HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-04-12
FIN A L
7:00 P.M.
April 12, 1995
Room 7, County Office Building
1) Call to Order.
2) Pledge of Allegiance.
3) Moment of Silence.
4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
5) Consent Agenda (on next sheet) .
6) Presentation of Certificate of Appreciation.
7) Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 2.1, Agricul-
tural and Forestal Districts, by adding parcels to Section 2.1.4(d),
Blue Run Agricultural and Forestal District. Proposed addition
consists of three parcels of 21.670 ac on W sd of Rt 777 near
Barboursville.
8) Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 2.1, Agricul-
tural and Forestal Districts, by adding parcels to Section 2.1.4(0),
Buck Mountain Agricultural and Forestal District. Proposed addition
consists of one parcel of 26.890 ac on E sd of Rt 601.
9) Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 2.1, Agricul-
tural and Forestal Districts, by adding parcels to Section 2.1.4(g),
Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal District. Proposed addi-
tion consists of two parcels of 172.0 ac on W sd of Rt 821 near
Millington.
10) Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact Chapter 2.1, Agricul-
tural and Forestal Districts, by adding parcels to Section 2.1.4(e),
Keswick Agricultural and Forestal District. Proposed addition
consists of two parcels of 6.3 ac on NW sd of Rt 22.
11) ZMA-94-23. CMA Properties, Inc.jColonial Auto Center. Public Hearing on
a request to rezone approx 1.1 ac from PD-SC to HC located at end of
Meyers Dr including cul-de-sac of Meyers Dr. TM45,P94A(part). Site
recommended for Regional Service in Neighborhood 1 by the Comprehen-
sive Plan. Rio Dist.
12) ZMA-94-26. Glenmore Associates. Public Hearing on a request to amend
existing agreements of the Glenmore PRD to establish modified
setbacks. Site recommended for VR in the Village of Rivanna.
Rivanna Dist.
13) ZMA-94-27. Forest Lakes Associates. Public Hearing on a request to
amend existing agreements of ZMA-91-04 (Forest Lakes South) to allow
modification of open space and setback requirements. Property zoned
PUD is recommended for low density residential 1-4 dujac) by the
Comprehensive Plan. Rivanna Dist.
14) SP-94-32. Free Union Baptist Church & Memorial Cemetery. Public Hearing
on a request to expand existing cemetery located on 2.85 ac zoned RA
located on N sd of Rt 609 approx 900 ft W of Rt 601. TM29,P26.
White Hall Dist.
15) Approval of the FY 1995-96 County Operating Budget.
16) Set tax rates for 1995.
17) Approval of FY 1995-96 Capital Improvements Program.
18) Set public hearing to amend and reordain Chapter 2, Administration,
Section 2-2.1, Compensation of board of supervisors.
19) Approval of Minutes: January 4, 1995.
20) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
21) Adjourn.
CON S E N T
AGENDA
FOR APPROVAL:
5.1 Appropriation Requests:
a) Gardening for Nature Grant - $150, (Form #940055) .
b) Public Safety Grant - $16,839, (Form #940056) .
5.2 Authorize Chairman to execute Service Agreement with Crozet Volunteer
Fire Department, Inc.
FOR INFORMATION:
5.3 Copy of Planning Commission minutes for March 28, 1995.
5.4 Memorandum dated March 27, 1995, from Roxanne W. White, Assistant County
Executive, re: Housing Coordinator.
5.5 Letter dated April 6, 1995, from J. H. Shifflett, Jr., Maintenance
Operations Manager, Department of Transportation, providing notice that
Route 643, between Route 29 and Route 649, will be closed to through
traffic from Monday, April 10, through Friday, April 14.
5.6 Acme Design Technology Co., December, 1994, operating results and year-
ending December 31, 1994, Financial Report (on file in Clerk's office).
~u~
'-'"
~
David P Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scollsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance
FROM:
Ella W. Carey, Clerk ~
April 14, 1995
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Appropriation Request
At its meeting on April 12, 1995, the Board of Supervisors took action
on the following appropriation request:
Item No. 5.1a. Appropriation Request: Gardening for Nature Grant -
$150, (Form #940055) .
APPROVED. Attached is the signed appropriation form.
Agenda Item No. 5.1b. Appropriation Request: Public Safety Grant -
$16,839, (Form #940056).
APPROVED. Attached is the signed appropriation form.
Agenda Item No. 5.2. Authorize Chairman to execute Service Agreement
with Crozet Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. APPROVED.
Agenda Item No. 15. Approval of the FY 1995-96 County Operating Budget.
ADOPTED the attached resolution.
Agenda Item No. 16. Set tax rates for 1995. ADOPTED. Attached is the
signed resolution.
Agenda Item No. 17. Approval of FY 1995-96 Capital Improvements
Program. APPROVED as presented.
EWC:mms
Attachments (4)
cc: Roxanne White
Richard E. Huff, II
Dr. Kevin Casner
Carl Pumphrey
File
*
Printed on recycled paper
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
94/95
NUMBER
940056
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR TRAFFIC UNIT EXPANSION PROJECT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1153031145129900 REIMBURSABLE OVERTIME $15,156.00
1153031145300205 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1,683.00
TOTAL
$16,839.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2153033000330306
FEDERAL GRANT
$16,839.00
TOTAL
$16,839.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
POLICE
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~~.3"-~
~-/ý- r-5-
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
94/95
NUMBER
940055
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR GARDENING FOR NATURE GRANT FOR HOLLYMEAD SCHOOL.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1310460205600000 MISC SUPPLIES $150.00
TOTAL
$150.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2310424000240710
GARDENING FOR NATURE GRANT
$150.00
TOTAL
$150.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
SCHOOLS
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
fi~f4,d.
~-3-9.5"
~-/i -ý.5-
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that
the operations budget for the County for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 1995, be
approved as follows:
General Government Administration
Judicial
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Development
Parks, Recreation and Culture
Community Development
County/City Revenue Sharing
Refunds
Capital Improvements
Education - Operations
Education - Self-Sustaining Funds
Education - Debt Service
Capital/Debt Service Reserve
Contingency Reserve
$ 4,796,974
1,667,903
7,966,802
2,021,441
5,074,511
2,803,880
2,201 ,941
5,049,991
41 ,000
2,300,000
63,774,854
5,895,827
6,845,880
250,000
62,126
TOTAL
$ 110,753,130
* * * * * *
1, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true,
correct copy of a resolution unanimously adopted by the Board of County
Supervisors, Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular held meeting on April
12, 1995.
· .
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does hereby
set the County Levy for the taxable year 1995 for General County purposes at Seventy-
Two Cents ($0.72) on every One Hundred Dollars worth of real estate; at Four Dollars
and Twenty-Eight Cents ($4.28) on every One Hundred Dollars worth of assessed value
of personal property; at Four .Dollars and Twenty-Eight Cents ($4.28) on every One
Hundred Dollars worth of assessed value of machinery and tools; and at Seventy-Two
Cents ($0.72) on every One Hundred Dollars worth of assessed value of public service
assessments; and
FURTHER orders that the Director of Finance of Albemarle County assess and collect on all
taxable real estate and all taxable personal property, including machinery and tools not
assessed as real estate, used or employed in a manufacturing business, not taxable by the
State on Capital; including Public Service Corporation property except the rolling stock
of railroads based upon the assessment fixed by the State Corporation Commission and
certified by it to the Board of Supervisors both as to location and valuation; and including
all boats and watercraft under five tons as set forth in the Code of Virginia; and vehicles
used as mobile homes or offices as set forth in the Virginia Code; except farm machinery,
farm tools, farm livestock, and household goods as set forth in the Code of Virginia,
Section 58.1-3500 through Section 58.1-3508.
* * * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey. do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of
a resolution unanimously adopted by the Board of County Supervisors, Albemarle County,
Virginia, at a regular held meeting on April 12, 1995.
r
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martin
R ¡vanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsvílle
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Mil!er
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director, Planning &
Community Development
Ella W. Carey, Clerk::[J;J C---
April 14, 1995
Board Actions of April 12, 1995
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Following is a list of actions taken by the Board of Supervisors at its
meeting on April 12, 1995:
Agenda Item No.1. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order at
7:00 p.m., by the Chairman, Mr. Perkins.
Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the
PUBLIC.
There were none.
Agenda Item No. 5.1a. Appropriation Request: Gardening for Nature
Grant - $150, (Form #940055). APPROVED. Signed appropriation form forwarded
to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 5.1b. Appropriation Request: Public Safety Grant -
$16,839, (Form #940056). APPROVED. Signed appropriation form forwarded to
Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 5.2. Authorize Chairman to execute Service Agreement
with Crozet Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. APPROVED.
Agenda Item No.6. Presentation of Certificate of Appreciation.
Presented to Calvin Jones.
Agenda Item No.7. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact
Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, by adding parcels to Section
2.1.4(d), Blue Run Agricultural and Forestal District. Proposed addition
consists of three parcels of 21.670 ac on W sd of Rt 777 near Barboursville.
ADOPTED the attached Ordinance.
*
Printed on recycled paper
Memo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
April 14, ],995
Date:
Page 2
Agenda Item No.8. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact
Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, by adding parcels to Section
2.1.4(0), Buck Mountain Agricultural and Forestal District. Proposed addition
consists of one parcel of 26.890 ac on E sd of Rt 601. ADOPTED the attached
Ordinance.
Agenda Item No.9. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact
Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, by adding parcels to Section
2.1.4(g), Moorman's River Agricultural and Forestal District. Proposed addi-
tion consists of two parcels of 172.0 ac on W sd of Rt 821 near Millington.
ADOPTED the attached Ordinance.
Agenda Item No. 10. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reenact
Chapter 2.1, Agricultural and Forestal Districts, by adding parcels to Section
2.1.4(e), Keswick Agricultural and Forestal District. Proposed addition
consists of two parcels of 6.3 ac on NW sd of Rt 22. ADOPTED the attached
Ordinance.
Agenda Item No. 11. ZMA-94-23. CMA Properties, Inc.jColonial Auto
Center. Public Hearing on a request to rezone approx 1.1 ac from PD-SC to HC
located at end of Meyers Dr including cul-de-sac of Meyers Dr. TM45,P94A
(part). Site recommended for Regional Service in Neighborhood 1 by the
Comprehensive Plan. Rio Dist.
APPROVED ZMA-94-23 as proffered in the attached letter dated April 4,
1995, signed by H. Carter Myers, III, President, C.M.A. Properties, Inc., as
follows: "(1) that no use will be placed on the 1.091 acre parcel located at
the west end of Myers Drive which would generate traffic in excess of 200
trips per day from that use of the parcel, based on the latest edition of the
Trip Generation Standards published by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers."
Agenda Item No. 12. ZMA-94-26. Glenmore Associates. Public Hearing on
a request to amend existing agreements of the Glenmore PRD to establish
modified setbacks. Site recommended for VR in the Village of Rivanna.
Rivanna Dist. APPROVED ZMA-94-26 subject to the previous agreements with the
following amendment to #10:
Development shall be in general accord with the Application Plan and
Glenmore Rezoning Application including textual program of development
as described in Exhibit B to the petition, except that the setbacks for
Tax Map 93A1, Parcell and Tax Map 93A4, Section D, Parcels 3, 5, 6, 8,
9, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 36, 37, 38, 44, 45, 47,
48, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 64, 68, shall be as
follows:
Front Yard: Depth of front yard should be no less than twenty-
five (25) feet except, in Section D or future cottage sections,
the front yard may be reduced to ten (10) feet for a maximum
lineal distance of twenty-eight (28) feet provided that there
shall be no openings except for garage door(s) in any exterior
wall of the enclosed structure parallel to the street between
twenty-five (25) and ten (10) feet from the front lot line.
Memo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
April 14, 1995
Date:
Page 3
Side Yard: Depth of side yard shall be no less than fifteen (15)
feet except, in Section D or future cottage sections, the depth of
the side yard shall be no less than three (3) feet.
Corner Side Yard: Depth of side yard of lots located at street
intersections with common open space of a minimum width of fifteen
(15) feet between the lot and one of the street's right-of-way may
be reduced to seven and one-half (7.5) feet.
Rear Yard: Depth of rear yard shall be no less than twenty (20)
feet except in cases in which the rear lot abuts common open
space or the golf course, then the rear yard of such a lot may be
reduced to ten (10) feet.
Agenda Item No. 13. ZMA-94-27. Forest Lakes Associates. Public
Hearing on a request to amend existing agreements of ZMA-91-04 (Forest Lakes
South) to allow modification of open space and setback requirements. Property
zoned PUD is recommended for low density residential 1-4 du/ac by the Compre-
hensive Plan. Rivanna Dist. APPROVED ZMA-94-27 subject to the previous
agreements with the following amendment to #10:
Development shall be in general accord with the Application Plan and
Forest Lakes South Rezoning Application including textual program of
development as described in "Forest Lakes South Rezoning Application"
amended August 13, 1991 to the petition, except that the setbacks for
Tax Map 46B5, Parcell and Tax Map 46B6, Section A, Parcel 24, 47,
Section C, Parcel 4, 5, 9, 26, 32, shall be as follows:
Front Yard: Depth of front yard should be no less than twenty-
five (25) feet except the front yard may be reduced to ten (10)
feet for a maximum lineal distance of twenty-eight (28) feet
provided that there shall be no openings except for garage door(s)
in any exterior wall of the enclosed structure parallel to the
street between twenty-five (25) and ten (10) feet from the front
lot line.
Side Yard: Depth of side yard shall be no less than seven and one
half (7 1/2) feet except, in sections specified as patio sections,
the depth of the side yard shall be no less than three (3) feet.
Corner Side Yard: Depth of side yard of lots located at street
intersections with common open space of a minimum width of fifteen
(15) feet between the lot and one of the street's right-of-way may
be reduced to seven and one-half (7.5) feet.
Rear Yard: Depth of rear yard shall be no less than twenty (20)
feet except in cases in which the rear lot abuts common open
space, then the rear yard of such a lot may be reduced to ten (10)
feet.
Agenda Item No. 14. SP-94-32. Free Union Baptist Church & Memorial
Cemetery. Public Hearing on a request to expand existing cemetery located on
2.85 ac zoned RA located on N sd of Rt 609 approx 900 ft W of Rt 601.
TM29,P26. White Hall Dist. APPROVED SP-94-32 subject to the following
conditions:
Memo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
April 14, 1995
Date:
Page 4
1.
The cemetery shall be limited to the existing cemetery area and
that area shown on a plan of the Free Union Baptist Memorial
Cemetery west section dated 4/20/93 and initialed WDF, 3/8/95.
Use of the area shown as "reserved for future cemetery develop-
ment" shall require amendment of this permit;
2.
Compliance with all Health Department regulations.
Agenda Item No. 15. Approval of the FY 1995-96 County Operating Budget.
ADOPTED the attached resolution.
The Board discussed having Dr. McLeod come to the May 3rd meeting to
provide information on how she proposes to use the additional $7000 for the
Child Health partnership.
It was the consensus of the Board that staff bring back a report on May
3rd on the implications of the County fully funding the Northside Reference
Librarian position.
Agenda Item No. 16. Set tax rates for 1995. ADOPTED the attached
resolution which has been forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Agenda Item No. 17. Approval of FY 1995-96 Capital Improvements
Program. APPROVED as presented.
Agenda Item No. 18. Set public hearing to amend and reordain Chapter 2,
Administration, Section 2-2.1, Compensation of board of supervisors. SET
PUBLIC HEARING for June 14, 1995 to provide for a three percent salary
increase.
Agenda Item No. 20. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the
BOARD.
Mr. Marshall announced that he would not be present at the Board
meetings of May 10 and May 17, 1995.
Mr. Tucker said he has been discussing with Cole Hendrix issues concern-
ing the Jail Authority and jail expansion. Mr. Hendrix and some of his staff
will be meeting with the financial advisors of the Jail Board next week to get
some additional information to address questions raised by City Council.
In response to a question raised by Mr. Martin, Mr. Tucker explained
that the State has approved an increase in the elevation of the Landfill. The
plans will soon go to site plan review and then will come before the Commis-
sion. If the Commission's decision is appealed, the plans will come before
the Board.
The Commonwealth Transportation Board will hold a work session on the
Meadow Creek Parkway on Wednesday, April 19, 1995, at 2:00 p.m. The meeting
will be held in Richmond in the CTB's Board Room.
Memo To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
April 14, 1995
Date:
Page 5
It was the consensus of the Board that when landowners are notified of
approval of inclusion of their lands in an agricultural/forestal district, the
letter express appreciation for the service they are doing for the County.
Mrs. Thomas asked for a staff report on locally related state services
that will be impacted by people taking the early retirement buy-out offered by
the Governor.
Mr. Bowerman asked for a status report on the proposed large brightly
colored special use permit and rezoning notices.
Mr. Davis reported that the lawsuit pending against the County challeng-
ing the denial of the Greene special use permit was non-suited on Friday. He
has been advised that they will not refile.
ing.
Mr. Martin announced that he would not be present for the April 19 meet-
Mr. Perkins announced he would not be present for the May 17 meeting.
Mrs. Thomas asked about the status of the issue regarding the Preddy
Creek property raised in a letter from Elizabeth Petofi. Mr. Tucker said
staff is reviewing Ms. Petofi's concerns and will possibly bring something to
the Board on May 3rd.
THE BOARD CANCELED ITS' MAY 17, 1995 REGULAR NIGHT MEETING.
The joint public hearing with the School Board on the new high school
site is scheduled for April 25, 1995 at 7:00 p.m., in the Auditorium.
Agenda Item No. 21. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 8:07 p.m.
EWC:mms
Attachments (6)
cc: Richard E. Huff, II
Roxanne White
Jo Higgins
Amelia McCulley
Bruce Woodzell
Larry Davis
File
i ~..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE -Y·2·?.s--
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TlTI.E:
Appropriation - Gardening for Nature Grant
AGENDA DATE:
April 12, 1995
ITEM Nl1MRER:
9$.~iflo¿( ~:/4)
AC-TION:
INFORMATION:
SIJRJEC-TIPROPOSA 1 JRF.QJJF..ST:
Request approval of $150.00 appropriation for a Gardening for
Nature Grant as detailed on Appropriation #940055
C-ONSENT AGENDA:
AC-TlON: X
INFORMATION:
A TT AC-HMENTS: Yes
STAFF C-ONTAC-T~I:\):
Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Castner, Breeden
REVIEWED BY:
BAC-KGROIJND:
At its meeting on March 27, 1995, the School Board approved the appropriation of a Gardening for Nature Grant for Hollymead Elementary
School.
Dlsc-nSSION:
A Gardening for Nature Grant in the amount of $150.00 was awarded from the Department of Natural Resources, Virginia Museum of
Natural History, to Hollymead Elementary School. This project, "Outdoor Classroom", focuses on developing and enhancing the delivery
of environmental education through gardening and landscaping. The Outdoor Classroom will serve as an outdoor science lab for teachers
and students. This project is designed to improve the teaching of elementary science to students through a hands-on approach to habitat
renewal, ecology, and organic gardening. It will lead to an increase in the children's familiarity with the natural world and greater
environmental consciousness by children, teachers, volunteers, and community members.
REC-OMMENDATlON:
Staff recommends approval of Appropriation # 940055 in the amount of $150.00 for the Gardening in Nature Grant.
"'-'1 n
;,
APP9455.WPD
95.056
5-'
i
.- -.
ALBEMARLE COUN1Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
FROM:
March 29, 1995
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executi~
Kevin Castner, Division superintende~
Request for Appropriation
DATE:
TO:
RE:
At its meeting on March 27, 1995 the School Board approved the
appropriation of a Gardening for Nature Grant for Hollymead Elementary School
in the amount of $150.00 from the Department of Natural Resources, Virginia
Museum of Natural History. This project, "Outdoor Classroom", focuses on
developing and enhancing the delivery of environmental education through
gardening and landscaping. The Outdoor Classroom will serve as an outdoor
science lab for teachers and students. This project is designed to improve
the teaching of elementary science to students through a hands-on approach to
habitat renewal, ecology, and organic gardening. It will lead to an increase
in the children's familiarity with the natural world and greater environmental
consciousness by children, teachers, volunteers, and community members.
It is requested that the Board of Supervisors amend the appropriation
ordinance to receive and disburse these funds as follows:
Revenue
2-3104-24000-240710
Gardening for Nature Grant
$150.00
Expenditure
1-3104-60205-600000
Miscellaneous Supplies
$150.00
/smm
xc: Jackson Zimmermann
Melvin Breeden
Ed Koonce
.......AUla Carey
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE '1-7'75
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Appropriation of Public Safety Grant
AGENDA DATE:
April 12, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
t¡.J., o,/r;t (S:/~)
ACflON:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Request approval of Appropriation #940056 in the amount of
$16,839 for a Virginia Connections - Traffic Unit Expansion Grant.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACflON:X
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Miller
REVIEWED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
The County of Albemarle has been experiencing rapid growth especially in the areas of retailing and residential development. This growth has
placed increasing demands on the County Police Department. Major areas of demand are traffic related. In 1992, a Traffic Unit was
established This grant will help expand the Unit to a more functional level by funding overtime for traffic checkpoints, selective enforcement,
and education operations.
DISCUSSION:
The overtime work to be perfonned by the County of Albemarle Police Department will be funded by this $16,839 Federal Grant. There are
no local matching requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of an Appropriation # 940056 in the amount of$16,839.
DMVTRAP.WP5
95.055
APR 1 1995
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martin
R ¡vanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
WhiteHall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scoltsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miner
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance
Ella W. Carey, Clerk [7 () ~
April 20, 1995
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Service Agreement - Crozet Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
At its meeting on April 12, 1995, the Board of Supervisors authorized
the Chairman to execute the attached Service Agreement with Crozet Volunteer
Fire Department, Inc.
EWC:mms
Attachment (1)
cc: Richard E. Huff, II
Carl Pumphrey
File
*
Printed on recycled paper
THIS SERVICE AGREEMENT, made for the purpose of identification
this /.:2i-h day of !}¡VL~! , 1995, by and between the COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE,
VIRGINIA (the "County") and the CROZET VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT, INC.
("Crozet")~
WIT N E SSE T H:
Background: (A) The County previously has entered into a service agreement with Crozet,
dated May 11, 1990, providing for the withholding of certain sums each year by the County from the
County's annual grant to Crozet, as set forth in said agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto
as Exhibit A~ and
(B) As a result of said agreement, the outstanding indebtedness now totals One Hundred
Eighteen Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($118,600.00)~ and
(C) Crozet now desires to receive ITom the County an additional One Hundred Thirty
Thousand Dollars ($130,000.00) to be used for a new pumper~ and
(D) Crozet also desires to enter into an agreement consolidating its annual withholdings of
payment by the County~
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the operation by Crozet of a volunteer fire
company which will fight fires and protect property and human life from loss or damage by fire during
the term of this agreement, the County shall pay to Crozet One Hundred Thirty Thousand Dollars
($130,000.00), which payment shall be made ITom the fire fund to be paid after execution of this
agreement.
The sum of Thirty-One Thousand and Seventy-Five Dollars ($31,075.00) shall be withheld
from the County's annual grant to Crozet for a period of eight (8) years beginning with fiscal year
1
1995-96 and ending in fiscal year 2002-03. Thus, at the end of the eighth year, which is the term of
this service agreement, a total of Two Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Six Hundred Dollars
($248,600.00) will have been withheld. This withholding consolidates the balance of all prior
advancements as a result of the prior service agreements with Crozet dated February 22, 1985, June
11, 1986, and May 11, 1990.
If at any time during the term of this agreement, Crozet is no longer in the business of
providing fire-fighting services or the pumper is no longer used for fire-fighting purposes, Crozet
covenants that it will convey its interest in the pumper to the County at no cost to the County so long
as the County or its assigns will use the pumper for fire-fighting purposes. Crozet further covenants
that it shall not convey the pumper or any interest therein to any party other than the County without
the County's prior written consent during the term of this agreement. A copy of the title to the
pumper shall be delivered to the County within 60 days of the purchase of the new pumper. All
covenants set forth in prior agreements not in conflict with this agreement remain in full force and
effect.
WITNESS the following signatures and seals:
COUNTY OF ALBEMARL~GINIA
By ({ )~ ::;- fr;(~seal)
Walter F. Perkins, Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
CROZET VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT, INC..
B~aNu{ Q~~
Presl ent
(Seal)
2
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I;¿'fil day of ({;Jk/ , 1995
by Walter F. Perkins, Chairman, Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginiá.
My Commission Expires:
;1,iLiLrK- ÚgJ¡ ? 0, ¡ 9 71
,
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this eX 1
by JjQJ)j(j"¿ {{/ mu t..''u , v1WuYJÆD
Fire Department, Inc. Ô
day of V) ¥':L:)~ , 1995
, Crozet Volunteer
LilA, ~ J /J QJ' '7
¡llÎ.l.ad~ :1 -
~L;) (7 ~.//IJJJ.í/Y"--;
No ry Public
My Commission Expires:
3
Exhibit A
THIS SERVICE AGREEMENT made this 11th day of ~ßY, 1990, by
and between THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), and
THE CROZET VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY, INC. ("Crozet")¡
WIT N E SSE T H :
Background: The County, by agreement dated June 11,
1986, gave Crozet $120,000 for a new pumper, which amount of
$68,700 is still owed. The County, by agreement dated February
22, 1985, gave Crozet $150,000 for the construction of a new fire
station, of which amount $75,000 is still owed the County.
Crozet needs an additional $167,000 for a new pumper. The
parties desire to consolidate all prior advancements at this
time.
Now therefore, for and in consideration of the premises and
the operation by Crozet of a volunteer fire company which will
fight fires and protect property and human life from loss or
damage by fire during the period of this agreement and the
purchase by Crozet of a new pumper for use during the period of
this agreement, the County shall advance to Crozet the sum of
$167,000, which shall be paid in July, 1990 from the County's
fire fund.
Therefore, beginning July, 1990 through July, 1997, amounts
will be withheld from the County's annual contribution to Crozet
as set forth in Schedule A attached hereto.
If at any time Crozet is no longer in the business of
providing fire fighting services, or the property upon which
Crozet's fire station is located, as described in Schedule B
attached hereto, is no longer used for the purpose of housing the
volunteer fire company, Crozet covenants that it will convey all
its fire fighting equipment of whatever nature and its interest
in the real property, described in Schedule B, including all
appurtenances thereto and improvements thereon, at no cost to the
County so long as the County, or its assigns will use these
properties for fire fighting purposes.
WITNESS the following signatures and seabs.
,,-/ æ & fA ~C C
County of Albemarle, Virginia
By Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Zl~
lerk. Board of superviS~ci;{ [
Crozet Volunteer
By President
Department, Inc.
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
The fO~:,9'oing w~s acknowledged before me this /lJ4¡ day of '-.Ii (..'- ^-'--
199 0, by ~/s.:;,v...1-..--
,r' /
:.... ì. I .
i f ,uL l-c' (, ':Â d_
- Notary Pub I ic
My Commission Expires:
\
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this 2/ day of~'-.::>,,",~
1990, by ~~ c...."'""'-c-.... ~ G. (V1 <..Glc::::,\-'-""'.',,,,.
~ \.--Ò~
Notary Publ ic
My Commission Expires: S-e..9~· \~ ,I..~"-:l.
SCHEDULE A
CROZET VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY
MONTH YR
JULY
JULY
JULY
JULY
JULY
JULY
JULY
JULY
REPAYMENT SCHEDULE
AMOUNT
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
$32,1.00
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
38,600
$310,700
,.
SCHEDULE B
Parcel 1
All that certain property conveyed to the Trustees of the Crozet
Volunteer Fire Company by deed from the Board of Supervisors of
Albemarle County dated March 25, 1964 and recorded in the Clerk's
office of the Circuit Court of said County in Deed Book 396, page 598.
By deed dated July 11, 1979, recorded in Deed Book 675, page 535, the
Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County conveyed to the Crozet
Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. the same property which it had
previously conveyed by said deed dated March 25, 1964, recorded in
Deed Book 396, page 598, to the Trustees of the Crozet Volunteer
Fire Company: Said second conveyance reserves a 25' right of way
on subject property.
Parcel 2:
All the certain lot or parcel of land in the village of Crozet
and described in a deed recorded in Albemarle County Deed Book 255,
page 285, as follows: Beginning in the center of the Crozet-White
Hall road a corner to C. L. Wayland, thence down south side of
branch S. 55 E. 76 feet to stake S. 68 E 44 feet to a stake and
---- - ----
---=--- -
. - .----------- .....- --. ----
S. 85 "E. 55 r:eet:.;to"-a-~-GrD,ero.f division fence; thence with it
...
S. 25 W.. 8~_.f~~.t to-a"::.comer-:-on north side of a reserved road
-_":":.. ._~. -----~. -- -
.
15 feet wide, between this lot and the barrel factory lot; thence
N. 67 W. 187 feet to the center of the County road and along same
90 feet to the beginning; being the property conveyed to the seller
by deed of Margaret L. Belew, widow, dated May 23, 1962 and recorded
in said Clerk's office in Deed Book 380, page 95.
'f., 7' 7S-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGF.NnA TlTI,F.:
Service Agreement with Crozet Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
AGF.NnA DATI<::
April 12, 1995
ITF.M NIJMRF.R:
1~-, (Jl.ft;J.(:¡' ~)
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SIJR F.CTIPROPOSAI JRF.QJJF.ST:
To authorize the Chairman to sign the service agreement with
Crozet Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. advancing $130,000 to
purchase a new pumper trock.
CONSF.NT AGF.NnA;
ACTION; X
INFORMATION:
A TT ACIIMF.NTS:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Pumphrey
RF.VIF.WF.DRV: ;<tJt-
RACKGROIJND:
Several years ago Albemarle County established a revolving fund to be used by the ten volunteer fire and rescue companies in the County.
This fund, currently funded at two million dollars, provides the volunteer companies a means of acquiring needed fire-fighting equipment
and buildings, interest free, with repayments being deducted from their annual County appropriation. Requests for disbursements from the
fund are monitored and approved by the Jefferson Country Fire and Rescue Association (JCFRA).
mscnSSION;
The current amount available for loan in the revolving fund is $231,838.63. Crozet Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. has requested, through
JCFRA, an advance of $130,000 to purchase a new pumper trock. This advance will be paid upon request after the execution of this
agreement. Repayment of the loan will be over an eight year period beginning FY 95/96.
JCFRA has approved this request.
RF.COMMF.NnA TION:
Staff recommends authorizing the Chairman to execute the service agreement.
CROZET
95.057
"
Ii
f"PR - 7 ,æ;
. ....--............-......
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
/
f' 7'75
r¡S,()~;J(~:tJ. )
MEMORANDUM
TO:
DATE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors ,
Roxanne W. White, Assistant County Executive f(JJJuJ I Jj"1Ýi
March 27, 1995
FROM:
RE:
Housing Coordinator
For your information, the new Housing Coordinator, Virginia McDonald, will begin work with the
County on April 17. Ms. McDonald has 22 years in the affordable housing field and has most
recently served as the Occupancy Coordinator for the Housing Opportunities Commission for
Montgomery County, Maryland. Prior to that, she served for 5 years as the first Housing
Coordinator for Prince William County and later as Chief of Housing.
In her position as Chief of Housing for Prince William County, she was responsible for taking a
Section 8 Rental Assistance Program within the Department of Social Services and developing it into
the County's first Housing Office/Division, which offered a full range of housing programs. She has
had experience in Section 8, Housing Rehabilitation programs, fair housing and homeless programs
and developed the first affordable housing section for Prince Wtlliam's Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
We are extremely pleased to have found a person of Ms. McDonald's experience and knowledge to
direct the County's Housing Office and hope you will have the opportunity to meet her soon.
RWW/dbm
95.038
,{7. 7:>-
9 ç, o<l/.;2. (S. 5)
,
....
..,.,....--.-""'".
(", (,71 \'"2 D,
! :
,jJ
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P O. BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902-2013
.. ~h'· ~ ".,..,,.-- '-'
A. G. TUCKER
RESIDENT ENGINEER
April 6, 1995
Route 643, Albemarle County
Between Routes 29 & 649
Ms. Ella Carey
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA. 22902
Dear Ms. Carey:
Route 643 between Route 29 and Route 649 will be closed to through traffic
from Monday, April 10, through Friday, April 14.
The Virginia Department of Transportation intends to install new drainage
pipe under a section of the road. The work zone is approximately one mile east
of the intersection with Route 29 and just west of the railroad tracks.
Attached is a sketch indicating the location of the work.
While the road is closed motorists having destinations west of the work zone
can continue to enter off Route 29. However, those motorists having destinations
east of the work zone should take Route 649 to Route 643 and then right onto
Route 643 to their destination.
Should you have any questions, please call this office.
~i r?/" ?1~'
. 1. Shldf:t, Jr.
I Maint. Oper. Mgr.
JHS/ldw
Attachments
cc: Mr. D. R. Askew
Mr. Bob Tucker, Bd. of Super.
Fire Department, Rescue Squad
Ch'ville. Post Office
County Police, State Police
Mr. J. R. Howe, S. C. Dean, Boyds Tavern HQ
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
I
,
I
: E,
I
I
1
I
1- _____ ------__J
I GI·~11
\.
-,
'<i>
... 1 ,. ~,...EºJ
,0..
.. ,
,~; ,
<'I 784 «
I ..
..
J~
.:h .. ~ ~
'~~.~
j;1()' ' '.~n....II. ~.~ ' L,non
_: LICK MOUNTAIN
--....- ~'r~....-. 601
--& .....-
~
GIBSON MOUNT AIN , 8!JCA<
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10 &Q I r
AT 661
t\t
~
c
o
(¡
~,o~ .
~~
"
. ¡' ~!
~ B
r
@Ill"
I
,
~ ,..------"'_-" I
.-'-"'~'-~
~r~ ~tJ' ,
J06i-~ ¡@
\1.--
\
!
I
\
\c. ~:
[giJV \' /'
.....-
(
r¡;¡¡-'~!
,- '/
-"
,...i
10
~-'
~
'~\ó,,\~
",®j
",
..
I6iõl
_ ~ 'Tt:-~_\
\ - ...
~.JillJ
[ill] \
,
"'---
".
.¡
~
644 (è,toÇ¡" 7r
. - ~"
, " Burnt.::
.~
. t..... 1310
. ti
i,.r".\tv,
<J
ç
!' "
~
-,
'!' ..
..
..
...
. ..
~"'''~
\
I
\
)
,
\
..
..
"-
tJ
.r
"-~
0::'
OJ
C'$o'-
.,
r
l' 7,9š'
15',ó_~1 :?(¿" )
Acme
Tel: 804-823-4351
Fax: 804-823-1625
Design Technology, Co.
1000 Allview Drive, Crozet, VA 22932
_·_'-·-"'~·""""_'''''_'''"h
i: rt: n~ __U___ w.
March 30, 1995
! ; APR - I 1995
..~~ I
J
~
·,...-........""S-···.,..-.:.i
,RD OF SUPER\+:-
~-~--
f -.~.__,_
Ms. Ella W. Carey
Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Ms. Carey:
The following is Acme Design Technology, Co.'s December 1994 operating results and
year-ending December 31, 1994 Financial Report:
Sales 8I Marketing
Our December bookings were ahead of our revised plan. Bookings were $775,380 vs. a
plan of $428,000. Note the next four charts for performance for the month, year-to-
date, 12 months 1993 vs. 12 months 1994, and 12 months 1992 vs. 12 months 1994.
DECEMBER 1994
Products Plan Actual Variance
DataVue $ 8,000 $ 4,040 ($ 3,960) (49.5%)
Visible Steel $ 55,000 $ 34,718 ($ 20,282) (36.9%)
Product SelVice $ 30,000 $ 12,564 ($ 17,436) (58.1 %)
Storage Products $225,000 $264,220 $ 39,220 17.4%
Freight/Miscellaneous $ 10,000 $ 12,258 $ 2,258 22.6%
OEM $100,000 $447,580 $347,580 347.6%
Totals $428,000 $775,380 $347,380 81.2%
DECEMBER 1994 YEAR-TO-DATE
Products Plan Actual Variance
DataVue $ 96,000 $ 64,859 ($ 31,141) (32.4%)
Visible Steel $ 930,000 $ 660,936 ($269,064) (28.9%)
Product SelVice $ 560,000 $ 440,734 ($119,266) (21.3%)
Storage Products $4,697,000 $3,843,617 ($853,383) (18.2%)
Freight/Miscellaneous $ 130,000 $ 199,306 $ 69,306 53.3%
OEM $1,285,000 $1,826,612 $541,612 42.2%
Totals $7,698,000 $7,036,064 ($661,936) (8.6%)
'3 r
12 MONTHS 1993 YS. 12 MONTHS 1994
Products 12 Mo. 1993 12 Mos. 1994 Variance
DataVue $ 81,559 $ 64,859 ($ 16,700) ( 20.5%)
Visible Steel $ 947,860 $ 660,936 ($ 286,924) ( 30.3%)
Product Service $ 532,727 $ 440,734 ($ 91,993) ( 17.3%)
Storage Products $3,473,660 $3,843,617 $ 369,957 10.7%
Freight/Miscellaneous $ 170,779 $ 199,306 $ 28,527 16.7%
OEM $ 704,886 $1,826,612 $ 1 , 1 2 1,726 159.1%
Totals $5,911,471 $7,036,064 $1,124,593 19.0%
Filing Supplies * $ 337,843
Total Adjustments $6,249,314 $7,036,064 $ 786,750 15.0%
*Purchased from S & W Manufacturing and prices were discounted 10% for our handling
of the paper. I do not believe we made anything on this and it was discontinued in May
1993.
12 MONTHS 1992 YS. 12 MONTHS 1994
Products 12 Mo. 1992 12 Mos. 1994 Variance
DataVue $ 95,888 $ 64,859 ($ 31,029) ( 32.4%)
Visible Steel $ 871,776 $ 660,936 ($ 210,840) ( 24.2%)
Product Service $ 404,938 $ 440,734 $ 35,796 8.8%
Storage Products $2,783,622 $3,843,617 $ 1,059,995 38.1%
Freight/Miscellaneous $ 159,788 $ 199,306 $ 39,518 24.7%
OEM $ 520,711 $1,826,612 $ 1,305,901 250.8%
Totals $4,836,723 $7,036,064 $2,199,341 45.5%
Filing Supplies * $ 1,270,249
Total Adjustments $6,106,972 $7,036,064 $ 929,092 15.2%
The following is our quote log for December and year-to-date:
Month
Total
Quotes
Received
QUOTE LOG SUMMARY
Total Quotes
Unworkable Workable Turned
Quotes Quotes Into PO's
Dates
PO's
Received
Dec. 94
65
5
60
7
I/Sept. 94
1/Nov. 94
5/Dec. 94
YTD 94:
879
41
838
129
15.4%
Our bookings for 1994 were 19% ahead of our 1993 performance. We had a terrible
start early 1994 but we ended very strong.
,
Manufacturing, Materials 8t Equipment
Our workload was much leveler in late 1994 than any time previous. With this happening,
I looked for marked improvement in efficiency and productivity. Our material flow was
much improved also. I am hopeful that after our supervision attend their training that was
scheduled for early 1995 we will see improvement in our factory performance.
Engineering 8t Quality
Our engineering workload remained high all year. I only see this increasing in 1995. We
are a custom manufacturer which requires engineering support. Acme has done little to
nothing over the past five years on new products or product improvements, and in 1995,
we must make a commitment to spending effort in this area.
I believe we can improve our outgoing quality. I do not believe it is a problem but I also
know it can be improved.
OEM
Our OEM business was very strong in 1994. We were above plan and the previous year's
performance. I do not have in place how we will accomplish our 1995 goals. I know that
our OEM business must grow for Acme to be a successful business.
Financials
Our over-90-day accounts decreased at year end:
Days:
0-30
31-60
61-90
91-999
Total
S
%
$468,095
39.1%
$455,679
38.1%
$91,588
7.7%
$180,851
15.1%
$1,196,213
100%
Note Attachment A for complete details of the major over-90-day accounts.
Other
Our objective for the Sales & Marketing organization is to get dealers to represent the
Acme line in markets in which we have no representation. We want and need only good
qualified dealers. We will then train their sales organization on the benefits of our products.
This is no small task, nor is it accomplished in one or two months. This is an ongoing
activity that will take time to show results.
Our strategic plan will be sent to you in the next week or so with our operating results for
both January and February 1995.
I would be interested in any comments you may have after you review our audited 1994
results.
Attached is a listing of our top 1994 customers. I find the list very interesting.
,
Also enclosed is our year ending headcount report.
Sincerely,
ACME DESIGN TECHNOLOGY, CO.
~Ll)dI/
Thomas D. Hall
President
ahd
Enclosures
\
9.
14.
15.
16.
1.
Absolute Filing Solutions
AITACHMENT A
December 31, 1994
$ 15,336
$ 10,520
$ 21,352
$ 3,448
$ 5,332
$ 64,239
$ 1 , 1 49
$ 5,428
$ 5,353
$ 11,446
$ 6,277
$ 26,449
$ 2,417
$ 3,074
$ 9,305
$ 1 7,269
$208,394
$ 180,851
Former master distributor.
Turned over to collection agency. Have personal
guarantee.
Has been turned over to a collection agency. Suit in
process.
Installation issues to be resolved.
Paid in early January 1995.
Judgment issued for Acme. Earning 10% interest.
Slow pay. Will work out.
Slow pay. Will work out.
Slow pay. Turned over to collection.
Have personal guarantee. Attorney is working on.
Seeking judgment.
$ 1000/month plus commissions. Will work out.
We have picked up product from this account that
has not been credited as yet. Will not cover total
due Acme.
Taxes; due for various states.
Slow pay. Working out with an attorney on
collections.
Judgment issued for $ 1 6/000.
Acme has been paid for this product. This is
installation money that will be passed on to our
dealer when complete and collected.
115%
100%
Note: Grand Total is less than Sub Total because of over payments by other accounts and credits
that have not been applied.
2.
Alpha Systems
3.
Commercial Products Co.
4.
Dormitory Authority
5.
Furniture Consultants
6.
Hagiazo-Systematic Storage
7.
Innovative Business Systems
8.
Island Filing Systems
LFl Associates
10.
Medical Forms & Equipment
11.
New England Visible
12.
Osborne Office Systems
13.
Remstar International
SES Contract
Star Production Services
Turner Construction Co.
Sub Total:
Grand Total:
ACME'S TOP 1994 CUSTOMERS
Plug-In Storage Systems, Connecticut & VA (OEM)
A VR Filing & Storage Systems, Chantilly, VA
KMA & Associates, OH & PA
Inova Corporation, Charlottesville, VA (OEM)
Convert-A-File, Long Island, NY
Acme Business Systems, Schenectady, NY
Business Products & Design, Monroe, LA
A VR Business Systems, Inc., Pottstown, P A
Figgie Fire Protection Systems, Charlottesville, VA (OEM)
Fens Associates, Groveland, MA
Hagerty-Major Associates (Pacific Government Sales), CA
Acme Office Systems, Canton, MA
Business Technologies, Chesapeake, VA
Remstar, Westbrooke, ME (OEM)
A VCO Business Systems, Newport Richey, FL
Total Sales:
Sales of Top 1 5 Accounts:
OEM Sales:
Storage Products:
$6,183,024.79
$2,757,639.40 (44.6% of Total Sales)
$1,004,224.60
$1,753,414.80
Acme
Tel: 804-823-4351
Fax: 804-823-1625
Design Technology, Co.
1000 Allview Drive, Crozet, VA 22932
TO: T. HALL
FROM: K. LANDES
RE: HEADCOUNT FOR YEAR-END 1994
SALARIED FULL-TIME: 35
SALARIED PART-TIME: 1
HOURLY FULL-TIME: 57
HOURLY PART-TIME: 1
HOURLY TEMPORARIES: 8
TOTAL: 102
· .
ACME DESIGN TECHNOLOGY, CO.
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
Pursuant to the Security Agreement dated as of January 28, 1993, and as
amended as of August 19, 1994 (the "Agreement") between ACME DESIGN
TECHNOLOGY, CO., (the "Company") and NATIONSBANK OF VIRGINIA,
N .A, the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies as follows:
1. The Company is in compliance with all terms, covenants, and
conditions of the Agreement that are binding upon the Company.
Compliance with the financial covenants as of the statement dated
December 31, 1994 is outlined below:
(a) Quick Ratio. Maintain a ratio of (i) cash plus accounts
receivable to (ü) Current Liabilities of not less than 1.0 to 1.0 as
of the end of the Fiscal Month ending July 31, 1994, and at all
times thereafter.
Cash
Accounts Receivable
Total
$ 39.674
+ 1,043,213
$ 1.082.887
Current Liabilities
$ 1. 024.563
Ratio:
1.06
(b) Current Ratio. Maintain a ratio of Current Assets to Current
Liabilities of not less than 1.9 to 1.0 as of the end of the Fiscal
Month ending July 31, 1994, and at all times thereafter.
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
$2,227,296
$1.024.563
Ratio:
2.17
(c) Leverage Ratio. Maintain a ratio of Senior Indebtedness
to Adjusted Tangible Net Worth as of the last day of each
Fiscal Quarter, of not more than the ratio set forth opposite
such Fiscal Quarter.
Fiscal Quarter Ending
Ratio
9/30/94
12/31/94
3/31/95
3.25 to 1.0
3.25 to 1.0
3.00 to 1.0
lob \¡:word\il,m \mi øc \acmo.cc
11/1104 11:30 AM
6/30/95
9/30/95
12/31/95
3/31/96 and each
Fiscal Quarter end
thereafter
Total Liabilities
Subordinated Debt
Total
Net Worth
Intangibles
Subordinated Debt
Adj. Tang. Net Worth
Ratio:
2.75 to 1.0
2.50 to 1.0
2.25 to 1.0
2.0 to 1.0
$2.364.500
- 400.000
$1.964,500
$ 346,873
- 91. 913
+ 400,000
$ 654.960
3.00
(d) Debt Service Ratio. Not permit its Debt Service Ratio for any
period set forth below, ending on the last day of each Fiscal
Quarter to be less than the ratio set forth opposite such period:
Applicable Period
7/1/94 to 12/31/94
1/1/95 to 3/31/95
1/1/95 to 6/30/95
1/1/95 to 9/30/95
1/1/95 to 12/31/95
1/1/96 to 3/31/96 and each
respective 6-Fiscal Month,
9-Fiscal Month, 12-Fiscal
Month and 3-Fiscal-Month
Period thereafter beginning
on the first day of the Fiscal
Year and ending on the last
day of each Fiscal Quarter
Net Income
Depreciation & Amort.
Other Noncash Charges
Other Noncash Credits
Cash Flow
Ratio
1.0 to 1.0
1.0 to 1.0
1.15 to 1.0
1.30 to 1.0
1.30 to 1.0
$ 86,377
+48.810
+ 1.214
(7/1/94 - 12/31/94)
$136,401
lab \g:word\ hm\mi IIC 'acmo.oc
11/1194 11:30 AM
CMLTD
Cap. Lease Pymts
Fixed Charges
$ 132.847
+ 3,824
$136.671
Ratio:
.998
(e) Cavital Exuenditures. Not make or permit any Subsidiary to
make Consolidated Capital Expenditures at any time during the
respective applicable periods set forth below, if the Consolidated
Capital Expenditures would exceed the amount set forth
opposite each such applicable period.
Atmlicable Period
1/1/94 - 12/31/94 and
each calendar year
thereafter
Amount
$50,000
Applicable Period: 1/1/94 - 12/31/94
Net Fixed Assets at start of period:
Net Fixed Assets at end of period:
Depreciation changed during period:
Capital Expenditures during period
$ 443.824
-371.205
+ 75.775
$ 3,156
(f) Tangible Net Worth. Maintain a Tangible Net Worth as of
September 30, 1994 and December 31, 1994, of not less than the
amount set forth opposite such date.
Date
September 30, 1994
December31, 1994
Reauired
$199,000
$249,000
Actual
$ 199 ,042
$ 254.960
2. The representations and warranties of the Company set forth in the
Agreement and all representations and warranties which are
contained in any certificate, document, or financial or other statement
furnished pursuant to or in connection with the Agreement are true
and correct on and as of the date hereof with the same effect as if made
on the date hereof.
lab \g:word\jl,m \miøc \acme.co
11/1/1143:01 PM
3. The Borrowing Base (as defined in the Agreement) as of
December 31, 1994 calculated in accordance with the
Agreement, is shown on the Schedule annexed hereto and the
Borrowing Base is equal to or exceeds to aggregate principal amount of
the Term Loan outstanding to the Company pursuant to the
Agreement. C ~~. dl
Thomas D. Hall
Title: Pres i dent
Dated: March 23, 1995
lab \¡¡:word\jhm \millC\acmo.oo
11/1104 11:30 AM
ACME DESIGN TECHNqLOGY, CO.
Schedule to Borrowing Base Certificate
computations are as of 12/31/94
I. COMPUTATION O~' NET SECURITY
VALUE OF INVENTORY
INVENTORY (valued at lower
of cost or FMV at FIFO)
$ 903,û65.27
LESS:
Inventory charged off
or written down as
unsaleable
$(
)
Other unqualified
Inventory
$(
$ 903,065.27
ELIGIBLE INVENTORY
x
.50
NET SECURITY VALUE - INVENTORY
$ 451,532.64
II. COMPUTATION OF NET SECURITY
VALUE OF ACCOUNTS
TOTAL ACCOUNTS $1,196,213.21
LESS:
Affiliate or Employee
Accounts $( )
Accounts not Invoiced $( )
Accounts more than 90
days past due $ ( 234,920.08 )
Disputed Accounts $( )
Insolvent Debtor Accounts $( )
Foreign Accounts $( )
Consignment Accounts $( )
Government Accounts $(
Unshipped Accounts $(
. Other unqualified
Accounts $(
ELIGIBLE ACCOUNTS $ 961,293.13
x .75
NET SECURITY VALUE - ACCOUNTS $ 720,969.85
III. BORROWING BASE VALUE
Net Security Value - Inventory
Net Security Value - ~ccounts
Total Net Security Value
$ 451.532.64
$ 720.969.85
$1,172,502.49
("7-
J
b
Page
,
03/03/95 8:33 9 massie Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
For Periods Ending DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
BALANCE SHEET
This Period Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Description Balance Balance Last Period This Period Last Year
------------------------ ----------- --- ---------- ----------- .---------- ---------------
CURRENT ASSETS
CASH 39,673.75 79,939.09 (40,265.34 (53,787.10 93,460.85
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
INSTALLMENT RECEIVABLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - CUST 196,213.21 405,017.37 208,804.16 278,651.92 (82,438.71
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - GOVT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
RESERVE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCTS 153,000.00) (146,041.52 (6,958.48 150,000.00 (3,000.00
RESERVE FOR EST CREDIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE CONTRA 0.00 (7,236.44 7,236.44 ( 14, 1 08.57 14,108.57
--- ----------- --------------- .---------- ---------- ---------------
TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 043,213.21 1,251,739.41 208,526.20 114,543.35 (71,330.14
INVENTORY
FINISHED GOODS 198,942.02 183,420.55 15,521.47 131,760.02 67,182.00
FINISHED PARTS 402,908.98 401,838.68 1,070.30 383,621.00 19,287.98
!JORK IN PROCESS 131,716.13 195,173.67 (63,457.54 178,022.69 (46,306.56
RA!J MATERIALS 301,214.27 294,042.20 7,172.07 271,505.64 29,708.63
FACTORY SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CAPITALIZED INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
INVENTORY CONTRA ACCOUNT 0.00 (87,945.75 87,945.75 (87,945.75 87,945.75
--- ---------- --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------------
TOTAL INVENTORY 034,781.40 986,529.35 48,252.05 876,963.60 157,817 .80
OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
ADVACES TO EMPLOYEES 2,000.00 1,950.00 50.00 3,000.00 (1,000.00
TRANSPORTATION CLAIMS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER RECEIVABLES 41,627.33 44,710.89 (3,083.56 43,518.78 (1,891.45
NOTE RECV - RELATED PARTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
NOTE RECV - CUSTOMER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
NOTE RECV - EHPLOYEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
INTEREST RECV-RELATED PRTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 66,000.00 66,000.00 0.00 0.00 66,000.00
--- ---------- --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------------
TOTAL OTHER CURRENT ASSETS 109,627.33 112,660.89 (3,033.56 46,518.78 63.108.55
--- ---------- --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 2,227.295.69 2,430,868.74 203,573.05 984,238.63 243.057.06
2
\,.
Page
03/03/95 8:35:25 massie Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
For Periods Ending DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co.
BALANCE SHEET
This Period Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Description Balance Balance Last Period This Period Last Year
------------------------. ----------- --- ---------- .---------- ---------------- ----------------
NOTES RECV - RELÀTED PARTIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT
LAND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
IMPROVEMENTS TO LAND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
BUILDINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS 5.000.00 5.000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 454,012.55 452,956.55 1,116.00 451,662.98 2,409.51
FURN, FIXT & OFF MACHINES 34,840.61 34,840.61 0.00 34,094.00 146.61
EQUIP. UNDER CAPITAL LEASES 25,000.00 25.000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00
TRUCKS & AUTOS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CONSTRUCTION IN PROCESS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
----------- --- ---------- ,---------- ------------ ----------
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS - COST 518.913.22 511,191.22 1.116.00 515,156.98 3,156.24
ALLO~ANCE FOR DEPRECIATION 141,101.96) ( 141 ,226.92 (6,481.04 <71,932.53 (15,115.43
----------- --------------- ---------- ------------ ----------
NET FIXED ASSETS 311,205.26 316,510.30 (5,365.04 443,824.45 (12.619.19
OTHER ASSETS
PREPAID INSURANCE 8,960.00 6,312.83 2,581.11 1,009.80 1,950.20
PREPAID RENT 12,000.00 1,111.51 4,228.49 11,854.84 (5,854.84
OTHER PREPAID EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.832.84 <7,832.84
PATENTS LESS AMORTIZATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
DEFERRED ORGANIZATION EXPENS 11,450.59 66,192.14 5,258.45 88,655.51 ( 11,204.98
OTHER DEFERRED EXPENSES 20,462.04 24,962.63 (4,500.59 21,282.12 (6,820.68
--- ---------- ------------ - ---------- ------------ ---------
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 112,812.63 105,299 1 1,513.52 142,635.11 29,163.14
--- - ------ ------------ - -- ------ ------------ ---------
TOTAL ASSETS 2,1 313.58 2,912,138 5 20 364,51 2,510,698.85 4~,614.13
...
3
Page
Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
For Periods Ending DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
BALANCE SHEET
Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Balance Last Period This Period Last Year
---------- .----------- ----------- ---------------
641,324.64 (155,845.49 297,543.77 187,935.38
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.07 (0.07 0.00 0.00
406.80 2,569.86 607.41 2,369.25
0.00 19,069.71 0.00 19,069.71
28,532.67 6,499.52 34,361.69 670.50
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
---------- ----------- .---------- ---------------
670,264.18 (127,706.47 332,512.87 210,044.84
62,331.26 (37,210.27 26,457.39 (1,336.40
94,820.24 (27,577.59 73,484.83 ( 6 , 242 . 18
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
63,744.42 (18,237.27 15,952~05 29,555.10
12,798.15 8,336.05 6,560.64 14,573.56
16,491.43 8,060.64 19,456.71 5,095.36
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------------
250,185.50 (66,628.44 141,911.62 41,645.44
180,000.00 0.00 165,000.00 15,000.00
8,421.72 50.07 7,397.70 1,074.09
89,491.37 20,484.74 84,328.47 25,647.64
---------- ----------- ---------- ..--------------
277,913.09 20,534.81 256.726. 17 41 ,721 .73
--------- -------- - -- ----- .-------------
98,362.17 (173.800 0 73 50.66 293,412.0
This Period
Balance
----------
485,479.15
0.00
0.00
2,976.66
19,069.71
35,032.19
0.00
0.00
----------
542,557.71
25,120.99
67,242.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
45,507.15
21,134.20
24,552.07
----------
183,557.06
180,000.00
8,471.79
109,976.11
----------
298,447.90
----------
024.562.67
03/03/95 8:36:04 maS51e
Description
------------------------.
CURRENT LIABILITIES
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
TRADE PAYABLES
PAYROLL U.H. FEDERAL
PAYROLL U.H. STATE & LOCAL
SALES TAX
OTHER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
DEFERRED INCOME - SERVICE
DEFERRED INCOME - PENSION
DEFERRED INCOME - OTHER
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCRUED EXPENSES
SALARIES & UAGES
COMMISSIONS
PENSIONS/PROFIT SHARING
FEDERAL INCOME TAX
STATE & CITY INCOME TAXES
TAXES - OTHER
INTEREST
OTHER ACCRUED EXPENSES
TOTAL ACCRUED EXPENSES
CURRENT PORTION LTD
BANKS
OBLIGATIONS-CAPITAL LEASES
NOTES PAYABLE-OTHER CURRENT
TOTAL CURRENT LTD
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
"
4
Page
03/03/95 8:37:22 mass1e Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
For Periods Ending DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co.
BALANCE SHEET
This Period Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Description Balance Balance Last Period This Period Last Year
------------------------. ----------- --. ---------- .---------- .------------ ----------------
LONG TERM DEBT
NATIONS BANK - NOTE #1 FIXED 131,408.23 131,408.23 0.00 146,408.23 (15,000.00)
NATIONS BANK - NOTE #2 LINE 210,000.00 225,000.00 (15,000.00 375,000.00 (165,000.00)
VA. ECONOMIC DEV. AUT.-VRLF 485,537.39 493,260.17 (7,722.78 575,513.50 (89,976.11)
VEDCORP INC. 380,000.00 400,000.00 (20,000.00 400,000.00 (20,000.00)
OBLIGATIONS-CAPITAL LEASES 7,992.14 7,719.91 272.23 16,463.93 (8,471.79)
NOTES PAYABLE-OTHER LONG TERM 125,000.00 0.00 125,000.00 0.00 25,000.00
--- ----------- --- ---------- .---------- .------------ ,---------
TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 339,937.76 e57,388.31 82,549.45 1,513,385.66 73,447.90
DEFERRED INCOME TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CAP IT AL
COMMON STOCK 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00
DEBENTURES PAYABLE 0.00 125,000.00 125,000.00 0.00 0.00
PAID IN SURPLUS 480,000.00 480,000.00 0.00 480,000.00 0.00
--- ---------- --- ---------- ---------- ------------ ---------
500,000.00 625,000.00 125,000.00 500,000.00 0.00
RETAINED EARNINGS-BEGIN PERIOD 107,837.47 107,837.47 0.00 0.00 07,837.47
NET INCOME (45,289.38 (60,175.46 14,886.08 (173,837.47 28,548.09
--- ---------- --- ---------- ---------- ------------ ---------
TOTAL CAP ITAL 346.873.15 456,987.07 110.113.92 326,162.53 20,710.62
--- - ------ ------------ - -- ------ ------------ ---------
TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY 2,7 373.58 2,912,738 5 20 364.57 2,570,698.85 40.674.73
03/02/95 3:08:4 maSSle Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co.
INCOME STATEMENT
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to
Description Current Period Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Year
---------------- ------ --------------- ---- -- ---- ------------ ---- ---------- -----
GROSS SALES 6,002,734.00 (103.02 0.00 6,002,734.00 0.00 6,314,167.82 4.93
RETURNS & ALLOWANCES 58,885.91 ( 1 .01 0.00 58,885.91 0.00 83,421 .94 29.41
COMMISSIONS 116,951.53 (2.01 0.00 116,951.53 0.00 222,022.91 47.32
--------------- --------- ---- ------------ ---- ------------ -----
NET SALES 5,826,896.56 ( 100.00 0.00 5,826,896.56 0.00 6,008,722.97 3.03
COST OF GOODS SOLD 4,895,319.90 (84.01 0.00 4,895,319.90 0.00 5,076,494.67 (3.57
-- ---------- ---- ---- ---------- ---- ----------- -----
GROSS PROFIT 931,576.66 5.99 0.00 931,576.66 0.00 932,228.30 0.07
SALES, MARKETING, & ADVRTISING 401,300.59 6.89 0.00 401,300.59 0.00 416,467.74 (3.64
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 515,562.66 8.85 0.00 515,562.66 0.00 601,788.69 14.33
INCENTIVES & PROFIT SHARING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
---------- ---- ---- ---------- ---- ---------- -----
OPERATING EXPENSES 916,863.25 5.74 0.00 916,863.25 0.00 018,256.43 (9.96
--------- ---- ---- --------- ---- --------- -----
NET OPERATING INCOME 14,713.41 0.25 0.00 14,713.41 0.00 86,028.13 17 _ 10
INTEREST EXPENSE 46,650.39 2.52 0.00 46,650.39 0.00 22,759.11 19.46
OTHER INCOME OR EXPENSE 86,647.60 1.49 0.00 86,647.60 0.00 33,463.08 35.08
INCOME TAXES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
--------- ---- ---- --------- ---- ------ - -----
ET NCOME 45,289.38 0.78 0.00 45,289.38 0.00 75,324 6 39.87
2
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
e
55 mass
3
03/02/95
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
4.93
29.41
47.32
82
94
91
167
421
022
314
83
222
6
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
002,734.00
58,885.91
16,951.53
6
Period
Budget
00
00
00
o
o
o
Current
Pct
02
01
01
03
11
12
Period
002,734.00
58,885.91
16,951.53
Current
6
Description
-----------
GROSS SALES
RETURNS & ALLOWANCES
COMMISSIONS
03
00
84
60
69
75
3
00
11
4
2
9
97
948.36
688.01
191.28
681.76
471.42
008,722
,
,
,
,
,
448
1,598
2,174
207
254
6
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
56
0.00
1,569,277.58
2,274,137.33
202,096.81
204,203.46
896
5,826
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
)
)
)
)
00
0.00
26.93
39.03
13.47
13,50
00
56
0.00
277.58
137.33
096.81
203.46
896
5,826
1,569
2,274
202
204
NET SALES
PURCHASED FOR RESALE-COST
MATERIALS
FACTORY BURDEN
PRODUCT BURDEN
INSTALLATION COSTS
9.27
83
980
683
4
00
o
8
715
4,249
00
o
93
72
8
715
249
4
COST OF GOODS SOLD
06
25.09
8.13
303.46
0.00
35.80
0.00
71. 27
0.00
9
4
803.17
576.43
246.73
0.00
659.63
0.00
452.86
0.00
324,742
595
23
68
5
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
38
308.89
492.35
350.02
0.00
265.68
0.00
280.86
0.00
8
577
446
25
275
2
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
07
66
44
73
00
36
00
38
00
27
7
o
4
o
o
o
1
o
38
308.89
492.35
350.02
0.00
265.68
0.00
280.86
0.00
8
577
446
25
275
2
GROSS MARGIN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
PURCHASED MATERIAL VARIANCE
VARIANCE TO STANDARD
DISCOUNT ALLOCATION
SCRAP SALES
INTERIM INVENTORY ADJUSTHENT
PHYSICAL INVENTORY ADJUSTHENT
CAPITALIZED INVY INDIRECT COST
279
80
80
64.48
07
o
392,513.84
932,228.30
00
00
o
o
645,604.72
576.66
93
00
00
o
o
08
99
5
604.72
576.66
645
93
TOTAL OTHER FACTORY EXPENSES
GROSS PROFIT
3
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
07 massie
3
3
03/02/95
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
Variance
Percent
0.00
Variance
to Budget
--------
666,419.60
Period
Budget
0.00
Current
Pct
Period
Current
9.6
6.48
(1.65
59.77
7.80
(1. 21
1.30
0.00
00.00
22.50
62.42
73.53
12.78
(3.41
(1.34
0.48
21.86
75.21
39.07
22.85
0.00
0.00
11.82
0.00
22.58
826.49
737,295.22
524.74
984.59
131. 15
022.10
815.70
784.51
0.00
91.50
478.55
263.71
025.72
266.83
807.44
689.47
262.31
873.52
479.67
830.22
390.70
0.00
0.00
934.13
0.00
339.23
922.63
,
,
,
·
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
·
,
,
·
451
241
70
85
65
51
53
58
50
86
87
30
309
6
13
95
18
9
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
779.56
986.13
051.80
652.60
815.57
764.84
0.00
0.00
009.01
896.31
339.38
293.23
816.88
278.69
733.31
370.97
342. 17
271,53
592.16
0.00
0.00
108.46
0.00
487.77
232.58
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
480
237
112
91
63
53
88
21
260
97
84
30
310
5
3
33
22
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
44
25
08
92
57
81
64
00
00
23
38
47
67
46
52
33
09
06
29
39
00
00
19
00
40
36
8
4
1
1
2
2
o
o
3
o
4
1
1
o
5
o
o
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
60
779.56
986.13
051.80
652.60
815.57
764.84
0.00
0.00
009.01
896.31
339.38
293.23
816.88
278.69
733.31
370.97
342.17
271.53
592.16
0.00
0.00
108.46
0.00
487,77
232.58
9
4
·
,
,
,
,
·
,
·
,
,
,
,
·
,
,
·
,
666
480
237
112
91
63
53
88
21
260
97
84
30
310
5
3
33
22
Description
-----------
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
UARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES AND ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
30
2
23
21
23
21
62
8
42
8
9,9
2,2
00
o
357.79
2,4
00
o
38
4
357.79
2,4
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
08
4
64
957,213
2
00
o
077,777.39
3
00
o
52.82
077,777.39
3
ACTUAL BURDEN
44
09
25
47
7
o
595,803
4
2.36
00
00
o
o
468.50
308.89
63
446
2
00
00
o
o
6
66
45
7
2,631,468.50
----------------
446,308.89
APPLIED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
Year Page 4 ..
.
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
23 massie
4
3
03/02/95
Variance
Percent
Variance
to Budget
Period
Budget
Current
0.00
22.89
(90.70
226.32
0.00
0.00
(6.82
0.00
(1.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
14.59
69.38
0.00
00.64
0.00
90.42
(1.18
0.00
16.16
3.53
19.05
15.22
44.88
92.35
0.00
0.00
42.83
3.64
00
88
52
47
00
00
54
00
60
00
00
00
00
19
00
00
24
00
71
61
00
44
96
00
22
43
47
28
00
18
74
O.
999.
113.
116.
O.
O.
797.
O.
344.
O.
o
o
o
145
000
o
989
o
762
161
o
878
425
63
375
359
203
435
o
296
467
41
85
67
12
6
7
2
46
4
1
3
2
2
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
253.11
615.28
208.28
380.06
0.00
0.00
310.13
0.00
138.56
0.00
555.82
0.00
0.00
944.10
674.96
0.00
029.55
0.00
264.54
617.15
0.00
090.02
476.36
75.00
959.73
880.16
245.00
435.28
0.00
47.50
36
51
17
20
6
76
3
45
2
6
4
1
2
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Pct
34)
89)
30)
01 )
00
00
35
00
28
00
03
00
00
32
06
00
28
00
00
78
00
07
03
00
05
02
00
04
00
05
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
6
(
(
(
(
Per10d
253.11
615.28
208.28
380.06
0.00
0.00
310.13
0.00
138.56
0.00
555.82
0.00
0.00
944.10
674.96
0.00
029.55
0.00
264.54
617.15
0.00
090.02
476.36
75.00
959.73
880.16
245.00
435.28
0.00
47.50
Current
36
51
17
20
6
76
3
45
6
4
I
2
2
.
Descript10n
-----------
SALES, MARKETING & ADVERTISING
SALARIES - MANAGEMENT
SALARIES - SALESMEN
SALARIES - CLERICAL
OVERTIME PREMIUM
INCENTIVES & AWARDS
VACATIONS & HOLIDAYS
PAYROLL TAXES
PENSIONS
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
SALES RECRUITMENT
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
OUTSIDE MANPOWER
MARKET RESEARCH
PROMOTION
MEETINGS & SEMINARS
ADVERTISING - DIRECTORY
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
RENT - BUILDING
POSTAGE
TELEPHONE
OTHER UTILITIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
INSURANCE - GENERAL
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENT - EOUIPMENT
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
DEPRECIATION
TAXES R/E & PIP
MISCELLANEOUS
6
4
00
o
59
300
3
40
00
o
89
59
300
3
40
TOTAL EXPENSE
5
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
4:53 maSSle
3
03/02/95
~
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
Variance
Percent
Variance
to Budget
Period
Budget
Current
)
)
)
)
0.00
43.81
45.65
(7.90
(1.26
0.00
81.19
38.11
58.78
4.38
94.24
43.75
70.93
1.91
40.56
31.90
2.18
9.38
0.00
(28.03
390.44
0.00
957.69
0.00
94.32
0.00
0.00
123.51
134.00
243.25
591.33
0.00
557.73
805.58
629.25
435.28
281.02
240.00
665.58
400.67
706.72
920.83
151.31
610.80
0.00
246.30
486.23
0.00
78.00
0.00
481.30
0.00
·
,
,
·
,
,
,
·
·
,
,
297
1
24
18
6
75
6
2
9
2
8
5
1
17
46
3
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
16
32
28
31
84
00
40
78
85
94
22
00
84
67
44
53
16
19
00
93
98
00
00
00
82
00
000
966
616
328
357
o
233
913
732
541
308
135
221
752
335
533
525
984
o
533
246
o
825
o
469
o
.
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
00
66
22
18
1
46
2
2
27
7
8
9
2
17
50
9
7
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Pct
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
72
87
01
38
32
00
02
81
05
04
47
00
12
32
16
04
30
87
00
16
12
00
01
00
04
00
1
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
8
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Period
000.16
966.32
616.28
328.31
357.84
0.00
233.40
913.78
732.85
541.94
308.22
135.00
221.84
752.67
335.44
533.53
525. 1 6
984.19
0.00
533.93
246.98
0.00
825.00
0.00
469.82
0.00
Current
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
00
66
22
18
1
46
2
2
27
7
18
9
2
17
50
9
7
Description
-----------
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER'S SALARIES
OFFICE SALARIES
OVERTIME PREMIUM
PAYROLL TAXES
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE EXPENSES
LEGAL & AUDIT
OFFICE EXPENSES
DEPRECIATION
INSURANCE - GENERAL
TAXES. FRANCHISES & LICENSES
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
TELEPHONE
OFF ICE SUPPLI ES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF AUTOS
POSTAGE
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
BUILDING OCCUPANCY
DONATIONS
DIRECTORS FEES
BAD DEBT EXPENSE
CHARGE TO ACME SEELY
4.33
69
788
43
60
00
o
66
2
515,562
00
o
85
66
2
515.562
TOTAL EXPENSES
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page 6
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co.
INCOME STATEMENT ..
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to
Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Year
-- ---- ,---------- ---- ,--------- -----
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.97 0.00 56,699.13 0.00 39,854.37 42.27
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.54 0.00 89,951.26 0.00 82,904.74 8.50
---- ---- ---------- ---- --------- -----
2.52 0.00 46,650.39 0.00 22,759.11 19.46
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.01 0.00 (401.51 0.00 (583.32 31.17
0.01 0.00 (304.43 0.00 (644.44 52.76
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.64 0.00 95,545.90 0.00 48,400.00 97.41
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.11 0.00 6,417.24 0.00 8,604.73 25.42
0.13 0.00 7,529.97 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.07 0,00 (4,342.97 0.00 92,440.05 95.30
--- ---- --------- ---- --------- -----
.49 0.00 86,647.60 0.00 33.463.08 35.08
03/02195 3 5 2 maSSle
Description Current Period
-----------. -. -------- -- .---------
INTEREST EXPENSE
INTEREST EXPENSE PARENT 0.00
INTEREST EXPENSE - VISA 0.00
INTEREST EXPENSE BANKS 56,699.13
INTEREST EXPENSE CAPTL LEASE 0.00
OTHER INTEREST EXPENSE 89.951. 26
---------
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE 46,650.39
OTHER INCOME & EXPENSE
INTEREST INCOME PARENT 0.00
INTEREST INCOME MONEY MARKET (401.51
INTEREST INCOME OTHER (304.43
CAP ITAL GAINS 0.00
CAP IT AL LOSSES 0.00
RENTAL INCOME 95,545.90
INVESTMENT EXPENSE 0.00
BANK FEES 6,417.24
RESTRUCTURING EXPENSE 7,529.97
MISCELLANEOUS (4,342.97
---------
TOTAL OTHER NCOME & EXPENSE 86,647.60
03/02/95 2:59:05 maSSle Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page
For periods DECEMBER 1994 thru DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology CO.
INCOME STATEMENT
~
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to
Description Current Period Budget Percent This Period Last Year ,
Pct to Budget .
------------------------ -- ---------- ---- -- ---- ---------- ---- ------------ -----
GROSS SALES 474.829.36 (101.89 0.00 474,829.36 0.00 323,375.83 46.84
RETURNS & ALLOWANCES 4,691.44 (1.01 0.00 4,691.44 0.00 10,708.59 56.19
COMMISSIONS 4,099.71 (0.88 0.00 4,099.71 0.00 (24,518.49 16.72
-- ---------- --------- ---- ---------- ---- ------------ -----
NET SALES 466.038.21 ( 1 00.00 0.00 466,038.21 0.00 337,185.73 38.21
COST OF GOODS SOLD 340,224.13 <73.00 0.00 340,224.13 0.00 121,845.11 79.23
-- --------- --------- ---- --------- ---- ---------- -----
GROSS PROFIT 25,814.08 (27.00 0.00 25,814.08 0.00 215,340.62 41.57
SALES, MARKETING, & ADVRTISING 65,973.19 (14.16 0.00 65,973.19 0.00 39,798.59 65.77
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 30,979.36 (6.65 0.00 30,979.36 0.00 96,316.44 67.84
INCENTIVES & PROFIT SHARING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
--------- --------- ---- --------- ---- --------- -----
OPERATING EXPENSES 96,952.55 (20.80 0.00 96,952.55 0.00 36,115.03 28.77
--------- ---- ---- --------- ---- --------- -----
tŒT OPERATING INCOME 28.861.53 6.19 0.00 28,861.53 0.00 79,225.59 63.57
INTEREST EXPENSE 20,197.49 4.33 0.00 20,197.49 0,00 10,926.60 84.85
OTHER INCOME OR EXPENSE (6,222.04 1.34 0.00 ('6,222.04 0.00 92,884.95 93.30
INCOME TAXES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-------- - - ---- -------- ---- - ----- -----
ET NCOHE 4,886.08 3 9 0.00 4,886.08 0.00 6 83.94 90.7&
03/02/95 2:59:2 massie Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page 2
For periods DECEMBER 1994 thru DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co.
INCOME STATEMENT
I
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to
Description Current Period Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Year '~
----------------. ------ -- ---------- ---- --- ---- ---------- ---- ------------ ------
GROSS SALES 474,829.36 (101.89 ) 0.00 474,829.36 0.00 323,375.83 (46.84
RETURNS & ALLOWANCES 4,691.44 (1. 01) 0.00 4,691.44 0.00 10,708.59 (56.19
COMMISSIONS 4,099.71 (0.88) 0.00 4,099.71 0.00 (24,518.49 116.72
-- ---------- ---------- ---- ---------- ---- ------------ ------
NET SALES 466,038.21 ( 1 00.00) 0.00 466,038.21 0.00 337,185.73 (38.21
PURCHASED FOR RESALE-COST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MATERIALS 154,022.08 (33.05) 0.00 154,022.08 0.00 117,236.48 31.38
FACTORY BURDEN 195,450.84 (41.94) 0.00 195,450.84 0.00 165,934.43 17.79
PRODUCT BURDEN 13,452.56 (2.89) 0.00 13,452.56 0.00 16,524.41 (18.59
INSTALLATION COSTS 9,027.91 (1.94 ) 0.00 9,027.91 0.00 21,219.00 (57.45
-- ---------- --------- ---- ---------- ---- ---------- ------
COST OF GOODS SOLD 371,953.39 179,81 0.00 371,953.39 0.00 320,914.32 15.90
--, --------- --------- ---- --------- ---- ---------- ------
GROSS MARGIN 94,084.82 (20.19 0.00 94,084.82 0.00 16,271.41 478.22
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE 31,768.06 (6.82 0.00 31,768.06 0.00 90,754.08 (65.00
PURCHASED MATERIAL VARIANCE 1,468.46 (0.32 0.00 1,468.46 0.00 1,332.13 10.23
VARIANCE TO STANDARD 16,730.35 (3.59 0.00 16,730.35 0.00 (9,713.61 272.24
DISCOUNT ALLOCATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SCRA? SALES (1,415.27 0.30 0.00 (1,415.27 0.00 (1,988.95 28.84
INTERIM INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHYSICAL INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT 80,280.86 17.23 0.00 80,280.86 0.00 279,452.86 71.27
CAPITALIZED INVY INDIRECT COST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
--------- --------- ---- --------- ---- ---------- -----
TOTAL OTHER FACTORY EXPENSES 31,729.26 6.81 0.00 31,729.26 0.00 199,069.21 84.06
--------- --------- ---- --------- ---- ---------- - --
GROSS PROF IT 25,814.08 (27.00 0.00 25,814.08 0.00 215.340.62 4 57
3
Page
Year
Budget and PrIor
thru DECEMBER 994
Current Period Compared to
For periods DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
e
mass
30
2:59
03/02/95
.
..
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
Variance
Percent
0.00
Variance
to Budget
- -----
44 04.43
Period
Budget
0.00
Current
Pct
Period
Current
o
2.51
(14.86
(10.51
235.98
(5. 10
(2.42
0.00
0.00
(27.69)
(67.07>
(18.70)
(44.62)
(45.29)
4.61
0.74
(12.69
130.98
(46.28
979.37
0.00
0.00
(81. 58
0.00
(46.97
464.26
95
847.64
141. 63
500.63
391.99
457.15
121.31
0.00
0.00
835.00
397.50
158.00
767.77
118.95
401.24
376.39
556.22
811. 75
311. 82
172.86
0.00
0.00
361.55
0.00
255.66
596.58
49,609
,
,
,
,
,
.
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
40
17
11
6
9
3
3
3
30
6
7
2
26
4
2
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
959.62
594.75
292.00
475.57
465.66
804.32
0.00
0.00
004.46
118.94
517.85
747.80
894.83
511. 83
571.24
485.61
251.50
688.18
865.80
0.00
0.00
435.08
0.00
726.56
458.30
,
,
,
·
,
,
,
,
·
,
·
·
,
45
14
10
21
18
12
o
1
24
3
3
2
26
7
1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
46
9.86
3.13
2.21
4.61
3.96
2.75
0.00
0.00
2.15
0.24
5.26
0.80
0.84
0.54
5.70
0.10
0.05
1.65
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.37
2.03
9
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
04.43
959.62
594.75
292.00
475.57
465.66
804.32
0.00
0.00
004.46
118.94
517.85
747.80
894.83
511.83
571.24
485.61
251.50
688.18
865.80
0.00
0.00
435.08
0.00
726.56
458.30
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
44
45
14
10
21
18
12
7
1
o
1
24
3
3
2
26
DescriptIon
-----------
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
WARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES AND ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
3
2
1
9
1
9
96
9
4
958
220
00
o
953.30
98
00
o
69
42
953.30
98
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
7
o
09
568
270
00
o
057.73
243
00
o
5
52
057.73
243
ACTUAL BURDEN
7.50
00
65
o
08
814
754
79
90
00
00
o
o
67
06
289
768
3
2
00
00
o
o
45.34
82
6
289.67
06
768
3
2
APPLIED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
4
Page
or Year
994
Budget and Pr
thru DECEMBER
Current Period Compared to
For periods DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
massle
39
2:59
03/02/95
I
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
Variance
Percent
Variance
to Budget
Period
Budget
Current
0.00
52.59
89.00
00.00
0.00
0.00
15.07
0.00
(1.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
54.30
832.50
0.00
475.36
0.00
71.68
81.34
0.00
91.06
4.24
0.00
0.00
95.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
89.51
0.00
715.37
674.37
18.39
0.00
0.00
843.37
0.00
369.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
955.02
000.00
0.00
330.40
0.00
15.64
739.58
0.00
42.30
118.83
0.00
0.00
67.93
0.00
202.94
0.00
704.49
3
3
2
1
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
148.85
669.23
503.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
121. 18
0.00
344.88
0.00
555.82
0.00
0.00
944.10
325.04
0.00
900,98
0.00
26.85
521.11
0.00
3.78
123.87
0.00
24.00
132.93
0.00
202.94
0.00
73.88
5
5
1
2
32
(7
o
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Pct
3.25
1.22
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.46
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.00
7.07)
1.57
0.00
0.41
0.00
0.01
2.26
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.02
4
Period
148.85
669.23
503.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
121.18
0.00
344.88
0.00
555.82
0.00
0.00
944.10
325.04
0.00
900.98
0.00
26.85
521.11
0.00
3.78
123.87
0.00
24.00
132.93
0.00
202.94
0.00
73.88
Current
5
5
1
2
32
(7
o
Descriptlon
-----------
SALES, MARKETING & ADVERTISING
SALARIES - MANAGEMENT
SALARIES - SALESMEN
SALARIES - CLERICAL
OVERTIME PREMIUM
INCENTIVES & AWARDS
VACATIONS ¿ HOLIDAYS
PAYROLL TAXES
PENSIONS
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
SALES RECRUITMENT
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
OUTSIDE MANPOWER
MARKET RESEARCH
PROMOTION
MEETINGS & SEMINARS
ADVERTISING - DIRECTORY
TRAVEL ¿ ENTERTAINMENT
RElIT - BUILDING
POSTAGE
TELEPHONE
OTHER UTILITIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
INSURANCE - GENERAL
DUES ¿ SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENT - EQUIPMENT
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
DEPRECIATION
TAXES RIE & PIP
MISCELLANEOUS
65.77
798.59
39
00
o
9
973
65
00
o
6
9
973
65
TOTAL EXPENSE
Page 5
I
Variance to
Last Year ..
or Year
994
Budget and Pr
thru DECEMBER
Current Period Compared to
For periods DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
e
42 mass
2:59
03/02/95
Last Year
This Period
Variance
Percent
Variance
to Budget
Period
Budget
Current
0.00
52.40)
00.00)
19.60 )
(1.82 )
0.00
0.00
212.52
(81.38
52.56
598.44
0.00
0.00
184.15
222.30
17.21
76.64
10.69
0.00
32.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
98.36
0.00
67.84
0.00
489.22
110.25
943.40
558.15
0.00
0.00
805.58
685.68
202.94
176.78
0.00
0.00
521.01
504.31
625.00
598.71
116.52
0.00
497.59
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
481.30
0.00
27
8
4
4
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
461. 55
084.75
0.00
562.50
529.82
0.00
692.50
907.72
127.65
309.60
881.14
0.00
249.68
322.01
625.38
132.58
014.14
556.53
0.00
659.50
266.51
0.00
200.00
0.00
113.52
0.00
8
3
9
1
4
1
1
4
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Pct
82
81
00
34
33
00
15
13
03
07
19
00
27)
93)
35)
16 )
23)
98)
00
14
27
00
04
00
15
00
1
2
o
o
o
o
o
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
6
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Period
461.55
084.15
0.00
562.50
529.82
0.00
692.50
907.72
127.65
309.60
881.14
0.00
249.68
322.01
625.38
132.58
014 .14
556.53
0.00
659.50
266.51
0.00
200.00
0.00
713.52
0.00
Current
8
3
9
1
4
1
1
4
DescriptIon
-----------
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER'S SALARIES
OFFICE SALARIES
OVERTIME PREMIUM
PAYROLL TAXES
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE EXPENSES
LEGAL & AUD IT
OFFICE EXPENSES
DEPRECIATION
INSURANCE - GENERAL
TAXES, FRANCHISES & LICENSES
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
TELEPHONE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF AUTOS
POSTAGE
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
BUILDING OCCUPANCY
DONATIONS
DIRECTORS FEES
BAD DEBT EXPENSE
CHARGE TO ACME SEELY
44
6
3
43
96
00
o
979,36
30
00
o
65
36
979
30
TOTAL EXPENSES
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page 6
For periods DECEMBER 1994 thru DECEMBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co.
INCOME STATEMENT
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to ¡
Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Year .
.
--- ----. --------- ---- --------- ------
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.24) 0.00 10,425.83 0.00 5.061.81 105.97
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.10) 0.00 9,771.66 0.00 5,864.79 66.62
----- ----. --------- ---- --------- ------
4.33) 0.00 20,197.49 0.00 10.926.60 84.85
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (103.71 100.00
0.03 0.00 (126.89 0.00 (12.47 917.56
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.48 0.00 11.550.53 0.00 (4,400.00 62.5\
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.09) 0.00 407.88 0.00 778.04 47.58
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.08) 0.00 5,047.50 0.00 89,146.8\ 05.66
---- ----.. ..-------- ---- --------- -----
1.34 0.00 6.222.04 0.00 92,884.95 93.30
:(; !:: ,.
'; .~
Peri od
00
00
83
00
66
o
o
425
o
771
Current
o
9
LEASE
45 maSSle
Descriptlon
----------
NTEREST EXPENSE
INTEREST EXPENSE PARENT
INTEREST EXPENSE - VISA
INTEREST EXPENSE BANKS
INTEREST EXPENSE CAPTL
OTHER INTEREST EXPENSE
2:59
03/02/95
.
97.49
00
00
89
00
00
53
00
88
00
50
o
o
( 126
o
o
550
o
407
o
047
20
NTEREST EXPENSE
OTHER INCOME & EXPENSE
INTEREST INCOME PARENT
INTEREST INCOME MONEY HARKET
INTEREST INCOME OTHER
CAPITAL GAINS
CAP IT AL LOSSES
REtH~L INCOME
INVESTMENT EXPENSE
BANK FEES
RESTRUCTURING EXPENSE
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
04
222
5
6
INCOME & EXPENSE
~
TOTAL OTHER
'/,? ·1t
.'"
Calvin Jones served fÌ"om October 1, 1973 to November 30, 1994 as Purchasing Agent for
Albemarle County. He established the first Purchasing Department for the County which was
merged with the Finance Department in 1980.
Calvin was a past president of the Virginia Association of Governmental Purchasing and served
on its board of directors for several years. He is now a life member of the organization. Calvin
was also very involved with the Albemarle County Credit Union and served as its pre.sident.
/
~l1.cì.!J
9~--¿)¿f/;;:;'. 511
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596
(804) 296·5823
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors;
v. Wayne Cilimberg. Director ()o.b
Department of Planning and Community Development
SUBJ:
ZMA 94-23, Colonial Auto
DATE:
April 7, 1995
At the Planning Commission public hearing on March 14, 1995 for ZMA 94-23, Colonial
Auto, the Planning Commission voted 4-2 to recommend denial of the petition, primarily due
to lack of assurances about possible traffic generation resulting from the rezoning, which was
in accordance with the staff's position as noted in the staff report.
Since then, the applicant has submitted a proffer to address traffic generation, a copy of
which is attached. Staff feels that this proffer adequately addresses the concerns raised in the
staff report and would now support this petition with this proffer.
VWC/RAL
Attachment
Copy to:
lob Tucker
Ella Carey
Planning Commissioners
I: \general \share \lilley\colonial. mem
LINCOLN GOLONIAL NISSAN
MERCURY CADILLAC
MITSUBISHI PONTIAC
SUZUKI AUTO CENTER GMC TRUCK
C.M.A. Properties,
P.o. Box 7823, Charlottesville, VA
Inc.
22906
PROFFER FORM
Date:
April 4. 1995
ZMA# 94-23
45-
Tax Map Parcel(s)# 94A (part)
1.091 Acres to be rezoned from PDSC to HC
Pursuant to Section 33.3 of the Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance, the owner,
or its duly authorized agent, hereby voluntarily proffers the conditions listed below
which shall be applied to the property, if rezoned. These conditions are proffered as a
part of the requested rezoning and it is agreed that: (1) the rezoning itself gives rise to
the need for the conditions; and (2) such conditions have a reasonable relation to the
rezoning requested.
(1) that no use will be placed on the 1.091 acre parcel located at the west end
of Myers Drive which would generate traffic in excess of 200 trips per day from
that use of the parcel, based on the latest edition of the Trip Generation
Standards published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers.
!~ I·U::~lj M~e.v'5) III
owners Printed names of all ners
étil 4? ~qq5
Dae
fE}~Cp:ap "'F'F«
;. '.;" '_ ~ -;:: ~,JI "~!5 ,:~
rd. C, ~.. a '~ !::......"I f.~;.:r.:-'
APR f!1995
:O¡~n'1;nq PcO·~
¡ '---..' d ." U......i.. ·L.
t......
Route 29 North · P.O. Box 7823 · Charlottesville. Virginia 22906
(804) 978-3711 FAX (804) 978-1711
Affiliate of Carter Myers and Associates· An Employee Owned Co. · Est. 1924
!~
.¡ uì~Z:.z.£.
. .2.s~,. ø:f!..?.JJ f
March 16, 1995
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296·5823
MAR b 1995
Susan E. Thomas
CMA Properties, I nc
P. o. Box 7823
Charlottesville, V A 22906
RE: ZMA-94-23 C M A Properties
Tax Map 45, Parcel 94A (part of)
Dear Ms. Thomas:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March 14, 1995, by a vote of
4-2, recommendcd denial of the above-noted petitioll to the Board of Supervisors.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and
receive public comment at their meeting on APRIL /2. /995. Any new or additional
information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
~¡~
Ronald A. Lilley
Senior Planner
RA1./jcw
cc:~ Carey
First Interstate Charlottesville Ud Ptrn
Jo Iliggins
Amelia McCulley
1
, \
e
e
e
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
RON LILLEY
MARCH 14, 1994
APRIL 12, 1994
ZMA 94-23 CMA Properties (Colonial Auto)
Applicant's Proposal: To expand the parking area for the automobile service facility at the
Colonial Auto Center into an area of approximately 1 acre at the end of Myers Drive between
Colonial Auto and the Rio Hills Shopping Center. According to the proposed site plan
amendment for Colonial Auto Center 98 additional parking spaces result from this additional
area. A location and zoning map is included as Attachment A and the pertinent portion of the
proposed site plan amendment is included as Attachment B.
Petition: To rezone 1.091 acres from PD-SC (Planned Development, Shopping Center) to HC
(Highway Commercial) to make the zoning district of this area the same as the zoning for the
existing Colonial Auto Center and allow for the expanded parking area. The property, described
as Tax Map 45, Parcel 94A (part), is located at the western end of Myers Drive and includes the
cul-de-sac of Myers Drive. The site is in the Rio Magisterial District and is recommended for
Regional Service in Neighborhood 1.
Character of the Area: This site is cleared and relatively level, with a steep bank at its western
side rising up to the rear of a mobile home park. The site is within a very urban commercial area,
with Colonial Auto Center (Car Sales and Service) on one side and the Rio Hills Shopping
Center on the other.
, SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Staffhas reviewed this request for compliance
with the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and, due to concern about potential
traffic generation, is unable to support this request.
Planninl: and Zonin2 History: This property (a portion of a larger parcel) was originally zoned
R-2 and was rezoned to B-1, Business with proffers in 1979. This property was rezoned to PD-
SC as part of the Rio Hills Shopping Center rezoning. The Comprehensive Plan has consistently
designated this area for CommerciallRegional Service uses.
STAFF COMMENT:
This is a relatively minor rezoning request that would enable expansion of an existing use onto a
part of the Rio Hills Shopping Center property that could not be used unless a rezoning and/or
change to the Shopping Center application plan is granted. The major issue for this rezoning is
the possibility of increased traffic generation affecting Route 29 North. Coordination ofI
1
e
e
e
circulation between the Colonial Auto Center and the Rio Hills Shopping Center is also an
important factor.
Traffic Generation
County policy regarding rezonings along Route 29 North has been to allow only as much traffic
generation as could be generated by existing zoning. Since the approved level of square footage
is now in place or soon will be, the Shopping Center property (34.6 acres) may not generate any
more traffic without zoning/plan amendment. Based on the approved level of square footage and
traffic generation standards, Rio Hills Shopping Center generates about 16,000 vehicle trips per
day. The present Colonial Auto property (10 acres) is subject to a proffer of its 1979 rezoning
limiting traffic generation to 400 vehicle trips per day per acre as long as Route 29 North remains
with just two through lanes of traffic. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation Manual, based on building square footage, the Colonial Auto site presently
generates about 1912 trips per day (191.2 per acre).
If this level of generation is applied on a per acre basis to the subject property, an additional 209
trips per day would be generated if this 1.09 acre portion were made a part of the Colonial Auto
operations. It is not clear that expansion of the parking area for the Service Department would
lead to increased traffic generation since the only generation factors available are based on
building square footage and number of employees, but some level of increase could be expected
since more room for display would become available.
Staff opinion is that an increase of 200 or so trips per day from this site is not significant
compared to the estimated 18,000 trips generated as a result of the shopping center and the
present level of Colonial Auto activity. The Virginia Department of Transportation noted that
this proposal does not appear to impact the transportation infrastructure. However, a possible
concern about traffic generation from this site is that, without proffers to the contrary, the HC
zoning would allow for uses that could generate considerably more traffic than the auto sales and
service use would. F or instance, uses such as a fast food restaurant or convenience store could
generate 1700 or more trips per day from a site this size. The applicant is not proffering any
limitations for the HC zoning. It is not clear to what extent the potential high-traffic-generation
uses would be generating new loading on Route 29 versus just drawing from the existing traffic
stream, but increases in the turns off of and onto Route 29 would affect its efficiency, particularly
in the vicinity of the Rio Road intersection.
In terms of overall potential of traffic generation, the amount that could be generated from this
one acre portion is not as significant as that which could be generated by right from the present
Colonial Auto property, but limitations would help ensure some control of the traffic burden on
Route 29. As noted, the present Colonial Auto property is subject to a proffer limiting traffic
generation to 400 trips per day per acre, but only as long as Route 29 remains with just two
through lanes of traffic. The widening of the segment of Route 29 including the Colonial Auto
frontage to three through lanes in each direction is scheduled for completion by the end of 1996.
Therefore, the traffic generation proffer for that 10 acre property is expected to become void
2
e
e
-
soon, meaning that considerably more traffic could be generated by right from the 10 acre
property than from the one acre property. Still, staff opinion is that limitations on traffic
generation for this one acre property would help ensure some control of the traffic burden on
Route 29.
Coordination of Circulation
Myers Drive was originally envisioned as a public road providing a connection from Route 29 to
Berkmar Drive Extended, but is no longer intended to do so. Consequently, its current status as a
private road functioning as a service lane between Colonial Auto and Rio Hills Shopping Center
can be expected to stay the same.
Since the proposal includes closing the cul-de-sac at the end of Myers Drive, the Colonial Auto
Center and the Rio Hills Shopping Center parking areas may be used more for vehicle turn-
arounds that would no longer be possible on Myers Drive. The quantity and nature (how may
cars, how many trucks, on which properties) of these turn-arounds is not known, though it
appears that the Rio Hills property would be most affected by them since there is an entrance into
the Rio Hills rear parking area where Myers Drive would end. The shopping center owners have
indicated that such a scheme is acceptable to them (Attachment C). The shopping center parking
area provides room for such movements and for movements to other shopping center
entrances/exits. While the provision of a cul-de-sac may be ideal for minimizing traffic through
the parking area aisles, staff opinion is that the proposed arrangement is acceptable since Myers
Drive is a private road shared by the two businesses, functions as a service lane for both
businesses, and is not intended to become a through road.
Other Matters
The attached site plan amendment has been submitted in support of this proposal. It has been
reviewed for its acceptability by the pertinent agencies. If this rezoning is granted, several minor
changes will be necessary before the site plan amendment can be approved, but the basic concept
of the amendment is considered acceptable.
Also, if the rezoning is granted, the Rio Hills Shopping Center Application Plan will need to be
revised to reflect the deletion of this area. The shopping center owners have indicated that this
revision, required to be submitted within sixty days of the rezoning approval, is understood.
A fiscal impact analysis has not been performed for this proposal since it does not involve
residential development.
3
e SUMMARY:
e
e
This is a relatively minor rezoning request, but its potential consequence is significant. The
proposed site plan indicates an acceptable development concept, with vehicle circulation being
adequately provided for. However, the potential traffic generation impacts on Route 29 that
could result from this rezoning, while not major compared to existing volumes, cause some
concern for the efficiency of Route 29. The proposed use of parking area expansion for Colonial
Auto is not expected to generate significant additional traffic, but potential uses under unfettered
HC zoning could generate much more traffic than the parking area would. Therefore, staff is
unable to support this request.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Location Map w/ Zoning
B - Proposed site plan amendment (partial)
C - Letter from Shopping Center owners
-----------------------
A:\ZMA9423.RPT
4
ALBEMARLE
COUNTY
{ATTACHMENT AI
~
'"_5'
21
,..
---
SCALI 'N nu
..
61 .
CHARLOTTESVILLE. RIVANNA
JACK JOUETT DISTRICTS
ZillA -GJ4' Z3
Af!6A. SECTION 45
f71~ PAGE NUMBER 11
~Ùe:;r
,..
I
~¡::E'
---- t¡t-~_
\IT"" tt. :!
- -- - - ~~~, - ,
~~Ll
~ ~
~~~ --
~~ "1p
~~
.--- -rZ'-cr
HI- _
\)-t=~~
....~.:!!...J U .
J ,
/
I /
J ... I \ .-- - -
... I / ,/
-r-- I \ \ ....
/ I --
~ . / ~ ) I I J (..... //
f) I~ / / / I J f ----.---.-' --
\'Iè I \J J / / I I .--- -
d I :' !~ / / / / / / \-.... .... --
::::t IB./ / L '
;tš I ~ I :~I I / -"-- -~
I ;Z , I~! / / --
uJ \ d I (
~\ -
~ 14 \ --- - --
----- . --
"- . --
-' --
....... .....
I \- ~ \. ..... ". -- --
~/ ~ I - ------~ -- -
"- ------~ ........ - - --
.....
~ "- ....... , ......
./ . . - \ ....... -
,/ I·' ~ "- -- .......
"- -
i --
....... - -
- - -
....... - -
\ -
- -- .....
'- ..... --
- - --
- --- - - - -
- - -
-
/
,/
--/
--
-
./
-----~
---
......
--
------
z.:::::Þ .
-<tT-
~z t:'
:z~
~~~
~.2~
~~~
o~~ /
uj, ¿ w /"
III If) "ìi!!
è?~
/--~ç
/
(
~
/
I
/
/
/
-------
- --
-
'"
(\¡
'-.:)
'"
......
~
-
.....
,.
....
C\¡
/'
....
__~_ 0 ~
/" .,....... ~
..... --
~ ;:; - )
/ - -- ~ -. .....1
...... ..... '"
/ 1:1\........... ~
......' ........
c:, " Q:¡ Q:¡ 10')
1'::~1t) I::).......~
~"'I-..' ~ '"
<:'¡ . ~ ......
/ / / ~ '" ~, <"........... " 1.
/,,,,'t: 1-..."
/ II ~~~___---" ~ "-
1/// \'---- ~
I,'¡' 10,' ,'~" ~ -...
I IT çp" 0' '- '.1
, c;; I }
.' ,...
/"
/'
-0>
".
/
rL.
fJ~O
\
~O
fJ
"' "' "' . "' .. "' .,;
"' "' - - - - - - -
- - 0 0
0 0 0 0 t- .- 0 0
-
m <;t LO If)
CO (\ (\ LO (\
(\ (\ t- <;t - - ~ LO -
-
~ ~ 'if. 0 ~ ò , ~
0
0 <;t ~ 0 c 0
- <;t ~
- \0 (\ <;t LO '<. 0 "-~ 0
I· t- <;t It) '<:t 0 0
- -
0 t- O
LO '<:t (\ 0 N C If)
'<:t rn
<;t - - LO - .-, C\. 1J If)
10')
"-
..... It)
-. ~
~ ~
: : : : = : : = ~ :-to
CO LO CO ~ ID : Q: -.
CO (\ (\ (\
- - - ...: - - N It) - ~ -.
Q.. ~ C\ I()
I-... Q,}
Ir) Ir) ..... I
.. "' "' ... en 'J- Q:
"' "' '" "' ~ I
- - - - - - - - Q
U ~_J <' " () - ~
\
\
\
e
¡ATTACHMENT cl
.
FIRS~~~~~':;~9~E /:
Mr. H. Carter Myers, III
C.M.A. Properties, Inc.
P.O. Box 7823
Charlottesville, VA 22906
First Interstate Development Group
Execut ive Offices
The Falls Building
57 East Washington Street
Chagrin Falls, Ohio 44022
T eleohone (216) 543-8992
Fax (216) 543-1012
RE: Myers Drive Cul de Sac
Dear Carter:
My partner, Larry Sherman, and I concur with your approach
to the County of Albemarle using the existing entrance and
exit through the rear of Rio Hill Shopping Center as a turn-
around alternative to the Cul de Sac.
You have our authorization to proceed on this matter as
stated in your letter dated January 12, 1995.
Very truly yours,
e
FIRS~,INTERSTATE CHARLOTTESVILLE
./
, , / .-------
/' , . '
,././'/ i ./. I{/¿/~ ~
:.J u' ,,/
:1". íChristopher Rodeno
Partner
sent via fax and mail
e
RECEIVED
MAR ~ 1 1995
P!~nn~!1g Dept.
------- -----
t
.. f
'I- ?-7-5~
.". .." ..,._,..,-'" ---
90~(J V12· 1/5:>
.. .. ,._.,__..,. ..___~._A
~-_."
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE ~ \~
Dept. of Planning & Community DeVeIOpment.::.\-~, \ß_Th~~--:._3
401 Mcintire Road \\ .J ' .,0.'·
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 '. ~:\ \ 6 f1!J
(804) 296·5823 \ ' ~~
March 16, 1995
Steve Runkle
Glenmore Associates Limited Partnership
P. O. Box 5207
Charlottesville, VA 22905
RE: ZMA-94-26 Glenmore Associates
Tax Map 93A1, Parcell, and Section D as shown on Tax Map 93A4
Dear Mr. Runkle:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March 14, 1995, unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that
this approval is subject to the previous agreements amdending #10 as follows:
Development shall be in general accord with the Application Plan and Glenmore Rezoning
Application including textual program of development as described in Exhibit B to the petition~
except that the setbacks for Tax Map 93A1. Parcell and Tax Map 93A4. Section D. Parcels 3. 5.
6.8.9.11. 14. 15. 17. 18. 19.20.21. 22. 24. 25. 36. 37. 38.44.45.47.48.52.53.54.55.56.57.
58.59.60.61. 62. 64. 68. shall be as follows:
Front Yard: Depth of front yard should be no less than twenty-five (25) feet except. in
Section D or future cottage sections. the front yard may be reduced to ten (10) feet for a
maximum lineal distance of twenty-eight (28) feet provided that there shall be no
openings except for garage door(s) in any exterior wall of the enclosed structure parallel
to the street between twenty-five (25) feet and ten (10) feet from the front lot line.
· ,
.. r
Page 2
March 16, 1995
Side Yard: De.pth of side yard shall be no less than fifteen (15) feet except. in Section D
or future cotta~e sections. the depth of side yard shall be no less than three (3) feet.
Comer Side Yard: De.pth of side yard of lots located at street intersections with common
open space of a minimum width of fifteen (15) feet between the lot and one of the street's
right-of-way may be reduced to seven and one-half (7.5) feet.
Rear Yard: De.pth of rear yard shall be no less than twenty (20) feet except in cases in
which the rear lot line abuts common open space or the golf course. then the rear yard of
such lot may be reduced to ten (10) feet.
Final development plans shall incorporate all comments and recommendations of the SRC of
October 11, 1990.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and
receive public comment at their meeting on APRIL 12.1995. Any new or additional
information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely, . . .J-
vJJ)fi~t:2
William D. Frit?lfìl1/
Senior Planner It ~!--
WDF/jcw
~a Carey
Jo Higgins
Amelia McCulley
. '
. r
e
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
WILLIAM D. FRITZ
MARCH 14,1995
APRIL 12, 1995
ZMA 94-26 Glenmore Associates (Please note that this request is similar to
ZMA-94-04 Forest Lakes Associates)
Applicant's Proposal: Proposal to amend agreement 10 of ZMA 90-19 in regards to the
setbacks specified in Exhibit B. Attachment C includes the full set of agreements which apply in
Glenmore and that portion of Exhibit B which addresses setbacks. Currently the setbacks are as
follows:
SETBACKS:
a. Front Yard: Depth oftront yard shall be no less than twenty-five (25) feet except
that the front yard may be reduced to ten (10) feet for a maximum lineal distance
of thirty percent (30%) of the tront lot width provided that there shall be no
openings except for garage door in any exterior wall of the enclosed structure
parallel to the street between twenty-five (25) feet and ten (10) feet trom the tront
lot line and that such reductions may not be made on more than three (3) adjacent
lots nor on more than forty percent (40%) of the lots.
e
b.
Side Yard: Depth of side yard shall be no less than fifteen (15) feet except that
for patio homes or golf cottages each lot shall have two side yards whose sum
shall be no less than fifteen (15) feet such that one required side yard shall be no
less than two (2) feet (provided that there shall be no wall openings of the house
into a side yard which is less than seven (7) feet) and that the other required side
yard be no less than thirteen (13) feet, provided however, that all houses on
adjoining lots shall have a minimum offifteen (15) feet between them. The
minimum distance between buildings may be reduced to eight (8) feet (and the
required yards likewise) provided that the comers of the buildings overlap not
more than fourteen (14) feet; that there are no openings in one of such walls at
such a location; that there shall be no more than four adjacent units with the side
yards so reduced; and that no side yard shall be less than two (2) feet.
c. Comer Side Yard: Depth of side yard of lots located at street intersections with
common open space of a minimum width of fifteen (15) feet between the lot and
one of the street's right-of-way may be reduced to seven and one-half(7.5) feet.
d. Rear Yard: Depth of rear yard shall be no less than twenty (20) feet except in
cases in which the rear lot line abuts common open space or the golf course, then
the rear yard of such lot may be reduced to ten (10) feet.
-
The setbacks would remain unchanged except for Tax Map 93Al, Parcell and Tax Map 93A4,
Section D, Parcels 3,5,6,8,9, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19,20,21,22,24,25,36,37,38,44,45,47,
48, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 64, 68. The setbacks for these parcels would be as
follows:
1
e
e
-
..
Front Yard: Depth of tront yard should be no less than twenty-five (25) feet except, in
Section D or future cottage sections, the tront yard may be reduced to ten (10) feet for a
maximum lineal distance of twenty-eight (28) feet provided that there shall be no
openings except for garage door( s) in any exterior wall of the enclosed structure parallel
to the street between twenty-five (25) feet and ten (10) feet trom the tront lot line.
Side Yard: Depth of side yard shall be no less than fifteen (15) feet except, in Section D
or future cottage sections, the depth of side yard shall be no less than three (3) feet.
Comer Side Yard: Depth of side yard of lots located at street intersections with common
open space of a minimum width of fifteen (15) feet between the lot and one of the street's
right-of-way may be reduced to seven and one-half(7.5) feet.
Rear Yard: Depth of rear yard shall be no less than twenty (20) feet except in cases in
which the rear lot line abuts common open space or the golf course, then the rear yard of
such lot may be reduced to ten (10) feet.
Petition: Glenmore Associates petitions the Board of Supervisors to amend the existing
agreements of the Glenmore PRD, Planned Residential Development to establish modified
setbacks in the undeveloped portions of Glenmore. Property, described as Tax Map 93Al,
Parcel 1, and Section D as shown on Tax Map 93A4 is located in the Glenmore development.
Character or the Area: This area is currently being development with single family detached
units.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the intent of the original rezoning and is of
the opinion that this request is consistent with the previous approval.
Plannine and Zonine History: The original rezoning for this site was approved on December
5, 1990. Numerous plats have been approved.
Comprehensive Plan: This site is located in the Village of East Rivanna. No Comprehensive
Plan issues have been identified.
STAFF COMMENT:
The existing setbacks have proven difficult to interpret and enforce. The proposed setbacks are
intended to provide clarity and do not represent a change in the character of the development.
The Zoning Department has reviewed the proposed setbacks and is of the opinion that they are
superior to the previous setbacks.
2
, ,
e
e
e
..
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of this request as it is consistent with the intent of the original
approval and is proposed solely to aid in interpretation and enforcement.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The agreements would remain the same except for condition 10 which would be amended to read
as follows:
Development shall be in general accord with the Application Plan and Glenmore Rezoning
Application including textual program of development as described in Exhibit B to the petition.
exc~pt that the setbacks for Tax Map 93A1. Parcell and Tax Ma,p 93A4. Section D. Parcels 3. 5.
6. 8. 9. 11. 14. 15. 17. 18. 19.20.21. 22. 24. 25. 36. 37. 38. 44. 45. 47. 48. 52. 53. 54.55.56. 57.
58.59.60.61. 62. 64. 68. shall be as follows:
Front Yard: D~pth offtont yard should be no less than twenty-five (25) feet except. in
Section D or future cotta,ge section$. the ftont yard m~ be reduced to ten (10) feet for a
maximum lineal distance of twenty-eight (28) feet provided that there shall be no
openings except for garage door($) in any exterior wall of the enclosed structure parallel
to the street between twenty-five (25) feet and ten (10) feet ITom the ITont lot line.
Side Yard: De.pth of side yard shall be no less than fifteen (15) feet except. in Section D
or future cottage sections. the depth of side yard shall be no less than three (3) feet.
Comer Side Yard: Depth of side yard of lots located at street intersections with common
open &pace ofa minimum width offifteen (15) feet between the lot and one of the street's
. right-of-way may be reduced to seven and one-half(7.5) feet.
Rear Yard: D~pth of rear yard shall be no less than twenty (20) feet except in cases in
which the rear lot line abuts common open &pace or the golf course. then the rear yard of
such lot m~ be reduced to ten (10) feet.
Final development plans shall incorporate all comments and recommendations of the SRC of
October 11, 1990.
----------------
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Location Map
B - Tax Map
C - Previous agreements
D - Proposed agreements
------------------------
I:\GENERAL\SHARE\JANICE\ZMA9426.RPT
3
o
I ',,;/A¡ '-, --"'"
f'Rr 66 I
I
. -
'- -- --------
,
\
( ~"~,,
c
""'-
lJ
ATI'ACHMENT A
~
EARL YSVILLE AREA
'.
~OuA fl"US MAP SCAlE
o~
..c 1\I
G~
'-'><r
"1/.i7:. . 1/:............
177 ~
~ .
"'f
~
",'I'
,,'Ò'
~O
" ,
I
I
I
I
I
t
-- - --WI
,\
.
>"
,
"
(
"
~
JiB]
",'to ~
( 10) . 'to'" . .... ...
"-/ 0?" ,
f
."
'" ,
[t;}} 1 ; ..
. , i/.'ll
..
B
A'ITACHMENT
..
V
<t
r<>
en
z
o
l-
t)
1LI
(f
I-
2
~
(f
c
<t
Z
Z
<t
>
a:
i
--------.
/
/ r0
/~ //
/ ~/
\/ --. -
--- .-------
- .
~.<>-. 0J. ___..._
. . -
..~\. --
. .
. -
'" -..
<\ ~ ~,
~ -=~l ~>
/
/
-~-
//'>---
/
/"/
<T
'"
t-
11)
<t
r<>
en
z
o
§
LLI
(f
l-
t)
~
(f
Õ
«
z
z
~
a:
-'
~
~
0.
/
::;;
I-
uJ
uJ
<f>
41
't't
e
e
e
r'
--.
..
ATl'ACHMENT C
~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Pli:lnning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596
(804) 296·5823
March 24, 1994
Glenmore Associates Limited ptrn
P. o. Box 5207
Charlottesville, VA 22905
RE: ZMA-93-19 Glenmore Associates Limited Partnership
(applicant) ¡ Marion Belts Lang (owner)
Dear Sir:
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on
March 16, 1994, approved the above-noted request to amend ZMA-90-
19 by rezoning 8.028 acres from Rural Area to Planned Residential
Development. Please note that this approval is subject to the
following conditions:
1. continuing modifications pursuant to § 8.5.4 (d) as setforth
in ZMA-90-19¡
2. Acceptance of the revised proffers dated February 24, 1994
as follows:
"with respect to ZMA-93-19 Glenmore Associates Limited
Partnership/Marion Belts Lang, Proffers made relative to
ZMA-90-19 should be revised to include Tax Map 93, Parcel
61A (see attached memo dated December 10, 1990).
Specifically, Proffer 1 should be amended to read: "...not
to exceed 758 single family units..."
Please note a revised Application Plan must be submitted within
sixty (60) days pursuant to § 8.5.5.
e
e
e
'"
Glenmore Associates Limited ptrn
Page 2
March 24, 1994
ATI'ACHMENT C PAGE 2 -
- .,
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the
above-noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
v. Wayne Cilimberg
Director of Planning & Community Development
VWCjjcw
cc: Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins
e
I 1_ I,
...
. ~ - I ..
1 _ '--:." I , .
- A'ITACHMENT C PAGE 3
~
..
THE
KESSLER
GROUP
e
e
S\i::l'lwn N Runkle
Pn'>ld"IH February 24, 1994
~r. Ron Keeler
Chief of Planning
Albemarle County Planning Department
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, virginia 22901-4596
Dear Ron:
with respect to ZMA-93-19 - Glenmore Associates Limited
Partnership/Marion Belts Lang, Proffers made relative to ZMA-90-
19 should be revised to include Tax Map 93, Parcel 61A (see
attached memo dated December la, 1990). specifically, Proffer 1
should be amended to read".. .not to exceed 758 single family
units...".
Please advise if you have questions or comments.
s~;;. ¡J. iZL
Stephen N. Runkle
General Partner
Glenmore Associates
P 0 Fh.1x 5207, Ch,ltll)(:'~5\·ilk. Va. 22905 \804) 979·9500 FAX No. 296·1614
¡ L._I..: ..·1 - ._' ..1
I I j ._: ~__I ,. ,. 1 . 1 I l
I _ "_I _
.
..'" :
..
- A'ITACHMENT C PAGE 4
..
~
e
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
D'!pt of Plðnning & Community Development
401 Mdnlirl:! RO.1d
C harlott'!5vllle. VirgInia 22901-4596
(804) 296·5823
December 12, 1990
Frank A. Kessler
P. O. Box 5207
Charlottesville, VA 22905
RE: ZMA-90-19 Frank Kessler
Dear Mr. Kessler:
e
The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, at its meeting on
December 5, 1990, approved ZMA-90-19 as proffered in
Attachments 1 -7 entitled: "Proffer for Tax Map 9:3, Parcels
59 and 60; Tax Map 79D, Section :3, Parcels 6 and 7; and, Tax
Map 94, Parcels 2 and 11, in Connection with Petition to
Rezone to Planned Residentiùl Development (PRD) with Private
Roads!!, dated November 8, 1990, by Frank A. Kessler,
Applicant and Owner, together with modifications and
recommendations for private roads.
Attached please find a copy of the Board of supervisors
action letter which outlines, in detail, the Board's
approval.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the
above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me.
sincerely,
û.úJ~ ..
v. Way Cilimb~
Direc r of Plahni & Community Development
e
VWC/jcw
cc: Amelia Patterson
Richard Moring
L I;' ._'" ..:.L__·_'--'J. " I I ,
~
.
. , ,
I ~"
- A'ITACHMENT C PAGE 5
..
~
e
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
OF'FICE OF' BOAAO OF SUPE:RVISORS
401 MCINTIRE ROAO
CHARLOTTESVILLE:. VIRGINIA 2~9014596
M E H 0 RAN D U H
DATE:
December 10, 1990
[),~ ~-;; n~]"ìlW"1~~)'~~
..~ ~¡ \ ~~,,)~ r fI,' ~
l'¡ ó\ }...'\' ..,."'.,....~ ~,' ,
(\i\'.."-' ~
~ r~' IJ]
.'''-'
Dr:r. 1°1900 '
PLANNING D!VISION
FROH:
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning
and Community Deve~opment;l
Lettie E. Neher, Clerk ~
TO:
SUBJECT:
Board Actions of December 5, 1900
e
At the Boôrd of Supervisors meeting held on December 5, 1990, the following
action wôs taken:
Agenda Item No. 16. ZMA-90-19. Frank Kessler. Public hearing on a
request to rezone 1195.02 aCre from Rural Areas to Pl~nned Residential Develop~
ment (proffered). Property bordered by Rt 250 on the north and by the Rivanna
River on the south and west. Tax Map 79D, Section J, Parcels 6 & 7¡ Tax Hap 9J,
Parcels 59 & 60¡ Tax Hap 94, Parcels 2 & 11. Rivanna District. APPROVED
ZMA-90-19 as proffered in Attachments 1 ~ 7 (all as set out belo~) entitled:
"Proffer for TaX Hap 93, Parcels 59 and 60; Tax Map 79D"Section J, Parcels 6
and 7; and, Tax Map 94, Parcels 2 and 11, in Connection ~ith Petition to Rezone
to Planned Residential Development (PRD) with Private Roads", dated November 8,
1990, by Frank A. Kessler, Applicant and Owner, together with modifications and
recommendations for privat~ roads.
PROFFER FOR TAX MAP 93, PARCELS S9 AND 60~
TAX HAP 79D, PARCELS 6 AND 7, SECTION 3, AND TAX MAP
94, PARCELS 2 AND 11 IN CONNECTION WITH
PETITION TO REZONE TO PLANNED R.E.S1J}ENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT (PRD) WITH PRIVATI.': ROADS
Applicant, as the owner of Tax Hap 93, Parcels 59 and 60, Tax Map 79D,
Parcels 6 and 7, Section 3, and Tax Hap 94, Parcel$ 2 and 11, collectively
e hereinafter sometimes ca.lled the IIpropertil, hereby proffers:
1. The development of the Property will be limited to those uses allowed
by right unde.r Section 19.3.1 (1), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9) and (10) of the
Zoning Ordinance of Albemarle County, Virginia, with a residential development
not to exceed 750 single family units together with a site for a school. and a
site for a fire house, either of which sites may be used for other public use
I 1 1.
. ,j
, .
ATI'ACHMENT C PAGE 6
..
.
e
Memo To: V. Wayne Cilimberg
Date: December 10, 1990
Pag!! 2
facilities, and dev~lopment of a private country club and recreational facili-
ties including but not limited to tennis. swimming, a golf course with related
club house, and an equestrian center. To be excluded from use by right or
special permit under the Zoning Ordinance of Albemarle County, Virginia, are
Section 19.3.1 (2) and (3); and Section 19.3.2 (1). (3), (5), (6) and (7).
2. Upon the request of Albemarle County, Virginia, to donate by gift to
Albemarle County or its designee, subject to items of record affecting title,
for a public school or other public use facilities as the County may select a
parcel of approximately 27.0 acres as shown on the Application Plan for Glenmore
made by Clower Associates, Inc., together with an appropriate access right Qf
way, provided own~r may require reasonable visual screening/buffering of the 27
acres.
e
3. Upon the request of Albemarle County, Virginia, to donate by gift to
Albemarle County or its designee, subject to items of record affecting title,
for a fire department or other public use facilities as the County may select a
parcel of approxim~tely 6.0 acres as shown on the Application Plan for Glenmore
made by Clower Associates, Inc., togethe~ with an appropriate access tight of
way, provided owner may require reasonable visual screening/buffering of the six
acres.
~. At the time of closing of the sale of each residential lot or the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each residential lot, whichever fi~st
occurs, to contribute $1000.00 to an escrow fund to be established by Albemarle
County for (1) a school capital improvement fund for use by Albemarle County to
either expand the capacity of Stone Robinson Elementary School or to construct a
new school on the site describ~d in paragraph 2 of this proffer, or (2) the
costs. including any awards to the owner of the mineral rights, associated with
condemnation of mineral rights for the property described in paragraphs 2 and 3
of this proffer, or (3) other items in the Albemarle County Capital Improvement
Program (C.l.P.) related to this project (Glenmore) or to other items not nor~
mally included i~ C.l.P. directly related to this projact (Glerumore).
The funds shall be held by the County in an interest bearing account with
ðn annual accounting to the owner. All interest earned 00 the account shall be
used ooly for the same purposes ØS the original $1000.00 contribution. It is
requested that Frank A. Kessler or his family be consulted in connection with
the naming of any facilities for which these funds are used.
e
S. To p~ovide water and sewer collection, distribution and treatment
f~cilities at his expense for the residential lots in Glenmore and' þrivata
country club and to dedicate such facilities to the Albemarle County Service
Authority and/or the Rivanna Service Authority. These facilities ~re to be
built at no cost to the taxpayers of Albemarle County or to the customers of the' ,
Alb~marle County Service Authority.
6. To reserve along the boundary of the Property adjacent to the Rivanna
River a 100 foot wide green belt. No buildings shall be constructed, or erected
within the green belt without the consent of Albemarl~ County and it shall be
11. _"I
.' ·1
--
.
ATrACHMENT C PAGE 7
~
..
e
Marno To: V. Wayne Cilimberg
Date: December 10, 1990
Page 3
preserved in its nacural state except for building of pedestrian and riding
trails and g~ncral beautific.tion including but not limited to the clearing of
underbrush, removal of dead trees and shrubs, and cleanup of the river. The
o....ner may grant acrOSS the green belt utility ease.ments, access easements to the
Rivanna River for the residents of Glenmore and members and guests of the pri-
vate country club, and may build riding trails or make other similar uses of the
arQa..
At such time as the County of Albemarle decides to establish along the
Rivanna River a public area or park, the 100 foot wide green belt area, upon
request of Albemarle County, will be conveyed by gift and dedicated to the
County, provided the uses allowed for utilities, accesses to the river, and
riding trails, etc. are reserved in the deed of gift and provided further that
the green belt area will continue to be counted as open space for purposes of
the Glenmore Master Plan and required d~nsity. The green belt may continue to
be maintained by the owner of the property, however in the absence of sucb
maintenance Albemarle Couoty at its option may maintain the 100 foot wide 8ree~
belt.
e
7. (~) Road A as shown on the Application Plan of Glenmore mada by Clo....er
Associates, Inc. shall be built at time of residential lot development to VDOT
standards and placed in the State Secondary System from U.S. Routa'250E to Point
A as shown on the aforesaid Application Plan of Glenmore.
(b) Upon request of Albemarle County, Virginia, to dedicate as a
right-of-way for public road purposes (i) a strip of land not to exceed sixty
(60) feet in width from Point A to Point B as shown on the aforesaid Application
Plan of Glenmore and (ii) an existing strip of land of variable width owned by
the owner from Point B to Point C as shown 00 the ðforesaid Application Plan of
Gh.runore.
(c) To construct a road to VDOT standards from Point C extending
through the northeastern portion of the development in a location and with a
termination point to be determined by the owner. It is intended that this
roadway shall provide access to properties northeast of Glenmore in at least one
location. To dedicate at such time as owner may select or upon request of
Albemarle County, Virginia, whichever first occurs, the road described in this
paragraph, 7(c), together with a right-af-....ay, including the built road, nQt to
exceed 60 feet in width.
8. (d) To construct within the existing right-of-way of U.S. Route 250E
and if neccss~ry partially on the property currently owned by owner an ultim~te
entrance to serve Glenmore. This shall be constructed at the time of initial
residential lot development in Glerumore or at a later date if approved by VDOT.
e
(b) To install upon the request of VDOT on U.S. Route 250Eat the
entrance to Glenmore a traffic signal, provided the request from VDOT is made
prior to completion of Glenmore which for purposes of this paragraph shall be
deemed to be the day the last residential lot is sold to a third party purchaser
or: 15 years from date of final approval of the Zoning Hap Amendment, whichever
first occurs.
, I ,
e
e
e
, "
..
~
A'ITACHMENT C PAGE 8
WII
...
Memo To: V, Wayne Cilimberg
Date: December 10, 1990
Page 4
(c) Providing the work is completed within 15 years from date of final
approval of this Zoning Hap Amendment, to contribute upon completion (i) a
pro-rata contribution of the cost of construction (as hereinafter defined) to
four-lane U.$. Route 250E from the Glenmore entrance to Route 22, or (ii)
$500,000.00, whichever sum is less.
A traffic count on u.s. Route 250E shall ba made by VDOT imm~diatQly to
the east of tha intersection of U.S. Route 250E and Routa 22 within a reasonable
time prior to construction with the pro-rata contribution of the owner deter-
mined by a formula which includes a fraction the numerator of which is the
trAffic count on U.S. Route 250E between the Glenmore entrance and Route 22
attributabl~ to residences in Glenmore and to the country club facility in
Glenmore (Glenmore Traffic) and the denominator of which is the total traffic
count on U.S. Route 250E between the Glenmore entrance and Route 22 (Total
Traffic) as follo~s:
Glenmore Traffic
Total Traffic X Construction Cost = Pro-Rata Contribution
(9) In the event that there shall not have been substantial performance of
proffers contained in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 5 ~ithin ten (10) years from the
date of final approval of this Zoning Map Amendment, then the undersigned appli-
cant agrees to waive his rights under Virginia Code Section 15.1-491(al). Sub-
stantial performance shall include (1) donation of the land described in para-
graphs 2 and 3 of this proffer, if requested £y Albemarle COllntvL (2) paym~nt of
at least $150,000.00 in cash pursuant to paragraph 4 of this proffer, and (3)
construction and dedication to the appropriate authorities of the public water
and sewer facilities pursuant to paragraph 5 of this proffer.
(10) Development shall be in general accord with the Application Plan and
Glenmore Rezoning Application including textual program of development as de-
scribed in Exhibit B to the petition. Final development plans shall incorporate
all comments and recommendations of the SRC of October 11, 1990.
(11) All private roads shall be constructed to VDOT mountainous terrain
standards, however, clearing of private road easements shall be restricted to
matters of safety as identified by the County Engineer in the final review
process. Road maintenance fees shall be in accord with VDOT subdivision streets
maintenance fe~s (as Amended from time to time) and provisions satisfactory to
the County Attorney shall be made for continuous collection and expenditure of
such fees. At least one deputized security officer (special police officer)
shall be employed for security purposes.
(12) These proffers are substituted in place of proffers dated September
20, 1990.
Signed by F. A. Kessler on 8th day of November, 1990.
'* 1< * * þ.
Modifications pursuant to Section 8.5.4(d) of the Zoning Ordinance and
referenced private roads as follows:
e
e
-
I I ~_ I·
. ,
'"
. ~. . I
l . _ I. . \
_". I
\,
- ATl'ACHMENT C PAGE 9
~
~
Private roads are authorized under the Subdivision Ordinance
provision of §lS-36(c) and (due to density comparable to RA,
Rural Area zoning) §lS-36(b) subject to proffer 11.
Lotting configuration as proposed by Glenmore rezoning
application: Approval of modification of §4.11.3 of the
Zoning Ordinance as proposed in Exhibit B subject to Fire
Official approval as outlined in site Review Committee
comments of October 11, 1990.
e
e
e
..
[fhtOh,·¡" ..ß
- ATI'ACHMENT C PAGE 10
..
..
6. No uses shall be permitted except for irrigation purposes
which would use any water or sewer system other than the
Albemarle County public water or sewer system unless
approved by the Albemarle County Service Authority and
County Health Department.
7. The applicant shall install a uniform and effective
signage system throughout the development and will, at
the appropriate time, submit a complete signage concept
to the Planning Director for review and approval.
8. Interpretations and clarifications of this application
may be made by the Planning Director, without the
necessity for amendment provided that the general intent,
concept, densities, land use pattern, etc. of the textual
statement and Master Plan are adhered to.
9. There shall be at least one (1) swimming pool and two (2)
all weather surface tennis courts and four (4) clay
surface tennis courts within the development. In
addition, small neighborhood play areas and other
recreational facilities may be incorporated where
feasible. One basketball court is proposed and
additional court(s) may be added in the future if demand
by the membership warrants such. Some basketball
facilities will be available at the school site as that
develops.
10. Lot Guidelines
a. Single-family lots may front on and have direct
access onto the spine road where topographic
conditions and other site constraints dictate.
. .. 1~~'
:....
b.
Frontage on cul-de-sac may be reduced to thirty-five
(35) feet (as utilized in Forest Lakes).
c. Access easements shall be provided to any lots
that do not front directly onto the road or street.
d. Flag lots shall be permitted (as utilized in Forest
Lakes) .
11. Setbacks
a.
Front Yard:
Depth of front yard shall be no less than twenty-five
(25) feet except that the front yard may be reduced
to ten (10) feet for a maximum lineal distance of
thirty percent (30%) of the front lot width provided
that there shall be no openings except for garage
door in any exterior wall of the enclosed structure
parallel to the street between twenty five (25)
B - 10
e
e
e
.. .
, ~ t~ ~ :¥..
- A'ITACHMENT C PAGE 11
~
feet and ten (10) feet from the front lot line and
that such reductions may not be made on more than
three (3) adjacent lots nor on more than forty
percent (40%) of the lots.
-'
b.
Side Yard:
Depth of side yard shall be no less than fifteen (15)
feet except that for patio homes or golf cottages
each lot shall have two side yards whose sum shall
be no less than fifteen (15) feet such that one
required side yard shall be no less than two (2) feet
(provided that there shall be no wall openings of the
house into a side yard which is less than seven (7)
feet) and that the other required side yard be no less
than thirteen (13) feet, provided however, that all
houses on adjoining lots shall have a minimum of
fifteen (15) feet between them. The minimum distance
between buildings may be reduced to eight (8) feet
(and the required yards likewise) provided that the
corners of the buildings overlap not more than
fourteen (14) feet; that there are no openings in one
of such walls at such a location; that there shall be
no more than four adjacent units with the side yards
so reduced; and that no side yard shall be less
than two (2) feet.
c. Corner Side Yard:
Depth of side yard of lots located at street
intersections with common open space of a minimum
width of fifteen (15) feet between the lot and one
of the street's right-of-way may be reduced to
seven and one-half (7.5) feet.
d. Rear Yard:
Depth of rear yard shall be no less than twenty (20)
feet except in cases in which the rear lot line abuts
common open space or the golf course, then the rear
yard of such lot may be reduced to ten (10) feet.
B - 11
! ,
" '.. .
THE
e KESSLER
GROUP
~
...
ATI'ACHMENT D
DFC 28 1994
ALBEMl\hL.~ \.iUUNTY
--. __a ._......
'_U'~ . .
Stephen N. Runkle
President
December 27, 1994
Mr. Wayne Cilimberg
Albemarle County Planning
401 McIntire Rd.
Charlottesville, Virginia
22901
Dear Wayne:
I am writing to request an amendment to the setback language
in Glenmore. The current language (see attached) is very
confusing and presents interpretation problems to the County and
title insurance companies.
My specific request is that the requirements be changed to
those stated below:
e
FRONT YARD
Depth of front yard should be no less than twenty-five (25)
feet except, in Section D or future cottage sections, the front
yard may be reduced to ten (10) feet for a maximum lineal
distance of twenty-eight (28) feet provided that there shall be
no openings except for garage door(s) in any exterior wall of the
. enclosed structure parallel to the street between twenty-five
(25) feet and ten (10) feet from the front lot line.
SIDE YARD
Depth of side yard shall be no less than fifteen (15) feet
except, in Section D or future cottage sections, the depth of
side yard shall be no less than three (3) feet.
No changes are requested relative to corner side yard or
rear yard setbacks.
I would like it made clear that exceptions made for
architectural features in Section 4.11.1 of the Zoning Ordinance
shall also be applicable in Glenmore.
Please advise if you would like additional information.
e
Sincerely,
~//;g4..
Stephen N. Runkle
P.O. Box 5207, Charlottesville, Va. 22905 (804) 979-9500 FAX (804) 979-8055
1-7'7';-
7!s~ (J'I/2, 3/ Þ
Î\
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 2%·5823
March 16, 1995
,'" ""C'95
.~: i~.:1'>..,. .
Steve Runkle
Forest Lakes Associates
P. O. Box 5207
Charlottesville, VA 22901
, I
RE: ZMA-94-27 Forest Lakes Associates
Dear Mr. Runkle:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March 14, 1995, unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that
this approval is subject to the previous agreements amending #10 as follows:
Development shall be in general accord with the Application Plan and Forest Lakes South
Rezoning Application including textual program of development as described in "Forest Lakes
South Rezoning Application" amended August 13, 1991 to the petition, except that the setbacks
for Tax Map 46B5 Parcell and Tax Map 46B6 Section A Parcel 24. 47. Section C Parcel 4. 5. 9.
26. 32. shall be as follows:
Front Yard:
Depth of front yard should be no less than twenty five (25) feet except the front yard may
be reduced to ten (10) feet for a maximum lineal distance oftwenty-ei~ht (28) feet
provided that there shall be no openin~s except for ~ara~e door(s) in any exterior wall of
the enclosed structure parallel to the street between twenty-five (25) and ten (10) feet
from the front lot line.
Side Yard:
Depth of side yard shall be no less than seven and one half (7 1/2) feet except. in sections
specified as patio sections. the depth of the side yard shall be no less than three (3) feet
Page 2
March 16, 1995
Corner Side Yard:
Depth of side yard of lots located at street intersections with common open space of a
minimum width of fifteen (15) feet between the lot and one of the street's right-of-way
may be reduced to seven and one-half (7.5) feet.
Rear Yard:
Depth of rear yard shall be no less than twenty (20) feet except in cases in which the rear
lot abuts common open space. then the rear yard of such a lot may be reduced to ten (10)
fm
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and
receive public comment at their meeting on APRIL 12.1995. Any new or additional .. I
information regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
~inCereIY~~ ~ J I, n ,
~ "'- ~=ti~
~i ski
Planner
YH/jcw
cc: Ella Carey
Jo Higgins
Tom Gale
Amelia McCulley
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
YOLANDA IllPSKI
MARCH 14, 1995
APRIL 12, 1995
ZMA 94-27 Forest Lakes Associates
NOTE: THIS REPORT IS SIMILAR TO (ZMA 94-26) GLENMORE
ASSOCIATES
Applicant's Proposal:
Proposal to amend General Condition 10 ofZMA 91-04 as regards setbacks. Attachment B
includes the full set of agreements which apply in Forest Lakes South and that portion of the
Application Plan which addresses setbacks. Currently the setbacks are as follows:
Front Yard:
Depth of!Tont yard shall be no less than twenty-five (25) feet except that the !Tont yard
may be reduced to ten (10) feet for a maximum lineal distance of thirty percent (30%) of
the rront lot width provided that there shall be no openings except for garage door in any
exterior wall of the enclosed structure parallel to the street between twenty five (25) feet
and ten (10) feet !Tom the !Tont lot line and that such reductions may not be made on
more than three (3) adjacent lots nor on more than forty percent (40%) of the lots.
Side Yard:
Depth of side yard shall be no less than ten (10) feet except that for patio homes, each lot
shall have two side yards whose sum shall be no less than fifteen (15) feet such that one
required side shall be no less than two (2) feet (provided that there shall be no wall
openings of the house into a side yard which is less than seven (7) feet and that the other
required side yard be no less thirteen (13) feet, provided however, that all houses on
adjoining lots shall have a minimum of fifteen (15) feet between them. The minimum
distance between buildings may be reduced to eight (8) feet (and the required yards
likewise provided that the corners of the buildings overlap not more than fourteen (14)
feet; that there are no openings in one of such walls at such a location; that there shall be
no more than four adjacent units with the side yards so reduced; and that no side yards
. shall be less than two (2) feet.
Corner Side Yard:
Depth of side yard of lots located at street intersections with common open space of a
minimum width offifteen (15) feet between the lot and one of the street's right-of-way
may be reduced to seven and one-half (7.5) feet.
1
Rear Yard:
Depth of rear yard shall be no less than twenty (20) feet except in cases in which the rear
lot abuts common open space, then the rear yard of such lot may be reduced to ten (10)
feet.
The setbacks would remain unchanged except for Tax Map 46B5, Parcel 1 and Tax Map 46B6,
Section B, Parcels 9, Tax Map 46B6 Section A Parcel 24, 47, Section C Parcel 4, 5, 9, 26, 32.
The setbacks for these parcels would be as follows:
Front Yard:
Depth of ITont yard should be no less than twenty five (25) feet except the ITont yard may
be reduced to ten (10) feet for a maximum lineal distance of twenty-eight (28) feet
provided that there shall be no openings except for garage door( s) in any exterior wall of
the enclosed structure parallel to the street between twenty-five (25) and ten (10) feet
ITom the ITont lot line.
Side Yard:
Depth of side yard shall be no less than seven and one half (7 1/2) feet except, in sections
specified as patio sections, the depth of the side yard shall be no less than three (3) feet
Comer Side Yard:
Depth of side yard of lots located at street intersections with common open space of a
minimum width of fifteen (15) feet between the lot and one of the street's right-of-way
may be reduced to seven and one-half(7.5) feet.
Rear Yard:
Depth of rear yard shall be no less than twenty (20) feet except in cases in which the rear
lot abuts common open space, then the rear yard of such a lot may be reduced to ten (10)
feet.
Petition: Forest Lakes Associates petitions the Board of Supervisors to amend existing
agreements of the Forest Lakes South PRD, Planned Residential Development to establish
modified setbacks in the undeveloped portions of Forest Lakes South. Property, described as
Tax Map 46B5, Parcell, located in the Forest Lakes South development (See Attachment A).
Character of the Area: This area is currently being developed with mostly single family
detached units.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the intent of the original rezoning and is of
the opinion that this request is consistent with the previous approval.
2
Plannine and Zonine History:
The original rezoning for this site was approved on October 16, 1991. Numerous plats have
been approved.
Comprehensive Plan:
This site is located in the Community ofHollymead. No Comprehensive Plan issues have been
identified.
STAFF COMMENT:
The existing setbacks have proven difficult to interpret and enforce. The proposed setbacks are
intended to provide clarity and do not represent a change in the character of the development.
The Zoning Department has reviewed the proposed setbacks and is of the opinion that they are
superior to the existing setback provisions.
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends approval of this request as it is consistent with the intent of the original
approval and is proposed solely to aid in interpretation and enforcement.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The agreements would remain the same except for condition 10 which would be amended to read
as follows:
Development shall be in general accord with the Application Plan and Forest Lakes South
Rezoning Application including textual program of development as described in "Forest Lakes
South Rezoning Application" amended August 13, 1991 to the petition, except that the setbacks
for Tax Map 46B5 Parcell and Tax Map 46B6 Section A Parcel 24. 47. Section C Parcel 4. 5. 9.
26. 32. shall be as follows:
Front Yard:
Depth of ITont yard should be no less than twenty five (25) feet except the ITont yard may
be reduced to ten (10) feet for a maximum lineal distance oftwen(y-eight (28) feet
provided that there shall be no openings except for garage door(s) in any exterior wall of
the enclosed structure parallel to the street between twenty-five (25) and ten (10) feet
from the ITont lot line.
Side Yard:
Depth of side yard shall be no less than seven and one half (7 1/2) feet excej>t. in sections
~ecified as patio sections. the depth of the side yard shall be no less than three (3) feet
3
specified as patio sections. the depth ofthe side yard shall be no less than three (3) feet
Corner Side Yard:
Depth of side yard of lots located at street intersections with common open space of a
minimum width of fifteen (15) feet between the lot and one of the street's ri~ht-of-way
may be reduced to seven and one-half(7.5) feet.
Rear Yard:
Depth of rear yard shall be no less than twenty (20) feet except in cases in which the rear
lot abuts common open space. then the rear yard of such a lot may be reduced to ten (10)
feet.
----------------
A TT ACHMENTS:
A - Location Map
B - Agreements related to (ZMA 91-04) Forest Lakes Associates
A:\ZMA9427.RPT
4
1\1
".
o
,
,
I
I
I
I ATTACHMENT AI!
I
I
I
I
I
II IT
RT 661
I
I
.
.
---------------------,-----------------
1""",1
~
~
c
I
-.......;..,
lJ
EARL YSVILLE AREA
fOUA Tt'-'ES "'", SC.....lf
0l¡
"'1\1
G~
,)"",,<co
/~<,j
, , . /~ov C'
~~'?' °ú
..,0 1\1
.... / ,."
'<......
j~ r1;"-'
~""
,¡:.
0.:5
~
"
....
..:::>
o
"
I
GENERAL CONDITIONS
The following conditions are applicable to the land uses on
the property.
1.
The acres noted in Chart I and Chart II may be
increased by fifteen percent (15%) within any tract,
tract boundaries may be adjusted to meet field
conditions, and tracts may be combined or divided at
the time of preliminary plat review provided that:
a. Common open space shall not be decreased by more
than fifteen percent (15%), provided that the
requirements of section 4.7 and 19.6.1 of the
Zoning Ordinance shall be met;
b. The concepts of the Planned Development as they
relate to the general location of types of land
uses, circulation patterns, etc., are adhered to;
c. The total number of permitted units and/or density
of the development is not increased;
d. Regulations as contained herein are adhered to.
2. Any residential tract may be developed as patio, town
house, apartment or single family home provided that
the total number of units in the development does not
exceed fourteen hundred (1400) units in the 356.8 acres
shown on the Master Plan.
3.
Open space linkages shall be at least thirty (30) feet
wide.
I .. ¡
4. All residential tracts of more than fifty (50) dwelling
units shall have at least two points of access,
provided that the Planning Director may take exceptions
at the time of site or preliminary plat review under
criteria set forth in Section 32.3.11 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
5. Specific plans for the development of any tract shall
conform to the review requirements of the Albemarle
County Planing Department and will address drainage,
erosion control, landscaping of any parking lots,
specific road alignments, cut and fill, and any other
requirements of the County and shall be subject to the
normal review process for preliminary plats, final
plats or site plans.
6. No uses shall be permitted except for irrigation
purposes which would use any water or sewer system
other than the Albemarle County Public water or sewer
system.
IV-7
I ATTACHMENT 81
page 2\
7. The applicant shall install a uniform and effective signage
system throughout the development and will, at the
appropriate time, submit a complete signage concept to the
Planning Director for review and approval.
8. Interpretations and clarifications of this application may be
made by the Planning Director, without the necessity for
amendment provided that the general intent, concept,
densities, land use pattern, etc. of the textual statement
and Master Plan are adhered to.
9. Lot Guidelines
a. Single-family lots may front on and have direct access
onto the spine road where topographic conditions and
other site constraints dictate.
b. Frontage on cul-de-sac may be reduced to thirty-five
(35) feet (as utilized in Forest Lakes).
c. Access easements shall be provided to any lots that do
not front directly onto the road or street.
d. Flag lots shall be permitted (as utilized in Forest
Lakes).
10. Setbacks
a. Front Yard:
I
I
I
I
I
Depth of front yard shall be no less than twenty-five
, .. (25) feet except that the front yard may be reduced to
ten (10) feet for a maximum lineal distance of thirty
percent (30%) of the front lot width provided that
there shall be no openings except for garage door in
any exterior wall of the enclosed structure parallel
to the street between twenty five (25) feet and ten (10)
feet from the front lot line and that such reductions may
not be made on more than three (3) adjacent lots nor on
more than forty percent (40%) of the lots.
b. Side Yard:
Depth of side yard shall be no less than ten (10)
feet except that for patio homes, each lot shall have two
side yards whose sum shall be no less than fifteen (15)
feet such that one required side shall be no less
than two (2) feet (provided that there shall be no
wall openings of the house into a side yard which is less
than seven (7) feet and that the other required side yard
!
I!
;i
I'
I,
IV-8
¡¡
¡ ~
I'
II
¡j
ijl
!!
<fJ ¡
,
.
I
.
i
~
I~
R
!
.
,
¡
I
I
I
\
.
be no less than thirteen (13) feet, provided however,
that all houses on adjoining lots shall,have a minimum of
fifteen (15) feet between them. The minimum distance
distance between buildings may be reduced to eight (8)
feet (and the required yards likewise provided that the
corners of the buildings overlap not more than fourteen
(14) feet; that there are no openings in one of such walls
at such a location; that there shall be no more than four
adjacent units with the side yards so reduced; and that no
side yard shall be less than two (2) feet.
c. Corner Side Yard:
Depth of side yard of lots located at street intersections
with common open space of a minimum width of fifteen (15)
feet between the lot and one of the street's right-of-way
may be reduced to seven and one-half (7.5) feet.
d. Rear Yard
Depth of rear yard shall be no less than twenty (20) feet
except in cases in which the rear lot abuts common open
space, then the rear yard of such a lot may be reduced to
ten (10) feet.
, ~,.
IV-g
./
'1 ?/¿~ ...
9s-, ð'll2. '?l 7
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5823
March 29, 1995
William D. Finley
Rt. 1, Box 255
Free Union, VA 22940
RE: SP-94-32 Free Union Baptist Church
Dear Mr. Finley:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March 28, 1995, unanimously
recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please note that
this approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. The cemetery shall be limited to the existing cemetery area and that area shown on a plan
of the Free Union Baptist Memorial Cemetery west section dated 4/20/93 and initialed
WDF,3/8/95. Use of the area shown as "reserved for future cemetery development" shall
require amendment of this permit;
2. Compliance with all Health Department regulations.
Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and
receive public comment at their meeting on Aorill9. 1995. Any new or additional information
regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least
seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
1/$-/~
William D. Fritz
Senior Planner
WDF/jcw
cc: Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins
Ella Carey
STAFF PERSON:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
WILLIAM D. FRITZ
MARCH 28, 1995
APRIL 12, 1995
SP 94-32 FREE UNION BAPTIST CHURCH AND MEMORIAL
CEMETERY
Applicant's Proposal:
The applicant is proposing to expand the Church cemetery to allow for additional area.
Petition: Free Union Baptist Church petitions the Board of Supervisors to issue a special use
permit to permit the expansion of an existing cemetery located on 2.85 acres zoned RA, Rural
Areas [10.2.2(32)]. Property, described as Tax Map 29, Parcel 26, is located on the north side of
Route 609 approximately 900 feet west of Route 601 in the White Hall Magisterial District. This
site is not located in a designated growth area (Rural Area 1).
Character of the Area:
A portion of this site is currently used as a cemetery. The nearest dwellings to this site are
located approximately 200 feet distant on the opposite side of Route 609. The nearest dwelling
to this site on the same side of Route 609 is approximately 400 feet distant. The church is
located on a piece of property separated from the cemetery by a private road.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has reviewed this request for compliance with the provisions of Section 31.2.4.1 of the
Zoning Ordinance and recommends approval.
Plannin~ and Zonin~ History:
No history on activity requiring County approvals is available.
The site has been used for a cemetery and church for a number of years. The cemetery has been
used since the Civil War. This site is not a registered historic feature. Expansion of the cemetery
should not impact the existing cemetery.
1
Comprehensive Plan:
The Comprehensive Plan notes this area as a Rural Area. The plan contains no comments related
to the proposed special use permit. The Comprehensive Plan, Open Space Plan, notes this area
as farmland and forest. No other features are identified in the open space plan.
ST AFF COMMENT:
Staff will address each provision of Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The Board of Supervisors hereby reserves unto itself the right to issue all special use
permits permitted hereunder. Special use permits for uses as provided in this ordinance
may be issued upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such use will not be of
substantial detriment to adiacent property.
The proposed activity should have virtually no impact on adjacent property as the current
cemetery exists and this will be an expansion of that use.
that the character of the district will not be changed thereby.
The area proposed for a cemetery is adjacent to the existing cemetery and is a relatively
flat field. Based on the existing site characteristics the proposed use should not change
the character of the district.
and that such use will be in harmony with the pUqJose and intent of this ordinance.
Staff has reviewed the purpose and intent of the Ordinance and the Rural Areas and finds
no conflict between the proposed use and the intent of the Ordinance.
with the uses permitted by right in the district.
The proposed use will not affect permitted uses on adjacent property.
with additional regulations provided in Section 5.0 of this ordinance.
Section 5.0 contains no additional regulations.
2
and with the public health. safety and general welfare.
The applicant has provided a layout of the proposed cemetery expansion. The layout
provided indicates that all health department regulations may be met. Staff has
recommended a condition requiring compliance with all health department regulations
and the applicant is aware of these regulations. An entrance is currently in place to serve
the existing cemetery and the Department of Transportation has stated that this use will
have "no impact to the infrastructure of highway." Based on these observations this use
may be considered consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff is unable to identify any negative issues for this request. Staff opinion is that the proposed
use is consistent with Section 31.2.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance and therefore, staff recommends
approval of this request subject to the following conditions:
Recommended Conditions of Approval:
1. The cemetery shall be limited to the existing cemetery area and that area shown on a plan
of the Free Union Baptist Memorial Cemetery west section dated 4/20/93 and initialed
WDF,3/8/95. Use of the area shown as "reserved for future cemetery development" shall
require amendment of this permit;
2. Compliance with all Health Department regulations.
----------------
A TT ACHMENTS:
A - Location Map
B - Tax Map
C - Sketch
I :\GENERAL \SHARE\JANICE\SP9432.RPT
3
\.
..
LIT/I E
FLAT
~..I"~I)'
....
[",",r'~ "-- ,~:
.~1~ 628
'~_I" -- o~..............
.,"'~~ .'.-.......
11:;IU ~ Booneslt.¡¡. ~' tr/lL!I"
"" .. ' ,;" om""," : --=--;:..,
(;;:;¡~j _ ... ... ;;;:;-r" '2' ,5" _ Nortoo",,,.
~ [hil] '@I
(JIlISUN MOUNTAIN »
G
..
~
"
v~
o
G
ATI'ACHMENT
A
.,
~~ I)r¡
ct;~ /'
J
~
~
t\t
:. I
~
~¡:..\'.'t-
c
n
1~I~j~¡
[fill \\,
0-1;;' 'Q'..
ŒID "l\irc
..
...............
o
".
(¡
t\t
r
¡§f !~~¡
~ ¡BIO SP 94
.1'" Free 32
,,~v:¡;¡;"] ~ Union Bapt'
~ ,_~ I leV",' _ 1st Church
_ ~~. Muo",'." _, ,," , ¿' ........ ... ·i
\.:) ',' _ _ J' _,'" ' '\.·;..r~!1l (lin!
... foU] '" ... ~ ...! ';" "
'" _' .,1673 810' \ r ".., "
, ' \/""1 [6681
)~ ~~~.~' (~:~I- '
¡"II 1\" I<,;;¡/ ^' I
',,. I /(j' J
¡:;; ,0."...,,,. <'01- 'g
, ,,,à, , 'Qo I ¡ ],""1
...\~~. _~ \, '~fl'
J16l~ I __-;1'" [",., .'0'· ,'" ... c" I ~
,;.¡ i ,> BIÌ ." .
... ,_ 6/4/· . \ - 1- ,
~ ,.., _. &.~, 'è\ \ ~-í' - '
"" .... _ .L,..tV
...~ or -
Rt.'dbllcJ
Eult
",
/p}:ll~--
. . '. .
. . I
. I
.:t'@ I
·'W·- :
./.</ {BIB] I
../, . I
~{/~V' I
,
0""\p..,"
~o
p..\:.'-
,c,'<-
'\
í~
,,-'>i'
,'I-
j
ALBEMARLE
coUt· -.
~. ,
A'ITACHMENT B
~..
SEE
28-3-""
OJ¡ _ _ 0
$CAL.E IN F[[T
...
'400
.
43
WHITE HALL AND
JACK JOUETT DISTRICTS
SECTION 29
... ·"'OORMAN'SRIVER AGRICULTURALBFORESTAL OISTRICT'
3-28-95
1
MARCH 28, 1995
The Albemarle County Planning Commission held a public hearing on Tuesday, March
28, 1995, Room 7, County Office Building, Charlottesville, Virginia. Those members
present were: Ms. Babs Huckle; Mr. Tom Blue, Chair; Mr. Bill Nitchmann; Ms.
Katherine Imhoff, Vice Chair; and Mr. Bruce Dotson. Other officials present were: Mr.
Wayne Cilimberg, Director of Planning and Community Development; Mr. Bill Fritz,
Senior Planner; Mr. Ron Lilley, Senior Planner; and Mr. LaITy Davis, County Attorney.
Absent: Commissioners Jenkins and Vaughan.
The minutes of March 14, 1995 were unanimously approved as amendeâ.
-----------------------------------------
CONSENT AGENDA
Addition to Panorama Agricultural/Forestal District
MOTION: Ms. Imhoff moved that the Consent Agenda be accepted. Ms. Huckle
seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
__~__~~~~___._~____M___________~_____~___
Free Union Baptist Church and Memorial Cemetery - Request for a special use
permit to permit the expansion of an existing cemetery located on 2.85 acres zoned
RA, Rural Areas [10.2.2(32)). Property, described as Tax Map 29, Parcel 26, is
located on the north side of Route 609 approximat~ly 900 feet west of Route 601 in
the V\lhite Hall Magisterial District. This site is no~ located in a designated growth area
(Rural Area 1).
Mr. Fritz presented the staff report. Staff recommended approval subject to
conditions.
The applicant was represented by Mr. William Finley. He explained that the church
has formed a non-profit corporation, in accordance with State Code, which will operate
the cemetery.
No public comment was offered.
Mr. Dotson asked if staff had any concerns about the back portion of the property
which is being reserved for future cemetery expansion. He wondered if it was
necessary for the applicant to have to come before the Commission again, when
expansion is needed, or if the entire property could be considered at this time. Mr.
Fritz responded that the entire property could be considered if that was the
Commission's desire. He explained: "The only reason we put that on there was to
...
3-28-95
2
limit it. VVhat is shown as the cemetery is the existing open area. The detail of that
plan starts to give out as you get into that area and it is harder for me to guarantee
that all the Health Department regulations, etc., could be met with ease in those
areas. But you could allow them to get into those areas· if you maintained that Health
Department requirement." Mr. Fritz stressed that he did not believe there were any
issues of concern about the back portion of the property, but he could not say, "with.
certainty," that there are none.
MOTION: Ms. Imhoff moved that SP-94-32 for Free Union Baptist Church and
Memorial Cemetery be recommended to the Board of Supervisors for approval subject
to the following conditions:
1. The cemetery shall be limited to the existing cemetery area and that area shown
on a plan of the Free Union Baptist Memorial Cemetery west section dated 4/20/93
and initialed WDF, 3/8/95. Use of the area shown as "reserved for future cemetery
development" shall require amendment of this permit.
2. Compliance with all Health Department regulations.
Ms. Huckle seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
-----------------------------------------
//
~.
/
Mþ qKER WITH BLOCK
LETTER AT N. CORNEA~
I \
F
¡;,
i
L"
1
.1
,~\
~I
-1--1<1- ~,,-IO'---I
~210~
I
TYPICAL BLOCK
WITH 16 PLOTS
A'IT.ACHMENT C
= -
~ tnTT ..
~
~'
"n
.-J
2" BORDER
~
o'
.,
--
S 73- 251 05··W 210.00'
FOR FUTURE CEWE , DEVEl
/ /
--
FREE UNION BAPTIST MEMORIAL CEMETERY
WEST SECTION, BEING A 1.00 ACRE
PORTION OF PARCEL TM 29 - 26
DB 838/629 - -
- -
--
- -
IROhFOUND
-
- I -- - - - - - --
- - - - - -
WILLIAM DRAKE
TM29·2L
DB 1230lIl9
-
-
""-
......
--
-
-
- - - -- - -----
- - - - -
- -- -
------------
BRUSH LINE ~ _ _ _ _
---- ------~-------- ---
- -
-
--=- -=-.: .::--
- -
-, r, -.,
5 y. i ~ -"':::>0-
WILLIAM DRAKE
TM29·2M
-..
1190
'---
;. IRp~~,SE1 .............
- -- ------- / ------
---- ---- ~
-¡¡if _
- -
-
-
-
-
~
/
/
20' DRJVEWA Y (G......I
,/
/
/
FREE UNION BAPTIST
MEMORIAL CEMETERY
EAST SECTION
-
-.=--
-.-. ""-
1. '!'Us S1JRYET nows 1 on 1CU PQlTIo. or 'UaL TK u..u nIC!
DCLØÞI.S 'I'ß nu VII. urnlT c:nRct LOT UD 'I'D I%ISTDIC
nu uwtOll ana CDIftDT. TB lLOa . ,tDT Ll.TOUT non CMI'
'l'lIS DUWI1IG UPIISIIT U aTØSIOII or 'rß J:D:STDG CDITII'Y
!'OR 1 DUCU1"TIc. or ft 29-25 IU ·,u,. StonlfC 'I'DD ,ucn:
loUD COI"f'KftD IT nLL or mTI InRUSS an' ItTUlTD 1T nn
Ull'Iœ IJf J.LIDULI CCIOIT!'. U.' IT .. K. roSTD.. CLS. UD Dl":'
-...
"-
~-~ -& 'øø
- ~ ~ -13_/~- .~
/?
o
'"
êi
.,
-
"-
-
;.,
o<òL
¡:.
- -
2
,
4'
o I~~T
;6 t 26 t
~I, _ _~G_ 3 ; HH__
i8 4 B -- ,
-
r
FF
_-800. --. .... ......
2
"3
:- -=--;;! --
---š
- -
9
Õ
I
.
2
4
j,/" r '
. I ,
rj' 3
,
\ íI '
\ /ü JJ '3
\....~ ~4 14 14 ~~4 14 ----š l
'- _ _ ...- -eoo__
15 15 15 7 15 i5 .......- -.
"Q Ih" ~ ~ 8 16 / - -- -- -- -.... __
9 '9 '9 I 9 EXlS'T1NG HEADSTONES
, , U 10 2 iõ - - - 2 - iõ 2 10 / /
-~ ~- -
II - .... 'j'iT 3 ¡¡-- ..... 311
\, _ '...::::;...... _ _ ..... _ ___ _ _5. - -;;,'-
\. 12 4~r.... 412 412 .....
,ÌI'3 8- ---g~ 0 0 ~E ... - /
RESERVED PARKING \. \.J ~ --"61 ~ - - 6 14 " 14 6 ~ - ~
(2 SlOe.. HanGlcappeG) Ü- I - - - - - ~ /
OTMEF: PARKING IN F.U.B. \ 15--- _1_ _ __ ----¡¡ ¡;-- 10 7 - JO __ _ ____-7 10 ___-- -- ,. 7 15
, CHURCII LOT: 60 SPACES +/. 16 -. - ~ ¡r-:::- _ _ _ 16 B 16 B 16 8 16
70.00 I - - - -
_ __ _ IRO'ISET c:::::::::; - <:::::::7 ~ - -_.~...;.N73·2005E 210.00 ~
1:- - - ~' EXISTING - - - - - - - ~. - - -... ----.:. . - -::::....:::.-. R.O.W.
_ _ _ -_ __ ~N2~~N~~ _ -=M~ :-:..___ - - - - ·0 _ _ . ~.~." ."'::;:.~~, - ~ _ -:-- -
- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - --.. _.. -
________-- ---':'/E/P - ....-:---- - - - ~:'?:.;.'~;;. - ,II ¡......
~
"
9 Ë S "" .- 9 9
iõ 2 10 2 10 ,,2 10 2 2 iõ 10
iT 3 II ;); II 3 II '3 iT 3 fiT 3 II
~N~: M ;: :/L~l K~ ~J~C= I~: H
7 -, 'f
B Š
2.
!. SDUBBnT ~ mlC1TID 'l'lDSLT IS 'fOIl SELEC':'"
.... 'I'D UST IOUIfDUT or ftE CDI"I'IIT lIOn I'J nIS },UnllG (10.
IS .50 rT. nOlI '!'Ø IIDlaT RIoL. UD ]SQ ". nOlI Tn: ftl.I.l':'
DUDrULD. lOTI or nra 10 LOC1Tl%l 0Ir Tn nø RIOII' IJ.PT:
aul.CI LOT LTI'IG un or '!'II CDftftT.
5. .VlRUS! JUllCII:, 1 ftIltJTUT or PIDT In eun. IS 3500 n. r.
OT Tn nIT aamrDI.lY or 'rD CDft'ftT.
2
3
9
iõ
i
r-
6
';
Š
v
o
¡¡
- -4
'5
"6
7
Š
~IËf
B
T
E I~·~
_ ~- - t _ 2[6,6
, EE -
. "
," t 41L-
9 I ¡s--
10 2 p0-
113m---
12 .; _ 4!¡z--
,/ s - 10< - -
,~ SF
: 6E
15 7 F
iõ F
2
3'
2
3'
}
---s
¡¡
p 5'
6
7'
2
3'
4
o
.,.6
;; '1
R
2
14
711'5
s1h6
S 73 2!" OS"" W 186.
O~I~O IESr= I
š------t 26 I 26 26 t i
,,--AA J ' SS 3 ,7 .. GiG 3,7 _ _ _D,o~
8_ 41L 411~.... '+11: ..
~ r-- ~/" ~
o ho- 0 0
j ~ i i
z-::-
4
5'
6'
Q
2
3'
4
15
6'
13
4
10
iõ
4
'5
6
7
ã
/
-
o
~,
~I
Ò
.<Y.
&
..
1\
;.,
"
o'
::
2
3
"
,
\
RJ,ì>
VV
c~.;$'· .'
'" .' ~
-Öþ ",,,,. D"i
...,;: ....~ ø
~~
C>
FREE UNION BAPTIST MEMORIAL CEMEi
WEST SECTION
~SURVEY' BLOCK a PLOT LAYe
ELlM ASSOCIATES
_ ENGINEERS AND SURVEYOR~
FREE UNION, VA.
,-!-:~ ~
......','....
~..p....~ .
,,~~~=:.~
',,- .. o.K 21 2'r or
FREE UNION 0.25 mí. "'" "IIM"
~"'.JIO
--0
-
4
f
"
-
_c___ _
6'
594
/
-..,.............,
3'
:::-
-
-
rC'lÎ
-
,
"
,
,
,
\
,
IRON S~T~83'
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does hereby
set the County Levy for the taxable year 1995 for General County purposes at Seventy-
Two Cents ($0.72) on every One Hundred Dollars worth of real estate; at Four Dollars
and Twenty-Eight Cents ($4.28) on every One Hundred Dollars worth of assessed value
of personal property; at Four Dollars and Twenty-Eight Cents ($4.28) on every One
Hundred Dollars worth of assessed value of machinery and tools; and at Seventy-Two
Cents ($0.72) on every One Hundred Dollars worth of assessed value of public service
assessments; and
FURTHER orders that the Director of Finance of Albemarle County assess and collect on all
taxable real estate and all taxable personal property, including machinery and tools not
assessed as real estate, used or employed in a manufacturing business, not taxable by the
State on Capital; including Public Service Corporation property except the rolling stock
of railroads based upon the assessment fixed by the State Corporation Commission and
certified by it to the Board of Supervisors both as to location and valuation; and including
all boats and watercraft under five tons as set forth in the Code of Virginia; and vehicles
used as mobile homes or offices as set forth in the Virginia Code; except farm machinery,
farm tools, farm livestock, and household goods as set forth in the Code of Virginia,
Section 58.1-3500 through Section 58.1-3508.
* * * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of
a resolution unanimously adopted by the Board of County Supervisors, Albemarle County,
Virginia, at a regular held meeting on April 12, 1995.
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that
the operations budget for the County for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 1995, be
approved as follows:
General Government Administration
Judicial
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Development
Parks, Recreation and Culture
Community Development
County/City Revenue Sharing
Refunds
Capital Improvements
Education - Operations
Education - Self-Sustaining Funds
Education - Debt Service
Capital/Debt Service Reserve
Contingency Reserve
$ 4,796,974
1,667,903
7,966,802
2,021,441
5,074,511
2,803,880
2,201,941
5,049,991
41,000
2,300,000
63,774,854
5,895,827
6,845,880
250,000
62.126
TOTAL
$ 110,753,130
* * * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true,
correct copy of a resolution unanimously adopted by the Board of County
Supervisors, Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular held meeting on April
12, 1995.
C.,;
<f?'jS-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
GENDA TITLE:
Y 1995-96 Budget Resolution/1995 Tax Levy
esolution
AGENDA DATE:
April 12, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
9~~ ()'II,,;) . '3/%
7' ~-. (J Cf I ~":3/CJ
INFORMAtIóN:
ACTION: X
SUBJECTIPROPOSALIRE UEST:
Y 1995-96 Operating Budget and set the County tax
evy for 1995.
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT:
ucker, White
ATTACHMENTS: yes
REVŒWEDBy:If~~
DISCUSSION:
Attached for your approval are two resolutions that must be approved at the April 12 meeting;
I. Resolution to Approve the FY 1995-96 Operatin2 Bud2et
The first resolution, which is the first attachment, formally approves the proposed expenditures for FY 1995-96, which are shown by major
category or function and total $110,753,130. Several adjustments have been made to the proposed budget since the final worksession, which
do not change the General Fund bottom line, but do increase the Board's reserve fund from $27,373 to $69,126. These changes,
summarized on the second attachment, are as follows:
County Executive AdjustmentsJo the proposed budget include (-$1,2181) in minor recalculations, an addition of$44,619 due ta the
one-year Civil Engineer position being counted in error in both the baseline budget and as an expanded position, and a reducwon of
(-$31,360) to restore a vacant patrol officer position that was inadvertently omitted from the budget. The net result of these adjustments is
$11,978 added to the Board's reserve account.
Board of Supenisor Adjustments, the second set of proposed changes on the sheet. shows the transfer of $13,086 from a contingency
account set up for the Joint Security Complex stipends and $24,289 for the Northside Reference Librarian, both of which were not funded
by the City. The final change is a decrease of (-$7,600) from your reserve account to fund the County's additional share of the Family
Partners Program, a request from City Council in return for their agreement to fund the additional $7,000 share of the Teen Center
requested by the County. This seems to be a fair compromise, since our budgeted share of the Family Partners Program at $7,590 was based
on a 20/80 split with the City, although our actual share of services is more in the range of 30/70, the same approximate ratio, although
reversed, as the City and the County at the Teen Center. The additional $7,600 will increase our share of the Family Partners Program to
40%; the City's additional contribution of$7,000 will increase their share of the Teen Center to 40%.
The net adjustments provide an additional $29,775 to the Board's Reserve Fund for a total reserve fund of $69,126.
The School Budget Adjustment reflected at the bottom of the sheet is a reduction of $10,000 in state basic aid revenues in the School
Fund, which reduces the total bottom line of the County's budget to $110,753,130.
IL Resolution to Set the County Levv.
The second resolution, the third attachment, sets the tax levy for the taxable year 1995. The proposed rates are the same as the current year
and are set at $.072 for the real estate tax rate and $4.28 for the personal property tax rate.
RECOMMENDATION:
If there are no further additions or deletions to the budget than those proposed above, staff requests..}'Ow:.'W~roval of the attached
resolutions. r; ('i Πa ,.--..
APR - 7 f99)
95.060
~" "
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, that the
operations budget for the County for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 1995, be approved
as follows:
General Government Administration
Judicial
Public Safety
Public Works
Human Development
Parks, Recreation and Culture
Community Development
County/City Revenue Sharing
Refunds
Capital Improvements
Education - Operations
Education - Self-Sustaining Funds
Education - Debt Service
Capital/Debt Service Reserve
Contingency Reserve
$ 4,796,974
1,667,903
7,966,802
2,021,441
5,067,511
2,803,880
2,201,941
5,049,991
41,000
2,300,000
63,774,854
5,895,827
6,845,880
250,000
69.126
TOTAL
$ 110,753,130
*************
RWW/dbm
95.037
..
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' FY 1995-96 PROPOSED BUDGET
I. FY 1995-96 TOTAL COUNTY BUDGET
PROPOSED ADOPTED
II. PROPOSED CHANGES FROM PROPOSED TO ADOPTED GENERAL FUND
OPERATING BUDGET
BEGINNING RESERVE FUND (BOARD RESERVE) 27,373
27,373
COUNTY EXECUTIVE ADJUSTMENTS
Miscellaneous Adjustments in PersonneV Operating Costs
Elimination of Double Counted Civil Engineer II Position
Restoration of Inadvertently Eliminated Police Patrol Position
Subtotal County Executive Adjustments
(1,281)
44,619
(31,360)
11,978
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS
Elimination of Joint Security Complex Contingency Fund for Stipends
Elimination of Northside Reference Librarian Position
Family Partners Match Adjustment
Subtotal Board of Supervisors' Proposed Adjustments
13,086
24,289
2~~~g)
RESERVE FUND AFTER ADJUSTMENTS
27.373
69.126
III. PROPOSED CHANGES FROM PROPOSED TO ADOPTED SCHOOL BUDGET
Reduction in School Fund Operating Budget due to Decrease in Revenues
(10,000)
IV. PROPOSED FY 1995-96 B.O.C.S. ADOPTED BUDGET
TOTAL GEN FUND
TOTAL SCHOOL FUND
41,082,449
69,680,681
41,082,449
69,670,681
TOTAL COUNTY BUDGET
110.763.130 110.753.130
TAX RATES:
P.P . RATE $4.28
R.E. RATE $.72
04/06/95
FINADOPT.WK4
04:23 PM
/ ...
City of Charlottesville
I\Pí~. \ 4 1995
April 11, 1995
The Honorable Walter F. Perkins
Chairman
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Dear Walter:
Thank you for your letter of March 22, 1995. After careful consideration following our second
public hearing on April3, 1995, we agreed to the following:
· Funding for the Teen Center will be split according to the compromise proposed in your
letter (41.5% City and 58.5% County). The City's contribution for FY 1995-96 will be
$34,466. In addition, the City proposes that funding for the Family Partners program be
split 60%/40% with the County (as opposed to the 80%/20% proposed by the agency).
Council also proposes that both of these programs, originally funded on a 50/50 basis, be
evaluated during the budget review process and that funding requests be adjusted to
reflect each locality's level of client participation.
· The City did not set aside a 2% stipend for Joint Security Complex employees funded by
the State Compensation Board.
· The City has reserved $46,000 to support the expenses of its representatives on the joint
City/County/University Narcotics Unit if and when asset seizure monies are no longer
available.
· City funding for the Jefferson-Madison Library will remain as proposed ($749,778 for
library operations and $35,655 for Monticello Avenue Virtual Village).
· City funding for the Joint Security Complex will remain at $298,594 as originally
proposed. City Council will reconsider the issue if a request for additonal funding is
made by the Jail Board.
_/ .....
Thank you for forwarding the Board's recommendations; they were useful to us during our
deliberations. If you, other members of the Board, or staff members have questions, please feel
free to call me.
Sinc~ // /~
()jÛ(/~
David J. Toscano
Mayor
cc: Mr. Robert Tucker
Ms. Roxanne White
COUNTYOFALBE~E
.
/
'I' 1 ,Cj~
APh ., 7 î995
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
",
Y 1995-96 Capital Improvement Budget
AGENDA DATE:
April 12, 1995
ITEM NUMBER:
9'1. /2.D? ,~
ACTION: X
INFORMATION: X
: Request Approval of
Y 1995-96 Capital Improvement Budget
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: yes
. Tucker, White
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
At its February 1 meeting, the Board of Supervisors approved the proposed FY 1995-96 - FY 1999-00 Capital Improvement Program of
$60.4 million, but deferred fmal approval of the Fiscal Year 1995-96 budget of $1 0,556,729 until after the operating budget worksessions in
order to give the Board an opportunity to revise the CIP budget if needed during budget discussions. There have been no changes or revisions
in the FY 1995-96 CIP projects or budgets since that time.
DISCUSSION:
The breakdown of the FY 1995-96 budget of$10,556,729 by major function and revenue sources is shown in the table below:
Expenditures by Function FY 95196 FY 95196 - 99/00
Administration 518,081 1,179,091
Fira,Rescue, Safety 910,800 2,345,893
Highways, Transportation 503,000 2,902,000
Libraries 40,000 499,447
Par1ælRecleation 559,178 2,385,205
Education (General Govt) 62,335 62,335
School Division Projects 7,853,335 47,898,480
Solid Waste 110,000 1,300,000
Contingency 0 1,815,525
I TOTAL EXPENDITURES '1),556,729 60,387,976~
Existing Resources FY 95196 FY 95196 . 99/00
CIP Fund Balance 290,794 1,326,896
General Fund Appropriations 2,300,000 12,600,000
E- 911 Revenues 340,800 340,800
State Funds (Rivanna) 0 250,000
Miscellaneous 121,800 521,800
VPSA Bonds 7,503,335 30,348,480
Split Billing 0 15,000,000
I TOTAL RESOURCES '1),556,729 60,387,976~
Further information is provided on the attached sheets, which includes a more detailed sheet on expenditures and revenues for the 5-year
period and a brief description of each of the projects funded in the FY 1995-96 Capital Improvement Budget.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the FY 1995-96 Capital Improvements Budget in the amount of $ 10,556,729 as presented above.
RWW/rww
9S.059
FY 95/96 - 99/00 APPROVED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Summary of Projects
FY95-96
FY 96-97
FY 97 -98
FY 98-99
FY 99-00
TOTAL
Administration 518,081 421,010 140,000 50,000 50,000 1,179,091
Fire,Rescue, Safety 910,800 306,242 628,851 250,000 250,000 2,345,893
Highways, Transportation 03,000 532,000 678,650 684,350 504,000 2,902,000
libraries 40,000 28,500 375,947 30,000 25,000 499,447
Parks/Recreation 559,178 639,397 159,400 59,000 968,230 2,385,205
Education (General Govt) 62,335 0 0 0 0 62,335
School Division Projects 7,853,335 18,369,345 15,176,270 4,680,830 1,818,700 47,898,480
Solid Waste 110,000 260,000 210,000 310,000 410,000 1,300,000
Contingency 0 112,025 159,000 863,500 681,000 1,815,525
TOTAL PROJECTS 10,556,721 20,668,519 17 ,528,118 6,127,680 4,706,930 60,387,976
Existing Resources
CIP FUND BALANCE * 240,794 249,174 201,848 196,850 188,230 1,076,896
# GEN FUND APPROPRIATIONS 2,300,000 2,300,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 12,600,000
RESCUE PAYMENT 21,800 0 0 0 21,800
INTEREST EARNED 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000
E-911 REVENUES 340,800 340,800
STORNNVATER FUND BALANCE 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 0 0
STATE FUNDS (Rivanna) 0 250,000 250,000
JAIL PRIOR FUNDS/BONDS 0 ° 0 0
VPSA BONDS ,503,335 2,969,345 14,676,270 4,080,830 1,118,700 30,348,480
SPLIT BILLING 15,000,000 15,000,000
TOTAL RESOURCES 10,556,721 20,668,519 17 ,528,118 6,927,680 4,706,930 60,387,976
REQUESTED PROJECTS 20,668,519 17 ,528 ,1. 6,927,680 4,706,930 60,387,976
OVER/(SHORT) 0 0 0 0 0
ACCUMULATED OVER/(SHORT) 0 0 0 0
School Projects
New High School 00 7,800,000 12,820,350 23,020,350
WAHS Renovations 0 843,650 80,000 1,030,200 2,897,500
AHS Phase II, Phase III 0 539,000 20,000 249,000 1,815,000
Woodbrook Renovation ,000 1,750,550 0 0 0 1,950,550
Cale Addition 78,000 680,000 0 758,000
Stony Poiint Renovation/Addition 0,000 1,048,000 0 0 0 1,118,000
Brownsville Renovation 0,000 1,199,470 0 0 0 1,299,470
Crozet Addition 80,000 714,890 0 0 794,890
Murray High Renovation 95,000 0 70,000 755,000 0 920,000
Northem Elementary 0 0 0 25,000 300,000 325,000
Red Hill Expansion 0 0 0 300,000 300,000
VHF Underground storage tanks 0 0 180,000 180,000 360,000
CA TEC ADA Compliance 0 14,000 14,000
Burley Roof Replacement 140,000 140,000
ADA structural changes 186,485 186,485 425,000 0 797,970
Instructional Technology 1,080,000 939,000 605,070 544,480 489,700 3,658,250
Administrative Technology 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 350,000
Vehicular Maintenance Facility Reco 0 17,500 294,000 143,000 0 454,500
Security Systems - all schools 44,900 44,900
Mainte nance/Replacement 1,358,300 2,566,800 611,850 1,864,150 479,000 6,880,100
SUBTOTAL 7,853,335 .,369,345 15,176,270 4,680,830 1,8.,700 47,898,480
SUMMARY OF FY 1995-96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Administration and Courts
County Office Building ADA Renovations. Modifications to comply with ADA regula-
tions, which includes modifying bathrooms, replacing door knobs, replacing/adding sig-
nage, installing listening stations, lowering counter sections to accommodate wheelchairs
and modifying City/ County buildings. No impact on the operating budget. Total estimated
5-year project cost is $103,320.
Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal System (CAMA). An on-line financial system for 1)
the total management of all property assessments, 2) the generation of accurate, defensible
property values using land cost, market and income approaches, and 3) the integration of
geographic data bases with computerized maps including tax maps, zoning districts, etc.
Operating costs associated with CAMA are expected to be between $29,200 - $29,800/year,
which includes hardware and maintenance costs ($4,200-$4,800) and software subscription
costs ($25,000). This project is funded at 100% in FY 95/96.
Health Department Clinic Wing. Addition and renovation of existing space that were
included in the original design of the Clinic Wing, but which were deleted due to budget
constraints. These renovations include the design and construction of a storeroom and
loading dock ($75,000) and the construction of a circular driveway that connects to the rear
parking lots ($85,000). No impact on the operating cost is anticipated. This project is funded
at 100% in FY 95/96, to be matched with equal funds from the City.
Replacement of Voting Machines. Completion of replacement of all mechanical lever
voting machines with direct recording electronic voting machines. It is estimated that a total
of 57 machines will be needed. Current machines are old and problem-ridden. No impact
on the operating cost is anticipated. This project is funded at 50% in FY 95/96.
General Government Computer Upgrade. To provide microcomputers and central net-
work connections for County staff, a backup power system for mainframe equipment, key
central microcomputer network equipment, and an imaging system for the County Office
Building. The impact on the FY 95/96 operating budget is expected to be $11,550. This
project is funded at 29% in FY 95/96.
County Office Bldg. Maintenance/Repairs. Provide an emergency power source to
lower/open an elevator during a power loss and replace roofing in two locations over the
north wing. No impact on the operating budget is anticipated. This project is funded at 28%
in FY 95/96.
Fire, Rescue and Safety
Police Computer System. The Police Department currently is operating on 1986 software
and mainframe technology that does communicate with the Department's IBM S36 Mini
which holds all crime information data. Additionally, there is a need to prepare for interface
of Computer Aided Dispatch system and provide usable data in a timely manner to officers,
administration and citizens. The ability to store, retrieve and analyze criminal, traffic,
personnel, and financial data has become critical. The impact on the operating budget is
expected to be $6,200/year for maintenance and electricity. (No operating costs are expected
for FY95-96, however.) This project is funded at 55% in FY 95-96.
$52,160.
$75,000
$80,000
$110,000
$155,000
$45,921
$70,000
FirelRescue Building/Equipment Fund. Fund for the construction of a new County fIre
station to provide service to parts of Albemarle County experiencing rapid growth and
increasing number of fIre/rescue service calls, and the purchase of an aerial ladder truck.
The potential impact on the operating budget is unknown at this time. This project is funded
at 20% in FY 95-96.
Fire Pumper Replacement. Replace a 1976 Ward Lafrance Pumper that currently has
133,000 miles, and will no longer pass National Fire Protection Association certifIcations.
No impact on the operating budget is anticipated. The original request was $325,000, which
was reduced on the basis that $250,000 would completely fund this project.
Emergency Operations Center Building. Site development and construction of a new
building for E-911 Emergency Operations Center (EOC) on land/property donated by the
University of Virginia. Cost of building construction is being paid for by revenues generated
from the City/County E-911 telephone line surcharge. The potential impact of this project
on the operating budget is unknown at this time. This project is funded at 100% in FY 95/96,
to be matched equally with the City and a smaller contribution from the University.
Highw2\Ys & Transportation
Revenue Sharing Road Projects. Each year the County participates in the Revenue Sharing
Program n which the State provides funds to match County funds for the construction,
maintenance, or improvement of secondary roads. These projects provide an additional
infusion of cash into the Six Year Secondary Plan which allows particular projects to be
constructed in a year in which they otherwise would not be constructed. The roads
programmed for improvement with Revenue Sharing Funds include: Meadow Creek
Parkway (Rte 631); Rio Rd. (Rte. 631), Greenbrier Extended (Rte 866); Georgetown Rd.
(Rte. 656); Airport Rd. (Rte. 649); Old Ivy Rd. (Rte. 601); Old Lynchburg Rd. (Rte. 631);
Jarmans Gap Rd. (Rte. 691). No impact on the operating budget is expected. This project
is funded at 25% in FY 95-96 with matching funds to be provided by the State.
Landscaping Route 29. This project funds landscaping improvements along Rte. 29, which
has been disturbed by proposed VDOT improvements. Landscaping projects include
mulching, weeding, spraying and planting. This project will have no impact on the operating
budget and is funded at 16% in FY 95-96, with $10,000 in matching funds from North
Charlottesville businesses.
Libraries
Library MaintenancelReplacement Projects. Funds a variety of maintenance and replace-
ment projects at the regional library branches. Projects scheduled to be completed in FY
95/96 include scraping, painting, patching, and recarpeting at the Central Library, exterior
and interior painting at Central and Gordon Libraries, and replacing the HV AC system and
controls at the Scottsville and Crozet branches. This project is not expected to have an
impact on the operating budget. This project is funded at 24% in FY 95/96, with $18,000
contributed by the City.
$250,000
$250,000
$340,800
$500,000
$3,000
$40,000
Parks and Recreation
ADA Compliance at Parks. Funds the removal of architectural barriers and the addition of
paving, railing, ramps, signage and pay phones at various County parks, including Ivy
Creek, Chris Greene, Walnut Creek and Mint Springs. Annual costs of $500/year for
replacement signs and $1 ,200/year for Porta-John service are anticipated, plus an additional
$3,000/every three years for replacement much at Towe Park playground. This project is
funded at 50% in FY 95/96, with an additional $18,405 contributed by the City.
ADA Compliance on School PlaygroundsFunds the removal of architectural barriers and
the additional of signage, paved pathways and parking, replacement much and bordering
and handicapped-accessible playground equipment at various County schools, including
include Stone Robinson, Meriwether Lewis, Stony Point and Cale. Additional operating
costs are expected in the amount of$45,000/every three years for replacement mulch every
three years (nine playgrounds @ $5,000/each every three years.) This project is funded at
50% in FY 95/96.
Red Hill Elementary Recreation Improvements. Construction of outdoor recreation
facilities that will include 1 handicapped accessible playground unit and swing sets for all
ages. The project includes wood borders and carpet mulch, 4 aluminum basketball goals, 1
pair of portable soccer goals and grading and paving for 600' of accessible pathways.
Operating costs include the replacement of wood carpet mulch @ $5,000/every three years.
This project is funded at 100% in FY 95/96.
Greer Elementary Recreation Improvements. Construction of outdoor recreation facili-
ties that will include 2 handicapped accessible playground units and swing sets, the
installation of wood borders and carpet mulch, 2 aluminum basketball goals, portable soccer
goals, replacement benches and trash cans, and the grading and paving for 300' of accessible
pathways. Operating costs include the replacement of wood carpet mulch @ $5,000/every
three years. This project is funded at 100% in FY 95/96.
Rivanna Greenway Access and Path. Purchase of 4 acres to be used in conjunction with
land proffers to develop the County's initial phase ofRivanna Greenway. This project also
will improve and increase parking areas and develop 2,400' of accessible paved pathways,
accessible bank fishing areas and benches, and a reservoir boat access. In FY 95/96, $918
in additional operating costs will be incurred for trash pickup at the site. This project is
funded at 25% in FY 95-96.
Scottsville Community Center Outdoor Improvements. Construction of a picnic shelter,
outdoor basketball courts access to restrooms, and accessible pathways as needed. In FY
97-98, two tennis courts also will be constructed. No impact on the operating budget is
expected in FY 95-96. This project is funded at 53% in FY 95-96.
Milton/Chris GreenIMint Springs Security. The installation of a chain link fence along
the Milton Park property line to prevent trespassing and illegal dumping. In FY 96-97, a
security fence and covered storage area also will be installed at Chris Greene and Mint
Springs. This project could result in reduced operating costs of $750-$1,000 in FY 95-96
as a result of fewer man hours needed for cleanup of illegally dumped materials. This project
is funded 33% in FY 95-96.
$80,278
$89,375
$67,000
$77,000
$25,000
$63,525
$10,000
Crozet Park Improvements. Provides $150,000 over a two year period for the clearing of
land for parking, and the construction of two tennis courts and a replacement swimming
pool. No impact on the operating budget is anticipated. This project is funded at 33% in
FY 95-96.
Parks & Recreation MaintenancelReplacement Projects. Funds a variety of maintenance
and replacement projects at Count parks. FY 95-96 projects include parking lot and access
road resurfacing for Greenwood and Scottsville Community Centers, ICNA and Totier
Creek Park. Additionally, the project includes the installation of a lake well and kiddie
fountain and plumbing improvements at Chris Greene Lake. A minimal reduction in
operating costs is expected due to lower maintenance costs. This project is funded at 45%
in FY 95-96, with an additional $6,500 one-time contribution from the City.
Warren Ferry. The purchase of 5 acres of land at Warren Ferry River Access site for the
parking area, the installation of fencing and an access gate, as well as minor grading of the
parking area. This project is expected to cost $4,000/year in off-duty police security to
monitor the access gate. (parks and Recreation currently funds half the cost of security and
the County Executive has recommend funding for an additional $2,000.) This project is
funded at 100% in FY 95/96.
Education (General Government)
PVCC Social Science Building. The construction of a social science building to provide
specialized classrooms and laboratories needed for courses taught within the areas of
humanities and the social sciences; a theater for artistic functions including music, drama,
theater and speech; and adequate office space for faculty members. Funding from localities
will be used for site development. This project is not expected to impact the operating budget
and is funded at 100% in FY 95-96.
Utilities Improvements
County Master Drainage Plan. The original CIP request proposed a study to identify and
correct drainage problems from existing and future development. The scope of this project
has been expanded to include a master drainage plan for the County in anticipation of new
Virginia State and Federal EPA stormwater management regulations. No impact on the
operating budget is anticipated. This project is funded at 20% in FY 95-96.
Stormwater Projects. This project will provide funds for the expeditious response and
provision of corrective measures to meet the increased incidence of flooding, erosion, and
other drainage related problems in the County. No impact on the operating budget is
anticipated. This project is funded at 20% in FY 95-96.
$50,000
$77,000
$20,000
$62,335
$60,000
$50,000
Education (School Division
New High School. This project will build a new high school for initial enrollment of 1,000 $2,400,000
students and plan for future expansion for 500 additional students. Core areas will be
designed to serve a capacity of 1,500. The building will incorporate design concepts that
will support maximum flexibility and state-of-the-art technology support. This project is
expected to add the following recwring costs to the operating budget: $87,000 beginning
in FY98, $1,279,050 beginning in FY99 and $19,500 beginning in FY2000. This project
is funded at 10% in FY 95-96.
W AHS Building Renovations. This project adds a classroom of 10,665 square feet, and $943,650
includes minor and major renovations to current interior space, major parking/bus/driveway
improvements, baseball field upgrades, an auxiliary gym and two lighted tennis courts.
These renovations will not change the capacity of the school, which currently is 1,044. This
project is expected to add $19,500 in recurring costs to the operating budget beginning in
FY97, and $7,200 in recurring costs beginning in FY2000. This project is funded at 33%
in FY 95-96.
AHS Phase II, III Renovations. Phase II renovations include kitchen renovation and $1,007,000
improvements, cafeteria improvements (including service area configuration), improve-
ments to the auditorium (including a new stage door, seat repair and painting), new restrooms
for the cafeteria and auditorium, restoration of the first floor and main hallway restrooms,
and the removal of the lobby kiosk and renovation of the entire lobby area (to include a
window over-looking the lobby for security and monitoring purposes.) Phase III includes
renovation of the old girls/boys locker rooms, and miscellaneous/contingency fees. No
significant impact on the operating budget is anticipated. This project is funded at 55% in
FY 95-96.
W oodbrook Renovations! Additions. These renovations/additions include four kindergar- $200,000
ten classrooms, four first grade classrooms, two resource rooms, two work rooms, additions
to the media center and administrative areas, and staff lound/dining and guidance/test-
ing/conference areas. (16,718 square feet) A parent drop-off area, separate from the buses
also is included, as are improvements to door hardware, signage and restrooms to meet ADA
requirements and asbestos removal. The physical capacity will be increased from 220 to
440 students. This project is expected to add $43,300 in recurring operating costs, beginning
in FY 98. This project is funded at 10% in FY 95-96.
Cale Additions. These additions include three specialty classrooms and three special needs $78,000
classrooms (for a total of 6,800 square feet), that would increase the physical capacity from
396 to 528 students. This project is expected to add $14,400 in recurring operating costs,
beginning in FY 98. This project is funded at 10% in FY 95-96.
Stony Point Renovations/ Additions. These renovations/additions include renovations to $70,000
the kitchen, and the addition of five regular and one special education classrooms (9,500
square feet) and auxiliary spaces such as a work room, storage and a testing area. This
project is expected to add $17,500 in recwring operating costs, beginning in FY 98. This
project is funded at 6% in FY 95-96.
Brownsville Renovations/ Addition. These renovations/additions include two kindergar- $100,000
ten classrooms, one special education classroom, two resource rooms, two work rooms,
additions to the media center and administrative areas, and staff lounge/dining and guid-
ance/testing/conference areas. (9,470 square feet) A parent drop-off area, separate from the
buses, also is included, as are improvements to door hardware, signage and restrooms to
meet ADA requirements, asbestos removal, and air conditioning of the cafeteria. The
physical capacity will be increased from 242 to 330. This project is expected to add $23,000
in recurring costs to the operating budget, beginning in FY 98. This project is funded at 8%
in FY 95-96.
Crozet Addition. These additions include one kindergarten classroom, one fIrst grade $80,000
classroom, three general classrooms, one resource room, and one work room (for a total of
7,200 square feet). The physical capacity will be increased from 286 to 396 students. This
project is expected to add $20,100 in recurring costs to the operating budget, beginning in
FY 98. This project is funded at 10% in FY 95-96.
Murray High Renovations. These renovations include general remodeling, expansion of $95,000
the Science classroom, a new heating/cooling system, the replacement of all windows
including those in the resource center, and site work. A reduction in recurrent utility costs
can be expected with the installation of a new HV AC system. This project is funded at 10%
in FY 95-96.
Maintenance and Replacement. This project funds a variety of maintenance and $1,385,300
replacement projects at various schools. A slight reduction in utility costs is anticipated,
beginning in FY97 as projects that replace old and defective heat pumps, heating units and
boilers are completed. This project is funded at 20% in FY 95-96.
Burley Roof Replacement. This project will replace the remainder of roof not replaced in $140,000
1993. No impact on the operating budget is anticipated. This project is funded at 100% in
FY 95-96.
ADA Structural Changes/ Miscellaneous Schools. This project will make "structural" $186,485
changes to various schools to allow for accessibility and full compliance with ADA
requirements. These structural changes include the installation/modifIcation of elevators,
restrooms, drinking fountains, signage, door hardware, signaling devices, etc. No impact
on the operating budget is anticipated. This project is funded at 23% in FY 95-96.
Instructional Technology for the School Division. This project funds instructional $1,080,000
technology in the form of new networks; the expansion and completion of existing networks;
computers for classrooms, computer labs and libraries; software and CD-ROM drives;
multimedia devices; and support equipment and supplies. This project is expected to add
recurring maintenance, personnel/support and training costs to the operating budget. In
FY96, these operating costs are estimated to be $23,940 for maintenance, $15,960 in
personnel/support costs, and $7,980 in training costs. This project is funded at 30% in FY
95-96.
Administrative Technology for the School Division. This project funds administrative $70,000
technology in the form of new networks; and the expansion and upgrade of existing
networks. This project is expected to add recurring maintenance, personnel/support and
training costs to the operating budget. In FY96, these operating costs are estimated to be
$1,700 for maintenance, $1,000 in personnel/support costs, and $1,000 in training costs.
This project is funded at 20% in FY 95-96.
Security Systems - All Schools. This project will install security systems in various
elementary schools in FY 1995, targeting specific areas such as computer, band, and science
rooms, as well as athletic equipment storage facilities. This project is funded at 100% in FY
95-96.
$44,900
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsvine
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
t:.Z:z~-
9~-. (J,It,), 0:J.. r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296·5800
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Walter F. Perkins
White HajJ
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Mil!er
MEMORANDUM
Board of Supervisors
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC g..J C----
April 7, 1995
Reading List for April 12, 1995
January 4, 1995 - Mrs. Humphris
EWC:mms
*
Printed on recycled paper