HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-04-19
po I N A L
7:00 P.M.
April 19, 1995
Room 7, County Office Building
1) Call to Order.
2) Pledge of Allegiance.
3) Moment of Silence.
4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
5) Consent Agenda (on next sheet).
6) SP-95-01. Centel Cellular of Charlottesville. Public Hearing on a
request to construct a communication tower/antennas & support bldgs
on 4.154 ac zoned HI at end of Northside Dr in Northside Industrial
Pk on W sd of Rt 29N approx 0.9 mi N of Rt 649. TM32,P67. Rivanna
Dist. (Site is located in Community of Hollymead and recommended
for Industrial Service.)
7) SP-95-02. Crestar Bank. Public Hearing on a request to modify & expand
drive-in windows for existing Crestar Bank. Property of 1.2 ac
zoned CO & EC located in NE quadrant of Rt 29/Rio Rd. TM61,P123A.
Rio Dist. (Site is located in Neighborhood 2 and recommended for
Community Service.)
8) SP-95-04. Centel Cellular Company of Charlottesville. Public Hearing on
a request to construct a communication tower/antennas & support
bldgs on 302 ac zoned RA & EC. TM73,P28 is the Ivy Landfill.
Samuel Miller Dist. (Site is not located in designated growth
area. )
9) SP-95-05. Anthony E. Champ. Public Hearing on a request to allow more
than 600 sf for on-premise sale and/or consumption of wine. Proper-
ty on W sd of Rt 674 approx 800 ft S of Rt 673. TM26,P52. White
Hall Dist. (Site is not located in designated growth area.)
10) CPA-95-02. Milton Airport Area B Study. Public Hearing on a proposal to
amend the Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan to include recommenda-
tions of the Milton Airport "Area B" Study as stipulated in the
Three Party Agreement between the County, City of Charlottesville
and the University of Virginia.
11) Request to amend County Code to allow resident fees to Parks for nonresi-
dent County employees.
12) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
13) Adjourn to April 25, 1995, 7:00 p.m. for Joint Public Hearing with School
Board.
CO.SE1fT
AGBNDA
FOR APPROVAL:
5.1 Revision to Personnel Policy on Voluntary Early Retirement Incentive Plan
(P-63) .
5.2 Statement of Expenses for the Department of Finance, Sheriff, Common-
wealth's Attorney, Regional Jail and Clerk, Circuit Court, for the month
of March, 1995.
5.2a Procl...tion proclataing April 23 through April 29, 1995 as National
Cri.. Vict~' Right. Week.
5.2b Procl...tion proclataing April 24 through April 28, 1995 as Building a
C~ity of Life-Long Learner. Week.
FOR :IØORJIAT:ION:
5.3 Copy of Planning Commission minutes for March 21, 1995.
5.4 Arbor Cre.t Apartment. (Hydraulic Road Apartments) Bond Program Report
and Monthly Report for the month of March, 1995.
5.5 Copy of letter dated April 5, 1JJ5 from The Honorable Thomas J. Bliley,
Jr., Member of Congre.., to Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, re:
Section 18 federal funding for tran.it programs.
5.6 Copy of letter dated April 11, 1995 from Peter W. Schmidt, Director,
Depar=-ent of ~viroDm8Dtal Quality, to Katherine B. Slaughter, Southern
BDvironmental Law Center, re: exceptional waters nominations.
5.7 Acae De.ign Technology, Co.'S January and February 1995 operating results
(on file in Clerk'. office).
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director, Planning & Community Development
FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk
DATE: April 24, 1995
SUBJECT: Board Actions of April 19, 1995
Following is a list of actions taken by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on April 19,
1995:
Agenda Item No.1. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order at 7:06 p.m., by the
Chairman, Mr. Perkins.
Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. There were
none.
Agenda Item No.5. Consent Agenda. Motion was offered by Mrs. Humphris, seconded by
Mrs. Thomas, to approve items 5.1 through 5.2b, and to accept the remaining items as information.
Item 5.1. Revision to Personnel Policy on Voluntary Early Retirement Incentive Plan (P-63).
APPROVED the attached Personnel Policy.
Item 5.2. Statement of Expenses for the Department of Finance, Sheriff, Commonwealth's
Attorney, Regional Jail and Clerk, Circuit Court, for the month of March, 1995.
APPROVED.
*
Printed on recycled paper
To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
Date: April 24, 1995
Page: 2
Item 5.2a. Proclamation proclaiming April 23 through April 29, 1995 as National Crime
Victim's Rights Week.
APPROVED the attached Proclamation.
Item 5.2b. Proclamation proclaiming April 24 through April 28, 1995 as Building a Communi-
ty of Life-Long Learners Week.
APPROVED the attached Proclamation.
Agenda Item No.6. SP-95-0 1. Centel Cellular of Charlottesville. Public Hearing on a request
to construct a communication tower/antennas and support bldgs on 4.154 ac zoned HI at end of
Northside Dr in Northside Industrial Pk on W sd of Rt 29N approx 0.9 mi N of Rt 649. TM32,P67.
Rivanna Dist.
APPROVED SP-95-01, subject to the following conditions:
1. Tower height shall not exceed 200 feet;
2. Compliance with Section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance;
3. There shall be no lighting of the tower unless required by a federal agency. All tower
lighting shall be shielded so as to minimize visibility from the ground;
4. Staff approval of additional antennae installation. No administrative approval shall
constitute or imply support for or approval of, the location of additional towers, antennae,
etc., even if they may be part of the same network system as any antennae administra-
tively approved under this section;
5. The tower must be designed and adequate separation provided to property lines such that
in the event of structural failure, the tower and components will remain within the lease
area;
6. Tower shall be located within lease area shown on Attachment C (on file); and
7. The tower shall be disassembled and removed from the site within 90 days of the
discontinuance of the use of the tower for cellular communication purposes.
Agenda Item No.7. SP-95-02. Crestar Bank. Public Hearing on a request to modify &
expand drive-in windows for existing Crestar' Bank. Property of 1.2 ac zoned CO & EC located in NE
quadrant of Rt 29/Rio Rd. TM6l,P123A. Rio Dist.
APPROVED SP-95-02, subject to the following condition recommended by the Planning
Commission:
To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
Date: April 24, 1995
Page: 3
1. Modification of the drive-in lane entrance such that two-way traffic is permitted or that
clear signage and pavement markings are placed to indicate the intended direction of
vehicle travel.
Agenda Item No.8. SP-95-04. Centel Cellular Company of Charlottesville. Public Hearing on
a request to construct a communication tower/antennas & support bldgs on 302 ac zoned RA & EC.
TM73,P28 is the Ivy Landfill. Samuel Miller Dist.
DENIED.
Agenda Item No.9. SP-95-05. Anthony E. Champ. Public Hearing on a request to allow
more than 600 sf for on-premise sale and/or consumption of wine. Property on W sd of Rt 674
approx 800 ft S of Rt 673. TM26,P52. White Hall Dist.
APPROVED subject to the following condition:
1. Tasting area shall be limited to 1750 square feet maximum.
Agenda Item No. 10. CPA-95-02. Milton Airport Area B Study. Public Hearing on a proposal
to amend the Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan to include recommendations of the Milton
Airport "Area B" Study as stipulated in the Three Party Agreement between the County, City of
Charlottesville and the University of Virginia.
APPROVED CP A-95-02 to include the following statement in the Comprehensive Plan:
Consider the recommendations of the City/County/University Planning and Coordination
Council's Milton Airport Area "B" Study as a guide for future planning of the Milton area.
Consideration should also be given to the results/recommendations of the Milton
historic/archaeological village survey and historic context report, currently underway.
Approval includes the attached recommendations noted in the staff report on pages nine and ten,
items A through D.
Agenda Item No. 11. Request to amend County Code to allow resident fees to Parks for
nonresident County employees.
ADOPTED the attached Resolution ofIntent to set a public hearing for June 7, 1995, to amend
the County Code to allow resident fees to Parks for nonresident County employees.
Agenda Item No. 12. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
Date: April 24, 1995
Page: 4
Mrs. Humphris expressed concerns regarding the comments made at the Commonwealth
Transportation Board meeting on April 19, 1995. She said the Commonwealth Transportation Board
has not been informed by its staff and seemed to be confused about Albemarle County's position
regarding the Meadow Creek Parkway. The Board unanimously APPROVED a motion to direct staff
to draft a letter for the Chairman's signature to state that the Board's priority is the construction of the
Meadow Creek Parkway and requested that a copy be sent to each member of the Commonwealth
Transportation Board.
Mr. Marshall said a press conference will be held on Tuesday, April 25, 1995, at 2:00 p.m., on
the front steps of the County Office Building. A candidate will announce his/her intent to run for the
School Board.
Mr. Bowerman said a few months ago, the Board considered co-sponsoring with the Chamber
of Commerce and the City of Charlottesville, a luncheon that would recognize 25 businesses in the
community and their contribution to the Charlottesville/Albemarle area. At the time this was
discussed, the cost was not provided. It will cost approximately $750 for the luncheon. It seems that
the County's share, which will be $250, is a small price to pay to thank companies for their contribu-
tions to the community. The Board APPROVED a request to participate and fund one-third of the
cost of a luncheon to honor 25 business leaders of the community and their contributions.
EWC/jng
Attachments (6)
cc: Larry Davis
Rick Huff
Amelia McCulley
Patrick Mullaney
Roxanne White
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
PERSONNEL POLICY
§P-63
§P-63 VOLUNTARY EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PLAN
A. Eliqibilitv
Participants in the Albemarle County VERIP must be permanent full-time,
or permanent part-time employees eligible for benefits, and meet the
following requirements:
1. Be eligible for early or full retirement under the provisions of
the Virginia Retirement System (VRS). Part-time employees must
meet the same criteria as if covered under VRS.
2. Have been employed by Albemarle County for 10 of the last 13 years
prior to retirement, be at least 55 50 years of age and currently
employed.
3. Employees retiring under the disability provisions of VRS and/or
Social Security shall not be eligible for the VERIP.
B. Benefits
1. VERIP benefits shall be paid monthly for a period of five years
after retirement or until age 65, whichever comes first.
2. Benefits under VERIP will be calculated as follows:
a. Compute the annual VRS benefit. under p13n ^ or B 30
indicated by VR£. This computation shall include any
reductions for early VRS retirement if appropriate.
b. Recompute the annual VRS benefit with the addition of five
more years service or the number of additional years needed
to reach age 65, whichever is the lesser.
c. The difference between these two calculations shall be the
annual VERIP benefit to be paid on a monthly basis.
3. The County Executive will recommend to the board an annual
adjustment to the early retirement benefit after having been
apprised of the VRS adjustment for retirees.
4. By July 30 of each year, the Board will pay the employee the
amount of the Board's annual contribution toward an employee's
health insurance as long as the employee is covered by VERIP
benefits.
5. If the retiree returns to work in a part-time position with
Albemarle County and chooses to participate in the County's health
care program while receiving VERIP benefits, there will be no
additional Board contribution toward the individual's health
insurance.
6. VERIP stipends will continue if the retiree returns to work in a
part-time position with Albemarle County.
Amended: August 4, 1993
PROCLAMATION
NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS WEEK
WHEREAS, one violent crime is committed in America every sixteen seconds; and
WHEREAS, with thirty-five million Americans victimized in the United States each year, crime victims
are rapidly becoming a majority; and
WHEREAS, crime victims play an indispensable role in bringing offenders to justice and, thus, preventing
further violence; and
WHEREAS, as a nation devoted to liberty and justice for all, America must plant the seeds of justice to
protect and restore crime victims' rights; and
WHEREAS, harvesting justice over the past two decades has been accomplished in part by the millions of
survivors of crime, their families and advocates whose commitment and spirit has persevered
while confronting an increasingly violent nation; and
WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle Victim-Witness Assistance Program is joining forces with victim
service programs, criminal justice officials and concerned citizens throughout Virginia and
America to observe National Crime Victims' Rights Week;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
that I, Walter F. Perkins, Chairman, on behalf of the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors,
do hereby designate the week of April 23 through April 29, 1995, as VICTIMS'
RIGHTS WEEK in the County of Albemarle, and reaffirms the commitment to address
victims' rights and criminal justice issues during 1995 and throughout the year.
újaL~ -7R~
WALTER F. PERKINS, CHAIRMAN
ALBEMARLE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS
BUIWING A COMMUNITY OF liFE-LONG LEARNERS WEEK
WHEREAS, we believe that the pursuit of literacy and learning is integral to the success and growth of our
community; and
WHEREAS, we believe all workers should have the opportunity to acquire the skills needed to adapt to a
global economy through public and private educational, vocational, technical, workplace or
other programs; and
WHEREAS, we support exzstzng programs dedicated to adult learning in our community including
Albemarle County Adult and Community Education, Blue Ridge English as a Second
Language, Charlottesville-Albemarle Technical Education Center, Charlottesville Public
Schools Adult Education, Charlottesville-Albemarle Literacy Volunteers of America, Jefferson-
Madison Regional Library and Piedmont Virginia Community College; and
WHEREAS, we believe that the expansion of these programs is critical to effectively meeting the needs of
the growing number of adult learners; and
WHEREAS, every major American business needs to be involved in strengthening the connection between
education and work;
NO~ 71lEREFORE,
We, Walter F. Perkins, Chairman, on behalf of the Albemarle Board of
County Supervisors, and David J. Toscano, Mayor of the City of
Charlottesville, do hereby proclaim the week of April 24 through April 28,
1995, as the second annual "BUIWING A COMMUNITY OF
liFE-LONG lEARNERS WEEK" in the Charlottesville-Albemarle
area, and do call upon our citizens to observe this week with appropriate
programs and other activities.
WALTER F. PERKINS, CHAIRMAN
ALBEMARLE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS
DA VID J. TOSCANO, MA YOR
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
'-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4- JJ-L~q?
,.
AGENDA TITLE:
Amendment to Personnel Policy P-63 - Voluntary Early Retirement
Incentive Plan
AGENDA DATE:
April 19, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
'15.0J41Cf ·[5 · j)
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECfIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Revision to Personnel Policy on Voluntary Early Retirement
Incentive Plan (P-63)
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACfION: X INFORMATION:
ATI'ACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONTACf(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Brandenburger
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The Voluntary Early Retirement Incentive Program (VERIP) provides employees who retire before age 65 two incentives. The first is
a monthly stipend for a maximum of five years and the second is a lumpsum payment each year equivalent to the Board's contribution to
health insurance. The VERIP eligibility criteria stipulates an employee must:
(1) Be eligible for full or early retirement under the Virginia Retirement System;
(2) Have been employed by Albemarle County for 10 of the last 13 years, and be at least 55 years of age.
Until May of 1994, the earliest a person could retire under VRS had been age 55, except for law enforcement personnel who could retire
at age 50. This past month Governor Allen signed legislation that now allows any employee covered under VRS to retire as early as age
50 if they have at least 10 years ofVRS service. This plan is referred to as the "50/10" program. If an eligible person retires between 50
and 55 their monthly VRS benefit will be reduced, for the lifetime benefit will be the same but would now be spread out over a greater
number of years.
This change is 'cost neutral' to VRS and the County and thus does not require any formal action by the Board. However, if an individual
retires between 50 and 55 they would not be eligible for VERIP because our policy stipulates the person must be age 55.
DISCUSSION:
The attached policy revision changes the VERIP eligibility to coincide with the age criteria under VRS. It also clarifies that the VERIP
program is available to both full-time and part-time permanent employees. It is the intent that part-time employees be eligible for VERIP
if they meet the eligibility criteria as if they were in VRS. The VERIP benefits would still be limited to no more than five (5) years. Paying
VERIP benefits at an earlier age would be less costly than paying them at age 55 because the benefit is a function of the annual salary of
the employee at retirement.
Employees may be seriously considering the VRS "50/10" program and their decision may be contingent on the availability ofVERIP
benefits. There are only II County employees who the meet "50/1 0" criteria. In order to allow adequate notification and staff planning,
the proposed change is being presented for Board consideration at this time. The School Board adopted this policy change on April 3,
1995.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the proposed revisions to Policy P-63.
venp.exe
95.061
~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
PERSONNEL POLICY
§P-63
§P-63 VOLUNTARY EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PLAN
A. Eliqibilitv
Participants in the Albemarle County VERIP must be permanent full-time,
or permanent part-time employees eligible for benefits, and meet the
following requirements:
1. Be eligible for early or full retirement under the provisions of
the Virginia Retirement System (VRS). Part-time employees must
meet the same criteria as if covered under VRS.
2. Have been employed by Albemarle County for 10 of the last 13 years
prior to retirement, be at least 55 50 years of age and currently
employed.
3. Employees retiring under the disability provisions of VRS and/or
Social Security shall not be eligible for the VERIP.
B. Benefits
1. VERIP benefits shall be paid monthly for a period of five years
after retirement or until age 65, whichever comes first.
2. Benefits under VERIP will be calculated as follows:
a. Compute the annual VRS benefit. under pl~n ~ or n ~o
indicated by VR£. This computation shall include any
reductions for early VRS retirement if appropriate.
b. Recompute the annual VRS benefit with the addition of five
more years service or the number of additional years needed
to reach age 65, whichever is the lesser.
c. The difference between these two calculations shall be the
annual VERIP benefit to be paid on a monthly basis.
3. The County Executive will recommend to the board an annual
adjustment to the early retirement benefit after having been
apprised of the VRS adjustment for retirees.
4. By July 30 of each year, the Board will pay the employee the
amount of the Board's annual contribution toward an employee's
health insurance as long as the employee is covered by VERIP
benefits.
5. If the retiree returns to work in a part-time position with
Albemarle County and chooses to participate in the County's health
care program while receiving VERIP benefits, there will be no
additional Board contribution toward the individual's health
insurance.
6. VERIP stipends will continue if the retiree returns to work in a
part-time position with Albemarle County.
Amended: August 4, 1993
.~
PERSONNEL
§P-63
Voluntary Earlv Retirement Incentive Plan (continued)
C. Application
Applications for VERIP must be made to the County Executive prior to
December 1st of the year preceding the fiscal year the VERIP takes
effect.
D. Approval
The Board, on the recommendation of the County Executive, must approve
all those who will participate in the VERIP.
E. Duration
1. Once an employee has been approved for VERIP, the benefits will
continue without interruption as outlined in this policy.
Subsequent alterations or deletion of this policy shall not affect
the benefits of those who have retired under these provisions.
2. This policy automatically continues on Hay 1 unless the Board acts
to discontinue the policy for the year.
TO: STATE COMPENSATION BOARD
4-1L/~q5
q5 .ó'-llq{6·~)
FOR: MONTH OF MARCH, 1995
DEPARTMENT COUNTY STATE TOTAL
SHARE SHARE
Department of
Finance -0- -0- -0-
Sheriff -0- 2,213.74 2,213.74
Commonwealth's
Attorney -0- 705.60 705.60
Regional Jail -0- -0- -0-
Clerk, Circuit Court -0- 1,784.99 1,784.99
NOTE:
Expenses listed above are only those office
which the State Compensation Board has
participate, and are not the total office
these departments.
expenses in
agreed to
expenses of
I'
"
/.<ç-
<:J../ ~ I
A;1cnd..o
~=!\.- ¿ #. I
i - t }1'\.' '~ j.'( >t 13 (S, 2ð..)
I'
'- ,
PROCLAMATION
NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS WEEK
WHEREAS, one violent crime is committed in America every sixteen seconds; and
WHEREAS, with thirty-five million Americans victimized in the United States each year, crime victims
are rapidly becoming a majority; and
WHEREAS, crime victims play an indispensable role in bringing offenders to justice and, thus, preventing
further violence; and
WHEREAS, as a nation devoted to liberty and justice for all, America must plant the seeds of justice to
protect and restore crime victims' rights; and
WHEREAS, harvesting justice over the past two decades has been accomplished in part by the millions of
survivors of crime, their families and advocates whose commitment and spirit has persevered
while confronting an increasingly violent nation; and
WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle Victim-Witness Assistance Program is joining forces with victim
service programs, criminal justice officials and concerned citizens throughout Virginia and
Amen'ca to observe National Crime Victims'Rights Week;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED,
that I, Walter F. Perkins, Chairman, on behalf of the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors,
do hereby designate the week of April 23 through April 29, 1995, as VICTIMS'
RIGHTS WEEK in the County of Albemarle, and reaffirms the commitment to address
victims' rights and criminal justice issues during 1995 and throughout the year.
I
)
, i....¡___
/' /
') '- - ¡OJ
'-'7 /. (.\
---.------ ¡ -;:"-
/...... -j
z../'~ ~J....,
WALTER F. PERKINS, CHAIRMAN
ALBEMARLE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS
.. ,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Police Department
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5807
March 30, 1995
,~
,'''~:U
The Honorable Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Perkins:
The annual observance of National Crime victims' Rights Week is
planned for April 23 to April 29, 1995. During this commemorative
week, crime victims, their advocates and organizations which serve them
will join together in Virginia to educate citizens about crime and
victimization, and encourage their support to improve victims' rights
and services.
As Director of the Albemarle County Victim/Witness Assistance
Program, I would appreciate it if you could sponsor an official
proclamation to recognize April 23 to April 29 as "Crime victims'
Rights Week in Albemarle County". Such a proclamation will emphasize
your commitment to this important cause, and recognize the efforts of
those who serve victims of crime in our community/state.
I have enclosed an example proclamation. Please feel free to use
it to help compose a proclamation for Albemarle County.
If you have any questions concerning this request, the sample
proclamation or National Crime victims' Rights Week, please call me at
(804) 296-5830.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. We truly
appreciate your support of crime victims and their concerns.
Sincerely,
J~{)lo~_~
Susan M. Painter
Program Coordinator
Victim/Witness Assistance
Ie
Enclosure
,
Whereas,
Whereas,
Whereas,
Whereas,
Whereas,
Whereas,
Therefore, be it
Resolved,
Resolved,
SAMPLE PROCLAMATION
one violent crime is committed in America every 16
seconds; and
with 35 million Americans victimized in the United
states each year, crime victims are rapidly
becoming a majority; and
crime victims play an indispensable role in
bringing offenders to justice and, thus, preventing
further violence; and
as a nation devoted to liberty and justice for all,
America must plant the seeds of justice to protect
and restore crime victims' rights; and
harvesting justice over the past two decades has
been accomplished in part by the millions of
survivors of crime, their families and advocates
whose commitment and spirit has persevered while
confronting an increasingly violent nation; and
Albemarle county Victim/Witness Assistance Program
is joining forces with victim service programs,
criminal justice officials and concerned citizens
throughout Virginia and America to observe National
Crime Victims' Rights Week;
that Walter Perkins, Chairman, Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors, designates the week of April
23 to April 29, 1995 as victims' Rights Week in
Albemarle County; and be it further
that Walter Perkins, Chairman, Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors, reaff irms a commi tment to
address victims' rights and criminal justice
issues during 1995 Crime victims' Rights Week and
throughout the year.
WALTER F. PERKINS, CHAIRMAN
ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
DATE
-.
J::;,1~i:· ~j-¿) ;:v~ .('"1 ~ I
7{q ,::A..LtL /~~ '}1. # , ):: . j'
¿
¡
1 (S.2b)
BUIWING A COMMUNTrY OF liFE-LONG LEARNERS WEEK
WHEREAS, we believe that the pursuit of literacy and learning is integral to the success and growth of our
community; and
WHEREAS, we believe all workers should have the opportunity to acquire the skills needed to adapt to a
global economy through public and private educational, vocational, technical, workplace or
other programs; and
WHEREAS, we support existing programs dedicated to adult learning in our community including
Albemarle County Adult and Community Education, Blue Ridge English as a Second
Language, Charlottesville-Albemarle Technical Education Center, Charlottesville Public
Schools Adult Education, Charlottesville-Albemarle Literacy Volunteers of America, Jefferson-
Madison Regional Library and Piedmont Virginia Community College; and
WHEREAS, we believe that the expansion of these programs is critical to effectively meeting the needs of
the growing number of adult learners; and
WHEREAS, every major American business needs to be involved in strengthening the connection between
education and work;
NOW, illEREFORE,
We, Walter F. Perkins, Chairman, on behalf of the Albemarle Board of
County Supervisors, and David J. Toscano, Mayor of the City of
Charlottesville, do hereby proclaim the week of April 24 through April 28,
1995, as the second annual "BUIlDING A COMMUNITY OF
liFE-LONG LEARNERS WEEK" in the Charlottesville-Albemarle
area, and do call upon our citizens to observe this week with appropriate
programs and other activities.
WALTER F. PERKINS, CHAIRMAN
ALBEMARLE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS
DA VID J. TOSCANO, MA YOR
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
ABGÁ FINANCIAL SERVICES. INC.
-=::. ¡ '£ "",,-~ ~¡. "-:)(....--, ,/ . . / "--:" ..
C:r:. 1 ,,, . j, iJ.C' .' .. .d' ::.. +)
I~,.(i LA.£L ::,¡..- .t ¡o- ./' :,' I . ~ '. ) .
CirO. BOX 334
BELCAMP, MAR~'LAND ZI~,
410.)7S74t i ( !:¡
,.
April 12, 1995
..
"T"
FAX 410;27J·')524
APH 14gø
--.--.-----,....,....,..-,...
ED OF SUPE!iV1C -
~ _..... ~... 7 ",,""'.~.h. ·'ö .._~,~ -
Mr. Bob Richardson
Sovran Bank, N.A.
Post Office Box 26904
Richmond, Virginia 23261
Re: Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.)
Dear Mr. Richardson:
Enclosed please find the Bond Program Report and Monthly Report
Pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Deed Restrictions for the month
of March 1995.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me
at 410-575-7412.
Sincerely,
~~~
Sheila H. Moynihan
Project Monitor
/shm
enclosures
cc: Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
Effective March 31, 1995
MONTHLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 7(a) OF THE DEED RESTRICTIONS
TO: ABG Associates, Inc.
300 E. Lcmbard Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
RE: Hydraulic Road Apartments - Aroor Crest ApartIre.nts
Charlottesville, Virginia
Pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Deed Restrictions (the -Deed
Restrictions-), as defined in an Indenture of Trust dated as of
April 1, 1983, between the Industrial Development Authority of
Albemarle County, Virginia (the -Authority-), and your bank, as
trustee, the undersigned author ized representative of
Richmond-Albemarle Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited
Partnership (the -Purchaser-), hereby certifies with respect to
the operation and management of Hydraulic Road Apartments,
Charlottesville, Virginia (the -Project-), that as of the date
shown below:
1) The number of units in the Project occupied by
lower income tenants is 18 .
2) The number of units in the Project unoccupied and
held available for Lower Income Tenants is -0-
3) The number of units rented and the number of units
held available for rental other than as described in
(1) and (2) is 48 .
4) The percentage that the number of units described in
(1) and (2) hereof constitute of the total number of
units in the Project is 27% .
5) The information contained in this report is true,
accurate and correct as of the date hereof.
6) As of the date hereof, the Purchaser is not in
default under any covenant or agreement contained
in the Deed Restrictions or in an Agreement of Sale
dated as of April 1, 1983, between the Authority and
the Purchaser.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Report as of
April 5, 1995 ,~
RICHMOND-ALBEMARLE LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, a Virginia
limited partnership
By: ~--' y ¿~::¿z-
Au horized Repr sentatlve
SONO PROGRAM "~PCRT
MonU\ March YNr ~
Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.) Pro;.ct .: 051-35371
Prope"Y:
r Charlottesville, VA Number 0' Unita 66
lOca Ion:
S",þmln.CI by: Loretta Wyatt April 5, 1995 Effective 3/31/95
t.4af\&;.r Cat.
Total Occupied 66
LOWE" iNCOME Bond Occupied 18
I.
the 'ollowlng unl'l '\lYe been Clt'slgn.al.d as "lower Ineom." unl'S
2 Arbor Crest Dr 21 Betty N. Meador 41 11.
2 4 Arbor Crest Dr 22 Beverly T. Lane 42 62.
6 Arbor Crest Dr 23 Wilma M. Atkinson 0
3 63.
4 7 Arbor Crest Dr 24 Florence Lee Carey 44 ...
S 9 Arbor Crest Dr 25 Virginia Burton 45 ~.
6 12 Arbor Crest Dr 26 G. Robert Stone 4ð 01.
7 14 Arbor Crest Dr 21 Betty L. Reed 47 17.
a 20 Arbor Crest Dr 2a Evelyn Mandeville 4a 61
9 30 Arbor Crest Dr 29 Mary Cox Allen 49 H.
10 44 Arbor Crest Dr ~O Sam M. Atherton SO 70.
U 56 Arbor Crest Dr 3' Violet DuCharme ~1
71.
12. 76 Arbor Crest Dr 32 Ann G. Saylor 52 72
13 78 Arbor Crest Dr ~3 Ernest M. Nease 53 73.
14 84 Arbor Crest Dr ~4 Juanita Boliek 54 74.
IS 90 Arbor Crest Dr 35 Betty B. Elliott 55 75.
16 92 Arbor Crest Dr 36 Dorothy H. Reese ~ 7&.
11 94 Arbor Crest Dr :\7 Sarah E. Fischer 57 77.
18 106 Arbor Crest Dr JI Katherine T. Nowlen 5ð.
71.
19 39 59 71.
20 40 60 10.
Tt\& e".n~s "om p'ewlous 't'P(ut ,,,lIeeted in !h. abow. tesllng a,.
O.I.llona Addl1lon.a
H 1 11.
2 12 2 12.
3 13 3 13
4 14 4. 14.
5 15 $ 15.
6 16 6 1&
7 \1 7 17.
a " I. 11..
. I' t ".
\0 20 10. 20.
THOMAS J. BULEY, JR.
7TH DISTRICT, VIRGINIA
.,')1 :"::c"- -() ''''v-; ¿~. /'
_)l ;/ '.' IL--,- , H
<- ". I Un-:Þ :::ì - .
f¿r-n.JiLL r jyvt~ '---:/)' I}
,
~ I ,_5 ~.lGTON OFFICE
2241 RAYBURN OFFICE BUILDING
12021 225-2815
CHAIRMAN, COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
Q:ongrr55 of thr iinítrd ~tatr5
!~ouse of 'Represmtatiues
i1111ashinl1ton, Ð<t 20515-tö07
DISTRICT OFFICES:
SUITE 101
4914 FITZHUGH AVENUE
RICHMOND, VA 23230-3534
18041771-2809
1-18001-438-3793
April 5, 1995
CULPEPER OFFICE PARK
SUITE 207
763 MADISON ROAD
(I II PEPER, VA 22701-3342
....._----'-
.. ,; ~ f~,..t ~~L.IT~31 82~960
Mr. Robert W. Tucker
County Executive, County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
¡ 98
_.p.",..,.,.",,"'. '-0-.";.'- .
,."....--.....-.-;
Dear Mr. Tucker:
Thank you for contacting me regarding Section 18 (5311)
federal funding for transit programs. I appreciate you taking the
time to share your views.
The House recently passed H.R. 1158, the Emergency
Supplemental Rescissions Bill by a vote of 227-200. You may be
pleased to learn, however, that the House did not rescind Section
18 funding. H.R. 1158 is now before the Senate which has the
option of accepting the House version or amending the legislation.
Thank you again for contacting me regarding this matter. If
Section 18 funding is addressed on the House floor in the future, I
will be sure to keep your views in mind. With kindest regards, I
am
Sincerely,
_11'-' 1A/---·
Thomas . Bliley, Jr.
Membe of Congress
_w__-
TJBj/aco
COUNTY OF ALBEMARle
~ rE·::J~1"'! fT-i nn tn-r:1 ,.,.-¡ ¡"1\
r¡1 . I '._"C'." .,...... ""'.....-..t.. ' ¡
1 ~ + ..t'fl ,\'
\)\7\ ¡ \ II
~/!, APR 171995 \1 ¡ II
if\\\ '¡-.,_.wu...., . ,- ~".!-r.- ~~ lUJ· U'
I \ ¡ \..-. \ ..~, '. ;. ..J' u
u '-......... \..,""_..~,_~_ :-....._.. .
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
._ \ It
~
Peter W. Schmidt
Director
fH¡ I 1995
p. 0 Box 10009
Richmond, Virginia 23240-0009
(804) 762-4000
Ms. Katherine E. Slaughter
Southern Environmental Law Center
201 West Main Street, Suite 14
Charlottesville, VA 22901-5064
Re: Exceptional Waters Nomination
Dear Ms. Slaughter:
The State Water Control Board (Board) has received and
reviewed 33 nominations from the public for consideration for
designation under the Exceptional Waters category of the State
Water Quality Standards (VR 680-21-01.3.C). The Board at its
regularly scheduled meeting on March 28, 1995 decided to process
all nominations as petitions pursuant to the Code of Virginia,
Section 9-6.14:7.1, including those received prior to the Code
change effective July 1, 1993.
Additionally, the Board decided not to initiate or complete
rulemakings on any of the 33 petitions. This action was taken
because the Board has requested revisions to the regulation which
would change the designation process to formally include the
participation of affected local governments and private property
owners. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) staff are
reviewing possible revision of the agency guidance that defines
the eligibility criteria of those water bodies nominated.
Accordingly, your nomination(s} of Moormans River and Two
Segments of the Upper Rappahannock River will not be processed
any further at this time. The staff will notify you of the
revised procedure and criteria when they are final so you may
evaluate submittal of your petition(s} based on the new guidance.
Although you may resubmit your petition(s} at any time, we
encourage you to wait until you have received this notification
from staff of the final changes. If you provide a written
request, we will retain your petition(s} and upon finalization of
these changes - deem it to be a new petition and consider the
petition under the amended regulation.
629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 - Fax (804) 762-4500 - TOO (804) 762-4021
· Îa .
Thank you for your interest in Exceptional Waters program
activities in Virginia. If you have any questions about the
process outlined above, please do not hesitate to contact Mrs.
Jean W. Gregory in the Office of Environmental Standards and
Research. Mrs. Gregory may be reached at (804) 762-4113.
Yours truly,
Peter W. Schmidt
KCD/jpb
cc: Albemarle County
Culpeper County
Fauquier County
City of Fredericksburg
Rappahannock County
Spotsylvania County
Stafford County
·
,
.f
Acme
- .'\1'",.-- "-'-T' .-){ L. - .
r )\ d () - - "
;'Sj ~~1..u f1tn ~ tþ ~ S <>t "
')
-éS' ~)
Design Technology, Co.
Tel: 804-823-4351
Fax: 804-823-1625
1000 Allview Drive, Craze!, VA 22932
April 14, 1995
Ms. Ella W. Carey
Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Ms. Carey:
,. '.' ,......- '''-''''''~--'-' "-". ~
(i' í;:! I] TIP i'
1 t~ I \!f It
...""...---...........,.""->-~.. .,.
1\,OR , 791i
.. - ^"<~......"...
D OF SUPEF"
y...'."".... ".".,-
The following is Acme Design Technology, Co.'s January and February 1995 operating
results:
Sales 8l Marketing
Our January and February bookings were below our 1995 plan. Our shipments were right
at our plan projections or slighdy ahead. The reason was that our December bookings were
81 % over our plan and thus we had the workload for the factory and orders ahead of our
bookings forecast.
Note the next four charts for performance to plan and last year:
Products
JANUARY 1995
Plan Actual
DataVue
Visible Steel
Product Service
Storage Products
FreightIMiscellaneous
OEM
$ 6,000
$ 85,000
$ 45,000
$ 300,000
$ 15,000
$ 50,000
$501,000
Totals
$ 11,064
$ 81,498
$ 33,012
$267,152
$ 16,999
$ 30,587
$440,312
Variance
$ 5,064
($ 3,502)
($ 11,988)
($ 32,848)
$ 1,999
($ 19,413)
($60,688)
84.4%
( 4.1 %)
( 26.6%)
( 11.0%)
13.3%
(38.8%)
(12.1%)
Products
FEBRUARY 1995
Plan Actual
DataVue
Visible Steel
Product Service
Storage Products
Freight/Miscellaneous
OEM
$ 5,000
$ 45,000
$ 40,000
$ 360,000
$ 15,000
$ 150,000
$615,000
Totals
$ 2,852
$ 46,393
$ 23,163
$ 208,493
$ 14,050
$ 71,528
$366,479
Variance
($ 2,148)
$ 1,393
($ 16,837)
($ 151,507)
($ 950)
($ 78,472)
($248,521)
(43.0%)
3.1%
(42.1%)
(42.1 %)
( 6.3%)
(52.3%)
(40.4%)
.
. .
, J
FEBRUARY 1995 YEAR-TO-DATE
Products Plan Actual Variance
DataVue $ 11,000 $ 13,916 $ 2,916 26.5%)
Visible Steel $ 130,000 $ 127,891 ($ 2,109) ( 1.6%)
Product Service $ 85,000 $ 56, 1 75 ($ 28,825) ( 33.9%)
Storage Products $ 660,000 $ 475,645 ($ 184,355) ( 27.9%)
FreightIMiscellaneous $ 30,000 $ 31,049 $ 1,049 3.5%
OEM $ 200,000 $ 102,11 5 ($ 97,885) (48.9%)
Totals $1,116,000 $806,791 ($309,209) (27.7%)
Two Months 94 vs. Two Months 95
Products 2 Mo. 94 2 Mo. 95 Variance
DataVue $ 8,552 $ 13,916 $ 5,364 62.7%
Visible Steel $ 103,424 $ 127,891 $ 24,467 23.7%
Product Service $ 61,774 $ 56,1 75 ($ 5,599) ( 9.1 %)
Storage Products $ 355,118 $ 475,645 $120,527 33.9%
FreightIMiscellaneous $ 17,985 $ 31,049 $ 13,064 72.6%
OEM $ 187,912 $ 102,115 ($ 85,797) (45.7%)
Totals $734,765 5806,791 $72,026 9.8%
The following is our quote log for January, February and year-to-date:
QUOTE LOG SUMMARY
Total Total Quotes Dates
Quotes Unworkable Workable Turned PO's
Month Received Quotes Quotes Into PO's Received
Jan. 95 74 1 73 7 1 fSept. 94
1 fOct. 94
lINov. 94
3fDec. 94
1/Jan. 95
Feb. 95 . 86 7 79 8 1fApr. 94
4fDec. 94
2l]an. 95
1 fFeb. 95
YTD 95: 160 8 152 15
Next month, I will be changing this quote log to dollars. Currently, we have in excess of
. .
$4,000,000 of quotes outstandIng. This does not Include any OEM quotes.
Manufacturing, Materials at Equipment:
We are making slight progress in our factory efficiency and productivity. The results are far
too slow in corning. The labor force frankly has been mismanaged in the past. They were
rewarded for poor performance and now expect to be rewarded for nothing.
f
..
We are finding many good people that want to work. This, I believe, will help us to get the
old employees to become better performers.
Our material is in excellent position. We have had quality problems with Edgcomb Steel
for the last three months. We are sending some steel back. We need to refuse shipment
on more of what they are sending us.
At this time, our equipment is all operational. One piece of equipment that becomes
overloaded is our 400-ton Cincinnati Break. We have enough breaks but we only have the
one big tonnage break.
Engineering 8l Quality:
Engineering work load remains high. We are working on some product improvements for
our Magic Aisle product line such as a passive locking device. We have completed our field
test of our pullout drawers for our mobile systems.
Our quality remains very high. Our in-house rejects continue to decline. We have made
progress in our Paint Department over the last six months. I believe our reject rate for
paint is the lowest it has been in years.
OEM:
Our OEM business fell off in January and February. We have two major accounts that are
having problems. Figgie Fire Protection is for sale and we have not been receiving many
orders. We are not painting for them as they have excess inventory of those products.
Also, Inova's business has been very soft. They have engineering work but no volume
projects going on at this time. Later this year they expect to see some contract awards.
We have won a bid for the City of New York for 158 cabinets for the Metropolitan
Museum of Art negative archives. The purchase order has not been released yet as the
engineering staff must review our design. The contract is for $239,528 which would put
us ahead of our plan.
Financials:
Our over-90-day accounts increased from year end:
Days:
0-30
31-60
61-90
91-999
Total
$
0/0
$769,495
55.4%
$342,937
24.7%
$75,582
5.5%
$199,907
14.4%
$1,387.921
100%
Note Attachment A for complete details of the major over-90-day accounts.
Other:
Enclosed is a copy of our newsletter that was sent to all our dealers today. It will give you
more details on what is happening at and with Acme Design Technology, Co.
Also enclosed is a copy of our 1995 projections. You will receive, under separate cover,
our 1995 Business Plan.
Sincerely,
ACME DESIGN TECHNOLOGY, CO.
~JJ. df
Thomas D. Hall
President
ahd
Enclosures
ATTACHMENT A
February 28, 1995
1. Absolute Filing Solutions $20,243 Former master distributor.
2. Alpha Systems $10,520 Turned over to collection agency. Have
personal guarantee.
3. Commercial Products Company $21,352 Has been turned over to a collection
agency. Suit in process.
4. Hagiazo-Systematic Storage $64,239 Judgment issued for Acme. Earning
1 0% interest.
5. lFI Associates $ 5,353 Slow pay. Turned over to collection.
6. Medical Forms & Equipment $11,446 Have personal guarantee. Attorney is
working on. Seeking judgment.
7. New England Visible $ 6,218 $1 OOO/month plus commissions. Will
work out.
8. Osborne Office Systems $29,891 We have picked up product from this
account that has not been credited as yet.
Will not cover total due Acme.
9. Remstar International $ 2,775 Taxes; due for various states.
10. Star Production Services $ 9,305 Judgment issued for $ 16,000.
11. Turner Construction Company $16,053 Acme has been paid for this product.
This is installation money that will be
passed on to our dealer when complete.
------------
Sub Total: $197,395 98.7%
Grand Total: $199,907 100%
r \
¡¡ ~ þun
ACME DESIGN TECHNOLOGY, CO.
Crozet, VA
Date:
April 14, 1995
To:
ACME DEALERS
The first quarter of 1995 has been an active and exciting one for Acme and we look forward to building
momentum with you throughout 1995!
Acme Newsbriefs
Bruce Chase has joined the Acme Sales & Marketing team to give us broader industry experience. He hails
from Staycor and Direct Line where he was the architect of their national sales and marketing plan. Since
December, Bruce has traveled and met with Acme dealers and customers in New York, the Northeast, the
Mid-Atlantic, and California. He has kicked off a partnership program of training and supporting filing
systems specialists in contract furniture dealerships. He will host a 12-member dealer council meeting the
first weekend in May. If you have not spoken with Bruce personally yet, please give him a call at 1-800-
368-3275.
Matt Dillon moved into corporate offices in Crozet as National Service Manager in January. Matt and
Mary Sue Rorrer have been very busy reorganizing National Service with a focus on customer satisfaction
every time. New contracts have been sent out to our independent contractors and Matt will be penning a
quarterly newsletter focusing on service and engineering changes that will benefit field installers. Matt has
requested written installation reports -- the more feedback Acme has, both positive and negative -- the
quicker we can facilitate change.
A number of upgrade packages have been designed for older Acme Magic Aisles. If you are interested in
this excellent way to contact previous customers and build a profitable revenue stream, please call Matt at 1-
800-422-5577.
Patty Pugh, National Trainer and Mid-Atlantic Regional Manager, continues her travels throughout the
country, training office staff, making sales calls with account executives, and providing dealer support
wherever needed. Over 30 states were visited in 1994 by Acme management.
Scott Hendrix and Charlie Hanger continue to work on product enhancements, custom applications, and
the introduction of new products. Pullout drawers for mobiles have now been field tested and repeat orders
received.
GSA Contract GS-28F-1048C for High Density Filing and Storage Products was awarded February
1, 1995. The discounts, commissions and products offered are the best ever! The Acme Retrieval Center is
included on the contract, so a complete line of storage products is available in one catalog. In addition to all
federal offices, many states are issuing contracts based on GSA. Check out your state if you aren't already
on board.
Congratulations to Pro/File of Denver for their exceptional efforts in building a national corporate account.
On March 4-5, 1995, they brought representatives from Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado to
Charlottesville for a whirlwind tour of "Jefferson's Country" on Sunday and a factory tour and presentation
on Monday. Thanks for an opportunity to "showoff"!
,
Acme's Flexoline systems have a new application in backing up a 911 Emergency System. Thanks to Jim
Heckman and John Bolling of AVR Business Systems, Inc., Pottstown, PA who installed two double
tiered stands, 900 frames and 7,200 sheets of Flexoline and ten cabinets!
We have expanded our international reach with Joe Devlin of Infotrieve Systems Ltd., Scotland. Joe
visited Acme in December and his second container of ARCS has just cast off on its transatlantic journey!
Our hats are off to Ed King of Business Products 8I Design, Monroe, LA for an extremely successful
installation. He filled four vaults 36' x 42' each with 820 Magic Aisles for a large mortgage processing
facility. Ed drove from Louisiana to Acme with the order and a check! Nice business!
Acme's newly designed 820 mobile golf club storage is a star attraction at "Old York" Country Club's grand
opening of its new clubhouse. Designed by Scott Hendrix and sold by Jack Breuer of Visible Systems,
it's the newest offering in Acme's product line.
Keep your eyes open for custom applications like the special negative archival storage cabinets designed for
the NYC Metropolitan Museum of Art. Acme won the contract for 158 cabinets with special ventilation
and waterproof characteristics.
On a somber note, Acme was saddened by the death of Frederick R. Robbins, Jr., age 57, on January
12, 1995. Fred retired from Acme just one year ago and returned to his home in Bryn Mawr, PA. Fred
served in various capacities with Acme for over 27 years. As a product line manager for storage products,
Fred was an innovator in the design of visible and vertical storage and retrieval equipment and mobile
shelving. He was intimately involved in the design and development of the "Magic Aisle". Our sympathy is
extended to his wife Sharon and daughter Heather and his many friends and associates.
Acme is a winner with customers. A 1994 study by the Wayman Group for Managing Office
Technology casts a very favorable light on Acme:
Overall, customer satisfaction places Acme at 8.7 out of 10 versus the average of the top 4 at 7.8.
Acme ranks as the fifth largest mobile manufacturer and we believe we are closing fast on third and
fourth!
If you would like further details of the study, give me a call.
Upgrade your image for spring. Take advantage of our I'Showroom Special". (See enclosed flyer.)
We have pledged to hold our prices despite growing pressure on material price increases. We are prepared
to handle large orders and offer the quickest turnaround in the industry. Shipping lead times are 3-4 weeks
with any color request. For "Quick Ship" help, call Debbie Brown at 1-800-368-3275. Keep looking for
opportunities and let Acme help turn them into dollars!
The following field staff and reps are ready to help you:
Field Staff:
Robert McShane
6 McLeod Street
Massapequa Park, NY 11 762
Tel: 516-541-6853
Mickey Ryan
8104 Fletcher Green
Buena Park, CA 90621
Tel: 714-523-5565
Patty Pugh
Customer Service, Crozet
1 -800-368-3275
Tom Newton
734 Dushea Court
Kennesaw, GA 301 44
Tel: 404-955-1752
I
ReJlli
KMA - Ohio and Eastern Pennsylvania
Ken Altiero
1584 Tamarisk Trail
Poland, OH 44514
Tel: 216-757-8899
Tim Byce
900 Oakside Lane
Pittsburgh, PA 15229
Tel: 412-366-9412
Kate Joyce
3653 Columbus Avenue
Cincinnati, OH 45208
Tel: 513-533-9515
Systems Plus - Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee
Mark Clark at Lamar Burton
11 400 Decimal Drive
Louisville, KY 40299
Tel: 502-267-7441 (KY & TN)
J. C. Morton
711 0 Blackhawk Lane
Ft. Wayne, IN 46815
Tel: 219-486-4621
Acme anticipates additional field appointments/partnerships in the future.
Finding new and exciting applications for high density storage makes every day an exciting challenge. Let our
creative staff of engineers and sales support personnel help you turn ideas into dollars. After all, filing is an
every day business and we need to be involved every day!
We are looking fOlWard to your calls.
Happy Selling!
~OJcY~
Deanna L. Hall
Vice President - Strategic & Product Planning
:6,
Thomas D. Hall
President
ahd
Enclosure
ACME RETRIEVAL CENTER
II ARC II
SPRING SHOWROOM SPECIAL
April 1 5 · June 1 51 1 995 · 60% Discount
The Arc is being heralded for its ease of installation, quiet smooth ride and the
best overall quality among all rotary files in the marketplace.
Now is the time to Ilshow it off" in your office -- it can even provide valuable
storage and workspace for you.
All sizes and all accessories as well as your
choice of color, or colors, from our 32
standard colors are available.
Additional units and laminates are available
but will be at normal discounts.
The ARC is on the new GSA contract and is
very popular with government agencies.
Use your personal ARC to help make sales!
Shipping time remains at 3-4 weeks.
............ ........................ ........................... : ............................................................-..
....... ....... ........... ..... ................... ..... ......................................-..................................
\9"S 055' 5£9 15.' Zl Sl,'Ol Sl6 'Sl m'9l 50t'85 son, ns'09 .onz 6l£' 65 9S9' 6Z 956'1£ IOZ'9Z SiXf! aloliS - alo~ul 1iN
--....--... -..--..... ------ ...--_.... -......... -.. .......................-.. --...-...- -...-.....- .....-....... _......-.. ............. --..-....-.. -- -.. ..--..-..-.. - ....-..- ....-....- ....-
\S£'O- 009'SZ) 0 0 0 0 5£5'£) (m'£) (m'£) m'r) (m'£) (m'r) (5£5'£) (5£5'£) (iIO~UI) If1uiij
\ZO'O l£Z'1 OOZ OOZ OOZ OOZ OOZ OOZ OOZ OOZ OOZ (95. ) m (ozt) asuidx] liQ10
un m'm 9SI'Ol m'ol m'ol .6,'01 SSS'OI m'n 1t0'U l05'n 50. 'n LL6 'n 56Z 'n O£Z'ZI iSUidx] 1SaJa1uI
\9S'6 Z£O'IH m'zs 50S'OS £H' 6S lSZ'lS SI6'59 .96 '95 lLt'S9 9£5'6Z 60.'l9 Tr9 'l£ 6S6 '6£ m'.£ ilO~ul 6Uj1fJadO 1iN
................. ............... .... -..-....-.. -.. -.... -.. - .....-..-.. -.. -..... ......- ..-....-.. ---..-..------ ..---..-- .. -......-...-...................... -.. -............ -.. - -..- -- -.. -......... - -........... -................ -.....
\5,"1 5££'9S0' 616'Z6 061'56 06 I' 56 tJ5'06 9.0' 56 m'06 m'ss £06' 06 9.1 ',S tI6 '06 m',s SI9'SS sisuadx] 6Uj1fJadO
.......-...-.... -......... - ...-..-....-...-............. ............ ..-.. ...... .....-.. .......................-....-....-.. ...........-.. ............................................. .............................. - -....... -...... -.... -.......-......
\9n sZl'm m'5, Sl,'9. Slt'9. m'5, 0£9'l. m'5, Blt'9. 619'lt ·60Z'tt m'l, 5H'tt 05. '9. iSUidx] iAj1fJ1S!U!IPV
\60"£ lOZ'm Z65 'It ZIl'S, ZTl'S' lSI'5, 9ft ' It m'5' £6l'lt ,SZ' £t l£6 '6£ 'SZ'£t l£6'6£ S9I'Z' asuadx] 6u!11 as
unz 19£'lZS' 95l'W 566 'w m"sl los'm '96 '091 9l,'m S,l'951 m'ozl m'I51 m'szl 10l'm '50'm 1 HOJd SSOJ9
.......-.....- -..-.--- .... ......-.. --.. .............. ......--....-..-.. .--..-..- .........--.........--..-.....-.. .....-..---- ...... -........ - -.. --...... -................-.. -.. ........ ...--..-.................................-.. - -........ --
\69'5l £S5'SS9'5 m'm m'm ZS9'69, tTS'm 159'm ,6S' ZS. ZZ9'W m'19' m'm m'£5. '£5'm m'm PI OS spoo9 lO 1S0J
\00'001 056'm'l m'm 501 '£Ol 519'.59 519'.59 m'm Ol£'m m'm OSS'IS5 OSS'IS5 OSS'IS5 m'm OSS'IS5 SilfS 1aN
-..-.. ................. ...... --..-.. .............. ....-......... ..-..-......-.......... ...... ..... -..-............-.................... ....-........-..... .. ...... ....-........ -- --.. -..... - - -......-.. - -....-.......... -................................... ..-.. .._-...--
un m'm m'tT m',l S95'U· S95'U S95'£1 590'U 590'£1 090 ZI 090'ZI 090'ZI m'n 090'ZI SUO!SS!"OJ
nO'1 m'Sl £Z£'L £Z£'l SIS'9 SIS'9 SIS'9 595'9 595'9 090'9 090'9 090'9 SOS'5 090'9 Si~uuol1V , SUln1aij
\II'rol 000'05l'L 000' 5Zl OOO'5Z£ 000'5l9 ooo'm 000'5l9 000'059 000'059 000' 009 000'009 000' 009 000'5l5 000' 009 salfS SSOJ9
---...--...... ..... ---...- ------ ---_..._- ------- ..--- ---....-..-..... -...-- ....-.. -.... .......... .. ....... -... -...-.. .....-.. .............- -....- --..--..-- ..... .....- ---..-..-............. -....- ........- -- ---
5661 mwmo mW]AON mom mwum !Sn9nV not ]Nnr J.VW mdV HJijVN mnmJ ÁijVnNVr
lV!O!
mons
lVNlmo NOm]rOijd
5661
ÁJrllns
s1a6pna 1uali1f1S 8Io~ul
spJo~aij alq!S!A iI~V
',~.!
tsn6 OS6'SYO'L SOY' £S9 SOY'£S9 ST9' t09 SY9'tY9 SY9'609 OL£' SSS OL£' 06S oss'm oss'm oss'm S£9' LOS OSS'TLS aJ!AJas o/~ - salfS taN
tOO'OO OS6'SYS'L SOy'£OL SOy' £OL m'tS9 m'tS9 m'm OL£'0£9 OL£' 0£9 OSS'YSS oss'm oss' YSS Sr9' LSS OSS' YSS Ir}ol - saYfS taN
---...... -------........--........ --- .....---..- ........--- --...---- --..---- --........... ........................ -- --.. --................................. ...----_.. ------.. ....--......
t6n ooo'ot~ OOO'S OOO'OY OOO'St 000' or OOO'SY OOo's OOo'o~ 000'0~ 000' or 000 'o~ 000 'sr ooo's Ja~}o aJ!AJas - sayrs 1aN
t9n ooo'on OOO'St ooo'Ot OOO'S OOO'OY 000' or 000' Ot 000' O~ 000 'O~ 000'01 000' o~ OOO'SI OOO'S ITf}SUI - s91rs }9N
trnr ooo'szr'~ OOO'OO~ 000' OO~ 000' OO~ 000' OO~ OOO'OSY OOO'OO~ OOO'OO~ OOO'OO~ OOO'S~~ OOO'OO~ OOO'OSY 000 'OO~ 'NTO - sa Irs 1aN
tL6'U 000' 006 000' 09 OOO'OL OOO'SL OOO'SL 000'011 000' S9 000' OL OOO'OL OOO'SL 000' 06 OOO'OS 000'06 alq!sJA - salrs }9N
twos OS6'06L'£ sOI'm SOY'£8£ m'm m'm SI9'6t£ Olr' o~r OLr' O~£ OSS'ta OSS'TtZ OSS'YS~ Sr9'lOr OSS' YS~ a6fJ01S - salrs taN
un~ tOO'S~ trO'S~ tsn~ t9T"L~ t6n~ ton~ tLB't~ tOl' O~ tS0"9~ t60' ~~ tsn~ tSY 'Y~ , - 1J OJd SSOJ9
un~ 99r' LZS' I 9Sl'Sll S66' SlI ££6' tSI 10S'LLI t96' 091 miLt! m'9S1 6rt'O~1 m'YSI m's~1 YOI'm tSo'm HlOJd SSOJ9
--- .......-- ....................---. ..-.......-...... ----..--... ............. --....... --.. -- --.......... --............. --. ....-.......... .------- .-----...-------- ---...... -..------ ----..........
t69'SL rSS'SS9'S m'm ou'm ~S9'm m'm IS9'm t6S' ~St ~~9'm m'm szr'm m'm m'rrt nS'SSt OlOS S0009 JO lSOJ
-......... .........-------.......-. -..------. ...------_. -----..-.... -- ...-...... ....----...--.... --... ..... -------- .--.........- .-------..----- --..... -... -------_. --------.
'£0" 0- (rtO'~) (StO'S!) (LI~'II) (06r'r) (m's) rt (Bl5'~) (m) HS'£I 6SY'Y SOS'~I SOt'S Y~I 'r asuadx] ~Jo¡Jr J Ja~10
.... ---.. -- -........... --_......~ ----..--.... .........--...-. ..-.......... --............ --.................. -'"'........ -... --....--.- .-----.... . -...... ---...........- -- - - --. -----...--, --------.
un- (OOO't~) (~r~'~) (trZ'~) (S90'~) (roY'~) (sso'~) (roo'~) (o~o'~) )Ss' !) tss'1) (tSS'!) (m'y) (9S6'0 S}soJ snoaufTlaJS!N
tOO" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PJfPUf1S O} 9JUfpfA
'60'1 lS6'y~ ~OY'~ tSO'~ L6S' Y t£6 'y l6S'Y StS'1 tSS'Y H9'Y St9' I Ot9'Y m'l 6H'Y aJUrprA asr~JJnd
'00" 0 0 (SY6't1) (l90'n) (m'r) (on's) ~O~ (O~t'~) (m) Y5L 'n S9r'y miry 60S'S s~r'r 9JUe!JfA 6upnpflnUfN
'6n~ m'm'y SOl'm Hl't91 m'ySY rzs'69Y Ll6 '091 S6S'm m'9SY m'm tT£'zs¡ m'm 90S'zry SLY '9~Y u!6JfN SSOJ9
,- - - -......... - - -... -.... --- -...... -... -....- - - - -..... -...... _..... _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _....................... _.............. _ _ _...... _... _... _... w ............-- .........-...-- ,----------....................- ... --...-....-... ----...........
'00'001 ooo'an OOO'St 000' Ot ooo's OOO'OY 000' or 000' Ot 000' O~ 000' O~ 000'01 000' O~ OOO'SY OOo's S1S0J u0!1fTlr}SUI
mï6 SIO'61~ 9~S'~Y 116'H SOO' ~~ Ht'Y~ trO'lY O~S'~Y Slr'SI 09l'SY S90'1~ 09l'SI Y6L '~~ ~O~'SY uapJna pnpOJd
m'St rOO'96Y'£ m'm 96l'm Ll~'m SSS'611 S9s'm Z95'99~ Tt6 'S9~ tSI 'St~ trO'OS~ m'm osr'm OS6 ' !9Z U9pJng ~JOpf J
t£ l'B~ S09'SYO'~ ~st 6SY S09'lSY 06L' OLY SSO' HI 6rL 'OLY 060'99Y SY6'99Y m'091 190'm 6~9'ZS¡ SS6' LSY rzs'OLT Slfpa}fN
'OO'OOY OS6'SYS'L SOY 'rot SOy'rOl m'tS9 m'tS9 m'tS9 OLr'or9 Olr'Q£9 OSS'YSS OSs' YSS OSs' !B5 sr9'm OSS'YSS sa¡rs }9N
-.. .....-... - - - --.. - - -- -.. -........ - - - - - - -...... - - - - -- -- --... -.. -......... ............... - - --.. - - --... -..................... -.. -... ..------- ............... .........-.. .......----------- ~-----_.... ~..__...._..w
tiO'Z SH'm m'H rLS'H S9S' £Y S9S'n S9S'rl S90'n S90'rY 090'~Y 090'~Y 090'~Y sss'n 090'~1 SUO!SS!IIOJ
un m'Sl r~r' L r~r'l SIS'9 SIS'9 SYS'9 S9S'9 595'9 090'9 090'9 090'9 SOS'S 090'9 saJueM0TlU , sUJn}a~
UnOY OOO'OSL'L OOO'SZ£ OOO'S~l 000'5£9 000'5£9 000'SL9 000'OS9 000 '0S9 000' 009 000' 009 000'009 OOO'5l5 000' 009 salfS SSOJ9
----..--- .................-.......... --... ...---- - - - -.. --..-..... ....-....-............... -. ......-..........---..........--... --..----.. _n .....-......-... ..-...... .--.....---- .......-.....--...
S66Y mNmO mN3AoN mom mN]ld3S 1 sn9nu A1nt 3Nnr ,\UN 11~dU mUN mn~8H mnm
mOl
B90ns
lUNI91HO Nom3roHd
S66Y
P¡OS SP009 lO }soJ
s}96png }uaI91r}s 9IOJUI
SpJOJaH aTQ!S!A 9IJU
I~I'S 1~1
S~I'S 1;¡1
nI'S 1;¡1
;¡J1U;¡S
I'1;¡X
I1101
161'9 000'005 000' OS 000'05 000' OS 000'01 000' st 000'5 000'01 000' 0 I 000'01 000'01 000' os 000'0
118'E6 m'm' Ot8'm m'lo¿ m'ug m'm 519'609 098'm 098'8E9 m'm m'm m'06S m'm 088' us
.................... ...--.. -.............. ---...... ..--.... __...... -- --.. ...--...... --....-.... -- ---.... ----- --.................. "'.... --- --...... ---..-....... --.. _.. --...... -----..- ---.. -_oO.. _.........
100'001 m'm'8 018'm m'm m'm 05E'm 519'159 098'ø¿g 098'ø¿g 519'159 519'159 OH'OE9 m'm 088 'm
---.. ...--....... -.. -- ......--.. -.......... -....-.........- ------- -- ---.... --..- --.. --........ ...-..--- -----..........--..... ..-...-.......---...------.. --.-.....
SlO'I m'm m'u m'St m'81 m'st m'lt m'st m'lt n'Et m'6E t8Z ' Et m'6£ 891'U
SUKUI! mOl
sooummu
dId , 3/1 Slm
XOUTI331d3G
mymKIYX , SlU mms
lJ1.UdlOð3 - IIn
mum 3OIS¡00
SIOUdll3SBJlS , Sloa
msm - 33IYlOSII
smddOS mm
S3ImUO 13910
IIOHd3m
3ÐY1S0d
ÐlIOlIOH - illl
mRKIYUlm , mYII
H0I33!I0 - ÐIISI1I3Aay
smms
mamH , 10I1Y3YA
samy , suumlI
UUWO
mum· Slums
msms . SlI1Y1YS
mmyIYX - mum
modIYx 3OISlDO
SISro m01dO 11810
mx.umn Slm
smO'JdU - 33moSII
SIOISUd
Slm 110llYd
, sm133R
10UOXOld
mmn131IYR
m
OE
m
o
851
051
05
m
051
o
000'
o
o
000'
o
001
199'
o
o
OOS
o
OEl'1
o
80Z'Z
o
o
It
m
699
611
I
5
5
0'
'Z
I
S
E
U
OE
U
o
85
OS
05
U
05
o
00
o
o
00
o
001
199
o
o
005
o
m'
o
800
o
o
1£
91E
t5I
ZU
m
OE
HZ
o
m
051
os
m
05t
o
000'
o
o
OOo'z
o
001
199'9
o
o
005
o
m'l
o
60E'Z
o
o
U
815'1
m's
m's
U
OE
U
o
8S
OS
OS
it
OS
o
000
o
o
OOO'Z
o
001
199'9
o
o
oos
o
OEl'I
o
800'Z
o
o
1£
m'l
ISI'S
ZU'E
m
OE
HZ
o
m
051
os
m
05t
o
000'
o
o
OOo'z
o
001
199'9
o
o
ooç
o
m'I
o
60E'Z
o
o
it
m'I
m's
1£8'5
m
OE
HZ
o
m
OSI
os
m
05t
o
000'
o
o
OOo'z
o
001
199'9
o
o
m
o
m'l
o
80Z'Z
o
o
It
mil
699' S
611' S
0'
'E
I
9'
'I
'Z
U
OE
U
o
85
OS
05
U
OS
o
00
o
o
00
o
00
u
o
o
sz
o
It
o
SO
o
o
6E
m'l
m's
091' I
U
OE
U
o
85
05
OS
U
05
o
001
o
o
001
o
00
L9!
o
o
sz:
o
Itl
o
SO!
o
o
zt
St ¡'I
ni'S
HI'S
0'
0'
I
9'
6'
9'
m
OE
HZ
o
m
051
OS
m
OSI
o
000'
o
o
000'
o
001
199'
o
o
m
o
£16"
o
50l'Z
o
o
6E
m'l
m's
091' I
U
OE
II
o
85
OS
OS
U
OS
o
001
o
o
001
o
OOt
m
o
o
5Z [
o
HI'Z
o
EO ~'z
o
o
It
IS"I
69i1'8
61"' ¿
0'
0'
m
OE
HZ
o
m
OS!
05
m
05t
o
000'
o
o
000'
o
001
199'
o
o
m
o
551'
o
£01'
o
o
It
m'l
699' 8
611' ¿
U
OE
U
o
85
05
05
it
05
o
00,
o
o
001
o
OOt
m
o
o
m
o
05 ['Z
o
ZO I'Z
o
o
6E
EII'I
11"8
I9 "9
0'
0'
OOZ'E
09E
m'E
o
m'l
008'1
009
m'l
Oot'5
o
000 '81
o
o
000' OE
o
008' I
100'08
o
o
m'E
o
599'ZZ
o
JU'SZ
o
o
081
005'n
000'58
m'm
stO'O
100'0
stO'o
100'0
SEQ'O
SZO'O
SJO'O
SSI'O
UO'O
100'0
SE9'O
100'0
100'0
101'0
100'0
190'0
190'1
100'0
100'0
stO'O
100'0
10£'0
100'0
m'o
100'0
100'0
110'0
m'o
m'l
m'z
-.
!3HX3330 !3SR3AOI 1380100 !3HXUdIS
mom
ÐHISJ1I1AOY , ÐHI1mYR 'Sl1YS
11;¡Jpng 1V;¡U111S ;¡loJaI
IplOJa! alHsJA UJY
mO!S3A
mYR
111dY
not 3HRt m
HOU33tOld
m
,
ISRÐOY
ml
mœ
13ÐOOS
mlÐnO
sales laM
S3SM3dX3 mOl
OL£' 0£9 m'LSS OBB' ¡BS
0£9'Ü HI'H OS.' 9.
SInS9
S!9'.s9
09B'BL9
09B'BL9
.59
m
m'm
m'm
m'lSL
m'w
585'£LO'S
'00'00
'58'9
3SM3dX3 lB30 m
SBJ SHOl~3tiI0
SNOIlVMOO
m~dn~~o SMIOlInB
mmlN!~W , SBJ mms
3S~ lSOd
SOln~ - lM3ti
lM3Wdln03 - 1m
smms 30ISlno
SMOI1dlti~SBnS , S3no
S311ddnS mm
3NOHd313l
lN3WNlmm3 , HAm
S3SN3nl , S3SIH~M~tiJ 'S3X~1
m3N3S - 3~mnSN!
NOlmmd30
S3SN3dX3 3~IJJO
1I0n~ , l~m
SlSOJ mOldW3 mID
SNOISN3d
smOldW3 - 3~N~tinSNI
S3X~l 110ti.l.~d
3wm3AO
ti3HlO - sm~1VS
mlm - smns
000'1
o
00'
o
SZ9
000"
009
9£Z'.
005'1
OSZ
££S
OSS',
L99
SZ
OLS'Z
La
OSZ
OOO't
o
o
S9S"
066' I
BS
Z6S'.
m's
000'
o
001
o
5Z9
000'
009
9£Z'
005'
OSZ
m
oss'
L99
SZ
OLS'Z
LLZ
OSZ
000'.
o
o
595' I
ZIS'I
.S
8£5 '£I
Z69' L
000'1
o
001
o
5Z9
000'1
009
9£Z'.
005'1
OSZ
m
OSS'I
L99
SZ
OLS'Z
LLZ
OSZ
000'.
o
o
595' I
ZSo'z
.S
m's
m's
60Z'H
000'
o
001
o
m
000'
009
9£z'
005'
OSZ
££S
OSS'
L99
5Z
OLS'
LLZ
m
000'.
o
o
m'l
m'l
9II
s£s'£
Z69' L
619'Ü
000'
o
001
o
m
000'
009
9£Z'.
005'1
05Z
m
055'1
L99
5Z
OLS'Z
LLZ
OSZ
000'.
o
o
m'l
ZSO'Z
H
maSt
9.S'B
BLn.
000'
o
001
o
SZ9
000'
009
9£Z'.
005 'I
OSZ
m
05S"
L99
5Z
OLS'Z
LLZ
OSZ
000'.
o
o
m'l
Z66 'I
.S
Z6S'.
Z9.'S
an.
000'
o
001
o
m
000'
009
9£z'
OOS'
05Z
m
055'
L99
5Z
OLS'Z
LLZ
OSZ
000'.
o
o
595' I
Z06'I
.S
SIZ'H
LtO'S
0£9'Ü
000'
o
001
o
m
000'
009
9£Z'
005'
OSZ
££S
OSS'
L99
SZ
OLS'Z
LLZ
05Z
000'.
o
o
595' I
ZSO'Z
.S
69S'S¡
m's
an.
000'
o
001
o
m
000'
009
9£Z'.
OOS'I
OSZ
££S
OS5"
L99
SZ
OLS'Z
LLZ
OSZ
000'.
o
o
595' I
Z06 'I
.S
HZ'.
LtO'S
SLn.
000'
o
00'
o
m
000'
009
9£z' .
OOS'I
OSZ
m
055"
L99
SZ
OLS'Z
LLZ
m
000'.
o
o
S9S'I
Z66'I
.S
Z6S'H
Z9.'S
SLn.
000'1
o
001
o
m
000'1
009
9£Z'.
OOS'I
05Z
m
OSS'I
L99
SZ
OLS'Z
LtZ
m
000'.
o
o
S9S'I
Z66'1
.S
Z6S'H
Z9t'S
an.
000'
o
001
o
m
000'
009
9£Z'
005'
m
££S
05S'
L99
SZ
OLS'Z
LLZ
OSZ
000'.
o
o
S9S'I
Z06'I
.S
SIZ'H
LLO'S
szrm
OOO'ZI
o
OOZ'I
o
OOS'L
OOO'ZI
OOz'L
HS'05
OOO'SI
000'£
000'01
009'SI
OOo's
00£
o.s'o£
9Z£'£
000'£
000' S.
o
o
OSL'SI
m'£z
£00' I
000'9LI
000'001
m'o
'00'0
uO'O
'00'0
'60'0
m'o
'60'0
'£9'0
m'o
uO'O
m'o
m'o
'01'0
'00'0
'S£"O
uO'O
uO'O
'65'0
'00'0
'00'0
m'o
m'o
uO'O
m'z
un
.l.WnN~r
mntiBH
H~tiVW
lItidV
.l.VN
3Nnr
mr
lsnsnv
mwmo H3SN3MN H3BOl~O H3SN31d3S
S661
lVlOl
mons
l~NISIHO
3mmSININOV , lmm
sla6pns lualalelS aIO~UI
spJo~ati a¡q!S!A alJ~
566 I
N0I!33rOHd
JSIW
mm
.uNm~"
3WOHd3131
N39 mVHOSNI
mms 30ISIOO
'SNI mOldW3
S3XVl 110HAVd
1l0HAVd
ZOZ'SI
OO~
ros
000'
009
OOZ
m'9
SlS
Hl
l09'l
16l'ZZ
OO~
JZS'r
000'1
009
OOZ
SSS'S
SlS
ZZl
SI6 '9
09L'8
OO~
ZIO'Z
000'1
009
OOZ
06S't
Sl8
ors
rS6 'l
S90' IZ
OO~
slo'r
000'1
009
OOZ
srr'l
SlS
ZZl
SI6'9
09L'S
oot
ZIO'Z
OOO'y
009
OOZ
06S't
SlS
ors
mil
Slr'S
OOt
ZYO'Z
OOO'Y
009
OOZ
06S't
Sl8
t6l
l09'l
OZS'ZY
OO~
ros
000
009
OOZ
£ZZ'
SlS
SSl
Y9Z'l
t£O'LT
oot
60S'
000'
009
OOZ
899'
SlS
O£S
£S6'l
Z
m
OOt
SYO'£
OOO'Y
009
OOZ
m'l
SlS
8Sl
Y9Z'l
900'ZZ
OOt
as
000'
009
OOZ
£00'9
SlS
t6l
l09'l
a6'ty
OOt
900'
000'
009
OOZ
SH'Z
SlS
t6l
l09'l
9ZS'ZI
OOt
60S
000'
009
OOZ
£ZZ'Y
SlS
8Sl
Y9Z'l
SYO'6YZ
oon
OSl'tZ
OOO'ZI
OOZ'l
OO~'Z
OS9'SS
OOS'OY
ssr'6
006' 6S
mms
SWIOl
1i1N
iI~!^JilS O/N - sill'S
JlS
OSS
sr9'LOS
OSS'ItS
tS
OSS
ItS
OSS
Olr'06S
OLr'm
SY9' 609
SY9'tT9
SIn09
m
SO
m
SOl
OS6 'SIO'l
OS6 'SIS'l
ilN
Jil410 iI~!^JilS-Sil'S 1iN
TI'1SUI - sill'S 1i1N
'WTO - sill'S 1i1N
illq!S!A - sill'S 1i1N
il6'J01S - sill'S 1i1N
iI~UflJ'A 6upnp'lnuew
Sill'S
'101
ISS
OOD'S
OOo's
000' OOZ
000' 06
OSS'ISZ
szr'r
OSS
Sr9' l SS
OOD'Sr
OOO'SI
000' OSI
000' OS
m'lOr
60S'S
ISS
OSS
000' OZ
OOO'OZ
OOO'OOZ
000'06
OSS'ISZ
OSS'18S OS8'l8S
.....-...........-...... --...............
ooo'oz ooo'or
ooo'oz 000'01
OOO'OOZ OOO'SZZ
OOO'Ol OOO'Sl
088' HZ 08S 'uz
QLr'Or9
000' OZ
OOO'OZ
000' OOZ
OOO'Ol
QLr'OZ£
Ol£' Or9
OOO'S
000' Ot
000' OOZ
000'S9
Olr' OZ£
(m'z
SInS9
000 'SI
000' or
OOO'OSI
OOO'OIT
m'm
SI9'tS9
ooO'Or
000'01
000' OOZ
OOO'st
m'6fr
SInS9
OOO'St
OOO'S
000' OOZ
OOO'Sl
m'6Z£
(6TZ'£
rOl
000'0
OOO'Ot
000' OOZ
OOO'Ol
sOl'm
SO
rOl
OOO'S
OOO'St
000' OOZ
000' 09
SOI'r6£
SO
000' m
000' 09Z
ooo'szr'z
000'006
OS6'06l'£
ZZO'r
89r
660'IlZ
£9t'Z£Z
ISl'rl
m
ZOZ
8
on
I
190
(81nl
'00'0
'S9'S~
'S9'8~
UilpJns Pi!ldd~
UilpJns l'np~
181'08Z
0ls'r8Z
m'm
m'o9Z
868 'l9Z
OZ6' 08Z
H6 '99Z
S69'08Z
6 Ir' l8Z
ZlS'9SZ
im
Z8r' 6a
Z96 '9a
668'Z6Z
10l'm
sOO'lor
S68'Z6Z
rSZ'l6Z
t90' ~6Z
m'olr
9S9'66Z
m'80r
m'm
810'sa-r
slo'm'£
ilsuildX3 ~JOP'J 1'101
S1S0J ~JiI^!lilO 1i1N
snoiu'Tli~S!W
S1S0J ~1U'JJf"
1UilIU!'1Jil1U3 t li^'Jl
6u!pl!ns 1'1uilH
1Uilld!nb3 1'1UilH
iU04dillill
SiI!1!1!10
dOHd 1~NOSH3d - Silx'l
I'JilUil9 - iI~u'JnsuI
UO!1'!~ilJdilO
SiI~!^JilS ilP!S1no
iI~U'Uil1U!'W t SJ1'dilH
si!lddns ~JOp, J
S1soJ iliI~0ldl3 Jil410
i~u'JnsuI iil~0ldl3
SiX'l TlOJ~'d
10H 10) 'dloJ JiQ10
ill!1JiI^O
Joq'l PiJ1Pu
~J'I'S piJ!PU
VA t
m
m'
Frl'
OO~
ros
m'
OS8
009
!rl' 9Z
JlS'Z
mil
60"8
m'zz
m'z
9l£' 61
OSZ
S90't
OIO'S
896 '~
69l'9
Zll'S
T9l'O'
lOO
6SZ' 80Z
nt'r
m'z
OO~
JZS'r
m'l
OS8
009
8Zl'rz
JlS'Z
lIS'l
60t'8
m'rz
roo'z
661'lI
OSZ
OO~'ZI
Orl'rl
896 '~
tSj'9
m'lI
m'9~
m
lOl'r
rrl'Z
OO~
ZIO'Z
m'l
OSS
009
m'sz
JlS'Z
lIS'l
60t'S
6rt'OZ
8rl'Z
6S£'8
OSZ
9rT'~
r80'S
896't
llO'l
SZ9'6
S90'r
68
zrZ'Zlz
Lon
rrL'z
OOt
810'r
ll6'TT
OSS
009
6zr'SZ
JlS'Z
m'l
60t'S
tSS' ZZ
8rl'Z
6sr'SI
m
191'rl
6~O'~Y
S96' ~
ts['9
S90 'l I
9~1 '9t
tzZ
rzt
lOl'£
££l'Z
OO~
ZIO'Z
ll6 'I
OSS
009
6Z£' SZ
IlS'Z
m'l
60t'8
m'oz
srl'z
6sr'SI
OSZ
8!T'ty
r9Q'SI
OtZ'8
llO'l
m'61
S90' rs
99S
6£0'
rn'
OOt
ZIO'Z
m'l
OSS
009
96S' a
JlS'Z
m'l
60t'S
ors'yz
orr'z
ZOO' OZ
OSZ
9tl't
~60'S
896 '~
69l'9
Zll'S
19l'O'
S6S'91Z
SOO't
£n'z
oot
ros
ll6'n
OSS
009
Z9£' a
JlS'Z
lYS'l
60~'S
OZO'SI
OY£'Z
rr8'61
OSZ
OIS'£1
S£l'ty
Otz' 8
Z9~'9
816'lI
m's~
S90'09
OlS'SZZ
Tl
m
OO~
605'1
ll6'TT
OSS
009
m'sz
Tls'Z
m'l
60~'S
091'IZ
90~'Z
~S9'OZ
OSZ
909'ty
~SS'SI
S96't
llO'l
m'6Y
890' rs
Si9'6ZZ
soft
r£l'Z
OO~
810'£
l16'1
OSS
009
6Zl' 8Z
IlS'Z
llS'l
60"S
Il6'tZ
m'z
~zs'oz
OSZ
6T!'ty
~90'SI
o~z' S
Z9~'9
SI6 'll
rS~'St
91Z'6ZZ
9£
m
OO~
as't
ll6'n
OSS
009
19Z'SZ
m'z
m'l
60~'S
m'£z
9sr'z
SS~'OZ
OSZ
96Z'ty
SSZ'SI
S96 '~
69l'9
Zll'8Y
19l' OS
lS9'm
SW~
r£l'Z
OO~
900'1
1I6'I
OSS
009
8ZS'O£
m'z
m'l
60~'8
SSI'IZ
m'z
SZI'ZZ
OSZ
~SS'~
6~S'S
ZIS'I
69L' 9
Zil'S
19l'O
6l9'6ZZ
S9~
m'
OO~
60S
l16 '
OSS
009
8ZS'O£
m'z
m"L
60~'S
t96' 6 I
m'z
SZI' ZZ
OSZ
Tlt'ty
O~~'SI
ZIS'TT
m'9
SI6 'If
m's~
S9r'OS9' Z
OOO'S~
oos' zr
oos'~
OSI'H
~oo'm
OOZ'OI
OOZ'l
St6' a£
Sts'or
lOZ' 06
016 '001
OOO'Q9Z
SS9 'lZ
lOl'l£Z
ooo'r
061'S91
m'611
OZs' ZS
000' OS
m'lzz
006' 665
,onr
'89'0
tin
tiO'O
un
un
'51"0
'01"0
tin
un
'6Z'1
un
o
un
,wr
uO'O
,on
'9S'Z
'ST"T
UT"T
'91'£
'SS"B
Joq'l pilJ!O
tOS' Z9
06r' ZS
zrL'6S
srZ'09
£lZ' 9S
90£'£9
1£5' t9
OZZ' £9
H3BW31d3S
6~S'~9
666 'r9
m'r9
OS9'm
tin
iI~!^JilS pnpOJd
pu~ silsuildx3 ~JOP'J
1i16pns 1Uillil1'1S illo~uI
SPJO~ilH.illq~S!A nJV ~
mONvr
mOHBH
HJH~W
lIHd~
m
3Nor
S661
not
NOW3£OHd
lS090~
mmo
H3SW3AON
mwmo
5661
1~101
moos
lVNl9IHO
ACME DESIGN TECHNOLOGY, CO.
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
Pursuant to the Security Agreement dated as of January 28, 1993, and as
amended as of August 19, 1994 (the "Agreement") between ACME DESIGN
TECHNOLOGY, CO., (the "Company") and NATIONSBANK OF VIRGINIA,
N .A., the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies as follows:
1. The Company is in compliance with all terms, covenants, and
conditions of the Agreement that are binding upon the Company.
Compliance with the financial covenants as of the statement dated
February 28, 1995 is outlined below:
(a) Quick Ratio. Maintain a ratio of (i) cash plus accounts
receivable to (ii) Current Liabilities of not less than 1.0 to 1.0 as
of the end of the Fiscal Month ending July 31, 1994, and at all
times thereafter.
Cash
Accounts Receivable
Total
$ 105,929
+ 1.236.851
$ 1,342,780
Current Liabilities
$ 1,318.553
Ratio:
1.02
(b) Current Ratio. Maintain a ratio of Current Assets to Current
Liabilities of not less than 1.9 to 1.0 as of the end of the Fiscal
Month ending July 31, 1994, and at all times thereafter.
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
$ 2.548,704
$ 1.318.553
Ratio:
1. 93
(c) Leverage Ratio. Maintain a ratio of Senior Indebtedness
to Adjusted Tangible N et Worth as of the last day of each
Fiscal Quarter, of not more than the ratio set forth opposite
such Fiscal Quarter.
Fiscal Quarter Ending
Ratio
9/30/94
12/31/94
3/31/95
3.25 to 1.0
3.25 to 1.0
3.00 to 1.0
lab \¡:word\ hm \núoe \acroo.cc
11/11Ð4 11:30 AM
6/30/95
9/30/95
12/31/95
3/31/96 and each
Fiscal Quarter end
thereafter
Total Liabilities
Subordinated Debt
Total
Net Worth
Intangibles
Subordinated Debt
Adj. Tang. Net Worth
Ratio:
2.75 to 1.0
2.50 to 1.0
2.25 to 1.0
2.0 to 1.0
$2.611.392
- 400.000
$2.211.392
$ 403,518
- 87.041
+ 400,000
$ 716.477
3.09
(d) Debt Service Ratio. Not permit its Debt Service Ratio for any
period set forth below, ending on the last day of each Fiscal
Quarter to be less than the ratio set forth opposite such period:
AuuIicable Period
7/1/94 to 12/31/94
1/1/95 to 3/31/95
1/1/95 to 6/30/95
1/1/95 to 9/30/95
1/1/95 to 12/31/95
1/1/96 to 3/31/96 and each
respective 6-Fiscal Month,
9-Fiscal Month, 12-Fiscal
Month and 3-Fiscal-Month
Period thereafter beginning
on the first day of the Fiscal
Year and ending on the last
day of each Fiscal Quarter
Net Income
Depreciation & Amort.
Other Noncash Charges
Other Noncash Credits
Cash Flow
Ratio
1.0 to 1.0
1.0 to 1.0
1.15 to 1.0
1.30 to 1.0
1.30 to 1.0
$ 56,645
+ 17,470
+ 0
o
$ 74.115
lab \c:word\ hm\mi..\acme.oo
1111/1)4 11:30 AM
CMLTD
Cap. Lease Pymts
Fixed Charges
$ 44.594
+ 1.333
$ 45.927
Ratio:
1. 61
(e) Capital Expenditures. Not make or permit any Subsidiary to
make Consolidated Capital Expenditures at any time during the
respective applicable periods set forth below, if the Consolidated
Capital Expenditures would exceed the amount set forth
opposite each such applicable period.
Applicable Period
1/1/94 - 12/31/94 and
each calendar year
thereafter
Amount
$50,000
Applicable Period: 1/1/95 - 2/28/95
Net Fixed Assets at start of period:
Net Fixed Assets at end of period:
Depreciation changed during period:
Capital Expenditures during period
$ 371.205
-364.911
+ 12.599
$ 6.305
(f) Tangible Net Worth. Maintain a Tangible Net Worth as of
September 30, 1994 and December 31, 1994, of not less than the
amount set forth opposite such date.
Date
September 30, 1994
December31, 1994
Reauired
$199,000
$249,000
Actual
$ 199.042
$ 254.960
2. The representations and warranties of the Company set forth in the
Agreement and all representations and warranties which are
contained in any certificate, document, or financial or other statement
furnished pursuant to or in connection with the Agreement are true
and correct on and as of the date hereof with the same effect as if made
on the date hereof.
lob \g:word\jhm\ßÚ" \Demo.DC
11/1/943:01 PM
3. The Borrowing Base (as defined in the Agreement) as of
February 28, 1995 calculated in accordance with the
Agreement, is shown on the Schedule annexed hereto and the
Borrowing Base is equal to or exceeds to aggregate principal amount of
the Term Loan outstanding to the Company pursuant to the
Agreement. =7JJ ';;'b. ,/ I!ð
c--~ ~
Title:
President
Dated: Apri 1 10, 1995
lab \¡:word\jhm\mioc\acDUl.co
1I/1/{)4 11:30 AM
ACME DESIGN TECHNOLOGY, CO.
Schedule to Borrowing Base Certificate
Computations are as of 2/28/95
I. COMPUTATION O~' NET SECURITY
VALUE OF INVENTORY
INVENTORY (valued at lower
of cost or FMV at FIFO)
$ 940,189.53
LESS:
Inventory charged off
or written down as
unsaleable
$(
Other unqualified
Inventory
$(
$940,189.53
ELIGIBLE INVENTORY
x
.50
NET SECURITY VALUE - INVENTORY
$470,094.77
II. COMPUTATION OF NET SECURITY
VALUE OF ACCOUNTS
TOTAL ACCOUNTS $ 1,387,921.08
LESS:
Affiliate or Employee
Accounts $( )
Accounts not Invoiced $( )
Accounts more than 90
days past due $ ( . 199.907.07 )
Disputed Accounts $( )
Insolvent Debtor Accounts $( )
Foreign Accounts $( )
Consignment Accounts $( )
Government Accounts $( )
Unshipped Accounts $( )
. Other unqualified
Accounts $( )
ELIGIBLE ACCOUNTS $ 1.188.014.01
x .75
NET SECURITY VALUE - ACCOUNTS $ 891,010.51
III. BORROWING BASE VALUE
Net Security Value - Inventory
Net Security Value - ~ccounts
Total Net Security Value
$
$
$
470,094.77
891,010.51
1,361,105.28
f.,,:".
Page
Prior Periods
1995
Current Period Compared to
For Periods Ending JANUARY
Acme Design Technology Co
BALANCE SHEET
massie
43:5'1
3
O"lI'U6/'15
.
From
Year
Change
Last
Last Year
This Period
Change From
Last Period
Last Period
Balance
This Period
Balance
34
0.00
43,008.07
0.00
(1,069.98
0.00
14,040.65
---------------
55,978.74
53,426
66
0.00
735.43
0.00
000.00
0,00
040,65
343
90
38
50
4
93
0,00
85,530.29
0.00
,930.02
0.00
0.00
23,408
39,673,75
0.00
96,213.21
0.00
53,000.00)
0.00
0.00
68
0.00
743.50
0.00
069.98
0.00
0.00
082
63
28
5
CURRENT ASSETS
CASH
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
INSTALLMENT RECEIVABLES
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - CUST
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - GOVT
RESERVE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCTS
RESERVE FOR EST CREDIT
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE CONTRA
on
Descrlpt
3~6. 44
980.09
748.92
821 .02
0.00
0.00
945.75
,
,
,
,
30
(3
14
( 12
87
694.78
329.56
213.41
490.41
414.39
0.00
0.00
945.75
,
,
,
,
974
162
452
144
329
87
3
286.02
324.34
523.20
379.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
87,460
,
,
,
,
( 6
45
27
15
043,213.2
02
98
13
27
00
00
00
942
908
116
214
o
o
o
,
,
,
,
198
402
131
301
613.52
656.00
233.32
239.33
593,37
0.00
0,00
0.00
,
,
,
,
30
192
448
159
316
TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
INVENTORY
FINISHED GOODS
FINISHED PARTS
YORK IN PROCESS
RAY I1ATERIALS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
CAPITALIZED INDIRECT COSTS
INVENTORY CONTRA ACCOUNT
00
170.00
0.00
613.87
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000.00
220
6
02
3,100.00
0.00
40,923.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
502
000
62
330.00
0.00
910.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ø.OO
0.00
940
8
40
000.00
0.00
621.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000.00
034,18
2
4
02
2,330.00
0.00
42,531,33
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.00
66,000.00
122
6
INVENTORY
OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
ADVACES TO EI1PLOYEES
TRANSPORTATION CLAII1S
OTHER RECEIVABLES
NOTE RECV - RELATED PARTY
NOTE RECV - CUSTOHER
NOTE RECV - EHPLOYEES
INTEREST RECV-RELATED PRTY
DEFERRED INCOI1E TAXES
TOTAL
66
66
843.81
95
492,468
66
023.46
928,876.60
44
00
86
240
049
94
09,621.33
2,221,295.69
861.33
345,55
o
2,42
TOTAL OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
2
Page
04/06/95 3:45:58 mass1e Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
. For Periods Ending JANUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co.
BALANCE SHEET
This Period Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Description Balance Balance Last Period This Period Last Year
------------------------. ---------- --- ---------- .--------- .------------ ---------------
NOTES RECV - RELATED PARTIES 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT
LAND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
IMPROVEMENTS TO LAND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
BUILDINGS 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 .0.00
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 454,072.55 454,072.55 0.00 451,662.98 2,409.57
FURN, FIXT & OFF MACHINES 34,840.67 34,840,67 0.00 34,094.00 746.67
EOUIP. UNDER CAPITAL LEASES 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00
TRUCKS & AUTOS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CONSTRUCTION IN PROCESS 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
---------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS - COST 518,913.22 518,913.22 0.00 515,756.98 3,156.24
ALLOUANCE FOR DEPRECIATION (154,007.45 147,707.96 (6,299,49 (78,232.02 (75,775.43
----------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
NET FIXED ASSETS 364,905.77 371,205.26 (6,299.49 437,524.96 (72,619. 19
OTHER ASSETS
PREPAID INSURANCE 8,627.17 8,960.00 (332.83 9,857.41 (1,230.24
PREPAID RENT 12,000.00 12,000.00 0.00 7,771 .51 4,228.49
OTHER PREPAID EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0,00 727.69 (727.69
PATENTS LESS AMORTIZATION 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
DEFERRED ORGANIZATION EXPENS 69,657.08 71,450.59 (1,793.51 86,613.44 (16,956.36
OTHER DEFERRED EXPENSES 19,8.93.65 20,462.04 (568.39 26,714.33 (6,820.68
--------------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 110,177.90 112,872.63 (2,694.73 131 ,684.38 (21,506.48
--------------- --- - ------ --------- ------------ ---------------
TOTAL ASSETS 2,896,429.22 2,7 373.58 85,055.64 2,498,085,94 398,343.~8
3
Page
Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
For Periods Ending JANUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
BALANCE SHEET
Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Balance Last Period This Period Last Year
---------- ---------- .----------- -----------
485,479.15 :85,262.92 246,843.33 423,898.74
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2,976.66 977.03 922.24 3,031.45
19,069.71 19,069.71 0.00 0.00
35,032.19 4,645.69 45,202.71 (5,524.83)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
---------- .--------- .----------- -----------
542,557.71 71,815.93 292,968.28 421,405.36
25,120.99 22,136.41 38,122.81 9,134.59
67,242.65 25,076.52 96,081.68 (53,915.55)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
45,507.15 5,650.31 19,915.44 31,242.02
21,134.20 1,381.26 5,806.56 16,708.90
24,552.07 6,662.29 14,595. 15 16,619.21
---------- --------- ---------- -----------
183,557.06 10,753.75 174,521.64 19,789.17
180,000.00 0.00 173,523.00 6,477.00
8,471.79 96.25 8,421.72 146.32
109,976.11 487.37 87,785.25 22,678.23
---------- --------- ---------- ----------------
298,447.90 583.62 269,729.97 29,301.55
---------- -- ----- ---------- ----------
024,562.67 83 53,30 737,219.89 470,496.08
This Period
Balance
----------
670,742,07
0.00
0.00
3,953,69
0.00
39,677.88
0.00
0.00
----------
714,373,64
47,257.40
42,166,13
0.00
0.00
0,00
51,157.46
22,515.46
31,214.36
----------
194,310,81
180,000,00
8,568.04
110,463.48
----------
299,031,52
----------
207,715.97
04/06/95 3:46:30 massie
.
Description
------------------------.
CURRENT LIABILITIES
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
TRADE PAYABLES
PAYROLL U.H. FEDERAL
PAYROLL U.H. STATE & LOCAL
SALES TAX
OTHER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
DEFERRED INCOME - SERVICE
DEFERRED INCOME - PENSION
DEFERRED INCOME - OTHER
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCRUED EXPENSES
SALARIES & UAGES
COMMISSIONS
PENSIONS/PROFIT SHARING
FEDERAL INCOME TAX
STATE & CITY INCOME TAXES
TAXES - OTHER
INTEREST
OTHER ACCRUED EXPENSES
TOTAL ACCRUED EXPENSES
CURRENT PORTION LTD
BANKS
OBLIGATIONS-CAPITAL LEASES
NOTES PAYABLE-OTHER CURRENT
TOTAL CURRENT LTD
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
4
Page
04/06/95 3:47:42 maSS1e Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
, For Periods Ending JANUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co,
BALANCE SHEET
This Period Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Description Balance Balance Last Period This Period Last Year
------------------------, ---------- --- ---------- .--------- .------------ ----------------
LONG TERM DEBT
NATIONS BANK - NOTE #1 FIXED 131,408.23 131,408.23 0.00 137,885.23 (6,477.00)
NATIONS BANK - NOTE #2 LINE 195,000.00 210,000.00 15,000.00 375,000.00 (180,000.00)
VA. ECONOMIC DEV. AUT.-VRLF 477,772.77 485,537.39 <7,764.62 565,236.25 (87,463.48)
VEDCORP INC. 380,000.00 380,000,00 0.00 400,000.00 (20,000.00)
OBLIGATIONS-CAPITAL LEASES 7,232.94 7,992.14 <759.20 14,738.01 (7,505.07)
NOTES PAYABLE-OTHER LONG TERM 125,000.00 125,000.00 0.00 0.00 125,000.00
---------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 316,413.94 339,937.76 23,523.82 1,492,859.49 (176,445.55
DEFERRED INCOME TAX 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CAP IT AL
COMMON STOCK 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00
UEBENTURES PAYABLE 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 (50,000.00
PAID IN SURPLUS 480,000,00 480,000.00 0.00 480,000.00 0.00
--------------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
500,000.00 500,000.00 0,00 550,000.00 (50,000.00
RETAINED EARNINGS-BEGIN PERIOD (153,126.85 107,837.47 45,289.38 (173,837.47 20,710.62
NET INCOME 25,426,16 (45,289.38 70,715.54 (108,155.97 133,582.13
------------ --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
TOTAL CAPITAL 372,299.31 346,873.15 25,426.16 268,006.56 104,292.75
------------ --- - ------ --------- ------------ ---------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY 2,896,429.22 2,7 373.58 85,055.64 2,498,085.94 398,343.28
04/06/95 3:34 9 massie Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page
For periods JANUARY 1995 thru JANUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co.
INCOME STATEMENT
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to
Description Current Period Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Year
-------------- -------- -- ---------- --- -- ---- ----------- ---- ------------ ------
GROSS SALES 588,734.45 (102.54 0.00 588,734.45 0.00 256,831.05 129.2J
RETURNS & ALLO~ANCES 3,955.33 (0.69 0.00 3,955.33 0.00 3,821.95 3.49
COMMISSIONS 10,650,73 (1.86 0.00 10,650.73 0.00 5,312.57 100.48
-- ---------- --------- ---- .---------- ---- ------------ ------
NET SALES 574,128,39 (100.00 0.00 574,128,39 0.00 247,696.53 131.79
COST OF GOODS SOLD 461,322.25 (80.35 0.00 461,322.25 0.00 279,757.97 64.90
--, .--------- ---- ---- .---------- ---- ------------ ------
GROSS PROFIT 12,806.14 9.65 0.00 112,806.14 0.00 ( 32, 061 . 44 451'.84
SALES, MARKETING, & ADVRTISING 34,224 . 15 5.96 0.00 34,224.15 0.00 29,350.92 16.60
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 48,496.42 8,45 0,00 48,496.42 0.00 42,588.58 13.87
INCENTIVES & PROFIT SHARING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
--------- ---- ---- .---------- ---- ------------ -----
OPERATING EXPENSES 82,720.57 4,41 0.00 82,720.57 0.00 71,939.50 14.99
--------- ---- ---- .---------- ---- ------------ -----
NET OPERATING INCOME 30,085.57 5.24 0.00 30,085.57 0.00 (104,000.94 28.93
INTEREST EXPENSE 12,229.74 2.13 0.00 12,229.74 0.00 8,029.97 52.30
OTHER INCOME OR EXPENSE (7,570,33 1.32 0.00 (7,570.33 0.00 (3,874.94 95.37
INCOME TAXES 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------ - ---- ---- ------- - ---- ----- ----- ----
NET INCOME 25,426 6 4.43 0.00 25,426 6 0.00 (108 55.97 2'3.5
,.
2
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1995 thru JANUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
massie
3:34:3
04/06/95
.
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
29.23.)
3.49
00.48
05
95
57
256,831
3,821
5,312
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
588,734.45
3,955.33
0,650.73
Period
Budget
00
00
00
o
o
o
Current
Pct
02.54
(0.69
(1 .86
Period
588,734.45
3,955.33
0,650.73
Current
Descriptlon
-----------
GROSS SALES
RETURNS & ALLOUANCES
COMMISSIONS
79
0.00
220.97
145.03
12.23
73.78
3
53
0.00
315.51
219.74
083.49
956.54
------
575.28
696
,
,
,
,
247
52
92
16
42
203
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
28.39
0.00
917.17
966.07
051. 18
264.51
,
,
,
,
574
167
225
18
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
)
)
)
)
00
0.00
29.25
39.36
(3.14
(1,96
73.7
00
28.39
00
17
07
18
51
93
o
917
966
051
264
98
,
,
,
,
574
167
225
18
11
423
NET SALES
PURCHASED FOR RESALE-COST
MATERIALS
FACTORY BURDEN
PRODUCT BURDEN
INSTALLATION COSTS
07.88
00
o
93
98
423
00
o
COST OF GOODS SOLD
08
45.77
58.55
30.65
0.00
75.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
242
25
73
54
10
00
68
00
00
00
21
927
265
630
o
640
o
o
o
44
68
2
5
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
929.46
381.56
591.91
725.45
0.00
24.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
23.32
50
37
3
( 1
( 1
38
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
29
6.51
0.63
0.30
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
26
50,929.46
56
91
45
00
70)
00
00
00
381
591
725
o
24
o
o
o
37
3
1
GROSS MARGIN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
PURCHASED MATERIAL VARIANCE
VARIANCE TO STANDARD
DISCOUNT ALLOCATION
SCRAP SALES
INTERIM INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT
PHYSICAL INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT
CAPITALIZED INVY INDIRECT COST
96
84
49
45
69
44
82
06
76
32
00
o
4
2,806
00
o
6.64
9.65
23.32
4
2,806
38
TOTAL OTHER FACTORY EXPENSES
GROSS PROFIT
3
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1995 thru JANUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
massie
3:34:40
04/(16/95
Last Year Variance ~o
This Period Last Year
44.32
35.10
60.05
76.09
44.38
50.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
88.53
52.92
78.93
(2.92
56.76
0.00
21.47
(2.04
86.72
18.18
41.56
0.00
0.00
00.00
0.00
92.94
229.74
07
457.10
615.98
831.31
932.61
767.68
804.32
0.00
0.00
260.68
401.14
170.96
504.13
118.95
524.26
463.09
300.62
99.49
083.33
445.98
0.00
0.00
458.60
0.00
246.36
378.83
44,417
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
34
14
3
8
9
2
1
4
7
8
7
2
34
o
2
Variance
Percent
0.00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
- -----
64 02.04
553.16
392.98
577.81
968.29
676.89
804.32
0.00
500.00
230.13
071.98
724.06
255.51
159.35
524.26
063.44
294.50
285.26
916.67
429.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
404.78
546.57
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
46
23
10
4
4
2
21
2
30
8
1 1
2
27
Period
Budget
0.00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Current
Pct
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
7
8.11
4.07
1.84
0.87
2.56
2,23
0.00
0.09
3.70
0.36
5.35
1.44
1 .94
0.44
4.71
0,05
0.05
2.08
0.25
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.42
0.79
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Period
04
553.16
392.98
577 .81
968,29
676.89
804.32
0.00
500.00
230.13
071.98
724.06
255.51
159.35
524.26
063.44
294.50
285,26
916.67
429.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
. 0.00
404.78
546.57
02
Current
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
46
23
10
4
4
2
64
21
2
30
8
11
2
27
on
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
IJARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES AND ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
Descrlpt
2
4
2
4
24.67
07.76
83
00
o
28
228,286
00
o
76
39
28
228,286
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
28.5
227,524.83
00
o
292,388.32
00
o
93
50
292,388.32
ACTUAL BURDEN
79
45.77
60
o
927.73
58,597
68
0.00
0.00
255,006.76
------------
37,38 56
00
00
o
o
44.42
5
6
76
56
006
37,38
255
APPLIED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
4
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1995 thru JANUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
massie
3:34:49
. 04/06/95
Last Year Variance. to
This Period Last Year
Variance
Percent
Variance
to Budget
Period
Budget
Current
36.32
67.12
4.77
00.00
0.00
0.00
29.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
55.17
0.00
658.62
(50.92
0.00
0.00
4.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
62.24
----
6.60
112.34
392.30
372.97
30.65
0.00
0.00
616.72
0.00
344.88
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000.00
000.00
0.00
543.07
0.00
2.90
455.24
0.00
0.00
118.83
0.00
0.00
67.93
0.00
202.94
0.00
90 5
1
3
1
4
1
3
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
148.85
669.23
438.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
088.49
0.00
344.88
0.00
500.00
0.00
0.00
000.00
000.00
0.00
691,75
0.00
22.00
695.80
0.00
120.92
123.87
75.00
0.00
67.93
0.00
202.94
0.00
34,04
5
5
1
2
4
1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Pct
64
99
25
00
00
00
36
00
23
00
09)
00
00
70)
17 )
00
12)
00
00
30)
00
02)
02)
01 )
00
01 )
00
04)
00
01
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
5
Period
148.85
669.23
438,45
0.00
0.00
0.00
088.49
0.00
344.88
0,00
500.00
0.00
0.00
000.00
000.00
0.00
691.75
0.00
22.00
695.80
0.00
120.92
123.87
75.00
0.00
67.93
0.00
202.94
0.00
34.04
Current
5
5
1
2
4
1
Description
-----------
SALES, MARKETING & ADVERTISING
SALARIES - MANAGEMENT
SALARIES - SALESMEN
SALARIES - CLERICAL
OVERTIME PREMIUM
INCENTIVES & AWARDS
VACATIONS & HOLIDAYS
PAYROLL TAXES
PENSIONS
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
SALES RECRUITMENT
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
OUTSIDE MANPOWER
MARKET RESEARCH
PROMOTION
MEETINGS & SEMINARS
ADVERTISING - DIRECTORY
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
RENT - BUILDING
POSTAGE
TELEPHONE
OTHER UTILITIES
OFF ICE SUPPLI ES
INSURANCE - GENERAL
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENT - EQUIPMENT
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
DEPRECIATION
TAXES R/E & PIP
MISCELLANEOUS
92
350
29
00
o
5
34.224
00
o
96
5
34,224
TOTAL EXPENSE
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page 5
For periods JANUARY 1995 thru JANUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co,
INCOME STATEMENT
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to
Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Year
- -----------
3:34:52 massie
'04/06'95
4.76
( 1. 47
00.00
( 1 .52
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.19
07.84
0.00
95.09
0.00
73.22
49.98
69.78
0.00
61.65
3.49
0.00
64.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.87
076.94
698.97
57.75
116.92
529.82
0.00
0.00
708.61
165.25
202.94
736.54
0.00
18.30
418.49
463.09
0.00
878.44
116.52
0.00
400.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
------
588.58
8
4
2
1
4
2
4
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
461 .55
482.40
0.00
,084.77
,.529.82
0.00
0.00
000.00
343,45
202.94
538.86
0.00
50.00
709.48
139.96
0.00
103,84
260.21
0.00
500.00
89.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8
4
2
1
5
9
1
4
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
47
52
00
36
27
00
00
87)
06)
04)
66)
00
01
12
02
00
19
74
00
09
02
00
00
00
00
00
45
1
2
o
o
o
o
o
(0
( 0
( 0
( 1
o
[0
:0
:0
o
:0
o
o
o
o
o
.0
o
o
o
8
Period
461.55
482.40
0.00
084.77
529.82
0.00
0.00
000.00
343.45
202.94
538.86
0.00
50.00
709.48
139.96
0.00
103.84
260.21
0.00
500.00
89.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Current
8
4
2
1
5
9
1
4
Description
-----------
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER'S SALARIES
OFFICE SALARIES
OVERTIME PREMIUM
PAYROLL TAXES
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE EXPENSES
LEGAL & AUDIT
OFFICE EXPENSES
DEPRECIATION
INSURANCE - GENERAL
TAXES, FRANCHISES & LICENSES
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
TELEPHONE
OFF ICE SUPPLI ES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF AUTOS
POSTAGE
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
BUILDING OCCUPANCY
DONATIONS
DIRECTORS FEES
BAD DEBT EXPENSE
CHARGE TO ACME SEELY
42
00
o
42
48,496
48.496.42
TOTAL EXPENSES
Current Period-Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page 6
For periods JANUARY 1995 thru JANUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co.
INCOME STATEMENT
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to
Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Year
-- ---- .-------- ---- ---------- .----------
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OÒ
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.84 0.00 4,826.65 0.00 0.00 0.00
0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.29 0.00 7,403.09 0.00 8.029.97 <7.81 )
---- ---- ,-------- ---- ---------- ----------
2.13 0.00 2,229.74 0.00 8,029.97 52.30
0.00 0.00 0,00 0.·00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 (26.55 0.00 ( 12.08 119.78
0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.25 0.00 7,150.53 0.00 4,400.00 62.51
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0,03 0.00 155.78 0.00 537.41 <71.01 )
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.10 0.00 (549.03 0.00 (0.27 9,999.99
--- ---- -------- ---- -------- ----------
.32 0.00 7,570.33 0.00 3.874.94 95.37
04/06/95 3:34:55 massie
. .
Description Current Period
------------------------. -- .--------
INTEREST EXPENSE
INTEREST EXPENSE PARENT 0.00
INTEREST EXPENSE - VISA 0.00
INTEREST EXPENSE BANKS 4,826.65
INTEREST EXPENSE CAPTL LEASE 0.00
OTHER INTEREST EXPENSE 7,403.09
.--------
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE 2,229.74
OTHER INCOME & EXPENSE
INTEREST INCOME PARENT 0.00
INTEREST INCOME MONEY MARKET 0,00
INTEREST INCOME OTHER (26.55
CAPITAL GAINS 0,00
CAP IT AL LOSSES 0.00
RENTAL INCOME 7,150.53
INVESTMENT EXPENSE 0.00
BANK FEES 155.78
RESTRUCTURING EXPENSE 0.00
MISCELLANEOUS (549,03
--------
TOTAL OTHER INCOME & EXPENSE 7,570.33
Pag!!
Curr!!nt P!!riod Compar!!d to Prior P!!riods
For P!!riods Ending FEBRUARY 1995
Acm!! D!!sign T!!chnology Co
BALANCE SHEET
27 massi!!
3:36
, 1/06/95
;!.:
..J
.
Chang!! From
Last Y!!ar
Last Y!!ar
This Period
Change From
Last Period
Period
Balance
Last
This Period
Balance
......
97,223.59
0.00
245,223.08
0.00
1,231.77
0.00
4,040.65
90
0.00
698.00
0.00
838,21
0.00
040.65
8.705
42
49
8
0.00
77.58
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
42,846
06
68
0.00
743.50
0.00
069.98
0.00
0.00
082
63
28
5
49
00
08
00
98
00
00
05,929
o
921
o
069
o
o
387
5
D!!scription
-----------
CURRENT ASSETS
CASH
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
INSTALLMENT RECEIVABLES
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - CUST
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - GOVT
RESERVE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCTS
RESERVE FOR EST CREDIT
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE CONTRA
-
~
~
4
-
96
38,756.98
38,300.38
25,114.85
(4,634.72
0.00
0.00
87,945.75
03
258
4
241.64
597. 14
851.39
528.87
0.00
0.00
87,945.75
----------
963,273.29
9
978,8
162
467
106
314
77 .58
8,342.62
18,936.56
27,273.09
(6,699.22
0.00
0.00
0,00
---------
44,566.25
06
30,673.52
656.00
233.32
239.33
593.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
------
722.02
192
448
159
316
o
998.62
296.76
966.24
894.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
85
236
200
429
131
309
1 .
TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
INVENTORY
FINISHED GOODS
FINISHED PARTS
UORK IN PROCESS
RAU MATERIALS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
CAPITALIZED INDIRECT COSTS
INVENTORY CONTRA ACCOUNT
08,882.48
900.00
0.00
,537.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
66,000.00
3,900.00
0.00
54,229.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
330.00
0.00
23,229.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
330.00
0.00
537.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000.00
6
2
42
66
55.77
00
00
23
00
00
00
00
00
2,000
o
65,767
o
o
o
o
66,000
072
INVENTORY
OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
ADVACES TO EMPLOYEES
TRANSPORTATION CLAIMS
OTHER RECEIVABLES
NOTE RECV - RELATED PARTY
NOTE RECV - CUSTOMER
NOTE RECV - EMPLOYEES
INTEREST RECV-RELATED PRTY
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
TOTAL OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
TOTAL
"-'
95
637
75
29.28
58
90
22,899
867.33
o
33,767.23
J
.,¡
98
775
539
6
927
2,008
04
27,358
345.55
2,42
2,548,703.59
CURRENT ASSETS
TOTAL
oJ
.,¡
t
w
~
....
:~
.~
~
.:-
..,~
y
".
T
~\
~
~".
~.
1
J
1
j
~.
..
y
f
2
Page
04/06/95 3:38:35 massie Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
For Periods Ending FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co.
BALANCE SHEET
This Period Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Description Balance Balance Last Period This Period Last Year
------------------------ ----------- --. ---------- --------- ------------- ---------------
NOTES RECV - RELATED PARTIES 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PROPERTY, PLANT & EOUIPMENT
LAND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
IMPROVEMENTS TO LAND 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
BUILDINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00
MACHINERY & EOUIPMENT 455,057.22 454,072.55 984.67 451,662.98 3,394.24
FURN, FIXT & OFF MACHINES 40,160.67 34,840.67 5,320.00 34,840.67 5,320.00
EQUIP. UNDER CAPITAL LEASES 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00
TRUCKS & AUTOS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CONSTRUCTION IN PROCESS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
----------- --- ---------- .-------- .------------ ---------------
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS - COST 525,217.89 518,913.22 6,304.67 516,503.65 8,714.24
ALLO~ANCE FOR DEPRECIATION 160,306.94) 154,007.45 6,299.49 (84,531.51 (75,775.43
----------- --- ---------- .-------- .------------ ---------------
NET FIXED ASSETS 364,910.95 364,905,77 5.18 431,972.14 (67,061.19
OTHER ASSETS
PREPAID INSURANCE 2,254,34 8,627.17 6,372.83 1,683.00 571.34
PREPAID RENT 12,000.00 12,000.00 0.00 7,771.51 4,228.49
OTHER PREPAID EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,092.55 (6,092.55
PATENTS LESS AMORTIZATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
DEFERRED ORGANIZATION EXPENS 67,716.19 69,657.08 1.940.89 84,571.31 ( 1 6 , 855 . 12
OTHER DEFERRED EXPENSES 19,325.26 19,893.65 (568.39 26,145.94 (6,820.68
--- ---------- --- ---------- ----- ------------ ---------------
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 101,295.79 110,177.90 8,882 126,264.31 (24,968.52
--- ---------- --- ---------- ---- ----- ----- 0_-____--------
TOTAL ASSETS 3,014,910,33 2,896,429.22 8,48 2,567 64.06 447,746.27
3
Page
Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
For Periods Ending FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
BALANCE SHEET
Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Balance Last Period This Period Last Year
---------- ..------------ ------------ ----------------
670,742.07 121,564.86 331,766.94 460,539.99
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3,953.69 (3,736.07 896.25 (678.63
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
39,677.88 3,283.21 40,551.70 2,409.39
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
---------- ,------------ "---------- .----------
714,373.64 121,112.00 373,214.89 462,270.75
47,257.40 (1,405.90 42,719.32 3,132.18
42,166.13 (6,926.49 88,856.15 (53,616.51
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
51,157.46 5,333.03 25,487.43 31,003.06
22,515.46 211.15 5,806.56 16.920.05
31,214.36 (8,074.58 14,105.42 9,034.36
---------- ------------ ---------- ----------
194,310.81 0,862.79 176,974.88 6,473.14
180,000.00 0.00 182,044.00 (2,044.00
8,568.04 97.34 8,421.72 243.66
110,463.48 490.01 88,244.50 22,708.99
---------- -------- ---------- ----------
299,031.52 587.35 278,710.22 20,908.65
---------- -------- ---------- ----------
207,715.97 0,836.56 828,899.99 489,652.54
This Period
Balance
----------
792,306.93
0.00
0.00
217 . 62
0.00
42,961,09
0.00
0.00
----------
835,485.64
45,851.50
35,239.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
56,490.49
22,726.61
23,139.78
----------
183,448.02
180,000.00
8,665.38
110,953.49
----------
299,618.87
----------
318,552.53
04/06/95 3:39:07 maSSle
Description
------------------------.
CURRENT LIABILITIES
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
TRADE PAYABLES
PAYROLL ~.H. FEDERAL
PAYROLL ~.H. STATE ¿ LOCAL
SALES TAX
OTHER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
DEFERRED INCOME - SERVICE
DEFERRED INCOME - PENSION
DEFERRED INCOME - OTHER
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCRUED EXPENSES
SALARIES ¿ ~AGES
COMMISSIONS
PENSIONS/PROFIT SHARING
FEDERAL INCOME TAX
STATE ¿ CITY INCOME TAXES
TAXES - OTHER
INTEREST
OTHER ACCRUED EXPENSES
TOTAL ACCRUED EXPENSES
CURRENT PORTION LTD
BANKS
OBLIGATIONS-CAPITAL LEASES
NOTES PAYABLE-OTHER CURRENT
TOTAL CURRENT LTD
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
4
Page
04/06/95 3:40:22 maSS1e Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
For Periods Ending FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co.
BALANCE SHEET
This Period Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Description Balance ·Ba 1 ance Last Period This Period Last Year
------------------------ ----------- --- ---------- .--------- .------------ ----------------
LONG TERM DEBT
NATIONS BANK - NOTE 11 FIXED 131,408,23 131,408.23 0.00 129,364.23 2,044.00
NATIONS BANK - NOTE 12 LINE 180,000.00 195,000.00 15,000.00 360,000.00 (180,000.00)
VA. ECONOMIC DEV. AUT.-VRLF 469,966.10 477,772.77 <1,806.67 557,919.59 (87,953.49)
VEDCORP INC. 380,000.00 380,000.00 0.00 400,000.00 (20,000.00)
OBLIGATIONS-CAPITAL LEASES 6,465. 12 7,232.94 <167.82 14,036.20 <1,571.08)
NOTES PAYABLE-OTHER LONG TERM 125,000,00 125,000.00 0.00 0,00 125,000.00
--- ----------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 292,839.45 316,413.94 23,574.49 1,461,320.02 (168,480.57
DEFERRED INCOME TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CAPITAL
COMMON STOCK 20,000,00 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00
DEBENTURES PAYABLE 0,00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 115,000.00
PAID IN SURPLUS 480,000.00 480,000.00 0,00 480,000.00 0.00
--- ----------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
500,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 515,000.00 (15,000.00
RETAINED EARNINGS-BEGIN PERIOD 153,126.85) (153,126.85 0.00 (173,831.41 20,110.62
NET INCOME 56,645.20 25,426.16 31,219.04 (124,218.48 180,863.68
--- ----------- --------------- --------- ------------ ---------------
TOTAL CAPITAL 403,518.35 312,299.31 31,219.04 216,944.05 126:,514.30
---------------- --------------- ---- ----- ----- ---------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY 3,014,910.33 2,896,429.22 8,48 2,561 64.06 441,746.21
04/06/95 3:29:45 massie Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page
For periods FEBRUARY 1995 thru FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co.
INCOME STATEMENT
.
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to
Description Current Period Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Year
------------------------. ------------- -- -- .----- --, ---------- .---- ------------- ..------
GROSS SALES 595,920,77 (103.20 0.00 595,920.77 0.00 435,646.54 (36.19
RETURNS & ALLO~ANCES 12,807.91 (2.22 0.00 ·12,807.91 0.00 4,670.84 174.21
COMMISSIONS 5,692.46 (0,99 0.00 5,692,46 0.00 6,635.29 (14.21
------------- --------- .----- --. ---------- .---- ------------- ,,------
NET SALES 577,420.40 (100.00 0.00 577,420.40 0.00 424,340.41 (36.07
COST OF GOODS SOLD 462, 136. 12 (80.03 0.00 462,136,12 0.00 367,052.43 25.90
--------------- ------ ,----- --. .--------- .---- ------------- .------
GROSS PROFIT 15,284.28 (19.97 0.00 15,284.28 0.00 57,287.98 101 .24
SALES, MARKETING, & ADVRTISING 38,353.18 6.64 0.00 38,353. 18 0.00 28,507.86 34.54
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 41,253.47 7.14 0.00 41,253.47 0.00 39,732.88 3.83
INCENTIVES & PROFIT SHARING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.--------- .---- ----- --- .--------- ---- --------- .------
OPERATING EXPENSES 79,606.65 3,79 0.00 79,606.65 0.00 68,240.74 16.66
--------- ---- ----- --- --------- ---- -------- ------
NET OPERATING INCOME 35,677,63 6.18 0.00 35,677,63 0,00 0,952.76 425.74
INTEREST EXPENSE 11,295.27 1.96 0,00 11 ,295,27 0.00 8,887.61 27.09
OTHER INCOME OR EXPENSE (6,836.68 1 .18 0.00 (6,836.68 0.00 3,777.86 80.97
INCOME TAXES 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
- ------ --- ----- --- - ------ ---- ------- ------
NET INCOME 3 219,04 5.4 0.00 3 219.04 0.00 6,062.5 294.36
--.-.....
---
2
Page
or Year
995
Budget and PI'
thru FEBRUARY
Current Period Compared to
For periods FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
02 maSSle
3:30
04/06/95
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
------
36.79
74.21
14.21
54
84
29
646
670
635
435
4
6
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
595,920.11
12,801.91
5,692,46
Period
Budget
0.00
0.00
0.00
Current
Pct
03.20
(2,22
(0.99
Period
595,920.11
12,801,91
5,692.46
Current
Description
-----------
GROSS SALES
RETURNS & ALLOWANCES
COMMISSIONS
01
00
21
64
98
33
36
o
45
21
41
91
4
00
04
43
16
12
424.340
o
338
903
215
095
,
,
,
,
19
19
20
8
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
40
0.00
364.89
632.00
728.12
488.66
511,420
,
,
,
,
113
229
11
15
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
)
)
)
)
00
0.00
30.02
39,11
(2.03
(2,68
00
40
0.00
364.89
632,00
128.12
488.66
511,420
,
,
,
,
113
229
11
15
NET SALES
PURCHASED FOR RESALE-COST
MATERIALS
FACTORY BURDEN
PRODUCT BURDEN
INSTALLATION COSTS
34
3
321.552.35
00
o
214.21
430
00
o
14.5
214.21
430
COST OF GOODS SOLD
09
6.85
40.96
21.96
0.00
19 .19
0.00
0.00
0.00
52
06
815.61
314.81
918.35
0.00
112.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
188
96
40
3
(2
( 1
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
3
939.08
951,05
815.94
0.00
790.22
0,00
0.00
0,00
41,206
33
1
4
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
25.49
5.88
0.34
0.14
0.00
0.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
3
939.08
951,05
815.94
0.00
190.22
0.00
0.00
0,00
41,206
33
1
4
GROSS MARGIN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
PURCHASED MATERIAL VARIANCE
VARIANCE TO STANDARD
DISCOUNT ALLOCATION
SCRAP SALES
INTERIM INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT
PHYSICAL INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT
CAPITALIZED INVY INDIRECT COST
9
24
9
o
08
98
500
51,281
39
00
00
o
o
85
5,284.28
92
3
00
00
o
o
5.53
9,91
85
5,284,28
92
3
TOTAL OTHER FACTORY EXPENSES
GROSS PROFIT
3
Page
Budget and Prior Year
thru FEBRUARY 995
Current Period Compared to
For periods FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
massie
o
3:30
04/06/95
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Yeår
.
3.30
Variance
Percent
0.00
Variance
to Budget
--------
59,544.70
Period
Budget
0.00
Current
Pct
Period
Current
27.44
10.77
220.55
0.00
16.64
0.86
0.00
0.00
4.56
410.57
154.50
(1.19
4.08
0.00
2.11
56.33
(60.29
18.18
(40.94
0.00
0.00
<79.93
0.00
(28.36
631.28
44
741.05
097.69
610.41
968.29
776.48
804.32
0.00
0.00
315.83
916.76
959.21
504.13
118.95
524.26
180.21
144.17
350.07
083.33
813.04
0.00
0.00
480.41
0.00
313.85
529.41
553
·
·
,
·
·
,
,
·
,
,
,
52
32
18
3
4
1
2
9
8
7
2
26
6
o
1
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
723.86
047.12
573,03
968,29
735.84
914.32
0.00
0.00
060.06
680.71
346,01
402.89
409.35
524.26
731. 97
225,38
139.03
916.67
070.73
0.00
0.00
698.37
0.00
657.59
184.23
41,
20.
11 ,
4.
3,
2,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
7
4
25
8
7
2
26
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
·0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
3
7.23
3.47
2.00
0.86
2.38
2.24
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.81
4.39
1.46
1,28
0.44
4,63
0.04
0.02
2,06
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.29
1 ,94
o
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
544.70
723.86
047.12
573.03
968.29
735.84
914.32
0.00
0.00
060.06
680,71
346,01
402.89
409.35
524.26
731.97
225.38
139.03
916.67
070.73
0.00
0.00
698.37
0,00
657.59
184.23
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
59
41
20
11
4
3
2
7
4
25
8
7
2
26
Description
-----------
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPHENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
IJARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES AND ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
2
1
2
7
05
73
72
00
o
25
64
20
00
o
92
34
25
64
20
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
6.22
224.726.49
00
o
85.95
26
00
o
45.23
95
85
26
ACTUAL BURDEN
23.56
85
6
82
67
o
815
9
83
40
00
00
o
o
87
08
227,246
939
33
00
00
o
o
(.39.36
5.88
246.87
------
939.08
227
33
APPLIED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
4
Page
Budget and Prior Year
thru FEBRUARY 1995
Current Period Compared to
For periods FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
8 massie
3:30
04/06/95
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
29.03
59.52
(6.58
00.00
0.00
0.00
24.81
0.00
8.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
493.03
0.00
(1. 61
71.63
0.00
(90.90
4.24
(100.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.46
-----
34.50
673.03
230.76
399.73
61.30
0.00
0.00
551.73
0.00
344.88
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000.00
000.00
0.00
544·.11
0.00
8.70
810.81
0.00
629.93
118.83
75.00
0.00
67.93
0.00
202.94
0.00
788.12
o
3
1
4
1
2
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
771.68
153.84
307.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
936.74
0.00
454,88
0.00
500,00
0.00
0.00
000.00
000.0i>
0.00
227.09
0.00
8,56
824.25
0.00
57.31
123.87
0.00
0.00
67,93
0.00
202.94
0.00
705.68
3
5
1
4
1
3
4
Period
Budget
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Current
Pct
39
89
23
00
00
00
34
00
25
00
09
00
00
69
17
00
56
00
00
84
00
01
02
00
00
01
00
04
00
12
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
6
Period
771.68
153.84
307.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
936.74
0.00
454.88
0.00
500,00
0,00
0.00
000.00
000.00
0.00
227.09
0.00
8.56
824.25
0.00
57.31
123.87
0.00
0.00
67,93
0.00
202.94
0.00
705.68
Current
3
5
1
4
1
3
4
Description
SALES, MARKETING. & ADVERTISING
SALARIES - MANAGEMENT
SALARIES - SALESMEN
SALARIES - CLERICAL
OVERTIME PREMIUM
INCENTIVES & AWARDS
VACATIONS & HOLIDAYS
PAYROLL TAXES
PENSIONS
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
SALES RECRUITMENT
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
OUTSIDE MANPOWER
HARKET RESEARCH
PROMOTION
MEETINGS & SEMINARS
ADVERTISING - DIRECTORY
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
RENT - BUILDING
POSTAGE
TELEPHONE
OTHER UTILITIES
OFF I CE SUPPLI ES
INSURANCE - GENERAL
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENT - EOUIPMENT
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
DEPRECIATION
TAXES RIE & PIP
MISCELLANEOUS
28.507.86
00
o
38.342.45
00
o
64
38,342.45
TOTAL EXPENSE
5
Page
Budget and Prior Year
thru FEBRUARY 1995
Current Period Compared to
For periods FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
22 massie
3:30
04/061.95
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Yea~
0.00
0.48
00.00
(5.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(5.35
0.00
487.73
0.00
0.00
49.26
52.62
00.00
58.84
(4.80
0.00
72.81
62.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
692.32
870.11
84.00
907.82
529.82
0.00
0.00
000.00
440.81
202.94
736.54
0.00
0.00
152.89
437.19
58.00
528.62
469.82
0.00
575.00
47.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7
2
5
2
4
Variance
Percent
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Variance
to Budget
692.32
520.74
0.00
807.42
529.82
0.00
0.00
000.00
417.24
202.94
328.86
0.00
0.00
720.77
667.22
0.00
040.80
255.21
0.00
993.63
76.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7
1
5
4
1
4
Period
Budget
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Current
Pct
33
00
00
31
26
00
00
87)
07)
04)
75)
00
00
30
12
00
18
74
00
17
01
00
00
00
00
00
1
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
7
(
(
(
(
Period
692.32
520.74
0.00
807.42
529.82
0.00
0.00
000.00
417.24
202.94
328.86
0.00
0.00
720.77
667.22
0.00
040.80
255.21
0.00
993.63
76.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Current
7
1
5
4
1
4
Descrtption
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER'S SALARIES
OFFICE SALARIES
OVERTIME PREMIUM
PAYROLL TAXES
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE EXPENSES
LEGAL & AUDIT
OFFICE EXPENSES
DEPRECIATION
INSURANCE - GENERAL
TAXES, FRANCHISES & LICENSES
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
TELEPHONE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF AUTOS
POSTAGE
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
BUILDING OCCUPANCY
DONATIONS
DIRECTORS FEES
BAD DEBT EXPENSE
CHARGE TO ACME SEELY
3.83
732.88
39
00
o
253.47
4
00
o
4
253.47
4
TOTAL EXPENSES
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page 6
For periods FEBRUARY 1995 thru FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co.
INCOME STATEMENT
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to
Pct Budget to BUdget Percent This Period Last Yetr
-- ---- -------------- ---- ------------- ._---------
~
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0,73 0.00 4,198.30 0.00 2,202.22 90.64
0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1,23 0.00 7,096.97 0.00 6,685.39 6.16
---- ---- -------------- ---- ------------- ----------
1.96 0.00 1,295.27 0.00 8,887.61 27.09
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.02 0.00 (101.71 0.00 (104.62 (2.78)
0.04 0.00 (208.49 0.00 (3.04 6,758.22
0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.24 0.00 7,150.53 0.00 4,400.00 62.51
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.05 0.00 285.77 0.00 751.02 (61.95)
0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.06 0.00 338.28 0.00 (21 .22 (1,694.16)
- ---- -------- ---- -------- ----------
8 0.00 6,836.68 0.00 3,777.86 80.97
Period
0.00
0.00
98.30
0.00
096.97
Current
4
LEASE
25 maSSle
INTEREST EXPENSE
INTEREST EXPENSE PARENT
INTEREST EXPENSE - VISA
INTEREST EXPENSE BANKS
INTEREST EXPENSE CAPTL
OTHER INTEREST EXPENSE
3:30
on
04/06/95
Descript
295.27
0.00
101.71
208.49
0.00
0.00
7,150.53
0.00
285.77
0.00
338.28
7
NTEREST EXPENSE
OTHER INCOME & EXPENSE
INTERESl INCOME PARENT
INTEREST INCOME MONEY MARKET
INTEREST INCOME OTHER
CAPITAL <;AINS
CAP ITAL LOSSES
RENTAL INCOME
INVESTMENT EXPENSE
BANK FEES
RESTRUCTURING ·EXPENSE
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
836.68
6
& EXPENSE
INCOME
TOTAL OTHER
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1995 thru FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
massie
20
3:3
04/06/95
Last Year Variance fo
This Period Last Ye~r
71.07
97.38
36.79
59
79
86
477
492
947
692
8
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
22
24
19
84,655
16,763
16,343
Period
Budget
00
00
00
o
o
o
Current
Pct
87
46
42
02
( 1
( 1
Period
84,655.22
16,763.24
16,343.19
Current
Descrlption
GROSS SALES
RETURNS & ALLO~ANCES
COMMISSIONS
35
42.77
7
036.94
646,810.40
-----------
25,226.54
672
00
00
o
o
548.79
923,458,37
5
00
00
o
o
00
9
00
80
548.79
923,458,37
---------------
228,090,42
5
NET SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
7
25.44
9.02
0.00
804
57,858.78
82,321.46
0.00
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
42
72,577.33
89,749.89
0.00
090
228
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
8
6.30
7.79
0.00
9
72,577.33
89,749.89
0.00
GROSS PROFIT
SALES, MARKETING, & ADVRTISING
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE
INCENTIVES & PROFIT SHARING
5.80
24
80
40
00
o
62,327.22
00
o
o
4
62,327.22
OPERATING EXPENSES
57.2
39.06
88.26
0.00
953.70
917.58
652.80
0.00
4
6
7
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
65,763.20
01
01 )
00
23,525
14,407
o
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
5.7
04
25
00
2
1
o
65,763.20
01
01
00
23,525
14,407
o
INCOME
INTEREST EXPENSE
OTHER INCOME OR EXPENSE
INCOME TAXES
NET OPERATING
60
45
24,218.48
00
o
56,~45.20
00
o
4.92
56,645.20
INCOME
NET
2
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1995 thru FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
44 maSSie
3:3
04/06/95
Last Year Variance t~
This Period Last Year
-----~
71.07
97.38
36.79
59
79
86
477
492
947
692
8
1
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
84,655.22
16,763.24
16,343.19
Period
Budget
00
00
00
o
o
o
Current
Pct
(102.87
(1.46
(1,42
Period
84,655.22
16,763,24
16,343,19
Current
Description
GROSS SALES
RETURNS & ALLO~ANCES
COMMISSIONS
35
0.00
98.82
67.42
17.96
47.60
7
036.94
0.00
653.55
123.17
299.25
051.66
,
,
,
,
672
171
272
36
51
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
548.79
0.00
282.06
598.07
719.90
753. 17
------
413.20
,
,
,
,
5
341
455
29
26
853
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
)
)
)
)
00
0,00
29.64
39.56
(2.59
(2,32
00
548.79
00
06
07
90
17
o
282
598
719
753
,
,
,
,
5
341
455
29
26
NET SALES
PURCHASED FOR RESALE-COST
MATERIALS
FACTORY BURDEN
PRODUCT BURDEN
INSTALLATION COSTS
..
68
60
63
27
53
74
853,413.20
COST OF GOODS SOLD
58
01
56
54
00
41
00
00
00
35
( 0
33
o
51
o
o
o
3
40
35
75
00
73
00
00
00
909
09,743
5,580
2,711
o
2,352
o
o
o
40
00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
35.59
64
96
51
00
92
00
00
00
71,320
5,548
(909
o
5,914
o
o
o
298
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
25.89
19
48
08
00
51
00
00
00
6
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
35.59
320,64
548.96
909.51
0.00
914.92
0.00
0.00
0.00
298
71
5
5
GROSS MARGIN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
PURCHASED MATERIAL VARIANCE
VARIANCE TO STANDARD
DISCOUNT ALLOCATION
SCRAP SALES
INTERIM INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT
PHYSICAL INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT
CAPITALIZED INVY INDIRECT COST
45
7
39
804
682.71
54
25,226
5
00
00
o
o
7
42
045
090
70
228
00
00
o
o
08
8
6
9
7
42
045
090
70
228
TOTAL OTHER FACTORY EXPENSES
GROSS PROFIT
3
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1995 thru FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
58 massie
3:3
04/0£-/95
Last Year Variance ~o
This Period Last Year
____.3_
27.5
Variance
Percent
0.00
Variance
to Budget
--------
23,646.74
Current Period
Budget
---------------
0.00
Pct
Period
Current
Description
31.37
32.79
97.66
28.52
31.88
0.43
0.00
0.00
38.85
26.98
06.67
(2.06
30.42
0.00
11.29
16.88
(5.62
18.18
(41.30
0.00
0.00
(82.27
0.00
14.10
440.90
5
198.15
713.67
441.72
900.90
544.16
608.64
0.00
0.00
576.51
317.90
130.17
008.26
237.90
048.52
643.30
444.79
449.56
166.66
259.02
0.00
0.00
939.01
0.00
560.21
908.24
970
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
96
67
32
7
13
21
25
3
27
5
27
17
14
5
60
20
4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
277.02
440.10
150.84
936.58
412.73
718.64
0.00
500.00
290.19
752.69
070.07
658,40
568.70
048.52
795.41
519.88
424.29
833,34
500.19
0.00
0.00
698,37
0.00
062,37
730.80
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
88
43
22
9
28
25
38
6
56
16
18
5
53
23
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00·
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
74
67
77
92
86
47
23
00
04
33
59
87
45
61
44
67
05
04
07
22
00
00
06
00
35
37
o
7
3
1
o
2
2
o
o
3
o
4
1
1
o
4
o
o
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
1
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
74
277 .02
440.10
150.84
936.58
412.73
718.64
0.00
500,00
290.19
752.69
070,07
658,40
568.70
048.52
795.41
519,88
424,29
833.34
500.19
0.00
0.00
698.37
0.00
062.37
730.80
646
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
23
88
43
22
9
28
25
38
6
56
16
18
5
53
23
2
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
UARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES AND ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
3
2
4
5
4
5
o
2
8
355,280
00
o
429,927.53
00
o
37.33
429,927.53
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
22.40
32
452,25
00
o
553,574.27
00
o
07
48
553,574.27
ACTUAL BURDEN
80
o
40
35
342,507.92
-----------
09,743.40
00
00
o
o
63
64
482,253
320
7
00
00
o
o
88
9
6
4
482,253.63
64
320
7
APPLIED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
Pa9~ 4
Last Y~ar Varianc~ (0
This P~riod Last Y~~
---------- ------
21,785.37 32.75
6,623.06 63.41
2,772.70 (0.96
91.95 00.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
3,168.45 27.04
0.00 0.00
2,689.76 4.09
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
8,000.00 0.00
2,000.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2,087.24 87.75
0.00 0.00
11.60 63.45
6,266.05 4.05
0.00 0.00
629.93 71.71
237.66 4.24
75.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
135.86 0.00
0.00 0.00
405.88 0.00
0.00 0.00
878.27 15.78
--------- -----
57,858.78 25.42
Current P~riod Compar~d to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1995 thru FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
massi~
3:32
04/06"/95
Varianc~
Perc~nt
Variane~
to Budget
Period
Budget
Current
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
920.53
823.07
746.13
0.00
0,00
0.00
025.23
0.00
799.76
0.00
000.00
0.00
0.00
000.00
000.00
0.00
918.84
0,00
30.56
520.05
0.00
178.23
247.74
75.00
0.00
135.86
0.00
405.88
0.00
739.72
28
10
2
4
2
8
2
3
6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Pet
51
94
24
00
00
00
35
00
24
00
09
00
00
69
17
00
34
00
00
57
00
02
02
01
00
01
00
04
00
06
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
6
Period
28,920.53
10,823.07
2,746.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,025.23
0.00
2,799.76
0.00
1,000.00
0.00
0.00
8,000.00
2,000.00
0.00
3,918.84
0.00
30.56
6,520.05
0,00
178.23
247.74
75.00
0.00
135.86
0.00
405.88
0.00
739.72
Current
Descr1ptlon
-----------
SALES, MARKETING & ADVERTISING
SALARIES - MANAGEMENT
SALARIES - SALESMEN
SALARIES - CLERICAL
OVERTIME PREMIUM
INCENTIVES & AWARDS
VACATIONS & HOLIDAYS
PAYROLL TAXES
PENSIONS
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
SALES RECRUITMENT
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
OUTSIDE MANPOWER
MARKET RESEARCH
PROMOTI ON
MEETINGS & SEMINARS
ADVERTISING - DIRECTORY
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
RENT - BUILDING
POSTAGE
TELEPHONE
OTHER UTILITIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
INSURANCE - GENERAL
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENT - EQUIPMENT
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
DEPRECIATION
TAXES RIE & PIP
MISCELLANEOUS
00
o
60
72,566
00
o
30
60
72,566
TOTAL EXPENSE
Year Page 5
.
Last Year Variance t'tl
This Period Last Year
________L
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior
For periods JANUARY 1995 thru FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
5 massie
3:32
~04/06795
.
Current
)
)
)
)
)
2.44
5.68
00.00
(3.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
25.51
0.00
841.41
0.00
173.22
(5.49
(10.34
100.00
(60.34
(0.83
0.00
(24.37
252.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.02
769.26
569.08
141.75
024.74
059.64
0.00
0.00
708.61
606.06
405.88
473.08
0.00
18.30
571.38
900.28
58.00
407.06
586.34
0.00
975.00
47.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
------
321 .46
IS
27
4
3
2
9
5
8
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
153.87
003.14
0.00
892.19
059.64
0.00
0,00
000.00
760.69
405.88
867,72
0.00
50.00
430.25
807.18
0.00
144.64
515.42
0.00
493.63
165.64
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0,00
3
3
16
26
3
o
2
2
8
Period
Budget
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Pct
40
26
00
34
27
00
00
87)
07)
04)
20)
00
00
21
07
00
19
74
00
13
01
00
00
00
00
00
1
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
7
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Per10d
16,153.87
26,003.14
0,00
3,892.19
3,059,64
0.00
0.00
0,000.00
760.69
405.88
3,867.72
0.00
50.00
2,430.25
807.18
0,00
2,144.64
8,515.42
0.00
493.63
165.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Current
on
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER'S SALARIES
OFFICE SALARIES
OVERTIME PREMIUM
PAYROLL TAXES
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE EXPENSES
LEGAL & AUD IT
OFFICE EXPENSES
DEPRECIATION
INSURANCE - GENERAL
TAXES, FRANCHISES & LICENSES
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
TELEPHONE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF AUTOS
POSTAGE
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
BUILDING OCCUPANCY
DONATIONS
DIRECTORS FEES
BAD DEBT EXPENSE
CHARGE TO ACME SEELY
Descrlpt
82
00
o
89
89,749
00
o
79
89
749
89
TOTAL EXPENSES
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page 6
For periods JANUARY 1995 thru FEBRUARY 1995
Acme Design Technology Co.
INCOME STATEMENT
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance t~
Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Yea~
-- ---- ----------- --------- -------- ------_!.
..
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.78 0.00 9,024.95 0.00 2,202.22 309.81
0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.26 0.00 14,500.06 0.00 4,715.36 (1.46
---- ---- ---------- ---- -------- ------
2,04 0.00 23,525.01 0.00 6,917.58 39.06
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.01 0.00 (101.71 0.00 (104.62 (2.78
0.02 0.00 (235.04 0.00 (15.12 454.50
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.24 0.00 (14,301.06 0.00 8,800.00 62.51
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.04 0.00 441,55 0.00 1,288.43 (65.73
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.02 0.00 (210.75 0.00 (21 .49 880.69
--- ---- ------- ---- -------- -----
.25 0.00 4,407.0 0.00 7,652.80 88.26
04/06/95 3:32:20 mass1e
. .
Descript10n Current Period
------------------------ -- ---------
INTEREST EXPENSE
INTEREST EXPENSE PARENT 0.00
-I NTEREST' ·EXPENSE- - V'I SA 0.00
INTEREST EXPENSE BANKS 9,024.95
INTEREST EXPENSE CAPTL LEASE 0,00
OTHER INTEREST EXPENSE 14,500,06
---------
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE 23,525.01
OTHER INCOME & EXPENSE
INTEREST INCOME PARENT 0.00
INTEREST INCOME MONEY MARKET (101.71
INTEREST INCOME OTHER (235.04
CAPITAL GAINS 0.00
CAPITAL LOSSES 0.00
RENTAL INCOME 4,301.06
INVESTMENT EXPENSE 0,00
BANK FEES 441.55
RESTRUCTURING EXPENSE 0.00
MISCELLANEOUS (210.75
-------
TOTAL OTHER NCOME & EXPENSE 4,407.0
"CD'.. n964pJp
. -- .. ..- .-.._.______.3~7
r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
. ;' " ""'- ------
., It; I? D \lV}' I,! ..-.
'..-,.- ~- I-::!~·~~~-JL~~~..L~L,~
MAR· 0,.
March 29, 1995
OF SUp<:D, ,.~ _.
'_-o.,-~,,,~_~~=.~:_,,~~,~,::._r .' .',
Centel Cellular Company of Charlottesville
c/o M. E. Gibson, Jr
Tremblay & Smith
P. O. Box 1585
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: SP-95-0 1 Centel Cellular Company of Charlottesville
Dear Mr, Gibson:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March 28, 1995, unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that
this approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Tower height shall not exceed 200 feet;
2. Compliance with Section 5.1,12 of the Zoning Ordinance;
3. There shall be no lighting of the tower unless required by a federal agency, All tower
lighting shall be shielded so as to minimize visibility from the ground;
4, Staff approval of additional antennae installation. No administrative approval shall
constitute or imply support for or approval of, the location of additional towers, antennae,
etc., even if they may be part ofthe same network system as any antennae
administratively approved under this section.
e
e
e
towers on this site is available. Staffhas included in this report discussion on the nature of
cellular telephone technology,
STAFF COMMENT:
Staff will address the issues of this request in three sections:
1. Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance,
2. Section 4.10.3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Characteristics of Cellular Telephone Technology.
Section 31.2..4.1 of the Zonilll! Ordinance
Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the ri~ht to issue all ~pecial use
pennits pennitted hereunder. Special use pennits for uses as provided in this ordinance
may be issued U'pon a findin~ by the Board of Su¡>ervisors that such use will not be of
substantial detriment to adiacent property.
The nearest dwelling to the proposed tower site is located approximately 400 feet distant. This
tower is proposed to be located approximately 400 feet from the nearest residential property,
The tower will have limited visibility fonn adjacent residential properties and Rt. 29, Lighting
of the tower is unlikely due to the fact that the tower is under 200 feet in height. Should this
special use pennit be approved, staff has recommended as a condition no lighting except as
required by the F .A.A. or other federal agencies,
Staff opinion is that the proposed tower will not limit use of any adjacent private property or be
of substantial detriment to those properties.
that the character of the district will not be chan~ed thereby.
This tower will be a stand alone facility. This will result in a change in the appearance of the
area. Staff does recognize this introduces a new tower to a location at which no towers exist.
Multiple stand alone tower locations could ultimately have the cumulative effect of changing the
character of the County,
Staff notes that this site is zoned HI which is anticipated as an intensely developed district and is
intended to accommodate uses which are a potential public nuisance. This use is in keeping with
the intent and character of the district.
2
e
e
e
and that such use will be in harmony with the pw:pose and intent of this ordinance.
Staff has reviewed the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as stated in Sections 1.4, 1.5
and 1.6 with particular reference to Sections 1.4., 1.4.4, and 1.5 (Attachment F). All of these
provisions address, in one form or another, the provision of public services. The use of cellular
telephones clearly provides a public service as evidenced by the expanded and rapid increase in
use. Sprint Cellular is a public utility as identified by the State, Based on the provision of a
public service, staff opinion is that this request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the
ordinance.
with the uses permitted by ri~ht in the district.
This site is an industrial district as is the nearest property, The proposed tower will not affect the
current uses, other by-right uses available on this site or by-right uses on any other property.
with additional reiulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance.
Section 5.1.12 of the ordinance contains regulations governing tower facilities and appropriate
conditions are proposed to ensure compliance with this provision of the ordinance.
and with the public health. safe~ and ~eneral welfare.
The provision of increased communication facilities may be considered consistent with the
public health and safety and general welfare by providing increased communication services in
the event of emergencies and increasing overall general communication services.
Section 4.10.3.1 of the Zonin~ Ordinance
Section 4,10.3.1 states:
The height limitations of this chapter shall not apply to barns, silos, farm buildings,
agricultural museums designed to appear as traditional farm buildings, residential
chimneys, spires, flag poles, monuments or transmission towers and cables,; smokestack,
water tank, radio or television antenna or tower, provided that except as otherwise
permitted by the commission in a specific case, no structure shall be located closer in
distance to any lot line than the height of the structure; and, provided further that such
structure shall not exceed one hundred (100) feet in height in a residential district. This
height limitation shall not apply to any of the above designated structures now or
hereafter located on existing public utility easements,
By the requirements of this provision the proposed tower would need to be located a minimum of
180 feet from the edge of the property, The proposed tower is located approximately 25 feet
from the edge of the property line. This is the highest point on the property.
3
e
Staff opinion is that this provision is designed to prevent undue crowding of the land and to
prevent safety hazards should a tower fall. Historically, towers reviewed by the County are
approved subject to a condition requiring approval of a tower designed to collapse in the lease
area in the event of structural failure (such a condition is proposed by staff for this request). This
condition protects the public safety. Relocation of the tower is an option, however, this may
result in a taller tower. Staff is able to support this request should the special use pennit be
approved.
Characteristics of Cellular Telephone Technolo~y
The Board has previously requested staff research future tower needs in the County as related to
communication trends or technology. Although staff is still researching technology and demand,
staff can provide the following information regarding cellular technology. The technology of
cellular phones results in a demand for tower locations unlike the demands of other users of the
airwaves, The public has general familiarity with commercial broadcast on A.M., F .M, and
Television, including wireless cable. A.M. stations generally require a cluster of towers in low
locations. This is due to the fact that this type of broadcast relies on ground modulation for the
transmission of the signal. F.M. and television, including wireless cable broadcast utilize single
towers for broadcast. Towers for this type of use are generally found at the highest available
location, These broadcast are generally only receivable in a line of sight with the tower.
However, with the use oflarge wattage for the transmission (in this area up to 5,000,000 watts)
small obstructions will not block the signal. This characteristic allows a single broadcast
e location to serve a broad area.
All of the commercial broadcasts listed above are received in a single direction. That is, the
broadcast is made from the tower and received by the individual with no return of information.
Cellular use differs from standard commercial broadcasts in several ways which results in a
different demand for tower locations.
Cellular broadcast rely on line of sight for the transmission and reception of signals, This results
in the need to locate towers at higher elevations. The broadcast power at the cellular tower is
limited to 100 watts, effective radiating power. At this low power small obstructions, including
but not limited to foliage, can block signals, Even if the transmission power could be increased,
(the signal strength is limited by the F.C.C.), transmission range is limited by the power of the
hand held or car phone unit. The power of the personal units ranges from approximately 0,6 to 3
watts. This low power limits the broadcast range and increases the potential of obstruction of the
signal from small obstructions. Alone these two transmission power limitations result in the
need for multiple tower locations,
e
Another factor resulting in increased demand for tower locations is the limitation on the number
of calls which can be processed at each tower location at a given time. Currently, one cellular
provider has indicated that on one given hour, peak hour, up to 4,000 blocked calls were
recorded. These blocked calls are due in part to the limitation on the handling capacity of the
4
e
e
e
existing cellular towers. Increases in technology may enable each tower location to
accommodate more calls at on time. However, the limiting factor will be and is the number of
channels available for cellular telephone use. Using multiple towers effectively increases the
number of available channels in the system, This is due to "handing off' of calls which occurs
automatically within the cellular system, That is, when an individual places a call, the nearest
tower receives that call and utilizes a channel to complete the call. (As an individual moves
away from the original tower another tower takes over the call.) The fewer number of towers
within the system the fewer number of calls which can be handled. As the system matures the
coverage area for each tower is reduced due to the placement of new towers. These new towers,
by virtue of their reduced coverage area may be constructed at lower elevations.
Cellular use requires uninterrupted service, particularly for data transmission, such as faxes and
computer connections, This sets a high standard of reliability and quality. Technology to reduce
the need for multiple towers, such as satellite technology, currently is unavailable. The use of
monopole, guyed or free standing lattice towers is possible. The use of existing structures for the
provision of cellular coverage is preferred by the County and the service providers, due to
reduced cost. However, as has been stated previously the nature of cellular communication is
such that limited opportunities to use existing structures exists.
SUMMARY:
The hilly to mountainous terrain of Albemarle County, which results in "dead spots" in a cellular
system, has resulted in a number of requests for cellular towers, This tower request is due to
both terrain and a need to increase the capacity of the cellular system to accommodate the
increased usage of cellular technology, This request is not located within a "tower farm" as is
encouraged by the County, No existing structures were found that could provide the needed
coverage. The applicant has been working with emergency service providers to accommodate
their needs. This tower is located along an existing highway corridor and serves, in part, the
users of that corridor. Due to the character of cellular technology, additional stand alone towers
are likely.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Recommended Conditions of Approval:
1.
Tower height shall not exceed 200 feet;
2,
Compliance with Section 5.1.12 of the Zoning Ordinance;
3.
There shall be no lighting of the tower unless required by a federal agency. All tower
lighting shall be shielded so as to minimize visibility from the ground;
5
e
e
e
4.
Staff approval of additional antennae installation. No administrative approval shall
constitute or imply support for or approval of, the location of additional towers, antennae,
etc" even if they may be part of the same network or system as any antennae
administratively approved under this section;
5, The tower must be designed and adequate separation provided to property lines such that
in the event of structural failure, the tower and components will remain within the lease
area;
6, Tower shall be located within lease area shown on Attachment C.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Location Map
B - Tax Map
C - Sketch Plan
D - Sections 1.4, 15. & 1.6
----------------------
I:\GENERAL\SHARE\JANICE\SP951,RPT
6
(',:~
e
!iiliI
~
u
MOUNTAIN
,-
..
ATI'ACHMENT A
JNT AIN
,'t'.~,> '-,
~/", ""~~."
,l' .
80
,if
",
G'~o
'It"
0"
'"
~
~"
"\
.1 ~
'.
..
I6ïõl
... ,~ 'Tt:__\
... ..
l'ì~
II::.~
@] \
"-
¡:J
I
;.;:
~
c.;
,~
\
~
.¡..
..~
..
,
,
",';
..
0,' ..
.....'. ~ @J
""
,,"
;~
~¡{'
\
I
.,
.'
\
\
""
\
.~.
,.,.'......_...,..._~~.. .--.~
... ",-...~~..~.....................~....,._..-.;...-._..
...---......-
.'".'...-..-...,..~.-:.
ALBEMARLE
-
c-
-
A'lTACHMEm' B
10
10C
10D
10E
lOr;
10H
lor
10.
10l
SCALE IN fEn
~.:......:~.o
RIVANNA DISTRICT
SECTION 32
..
~
/
ATl'ACHMENl' C
e
UN/ V. OF
A iÆRAG£ TR£[
H[lGH T =
1"= 2000'
¡
SET _. THE
RO(1)... -·'4GW
PROPOSED -4' J( 8~
GENERA TOR ~::--_____
PROPOSED CHAIN-LINK
FENCE 0.5' INSIDE LEAS
AREA BOUNDARY LINES.
e
ENnRE LEASE AREA TO
GRADED AND GRA 'ÆLED.
R,
7-4~
~
Io.....¡
~
~
~ ~
~
~
Io.....¡ CJ
~ \.()
E---t
SPRINT - All ~
L. ~
SlTUA TED IN RIV/;
e
BEGINNING A T THE IN
29, THENCE ALONG n
DRI'Æ 0.2% UILES IN A
CORNER OF TAX UAP ,.
SAID PROPERTY LINE"'
N 36'-49"9" E, 25.-4"
20' ACCESS EASEUENT;0R
N 77'-46'06" W. '69.~ULAR
SPRINT CEUULAR LEAS
ALONG SAID LEASE LlN
THE POINT OF BEGlNNI!' #32-67
THENCE S -4179'#1" W
LINE OF THE NOW OF ~ .ÐR/V go
ALONG SAID PROPERI
BEING A COMMON COI COUNTY. VIRCINIA
NOW OR FORMERL Y UN " .
PROPERTY; THENCE AiLE: 1 = 30'
N 4'79'-48" E, 47.'-4' Ti
S -48'-40"2" E, 35.00' 'ATES. PC.
SPRINT LEASE AREA;· PLANNERS
TAX UAP 132-67 AND CO. · PRINCE CEORGE CO.
LEASE AREA - '525 S'
J.N.:9501-06
, .
e
1.4.4
e 1.5
e
".'-""·~-"·_·ß v·~- .. _..~..~ .."., -
~......u ,__
PURPOSE AND INTENT
A'ITACHMENI' D
This ordinance, insofar as is practicable, is intended to be in accord
with and to implement the Comprehensive Plan of Albemarle County
adopted pursuant to the provisions of Title 15.1, Chapter 11, Article
4, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and 11as the purposes and intent
set fO!-'th in Title 15.1, Chapter 11, A~ticle 8.
As set forth in section 15.1-427 of the Code, this ordinance is
intended to improve public health, safety, convenience and welfare of
ci tizens I)f Albemarle County, Virginia, and to plan fór the future
development of communities to the end that transportation systems be
carefully planned; that new community centers be developed with
adequate highway, utility, health, educational and recreational
facilities; that the needs of agriculture, industry and business be
recognized in future growth; that residential areas be provided with
healthy surroundings for family life; that agricultural and forestal
land be preser11ed; and that the growth of the community be consonant
\Jith the efficient and economical use of public funds. (Added ')-9-92)
Therefore be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors' of Albemarlp-
County, Vit-ginia, for the purposes of promoting the health, safety,
convelJience and general welfare of the public and of planning for the
future development of the community, that the zoning ordinance of
Albemarle County, together with the official zoning map adopted by
reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance, is designed:
To facilitate the provision of adequate police and fire protection,
disaster evacuation, civil defense, transportation, water, sewerage,
flood protection, schools, parks, forests, playgrounds,. recre~tional
facilities, airports and other public requirements;
RELATION TO ENVIRONMENT
This ordinance is designed to treat lands which are similarly situated
and environmentally similar in like manner with reasonable considera-
tion for the existing use and character of properties, the Comprehen-
sive Plan, the suitability of property for various uses, the trends of
growth or change, the current and future land and water requirements
of the community for various purposes as de~ermined by. population and
economic studies and other studies, the transportation requirements of
the community, and the requirements for airports, housing, schools,
parks, playgrounds, recreation areas and other public services; for
the conservation of natural resources; and preservation of flood
plains, the preservation of agricultural and forestal land, the con-
servation of properties and their values and the encouragement of the
most appropriate use of land throughout the county, (Amended 11-1-89)
to C~:~~Hd 4~.l'd!q'i_.
f.;', CJ;2Ç41q~2~
March 29, 1995
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
f,'
"... ._,. "'-"_..~--_..,,,
'~i) C'ç¡:
" qr
John W. Greene
Earthtech
1115 Fifth Street, SW
Charlottesville, VA 22902-6465
RE: SP-95-02 Crestar Bank
Dear Mr. Greene:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March 28, 1995, recommended
approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors, Please note that this approval
is subject to the following condition:
I. Modification of the drive-in lane entrance such that two-way traffic is permitted or that
clear signage and pavement markings are placed to indicate the intended direction of
vehicle travel.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and
receive public comment at their meeting on Avril 19. 1995, Any new or additional information
regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least
seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me,
Sincerely,
~¡µ
Ronald A. Lilley ð
Senior Planner
RAL/jcw
cc: EI~ey
Jo Higgins
Amelia McCulley
e
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
RON LILLEY
MARCH 28, 1995
APRIL 19, 1995
SP-95-02 CRESTAR BANK
Applicant's Proposal: Crestar Bank would like to expand and relocate the existing dri.ve-in
window at their Albemarle Square branch office, providing three drive-in lanes instead of one.
Petition: To grant a Special Use Permit for a Drive-In window associated with a financial
institution in the CO, Commercial Office zoning district [23.2.2.5] in order to create two
additional drive-in windows. Property, described as Tax Map 61, Parcel 123A, is 1.186 acres
and is located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Rio Road and Route 29 North, at the
Albemarle Square Shopping Center, within Neighborhood 2 in the Rio Magisterial District.. A
location and zoning map is included as Attachment A and a copy of the proposed site plan
amendment is included as Attachment B.
e
Character of the Area: The area around this property is urban, with various commercial uses
and heavily-travelled roads in the immediate vicinity. The building on the subject parcel houses
a bank, radio station, and insurance and investment offices and is accessed through the
Albemarle Square Shopping Center parking area.
RECOMMENDATION: Staffhas reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of
Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance and recommends approval.
STAFF COMMENT:
The additional drive-in windows represent a moderate expansion of the existing use, Crestar
Bank operates a separate drive-thruJATM facility just north of the subject facility (on the other
side of the Outback Steakhouse in the Albemarle Square Shopping Center), but has indicated that
they would no longer operate that facility once these additional drive-in windows are
constructed. Regarding the criteria for issuance of a special use permit, staff opinion is that:
.
The use will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property;
while some additional traffic would be generated by this expansion, the additional
windows are configured such that reasonable circulation between the bank parcel and the
shopping center parcel will be maintained.
.
the character of the district will not be changed;
this is just a moderate expansion of the existing use, will be of limited visibility, and
should not have any significant impact on the character of the existing commercial area.
e
1
e
.
the use will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and
with the uses in the area;
the drive-in windows would be consistent with those presently in the area and with the
purposes of the Commercial Office district.
· the use will be consistent with public health and welfare.
there is nothing unusually hazardous or objectionable about the proposed use.
The major concerns for this request relate to its potential impact on local traffic, local circulation,
and confonnance to Architectural Review Board recommendations.
e
Local Traffic Since some of the traffic from this facility would impact Route 29 and Rio Road,
consideration should be given to the possible impacts to the capacity of those roads. The Board
policy that rezonings along Route 29 North should not generate more traffic than current zoning
allows can be taken into account for this special use pennit, although no rezoning is involved.
According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, the
creation of two additional drive-in windows would result in approximately 822 additional trips
(over the present one drive-in window volume) per day at this facility. This is still less than the
increase that could result if the entire building were used for bank operations rather than a
significant portion of the building being used for general offices. Based on building square
footage, the Albemarle Square Shopping Center presently generates on the order of 10,000 trips
per day. In tenns of overall traffic from Albemarle Square, it is not known whether an increase
will result from this expansion, since the existing drive-thru facility to the north (two drive-in
windows plus an ATM) would not be operated by Crestar Bank. However, the facility could end
up being used by another bank, generating the same level of use. Staff opinion is that the level of
increase that could be expected is not a major issue in the context of the overall traffic generation
from Albemarle Square, as long as an acceptable circulation pftraffic would be maintained, The
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has commented that this modification to the
existing drive-thru should not have any significant impact on road infrastructure,
e
Local Circulation The proposed site plan amendment should provide for adequate circulation
of vehicles at the drive-in windows and out of the drive-in lane. Circulation around the main
parking area and the entrance to the drive-in lane could be improved with the drive-in lane
entrance (the northern-most entrance within the shopping center) being made wide enough to
allow both entrances and exits. Based on on-site observation, vehicles use this one-way entrance
to both enter and exit the site. Although this circulation deficiency does not result from the
creation of additional drive-in windows, it may be exacerbated by the likely increase in usage of
the drive-in entrance. This entrance was originally made one-way (entrance only) to overcome
some circulation and sight distance problems that resulted from the fonner entrance onto Route
29 that served this parcel (marked as "access closed" on the proposed plan). Since the Route 29
entrance is now closed, the widening of the drive-in lane entrance would no longer be
2
e
e
e
problematic in terms of conflicts with Route 29 traffic. However, the most logical place to widen
the drive-in lane entrance is actually off of the applicant's property and the applicant may not be
able to secure the rights to widen the entrance on that side. An alternative would be to widen the
entrance southward, which would entail losing at least one parking space and the loss or
relocation of a mature tree. Short of such measures, clear signage and pavement markings about
the intended travel directions could help minimize the potential for circulation conflicts at the
drive-in entrance,
Architectural Review Board Recommendations The Architectural Review Board (ARB) has
reviewed this proposal and recommends approval of the special permit, with several design
conditions (see Attachment C), The applicant has indicated a willingness to comply with the
design recommendations of the ARB, which will be imposed at the time of site plan review.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval of this special use permit request, with the following condition:
1. Modification of the drive-in lane entrance such that two-way traffic is permitted or that
clear signage and pavement markings are placed to indicate the intended direction of
vehicle travel.
----------------
A TT ACHMENTS:
A - Location Map with Zoning
B - Preliminary Site Plan
C - Architectural Review Board recommendations
A:\SP9502.RPT
3
ALBEMARLE
COUNTY
ATTACHMEN"T ~
[Page D
"
-.c
,
------
-- - - --- =---=- -- ---_~- n\
--~----- --~--
~---------
-..-._~----~
~----- -----
--~
------
------
"-- ---
---------.-
---'-'-
~---~-
~
/ I :
/
~....,
-:..-..
-
~.....
-
---
--.-
I
"
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
I Page 21
I
I
I
45 r'-
r-- I 7!..y c~ ',\\\i\Y 12~ 1204 ~
I,,.. ~ ~
IA . ~
~ ~
~-i~~ . W7/0 - cs; ':: :~" ~ '" '" R';' "::"0:", ~" ~\>
. · ~ Z2 .WI" '9 ~ 'I .. ./y, "DO '. ""'" ~~:\:
$A -'>' T·'......· "", I~/~!". 'n ~ ~ ~""",,'\'ft,'
~ ..... '!> '.~~" '"
I ':> ..' R: ....' . ï/ ~~
I ïl. I ...
¢,'it:lrirl .. no '/ I'¡'~ '"
IIc I J '.I.
1....::-.. n.. rJ¡ ~, 'l ~ "'-
I~-.~'- ~..,!.f/. .... 'w ~ ~..~. I
'_;>0,0 ··.c,,= ~.,,'" I - .À~---<
"<.J.."!- - c.'~'"'::J =_ YCTIOtI ~::;~ ~~~. ;:I~'" ~~liZ.c.. ~
, -=-_.-:-__ .::0. ----""""'~, 'I. '" ¡1f1'~
e:..., ~ "" ~ .----JiI=}:-.. r,pl'...l ,\' 'I ~ ., e-.....,...
< ~~. ~ ~--' '.....~_-~..~~Ä..~~--:> 'ÍÌI ~'l .' I ~ ~\-
.,.....> ~ ~ ;§ 5¡;;;::: _~'iø.-...... - -----W~-.., ~ft ~
~ ..> ~ ~ § ~ ' _~ - -~.'f, ~:_.~ . I /~ """ .... \
o ìl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u:"- ~'::::.:.~ · (_ ~....~ ...""-':::;¡",.. /1-
..,~ic ~~~ ..~"'\~- .... ~- - .~~~.'7=~;F:.ßL~.-.\;-~'~-
C' ....~ ./ c;- .....C',--
~ ~~ ~ ",-¿," ---- !~: ---.--- - . -
~'\ I~ ~. -, ..' - /' , .
e, \~.'. " '-'" / .- - - '"", --- :.: I
~~-. _~\__ 7 CITY ð. ~ _ Q I
=-...-=- \~ .__~H":""U< .. _ ~.f/.' ~,
'i/ ".. --~ '\--- ~ /f ~Y--
~-,;~--iË~'~ -' ~~~ ,~r~ R~ t_~
~CDM- . -tItIIr'I'iI-~- "'~ ~,. ~' X --' @Jì
//H ---- -.-./ \. :~;b '-- I~ '.!If
~_/~f/ -- N/J~~.".. . -
/ CIA 6 f~'.,-:~~, '~~.~
_ NOTE~ ALL AREAS MARKED· WITH ~~~....~ ARE ZONED /, "-I'~ h~~'" I-
PRD WITH A DENSITY OF R 18 UNLESS OTHERWISE / J'/~\'~ ~ ~~~!lON ~~. '._==--- _
- _/J'/ "'.\.~ ~ ~--"':"~ ........~ y~
- NOTED. ~ I'/. \\:., ~;I . ~ '/~"..
- . 7J;" 'n... '. ·,1....', ~ ~~~
,., _ . ~~.o/ .
- II'I \ :r'~ C1 1::\.'''' ~. "0 - ~- -
'\ \\ "y 1// \" ¿,~ f; . L?-.........'" .t"" \
"" ..0/ /// " ~... \
" If I '-, I 1 I woo............ \
/ j/ . .. ti;I ----...,
/ // .!!.,~ '" I
III q;: '"i3. - r~
Uf I l _--
-, ~ /J . J T........
N/~ ----1 I I
II/I ~ .-
//// ~
1/11 ..... "-
'II A
'ß "
RA
~.:.-_..
F :..:.-...-:--
....:~-=
-=~:I;;n~· --
--¡¡:XI a X2
.. .-:: FOUR
-..!.£A5 ~~~
--"':~c0
SCY
I.~D;;:/
024(
R15
C1j~c
.. ~
·
·
·
·
·
·
G2
·
·
·
·
·
i
-~ - . ---
-
--
---.
.
,,-
---
-
.
\
,
~
.
I'·
.-
.
77
JACK JOUETT, RIVANNA AND
CHARLOTTESVILLE DISTRICTS
.
-
---
tc&I .. raT
- -
SECTION
61
PAGE NUMBER 23
ATTACHMENT·B
.f
}
, .' ------~1--- --~---------~
----. ------------- ---. . .
-:- .... - ...~ .. :
,.. t . ~/ ~ l l
" !:>. z.,· :5~' ",,-~. 'Toð. 78' .... SJ .... . ..
-- -- . -- - -
1 , ...... f :;.. "~~'..r ,.er.."cc. _... ... - ..:..- 1
r-....:..¿··· .
, "'........... . ..,... .. I
__-.:.:.. ~~...?--.~.~._- ~.~.::T---::::.- ---:~~~.'-- .""\ _.:- l -: ---L ------ -
" ~ (':fTfY~l, TI~I'FI""""""~ )...~~=--t --:,)7 -=--- /;)(). (/"\ /
I II I .....\ I ~··..:"fØ'", L. I 0 r í ~// ...... '01.... ,-
/ \ J I ........... I --~r-·.z~~~I... I \ ////~, //~// \ ~.
/ ---- I ... . -..:!.... '---- -c· /// <;) )- / , - ~
.: --.... v ' /
(I~.,f > - -- /' f Q;) "" ^' '\. /' / /'
I. ___ ~--L__~__,-L -~-- .L /
'It! ... - '-- ,,/
... , . o? - / ~ / / ;-
. . I'" .0'" ->- ...... /
... .. '7 /- .~
I ~~ ..:/~!~ I I 1.1 I I I I..····· I ((,-=--"':: :.oJ A- ~ ~/ ,.'
I II ..··f I ! ,~/>~/2 ,~ ~
~,~ I I :.~ I II I I I II I I: I. ~f ~~~ ~~,. ~.r0 ~;~ ~~
> '---"- - -. - - -.,-- - -,--.!....--.J 'l )//. ~
II! ,~ I :. /'1- ¡Y 1 (
'> I~ J. .., ,0/' '-" (C.. )(& .ç.
ç I'" .. I I I . ^ .."
. s·· I I ,'" ¿/
~ I;· . ,. I > "LC:.Œ.:' ';(,
'< ¡!II .-' .," I .... \.' C '
\ ..... .,' .,' __ - ~__..--"~\'.... _ø
_. _ __ ~_ _ ~ ~ ~ ~_____ .__~,__,.._,__uuuu. -',
i ... L::> ....--~:------~~
I .t : ,
I I - '0". ,oJ',. ....-.....
I ...q.() ~
ì ,,---1.: : ...: ,..------
( . <Þ--~... ~ ~ ~.~ ~_~~3~"'-3~· (2.&O'~.~~2" _--->...; \ -- - --~"~..-:::-.-:-.--
I A~C.-S$ ex ,___ -- -- ---.;:. ~·······6
. {)r"'~ . ". '"
i C.L ~E.D "" "" "" ¡ '" "'" "'" ~ .t.. "" ~ "'"
~ _ ~~~~_L~··~~~~ /> ~~;:¡-
N.Z."·~~''':;''-Æ.- It:!Jð.B7'--
- --
- -.-.-
----- -
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
(
\
\
...
\'
un,
p9
~o
,0
~
CRESTAR BANK BRANCH
PLAN: Special Use Permit Application
DRIVE-BY WINDOW MODIFICATION
January 30, 1995
~-<.
'-
lj. s. ,eOll T£ 2 ~ (N. 8. ~ ,)
---------
.------
e
e
e
. ''''...
I ATTACHMENT C I
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596
(804) 296-5875 FAX (804) 9724060
TOD (804) 972-4012
March 7, 1995
Stephen Weisensale, AlA
Architects Dayton, Thompson & Associates
3111 Northside Ave.
Richmond VA 23228
Re:
Crestar Bank, Albemarle Square ARB-P(SDP)-95-03
Tax Map 61 Parcel 123A
Dear Mr. Weisensale:
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on
Monday, March 6, 1995. The board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the special permit
with the following revisions:
1) Place any lighting proposed under the facia of the canopy, with the ceiling lighting recessed.
2) Place lane indicator lights on the canopy in an area that will not be visible from Route 29N.
, 3) Place two medium street trees in the recontigured island area.
4) Place appropriate vegetation in areas along the perimeter of the site between the parking and
the retaining wall. This may be small street trees or shrubs where appropriate.
If the special use permit requires a certificate of appropriateness, the ARB has granted staff
administrative approval of the plan and building permit.
If you have questions concerning any of the above please call me.
Sincerely,
liO¥~+j--
Marcia\J~
Design Planner
cc:
B. Tamaddon
Ron Lilley
10 C'ìmHC! Y.:J'L..'fi'>iI
. . q5'DLll~8ß
.~._." .~.."~'_ 'W_' _.~__
{n
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
<-....^-~.~ -...
March 29, 1995
Centel Cellular Company of Charlottesville
c/o M. E. Gibson, Jr
Tremblay & Smith
P. O. Box 1585
Charlottesville, VA 22902
RE: SP-95-04 Centel Cellular Company of Charlottesville
Dear Mr. Gibson:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March 28, 1995, by a vote of
4-1, recommended denial of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and
receive public comment at their meeting on Aori119. 1995. Any new or additional information
regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least
seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date,
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
v,£- ~
William D. Fritz
Senior Planner
WDF/jCj
cc: ~ Carey
Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins
e
e
e
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
WILLIAM D. FRITZ
MARCH 28, 1995
APRIL 19, 1995
SP-95-04 CENTEL CELLULAR COMPANY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is proposing to locate a cellular tower and support
facilities at the Ivy Landfill as shown on attachment C, This tower will provide increased
coverage in the western portion of the County and along the 1-64 corridor. This site will provide
coverage for areas which are not currently adequately covered and will not be covered by the
recently approved Camp Holiday Trails site.
Petition: Petition to construct a communication tower/antennas and support buildings on 302
acres zoned RA, Rural Areas and EC, Entrance Corridor Overlay District [10.2.2(6)]. Property,
described as Tax Map 73, Parcel 28, is the Ivy Landfill. This site is located in the Samuel Miller
Magisterial District and is not located within a designated growth area (Rural Area 3),
Character of the Area: This tower is proposed to be located at the Ivy Landfill near the
asbestos disposal area, The site for the proposed tower is clear, however an access road will need
to be constructed from the internal landfill road network. The tower is proposed approximately
120 feet from Route 637.
Recommendation:
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the
Zoning Ordinance and recommends approval.
Plannine and Zonina: History:
This site has been approved for use as a landfill no other history is available.
Comprehensive Plan:
A stated design standard of the Comprehensive Plan is "design public utility corridors to fit the
topography. Corridors should be shared by utilities when possible. Distribution lines should be
placed underground." The intent of this statement is to consolidate locations. No other towers
are currently located on this site. Therefore, this request is not consistent with past efforts to
locate new towers in existing "tower fanns". The travelling public is one of the main users of
cellular telephones. Therefore, this request may be considered as serving the Rt. 64 corridor.
1
e
e
e
Other cellular towers have been approved and serve the Rt. 64 corridor (as well as other sections
of the County). However, the opportunity to cluster cellular telephones to serve large areas and
long lengths of corridors is limited by both technology and topography. Area to locate other
towers on this site is available, but would require tree removal. Staffhas included in this report
discussion on the nature of cellular telephone technology,
STAFF COMMENT:
Staff will address the issues of this request in three sections:
1. Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. Section 4.10.3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Characteristics of Cellular Telephone Technology.
Section 31.2..4.1 of the Zonin{! Ordinance
Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the ri~ht to issue all $,pecial use
pennits pennitted hereunder. Special use pennits for uses as provided in this ordinance
may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of
substantial detriment to adiacent property.
The nearest dwelling to the proposed tower site is located approximately 550 feet distant. This
. tower is proposed to be located approximately 500 feet from the nearest adjacent Rural Area
property line, The tower will be visible from the adjacent dwelling. The tower is proposed to be
located approximately 120 feet from the edge of the
right-of-way for Rt. 637. The proposed tower will slightly be visible from 1-64. (The equipment
building will not be visible,) Lighting of the tower is unlikely due to the fact that the tower is
under 200 feet in height. Should this special use pennit be approved, staff has recommended as a
condition no lighting except as required by the F .A.A. or other federal agencies.
Staff opinion is that the proposed tower will not limit use of any adjacent private property or be
of substantial detriment to those properties. As to the effect on Rt. 637 right-of-way, another
adjacent property, please see Section 4,10.3,1 discussion later in this report.
that the character of the district will not be changed thereby.
This tower will be a stand alone facility, This will result in a change in the appearance of the
area. Towers have been pennitted in the Rural Areas and have not in the opinion of staff resulted
2
"
e
in a change in the character of the Rural Areas to this point. Staff opinion is that this tower will
not change the character of the Rural Areas district due to limited traffic volume, no road
construction, no new utility corridors (electric, phone, etc.), and no impact on use of this or other
property for any by-right uses including agricultural/forestal use, Staff does recognize this
introduces a new tower to a location at which no towers exist. Multiple stand alone tower
locations could ultimately have the cumulative effect of changing the character of the Rural
Areas District. The ARB has reviewed this request and recommended conditions should this
permit be approved,
and that such use will be in harmony with the pw:pose and intent of this ordinance.
Staff has reviewed the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as stated in Sections 1.4, 1.5
and 1,6 with particular reference to Sections 1.4" 1.4.4, and 1.5 (Attachment D). All of these
provisions address, in one form or another, the provision of public services. The use of cellular
telephones clearly provides a public service as evidenced by the expanded and rapid increase in
use. Sprint Cellular is a public utility as identified by the State. Based on the provision of a
public service, staff opinion is that this request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the
ordinance.
with the uses permitted by ril:ht in the district.
This site is used for a landfill. The proposed tower will not affect the current uses, other by-right
e uses available on this site or by-right uses on any other property.
with additional re~ulations provided in Section 5.0 ofthis ordinance.
Section 5.1,12 of the ordinance contains regulations governing tower facilities and appropriate
conditions are proposed to ensure compliance with this provtsion of the ordinance,
and with the public health. safety and I:eneral welfare.
The provision of increased communication facilities may be considered consistent with the
public health and safety and general welfare by providing increased communication services in
the event of emergencies and increasing overall general communication services,
Section 4.10.3.1 of the Zonin~ Ordinance
Section 4.10.3,1 states:
e
The height limitations of this chapter shall not apply to bams, silos, farm buildings,
agricultural museums designed to appear as traditional farm buildings, residential
chimneys, spires, flag poles, monuments or transmission towers and cables,; smokestack,
water tank, radio or television antenna or tower, provided that except as otherwise
3
e
permitted by the commission in a specific case, no structure shall be located closer in
distance to any lot line than the height of the structure; and, provided further that such
structure shall not exceed one hundred (100) feet in height in a residential district. This
height limitation shall not apply to any of the above designated structures now or
hereafter located on existing public utility easements.
By the requirements of this provision the proposed tower would need to.be located a minimum of
180 feet from the edge of the property. The proposed tower is located approximately 120 feet
from the edge of the right-of-way. This location was determined by the topography of the area.
Staff opinion is that this provision is designed to prevent undue crowding of the land and to
prevent safety hazards should a tower fall. The Virginia Department of Transportation was
contacted regarding this request and has stated no opposition as the tower is located beyond the
edge of the right-of-way and even in the event of total failure would not impact the travel lanes
of Rt. 637 due to the elevation difference between the two uses and the conditions recommended
by staff. Historically, towers reviewed by the County are approved subject to a condition
requiring approval of a tower designed to collapse in the lease area in the event of structural
failure (such a condition is proposed by staff for this request). This condition protects the public
safety. Relocation of the tower is an option, however, this may result in a taller tower. Staff is
able to support this request should the special use permit be approved.
Characteristics of Cellular Telephone Technolo~y
e
The Board has previously requested staff research future tower needs in the County as related to
communication trends or technology. Although staff is still researching technology and demand,
staff can provide the following information regarding cellular technology. The technology of
cellular phones results in a demand for tower locations unlike the demands of other users of the
airwaves, The public has general familiarity with commercial broadcast on A.M., F ,M, and
Television, including wireless cable. A.M. stations generally require a cluster of towers in low
locations. This is due to the fact that this type of broadcast relies on ground modulation for the·
transmission of the signal. F.M. and television, including wireless cable broadcast utilize single
towers for broadcast. Towers for this type of use are generally found at the highest available
location. These broadcast are generally only receivable in a line of sight with the tower.
However, with the use oflarge wattage for the transmission (in this area up to 5,000,000 watts)
small obstructions will not block the signal. This characteristic allows a single broadcast
location to serve a broad area.
All of the commercial broadcasts listed above are received in a single direction, That is, the
broadcast is made from the tower and received by the individual with no return of information.
Cellular use differs from standard commercial broadcasts in several ways which results in a
different demand for tower locations,
e
4
e
e
e
Cellular broadcast rely on line of sight for the transmission and reception of signals, This results
in the need to locate towers at higher elevations, The broadcast power at the cellular tower is
limited to 100 watts, effective radiating power. At this low power small obstructions, including
but not limited to foliage, can block signals. Even if the transmission power could be increased,
(the signal strength is limited by the F,C.C.), transmission range is limited by the power of the
hand held or car phone unit. The power of the personal units ranges from approximately 0,6 to 3
watts. This low power limits the broadcast range and increases the potential of obstruction of the
signal from small obstructions. Alone these two transmission power limitations result in the
need for multiple tower locations.
Another factor resulting in increased demand for tower locations is the limitation on the number
of calls which can be processed at each tower location at a given time. Currently, one cellular
provider has indicated that on one given hour, peak hour, up to 4,000 blocked calls were
recorded. These blocked calls are due in part to the limitation on the handling capacity of the
existing cellular towers. Increases in technology may enable each tower location to
accommodate more calls at on time. However, the limiting factor will be and is the number of
channels available for cellular telephone use. Using multiple towers effectively increases the
number of available channels in the system. This is due to "handing off' of calls which occurs
automatically within the cellular system. That is, when an individual places a call, the nearest
tower receives that call and utilizes a channel to complete the call. (As an individual moves
away from the original tower another tower takes over the call.) The fewer number of towers
within the system the fewer number of calls which can be handled. As the system matures the
coverage area for each tower is reduced due to the placement of new towers. These new towers,
by virtue of their reduced coverage area may be constructed at lower elevations.
Cellular use requires uninterrupted service, particularly for data transmission, such as faxes and
computer connections. This sets a high standard ofreliabili,ty and quality. Technology to reduce
the need for multiple towers, such as satellite technology, currently is unavailable~ The use of
monopole, guyed or free standing lattice towers is possible, The use of existing structures for the
provision of cellular coverage is preferred by the County and the service providers, due to
reduced cost. However, as has been stated previously the nature of cellular communication is
such that limited opportunities to use existing structures exists,
SUMMARY:
The hilly to mountainous terrain of Albemarle County, which results in "dead spots" in a cellular
system, has resulted in a number of requests for cellular towers. This tower request is due to
both terrain and a need to increase the capacity of the cellular system to accommodate the
increased usage of cellular technology. This request is not located within a "tower farm" as is
encouraged by the County. No existing structures were found that could provide the needed
coverage. The applicant has been working with emergency service providers to accommodate
their needs. This tower is located along an existing highway corridor and serves, in part, the
users of that corridor, Due to the character of cellular technology, additional stand alone towers
are likely.
5
e
e
e
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff opinion is that this request is generally consistent with Section 31.2.4.1 of the ordinance
and with past actions involving communication towers. This tower is located in a Rural Area,
However, the use of this site for a landfill is unlike other Rural Area Uses. Due to existing
activities on site additional negative impacts on adjacent properties should not occur, Staff is
able to support this request based on the analysis of Section 31.2.4,1 subject to conditions. Staff
also supports the request for modification of Section 4.10,3.1 subject to the special use pennit
conditions.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Tower height shall not exceed 200 feet;
2. Compliance with Section 5.1,12 of the Zoning Ordinance;
3 ,There shall be no lighting of the tower unless required by a federal agency, All tower
lighting shall be shielded so as to minimize visibility from the ground;
4.
Staff approval of additional antennae installation. No administrative approval shall
constitute or imply support for or approval of, the location of additional towers, antennae,
etc., even if they may be part of the same network or system as any antennae
administratively approved under this section;
5. The tower must be designed and adequate separation provided to property lines such that
in the event of structural failure, the tower and components will remain within the lease
area;
6, Tower shall be located within lease area shown on Attachment C,
--------------------------
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Location Map
B - Tax map
C - Sketch Plan
D - Tower Plan
E - Applicant's Infonnation
F - ARB Action Letter
G - Sections 1.4, 1.5 & 1.6
H - BZA Action Letter
I:\GENERAL\SHARE\JANICE\SP9404.RPT
6
+-
(,
o
~
þ..~~ /
ç' , LITTLE
~\
1 (
1~1
('
.AT
ATl'ACHMENT
A
MTN
.: 800""5"11111 'u.....-
IR~O '-
.' , L,. Ie K MOUN¡T ~~~
/- .""7""- ~ 240 _
~;- , 0" "
~ ~
..
-'
~
o
i::
~
(~
,A~
f
II
(--1/
/,('ll
/J:
r-\ t
i J ~
/
GIBSON
MOUNT AIN
Cj:::7"
FOX MOUNT AIN
[@.-
'.'
<) '.~ ~:~--,<. .~'
,.,<,
*¡
ð
~,
w
<.I
Z
'"
LL
{,''-;'
tí
'~
-~'~-
[6nT
\
,€;
is
2:,
'"
'"
'12
" I
G'i'o
11-"
0"
t
~
d
o
~
~
~
)
f/)
~;_/
~
~,A
'~'1-
f'
MOUNT AIN
(
~\.IIO'"
e-i-S
11°
C."8fMln
FT
,
"~~
\
~\
I
~
~
$~/
("701 l"'''' ,. ..~ ~~
/.4, Jv I
(t:' J
",;
--------~ &D ,..
~ ,; / !Im 7~' ;
CASTLE ROCK
Heards Mt" r: T
/ '~.... ,.. -! 2. --....
.<;
ALBEMARLE
COUNT)
57
ATI'ACHMENT B
27G
21
~~ /
~.----. \
26 Z~-\
SP-95-04
Centel Cellular
~ II \
"-'/I ..
·f
~
'.
~~
.~'
"·9
".
..
'\.
, .
'-
~".
~\
~.
..
~
""
\ 43
~
"
~
l .
, ,~.-
1 . ......-..~~ .
22 ·"'r..":/'. .~.. '.
.J.:-..i~" X \\
---.... ': '.
23 J.=.;... \, / .
/.... ~< ( ..\ 2:1
/.. ... .'
. ~t.~
... 24 \/ '\': '.~
(. \
.
87
SCALE IN FEET
... KAltDW""E .'''CUl TURAL a 'O"£STÞ.L DISTRICT
SAMUEL MILLER AND WHITE HALL
DISTRICTS
SECTION
73
---------------
e
e
e
a
IKJDS seT A r AU. LCAS£ AReA CORNeRS.
CN TIRC LCASiC ARCA TO Ø{ Q.£ARCD.
GRADEO AND ORA ~LCD
'IIOOOS"
......
HÐGHI
H2.).,.
VICINITY MAP
r-
(OΠOF
IIVOOS%
PROPOSED CHAiN-LINK f£NCE
0." IN$JDC LCASC AReA
t
I
//
/// ~ -. -. -
~~::~~~~- .
_ ----:.- -:ì. ..~¡ PIIOP<JSCO
\f \õ. ..." PRCJPOS(J) ,.'. ,,'
. . . \.... PROPOSED 20' ACceSS fQUlPtICN r BWG.
cAseMmT
PROPOSEO 12' GRA IÆ1
ACceSS ROAD
'""",
LEASE AREA DETAIL
1"= 30'
(L£ASE AREA -
PROPOSED Ii OF TOWf:R DA TA
TOWf:R HflCHT - 'BO'~ MONOPOLE
LATITUDE - 18TJI'22B' (NAO BJ)
LONG/TUOE - 7B'18·57J· (NAD BJ)
GROOND HEVA TlON - 672.40' (NA va 88)
"""'I/RC.
~'41'2r II
fO.,,'2r If
""J,.,r II
JØ.......,. ..
O«JRO OtSf.
U~2'
'01172'
tR'.'
.. 77'
1
}/¡
1,il
~~
~~
1 SETE
PROPOSED 20' ACCESS EASE MEN
(ALONe ex. PA I£D ROAD)
RLE COON TY. !ARC/NIA:
Tf 6J7 AND ROOTf 704·
'¡E OF SAID ROO Tf 6J7
NT A T THE CENTfRLlNE
PAIÆ"D ENTRANCE ROAD
WG SAID RIGHT OF WA Y
N J7"49'JO' W. 40.77;
RADIUS OF 'JO.OO', A
"IVY SANITA nON LANDFILL' THENCE N 7'57'59" It;
N J2'57"49' W. 95.54',
·20" E, 7B. 45; THENCE
S" E, 48.05', THENCE
ED ROAD S 49:1J'JJ" E,
TII A RAOIUS OF 85.00:
;J2.71; THENCE ALONG
. 200.00: A L£NGTII OF
IT AT THE ENO OF SAID
OF A SPRIN T CELLULAR
2520'J7" f. ".00' TO
(P.O.B.) OF SAIO SPRINT
SE LINE N 2520'J7" It;
60. DO' TO A SET ROO,
THENCE S 64 :19'2J" W.
TAX /lAP /7J-28 AND
IRI.£ AND THE Ct TY OF
9 ACRE (J,ooo SOoFT.),
- (40,19J SO.H)
RECEIVED
lIAR 1 0 1995
Ple.nn!ng Dept.
,"- 2DOO'
w
Il.
«
j U
i ~ ~
'" '" z
':J :3
...
o
'" .,.,
"'Nt
~"'~
~i· 111
8",1j¡ Q:
U:5 !Z!
~~~ ~
Z!~ if
-u-'
;::-
.
I:!
...
o
DAlt
3-02-95
ORA Y
W.t.A.N.
DESIGNED BY
CHECKED BY
ft./)
SCAlE
1·· 100'
<
~Z
~ E-4G
o Þ-t D:
~ m>
g¡ >'
111 Q~
;:J
~o Z
~u
* ~~ <
~~ ~
O~ ~
~ O~
~ ~.
I m¡... µ.':1
u ~U
~ æ ~
I~ ~
is[/)
E-4D:
* Z~
.....::¡
~~
~~
ffi (J)~
!Z! UJ
i3
z
.....
SHEET NO.
1 OF 1
JOB NO.
9502-10
e
1.4.4
e
1.5
e
r-
~
-.
ATl'ACHMENT D
-
PURPOSE AND INTENT
-.-I
This ordinance, insofar as is practicable, is intended to be in accord
with and to implement the Comprehensive Plan of Albemarle County
adopted pursuant to the provisions of Title 15.1, Chapter 11, Article
4, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and has the purposes and intent
set fo~th in Title 15,1, Chapter 11, Article 8.
As set forth in section 15.1-427 of the Code, this ordinance is
intended to improve public health, safety, convenience and welfare of
citizens of Albemarle County, Virginia, and to plan for the future
development of communities to the end that transportation systems be
carefully planned; that new community centers be developed with
adequate highway, utility, health, educational and recreational
facilities; that the needs of agriculture, industry and business be·
recognized in future growth; that residential areas be provided wi th
healthy surroundings for family life; that agricultural and forestal
land be preserved; and that the growth of the community be consonant
with the efficient and economical use of public funds. (Added 9-9-92)
Therefore be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors' of Albemarle
County, Virginia, for the purposes of promoting the health, safety,
convenience and general welfare of the public and of planning for the
future development of the community, that the zoning ordinance of
Albemarle County, together with the official zoning map adopted by
reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance, is designed:
To facilitate the provision of adequate police and fire protection,
disaster evacuation , civil defense, transportation, water, sewerage,
flood protection, schools, parks, forests, playgrounds,. recre~tional
facilities, airports and other public requirements;
RELATION TO ENVIRONMENT
This ordinance is designed to treat lands which are similarly situated
and environmentally similar in like manner with reasonable considera-
tion for the existing use and character of properties, the Comprehen-
sive Plan, the suitability of property for various uses, the trends of
growth or change, the current and future land and water requirements
of the community for various purposes as debermined by- population and
economic studies and other studies, the transportation requirements of
the community, and the requirements for airports, housing, schools,
parks, playgrounds, recreation areas and other public services; for
the conservation of natural resources; and preservation of flood
plains, the preservation of agricultural and forestal land, the con-
servation of properties and their values and the encouragement of the
most appropriate use of land throughout the county. (Amended 11-1-89)
M.E. Gibson
Tremblay & Smith Law Oftìces
P.O. Box 1585
Charlottesville, V A 22902
~II
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Department of Zoning
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5875 FAX (804) 9724060
TOD (804) 972-4012
RECEIVED
MR 2~11995
Planning Dept.
March 21, 1995
Re: ARB-P(SDP)-95-04 Sprint Cellular Co.
Tower - BIoomtield Ivy Landtill Site
Tax Map 73, Parcel 28
Dear Mr. Gibson:
The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on
Monday:March 20, 1995. The ARB voted unanimously (3:0) to offer no objection to the special use
permit request for a communication tower if the following conditions were met:
1) The monopole is not lit.
2) The pole is painted a tlat rust or brown color.
3) Limit the dishes on the pole to two (2).
If the County· Attorney determines that the zoning ordinance allows for the procedure, the ARB has
granted staff administrative approval of the plan once the conditions have been met.
If you have questions concerning any of the above, please call me.
s~nce1eIY, .\
lL&u- ~-----
Marcia Josep'U
Design Planner .
cc: J.K. Timmons & Associates
Rivanna Solid Waste Authority
,0 4 Ll:L1~
.'. I.. I'k·Dl/I'l·~
¡'''''V .~ ;"). 7~~_...___",~__,__<_..__
/>,;:'(;:1(,.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
MAw ,¡ iQ(\r'
i ò;,) klVi}
iD OF SlY;,c,,! .
~,...,-- - ~~~:.:~,:....
March 29, 1995
Antony Champ
Rt. 2, Box 344D
Crozet, VA 22932
RE: SP-95-05 Antony Champ
Dear Mr. Champ:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March 28, 1995, unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and
receive public comment at their meeting on Anrill9. 1995. Any new or additional information
regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least
seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date,
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me,
;~ø
William D. Fritz
Senior Planner
WDF/jc .
cc: EJcarey
Jo Higgins
Amelia McCulley
, ,
e
e
e
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
WILLIAM D~ FRITZ
MARCH 28, 1995
APRIL 19, 1995
SP 95-05 ANTONY E. CHAMP
Applicant's Proposal: The applicant proposes to construct additional building area on top of
the existing winery. The proposed area which would be used for taSting is located on the first
floor (above the existing winery which is built below grade) and is approximately 50 X 60 feet
(3,000 square feet), including elevator, stairs, office area and restroom facilities. The area open
to the public appears to be approximately is approximately 50 X 34 feet (1700 square feet).
Additional areas shown on the plan are used for wine production or are not open to the public
except for tours. By right tasting areas of 600 square feet are permitted.
Petition: Antony Champ petitions the Board of Supervisors to allow more than 600 square feet
for on-premise sale and/or consumption of wine [5.1.25(e)]. Property, described as Tax Map 26,
Parcel 52, is located on the west side ofRt. 674 approximately 800 feet south ofRt. 673 in the
White Hall Magisterial District. This site is not located in a designated growth area (Rural Area
1).
Character of the Area: This site is planted with several acres of grapes. A portion of the
proposed winery has been constructed and wine is produced on site. Adjacent properties are a
mix of open and forest land with scattered residential units.
The winery produces wine from locally grown products and only wines produced by the winery
will be available.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 and 5.1.25
of the Zoning Ordinance and recommends approval.
Plannin~ and Zoninl: History:
The plan for the existing winery was approved by staff in 1994.
Comprehensive Plan:
The proposed activity is located in a Rural Area as identified by the Comprehensive Plan. The
1
e
e
e
general intent of the rural areas is identified on page 203 of the Plan. The first element of all
reviews in the Rural Area is "preservation of agricultural and forestal activities". The proposed
request is intended to provide support to the winery which is an agricultural operation. Wineries
and Wayside stands are permitted by right in the RA district in recognition of their agricultural
nature. This request is solely for a larger area for tasting of wine. This does not result in a larger
building or new building as the tasting area will be constructed on top of the existing winery.
STAFF COMMENT:
Staff will address each provision of Section 31,2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the ri~ht to issue all special use
permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance
may be issued u¡Jon a findin~ by the Board of SU¡Jervisors that such use will not be of
substantial detriment to adiacent property.
The winery is located central to the property. The entrance to the winery exists and no
improvements are proposed. The use is not visible from adjacent sites and no impact on adjacent
properties is expected.
that the character of the district will not be chan~ed thereby.
This site is located in an Agricultural Forestal District. The Agricultural Forestal Advisory
Committee stated no opposition to this request. This use is an agricultural activity and is
consistent with the character of the district.
and that such use will be in harmony with the put:,pose and intent of this ordinance.
This use is an agricultural activity which is consistent with the intent of the Rural Area District.
with the uses permitted by -ri~ht in the district.
This use will not affect permitted uses on this or adjacent property,
with additional re~ulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance.
This petition has been filed to allow additional area to be used for tasting. Section 5.1.25
establishes the regulations for wineries. With the exception of the area devoted to tasting this
request complies with the provisions of Section 5,1.25,
and with the public health. safety and ~eneral welfare.
2
e
Access to this site is from Route 674 which is a non-tolerable gravel road. This request will
result in more vehicle trips on Rt. 674. Staff is unable to calculate the expected trip generation
for a winery and is unable to state that an increase in the area for tasting would result in an
increase in trips over what would be pennitted by-right. An entrance meeting minimum
commercial entrance standards has been constructed to serve the existing winery, The
Department of Transportation has stated, "The activity proposed should not greatly impact the
roadway, however Route 674 currently exists as alO' -12' gravel roadway classified as
non-tolerable." Staff opinion based on the comments of the Department of Transportation and
staff visits to the site is that the public health, safety and welfare will not be adversely impacted
by this use.
SUMMARY:
Staff opinion is that the proposed activity is supportive of past County efforts to encourage
agricultural use of the Rural Areas. The use of an area larger than pennitted by right is due
largely to the character of the use which requires counter space/serving and tasting areas, The
design of the tasting area also provides the visitor with an opportunity to become educated in the
wine making process.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff has not identified any negative factors to this request and is able to recommend approval of
e this request subject to the following condition:
RECOMMENDED CONDITION OF APPROVAL:
1. Tasting area shall be limited to the area identified as visitors' lounge on plans titled
"Winery Building for White Hall Vineyards" and initialled WDF 3/15/95. The pennitted
area may be expanded by 50 square feet to accommodate revisions to the plan.
----------------
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Location Map
B - Tax Map
C - Plan of Winery
I:\GENERAL\SHARE\JANICE\SP955.RPT
e
3
..
j!
~
e
ATTACHMENT A
..I..
-<..
~
.,)
o
v
(J
................~.
, ",/,)~~I~:
..
I¡
~
~
~'t-
~~
~'
c..
o ç>þ..~'1-
~
~
t\t
)
/
1-1
~
c
LITTLE
FLAT
MTN
o
/'",
C~I 'L~
(1 ('
~
, I
).,-\
~
( J ~
) I
if
)2
(/ ;
..,
,~...~
-~..-
,10
ú
(
~J
r-7
"
ti
;z
'"
...
MOUNT þ.\N
~\.'i\O""
~...
,,~
.'
I
I
I
I
. Chortotluville
I Rese'¥Otr
I
..
Ia
ALBEMARLE
CO ,- ATTACHMENT B
25
14
51: [ 27-1
5£_ .
SP-95-05 Anthony E. Champ
55
56
13
DI$T"" T
SCALE IN F£.T WHITE HALL DISTRICT SECTION 26
..
..
ATTACHMENT C
;.
.<.
~
..
,
~
'1\
,
Ii
N
I
I
í
I
I
I
!
\..
,¡:
, ~
"
"'
..~
il
'"
...
'"
~
~I
~I
,
I
I
<---
it
;
I.
:I··I~
, :;
I :.
I
*f .
It
17
1"1
II.'. I
i Ii I
~ , I
ii,
i
I
';'
,.
'ÒI:
~
t
ti
...
...
~,,>-;.:i f'~..,..,
,. (
H
H
r
JJ
/- ..ç::::::¡.. ï::=:J;.,¡::=:J- t=J-.
- ._._ __ - - n__ _._ _ _ _ __
ryC'-:
-r
);t;I'''~
).::.:..¡. ~~:
," >', ~
..,
~
I
"
'"
'~~~:
¡.,.. '
,. ~ - .
I
¡~
¡
!"
r-·
ì
t
1
~~
"
, ,
Ï>
..r
./
.-'
...
,.
¡or
/ .....
..." .
. '.
~';it
"
".
------
/'
/
I:l;::'___.
M.
... ",.
."'20........
::¡ -
J:;
!...,.....
c',..,····
, .': ~ "
~ -
- -~ ~~-:!---:::~
---- - - - -
~g. -
. ~-
,. ::;."'- -::- E-f'v' E."'" T F"-
---..
,~ I ?";Þ..¡.".¡': 'IS' "
!>I?'
I
-+--+-
.-
~
\VA~&ri .....~'~E.
"'--
-
I
-~+-t
_L ~ ~
" -r-......,
~
'~.
¡lor
3/1(1'15
-.
¡-.<--;
, ---../
c. ,.
~X_BUll.DING.~.·:;:
. <:,:,rc;,..:.. ....:,....:.:.. -,
WHITÈRAi.L YINriARD$'_:
DR': .t.MRs~~NY·~··
ROtm!f/14
~^LL, VIR~
- -
... "'" - - __ II> _"
DRAWN
.:...:"'c:.:>íR.J......'fIPN
~o+-:.
Li?e:.
( ,
l
"
I¡'¡ '),:1,,10. Y.:LL/.3~,
I\g;:~:.: item Nv ~:O!:LLq~3~1
..=~..~ W ~ ':
"·1 ,3 ~ ~ L".~.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE './ ~~..~.-.'''-
Dept of Planning & Community Developrent Ulft 3 ~
401 Mcintire Road . \ i., """
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 L..-,---- ________
(804) 296-5823
;:;no;::
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning & Community Development dNU
March 22, 1995
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
CPA-95-2 Milton Airport Area "B" Study
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March 21, 1995, unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted comprehensive plan amendment. Attached please
find a staff report which outlines this amendment. The Board of Supervisors is scheduled to
review this amendment at their April 19, 1995 meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
VWC/jcw
A IT ACHMENT
,
\
,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albemarle County Planning Commission
FROM:
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning & Community Development\
DATE:
March 14, 1995
..i I
SUBJECT:
Milton Airport Area "B" Study
The Milton Airj)ort Area "B" Study was undertaken as one of eight (8) neighborhood studies as
part of the three-party planning agreement between Albemarle County, the City of
Charlottesville and the University of Virginia. The Study was completed under the guidance of
the Milton Airport Advisory Committee and approved by the Planning and Coordination Council
(P ACC) on May 26, 1994.. The Study was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a January
31, 1995 worksession at which time the Commission directed it be advertised for public hearing,
This hearing is set for Tuesday, March 21, 1995,
Please refer to the prior package for the Study's information and recommendations. The only
more recent information regarding this area is archeological and historic resource surveying that
has and is occurring. It is recommended that this be recognized in any action to approve this
study. Staff recommends the following:
Amend the Comprehensive Plan to include the following statement:
Consider the recommendations of the City/CountylUniversity Planning and Coordination
Council's Milton Airport Area "B" Study as a guide for future planning of the Milton
area. Consideration should also be given to the resultslrecommendations of the Milton
historic/archaeological village survey and historic context report, currently underway.
(Note: In the current Plan, previous Area "B" studies have been discussed under the
appropriate Growth Area section. Because Milton is located in the Rural Area, the above
statement will appear in Chapter Three, The Developed Environment, at the end of the
Rural Development section, under "Other Issues." In the proposed revision to the Plan, it
is anticipated that the discussions of all the Area "B" studies will be included in the
common Introduction section.)
I:\GENERAL\SHARE\CILIMB\MIL TON .MEM
r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albemarle County Planni?~ Commission
FROM: V. Wayne Cilimberg U~
DATE: January 24, 1995
SUBJECT: Milton Airport Area "B" Study
The Milton Air:port Area "B" Study was undertaken as one of eight (8) neighborhood studies as
part of the three-party planning agreement between Albemarle County, the City of
Charlottesville and the University of Virginia. The Study was completed under the guidance of
the Milton Airport Advisory Committee and approved by the Planning and Coordination Council
(PAC C) on May 26, 1995. Enclosed you will find the study, minutes from both the PACC
Technical Committee and the PACC meetings, and a letter from the University reporting its
action on the study,
Staff had originally intended to review the study with the Planning Commission as part of the
overall land use plan discussion in the Comprehensive Plan review. However, events at the State
level regarding possible surplussing of this state owned property prompted staff to bring this to
. you for a January 31 worksession. Tom Leback will be available to discuss that status with you
at the worksession.
I:\GENERAL\SHARE\CILIMB\MIL TON .MEM
/
~
PH.t- -r~- ~~, 1~
DISCUSSION:
It was noted that the Visioning Statement must be adopted by PACC Policy, The
Planning Commission/Board of Supervisors as well as City Council may do so as
well.
Mr. Cilimberg noted the process for adoption of the neighborhood studies has
been that the study was received by PACC Policy and they distributed to the
three parties for their adoption, He noted the possibility of
changes/addendum to the statement once public hearings are conducted.
Mrs. Huckle asked "what power" does the visioning statement have?
Mr. Cilimberg explained that this is a common point from which the
City/CountyjUniversity will be working on their Comprehensive Plans.
Mr. Huff noted that the Board of Supervisors will want the opportunity for
input. He also noted that this Visioning Statement is not a staff
recommendation, but is a recording of citizens input.
Mr. Levine noted that the selected comments are supportive of the Visioning
Statement and its intent is to be used as a guide for future planning.
Vote: Unanimous to recommend the Visioning Statement on to PACC Policy.
MlJltØI:¡¡¡¡gg:{I:::::¡IHPI;:¡¡¡:¡i::::~:m~I!~:::~~IP::::::gÇ9mm~pÄ:1tt911
Mr. Cilimberg noted the location of this study area (on the east side of Rt,
729 approximately 1,3 miles south of the intersection of U.S, 250 and Rt, 729
in Shadwell). He noted that currently the area is being used for storage
facilities by the University as well as a tree nursery farm, firing range for
police and a model airplane club. He noted the following areas of concern:
(1) additional traffic; and, (2) the question as to need for additional
recreational area.
Mr, Cilimberg highlighted the recommendations (outlined on pages 9 and 10) of
the Study:
A. Continue to maintain current uses on site.
B. Retain the existing vegetative buffer along Milton R~ad between
the site and residential property.
C, Review site for potential passive recreational uses.
D. Review site for other potential recreational uses.
Mr. Levine noted that there was citizen concern about the development of the
property as a public park.
Mr, Cilimberg stated that the Birdwood and Faulconer Area B Studies will be
addressed during review of the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 3 of 4
Kr. Levine moved that the Kilton Area B Study be recommended to PACC Policy
for adoption.
Kr. O'Connell seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, Kay 25, 1994, 3:30 P.K.,
Albemarle County Department of Planning & Community Development Conference
Room.
Page 4 of 4
~
~ V.
t>Â'-'- ~ '!> !h '4
Milton Area "B" Studv - PresentationlReconunendation
Mr. Leback gave a report on the Milton Airport site. At present, the University uses the hangars for
storage, the University Police have a fIring range there, a portion is used by a tree nursery and a local model
airplane club also has access to this property. A draft reconunendation for developing this property into a
recreational area was presented to local landowners. Based on their negative reaction to any development of this
property and their positive feelings with regard to its present use.. Mr. Sandridge felt that P ACC should approve
P ACC- TECH's reconunendation to continue the property's current use, to retain the buffer and explore the
potential for other recreational activities. Mr. Tucker made a motion to accept the study and subsequent
recommendations and Mr. Bowerman seconded. The Conunittee voted unanimously to approve.
VI. Electronic Conun\.;Ißity Networking - PresentationlDiscussion
Mr. Chip German presented a report entitled "The Monticello Area Virtual Village" as well as a slide
presentation on Electronic Community Networking. He also reported that a grant proposal totaling $266,500
has been submitted to the U.S. Department ofConunerce for federal funding. Mr. Tucker asked if the project
would be dependent on the grant funding and Mr. German reaffirmed that the project would proceed with or
without funding because other avenues were also being pursned. A discussion followed the presentation. Mr.
Tucker asked what the timetable might be and Mr. German stated that cable work should be done this summer
with basic access by early fall. Mr. German informed the Conunittee that there was a strong commitment by all
to making this available to everyone in the area through schools, libraries, etc. Since Mr. Gennan had already
received the endorsements of all three jurisdictions, no action from P ACC was necessary at this time. But, at
some point. Mr. Getman stated that he would approach PACe sometime iri the near future for help in generating
public interest in this project.
III. Community Visioning - Presentation/discussion
Mr. Huja gave a report on the process involved in developing the Conununily Visioning brochure. He
reported that two public fonuns involving approximately 400 people were held. Questions were given out,
tabulated and then discussed. A draft was then developed and refined. The final document was then presented
to P ACC with a request that this statement be incorporated into the individual jurisdictions' Comprehensive Plan.
A discussion then followed regarding whether or not each jurisdiction should take the statement back to their
Board or Council to review. Mr. Huja was concerned that, after all the work that had gon.e into developing this
statement, that there not be any changes made to this. Mr. Hendrix felt that even though changes might be made,
it should still be our common community vision. Mr. Tucker stated that even if there were changes that the
present statement would be the foundation for a "conunon vision," but that each jurisdiction would probably add
to the vision statement to complement the uniqueness of their jurisdiction. Mr. Hendrix then made a motion to
have each jurisdiction review the statement for any recommended changes and report back to PACC for adoption.
Mr. Tucker seconded and the Conunittee's vote was unanimous.
VII. Other Mattersllssues
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by Mayor Vandever at 4:05 p.m.
RWT,Jr/dbm
94.085
2
"r
~1~1- ( ~ :Ç-
~.f
/
6L: "'.
'~.... UNIVEHSITY OF
~VIRGINIA
Charlonesville, Virginia 22903 . HO..¡·924-6015 . FAX 804·924·601-
The Rotunda . East Wing .
OFFICE OF HIE ARCHITECT FOR TilE IINIVEHSITY
September 7, 1994
;;'"'ì~~··'('·~·-.'."" ..
~. õllf'~ I . Š_, 1iJ¡ ,I"~ II,
. 4<"C,,:s. .~~·~n ...j !". :1.&:....
':,. :., 1 f) I~·"ll
\ 0_' r. I, t
Mr, Tex Weaver
Infonnation Resource Planner
County of Albemarle
Department of Planning and Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
r-~II' :... ~~. ........; ..' -.. ........ .... ..
~ di II HI I: } ;~.'¡ ".,
\ .". ~:"J ,... ,....' L
RE: Milton Airport Area "B" Study
Dear Tex:
At its August 22, 1994 meeting the Building and Grounds Committee of the
University of Virginia's Board of Visitors endorsed the recommendations of
the Milton Airport Area "B" Study, They did, however, request that an
additional recommendation regarding the Monticello Viewshed and future
development be included in the Study. The Board felt it is imperative that
future development respect the Monticello Viewshed and that it not have
negative impact on that Viewshed,
As we discussed, please have this recommendation added to the study when
it is incorporated into the Co~nty's Comprehensive Plan.
Sincerely,
?» k'*,' i¿~
Tom Leback
University Landscape Architect
C:Colette Capone
Mrs. Betty Marie
b:Milton\Weaver
MIL TON AIRPORT
AREA "B" STUDY
PROPOSED BY THE MILTON
AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
April 1994
Prepared by the
Albemarle County
. Department of Planning and Community Development
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A.
B.
C.
D.
II. LAND
A.
B.
C.
D.
Background. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Geographic Location of the Study Area...........1
Purpose of the Milton Airport Area Study........2
Principle Areas of Concern......................2
USE PROFILE..................................... 2
Existing Land Use Analysis...................... 2
Zoning Analysis of the Milton Airport PropertY..3
,
Zoning Analysis of Adjacent Properties..........4
Development Potential...........................4
III. TRANSPORTATION......... ~~................... ....~........4
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS............................... 4
A. Flood Plain.....................................4
B. Scenic River Designation........................ 6
C. Water Resource Protection Area (RPA) Ordinance..6
D. Rivanna River Greenbelt Plan....................?
E. Streams and Nontidal Wetlands...................8
F. Historic Preservation...........................8
V. PUBLIC UTILITIES/COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES...9
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
APPENDIX AND MAPS.................................... .11-21
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Background
In an effort to promote cooperation in planning and
community development, the City of Charlottesville,
Albemarle County, and the University of Virginia (UVA)
established the Planning and Coordination Council (PACC) in
1986. One task of the Council is to coordinate the
development of neighborhood plans in "Area B" zones (see Map
1); lands adjacent to University owned property established
by a joint memorandum of understanding adopted by the three
jurisdictions (see Appendix A). The Milton Airport study
Area is one of eight (8) neighborhood studies to be
undertaken as part of that cooperative agreement (see
Map 2). This plan provides an agreed upon basis between the
PACC, the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, the
Charlottesville city council, and the UVA Board of Visitors
in planning for the study area.
The Milton Airport is located in a rural area of Albemarle
County along the Rivanna River. The area is characterized
by very low density residential and agricultural/forestal
uses. The Comprehensive Plan calls for the continuation of
this type of land use in the area. The airport property
contains 172.2 acres, most of which are vacant.
Approximately 3/4 of the study area is located in-the
Rivanna River flood plain. Environmental and public
facility demand concerns will be crucial in any
intensification of the current use of the property.
The Milton Airport property was purchased by the UVA Rectors
and Visitors in 1939. It was operated near the end of World
War II (early 1940s) for a UVA sponsored pilot training
program and later leased as a general aviation facility for
a short time. Portions of the property have been leased for
various agricultural uses. In recent years, a portion of
the property has been leased for a nursery and the Rivanna
Radio Control Club, Inc. has leased a portion of the
property to fly model airplanes. The property also serves
UVA as a remote storage facility and police firearms range.
B. Geographic Location of the Study Ärea
The study area is located on the east side ot Milton Road
(Route 729), approximately 1.3 miles south of the
intersection of Richmond Road (US 250) and North Milton Road
(Route 729) in Shadwell. It is bordered by the Rivanna
River to the east, Milton Road to the west, and property in
private ownership to the north and south.
1
Located to the east of the study area, across the Rivanna
River, is the Village of Rivanna, a Designated Growth Area
in Albemarle County's Comprehensive Plan. The property
bordering the Rivanna River, within the Village of Rivanna,
is part of the Glenmore subdivision. To the west of the
study area, across Milton Road, is the Milton Hills
subdivision.
C. Purpose of the Milton Airport Area study
The overall purpose of the study has been stated as follows:
1. To assess the current study area conditions/trends
and the potential for change.
2. To analyze and present specific issues of concern
in the study area.
3. To assist the Planning and Coordination Council,
the Albemarle County Planning Commission, the
Charlottesville Planning Commission, and the
University Master Planning Council in developing
goals/objectives/standards and a plan for the study
area.
4. To work with other parties involved in t;he planning
process including residents, property owners, and
community/business leaders, as part of the study
area advisory committee.
D. Principle Areas of Concern
1. Potential effects on surrounding areas by more
intense use of the Milton Airport property by the
University.
2. Visual effects of development of the property.
3. Traffic impacts on roads serving the area.
II. LAND USE PROFILE
A. Existing Land Use Analysis
The Milton Airport study Area has a Rural Area land use
designation as identified in the Albemarle County
Comprehensive Plan. The study area is currently being
utilized for several different uses as outlined in this
section.
There are three (3) non-residential structures in the study
area now used as storage facilities by the University. Two
(2) of the structures were built as airplane hangars. One
2
(1) of the hangars houses folding chairs
graduation ceremonies at the University.
contains miscellaneous storage items not
basis.
which are used for
The other hangar
needed on a regular
The remaining structure is being used as a storage facility
for the University Firearms Range which is located on the
property. The Firearms Range is administered by the
University Police Department. other users of the firearms
range include the city of Charlottesville Police Department,
the Albèmarle County Police Department, the Charlottesville/
Albemarle Joint Security Complex, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation.
The Faulconer Construction co., Inc. currently leases
approximately 89 acres from the Univer~ity on this site.
This land has been leased for approximately two (2) years
and is used to maintain a nursery for their landscaping
business. The Garden spot also leased the property for the
same use prior to the Faulconer Construction Co.
. ¡
A vacated landing strip is located on the property as well.
A portion of the landing strip is currently being leased by
the Rivanna Radio Control Club, Inc. in exchange for grounds
keeping services. The Rivanna Radio Control Club, in
operation since 1970, has approximately 57 members who
meet on weekends to fly model" airplanes on the fields they
maintain.
B. Zoning Analysis of the Milton Airport Property
1. The Milton Airport property is zoned RA, Rural
Areas. The Rural Areas District was created for
the following purposes:
a. Preservation of agricultural and forestal lands
and activities;
b. Water supply protection;
c. Limited service delivery to the rural areas; and
d. Conservation of natural, scenic, and historic
resources.
2. Approximately 3/4 of the study area is located in
the Flood Hazard Overlay District (see Map 3).
It is estimated that 134 of the 172 total acres
is located in the flood plain. The Albemarle
County Zoning Ordinance outlines the intent,
application, general requirements, prohibited uses,
permitted uses, etc. for Flood Hazard Overlay
Districts (Section 30.3).
3
C. zoning Analysis of Adjacent Properties
1. To the east of the study area, across the Rivanna
River, is the Glenmore subdivision located in the
Village of Rivanna (see Map 4). The Glenmore
subdivision is zonedPRD, Planned Residential
Development. At 1,195 acres, Glenmore represents
the majority of the Village of Rivanna's 1,760
acres. Glenmore also represents 750 of the 885
dwellings which could be located in the Village of
Rivanna. To date, final plats for 321 lots have
been approved.
A 100' buffer along the east side of the Rivanna
River has been reserved within the Glenmore
subdivision for a possible extension/expansion of
the Rivanna Greenbelt (see Section IV) from the
Milton boat landing (located where North Milton
Road crosses the Rivanna River). A golf course is
being constructed between this buffer and the ¡
residential dwelling units within the subdivision.
2. Adjacent properties to the north, west, and south
of the study area are zoned RA, Rural Areas.
D. Development Potential
Under the current land use and zoning designations, it is
estimated that if the study area were fully developed, a
maximum of 17 dwelling units could be constructed outside of
the flood plain.
III. TRANSPORTATION
Traffic counts conducted by the Virginia Department of
Transportation (VDOT) in 1990 indicate a total of 3,775
vehicle trips per day on Milton Road between North Milton
Road and Thomas Jefferson Parkway (Route 53).
Sight distance when accessing Milton Road from the existing
study area entrance is poor. VDOT has identified the need
to make spot improvements north of Milton Hills Drive (Route
1120) which may correct the problem.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
A. Flood Plain
As mentioned earlier, approximately 3/4 of , the study area is
located in the flood plain. Therefore, thè type and extent
of future development is limited in this area. Listed below
are the prohibited uses, the permitted uses by right, and
4
the permitted uses by special use permit in the flood plain
as outlined in the Albemarle County zoning Ordinance Flood
Hazard overlay District provisions (Section 30.3):
PROHIBITED USES
1. Storage of gasoline, kerosene and other petroleum
products and flammable liquids, dynamite, blasting
caps and other explosives, pesticides and poisons
and other such materials which could result in
-hazard to life and/or water pollution in the event
of flooding.
2. Storage of machinery and vehicles except as
accessory to a permitted use.
3. Stockpiling of debris, logs, junk cars and similar
materials.
4. Structures designed or intended for human
habitation including mobile homes, regardless of
proposed usage.
PERMITTED USES - BY RIGHT
1. Agricultural uses, excluding structures ,of any kind;
limited to field cröps, pasture, grazing,
livestock, raising poultry, horticulture,
viticulture, and forestry.
2. Recreational uses, excluding structures of any kind
and uses involving human habitation, such as parks¡
swimming areas¡ golf courses and driving ranges¡
picnic grounds¡ wildlife and nature preserves: game
farms: fish hatcheries¡ shooting preserves¡ target,
trap and skeet ranges: hunting, fishing and hiking
trails: athletic fields¡ and horse show grounds.
3. Flood warning aids and devices, water monitoring
devices and the like.
4. Fences.
5. Electric, gas, oil and communications facilities,
including poles, lines, pipes, meters and related
facilities for distribution of local service and
owned and operated by a public utility, but
excluding multi-legged tower structures.
6. Water distribution and sewage collection lines and
appurtenances owned and operated by the Albemarle
County service Authority, but excluding pumping
stations and holding ponds.
5
7. Accessory structures to uses permitted in the
floodway, excluding structures for human
habitation; provided that any such structure
permitted shall be firmly anchoreq to prevent
flotation, collapse or lateral movement due to
flooding.
PERMITTED USES - BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT
1. Dams, levees and other structures for water supply
. and flood control.
2. Water related uses such as boat docks, canoe
liveries, bridges, ferries, culverts and river
crossings of transmission lines of all types.
3. Sod farming, topsoil, sand and gravel removal.
4. Pump stations for water or wastewater including
power supply and control devises, holding ponds ~nd
other appurtenances.
5. Bank erosion structures.
6. Hydroelectric power generation.
7. Aircraft landing strip excluding structures and
aircraft parking/storage.
B. Scenic River Designation
The Rivanna River,· which borders the study area to the east,
is a State Designated Scenic River. State designations are
determined by the Virginia Department of Conservation and
Recreation. No County designation has been given to this
river. aowever, the Open Space Plan recommends that a
Virginia S.cenic River Designation should automatically
qualify a ·stream for a County Scenic Stream designation. A
scenic stream designation restricts construction, grading
and cutting of trees within 15 feet of the stream, and
restricts construction and excessive cutting within 65 feet
of the stream.
C. Water Resource Protection Area (RPA) Ordinance
The purpose of this ordinance is to protect and improve the
quality of water resources within Albemarle County by
minimizing the effects of human activity upon streams,
nontidal wetlands, and other water bodies. Chapter 19.2 _
Section 6 of the County Code states that the RPA includes
tributary streams, nontidal wetlands contiguous to tributary
streams, and a 100 foot vegetated buffer area located
adjacent to and landward of nontidal wetlands and along both
sides of any tributary stream. The Rivanna River is within
6
the RPA. Section 8 states that a 100 foot buffer area of
vegetation that is effective in retarding runoff, preventing
erosion, and filtering nonpoint source pollution from runoff
shall be retained if present or established where it does
not exist.
D. Rivanna River Greenbelt Plan
Development of a Rivanna River Greenbelt Plan is a
recommendation of the Open Space Plan. The President's
Commission on Americans Outdoors defined greenbelts/
greenways as "corridors of private and public lands and
waters to provide people with access to open spaces close to
where they live and to link together the urban and rural
spaces in the landscape." Greenbelts are a class of parks
provided by localities along with regional, district,
community, and other parks.
The Milton Airport property is included within the study
area of the proposed Rivanna River Greenbelt Plan. The
plan's study area generally consists of all parcels of land
adjacent to both banks of the South Fork Rivanna River from
Ivy Creek Natural Area to its confluence with the North
Fork, and continuing as the main branch of the Rivanna to
the Village of Rivanna (see Map 5). It also includes all
lands within the 100-year flood plain and certain additional
lands of natural significancë. In addition, the proposed
Greenbelt Plan recommends the possible continuation of the
study area another 3.5 miles to the Fluvanna County line, as
the Rivanna Conservation Society is currently attempting to
establish a similar Greenbelt in Fluvanna County.
The goal and objectives for the proposed Rivanna River
Greenbelt Plan are outlined below:
1. Goal - To create a river park corridor which
ensures the protection and preservation of the
riverine environment while providing recreational
opportunities to the citizens of the
Charlottesville/Albemarle area.
2. Objectives - The following objectives have been
established to implement this goal:
a. Preserve significant natural areas adjacent to
the River, including flood plain, wetlands,
critical slopes, wildlife habitat and travel
corridors, and other adjacent areas of
significance. continue to protect water
quality as a crucial component of the riverine
environment.
b. Provide additional recreation and open space
opportunities to residents of Albemarle County
7
and the Charlottesville region, as recommended
by the 1989 Virginia outdoors Plan.
c. Protect historic and archaeologically
significant sites. Enhance access and increase
public awareness of historic sites near the
river.
d. Improve access to existing and future parks and
natural areas by providing a physical linkage
in the form of trails.
e. Provide an open space buffer between Hollymead
and the Urban Area and linear park access
between the County urban neighborhoods,
communities, and villages and the city.
E. streams and Nontidal Wetlands
There are two (2) intermittent streams which flow through,the
study area. A small tributary of the Rivanna River crosses
the study area near its northern boundary and Jumping
Branch, a tributary of Henderson Creek, crosses the
southwest corner of the study area.
Nontidal wetlands have been identified on lands immediately
adjacent to Jumping Branch and in isolated pockets
throughout the study area (see Map 6). The sources used to
determine these wetlands include National Wetlands Inventory
maps and Soil Conservation Service maps indicating the two
(2) hydric soil units, 95 Wehadkee and 96B Worsham. These
nontidal wetland maps are the best available source of
information showing probable location of wetlands.
F. Historic Preservation
The location of the study area is in the vicinity of the
historic village of Milton located on the Rivanna River at
the intersection of Milton Road and North Milton Road.
Milton is a historical village area which was the chief
commercial center and shipping port for Albemarle County in
the late 18th century, with a public tobacco warehouse and a
large merchant mill.
The Rivanna River was navigable to the village of Milton
as a result of a series of locks and dams along the river.
The remnant of one (1) such lock is located just south of
the :Hilton Airport study area.
The viewshed from Monticello encompasses portions of the
study area. Therefore, future development on portions of
this site will be directly visible from Monticello.
8
V. PUBLIC UTILITIES/COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES
A. There are no public utilities currently servicing the
study area.
B. Community facilities servicing the study area include
the following:
1. Stone Robinson Elementary School (Route 729) - in
addition to school services, provides community
level park services.
2. Rivanna Park (Route 20 North) - provides County
level park services.
3. East Rivanna Fire Station - provides fire and
rescue services.
4. Milton Public Boat Landing - provides access to
the Rivanna River.
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS
The following recommendations have been developed in
conjunction with the Milton Airport Advisory Committee. The
recommendations are based on--the information provided in the
Milton Airport Area B Study Background Summary, public
comments received at a public hearing held in the Milton
community, and subsequent committee meetings. The
recommendations are in priority order as follows:
A. Continue to maintain current uses on site.
While the level of noise generated on the site as a
result of the firearms range and radio control model
airplane practice field may from time to time be heard
off-site, it is felt that discontinuing these uses is
not necessary.
The use of the hangar buildings for storage, the
leasing of a portion of the site for agricultural use
(tree nursery), and other uses as desired by the
University (academic research, recreation, etc.) are
expected to continue.
B. Retain the existing vegetative buffer along Milton Road
between the site and residential property.
There is currently a natural vegetative buffer along
Milton Road primarily consisting of pines and cedars.
This buffer plays an especially important role to
soften the impact to adjacent residential properties of
any existing or potential uses.
9
~
C. Rèview site for potential passive recreational uses.
The frontage of this site along the Rivanna River could
provide for a riverside trail, possibly as part of the
Rivanna Greenbelt. There is a potential for other
passive recreational uses such as picnicking, nature
walks, jogging/running/cross country trails, and
fishing.
D. Review site for other potential recreational uses.
A need for additional recreational field space within
the County has been identified by the Albemarle County
Department of Parks and Recreation and the Soccer
Organization of Charlottesville-Albemarle. Both have
identified this location as having potential
suitability for field space. The site has also been
identified by the Department of Parks and Recreation as
having potential for secured or gated river access for
hand launched boats.
Should this property be considered for field space or
river access, evaluation should not onÍy include
Countywide needs, but impact on the immediate area as
to increased traffic and road adequacy, security of
site, conflicts with or potential loss of the Rivanna
Radio Control Club and the firearms range uses on-site,
and sensitivity to the site's archeological resources
and historic value.
Any use of this site for recreational purposes should be
limited initially to the passive recreational uses outlined
in Priority C of this section to assess the impacts on
traffic generation/safety (sight distance at entrance), site
security, the scheduling/appropriateness of other uses
on~site, and other community concerns.
Any consideration of this site for recreational uses will,
at a minimum, necessitate discussion between the property
owner (University of Virginia) and the County of Albemarle
regarding alternatives for development and operation.
Should recreational uses be pursued, a master plan should be
developed with input from the community"and the general
public. This could be undertaken by a consultant,
University students, or a Planning task force.
10
APPENDIX A
THREE PAR!1 AGREEMENT
The CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE; the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE anå
THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA~ hereby
agree as follows:
The Universitv Will:
1. Voluntarily comply with the land use plan~ and
regulations (as exemplified by those listed in Exhibit 1) of
either the City or the County regarding the use of real estate
he¡d in Area C on the attached map.
Area C* includes all land not included in Areas A and B (see
attached map).
2. Voluntarily submit its construction and/or development
.. ~~
plans for review by the City or County to determine their
compliance with land use plans and regulations on any real estate
held in Area B on the attached map; and make reasonable efforts
to comply with any recommendations received.
Area B* includes land which lies at the boundaries of or
between the University and either the City or the County and on
which the activities of any or all three of the parties might
have an effect. Area B will be designated a "study area." The
City, County and University will work with e~ch other to try to
develop a master plan for the study area perhaps by beginning
with its most critical parts. The intent is that the results of
the cooperative study will be made a part of the Comprehensive
Plan of each body.
3. VOluntarily submit its construction and/or development
plans for review by the City or County on any real estate held in
11
Area A on the attached map; and make reasonable efforts to comply
with. any recommendations received. Area A* includes land either
on the Grounds of the University or at its borders. Since some
portions of Area A are of critical importance to the City and
County, the University also agrees that it will involve the City
and County in the development or revision of its Master Plan for
1 and use, and also in the study of those areas of A which, by
mutual consent, will affect the land use plans of each other.
4. Anticipate the formation of a Real Estate Foundation
_reated for the acquisition and development of land which would
not be owned directly by the Rector and Visitors, but which would
serve University purposes. The Real Estate Foundation will abide
by all City and County- land use laws and- regulations (as
exemplified by Exhibit I) regarding any property it holds. The
Foundation also will pay all applicable real estate taxes.
5. Not accept transfer of land to be used for investment
purposes from the Real Estate Foundation to itself primarily for
the purpose of avoiding the application of the City's and
County·s land use laws and regulations or taxation.
6. Accept a representative of the City and County as
non-voting members of its Master Plan Committee.
7. Involve City and County representatives in site
selection studies on any major new facilities which may be
planned.
*Any difference of opinion over the geographical extent of either
Area A, B, or C shall be governed by the 5ttached map.
12
The County and/or Citv Will:
1. Submit to the University and to each other for review
all proposed changes in land use plans or regulations in Area B
on the attached map and make reasonable efforts to comply with
any recommendations made by the other parties.
2. S ubmi t to t he Un i ve rsi ty f or review all proposed
changes in land use plans or regulations in Areas A and C on the
attached map and make reasonable efforts to comply with any
recommendations made by the Universi~y.
3. Attempt- to define a desired community growth rat,e
within its laws, regulations, or plans and attempt to regulate
Jevelopment according to this growth rate to the extent allowed
by' law.
4. Include a representative of the University as a
no~-voting member of their planning commissions.
13
The City, County and the University Will:
1. Adopt the same length of land use planning period.
2. Develop and use common definitions and common land use
data bases having the same or similar data elements.
3. Adopt the same interval between major reconsiderations
of their land use plans and schedule those reconsiderations for
the same year, unless precluded from doing so by State
requirements.
4. Adopt a substantially similar topical outline for the
purpose of describing their land use plans.
5. Share drafts of their land use plans with each other
;
for review and comment in advance of any public hearings.
6. Indicate those portions of each other's plans with
which it agrees and do nothing during ~he planning period to
change those portions of the plan without mutual consultation.
7. .Not sponsor, seek, nor support legislation restricting
the powers of each other regarding any of the terms of the
understanding or regarding . any other matters related to taxation,
land use planning, or land use regulation except by mutual
agreement.
8. Agree to non-binding arbitration of any disputes during
the term of this Agreement. Arbitrators shall be selected as
follows:
(a) In case of disagreement involving all three parties,
each party shall select one arbitrator.
(b) In case of disagreement between a~y two of the parties,
14
I
,.
each party shall select one arbitrator and these two arbitrators
shall select a third. If the first two selected are unable to
agree on a third, then they shall request the third selection be
made by the judge of the Circuit Court of the City of
Charlottesville.
9~ Agree these understandings may be dissolved on one
year's written notice by any party to the other two parties.
10. Take no actions which circumvent the purposes of this
agreement.
BY RESOLUTION duly adopted by Council on the 21st day of
April
, 1986, the Mayor was authorized to execut~'this
Agreement on behalf of the City of Charlottesville.
BY RESOLUTION duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors on
the 14thday of May , 19·86, t·he Chairman was -authorized to
execute this Agreement on beÌlal f of the County of Albemarle.
BY RESOLUTION duly adopted by the Board of Visitors on the
31st day of January, 1986, the President was authorized to
execute this Agreement on behalf of the Rector and Visitors of
the University of Virginia. .
CI~RLOTTESVILLE
By
COUNT~F AL~ErE.. ..C~~1
<-B¥L~ ß '-~- ~"-^--
( ~
THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF
TH~UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
By ~'--~ &u ~~
15
MAP 1
. Area C
l
~fD;f~ Area ß
'nt~ut.ue Rout~ 6-1
Area C
NOT SHOWN- AREA ß fOR AIRPORT AND VIVARIUM fARIYI
I
16
r---~
¡ ,
\ }-.
7\
\
I
8(
/
,
1/
6 ,j'IU...
/-. .
, '"'"
" ''"'"
\
" \
IU \
:,(
,.
\
\ )
~8 r<'
f \.
(
) /
/ ) t (
/ \.
~~ ,~~I
26 94
~~ t
;
"
,
\
I.'
cr·· ==' I
l I,
",. / J ¡"
/~ ~)
,® 'r I /-
~ ~} \\' ( .-.:.:.-.:..-
~·;i;~.· .
I' ~=.=~'" : ..<.' .....:::.
,-:.' .,- . --4-· -~
/ ..>:,,':..;'.' ',B \F~~~~
. ;....:~ ~ ¡:J ~."""',
./ aJ...u ~
.~..., '\ ;:¡¡ , ..
. ;:::. I, 'II I Q I:' '" (1
~ 0/1 ~~-
~~. '\ -~~
:~/ ~
.
r
~ '.
"
, .
-~-:-;'",;J~ =. ''::; = ~. ';
..,
:;<:':.::-
~~ :.-; ~
'"
./ U
, UJ
, 2
, ~ , 0
. .'"""-. , , N
" ,............
I' /1
"~':" _. :¡:/"
~='" -'~i
I~ ::
. .,...:i,(
I, .
~ ;:/
,
t§
. ¡.
'C'"" _""~,
':;.,.
\
\ u
( UJ
2
o
N
".' ../..
;:,/.,
'/';4:;V/" x
y:' \ ~
.'/' ~--"... ~ ~ ./
, - .--......m...-..
. ,I ~
~ .' ~
., I'"
'..."
". ·9
.¡,.¡ '- '\
:')? ~~, .
I ""'-
',' . ::::,.."
"-.
/
\.
..;' \.'
\...
r'
./
"I....
I
\
"}
~..
\
si'
.r-"
/ \' 'I$.'~:;
./ <cf~!"";·· \.~ &:~:;:.::'
....." / ~. ..~
,;:.;;';¡¡ ~ ,-;;.:- IX {l:'
)\, /:" . r
,~,~:r--. I /
~, )~/
i:!) \ ///
~
j.
I'
,
---.. ,.
.. -=~
'ì
"- <:::::,
I
cr
18
MAP 3
~
,,; ~~"''';
0/
..........
ð' /:.'~\"'=--~
".. 11-:;
. .1;';'1.1:""
~~ I
,,,,,,,,<OJ). :,'.:
II (O! ':S
IJ / ",<'
~II ,¡(- '~f/,-r'"
(;;;-~'- -~~::;..
.~~. - ./.
I~.. /'
...----==-",,'
I.'
h
,.
,.
i'
'---
u
UJ
2
o
N
'-
"-
'."""..-...
./
~
.;:. .~
~
.
MAP 4
"
GLENMORE
VILLAGE OF
y--
c::=J
RIVANNA
....
..........
.. ,-::~.r,'"
/
19
.
'.
.
- -----
\
\. t;
XlV'
~
~
G?
Carter Mln
FT. .
----.. .
- ... -- --~'
·.,.BI
',,-=
~~ ,Greenwa y
I
~
..
~
y..//
/A!l
\ f\Ò,ß 'I·
~.. \~ ~/~.- - ,
20
\;
, j
Proposed R'
~vanna
Public P
arks
'). . Possible Extension
___i/)
--,-~- - .
Greenway
\
..
.'
....
.
Weiland CSClernHnalions have been made only 'or arcas spccHlcally dellnoateCl
Contact SCS tor any additional determinations outside at the boundary, sUCh as
properly line discrepancies. before starling land use change or drainage aClivHy.
These weUand determinations apply to food Security Act- 1985 regulahons only.
Other agencães may require permits tor some wetland activities.
MAP 6
Areas not marked as wetlands may contain arcas 01 wet (hydllC) 5011:¡ Onø$lle
investigation will be requareo to (jewrmlne if IhC5e areas arc weU.1I1C5_ \l15uat
interpretations 01 maps and pnotog(~;:>ns were used to make InIS Inventory.
there lore a margin ot eHor eXists In this process.
510
,-
21
WETLANDS ®
\ , 'J ( \\'(' \) G20 k\".i« ulO
i \510 ,\ h ..~C'~\\ 62(;
Form. 3
7/25/86
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hal!
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
April 20, 1995
Commonwealth Transportation Board
1401 East Broad Street
Richmond, VA 23219
Re: County of Albemarle - Meadow Creek Parkway
Dear Board Members:
Based on comments heard by Albemarle County Board members who attended the
Commonwealth Transportation Board's meeting on April 19, 1995, there seemed to be confusion
regarding Albemarle County's priorities for improvements in the Route 29 North corridor. The
Albemarle Board of County Supervisors unanimously approved a motion, at it's meeting on April
19, 1995, that a letter be sent to the Commonwealth Transportation Board stating that Albemarle
County's highest transportation priority is the Meadow Creek Parkway. The Board also
requested that this letter become part of the Commonwealth Transportation Board's official
records.
Construction of the Meadow Creek Parkway is critical in solving the transportation needs
of Albemarle County and Central Virginia and is supported by our elected officials for primary
road status. The Board of Supervisor's highest priority in it's Plan is construction of the
Meadow Creek Parkway and to receive primary road designation.
Albemarle County is very concerned about this issue and wanted the Commonwealth
Transportation Board members to know it's feelings and be aware of it's priorities.
Sincerely,
¡J~r~:5 _
-' L-Af/
Walter F. Perkins /~v-
Chairman
WFP/jng
,
_J
*
Printed on recycled paper