Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-04-04 FIN A L 9:00 A.M. April 5, 1995 Room 7, County Office Building 1) Call to Order. 2) Pledge of Allegiance. 3) Moment of Silence. 4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. 5) Consent Agenda (on next sheet). 6) Approval of Minutes: December 7, 1994; February 13{A) and February 15, 1995. 7) Transportation Matters: a) Discussion: Route 610 Proposed Improvements (deferred from March 1, 1995) . b) Discussion: Route 633 Improvements. c) Report on Route 29 North Crossover near Carrsbrook Drive. d) Discussion: Charlottesville Transit Service - changes to Whitewood Road/Albert Court bus stop on Route 9. e) Other Transportation Matters. 8) 10:00 a.m. - Public Hearing on a request to amend the service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority for water and sewer to include parcel known as Parcel 30 on Tax Map 32, for the Full Gospel Assembly of Charlottesville. 9) 10:10 a.m. - Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 3, Amusement, of the Code of Albemarle. This amendment in Section 3-28, Limitations on bingo operations, will add wording allowing the operation of bingo games on Saturday and Sunday to be between 1:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. Hours of operation for the remainder of the week remain the same, 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. 10) 10:15 a.m. - Public Hearing on a request to amend the service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority for water and sewer to include parcels 88, 88A, 89, 90, 90A and 93 on Tax Map 56 for Highlands West Limited Partnership. 11) 10:30 a.m. - Appeal: ARB-F(SIGN)-95-02 La Hacienda, Tax Map 78, Parcel 55A2. 12) Resolution authorizing request to the Virginia Division of Game and Inland Fisheries for funding assistance for an accessible fishing pier at Chris Greene Lake. 13) Report on Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with the Jefferson Area Board for Aging in relation to capital request for new Adult Day Care Center. 14) Request to create Historic Preservation and Mountaintop Protection Committees. 15) Discussion: Financing options and privatization issues on the Jail Expansion. 16) Discussion: Board Room Sound System. 17) Discussion: Minor League Baseball. 18) Discussion: High School Bond Referendum. 19) Request for resolution of intent to advertise for public hearing to amend and reordain Chapter 9, Fire Protection, Code of Albemarle. 20) Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. 21) Recess. 22) 7:00 P.M. - Reconvene in Room #7. 23) Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. 24) Public Hearing: FY 1995-96 County Budget. 25) Public Hearing: 1995 Tax Rates. 26) Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. 27) Adjourn. CON S E N T AGENDA FOR APPROVAL: 5.1 Request to replace one member on the Agricultural/Forestal Districts Advisory Committee. 5.2 Accept Southern City and Entrance Corridor Study and forward to MPO Policy Committee. 5.3 Resolution to accept Lanford Drive in Lanford Hills Subdivision into the State Secondary System of Highways. FOR INFORMATION: 5.4 Letter dated March 22, 1995 from A. G. Tucker, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, forwarding the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently under construction and the quarterly report of projects under design in Albemarle County. 5.5 Memorandum dated March 28, 1995, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, providing information on the 1993 Preliminary Sales Ratio Study. 5.6 1994 Third Quarter Building Report prepared by the Department of Planning and Community Development. 5.7 1994 Fourth Quarter Building Report prepared by the Department of Planning and Community Development. 5.8 1994 Year End Building Report prepared by the Department of Planning and Community Development. 5.9 Copy of Planning Commission minutes for March 7 and March 14, 1995. 5.10 Summary of activities for the Jefferson Area Board for Aging (JABA) Advisory Council prepared by Robert J. Walter, Jr. 5.11 Letter dated March 15, 1995 from Robert T. Skunda, Secretary of Commerce and Trade, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, re: regional visitors center on Route 29 in Danville. 5.12 Copy of letter dated March 17, 1995 from Julie L. Vosmik, Director, Division of Survey and Register, Department of Historic Resources, to F. Palmer Weber, Malvern Farm, stating that the Board of Historic Resources rescheduled its consideration of Malvern, Albemarle County for inclusion in the Virginia Landmarks Register. 5.13 Copy of minutes of the Board of Directors of the Albemarle County Service Authority for February 23, 1995. 5.14 Copy of minutes of the Board of Directors of the Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority for February 27, 1995. 5.15 Copy of letter dated March 22, 1995, to the Honorable David J. Toscano, Mayor, City of Charlottesville, from the Honorable Walter F. Perkins, Chairman, providing information on items in the County's FY 1995-96 proposed budget that were approved by the Board during its work sessions. 5.16 February, 1995, Financial Report. 5.17 Letter dated April 3, 1995, from Angela G. Tucker, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, providing responses to items discussed at the Board's meeting of March 1, 1995. 5.18 Letter dated March 27, 1995, from Claude D. Garver, Jr., Assistant Commissioner Operations, Department of Transportation, re: change in Primary System made necessary by the relocation and construction on Route 250. 5.19 Letter dated March 27, 1995, from Claude D. Garver, Jr., Assistant Commissioner Operations, Department of Transportation, re: changes in Primary System made necessary by the relocation and construction on Route 20. 5.20 Memorandum dated March 31, 1995, from James M. Heilman, General Registrar, re: District/Precinct Name Changes. TEN TAT I V E 9:00 A.M. April 5, 1995 Room 7, County Office Building 1) Call to Order. 2) Pledge of Allegiance. 3) Moment of Silence. 4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. 5) Consent Agenda (on next sheet). 6) Approval of Minutes: December 7, 1994; February 13 (A) and February 15, 1995. 7) Transportation Matters: a) Discussion: Route 610 Proposed Improvements (deferred from March 1, 1995) . b) Discussion: Route 633 Improvements. c) Report on Route 29 North Crossover near Carrsbrook Drive. d) Discussion: Charlottesville Transit Service - changes to Whitewood Road/Albert Court bus stop on Route 9. e) Other Transportation Matters. 8) 10:00 a.m. - Public Hearing on a request to amend the service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority for water and sewer to include parcel known as Parcel 30 on Tax Map 32, for the Full Gospel Assembly of Charlottesville. 9) 10:10 a.m. - Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 3, Amusement, of the Code of Albemarle. This amendment in Section 3-28, Limitations on bingo operations, will add wording allowing the operation of bingo games on Saturday and Sunday to be between 1:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. Hours of operation for the remainder of the week remain the same, 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. 10) 10:15 a.m. - Public Hearing on ù request to amend the service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority for water and sewer to include parcels 88, 88A, 89, 90, 90A and 93 on Tax Map 56 for Highlands West Limited Partnership. 11) 10:30 a.m. - Appeal: ARB-F(SIGN)-95-02 La Hacienda, Tax Map 78, Parcel 55A2. 12) Resolution authorizing request to the Virginia Division of Game and Inland Fisheries for funding assistance for an accessible fishing pier at Chris Greene Lake. 13) Report on Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with the Jefferson Area Board for Aging in relation to capital request for new Adult Day Care Center. 14) Request to create Historic Preservation and Mountaintop Protection Committees. 15) Discussion: Financing options and privatization issues on the Jail Expansion. 16) Discussion: Board Room Sound System. 17) Discussion: Minor League Baseball. 18) Discussion: High School Bond Referendum. 19) Request for resolution of intent to advertise for public hearing to amend and reordain Chapter 9, Fire Protection, Code of Albemarle. 20) Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. 21) Recess. 21) 7:00 P.M. - Reconvene in Room #7. 22) Public Hearing: FY 1995-96 County Budget. 23) Public Hearing: 1995 Tax Rates. 24) Adjourn. CONSENT AGENDA FOR APPROVAL: 5.1 Request to replace one member on the Agricultural/Forestal Districts Advisory Committee. 5.2 Accept Southern City and Entrace Corridor Study and forward to MPO Policy Committee. 5.3 Resolution to accept Langford Drive in Langford Hills Subdivision into the State Secondary System of Highways. FOR INFORMATION: 5.4 Letter dated March 22, 1995 from A. G. Tucker, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, forwarding the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently under construction and the quarterly report of projects under design in Albemarle County. 5.5 Memorandum dated March 28, 1995, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive, providing information on the 1993 Preliminary Sales Ratio Study. 5.6 1994 Third Quarter Building Report prepared by the Department of Planning and Community Development. 5.7 1994 Fourth Quarter Building Report prepared by the Department of Planning and Community Development. 5.8 1994 Year End Building Report prepared by the Department of Planning and Community Development. 5.9 Copy of Planning Commission minutes for March 7 and March 14, 1995. 5.10 Summary of activities for the Jefferson Area Board for Aging (JABA) Advisory Council prepared by Robert J. Walter, Jr. 5.11 Letter dated March 15, 1995 from Robert T. Skunda, Secretary of Commerce and Trade, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, re: regional visitors center on Route 29 in Danville. 5.12 Copy of letter dated March 17, 1995 from Julie L. Vosmik, Director, Division of Survey and Register, Department of Historic Resources, to F. Palmer Weber, Malvern Farm, stating that the Board of Historic Resources rescheduled its consideration of Malvern, Albemarle County for inclusion in the Virginia Landmarks Register. 5.13 Copy of minutes of the Board of Directors of the Albemarle County Service Authority for February 23, 1995. 5.14 Copy of minutes of the Board of Directors of the Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority for February 27, 1995. 5.15 Copy of letter dated March 22, 1995, to the Honorable David J. Toscano, Mayor, City of Charlottesville, from the Honorable Walter F. Perkins, Chairman, providing information on items in the County's FY 1995-96 proposed budget that were approved by the Board during its work sessions. 5.16 February, 1995, Financial Report. f David P. Bowennan Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Mðrtin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White HaU Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. ScottsviHe Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive Ella W. Carey, Clerk ~~ FROM: DATE: April 6, 1995 SUBJECT: Board Actions of AprilS, 1995 At the Board of Supervisors' meeting held on AprilS, 1995, the following actions were taken: Agenda Item No.1. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order at 9:03 p.m., by the Chairman, Mr. Perkins, with all members being present. Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. Mr. John Hornuff appeared to complain that the County's Noise Ordinance is inade- quate, and to offer remedies for the measuring of noises. Item 5.1. Request to replace one member on the Agricultural/Forestal Districts Advisory Committee. Approved. Mrs. Humphris suggested that Rosemary Dent be appointed. Item 5.2. Accept Southern City and Entrance Corridor Study and forward to MPO Policy Committee. Mrs. Humphris noted that in the two places where the staff report refers to the "MPO Policy Committee" it should say "MPO Board". Approved. Item 5.3. Resolution to accept Lanford Drive in Lanford Hills Subdivision into the State Secondary System of Highways. Adopted. Resolution forwarded to Engineering. Item 5.4. Letter dated March 22, 1995, from A. G. Tucker, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, forwarding the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently under construction and the quarterly report of projects under design in Albemarle County. Angela Tucker clarified that on the Project Listing attached to this letter, No. 4 should read "Route 631 from Berkmar Drive to Route 29 North", and No.5. should read "Route 631 from Route 743 to Berkmar Drive." No. 17. is "Route 866 (Greenbrier Drive) from Route 743 (Hydrau- lic Road) to Route 1455." Mrs. Tucker said No.4 will only be built if it is accepted as a piece of the current project. * Printed on recycled paper Memo To: Date: Page 2 Robert W. Tucker, Jr. April 6, 1995 Item 5.5. Memorandum dated March 28, 1995, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., county Executive, providing information on the 1993 Preliminary Sales Ratio Study. Mrs. Thomas would like to have a listing showing how well other counties do. Item 5.6. 1994 Third Quarter Building Report prepared by the Department of Planning and Community Development. (Note: Mrs. Thomas thought the Board was to receive a quarterly report on the number of accessory apartments approved. They have not received a report as of this date. Zoning Ordinance amendment was adopted August 10, 1994.) Item 5.9. Copy of Planning Commission minutes for March 7 and March 14, 1995. Mrs. Thomas noted that on page 2 of the minutes of March 14, 1995, at the bottom of the page, the sentence reading "only the open space category requires that a property be part of an ag-forestal district" is not true. Mr. Davis said there are three different ways land can be included in land use taxation. 1) If there is a permanent easement dedicating the land to open space; 2) if it a member of an ag- forest district; and, 3) if there is a use agreement with the Board of Supervisors that provides that the land will be maintained in open space for a period of four to ten years. Item 5.20. Memorandum dated March 31, 1995, from James M. Heilman, General Registrar, re: District/precinct Name Changes. Mr. Bowerman brought to the Board's attention this memorandum stating that the Justice Department has approved the change of name of "Charlottesville" to "Rio" District. He said that, as far as he is concerned, there is no reason to order new stationery to indicate this change. Depending on the amount of stationery left, the Clerk may go ahead and reorder. Agenda Item No. 7a. Transportation Matters: Discussion: Route 610 Proposed Improvements (deferred from March 1, 1995). Mrs. Tucker informed the Board that from Route 20 to the end of state maintenance, 2.0+ miles the road will be widened and improved within a 50 foot right-of-way, and surface treated. There will be no realignment of Route 610 with Route 612. Agenda Item No. 7b. Transportation Matters: Discussion: Route 633 Improve- ments. Mrs. Tucker said a field review is being planned soon with representatives from the railroad. There appears to be a possibility of upgrading structure No. 6029 to a two-lane non-restricted facility, and, at such time, the Department will take over full maintenance of that structure. At this time, it is the Railroad's responsibility to maintain it. It would have to be included in the Six-Year Plan for some funding along with improvements to Route 633 which is a gravel road. Agenda Item No. 7c. Transportation Matters: Report on Route 29 North Crossover near Carrsbrook Drive. Mrs. Tucker presented two new options. The Board agreed to support Alternative 1 which shows a reconfigured entrance of Carrsbrook Drive with Route 29 but not a relocated entrance, the crossover to be relocated from the southernmost entrance of Better Living to a more centered position opposite the the mid-point of the property, and, adding four-way stop signs on Carrsbrook Drive at Clarke Lane. A four-way stop sign at Northfields/Carrsbrook Drive is left to the discretion of the Highway Department. Agenda Item No. 7d. Transportation Matters: Discussion: Charlottesville Transit Service - changes to Whitewood Road/Albert Court bus stop on Route 9. Mr. Bowerman suggested that the bus stop be left as is. This item will be put back on Memo To: Date: Page 3 Robert W. Tucker, Jr. April 6, 1995 the agenda of May 3 for further discussion after talking to CTS and looking at costs involved. Agenda Item No.8. Public Hearing on a request to amend the service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority for water and sewer to include parcel known as Parcel 30 on Tax Map 32, for the Full Gospel Assembly of Charlottes- ville. APPROVED request as advertised. Agenda Item No.9. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 3, Amusement, of the Code of Albemarle. This amendment in Section 3-28, Limitations on bingo operations, will add wording allowing the operation of bingo games on Saturday and Sunday to be between 1:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. Hours of operation for the remainder of the week remain the same, 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. ADOPTED the ordinance as advertised. Copy attached. Agenda Item No. 10. Public Hearing on a request to amend the service area boundaries of the Albemarle County Service Authority for water and sewer to include parcels 88, 88A, 89, 90, 90A and 93 on Tax Map 56 for Highlands West Limited Partnership. APPROVED the request as advertised. Agenda Item No. 11. Appeal: ARB-F{SIGN)-95-02 La Hacienda, Tax Map 78, Parcel 55A2. GRANTED a certificate of appropriateness for the wall sign as approved by the Architectural Review Board, but removed the two conditions. Agenda Item No. 12. Resolution authorizing request to the Virginia Division of Game and Inland Fisheries for funding assistance for an accessible fishing pier at Chris Greene Lake. ADOPTED the attached ordinance. Agenda Item No. 13. Report on Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with the Jefferson Area Board for Aging in relation to capital request for new Adult Day Care Center. SUPPORTED the recommendations of staff as follows: Any contribution to the Adult Day Care Center be: 1) on a per capita basis based on the number of County residents over the age of 60; 2) spread out over a two-year period; and 3) placed in a contingency fund, contingent on matching contributions from other localities. The County should request the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission to convene the six jurisdictions to review and revise, if necessary, the initial agreement in order to clarify the roles and responsibilities of both JABA and the local governing bodies. Agenda Item No. 14. Request to create Historic Preservation and Mountaintop Protection Committees. AGREED to proceed as recommended by appointing members to a Historic Preservation Committee of approximately seven members, and by appointing members to a Mountain Protection Committee of approximately seven members. Member- ship is to be solicited by general advertisement in the local new media. Agenda Item No. 15. Discussion: Financing options and privatization issues on the Jail Expansion. VOTED to proceed to the next step in setting up a jail authority and the project for expanding the jail. The Board should work with the City on this issue. Memo To: Date: Page 4 Robert W. Tucker, Jr. April 6, 1995 Mr. Davis said the next step is to present to the Board the agreement that will establish the authority. He asked that Board members return comments on the draft agreement to him by the end of April. He also suggested that the Jail Board look at the draft agreement as well and provide its comments. Agenda Item No. 16. Discussion: Board Room Sound System. NO VOTE. By consensus agreed to proceed with the lavalier type mike. Agenda Item No. 17. Discussion: Minor League Baseball. Agreed that staff should end its efforts at this time. Agenda Item No. 18. Discussion: High School Bond Referendum. Received as information only. Agenda Item No. 19. Request for resolution of intent to advertise for public hearing to amend and reordain Chapter 9, Fire Protection, Code of Albemarle. SET public hearing for May 3, 1995, at 10:00 A.M. on the amendment to Section 9-19 only. The remainder of the ordinance is to be returned to staff for further work. Agenda Item No. 20. Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. Staff is to find a suitable meeting date for a JOINT PUBLIC HEARING with the School Board on a site for the new high school. Mrs. Humphris suggested the hearing be on a Monday night. Agenda Item No. 22. Public Hearing: FY 1995-96 County Budget. HELD. Directed the County Executive to bring back information on retaining a consultant to undertake a county-wide salary study. Agenda Item No. 23. Public Hearing: 1995 Tax Rates. HELD. No action. Attachments (3) cc: Richard E. Huff, II Roxanne White v. Wayne Cilimberg Larry W. Davis File , , COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Agricultural/Forestal Districts Advisory Committee - Request to Replace Member AGENDA DATE: AprilS, 1995 ACTION: INFORMATION: SUBJECTIPROPOSALlREOUEST: Request to replace one member on the Agricultural/Forestal Districts Advisory Committee CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Cilimberg, Ms. Scala REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: The AgriculturallF orestal Districts Advisory Committee ( Advisory Committee) was fonned in 1983 in order to advise the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors regarding agricultural/forestal districts. Attached is Section 15. 1-1510 of the Code of Virginia which describes the required composition of the Advisory Committee. Also attached is a list of current members. Marcia Joseph is currently employed as the County's Design Planner, but was appointed to the Committee several years ago before becoming employed by the County. While Ms. Joseph has been a valuable member of the Committee, she is giving up her position on the Committee to avoid any perception of a conflict of interest with her County job. DISCUSSION: The Board should appoint a new member to the Advisory Committee to replace Ms. Joseph. Magisterial district representation is not a requirement. However, it is useful to have committee members who represent all areas of the County. Another consideration in appointing a new member is that the Committee currently lacks a member with knowledge of horses. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that if the Board wishes for staff to make a recommendation for a replacement, this can be done as a consent agenda item next week. MARCIA.FRM 95.054 "..~..~.",.~--,- '~UOS¡^H3dnS:lO aI:JVOt~' ¡--- , 9)61 , - ~dV tnr \ t-~ (., ~"~li,: I .',',',',1: I,'.,:! ~ L'~ d. -'-~---------'------'-+' · '" AgriculturaVForestal Districts Advisory Committee Members 1. Stephen Murray, Chairman Landowner 6. W. Dan Maupin Landowner Route 2, Box 82 engaged in Route 2, Box 220 Earlysville, VA 22936 ag/forestal Charlottesville, VA 22901 PH: 973-8547 (H) production PH: 823-4732 (H) 2. Joseph H. Jones, Vice-Chair Landowner 7. Marcia Joseph Landowner Route 2, Box 541 engaged in RR 1, Box 1454 Crozet, VA 22932 ag/forestal Keswick, VA 22947-9501 PH: 823-4804 (day) production PH: 984-4199 (H) 823-4533 (evening) 296-5875 (W) 3. Walter F. Perkins Bd of Supervisors 8. Bruce Woodzell County Assessor Route 3, Box 79 Representative Real Estate Division Crozet, VA 22932 PH: 296-5856 (W) PH: 823-4987 (H) 295-2980 (W) 4. Bruce Hogue Landowner 9. Robert A. Bloch Landowner Route 10, Box 285 engaged in Route 2, Box 236 engaged in C'ville, V A 22903 ag/forestal Gordonsville, VA 22942 ag/forestal PH: 296-1806 (H) production PH: 296-2137 (H) production 5. Jacquelyne Huckle Landowner 10. P. Scott Morrill Landowner Route 1, Box 255 Route 4, Box 123 Earlysville, VA 22936 Scottsville, VA 24590 PH: 973-6414 (H) PH: 286-2987 (H) Staff Members Mary Joy Scala, Senior Planner Department of Planning and Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 PH: 296-5823 (W) 978-1928 (H) Gordon Yager, District Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service 695 Berkmar Court, Suite 2 Charlottesville, VA 22901-1406 PH: 975-0043 (W) t COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Southern City and Entrance Corridor Study AGENDA DATE: April 5, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: f? 5: vI;/ ß--; 5-2 INFORMATION: ACfION: SUBJECfIPROPOSAL/REOUEST: Status CONSENT AGENDA: ACfION: X INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CONT ACf(S): Messrs. Tucker, Cilimberg, Wade REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: The Southern City and Entrance CoITÌdor Study is ajoint study conducted by KELLERCO for the City of Charlottesville, Virginia Department of Transportation (VOOT), and Albemarle County through the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The key objective of this study is to develop an on-going cooperative planning process which results in a city-county- VDOT consensus on a Southern Charlottesville Transportation Plan and an Entrance Corridor Conceptual Plan. DISCUSSION: A summary of the Study's conclusions and recommendations, several of which impact the County, can be found in Attachment A. Recommendations include connector roads between Fifth Street and Route 742 and Route 742 and Route 20 (which is a current recommendation in the County's Comprehensive Plan) and the upgrading of the Fifth St/I- 64 interchange. Ivy Road(Route 250) and Avon Street(Route 742) are identified as the top two priorities in the Entrance Corridor Study. Two public hearings were held during the conduct of the study to receive public comments. In addition, a joint City Council/Planning Commission public hearing was held in February. (Several Albemarle County Planning Commission members and two Board of Supervisors attended the City's joint hearing.) Minutes of that meeting are included as Attachment B. The main concern expressed at this public hearing was the potential negative impact of road improvements on City neighborhoods. The County Planning Commission does not plan to hold a separate public hearing on the Study. KELLERCO will make it's fmal presentation of conclusions and recommendations to the MPO Policy Committee in May. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the study and forward to the MPO Policy Committee. ~., Is ~~ŒUW~." ", -~".:-"-/_.---"",-'" : ~~n ,', 9 ~ 95.047 ¡ATTACHMENT AI JOINT CITY - COUNTY STUDIES SOUTHERN CHARLOTTESVILLE TRANSPORTATION STUDY AND ENTRANCE CORRIDOR STUDY This Public Hearing Is Intended to describe technical findings developed regarding the Southern Charlottesville Transportation and Entrance Corridor Studies. These two separate but coordinated studies involved both the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County. Two previous public hearings have been held to receive comments regarding these studies. SOUTHERN CHARLOTTESVILLE TRANSPORTATION STUDY This study was confined to the area Indicated in exhibit ES1. To establish the existing situation, 1993 AM/PM peak hour turning movements were obtained at 12 key intersections and the level of service (LOS) was determined at each intersection. Altematlve additional roadway links were first identified by Gloeckner, Smith and Coleman, Inc. Two roadway links north of 1-64 (D and E) and two roadway links south of 1-64 (A and C2) were then selected by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for a detailed assessment of Mure 2015 AM/PM peak hour conditions at the same 12 key intersections. Exhibit ES4 shows the Mure road link alternatives evaluated. In order to establish the most meaningful basis for the Mure evaluation of the alternative roadway links, COMSIS updated the current regional travel demand model to the year 2015. This allowed a detailed assessment of the two most critical alternative roadway links A and C2 Plan - and associated Intersection improvements -in the Southern Charlottesville sub-area to be made on the basis of 2015 AM/PM peak hour travel demand model projections for the same 12 intersections analyzed for 1993. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS In consideration of these findings, the following actions are recommended: 1. Adopt Alternatives A, D and E as important east-west elements of the CIty-County comprehensive plans. See ES12 2. Adopt for long range planning purposes the intersection Improvements associated with the Alternative A roadway analyses for 2015 as summarized below: · Signalize locations 4 and 5 at the Fifth St/l-64 interchange and upgrade this Interchange to include 1) two lane off ramps 2) separate right turn lanes southbound at location 4 and northbound at location 5 3) a third lane southbound on the bridge over 1-64 and 4) coordinated signals. · Signalize location 10 at Elliott Ave and Monticello Ave and re-paint Monticello Ave for four lanes. · Provide separate right turn lanes northbound and southbound on Fifth St and Ridge St at Cherry Ave; and remove on-street parking on the east side of Ridge St north of Cherry Ave. 3. Monitor the peak period traffic situation on Monticello Ave at 1) Elliott Ave to Insure that signaiizatlon is provided and the pavement re-painted when warranted and at 2) Carlton Rd to assess the impact of increased corridor traffic (via Carlton Rd) and potential signalization at Monticello Ave. ENTRANCE CORRIDOR STUDY 2 . . ENTRANCE CORRIDOR STUDY This study focused on the eight (8) designated Charfottesville area entrance corridors as shown In exhibit ES1. For each of the eight corridors. current access/traffic operational features were identified for both City and County roadway sections. Overall corridor constraints and opportunities were then identified to Include special studies performed and anticipated Improvements. ENTRANCE CORRiDOR CONDiTiONS/FUTURE NEEDS Year 2015 entrance corridor conditions were then summarized. The corridors were then prforitlzed on the basis of the needs identified with the concurrence of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) as shown In Exhibit ES11 and listed below. Prioritv of Need Entrance Corridor No 1st ivy Rd/Rt 250 (3) 3 2nd Avon St/Rt 742 (3) Monticello Ave/Rt 20 (3) 6 3rd 7 4th Fontaine Ave/Jefferson Park Ave (2) 4 5th East High St/Rt 250 East (2) 8 6th Barracks Rd (1) 2 7th 5th St/Ridge St/Rt 631 (1) Rt 29 North/Emmet St (1) 5/5a 8th 1 (1) corridors significantly upgraded by recentfon-going improvements (2) corridors partially upgraded by recent improvements (3) corridors that have not undergone recent improvements Note that three of the entrance corridors No. 5/5a; 6 and 7 are within the Southern Charfottesville Transportation Study area (see Exhibit ES1). Also note that two of these corridors NO.6 Avon St and No. 7 Monticello Ave/Rt 20 are rated 2nd and 3rd in the rating. The third corridor, No. 5/5a was rated 7th due to its physical features, available capacity and planned upgrading south of 1-64. In addition to this assessment of entrance corridors by KELLER CO, draft corridor design standards were developed by Land Design Research International, Inc. to include entrance corridor guidelines for the following elements: · Lot configuration · Buildup · Access · Parking · Green space · Heritage · Natural environment · Free standing signs · Building signs · Landscaping · Screening · Architecture · Streetscape 3 This report Is available for use by City and County staff to help achieve appropriate and coordinated design standards In each corridor. CONCLUSIONS This study resulted in the identification of specific corridors which are considered to need attention regarding enhanced aesthetics, traffic operational efficiency and access management. Priority Entrance Corridors 1st Ivy Rd/At 250 from Ednam Forest to Rt 29 2nd Avon St/Rt 742 from Rt 20 to Belmont Ave Bridge - 3rd Monticello Ave/Rt 20 from Rt 742 to Avon St at Monticello Ave 4th Fontaine Ave/Jefferson Park Ave from Buckingham Circle to Emmet St/Jefferson Ave In consideration of the short and long range issues identified in the Southern Chariottesville Study which included all of these corridors except the Ivy Rd/Rt 250 corridor, the following actions are recommended. 1. Develop conceptual corridor plans for each of the four corridors to insure shortjlong range access management and corridor traffic operational efficiency. Apply the lOR guidelines and the CIty- County Urban Bikeway Plan guidelines as appropriate. 2. Monitor peak period traffic conditions along the emerging Avon St/Rt 742 corridor to Insure that speed limits are properiy established; and also carefully review all site plans/road improvements to insure they conform with the recommendations in the Southern Chariottesville Study and details developed in the conceptual corridor plan. 3. Adopt appropriate elements of each conceptual corridor plan into the appropriate comprehensive plans to insure implementation. Exhibit ES12 graphically summarizes the recommendations for both City-County studies. 4 , ~ , ENTRANCE CORRIDORS [!J ROUTE 29 NORTHIEMMET STREET FROM: WOODBROOK S.C NORTH OF RIO ROAD TO: ROUTE 250 AT IVY ROAD (Nom: VOOT PRELIMINARY PiAN SHEETS FOR WIDENING ROUTE 29 TO SIX LANES PLUS RIGHTTIJRN LANES wn.L BE REVIEWED; NOlE ALSO 1HE COUNTY HAS SUBMITIED A LANDSCAPING Pl.AN TO VOOT) ~ BARRACKS ROAD FROM: HUNlWOOD LANE TO: ROUTE 29 AT EMMET STREET (Nom: VOOT CONS'lRucnON PlAN SHEETS wn.L BE REVIEWED) [!J IVY ROAD/ROUTE 250 FROM: BOARS HEAD INN AT EDNAM FOREST TO: ROUTE 29 AT EMMET STREET (Nom: SEE LEWIS MT - UNIVERSITY HEIGlITS NEIGHBORHOOD STIIDY OF ocr, 1989) [:J FONTAINE AVE - JEFFERSON PARK AVE FROM: BUCKJNGHAM CIRCLE WEST OF ROUTE 29 BY-PASS INTERCHANGE TO: EMMET STREET AND JEFFERSON PARK AVE , i í """1"- ~ 713') .~ ;. 5th STREET - RIDGE STREET FROM: WEST MAIN STREET TO: SOUTH OF 1-64 INTERCHANGE C!ì .,!~ ..., .~~... '- ROUTE 631 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FROM: SOUTH OF 1-64 INTERCHANGE TO: END OF RE-AUGNMENT PROJECT ON ROUTE 631 (REVIEW PER VDOT CONSIRucnON PLAN SHEETS) MONTICELLO AVE/ROUTE 20 FROM: ROUTE 742 (AVON STREET) TO: AVON STREET AT MONTICELLO AVE EAST HIGH STREET/ROUTE 250 EAST FROM: HUNTERS WAY EAST OF 1-64 TO: 9th STREET (Nom: SECTION UNDER CONSIRUCTION wn.L INa.UDE REVIEW OF VOOT PI.AN SHEETS; ALSO NOTE 1HE COUNTY HAS SUBMITTED A LANDSCAPING PLAN TO VDOT) -.-.-.- STUDY AREA: SOUTHERN CHARLOTTESVILLE TRANSPORTATION STUDY AVON STREET - ROUTE 742 FROM: ROUTE 20 TO: BELMONT AVE BRIDGE ~ [!J ~ [!I J - \\,.~ . ,', ......, "" ' """"- " . .., ............. ~ ----- ,ç ;" -~...~ -~ \ \ "' . :.'l -- .ø'/ --- -; .; --- - .- - .. CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE AND ALBEMARLE COUNTY STUDY AREA ENTRANCE CORRIDORS AND STUDY UMITS Exhibit ES1 KELLERCO " DENOTE::; TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLED BY 2015 FOR HCM ANALYSIS ,-, , ..~ " ...... So\.fO"'E.~t4 ...... w-~- ----;--~~~ "- A 81 C2 * DENOTES LOCATION WHERE PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS WERE ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE 2015 HCM ANALYSIS FONTAINe AYE Exhibit ES4 FUTURE ROAD UNK AL TERNA T1VES EV ALUA TED KELLERCO ~ ........................... ......-.......-............ ...... .............. ......-.................... ........................... CO¡¡ÎÂê4j'fj REG.\RDING' UPGRADING , .. ...............-..--...... .................... ·············20·15········ .... ........ /âÊRvlê~\ ....---.-................. i/ÓlûME ~D· ······..··..··..···1....· i:·!.i!~þ'.l.... ..: :~~I.: ..... ,...................... ............................. ................-...--.--.... ...-........... ............ ............................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................. ...........-............................................... /ASSUMEO< .....--..- ....--,.,......... \'2015'\\:? ROÄÖWIDTtf ... 1!IY!l61r.1 ·:U~~~·~··,~i!r··VOWME·CHANGE, 199ó2ö15 !.:!~!il!!!:I;::::¡¡:m!·II!!.i!i!¡i¡¡li!!!!!¡¡¡..¡¡¡¡¡:¡:¡·:¡Ii!t!:·:!!!!:;::¡·;:;::::::,:",.,....:,,:,:::::: :ÓFNEED(eíTRANCECORFUOORS))':':/::))'\"'}:;';\"" SIGNIFICANTLY UPGRADED CORRIDORS 2015 PROJECTIONS INCLUDES MEADOW CREEK Pt<:NY EXTENDED FROM RIO RD NORTH TO ROUTE 29; AND WESTERN BYPASS AN UPGRADED INTERCHANGE MAY BE WARRANTED THE CITY ROADWAY SECTION IS DEFICIENT ON THIS HIGH CAPACITY CORRIDOR BOTH HIGH ST AND ROUTE-250 CORRIDORS REQUIRE UPGRADING COUNlY SECTION SUFFICIENT BUT CITY SECTION NOT SUFFICIENT CITY/COUN1Y SECTIONS SUFFICIENT WIDENING WARRANTED EXCESS CAPACITY WIDENING WARRANTED ON HIGH ST 4 LANE DIVIDED NEEDS TO BE UPGRADED ON ROUTE 250 .62 .73 1.02 1.64 1.30 0.86 .50 1.02 .78 1.97 1.71 0.63 0.65 1.22 1.79 2.56 2.26 1.47 1.03 65000 65000 58000 27500 27500 27500 27500 27500 27500 18000 14000 27500 27500 14000 14000 27500 27500 27500 27500 8 LANES DIVIDED 8 LANES DIVIDED 6 LANES DIVIDED 4 LANES DIVIDED 4 LANES DIVIDED 4 LANES DIVIDED 4 LANES DIVIDED 4 LANES DIVIDED 4 LANES DIVIDED 3 LANES 2 LANES 4 LANES DIVIDED 4 LANES DIVIDED 2 LANES 2 LANES LANES DIVIDED 5 LANES LANES DIVIDED LANES DIVIDED 4 4 4 NEARLY ALL SECTIONS OF THE CORRIDOR WARRANT UPGRADING ROUTE 250 CORRIDOR UPGRADING WARRANTED 1.27 1.66 1.22 1.39 1.71 18000 18000 18000 27500 18000 3 LANES 3 LANES 3 LANES 4 LANES DIVIDED 3 LANES EXCESS CAPACITY IS MISLEADING DUE TO VARIATION IN CROSS-SECTlONS EXCESS CAPACITY .50 .76 27500 14000 4 LANES DIVIDED 2 LANES DIVIDED + PARKING POTENTIAL SUB-AREA GROWTH NOT INCLUDED IN MODEWNG PROCESS COULD CREATE MORE DEFICIENCIES SECTION TO NORTH TOWARDSIIN CITY . NEEDS UPGRADING IF TRAFFIC IS DIVERTED FROM ROUTE 250 (EAST) DEFICIENCIES WOULD INCREASE CORRIDOR SUFFICIENT EXCEPT NEAR EWOTT AVE CHERRY AVE NORTH OF 1-64 1.56 1.12 1.26 .85 .53 .80 2.34 .80 0.65 .29 11200 11200 14000 14000 14000 11200 11200 27500 14000 14000 2 LANES + PARKING 2 LANES + PARKING 2 LANES 2 LANES 2 LANES 2 LANES + PARKING 2 LANES + PARKING 4 LANES DIVIDED 2 LANES 2 LANES 48100 58100 +10000 +20.7% 0.8% 48500 64400 +15.900 +32.8% 1.3% 50700 71100 +20.400 +40.2% 1.6% 40100 55600 +15500 +38.7% 1.5% 30900 38500 + 7600 +24.6% 0.9% 23600 26500 +2900 +12.3% 0.5% - 11900 17900 +6000 +50.4% 2.0% 25500 28000 +2500 +9.8% 0.4% 17900 27400 +9500 +53.1 % 2.1 % - - 22300 33800 + 11500 +51.6% 2.1 % 15400 22500 + 7100 +46.1 % 1.8% 9300 17600 +8300 +89.2% 3.6% 6600 17000 +10.400 +157.6% I 6.3% - - 12300 16700 +4400 +35.8% 1.4% 16200 22900 +6700 +41.4% 1.7% 37900 47000 +9100 +24.0% 0.9% 28800 58400 +29600 +102.8% 4.1% 23700 40700 +1700 +71.7% 2.9% 19600 28400 +8800 +44.9% 1.8% - - 14300 26000 + 11700 +81.8% 3.3% 15800 18900 +3100 +19.6% 0.8% 9500 19000 +9500 +100.0% 4.0% 22200 39900 +17700 +79.7% 3.2% 16500 32900 +16400 +99.4% 3.9% - 8700 13100 +4400 +50.6% 2.0% 8100 10100 +2000 +24.7% 0.9% - 12300 17200 +4900 +4O'Xo + 1.6'Xo CITY 7600 12500 +4900 +65% +2.6'Xo CrTY 10500 16700 +6200 +59.0% 2.4% 7200 11300 +4200 +56.9% 2.3% 5100 7300 +2100 +43.1% 1.7% - 6400 9100 +2700 +42.4% 1.7% 17200 25200 +8000 +46.5% 1.9% 11800 23100 +11300 +95.8% 3.8% 4600 9400 +4800 +104.3% 4.2% 2000 4500 +2500 +125.0% 5.0% 1 ROUTE 29 NORTHIEMMET STREET FROM: WOODBROOK S.C. NORTH OF RIO ROAD TO: ROUTE 250 AT IVY ROAD - 2 BARRACKS ROAD FROM: HUNTWOOD LANE TO: ROUTE 29 AT EMMET STREET - 5 5th STREETIRIDGE STREET FROM: WEST MAIN STREET TO: SOUTH OF 1-64 INTERCHANGE Sa ROUTE 631 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FROM: SOUTH OF 1-64 INTERCHANGE TO: END OF RE-AUGNMENT PROJECT ON Rr 631 - PARTIALLY UPGRADED CORRIDOR 8 EAST HIGH STREETIROUTE 250 EAST FROM: HUNTERS WAY EAST OF 1-64 TO: 9th STREET !!NCHANGED CORRIDORS 3 IVY ROADIROUTE 250 FROM: BOARS HEAD INN AT EDNAM FOREST TO: ROUTE 29 AT EMMET STREET - 4 FONTAINE AVENUE/JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE FROM: BUCKINGHAM CIRCLE WEST OF ROUTE 29 BYPASS INTERCHANGE TO: EMMET STREET AND JEFFERSON PARK AVE - 8 AVON STREETIROUTE 742 TO: ROUTE 20 FROM: BELMONT AVENUE BRIDGE - 7 MONTICELLO AVENUEJROUTE 20 FROM: ROUTE 742 (AVON STREET) TO: AVON STREET AT MONTICElLO AVENUE 81h 81h 7th 5th 1.t 4th 2nd 3rd MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR CATS AREA IS 'C' EXCEPT FOR THE AREA BOUNDED BY EMMET ST, Rr 250 BYPASS, RT 250 AND 1-64 (SEE PAGE 32 IN CATS 2000 PLAN) !.I t ES11 Exhib 2015 ENTRANCE CORRIDOR NEEDS KELLERCO 12.5 = 2015 AM LOSIPM LOS LEGEND: LOS A 5.0/8 REMOVE ON-STREET PARKING DEVELOP/ADOPT CONCEPTUAL CORRIDOR PLAN MONITOR PEAK PERIOD TRAFFIC; AND REVIEW "- SITE PLANS ~ --r---............ ADOPT ALTERNATIVE D ADOPT ALTERNATIVE A " ~. ,---- . DEVELOP/ADOPT CONCEPTUAL CORRIDOR PLAN I DEVELOP/ADOPT CONCEPTUAL CORRIDOR PLAN ffT 25O/lvY RD Exhibit ES12 SUMMARY OF JOINT CITY-COUNTY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS KELLERCO I ATTACHMENT 81 .. ¡UTES OF THE J CHARLOT::..SVlLLE PLANNING COMMISSION 5ùun1'íI~(t TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1995 - 7:30 P.M. ¡\ \J 'V l LL ~ CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS L- n . " ) 0.-::::; 'SîL\O-, ~\¿ The Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission was held this date with the following me~ present: CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Ms. Virginia Daugherty Rev. Alvin Edwards Ms. Kay Slaughter Mr. David Toscano Mr. Tom Vandever ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Satyendra Singh Huja, Director of Planning and Community Development Mr. Gary O'Connell, Deputy City Manager Mr. Craig Brown, Deputy City Attorney Ms. Doretha Shannon, Supt. of Schools Mr. Ron Higgins, Senior Planner Ms. Donna Shaunesey, Grants CPoordinator Ms. Claudette Grant, Grants Analyst Members of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission and Staff Mr. Gib Akin Mr. Blake Caravati, Chair Ms. Nancy Damon Mr. William Harris Mr. Herman Key Ms. Meredith Richards Mr. Stan Tatum A Mr. Caravati called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. and called for items from the' public not on the agenda. He also explained the agenda items and joint public hearing procedures. Finally, he welcomed members of the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission and Planning Staff who are here as part of the Joint Public Hearing on Southern Charlottesville. A. MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC NOT ON THE FORMAL AGENDA There were none B. MINUTES 1. January 10, 1995 - Regular Meeting 2. January 12, 1995 - Special Meeting 3. January 18, 1995 - Work Session 4. January 26, 1995 - Work Session 5. January)l, 1995 - Work Session Mr. Tatum offered corrections to page 1 and 10 of the January to, 1995 minutes and Ms. Richards noted a correction to page 1 of the January 18, 1995 minutes. On a motion by Mr. Akin, seconded by Ms. Damon, the five sets of minutes were approved -1- unanimously with Mr. Harris ê and Mr. Key abstaining from January 31, 1995 minutes. ,;,. . from voting on the January 31, 1995 minutes ,& on the January 12, 1995, January 26, 1995 and Mr. Caravati then opened the Joint Public Hearing for the purpose of considering item #1. C. JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Southern Charlottesville TransDortation and Entrance Corridor Study: This traffic study, conducted by Kellerco, Inc., on behalf of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPŒ, YOOT, the County of Albemarle and the City of Charlottesville; incorporates the southern half of the City of Charlottesville and the urban area of Albemarle County, south of the City. The study also includes the following major corridors to the City and County: Ivy Road; Avon Street; Monticello Avenue (Route 20); Fontaine Avenue/Jefferson Park Avenue; East High Street;Route 250 East; Barracks Road; Fifth Street;RidgelRoute 631, and; Emmet Street;Route 29. The consultant evaluated present and projected traffic conditions in the area and made a number of recommendations to improve traffic flow in the study area. Among alternatives evaluated were: connector roads from Route 20 to Avon Street to Fifth Street; an interchange at 1-64 and Avon Street; a parallel road to West Main Street, and; various intersection improvements. ,y ~'( ~ 1 \'. .. Mr. Caravati called for the staff report. Mr. Huja gave the staff report as follows: A -He described the scope of the study and the work that has been done since June of 1992. -He pointed out that there are three major elements to the study. First, was the recalibration of the traffic model and update of the data to Year 2015. Secondly, there is the traffic study of the Southern half of the City and the urban area of the County. Finally, there is an evaluation of eight entrance corridors in the City and County. -He introduced Mr. Richard Keller, of Kellerco, to make the presentation of the findings of the consultant team. Mr. Richard Keller, of Kellerco, Inc., the lead consultant of this study, gave a presentation of the findings of this study and included a summary of their recommendations. The major points he made in his talk were as follows: -He described the three parts of the study effort as indicated by Mr. Huja in his introduction. -He outlined the public meetings that were held to initially gather suggestions and comments for areas that might need attention and finally to hear comments on the findings and preliminary recommendations. -He described the process used by COMSIS for updating the transportation model to Year 2015 forecast data. ·2· J ~ ~ '- " ~~. '.' ., ~. :w. ,1: \..: r; . l: ~ H .~ ~ ., 11\ I ~ p. .' ~ ~ , .' . ',.... , ,··1 '\ I'{ L2' ¡;'. ¡ ~." "1.< Ih tr. ¡ . 1;.'" ,.- -He outlined some short ter' ~ term issues that the City and County should be watching as they implemel ;nts of their plan and recommendations in this study. -He gave a detailed description of each recommendation, including the need to develop plans and monitor the entrance corridors and guide development along them using the design guidelines provided as part of this study. Mr. Key asked Mr. Keller whether neighborhood impacts for his recommendation were considered. Mr. Keller responded by indicating that one of the criteria used in evaluating alternatives included neighborhood issues. Ms. Richards asked if the study anticipates the significant subdivision development occurring south of the City in Albemarle County. Mr. Keller explained that the forecast data includes this. Mr. Maurice Cox of 702 Ridge Street, read a statement regarding the Ridge Street Neighborhoods concern about traffic "improvements" that will negatively impact their neighborhood. He said the removal of on-street parking along the east sid~ of Ridge Street is the equivalent of widening that street to "highway standards". He asked that the recommendations be changed to leave Ridge Street at two lanes of traffic only with parking on street. Mr. Lawrence Burruss of 1201 Avon Street, spoke as a owner of a business on the 'southern parkway" and on Avon Street in opposition to any interchange at Avon Street and 1-64. He spoke in favor of the easVwest connector between Route 20 South and 5th Street, SW. He suggested some modifications to }he location of the eastern portion of the connector road to Route 20. Ms. Darcy Phillips of 703 Bolling Street, spoke of her concerns about changes to Monticello Avenue to "repaint" it into a kind of four lane configuration. She did speak in favor of traffic signals at the intersections of Elliott Avenue and Monticello Avenue and Carlton Road and Monticello Avenue. t'·':: E~ [.' ¡-. it ¡ \ ~ ; ¡ f ¡. ¡ . f Mr. Eugene Williams of 620 Ridge Street, spoke of his concerns about traffic improvements that tend to destroy neighborhoods like Ridge Street. He said that history shows us that it is the African American neighborhoods where highways, hospitals, schools and other public facilities are built at the expense of the neighborhood. Mr. Kevin Lynch of 609 Locust Avenue, observed that the population increases have largely been in the County with job increases in the City. He noted that many people who do not live in the City but work here do so at the expense of City residents by creating traffic through our neighborhood. He suggested that more ways be found to have people who want to live as well as work in Charlottesville. There being no further comments, Mr. Caravati closed the Joint Public Hearing and called for Planning Commission discussion. -3- h' " .'. <'e 'f) ,. .... 1- ~ Mr. Harris asked Mr. Keller ' ," .;rnatives to road construction or improvements were considered. Mr. KellE: .. ,at they looked primarily at traffic improvements, but the entrance corridor portion looked at other issues, but not necessarily other modes of travel. Mr. Harris then asked how we could project into the twenty-first century using only traffic data. Mr. Keller said that other alternatives should be considered in developing your local Comprehensive Plans. Mr. Harris said that he is concerned about this as it is a short cited approach to comprehensive transportation planning. Mr. Keller said that the recommendations which calls for looking at the conceptual corridor planning are intended to foster this broader approach. .~ ~ " ~: . .~ Mr. Harris said that the City cannot regulate urban growth in the County, but we can make decisions about roads in the City. He suggested that a more cooperative planning process is needed so that the 'villages' of the County plan happen where it makes sense in the region and with a road network planned along with other transportation modes and improvements that do not negatively impact existing neighborhoods. ~, ~ .. ~ ~ ~ Mr. Huja mentioned that the MPO Transit Development Plan and the CATS Študy are designed to be more comprehensive in addressing other modes of transportation. There was a discussion on this and how bus traffic has relatively little effect on the demand models in the forecasting. í ~ " There was a discussion on the recommendations regarding Ridge Street with Mr. Keller explaining that this was merely identified as a short-term issue with a possible long term improvement recommendation. He said that it would likely only be needed for a short distance and even then only during peak hours. Ms. Richards suggested that it might be an awkward thing to have parking removed on a residential street only during peak hours. Mr. Caravati asked if Mr. Keller had any specific recommendations for changing 'single access subdivisions' to provide for alternative access points serving them. Mr. Keller said that this is mainly aimed at future development but he acknowledge that in the future some of the single access subdivisions that exist now may have difficulty getting out onto Avon Street. Mr. Keller said that he would then recommend that large neighborhoods have more than one option for access. There was discussion on this. Ms. Damon commented that this study appeared to be set up to see how to move traffic and many City residents are concerned about their neighborhoods becoming thru-ways. Mr. Bill Nitchman, a member of the Albemarle County Planning Commission, asked about the land uses that were used in the models. Mr. Juandiego Wade, Transportation Planner for the County, explained that the current land use patterns and the land use plan designations were used to develop a likely scenario for uses in the 2015 projections. Mr. Nitchman said that significant changes may be made that would affect this forecasting. Mr. Wade said that this could then be run through the model once the -4- . .., changes are agreed upon to see what effect it would have on the members. There was discussion on this with Mr. Wayne Cilimberg, County Planning Director, and Mr. Huja explaining that the County and City Planning Staffs work together in providing the land use projections based on a likely "build out" potential. Mr. Harris asked what density is being anticipated along Route 631 south of the City limits. Mr. Keller said that the model is not showing great volumes on the southern links there, but he does not know off hand what the density projections are for that section of the road way. He said that this could be provided if needed. Mr. Harris said that he would like to not see the roads determine the density. '~.j Mr. Vandever said that he is concerned about traffic on Avon Street and asked why the interchange was dispensed with so quickly. Mr. Huja said that the City and County both asked that this interchange at Avon and 1-64 be included in the study so that we can see once and for all what impacts it could have on traffic. Mr. Keller said that there is great cost in constructing such an interchange including some hidden cost that are not detailed for work that would probably have to happen along 1-64. He said this cost is not balanced in terms of any significant contributions to traffic improvements from neighborhood corridors as well as the easVwest connectors. Mr. Tatum said that he continues to be concerned about traffic movement solutions that bring more vehicles to our neighborhoods. He cited the "if we build it they will come" principal as something history has shown us. Mr. Akin said that we need to have more conversation~ with the County in taking some of the issues from this study and carrying them forward. There was discussion on this with Mr. Harris saying that we need to expand the discussions and the study to include housing, economics, and circulation impacts as well as quality of life issues in neighborhoods. Mr. Caravati opened the Joint Public Hearing for the purpose of considering item #2. 2. City of Charlottesville Capital Improvement Program (CIP) FY'1995-2000: The Planning Commission is soliciting the public for comments on the proposed Capital Improvement Program for fiscal years 1995-1996 through 1999-2000. The program areas included in the CIP are: Education; Public Safety; Parks and Recreation; Neighborhood Improvements; Transportation and Access; Utilities and Services, and; General Government,/Buildings. The recommendations of the Capital Improvement Committee are also being reviewed. Mr. Caravati called for the staff report. Mr. Huja gave the staff report as follows: -He briefly explained the process which has been followed in devßloping this recommended list of Capital Improvement Program projects through fiscal year 2000. -He pointed out that an initial public hearing was held prior to revising the CIP and that this public hearing is designed to hear comments on the proposed projects for this. -5- I David P. Bowennan Charlo! tesvllle COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296·5800 ('!l.n II'''; ~ r--1.\! 1:11 Charlotte Y Humphns Jack Jouett \\',\;!I'! I 1)('1 klf\", II Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. ScotlsvilJe fi JrlflT1I.I'-. MEMO TO: Jo Higgins, Director of Engineering FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ~é- DATE: April 5, 1995 SUBJECT: Road Resolution - Lanford Hills Subdivision Attached is the original resolution (plus three copies) adopted by the Board on April 5, 1995, requesting acceptance of Lanford Drive in Lanford Hills Subdivision into the State Secondary System of Highways. EWC:len Attachments (4) * Printed on recycled paper The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virgin- ia, in regular meeting on the 5th day of April, 1995, adopted the following resolution: RES 0 L UTI 0 N WHEREAS, the street in Lanford Hills describ~g~n the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated April 5, 1995, fully incorporated herein by reference, is shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the Board that the street meets the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Reauirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transpor- tation to add the road in Lanford Subdivision as described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated April 5, 1995, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Reauire- ments; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the recorded plats; and FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. * * * * * Recorded vote: Moved by: Mrs. Humphris Seconded by: Mr. Bowerman Ayes: Mr. Martin, Mr. Perkins, Mrs. Thomas, Mr. Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris and Mr. Marshall. Nays: None A Copy Teste: The road described on Additions Form SR-5{A) is: 1) Lanford Drive from the edge of pavement of state Route 649, 990 lineal feet to the end of the cul-de-sac as shown on plat recorded 5-13-91 in Deed Book 1153, pages 361-363, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, showing a 50 foot right-of- way and additional drainage easement recorded in Deed Book 1454, pages 447-449, for a total length of 0.19 mile. Total mileage - 0.19 mile +I § 0 u tI) >t ~ ~I H I%: ... c þ! ~I E C .... -= ~ tI) .. m I!r. j C 0 ... .Q " :: .... i5 I") < .( E-< ~ tI) <-i) >t tI) ~ >t ~ ii fà ~ 0 u -= þ! .. tI) ~ þ! i5 ] ;., 0 ~ E-< ~ tI) 0 z 0 H C E-< c H :s Q 1 ~ ¡::.:: ~ In Q .... þ! c .... tI) °Ë .,.. 0 I%: ø. ~ 0 JJ 'tJ ¡::.:: ... ~ ø. c 0 "CI I . .. ¡: " III ,8 ..:¡ .( ~ .. 10 ~ ¡: I 0 ø: -a .,.. tI) c In !! 'r! ~ c > .:01 .,.. 0 ~ 'tJ I!r. -§ ~ tI) s tI) z 0 -= I . H .. 0 E-< j H C Q ... ~ ~ ~ < z ."" ~ c~! .. :§ .. .. -= .. U 0\ .CI .... ¡ . 0 ~ ~ c ò c ~ :c ~~ ] .- -0 C .!! m :c 1 III .... C c .... Z .,.. [! 11 :II ~ ~ I! .... III = r~ +I .. ~ . ~ 0 E-< ;¡~ i- ~1 ~~ ¢~ I;¡ ¡::.::.CI :i ~ :~ ~ ~ .. ! E-o c ,) § c ;: ! I I I :a ] "CI ï < ~ í: i ~ ï ï J ï ~ Ii ~ ~ J J .,; ~ I ~ :¡:; !. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ë ! ~ J J I I J '" ~ 1 Io 1 1 1 1 ¡; l ¡; l ¡; l ¡; l ¡; l ¡.. ¡.. ¡.. ¡.. ¡.. c l! > .,.. .. ~ ~ Q ... c 'tJ .. ~ ~ 0 Z I . ¡: III ..:¡ ...: . .. c ¡::.::Z - ... .., .. '" .....: ...: :::>; '-,': GJ :::'\; :i::: ." ......: ..r¡ .¡ 01/1 o~ .; ] ~ ~ ... I .. ~ ~ .. i .( ¡¡ t:: ~ .8 to .( " i I!r. ã! 0 j z i 0 H 15 E-< ... ~ .. c ~ .. ~ H "§ ... "CI 'ü H .s Þ'i E-< .. ø: ;., þ! ... c " U ~ 1: ..:. !. i' , " ~ ... ã! c ~ ~ .. O¡ U .f 1 15 ~ .. ] § u ~ t-' " ij ~ ~ '" . 3-,.3/-:?J :J1? t/ /¿J5. .7 :3 The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virgin- ia, in regular meeting on the 5th day of April, 1995, adopted the following resolution: RES 0 L UTI 0 N WHEREAS, the street in Lanford Hills described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated April 5, 1995, fully incorporated herein by reference, is shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the Board that the street meets the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Reauirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transpor- tation to add the road in Lanford Subdivision as described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated April 5, 1995, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Require- ments; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the recorded plats; and FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. * * * * * Recorded vote: Moved by: Seconded by: Yeas: Nays: A Copy Teste: Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC # The road described on Additions Form SR-5(A) is: 1) Lanford Drive from the edge of pavement of state Route 649, 990 lineal feet to the end of the cul-de-sac as shown on plat recorded 5-13-91 in Deed Book 1153, pages 361-363, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, showing a 50 foot right-of- way and additional drainage easement recorded in Deed Book 1454, pages 447-449, for a total length of 0.19 mile. Total mileage - 0.19 mile .. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE MAn ì 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: Ella Carey, Clerk of Board of Supervisors FROM: Peter Parsons, Civil Engineer " ~ ó~ DATE: RE: March 24, 1995 Lanford Hills Subdivision (SUB-90-154) The road serving the above referenced subdivision is substantially complete and ready for a VDOT acceptance inspection. Attached is the completed SR-5(A) form for a resolution, which I r.equest be taken to the Board for adoption at your next opportunity. Once the resolution has been adopted, date and sign the SR-5(A), and please provide me with the original and four copies. Thanks for your assistance. Please call me if you have any questions. PJPlctj Attachment 3- 3/-: :?s- /$¿;Jf/os: ~ COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION POBOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902·2013 March 22, 1995 A.G.TUCKER RESIDENT ENGINEER Current Projects Constnlct¡' ()n¡f~~"dltl9 , .--:~.~ . ¡~ ,''1 œ r¡ \1: :c; I ;""'":",,,,">-<.,,-J.?~__U 11 i'~: I . ,...""'........"..""'-,.~ ,-:','.__ . Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk Board of Supervisors County Office Building 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 .,., 3 t9æ L --,,,,, ,'"., rm OF ~t'o~,--, .......~-~..--._~, .; ¡' ;:.: ¡-~ ' Dear Ms. Carey: Attached find the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently under construction and the quarterly report of projects under design in Albemarle County. Please see that this information is forwarded to the Board of Supervisors members. I will be prepared to discuss this matter with them at the next meeting if they desire. Yours Truly, ~LvI A. G. Tucker ggu\ cc: Mr. R W. Tucker, Jr. w/attachment Mr. David Benish w/attachment TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Projects Under Construction Albemarle County April 1. 1995 Route Location Status Estimated No. Compo Date 29 From Hydraulic Rd. (Rte. 743) Construction 67% Complete Dec 95 To N. of Rio Road (route 631) ---- -- _.~-~_. * Revised Date ** New Project CURR. PREVo EST. ADV. ADV. CONST DATE DATE TIME ADV. 24 MO. O~99 1 24 MO. 10-96l 6MO. 6MO. ~\ o -97 12 MO. 07-97 12MO. 10-99 12 MO. 12-00 9MO. 04-01 6MO. ADV. 12 MO. 08-95 12 MO. 10-97 5MO. 10-96 9MO. 01-96 12 MO. 10-99 5MO. 10-98 12 MO. 9MO. PROJECT LISTING ALBEMARLE COUNTY APRIL 1,1995 ~ LOCATION - DESCRIPTION (I) : ~M RIO ROAD TO RIVANNA RIVER (W1DEN TO 6 LANES , (2) 29 S.FO RIVANNA RIV. TO AIRPORT RD.(WIDEN TO 6 LAN (3) 610 FROM RO E 20 TO 1.8 MI. E. RTE. 20 (GRAVEL ROAD) (4) 631 FROM GREEN IER DR. TO ROUTE 29 (5) 631 FROM ROUTE 743 GREENBRIER DR. I l' (6) 631 FROM NCL CH'VILLE TO X RR (RIO ROAD) MEAD~WCREEK R (7) 637 FROM ROUTE 635 TO 0.55 MI. RTE. 682 (GRAVi L ROAD) (8) 649 (9) 656 FROM ROUTE 654 TO ROUTE 743 (10) 671 (11) 682 FROMROUTE250T01.7MI.S.RTE. (12) 711 (13) 712 FROM ROUTE 29 TO ROUTE (14) 743 FROM ROUTE 657 (LAMBS R (15) 759 (16) 760 ( 17) 866 FROM ROUTE 712 TO ROUTE 29 (GRAV FROM ROUTE 743 TO ROUTE 1455 . INDICATES NEW PROJECT .. INDICATES REVISED DATE ADV. INDICATES THAT PROJECT HAS BEEN ADVERTISED REASONS FOR CHANGES IN ADVERTISEMENT DATES "\ , - COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE 3-3/-~J ~çV'::5'#~S;¿ MEMORANDUM FROM: r··"-'-_ Albemarle County Board of Supervisors ~~_Lt~_~ Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive ( 11J j ..~: R '995 L March 28 1995 , _'h_. '0 "RD OF SUP~:: -..'·'.....'.........,T_ '..-. TO: DATE: RE: 1993 Sales Ratio Study I have attached for your review a copy of the cover letter from our Finance Department indicating that our 1993 median sales ration was 96.6%. I believe this speaks very highly of the accuracy of our reassessment effort and know that you join me in congratulating the staff RWT,Jr/dbm 95.056 Attachment .. ~ C(!Lt:\~'~!'\{ ,'. . .;\;~;\ ~._{ LE f"' :~,- J) . ~ 1\ I \ \ MAR 14 1995 ! . h; \... ~~' , \ 'I. \1\ \, i ¡ f, !\ !) '!, \ i r·' . COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Finance 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Telephone (804) 296-5855 MEMORANDUM TO: Rick Huff, Deputy County Executive FROM: Robert J. Walters, Jr. ~ DATE: March 13, 1995 RE: 1993 Preliminary Sales Ratio Study The Preliminary 1993 Virginia Assessment/Sales Ratio Study has been released by the Virginia Department of Taxation. The 1993, a reassessment year, Median Ratio for Albemarle County was 96.6% with a Coefficient of Dispersion of 6.87%. The median ratio ranks 13th and the Coefficient ranks 11th compared to the 136 cities and counties analyzed in the study. This is exceptional considering the fact that 28 localities reassess annually. The ratio is the comparison of assessed values to the selling price of bona fide sales of real property. The coefficient evaluates the level of uniformity of the assessments. Attached is a copy of the historical summary for Albemarle County as well as the results and rankings for the other 135 localities. The regression index, another uniformity index, will not be available until the final results are released. Copy: Melvin Breeden Bruce Woodzell FAX (804) 972-4006 TOO (804) 972-4012 COUNTY OF Þ,U3·F~~.:\RLE rr""r-:--:~ ~. -', r;,'~" H¡; t~: ,>,. ' ~. t \, ¡ I " " ~:(' MAR! 4 1995 \ i ;\ '., "j, i '~1 t !i \ ¡ U I U Ü_" La ,..:.J EXECUTIVE OFFiCE ~ 3~.:3/-?Js- ?5 t/ ,f<"tl5: .5 £' 1994 THIRD QUARTER ~,=:-'---~ ~ f¡; ï0fS'- BUILDING REPORT' DJr"' h \ -~ <. County of Albemarle Department of Planning and Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5823 INDEX I. Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month (Charts A - B) II. Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Type (Charts C - D) IlL Comparison of All Building Permits (Chart E) ~ Comparison of Certificates of Occupancy (Charts F - H) Key to Types of Housing Used in this Report SF Single Family (Includes Modular) SF A Single Family Attached SF/fH Single Family Townhouse DUP Duplex MF Multi-Family Residence MHC MobileHomes in County ,. -2- During the third quarter of 1994, 150 permits were issued for 282 dwelling units. In addition, 9 permits were issued for mobile homes in existing parks at an average exchange value of $2,500 for a total of $22,500. I. COMPARISON OF NEW RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BY MONTH Chart A. Nine Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month YEAR 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 JAN 37 38 22 93 56 64 183 49 190 FEB 43 35 40 172 68 31 72 56 53 MAR 37 62 91 61 92 57 64 58 72 APR 78 70 71 49 82 62 72 76 69 MAY 73 73 83 89 75 44 62 45 60 JUN 92 56 83 220 85 54 48 79 70 JUL 159 80 30 67 42 58 62 81 186 AUG 32 46 49 74 87 58 126 116 49 SEP 49 45 46 72 90 55 48 45 47 OCT 52 60 52 56 48 39 43 68 0 NOY 50 49 60 301 37 42 49 65 0 DEC 35 40 46 55 42 50 37 67 0 TOTAL 737 654 673 1309 804 614 866 805 796 I Chart B. Three Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month I Chart B: Three Year Comparison of New Residential D.U. by Month I 200 CJ) 180 I- Z 160 ::) (!) 140 Z :J 120 .J ~ 100 C ~ 80 W z 60 L1.. 0 40 0 z 20 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTH III!IIiII 1992 II!IIiII 1993 11!11i111994 Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development -3- ~ THIRD QUARTER 1994 II. COMPARISON OF NEW RESID!;NTIAL DWELLING UNITS BY TYPE Chart C. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL % TOTAL DISTRICT SF SFA SFfTH DUP MF MHG D.U. D.U. CHARLOTTESVILLE 2 0 6 0 138 0 146 52% JACK JOUETT 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 2% RIVANNA 63 4 6 0 0 0 73 26% SAMUEL MILLER 8 1 0 1 0 2 12 4% SCOTTSVILLE 25 1 0 0 0 1 27 10% WHITE HALL 16 2 0 0 0 1 19 7% TOTAL 119 8 12 1 138 4 282 100% Chart D. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AREA DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL Sl- SI-A SFnH DUP MF MHG UNITS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 9 0 6 0 138 0 153 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 4 0 0 : 0 0 4 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 15 1 0 0 0 0 16 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CROZET COMMUNITY 4 2 0 0 0 0 6 HOLL YMEAD COMMUNITY 19 0 6. 0 0 0 25 SCOTTSVILLE COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EARL YSVILLE VILLAGE 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PINEY MOUNTAIN VILLAGE 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 RIVANNA VILLAGE 21 0 0 0 0 0 21 GROWTH AREA SUBTOTAL 71 8 12 0 138 1 230 RURAL AREA 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 RURAL AREA 2 14 0 0 0 0 0 14 RURAL AREA 3 9 0 0 1 0 1 11 RURAL AREA 4 10 0 0 0 0 2 12 RIIR.ð.1 .ð.R¡::.ð.~1 46 U U , U 3 52 TOTAL 119 8 12 1 138 4 282 Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development ~ -4- THIRD QUARTER 1994 III. COMPARISON OF ALL BUILDING PERMITS Chart E. Estimated Cost of Construction by Magisterial District and Construction Type MAGISTERIAL NEW "NEW NON-RES. NEW COMMERCIAL FARM BUILDING TOTAL DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL & ALTER. RES. & NEW INSTITUT. & ALTER. COMM. No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ CHVILLE 14 5,481,225 32 457,143 4 6,420,000 24 1.412,537 74 13,770.905 JOUETT 5 1,225,000 18 308,864 1 80,000 2 55,000 26 1,668,864 RIVANNA 73 9,587.060 49 627,890 3 1,200,000 14 802,187 139 12,217,137 S. MILLER 12 2,042,600 45 1,186,141 5 358,000 8 3,597,432 70 7.184,173 SCOTTSVILLE 27 3,326.947 43 535,730 1 10,000 5 23,150 76 3,895,827 WHITE HALL 19 2,037.251 60 956.287 5 112,000 8 106,300 92 3,211,838 TOTAL 150 23,700,083 247 4,072,055 19 8,180,000 61 5,996,606 477 41,948.744 . Additional value of mobile homes placed in existing parks is induded in Residential Alteration Category. IV. CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY Chart F. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Elementary School District and Dwelling Unit Type SCHOOL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL PERCENT DISTRICT SF SF A SFfTH DUP MF MHC D.U. TOTAL D.U. Agnor-Hurt 12 0 9 0 0 0 21 10.94% Broadus Wood/Henley 4 0 0 0 0 1 5 2.60% Broadus Wood/Jouett 3 0 0 0 0 1 4 2.08% Brownsville 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 2.60% Crozet 4 11 0 0 0 0 15 7.81% Greer 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.04% Hollymead 26 7 8 0 0 0 41 21.35% Meriwether Lewis 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 5.73% Murray 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 3.65% Red Hill 6 0 0 0 0 2 8 4.17% Cale/Burley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% CalelWalton 22 10 0 0 0 0 32 16.67% Scottsville 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.04% Stone Robinson/Burley 26 0 0 0 0 0 26 13.54% Stone RobinsonlWalton 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 3.13% Stony Point 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 2.60% Woodbrook 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Yancey 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1.04% TOTAL 142 28 17 0 0 5 192 100.00% Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development , -5- THIRD QUARTER 1994 IV. CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY (continued) Chart G. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL DISTRICT SF SFA SFfTH DUP MF MH(; CHARLOTTESVILLE 4 0 6 0 0 0 10 JACK JOUETT 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 RIVANNA 67 7 11 0 0 0 85 SAMUEL MILLER 21 3 0 0 0 0 24 SCOTTSVILLE 28 7 0 0 0 3 38 WHITE HALL 14 11 0 0 0 2 27 TOTAL 142 28 17 0 0 5 192 Chart H. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type CaMP PLAN AREA DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL SF ~t-A ~t-IIH DUP Mt- MH(; UNITS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 12 0 9 0 0 0 21 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 18 7 0 0 0 0 25 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 3 3 0 0 0 0 6 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 CROZET COMMUNITY 2 11 0 0 0 0 13 HOLLYMEAD COMMUNITY 24 0 8 0 0 0 32 SCOTTSVILLE COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EARL YSVILLE VILLAGE 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 PINEY MTN. VILLAGE 1 7 0 0 0 0 8 NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 RIVANNA VILLAGE 21 0 0 0 0 0 21 l:OKUVVI ¡UIAL 86 28 17 0 0 1 132 RURAL AREA 1 18 0 0 0 0 1 19 RURAL AREA 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 RURAL AREA 3 17 0 0 0 0 3 20 RURAL AREA 4 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 RIIRAI ARFA 56 0 0 0 0 4 60 TOTAL 142 28 17 0 0 5 192 Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development 3-3/~75- ~ .f?5:.~~'5.- '-~7 1994 FOURTH QUARTER BUILDING REPORT MAR 0 1995 ¡ -,.. "-~D OF SUpr.::p' -;-- "- '- ,,""---------.."':.- :':'.c>, County of Albemarle Department of Planning and Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesvllle, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5823 INDEX I. Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month (Charts A - B) II. Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Type (Charts C - D) IlL Comparison of All Building Permits (Chart E) œ Comparison of Certificates of Occupancy (Charts F - H) Key to Types of Housing Used in this Report SF Single Family (Includes Modular) SF A Single Family Attached SF/TH Single Family Townhouse DUP Duplex MF Multi-Family Residence MHC MobileHomes in County , -2- During the fourth quarter of 1994, 143 permits were issued for 143 dwelling units. In addition, 6 permits were issued for mobile homes in existing parks at an average exchange value of $2,500 for a total of $15,000. I. COMPARISON OF NEW RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BY MONTH Chart A. Nine Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month YEAR 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 JAN 37 38 22 93 56 64 183 49 190 FEB 43 35 40 172 68 31 72 56 53 MAR 37 62 91 61 92 57 64 58 72 APR 78 70 71 49 82 62 72 76 69 MAY 73 73 83 89 75 44 62 45 60 JUN 92 56 83 220 85 54 48 79 70 JUL 159 80 30 67 42 58 62 81 186 AUG 32 46 49 74 87 58 126 116 49 SEP 49 45 46 72 90 55 48 45 47 OCT 52 60 52 56 48 39 43 68 51 NOV 50 49 60 301 37 42 49 65 60 DEC .35 40 46 55 42 50 37 67 32 TOTAL 737 654 673 1309 804 614 866 805 939 Chart B. Three Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month ¡Chart B: Three Year Comparison of New Residential D.U. by Month I 200 C/) 180 t: 160 Z ::::I C> 140 Z :J 120 ...J ~ 100 0 ~ 80 w Z 60 u.. 0 40 0 Z 20 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTH 1l1li 1992 l1li 1993 l1li 1994 I Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development " -3- FOURTH QUARTER 1994 11. COMPARISON OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS Chart C. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL % TOTAL DISTRICT SF SFA SFfTH uut-' MI- MHI; D.U. D.U. CHARLOTTESVILLE 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 2% JACK JOUETT 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1% RIVANNA 54 11 9 0 0 1 75 52% SAMUEL MILLER 12 0 0 0 0 1 13 9% SCOTTSVILLE 29 2 0 0 0 3 34 24% WHITE HALL 10 2 0 2 0 3 17 12% TOTAL 109 15 9 2 0 8 143 100% Chart D. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AREA DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL UNITS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 10 0 9 0 0 0 19 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 9 2 0 0 0 0 11 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CROZET COMMUNITY 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 HOlL )'MEAD COMMUNITY 18 2 0 0 0 0 20 SCOTTS\(IL.LE COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EARL YSVILLE VilLAGE 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PINEY MOUNTAIN VILLAGE 0 9 0 0 0 0 9 RIVANNA VILLAGE 18 0 0 0 0 0 18 59 5 9 0 5 RURAL AREA 1 7 0 0 0 0 3 10 RURAL AREA 2 10 0 0 0 0 1 11 RURAL AREA 3 17 0 0 0 0 1 18 RURAL AREA 4 16 0 0 0 0 3 19 TOTAL 109 15 9 2 o 8 143 Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development \ -4- FOURTH QUARTER 1994 III. COMPARISON OF ALL BUILDING PERMITS Chart E. Estimated Cost of Construction by Magisterial District and Construction Type MAGISTERIAL NEW "NEW NON-RES. NEW COMMERCIAL FARM BUILDING TOTAL DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL & ALTER. RES. & NEW INSTITUT. & ALTER. CO MM. No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ CHVILLE 3 275,320 26 248,159 1 125,000 25 163,651 55 812,130 JOUETT 1 400,000 18 294,939 1 1,200 6 39,500 26 735.639 RIVANNA 75 8,490,385 51 827,771 4 553,670 12 3,611,000 142 13,482,826 S. MILLER 13 2,190,000 46 946,665 2 852,500 8 388,000 69 4,377,165 SCOTISVILLE 34 2,387,925 23 397,350 1 500 2 9,800 60 2,795,575 WHITE HALL 17 1,790,257 50 667,279 0 0 5 90,334 72 2,547.870 TOTAL 143 15,533,887 214 3,382,163 9 1,532,870 58 4,302,285 424 24,751,205 " Additional value of mobile homes placed in existing parks is included in Residential Alteration Category. IV. CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY Chart F. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Elementary School District and Dwelling Unit Type SCHOOL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL PERCENT DISTRICT SF SF A SFfTH DUP MF MHC D.U. TOTAL D.U. Agnor-Hurt 6 0 8 0 0 0 14 7.22% Broadus Wood/Henley 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.03% Broadus Wood/Jouett 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.55% Brownsville 3 0 0 0 2 0 5 2.58% Crozet 5 5 0 0 0 0 10 5.15% Greer 0 0 0 0 47 0 47 24.23% Hollymead 23 4 12 0 0 0 39 20.10% Meriwether lewis 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 3.09% Murray 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.03% Red Hill 3 0 0 o· 0 0 3 1.55% CalelBurtey 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% CalelWalton 17 4 0 0 0 0 21 10.82% Scottsville 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 2.06% Stone Robinson/Burley 3 0 0 0 0 1 4 2.06% Stone RobinsonlWalton 23 0 0 0 0 0 23 11.86% Stony Point 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 3.61% Woodbrook 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.03% Yancey 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1.03% TOTAL 111 13 20 0 49 1 194 100.00% Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development -5- FOURTH QUARTER 1994 IV. CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY (continued) Chart G. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL DISTRICT ~t' SFA SFfTH DUP MF MHC CHARLOTTESVILLE 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 JACK JOUETT 2 0 0 0 47 0 49 RIVANNA 60 4 18 0 0 0 82 SAMUEL MILLER 8 2 0 0 2 0 12 SCOTTSVILLE 26 2 0 0 0 1 29 WHITE HALL 14 5 0 0 0 0 19 TOTAL 111 13 20 0 49 1 194 Chart H. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type COMP PLAN AREA DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL UNITS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 6 0 8 0 0 0 14 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 15 2 0 0 0 0 17 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 0 0 0 0 47 0 47 CROZET COMMUNITY 2 5 0 0 0 0 7 HOLL YMEAD COMMUNITY 24 0 12 0 0 0 36 SCOTTS\(IL.LE COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EARL YSVILLE VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PINEY MTN. VILLAGE 1 4 0 0 0 0 5 NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVANNA VILLAGE 19 0 0 0 0 0 19 RURAL AREA 1 RURAL AREA 2 RURAL AREA 3 RURAL AREA 4 9 11 12 11 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 2 o o o o 1 9 11 14 12 TOTAL 111 13 20 o 49 194 Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development « 3 --3 / -fl.r ;?5 (,7f/.1_5. :;;p .1 1994 YEAR END BUILDING REPORT ,:,-'~-~ , I?o. r~ ¡f" ......""'~.,...........;:;-,;~. 6 QI rr '--- liD 0"" .. -.--".-..: r SUpI:'D' ,.. .., ·»~L.· County of Albemarle Department of Planning and Community Development 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 (804) 296-5823 INDEX I. Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month (Charts A - B) II. Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Type (Charts C - D) IlL Comparison of All Building Permits (Chart E) ~ Comparison of Certificates of Occupancy (Charts F - H) Key to Types of Housing Used in this Report SF Single Family (Includes Modular) SFA Single Family Attached SF/fH Single Family Townhouse DUP Duplex MF Multi-Family Residence MHC MobileHomes in County i '" -2- During the year of 1994,666 permits were issued for 939 dwelling units. In addition, 31 permits were issued for mobile homes in existing parks at an average exchange value of $2,500 for a total of $77,500. I. COMPARISON OF NEW RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BY MONTH Chart A. Nine Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month YEAR 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 JAN 37 38 22 93 56 64 183 49 190 FEB 43 35 40 172 68 31 72 56 53 MAR 37 62 91 61 92 57 64 58 72 APR 78 70 71 49 82 62 72 76 69 MAY 73 73 83 89 75 44 62 45 60 JUN 92 56 83 220 85 54 48 79 70 JUL 159 80 30 67 42 58 62 81 186 AUG 32 46 49 74 87 58 126 116 49 SEP 49 45 46 72 90 55 48 45 47 OCT 52 60 52 56 48 39 43 68 51 NOV 50 49 60 301 37 42 49 65 60 DEC 35 40 46 55 42 50 37 67 32 TOTAL 737 654 673 1309 804 614 866 805 939 Chart B. Three Year Comparison of New Residential Dwelling Units by Month ¡Chart B: Three Year Comparison of New Residential D.U. by Month I 200 C/) 180 I- Z 160 => " 140 Z ::¡ 120 ...J ~ 100 C ~ 80 Z 60 u.. 0 40 0 Z 20 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTH 1IIIIIIII1992 .1993 .19941 Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development , . -3- YEAR END 1994 II. COMPARISON OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS Chart C. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL % TOTAL DISTRICT SF SFA SFTTR DUP MF MHC D.U. D.U. CHARLOTTESVILLE 12 0 11 0 138 0 161 17% JACK JOUETT 17 0 0 0 0 0 17 2% RIVANNA 253 15 48 0 0 3 319 34% SAMUEL MILLER 52 5 0 1 0 6 64 7% SCOTTSVILLE 114 10 0 () 148 4 276 29% WHITE HALL 63 28 0 2 0 9 102 11% TOTAL I 511 58 59 3 286 22 939 100% Chart D. Breakdown of New Residential Dwelling Units by Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AREA TOTAL UNITS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 39 0 33 0 138 0 210 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 61 10 0 0 148 0 219 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 9 5 0 0 0 0 14 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 CROZET COMMUNITY 9 28 0 2 0 1 40 HOLL YMEAD COMMUNITY 95 2 26 0 0 0 123 SCOTTS"'ILL~ COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EARL YSVILLE VILLAGE 4 0 0 0 0 2 6 NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 PINEY MOUNTAIN VILLAGE 1 9 0 0 0 0 10 RIVANNA VILLAGE 77 0 0 0 0 0 77 300 RURAL AREA 1 53 0 0 0 0 6 59 RURAL AREA 2 48 0 0 0 0 3 51 RURAL AREA 3 63 0 0 1 0 4 68 RURAL AREA 4 47 0 0 0 0 6 53 TOTAL 511 58 59 3 286 22 939 Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development \ -4- YEAR END 1994 III. COMPARISON OF ALL BUILDING PERMfTS Chart E. Estimated Cost of Construction by Magisterial District and Construction Type MAGISTERIAL NEW *NEW NON-RES. NEW COMMERCIAL FARM BUILDING TOTAL DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL & ALTER. RES. & NEW INSTITUT. & ALTER. COMM. No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ No. Amount-$ CHVILLE 29 6,861,895 90 1,012,692 9 7,526,800 77 2,607,603 205 18.008,990 JOUETT 17 4,401,000 80 1,212,158 2 81,200 15 1,021.920 114 6,716,278 RIVANNA 319 38,660,407 198 3,269,649 13 4,804,368 52 7,874,520 582 54,608,944 S. MILLER 64 9,594,300 165 4,660,470 9 1,259,000 24 4,452,644 262 19,966,414 SCOTTSVILLE 135 16,389,630 145 4,206,132 6 216,500 20 434,550 306 21,246,812 WHITE HALL 102 11,337,283 187 3,338,979 8 129,500 28 919,991 325 15,725,753 TOTAL 666 87,~44,515 865 17,700,080 47 14,017,368 216 17,311,228 1,794 136,273,191 * Additional value of mobile homes placed In existing parks Is included In Residential Alteration Category. IV. CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY Chart F. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Elementary School District and Dwelling Unit Type SCHOOL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL PERCENT DISTRICT SF SFA SFITH DUP MF MHC D.U. TOTAL D.U. Agnor-Hurt 35 0 42 0 0 0 77 10.92% Broadus WoodlHenley 12 0 0 0 0 4 16 2.27%' Broadus Wood/Jouett 9 0 0 0 0 1 10 1.42% Brownsville 15 0 0 0 2 0 17 2.41% Crozet 15 26 0 0 0 0 41 5.82% Greer 2 0 0 0 95 0 97 13.76% Hollymead 93 17 37 0 0 0 147 20.85% Meriwether Lewis 30 0 0 0 0 0 30 4.26% Murray 17 0 0 0 0 0 17 2.41% Red Hill 14 0 0 0 0 2 16 2.27% Cafe/Burley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Cale/Walton 75 24 0 0 0 0 99 14.04% Scottsville 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 1.56% Stone Robinson/Burley 57 0 0 0 0 2 59 8.37% Stone Robinson/Walton 37 0 0 0 0 0 37 5.25% Stony Point 22 0 0 0 0 0 22 3.12% Wood brook 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.28% Yancey 6 0 0 0 0 1 7 0.99% TOTAL 452 67 79 0 97 10 705 100.00% Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development · .. -5- YEAR END 1994 IV. CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY (continued) Chart G. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Magisterial District and Dwelling Unit Type MAGISTERIAL DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL DISTRICT SF ~""A SFrrH DUP MF MHC CHARLOTTESVILLE 9 0 12 0 36 0 57 JACK JOUETT 15 0 0 0 59 0 74 RIVANNA 225 17 67 0 0 1 310 SAMUEL MILLER 54 7 0 0 2 0 63 SCOTTSVILLE 98 17 0 0 0 4 119 WHITE HALL 51 26 0 0 0 5 82 TOTAL 452 67 79 0 97 10 705 Chart H. Breakdown of CO's for Residential Dwelling Units by Comprehensive Plan Area and Dwelling Unit Type COMP PLAN AREA DWELLING UNIT TYPE TOTAL ~F ~FA ~FrrH DUP MF MHI,; UNITS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 0 0 0 0 36 0 36 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 2 35 0 42 0 0 0 77 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 4 60 17 0 0 0 0 77 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 5 9 7 0 0 0 0 16 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD 7 1 0 0 0 59 0 60 CROZET COMMUNITY 10 26 0 0 0 0 36 HOLL YMEAD COMMUNITY 90 0 37 0 0 0 127 SCOTTSVILLE COMMUNITY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EARL YSVILLE VILLAGE 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 PINEY MTN. VILLAGE 3 17 0 0 0 0 20 NORTH GARDEN VILLAGE 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 RIVANNA VILLAGE 67 0 0 0 0 0 67 I AKt:A 280 67 79 0 95 1 522 RURAL AREA 1 45 0 0 0 0 4 49 RURAL AREA 2 36 0 0 0 0 1 37 RURAL AREA 3 51 0 0 0 2 3 56 RURAL AREA 4 40 0 0 0 0 1 41 172 u U 0 2 9 183 I TOTAL 452 67 79 0 97 10 705 Prepared by Albemarle County Planning and Community Development .- . 3¿/~7.f:- ;:77:éM5: 5/¿:;J March 17, 1995 u_.___·_ . \1r1 ír '\ \~ @ ~ n dl. \2. -' ':'1 ts U "_J ,', '_:' -- _...··4·"...···-········-· , , ; Walter F. Perkins, Chair Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 M(lP 0 1995 KD OF SU~~;~·_ RE: Jefferson Area Board for Aging (JABA) Advisory Council I was first appointed to the Advisory Council in February 1990. I have been recently reappointed for a term expiring May 1997. Periodically, I submit brief periodic summaries of activities in an effort to keep the Board of Supervisors informed of issues. The Advisory Council is mandated by the Older Americans Act. It consists of individuals who are active as advocates for the elderly in various community organizations. Most members act as individual advisors to JABA staff in various capacities. Major issues in process since January 1994 include: 1. Capital Funds Campaign. The site plan for the Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center (TJAHC) has been approved by Albemarle County. The TJAHC will be a state-of-the-art family care center with "one stop shopping" including day care, clinic, home safety and other allied activities. The Capital Campaign Cabinet of 35 community leaders has been recruited and planning activities are underway. 2. Communications. JABA continues to work with Police and other organizations to develop programs for the elderly. Among the programs presented in 1994 were the "Scams against the Elderly" and "Attracting the 50+ Market". JABA has cooperated with the Chamber of Commerce to develop a retirement guide for the area. 3. Transportation. Local access to suitable transportation continues to be a major problem for the elderly and persons with a disability. JABA has worked closely with JAUNT to start new transportation programs. JABA has also with closely with JAUNT and Louisa County to maximize resources by redirecting funds to qualify for federal and state matching. 4. Senior Centers. Activities at the senior centers include health screenings, nutritional counseling, and exercise programs. New centers opened in Gladstone and Rockfish in May 1994. The Shipman center celebrated its 20th anniversary. Albemarle centers are located in Esmont at the New Green Mountain Baptist Church and Western Albemarle at the Meadows. JABA would like to expand operations at all centers to 3 days per week. ~ Jefferson Area Board for Aging Advisory Council Report Page 2 5. Health Care. JABA and many of its volunteers took part in several of the health care debates over the last year. Long-term care and homecare services are important issues. Quality programs will reduce health care costs, increase the quality of aging, prevent caregiver burnout, and reduce stress often associated with caregiving. 6. Housing. The need for more low/moderate income housing for the elderly and persons with disabilities grows each day. This issue will not go away as our population ages. Please contact me if you would like additional information about the Goals and activities of JABA. Sincerely, ~~}W~/~ Robert J. Walters, Jr. 1645 Ravens Place Charlottesville, VA 22901-7527 Copy: Ed Jones, Chair Board of Directors Gordon Walker, Executive Director Leicester Handsfield, Chair Advisory Council Melvin A. Breeden, Albemarle County Director of Finance 3 --;3/-7'5 Y5: t?';f05 5~ COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA office of the Governor /: i~obe~Ü, Skunda Secre¿;y ó! Co¡pm.erce and Trade George Allen Governor March 15, 1995 MAR 0 19$ Ms. Ella W. Carey Clerk County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Dear Ms. Carey: Governor Allen has asked me to thank you for conveying the Board of Supervisors' resolution regarding funding for a regional visitors center on Route 29 in Danville. The Governor supports the development of a regional visitors center to enhance tourism along the Route 29 corridor, and he included $200,000 in the recommended FY 1995-96 budget, which General Assembly has accepted. We are pleased that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors supports this effort, and look forward to working with you to promote other tourism opportunities in the future. Again, thank you for sharing your support with me. With best wishes, I remain, ~---".-~,,,...,,,..,----- RTS/cef P.O. Box 1475 · Richmond, Virginia 23212 · (804) 786-7831 . TDD (804) 786-7765 3-3/-;9S- ~5:- /~...5: ~ ~ , COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA H. Alexander Wise, Jr., Director 221 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Department of Historic Resources Ü ,Cri(:. . ,,~ March 17, 1995 Mrs. F. Palmer Weber Malvern Farm Route 3, Box 162 Charlottesville, VA 22903 RE: Malvern, Albemarle County (DHR N° 02-92) Dear Mrs. Weber: In January, The Department of Historic Resources notified you of our interest in including the above property on the Virginia Landmarks Register and nominating it to the National Register of Historic Places. While the meeting of the State Review Board was held as planned, the Board of Historic Resources lacked a quorum and so deferred its business until its scheduled April meeting. As a result, while the nomination has been forwarded to the National Park Service for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, the property will be considered for listing in the Virginia Landmarks Register in April. The Virginia Landmarks Register is the Commonwealth's official listing of places judged to have national, state, or local archaeological, architectural, and/or historical significance. At its next meeting on April 19, 1995, the Board of Historic Resources will have the opportunity to consider the inclusion of Malvern on this register. Should the board determine the prepared nomination for Malvern is acceptable, it will be entered in the Virginia Landmarks Register. You are invited to attend the meeting of the Virginia Board of Historic Resources at which the nomination will be considered the Board will meet on April 19, 1995 at 10:00 a.m., in Senate Room A in the General Assembly building, Richmond. Virginia. We hope that you can come. Listing in the Virginia Landmarks Register does not mean that limitations will be placed on the properties by the state government. Public visitation rights are not required of owners. The state government will not attach restrictive covenants to the properties or seek to acquire them. Enclosed, please find a notice that explains, in greater detail, the results of listing in the National Register and the Virginia Landmarks Register and that describes the rights and procedures by which an owner may comment on or object to listing in the registers. TELEPHONE: (804) 786-3143 TDD: (804) 786-1934 FAX: (804) 225-4261 An Equal Opportunity Agency .~. . ,'" March 17, 1995 Mrs. F. Palmer Weber Re: Malvern, Albemarle County Should you have any questions about this nomination before the meeting of the Board of Historic Resources, please contact John Salmon or James Hill at (804) 786-3143. Yours truly, ~:ii.1 . ".~. í:V; /' /= /J/l/Jd ( ...j CL--J:..-":'..-L-,,-/\..y-; c/¿~:' / ' \\ J ie L. V osmik, Director ". ivision of Survey and Register JLV/sdm Enclosures c: The Honorable Walter F. Perkins, Chairman Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director, Planning Department Jacquelyn Huckle, Chairman, Planning Commission Nancy K. O'Brien, Executive Director Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission Melinda Frierson, Albemarle County Historical Society Geoffrey B. Henry, Preservation Consultant _I -,' t\A ^' \1-=--;; 1\ ¡ :·It¡~I/¡,...~,i\J VftV\ \1-lloi-04D """ ! I I t.¡- .,I,j, . 4209OOOmN. ~ILE ROAD CLASSIFICATION Primary highway, hard surface Secondary highway, hard surface I nterstate Route Light-duty road, hard or improved surface 'ý< .$-<S> "'.$-~-? .9 ~ ~-1-- '!-<,,~ Unimproved road ;;;;;;;=; . U. S. Route (-~; State Route '-../ . . ,';-GINIA. ------ CROZET, VA. 38078-A6-TF-024 :UAD¡;A'..~.E .OCAT!OI' ::>evIS'Jns snowr ,purple ¿H~cJ 'Noojland comoilea In Cooper3tlon ,', ~h '::"::~T1"""'')n\......~" ~.~, ,.;. \ilr~:~:,-~ c:.2er¡c!e:: ~,~orr. 2er;al =:~ct;::::-"'!r.:~r: 1973 PHOTOREVISED 1987 JMA 5260 I) 51,'.' SERI:::- -c. -, / r::.~ ~-_. ;:.. -,.?/ -.,.<J ;?5 v~ #' d.~ .::~ /ç David P. Bowennan Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596 (804) 2965843 FAX (804) 9724060 March 22, 1995 Charles S. Martm Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouell -' ""~"""c-_""'~~'_'r_'~'_'" - R¡VdfHld is (¡Ù [5 n WI Ie, ., U1J S U \~, .l\\ialter F. Perkms . - ...,~ ........~,-,~ -' , White Hðll Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scoltsville MAR p. 1995 Sally H. Thomas S,Hnlwl Mdl{'r The Honorable David 1. Toscano, Mayor City of Charlottesville P. O. Box 911 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Dear David: Prior to your final budget deliberations, I wanted to inform you and the other Council members of several items in the County's FY 1995-96 proposed budget that were approved by the Board of Supervisors during their worksessions this past week: · A recommendation to fund the County's share of the Teen Center at 58.5% with a request that the City fund their share at 41. 5%. This is a compromise between the City and County's prior agreement to fund the Teen Center at 50/50 and the City's FY 1995-96 proposed funding share of 33%. This compromise would allow Teen Center staff to not only keep the center open, but to continue to work on increasing City youth participation at the center, as well as other teen sponsored activities in the community. Without these ongoing revenues to pay for part-time staff at the Teen Center, sustained outreach to City youth and coordination for other teen activities outside the center will be difficult. The additional 8.5% would require the City to contribute an additional $7,000, with the understanding that if the participation rate by City youth did not increase by the end of the second year of operation, then the next operating budget (3rd year) would be based on the two year attendance figures for County and City youth. · A recommendation to provide a 2% stipend to compensation board funded staff positions at the Joint Security Complex on top of their state salaries. · A recommendation to fund $18,000 ($6,000 per officer In the joint City/County/University Narcotics Unit) for overtime, buy money, informant funds, equipment and general operations for the Narcotics Unit, since asset seizure monies are no longer available. This funding is contingent on a similar contribution trom the City and the University. * Printed on recycled paper The Honorable David 1. Toscano March 22, 1995 Page 2 of2 . A reoemmendation to fund the County's share of both the Library Assistant II and the Library Clerk at Northside Library. . A recommendation to reduce the County's requested contribution to the Joint Security Complex based on the County's actual share of prisoner days for the prior fiscal year (37%) rather than the share (41 %) requested by the Jail Board, which was based on the projected number of prisoner days for the current year. This resulted in a reduction of $19,350 trom the County's required share of the joint operations. If you or other City Council members have any questions on the above budget recommendations that affect joint City/County operations, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Waft :¡~, Walter F. Perkins Chairman WFP/rww 95.005 c: Mr. Cole Hendrix Ms. Linda Peacock COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY /-//;:?s- .~. AGENDA TITLE: February 1995 Financial Report AGENDA DATE: AprilS, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: ;&-:¿:I~~ Ç/6 INFORMATION: AcrION: SUBJEcrIPROPOSAUREOUEST: February 1995 Financial Report for the General and School Funds CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: X ATTACHMENTS: Yes STAFF CONTAcr(S): Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Walters REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Attached is the February 28, 1995 Monthly Financial Report for the General and School Funds. Projected General Fund revenues were last revised in January. Revenue projections are scheduled to be revised with the March Financial Report. Projected General Fund expenditures have not been revised at this time, but are scheduled to be revised with the March Financial Report. Projected School revenues and expenditures are based on the January School Financial Report and will be updated with the March Financial report. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance of the February 1995 Financial Report. (' df~ 95.048 .) ;~,>f': en zl- Qa: 1-0 <Q",II) a:wcn wa:cn Q", .... 0-' - <co ~ÕN ZZ> ::::)<a: OZ< -::::) (,)LL.a: ~~ffi a:::J:LL. <I- :¡z wO ~:¡ < 1-"" zO ~a: a:e:. wC o..!;: *- *- *- *- Ql!. *- *- *- NC')CONC»CO.....0 CO.....COCOII)C')C')cn (f'jC\Ï'¡"";""':CÖ"";""': .....CO~CO COI/)CO *-*-*-*- CO NCO CO N.....O..... ""':mu)C\Ï cocn.......... *-*-*- COOCO .....COCO ""':cö""': 1/)1/)1/) '#. ..... .... C') co ~ Z < ::J: o ..... ~ C')~ cn 0 I cn COO 0 cnco CO ~,..: ..... ..... ..... 'iii:. ~ ..... ..... C ~I- -W a:e" Q",c 0::::) a:m Q", Q", < o ..... C') I/) gi N I/) CO~ ..........~N cn.....O O.....C')..... O.....N ~gg~~~æ~ .....~~CO..........O..... ,..: añ,..: C\ÏC')I/) CO N 0 0 ~ .......... ..... 0 01.....1 .....COCO..... cnC\lC')1/) C\Ïa)'COO .....~CO..... C\lI/)C\I..... añ..£COCO C\I C') en w ::::) z w > w a: en en a: C æ C Z en Z::> en Z ::> LL W < LL_(!} ::> a: -Jenz Z I- <...J- W a:O~ >Z::J: wOc:( W-~ ZIt> a:~~ ~~::> ...J-'W-' __en <~~~ c¿~J.~ffio~o OO...J<CI-<I- OOW.....W a: ...J...JWWLL ..... W Z ..... o Z ~ ~ a: Z w a: D.. W o ð ~...J (!) ~~ ~ ZZ a: a:w ~ W::?: UJ ð~ (!) (!}<W...J ...JD..a:< <Wæ..... a:Cen~ W1zm ZZ<::> WOa:W (!}Z..... in w en z w Q", >< W ~ C')! .....1 cn~C') C\lC')CO óC')C') cnC')C\I I/)~O ,..:1/)..... CO CO co o N ~ ~I .... II) o .... Z W 0 ZwCñ OC- ¡:::Z~ <::>C a:LL...J W(!}O D..ZO O-I C~O Z<en ::>........J LLW< ...J::>..... OWO 01..... ,...LLm ........J::> OWW ww en w en z w Q", >< w a: w > o en w ::::) z w > w a: LL o W (,) z :5 < m en w en z w Q", >< W -' ~ o I- c Z ::J .... LL a: ...J 0 e:( 0.. It) a: w en w a: ~ z ...J W e:( co" " Õ '" ~ z >- z ~ ~ ::J LL- ::J o a: o ~ m ~ :I: LL a: .... e:( Z :I 0 w :I ~ e:( ......, zO Wa: 00.. a:- wC D.!;: *-*-*-*-*-*- "''''''I:t''''8(f) <O"'CO(f) en eti .....: 0 C\Ï 8· C\Ï ""I/)(f)"" ,... .... *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-'tt (f)0)........ <0""0)0 "'<0"" O)(f) 0)....0 <O(f) en.... 0,... <òcxi"":"":m<ò<ò<òmlÖa; <0<0,...<0<0<01/)<00)""<0 c ~w 0" wZ ..,e:( 0:I: a:0 0.. .... 0- c ~.... -w a: " o..c O::J a:m 0.. 0.. e:( ~~8!~èJ)Î~! o "I:tl/) 0)1/)1/) ma)(f) Ò"l:t I/) ,...<0....<01/).... ""(f)"'(f)1/)0) ....:añ eti...."I:t <0,...,... 0- en w ::J Z W > w a: tn a: w LL tn tn Z w e:( ::Jza: z-.... W(/):I: >0:.... ...Jww- <a:u..~ ::;!WO:...J(/)...J õ~~e:(~e:( Ol-w....O:.... ...J(/)u..~I-~ "I:t,... "I:t (f).... 1/)........ 0 0I<O~ (f)"'...."'<O"I:t"l:t....coco.... (f)...."I:t(f)<OO)O)....C\I(f)1/) Òc-j....:etiañ~añ~maJlt) """I:t"l:tOaJOO"'''I:taJ (f)_ o:t:. CC!.. C'!. ,..._ aJ_ "':. ...._ ~ C\I ;; "I:t....,...C\I"I:t<OC\lC\I"I:taJ"I:t (f) ,... tn W tn Z W 0.. >< W z o ~ w æ 0: 0:1- tn I-Z ~z Z (/)0 ...JW W Z¡:: I-::>:::!: 0.. -.- zoO. >< :::!:ã: W ""'0...1 W 01- :::!: ~ü:1~ " <~ 0. ¡::>z Z ~z>(/)o <ww - ð~I-~ü:1 wo:::!: ~ ," 0 æ 0: > Z 0: > I- (/) 0: '""«Ow U!:::O:O:W ~...I(/)3:og~z~wo.. o:~uuz<""'::>wu..o wU--<u(/):::!:o(/)...J zõffiffi:::!:::>æ:::!:z~< ~ ::> ::> ::> ::> 0 < 0 0 0: 0.... ,",,""')Q.Q.J:WQ.UZI- .... il tn W en Z W 0.. >< W a: W > o tn W ::J Z W > W 0: LL o W o Z :5 e:( m e z ::) .... LL a: ..J 0 0 Q", II) 0 W Ø) a: Ø) ::;¡: .,... 0 ..J 0 0( CO Õ C\I ~ > z a: z 0( 0( ::) z ::) 0 ü: a: 0 ~ ŒI ~ W ::;¡: LL a: .... 0( z :E 0 w :E ~ 0( ...."'" zO ~g: a::- We Q",~ '#. '#. '#.1 '#. '#. '#. t'? 11)8 0>0 <0 .,...<0 0.,...0> C'lÍC'IÍci~"ItC'IÍ <0<0 <0<0<0 '#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'l1. 0.,... C\l1I) <0 C\I(Ø OC\l..-CIOOt'?I' cOcx)('"j('"j('"jci,..; 11)<0<0<00>11)11) La ..~..~. ....0 Ø)w ..~...~. ilL e ~.... -w a:CJ Q",e 0::) a:ŒI Q", Q", 0( ..- t'? of'j CIO <01 of'i ..-..-0 C\I<O 0> I'I'of'CIOof'C\I cDoil'cri'<Oo II) 0 of'..-I'O> ~ "l II) t'? C\I II) C\I t'?CIO..- C\I C\lt'?<O <0 CIO ..- ..- <0 C\I of' lI)of't'?o>o<OØ) C\lII)OII)t'?II)C\I ~añañoicõl'o C\/of'c\/c\/Oll)o> oct C\I. 0>. t'? ..- ..- II) <OC\/of'<O ..- of' .,... <0 i~ 1,1 e ~~ Oz Wo( ""'::;¡: ~o Q", o w ::) z w > w a: en a: w LL o en en z ...J w 0( o ::)za: o z-.... 5 W0::;¡: CIJ ...JGjffi!:: I «a:LL~ ::;!wa:..Jen..J .........w z o«Q~«~ 0t;woa:o ...J LL............. Z J: 0 ..... ~¡:: ...J « « 0 WClJZ- J:w«!!: ·0 Z Q w_<o CIJ ~5:!z~ w «W-z ~ QCIJ«o W ZZ~- WOz..... Q", ::¡::og ~ «~¡::a: e" :za:~t> z oOwz .... z¡::a..a..o 0( o«~OOCIJa: ¡::~«ClJClJa:~ OCIJa:~~~o :J-............... a:~...J::::¡::::¡~..J t;~ã:oo«~ ~~~~~~o .... if) w o z w Q", >< w ~ en w CIJ z w Q", >< w a: w > o o w ::) z w > w a: LL o w o z :s « ŒI , ~ 00 z o ¡::I- <a:1l) a:00) Wa.O) a.W.... o a: ~ >WCX) I-UC\I zz> ::J~~ O<::J Uma: wom ...JZW a: u.. <::J :Eu.. W m ...J < ...J <0 !::z a.::J <u.. U ...J 00 Oz :::I:::J Uu.. 00 ...J <0 a:z W::J ffiu.. " CX) CX) CO "" o .... S' C\I 0) C\Ï 0) <0 - iõ'oo ~~æ "":ÑC'f C\/'I'"''I'"' ('I) - NOS' 000 0)00 6 Itf ('1)- '1'"'('1)'1'"' '1'"'-- - 'I'"' ø o o "" "" 0) 'I'"' (Õ 'I'"' 'I'"' 0)- 0> "" - 'I'"' 0) 'I'"' - N ('I) v (Õ o 10 cD V 'I'"' - .... ø "" o C\I "" CO o ('I) .... ø S'M' OC\/ 00> 10- 10- C\/O 0>('1) -- 'I'"' - N C\/ o ..¢ ('I) C\/ - - o o o IÔ v 0) I o ('I) I CO o W U Z ~ < m o z ::J u.. --- 000) OOV 010'1'"' CIJ 10- Ñ ",,- a:~~- W u.. CIJ Z ~ I-- I-- ü W Z -, o 0 Q ~ g: CIJ ~ a: ::J Ö W ê> < W " a:CIJ ~ a § c...Q CIJ a: ro c...z CJ zllJ c... .. I üS~ Z ~z c... OOCIJ a:a:a: ;: üZ ü z W W 0 wClJO O~ I--~~ ~ 51-- ~~I-- I- I-- CIJ 0 W Z W Ü 0 I-- ClJI-- «...J>-ü a:::> I_z a:ffiCIJ8~zQ~ CJfÏ) Zo~w a.c...ZI<O<W Za: -c...~ ffooüul--~~ ~CJ ~a:~ a.a:I--ClJ~« a:ClJüz ww::> a.üS<Q~g~~mCIJClJg,~1lJ5ë3 <>-[~u..Qow::>~~o>Q« OI--OZI--WI--Q(Dcra:a:IwWa: ~~a:~fß~~Ið...Jü~~...J~üS oa:&:><::>a:a:~O~CIJ~~~w>- g:§üS~ߧ@üS5~~(D(D~tï:Q a.Üa:::>a:~CJIClJa:>:J:J-,CJ~ < o v 0) 6 C\/ 'I'"' .... .... ~ ~ ('I) .... CO C\I 'I'"' 10 CIJ Z o I- < a: a. o a: c... a. < o W > o a: a. a. < ...J < I- o I- W Ü Z ~ < ro o z ::J u.. ~ 1 ~;~/. "''/-::;-- 9S~ CJ!:::;7tN/¿I_)- S I 7 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA ~ 19f6 DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PO. BOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902-2013 A.G.TUCKER RESIDENT ENGINEER April 3, 1995 Board of Supervisors Meeting March 1, 1995 Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk Board of Supervisors County Office Building 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA. 22902 Dear Ms. Carey: This is in reference to your letter dated March 6, 1995 regarding transportation items discussed at the Board of Supervisors' meeting on March 1, 1995. The following will explain in more detail those items of which more information has been requested. The Residency Office has met with affected property owners and discussed the Route 610 project. The property owners most impacted by the realignment option did not want this project to deviate from the original scope (Route 610 as a no-plan improvement project). Fortunately, after revisiting those property owners that had yet to donate necessary right of way for the basic improvements, the Department has secured the deeded right of way that will allow this project to remain with a 10/96 ad date. There is no longer any need to purchase right of way, therefore the option to realign Routes 610 and 612 at Route 20 is not necessary. Comments regarding the restriction of through trucks on Georgetown Road (Route 656) will be received through April 15, 1995. A recommendation will be forwarded to the State Traffic Engineer for action by the Commonwealth Transportation Board in Mayor June. Route 633 and Structure no. 6029 are being reviewed for inclusion in the County's Secondary Six Year Plan priority list. The Department is currently discussing with the railroad the possibility of upgrading the bridge to an unrestricted access. We will keep you posted as information is received by the Department regarding this potential. Requests for new guardrail along Routes 250 and 810 have been forwarded to the District Maintenance Engineer for inclusion in upcoming schedules. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY .. '. Page 2 April 3, 1995 Ms. Ella W. Carey Board of Supervisors' Meeting The quarterly mailing for upcoming projects indicated that the Route 631, Rio Road project had a change in advertisement date. Please be advised that no dates have changed from those shown in the approved Secondary Six Year Plan. (The report was in error.) Also note that the Project Listing dated April 1, 1995 contains two (2) errors. Items (4) and (5) should read "Rt. 631 - from Berkmar Drive to Rt. 29" and "Rt. 631 - from Rt. 743 to Berkmar Dr." respectively. A corrected Project Listing is attached for your information. Work on the revised radius at Hydraulic Road and Georgetown Road started today. The left turn accident trend and subsequent data base that was needed to properly assess safety at this location was an issue shared with the task force by the District Traffic Engineer. It appears a misunderstanding may have occurred about this concern, but fortunately we are making progress in implementing this action, so all is moot. We will plan for the permanent curbing to be replaced at this intersection this time next month, pending any dramatic safety concerns. I will be prepared to discuss two (2) options available for placing a crossover on Route 29 near Carrsbrook Drive. Both options should address the public's concerns. I will have plans marked for review during this presentation. Should you have any questions regarding these or other subjects, I will be available at the day meeting on Wednesday, April 5th. Sincerely, ~ Attachments cc: D. R. Askew W. H. Mills R. James J. Hores w/attach. w/attach. w/attach. w/attach. " PROJECT LISTING ALBEMARLE COUNTY APRIL 1,1995 CURR. PREVo EST. RTE LOCATION - DESCRIPTION ADV. ADV. CONST NO. DATE DATE TIME (1) 29 FROM RIO ROAD TO RIVANNA RIVER (WIDEN TO 6 LANES) ADV. 24 MO. (2) 29 S.FORK RIVANNA RIV. TO AIRPORT RD.(WIDEN TO 6 LANES 08-99 24 MO. (3) 610 FROM ROUTE 20 TO 1.8 MI. E. RTE. 20 (GRAVEL ROAD) 10-96 6MO. (4) 631 FROM BERKMAR DR. TO ROUTE 29 08-95 6MO. (5) 631 FROM ROUTE 743 TO BERKMAR DR. 09-97 12 MO. (6) 631 FROM NCL CH'VILLE TO CSX RR (RIO ROAD) MEADOWCREEK PKY. 07-97 12 MO. (7) 637 FROM ROUTE 635 TO 0.55 MI.W, RTE. 682 (GRAVEL ROAD) 10-99 12 MO. (8) 649 FROM ROUTE 29 TO ROUTE 606 (AIRPORT ROAD) 12-00 9 MO. (9) 656 FROM ROUTE 654 TO ROUTE 743 04-01 6MO. (10) 671 BRIDGE & APPROACHES OVER MOORMANS RIVER (MILLlNGTION) ADV. 12 MO. (11 ) 682 FROM ROUTE 250 TO 1.7 MI. S. RTE. 250 (GRAVEL ROAD) 08-95 12 MO. (12) 711 FROM ROUTE 712 TO ROUTE 29 (GRAVEL ROAD) 10-97 5MO. (13) 712 FROM ROUTE 29 TO ROUTE 692 (GRAVEL ROAD) 10-96 9MO. (14) 743 FROM ROUTE 657 (LAMBS ROAD) TO ROUTE 631 01-96 12 MO. (15) 759 FROM ROUTE 616 TO FLUVANNA CO. LINE (GRAVEL ROAD) 10-99 5MO. (16) 760 FROM ROUTE 712 TO ROUTE 29 (GRAVEL ROAD) 10-98 12 MO. (17) 866 FROM ROUTE 743 TO ROUTE 1455 09-99 9MO. * INDICATES NEW PROJECT ** INDICATES REVISED DATE ADV. INDICATES THAT PROJECT HAS BEEN ADVERTISED REASONS FOR CHANGES IN ADVERTISEMENT DATES ! ., " " -. DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219-1939 , fLc5" -?' J $~#J:5/F COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA _,_ _..'" March 27, 1995 CLAUDE D. GARVER, JR. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OPERATIONS Change in the Primary System Route 250 Project: 0250-002-105, C-501 Albemarle County Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle 410 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 Dear Board Members: Change in the Primary System made necessary by the relocation and construction on Route 250, Project: 0250-002-105, C-501 in Albemarle County was confirmed by the Commonwealth Transportation Board on March 16 as shown on the attached sketch and described as follows: SECTION ABANDONED AS PROVIDED UNDER SECTION 33.1-148 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA: Section 1 - Old location of Route 250, located north of the new location, from Station 88+00 to Station 100+64 0.24 Mile . C aude D. ver, Jr. Assistant Commissioner Operations TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY r: .. MOVED BY Dr. Rowlette , SECONDED BY Dr. Thomas , THAT WHEREAS, Route 250, in Albemarle County, has altered and reconstructed as shown on plans for Project: 0250-002-105, C-501¡ and WHEREAS, one section of the old road is no longer necessary as a public road or for purposes of the State Highway System, as the new road serves the same citizens as the old¡ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that p~rsuant to Section 33.1-148 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, 0.24 mile of Route 250, designated as Section 1 on the plat dated November 16, 1994, Project: 0250-002-105, C-501, be abandoned as part of the State Highway System. MOTION CARRIED. March 16, 1995 ®~~t :/, ,/, r/,' '/,' -\II " n¡;.,j>3..:,·.y.J " ¥~7'.J\'1\I11 I I V-.lS3'/\1......--:......../J '\' ,I 1(- ';;-, Õl.J",Ù I\< '/ ' "I:'k.Y.f3f' '" ,it OJ¡~ '.<" - -.,¡l~m- .~ --., ( == "3 ~\1 ( ÇðQ1MIA , , " " , , , . , l,,;¡., - -----OÕ~¡_~ -. ßr- ~ In o III , <...J 001\13'·0 NJ ~ 31~~.t u-) o , N 8 , o '" "" o ./ / ~ ~. ...., tïi § 8 æ ~ - bOl·OS'ù.: ~ ~:. '" o T " " '" ~ ... î: <1; '. , o \[) '" CJ J ~..j'" ~ /' -... ~I/ ~ ~, r, I~.J· Q-' ,,>-,t~ ,7' '" ,,,- ~,~ ,,'/ I I, ':., -/;:~/-('>, \~.../,' '~,'~"'-:-, ---;-;:~--:::~ ->' >,,~ rÐ'\I ;,: t~ '>;'1 ,ï/ /1, r II;;: Iw If! I~ I I I I I I .111f.I(] ~:;'{)Ot.¡ M~, ~ c:: :J o -uÜ C Q) ~ï:: ( CO ....J E Q) .c « ~ 3ìb\; "¡397 37ìI/\~",-;._~ ~~"." = .s .... u .š '" = 8 "0 =- CII= .~ ~ ~..: ..s~ ~u Q ~ ....¡r¡ 111= -6~ ~â ~¡r¡ rlJS ~~ CII ~ E ..... 'C e ~~~r ~:; . ~ Q III ; ~ , .c = . U Q - - - - 'î ®I ,\\ J '"0 Q) § ] .g c:: o '1ä (.) ..9 ~ o ~ ~ Æ ...... o c::: o ''¡: (.) Q) I J ÕI··§ i .~ 5 is 0._ CI ~ .5 e_¡ t .~ 2_~ c: W$ Q u E_!E~ æ {!;:: a. ....~ ~ ././/_ _~~~./'i.r / /' ~ ~~..~:/'r:~...:;. ~ ~ COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND. 23219-1939 March 27, 1995 CLAUDE D. GARVER, JR. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OPERATIONS Changes in the Primary System Route 20 Project: 0020-002-S17, C-501 Albemarle County Board of Supervisors County of Albemarle 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 Dear Board Members: Changes in the Primary System made necessary by the relocation and construction on Route 20, Project: 0020-002-S17, C-501 in Albemarle County were confirmed by the Commonwealth Transportation Board on March 16 as shown on the attached sketch and described as follows: SECTION ABANDONED AS PROVIDED UNDER SECTION 33.1-148 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA: sections 1 - Old location of Route 20, located northwest and 2 of the new location, from station 156+00 to Station 167+05 0.21 Mile Claude D. Garver, Jr. Assistant Commissioner Operations TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY ; MOVED BY Dr. Rowlette , SECONDED BY Dr. Thomas, THAT WHEREAS. Route 20 in Albemarle County has been altered and t reconstructed as shown on plans for Project: 0020-002-S17, C-501; and WHEREAS, two sections of the old road are no longer necessary as a public road, the new road serving the same citizens as the old; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Section 33.1-148 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, 0.21 mile of old Route 58 designated as Sections 1 and 2 on the plat dated November 2, 1994, Project: 0020-002-S17, C-501, be abandoned as a part of the State Highway System; and MOTION CARRIED. March 16, 1995 ~ i ö c ~ :J <[ f.'IJ :i:. 0 w ""Õ:J "CÜ ";> ...J </]W c: --' ~I- Q) Q) ;;; en ~ II} (J)'t: ~ ~ð ~ CO <0 E "'-: f- '-<'1 Q) . 0- on . .c ~j 1 I ,0 - « >-' I I-~ 0 Q)'(;Ç ~ LOll '\t.lS u:o.: , I I ~..." ~ lm: I, N .' " , u ,',/ ~I I', I" I" I'; I', . _I ,,' \ is '" I U ~ " ........ ......... ''-...., ~ If) , ('oJ a a I a "" 8 <'J .... r- ..... ~~ -ž¡;:i 3~ '-'~ , 1 lor, \ ~J \ \ ., \ \ " \ I "1 \ . '1~, ® ,'~ ~ ~ I 0 JI I , '; , , ~ I I W --' ....J > U) w t:: o ....J 0<: ~ ;"~I tEt! ðJlI1 J OO'OO~ Ç'ÇIVJ.Ç r: </, l N 1'£ u.i ~8 2+- :Zo 8- D6 ;3 <') = .2 1:: '"0 .š § '" '"0 8 æ "0 ~ = \III C = .g .2 CIS ~.... g 0<= - t ~ -g .s u 0 ... r-: ~ ::I.... i "0 rn eÑ ~ g . '" é p.., ;"'1"4 (,¡..., ~g 0 \III" C e 1:: .g ·C'" 0 ~..,., 0 ~~~f r¡ ... ,. OÐ::I , ;¡ ~ ø ð i ' GI"'~ ggE GI '- .c =Ü~ E5! 11 õ:¡¡¡ tf.~ GI 0 ~ ()'ë) ö. 0-", c.~ "U Q) :.;:: ~o.GlC: ~~]l ~ .c C a.S GlGIEIl) .~ E 8 VJ OI~ oð GlIUGlI- g¡ 0.£ ê .9.!"2_0 n.1U0U. ~I·ª 1: > 8. c ...'" co co .. 'co ~_:B Õ .5 i.~ !_~~ tiÞ f/-5/S- :95: ¿;1PS 5zc Registrar of Voters COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of the General Registrar 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5863 Electoral Board :1 MEMORANDUM To: Members of the Board of From: James M. Heilman General Registrar superj~ f{/. tb-- Date: March 31, 1995 Subject: District/Precinct Name Changes This is to advise you that I have just received a letter of approval from the U. S. Department of Justice for the name changes you passed by ordinance in January. As per your actions and Justice's approval, the Charlottesville Magisterial District is now the Rio Magisterial District, the Berkeley Precinct is now the Commonwealth Precinct, and the Rio Hill Precinct is now the Agnor-Hurt Precinct. Citizens in the affected areas will be notified of these changes as soon as possible. u.s. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division DLP:CMK:CEI:jdp DJ 166-012-3 95-0232 IfJting Section P.O. Box 66128 Uáshington, D.C 20035-6128 March 27, 1995 Mr. James M. Heilman General Registrar 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Dear Mr. Heilman: This refers to the name change from the Charlottesville Magisterial District to the Rio Magisterial District, from the Rio Hill and Berkeley Voting Precincts to the Agnor-Hurt and the Commonwealth Voting Precincts in Albemarle County, Virginia, submitted to the Attorney General pursuant to section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1973c. We received your submission on January 26, 1995. The Attorney General does not interpose any objection to the specified changes. However, we note that section 5 expressly provides that the failure of the Attorney General to object does not bar subsequent litigation to enjoin the enforcement of the changes. See the Procedures for the Administration of section 5 (28 C.F.R. 51.41). Sincerely, Deval L. Patrick Assistant Attorney General civil Rights Division By: Lbtævn vm. /1Jrrv{ ~Elizabeth Johnson Acting Chief, Voting Section '" , David P. Bowennan Charlottesville Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville TO: FROM: COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 MEMORANDUM Board of Supervisors Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC :;zue, ..-/ DATE: March 31, 1995 SUBJECT: Reading List for April 5, 1995 December 7, 1994 - pages 1 - 15 (#13) - Mrs. Thomas ~ February ~brUary EWC:mms 13 (A), 1995 - Mr. Bowerman /'" 15, 1995 - pages 1 - 12 - Mr. Perkins J( pages 13 - end - Mr. Marshall~ * Printed on recycled paper 3-3/-j?5 j?Æ~~r(5:.~d Charles S. Martin Rivanna Walter F. Perkins White Hall Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller f . . . \~ \o.~ ~ . February 13, 1995 (Adjourned Meeting) (Page 3) using the Fund Balance and carryover funds shows in the next year's fiscal budget. Going into FY 1995-96, the General Fund had $5,989,384 in new revenue, but when the carryover and Fund Balance of $925,000 has to be taken out of the budget, it only leaves $5,070,246 in new revenues. The same principle carries over into the School Division fund. The School Division will receive $2,028,237 in new revenues from the General Fund transfer, but $798,116 will be taken from that for carryover revenues, which only leaves $1,230,121. Between the General Fund and School Fund the total available new revenues are $4,266,268 after $1,723,116 is taken out for non-recurring funds. This shows that there are some one-time and on-going costs and it is difficult to tell between the two and decide what type of funds are going into actual recurring revenues or how difficult it will be to come up with those funds during the next year. The next chart showed a specific example of how General Government got into trouble by going against a good principle of using non-recurring funds. The chart shows the cost of vehicles (mostly police replacement vehicles) in FY 1990-91. It shows that a lot of new vehicles were purchased using one-time savings which in 1992 allowed that money to be used for something else. This seemed like a good idea at the time because there were additional revenues to use for other things, but it shows that by not keeping that fund level for replacement vehicles, it has taken a long time to build it up again. It has been difficult to put an additional $100,000 to $150,000 each year in the fund for replacement vehicles. Hopefully, this has leveled off and 19 vehicles will be replaced per year. This struggle should not be incurred this year. The School Division also had expenditures in FY 1991-92 for replacement vehicles (buses). The expenditure then decreased over the next four years. The speculation is that like General Government, there may be difficulties in trying to build up that fuhd and require an expenditure of funds in the out years to bring the funding level up again. This year staff tried to do a Debt Service Reserve Fund. The debt payments will decrease in the next couple of years, but will increase signifi- cantly in FY 1999-2000 because of the new high school. Staff has decided to try and fund debt service over a period of time and will try to put approxi- mately $270,000 in the Debt Service Fund so that there are minor increases each year, without an up and down cycle and without having to come up with large amounts of money in later years. The Capital Budget Policy emphasis, will continue to be placed upon a viable level of "pay-as-you-go" capital construction to fulfill needs in a Board approved CIP. The County believes in funding a significant portion of capital improvements on a cash basis and will, therefore, increase incrementally the percentage of its capital improvements financed by current revenues. The County's goal will be to dedicate a minimum of three percent of the annual General Fund revenues allocated to the County's operating budget to the CIP. Funds in excess of the required undesignated fund balance may be considered. In FY 1991-92, approximately $1.0 million was transferred to the CIP fund and it is projected that in fiscal year 1999-2000 $3.0 million will be transferred. Albemarle County will have at least a three percent minimum amount because approximately $2.8 million will be transferred in FY 1995-96. The second chart on the capital budget policy shows that in addition to the increasing transfer, debt service increased in FY 1991-92 from approxi- mately $3.7 million to approximately $8.0 million for FY 1999-2000. There are a lot of reasons why the debt service has increased; five new schools have been built in the last six years and there is the impending high school. None of these projects could have been completed without incurring debt service. There are several other reasons why tne debt service has increased: the County's debt service increased as the available Fund Balance revenues decreased; a lot of capital projects used to be funded with Fund Balance revenues due to federal revenue sharing monies which were used for capital projects and the Fund Balance had more revenues in it. The Fund Balance is part of the financial policy which has to be maintained at a certain level in order to have a cash flow. In September, there was a Fund Balance of approxi- mately $11.5 million and expenditures of $12.1 million. The more revenue that can be put into the Fund Balance, the more revenue can be transferred for CIP projects. The last slide showed a conclusion when talking about one-time monies, cash flow, and what is needed in the Fund Balance. One opt1on 1S to put one- time revenues into the Fund Balance for the capital budget and reduce interest charges. The other option is to begin to establish reserve funds which will help the operating budget through annual fluctuations in cash flow. ,.. " \0 this is the Board's own balanced ussed. Staff is forcing the Board a debt payment level as possible She has a theory that the Boards will Mrs. Thomas said it strikes her that budget constitutional amendment being di to have as little debt and keep as . by forcing the use of carryover funds. not have the political will to do this. II II Mr. Landrith said he likes the idea of having a way to cut down the County's debt. He questions the attitude of replacing a xerox machine because of fear that the money will be lost when the machine may be good for another year or two. He asked if anything is in place to help with such a situation. He does not want unneeded items to be purchased because of a fear that the ,. " ------------- --- ._- Da\l1d P Bowennan Charll)!!('svdle COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of BOdrcl "I SlIlwrvlsors 401 MclI1111.> HOdd Charlottesville. \ilf<jlflld 22Y024596 (804) 296·5843 fAX ¡HOI)¡ 2965800 Charles S Martin Rl\,',Jnnd ChMlolte Y. Humph"s ,1.:Kk ,J()upll Walter F Perkins Whiff' H,j!l Forrest R. Marshall. Jr Scotlsvll!e Sally H. Thomas Sdrnuei Mdkr April 7, 1995 Mrs. Angela Tucker, Resident Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation P. O. Box 2013 Charlottesville, VA 22902-0013 Dear Mrs. Tucker: Following is a list of items from the Board of Supervisors' meeting on April 5, 1995: Item 5.4. Letter dated March 22, 1995, from A. G. Tucker, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, forwarding the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently under construction and the Quarterly report of projects under design in Albemarle County. Angela Tucker clarified that on the Project Listing attached to this letter, No.4 should read .. Route 631 from Berkmar Drive to Route 29 North", and No.5. should read "Route 631 from Route 743 to Berkmar Drive." No. 17. is "Route 866 (Greenbrier Drive) from Route 743 (Hydraulic Road) to Route 1455." Mrs. Tucker said No.4 will only be built if it is accepted as a piece of the current project. --~~ Agenda Item No. 7a. Transportation Matters: Discussion: Route 610 Proposed Improvements (deferred from March 1, 1995). Mrs. Tucker informed the Board that from Route 20 to the end of state maintenance, 2.0 + miles the road will be widened and improved within a 50 foot right-of-way, and surface treated. There will be no realignment of Route 610 with Route 612. Agenda Item No. 7b. Transportation Matters: Discussion: Route 633 Improvements. Mrs. Tucker said a field review is being planned soon with representatives from the railroad. There appears to be a possibility of upgrading Structure No. 6029 to a two-lane non-restricted facility, and, at such time, the Department will take over full maintenance of that structure. At this time, it is the Railroad's responsibility to maintain it. It would have to be included in the Six-Year Plan for some funding along with improve- ments to Route 633 which is a gravel road. Agenda Item No. 7c. Transportation Matters: Report on Route 29 North Crossover near Carrsbrook Drive. Mrs. Tucker presented two new options. The Board agreed to support Alternative 1 which shows a reconfigured entrance of Carrsbrook Drive with Route 29 but not a relocated entrance, the crossover to be relocated from the southernmost entrance of Better Living to a more centered position <Ð Printed 0/1 I ended popel' , ....'" Mrs. Angela Tucker April 7, 1995 Page 2. opposite the the mid-point of the property, and, adding four-way stop signs on Carrsbrook Drive at Clarke Lane. A four-way stop sign at Northfields/Carrsbrook Drive is left to the discretion of the Highway Department. If you have any questions about the items listed (some are just informational), please contact me at 296-5843. EWC:len Sincerely, &/JA ¿ué U Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ¡I) Board of County Supervisors . V -4 / ../ " ',- I ~ ' ; ~ l ;..... '(rè)8~WÍ'-: COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA FEB 2 L 9g5 DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PO. BOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902-2013 February 16, 1995 A. G, TUCKER RESIDENT E~N~ j3 ::7/-;?--.!; ;J£¿Jß:7/ ~f/ Route 610, Proposed Improvement Albemarle County Ms. Ella Carey, Clerk Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Ms. Carey: After a recent review of the Route 610 project, we have determined that the intersections of Route 610 and 612 will remain substandard without some realignment of the two roads at Route 20. We have been unable to obtain the necessary donation of right of way for this alignment. We have four options on how to proceed with the development and construction of this project. 1. Construct the section of Route 610 with the available donated right way ( from 0.4 miles east of Route 20 to the dead end). This will leave approximately 0.4 miles of unimproved road and a substandard intersection at Route 20. Right of way from Route 20 to 0.4 miles east is not available through donation. 2. Remove the Route 610 project from the six year plan because all right of way is not available through donation. 3. Purchase the necessary right of way ( two parcels) to upgrade Route 610 under the current project scope and leave the intersection with Route 20 substandard. 4. Proceed with the survey on the 0.4 mile section of road and purchase the necessary right of way to realign Routes 610 and 612 ( sketch showing Options A and B on realignment attached ). This option will delay construction of this project approximately two years until mid 1998 and increase the overall cost of the project by approximately $250,000. This will require two separate projects, but they could likely be built simultaneously. The allocation in the current six year plan for the proposed improvement is $940,000. Utilizing Option 2, an additional $250,000 will be required to fund the entire project, based on current estimates. The Department recommends pursuing Option 4 in order that all improvements be made in the most efficient and effective manner possible. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY .. Ms. Ella Carey Page 2 Route 610, Proposed Improvement February 16, 1995 I will be prepared to discuss these options at the March board meeting. cerely, uèkl GGU/smk attachments cc: J. A. DePasquale J. W. Jenkins R. H. Connock, Jr. WOJj I oz a~no~ OOOZ 'xOJddV Áa^Jns PU] ~ ® N ....- -U C . Q) ";v, U ~@::r:« .- 0 LO <J> n ....- (j) ....- Q)~ o ..0 . c 01'0 N -u - Q) W Q) 0 V >-. -+-' C ::J o U Q) L o E Q) ....0 « o ..-- cD Q) -+-' ::J o 0:::: -u Q) c cr> ,j) ....- o c -u Q) Q) o ® Q) <5 <.> If) S?;t ¡ ~ "- cr, ,....: V) X L.J 8 ;?o :z: /~ ( ~ \ "\ (") ~ t ..., \, .,"-\ ~) \\ " "- ~,'\ " ."\ ", ~ '. ~. "\ " "" "- " ~, ~ .~,~ \~. \"'~ .... ;, "~ " \ \\ I" . " ® C"J '<--- c.o I..w i-- ..:::J o Q::- ....- c Q) E Q) <J> o W ~ Q) ....- c Q) <.> E . o -u ~ 0 --- 0 ~ ....- <J> C o U <J> Q) cr> <.> C C .- ou:; U; 'x :.ë; <l> ~O 0.. E Q) t- w Q) ....- o :z: -( t'£\ % 2 0 0 ~ ¡: ~ 0- Q 0 II . ® I II I II II I !::! ~ -0 .s. C1) C1) U c @:I:« .~ 0 .c c> II) I"'") _ m ..... C1)~ o ..Q . c· 0 rt) ~ w -0 C1) C1) c> >.. ~ c: ~ o U Q) '- o E Q) ..0 « I o .-- CD Q) --- ~ o a::: . OZ 9¡nO~ OOOZ ·xOJddV WOJj I Á9^Jns PU] ® ( -0 C1) c: 0\ .¡¡; ..... o c -0 C1) Q) o ® C"J ..-. CO :z C1) o u (./) /~ Q; - ..... c c C1) C1) E u C1) E . II) 0-0 0 .... 0 w - 0 .... ..... II) C1) 0\ II) U C c: C·- 0 2~ u II) x Q. 'Õ C1) E -- C1) 00 t- ëÞ II Õ L...J :z .. ;P-ßI-)?¿ ;75". c7 "/ á5: ;Z,Ç J- MAR .~, 3~ '~::-.~_..-..........- ~~. MEgl~ SUPED'-". ------... ",. '" . March 21, 1995 Route 633 Albemarle County Mr. Daniel Naude Route 1, Box 363-D North Garden, VA. 22959 Dear Mr. Naude: This is in reference to your letter dated March 6, 1995 regarding improvements to Route 633, as well as structure no. 6029 over the Norfolk and Southern Railroad. The concerns outlined in your letter are valid and appreciated. The Department is currently in the process of discussing potential improvements to this bridge with the railroad company. It is requested that they review the possibility of upgrading this structure to an unrestricted (weight limit), two-lane facility and turn the maintenance over to the Department. This is not a standard practice, but one worth investigating. Another alternative will be to prioritize the upgrading of this bridge into the County's Secondary Six Year Plan for improvement funds. By copy of this letter, I am informing the County of your concerns as well as our review. We will consider your request for inclusion into the County's priority list for improvements when revisions to this plan occur. The Department will advise you of options for these upgrades once our review is complete. Should you have any questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, A. G. Tucker AGT/ldw cc: Ms. Ella Carey Mr. B. Sprinkel Mr. W. Cilimberg ( _..!~_@Jt__t.:;t~:_ î B24grj ., , 1. UPGRADE RAILROAD BRIDGE ON ROUTE 633 I .~. 'RD OF SUPEF¡\/' ~ .-.."",--:a.~ ..."'........... EAST -"'--.--..~ ".-.--^-.. . SUBJECT: 2. COMPLETE PAVING UNPAVED PORTION OF ROUTE 633 EAST. WE THE UNDERSIGNED CITIZENS, PETITION ALBEMARLE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO COMPLETE THE UNPAVED PORTION OF ROUTE 633 EAST AND FOR THE BOARD TO REQUEST THE RAILROAD COMPANY TO BUILD A NEW BRIDGE ACROSS THE RAILROAD. IF THE BRIDGE IS IN SUCH POOR CONDITION FOR IT TO BE DOWNGRADED FROM 11 TONS TO 3 TONS, THEN IT rr-- IS TIME FOR IT TO BE REBUILT TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 1994..:) CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, FIRE ENGINES, AMBULANCES, SCHOOL BUSES, FARM EQUIPMENT, ALL NEED CONVENIENT AND SAFE ACCESS ACROSS THE BRIDGE FROM BOTH SIDES. TO EXPECT THIS EQUIPMENT TO TAKE THE LONG . WAY ROUND IS NOT ONLY RIDICULOUS AND BEHIND THE TIMES, BUT WE, THE TAXPAYERS IN THIS SECTION OF THE COUNTY, ARE NOT GETTING THE SERVICES FOR THE TAXES WE PAY. - HOMES COULD BURN DOWN BY THE TIME FIRE ENGINES HAVE GONE THE LONG WAY AROUND. LIVES COULD BE LOST BECAUSE EMERGENCY VEHICLES ARE DELAYED DUE TO POOR ROAD OR BRIDGE CONDITIONS. SCHOOL BUSES USE ROUTE 633 EAST AND NEED A SAFE ROAD AND BRIDGE - ESPECIALLY FOR WINTER - WET, SNOW AND ICE CONDITIONS. AS DO POSTAL AND DELIVERY SERVICES. _ JAUNT, MEDICAL AND EMERGENCY SERVICES FOR THE SICK, DISABLED . AND THE AGED. . . THERE IS INCREASED TRAFFIC USING 633 EAST DUE TO WALNUT CREEK PARK AS WELL AS THROUGH TRAFFIC BETWEEN ROUTE 29 AND ROUTE 20. UPGRADING THE BRIDGE AND ROUTE 633 EAST WILL: - REDUCE THE COST OF ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AND SNOW REMOVAL. - IMPROVE SNOW REMOVAL ABILITY, SAFETY, AND EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS. - REDUCE ACCIDENTS DUE TO DANGEROUS CURVES, PASSING LARGE VEHICLES, AND DIRT ROAD CORRUGATIONS. - REDUCE DUST LEVEL. OUR CITIZENS PAY THE SAME FOR THEIR CARS AS ANY OTHER COUNTY CITIZEN OOES, YET CANNOT KEEP THEM CLEAN OR PROTECT THEM FROM GRAVEL CHIPS. . . NAME I ~7/~e&¡ e Y . 2/- ØJf 12 d---t £-él¿ C'~ ~. (}(JLÁ)~ q.£~r~ ~~ C;V~ ~. Ì)avt;Ø Trm/i¡ t þJ ~ ~~d),~~ C0t- £; ~ .... ,. VU) S~ Â~ P/&Vø C/ku-- ~' ~, L-- ~;~"- , \.... , I .~~ N~ (!~ ti ~ UNDERSIGNED: ADDRESS .~ I &e~ 30?f)z'~J{4 l( fr /1 / ..- I \ 'l 'SCe 0 ß I r ( I ( , 3Leoß ( ( tj t 3 H. I ( . , ¡ l 3.Jt6 ( C 1<- /f If 1/ I I 3~;¿ If /../ It {I ßIa:L /1 i¡ J ( 3 '-.z II ( I U L' 3'?- I./J~. My 5~3 ~fv ' hart '20'J ~~ ßV7¡ 3í YJ j ·1 II II /1 II ~J51' ?1~~ ¡, ßif.357 fl?~~ .. . UNDERSIGNED : itI6,~· ADDRESS it:: ?:;I /J tJ í'. l J,/\ /. ¿; ;4M (F. T / DD;" ~ LOI/A~/.., c' l a'lk JII# I,. / .&y 3)'/ (j"'''.tÆ, v{ ¿:;;/z~ :::!1¿r::' Ç;[n:.Pu 15~ R~ \ l30t Jì) rlø"'-¡'!' (;q..Je<1 2¿'îs-? ~4 If'¡ 11 r ß"<1 k. FI1R V>¡ ,o+. l 66'!- ?'6,</--ß Nrit'f-tr. 0ð.f{dwrLf«. J~ 4.u~ C1 . , zz.'G1 /fJ /Il 1(+. I ~i:- ~ lfð f1 'woJ.cL AJ¿ú..,J¿.J 71oµ.J..:J ~ U4,. 2: '&'1>1 - ÎJ~ ~ r&¡ 8o'X:"'ð7~ N.~ YFjz7W5 J~ c.¿Ji~.jljL)y . R+.I,I SOl< 37'1/ ¡.jor~{,.. ~,Ue;,.).)..'ž<;r e~\;.~Q.~~- ~~, <á.j..?:>'l,\ ~~~~\ ~ 0.. ~ Pr-¡ ßut,~l 'Xdt~.()",. 'I-~~~ 1Yla.RJj, s· ~ /2.1./, f3òy.. 3EJ1 NDfli¡.¡ ~iJ, v~. 2¿'l5¡ -z.~ JJ. ¡../. ~ ~ If'r. ) - fS 67\, 3 'f l.. C~....;Lb / '-';; - " I11txf~ sß~ t2R'~(, & ~~ &w1A1J.c VM .:2&'i6¡ < 'aJ~~ {'"u<"j/~ t/- ~ 9<1/ ~. ( ~ \ .À)l./] t- ~'V ~_ ~ l/) /..;: C~..?; /vr~ ~ '~~~'-\j...,,\ ~.~ ~,-«-,,-~\\,..\ "'S'~~~'.r-.... r ~ ' . \ '-Û'-:......~.\\~,_ \.....::'À.. ....~ \r",(':\.. " , . ~ )J~f{.~ E jL{) ¡4 ~ d ß vt rtTú~ ¡dtV.w!7)1f. )11 ¿u.~ C:kù# ) (JJ(}øh)/~1 r:~? (ð, ~ f? -ry()~ ~~,~[~tL~63Ì) (i l.-L1..-~ ~- 2'>"'<:'í/ ;;<¡lr1?~ Ii &~GY!lQ ~ J. ;Jr;'<' Ý k Cd! , r! ~ ftl C1...~, ð.L vW µ J},qrrr1yJj . " UNDERSIGNED: ff( ~:;-~;r[yid ~ M /6Af'J'ù- /.,. H 'I' f<{),~ I..{} N ~-t;ti ¿~c-q/ "<4/ -zz9ry Po. ß fill 4 3 7( (.I'I...th~1 VIf 2 1- 9 S J a,./ "21c, '2. 2...Li ç. f!-t I G¿z¡. 5 7 5 --rJ. ¿'1-. I t ,oi.j {;~1' I, ¡U! ~.)7'1~ td¿'A.<:~/Vtl 1;<75 ó\ 1- r / f;ô ì<. J ~>,4 {:lIe_~ 1.-' .'llf tit. 7 1'1:3 I 19,,¿&!-3~D4/~G~ f;'¿ Y. C ¿JU~C ~t1l"V e.o (I~~) '£ çu ¡// f. U4 5~ /J" Cc)vc-c,Af~J~N 12<1 C~t>C!..~..:(I"L ..<~~ S-w Ie; CaùL Cntt'àeî' ?-l. Co\LJ...,)u\.lll\. I GCc. 2-2_ -=, ? I David P. Bowennan Charlottesville Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Mrs. Angela Tucker, Virginia Department P. O. Box 2013 Charlottesville, VA Dear Mrs. Tucker: COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 April 7, 1995 Resident Engineer of Transportation 22902-0013 Sally H. Tomas Samuel Miler Enclosed is the resolution adopted by the Board on April 5, 1995 relative to the Carrsbrook Drive/Route 29 North crossover. If I may be of further help, please do not hesitate to call. EWC:len Cc; C/;'M),ø/;1 ~/3 Sincerely, 0ßß A [)J (: {Ù~/ E~Carey, Cler , CMC Board of County Sup rvisors * Printed on recycled paper RES 0 L UTI 0 N WHEREAS, the realignment of a crossover on Route 29 North with Carrsbrook Drive has been pending for many years; and WHEREAS, after public hearings and numerous discussions, a con census has been reached with the residents in Carrsbrook, Northfields, Westmoreland and Fieldbrook concerning this project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does hereby express its support for option 1 (shown on the attached sketch) showing a reconfigured (not relocated) entrance of Carrsbrook Drive with Route 29 North (the crossover being relocated from the southern- most entrance of Better Living, Inc. to a more centered position opposite the mid-point of the property) and, if found to be necessary, the location of four-way stop signs at the intersec- tion of Carrsbrook Drive with Clarke Lane. * * * * * I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on April 5, 1995. c&)!!oar0J C~ðuperVisors · Q) 0_ u C> V)C> X II o '-- - 0...:;:""'" 0... « « W Q::: « (J)W (".I> Q::: WO I- ~ =:) 0 0... o ~ 0 O::::m U) Q::: Q::: « u c o ----- >- Wl.d 0-' -0 """" 0..> ::<W _:I: --'0 >- >- -' « w "" c.... -' =" > (/) W >- >- o -' "" « :I: o >- W -' 2 => 2 ~ ~ I ~~ I ~~ I E2 I m I --/' I I I I I I I I I c6l ::z I I I I I I I I I I I I, _ ! \ J tJ r, I I I I I I I I I f-.. ill L.en I ..q- I I I I I I I I I I I I I / --.J m U) ~~ 'JO >jOOJqSJJ J ~~ 'Z ~.'. " ~ ~ ~ , ~\ ~~..."."'~ ~ ~ ' )i ~~\ ~, I ~ I I I I I I \~ ~~ ~~ ..~ L... « w >- -' V> O=> -' 0:: 0.-- '-" o >-2 V> « Q::-' L... v 0> Q) C (f) ~ 0 (f) CL o X '-- LLJ 0.. - I , COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Public Comment on Carrsbrook Drive Alignment with Route 29 North AGENDA DATE: March 8,1995 ITEM NUMBER: ACTION: x INFORMATION: SUBJECTIPROPOSALIREQUEST: Solicit public comment on Carrsbrook Drive alignment CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: ATIACHMENTS: Yes STAFF CONT ACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff REVIEWED BY: R i* BACKGROUND: At the Board's request, Ms. Angela Tucker, Resident Engineer for VDOT, will be present to present and discuss three optiolts for the alignment of Carrsbrook Drive with potential crossovers on Route 29 North. Public comment will be solicited for dec Slon- .aking by the Board. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board, after the public comment period, provide its desire for the alignment of Carrsbrook Driv with Route 29 North to VDOT for planning purposes. .5.038 " <J:: w cr: <J:: w OJ> N- cr: o W I- ~ ::)0 O~ cr::rn (/) cr: cr: <J:: U <l> 80 (/);: X II o ....: c... ~ c... « --/ .- WW u-' -0 a:: a:: Cl.> _w ::=I ~u >- .- ....I <: W a:: W ....I ....I '> '" W .- .- o ....I a:: <: I u >- W ....I Z ::;, Z '-" ;;;;:W > a:: -::;, ....I..... a::z Wa:: .....::;, ........ W CD ---1 rn (/) --.J CD :z: a:: W :::¡ -' o u ~ 'JO > OOJqSJJ J ... <:.- w'" 5::;, ......a:: 0..... '-"0 .....z "'<: 9:...... ... 01 C --- C/) x l..W ¡ . --../ I l- I ww \ u-' -0 IYIY -..J Ct.> \ :::;;w CD _I Z IY -, u \ w ::J \ -' Q) 0 '-> 0_ ., 00 (/)0 X II I 0 I ...... - I CL~ >-- CL l- I _J <t: « w I IY ,"J I ....J _J > I U) W l- I I- 0 ....J I IY <( I U I I I \ - ) "- I "- - - - - - - - I 'JO >jOOJqSJJD « I - - - - _ Pé)iD)OIé)èj w 0:: I ,-) « I I f-.. w <.D ~ OJ > ken I N - -.: - 0:: I I I 0 N W c I I I -- ~ 0 I . JO >jOOJqSJJD] :=:> 0 I I 0 CL I 0 0 I 0:: >- I 0:::: CD '~J I I _J I (j) :z: ::0 I 0:: :z: I 0:: / I « I u \ I I I I I I I I \ <.:> u.. 2: \ -w I <{ 2:1Y wI- -' ::0 -' V> l- I 0::0 IY - I -' IY wZ o I- I-IY I <.:> 1-::0 I 0 wu.. ,....2: m I V> <( I ~-' u.. I \ I -0 Oò Q) C (f) ....... 0 (f) CL 0 X ...... -..J UJ Q. co (j) r ~TE________________~~~~~ ----------------------- ~ 111M m. ---~_q'~t!!i_~----------------- AI:HO\ ITIM_ _ç:Z?~~~--- DEFERREDUNrIL_~~------------ Form. 3 7/25/86 I ... .. /¡ ai _....-.~... ._--.....'..,,~;... -..",.,.,. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Full Gospel Assembly of Charlottesville Amendment to Albemarle County Service Authority (ACSA) Jurisdictional Area AGENDA DATE: March 1, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: -tJ; ,'\, ( ~) ,.:t,) - :7-7-tP3tP/.,2 V ø 9'J INFORM A TION: ACTION: SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREQUEST: Request to schedule a public hearing for amendment to the ACSAjurisdictional area for public water and sewer for Tax Map 32 Parcel 30, CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMA TION: ATTACHMENTS: ¡--- STAFF CONTACnS): Messrs. Tucker, Cilimberg, Benish REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: The property consists of 1349 acres desclibed as TIl" Map 32 Parcel 30. The propel1y, bordered by Profitt Road (Route 649) to the south and approximately 0.2 mile east of Route 29, was added to the Hollymead Growth Area as part of the Towers Land Trust Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CP A-92-05) in October 1993 (see Attachment A). The Comprehensive Plan states that an objective and oveniding policy guiding the planning and provision of utilities is that public water and sewer services be provided to the Urban Areas and Communities as an incentive to growth. DISCUSSION: The ACSA jwisdictional map shows that "water only" is cUlTently available to this property and to the prope11ies immediately adjacent to the east and west of it. Both water and sewer are available to the parcels along the south side of Profitt Road, including those parcels directly adjacent to its southern property line (see Attachments B and C). While this area drains n0l1hward into the N0l1h Fork Rivanna River basin and is serviced by the Camelot Waste Water Treatment Plant, extension of lines from the treatment plant to serve this site would be cost prohibitive to the church. A more likely option would be to provide service by pumping to the sewer lines under construction for the Forest Ridge development across Profitt Road fi-om the site. RECOMMENDA TION: Stafffmds this request meets the Comprehensive Plan cliteria for Jurisdictional Area designation and recommends the Board state a resolution of intent to forward this request to public hearing to be held on April 5, 1995. r I,> "' " I\\} , /D;,I 1\..h1' 95,024 "-S-~R (iù R n ~n,~, ÙI~ fJS..J;L1-S-~-,... ~1 FIB 2 3œi L ..~"....._. - r-¡'c.RD OF SUPER\! ' .' ;,~.."._.,..:_...........-_.._wo"---~,··,,,,,··,,,,, ... . .. , . I .' "'-....-..., \ '. \ f ..~ I l. , 1 , I I ) ( .--<' I -....'-.... I J I ~-'---'h \, ~ß I , IATT~~HME~T AI \ \. ') . ,~... !; I; , I I ....., ...}.-../ .< 0________· / / ¡ :1 :\ } I )~ MAP 22: COMMUNITY OF HOll YMEAD I LAND USE PATTERNS Ii 'I I OFFICE/REGIONAL SERVICE I~ _....~ INDUSTRIAL SERVICE I, :·1 (1 ;j ;j':I; ¡ . !J ~ :1 'I ,{ OFFICE SERVICE I REGIONAL SERVICE MAP SYMBOLS I OPEN SPACE AND RURAL AREAS NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE VILLAGE SERVICE .... PROPOSED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ... COMMUNITY AND VILLAGE BOUNDARIES VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL I I I \ TRANSMISSION LINES ..,/ RAILROAD TRACKS \111 /,-,.1 MOUNTAINS HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ì ¡¡ '1 STATE OR PRIVATE ROADS ../ Y....// SCALE .',..r..\.. {' ..1 '- ¡'/<" JEEP/fiRE TRAILS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC UNIVERSITY Of VIRGINIA " STREAMS Û SCHOOL RECREATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL 37 I o 2000 ,.., .000 ,.., . 8 ...... ~y~~ .t-.Ì'. I '--/~j1/ " 48 'Ç / tJ-f"-J 'i /\ ''1 ~ . ~ . " 31 / ~ ~'" , '\ / '" \ \ "\ \ vi ALBEMARLE COUNTY 20 I ATTACHMENT B I SCALE IN fEET - '100 ..0. , RIVANNA AND CHARLOTTESVIL.LE DISTRICTS SECTION 32 ... --- \'" ALULMAItLi:. (jOUNI ( ¡ATTACHMENT cl . ,"', ..:C'" ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. /. l FULL GOSPEL ASSEMBL Y PROPERTY : " .. ,.. '> o .. .. .. ;! .. ø CLOVER'S AIRPORT ACRES D.B350PQ.193~D.8.~8pt.:¡"I-D.B.364P.501i-D.8.35ZPv.75 (A)- D.8. 3~ 1>0.5 ~ ACREAGE PARCELS ' " o SPRINGfIELo DB. 594 I: 371 B . DB. 645pQ. 88 I~_ ...J 'CALI ~ nn 100 -. - 'f' RNANNA DISTRICT SECTION :3 2A. l " '\ David P. Bowennan Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Ha1l Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ~e/ FROM: DATE: April 6, 1995 SUBJECT: Ordinance adopted April 5, 1995 Attached is a copy of an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 5, 1995: Ordinance No. 95-3(1), an ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 3, Amusements, of the Code of Albemarle, Virginia, changing operating hours in the Bingo Ordinance. EWC:len Attachment (1) cc: Honorable James Camblos Larry Davis, Esq. Melvin Breeden Municipal Code Corporation File * Printed on recycled paper ., ORDINANCE NO. 95-3(1) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 3, AMUSEMENTS OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of County Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 3, Amusements, is hereby amended and reordained by amending section 3-28, Limita- tions on Bingo Operations, as follows: Sec. 3-28. Limitations on Bingo Operations. Bingo games shall be conducted only on the days of the week designated in the permit. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between 6:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m., except on Saturdays and Sundays when the hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between 1:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. No build- ing or other premises shall be used by more than one organization on anyone calendar day to conduct bingo games. state law reference: § 18.2-340.9(D) of the Code of Virginia I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on April 5, 1995. ~J!fœrWr County ervisors · ... - David P Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 2965800 Charles S. Martin RI\'<1llnd Charlotte Y Humphris Jd,k Jouel1 Walter F Perkins While Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scot!svdle Sally H. Thomas Sdll1uel Miller TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ~C/ FROM: DATE: April 6, 1995 SUBJECT: Ordinance adopted April 5, 1995 Attached is a copy of an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 5, 1995: Ordinance No. 95-3(1), an ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 3, Amusements, of the Code of Albemarle, Virginia, changing operating hours in the Bingo Ordinance. EWC:len Attachment (1) cc: Honorable James Camblos Larry Davis, Esq. Melvin Breeden M3Ricipal Code corporation v.fi'i Ie * Printed on recycled paper · '" .... ORDINANCE NO. 95-3(1} AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 3, AMUSEMENTS OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of County supervIsors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 3, Amusements, is hereby amended and reordained by amending section 3-28, Limita- tions on Bingo Operations, as follows: Sec. 3-28. Limitations on Bingo operations. Bingo games shall be conducted only on the days of the week designated in the permit. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between 6:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m., except on Saturdays and Sundays when the hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between 1:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. No build- ing or other premises shall be used by more than one organization on anyone calendar day to conduct bingo games. state law reference: § IB.2-340.9(D) of the Code of Virginia I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on April 5, 1995. &~r0d County ervisors '" . /> I .' i COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY \, \k'~ . I [) ( ? ,c· ~\ ~ AGENDA TITLE: Expansion of Bingo Hours of Operation AGENDA DATE: March 1, 1995 ITEM NUMBEß: /-~, ¿ )~,/', .i~__'-' ACfION: x :?..::J: c:J 3 ¿;') ~ ,¿ 9 2- INFORMAtION: SUBJECfIPROPOSALlREQUEST: Request to expand hours of operations for conducting bingo on Sundays. CONSENT AGENDA: ACfION: INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CONT ACf(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Breeden REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Staff has received a request from representatives from the Senior Center asking that the County's bingo ordinance be amended to allow an expansion of the hours of operation to conduct bingo on Sundays from the current 6:00 p.m. to 11 :00 p.m. to a proposed 1 :00 p.m. to 11 :00 p.m. This request is based on a belief that expanding such hours will provide for additional fund raising opportunities on Sunday afternoons to conduct bingo. DISCUSSION: Due to an oversight, an application to conduct bingo for another non-profit organization was recently approved erroneously allowing that organization to operate .lÌom 3:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. on SW1day afternoons. Once it was brought to staffs attention that the application was erroneously approved in violation of the ordinance, the organization was notified to cease its Sunday afternoon bingo until the issue could be revisited. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing to amend Section 3.28 of the County Code of Albemarle to allow bingo to be conducted between the hours of 4:00 p.m. to 1100 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays and 6:00 p.m. to 11 :00 p.m. on all other days of the week. Given some w1pleasant experiences in other jurisdictions with professional organizations conducting bingo, staff notes some concern about expanding potential hours of operations greatly that might encourage bingo to become more of a business for professional organizations selling their services to conduct such games as opposed to the current situation of bingo being used largely by fire departments, rescue squads and other non-profits for genuine fund raising activities conducted by their own members. --,·...,.----··,,......,_~"--n \ r~ ~ rÞ f! , ¡ 'f~; ~'.~ '-~--'. t!~" ~; )~ , , I ; , 823œ; 95.029 ¡ . . RD OF SUPEr:',' "CC'C.....""......_. .0.4._ ~ ; ~.. 3-#--;ß1~ ;?~~ß«'?~2- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 3, AMUSEMENTS OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of County Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 3, Amusements, is hereby amended and reordained by amending section 3-28, Limita- tions on Bingo Operations, as follows: Sec. 3-28. Limitations on Bingo Operations. Bingo games shall be conducted only on the days of the week designated in the permit. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between 6:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m., except on Saturdavs and Sundavs when the hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between 1:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. No build- ing or other premises shall be used by more than one organization on anyone calendar day to conduct bingo games. state law reference: § 18.2-340.9(D) of the Code of Virginia . ~~lOR t:q'? Þ c~ ~ tó ~ MN~ 0 /995 .""",..",,,.,,~,,,"'''''''o::........,>_ March 30, 1995 r,·~ 'Jr '".- ."'--""'~."....,. Board of Supervison AJbemarle County Albemarle County Office Bldg. 401 McIntire Road CharloUesville, VA 22902-4596 Dear Supervison: The Senior Center has requested an amendment to the County code to allow the Senior Center to hold bingo during Sunday afternoon hours from 1-5 p.m. . Our memben want to play during daylight hours in a non-smoking environment, which is not available e~where in the community. Many senion would prefer to not drive at night. We are aware the State may be rhangjng the roles and regulations regarding bingo in the next year or so, but respectfully request that you approve our request; we need this source of income for the Senior Center. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. ñ:k~ Donna M. Selle, President Board of Directon ~~J~ ~lli ~b~k, Executive Director . DMS:dIg 1180 Pepsi Place, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 (804) 974-7756 A United Way Certified Agency Fax: (804)974-7510 3- ß/-.2~. f/5 ¿)3/5"r e?;?'3 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5823 ¡~ March 20, 1995 ,...."'....,~""...·.......".,""~_~n'.-" . -".......-..-..."'-~...----~ Hunter E. Craig 338 Rio Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 RE: Request for Amendment of the Albemarle County Service Authority Jurisdictional Areas for Tax Map 56, Parcels 88, 88A, 89, 90, 90A and 93 Dear Mr. Craig: The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on March 15, 1995 set a public hearing for April 5, 1995 to review the above-noted request. Please note that you or your representative must be present for this meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, . . ~:f:::t:::.:;'- Director of Planning Co VWC/jcw ! 'I cc: Ella Carey ~ Ron Lilley t f COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY #/ ?~ AGENDA TITLE: La Hacienda ARB-F(SIGN)-95-02 AGENDA DATE: AprilS, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: 5Js. ¿J;:7t:1$; ..:¿j?Y ./ INFORMATION: ACfION: X REOUEST: Appeal, Condition of Certificate of Appropriateness for a wall sign. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: STAFF CONTACT(S): Mr. Tucker, Mr. Davis, Ms. Joseph REVIEWED BY: ATTACHMENTS: BACKGROUND: The sign was reviewed by the Architectural Review Board at its meeting on Tuesday, February 21, 1995. The ARB voted unanimously (3 :0) to grant a certificate of appropriateness for the wall sign with the following revisions: 1) Remove the changeable copy area on the proposed wall sign. 2) The white area of the wall sign should be masked with an opaque backing. This will allow only the green lettering and shamrock to shine through when the sign is lit. The applicant has provided a letter to explain the reason for his appeal. This is based on section 4.15.1 ,4.15.3,4.15.6,4.15.8, and 4.15.12.6. These sections all relate to the sign section of the ordinance. The appellant's letter and the ordinance sections are attached. DISCUSSION: The Zoning Ordinance in section 4.15.12.8 states that "no sign which would be visible fÌ'om any entrance corridor street shall be erected without issuance of a certificate of appropriateness by the architectural review board." This regulation was placed within the Zoning Ordinance when the sign ordinance was adopted in 1992 to enhance the aesthetic quality of the entrance corridors and reduce the amount of visual clutter. The revisions required for a certificate of appropriateness allow the applicant to advertise the establishment in the colors and design as proposed. The removal of the menu board increases the continuity that is being established within the corridors. The preponderance of information on menu boards eliminates the continuity and provides an element that contributes to the visual cacophony along the corridor. There have been no other menu boards approved for businesses other than gasoline stations since the sign ordinance was adopted. Because it has been the accepted policy for gas stations to advertise their price, special provisions were granted within the zoning ordinance to allow them to continue with this practice. (Section 4.15.12.3) Elimination of the illwnination of the white background of the wall sign also contributes to the continuity along the corridors. During the nighttime hours the light shines through the message portion of the sign, and makes the sign appear to be a channel lettered sign, rather than a lit box. This has been required of other businesses along the entrance corridor. RECOMMENDATION: Mum the decision of the Architectural Review Board. -'---- r~ @ Œ"t"~W~..Œ-· MAr? 0 915 95.049 ~ , j/-f" /'->~ f APPEAL On approximately January 30, 1995, I applied for a permit to put signs on my building on 250 East Pantops Mountain, known as La Hacienda. At this time, the Design Planner of the Zoning Department, Marcia Joseph, recommended that the decision be ~i~entbotbhe Architectural Review Board for approval. When asked what she based this decision on in accordance with the ordinance, and to send me a copy of that decision, I redeived a letter from Ms. Joseph on February 3. She used Section 4.15.12.8 of the ordinance and Section 4.15.12.6 of the ordinance as a basis of what she had~made her decision on. In reality, both sections of the ordinance gives her total authority to have approved my request. On February 21, I appeared before the Architectural Review Board. At that time Ms. Jaseph gave extensive reasons for the wall signs disapproval, which was totally based on opinion, rather than any sections of the ordinance. She then gave recommendations to allow the wall signs, but to deny the changeable oopy and to make the signs of opaque design. At this time, the Architectural Review Board, without establishing reason to approve or disapprove this under the guidelines of the ordinance just agreed to take the zoning staff recommendation. I received a written decision of this on February 22. After finding out that I had 10 days to appeal this decision, I nptified the Board of Supervisors:Office within the time frame. I bàse this appeal in part, but not limited to the items listed below. Sec. 4.15.1 -- Purpose and Intent To enable business to promote and identify their establishment. Sec. 4.15.3 -- Definitions Advertisement Sec. 4.15.6 -- Listed from my request. Prohibited Signs A to U -- none of which includes Sec. 4.15.8 E&G Content and Advertising Message A copy of the proposed sign is attached. The wall signs, as approved by the Zoning Department and the Architectural Revæœw Board would not serve the purpose, or even begin to justify the expense. It would defeat the purpose of the ~J ..-.<,,-.-""" ~ - 2 - advertising available according to the ordinance. Even though there are recent examples such as the Outback Steakhouse -- signs of all 4 sides of the building, Circuit City -- sign extending above roof line, Ponderosa Steak House -- signs on east and west side of building; possiblf these were issued a variance to do so, because all could have been denied arrording to the zoning ordinance. Again, I am not asking for or seeking a variance for special treatment, but only to be allowed to do what I am entitled to according to our Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance. Pictures and other ~ r J may be offered at time of appeal. '~L 111..1 . '_' 1)-4 I -11,' C' '-I :~, 4 ¡'II) ..... 11 , '.:14 'j: .25 P.02 .... ! :¡ iii b ~ m II> ~ ~ \~ li z iii -i ~ }~ x t Ih 'j ~ .J ~ t\t ~ f:l .,' ~'! ~ t q'\~' ' ¡·'of 0 ~: I C t~~ ',1 Z ¡'j :! , -i I!! -- --( ~ I I .:¡ .. ~ fW'\ ~ ("V\ i' I; 0 } ,II ~ t ~ ~ H (] -{ i ~,; , " ... ~ 0 N . . ,: ." ~ ¡!.¡ ~ '<. -1 (f\ :,~ n I ;~ 0 I' ;: 'V ;t ~. ~ . , .. I· . ¡. : z 0 ~ &¿vJ I '< z .~ ~ '><,- ~z. ~ ~'~ I tII \' - ~~ I m § ::s:~ ;:: & r?\ I ." '0 C)I. :II §f ~ 0 & ~Ú) CI 1 # f¡ 0 1:\ 1 m i ~<f\ ;r:. p :u 0:;1 8 J r \J~ 'V ;;¡ ,"0 P ~ ,j~ 0 9 ]I III ~' ~v -G" ª 0 ~...; ~~ " VI "II. ~ ... ..... ~, ~ ~~ m o, 0 . ;;. ~2 z 0 ~ ~~ )- ';T '" ~ z U 'r-.l\> .. .. ... .... { 'J¡- -..J ~ ~ .l~ x oÒ Õ 5 ...... z :é or ~,- W =- ~ ~~ ~ T-.$: .~ 1'>(\\ W ~ o~ r- ffi~ r~ f) o. n ~~~ ~ -> ~ c I ~;ri ...:I. II> 7:... ~ .... 1\\ )~ fCe. i , .... c., ~ ß õ ~ ~~ "C'( -f \1- Z m -p ¡ ) í ..1:. r Ó \1 .,\ \J _\'L Z .. " .... .r r ~ ~ ;¡ --( 0 r. ~ I: " 0 z: » ~ S~ II) ~ ~~~ z ¡¡¡ ri )- '& ~ ~ o CD 11::) X '< rr, ,.. 0 '^ I'f- ;II ~('O ¡:¡ :¡1 0 ~v 0 s: ~ ~ .. Ñ ... i 1õ õ ~ ~""' !11 ~ r ~-.( ~ ~ 0 =1' J;; O~ ", X z 0 m l ~ t 8 III ç ; » z -< y (ft) -- 1,y t ./ . /i~ ß¡ A. ¡¡In, 1. r~ Æ/1 ,/¿.l J.. 2. ~ 2J ,d COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Zoning 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5875 FAX (804) 972-4060 TOO (804) 972-4012 I. February 22, 1995 Corven D. & Katie Flynn P.O. Box 5849 Charlottesville, Virginia 22905 Re: ARB-F(SIGN)-95-02 La Hacienda Tax Map 78 Parcel 55A2 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Flynn: '" The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on Tuesday, February 21, 1995. The board voted unanimoust,y (3:0) to grant a certificat~ of appropriateness for the sign with the following revisions: 1) Remove the changeable copy area on the proposed wall sign. 2)}the white area of the wall sign should be masked with an opaque backing. This will 'allow only the green lettering and shamrock to shine through whe~ the sign is lit. If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please call me.' Sincerely, ~ Marcia J osep Design Planner cc: Holiday Signs ~ I ~Þ~5 COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Zoning 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 (804) 296-5875 FAX (804) 972-4060 TOD (804) 972-4012 · i ') L ; P. q .." J.JF MAR 2 7 1995 ,I' , '" FiD 0;: SUPER";c -<-"".,.,,,",,,~,,,.---, MEMORANDUM To: Ella Carey, Board of Supervisors Marcia Joseph ~ March 22, 2995 From: Date: Re: La Hacienda Appeal Section 4.15.12.8 of the Zoning Ordinance requires a certificate of appropriateness for all signs that are visible and erected on an Entrance Corridor. Mr. Corven Flynn submitted wall signs for review by the ARB, his property is located on Route 250E, an Entrance Corridor. The site is located on tax map 78 parcel 55A2 in the Rivanna Magisterial District. The property is zoned HC Highway Commercial. The signs were reviewed by the ARB during their meeting on February 21, 1995. The ARB approved the signs, if the sign application was revised to eliminate the menu board (changeable letters). Mr. Flynn is appealing the decision of the ARB because he would like to keep the changeable letter area on the sign. David P Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 2965800 Charles S. Martm Rivanlhì Charlotte Y. Humph", Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkms WhllpH,,!1 Forrest R. Marshall, ,Jr ScottsVltle Sally H Thomas S,Hl1Upl Milkl March 7, 1995 Mr. Corven D. Flynn La Hacienda 250 East Pantops Mt. PO Box 5849 Charlottesville, VA 22905 Dear Mr. Flynn: This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated March 2, 1995, appealing the decision of the Architectural Review Board made on February 21, 1995. This appeal has been scheduled to be heard by the Board of Supervisors on April 5, 1995, at 10:30 a.m. the Board meets in Room #7 on the Second Floor of the County Office Building. Any materials you wish mailed to the Board on this request should be in the hands of the Clerk by 4:00 p.m. on March 29, 1995. Sincerely, ~!!+ c!!J/)~!::¡fCMC EWC:mms cc: Marcia Joseph V. Wayne Cilimberg Robert W. Tucker, Jr. <Ð Printed on recycled paper .. LA HACIENDA 250 East Pantops Mt. P.O Box 5849 Charlottesville, VA 22905 Telephone (804) 295-0258 Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 March 2-1-995-- ~--~-- . . . , - rl ~ \1" í~ (..) Ir- :, , ,J ( ;~~ \ ;"~ ! . \~i .,,·3. Re: To appeal decision ARB-F(SIGN)-95-02 La Hacienda l....,~~~___",-,..··",.,'_ë."·····- ""D 0... SU°I=D\;]" th r,'. _n, . _.-........~.----~ I regret that I find it necessary to appeal the decision of the Architectural Review Board, made on February 21, 1995. A copy of the decision trom Ms. Joseph, Department of Zoning, is attached and requested to be a part of this appeal. I found this necessary after obtaining a zoning ordinance book trom the Department of Zoning, and after extensive study, noted in 30-6-8 of Appeals that I am only allowed ten (10) days trom their decision to make such an appeal. I was not notified of the avenues of appeal or the limited amount of time entitled to me according to the ordinance. Fortunately, I was able to learn of this before the appeal expiration time. According to the ordinance, I would have had to accept their decision. I base this appeal in part, but not limited to the items mentioned below: a) Sec. 4.1.5.1 -- Purpose and Intent b) Sec. 4.15.3 -- Definitions c) Sec. 4.15.6 -- Prohibited Signs d) Sec. 4.15.8 -- Content and Advertising Message e) Sec. 4.15.12.6 -- Highway commercial I respect the need of a zoning ordinance and the possible need for an Architectural Review Board to help administer these ordinances. However, I do not feel it was the intent of the ordinance, nor do I find anywhere in the ordinance, that rulings can be made on personal opinions such as "we try to discourage, or "we feel would be incompatible". I believe we would all have to agree that as board members change, opinions would also change. In making this appeal, I'm requesting to be allowed to install the signs that I originally requested, in which I read to understand that I am entitled to do so according to the zoning ordinance. Not being allowed to do this will defeat my purpose and result in wasted expense. In conclusion, further information can be made available. After 25 years of being in business, it is necessary for the survival of my business at this time to be allowed any and all legal avenues of advertising available to me. Respectfully submitted, ~~~. Corven D. Flynn, Owner c~) f¿~ -¡pt 1.2. ',. 1,d COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Zoning 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5875 FAX (804) 972-4060 TDD (804) 972·4012 February 22, 1995 Corven D. & Katie Flynn P.O. Box 5849 Charlottesville, Virginia 22905 Re: ARB-F(SIGN)-95-02 La Hacienda Tax Map 78 Parcel 55A2 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Flynn: The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on Tuesday, February 21, 1995. The board voted unanimously (3:0) to grant a certificate of appropriateness for the sign with the following revisions: 1) Remove the changeable copy area on the proposed wall sign. 2) The white area of the wall sign should be masked with an opaque backing. This will allow only the green lettering and shamrock to shine through when the sign is lit. If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please call me. Sincerely, ~ Marcia Josep Design Planner cc: Holiday Signs ... 1: ¡¡¡ t> m VI tii z ¡¡¡ .... X '" g f1 ~ ~ c c: z 2! r. Lò ~ c ~ :» :><. o ... i n o ¡: ~ .. »' z o f. -< z ~ C1I ~ § ~ '0 g ~ ~ ~ P :n ~ ~ ¡¡; p o ]I ~ ~ m o Z ~ .. ." l:. X Õ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ... §r I t :0 P ~ If ~. >< '" ~ ~ . ;:;.. o ~ ~ ~ $. { IÒ 5 ~ n -~J § \\::: ...r:..Ò .>" ;¡ o r:: » z )- ~ X o ;II ï:: c o .. ... õ !;J ~ X :n B ~ » z .. ~ ~ z l II> ;¡ ¡ l_ L .11,1. ~ ~ 'h\ò fY' ~ ~ ~~ ~ t ~ t'è. G'\~' N) ~~~ -- --( ~ (r\ ~ rtI {]è~ ~ ~N "<. -i rn r.-. 2:. \~ ~\ ~ -.<,- ~~~ :s:~ (}7:. s:: Ú\ r.\ ~Cf\ ,,~ ,~Ii\ ~IV ~I ~~ ~2 'r-J\> \J\" l~ "- ~,- . ç\?= i~ T.... 1\\ )~ ~~ r '1\ \J ~ -i Õ Z " c: VI -i () ~ m ¡) ;n c ~ .s.~ KI '"/'C"l o \ 0> -< " ï -C. r. L II) l'\:) (ì\ ~^ 31 s:: Ñ µ. r ~. , . lõ ~ o -: ", . o ... -< ~~ ~~\ ~ ;C Q ~~ J~ '-' .~"("Jß\ ...~ ï'J ~~~ ¡1;c. i 4~ _\'L ~ c.-.. ~ '& '-,. ,_.I~ I ..,:11_, } ~ ,...~.Io. ~~,:'f ~""'." '~·.orl_ .....t;fIiI).;....Io"..... ':".. ~~~ . I ~I'-j_,-J Hü "J' 11, ':14 ~,. ',~ W·o' ..:r' , ~ 1 t 'k -; I' ':I: .:::5 P.ù2 r .I . .' '\.. , ¡ ! -G" , i O, , --- , ~ I'f' ~('O ~v ~~ ~~ ~...( o~ t y \. LA HACIENDA 250 East Pantops Mt. P.O Box 5849 Charlottesville, VA 22905 Telephone (804) 295-0258 Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 Marcþ 2,--1995-~"--:~' ~ ì)~ @i ~ Ii. J._..~2.- ) 1 \\ ~-391) ··-'L _._,,__J '__L~~D OF SU~_~.~'.t:;.; ... Re: To appeal decision ARB-F(SIGN)-95-02 La Hacienda I regret that I find it necessary to appeal the decision of the Architectural Review Board, made on February 21, 1995. A copy of the decision from Ms. Joseph, Department of Zoning, is attached and requested to be a part of this appeal. I found this necessary after obtaining a zoning ordinance book from the Department of Zoning, and after extensive study, noted in 30-6-8 of Appeals that I am only allowed ten (10) days from their decision to make such an appeal. I was not notified of the avenues of appeal or the limited amount of time entitled to me according to the ordinance. Fortunately, I was able to learn of this before the appeal expiration time. According to the ordinance, I would have had to accept their decision. I base this appeal in part, but not limited to the items mentioned below: \ a) Sec. 4.1.5.1 -- Purpose and Intent b) Sec. 4. 15.3 -- Definitions c) Sec. 4.15.6 -- Prohibited Signs d) Sec. 4.15.8 -- Content and Advertising Message e) Sec. 4.15.12.6 -- Highway commercial I respect the need of a zoning ordinance and the possible need for an Architectural Review Board to help administer these ordinances. However, I do not feel it was the intent of the ordinance, nor do I find anywhere in the ordinance, that rulings can be made on personal opinions such as "we try to discourage, or "we feel would be incompatible". I believe we would all have to agree that as board members change, opinions would also change. In making this appeal, I'm requesting to be allowed to install the signs that I originally requested, in which I read to understand that I am entitled to do so according to the zoning ordinance. Not being allowed to do this will defeat my purpose and result in wasted expense. In conclusion, further information can be made available. After 25 years of being in business, it is necessary for the survival of my business at this time to be allowed any and all legal avenues of advertising available to me. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Corven D. Flynn, Owner ,. :,~/-:) l:) j¿", tJ.J;i.¡!/rJ/ 2/-1 .#r/1,t.t 22 I~ :23 /d- COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Department of Zoning 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5875 FAX (804) 9724060 roo (804) 972-4012 February 22, 1995 Corven D. & Katie Flynn P.O. Box 5849 Charlottesville, Virginia 22905 Re: ARB-F(SIGN)-95-02 La Hacienda Tax Map 78 Parcel 55A2 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Flynn: The Albemarle County Architectural Review Board reviewed the above noted item at its meeting on Tuesday, February 21, 1995. The board voted unanimously (3:0) to grant a certificate of appropriateness for the sign with the following revisions: 1) Remove the changeable copy area on the proposed wall sign. 2) The white area of the wall sign should be masked with an opaque backing. This will allow only the green lettering and shamrock to shine through when the sign is lit. If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please call me. S incerel y , '<-------- Marcia J osep Design Planner cc: Holiday Signs .a;,...-o )--~ '-~ ~~ /\.~ O>~ ~ .,¡ '-!J , -' - ð .. i I '\.. (:(1"d <:;7: (. "k ~ ~ " ."{ ~~ . ,.~. ",",~....,.::Iß!z;- ¡ l t t fr~ . í ~r!J "~ ì t ."U~.w.ttìi·I"·'''''''' .....¡y¡"I'lt-;r.. ".:' . '. a~"-. .}- - t<) -- r ,c.' T T ,^. '-I' It. ,.., '-I ,- I t- I-I ,-. ~ ~ Iv:> ~ ,,\- dl- 7. lJ'l1 't) 'J. - ~~4 ~Ñ\:) J ~~ c::. :t ~ '2~ ;~ Z~ , , { D IlJ .J ç;~ ~( IJJ L ~i ~:I. j~ -....~ J-~ :.J- ..JQ. 4 ('J. ~r'& t~ I \1..> ''::>'''' aìR1- Wcj' ~C\ \DÇ: ....)7. ,YJ :s 7.D Vï:L ~~~ ...x- <t ,C) ~\ I '.j .\= .1. '" ~ :s ~ V\ \jJ c:i. Y' 7. =r. ;- -I ~ a: w :;) ,.) ... II> ;) U uJ l-- J-. N ~ ~ t;~a IIJ ~ w t~-"" ~~~ U¡ I~I.JJ ~ \ 1: ~1D c; u,J ~\ w E ~~~ Iffi '~ I~ . "" f.: f)2: ~ g . t\ :J " L "- r « II ... (; ü: u. C o "'. "" ir o I ~ -< Z « :¡ Ü If. ). '" Z \ 0 ;t-""- ~ ~~ - o ~ :z o ~ .J .... ... 9 T ~ _\ \ ,~ ð f~ ~~ ~ «_ t::. ; Q ~ ~ t- ~ Z º I ~ ... ~ "" z a w ~ 8 ~ 1 ,., 'ë; " '§> :> ..; II> ~ II> r:. u & ~ .. ~ ¡;¡ .~ j a: rð 0 0 ~ ~ i i i ~ ..§ ~ 8 o. :i ~ ::! w II> .... o z >- i o z .{ > ~ Q. ::! o u ~ u. o '>< It: ~ o ~ ~ ä1 iè z :J o ~ ~ d ~ w r .... ~ ª II> W () (11 ï 0- >. .... .., ..... ..... 0 c: ..... ..... >. >. Q) ..... '" I-< .... '0 ..... ..... S ~'Ö ..... 0 ....Q)Q) ..... ..... P. c: .., ..... "'.<:: :> '" I1J 0 .....rn'" c: I-< ..,..,0 ..... ..... ..... "'..... I1J Q) U) I-< .., .., Q) 1-<.<:: U) .., .., Sp. c: c: :> ;j8..... U) X ~op. '" I1J Q) .., '" .0 Q) 01-<'" .., .., '0 V ..... ;j ......... U) rn Q) . I-< U) Q) ..... >. .0 .0 ~ "'~Q) .<:: '" QJ V ;j ;j Q) ..... Q).., U) .., .......... U) U) c: ..c::.,..¡ to ..... '0.0..... I-< I-< V> S c: ,....¡.,..¡ 0 c: 0 c: 0 '0 I-< Q) .., 0 ;jU)p. ..... ..... ..... ..... Q) ",I-< 1-<- '" 0·.... '" '0 I1J '0 UJ .<:: U) ~ > t:: S t:: S t:: 0 Q) t:: 0 .., c: 0> Q) '" Q) I1J P. .<:: 0>..... 0> ..µ 11)..... I-< I-< 0 'µ·..-IO Q) ..... ...-t c: ( ) I-< UJ V t:: Q)- UJ µ¡ 0> 0 '0 '0 '0 '0 P. Q) 0 ..,..... QJ .., t:: Q) c: Q) I-< Q) .., .....0 11JU)'<:: '" .., U) I1J .., UJ UJ 0> Q) Q) ..... .....'" .<:: 8 '0 '" I-< I1J I-< I1J ~'r-i N V UJ I1JN ..,.... Q) UJ t:: 0 UJ c: 0 Q) VI·.... '" ~ 0 .., c: ..... ..... t:: ..... ..... UJ .0 c: UJ ..... Q) µ¡ Q) '0 c: 0> U) S 0 0> UJ S 0 I-< Q) P. .<:: 0.., Q)......., I1J ..... Q) ;j V ..... Q) ;j V Q) Q),<:: Q) .., 0 ~ ;j '0 "'V I-< UJ V ..... UJ V ..... .., S Q) Q) I-< N '" .., 0 -.-I >..... 0> c: ..... .<:: c: ..... .<:: t:: 01-<..... t:: N I>: V 0 I-< 0> I1J ..... UJ 0> '" ..... UJ Q) vp.>. .., 0 0> Q)I-<.., Q) t:: ..... ..... c: ..... ..... U S.., 0 Q) t:: 0 '0 P. U) .0 ..... I-< >. I-< ..... I-< >. I-< ..... au) t:: .., .., ......., p...... .., I1J ..... I1J .., I1J ..... '" 0> ..... V t:: ;j V ø:¡",Q >. UJ > .., 0> UJ > .., 0> c: ..... .... UJ Q) 0 "'..... I>: I1J ..... V ..... V ..... ~ I-< 0 Q) S I>: .....Q) '" '0 >. S X 0 Q) 0 X 0 Q) 0 p. 0 0 Q) p...... c: '" Q) c: I-< t:: Q) c: I-< c: P. UJ.... ~ '0 ..... '0 ..... Q)ttlr-i.. ..... UJ ..... ..... 0 .., Q) Q) t:: UJ '" .<:: I-< UJ '" t:: Q) Q) '0 Q) Q) Q) '0 Q) .<:: U 'Ö-r-i c: '0 '" Q) I-< "'~Q)~ > 0> V I-< c: UJ V I-< t:: UJ U) Q) I-< > 0 t:: ~ UJ '" Q) > 0 0 ..... '" ..... ..... 0 I1J ..... ..... 0 ..... "nn:l QJ.r-t '" Q) op. ...·....OM I-< U) ..... ;j p. ..... ;j p. UJ 001-<.., c: '0 p. N> ..... p. p.Q) b' Q) 0 p.Q) b' Q) 0 UJ I-<ø:¡ '" t::'Ö > 0..... "'Q)I-<O P. 0> Q) S Q) I-< I-< Q) " Q) I-< I-< Q) P. Q) c: t:: o>c: I1J ..... 1-<..... "'1-<0.... I1J t:: I-< '" I-< I1J P. I-< '" I-< I1J P. c: ~ '0..... 0> ..... '" ø:¡ p.", .... '0 ..... UJ UJ UJ ..... Q) Q) ;j S ..... U) U) ~ QI-,...¡ ( ) Q) '0 .., .., .., .., c: .., .., .., .., UJ tf.I....;....- ;::::::I UJ Q) ¡¡ .., ....>1-<'" > c: '" Q) I1J '" '" 0> I1J Q) '" I1J '" ::J Q) > V"'" ~ Q) V I-< t::0> 8 0·.... I-< ..... I1J .<::.<:: .<:: .<:: .<:: ..... .<::.<:: .<:: .<:: .<:: ø:¡ ..c: <l) C;....... UJ Q) ¡¡ ;j '" '" t:: I>: "'OUJ .., .., ..,.., .., .., .., U) ..,.., .., .., .., I .µ ç(·ri·.... ..... c: I1J '0 ¡,., V·.... 0 >. I1J U·.... '" UJ ..... .<:: UJ 0 ..... '0 p., I-< I-< I-< Q) ..... .., .., I1J I-< Q) ,..:¡ .......... ¡.:¡ '" .., Q) >. .., Q) ..... ..... Q) .., .., '" p...... I>: ;j UJ V '" UJ I-< :ã I1J -;;;- :ã :ö ;j Q) U).<:: t:: '" U) p.;j t::..... t:: '0 ..... ¡,., '" V '0 3: V ~ I1J UJ ......., ..... .., 0 "'.0 ¡,., '" c: '" t:: ;j U) p., ¡,., ..,.....1-<.., ..... '" 0 Q) Q) '" S.., '" S V .... I>: .<::.<:: 8 t::'Ot::.<:: '0 Q) 0 p., 8.., U) H"'¡':¡.., '" ., N ø:¡ ., N t:: 0 Ii ..... U .., å. :r: V I-< Q) 0> ~ '0 UJ c: 0 U) Q) I-< ..... (') ..... I1J c: Q) .., ..... 0 .., Q) N .., .., N c: Q Q) t:: I-< ..... I>: ¡¡ .., ;j 0 '" '" p. .., Q) 0 Q) Q) Q) V .<:: ø:¡ .<:: '0 0> I-< ..... .., .., Q) '0 I-< 3: c: 0 '" .... .., Q) ¡.:¡ S Q) ,..:¡ '" .... UJ .., H 0 > .:: I1J ..... ..... :> I-< c: c: Q) .., UJ Q UJ µ¡ I-< .... 0 0 ..... UJ UJ 0 I>: I-< Q) V UJ.., 0 Q) rl P. 0 C:'" c: Q) I-< UJ '" Q) c: '" p. ,..:¡ 0 '" c: V UJ Q) Q) :.: J:; Q) 'rl 0 Ç2 ..... '" ¡¡ , I1J c: I1J .... ;j .., .., I-< ¡,., 'rl I-< rl Q) ~ ....b' '" I1J Q) µ¡ ¡,., ::J c: ·rl t:: p., UJ Q) Q) ,..:¡ '0 ·rl +> 0 0 8 '0 0> ..... I1J I1J .0 0> .., I-< Q) I-< UJ L{) U c: c: 0> .<:: S c: I1J c: 0<: .., 0. 'rl N U) µ¡ O'rl I-< U I-< 0> ·rl UJ UJ U) ..... c: 0 Ö' ¡.:¡ E-< V'Ö ..... I 'rl 'rl I-< .., I1J - U) E-< Q) I-< I1J Q) 8 H Q)..... :> Q) '" '" UJ 'rl Q) ¡¡ Q) µ¡ UJ 0. ~ .., .... ::J ::t: '" U) -.-I "0 V'<:: ¡¡ Q) Q) Q) o I-< Z Q) 0. ::J Z U '" ;j I1J 'rl U 0 Q .<:: " J:; 0 µ¡ .:: I-< '" I1J 0 H I>: '" -ø:¡ 0 Q) :> 1-<>. .., 8 E E-< .:: 0. c: I>: :.: '" ., .... 1>:..... ....µ ,....¡ rl Q) I1J '" >. .... I1J c: Q) ..... - I-< UJ I-< Q) .<:: rn J:; c: I-< H ..... .<:: 0'0 I1J i'-< >< S V Q)..... I-<Q)'ÖQ)J:; P. Q) .., o I1J I>: ¡,., P. c: > 0 E-< .... 0·.... I-< > Q).....c:>v Q) +> ,..:¡ p., Q) Q) Q) 'rl Z N O~·.... U) ...-I 1J}'r-i QI-,.. UJ I1J c: 0 .:: UJ ""rl I>: Q) ::J I>:......,Q) .....U),..:¡ø:¡:.: 0 V '0 0 I>: Q) 0 I1J V '0 0 >. oc:.., ..... Q) .., ..... :>: Q) ·rl I-< p., :> .., V I1J ..... U I-< 0> H+> :.: :<: >..<:: >. '0 D J:; +>:.: p., I-< ·rl ::t: N UJ '" c: >. V 0 .<:: 0..<:: 'Z '" c: eo: UJ V '" 0 I1J .... '" ¡.:¡ ;j .......µ:E:....... Q)~+>......., 0·.... 'rl 0 ·rl I1J I-< U 'rl 'rl I1J L{) .<: ,..:¡ I-< ..,t:: I-< c: t:: 000 HV D ..... Q) ¡,., V ..,,..:¡ L{) .., I>: .0 Q);j"'" "''''E'OS E-< I-< Q) 01 .0 '0 0. 0 I-< I-< ..... I-< ~ Q) Q)OO..c: ...... ~·rl ::::I'rot 0<:'" E eo: '" Q) N '" Q)N ..... I1J 0 ¡,., ::':U.,.U Q¡"'81>:E-< E-<~ I1J ¡.; ,0; +> I-< UJ µ¡ 0 ~ UO Q)'rl c: ¡.:¡ Z c: Q UJ I-< I1J ¡... I , V V ø:¡ ¡.; eo: :.: Q) Q) '" II) 11JL{) I-< I-< Q) ,..:¡ tI) tI) '" 0 tI) ....'0 U 0\ '" '" Q) J:; '" eo: ¡.; H UJ Q) Q) H I Z I-< I p.,E +> ¡.; eo: I-< 0 H '" '0 > ¡,., Z 0 o~ Z E ø:¡ ø. Q) E-< Ø1 ~ ·rl H U) ....z 0 coo t:: :>: ¡.; .., ,0; '01-< E-< '-' ¡>; t.'J H ....U 0 Z ¡.; p; .... H E-< E I-< I-< ¡>; H WOO "'H 8 Z 0 :0: It! H tI) ;j '" '" µ¡ tI) p., UJ UJU) P; p.>. 0'0 H >t ,0; ¡.; I-< 0 U ~ Q)~ H '" '" HQ) E-< Q E-< '" U 0 ø:¡ Q) ¡,., ¡,., 0 ;j¡'" ¡>; :.:~ 8.., ¡.; ,0; ~ Z ;j I-< I ¡,.,..... b" U J:; "'''' E-< U D .:: b' Q) 0 Ø1 "'..... Q)ø:¡ U) X 0> UV ,0; 0 0 0 :::. H '<:0 :> ~ 80 1>:1>: µ¡ ""rl 00 Q H ø:¡ U H H '" E-<~ H U).... = '" Q 8::t: ,..:¡,..:¡ 'tÍ .... ui III I: I-< .... 0 ;J 'C Q) '<::Q) 0 0 '" .¡.JI: .¡.J ::;: Q)'<:: .¡.J..... Q) > .... .¡.J ..... 0' III I:~.¡.J ..... I: Q) .<:: .¡.J>. '" 0 III õ¡..... '" Q) 'C ) III ) Q) ~ Q) III .¡.J Q) - 0. .... Q) I-< III ) õ¡ I: 0"''<:: Q) 'C '<::rl '<::1:0 Q) 0 .<:: QJ ..... '" .<:: .¡.J '<::tQ 0' .¡.JQ) 'C .¡.JIIIU I: .¡.J I: UJ o.Q).¡.J.¡.J III Q)..... UJ~III ..... Q) Q) ..... '" '" '<::0. III- =<:) <'" III ....0' 'C '<::OQ) U III O'.¡.J õ¡ .¡.J III ) 01: I: .¡.J'Crl Q) ..... ..... I-< ''C I: Q)- III '" >. . Q) rl ..... Q) ..... ..Q ~ .... o I-< Q) -..-t ¡::..µ ~ QJ ;; .<:: . rl tQ.<::.¡.J rl .¡.J.<:: ~ ) Q) '" 0 ..... QJ.... 0 III ....; 'CO.¡.JIII I-< )0. ~.¡.J", '" o..¡.J .¡.JQ) 0. .¡.J I-< ..... 0 rl '" '" 0' QJ I: '" õ¡ < .<:: ) Q) 0 0 0·.... 0' III I-< Q))I-<o. ..... ..... I: ) 0 ..... I: rl 0 Q).¡.J U I: U 'C'<::I: QJ '<::Q)QJO ;J 0 I: I-< > >. U Q) I-< '" I: Q) ) '" Q)- U ..µ.......µ !r-4 I: ..Q..... '" Q) 0. Q) rl'C '<::O'C 0111 I-< 0 .<:: III >Xo. 0 .¡.J I-< I-< "'rlO .¡.J....I: .¡.J U '" .¡.JQ)U > Q) I: ,<::Q)QJ Q)",'CQJ I: O.¡.J Q) '" 0 ) >. .<:: ..... '<::0 U I-< I-< .¡.J .<:: õ¡ 1:.<:: ..... 0 QJ..Q I: Q) rl 'C.¡.JQJ .¡.J .¡.J..... ..... Q) 0 I-< .¡.JI-<"'.¡.J .¡.J I-< QJ Q) I-< '<::Q) III '" .<:: '" .¡.J '<::I-<'<::rl 0 0 >. ::;:.<::> OQ)", <::- .¡.J I-< ;J .<::.¡.J.¡.J .¡.J Q) '" )0...0 0. ....... 'C 'C ...'" .... õ¡N QJ 0 '" <:: ;J'C 'tÍ .... U QJ '" <:: ~ >. '" Q) III .<:: QJ 0 0' 111'<:: ..... I: .<:: 0' Q) III <:: .... 0 I-< ..c:.,- H...-i QJ 0><: '" I-< ..QUI: ..... "'.¡.J > O.¡.J <:: UJ UJ QJ QJ o 0'''' QJ ... 00><: I-< UJ QJ>. 0 UJ ) Q) ..... ..... QJ ..... õ¡ > <:: .<:: .... 'C)U rl '" UJ'CQ),<:: QJ UJ Q) I-< .¡.JO> I-< õ¡ 0 ....... (f "µ .... UJ QJ ..... '" QJI:.<::.¡.J õ¡ '" - 'C QJ U 0. '" UJ 0 0. o 0 I-< QJ 'C QJ '" QJ > Q) ;J 0' ...... ::s .µ ..... 0.<:: UJ '" ;J <:: 'C õ¡ QJ "'U 0. ::St"""i tyI~ ... U·,.....¡..c: t1' UJ <:: 0. ) U QJ 0 UJ·.... 'C <:: 'C QJ I-< QJ 0. tI)...-i C 0 UJ <::QJ.¡.J '" ..... OQ).... ... Q) I-< UJ UJ '" Q) <:: I-< <:: I-< '" UJ ;J '" '" U QJ ) QJ U ........ 'C 'C"''C ..... .<:: õ¡ ;J >. 0 .......Q.<:: QJ 0 ... QJ QJ I-< ..Q '" '" QJ rl'<::l-< '" <:: õ¡ 0 <:: <:: ..... UJ Url <:: UJI-<...O 0><: Q) I-< -... ;J... '" >.0' .... o I-< QJ '" .¡.J- 0 ... QJ 0. E QJ õ¡ I-< QJ rlQJ<::<:: 0 :<: UJ rl·... .... U 0''<:: 0. 0.... X õ¡ QJ õ¡ UJ ;J'Crl 0 I-< ..Q 0. 0' 0 ) Q) '" <:: UJ '" Q)~.¡.J õ¡ õ¡.... CO) QJ '" õ¡ '" '" U '" o.Q) ) QJ '" 0·.... I-< <:: Q) ) 0 .¡.J I-< U 0 '" <:: UJ 0 UJ ) 1-<.<:: E rl ) QJ UJ.... >'0'<:: rl UJ "''C U "'... UJ ..... 0'" I-< UJ O'.¡.J <:: Q) .¡.J .¡.J Q)rl Q)..Q <:: UJ >. QJ Q) '" Q) UtQU.¡.JQJ ..... >. I: '" ) 0 .<::>. '" '<::"'rl .¡.J .<:: '" <:: Q) Ii rl '<::'<::UJ I-< ~ ......<:: .<:: QJ "'.<:: QJ U .....rl<:: .<:: .¡.J)'" '" .¡.JQ) 0' 'C <:: UJ ......QJ'C QJ QJ<Orl.¡.J ... .<:: .<::.¡.J<:: <:: QJ ..... ;J .<:: ;J ..... '" 0 0 ;J 0'" .<:: .<:: ... QJ ..... U UJ .....OQ) .¡.JQ)UJ ..... .¡.J tJ'.¡.J UJ õ¡ I-< 0 .¡.J'<::'C'<:: ... ... QJ "'0' .... UJ '" - '" ..Q .¡.J "''<:: ;J "''''.<:: 'C ... õ¡ ",.¡.J '<::UJ 0 ..... UJ .¡.J -0' <: .<:: Q) ;J .<::.¡.J<:: 'C .<:: 0. 0' UJ- >'Q) UJ ..... .<::........ <: >. 'C.¡.J;J'C.¡.J '" '" 'C<:I-<<:: .¡.J.<::UJ 0 ..... ;J Q) ..µ O-..-t rl UJ 'C <: .¡.J)",<:: .<:: QJ o I-< 'C) .<:: Q)..... 0 >. .¡.J '" <: ..... <:: 0' I-< '" <:: '" .<::>. ) <: 1-<..... ",.¡.J QJ ) .¡.J'C....rl 'C .<:: 'C 'COUJ "''C 'C <: <: QJ..Q ..... <:: 'CO.¡.Jrl ..... QJ X ) I-< :.:... ;Jrl '" Q).¡.J Q) Q) '" .¡.J <:: Q)",.¡.J .... > H ;J Q)'C '" 'C "''''<:1-<0 UJ·.... 'C .¡.J.... I: .¡.J"'>. .¡.J .¡.J >.) UJ ;J ... '" õ¡ QJ UJ ..... ... Q) rl.... "'0 0. '" Q) ....-t ::s..... ,.; "'.<:: 0. <:: "'0. 0 '" 0' õ¡ II1UJ ,.; UJ n:I O·..-i 0><: 0.'" .... QJ 'C :.: .......Q .¡.J.¡.JO ..... ...O.¡.J õ¡ I-< .¡.J<::.<:: ;J QJ '" ....¡.J õ¡1-< UJ X UJ I-< õ¡ QJ UJ UJ QJ::;: UJ U 0 UJ U '" o 0' UJ·.... 0' U ~ .<:: ::;: ) UJ 1-<::;: '" QJ'<:: '" Q) 0·.... '" <:: 0' õ¡ .¡.J 0. .<:: 1-<:': U ;J I-< QJ UJ QJ 0'».... I-<rl O<:O.¡.J .<::;JQ) '<::Q).¡.J .¡.J U '<::"'0 .¡.JO' :':.¡.J <: .<:: '" o..¡.J I-< '<::;J 0.... .¡.Jo. I-< U·... U '" o.Orl <: o.rl UJ '" 0..... I-< 1-<..... '" 0 0..<:: '" Q) o.O<:: õ¡'" UJ Q) QJ .¡.J .<:: QJ ..Q <:: QJ..Q I: 'C..Q Q) 0.'<:: Q) UJ ..... Q ..... Q) 0''<:: .... QJ I-< <:: .¡.J 'CI-< rl UJ III >'.¡.J UJ 'C '" >. 111"'0' <:: UJ .¡.J ..Q .. I-< r.¡ .¡.J UJ - <: .¡.J .... UJ'<:: >. 0 UJ <: rl (Ij...-t QJ o Q) Q) .... o Q)...-t ..... Q) 0 o Q) Zo. Q 0 o .¡.J..... ..... O.¡.J.....¡.J ......<:: ..... ) X.<:: III ,.., .¡.J 0' '" ,.., 0' UJ ...:!;J ,..,I-<QJ ~.<:: 00 Z E ,..,I-<'C'C ::;: ,.., '" '" Ho. ::;: Q).¡.J QJ I: I: I: tJ' 0<:: .¡.J HI-< 0 o rl QJ Q) Q) Q) tQ .... ...... '" ,.; . '" Q) . '" -..-1...-1 80. (.J QJ . o......¡.J . õ¡ . 'C .¡.J ·UJ ui ~~~~ UJO'<:: UJ'<::'<:: 1-<0. UJO'<:: 1-<.... 00. r.¡ .<:: UJ Q) ;J 0 UJ UJ '" I-< '" Q) I-< 0 :.: 0. U :.: :':U.¡.J :.: 0 :':UIII :':0 :0: '" <1.1 8 :':1-<..0<: :.: :':U::;: õ¡O' ::;:,.., :.: ) QJ ..... > QJ I-< I-< ..... QJ .<:: ... I-< o .... 'C I-< '" o ..0 QJ .<:: .¡.J Q) I-< o .... QJ ..Q UJ ..... .<:: .¡.J .¡.J .<:: 0' ;J o I-< ..Q UJ '" .<:: .... .... '" ... UJ ....Q) Orl I-< ..Q o I-< Q),<:: '" ....Q) .<::U) 'C 8"'0 I-< <:: QJ.... 0::> .... rl . ~ ro o >. 0 U 0..... Q) <:00 .<:: Q)Q).¡.JUQ)8 .<:: QJ N 8 I-< 'C Q)..... 0' QJ .... UJ . UJ..Q '" . UJ 0 '" Q) UJ UJ·... o.QJ.<:: <:: OO'8\D O''C I-< <:: CO) ..... W 0. ttI [ } U1 ..c::.\f-4 O"'U:':O .¡.J 0. Q) U Q)01-<1-<"'.... <::1-<"'0....'" .... 0. ......Q.¡.J ..0 <: 0 "'0><: '" UJ UJ.¡.J . U U )..... '" o UJ 0 '" UJ Q) ~.r-t...-i :>, ... õ¡ rl 0. UJ co ...-t (t c:: ra 0·.... m .<::.<:: 0' U ) UJ·....... UJ UJ (J) n:I W·,... ·.... QJQ) .<::.....<:: I-<.<::QJ.¡.J..Q.¡.J... ",.¡.J.<:: '" U ... 'C Q) '" ..... 'C'C I-< O'UJ I-< QJ <:: <:: '" <:: ..... (J)n:JCOtOcoUJ o ..Q.c: r-t..... 0.0'0' U 'C o <:: <::;J UJ ~.......-t C Q) QI U] 0.1-< I-< QJ'<:: 1-<..... Q)QJ õ¡.¡.J;J'<:: UJ........ UJ.¡.J <:.¡.J.¡.J", 1-<'" O'Q)Q) OQJ<: .....,.... ...-i Q)~ S·.... UJ .¡.J 'C'C"'O'UJ'" .... Q) QJ 'C I: <:: QJ ....XXO·....O'I-< "'.......... õ¡ 1-<..... '" )........ õ¡QJUJ O.¡.J I: QJ QJ QJ U..... QJ 0' .<::.<::.<:: U QJ .<::..... 8....¡.J"'rl.....UJ .Q) ;J .¡.J UJ s:: ..... ra QJ[/] ,...; ...-iQJ õ¡ k QJ I-< O'>'<::kQ)U Q)..... '" k '" I-< <:: .c tI} r-I It! (Ij ..... .¡.J 1-<'<::'<:: I-< QJ U.¡.J >. 0 .... Q) > ..... QJ.¡.J O'<::OQJ)'<:: .¡.J I-< .¡.J QJ kOI-<"''C > o 0 QJ Q) I-< ·.....<::'C'C:.:UQJ .¡.J .¡.J..... QJ UJ k UJ . .......... I-< > '" 0 I-< 'C)I-<O Õ¡ rlO 'C 0 I-< UJrl'C '" Q) U 0.<:: 1-<......... .... 0. QJ QJ ) I-< QJ..QQ)",QJ.¡.J I-< .<::..... U ..Q.¡.J." 0 ....¡.Jk<:: QJQJU "''''QJQJ....> .<:: 0.1-< QJ > 0 QJ .¡.J õ¡.......Q "'''''1-<.<:: .... 0 <:: .<:: QJ o..¡.J )Uµ.jQJ <::0. >.¡.Jk"'k C"µ Q) to ro I'C -.- O'O'<::'<::'<::'<::UJ'<:: ..... c..µ ..µ U rei .µ U) ..µ ...... UJ k '" UJ Q) UJ ) ri·..-t·......c::c'Oc .... .<::... 0' 0' I-< reI:>'.. .J ..-t 0·.... Q) ) 0...... UJ UJ.¡.J UJ'" O)k .¡.J QJ U 0'.... I-< .... ;J ..c:: "Cor-t Q) ro,....¡,...; .¡.J QJ QJ UJ k QJ "'.U .... > '" 0.) .......Q 0.... 0. 0. .... ~ttI~,....¡ n3WIU o QJ 0. '" I-< '<::;J 0.0'0.) 0 0... UJ 0. k '" .......... ;J"'.¡.J ....> UJ'<:: <: UJ III 0' 0 UQJO<::I: .... .¡.J QJ ::;: 0'..... k 0 o QJ..Q .....:.: 0 <::.<:: UJ U·......... k 8 QJ "'..... <:: '" >.¡.J 'C..Q..... ;J U "'UQJ 'Co ..<::..... I-< QJ." õ¡ ....'C I-<QJ;J"'", .... I-<.¡.J.¡.J.¡.J tJ' "'''''''UJ.....'''QJQJ ... 0 .<::..... QJ 0.'<::'<:: UJ..Q.¡.JC....08... 0' <:: .... ) o .... .... o .... QJ .<:: .¡.J UJ .¡.J UJ QJ 0' 0' ;J UJ .... .... '" .¡.J UJ QJ .<:: .¡.J k o '" QJ I-< '" >. 0. o U QJ rl ..Q '" QJ 0' <:: '" .<:: U QJ .<:: ... QJ > Ok õ¡0' QJ..... I-< UJ "'rl <::.... '" '" U ) .... rl'C o.QJ o.UJ '" 0 0. QJ 0 .<:: I-< E-oo. 0' <:: <:: "'..... I-< .<:: QJ .¡.J .¡.J = ......¡.J )QJ.¡.J ......... ." rl QJ <:: :.: Q) UJ U) (1.1...... '" I-< õ¡ 0' k 0' QJ QJ..... ..Q'<::UJ .¡.J ." QJ .... >..<:: ;J....... 0<:: '<::Ok UJ QJ ).<:: k 0 ) 0'.... o,... r-I...c: UJ"'O' ;J rlrlO rlrll-< "'..... .<:: )).¡.J QJ UJ QJ .<::..... k .¡.J.<::..... E-o.<:: .... UJ o . 0 '" 0'''' QJ <:: ...¡ -..-t ;< "':': U U 0 QJ '" I-< .¡.J..Q õ¡ ..... '" '<::QJ'<:: ) ;J UJ C' QJ",'C .<:: 0.<::. E-oO'" .... N I-< rl 0 rl .... .¡.J '" UJ ) UJ I-< QJ ..... QJ I-< .... '<::;J ...... 'C U Q) Q) .µ ..... UJ'<::;J 0. UJ.....Q ;J 'C U... .. QJ (/} It! >,.µ ...... .c...-i C 'C.¡.JQJQJ > UJ Q) 'µ'rl Q) ..Q;j...1-< 0"'0. ." I-< ......-i'O'µQ) ::SWU)..c: o 'µ'.-I (f) ) <:: <:: ............ QJ 0 E ;j 0.." 111 UJ '" ¡>; UJ QJ <>: ".-t ..c: '0 UJ QJ QJ k >.<:: 0' 0... "rl . H UJ ... 0. >. -rl Q....Q QJ E '" .<:: I-< 'C .¡.J QJ QJ QJ 0...0 ) ..... QJ co tJ'I C-,-i .<::<::"'> 'µ'..-i U ill 'C 1-<) 'OriC Q) Q)..... tJ'IQ)-,-; ... ;J.......Q > "'..0 UJ QJ ... 01-< UJ QJ 0'''' .<:: <:: UJ .c .µ...-t rn ... 0. 'C'C'C QJ <:: <:: QJ I-< U) Q) ro QJ ro 0.<::...<::0 ""...UJ ..0 QJ <:: . 'Ö W ty\ Q) UJ C ...¡.......c: ::;:"'....UJ... <:: QJ 0' QJ .<:: <:: <:: ." QJ ... Q) 0 0·.... UJ QJ..Q.<:: "'UJ '" ... I-< <::.¡.J 0. ......<:: <:: 'C 0·.... ;j QJ >.... QJ Q)"'.... .¡.J '<::'C'C"'I-<'<:: UJ'<:: .¡.J<::UJ",rlQJkQ).¡.J) QJ QJ UJ·... 0' ;J.¡.J;J > 0 I-<QJO'O",<::QJOkO'C.¡.Jk 0.'<:: '" rl 0......:.: ) QJ U '" UJ <:: 'C..... UJ k QJ -... O'O'Orlrl QJ Q) QJ )..... 0' U] ro·.... c .µ...... ..c: ...¡..c: 0 t'CI ro UJ .<:: UJ·.... ;j ... 0.... 'C 0' <:: QJ... ...."..Q"''C k"'O' C C+JW ..c:wQJC·....-,....¡ ..... ........ QJ UJ 'C ) ... :<:..... ) 0' UJ ... UJ;j O'OkQJ'" <:: '" ;J 0 QJ o.;J E... UJ Q)..... UJ'<:: ..0 0'." 0 0 0 UJ . QJ > k·.... ... ." <:: k I-< I-< UJ ." UJ "'.....<:: 'CQJ",,,,o.O' QJI-<UJ'<::'" k <:: ... .<:: :.: -:<: '" QJ rl.¡.J '" "'<::UUJQJUk 0<::00."'.<:: ·rl 'O::r:: rtJ Q) ,.Q "ri .µ .E: ..c: .µ >'OQJ"'..QQJ UJ 0'" .¡.J 0..<:: 0 1-<." ;j ;J'" U QJ I-< ...1-< . QJO'", <::..00 0'> QJQJ >..c DID s::.µ¡::..... 0.:<:." QJ I-<.¡.J UJ I-< õ¡ UJ 0·....... o QJ'<::;j 0' ;j'Ö<::>.U I-< .".....Q.<::<::QJ"'OQJ "'''' Q.. . W H Ü t'CI..c: ...-{ H U) U) ...¡ )QJ<::QJ....<::...<::I-<I-<'" ... QJ QJ k·....... '" I-< '" '" QJ ).¡.J... .<::..... <:: E QJ E.<:: >.... UJ '" "'>'ÖQJ", >0... QJQJ;j QJCtJ1U'OO ",¡ ~ ...¡..c:·nQJ ~ ...¡rc¡:: ,....¡ ~>'OQ. ...¡ o '" I-< ;J ... 0. 'Ö UJ 0 UJUJ'<::QJO<::>'OQJQJQJ"' õ¡ I-< - I-< U'" ) QJ... U 0':<: <::) Q.) '0 (I'J VI U) ..... ro ..... ..c: C "'¡QJQ)¡::..c:WrlWC ttI.¡.JU ~ I"CI >,..c: -..-I U H -r-i M Q"\ .,....¡ ::s ::s o 0 ... õ¡..... 0...0..0.... õ¡ 0...0 õ¡ ..0 LO .¡.J .<:: ..... '" UJ QJ X NOUJ)Q)UJQJ rlQJ_QJ <:: QJ ... QJ .<::..... 0' 0'..0 UJ ..Q <::.<:: I-< ~ -... > <:: <:: 0 QJ QJ >'+JOQ) Q) ro-riJ...¡::r::U)rl ,...; ~::SI.&-l'µ'd ...¡..c:~P., u),- ~ ...¡ '0 Q.r-t C 0 U 0 Q)-..-t o UJ .<:: "'.... .<:: UJ . <:: ) <:: .... UJ >. 'Ö ) Q) UJ·.... III ..... QJ QJ .¡.J <:: - '" UJ .<:: I-< UJ 'C >UJ<::·....;jO'rlUJ;JUJ Q);Jk ...¡ Q)........... 0 s:: rl 0 Q) C C .a (Ij o H ~.~ H·~·~ H ~ H.~ ~ U ;J ;j..Q 0'.".<:: QJ QJ ;J '" '" I-< 'µ,.Q.,..¡~........ 'C..c:'µrl..oW¡:: . U tn u·,..¡ Q.I ¡:: .µ 0 Q. ..c: Q) H·~ ¡::.,..¡ ro ~~ 0 (Ij.~ X~'µ Q) ::;: 0...... >..Q..Q... p. I-< 0. QJ 0 0..0 QJ .<:: .¡.J QJ U k .... UJ 'Ö QJ > o I-< 0. 0. '" '0 '" .<:: UJ .¡.J <:: QJ E õ¡ o U I-< o .... .... 'I-< '" ... UJ I-< o 111 ¡>; <>: Q) .<:: ... .... ..... 'C QJ :.: UJ '" I-< QJ rl rl ..... ::;: ." QJ :.: UJ '" õ¡ o I-< ..... UJ ." <:: ..... ...:! UJ ::;: I-< ::;: 01 .c ... I 1 .. ..... " '" "" I': o Q) 0" B ... .. ... ... 01 I': 01"'1 (1:1..... ~J4~ ...... ... ",.cO ;~ ~ 01 01 œ ~ 1-4 U ¡¡,.... 01 å ·~§13.~ bQut:"E .E...... g 0 ~ ~ ~.~ .......c: ø...c: "", ... Q) ( J ~ >. r-t c:: CIS.a ~.~ ~] 'H ... 0.... ... .¡.J............ .f"i < " e :; ~ Q) 0. . C'd ø. ~~§~ ~.~ Q) ~ .. .a" ~ ~ ~ ~ I': .. " ~O~+.I 0'" 0 ...-1 .µ c:; .µ ~ ..... .. I': '" ...... cd '"tJ 01"'1 &.",å... "I': .. ....Ofll..c: .... c:; .µ 01 ... 0 U) CO'I"'I c: <UU+JOi) ¡":;;:: ~.~ 'H o » ... .... ... o .c ... " .. "" I': .... I': o to " .c ... ... " '" § '" " ... 0. o '" .. .~ 01 U I': .. .~ '" ... o "" p., o <.) '" I': .~ '" . '" ... .~ § ¡":,3 ~ VI ~ ~ "" ~ ~ H j H ~ <.) a .t::+J.¡.J1 () 0 U ns .......... (1,)...... ~ ...:::: &, OJ .. " ....c ... ~b~.µ »>-='C: å å ~ Ë BI':.cG>' o 0 u r"""i ). '1"'1 Q) 0. ~~-§~~ bO~ rl .~ Po c:: ..~ ~'~.~~1! cr µ c( en ~ OJ .. ... ... U I': ~ 8..~ .~ ~ 0 n1 ~ fà~ >.~t .a I': å .... .~ ~ .~ 4-4 ß·E ~~O+.l~ :a~Q)8< ~g.~t..t§ .~~uo~ 1-4 .µ Q) c:: ..... .µ ..c: 0 > ~t'µ"j< ~ ~ .5 ~~ ~ ..... 1-4 gfG"C~~ ,,~ål':~ .a" " .....~~~~ r;;~.~>..µ ~~~a;~ ~~~E~ Q) =' > 0 ¡5~~~:D ": ~ ~ ~ . ... '" 0 '" 01 . I': " .... u ~ @ .a... '" ....: 01 '" " I': '" .... .... ... ... ... 01 " "" > I': '" 0 ...... ~ g '" "'... " .... .... > 'H .... .... ... ...u'" @ .. § '" ... 0 'r-! 0 I. - '" :z: o H .... H :z: H .... "" '" .c"''' u u .a ..-I.g c: .c 0 .. :> ... u 0. I': ... 00 . " .~ ~ ~ ~ 0 <0.... .. . 00 i::~. .§~ ..-1 > 0 U) ... I': " '" ",.c " u ç: .. '" O....c '" 0 :> I': '" .. '" ... .a " 0 <~'H VI ~ ~ .. 'Û k .. I I :>-a Q) 0 en ... c: ns>. -dQ)O ..... cu c: 0 .µ u ø....... 0 0 c:: .~ ~'j bOa) ~ "'I:j ..... c: >. .. "d~c::tII'"tJ bò~~n3~(j .E"'I:jC1l's'E(I) ~ cu'£i Q) ..-t+.l uOO,&J C'O tn ): ,.-I .c ø. 8. C'd r-i .. g,o .. tII~1~2 Q)..... 0 c:: ~..c:'µQ)':;;'; t.~~.z.Ë~ '8.3(1)4-4...6 +JOrl° oÕ~'~ ~~ c:: ..-4 c: .µ 0 :0 ~ 01"'1 ~ (I .. c:"t;]oø.~~ '~~.µg.o..::1 ø.~~ V) 1-4~ ..... "d "" 0 I. - oô.~@o...." .E VI ~ ell ~ ~ ~ ;....1"'1 : H S hi 0 UI c: .. ;J ~'I"'I 8 ~~ >...-4'.~ ~ hi ~ ~lIIrop.~~ oÕt'4I8;1 ..1':....c0'~ +J'M Q)+J @~g. ;~ ~~~~.~o III .,-i '0 .µ :Dâ";;;(jå@"; ~~~tI1-52~ > .a ¡... .,-1 U "06CO<lJt'O::J < Q,lQ.µS+J'"Q ~ ~~ ~.~~~ BooII) a .&-JCUI·.-irou ·.-i.¡.JO ~ o.¡.J ~ II) tI1 ~ U 0',-4 Po rø ... ~ c Co'] r( +J ~ e t: -g t: .~ ] .;: ~ +J~a...~~~ 'ri.~- ] U QJ ~ 0 Q) .~ -5 g.~ ~ ::tbO'¡¡g.µ"O~~ o~ II) C "0 QJ c:: U Q .¡.J I .-I·a OOQtdQ),....-t.c 0\ ~ 0 ~ ¡"').4 0.. o.¡.J J..I '"0 f1SN'MP'c1J+JC/ 1-40Q) .c ~>-.-5@QJ~~'~"O UlrdH..o<n::l.cO.l""io.~ ~'H~"O:aS~u~c:~ to~å"'''å2'''0~ ~ Q) III 0 tI "CJ,....( j . ~utt§g~~'";i~@ u~o.g'''''Q.I§::I.c§r-4 .-If/)g.~~~·.-iQ,ltl mp.. r( U') k o.'M OQ~.a 1-1 0'" ·~·.-IIJI "~I-4~O~~§ +Jo_ ltI'Hoo.'µc:~~ ~+J "¡~o °Ul'~ 0 "'d Q) VI "tl,....( a c "d.-l C .µ ~ Q.I II) 'M ~ tI1 Q) @ ~ '.-i@'.-Ig'ci(j~'~ ell ~"O~¡"'>(/ Ord>''µ"O ~Q)o..~ c'5'µ§@~ ~ OJ .. ..; ¡... Q ~..-I o ¡... "d U) ] ·rl Q) 8. 3 0 IJI p..~~.µ&]"O. Va) ~ 'H..-4U..-i::lCQJ .c co ~ ~ -5 2t.-l Q) CT,1 ~ ~.µ BI-I~m~I-4'~~ ~§ U Q) U 000 o~ ~-gI-lC'5ai"O§ ~.~t13 ro cd ~-g ~ ~§j B@Q,lê~~ra.µ~.-I~ ~ g.~B ~@~~c ~~~ ê ~~1J:a~.~ -5§~~Q):t;5.~ ]~ RJO,-iP..cCE!1-4H::I'rl µ:¡uuo.µrø·"'¡.¡...Iou¡e ~ ~ '" .... ..: o Po< ¡:j ~ H .., ffi ß H .... H .... gj u ~ ~ ~ ~ 1-1"0 n; OJ 0" .a .c"" u I': '" .z~:aClj OM +J en a ): cG.... I': .., .. J..I ~ @ ";;; 0'H ffi .,-i c'H U' ~8.o~ .µ ::I VI 1-4 ~-g~~ "O~&-g '~B ~ c .,-1,.-4 0.. rø .~ fJ QJ ffi . -ß -5 tI) § H ~ " 0 :> ~] ~ ~ ... '" 0 "0 :::: p.. '.-1 >. ...¡ ;:I 01)" .. .~ ó..~ t '" ... 0 >.;; 0. 2: ;¿....;~ I': ... QJ 0 ~ aJ ~ .g 0 ...¡ V1 +J . B'~g~~ U ...¡ (I; :>. e ~ ~.o ~ ~~~~~ 0. .... '" 0 '" ¡:: c: ...¡ "0 .~IÚP.§~ '1""1 .µ ..... 0 .µ ;:I ro ~ "'d H 0 QJ 00 QJ QJ..cH~.¡..J ;:'.¡..J U VI ~.,-{ 0 (I; 0 « :J; .µ .a p.. .01 -ß ... .. ãJ 1 01 ... 01 .~ '" ... o '" .... o N '" , co 1 .... '" .. ... 0. o '" .. 01 .~ '" ... o ffi ~ H ~"":' ~.~ ... '" 8 ~ '" '" ~ "" '" o p., [3 p., ~ ..; VI ~ ~ OOtn~4-4Q)C:fJlOOC: .~;! § 0 ~.,-{..-I.~ 0 ~ "fJlg~g.~tßO }..¡ J,.I QJ.... '.-('1""1 ro.... ~~.~~""'~.ct~ o c.µ }..¡"O.µ.~.µ QJ ~~'H~~&.3~~ .... 0 0 (I; fJI 0 fJI ...¡ "'¡>@+J ~ ~O~~}..¡ ...¡nI~.~ ¡::~~'"d~'µ~8..+J V1~~C1I'.-I~Q)~@ .... -. H'8 ~~.~ p..~ -5~~ ~"O~,g.ê e :8--+JH~~Q)~~ :s >.~tn~......c 0 QJ~.a~~g.µ~~ ""j'~~p..:a ...¡~~~ ~~:ri"'" 0 .~~ ~ 0 ID .~ ~ ~ ~ u 0 -cV)~nI~.~~~ b,~~~~~·~-g.¡..J b ~ .~ ~ ~ c: ~ p.. >. ep.-c .¡..JoUQJC ...¡ ..... nI.c nI ~oj.:7~.ct 0(1+-1 V1 ~ ...¡""'+J~QJCC(l! . ~ 2 0 ~ ~.~ .,..¡ -g ~ OJ...¡ c:.....-c....-irl ;V .c .µ 0 c: ..-1 t ~ g .~ ......-i .U J...¡ QJ 0 "d QJ ...¡'.-I.c .~.8 o.~ J...¡~~ ~U') ~ ..c;J 0lJ 0 oj (I; ..-1 ~ ...¡.:7~ >§.~~13 o~( J;;ojc:-c "d .5 ë'~ '5 ~ ~ » @ ~ ~ VlO ...¡ ..-Ic:rl ou ';j ~ ~ ,; ~ U} .~ -ô ~ ~ "'¡'.-I ri>(J)'"OQ, C..¡..J QJ "d c: aJ .¡..J ~ co 1'(\ > c: QJ co aJ (I; QJ ...¡ .¡..J '1JOQJ.c,.c......-i.coj.¡..J ...¡ « u..a ;J .¡..J 0...¡..J p.. (I; 0 ,''''' ~ ~ ~ <0. .c o."'f-< .. å ~ @ ~ .. µ '" ... 0 ~5.e-~ 0(1 p.. ;j rl '1""1 OJ p.. ~ "'" 00 ...'" .µ (I; Q) 0lJ .. "''' .c ~ C ..-1 .µ QJ aJ :J; .c ... 0 Q)'µ C....-I ...¡ .,-i...... " .c 0 tf] U ..¡ ~ ¡:: ..-1..-1 (l) .c (l) QJ :>.c.c o .., µ +J ~ ...¡ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ VI ;:I QJ ~ C ...¡ ~ 0 o 0 ..-1 U ·rl V1 U +J .. VI ra .. 00 " ...... c: U 0 ;:I '1""1 ;.:: .µ ""'" " ".-. '" "'¡·rl.¡..J QJ " 0'" QJ..c c: c: '" " cu ....µ.µ ,..c:"'Ccuc: .., å ;>,.... ~: ; ~ .c > QJ +I ·rl V) '" ... I': o 0 U 0 P...¡..J QJ 'rl ... 'H.., ;j aJ~ ('( P..¡.JQJ...... .. " QJ .,-i aJ bO ¡": ¡;, ~ ~ 'H o 001': I': 0 ·rl·..-I .., µ .. .. ~ u " .... 00'H Q) .... ... .., I': "'OJ .0'" .... " ... Q) ...c 'Hµ rl Q) ... :> 0 'H '" I': '" .. ... .. ;>,U} .., '" Q) Q) 'H U .. .. '" " . .., .c 0 .., " rl .. " Q) ... .c .. ....... .. .. ....c OJ ... I': OJ '" " "" I': 0 00 .... QJ...-I.¡.J .c U} .. .., u 000 " I': ~ ... .... 0.., '" au", o .. " ... ... I': o...¡.J ...-1 '" '" 0·..-1 ::I ....-0.0 , .. '" µ OJ 'H .. U} " u " .. I': Q) .., I': .... .. a " .~ ... .. Q) ... '" u ;>, .. " ~ .c.c .., 00 .... .~ .c '" .., " I': .. " E ~ '" Q) " " :> ... I': ... .... '" u '" .... µ rl .... .0 "'H <0.0 Q) " '5 ~ ... ... u .. OJ Q) ... 0. o P- ... .. 0. '" o " .... <II , '" " <II I': o .... .., .. ... " .., .. U} 00 .~ ~ o > .. ;>, .0 '" .., Q) 'H .. '" ... .. ~ " I': .~ .~ .c '" Q) .... :> :> "''H å 0 '" .~ 3 "''H ... U} " OJ.c -0.., " 0.1': .... " > I': o 0 ... .... 0.'" a " .... 'H I': o 0 ';< u .. I': .... .c ... .... :> '" '" " I': .... '" " .a u .... 'H .... U " 0. '" '" I': .. "" .~ ;>, 'H .... .., I': Q) '" .... I': " 00" .....-. '" 0. B < 8 '" ..~q '" ~ .0 ... 1 0·... .cµ U~ I': " < a '" .., " Q) .E '" .... .-. .a .. .., '" Q) ... .... Q) .c µ ;>, 'H .... .., I': " '" .... '" I': .. " µ o B o ... 0. o µ '" Q) '" U} Q) .~ '" " .0 Q) ~ .a .. " Q) o .... , o .., 00 I': .... ... .c 00 .... ~ 'H o " 00 I': 01 .. I': .c " u u ... '" o ... ... 0 @ t ~~ g~ ~~ '" u " " 0. .c '" u :8 nI :> " ... I': .. 00" .... ... '" u "'0 I': ... -< ... o .,,~.~ "'... u '" .. OJ ... .., .. u a·... .... 0. " OJ <'" '" I': .. '" .., '" .... ... " o .., '" o I': .., .. '" '" .., Q) I': I': " Q) B .~ ~ µ , u " .. > ... " ..,'" .., .. u .... '" B o "''' .., 0 § ~ o U'H o " .c '" ... " U " ... ~ g .c I': '" " .. '" '" I': ... <II 0 ... µ .... U U} " .... ... > o ... ... 0.Q) .c o µ .... 0 , I .... .. U OJ .a o ... " .c ... "'~ .a 0; --g": .~~ e"; ~ g " .... -0... U '" " .. '" I': " ""Q) .... '" "'~ I': o .... ... U " .. " ... .... '" 1 'H 'H o ... o 1 I': o I': .. " I': .c .... ... " ... 'H " o.c .. I': " 0 ... .... ..... U '" " '" '" o. ... - ",," " " ... ¡": : 00 .... ~~~~ 'H 0 0·... .., .. .. Q)~ ... " < U 00 I': .... '" .... ... ... " > "" .. I': "" .... '" < 01 .~ ... U .. ... ... .., .. I': .. 00 .~ .., .. Q) ... U 'H o .... .. o 00 I': .. ~ 0. " > .... '" I': ... OJ I': .c " n 0.0 B ... 0·... U > I': " " .c ... '" " ... 0 I': .... "I': ffi 0 .-. e 0... .~ .c '" o " ';' .. ~ N '" 1 '" , '" co '" "" 0. 0. " '" ~ 1 co ~ 1 .~~ . "'''' Q) I': .., o U .... " ...'" u I': " 0 < U N '" 1 '" , '" co '" 0. 0. " '" 1 N .... ~ 1 c:: r-i. J0> '" c::.... .... '" III I!). J .... III:>' ..:.c::c:: .... 0 '" . JO ~ '" III ~C ) 0'0 ~ :>.~ . J~O '" c:: .c c::.... 00 ........ III .c. J.... ~"'.c . JE-< c:: III o '0 c:: C ) III O>C::C ) ........ E III "'.... . J. J 'OC:: C )....r-i . J"'r-i '" E '" c:: ..... J . J 3 g '" III r-i ~C ) r-i1ll0:> ·M·....,..; 0 o E C::. J 0 .o:.c ~ 0>'0 0 .... c:: ·I~~;Æ UJ . J.... 0 0111:> C ) c:: C ) I::r-i C ) ~ .,.... ~ +J .c C ) c::.c (/.I }.I..... u '" .... r-i ~ c::.c i:1. 0·... ~ cI> "" .c " ... .... ... ~ .~ .... 0 , ... Po ~'" .~ -g '" ... '" ~~ .... 5 o u Q) Q) ~.o ......-< ~~ "'.c Q) '" '5... .... " o . '" ] § ~"j ..-< '" Po;1 "" " Q) .~ .... '" Q) '" .., '" .c ... ~.... .... 0 tI) '" Q) '" "0 . .r4 ø.. ¡:: ~ ~ .~ .., Po '" 1110> .... ¡:: .... .coo Or-i .......... .c::s ~.Q c:: cv o>.c .... . J III o :>,. J I:: "''0 cv ~.c 00 .....'" . J E. J ~ '" C ) . J. J o r-iC:: '" ~'O cv ¡:: I:: '" cv 0>'0 c:: cv ::s .co E-<~ 0> .. cv ¡::.c . J .... UJE o ~ c::..... .... '0'0 c:: cv "'. J . J ~ III 0 C )p. C )p. ~ ::s i:1.111 '" :>'0 .Q. J 'd. J CVC::C:: c:: cv·... .... 0 ~.~ 'g CV'd . J . J"'''' C ) r-i 'd1ll::S .... 0 III r-i "'. J'" '" 0 .c.c . J. J~ 0> cv c:: :>..c CV~. J r-i'µ~ ¡:: ::s O>Q ..... I:: .... 0 III 'd.... '" r-ir-i .... .Q ::S::S:>. .Q p. '" ~ Q C::r-i .c.... cv E-<"':> E '" ~ "CV. J .c ¡::. J Q ..-t +J t.f) 'd.....'" r-i 0 :> r- .... .... ::s¡::~'" IQ 0 p.M .... . J~"" Q '" 0 o I:: "'000 .µ r-i·rl ....-1 I:: r-i. J o CV.Q 0 ~.c ::s Q i:1. . J P. III '" '" '" Q) .0 .5 ;::: ~~ '" '" ~&, u .... " '" '" '" " ... ""'" .... 0 "'.0 ~.~ 3~ ..-< Q) " "-<.0 .0 ~.., "" " . '" '" .c '" u '" ..-< .... "" o Ox ~~ ",Po ... .. .., 0 '" '" .. '" "'êJ, ~'H¿ o "" '" .... .. Q) '" "'''' o '" '" '" a .. o "...... '" c u ... Q) Q) ~ m.~ ..-<"'''' " '" '" u '" ~ N M ~ .c u " '" o ;J ';' '" ... .. :a ... '" '" Q) '" u >< .. .c u .... .c ;J " "" .... '" '" ... .... '" , .... .... o "" " .... '" ~ ... '" .. Q) .. .... .., Q) u '" .... .. " '" '" ..... .~ .. " o " . -" '" ... o .... ;J o '" '" ~ ...t ... u "" ~ .~ ... '" '" 0 "..-< o U u " '" .~ 0 " "'.c '" ... .c .... ... ;J g¡,¡; ..... .. '" Po '" .., Po .. o ~I'~ " .. ".0 '" '" "'.... ... .. '" .. ...... '" o Q) .0 .. ..-< '" ..-< " .... <3' '" '" Q 'd "'C::r-i ~ 0> '" 0>........ III III ~ '" r-i cv "'Q . J ~'5~§' o .... c::......... III o 0 Q cv .c. JIII.c . J¡::III. J .... cv E Or-i cv o p.'d . J ~ ~ '" ..... J"':> III O>Q Q Q C )M o.c ~ Q ¡::O> 1tS·r{ .. 0 . J.cCV. J III III .... Q "':>. 'O.c.Qr-i .¡..J .r-! r- r-i ¡::~ '" 0 0> '" '" o . J.... EM '''; U)....-t . J c:: ~.... ~0>Q p. Q .... .c ¡:: :>1II. J'd0 cv·... Q Q Q III. J .c.c'O::S0 E-<"'::S C ) ......clll ~O. J .~~~~ 5~ UJ r-i 0> CV :>."'¡::.µ r-i.c.... '" .µ. JIII'O..... .co ::s::s Q 1IIr-i 0 .,-t 1-1..... U""'¡ Q .....c I:: '" :r: '0 E-<.... 0 .c 0 ...... .... ;J", .. .....c o u o '" ... 1:: '" '" .. '" 0 '" .c "" " .c .... u'" :a~ ;J '" ~ $ ß~ g ~ t~ '" .... '" Q) '" 0·... ... .c ] .~ -53 ;3", ... " '" '" " .; ""..-< .... ..... '" '" .., ;J o " .,,;:g ~ tI) .... ...'" ....... 0·... o Po " " Po.o '" " u '" '" I c:: o ¿ ê 0 0·... U. J '" CV. J .c~ . JO p. :>'111 .QI:: '" 'd~ Q . J I:: ~.... 00 :>'111 . JQ ~ III Q 0 p.p. o ~ ~ ::s p.p. Q ~ .co E-<.... "'.... ... .c 0 '" ... .c ...'" @.5 .... ~ 8. ~ ... 0 ~~~ ;J .... '" 0 '" u ..... " " '" ~~~ .~ +oJ OJ ~-gU) ~ C\1 ~ .~ -ô] ... " '" ~ u ;:::: >.....-< '" .. .......0 ~1.d ..-< '" ..-< '" ~ ~ ~ '" ...-" ~ æ ~ E-<" ;J ... '" . '" æ ~. .µ .... ';:¡j: .~ ~ .~ tf) '~"'{j rG ~ ~ ~~.~ ... ~ 'H ¿ " 0 00 rG 'M' .... Q) CI Q) '" '" '" III RI >. t( ~ .... ¡::: k U 00 n:I b() CV E o .c '" o . J I:: o .... . J c:: CV III . J CV . Jill "'.... E O>Q c:: ~ .... p. . J o Q Q .c ~. J .... 'OC:: o c:: O>'d .... Q III'µ o .0: ::J '0 c:: .. 0 c:: 0 CV .c . J I CV c:: o p.r-i 0 r-i . J '" Q '" o.µ . J. J :>.....: '" 0 c:: ~ '0 ..... Q '" c::..c '0 'd "': . J Q .... c:: .c :>..... .c 0 O:.....~.µ¡:: o ¡:: .... Q 1110 ¡::.... III '" 0>.... 'd 0>.... 0 Q Q .c¡::1II ~ III 0·... ¡:: Q 0::J'd00'd P. III '" Z·...·... ~ 0 . J III ::J.r-i .... ¡:: o.'d: . III 0 Q III 0 0 "'. J . Q 0. "'::> C ) III 0 OJ·... "'.Q "'OO.µ .cr-i¡::OEr-i "'Q 0r-i . JIII~~~'" cd ·rl +J ...-{ 4-1 ;:: .c ¡:: '0 III 'µ.J,JQ) Q) ...-t ': 1-1.-1 "d ¡:: '" .Q OJ o>.c ........... J .... 0: .... 0> '" III·... 0> E C ) 0 .c ¡::...,..-< 0 .0: ~.... III r-i ... Q ¡::~~O>III .. 0 rU QJ ro·,..-i ¡:: o..c UJ . J . J UJ ¡:: .... 0 0 0 OJ 0> UJ..... ¡:: E·... : '0 UJ r-i OJ ¡::r-i "'.c . '" '" CV .µ . J : .... .c ¡:: 0>' 0 . J C ).... ¡::: ~ '0 0·... Q OJ.c ·~C )t;§ê.~ ¡::UJ",.co.c H::Jo.o.O~ c:: ::J 0 0·... O. J 0'" p. OJ ::s E 0 00 :r:o ... o -.. '" " '" ... '" ¡j~ 13"-< Po", ~:5 >", ~ ~ ;J " Q) 0 " .... ... """ " ... oM'M U ... § ~ 0·... " " "" '" " .... g¡,'8 .... '" "'..... "'.; .. .. '" 0 .. ... o U Po", m .. E-<~ o U " "" ...-1 .~ "'... '" " Po 0·..; ...; U ... ...; u ... ~ ~ "'Po UI " .. o.c u... " 00 ...; '" '" " o '" .. '" '" ..... Po '" ...; '" UI " o ...; ... '" .. ... '" " ..-< ..... ...; .. o UI ... '" ... ... '" ..... '" .. '" ... u '" ... '" .c u '" ¡S .~. ,j' o ~ u.... UI '" UI UI '" .. UI '" 00 '" " '" ...; '" "'.-. .c ...; ... " .0 ~4¿j '0 Po @ g UI ... '" "" æ ... " 0 '" ~ -5~ ~~ ~.o :;'" ...; .... '" 0 .c '" .~ ~ -5 " .. " 0 00 ...; '" UI ... .., @ "~J '" '" ... UI .. '" o ... '" u.c "'... .. ........ A 0 UJ .... .c o .... .c ~ ¡:: 0> .... UJ '" .... o . J ~ '" 0. :>. ¡::'d '" OJ . J ~.c 00> .... ...-< ¡:: O>~ ....r-i U)..-< '" .o:¡:: ~ Q) ...µ ¡:: ¡:: 0·.., .... (/)~ o '0 Q ~ . J..... "'..... ¡:: '" ..., I:: § ~ ......µ .....x H Q) ~ ~. JO 0'" ¡:: .c ~. J .... ¡:: "'~O> 0. OJ .... OJ ¡:: III ~ ¡:: Q "''0 . E 0> ~ ¡:: '" 0 .... .µ¡::~ ¡::.... 0. .... 0 '" ¡:: 0 0.0> ..., 0 , lI) .,.....¡ 0> UJ .~ '" JL; ¡::.... 0> '" 0 Q).... Q) .c III .....U). J O. J OJ ~ :>,.c Q.lrn.-l'µ .c 0.'" E-< .c..... Q) 0> 0 :>.... .. ..-( rl Q) OJ.., U) ~ o 0 ::J ¡:: OJ ¡::.., "'..... Q) 0 ¡:: Q) :> ::J Q) '0 Q) ~ .., .., ¡:: 4-11-1 If) .... 0 Q) '" .µ..... :>:..,.....'" ¡:: '" ¡:: Q) .... ¡:: E. J 0> ·ri Q} Q'rl '" 0 ¡:: ~ .., '" 0 ¡::..... U) .... 0. Q) Q) "'Q)0.c :>:H'd. J ..... '" ..... ..... '" '" ... '" '" '" Po... 00 ~~ ..~ "'", "'-" ,,~ UI '" 00 @ .; .c '" u "" '" ~~ ~~ '" ... ...; '" "'.c ... "'''' Po'" o ;J u '" ~ @ ... '" a .c ...; u ... ...; .c . ;J '" .~ § ~ '" " '" 00 ...; u UI·... .-. ..,-g Po '" .. '" "'..... "'Po " UI '" ...; u'" '" 0 ... '" UI '" UI..... "'..... :>: '" u u ...; ...; ... t m u 0 "'.., ..... " µ¡ '" .. '" o .~ ......... ~~ ..-<'" '" ... ... 0 "'.... Po", '" '" N U ~>< '" ~ 2 .c'6 ~ ç: ;J '" ..... " 00 00" ...; '" UI " .., '" '" .c "'" '" ...; ... '" '" .. .. '" U Po '" '" .... UI , ~ ,; .0 '" " u o '" Q.... '" u " '" ~ UI Q) ... ~ o Q) Q) ::J tJ' ~ '" E '" ..... o Q) UJ 0 Q) ¡:: '0'" .... ~ U). J ¡:: Q) Q) .c .., ¡:: '" o . J~ Q) '0:> Q) 0 .c o ¡:: '" 0 ..,.... ..,.µ OJ 0 Q) ¡::'n 0>0 .... ~ UJo. .0:..... '" .., .¡::~...~ (/) ~ o Q).c Q) ::J ~ Q) H.c "'. J :>:0 '" ... '" .~ .. Po '" ... o -.. '" " '" '" ... ... '" g.~ ... '" Po" "'~ .c p ... VI '" .... ... o 0 .... h "..... ~ ~ ... B .-. UI " '" u ...-t ..- .... .. ...; "" ... '" " '" " ~'.-4 '" .c'" u ... ...; '" .cPo ;J 2 " Po .~ .... "'.2 .., . '" ... .,,~~ '" .. Po ê '" "'... .... ...; .... o '" æ " '" .c ... '" .~ .... ...; ... " '" '" ...; .c u ...; .c ;J " "" .... UI .., ; ¡:: o '0 Q . JOJ 00 Q .... ~. J Q) 0 ¡:: ¡:: tJ1H ..., 0 U) 0> .o:¡:: .... ¡:: .. ~ ¡:: '" ~ I . J . J·ri ¡:: o OJ III Q) "'.c::J . J:> ~'µ.Q OQ . J c:: . J :>. "'OC::CVr-i~ .µo.c.....'" o ..... J '" ~ . J'd. J .co Q)"'C:: III 0. 'd. JNO E Q)..-t.,....¡ UJ ell III E ¡:: 'd .... .µ ::J.... '" Q .c ..... O>.µ E-< . III ~'" . J ..... J 0 0 ¡:: o O· Q) '.;; ¡:: .,;..... 'g ~ ~ .c. J0. J. J~C:: ..,::J::J 0'" Q)O> .Q'd ¡:: 0:>'''' ¡:: 0 00111 tJ'I ... ..... tIJ,...-t tJ'I .... 0> 0..... ¡:: III ¡:: III' 0 .,...¡ ...+J.,...¡ rl·~ .o:'d¡::'" "'III ::J O.c c:: 0·... rl U) .µ I:J)-..-i >- .. U H ...-i ..µ.,...¡ ¡:: ¡:: Q) c:: III·... '0 .... 0. 0 ..... .Q .... .... Q) 0 ::J (/). J·. J.c0.1II O. J"''µ Q) 0 0 ...... ¡::-nQ 0.c.....'" ...-i ,Q 'nrl U nj-.-I III ::J.Q .... ¡::,¡.J ·...1II0~.c0¡:: .µ 0 ~..., Q) ~"'¡:: 'µ'd Q) '" Q) c:: 0·... :> 0 0 0 Q) III 'd'µ .... 0. ~ Q) .0: ..:> ::J.... ~ ¡::O\~ '0 Q 0 ¡:: Q III ~ .µ........ III Q Q 0 .... . J ~ III '0 III ¡:: 0 .....::J III I Q)..... III E..... ¡:: \4-I'µrlU)(])UtT\ ..... .µ 0 Q) ~ ¡::.... o "'..... ¡:: 0..... III 00 '" , " ...; ...; '" ".... " _M O,J:J '" ........ '" " 0 .c S1~ 0.0 u ~ " ... 'M rei 0 ... " " '" " ß (\1 8 ~ ~ ~ ,,:;::: ... "'..... '" " O.c @ .0 ... .c ~.... "'H Û'" OM c: . ... '" " .0 o' ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~'>'~ o ~ ~ Cd c: o.~] .~ .. U .... ~ Q, ...-4 III ~.~ ~ ~ U U ~ g .... ...,.. 0 '" ....... ..-i 0 0 cu ~ '6 o.,J:J c: 0 ........... 'M O..-i UI '" '" >....c <'~ ~ IJ) g ~.~ .. .,.. .... ~~ ~ ~ ..--t .,.. 0 cu ~'U bOC: N tj\ I 00 I r- r- \D "" P. 0. ::J UJ I o '" I N '" , '" , '" ex¡ -<> "" Po Po " '" , '" -" , .-I .-I <IS .c: CI) CI) CI) aJ ." H ~&. ." aJ .....;.: ." aJ.-I.-I '0111 <IS ¡:: aJ eo.c: ." .... CI)CI) ." ¡:: '0 aJ ¡:: aJ e III E·" iù '0 CI) CI) I 01 Q III Q Q .-I .c:H.... .....c: ....¡:: .c: ." U - III ." CI).... .c:¡::H ~ 0 Q o U ¡::.-I 0.-1 <IS CI) 'O.QH ¡:: Q ~ .; @ H aJ ....Q H O¡::.... ¡:: CI) .-1111 Q .Q - U CI) HCD.... III '0 ¡:: PI;: III .-I¡:: CD U ¡:: .c:¡::CD ....." PI CD PI U 0 ." H .... CI) III III CD .-I H CI) PlÖI;: 1II ¡::.... ....." u.c: Q.~ ~ g Cl)1II....CI) ¡::.... CI) O¡:: '0 ." 0'0 ¡:: .... U CD·" U X ~ Q ....." CI) 0"" CD ¡:: .c: CD os.... ....H 00 E ¡:: EO·" ........ .... CD.... CD O.c: > ....'OOCD ~CD CD E';': N.c: '0 ." -~¡::O.-l CD.... o - PI CD ~.-ICI)'O.c: ....1II;: aJ.... ." CI) ¡:: ........ 01'0 o CD -." ¡:: ....'OCI)III CI) III ¡:: CD CD E·" '0.-1 ." .;.: CD S-I S-I ...U) CD CD :>< 01 ¡:: CI).c: ¡:: ¡::." +Jm·,-t.µ ":0 .... ........ )..f 0 (/) U} .. 0 .... .... CD.... CD ~.~~O@ ¡::....CI)CDCD ¡::.Q CI) .... H Q III CD·".... P<....E~CI) I PI o .-I aJ > aJ '0 .-I III ." .... ....¡:: ¡:: CD CDE '0 PI ." 0 CI).-I CD CD .... > CD 111'0 ÖI.c: ¡:: U ." ;: :><CI) .... ." 0 ........ ¡:: aJ CI) 'OaJ ." U ¡:: ¡:: III 01.... ." .... CI) ¡:: Q ..: aJ .c: ...... ¡:: .... ." III UJ '0 ¡:: CD 0.... ." III CI) U ~O >.-1 ." '0.... .Q¡:: ;: CD UJE CD .c: ....~ o e.... o H .... III ....¡:: '0.... Q 0 .... H aJ 0.... PI;: PI.... ;: U CI);: .... CI).... ." CI) .c:.... U .... ." 0 .c:PI ~PI ;: ¡:: CI) 01 ." H CI) III .-I 01·" ¡:: E .~..-& 'OCI) ¡:: 111111 .... CI) .... CD 0 CD .... CD .....-1 o ":0. OS :~! . ¡::.c: CD;: .... .-I 0 '0 o H'" P<ÖI~ CI) I CI) ¡:: .".... CD ¡:: 01 U ¡::.Q 0·" aJ OS ." (I PlPIO.... '0 CI).".... U.c: ¡:: U CD U OS <IS." :>< H ;: ........." UJ CI) ~ ~ .; '0 §, ¡:: 0.." :>< .." o .... H CD CI) ÖIUOS(l H¡::OS....;: .... 0·" 0 U ....:><Hp..c:;: ....OEU'O '0." aJ;: 0 CD........8(1 .... :><¡::¡:: 0. OS CD CD 0 'Ø.~ ~ >. .... ~ ::: CI) .... :>< OS . ." H.... .... H.... '" 'OOOSCDO ..... .-I 0. CI) CI) ÖI;: 0 CI) (I .... ." ¡:: U .... Q ¡:: ."." 0.0 01 CD .....Q.... 0'"0 OS·" .... CD OS CI) ¡:: .c:....OS.c: Q .... U 0..... CI).... .... (I OS ¡:: CD ¡::Q H¡:: Q .... 01'0 0 0'0 > CD ." 0. CD aJ H [/) 'iI-I =='.&J CDCD .....-1 ":E·"'O·"IIICI) ." .... CD E·" ¡:: .....Q....HOÖl o Q CD·" ¡::.... -;: p.p.CI) 0.-1'0 CI) ." OS ¡:: CD ¡:: UJ'O ¡::O.QCD 0 OOU '0." ." CI) :><;: .¡J .... H OS 01 OS.-l 0 OS CD aJ ¡:: E 0 ;: Hp.CI)·" ¡::H o CD CI).".¡J 'OOS.Q¡:: CI) ECD ÖI:><¡:: aJ·" ¡:: H'" OS 0 8....·" 0 (I E 0 Q CD.... ;: ." CI) U CI) CI) ·..-t·rI .Q .... CD 0.-1 0. CD ........ OS ¡:: '0 CD :aE ¡:: .... OS Q 0> o OS 01 01.-1 ¡::OS ." 0 .¡.JO ¡::.-I CD CI) H Q 0 H 0. CD Q .... H OS .... ¡:: CI) 01 ." CI).-I OS ":H Q '0 .. Q ¡::.... ." OS UJ o .-I.... n U.... ." 0 ....Q ..-t°n .-I.Q o ;: P<CI) o .... 01 CD I.. ¡:: .c: '0 CD (I ." ....CD'O.-I'O ¡:: CD;: o Ö' CI) Q .-I ....." ¡::.c: U (l Ö'~¡:: '0 Q ." ." CD '0 CI) H .c: 0.. U ¡:: CI) n Ö'OCl)CD t·~.... ~ @ n '0.-1 H n CD·".... :>< .... n .-I ....." .... '0 ....OE....CD ¡:: ." 0. CD -.-I.... III ¡::aJ O.c: n .....¡J (I ~Bg~e'-. aJ 0 n PI;: ....aJH .... ;: E 0 .........Q o CI) :><'0 ¡:: -.Q Q .... Ö' 0. ¡:: ¡:: ¡:: '0 n Ö' CD·" Q .c: ." ¡:: 'O.¡J CI) CI) n ;: HI. :><~'d &..: ~ ¡::CD¡::(I O.-l ..: 0.." ¡::.... 0 n ." .... -.... 'O.c: '¡::I" ~ ~ ~ ~ : UJ 0 > ¡:: .... 0. 0 ¡::." Q O(l ....OCl) .-I ¡:: 0." .Q'On 'O .... n ¡::HQ (I .... ....::I....¡::¡::CD ....0 Ö'Ö'> 0.... Q ."." '0 P<Ö'.Q(I (I n :>< .Q aJ .-I .Q ." Ö' CD .-I .... o ¡:: H o .... Q .c: .... CD .c: ~ -:>< ¡::.... CD·" CD ::I CI) 0 n Ö' ¡::.-I ." n CD ::I .QCI) ." ....> o .-I CD n .-IE .QH n 0 p.¡:: n u.... o .. ¡:: Q 0 .-ICI) .QH ." CD (l p. ." >n aJ n (I Q .....c: 0.... aJ .-I....aJ ';ci0g. ~ (I H aJ n n (I E o o 0.'0 ....H¡:: ::I n '00. aJ :>< .c:Hp. 000 n f1< ¡:: .¡.J n .... U n .-In .....-1 o n Q ~'O ¡:: ::I OCD.-I .c:o 'O....¡:: CD ." ....0 ¡::.....-I ." .-I n .-I n p.CD.c: .-ICI) ¡::.-I Ö'n CI) .,...¡ H'n Cl)n .c: 0..... ..: .'0 ¡:: CI) .~~. ;~ UJ·" n '0.-1 .-I.-I;: .-I." Ö' n ;: aJ ~.QH CI).¡J ." ;: .c:.Q o - ." Q .c:0 ~ n ' .... - .... ¡:: ::I Ö'CI) ." CI).-I .-I .-In .-I~ n ~Ö' ¡:: n ." '0 ¡::.-I n ." .c:;: .....Q .... CD CD.c: .c:.... .... o 0 .... ¡:::>< Ö'.-I ." .-I CI) n .... ..: ¡:: o N.... ...';'r-I ¡:: .... 0'0 ......c: ¡:: UJ 0 '0:>< Q CD ¡::.....Q ..... ¡:: ....::ICI) 00'0 Q E ¡:: Q 0........ H 0 X P<¡::aJ I H ::> ()I ¡,¡ p: 8 H ~ ¡,¡ P< :>: o p: f1< Q ¡,¡ 8 ~ ¡,¡ :< ¡,¡ .... '" M .... (I ." .c: .... .... o .. .... (I ." § ~ ." Q ....0. n .-I¡:: &.~ CD CI) .... n CD .c:Q ........ ." 0::1 ....ö' Q ........ o CD.¡J 'nO .Q¡:: ;: (I .-I .-I Q n .Q.c: (I .-I .-I.¡J n ::I .c:.Q CI) CD 010 ¡:: ¡:: ..... n ~ ¡:: 0·.... .-1'0 .-I.... 00 .... ¡:: Q Ö' .c:..... 8(1 I ¡:: HI 'OQ O ¡:: > CD OS 0 H 0 tJ'I.,;...-t '0 '0.-1 aJ .-I .Q ....n ....::I 0....00. Q Q .... '0 .... .... Q Q 0 0 .... ¡:: ¡:: aJ Ö'HO.... ..... 0·"·" CI) .... (I CD n ........¡::.-I ¡:: n Ö' n aJ ....." U ~ (/) U)'r-I n Q .... E -'0 0 1-1:>< .... CD........CI) 0. ¡:: 0·" ::I.....c: H 0 00.... -:>< 0.-1 .... :>< n ..... H:><¡::.....-I n3'µ C·ri·...... .............. 0. 0 oO.¡.J(I n 0. 00.... E - <lJ.c: <lJ ¡:: H .... .... ~..... - 0 0'0.-1 :><.... 0:>< ¡:: OO.¡.J ..: n ......c:.... ....UQ) :><.... II} 0. ~...Q~:><8 'O.¡.J¡::p. ." <lJ rt1 UJ ¡:: H - ..... 0 0 QJ Urt1.....¡.JU ...-1 +J .,.... .-I I::.¡.J I:: > .Q..... I:: 0 .... ;:j m Q).,.... ClJ p.,EE.¡.J(I .¡.J o - ¡:: ¡:: Ö'(I ." QJ (I 0 '0 ~.c: rt1 U ......... .c: H ~ o CD <=: .¡.JO n ..... .¡.J.¡.J (I rt1 n QJ U Q ..... .... -.... n .¡.J." I::.¡.J¡:: CD ¡::..... 'O<lJ .....'O.¡.J 00·.--1 Q.I Q QJ .....-1.... n ~.r-I Q. o U .... .... rt1 (I QJ ::I ~êg .... 0 'OU- '0 .... rt1 Ö'- ¡:: J.. ...-I H 0'0 ::I ......;: O '0.-1.... I:: 0 rt1¡::'O ..... QJ CD QJ E.¡.J U rt1 0 X Z<=:CD ctl N Oll) ~- .¡.J QJ '0> CD·" CD.... o X<=: QJ rt1 .c: .¡.J.¡.J o I:: .... <lJ o (I '00 .-I .c:o o ..... 0 .c:<=: ~ QJ '01:: VI (1).,.; I::.¡.J.-I Ö'rt1 ..... 0 :>< (l 0.¡.J .-I.... .-I QJ rt1 - 0. <=: rt1 0 o <lJ .... ..... .... 0. .¡.J rt1 o .... <lJ <=: I:: H·.-t 0 ..... .... 'O.¡.J.... <lJ :><<lJn ........ n 0 ....CD.¡.J o H p.rt1.¡.J E ;: <lJ Q ö'<lJ E-<(I .... .Q <lJ <lJ .-I.c: rt1.¡.J (I .c: .... 0 0·" .....c: ~ .... <lJ <=: ....0 ....0. o ;: 0:>< .¡.J.¡.J H 'O<lJ <lJp. (I 0 ;: H 0. (I ..... <lJ .c: .c:.¡.J U ..... .c:.¡.J ~ I:: <lJ I:: E Ö'p. ..... 0 II},-j <lJ :><> I:: <lJ ":'0 .... .. 0 <=:...... '0 ...-1 h'd <J) rt1 Q) U ClJ.¡.J<d .¡.J<=:,-j rt1 <lJ P. .¡.J.... (I II) ¡.¡ _..... <lJ .-111}1:: rt1 rt1 ÖI Q) Q).,.... p:,-j(l .¡.J:>< ClJ.¡.J <lJ .... ....<lJ P. <lJ 0 H .... n p' ;: ö'<lJ (I .c: .¡.J ....0 -.¡.J H <lJ ;: U o ¡:: ....rt1 .... '0.... <lJ <=: <lJ ClJ o X <lJ <lJ.c: .¡.J o .¡.J.¡.J rt1 .¡.J 0'0 <=: <lJ o - rt1 (I .-I I::p. Ö' ..... <lJ (I .Q .-10 rt1.¡.J .¡.J <=:.¡J <lJ 0 '01:: ..... U'O I:: I:: H rt1 ù '0 I:: rt1 I:: o ÖI Ç. >t·,...{ ,-j'O ,-j.-l 0·.... .c:;: ~.Q 'OClJ QJ.c: .¡.J.¡.J U ;: .... .... 0 .¡.J (I 'O I:: .... o n o II) <=: 'Ort1 Ç. E rt1 .... '0 0 <lJ .¡.Jrt1 0·.... ClJ U .... (I ClJ rt1 .... <=: Ö'<lJ ......c: (I .¡.J ;>..... I:: 0 ..: p. o .Ç.~"~ U).¡.J ........ o ClJ o > P:: 0 '0 <lJ .¡.J <lJ .....-.¡.J EN rt1 .....- > .-I ..... o .... (I ~p' <=: .¡.J : Ö' .....'0 (I (I <lJ'O <lJ .... <lJ 0 0 (I X ~ ..... <lJ E <lJ QJ.¡.J.c: ....O.¡.J p.<=: I 0 <=:O.¡.J 0'0 '0 <lJ.c: <lJ ....U.¡.J nj..-t.,..... .c:E .c: ~..... o .-I ..... .c:<lJ'O ~ U I:: <=: n - rt1 (I .... n <=:.¡.J<lJ Ö'Ç..... ..... CD rt1 (I 1-1 ¡:: Q) Q).r-i >0. ..... .¡.J H-<lJ 'O.-I<lJ -.... <lJ : .¡.J<lJ<lJ rt1 <=: .... <lJ > 0 rt1 > ..... ;: ..... .... 0 ö'.... p.,.¡.J(I 'O .,; .... o .... I II} ......... <lJ .¡.J(I Ç...... ......c: E-< ¡:: rt1 .¡.J'O rt1ClJM .¡.J 'O.¡.Jr- <lJ..... .¡.JEll) n H.-I ¡:: <lJ Ö' p..... ..... (I .¡J <=: <lJ 0 0 '0 ¡::..... .¡.J n <lJ U <lJ.... <lJ .... rt1 (I n (I <=: ¡:: <=:..... ":Ö' ..... '0 (I ClJ .¡.J <lJ <lJ rt1 .-I....,-j <lJ ;: <=:.c: 0 rt1~.-I ..... rt1 H QJ 0 E-<.¡.J ..... (I <lJ (I rt1 o 1::rt10>: rt1 U .¡.J.... rt1 II}O.Q ..... .¡.J Q <=: <lJ o (I .¡.J..... .c:.¡.JÇ. UÖI ...-1 Q)..., U)II}(I rt1 <lJ .... rt1 QJ o ..... > .... <lJ II) rt1 o .¡.J ;>. .-I ..... .... rt1 <lJ EO>: .,.,...-{ .....-1 P. <lJ (I .c: II}.¡.J <lJ U'O o Ç. rt1 rt1 <=: QJ ..: II) ;: .... .. ClJ '0.... rt1 0.... P:: 0 <lJ Ö' U Ç. ·rl·,.... >'0 .... rt1 <lJ 0 <J),-j (I Ç. Ö' ..... (I o ..... .-I .Q ;: p., I '0 <=: o rt1 <=:.-1.... <lJ - <lJ <lJ Ö'.¡.J.... <=: n ." > aJ .¡.J." .... <=: .... rt1 ;: p';: .c: ö' n (I o <=: :><- .QN (I rt1'O <lJ 0 .c:(I ~ O;: .¡.J ;: (I (I 'O I:: <lJ -Ö'<lJ U)...-t U <=: (I X Ö' ClJ ..... Ö' II) ¡:: 0 ..... .¡.J Ö'¡:: ¡::.....¡.J ." n 0 ¡:: ~ ¡:: H rt1 '00 ~¡::'O rt1 '0 .c: ¡:: Ö' 0 n ¡::..... ." .c: :><(I ~ .¡.J(I ." rt1 .... P. H ;: (I <lJ U <lJ ¡:: CD H ~ U).¡.JO <lJ rt1 .... .... ;: o .... '0 <lJ <lJ U X <lJ o .¡J .¡.J o ¡:: o '0 .c: o ..... .c: ~ (I <lJ ;: ö' rt1 .-I P. CD > ." .... .¡.J<lJ n <lJ ........ o E aJ CD .... ê ~ Oö' U(I .... 0, ¡:: I 0.... ;: ..... 0 .¡.JH(I .¡.J 4-1 ...·rl 0 tl) n3 U) 0:><.... .... ¡:: <lJ <lJ n (I .¡.J;: ......." ~ 'Ø..~ ß.~ ~ ~ ~ .c: (I >.... 0 0 '0 .¡.J..... - <lJ .-I U ¡:: '0 ¡:: - 0 ;: .¡.J 0 - (I U .... 0 .... - (I <lJ.... O.Q rt1;>.....0Q p..... <lJ..... .¡.J II) .¡.J CD ..... P. > .¡.J <lJ H.c: H.¡.J H<lJHn .... o ¡:: - <lJ.-I ;: P. <lJ.¡J(I .¡.J '0 -'0 0 - X :>< ¡:: Q. .r-! Q) .. U)·rl ç: 0 H 'n+J'"d4-lrtJÞ1 ;: -.Q 0 .... Q .¡.J<lJ0;: 0 -.....Q 011} '0 ~ (I 0 ;: ..... ¡:: 0 .-I Q .....¡J rt1 .... Ö' 0 (I .-I .¡.J.... P.¡::î<lJ.Q II) <lJ 0 ." H·.... >.¡.J -'0 ;: (I ....'0 (I ;: (I .¡.J." Ort1¡::(I .-I 0> o <lJ 0 _..... <lJ 0·" ¡:: ¡:: (I p. (I O.¡.J'µ·rl·..-IQ.) .,-t ..... ¡:: (I ÖI >:><<lJ;: -n (I ;>' QJ,-j.¡.J.Q (I E.-I rt1 'd .,1 .µ C::'rl rn,rl .... <d - <d .... P. - n ¡:: <lJ '0 <lJ (I .¡.J E.¡.J 0 E <lJ ¡::." 0·" 0·.... .¡.J..... '0 <lJ .... rt1.... :>< 0 E T1 0.. H ltJ c:: QJ .r:: .Q +JNn;1'n...U o UJ 'µ...-t 0 C::.r-! .¡.J<d1::;>.....0.c: :>< II) rt1 .Q p...... ~ c::.r-( H tJ'I .µ ..: X 0 .... I:: - n <lJ OO(l I::.... .¡.J ..... ¡::..... 0 ~.. -5 ~ ¿ ~ .~ 3 ~ ·rl )..... 0 U U] rl Q. .,.... ..c: ,"""·rl 0 IV .-I.c U)~'O.¡.J.-I'O."".¡.J N '" I IX) I r- r- '" = PI p. ;: U) I N '" I N '" I IX) I r- r- '" = P. p. ;: UJ I ,-j lI) I :>. 4-< {/) r:: r:: 0 .r:: ~ .-< 0 rd ~ 0·.... ~ +J +J 0 ~ '0 r::0 .r:: 0 ..... 1 'rd {/) {/) µ 0> QJ . '" -+J r:: {/) ~ '" r:: {/).-< .0 r:: p. r:: :>. ~QJ QJ..... r:: :>...... -0 '" r:: 0'0 QJ..... .-< rd QJ ..... :>. .-< o QJ IIJ ~ 0 .-<~ .-<..... 4-< ..... o QJ o E ::> QJ 0 µ ... ::> - '" ... ·rot 'µ·ri +J "'+J ... 0 3 rd N ...·rl·ri .0 E x rd '" 'OO>+Jµ N ~IIJ+J 0:>' r:: '" QJ QJ QJ..... IIJ :> IIJ (lJ 0 ... r:: '" QJ '" QJ+J 0>0 r:: ... .-< .o~ I:: QJ. µ rd .-< 0 "'..... -:>. , QJ '0 I:: ... ... ..... 0 r:: QJ .-< 0 0'0 (lJ .r:: ... 4-< P. +J '0 I:: ro .r:: QJ..... ..... QJ IIJ'-< '" .r:: ..... -.r:: .0 ... O>{/) 0 E :>'I::QJ'" , '6P.3 'Op. E +J +J+J .0 0> rd ..... rd .-< '0 QJ .0;::1.-< r- r:: 0 ~ 0 r:: .r::;::I ..... I:: .-< 0 QJ +J .r::..... 0 ....-< ..... ~ O+J '" +J 0 O>rd ........ '0 0 ... '0 rd+J ... 0.-< P. ... QJ ..... :> I:: 4-<(lJ QJ '0 QJ 0 I:: r- 0 ..... ~ I:: QJ ~ .r:: rd r:: .-<r:: - 0 0> o U) U) .r:: QJ 01:: '0 \D O+J 0>;::1 0 P. .r::rd {/) E·.... ::> (lJ +J µ rd IIJ (lJ "" -QJ r:: ..... '0 0 ;::I '0 0 +J {/) IIJ 0> QJ µ .-t n3......;::: r::.-< QJ :>'QJ IIJ ..... IIJ ... QJ ~:>. r:: ~ O>µ r:: µ ..... p. 0 P- oop. '-<0 IIJ+J 0 ... rd.o rdrd:>' I:: ;::I rd E {/).r:: rd ..... :>'rd +Jrd 0'0 '" r:: QJ QJ r::.-< I:: ..... .0 .r:: ... ... OrdO+J P. 1IJ0.r:: 0·..... ..... QJ r:: ..... r:: :> IIJ {/) 1::..... rd ... 0 (lJ QJ {/) ..... +J ;::I ......,,-f II} QJ'O 4-< QJ..... 0> 0 I/] QJ E µ:>. .r:: p. ....r:: rd UJ :>.0 ~ rd ':¡Jr::3 '0 ..... 0 rd QJ p...... 4-< QJ U) rd ... +J QJ o ~ ..... QJ IIJ I:: .-< I/] 0 .-< .-< 0 0 rd IIJ ... ... - I:: '0:>' ... :>''-< +J ::> 4-<1:: 4-< 0 4-<p. '0 0 -QJ nI"'O I:: µ+J.-< nI ~ 0;::1 o"'µ ..... o U) I/] QJ ... U) .r:::>'1:: I:: OJ rO·"" -nI QJ..... I:: ... (lJ ... .r:: ..... .;.:µ 0 rd µ 0 0> I:: '-<'-<+J +J '-<4-< ..... I:: 0 I/] I/].r:: nI QJ 1/]'0 I:: I/] r::..... rd O;::lnl .r::r:: nI '" ~ 3 ..... µQJ +Jµp. :> µ ·rI·..-i IIJ µ µQJI/]E 00 0>0 .,4 IIJ 0 '0 QJ {/)~ I/] 0 I/] QJ .-<.-< r:: Po p.o> ~.,4 0 .,4 0 .-< .-< ~ ...-f.r-t .,4 µ 0> .,4 :> .0 0 QJ QJnlO>... o.r::.-< '-<"'+J .,4 0 QJ '-<'0 .,4 rd IIJ'-< IIJ ... 0 r:: {/).,4 :>. 0 0 0 I:: QJ 1 QJ 00 4-<..... P. .,4 ... ;::I .0 r:: r:: 0 r:: .,4 r::µ ¿ -.-< .-< x x µ.,4.r:: .,. QJ:>4-< ~ ..... 4-<4-<nI rd .0 o QJ 0 {/) o ro '0 IIJ'-< .-< QJ QJr::I/]+J If1 QJ 0 0 -... 04-<.r:: ... N +J o.r:: :>. 0 I/] r:: ..... o ... 0 ... ( ) rd ro ( ) IIJ 0 , ... ... :>'+J nil/] o ro :>..r:: '0 µ+J ... (lJ +J 0·.... rd .r::o .0 ¿a;g,:>. 4-<0r:: QJ nllIJ r:: ~ .r:: r::o> ( ) ... .,4 ... ( ).r:: ... ...oµ 0 1/]..... I/] 4-<0 ~ ~.,4 ro+J ..; '0 ro·,4 IIJ 0... :> 0 ~ ~ ( ) o ( ) I:: .0 ro4-< '0 ... 0>'" I/] r:: IIJ IIJ ro'O'O QJ 0 .-< 0 0·,4 :> '0 ( ) .-< .-<..... ( ) ( ) 0"; OJ Q) ro +JlIJro '-<ro 1IJ.r:: r:: +J.,4 IIJ Po IIJ +J I/] ( ) '0 IIJ µ .-< 4-<0 ... r:: IIJ:> ... 0'0 ( ) 0>0'-< ( )+JQJ ro4-< ( ) ~ x r:: - 0 r::... I/] ro r::roµ ..... ( ) 0 r:: oµr:: ;::I ... ~ ... ro µ.,4 E 04-< r:: ( ) ( ) ..... +J ro ...-1 .µ Q) ..... ro .0 - P. 0 ro :>'01 ..... . ... nI IIJ ..... nI ~ ( ) o ro ......r:: ro.r:: ro IIJ 0 r:: ro4-< I/] I/] E .0 ¿ r:: ... +IN:>' +JO+J +J :> .-<... .-<+J IIJ +J 0> +J +J .....'0 rd µ00l ro ( ) rd '00 ... IIJnI.o 1IJ·,4 r:: ...... (I) 0 µ µo ( ) r::.,4 r:: r:: -:> QJ r:: r:: :> ( ) ( ) ( ) 01 ( ) 0 .o.r:: nI'-< ( ) E +J E I/] ;::I I/] 0'-< ( ) 01lJ( )µ IIJ o JJ'rl I/] 0 {/) ... ........ IIJ N 0 0 0.0'0 .,4 0 ..... ro o ~ .::> o ( ) a u ~ 'd.,.... ..... o...µ ..... E ..... ro ro IIJ .......... 0>'0 IIJ·.... ;::1.,4 ..... 0 ( ) .0 ro 0 ~ ... I:: ( ) .r::( )4-<~ .r:: p. IIJ .r::.-<~ .r::QJ .r:: .r:: .r::.o... .r:: I:: ( )..... .r:: .r:: p. rd .r:: .r:: ... .r::1/] .r::µ .r:: 0·.... µ o IIJ 4-< 0 0 ( ) 04-<0 o {/) o I:: or:: o 0 ( ) 01::1/].r:: 0 0 ... 0 o ( ) 01:: or:: o.r::.r:: r:: .,4 ;::I nI'-< ..... :>.... .,4 r::.-< .,4 ::> .,4 0 ..... 0 ..... ~ :> ·..-i·rl tl) 0 ..... ·ri µ JJ ..... ......r:: ..... 01 ..... ( ) .r-i .µ U).,....( .r::nI...o .r::r:: .r::oo .r::nI .r::( ) .r::..... .r::µo .r:: p..r:: ... .r:: .r::oµ .r:: .r::µ .r::.,4 .r:::> .r:: ;::I..... nI ;3:0+J0 ;3:rdnl ;3:00 ;3:0 ;3: r:: ;3:+J ;3:1IJ0I ;3: I/] I'-< P. ~ :3: I:: ro :3: :3: 0 :3: I/] :3: ( ) :3: ro 4-< P. 0 .,j ( ) 4-< 01 .c: ..... ~ .-< E I:: 0 P. tJ' +J+J IIJ 1 +J 00 :>. :>'QJ +J NIIJ ..... 0 +J ( ) r:: +J ftI +J.r:: QJ IIJ ~M :>. VI E , .,. ..... r:: ...... QJ'O ~+J QJ :>. .-<-ftI ..... ... ..... nI r- .-< .-< - QJ -§aJ~~~ ..... 4-< ro '0 ~+J ( ) .r:: ....... UJ,.-t M .o1lJ:> .r::E 1'0 QJg- o ( ) +J Po o .. r::r::1 .-< I ;::I ( ) QJ IIJ+J OQJ +J 0 QJ I:: 4-<( ) ..... ... r:: ·rl O...-t r:: p.1IJ ..... QJ M'µ ~ ... 0- 1::+Jr- 4-< E ( ) P.OI 01·.... 0 N 0'0 QJO~-4-< '04-< nlor- 0 1- '0 ... {/) ..... "'+J\D 00 '" - Po·,4 ;::IIIJ ftI ftI QJ &( )- :>. ( ) ( ) ( ) ::> QJ VI ·rl u~ ( ) I IIJ ~ nI ~:3&~~ ( )'O 'Oµr:: r:: ... p. ... >( ) UJ{/) ro :>,;::11/] o QJ 1/].0 r:: QJ ~ QJ o ftI .-< ftI :>. UJr:: r:: , ~ Po4-< ..... QJ IIJ ~ ( ) x:> QJ QJ QJ..... :> N ;::I QJ ro I:: 4-< 0 ·0 r- .-< .,4 .r:: QJ 0 IIJ ~ 0:> o.r:: QJ >. tJ' I/] ..... I/] ro o 01·.... u·.... ..... 0 0 ~p.~.r::+J E nI "'+JQJ X +J IIJ :>'1/] ::> 0 0 I::+J ·IIJ .-<..... 0 .,.+J +JQJQJ I/] QJ 0 .-< I/] QJ ..... IIJ ~..... 0 UJ ..... c- 0:> IIJ +J- IIJ o~.-< r:: +J 3.~ @ ~~ .-<.-< p. µ QJ rd'O QJ .:> \D .r::.,4 :>. QJ r:: r:::>. r:: ~ 0 r:: QJro ro rd U) 1/]'0 '-<::>UJ ::>0 "" o rd +J QJ ~ ftI ftI QJ ~ ;::1.,4..... o E.r:: p. p.- ..... QJ ..... ;::I .-< ... ~ '0 ~ag¡¡'O 0.0 0 0+J.r:: I:: .,4 +J ;::I 0 o p. :>. ....-< QJO'O OIP. or:: '0 4-< 0 +J X·,4 0 ...+J QJ P. .0 QJ 0 .r::r::r:: r:: Po 4-<ftI~ 0'; 1-1 ~ .-<QJ ;::1.,4 o ro ~ 0 Po.r:: p.ro µ I:: .µ.,.; (!j ..... '0 P. 1IJr- 'OQJ QJr- .r::.-<.-< 'OftI~ '0 E 0 01 I/] '0 O·rl 'Or:: ::> '0 .,4 - r:::>'O~- o ftI nI QJ '0 :>...... 0> QJ rd 4-< ;::I rd UJ QJ+J ftI 0 QJ 0 .,4.r:: I/] QJQJ'O -'OQJ4-< +JQJ :>.r:: +J ... {/) o 01 QJ .-< IIJ ~ r:: OOlQJer:: .r::1IJ O+JQJ .-<QJ:>O ~ .0 .,4 +J rd·rl I:: :> 001 ;::I ftI QJ 0 QJ ~ I ..¡ X·,4 :> -QJO QJ'O I:: ·rl .r::.r:: (I)·rot-,.; I:: r:: Po:> nI'-<X+J:> QJ 0 QJ IIJ 0 oeQJ p.QJ {/) 0 E 01'-< r:: IIJ IIJ ·rl·rl 1/1 I:: QJ ftI QJ 0 QJ IIJ I/] 1 E XQJ+J o QJ I:: N ~ 0·,4 ;::I I/] :>'01lJ 010 I:: I/] r:: QJ 1/1 +J 4-< QJ .. QJ ... ro ... 0 I/] 0> QJ .. IIJ 01 ·rl .µ ........ ~..... nI r:: I::O+J 0I.r:: :>. 04-<... .r:: 0 pox I:: ·rl4-< p.µ I:: I:: I/] ... 0 rdµ .-< r:: .,4'-< 0'0 r:: .,4 I'-< nI r:: 0 o +J QJ..... QJ 01 I/] 0 0 0> ..... :>. ..... QJ I:: .-<... Po ~.,4 +J r:: QJ..... 1/1 '0 QJ .,.. 0 ... 4-l r:: ..... QJ..... ·rl ~µ :> :>..... QJ IIJ 1/I0.r:: r:: ~ +J.r:: o~.o ¿ .r:: r:: rd·,4 O+J IIJ "''0 .0'" I/] IIJ 01:: 0'0 .-<:>:>. , ..... ~.µ QJooO+J QJ '00 ~ +J 0 QJ ... µ ¡:; .-<;::1 ... ro - ro'O ro M '0 .,4 I/] '0 QJ.,4 +J+Jr- '-<0 o~... - I:: ... µ ro .-<1/] 0> 01 '-<0 P. .-< ~rd~ If1 r:: ~ QJ QJ ~ ~ ftlQJ- .c: l,-t·.-t -'0 M QJ I/] QJ {/) 0 .-<..... I:: ..... au Hro 1 QJ 0 ...+J.r::QJ +JQJ or::ftI+J IIJ -0 r:: 0 .0 ·rl .0 rd'O ..... {/) 4-< :>'OM '0....0 :> .,4 '0 PoftlO '0 IIJI ..¡ r:: .,4 o.r:: 0 I::~ 01'0 3 r:: .r:: I/] QJ 1::01 QJ 0 ..... +J QJ +J..... -QJ QJ QJ .r:: I/] ::> O>N'O ro ..... E-< ·rl QJ I/] 0> ..... QJ QJ.-< rd'O'-< 4-<Oro +JO:> IIJIIJ.r::nI:> QJ :> ~ r:: rd ·rl-C: 1IJ.r:: I:: H .as I:: µ 0> .r::... µ 'd·rl nI e 0 I:: ~ QJ 0 '-<"'QJ nI QJ I/] rd4-< 0 i2 IIJ·.... ... rd µ rd I/];::IM I U) .µ c: HOE 01 - ... e ro ftI I/] 1/1 1/]4-< 0 1/]..... '0 rd I:: :>. ( ) rfJ E QJOM Q) ;:::j...-t 0... QJ .,4 .-4 - nI QJ ~ &r:: r:: QJ QJ 0 r::+J +J.r:: I:: µ¡ 0 0>'-< :> I/] 4-<(lJ +J µ00l op.... I/IftI'O ~ 0>1IJ.r:: OO+JQJ o ~ ro Po Oµ ..... H '0 QJ UJ 0.0 rd 0 0 QJ ro ... QJ ... QJ r:: 1/1.,4 .,4 .,4 E-< QJ. .,4,-< QJ 0 ;::I µ I/] QJ rd E Z .-< .-4+Jµ'O ........4-1..., 'O...QJ .-4QJ+J.,4'O :>. .r:: IIJ+J ~ +J QJ I:: '0 QJ µ¡ '0 '0 t9 :>.o<t: 0 0 00> 0... ftI'O ftI r:: "'~+J ... nI o HI ..¡ ro o QJ E UJ :>'QJ 0>1:: QJ 0 H I:: ...-t tJ'I........u ..... .-< rd o QJ r:: IIJ rd (!jN·,- r:: QJ ''0 ::> QJ ;::I ... I/] rd ::> µµ I:: ::> µ ..... UJ rd r:: :>r::1f1 :> .-4 0> nllIJ ·n ~..... (J) "'M ~ 0:>'0 ... Po QJ {/) p.::> I:: ..... I:: ·rl ·rl ... ..... ''';('') QJ o r:: ..... +J .r:: .~ Aj 3~ ~ 0- .,4'0 QJ... +J HI/] ...:I ... rd 3:>' I/] µ ç¡ .r::.r:: .r::µ ,.r:: ;:: "' 'rl or::u Po QJ +Jrd+JQJ I/) t: nj...-t e.r:: '0 o<t: o ... o I:: I 0 µ¡ µµ Urn....-t'µ o µ I:: Q) QJ..-t .-4 .-4 ..... eoµ 0 oµ I:: 01 ::> H 0 ro H .r::o> .-<m 4-< (lJ E-< ...-1....... ·rl'-< .,-i c: H p.:>.r:: 00.-4 H ... QJ ~.,4 ;::10;::14-< 0·,4 tJ'4-< ro ::> 0 u µ .-< 4-< .-< H 3 3 ;::Q)(")4-t .r::OQJ UJQJ3 PO+J·,40PO I'-<+JVI o<t: +J '0 ftI U{/)IIJO µ,IIJ ~ µ¡ ;::I :>. 0': 0 (>1 (Q :3:...M 0 :3:00 Po rd.o 4-<·rl H 1/]'0 UJ QJ .r:: ;I: I:: QJ QJ H QJµ 0 O>µ .c: .,4 .-4 ¿ ;>¡ .r::QJ .r::·rl .Q ~ ·rl·rl .Q ~ e (Q E-<.r:: E-< 3 rd Po UJ.o rd If1 \D If1 If1 rl rl .,. .,. '0 <1J .<: U 111 .¡J .¡J 111 1/1 111 I:: 01 .... I:: 1/101 .... :-'1/1 I-< OX 1/1 <1J 1/1.... <1JJ:lo U 5 U 0 111 U .. 1/1 I:: 1/11:: 111 1/1 0 <1J.... I/II::.¡J 111·... 111 1/1.... '0::1::1 <1J.o U '0,.... ........ 111 :>.¡JU 0.... 1-<::101 J:lo51:: .... <1J 111 3 .0 0 ........ ....0.... .... 0 111<1J.... '<:1-< 1/1 ::1 <1J .¡J.<: I/IU.¡J I:: ::1 011-<:-' .,-i 4-1..0 1/11/1 '0 I-< <1J <1J 0'<: 3 .<:.¡JO U .... 1::0.... "';.¡JetI I-< <1J '0::1 µ 1::0 f'dQJro4-1 I-< I-< 1/1 111::1'0 <1J ::1 0 <1J .<: tJ1.<: <1J 4-I[/)+JU X .¡J-'O<1J 1110 <1J 01-<0 'O0'Oµ <1J . I:: .¡J0::1.¡J .¡JO'<:O '~..-I ¡::: 5-<1J I-< I:: <1J '00111 J:lol:: <1J 111.... I-< <1J 1/1 111 111 .0 ::1.... O.¡JI-<.... .....<:.... 0 111 .....¡JI::O.¡J 111 ........ 0 '<:'0 .....¡J 1/1 <1J <1J I-< .<:.... I:: 1/1 'O.¡J 0·... I:: I:: 01 ::1 '0 .¡J 1/1 .....<: I:: <1J I:: 1/1 0 <1J 01 <1J :-,........ I-< I:: <1J 1/1 o 0.0 <1J .<: 1-<1-< U 1-<'0 111 0 I:: <1J1::::1'<: 111 J:lo 111 tJ1 U 1/1 I:: ,-I-a.> rtl 111....:>- 1::-00'<: .~ <1J~g g .¡J I:: . 1/1 ...... o.µ 0 '0 <1J0- '"d4-lQJr-i'<:J' ...;0....-- 1/1 I:: 01 .... 1/1 .... o . I-< 1-<' I:: <1J 1/1 <1J'<: <1J 01.¡J 111 .¡J fIII.<:·... I:: I::.....¡J 1/1 <1J.¡J <1J.... UJ:lo u.o :-, <1J <1J 111.....<: 01 U 01.¡J I::.¡J I:: X ~ 1/1 0 .... <1J .... <1J I:: J:lo J:lo OJ:lo J:loI/I O~ o 1/1.... '0'<: 01 .<: <1J <1J <1J 1/1.... I/II::U.¡J 1/1 .... I-< 111 <1J etlI/III1U'<:01 ::1 J:lo O.¡J I:: 1-<.0 .... .... o :-''0 I·.·..P.... M Q)r-I ¡::: 0-.01::111 '0 O.¡J <1J1/I( ):-' 1/1 3 J:lo I:: 111 . ( ) 0::1 o 51-< ( ) ....0 <1J1-< ....I-<I::( ).¡J.... 1I1010@ß( ) 1/1 1-<'0 I:: U.<: .... 111 ( ) .¡J ........1/101 s.'g~¡,.~ § ........ <1J I:: J:lo . 1/1 1/1 1/1 <1J J:lo'O 3 011-< ~.E.2.~~ I:: ( ) 1/11/1.... ( ) .....<: :-,.... .....0 'O.¡J........II1.¡J I:: 0 ( ).o I:: '0 111 :> 1111:: ( ) ( ) .¡J 1-<.... .¡J....'O'O 1/1 O.¡J 1/1 ........ ( ) U <1J :> <1J.>(<1J ( )( )O I-< I-<ri( ).....o I-< ....1I1....:>Po J:lo J:log~ @ ~I-< ....<1J UX5( ) -UI/I<1J( ) .<: .....¡J.... ( ).¡J ( ).... ~.... I-< 5 I-< 1::"" <1J0 0111::1 o o E Ur... 1::"" .¡J <1J ( ) <1J I:: 111 ....0<1J I-< ( ) 01 111 I-< ~ 111·... I-< ::1 '00 tJ1( )0 I/I( ).... U.... -X "'( )I:: .... 1/1 XI-<.¡J .... ( ) ( ) I/I.¡J ( ) ~.... 'O<1J ( ) U ( ) ( ) I-< U 01 111 X 1::::1 <1J.... tJ1 J:loI/I OJ:lo .¡JO- '<:0 .¡JI/IO o 0 ~ I-< 00 ..... 0 I:: .... 01'0- ..-i<1J I/I.¡J'O .¡JI:: 1-<.... 111 o E 1/1 '<:1-<::1 U ( ) 0 ~ J:lo'<: 111 .¡J ( ) -.0'0 .... ( ) -....1-< ....'0 ( ) 1111:: ~.<: ::1 01/1'<: µ U).... <1J'H 00 'd.... J:lo .<: U .... ·rl 0 '<:'H 3 'd <1J <1J 01µ 111 111 U) .... U) <1J <1J J:lo<1J 50.... 111 ....U)U) 111 U) .,.... Q) ~ U ~ 0 ~',.... 4-I <1J U) ~E ~ o .... U 111 :> ~ .... o 0 <1J ~µU) ....~.... ::1 0 0 ........ 3.¡J :-, 111~µ rl Q).,.-i .¡J'd <1J.¡J0 .~ 111 ~ 3.¡J0 .... U U ( ) <1J .<:....111 µ.... 0'00 .¡J :-'.¡J ~ 0 I-< ...;~o .... 111 <1J .~ @ U ~ <1J ~ .<: 'M'd ..µ .... ~ PoIl1~ ........ <1J.o .<: 'd µ ( ) <1J .<::> ....µ.... o 0 .... :> <1J 0 I:: @ :;:¡.... ~~:-, "'µ '0 ·rl ~ U) :> cd Q)..... ....U)µ .Q..... u E 111 <1J <1J .<:........ µ J:loO U) U) - <1J <1J <1J U)'<: U ~ Ul µ......,-i <1J :> U) ~ ~ .... ;: .... 0 <1J,Q U) U) ;: 'O <1J .0.........<: O"'.¡J ....U)Po o ..-t4-1 :-,UO 'OµI:: ~........ µ ....'01-< U .>( 0 J:lo;: <1J~<1J] '<:0'<:0 E-<U.¡JU <1J .<: µ I:: <1J 0.... .... U),Q <1J U) 0 U <1J E ¡:: ¡:: 0 111 .,-t .µ .µ U);: J:lo ;: '" <1J .0 U 'U '" 0 '" .¡J .<: :-, .¡J '0 U ...... ell s:: 3.¡J<1J .... 01 ¡:: E '" O·rl ........'0 .¡J .... Uµ1I1 <1J 0 U ¡:: ¡:: ¡:: .¡J o .¡J.... U::1'd ,Q<1J I:: .... .... . U U) '0111'0 <1J ¡:: .....<: 111 <1J U ....::11/1 ....U),Q o ;: ..... U) U) U ( ) <1J UI/I.... ........... OJ :> E :> .... <1J 111 <1J .... .... UJ J:lo.¡J ....U) 0111 .¡Jµ ¡:: J:lo <1J <1J E U <1J X 01<1J 111 ~ 1I1.¡J E ¡:: <1J ~.2 .....U) 'd.... 1::.... 111.0 111 .¡Jµ ¡:: U) 111 <1J J:lo '" ::1 <1J U:>r- U·... 0.¡J1f) U,-i . ( ) .........,. <1J.... ¡:: 0 ¡:: 3 U 0 o .... .....¡J <1J 0 U .<: ( ) .¡J.... U) 111 .... Po I:: Q·ri·...... U <1J¡::'O @.~~ ~ J:lo.... :> ( ) <1J 0 .<:.<:.... E-<µJ:lo U) U) <1J ¡:: .... U) ;: .0 <1J .<: .¡J .... o .... .... o .0 ~ U) I'd U) ¡:: U) 111 <1J ¡:: U) .... 'd U) 0 ;: 0 .001 .... o .. .... 01 .... ¡:: <1J.... .¡J3 X 0 ( ).... .... ;>'0 .0.... 'O( ) <1J'<: ·rl.¡J .... ........ 111 0 U <1J <1J .... 010 111 E U) U) I-< ( ) 0 E 01,-i ¡::- .... U) <1J .... ¡:: .¡JO I-< <1J 0 :>.¡J 'd 111'0 ( ) I-<.¡J 0·... E .¡J.... ¡::.... <1J µ <1J ¡::,Q o U.... .... QJ 111 .<:.<: E-<U) N '" I 00 , r- ....1-< ;: o.<: 'H......¡J 3 '0.... 111 ¡:: 3 ....II1QJ I-< ;>'U)QJ ~QJ'<: "'U)µ ·rl O1EI:: ~ <1J 0 ....- H·..-t ~ J:lo.¡J I-< U QJ QJ QJ U'<: ¡:: ¡::.¡J¡:: o 0 U ¡:: U o U) I:: OJ 1/1." 01( ) 111·...'0 I/IµQJ U)'rl ~ QJ :> QJ E·... .... µ.... ( ) U 0 ....111 .0 1/1 111'0 QJ QJ ( ) U 01.¡J .... ¡:: 111 :> 111.... I-< .<:( )( ) UI-<U) r- '" "" J:lo J:lo ;: UJ µ ¡:: ( ) .E U) .... .... .0 111 µ U) QJ ( ) .<: .¡J .... o ¡:: o .... .¡J 111 U .... .... .... .¡J ¡:: QJ '0 .... I-< ,QJ .<: .¡J o I-< o o 01 o ,..:¡ riI '-' ...; UJ UJ riI :E: '-' Z H UJ H E-< p: riI :> ~ Q ~ UJ Z '-' H UJ X riI ,..:¡ ~ o U U) U) riI Z H U) ::> :Q , H E-< ,..:¡ ª I ,-i r- If) , U) U) QJ I-< '0 'd 111 QJ .<: E-< E-< Z riI E-< Z o U .j ..ó 111 .0 U '0 QJ 01 .... '" r- 00 If) ,-i If) ,-i ... ... QJ I-< ::J .¡J U ;: I-< .¡J UJ 01 ¡:: .... I-< ::1 U) 111 QJ :E: U) .¡J .... E .... .... ¡:: QJ·rl U ¡:: ¡:: QJ "'3.... U) - ¡:: 0 01'0 QJ·rl.>( .....<: ¡:: QJ .<:.<: I-< QJ'O U)·rl QJ µE-< 0 I-< I-< U)U 3 ::1 0 U) X E QJ µ 111 U) QJ o . E 111 U) 111 ....'0111 QJ.... .¡J ....QJI-<.....<:....'00 U4-4 ,µrlQJ¡:: I': 111 .<: QJ.¡J O'....01U....U)I':U) .... J:lo ~ ::J 0 µ ;: QJ (/} 'M U} ·rl 0 0 tI).¡..J [/) U'd QJ·rl.... ¡:: ~;>. .<: OQJOIl1QJE µ µ J:lo.<:·rl....,Q QJ .... J:lo 3 .¡J J:lo .<: ( ) ::1 1I1U)....µ µ..c: U} rl rl ...-t r-I II1U ....::J'd1l101 ·rl·rl ;>. 111 0' .<: I': µ.<: I': 3 QJ QJ U).... ~ 3 111 .....<: µ Q) H µ U} cO H II OJ 0 H IlJ H rl Q)l/)"(j wauftJ QJ( ) '" ....¡::;: <1J.<:µII1Po Hr-I r-I).....¡ 4-I·rlr-lU..aJ 4-IQ) rd~ rd~4-I'rlrdUCOr-l II] QJ ::1 ¡:: QJ ··rl QJ 0 'd 01 ¡:: QJ 111 I': ( ).<: tJ1 111 . .<: ~;>. I-< µ '" ·rl 'H .<: µ 01 QJ U) U..aJl/l·rl4-l"µ OrdQJC'dO ..aJC·rlr-lQ) rd HO Q)·rlrlµ·rlc'µQ)'µQ).rlQ)U1~Q) ........µ.¡JQJU).<:.¡JPoIl1 ::J ....0:>3'd 1':.... OU) H[/)µrtl[/)eCO'd~c'rl 'rl'drd~ ¡:: Q)... OJ rei +J ..-1 ru).....¡ Q)'µ µ U) U Q) Q) 01U).... QJ'<: J:lo.... ¡::'d;>' 01U) U,-i '" QJ I':'d <1J'd ..-i1::.........¡JEO<1J ¡::01'>(::J;: ,-i1-<~~~'<: U)rdrtl~ 0 Ul).....¡rdS::U HrdOrl OO.µ- ( )E¡::¡::UU)QJQJ ~1I1""µ'<:Up.;>'1 If) II1Eu)1I1 o I::.¡J.....<:.<: E,Q OU)U)QJE,-iO'd'" 4-I~Q)tjQJ·g~~~~QJ~Hc'd8~~~- O"O~Q)rdrl·rlH ~~~rdOOH ill ·riQ) 'µ).....¡Cr-Irl H 'µrl ·rlOQ)rl » 111'0 ........ ·0........ p.p..¡J U)U'O.rl ~ ~ ~ aJ~ ~ ~ g e ~ ~ ~.~ 8 ~ g.) U} H ~ ~ 111::1 ....O.<:QJ~QJ.¡JO 'd,{)::J~""~QJ ;>. J:loll1uuu.....¡J....QJu.¡J .>(UUQJ ....QJµ QJE( ).... ~.¡J~,Q01 ....QJu....II1.<:'{),Qu.... .<:O....~I-<.<:X....EO....II1.<:"'II1....µ¡::II1I11O E-<UII1UO)~~QJ.¡JOPo.¡J,QU,QOIl1E-<........ . ~ ¡ I ; I I I I .>( U U 111·... 1-1.... .0 .::1 I-<J:lo QJ ) 1-1 00 .¡J QJ :-'Di .¡J,{) ...-1...-1 ....1-1 .... .0 .¡J ::1 .¡J '1:: .¡J1I1 1-<1-< O'{) J:lo;>' J:lo'<: ::1 1/1 - .¡J 1-<1/1 00 Pol:: ( ) 0 .... Po·... &@þ, ........ ;>. .... .¡J -u .....>( 1/1 ........ ( ) .... 111'0 .¡J3 ::1( );>' '() ¡:: .....-1 rd ( ) 1/1 U .... I:: ·0 QJ( ) ....1::;>. O.¡J -.¡J 1-1 ....I/I( ) .....0 J:lo .... I-< 0 ....::11-1 UUJ:lo .¡J1I1 U 1111/1 1-1111 .¡J'<: .¡J 1111:: Di 0·... .¡JU) 'O( ) ( ).<: 'O.¡J ¡:: QJ.¡J .¡JO I:: I:: .... 1-1 I:: 0 Di .... I-< U) ( ) .<: Di.¡J I:: ( ) .....<: U3 ::1 'O.....¡J 001:: I-< ( ) J:loI/I.¡J , U) I:: '()( )O ¡::.... U ::1'{) o I-< ( ) U)II1Di Dietl ;>.QJI/I ¡:: 1-1 U) 111 ( ) ¡:: 5 1/1 0 ·.....·rot ¡:: .¡J <1J .<:I::.¡J U( ).¡J .... .¡J.... ~~~ :-, 111 3 , .... o , .¡J .<: Di .... 1-1 U .... .... .0 ::1 J:lo 111 1-1 ( ) :> o I-< o I:: .... ( ) ¡:: .... E 1-1 QJ .¡J <1J '() o .¡J '0 ( ) U) ::1 QJ ,Q .... .... 111 ( ) .<:U U) I:: 111 U) ¡:: ¡::.... O'{) ·rl .... .¡JO 111 ....U) ::1.... U.<: .....¡J 111 U ~ .... 01 ~'O .... <1J 3.¡J 0111 ........ ....::1 ODi ....( ) .... <1J '<:1/1 E-<1I1 N '" , 00 I r- 1/1 ;>. 111 ) .<: Di .... .<: U .... ¡:: QJ U 1/1 ( ) .¡J 111 .¡J 1/1 Di I:: o .... 111 '0 ( ) .¡J .... ,Q .... .<: o I-< J:lo 1/1 .... "" I': .~ ~Q. ~~\Y) Q :E: r- '" "" H H J:lo J:lo ::J UJ <:.I H ~ ~ E-< ~ ~ .... If) o µ. QJ ON.... QJU)¡::-,Q N.¡J 111 ·'- ·rir-l4-1 ): U} rlrlO '{)111"'.... '()o:.<:.<:.... Q) rt1 U'J I rd 0: QJ .... §, ~ § !3 ij.rl::J E o U} .µ "d'M U U ~ X 01::J1I1111 !3.~ toE E'd U) ) QJ QJ ·rl s:: .µ.c: N Xftj.µ .µ.r( (( .µ ~ '"(j UJ E U) 0 QJ U) QJJ:loQJQJ¡:: QJ<1JP.UE01 .<:....::J X·...·... E-<.... 1/1 QJ.¡J 1/1 I If) If) I ~ Di .... 1/1 .... o o I-< 111 1/1 .... '() QJ .¡J U ( ) I-< QJ U) ·rl " UJ Z o H E-< ...; ,..:¡ ::> U ,..:¡ -< U .<: U .... .<: ~ .<: U .... ~ .<: U .... .<: ~ ...; riI ~ z '-' H UJ ;j ~, 1/1 .¡J ,-i r- If) ,-i r- If) ,-i .,. ... 4.15.12.6 COMMERCIAL (HC) and MIXED COMMERCIAL (PD-SC and PD-MC) DISTRICT The following are permitted within these districts as further regu- lated below: SIGN TYPE AREA HEIGH:[ SETBACK # ALLOWED ODŒR (Maximum) (Maximum) (Minimum) (Maximum ) lal v.œ: ID.I Freestanding 32 sq ft 12 ft 5 ft 1 per highway One sign is allowed for right-of-way aach lot with 100 feet frontage of continuous highway right-of-way frontage.* FŒ BAœ ESrABI.ISIImRr Directory 24 sq ft 10 ft 5ft 1 per intersection Projecting 32 sq ft MaxÌ,mum height 1 per highway 20 ft below right-of-way top of fascia frontage or mansard Wall 200 sq ft Maximum height N/A Per establishment. 20 ft below 1.5 sq ft per 1 linear top of fascia ft of building frontage or mansard Temporary 32 sq ft 10 ft 5 ft 2 per lot 4 per year for 60 days per highway See section 4.15.11 , right-of-way frontage Signs bv Special Use Permit: a) Off-site advertising signs; b) Electric message signs. Each establishment shall be limited to a choice of one (I) of the following: Projecting or wall. & See section 4.15.12.d. (Adopted 7-8-92) -57.14- (Supp. #68, 9-9-92) ,. . COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 -3/-;?5 AGENDA TITLE: VDGIF Grant for Accessible Fishing Pier at Chris Greene Lake. AGENDA DATE: AprilS, 1995 ACTION: ITEM NUMBER: 7'5: cJ¡/ cJ5: c://~ INFORMATION: SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: Request for a resolution authorizing a request to the Virginia Division of Game and Inland Fisheries for funding assistance for an accessible fishing pier at Chris Greene Lake. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: AITACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Mullaney REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries has limited funds available in 1995-96 to assist localities in providing fishing facilities that are accessible to the disabled. The COWlty'S ADA Transition Plan includes the construction of an accessible fishing pier at Chris Greene Lake. The Department of Parks and Recreation is in the process of implementing the projects listed in the Transition Plan and would like to compete for a VDGIF grant. DISCUSSION: While project plans have not been completed, it is estimated that the project will cost approximately $50,000. The project will be funded from the existing appropriation for ADA improvements at the COWlty parks. The grant program will provide successful applicants with reimbursement of $25,000 or 75% of the total project cost, whichever is lower. The deadline for applications is April 27th, 1995. The application package requires a resolution of support from the governing body. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the enclosed resolution authorizing the COWlty Executive to provide the necessary materials and to enter into such agreements as necessary to qualify for a VDGIF grant. VDGIF 95.041 -.'. "\ ì ~ © œ U WJ Œ i ¡ 't .... ,"',',"-' .....-. . .. "",~-.,,''''.,.. '".....~.'" J ' ' :l' .! 3.- . RDOF '-"'~'-:'''''''--';-'''''''';'' , \. DaV1d P Bowerman ChMloltl:'svll1e S(I)lr"V11I" COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McintIre Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296·5800 Charles S Martin K,I)i}nn,I Charlotte Y Humph"s LICk .)ou('lI Walter F. Perkms White H,\1i Forrest R. Marshall, Jr Sally H. Thomas S,I1TllJ(' MiI "f FROM: Pat Mullaney, Director, Parks & Recreation Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC (3JJG MEMO TO: DATE: April 7, 1995 SUBJECT: Resolution adopted on April 5, 1995 At the Board's meeting on April 5, 1995, the Board adopted a resolution requesting funding assistance for a Chris Greene Lake Accessible Fishing Pier. The original of that resolution is attached for your use. EWC:len Attachment (1) <Ð Printed on recycled paper , II RESOLUTION FUNDING ASSISTANCE FOR CHRIS GREENE LAKE ACCESSIBLE FISHING PIER COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries provides funds to assist political subdivisions of the Commonwealth of Virginia in developing new fishing access facilities; and WHEREAS, the County of Albemarle desires to develop an accessible fishing pier at Chris Greene Lake as described in the County's ADA transition plan; and WHEREAS, the funding available from the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries for fishing pier projects is limited to 75 percent of the total project costs or $25,000 whichever is lower; and WHEREAS, funding necessary in addition to the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries share to complete the project will be provided by the County of Albemarle; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle that the County Executive is hereby authorized to cause such information or materials as may be necessary to be provided to the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries and to enter into such agreements as may be necessary to permit formulation, approval and funding of the Chris Greene Lake Accessible Fishing Pier Project; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the County of Albemarle hereby agrees to accept all maintenance responsibilities, and keep this facility reasonably open for public use for the expected useful life of the project. . . . * * I, Ella Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Boar of Su ervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia at a regular meeting held on . S I /9 ~S- , David P. Bowennan Charlottesvi!1e COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Aprll 12, 1995 Charles S. Martin R ivðnnd Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr Scoltsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miner Mrs. Nancy O'Brien Executive Director T. J. Planning District Commission 413 E. Market street, suite 102 Charlottesville, VA 22902-5213 Dear Mrs. O'Brien: Please note the attached staff report on the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with the Jefferson Area Board for Aging (JABA) in relation to a capital request for a new adult day care center. The Board, at its meeting on April 5, 1995, discussed this staff report and voted to approve the staff's recommendation at the end of the report. However, instead of convening the six jurisdictions to review and revise, if necessary, the initial agreement, at the request of Mrs. Thomas, they agreed to ask the representative members of the TJPDC to do this work. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Roxanne White, Assistant County Executive, 296-5841. Sincerely, ~~a0l, ~~rk EWC:len Attachments (2) cc: Roxanne White Gordon Walker * Printed on recycled paper " EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 -: d/-¿' S- GENDA TITLE: oint Exercise of Power Agreement with the Jefferson Area Board or Aging (JABA) AGENDA DATE: April 5, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: j?.s:t:?..Yð~ 2~ INFORMATION: X ACTION: SUBJECTIPROPOSAURE UEST: eport on Joint Exercise of Power Agreement with the Jefferson Area Board for Aging (JABA) in relation to Capital Request for a new Adult Day Care Center. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: .,... STAFF CONTACT: . Tucker, Ms. White REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: At its March 3 meeting, the Board reviewed a request from the Jefferson Area Board for Aging to contribute $100,000 to JABA's capital campaign to build a new adult day care center on Hillsdale Drive. Before making a decision on the funding request, the Board requested that staff review the 1975 Joint Exercise of Power Agreement signed by JABA and the six jurisdictions in Planing District Ten to determine the extent of the County's responsibilities to provide funding for JABA and if that responsibility, as defined by the agreement, is different than that between the County and other non-profit agencies. DISCUSSION: The 1975 Joint Exercise of Power Agreement between JABA and the six jurisdictions in Planning District 10 sets out certain conditions under which JABA, the local governing bodies and the Planning District Commission agree to jointly address the needs and concerns of older persons in Planning District Ten. Several sections of the agreement, which are highlighted below, are pertinent to the funding question for the Adult Day Care Center. Equally important, however, are several other sections of the agreement that pertain to JABA's responsibilities for planning, implementation and evaluation of programs for the elderly and to JABA's responsibilities to the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission. Related to the county's financial obligations to JAB A, Section 6 of the agreement states: The Board shall be supported financially by grants from the Federal government, administered by the Virginia Office on Aging; and by contributions from member jurisdictions. The Board shall request annually of each member governing body an appropriation of funds to cover, in part, costs of regional projects and administration, to be determined according to the ratio of senior citizens (aged 60 and over) in each jurisdiction to the total number of senior citizens in the District. JABA by this agreement is authorized to request an appropriation of funds from the County and the County has a responsibility to contribute. However, the agreement does not stipulate that the county is responsible for anything more than a contribution to JABA's operations, nor is the County required to contribute a specific amount. By the language in this agreement, JABA has a different relationship to the county than other non-profit agencies, because a signed agreement states that JABA will submit a request and that the county will provide a contribution. Other non-profit agencies do not have any such agreement, but simply make an annual request for funds. The County does provide a contribution to JABA through its general program operations budget, althQY&b thp sbaF&jmshistorically been based on a combinati~n of the perc~ntage of the population of persons over 60 and the number .0f:~~~,~+~edVra~er than only the percentage of population as stated 10 the agreement. Albemarle's share of the elderly population 1.$ j¥%:Óut share oì general operations based on population and number served is 10%.' ,: APR-IIII Outside of general program support, contributions to specific programs are addressed in Section 5, Bâþd C: L_,....."..,..._~^'""'"~,...,··..·.......-'---"'" '." ......~....... '., B. a specific project or pass through shall have been approved in writing for implementation throughoo.JJ~~'ijf¿ikiijhÍ" Aging by the two or more member jurisdictions who desire to participate. Since implementation of the project sfiëiiïãpply only to those jurisdictions approving their participation, any additional costs to the Board arising from such projects, and not otherwise compensating for, shall be borne by the jurisdictions involved. · ¡ C. Tht methoã of agreement, the obligations and the local financial participation shall be set forth in the annual proposed budget and ~ scope of work prepared by the Board and authorized specifically by each constituent governing body of each jurisdiction. Beyond the financial responsibilities, specific planning, evaluating and reporting mechanisms outlined for JABA in the original agreement are no longer being carried out, not through fault or non-compliance, but simply due to the passage of time. Revisiting the agreement, it is clear that JABA was strongly linked to the Planning District Commission to develop and coordinate services according to a regional plan that is no longer in place. The lack of an updated comprehensive plan may be part of what often causes the programs and priorities of JABA to be in conflict with the needs and wishes of the jurisdictions. For example, Section 2 states: The Board (Jefferson Area Board for Aging) will function to operate such programs and/or to provide such services as agreed upon by the participating jurisdictions in order to implement the annual Comprehensive Plan for Aging Services of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District, hereinafter referred to as "District". Currently, programs and services are not agreed upon by the jurisdictions, except through the budget process, and there is no annual Comprehensive Plan for Aging Services prepared by JABA or the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission. Section 5 states: The Board shall oversee and be responsible for both the operation of such locally approved regional projects, and the pass through of Federal and State funds as may be consistent with the annual Comprehensive Plan for Aging Services. The Board shall carry out these duties subject to each of the following conditions: A. The project or pass through of funds shall have been reviewed and approved by the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission and its Advisory Council on Aging as being consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan for Aging Services and all other regional plans and policies as they may be relevant. D. projects undertaken by or through the Board shall include arrangements for evaluation by the staff of the Thomas Jefferson Planing District Commission. JABA is responsible for the pass through offederal and state funds that would otherwise come to each locality in the district ($1.7 million in FY 1995-96). Currently no comprehensive plan shows how these funds should be distributed among localities and concern has been raised by both the Program Review Committee and the Social Development Commission about the equity of federal and state funds allocated to regional programs. Again, by default, JABA has been making decisions about the distribution of those funds and programs throughout the region without the input and agreement of the participating jurisdictions These procedures and policies laid out by the Joint Exercise of Power Agreement are brought to the Board's attention to point out that the original agreement needs to be revisited by the localities to determine if these procedures and policies are still valid or if they need to be revised to meet today's needs and priorities. Renewing this agreement would foster a better understanding of program delivery and funding responsibilities between JABA and the six jurisdictions in the Planning District. RECOMMENDATION: Although the Joint Exercise of Power Agreement does not obligate the County to contribute to JABA's programs or facilities, should the Board wish to make a contribution, staff would recommend that any contribution to the Adult Day Care Center be: · on a per capita basis based on the number of County residents over the age of 60 (9162 in the 1990 census.) · spread out over a three year period; · placed in a contingency fund, contingent on matching contributions from the other localities. Based on the clear responsibilities and procedures laid out in the 1975 agreement, staff would recommend that the County take the lead in requesting that the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission convene the six jurisdictions to review and revise, if necessary, the initial agreement in order to clarify the roles and responsibilities of both JABA and the local governing bodies. JABAEX.SAM 95.052 ~ To: ella carey From: Roxanne White Subject: Re: JABA Date: 4/10/95 Time: 4:15p Originated by: Replied by: Forwarded by: ( CHANGED) RWHITE ECAREY RWHITE 4/10/95 4/10/95 4/10/95 3:51p 3:54p 4:15p Yes, I did. Also, the action minutes stated that the PDC was to convene the jurisdictions. I think the Board actually at Sally's recommendation asked the representative members of the Planning District Commission to review it, rather than convening the jurisdictions. *****ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS***** I talked to Estelle and she is preparing a letter now. Don't you mean the Planning District Commission, not Planning Commission. " /\ ~; I.,..' 7 '; AGENDA TITLE: Capital Request - Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center AGENDA DATE: March 1, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: ì 7- ~' .-'1)/. II.;..': ACTION: X INFORMA TION: SUBJECTfPROPOSALlRE UEST: Request from the Jefferson Board for Aging for $100,000 to help construct the Thomas Jefferson Adult ealthcare Center. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMA TION: A TT ACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACT: Tucker, White REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Attached please find a summary letter detailing a request from the Jefferson Board for Aging for $100,000 to help them build a new facility, the Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center, which will be located on Hillsdale Drive in Albemarle County. This request is part of JABA's $2 million dollar capital campaign to raise funds to purchase land and construct an expanded facility for adult health care and other client and family services provided by JABA. DISCUSSION: In response to JABA's attached request, staff has considered the following issues: · The County has historically not been in a position to fund capital requests from non-profit agencies. Funding this request would set a precedent for other non-profit agencies. · Most non-profit capital campaigns have gone to the community and foundations for support, not to a public entity, ie. SHE, Focus, Salvation Army, AID's Support Group. · In the County's role as a provider of operating costs for human service agencies, the County is already supporting individuals using JABA's Adult Day Care Center through scholarships. By supporting services, rather than a building, the County can be assured that taxpayer dollars are being used to assist those who cannot afford the services. Subsidizing the total facility does not assure assistance to those most in need. · JABA's philosophy has been to advocate for more decentralized services, or bringing services to the elderly at scattered sites, rather than attempting to bring rural citizens into a central urban setting. This type of center seems to fly in the face of this philosophy. · The proposal states that the facility will be there for "residents of retirement communities and members of the Senior Center in need of physical, occupational or speech therapy". Is this facility to be used for current Albemarle County residents or will it be used in lieu of services that should be offered at the growing number of retirement facilitie_s coming in to the community? · Since the Center projects serving approximately 50 people annually, the question arises on the substantial taxpayer investment for such a small number of individuals. · Many of the services, ie. games, reading, crans, television, seem duplicative of the services offered by the Senior Center, another new large facility only blocks away. RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend that the County contribute $100,000 to JABA's capital campaign for the reasons stated above. Rather, staff recommends that the County's role continue to be one of targeting and supporting specific programs for current County residents who cannot help themselves and need taxpayer support. A full copy of JABA's proposal is available if Board members wish to review it prior to the meeting. JABAEXEC.sam 95.025 _, I JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING, INC. 2300 Commonwealth Drive, Suite B-1 Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 804-978-3644 1-800-277-5222 FAX 804-978-3643 November 28, 1994 Ms. Roxanne White Assistant County Executive County of Albemarle Office of County Executive 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Va. 22901-4596 Dear Roxanne, Thank you for your recommendation that we include, in addition to the enclosed program review, a letter and proposal for support for JABA's Capital Campaign. We greatly appreciate the opportunity to submit a special request to the County of Albemarle for $100,000 to help JABA construct a new buildinq for its Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center, which will be located on Hillsdale Drive in Albemarle County. About the New Healthcare Center After careful research and planning, the Jefferson Area Board for Aging has decided to launch a $2,000,000 Capital Campaign. These funds will be used to purchase a parcel of land and to construct a state-of-the-art facility that will bring nearly all of JABA's client and family services under one roof. This expanded facility will give adult day care, and other key services, the space they so dearly need, while making them more accessible to the people who need them. Located in Albemarle County near Fashion Square Mall and Route 29 North, the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center (TJAHC) will help fill the growing void of health care and therapeutic recreation services for adults and their families who desire and need a less costly alternative to live-in institutional care, especially citizens of Albemarle County. Crucial Benefits for Albemarle County Residents In the attached proposal, we refer to Planning District Ten (PDX) as the "Charlottesville Area"; and we include key statistics about the future growth of our area's elderly and their risks for institutionalization. It is in Albemarle County, however, that we see the strongest trend of growth among the elderly --- and, correspondingly, both the greatest current use and future need for the healthcare center. Serving Older Citizens and their Families in Charlottesville, Albemarle, Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa and Nelson ..T .. . Page 2 of 4 During the 1980's, the rate of growth of the Albemarle County population was the highest in PDX and twice the national average. As cited on page 9 of the Community Profile, Charlottesville and Albemarle County, February 1994 (Appendix F), "Over the next two decades, the largest increase (in Albemarle) is expected to occur in the 45-64 and 65+ age groups, as the baby boom generation continues to age." At our current Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on East Market Street, we have already begun to see the impact of these population trends in Albemarle County. During our last fiscal year (October 1993 - September 1994), 42% of all TJAHC clients were residents of Albemarle County. Additionally, while all the day care scholarship money for Albemarle residents was being utilized at the end of last year, we entered our current fiscal year with a waiting list of additional low-income Albemarle adults in need of scholarship care. Also, in regards to Albemarle County's use of other JABA services (to be housed in the new Center)... Over the past year, Albemarle County residents demonstrated the highest use of our Case Management and Personal Care and the second highest use of our Home Care and Home Safety Programs --- all of which are crucial services to avoid institutionalization and to protect the well-being of family units. About the Location For the past two years, JABA has searched throughout Charlottesville and Albemarle County for suitable land. In our search, we worked with Charlottesville and Albemarle government officials and the local retirement communities to consider land options under their jurisdiction. We also considered a number of potential properties in the private real estate market. After careful evaluation of all of our options, we have found the Hillsdale Drive location (which is being offered for sale by the Virginia Land Company) to be the most economic location. With its proximity to the most-used corridor in the PDX for shopping, entertainment and work, it is also the most convenient and beneficial location, overall, for access by residents of all of Planning District. In particular, its location in the highest growth area of Albemarle County will make the new Center more convenient to Albemarle residents than its current location near downtown Charlottesville. Its closeness to the Senior Center, Inc., two successful retirement communities (Our Lady of Peace and Branchlands), and such major businesses such as Comdial and GE Fanuc make the Hillsdale location an exceptionally promising one for ready support to the elderly and their caregivers, living and/or working in Albemarle County. . . t . Page 3 of 4 About the Capital Campaign Over the past three years, careful research has gone into assessing the potential success of JABA's first Capital Campaign. In October, 1993, JABA staged a feasibility study to examine the support we could expect from the community for this critical effort. We interviewed 100 key community leaders and potential major donors and received a strong vote of support for building a new, state-of-the-art adult healthcare center. In keeping with sound capital campaign practices, our list of major potential donors contains over 300 names, including the 100 interviewees of the study, all of our current major supporters of the agency, and an additional 200 key potential donors recommended by JABA's Volunteer Leadership. Additionally, during the course of the Campaign (June 1994 - June 1997), JABA will approach its entire list of prior donors, which includes over 3200 individuals, businesses, and other organizations who have invested in the elderly and JABA in the past. In particular, we have established a list of 25 potential major donors (5 individuals, 5 foundations, and 20 businesses) to whom we are planning proposals for between $5000 - $300,000 and whose anticipated gifts total between $699,000 and $1,000,000. The results of the first six months of the first year of the Campaign (June 1994 - November 1994) have been positive. We are pleased to report that we anticipate having approximately $223,833 of the total goal of $2,000,000 in hand by March 31, 1995 (see Appendix G, "Currently Received, Pledged and Pending Gifts"). In particular, we are pleased to report a pending anonymous gift of $425,000 to be received in the second year of the campaign. Plannina for the Future: A Time Sensitive Opportunity As is documented in the attached proposal, the need for the new adult healthcare center is enormous. After exhaustive research, JABA has found an excellent location and is in the process of successful proposals for funding towards the purchase of the land. The greatest portion of the goal, however, is for the construction of the new facility. It is towards the $1,125,000 needed for the "bricks and mortar" of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center that we are requesting Albemarle County's support. We understand that this is an unprecedented proposal from our agency, but we trust that the County will agree that access to a convenient, expanded, "one-stop-shopping" adult healthcare center will be a tremendous benefit to Albemarle residents and to its many employers' working caregivers. . . t . . Page 4 of 4 In 1975, Albemarle County's foresight resulted in its joining with the other jurisdictions of PDX to create the Jefferson Area Board for Aging. Now, twenty years later, another critical trend-setting opportunity to prepare for the future has arisen. The enclosed proposal describes exactly why the new center is needed as soon as possible. However, since statistics and graphs can only tell part of the story, we have also included some anecdotes about two residents of Albemarle County whose lives have been touched by the existing Center. If there are any other materials that you may need in regards to this proposal, we would be happy to provide them. Thank you so much for your consideration and we look forward to hearing from you soon. ¿tifr 'ø Ed J ne Chai n ->-~ tDv!~ y lis B. Hop lnson Vice President for Development enclosures: · Detailed Proposal · Descriptive Profiles of Two Center Participants · Preliminary TJAHC Budget (FY95) · Architectural Renderings of Proposed new TJAHC (with map) · Projected Construction Costs · Map of Future Site · Graph of Albemarle County Population Figures · Report of Current Received, Pledged, Pending Gifts . .' . " .. . . JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING 2300 Commonwealth Drive. Suite B- 1 Charlottesville. Virginia 22901 800-277-5222 804-978- 3644 FAX 804-978-3643 Your Agency on Aging Sen'ing the Citi;::ens of Charlo((es\'ille. Albemarle. FIumnna. Greene, Louisa and Nelson MEMORANDUM TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors FROH: Gordon Walker, CEO RE: JABA Request for Capital Campaign Support DATE: March 1, 1995 ================================================================= First and foremost, I do not believe the issue is whether the adult health care center serves Albemarle County residents well. For seven years, it has provided a safe, reliable alternative to more costly nursing home care for many older persons, younger disabled adults, and their family caregivers. '~hat needs to be discussed is why Albemarle County should be a partner in the successful campaign to build a state-of-the-art center, one this county can be proud to have within its borders. Second, I want to respond to the County Staff report: 1. JABA is not just a nonprofit agency, it is a government entity created by Albemarle County angLother local governments. The county is in a position to help~~Ja other words the means exists, if the will is present to do so. 2. Our capital campaign is going to the community and foundations for 95% of its $2 million goal, the county is being asked for 5%. To date, we have raised close to $750,000 of our $2 million goal. We believe County government is part of the community, and an investment in the adult health care center is an appropriate use of community/public tax dollars. 3. We are grateful for program support from the County; however, the best and most cost-effective use of program revenue is in a building, fully able to maximize support from the County. We are not asking for a subsidy of the total facility, we are Celebrating 19 Years of Community SClTice to the Eldcrh' and flleir Families . Adult Healthcare . Ca\c Management· Ge¡¡alric Con\ultallon · Homc~ound \1cal, · Home Care · Horne Safely'RcpaJr . Inf"rmaIJ(1n and Rè!erral . I.q~;d . Orn~ud'm;'o . Outreach' Pcr\onal Care · Senior Community Cenler\ . SenJ<'r Employment· Telephone Rea\\urance . Tran'porl"tJon . Volunteer Pr(1gr;Jn1\ ., ." ... . , . .. TO: FROM: RE: DATE: PAGE: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Gordon Walker, CEO JABA Request for Capital Campaign Support March 1, 1995 2 requesting partial subsidy, thus allowing to serve more persons in greatest need. 4. True, JABA has advocated for neighborhood programs; however, when it comes to the provision and affordability of adult health care, a county-wide center is necessary. An analogy to this is a high school serving many small neighborhood schools with specialized education because the cost of a high school iþ! every community is prohibitive. 5. The new adult health care center will attract a private pay clientele from local retirement communities and the Senior Center. This marketing of day care is appropriate and necessary since persons able to pay full fare are necessary to enable the center to provide care to the economically disadvantaged and for the center to remain economically viable. The Senior Center and retirement communities do not offer adult day health care services. To believe the residents of retirement communities or members of the Senior Center cannot benefit sign~ficantly from adult day health care (which will allow their ability to remain living at home) is a failure to recognize and understand the different, yet complimentary, purposes and operations of all these facilities. 6. The Center will serve far more than 50 persons. True, daily attendance will be between 50 and 60, however more than 200 individuals will use the Center annually. Further, this number does not include all the family members, particularly working caregivers, who benefit from the Center's services. 7. Again, it is apparent that the County Staff does not fully comprehend the nature of adult day health care activities and how these differ substantially from the services offered by the Senior Center. JABA's adult health care center serves a frailer, more at-risk population than the Senior Center. Again, the analogy drawn from our school system seems appropriate here. To the extent disabled adults can be mainstreamed into senior centers, either JABA's centers or the Senior Center, efforts will be made to do so. However, there are no senior centers with appropriate facilities or staff to care adequately for person living with Alzheimers, stroke, neurological disorders, blindness, etc. And let's remember that providing specialized adult day health care keeps people out of nursing homes while helping families to continue working and caring for their loved ones. . .' .. .. . '" . . . TO: FROM: RE: DATE: PAGE: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors Gordon walker, CEO JAB A Request for Capital Campaign Support March 1, 1995 3 Albemarle County's contribution to our capital campaign will be leveraged to attract national foundation funding. The more local support we can gather, the greater amount of money we can raise elsewhere. Failure to gain public and private support at home will jeopardize national contributions. Albemarle County has the opportunity to be part of a successful campaign, one that helps many current and future taxpayers. As the historian Arnold Toynbee noted, "a community's quality and durability can best be measured by the respect and care given to its elderly citizens." cc: Bob Tucker Roxanne White COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ß -.3/ ~J AGENDA TITLE: Proposed Historic Preservation and Mountain Protection Committees AGENDA DATE: AprilS, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: ?,..:J: ¿! ///, ;;?)?? INFORMATION: ACTION: X SUBJECfIPROPOSAUREOUEST: Request to create a historic preservation committee and a mountain protection committee CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: AITACHMENTS: Yes STAFF CONTACf(S): Messrs. Tucker, Cilimberg, Benish REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Historic preservation and mOWltain protection issues are scheduled to be discussed as part of the Comprehensive Plan Review along with other "Phase 2" topics sometime after August, following the Planning Commission's completion of the land use plan. Staff proposes that the Board of Supervisors create both a historic preservation committee to devise a preservation plan, and a mountain protection committee to devise a mOWltain protection plan for the COWlty. Both plans should include recommendations regarding regulatory ordinances. Staff anticipates work with both committees could begin as early as mid-May, dependent upon progress with the initial land use plan proposals. DISCUSSION: The attached two memos (ATTACHMENTS 1 and 2) describe in more detail the background issues, recommended work programs and recommended composition of the committees. The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its worksession on March 21, 1995, lUlanimously recommended that the Board of Supervisors create a historic preservation committee and a mountain protection committee. They also recommended that a member of the Chamber of Commerce should be added to the mountain protection committee, and that an owner of low land as well as IIlOWltain property should be represented. Two of the Commissioners, William Nitchman and Thomas Jenkins, expressed interest in serving as a liasons on the mountain protection committee. Kat Imhoff expressed interest in serving as a liason on the historic preservation committee. RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that a historic preservation committee of approximately seven members either be selected by staff, or appointed by the Board, with the following areas of representation: 1) and 2) two members with expertise in historic preservation or archaeology; 3) and 4) two owners of Virginia or National Register properties; 5) and 6) two representatives of tourism or preservation-related businesses; 7) a member who served on the Citizens for Albemarle historic ordinance committee. Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that a mountain protection committee of approximately seven members either be selected by staff, or appointed by the Board, with the following areas of representation: 1) and 2) two owners of mountain/low land property; 3) a forestry consultant; 4) a landscape architect or other professional with scenic/resource preservation expertise; 5) a member with expertise in biodiversity or wildlife habitat; 6) a member of the Entrance Corridor Architectual Review Board; 7) a member of the Southwest Mountain Coalition; 8) a member of the Chamber of Commerce. .'H;~^ í7 n \"1 -; \ ~~~ ¡~ ~_.._ij~_... '·1,1 _.....---....-.-- . 9¡~ ';"'-\ 0 In addition, one or more members of the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors may be desirable to act as liasons on the two conunittees. Staff recommends that the Board provide direction on appointing the committees. If the Board would like some recommended names, suggestions can be provided. 95.046 ATTACHMENT 1-A(1) MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Albemarle County Planning Commission David B. Benish, Chief of Community Development Proposed Historic Preservation Committee March 21, 1995 A recent survey of County citizens conducted by the Center for Survey Research (CSR) indicated that 90.5% of the respondents agree the County should have an ordinance for protecting historic sites and buildings. In addition, "preserving historic buildings and places" was ranked 1 Oth in importance out of 25 long term goals for the County. Consequently, the Board of Supervisors has expressed interest in resuming work on a historic district ordinance. Historic preservation issues are scheduled to be discussed as part of the Comprehensive Plan Review along with other "Phase 2" topics sometime after August, following review of the land use plan. In the interim, staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors create a historic preservation committee to devise a preservation plan for the County, which is called for in the Comprehensive Plan and Open Space Plan. The committee can be working on a preservation plan this spring and summer while the Comprehensive Plan Review is proceeding. When the Planning Commission is ready to discuss historic preservation issues, the committee will be able to make a recommendation regarding an ordinance in the context of an overall plan to protect historic resources in the County. Staff recommends an ad hoc committee to address basic questions regarding the future of historic preservation activities in the County. Using an outline of a model community preservation plan trom the Virginia Department of Historic Resources as a guide, staffhas prepared a list of tasks for the committee. If the committee recommends that an ordinance should be adopted, then it is also directed to address what activities should be regulated, and which resources should be protected by the ordinance. With those difficult decisions in hand, staff will be able to prepare a document for the Board's consideration. When the committee has completed its work, it should submit its evaluations and recommendations in written form to the Board of Supervisors. The preservation plan should include further study of, and a recommendation regarding, a regulatory historic district ordinance. There have been several attempts in the past to adopt a historic ordinance. In the most recent attempt, a citizens' group (Citizens for Albemarle) committee presented a historic ordinance proposal to the Board of Supervisors for its consideration on January 8, 1992. The Planning staff was directed to review the proposed ordinance, and the Planning Commission held a worksession on a revised version of the ordinance on October 6, 1992. A recommendation on the ordinance was deferred indefinitely until staff developed a charter for a possible Board-appointed committee to study the issue further. Stafffollowed up with a report in February, 1993, which was not considered by the Commission as the Commission put priority emphasis on other projects. At that time, staff recommended a work program for the Board-appointed committee which specifically addressed implementation of the CF A proposal. Staff is now recommending a more comprehensive work program which will address not only a possible historic ordinance, but also other elements of a preservation plan. Certainly, the valuable ordinance work already done by the CFA committee can be incorporated into this committee's study, so they will not have to repeat that effort. ATTACHMENT 1-A(2) Since that time, staff has obtained cost-share grants for two projects fTom the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. The first project is a historic and archaeological context report for Albemarle County which consolidates all available infonnation on historic and archaeological resources in the County. The consultant is currently revising a draft report, which should be completed in late March. The second project is to have surveyed at reconnaisance level, twelve villages which were not included in a historic sites survey of the County completed by the State in 1983. This project is underway, and is expected to be finished by September, 1995. These two projects are considered essential first steps in pursuit of a historic preservation program for the County. Staff recommends that a committee of approximately seven members either be selected by staff, or appointed by the Board, with the following areas of representation: 1) and 2) two members with expertise in historic preservation or archaeology; 3) and 4) two owners of Virginia or National Register properties; 5) and 6) two representatives of tourism or preservation-related businesses; 7) a member who served on the Citizens for Albemarle historic ordinance committee. In addition, one or more members of the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors would be desirable to act as liasons on the committee. Also, a representative of the County Department of Finance (Real Estate Division) should either be on the committee, or available for questions regarding assessments, tax incentives, etc. While it is anticipated that the committee membership will bring a variety of opinions regarding historic preservation, all members should have an interest in the County's history or historic resources. It is hoped that the committee will be self-directing, with the Division of Community Development providing minimal staff assistance due to the staff time already committed to the Comprehensive Plan Review. Staff requests that the Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Supervisors that they create a historic preservation committee to devise a preservation plan for the County. ATTACHMENT I-B The following is an outline of tasks to be addressed by the committee: I. Devise a Preservation Plan for the County. A. Identification of Local Historic Properties 1. Review the historic and archaeological context report. 2. Review inventory lists of surveyed properties, survey maps, list and map of Register properties, etc. B. Evaluation of Current Trends and Influences on Historic Properties 1. Review the Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives, and strategies. 2. Review and evaluate the adequacy of planning and zoning protection techniques currently in place. 3. Analyze opportunities for preservation; successful examples in our community. 4. Analyze threats to preservation; list properties destroyed and threatened. C. Identification of Tools, Strategies and Action Needed to Achieve Community Goals 1. Evaluate all protection techniques available, including the Virginia and National Registers (individual properties or districts), historic or scenic easements, tax incentives, Comprehensive Plan policy, a regulatory ordinance for historical or archaeological resources, fee acquisition, and other methods. 2. If an ordinance is recommended, identify/priortize what activities it should address. (Examples: demolition only, exterior alterations, landscaping and grading, changes to adjacent properties within the viewshed of the historic resource.) 3. If an ordinance is recommended, identify/priortize which resources it should protect. (Examples: the best representative examples ITom each of the eighteen themes: domestic, religious, commerce, etc., or National Register properties.) 4. Evaluate other preservation activities in which the County should participate, including public education, promotion of voluntary techniques, additional survey, survey maintenance, owner notification program, etc. 5. Define the Monticello viewshed. D. Consensus on Goals and Priorities for Preservation of Historic Properties 1. Confirm the goals, objectives, and strategies related to historic resources in both the Comprehensive Plan and Open Space Plan. 2. Priortize these objectives and strategies, and any others that should be added. 3. Public meetings. ,. ATTACHMENT 2-A MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Albemarle County Planning Commission David B. Benish, Chief of Community Development Proposed Mountain Protection Committee March 21, 1995 The Board of Supervisors has recently expressed interest in starting work on a mountain protection ordinance. Mountain protection is currently included as strategy in the Open Space Plan, and an action agenda item in the Comprehensive Plan, but has never been pursued beyond staff level. Mountain protection is scheduled to be discussed along with other "Phase 2" topics sometime after August, following review of the Land Use Plan. In the interim, staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors create a mountain protection committee to devise a mountain protection plan for the County, including recommendations regarding a mountain protection ordinance. The committee can be working on a plan this spring and summer while the Comprehensive Plan Review is proceeding. When the Planning Commission is ready to discuss mountain protection issues, the committee will be able to make a recommendation regarding an ordinance in the context of an overall plan to protect mountain resources in the County. Staff has prepared a list of tasks for the committee, similar in outline to the work program recommended for the historic preservation committee. If the committee recommends that an ordinance should be adopted, then it is also directed to address what activities should be regulated, and to define the extent of the resources to be protected by the ordinance. With those difficult decisions in hand, staff will be able to prepare a document for the Board's consideration. When the committee has completed its work, it should submit its evaluations and recommendations in written form to the Board of Supervisors. Staff recommends that a committee of approximately eight members either be selected by staff, or appointed by the Board, with the following areas of representation: 1) and 2) two owners of mountain property; 3) a forestry consultant; 4) a landscape architect or other professional with scenic/resource preservation expertise; 5) a member with expertise in biodiversity or wildlife habitat; 6) a member of the Entrance Corridor Architectual Review Board; 7) a member of the Southwest Mountain Coalition. In addition, one or more members of the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors would be desirable to act as liasons on the committee. It is hoped that the committee will be self-directing, with the Division of Community Development providing minimal staff assistance due to the staff time already committed to the Comprehensive Plan Review. Staff requests that the Planning Commission recommend to the Board of Supervisors that they create a mountain protection committee to devise a mountain protection plan for the County. ATTACHMENT 2-B The following is an outline of tasks to be addressed by the committee: I. Devise a Mountain Protection Plan for the County. A. Identification of Mountain Properties 1. Review the Open Space Plan. 2. Review tax maps in mountain areas; computer-generated maps of critical slopes and sensitive soils, etc. B. Evaluation of Current Trends and Influences on Mountain Properties 1. Review the Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives, and strategies. 2. Review and evaluate the adequacy of planning and zoning protection techniques currently in place. 3. Analyze opportunities for protection; successful examples of mountain development in our community. 4. Analyze negative impacts of mountain development; review impacted or threatened properties. C. Identification of Tools, Strategies and Action Needed to Achieve Community Goals 1. Evaluate all protection techniques available, including conservation easements, tax incentives, Comprehensive Plan policy, mandatory cluster development, architectural review, reduction of development rights, fee acquisition, and other methods. 2. If an ordinance is recommended, identify/priortize what activities it should address. (Examples: forestry, residential clearing, new structures, subdivisions.) 3. If an ordinance is recommended, identify/priortize which resources it should protect. (Examples: all areas above a certain contour as defined in the Open Space Plan, areas visible from public roads, environmentally sensitive areas.) 4. Evaluate other mountain protection activities in which the County should participate, including public education, promotion of voluntary techniques, etc. D. Consensus on Goals and Priorities for Protection of Mountain Properties 1. Confirm the goals, objectives, and strategies related to mountain resources in both the Comprehensive Plan and Open Space Plan. 2. Priortize these objectives and strategies, and any others that should be added. 3. Public meetings. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .3' -3/ - yr GENDA TITLE: ail Expansion and Privatization AGENDA DATE: April 5, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: }/f/;/¿/£ ..2~? INFORMATION: X 'SUBJECTIPROPOSAURE UEST: iscussion of Financing Options and Privatization Issues on the Jail Expansion ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: A'ITACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACT: essrs. Tucker, Davis, Ms. White REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Attached for your review are two memos in response to questions raised at the March 15 Board meeting on jail financing and privatization issues. DISCUSSION: The first memo from the County Attorney addresses the advantages and disadvantages of using IDA revenue bonds vs. becoming an authority to issue bonds for the jail expansion, concluding that a jail authority is a cleaner legal process. The second memo from Roger Wiley addresses many of the issues raised by Board members on privatization and answers the following questions: · Either a regional jail board or a regional authority can privatize its jail; · Privatization agreements must be approved by the State Board of Corrections, provide equal quality, and show a cost benefit over a publicly run jail; · A regional jail board must be retained even if a jail is privatized; · The state will participate in the construction of a privatized jail; · No local or regional jails have been contracted in Virginia; · There are no significant operational differences between a jail authority and a regional jail board; · The decision to move forward with the expansion is critical to keep the project on schedule and secure funding from the General Assembly. Gathering infonnation on the privatization of local and regional jails outside the state has been difficult and was hampered this week by several key individuals at the state level being unavailable. Relevant infonnation is also difficult to obtain, due to the dissimilarities between jails privatized outside the state governed by different guidelines and restrictions than those in Virginia. Because privatization has not been tried anywhere in Virginia, it is difficult to measure how successful a privatization effort might be for the the Joint Security Complex. However, privatization issues can be separated at this time from either the decision to proceed with the jail expansion or the decision to become an authority, since as the memo from Mr. Wiley states, privatizing the jail's operations will always be an option to either a jail board or a jail authority. At this time, it seems that much more research needs to be done on privatization efforts elsewhere before any decisions on local privatization can be made. .___~--- (;'~ \-, n If :.' ,,,, ,', - RECOMMENDATION: This data is provided for your infonnation and further direction. Am.w ,~ JAIL3.SAM 95.053 03-30-95 04:51PM POZ Maroh 30, 1995 WILLIAM H. HEFTY ROGER. C. 'WILEY Ai*mI"., ø 1.- - OLD em HA1.L. SUITE ~o 1001 EAsT BIIOt.Þ SnBIT Il1CHMOND, VIJGINIA 2.}2.19 PHONE: 804710-)143 Pf,X: 804 1.2.S-8)S6 HEFfY~ILEY, P .c. FROM: IA.rry W. Davi. Albemarle County Attorney Roger C. Wiley TO: Following the public hearing your county Board held last week on the regional jail proposal you asked that I try to re.pond to several que.tion. raised during that hearing. c~ e1ther the pre..at ";10n&1 Ja11 Boar4 or a req10aal jail authority .at.r into aa .qr....at for privati..tion of the jail" The regional jail privatization statute (Virginia Code II 53.1-71.1 through 53.1-71.6) i- somewhat unclear about thiø question. It confers powers to privatize on "any regional jail authority" constituted pursuant to Article 3.1 or 5 of Chapter 3 of Title 53.1. Article 3.1 contains the enabling statutes for the regional jail authority we are proposing, while Article 5 1s the enabling statute for a board organized in the manner of your current Regional Jail Board. Such boards are of course not "author it i..·, neverthele.s the privatization statute u..s the term "authority" throughout. I believe the intent of the privatization statute i. to permit either type of entity to privatize its jail but the poor drafting of this statute mak.. that 80mewhat uncertain. It is clear, however, that an authority can 40 80. What ar. so.. of the require.ent. for aay privati.atioD p~opo.al" Any privatization ag~eement fo~ a regional jail must be approved by the state Board of Corrections, must prod.uc8 correctional services of at least the same quality as tho.. ~outin.ly provided by the reqional jail facility operated by the public entity, and must demonstrate a cost benefit to the part1cipatinq local jurisdictions when compare4 to the cost of having the public entity o~n and operate the jail. 03-30-95 04:51PM P03 J. ~he~. a D.e« ~o ~.~aiD a ~eqioDal jail board or au~borit, eYeD if the jail i. priva~iled? Yes. The privatization .tatute confer. power. only on the reqional entity, not on the participating cities or counties directly, and not on their local sheriffs. Moreover I 53.1-71.~ requires a re9ional jail authority that issue. a contract to a private operator to retain certain powers and function. including all functions related to calculation of release dates, sentence credit., approval of inmate. tor furlouqh or work release, approving type of work, waqes and credits for work release proqram, classifyinq inmate. and placinq them in more restrictive cu.tody, tran.ferring in.at.s, e.tablishin; rule. of behavior and 4iaeiplininq inmates for rule violations. Clearly the retention of the.. functions would make it necessary for the reqional jail board or authority to retain some staff. woul« the .ta~. participat. finaDcially in the GOD.~ruG~io. &Ad opera~loD of a privati.ed jail OD the .... ba.i. a. ODe op.rate« ~y a jail board o~ authority? The privatization statute (8 53.1-71.6) does permit state reimbur..ment to participating localities for the construction cost. of a privatized jail. It is not clear however exactly how this would be calculated, particularly if the private operator wa. providinq the construction financing at a non-tax exempt interest rate. since no locality has yet used the privatization .tatute there is little quidance about this. In addition, I 53.1-71.6 provide. for the state to reimburse localities for the cost. ot guarding, hou.ing, feeding, clothinq and caring for state prisoners in a privatized facility as long &s the per die. cost per state prisoner does not exceed that ordinarily paid by the commonwealth to a locality on a per prisoner per die. basis. This obligation was made subject to the limits set by the General Ass.mbly in the general Appropriation Act each year. currently, the state do.. not pay the total combined per diem cost for housing its prisoners instead it participates in the fundinq of regional jail salaries through the compensation Board, and then pay. a lower per diem amount to be applied to the incremental cost of housing a state prisoner. In suœmary, althouqh the privatization statute appears to be "kinq an attempt to equalize state funding between privatized regional jail. and publicly operated ones, the different method of calculation and different funding procedure make. it impossible to predict whether the state's participation in a privatized facility would actually be the same. ... aD! 100al or regioDal jail in virqiDia beeD Go.traote. to a priYa~e operator .~ this ti..7 Mo, and we have been unable to learn of any local or regional facility for which a privatization proposal is currently under consideration. Through the virginia Municipal Leaque we 03-30-95 04:51PM P04 have contacted the Virqinia lODDyiat tor the Correc~ions corpo~ation of America (CCA). CCA ia one of the largest private prison operators in the united states and has been negotiating with the state to operate a private facility for .tate prisoners in .outhwe.t virginia. The lODDyis~ advi.ed that although CCA i. not actively engaged in developing any private or regional jail in virginia, the company would be pleaaed to discu.. a privatization proposal with any jail authority that expressed an inter..t. ot~er thaa the power to borrow aonsy are there aDY other .19DifloaDt operatin; differencs. bet.een a regional jail bOar' aD. jal¡ authorityt In reviewing the applicable statutes in preparation of this memo, I found what appears to be a difference in the level of state raimbur..ment tor s.laries. section 53.1-115 provides for the .tate to pay two-thirds of the salaries ot the superintendent and medical personnel of a regional jail operated by a board. While' 53.1-95.19 appears to authorize reimbursement of the salary cost of the superintendent and correctional officers at 100' and medlcal peraonnel at the two-thirds rate. In spite of this apparent difference, I have been advised bI the Compensation Board ~hat they are currently reimbursing aalar e. ~o all regional jails at the same rate, regardless of whether they are governed by a board or an authority. Although I understand the concern that an authority would exerci.. greater operating independence than the current jail board, thereby diminishinq the control exerci.ed by the electeð local government bodies, I am reMain convinced that concern i. more illusory than real. That should especially be true if the current composition of the board is retained for the authority, and if, as W8 have indicated in the draft service agreement, the city council and board of .upervisor. retain the power to approve capital projects. Although the localities forming several of the other regional jail authorities we repre.ent have initially been concerned about loss of control, tho.e concern. have qenerally proven unfounded once the authority has been formed. What ti.e aon.traiDt. aake it Deae..ary to have a quick deai.ion about formatioD of the .~thoritY7 Although the decision whether to form an authority or to use the Industrial Development Authority a. a financing vebicle nee4. to be made, it is the decision whether to proceed with renovation and expansion of the jail that is moat critical at this time. The initial approval received last fall trom the State Board of Corrections was only the first step in securing state contribution to financin; the project. That approval, however, was conditioned on completion of the project by 1998. To meet that completion schedule it ia nec...ary to secure the General Assembly's commitment to the state financing in the 1996-98 03-30-95 04:51PM P05 budget cycle. The state Treasury Board's reque.t for debt .ervice contribution to local and regional jail projects for that 1996-98 biennium must be submitted this tall. Por our project to be included in that request I 53.1-82.3 requires that detailed financial projections be submitted to the Treasury Board by July 1, 1995. To develop the necessary tinancial data by that date the Jail Board or Authority needs to retain a financial consultant very soon. The city and county could authorize the Jail Board to do this but would have to provide the necessary cash. Likewise completion of d.sign and construction by 1998 dictate. that an architect be retained to beqin de.ign work, probably within the next six months. Our other clients have found that it takes at least a year to select an architect and produce a de.1gn that satisfies the Department of Corrections and get the projeot out for bidS. Thus, while 1998 se... a long time away any major delays 1n moving the process forward would threaten our ability to complete the project by the state imposed deadline and thus would jeopardize state funding. While the city and county might have the cash available to pay for the financial consultant that is the most immediate need contracting with an architect will be a much .ore signifioant financial commitment, and one which the localities might prefer to fund through bonds issued by the Authority rather than by using available cash from their re.pective capital improvement funds. Thus even though the most pressinq need i. to approve moving forward with the financial planning and design of the project, the decision about the appropriate financing vehicle needs to follow Boon thereafter. For these reasons I hope your Board will proceed with its decision to form the authority and renew it. request to the City counoil to take similar action and approve moving forward with the jail project. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Board of Supervisors Larry W. Davis, County AttorneV~¿.S2 March 28, 1995 Jail Expansion Financing Two alternatives for financing long term debt for the expansion of the Joint Security Complex have been identified. One alternative is to use either the City of Charlottesville's or the County's Industrial Development Authority ("IDA") to issue revenue bonds. The other alternative is to create a jail authority which can issue revenue bonds. . The Board has inquired whether there are substantial benefits in using one alternative rather than the other. First, I have been assured by bond counsel that both alternatives are viable. I have also confirmed that both alternatives have been recently used by other localities successfully. Second, although there is no way to produce verifiable numbers, bond counsel believes there may be a slightly higher cost to finance the debt through an IDA, however, it is not anticipated to be significantly greater. The major difference between the two alternatives is that a jail authority bond issue is somewhat less complicated. A jail authority would issue bonds secured by the per diem revenue from the City and County, paid under terms provided in the agreement creating the Authority. The Security Complex and the expansion improvements would be owned by the jail authority and the debt would be the jail authority's debt. . An IDA would issue bonds secured by lease payments guaranteed from a lease purchase agreement between the IDA and the City and County. The deal would be structured so that the City and County would deed to the IDA their ownership in the Security Complex (or possibly just the parts to be improved) and then enter into a lease purchase agreement so that the lease payments would pay the IDNs debt service. Upon repayment of the bonds the Security Complex would be deeded back to the City and the Board of Supervisors March 28, 1995 Page 2 County. The lease purchase agreement would include provisions for the County's and City's share of the lease payment to change year to year based upon the daily prisoner numbers of the respective jurisdictions in order to implement the current proposal to share the capital costs. The operating costs would continue to be funded under the existing operating agreement for the Jail Board or a revised operating agreement, if necessary. The IDA financing alternative could complicate future expansions of the jail if such expansions occur before this debt is retired and the future expansions need to be financed by new debt. The complication arises from the fact that the existing facility would already secure the existing debt and could preclude the IDA from issuing the new debt secured by the same property. (This problem could be overcome if the new expansion included the refinancing and payoff of the outstanding bonds.) The IDA alternative could also complicate any future consideration of creating an authority. It would be difficult to substitute parties to the IDA lease because the lease is the security for an outstanding bond issue. (This is only a problem, however, if the jail authority needs to own the jail facility that it would be operating. Typically, such ownership is desirable to protect the City and County from lawsuits arising from the operation of a jail run by a jail authority.) In conclusion, my opinion remains, if all other considerations are equal, that financing debt for a jail expansion through a jail authority is a cleaner legal process than using an industrial development authority. Because there is already an existing jail board which operates in all respects like a jail authority except for its inability to issue debt, there does not appear to be significant governance issues weighing against the legal reorganization of the Jail Board into a jail authority so long as there are appropriate safeguards such as set forth in the draft agreement. These safeguards include the requirement that the City and COllilty both must consent before the jail authority could expand or replace the jailor incur debt to finance such improvements. (See § 3.1 Construction of Jail Improvements in draft Agreement). If any Board member wishes to discuss this matter further or desires additional information, please contact me. LWD:rcs cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive 94-106.004 4 .. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE 3 -3) - ,9S"" EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Board Room Sound System AGENDA DATE: April 5, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: :?5:¿;?'f/d5; øf? / INFORMATION: ACfION: X SUBJECf/PROPOSALIREOUEST: Consider bid to replace the sound system in Room #7. CONSENT AGENDA: ACfION: INFORMATION: STAFF CONTACf(S): Messrs. Tucker, Huff REVIEWED BY: ATTACHMENTS: BACKGROUND: The current P A system in Room 7 was installed in 1981 when the building was renovated as the County Office Building. Demands on the 14 year old system for recording, media tie-ins, and multiple open microphones now exceed the ability of the system to handle the needs. Staffhas sought bids to procure a system that will meet the needs of the public meeting room with the lowest responsive bid being $10,374 from Piedmont Electronics Company of Charlottesville. The system is designed for Board Room settings and would completely replace the existing system. Main features of the new system include microphones designed not to pick up paper shuftling but voice only, the ability to mute the speaker over the head of an open microphone, elimination of feedback due to multiple open microphones, and enhanced amplification and equalization. DISCUSSION: The design of the existing P A system will not allow sufficient volume to be generated without creating feedback in the system. This is especially acute when the room is full during hearings. The new system allows for "presets" to permit the system balance to be changed for varying room conditions. This will also allow for a better tape recording to be generated for the clerk. One of the critical decisions to be made, if the system is purchased, is what type of microphone to use. The new system uses an advanced design microphone which is not offered in the current lapel clip design. The choices are: (1) Lavalier - to be hung around each Board member's neck. (2) A table mounted microphone stand (3) A goose neck mounted stand, much like what is currently on the podium. (4) Low profile, table mounted - may get covered with reading material. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the low bid from Piedmont Electric be accepted with funds to come from Virginia Power electric contract savings ($40,000) in the Staff Services budget. 95.045 .~1995 J.....~>_>.__.._.__ ... \. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE .~M~ I' 1'-, MfR' !:} Iæ) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ~-,.--,."",""--^.~ ;?-3/- ~ AGENDA TITLE: Minor League Baseball AGENDA DATE: April 5, 1995 ACTION: x ITEM NUMBER: ~.§: /,?t7/ß¿::lO INFORMATION: SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: Research of financing alternatives for minor league baseball stadiwn construction CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Hurt: Blank REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: As requested by the Board of Supervisors at its 2/1/95 meeting, stafIhas been investigating fmancing options for minor league baseball facilities. Six regional sites were researched and one university stadium. The localities examined host teams from the lowest level of minor league competition, Rookie League, to the highest level, AAA. Localitv Danville, VA Prince William, VA Winston-Salem, NC Level Rookie A A Localitv Lynchburg, VA Frederick, MD Yale University Richmond, VA Level A A AA AAA DISCUSSION: Financing Of the six regional sites investigated, all were publicly owned and fmanced, while Yale upgraded its facility with University and state economic development monies. The costs and leases vary from location to location, with Danville seemingly having the most favorable lease agreement (see Attachment A). These municipal baseball parks were fmanced with general obligation bonds, CIP funds and loans. Additional research indicated that the majority of sites around the country were also publicly fmanced in this manner-- however, there were exceptions. Several locales funded new stadium construction using a combination of hotel/meals/tourism taxes, cable franchise fees, public donations, state loans, state economic development funds, team ownership contributions and private/corporate sponsorship. The costs for new class A minor league parks ranged from $3-$6 million depending on amenities (see Attachments A&B). These costs do not include yearly maintenance expenses. Most municipalities justify subsidizing minor league baseball as.a means to foster community relations and development. The March 3, 1995 survey entitled, "A Survey of Regional Fan Interest in a Minor League Baseball League Franchise for the Charlottesville/Albemarle Area" supports this conclusion for our area. The study commissioned by the Centerfield Group, Inc. (a potential ownership group) and conducted by the Center for Survey Research at the University of Virginia interviewed over 500 local households. The results indicated that the majority of persons surveyed are interested in obtaining a minor league team for this area, and attendance could be expected to be over 300,000 per season. Also, a substantial portion of residents responded that they were willing to have the local governments help fmance construction of a stadium. " AGENDA TITLE: Minor League Baseball AprilS, 1995 Page 2 Location Finding an acceptable site did not prove too controversial for the regional stadiums recently constructed. These newer stadiums were built either in isolated non-residential areas, or in the case of Frederick, MD near highways with an 11 :00 PM lights out policy. All of the sites researched were utilized for activities other than minor league baseball, such as high school games, concerts and fairs. RECOMMENDATION: Staff research indicates no successful partmnbips for bringing minor league baseball to a community that do not involve the ongoing use of publiclUniversity funds, cith« for debt service or operating costs. At this POint. staff requests whether further research should be undertaken or efforts ended at this time. MINOR 95.044 2: o - I- <t ~ a: o u. 2: - > I- - -J - (.) <t u. -J -J <t m w CJ) <t m w ::J ~ <t w -J a: o 2: - ~ " c:( I- Z w :iii :z: (,,) ~ c:( '1:J c: o E ~~ c: GJ > ca :z: ~~ ~ u .¡: GJ '1:J GJ &tc:( CI ... :3 .Q ~ U c: ~c:( E GJ 'ii en ~c:( E ~ i cLc:( ~ GJ '> :;¡ c: 0 ca 0 Ca: ~ ... ::J « E ::J :.t; C'O ... 00 ~ Ii) ... CI) > c: ::::> > ... ë:3 > ... 1: o ~ ... ::J « ~ ... C'O a.. ~ o > ... .¡: o ~ ... ::J « ~ ... C'O a.. ~ ë:3 ... CI) c: ~ o E :3 :s ca ... (I) '<t OJ en .a ::J Ü .... ~ Z alJ ~ Ii) ... CI) >.a .- :3 c:_ ::::>U o en en E ::J :.t;"C J9ã) (I)¡;= I I I I .a > ::J ... üO .... ,..... M en .a :3 Ü .... c: ;: o c: ~ c: ::::> E ::J :.t;"C C'Oã) t;~ I : .g~ üë:3 It) OJ 0) .... > ... .¡: o ~ ... :3 « ~ ... C'O a.. C") en en .... E :3 "C:.t; C'O ~... _ (I) : : ~.g Oü '1:J CI) c: GJ CI. o E :3 :s ca ... en ... c: ïii :iii E :3 :s ca ... en E .:2 (I) "C"C C'O c: ... 0 OOCC ~~ ... C'O > .~ t) .~ Q) E ~ "C 0 CI) C'O ... > ...- ë: CD"C ::::> g. ïii c: (I) : CI)"C ~~5 It)æCC 0- CI) > >- .91 .'= 6 :ë UNO o alJ CD ~"CC'O 'S ~ g¡ CCC'O"C ~o~ .- CI. CI) U::::>"C c: ;: o c: ~ c: ::::> a.. U : '-..... ~:g-0 M ?'" 0 -01t)- :>"CC: :> c: C'O a.. C'O 0 I .a I en .¡: ~æ-gE ,.....~oo ... CC u ;;:g ..ci >CD::J ~I:::CI.(I) ._ 0 .a CI) UNOalJ>- '1:J GJ U c: ca c: ü: E :3 :s C'O ... en ~ N (I) CI) >- ~ ::J > .a CI) > ... .~ .; o C'O ~ ... ... CI) :3 ... «alJ (I) CI) >- CI) c: o Z (I) CI) >- I > I CD ~ .... ::J C'O .a c: .a C'O ::J ... Ü ~ (I) CI) >- CI) c: o Z (I) CI) >- CI) c: o Z (I) CI) >- CI) c: o Z CI) c: o Z CI) (I) ::::> E :3 :c ca ... en (I) CI) )( o .Q ~ en ... CI) ~ ... o ..r::. ... ::J « E ::J :.t; C'O ... en .a ::J Ü '#. CI) o ~ It)u. > ~õ;: ... 0 .a a. c: .a ::J ... ... ::J ü~.Eü .a .a ::J ::J Ü Ü .a ::J Ü '#. o . It)~ > a.. ~B (I) .a (I) ::J 0 Ü 0 ~ u CI c: :;¡ ... ca a.. .a ::J U .a ::J Ü *.a C") ::J MÜ > 0 ~ ... (I) ¿,:g u 0 ~~ > a.. ~B (I) .a (I) ::J 0 Ü 0 .a ::J Ü c: o Iii (I) CI) u c: c (,,) (I) CI) >- .~ c: ::::> o z ....... (I) CI) >- (I) CI) >- (I) CI) >- (I) CI) >- (I) CI) >- (I) CI) >- '1:J CI) ~ CI) en Õ ~ o u C( .a ::J Ü .a ::J Ü « ....... Z .a ::J Ü .a ::J Ü ~ Z .a ::J Ü CI c: ..- (I) ft U '1:J ca o ... = (I) ... C'O CI) > o c: ;: o c: ~ c: ::::> .... (I) ... C'O CI) > o N alJ ~> 'w ca ... a. CI) CI) .~ ... c: C'O ::::>00 o .... -- (I) ... C'O CI) > It) CI) (I) C'O CI)- ;',2 ~ c: (I) ... C'O CI) > M (I) ... > o C") .!: ... o Z (I) ... C'O CI) > M CI) (I) C'O CI)- ;':2 ~ c: (I) ... C'O CI) > U') CI) (I) C'O CI)- ;':2 ~ .c: (I) ... C'O CI) > o .... .~ g·õ .a ... o 0 O.a c: ::J -6õ 'õ ... >.2 c: o ... ca ... :3 C CI) (I) ca CI) ~ ... "3 ft ..... CD C CI) (I) ca CI) ~ ~ ~>~O oCl)OIt) O.:~~ ..... <.J ...... Q) ... .+:; 0 > (I) ..... 0 ....~** *eo'<t o CD.... .... "'C[ ~U o (I) o~ o a. ooæ .... CI) -0 > ... CI) a. o o o ,..... ... C") :g 0- > ... CI) a. o o o ... It) :g 0- > ... C'O CI) > ... CI) a. .... 0- ... CI) (I)'::: (I) C'O rne* ~ all) õ5alJ *g> CO-0~ ... CI) (I) o."C ::J(I)- _a. ... 0 c: (I) ~ ~ ~ ~ot 0- It) .+:; ... (I) c (,,) CI) (I) ca CI) ~ .. (:la50d ~odOUUO) U! pa~:>o ^uodwo~ 8I!þ:at JO[ow 0 'uouuo:) ~eI.;j Iq pasDlp.nd aJaM >pod aLU o~ ~~Ô!J ÔU!WON 'aJO. S ôS!puoLj~Jaw p.J0 sa~Wo WOa¡ 'saxoq Nnxnl9 apnpU! I!M '9 µdv afDP l.IO!taldwo~ pa¡Jð<::Dg ·Pôuo. SU! aq D!M saw.uawo JaLjtO p.J0 sso15 'steas lP!LjM.Jô.ijO 'Pô.f)Q(j ÔU!8Q f. tualJn::> S! a~aJ:xJO:) (s¡¡odouuc) ) 1..W'V s:µods J\JOUJpa!d UO!II!W Ç$ xOJddo OOl'r wn!POJS UOIJ~ 1SðJ~ S3mlHd lNOL^1031d 'OC>!^Ias S$ô.ijJOM a.npaJ 111M s~as x08 ~p ~-splq~ uapwo:) 0 e.n.paJ 111M p.ooqe.JOC>S 'dµ.¡s po Lj5!4 ,9 x ep!M . çç louq~PPO uo SOL 0Sfv' 'sa5ossaw JOSUOds (: l Al.J0~ II!M SPJOOq uo!S!^iltJOO:f '^v.!Qodo~ fi.o daJ puo e50s -sew '^Dt~P JOIO~ LWM apIM ,99 puo Lj5!Lj ,9\7 ~ 'SJOU!W aLjt ~ . Se5.JO et.U JO euo eq 11M P.JOOqaJO~ 8LU 'SaxOQÍ\> s Ouq~ppo JOJ suqPUI tonbadossoV'J aLjt WO.IJ CXX1CŒ$ AQ Pôtuaw5no SOM ÔU!puìJ Odp!unV'J Piey o~ UMop BuP,IOM puo asJncK>UO~ ~ ~atua SJO~pads Lj~ 'y.\OQ 0 U! pepru.¡suo~ ~aq S! u.ntPOtS 4:>!MJQN )0 ÅJO UO!IJ!W t'OL $ 000'9 "U.Jð~ ppoo SOWOlU 'OOS ~OlV~VN H:)LWlON µods5U1) )0 ÁP.:) lJO!lJ!W ~ $ oœ ~ papf:>ðpun S.!3L^l llIOdSÐND 110M LjÔ!4 fOOJ 9 I uo 'Je. SUOV\J uee~ .!U!W_ 0 sa.Jn.¡OeJ Play -lJa¡ 'seug nOJ ~ JO esnooeg ·uaP.JOô ~ 0 puo saP.îs Anxn 9 epnpu! s8!#ueWV 'SI Å01^J JOJ peuuo d ÔU!uado LWM 'a npet. ~ JO PDel o ~eeM OM+ ÔU!wru ..<.uu€wn:) ~ )0 ÅJO lJO!D!W 0 L $ 000'9 SJ4ðp JO Ð OS 0u!SSfh>S!a S3AlOM V3S 3J~3 'e.JO~ asPLlOLpJaW 0 puo scaD ~!LI:>!d O~ epnpLlI sa~ueWV 's8!.J.! !qodo~ ÂOldal epnPU! n!M pJOOQeJO~ elU 'SJep OLj.¡.oos qrp puo a~ eppow -wo~:>o DIM eA8I Ple!J p e5ulìO epld aLUOLj 'if "Spas qnp JO ~as œ 1000000~PPO LID sn d satf)s laA8 -p a!J OC UIO~UO:> IIlIV\ wn!pO~ Meu aLll Jeqwetdes U! LlO5aq Ñ!POJ Pia aLj~ 1) UO!v./OW8(] 'uot>u!P1::::>0d letad J8UMO SJeddOJl puo ^JP aLjt Aq i,uupf paPLnJ S! ^mpoJ Meu s,uo~LlowP3 '> JOO OQ P/O eLj¡ 1) ev.s eLU UO ttlìQ 5U]eg uoµJOU..p3)O ÁP.::> lJO!D.1W 6$ OOO'OL pappðpun ~3dd~ NOlNOW03 "SeXOQÂ> s ~ I 'SOO.JO :::>!\.qd £; sepn¡:>U! Ñ!PD::J 'CD;' 6 O¡ A¡¡::x::xJo~ 5uuoas asœl~ suo!pas SSOl~ 'S+SO~ \JO!t:ru¡suo~ O¡ pe¡nqUtUO~ no >podnoq p.J0 f4uno:> 'A¡¡:> au AµjpoJ OtLl! tHnq se~wo woe+ 'aJO~ > JodnDg 'fXJ]pas JOLIO!¡PPo JOJ WOOl LWM'SU04D:::> -y!:)ô(js V eldµl O¡ +l!ng 'uo!ß!W 1$ 0+ a:xrCX);$ JOPOSUods e+D.JOC:i.JO~ 0 at ~LjÔµ ÔUJWou l¡as at SUO d ^+p aLll llJD4..InO )0 ÁP.::> lJO!l\!W 61 $ C>Or '9 >JJOd ~ðl4JV suns W04JIïa S1lfW l^J'fH~na )µOd qqo:) A 1 S1 u04DJep!SUO:> Jepun sewou aLjt 5uoWV 'plooqeJO~ UO!5V-iJt ij OÞ' 0 puo 'spas CXXJ'£ f. e+DW!XoXX:Jo JeAO )0010 'OOJo Jlu:::>!d Ñ!~odo~ CSI 0 sa.npaJ >µodlloq au 'ÔU!uedo 01 f!Jd't LID 10) e npaLj~ UO ÅI+uelJn:) 'W61 ~ ¡J!nq f. epAµd SOM LP!L M '>µoduoq P\O aLU)O uow.¡owep eL¡+ 4./!M 01 ~das u05eq l.JO!.PfìJ. SUo:) AµJOO:) ¡g ÅJO lJO!D.1W ~'r$ oos'r pðppðpun S.!3>O'ff N33~Ð VlSnÐnV '>µcd Mau eLU o~~ eAOW II!M ÂMPOJ Pia eLH wolJ pJooqeJO~ eLU 'sa!#Po) epoJoon O¡ WOOl aAOLj I~ M 'sa~uawo 8 o~n MeJ lW,M > JDdnOQ ~!SOQ 0 eq I~ Pla~ uo~D::J 'I eunr ^q ,\pOOl eq O¡ papadxe S! 'se~Jf)()S e~^!Jd puo A¡p 'f4L1no~ 'eJO~ AQ pept.JìJ 'Wî!Po. S et.U 'AJonuOf' a.¡o¡ LI! uo5eq Ñ!poJ Mau aLj+ JO uqptìlJSUO~ puo '9(: .¡snBnv uo e.n.pru.¡s PfO aLj+ 5u!L SIJOWap uo5aq SMel:) 'P1e1j UO~O~ pawou eq e.µs aLj+ uo >µcduoq f,uo P.H sal!nOOl PJD 8LU Pô^!e::>el A1P a.n ueL M peep eL.J.I U! esnop 'if 'e>jDSaWOU puo Josse~apaJd s¡¡ so ep,s ewos eLU 1.JO PJo. S I~ Ple!:l UO:::>IO:I MOO eL.U umqnv)O ÁP.::> lJO!ß!W t"l$ oœ'~ ptaI.;j uo~ ~ N~n9nv '00 µctv ÅQ pat8ldllX)~ eq O¡ pepocbg 'OOJo dlJ\ puo ~!lC!d 0 'SJo+ -opeds louOi-IPpo OOJ£' JOJ SWJeq SSOJ5 'saxoq Junxnl £; apnpu! U!M > JOOIJ08 'I ¡snônV Ll05eq uq.pru. SUo:) uoJðtCkfv)O ÁP.J UO!II!W çl'r$ OOP' ~ l.ll)!POJS SJam.O~ ~3l1.1\têJ ~39~U NOl3lddV ~3NMO 1$0:> AlJ:>VdV:> 3V'NN :>RfVdllV8 l^N3l All:> SÐNIN3dO g66t .ll:lOd38 NOI.lJnl:llSNOJ >t8V'dllV'8 3n8V'31HONIW ¡ewnor ssau!sna J/~asE?fl,{q paJldwm , --- -~-- ---.- S66[ Á.Jonuor - lVNèJnor SS3NIsn8 llV8:Jsvn ,. 8 J,N3WH;)ìiJ,J,V , EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ;3'- .;3/-;95' /5:~/C~ 3ð/ GENDA TITLE: . gh School Bond Referendum AGENDA DATE: April 5, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: ACTION: INFORMATION: X SUBJECTIPROPOSAURE UEST: Staff Report on High School Bond Referendum CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: TAFF CONTACT: . Tucker, Ms. White REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: At the request of the Chairman at the March 20 Board meeting, the following information presents the options and impacts involved in holding a special bond referendum for the new high school. DISCUSSION: Should the Board decide to hold a special election for a Bond referendum for the new high school, there are five basic issues and impacts to consider: 1. Imoact of Delavine Plans to Build the New Hieh School until a Bond Referendum Passes. a. Potential loss of school site since the option to purchase the land will expire in 4 months. b. Delayed construction of the high school by six months resulting in the school opening pushed out to the fall of 1999. State code stipulates a window of at least 90 days between the time the court orders the special election and the date the election is actually held, which includes the requisite time to obtain an Attorney General's opinion on the legality of Albemarle's referendum process. Therefore, even if the Court were to order the special election by the 1st of May, the election could not be held until August 1 at the earliest. Since State Code also stipulates that a special election can not be held within 60 days of a general election, which eliminates the months of September and October, the only time other than November to hold a special election would be August, not a particularly good month for voter participation. The cost to the County of holding a separate special election would be approximately $12,000 - $15,000. The other option is to hold a special election for a bond referendum at the same time as the general election on November 7th. Since the County is already in the process of bidding for an architect, with plans to go out to bid for construction in late 1995 and award a contract in May of 1996, pushing the planning and design phases back until after a November referendum, will also push back the contract award and the actual construction by six months. With this delay, the high school would not be able to open until the fall of 1999. c. Split Billing Revenues deferred until Spring of 1997 (FY 96/97). To be prepared for the first June collection in the split billing process, additional staff, particularly in real estate, must begin July 1 in order to start processing assessment and tax data for a May mailing. To wait until November to begin the process does not allow sufficient time to be prepared by the May deadline, and therefore, split billing revenues could not be collected until the spring of 1997. To proceed with the split billing process and then not utilize it, would incur approximately 6 months of unnecessary personnel costs of approximately $47,000. Additionally, computerization of the collections process for split billing has already begun and will require. approximately 400-500 working hours. At a cost of approximately $8,500 ($17/hr x 500 hrs) to rewrite the system, if split.bi1li~:¡¡eiQU¡~àre not going to be used for the high school, the computerization work should be stopped and redirected back to otlFm:eded county projects. SIi6I J -'2. ImPÌtct of Bond Referendum Passin!!: - Fundin!!: all Hi!!:h School costs with VPSA bonds and no split billinl!. a. Debt senice payment goes over 10% ceiling. If county voters approve the bond referendum and the total costs of the high school are put under VPSA bonds at 7%, the annual debt service costs will go above the 10% ceiling set out in the financial management policies for three years: 1998 at 10.6%. 1999 at 11.2% and 2000 at 10.9%. However, the greatest impact will be the increase in actual dollars for debt service of approximately $3.9 million over a three year period or an additional $1.3 million increase in fiscal years 97/98,98/99 and 99/00. b. Borrowing total amount more costly to the County. Utilizing VPSA bonds for the total high school costs rather than using a combination of split billing and VPSA bonds would cost the county an additional $11 million over the 20-year life of the bond. 3. Impact of the Bond Referendum Passin!!: - Fundin!!: part or all of the Him School costs with General Obli!!:ation Bonds. a. Preparing for General Obligation bonds would delay opening of the high school by one year. To go to the open bond market with General Obligation bonds, rather than using VPSA bonds would require approximately 6 to 9 months of preparation time, 3 months to issue an RFP and contract with a financial advisor and approximately 6 months for them to put together the needed information for the bond prospectus. If this process did not begin until after a November referendum, bond proceeds would not be available in time for the design and engineering phase and, again, the actual construction and occupancy of the high school would be delayed a year. The County could also incur upfront costs of approximately $50,000 to $60,000 to hire a financial advisor, print a prospectus, pay registration fees, etc., although these initial costs could be offset by a lower interest rate than those offered on the VPSA bonds. b. Funding total costs of high school with GO bonds and no split billing revenues puts debt senice level above 10%. If the County decided to use General Obligation bonds for the total cost of the high school and not use split billing revenues, the increase in debt service would be only slightly lower than the increases cited above when borrowing the total amount with VPSA bonds. Debt service levels would still move beyond the 10% ceiling. The savings on potentially lower interest rates for GO bonds could again be offset by the initial upfront costs, as well as ongoing loan maintenance and arbitrage fees. 4. Impact of Bond Referendum Not Passine: - Hi!!:h School will not be Built The consequence of not building a third high school will be that projected enrollments at both Albemarle and Western Albemarle will continue to exceed capacity. 5. Imoact of Bond Referendum Not Passin!!: - Him School Built If plans to build the new high school proceed despite failure of a bond referendum, Albemarle County voters will not only question the purpose of the referendum, but will question the County's decision to go against the expressed wishes of the voters, even if other sources of revenue are available. RECOMMENDATION: This data is provided for your information and further direction. SCHREFER.SAM 95.051 ;, COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3-ß1-?~ ~-:- ¿:7~5; 3'c?:<J AGENDA TITLE: Fire Ordinance and Fee Schedule Amendment AGENDA DATE: April 5, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: ACfION: X INFORMATION: SUBJECf/PROPOSALIREOUEST: Request for resolution of intent to advertise for public hearing to amend and reordain Chapter 9 of the Code of Albemarle, Fire Protection. CONSENT AGENDA: ACfION: INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACflS): Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Trank, Pumphrey REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Staff has been reviewing proposed changes to the fIre protection code for the County for some time to ensure that proper safeguards are in place for such activities as open burning, sale and display of fIreworks, and various inspections required by the state-wide fire prevention code. Legislative changes to the state-wide fIre prevention code are incorporated into this County code amendment as well as expanded ability to provide for fIre lane access and other enforcement and administrative responsibilities of the fIre official. A fee schedule is also proposed to help defray the costs of enforcement and administration of the fIre prevention operations. Although many inspections are required by state law and have been conducted by staff, the County has never had a fee to support such inspections and a fee schedule is recommended by stafIto help defray the cost on a user basis for these inspections. Revenue derived from the proposed fee schedule is anticipated at approximately $20,000 annually. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board pass a Resolution of Intent to advertise for public hearing amendments to Chapter 9 of the Code of Albemarle along with input on the fee schedule as proposed. ~ r~-([UJl.j, I t"''''_ ,~ 95.050 .-+ --'"'~.:..-- , DRAFr ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 9, FIRE PROTECTION, OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 9, Fire Protection, is hereby amended and reordained, as follows: ARTICLE I. In General. Sec. 9-1. Office of the Fire Marshal created: (a) ADDointment (b) Oath of Office (c) Powers of the Fire Marshal and his assistants Relocated to 9 -22. c. BUI:llillg of ~ ef u5e, etc., llea~ § 3 1. Sec. 9-2 buildillg5 alld fellce5. General Drecautions to Drevent sDread of fire. Relocated to 9 -22.1. a Duty to extillg ui51l [i~ e.5 buil L ill opell, liabil';"ty fo~ fo~e5t fi:t:e5. Sec. 9-3. Damaqinq or leoDardizinq DrODertv of another bv fire. § 3 - 3. TIu OWillg ';"IlflaLLL[LLato:t:y obj ect5 f~ Ollt V eLicles . § 3 2. § 9-4. Article II. Fire Prevention Code AdoDtion Applicability of Virqinia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Add Add Sec. 9-4.1 Sec. 9-4.2 Definitions. Local aDDeals. , Add Sec. 9-4.3 Authoritv of Fire Marshal, and his assistants at fire scenes, etc. §~ 9-5, 9 6. Repealed. Add Sec. 9-6 Smoke Detectors in Certain BuildinG (Sec. 5-6.1.) Relocated to FPC. § 9-7. Fire lanes. § 9-8. Fire protection systems. Add Sec. 9-8.1 Fire Hvdrants. § 9-9. § 9-10. § 9-11. § 9-12. § 9-13. § 9-14. § 9-15. § 9-16. § 9-17. § 9-18. § 9-19. § 9-20. Article III. Fireworks Purpose of article. Manufacture, sale, discharge, etc., of certain fireworks prohibited. Article not applicable to certain fireworks. Permits for public displays and sale --Required. Same--Application. Same--Investigation¡ issuance or refusal. Same--Conditions. SalLIe Liability insu:ral!ce o:r bOl!d :requi:red. Liabilitv insurance Relocated to Sec. 9-13.a Same--Nontransferable. Disposal of unused fireworks after public display. Sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain locations. Seizure and destruction of certain fireworks. 2 Article IV. Burning of Brush, etc. Purpose P:recautiollS :requi:red to p:reVellt sp:read of fi:re. Sec. 9-21.1 Definitions § 9-21. § 9-22. ODen burninG ReGulations. LilLlitatioll 011 llou:rs of bUJ::lliIlg betweell Ma:rcll 1 alld May 1:::;. Sec. 9-22.1 Relocate 9-2. Dutv to extinGuish fires built ln ODen: liability for forest fires. Limitation on burning of leaves between October 1 and March 1. Liability for causing forest fires. Old 9-23. ~ 9-22.2. ~ 9-22.3 § 9.23.1. Sec. 9-23. air burninG. § 9 23.2. Sec. 9-23.1 § 9 23.3 § 9-24. § 9-2:::;. § 9-26. § 9 27. Authority of county fire official to restrict ODen Petitions to ban burning in designated areas. Adoptioll of :reg ulatiolls of state ai:r poll utiOll COllt:r 01 boa:rd. Relocated to Sec. 9-22. Violations; penalties. COllSt:r uCtiOll of a:r Licle. Leaf burning prohibited in certain areas. Opell bU:rll';"llg p:rollibited iIl ce.LLaiIl a.Leas. Sec. 9-27. Reserved 3 *Cross references--Buildings generally, Ch. 5; fire districts, § 5-5; authority of fire department officials to direct traffic, § 12-5; fires in parks, § 14-6.3. State law reference--Fire protection generally, Code of Va., Title. 27. ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Sec. 9-1. Office of the Fire Marshal created: aDDointment. oath and Dowers of the Fire Marshal and his deDuties. (a) Pursuant to Section 27-30 of the Code of Virqinia the Office of the County Fire Marshal is hereby established. The Board of SUDervisors shall aDDoint the fire marshal and such assistant fire marshals as the Board deems necessary. Dursuant to Section 27-36 of the Code of Virqinia. (b) The fire marshal and his assistants shall. before enterinq UDon their duties. take an oath. before any officer authorized to administer oaths. to faithfully discharqe the duties of their offices. (Code of Va. Sections 27-37) (c) The fire marshal and his assistants. in addition to such other duties as may be Drescribed by law. shall be authorized to all Dowers qranted Dursuant to Section 27-34.2:1 of the Code of Virqinia. (11-3-1993) Sec. 9-2. General Drecautions to Drevent sDread of fire. Relocated 9-21,22,22(b) (a) It shall be unlawful for any owner or lessee of land to set fire to, or to procure another to set fire to, any woods, brush, logs, leaves, grass, debris or other inflammable material 4 upon such land unless he previously shall have taken all reasonable care and precaution, by having cut and piled the same or carefully cleared around the same, to prevent the spread of such fire to lands other than those owned or leased by him. It shall be unlawful for any employee, aGent. reDresentative or licensee of any such owner or lessee of land to set fire to or to procure another to set fire to any woods, brush, logs, leaves, grass, debris or other inflammable material upon such lands unless he shall have taken similar precautions to prevent the spread of such fire to any other land. (b) During the period beginning March 1 and ending May 15 of each year, even though the precautions required by section 9- 21 have been taken, it shall be unlawful for any person to set fire to, or to procure another to set fire to, any brush, leaves, grass, debris or field containing dry grass or other inflammable material capable of spreading fire, located in or within three hundred (300) feet of any woodland, brushland or field containing dry grass or other flammable material, except between the hours of 4:00 p.m. and 12.00 midnight. (c) The provisions of this section shall not apply to fires which may be set within the corporate limits of any incorporated town, nor to fires set on rights-of-way of railroad companies by their duly authorized employees. Va. Code Section 10.1-1142 (d) Anv Derson violatinG anv Drovisions of this section shall be Guiltv of a Class 3 misdemeanor for each seDarate offense. 5 Sec. 9-3 Damaaina or ieocardizina crocertv of another bv fire. (a) It shall be unlawful and a Class 3 misdemeanor for any Derson to intentionally or neGliGently set any woods or marshes on fire or set to any stubble. brush, straw or other substance caDable of sDreadinG fire on lands, whereby the DrODertv of another is damaGed or Dut in -;eoDardv, and ln addition to any Denaltv which may be imDosed for violation of this section. such Derson shall be liable for the full amount of all eXDenses incurred in fiGhtinG the fire. (b) No person shall throw, toss or drop from a vehicle moving or standing on a highway any lighted smoking material, lighted match, lighted material of any nature or any bomb, device or contraption liable to set fire to inflammable material on the ground while in or near any forest land, brushland or field con- taining inflammable vegetation or trash. Section 10.1-1143 of the Code of Va. (c) Any person violating the provisions of Section 9-3. (b) shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor for each separate offense. (4-13-88) For similar state law, see Code of Va. Section 10.1-1143. Article II. Fire Prevention Code. Sec. 9-4. AdoDtion Applicability of VirGinia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. TIle ~vTi:rginia Statewide Pi:re F:reventioll Code, fi:rouLulgated by tIle state boa:rd of housiüg alld COULlLLU1li ty de \1elOpLLLellt, Pursuant to 6 section 27 - 97 of the Code of Virginia, .sllall cOIlt:rol all LlIat teJ.: S in tLe COUllty cOllceJ.:llillg tLe pJ.:otectioü of life aüd p1.opeJ.: Ly fJ.:olLl tIle 11a2.aJ.:d.s of fiJ.:e oJ.: explo.5ioll, pJ.:ovided, tIlat pUJ.:sU.allt to .sect';'011 2'7 97 of tIle Code of ViJ.:gilâa, tLe boaJ.:d of supeJ.:\Jiso1.s Ilia}' adopt fiLe pJ.:evellti011 l::egulaLioll.s wll';'cll aJ.:e lLLOJ.:e .Lestl.ictive oJ.: hLOJ.:e extell.sive ill .scope than tIle Vi:rgillia Statewide PiJ.:e PJ.:evelltioll Code, pJ.:ovided .sUcll J.:egulat';'oll.5 do !lot affect tIle ILLallller of cOll.structioll, or lllaLe:rial.s to be u..sed ill Llle e1.ecti011, alte:ratioll, :repair o:r u..se, of a buildillg o:r .structU.Le. Å copy of tIle TJi:rgill';'a Statewide Fi:re Prevellt';'oIl Code .sllall be 011 file 111 tIle office of tLe f';'re off';'cial. (4-13 88) the VirGinia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is adoDted by the County of Albemarle. exceDt as otherwise modified or amended ln this article. and the same is hereby incorDorated fully by reference. This code shall be referred to in this chaDter as the "fire Drevention code". The Fire Rescue Division shall enforce the fire Drevention code under the direction of the fire official. Sec.s. 9 :::;, 9 6. Repealed b}' ordillallce adopted 4 13 - 88. Sec. 9-4.1 Definitions. The followinG words and terms used in the fire Drevention code shall have the definitions ascribed to them in this section: Fire official shall mean the Fire Marshal and/or his assistants. Jurisdiction shall mean the Countv of Albemarle. VirGinia. 7 Leaal counsel of the iurisdiction shall mean the county attorney or an attorney appointed by the board of supervisors to represent the county in leqal matters. Sec. 9-4.2 Local aDDeals. Appeals concerninq the application of the Fire Prevention Code by the local enforcinq aqency shall be qoverned as follows: (a) The Albemarle County Buildinq Code and Appeals Board is hereby constituted as. and shall serve as the Albemarle County Fire Prevention Code Appeals Board. (b) The chairman and secretary of the Albemarle County Buildinq Code and Appeals Board shall serve in that same capacity for the Albemarle County Fire Prevention Appeals Board. (c) The fire official shall provide clerical support to the board within personnel and budqetinq limits. (d) Appeals to the board may be made by any person aqqrieved by any decision or interpretation of the fire official made under the provisions of the code. (e) Pursuant to Virqinia Code Section 27-98. the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County hereby adopts a fee schedule in order to defray the costs of enforcement and appeals. This schedule may be revised from time to time by action of the board of supervisors. Sec. 9-4.3 Authoritv of Fire Marshal or his assistants at fires, etc. Relocated from 12-5. (a) Whenever any fire occurs in the county. it shall be the duty of such Fire Marshal or his desiqnated representative to be 8 Dresent at the same and advise and act in concert with such officers of Dolice as may be Dresent: and. for DreservinG order at and durinG the existence of such fire. and for the Drotection of DrODertv. he shall have concurrent Dowers with the officers of Dolice. and the chief or their officer in charGe. but shall not exercise any authority which will conflict with the Dowers of any chief or other officer in command of any fire comDany in the discharGe of his sDecial duties as such. In addition. the Fire Marshall and his assistants shall have all Dolice and other Dowers of fire marshals as set forth in the Code of Va. Section 27-34.2:1. (b) The Fire Marshal or his assistants shall disDlay his firefiGhter badGe. Any Derson at a fire refusinG or neGlectinG to obey the orders of the Fire Marshal or his assistants shall. UDon conviction thereof. be sublect to a fine not to exceed S100.00 (Code of Va. Section 27-19) . Sec. 9-6 Smoke detectors in certain buildinas. Relocated Sec. (5-6.1.) Pursuant to Section 15.1-29.9 of the Code of VirGinia. there shall be installed smoke detectors in the following structures or buildings: (a) Any building containing four or more dwelling units; (b) Any hotel or motel regularly used, offered for or intended to be used to provide overnight sleeping accommodations for one or more persons; and 9 (c) Rooming houses regularly used, offered for or intended to be used to provide overnight sleeping accommodations. (d) SLLLoke detecto:rs iustalled pu:rsuaut to tIâs secLioll sllall be installed ill cOl1fo:rlL,al1ce witL tIle P.LOviS';"011S of tIle Ullifo:rLLl Statewide Buildillg Code. Any SUcll slLLoke detecto:r ILLay be ei tIle.L battery ope:rated o:r AC powe.Led. TIle OWl1e.L of eacll Ullit wLicll is :rel1ted o:r leased, at Llle beg';"lŒlillg of eacll tel1al1cy and at least al1l1uall1' tIle:reafte:r, sLal1 funlisL tIle tenant witll a ce:r Lificate that all :requi.Led sILLok.e detecto:rs a:re p:resel1t, llave beel1 illspected aud a:re ill good wo:rkiilg o:rde:r. ExcepL fo:r sLLLoke detectoJ:: s located 111 hallway s, staiJ:: wells alld otLe~ fiubl';"c OJ:: COLLLLLL011 aJ::eas of ILLul tifaILLily buildillgs, illteJ:: ilLL testing, :r epair al1d llLaillteIlal1ce of sLuoke de LectoJ:: s ill :r ellted oJ:: leased uili ts sllall be tIle :respollsibility of tIle tellt, 110weveJ::, tLe OwlleJ:: sLall be obligated to se:rvice, repai:r OJ:: replace allY LLLalfUllctiOlâl1g sIL,oke detectoJ::s witLill five days of :receipt of wJ:::Lttell llotice f:rolu tLe tel1ant tIlat sucll sLLLoke detecto:r is ill 11eed of ser v 1ce, :r epail. OJ:: J:: eplacelllellt . (e) AllY bu.ildillg cOlltaillillg feweJ:: tIlan [ouJ:: dwellillg Ulâts wllicll was 110t ill cOIL(pliallce witll the p:recedillg pa.LagJ::apL of tIâs section 011 July 1, 1304, sllâ.11 be exelLLpted f.LOIL, tIle J::equiJ:: elLLel1ts of tllis sectiou Ulltil sucL tiLLLe as tllâ.t bu';"ldillg or allY dwellillg Ullit tIleJ::ein is sold o:r J::ellted to al10tLe:r pe~soll. (12 9 01,4 13 -8-8-:-7- Sec. 9-7. Fire lanes. 10 (a) The fire official may require both public and private fire lanes, as deemed necessary for the efficiency and use of fire and rescue apparatus. Fire lanes shall have a minimum width of 18 feet. (b) Designated fire lanes shall be free of obstructions, vehicles and marked in a manner prescribed by the fire official. (c) All desiGnated fire lane siGns or markinGs shall be maintained in a clear and leGible condition at all times and reDlaced when necessary to ensure adeauate visibility. (d) The County Police and the Fire Marshal's office shall have concurrent lurisdiction to enforce the Drovisions of this section. Sec. 9 7.1 Fire Hvdrants and Fire deDartment connections. (a) It shall be unlawful for anyone to block. hide or otherwise obstruct by fences. bushes. trees. walls or any other oblect. in any manner any fire deDartment connection or fire hydrant. (b) No oblect shall be Dlanted. erected or Darked within fifteen feet of any fire hydrant or fire deDartment connection. (c) The County Police and the Fire Marshal's office shall have concurrent lurisdiction to enforce the Drovisions of this section. Sec. 9-7.2 Fire Hvdrants: Placement of: 11 The followina sections shall aDDly to all new buildinas which are located within the Countv Service Authority areas: (a) One fire Hydrant shall be located within 50 feet of any sDrinkler or standDiDe connection on any new buildinas eauiDDed with such devices within the County. (b) The maximum distance. by use arOUD. from the hydrant to the most remote Dart of the structure the hydrant will serve shall not exceed the followina: Assembly. Business. Mercantile 350 Feet Educational. Institutional 300 Feet Industrial. Factorv. Storaae. and Hiah Hazard 250 Feet Residential. R-1 thru R-3 Residential. R-4 250 feet 500 feet How aDDlied: All structures eauiDDed throuahout with an Automatic sDrinkler system or a standDiDe system shall have the first hydrant located within 50 feet of the fire deDartments connection and those distances stated by use arOUD. in section (b) shall aDDly to the next closes hydrant. (c) All hydrants shall be a minimum of 25 feet away from any buildina or structure and so located to be visible from the nearest travelway from which fire eauiDment will use to aain access. Sec. 9-7.3 Fire Flows 12 (a) The sUDDlv systems which serve any hydrant listed in section 9-7.2 shall be caDable of deliverinG not less than the followinG fire flows with a residual Dressure of not less than 20 Dounds Der square inch to at least one location. These fire flows shall be in addition to the Deak domestic and commercial demands. In those cases where the source of sUDDlv cannot deliver fire flow at adequate Dressures. such measures (DumDs. tanks or both) shall be taken bv the owner to Drovide the required flows. Residential R-4: Distance between Sinale Hvdrant Two Hvdrants Buildinas Flow Reauired Combined Flow 31 Ft. & Greater 1.000 GPM 1. 000 GPM 11 Ft. to 30 Ft. 1.000 GPM 1.500 GPM 10 Ft. or Less 1.500 GPM 2.000 GPM Residential Rl thru R-3. Assemblv. Business. Educational. Institutional: 1 - 3 Stories Over 3 Stories Mercantile. Factorv. Industrial. StoraGe 2.000 GPM 2.500 GPM and HiGh Hazard: Central Well Systems: Note: 1. In areas of mixed use. the hiGher fire flow shall Govern. 2.500 GPM 30.000 Gallons StoraGe 13 2. Where the size and SCODe of the develoDment exceeds these reauirements. flows shall be Drovided in accordance with ISO (Insurance Services Office) reauirements. Sec. 9-8. Fire protection systems. (a) Any person or persons engaged in selling, servicing, testing, leasing, installing, inspecting, altering, modifying, repairing or removing any portable or fixed fire protection, suppression or detection equipment and systems in the county shall be registered with and operated from a permit issued by the fire official. (b) Each registrant will provide the fire official with proof of adequate general liability insurance, including product or completed operations liability insurance, which will protect the public (both from property damage and personal injury) from negligence of their personnel performing the aforementioned activities considering the nature and extent of the registrant's proposed activities. (c) Any person or persons engaged in the aforementioned activities shall demonstrate proof of qualification, in a manner prescribed by the fire official. Supp. No. 23, 4-88 (d) All servicing, inspection, testing, installing, altering, modifying, repairing, or removing of such equipment and systems, shall be done in accordance with the practices, standards, codes and requirements of the National Fire Protection Association, the Statewide Fire Prevention Code and Virginia 14 Uniform Statewide Building Code and the orders of the Fire Official. (e) Failure to comply with this section shall be cause for revocation of the permit and shall be a violation of the Statewide Fire Prevention Code. (3-20-75; 4-13-88) Article III. Fireworks. For state law as to fireworks generally, see Code of Va., Sections 59.1-142 to 59.1-148. Sec. 9-9. Purpose of article. The purpose of this article is to provide administrative procedures for the regulation of the use and sale of fireworks. Sec. 9-10. Manufacture, sale, discharge, etc., of certain fireworks prohibited. Except as otherwise provided in this article, it shall be unlawful for any person to transport, manufacture, store, sell, offer for sale, expose for sale, buy, use, ignite or explode any firecracker, torpedo, skyrocket or other substance or thing, of whatever form or construction, that contains any explosive or inflammable compound or substance, and is intended, or commonly known, as fireworks, and which explodes, rises into the air or travels laterally, or fires projectiles into the air, other than sparks, and other than those fireworks excepted under the provisions of section 9-11. (Code 1967, § 10-4; 4-13-88) 15 For state law basis of this section, see Code of Va., Section 59.1-142. Sec. 9-11. Article not applicable to certain fireworks. The provisions of tLis article section 9-10 shall not apply to sparklers, fountains, Pharaoh's serpents, caps for pistols or pinwheels, commonly known as whirligigs or spinning jennies, when used or exploded on private property with the consent of the owner of such property; nor shall the provisions of this article apply to the use of fireworks by any railroad company for signal purposes or illumination; nor shall the provisions of this article apply to the sale or use of blank cartridges for a show or theater or for signal or ceremonial purposes in athletics or sports or for use by military organizations. (Code 1967, § 10-5) For state law basis of this section, see Code of Va., Sections 59.1-146, 59.1-147. Sec. 9-12. Permits for public displays or sale --Required. (a) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this article, public displays of fireworks may be given by fair associations, amusement parks or by any organization or group of individuals in accordance with a permit from the fire official. It shall be unlawful for any person to hold, present or give any such public display of fireworks without first having obtained such a permit from the fire official. 16 (b) It shall be unlawful for any Derson. firm. corporation. oraanization or arOUD of individuals to tranSDort. manufacture. store. sell. offer for sale. or eXDose for sale any Class C fireworks termed leaal under section 9-11 of the County Code without first obtainina a Dermit to do so. (Code of Va. 59.1-148) (Code 1967, § 10-6; 4-13-88) For state law as to authority to county to adopt this section, see Code of Va., Section 59.1-144. Sec. 9-13. Same--Application. Any person desiring a permit required by section 9-12 shall make application therefor to the fire official at least thirty days prior to the date of such sale or fi~~wo~k5 display. Such application shall be on forms provided by the fire official. The applicant shall furnish the following SttCh information as Lllay be :r:equi:r:ed by tl!~ fi:r:e official. at time of application; (a) Ead! pe~lllittee Ul!d~~ tl!i5 a:r:ticle sl!all fil~ witL tLe fi:r:e official al!d a licel!s~d Íl!su:r:al!c~ cOlLípal!y ~\1idel!ce of A policy of liability insurance, certificate of insurance or a bond in an amount deemed adequate by the fire official al!d licel!5ed Íl!su:r:al!ce cOILlpal!y for the payment of all damages which may be caused either to persons or to property for both sinale or multiDle occurrences. by reason of the permitted display or sale and arising from any acts of the permittee or his agents, employees or subcontractors. 17 (b) A sianed statement of intent from the landowner aivina his Dermission to use his land for the Dublic or Drivate disDlav or sale of fireworks. (c) A Dlan showina the location of the stand or disDlay and all distances from any adloinina buildinas. DrODerty lines. roadways. utility lines and if a outdoor disDlay. all reauired Dublic SDectator lines in conformance with NFiPA 1123. ChaDter 3. Table 3-1.3. (d) All outdoor disDlavs shall conform to the reauirements of NFiPA 1123 titled Outdoor DisDlav of Fireworks. (Code 1967, § 10-7; 4-13-88) (Code 1967, § 10-10; 4-13-88) Sec. 9-14. Same--Investigation; issuance or refusal. Upon filing of an application for a permit required by section 9-12, the fire official shall make an investigation to determine whether the applicant is properly qualified to present a public fireworks display and whether such display can be held without danger to property or person. If the fire official is satisfied with the results of such investigation, he shall issue the permit. If he is not satisfied with the results of such investigation, he shall refuse to issue such permit. (Code 1967, § 10-8; 4-13-88) Sec. 9-15. Same--Conditions. (a) The fire official may specify, in any permit issued pursuant to section 9-12, any conditions which he shall deem necessary to protect persons and property. Such conditions may include, but shall not be limited to, the type of fireworks sold 18 or to be used, 111 such display, the hours when such display may be presented, required fire extinguishing equipment, the Dostinq of no smokinq siqns. the presence of trained firemen and policemen and any other requirement that the fire official may deem necessary. (Code 1967, § 10-9: 4-13-88) (b) Pursuant to Section 27-97 of the Code of Virqinia. Drlor to Januarv 31 of each Year. each wholesaler wishinq to sell Class C fireworks within the county shall contact the Fire Rescue Division and Drovide it with a inventory list. statinq name and stock number of all fireworks items such wholesaler wishes to offer for sale within the County. No later than March 31 of each year or such other date as the fire official shall Drescribe. each wholesaler shall submit for testinq 5 samDles of each item listed on their inventory list for testinq. After testinq is comDleted an aDDroved list for each wholesaler shall be comDiled and sent back to the wholesaler. (c) Pursuant to the Fire Prevention Code. fireworks items sold bv these comDanies in the county shall be confined to this list. Anv item offered for sale. not aDDearinq on the list shall be deemed as a violation of this code section and the violator(s) shall be Quilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Sec. 9-16. reserved Sec. 3 16. SalLle Liability il1Stl:ra11ce o:r b011d :required. Relocated to Section 9-13.a. Sec. 9-17. Same--Nontransferable. 19 No permit issued pursuant to section 9-12 shall be transferable. (Code 1967, § 10-11) Sec. 9-18. Disposal of unused fireworks after public display. Any fireworks remaining unfired at the end of any public display shall be immediately disposed of in a way safe for that particular type of fireworks. (Code 1967, § 10-12) Sec. 9-19. Sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain locations. No peL SOIl sllall sell, offeL fOJ:: sale, stOJ:: e, display OJ:: discllaJ::ge auy fiLewoJ::ks ill an}! filling station OJ:: 011 allY pJ::eLLlisês wlleJ::e gasoline OJ:: oLlleJ:: inflaLlaLLable liquids aLe stoJ::ed OJ:: dispeld;ed. No Derson shall sell. offer for sale. store. disDlay or discharqe any fireworks outside any qasoline station or other Dremises where qasoline or other inflammable liquids are stored or disDensed. nor shall any Derson sell. offer for sale. store. disDlay or discharqe any fireworks from anv outdoor stand or other temDOrary or Dermanent structure which is located outside any qasoline station or other Dremises where qasoline or other inflammable liquids are stored or disDensed. In addition. no Derson shall sell. offer for sale. store. display or discharge any fireworks within fiftv (50) feet of any qasoline station or other Dremises where qasoline or other inflammable liquids are stored or disDensed. or within fifty (50) feet of any outdoor 20 stand or other temDorarv or Dermanent structure which is located outside any Gasoline station or other Dremises where Gasoline or other inflammable liauids are stored or disDensed. (Code 1967, § 10-13) Sec. 9-20. Seizure and destruction of certain fireworks. Any law enforcement officer arresting any person for the violation of any provision of this article shall seize any article mentioned in section 9-10 which is in the possession of or under the control of the person so arrested, and shall hold the same until final disposition of any criminal proceedings against such person. If a judgment of conviction is entered against such persons, the court shall, in addition to any other penalty imposed, order destruction of such articles upon expiration of the time allowed for appeal of such judgment of conviction. (Code 1967, § 10-14) For state law basis of this section, see Code of Va., Section 59.1-143. Article IV. Burning of Brush, etc. Sec. 9-21. PurDose. The DurDose of this article is to Drotect the Dublic health, safety and welfare bv reGulatinG ODen fires within the county to achieve and maintain. to the Greatest deGree Dracticable. levels of air aualitv that will Drovide comfort and convenience to the DeoDle of the county while DromotinG economic and social develoDment. The reGulations Drovided herein are intended to 21 sUDDlement the aDDlicable requlations Dromulqated bv the DeDartment of Air Pollution Control and Section 10.1-1142 of the Code of Virqinia and all other aDDlicable laws. Sec. 9-21.1 Definitions. For the DurDoses of this article. the followinG words and Dhrases shall have the meaninqs resDectivelv ascribed to them by this section: Debris waste means stumDS. wood. brush. leaves and the like resultinG from land clearinq oDerations. For the DurDoses of this article debris waste shall not mean leaves and tree. yard and Garden trimminqs located on and qenerated from the Dremises of a Drivate residence. Fire marshal means the Albemarle Count v Fire Marshal or his assistants. aDen burnina means the burninG of any matter in such a manner that the Droducts resultinG from combustion are emitted directly into the atmosDhere without first Dassinq throuGh a stack. duct or chimney. ODen Dit incineration is a form of ODen burninG. aDen Dit incinerator means a device used to burn waste for the Drimarv DurDose of reducinG the volume bv removinq combustible matter. Such devices function bv directinq a curtain of air at an anGle across the tOD of a trench or similarly enclosed SDace. thus reducinG the amount of combustion bv Droducts emitted into the atmosDhere. The term also includes 22 trench burner. air curtain destructors and over draft incinerators. Bonfire/Recreational burnina meaninq anv outdoor fire which is used to cook food for human consumDtion or ceremonial DurDoses which shall not exceed five feet by five feet by five feet In dimension nor burn lonqer then three hours in duration. Yard debris meaninq leaves. trees. yard and qarden trimminqs located on and qenerated from the Dremises. Household debris meaninq matter such as DaDer baqs. boxes and wood oriqinatinq and qenerated from the home which is accumulated in the course of ordinary day-to-day livinq. Excluded are those materials listed under refuse in any form. Refuse meaninq any trash. rubbish. qarbaqe and other forms of solid or liquid waste includinq but not limited to. wastes resultinq from residential. commercial. industrial. institutional. trade. construction oDeration. such as tires. rubber. Dlastics. asbestos. imDreqnated woods. Dlywood. sheetrock. qlass. wire. shinqles. sidinqs. metals or emDty containers of such materials as Daints. coatinqs. solvents and sealants. Sec. 9-22 relocated to 9 2.b Sec. 9-22. ODen Burnina Reaulations. (a) The Commonwealth of Virqinia State Air Pollution Control Board Requlations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution. Part IV. Emissions Standards for ODen Burninq (Rule 4-40). as amended Auqust 1.1992 and aDDlicable to the countv. are herebv adoDted and incorDorated bv reference: Drovided. however. in the 23 event that County reaulations imDose more strinaent reauirements than reaulations issued by the State Air Pollution Control Board, County reaulations shall aovern. Anv Dermits reauired by such state reaulations may be issued by the countv. if authorized by the state aaency otherwise resDonsible. Sec. 9 23.3. Adoption of :regulatiOl!.s of .state ai:r pollutiol! cOl!t:rol boa:rd. (a) Subject to the fo:regoil!g, tl!e:re a:re I!e:reby adopted by :refe:rel!ce tl!e :regulatiOl!.s of the State Ai:r PollutiOl! COl!t:rol Boa:rd conce:rl!';"I!g open bu:rl!il!g, cOl!.si.stil!g of a po:rtiol! of 5ect:i..ol! I, .sectiOl! 120 02-11 al!d .sect';"Ol!.s 120 04-4001 to 120 04-400:::; (Rule 4 40) of tLe RegulatiOl!.s fo:r tl!e COut:rol al!d Abatelllel!t o[ Ai:r Pollutiol! of tLe .said boa:rd, a.s .set fo:r tl! il! a publicatiol! o[ tl!e .sa';"d boa:rd el!titled "Regulation.s COl!cel:l!il!g Open BUl:l!il!g," as the .sallie [llay be alllel!ded by the .said boa:rd f:rolll tiiLLe Lo tiLlIe. All :refe:rel!ce.s ill tl!e .said :regulatiol!.s to tLe .said boa:rd .shall be COl!.st:r ued to apply, LlIutati.s lILutand';".s, to tl!e couüty I!e:r eUl!de:r . Po:r .state la~ .siiLlila:r to p:rov i.s';"OI!.s of Ll!i.s a.L ticle, .see Code of Va., § 10 62. Relocated from Sec.9-1 Sec. 9 21 BUl:l!il!g o[ deb:r';".s :re[u.se, etc., I!ea:r buildil!g.s al!d fel!ce.s. (b) No person shall at any time burn any refuse. rubbish, trash, garbage or other form of waste materials in the county. (0) No Derson shall burn yard debris or household debris within three hundred feet of another's residence, garage, stable, 24 outhouse or fence made of inflammable materials, unless such debris are :rubbish, t:rasL, ga:rbage o:r otLe:r waste LL,ate:rial 1S confined in a closed container of galvanized iron or other fire- proof material, or in an open container attended by an able bodied person until the embers therein contained are burned out or the burning embers are extinguished. Cd) During the period May 16 to September 30, all open burning of leaves and debris shall be subject to the regulations of the Sec. 9-22. a of this article. State Ai:r pollutiOIl COIlt:rol Boa:rd. (e) Any person violating this section shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor. This sectioll does 110t apply to leaf bUI:llil1g as pe:rlL,i t led Ullde:r sectioll 3 22.1. (Code 1967, § 10 1, 9 1::; 02) Relocated from Sec. 9-2 Sec. 9-22.1 Dutv to extinquish fires built in ODen: liability for forest fires. (a) Any person who shall build a fire in the open air or use a fire built by another in the open air, within one hundred fifty (150) feet of any woodland, brushland or field containing dry grass or other inflammable material, shall, before leaving such fire unattended, totally extinguish it. (b) Whenever it shall be established that a forest fire originated from any such fire, the person building or using such fire, in addition to any other penalty imposed for the violation 25 of this section, shall be liable for the full amount of all costs incurred in suppressing the fire. (c) Any person violating the provision of this section shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor. (Code 1967) State law reference--For similar state law, see Section 10.1-1142 of the Code of Virginia. Sec. 9-22.2 Limitation on burning of leaves between October 1 and March 1. In addition to those reGulations found in Section 9-22. (a) (b). and (c). the disposal, by open burning, of leaves originating on private property and burned on those premises shall be lawful during the period October 1 to March 1; provided, that: (a) No fire is built within twenty-five (25) feet of any structure, within five feet of an adjoining property line, nor on any highway right-of-way; (b) Such burning is done between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. and all embers are totally extinguished at the end of this period; (c) Only leaves are burned and they are dry enough to burn without smoldering; (d) The leaves are burned in reasonably small piles so as to minimize smoke and danger from fire getting out of control; (e) The fire is attended at all times; 26 (f) No flammable liquid or combustible solids, other than leaves, are used in the fire; (g) Water and tools for control of the fire are available and on hand at the site of the fire. (10-1-75; 4-21-76) Sec. 9-22.3 Liabilitv of burninq. If any forest fire shall originate as a result of the violation by any person of any provision of this article, such person shall, in addition to any other penalty imposed for such violation be liable to the state and to the county for the full amount of all expenses incurred by the state and the county respectively in suppressing such fire, such amounts to be recoverable by action brought by the state forester in the name of the Commonwealth on behalf of the Commonwealth and by the countv attorney boa~d of 5upe~vi50~5 on behalf of the county. Every person who shall burn leaves as permitted by this article shall do so at his own risk and shall be liable for damage caused by any fire which escapes or gets out of control. Sec. 9-22.4 Anv Derson violatinG this section shall be Guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor. for each seDarate offense. See VirGinia Code Section 10.1-1143(D). Sec. 3-23. Relocated to Section 9-22.3 Sec. 3 23.1. Sec. 9-23. Authority of county fire official to restrict oDen air burninq. 27 (a) The county Fire Marshal or his assistants shall have authority to suspend, Drohibit or reauire sDecial conditions thIs a:rtlcle al!d ban reaardina all open burning during times of excessive drought, or dry spells, o:r fo:r :reaSOI!5 of prevailing atmospheric conditions or whenever the location of the burn site would reauire sDecial Drovisions to Drevent the burnina from becomina offensive or oblectionable. (b) ~ notice of violation or such suspension shall be issued to the Derson doina the burnina or. if countywide. communicated promptly to all local radio and television stations and daily newspapers. (10-1-75¡ 4-21-76¡ 4-13-88) Sec. 9 :23.2. Sec. 9-23.1 petitions to ban burning in designated areas. (a) The residents of any subdivision or other clearly defined area in the county may petition the board of supervisors to enact supplementary ordinances banning all open burning of leaves or all ODen air burnina in aeneral. in such area. (b) TLe :residel!ts of any subdivisiOl! o:r othe:r clea:rly def';'ued a:r ea il! tl!e county lllal1 peti tiOI! the boa:rd of supe:r tJ iso:r 5 to el!act supplel11el!ta:ry o:rdil!aùces bauüing all open bUJ::l!il!g il! such a:rea. (10-1-75¡ 4-21-76, Ord. of 3-20-91) (b) ÀI!y pe:r SOl! v iolaLil!g tl!i s sectiol! sLall be guilty of a lllisdel11eal!o:r and shall be pUl!isLed ';'l! acco:rdance witl! .5ectiol! 1 6. (6-14-78¡ 4-13-88¡ 9-13-89) 28 State law reference--Authority of this section Code of Va., Section 10.1-1321. Sec. 9-24. Violations; penalties. Any person violating th±s any provision of this article, unless otherwise stated. shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor for each separate offense. (4-13-88) § 9-25 Fire Protection Sec. => 2:::;. COllst:r uetiOll of eH ticle. (b) Nothillg ill tIlis a:r ticle sllall be COilst:r ued to pe:r LLLi t. tbe bU.l..Ilillg o[ 110useIlold ga:rbage o:r allY othe:r lLLate:r ials except 111 aeco:rdallce ~ith tIlis a:rticle 01:: tIle 1::egulatious of tLe SLate Ai:r pollutiOll Cont:t:ol Boa:rd. (10-1-75; 4-21-76) Sec. 9-26. Leaf burning prohibited in certain areas. Pursuant to section 9-23.zta+1. (a), leaf burning 1S hereby prohibited within the following areas: (a) Waverly Subdivision, as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 697, page 382 and Deed Book 781, pages 267,270. (b) Berkeley Subdivision, as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 337, pages 336 and 337, Deed Book 345, pages 485 to 488, Deed Book 360, page 144A, and Deed Book 373, page 079. 29 (c) Hessian Hills Subdivision, Sections 5, 6 and 7, as platted and recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, in Deed Book 400, page 277, Deed Book 405, page 103, Deed Book 417, page 159 and Deed Book 622, pages 565-568. (12-16-87, Ord. of 3-20-91; Ord. of 11-3-93) Sec. 9-27. Reserved Open bUJ::I.Lihg prohibited in certaiù areas. All opel! bul:llillg is lle:reby p:rollibited witLill tLe followillg a:reas. (Ord. of 3-20-91) 30 DRAFT The County of Albemarle Fire Prevention Code Fee Schedule FEE $ 125.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 125.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 125.00 $ 75.00 SECTION CODE # Open Burning F-403.4 Bonfires F-403.8.2 Torches for Removing Paint F-404.2 Airports, Heliports and Helistops F-801.2 Refinishing of Pins or Lanes at Bowling Establishments F-901.2 Crop-Ripening and Coloring Processes F-1001.2 Dry Cleaning Plants F-l101.2 Dust Explosion Hazards F-1201.2 Flammable Spray and Dipping Operations F-1301.2 Fumigation and Thermal Insecticidal Fogging F-1401.2 Hazardous production Materials F-1501.2 Facilities Lumber Yards and Woodworking Plants F-1601.2 Tents and Air-Supported Structures F-2001.2 Vehicle-Wrecking Yard, Junk Yards and Waste Material-Handling Plants F-2102.1 Material Storage F-2103.1 Welding or Cutting, Calcium Carbide and Acetylene Generators F-2201.2 Gas Welding and Cutting Operations Cylinder or Container Storage F-2205.2 Calcium Carbide Systems F-2207.1 Acetylene Generators F-2208.1 Hazardous Materials and Chemicals F-2301.2 Aerosol Products F-2401.2 FEE $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 125.00 SECTION Cellulose Nitrate (pyroxylin) Plastics Combustible Fibers Compressed Gases Corrosives Cryogenic Liquid Explosives, Ammunition and Blasting Agents $ 250.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 Manufacture, Sell, or Operate a Terminal Store, Possess, or Otherwise dispose of Explosives or Blasting Agents Fireworks Use of Explosives or Blasting Agents $ 250.00 Fireworks - Wholesale $ 50.00 plus Fireworks - Public or Private Displays $ 75.00 Fireworks - Retail Sales to Public $ 50.00 plus $ 50.00 $ 75.00 $ 125.00 $ 125.00 $ 125.00 $ 125.00 $ 125.00 $ 125.00 Flammable and Combustible Liquids Removal, Repair, Modify, Alter and Abandon Storage Flammable and Combustible Liquids Flammable Solids Highly Toxic and Toxic Solids and Liquids Irritants, Sensitizers and Health Hazards Liquefied Petroleum Gas Organic Peroxides Liquid and Solid Oxidizers 2 CODE # F-2501.2 F-2601.2 F-2701.2 F-2801.2 F-2901.2 F-3001.2 F-3101.2 F-3201.2 F-3201.2,l F-3201.2,3 F-3201.2,4 F-3301.2 F-3401.2 F-3501.2 F-3601.2 F-3701.2 F-3801.2 FEE SECTION CODE # $ 125.00 Pesticide Storage F-3902.1.1 $ 125.00 Pyrophoric Materials F-4001.2 $ 125.00 Radium or other Radioactive Material F-4101.2 $ 125.00 Unstable (Reactive) Material F-4201.2 $ 125.00 Water-Reactive Material F-4301.2 OTHER FIRE RESCUE AND INSPECTION RELATED FEES $ 5.00 plus $ 5.00 $ 5.00 Fire Incident / Investigative Reports Environmental Assessment / Underground Storage Tank Survey Requests Photographic Requests 3 . $14fì Up T() Se~¡¿ P LA 6 l ¡ L f-k . ccr ì ilJP\ c:J->-, -/ (bCtry tv~~lCL c f1.<~P'TO -./ ~ ð J,.j ~ -;;? ~ G q~¿.¡ ""L- -- v J 8:2/ j- ~ 1-~7 5 &? >-r l/-:=5c::> '" j '\ ~ ~ ~ ~ -+ L.. - J·./)U/lI )£ Pr /(A,fl(- ~ . ~ . '111(3' 11.:9 '9~ /~~'71~~ - ,/ tV ~ MtN fi5Uf# J( V / )Ja.:)/hI'lCf þ-¡hlP1e V A!~ 1J¥ ,r / ~ i¡~(í:i~~/-) i W\~t, 4cv~ - -<-..."thy/¡ ('¿<r¡,y ~ k<iJ'^(t l'v\.¡Ûv, ~ S¡pJ:t f,4¿~;7 . r-- ¡-úîr- rsuJ r~·-'+ '. ~ New Albemarle County High School Public Hearing Fact Sheet Purpose: The public hearing is designed to solicit community feedback on whether or not to exercise an option on a 110 acre site adjacent to Piedmont Virginia Community College for locating a new high school and other potential governmental uses. · April, 1994 - Board of Supervisors endorses building a new high school. · May-June, 1994 - Community forums held to solicit input on new high school sites. · July, 1994 - County staff begin analyzing potential sites using selection criteria contained in the County's Community Facilities Plan addendum to the Comprehensive Plan. · October, 1994 - Fourteen original sites narrowed to 5 sites, Board authorizes staff to begin negotiations with 3 owners for access to property for preliminary geotechnical investigation. · January, 1995 - The owner of one of the three sites indicates unwillingness to sell property. The owner of a tract adjacent to Walton School indicates reluctance to sell and relates displeasure with condemnation proceedings on family's property when Walton School was built in the early 1970's. · March, 1995 - Option agreement secured on Hillcrest Property adjacent to Piedmont Virginia Community College for 110 acre site. Board agrees to eliminate other sites trom consideration at this time. Hillcrest Site (Proposed for New High School) · Approximate size - 110 acres · Adjacent to Piedmont Virginia Community College · Easy access to 1-64 and opportunity to make road connection to Avon Street · Served by public water and sewer on site · Close to the greatest concentration of students which will allow for reducing the student population at Albemarle High School · Purchase price of $1. 9 million A 110 acre option has been secured on this site with the intention of soliciting public input as to whether the County should exercise this option or reinitiate the site selection process to identify other possible locations. Site Development If the option is exercised, it is the County's intention to transfer 60-65 acres to the School Board for development of the new high school and associated atWetic fields. The balance of the acreage would be retained and a master plan developed which may consider possible locations for a future fire/rescue station to serve the area, potential future library branch, future county and school maintenance facilities, or other school or local government needs. It should be noted that if the option on this property is exercised, a commitment will be made to build a road to meet VDOT standards that would connect Avon Street and Route 20. This connector has been in the County's Capital Improvement Program for a number of years and is recommended in the Southern City Transportation Study recently completed. This connector would make access to the new school and the 1-64 interchange much easier trom Avon Street. Walton Site In response to public input, the School Board and Board of Supervisors considered a 108 acre tract adjacent to Walton Middle School. It was decided not to pursue further negotiations on this site due to: · Owner expressed reservations about selling property due to his family's experience of having the property for Walton condemned in the early 1970's. · Approximately 40 acres of the property would have been very difficult to develop because of topography. · RougWy 2/3 of the potential students for the new high school live north of Route 708. · Due to a lack of public utilities, there was concern over the impact on ground water supply related to an additional requirement of the State Water Control Board to provide a capacity of 24,000 gallons of water per day for the high school. Additionally, above ground water storage would be required for an adequate fire suppression system. · Due to a lack of public sewer, the school would have required a package treatment plant estimated at $500,000 for construction and $20,000 annually for operating costs. Construction Schedule · June 1, 1995 - Schematic design plan, programming/goals, concept development (3 months). o Design Development (3 months) - · Construction Documents and Bid (7 months) · July 1, 1996 - Construction (23 months) · June 1, 1998 - Completion REH,IIJdbm 95.026 ... ,. -., HilLCREST SITE _CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY LIMITS ~ - 6} o z w ~ w ~ --------- · · · · I BICENTENNIAL CENTER I 'NT. SEC.URITY· COMPLEX . ARMORY ~~ PIEDMONT VIRGINIA COMMMUNITY COLLEGE ... . . · . · . · . . . ROUTE ~~ I'" TO MONTICELLO MICHIE TAVERN CALVARY SAPTIST-> CHURCH ---------- I -:-:-:::::::-;... .~:,;.:.::::.:.:. I "§::.:.:-::.:.~ .=*:;-:::~:~::::~ I . '~:S!>~-::':':" , ~O:~-:.::::.:::;... I !>'i : ....-::: .::.::;:.:.;. ::§:~;o:8:: ~::: '::::::::;:;::;::.. I I :~::~~mif ·"~·:tf:f;:::· I I ~::~.::~-:>:o::.: '.:.: I ".f . OPTIONED I §k< ':::~~ SITE · .:.::::: · · - ---I I I I ........ .... I ...... LAKE DIVISION ~.., ...., :::::: 1\ + . TANDEM SCHOOL N ~ , it WATER TANK K~~J¿ ~ /S/9.5.- \t-~Œ <S Œ 0 ~ Œ-l..IRì..~ \ \\ ~¿\ .q \ \1 ~~\\ \ ðDD ~ 5 œi illD \\ \\' 1\.V'\ uL ; ¡ -.----.--- _.,-_.---~ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemf'.rle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME ¡4."Þl:l~\DF l. ::r;~E 5 (print) ADDRESS J Un WI L,., \) ~ t.,.. 0 W~./ 1> re. ..) C l-'tA~~UJ~~ VI~ , vA 1-"L£f0 \ ~ ~'" ~ DATE tf -~-qr- SIGNATURE ~r ,...",'. ~ \ D Œ© Œ 0 \I!! lot y,' \\~\ ,DR - 5 00j ! \ \ \ \ .. " \U \jL------. L---- - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemi3.rle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Hea1thcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME j-erry G. JDnes (print) ADDRESS I( ~,' IL.FIDW~Y br,ve C~ 'v,II~. VA , DATE 1-i-q 5' SIGNATURE nfr 'D Œ © Œ Q 1'lJ i[ \ ADQ - 5 œi i i ¡, L IG/ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME £. á/~f'ne ?¿7¿ e r f-..(" (print) ADDRESS 1('1-;;, 7J »T 7? £4 r /y .> v / // e , t,/,(/. ;;.,)..? $" C ~ ~ /?9~ Zh~~~ DATE SIGNATURE ¡rw.rn cs rn OWlli:¡,.rRi ¡ I :: II ¡ ! ~ ! L! pp 5 rnnr.: i : ~" I~..,..;¡ u' .' ! i ______ ii0 - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of J ABA's request. NAME Sq r)(h û. p, (q lìc:J (print) ¡U' Cf) Bor' /55 ChCH..lo-t-feSl>~ IIp) \.b. :;'J.,9tJ;;z~ PI33 Marc..~ 30-) (19.5 ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE /tU4/..¡v I /¿j ;. , - rD'~ Œ © rn 0 \:§ Œ~lrrr I I I I ~ . I' 1 ;)! ! I : 1\ I ßDQ - 5.... .. ¡: 1\\1 ~ ."'..'." UJi 1[01 ...-.,_.._------ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME / IV~R.ID fOR S (print) ADDRESS IDJ. IV 0 R.TIt Tí /~ LD C/ R CL/.::. CJ¡¡J!2¿ 0 TIE:; VI LLE tlA );( 90/ DATE $L - 03- J19S ~1/" .L 1 SIGNATURE r {lA'" I , , , , , . , llW - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME R u ~'-I TV 11'3 h+e.n 9 Q \~ {print) ADDRESS 'R 1--\ ~, ß ð X \"3 c¡ , XèSLù\\:-k ) J (' rc¡ (' (): tÁ- " :J.. ~ 74-7 DATE #3/9S- SIGNATURE G?~ il*rd Q , . .. -"~-'--'--_._-_.~,..._._.__._- -; (~ r¿ 0 \\~? i '" , : ¡__~J \:::7 L5 \ V/ : ~,' , j l J I r' _..:=_-~~:..¡ I :: I~~~µR ·5.. ¡~! ~.J - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME )! /jLr; /'11/'/ ß 5/ì¿¿Jl.j6/!- (print) ADDRESS ';;"'0 7/ 4/2 /< f-Á ¿UicI?J¿ ;P); /:d' , (}Aâ¿tI¿stl//!i ,J/ÍJ, ~96/ I . DATE ...ß.- 3ð-'7S- SIGNATURE ¿:/~~A' 1~1[g(Ç[gO~~~ ~. .- " 1995 ; ¡ u u ___, __ ._.__ 't-~'_~'_"_"""_""^'_ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Hea1thcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME ¡7J /1Æ¡' /1/.4/ / J)./0/¿K (print) }1p /J/ 1'7 c/1 /Ý )) .£- ¡ t/ e..- ADDRESS ~1509 11/ é/J/JRMIfr!'s ¿¡ /// e '" ~~ SIGNATURE ~~ I)~ 7//9 d d 9ð / DATE -3. /;? 9~- / - - _.~ ._---~ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemi'-rle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME )j7f e,s+~ (print) ADDRESS .s ¥5' 7é'rre// ~(LJ I-k 5' u.~ {b~ [/ A- .;2 ¿;..¿; d ( DATE ~~ ~ If$- SIGNATURE /t'~ ¿¡1-£-4 ~ ¡.. - PETITION - ') .......--......--. ._~ to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Hea1thcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME U, k \ ~ Ct y- b (] U (' (print) ADDRES~V( Ð , ~ 0 'I. 5 t== (:\ I{ \ '( S ,/1 \ \ e J Y c, ( '7- 2.f¡ 3k DATE .., .- 2- 7- c¡ <' SIGNATURE~/v1 j) ,I<': 3~",-c/ A ~ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME 1'1 - I] / "-- H It is ¡, N ~ i) E í..::: T è) í" (print) ADDRESS j).{'(i .;1/¡(Lr~[ '1/&'0..., OR. C ',/ i II- L I==- VA ~J-.-..,;) ,'2 DATE ,- - ) ! (\ t',~.\/' f'-- ?L,(¡ /17 ~ SIGNATURE (f , '.~ ! t , ---I V\A.~.{..J~(. ".L _ . ;..:'-c· "Y'- -.',- .. ... - PETITION - ~,Œ©¡gD~¡g~ ~[ ~pp - g~ 11~ --.1,,/ ! L____ : to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAMEH/lJ f}) ¡; l~A u.s ¡-j 11 JOolJ (print) ADDRESS /g;? /,3i!JC¡¿ ìr-fò;¿/U )JU {!H f)/2iiJ If &5 u r' 1/ e; ¡/ IJ ~?-- 9t1 ;;0 ( DATE 4-;--1S SIGNATURE ~ ¿~tLd~ #. .... - PETITION - \~~Œ~ ~\\\\\ \'..\ \ \.. ~p,' - ~:; j IJ I¡ .\ \\ ' J~ j JU \0L- \ \.--- to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemfirle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Hea1thcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME ~ újÍÌlðf)~ -SCe>-tf :Bun~e-I ) (print) ADDRESS ;< Lf/¿l, Srn~+h{;e-I£ t:oacp C ~aý /ò-f!- e.s ¡J: !!~, V-It d.J. c¡o I I DATE m'1rch 3/, 1'1''1.)-- I SIGNATURE ((~ ~ Cil~ I .- ... ,--,-- 'ID}g @ @ U'0' b ìi;'i ,\ APR - 31!Øi ~ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Hea1thcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME {?i-IÎ/~'V (!}/l.se Y' (print) / ADDRESS 13 ?:¿ ,Il {, ¿ /S~~ r 0~h e.- . /ò I u ( L' L ~' L) ¡:; ~ ¿~ c¡ ò / ~ ' ~/.$//95 , / SIGNATURE 1!1.~-é~ DATE 'I / H. (~U-L/ ( '-2~0Œ~ \-f':,'.': .. ".\ 1\·\~\5J \2:?_=-==--ì,\\. \ \ i I -- "\0\' \\\ \ r \, \ \\v ., . \\\. 'i..\ \ \ \" - 3 I!Øi j\0\ ':.\\\ \,' \ \ \i\~L ë\ ~ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME -crD, a//dó¡(!) (print) ADDRESS ¿bt !Jý;QhtON -¡)-/ ¿/If/ y-s ~ì( 1-6/ UQ; )JÝf:;£ DATE ; ,~I \ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarie County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME SUe. 10 éf/ph/id (pri ) ADDRESS ((?¿- I) hcJ-;7L / t"? .c;- (!rCJ~~+ ) ¡fa. ;;<::J9,~~ DATE 3Iq~/~5 SIGNATURE~.f' /. é~¿¿-~ , --."""., - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME À N I\l c..Q.Pt-~9 (print) ADDRESS \ tL~ 'tJ e \J ~b \) \j ,,'?- \.. A-- \..H::::- ~ 1:~:'(2- L D\ -"t 8& \J l LLE::- \. \J rt l d.. ?.q D I 1 \'v\å/\ tJ\.30 \ q?J ~ ) L~ DATE SIGNATURE , ... ~<0~\~-\ D ~. \\ \ \ . ~o' _ 3 I!f6 j@\ '\ \\\ \ \ '\tJU~ \ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albem~le County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. J< 0 ß G 1'2- TN, C ~, L ('-/ /4 N NAME'5·.TL:\ N E, ¡~- C~ \... ) L.. N A I" (print) ADDRESS 7- S-c/ T/-:f (-..j Tu P~' (V) rN reÞ, .,ct s 2? CI-fAI7...LC r iE SV/LL C.-I ~,/I~_- --? '7 L, /'./ L. ,-- /' L, DATE r C'- a3- ?,L-'- 1-:) SIGNATURE-S '~(/' (' , I (-cr'C-~~:t\--L -x--=--- LL..-l~~ . ,(. . ./Y l I' . .¡ . I' v l.c-Æ /'- '-c. ,C "-', )... :.~:,..-.c r¡yŒ~rsr. I.::::::.... ~ L::; ,j i ~ -'-. ~ *R 3 I 1995 ! II i i II I:) i JL/ ---.--..... - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME )-.'\'1'"5. r-'(-eAeY-~c.k cWf. DeV\srn()¡r-p (print) ADDRESS \:¿ 1 Bo1ii Vl..i bYQ() k~ Chô,"l.ottesv¡~e. VA. :2:2 'lor· 8'f11 DATE ¡\It è\r c..h :29 /995'-> . SIGNATURE }/ÞUr..ii- ' -1 J1.Ji. c~ E, n--~fl.lY'YV0ZL- '-.-" ...... .. l!r~D--Œ©~-Õ-~Œ if\\ I lil/L I ~ , APP -3æ ¡@¡ ml - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME GJ6~~A D()Vý13)/ (pnnt) ADDRESS I!ø·, ~ V / V / C'V~'¡;;kJ v'lJ, d;1·1:?1 . 3-3/- 9~-- DATE SIGNATURE ~ ~~~ n r;=1 .J L5 f i --.-.-"--.-- ----..." ~ ~~¡ ",' 31nN: ;....:...r< -- I~ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to \ vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. SIGNATURE .JÞ-50b1 ECkÇQt2P, -l? (print) 3() ED~M. De· CµAQ~JLk-E VA t;2Q..c:ro3 I 3 -3/-95 r(j~ NAME ADDRESS DATE .. .' i , '; ---- - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. ADDRESS I J ¿ B. F;¡(h es- I (print) 7Zt t< -7 /~, é·~~. k: 1, ý(¡ I 1-/ r-r¡i ,:2 , I I NAME ,.~. é[ J<! Y (/""VÁ ¿"( /~ /Ci f / ,,~ 5' ¡/ í' 1/ ~ ill /1'~ DATE T-/ / I ,-. ,) ,. -. , -) SIGNATURE l'/·~) tl .£'';) l~). ~ . . ' z1 /- -i-e. ,/_ ,..~.---,--_.._--_.--,., . ~ F II y¡ .. · ~ ~ w D L5 In · ll~i *II 3 I 81 ~ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albem~rle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME ~ ... ~t2Z ELI. (print) ADDRESS I '1 Qk¡ 7 ef¿ " vI(. 'r ""þ.. 0 C¡ ' }"\.o Tfl!S """l.uI. \.. vlt .... 'tr, 1 DATE 3)JIJ!'è1.'- J OCKA/HID ~ SIGNATURE ¿;~ ~'71dR ,~.,.-". .: ~~: ~,U:~~~ l - PETITION - I to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME o r¿ Iu E .J" 0 R~;¡ I'J T (print) ADDRESS r~ - i-¿ 8 t3- c:>:.c 4 C' ~l r~k.2.irl() tt~,",vLl'c. ¡ Vi~- l.l'iC' DATE 3.. - î D' (I.S - SIGNATURE ~-t~ () ~~j- / / ~.. :. . -'.-... -. . ®j--- -' ,-',"" í\ r¡ œ ~lli (Ç;...-" , " ! i ',\, ~ D I..--- Lc ,i " _J ......./ \-.. -------. I :, ¡ ¡ ~ . , "I \ 1 ~',; r I' '\'" ¡:-n 4I!J!Jj l'i 1 ~~L .. Ij - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME ~\=\\X\~- \.J\ ~-,~ n~ l \l u..J Ii j (pnnt)"-~ ADDRESS \:(\ \~) ("; '( .;=:-;' c~ 1 ~( l(,~~,c,\'. \ \f ~ \3 \ q!~- , , SIGNATURE "1 \ ''Z l ,\1: \í\"l~W.Q l_ I \ ' \ \j \J L '\ '"' - c~'. ('" ":':; ~t~l ¡:::J..~ I .' . ) DATE II D Œ (Ç .Œ G\\I1 Œ \\~1 \ \ APL 3 æ; liD \ \ L \ L - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME Wð H Pr.:5 J J A-~l) t5 <ð W S 1<" (print) ADDRESS ~ 77 M, {) Q A- ~ I./) I-c.., ;(0 A-1J V' It- .).- >--f 0 I C~£. C-t) lnE-J" (/ I ~ 5/.30/<¡J- SIGNATURE . ,~. DATE \ÍD'~ Œ~U.'ìOg ~~I \ \\ I) \ i"' INC 'WI \ \\ \.'\. .\ '. J ~ \ \ \ I, \I \ i J \ \ !,- \\ \ 1\ ,',' \\ ¡ , \ \ \ ,1\ W:o..-- ~ \~ -- - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemi3-rle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. DATE [ ~r ..- 'Q WAveS) J c 0 ¡l) ·(57 .--- (pnnt) 2740 )(¿\/ wtc; T Yr<.. (' (+.4 ,2 r;;!,7"é,> \1) I {is \/4 1t1~_ ~llq.¿r- 01 NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE .. ':<0--':;-"'-' ~ .... .' Œ © rn 0 WI Uci frl\- --;¡ MM 3 ¡ 1995 ill! Ii ¡! V - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME IT (~J le/7 5. )(~J1JIG (print) c lid ¡/c2 f7 c! e E d-v / .5 J/h 7;ê~ -/7/ /17"3 SIGNATURE ~~ ;f-~c:t.¿ ADDRESS ~ð (Ih ¡~~ ~ J ~ y1~ ~ DATE j · " 1 \ \J/ ',L:) , ',; !.'~> g u \':1 l'::::::> \i I' '·'D\~\\\\\\ \~{lpQ - 4. j~ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME Ifel e. l\j (¡ : ~ If N rl Fú R rL (print) ADDRESS !-,1. 0 'K I (] VJ 1>, n 'I 1\ \ rr L ffftV'" Ii) e.S DATE ti - 4 - 95 SIGNATURE /ú:.).~/I'Î _ 0. clvY1-'- ¿-k-CA..-1-ð/ I' 0.29, I ,.,.z (/ i....... D ¡g © ¡g-~-- . f AP" -3~ J~ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME CI7~/'./ ¿/II~.¡;,,/q/ (print) ADDRESS ~f- J ,/?tJX >Cð(~SO/#~ 3/3//fÇ ~t:l{7- ;/' , ¿/,# ;?~~ DATE SIGNATURE a.-4- #~# .,-..- @~î :'\-~-Ì\ @ ~ Œ D~-~l.\.\~.'\.\\ \) \ Iii \1\ \ \ \ .~PR -3_ Î\\)\\ i \ \ Jv;J · \ ~L \ [ ---' - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME ADDRESS - DATE :)- 30 - c¡~- SIGNATURE /tqG;2u~ t ----- ..... ---r:::1 " '" ",,":" \'1,;, :.'j \~'" i, \.-"·ì·:\ ' . ..~. <::; l~~ i~~;!~I.\ \.. \ ' i,\ \C_-=-¡ \9<1i i~ '--=- ~ -- - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME T~e Ve., r lv/ 3. I'ìo r+~/ Yì I (print) f ADDRESS 9. D. f~ò I- L-J 1 J.. C~r·dli-ì5JI' ¡ Ie V A- dd0Y:1 I DATE uJ~ 3 05 SIGNATURE ~ 'J. Vflc~ I~~-- I/! r (11\ \ ¡ MAR ¡9Yh J i \' U U! I 1.--__..._..._ _w.._......_._~..._ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Hea1thcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME Margaret E. Mason (print) P. O. Box 161 ADDRESS Keene, \/ A 229% DATE March 30. 1995 SIGNATURE - '/¡7U/;! '7Y¡4N-.'~ .. - PETITION - . r'.··' ':.-J \·"-C, : \", ,'. " \0'·~\..S (Ç7 LS u \.... -..-." II \ ! ,\ I II",' ", \, l\k~J~ \li L =- - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME Pr:c':, be r'0uf C'C\;')~ 10 (print) ADDRESS q \ <6" _~ ,,1C)(--,1fl '-4 ; e~ ~6. C)!'c),Jlej ·vA. dd101~ DATE '"-jh/~ ¿9 0 /qQ$ /~(J SIGNATURE c JP1:l( >c'XÁ.f. _ '-/1~' · - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME ¡q \ e.) a \\t\e..~c-ha. Y\ - G-o N e~ (print) ADDRESS a I) ~ t"J H\1ci'r\1.I\\\C ~. J 3'1 Q.~Ql)t~\\~c;,vl\I.~_) (JÄ· l.-?-cre)/ DATE A~~ ~ 1QQS- SIGNATURE 0'1\0 r - ('r;I.l.>Il'\.~ - Grl.. - .~ · ~~\.:...\\ \~LS ~ \.1.\ \ \\\ i'l \\ ., ·,1 \ ,:' \\\ \ \ \\\ ~PQ - A ~ \IV)\ \\~~\~:v, \' \ \ Ü _J \_~ - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME {} tU'tJ ~ J'7 K. ¡t{ rYl-alM l J11 . (print) ADDRESS Po 80 x. Z. 3 ¡ 5cMf:sv,l~; vA d.tfsro DATE 4/3/'15' SIGNATURE 4;< ~- .H - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albem~rle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $ 100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and f~ture families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. SIGNATURE ftlfYJ( 1<~6/£(( . - (print) 1- 7 (';;- ~4f f'JfJ7>/ I1J 'Í?i), :2, j "5/ /1:;- ~ I~ NAME ADDRESS DATE .. ~~...~ .~.. . 0. .... .' . . .. " - .. r<.' rm,¡" ~ ~ D\Ý/~ r~~\i ( ''''D ,- I ~I- ...l1 ,~ I - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME MALINDA FAYE SAFLEY (print) 2516 EASTHAM ROAD ADDRESS CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901 DATE 04/03/95 SIGNATURE llr,ÚuJ:r~~ ID-f¡" ŒJ@ŒU¡vl';: lY@,' Ie. 11r=:::::71//!¡ U:----------J' '{ , ,.....1 " I' ----= ~. -..._~ .. - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME M \.Á R,·p...L lÙ Su.. LL; \( Þ¡~ (print) ADDRESS 703 ACD~N L..:..~~ ~ A-«J~ \ l e.,ç;: J ; (( €..I I J A. ~;;¿9õ3 - Cj 1~1 DATE ~.PÑ ,;¡,.c, I \qq.Ç SIGNATURE ~~ cr-- ---.-..-.--- , \UJ\ -. .. llllH ~~L MAA J t~" l~ - - ..- - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME ,[ JJ IV) f ,S ,D (print) -74 Þ /__ 0 /( I ADDRESS rð ß ~ ~ ,j' ~~4 7/C~ þ7-9/~ DATE ~ -- :;::, f-- -- / o¡ '1 5- SIGNATURE J ~ )!J. 7 ~o... .. .., . œ- -@ ~~f~\\ ~--- \\ \ \ 3_ 1\;\ -- ~- ..-,-,~.,~_.---.--- - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME euí~ 12· WA-LJ(eR (print) ADDRESS /1r; 7 Ofl..e. B /¿po,( Rd ~ ~12 It> fI~tJ,tIt.- ¡ U It ~Ç)c;o J DATE ':b -3' 9~ SIGNATURE £a p uJ~ '" .. - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME'(fì i ,u s F. vi, .~T,-:; (- (print) ADDRESS ;,L 2- 13 i ft G((. 11.) ¡/ 1 L ,~µ ~ //J /, ,. l, ¡Ý¡ Iff?!- (Ì) it (Ç--1' ¡/ J L ~¡;." V A Z L c¡ ¿) 2- DATE ~l//-;)..'Fl//q Ó SIGNATURE J·t Lt7:~~~~, -------- [()..rvÎ(YlI e.. Q~ùy-~~--~ . L. " ,..:... \\ \¿.~ çy..\ \ \ \=;0 -?i \~ ?S I ~:::::..7::'::;" ¡ 'ì (~J ,~Lt- ~/¿, \. <.;......-.. l I \,..~'-_,'j:});...s~~~-ç:::.... ..'\,0..~)..'~S- ""'1 '"?> <'ì:;- J) J .¡'J. '/ [l¿~ Ì\4- \ VA.j n- I Ih,,/n~s /;~¡ -n-- l d ¡ '(. C/l. ... Ü 7 t' 5.", /i": V-f}'\t<-{ Þa.~...f ( J I iÇ S ,\),_\ \I! l--\:~\C. ¿~ \ ¿._,i.. q\\'.), (-)(\\L.~.:H...,,-,,,c·' \\( \... f.\ .1:) (I.): j'~J ç' ~~~( G l..\1 :-skY::J - PETITION - 1\ \.. L \ '- ~ -Ir ~ ?J;~-) ~,.nd/! 1"\ C" -P,J. K \ 1/ I!.i( \'-' l~"'>'V\ \ ,..~- I 'I \..... '- ,-- ~\ }--..-'l, ~-i,...~L~ÙJ:l4 L/ ( (,-:2)}q ~) ',-'1 l.~ .=)~.¡ :~ .¡ ,~z 'h 5' to the .. \,..,........ '\' Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME l ¿ i ft~) ¿ ,_5¿,z ,n./:\ ,¡~,¿ J£ t-:t'::l·f-tH,:':T7C~ r) - lr.j~¿~' ¡ t. j (print) . -"~-"''''-~'''''''------'--'-'' ..-,-' ,---ø' /'" ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE -, , . . , , ""-.---.. -.-.....- .~.., ..'. -'"---.._~._."-_._- - PETITION - to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County to vote in favor of making a grant of $100,000 to the Jefferson Area Board for Aging for the construction of the new Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center on Hillsdale Drive. The new Center is critically needed for the well-being of all present and future families in Albemarle County who are, or will be, coping with the tremendous demands of caring for an impaired older adult or non-elderly disabled person. Given that the Jefferson Area Board for Aging is an agent of the County of Albemarle, charged with provided quality care and services to the elderly in Albemarle, we believe a grant of 5 % ($100,000) of the total goal for this project ($2,000,000) is an appropriate and highly desirable action for the County to take. Please rule in favor of JABA's request. NAME~~ ~ ~ (print) ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE 111995 -- .------- a.Z ~-r- c:¿1 () 7 If#( ß. R. F~ ~'1 ~ -4. /{ J~ ~.uJ _ ~Ù\W\ ~~/--- f D. ß lJ X g 7 '" 0 ¡J/¡y (].Slol'V ~ 6 j - S"77g' \)-6 )()a X 9"ð Q.-\IQ.-Vv'-\;~ ~ ç ~ - '- ð cr r.r J~me5 ¡=: /:'¡~..J./(ie,r~().d ,~}<ÞóV 1f¿}J¿þ~ /J fIe-: .-(/' "' Vq, (-?f', - r; r.j Cø ) 2.2y~J ~ Á~ .-:< L" ....:' ¿1:),.\, !;f'y' r: h ,ç' ,..:/ é- f k~ ¿ >4 i/a C -Æ,,-LuI ~; Ú/,/;'\c po. .6òx 5"1!--/) Gok:A()^J5v,II~) I~ '0 (703) 83 2..- 73'+~