III ""
.d
.oJ Eo<
~
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
95/96
NUMBER
95011
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED?
FUND
YES
NO
x
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FY 95/96 FUNDING FOR METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CA TEGO
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
********ÃÃA~AAAAÃÃAAAAAAÃÃÃ'Ã" ...".444....4...4444.... ......44...4444..44444.444444.... 4A444444444.44444.......
1120881301110000
1120881301601700
1120881302110000
1120881302601700
1120881309110000
1120881309601700
REVENUE
SALARIES-REGULAR
COPY SUPPLIES
SALARIES-REGULAR
COPY SUPPLIES
SALARIES-REGULAR
COPY SUPPLIES
$4,075.00
50.00
37,400.00
100.00
6,900.00
100.00
TOTAL
$48,625.00
AMOUNT
44444..44444444444444444..44444 4444444444444444444444... 4444444444444444'4'444444444444'4'44444444444444444444IA.
DESCRIPTION
2120824000240500
2120833000330001
2120851000512004
GRANT REVENUE-STATE
GRANT REVENUE-FEDERAL
TRANSFER FROM GEN'L FUND
$4,863.00
38,899.00
4,863.00
TOTAL
$48,625.00
4444444444...44444444444444.4.4 '4.4444...444.".444.4.444444'444.'.444444444444444444..444.444.44.4444444444444.4
APPROVALS:
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
PLANNING
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISO
SIGNATURE
DATE
~-//- 9.s:-
JPZ-/' -?'~
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
95/96
NUMBER
95012
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED?
FUND
YES
NO
x
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FY 95/96 FUNDING FOR COMMUNITY CRIME PREVENTION GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CA TEGO
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
************************************************************************************* **********************
1152029404110000
1152029404210000
1152029404312700
1152029404550000
1152029404600100
1152029404800100
REVENUE
SALARIES-REGULAR
FICA
CONSULTANT
TRAVEL
SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT
$10,515.00
804.00
867.00
500.00
685.00
6,904.00
TOTAL
$20,275.00
AMOUNT
************************************************************************************* **********************
DESCRIPTION
2152033000330404
2152051000512004
DCJS-COMMUNITY CRIME
TRANSFER FROM GEN'L FUND
$15,206.00
5,069.00
TOTAL
$20,275.00
************************************************************************************* **********************
APPROVALS:
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
POLICE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISO
SIGNATURE
~~~~
.~
DATE
8'-//- 9~
j?-;?-~.s-
FISCAL YEAR
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
95/96
NUMBER
95013
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
YES
NO
x
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FY 95/96 FUNDING FOR SECTION 8 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENT PROGRAM.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1122781920300205
1122781920312800
1122781920579001
1122781921300205
1122781921579001
1122781922300205
1122781922579001
ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
AUDIT
HOUSING ASSISTANCE
ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
HOUSING ASSISTANCE
ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
HOUSING ASSISTANCE
$94,079.00
400.00
968,508.00
19,372.00
189,174.00
12,725.00
129,135.00
TOTAL
$1,413,393.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2122733000330015
2122733000330016
2122733000330017
SECTION 8-001 GRANT
SECTION 8-002 GRANT
SECTION 8-003 GRANT
$1,062,987.00
208,546.00
141,860.00
TOTAL
$1,413,393.00
************************************************************************
APPROVALS:
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
HOUSING
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
~L· ~¿:4 ~____
';6'4 ~~ .
'7?
DATE
ß- ~;z.-~
ßí?-/;;Ø"~
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95014
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FY 95/96 FUNDING FOR SOIL AND WATER GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1154041055520100
1154041055950012
POSTAL SERVICES
SOIL & WATER-DWP PROJECT
$200.00
10,754.52
TOTAL
$10,954.52
2154033000330310
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
EPA-DIV SOIL & WATER DWP
$10,954.52
TOTAL
$10,954.52
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
ENGINEERING
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
;fff~:~
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~-i3t:J -7.>
)Ø' -~;:Ø:::;-
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95019
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FY 95/96 FUNDING FOR TRAFFIC UNIT EXPANSION GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1153031145129900
1153031145210000
1153031145300205
REIMBURSABLE OVERTIME
FICA
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
$8,086.72
618.45
1,683.00
TOTAL
$10,388.17
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2153033000330306
FEDERAL GRANT
$10,388.17
TOTAL
$10,388.17
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
POLICE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~A~ ~,~~.,Ø'--
~& ø~~~
/
~bðA>-
. ¡f
¡R-¡?-:Ø'S-
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95020
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
CAPITAL-SCHOOLS
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
LAMBS ROAD PROJECT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1900062420800685
VDOT-LAMBS ROAD PROJECT
$6,810.00
TOTAL
$6,810.00
REVENUE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2900051000510100
FUND BALANCE
$6,810.00
TOTAL
$6,810.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
K/~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~-;?-;Ø' ~
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95021
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
CAPITAL-GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
OLD BROOK PATHWAY PROJECT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1901081010950002
OLD BROOK PATHWAY
$6,686.00
TOTAL
$6,686.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2901051000510100
FUND BALANCE
$6,686.00
TOTAL
$6,686.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
ENGINEERING
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~£/9~
~?~~
?t..//
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
1$ "'!lff) -Ys-
~-?-f'~
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95022
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
X
FUND
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
VARIOUS FY 94/96 SCHOOL GRANTS.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1310460205600000
ENVIRONMENTAL GRANT-MISC. MATERIALS
$5,000.00
1310460212601300
MATHEMATICS GRANT-INSTR. MATERIALS
1,998.64
1310460214312500
1310460205312500
ARTISTS IN RESIDENCY-PROF SVCS INSTRU
ARTISTS IN RESIDENCY-PROF SVCS INSTRU
5,494.00
1,706.00
TOTAL
$14,198.64
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2310424000330113
2310451000510100
2310424000240285
2310424000240284
ENVIRONMENTAL GRANT
FUND BALANCE
VA COMM ARTS #96-0161
VA COMMARTS #960139
$5,000.00
1,998.64
5,494.00
1,706.00
TOTAL
$14,198.64
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~ -..3", - 'X...!>
fi?- /'-/ ~
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95023
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
SCHOOL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
AUTO STIPEND FOR SUPERINTENDENT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1241062120160200
1241090610999981
STIPENDS-NON INSTRUCTIONAL
SCHOOL BOARD RESERVE
$1,000.00
(1,000.00)
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
************************************************************************
$0.00
TOTAL
$0.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~-L/f? ~
~p~
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
fS' _.;:?o -7S"
;?-~;P'::;--
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
TO AMEND CERTAIN
PERMIT AND INSPECTION FEES
WHEREAS, Section 5-3 of the Code of Albemarle prescribes
fees required to be paid for permits and inspections for new
construction or other building operations; and
WHEREAS, the Code of Albemarle further provides that such
fees prescribed in Section 5-3 may be amended by resolution of
the Board of Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the efficient opera-
tion of government and good financial management requires the
elimination of all fees for construction projects owned by
Albemarle County or the Albemarle County Public School System.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, hereby amends Section
5-3 of the Code of Albemarle by resolution to eliminate all
permit and inspection fees for new construction or building
operations fqr any construction project owned by Albemarle County
or the Albemarle County Public School System.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously
adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, at a regular meeting held on September 6, 1995.
~hØ
Clerk, Board of count~perVisors
øL/
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
---------~
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
94/95
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
YES
NO
GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FISCAL YEAR FY 94/95 OVEREXPENDITURES.
940073
x
x
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100012013601700
1100021010601700
1100021030700003
1100031020110000
1100031020129900
1100031020210000
1100031020221000
1100031020270000
1100031020600800
1100031020800501
1100041021332300
1100059000563000
COMMUNITY SVCS
CIRCUIT COURT
MAGISTRATE
SHERIFF
COPY SUPPLIES
SALARIES
RENT
SALARIES
OVERTIME-REIMBURSABLE
FICA
RETIREMENT
WORKERS COMP
VEHICLE OPERATION
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
$1,050.00
8,600.00
1,600.00
27,650.00
26,850.00
2,050.00
2,250.00
1,150.00
2,250.00
4,300.00
300.00
2,450.00
$80,500.00
2100051000510100
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
STREET SIGNS
DISTRICT HOME
TOTAL
FUND BALANCE
TOTAL
$80,500.00
************************************************************************
$80,500.00
APPROVALS:
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
,ØL~~
~ Z¿/Í
~
DATE
$...j/-?S
~-/-?'J
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
94/95
NUMBER
940074
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
CAPITAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FISCAL YEAR FY 94/95 OVEREXPENDITURES.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
19000601D0800705
1900062420800673
1900060100950013
SCHOOL BOARD COMPUTER CABLING
SCHOOL BOARD HVAC IMPROVEMENTS
FACILITIES MAINTSTOP SWITCHES
$14,200.41
533.00
(14,733.41)
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
$0.00
TOTAL
$0.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
/?P~~4-
~~ ?/V øû'"-e:~
/þ~
.g!...7/- 9>
¡?-;;?--J'5
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
95/96
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
YES
NO
CIP-SCHOOL
95015
x
x
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATIONS FOR SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FROM FY 94/95.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1900060100800664
1900060100800665
1900060100950014
1900060100950042
1900060100950087
1900060205950021
1900060210800605
1900060210800901
1900060215312300
1900060255312350
1900060255800200
1900060255800605
1900060255800740
1900060301312350
1900060301800605
1900060301800901
1900060301800903
1900060302800901
1900060303312350
1900060303800901
1900060304312350
1900060410800605
1900060510800901
1900061101800700
1900062190800700
1900064010800700
1900064010800710
SCHOOL BOARD
SCHOOL BOARD
SCHOOL BOARD
SCHOOL BOARD
SCHOOL BOARD
HOLLYMEAD
STONE ROBINSON
STONE ROBINSON
AGNOR-HURT
SUTHERLAND
SUTHERLAND
SUTHERLAND
SUTHERLAND
ALBEMARLE
ALBEMARLE
ALBEMARLE
ALBEMARLE
W. ALBEMARLE
MURRAY EDUC.
MURRAY EDUC.
NEW HIGH SCHOOL
C.A.T.E.C
VEHI CLE MAINT.
CLASS/INST
ADM. - TECHN
DEPT OF ED
DEPT OF ED
SECURITY SYSTEMS
ADA STRUCTURAL CHANGE
SOIL MONITORING
UNDERGROUND STORAGE T
ENERGY MANAGEMENT
FOLDING WALL
CONSTRUCTION
RENOVATIONS
PROF. SER. ARCHITECTU
ENGINEERING/PLANNING
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
CONSTRUCTION
LAB EQUIPMENT
ENGINEERING/PLANNING
CONSTRUCTION
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
ASBESTOS REMOVAL
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
ENGINEERING/PLANNING
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
ENGINEERING/PLANNING
CONSTRUCTION
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
ADP EQUIPMENT
ADP EQUIPMENT
ADP EQUIPMENT
ADP-SOFTWARE
TOTAL
$75,692.32
115,592.19
7,622.50
76,535.00
21,161. 53
355.97
1,200.00
25,000.00
17,280.00
680.47
59,471.03
32,173.03
600.00
17,310.08
3,336.35
550.00
4,798.75
10,153.04
205.84
3,156.53
37,114.52
7,783.75
306,221.75
10,127.37
1,210.06
12,214.00
5,557.00
$853,103.08
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2900051000510100
FUND BALANCE
$853,103.08
TOTAL
$853,103.08
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
~~~~4-
~Ød~
þ<./
DATE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
'g-..5/- 9.ç-
jŸ-/~:Ç
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
95/96
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
YES
NO
CIP-GENERAL
95016
x
x
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATIONS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FROM FY 94/95.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1901012140950004
1901012200800301
1901012200800700
1901021050331000
1901031010950005
1901031040312703
1901031040950085
1901032010800510
1901032010800710
1901032010950092
1901033020700002
1901033020800665
1901041000800960
1901041000800961
1901041000800962
1901041000800963
1901041000800964
1901041000950011
1901041000950022
1901041000950035
1901041000950039
1901041000950059
1901041000950072
1901041000950073
1901041000950090
1901041000950091
1901041020950036
1901041020950051
1901041020950065
1901041020950081
1901041020950098
1901043100580411
1901043100800665
1901043100800666
1901043100800901
1901051020800901
1901051020950095
1901071000800665
1901071000800668
1901071000950003
1901071000950006
FINANCE
INFO. SERVICES
INFO. SERVICES
JUVENILE CT.
POLICE DEPT.
EMERGENCY SER.
EMERGENCY SER.
FIRE DEPART.
FIRE DEPART.
FIRE DEPART.
CORRECTION
CORRECTION
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
STREET IMP
STREET IMP
STREET IMP
STREET IMP
STREET IMP
COUNTY OFFICE
COUNTY OFFICE
COUNTY OFFICE
COUNTY OFFICE
HEALTH DEPT.
HEALTH DEPT.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
COMMUNICATION EQUIP-R
ADP EQUIPMENT
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
SATELLITE RECEIVERS
E-911 LOCATOR SYSTEM
E911 JOINT CITY/COUNT
SERVICE VEHICLES-NEW
DATA PROCESSING SOFTW
FIRE HOUSE
REGIONAL JAIL
ADA STRUCTURAL CHANGE
STREET LIGHTS
ST. LTS.HYDRAU./COMMO
ST.LTS. HYDRAU/GEORGE
ST LTS-WHITEWOOD/GEOR
ST LTS-GEORGTN/COMMON
HYDRAULIC ROAD SIDEWA
ASPHALT PATH-GEORGETO
NORTH BERKSHIRE ROAD
MEADOWCREEK PARKWAY E
KEENE LANDFILL CLOSUR
PARK ROAD EXTENSION
SIDEWALK-FIFTH STREET
IVY ROAD
BARRACKS RD SIDEWALK
BERKMAR DRIVE EXTENDE
AVON ST RT 20 CONNECT
COMMONWEALTH DRIVE
REVENUE SHARING ROADS
MECHUMS WEST
ADA COMPLIANCE
ADA STRUCTURAL CHANGE
FACILITY MAINT.
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
HEALTH DEPT-NEW WING
ADA STRUCTURAL CHANGE
ADA CHANGES-SCHOOLS
CROZET PARK IMPROVEME
CROZET/GREENWOOD FLD
$150,000.00
1,875.24
14,030.60
4,528.45
245,900.00
179,056.32
714,474.49
9,100.00
24,060.00
150,000.00
207,107.28
35,250.00
40,000.00
16,000.00
16,000.00
12,000.00
16,000.00
32,817.89
13,000.00
3,800.00
109,060.75
376,976.35
41,000.00
78,000.00
1,667.00
11,000.00
252,475.91
220,700.00
650.00
11,107.90
3,071.00
65,940.81
42,435.05
17,930.00
17,122.98
2,690.00
12,444.22
197,827.80
93,375.80
518.70
1,806.85
1901071000950009
1901071000950010
1901071000950015
1901071000950016
1901071000950018
1901071000950019
1901071000950031
1901071000950047
1901071000950079
1901071000950080
1901071000950083
1901071002800650
1901073020312350
1901073020800663
1901073020800673
1901073020800902
1901073020950062
1901073020950076
1901081010950001
1901081010950002
REVENUE
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
TOWE MEMORIAL
LIBRARIES
LIBRARIES
LIBRARIES
LIBRARIES
LIBRARIES
LIBRARIES
PLANNING
PLANNING
SCOTTSV COMMUNITY CEN
CHRIS GREENE LAKE
WALTON TENNIS COURTS
CALE BASKETBALL CT
WHITEWOOD ROAD
JOUETT TENNIS COURTS
WARS TENNIS CT RESUR
BEAVER CREEK PARK
STONE ROBINSON REC. I
HOLLYMEAD REC. IMP.
STONY PNT RURITAN BAS
BUILDINGS-CONSTRUCTIO
ENGINEERING/PLANNING
CARPET REPLACEMENT
HVAC IMPROVEMENTS
ROOF REPAIRS/IMPROVEM
LIBRARY RENOVATIONS
NORTH BRANCH LIBRARY
HYDRAULIC/RIO BIKE PA
OLD BROOK RD SIDEWALK
TOTAL
DESCRIPTION
14,400.00
5,859.00
12,400.00
2,359.00
30,000.00
12,400.00
25,000.00
7,425.48
1,946.69
5,169.90
894.04
18,334.70
8,019.00
20,000.00
100,000.00
4,324.50
22,536.77
4,223.10
43,000.00
15,132.75
$3,796,226.32
************************************************************************
AMOUNT
2901019000120605
2901024000240429
2901024000240430
2901051000510100
RECOVERED COST
CATEGORICAL AID
CATEGORICAL AID
FUND BALANCE
E911 FUND
VDOT-BERKMAR
VDOT-250E LANDSCAPING
TOTAL
$893,530.81
160,692.18
44,234.00
2,697,769.33
$3,796,226.32
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~d·~&o~
~ø~~
DATE
% -.5 /- Ji'5
~:-7'-~ç
FISCAL YEAR
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
95/96
NUMBER
95017
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
x
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
YES
NO
x
GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATIONS FOR GENERAL FUND ENCUMBERANCES FROM FY 94/95.
EXPENDITURE
COST CTR/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100011010800710
1100012010350000
1100012141800200
1100012141800700
1100012142800100
1100012142800201
1100012142800700
1100012143800200
1100012143800201
1100012143800700
1100012144800700
1100012145800201
1100012145800700
1100031011800100
1100031020600900
1100041000312700
1100042040390010
1100043002331200
1100043002332200
1100043003800101
1100053012301212
1100081010312700
1100081010350000
1100081010800100
BOARD OF SUPV. ADP SOFTWARE
COUNTY EXEC. PRINTING & BINDING
FINANCE-ADM. FURN. & FIXTURES
FINANCE-ADM. ADP EQUIPMENT
FINANCE-ASSESS. MAC. & EQUIP.
FINANCE-ASSESS. FURN. & FIXTURES
FINANCE-ASSESS. ADP EQUIPMENT
FINANCE-ACCT. FURN. & FIXTURES
FINANCE-ACCT. FURN. & FIXTURES-REPL
FINANCE-ACCT. ADP EQUIPMENT
FINANCE-REAL EST.ADP EQUIPMENT
FINANCE-PURC. FURN. & FIXTURES-REPL
FINANCE-PURC. ADP EQUIPMENT
POLICE-MGT. MAC. & EQUIP.
SHERIFF VEHICLE SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING PROF. SER.-CONSULTANT
SOLID WASTE CURBSIDE RECYCLING
STAFF SERVICES R&M EQUIP/BLDG
STAFF SERVICES MAINT. CONTRACTS
STAFF SERVICES MAC. & EQUIP.-REPL
VPA BENEFITS F.S. ISSUANCE-CONTR
PLANNING PROF. SER.-CONSULTANT
PLANNING PRINTING & BINDING
PLANNING MAC. & EQUIP.
$690.00
3,600.00
128.33
3,393.00
650.00
2,866.33
12,131.00
158.00
4,030.66
6,932.00
3,048.00
212.00
6,957.00
215.32
359.48
293.80
9,422.00
7,186.00
1,000.00
605.55
6,027.44
7,919.84
2,840.00
300.00
TOTAL
$80,965.75
REVENUE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2100051000510100
FUND BALANCE
$80,965.75
TOTAL
$80,965.75
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISOR
SIGNATURE
?£A?~
a;; øtØ-z¿~
/4;~
DATE
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
;;;r-..3/"-;9.s-
¡'-?'¿;'/
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
95/96
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
YES
NO
GENERAL
95018
x
x
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATIONS FOR GENERAL FUND PROJECTS FROM FY 94/95 CARRYOVER.
EXPENDITURE
COST CTR/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100013020130000
1100013020320000
1100013020520100
1100013020800100
1100021020601200
1100021060120000
1100021060312800
1100021060331100
1100021060332100
1100021060350200
1100021060350300
1100021060520100
1100021060600103
1100021060800101
1100021060800200
1100022010800100
1100022010800200
1100031011120000
1100031013310000
1100031013311000
1100031013601101
1100031013800100
1100031013800300
1100041000800700
1100041000800710
1100041000950023
1100042040390001
1100043002331200
1100053012800201
1100053013800201
1100053014110000
1100053014210000
1100053014221000
1100053014231000
1100053014232000
1100053014241000
1100053014270000
1100053014550400
1100053014600100
1100053014800200
1100053014800700
BOARD OF ELEC.
GENL DISTRICT CT
CLERK OF COURT
COMM. ATTORNEY
POLICE-MGT.
POLICE-PATROL
ENGINEERING
SOLID WASTE
STAFF SERVICES
VPA-BENEFITS
VPA-SERVICES
PiT WAGES
TEMP. HELP SERVICE
POSTAL SERVICES
MACH. & EQUIP.
BOOKS & SUBSC.
OVERTIME WAGES
PROF. SER.-AUDIT
R&M-OFF. EQUIP
MAINT. CONTRACTS
BINDING OF RECORDS
INDEXING SERVICE
POSTAL SERVICE
RECORD BOOKS
MAC. & EQUIP-REPL
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
MAC. & EQUIP.
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
OVERTIME WAGES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
HEALTH SERVICES
UNIFORMS-NEW
MAC. & EQUIP.
COMMUNICATION EQUIP.
ADP EQUIP
ADP SOFTWARE
AUTOMART-ROAD BOND
KEENE LANDFILL
REPAIR & MAINT.
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
SALARIES-REGULAR
FICA
RETIREMENT
HEALTH INSURANCE
DENTAL INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
TRAVEL-EDUC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
ADP-EQUIPMENT
$754.85
688.05
1,612.01
8,250.00
3,200.00
2,000.00
528.18
500.00
304 . 00
209.88
3,200.00
300.00
600.00
3,500.00
10,000.00
400.00
900.00
20,000.00
5,000.00
4,080.00
8,400.00
4,000.00
30,000.00
3,000.00
1,200.00
16,970.00
150,000.00
9,000.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
34,163.00
2,613.00
2,979.00
1,740.00
60.00
120.00
50.00
2,000.00
500.00
1,000.00
2,500.00
1100081010350000
1100081010312385
1100081010800100
1100081030550400
1100081030800700
1100081031231000
1100081031232000
1100081031550400
1100081031800700
1100081040601500
1100081040800100
1100081040800200
1100081040800300
PLANNING
PRINTING & BINDING
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
MAC. & EQUIP.
TRAVEL-EDUCATION
ADP EQUIPMENT
HEALTH INSURANCE
DENTAL INSURANCE
TRAVEL-EDUCATION
ADP EQUIPMENT
MERC. FOR RESALE
MAC. & EQUIP.
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
COMMUNICATION EQUIP
450.00
45,000.00
1,000.00
3,232.00
2,100.00
2,060.00
68.00
1,165.00
300.00
1,275.00
4,500.00
1,475.00
525.00
$401,471.97
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2100024000240110
2100051000510100
HOUSING
ZONING
TOTAL
PUBLIC ASSISTANCE-ADM.
FUND BALANCE
TOTAL
$23,860.00
377,611.97
************************************************************************
$401,471.97
FINANCE
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANÇE
BOARD OF SUPERVISOR
SIGNATURE
~L~~QL-
#~V7
~n./
DATE
%--5'/-7.5"
~-~¿;~
'"
#/S//,P¿/,/6'7'/
BATESVILLE RURITANS
P.O. BOX 265
BATESVILLE, VA 22920
-,
6 199;
Aug. 15, 1995
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Supervisors,
The Batesville Ruritan Club is asking for your assistance in our planned project to
bring a public recreation facility to Batesville. The attached resolution is asking the State
Forestry Department to lease a portion of their property in Batesville for recreational use.
Your concurrence in the need for such recreational facilities in Batesville, as well as your
endorsement of this project, would be greatly appreciated. We feel we will be able to
provide an excellent public recreational facility for our neighborhood without the
expenditure of tax funds, a rare occurrence in these days. Thank you for your
considera tion.
..
Sincerely,
ð:!::POllOCk
President
L\
'\?/'
,).
,'~ ~)
., i .,
'-':> "
BATESVILLE RURITAN CLUB
P.O. BOX 265
BATESVILLE, VA 22924
Aug. 3, 1995
Mr. James Garner
Director
Virginia Dept. of Forestry
P.O. Box 3758
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Dear Mr. Garner,
Several months ago I had the pleasure of meeting with Mr.
Olinger and Mr. Jenkins at the Forestry Office to discuss our
club's interest in using a portion of the old State shed property
In Batesville as a public recreation site. I explained our
commitment to building tennis courts, a picnic area and a
childrens' play area, all hopefully on the western half of the
Forestry property in Batesville. I also mentioned how the Forestry
Dept. ' s use of the property as a parking lot for old surplus
vehicles really did not blend in with the residential nature of our
area. Both gentlemen were extremely pleasant and explained how the
Forestry Department acts as an agent for the Federal Government to
channel surplus vehicles to volunteer rescue squads and fire
departments. throughout the State. I also learned that the
Batesville storage lot is the only one the Forestry Dept. has and
that if an area closer to Charlottesville could be found, they
would certainly be receptive to vacating a portion of the lot for
use as a public recreation area.
My purpose in writing is to hopefully speed up the process
by sending you the attached resolution from our Club stating our
seriousness about the project and our desire to bring it to
fruition. A major hurdle will be to free up the Forestry property.
Our club is asking for yours and others help in this process.
If I can answer any questions about our project please feel
free to call me at 823-7330. Perhaps a meeting at the site would be
beneficial. I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
à!1 ~110Ck
President
encl.
..
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Batesville Ruritan Club is a service organization
dedicated to the well being of the Batesville Community, and
WHEREAS, public recreational facilities for the Batesville
Community are limited, and
WHEREAS, the Batesville Ruritan Club perceives the need for a
public family recreation area in Batesville, and
WHEREAS, such an area should include tennis courts, a picnic area,
and a childrens' play area, and
WHEREAS, the Batesville Ruritan Club has the financial and human
resources to undertake such a project, and
WHEREAS, the most suitable site for such a recreational site is the
"old State shed" on the Miller School Road [St. RT. 635], and
WHEREAS, the State Forestry Office currently uses this site as an
equipment and Federal surplus vehicle storage site, and
WHEREAS, such usage is incompatible with the residential nature of
the area in Batesville adjacent to the site, and
WHEREAS, such a recreation site would occupy only the western half
of the State shed property, then
BE IT RESOLVED that the Batesville Ruritan Club respectfully
request the Virginia State Department of Forestry to lease part of
the old State shed property to the Batesville Ruritans for use as
a public recreation facility open to all, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be sent to
the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors and to Governor Allen to
solicit their assistance in this community project.
...
their June
Passed unanimously by the
lA meCk
sei:tary
Batesville Ruritan Club at
ATTESTED
#' ..,
PROCLAMATION
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH
WHEREAS, in the Commonwealth of Virginia, 29,805 women and 8,640 children sought domestic violence
services from July, 1993 to June, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the Albemarle community is committed to restoring the right to freedom from fear in our own
homes; and
WHEREAS, in our quest to impose sanctions on those who break the law by perpetrating violence, we must
also meet the needs of battered women and their children who often suffer grave financial,
physical and psychological losses; and
WHEREAS, the crime of domestic violence violates an individual's privacy, dignity, security and humanity;
and
WHEREAS, the impact of domestic violence is wide-ranging, directly affecting women and children and
society as a whole, crossing all economic, racial and societal boundaries;
NOW, 11lEREFORE,
in recognition of the important work being done by domestic violence
programs, I, Walter F. Perkins, Chairman, on behalf of the Albemarle Board
of County Supervisors, do hereby proclaim the month of
OCTOBER, 1995,
as
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH
.' .:__,::,::P;~r~~~r~?'}'~,~:- '\ \
'0 ,C'. \~\ "'i,J,,),:· .,
" ".,,\~ _ ..."/ ¡,) ,
.~_ ,)-) ...- .. V4' oJ.
.//l';,., >~< . ".I "1" .~
II ~~ / <' . ":".~ \~
.(.__~_" .. ~".).l... .,.11- ',~~' _. ,
li~'¿~:: '8 "1"~. .' u. "J\~;oC~t.
,-;f~.\o.·;' ' .,!....;j
'Ã .:.h ' u": :\."'* -..;0' ,~ .~'J
~ t'~.. ,·~i
'\~i' -"-. ./~ 1,!;>""-
, .l/'r;/n'·.. ..--,.,~ -~.'~ ~--
,~,,¥& (J 1\ ~ '-:'
,-~ ~::.~~;~:è·~~~~}J··:".._· .
and urge all citizens to actively participate in the scheduled activities and
programs sponsored by the Shelter for Help in Emergency to work toward the
elimination of personal and institutional violence against women.
Signed and sealed this 6th day of September, 1995.
{¡j~:?--: ~~
CHAIRMAN
ALBEMARLE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS
f
n' 'b ^.. '^ b^¡rd' ?-/-~
IJls\n ~Itç\.¡ ou gy . ----.
Agenda Item No, fl"f ¿1J?¿1!: Ô
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS:
In the Commonwealth of Virginia, 29,805 women and 8,640 children sought domestic
violence services from July 1993 to June 1994; and
WHEREAS:
The Albemarle County community is committed to restoring the right to freedom from
fear in our own homes; and
WHEREAS:
In our quest to impose sanctions on those who break the law by perpetrating violence,
we must also meet the needs of battered women and their children who often suffer
grave financial, physical, and psychological losses; and
WHEREAS:
The crime of domestic violence violates an individual's privacy, dignity, security, and
humanity; and
WHEREAS:
The impact of domestic violence is wide-ranging, directly affecting women and
children and society as a whole, crossing all economic, racial, and societal
boundaries;
NOW, THEREFORE:
In recognition of the important work being done by domestic violence programs, I ,
Gary O'Connell, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia,
do hereby proclaim the month of October 1995 as DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
AWARENESS MONTH and urge all citizens to actively participate in the scheduled
activities and programs sponsored by the Shelter for Help in Emergency to work
toward the elimination of personal and institutional violence against women.
Signed and sealed
"
Shelter
..=~
Working to end domestic
violence in our community
August 8, 1995
Ella Carey
Albemarle County Office building
401 Mcintire Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22902
9 :995
..
Dear Ms. Carey,
Enclosed please find information concerning a proclamation to designate October as
Domestic Violence Awareness Month in Albemarle County. I ask that this item be
placed on the agenda for the September 6, 1995 Board of Supervisors meeting.
Nationally, October is recognized as Domestic Violence Awareness Month. The
Shelter for Help in Emergency, a domestic violence program that serves Albemarle, is
dedicated to ending domestic violence in our community. To that end, we are asking
for your help in proclaiming October as "Domestic Violence Awareness Month." By
signing this proclamation, the Board of Supervisors would send a clear message to
the community: that domestic violence will not be tolerated in Albemarle County.
Enclosed please find a sample proclamation; you can sign this copy or type one of
your own to be accompanied by an official seal.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. If I can be of any further assistance,
please contact me at 293-6155.
~~
Maggie Cullinan, M.Ed.
Outreach/Education Coordinator
.<
Shelter for Help in Emergency
P.o. Box 3013 · University Station · Charlottesville, Virginia 22903-0013 . Hotline: (804) 293-8509 . Office: (804) 293-6155
@ Printed on Recycled Paper
", \
,
¡
'0, <I'
·""~t.. ...~/' .R
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouel1
Walter F. Perkins
While Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scoltsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
MEMO TO:
Jo Higgins, Director of Engineering
DATE:
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ~ JVI~
September 8, 1995 ~
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Road Resolutions adopted on September 6, 1995
Attached is the original resolution (plus four copies) adopted by
the Board on September 6, 1995, requesting acceptance of roads in
Emerald Ridge Subdivision into the State Secondary System of
Highways.
EWC:len
Attachments (5)
*
Printed on recycled paper
,
~
,
The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, virgin-
ia, in regular meeting on the 6th day of September, 1995, adopted
the following resolution:
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, the streets in Emerald Ridge Subdivision described
on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated September 6, 1995,
fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle
County, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department
of Transportation has advised the Board that the streets meet the
requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements
of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of
County supervisors requests the virginia Department of Transpor-
tation to add the roads in Emerald Ridge SUbdivision as described
on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated September 6, 1995,
to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229,
Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Re-
quirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and
unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary
easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the
recorded plats; and
FURTHER'RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be
forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
* * * * *
Recorded vote:
Moved by: Mrs. Humphris.
Seconded by: Mr. Bowerman.
Yeas: Mr. Marshall, Mr. Martin, Mr. Perkins, Mrs. Thomas,
Mr. Bowerman and Mrs. Humphris.
Nays: None.
A Copy Teste:
~~~
Ella W. Carey, c1 rk, CMC
,
" ../
'.
"-
:>4
~ LO ....
0\ 0
t!> \D
H 0\ "'-
:I: 'Ó
rz:I GJ
....
E-t oJ
I'( Q ....
E-t R
GJ
tI) .9
....
rz. R U
0 GJ oJ
§ ....
:E: ....
. tC
rz:I ....
E-t 1/1
R
:>4 H
tI) >.
....
:>4 GJ
.
~ ::I
tI.I
~ 0
0
U
rz:I R
tI) 0
on
rz:I ....
::I
:x: M
E-t 0
1/1 ¡::
GJ
0 ø: 0
E-t ..-1
1/1 !II
. ..-1
0 >
1/1
..-f ..-1
t
GJ
§'
tI.I
....
0
'Ó
.
oJ
0
III
III r-I
ftS
~
GI
>. ~
M
R
0
GJ ¡::
R 0
0 ..-1
~ !II
u ..-1
GJ >
,C
2 .,..¡
'Ø
0 '§
.... tI)
....
R I .
GJ 0
.9
H u i
~ oJ
....
~ ....
tC Z
1-
M - :>
¡s
~ - VI
-:::::. - C)
~
E. - 0
a::
~ jiÞ~
;! IIII!:.i ~
en 0
Ê ~
o VI
"-
.cI
....
tn 1/1
R
GJ GJ
,.:¡ M
on
R ::e:
0 GJ
..-f
.... R
..-f ..-f
'Ó M
'0 H
tC GJ 1/1
.... ..,.
R .. :;
GJ M
t.J 0 .; 0
1/1 GI
GJ 01
.... "' ftS
0 "' GI
Z '" '"
..... ;;- r-I
0
1/1 .. ... .. ... ..-1
::I ..... :;, :E:
I .. I
0 u u
GJ " " r-I
R " .. " .. as
oJ .. ..
M .. .. .. .. . .J
... ...
M " , .. , 0
GJ tJI r- tJI r- E-t
u " ..
R tJI R tJI
1/1 ... .. .. ..
on .. ..
::e: .. "' .. "'
" .. " ..
... ...
:g ... ..; ...
.. ~ ..
oC " "
~
....
a: ....
I -
0,C
I ....
ø:'Ó
..-f 0 0
a: "' "'
...
.. ... u
.. "' ..
.. " .. ..
... 0 M ~
.. u
... ... ~
0 u ...
.. .. ... a 8 :::
i '"
.. ":' .. ":'
... " ..
.. :g :;: '" 0 :;:
... ~
..-f .. " ... '" ...
R .. .. ... e ;
.. " .g, " " "
..-f .. tJI tJI tJI tJI tJI
e .. 0 .. ... :J " .. " "
0 .. .. .. .. .. ..
GJ .. .. ..
I ..
E-o I ... 0 .. ...
"' .. .. "'
R 0 0
þ ... I .. ...
0 þ .. I ;¡
..-f .. .. ... ... ... ...
.... .. ~ ~ 8 0 0
.. þ 0 0
..-f .. 0 .. .. .. ..
'Ó 0 .. ..
'Ó " " '¥ .. .. '¥ '¥ '¥ 'i
tC -3' -3' " 0 .. " " " "
.. " 0 " " " "
.... .. .. " " '"
... -3'
" .. .. .. -3' ..
" .. " ..... .. .....
. " ... ... .. ...
... .. .;; ..
.... ò ..... ... ;;;-
tI.I .ñ ... ~
"' ; .,
.. .; ... .; .. " " "
+ .. ... .. .. .. ..
... ... .. + ., .. .. .. ..
... + " ... + " " " "
... '"
R '" '" g ... '" '" '" '"
0 " " " " "
... R '" ... R '" '" '" '"
.. 0 .. .. 0 .. .. .. ..
.. ... 0 .. ... 0 0 0 0
.. .. u .. .. u u u u
.. .. " .. " .. " " "
.. .. .. .. .. .. ..
ä .. .. ä .. .. ä .. ä .. ~
..
.. ö .. .. ö .. ..
.. ~ ... .. ... .. ~ ... .. ... ~ ...
... .. ... E< .. .. .. .. E< .. .. ..
....
GJ
tD
.
.... " ..
tI.I Þ
... ~
.... ..
" 0
0 ... u
GJ u ...
" u
m i ..
... i
z :g ....
" :g
.. ..
..
.... 0 ....
GJ Z .. '" ... .,
ø:
GJ
tn
oJ
R
..-f
oJ
.
'Ó
'Ó
R
oJ
m
M
M
..-f
....
m
....
::I
u
.
0
....
1/1
....
R
"
m tD
1/1 >
II! 0
" ,Q
t- III
'Ó
III GJ
1/1 ....
11/ III
" t u
U ..-f
" 'Ó
R æ R
~ ..-f
U ....
III ;5 R
.... tD
0 ~ §
U
GJ 0
> 'Ó
..-f rz.
1/1 0 GJ
::I .cI
M Z ....
u
M 0 ....
" H 0
>. 8 ....
III .
t III
I H ø.
.... rz.
0 III
I H
.... E-t 1/1
.cI ø:: III
tn rz:I
..-f 'Ó
. U "
..-f
.... ....
0 ..-f
,C ....
.
.... "
'Ó U
..-f
t 1/1
'Ó ..-f
GJ ....
tD R
.... GJ
R .9
III
. U
III III
5 ....
....
III
1/1 1/1
..-f
tD .cI
.... E-<
~
Distributed \0 Baird: J?-/-;;:£
Agemta Item No ,93:-/~~2-
The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, virgin-
ia, in regular meeting on the 6th day of September, 1995, adopted
the following resolution:
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, the streets in Emerald Ridge Subdivision described
on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated September 6, 1995,
fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle
County, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department
of Transportation has advised the Board that the streets meet the
requirements established by the Subdivision Street Reauirements
of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of
County Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transpor-
tation to add the roads in Emerald Ridge Subdivision as described
on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated september 6, 1995,
to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229,
Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Re-
quirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and
unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary
easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the
recorded plats; and
FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be
forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
* * * * *
Recorded vote:
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Yeas:
Nays:
A Copy Teste:
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC
The roads described on Additions Form SR-5(A) are:
1) Saddleback Drive from station 11+25, left edge of
pavement of state Route 684, 2018 linear feet to sta-
tion 31+18.50, left edge of pavement of Saddleback
Court with a 50 foot right-of-way as shown on a plat
recorded 6/27/89 in Deed Book 1054, pages 492-496, for
a length of 0.38 mile. Additional drainage easement
shown on plat recorded 8/10/95 in Deed Book 1485, pages
7-18.
2) Saddleback Court from station 9+74.49, edge of pavement
of Highlander Way, 385 linear feet to station 13+59.51,
edge of pavement at the end of cul-de-sac with a 50
foot right-of-way as shown on a plat recorded 6/27/89
in Deed Book 1054, pages 492-496, for a length of 0.07
mile. Additional drainage easement shown on plat
recorded 8/10/95 in Deed Book 1485, pages 7-18.
Total - 0.45 mile.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ella Carey, Clerk, Board of Supervisors
FROM: Mark B. Henry, Civil Enginee~
DATE: August 21, 1995
RE: Emerald Ridge Subdivision (SUB-88-104)
The road serving the referenced subdivision is substantially complete and ready for a
VDOT acceptance inspection. Attached is the completed SR-5(A) form for a resolution,
which I request be taken to the Board for adoption at your next opportunity. Once the
resolutions have been adopted, please date and sign the SR-5(A), and please provide
me with the original and four copies.
Thanks for your assistance. Please contact me if you have any questions.
MBH/ctj
Attachment
File: mark/emerB_21.res
~TE_______________~~~~
---------------------------
~ ITlMID. ___á~~¿~______________________
,
AmD\ ITIMN4E __~A~~=~---
DEFFRRID lNfIL --_~~~~LL¿:~¿¿~---------
Form. 3
7/25/86
r
,
'-'}
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
R Ivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
WhiteHall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
SUBJECT:
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ~ ø a~
September 8, 1995 ~
Appropriations Approved on September 6, 1995
MEMO TO:
FROM:
DATE:
At the Board's meeting on September 6, 1995, the following appropriations were
approved:
Appropriation Form #9501l for FY 1995-96 Metropolitan Planning Organization
Grant in the amount of $48,625.00.
Appropriation Form #95012 for FY 1995-96 Funding for Community Crime Preven-
tion Grant in the amount of $20,275.00.
Appropriation Form #95013 for FY 1995-96 funding for Section 8 Housing Assis-
tance Payment PFogram in the amount of $l,413,393.00.
Appropriation Form #95014 for FY 1995-96 funding for Soil and Water Grant in
the amount of $10,954.52.
Appropriation Form #95019 for FY 1995-96 funding for Traffic Unit Expansion
Grant in the amount of $10,388.17.
Appropriation Form #95020 for funding of the Lambs Road Project in the amount
of $6,810.00.
Appropriation Form #95021 for funding of the Old Brook Pathway Project in the
amount of $6,686.00.
EWC:len
Attachments (7)
cc: Nancy O'Brien
Wayne Cilimberg
John Miller
Virginia McDonald
Jo Higgins
Kevin Castner
*
Printed on recycled paper
../ "'"
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Appropriation ofMPO Grant
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
Dj~: 7'-/-J':::('
~enct. ¡t~ No Z'fø:'tf?'/ ~tf(
INFORMATION:
ACTION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Request approval of Appropriation #95011 in the amount of $48,625
for the Metropolitan Planning Organization Program.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
~
I
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Cilimberg
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The 1995/96 Unified Planning Work Program was prepared by the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission for the Charlottesville
Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization. The program includes transportation studies and ongoing planning activities, including a
Transportation Improvement Program which lists road and transit improvement for the upcoming three years, and the 20-year Charlottesville
Area Transportation study updated every five years. Other activities address traffic congestion reduction, city-county bicycle and pedestrian
improvements, and public-private transit development.
DISCUSSION:
The work to bepeñonned by the COlmtyofAlbemarle will be funded by a $38,899 Federal Grant, a $4,863 State Grant, and a $4,863 transfer
fÌ'om the Planning Department's approved Budget.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Appropriation #95011 in the amount of $48,625.
95.131
95011.wpd
.--/ .
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
95/96
NUMBER
95011
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED?
FUND
YES
NO
x
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FY 95/96 FUNDING FOR METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTERlCA TEGO
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
************444444444444******* ******4444A4444444AA4*********4AAAAAAAAA44A4'44AA'AAA'4AA'AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA4AAAAA4"
1120881301110000
1120881301601700
1120881302110000
1120881302601700
1120881309110000
1120881309601700
REVENUE
SALARIES-REGULAR
COPY SUPPLIES
SALARIES-REGULAR
COPY SUPPLIES
SALARIES-REGULAR
COPY SUPPLIES
$4,075.00
50.00
37,400.00
1 00.00
6,900.00
1 00.00
...
TOTAL
$48,625.00
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AAAAAAA"A"'AAAAAAA4A"A"A'A' AAAAAAAA'AA"A'A"AAAAAA"AAAAA'AAAAA""""'AA"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA'AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
2120824000240500
2120833000330001
2120851000512004
GRANTREVENUE-ST ATE
GRANT REVENUE-FEDERAL
TRANSFER FROM GEN'L FUND
$4,863.00
38,899.00
4,863.00
TOTAL
$48,625.00
AAAAAAAAAA"AAAAAAAA"AAAA'A'" âAAA'AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA""'AAAA"AAAAAAAAAAAA'AAA4'AAAAAAAAAAAAA'AAA4'AAAA'AA4AAA
APPROVALS:
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
PLANNING
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISO
SIGNATURE
DATE
?-././- 9§:
f'2/7'~
..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Appropriation - Community Crime Prevention Grant
AGENDA DATE:
ITEM NUMBER:
Distributed i> bId: fi'~¿£:
INF_itm~. .?,J¿1f??¿7/ ~4
ACTION:
SUBJECfIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Request approval of Appropriation #95012 in the amount of$20,275
for Community Crime Prevention Grant.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Miller
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
For several years, the County of Albemarle has experienced a steady increase in its crime rate in burglaries, larcenies, and motor vehicle thefts.
The pwpose of this grant is to continue to develop a comprehensive crime prevention network for the community, since enhanced departmental
crime prevention capabilities seems to have been a factor in some target crime category decreases for 1994.
DISCUSSION:
The Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) has renewed the Community Crime Prevention Grant, 96-B8421, in the amount of
$20,275, $15,206 in Federal funds and $5,069 in local cash matching funds. The local match will be funded out of cUlTent budgeted
expenditures.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Appropriation #95012 in the amount of $20,275.
95.132
95012.wpd
..
.,.
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
95/96
NUMBER
95012
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED?
FUND
YES
NO
x
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FY 95/96 FUNDING FOR COMMUNITY CRIME PREVENTION GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTERlCA TEGO
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
************************************************************************************* **********************
1152029404110000
1152029404210000
1152029404312700
1152029404550000
1152029404600100
1152029404800100
REVENUE
SALARIES-REGULAR
FICA
CONSULTANT
TRAVEL
SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT
$10,515.00
804.00
8~7.00
500.00
685.00
6,904.00
TOTAL
$20,275.00
AMOUNT
******************************************************* ****************************** .*********************
DESCRIPTION
2152033000330404
2152051000512004
DCJS-COMMUNITY CRIME
TRANSFER FROM GEN'L FUND
$15,206.00
5,069.00
TOTAL
$20,275.00
************************************************************************************* **********************
APPROVALS:
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
POLICE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISO
SIGNATURE
F67~~'
¿tv
DATE
3"-//-~~
j?-;?-,øS-
J, ..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Appropriation - Housing Assistance Payment Program.
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
. ITEMNUM~ER~_/_~
tk;tllbuted ~ tiwHL_______
~ ¡Wffl No ~¿1"~5
INFORMATION:
ACTION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Request approval of Appropriation #95013 in the amount of
$1,413,393 for FY 95/96 Funding for Section 8 Housing Assistance
Payment Program.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Ms. White, Ms. McDonald
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The Section 8 Housing Program is an ongoing rental assistance program offered by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD). The Section 8-001 program provides housing assistance with 178 subsidies. Program 8-001 is funded through June 2002. The
Section 8-002 program provides 34 housing vouchers. The Section 8-003 program provides housing assistance for 35 units.
DISCUSSION:
The :final amount of the Federal HUD grant will be determined by the fmal amount of assistance rendered to residents. It is estimated that the
grant 8-001 should total approximately $1,062,987, grant 8-002 should be approximately $208,546, and grant 8-003 should be approximately
$141,860, a total of$1,413,393.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Appropriation #95013 as detailed on attached form.
95013.WP
95.135
..J ...
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
95/96
NUMBER
95013
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
YES
NO
x
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FY 95/96 FUNDING FOR SECTION 8 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENT PROGRAM.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1122781920300205
1122781920312800
1122781920579001
1122781921300205
1122781921579001
1122781922300205
1122781922579001
ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
AUDIT
HOUSING ASSISTANCE
ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
HOUSING ASSISTANCE
ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
HOUSING ASSISTANCE
$94,079.00
400.00
968,508.00
19,372.00
189,174.00
12,725.00
129,135.00
TOTAL
$1,413,393.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2122733000330015
2122733000330016
2122733000330017
SECTION 8-001 GRANT
SECTION 8-002 GRANT
SECTION 8-003 GRANT
$1,062,987.00
208,546.00
141,860.00
TOTAL
$1,413,393.00
************************************************************************
APPROVALS:
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
HOUSING
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
~L· ~¿:4 ~"'-
-~ ~~7;'
DATE
ß - tZ.;¡!.. - ~
ý?- ;7;:øÇ
,
..~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Reappropriation - Soil and Water Conservation
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
Distributed i;¡ Board: Y'-/-~._
~~J.tao.. ~ f?5 ~"p~.s;
- v J1"V1< UKM.:ttTlON.
ACTION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Request approval of Appropriation #95014 in the amount of
$10,754.52 for Soil and Water Conservation grant.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Ms. Higgins
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
On October 7, 1993, the Chainnan of the Board of Supervisors signed a Memorandum of Agreement between the County of Albemarle and
the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation. The agreement provides a grant to the Department of Engineering to supplement
a storm water and nonpoint source pollution study being sponsored by the County of Albemarle, City of Charlottesville, and University of
Virginia. The grant outlines sixteen milestones, ranging 1Ì"om data collection on best management practices to education and outreach activities
for pollution reduction. The grant is for a two-year term beginning October 1, 1993 and ending on September 30, 1995.
DISCUSSION:
The remaining $10,754.52 grant balance needs to be reappropriated to complete activities.
RECOMMENDATION:
StafIrecommends approval of Appropriation #95014 in the amount of $10,754.52 as detailed on attached form.
950l4.WPD
95.140
..
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95014
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FY 95/96 FUNDING FOR SOIL AND WATER GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1154041055520100
1154041055950012
POSTAL SERVICES
SOIL & WATER-DWP PROJECT
$200.00
10,754.52
TOTAL
$10,954.52
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2154033000330310
EPA-DIV SOIL & WATER DWP
$10,954.52
TOTAL
$10,954.52
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
ENGINEERING
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
;(if-~:~
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~-i3lJ -,?..>
)Þ'-~;Ø~
...
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
GENDA TITLE:
eensight Funding Request
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
Distnb¡,¡ted kI Boild: ¡7-/-J?;,
Ag~ Itern No J?.5:¿t',P¿J/5.
INFORMATION:
UBJECTIPROPOSAURE UEST:
equest from Teensight for $14,000 to partially offset
eduction in federal Job Training Partnership Act (JTP A)
nds.
ACTION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
ATTACHMENTS:
TAFF CONTACT:
ucker, White
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
Teensight is a program that provides long-term training and counseling to at-risk youth in the community to enable them to become
productive members of the community. The majority of their funding is derived from federal Job Training Partnership Act (JTP A) funds,
although the County provides an additional $19,600 for an expanded program for teen-mothers at the three county high schools. Due to
federal funding reductions instituted this summer, Teensight has lost $184,000 in a second year grant from JTPA and is requesting a
one-time grant of $14,000 from the County to help offset this loss offederal funds, which is approximately 60% of their budget. The City
of Charlottesville provided a $20,000 emergency grant to Teensight in June, 1995.
DISCUSSION:
Attached for your review is a copy of Teensight's request, which describes the purpose and scope of their program and several of the efforts
underway to help offset the shortfall in their FY 1995-96 funding. Page 4 of their request provides a breakdown of the participants by
locality, and page 5 provides a brief description of the current Albemarle participants in Teensight II, their long term training component
of the program.
With welfare reform initiatives and mandates on the horizon for Albemarle County, Teensight is providing a valuable service to the
community in either helping at-risk youth to become independent of public assistance or to prevent them ever needing to receive public
welfare. The program also attempts to focus on longer term training that will help these youth secure jobs beyond minimum wage and,
therefore, enabling them to remain self-sufficient.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Teensight's funding request in the amount of $14,000 for several reasons. The program has been viable and
successful for three years and has provided preventative services targeted towards building self-sufficient adults, a priority focus in human
services at this time. It also seems short sighted to reduce training opportunities offered to at-risk youth in the community in the face of
impending welfare reform measures that will demand these types of programs. However, since the long-term training component of
Teensight has not been reviewed by the Program Review Committee in any detail prior to this request, staff would recommend that only
half of the total appropriation be distributed to Teensight at this time with the remaining $7,000 to be allocated in mid-year contingent on a
positive review by the Program Review Committee in December. This review would monitor the quality of the program, the impact of the
program on Albemarle residents, and Teensight's success to date in securing other funding resources.
TEENSUM.SAM
95.148
. ' ...
Proposal to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
FOCUS Women's Resource Center requests that the Albemarle County Board of
Supervisors provide an emergency grant of $14,000 to bridge the one-year gap in
funding for the FOCUS TEENSIGHT program.
(Note: The $14,000 is proportionate with the emergency grant provided to
TEENSIGHT by the City of Charlottesville in June 1995 based on number of
County residents receiving services.)
Background:
The TEENSIGHT program of ~~OCUS Women's Resource Center has been in
existence since 1989. Over the last 3 years. TEENSIGHT has served 155 youth
residing in Albemarle County. Attached for your information is a breakdown by
locality of the 535 clients served by TEENSIGHT from 1992-1995.
The TEENSIGHT program (I. II, III, IV) provides long-term training for at-risk youth
in Planning Districts Nine and Ten. The purpose of the program is to assist youth
in becoming economically independent, competitive in the job market, and
contributing members of the community. TEENSIGHT is welfare reform that
works and achieves sustainable life strategy changes. The following facts show
some of the successes of the program:
. From September 1990 to June 30, 1994 TEENSIGHT served 486 teen
mothers in seven area high schools.
· The national average for teen age mothers completing high school is
50%; 90% of the TEENSIGHT seniors graduated or earned GEDs.
~ The national average for repeat pregnancies within two years of the
birth of the first child is 40%. During 1990-91 the TEENSIGHT
repeat pregnancy rate was 10% and in 1993-94 the rate was down to
3%.
~ In the 1993-94 program year 91 % of those served qualified as low-
income and in the 1994-95 program year 80% qualified as low-
income.
. The TEENSIGHT long-term training program served 533 individuals since
1989.
~ 340 have successfully completed the program.
~ Of those completing the program, 292 (86%) have entered
employment.
~ Of those employed, 93% continue in the jobs provided through the
program and a majority are earning above minimum wage salaries.
~ 67 at-lisk youth are currently enrolled .in the progn~m.
· During the 1993-94 program year, TEENSIGHT III served 19 homeless teens
from the City of Charlottesville. and TEENSIGHT II served 3 homeless teens
July 21, 1995
from Albemarle County.
. 19 were placed in housing.
· 14 were assisted in finding employment.
. 7 were enrolled in skills training.
Current Situation:
In May 1995. FOCUS was informed that $184.000 in federal Job Training
Partnership Act (JTPA) funds would be cut from the second year of the
TEENSIGHT contract. These funds are administered and distlibuted through the
Plivate Industry Council (PIC). The cut was tied to the federal rescission package
before the Congress. President Clinton vetoed the first version of the rescission
bill. and the Congress immediately revised the bill to satisfy President Clinton's
objections. The reduction of JTPA funds remained in the second bill. which is
expected to pass in late July.
The $184,000 in JTPA funds are not available for release to TEENSIGHT for the
second year of its contract. TEENSIGHT has to look to alternative funding
sources. The program can be maintained for the 1995-1996 program year with
$71.000. Services will be reduced. but the program will remain at effective levels.
TEENSIGHT is a valuable resource in reducing economic dependence and in
breaking the welfare and teen pregnancy cycles. Welfare reform is on the horizon
for Albemarle County. Every elTective service program will be needed to implement
welfare reform in our community. Letting a proven program disintegrate when we
are on the blink of a greater need seems short-sighted.
FOCUS and TEENSIGHT have taken a proactive approach to finding $71,000 to
sustain the TEENSIGHT program in a viable form and complete the training and
education commitments to the at-lisk youth already in the program. The following
funding has been secured to bridge the $71.000 gap in program resources:
A pro rata share of JTPA uncommitted funds
City of Charlottesville emergency grant
Passed in June 1995
$ 15,500
20.000
An individual scholarship to CATEC
Individual donations from fliends of FOCUS
500
300 (to date)
----..---..------
$ 36.300
In addition, TEENSIGHT is holding a special FOCUS Flea Market sale July 28-30
with the proceeds going toward the $71,000 blidge. The goal for the sale is
$10,000.
July 21. 1995
Page 2
c . ' "
FOCUS made a public appeal to its membership and the public in the Summer
1995 newsletter, InFOCUS. TEENSIGHT has been highlighted in a local radio call-
in show, a short-take on PBS, and the Helping Hands feature in The Daily
Progress, as well as filming a segment for the United Way Campaign video. Finally,
FOCUS is preparing a comprehensive public awareness campaign for release in
late August.
The following funding remained unchanged by the federal rescission:
Gender equity funds
JTPA (adult services)
County of Albemarle Teen Parent
Programs in 3 high schools
City of Charlottesville (child care)
$ 35,000
58,000
19,615
13,000
FOCUS and TEENSIGHT have proposals in process for collaborative programs.
These programs would not only sustain the existing program elements in
TEENSIGHT, but would expand the programs to make TEENSIGHT even more
effective in its stated purpose. Proposals in progress are as follows:
A collaborative program with Children. Youth
& Family Services Child Health Partnership and MACAA
Proposed Amount
$ 10.000
A collaborative program with Western Albemarle
High School aimed at keeping youth in school
or pursuing aGED
To be determined
A collaborative program aimed at plimary teen
pregnancy prevention
To be determined
A Family Self-Sufficiency Program for youth
who reside in public housing
To be determined
A model program, based on TEENSIGHTs
successful strategies, for the Public Welfare
Foundation to disseminate to communities for
infonnation and adaptation
To be determined
TEENSIGHT staff are also exploring possibilities for cooperative or contract
programs with Culpepper. Fauquier, Orange. Greene, and Madison Counties to
provide assistance with pre-employment skills training and job placement for
welfare recipients being affected by the welfare reform.
July 21. 1995
Page 3
·
BY TEENSIGHT 1992-95
1992-1993 TS II TS I, III, IV Total
Charlottesville: 50 40 90
Albemarle: 12 30 42
Fluvanna: 4 12 16
Greene: 14 9 23
Louisa: 3 20 23
194
1993-1994
Charlottesville: 35 55 90
Albemarle: 13 43 56
Fluvanna: 4 4 8
Greene: 10 6 16
Louisa: 1 19 20
190
1994-1995
Charlottesville: 34 49 83
Albemarle: 15 42 57
Fluvanna: x 1 1
Greene: 4 6 10
Louisa: x 0 0
151
(199) (336) (535)
- page 4 -
,
The TEENSIGHT II program is a long-tenu training program for at-risk youth in Planning Districts Nine and
Ten. The purpose of the program is to assist youths in becoming economically independent, competitive in the
job market, and contributing members of the conullw1Îty. TEENSIGHT II teaches individuals life strategies that
enable long-tenu success. The program provides resources and encouragement to finish high school or get a
GED; works with participants to develop specific objectives and employment goals; establishes a vocational and
academic training program; and finds funding resources to achieve that training and education program. Finally,
TEENSIGHT II provides job placement and assists in achieving sueccssful workplace transition.
In most cases, Û1C first order of business for the TEEN SIGHT II program is to stabilize the life of the youth. The
staff, through one-on-one proactive intervention, works with the teen to address immediate basic needs to include
housing, clothing, food, transportation, and child care. Only after thcre is some stability can the long-ternl
training progranl and development of life strategies begin. This phase of the program typically involves 40 hours
of counseling and assistance per individual; and in more complex cases can take two to three times that long.
TIle next phase of the program is intake and assessment. All youth in the program receive an objective
assessment of skills, interests, aptitudes, experience and employability. TEENSIGHT uses a computer based
system and identifies strengths and weaknesses. Using the findings of the assessment, an Individual Service
Strategy (ISS) is developed through a one-on-one collaborative process betwccn TEENSIGHT counselors and
youths. The result is a clear employment goal, specific objectives, and a schedule for completion. TI1Îs phase of
the program requires on average 5 hours per individual.
TIle next step is teaching pre-employment and work maturity skills. These skills are the foundation for success
in the workplace. TIley begin the process of orientation to the expectations and requirements of the workplace
with straight forward ideas to include being on time and how to dress. TIlis phase of the training also teaches
complex concepts to include
problem solving on the job site and effective communications. Pre-employment and work maturity skills training
requires 20 hours per individual.
Once the ISS has been devcloped, TEENSIGHT II counselors set about finding funding resources to support
bOÛl Ûle vocational training and the academic training within Ûle individual plan. Sometimes finding resources is
easy and takes only and hour or two. Other times the process takes longer and the counselors have to be creative
and look for new resources. TEENSIGHT continually searches for alternative fWlding sources for training.
Tuition and training funds come from a myriad of sources to include the TEEN SIGHT II program itself.
Vocational and academic training take place simultaneously fostered by TEENSIGHT staff support, While the
youths are in training, TEEN SIGHT II staff are not on the sidelines, they arc involved. TIley serve as role
models and mentors and consistently provide encouragement so crucial to success and so often lacking in the
lives of at-risk youth. They also provide practical support, for example, more than once a counselor has gone to
provide needed transportation at 5:00 a.m. to help a participant meet an obligation or r~sponded to the newly
acquired self-confidence and sense of accomplishment of a YOWlg, single mother by accepting her invitation to
Sunday dinner.
The final phase of the TEENSIGHT II program is job placcment. Counselors are continually cultivating the
employment market. An established goal of the. program is to provide job placement for youth on completion of
their training. TIle intention of job placement is to find employment that, first and foremost, uses the newly
acquired skills and secondly, provides wages that allow financial independence. TIle program's 93 percent job
stability rate demonstrates that TEENSIGHT is effectively matching skills, job requirements, and people. Since
1989, TEENSIGHT has placed 292 individals and the majority of these individuals are earning above minimwll
wage in jobs with advancement potential.
- page 5 -
r
TEENSIGHT" PARTICIPANTS (Albemarle County _ JUly, 1995)
SEX # CHILDREN AGE WELFARE/INCOME HIGHEST GRADE TRAINING
F
1
20
PUBLIC HOUSING
F
1
F
18
POVERTY LEVEL
POVERTY LEVEL
1
F 1, and
PREGNANT
20
21
AFDC/FOODST AMPS 12
F 4
21
AFDC/FOODST AMPS 12
PUBLIC HOUSING
M
21
POVERTY LEVEL
F
1
F
18
FOODSTAMPS
1
20
AFDC/FOODST AMPS 11
F 1
20
FOODST AMPS
11
F PREGNANT
17
POVERTY LEVEL
12
F PREGNANT
18
POVERTY LEVEL
9
F
1
F
19
AFDC/FOODSTAMPS 12
1
F
20
POVERTY LEVEL
12
1
F
20
AFDC
19
8
POVERTY LEVEL
F
12
1
20
AFDC/FOODST AMPS 12
F PREGNANT
18
POVERTY LEVEL
11
31 APPLICANTS FROM ALBEMARLE COUNTY ON WAITING LIST
- Page 6 _
11
12
12
MARTHA JEFFERSON
CA TEC NURSING
ARCHITECT/PVCC
TEACHING/PVCC
TEACHING/PVCC
12
12
BUSINESS/NA TlONAL
BUSINESS COLLEGE
COMPLETED PVCC
ATTENDING UVA
MURRAy H.S
CERTIFIED NURSING
ASSISTANT
CA TEC/COSMET_
OLOGY
POLICE SC/ENCE/
PVCC
GED
PVCC
TEACHING/PVCC
CA TEC/NURSING
PHYSICAL TRAINING
PVCC
INTERNA TIONAL
BEAUTY SCHOOL
MURRA Y H.S.
NURSING CERTlF.
,
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95027
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDITONAL FUNDING FOR FOCUS-TEENSIGHT PROGRAM.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100059000566210
FOCUS-TEENSIGHT
$7,000.00
TOTAL
$7,000.00
REVENUE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2100051000510100
GENERAL FUND BALANCE·
$7,000.00
TOTAL
$7,000.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
//~3-'?~
//- ß-:Þ' S-
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95062
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
ADDITONAL FUNDING FOR FOCUS-TEENSIGHT PROGRAM.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100059000566210
FOCUS-TEENSIGHT
$7,000.00
TOTAL
$7,000.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2100051000510100
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
$7,000.00
TOTAL
$7,000.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
~£b¿,
+if~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
ffE::L:[~4~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
,/
.''f
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Appropriation of Public Safety Grant
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
Distnbuted k> Board: ?-;/-/~
~8~Tt6Ç¿1?t7/ 5ß
ACTION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Request approval of Appropriation #95019 in the amount of
$10,388.17 for the Virginia Connections - Traffic Unit Expansion
Grant.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Yes
~
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Miller
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The County of Albemarle has been experiencing rapid growth especially in the areas of retailing and residential development. This growth has
placed increasing demands on the County Police Department. Major areas of demand are traffic related. In 1992, a Traffic Unit was
established. A $16,839 DMV grant for the period October 1, 1994 through September 30, 1995 was received to expand the Unit to a more
i\mctionallevel byOOding overtime for traffic checkpoints, selective enforcement, and education operations. A $10,388.17 balance remains
to be appropriated for the period July 1, 1995 through September 30, 1995.
DISCUSSION:
The overtime work to be perfonned by the County of Albemarle Police Department will be funded by the $10,388.17 balance of this Federal
Grant. There are no local matching requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of an appropriation as detailed on attached fonn 95019.
95019.WPD
95.149
./ # 'Ifr'
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95019
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FY 95/96 FUNDING FOR TRAFFIC UNIT EXPANSION GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1153031145129900
1153031145210000
1153031145300205
REIMBURSABLE OVERTIME
FICA
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
$8,086.72
618.45
1,683.00
TOTAL
$10,388.17
2153033000330306
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
FEDERAL GRANT
$10,388.17
TOTAL
$10,388.17
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
POLICE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
~bðh>
~ ~
~-/,-~ç
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~/~//,~~
~& ø~<~
/'
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
,l
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITI .E:
Appropriation - Lambs Road Project
AGENDA DATR:
September 6, 1995
~-?5
DIstr¡bute!V~. R:
~trnda Itern No. _j?~ ¿:1,fí't1Y 5p
INFORMATION:
ACTION:
SlTl\JECTIPROPOSA T.!REQUEST:
Request approval of Appropriation #95020 in the amount of
$6,810 for the Lambs Road project.
CONSRNT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
STAFF CONTACT~~):
Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Ms. White
REVTF.WRD BY:
BACKGROIJND:
In February 1995 the School Board approved the granting of an easement to the Virginia Department of Highways for improvements to the
intersection of Lambs Road at Hydraulic Road and the northeast side of Albemarle High School.
DISCUSSION:
In exchange for this easement, the School Division received payment in the amount of $6,810. This request is to use these funds to replace
and replant shrubbery and trees in the affected area, reinstall the parking lot light and to install curb and additional sidewalks on the east
side of the entrance to Lambs Road.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Appropriation #95020 as detailed on the attached form.
95020. WPD
95.141
.' .~
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95020
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
CAPITAL-SCHOOLS
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
LAMBS ROAD PROJECT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1900062420800685
VDOT-LAMBS ROAD PROJECT
$6,810.00
TOTAL
$6,810.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2900051000510100
FUND BALANCE
$6,810.00
TOTAL
$6,810.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
p-~~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~~;?-;Ø:=;-
_..Þ ,
I..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Old Brook Road Pathway Appropriation
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
ITEM NUMBER,\,::;7.,/- ~
Disuibutec1 ~ ¡jO¡rC1: "7" - ""
Agenda Iteff! No. ;;;?~t?~II'/.Ff?
INFORMATION:
ACTION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAIJREOUEST:
Request approval of appropriation #95021 in the amount of
$6,686 for Old Brook Road Pathway
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
~
(
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Mr. Tucker. Ms. Hi .
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION:
InFY94-95 $15.250 was appropriated to coosIruct two segments of asphalt pathway to provide a continuous pathway system. on the west side of Old
Brook Road (Route 653) to Rio Road. At the time this project was approved. the least expensive alternative that was funded was to construct the
asphalt pathway outside the VDOT right otway by acquiring an e8GPn'11'nt to cross private property. Subsequent to the appropriation. a property owner
decided 1bat due to the impact to their property. they would not grant an ea........ent, which will require the pathway to be constructed directly adjacent
to the road. In doing so. the pathway will be located in VDOT's right-of-way and VDOT requires curb and gutter due to the site specific drainage
problems. The revised project costs are:
1156 feet of 4 foot wide pathway
532 feet of concrete Curb and Gutter
Smveying and easements
Vehicle Crossing Sign
Relocation of fire Hydrant (3')
Contingency
Total ProJed coat S21~36
$9958
$10,108
5500
570
5300
$1000
S21~36
Leu FY95196 appropriation
hqulred addtlonal tunda
$15.250
$ 6,686
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of appropriation #95021 in the amount of $6,686 for the additional costs for the Old Brook Road Pathway from the
remaining CIP fund balance from other projects.
OLDBK.EX3
95.137
-
-\
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95021
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
CAPITAL-GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
OLD BROOK PATHWAY PROJECT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1901081010950002
OLD BROOK PATHWAY
$6,686.00
TOTAL
$6,686.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2901051000510100
FUND BALANCE
$6,686.00
TOTAL
$6,686.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
ENGINEERING
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~£/9~
~/ //2
Ó'~æ~ '
. ~
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
[$ ... 3d -.1's-
~-'/-:Ø~
~ '"
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGRNnA TITT ,R:
Appropriation - Miscellaneous School Grants
AGRNnA DA TF.:
September 6, 1995
TTF.M NTTMRRR:
Distrihuted 10 Boi~d: ....2d.::~
.4ieTrdt Item No. /~P',Øp'/ Sf!)?
INFORMATION:
ACTION:
STII\JF.CTIPROPOSA T ./RRQJTF.ST:
Request approval of Appropriation #95022 in the amount of
$14,198.64 for the reappropriation of Environmental Education
Grant and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Grant,
and the appropriation of funds received for
the Artist-in Education Residency Grants.
CONSF:NT AGRNnA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
A TT ACRMRNTS:
STAFF CONTACT'~):
Messrs. Tucker, Castner, Breeden, Ms. White
REVTRWF:D BY:
BACKGROTTNn:
At its meeting on August 14, 1995, the School Board approved the following requests for appropriation and reappropriation.
DTscnSSTON:
· The reappropriation of the Enviromnent1Ù Education Grant for Hollymead Elementary School in the amount of $5,000. The funds
will be used to continue the project, "The Outdoor Classroom" for the 1995-96 school year. Students will be involved in all phases
of the project requiring them to use critical-thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making skills.
· The reappropriation of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Grant for Woodbrook Elementary School in the amount
of $1,998.64. These funds will be used to continue the project which is designed to kindle interest in the NCTM Standards,
provide information and encourage interest with parents and students in our schools in grades K-3.
· The appropriation of the Artist-in Education Residency Grants for Cale Elementary School in the amount of $5,494.00 and
Hollymead Elementary School in the amount of $1,706.00. These grants will center upon activities that develop awareness of
AfŸican arts that have influenced and will contime to influence culture in America, promote a positive attitude toward African arts
and culture, provide opportunities and encouragement through training in the performing arts for children and staff to expressively
reflect upon our culture's connection to Mrica, and share artistic performance processes and products with the community served
by the school including students, parents and others.
RRCOMMRNnA TION:
Staff recommends approval as detailed on appropriation fonn #95022.
95022. WPD
95.145
.;
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95022
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
X
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
X
FUND
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
VARIOUS FY 94/96 SCHOOL GRANTS.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1310460205600000
ENVIRONMENTAL GRANT-MISC. MATERIALS
$5,000.00
1310460212601300
MATHEMATICS GRANT-INSTR. MATERIALS
1,998.64
1310460214312500
1310460205312500
ARTISTS IN RESIDENCY-PROF SVCS INSTRU
ARTISTS IN RESIDENCY-PROF SVCS INSTRU
5,494.00
1,706.00
TOTAL
$14,198.64
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2310424000330113
2310451000510100
2310424000240285
2310424000240284
ENVIRONMENTAL GRANT
FUND BALANCE
VA COMM ARTS #96-0161
VA COMMARTS #960139
$5,000.00
1,998.64
5,494.00
1,706.00
TOTAL
$14,198.64
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
4t'-~'-'Z.s-
;f'?- /'~ ~
"
~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITT .F.:
Appropriation - Education
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
ArTION:
SIII\JF.I:TIP"ROPOSA T JIlF.QIJEST:
Request approval of a reappropriation in the Education Division
in the amount of $1,000 as detailed on appropriation fonn #95023.
rONSF.NT AGENDA:
ArTION: X
INFO"RMATION:
A TT ArHMENTS:
STAFF rONTArT'~):
Messrs. Tucker, Castner, Breeden, Ms. White
"REVIEWED BY:
BArKG"ROITNn:
At its meeting on August 14, 1995, the School Board approved the following transfer of funds.
DIsrUSSION:
During the School Board's retreat on June 19, 1995, the School Board voted to increase the Superintendent's stipend for automobile travel
by $1,000 for FY 1995/96.
"RErOMMENDA TION~
Staff recommends approval of this transfer as detailed on Appropriation #950023.
95023.WPD
95.146
,
\
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
95/96
NUMBER
95023
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
SCHOOL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
AUTO STIPEND FOR SUPERINTENDENT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1241062120160200
1241090610999981
STIPENDS-NON INSTRUCTIONAL
SCHOOL BOARD RESERVE
$1,000.00
(1,000.00)
TOTAL
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
$0.00
TOTAL
$0.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
~Lð~
~Ú'/~
~
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
f? -';0 -7S
:? -~;;P"::;-
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MEMO TO:
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance
FROM:
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC
DATE:
September 8, 1995
SUBJECT:
Appropriations Approved on September 6, 1995
At the Board's meeting on September 6, 1995, the following appropriations were
approved:
Appropriation Form #95022 for funding of various FY 1994-96 School Grants in
the amount of $14,198.64.
Appropriation Form #95023 for Auto Stipend for Superintendent in the amount of
$1,000.00.
EWC:len
Attachments (2)
cc: Kevin Castner
I
L
'" -1
ALBEMARLE COUN1Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
DATE:
August 17, 1995
FROM:
Robert w. T~: ~r:, County Executive
Kevin Cast~Dlvlslon Superintendent
Request for Appropriation
TO:
RE:
At its meeting on August 14, 1995 the School Board approved the
following appropriation requests:
o The reappropriation of the Environmental Education Grant for
Hollymead Elementary School in the amount of $5,000.00.
The funds will be used to continue the project, "The Outdoor
Classroom" for the 1995-96 school year. Students will be
involved in all phases of the project requiring them to use
critical-thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making skills.
o The reappropriation of the National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics Grant for Woodbrook Elementary School in the amount
of $1,998.84. These funds will be used to continue the project
which is designed to kindle interest in the NCTM Standards, provide
information and encourage interest with parents and students in our
schools in grades K-3.
o The appropriation of the Artist-in Education Residency Grants for
Cale Elementary School in the amount of $5,494.00 and Hollymead
Elementary School in the amount of $1,706.00. These grants will
center upon activities that develop awareness of African arts that
have influenced and will continue to influence culture in America,
promote a positive attitude toward African arts and culture,
provide opportunities and encouragement through training in the
performing arts for children and staff to expressively reflect upon
our culture's connection to Africa, and share artistic performance
processes and products with the community served by the school
including students, parents and others.
o The reappropriation of $1,000.00 from the School Board Reserve
category to the administration category. During the School Board
retreat on June 19, 1995, the School Board voted to increase the
Superintendent's stipend for automobile travel by $1,000.00 for
FY1995-96.
It is requested that the Board of Supervisors amend the appropriation
ordinance to receive and disburse these funds as displayed on the attachment.
/smm
xc: Melvin Breeden
Ed Koonce
Ella Carey
".
Revenue
2-3104-24000-330113
Expenditure
1-3104-60205-600000
Albemarle County Public Schools
Appropriation Request FY95-96
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION GRANT
Environmental Ed. Grant
Miscellaneous Materials
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS GRANT
Revenue
2-3104-18120-181210
Expenditure
1-3104-60212-601300
Revenue
2-3104-24000-240285
2-3104-24000-240284
Expenditure
1-3104-60214-312500
1-3104-60205-312500
Expenditure
1-2410-90610-999981
1-2410-62120-160200
Nat'l Council of Teachers
of Mathematics
Instructional Materials
ARTISTS IN EDUCATION RESIDENCY GRANTS
Va. Comm. Arts #96-0161
Va. Comm. Arts #96-0139
Prof. Svcs.-Instructional
Prof. Svcs.-Instructional
AUTO STIPEND FOR SUPERINTENDENT
School Board Reserve
Stipends-Non Instructional
$1,998.84
$1,998.84
$5,494.00
$1,706.00
$5,494.00
$1,706.00
- $1,000.00
+ $1,000.00
· .
, . , --~-;/-??.Ç"
'ff N ~,Ý'¿?~ .::S7
--.........". '.""""""".~.
.I -,.
ABG~ FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
¡\¡I"I" I
roo Box 314
~
~T~
nFLCA~1I'. MARYL/\'\[) 2Il'l~
-1ll1.SìS 7-112
FAX -110· 2ìJ ")2-1
~f661 ~
August 8, 1995
Mr. G. Robert Richardson
Corporate Trust Department
Nations Bank
Post Office Box 26904
Richmond, Virginia 23261-6904
Re: Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.)
Dear Mr. Richardson:
Enclosed please find a copy of ABG's Monitoring Report for the
above referenced property.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
~:&- '11 .
Sheila H. MO~
Project Monitor
/shm
enclosure
cc: Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC
.0 '( . [......, ....¡(ÎAI SERVICEc IN(
/\0"'_:),'<1','.__' _. ,).,. ,..
ABG MONITORING REPORT
SECTION 103(b)(4)(A)
DATE:
June 9, 1995
PROJECT NAME:
Arbor Crest Apts. (Hydraulic Rd)
LOCATION:
101 Arbor Crest Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS:
66
TOTAL NUMBER OF LOW/MODERATE
INCOME UNITS REQUIRED:
REQUIRED PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL LOW/MODERATE UNITS:
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS
CURRENTLY OCCUPIED:
14
20%
66
TOTAL NUMBER OF LOW/MODERATE
CURRENTLY OCCUPIED:
18
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL LOW/MODERATE
OCCUPIED UNITS: 27%
MANAGEMENT AGENT:
Summit Realty Group, Inc.
4801 Radford Ave., Ste. 104
Richmond, VA 23230-3541
COMMENTS:
Thirteen low/moderate lease files were reviewed and found to be
in good order.
Arbor Crest is required to hold 14 units (20%) available to
low/moderate income tenants. Currently, the property is
maintaining 18 units (27%) and is therefore in full compliance
with the bond program requirements.
REVIEWED BY: Kathleen A. Cooke
l .",'
ABG" FINANCIAL SERVICES. [NC.
August 8, 1995
~
~T~
()¡$thlàwii\Ì ~ ~¡¡, f? -/ -?~
PO Bl)X J14 ~ It.nr N<, ~~:.~_
BEU 'AMI', MARYLAND 210lì
41,L \ì\· ì412
FAX 4!l1- 27, lì)24
4:'995
Mr. G. Robert Richardson
Corporate Trust Department
Nations Bank
Post Office Box 26904
Richmond, Virginia 23261-6904
Re: Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.)
Dear Mr. Richardson:
Enclosed please find the Bond Program Report and Monthly Report
Pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Deed Restrictions for the month
of July 1995.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me
at 410-575-7412.
Sincerely,
~7I.~
Sheila H. Moynihan
Project Monitor
/shm
enclosures
cc: Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
"'
. ....
Effective July 31, 1995
MONTHLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 7(a) OF THE DEED RESTRICTIONS
TO: ABG Associates, Inc.
300 E. Lombard Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
RE: Hydraulic Road Apartments - Aroor Crest Apart:Irents
Charlottesville, Virginia
Pursuant to Section 7 (a) of the Deed Restrictions (the "Deed
Restrictions"), as defined in an Indenture of Trust dated as of
April 1, 1983, between the Industrial Development Authority of
Albemarle County, Virginia (the "Authority"), and your bank, as
trustee, the undersigned authorized representative of
Richmond-Albemarle Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited
Partnership (the "Purchaser"), hereby certifies with respect to
the operation and management of Hydraulic Road Apartments,
Charlottesville, Virginia (the "Project"), that as of the date
shown below:
1) The number of units in the Project OCcupied by
lower income tenants is 17 .
2) The number of units in the Project unoccupied and
held available for Lower Income Tenants is -0-
.
3) The number of units rented and the number of units
held available for rental other than as described in
(1 ) and (2) is 49.
4) The percentage that the number of units described in
(1) and (2) hereof constitU~~%of the total number of
units in the Project is . .
5) The information contained in this report is true,
accurate and correct as of the date hereof.
6) As of the date hereof, the Purchaser is not in
default under any covenant or agreement contained
in the Deed Restrictions or in an Agreement of Sale
dated as of April 1, 1983, between the Authority and
the Purchaser.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersign~d has signed this Report as of
August 4, 1995
RICHMOND-ALBEMARLE LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, a Virginia
limited partnership
By: .~~~ ff ¿~
A horized Repr sentative
", -... BONO PROGRAM REPORT
Month July VMr ~
Property: Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.) P . 051-35371
ro,.ct .:
Loc.tion: Charlottesville, VA Numb., 01 Unit. 66
Submln.d by: Loretta Wyatt August 4, 1995 Effective 7/31/95
J.4.~~r C.T.
Total Occupied 66
I. LOwt" INCOME Bond OCcupied 17
The rallowlng unlll "'~ ~n dC'slg~l.d &s "tow., Incom." unlls
2 Arbor Crest Dr 21 Betty Meador
41 61.
2 4 Arbor Crest Dr 22 Beverly T. Lane 42
62.
3 6 Arbor Crest Dr 23 Wilma M. Atkinson 43
63.
4 7 Arbor Crest Dr 24 Florence Lee Carey 4C
64.
5 9 Arbor Crest Dr 2S Virginia Burton 45
6~.
6 12 Arbor Crest Dr 26 G, Robert Stone 4ð
ðð.
7 14 Arbor Crest Dr 27 Betty L. Reed 47
87.
a 20 Arbor Crest Dr 28 Evelyn Mandeville 4a
6a
9 30 Arbor Crest Dr 29 Mary Cox Allen 49
6e.
10 44 Arbor Crest Dr 30 $am Atherton 50
70.
11 56 Arbor Crest Dr 3t Violet DuCharme
~1 71.
12. 76 Arbor Crest Dr 31 Ann G. Saylor ~2
72
13 78 Arbor Crest Dr 3J Ernest M. Nease SJ
73.
14 84 Arbor Crest Dr J4 Juanita Boliek 54
74.
IS 90 Arbor Crest Dr 3S Betty B. Elliott ~S
7S.
16 94 Arbor Crest Dr 36 M. Eileen Knick ~
76
11 106 Arbor Crest Dr )1 Katherine T. Nowlen
~1 77
18 Ja ~. 7a.
19 39 !l9 7t.
20 40 60 ao
T ~ cn.n~s from plC'VIOUS IC'POrl If·flecled in It\. .bov. "sling 'r.
Oelellona A6d 111 one
92 Arbor Crest Dr H Dorothy H. Reese
".
1 12 2 12.
3 13 3 13
.. 14 4. 14.
S 1S 5 15.
6 16 6 18
7 .. 17 1 17.
I 18 8 18..
I 19 9 1t.
10 20 10, 20.
,~
.t
's., ~I'¡;e(. ~ .1ciw: .L-/-~
.~r..,.", ;'f"(f' ¡.¡ ,_.f?¿¿:::'$?~ 5cP
0'
.4
"''''i
,. .
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902-2013
A.G.TUCKER
RESIDENT ENGINEER
August 22, 1995
Current Projects
Construction Schedule
Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Ms. Carey:
Attached find the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently
under construction in Albemarle County. Please see that this information is
forwarded to the Board of Supervisors members. I will be prepared to discuss this
matter with them at the next meeting if they so desire.
Sincerely,
t4i!:::t!o/«
AGT/smk
attachment
cc: R. W. Tucker, Jr. w/attachment
David Benish w/attachment
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
.- _ t.
Projects Under Construction
Albemarle County
September 1, 1995
I Route Location Status Estimated
ì
i No. Compo Date
29 From Hydraulic Rd, (Rte. 743) Construction 89% Complete Dec 95
ToN. of Rio Road (Route 631)
240 Route 240 Bridge Replacement Construction 42% Complete Dee 95
Near Int. Route 250
!
I 1-64 Bridge Repair - Various Locations Construction Complete Sep 95
I
29 Fron N. of Rio Road (Route 631) Construction 19% Complete May 97
To S. Fork Rivanna River
i
I 671 Bridge Replacement Construction 22% Complete Nov 95
I At Millington
!
* Revised Date
** New Project
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINld}nL..iliJd ~ Bo¡¡d: J?:/-/5'
.. It.m No. ~¿:7~~¿ 5/,/
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
PO BOX 2120
RICHMOND 23216-2120
August 11, 1995
Mr. Kevin C. Castner
Superintendent
Albemarle County Public Schoojs
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Castner:
Your application for support under Tide I of the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994, as amended by
Public Law 103-382 for school year 1995-96, has been approved for the amount of $550.000.00.
This project is expected to be operative from Julv 1. 1995 to SePtember 30. 1996. per information contained
in your application and has been assigned STATE PROJECf NO. 002-96-1.
Please follow the instructions listed below when requesting reimbursement under Public Law 103-382, Tide
I, (Educationally Deprived Children - LEA CFDA 84-010A):
· Submit reimbursements monthly.
· Send original and one copy of reimbursement to our office.
· Attach supporting documentation e.g. travel expenses, invoices, etc. to original reimbursement.
· Make one copy for your meso
If you should have questions, please feel free to contact us at (804) 225-2901 or (804) 225-2869.
Sincerely,
G~ ~d!'\
Office of Compensatory Programs
~
GHI:SCJr:hmt
Enclosure
copy:
Francine W. Hughes, Tide I Coordinator
,/ Chairman, Board of Supervisors
""
-.....
",. .\ . ". ;:.. d' J?7'-~
:;ISt¡lil~lOO iJ OO¡I . -.,. -...
Imn No 1£~¿P¡JJ¿_ ~¿~OFFICE
.~ .. . 2241 RAYBURN OFFICE BUILDING
12021225--2815
THOMAS J. BULEY, JR.
7TH DISTRICT, VIRGINIA
CHAIRMAN. COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
Q:ongrrss of thr ianítrd ~tatrs
iROUSf of 'RfprfSfßtatíofS
Ð'Jashíngton, Ð(t 20515-t607
August 25, 1995
DISTRICT OFFICES:
SUITE 101
4914 FITZHUGH AVENUE
RICHMOND, VA 23230-3534
(804) 771-2809
1-18001-438-3793
CULPEPER OFFICE PARK
SUITE 207
763 MADISON ROAD
CULPEPER, VA 22701-3342
17031 82!H!960
Ms. Ella W. Carey
Clerk
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
Dear Ms. Carey:
Thank you for forwarding a copy of the resolution adopted by
the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors in support of the James
Madison Commemorative Coin Act. I appreciate you bringing this to
my attention.
I am pleased to report that this legislation has 29 cosponsors
and that similar legislation in the Senate, sponsored by Senator
Warner, has 14 cosponsors. If enacted, this legislation will do
much to preserve Madison's legacy. Lastly, I have enclosed a copy
of a letter I sent to my fellow Representatives urging them to
support the James Madison Commemorative Coin Act.
With kindest regards, I am
Sincerely,
i'
ll.{. t. "'-..-__
Thomas ~. Bliley, Jr.
Membe~ of Congress
TJBj/aco
enclosure
l
...
THOMAS J. BULEY, JR.
7TH DISTRICT, VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON OFFICE:
2241 RAYBURN OFFICE BUILDING
12021225-2815
CHAIRMAN, COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
Q:ongress of the tlníted ~tates
'!Rouse of Reprcscntatiocs
flJashington, ÐQ: 20515-1607
DISTRICT OFFICES:
SUITE 101
4914 FITZHUGH AVENUE
RICHMOND, VA 23230-3534
18041771-2809
1-(8001-438-3793
CULPEPER OFFICE PARK
SUITE 207
763 MADISON ROAD
CULPEPER, VA 22701-3342
17031 825--8960
HELP PRESERVE JAMES MADISON'S LIFE-LONG HOME. MONTPELIER
May 23, 1995
Dear Colleague:
March 16, 2001 will mark the 250th anniversary of the birth
of one of our country's greatest statesmen, public servants, and
founding fathers, James Madison. As the legislator who currently
occupies the Congressional seat once held by James Madison, I
urge you to join me in sustaining his legacy. By signing on as a
cosponsor of "THE JAMES MADISON COMMEMORATIVE COIN ACT" you can
help preserve his memory and his home, Montpelier, for future
generations.
James Madison's life history chronicles the birth of the
united States. Throughout his life, Madison served his new
nation in virtually every legislative capacity -- as a delegate
to the Constitutional convention, a member of the Virginia House
of Delegates and the Continental Congress, Member of the House of
Representatives, Secretary of State, and fourth President of the
united States. Regardless of his legislative responsibilities,
Madison always returned to his home at Montpelier and he remains
buried there today.
Please join me and the members of the Virginia Delegation in
working to ensure our children can enjoy Montpelier and continue
to study Madison's legacy. This coin will result in no loss of
revenue for the federal government and all proceeds from the
James Madison Commemorative Coin will go to preserve, restore,
and protect Montpelier. If you would like to become a cosponsor,
please let me know or contact Cameron OBrion at 52815.
Ofstrib41tJ<Î k¡ ~¡J. ?::L.. -)?5
~ It.m No. ~¿1"~./." 5/.3
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
H. Alexander Wise, Jr., Director
Department of Historic Resources
221 Governor Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
August 23, 1995
Mrs. F. Palmer Weber
!\13.!vern F:;:.~
Route 3, Box 162
Charlottesville, V A 22903
Date of LÏsting
08-04-95
RE: Malvern, Albemarle County
Dear Mrs. Weber:
This is to inform you officially that the above property has been entered in the National Register of Historic Places.
I am sure that this news is gratifying to you, and we share in your pleasure.
If you have any questions about the National Register, we would like to hear from you.
Sincerely,
~~~
~lie L. Vosmik, Director
Division of Survey and Register
JLV/sdm
c: The Honorable Walter F. Perkins, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director, Planning Department
Jacquelyn Huckle, Chairman, Planning Commission
Nancy K. O'Brien, Executive Director
Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission
Melinda Frierson, Albemarle County Historical Society
Geoffrey B. Henry, Preservation Consultant
TELEPHONE: (804) 786-3143
TDD: (804) 786-1934
FAX: (804) 225-4261
A n Equal Opportunity Agency
-
Distr:!.¡ulefJ ~ ~d. ~-~~
~ ¡tern No ¿?~ P'f!'ð.::' .f/~
George Allen
Governor
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Office of the Governor
August 25, 1995
The Honorable Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
40 1 r-.1:cr~tire Ro~d
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
Dear Mr. Perkins:
A top priority of my administration is to empower the citizens of the
Commonwealth to advance their own economic futures. One of the best ways for
people to create jobs for themselves is through self-employment microenterprises.
Therefore, it is with great pleasure that I announce that the Commonwealth is offering
Virginia Economic Development Corporation a Virginia Enterprise Initiative Grant in
the amount of $70,000.
Twenty-four proposals for funding were received, and Virginia Economic
Development Corporation is one of fifteen applicants selected to participate in the
Initiative. This effort will provide over $1 million in grants and technical assistance
funding to be matched with $4 million from local private and public partners.
This initiative will be an important measure in providing microenterprise loans
to persons who are willing to take risks and become self-sufficient. I wish the
applicants every success in their efforts with this opportunity.
With wann regards, I remain,
Sincerely,
GA:cef
c: Mr. Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
County Administrator
County of Albemarle
State Capitol · Richmond, Virginia 23219 · (804) 786-2211 . TDD (804) 371-8015
,
,
!)is1nQ.¡,¡ltKi k¡ bid: ~/ -/.:?:
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLr Item Nû. ¿?;f~fJ'4/s/~
r
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
1995-96 Work Plan for the COWlty Development Departments
AGENDA DATE:
Sepember.6,1995
ITEM NUMBER:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Work activity scheduled and completed for FY95-96
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION: X
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Thekec, Huff. Cilimberg, Higgins. Hurt. McCulley
REVIEWED BY:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
BACKGROUND:
Last year was the first time the Work Plan for the Albemarle COWlty Development Departments was distributed to the relevant
boards/commissions, development community, and interested public. This informational listing is intended as a means of assessing and
prioritizing the many items which occupy the COWlty Engineering, Inspection, Planning & Zoning Department's time and resources. This
comprehensive annual report is broken into four easily identifiable categories: 1) the alphabetized work item 2) the lead department & any
supporting departments 3) the expected outcome/product and 4) the anticipated time schedule.
This product is intended as a communication tool to the many "customers" that the COWlty'S Development Departments serve. To keep all
interested parties infonned and up to date, the work plan will be revised and made available yearly. The time frames noted are estimates based
on the latest obtainable information and are subject to change without prior notice as workloads and priorities shift.
DISCUSSION:
COWlty staff modified the format of this year's edition to make it even more user friendly and plan to distribute copies earlier in the fiscal year
to better facilitate its use. The work plan is provided for your information and review.
RECOMMENDATION:
No action is needed since the work plan is provided for informational purposes. Comments and suggestions are welcome.
95.147
.
of
~
..
.......
".
0":
'-
1995-96 WO
PLANS FOR
ALBEM RLE
COUl y
DEVELO [ENT
DEPART NTS
I
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The 1995-96 Work Plan schedule for the Albemarle County Development Departments is designed to provide the development community
and interested public with a comprehensive annual report documenting the many items which occupy the County Engineering, Inspection,
Planning & Zoning Department's time and resources. This infonnationallisting is intended as a means of assessing and prioritizing the
County's workload, and does not represent a mandated schedule. The work plan is broken into four easily identifiable categories:
1) the work item 2) the lead department & any supporting departments 3) the expected outcome/product and 4) the time schedule.
This product is intende<l as a communication tool to the many "customers" that the County's Development Departments serve. To keep all
interested parties infonned and up to date, this work plan will be revised and made available yearly to all appropriate Boards, Commissions,
staff and interested public. The time frames noted are estimates based on the latest obtainable infonnation and are subject to change without
prior notice as workloads and priorities shift. Please call the department listed below if you have any concerns or questions regarding a
specific work item.
Number
804-296-5861
804-296-5832
804-296-5823
804-296-5868
Phone
Deoartment
Engineering &
Inspections
Planning & Community Develop.
Zoning
Public Works
Head
J 0 Higgins
Jesse Hurt
Wayne Cilimberg
Amelia McCulley
t.
Coun
1995-96 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS (revised 8/28/95)
..
ACSA JURISDICTIONAL AREA PIe As Required - - - - - - - - - - - -
AMENDMENTS
.
AGRICULTURAUFORESTAL P As Required - - - - - - - - - - - -
DISTRICI' REVIEWS
APPLICATION REVIEW P/ilz/e Meet review deadlines X X X X X X X X X X X X
- (Zoning Map Amend., Special Use Pennit
Amend., Site Dev. Plans, Subdivision Plats)
-Access. Tourist Lodging, Home Dce., Sign Z Meet review deadlines X X X X X X X X X X X X
Pennits, Bus. Clearances, Variances, ARB
BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS
-Streamline Pennit Process IIz Increase productivity & expedite penIÚt issuance by 50% X X X X X X X X X X X +
-Building Pennit Review Team IIz Implement new policies, procedures and training X X X X X X X X X X + X
I=lnspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept.. Lower Case=Secondary Dept., +=product delivery
E=Engineering, F=Fire Rescue,
1995-96 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS (revised 8/28/95)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
& PROJECfS
-FY96-97 Project Requests and Plan PÆ Assist in administration of process and recommend plan to PC X X X X +
.
- WindhamlJannan Gap Channel II E On Hold
(CIP Appropriation)
-Four Seasons Basin E Dedicate & Design/Bid X X X X X X +
(CIP Appropriation)
- Woodbrook Channel E Evaluate Project Alternatives X X X +
(CIP Appropriation)
·Peyton Basin E Dedicate & Design/Bid X X X X X X +
(CIP Appropriation)
-Lickinghole Retention Basin E Final Closeout ffransfer to RWSA X X X +
(CIP Appropriation)
·New High School E Acquire Site & Design/Bid X X X X X X X X X X +
-Avon StlRt. 20 Connector E Alignment & Design/Bid X X X X X X X X X X +
-Berkmar Drive North Extension E Traffic signals completed and accepted into VDOT System X X X X +
-Greenwood School Evaluation Disposal E Disposal report received by County Executive X +
-Street Lights (planning Initiated Projects) E/p On Hold for policy
-COB Renovations E As-builts completed X X +
-Route 29 Plantings Z Facilitate planning & planting X X X X X X X X X X X X
2
I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead DepL Lower Case=Secondary Dept.. +=product delivery
E=Engineering, F=Fire Rescue,
r
1995-96 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS (revised 8/28/95)
.
..
-Hydraulic Road Sidewalk E Acquire easements 1Ì"Om property owners X X X X X X +
.
CATSUPDATE
-Projects (Roads, bicycle, pedestrian, mass P Development for MPO approval late 1996 X X X X X X X X X X X X
transit
COMMITTEE PARTICIPATION
-Program Review P Participation in budget committee X X +
-Hwnan Services Planning P Participation in staff committee X X +
-Housing P Assistance to committee and Housing Coordinator X X X X X X X X X X X X
-PACC Tech Pie Participation in committee X X X X X X X X X X X X
-Water Resources Committee EIp Member participation X X X X X X X X X X X X
3
Letter=Lead Dept.. Lower Case=Secondary Dept., +=product delivery
I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap.
E=Engineering, F=Fire Rescue,
1995-96 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS (revised 8/28/95)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
-Scattered Site Meetings (Land Use Plan) P Hold Meetings +
-Phase II Comp Plan P Recommendation to pè X X X +
-Historic Preservation P/z Recommendation to PC X X X X +
-Mountain Protection P/z Recommendation to PC X X X X +
-Land Use Plan P Recommendation to PC for Public Meetings; Public Hearing X X + X +
by PC
-Amendments to Comp Plan P As required - - - - - - - - - - - -
DEVELOPMENT DESIGN MANUAL E/p/z On hold due to workload
-Serious Driveways EIp/z On hold as of 1/95
-Tree Planting Specs Z Draft Manual to Planning Commission X X X + X X
4
Letter=Lead DepL Lower Case=Secondary Dept.. +=product delivery
I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap.
E=Engineering, F=Fire Rescue,
r
1995-96 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS (revised 8/28/95)
'"
,.
DOCUMENTS
-Development Activity Report P Annual Report X X X +
,
-Building Report (Incl Accessory Housing) P IzIi Quarterly and Annual Reports + + + + +
-Infonnation Sheet P Annual Report X +
-Annual Report ZiP Reports to BOS X X +
-CIP Financial Report E Mid and Year-end report to BOS X X + X X + X X
-Infonnation Handouts for Applications Z Developing & distributing handouts for the public which X X X X X X X X X X X X
explain application processes and necessary contact persons
ENFORCEMENTIINSPECTIONS II7Æ Ongoing review and training for inspection procedures X
-Update status of all open building permits Uz Verification that all projects are in compliance with the X X X X X X X X X X X X
building code
-Subdivision Road Acceptance E On-going field inspection X X X X X X X X X X X X
-Target violation sweep Z As need arises investigate; i.e. signs, etc. X X X X X X X X X X X X
-Site Approval Conditions Z Detennine compliance with specific site requirements X X X X X X X X X X X X
5
I=Inspections, P":,,Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept., Lower Case=Secondary Dept.. +=product delivery
E=Engineering, F=Fire Rescue,
1995-96 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS (revised 8/28/95)
-Serious Driveway InspectionslEducation Z Procedure for plan review and for inspection under current X + X X X X X X X
regulations
-Tree Cutting Z Evaluate change in procedure to allow cutting in limited X X X X X X X X X X X X
circumstances
.
FIRElSAFETY
-Access Policy:> 50 or more lots P/ile Recommendation to PC for Resolution of Intent X X X +
-Fireworks Pennit Z Written Procedure X +
-Fire Prevention Ordinance F/p Draft ordinance to BOS X X X +
FISCAL IMPACT MODEL P Complete and incorporate in Comp Plan and Zoning Map X X X X X X X X X + X X
Amendment Reviews
GRAPIDCS AND MAPPING
-Tax Map Updates P Complete in coordination with Real Estate Department X X X +
-Building Locator P/i Bring on line and implement system X X X +
-Aerial Photography PIe RFP and contract award, contract management and X X X + X X X X X X X +
deliverables
6
E=Engineering, F=Fire Rescue, I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead DepL Lower Case=Second8l)' Dept., +=product delivery
f'
.1995-96 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS (revised 8/28/95)
.,.
.
-Development Tracking System prúve Continued development X X X X X X X X X X X X
-GIS Development P/e/z Program development and priorities for FY 19%-97 budget X X X X +
.
mSTORIC RESOURCES SURVEYING P Assist state/consultants X X +
INDUSTRIAL ACCESS PROJECTS
-QuaiIRun/UREF E Project Complete /3 yr bonded project X X +
-GE Fanuc E To CTB for approval/facilitate design + X X X X +
METRIC SYSTEM TRANSmON Elp Policy decision and Implement deadlines X X +
NEIGHBORHOOD/AREA STUDŒS
-Hollymead P Recommendation to PC X X X
-BirdwoodlFaulconer P Recommendation to PC X X X X X X +
7
I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept.. Lower Case=Secondary Dept.. +=product delivery
E=Engineering, F=Fire Rescue,
1995-96 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS (revised 8/28/95)
.. /. ", < ".;" , "", h"',' . "i/';' .;, n>; i ." ", ", j;:tJ:; )i; i; i" ,ii qiiY"žtiiîf%ì¡';': ""v:, 'fY1fJ1r¡¡¡ "?
. . ""V'" ,...bt"~,&vn~JU,,b'~ ." "". . ., - 0,"" "",~. v,~.'Þ ,J.!."v ." . "'t· ~'" AI.
...,..:,..;>..,....,..~..,.;T',~".'.1.".il'.·.·.w'i'T.·.·'~,:; .:,. . ...: ..y.,,.,.:.:..;;~..;.....~. .'. ::...,.... '::.:~·;qw·~ý/..:';:;A
,""" ""w, ".. Ji'3, "'" ''''v, ." . .,.. ',,'.',". . . ... ,'v' lA· 'r~ :i' ·
. . . ,.... , . ^.. -: '..:. ..'.. ..':...:.:.:. '":: .'.';." .:. .. J . ....!t '... .:....... ..... ...: .. :.. . ..:,. ..:.~. .:::. ::::. ..~ .::..... :..:...<...~:.>::.~!..:......: :.:.::::.:;~:.·::::i1 ð!t:~j ~m ~:?:~t )ý~:
. . ," . ...' ... t ....... . .... .. ....., .,. ..... . .' ......,.. ,'.....'! , ,I···· J...
o ',.. , ", " ':" .." ~:. ,','; ~;:.:' ......:::.....' '. .......:::.:. . .....:.. ',. ,': .,': '.~..":.,:::, ..:....:......:..::~~:::..: ~...:..:\... .....':::::~ :":::X::,:::~? ':':~~~: .:~~"'.;~:.;,-:.:
NOTICE/APPEAL CLARIFICATION ZJP Draft Amendments to PC in Oct. X X + X X X
- - -
-Public hearing signs Z Design sign, adopt ZTA & office procedures to begin use X X X +
- - -
.
- - -
- - -
PUBLIC EDUCATION/CLIENT ALL Educate developers, builders & public by participating in X X X X X X X X X X X X
FEEDBACK seminars, conferences, community/organizational meetings as
well as providing materials for publication
- -
- -
PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITIES
AUTHORITY
- -
-RPD Easement monitoring P Annual report to Authority X +
- - -
-Staffing assistance p Review rural preservation easements - - - - - - - . - - - -
- - -
- - -
RECORDS MANAGEMENT
- - -
-Centralized Filing lIP Feasibility report for equipment installation X X X + X X X X X X X X
- - -
-Ruling File System Z Review current files and detennine system. X X X X X X + X X X X X
- - - -
r
E=Engineering, F=Fire Rescue, I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead DepL Lower Case=Secondary Dept., +=product delivery 8
-1995-96 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS (revised 8/28/95)
"
.
-Court Case File System Z Determine system. X X X + X X X X
-Establish Condition Tracking System Z Determine system (Violations, SP, etc.) X X + X X
-Development Code Index Z Update Development Code amendments as of March 1st X X X X X X X X + X X X
-Land Use Matrix Z Update as needed. X X X + X X X X X X X X
-Establish data base for ARB Z Data base in place X X +
-Establish data base for Signs Z Data base in place X X X X X +
-Building Pennit Files I Accurate data base of all building permits X X X + X X X X +
ROAD ABANDONMENTSN ACATIONS Pie As Required - - - - - - - - - - - -
SITE REVIEW PROCESS ALL Internal process review to Red X + X X X + X X X X X X X
SOLID W ASTEIRECYCLING
-Illegal dumping task force E/z Recommendations to Board of Supervisors X X +
9
I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept.. Lower Case=Secondary Dept.. +=product delivery
E=Engineering, F=Fire Rescue,
1995-96 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS (revised 8/28/95)
:. :. ; :.::~i:ÄQ".;-.~·'",·:WJ.. ··:';"ilt1~f.:~y!:œjj~;,j,··· . .~h0.jÒ> ':c.::. :... :. ;€i1i1;~\iÙ>:~~i~1~ri;(_~·" ~'_f\\,>if8*Yd1N;":
·If· . .....".."."".,,,. .... ...... .,..... '.'.....'.ÿ"".."......, ..~ ";«$.~" ·v ... .. ... .. . .."... ..··"'M· ~~%..., .'.
"' ~,,<<:i}:t:'~hk~~"'H~¡·0;jJl1~>.i.ní~:;-...~· :.;~ ~ .:...:. . ..... . ~~Æ'^'~:J·:-: ·····.:·;::·:·t:'··;···..>::·· :~~ q:~·1 ::.·~~J.d~ ...
" ~. .:v:....../.'~:-.y... ~>'':'>..' .".... v....~....;. ., -...'>; ......;<:T.... ...x» ~:-. ::: . . ." '... .~.., .. .. .....'. .".. . ~ ~... '. . "'M!:"'$: .
: ..~'..~.: .,.: ,.:. . :.:.: :.:.::.::~. ...:: . ,:..:....:..:... .::..:'..;:~:..¡~/\::.~:.:::...:;.) .:.....:..)~. . ·:.··:i· . r·: .:. .::..::.:.. ·::.::::)::::!::.:::~if~~::J:..;~::::.·..:·:: ..:...:: :..:. .:..:.}:;;:...:.:::::~.~.;:.::;,:;.~;):\.:;);>;:,;::.~::~·~<::·::.::·="·::?~¡f~~~~~;;~~r;r:·· ;~i~¡1.~~i~~j'
STAFF TRAINING - PROFESSIONAL ALL Train staff in equipment and procedure for their work areas X X X X X X X X X X X X
DEVELOPMENT and those related (e.e. noise meter, etc.)
- -
. - -
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT E Moores Creek Program operational I Meadow Creek study X X X + X X X X X + X X
PLAN/STUDY results
- -
-Consolidated Water Ordinance E/p Focus Group / Draft Ordinance X X X + X X X X X X X X
- -
- -
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE P Compilation of revisions ongoing pending completion of rec. X X X X X X X X X X X X
to PC (follows work to be completed on Housing Comm. rec.,
ACSA Mandatory Connection, Fire Ord., Serious Driveways,
Consolidated Water Ord. & Administrative Review)
- -
-Family Divisions P Review for amendments to reflect state code enabling X X +
legislation and recommend to PC for Resolution of Intent
- -
- -
TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS
- -
-MPO Technical committee PIe Member participation and project/administrative support X X X X X X X X X X X X
- -
- TSMlFunctional Classification Study P MPO adoption +
- -
-Six Year Road Plans (secondary and primary) P Recommendations to PCIBOS X X X X + X X +
- -
-Meadow Creek Parkway Study PIe Revised traffic modeling and alignment report to PCIBOS for X X X X X + X X X +
I funding consideration in 1996 6-yr. Primary Road Plan
Pvt/public cooperation on ROW dedication
- -
f'
E=Engineering, F=Fire Rescue, I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept.. Lower Case=Secondary Dept., +=product delivery 10
J995-96 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS (revised 8/28/95)
.
.
ZONING TEXT & COUNTY CODE
AMENDMENTS
-BaS & PC Initiated PIZ As required - - - - - - - - - - - -
.
-Grading Site Plan Zip/e Additional staff research requested by BaS x x x x x X
-Administrative Review Process P Status to PC for decision to codify X X X X X X +
-Mise, Policy (ex. heliports/airstrips, parking P/z Review Ordinance, listing of priorities and recommendations X X X X X X +
requirements) to PC
-Mise. Administrative Zip Review Ordinance, listing of priorities and recommendations X X X X X X +
to PC
-Production Agriculture (hog fanns, feed lots, P Recommendation to PC for Supplementary Regs. X X X +
etc.)
-Commercial Agriculture (wayside stands, P/z Recommendations to PC X X X +
fanner's market, commercial stables)
-Noise Regulation & Code Amendment Zip Ordinance to PC in AprillMay, then on to adoption and X X X X X X X X X + X X
implementation
-Sign Ordinance Zip Part I Ordinance Revisions to PC X X X + X X X X X X X X
-Home Occupation: Class B P/z Recommendation to PC for Resolution of Intent X X X X +
-Housing Committee Recommendations P Recommendations following Comp Plan review X X X X
-ACSA Mandatory Connection Policy P To follow policy adoption by ACSA Board X X X X +
-Critical Slopes PIe Recommendations to PC for Resolution of Intent X X X X X +
11
I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept.. Lower Case= Support Dept.. +=product delivery
E=Engineering,
1995-96 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY
~:: ~::""":>':...~:::" : '::. ::;:,:,.....:.:~:::::.~..~.....,,:.: :::. ::':.. ;::':,::" ~. ::':-": r· . ,':.::' '., .. .,.
-ARB Admin. Review, etc. Z Draft ZT A X X + X X
-Temporary Events lJp{1Ie Review for regulation and procedure (fireworks, Christmas X X X X X + X X X X X X
trees etc.)
,
~
12
Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept.. Lower Case= Support DepL +=product delivery
g,I
gm
.
.
£
""~+..h .. .~ ... ...~..,". c:;í'-;/""-,?'.s
lJl;ufiw>íieu ai iJII,WI.u. -L___
....,. it.!1t Nv . ;?£~¿;:r¿( Þ ij
w
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
R ivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hal!
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO:
Board of Supervisors
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC evJt7
DATE: September 1, 1995
FROM:
SUBJECT: Reading List for September 6, 1995
Page 1 to Page 13 (#7b) - Mr. Perkins V
Page 13 (#7b) to Page 25 (#14b) - Mrs. Humphrisl~
Page 25 (#14b) to Page 39 (#20) - Mr. Marshall
Page 39 (#20) to End - Mr. Bowerman~/
~nuary 11, 1995 - Mr. Martin ~
March 15, 199=(1) Page 1 to Page 14 (#9) - Mr. perkins/
Page 14 (#9) to End - Mrs. Thomas (/III rid)
June 2, 1993 -
June 28, 1995 - Mr. Martin
August 9, 1995 - Mr. Marshall
EWC:mms
*
Printed on recycled paper
.
.
.
.
.
,
~
March l5, 1995 (Regular Night Meeting)
(Page lO)
opinion. Mr. Cilimberg said staff requested the Parks and Recreation Depart-
ment's assessment of the open space property.
Mr. Martin said Mr. craig stated, as part of the proffers that he would
maintain the home in a historic nature. He asked Mr. craig to speak to the
outbuildings that were referred to by Mr. Evans. Mr. Craig said he would like
to save as many of the outbuildings as possible. He will save the western
most outbuilding which appears to be the oldest on the property which will be
part of the pool area. He would be happy to donate any outbuildings that have
to be torn down for someone to come and pick up, free of charge, in a timely
manner to reassemble, save or store. At least two of the old outbuildings
will be saved. Mr. Marshall asked if the building will be saved and main-
tained on the property. Mr. Craig said "yes."
Mr. Perkins asked about the issue of water. The first time this Board
knew about the water problem was when it received the minutes of the Rivanna
Water and Sewer Authority (RWSA) which stated that ConAgra has continued to
increase its consumption of water. He understands that this need could be met
with an increase in the water plants capacity, but there is no problem with
the water source itself. Mr. Cilimberg said RWSA did not see this development
creating a public water problem. Mr. Tucker said he does not feel there is a
problem and the issue has not been discussed by the RWSA Board of Directors.
He knew about the problem at ConAgra and RWSA is working with them to solve
that problem, but in terms of actual supply, he does not believe that is an
issue.
Mrs. Thomas said a memorandum received by the Board states that these
projections (ConAgra's) coupled with the planned residential growth will
probably exceed the water treatment plants production capacity of l.O million
gallons per day. The report goes on to say that they have engineering plans
whereby they can increase the water capacity to 1.3 million gallons per day.
Although this has not been done in the past, increases in plant capacity does
cost the users. Mr. Tucker said he does not think the memorandum was speaking
directly about this development. Mr. cilimberg commented that RWSA normally
does its overall water and sewer projections based on a build-out scenario.
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Perkins said this is not an easy decision. He has resided in Crozet
since 1968. When he first moved there, the issue was the sewer interceptor
line. The 1977 Comprehensive plan talked about· Crozet having 13,000 people by
this time; that has not occurred. The Comprehensive Plan also spoke about
this connector road. The Highway Department does not have the money to build
the road and he thinks this Board is looking at a developer or industry to do
the work. He thinks this proposal does some of the things that the County,
through the Comprehensive Plan, stated should be done and built in the area.
He agrees that there is a conflict between the Comprehensive Plan and the
Crozet Study. He thinks it is important that there be another access to Park
Street. The present homes have only one access. He thinks this Board is
getting its "cake" with this proposal. The railroad bridge is something that
this Board has looked at for a long time. He also thinks this plan addresses
the importance of putting as many people as possible in the growth areas,
rather than the rural areas. There are some bad things about this proposal,
but it seems that the good outweighs the bad.
~-1
Mrs. Thomas~aid she agrees that there are some good-things about this
proposal. She thinks the proposal has improved since the Commission's
recommendation, but there are many more improvements that could be made
working with the realization that this is going to bea growth area in the new
Comprehensive Plan. There are many questions as to whether this proposal is
appropriate with the present designations~in the Comprehensive Plan. Also, at
issue is whether this use is appropriate given what the community has put
together as a thoughtful design plan for the commun~ty. She thinks approval
of this proposal is premature. Many of the residents recognize that this is
an area that needs careful development. Staff has/convinced her that this is
an appropriate plan for this section of Crozet given that there are going to
be other developments near it that have not been reviewed in the context of
the Comprehensive Plan. She thinks the Board should defer this request to
allow further work by staff and Commission as it develops the Comprehensive
Plan. This will improve the proposal so that it is something that the
developer, community and this Board can be proud. She thinks this is a
crucial decision for how Crozet will develop the eastern edge of its growth
area.
Mr. Marshall asked if a decision is deferred, how could it be different.
Mrs. Thomas said the community speaks in terms of streets instead of roads
that are straight and intersecting, so that there is a town feeling rather
than a feeling of one more subdivision, mixed use so that they can be devel-
oped with commercial use, residential use of various types and various housing
costs so that more affordable housing is actually included, rather than houses
in a narrow price range. There are a number of interesting elements in the
Crozet Community Plan that this Board approved to pass on to the Commission.
She feels there are better ways for a town to develop. This is what the
Commission, the staff and the developer can work through to bring something
better forward, if given the time.
Mrs. Humphris said what Mrs. Thomas and the residents are saying is that
there may be a better way for this development to be done that would be more
pleasing to more people and make it a better place to live. This Board is
being asked to change what the Comprehensive Plan recommends and leap frog
I
c I tla.ut"=>
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCILc~~ fiiL~dfd cW-
¡¡)II,r{\ {:I):~ rlh' f-"/!! 1)(lìJP!l'ììl J\ Ft C1\/,(}\h \ nl~\iì!l"\
STATEMENT PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SITE REVIEW COMMITTEE
BY BABETTE THORPE
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
I recently learned that the site review committee has recommended some changes to
the way in which site plans and plats are reviewed in Albemarle County. I would like
to address two issues relating to these changes and the current development review
process. The first is a proposal to eliminate the regularly scheduled public site review
meeting. The second is the question of how better to involve the public in the process
of development review.
Elimination of Site Review Meetings
Until a year ago, I represented the Zoning Department on the site review committee
and I remain familiar with the process. I also attended the Roundtable discussion
mentioned in the staff report, and agree with many of the concerns I heard expressed
there by developers.
These concerns can and should be addressed without abolishing the one regularly
scheduled meeting open to the public at which site plans are discussed and many
fundamental land use decisions are made. The developers and consultants should be
able to respond at the meeting to comments they receive from various agencies. The
developers and consultants should also receive the written comments before the
meeting to prepare them for what they will hear. The site review meeting itself should
be restructured to allow a time slot for each project, so that a developer and his
consultants can show up at the appointed time, rather than wait all morning for a
hearing. Putting into place these improvements would streamline the process and
make the meeting more meaningful and efficient for the developer and his
consultants, without excluding the public from the process.
Abolishing the site review meeting, rather than modifying it may cause more
problems than it would solve. Currently staff in the development departments know
that every other Thursday is site review day, and that their written comments must
be turned in to Planning within a certain number of days of that meeting. This
structured schedule simplifies the tracking and review of projects and facilitates co-
ordination and communication between reviewing agencies. Eliminating this
structure and allowing project review schedules to vary with each project will
complicate the process and undermine coordination and communication-possibly
increasing problems for developers as well as adding to staffburdens.
4'1 Horncr Stlu·t, Bo:\ 4('lì, Warrc!1tun, Virginia 221861703-147-23 H/Fa:\ HlJ-9003
1111 R,1'l' lid! IJri\l", SUitt' I, Ch;lrluttc;;vdle, Virgini;¡ 22903/S04-lJ77-2033/F;¡:\ lJ77-6306
Statement to Board of Supervisors
September 6, 1995
Page 2
In addition, anyone who has tried to accommodate the vagaries of individual daily
calendars to schedule meetings will realize that scheduling independent reviews for
each project represents a scheduling nightmare. It should be expected that
substantial additional staff time, either at the expense of other elements of the work
program -or taxpayer funds-will be needed if the existing structure imposed by the
regular site review meeting is sacrificed to individually scheduled project reviews.
Public Involvement
Rather than spend a lot of money listing site plans on the Internet and running bigger
ads in the local newspapers, I suggest that the County follow the City's lead, and
invite adjoining landowners and citizens' groups to the site review meetings.
According to a City planner, both the developer and the public are allowed to speak at
site review meetings. The committee chairman briefly describes the purpose of the
site review meeting, and makes it clear to citizens that they are not there to debate
the merits of a particular project, but to see that it meets the design standards set
forth in ordinances. Issues which can become a real problem if left to the certificate
of occupancy stage, such as whether to screen with a fence or a row of trees, are
worked out during the site review meeting. Despite this participation, the average
review meeting in the city lasts only about two hours for three to four projects.
These changes should streamline the process for the developer, while keeping the
public informed and maintaining a structured and relatively efficient approach to the
development review process. The site review meetings offer an important
opportunity for balanced review of development projects. They are too valuable an
opportunity for face-to-face contact between staff, developers and consultants, and
citizens to be eliminated.
-.-
t
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Executive
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296·5841 FAX (804) 972-4060
November 16, 1995
C. Timothy Lindstrom, Director
Piedmont Environmental Council
1111 Rose Hill Drive, Suite 1
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Dear Mr. Lindstrom:
On September 6, 1995, the Piedmont Environmental Council through Ms. Babette Thorpe made a
presentation to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors regarding possible modifications to the
County's site review process. These recommendations for modifications had resulted ITom several
months of work by a team of the Site Review Committee charged with the evaluation of the site
review process and were made in consideration of shortcomings in the existing process identified by
consultants, developers, members of the public and staff. This site review team (SRT) endeavored
to modify the development review procedure so that it might become more productive for the
departments and agencies of the Site Review Committee, as well as the applicant, while ensuring the
public remained infonned and had opportunity for meaningful participation.
The undersigned who were responsible for the charge given the SR T are concerned that Ms. Thorpe
did not present accurately the intent of the SR T's recommendations and created unnecessary
confusion among some members of the Board of Supervisors. If the SRT had been infonned of the
concerns prior to presentation, the confusion and misunderstanding may possibly have been avoided.
The contribution of your organization and others is greatly valued and provides many benefits to our
public service. As always, there is an open invitation to your organization to meet with us, review
our files and discuss your concerns in advance so that all parties clearly understand the issues.
Differences of opinion are part of the public process and are welcomed. Misstatements of facts and
intentions only serve to cause confusion and serve as a drag on the decision-making process.
Specifically as to the PEC presentation made to the Board of Supervisors on Sept 6, it was inaccurate
in terms of the proposed format of the site review meeting and was misleading in conclusions about
public information. The SRT had made several recommendations relating to the site review meeting,
none of which would decrease citizens' knowledge of and access to design comments. Typically
citizens do not currently attend the site review meeting because public notice usually does not occur
until later in tb,; I nJcess. With this in mind, the SR T considered the following:
Mr. C. Timothy Lindstrom
November 16, 1995
Page 2
1. Reformatting the site review meeting so as to set a specific schedule;
2. The site review meetings are technical meetings which, due to their technical nature, do not
lend themselves to general public information;
3. These meetings are held early in the process when details are preliminary and comments are
preliminary. The plan and the comments are subject to possible substantial revision. This
could be confusing to citizens. For example, a neighbor hears a comment in the site review
meeting that a proposed use involving the storage of flammable liquids is not going to be
served by adequate fireflow. Later investigation shows that a different hydrant from another
line can obtain higher and acceptable fireflow.
4. There is great benefit in allowing a Planner to provide one-on-one contact with the public.
That Planner can "interpret" concerns and function as a liaison with other agencies. For
example, a neighbor can express concerns about drainage. The Planner works with the
Engineering Department and attempts to identify a possible resolution.
5. The City site review process is not a close comparison. They have fewer plans and agencies
and very different regulatory discretion. For example, they may review 3-4 items at a meeting
while the County can see up to twice as many at a given site review meeting. It would be
potentially lengthy and unmanageable to add citizen hearing time as a scheduled portion of
the County's meeting.
6. Site review is almost exclusively ministerial in the legal nature of the review. Direct and
uninformed participation in site review may further the myth that development can be
"stopped" purely by neighbors' opposition.
The SRT made the recommendations noted in the attached Executive Summary to the Board of
Supervisors. You will note that there is no recommendation to eliminate the Site Review meeting
as was implied by Ms. Thorpe's presentation. In fact, the attempt is to create a more substantative
meeting with individual review items given a scheduled time so that time is not wasted for those
attending. Furthermore, there is recommended a more focused and meaningful process of public
notification and exchange ofinfonnation. This erroneous implication seemed to cause great concern
and, ftom our perspective, did a disservice to the presentation made by Ms. Joseph. Claritying this
issue and again extending an offer for open dialogue on these issues is the point of our
communication.
., , r
Mr. C. Timothy Lindstrom
~ovember16, 1995
Page 3
Once again, the efforts ofPEC and others to participate in and comment on these matters of public
interest are greatly appreciated. The undersigned only ask that there be open communication and
discussion of concerns so that these issues are properly considered and represented with the decision-
makers. Hopefully, this can help to clarify any misunderstandings. We would welcome your
questions or additional thoughts.
Sincerely,
í?JwJ-é 4¡f
Richard E. Huff, II
Deputy County Executive
O. iL
V. w~er/:::l~,
Director OfPlanning~nity Development
~ÌL if. 1AÆf~
Amelia G. McCulley V'vL
Zoning Administrator
J~
Jo M. Higgins
Director of Engineering
'2zM
VWC\
pc: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Albemarle County Planning Commission
\-Æbemarle County Site Review Team
Ms. Babette Thorpe
Je e R. Hurt
¡rector of Building Inspections
O1arlottesviUe
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
September 7, 1995
Charles S. Martin
David P. Bowennan.
R ivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
Whit. Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
ScottsviJle
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
The Honorable Robert E. Martinez
Secretary of Transportation
Chairman, Commonwealth Transportation Board
1401 East Broad Street, Room 414
Richmond, Virginia 23219
RE: Western Bypass-Interchanges at Barracks Road and Hydraulic Road
Dear Secretary Martinez:
At its meeting on September 6th, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors unanimously and
strongly opposed any study of or construction of interchanges at Barracks Road or Hydraulic Road
along the western bypass alignment. The Board believes that, if built, the bypass should truly be a
limited access alignment, with access only at planned termini (U.S. Route 29). This will prevent it
from becoming, in the future, a local arterial as most bypasses have become.
Historically, the Board of Supervisors have opposed interchanges along this proposed bypass route
and, with the action taken on September 6th, they are reaffirming previous Board's opposition to this
proposal and study. Should you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely,
l.1J iÞì1tà ;:¡llLk~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFP\
95.021
pc: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Commonwealth Transportation Board
*
Printed on recycled paper
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
. f::r:i \...) 1]0/ '-)- _....~\
o t:;? _./ .~., ,c) ¡""..>'IB¡:::::S
N ". ,c. -:"1" -. ¿;::....s-
.-,,, ..................."........"""".
,:?3:~,f?/b: tb~
AGENDA TITLE:
Western Bypass Press Conference Update
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAIlREOUEST:
Review for your information and possible action,
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
AITACHMENTS:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs, Tucker,Cilimberg,Wade
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
On Tuesday August 15th, 1995 at the Transportation Research Council auditorium, the Virginia Department of Transportation held a press
conference to address the Route 29 Bypass design, plarmed public involvement in the design process, and the design landscaping components.
Present at the meeting were members of the Commonwealth Transportation Board, representatives of VDOT's central, district, and local offices,
and members of the design consultant team. A copy of the Press Release available at the conference is attached (Attachment A).
DISCUSSION:
The two main goals stated at the press conference were: (1) comrmmication and public involvement, and (2) building a Bypass that is sensitive
to the Charlottesville/Albemarle community,
Other Information Presented Included:
-Approximately $40 million dollars is programmed over the next four years for Bypass R. O. W and engineering.
- Total estimated cost of the Bypass is $100 million.
-Nine properties have been purchased to date by VDOT.
-It is estimated that 30 to 40 properties may have to purchased by VDOT.
-Citizen participation meeting is plarmed for Spring 1996.
-Public hearing on road design is plarmed for November 1996.
-Construction plan is to be completed in December 1996.
-Complete R-O- W acquisition Fall 1998.
- The maximum cost for the consultant team is $7.4 million.
-It is estimated that 200 miles of roads in Albemarle County are currently in the S. Fork Rivarma Reservoir watershed.
The traffic analysis for the Western Bypass will be totally re-evaluated as part of the project. The consultant team will evaluate the traffic impact
only of hypothetical interchanges at Hydraulic and Barracks Roads as part of this process. The results will be presented at the public meetings.
As the Board of Supervisors directed. the Bypass is not being designed to have interchanges at either Hydraulic or Barracks Roads. Please fmd
attached excerpts fÌ'om the Final Environmental Impact Statement indicating the County's opposition to interchanges (Attachment B).
RECOMMENDATION:
The Board of Supervisors may want to discuss its position regarding interchanges at Hydraulic and Barracks Roads and communicate to VDOT
and the Commonwealth Transportation Board any concerns it may have regarding the evaluation of the traffic impact of such interchanges.
BYFBOS. WP
95.134
Pl~()JI~(~rr I-IOrfI.JNE NtJlVlHEll
1-800-205-2929
C()NSlJLTANT STUDY TEAl\1
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF QUADE and DOUGLAS
PHOTOGRA!\:II\JIETRIC DATA SERVICES, INC.
ROUSE-StRINE ASSOCIATES, LTD.
A. L & ASS()CIA TES, INC
¡\IARY l\IEANS & ASS()CIATES
LAND PLANNING AND DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC.
\VATER~VAY SURVEYS & ENGINEERING, LTD.
I
""'
Route 29 Bypass Enters Design Phase
The Virginia Department of Transportation announced today
that the design phase of the Route 29 Bypass has commenced.
Instrumental in expediting the design phase of the study were
Commonwealth Transportation Board members Mr. H. Carter
Myers, III and Mr. William S. Roudabush.
The design phase of the project has been awarded to
Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. (PB). PB will
manage a multi-disciplinary team which iricludes the
Charlottesville firm of Land Planning & Design Associates, Inc.
(LPDA), headed by R. Stan Tatum, to assist them in
development of a highway that is parklike in setting. VDOT has
directed PB to use unique and innovative design approaches to
develop a project that is sensitive to the environment while
creating an attractive Gateway to the Charlottesville/Albemarle
area.
Early on, VDOT recognized that an important component
of the Bypass design involved sensitive issues to the citizens of
the Charlottesville/Albemarle area. In selecting a consultant,
VDOT stipulated that an integral part of the design must include
landscape architecture.
Chuck Cayton, project manager for PB, commented, "We
have carefully chosen a team; that couples strong technical
expertise with excellent design skills. The region gemands
nothing less than a top-flight road that is as sensitively situated
in the landscape as is possible. Special consideration will 1Jè_
given to the watershed area which the road will pass through."
A key member of the team is Charlottesville landscape
architect Stan Tatum. "Stan's local perspective and his excellent
skills,· together with the team's collaborative approach, will
assure that thoughtful landscape design will be an integral part
of the planning of this important project from the onset," said
Cayton.
Stan Tatum added, "LPDA looks forward to the challenges
and opportunities of this project. In applying the principles of
landscape architecture to roadway design we will contribute to
a facility that is appropriate to its setting." .
The Bypass Design Citizen Advisory Committee, appointed
by the Charlottesville/Albemarle Metropoljtan Planning
Organization, will be sharing its perspective with the project
team. Mr. Bob Garland, Jr. Chairman of the Advisory
Committee stated, "We look forward to working with the
consultant to incorporate community based criteria into this
important phase of the Route 29 Bypass Project. Those criteria
address the concerns of this community regarding the protection
of environmental resources, integrity of neighborhoods, schools
. and businesses, as well as design factors that will enhance
community acceptance of the Route 29 Bypass. The completion
and approval of the design phase will finally eliminate the
uncertainty of the location and appearance of the Bypass."
"We' want to hear from the¡ people with concerns or ideas
and have set up a toll free number which they can cgll," said
Cayton. "The number is 1-800-205-2929. During normal
business hours Monday thru Friday you may call this number fòr
information or to give us your ideas and express your concerns.
After hours please leave a message and we will call you back."
The design of the project is anticipated to take three years.
Pending completion of the public involvement process and
Commonwealth Transportation Board approval, Right of Way
activities could commence as early as December 1996 pending
available funding.
VDOT and PB will hold public meetings at regular intervals
to provide progress updates and t'O solicit citizen comments. A
newsletter will also be published on a regular basis to keep the
people of the region informed about the project.
/
..,
Consultant Study Team
Prime: Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade And
Douglas, Inc.
Roadway Design, Traffic & Bridges
.
Subs: Photogrammetric Data Services, Inc.
Mapping
Rouse-Sirine Associates, Ltd.
Survey
A. I. & Associates, Inc.
Bridge Design
Land Planning And Design Associates,
Inc.
Landscape Planning
Mary Means And Associates, Inc.
Public Involvement
y../aterway Surveys & Engineering, Ltd.
Hydrographic Survey
~
VDOT Key Players
Mr. William S. Roudabush
Commonwealth Transportation Board
Culpeper District
Mr. H. Carter Myers,III
Commonwealth Transportation Board
At-Large Urban
Mr. Don R. Askew
District Administrator
Culpeper District
Ms. Angela G. Tucker
Resident Engineer
Charlottesville Residency
Mr. John A. DePasquale
Location and Design Division
Culpeper District
Mrs. Patsy Napier
Location and Design Division
Project Manager
/
""'
"
-'-~~~~~.~:.
~.-:;:-
t
,-ir~-¢:~-~
é:.,ø'
~~.-
"'~
.::;0
;).". .
.';,,,
~=,
0-::......
.--'~
/
-"::
,
~,,~
,.
~ ..'
_¿ß~'~--/~
,
~
~, /
'. //
;<
// \.
/,..-
r'
« !
/<~~).
8.r-
\::
?
,
~.~~
-(
-
... '-'
, ,
II,
','
~:
~.
};
~
,
~
~)
Project Location Map
ROUTE 29 BYPASS
6029-002-F22, PE-107
Albemarle County
SCALE 1: 24,000
'.... \./"" '\ // \\ >< ì
----~ " \, '. .... \ / \ ,
' "~, ~ ~ "/ ,~/ ./\ X y~,,, \
~..../\ <\>~' \\./' \\ // \ / >{\ /' \ /( // \
.. ' , ..' \ v '/ /', ~~
. /' >:' /' \ .// , /\ ~>'/ . , \.. /' . \ \ , '\
( \ '\ ./,/ \ / '\ / \ ./ \ \>(/ \ ./ ..,
1..." X / \.. /' X
'. , '.x / .. /' \ ./'
I ,~ý \.. ,/ \ /' .. \( ''y' '../.. ~
¡ /'<. ....'( " ~ ~\ .... \ , ,/, ~ ./
' "', /' '. I~, \ ',/ \ / \ ~ ~, "\ / '..
' .' . '\ ./ \', ) /', \ ,\ "'-v' ~ \.~ / '. / ,/. ..'
' " '. ~,/ .. "", . .. A~ ", ,. "\, .
I ../ , ./ \./ ..../, / / '\ .x. \ /' ' (\ / //
' . x. .. '/ ',/.', ~'.. ,. ~ '.
/ "." /". . ~ .<"" ~ / .. X" /, . , :r', '.
.". \ ", / ../, ~:.:/\ /' ./ ~~,~/ \. ", \ /, ,/ fl(''''' )~è. ,\~.') \ ~'/..
\ ..x/ ";>('·V ~ "'./ /', /< . -;, o~ X ./ / \ . '\ ....> '-'. \,/
~ ~ '. , / '---'" ~ \ ., '.\.. V . ( .. /..¡" \~ y( \ ~',
.... \ ".;.. /./'.'.,' '\ . \....., .,~. '-'.. , '\ \./',.. X\ . ) \.: /' '.
..~ , ~~, / " , " " .
'·x~ \'o /~ , ".. .. 'o~' I , ' ./ '. }X. .,
'\ X" x./ '../, , / '~'o'/ -,', ' .. 'I. '. ( \ ' V " \ .
'< ....' '- .. ., ,., ."" .. .. ./ '\' , .. \ / .. V '- ,,1 '.....: , . "\ .-" 0.....', ,
,,' /.. X .. ~, ~ '''', '.. ~
'\\./ . , . ,/ \ ... ".~/ \ ./. ',../ , '.. / .... ,., . ~" Vi· ' ., ./'. ¡ .' " / ., "". .~..x. , '1r;
. v' . f / . '. , ..'. '/ \ ,..~'" X -' "'0 ',.., ~. ,0'., '\. _~~_ ~/
.. " ' " ./ ) - , , . , .. ./ ',."" /, ~'Y. '/ \ ' ,.' /
/ ".V \' ~ \ ,- ....ø \ .. ¡. .' \~ <"/ 0 ',' /', ),//" /,.' . /0: '. ..
F: >' \. . . . \i ',' C)lØ19: ;-:: : :::'.:y, / 'Á-., 0+."",. \// / '¡, ~// {o.." ' . /x. '\'..
I ..... /" ..., R . .. /" .... " c .. '. , U/. ". . ~ . . /"
:' ~,·/'{~)!i Pf'9'"0 J \,. / ...."" i;"··, //-A. . 1 /~.<. \'\/ <::;. ~ .....; ... 1.1L--.>:-..'--.:.-/;/ 'x .--5>< ~/ .> ~ \ /,,~ "1. ./
'. -. / " '" /-" y . · /~ \" /)¡, . , v.'
/,/ " /. ::)' . -.' / "''' ~ ¡,¿!'/ / .. ~ ~.. ,., ." \,.// /' .\ /' :-v...., /'" /\. 'o~ (>'/
/ ,x,;'... ~., ,/ ,v' ,.p/ / / r" X',~, ~. ./_ "'.,,/ ',/, '. '.:/!
", . , r ,~/ ~ ',' '.. ... , .~, / .~ ......... ....~ -? ',,-, >/ '. /0
."/ 1;.;.--" '".'"ó . .' \\ '. d. . /, . // %~ "., 'õ", /, X
of '" I,. . /'['., ...::- " ....', ~ ""'/ . ~'I ", . ~ ó,', »," \ ./..~
. .~., , , . .., " ~, .. / - , ". '.
~' ,/.~ ? '~'J,., ,/~.' .: ~'l . '/'.' '..... .. -~" '>(. ~. 1" A'\ ~\ \
: 'f, ' \ ~ '/ \:: ~'ti/ / ~/\ . ',,-:-;> //\ " //" / / ~,~<~"
~ , ~ ¡ ß .. .'-., ". ~ '".. .. .f~)
\ . " '"" - ,~/>.. ~. ., '-~ ',-: t .. -< . \ .
'(, .,.,\\ .... ':=..."" '" 1'<, . <C"'v.K ,"',¿ .......... 7-...... ",' ~/ ~ \ ~\ ~êI, '
" ). . ',= . .\. ,'.:. ~. -¡>.,.... ,u.... , "~....:..---- .~. ,
II ", ,.\. -:\{--::-:c:,...~, ~ ¡. =---:f. ., '\, ' .' ~,~ "". _ "U flo/....... / .' . '.. /...:.;
!, ," \ "},'oC:f d~". r ,~. 'Ó"" x~ ",,'.. ::.<,' . /, / , " '. I
' '\ ~ ~ "" '-;. . " . '-"\ , '.' \ ,f_",.. .. ø...... . ~ ~.<j "'. ',1
,. '" 1, ". '",', , ,..¿, .. ~''';' ;¡ " '-c , i ',.'" ,,: '" j' .:"" :".,,:.;;~ . ~. ',~ ,
.<.,. .- \, I' ,\~- '.. e,.. \. I ,.,.p, ~~:z '. " .'
,,'" ";" ¡ .' . . .>; ". ,', "-: ';...;.¡.,;, '-, .". ;". <¡¡~\\ ¡\i~i .'1: ", ,:..-~
'- 'q ~ J~, ' '-.. ", ~~', ';;¡'¡'>'.'f- ".. " ."'" ,,, ,
~ " "-~-r." .J"j' ~ \j '. ,,#, " .i¡ .. ~'.'\ '-co; . . ¡:;1'''!~ '. ~ ~.'::\ ,~,".~ . ':) i
. w... . .. - ,.......... \ ""'..r .~ ,.' .." " ¡,... ... ~ , "". . c'
~~~d. '?,..:t::t/;:'~;',:~~,#-<, /:~,' '~¡{>,'" '·$~1j;.~:f;!: :;:;;;":,;;.;;~ f7, 'ª j
. V.._. ". < .......->.., . . '.. J":-/_ \ l'ILrt, i.r. ,~ ~ I, nl¿"" '/ .,. ,.~, / ., "" /" <, ',y' ,....
' " J.., . " . ""., ~. I!,,~.. . ,~. f" .... ~,'. ~ . '," .. ~ ..
' ." """i--"- , .~ -, '~~,. /, .. 'd'-" ...,..~.." . '-'~r -0"" ,. :
.. . ". . ~~. ¡. .''', ,¡' -r.1" .. .' o;é, f '\, ,! ~ 1:.7' ,;:" .,:]",' '....:"'.. .". .., t:'-,.; '<,' (J cc" /i':.,.. ,/ 1
' . \ \.. " .- .., '. " , '" '" -., · . -;/'... . ,". , . " , , ~, '0 ~~~ -'-'F ~ I
.' . " ',..... ,~ -... "-c, ,~ '. , . "~'- ~ ~,,' ....,.~ ~:J >, " " .. :.. .J-, : II ~ "00' ~ ¡. :..... : ,
'cO .... , 1/:... '\' " '~t", ~_', '.".,,,,,\ K.... ','.' ~'~'7." .." -' ,__ . __~, ...} ~ ¡\ / '~¡, ¡
/ 1jJ-" /,"". 7H"'~ . ~ '~':~" .~, '___.' " .., 1.:- '.'i(~' ..(
£~~ ' , -~ " -~~- . .. -'<~",- -~, .... -" , ...x=., ". -'.. J . -,-" .. ''-'~'''', , ~ . 'h,. '~" J .'
{' ,,~.. 'o·.~·1 ~,~ ;~, " , .. ~ . "u "'~: },", . ~," . ~ ..' ""~".-.- _" :,~~ I..."'.r IJ ,.--l íl ~' ..t.. ,,~,:...,._.,'p/
' o~ ~1t\ < C'C. '. --"':', , r"" . \ ¡, .,.. . r . ;, ! ~ ".. . \ ~'. c, ", ~"""'. "","", ",,' ."" '" ".
~ " " . ,,' .. ~', ' -~ " "" , i". .. _ " '..' .~ , ". ,.' ~_ '. .~ ~. co'~ " . .
"1./' ¡. """j" '",_. 'v~, ',.. 'U", c:.. ,4.. " " ;; . ~~-'" '''.' -",,, . ='.' t. ]¡x", "f,
, " ~: ~~-,~§.."",:¿"5...-~::';'9¿-j; :,~ C . ..FI' G ", ~. ¿", ,1;;-1 1<' " ,~~-,,\ ;~'~~ t,¿. ":.\þ:':j~flf.r~,y .'
· crl' ,,~"~\ . ~ ~. =----. -' - '.~ ,'~. /.. .." . --~ ¡ --~ -..f r , ,~ _ '~'";-o-r-;,.~. Ii 4. "ì1 ""'"1\,""
~'.""~,, ~ '<:" :C·-' - -., ;,' '~-'""-~7, '. r ',~ r " . '''·i' ;!;¡,'. '~~" ~ ~ ." J\ .1 . " C
' ., J", -", . '.. ~~., ~~,,~~.,,~ ~~ r '" \,~," , .'~, '.. f ._,. ", ',,,' "'\: ,Þ, ". ..., o.
' --:::'~~~ " ~ ')" to¡ , " . ,. },.-, , ' '"'' ~""I"I"'~, -, '.. , _~., ",'- .Â,,¡¡I,..;. ~
~ . ", ',.". ~ /c, .." c " "~-. '.' " ~ ~" .. " ".. ,
' ~. ",. ~- . f, i ;,~, '. à _ , .. '\"~-,-~.,,, , .'~ n~__- , , ,~ ,. ".. t'"."..""",
:r,;};',iy '~f~ :ó< ;::::? .:f:·¿Y~~::,~~~"" :Ar ;~:;ë''''' r-:,:~# - .":~::" \~-:'Þ,,-, ,l!tfff;.F .,... ..
'" . ~" ~-,..¡ \ ,~'" ~~~ , .. , , , , v". \ ..,~. '. c" ,,' 11<..
¡" ,. "',~ '.". "\ .~ '~, , '. ~. ". , .
"i:'''~£~~~r ,\~ ':,'\ r(.~~,. .', , ,\~'.;""\¡;'J~,- .~,:.: ~··t·:~"
~:ø .~ ;r(\¡:~ r -. '. '~::. .... ~~'"=~. (*,~_ _ .._ .~';c''''''.
Cf-r ".~< ,..d. 1.'r~~~ "'1 f;' \ ~ .~, . .'" ,.~ "r=--..,. 'c'"
. .. ", "'-__\è~, ,'.. .. . .'.' i '~.;"..~~, '~-_..- if
~Ø/\··-.:/."J ~ i I' ·ó~ -~~~""'"'r""~'" ", " , " ~ ___~ , /"" ~..
..;, '<\,"1 'i'.\ '. j, ß I:~ ".~, '\;, .,.':--. '" , .. ~
...... ','" '\,;~¡ " / "-L\~ ",''', . q _"'.. ' ' "
v . >~,;::.~~i{¡7¿ b;~,----=~~;~~ .:....,_
V ~'.d)~ \ ~";;n-. .", :.~ _.\. '"¡;-; , :
:, , \ ,Y,,·\ \ '., __, ~~,r=----. . , .'-'..Cc -:-.
""" " '- ',;<;í 6f ~ ,. ==~---''''_._-~-~.!>__'' ..:?'., '/.-A
'~'/t~<~~~~, ~~:-J-/_~_~__. :.'_ ...:';";,~é~/ ~."
=~- c -...., :~. '-OR , __. 4 ___~_ _ _ __ _,
",', F=':' - ,,:-;.;,,'~'''\, ~. _. ' . _ _. ,
"'~ r 1 !~\,_ . \ (.."",,~ /A_.__
' \.- .-~ J V ,
;.,-.
..-
-~/
~
5000 Ft.
1km
o
o
DII
~~
:=; -
=---ø
'ii--··--
~.r:
~
..-~
,
-
~
'~._-
..-
....
,
~..
~-+
..
.,
,-'
;,
,
<:
~~
-~
'-'
.,
-
G. SELECTED ALTERNATIVE
On November 15, 1990, the Commonwealth Transportation Board selected an alternative
consisting of a combination of improvements to be implemented over a number of years in
three phases to seIVe both immediate and long-term transportation needs.
For ldng-range needs, Alternative 10, the near western bypàSS ~lternative, modified to
eliminate the interchanges at Barracks Road and Miller Road, and refined to avoid the Ivy
Creek AgriculturaVForestal District, will be constructed at the time that traffic conditions
along Route 29 become unacceptable and economic conditions permit. Initially, corridor
preseIVation efforts will be undertaken so that future development will not preclude
implementation of this alternative. The interchanges of Alternative 10 with Barracks Road
(Route 654) and Route 743 are not included in the selected alternative. They will only be
added at the request of Albemarle County.
·
Medium-range needs will be addressed by implementation of grade-separated interchanges
on existing U.S. Route 29 at Hydraulic Road, Greenbrier Drive, and Rio Road. Initially,
right-of-way preseIVation for the interchanges will be undertaken to preclude further
development in the areas necessary for construction of the interchanges.
·
For immediate needs, the base case improvements will be implemented, providing six lanes
plus continuous right turn lanes.
·
The engineering, traffic, and environmental data developed for this study show that the
selected alternative is best for the following reasons:
·
·
o
Table IV-2 in Chapter IV shows that Alternative 10 is projected to divert
approximately 10,600 to 14,000 vehicles per day (16.4% to 26.9% of traffic)
from existing U.S. 29. This is 40% to 169% more than the next closest
alternative (Alternative 11 is projected to divert approximately 5,200 to 7,800
vehicles or 10% to 12.8%).
·
-
o - Table IV-3 in Chapter IV shows that Alternative 10 would provide levels of
traffic seIVice and operating speeds clearly superior to those provided by ,the
Expressway Alternative (Alternative 9).
o Of all the bypass alternatives, Alternative 10 would provide the shortest and
most direct route for through traffic on Route 29.
o Alternative 10 does not cross the S6uth Fork Rivanna River ReseIVoir as do
the other two western bypass alternatives. Watershed impacts can be
minimized by use of design features.
11-10
\
.
~
PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS
6.3
Comment: Questions assumption that Route 29 can or should become a major north-south interstate by putting in
bypasses around a few towns like Charlottesville.
Response: For most of its length through Virginia, Route 29 is a four-lane divided highway, with controlled access
features on some sections. It Is the only major north-south highway selVlng the expanding development north of
Charlottesville and surrounding portions of Albemarle County. It also is the only route connecting points north of
Charlottesville with points south of Charlottesville.
y
6.4 Comment: Consultant made no In-depth study of ways to facilitate local traffic flows on Route 29.
Resøonse: The Route 29 Corridor Study Included a detailed traffic and transportation analysis which studied In depth
both existing travel conditions within the study area and the effect of various alternatives upon the future traffic in the
corridor. This Is reported in the Technical Memorandum Traffic and Transøortation Analysis, March, 1990.
6.5 Comment: Plat of Squirrel Ridge subdivision is Inaccurate in that one lot on Pine Cove Circle Is omitted.
Response: Aeld Investigations updated the aerial photography and other materials used for determining Impacts.
6.6 Comment: Need traffic reduction strategy Qe. dis-lncentives for slngle-<>ccupancy car driving).
Resøonse: 1.36.
6,7 Comment: Use system of local streets which run behind the businesses along Route 29 to provide access to them.
Put stop light and cross over street at the post office entrance.
Response: 1.10.
6.8 Comment: Adopt plans for public transportation to be developed.
Response: One of the alternatives studied was the Mass Transit alternative. It was determined that this alternative
consisting of transit-selVed park-and-ride lots could be considered as an alternative travel option for commuters or
shoppers, but It will not be a viable solution to traffic needs on Route 29. -
6.9
Comment: If Alternative 10 is chosen, could the diamond Interchange at Route 743 be eliminated, thus allowing traffic
to travel Rio Road and Route 743 as it now does?
Response: Alternative 10 Is a part of the selected alternative, however, interchanges with both Route 743 and Barracks
Road have been eliminated from the project.
6.10
Comment: Suggests a 264 Interstate Bypass loop around the City of Charlottesville.
Response: 1.7.
6.11
Comment: Wny is a bypass necessary?
Response: A bypass has been determined to be necessary to solve the existing and future congestion on Route 29
North between the U.S. 250 Bypass and the South Fork of the Rivanna River, and to serve through traffic on Route 29.
6.12
Comment: Favors construction of Georgetown Road Extension through Canterbury Hills to US25O/US29.
~sPOnse: 1.10.
6.13
Comment: Supports improved mass transportation and a provision for safe bicycle routes.
Response: 6.8.
6.14
Comment: Supports four-lane controlled access on Route 631 from 29N east to connect further east and south with
the tail end of Alternative 7A. Wants n'ew interchange on 29/250 Bypass to connect Arlington Blvd.
Response: 1.10.
6.15
Comment: Change the traffic signalization at Rio Road's Intersection with Route 29.
Response: 2.4.
!
6.16
Comment: Have a lane designated for trucks only.
Response: 2.4.
6.17
Comment: CATS plan that is now referred to is not the original plan.
RespOnse: The regional transportation plan referred to in this study is the current approved Charlottesville Ivea
Transportation Study (CATS) Plan.
--
&ðif'¿
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ;'-/-?i'5 ¿i'C5 ~
Prou.'ctzng The Erlllromnenr Is Everybody's Business
Statement delivered to the Board of Supervisors
Western Bypass Press Conference Update
September 7, 1995
According to the executive summary prepared for the Western Bypass Press Conference
Update, the consultants have been asked to evaluate the traffic impact of "hypothetical"
interchanges at Hydraulic and Barracks Roads. This evaluation could represent a step
towards real interchanges in the design of the bypass, which would undermine all the County
has done over the past 15 years to protect the watershed.
Building these interchanges would dramatically alter the expectations of nearby landowners
and raise the speculative value of surrounding property, making it extremely difficult for the
Board to deny requests for rezonings to intense commercial and residential uses. As the
watershed begins to develop, the sediment, phosphorous and nitrogen loading which
polluted the reservoir in the late 1970's would once again increase to critical levels. In
addition, the very construction of these interchanges would introduce substantial new earth-
disturbing activity into the South Rivanna Watershed.
According to a 1990 resolution by the CTB, these interchanges will be built only if the Board
of Supervisors requests their construction. If the CTB intends to keep its word, it would seem
seem an unnecessary expenditure of scarce highway funds to measure the impact of
imaginary interchanges, when there are so many other real transportation projects short of
funds throughout the Commonwealth.
For these reasons, the Piedmont Environmental Council urges the Board to remain
consistent in its opposition to these interchanges and any interim steps which may lead to
their construction in the future.
.j'j Horner Srrl'l't, Bo:\ 4(10, \V;¡rtTIl!O[¡, Virgil1la 22186/Î03-347-23 H/Fax 349-900")
] 1 ì 1 Rose Hill Dmc, Suite ì, Charlonl'ovillc, Virginia 22903/804-97Î-2033/Fax 97Î-6306
Citizens for Albemarle, Inc.
Box 3751 University Station
Charlottesville, Virginia 22903
September 1, 1995
í,:;. ,,2C1-v""-
ecr'j f}GiZ.
.A f t^
ßo 5 r'
fin'I/-"/ ,ßÇJ
f__6/~J ~
.
The Honorable Walter F. Perkins
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Rt. 3, Box 79
Croze4 \'1\ 22932
Dear Chairman Perkins:
Citizens for Albemarle, an environmental organization with over 400 members residing in the
City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County, is extremely concerned about the addition of the
design of interchanges to the western bypass project, approved with no access other than the
termini. No accesses were planned in deference to the county's dedication to watershed
protection. Any decision to add interchanges is entirely up to the Albemarle County Board of
Supervisors, according to the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) resolution of
November 1990.
Citizens for Albemarle has consistently opposed any bypass through the watershed of the
South Fork Rivanna Reservoir (SFRR). In the early 1970's, the SFRR suffered from severe
eutrophication problems due to runoff of excess nitrates and phosphates from farms and
developing land. Albemarle County, after a comprehensive study, wisely and boldly
instituted many land use controls through zoning ordinances and regulations, encouraged best
management practices on farms and even took the drastic step of downzoning the entire SFRR
watershed to protect our valuable and iITeplaceable water supply. Citizens for Albemarle
took an active and positive stand on all of these protective measures. Many lawsuits ensued,
but the County was upheld in all of these, because it was canying out its obligation to protect
the health, safety and welfare of its residents.
As a result of these efforts, the eutrophication problem has stabilized for the present, but the
problem of siltation is constantly with us. The recent report "Urban Raw Water Management
Plan" by Black and Veatch states that siltation in the SFRR now amounts to approximately
22% of the total volume capacity. Continuing siltation is expected to further reduce the safe
. eld eservoir until the ear 2015 erha s extended a few ears with the Chris Green
L e addition en the safe . eld of all available sources of drinkin water for Charlottesville
d its urban area . I 'ust e ual the demand. Upon reaching this crossover poin4 our
opulation growth and velopment must come to a halt unless, of course, the Buck Mountain
Reservoir is on line by that . e, and this supplementary supply could cany us until beyond the
year 2040.
However, the over.ridin oncerns that we have about the western bypass, which runs
through 4.2 miles of e SFRR watershed, are the siltation to be experienced during
construction, the essures of development which always follow new roads and the fear of
toxic spills. A access interchan es within the watershed can onl worsen our concerns.
· Siltation: No matter how good any precautions and protective measures are to prevent soil
erosion during construction, they never seem to work properly and our weather pattern
seems to consistently give us severall0-year rains and gullywashers every year. We
believe that siltation is currently and will continue to be a major problem for our reservoir.
If the western bypass is built in the near future as some people are pushing for, rather than
near the year 2010 as originally planned in 1990 when the three phase construction
sequence was adopted by the CTB, then the probability of a much greater siltation rate is a
real threat that may significantly reduce the anticipated life of the SFRR. The addition of
two access interchanges within the watershed will oIÙY further accelerate the problem and
we trulv may not have sufficient water for our population for a period of time until the
Buck Mountain Reservoir comes on line.
· Effects of development: The long range effect of a western bypass or of any new road is
the new development which always takes place at the intersections and! or near the road and
within the watershed due to the attractiveness of easier access. It's like flies attracted to
honey. Legislative actions such as zoning and land use regulations don't work, since
politicians are constantly changing and they usually give in to re-zonings and special use
pennits when development pressures mount. Development within a watershed will always
lead to greater siltation and increased run-off of all types of chemicals and contaminants
into the water reservoir. This is environmentally and fiscally irresponsible.
· Toxic spills at bypass access interchanges: Both of the proposed interchanges lie within the
watershed. futerchanges, with merging at the on-off ramps, are notorious for traffic
accidents. The Barracks Road intersection would be within a hundred feet or so of a
tributary of the SFRR. The Hydraulic Road intersection would be adjacent to extremely
steep slopes to the SFRR and very close to the intake of the water treatment plant. A truck
accident of hazardous or toxic materials at this spot could have a disastrous effect on the
population, since so little time would be required for a toxic substance to reach the
treatment plant.
Since the CTB has mandated that we have this bypass through our watershed, the best
protection that you, the Board of Supervisors, can now provide for our endangered reservoir is
to keep new access interchanges and development out of the watershed and to continue and
even strengthen the stringent regulations!!!
Citizens for Albemarle is unalterablv opposed to the addition of access interchanees on the
western bypass because of the ereatlv increased threat to our endaneered water supplv.
the SFRR. Potable drinkine water is the most valuable asset of any community. We Ufee
you to oppose this sueeestion as stronelv and as vieorouslv as yOU opposed the bypass.
Sincerely,
1(~~
Karen Dame, Vice-President
v
¡JeT II/C)^,
-
-----------~----~- ---~-----------~~ -~-·b---------~-~~------ .-. .-----~ -. --~-
~=_~~_= - ~=_ ~'~t£n¡"~~e-I~u-<¿r~~~"~: =OF_~~~~ Vl;~~~~J:.. ~-/-~S.
IZE" P¿Alt/l/JêO (}¡I'Ufl ft;ç.s" /IV CT,s l?.l!...q]'G__..it" <¡ ~ It.rn Ho. y~~£ ~._
WE ( me t/-'!!!JG~..sLqAL~D .t!.éJ/ileA.l'rs-_~7?-Ie W!flr¡;:4.lDO,j)
VIt.L./16(; ~li!çA ~~S(7eC;7t:=<J~Rg(¡)ªé,rï 'T1fJ9T Vov R.eeoA./J/DEI<
7H6 ¡OÆo~D.s-e£J. C¡'¡A4J&~S' 7ð THe ~e~e-J\.lT /Jus J'€O¿;T{;". we
O€peN.(} ON 'THë ð/lf' J"y.sTE"/I1 7ð 7íf!.19-1./fJ"t- m G,JOIèk. .:sr:¡.¡oo¿
.--~------~ -----.------.--.-.--.--.. .~. ~-..-.--..~--._....~-- ~.'--- _nm___._~ r-.. --·--~-----·I-
77ié. e-I!. OCëRy J70g T~ë l./$ù,q(.. O¡i/y 7'0 ,()RY ¢~R ß~OJ" /t-III() .IT __
,
/h'l!!IRLL- O~OïH_ç!!:._~tpI'lTIOIV,$. lL_(§ l JoI........~w(i·t§" ;tfJ!,! e-F¡:::/~ /Tvï
1Ylë rHO Q 0;:; ï~ ,q1lJ_~8ðR.LI1TI <?..N I'tNfJ _¿r:-.!~. N€Ve~ ëtl'lsý ¡...Ær ~ к
mtr tJé sr I.J& (!!!J~ CIl4116'N~t{6 ,eOUTl;- ¿íILl.. 1"Y1-9~e. 19- IJ'Ft=/(J,(JL.l
Ú JTV4-r""AJ" '-/ot¿se,. I'tl)hlI7TÆ8'-Y, 77-I1.s P,e6(Jl.E~H()Ùt...L) ¡J¡t ve t1ér::;/V
I9CDA.E.sSeQ .$OOIl.lSI2 " HåCAieve.1fl. ~6 ]?)l..fllF h1éêr/lvG' /'tr WHJ(!.ti___________~.
T7-11.5 C!1I'9l1Jóé w"¥.s P¡.e..,sT f)I.rç(J~§e.()~".$
..se.e~/c.e ê.AJD,S 1'f7' ¿ùO ,,0. ""1,
t1í 7:00 1'.('Y ·1-'~(J5 _____
---------_._-~
WE o!Z&é YoU lY~E'\!pN..slo_,:;__,e. ___
------~
$: {2~ .. Z7ð w/';fu-d !If
L _Â:~Rl~(Y'\ ~?S:4h~J.cL.~d_,-_ _ _ ____
J Cl~1~ I~Lr..vh,kk-"",J..1..LM__ --
Aei-t -------_.___________L'il l.0h/~ ~e.. ~~é:Ld_~~-~---- __
¿lr~_~~_____________~Z LtdM-~o~¥¡-
.~~-L-WllLIGjJJff7)d-4-d----_.--n-..-
UH~~~L~Kt2'f_Ñ ~___ __g,_g.,LuJ HLrf;.IJ.!ºop.____~--.I[---------
~_~________ B.oLJ.c.)~~"l1C)~~s.-------~-_ ______
~~.S~..-.--.M--.~~{ _=!J\1~:.r~ 1M !'º~1~7--
Yp~--~~ _ ---------- --n-Wfid;~n ------.-
-- -------
, '-
~~==~=~~~=~=~~f~
J ~(U fif b2..eR/)__ . --¡~¿;6. íUb_t¿LAftXJd
~ L_1l::-IO_íJb~~--.
~ (V-~Ld ~22_n_
J-43ð4 "'4.fJ. ,sIJ11' -tØ/ -~_~h?~t::::--w-o::Þd
-.-------.
.------.-.------.-------
--.------
-~._-
--. ._---_.~---
---....
-_._-.----_.__._._----_.__._-~~-,-_._------------
--~-----~---------- ---------~-- ----
~--- ----- - -- ------- - -- - --- ----
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Abandonment of Route 606
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
ACTION: X
Dist( bJ!J~ ~~BE~/_.)?~
Agendt It.n¡ No. ~~¿/6. .6(';'
INFORMATION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Request to Abandon Because of the Relocation of Route 606
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
~
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Cilimberg
REVIEWED BY:
I
BACKGROUND:
Relocation of Route 606 at Austin Drive was a requirement of the rezoning for the Briarwood development. The developer has requested that
the old section of Route 606 be abandoned in this location (Attachment A).
DISCUSSION:
The County Attorney has previously advised that an existing state road may be abandoned as enabled under Section 33.1-155 of the Virginia
State Code. (Attachment B) In swnmary, the Code allows abandonment of an old road section when a new road section has been constructed
in lieu thereof Approval of the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner and resolution of the Board of Supervisors is required.
The relocated Route 606 is now being used by traffic. However, according to the County Engineering Department and VDOT, it has not been
accepted into the state system Abandonment of the old Route 606 should not occur until the relocated section is accepted into the state system.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors indicate a willingness to abandon the requested section of Route 606 and authorize a resolution
allowing the requested abandonment be brought back for its approval subject to the following:
1. Acceptance of the relocated section of Route 606 into the state system.
2. Approval of the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner.
ROUTE606.EXE
95.143
ATTACHMENT A
; ; r:
I
August 17, 1995
181æ>
~ ._-- ~-------""'-~---...
'.-- ..... -.--.
. -- ~
Ms. Ella Carey
Clerk, Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Dear Ms. Carey:
Attached please find a copy of a plat recorded in
Deed Book 775 page 589 showing the relocation of State
Route 606 at Austin Drive in Briarwood Subdivision. To
complete the dedication of Austin Drive and Route 606, we
hereby request that the original right of way be abandoned
and the new alignment be accepted into the Virginia
Department of Transportation public road system.
Si.ncerelY, ~-
~~'/-7ij
Wendell W. Wood
General Partner
cc: Mark Henry
Enclosure
WWW:mss
P.O. Box 5548 . Charlottesville, Virginia 22905 . (804) 979·3334. Fax (804) 979·6268
,. II ~ ~
i
. ~
",\
,
\
\
).
... ~
~ ~
'" '"
~ ~ '" i.
~,,~ .."
'" " "'.. ..
'\\. ~ \\\": ~
~'>:......" ..
"-~,,~ .
~ iì: \.\ "''' 'I!
II¡ '" ~'" ~
\0; ""- "'I ~
"- I-::. ~
~
~
\\
.
\~
\
--..:)
is)
~
~
~
~I\'
~ II
" ,
~ ~
~ ..
'<¡ ,\
~ "
'Ii'"
~
'tj
"
,_.
-:>""
'"
"ã~
-~~"'"
<.> ~
~~
~~
-~
-</7:;>~';"-07-?.4
0>'0
7,.,./7......./7-"'"
I:
~ ) ) 'I¡
~.,.~"...)' '
~"~~A"· ..~..,'
~~H'~q~~:¡¡~
~', ~, ~, ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
" \: , '~ . .
~.
,~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ .:.
~~~
~ ,'I ~
~
~
~
~
'i
¡
~
"
I .
§ 33.1-155
ATTACHMENT B
CODE OF VIRGINIA
§ 33.1-155
When real estate heretofore or hereafter acquired by the Commonwealth
incidental to the construction, reconstruction, alteration, maintenance and
repair of the secondary system of state highways which does not constitute a
section of the public road is deemed by the Commissioner no longer necessary
for the uses of the secondary system of state highways, the Commissioner
shall so certify, in writing, to the Board such facts, and it may authorize the
Commissioner to execute, in the name of the Commonwealth, a deed or deeds
conveying such real estate, interest therein or any portion thereof, either for a
consideration or in exchange for other lands that may be necessary for the
uses of the secondary system of state highways.
Any such conveyance shall have the approval of the Board by resolution
recorded in the minutes of a meeting of the Board. (Code 1950, § 33-76.11;
1950, p. 733; 1956, c. 106; 1970, c. 322; 1981, c. 323.)
Applied in Board of Supvrs. v. Horne, 215
Va. 238, 208 S.E.2d 56 (1974).
§ 33.1-155. Alternative procedure for abandonment of old road or
crossing to extent of alteration. - When any road in the secondary system
or any road in the secondary system containing a railway-highway grade
crossing has been or is altered and a new road which serves the same citizens
as the old road is constructed in lieu thereof and approved by the Common-
wealth Transportation Commissioner, the old road and/or the public crossing
may be abandoned to the extent of such alteration, but no further, by a
resolution of the board of supervisors or other governing body of the county,
declaring the old road and/or the public crossing abandoned. (Code 1950,
§ 33-76.12; 1950, p. 734; 1952, c. 127; 1970, c. 322.)
Procedure under this section and under
§ 33.1-151 distinguished. - The General
Assembly intended by this section and
§ 33.1-151 to specify two procedures available
to the governing bodies in abandoning roads in
the secondary highway system. The underlying
purpose of the two sections appears to rest in
the construction of a new road under the
alternative procedure provided in this section,
whereas the more complicated procedure pro-
vided by § 33.1-151 makes no provision for the
construction of a new road in lieu of the
abandoned road. Hudson v. AMOCO, 152 F.
Supp. 757 Œ.D. Va. 1957), aird, 253 F.2d 27
(4th Cir. 1958).
When abandonment proceedings are under-
taken under this section, the construction. of a
new road in lieu of the old which serves the
same citizens as the old road is contemplated.
The more complex procedure provided for in
§ 33.1-151 is not predicated upon, nor does it
require, construction of a new road in lieu of
the abandoned road. When a new road is
constructed, the county board is not required to
adopt the procedure provided for in § 33.1-151
but may act under this section. AMOCO v.
Leaman, 199 Va. 637, 101 S.E.2d 540 (958),
commented on in 44 Va. L. Rev. 628 (1958).
Discontinuance and abandonment are
not the same thing. Ord v. Fugate, 207 Va.
752, 152 S.E.2d 54 (967).
The phrase "a new road which serves
the same citizens as the old road" is to be
liberally construed and a wide discretion
must be accorded the board in its determina-
tion to abandon or alter a road, otherwise the
purpose of this section, enacted for the benefit
of the public, would be impaired or defeated.
AMOCO v. Leaman, 199 Va. 637, 101 S.E.2d
540 (958), commented on in 44 Va. L. Rev.
628 (1958).
The wording of this section providing for a
new road "which serves the same citizens as
the old road" must be liberally construed to
permit discretionary action by the board. Hud.
son v. AMOCO, 152 F. Supp. 757 Œ.D. Va.
1957), aird, 253 F.2d 27 (4th Cir. 1958).
Essential findings. - This section makes
no provision for a finding that some "public
utility" or "public interest" must be served by
any abandonment or vacation. The essential
findings are: (1) that the road be altered; (2)
that a new road be constructed in lieu thereof;
(3) that the new road serve the same citizens as
the old road; and (4) that approval of the State
Highway Commissioner (now Commonwealth
Transportation Commissioner) be obtained.
Hudson v. AMOCO, 152 F. Supp. 757 Œ.D. Va.
1957), aird, 253 F.2d 27 (4th Cir. 1958).
Review of action of county board. _ The
General Assembly made no provision for an
appeal to a court from the county board's
78
§ ~3.1-156
r
HIGHWAYS, BRIDGES AND FERRIES
§ 33.1-157
findings and action under this section. In the
absence of such a provision the Supreme Court
of Appeals may not review the board's action in
the absence of fraud or manifest abuse of
discretion. AMOCO v. Leaman, 199 Va. 637,
101 S.E.2d 540 (1958), commented on in 44 Va.
L. Rev. 628 (1958).
As the General Assembly made no provision
for an appeal to any court, from the resolution
of the coun ty board of supervisors making such
a finding that a new road will "serve the same
citizens as the old road," it must be assumed
that courts were not intended to review such
findings in the absence of fraud or manifest
abuse of discretion. Hudson v. AMOCO, 152 F.
Supp. 757 Œ.D. Va. 1957), afrd, 253 F.2d 27
(4th Cir. 1958).
Weight of board's finding that new road
will serve same citizens as old. - When the
road to be altered or abandoned is not a way of
necessity and does not abut the property of an
objector but is reached by traveling over or
across another public road that abuts the
objector's property, a finding by the board that
the new road serves the same citizens as the
old TOad may not be successfully challenged in
the absence of fraud or flagrant hardship
evidencing abuse of discretion by the board.
AMOCO v. Leaman, 199 Va. 637, 101 S.E.2d
540 (958), commented on in 44 Va. L. Rev.
628 (1958).
Ultimate exclusive use of abandoned
highway may be for private interest. - A
highway may be lawfully abandoned when
another and more adequate highway serving
the same citizens as the old road is constructed,
although the ultimate exclusive use of the
abandoned highway may be for a private
interest. Hudson v. AMOCO, 152 F. Supp. 757
Œ.D. Va. 1957), afrd, 253 F.2d 27 (4th Cir.
1958).
Complainants were not in the class of
citizens who were being "served" by an
abandoned secondary road where they had
access to it only by way of a private road
easement, not a way of necessity, and also had
access to another secondary road. Hudson v.
AMOCO, 152 F. Supp. 757 Œ.D. Va. 1957),
afrd, 253 F.2d 27 (4th Cir. 1958).
A secondary route was legally aban-
doned and a primary route altered, im-
proved and relocated as permitted by and in
accordance with the provisions of this section.
AMOCO v. Leaman, 199 Va. 637, 101 S.E.2d
540 (1958), commented on in 44 Va. L. Rev.
628 (1958).
Applied in Board of Supvrs. v. Horne, 215
Va. 238, 208 S.E.2d 56 (1974).
ARTICLE 12.
Abandonment of Roads Not in State Highway System 'or Secondary
System.
§ 33.1-156. Arplication of article; "road" defined. - The provisions of
this article shal apply mutatis mutandis to county roads maintained by a
county and not part of the secondary system, and to roads dedicated to the
public but which are not parts of the State Highway System, or the secondary
highway system. The term "road" shall include streets and alleys in case of
dedication to the public and shall likewise include an existing crossing by the
lines of a railway company of such road and a crossing by such road of the
lines of a railway company. (Code 1950, § 33-76.13; 1950, p. 734; 1970, c. 322.)
Cross 'references. - For provision that
nothing in Article 12 shall affect Chapter 10 of
Title 15.1, see § 33.1-167.
Law Review. - For survey of Virginia law
on property for the year 1972-1973, see 59 Va.
L. Rev. 1570 (1973).
§ 33.1-157. Abandonment of certain roads and railway crossings by
governing body of county. - When a section of a road not in the secondary
system is deemed by the governing body of the county, hereinafter in this
article referred to as governing body, no longer necessary for public use, or an
existing crossing by such road of the lines of a railway company, or a crossing
by the lines of a railway company of such road, is deemed by such governing
body no longer necessary for public use, the governing body by proceeding as
hereinafter prescribed may abandon the section of the road no longer deemed
necessary for public use, or such crossing by the road of the lines of a railway
company, or crossing by the lines of the railway company of the road, as the
case may be.
\
I
I
I
I
I
L
79
--
· ,
.'-<,¡......,.¡-
\VI
t, 1
¡ I
~ ~
U
,,...-...~\
.....'
David P. Bowennan
Ch-arlollesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 I FAX (804) 972-4060
August 18, 1995
Charles S Martin
Rrvannð
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Joueft
Walter F. Perkins
Whlff'Hdll
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scotlsville
Sally H. Thomas
Sdmuf'1 Mtller
MEMO TO:
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director, Planning/Community Development
Larry Davis, County Attorney ~. J
L. E. Neher, CMC, Chief Deputy Clerk JY
Abandonment, Old State Route 606 at Austin Drive in Briarwood Subdivision
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Attached is a copy of a request received this date from Wendell W. Wood for United Land Corporation
requesting that Old Route 606 at Austin Drive in Briarwood Subdivision be abandoned because of the
relocation of Route 606. Please prepare the appropriate staff report so that this request may be
discussed by the Board at its meeting on September 6, 1995. The filing fee for this abandonment has
been paid to the CI~rk.
LEN/mms
Attachment
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
*
Printed on recycled paper
~ .. - ..
August 17, 1995
p !995
,0, .
Ms. Ella Carey
Clerk, Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Dear Ms. Carey:
Attached please find a copy of a plat recorded in
Deed Book 775 page 589 showing the relocation of State
Route 606 at Austin Drive in Briarwood Subdivision. To
complete the dedication of Austin Orive and Route 606, we
hereby request that the original right of way be abandoned
and the new alignment be accepted into the Virginia
Department of Transportation public road system.
...----"
Sincerely, ~
I
·'<Z~7> >7/-ß/7;/;;:7
Wende I l W. Wood
General Partner
cc: Mark Henry
Enclosure
WWW:mss
P.O. Box 5548 . Charlottesville, Virginia 22905 . (804) 979·3334. Fax (804) 979·6268
,
COUNTY
OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
msk~tid WJ aoa.d:
__ Item N9,
AGENDA TITLE: Review County Engineer's AGENDA DATE: 9/6/95
Decision Regarding Coleman-Adams Soil Erosion
Permit
ITEM NUMBER: 8
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S) :
Messrs. Tucker/Trank, Ms. Higgins
ATTACHMENTS: (1) Memo to Jo Higgins Dated
12/30/93; (2) Letter to Mark Trank dated
7/7/95; Letter to J e Waller dated 1 27/95
REVIEWED BY:
(
BACKGROUND: In 1990, Coleman-Adams was awarded the construction contract for the Murray
Elementary School Capital Improvement Project. Pursuant to the County's Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Ordinance Coleman-Adams was required to obtain the permit and post a
soil erosion performance bond.
DISCUSSION: As set forth on the attached memorandum by staff dated December 30, 1995
(Attachment 1), the bond for $50,320.00 was posted by Coleman-Adams and accepted in
October, 1990. The bond amount was subsequently reduced to $16,660.00 based on a June
1992 inspection by County staff. Seeding and stabilization were not, however, performed
satisfactorily, and site work deficiencies were brought to the attention of Coleman-Adams
and its subcontractor on numerous occasions. The County was forced to have the work done
by another contractor for $13,500.00 Pursuant to the bond, notice of default was given to
the surety and Coleman-Adams as principal. The amount has not been paid. Section 7-7 of
the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance allows Coleman-Adams to appeal the
Director of Engineering's decision to call the bond before the Board of Supervisors. (See
Attachment 2) .
RECOMMENDATION: Deny the appeal. Coleman-Adams has failed to comply with the
requirements of the Plan and has defaulted under the terms of the bond. (See
Attachment 3) .
~g:~. WPD
,"" ~'~'..
,I
David P. Bowennan
Charlot tesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 2%-5800
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
July 13, 1995
Mr. James J. Sakolosky
Davidson & Sakolosky
916 Main Street
PO Box 798
Lynchburg, VA 24505
Dear Mr. Sakolosky:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated July 7, 1995,
requesting a review by the Board of Supervisors of the County Engineer's
decision that Coleman-Adams is obligated to reimburse County expenses in an
amount of $13,500 under the provisions of the Albemarle County Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Ordinance. This item has been scheduled to be heard by
the Board of Supervisors on September 6, 1995, at 10:00 a.m. The meeting will
be held in Meeting Room #241, Second Floor of the County Office Building. You
or your representative should be present at this meeting.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
EWC:mms
SðerelY,
l;~eNr~
CC : Mark A. Trank
Larry Davis
Jo Higgins
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
*
Printed on recycled paper
LAW OFFICES
DAVIDSON & SAKOLOSKY, P.C.
916 MAIN STREET
P. O. BOX 798
TELEFAX (804) 528-0105
FRANK G. DAVIDSON, III
JAMES J. SAKOLOSKY
CARY P. MOSELEY
LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA 24505
(804) 847-4444
FRANK G DAVIDSON, JR.
(1907-1991)
¿ rga:i
July 7, 1995
VIA FAX AND U.S. MAIL
Mark A. Trank, Esquire
Office of County Attorney
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
RE: Bond #4634756; Coleman-Adams Construction Co., Inc.
Soil Erosion Permit #1122
Dear Mr. Trank:
This is in response to your letter dated June 29, 1995.
Coleman-Adams would like to reach a compromise in this matter, but
believes that the County's final demand in an amount of $13,500.00
does not reasonably reflect the County's share of responsibility
for the remedial costs growing as large as they did. Coleman-Adams
believes if it had been promptly notified by the County that some
areas of grass had not matured satisfactorily, that much of the
later erosion could have been avoided.
After our recent conversation, Mr. A.C. Coleman, Jr.,
President of Coleman-Adams, spoke with Jo Higgins, Director of
Engineering, to explore possible ways to avoid litigation and break
the apparent impasse between the parties. Ms. Higgins, in essence,
informed him that the decision was final and the matter was out of
her hands.
As a result Coleman-Adams is hereby invoking its right under
§7-7 of the Albemarle County Erosion and Sedimentation Control
ordinance to apply for and receive a review of the actions of the
director of engineering in the interpretation of the regulations
regarding this matter. We are hopeful that review by the Board of
Supervisors will resolve this matter without litigation.
Although the provisions of §7-7 do not expressly preclude
bringing a civil action while a matter is being reviewed by the
Board, it seems apparent that the intent of that section is to
enable such review before litigation is initiated. We ask that you
not file suit until after review by the Board.
Mark A. Trank
July 7, 1995
Page 2
Please consider this letter to be Coleman-Adams' application
for review by the Board pursuant to §7-7. By copy of this letter I
am notifying the Board of Supervisors and the director of
engineering that Coleman-Adams is hereby applying for a review by
the Board of the director's decision that Coleman-Adams is
obligated to reimburse County expenses in an amount of $13,500.00
under the provisions of the Albemarle County Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Ordinance, §§7-1, et seg. If it is necessary
to complete an application form or to provide additional
information, please inform me.
Thank you for your cooperation.
JJS/spc
Very truly yours,
DAVIDSON & SAKOLOSKY, P.C.
cc: Mr. Walter F. Perkins, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Ms. Jo Higgins, Director of Engineering
ATTACHMENT 1
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Jo Higgins, Director of Engineering
R. A. Shaw, Erosion Control Officer ~
December 30, 1993
Murray School - Erosion Control Plan #1122
Listed below is a documentation record and photographs for
Murray School requested by Mr. George st. John to be sent to
the attorney for Coleman-Adams concerning the default of the
Erosion Control Performance Bond.
1) 07/21/92 Performance bond reduced to $16,660.00
(attached) .
2) 08/03/92 Letter sent to Joe Coleman stating that the
project was unsatisfactory and could not be
released (copy attached).
3) 07/28/93 A meeting was held on the site with Jo Higgins,
George Shifflett, Joe Coleman and R. A. Shaw to
go over in detail the corrections required on
the site. Mr. Coleman was asked by Jo Higgins
to submit a written' plan to the Engineering
Department by August 28 ,1993 for remedy of the
problems (no response was received).
4) 10/01/93 A letter of compliance was delivered to
Coleman-Adams office in Lynchburg, VA stating
the corrections and requirements necessary to
complete work. A deadline of October 8, 1993
was given for completion (attached).
5) 10/11/93 The project was inspected by R. A. Shaw, no
work started (pictures taken, attached).
6) 10/26/93 Corrections started on the site by the
Albemarle County Engineering Department.
RAS/
Attachment
Copy: Reading File
~
'.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Engineering
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5861
October 1, 1993
Coleman-Adams Construction, Inc.
Post Office Box 368
Forest, VA 24551
Re: Murray Elementary School
Erosion Control Plan #1122
Gentlemen:
Requirements of the approved erosion control plan at Murray
Elementary School have not been met. The project is lying dormant
without any effort to complete soil stabilization on the site. Jo
Higgins, Director of Engineering, has made several attempts to
have work completed on the site, however, there has been no
response. A meeting was held at the project site on July 28,
1993, with Jo Higgins, George Shiflett, Joe Coleman and myself to
go over in detail the problems. Ms. Higgins informed Mr. Coleman
that he had until August 28, 1993 to have a written plan to remedy
the problems into the Engineering Department or the bond would be
called and the work completed. No plan was submitted.
The required work and/or corrections needed to comply with
the approved erosion control plan and Handbook are as follows:
1) Vegetation is sparse on scattered areas of the site and these
areas must be overseeded. The largest of these areas is the
playing field.
2) Gully erosion is occurring at several locations and must be
repaired and stabilized.
a) The backfill has washed off of the pipe under the playing
field and must be repaired.
b) Several gullies in the fill slope at the end of the
sidewalk on the east side the site must be repaired and
stabilized.
c) The drainage ditch at the bottom of the slope on the east
side of the site must be repaired and stabilized.
d) Minor ditch repair is needed near the end of the fence on
the northeast side of the project.
/(7" ~//- 'lJ -
/_ .//" ~ c"'" _",-r
/7 - ~~.- ""'- f'---~,.-e .-' ;1'-....
r~l<-·h
FAX (804) 972-4060
·
Coleman-Adams Construction, Inc.
October 1, 1993
Page Two
e) Rill and gully repair is required in the area of the gate to
the stormwater detention basin.
3) Gully erosion is also occurring near the outfall of the pipe
under the playing field and in the ditchline of the service
road to the stormwater basin which requires rip-rap
stabilization; however, Jo Higgins has stated to Mr. Coleman
that the Coleman-Adams subcontractor, Parham, had submitted a
price and additional pay will be provided to correct this
problem.
Note: Please be aware that soil stabilization is not determined to
be satisfactory until such time that it is mature enough to
prevent erosion under severe weather conditions.
The above noted work and/or corrections must be completed on
or before the end of the working day, Friday, October 8, 1993. If
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,.. ~~
/~'O': ~-
Robert A. Shaw
Erosion Control Officer
RAS/
Deliver
Copy: Jo Higgins
Babette Thorpe
George Shiflett
Jane Waller
Rêoeived By:
r"'fS ~} 'f\\t1
ßlf.~!Þib' /(: II .
OCT 0 1 ...
Date:
" EM AN ADAMS CON:, L. Ii
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Engineering
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296·5861
August 3, 1992
Mr. Joe Coleman
Coleman-Adams Construction, Inc.
Post Office Box 368
Forest, VA 24551
Re: Murray Elementary School
Erosion Control Plan #1122
Dear Mr. Coleman:
As you requested, an inspection was made at Murray Elementary
School to determine the status of the erosion control performance
bond. The grass at the rear of the building is unsatisfactory and
may need over seeding. Several areas are beginning to erode and
will need repairs. One of these areas is along the access road
near the stormwater basin and the other is adjacent to the rip-rap
ditch just below the playground.
Your performance bond cannot be released, however, is being
reduced to $16,660.00.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
~,.-'~ c?'- ./þ--
,,- e ¿Y--
Robert A. Shaw
Erosion Control Officer
RAS/vlh
Copy: Babette Thorpe
Alton Carver
é'-/ z.. - <y 2- -
/'7' 0--'-
<?ø-/ 5"/"",1";-/ .--.....//-, -·r~ =-./o--..r
/ ./'-
/"7-:
/" /~"...-
...
C<7/rec;.-:T-/é7/'1 s_
FAX (804) 972-4060
.~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Engineering
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22901-4596
(804) 296-5861
EROSION CONTROL PERFORMANCE BOND REDUCTION
:PROJECT NAME:
//,7 Vr/'"AY .5'C.h~ A-/o-//;-/"';' Q."./ "'<:C:;/fc>-~o./7~/'...Í
PLAN/PERMIT NO.:
//¿ Z-
DATE:
7-Zr"?~
This project has been partially completed and the erosion control
~ .
performance bond may be reduced to $ / ~ 6'60 , () t:J
-
~ ç;;./~
Erosion Control En~orcement O~~1cer
Copy: Department of Zoning
7/1/88
?r-,J
0/1
ATTACHMENT 2
LAW OFFICES
DAVIDSON & SAKOLOSKY, P.C.
916 MAIN STREET
P. O. BOX 798
TELEFAX (804) 528-0105
FRANK G. DAVIDSON, III
JAMES J. SAKOLOSKY
CARY P. MOSELEY
LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA 24505
(804) 847-4444
FRANK G DAVIDSON, JR.
(1907-1991)
July 7, 1995
VIA FAX AND U.S. MAIL
v'uUNTY OF ALBEM[\';LÉ
....co·,.,'\
. ',\ \
, I, i.
, ¡ ;,;,
11 ; ~;
/J ~ ~~~
'ry"..*·1....'" jt· , ì L
".j.~,. ~.",::_._' 4.--"
Mark A. Trank, Esquire
Office of County Attorney
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
- ,- '''.. R l\.U':'.V . '.,- <'.J.. ..··t· ",,- ,
~~,J t~~.! ~) . I ,-~
RE: Bond #4634756; Coleman-Adams Construction Co., Inc.
Soil Erosion Permit #1122
Dear Mr. Trank:
This is in response to your letter dated June 29, 1995.
Coleman-Adams would like to reach a compromise in this matter, but
believes that the County's final demand in an amount of $13,500.00
does not reasonably reflect the County's share of responsibility
for the remedial costs growing as large as they did. Coleman-Adams
believes if it had been promptly notified by the County that some
areas of grass had not matured satisfactorily, that much of the
later erosion could have been avoided.
After our recent conversation, Mr.A.C. Coleman, Jr.,
President of Coleman-Adams, spoke with Jo Higgins, Director of
Engineering, to explore possible ways to avoid litigation and break
the apparent impasse between the parties. Ms. Higgins, in essence,
informed him that the decision was final and the matter was out of
her hands.
As a result Coleman-Adams is hereby invoking its right under
§7-7 of the Albemarle County Erosion and Sedimentation Control
ordinance to apply for and receive a review of the actions of the
director of engineering in the interpretation of the regulations
regarding this matter. We are hopeful that review by the Board of
Supervisors will resolve this matter without litigation.
Although the provisions of §7-7 do not expressly preclude
bringing a civil action while a matter is being reviewed by the
Board, it seems apparent that the intent of that section is to
enable such review before litigation is initiated. We ask that you
not file suit until after review by the Board.
Mark A. Trank
July 7, 1995
Page 2
Please consider this letter to be Coleman-Adams' application
for review by the Board pursuant to §7-7. By copy of this letter I
am notifying the Board of Supervisors and the director of
engineering that Coleman-Adams is hereby applying for a review by
the Board of the director's decision that Coleman-Adams is
obligated to reimburse County expenses in an amount of $13,500.00
under the provisions of the Albemarle County Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Ordinance, §§7-1, et seq. If it is necessary
to complete an application form or to provide additional
information, please inform me.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
DAVIDSON & SAKOLOSKY, P.C.
~~~
James J. Sa olosk
JJS/spc
cc: Mr. Walter F. Perkins, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Ms. Jo Higgins, Director of Engineering
ATTACHMENT 3
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of County Attorney
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-45%
LARRY W. DAVIS
COUNTY ATTORNEY
January 27, 1995
PHONE (804) 972-4067
FAX (804) 972-4068
Ms. Jane Waller
James A. Scott and Son, Inc.
P. O. Box 10489
Lynchburg, Virginia 24506
Re: Bond #4634756: Hartford Fire Insurance Company (surety);
Coleman Adams Construction Company, Inc., Soil Erosion
Permit #1122
Dear Ms. Waller:
This letter is being sent to you as agent for the Hartford Fire Insurance
Company, surety under the attached Soil Erosion Performance Bond. You have
previously been notified by the Albemarle County Zoning Department as well as the
County Attorney's Office that Coleman Adams Construction Company, Inc.,.principal,
has failed to perform the work required under Soil Erosion Control Plan # 1122 and has
defaulted under the terms of this Bond. Because of this default, Albemarle County has
been forced to arrange for corrective work at a cost to the County of $13,500.00. A
certification of funds expended dated June 6, 1994 is also attached.
We hereby demand payment in the amount of $13,500.00 pursuant to the
terms of said Bond. Your check in this amount must be received by this office no later
than February 6, 1995. Failure to transmit payment by this date will result in legal
action to recover this amount. In addition, acceptance of future bonds by this surety or
by your agency in Albemarle County may be jeopardized.
Please note that full documentation of the principal's failure to complete
the required work in a satisfactory manner has previously been supplied to the attorney
for Coleman Adams. To my knowledge, there is no legal basis for withholding payment
to the County.
.. .
Ms. Jane R Waller
January 27, 1995
Page 2
Please contact the undersigned if you wish to discuss this matter. Your
immediate attention to this matter is expected and appreciated.
~
MarkA. Trank
Deputy County Attorney
cc: Jo Higgins, Director of Engineering (w/o enc.)
James R Richards, Esquire (wI enc.)
MAT2/HARTFORD.LO 1
.. .
SOIL EROSION
PERFORMANCE BOND WITH SURETY
Know all men by these present, that we, tlWL'fNfÄft1"~èoNSr.lINC.
COLEMAN ADAMS CONSTRUCTION) INC. , principal (s) I and
·{))m:"'(·7'~;-:""" 0.' .;~'. ,.~ 7\
1... -. I -", II ; ...'"
U~ k ¥ it; tl \J 1J;, 10
OCT 2 4 l~~u
o{
"
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY , surety, are held
and firmly bound unto the County of Albemarle, Virginia, in the
panal sum of $50,320.00/00- - - - - - - - - - - , for the payment' ot
which, well and truly to be made, we hereby jointly and sev~rally
bind ourselves, our høirs, executors, administrators, successors
and assigns.
The condition ot the above obligation is such that whereas
0."'.
the said
COLEMAN ADAMS CONSTRUCT10Nr INr.
, did on the
12th day of
June
, 19~1 fila with the county of
Alb~marle, plans and specitic~tions for c~rtain improvements and
other measures relating to the control at erosion and sedimen-
tation from land disturbing activities as shown on the said plans
and specifications, numbered
1122, werQ submitted pursuant to
Section 7-3 at the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance
of Albemarle County virginia, and which are attached hereto and
are incorporated herein by reference, relating to property which
is briefly described as follows: MUJ:TnV Schnnl T0h
Now.therefore, if the said principal shall complete th~ said
land disturbing activities and shall WQll and faithfully complete
and perform the said improvements and measures relating th~reto,
in accordance with the said plans and specifications, including
payment of all lawful claims ol contractors, subcontractors,
materialman, and laborers for all labor performed and materials
·
_._ __... ..__. ._ ._n__····d *. ____.____·____n.__
·furnished in the completion of the said improvements, on or
bafore the 19thday of September , 19--2L, then this
obligation shall be void, otherwise the same ahall remain in
full force and effect; provided that if, at any time during the
term hereof, the principal shall commit and/or suffer or permit
the commission or existence o~ any act, omission, or condition
which shall constitute a violation of the Albemarle county
Erosion and Sedimentation control Ordinance, including any
failure to comply with tha plans and ~pecifications as aforesaid
in acco~dance with the Virginia Erosion and Sedimentation Control
Handbook, and shall fail to abate such violation after written
notification th~raof by the Director of Engin~ering of Albemarle
County within the t~me specified in such notification, then all
or such part 'of this obligation as may bQ raquired, including the
security hereof shall be immediat~ly payable to the County of
AlbemarlQ for purposes of abating such violation; and provided
furthQr that no payment made under tha authority of the preceding
provision shall in any way affect, impair, or diminish the
obligation of the principal to compl~te, and perform th~ improve-
ments and mQasuras herQinabovQ described.
The said surety, for value received, her.by stipulates and
agreQs that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition
to the plans and specifications aforesaid ahall in any way affQct
ita obligation on this bond and it do~s hereby waive noticQ of
any such change, extension of time, altQration or addition.
Upon notification in writing by the County Engineer or County
Zoning Administrator for Albemarle county that the principal
.. ~
. ~
.
has defaulted and is in default under the terms of this bond,
the surety shall immediately pay to the County of Albemarle
the entire sum·secured under this bond. The County or its agents
shall apply the proceeds to abatement of th~ violation including
any actual costa of administration to the county, upon completion
of which any ~emaining sum shall be raimburs~d to the surety.
In witness Whereof, the said
COLEMAN ADAMS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
and
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
have caused this-
instrument to b~ executed and sealed by their respective duly
authorized officers t~ia
23rd day of
October
, 1921L-'
~Þ>/V7,Ji (~'1;JØ . Il,/¿;¡qf'lD
APPROVED AS/ '];0 FO: J)
COUNTY ATTORNEY
B~OLEMAN, ADANS CO~C.
~e Sec/Tre.,
BY::
~FORD F(# INSURANCE COM7Y
M...L/ . W 4)/ b$
Jane R. Waller Attorney-in-Fact
. ~ ~ /t:J-Jo -<Jt?
ACCEPTED:
COUNTY ENGINEER
~
BOND #
4634756
AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS:
JAMES A. SCOTT & SON, INC.
---..-...
P.O. Bx 10489
Lynchburg, Va. 24506
Rev. 2/01/90
'. ' .
BREAKDOWN OF V. L. MURRAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE WORK
EROSION CONTROL CORRECTIVE WORK
(Bond Requirements)
1. Williams Loader service
For: labor, equipment & materials
for work described in 10/1/93 letter
* $ 9,575.00
Purchase Order #93-2279
Paid by Check #316606 dated 12/3/93
2. Building Services $ 2,775.00
For: seed, fertilizer, mulch
(materials only)
(funds not available to reimburse Building
Services until bonds are in hand)
$12,350.00
1,235.00
$13,585.00
10% Labor (for #2 above & administration)
Agreed Final Cost NTE
$13,500.00
OTHER WORK ACCOMPLISHED
(Not Included in Bond Requirements)
3. Williams Loader Service
For: channel stabilization -
install rip-rap includes labor,
equipment & materials
* $10,500.00
Purchase Order #93-2278
Paid by Check #316606 dated 12/3/93
* Shared MObilization Cost
Certify Funds Have Been Paid:
Æ~~~~
MELVIN A. BREEDEN
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
¿ -b - <J',?
DATE
~
<f1),t -+ s/J7
FAX TRANSMITTAL
TO Dana Hubbard FROM L E Neher
CO Daily Progress CO Albemarle County
DEPT Classified PBONE # 296-5843
FAX # 978-7223 FAX # 296-5800
$CLASS,MOnAd,AlbemarleCounty
PUBLIC NOTICE\qcr\
Albemarle County\qcr\
Board of Supervisors\qcr\
September 6, 1995\qcr\
...Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, will conduct a public hearing on September 6, 1995, 10:30
a.m., Meeting Room #241, Second Floor, County Office Building, 401 McIntire
Road, Charlottesville, Virginia, to consider an ordinance amending and
reordaining Chapter 4, Section 4-19(a), to add subsection (35) to include
Peacock Hill Subdivision as one of those areas where dogs are prohibited from
running at large.\qlr\
...A complete copy of the wording of this ordinance amendment may be obtained
from the Clerk, Fourth Floor, County Office Building, 401 McIntire Road,
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or by
calling 296-5843\qlr\
...Public comments are invited at this time\qlr\
...By Order of the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia.\qlr\
...Reasonable accommodations will be provided to persons with disabilities, if
requested. Please call 296-5827.\qlr\
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC\qlr\
Purchase Order No. A-757
Bill to: Albemarle County
Account Number 204066
Date: August 16, 1995
Date Run: August 21 and August 29, 1995
*
*
*
*
~ /?f:.ø ø/ýJ~
I
~F DAIL~~, Charlottesv1lle! Va..AbKfay, August 21, .1995
- -
1 Legals
PUBLIC NO 11(;':
Albemarle County
:Board of Supervi~
September6.199S
~e is hereby given... I. ..
. of County Su~ GI
Memarle County. Virgi.... wiI
ceMucl a public h~ 011
s.pe.mber6. 1995. 10:...m..
MMIina Room 1#241. ....,.
Floor. "tountyOffice ~
. 401 Mcintire Road. Ch.......
""... Vir9inia, to conside, l1li If-
~eamendil)garíd r""-
~Chapter 4, Sëction 4-11(1).
.. _ subsection (35) ... In-
.. Peacock Hill Sutidhiilian
Ii one ðf those area ....
_ are prohibited frOlft run-
~at~r. ..
...A .. e e copy of the ___
... GI . orärønœ 8INIId-
....may be obtained E..
CIeItI. Fourth Floor. Co. u Of-
lee Building. 401 .
AMid. between the ho.... ..
.. I.m. and 5:00 p.m., Moft.
_Ivough Friday, or by cdng
2I6-!IB43.
...Pulllic comments are InIIW
..... time. .
~Order of· the eo_ òI
. . . . Supervisors of AIle-
'. unty. Virginia. .
. . - nable accommodIIIaN
wi próvided to persona.
.....ities.if requested. ~
".S·p27.
.. W. Carey. Clerk, CMC
1MEoM..Y~~"'" Va.~__,ÞuøA2I· ...-
-
PUBLIC NOTIOJ
Albemarle Cour!W
~..':' ."ard of supervi....
·0 September6,19Ø.
~ is hereby given.....
.... of County SuperW ers of
~e County. Virg."
~. a public haan on
. ~r 6. 1995. 10:.""".
RRoom 1#241.· IICIIIId
unty Office ~
_Intire Road. C~
..' . Virginia, to consider. or-
....amending and reordaln-
~ a.pter 4. section 4-1I(a),
~ IIdcI Mlbsection (35) 1II...f:
èkØ Peacock Hill Sutídlvl_.
.. ... of those area ....
.... are prohibited from run-
'*" at...
-
:.A comPlete copy of the WII r6-
ilia í.. GI J this ordinance -..n6-
mint rney be obtained from ..
Clerk, Fourth Floor, ColUIIr Of-
b. Building. 401 Mclndre
Aoed, between the hours of
.:00 .."" and 5:00 p.m., Non-
day through Friday. or by.....
2116-5143. . .
:..Publlc; comments arelrwillld
at thI. time.
...Øy 0Ntr of the ao.d of
CoUnty Supervisors of AI. I»-
.....Ço¡¡nty,Vir inia.
...~re accommodlllons
... _pIOIIided to person......
-=:... if requested. PIeaie
* '5127. -
Ella W. c..y, Clerk. CMC
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
R Ivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
ScottsviUe
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
FROM:
To Whom Addressed
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ~
September 8, 1995
lØfu7
~
MEMO TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Ordinance Adopted by the Board on September 6, 1995
Attached for your use is a copy of an ordinance which was adopted by the Board
on September 6, 1995:
(1) An ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 4, Animals and Fowl, Article
2, DOGS, Division 2, Running at Large, of the Code of Albemarle in
Section 4-19, by adding subsection 35, Peacock Hill, as one of those
areas where dogs are prohibited from running at large.
EWC:len
Attachment (1)
cc: John Miller
Stephen Helvin
Cindy Persater
Municipal Code
I··
*
Printed on recycled paper
ORDINANCE NO. 95-4(2)
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 4, ANIMALS AND FOWL,
ARTICLE 2, DOGS, DIVISION 2, RUNNING AT LARGE, OF THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA.
BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 4, Animals and Fowl, Article 2,
Dogs, Division 2, Running at Large, is hereby amended and
reordained by amending section 4-19, In certain areas, as
follows:
ARTICLE II. Dogs.
Division 2. Runnina at Larae.
Sec. 4-19. In certain areas.
(35) Peacock Hill as recorded in the Office of the Clerk of
the Circuit Court of the County in Deed Book 589, pages
205-212; Deed Book 708, pages 286; Deed Book 777, pages
039; Deed Book 904, pages 182, Deed Book 960, page 174;
Deed Book 1025, page 610; Deed Book 1123, pages 071;
Deed Book 1189, page 407; Deed Book 1310, page 128.
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that this is a true,
correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted by the Albemarle
Board of County Supervisors at a regular meeting held on
September 6, 1995.
~. ?
Q'¿¿ p¿/ ~;!e~
Clerk, Board of County pervisors
;Þ~
"
l'
OÌ1irltuatid I¡ _d: 1:(-;'.2"
~ Item No. f?52?~~.f:..£ ?¿?
96t)! 0
DRAFT: August 31.1995
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 4, ANIMALS AND FOWL,
ARTICLE 2, DOGS, DIVISION 2, RUNNING AT LARGE, OF THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA.
BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that
Chapter 4, Animals and Fowl, Article 2, Dogs, Division 2, Running at Large, is hereby amended
and reordained by amending section 4-19, In certain areas, as follows:
ARTICLE II. Does.
Division 2. Runnine at Laree.
Sec. 4-19. In certain areas.
~ Peacock Hill as recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the
County in Deed Book 589. DageS 205-212: Deed Book 708. page 286: Deed Book
777 page 039: Deed Book 904 Dage 182: Deed Book 960 page 174: Deed Book
1025 page 610: Deed Book 1123 page 071: Deed Book 1189 page 407: and Deed
Book 1310 page 128.
4 19.004
t 1 ,. J
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
.
Dlsm:z,UTED TO BOARD fA¡;M5ERS
ON __1l~~1..::!l. \
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Dog Leash Law Amendement
AGENDA DATE:
Aug., 2, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
9~o'l 0;). ( S:,; )
INFORMATION:
ACTION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Request for a public hearing to amend Section 4-19(a) of the
County Code to add Peacock Hill Subdivision to the list of areas
requiring leashes for dogs at large.
CONSENT AGENDA: X
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Huft: Blank
ATIACHMENTS:
{)~.JV
REVIEWED BY: V'G I'
DISCUSSION:
The Peacock Hills Subdivision in Ivy requests to be included in the County's dog leash ordinance. Approximately 71 % of the residences
within Peacock Hills have signed a petition in favor of the dog leash law (95 out of 134). There are 43 vacant lots in the community. The
petition is on file in the Board office.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that a public hearing be set to amend County Code Section 4-19( a) to include the Peacock Hills Subdivision in the dog leash
law area. The public hearing can be set for September 6, 1995 at 1 0:00am.
" ?11Øi
EXDOG.WPD
95.125
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsvil1e
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
July 14, 1995
Ms. Cindy Perfater
Peacock Hill Community Association
PO Box 11
Ivy, VA 22945
Dear Ms. Perfater:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of a petition from the
residents of Peacock Hill Subdivision requesting the Board of
Supervisors include this area under the County's dog leash law.
This item is being placed on the August 2, 1995, consent agenda
for the Board of Supervisor to set a public hearing. The public
hearing will be scheduled for September 6, 1995, at 10:00 a.m.
You or a representative of Peacock Hill need to be present
at the September 6 meeting. If you have any questions, please
call me at 296-5843.
EWC:mms
V~erY truly your~,
;1 ~J (/ ' ~
E lW-Carey, lfe~
cc: Richard E. Huff, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
PEACOCK HILL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
Post Office Box 11
Ivy, Virginia 22945
, 0
July 7, 1995
County of Albemarle
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901-4596
To Whom It May Concern:
On behalf of the Peacock Hill Community Association I am enclosing
a petition to obtain a "County Dog Leash Law". We presently have
137 residences and 43 vacant lots. We are having numerous problems
with dogs running at large (some of which are owned by residents and
some that are not).
We are desperate to obtain this law in order to regain control of
our neighborhood.
Should you need further information, please give me a call at
296-2484.
Sincerely,
~(~/~~f~~tarY
Peacock Hill Community Association
Enclosures
. .
I.
-
-
. .-
.:t:
~.
y
o
y
~
~
b
@
,........
f""""'
~
E
£
~
:;
c
'ê
~
~
¿
~
c
0
i
.¡,:
ð
£
~
r--
c
0
~
æ
~
\0
§
.t::
~
~
£
9
æ
$
-
~
~
ä
0
'0 ~
Q
i
I
IDtu..~ r.J ~ fbÐ T HCJ"1ß-
: Q. Ø\ -Z / veiE:-'I ~~ d bE. ~~ 7; ~t
;;'L¡D T:"~. ~ S- ~-r.~
S~!> !.~'^'. 50~ ~£"'.
()..d C~· tU Îé Jl.t 0(."" ìk
7ò( ft~r0
7ô}o AcuN
7òi Aw.N
dI.o \ \Ve "t 't (;66E
HD ~t-p~
~~~ \VU<Vi ~~~
d- ,e¡ '\ ve..'.::.~ 'f ~d6~
~ 7-s' r+e£oN W.
~3S' H t.e.orJ LN.
5 ð 1 7t~töt-~
t.t^t V (t A t. b L K-
.
"'-------
/
-.
"'7 0 do- Ac:oe.rv
,0 ç A~uJ
,t) Affl e-
~ ().. ~ l:>~ \,; N'1 \ Mt-:
Õ'O~ b ì \ II'hl"\~ Mr.
ì q.., (C»· I 1; /\P1~ (\'it,
'O~ Appt E..
(7..~4..\ T ~'C \/ "C" ~d b!:.
~ ì 0 \ ute. "-~ If- t~ ð IÆ.
õHo\.j T~~~'t ~tl6E:.
.
Enfrry
díJ fj (,?,
.
~ ~o ì:¡L.
Lt$f ~ S~ 40
~
PETITION FOR DOG "LEASH" ORDINANCE J~ ~~.
: ',. c-u '-' l~ ' I !2ot - _Q.._'tt~,
,Ie I l"esidents of T I;" ACve....~ ì I J (subdivision or other
area), respectfully request that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
include this area under the provisions of County Code Section 4-19(b) which
makes it unlawful for any dog to roam, run, or self-hunt off of the property
of its owner or custodian and not be under the owner's or custodian's
immediate control, the law commonly referred to as the "Leash" Ordinance.
1.
~~~:~
) '.J
~.,.. -._ Vv ~~~_ r-'j,~
}) 13 ~:.- Z '2- 'Z.-
~
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7 .
8.
11.
12.
134
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22. 1 "!>,
! 23. J:?z~.'øAcU£ ß~:l;)..T
24. J)ð4t4.) Y. _ø f.~)¿\ ~ -1(~ ¡If.
I .3 4- tßAJ Ii.'/'/-);:!"
q 5 o...p P(O¡)¿
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
25.
26.
~ ~ 2.t~
1Z kt L.L-t-. 2.0$"
~ ~~..::s- :Jð7
tlßn é~1 21j" :
'\
..........
"
(
I
(Sheet No. of Sheets)
- -
~ETITION FOR DOG "LEASH" ORDINANCE /7
WON
lie'" r~side'nts of EAt.Ot.-'(..}-t ~ \ (subdivision or other
area), respectfully request that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
include this area under the provisions of County Code Section 4-19(b) which
makes it unlawful for any dog to roam, run, or self-hunt off of the property
of its owner or custodian and not be under the owner's or custodian's
immediate control, the law commonly referred to as the "Leash" Ordinance.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7 .
8.
9.
12. /lJ~ 4",/ .#~s.
13.
14. ..
::: ~~'~'Cf~~':"<)
~,I 7
17.C' _6~ylm)1a~~
. L.- /':'
'" .r--¡...~\ \,. " "1'--r"7 A t' If::..
,-,.'. It' .. \ ;..... 1/.1
25. ~Q HeyoV\.. l-....~~
1: ß'70H~ J-A¡.Jf.-
28. 35"0 d~h Ärvf..
29. ~'-Io lIêLoY\, ~t
30. 3.3~ ~'41l ).~Né
31. ~5 ¡¿4>f\ Wt.
32. ~C /k,4,h tArv.e.
33, ~ 15 h4LoI'\ lAve
- ..
34. 3~5 )/U01\ WE
35. à"S Jha~ 4,Je.
36. 36E> ~- tA-N~
37. 38G ~ \'"Or", /-A-,Jf.;
38.
~9. ~'JŠ $41\. tA"'C
40~ ~j ~~~~.~
41 . ~8 5 -r(;R.Kc'j RI~" f4.
42. 300 I~Y\. LAtJt.-
I
1i~
19 ;;."
tt"'; .
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
........ ~3; ..lifs~I?-;c~::IJ;p,c-~~~~c,
44. ;G0Ô .~ L.~
.-
45. 3/ö -¡¡;~ ~yft-ø-4
46. ~ eJ. 'Î.:) !/:/?In Lorr~
47.
/
/
/
/
48.
(Sheet No. ____ of ____ Sheets)
· , PETITION FOR DOG "LEASH" ORDINANCE 6; G ðA JC..
;Ie, residents of ~AC.t)C.)c... f-f lj (subdivision or other
area), respectfully request that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
include this area under the provisions of County Code Section 4-19(b) which
makes it unlawful for any dog to roam, run, or self-hunt off of the property
of its owner or custodian and not be under the owner's or custodian's
inunediate control, the law conunonly referred to as the "Leash" Ordinance.
~£. Acló~ss tJ:-
.------:.-Q I < JI Ð ~.J-.~(} .. ~ _ - ,;I
1. _ /ù\Ai' ~/, -N./lY/(/ls- h01 /þ:<.'(¡ ·~5.
" , f.¿c,
2. c:xtUA, ".-J~V¡u.." t/2 ð'J Q,aJ, 26,
:: ~ji;:J;::::;;<~<-O:;~~b:::
¿'
5. 29.
6. 30.
7. 31.
8. 32.
9. 33.
10. 34.
11. 35.
12. 36.
13. 37.
14. 38.
15. 39.
16. 40.
17. 41.
18. 42.
19. 43.
20. 44.
21. 45.
22. 46.
23. 47.
24. 48.
(Sheet No.
--.
of Sheets)
PETITION FOR DOG "LEASH" ORDINANCE 7~~t- 1::1-,
· ¡(e~· residents of ~ACO~ ~ 1-1: t I (subdivision or other
~~eaj, respectfully request that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
include this area under the provisions of County Code Section 4-l9(b) which
makes it unlawful for any dog to roam, run, or self-hunt off of the property
of its owner or custodian and ~ot be under the owner's or custodian's
immediat control, th law commonly eferred to as the "Leash" Ordinance.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
-27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
(Sheet No. of Sheets)
- -
PETITION FOR DOG "LEASH" ORDINANCE
'/e~ r~~idents of ~Ac.o::-JC. 1/, ( II (subdivision or other
area), respectfully request that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
include this area under the provisions of County Code Section 4-l9(b) which
makes it unlawful for any dog to roam, run, or self-hunt off of the property
of its owner or custodian and not be under the owner's or custodian's
immediate control, the law commonly referred to as the "Leash" Ordinance.
c--~ / ~ . . ç fllkly W.
.~. /, I c;r .1.~./L. ~
f I ~
2. . ð j{/~~/-.-/L. ·1 )o/C/~/ S- ~ ~
'7 (::-'t. "Iff:./~ I -----'\ (-Ot..J
... '/.-:Iy:/,· .j ; 06-,
'Ilk I~// );7 ßAj¡:t¡ . 0 ðt...¡
/'!Jb~'- ~j;~~
~~ $'}~
Cì ~< D/Iµ~~()a_ ~11-f
ß 33.
Lib ~ 7~~4 .
2:>13 35.
701 {.b1lW 36 .
1.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13~
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
#~~
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
'"'
47.
48.
(Sheet No. ____ of ____ Sheets)
PETITION FOR DOG "LEASH" ORDINANCE
¡Ie": ;e~idents of "--~Ac......t>L~ H: \ \ (subdivision or other
area), respectfully request that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
include this area under the provisions of County Code Section 4-19(b) which
makes it unlawful for any dog to roam, run, or self-hunt off of the property
of its owner or custodian and not be under the owner's or custodian's
immediate control, the law commonly referred to as the "Leash" Ordinance.
/ /~.
. a~~f/!i ~
1.
. k~t1~
dllOI/,4"""- ~5.
2. 26.
3. 27.
4. 28.
5. 29.
6. 30.
7. 31.
8. 32.
9. 33.
10. 34.
11. 35.
12. 36.
13. 37.
14. 38.
15. 39.
16. 40.
17. 41.
18. 42.
19. 43.
20. 44.
21. 45.
22. 46.
23. 47.
24. 48.
(Sheet No. of Sheet f
~ITION FOR DOG "LEASH" ORDINANCE
¡/e~ r~;idents of rEA~U:::- H-: I \ (subdivision or other
area), respectfully request that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
include this area under the provisions of County Code Section 4-19(b) which
makes it unlawful for any dog to roam, run, or self-hunt off of the property
of its owner or custodian and not be under the owner's or custodian's
immediate control, the law commonly referred to as the "Leash" Ordinance.
1.
/) '\. ~\~1 '. .
~..- \\. ..'~7)c.
, '} (":t....'v'-.. '-L .. . /.... ';~ ·/"·":1 v _ . /..'
....) '/~ ..,C/,.
.! ; 1,- ~ ("/1-",,- '
¿:! ,~!...... ../. /..1 ; / c> C'
o f....
I ) / (~: ,)!. .r;
. it (}"·'--14/J.../'_-':/V \... l..c <..(-(,1_ I."-r·~(/
("'I. ß ~- ..
':;\.Qv fL,,-,- -"'-, C-""-"'-'(^
'~~~{/\ ç> c::~- --~1-~'-{. '\.1 {
v , '+ " >;.:;
(~-< i (_............\cx.., ;'1.. .-~,L ,-_...:.-.~__
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7 .
8.
9.
I,
. v·,
10.
11.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
~-' /,,) -~
¿///2/%'j. -. ¡If;
, , ,
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
25.
26.
"~
J" i
,~J't\f~ 17 _ ~A' , i
C/.,., ...',/7//.// /,'//.. ~
..-;'.'....., ~r
~ Ä ./ .-C' ~-<-.
~~Y/Ji~
~~
(Sheet No. of Sheets)
- - '
73A-Ol-6A Grevi11e Thomas N E Eta1 L-6A B-1 06
73Þ.-01-6B :STONER, DAVID W , L-6B S-1 PEACOCK HILL
~Ji\.':'Ol--=6C JI~1'T1?~N .__ KENNETH 0 L-6C 8-1 PEACOCK HILL
23..è~J.-=--7------.-S111TH. AHN ANGLE PARCEL 7
131\-Ql-7A NQ'£__U3:e;J:L(ÇPMBINED_WITH 73A-01-7)
73A-Ol-7B HPT US,ED.(CQMB_IN.E!ILHI..'.L'H 73A-01-7)
H___··L3.A.~Q.1,~Zç NO'¡'_tISED(COMBINED WITH 73A-01-7)
_.7JA::-OJ=_8____._ NOT USED SEE 73A-01-19
Il_l'i-=-_QJ_-_9L-!'10T __USED SEE 73A-OI-20 & 21
NOT USED SEE 73A-01-20 & 21
NOT USED SEE 73A-OI-20 & 21
NOT USED SEE 73A-01-22
NOT USED SEE 73A-OI-22
73A-OI-IOC NOT USED SEE 73A-OI-22
--------Nº'J'-U~~I>._____SEE 73A-OI-23 & 24
73A-OI-IIB NOT USED SEE 73A-OI-23 & 24
73A-Ol'::11C---NOT-usEri-- SEE 73A-OI-23 & 24
73A-Ol-=-Üi"Ä--'-NOT -USED SEE 73A-OI-24 & 25
7~~~-~i~ljª= ~ºT_QSED SEE 73A-OI-24 & 25
73A-01-12 NOT USED SEE 73A-OI-24 & 25
A-Ol-13 GA88. KARL B OR SUSAN I L-13 S-l P~ACOCJ{."'µTLL 2.248 SM
RICHARD ErAL L-14 S-1 PF.ACCX:::K HILL
73A-1-l5 Block Gene D. et a1 L-15 S-l Peacock Hill 2.250
73A-1-16 Behr, Ric ar L~i6 s~i 2.24 8M
,73A-OI-17 WILLIAMS, I.ARRY M OR MARIA B El'AL L-17 S-1 PEACCX.:K HILL 8M
- - JOHN C ETAL L-18 8-1 PEACOCK H
73A-1-19 GLICK, OORIS F L-19 S-l pE'.AC(X;K HILL 8M
:ß-Q1~20_ 8J.Mr.ms..t--IW1:\LQ....N..ETAL L-20 S-l PEACCX~K HTTJ:! ----.J2.3.____SI
73A-01-~. MARY CATHERINE L-2I 8-1 PF¡COCK HTT.T. 8M
73A-1-22 CHANDLER, C ROXANNE L-22 8-.1 PFACDCK HIlL 0.286 8M
73Ã~òi~23 IR ELIZABEl'H J L-23A S-1 PF.ACCX:::K lIÏì:L ---
7:3]\-01-24 . ABELL, SHERRY L _ L-24A S-1 PEACOCK HILL
73A-Ol-25 COOK ROBER!' FRANCIS L-25 S-1 PEACCCK HILL 8M
3A-02-lA PEACOCK HILL Cm..Il'-lUN 880C CŒll,rON AREA __5_.JßO_
73A-02-2A PEACOCK HILL CO~"lUN. A880C COltMON AREA 1.8 8
- - A-pßACOCK HILL COMM. ASSOC. ETAL COMMON AREA PEACOCK HILL 18.98
. 73.-02-3B .Not Used (See 73B-02-7A
;73A..:.02....3C HttLU¡SER\1I ·
3A-02-4A PEACOCK HILL COMMUN A880C COMMON AREA 2. ..0 8
73A-03_-I FINN, PAUL A__ L-l Ph-II S-4 PEACOC!< HILL SH
73A-03-2 DUESER RAYr-DNJ) D ETAL L-2 PH-2 S-4 PE'ACXX:K HILL
73A~3-3 SMITH FRANK FOLSCM L-3 S-4 Ph-2 PEACOCK HIT .T.
13A-3-4 GILLIAM'!=: 1'vY\TT1\.YT17\TU ...~ --
l
·" 73-~.s..._flACK.A!U),__ROBERT H, ETAL _l~~~________~Hn_
73-36T Ta lorÞ Harle Robert or Lorraine L-7E 5.819 SM
3-37 ATUK, NUZHET O. OR ELEANOR M. L-14 10.306 SM
73-37A SCHULTHEIS, RALPH W OR L KAY LOT 13 13.278 SM
73-37B HOLDEN, FRANK B. & ANN P. 20.280 SM
73-38 . Johnson, Katherine M.L. & James F. 143.272 SM
j;;;j8A-MOrrIs;nVivian-H~n. . - 2.39 S G White
73;"18AI--Morrfs-;-Vivian-H~- un n____n_ 2.19 ParceT-X
78 ~ 38B~--HOrrl-s-~--Vìvlan W;-----------~------"-'-·--2-;13~ --g-C-YffiI te------------ - ----------...--'-.--.-
73-38C HENSLEY, KEVIN pALE OR DIANE REA 2.350
73-38Cl GUNDE, KEVIN E OR JEAN 0 3.368
73-38D }VRRIS, B~ W 1.430
73-38E . J:·DRRIS, BRENDA W 0.540
~7 - SF MoRRIS JAMES H. & VIVIAN W. 4.
! : - SF 1 MoRRIS JAMES H. JR. & KARLA Z. 2.004
73-39 DELETE SUBDIVIDED INTO L-8, 9 & 10 TAYLOR'S MOUNTAIN
73-39A BAILEY, RICHARD E OR DOROTHY H PARCEL A 4.000
73-39B IJAYS i1ICHAEL SETAL P R
7 - C Hvland Christo her Lot I Ta lor's Mt 5.9
73-39C1 CAC LAND TRUST LOT 2 TAYLOR'S MOUNTAIN 6.290
73-39C2 CAC LAND TRUST LOT 3 TAYLOR'S MOUNTAIN 9.820
73-39C3 CAC LAND TRUST LOT 4 TAYLOR'S MOUNTAIN 4.020 SM
73-39C4 HORWITZ, DOUGLAS S OR LYNN LOT 5 TAYLOR'S MOUNTAIN 5.290 SM
73-39C5 CAC LAND TRUST LOT 6 TAYLOR'S MOUNTAIN 5.410 SM
73-39C6 CAC LAND TRUST LOT 7 TAYLOR'S MOUNTAIN 5.460 SM.
73-39C7 JASIURKOWSKI PAUL ETAL LOT
73 39C8 JASIURKOWSKI PAUL ETAL LOT 9 TAYLO '
73-39C9 JASIURKOWSKI, PAUL ETAL LOT 0
73-39D DELETE NOT USED SUBDIVIDED INTO L-1 THRU L-7
- E , RICHARD E PARCEL A
7 =39E~, OORO'lHY H PARCEL B
, RICHARD C PARCEL C
, JOHN DUFF PARCEL D
J=.39E4 BAILEY, RICHARD E OR OOROTHY H PARCEL E
3-40 LARTER, ARTHUR ALEXANDER TAY GAP 1.487
73-41 Carn Walter J or Nanc H Parcel C-2A
7 -41A Hall Janna Taylor Ga 11.385 SM
73-41A1 MCGUIRE, JOHN WILLIAM OR PATRICIA HARLAN PARCEL C-2B 3.168 S
73-41A2 VIISE, MICHAEL G ETAL L-lA RUSH ESTATES ~
73-41A3 FISHER, TllUI'HY E OR SHAOON M L-2A RUSH ESTATE 8M
73 41A4 NGUYEN, TO AN TRONG ETAL L-3 RUSH ESTATES .00 S
7.3-4lA5_BR8DY. FRANClNE~___n_L.::4 RUSH ESTATES_ 2
7 3-41A6 C!51rks-º!1_L.J51~!Lª._.ital _____1.-16 , Rush Estates
73-41B1 RAY DALE REBECCA PARCEL B-1 4.244 8M
7 18-2 RAY TOMMY B. PARCEL B-2 . 01
. 73-41C W er Geor e W. & Nanc V. PAr~.1 ~-~ ~ ^^-
73-41D C~mn Y^1~_
l
,..".,.~~"!,,,,,,,~:~I!'i~~~~~ ._
3B-Ol-62 HILLIGAN L. D. JR, TRS. . ... L-62 3-2 PEACOCK HILLJ. 21 S.l
ß-01-63 MILLIGAN L. D. JR, ;~{S~~·----L-:6~~~=_~--P~~[)~KHtI.!:-_-2--2_r~~!!
B- 0 1- 64 t1e1:~~~l()}l~J_or Ç1 ai j;~_n];.=-64 __ê=-~ .J?~-ª..c::nºº-JLJi-tlJ _~_.4~__ªM
B-01-65 Metz,Lionel or Claire L-65 5-2 Peacock Hill 3.30 5
-738-01-66 Howland, James 5. Etal 2.34, L-66, 5-2 Peacock Hill 5
73R-Ol-67 MANDELL, JAl1ES W OR ETAL L-67 S-2 PEACOCK HILL 2.10 SH'
7 B-01-68 BRAND, ASHER OR LAURA JEAN L- 8 8-2 PEACOCK HILL .272
~g DawsQn. Vernon L-69 S-2 Peacock HI .32
73B-1-70 SULLIVAN, JAMES F & IvIDRIEL G L-70 S-2 PEACOCK HILL
. g Karin L 71 S-2 Peacock HI .25
73B-01-72 BONDING, KARIN BIRGIT L-72 S-2 PEACOCK HILL .248
73B-1-73 DRENAN, PEI'ER J & SARAH M L-73 S-2 PEACOCK HILL 8M
73B-01-74 FRUCH'INICHT, DALE E OR JANE N L-74 S-2 PEACOCK HILL .29 8M
73B-01-75 SCHORGER, WILLIAM D ETAL L-75 S-2 PEACOCK HILL 0.240 SM
73B-1-76 SCHORGER, WILLIAM D & ETAL L-76 S-2 PEACOCK HILL 8M
B- -
B-01-78 DAWSON. DAVID T ETAL L-78 $-2 PEAC~C
73B-01-79 BREWER, JAMES L III L-79 S-2 PEACOCK HILL
73B-1-80 Ba liss, Dou las L-80 S-2 Peacock HI
73B-01-81 HIBBARD, ROBERT C L-81 S-2 PEACOCK HILL 0.240
B- - RO
3B-01-83:a.~ I-IAHRY E ETAL L-83 S-2 PEACOCK HILL .240
73B-1-84 Vinson, Ellen L-84 S-2 Peacock HI
73B-Ol_=B5__NQT USE1L...C.m,IDINFm ~UTH 73B-01-R6&84
7.3B-01-86 TRI A RAF L
738-1-87 NOT USED COMBINED WITH 7381-86 &
73B-01-88 roNAID, PATILID E TRUST L-88 PEACOCK HILL .440
73B-01-89 KILLI-IAM MICHAEL A OR ETAL L-89 S-2 PEACOCK HILL SM ;
73B-01-90 SCHORGER, WILLIAM D ETAL L-90 S-II PEACOCK HILL .28 SM,
73B-01-9l M;R DEVELOPMENl' CORPORATION L-9l S-2 PFACœK HILL .170 8£.1
. 73B-1-92 Piedmont Ca ital Cor L-92 S-2 Peacock HI .17 SM,
73B-01-93 DAVIES, GOOIΠE OR LINDA R L-93 S-2 PEACOCK HILL SM i
3B-01-94 BABARSKY, RICHARD J ETAL L-94 S-2 PEACOCK HILL .170 sM
73B-01-95 BABARSKY, RICHARD J ETAL L-95 S-2 PEACOCK HILL 0.170 SM
73B-01-96 BENDER, TIMOTHY P L-96 8-2 PEACOCK HILL 0.228 SM
73B-1-97 KAUFFMAN JAMES M ErAL L-97 S-2 PEA.CX>CK lITLL 2.240
73B-01-97 MCGUFFEY HILL LTD L-97 S-2 PEACOCK HILL
73B-01-93"MCGUFFEY HILL LTD L-98 S- PEACOCK HILL
73B-2-1 PEACOCK HTIL CXM1. ASSOC. (XH.{)N AREA 1 36.624
3B-02-2· PEAǺ~K HILL COrn~~. ASSOC COMMON AREA 2 .09
73B-02-3 PEACOCK HILL COl1MUN. .ASSOC COMMON AREA 3 4.770
73B-02-4· PEACOCK HILL COMMUN. ASSOC COMMON AREA 4 .140
73B-02-5 PEACOC~HILL cofllimN ASSOC COiiMON AREA 5 .150
73B-02-6 PEACOCK HILL COì~1UN ASSOC CO}n10N A 6 .09
'73:8-02'" P ,]
73&-02.... :Ä~ .,'
¡ 73B-3-l
73B-3-2 KELSH, WHo E. III ETAL L-2,S-3 PEA<DCK HIIL
73B-03-3 STOLER MARK H OR PAULA M L-3 S-3 PEACOCK HILL 1.746 S
73B-3-4 Isaacs Ross L-4 S-3 Peacock HI IIS~~
73B-3-5 ROCKWELL, WILLIAM L & KAREN L L-5 S-3 PEACOCK HILL
73B-3-6 Hunter H Miller L-6 S-3 Peacock HI 1.501 SM
73B-03-7 ZAKIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY L-7 S-3 PEACOCK HILL 1.395 SM
73B-3-8 Zakin Construction Co L-8 8-3 Peacock HI 1.899 SM
73B-03-9 MCGUFFEY HILL LTD L-9 S-3 PEACOCK HILL 1.735 SM
73B-03-10 MCGUFFEY HILL, LTQ L-10 8-3 PEACOCK HILL 1.858 SM
73B-03-11 ZAKIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY L-11 S-3 PEACOCK HILL 1.376
73B-3-12 Gibson, David L-12 8-3 Peacock HI 1.418 SM.
73B-03-13 SCANDORE LINDA L-13 S-3 PEACOCK HILL 1. 8 SM
73B-03-14 RORTY RIHCARD M OR MARY V L-14 S-3 PEACOCK HILL 2.653
73B-07-l DAVIES GEORGE E & ETAL L-1 S-7 PEACCX::K HILL S!v1 .
,73B-07"-lAi'PEACOCK HILL' SE:RVI .
73B-07-2 NIDIFFER, FRANK D JR ETAL L-2 S-VII PEACOCK HILL .83
73B-7-3 Zakin Construction Co L-3 PH-7 Peacock HI .968
73B-07-4 MAHAN 'l'HCMAS J OR JANICE A 1.-4 S-VII PFACOCK HILL SM .
73B-07-5 SMULLEN, RONAlD L OR CAROLYN L-5 S-VII PEACOCK HILL 1.569
7 B-7-6 John A Andrew L-6 PH-7 Peacock HI 1.58 SM
73B 7 7 ZAKIN crION CCMPANY L-7 S VII PEACOCK HILL 8M
·'73B-07-8 HALLlG8N-, rosEMARY D' .. L-8 8-1_ pE'JV:XX:K..
73B-07-9 BASS, G NARTIN OR SUSIE D It-9 8=7 PEACCX:::K HILL
I 73B-07-l0 DE ALARCON PEDK> A OR--ii---HL=i- ·S-=71?E:AcocK HILL
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors ~
. ,---
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County ExecutIve /
August 30, 1995
Dist(~ted kI bld: ¡?-/ -jI'S:
..,. h,.: jfP/¿:1j?¿:?~ bJ? /
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Tax Exempt Status - UV A Properties and Foundations
At your meeting on August 9, 1995, several questions were raised concerning the tax exempt status of University
property and related foundations. State-owned university property is clearly tax exempt as provided for in the
Code of Virginia. The Code does, however, authorize a service charge for faculty and staff housing which, by
formula, is the equivalent of a $0.70 tax rate.
.
The Code also provides that foundations with incomes that are used exclusively for literary, educational or
scientific purposes are tax exempt. It becomes somewhat more complicated in Albemarle County and
Charlottesville in applying these particular code sections since the Three Party Agreement with the University
and the City requires the University Real Estate Foundation to pay taxes in the County and the City for properties
not held for educational or scientific research purposes. UREF and its wholly owned subsidiaries currently pay
such property taxes.
The Health Services Foundation is the other foundation affiliated with the University's Health Sciences Center
that owns property in the County. Again, under state law, it is exempt from paying local taxes. However, HSF
has voluntarily agreed to pay a service charge for the Fontaine property that it currently owns. This service
charge is agreed to be set at the same amount we receive from the University for faculty and staff housing. HSF
is in the process of purchasing several medical offices in the County and it has indicated that it intends to continue
paying taxes or a service charge on those facilities. We will be working out an agreement with HSF on this matter
in the near future.
The taxation status and agreements regarding University property are very complicated, however, I think that the
current arrangements that we have with the University's foundations are favorable to the County considering that
the law would allow them to claim total exemption from local taxation. We recognize that the County benefits
from having these facilities in our community because of the enrichment provided by the University and by the
spin-off of employment opportunities in our region. Likewise, I believe that the University recognizes that the
arrangements we have for providing service charges and taxation on certain property that they hold is fair and
equitable to both entities. We are fortunate that the University and the County have worked out amicable
agreements that acknowledge the need to protect the County's tax base so that the County can continue to provide
the high quality oflocal services to University properties which are important to the University and promote the
best interests of the County. Keep in mind that University communities in other parts of the state do not have
similar arrangements.
.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter prior to our meeting on September 6th, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
RWT,Jr/dbm
95.132
., ~
';7..--/ ..--.?:f)
:?£~f'¿:?¿{" 6/';--
".
;111 'I
I 11 .~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Evaluating Site Review
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
ACTION:
INFORMATION: X
REOUEST:
Up-date on proposed changes to the site review process that have been
implemented or are Wlder consideration by the COWlty development
departments (planning, Zoning, Engineering and Inspections).
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Mr. Tucker, Mr. Huff, Ms. Jose h
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
Consultants, developers, members of the public and stafIhave identified several shortcomings in the current site review process. To address
these, the development departments created a team to examine the existing methods of plan review. The team was detennined to create a
procedure that would be more productive for the departments and the applicant while ensuring that the public remain infonned.
The team identified the following as areas that required change:
· Communication between development departments (Internal Improvements)
Solutions -
· Set up regular site review internal committee sessions -Implemented
· Continue to encourage interactions amongst departments and agencies to Wlderstand the role played within the process -
Implemented
· Respect deadlines for comments requested by other departments - Implemented
Plan Review (External Focus)
Solutions -
· Make the plan/plat checklist reference ordinance sections - Implemented
· Make submission of the checklist mandatory - Implemented
· Reject plans/plats if all the material required is not included in the submission - Implemented
· Indicate if the requirements requested for revision on the plan/plat are for preliminary or fmal approval- Implemented
Limit additional comments (re-review) - Implemented
· Change the Site Review Meeting fonnat - Recommended
DISCUSSION:
Because the Site Review Meeting includes consultants and developers, the team requested that the topic be presented at a Community
Roundtable discussion. The ROWldtable would give the external participants, as well as the interested public, the opportunity to present their
view of the meeting, and offer changes they felt would improve the existing process. The meeting also allowed developers and consultants to
express their frustration with the existing site review meeting. Issues and concerns raised at the meeting included the following:
I) Developers/consultants were not able to respond at the meeting to the comments they were receiving fÌ'om the various agencies,
2) Developers/consultants did not receive the comments before the meeting,
1
Agenda Title: Evaluating Site Review
Setpember 6,1995
Page 2 of2
3) Developers/consultants had to devote their entire morning to the meeting, waiting in line behind other applicants that had been
scheduled earlier on the agenda,
4) Developers/consultants had to attend the mandatory meeting even if there were no issues or conflicts concerning their project.
5) A citizen representative noted that the site review meeting as currently structured allows members of the public to observe the
meetings. Any changes to the meeting procedures should not preclude this opportunity.
The team's response to the concerns expressed are the recommendations outlined below:
I) Site Review Meeting should be discretionary, with attendance determined as needed by the applicant or the staff
2) Site Review Meeting should be a work session between the consultant/developer and staff, in a scheduled appointment for each
submittal, set for a specific time slot.
3) Because the Site Review Meeting would be individually scheduled meetings there is a need to allow for public awareness of the
projects. Possibilities to increase public awareness are under consideration to increase this awareness are attached. (Attachment A)
4) To rewrite the letter sent to the adjacent owner making the letter easier to understand, and make the adjacent owner aware that staff
is available for infonnation. Currently, the letter sent to the adjacent owner does not advise of staff availability and is not infonnative
of the review process. This effort to make the notifying letter more easily understood while helping to clarify the process is clearly
intended to more readily involve members of the public.
95.138
siterev.xsrn
".
.. .
.
.
-
-
A1f¿;{d1f)1~ A
COMMUNICATION PLAN - SITE REVIEW INFORMATION
In order to enhance communication and increase citizen awareness of and input into the site
review process, the following options are being considered:
o Listing on the Albemarle County Internet Home Page
o Regular column in the FYI newsletter
o Posting in the lobby of the County Office Building
o Mailings to interested groups - the media, neighborhood associations, Chamber of
Commerce, etc.
o Messages on the County voicemailline
o The Cable Channel bulletin board
o More information available in the local newspapers
Final decision on these options will necessitate consideration of staff time, costs and legal
implications before implementing.
The goal of the communication plan will be to identify and utilize all appropriate
communications channels to insure that citizens are as informed as possible about site review
projects and that they are aware of their opportunities to review and comment on those
projects.
The county will begin using much larger signs to advertise any legislative act that may be
proposed on a site. This is one of the most visible methods of informing people of activity
proposed on the site. However, this improved posting of signs will advertise proposed
Special Permits, Zoning Map Amendments, and Variances. The signs will not be posted for
site plan applications. The signs are similar in size and shape to real estate sales signs.
·
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
September 8, 1995
Charles S. Martin
R ¡vanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
Mitchell Neuman, Jail Board Chairman
Albemarle/Charlottesville Joint Security Complex
1205 Orchard Drive
Crozet, Virginia 22932
Dear Chairman Neuman:
At its September 6th meeting, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors discussed the Juvenile Detention
Needs Assessment Report, which documents the increasing need for secure detention spáce for Albemarle and
Charlottesville juveniles in the next 20 years. Following the discussion, the Board voted to request that the Jail
Board begin discussions on the feasibilty of incorporating juvenile bed space into the expansion plans for the
Joint Security Complex.
Acknowledging that site limitations, as well as the other legal and practical issues involved in housing adults and
juveniles in the same facility, the cost/benefit of shared kitchen, laundry, security and educational facilities should
at least be analyzed by the community before a separate juvenile detention facility is considered. With that in
mind, we are asking the Jail Board to inititate this discussion with the possibility of utilizing your current
architectural finn to evaluate the feasibilty of the site for such a joint venture.
The state board of the Department of Youth and Family Services will be officially acting on the County and City's
request on October 11, although we do not anticipate any opposition to moving forward with the design and
feasibility study. I have attached a copy of the summary submitted to the Board of Supervisors in addition to a
copy of the full report on the juvenile detention needs assessment.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
LJ CL&-~ +f2~~~
Walter F. Perkins
Chainnan
WFP\
95.026
pc: Mrs. Charlotte Y. Humphris
*
Printed on recycled paper
'¡i ~:"i;K I) ~'; ..!:...-¿=¿"?
>;~(tl i\ffI¡ ;.t~ì:?P.t¥£.¿;~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Secure Juvenile Detention Needs Assessment
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
Di~\riD.~tlil1 'Ii Bowd:
~~:rtWb~trÔN: X
ACTION:
SUBJECfIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Discussion of Juvenile Detention Needs Assessment Report
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
ATTACHMENTS:
STAFF CONTACf(S):
Mr. Tucker, Ms. White
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
Concerned about the increasing nwnber of Albemarle and Charlottesville juveniles being transported and detained at the Shenandoah Valley
Detention Home in Staunton, as well as security concerns at the cWTent facility for the more serious and violent offenders, the County and City
requested assistance:&om the state Department ofY outh and Family Services (DYFS) last December to conduct a study of the cWTent and future
needs for secure detention beds for the two localities. This attached report, which was produced by a team composed of City, County, CACY
Commission, Juvenile Court and DYFS staff, will be submitted to the state Board of DYFS in October for their approval to proceed with a
Program Design and Planning Study.
DISCUSSION:
As you will see in the report, the increasing nwnber and severity of Charlottesville and Albemarle youth offenders are creating capacity, security
and transportation problems at the cWTent Shenandoah Valley Detention Home in Staunton. Charlottesville and Albemarle together make up
approximately 45% of the bed space in a 32 bed facility, with Albemarle admissions increasing 236% over an 11 year time period and the
average daily population (ADP) for Albemarle youth increasing from 1.4 to 3.9 youths over the same time frame. Additional problems cited
in the report are the lack of safe holding cells for the juveniles at the courthouse, the costs and security problems in transporting juveniles back
and forth to Staunton on a regular basis, the lack of security for violent offenders at the CWTent facility, and the lack of post-dispositional
spaces. Post-dispositional placements are often favored by the local judges who would like the option of sentencing a juvenile offender for
a 30 to 180 day local placement, rather than committing the youth to a more pennanent state facility.
Based on current usage and trends, the report concludes that a 65 bed secure detention facility may be needed to address the growing nwnber
of delinquent youth in Albemarle and Charlottesville over the next 20 years. If the state board of the Department of Youth and Family Services
concurs with this assessment, approval will be granted for Albemarle and Charlottesville to proceed with a feasibility/planning study. This study
will provide a detailed analysis of the capital and operational costs for this type of facility and is estimated to cost approximately $10-$20,000,
all of which would be 100010 locally funded by the City and County. If approval is received from the state and both the Board and city Council
agree to fund the study, it should be completed by July of 1996. The design plan would then come back to the Board and City Council for
approval before sending it on to the state for consideration in the State's 1997-98 budget.
Iffimding were approved by the state, construction could begin by July, 1997. Similar to jail construction funding, the state will reimburse the
county and city for 50% of the costs of construction, but only after construction is completed. The state would continue to pay a high of 2/3
of the personnel costs and 100010 of the operational costs to a low of 50.48% of the combined personnel and operation costs. Although the full
budget impact will not be available until the feasibility/design study is completed, estimated costs are provided below:
Local
State
Planning Study($ 1 0,000 - $20,000)
Site Acquisition
Facility Construction(65 beds @ $loo,ooo/bed)
Operational Cost ($25,000 - $30,000/bed or
$1,950,000 annually)
$20,000
?
$3,250,000
$400,000 to
$965,000
$0
?
$3,250,000
$1,550,000 to
$985,000
AGENDA TITLE:
Secure Juvenile Detention Needs Assessment
September 6, 1995
Page 2
Albemarle's share of the local costs would need to be determined as part of the contractual agreement establishing a juvenile facility commission.
Although not included in the official needs assessment study, the counties of Culpeper, Fluvanna and Goochland have expressed a strong interest
in joining with Albemarle and Charlottesville and have participated in several discussions with the assessment team dw-ing the assessment report
process. All three jurisdictions will also be submitting their individual needs assessments to the state board at the same time in October. If
approved. their participation in a joint facility could reduce the local share of the costs to Albemarle and Charlottesville shown above.
RECOMMENDATION:
This report is submitted for the Board's infonnation and does not require any action at this time. However, given the time rrame for the
proposed jail expansion and the need to locate additional secure juvenile detention space in the Charlottesville/Albemarle area, staff
recommends that the Board request the Jail Board to investigate the possibility of designing the jail expansion to include space for juvenile
offenders. Although there are many problems associated with housing juveniles in close proximity to adult offenders, the economies of scale
of sharing kitchen,laundJy, educational and security fimctions seems an option worth pursuing before committing significant funds to a separate
juvenile facility.
95.144
SECURE JUVENILE DETENTION
NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR
THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
AND
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
OF THE 16TH JUDICIAL
DISTRICT
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY COUNCIL ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISOR
David J. Toscano, Mayor
Kay Slaughter, Vice-Mayor
Virginia Daugherty
Alvin Edwards
Thomas Vandever
Walter J. Perkins, Chairman
Charlotte Humphries, Vice-Chair
David Bowerman
Forrest Marshall
Charles Martin
Sally Thomas
CHARLOTTESVILLE STAFF
ALBEMARLE COUNTY STAFF
Jack Gallagher, Social Services/
Community Attention
Linda Peacock, City Manager's Office
Gary O'Connell, Acting City Manager
Jonathon Earl, Albemarle County Police Dept.
Roxanne White, County Executive's Office
Robert Tucker, County Executive
CHARLOTTESVILLE-ALBEMARLE CHILDREN AND YOUTH COMMISSION
Rory Carpenter
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
REGIONAL OFFICE
Jay N. Ziehl, III, Program Manager, Region II
Ralph Thomas, Program Manager, Region II
William R. Bader, Regional Manager
Thaddeus F. Aubry, Jr., Region II Administrator
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGIINIA
DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
16TH JUDICIAL COURT SERVICE UNIT
Judge Edward Berry
Judge Jeanene Shannon
Martha D. Carroll, Court Services Unit Director
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
INTRODUCTION
CHARLOTTESVILLE/ALBEMARLE PROBLEM
ST ATE WIDE DETENTION PROBLEM
CHARLOTTESVILLE/ALBEMARLE
DEMOGRAPIßC DATA
JUVENILE POPULATION STATISTICS
TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS
CHARLOTTESVILLE/ALBEMARLE
INITIATIVES
CONCLUSIONS
PAGE
1
1
3
4
5
10
15
20
LIST OF TABLES
PAGE
TABLE 1: UTILIZATION RATES AT SHENANDOAH V ALLEY JUVENILE
DETENTION HOME 1
TABLE 2: TRANSPORTATION DATA 2
TABLE 3: AT-RISK JUVENILE POPULATION (10-17 YEARS OLD)
5
TABLE 4: PART I JUVENILE ARRESTS (CALENDAR YEAR) 5
TABLE 5: PART II JUVENILE ARRESTS (CALENDAR YEAR) 6
TABLE 6: TOTAL JUVENILE ARRESTS (CALENDAR YEAR) 6
TABLE 7: PRE-DISPOSITIONAL ADMISSIONS TO SECURE DETENTION 7
TABLE 8: AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY IN PRE-DISPOSITIONAL
SECURE DETENTION (FISCAL YEAR) 7
TABLE 9: AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION IN PRE-DISPOSITIONAL
SECURE DETENTION (FISCAL YEAR) 8
TABLE 10: AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION IN SHENANDOAH VALLEY
DETENTION HOME 9
TABLE 11: AVERAGE DAILY JUVENILE POPULATION IN SECURE
DETENTION FACILITIES AWAITING TRIAL IN
CHARLOTTESVILLE AND ALBEMARLE FOR FISCAL YEARS
1985 TO 1994 11
INTRODUCTION
This report represents a collaborative effort on the part of the City of Charlottesville,
Albemarle County, and the Department of Youth and Family Services to determine the current
and future needs for secure detention beds for juveniles in our locality. We have attempted to
outline our existing local needs, review available relevant demographic information, look at
current and projected juvenile population statistics, assess our current usage of and relationship
with the Shenandoah Juvenile Detention Home, examine other relevant juvenile justice trends,
explore what our locality has done to address growing concerns about public safety and secure
facilities, and summarize the potential benefits of building a local detention option and the risks if
we chose not to invest in such a facility.
It is the consensus of our committee that there is an immediate need for more local secure
detention beds. It also seems clear that these needs will only increase as we look at at-risk
population estimates and the anticipated tightening up of juvenile justice practices. We
recommend that our community be given the approval to proceed with a Program Design and
Planning Study where we can begin to further define our options and do a cost analysis that can
give us a more complete picture of anticipated initial and long term local and state financial costs.
We welcome input and feedback on our efforts as we know many other localities are also
exploring solutions to the statewide detention problem. Thank you for your time!
I. CHARLOTTESVILLE/ALBEMARLE PROBLEM
The Shenandoah Valley Juvenile Detention Home,located in Staunton, Virginia is rated at
32 beds. The following localities comprise the Commission which owns and operates this facility:
the Cities of Lexington, Waynesboro, Staunton, Harrisonburg and Charlottesville, and the
Counties of Augusta, Rockingham and Albemarle. Throughout the eighties, this detention home
experienced utilization rates between 50 and 75%, and often served many localities with no
guaranteed space. However, the annual utilization rates for this facility have been creeping up
ITom 88.8% in fiscal 1990 to 99.7% in fiscal 1994 (See TABLE 1). The City of Charlottesville
and the County of Albemarle had a combined average daily population of 13. 1 pre-dispositionally
placed youth in this facility in fiscal 1994, and 1.2 post-dispositionally placed youth, thus
accounting for 44.7% of the bed space during that year, as opposed to 17.8% of the bed space in
1983 when the average daily population of Charlottesville/Albemarle youth was only 5.7 youth
(all pre-dispositional).
Table 1: UTILIZATION RATES AT SHENANDOAH VALLEY JUVENILE DETENTION
HOME
YEAR PERCENT YEAR PERCENT
1995 96.1% 1990 89%
1994 100% 1989 75%
1993 91. 7% 1988 53%
1992 91.5% 1987 52%
1991 91% 1986 50%
-1-
Table 2: ¡TRANSPORTATION DATA I
Total -
Albemarle Albemarle Albemarle Charlottesville Albemarle &
Sheriff Police Detectives Police Charlottesville
People Transported 744
Number of Trips 346 82 12 120 560
Mileage 28,465 6,724 984 9,960 46,133
Mileage Cost $5,977.65 $1,412.04 $206.64 $2,091. 00 $9,687.93
Hours of Transportation 663.25 155.8 22.8 240 1,081.85
Personnel Cost $9,975.28 $2,313.63 $338.58 $4,080.00 $16,717.49
HOLDING CELL LOGISTICS
Three holding cells are located in the basement of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations
District Court. The clerks are the only other staff located on that floor of the Court building.
The Albemarle County Sheriffs Department is responsible for transportation and supervision of
the juveniles awaiting court hearings. However, the Sheriffs department is located in another
County building directly across the street from the courthouse. There is no constant supervision
of the juveniles being held because the deputies are busy providing courtroom security.
The number of cells is not adequate on many court days. It is not unusual for 10 to 15
delinquents to be transported for court often waiting 5 to 7 hours before the docket is completed
and they can be returned to the detention home. Heat and ventilation are inadequate.
The overcrowding, poor ventilation and inadequate supervision combine to create an
atmosphere where physical violence, verbal assaults and property destruction are common
occurrences. Since 1991, there have been three suicide attempts requiring emergency medical
attention. The current environment is ripe for continued problems which puts the localities at
great liability.
-2-
II. STATEWIDE DETENTION PROBLEM
As reported in The Statewide Juvenile Detention Plan. published by the Department of
Youth and Family Services in February, 1994, the first two juvenile detention facilities were
constructed in Roanoke and Richmond in the 1920's. By the end of the 60s, that total had
reached 10. Spurred on by the Department of Corrections' ten-year plan called, Services in the
Seventies, seven additional facilities were built, the last in Fairfax in 1982. That plan had
contemplated that each district court would have a facility within a 50 mile radius.
These seventeen secure detention facilities provided a rated capacity of 532 beds for pre
and post-dispositional use. Some facilities are owned and operated by localities and others by
commissions. Some have guaranteed space agreements with one or more localities and some
serve exclusively one jurisdiction. Many sell surplus bedspaces to those localities which have no
guaranteed space.
Throughout most of the eighties, a surplus of secure detention space existed in most
regions of the state. On a given day, any jurisdiction needing space could find it within a
reasonable proximity, and those localities and commissions with their own facilities rarely found
them at or approaching capacity. This all changed during fiscal year 1989 when the average daily
population of the state's facilities reached 100% for the first time, indicating that there were many
days during that 12-month period when a given detention home was at or exceeded its rated
capacity. At the close of that year, two of the state's four regions (seven of the 17 detention
facilities) had annual utilization rates exceeding 1000/Ó; the Northern Region had a rate of 113%
and the Eastern Region had a rate of 130.3%. In fiscal 1993, the statewide utilization rate had
blossomed to 120% and through the first five months of the current fiscal year, the rate has
averaged 132%. Three of the 17 detention facilities averaged more than 150% of rated design
capacity during that period, and only two detention homes had utilization rates under 100%
(Shenandoah Valley and Highlands).
-3-
.111. CHARLOTTESVILLE/ALBEMARLE DEMOGRAPHIC DATA
The City of Charlottesville and the County of Albemarle have a combined population of
108,381 (68,040 for the county and 40,341 for the city), which comprises 66% of the Region 10
Planning District. While the City's population has increased by only 1.1 % over the past decade,
the population of Albemarle County increased by 22% in the same time period, with 43.9% of
the population residing in the urban area. Population projections from the Virginia Employment
Commission indicate that Albemarle County will experience a 16% growth rate between the year
1990 and 2000 with the total population reaching 79,081 by the year 2000 and 90,148 by the year
2010. The City's population is expected to climb by 1.2% between 1990-2000 for a total
population of 40,817 in the year 2000 and 41,225 by the year 2010.
Of the total 10.8 square miles in the City of Charlottesville, approximately 44% is
residential development, 16% is commercial and industrial, and 22% is either vacant land or park
space. Albemarle County's 740 square miles has a proportionately greater amount of buildable
vacant land in the urban area around Charlottesville, of which 75% is in residential, 5% in
commercial and 20% in office/industrial service land use designations.
According to 1990 Census data, the greatest shifts in population in both Albemarle
County and the City have occurred over the past 10 years in the 25-44 age group with the largest
increase expected to occur in the 45-64 age group in the next twenty year period. In the 5-19 age
category, Charlottesville is projected to increase from 17% to 18% of the population between
1990 and 2000. In the same time period, the 5-19 age group in Albemarle County is projected to
increase from 22% to 23% of the population. In 1990. Charlottesville had 22% of its population
under the age of 19; Albemarle children under the age of 19 comprised 28% of the population.
In family and social conditions for the two jurisdictions, 36% of the households in
Charlottesville consist of married couple families, versus 59% in Albemarle County and 54% for
the region. Female headed households comprise 12.9% of households in Charlottesville,
compared with an 8.6% for Albemarle and 11.1 % for the state. The percentage of poverty level
families in Charlottesville in 1989 (10%) was more than double that in Albemarle County
(4.8%), although the actual number of identified families is approximately the same at 843 and
819 respectively. The increasing number and proportion of poverty level families in the city and
the corresponding decrease in poverty level families in Albemarle County and the surrounding
region, seems to indicate that many poverty level families are relocating from the outlying
counties to the City. In both Albemarle County and Charlottesville, approximately 77% of the
families living in poverty have children under 17 years.
-4-
IV. JUVENILE POPULATION STATISTICS
Table 3: ~T-RISK JUVENILE POPULATION (10-17) I
1990 2000 GROWTH
Albemarle 6,113 9,963 63.0%
Culpeper 3,068 4,040 3 1. 7%
Fluvanna 1,317 1,600 21.5%
GoocWand 1,250 1,517 21.4%
Charlottesville 2,722 3,957 45.4%
Note 1: Source: Virginia Employment Commission and Jay Ziehl, DYFS (01/30/95
JA YZL9).
Note 2: Source: 1990 Census
Table 3 projects growth in the at-risk juvenile population in selected localities of the 16th
District. As shown, by the year 2000, the at-risk juvenile population will increase by
slightly over one-third (36.6%). Albemarle's anticipated growth rate of63% and
Charlottesville's growth rate of 45.4% heavily impact the average. The combined growth
in the at-risk juvenile population in these two localities is projected to be two-thirds of the
growth in the district by the year 2000.
Table 4: I PART I JUVENILE ARRESTS (CALENDAR YEAR) I
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 GROWTH
Albemarle 86 95 110 186 147 185 201 207 228 165.1%
Culpeper 11 21 39 51 45 85 81 173 135 1127.3%
Fluvanna 12 5 3 18 3 7 7 2 3 -75.0%
GoocWand 9 3 2 6 7 1 0 2 1 -88.9%
Charlottesville 215 168 229 122 109 97 109 111 155 -27.9%
Source: From Jay Ziehl, DYFS (01/30/95 JA YZL4&5).
The average number of Part I juvenile arrests in the localities listed in Table 4 increased
by 220% between 1986 and 1994. Part I offenses include criminal homicide, forcible
rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny - theft, motor vehicle theft and arson.
Over the ten year period, Albemarle experienced a consistent annual increase in Part I
arrests. In 1986, Albemarle had 86 juvenile arrests in this category. In 1994, 228 arrests
were reported, an increase of 165% over the ten year period. Conversely, Part I arrests in
Charlottesville dropped ITom a high of 215 in 1986 to a low of 97 in 1991. In 1994 there
were 155 juvenile arrests, which equates to a 27.9% reduction in reported Part I crimes in
Charlottesville over the nine year period.
-5-
Table 5: I PART II JUVENILE ARRESTS (CALENDAR YEAR) ~
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 GROWTH
Albemarle 144 152 240 326 317 276 302 302 311 116.0%
Culpeper 45 22 60 93 43 117 130 260 231 413.3%
Fluvanna 1 1 0 2 8 8 5 2 1 0%
Goochland 6 1 4 9 2 0 3 2 9 50.0%
Charlottesville 260 163 144 168 183 138 117 139 142 -45.4 %
Source: From Jay Ziehl (01/30/95 JA YZU&5).
Part II offenses include all other crime classifications outside those defined as Part I
offenses. The information provided in Table 5 shows that Part II juvenile arrests in the
five localities increased an average of 106.8% between 1986 and 1994. Albemarle
County experienced a 116% increase during this ten year period, while Charlottesville
saw a 45.4% reduction in Part II juvenile arrests.
Table 6: ~OT AL JUVENll..E ARRESTS (CALENDAR YEAR) I
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 GROWTH
Albemarle 230 247 350 512 464 461 503 509 539 134.5%
Culpeper 56 43 99 144 88 202 211 433 366 553.6%
Fluvanna 13 6 3 20 11 15 12 4 4 -69.2%
Goochland 15 4 6 15 9 1 3 4 10 -33.3%
475 331 373 290 292 235 226 250 297 -37.5%
Source: From Jay Ziehl, DYFS (01/30/95 JA YZL4&5).
Table 6 presents the total number of juvenile arrests by locality for the period 1986 to 1994.
Total arrests increased by 109.6% over the ten-year period. Albemarle's total juvenile arrests
grew from 230 in 1986 to 539 in 1994, a 134.5% increase. During the same time,
Charlottesville's total juvenile arrests reduced from 475 in 1986 to 297 in 1994, the equivalent of
a 37.5% decrease.
-6-
Table 7: PRE-DISPOSITIONAL ADMISSIONS TO SECURE
DETENTION
1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 GROWm
Albemarle 30 50 34 32 34 28 46 35 52 79 71 101 236.7%
Culpeper 22 36 33 17 27 23 31 47 54 48 61 57 159.1%
Fluvanna 7 4 9 6 3 3 10 17 11 17 14 3 -57.1%
Goochland 3 5 7 7 3 2 7 10 10 10 II 2 -33.3%
Charlottesville 92 70 66 59 68 53 54 110 159 170 164 198 II5.2%
Source: From Jay Ziehl. DYFS (01/31/95 JA YZL8).
Table 7 shows the pre-dispositional admissions in the 16th District over the past twelve years.
Although the total admissions increased by 134% over the twelve year period or approximately
11.2% a year, the pre-dispositional admissions for Albemarle increased by 237%. Admissions
for Charlottesville were slightly below the growth rate for the district at 115%. In 1994,
Charlottesville and Albemarle made up 83% of all the admissions in the 16th District.
What these statistics do not show are situations, like those which occurred in Culpeper and
Fluvanna, where potentially violent youth were released due to lack of available detention bed
space. There have also been a few instances (as in the case of a Fluvanna County youth) where
violent youth have been placed in open, less secure programs and settings, e.g. the Community
Attention Home, where they put other, less violent youth and staff at risk.
Table 8: AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY (DAYS) IN PRE-DISPOSITIONAL
SECURE DETENTION (FISCAL YEAR)
1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Average
Albemarle 17.1 8.7 12.5 15.6 18 13 12.5 24.9 22.5 15.5 17.7 14.2 16.0
Culpeper 10.1 9.4 13 13.5 15.5 17.7 17.2 14.4 12.7 16 17.5 14.4 14.3
Fluvanna 18.7 28 16.2 27.6 14.5 29 32.2 10.3 9.6 11.8 12.1 6.7 18.1
Goochland 26.7 12.2 22 21.3 16 22.3 12.1 18.2 17.1 10.3 16 13.5 17.3
Charlottesville 16.2 18.3 15.2 22 17.9 15.9 20.6 22.2 22.6 18.5 21.2 16.6 18.9
Source: From Jay Ziehl, DYFS (0 l/31/95 JA YZL 13).
-7-
The average length of stay for those localities shown in Table 8 was 17.8 days in 1983 and 13. 1
days in 1994. The average length of stay for Charlottesville youth over the twelve year period was
18.9 days. For Albemarle County youths, the average length of stay has averaged 16 days, with
minor fluctuations over the twelve-year period.
Table 9: AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION IN PRE-DISPOSITIONAL
SECURE DETENTION (FISCAL YEAR)
1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 GROWTH
Albemarle 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.7 1.1 1.6 2.6 2.9 3.5 3.5 3.9 178.6%
Culpeper 0.6 0.9 1.2 0.6 1.2 1.1 1.5 1.9 1.8 2.1 3.1 2.2 266.7%
Fluvanna 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 -75.0%
Goochland 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.1 -50.0%
Charlottesville 4.3 3.4 2.6 3.5 3.4 2.2 3.2 6.5 9.7 8.4 7.4 9.2 114.0%
Source: From Jay Ziehl, DYFS (01/30/95 JA YZL 7).
Table 9 shows pre-dispositional child care days and average daily population for the 16th District.
Average daily population growth between 1983 and 1994 was 125%, from 8 in 1983 to a high of
15.5 in 1994. For Charlottesville, the average daily population grew from 4.3 in 1983 to 9.2 in
1994, an increase of 114%, with an average population of8 over the last five years. Albemarle's
daily population grew from 1.4 in 1983 to 3.9 in 1994, an increase of 178% over the twelve year
period, with an average daily population over the past five years of 3.3.
-8-
Table 10:
A VERAGE DAILY POPULATION (ADP)
IN SHENANDOAH VALLEY DETENTION HOME
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE AND ALBEMARLE COUNTY
DATE ADP (youth) RANGE (youth)
July, 1993 11.2 5-15
August, 1993 13.7 1 0-19
September, 1993 , 12.6 9-17
October, 1993 14.6 11-19
November, 1993 19.8 12-26
December, 1993 12.8 10-19
January, 1994 13.5 9-16
February, 1994 16.0 14-18
March, 1994 15.8 13-19
April, 1994 14.3 12-17
May, 1994 15.9 13-19
June, 1994 20.8 16-25
July, 1994 14.8 10-24
August, 1994 11.6 8-15
September, 1994 10.6 5-15
October, 1994 11.8 4-18
November, 1994 8.5 4-11
December, 1994 8.7 3-13
January, 1995 14.4 9-21
February, 1995 13.4 1 0-19
20 Month Average 13.7 9.4-18.3
Data Supplied by Department of Youth & Family Services' Research & Planning Unit
-9-
v. TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS
Projecting and planning for future needs of secure juvenile detention facilities is a complex
and demanding task. Since there is no nationally recognized formula or predictive model that can
be relied upon to accurately project future needs, a broad understanding of various factors and
trend indicators must be used to develop an educated estimate. The basic trend to consider for
rate of growth is Average Daily Population per year. This general growth rate can then be added
on to actual daily extremes of usage to get an estimated trend in capacity needs. This trend of
annually estimated daily capacity requirements actually refers to the summary effect of many
underlying and interacting factors and trends. Some of these contributing factors and trends are:
1. The number of juveniles (age 10-17);
2. The qualities of the domestic environment;
3. Neighborhood social characteristics;
4. The behavior of specific juveniles;
5. The family's, victim's, neighbor's/witnesses' response;
6. The police response;
7. 1&0 Court Services response;
8. Availability and response of community/youth/family services;
9. The 1&0 Court judges'response;
10. The availability and qualities of secure detention facilities;
11. The availability and qualities of alternative modes of detention and restriction on
activities;
12. The legislative guidelines and mandates on handling juveniles;
13. F ederallevel activities, legislation, policies and programs;
14. Social; trends in parenting, moral and ethical norms, individual regulation and
accountability, criminal justice, corrections, welfare, housing, health care,
education, family and youth services, cultural and political styles, and many
others.
The influence of some of these trends and factors are considered below, but first basic estimate
and projected needs should be established.
The basic trend of Average Daily Population in secure juvenile detention facilities used by
Charlottesville and Albemarle (CIA) has been generally upward over the years. The numbers for
pre-dispositional detention are presented in Table 9, and are graphed in Table 11.
-10-
AVERAGE DAILY JUVENILE POPULATION IN SECURE
Table 11: DETENTION F ACILlTIES AWAITING TRAIL IN
CHARLOTTESVILLE AND ALBEMARLE FOR FISCAL YEARS
1985 TO 1994
20
c:
o
~ 15
:)
Q.
o
a..
.~10
co
Q
CD
a>
co
....
CD
~
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
Year
This presents a 354% increase over the last ten years, or roughly three and a halftimes as many
juveniles in secure detention awaiting trial on an average daily basis in fiscal 1994 than in fiscal
1985. From calculating a "least squares' trend line on these numbers, the slope or estimated rate
of increase per year is just over 1 (1.05). As a trend, the annual average daily population (ADP)
of pre-dispositionally incarcerated juveniles for C/ A has been increasing by just over one each
year for the last ten years. This rate of increase is for pre-dispositional detention only.
The data rrom Table 11 provide indicators for high usage estimates. The high was 26
youths rrom C/ A placed in a facility with a capacity of 32 and several other dependent juris-
dictions. Facility capacity during the last five years has often been a factor in dispositional
decisions on juvenile offenders.
The other factor to consider in a basic estimate is post dispositional usage and capacity.
As mentioned earlier, the Shenandoah Valley Detention Home does not accommodate post
dispositional placements. The Department of Youth & Family Services could only provide data
for '92, '93 and '94 on post dispositional placements in terms of average daily populations. These
were 1.1, 1.1, and 1.2 respectively for C/ A. Data is not available on high point of usage during
the year, but numbers of admissions are. These were 38 for fiscal '92, 30 for '93, and 43 for '94.
Some of these placements were temporary pending placement in a more permanent or long
term facility. Unavailability has certainly restricted usage. Local secure post dispositional
detention facilities for juvenile offenders would be increasingly utilized by judges for 30 to 180
days placements if available. Capacity for post dispositional placement could range rrom about 5
to 30 youths depending on several factors and trends. A capacity of 5 is a reasonable basic
-11-
estimate. The rate of increase in capacity demands for the facility can only be estimated, although
several factors noted below make a .5 annual increase rate seem minimal.
The basis for a facilities capacity needs projection starts with 30 for pre-dispositional and
5 for post dispositional and increases at a rate of 1.05 per year for pre-dispositional and an
estimated rate of.5 per year for post dispositional. Projections for 2000,2005,2010 and 2015 are
presented below. The projections are based upon 1984 figures.
CHARLOTTESVILLE AND ALBEMARLE JUVENILE SECURE DETENTION
CAPACITY NEEDS ESTIMATES
1994 +
NEED
PREDISPO + POST DISP
INCREASE INCREASE
year 2000
6.3 3.0
30 + 5 + (6 X 1.05) + (6 X .5) = 44.3
11.6 5.5
year 2005 = 30 + 5 + ( II X 1.05) + ( II X .5) = 52.1
16.8 8.0
year2010 =30+5 +(16X1.05)+(16X.5)=59.8
22.1 10.5
year2015 =30+5 +(21 X 1.05)+(21 X.5)= 67.6
TRENDS IN UNDERLYING FACTORS or Why These are Minimal Estimates
* The numbers of juveniles in the at risk age range of 10 to 17 are expected to rise, as
presented in Table 3. Based on figures ITom the Department of Youth and Family Services for
this age group in C/ A, the projection ITom the year 1990 to 2000 for this age group is for
increases ITom 8, 835 to 13,920 or a 57.5% increase.
* Some key qualities of the domestic environment tend to support increased juvenile
delinquency. Trends in percentages of working mothers is a main one. This relates to
supervision, involvement, and availability of the mother ITom infancy on up in terms of the child's
basic emotional sense of belonging, loyalty, basic values, consistency in discipline and
commitment. It also relates to the lack of supervision, involvement, and availability of parents
after school for many children ages II to 17. Other factors are the single parent household,
increasing involvement by parents and children in isolating activities with technology such as t.v.,
video games, computers, music with headsets, etc., and increasing economic stresses on the
household.
* Trends in neighborhood social characteristics are going in many directions. There are
increases in security systems and isolation with one's electronic toys, but there are also many
neighborhood initiatives with people getting involved more socially and locally.
-12-
* The juvenile incarceration figures represent increases both in violent crimes by some
juveniles and chronic involvement in crime by some juveniles. This trend is expected to continue.
* The responses of the people directly involved with delinquent juveniles vary. There
may be a positive trend here depending on peoples' awareness of, familiarity with, and confidence
in the people and services available. That the parent(s) are not successfully influencing the
behavior and activities of the child is often evident by the police and courts being involved.
* The police response has several trends to it. Whether the administrations promote or
discourage active inquiry, pursuit, case development, and arrest of suspected juvenile offenders is
an important factor. A strong indicator here is that the new Charlottesville Chief of Police has
recently re-established a Youth Investigations Section and is reported to have a policy toward
getting the main youth offenders off the streets. The expansion of the Narcotics Units should
increase the arrest of youth offenders as well. Additionally there are a number of factors
involving interaction with components of the criminal justice system that are reported to have
reduced the officer's motivation to arrest and process a juvenile. Some of these factors include:
- beliefs that the offenders too often get off too easily and develop a disrespect
for the system;
- feelings that processing juveniles is too time consuming, especially in the
evening and at night when court services or the parents, if locatable, may be
slow in responding, long waits with juveniles, and the 90 minutes travel
time at a minimum if they are put in detention.
* J&D Court Services are reportedly overworked and understaffed. To deal with the
continually increasing number of court cases, a second Judge was appointed but other Court
Service staff have not been increased proportionally. Among several other limitations, this has
progressively restricted the practice of probationary supervision.
* The CIA area has a good array of family and youth services but a detention center 45
miles away does not promote their involvement. This distance has reportedly affected court
decisions on detention when locally provided services also seemed appropriate.
* The J&D Court Judges must follow legislative guidelines and mandates in their decision
making, but they must also work with the resources and facilities available to them. Legislative
changes and increased and improved resources should influence their decision making
accordingly.
* New, local, juvenile, secure, detention facilities would experience increased use.
Facilities overcrowding has been a problem for four or more years. Current facilities not being
local has also lessened usage. There have also been no local, post dispositional detention
facilities. Judges, Court Services, police, families, family and youth services would all contribute
to increased usage.
-13-
* Iflocal secure juvenile detention facilities were available, they would become an
essential component of the C/ A array of services and methods for handling juvenile offenders.
They would be part of the comprehensive services available for dealing locally with at-risk and
chronic offending youths.
* Legislative changes relative to juvenile offenders are hard to predict but seem likely.
The trend, following other trends, seems likely to be toward greater intervention in the interest of
public safety and corrective actions on the offender. This trend should lead to greater use of
detention facilities, especially if community based and available.
* Federal government influences will be mostly indirect but they are seriously involved in
efforts toward reducing violent crime and developing community oriented policing. As violent,
drug using, larcenous, and destructive youth are ongoing community problems, increasing federal
resources available to local criminal justice agencies, should increase local activities.
* Many general trends and processes are at work that could influence usage of juvenile
detention facilities. An increasing "get tough on crime" way of thinking should have several
effects. Increased imprisonment for violent and repeat offenders should lead to more prison
space, larger corrections budgets, and more single parent households. Handling nonviolent and
first time offenders at the community level should lead to greater expansion and coordination of
local services. Federal "belt-tightening" and cut backs in a wide array of program areas will lead
to social unrest.
In summary, we have several trends that will increase juvenile detention facilities usage.
F or planning purposes, it is difficult to speculate which of these will impact the basic rate of
growth developed above. There are expected to be increases in the number of juvenile offenders
and the seriousness of juvenile offenses, but these trends should already be part of the upward
basis trend. Some of the trends or indicators that are not included in the basis needs projections
include:
* Local facilities, once developed, are going to have increased usage because
they are local and functioning as part of the increasingly integrated community
response to juvenile· offenders.
* Since usage has been restricted/reduced for years due to the limitations of
facilities, facilities usage is going to increase just because the needed facilities
become available.
* The legal environment is changing toward dealing with serious juvenile
offenders more effectively, for public safety. This trend is in its early stages in
terms of legislation and related police and cóurt action. Increases in the
seriousness of handling juvenile offenders is ure to be part of it.
It is highly improbable that we can accurately predict the effects of these and the many
other trends and factors that contribute to the need for secure detention facilities for serious
juvenile offenders in the Charlottesville/Albemarle jurisdictions. We need some reasonable
estimates for planning and development purposes. These are provided above, but should be
considered as minimal. The facility must therefore be designed and built to be easily expandable.
-14-
VI. CHARLOTTESVILLEI ALBEMARLE INITIATIVES
This section attempts to describe local interagency/governmental efforts to develop
programs and services that prevent children from entering the juvenile justice system, divert
them at an early stage of involvement; keep children in their home community, school, and close
to family; avoid the need for detention or incarceration, and effectively address the clinical and
public safety issues involved.
It is hoped that the chronological review that follows demonstrates that our community is
one where active cooperation between local and state governments, private business', agencies,
volunteers, community groups, and strong interagency networks (Charlottesville/Albemarle
interagency Network and Charlottesville/Albemarle Children and Youth Commission) has
resulted in the development of an impressive continuum of private and public outreach and
residential services for juvenile justice youth and their families.
Our review will briefly outline when and how each program began, its purpose and
relationship to these juvenile justice issues, a program description, and the present status.
Pre-1990
The following agencies and governmental bodies have been serving juvenile justice
children for many years and providing and supporting preventive and rehabilitation programs.
Shenandoah Valley Juvenile Detention Home - The Home is a regional facility providing
temporary care and supervision of juvenile offenders detained or sentenced by order of the court.
The Home secures custody of detained and sentenced children and provides medical care,
education, recreation, arts and crafts, and counseling services. Established in 1967 by a
commission comprised of the Cities of Lexington, Harrisonburg, Staunton and Waynesboro, it
was expanded in 1972 to include the City of Charlottesville and the Counties of Albemarle,
Augusta and Rockingham.
16th Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court - Established in the early 70's, a primary goal of
the Court is the diversion of youthful offenders to appropriate community alternatives. Our local
court has been a strong advocate for the needs and rights of juvenile justice children while trying
to insure that each child is held accountable for their actions.
Region Ten Community Services Board - Region Ten provides mental health services to
children and families including psychiatric assessment, individual, group, and family counseling,
substance abuse evaluation and treatment, outreach and home-based counseling services, mental
retardation services, etc. Region Ten has been offering these services to juvenile court children
and their families for many years and recently has expanded its home-based services to avoid the
risk of children needing out of home placements.
-15-
Charlottesville/Albemarle Departments of Social Service - These agencies provide social
services that include child protection, foster care, employment services, financial aid, day care,
independent living training and adoption. These departments have been the recipients of many
juvenile court children as mental health restrictions and juvenile court funding limitations have
necessitated the placement of these children in foster care.
Community Attention - This outreach and residential services program that includes a co-ed
group home offering crisis and long term placements, family group home "treatment foster care"
homes, outreach detention services, and an independent living training program. Funded
cooperatively by the Department of Youth and Family Services (DYFS), Charlottesville and
Albemarle governments, and placement fees, Community Attention programs primarily serve
juvenile justice children and their families. Current capacity is about 80 children.
Charlottesville City Council and the Albemarle Board of Supervisors - These local
governmental bodies provide funding and support for creative and effective community-based
youth programs. They are mentioned here because they have been very supportive of local
efforts to address the problems of juvenile court children, Recently Albemarle County has
increased the Teens Give funding and the Charlottesville City Council recently funded an
alternative school (OAEP) for violent children, a direct attempt to address the needs of these
children and avoid their detention and incarceration.
1990
Charlottesville/Albemarle Interagency Network (CHAIN) - The Charlottesville and
Albemarle Departments of Social Services and Public School Systems, the 16th District Juvenile
Court Service Unit, Region Ten Community Services Board, the Charlottesville/Albemarle
Health Department, and Community Attention determined the need for a more organized method
of collaboration on difficult to serve multi-agency children. Modeled after the Lynchburg
Interagency system, interagency assessment and planning teams were developed to provide an
organized public/private interagency staffing mechanism for multi-agency children that were
having difficulty, and were at risk of incarceration or removal from their home community. This
was a volunteer effort on the part of these agencies and predated the mandated Comprehensive
Services Act Family Assessment and Planning Teams.
Charlottesville/Albemarle Children and Youth Commission (CACY) - Funded cooperatively
by both Charlottesville and Albemarle County and the Department of Youth and Family
Services, CACY helps coordinate interagency efforts to serve children and their families with a
strong emphasis on prevention activities and non-secure community-based alternatives.
Juvenile Court House Arrest Program - House arrest began as an intensive supervision
program .provided by the Court Service Unit at the direction of the Judiciary and funded by
DYFS. Daily contact is maintained and the client is restricted to home, school, or work unless
accompanied by a parent or guardian. The goal of the program is to restrict the delinquent's
accessibility to the community and opportunities for illegal activity while allowing continuance
in worthwhile activities. House arrest remains a viable alternative to detention for appropriate
youth.
-16-
1991
Community Attention's Outreach Detention (OD) Program Expanded - Due to an identified
need for more outreach detention services, Community Attention, as part of a redesign of its
services, expanded its OD program to serve 20 children at a time. Outreach Detention services
involve the monitoring and supervision of juvenile court children (4 to 7 times a week) as an
alternative to secure detention. This program is highly utilized and is an effective alternative that
allows children to be at home, attend their own schools, and yet receive more intensive
supervIsIOn.
Interagency Council/P A TS
The CACY Interagency Council was created in September/1991 to provide a structure for
interagency coordination and collaboration among agencies that provide services to children and
youth in the Charlottesville/Albemarle community. The Council is sponsored and staffed by the
Charlottesville/Albemarle Children and Youth Commission (CACY). The Interagency Council
meets bi-monthly and oversees the activities of 14 issue-specific Program Area Teams (PATS)
and four subcommittees designed to share information, conduct research, avoid duplication and
develop needed programming to include the following issues: juvenile justice, case management,
teen pregnancy prevention, child care, substance abuse prevention, child abuse prevention, child
health, recreation, parenting, home-based services, mentoring, residential care, youth service,
service planning, legislative concerns, needs assessments, agency assessment and
communication. The CACY Commission is funded by the Department of Youth and Family
Services, the County of Albemarle and the City of Charlottesville.
1992
Community Attention's (CA) Teens GIVE Program - Teens GIVE is a community service
program where youth are placed in non-profit service sites where they volunteer from 5 to 20
hours per week while earning school credit and motivational stipends. It was developed to
complement CA's Outreach Detention Program with a more treatment and family centered focus.
The program currently serves 35 children and has been developed through the use oflocal
Community Development Block Grant Funds, volunteers, donations, and fund raising events.
This year the program received a Learn and Serve Grant from the Governor that will allow
further expansion of the program.
1993
ChAIN Child Aide Program - A Comprehensive Services Act Trust Fund Grant program,
administered by Region Ten, was developed to serve children at risk of removal from their
homes and/or local community. A short term intervention program using paraprofessionals,
Child Aides works to supplement the efforts of interagency members and identify and help solve
the problems that are putting the child at risk of needing a more restrictive placement such as
detention, incarceration, or out of community placements.
-17-
ChAIN Family Partners Program - The ChAIN Family Partners Program began in 1993
funded by a grant from the State Trust Fund under the Comprehensive Services Act. The
program is sponsored by Children, Youth and Family Services, a private/non-profit family
service agency. The ChAIN Family Partners Program is a voluntary, early intervention,
home-based resource for families with young children, usually birth to 4, who are at risk for
emotional and behavioral problems. It is designed to encourage positive family interaction
through home-based supportive services and to prevent delinquent behavior that results from
dysfunctional family interaction.
Respite Care Alliance Program - The Respite Care Alliance Program was created in 1993
through a grant from the State Trust Fund under the Comprehensive Services Act. The program
is administered by Children, Youth and Family Services and provides temporary care in a foster
home for children at-risk due to emotional and behavioral problems. The goal of the program is
to prevent family disruption and residential placement through respite care.
1994
Opportunity Alternative Education Program - The Opportunity Alternative Education
Program (OAEP) began in October 1994, in response to the Charlottesville City School's need
for an alternative education program for conduct disordered youth who were disruptive and
unable to learn in the regular school environment. The school was created through a joint effort
between the school, city government and the CACY Interagency Council. The program is
funded by City Council and is designed to provide a positive environment in which students can
achieve personal, academic and vocational success. OAEP teaches social coping skills,
cooperative interaction as well as academic and vocational skills, utilizing personal education
plans for each student. Case management/counseling is provided for students in conjunction
with mandatory parental involvement. Most of the OAEP students have been involved, or are
presently involved with the juvenile justice system. Although the school is new, it has
successfully served approximately 40 youth who were unsuccessful in the regular school
environment.
Partnership Alliance for Lifelong Success (PALS) - PALS is the Mentoring Program Area
Team of the CACY Interagency Council. It was established in February, 1994, to coordinate
efforts of mentoring programs within the Charlottesville/Albemarle community and to increase
the level of well trained and supervised adult volunteer mentors. PALS coordinates the
recruitment, screening and training of volunteer mentors in the Charlottesville/Albemarle
community for 20 member agencies. Many of the youth who benefit from mentors coordinated
through PALS are involved with the juvenile court system. PALS has been recognized at the
state level as an innovative, collaborative project.
1995
Electronic Monitoring - Electronic monitoring is a Court Service Unit program started in 1995
and funded jointly by the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County. The probation staff, in
conjunction with Community Attention's Outreach Detention Program, will provide intensive
supervision of youth who are monitored electronically in lieu of secure detention. This will
replace the house arrest program that has historically been provided by the Court Service Unit.
-18-
YES - (Youth Empowered for Success) is a mentoring program developed by the 16th District
'Court Service Unit for youths under the supervision of the court. The program provides court
youth with supportive adult advisors, or mentors, under the guidance of the court service unit
staff. The mentors are caring adult volunteers who have been trained to serve as positive role
models. They strive to improve social interactions, to develop effective coping strategies and to
empower the youth with skills to both deter further criminal activity and to improve the quality
of their life.
We believe these programs in our community exemplify what enterprising and cooperative
activity on the part of local and state governments, agencies and community volunteers can do to
assess, plan, fund, and implement needed local programs for children, youth, and their families.
This current Detention Study project is another demonstration of such collaboration.
VII. CONCLUSIONS
As stated in our introduction it is our unanimous opinion that our communities need to
seriously explore the construction of a secure detention home in our locality as soon as possible.
The benefits seem to far outweigh the potential costs. This is clearly a problem that is not going
to go away and can only get worse as one looks at the rise in violent juvenile crime and
anticipated increases in the juvenile population over the next twenty years. The current direct
and indirect costs involved in trying to find and purchase detention space outside our home
communities likewise will only increase. The liability and personal safety risks inherent in
our current transportation realities and inadequate and overcrowded secure detention and holding
cells by itself is probably sufficient justification to proceed. The personal and'public safety
concerns involved in the release or misplacement of serious offenders due to no available
detention space can only add to our motivation to act. Less dangerous but just as compelling is
the inability to access treatment and encourage agency and family visitation when children
are placed outside our home community. Likewise, the somewhat hidden indirect costs involved
in transportation; lost worker, police, and family time; and long distance phone contacts,
only add to the extent of our problem. Couple these facts with the current funding availability
and attention this problem is getting on a statewide/national level and it seems we have no time
to waste. Although an overused cliché, this seems like the classic "Pay me now or pay me
MORE later!!" situation.
We urge our funding partners to approve our needs assessment and assist us in doing the
final design planning and cost analysis that can give our community the information necessary
for a final assessment and decision.
-19-
-----, -----------
-----~"------------
~TE ____________~-~ ~~
---------------------------------------
A<DO\ ITlMK>. __ Oç¿;:;rj?¿:/'~ þ'/y:
---7---------------------------________
A<DO\ ITlMN6A£ ~~~~~ - ø~~
--- -- -------------------------
------
DBPERREDUNrIL_____~~~______________
F 0 rro. 3
7/25/86
- /
..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXEC~S~Y
-
AGRNOA TITLR:
Request to amend the Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA)
Jurisdictional Area
AGRNOA DATI<::
September 6, 1995
ITEM NTTMRRR:
ACTION:
x
INFORMATION:
STJR,JECTIPUOPOSA T JRRQTTRST~
Consider holding a public hearing to amend the ACSA
Jurisdictional Area to provide "water only to existing structures"
designation for Clifton, The Country Inn (fax Map 79, Parcels
23B, 23C, 23F)
CON~NT AGRNOA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
A TT ACHMRNTS:
~
I
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Cilimberg
RF.VTRWRD RY:
RACKGROTTND:
TIle applicant makes this request as a result of numerous water quantity and quality problems experienced over the lAst several years (see
Attachment A). The applicant seeks this request "in order to eliminate human health and safety issues associated with the existing water
quantity and quality. " .
DTSCTJSSTON~
.1e Comprehensive Plan, in the Village of Rivanna recommendations, says, "water lines should be sized to serve Ihe Village and S~one
~obinson School only." With the development of Glenmore in the Village, a water line was installed along the Route 250 East comdor
from the UIban Area to Gleomore. Subsequently, the Stone Robinson School received jurisdictional area designation for water and a water
line was constructed to serve the school from the main line on Route 250.
The applicant's property is located in the Rural Areas as designated by the Comprehensive plan. Regarding provision of public utilities,
the Comprehensive Plan is intentionally specific in objective and strategies as to where and under what circumstances public utilities should
be made available (p. 146):
OBJECTIVE: Provide public water and sewer services to the Urban Area and Communities.
...
STRATEGIES: Follow the boundaries of the designated Growth Areas in delineating jurisdictional areas.
Only allow changes in jurisdictional areas outside of designated Growth Area boundaries in cases where the
property is: (1) adjacent to existing lines; and, (2) public health or safety is endangered.
Further, the Comprehensive Plan warns that "such utilities are not to be extended to the Rural Areas as these services can increase
development pressures" (p. 146). This request is being made under the second strategy listed above. Although nql immediately adjacent
to a water line, the property is across Route 729 from the Stone Robinson School. The applicant has documented difficulties experienced
that they believe have made their on-site water supply unreliable in both quantity and quality. They further indicate Ihe well driller and the
Virginia Department of Health have advised the applicant 10 seek public water.
David Hirschman has researched the situation and provided an analysis of options (Attachment B). He concludes Ihat connection to the
pililic water supply line would remedy the problems and that "this option represents the best use of resources to guaranlee a lasting solution
that will protect public health and safety into the future. .
, ~Ì1e Board of Supervisors has been very deliberate in consideration of requests for water service along the 250 Easl corridor so as not to
'Wet a precedent for allowing water service in this area not intended for such service. Two prior requests for water service were made for
commercial properties in this area (BoothIExum (GOCO Oil) and Allen G. Dillard). The Booth/Exum request was bRSed on concerns with
groundwater contamination. The Dillard request was based on a need for fire suppression. Both requests were denied.
~~lr
.' ~ - '" þ ~ -::-". ~-- - - ~... ..:. ;¡.
AGENDA TITLE:
Request to amend the Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) Jurisdictional Area
September 6, 1995
Page 2
~
r
RRCOMMF.NnA TION:
There seems to be evidence in the analysis by Mr. Hirschman that a water quantity and quality problem exists at Clifton and the applicant
has exhausted reasonable options for on-site remedies. As this is an operating restaurant and inn serving the public, staff believes this
circumstance may be distinguishable from others in this area and recommends the Board proceed to public hearing to consider granting
jurisdictional area for water only to existing structures for Clifton, The Country Inn (Tax Map 79, Parcels 23B, 23C, and 23F.
,
...
CLIFTON.EXE
95.142
tHsirlD.>lted ií tJoin:J: ß/-ß?S
~ ~~¿Çd
l
'I
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
;1;1
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
DATE:
August 31, 1995
RE:
Solid Waste Disposal Alternatives
Attached is a report fTom Joyce Engineering, consultants for the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority,
outlining six alternatives for future solid waste disposal. The alternatives are as follows:
· Ivy Landfill- status quo.
· Ivy Landfill - status quo with a 35% reduction in municipal solid waste due to the proposed
BFI Transfer Station at Zion's Crossroad.
· Municipal solid waste transfer station at Ivy Landfill.
· Composting municipal solid waste.
· Waste to refuse derived fuel (RDF).
· Waste to energy with ash disposal at the Ivy Landfill.
At its meeting on August 28th, the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority authorized the creation of a solid
waste task force to review these alternatives and any other alternative that might be viable for
handling solid waste in the Charlottesville/Albemarle area. The suggested makeup of the task force
is to have three citizen members appointed by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, three
citizen members appointed by the Charlottesville City Council and three citizen members appointed
by the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority. This task force would be given a basic charge of analyzing
more definitively these and other alternatives and make recommendation in terms of priority for
consideration by the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority and the City and County. Appointment of
members to the task force should be accomplished as soon as possible.
In addition to the establishment ofa task force, the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority also withdrew the
master plan currently under consideration by the Albemarle County Planning Commission. A site plan
outlining improvements around the convenience area, i.e., blue bag drop off, citizen convenience area,
pilot compost area, household hazardous waste drop off area, etc.; will be submitted to the County
,J
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
August 31, 1995
RE: Solid Waste Disposal Alternatives
Page 2
Department of Planning and Community Develop Department for approval as a phase I of the Ivy
Landfill site plan. The remaining areas of the new cell construction and height expansion will not be
a part of any site plan before the Planning Commission at this time. Any future master plan will await
the recommendation(s) regarding waste disposal alternatives.
Finally, our County Attorney's Office has reviewed the risks and responsibilities from the County's
perspective on the matter of the landfill. Their review included evaluating the reports and data
pertaining to the current conditions at the landfill, the State's and County's role in the regulation and
management of solid waste, applicable state and federal laws, and other factors that may have a
bearing on the potential liability of the County. Based on analysis of current law and presently known
facts, it is their opinion that the county has no present liability arising from the operation of the Ivy
Landfill.
RWT,Jr/dbm
95.137
Attachment
... .).---'-----
~ --- --
-. ...IIIL _
... -. .
~ -
_NGtrfJ_ ~
5.L
a
J
Mr. Arthur Petrini, Executive Director
Rivanna Solid Waste Authority
P.O. Box 979
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-2976
Joyce Engineering. Inc.
4808 Radford Ave.
Richmond. Virginia 23230
Tel (804) 355-4520
Fax (804) 355-4282
24 August 1995
Subject:
Preliminary Cost Comparison of Waste Disposal Alternatives
Rivanna Solid Waste Authority
JEI Project No. 206.001 Task 12
Dear Mr. Petrini:
This report presents a preliminary cost comparison of several waste disposal alternatives for
the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority. This report is intended as an initial evaluation for
planning purposes so that the more feasible alternatives can be selected and further
evaluated. The alternatives that were compared include the following:
1 - Ivy landfill using the current waste stream (this is the status quo which is intended as a
baseline for comparison); this alternative is valid for an elevation up to 800 feet,
2 - Ivy Landfill using a 35% reduction in Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) which is intended
to reflect the loss of waste to the proposed BFI transfer station at Zion Cross Roads,
this alternative is valid for an elevation up to 800 feet
3 - MSW transfer station at the Ivy Landfill (all other disposal, e.g. CDD, will be continued
at the Ivy Landfill with 35% reduction in MSW);
4 - Waste to Compost (with staged implementation); this scenario will only reduce the waste
produced (with 35 % reduction in MSW);
5 - Waste to RDF (with staged implementation); this scenario will only reduce the waste
produced (with 35% reduction in MSW);
6 - Waste to Energy with ash disposal at the Ivy Landfill (with 35% reduction in MSW).
These alternatives and the results presented in this report are based on a specific set of
assumptions selected so that a more accurate comparison can be made. These assumptions
include the cost of groundwater remediation which is estimated at $4,000,000.00 but may
vary by as much as 100%, that BFI will open within the next year and divert 35% of the
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) from all the options except the baseline land filling options,
that the tipping fees will hold constant over the analysis period ($38.00 for MSW, $22.00 for
CDD, and $21.00 for Yard Waste),and that the waste streams will increase with the
population at 15% annually. These assumptions were selected as a reasonable scenario
based on the information available at this time. However, anyone of these assumption may
change due to the fluid nature of the solid waste industry at this time. Therefore, these
results should be considered a starting point for an in depth evaluation of alternatives if that
is the direction that the Board decides to choose.
A cost comparison was completed for each alternative and are attached to this report. The
c.
cost analysis compares projected revenue to projected expenditures. The revenue is based
on the current tipping fee schedule of $38.00 for MSW. $22.00 for CDD and $21.00 for Yard
Waste. and includes additional revenue of approximately $50.000.00 annually. These current
tipping fees are held constant over the analysis report. The waste streams are calculated
to increase with the population at a rate of 1.5% per year.
The projected expenditures include line items for capital improvements. operation costs. off-
site disposal costs. where applicable. and post closure care costs also where applicable. The
capital improvements included closure construction. new MSW and CDD cell development
(including a raincover for the waste where applicable). groundwater monitoring and
remediation. leachate management. air quality controls. general facility improvements
(including stormwater control upgrades) and permitting. The groundwater remediation costs
have been estimated to be approximately $4.000.000 regardless of whether the landfill is
utilized or an off-site disposal site is used. It should be emphasized that this is only an
estimate and as conditions are uncovered this estimate may vary. It may vary by as much
as 100%.
A summary of the results are tabulated showing the amount of reserve at the end of a 10
year analysis period. It was assumed that a reserve of $9.000.000 is currently available.
Alternative Projected Capital Operating Off-Site Total Net Reserve
Revenue Improve- Expendi- Disposal E xpendi- at End of
ments tures Costs tures FY06
I-Status Quo $55,945.593 . $26,774,000 $24.576,794 $0 $51,350,794 $13.594,799
Landfill
2-Landfill $39,342,027 $24,134,000 $24.576,794 $0 $48,710,794 ($368,766)
35%
Reduction
3-MSW $39,342,027 $16,244,000 $24.576,794 $33,012,130 $74,053,387 ($25,711,359)
Transfer
Station at
Landfill'"
4-Waste to $39,342,027 $27,614,000 $24.576,794 $0 $52,190,794 ($3,848,766)
Compost'"
5-RDF'" $40,292,027 $28,214,000 $32,368,156 $0 $60,058,156 ($11,290,129)
6-Waste to $58,830,622 $46,634,000 $53,088,673 $0 $97.742,604 ($29,911,982)
Energy'"
* 35% reduction in MSW
Based on these results the best solution based solely on economic issues is to continue
landfilling with the current waste stream. However. since BFI appear to have broken
ground at their Zions CrossRoads Facility it should be assumed that the MSW stream will
be reduced by at least 35%. Continued operations of the Ivy Landfill with a reduced waste
stream is still viable. Although. an increase in the tipping fee may be needed to increase
revenue. However. increasing the tipping fees may have the opposite effect from that
desired depending on the tipping fees at the Zions CrossRoads facility. because an increased
tipping fee at the Ivy Landfill may drive more of the waste to BFI resulting in less revenue.
\0
....
..
A decrease in the tipping fee may attract more waste to the Ivy Landfill resulting in more
revenue. This illustrates that it will be necessary for the Authority to compete in the open
market.
The remediation costs along with the closure costs far exceed the current reserve. This
results in the conclusion that the Authority can not afford to give up revenue to a third party
at this time (in off-site disposal costs) and that disposal at the landfill is necessary to
produce revenue so that closure and remediation can be performed.
The Waste to Compost and RDF alternatives will reduce the waste stream however, residual
waste will still need to be landfilled. These residual wastes are planned to be disposed of
at the Ivy Landfill and can be expected to be on the order of 40% to 60% of the current
waste stream. Additionally, the lack of flow control makes these technologies vulnerable
to a third party undercutting the tipping fee and attracting the waste stream away. This can
be very difficult for the Authority to absorb with a large capital expense for the equipment
and the operational expenses for the personnel to operate these technologies. These
technologies may be better utilized on a small scale with a small capital investment and
possibly operated by the current landfill personnel. It should be noted that a small scale
pilot waste to compost system is planned to be started later this year at the Ivy Landfill.
This is a good start to reduce the waste stream and conserve the current landfill space.
The waste to energy alternative is a very large investment and very risky with no flow
control. Most waste to energy equipment manufactures indicated that a minimum of 600
tons! day (Ivy is currently receiving less that 400 tons! day) was needed to make the
operations fmancially viable. Additionally, the ash will need to be landfilled which will
likely require use of the landfill and the construction of an ash monofill cell.
Reduction in the portion of the waste stream that is disposed of in the landf1l1 helps to
conserve the landfill life, and postpone large expenditures for new cell development and
closures. This may make it possible to be able to leave the landfill for another technology
once the remediation work is completed and closure funds are allocated. This makes small
scale waste stream reduction technology attractive since it lends itself to waste disposal
reductions at a small cost.
The environmental risk is the largest risk for continued operations at the landfill. However,
it should be recognized that this liability has already been accepted by the Authority
regardless of the alternative used. If continued operations of the landfill is selected,
measures such as raincover, leachate trenches and intermediate liner systems should be used
to minimize additional impact to the ground water and surface water.
The control of the incoming waste stream and the markets for the end product are the
biggest risks for the Waste to Compost, RDF and Waste to Energy alternatives. The
potential loss of a substantial amount of the incoming waste can make these large
investments questionable since they are based on receiving a certain size waste stream.
Lack of flow control further makes the stability of the waste stream questionable. The
stability of the market for the end products (compost, fuel in the RDF system and
electricity) of these alternatives are also critical. Additional revenue is expected to make
these alternatives financially viable. Additionally, surplus materials that can not be sold may
need to be landfilled.
Again, this brief report is intended to be a starting point for making a decision about what
alternatives should be further studied. Further details and variations on these alternatives
are planned to be presented at the upcoming Rivanna Board Meeting.
. neering, Inc
~.
John Robins
Project Manager
Attachments
IVY ,g95 Budpel (HIlliS
-
FY 04 FY 05
I
06
FY
03
FY
FY 02
I
01
FY
FY 00
FY 99
FY 97 j FY 98
i
¡
i
í
1
I
5900,000.00
5g0,000.00
í
53,000,000.00
5320,000.00
5 1 ,500,000.00
5175,000.00
5250,000.00
55,000.00
53,200,000.00
5360,000.00
53,200,000.00
5360,000.00
53,200,000.00
5360,000.00
I
¡
52,000,000.00
5200,000.00
51,000,000.00
5120,000.00
f
51,000,000.00
5100,000.00
5500,000.00
575,000.00
52,.00,000.00
52.0,000.00
5800,000.00
5120,000.00
: I
C ¡
L 1
I I
¡- i
5800,000.00 t- 52,.00,000.00 f
5120,000.00 52.0,000.00 I
ï
1
ï
1
I
i
[
¡
i
i
í
i
i
i
!
r
i
í
i
i
5300,000.00
. 55,000.00
5100,000.00
511,000.00
5825,000.00
525,000.00
5600,000.00
5375,000.00
5150,000.00
;¡
I
i
[
I
!
i
I
52,.00,000.00
52.0,000.00
5800,000.00
5120,000.00
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
510,000.00
51,000.00
575.õõo.õö
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
UOO,OOO.OO
550,000.00
5250,000.00
525,000.00
555,000.00
5200,000.00
555,000.00
525,000.00
525,000.00
525,000.00
525,000.00
51,050,000.00
5125,000.00
595,000.00
55,000.00
50.00
50.00
5200,000.00
5' 00,000.00
5320,000.00
I
510000.00 510,000.00
51,000.00 51 ,000.00
575 000.00 575,000.00
550,000.00 550,000.00
550,000.00 550,000.00
52,000.00 ~,OOO.OO
- I
7 1
I
i
I
¡
i
51,500,000.00
5650,000.00
5.50,000.00
522,000.00
5300,000.00
575,000_00
5600,000.00
575,000.00
5500,000.00
S25.õõD.õö
5100,000.00
525,000.00
5100,000.00
525,000.00
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
520,000.00
52,883,000.00
5151,000.00
520,000.00
520.000.00
520,000.00
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
I
I
I
I
550,000.00 I
550,000.00 i
I
52,000.00 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
!
I
I
I
I
$25,000.00 I
ì
I
55,000.00 i
I
55,000.00 I
!
-
-
520,000.00
i
i
1
i
ï
510,000.00 ï
T
on
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00 !
I
I
I
I
I
I
550,000.00 I
550,000.00 I
l
52,000.00 :
I
!
i
I
i
i
i
510,000.00 I
I
51,000.00 I
575,000.00 I
I
I
I
I
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
I
i
t
i
0,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
5200,000.00
5250,000.00
5100,000.00
51,000,000.00
5100,000.00
1
5
IVY 1 Q9S Budge! ~ ,-8/95
FY 95 I FY 96
5900,000.00
590,000.00
5250,000.00
55,000.00
5300,000.00
55.000.00
Quo
&2
Status
1
Option
3
Cell
& Part of
Cunen1
Cel13
Part 0
New MSW Cell Construction
Raincover over Current Cell
Construction
EnoineerinwCOA
CeA . (MSW) Consb'uction
Construction
EngineerinolCCA
Cea 5 (MSW) Construction
Construction
EnoineerinG'COA
Cell 6 (MSW) Consb'ucti
Construction
EnQineerinotCOA
. and
Cell
51,000.00
575.õõo.õö
525,000.00
5.00,000.00
5125,000.00
550,000.00
5500,000.00
5100,000.00
cee Cell UI'grading (Raincoverl
Construction
~
O&M
Groundwater
Annual Report (Engineering)
,\n.esament ÞO.4onitorina (Enoineering & lab'
PlII'mit Amendmen1 (Engineering)
R.,. and Ex1.n1 Studies (Engineering)
Assessment of Corrective Action (Enomeerina\
Corrective Action Plan (Engineerino)
Construction of CA Measur"
Coretructton
EnoineerinWLaboralorv
Remediation O&M
55,000.00
55,000.00
525,000.00
525,000.00
525,000.00
525,000.00
55,000.00
55.000.00
t
520,000.00
51,163,000.00
5271,000.00
520,000.00 520,000.00
51.363,000.00 52,"3.000.00
5151.000.00 .REF!
520,000.00
52,000.00
-
-
-
-
- I
I
5500,000.00 I
525,000.00 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.00,000.00 I
I
525,000.00 I
i
I
I
55,000.00 I
55.000.00 I
i
I
5750,000.00 I
595,000.00 I
,
I
I
I
5100,000.00 I
S60,OOO.00 :
55,000.00
55,000.00
52,000.00
5300,000.00
575,000.00
5600,000.00
575,000.00
5100,000.00
525.000.00
5100,000.00
525.000.00
550,000.00
525,000.00
55,000.00
5200,000.00
55.000.00
5300,000.00
530,000.00
5g5,000.00
55,000.00
586.000.00
S200.000.00
580.000.00
~ 55.20g.000.00
~O_OO__ $1,381,000.00
Leachate Management
Ouarlerty Sampling ond Ana"'sis
R.medial Work on CDD area {trenches
Construction
EnginHrino
Remedial Work on MSW unlined ar81 (trenches
Construction
Enoineerina
l..chate T Ink
Construction
Enoineering
leachate Pump station (CDD)
Construction
Engineerino
leachate Pump station (MSWI
Construction
Engineering
Leacha1. Treatment System
Construction
Enoineering
Leacha1e Treament O&M
Air Quality
Initial Air QUllity Permit
Annuli T 8stino
Collection Measures
Collection O&M
55,000.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
Closure Construction
Phas. II Construction fCel1s 1
Construction
Engineerino'COA
Ph... III Construction
Construction
EngineerinWCQA
Phase IV Construc1îon
Construction
EngineerinQlCOA
55,000.00
55,000.00
,
55,000.00
55,000.00
Facility Improvements
Slonnwl1e, Control
Construction
Enaineering
OfftCe and Parking
Construction
Engineering
Citizen Convience Cenler
Cons1ruc1ion
Engineering
OfftCe Building Addition at the Moore's Creek
Engineering)
(
Tasks
licalion
ConsuhinQ
Permiting
Site Plan
Pan B J.
General
OPTibIJ (A-")
'5-rA'Tù.s QuO
526.688,000.00
5..111.000.00
63,000.00
51.000.00
51,1
5
51,343.000.00
5151.000.00
8.000.00
000.00
5
58
$
52,883,000.00
$391.000.00
52.883,000.00
$151,000.00
I
5. ,623,000.00
$1.0' 1.000.00
laboralory and ConS1ruction Testin
TOTAL
T01al of Enoineerinn
-8195
P9S Budoet
IVY
-8195
995 Budge
IVY
06
FY
05
FY
04
FY
FY 03
02
FY
01
FY
00
FY
FY 99
98
FY
97
FY
96
FY
95
10000
1.50%
10000
FY
434533
29574
27659
25773
23914
22083
20279
11850
6750
115025
3325
650
1
11000
1.50%
11000
43453
2957
2766
2577
239
2208
2028
11850
11675
502
11332
65
1
8500
1.50%
8500
Stream
Waste
0850
001
9865
97
9575
9434
9294
9157
9022
8888
538.00
522.00
521.00
8757
538.00
522.00
521.00
8628
538.00
522.00
521.00
538.00
522.00
521.00
Tipping Fees
MSW
~
Wood Wast.
538.00
522.00
521.00
538.00
522.00
521.00
538.00
522.00
521.00
538.00
522.00
rn:õõ
538.00
522.00
521.00
538.00
522.00
521.00
538.00
522.00
521.00
538.00
522.00
521.00
550,332.263.78
52,913.973.17
52,149,356.24
5550.000.00
555.945,593:18
54,923.826.56
5285,063.64
5210.263.89
550,000.00
55,469,154.09
54.851.060.65
5280.850.88
5207,156.54
550.000.00
55,389,068.07
54,779,370.10
5276,700.37
5204.095.11
550.000.00
55,310.165.58
54,708.739.01
5272,611.21
5201,078.93
550.000.00
55.232,429.14
526.556.863.10
52,461 ,966.92
50.00
50.00
52,413.693.06
52 ,366.365. 75
50.00
52,319,966.42
50.00
54.639,151.74
5268.582.47
5198,107.32
550.000.00
55,155,841.52
54.570,592.84
5264.613.27
5195,179.62
550,000.00
55,080,385.74
54.503,047.14
5260,702.73
5192,295.19
550,000.00
55,006.045.06
,
54.436.499.64
5256,849.98
5189.453.39
550,000.00
54,932,803.0
54,370,935.61
5253,054.17
5186,653.59
550.000.00
54,860,643.36
54.306.340.50
5249,314.45
5183.895.16
550,000.00
54,789,550.
54,242.700.00
5245.630.00
5181,177.50
550.000.00
54,719.507.50
86,156.17
52
43.290.36
50.00
52
265.06
50.00
50.00
01
52
52,060.063.79
52,019.670.38
50.00
0.00%
52.274,476.88
52,229.879.30
50.00
50.00
50.00
Projected Revenue
MSW Roy_.
COD Roy_.
Wood Was,. Revenue
Other RBYenu.
Total Revenue
,.'tons Costs
Projected
Base"'" C
Percentaa
Totol 0
I 50.00
(53.392,879.30)1 (55,157.476.88)! (53.137,966.42) (53,709,365.75) (53,576,693.06) (55,344,966.92) I (551,350,794.10)1
I I I
51,687.506.44 I (51,635.36)1 52,094.462.73 51.600,799.83 51,812.375.00 5124,187.161
I I
56,277,103.28 I 57.964,609.72 1 57.962.974.36 510.057,437.09 511,658.236.92 513,470.611.931
57,964,609.72 I 57,962.974.36 I 510.057.437.09 511.658.236.92 513,470.611.93 513,594,799.09 I
I I I
, ! I
¡ I !
FY 01 I FY 02 i FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 !
55080.385.74 I 55.155.841.52 : 55 232 429.14 55.310,165.58 55.389.068.07 55,469 154.09 I 555.945.593. H
53:392.879.30) I 55157,476.88\! 153.137 966.42 1$3.709.365.75 53,576 693.06 55,344.966.921 I 1551.350.794.10)
57.964.609.72J 57,962,974.36 ¡ 510.057.437.09 511.658.236.92 513,470,611.93 513,594,799.09 L
J I I
; L
,
ï !
I
~ I
i
¡
~
J.
I
T
ï
I
T
.L
1
I
T
~
-
[
ï
[
-
,.
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
51,363,000.00·
50.00
50.00
526.774.000.00
000.00
52.883
63,000.00
51
51,343.000.00
5818,000.00
52,883.000.00
63.000.00
51
000.00
(57.228,670.38)1 (56.683,063.79) I (54,984,265.06>1 (53,506,290.36) 1 (54.629,156.17)
50.00 I (52,509,162.88 151,893,513.68) (5123,621.70) 51,426.512.65 5376,888.89
-
- 59,000,000.00 56.490,837.12 54,597,323.44 54,473,701.75 55,900,214.40
- 56.490,837.12 54,597,323.44 54,473,701.75 55,900,214.40 56,277,103.28
-
-
FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00
50.00 54.719,507.50 54,789.550.11 54.860,643.36 54,932.803.01 55,006,045.06
50.00 57.228,670.38 56,683,063.79 54,984.265.06 53,506.290.36 54,629,156.17
50.00 56.490,837.12 $4.597.323.44 54,473.701.75 55,900.214.40 56,277,103.28
52,443
52,883.000.00
54.623,000.00
55,209,000.00
50.00
(Rev-Exps)
roY.menta
OperatinJl Budget
Fo< Tho Cho~
FY
Poa. Ctoaur. Car.
Total Expenditures
Starting Reserve
Reserve at End of
1m
T etal Revenue
Total ExDenditu,..
Reserve at End of FY
110'
Co
Net
---- Total Revenue
---0-- Total Expenditur..
-- Reserve al End 0' FY
!
I
L'
\
~\' '"
>- co
; \~
\
515,000.000.00
510,000,000.00
55,000.000.00
...
co
>
...
50.00
55,000.000.00)
510.000,000.00)
OPTi ü ~ ( Ó ')
S"""CAT·-'.} Q0Q
.
(2-81V5
P95 Budget
IVY
12-8/95
995 Budget
IVY
FY 04
03
FY
I
02
FY
01
FY
FY 00
!
I
FY 99
98
FY
97
FY
96
FY
95
FY
Reduction of 35% in MSW
i
i
06
FY
05
FY
1
&2
5900,000.00
590.000.00
I
5900,000.00
590,000.00
3
& PO" of Cell
CUrTent
53,000.000.00
5320,000.00
52,000,000.00
5200.000.00
51,000,000.00
5120.000.00
Closure Construction
Phlse II Construction (Cells ,
Construction
EnoineerinolCOA
Phase 111- Construction
Construction
EngineerinGlCCA
Phase IV Construction
Construction
EnoineeringfCOA
O¡>lion 2
51,500,000.00
5175,000.00
51.000,000.00
5100,000.00
5500,000.00
575,000.00
I
I
Coli 3
~ and Pan 0
5250,000.00
55,000.00
53.200,000.00
5360.000.00
53,200,000.00
5360,000.00
I
52.400,000.00
5240,000.00
5800,000.00
5120.000.00
I
i
5800,000.00
5120,000.00
5800.000.00
5120.000.00
I
;7
I
5300.000.00
. 55,000.00
5100.000.00
I
1
I
I"
510,000.00 I
[
511.000.00
$825,000.00
525.000.00
5600,000.00
5375.000.00
5150,000.00
i
510,000.00
51,000.00
575.õõõ:õõ
I
[
I
52,400,000.00
5240,000.00
I
I
I
i
510.000.00
51,000.00
575.000.00
5800,000.00
5120.000.00
I
¡
I
5250,000.00
55,000.00
510,000.00
51,000.00
575.000.00
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
510,000.00
51.000.00
575,000.00
510,000.00
000.00
000.00
51
575
510,000.00
51.000.00
575.000.00
I
i
i
51,000.00
575,000.00
New MSW Cell Construction
Raiocover over Current C&l1
Construction
Enoineering/COA
c.u .. (MSW) Construction
Construction
EnoinHrinalCQA
Cell 5 (MSW) Construction
Construction
Enginaerinc¡lCOA
een 6 (MSW) Construction
Construction
EnoineerinQlCOA
Call
5300,000.00
55,000.00
CDD Cell Upgrading (Raincover)
Construction
~neerina
O&M
510,000.00
51.000.00
575,000.00
5200.000.00
5250.000.00
5100.000.00
51,000.00
575.000.00
525.000.00
5400.000.00
5125.000.00
550,000.00
Groundwater
Annual Report fEnainHring)
Asses.mana Monitoring (Enoineering & Lib'
Permit Amendment fEnoineerina)
Rite and Extent Studies (Enoineering)
Assasament of CorflÞcti.... Action (Eni .
Corrective Action Pian CEnøjnHrino)
Construction of CA Measures
Construction
EnoineerinaILaboratorv
Rame6ation O&M
I
51.500,000.00
5650.000.00
5450,000.00
I
I
51,000,000.00
5100,000.00
5500,000.00
5100.000.00
522,000.00
I
550,000.00
550,000.00
52.000.00
5300,000.00
575,000.00
,
5300,000.00
575.000.00
5600,000.00
575.000.00
i
I
5600,000.00
575.000.00
5500,000.00
525.000.00
I
i
j
,
I
[
i
5500,000.00
525,000.00
5100.000.00
525,000.00
5100,000.00
š25.õõõ:õõ
5400,000.00
550,000.00
5250,000.00
525.000.00
555,000.00
5200.000.00
555,000.00
I
i
I
.
I
I
j
:
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
525,000.00
55,000.00
5400,000.00
5100.000.00
525.000.00
550,000.00
550.000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
525,000.00
55,000.00
55.000.00
Leachate Management
Ouar1ertv SampJino and AnatvsÎl
Ramecbl Work on COO area (trenches
Construction
Enoineerino
Ram~.1 Work on MSW unlined .r.. (trenches
Construction
Enoineerino
leachatl Tank
Construction
Enoineerino
LNChat. Pump slation (COO)
Construcöon
Enoineerina
leachate Pump station (MSWJ
Construction
Enoineerino
leachate T,..tmenl System
Construction
Enoineerina
leachate Treamenl O&M
550,000.00
550.000.00
52,000.00
S50.000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
550.000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
550,000.00
550,000.00
52.000.00
I
I
I
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
525,000.00
55,000.00
55.000.00
525.000.00
55.000.00
55,000.00
51,050,000.00
5125.000.00
595.000.00
S5.õõõ.õõ
525,000.00 1
I
_,
55.000.00
55,000.00 r
1
i
I
f
55,000.00
-I
50.00
50.00
5200,000.00
5100,000.00
5320.000.00
55,000.00
T
t
i
i
I
525,000.00
55.000.00
525.000.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
.
i
I
55.000.00 I
1
55.000.00 I
T
i
525,000.00
I
52,000.00
52.000.00
5100.000.00
525.000.00
525,000.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
525,000.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
525.000.00
55.000.00
5200.000.00
55,000.00
Air Quality
lnitiallûr Quality Permit
Annual T .sting
Collection Measures
CollOc1ion 0& M
5750.000.00
595,000.00
S300.000.00
530,000.00
595.000.00
55.000.00
Facility Improvements
S1ormwa1., Control
Construction
Engineerina
OffICI and Parking
Construction
Engineering
Citi2en Convience Cenler
Construction
Enaineering
Otftee Building Addition al the Moore'
586.000.00
Cree"
Engineering)
Permiting Tasks
Site Pbin
Part B Application
General Consulting
5200,000.00
520,000.00
520,000.00
520.000.00
520.000.00
5~
63.000.00
520.000.00
52."3,000.00
520,000.00
520,000.00
52.883.000.00
520.000.00
51,163,000.00
5100,000.00
560.000.00
580.000.00
Off¡ Or-) z..( Aì
3 S<¿'O P~Dvc.1ï 0;.1
524,048,000.00
!
63,000.00
.'
51
343.000.00
51
5818.000.00
52.883.000.00
51
5 I .363.000.00
53.703.000.00
55.209.000.00
50.00
TOTAL
50.00 51.381.000.00 5'.011.000.00 5'51.000, 5,51.000.00 54."'.000.00
- -
- -
- --
- FY 97 FY 98 I
FY 95 FY 96 FY 06
- I
- I
"0000 - I
1.50% 73! 82896 i
110000 ",650 72500 997591
I
11000 -
1.50% ~6 I
"000 " 165 " 332 '2957: 143453
-.:: I
8500 -- I
-- 1
1.50% I
8500 8628 87571 --eï- 10013' 110850
I -2 I
-- I
----:.-
538.00 538.00 538.00 ~- $38.00 i
522.00 522.00 522.00 -lli.:J 522.00 i
521.00 521.00 521.00 ----.illJ- $21.00
-- !
-- I
$4.242 700.00 52 755.000.00 I 52.796.325.\ 53.150.039.38 I $33 728 698.20
$245 630.00 52493'4.45 5253.054 .. 5285 063.64 I 52.913 973.17
$181 177.50 5183.895.16 5186.653.. 52'0263.89 52 "49.356.24
$50 000.00 $50.000.00 550.000.\ $50.000.00 5550.000.00
$4.719.507.50 $3.231.209.61 $3.286,032. : 53.695.366.91 $39.342.027.60
I
I
51.980,069.00
2.00% I
~1 980069.00 $2.019 670.38 1$2.060.063.79 52.101,265.1 52.461.966.92 I 526,556.863.10
I
$0.00 50.00 50.00 50.1 50.00
0.00%
$0.00 $0.00 $0.1 $0.00 I 50.00
$0.00 /$5.209.000.00 53 703 000.00 51.163.000.1 51'63000.00 524 134 000.00\
I I
$0.00
($7.221.670.31) (55.763.063.79) ($3,264.265.~ ($3.624,966.92) ! ($48.710,794.10),
I
$0.00 ($2.509,162.88) ($2.524,854.18) $21,767.' 570,399.99 I
$9,000.000.00 56,490,837.12 53,965.982.~ ($439.166.48)1
$6.490,837.12 53,965.982.94 I $3,987. 750.~ ($368.766.49)1
I I
I
I I·
FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 I FY 98 FY 06 ¡
$0.00 54,7'9,507.50 $3.238.209.61 , $3,286,032. ,. 53.695 366.91 I $39.342.027.60
50.00 $7.228.670.381 55.763.063.79) (53,264,265.c" 53.624.966.92) I (548.710.794.10\
50.00 $6.490.837.1£. $~965.9~.94 I $3.987,750.( 5368.766.49l
-- ... -- ...
----- Total F.
- :;: - -. -0-- Total ~
-
à' ;!) ." :8 --+- Reserv]
0
> > > >
... ... ... ...
cpr¡ 010 ~-z.. ( ß)
'3Ç c../i.:J £'¿D",( TI 00
2-8/95)
(2 -8/95
PPS Budget
IVY
and Construction Testi
Total of Enl
IVY
I
[
I
FY 00
FY 99
I
FY 98
I
i
FY 97
.
Rev-Ex!>s)
Operatin!LBudc¡et
FY
Projected Revenue
MSW R........
COO R.......
Wood Wasil Revenue
C>Ihw Revenu.
Total Revenue
Po.' ctoeur. ear.
Total EXEenditures
Starting Reserve
Reserve at End of
Stream
Tipping Fees
MSW
~
Wood Wute
For Tho ChtI1
Total Revenu.
T Dial ExPenditures
RUeN. at End of FY
Net
FY 03
0.000.00
52,000.00
$ 1 .000.00
$75,000.00
$50,000.00
$50.000.00
I
$
FY 02
$10,000.00
$2,000.00
$1,000.00
$75,000.00
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
FY 01
$ 10,000.00
I
i
¡
1
i
r
i
r
I
i
$1,000.00
$75,OOO.0~
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$2.000.00
0,000.00
$1,000.00
$75,000.00
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
S2,000.00
I
$
$3,500,000.00
S350.000.00
$10,000.00
$1,000.00
$75,000.00
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$2.000.00
;
$1,800,000.00
$1 BO.OOO.OO
I
i
$ 1 0,000.00
$1,000.00
$75,000.00
$50.000.00
$50,000.00
$2,000.00
$500,000.00
$50,000.00
$10,000.00
$1,000.00
$75,000.00
5200.000.00
5250.000.00
5100,000.00
000.000.00
1100,000.00
$2,000.00
1200.000.00
$25,000.00
400,000.00
$8,000.000.00
56.000.000.00
$4.000.000.00
$2,000.000.00
$0.00
$25,000.00
$5.000.00
$5.000.00
$25,000.00
$5,000.00
55,000.00
$25,000.00 I
T
55,000.00
55,000.00
g:
>
...
.h\
~\
\
(52,000.000.00)
($4.000.000.00)
\
\
(56.000.000.00)
(58.000.000.00)
520,000.00
5243.000.00
5'5'.000.00
520,000.00
$243.000.00
5151.000.00
;
5243.000.00
5'51,000.00
520.000.00
I
i
,
I
¡
I
i
[
I
l
I
i
[
,
r
T
,
í
$25,000.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
525.000.00
55,000.00
55.000.00
$25,000.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
525,000.00
, 50,000.00 i
115,000.00 I
t
[
55,000.00
55,000.00
520,000,00
5243.000.00
5'51.000.00
520.000.00
54,093,000.00
5' 51.000.00
520,000.00
52,223.000.00
5151,000.00
00,000.00
,60,000.00 '
I
'73.000.00 1-
B1.000.00 :
i
·
997597
43453
FY 06
82896
2957
67
2766
FY 05
(3·8195)
FY 04
80464
2577
995 Budge
IVY
79275
239
FY 03
03
2208
FY 02
78
FY 01
76949
2028
9294
FY 00
75812
1 B50
FY 99
7469
675
FY 98
73588
11502
FY 97
72500
332
(3-11'95
1650
65
995 Budge
FY 96
1
IVY
10000
1.50%
10000
11000
1.50%
11000
8500
1.50%
8500
FY 95
10850
0013
538.00
522.00
521.00
!
9865
538.00
522.00
521.00
97
538.00
522.00
521.00
9575
538.00
522.00
521.00
9434
538.00
522.00
521.00
538.00
522.00
521.00
57
538.00
522.00
521.00
9022
538.00
522.00
521.00
8888
538.00
522.00
521.00
8757
538.00
522.00
521.00
8628
538.00
522.00
521.00
538.00
522.00
521.00
Tipping Fees
MSW
coo
Wood Waste
533,728,698.20
52,913,973,17
52,149,356,24
5550,000.00
539,342,027.60
53, I 50,039.38
5285,063.64
5210,263.89
550,000.00
53,695,366.9
53,103,487.08
5280,850.88
5207,156.54
550,000.00
53,641,494.49
53,057,622.74
5276,700.37
5204,095.11
550,000.00
53,588,418.22
53,012,436.19
5272,611.21
5201,078.93
550,000.00
53,536,126.32
52,967,917.43
5268,582.47
5198,107.32
550,000.00
53,484,607.22
52,924,056.58
5264,613.27
5195,179.62
550,000.00
53,433,849.47
52,880,843.92
5260,702.73
5192,295.19
550,000.00
53,383,841.85
52,838,269.88
5256,849.98
5189,453.39
550,000.00
53,334,573.25
,
52,796,325.00
5253,054.17
5186,653.59
550,000.00
Ú,286,032.76
52,755,000.00
5249,314,45
5183,895.16
550,000.00
53.238,209.6
54,242,700.00
5245,630.00
5181,177,50
550,000.00
54,719,507.50
Projected Revenue
MSW Revenue
CDD Revenue
Wood Was1e Revenue
Other Revenue
Total Revenue
980,069.00
2.00%
980,069.00)
538.00)
2.00%
!.!
51
526,556,863,10
966.92
$46.32
$2,46
30.56
$~3,012
$3,839,880.43
$16,244,000.00
5243,000,00
5220,000,00
($74,053,387,07)
520,000.00
($6,564,893.67)
52,366,365.75
52,319,966.42
$2
$2,060,063.79
(538.76
$2,810.100.00
$2.019,670.38
:$38.00
50.00
413.693.06
:$45.4
$2
$44.52
543.65
52.274.476.88
:$42.79
$2,229,879.30
:$41.96
56.17
3
.1
54
86
52
43,290.36
540.33
$2
265.06
$39.54
o
$3,708,954.34
$3,582,492.36
$3.460,342.28
53,342,357.07
$3.228,394.74
8,318.
53
994.70
$3.0
$2,909,296.53
52,223,000.00
$243,000.00
5243,000.00
$243,000.00
$243,000.00
5243,000.00
$243,000.00
$4,093,000.00
$3,273,000.00
$4,954,000.00
50.00
rovements
CaøilO' 1m
520,000.00
($6,385,692.82)
$20,000.00
($6,211,902.63)
$20,000.00
($6.043,352.35)
$20,000.00
(55,879,876.75)
520,000.00
(55,721,315,99)
$20,000.00
(55,567,515,4
$20,000.00
(59,268,325.39)
$20,000.00
(57,253,601.13)
$20.000.00
($8,163,202.55)
$20,000.00
(56,993,708.38)
Post Closure Ca..
Total Ex~enditures
($2,869,526.76)
(522,841,832.70)
($25,711,359.47)
($2.744,198.32)
($20,097,634.38)
($22,841,832.70)
(52,623,484.4
($17.474,149.97)
($20,097,634.38)
($2,507,226.02)
($14,966,923.94)
($17,474,149.97)
($2,395,269.53)
($12,571,654.4
(514,966,923.94
($2,287,466.52),
($10,284,187.89)
($12,571,654.4
($2,183,673.57)
(58,100,514.33)
($10,284,187.89)
(55,933,752.14
($2,166,762.19)
($8,1 DO,S I 4.33)
($3,967,568.37)
8
9)
$1,800,806.
($2,166,762.
($4.924,992.94)
$6,725,799.12
51,800,806.18
(52,274,200.88)
59.000,000,00
56,725,799.12
50.00
{Rev-Expsl
Operating Budget
Starting Reserve
Reserve at End of FY
Net
$39,342,027.60
$74,053,387.07
FY 06
$3,695.366.91
56,564,893.67
$25,711.359,47
FY 05
494.49
692.82
832.70
$3,641
$6,385
$22.841
FY 04
$3,588,418.22
$6,211,902.63
520,097,634.38
FY 03
126.32
352.35
149.97
g536
$6,043
517.474
FY 02
$3,484,607,22
$5,879,876.75
$14,966,923.94
FY 01
$3,433,849.47
$5.721,315.99
$12,571,654.41
FY 00
$3,383,841.85
55,567,515.41
$10,284,187.89
FY 99
$3,334,573.25
59,268,325.39
$8,100,514.33
FY 98
53,286,032.76
$7,253,601.13
52,166,762.19
FY 97
53,238.209.6
$8,163,202.55
$1,800,806.18
FY 96
$4,719,507.50
$6,993,708.38
$6,725,799.12
95
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
FY
The Chan
Total Revenue
T olal Expendnures
Reserve at End of FY
For
-- Total Revenue
-0-- Total Expenditures
--+- Reserve a1 End ot FY
8
>
...
'"
o
>
...
510.000,000.00
(55,000,000.00)
s
0,000,000.00)
(5 I 5,000,000.00)
55,000,000.00
50.00
(520,000,000.00)
(525,000,000.00)
3(Þ)
Tr?A.,..::J) f{S::,<-
LJPTí D,J
($30.000,000.00)
5900,000.00
~
53,000,000.00
5320,000.00
5500,000.00
575,000.00
5250,000.00
55.000.00
53.200.000.00
5360,000.00
53,200,000.00.
5360,000.00
55.300.000.0<1
5200.000.00
IVY 1995 Bud~' (5-8/95)
-
FY 05 FY 06
!
i
---¡
::::J
I
5500.000.00
575.000.00
52,400.000.00
5240.000.00
5800,000.00
5120.000.00
FY 01 I FY 02 l FY 03 FY 04
! I
I l
I
,
I
I
I
51.000.000.00 I 52.000,000.00
5120.000.00 5200,000.00
I
i
i
r
1
l
i
I
¡
i
i
I
I
i
l
1
I
ï
510.000.00 ï
i
52.400.000.00
5240.000.00
5300,000.00
. 55,000.0<1
5100.000.00
511,000.00
5ë25.õõõ.õõ
525.000.00
5600.000.00
5375,000.00
5150,000.00
5 1.500,000. 00
5650,000.Ol'
5450.000.00
522.000.00
5300.000.00
575,000.00
5600.000.00
575.000.00
5500.000.00
S25.õõõ:õõ
5100,000.00
525.000.00
5100.000.00
525.000.00
"00.000.00
550.000.00
5250.000.00
525.000.00
šS5.õõõ.Oc
5~
S55,õõõ:õõ
5 1 .050,000.00
5125,000.00
595.000.00
55.000.00
$0.00
SD.õó
510.000.00 510,000.00 510.000.00 510000.00 !
I
51.000.00 51 000.00 51 000.00 51,000.00 ,
575.000.00 575 000.00 575.000.00 575.000.00 I
I
i
I
I
I
J
550.000.00 550.000.00 550.000.00 550.000.00 I
550 000.00 550.000.00 550,000.00 550.000.00 I
I
52.000.00 52 000.00 52.000.00 52.000.00 I
I
I
I
I
i
i
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
525.000.00 525.000.00 525.000.00 525.000.00 !
- - -
55.000.00 55,000.00 55,000.00 55.000.00
55.000.00 55,.000.00 55.000.00 55.000.00
.''1"
,.
510,000.00
51,000.00
575.000.00
l
I
i
i
i
i
550,000.00 i
550,000.00 I
,.
52.000.00 I
- i
i
i
i
T
T
T
i
i
i
i
i
I
f
55.000.00
!
I
i
i
¡
I
I
51.000.00
575.000.00
525.000.00
55.000.00
I
I
I
550.000.00
550,000.00
S2.õõõ:õõ
525.000.00
55.000.00
55,000.00
FY 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5800.000.00
5120.000.00
510.000.00
51.000.00
575,000.00
550.000.00
550,000.00
52.000.00
525.000.00
55.000.00
55,000.00
i
ï
ï
ï
ï
T
-"
1
I
ì
.,
I
ï
ï
ì
ï
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
+
T
I
i
!
I
i
I
I
-
FY 98 I FY 99
- I
- l
- ~
-
-
- :1
-
-
- I
- I
- I
- J
-
- J -
I
- ï -
- ì -
- J -
- -
- i -
- I -
1
- ï -
51.800.000.001 -
5100.000.00 I -
I
I -
5;'0.000.00 I -
510,000.00
r
51 ,000.00 i 51.000.00
575,000.00 1 575.000.00
i
1
~
550.000.00
550.000.00
52.000.00
525,000.00
55.000.00
55.000.00
I
I
T
i
I
í
550.000.00
550.000.00
52.000.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
525.000.00
-
55.000.00
55,000.00
FY 96 FY 97 !
t
- -
- -
-
5900.000.00
590 000.00
5250000.00
55,000.00
53.500000.00
5100.000.00
5300.000.00
55 000.00
510.000.00
I
51 000.00 51.000.00 I
575 000.00 575.000.00 I
525000.00 I
5400,000.00 5200.000.00 I
5125,000.00 5250.000.00 I
550.000.00 5100.000.00 I
5500.000.00 51.000.000.00 I
5100.000.00 5100.000.00 I
,
I
I
!
52.000.00 52.000.00 I
I
5300.000.00 I
575.000.00 I
I
5600,000.00 i
575.000.00
5500,000.00 i
525.000-:õOT
5100.000.00
525.000.00
5100,000.00
525.000.00 I
I
5400.000.00 I
550.000.00 i
525.000.00 ,
525.000.00
55.000.00 55.000.00 '
5200,000.00
55.000.00 5S.000.00 I
i
I
5300.000.00 5750.000.00 .
530.000.00 S95.000.00 :
595,000.00
š5.öOõ:õõ
995 Budg.' (5·8195)
IVY
95
FY
3
Coil 3
CDD Cell Upgrading (Raincover
Construction
.É!!a!,neerina
O&M
Waste to Compost
Cel:
Closure ConstructIon
Phase II Construction (Cells 1 &2
Construction
EngineerinwCOA
Phase III Construction (Current & Part 01
Construction
EnoineeringICOA
Phue IV Constn.lction ( Cell 4 and Pan of
Construction
EnaineerinolCQA
New MSW Cell Construction
Raincov. over Cuneo1 Cell
Construction
EngineeriniVCOA
Cell 4 (MSW) Construction
Construction
EnaineerinG'COA
CeliS (MSW) Construction
Construction
EnoineerinG'CQA
Wasle to CompOst Plant
Construction
EnaineerinQlCOA.
Option 4
Groundwater
Annual RepOl1 fEnginHrino)
Au_amen! Monitoring CEngÎneel ~
Permit Amendment (Engineering' _
Rate and Extent Studies (EnaineerinQ)
Assessment of Corrective Action (Enoineerina)
Corrective Action Plan (Enaineerina)
Construction of CA Measurel
Construction
EnaineerinotLaboratorv
Remediation O&M
Leachate Management
Ouartertv Sampling and Analysis
Remedial Work on CDO area (trenches
Construction
Enoineering
Remedial WO/1( on MSW unlined area (trenches
Construction
Engineering
Leachate Tank
Construction
Enoineering
Luchate Pump station (CDD)
Construction
Engineering
Leachate Pump station (MSW)
Construction
Enaineering
Leachale Treatment Svs1em
Construction
EnoineerinQ
Leachal. Treamen1 O&M
Air Quality
Innill Air Quality Permn
Annual T aSlina
Collection Measure
CoIloc1ion 0& M
Facility Improvements
Stormw.ter ContTol
Construction
EnQineering
Office and Parking
Construction
Enaineering
Citizen Convience Cen!er
Construction
Enaineering
Otf.ce Buildino Addition at the Moore'
5200.000.00
5100.000.00
~ 520.000.00 I $20.000.00 ' $320.000.00
5243.000.00 I 51.163.000.00 I $3.458.000.00 $;>7.528.000.00
or Tï u.f--J 4(1--\)
l)J!\')IC -70 (,)/..{?O )T
520.000.00
S2.443.000 00
i
-
-
-
- $20.000.00
$20.000.00 520.000.00
$1.163.00000 !2.883.000.00 S1.363.00000
520.000.00 ; 520.000.00
52.143.000.00· 5243.000.00
¡ ____586.000.00 1_ -
!200.000.00
$100.000.00
580.000.00 S60.000.00
SO.OO I $8.809.000.00 53,703.000,00
Cree
Engineering)
(
Permillng Tasks
Site Plan
Pan 8 Application
General ConsultinQ
TOTAL
Budg.t (5-81115)
'PP5
IVY
527'ßOO.00
5'5'.000.00
5' .000.00
000.00
5'5'
,000.00
(5-8IP5
5' .0
Budget
,000.00
'PP5
38
IVY
5'
50.00
and Construction Te.tin,
Total or Enl
000.00
11
5~
'REF!
oÆF!
5'5'.000.00
4IREA
53P' .000.00
I
t
i
i
j
i
I
06
FY
05
FY
04
FY
03
FY
02
FY
01
FY
00
FY
99
FY
98
FY
97
FY
96
FY
95
'0000
1.50%
'0000
FY
9P75P7
82896
8'67
80~6~
79275
78'03
769~P
758
7~69
73S88
72500
650
,
'000
.50%
'000
~3~53
2957
2766
2577
239
2208
2028
"850
, '675
502
332
65
,
8500
'.50%
8500
Waste Stream
0850
00'
538.00
522.00
52'.00
9865
538.00
522.00
521.00
97
538.00
522.00
521.00
9575
538.00
522.00
521.00
9~3~
538.00
522.00
52'.00
92P~
538.00
522.00
52'.00
9'57
538.00
522.00
521.00
9022
538.00
522.00
521.00
8888
538.00
522.00
52'.00
8757
538.00
522.00
521.00
8628
538.00
522.00
521.00
538.00
$22.00
52'.00
Tipping Fees
MSW
~
Wood Wasl.
533,728.698.20
52.9' 3.973.17
52,1 ~ 9 .356.2~
5550.000.00
539,3~2.027 .60
53.' 50.03P.38
5285.063.6~
52'0.263.89
550.000.00
53.695.366.P'
$3.103.~87.08
5280.850.88
5207.156.5~
550.000.00
53.6H.~9~.~P
53.057.622.7~
5276.700.37
520~,095."
$50.000.00
53,588.~ '8.22
$3.0'2.~36. '9
5272.6" .2'
520' .078.93
550.000.00
53,536. '26.32
52,967,9 17 .~3
5268,582.~7
5'98.107.32
550,000.00
53.~8~,607.22
52 ,92~,056.58
526~,6'3.27
5' P5,179.62
550.000.00
53,~33.8~9.~7
52.880.8~3.92
5260.702.73
51 P2,295. ,g
550,000.00
53,383,8~' .85
-'
52.838,269.88
5256,8~9.98
5'89.~53.39
550.000.00
53,33~ ,573.25
52,796,325.00
$253,05~.17
5'86.653.59
$50,000.00
$3,286.032.76
52,755.000.00
5N9.31~.~5
5183.895.'6
550,000.00
53.238,209.6'
5~,2~2,700.00
52~5.630.00
$'8','77.50
550,000.00
5~,7'9,507.50
52,229,879.30
52
~3.290.36
50.00
50.00
52
0' ,265.06
50.00
50.00
$2
52J160.063.79
52,0' P,670.38
$, ,980.069.00
2.00%
5',P80,06P.00)
$0.00
0.00%
526,556,863.'0
52.~61,966.92
52.~ 13,693.06
52,366.365.75
~
50.00
52,3'P.966.~2
50.00
50.00
52.27~.~76.88
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
56.'7
50.00
50.00
50.00
86
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
$0.00
50.00
Projected Revenue
MSW Rev.....
CDD Roy.....
Wood Waltl Revenue
Other R.....nu.
Total Revenue
50.00
527,614,000.00
53,~58,000.00
63.000.00
51
52~3.000.00
52,~~3.000.00
363,000.00
51
52.883,000.00
63,000.00
51
52~3,000.00
~3.000.00
$2
53,703.000.00
58.809,000.00
50.00
c.
POI' Closurl Care
Total Expenditures
~
(552,' 90, 79~.1 0)
(55,PIP,966.92)
(53,576.693.06)
(52.609,365.75)
(5~,762,966.~2)
(53,637,476.88
(55.' 12.879.30)
7)
(53,3~9, 156.
(52,386,290.36)
($2,22~.600.01
5'.62~,'66.~8
(53.8~8.766.~9
I
FY 06
53.695.366.9'
55.P' 9.966.92
53.8~8,766.~9
FY 05
53.6~',~9~.~9
53.576.693.06
51,~_~,166.~8
FY 04
53.58B.~18.22
52.609.365.75
5' .6BB.967 .91
FY 03
53.536.126.32
5~,762,966.~2
52,668,020.38
FY 02
$3.~8~.607.22
$3,637.~76.88
5',~",180.29
FY 01
53.~33.8~P.~7
55,112,87P.30
51.288,310.62
FY 00
53.383.8~ 1.85
53,3~9. '56.17
5390.71P.20
FY 99
53,33~,573.25
52,386.2PO.36
5356.033.52
(5~,2~~,265.06)
(55,763,063.7P
($10,B28,670.38)
564,801.~3
(5',688.967.9
(51,62~.166.~8)
5979,052.47
(52.668,020.38
($',68B.967.9
(51 ,226.8~0.09
(51."','80.29)
(52.668.020.38)
$'52,868.66)
$, .288,3'0.62)
51.'~1.180.2P)
(51.679,02P.82)
5390,719.20
(5',288,3'0.62)
53~,685.67
5356.033.52
5390.719.20
59~8,282.88
(5592,2~P.36)
5356,033.52
(5958,232.3
5365,982.9~
(55P2,2~P.36)
8)
$2.8PO.837.12
5365,982.9~
(52,52~,B5~
OP.'62.88)
5P.000,OOO.00
52,890.837.12
($6.
50.00
Rev-Exps)
O :)eratin9.ßudget
Starting Reserve
Reserve at End of
Net
FY 98
53.286.032.76
$~.2~~,265.06
5592,2~9.36
FY 97
53.23B,209.61
$5.763.063.7P
S365,982.9~
FY 96
5~.719.507.50
510.828.670.38
52,890.837. '2
95
50.00
50.00
50.00
FY
FY
For The Chert
Total Revenue
Total Expenditures
Reserve at End of FY
T ctal Revenue
----.-
---<>-
-
Total Expenditures
i
S6.000.000.00
5~.000.000.00
52,000.000.00
50.00
'"
"'.
?i
(52.000.000.00)
(S~.OOO.OOO.OO)
Reserve at End of FY
(56.000.000.00)
'.f!"
"
(58.000.000.00)
o
0.000.000.00)
5
4(,i')
r"vµJÚ)T
ð fr¡ oJ
W f4 'i7 ç- T c.J
512.000.000.00)
(5·8/95)
, i95 Budge'
IVY
(5-8J1 5)
'995 Budget
IVY
5900.000.00
590,000.00
53,000,000.00
5320,000.00
I
I
06
FY
FY 05
04
FY
03
52,000,000.00
5200,000.00
FY
I
I
02
51,000,000.00
5120,000.00
FY
I
01
FY
00
FY
I
T
99
FY
I
i
i
I
FY 98
-
!
i
I
I
97
FY
96
5900,000.00
590,000.00
FY
95
FY
3
3
RDF
Closure Construction
Phase II Construction (Cells 1 &2
ConstnJetion
EngineeriniYCOA
Phase III ConslTuction (Current & Pan 01 een
Construction
Engineering/COA
Pha.. IV ConslTuction ( Cell ~ and Pan 01 Call
Construction
EngineeriniYCOA
New MSW Cell Construction
O~tion 5
I
5500,000.00
575,000.00
5500,000.00
575,000.00
5250,000.00
55,000.00
53,200,000.00
5360,000.00
f
52,~00,000.00
52~0,000.00
5800,000.00
5120,000.00
I
l
l
I
~
r
!
i
52,~00,000.00
5240,000.00
5800,000.00
5'20,000.00
I
Raincover over Current cen
Construction
EngineeriniYCOA
Cell .. (MSW) Construction
Construction
EngineerinwCOA
CeI! 5 (USW) Construction
Construction
EnQineerinG'COA
RDFPIant
Construction
EngineerinG'CQA
I
I
[
I
I
i
r
r
I
i
5250,000.00
55,000.00
53,200,000.00
5360,000.00
53,900,000.00
5100,000,00
55,900,000.00
5200,000.00
I
"
r
52,000,000.00
5100,000.00
CDD Cell Upgrading (Ralncover)
Com:truction
~ineering
O&M
I
r
i
53~
55,000.00
5300,000.00
55,000.00
5'00,000.00
511,000.00
5825,000.00
525,000.00
5600,000.00
5375,000.00
5150,000.00
5'0,000.00 I
. 1
I
51,000.00
575.õõõ:õõ
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
510,000.00
5',000.00
575,000.00
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
510,000.00
I
51,000.00 I
š75.õõõ:õõ
I
5'0,000.00 I
T
I
51,000.00
575,000.00
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
I
r
I
r
i
510,000.00
5',000.00
575.õõõ:õõ
r
I
i
i
l
I
5' ,500,000.00
5650,000.00
5~50,000.00
522,000.00
5300,000.00
575,000.00
$600,000.00
$75,000.00
$500,000.00
525,000.00
5100,000.00
$25,000.00
$100,000.00
$25,000.00
l
!
I
$10,000.00
$~~:~~~:~~
5200,000.00
5250,000.00
$'00,000.00
51,000.00
$ 75.õõõ:õõ
$25,000.00
5400,000.00
5'25,000.00
550,000.00
$500,000.00
$'00,000.00
Groundwater
Annuli ReDOf1 (Engineerino)
Msessmen1 Monitoring lEnaineerino &
Permit Amendment (Engineerina)
Rat. and Extent Studies (Engineering) ~
Ass....m.nt 01 Corrective Action IEnoineerina)
Corrective Action Plan lEnoine.rino)
Construction of CA Measures
Cons1Tuc:1ion
EnainMrinøfLaboralotY
Remediation O&.M
Lab'
I
I
i
5' ,000,000.00
5'00,000.00
I
i
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
550,000.00
550.000.00
52,000.00
550,000.00
Sšõ.õõõ.õõ
52,000.00
550,000.00
S5õ.õõõ:õõ
$2,000.00
550,000.00
$50,000.00
52,000.00
I
i
[
I
i
i
i
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
I
i
i
i
,
I
550,000.00
550,000.00
S2.õõõ:õõ
T
i
i
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
52,000.00
5500,000.00
525,000.00
52,000.00
53õõ.õõõ.õõ
575,000.00
5600,000.00
575,000.00
$'00,000.00
525,000.00
5100,000.00
525,000.00
Leachate Management
Ouart.nv Samø'ina and Anatvsis
Remecbl Work on coo at.a (ttenches
Construction
Engineering
Remedial Work on MSW unlined at88 (trenches
Construction
Enoineering
leachate Tank
Construction
Enoineering
leachate Pump $1ation (COO>
Construction
Engineerina
leachate Pump station (MSW)
Construction
Enoineerino
leachate T,eatment System
Construction
Enaineelina
leachate T,elmenl O&M
,
5400,000.00
550,000.00
5400,000.00
550,000.00
5250,000.00
525,000.00
525,000.00
555,000.00
5200,000.00
555,000.00
525,000.00
55.000.00
525,000.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
525,000.00
55,000.00
55.000.00
525,000.00
~
$5,000.00
r
525,000.00
55,000.00
~
525,000.00
55,000.00
525,000.00
~
55,000.00
525,000.00 :
I
I
55,000.00 :
525,000.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
1
55,000.00
525,000.00
55,000.00
52~
55,000.00
Air Quality
Initial Ai, Quality Permit
Annual T estino
Collection Measures
Collection 0&101
5' .050.000.00
5'25,000.00
I
I
!
I
I
55,000.00
i
¡
55,000.00
i
l
55,000.00
I
55,000.00
S7S0.000.00
595.000.00
5300.000.00
530,000.00
s~
55,000.00
Facility Improvements
Stonnwale, Control
Construction
Engineelina
OtftCe and Parking
Construction
Eng;neeling
Cm." Convience Cenler
Construction
Engineering
OfffCe Suildine Addition a1 the
595,000.00
S5.õõõ.õõ
I
r
f
I
í
50. CO
Sõ:Ðõ
.,
i
I
586.000.00
Creek
Moore'
Engineering)
(
Permltlng Tasks
Sile Plan
Part B Applica1ion
General Consutti'!9.
5200,000.00
580,000.00
5100.000.00
560,000.00
SCA\
()p"oJ
\2-DF
5200,000.00
5 I 00,000.00
5320.000.00
28.000.00
.1
528
520.000.00
53."58.000.00
520,000.00
63.000.00
.1
$'
$20,000.00
$243.000.00
$20,000.00
$2."0.00000
520,000.00
$' .363.000.00
~
52,883.000 00
$20.000.00
63.000.00
$'
I
-
5243.000.00 '
$20,000.00
$20,00000
52.3"3.000.00
53.703.000.00
5£0.209.000.00
50.00
TOTAL
BudgM (5-8JV5)
1995
IVY
000.00
$'5'
,000.00
(5-8195)
$1,0
.000.00
1
$4
IREFI
IREF1
$15',000.00
IREA
$391,000.00
000.00
$27
000.00
$15
000.00
$15
997597
43453
0850
001
$38.00
ill'"º-º.
$21.00
'995 BudO.
$1.38'.000.00
06
82806
2957
9865
$38.00
m:õõ
š21M
IVY
$0.00
and Construction T..tin,
Total 01 En,
FY
05
8167
2766
97
$38.00
$22.00
$21.00
FY
04
80464
2577
9575
538.00
522.00
$21.00
FY
03
79275
239
I
i
i
i
i
i
9434
$38.00
$22.00
$21.00
FY
02
78'03
2208
9294
~
$22.00
$21.00
FY
01
76949
2028
9157
~
m&.Q.
$21.00
FY
00
75812
850
9022
$38.00
$22.00
S21.00
FY
99
7469
11675
8888
S38.00
S22.00
S21.00
FY
FY 98
73588
11502
8757
S38.00
$22.00
$21.00
97
72500
332
8628
~
lli'"º-º.
521.00
FY
650
65
S38.00
m:õõ
š21M
Tipping Fees
MSW
CDD
Wood Waste
Projected Revenue
MSW Revenue
CDD Royenu.
Wood Waste Revenue
Other Revenue
RDF Royenu.
Total Revenue
96
11
1
FY
DODD
.50%
DODD
11000
LW!.
11000
~
1~
8500
95
FY
Waste Stream
S33.728.698.20
S2.913.973.17
S2;149.356.24
$550.000.00
$950,000.00
$40.292,027.60
$3.150.039.38
$285.063.64
$210.263.89
$50,000.00
$100.000.00
$3,795.366.9
53.'03,487.08
$280.850.88
$207.156.54
$50,000.00
$'00.000.00
$3.741,494.49
$3.057.622.74
$276,700.37
$204.095.11
$50.000.00
$100.000.00
$3.688.4' 8.22
$3.012,436.19
$272.611.21
$201.078.93
$50.000.00
$, 00.000.00
$3.636,126.32
$2,967,917.43
$268,582.47
$198,107.32
$50.000.00
$, 00.000.00
$3,584.607.22
$2,924,056.58
$264.613.27
$195,179.62
S50.000.00
$100.000.00
$3,533,849.47
$2.880,843.92
$260,702.73
$, 92,295.19
$50.000.00
$100.000.00
S3.483,841.85
$2,838.269.88
S256,849.98
SI89.453.30
S50.000.00
S100,OOO.00
S3.434,573.25
S2,796,325.00
$253,054.17
S186,653.59
S50,000.00
S50,OOO.00
S3.336,032.76
S2,755.000.00
$249.314.45
$183.895.16
$50.000.00
S50,OOO.00
S3.288,209.61
S4.242.700.00
$245.630.00
S181,177.50
S50,000.00
S50,OOO.00
$4,769,507.50
S34,348,225.62'
SO.OO
$28,214,000.00
SO.OO
(S60,582,156.62)
S3.139,053.26
$0.00
S3,077,503.20
SO.OO
SO.OO
~
!MQ.
Sõ.õõ
S3,017
$2,958.000.00
S2.900.000.00
SO.OO
SO.OO
$2.019.670.38
!Q&Q.
šõ:õõ
$1,980.069.00
2.00%
SI.980,969.00)
$0.00
0.00%
Costs
$3,397,812.20
$0.00
88.44
SO.OO
$0.00
$3,331
$3,265,871.02
$0.00
$0.00
$3,20',834.33
$0.00
$0.00
SO. DO
SI,363,0õõ:õã
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
SO.OO
$3,458.000.00
000.00
63
$,
$243.000.00
$2.443,000.00
S2,883,000.00
63.000.00
SI
$243,000.00
$2.343.000.00
$9,?09,000.00
$0.00
c.
Po.' Cloaur. C.r.
Total Expenditures
($4,502,053.26)
(S5.960.503.20)
($4,180,160.00)
($3,201,000.00)
($5,243,000.00)
($5,763.063.79)
,228,670.38
($1
(S6.855,812.20)
($4,494,188.44
($3.508,87' .02)
($5.644.834.33
($3,060,445.29)
($8,229.683.72)
($1' ,290.129.0
($752,693.94
($7,476,989.78
($8.229.683.72)
$179.547.20
(57,476.989.78)
(52.008,708.00)
(55.647,828.98
(57.6S6.536.98)
540.292,027.60
560,582.156.62)
FY 06
53,795.366.91
56.855,812.20
$",290,129.0
FY 05
53~4.49
$4.494,188."
58,229.683.72
FY 04
53.68!.4' 8.22
53.508.871.02
57 ~76,989.78
FY 03
$3.636. '26.32
55.644.834.33
57,656,536.98
59'7,446.05)
($4.730,382.93)
($5.647.828.98
($2.426,653.73)
($2,303.729.20)
(S4.730,382.93)
($696.318.15)
($1,607,4" .05)
(52,303,729.20)
$233,573.25
(51.840,984.30)
$1,607.411.05)
,906,967.24
565.982.94
-
,840,984.30)
($
8)
$2.540,837. '2
$65,982.94
($2,474.854
(56.459, '62.88
59,000,000.00
$2.540,837.
$0.00
(Rev-Exps)
Budget
FY
Starting Reserve
Reserve at End of
Operating
Net
FY 01
$3.533,849.47
$5,960.503.20
$4.730,382.93
FY 00
$3.483,84' .85
54,180,'60.00
$2~3,729.20
FY 99
$3,434,573.25
$3.201,000.00
5'.607,411.05
(5
FY 98
$3.336,032.76
$5.243.000.00
$, .840.984.30
FY 97
$ 3-:2B8.2õ 9 . 6'
$5,763.063.79
$65,982.94
FY 96
$4,769.507.50
$11 ,228.670.38
$2,540,837.12
95
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
FY
F", Th. Chan
Total Reyenue
Total ExPendi1ures
Reserve a1 End 01 FY
Revenue
Expenditures
Reserve al End of FY
-.- Total
--0-- Total
---+-
..
o
>-
...
$6,000.000.00
152.000.000.00)
56.000.000.00)
(54.000.000.00)
54,000,000.00
52.000.000.00
SO.OO
~
/
o
S8.000.000.00)
S'O.OOO.OOO.OO)
S, 2 .000.000.00)
ç(ß·'
óp-r; 00
0.ÞF-
Budp.' (6-81115)
1995
IVY
(6·Ø/g5)
Budp.'
1995
IVY
5900,000.00
ššõ:õõõ:õõ
55,300,000.00
5530.000.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
5360. O"ºº,-ºº-
50.00
50.00
50.00
!
524,000,000.00
52,500,000.00
,
!
I
i
I
I
5300.000;00
55,000.00
5300,000.00
. 55,000.00
5100,000.00
511,000.00
5825,000.00
525,000.00
5600,000.00
5375,000.00
5150,000.00
06
FY
FY 05
04
FY
03
FY
I
i
02
FY
01
FY
00
FY
99
FY
I
i
i
i
I
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
510.000.00
51.000.00
575.000.00
i
I
r
T
I
510.000.00
51.000.00
575,000.00
510,000.00
51.000.00
575.õõõ.õõ
I
98
53,500,000.00
5350,000.00
I
r
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
510.000.00 !
T
I
51,000.00
575.000.00
FY
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
I
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
97
51 ,800.000.00
5180,000.00
52.400.000.00
5240.000.00
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
I
i
i
i
i
i
r
[
I
510,000.00
51,000.00
575,000.00
52õõ:õõõ.õõ
5250,000.00
5100,000.00
51,000.000.00
5100.000.00
FY
96
5900,000.00
590,000.00
5800.000.00
5120,000.00
524,000,000.00
52,500.000.00
CDD Cell Upgrading (Raincover)
Construction
.!!!9!neerino
0&1.1
51.000.00
575.õõõ:õõ
525,000.00
5400,000.00
5125,000.00
550.000.00
Groundwater
AnnuaJ Report (EnoÎnMrina)
Assessment Monitorina (Enoineerina &
Permit Amendment (Enoineering)
Rate and Ext.", Studies (Enaineering)
AsHSlme", 01 Conective Action (Enaineerina¡-
Corrective Action Pill" (Enoineerino'
Construction of CA Measures
Construction
EnoÎneerinQlLabotlltorv
Remediation 0&1.1
Lab
FY
95
FY
Waste to Energy
Closure Construction
Phase II Construction {Cells' &2
Construction
EngineerinG'CQA
Ph... III CanslTuction (Current & Cell 3
Construction
Engi_ring/COA
Phase IV Construction
Construction
Enoineering/COA
New MSW Cell Construction
R.incoyw over Current Cell
Construction
EnaineørinQlCOA
Call .. (USW) Construction
Construction
EnaineerinotCOA
Cen 5 CMSW) Construction
Construction
Enoineering/COA
Waste to Enerav Plant
Construction
Enoi_ring/COA
Option 6
i
!
5500,000.00
5100.000.00
,-
5 1 ,500,000.00
5650,000.00
5450.000.00
522,000.00
5300,000.00
575.000.00
.-
5600,000.00
575,000.00
I
i
5600,000.00
575,000.00
~ .-~
i
I
5500,000.00
525,000.00
5500,000.00
m:õõõ.õõ
5100.000.00
525,000.00
5100,000.00
š25,õõõ:õõ
5400.000.00
550,000.00
5250,000.00
'.
525,000.00
Sš5.õõõ:õõ
52õõ:õõõ.õõ
Sš5.õõõ:õõ
I
525,000.00 i
I
_1
55,000.00
525.000.00
55.000.00
55,000.00
5 1,050,000.00
5125,000.00
I
i
I
i
,
550,000.00
550,000.00
52.000.00
i
i
525.000.00
~
ss:õõõ.õõ
55.000.00
55,000.00
j
5400,000.00
~
5100.000.00
525,000.00
550,000.00
550.000.00
550.000.00
52.000.00
525,000.00
55.000.00
55.000.00
I
¡
,
,
Leachate Management
Oulrteñv Samplino and Anatv.i$
Remedial Work on CDO area (trenches
COf'IItruction
Engineerina
Remecia! Work on MSW unlined ar.. (trenchea
COf'Wtruction
Enoineerina
leachate Tank
Coostruction
Enoineerina
leachate Pump Itabon (COO)
Corwtruction
Enoineerino
LeacNte Pump station (MSW)
Construction
EnoinHrina
leachate Treatmenl System
Construction
Enoineerina
leachate Treamenl O&M
550.000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
550,000.00
550.000.00
52,000.00
S50,OOO.00
S50,000.00
52.000.00
I
550.000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
I
i
525.000.00
55,000.00
~
I
i
525,000.00
55,000.00
525,000.00
55,000.00
~
550,000.00
550,000.00
52,000.00
I
i
550,000.00
S5õ.õõõ:õõ
52,000,00
52,000.00
52,000.00
5300.000.00
575,000.00
525,000.00
~
~
525,000.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
5100.000.00
S25,OOO.00
~
55,000.00
525,000.00
55,000.00
5200,000.00
~
Air Quality
Initial Air Oualrrv Permí1
Annual Tutino
Collection Measures
Collection 0& M
5~
S95.000.00
5300.000.00
530,000.00
595,000.00
ss:õõõ.õõ
Facility Improvements
Stormwaler Control
Construction
Engineerina
OffICe and Parkina
Construction
Engineering
Citizen Convience Cenler
Construction
Engineering
Ottice Building Addition at the
595.000.00
S5.Oõo.õõ
,
'.f:"
'"
I
Moore's Creek
50.00
Sõ:õõ
566,000.00
¡
I
-
5200,000.00
Engineering)
(
Permiting Tasks
Site Plan
Pan B Application
General Consultlno
5200.000.00
50.00
5320.000.00
,
520,000.00
520.000.00
520.000.00
520.00000
52< 3.000 00 T
520.000.00
520.000.00
520,000.00
520.000.00
520.000.00
S..,093.000.00
560.000.00
58.223.00000
5S0.000.00
!32.37..000.00
50 00
TOTAL
~)
- -0/""¡
~N~)'::""'" l
Co
6PTlü0
T-.:
v..-ìtl, S T ¿.
50.3<8.00000
5243.000.00
5243.000.00
$2.(3.00000
52'3.000.00
52<3.00000
52<3.000.00
52<3.000.00
IVY 111115 Budg.' (6-81115) IVY 111gs Budll.' (6.81115)
SO.OO I S1,376.000.00 SII" ,000.00 I S151,OOO.00 I S151,OOO.00 I S15~S151.000.00ì iiFi
-~
.
S3,646,000.00
and Construction Tes,
T ot.1 01 E...,
06
FY
05
FY
FY 04
80464
$38.00
š22:õO
S2ï:õõ
o pTï ü JJ Lo ( p )
Ub..')T¿ 10 C¡J GI2-6-1
S2.880· S3,057.622.74
S260 S276,700.37
S1112 S204,01l5. I I
$50 $50,000.00
$1.857 $2,0110.785.57
$5,241 S5,6711,203.711
;
S2,838,2611.88
$256.8411.118
$1811,.53.311
$50,000.00
$1,803,530.00
$5,138,103.25
S4,7111,507.50
($ I ,1180,0611.00
2.00%
($1,980,0611.00) S4.200,000.00 S4,369.680.00' $4,~57 .073.60'
55 OU 388.711 $5. 1111,716.56
SO.OO 50.00 SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO
0.00% - SO.OO
- 50.00 SO.OO
SO.OO SO.OO SO.OO 50.00
- SO.OO
SO.OO 50.00
SO.OO $32,37. 000.00· $8.223.000.00 '$4 .093.000.00 ($243,000.00 ~ $243,000.00
- $243 000.00 ($243,000.00)
-
($36.574,000.00) ($12.507,000.00) (58,462,680.00) (S4.700,073.60) ($4,7805, 163.11611.40)
- ($5,262,388.711) ($5,362.776.56)
$0.00 (53 1,854.4112.50) ($7.568,7110.311) ($3.425,647 .24) $438,0211.65 ~ 5515.234.311
- 5532.61. .84 $550.704.76
U,OOO.OOO.OO ($22,854,492.50) ($30,423,282.811) ($33,848,1130.13) ($33.4',,5,0,536.32)
(522,854,492.50) ($30,423,282.811)1 ($33,848,930.13) ($33,410.900.48) ($32.95'O,1I95.301.g3) (530,9115,301.113) ($30,462,687.09)
- ($30,462.687.09) ($211,91 I ,1182.33)
-
FY 95 FY 99 ~FY 04
- FY 05 FY 06
- $5,138,103.25 :;·~4S,679,203.711
- ($4 ,700,073.60· $5.7115003.63 $5,1113.481.32
533.4 I 0,900.48 $32.9~ 163.969.40 55.262 388.79 ($5,362,776.56
- - ,995.301.93) (530,462.687.09 $29,911,982.33
--+ ... ... ... -- ... .
- - - - - - ~
'" 8 ;; N 8 ~ '" 8
'" 0 0
p------p j) ~ Ð ~
u. u. u. u. u.
I
/
!
í
.~/
~-_.
oj
81671 828961 illlli
=:t -
-+ --
12766 129571 : 143453
=c -
I -
9865 iõõi3r iiõ8šõ
I
I
,
538.00 $38.00 I
522.00 $22.00 I
521.00 521.00 I
!
,
I
$3103..87.08 53, I 50 0311.38 I 533.728.!
$210850.88 5285063.64 I $2913,9
5207 156.54 5210.263.89 I $2,1411.3
5SO.000.00 $50,000.00 I $550 0
52.1535011.14 52.218114.41 5111.488.5
55.7115.003.63 $5,1113,.81.32
12577
97111
FY
99
H611
11675
11022
538.00
$22.00
$21.00
$2,7116,325.00
$253,054.17
$186,653.511
550,000.00
$1,751,000.00
55,037,032.76
52,755,000.00
52411,314.45
SI83,895.16
550,000.00
$ I ,700.000.00
54.1138,2011.6
$4.242,700.00
$245,630.00
5181.177.50
$50,000.00
with 3% increase annual
Projected Revenue
MSW R.......
CDD R........
Wood Wastt Revenue
Othtt Revenue
S1..mlElec Revenue
Total Revenue
---- Total Revenue
-0-- Total Expenditur..
-- Re$erve a1 End 01 FY
(Rev-Ex!'s)
FY
98
73588
" 502
8888
$38.00
$22.00
$21.00
Costs
.ø
'"
>
u.
FY
97
72500
332
8757
$38.00
$22.00
$21.00
OEeratin9- Bud!let
FY
$10,000,000.00
$5,000,000.00
$0.00
~\
0';\
($5.000,000.00) >\,
u..
:510.000.000.00)
:$15.000.000.00)
($20,000,000.00)
($25,000.000.00)
(530.000,000.00)
($35,000,000.00)
540,000.000.00)
FY
650
65
8628
$38.00
$22.00
rn:õõ
roy.mant.
Po.t Clotur. car.
Total Expenditures
Starting Reserve
Reserve at End of
T gal Revenue
T otel Expenditures
Reserve .1 End of FY
96
FY
95
10000
~
10000
~
~
11000
8500
1.50%
8500
illÆ.Q.
522.00
$21.00
1m
FOf The Chari
FY
Waste Stream
Tipping Fees
MSW
CDD
Wood West.
Projected
e;¡;¡;;;ë
~
To\lllO,
1101
Ca
Net
· ~1 .
Tattef8~ Farm
531 TattershaDFannLane
Owtottesvme. Vtrginia229IB
e-maß:dwb5f8plen.med.vlrglnla.edu
PhII04-97t -5564
SepteanbeJ9,1995
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesvil1e, Virginia 22902-4596
Attn.: Board of Supetvisors: Ms, Ella Carey, Oerk of Board of Supetvisors
Re: Ivy Landfil1: Official Agenda September 6, 1995, Item 14
Dear Ella:
During the Board of Supetvisors meeting of September 6, 1995 the RSW A presented
Item 14 "Solid Waste Alternatives". I would like to obtain a copy of the material
actuaJly presented to the Board of Supetvisors With regard to this issue, along WIth
any response provided by the Board. I would appreciate your help with this matter.
Sincerely
Q0~~
David Booth
The Steertng Committee of Ivy
/~
~. ·~.W~~-ý Ø~~/(/Þ
~"~~r ~
j?5; /;?/t:: ~¡:'/
~
;?P;/f1'/~/P
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
EXECUTIVE SESSION MOTION
I MOVE THAT THE BOARD GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 2. I -344(A) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
UNDER SUBSECTION ( I ) TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTERS
REGARDING APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS; UNDER
SUBSECTION (3) TO DISCUSS THE DISPOSITION OF REAL
PROPERTY RELATING TO POSSIBLE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS; AND
UNDER SUBSECTION (7) TO DISCUSS WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND
~fo(Jft.
STAFF::¡::we SPECIFIC LEGAL MATTERS, ONE REGARDING AN
o...!
INSURANCE ISSUE)AND ANOTHER REGARDING THE NEGOTIATION OF
A CONTRACT, ~ o.....,~ (l t 6Ai.D¡/'~ I... ý>~¡vl;) I ¡..J ~ t..t'Il~A-rlo^' c::.,....c.o!:A,v'..uf.
Pr "2."tJ ""~ 1~S'u6 J AiJl) o,..¿ It.éGMDI^' (:. (UVi:tts,o.... I SSIJ~S'.
090695B.WPD
'"
"
Dislnh¡,;ted io ßo¡rd: ,,?:./-,Ji?....5"
---....--.~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLfiemt. Item ~. ~~'¿(6Q
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
.~', ' ......., .. , , .
L~ :.:', ;":;<.-0 '-} ~;~. ..~ ':'..." :~ '~~.,,_..;<:..' )';'~::.rl\r,' "r{~;
ON
-~~-~..~.~-." "-'_"""_'~~""""'" .'_'R_'_~_..~__
AGENDA TITLE:
Resolution to Amend Certain Pennit & Inspection Fees
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Request to Amend Pennit & Inspection Fees on County Owned
Projects
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Huff and Hurt
REVIEWED BY:
~.../~
~..~
(
A'ITACHMENTS: Yes
BACKGROUND:
Staffhas recently conducted a QuIP planning session with all the various departments involved in handling CIP projects. The purpose of this
meeting was to identüy ways to work together on all aspects :trom plan review and site inspections to bidding and project management in order
to more efficiently handle the workload on CIP projects.
One of the recommendations that came out of this review was to eliminate the payment of inspection fees on all county funded projects. As
it cWTently stands, all projects are required to pay the Building Pennit fees associated with construction projects. On Sutherland Middle School,
as an example, this amounted to approximately $13,000. The recommendation to eliminate the payment of these fees is based on the following:
(1) The fees are built into the contractor's bid which the county is paying with borrowed funds and subjecting itself to interest for 20 years
on these pennit fees.
(2) Each subcontractor is responsible for the fees associated with hislher portion of the work which is then marked up by the general
contractor and passed along to the County.
(3) It is easily remedied by indicating on bid docwnents that the owner will be responsible for all permit fees.
As you know, staff will be involved with approximately $40 million in school projects over the next three years. Given this volwne of work,
staff recommends that fees not be collected on any project owned by Albemarle County or Albemarle County Schools. This recommendation
appears to be consistent with the practice of many other localities and is felt to be fiscally prudent.
Staff is sensitive to the drop in collected revenues that this recommendation will cause and may mean that expenditures could exceed revenues
for the first time since 1986 in the Inspections Department. Since the payment of fees was a paper transfer anyway, there is no negative impact
on the overall fmancial condition of revenues and will clearly save the County money in interest charges and contractor markups.
DISCUSSION:
The second issue that arises :trom this discussion is whether to waive fees for projects not owned by the County but that may have fmancial
participation :trom the County involved. Examples would include the upcoming construction on the Crozet pool, the recent construction by
MACAA, Fire & Rescue buildings which may include community centers (East Rivanna Fire Station), etc. The difficulty in considering these
projects for eligibility is defining the limits of who should be included. There are a tremendous nwnber of nonprofit organizations in our
community that are all serving very useful purposes. The difference in these types of requests and those owned by the County is that there is
no true revenue loss in those projects owned by the County, whereas there would be for others. We will still need to provide the same level
of inspections for both types of projects. Once opened up to others, it will be very difficult to define who should be exempt and who should
not, and why.
·
Agenda Title: Resolution to Amend Certain Permit & Inspection Fees
September 6, 1995
Page 2 of2
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached resolution to eliminate all permit and inspections related fees for projects owned by
Albemarle C01.mty or Albemarle COWlty Schools. Section 5-3 of the COWlty Code provides for this amendment by resolution or amending the
ordinance and staff feels that a resolution will meet the needs at this time.
95.133
..
RESOLUTION
TO AMEND CERTAIN
PERMIT AND INSPECTION FEES
WHEREAS, section 5-3 of the Albemarle County Code prescribes fees required to be paid for permits and inspections for
new construction or other building operations; and
WHEREAS, the County Code further provides that such fees prescribed in section 5-3 may be amended by resolution of
the Board of Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has determined that the efficient operation of government and good financial
management requires the elimination of all fees for construction projects owned by Albemarle County or the
Albemarle County Public School System.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, hereby amends
section 5-3 of the Albemarle County Code by resolution to eliminate all permit and inspection fees for new
construction or building operations for any construction project owned by Albemarle County or the Albemarle
County Public School System.
C:\WPWIN60\DOCS\BEV\95-133.WPD
'.
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
R ivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
MEMO TO:
To Whom Addressed
DATE:
September 8, 1995
~w,~
~
FROM:
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC
SUBJECT:
Resolution Adopted by the Board on September 6, 1995
Attached for your use is a copy of a resolution which was adopted by the Board
on September 6, 1995:
"
(1) A resolution to amend certain permit and inspection fees set out in
Section 5-3 of the Code of Albemarle. This action eliminates all permit
and inspection fees for new construction or building operations for any
construction project owned by Albemarle County or the Albemarle County
Public School System.
EWC:len
Attachment (1)
cc: Stephen Helvin
Jesse Hurt
Jo Higgins
Municipal Code
~
*
Printed on recycled paper
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
TO AMEND CERTAIN
PERMIT AND INSPECTION FEES
WHEREAS, Section 5-3 of the Code of Albemarle prescribes
fees required to be paid for permits and inspections for new
construction or other building operations; and
WHEREAS, the Code of Albemarle further provides that such
fees prescribed in Section 5-3 may be amended by resolution of
the Board of Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the efficient opera-
tion of government and good financial management requires the
elimination of all fees for construction projects owned by
Albemarle County or the Albemarle County Public School System.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, hereby amends Section
5-3 of the Code of Albemarle by resolution to eliminate all
permit and inspection fees for new construction or building
operations for any construction project owned by Albemarle County
or the Albemarle County Public School System.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously
adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, at a regular meeting held on September 6, 1995.
Clerk~ o~:::~perVisors
.øL/
,,~ ~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
eAl
~ "
"...
*
!mñi
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Oistrì~uted to Boifd:L -/.¿'...:s--
.. ltern No. ~~ ¡;'/
AGENDA TITLE:
Shooting Near Residences
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Review of policy options for prohibiting discharging of flreanns
near or adjacent to populated areas
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
~
(
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Mr. Tucker. Mr. Huff. and Mr. Davis
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
Some time ago, staffhad been requested to look into the issue of discharging flreanns in and around subdivisions and other occupied dwellings.
Subsequent to that request, staff shared that Game Warden, Kenny Dove, had indicated a high degree of skepticism at the ability to enforce such
a regulation as well as difficulties in defining areas that shooting would be prohibited.
DISCUSSION:
Following that input. staffhas done additional research which is attached. Section 13-9 of the cmrent County Code makes it unlawful to
discharge any firearm within the boundaries of any County residential district as designated by zoning classification. The enabling legislation
for this code section actually allows the County to ban shooting of :firearms, air or gas operated weapons in any area so heavily populated as
to make such conduct dangerous (§ 15.1-518 Code of Virginia. as amended).
Section 15.1-518.1 of the Code of Virginia. as amended. allows counties to prohibit hunting with:firearms or other weapons within one half
mile of any subdivision oc other area which is so heavily populated as to make hunting dangerous. Signs are required to be erected designating
such boundaries. A survey of urbanizing counties reveals an apparent reluctance to incorporate this half-mile regulation, presumably due to
the difficulty in erecting sufficient signage to designate the boundaries.
Staffœi County does make it uoIawful to shoot within one hundred (100 yards) of any regularly occupied structure without written permission
of its owner or occupant. This is apparently done under the enabling legislation of section 15.1-518 of the Code of Virginia which does not
require the signage provision of 15.1-518.1. This appears to be the best solution to the issue of attempting to restrict discharging firearms
adjacent to districts zoned residential.
.As with any ordinaoœ. enfoccement is the key to an effective solution to a problem. A requirement that prohibits discharging a firearm within
a set distance of an occupied dwelling is coosistent with our current prohibition of the same within 50 feet of a highway and would be enforced
with the same resources. Hunter education will be. as always, an important element of addressing this issue should we move fOlWard. This
same Amendment could be written to include air or gas powered weapons if the Board so chooses.
RECOMMENDATION:
Given this information, staffwould be happy to move forward on this issue if the Board is so inclined. A resolution of intent to hold a public
hearing would be the necess&I}' step if further action is warranted and may be useful in gauging the interest in such a regulation.
95.136
firearm. wpd
,r
*
~
,
...
§ 15.1-5:
§ 15.1
may reg\
may reg \
do so an
(Code 1~'
¡
i
!
; ~
:~
f
§ ~517 CODE OF VIRGINIA
jurisdi . on to try cases arising t~ereunder to th~ s3;me e nt as criminal
cases ari . g in the county or CIty. All fines paId In ch cases shall be
disposed of the court as prescnbed by § 14.1-44. . .
The provisions fthis section shall not be deemed affect the apphcatlOn of
§§ 46.1-551 and 1-552. (Code 1950, § 15-6.1; 952, c. 472; 1962, c. 623;
1964, c. 245.)
§ 15.l
§ 15.1
authori 1
supervI"
as the I
CommOI
pursua n
ordinan\
46.1-19:·
regulati
vehicle"
uniform
eqUlpm(
Commol
and pro'
boards (
signals.
by the
confern
be exer,
agreem'
In th'
supervI
the sam
in som,
enactm'
hereof,
becomE-
superVJ
cc. 405
itor's note. - Section 14.1-44, referred to
the next-to-Iast paragraph, was repealed by
Acts 1972. c. 708 and Acts 1973, c. 546.
§ 15.1-517. Regulation of eping animals and fowl. - Any county
may, whenever in the jud ent of the oard of supervisors the same is
necessary for the preser~ ion of public he th, regulate by ordinance the
keeping of animals or fì , other than dogs and ts, within a certain distance
of residences or othe uildings or wells, springs, treams, creeks, or brooks,
and provide that a or certain of such animals shall be kept within certain
areas. (Code 195 , §§ 15-20.1, 15-20.2; 1952, c. 694; 19 c. 94; 1962, c. 623.)
§ 15.1-5 .1. Regulation of sale of animals procure from animal
shelters - Any city, county or town which supports, in whole in part, an
anim shelter may by ordinance provide that no person who a uires an
ani al from such shelter shall be able to sell such animal within a p . od of
s' months from the time the animal is acquired from the shelter. Violati of
uch an ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor. (1972, c. 347.)
§ 15.1-518. Prohibiting shooting of firearms, air-operated or gas-
operated weapons in certain areas. - Any county may provide against the
shooting of firearms or air-operated or gas-operated weapons in any areas of
the county which are in the opinion of the board of supervisors so heavily
populated as to make such conduct dangerous to the inhabitants thereof.
(Code 1950, § 15-20.3; 1954, c. 223; 1962, c. 623; 1968, c. 294.)
§ 15.1-518.1. Prohibiting hunting in certain areas. - The governing
body of any county may by ordinance prohibit all hunting with firearms or
other weapons in, or within one-half mile of, any subdivision or other area of
such county which, in the opinion of the governing body, is so heavily
populated as to make such hunting dangerous to the inhabitants thereof, Any
such ordinance shall clearly describe each area in which hunting is
prohibited, and shall further provide that appropriate signs shall be erected
designating said boundaries thereof. (Code 1950, § 15-20.3:1; 1962, c. 163.)
Law H
cial dist J
Rev. 11~
ment L;,
Rich. L
This,
power (,
countie!'
powers \
cities aI,
206 Va
under t!
amendn·
Only I
ties ine!
certain,
confern·
law. Bo.
142 S
sectIOn
ments.
The number of this section was assigned
by the Virginia Code Commission, the number
in the 1962 act having been 15-20.3: 1.
.1-519. Regulation of horse riding schools. - Any c y may by
ordinan ovide for the licensing, inspecting and regul . n of horse riding
schools for t rpose of preventing any violati § 3.1-796.122 of the
Code of Virginia or an: local ordinance 0 . llar import.
For the purposes of this s rse riding school" shall mean any
establishment operated for pro co ion with which one or more horses
are let for hire to be rid or driven, either WI ·thout the furnishing of
riding or driving i ructions. (Code 1950, § 15-20.4; ,. 461; 1960, c.
359; 1962, c. .)
320
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE':
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- I
AGENDA TITLE:
Year End Adjustments and Reappropriations
AGENDA DATE:
September 6, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
Distributeå '10 Bo.ud ~-¡/- ~r
Arenda ~t~~~f~"
ACTION: X
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Request approval of Appropriations #940073, #940074, #95017,
#95018 for General Fund operations and the Capital Improvements
Program.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATIACHMENTS:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Breeden
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
Based on staffs annual review of projects and operations at fiscal year end, this report is provided to advise you of the County's fmancial status
as of June 30, 1995. Approval is being requested for expenditures and projects that require adjustments at year end or span fiscal years.
DISCUSSION:
FINANCIAL STATUS: The County continues to remain in sound fmancial condition. General Fund operations for FY 94/95 resulted in a
surplus of approximately $2.8 million. This results from revenues exceeding projections by $1.8 million and expenditures being less than
appropriated by $1 million (savings). Revenues exceeded projections in the following areas:
Real Estate Tax $ 288,000
Personal Property Tax 875,000
Sales Tax 498,000
Investments 797,000
Other Revenues (658.000)
Total. . . . .. $1.800.000
School operations resulted in a surplus of approximately $0.5 million primarily as a result of a reduction in expenditures. Please keep in mind
that these amounts are preliminary and subject to minor adjustments. Audited results will be presented to you in the near future.
FY 94/95 OVEREXPENDlTURES: Overexpenditures were incurred in several General Fund operations totaling $80,500 and are detailed
on attached Appropriation Form #940073. Justification for the major items are as follows:
CIRCUIT COURT ($8600) - Primarily due to the payment of accwnulated leave resulting from the retirement of Ms. Jean Easton.
MAGISTRATE ($1600) - The forced relocation of the office resulted in a substantial rent payment.
SHERIFF ($66.500) - Additional staff approved for the Town of Scottsville and a substantial increase in provision of security at
private events. This overexpenditure was largely offset by additional funding from the State Compensation Board and fees charged
for the private security.
DISTRICT HOME ($2.450) - Increased usage exceeded budget projection. This expense is basically outside the County's control
and often difficult to project.
An overexpenditure was also incwred in the Capital Improvement Fund on two projects as detailed on attached Appropriation Form #940074.
These projects can be covered by a transfer from a completed project with a surplus balance.
.
.
AGENDA TITLE:
Year End Adjustments and Reappropriations
September 6, 1995
Page 2
REAPPROPIUATION: Requests have been received fTom nwnerous departments for funds fTom FY 94/95 to be reappropriated for
expenditures inFY 95/96. The total General Fund request is $482,437.72. These requests can be summarized in 3 categories:
1) Purchases made in FY 94/95 for which the goods
or services had not be received or finalized as
ofJune 30,1995. (#95017)
$ 80,965.75
2) Projects funded in FY 94/95 which were in progress
but not completed as of June 30, 1995. (#95018)
$229,372.97
3) Projects or equipment needed for various operations
which were not funded in the FY 95/96 Budget or needs
that have been identified since adoption of the
FY 95/96 Budget. (#95018)
$172,099.00
Capital hnprovement projects have also been reviewed and show a total $4,649,329.40 in projects still in process, but uncompleted as ofJWle
30, 1995. As recommended by the COWlty Auditors, the Capital FWld will be split into two funds for FY 95/96. Attached Appropriation Fonn
#95015 provides the details of WlCOIIlpleted school projects totaling $853,103.08. Attached Appropriation F onn #95016 provides the details
ofWlcompleted General Fund projects totaling $3,796,226.32. All project balances requested for reappropriation are the amounts unexpended
as of JWle 30, 1995 with one exception. Based on the revised cost savings for Berkmar Drive $150,000 is requested to be transferred fTom the
Berkmar project to the Avon Street/Route 20 Connector project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is of the opinion that these requests are justified and recommends approval. Additional adjustments will likely need to be requested based
on the final closing ofFY 94/95 operations. However, this action covers the major items needed for continuation ofFY 95/96 operations in
an orderly manner. Staff will be present at your meeting to provide any details you may require for this request.
YEAR_END.WPD
95.150
, .
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
94/95
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
YES
NO
GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FISCAL YEAR FY 94/95 OVEREXPENDITURES.
940073
x
x
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100012013601700
1100021010601700
1100021030700003
1100031020110000
1100031020129900
1100031020210000
1100031020221000
1100031020270000
1100031020600800
1100031020800501
1100041021332300
1100059000563000
COMMUNITY SVCS
CIRCUIT COURT
MAGISTRATE
SHERIFF
COPY SUPPLIES
SALARIES
RENT
SALARIES
OVERTIME-REIMBURSABLE
FICA
RETIREMENT
WORKERS COMP
VEHICLE OPERATION
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
$1,050.00
8,600.00
1,600.00
27,650.00
26,850.00
2,050.00
2,250.00
1,150.00
2,250.00
4,300.00
300.00
2,450.00
$80,500.00
2100051000510100
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
STREET SIGNS
DISTRICT HOME
TOTAL
FUND BALANCE
TOTAL
$80,500.00
************************************************************************
$80,500.00
APPROVALS:
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SIGNATURE
~;;~
~.
DATE
ß-y/-?S
~-?~,J
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
94/95
NUMBER
940074
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
CAPITAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FISCAL YEAR FY 94/95 OVEREXPENDITURES.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1900060100800705
1900062420800673
1900060100950013
SCHOOL BOARD COMPUTER CABLING
SCHOOL BOARD HVAC IMPROVEMENTS
FACILITIES MAINTSTOP SWITCHES
$14,200.41
533.00
(14,733.41)
$0.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
TOTAL
$0.00
TOTAL
$0.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
FINANCE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
//P~ -d'.....
~~ ~~~
/ß~
~..j/-9>
f?-7'--?,5
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
95/96
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
YES
NO
CIP-SCHOOL
95015
x
x
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATIONS FOR SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FROM FY 94/95.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1900060100800664
1900060100800665
1900060100950014
1900060100950042
1900060100950087
1900060205950021
1900060210800605
1900060210800901
1900060215312300
1900060255312350
1900060255800200
1900060255800605
1900060255800740
1900060301312350
1900060301800605
1900060301800901
1900060301800903
1900060302800901
1900060303312350
1900060303800901
1900060304312350
1900060410800605
1900060510800901
1900061101800700
1900062190800700
1900064010800700
1900064010800710
SCHOOL BOARD
SCHOOL BOARD
SCHOOL BOARD
SCHOOL BOARD
SCHOOL BOARD
HOLLYMEAD
STONE ROBINSON
STONE ROBINSON
AGNOR-HURT
SUTHERLAND
SUTHERLAND
SUTHERLAND
SUTHERLAND
ALBEMARLE
ALBEMARLE
ALBEMARLE
ALBEMARLE
W. ALBEMARLE
MURRAY EDUC.
MURRAY EDUC.
NEW HIGH SCHOOL
C.A.T.E.C
VEHICLE MAINT.
CLASS/INST
ADM. -TECHN
DEPT OF ED
DEPT OF ED
SECURITY SYSTEMS
ADA STRUCTURAL CHANGE
SOIL MONITORING
UNDERGROUND STORAGE T
ENERGY MANAGEMENT
FOLDING WALL
CONSTRUCTION
RENOVATIONS
PROF. SER. ARCHITECTU
ENGINEERING/PLANNING
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
CONSTRUCTION
LAB EQUIPMENT
ENGINEERING/PLANNING
CONSTRUCTION
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
ASBESTOS REMOVAL
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
ENGINEERING/PLANNING
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
ENGINEERING/PLANNING
CONSTRUCTION
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
ADP EQUIPMENT
ADP EQUIPMENT
ADP EQUIPMENT
ADP-SOFTWARE
TOTAL
$75,692.32
115,592.19
7,622.50
76,535.00
21,161.53
355.97
1,200.00
25,000.00
17,280.00
680.47
59,471.03
32,173.03
600.00
17,310.08
3,336.35
550.00
4,798.75
10,153.04
205.84
3,156.53
37,114.52
7,783.75
306,221.75
10,127.37
1,210.06
12,214.00
5,557.00
$853,103.08
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
95/96
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
YES
NO
CIP-GENERAL
95016
x
x
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATIONS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FROM FY 94/95.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1901012140950004
1901012200800301
1901012200800700
1901021050331000
1901031010950005
1901031040312703
1901031040950085
1901032010800510
1901032010800710
1901032010950092
1901033020700002
1901033020800665
1901041000800960
1901041000800961
1901041000800962
1901041000800963
1901041000800964
1901041000950011
1901041000950022
1901041000950035
1901041000950039
1901041000950059
1901041000950072
1901041000950073
1901041000950090
1901041000950091
1901041020950036
1901041020950051
1901041020950065
1901041020950081
1901041020950098
1901043100580411
1901043100800665
1901043100800666
1901043100800901
1901051020800901
1901051020950095
1901071000800665
1901071000800668
1901071000950003
1901071000950006
FINANCE
INFO. SERVICES
INFO. SERVICES
JUVENILE CT.
POLICE DEPT.
EMERGENCY SER.
EMERGENCY SER.
FIRE DEPART.
FIRE DEPART.
FIRE DEPART.
CORRECTION
CORRECTION
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
STREET IMP
STREET IMP
STREET IMP
STREET IMP
STREET IMP
COUNTY OFFICE
COUNTY OFFICE
COUNTY OFFICE
COUNTY OFFICE
HEALTH DEPT.
HEALTH DEPT.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
PARKS & REC.
ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
COMMUNICATION EQUIP-R
ADP EQUIPMENT
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
SATELLITE RECEIVERS
E-911 LOCATOR SYSTEM
E911 JOINT CITY/COUNT
SERVICE VEHICLES-NEW
DATA PROCESSING SOFTW
FIRE HOUSE
REGIONAL JAIL
ADA STRUCTURAL CHANGE
STREET LIGHTS
ST. LTS.HYDRAU./COMMO
ST.LTS. HYDRAU/GEORGE
ST LTS-WHITEWOOD/GEOR
ST LTS-GEORGTN/COMMON
HYDRAULIC ROAD SIDEWA
ASPHALT PATH-GEORGETO
NORTH BERKSHIRE ROAD
MEADOWCREEK PARKWAY E
KEENE LANDFILL CLOSUR
PARK ROAD EXTENSION
SIDEWALK-FIFTH STREET
IVY ROAD
BARRACKS RD SIDEWALK
BERKMAR DRIVE EXTENDE
AVON ST RT 20 CONNECT
COMMONWEALTH DRIVE
REVENUE SHARING ROADS
MECHUMS WEST
ADA COMPLIANCE
ADA STRUCTURAL CHANGE
FACILITY MAINT.
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
BUILDING RENOVATIONS
HEALTH DEPT-NEW WING
ADA STRUCTURAL CHANGE
ADA CHANGES-SCHOOLS
CROZET PARK IMPROVEME
CROZET/GREENWOOD FLD
$150,000.00
1,875.24
14,030.60
4,528.45
245,900.00
179,056.32
714,474.49
9,100.00
24,060.00
150,000.00
207,107.28
35,250.00
40,000.00
16,000.00
16,000.00
12,000.00
16,000.00
32,817.89
13,000.00
3,800.00
109,060.75
376,976.35
41,000.00
78,000.00
1,667.00
11,000.00
252,475.91
220,700.00
650.00
11,107.90
3,071.00
65,940.81
42,435.05
17,930.00
17,122.98
2,690.00
12,444.22
197,827.80
93,375.80
518.70
1,806.85
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
95/96
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
FUND
GENERAL
95017
x
x
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATIONS FOR GENERAL FUND ENCUMBERANCES FROM FY 94/95.
EXPENDITURE
COST CTR/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100011010800710
1100012010350000
1100012141800200
1100012141800700
1100012142800100
1100012142800201
1100012142800700
1100012143800200
1100012143800201
1100012143800700
1100012144800700
1100012145800201
1100012145800700
1100031011800100
1100031020600900
1100041000312700
1100042040390010
1100043002331200
1100043002332200
1100043003800101
1100053012301212
1100081010312700
1100081010350000
1100081010800100
BOARD OF SUPV. ADP SOFTWARE
COUNTY EXEC. PRINTING & BINDING
FINANCE-ADM. FURN. & FIXTURES
FINANCE-ADM. ADP EQUIPMENT
FINANCE-ASSESS. MAC. & EQUIP.
FINANCE-ASSESS. FURN. & FIXTURES
FINANCE-ASSESS. ADP EQUIPMENT
FINANCE-ACCT. FURN. & FIXTURES
FINANCE-ACCT. FURN. & FIXTURES-REPL
FINANCE-ACCT. ADP EQUIPMENT
FINANCE-REAL EST.ADP EQUIPMENT
FINANCE-PURC. FURN. & FIXTURES-REPL
FINANCE-PURC. ADP EQUIPMENT
POLICE-MGT. MAC. & EQUIP.
SHERIFF VEHICLE SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING PROF. SER.-CONSULTANT
SOLID WASTE CURBSIDE RECYCLING
STAFF SERVICES R&M EQUIP/BLDG
STAFF SERVICES MAINT. CONTRACTS
STAFF SERVICES MAC. & EQUIP.-REPL
VPA BENEFITS F.S. ISSUANCE-CONTR
PLANNING PROF. SER.-CONSULTANT
PLANNING PRINTING & BINDING
PLANNING MAC. & EQUIP.
TOTAL
$690.00
3,600.00
128.33
3,393.00
650.00
2,866.33
12,131.00
158.00
4,030.66
6,932.00
3,048.00
212.00
6,957.00
215.32
359.48
293.80
9,422.00
7,186.00
1,000.00
605.55
6,027.44
7,919.84
2,840.00
300.00
$80,965.75
FISCAL YEAR
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
95/96
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
FUND
NUMBER
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
YES
NO
GENERAL
95018
x
x
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATIONS FOR GENERAL FUND PROJECTS FROM FY 94/95 CARRYOVER.
EXPENDITURE
COST CTR/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100013020130000
1100013020320000
1100013020520100
1100013020800100
1100021020601200
1100021060120000
1100021060312800
1100021060331100
11000210603321.00
11.00021.060350200
1.1.00021.060350300
1.1.00021.0605201.00
1.1.00021.0606001.03
11.00021.0608001.01.
1.1.00021.060800200
110002201.08001.00
1.1.0002201.0800200
1.1.00031.01.1.1.20000
1.1.00031.01.331.0000
1.1.00031.01.331.1.000
1.1.00031.01.3601.1.01.
1.1.00031.01.38001.00
1.1.00031.01.3800300
1.1.00041.000800700
1.1.00041.00080071.0
11.00041.000950023
1.1.00042040390001.
1.1.00043002331.200
1.1.0005301.2800201.
1.1.0005301.3800201.
1.1.0005301.41.1.0000
11.0005301.421.0000
1.1.0005301.4221.000
1.1.0005301.4231.000
11.0005301.4232000
1.1.0005301.4241.000
1.1.0005301.4270000
11.0005301.4550400
1.1.000530146001.00
1.1.0005301.4800200
1.1.0005301.4800700
BOARD OF ELEC.
GENL DISTRICT CT
CLERK OF COURT
COMM. ATTORNEY
POLICE-MGT.
POLICE-PATROL
ENGINEERING
SOLID WASTE
STAFF SERVICES
VPA-BENEFITS
VPA-SERVICES
PiT WAGES
TEMP. HELP SERVICE
POSTAL SERVICES
MACH. & EQUIP.
BOOKS & SUBSC.
OVERTIME WAGES
PROF. SER.-AUDIT
R&M-OFF. EQUIP
MAINT. CONTRACTS
BINDING OF RECORDS
INDEXING SERVICE
POSTAL SERVICE
RECORD BOOKS
MAC. & EQUIP-REPL
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
MAC. & EQUIP.
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
OVERTIME WAGES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
HEALTH SERVICES
UNIFORMS-NEW
MAC. & EQUIP.
COMMUNICATION EQUIP.
ADP EQUIP
ADP SOFTWARE
AUTOMART-ROAD BOND
KEENE LANDFILL
REPAIR & MAINT.
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
SALARIES-REGULAR
FICA
RETIREMENT
HEALTH INSURANCE
DENTAL INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
TRA VEL- EDUC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
ADP-EQUIPMENT
$754.85
688.05
1.,61.2.01.
8,250.00
3,200.00
2,000.00
528.18
500.00
304.00
209.88
3,200.00
300.00
600.00
3,500.00
1.0,000.00
400.00
900.00
20,000.00
5,000.00
4,080.00
8,400.00
4,000.00
30,000.00
3,000.00
1,200.00
1.6,970.00
1.50,000.00
9,000.00
1.,000.00
1.,000.00
34,1.63.00
2,61.3.00
2,979.00
1.,740.00
60.00
1.20.00
50.00
2,000.00
500.00
1.,000.00
2,500.00
· "', ..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Finance
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 229024596
Telephone (804) 296·5855
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
County Department Heads, Jackson Zimmermann
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance ~
August 11, 1995
Reappropriations
It's that time again. As most of you are aware, any appropriated funds unexpended as of
June 30 of the fiscal year revert back to the respective fund balance. These funds are no longer
available for expenditure without additional action by the Board of Supervisors (reappropriation).
This office will automatically request reappropriations for all purchase orders
encumbered but not paid as of June 30, 1995. We will also automatically request reappropriation
for all Capital Improvement projects unless we are aware of a completed project or the
responsible department advises that a project can be eliminated or reduced. These items do not
need to be included in your request.
Please keep in mind that reappropriations are only for projects or items that were covered
in your FY 1994/95 budget that were either not completed as of June 30, 1995 or not purchased
and/or received by that date. Any requests to use unexpended funds for a new or expanded
project in FY 1995/96 should be requested in a separate memorandum with appropriate
information and justification.
All requests should be sent to this office no later than Tuesday, August 22,1995;
requests for new or expanded projects in FY 1995/96 will be forwarded to the County
Executive's Office for review similar to the budget process. Those departments who have
already submitted requests should review the requests based on these guidelines.
All departments with FY 1994/95 Capital Improvement projects are requested to review
the projects' current status and advise if any unexpended funds are no longer required or if the
amount required for completion is less than the current unex:pel).ded balance.
Please feel free to give me a call at 296-5855 (x. 3126) if you have any questions.
MABlbs
cc: Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
Ed Koonce
FAX (804) 9724006 TOO (804, 9724012
David P. Bowennan
Charlolfesvil1e
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hðll
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
MEMO TO:
FROM:
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC~Ø~
September 8, 1995 ~
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Appropriations Approved on September 6, 1995
At the Board's meeting on September 6, 1995, the following appropriations were
approved to cover FY 1994-95 overexpenditures:
Appropriation Form #940073 for funding of FY 1994-95 General Fund overexpendi-
tures in the amount of $80,500.00.
Appropriation Form #940074 for funding 1994-95 Capital Fund over expenditures
in the amount of $14,733.41.
EWC:len
Attachments (2)
c: Lee Catlin
Circuit Court
Magistrate
Terry Hawkins
Jo Higgins
Roxanne White
Kevin Castner
*
Printed on recycled paper
David P. Bowennan
Charlot lesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivanll,1
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkms
Whirl? Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scotlsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel MineT
MEMO TO:
Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance
FROM:
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ~ ø ~~
September 8, 1995 ~-~
Appropriations Approved on September 6, 1995
DATE:
SUBJECT:
At the Board's meeting on September 6, 1995, the following reappropriations
were approved:
Appropriation Form #95015 for funding of School Capital Improvement Projects
from FY 1994-95 in the amount of $853,103.08.
Appropriation Form #95016 for funding of Capital Improvement Projects from FY
1994-95 in the amount of $3,796,226.32.
Appropriation Form #95017 for funding of General Fund Encumbrances from FY
1994-95 in the amount of $80,965.75.
Appropriation Form #95018 for funding of General Fund Projects from the FY
1994-95 Carryover Balance in the amount of $401,471.97.
EWC:len
Attachments (4)
c:
Kevin Castner
Melvin Breeden
Fred Kruger
Juvenile Court
John Miller
Wayne Campagna
Carl Pumphrey
Al Tumminia
Jo Higgins
Al Waughman
Susan McLeod
Pat Mullaney
Donna Selle
Wayne Cilimberg
Ella Carey
Roxanne White
v-Mê"lvin Breeden
Terry Hawkins
Karen Morris
Jim Heilman
Sterling Hudson
Shelby Marshall
James Camblos
Virginia McDonald
Amelia McCulley
Bob McKinley
*
Printed on recycled paper
.../ \-1.
~ 5t? ~;:Jb /¿:? Y
David P. Bowennan
O1arlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
September 8, 1995
Charles S. Martin
Rivann.a
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scoltsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miner
Mr. William L. Lukhard, Chair
Advisory Committee on Aging, Disability and Long-term Care Services
c/o Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services
600 East Broad Street, Suite 1300
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Dear Mr. Lukhard:
We would first like to recognize and commend the Advisory Committee for its work and dedication in
tackling a difficult and complex task. Trying to make recommendations that will suit the many diverse
regions of Virginia has been the charge of many committees before you and we recognize the inherent
difficulties of this task.
The County of Albemarle acknowledges the fragmented service delivery for long-term care services that
exists at the state and local level and recognizes the importance of a well coordinated service system for
those citizens in Albemarle county who are in need oflong term care. However, we also recognize that one
of the four major directives from the General Assembly to the Advisory Committee was that "any changes in
the delivery system not shift costs to localities or require any unfunded mandates". It is primarily within this
directive that Albemarle County would like to share our concerns with Recommendation # 1 of the report.
In response to Recommendation # 1 of the report: "Each local governing body, or combination thereof,
should identify and support a mechanism to provide a network of connected, collaborative care planning,
authorizing and delivery entities which have comprehensive responsibility for consumer outcomes",
Albemarle County has the following concerns:
· The term "identify and SUDDort" could be interpreted to indicate financial support, not only for the newly
created mechanism, but for the implied responsibilities of identification, planning, and implementation of
long-term care services. The recommendation is not clear on this point. Although the County
acknowledges its responsibility to provide information to its citizens at the local level, Albemarle feels
strongly that the delivery, funding and regulatory oversight of long term care services should continue to
be the responsibility of the state
· The ambiguity of the term "should identify and support a mechanism" again implies that the County
must, or is mandated to have, a collaborative mechanism in place. The County suggests that the
*
Printed on recycled paper
establishment of a local mechanism should be an option for those localities that wish to administer
long tenn care, similar to the option now given to jurisdictions to localize health departments.
. The coordinating mechanism for long-tenn care, similar to the Community Policy and Management
Teams mandated by the Community Services Act, will be put into place with a stated assumption
that localities or member agencies will share the burden of any administrative costs. If the CPMT is
the model for the recommended coordinating mechanism, and it seems to be, CPMT administrative
costs across the state in staff time, financial accounting and paper work have been substantial. To
imply that no additional costs will be incurred by the localities to coordinate and administer
long-tenn care services is naive, particularly in light of the CPMT experience.
In summary, Albemarle County's major concerns center on the additional coordination, service delivery
and oversight responsibilities that are implicit in the committee's recommendations, however well
intentioned. Therefore, Albemarle County recommends that these local coordinating mechanisms be
implemented on a pilot basis only, so that their experience can be used to determine whether these
recommendations for increased administrative and service delivery responsibilities do have a significant
fiscal and accountability impact on the localities.
Sincerely,
(;)d0u7~
Walter F. Perkins
Chainnan
WFP\rww
95.027
../ ",. ~
LONG-TERM CARE RECOMMENDATIONS - ALBEMARLE COUNTY RESPONSE
The Advisory Committee on Aging, Disability, and Long- Tenn Care Services' Preliminarv
Recommendations for the Deliverv of Lonl!:- Term Care Services at the Local Level
The County of Albemarle acknowledges the fragmented service delivery for long-tenn care services that
exists at the state and local level and recognizes the importance of a well coordinated service system for
those citizens in Albemarle county who are in need of long tenn care.
The county of Albemarle also recognizes that one of the four major directives from the General Assembly to
the Advisory Committee was that "any changes in the delivery system not shift costs to localities or require
any unfunded mandates". It is primarly within this directive that Albemarle County cites concerns with
Recommendation # 1 of the report.
In response to Recommendation # 1 of the report: "Each local governing body, or combination thereof,
should identify and support a mechanism to provide a network of connected, collaborative care planning,
authorizing and delivery entities which have comprehensive responsibility for consumer outcomes",
Albemarle County has the following concerns:
· The tenn "identify and SUDDort" could be interpreted to indicate financial support,. not only for the newly
created mechanism, but for the implied responsibilities of identification, planning, and implementation of
long-tenn care services. The recommendation is not clear on this point. Although the County
acknowledges its responsibility to provide infonnation to its citizens at the local level, Albemarle feels
strongly that the delivery, funding and regulatory oversight of long tenn care services should continue to
be the responsibility of the state
· The ambiguity of the tenn "should identify and support a mechanism" again implies that the County
must, or is mandated to have, a collaborative mechanism in place. The County suggests that the
establishment of a local mechanism should be an option for those localities that wish to administer long
tenn care, similar to the option now given to jurisdictions to localize health departments.
· The coordinating mechanism for long-tenn care, similar to the Community Policy and Management
Teams fostered on localities by the Community Services Act, will be put into place with a stated
assumption that localities or member agencies will share the burden of any administrative costs. If the
CPMT is the model for the recommeded coordinating mechanism, and it seems to be, CPMT
administrative costs across the state in staff time, financial accounting and paper work have been
substantial. To imply that no additional costs will be incurred by the localities to coordinate and
administer long-tenn care services is naive, particularly in light of the CPMT experience.
In summary, Albemarle County's major concerns center on the additional coordination, service delivery and
oversight responsibilities that are implicit in the committee's recommendations, however well intentioned.
Therefore, Albemarle County recommends that these local coordinating mechanisms be implemented on a
pilot basis only, so that their experience can be used to detennine whether these recommendations for
increased administrative and service delivery responsibilities do have a significant fiscal and accountability
impact on the localities.
Approved and Submitted by the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
,?
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
R ¡vanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
MEMORANDUM
From:
Board of Supervisors ,~
Ü-j
Ella W. Carey, Clerk ~
August 31, 1995
To:
Date:
Subject: Appointments to Various Boards and Commissions
The following is a list of vacancies that need to be filled for various
boards and commissions. If you have any questions, please feel free to
contact us.
Community Policy and Management Team: One vacancy. There are no set term
limits at this time.
Housing Committee: Three vacancies as of December 31, 1995. Ms. Beverly Dee
Terrell, Mr. Ronald Hancock and Ms. Karen V. Lilleleht are currently serving
with terms ending December 31, 1995, all are eligible for reappointment. Ms.
Terrell and Mr. Hancock did not respond to the reappointment letter. Ms.
Lilleleht wishes to be reappointed. The terms of these appointments will
expire December 31, 1998.
Jaunt Board: One vacancy. Ms. Sonia H. Barton is currently serving a term
that ends September 30, 1996, and is eligible for reappointment. Ms. Barton
verbally resigned from this board, but has not responded in writing (Roxanne
will follow up). This term will remain unexpired until September 30, 1996.
Joint Airport Commission:
Ayers is currently serving
wishes to be reappointed.
1, 1998.
One vacancy as of December 1, 1995. Mr. Stephen
with a term to expire December 1, 1995. Mr. Ayers
The term of this appointment will expire December
Jordan Development Corporation: Two vacancies as of August 13, 1995. Ms.
Lisa Keyes Glass and Mr. Jerry E. Jones terms expired on August 13, 1995. Ms.
Glass and Mr. Jones wish to be reappointed. The terms of these appointments
will expire August 13, 1996.
Industrial Development Authority: One vacancy from the White Hall District.
Mr. Arthur H. Baker resigned June 30, 1995, which leaves this term unexpired
until January 19, 1997. No applications were received for this vacancy.
Land Use Classification Appeals Board: Three vacancies as of September 2,
1995. Mr. Dan M. Maupin, Mr. Fred W. Shields, Jr., and Mr. Montie Pace terms
will expire on September 1, 1995, all are eligible for reappointment. Mr.
Maupin and Mr. Pace did not respond to the reappointment letter. Mr. Shields
wishes to be reappointed. The terms of these appointments will expire Septem-
ber 1, 1997.
*
Printed on recycled paper
· ,"
To:
Page:
Date:
Board of Supervisors
2
August 31, 1995
Library Board: Two vacancies. One vacancy as of June 30, 1995, and one
vacancy due to a resignation. Ms. Shirley B. Dorrier's term expired on June
30, 1995, and she is ineligible to be reappointed. Mrs. Christine K. Baker
resigned June 30, 1995, which leaves this term unexpired until June 30, 1996.
Members serve four year terms beginning July 1 through June 30.
Meadow Creek Parkway Design Planning Advisory Committee: One vacancy. New
Committee. This committee's duration is expected to be from September, 1995,
to June, 1997.
Monticello Area Community Action Agency: One vacancy as of June 1, 1995. Ms.
Josephine M. Blue resigned effective June 1, 1995. There are no limits on the
terms of persons appointed to represent elected public officials.
Public Recreational Facilities Authority: Three vacancies as of December 13,
1995. Mr. C. Timothy Lindstrom, Mr. Scott B. Peyton and Mr. Tim Michel terms
will expire on December 13, 1995, all are eligible for reappointment. Mr.
Lindstrom wishes to be reappointed. Mr. Peyton does not wish to be reappoint-
ed, and Mr. Michel did not respond to the reappointment letter. The terms of
these appointments will expire on December 13, 1998.
Regional Disabilities Services Board: Three vacancies as of July 1, 1995.
One vacancy is staff-related, with Ms. Karen Morris, which expired on July 1,
1995. Mr. Thomas J. Jakubowski and Mrs. Elsie T. Fryer terms expired on July
1, 1995, all are eligible for reappointment. Mr. Jakubowski and Mrs. Fryer
wish to be reappointed. The terms of these appointments will expire July 1,
1998.
Rivanna Solid Waste Authority Citizens Advisory Committee: Two vacancies as
of December 31, 1995. Mr. Richard Spurzem and Mr. John K. Pollock terms will
expire on December 31, 1995, both are eligible for reappointment. Mr. Spurzem
does not wish to be reappointed, and Mr. Pollock wishes to be reappointed.
The terms of these appointments will expire on December 31, 1997.
TJ Housing Improvements Corporation: One vacancy as of December 1, 1995. Mr.
Bruce K. Kirtley's term expires on December 31, 1995, and he is eligible for
reappointment. Mr. Kirtley wishes to be reappointed. The terms of the
appointment will expire on December 31, 1998.
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
EWCjtpf
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
MEMORANDUM
To: Board of Supervisors
(',
From: Ella W. Carey, Clerk tY~/
Date: August 31, 1995
Subject: Applications received for Boards and Commissions
The following applications have been received:
Community Policy and Manaqement Team (CPMT)
Jonathon D. Earl
Joe Lieberman
Melinda Whitehurst
Housinq Committee
Frances Lee-Vandell
Jaunt Board
Chris L. Daschbach
Joint Airport Commission
Richard J. Aubry, Jr.
Andre G. Berkin
Ray Burton Fitzgerald, Jr.
Harold L. Flax
James B. Godfrey
David Joseph Hartman
Robert H. Hodge, Jr., M.D.
Thomas W. Payne, Jr.
Ronald R. Roberts
James D. Savage
Jordan Development Corporation
Judy Rasmussen
Frances Lee-Vandell
Industrial Development Authority
No applications were received.
*
Printed on recycled paper
Charles S. Martin
R ¡vanna
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
,
.
To:
Page:
Date:
.
Board of Supervisors
2
August 31, 1995
Land Use Classification Appeals Board
Marvin H. Hilton
Sandra S. Hodge
Robert Jiraner
Frances Lee-Vandell
David M. Van Roijen
Library Board
Harold L. Flax
Karen Morbeck Hayden
James S. Healey
Jerry E. Jones
Thomas E. Miller
Meadow Creek Parkway Desiqn Planninq Advisory
Committee
Leo J. Casey
Cynthia Hash
Marvin H. Hilton
Gunnar Sedleniek
Carolyn Young
Monticello Area Community Action Aqency
Robert H. Hodge, Jr., M.D.
Frances Lee-Vandell
Public Recreational Facilities Authority
Denny S. Leake
Reqional Disabilities Services Board
Anne M. "Amber" Eros
Joe Lieberman
Pim Little
Rivanna Solid Waste Authority Citizens Advi-
sory Committee
David Booth
James G. Kavanaugh
Laurel (Laurie) Elizabeth Royse
John C. Lowry
William K. Norris
Ed Strange
TJ Housinq Improvements Corporation
No applications were received.
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
EWCjtpf
,
f
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesvi1\e
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
R IVdrmd
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouell
Walter F. Perkms
Whitf' Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scotlsville
Sally H. Thomas
Sðmuel Miller
September 12, 1995
Mr. Stephen Ayers
2980 Cove Trace
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Ayers:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were reappointed to
the Charlottesville-Albemarle Joint Airport Commission with the new term to begin on December 1,
1995 and end on December 1, 1998.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
W~:r~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFP /bt
95-1D
c: Bryan O. Elliott
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
"
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesvi1le
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
R ivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
Wh,le Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsvitle
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
September 12, 1995
Mr. Chris L. Daschbach
1528 Bimam Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Daschbach:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were appointed to the
JAUNT Board to seNe out the unexpired term of a member who resigned, This term will expire on
September 30, 1996.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to seNe the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
WaJ:£..3-~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFPlbt
95-1C
c: Linda A. Wilson
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
..
,
County of Albemarle
u
Office of Board of Coun~ Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville,t VA 22902-4596
(864) ¿96-5843
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD I COMMISSION I COMMITIEE
(please ~:
Board I Commission I Committee ...."......-~-A-U ~1 ~
Applicant's Name ~-S \..- bfì..~ '. ._ Home P}1one ~~1C(f-l 04\
HomeAddressJ5~ :ß,{2.Nf\-M- ~- 1 ~L.Ð'ITG~\JnJ··~"i Y-A --zz~tê-\.
Magisterial District in which your home residence is located -4 ~f
Employer ~c..Jri-t~ ~~ Phone 80 . -12Çß Î
Business Address !5 :3 £.. - ,0 ~ \l.l.-Ç \fI¡;\ - 7-29Lð
Date of Employment " 9: OccupatiOn I Title ~e..-<=-( ~è.\"^Ñ
Years Resident in Albemarle County .3 ~~ Previous Residence ~~ - {¡;¡ ,~S
Spouse'sName~\~ \J~- . i\l~~ Number of Children ~
Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates)
Memberships in Fraternal. Business. Church and lor Social Groups
øf6 "6k~
ReaOQD(~~~:~~iS~~~~.
,
The infonnation provided on this applicatio
to the public upon request.
~
Signature
Date
Return to : Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
~. "'-
Chris L. Daschbach
.ßff _. ",",&.1 .!..1 . -Jr.:J
w.! _~~:... .., -.B-c
..4 , ...J -1
~)9'78-{o4'
The following is a partial listing of my community and non-profit positions and
related experiences.
City of Alezandria
Alexandria Convention & Visitors Bureau, Board of Directors 1994
Alexandria-Caen, France Sister City Committee 1993
Democratic Committee, Volunteer active
Ilid-Atlantic llaritÍllle Festival, Baston, Ilaryland
Model Ship Exhibit, Chairman
Remote Controlled Ship and Sailboat Exhibit, Chairman
1993-1994
1993
Alexandria Jaycees
Financial Vice-President 1994
Board of Directors 1991-1994
Jaycee of the Month 1991
Jaycee of the Quarter 1991
Alexandria Waterfront Festival 1991-19911~
Virginia Scottish Games, Co-Chairman 1993-t9qT
Halloween Haunted House 1990-1993 fYt1
Bachelor/Bachelorette Auction, Committee Member 1990 & 1993
HA Night in the Wild Wild WestH Casino Fundraiser, Chairman 1992
State 1st Place Award-Mgmt Development for Casino Fundraiser 1992
Macy's Charity Day, Chairman 1991
American Heart Association of Talbot County Ilaryland
Board of Directors
1992
National JCidney Foundation, Washington D.C. Iletro Area
HWar Between the StatesH Annual Chili Cook Off
HHearts are WildH Casino Night Gala
Volleyball Marathon
D.C. Chili Cook Off
19~1991, 1993
1990-1994
1990-1991
1991 & 1993
AlIIerican Cancer Society
New Directions - Young Professional Fundraising Group
New Directions State Leadership Conference, Delegate
Corporate Contracts for Major Fundraising, Committee Member
Making Strides Walkathon, Committee Member
HCreative Black TieH Fundraiser, Committee Member
ACS Golf Classic, Chairman
HBidding for BachelorsH Corporate Sponsor Group, Chairman
ACS Annual Award Dinner, Award Recipient
1988-1989
1988
1988-1990
1990
1989
1989
1988
Ilultiple Sclerosis Society
Multiple Sclerosis Young Professional Group, Member
Welcome Barbecue for the Atlanta Braves, Committee Member
Miller Beer U.G.L.Y. Bartender Contest, Chairman
Red Hot Casino Night, Committee Member
1988-1989
1988-1989
1988
1988-1989
~ 'I,
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martm
Rivanlìð
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
While Ha1l
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
September 12, 1995
Ms. Frances Lee- Vandell
2622 Free Union Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Ms. Lee- Vandell:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were appointed to the
Housing Committee with the term to begin on January 1, 1996 and expire on December 31, 1998.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to serve the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
W~:J~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFP/bt
95-1B
c: Virginia C. McDonald
James L. Camblos, IT
*
Printed on recycled paper
,
.,
..
County of Albemarle
,
\..'1'
Office of Board of County SupelVisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville;. VA 22902-4596
(864) ..::96-5843
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITTEE
(please type or print)
Board/Commission/Committee !lO(j,$ffJG C'[}M('II'TT£~; JðRPATV UÞ'EœRMT aef.") LAN!) {jg~Ci.:~SlA
Applicant'sName~MeE3 LtE:~~LL Home Phone .£2q::1-qgq3ì-r.ct.~'t~lS~
Home Address ~(,¿JQ rJe.ti:£ tlNION KoÞt:D - CIIA€I-oTT'E3 VtLLE- ) VA ,:JlJ.. 'I Of ---
Magisterial District in which your home residence is located J~ ~ ~'Pt
Employer ~~'F"F"E:Rg'ON CZa.'fL.-.L.æ.Ñ:> INe.-."* Phone $A:1VIF:
Business Address SA; ME
Date of Employment I q 7<iš Occupation / Title ð W-IIIE:£. .I 'Pte1£X _
Years Resident in Albemarle County c9'-1 + Previous Residence C f1 AR LnlTEgVt LL~
Spouse's Name t?öB.T. ~ IV,4NDE"L.L(D£ecAS'~D) Number of Children Q (~I\I~F'"ATMLV If'I ~t..SE.Lb.
./A I I t...) - ~o fit~ A.."\ -1<~ E. '-£110;..,-
Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates)fV1.A. I ff'l\Jc;, ) lJI Y; ., ~ ; TE:$. ., (;8). MA.~'C.N fiN#- J 'o/Q.
-j{ I ALSo 'S·UBST(T1.I.TE-J1;"AC.H AND ,U;TDE: ~«'f€;'-is:t-( ~ A g !:"Cð~P /J.."I6UA(2.E': (r::.sL). ANS/ I4A11E:
f-«:1t~SfE' -R'£1't'l'SJ::a- A1\I!) RICNTA<.S.
Memberships in Fraternal. Business. Church and lor Social Groups
.sT: 'PAlU..~ M~M~RIAL eH(J~ ) r{OCTH AM£Ii:(eArllv~y Sf!.Jel.fÐTYj¡¡rrtDg£ ¡ J.loaC!.>wAy-AflU~- J
/..e:A;eu. ~£T'Ý) ?1?~SI(:)£wr j 11t'!DM6Nt '':S/... "KOI.LN.D'TIl\'Bl.£) AI....ߣMARl.£ GARD£fV CluB
Public. Civic and Charitable Office and / or Other Activities or Interests
1lAf3/ ~ ¥"ö~ µl1MANITY} (:;1er£A-n=:æ Q¡.<IRl.lYIT£.8 VlUE. ~ ~Jf:I:"/t;?'~- 'ft>AeD ~~I::::
If liCl.PIu> 5T8.f:r rm ¡g AÞrILl A-n: 1 4I11œ.1íED ~~ - 'ViSASTEJ(' A9!oN 7É-A M.l""l\l.¡ "TI>n:;
=f~IYJ4:~ i 'BLLt£ 1?iDG£: ESL ~<.t1'le.IL~.?e¡:::'S, ; \.}AV€ (f')ue $æEAfV/s? ~A~g llMr1.ms~
Pð~ Ivy (ßa;K7 lZAAK WALlbN L~@£ j a nzaJ8 ~e ALߣMAeŒ , A LS£: IItJusr"¡~ GALlTlbN
Reason(s) for Desire to SelVe on this Board I Commission / Committee
II J..13~. (b~ I-J~ MA.tJY ,ÑCW 'Ra-t.D~ ~MLNß u.J.. T s~£ r¡../£¡,¿ 'By TlE"A.eJ.IlfII-g IN TI-IF:...
"S"J.f~~7 A~Uv~ VU'ro£S IN E:"rJfZUSH (q) ¿ T1-I~M ) WðfèK1N~ 5D(,'?4.8-7:JJ:;"-1I? "F{rfL~~ j
AND ""Ç'f:'YJT'k. Th<6€:T Tl-tte~ iN SU.B87/AlÑ'D1MEo .{(j7jg¿r/e IIJrm ".DCI2F.Nr 1-flJl1&{.f'Ie, ~
The information provided on this application will be released to the public upon request.;::; ~M~~ =~
o-ue N4"rtl.eAl.. RE:Eð-a.£~_~
~~(}h ~:>-~&' AUBü5'"r :¿p:, 199C
Signature Date
Return to : Clerk, Board of County SupelVisors
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
·' ,
.- ..
C'-.
~
~
~
==
o
~
~
z
~
>-''''C"O ·~v
v ~ . ~ C ~ c.2 .<;::
CC>-.ro...... ~
o .- 0 Q) ò ~
E 0 .--,.CJ .D '2 ~
5 .~ -š .~ ro E ~
v 0 I J:: .~ E \D
EU OJ) .-500
. - . c..2:' u 0'\
~ '"d ._ "_ 11) I
~ ~ .=:: E ~ gf ~
-5 .~ OJ) ~ E .;; N
.~ ~ .::: .c 0 ..9 ~
~ ......
C 0... >-" - ...... "0 '"
...... 0... 0 ~ "0 C ~
C ro '--' ~ v ro _
.g ..2:' ~ ~ ~ ~ ]
~ ~ : Q) C 8 v
.D ì:: v OJ)...... v '"
'5 OJ) 5 2 '" ~ ~
§~ U OJ) 5 85: '=
U ....... .~ C .D 0... '"
~ ....... ...... .c
....3 '-'~ o.ov= '"
5 0 "0 5 ...... 5 ~ ~
~~§~~E~2
\D
~>-. 0
:::: .~ 0\
~s::: ~
EE;g~
õ::sM>
- ::r: r-- (¡)
~ .... >< ;:::
..s::: 00......
U~o:::1 ~
.... ~o E
~ .<;:: 0... Õ
~..o _
~ = ~
d Õ
~
-<r.r.J
U~
O~
~u
~-
=::~
~~
~r.r.J
O~
r.r.J-
~~
~§
~-<
~O
~~
~ 0 ~ ~ > ;!; ~ s!:: .~ ~ ~ B.S s!:: ~ gf þ
- ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ E ~ ~ .- '- ~
a .~ ~ ro 0.0 0 ~ U -5 ß U 0.0 ro :-= '-2 . C
~ fl< 0 § "0 -;; .2 ..!. ..... .8 ~ §.S a a 0 E
....~ ",c", õo::. t:;~~~2:
~ ~ ~ v ro ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ a
vO~;":::v"O"'" .>~v~"Oo.o~"'R
.c .~ '" ·a..... ~ "9 :.§ v·..... ;..::: c c "0 ..,
::: a v ... > '" '" - 0.0 v ...... "0 ro .::: 1::: _ _v
... a'" ro.....o... .sac _~...
........... ......¡:: v ...... a ~ - ro ro 0.0 ... 0... ro ~
~ 0 0 v 0... a E ...... v ü ..... b!) c ~ . 0.0 '"
a "0 .c a "a .D "'. ~ 2 ~;.§:5 ~ ~ .S 8
.8~~8~-š~~§t:;€~~~a~Õ
S< ~ ..š.~ ~ .::: ~ c :ê § ~ c.s ~ 0.9< ~
o ...... ..... ~ C/) '" c ..... ..... U 0... i5 ~ v .c .~ .c
~ 5 ~ ..9 ~ .~ E ~ ~ ~ oS ¿ :: § ~ "[ ~
~ ] ] ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ å ~ .~ = ~
..... c c v ~ _ >0 .=: .c ..... :E ::I E ;:: ~ .2 0
ro ro ro ...... ....... ro - '" "" c.: ........ ..... '"
.c.......c0"'~.....~.D"O"O ""..... ,...... ~
.....~.....::IocO"'vv§£~....~o.oË~
~ ::I ~ ~ ¡¡:: Va a .c ü .- ~ .<;:: c 0 a
...... '" 0 0 ro ........... 2 v v > ~ .D '2 U
~ v E 0.0 C a "0 ° c.: ro ...... v v
a .D :;E 5 2 v .S 0 t) .;:: 'Vj 5. 0..:I:: ~ .D a
~
E-t
~I-I
~z
~-<
~>~
~í'-);:J
E-t~=:
-<E-t~
~E-to
~o~
~~E-t
-<~
=:1-1
u~
-<
=:
>-. v >-.,.....:' 0.0 v , '" r---
.D = .D Õ .; c 2 ro N
"0 .;; "0 "0 ~ 0 .D ~ \0
v",vcuv§æv_
~~c~ Ocro
.......0....."0 C "'
Õ ..9 's. 0 § ] ~ t) ~
e-aa~"' v~5
o.c~-~§~a.c
~ ~ U ~ P::: .;:: ;..::: "a v
.- v '" U U ro S ~ oS
] ~ ; ro....c :;E '2 ro ..... c
~ ~ >-.¡,¡.,_ ro"a ~ v
o tì..... :-= ~'ü ;.;:: .c
0'\ v '2 '" ~ 0 ~ v ~
O'\.c~c "ac:¡:::.c
.: § .~ ~ g ::. Ë ~
.S 0'\ :I:: .<;:: ;::::: - N ~ _
"0 ~ ~ U ~ ~ .'" .
v 0 "0 "0 E-< .~ ~ -
-5J Q <.¡;:., v .... ~ .S 0'\ ~
:Ë ~ êa ~ c.2 g ~~.-.o
Æ~~~~!~~8
-
~]
¡!3õ
I
C
ro
c
.-
.c
..... .... en
~ v c
;;>co
t: '"
-droo
8 0... ~
~"a.....
U U ....
:.a..9v
..gt)~v
~J:§a
~v.cO
.c......c
v......:.a~
::I ..d ~ v
c - v c
~§:;E....
~ ~ 'õ
¡;;;¡ .~ .c
- .....
~o
.c -
p.. .:::
."0
..2:'v
.- >
a 0
~ a
c
o
'"
c
:i
§ ..: >.=
'" <U U <U
cl-;~ .§§]
~~I-; @Z~¡g
.... .!:: S 0 vi' , '51>
q,¡~q,¡.c.: ::I<Ub!)
o...c I-; ä:ì'- c.: j _
.!:: u ~ .... .s ¡,¡". ~
~~~~~c~Q)
u.- I ~:> ~ g .¡::
I~§;....:vi'~ªc
~ VJ VJc~ ~"'O~~ ~
~ , - I-, E
"0.... .¡:: ~ .... 2 C': ¿.Ii
C': ;>â)"~ou:::
~¡'¡"'CI}t::"O"O~<Up:
;;> .~ <U C': .... ¡.L¡ 0 <U
<U u '51> 0 c.2 >. Z ......1 ~
U2 "¡: ~ E = ~ - t:: t)
~-ê ~â):-:::..co<U
:Qp..~;':::;;;> :Q :Q-."":¡
~
-
~
=::
~
~r.r.J
r.r.JZ
~o
~r.r.J
~~
~~
-~
~~
~<
o=::
uu
q,¡
¡.,
::I
.....
....
~ ::I
..... z
:12 OJ) ~
c :ë C==
.~ C ::I :ø E
"t..~ ~ p.. ~ r~
q,¡ ..... q,¡, ..... ....
~~~..c "CI~
CJ'.)~c~OJ)cc
q,¡ CJ'.) ::I <U C ::I c.:
..... '">- õ....:¡·- ~ ';::'n
éi5 ~>-;:. :E I '"'"
== ........ Q.) ... ~ bO
'5'ï:::I<u°
-ô' ~ §.2 ~ .§ ~
æ ~ EO".... .¡::
~':::~§ÖC':
"0 :J ;...- CI} ~ ~ :E
¡.L¡ C': ....... _y 0.;:: ,
¡,¡"....."OZcC':
>. ~ c .- u
t::c::V':ì...c::::::~~
~~j~i:Ï5>:E
~ v 6.
'"0 ~ ::I
.~ §.~
(1) .- 0
oS~.....
c .~ ~
:s § ~
.- 0.0.D
~ 5 '5
~ _ c
~ ro 0
~ § ~
0-4..0 c::
o ro ro
v E """"'
~ v ~
.- E ::I
¡;: .- '5
'E~8
"a-.D
u..........
..900
v ~ ~
~:.§.,g
'.c >-'V"O ' '.c .
s::: 0.0.D a c .~ a 0.0 ~
8. ::1"0 r~:Õ ro ::I ......
v 0 v '" _ ¡,¡., 0 .<;::
...."Oc ~ ~>
] oS ro .S '" p.. ] oS .;::
:~ B ~ g .~_ gf ro. à g
v ~ ....::1 ._ ~ ro '"
] v 84-< a;:g~] 5
~ g. ~ >-. a ::I..... .¡::
;.;:: ~ao~§]~
4-< v ._ E U _ '" :>
~ ~ ,... ._ r- . 0 .'""!
..... .:: ~.... c "'- C'; .......
.....-.....".c 0"" ~ '-'
g iE 0 - 0.0'- . (1) C
(1)"E'E~::Iü§aro
en - ro .... 0 v .- '" C
",ro08.EÕü"00
v g ~ .- ..... C/) V C _
õ- ~"O õ::l~
.c v ~ 0 v 8 C/) ¡,¡., .-
Q) .c ~ _v -5J i:i3 >-. Q) . ~
1::; 8~;..:: .-:--::: s.... <3
o C V'ü 0... 0.0 a € '"
Z ro E c E .C ro ::I _
t: ...:- ~ ï::::: 0 .§ ¡,¡., Z ~
o ~ 0... ~ ro >. >-..!::
0..."0 ro ~ ro t::t::: .<;:: :-::: "0
I
ro
U
U '"
o v
.....
o .;¡:;
.....
"0 gf
8:.a
13 :a
;":::.D
.~ .8
0.0",
C C
...... 0
"0 ._
C ~
.2 C
o
E"O
V"O
a3
E
v"a
> C
o .S
tì ""
... ":>
~.... "1::!
~ -::; ~ '& ~ ..t;
.!:f 00'" ~...
¡." :;::: >--.:;:::..t:)..s::
~.",..t:) C).... 00
":> ¡." '';:: t; ~ rr;
.... ~ "1::! ~ :;::: C 0\
..s:: "1::! ~.... C) :.;:: ~
":>- ¡.;, \.) \.)..s:::;:::
t: ~ ~ ~ :;::: ::: ....
....~:;::: ":> C) ~ ":>
~ <:; C) ~ '';:: .-::: t:
\.) ~ E} ~ .~ "§ ~
~......~\.).....~
:;::::;::::;:::_ C).....
:;:::C)~"":>C)00
.... ;;:. ~ ~.... :;:::
$ Q~:::::: '"' 'r:;
, ¡." ~.~ ~g....
~~ ~.:; ":> ~ a ~
~ ":> ~ ........."1::!
~ ........ '-' :;:::
¡.;,i3~..9¡::~~
~~~e.9¡.,,<.i::,
\.)Q:¡ :;:::..s::~ ~
..::!~¿,u~C)
~-::; Q:::
..!.. ti'j d) .~
~ Ë ~ t)
ro 0 a v
'" .c v ~
.- .D-
:;;: .~
v a
.c a
...... 0
"':-U
~ Q
¿ ~
o .-
...... >
-"0
~<r:
v OJ)
oS .:::
.::: ~
o
::r::
>-.
......
C
::I
o
U
~;g
a .....
v êJ
í::::: v
ro.D
a -
v C5
::9 E
'1 v
v.c
=-
.;; .....
'" 0
v v
::: E
00'"
~ rfJ 2
.... ro
.cot)
U<'¡;:"v
v OJ) "0
.cCc
E-< .;:: ro
......1
..... '"11
3 0
3 3
'<(Ð
n'""l
~'"t:
;4@
(Ð en
'""I .....
0..
(Ð
::s
~
...... 3 o' '"11
3' (Ð '< Q
~ ::s (Ð
;:¡......o..~
'< 0 ...... ;:¡
~ """'::rQ
::s Õ' (1) (Ð
0..'""I~ ET
:;t: 3s::e¡
o (1) cr' ...
rJ'J ""1 ÞOOOOO' ....-..
~ '"t: (=;' ...,
- '""I .~
'< (Ð en '<
::s en s::
::s ..... ~ (Ð
n ~~ ~
~ ::s 0 ~
::4......::4>T<
(Ð ~ ......
:-; ::s ~ ~
o..::sg:
'"110........
=ï (Ð ~
~ ::s ::r
_o..~
l 0 en
~ ~ (1)
':;<: ~ ::;'
ä~
~~
~ ~
:::s ~
~......,
~ 1::1 ;t;o<
~~. [~.
~~~~
1:1. ;æ ~ !iQ
...,,~ ;æ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
:::s-:::s ~ ~
-. ..,..,
~~~~
~ ::I. ~ ~
:=~~~
~ ~ ::
1::1 1::1 ~
r..¡. ~ ..,
1::1 ",0.0
~ ~
~~
C§;~~~£~~~
~~ e.;: ~ 5.. ~ ~ ~'"
~ ~ ~ .... ~ '..;¿ '!"oooI
~!r.9~5:~~
~~~'"~~ ~~
~æ2'@c~;:~
~~~~~~;:
o:::r-~e.~~"""c
~~c~;:!~~
~c~~co:::r-
;:¡. ;: <:::" ""f '""'t ~ §..
()c :::.....~~~c
c,j c ~.....~~;:
~o:::r-~~~e.;:
;:~~~ 9i'
~ ;: s: ...
~ ~
..... ~ ..... ~ cr' 7' .~
en;:¡en(1C¡,<'::::"_
-&<7(Ð-&<7(Ð 00
_~w< ::r:@oo
-....J'""+>~U\~~......
U\ 0 0 - cr' - ...,
"1 0 s:: :=.' ... -
~o(Ð~......§S
~ ~ 0 -
::4 § ......, ~ ~ ;.
::So..~o""""Õ
~ e- ::r: § ~ en
¡;;> (Ð ~ 0.. ::r ::ï
3 ~ ..... ...... 0
..... < S ::r s:: W
:=:~......(1)enOO
~~g~~o
..... (1) s:: 0 ::r e-
::S~en::!...~<(Ð
......;:¡(ÐO" '""I
::r 0 _.' (Ð
~::S::S"""3cr'("')
(Ð e- ...... ::r (1) g
::r-~(1)g::s
o '< ~ ......
~~ c< cr''""I
~ ð g =_. õ'
?;> -¡- CI) ," ...... en
~_. ~ ~ 03. ~ ~
-~:::';Jo'~~
..... :::. ;" >T< 0 _.
~ ... 1-1 ...... _. @
~.........0..~::S0..
en~§g:gcr'
S' ~ 0.. S ;. ~
...... ::!. r-' ...... ..... ::r
::r ("') _. ~ .J (Ð
(ÐS::5.~~<
c yo ~ en S ¡¡;.
::s >T< '"11 ......,0 ::s õ'
-. ...... s:: (Ð
õ~::::S::þ::S
0.. ;:. (1) ::s '""I 0
........,"'...............,
CI)~' -.....n
...... ...... ~ (1) 3 _
~ ::r _. 0.. (Ð ~
~ ~ ET :::. ::!. (Ð
... ("') ::s
~o~_s::("')
::s<~\Oyo~
O"~2"-....JQo
o \Os:: O\(Ð 8..
~~~~~§
I
o
e¡
(Ð
::s
("')
(Ð
......
o
"1
0..
§
£g..~
~ ~ <::t'
~ :!. ~
~ ..... .....
c ~ !-..
*o:::r-<:::"
~ ;: ~
"'t.....~
'"~ ("'¡ c
o:::r-~ ~
;: .... ;:
..... ~ ~
("'¡ ì ~
9 ~
8 Š ~.
""t ..... ;:
~ c
~ .....
~
'"
'"
I
~
-
;"
"1
0..
'"11
E.
~
'""I
8e.~e.~
;:~~~~
;: ~ c ;: "'t'"
;: ;:; ;: .... ~
;:~~~~
~!~~~
~ ~ š ;; ;:¡.
.... ~ e. ~ ()'Q
~;:~e.~
~~'" ~ c
fr~~~
;:;. ~ ;: ~
("'¡ =:. ,,,",,
~.~ ~
~~fr
S' § cr' cr' ~ 0.. en 0.. N ::s ::r:
(1C¡ '" '< =. a ~ g: ~ ~ 0 ~
- -......, (Ð ~ 0.. _0' ::;' g'.
¡¡;. 0 S' 0.. ..... -
en ET 0.. S' : ~ ~. ::r ::s 'Q g
~ g :;;. (1C¡ ::r en :::. g 0.. g,
en 0·" :;::. ~ '""10 ::r ... (Ð _. Õ'
_ ;:¡ (Ð ~ :!:. 0.. ~ ....
ö;3S::~S:::=;:'(Ð::S-'
~ ~ ...... (1C¡ (Ð 0 (1C¡ Q' ~ ::r:
::st;;"~::r'""l~' ~Qs::
Ñ' ~ ;'::s ET ~ ::r: 0.. s:: 3
ê. g. ëñ 9 ~ S' ~ ......0 ' ~
~ _. ....... ~ _....... ~ ::S_.
o s:: ::s ~ en'" (1)-
~ (i 0..(1) (Ð ~ -o:~
o..::r ..., 0 8.. ~ ;. (1) _
(Ð (Ð ~ ~ s:: cr' ë5 ~. n ::s
o..~en 0 ............s:: "1::s::r~
(=;' ("') '""I 0- 0 :::.; :;or:;- ~ ::!. a
~ 0.. en _. en
~.~ ~ § ET _. _.::S ~. ~
0.. ~ ,. en (Ð ..a ::s (1C¡ e¡ 0_·
...... 0 . 3 u'" en'"
0""ê''"11 en~s::o::S
::r ~ ::s s:: ~ 3' ;:¡ g" ö;3 e:.
g õ' ~ 5. ::s 'E.. ~ S § ¡¡;.
r.r ~ 8.. yo 9 ~(Ð '7 ::;' " ~
=:
>
~
ÞO-C ÞO-C
, ~~
.trj~
:I~~
E ~ ~
.ÞO-C=:
o~
" z~
»
t"'4z
ÞO-C
~
~
"
1::1
-(
::r=::r=
e~
~~
>~
Z~
~~
ÞOO-Ìo
~¡o
~
~
~
m
C1
¡o
tI'j
~
tI'j
¡o
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
R ivannd
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scoltsvitle
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Mil1er
September 12, 1995
Ms. Karen V. Lilleleht
Route 16, Box 374
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Ms. Lilleleht:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were reappointed to
the Housing Committee with the term to begin on January 1, 1996 and expire on December 31, 1998.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
W~~~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFP/bt
95-1A
c: Virginia C. McDonald
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
1r"
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scotlsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
September 12, 1995
Ms. Beverly Dee Terrell
1 Monterey Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Ms. Terrell:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were reappointed to
the Housing Committee with the tenn to begin on January 1, 1996 and expire on December 31, 1998.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
uJ~ i-~
Walter F. Perkins
Chainnan
WFPlbt
95-1
c: Virginia C. McDonald
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
· I
1 Monterey Drive
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Terrell
August 29, 1995
Ella W. Carey
Board of County Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Dear Ms. Carey,
I received your letter concerning reappointment to the Housing
Committee. Although I feel that I have much to learn to be a more effective
member, I have decided that I would like to continue membership on the
Housing Committee. I will continue to comply with the standards expected of
a committee member in the Housing Committee I s effort to maintain fair,
affordable and decent housing.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to serve, the County as a committee
member on the Housing Committee.
Siiìc¿rdy,
/
~
Beverly Dee Terrell
\~
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivannd
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouell
Walter F. Perkins
While Hðn
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsvi!le
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miner
September 12, 1995
Mr. Bruce W. Kirtley
Rt. 1, Box 405
Crozet, VA 22932
Dear Mr. Kirtley:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were reappointed to
the Thomas Jefferson Housing Improvement Corportaion with the new term to expire on December
31, 1998.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
W~:;-~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFP/bt
95-10
c: Nancy K. O'Brien
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
September 12, 1995
Ms. Lisa Keyes Glass
120 Forestvue Drive
Earlysville, VA 22936
Dear Ms. Glass:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were reappointed to
the Jordan Development Corporation with the new term to expire on August 13, 1996.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
VJ~:¡-~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFP/bt
95-1E
c: Forrest D. Kerns
Virginia C. McDonald
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
R ¡vanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshal!, Jr.
Scoltsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
September 12, 1995
Mr. Jerry E. Jones
116 Wildflower Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Jones:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were reappointed to
the Jordan Development Corporation with the new term to expire on August 13, 1996.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
W~+~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFPlbt
95-1F
c: Forrest D. Kerns
Virginia C. McDonald
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
I
·0
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
While Hat!
Forrest R. Marshal!, Jr.
$cottsviUe
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Ml11er
September 12, 1995
Robert H. Hodge, Jr., MD
2764 Browns Gap Tnpk
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Dr. Hodge:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were appointed to the
Monticello Area Community Action Agency (MACCA). There are no term limits.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to serve the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
W~1-~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFP/bt
95-1H
c: Kenneth Ackerman
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
, \.
County of Albemarle
41995
Office of Board ofCoun~ Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville,t VA 22902-4596
(804) ¿96-5843
APPLICATION TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMISSION / COMMITIEE
(please type or print)
Board/Commission/Committee ~1ontir:pllo Arp.êJ Communi tv Action Aqency (MACAA)
Applicant's Name Robert H. Hodae Jr. MD Home Phone 804-823-4001
Home Address 2764 Browns Gap Tnpk ChêJrl ottp.~vi 11 e. VA 22901
Magisterial District in which your home residence is located Wh i te Ha 11
~ployer Commonwealth Health Alliance Phone 804-977-3500
Business Address P.O. Box 1067 r.hñrlnttpc;villp VA ??c)0?
DateofEmploymen19/1/90 Occupation/Title Vice President
Years Resident in Albemarle County 1 6 Previous Residence M i chi q a n
Spouse's Name Sandra Hodge Number of Children 0
Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates) AB Pri nceton 1968 MD Harvard 1972
Memberships in Fraternal. Business. Church and lor Social Groqps
White Hall Ruritan Club, Albemarle County Medical Society, Virginia Medical Societ~
American Colleae of Phvsicians. American College of Physician Executives
Public. Civic and Charitable Office and / or Other Activities or Interests
Consultant for W.K. Kelloaa Foundation. Associate Clinical Professor UVA
School of Medicine, Advisory Board Aging Policy Committee (UVA)
VirQiniêJ Pñrtnprc; of thp Amprirñc;
Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on this Board / Commission / Committee
I have a stronq interest in supportinq the qoals of MACAA and I would like to
contribute my experience in health care, foundation grant-making, and management
as a member of the Board of Directors.
The information provided on this application will be released to the public upon request.
--4-¥ /r
Signature
t'Á/9S
Date
Return to : Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, V A 22902-4596
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivannð
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scotlsvil1e
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
September 12, 1995
Mr. Fred W. Shields, Jr.
Greenmont Farm Drive
P. O. Box 271
Keene, VA 22946
Dear Mr. Shields:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were reappointed to
the Land Use Classification Appeals Board with the new term to expire on September 1, 1997.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
W~-}~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFPlbt
95-1G
c: Bruce M. Woodzell
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
""
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
September 12, 1995
Mr. C. Timothy Lindstrom
Route 7, Box 228
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Tim:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were reappointed to
the Public Recreational Facilities Authority Board with the new term to expire on December 13,
1998.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
w~~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFPlbt
95-11
c: V. Wayne Cilimberg
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
R ivannd
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
September 12, 1995
Mr. Thomas 1. Jakubowski
227 Minor Ridge Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Jakubowski:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were reappointed to
the Regional Disability Services Board with the new term to expire on July 1, 1998.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
W~::¡-~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFPlbt
95-1K
c: Nancy K. O'Brien
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivanrk::l
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
September 12, 1995
Mrs. Elsie T. Fyrer
307 Eastbrook Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mrs. Fyrer:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were reappointed to
the Regional Disability Services Board with the new term to expire on July 1, 1998.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
w~+~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFPlbt
95-1L
c: Nancy K. O'Brien
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Karen L. Morris, Director, Social Services
WalterF. Perkins, Chair, Board of County Supervisors td;! #~~~
ßJ
September 13, 1995
DATE:
RE:
Reappointment to Regional Disability Services Board
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were reappointed to
the Regional Disability Services Board with said term to expire on July 1, 1998.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
WFPlbt
95-lJ
c: Nancy K. O'Brien
James L. Camblos, II
David P. Bo"""nnan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rrv<mna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsvil1e
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
September 12, 1995
Mr. John K. Pollock
P. O. Box 265
Batesville, VA 22924
Dear Mr. Pollock:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were reappointed to
the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority Citizens Advisory Committee with the new term to expire on
December 31, 1997.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to continue serving the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
W( _&3-~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFPlbt
95-1N
c: Arthur D. Petrini
~ames L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
\
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
WhIle Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Mil1er
September 12, 1995
Mr. David Booth
531 Tattershall Farm Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Dear Mr. Booth:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were appointed to the
Rivanna Solid Waste Authority Citizens Advisory Committee with the term to begin on January 1,
1996 and expire on December 31, 1997.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to serve the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
W~-T~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFPlbt
95-1M
c: Arthur D. Petrini
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
"
~
"
'I I
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
Fax:804-296-5800
Aug 29 '95 16:05
P.04/OS
County of Albemarle "
; .
'~-.
~.".<:"
",=, ~---
!ì66/ 0 €
. ,
.,
;-1-'
Office of Board ofCoun~ Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesvil1e,a. VA 22902-4596
(804) ¿96-S843
APPLICA nON TO SERVE ON BOARD / COMMTSSION / CQMMIlTEE
(please type or print) .
Board / Commission / Committee R/~ANNA SDLI D WA STE C,r;2EtV5 Adv/SDI<Y Cornmí-fk~
Applicant's Name LAu/!..6 '- G'-/1-A5GTH . !<ðyS e (Lauri~ ') Home Phone ( 5tfD) +5"b - b Lj47
HomeAddress pO. 8ðX 205'( BA1E.SIJIi-¿.6o' VIR..bIÚIA 2-2-72-<-{
Magisterial District in which your home residence is loc~ted J'a mu e../ IYII "¡}.f.../'l....
Employer YELL-O'IV /vfOu( hJ. (~ In <;J)¡) fe Phone (51-(0) 4::;b - q 'i;Î I
Business Address PO. BoY. 2-05 , 8o..l--~sv·, 1/<:..- ( VtR..1Ih/·c... 2.7-12.. <f
Date of Employment 10/94- Occupation/Title £XeCUflVL.. D,R.ec..-fof2......
Years Resident in Albemarle County c::: f Previous Residence d a ra so h , FLo ¡¿ /011
Spouse's Name Dou!j I a. 5 £.. R-ov sc:.... Nwnber of Children I '
Education (Degrees and Graduation Dates) UnlveJ<Srry of MlcÝII9°-t'1{ ANN ArbDr" B.A, MWf( ¡q<irO
MembeN:hip~ in Fraternal Business Church and lor Social GrouRS
N()rv~ Ar THE:. Pt2-ES6NT nþ't£
Public. Civic and Charitable Office and lor Other Activities. or Interests
.s ~ e.. CA.- +ro..ck4
Reason~) for Desir.e to Serve on this Board I Commission / Commi~~
$ee- ~À
The infonnation provided on this application ill be released to public upon request.
g-3()- 9';
Date
Return to : Clerk, Board of County Supervisors
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
I õbd-~
t" "\
l... ...
Application To Serve on Rivanna Solid Waste
Citizens Advisory Committee (continued)
Public. Civic and Charitable Office and/or Other Activities or Interests
I have researched solid waste management issues since 1988 as Executive Director and
Founder of Recycle Now!, a broad-based group of citizens, civic organizations and
business organized to study and offer solutions to solid waste issues in Sarasota County,
Florida. Recycle Now! developed a blueprint for a new solid waste master plan that was
adopted by Sarasota County residents via a public referendum.
I currently donate my time as Executive Director of Yellow Mountain Institute, a 50 1 (c)3
non-profit organization which provides information, training and building services on
sustainable, low-cost housing throughout a six-state region. I have donated my services to
housing organizations, government agencies and have participated in housing conferences
throughout the region.
Additionally, I am a licensed real estate broker in the State of Virginia and plan to join the
local Board of Realtors and to become involved in Board-related civic activities.
Reason(s) for Desire to Serve on this Board/Commission/Committee
Public service is an integral component of both my professional and personal life. I have a
unique background which lends itself to the needs of this community at this time. I have
eight years of experience in researching all aspects of solid waste management with a
particular focus on how to balance environmental issues with the realities of sound, fiscal
management. My background as Executive Director of Recycle Now! provided me with
valuable experience in organizing a broad-based group of people and organizations, with
widely varied interests, to work together as team players. I am able to give fair
consideration to the issues and people involved as we continue the very exciting task of
guiding the solid waste master plan development of Albemarle County.
P¥ {) of
- "\'
Laurel E. Royse
CAREER SUMMARY
YELLOW MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE
Executive Director
RECYCLE NOW!
Executive Director
LAUREL E. ROYSE, BROKER
Real Estate Broker, Virginia and Florida
ROYSE ENTERPRISES, INC.
Vice President
JUSTICE, INC.
Development Coordinator
F.D.I., INCJPRIME PLUS
Acquisitions
REAL EQUITY, INC.I
REAL EQUITY MORTGAGE
Development Coordinator/
President of Mortgage Company
CHARTER ONE, INC.
Senior Marketing Consultant
DUNES MARKETING GROUP, INC.
Real Estate Sales
March '94 - Present
August '89 - May '94
March '86 - Present
January '86 - January '88
March '85 - January '86
March '84 - February '85
March '83 - February '84
May '81 - February '83
May '80 - May '81
NOTEWORTHY CREDENTIALS
Experienced in:
Community organizing
Solid waste master plan development
Residential and conunercial construction
Feasibility studies
Real estate brokerage operations and sales
Mortgage brokerage operations and sales
(conunercial and residential)
Orange grove development
Development of national sales organization
Management and Accounting
Awards:
Named West Coast Woman, 1990, by West Coast Women
Magazine, Florida
Recipient "Enviromnent.ll Hero" 1990 Award
by the Growth-EnvirOlunent Organization (GEO)
Sarasota, Florida; a 25,000 member-based organization
PERSONAL DATA
Born:
December 30, 1957
Address: P.O. Box 205
Batesville, Virginia 22924
Education:
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan
1976-1980, B.A.
540/456-6447 home
540/456-9879 office
....
CAREER DETAIL
YELLOW MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE
Batesville, Virginia
March '94 . Present
Executive Director and Founder
Responsible for administrative and fiscal development, intennediate and long-tenn planning, fund raising, conducting
educational programs including workshops and the building school, materials sales and distribution and the devel-
opment and implementation of outreach programs to housing advocates, schools and community organizations
throughout the country on sustainable housing.
RECYCLE NOW!
Sarasota, Florida
August '89 . May '94
Executive Director and Founder
Founded Recycle Now!, a broad-based group of citizens, civic organizations and business organized to study and offer
solutions to solid waste issues. Recycle Now! developed a blueprint for a new solid waste master plan for Sarasota
County, Florida which was adopted by the County through a public referendum. Responsible for administration,
intennediate and long-range planning, fund raising, public speaking and colmnunity organizing.
LAUREL E. ROYSE, BROKER
Florida and Virginia
President
Sold estate properties, land and orange groves. Prepared feasibility studies including a study for the purchase and
development of a new orange grove. Real eSk'l1e brokerage activities in Virginia include buying and selling
properties for Yellow Mountain Institute's construction projects.
ROYSE ENTERPRISES, INC.
Sarasota, Florida
January '86 . January '88
Vice President
Royse Enterprises, Inc. was selected as Sales Director of a six state region in the midwest for Central Corporation,
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, a publicly-held company. Established a successful sales network in each state that sold long
distance phone services from hotels and pay phones.
JUSTICE, INC.
Sarasota, Florida
March '85 . January '86
Development Coordinator
As Development Coordinator for this large South Carolina based cOImnercial and residential real estate developer,
Royse was in charge of all aspects of the construction of an 11 story bank building in Sarasota, Florida. Provided
direct supervisor of construction activities and coordinated all financing efforts as the primary liaison between the
bank and the development company partners.
2
.
. .'
REAL EQUITY, INC./
REAL EQUITY MORTGAGE, INC.
St. Petersburg, Florida
March '83 - February '84
Development Coordinator and
President of Mort~a~e Company
As development coordinator for a large conunercial developer, Royse was directly responsible for coordinating the
design and planning, financing, construction and sales of a $10 million dollar condominium project located in Key
West, Florida. Other responsibilities included preparing preliminary overviews of other projects under consideration
by the developer. Concurrently, as president of the mortgage company, Royse assisted other developers in securing
more than $2 million dollars for their conunercial developments.
CHARTER ONE, INC.
Sarasota, Florida
May '81 - February '83
Senior Marketing Consultant
Royse joined this consulting finn as the youngest research analyst. Responsibilities included compilation of
infonnation for feasibility studies on large, commercial real estate projects. Royse was promoted to project leader
managing the work of other analysts and finally senior marketing analyst and advisor to the president of Charter One.
DUNES MARKETING GROUP, INC.
Hilton Head, South Carolinal
Daytona Beach, Florida
May '80 - May '81
Real Estate Salesperson
Created a successful state-wide broker referral network for projects in Florida and South Carolina.
3
..
# .'
PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES
Laurel E. Royse (Laurie)
James Ford Growth Environment Organization, Sarasota, Florida 904/372-2485
Lee Hanison Commercial Developer, Sarasota, Florida 813/955-1400
Ronald Spector Commercial Developer, Sarasota, Florida 813/365-0969
Dan Lobeck Attorney, Sarasota, Florida 813/955-5622
Teresa Harrison Attorney, Sarasota, Florida 813/349-7157
Vicky Wheaton Faber, Virginia 804/361-1642
Rick Carter Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia 804/977-0191
Virginia Barber OB/GYN private practice, Charlottesville, Virginia 804/295-6528
a·
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 2%5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivðnnð
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scotlsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
September 12, 1995
Mr. Ralph E. Allen
80 Apple Lane
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Mr. Allen:
At the Board of County Supervisors meeting held on September 6, 1995, you were appointed to the
newly authorized Solid Waste Task Force. This task force has been set up to review any alternative
that might be viable for handling solid waste in the Charlottesville/Albemarle area. Future
correspondence will originate with Arthur Petrini, Director, Rivanna Solid Waste Authority.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to express the Board's appreciation for
your willingness to serve the County in this capacity.
Sincerely,
{;J~-J~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFP/bt
95-1P
c: Arthur D. Petrini
James L. Camblos, II
*
Printed on recycled paper
.. .
."'."
David P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scotlsvine
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
September 15, 1995
Ms. Josephine M. Blue
100 Chestnut Ridge Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Ms. Blue:
This letter is written in appreciation of your service since June, 1990.
The Board of Supervisors has asked me to expresss its thanks to you for the many hours which you
spent as a member of the Monticello Area Community Action Agency (MACCA). Please be assured
that your efforts have been noted and the Board thanks you for your service.
Sincerely,
W~+~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFPlbt
95-2A
c: Kenneth Ackerman
*
Printed on recycled paper
.. ~, ..
DaVId P. Bowennan
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060
Charles S. Martin
Rivannd
Charlotte Y Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkms
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scotlsvil1e
Sally H. Thomas
Sdmuel Miller
September 15, 1995
Mrs. Shirley B. Domer
Box 7 Endfield
Scottsville, VA 24590
Dear Mrs. Domer:
This letter is written in appreciation of your service during September, 1987 through June, 1995.
The Board of Supervisors has asked me to express its thanks to you for the many hours which you
spent as a member of the Library Board. Please be assured that your efforts have been noted and the
Board thanks you for your service.
Sincerely,
WcdPiv ?-~
Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
WFP\bt
95-2
c: Donna M. Selle
*
Printed on recycled paper