The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995-05-03 FIN A L 9:00 A.M. May 3, 1995 Room 7, County Office Building 1) Call to Order. 2) Pledge of Allegiance. 3) Moment of Silence. 4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. 5) Consent Agenda (on next sheet). 6) Transportation Matters: a) Charlottesville Transit Service (CTS) - changes to Whitewood Road/Albert Court bus stop on Route 9. b) Discussion: Truck Traffic Restriction on Route 231/22. c) Other Transportation Matters. 7) Presentation by Larry Land, Intergovernmental Relations Coordinator - Virginia Association of Counties. 8) 10:00 A.M. - Public Hearing on a request to abandon a public road not in the State Highway System beginning at the common intersection of State Route 664 and the southernmost common boundary on State Route 664 of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29A, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, thence in a northeasterly direction along the common boundary of said Tax Map 19, Parcel 29A, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, to the southernmost point of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, thence continuing in a northeasterly direction on the common boundary of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, to a point where Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, and Tax Map 20, Parcel 6A, all intersect. Thence in a northwesterly direction along the common boundary line of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, and Tax Map 20, Parcel 6A, to Tax Map 19, Parcel 32C, where said road ends. 9) 10:10 A.M. - Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 9, Fire Protection, Article III, FIREWORKS, of the Code of Albemarle in Section 9-19, sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain locations. This amendment will set forth that it is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, organization or group to sell, offer for sale, store, display, manufacture, possess or discharge any fireworks within 100 feet of any gasoline pump, propane distribution tank, or other inflammable liquid distribution pump or apparatus, except in a fully enclosed building where fireworks are permitted for such sale or use. A description of a "fully enclosed building" is also provided. 10) 10:30 A.M. - CPA-95-1. Mill Creek. Public Hearing on a request to change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for 80.34 ac from Industrial Service to Low Density Residential for property immediately N of Southern Parkway on N sd of Mill Creek residential development & S of I-64. TM76M1,Ps10&10B. Scottsville Dist. 11) Presentation on Welfare Reform. 12) Appropriation Request: a) Community Services Activity Fund, $1,147,155 (Form #940061). 13) Discussion: New High School. 14) Executive Session: Legal and Personnel Matters. 15) Certify Executive Session. 16) Appointments. 17) Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. 18) Adjourn. CONSENT AGENDA FOR APPROVAL: 5.1 Appropriation Requests: a) Drug Free Schools and Communities Act Grant, $43,663 (Form #940057) . b) Automart USA Frontage Road Performance Bonds, $16,970 (Form #940058) . c) Health Insurance Fund, $8500 (Form #940059) . d) Emergency Operations Center, $18,305 (Form #940060). e) Housing Counselor, $17,500. 5.2 Proclamation proclaiming May 13, 1995 as Letter Carrier Food Drive Day. FOR INFORMATION: 5.3 Copy of Planning Commission minutes for April 4, April 11 and April 18, 1995. 5.4 Copy of minutes of the Board of Directors of the Albemarle County Service Authority for March 26, 1995. 5.5 Copy of minutes of the Board of Directors of the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority for March 27, 1995. 5.6 Copy of Acme Design Technology, Co., 1995 Strategic Plan (on file in Clerk's office). 5.7 March 1995 Financial Report. 5.8 1994-95 Work Plan for the County Development Departments. 5.9 Copy of letter dated April 25, 1995, from A. G. Tucker, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, to Ralph L. Feil, re: Route 250 West - Belair Entrance Task Force. 5.10 1994 Annual Report for Jefferson Area Board for Aging. 5.11 Letter dated April 25, 1995, from R. H. Connock, Jr., District Construction Engineer, Department of Transportation, regarding Citizen Information Meetings on the U. S. Route 29 Corridor Development Study. 5.12 Letter dated May 1, 1995, from J. H. Shifflett, Jr., Maintenance Operations Manager, Department of Transportation, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, providing notice that Route 691 between Route 636 and Route 635 will be closed to through traffic from Monday, May 8, through Friday, May 12, 1995. 5.13 Letter dated May 1, 1995, from A. G. Tucker, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, providing the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently under construction in Albemarle County. TEN TAT I V E 9:00 A.M. May 3, 1994 Room 7, County Office Building 1) Call to Order. 2) Pledge of Allegiance. 3) Moment of Silence. 4) Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC. 5) Consent Agenda (on next sheet) . 6) Transportation Matters: a) Charlottesville Transit Service (CTS) - changes to Whitewood Road/Albert Court bus stop on Route 9. b) Discussion: Truck Traffic Restriction on Route 231/22. c) Other Transportation Matters. 7) Presentation by Larry Land, Intergovernmental Relations Coordinator - Virginia Association of Counties. 8) 10:00 A.M. - Public Hearing on a request to abandon a public road not in the State Highway System beginning at the common intersection of State Route 664 and the southernmost common boundary on State Route 664 of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29A, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, thence in a northeasterly direction along the common boundary of said Tax Map 19, Parcel 29A, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, to the southernmost point of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, thence continuing in a northeasterly direction on the common boundary of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, to a point where Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, and Tax Map 20, Parcel 6A, all intersect. Thence in a northwesterly direction along the common boundary line of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, and Tax Map 20, Parcel 6A, to Tax Map 19, Parcel 32C, where said road ends. 9) 10:10 A.M. - Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 9, Fire Protection, Article III, FIREWORKS, of the Code of Albemarle in Section 9-19, sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain locations. This amendment will set forth that it is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, organization or group to sell, offer for sale, store, display, manufacture, possess or discharge any fireworks within 100 feet of any gasoline pump, propane distribution tank, or other inflammable liquid distribution pump or apparatus, except in a fully enclosed building where fireworks are permitted for such sale or use. A description of a "fully enclosed building" is also provided. 10) 10:30 A.M. - CPA-95-1. Mill Creek. Public Hearing on a request to change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for 80.34 ac from Industrial Service to Low Density Residential for property immediately N of Southern Parkway on N sd of Mill Creek residential development & S of I-64. TM76M1,Ps10&10B. Scottsville Dist. 11) Presentation on Welfare Reform. 12) Appropriation Request: a) Community Services Activity Fund, $1,147,155 (Form #940061). 13) Discussion: New High School. 14) Executive Session: Legal Matters. 15) Certify Executive Session. 16) Appointments. 17) Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. 18) Adjourn. CONSENT AGENDA FOR APPROVAL: 5.1 Appropriation Requests: a) Drug Free Schools and Communities Act Grant, $43,663 (Form #940057) . b) Automart USA Frontage Road Performance Bonds, $16,970 (Form #940058) . c) Health Insurance Fund, $8500 (Form #940059) . d) Emergency Operations Center, $18,305 (Form #940060). e) Housing Counselor, $17,500. 5.2 proclamation proclaiming May 13, 1995 as Letter Carrier Food Drive Day. FOR INFORMATION: 5.3 Copy of Planning Commission minutes for April 4, April 11 and April 18, 1995. 5.4 Copy of minutes of the Board of Directors of the Albemarle County Service Authority for March 26, 1995. 5.5 Copy of minutes of the Board of Directors of the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority for March 27, 1995. 5.6 Copy of Acme Design Technology, Co., 1995 Strategic Plan (on file in Clerk's office). 5.7 March 1995 Financial Report. 5.8 1994-95 Work Plan for the County Development Departments. 5.9 Copy of letter dated April 25, 1995, from A. G. Tucker, Resident Engineer, Department of Transportation, to Ralph L. Feil, re: Route 250 West - Belair Entrance Task Force. David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Rivanna Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Walter F. Perkins White Hall Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller MEMORANDUM TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk fþ.)C- DATE: May 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Board Actions of May 3, 1995 At the Board of Supervisors' meeting held on May 3, 1995, the following actions were taken: Agenda Item No.1. The meeting was called to order at 9:02 a.m., with Mr. Martin arriving at 9:05 a.m. Agenda Item 5.1 a. Appropriation: Drug Free Schools and Communities Act Grant, $43,663, (Form #940057). APPROVED. Form sent to Melvin Breeden. Agenda Item 5.1 b. Appropriation: Automart USA Frontage Road Performance Bonds, $16,970 (Form #940058). APPROVED. Form sent to Melvin Breeden. Agenda Item 5.1 c. Appropriation: Health Insurance Fund, $8500 (Form #940059). APPROVED. Form sent to Melvin Breeden, Item 5.1 d. Appropriation: Emergency Operations Center, $18,305 (Form #940060). APPROVED. Form sent to Melvin Breeden. Item 5.1 e. Appropriation: Housing Counselor, $17,500. APPROVED. The amount of $17,500 which was approved is to be included in the Annual Appropriation Ordinance for 1995-96. The Board requested that a letter of thanks be sent to Jefferson National Bank for the challenge grant of $5000 as per letter of W. A. Pace, Jr., Vice Chairman, dated April 28, 1995. Item. 5.2 Proclamation proclaiming May 13, 1995, as Letter Carrier Food Drive Day. Mr. Perkins read the proclamation and then presented same to Mr. James Smith, President of the Letter Carriers Local. Mr. Perkins also read into the record a proclamation for "Give Air-A-Brake Day". Hannah Twaddell and Juandiego Wade were present. * Printed on recycled paper Memo To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. Date: May 8, 1995 Page 2 Agenda Item No. 6a. Transportation Matters: Charlottesville Transit Service (CTS) - changes to Whitewood Road/Albert Court bus stop on Route 9. The Board requested that Albert Court be added back to Route 9 to see if the City can make the schedule work. A report should be made to the Board as soon as that is known. Vote 6/0. Agenda Item No. 6b. Discussion: Truck Traffic Restriction on Route 231/22. The Board requested additional information from the Highway Department at the June 7 Board meeting as to the number of through trucks, as opposed to just the number of trucks. Angela Tucker mentioned several things which her office is investigating. Mr. John Moore handed in the attached sheet noting trucks that had been seen on Route 231. Vote 6/0. Mr. Martin did note his intent to move, at some time in the future, that the Board proceed with necessary measures to restrict through truck traffic on these routes. Agenda Item No. 6c. Other Transportation Matters. Mr. Daniel Day was present to speak about the condition of a bridge on Route 633 just off of Route 29 South. He also mentioned a very narrow road in South Garden and a "SO curve on that road. He then complained about numerous rock outcroppings along these narrow roads which school buses strike on occasion. Move by Bowerman, seconded by Marshall to adopt the attached resolution re: the Route 29 North interchanges, and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Motion passed 4/2. This part of the minutes is complete, if you are interested in the whole conversation. Agenda Item No.7. Larry Land, Intergovernmental Relations Coordinator - Virginia Association of Counties. Mr. Land was basically present as an observer. He asked the Board to submit their legislative requests to VACO at an early date. Agenda Item No.8. Public Hearing on a request to abandon a public road not in the State Highway System beginning at the common intersection of State Route 664 and the southernmost common boundary on State Route 664 of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29A, etc. ADOPTED the attached resolution. Vote 6/0. Agenda Item No.9. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 9, Fire Protection, Article III, FIREWORKS, of the Code of Albemarle in Section 9-19, sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain locations. ADOPTED as advertised. Vote 6/0. Copy attached. Agenda Item No. 10. CPA-95-1. Mill Creek. Public Hearing on a request to change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for 80.34 ac from Industrial Service to Low Density Residential for property immediately N of Southern Parkway on N sd of Mill Creek residential development & S of 1-64. TM76M1,Ps10&10B. Scottsville Dist. ADOPTED as recommended by the Planning Commission, which is to change the designation of the above property on the land use map for Neighborhood 4 in the Comprehensive Plan. Vote 6/0. Agenda Item No. 11. Presentation on Welfare Reform. Requested the staff to look at an amendment to state law to increase the value of a vehicle as applied under ADC regulations. Agenda Item No. 12. Appropriation Request: Community Services Activity Fund, $1,147,155 (Form #940061). APPROVED. Appropriation form sent to Melvin Breeden. Agenda Item No. 13. Discussion: New High School. AUTHORIZED the Chairman to sign the appropriate documents allowing the Board to execute the option on the 110 acres at a purchase price of $1.9 million. Vote 6/0. Memo To: Robert W. Tucker, Jr. Date: May 8, 1995 Page 3 Agenda Item No. 16. Appointments. Appointed the following people to the Historic Preservation Committee. Vote 6/0. W. James Eddins 2051 Polo Grounds Road, Charlottesville, VA 22901 Jeffrey L. Hantman 209 Surrey Road, Charlottesville, VA 22901 Ralph Dammann 2958 Barrsden Farm, Charlottesville, VA 22901 Sara Lee Barnes Cloverfields, Route 1, Box 1295, Keswick, VA 22947 Dr. C. Jared Loewenstein Route 4, Box 142, Charlottesville, VA 22901-9163 Mary Ann J. Elder P. o. Box 59, Ivy, VA. 22945 Mrs. Bessie B. Carter 852 Redlands Farm Road, Charlottesville, VA 22902 Cynthia Marie Conte Route 21, Box 103, Charlottesville, VA 22902 Robert L. Self Route 1, Box 114, Wingina, VA 24599 HISTORIC PRESERVATION/ARCHAEOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY, UVA OWNER, PRESERVATION-RELATED BUSINESS CITIZENS FOR ALBEMARLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION/ARCHAEOLOGY OWNER HISTORIC PROPERTIES OWNER, VIRGINIA OR NATIONAL REGISTER PROPERTY MEMBER ALBEMARLE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ARCHITECTURAL CONSERVATOR MONTICELLO APPOINTED the following people to the Mountain Land Protection Committee. Vote 6/0. Joseph T. Henley, Jr. Sherry Buttrick Page O'Neill Gilliam David A. Tice Will Ri eley Dr. G. Carleton Ray Tim Michel Peter G. Hallock Mark Lorenzoni Sandy Rives Rt. 2, Box, 139, Crozet, VA 22932 P. o. Box 20, Charlottesville, VA 22902 Route 5, Box 211A, Charlottesville, VA 22901 601 Brighton Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22901 109 2nd Street, S.E., Charlottesville, VA 22902 Rt. 2, Box 23-C, Charlottesville, VA 22901 1520 West Pines Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22901 P. o. Box 138, Keswick, VA 22947 Route 5, Box 340, Charlottesville, VA 22901 Rt. 1, Box 1136, Keswick, VA 22947, Ex-Officio OWNER OF MOUNTAIN PROPERTY VIRGINIA OUTDOORS FOUNDATION OWNER OF MOUNTAINTOP PROPERTY PROFESSIONAL FORESTER/BIOLOGIST LANDSCAPE PLANNER ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES MEMBER, ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD OWNER OF MOUNTAIN LAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SHENANDOAH NATIONAL PARK Agenda Item No. 17. Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD. Move by Bowerman, seconded by Humphris, to advertise for a public hearing on June 14, 1995, to consider the repeal of the open space use category for purposes of land use taxation. Vote 6/0. I need the ordinance amendment by May 19, in order to get the advertisement to the Daily Progress on time. Mr. Martin announced that he will run for re-election this Fall. Mrs. Humphris asked about the proposed connector between Mill Creek and the Lake Reynovia property. She thought the Board was to approve something further on this request. Mr. Davis said the applicant has drawn an agreement which he wants the Homeowners' Association to approve prior to bringing the proffer back to this Board. It is the intent to turn over the responsibility for the maintenance of the emergency access to the homeowners' association, and he wants it approved before obligating himself. Agenda Item No. 18. Adjourn. At 2:38 P.M., the meeting was over. Attachments (9) cc: Richard E. Huff, II Roxanne White V. Wayne Cilimberg Larry W. Davis File APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 94/95 NUMBER 940057 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES NO x FUND GRANT PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: FUNDING FOR DRUG FREE SCHOOLS GRANT. EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1310761101312500 PROF. SVCS.-INSTRUCTIONAL $1,000.00 1310761101312700 PROF. SVCS.-CONSULTANTS 36,260.00 1310761101601300 EDUC/RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES 500.00 1310761101580000 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 2,000.00 1310761311550400 TRAVEL-EDUCATION 1,000.00 1310761311580000 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 500.00 1310761311580500 STAFF DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES 2,403.00 TOTAL $43,663.00 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 2310724000240233 DRUG FREE SCHOOLS GRANT $43,663.00 TOTAL $43,663.00 ************************************************************************ REQUESTING COST CENTER: EDUCATION APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ¿t'.- .2. ¿) -"T':7" 5-!?- rs- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 94/95 NUMBER 940058 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES NO x FUND GENERAL PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: USE OF DEVELOPER'S BOND TO COMPLETE ROAD AND SOIL EROSION AT AUTO MART. EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1100041000950023 AUTOMART ROAD/SOIL EROSION $16,970.00 TOTAL $16,970.00 2100014000140120 2100014000140121 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ STREET BOND FORFEITURES SOIL EROSION FORFEITURES $14,000.00 2,970.00 TOTAL $16,970.00 ************************************************************************ REQUESTING COST CENTER: ENGINEERING APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 7'-ZS--?s- .:;--?- ~ S- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 94/95 NUMBER 940059 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x X ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES NO X FUND GENERAL PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM HEALTH INSURANCE FUND TO SCHOOL FUND TO COVER COST OF HEALTH INSURANCE CONSULTANTS. EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1242062140312700 HEALTH CONSULTANTS $8,500.00 1102093010930002 TRANSFER TO SCHOOL FUND-PERSONNEL 8,500.00 TOTAL $17,000.00 2200051000512013 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ TRANSFER FROM HEALTH FUND $8,500.00 2102018000189914 TRIGON REFUND 8,500.00 TOTAL $17,000.00 ************************************************************************ REQUESTING COST CENTER: HUMAN RESOURCES APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 0/ -z./ ~:r5 .5--,j"- ?~-' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FISCAL YEAR TYPE OF APPROPRIATION APPROPRIATION REQUEST 94/95 NUMBER 940060 ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? FUND YES NO x EMERGENCY OPR. CENTER PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: FUNDING OF ONE-TIME PURCHASES FROM FUND BALANCE. EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1410031040312710 1410031040600100 1410031040601100 1410031040800200 1410031040800301 1410031040800700 1410031040800710 ANNUAL SOFTWARE COST OFFICE SUPPLIES/DISPATCH CARDS UNIFORMS AND APPAREL FURNITURE AND FIXTURES COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT-REPLACEMENT DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT DATA PROCESSING SOFTWARE $500.00 3,075.00 3,000.00 1,300.00 830.00 8,100.00 1,500.00 TOTAL $18,305.00 2410051000510100 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ EOC FUND BALANCE $18,305.00 TOTAL $18,305.00 REQUESTING COST CENTER: ************************************************************************ APPROVALS: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER SIGNATURE DATE ~~A~ é¿!d 4/tL¿ - 9- -.:2 S ~ 7'6'" .5J--?-7j- . ðC5'~5-3_?~~ Partial Listing of Truck Companies Observed on Rts. 231/22 Martin Bower* Overnight Express* Estes* Old Dominion (3) Joyce Moving and Storage Mills Transfer (2) English Young Burlington Beauty Rest Maclane* Richfood J.B. Hunt* Allied Van Lines Roadway Schuler Express (3) (3) - Number of trucks observed travelling together * - Regular, numerous sightings . RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the construction of the Meadow Creek Parkway is critical to solving the transportation needs of Albemarle County, the City of Charlottesville, and Central Virginia; and WHEREAS, Albemarle County has many other documented road needs and the designation of the Meadow Creek Parkway for Primary Road funding would free Secondary Road funding for other essential road priorities; and WHEREAS, the Meadow Creek Parkway is the County's highest priority road need and withdrawal of support for grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North would recognizs that the Commonwealth has limited funds available and that these limited funds should be spent on the projects with the greatest immediate benefit to this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors gives its full support to designing a Meadow Creek Parkway which is both cost-effective and realistic and asks that the Commonwealth Transporta- tion Board designate the Meadow Creek Parkway as a Primary Highway and place it in the current Six- Year Primary Road plan for funding; and FURTHER RESOLVED that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors hereby withdraws its previous support for Grade-Separated Interchanges on Route 29 at Hydraulic, Greenbrier and Rio Roads. ***** I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on May 3, 1995. C~160f~(~ . RES 0 L UTI 0 N BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does hereby abandon per Virginia Code Sections 33.1-156, eta I, a public road not in the State Highway System beginning at the common intersection of State Route 664 and the southernmost common boundary on State Route 664 of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29A, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, thence in a northeasterly direction along the common boundary of said Tax Map 19, Parcel 29A, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, to the southernmost point of Tax Map 19, Parcel 290, thence continuing in a north- easterly direction on the common boundary of Tax Map 19, Parcel 290, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, to a point where Tax Map 19, Parcel 290, Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, and Tax Map 20, Parcel 6A, all intersect. Thence in a northwesterly direction along the common boundary line of Tax Map 19, Parcel 290, and Tax Map 20, Parcel 6A, to Tax Map 19, Parcel 32C, where said road ends. * * * * * I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on May 3, 1995. ..... ORDINANCE NO. 95-9(1) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 9, FIRE PROTECTION, ARTICLE III, FIREWORKS, OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of Albe- marle County, Virginia, that Chapter 9, Fire Protection, Article III, Fireworks, is hereby amended and reordained by amending Section 9-19, Sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain locations, as follows: Sec. 9-19. Sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain loca- tions. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, organization or group to sell, offer for sale, store, display, manufacture, possess or discharge any fireworks within one hundred (100) feet of any gasoline pump, propane distribution tank, or other inflammable liquid distribution pump or apparatus, except in a fully enclosed building where fireworks are permitted for such sale or use. Fully enclosed building shall not be construed to include any outdoor stands or other similar structures that have been set up to sell, offer for sale, store or display any fireworks. * * * * * I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on May 3, 1995. ct~ of-L{:~isors - APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 94/95 NUMBER 940061 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES NO x FUND COMMUNITY SERVICES ACT FUN PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: FUNDING AND APPROPRIATIONS FOR FY 94/95 ACTIVITY. EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1155153120300205 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $32,000.00 1155153120571211 RESID. PUBLIC 160,645.00 1155153120571212 RESID. PRIVATE 535,644.00 1155153120571213 NON-RESID. PUBLIC 30,644.00 1155153120571214 NON-RESID. PRIVATE 150,645.00 1155153120571215 RESID. PUBLIC NON-MANDATED 20,644.00 1155153120571216 RESID. PRIVATE NON-MANDATED 100,645.00 1155153120571217 NON-RESID. PUBLIC NON-MANDATED 50,644.00 1155153120571218 NON-RESID. PRIVATE NON-MANDATED 65,644.00 TOTAL $1,147,155.00 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 2155116000160521 LOCAL-ALBEMARLE $417,220.00 2155116000160522 LOCAL-EDUCATION 99,000.00 2155124000240109 STATE POOL FUNDS 630,935.00 TOTAL $1,147,155.00 ************************************************************************ REQUESTING COST CENTER: SOCIAL SERVICES APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 7<'-?.£r-/~ S-? -f!j BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - David P. Bowerman Charlottesvi!le COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins While Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller MEMO TO: Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC WC DATE: May 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Appropriations Approved on May 3, 1995 At the Board's meeting on May 3, 1995, the following appropriations were approved: Appropriation Form #940057 for funding of Drug Free Schools Grant for 1994-95 (Grant Fund) in the amount of $43,663.00. Appropriation Form #940058 for use of developer's bond to complete road and soil erosion at Automart (General Fund) in the amount of $16,970.00. Appropriation Form #940059 for transfer of funds from health insurance to School Fund to cover cost of health insurance consultants (General Fund) in the amount of $17,000. Appropriation Form #940060 for funding of one-time purchases from Fund Balance (Emergency Operations Center) in the amount of $18,305.00. Appropriation Form #940061 for funding and appropriations for FY 1994-95 (Community Services Fund) in the amount of $1,147,155.00. The Board also approved an appropriation in the amount of $l7,500 for a housing counselor position as per the attached executive summary. It will be made a part of the Annual Appropriation Ordinance for 1995-96 which will be adopted some time in June. The signed appropriation forms are attached. If possible, drop the appropri- ation forms in I:\GENERAL\SHARE\ESTELLE. If not, give me a call and I will send down a formatted disk. EWC: len Attachments (6) cc: Roxanne White Carole A. Hastings Karen Morris Jo Higgins Wayne Campagna File * Printed on recycled paper .~ i David P. Bowerman o,arlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 2965843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsvil1e Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller MEMO TO: Melvin A. Breeden, Director of Finance FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC flue- DATE: May 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Appropriations Approved on May 3, 1995 At the Board's meeting on May 3, 1995, the following appropriations were approved: Appropriation Form #940057 for funding of Drug Free Schools Grant for 1994-95 (Grant Fund) in the amount of $43,663.00. Appropriation Form #940058 for use of developer's bond to complete road and soil erosion at Automart (General Fund) in the amount of $16,970.00. Appropriation Form #940059 for transfer of funds from health insurance to School Fund to cover cost of health insurance consultants (General Fund) in the amount of $17,000. Appropriation Form #940060 for funding of one-time purchases from Fund Balance (Emergency Operations Center) in the amount of $18,305.00. Appropriation Form #940061 for funding and appropriations for FY 1994-95 (Community Services Fund) in the amount of $1,147,155.00. The Board also approved an appropriation in the amount of $17,500 for a housing counselor position as per the attached executive summary. It will be made a part of the Annual Appropriation Ordinance for 1995-96 which will be adopted some time in June. The signed appropriation forms are attached. If possible, drop the appropri- ation forms in I:\GENERAL\SHARE\ESTELLE. If not, give me a call and I will send down a formatted disk. EWC: len Attachments (6) cc: Roxanne White Carole A. Hastings Karen Morris Jo Higgins Wayne Campagna File * Printed on recycled paper ALBEMARLE COUN'IY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Memorandum '7;J-~ I , (¡ì) fë! n -_. , "'1 '(._,_ W f.' . I" I , FROM: April 6, 1995 Robert W. ~r, Jr., County Executive Kevin cast~ Division Superintendent Request for Appropriation ¡"I~) :",>. '''~'_._., -'----.~~~ DATE: TO: RE: At its meeting on April 3, 1995 the School Board approved the appropriation of the Drug Free Schools and Communities Act Grant in the amount of $43,663.00. Albemarle County has participated in the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act for the past nine years. The purpose of the grant has been to establish, enhance and increase programs of illicit alcohol and other drug use education and prevention in order to achieve drug-free schools and communities. This grant has enabled us to pursue the following programs: The DARE Program, prevention· counseling (in coordination with Region Ten Community Services Board), Peer Mediation Programs, staff development programs, and activities for our youth such as PULSAR, YADAPP, and Youth Leadership Conferences. It is requested that the Board of Supervisors amend the appropriation ordinance to receive and disburse these funds as follows: Revenue: 2-3107-24000-240233 Drug Free Schools Grant $43,663.00 Expenditure: 1-3107-61101-312500 1-3107-61101-312700 1-3107-61101-601300 1-3107-61101-580000 1-3107-61311-550400 1-3107-61311-580000 1-3107-61311-580500 Prof. Svcs Instructional Prof. Svcs Consultants Ed/Recreational Supplies Miscellaneous Supplies Travel-Education Miscellaneous Supplies Staff Development Expenses $1,000.00 $36,260.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $500.00 $2,403.00 /smm xc: Jackson Zimmermann Melvin Breeden Ed Koonce Ella Carey I ì COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY f/-'¿?-J?- ?~ ACTION: ITEM NUMBER: ?,§c:?ft?;:? -5/ INFORMATION: AGENDA TITLE: Drug Free Schools and Communities Act Grant Appropriation AGENDA DATE: May 3,1995 SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: Request approval of appropriation #940057 of the Drug Free Schools and Communities Act Grant in the amoWlt of $43,663.00 CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: STAFF CONTACTlS): Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, & Ms. White REVIEWED BY: ATTACHMENTS: BACKGROUND: At its meeting on April 3, 1995, the School Board approved the appropriation of the Drug Free Schools and Communities Act Grant in the amoWlt of $43,663.00. DISCUSSION: Albemarle COWlty has participated in the Drug Free Schools and Communities Act for the past nine years. The purpose of the grant has been to establish, enhance and increase programs of illicit alcohol and other drug use education and prevention in order to achieve drug-free schools and communities. This grant has enabled us to pursue the following programs: The DARE Program, prevention cOWlseling (in coordination with Region Ten Community Services Board), Peer Mediation Programs, staff development programs, and activities for our youth such as PULSAR, Y ADAPP, and Youth Leadership Conferences. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this appropriation #940057 in the amoWlt of$43,663. APP9457. WPD 95.066 If'JD .'"'; (~ 7 1995 i ~ APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 94/95 NUMBER 940057 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES NO x F~D GRANT PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: F~DING FOR DRUG FREE SCHOOLS GRANT. EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1310761101312500 PROF. SVCS.-INSTRUCTIONAL $1,000.00 1310761101312700 PROF. SVCS.-CONSULTANTS 36,260.00 1310761101601300 EDUC/RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES 500.00 1310761101580000 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 2,000.00 1310761311550400 TRAVEL-EDUCATION 1,000.00 1310761311580000 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 500.00 1310761311580500 STAFF DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES 2,403.00 TOTAL $43,663.00 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMO~T ************************************************************************ 2310724000240233 DRUG FREE SCHOOLS GRANT $43,663.00 TOTAL $43,663.00 ************************************************************************ REQUESTING COST CENTER: EDUCATION APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~~2ð-?? S-f-rS- DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ,I COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE eí'l!Af ~ ,;~ I' . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY fZ-Ptf'-~~ AGENDA TITLE: Automart USA Frontage Road I Performance Bonds Appropriation AGENDA DATE: May 3,1995 ITEM NUMBER: 9.5:ð5ð3,Ç// ACTION: INFORMATION: SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: Request approval of Appropriation #940058 in the amount ofS16,970 for called Performance Bonds CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: ------ I STAFF CONTACnS): Ms. Hi . , Ms. White & Mr. Breeden REVIEWED BY: DISCUSSION: In October 1994, the County called a road/subdivision bond in the amount of $14,000 and an erosion control bond in the amount of $2,970 foc the Automart USA Frontage Road. These bonds were called since attempts to notï1y the developer of work required on the site were unsuccessful (i.e. certified letters came back either marked "refused" or "moved not forwardable"). This ftontage road was to be a State maintained road and has not been completed in accordance with the approved plan. These :funds will be used to complete the necessary items for road acceptance. The erosion control work will be done during the spring seeding season. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Appropriation #940058 in the amount of $16,970 to complete the road and erosion control work. AUTOMART.EXE 95.064 .,_._,-~....- ,"--,. '" f.·1 r; n ¡i 'c'··':.' ~r· tnt'll:", Dr>., ...~1 I ~ APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 94/95 NUMBER 940058 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES NO x FUND GENERAL PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: USE OF DEVELOPER'S BOND TO COMPLETE ROAD AND SOIL EROSION AT AUTO MART. EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1100041000950023 AUTOMART ROAD/SOIL EROSION $16,970.00 TOTAL $16,970.00 2100014000140120 2100014000140121 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ STREET BOND FORFEITURES SOIL EROSION FORFEITURES $14,000.00 2,970.00 TOTAL $16,970.00 ************************************************************************ REQUESTING COST CENTER: ENGINEERING APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE f;t;;ít:( 7' - :2-S--?S- ~-?- 7'S- DIRECTOR OF FINANCE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS '.. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY f-2-f,. 1'5 AGENDA TITLE: Health Insurance Appropriation AGENDA DATE: May 3,1995 ITEM NUMBER: ?5¿1~¿:f'::J.~ /¿ INFORMATION: ACTION: SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: Request approval of Appropriation #940059 to transfer fimds fi-om the health insurance fimd to the school fund to cover cost of health insurance consultants incurred in Department ofPersonnellHwnan Resources CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Yes (1) STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Breeden & Ms. White REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: The COWlty experienced an exceptionally good year for health insurance in FY 1993/94 resulting in a $710,236 surplus of fimds allocated versus actual expenses. This surplus resulted fi-om increased premiums to offset the previous year deficit and the anticipated increases for FY 1993/94 combined with a year that had relatively minor increases in actual medical expenses. DISCUSSION: Due to the increasing cost of health insurance, COWlty staff felt the need to obtain specialized assistance for future renewals of health policies. The area of health insurance has experienced some major changes such as HMO's, Gatekeeper's, Point of Service, etc. that require substantial time and knowledge to evaluate. Consultants were retained and currently are reviewing the proposals for FY 1995/96 insurance. The cost anticipated is $8,500 which can be funded fi-om a portion of the 1993/94 refimd. The amoWlt of$17 ,000 shown on the attached appropriation form reflects two (2) revenue line-items and two (2) expenditure line-items to complete the transfer. The first revenue line-item is a transfer ($8,500) fi-om the Trigon refimd to the health fimd, the second ($8,500) fi-om the health fimd to the school fimd. The line-item expenditures show an expenditure of $8,500 fi-om the health fimd to the school fund and then the expenditure in the personnel budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of appropriation #940059. - "-'--'--'-'---~-_..,-_..-,.-,--- APP9459.WPD 95.067 n ,-', '-'J n- ¡ 1:1 ¡ {'_I ¡ t" ì I, I, t .~ . ::, : ','} ¡.:~ ;_ ~l./ ! < APR 2 1 Iæ> "'-,--" -.~- '~'-"_.'T". ,"",... ___ '. .-, "-., '~..-~'"..~...".-- .' \ APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 94/95 NUMBER 940059 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x X ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES NO x FUND GENERAL PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM HEALTH INSURANCE FUND TO SCHOOL FUND TO COVER COST OF HEALTH INSURANCE CONSULTANTS. EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1242062140312700 HEALTH CONSULTANTS $8,500.00 1102093010930002 TRANSFER TO SCHOOL FUND-PERSONNEL 8,500.00 TOTAL $17,000.00 2200051000512013 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ TRANSFER FROM HEALTH FUND $8,500.00 2102018000189914 TRIGON REFUND 8,500.00 TOTAL $17,000.00 ************************************************************************ REQUESTING COST CENTER: HUMAN RESOURCES APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ~~~/~ ¿L -~ 0/ -Z-/ ~7'5 ,:j--?- ?..5~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS i ., COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY j/-/rF-fP5" AGF.NnA TITI.F.: Appropriation for the Emergency Operations Center AGF.NnA DA TF.: May 3, 1995 ITF.M NTJMRF.R: .7'..5': ¿:;7~3. S- /3 ACTION: INFORMATION: STII\JF.CT /PR OPOS A T JRF.QTJF.ST: Request approval of Appropriation #940060 in the amount of $18,305 for one-time purchases from the EOC Fund Balance CONSF.NT AGF.NnA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: A 17 ACHMF.NTS: STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker & Breeden & Ms. White RF.VTF.WF.D BV: BACKGROTJNn: On March 21, 1995 the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Management Board approved the use of $18,305 from their fund balance for one-time purchases for operation of the EOC. They are requesting this amount be appropriated from the current EOC fund balance of $76,798. DISCTJSSION: This request is primarily for upgrading data processing equipment. As one-time purchases, the EOC elected to fund these items from their fund balance rather than the FY 1995/96 operating budget. RF.COMMF.NnA TION: Staff recommends approval of the appropriation #940060 in the amount of $18,305. APP9460.wpd 95.065 1IP!! ,,}, , ", r":- _....',.................,.-. ,.,... , APPROPRIATION REQUEST FISCAL YEAR 94/95 NUMBER 940060 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? YES NO x FUND EMERGENCY OPR. CENTER PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: FUNDING OF ONE-TIME PURCHASES FROM FUND BALANCE. EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1410031040312710 1410031040600100 1410031040601100 1410031040800200 1410031040800301 1410031040800700 1410031040800710 ANNUAL SOFTWARE COST OFFICE SUPPLIES/DISPATCH CARDS UNIFORMS AND APPAREL FURNITURE AND FIXTURES COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT-REPLACEMENT DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT DATA PROCESSING SOFTWARE $500.00 3,075.00 3,000.00 1,300.00 830.00 8,100.00 1,500.00 TOTAL $18,305.00 2410051000510100 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ EOC FUND BALANCE $18,305.00 TOTAL $18,305.00 ************************************************************************ REQUESTING COST CENTER: EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER APPROVALS: SIGNATURE DATE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ~~A~ é/ La 4/?d/J¿ ~ ~.2.5- ;;.3) S-P-7J- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GENDA TITLE: ousing Counselor Appropriation AGENDA DATE: May 3, 1995 jL";-dL j?Þ.:S ITEM NUMBER: .9f;¿j15Ø5Y INFORMATION: ACTION: SUBJECTIPROPOSALIRE UEST: Request approval to appropriate $17,500 to increase Housing Counselor position to full-time CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: A TT ACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACT: ucker, White REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: During the budget process, the Board approved a part-time housing counselor position for the Housing Office using funds transferred from the Albemarle Housing Improvement Program, which no longer has a housing counseling component. Since the budget was adopted, additional funds have become available that would allow the County to expand the position to full-time with no additional local funding, DISCUSSION: Attached for your information is a sheet describing the responsibilities of the counseling position, as well as the identified costs of that program, which are approximately $35,500. Of these total costs, $18,000 has been transferred from AHIP leaving a balance of $17,500 needed to bring the position up to full-time and cover operating expenses. To assist with this remaining shortfall, Jefferson National Bank through their Community Reinvestment funds has generously donated $5,000 to initiate this full- spectrum housing counseling program. Therefore, the net amount needed to fund the program is $12,500 To fund the remainder, staff proposes to use local funds that have been freed up due to a recent grant award from HUD for an Family Self- Sufficiency Worker (FSS) position request. HUD has awarded $35,850 in administrative fees to the Housing Office to cover the costs of this FSS Counselor's position., a position that is already in place and has been funded in the current year and in the next fiscal year by local funds. Therefore, this grant will free up $35,850 in local funds to be used for other housing program costs. At this time, staff is requesting approval to use $12,500 of those freed up funds to cover the remainder of the position and operating costs for the new Housing Counselor program. Although the funds will not be used until the next fiscal year, staff is requesting approval now in order to be able to advertise and hire for the full-time position by July 1. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests approval from the Board to appropriate $17,500 to increase the housing counseling position to full-time beginning July 1, utilizing a $5,000 contribution and $12,500 in freed up local dollars. If the Board approves, this additional amount will be added to the FY 1995-96 budget appropriation ordinance that will come before the Board for approval at the first meeting in June. Attachment Houseexec.sam 95.070 '7 Int"II: I ;::J~1 ALBEMARLE HOUSING COUNSELING PROGRAM Responsibilities: · Provide training to Section 8 tenants as well as other rental groups on being a good tenant. · Provide home ownership counseling. · Develop programs for tenants and homeowners on maintaining residence and performing simple repairs. · Provide information on housing needs, programs and resources with community, including a newsletter and various resource guides. · Develop life skills training program in conjunction with School Division. Staffing: · One Housing Counselor position supervised by Housing Coordinator. Budget: Expenditures: Personnel Costs: · Salary (1 FTE) 20C Benefits Subtotal: Personnel Operations (mailings, newsletter, guides) TOTAL NEEDS $25,500 8.000 33,000 2.000 $35,500 Total Resources: · Transfer allocation from AHIP Contribution from Jefferson National Bank $18,000 5,000 · Total Needed: Remainder of Housing Counseling Positons & Operations $12,500 RWW/dbm 95.034 { ~ Jefferson National Bank ~® P.O. BOX 711. CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22902 · (804) 972-1100 I ! April 28, 1995 I I I I I Ms. Rioxanne W. White Assistant County Executive County of Albemarle 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902 ._-,-'...,.----.~.__..__..-. Jt.,@~.J_Uli -. ~28. ¡ J._~_~__~.,_'",... HD OF SUPEFi\"e ......._._.._.",...--0"." Dear Ms. White: Jefferson National Bank has been involved in a number of projects to help provide affordable housing to low/moderate individuals and families. Our experience is showing the greatest impediment to be that many of those we are attempting to assist are not ready for home ownership. We are finding there is a need for ongoing training and counseling to get these prospects ready. This counseling could take a year or more to complete and should include home ownership, budgeting, life skills, and home maintenance training. We have been working with Albemarle County for some time to develop a counseling program. This program has been drafted with a budget of $35,232. The Board of Supervisors has allocated $17,998, leaving a short fall of $17,234. The Bank would like to issue a challenge to the Board of Supervisors by offering to donate $5,000 as seed money to start the program provided the donation is approved by the Comptroller of the Currency. The Supervisors will be challenged to find the remaining $12,234 to fund the program. We will issue this challenge at the May 3, 1995, Board meeting. If this challenge is approved by the Board of Supervisors, we will then make our request for approval. This will facilitate the program's start as of July 1, 1995, which is the beginning of the County's fiscal year. If you have any questions, please let me know. Cordially yours, {' //~) r: />-,- ...j (7 Î/ LL'- Vd:'¿'C:p " Walter A. Pace, Jr. Vice Chairman WAP/sic WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, ~4- ./i'S- ~.5:¿;f~552- LETTER CARRIER FOOD DRIVE DAY in May, 1994, the National Association of Letter Carriers, assisted by the U. S. Postal Service, held its first food drive for the Charlottesville- Albemarle area food banks, soup kitchens, etc.; and this one-day project garnered more than 30,000 pounds of food which was channelled by the Thomas Jefferson Area Food Bank to more than 100 different agencies serving the County of Albemarle, the City of Charlottesville and seven surrounding counties; and the National Association of Letter Carriers in conjunction with Second Harvest, the Thomas Jefferson Area Food Bank and the U. S. Postal Service will be collecting nonperishable food items on Saturday, May 13, 1995; and on Saturday, May, 13, 1995, every postal customer can leave nonperishable food items in bags near their mail boxes. When the letter carrier comes by delivering mail on his or her route, the food will be collected, taken back to the Main Post Office and delivered to Second Harvest - Thomas Jefferson Area Food Bank. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Walter F. Perkins, Chairman, on behalf of the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors, do hereby recogmze Saturday, May 13, 1995, as LEITER CARRÆR FOOD DRIVE DAY in Albemarle and call upon all citizens to recognize the significance of this event and to help make the event a success. CHAIRMAN ALBEMARLE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS '0;5+ 'f!5/~~ BRANCH 518 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS P.O. BOX 6665 CHARLOTTESVILliE, viRGINIA 22906 !Is 7° " V\o...:J b~. 0. ,,)CÁ. rt', J ! 0, :> f t11 0) he_~~ 0- ~D~ J, r; v( ~ {". ~ ) V. ," t'( {, ,.)/'" ;:. '" +( . -T'k ~ () ,rl \1 .D ., r.. r. 0 _ n r- c , .' /.- _ Ii. ~ ex.," '-.. 'IV ,~~~ , . . ¡" 'i? {'tJJ\'1 Ib!:. cd~\+~.c~ J ~,qÇ'({f tî;f(\:J ii" \" \ ~. (" ~[-,., "lh ~ \ f r.--o A, '-^' o.¿; ~ 11'\ ~) tY A f-- C .) :~~'I ,š'f~~~ h i +(~ C(,(t.1'" {ö1tt> ( \J t I( f - Ii (b~W\(\v'("(_ 'J/; ~ of I[)"{)\Î..<' t,\ r J I, fe.y- V I Sc r5 " ~.:, fcÀ. \ r . .':::,9"(' VI ( f' 0...,,,, ('. ~:-A... ÍD61.'- K ç )0 'J (p J IJ f \::J~ '- t o. ,^-Á ~o.. I'" \". t' (" of' d 0 V E'/V" \ -f ;. I ,. r:. ~ ,.Q ^ f" ; \N' f-' vf.'--"- () e~ t f ~ f' v 1 (h""" '\ ~ u . ex , I I ( j I '/ +k~. -r/\o\~() s "f,,-4t:~('n:,,- ¡1~c' ("~.A Eo t.,- K t() ') \,}E> í C~('À''\ \...~ \, -f:G\ b '<:. { kcu-I f. ttf-':; " r I ,.. fl {().0/1"<'- ¡r.j t' 0( ~A (~ ff.-.:. - J -:So J 15tH::' (~",IC{ ,: 1t...~. i ('j1) c4; ffeD"-^\.f o.~f-> ·\AC ~ f> S, S ~ {" 'J ;J;j _'; \.' '( 'f'f)v V'- (~ , ~^'.j <'':' 0 -^ ,./,-t \. € S \ .s~ V <2-t·, -\T~-\ \.o...)(l~ 0\1..\ ..-Ç ;':( 0'.1t<'> \V"pt. ~L\;) y~(.u· q'~ h --tkcc'\ . -==c o'~ w /" t \ 'j + c yc. I..... ñ/1o- '/ (] th, W ~ 0.. .i -+~'t l tfJ:" ( I . -f {""G.> I I ~'" -t e \A.~ --to b \I' ; \ J (H- +~~ ,Ji('~\'e Co "'{'~ l'¡I\.o..i 0 'Í ·f 0 1':1..<; t t~,· ,00.r h ..e t f \ '"' 5 (' ,,\'1....(' v-J cUI ' c(.,vt' '('(ìJ~ .J 6.^--1' uJ 'l1l ~'O ,P 11'\ ìc" Y'P(t r, S-\ I ( .~ LQ n< r Cr;. r- '(, \-; '\ C.O\. r,€o..r (_.v~ ~o, J. $c '/\1\.:<2.. .--' -r V 0.. \AJ V\ 'êw ~ r:" fl') y- -tOAC/k: X'fLJ'.) r~ ·t·e> '\'\k\f\ 0,...... ^.O\0 '....J(J eiFJ'>ct '"' ~ è-e) you.. CO'J- {.~ ~cLr.e. c. f n (J0..l-\Nt.f··! ~ çc 0D(>.... ~J J ur'l\! f '" I J) 0.. f '(1,\"J (\ t w (hLt-Q O'í ·{\'\..c..k 0.. ~ '-^- b ( \' c. 'ê~<f~(;" \lLt.. l "- (e ,.-¡ .n .c \,,, c.X -i-{\ ,"(' cù 0... r- 1- f.w C'. (l. tl\,ç -U' I '" { ,ç \J Q/ t ,.- c- ... - h'\.\A ( t" \ v\ .\",. €.l fl'\'tf' Ou.. í P' "1 ..M' v . ·f fOc" r1'. . ~ If:" ~I'- JO" e ~ (' ; ( k ,II-\. "~.c....._ + (x- m i-v-..þ e ...J.1, (-\...... ~ 'f-.·fQ...r \ ~ v-Cf., 0--;: \ ;'\..,€ ()v-. +(~: -r ':)(....) t.... +~ \'\'\.. ~ \.. ð b G... { D~"j W C.L \( \1'V~ " \ (f~Jf ît'f r-..~ JI.~. &) E' h t; el '1 let Y1/\e. t;" Dw ' w"( \ I 6 "}~(f:' tD ~-e I f 'AS. fì e(.l t,~. 0...'\ -fly, 0. b 1'\ oJ¿' a..¿J& rr-<; i -\{ ¡VlL fe e. I YtJ 1...". 1 'Y\ it\~ i v~.V'! R~s ~(tt~., ( I;) \A30'í'~ k \ù k, (r "= (t\.J..5. e , "(", \.".....J..^ ---\~ Cll.,'- r- <ßtA !, ( '" I"^ .-. '. . ,Ll \A.. BRANCH.SI8 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF. LETTER CARRIERS ~QBOX 66ß5 CHARLarTESVI'L~,VIRGINIA 22906 ~<;, Gif'ey) , rJ-lÅ/'-. . e.\.A cloi f ~ ~- G:, f 'I r +t \e\ e r. D2.. (j \ . .~ r '("Y> S.\ "1 (lrt.vl û ffé sv· d I ~ ·'1.v ~ -tL~{t vJ ~ \ ( (f --tD --:I ..ç 't'v- .befl.) \"e 2 ·.;So r ('11 . i-( i¿ (Jot) 0- ~ J (Y" ~ S e S tv~ " ~ ~ \.) x~+ l ,\.eA" It" 5t,,;,~ J: ) pl~" 9'" "øJ I 9£ ~.-1~ llf o.~.x-. AI &~~(lr I~. . -,'" it I( L q(~-(b'( 0'\ 11\(" -VI. ~ r- "II:,'J.. '\j ~ II' 'J I "-1\. V. cL I . ~Ü ~A. r Cb7A..~ i ~'(W'C\. t- (~ I ~r-- ~u-.\ , ~ t::. V\ V\I\ (~ ~ ~~ l\«V-e I J A £r. '0« G . () r (II. ~ . L C- o J LETTER CARRIERS~ ANNUAL FOOD DRIVE The National Association of Letter Carriers, in conjunction with Second Harvest - Thomas Jefferson Area Food Bank, and the U. S. Postal Service will be collecting non - perishable food items on SATURDA~ MAY 13~ 1995. On Saturday, May 13, 1995 every postal customer can simply leave food items (non -perishable) in bags by their mail boxes. When your city letter carrier comes by delivering your mail on his or her route, the food will be collected, taken back to the Main Post Office, and delivered to Second Harvest- Thomas Jefferson Area Food Bank. Please join us in helping our community by participating in the largest one-day food drive in our Nation's history. Everyone from the National .i\.ssociation of Letter Carriers, Second Harvest, and the U. S. Postal Service would like to thank you in advance for your kindness, generosity, and concern for our community. , 1..:. PROCLAMATION GIVE AIR A BRAKE WEEK WHEREAS, this is a critical period of growth and change in this region and it is vital that elected officials demonstrate and act upon the understanding that new problems call for creative visions; and WHEREAS, in order to avoid the nightmare of traffic congestion and air pollution in pristine communities such as ours, MA Y 1 - 5, 1995, has been set aside as Give Air A Brake Week to establish a way to raise the awareness of the citizenry in this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED, that the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does hereby recognize and commend the thousands of area employees who will do their part for clean air and traffic reduction by carpooling, walking, cycling, taking a bus, telecommuting, or trying other alternatives to single-occupant driving at least once during GIVE AIR A BRAKE WEEK w~ +-eL~" CHAIRMAN ALBEMARLE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS 05-01-95 03:30 TJPDC 210 P02 -,' .. Charlottesville-Albemarle Big Whul Employen Commuter Opportunities Group MAY 11æ> c/o the Char1ott~.sviIlp.-Albtmarle Metropolitan Planning (ñ¡anizatiQn 413 East Market Sf-' t Suit lO'? C'L_..1- t ·lIe rT" 22902 '~-~",.~.,,,.__. .' ee J t! ~ ru.J,I wI t!SV1 ~ J'.n. "'. " (804) 972-1720 (phone); 972-1719 (fax) ..... " .. L.... May 1, 1995 TO: The Honorable Walter F. Perkins, and Members of the Board of Supervisors, County of Albemarle Ou htl\Alf of th~ ComMutc, Opportuniû,& Group of the ChulottetivH1e..A1bemarlf', Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the Blue Ridge Region of the American ~g A'lisociation, I thank the C;ounty and all its employees for your participation in Give Air a Brake every year. I partlcularly commend Pat Mullaney and Juandiego Wade, the County employees who have made the County a valuable partner in every Give Air a Brake event and have provided much a.'lisistance to the Commuter Opportunities Group. In this criûcal period of growth and change in our region, it is vital that our elected offidals demonstrate and act upon the understanding that new problems call for creative visions. If we wish to avoid the traffic congestion and ajr vullution that have become the nightmare of communities once as pristine as ours, we must act now to establish new ways. In this spirit, the Commuter Opportunities Group requests the Board of Supervisors to adopt a resolution recognizing the importance of Give Air a Brake Week to this community in raising awareness and promoting action to prevent traffic congestion and air pollution. We further ask the Board to recognize the thousands of area employees who will do their part for clean air and traffic reduction by carpooHng. walkin¡. cycling. taking a bus, telecommuting, or trying other alternatives to single-occupant driving at least once this week, with special cUlnmcndation to the many who Give Air a Brake all year. Fiuwly, we ask you, as we do all Give Air a Brake participants, to consider how you c:an further your commitment beyond this week, both as ~n employe! and as the body which develops and implements the tong-term goals of. this c~mm~mty. The ~ and the Commuter Opportunities Group stand ready to asSlSt y?U tn thIS .process, and 1ß turn need your help in making our regional goal of traffic reduction a reahty. Thank you for YO\Jr consideration. ~in ere1y, j;/ I / ~ Iii W;W illiam D. Vining, cn:::ln, MPO Commuter Opponunilies Group p;~;,wïi~g Traffic Ré~ct¡;;~-",,,,w'~--"""'._"''''''''--''''''''''--''-''''''_'''''M''·....·......··.._····.....·········pro,;[;¡iïïiCommûtë,·ÃTiëñìãiiVês d-.7,P'-4¿; / /~ ,'J',;?'- ~ 5 ty, ~çj/ The Board of Directors of the Albemarle County Service Authority met in regular session on March 16, 1995 at 9:00 a.m. Members Present: Mr. Parker, Vice-Chairman; Messrs. Mdyè-t- J~ ~~rter" Bolton APR ? ll~ Members Absent: Mr. Lumpkin, Mr. Humphris Staff Present: Messrs. Brent, Kister, Shoop, Bowling; Mrs. Thacker The Vice-Chairman called the meeting to order and a quorum was established. The minutes of the February 23, 1995 Board meeting were reviewed and approved. Execution of Aqreements Concerninq Sewer Easement Encroachment - Briarwood Mr. Brent stated that before the Board were two agreements concerning two single-family attached houses in Br iarwood subdivision that were built with decks encroaching into a sewer easement. Mr. Brent explained that these agreements allow the property owners to keep the decks but they must be removed on demand by the Service Authority. Mr. Brent asked that the Vice- Chairman be authorized to execute these agreements. Mr. Moyer moved the Vice-Chairman be authorized to execute the agreements, seconded by Mr. Wagner. All members voted aye. (Agreements attached as page ____) Electric Rate Contract - Virqinia Power Mr. Brent stated that every three years the Virginia Municipal League and the Virginia Association of Counties, on behalf of the counties and municipalities in the state, negotiate with the various electric companies in the state for county and municipal rates. Mr. Brent stated that the electric rates that have been negotiated for the three years beginning this past July are a reduction from what the Service Authority is currently paying. He recommended the Board authorize execution of the contract with Virginia Power. Mr. Wagner moved to authorize execution of the contract, seconded by Mr. Bolton. All members voted aye. Review of Capital Improvement proiects Crozet/Brownsville Water Line Mr. Shoop stated that the contractor will start construction March 20, 1995 on the Crozetj Brownsville water line. Route 29 Improvements - Mr. Shoop stated that the contractor for the Route 29 project is currently working on a sewer line serving Greenbrier Drive. He will also make a water connection at Dominion Drive and Route 29 for the Service Authority. Geoqraphic Information System - Mr. Shoop stated that he has started digitizing maps of utilities and the subdivisions in the northern Albemarle area. Deeds of Easement - Deerwood Subdivision Mr. Brent stated that there were three typical deeds of easement before the Board for a sewer line in the Deerwood subdivision and asked that the Vice-Chairman be authorized to execute them. Mr. Moyer moved the Vice-Chairman be authorized to execute the deeds, seconded by Mr. Bolton. All members voted aye. Mitchum vs. Albemarle County Service Authority Mr. Brent informed the Board of a letter he received from Mr. Owens, attorney for ACSA's insurer, stating that the Supreme Court refused the plaintiff's Petition for Appeal. Therefore, the Mitchum vs. Albemarle County Service Authority case is over. 2 Executive Session - Leqal Matter Mr. Bolton moved the Board go into Executive Session to discuss a possible legal matter concerning Virginia Land Trust, in accordance with Section 2.1-344.7 of the Virginia State Code, as amended, seconded by Mr. Wagner. All members voted aye. The Board carne back into regular session and Mr. Brent read into the record a resolution certifying that only matters so stated previously, and exempted from discussion in open session, were discussed in executive session. Mr. Wagner moved to adopt the resolution, seconded by Mr. Bolton. The Vice-Chairman asked for a roll call vote: Mr. Moyer, Aye; Mr. Bolton, Aye; Mr. Parker, Aye; Mr. Wagner, Aye. (Resolution attached as page There being no further business, Mr. Wagner moved the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Mr. Bolton. All members voted aye. J. W. Brent, Secretary-Treasurer 3 THIS AGREEMENT is made this 7th day of March, 1995, by and between ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY, "ACSA", Grantor, and WOODBRIAR ASSOCIATES, "Woodbriar", Grantee, and provides: WHEREAS, Woodbriar is the owner of that certain lot or parcel of land in Albemarle County, Virginia, containing 4626 square feet, the "Property", described as Lot 9 on the attached plat showing physical survey (Exhibit 1) titled "Lot 9, Phase IIIA, Briarwood, Rivanna District, Albemarle County, Virginia", dated February 24, 1995, prepared by Roger W. Ray & Assoc., Inc., the "Plat"; and WHEREAS, ACSA is the grantee of a twenty foot (20 I) wide sanitary sewer easement across the Property by an instrument of record in the Clerk I s Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1400, page 474, the "Easement"; and WHEREAS, the Property contains a board wall, fence and deck that encroach upon the Easement as shown and described on Exhibit 1 and the parties desire to memorialize their agreement with respect to said encroachment. THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the Grantor hereby grants and conveys unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns the right to reconstruct, maintain and repair the board wall, fence and deck attached to the residence located upon the Property only as shown on Exhibit 1, it being the intention of the parties that the size and location of the board wall, fence and deck shall not be altered from that shown on Exhibit 1. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the cost of all such reconstruction, maintenance and repair shall be the sole responsibility of the Grantee, its successors and assigns, regardless of the cause for such reconstruction, maintenance or repair. By its signature hereto the Grantee, its successors and assigns save and hold harmless the Grantor trom any and all liability to contribute to the cost of reconstruction, maintenance or repair of the board wall, fence and deck under any circumstance whatsoever, including, but not limited to, construction, maintenance or repair of the Grantor's property within the Easement. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the Grantor has no liability to the Grantee, its successor or assigns, if the Grantor needs to remove all or a portion of the board wall, fence or deck, or damages the board wall, fence or deck as a result of repair or replacement of the sanitary sewer line within the easement area. Repair or replacement of the board wall, fence and deck shall be the sole responsibility of the Grantee, its successors and assigns. In addition, the Grantee is obligated to reimburse the Grantor as a result of the cost of repairs or replacement of the sewer line directly associated with the encroachment of the board wall, fence and deck within the easement referred to herein. Except as expressly modified hereby the Easement remains in full force and effect. ·WITNESS the following signatures and seals: ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY By 2 WOODBRIAR ASSOCIATES BY: S-V ASSOCIATES, General Partner By Wendell W. Wood General Partner STATE OF VIRGINIA AT LARGE CITY/COUNTY OF , to-wit: The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before the undersigned notary public on the day of 1995, by of the ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY. My commission expires: Notary Public STATE OF VIRGINIA AT LARGE CITY/COUNTY OF , to-wit: The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before the undersigned notary public on the day of , 1995, by WENDELL W. WOOD, General Partner of S-V Associates. My commission expires: Notary Public 3 "'c;:¡ w ...... c;:¡ .-. ...... ..-. ill ill U1 tv .-. .-. -...J .-. I CD c;:¡ ~ I !'oJ ill 01 I -...J 01 c¡) U1 'lJ J> ;;U ^ fT1 ;;U "" t; fT1 U) ~ fT1 " J> Z o 'lJ J> (j) fT1 c¡) !'oJ ......... ..~}..~HnS Q.ÿ~... .- ~ ~~Z-Z> .. . . I I££l ~ : A'VHi\\~ . . . +'4.. ~'Ø~ ð: ..... '?' O. \~ .Š- .:0 ~-:_ --~ yP.- .. </0 IiJ.TV~" ........ 0Nn0.:I . NO!!I a:: w 3: w (/) o N "CBd '13.1 CNnO.:l -N~I ·SN't'!!l ~3MOd l- e:( -J n. N O· ~ r--~ g .J rtl CD 10 . .... ~ C ~ . 3::>N3.:1 ·31.'fl:ln00V GNV 3.L3ld~0C> SJ .Lf NOINldO 1\fNOISS3::10~d A~ NJ aNY .:131138 \> NOll.Vt'H::lO.:lNJ '30031MON>4 ^~::IO .LS3e 3Hl 01 'lV1d StHl NO NMOHS A.l.H3dO~d 3Hl 03A3AI:ms r Ç6-17~-Z NO LVH.l A:::Illtl3:J A83t13H I ·.:1"5 9Z;9Þ 6 .1.01 .____~J!.~H~~O 1e9'Þ 'ON ·J.W58/M 3W'v'~ A~OLS Z ,z"Z£ "11\f Nt Al~V d 01 .LOl .~ 'S- ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. \" <Ø. ~ () ~ CD a^~o 13^Væ 8 1.01 M..sr.9£.£ZS =ro ,LS'017 =:) .00"Z17 =l .0o"Zg ;;~ ..8£.91.917 ='\1 ø -, , , , / -- (.OÞ) lèfnO~ . 3101~O 3A1~0 NLlsnv f 0.1 >.9£1 SZvO, tfINIÐ~I^ '3ll/AS3l10lèitfH::> ':>N£ '":>OSSt1 i A ';1 ~ "M èl390èl >UN\1 A "1 \1è1083a !!O.:i Sì6-ÞZ-Z =31 \fa ,OG = ..I =31'1:>S '1INIÐ~I^ I ^lNno~ 31è:fv~381'1 l~IHiSla ~NN'1 ^I~ aOOM~\flèt8 \flU 3S\fHd '6 .LOl A.3^~nS l'1:>ISAHd '(Oflo-ÞIL "S"QJ 1N3W3S\13 39'VN1"~a 'J un.L.O '0 "(Olg-61L 'B"Q) "'tJ ^ .:10 '0::> "13J.. l'ifW.~ 01. .LN~3S'tJ3 .:> 'U. nd 89£ 'l,9£-ÞOVl 'S'O 'J 90L -ZIL 'S"O) 'dCO:) :>IW.:)313 )t:)ONM1H'VfddVè:I 0.1. lN3W3S'tJ3 '8 '11 '1ld 179Ç "Z9g-IZD 'S'O) rS3WV(]NOOS llYM A.Lè:I\1d E>NUrtUJ.SNO:> 3NJl .Ld3:>X3.) 3Nn .uædO&l H:)V3 OJ. .lN3~YrOV 03l\è:l3S~ 51 1.N3W3S\'3 AJ.llI.1.n " :Ð\'NI'tJHQ .01 'V =9NIMOTIO.:l 3H1. 0.1 1::>3rens 6 1.0l 'S ·C3HSINè:ln.:J l.èlOd3è:1 31ill ON 'þ .~ 3NOZ NI CI3.1 \'::>01 51 1.08 (NIVld 0001.:::1 ~'tJ3). 001) ~ 3NOZ N 311 lON S300 AJJ:BdOèid SIHl. {B gZIO 9000lg l:3N\'d Á1INn~~OJ) 08-91-Zl 03.1 \'0 d\'W 31. \fè:l 3:>NYèlnSNI OOOl.::! 3H.L 01. :>NIO~OJ:>V '£ '.L \11d 179g 'G9Ç-IZ£1 's"a ¡ Z£G-069 '8'0 :S3:)N3~3.:13!! lV~3l 'G "S31 'ÇI'I:>OSS~ èI\1I~8aOOM :{S}~3NMO '\ :S3.LON THIS AGREEMENT is made this 13th day of March, 1995, by and between ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY, "ACSA", Grantor, and H. DOUGLAS WARNER and CATHERINE A. SPAIN, "Warner and Spain", Grantees, and provides: WHEREAS, Warner and Spain are the owners of that certain lot or parcel of land in Albemarle County, Virginia, known as 4685 Oriole Court, the "Property", described as Lot 10 on the attached plat showing physical survey (Exhibit 1) titled "Lot 10, Phase IIIA, Briarwood, Albemarle County, Virginia", dated October 5, 1994, prepared by B. Aubrey Huffman & Assoc., Ltd., the "Plat"; and WHEREAS, ACSA is the grantee of a twenty foot (20') wide sanitary sewer easement across the Property by an instrument of record in the Clerk I s Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1400, page 474, the "Easement"; and WHEREAS, the Property contains a deck that encroaches upon the Easement as shown and described on Exhibit 1 and the parties desire to memorialize their agreement with respect to said encroachment. THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the Grantor hereby grants and conveys unto the Grantees, their successors and assigns the right to reconstruct, maintain and repair the deck attached to the residence located upon the Property only as shown on Exhibit 1, it being the intention of the parties that the size and location of the deck shall not be altered from that shown on Exhibit 1. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the cost of all such reconstruction, maintenance and repair shall be the sole responsibility of the Grantees, their successors and assigns, regardless of the cause for such reconstruction, maintenance or repair. By their signatures hereto the Grantees, their successors and assigns, save and hold harmless the Grantor from any and all liability to contribute to the cost of reconstruction, maintenance or repair of the deck under any circumstance whatsoever, including, but not limited to, construction, maintenance or repair of the Grantor I s property within the Easement. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the Grantor has no liability to the Grantee, its successor or assigns, if the Grantor needs to remove all or a portion of the deck, or damages the deck as a result of repair or replacement of the sanitary sewer line within the easement area. Repair or replacement of the deck shall be the sole responsibility of the Grantees, their successors and assigns. In addition, the Grantees are obligated to reimburse the Grantor as a result of the cost of repairs or replacement of the sewer line directly associated with the encroachment of the deck within the easement referred to herein. Except as expressly modified hereby the Easement remains in full force and effect. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY By 2 · . (SEAL) H. Douglas Warner Catherine A. Spain (SEAL) STATE OF VIRGINIA AT LARGE CITY/COUNTY OF , to-wit: The foregoing instrument was subscribed and the undersigned notary public on the day of 1995, by of the ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY. sworn to before , My commission expires: Notary Public STATE OF VIRGINIA AT LARGE CITY/COUNTY OF , to-wit: The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before the undersigned notary public on the day of 1995, by H. DOUGLAS WARNER and CATHERINE A. SPAIN. My commission expires: Notary Public 3 .. .'.. .. ~ ... .' _..._~....- .' 'A'.' Jill J ".J I I THIIII Tþ C!ItT1N TtfÂT ON ð("À-4~/(. \$; /'1"", . . 8U~ID TH!! PROPIInY IHOWN ON THIS "&.At AND TH~T THt T1TCE LINES AND WI'LLI OF ml 8UILDIHGI MI 'HOWN: HERtON . ~. oJ~¡lfV'"rr ur"¿."r,,rJ Alfr VN'ð4"f*dlJ'ile/NP. . . /VI) rtri£ ~;!"¡Ød"r ;er"~'fN.uH~&! ~'" u. ~ð,fØf"" lJ" "-4'¿J,A'rF"lY IV Ndr /N ;f Al.el.o. P'''-/Nt!2'1 ,'N ,rr"~ ,.er¿NI¿) Z'tJA/tt:' dvr it'S ~t:I~;9nn;,,,# ,.-;¥NP ,,¡rþ~ ~" ~ .s~ð'~ ~N' "",,..,,,~rrY /"",Na .....vð. ~ð¿:1&1~ ·ð/2$'6, '"1n ~ --~I '''C) --.... . TWY~~ ; :ltHoÞ; ¡f:: ..~~ : '6\ . .. ...-: DI": . . Of . ..'" . ( ...J_,~ u..l.. .' ,.\'D~~"~ 1 ! , ....-.-........... - ~ ~ k II ~ \, ,,' ). ~~~~ \i I ~" ..~: ~t'I~~~ ~ It · ~ ~ ""'I~'t ~ ~ ~ 'n to; 1 " ~~~~~ t (. ,,';t i ~. ~ \ I' ~ I , ~ ~ø'l ~ ;11 .,.. I, c: _ ,_ _~. '.> /" ¿(J,../I ...-- ....~ ; ~..~t I ~4~~ . Doug sWarner . ~o.~ ~ Catherin-e A. Spa! I . I . I ! I ð1r/d¿C . ~ðV/f r (~ '4'¡N) L- .. i tSCAttl/~ ¿'tJ' PHytrICI4¿ G{/~Vøy alTðMW~ t.dr /0 - PN'~J£ .zzr,lf ð/f'/"';fW""O .; ",4 t..l4"rfAt[I.£ CbtlNrt, VÍ1tS/tV/A CI14r'$, /,.,'1' D. AUBREY HUFFMAN , ASSOCIATES. 'L T_. CIVIL ENGINEERING . L.ÀND SURVEYING . LAND PLANNING CtV\RlOTfESVlLLI!, VlAGINIA MOTION: Mr. Bolton RESOLUTION NO: 1 SECOND: ME. Wagner MEETING DATE: March 16, 1995 CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE MEETING WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Albemarle County Service Authority has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, §2 .1-344,7 of the Code of Virginia certification by this Board that such executive conducted in conformity with Virginia law; requires a meeting was NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board. VOTE: AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 (For each nay vote, the substance of the departure from the requirements of the Act should be described). ABSENT DURING VOTE: Mr. Lumpkin, Mr. Humphris ABSENT DURING MEETING: Mr. Lumpkin, Mr. Humpþris J. W. Brent, Secretary {/-/ ~ ;95: .;:13 t~~ 5.Ç RIVANNA WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY P. O. BOX 18 . CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22902-00le .(804) 977-2970 .'"1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS -)!j " 8 ,~ REGULAR MEETING MARCH 27 , 1995 The Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Board of Directors held its regular monthly meeting on March 27, 1995. Members present were William Brent, Cole Hendrix, Tony lachetta, Judith Mueller, and Robert Tucker. Authority staff present were William Sessoms, Gene Potter, Chuck Kent, Sherrie Guyton- Ralston and Linda Bragg. Also present were Fred Landess, David Hirschman, and the public. Dr. lachetta called the meeting to order at 2:08 p.m. Mrs. Mueller moved approval of the minutes of the February 27 meeting. Mr. Tucker seconded. All voted aye. Regarding the Consent Agenda, Dr. lachetta noted the revised Training Policy makes reference to the "Deputy Director". This should be amended as the Water & Sewer Authority does not (at least currently) have a Deputy Director. Staff agreed to this modification. Mr. Potter reported he expects to have in hand by mid-April the Black & Veatch report on the safe yield determination at North Rivanna. He also noted the Authority had, as of last week, completely sold out of compost. Mr. Hendrix moved approval of the Consent Agenda. Mr. Tucker seconded. All voted aye. The staff reports on operations and capital projects are attached as Exhibits I and II. Mr. Potter briefly reviewed a supplemental staff report on line maintenance needs. That report is attached as Exhibit III. Staff is recommending that the proposed budget for line maintenance be approved as presented. At the Board's request, staff did corroborate with the Service Authority (on sharing) and was able to realize a $ 10,000 reduction from the line maintenance program which was originally proposed. A final decision was deferred until such time as the Budget is adopted. ŒJ SERVING CHARLOTTESVILLE 8< ALBEMARLE COUNTY Mr. Potter reported the salary survey is on-going and he will have the results to the Board no later than April 19. Preliminary frndings, however, indicate that some of Rivanna's entry levels (in particular the operator positions) are as much as three g1!ldes lower than those localities they are being compared to - which include the City of Harrisonburg, the Harrisonburg-Rockingham Regional Authority, Stafford County, Appomattox Water Authority and the Town of Culpeper. Mrs. Mueller questioned whether the rates were likely to be impacted by the findings. Mr. Potter noted that is a good possibility. It was noted that bids are due on the Administration Building Improvements on April 27. Staff is suggesting that consideration of those bids be put on the agenda with the Budget, for May 1. The Board concurred for this to be done. Mr. Potter presented an updated Capital Improvement Program, noting his cover memorandum covered the most significant changes from the last version. He reported, perhaps the most notable change is moving into the current five year plan the expansion of the Crozet Water Plant due to ConAgra's request for additional water. Mr. Potter also noted many of the numbers in the report need to be reviewed and verified as to their origin. Mrs. Mueller questioned who would oversee the Administration Building Improvements job. Mr. Potter noted Mr. Darnell, as well as Rivanna's engineer would oversee the project. It was suggested that Rivanna ''buy more time" from Mr. Darnell, or whomever, for this purpose. At 2:38 p.m. Mrs. Mueller moved that the Board go into Executive Session for a personnel matter. Mr. Tucker seconded. All voted aye. At 2:45 poom. the Board came back to Open Session. Mr. Hendrix moved that the attached Resolution (Exhibit IV) be approved. Mrs. Mueller seconded. By roll call vote, all voted aye. Mr. Hendrix moved that the meeting be adjourned. Mrs. Mueller seconded. All voted aye. Dr. Iachetta adjourned the meeting at 2:46 p.m. Respectfully submitted, [I E X H I BIT I RIVANNA WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY P. O. BOX 1B . CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22902-001B . (804) 977-2970 -.. ------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: FROM: BOARD OF DIRECTORS EUGENE K. POTTER ldce~( DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS MARCH 218\ 1994 DATE: SUBJECT: OPERATIONS REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 1995 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Water production for the month of February was as follows: Observatory WTP 4.740 MGD S. Rivanna 5.501 MGD N. Rivanna .185 MGD TOTAL URBAN 10.426 MGD Crozet WTP 0.675 MGD Scottsville WTP 0.124 MGD th On March 20 Ragged Mountain was down 5'6". were full. All other reservoirs The Moores Creek WWTP treated 11.062 MGD and averaged 3 mg/l for BOD and 6 mg/l for suspended solids for the month. Camelot WWTP treated 0.116 MGD and averaged 23 mg/l for BOD and 22 mg/l for suspended solids. Glenmore WWTP treated .034 MG per discharge day and averaged 6 mg/l for BOD and 13 mg/l for suspended solids. EKP/rl1 SERVING CHARLOTTESVILLE Be ALBEMARLE COUNTY ~~'t~ & 5("'(;>. .<t"" ,"Co .<t ~: § .'>5 ~ ~ ~ ..... 01', OTTESV\\\t. E X H I BIT I I RIVANNA WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY P. O. BOX Ie . CHARLOTTESVILLE. VIRGINIA 22902-0018 . (804) 977-2970 ... TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS EUGENE K. POTIER, ACTING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: STATUS OF ACTIVE CAPITAL PROJECTS U~*Q' FROM: DATE: MARCH 22, 1995 The following reflects the status of the active capital projects: URBAN WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN Construction on Division 'A' has reached the Charlottesville High School property. Site restoration over complete sections is proceeding, and temporary pavement repair has been completed over most of the installed pipeline. One section of pipe 1700' long has been filled in preparation for pressure testing. Division 'B' pipeline installation outside the water treatment plant is nearly complete. In-plant work is likewise nearly complete, with one major remaining component scheduled for early May delivery. Berkmar Drive sub grade is nearly complete, and will soon be ready for subbase stone. LICKINGHOLE CREEK RUNOFF CONTROL BASIN Greenbriar Farms has mobilized on site with plant materials for the constructed wetlands. Work is expected to be complete by the end of March. So far the plants appear to be in full dormancy, so the relatively late start should not be a factor in survivability of the plantings. Planting of these plants is the last remaining work to be done on this construction project. MOORES CREEK WWTP TOXICITY REDUCTION EVALUATION (TRE) The final set of TRE samples ha5 been collected. The Authority has now completed all of the requirements of the TRE and is in the position to request termination of the TRE and modification of the Moores Creek WWTP discharge permit to omit the current toxicity standard. This request will be made coincident with submittal of the test results to DEQ. SCOTISVILLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS Construction is nearing completion on the structural portion of this project. All major concrete work is complete. Site work to bring the site to final grade is proceeding. Delivery of the majority of mechanical systems is expected in April. SERVING CHARLOTTESVILLE Be ALBEMARLE COUNTY ~ March 22, 1995 Page -2- ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS Plans and specifications are complete and the project will be advertised shortly for bid opening on April 27. RIVANNA PUMP STATION ODOR CONTROL Design is underway with a currently planned schedule to advertise the project in late April, award of contract in mid-May with construction completion by the end of June. EKP/ldb E X H I BIT I I I Supplement to Staff Report on Line Maintenance Needs Computer Enhancement Febr1:l&ry 21, 19Ð5- Revised March 27, 1995 The City of Charlottesville is in the process of developing a GIS system with utilities and other layers in an Autocad mapping environment. The Albemarle County Service Authority is a major participant in the mapping of utilities,and certain areas which were photographed for mapping were included at the request of RWSA. It is requested that we budget for computer hardware and software to enable us to use the digitized maps which are presently being produced by the City's consultant. Digitizing our system will enable us to better manage our line maintenance maps in several ways: Changes to the water and sewer system (line relocations, road widenings, new connections, eg.) will be much easier to track with a design package which will allow us to incorporate the changes directly onto the project map. In addition, all of our systems can be placed into one digital file which also incorporates roads, gas lines, buildings, etc. This will allow us to analyze our systems in reference to each other and in reference to the surroundings in ways which are not practical with paper maps. It will also be simple to make copies of all or portions of the system, which adds to the security of our records, and makes the plans more accessible to consultants who need to design around our facilities. With Autocad it will also be possible to design some pipeline or plant improvements in- house, rather than contracting for engineering services. The design capabilities of Autocad will make updates and additions relatively easy to accomplish, particularly since the City, ACSA, and R WSA waterlines will all be integrated into one package. As a likely future benefit, there are software packages available which incorporate KYPIPE into the Autocad environment. This will allow us to do flow analyses using the Autocad pipeline data file. A proposed budget for these expenditures is attached. At the previous Board Meeting, it was suggested that some cost savings could be realized by sharing computer functions and hardware with the City or Service Authority. The Service Authority has a plotter which could be used by R WSA on an occasional basis and will probably serve our needs, and it appears that an erasable CD ROM will not be necessary for routine use. These items have been eliminated on the revised budget sheet which is attached. A standard CD ROM has been added so we will be able to read the initial data file. It was also suggested that for little additional money, a Pentium computer and additional mass memory should be acquired. The revised budget incorporates these changes. Items which have been eliminated are shown as "strike-outs", and new expense items (Standard CD ROM, Pentium, and additional memory) are in italics. AUTOCAD COMPUTER BUDGET (REVISED March 27, 1995) Hardware: (Workstation compatible with equipment and programs being used by City) 486/66 computer with 16 Mb RAM (Pentium) 1.44 and 1.2 Floppy (and CD ROM drive) 330 :Mb- Hard disk (HiØI CtwocítY HD) Mouse ATI Graphics UltraPRO w/2Mb RAM 17" Monitor Uninterruptible Power Source (UPS) Relax Erasable Gï*ical System ~CD ROM) (Not required for routine use) NovaJET II Plotter (ACSA plotter wü/ be available for occasional use) Calcomp Drawing Bòard II (Digitizer) Software: AutoCAD, ArcCAD, arc VIEW, ArcSpatialist, CAD Overlay GSX Training, Miscellaneous TOTAL: $ 7,100.00 ($ 7,5(X)./XJ) $ 3,500.00 $ 7,000.00 $ .-1,750.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 2.000.00 $ 28,350.00 ($ 18,2$0.«1) " , E X H I BIT I V RES 0 L UTI 0 N WHEREAS, the Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by this Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia Law; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this certification resolution applies, (ii) only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority. VOTE AYES: Mr. Brent, Mr. Hendrix, Dr. Iachetta, Mrs. Mueller & Mr. Tucker NAYS: NONE Absent During Vote: NONE Absent During Meeting: NONE This is certified to be a true and exact copy of Resolution passed by the Board of Directors .qt t~~ir meeting held on the 27TH day of MarCh_#-i ¡eJ~ bert W. Tucker, Jr. crtetary - Treasurer COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 0~c/-?~ AGENDA TITLE: March 1995 Financial Report AGENDA DATE: May 3,1995 ITEM NUMBER: ;75: /~~'l INFORMATION: ACTION: SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: March 1995 Financial Report for the General and School Funds CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: X ATTACHMENTS: Yes STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Walters REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Attached is the March 31, 1995 Monthly Financial Report for the General and School Funds. Projected General Fund revenues were revised as of March 31. Total General Fund revenues are projected to exceed appropriations by $1,781,465, an increase of$363,521 1Tom the last revision. Local revenues are projected to exceed appropriations by $1,873,984. State and Federal revenues are projected to be ($71,202) and ($21,317) respectively less than appropriated. The local revenue projected increase is primarily due to additional anticipated property tax, sales tax, and interest collections. Projected General Fund expenditures have not been revised at this time, but will be updated in the April Financial Report.. Projected School revenues are based on the February School Financial Report. Projected School expenditures are based on the February School Financial Report. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance of the March 1995 Financial Report. 95MARRPT.WPD 95.063 n 'I 8 1995 ALBEMARLE COUNTY OPERATIONS MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT MARCH 31, 1995 PERCENT YTD/PROJ 75.99% 68.92% 53.56% 70.36% 9.07% 72.80% 51.37% 72.19% 76.40% 99.12% 76.82% 79.21 % 66.14% 65.40% 66.08% 70.85% CHANGE ,913,984 14,924 o (169,861: 8,683 ,767,730 $1 1 APPROPRIATED BUDGET $67,779,010 456,711 5,435,991 27,678,125 760,904 102,110,740 3,026,115 105.136.856 REVENUES LOCAL(GENERAL FUND LOCAL(SCHOOLS) SELF-SUSTAINING FUNDS STATE FEDERAL TOTAL REVENUES TRANSFERS IN TOTAL WITH TRANSFERS 25,272,911 4,549,280 8,288.380 38.110,571 EXPENSES GENERAL GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS NON-DEPARTMENTAL TRANSFERS SUBTOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 61,590,294 5,435,991 67,026.285 136.856 ~ 105 SCHOOL FUND OPERATIONS SELF-SUSTAINING FUNDS SUBTOTAL SCHOOL DIVISION BALANCE OF REVENUES OVER EXPENSES TOTAL EXPENSES ALBEMARLE COUNTY GENERAL FUND MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT MARCH 31, 1995 PERCENT YTD/PROJ 75.99% 66.50% 36.32% 75.22% 100.00% 75.73% 74.51 % 78.46% 79.64% 68.00% 77.88% 75.00% 73.23% 76.73% 99.12% 76.82% 77.14% ...·......py.Ø419$'i....· êaOJec'fED APPROPRIATED BUDGET $67,779,010 5,368,412 213.500 73,360,922 1,554,594 74,915.516 4,370,334 1 ,442,127 7,641,414 2,203,323 4,785,661 36,804,945 2,705,941 2,124,111 4,549,280 8,288.380 74.915,516 ···YEA·a···· .-'-.-.-. - -. - - ..:.:.:, TQ[)Äm PROJECTED CHANGE REVENUES LOCAL STATE FEDERAL TOTAL REVENUES TRANSFERS IN TOTAL WITH TRANSFERS GENERAL GOV'T ADMINISTRATION JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC SAFETY PUBLIC WORKS HUMAN DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION P ARKS/RECREA TION/CUL TURE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NONDEPARTMENTAL TRANSFERS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES EXPENSES ~ BALANCE OF REVENUES OVER EXPENSES ALBEMARLE COUNTY SCHOOL FUND MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT MARCH 31, 1995 PERCENT YTD/PROJ 68.92% 71.27% 0.00% 69.46% 72.12% 71 .11 % 64.84% 75.33% 70.28% 71 .77% 89.33% 50.95% 66.14% PROJECTED CHANGE APPROPRIATED BUDGET $456,711 22,309,713 54 7 .404 23,313,828 38,276,466 61.590,294 46,824,256 2,245,548 4,925,031 6,329,591 108,306 1,157.562 61,590,294 REVENUES LOCAL - STATE FEDERAL TOTAL REVENUES TRANSFERS IN TOTAL WITH TRANSFERS INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION, ATTENDANCE, HEALTH PUPIL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FACILITIES OPERATION/MAINTAINANCE FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION/MODIFICATION TRANSFERS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES SCHOOLS EXPENSES tq BALANCE OF REVENUES OVER EXPENSES -. ALBEMARLE COUNTY OPERATIONS FUND BALANCE REPORT MARCH 31, 1995 GENERAL SCHOOL CAPITAL FUND FUND FUND FUND BALANCE 06-30-94 $13,067,207 $1,197,700 $1,107,688 APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS: CURRENT YEAR OPERATIONS - BUDGETED (925,000) (798, 11 6) (682,920) REAPPROPRIA TIONS (305,923) UNEXPENDED SCHOOL SITE REAPPROPRIATION (181,432) REQUEST FROM CARRYOVER FUNDS (234,022) (110,802) MURRAY EDUCATION CENTER (35,000) GEORGETOWN ROAD (13,000) HEALTH DEPARTMENT NEW WING (15,000) SCHOOL BUSES (321,165) RT 250 LANDSCAPING REDUCTION 12,400 WAHS CROSSING NET SMALL PROJECT TRANSFERS 13,580 LIBRARY ROOF (45,000) LI BRARY HV AC (22,500) JUVENILE DETENTION HOME (7,148) GIFTED TEACHER POSITIONS (146,506) MID YEAR ADJUSTMENTS TO CIP PROJECTS 120,840 TOTAL APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS (1,554,594 126,054 016,066 FUND BALANCE 11.512.613 $71 .646 $91.622 ;. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ~*.9.s- AGENDA TITLE: 1994-95 Work Plan for the Co1.l1lt¥ Development Departments AGENDA DATE: f-ß- ,9::Ç ITEM NUMBER: ,??:¿:7.5?ß, ~p INFORMATION: ACI'lON: SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: Work activity scheduled and completed for FY 94-95 CONSENT AGENDA: X ACTION: INFORMATION: X STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, HutI: Cilimberg, Higgins, Hurt, McCulley ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: The 1994-95 Work Plan schedule for the Albemarle County Development Departments is an attempt to provide the relevant boards/commissions, development community and interested public with a comprehensive annual report docwnenting the many items which occupy the County Engineering, Inspection, Planning & Zoning Department's time and resources. This infonnationallisting is intended as a means of assessing and prioritizing the County's workload, and does not represent a mandated schedule. The work plan is broken into four easily identifiable categories: 1) the work item 2) the lead department & any supporting departments 3) the expected outcome/product and 4) the time schedule. This product is intended as a communications tool to the many "customers" that the County's Development Departments serve. To keep all interested parties informed and up to date, this work plan will be revised and made available yearly. The time ftames noted are estimates based on the latest obtainable infonnation and are subject to change as workloads and priorities shift. Staff is currently beginning the 1995-96 docwnent for the Planning Commission and Board's input prior to July I, 1995. DISCUSSION: This docwnent is provided for the Board's infonnation. It is the first effort to take a snapshot of work items as they currently are viewed through the end of the fiscal year. Staff intends to produce the 1995-96 docwnent for the Planning Commission and Board's discussion on priorities prior to the beginning of the next fiscal year. RECOMMENDATION: No action is needed as the workplan is provided for infonnation. Comments and suggestions would be welcomed. F; n 95.069 ~ ',~:;~ '7 !q95 " ~. ~~~o:~¿ \ ~ ~ l , -:·:·:·;·;::········<~~-~"B\'~" ............,':'$1',' , '" :.:{.:{{fMM\~ .....................~, ............................,.......,'1'\ ·.··..··········~···",I .............,....",1 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::~~~;~ :: ~ .....=:t ~ ::::~,;;:;;::~~1 ~\ t;:;UtW~· ] 994-95 WO PL) ~S FOR ALB MARLE C( Jì Y DEVE 0 [ENT DEPA NTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 1994-95 Work Plan schedule for the Albemarle County Development Departments is the first attempt to provide the development community and interested public with a comprehensive annual report documenting the many items which occupy the County Engineering, Inspection, Planning & Zoning Department's time and resources. This informational listing is intended as a means of assessing and prioritizing the County's workload, and does not represent a mandated schedule. The work plan is broken into four easily identifiable categories 1) the work item 2) the lead department & any supporting departments 3) the expected outcome/product and 4) the time schedule. This product is intended as a communication tool to the many "customers" that the County's Development Departments serve. To keep all interested parties informed and up to date, this work plan will be revised and made available yearly to all appropriate Boards, Commissions, staff and interested public. The time frames noted are estimates based on the latest obtainable information and are subject to change without prior notice as workloads and priorities shift. Please call the department listed below if you have any concerns or questions regarding a specific work item. Number 804-296-5861 804-296-5832 804-296-5823 804-296-5868 Phone Works Department Engineering & Public Inspections Planning Zoning Head J 0 Higgins Jesse Hurt Wayne Cilimberg Amelia McCulley Coun 1994-95. WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTS (revised 4/4/95) ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS -Grading Site Plan Zip/e Discussion with Planning Commission (PC) X X X X X X X X X + -Administrative Review Process P Status to PC for decision to codify X X X + -Policy P/z Review Ordinance and listing of priorities X X X X X X -Administrative lJp Review Ordinance and listing of priorities X X X X X X -Right to Fann P Reconunendation to PC for SP to By-right X X X X X X + -Accessory Housing Zip/i Develop procedure for approval and tracking X + -Noise Regulation & Code Amendment Zip Ordinance to PC in April/May, then on to adoption and X X X X X X X X X + X X implementation -Sign Ordinance Z Part I Ordinance Revisions to PC in June X X X X X -Home Occupation: Class B P Reconunendation to PC for Resolution of Intent X X X X X X -Housing Committee Reconunendations P Reconunendations following Camp Plan review X X X X X X X X X X X X -ACSA Mandatory Connection Policy P To follow policy adoption by ACSA Board ? +=product delivery Lower Case= Support Dept. E=Engineering, I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept 1994-95 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTS (revised 4/4/95) I I I I : ~ I . I l<:,$ ,. ø I '. ~ '. FIRE/SAFETY - - - - -Access Policy:> 50 lots P/ile Recommendation to PC for Resolution of Intent X X X X - - - - - - - - DEVELOPMENT DESIGN MANUAL E/plz Outline of Contents to PC X X X X X X + X - - - -Serious Driveways E/plz On hold as of 1/95 -- Additional requirements X X X X X + - - - -Tree Planting Specs Z Draft Manual X X (to Planning Commission in July) - - - - - - SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE P Compilation of revisions ongoing pending completion of X X X X X X X X X X X X recommendations to PC (follows work to be completed on Housing Committee recommendations, ACSA Mandatory Connection, Fire Ordinance, Serious Driveways, Consolidated Water Ordinance & Administrative Review) - - - - - - - - - - - - SITE REVIEW PROCESS ALL Internal process review to Red X X X X X X + IX X - - - - E=Engineering, I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept.. Lower Case= Support Dept., +=product delivery 2 (revised 4/4/95) - - _____m_ ~ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN -Scattered Site Meetings P Hold Meetings X X X X X -Economic Development Policy P Recommendation to PC X X X + -Growth Area Expansion P Recommendation to PC X X X + -Land Use Standards/Designate P Recommendation to PC X X + -Land Use Plan P Recommendation to PC for Public Meetings X + CATS UPDATE -Policy P Recommendation to MPO Policy X X + -Projects P Development for MPO approval late 1996 X X X X X X 1994-95 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTS 3 Lower Case= Support Dept.. +=product delivery E=Engineering, I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept. 1994-95 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTS (revised 4/4/95) ~-- CIP -Institute Process Changes PIe Institute changes X X + -FY95-96 Plan P Recommendations to PC X X + -FY96-97 Plan P Develop and administer process X X X X -CIP Requests E/p Develop, evaluate & submit for 96-97, including school X X projects NEIGHBORHOOD/AREA STUDIES -Crozet P Recommendation to PC X X X + -Milton Area B P Recommendation to PC X X + - Birdwood/F aulkner P Recommendation to PC X X X X X E911/BUlLDING LOCATOR P Institute building locator/implement E911 mapping X X X X X X X X X + DEVELOPMENTTRACK]NGSYSTEM P/ilzJe Continued development X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept.. Lower Case= Support Dept.. +=product delivery E=Engineering, 1994-95 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTS (revised 4/4/95) BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS -Streamline Permit Process Uz Increase productivity & permit issuance by 50010 X X X X X X X X X X X + -Building Permit Review Team Uz Implement new policies, procedures and training X X X X X X X X X X + X PUBLIC EDUCATION/CLIENT ALL Educate developers, builders & public by participating in X X X X X X X X X X X X FEEDBACK seminars, conferences, community/organizational meetings as well as providing materials for publication NOTICE/APPEAL CLARIFICATION ZJP Draft Amendments X X + 5 I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept.. Lower Case= Support Dept. +=product delivery E=Engineering, 1994-95 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTS (revised 4/4/95) ~ ~ II I e· . II " I APPLICATION REVIEW P/ilzle Meet review deadlines X X X X X X X X X X X X (Zoning Map Amendments, Special Use Permit Amendments, Site Development Plans, Subdivision Plats) - - - - -Accessory Tourist Lodging, Home Z Meet review deadlines X X X X X X X X X X X X Occupations, Sign Permits, Bus. Clearances - - - - PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITIES AUTHORITY - - - - -RPD Easement monitoring P Annual report to Authority X + - - - WATER RESOURCES COMMITIEE E/p Member participation X X X X X X X X X X X X - - - FISCAL IMPACT MODEL P Complete and incorporate in Comp Plan and Zoning Map X X X X X X X X X + X X Amendment Reviews - - - HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEYING P Assist state/consultants X X X X X X X X - - - - - - - - COMMITTEE PARTICIPATION - - - - -Program Review p Participation in budget committee X X + - - - - -Human Services Planning P Participation in staff committee X X X X X X - - - - -Housing P Assistance to committee and Housing Coordinator X X X X X X X X X X X X - - - - -PACC Tech PIe Participation in committee X X X X X X X X X X X X E=Engineering, I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept.. Lower Case= Support Dept., +=product delivery 6 1994-95 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTS (revised 4/4/95) OTHER TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS -MPO Technical committee PIe Member participation and project/administrative support X X X X X X X X X X X X - TSM/Functional Classification Study P Report to MPO X X X X X + X X X + -Six Year Road Plans P Recommendations to PC/BOS X X + X + -Meadow Creek Parkway Study PIe Revised traffic modeling and alignment report to PC X X X X X X X X X + DOCUMENTS -Development Activity Report P Annual Report X X X + -Building Report P Quarterly and Annual Reports + + + + + -lnfonnation Sheet P Annual Report X + -Annual Report Z Report to BOS X X + -CIP Financial Report E Mid and Year-end report to BOS X + X X + X X -lnfonnation Handouts for Applications Z Developing & distributing handouts for the public which X X X X X X X X X X X X explain application processes and necessary contact persons 7 Lower Case=Secondary Dept.. +=product delivery Letter=Lead Dept. E=Engineering, I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap 1994-95 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTS (revised 4/4/95) RECORDS MANAGEMENT -Centralized Filing lIP Installation of equipment and procedure implemented X X X X X X X X + -Ruling File System Z Review current files. Determine system (+) X Complete System next FY -Court Case File System Z Determine system. Complete next FY X -Establish Condition Tracking System Z Determine system. Implement next FY X (Violations, SP, etc.) -Development Code Index Z Update Development Code amendments X X -Land Use Matrix Z Update for ZT A X X + ILLEGAL DUMPING TASK FORCE E/z Recommendations to Board of Supervisors X X X X X X X + PLANTINGS ON ROUTE 250E Z Administer planting X X + 8 +=product delivery Lower Case=Secondary Dept. E=Engineering, I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept. 1994-95 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTS (revised 4/4/95) DRAINAGE CIP -Windham/Jannan Gap Channel II E Design X X (CIP Appropriation) -Four Seasons Basin E Dedicate & Design/Bid X X X X + X X (CIP Appropriation) - Woodbrook Channel E Acquire Easements X X X + (CIP Appropriation) -Peyton Basin E Dedicate X X X X X + X (CIP Appropriation) -Demonstration Watershed Project Grant E Pennitting Seminar X X X X X + X X X X -Lickinghole Retention Basin E Final Closeout X X X X X X X X X X X + (CIP Appropriation) 9 I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept.. Lower Case=Secondary Dept.. +=product delivery E=Engineering, 1994-95 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTS (revised 4/4/95) STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT E Moores Creek Program operational X X X X X X X X X + X X PLAN/STUDY CONSOLIDATED WATER E/p Focus Group Tasking defmed X X X X X X X X + X X X ORDINANCE METRIC SYSTEM TRANSITION E Implement deadlines X X X X X + BERKMAR DRIVE NORTH E Construction complete X X X X X X X X X X X + EXTENSION GREENWOOD SCHOOL EV ALVA TION E Recommendation on Disposal to County Executive X X X X X + X DISPOSAL STREETLIGHTS (planning Initiated E/p Revise policy & submit to BOS X X X + X Projects) COB RENOVATIONS E Renovations Complete X X X X X X X X X + QUAIL RUN/UREF E Commonwealth Transportation Board approval X X X + GEFANVC E To the BOS for resolution X X X X X + ENFORCEMENT/INSPECTIONS I/ZJE Ongoing review and training for inspection procedures X -Industrial Access E Approval and construction X X X X -Subdivision Road Acceptance E On-going field inspection X X X X X X X X X X X X -Site Approval Conditions Z Detennine compliance with specific site requirements X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 Lower Case=Secondary Dept.. +=product delivery P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept. I=Inspections, E=Engineering, 19940-95 WORK PLANS FOR ALBEMARLE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS DEPARTMENTS (revised 4/4/95) MISCELLANEOUS BOS, PC & PUBLIC INITIATED P/z As Required - - - - - - - - - - - - LITIGATION PREP ARA TION ALL As Required - - - - - - - - - - - - LEGISLATIVE MONITORING ALL As Required X X X X PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITIES AUTHORITY -Staffmg assistance P As Required - - - - - - - - - - - - ROAD ABANDONMENTSN ACA TIONS PIe As Required - - - - - - - - - - . - ACSA JURISDICTIONAL AREA P As Required - - - - - - - - - - - - AMENDMENTS AGRICULTURAUFORESTAL P As Required - - - - - - - - - - - - DISTRICT REVIEWS 11 I=Inspections, P=Planning, Z=Zoning, Cap. Letter=Lead Dept.. Lower Case=Secondary Dept.. +=product delivery E=Engineering, f' ... /-~~ç ,4---: tf?§t?::i s,fJ April 25, 1995 Route 250 West, Albemarle County Belair Entrance Task Force Mr. Ralph L. Feil P. O. Box 2057 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Mr. Feil: This is in reference to your letter dated March 31, 1995, regarding the most recent meeting of the Belair Task Force. It is important that the Department's views, as I presented at the last meeting, be clarified. The Department would support reclosure of the off ramp only if the statistics regarding this issue supported same for reasons of safety. I will be contacting you or Mr. John Greene in the immediate future to relay the Department's interpretation of the traffic data collected from early 1994 to present regarding the Route 250 bypass off ramp. The Department feels that the off ramp should remain open and that a modification to the lanes of this off ramp be made as shown on the attached sketch. We will review the numbers with you at your request but would like to note that the accident rates have dropped significantly and, therefore, support the above resolution of this issue. The detailed history of the Route 250 west Belair entrance was proposed for purposes of advising the Board of Supervisors the background of these issues. After discussion with the two local board representatives, a detailed history does not appear necessary. The important information at this time is the task force issue yet to be resolved, i.e. the Route 250 bypass off ramp. Should the task force disagree with the Department's proposal for modifying this off ramp, it is requested that alternate plans be submitted to the Board of Supervisors for review and support. The Department will act accordingly on behalf of public safety. Long-term improvements to the Belair location will be considered in the near future. The Department and the Board of Supervisors have requested primary funding for the study of the Route 250 west corridor from the city limits west to Ivy. A study of this corridor should determine what improvements are needed in order to enhance safety and traffic flow. Current and future development will also impact the improvements needed along this section of Route 250. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter. Sincerely, A. G. Tucker AGT/smk attachment cc: Mr. H. O. Davidson, Mr. D. R. Askew Mr. J. S. Hores, Ms. Ella Carey .... *' (0- ~ (l) 0 ü tf) 0 ¡- c 0 0 -+-' Z C U 0 Q) tf) -+-' C- O Q) ~ U -+-' 0 C - Q) 0:::: 0 LD ...0 N C- :::; - - U Q) u... -+-' 0:::: c a... U 0 E Q) ...... 0 tf) IQ) 0 a::: u 0 0 0... - .-J 0 lL. - ..D C- '-- 0...- :::I 0... U E -0 0 CL> 0:::: (/) Û 0 a... 0 '-- u 0... CD!> o --.-J f- tf) fCD ./ Þ¡¡;¡¡ .....s- ¡;¡ ·j¡¡¡;¡ü 'I..¡I..¡ <.:I ~¡;...-'¡s ( -............ oJ. ~ ~O~~AU3EMARWlË (í MAY 1 1995 JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR !b~:J~il:f~1£"ïJ . 2300 Commonwealth Drive. Suiteß........I:.Al;Ç{lTIVE OFFICE Ch ·11 V· .. p ríV P n 'í1n r~ arlottesvl e. lrgtn13 \ ';, 'rî Is U IV!;' 22901 800-277-5222 804-978-3644 FAX 804-978-3643 I 1995 , Your Agency on Aging Serving the Citizens of Charlottesville, Albemarle, Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa and Nelson , d' _¿.¿:~t</ MEMORANDUM TO: Local Elected Officials \ " Gordon Walke:t ( , Annual Report /.~) ,,1 1..... ; \ ,,- ; <.---~......,","" . .. .... _'i'~" "" FROM: RE: DATE: April 26, 1995 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ I am pleased to share with you JABA's Annual Report. During 1994, we were able to provide services to 7716 persons in the Planning District Ten. We expect to continue this high level of service in 1995, as we work with you to make our communities a better place for all of us who are aging. Celebrating 19 Years of Community Service to the Elderly and Their Families · AdulI Healthcare · Case Management · Geriatric ConsulIation · Homebound Meals · Home Care · Home Safety/Repair' Inf()fmation and Referral' Legal' Ombudsman · Outreach · Personal Care · Senior Community Centers · Senior Employment · Telephone Reassurance' Transportation' Volunteer Programs Board . glng 1994 ANNUAL REPORT A Word from the Chair As measured by examples, highlights, and supporting data presented in this report, 1994 was a productive year for JABA. It also was a year in which we became increasingly aware that the tradi- tional funding sources on which we have depended (federal, state and local) have leveled and are not likely to meet the challenges in the increases in need that are sure to mark the years just ahead. On the other side of the cost ledger, we know that people are living longer. When Social Security was initiated in 1935, only half of all white American males lived long enough to collect at 65! In contrast, the white male child born in 1994 has a life expectancy of over 76 years! In our last 19 years of operation, we have been able to respond to the growing needs in the five counties and city of Charlottesville. Looking to the future, however, there seems little chance that we will be able to meet even the urgent needs as the funding stays almost level, while needs escalate. We are on the leading edge of a major surge in the numbers who will be calling for sup- port. Those "baby boomers" born in 1946 will begin a dramatic "age quake" as they enter retire- ment and call for increased services of many kinds for their parents and themselves. In 1994, JABA initiated a planning and action process to provide funds for the emerging unprecedented demands on our services. Specifi- cally, we undertook planning in our Development Office to assure that our entire community is aware of the opportunity to invest through business and personal contributions in the well-being of our present and future older citizens. We also orga- nized a separate corporate entity called Jefferson ElderCare, which will engage in appropriate enter- prises designed to extend our charitable capacity and expand service accessibility. In order to offer the elderly in our community the services they need and deserve, we shall turn more and more to entre- preneurial activity. In this way, the efforts of our many volunteers will be continued as a first line response. Ed Jones, Chair JABA OUTREACH Seminars, workshops and public meetings are some ways JABA spreads information about aging concerns. These included: "How to Get Long-term Care Without Going Broke," "Caring for the Elderly," "Attracting the 50 Plus Market," anq public hearings on local concerns. In addition, volunteers and professionals visited a variety of church and civic organizations and explained medi- cal insurance options and other services that JABA provides. Publications included: "A Guide to Retire- ment Living," the first brochure in Region 10 for retirees considering a move here; "Silver Linings," a bi-monthly news magazine on aging concerns published by the Daily Progress with a distribution of 14,000 issues at newsstands, through the mail, and in the Progress. Infomercials on aging by Gordon Walker were aired on radio and television. He also wrote columns for weekly newspapers. CASE MANAGEMENT Case managers keep their fingers on the collective pulse of the aged in our communities. Often, they have to overcome indifference and cynicism. They need to be advocates, sometimes arguing that utility companies turn on electricity for an ailing person who has not paid a bill, or with health providers to approve needed services. They coordinate services with other agencies, like Alzheimer's support groups, fuel assistance pro- grams, local departments of social service, housing and mental health, hospitals, Meals on Wheels, and other service providers. Our case managers are pa- tient, determined and successful. SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTERS Two news senior community centers -- at Gladstone and at Rockfish -- were added in Nelson County. Now there are nine JABA centers in Planning District 10. Most centers are experienc- ing problems because of their success -- they are running out of room and need better facilities. What makes them so successful? New friendships, good food, activities from games to parties, lec- tures and workshops on legal, financial and medical issues, field trips and much more. HIGHLIGHTS OF 1994 SENIOR EMPLOYMENT The Older Workers Program which links seniors looking for work with employers who want dependable workers, placed 65 percent of its train- ees at an average wage of $7.96 hourly. One for- mer factory worker earned her GED, was trained in computer wordprocessing and now works for a lawyer. Another client needed to overcome lan- guage and health difficulties as well as the fact that she had never been employed. She graduated from CA TECH and received her state license to be a nail technician. HOMEBOUND MEALS JABA renewed its contract with Meals on Wheels to distribute 5,500 hot nutritious meals in Charlottesville and parts of Albemarle County. The need for home-delivered meals is becoming increasingly urgent as hospltals release elderly patients earlier and earlier to recover at home. The importance of the volunteers who deliver meals is not only because of the food they bring; they also provide the social interaction so necessary for emotional well-being. HOME CARE Aides are frequently called by their clien- tele "jewels" and "rays of light." They enable the elderly to remain at home, reasonably independent, by providing for needs such as personal care, cook- ing, cleaning, laundering, carrying groceries. About 85 full- and part -time aides serve an average of 125 people a month. OMBUDSMAN Rosemary Hayes, one of only two certified volunteer investigative ombudsmen in Virginia, returned to JABA in September after a long hiatus. Eight volunteers each spend four hours a week visiting nursing homes where they focus on patients who do not have family members to advocate for them. Their aim is to find solutions to small prob- lems before they become major (like the patient who complained of being hungry because of the meal portions and therefore received larger meals) and to befriend the patients, themselves. VOLUNTEER PROGRAMS In the past year, 316 JABA and RSVP volunteers helped 7850 people in 117 programs and agencies, ranging from the Alcoholism Council to YMCA. In April, about 300 people, from 20 months to 94 years of age, were honored at a Volunteer Recognition Luncheon at the Omni. TRANSPORTATION Thanks to the rides provided by volun- teers, JAUNT and Greene County Transit, many people were able to get to places that were essential for them -- to medical appointments, grocery stores, to senior community centers. These volun- teers also transported meals to homebound clients. LEGAL AID JABA signed a contract with Charlottes- ville Legal Aid to address legal concerns of the elderly and to regularly give tips at senior com- munity centers. INFORMATION & REFERRAL Over 20 people a day come to the JABA main office or call its I&R line. Responses range from answers over the telephone to personal con- sultations to packets of literature sent through the mail. The office stacks hundreds of pamphlets, folders and brochures -- from assistive technology to consumer fraud to insurance information to writing a will. But We Couldn't Help Everyone As hard as we try, we still got requests to do more. At the end of the fiscal year, case man- agers in every community reported people who did not qualify for personal or skilled care through a home health agency but were still in need of them. There were also waiting lists for Home Delivered Meals in every county. Senior community centers, with their social and educational programs, were becoming so successful they were running out of space and needed facilities that were better suited for them. And despite the fact that so many volun- teers do so much, there was a call for for them to do more still -- to provide transportation, to deliver meals, to bring warmth and caring to those in need. As our tables indicate, during 1994 many were served. What they do not say is there were many who were still waiting. Those numbers -- of those who need and those who wait -- continues to grow. SERVICE TO EACH AND ALL JABA's goal is to help ALL people with aging concerns. That means the younger generation, too, who seek help in taking care of older family members in a variety of ways - - from advice on care planning to help with food, health care, transportation and housing. While the statistics do relate the numbers of people served, it is the stories of the individuals who are served that emphasize the importance of what we do. Here are some of their stories. ALBEMARLE An elderly widower in early stages of Alzheimer's refused to move in with his children. He also refused housekeeping assistance. But he did accept cold food snacks from JABA, a necessity since he could no longer operate his oven. Through an ingenious solution by the case manager, a neighbor now heats his frozen meals in the evening so he could obtain better nourishment and the man, instead of being totally alone, enjoys the neighbor's daily visits. CHARLOTTESVILLE A concerned neighbor called JABA during the summer because the power company turned off the electricity of an 82-year-old woman who had forgotten to pay bill. The potential danger was that because of medical problems she had to stay cool. The case manager contacted her doctor who explained to the power compa- ny the danger she was in. The utility company did restore power and the neigh- bor is helping her pay her bills. FLUV ANNA A 48-year-old man, unable to speak and with weakness in his left arm and leg as the result of a stroke, receives physical and speech therapy at the Thomas Jeffer- son Adult Healthcare Center. After the stroke, he had moved in with his daughter's family. Without the care he receives at TJAHC, a member of that family would have had to quit work to take care of him. Because of the care he got at TJAHC, they went to their jobs, knowing he is getting the care he needs. GREENE An 81-year-old man with Alzheimer's once caused a fire in his home when he was left alone. Now he is trans- ported to TJAHC twice a week, and his wife has respite so that she can do errands, see friends, and rest from continual caring. Without TJAHC's care, he would have been institutionalized. LomSA A 42-year-old mentally and physi- cally disabled woman in Cobham, who once couldn't move because of her infirmi- ties, can now go almost anywhere in her home, thanks to assistive technology devic- es installed in the home by the Home Safe- ty Program. Installed were bathroom safety modifications and equipment and a grab bar to help the client move between the bathroom and hall. NELSON A fiercely-independent 86-year-old widow on a fixed income wanted to con- tinue living in her own home. However, arthritis and an inoperable back condition prevent her from lifting heavy objects or performing many household chores. Her Home Care aide, who the woman de- scribes as "a ray of sunshine" cooks, cleans, launders and carries her groceries. JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING Dedicated to helping ALL people with aging concerns, the Jefferson Area Board for Aging (JABA) serves residents of all ages in the city of Charlottesville and the counties of Albemarle, Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa and Nelson. As one of 25 area Agencies on Aging in Virginia initiated by the Older American's Act, JABA's purpose is to bring programs, services and information to its populace. Among its array of services are several programs supportive of the elderly who wish to remain at home in safety and with dignity as long as possible. Branch offices, staffed by case managers who help older adults, families and friends find the best resources to fill their needs are located in each community. Nine senior community centers fulfill other needs of older citizens, including nurtritiòn, education and having a good time. JABA PROGRAMS Case Management Homebound Meals Home Care Information and Referral Legal Ombudsman Personal Care Senior Community Centers Senior Employment Transportation Volunteer Programs Programs People Served Amount Spent Case Management 782 229,506 Homebound Meals 508 264,251 Home Care 101 338,860 Information & Referral 1067 64,533 Legal 89 6,051 Ombudsman 804 14,836 Personal Care 75 642,153 Senior Community Center 395 218,260 Senior Employment 23 94,520 Transportation 117 78,440 Volunteer Programs 7716 223,147 Total 2,174,557 Note: Figures have been aligned to reflect uniform service classifications. The programs are supported by the following revenue sources: federal 36%, state 47%, local government 12% non-government (client contributions, grants, etc.) 5%. JABA, INC. HIGHLIGHTS OF 1994 OUTREACH For its outstanding service to the commu- nity, JABA, Inc. was awarded a Gold Award from United Way. "The JABA REPORT," a quarterly newsletter for about 3800 friends and donors, made its initial appearance. INFORMATION AND REFERRAL Virginia Assistive Technology System enlarged its staff to two part-time and one full-time program manager. Staff members met with repre- sentatives of the Disability Services Board to dis- cuss coordination of services and the new regional office at UVa of the Parkinson's Association of America. They also talked with the new commis- sioner of the UVa Department of Rehabilitation on the importance of assistive technology in long-term care and independent living. ADULT HEAL THCARE At the Thomas Jefferson Adult Healthcare Center, UVa medical students, in conjunction with Family Practice, learned about adults with special needs and participated in client interaction. Tan- dem School in its intergenerational action sent five students to the center each week. United Way funding enabled TJAHC the ability too provide care for younger people -- those under 60 -- who needed oversight and rehabilitative services; 17 rural cli- ents received United Way scholarships. HOME SAFETY This program continued to be in demand beyond its capacity to meet needs; 69 people in all counties were on waiting lists. In the Home Safety Program, indoor and outdoor ramps, handrails, bathroom equipment and childproof doorknobs to prevent "wandering" were installed. COOL-AID During the hot summer months, air-condi- tioners and fans were provided for those who were in medical danger from the heat. Thanks to funding from Martha Jefferson Hospital, Cool-aid expanded to include disabled non-elderly and children. VOLUNTEERS Volunteers from JABA and RSVP were on hand for a Cool-Aid fundraiser and a Charity Fair, both held at the Barracks Road Shopping Center. They participated in the Senior Showcase at the Senior Center and the Greene County Fair. TRANSPORTATION Thanks to United Way, 32 clients were driven to TJAHC. The range of clients were from a 32-year-old retarded woman from Albemarle to a 81-year-old man with Alzheimer's from Greene. HOME REPAIR About 85 people received reliable home repair services at reasonable rates. Home repair replaced a defective hard-wired smoke detector in one home and repaired a porch ceiling that had collapsed in another. HOME/PERSONAL CARE Twenty-three people received 1546 hours of care thanks to United Way. That assistance provided clients with aides who helped them with daily living so they could continue to live indepen- dently in their homes. DEVELOPMENT More than 900 caring individuals, busi- nesses and civic organizations gave JABA, Inc. $135,000. We also received 114 non-cash items, including wheelchairs, walkers, bathroom safety equipment, air conditioners and food for the holi- days. Special thanks go to: Shirley Ehrhardt, owner of Twice is Nice Thrift Shop, who increased her contribution to JABA; Albemarle Children's Theatre, which showed intergenerational interest by giving JABA its box office receipts; Reynolds Metals Company, whose grant helped provide meals to the homebound elderly; Robert Van Winkle of WVIR with radio stations WINA and WCHV, who presented a media event complete with prizes at the Barracks Road Shop- ping Center. The result was cool cash for Cool- Aid and a resulting safe summer for seniors, the disabled and frail children in jeopardy from danger- ous heat. 1994 also saw the completion of a feasibil- ity study on a new adult healthcare center. After a strong vote of confidence from 100 community leaders, we began plans for a capital campaign to raise funds for the new facility. JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING, INe. In 1975, the six jurisdictions in Planning District Ten signed a joint exercise of power agreement by which JABA was created to administer federal and state programs for the elderly. In 1986, JABA's Board of Directors decided to form a complementary organization, Jefferson Area Board for Aging, Inc. The creation of this new entity enables the Board to seek non-public funding sources, develop innovative programming and minimize duplication of administrative services, thus controlling scarce resources while providing more services. Also serving the elderly and those who care for them in Charlottesville and the five surrounding counties, the Jefferson Area Board for Agin.g, Inc. obtains the fiùlest extent of public and private support for problems that accompany aging and places a high priority on promoting wellness. JABA, Inc. is in the central office of the Jefferson Area Board for Aging in Charlottesville, and can also be reached through branch offices in Albemarle, Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa and Nelson counties. JABA, INC. PROGRAMS Adult Health Care Geriatric Consultation Home Care Home Safet)'/Repair Information and Referral Transportation Volunteer Programs Development Programs People Served Amount Adult Health Care 89 255,857 Geriatric Consultation 495 47,928 Home Care 42 80,928 Home Safety/Home Repair 750 68,205 Information & Referral 100 30,577 Transportation 66 9,950 Volunteer Programs 134 6,770 Development Not Applicable 54,372 Capital Campaign Not Applicable 36,510 Total 591,097 Note: Programs are supported by the following revenue sources: state 10%, local government 21 %, non-government (gifts, grants, United Way, etc.) 69%. ,.. .... ~. .-'-.-..----,----.--..----..----. r~ (;) ¡ï; n qn , ' '1 :~1 ....,U-..,"_~.~-~""-~;~. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA MAY" 2 I9æ DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601·0RANGE ROAD CULPEPER, 22701-3819 I !o.....-...=.__.,~.._____.: _:;, [) OF S, r. .I.' (;;'-,:: ::>t ... . B8NALD.R. ASKEW DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR I)' . " ; '" . ¿:. -5¿- ¿:' . ¡~:tnt-U!f;O Of") ~'ft""'¡1' -J-- - --7. . _.~ ~..,t.1'\_. ......,._",...t'........... _""~,.,..__ April 25, 1995 proj: 6029-967-F01,PE-100 Desc: U.S. 29 Corridor Development Study Counties of Albemarle, Greene, Orange, Madison, Culpeper, Rappahannock and Fauquier Towns of Culpeper, Orange, Madison, Remington, Warren ton, and City of Charlottesville Agend.: itEm t:J __..___.__.... Members Albemarle Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 Dear Board Member: citizen Information Meetings will be held for the subject project on Wednesday, May 10, 1995 between 4:30 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. at the Culpeper Middle School, located at 14300 Achievement Drive in Culpeper, and on Thursday, May 11, 1995 between 4:30 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. at the Madison County High School, Route 29 South, in Madison. The purpose of these meetings is to introduce this project to local citizens and interested parties. The 29 Corridor Development Study is a major undertaking that will help plan for the future transportation facilities, including rail, air and automobile travel for people and freight. Attached is a copy of the public announcement regarding the meetings. Sincerely, J)/ /Ji 1L~-,~·I/·i / L1,'\.----"~..L,. --- v r R. H. Connock, Jr., P.E. District Construction Engineer RHC:lcs Attachment TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY 1'!">.' .I ..·.··--:..O:-:·.:.:·x-:·:-:·:- x.····..:·:. . .y:...:-::::::........«~ :.ox·:.. e gimes --- -- -- 1NU1.,,,".'i,,,, """, Di.e...," II Citizen Information / Participation Meeting ----------------------- u. s. 29 Corridor Developmeni Study Charlottesville to Warrenton Wednesday, May 10,1995 Between 4:30pm and 7:00pm Culpeper Middle School 14300 Achievement Drive(off Route 229) approximately one half mile north of the North Corporate Limits of Culpeper · · · · · · · Thursday, May 11,1995 Between 4:30 pm and 7:00 pm Madison County High School Route 29 south in the Town of Madison PuTDose: To introduce this project to local citizens and interested parties. Improvements to transportationfacilities within the corridor will be developed to meetfuture travel demands. The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficeincy Act of 1991 (ISTEA), identified U. S. 29 as a high priority transportation corridor. This study is a major undertaking that will help plan for the future transportation facilities, including rail, air and automobile travel for peopole and freight. Ooen Forum: There will be no formal presentation, however you will be afforded the opportunity to make both oral and written commentsfor the official record. There will be a continual audioMsual presentation shown which will explain the proposed project. Written Statements: Written statements and other exhibits relative to the proposed project may also be submitted to the Department at any time within 10 days after the hearing. SDecial Assistance: If you require special assistance to attend and participate in this meeting or need additional information contact: D. R. Askew (Culpeper District Administrator): 703-829-7500 ,...... VI...... ...........t .'Tn..po........ Device for the Hearing Impaired (TDD): 1-800-307-4630 Project: 6029-967-FOl,PE-JOO WARRENTON r^~ RAPPAHANNOCK7 /" /: / MADISON /\ \ CULPEPER '~ ./ \ <...1'- ,,,,- GREENE \ ( J / .... (J1 ORANGE CHARLOTTESVILLE m NORTH NOT TO SCALE STATE PROJECT: 6029-967-F01, PE-100 FEDERAL PROJECT: DPS-D37-2 (120) u.s. 29 CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT STUDY ~.., V. A c;¡ . N . A.. DE P A.. A.....IVI EN..... C> F ..... A A.. N S P C> A..... A.. ...... C> N 2 ;995 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION POBOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902·2013 {) r~'H¿.::2~-~SI~~N~~~~~~R ¡ ~.~:' rn f': :j.,_...,,-,~_,_.___.",.,o>,~, May 1, 1995 Route 691, Albemarle County Between Routes 636 & 635 Ms. Ella Carey Albemarle County Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA. 22902 Dear Ms. Carey: Route 691 between Route 636 and Route 635 will be closed to through traffic from Monday, May 8, through Friday, May 12, 1995. The Virginia Department of Transportation intends to replace a large diameter drainage pipe under a section of the road. The work zone is approximately one-half mile south of Route 636 and approximately one and one-half miles north of route 635. The work area is located southwest of Batesville. Detours for residents living east of the work zone is Route 635 to Batesville north or Nelson County south. For those living west of the work zone the detour is Route 636 north to Batesville or south to Nelson County. Should you have any questions, please call this office. JHS/ldw Sin~ere . , jJ- . /~ - () 1! . Shif~r. Maint. Oper. Mgr. Attachments cc: Mr. D. R. Askew Mr. Bob Tucker, Bd. of Super. Crozet Fire Department, Sch. Trans. Dept. Ch'ville. Post Office, Alb. Co. Schools County Police, State Police S. C. Dean, Yancey Mills HQ TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY ..I '", COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA)~...__E:... DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PO. BOX 2013 CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902-2013 ,,\ t::~d 1~} 5~:3-ß~ ---.----~. TUCKER RESIDENT ENGINEER May 1, 1995 rj'~r r ~J- " ,J. ___._~ _..~ ',__ __ ~',...'. ~..;;.,_,_. .__.~_.'.__ Current Projects Construction Schedule Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk Board of Supervisors County Office Building 401 McIntire Road Charlotte~e, VA 22902 Dear Ms. Carey: Attached find the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently under construction in Albemarle County. Please see that this information is forwarded to the Board of Supervisors members. I will be prepared to discuss this matter with them at the next meeting if they desire. Yours Truly, A. G. Tucker ggu\ cc: Mr. R W. Tucker, Jr. w/attachment Mr. David Benish w/attachment TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ~ ,/ -. Projects Under Construction Albemarle County May 1, 1995 Route Location I Status i Estimated I , No. Compo Date ! ! ¡ From Hydraulic Rd. (Rte. 743) Construction 73% Complete 29 Dec 95 I To N. of Rio Road (route 631) I I ¡ I I Construction Started May 95 ! 240 I Route 240 Bridge Replacement Dec 95 I "'... I Near int. Route 250 I I I I I I ! ¡ I I I 1-64 I Bridge Repair - Various Locations Construction Started April 95 I Sep 95 I I i i ** ¡ I I i I i I I I I I I i I ! I I I ¡ , ! I I I I I I I I I I i i -1...-_____~ i I I I I I i I , i I , I I , i I ì i I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I i I * Revised Date ** New Project COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE MAY 3 ØI) 'I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ~...,..,- ...- .".....- ,.-\ ,,__,..-_.__kf._,.'C AGENDA TITLE: Charlottesville Transit Service(CTS) - Changes to Whitewood Road! Albert Court bus stop on Route 9. AGENDA DATE: May 3,1995 ITEM NUMBER: ACfION: X INFORMATION: SUBJECfIPROPOSAL/REOUEST: Review replacement of the Albert Court bus stop with a Colonnades and Old Salem Apartments bus stop. CONSENT AGENDA: ACfION: INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF CONTACf(S): Messrs. Tucker,Cilimberg,Wade REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: On January 4, 1995, the BOS approved the replacement of the Albert Court bus stop at The Colonnades and Old Salem apartments along with two other changes to Route 9. On April 5, 1995, the BOS revisited this issue and requested staff provide information on adding The Colonnades/Old Salem while keeping the Albert Court stop. This report is provided in response to the April 5, 1995 meeting regarding the changes in bus service. DISCUSSION: CTS has provided the attached information (Attahment A) on why they would not recommend adding The Colonnades/Old Salem bus service and at the same time continue the Albert Court stop on Route 9. In summary, CTS indicates that they would not be able to accommodate these Route 9 service provisions within acceptable time constraints and retain desired reliability. RECOMMENDATION: Staff continues to recommend the addition of The Colonnade/Old Salem bus stop and eliminating the Albert Court bus stop. MAP.WP 95.062 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CHARLOTTESVILLE TRANSIT MEMO To: Juandiego Wade, Albemarle County Planning Helen Poore, CTS May 2,1995 r¡) From: Date: Subject: Route 9 - Changes I understand that the Board of Supervisors has asked if it would be possible to provide bus service to both the Colonnades and Albert Court via CTS Route 9. While one might look at the distance between the intersection of CommonwealthlWhitewood and Albert Court and surmise that "it would only take two or three minutes" and should, therefore. fit into the bus schedule. This is not the case. Route 9 is already the longest CTS route. (See Attachment I) Like most other CTS routes, 9 is designed for a one hour headway. In constructing routes, consideration must be given to both moderate and heavy traffic conditions. In general, drivers must be able to complete routes with very brief "layovers" during light to moderate traffic, but still stay on schedule during heavy traffic. The average system speed for CTS buses is 12.7 miles per hour, which allows time for traffic delays and servicing passenger stops. This average speed is reflective of guidelines for transit systems in areas with similar characteristics. Route 9 currently exceeds the average system speed by 2.3 m.p.h. and it is already difficult to keep to the schedule during the peak commuter hours. It is often necessary to have another bus collect passengers on a short section of the route which overlaps with 9, or to have a car or van pick-up passengers needing to transfer to other routes. Adding the Colonnades segment, without dropping Albert Court, would result in the bus steadily becoming later on each round. At CTS, as with any bus system, reliability is key to being able to attract and retain riders. If we do not adhere to the printed schedule, it is likely that we will experience significant loss of ridership. . Creating a schedule problem on Route 9 would also affect other routes in the bus system. Many passengers transfer from Route 9 to other CTS routes. These transfers must be closely timed. A late arriving Route 9 would either cause another route to hold up to wait for a passenger, or would require the passenger to wait a full hour to transfer to the other bus. The first option would cause other buses to be late; the second option would deter people rrom using the system. I hope that the above information will be helpful to the Board in understanding why we are not able to add the Colonnades service, without curtailing service in another area. Please call me if you have any questions. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Y~?J AGENDA TITLE: Charlottesville Transit Service (CTS) - Changes to Whitewood Road! Albert Court bus stop on Route 9. AGENDA DATE: April 5, 1995 ACfION: X ITEM NUMBER: :{~~¡::~ INFORMATION(' SUBJECf/PROPOSALIREOUEST: Review replacement of the Albert Court bus stop with a Colonnades and Old Salem Apartments bus stop. -- STAFF CONTACflS): Messrs. Tucker, Cilimberg, Wade !¿J -ili1j?S- A1-.k~ ~".lß"ßUDI: INFORMATION: BACKGROUND: On January 4, 1995, the BOS approved the replacement of the Albert Court bus stop with a new bus stop at The Colonnades and Old Salem Apartments along with two other changes to Route 9 (see Attachment A). The purpose of these changes would be to better meet ridership demand without adversely affecting existing ridership or increasing the cost to the County. This report is provided in response to concerns expressed at the budget public hearing regarding the change in bus service. DISCUSSION: The Albert Court bus stop has served the Whitewood Road Village, Oak Forest, and Camelia Garden residential areas. It has experienced limited ridership averaging 10-12 riders per day. The riders who have caught the bus at the Albert Court location can still have access to CTS after the change by walking two blocks to the stop in ITont ofDMV on Commonwealth Drive. Adding the Colonnades stop is intended to help reduce the demand for service ITom JAUNT, which is more costly to provide than CTS service. The cost of JAUNT service to the Colonnades in FY 1993-94 was estimated to be approximately $18,000. Staff and CTS conducted a survey with The Colonnades and Old Salem Apartments to detennine if the residents would use the proposed bus service. Staff delivered 300 surveys to Old Salem, 33 (11%) of which were returned; 81 out of 220 (37%) ITom The Colonnades were returned. The results of the survey show that if service was provided to Old Salem, 94% of the residents that returned the survey would use it, and 81 % of The Colonnades residents would do the same. The results of the full survey can be found with Attachment A. Due to CfS bus schedule printing timetable, these changes to Route 9 are not expected to take place until late August, 1995. RECOMMENDATION: Staff continues to recommend this proposed change in bus service in Albemarle County. . ._,..... /'~ G .. 11. . Il. .11. . .'.'.~: '~~ ..,LL" ~_\,~!~~~. ¡ .~~ "'1AP 991i COLONNAD.WP 95.043 'ATTACHMENT AI COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA TITLE: Charlottesville Transit Service (CTS) Proposed Changes to Route 9 AGENDA DATE: January 4, 1995 ITEM NUMßER: ACTION: INFORMA TION: SUBJECTfPROPOSALIREQUEST: Request Board Approval to Initiate Three Changes to CTS Route 9 for Albemarle County Residents. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMATION: STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Wade, Benish ATTACHMENTs:;&ú:yeS r-- REVIEWED ßV: '/ BACKGROUND: In order to provide cost efficient service to Albemarle County. CTS has proposed three changes to Route 9. These changes will increase ridership without increasing the cost to the County. DISCUSSION: CTS and staff are proposing the following changes: 1. Remove Albert Court from Route 9 and add the Colonnades and Old Salem Apartments. The Albert Court stop serves the Whitewood Road Village. Oak Forest. and Camelia Garden residential areas. II has experienced limited ridership averaging 10-12 riders per day. The riders who presently catch the bus at the Albert COlu110calÍon will still have access to CTS by walking two blocks to the stop in front of DMV on CommonwealLh Drive. Adding the Colonnades stop may help reduce the demand for service from JAUNT. which is more cosily to provide than CTS service. The cost of JAUNT service to the Colonnades in FY 1993-94 was estimated to be approximately $18,000. Staff and CTS conducted a survey with The Colonnades and Old Salem Apal1ment tl? detennine if the residents would use the proposed bus service. Staff delivered 300 surveys to Old Salem, 33 (I 1%) of which were returned; 81 out of220 (37%) fi-om The Colonnades were returned. The results of the survey show that if service was provided to Old Salem 94% of the residents that returned the survey would use it. and 8 I % of the Colonnade residents would do the same. The results of the full survey are attached. NO COST 2. Remove the south leg ofBerkmar Road (Route 1403) between Rio Road and. Route 29 from Route 9. The riders who presently catch the bus on this leg of Berkmar Drive will still have access to CTS by walking. at the most, to the stop at the intersection of Rio Road and Berkmar Drive. See map for new bus route. NO COST 3. Pennission to locate a bus shelter at the intersection of Commonwealth Drive and Peyton Drive (south bound). NO COST RECOMMEND A TION: Staff recommends approval of I. 2, and 3 of CTS's proposed changes to bus service in Albemarle County. These changes will more efficiently serve the residents of the county. ' i:\g\s\CTSBUD.wp 94.204 c: Helen Poore , I SURVEY RESULTS The Colonnades I. Are you familiar with the Charlottesville Service? yes 45 (55.6 %) no 36 (44.4 %) 2. ffCTS service is provided to The Colonnades, would you use the bus? yes 69 (8].2 %) no 16 (18.8 %) 3. How often would you like to see the bus come to the Colonnades? 60 Minutes 34 (53.] %) 90 Minutes 18(28.]%) ] 20 Minutes ]2 (18.8 %) 4. Where would you like the bus to take you? Downtown Area 57 (16.3 %) Senior Center 30 (8.6 %) Rio Hill Shopping Center 24 (6.9 %) Fashion Square/Albemarle Square 54 (15.4 %) Seminole Square 29 (8.3 %) Kmart 29 (8.3 %) Barracks Road Shopping Center 54 (15.4 %) University of Virginia Hospital 47 (13.4 %). Martha Jefferson Hospital 26 (7.4 %) S. o you require a wheelchair accessible vehicle? yes 6 (8.2 %) 67 (91.8 %) no 6. I !ow many times a week do you leave The Colonnades to make trips to Charlottesville or along the 29 N<:>rth corridor Monday through Saturday from 6:30 AM to 6:30 PM? 0 3 (3.7 %) 1-4 54 (65.9 %) 5-8 19 (23.2 %) 8 or more 6 (7.3 %) 7. How do you make these trips? Drive yourself 56 (40.3 %) Ride with friends of family 32 (23.0 %) Colonnade van 23 (16.5 %) JAUNT 15(10.8%) CTS I (0.7 %) Taxi 12 (8.6 %) SURVEY RESULTS Old Salem I. Are you làmiliar with the Charlottesville Transit Service? Yes 29 (87.9 %) No 4 (12.1 %) 2. ffCTS provides service to Old Salem Apartments would you use the bus?· Yes 31 (93.9 %) No 2 (6.1 %) 3. How often would you like to see the bus come to Ihe Colonnades? 60 Minutes 28 (90.3 %) 90 Minutes 2 (6.5 %) 120 Minutes 1 (3.2 %) 4. Where would you like the bus to take you? Downtown Area 19 (14.4 %) Rio Hill Shopping Center 17(12.9%) Fashion Square/Albemarle Square 19 (14.4 %) Seminole Square 12 (9.1 %) Kmart 14 (10.6 %) Barracks Road Shopping Cenler 25 (18.9%) Univer~ity of Virginia 26 (19.7 %) l ~ ~ I<~~ / \~~-- ~. &;Y¡,: d1 ~'/;)' -:0 Þro o ·0 "'~ ~ f1\ 4. ~\ :::-./ \" D ;Yo -<J ; () '-'" direction· . dicates Arrow ~n of travel. "---.., Ai)";Ff,) 0-'-__ , - \.) Ol~ 5Q C:IJ·III I"? N l /.', /"/'J' '- / $ .; /·"·'o.J )/ / ./ IAl'f IvIA) I 'FA: ;IIIOi'! ~HI , _ / Ì;I () 'I '11'11:. <p-fTl" j 0 / // //"'~/"./' / ~., <. ). (y/ -- \ "1. /Ù¡ /~- c- ()-'-~~O. O~_E~_ / ./ -j ~),-,.------ - :,,( ('" ^' ~ - -- -. ............ ,</ g- -- -.----- - - /" -' ,2:. '_.... ~< /,') __" _' . ..'/. \ì\' C-y1rCY- .'_ ~----'(:TÚ\\ \ O'/' '1'0 fWA T.E /- ... I, N 1}o /,). o --1é) , . . PROPOSED BUS ROUTE '~ . dicates direction Arrow ~n of travel. "--~----....... A1 »ENç::---O--'----- ,,) I'? 6'J / BEI<I<LEY SI~OPI'III~~:; W()<I ) /'~ \"./' N ~o ~ 'NO'!' '1'0 fiCALE D\'IE _______________6= 3-7·~~ ------------------------------------- ~ ITlMID. __Zj{_~Z~65~S ~/ -------------------------- '--------" ' ALDn\ ITIMIWÆ ~¿-¥r!Æ-¢¿¿- DEFERRED UNTIL _______~~~~-------------------__ .: /U ~ It'V{ £/»7 Yò CI 7~ Form. 3 7/25/86 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the construction of the Meadow Creek Parkway is critical to solving the transportation needs of Albemarle County, the City of Charlottesville, and Central Virginia; and WHEREAS, Albemarle County has many other documented road needs and the designation of the Meadow Creek Parkway for Primary Road funding would free Secondary Road funding for other essential road priorities; and WHEREAS, the Meadow Creek Parkway is the County's highest priority road need and withdrawal of support for grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North would recognizs that the Commonwealth has limited funds available and that these limited funds should be spent on the projects with the greatest immediate benefit to this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors gives its full support to designing a Meadow Creek Parkway which is both cost-effective and realistic and asks that the Commonwealth Transporta- tion Board designate the Meadow Creek Parkway as a Primary Highway and place it in the current Six-Year Primary Road plan for funding; and FURTHER RESOLVED that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors hereby withdraws its previous support for Grade-Separated Interchanges on Route 29 at Hydraulic, Greenbrier and Rio Roads. * * * * * I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on May 3, 1995. C~~Of~~~ 0( " RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the construction of the Meadow Creek Parkway is critical to solving the transportation needs of Albemarle County, the City of Charlottesville, and Central Virginia; and WHEREAS, Albemarle County has many other documented road needs and the designation of the Meadow Creek Parkway for Primary Road funding would free Secondary Road funding for other essential road priorities; and WHEREAS, the Meadow Creek Parkway is the County's highest priority road need and withdrawal of support for grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North would recognizs that the Commonwealth has limited funds available and that these limited funds should be spent on the projects with the greatest immediate benefit to this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors gives its full support to designing a Meadow Creek Parkway which is both cost-effective and realistic and asks that the Commonwealth Transporta- tion Board designate the Meadow Creek Parkway as a Primary Highway and place it in the current Six-Year Primary Road plan for funding; and FURTHER RESOLVED that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors hereby withdraws its previous support for Grade-Separated Interchanges on Route 29 at Hydraulic, Greenbrier and Rio Roads. * * * * * I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on May 3, 1995. c~~ Of~nt~~ « . David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Charles S Martin R IvðnOd Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hdll Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. ScottsVllle Sally H. Thomas Sim1Ue! Miller May 9, 1995 The Honorable Robert E. Martinez Secretary of Transportation P. O. Box 1475 Richmond, VA 23212 Dear Mr. Martinez: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, ~~ar0! £, Cler EWC: len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper ~ David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 229024596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 May 9, 1995 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins While Hal! Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scotlsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller Mr. David R. Gehr, Vice Chairman Commonwealth Transportation Board 1401 E. Broad street Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Mr. Gehr: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, iWca0/ ~k EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled po per David P. Bowerman Charlot tesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 May 9, 1995 Charles S. Martin R ivðnna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scotlsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Mil1er Mr. Thomas A. Barton, Jr. Suffolk District, Commonwealth Transportation Board 2717 Virginia Beach Blvd. Virginia Beach, VA 23452 Dear Mr. Barton: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, f!kcarW ~k EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman ChðrloltesviJle COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 40 I McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 2965843 FAX (804) 972-4060 May 9, 1995 Charles S. Martin Rivannð Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scoltsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller Mrs. Gary W. Brooks Member, Commonwealth Transportation Board "Up the Creek" P. O. Box 129 Merry Point, VA 22513 Dear Mrs. Brooks: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, ¿%ref!CM(~k EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 May 9, 1995 Charles S. Martm R ¡vanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins Whire Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scollsvil!e Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller Mr. Roy Parrish Byrd Lynchburg District, Commonwealth Transportation Board Route 2, Box 24D Chatham, VA 24531 Dear Mr. Byrd: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, ~~jd '~rk EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Charloftesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 972·4060 May 9, 1995 Charles S. Martin R ¡vannð Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall. Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller Mr. M. Philmore Howlette Richmond District, Commonwealth Transportation Board 316 W. Leigh street Richmond, VA 23220 Dear Mr. Howlette: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, ¿MrW C~k EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman O1arlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902A596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 May 9, 1995 Charles S. Martin R,vi\m1ð Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Joueft Walter F. Perkms While Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scoltsvine Sally H Thomas S.HHlWI Miller Ms. Lorinda G. Lionberger Salem District, Commonwealth Transportation Board P. O. Box 20209 Roanoke, VA 24018-0507 Dear Ms. Lionberger: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, E~%/:! C~k EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 May 9, 1995 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouelt Walter F. Perkins Wh,te Hal! Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scotlsville Sally H Thomas Samuel MtI]er Mr. H. Carter Myers, Member, Commonwealth 440 Rockwood Drive Charlottesville, VA III Transportation Board 22903 Dear Mr. Myers: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, El~~rf:!£~k EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Charlotlesvtlle COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 May 9, 1995 Charles S. Martin R ¡vanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins WhIte Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scoltsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller Mr. Zeanious L. Newcomb Fredericksburg District, Commonwealth Transportation Board 708 Lendall Lane Fredericksburg, VA 22405 Dear Mr. Newcomb: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, ~~rç¡{;~ir EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper DaVId P. Bowerman Charlot tesville SCOltWlllf' COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 May 9, 1995 Charles S. Martin R ivanna Charlotte Y Humphris J<Kk Jouet t Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller Mr. Max B. Porter Member, Commonwealth Transportation Board P. O. Box 511 Boykins, VA 23827 Dear Mr. Porter: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, ~~artd ~k EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902A596 (804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 972A060 May 9, 1995 Charles S. Martin Rivðnnð Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins While Hðll Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H Thomas Samuel Miller Mr. Joseph A. Rhea, Jr. Bristol District, Commonwealth Transportation Board Hill street, Box 700 Damascus, VA 24236 Dear Mr. Rhea: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, ç/,(J Wl£L ~carey, CMC~k EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 May 9, 1995 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. ScollsVllle Sally H. Thomas Samuel MIller Mr. James E. Rich Member, Commonwealth Transportation Board 1401 I st., N.W., suite 1030 Washington, D.C. 20005 Dear Mr. Rich: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. s~CerelY, /JWcaW CMC, Cl EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins While Hat! Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scoftsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller May 9, 1995 Mr. William s. Roudabush Culpeper District, Commonwealth Transportation Board P. O. Box 1222 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Mr. Roudabush: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, lÜ0ca!d ~k EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper · David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R Marshall, Jr. Scottsv;lIe Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller May 9, 1995 Mr. Daphyne S. Thomas staunton District, Commonwealth Transportation Board 1112 Sharpes Drive Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Dear Mr. Thomas: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. :£¡¡;:~w ~~ EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper · David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 2965843 FAX (804) 296·5800 May 9, 1995 Charles S. Martin R ¡vanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scoltsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller Mr. Byron E. Waldman Northern Virginia District Commonwealth Transportation Board 201 N. Union st., suite 300 Alexandria, VA 22314 Dear Mr. Waldman: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, EZæ-ca~ ~rk EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper · David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 May 9, 1995 Charles S. Martin Rivðnnd Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins While Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scoltsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller Mr. Ulysses X. White Member, Commonwealth Transportation Board P. O. Box 390 Manassas, VA 22110 Dear Mr. White: Enclosed please find a copy of a resolution adopted by the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors at a meeting held on May 3, 1995. This resolution is in reference to the grade-separated interchanges on Route 29 North and the Meadow Creek Parkway. Sincerely, ~it~ cVrL~rk EWC:len Enclosure * Printed on recycled paper þ_M .".._. COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE .l~ s--/_}?~ ""'-.-----.,-.-.!-_.."",,,,,,, J.,~...;/;~..... j~...r; -... "...._~-""..~.,..,...'"'...-..,...."'~..1f_ MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors David P. Bowerman, superVi~ May 1, 1995 Me~k Parkway 1995 DATE: RE: I have sent this material to you for discussion at Wednesday's meeting under other highway matters. These thoughts and the accompanying resolution is a result of my recent discussions with Bill Roudabush and Carter Myers and my best thinking regarding the~eek Parkway and the likelihood of having the Meadowcreek Parkway included in VDOT's 6 year Primary Road Plan. Some of my comments are obvious and others maybe not so. Albemarle County will never acquire enough secondary highway funds to construct the Meadowheek Parkway (MCP) from Rio Road north to Route 29 and still fund our other secondary~h~ay priorities. The MCP must be designated a primary highway by the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) in order to receive primary road funding. At an estimated cost of $72 million, it is very unlikely that the CTB will redesignate the MCP as a primary road and place it ahead of existing primary highway needs in other areas of the Commonwealth, especially in those areas where there is unified local support and little controversy. The MCP's cost must be lowered in order to have a realistic chance of receiving both a primary designation as well as funding in the 6 year Primary Road plan. The Board of Supervisors needs to work with county staff, VDOT staff, our local representatives to the Commonwealth Transportation as well as with the community, to redirect and redesign the MCP to lower the cost. The first change should be a realistic decision to move to construct only two lanes instead of four lanes as our first priority, if necessary. The Board of Supervisors is sending a mixed signal to the public and the CTB by stating that the MCP is our highest priority and at the same time saying that we continue to believe that Grade Separated Interchanges (GSI) should be at the same level of importance as the MCP and should also be constructed. The City and CTB have both decided that the GSI will not be built and it is both ,It 4 ~~ Albemarle County Board of Supervisors May 1, 1995 RE: Meadowcreek Parkway Page 2 of2 politically naive and counter-productive for us to continue to insist that both the GSI and the MCP be funded in the primary road plan. Therefore, I propose that our Board adopt the content of the following Resolution and send it to the Secretary of Transportation and every member of the CTB and that it become our working policy. I move that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors give its full support to designing a Mead~ek Parkway which is both cost effective and realistic and ask that the Commonwealth Transportation Board designate the Me~ek Parkway as a Primary Highway and place it in the current six year Primary Road plan for funding. I additionally move that the Board of Supervisors withdraw its previous support for Grade Separated Interchanges on Route 29 at Hydraulic, Greenbrier and Rio Roads. This action is necessary because: (1) The construction of the M~eek Parkway is critical to solving the transportation needs of Albemarle County, the City of Charlottesville and Central Virginia. (2) Albemarle County has many other documented road needs and the designation of Me~ek Parkway for Primary Road funding would free Secondary Road funding for these other essential road priorities. (3) The Mead~k Parkway is our highest priority road need and withdrawal of support for grade separated interchanges recognizes that the Commonwealth has limited funds available and they should be spent on these projects with the greatest immediate benefit to our community. DPB/dbm 95.008 · May 3, 1995, Board Meeting Discussion of the Meadow Creek Parkway and the Interchanges on Route 29 (Page 1) Mr. Bowerman said that on Monday, May 1, 1995, he had distributed to the Board members a memorandum regarding an issue the Board needs to address, that of the Board's continued support of interchanges on Route 29 North in light of the action of the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB), and in light of the action taken by city Council. Since the Board is desperately trying to get funding for the Meadow Creek Parkway (MCP), it is his belief that this Board should withdraw its support for the interchanges and reiterate its support for the Meadow Creek Parkway. Mr. Bowerman said he discussed the memorandum with Mrs. Humphris and Mrs. Thomas yesterday, and they both had issues with him. Mrs. Thomas then handed to the Board a piece of paper containing her proposed wording, which basically put the proposal into resolution form. She said the italicized words at the end of the first paragraph suggest specifi- cally what the Board would be doing. She is a member of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), and that has to do with the CATS plan, so the resolution sets out the things the Board would be agreeable to doing. She said it puts it in a positive mode, and says precisely what the Board will do. It is essentially what the Board said in its statement at the preallocation hearing (on March 29). Since there seems to be some confusion about that (she has not seen a copy of the fax to the CTB for that meeting), she would like to set it out positively, rather than in a negative way. She would like to put this motion on the table. Mrs. Thomas' motion read: The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors gives it full support to designing a Meadow Creek Parkway that is both cost effective and realistic. We ask the Commonwealth Transportation Board to designate the Meadow Creek Parkway as a Primary Highway and place it in the current Six-Year Primary Road plan for funding. The Board of Supervi- sors states its intention to move the Parkway ahead of the grade- separated interchanges in the CATS plan, in the Three-Party Agreement, and in any other actions we will take at this time regarding primary road planning and construction in the County. We note that the Meadow Creek Parkway is critical to solving the transportation needs of Albemarle County, the City of Charlottesville, and Central Virginia. We note that Albemarle County has many other documented road needs and the designation of Meadow Creek Parkway for Primary Road funding would free Secondary Road funding for these other essential road priorities. We realize that the Commonwealth has limited funds available which should be spend on projects with the greatest benefit to its residents. To reemphasize, the Meadow Creek Parkway has the highest primary road priority for meeting the needs of this region at this time. Mrs. Humphris gave second. She went back over the statement this Board made to the CTB at its March 29 preallocation hearing on the interstate and primary systems, and it says what this Board needs to say. In the surface transportation program, the Meadow Creek Parkway is the County's primary goal. It was only under the National Highway System (NHS), which is the Route 29 corridor itself that the Board asked that the interchanges be kept in for consideration in the future. The reason for that is that the $3.729 million study says that for this locality (Albemarle, Charlottesville, and the area), those interchanges are still the only thing that will solve the local trans- portation problem. This Board's presentation to the CTB acknowledges that the ~ May 3, 1995, Board Meeting Discussion of the Meadow Creek Parkway and the Interchanges on Route 29 (Page 2) interchanges are a dead issue at this time, and if they continue to be dead the Board understands that, and the Meadow Creek Parkway in the surface transportation program is this Board's priority. That is clear. It seems that the message which should be conveyed to the CTB is (in a positive way), the importance of the Meadow Creek Parkway to this part of the state, and that is what they need to hear. Mrs. Humphris said if this Board moves to pullout the interchanges so that in essence a record is created stating that this Board did not think they were necessary, that is a mistake. What the Board needs to do is learn from the experience the Board is having now. People are saying that somebody promised them 20 years ago that the County would not expand the landfill beyond a certain dimension or a certain time period. None of the members of the present Board had anything to do with that, nor does anybody know that that was ever said. Nevertheless, the Board is being handicapped in its decision-making by having that be said. People are saying now about the decision on the high school site that they were told 20 years ago that the next high school would be built in their area. None of the present Board members had anything to do with that, but they are being presented with a difficult problem because of what is being said. Mrs. Humphris said if this Board were to say now that it withdraws from its knowledge that the interchanges are going to be necessary to the movement of traffic on Route 29 at sometime in the future, whether it is the year 2010, 2015, or whenever, some future Board will be handicapped in their decision- making. It is not necessary to say that those interchanges will not, at sometime, be in the solution to 29 North. What the Board needs to do is make the clear statement that Mrs. Thomas has provided saying that the Meadow Creek Parkway has this Board's full support, but it recognizes that they have limited funds, but the Meadow Creek Parkway is the highest primary road priority for this Board at this time. That seems to be the message that needs to go to them, and this resolution is based on the Board's attendance at the CTB work session on this several weeks ago where the Board heard what the members of the CTB are concerned about. Mr. Marshall said he met with Bill Roudabush and Carter Myers, and he believes all Board members have. He was told in no uncertain terms that if the Board did not back off from the grade-separated interchanges and support the City and the University and the CTB, that it could forget about trying to get any money for the Meadow Creek Parkway. He asked if any of the other Board members were told the same thing. Mrs. Thomas said she thinks that is what her resolution does. It does not mention the grade-separated interchanges except to say that the County is moving the Meadow Creek Parkway ahead of these. The resolution does not suggest that primary road funds be used for this purpose. Mr. Marshall said Mr. Roudabush and Mr. Myers want the Board to make a statement, and Mr. Bowerman put it adequately, "It is politically naive and counterproductive for this Board to continue to insist that both the grade- separated interchanges and the Meadow Creek Parkway be funded in the primary road plan. If this Board expects them to get out and work for the funds for the Meadow Creek Parkway, this Board has to make the statement, take a vote on the grade-separated interchanges and put the issue to rest, or the Board can forget the other. Mrs. Thomas said she realizes that they said they will not work for the Board unless we make that statement. Mrs. Humphris said she needed to correct Mrs. Thomas. Mr. Myers said he · May 3, 1995, Board Meeting Discussion of the Meadow Creek Parkway and the Interchanges on Route 29 (Page 3) would not work for the County. Mr. Roudabush said that Mrs. Humphris' position was perfectly acceptable to him. Mr. Marshall said they did not tell him that. Mrs. Humphris said Mrs. Thomas and she met with the two gentlemen at the same time, and the message from Mr. Myers was that he would not work for this community to help get the Meadow Creek Parkway funded in the primary system unless the Board gave up totally on the interchanges. She explained that she could not do that because this Board has to be concerned about what is best for this locality, so the Board's concern needs to be for the locality first, whereas his might be the state's interests first, and Mr. Roudabush said three different times during this conversation that he understood Mrs. Humphris' position that there can be the Meadow Creek Parkway as the County's highest priority without giving up on the fact that at sometime in the future those interchanges will have to be brought back for consideration, and the Board's job is to stand up for what is necessary here. Mr. Martin said basically the two pieces of paper say the same thing. All the Board members had meetings with two members of the CTB. He feels that those meetings probably went in different directions, same topic, but differ- ent directions. There is no way to set here today and act as if all had the same meeting when they didn't. The bottom line is, what all know is that the City, as well as the CTB, have basically said they are not interested in the interchanges at this time. Now, that is where the Board gets bogged down, "at this time". Some of the Board members want to say "at this time" but it still be a priority for the future. Others of us, and what the CTB would like for the Board to say, is not just "its not at this time", but, "not at this time and it is not a high priority at this time", Not have it the second highest priority so if we get the first the very next thing that comes up is the grade-separated interchanges. All that needs be done is some rewording and that objective is accomplished, and all can vote for it because all Board members know what the deal is. Mrs. Thomas said she would be happy to say it is at the bottom of the list if that is any help. Mr. Martin said if you take the letter sent out by Mr. Bowerman, it says "withdrawal of support", and maybe the Board does not want to use those words because that forecloses the future, and the Board does not want to do that because at some point in the future those grade-separated interchanges may be needed. On the other hand, in the first paragraph of Mrs. Thomas' wording, it states "its intention to move the Parkway ahead of the grade-separated interchanges" implies that the second next priority will be the interchanges, that is what it implies. It is a little away from where the Board needs to be, so this should not be turned into a back and forth seesaw thing. Simply come up with some wording (maybe Larry Davis can do it) that is a little less strong than "withdrawal of support", and a little stronger ahead of the "grade-separated interchanges." Mrs. Humphris said she made it very clear to Mr. Roudabush and Mr.Myers because they did not seem to understand that she is a realist, and will not spend one minute of time, or one ounce of her energy on the grade-separated interchanges. For her, for now, that is a totally dead issue. Mr. Martin said the Board members all know that, so why not just say it. Mrs. Humphris said she will spend all of her time and effort on the Meadow Creek Parkway, and she simply does not want to compromise any future Board and put a handicap on them. · May 3, 1995, Board Meeting Discussion of the Meadow Creek Parkway and the Interchanges on Route 29 (Page 4) Mr. Bowerman said before the Board goes further, he would like to say that he appreciates and respects the comments made by Mrs. Humphris and Mrs. Thomas. The Board is dealing with more than just two members of the CTB. It is actually dealing with the entire board of 15 to 17 people. There are many projects in the immediate six-year plan competing for primary funds. Many jurisdictions are of one mind completely about what those funds should be. As long as this Board promotes something that has been rejected by them them- selves and the City, it seems the Board is just working against itself for no real gain. This Board talked about boards changing their minds, but he feels that if the interchanges are needed ten years from now, a new traffic count will have to be done. If the County gets to year 2008 and there is traffic on Route 29 and the Meadow Creek Parkway and a western bypass and the traffic can't move, it will have to be dealt with, but it won't be used as an impedi- ment now to get something that is much needed, the Meadow Creek Parkway. He does not believe it forecloses the opportunity in any way to revisit the issue. Mr. Bowerman said he participated in the Meadow Creek Parkway studies in the early '80s and those studies showed "T" connectors into Forest Lakes. He thought they made sense, but the public told him that they did not make sense, and now they are no longer being talked about. Things change over time. He is just recognizing that and, recognizing that, right now, the interchanges are a dead issue that should be recognized so the Board can move on and work for one purpose, the Meadow Creek Parkway. Mrs. Thomas said she was at the work session when the CTB dealt with, and was presented with, the issue of the Meadow Creek Parkway. Juan Wade was there, and so was Sarah Cagle. She thinks the interchanges were never mentioned in that discussion. The CTB's question had nothing to do with whether this community wants interchanges or the Meadow Creek Parkway, the question was totally whether this community knows whether it wants the Alternative 10 Bypass, or the Meadow Creek Parkway. What do they want? Several times the question was asked, what does this community want? No one there answered that question. There was a tremendous amount of waffling around to dance around that issue because it was not to anyone's interest (Mrs. Thomas said she does not need to suggest what their motives were), but people did not answer that question. The CTB is not concerned about whether the County is still pushing for the interchanges. They had an entire work session and at least a third of them asked questions. No one there asked that question. She realizes that Mr. Bowerman has been told something different, but she was there and heard what they were asking, and this is not where their confusion was. Mr. Bowerman said behind the scenes he was told him that there had been correspondence to members of the CTB that reiterated this Board's position and the statement in Culpeper. It said the Board continues to believe the inter- changes are a necessary item and every member of the CTB got that letter which raised the issue in their minds, and the only reason he knows that is because Mr. Myers and Mr. Roudabush told him that. Mr. Marshall said he also saw the letter. Mr. Bowerman said the letter was also sent to the Board, and there has been further correspondence since then. It seems to him that when this Board is dealing with a public issue, and two segments of the public are saying different things, if everything is equal and one side is more unified than the other, the Board tends to support those who want it the most. The Board tends to recognize what the public wants. He thinks the CTB has to be sensitive to the communications it receives from this community, and they have to be aware that this has been going on for twenty years. The interchanges have been used · May 3, 1995, Board Meeting Discussion of the Meadow Creek Parkway and the Interchanges on Route 29 (Page 5) many times as a method of saying, "look, with the interchanges and improve- ments to 29, and the Meadow Creek Parkway, we don't need the western bypass, at least we don't need it for 20 years." Mr. Bowerman said he was part of that, and he agreed with that. They Mr. Bowerman said they are going to build the western bypass now, and that is no longer an issue in his mind. They are not going to build the interchanges with the information the Board currently has, so why not recog- nize that. Let the community deal with one issue which is the Meadow Creek Parkway, and the other issue would be designing whatever they come forward with on Alternate 10 so it meets the needs of this community in the best way possible, and "stop beating our heads against the wall." That is what the Board is doing. Mrs. Thomas said she realizes that Mr. Myers wanted them to tell the citizens that they cannot write to the CTB Mr. Bowerman said that is not what he said. Mrs. Thomas said that is what was said to herself and Mrs. Humphris. Mrs. Humphris said that is what was said. Mr. Martin said that is why the Board needs to get away from behind the scenes because it does not count. The bottom line is the last part of what Mr. Bowerman said, which is the reality of the situation, and the Board needs to just face it. It all boils down to a matter of wording. If the Board can't come up with wording that all can agree to, then just take a vote up or down on either one of these proposals because all the Board members know what the deal is. All may have a slightly different reason for how the deal came about, or what the political ramifications are behind the scenes, but all know what the deal is now, so let the Board make a decision. If the Board can't come up with favorable wording, then take each proposal and vote it up or down. Mrs. Thomas said she is willing to say that something like the grade- separated interchanges are a dead issue which is just recognizing reality. Mr. Martin asked Mr. Davis if he had some wording to propose. Mrs. Humphris said she has to clarify something. It should not be left just hanging out there. When she and Mrs. Thomas met with Mr. Myers and Mr. Roudabush the other day, one of them put the Charlottesville Transportation Coalition letters on the table, and complained about them saying they did not want citizens to continue to bother members of the CTB and Secretary Martinez with this kind of input. As she remembers, those letters complained about the public hearing process, and they questioned the way the citizen input was dealt with at two public hearings that were held here recently to do with the interchanges. It was the process that those letters were dealing with. She explained to those gentlemen that we still have here a representative democra- cy. Members on this Board have said that they believe one thousand percent in citizen input. The Board members ask for it, beg for it, like it, and would never think of telling any citizen or citizen's group to stop giving input to their public servants. She regards Secretary Martinez, members of the CTB, and the two local representatives, as citizen public servants the same as the Board members. She said that what Mrs. Thomas said about the CTB work session two weeks ago was exactly correct. The pertinent questions asked there were: so they want them both? The "both" was the bypass or Meadow Creek Parkway, nothing to do with interchanges. What do they want first? She said the final question to the two representatives was, "you all live there, have we done it May 3, 1995, Board Meeting Discussion of the Meadow Creek Parkway and the Interchanges on Route 29 (Page 6) right?" referring to the bypass and Meadow Creek Parkway. The interchanges are dead as far as this CTB is concerned. It is going to serve no good purpose for this Board to withdraw its support because that support is based on a legitimate need for the community and a legitimate report to the VDOT and the CTB. She agreed with Mr. Martin that the purpose can be achieved without withdrawing support and without declaring that the Board has a second priori- ty. Mr. Bowerman said the words "dead issue" works for him. Mr. Martin said the words "dead issue" works for him. Mr. Marshall said "dead issue" works for him up to a point. He asked to discuss the letter further because there is a lot more in it than what Mrs. Humphris said. He said the individual who wrote the letter went so far as to tell the members of the CTB that this Board had taken no action on those grade-separated interchanges, and because this Board had taken no action it is believed that the Board still has some support. That is what the letter said. Based on that statement, the members of the CTB and Secretary Martinez think that this Board is still supporting it. This Board needs to put the issue to rest. Mr. Martin asked that the Board members give Mr. Davis a chance, and if that doesn't work, he will just call the motion and let the Board vote. Mr. Davis said he tried to capture the compromise by using the proposed alternative of Mrs. Thomas and replacing her italicized wording at the end of the first paragraph by saying "The Board of Supervisors states its intention to make the Meadow Creek Parkway its number one priority in the primary road plan for funding, notwithstanding the grade-separated interchanges identified in the CATS plan and in the three-party agreement. It is recognized that the grade-separated interchanges are not projects to be funded in the Six-Year funding plan." That states that it is not the present intention of this Board to ask for funding in the six-year funding plan, which, of course, carries for a period of six years. Mr. Marshall said it leaves this individual wide open to write another letter. Mr. Bowerman said it is not the individual, it is the issue of the Board continuing to say one thing, and taking action saying another. The Board has two positions, and the public has every right to use those two positions to confuse the issue. Mrs. Humphris said this Board did not have two positions. Mr. Bowerman said the Board did because it was in the Board's statement in Culpeper. Mrs. Humphris said the statement said "for NHS projects", which is for Route 29 projects the interchanges remain the priority. It said for the other projects, the standard projects, the Meadow Creek Parkway was the highest priority. They are two different things. At this point, Mr. Martin called for the question. Mrs. Thomas said she would accept the amended version of the resolution as read by Mr. Davis. Or, she will accept some other version. Mr. Martin said he had already called for the question. May 3, 1995, Board Meeting Discussion of the Meadow Creek Parkway and the Interchanges on Route 29 (Page 7) Mr. Marshall said he would second it. Mr. Perkins requested a roll call on the motion to call for the ques- tion: Mr. Perkins: Aye. Mrs. Thomas: Aye. Mr. Bowerman: Aye. Mrs. Humphris: Aye. Mr. Marshall: Aye. Mr. Martin: Aye. Mr. Perkins immediately asked that the Clerk call the roll on the motion. The Clerk asked for an official copy of what was being discussed. Mr. Marshall said the Board was discussing Mrs. Thomas' motion. Mr. Bowerman said that is with the amendment added by Mr. Davis. Mrs. Thomas said at this point, roll call is on the original motion. Mr. Martin said every time he tried to get a compromise, everybody started getting into who's to blame, who's at fault, and that is not what the Board needs to be dealing with. Roll call (on the original motion) was: Mr. Perkins: No. Mrs. Thomas: Aye. Mr. Bowerman: No. Mrs. Humphris: Aye. Mr. Marshall: No. Mr. Martin: No. Mr. Perkins said the motion fails 4/2. Mr. Bowerman immediately moved that the motion he presented to the Board in the memorandum of Monday, which he will provide to the Clerk, be adopted by this Board and become its policy regarding the Meadow Creek Parkway, and the interchanges. Mr. Marshall gave second to the motion. Mrs. Thomas asked if Mr. Bowerman would be amendable to any amendments. Mr. Marshall said "no". The Board will get back into the same discus- sion it just left. Mr. Martin said if the Board can't agree to something, he will call for the motion again. Let Mr. Davis read his options, and if the Board can't agree to one, there is no sense in going back to how it got to this point, it's useless. , . May 3, 1995, Board Meeting Discussion of the Meadow Creek Parkway and the Interchanges on Route 29 (Page 8) Mr. Perkins asked for a roll call. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: Mr. Perkins: Aye. Mrs. Thomas: No. Mr. Bowerman: Aye. Mrs. Humphris: No. Mr. Marshall: Aye. Mr. Martin: Aye. The motion, as copied from a letter dated May I, 1995, addressed to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, read: I move that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors give its full support to designing a Meadow Creek Parkway which is both cost effective and realistic and ask that the Commonwealth Transportation Board designate the Meadow Creek Parkway as a Primary Highway and place it in the current Six-Year Primary Road plan for funding. I additionally move that the Board of Supervisors withdraw its previous support for Grade-Separated Interchanges on Route 29 at Hydraulic, Greenbrier and Rio Roads. This action is necessary because: (1) The construction of the Meadow Creek Parkway is critical to solving the transportation needs of Albemarle County, the City of Charlottesville, and Central Virginia. (2) Albemarle County has many other documented road needs and the designation of Meadow Creek Parkway for Primary Road funding would free Secondary Road funding for these other essential road priori- ties. (3) The Meadow Creek Parkway is our highest priority road need and withdrawal of support for grade-separated interchanges recognizes that the Commonwealth has limited funds available and they should be spent on these projects with the greatest immediate benefit to our community. A1a/yð:! .p-;3Ø- ~ Albemarle County Board of Supervisors May 1, 1995 RE: Meadowcreek Parkway Page 2 of2 ~i Jf)L L (7- politically naive and counter-productive for us to continue to insist that both the GSI and the MCP be funded in the primary road plan. //' 'l..-"v1.."~ ~{ / / Therefore, I propose that our Board adopt the content of the following Resolution and send it to the Secretary of Transportation and every member of the CTB and that it become our working policy. I move that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors give its full support to designing a Meadowcreek Parkway which is both cost effective and realistic and ask that the Commonwealth " Transportation Board designate the Meadowcreek Parkway as a Primary Highway and place it in the ,1.. current six year Primary Road plan for funding. I additionally move that the Board of Supervisors \5'~~ withdtàw it..! prc-¡ious support -for Grade Separated Interchanges on Route 29 at Hydraulic, ~(o '\ r Greenbrier and Rio Roads. This action is necessary because: ~, ~ f f/J 1.7 :r J.5 L{ 12- ~ ~ t- (1) The construction of the Meadowcreek Parkway is critical to solving the transportation needs :'\ ~ of Albemarle County, the City of Charlottesville and Central Virginia. (Iv ¥ (2) Albemarle County has many other documented road needs and the designation of Meadowcreek Parkway for Primary Road funding would free Secondary Road funding for these other essential road priorities. ~ç ( Ji; - f I a\ ~v. 0 tV ~ ~\, ¡ o ('-~~ . ç ( ,;;¡U 1:- P" ~' ..lbr lJ- .1 ¡¡,VJ The Meadowcreek Parkway is our highest priority road need and withdrawal of support for grade separated interchanges recognizes that the Commonwealth has limited funds available and they should be spent on these projects with the greatest immediate benefit to our community. ?É~ /7~2?i-? Proposed alternative wording of resolution: The Albemarle County Board of Supervisors gives its full support to designing a Meadowcreek Parkway that is both cost effective and realistic. We ask the Commonwealth Transportation Board to designate the Meadowcreek Parkway as a Primary Highway and place it in the current six year Primary Road plan for funding. The Board of Supervisors states its intention to move the Parkway ahead of the grade-separated interchanges in the CATS plan. in the 3-Party agreement. and in any other actions we will take at this time regarding primary road planning and construction in the County. We recognize that the Meadowcreek Parkway is critical to solving the transportation needs of Albemarle County, the City of Charlottesville, and Central Virginia. We note that Albemarle County has many other documented road needs and the designation of Meadowcreek Parkway for Primary Road funding would free Secondary Road funding for these other essential road priorities. We realize that the Commonwealth has limited funds available which should be spent on projects with the greatest benefit to its residents. To reemphasize. the Meadowcreek Parkway has the highest primary road priority for meeting the needs of this region at this time. ,\ David P. Bowerman Charlottesvil1e COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 May 15, 1995 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scoltsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller Mr. Richard E. Carter Taylor, Zunka, Milnor & Carter, Ltd. 414 Park street P. O. Box 1567 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Re: Abandonment of possible public rights-of-way for a road off of state Route 664 Dear Mr. Carter: Enclosed please find the instrument of abandonment adopted by the Board on May 3, 1995. Please have this document recorded in Shelby Marshall's office and return a copy of the receipt to this office. If I can be of further help, call me at 296-5843. Sincerely, 8~~ ~~~ EWC:len Attachment '. * Printed on recycled paper .. , . ROAD DESCRIPTION A public road beginning at the common intersection of State Route 664 and the southernmost common boundary on State Route 664 of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29A, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, thence in a northeasterly direction along the common boundary of said Tax Map 19, Parcel 29A, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, to the southernmost point of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, thence continuing in a northeasterly direction on the common boundary of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, to a point where Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, and Tax Map 20, Parcel 6A all intersect. Thence in a northwesterly direction along the common boundary line of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, and Tax Map 20, Parcel 6A, to Tax Map 19, Parcel 32C, where said road ends. a-e\butler.des . . 5 ....."f··~Jj..w I....· -,q S ('9";>..,9.... I/:t.1oJ, 1'1" .f; ,~I(J ..-,ç ./5··... /t~tt I.t ._ 6r" ~,,'"'.- "£ tÞ.~ ('(1 SJ,Øol!l'.': It' 06 (1(' S ().!"'_'~ .(,oi"K· ~.. ~..' ::: .(2" ';"!:¡ ...,,"£ J9-1/4J $ ,.qO(l.?'.!6· E 4/544 \' fC"¡"/5"E _ Ib"r..14 :. dr! R,r:~, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \. "\ \ ~ \ \ ,.~:'(-:.,. /"" ~\" . "/ /.., f"':· ~ , .~ . " tj fl ~:--..:;'~I ·~.~f , 1, f ~ I, :.. t. ~ '" t:. ", J '", >, j " "., ,. .... .l' x.._ _ ~.-:r;" N 16°4/'5"£ 6S5.00 --"',' r:' S.L 2 fACl335 y'+' '~I . ,; ";. PLAT SHOWING A SURVEY AND DIVISION OF PROPERTY OF TED TUCKER DESIGNATED AS PARCEL 29A, TAX MAP/9 NEAR EARLYSVILLE ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: I" = 200' MAY 25,1972 11.lo" s Rd9n,~' NOTE: Tracls A and Core subjecI 10 R/W wilhin 15 feel of EosI boundory. S,?,q °58 ''';':J''t" ¿2jJ)n r;JIO~9·¿.""£ 459.!JO S~SOJJ'05"E' 422.20 TRACT C 39.69 Ac. REFER: 5 49°/4'2. S 271.99 08 264p 518 (Plol) "on 5J4054'$';"" .:-' J~40 !\l4S008'<J" 5?4.58 W L.. 6; Cal...... Nøn.,cuII 10.·J 5;.> 498. !H ¡lOll {"-.' 5J4°54'$4.. ....s- 150.00 . -~"~ ,j; h" ; ~ .. TRACT B 8./2 Ac. V> õ-. '" . ·v.¥> '7t;.r~.",TFf.~CT ~ :. .~ ~¡ ô.33'Ac: WILLIAM S ROUDABUSH, JR. CERTlFI£D LAND SURVEYOR "I>..... '#"'\ I...., ) ,,~ /-1.-"-' ,~; 1 . '9·~;i¡~ Ii·· :. : . . t I~ " -.. J." ;0:... Si4T€~.--C- -: ..j....,..<'-' o~'/. 00.:. .,. ".1 ~:.;~':t~. . :'t:.,:·:\<~t\:··· ... . --,.~., ..~.\...:. .~~:;.. -', ... "'~~-'- '~.¿J '\ . RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Board was petitioned by a citizen to abandon a section of an old road not in the State Highway or Secondary System; and WHEREAS, the Board, on March 1, 1995, ordered that this matter be advertised for public hearing in accordance with Virginia Code Section 33.1-157; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on May 3, 1995, the Board finding that the said section of road serves no public necessity; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle Countv, Virginia. that an old road right-of-way shown on the attached exhibit be abandoned as a public road per the following description: A public road not in the State Highway System beginning at the common intersection of State Route 664 and the southernmost common boundary on State Route 664 of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29A, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, thence in a northeasterly direction along the common boundary of said Tax Map 19, Parcel 29A, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, to the southernmost point of Tax Map 19, Parcel 290, thence continuing in a northeasterly direction on the common boundary of Tax Map 19, Parcel 290, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, to a point where Tax Map 19, Parcel 290, Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, and Tax Map 20, Parcel 6A, all intersect. Thence in a northwesterly direction along the common boundary line of Tax Map 19, Parcel 290, and Tax Map 20, Parcel 6A, to Tax Map 19, Parcel 32C, where said road ends; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 33.1-163.1 of the Code of Virginia, a certified copy of this order of abandonment be recorded and indexed in the name of the County as grantor in the deed book in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia. * * * * * I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution unanimously adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular õting held on ;;:J'~5. Lr & County super~ \~ ¡ ~ \' . THE BOUNDARY INFORMATION ON THIS PLAT IS NOT CERTIFIED. THE LOCATIONS OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE VERIFIED BY F'IELD RUN SURVEY OF' BOUNDARY MARKERS FOUND ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY DECEMBER 21, 1994. SEE BOUNDARY SURVEY BY WM. S. ROUDABUSH, JR.: D.B. 512 P. JJ5 SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN HUD FLOOD ZONE C. (NOT A FLOOD HAZARD AREA) ,,:;1- ~ t>-?. \g \.~. .---- - LINE TABLE ----------------------------- 0.0. N 65'53'20' E 280.50 bo. S 15'14'14' V 155.23 co. S 09'24'19' V 183.91 do. S 71'28'45' V 108.73 eo. S 60'48'27' V 165.00 fo. S 31'48'37' V 66.00 go. S 02·24'38' V 53.84 ho. S 28'58'49' E 225.00 10. S 49'14'22' V 271.99 -' - - .- - /' , £...............-. T.M. 20 PAR. 6A ..' .' ..' ..' ................ DETAIL: 1" = 60' TRACTS A Be C ARE SUBJECT TO R/W WITHIN 15' OF EAST BOUNDARY. .d_).:.~:~~;;;·~··::· "t'''i-: .~~..,,~, ....:,.. ,", ~~ L, t . i G'~. 'Ì-" 'i'...·J..,,~v .¡.~ .!~; ~ ~~.:~ t-'J;~ ,i}l /l¡ /1// / ~7~:h~ /:.:' U/ V\ V~ t:5 trlARY M. WIŒLAN :::::·1 j~) u ~0{ i~\ ,.; No. 141,3 l! ~ íJo' ~l, ä ¡~, Þlíl:j -: <"\. ¡ 0' \:., 1..1 ,,\ c;-, .;.. / "~,~/I¡.') (.' 1\ r. ,\ ~ .;,- I ""," d \; . ......~.;/ / ,r~"''.:.:;..:.:.;>..:._ . .>.~,--..,-? . ¡ . . PLAT SHOWING PHYSICAL SURVEY T.M. 19 PAR. 29C PARCEL 29D ON TAX MAP 1 9 ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" = 300' DECEMBER 21, 1994 Cary Å:f. IYhelan .lanà Surveyor Chartottesvt'/le, Vt'rgt'n'l'a o 100 200 300 ~ SCALE IN fEET 600 I 13559 D-EU David P f)oWPrTT\dn Lj' ~'. ,I, >11<'" COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martm Ch,\f/t11.·....\:li.· R!Vdnnd Charlott\:' Y Hurnphns Walter F. Perkms While Hdll Forrest R MMsha1, Jr s, ..1'....'<. Sally H. Thomas Sdmuel Mil!l'r March 6, 1995 Mr. Richard E. Carter 414 Park Street PO Box 1567 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Mr. Carter: At its meeting on March 1, 1995, the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing for May 3, 1995, to consider your request to abandon a road off of State Route 664 near the Earlysville area. This item is scheduled to be heard at 10:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in Meeting Room #7, Second Floor of the County Office Building. You or your representative should be present at the meeting. If there lS any additional information you wish the Board to consider, please forward it to this office by April 26, 1995. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. V~ truly yours, , {¡¡/!c¿ar0iCJ, CMC EWC:mms cc: V. Wayne Cilimberg Ronald S. Keeler Larry W. Davis * Printed on recycled paper r- .' , '. '...... íñ 0> ~ '" '" o ,;, .. ..' '. , ,. -- ! i I ..~ _._.~...~"'_""_e")'J>.,,~~~,:;'¡'1itr'W·I· 'TA. ~Iô-t.."'!o;ì:~"'f"',",,""''''''''''.'' ,. ,J COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ...·~w DATE: 12/21)/95 TIME: JO:26:52 ACCOUNT: 003CLR950012363 RECEIPI: 95:0(;0019191 CASHIER: R!'Ili REG: AB05 TYPE: DEED PAYI1EH1: FULL PAYKEIH INSTRUMENT : 950012363 BOOK: IJ PAGE: 0 RECORDED: 12120/95 AT 10:26 GR~ITOR NAME: BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS EX: N LOCAllTY: CO GRANTEE MAtiE : RESOLUTI ON EX: N PERCE/IT: 1 OO~\ AND ADDRESS : NfA RECEIVED OF: TAYLOR HAL CHECK : ~15.00 DESCRIPTION 1: RESOLUTIm¡ 2: CDHSlflEHATION: CODE DESCRIPTION 301 DEEDS . ',," t- o 0) t- DC·18 (7/95) ALBE~~t~I~lRïTI11It1uRT DEED RECEIPT ,00 A5SUKEjVAL: ,00 PAID CODE DESCRIPTION 14.00 145 VSLF r I .., 100 Œ © Œ n Wi :: 1 -_....~.~'.-. .'-.: ". q . -' l' .. 25 " ~ . I,... L IBn\RD OF SUPERVISOR::; , I ¡ I 'j . I....~· !'lAP: PíHD 1,(J(! TENDERED 15. Of¡ AMOUNT PAID 15.0ù CHANGE AMT ,00 CLERK OF COURT: SHELBY J. MARSHALL " I ('1 FAX TRANSMITTAL TO Dana Hubbard FROM L E Neher CO Daily Proqress CO Albemarle County DEPT Classified PHONE # 296-5843 FAX # 978-7223 FAX # 296-5800 $CLASS,MonAd,AlbemarleCounty PUBLIC NOTICE\qcr\ Albemarle County\qcr\ Board of Supervisors\qcr\ May 3, 1995\qcr\ ...pursuant to Virginia Code Sections 33.1-156, etal, notice is hereby given that the Board of county Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does intend to abandon a public road not in the state Highway System beginning at the common intersection of state Route 664 and the southernmost common boundary on state Route 664 of Tax Map 19, Parcel 29A, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, thence in a northeasterly direction along the common boundary of said Tax Map 19, Parcel 29A, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, to the southernmost point of Tax Map 19, Parcel 290, thence continuing in a northeasterly direction on the common boundary of Tax Map 19, Parcel 290, and Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, to a point where Tax Map 19, Parcel 290, Tax Map 19, Parcel 29C, and Tax Map 20, Parcel 6A, all intersect. Thence in a northwesterly direction along the common boundary line of Tax Map 19, Parcel 290, and Tax Map 20, Parcel 6A, to Tax Map 19, Parcel 32C, where said road ends.\qlr\ ...A public hearing on the abandonment will be held on May 3, 1995, at 10:00 a.m., in Meeting Room #7, Second Floor, County Office Building, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, virginia.\qlr\ ...Public comments are invited at this time.\qlr\ ...By Order of the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virgin- ia. \qlr\ ...Reasonable accommodations will be provided to persons with disabilities, if requested. Please call 296-5827.\qlr\ Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC\qlr\ Purchase Order No. A-544 Bill to: Albemarle County Account Number 204066 Date: April 12, }995 ~ate Run: Apri\jl7 and April 2V995 * * * Y~~/-1/Jf',f'§ /~.¿7¡:'9I.~, .....,~~'~ ";~,-~"-' MaYa. .6 ' ...Pur8UaI"t tøVl~ Còde I~ 33.1-'56. ..,:L~ S æ1hat.,. aowu of' C~ ~of~ =-~~,:¡ not in the State HighWaY SyI~1Ing at \hili c0m- mon ' .õf Sliltl Rø\lte ,864 and U. IOUthemmoat cammontlC!undalY. on State Route e&4!11 Tax Map 19. p,r- ceI'2IIA.andTax Map 19. Par- 011290. ,~ In a~ ñorIt1- eaaterly' dlrecllo, n, -'Ona' the, coJM1l,)l:l boundarY of IIId Tax- Map 19. P8rc:eI 2JA. and Tax Map 19. PetOII '2IC liD the lOUtS !.'!"~ øoIntof Tax Map . rw>i'" 290. __ c:onI\fIU- ~ In; ,In a ñõiítièutedy d1f-=-on ~ onthecommonbaU.-,yofTax j- Map,19. Pan:el29D.Ii:i;Ø' Tax , ,. Map 19. Parcel 2IC. <::rrJ"".ú'fi--I where Tax . 19, D ............. "J TTaII "'1>1~~ aC. and ' ex Map 3)........... SA. all irí.- aect. 'JhenC:8 in a~ dlreèl\On aIonO the c:omrJIOn bOundalYKne of Tax Map~ 19. ~tI 290. and "('IX Me.P. 20. ParCel6A.IøTax MIl) 19. Patcel 32<'. .e aaId road endS· ...,. public heel'inton the aban- doninent will be fíe1d orl May 9. 1~5, ~ 10:00 a.m.. in Meeting Room". Second Floor. County OffIce ,Building. 401 Mcintire Riled. ,PhartotwSViIIe. VIrginia. ...PublIC comments are Invited atthlll\me· ...By Older of the Board of County 'IION of Albe- marle Coun . Virginia. acco'--"atl tit .. RlI'_on& \ ~I5 ~~~~~. ~~- ...pursuánt ~ Virginia Code Sectionll 33.1-156. etal. no\lce is hereby gyen that the Board of County Su~illOrs of Albe- marle County. Virginia. doeS in- tend to abañdOn a public road not In the SIB'" HlghWBY System beginning at the com- mon inter&8ction o. State Route 664 and the southernmost common boundarY' on ,SIBte Route 664 of tax Map 19. Par- cel 29A. and Tax MaP 19. Par- cel 29C. thence in a north- easterly direction along the common boundary of saíd Tax Map 19. Parcel 29.... and Tax Map 19. Parcel 29C. 10 the southemmost point 01 Tax MaP 19. Parcel29D. th8f1Ce continuo ing In a northeasterly direction on the common bounilary of Tax Map 1.9. Parcel 29D. and Tax MaP 19. Parcel 29C. to a point whel'e Tax Map 19. Parcel29D. Tax Meþ 19. Parcel 29C. end Tax. ,Map 2O.,ParcelSA. a,l/lnter- aect. '1fIenCØ in a nortt1W8ster!Y ~. alOng the common hðURcI8rY !!M 01 Tax MaP 19. Pèiêèl290. and Tax Map 20. ~""" Per~6A. ,ID Tax MaP 19, Par- cel s2C. wt*e laid rôed endI· ...It. public hl8ri1'1G on the aban- donment will be h.Id on May.3. 1995.at 10:00 Lm., In MèèIInII RDom.7. SëCond F\9Øf. county ()IIIcè BuIlCllnllo «11 Mclnti" Road.~' Vifa\nlL ...PubIIC ~ are lnvlted at 1\is lime. ...By ()rdef of the Boafd of eounty Sù~t..ol AIbe- ~ . .....- 53 ¡^it? ';<.:) COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Y'-~4-/5 f7.5:¿fft?~, -;;i'!--y EXECUTIVE SUMMARY {1]ay 1 /CJ;Ð(J AGENDA TITLE: Route 664 Public Road Abandonment AGENDA DATE: March 1, 1995 ITEM NUMBER' ¿Î/)^ : -'1,1.-/ (::i, i") ACTION: INFORMATION: SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREQUEST: Request to schedule a public hearing for Route 664 Public Road Abandonment. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: X INFORMA TION: STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Wade, Cilimberg, Keeler REVIEWED BY: A IT ACHMENTS: BACKGROUND: Mr. Richard E. Carter has requested the County of Albemarle abandon a public road beginning at the intersection of Route 664 to its end. Mr. Carter and his guests are the only known users of this road. DISCUSSION: The public road Mr. Carter has requested to be abandoned was apparently dedicated as such many years ago. Staff could not find any evidence that this public road was ever part of the state or county maintained system. Attachments A and B show the original and latest plat and requested road abandonment alignment. The request does not affect the use of the 50' road easement. The road proposed to be abandoned does not have any historical significance or does it negatively impact any historical property. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of road abandonment request after public hearing to be held on AprilS, 1995. 95.027 ~,-- . Œ®ŒßWU: ) r~""-'--"'"---'--' .231R) . ATTACHMENT A --'~,' \~. .. .ç .'."~/· ~)~"w ," ',4 r:' 5'(2 rAcl335 ,!:¡¿'" \ .\1 ";'1 " .; ,r: ,:-,11 ~:.l!; ..~" H- It'.'" J'.t '. S ('9ft ~..,.' .9.... I,Q.l .,, .( trl' ~.t;.:.....'£ tb_~ ('(1 PLAT SHOWING A SURVEY AND DIVISION OF PROPERTY OF TED TUCKER DESIGNA TED AS PARCEL 29A, TAX MAP /9 NEAR EARLYSVILLE ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE.' I" = 200' MA Y 25,/912 S J,ø.¡t: .'," It t:6 ('C' i().!"·_''; .....;"1. ~.f ~..: .; .f.:' r" ~'./.l ./"'[" J9../ ,.: :;,' .,qO(lf.'t= i 4/,'" .,J.,J .~.Ior. f Rt!9f1.~1 \ \ NOTE Trocls A and Core sub¡ecllo R/W w,lnln 15 feel 01 Eosl boundary. \' .18°58 ~'f'l .!:'j ",.. ':J/O.~9'¿,"·£ ".'9.90 S ¿-8" JJ '0'''< 422.20 fC ..J,'.I5 .oF _ ,6r. .J../ ~ ~f! R,r.~. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \. "\ \ ~ \ \ TRACT C 39.69 Ac. REFER. 08 264p 518 (Plo¡) S 49°/42; :; 2T1.99 SJ4",4'S4"" .~ JO$.40 N ló04,',j"E 68'00 1f),'J 50? L II t. Ca/llmlt' Non,ycII" 498 !H Iron ~...........,~ J)lþ";'.~'" Ir .":;1:,,:' t.\ ¡ .' ~ t;~ k..;è. "1 ~ "j . - _' 'f ~ .; '.t. ' 1 \';.' , J -. I., J¡' 10. " ~ ~"'-. . .",) _........ -,,-"'- SJ4"'4'S4 " ...s- 1'0.00 I'"~ ;'ØIf;· ,.{. k TRACT B 8./2 Ac. .. . ,.~ ~ " ,JR.1CT A 6;33Ac: ,~ Sq'ð 's2~ ^ '21.401 ";', .~, :) ~J ,j /' .;,\ .:~ ~. ::;." ~:~ '. . , .1' WILLIAM S ROUDABUSH, JR. CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR ) r'I./¡" ......, /-t-' ,'''' 1 . 9D09iJ.~ 4 A ~~ . J',.::::.,., :~, __t;:~ "0 ~ 'g p' :~ .:.~~-~._. '~' '" THE 'BOUNDARY INFORMATION ON THIS PLAT IS NOT CERTIFIED. THE LOCATIONS OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE VERIFIED BY FIELD RUN SURVEY OF BOUNDARY MARKERS FOUND ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY DECP:8ER 21, 1994, SEE BOUNDARY SURVEY BY WM. S, ROUDABUSH, JR.: D.8. 512 P. 335 SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES WITHIN HUD FLOOD ZONE C. (NOT A FlOOD HAZARD AREA) ONE STORY BRICK -t.J1, ~þ..~' \C) \'~' .,./""'/ ATTACHMENT B .,./ .,./ .,./ .,./ .,./ .,./ ./" , 1......--.......- T.M, 20 PAR. 6A ..' ................ DETAIL: 1" = 60' LINE TABLE TRACTS A &: C ARE SUBJECT TO R/W WITHIN IS' or EAST BOUNDARY. ----------------------------- 0.0. N 65'53'20' E bo. S 15'14'14' '" co. S 09'24'19' '" do. S 71'28'45' '" eo. S 60'48'27' '" fa. S 31'48'37' '" 90. S 02'24'38' '" ha. S 28'58'49' E 10. S 49'14'22' '" 280.50 155.23 183.91 108.73 165.00 66.00 53.84 225.00 271.99 .,~:....:.. ..... ....',. .'", ...... ...;';,.>-~',i.~ .t:...t... t À-i n .;:"·h ,.";"~ .. ~'~ v '.j ,¡'- ': ~~ i"1 ...... ,/.", {.. "\ .VO'" 0 ()10"':'l::"" .y .. .',.. \ 1" .(, (C.'. ~~.' .<:',;,~: . -~ ~~ ,:j GARY M. WHELAN ~::\ì ~ ~I.) l cV;' '.~ 'd No. 14.3 ~. & ( .. ~ t/ ., l~ " t) " <:'\. " . \ I A ,,0,";:: ¡ '\~:.\ /!//) c' U r~ 'J ç. ;';.L./ : ,:'~~::"":¿:.;'-'';-' _:<~-~','~..:-'~Y ,I ¡ . . PLAT SHOWING PHYSICAL SURVEY T.M. 19 PAR. 29C PARCEL 29D ON TAX MAP 1 9 ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" = 300' DECEMBER 21, 1994 Cary N. lYhelan Lana Surveyor CharJottesvt'lle, Vi'rgt'nt'a o 100 200 300 ~--.J SCALE IN tEET 600 ..., 13559 D-EU 't " February 3, 1995 County of Albemarle Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Board: PETITION TO ABANDON POSSIBLE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY The undersigned, being all of the owners of property in Albemarle County, Virginia, more particularly described as Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, hereby petition the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors to abandon any possible public rights to the use of the existing old road as shown on the attached surveys. The road to be abandoned is shown from State Route 664 to its end on a plat of William S. Roudabush, Jr., Certified Land Surveyor, dated May 25, 1972, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia, in Deed Book 512, page 335, a copy of which is attached hereto, and said road is shown as it crosses said Tax Map 19, Parcel 29D, to its end on a physical survey of Gary M. Whelan, Land Surveyor, dated December 21, 1994, said physical survey attached hereto also. A further description is attached hereto. There is no evidence that this road was ever maintained with public funds, either as a County road or a State secondary road, nor is there evidence that this road has been utilized by any persons other than the owners of this property or their guests. This petition does not affect the rights of petitioners in the use of the 50' road easement as shown on plat recorded in Deed Book 512, page 335. The road to be abandoned is the same road as was condemned by the County of Albemarle as described in Minute Book 15, pages 235 and 251, and as shown on plats recorded in Deed Book 307, page 584, and Deed Book 694, page 358. SMEDLEY D. BUTLER, III and SUSAN L. BUTLER ::d!¿(¡; by Counsel Attorney for Petitioners Taylor, Zunka, Milnor & Carter, Ltd. 414 Park Street, P.O. Box 1567 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 a-e\butler.abd ~ ~ . 1ft. David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 296·5800 Charles S Martm Rlvannd Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins WhIt£> Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. ScoltsVÎlle Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller February 3, 1995 Mr. Richard E. Carter 414 Park Street PO Box 1567 Charlottesville, VA 22902 Dear Mr. Carter: This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter requesting the Board to abandon State Route 664. Your request is being forwarded to the Director of Planning and Community Development so that he can provide a staff report for the Board to review. This item has been scheduled for discussion by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on March 1, 1995. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m., in Meeting Room #7, Second Floor of the County Office Building. You or your representative should be present at the meeting. Someone from the Highway Department will also be present. If you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, E~~£!Çl~MC EWC:mms cc: V. Wayne Cilimberg Ronald S. Keeler Larry W. Davis r- * Printed on recycled paper David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596 (804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 972-4060 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miner FROM: To Whom Addressed Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC ~ ~ MEHO TO: DATE: May 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Ordinance Adopted by the Board on May 3, 1995 Attached for your use is a copy of an ordinance which was adopted by the Board on May 3, 1995: (1) An ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 9, Fire Protec- tion, Article III, FIREWORKS, of the Code of Albemarle in section 9-19, sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain locations. This amendment sets forth that it is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, organization or group to sell, offer for sale, store, display, manufacture, possess or discharge any fireworks within 100 feet of any gasoline pump, propane distribution tank, or other inflammable liquid distribution pump or apparatus, except in a fully enclosed building where fireworks are permitted for such sale or use. A description of a "fully enclosed building" is also provid- ed. EWC:len Attachments (1) cc: Rick Huff Carl Pumphrey Jesse Hurt Stephen Helvin Municipal Code * Printed on recycled paper ORDINANCE NO. 95-9(1) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 9, FIRE PROTECTION, ARTICLE III, FIREWORKS, OF THE CODE OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of Albe- marle County, Virginia, that Chapter 9, Fire Protection, Article III, Fireworks, is hereby amended and reordained by amending section 9-19, Sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain locations, as follows: Sec. 9-19. Sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain loca- tions. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, organization or group to sell, offer for sale, store, display, manufacture, possess or discharge any fireworks within one hundred (100) feet of any gasoline pump, propane distribution tank, or other inflammable liquid distribution pump or apparatus, except in a fully enclosed building where fireworks are permitted for such sale or use. Fully enclosed building shall not be construed to include any outdoor stands or other similar structures that have been set up to sell, offer for sale, store or display any fireworks. * * * * * I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on May 3, 1995. cf~ o~ýLC7isors FAX TRANSMITTAL TO Dana Hubbard FROM L E Neher CO Daily Progress DEPT Classified CO Albemarle County PHONE # 296-5843 FAX # 296-5800 FAX # 978-7223 $CLASS ,MonAd, AlbemarleCounty PUBLIC NOTICE\qcr\ Albemarle County\qcr\ Board of Supervisors\qcr\ May 3, 1995\qcr\ ...Notice is hereby given that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors will conduct a public hearing on May 3, 1995, at 10:10 A.M. in Meeting Room #7, Second Floor, County Office Building, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia on an ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 9, Fire Protection, Article III, FIREWORKS, of the Code of Albemarle in Section 9-19, sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain locations. This amendment will set forth that it is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, organization or group to sell, offer for sale, store, display, manufacture, possess or discharge any fireworks within 100 feet of any gasoline pump, propane distri- bution tank, or other inflammable liquid distribution pump or apparatus, except in a fully enclosed building where fireworks are permitted for such sale or use. A description of a "fully enclosed building" is also provid- ed.\q1r\ ...A complete copy of the wording of this ordinance amendment may be obtained from the Clerk, Fourth Floor, County Office Building, McIntire Road, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or by calling 296-5843.\qlr\ ...Public comments are invited at this time.\qlr\ ...By Order of the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virgin- ia.\qlr\ ...Reasonable accommodations will be provided to persons with disabilities, if requested. Please call 296-5827.\qlr\ Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC\qlr\ Purchase Order No. A-545 Bill to: Albemarle County Account Number 204066 Date: April 12! 3-995 / Date Run: Apri~7 and April~, 1995 * * * * I ?~ ~/-1 /?'?,..=r /~¿?/4"~' ORDINANCE NO. ~ #74/,øf?~ 7~ ¿;;-f/tJl5': 3~Ç DRAFT: April 1 0, 1995 ~,AI'-.?~ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 9, FIRE PROTECTION, ARTICLE III, FIREWORKS, OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA. BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 9, Fire Protection, Article III, Fireworks, is hereby amended and reordained by amending section 9-19, Sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain locations, as follows: Sec. 9-19. Sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain locations. No person shall sell, offer for sale, store, display or discharge any firC';;orks in any filling station or on any premises 'vvhere gasoline or other inflammable liquids arc stored or dispensed. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, organization or group to selL offer for sale, store, display, manufacture, possess or discharge any fireworks within one hundred (100) feet of any gasoline pump, propane distribution tank, or other inflammable liquid distribution pump or apparatus, except in a fully enclosed building where fireworks are permitted for such sale or use. Fully enclosed building shall not be construed to include any outdoor stands or other similar structures that have been set up to selL offer for sale, store, or display any fireworks. 9-19.WPD No permit issued pursuant to section 9-12 shall be transferable. (Code 1967, § 10 -11) Sec. 9-18. Disposal of unused fireworks after public display. Any fireworks remaining unfired at the end of any public display shall be immediately disposed of in a way safe for that particular type of fireworks. (Code 1967, § 10 - 12 ) 6ec. 9-19. Sale, discharge, etc., prohibited in certain locations. No peL5011 sllc:ill ~ell, offeL f01: sale, sto1.e, disf'lay OL discllà.Lge àl1Y fi.LeWud.s "-11 à!!Y filli119 slat.i.ol1 01. 011 à!!Y fJ1.elLll.SeS wlle1.e gàsolille 01. otLel. i!!flàll'lllàble liquids aLe stol.ed 01. di spellsed. No Derson shall sell. offer for sale. store. disDlayor discharGe any fireworks outside any aasoline station or other prpmises wherp O,~_l :~~_~r other inflammable liquids are stored or disDensed. nor shall any Derson sell. offer for sale. store. disDlay or discharge any fireworks from any outdoor stand or other temporary or permanent structure which is located outside any qasoline station or other premises where Gasoline or other inflammable liquids are stored or disDensed. In addition. no person shall sell. offer for sale. store. display or discharge any fireworks within fifty (50) feet of any gasoline station or other Dremises where Gasoline or other inflammable liquids are stored or disDensed. or within fifty (50) feet of any outdoor 20 stand or other temporary or permanent structure which is located outside any gasoline station or other premises where gasoline or other inflammable liauids are stored or dispensed. (Code 1 967, § 1 0 - 1 3 ) Sec. 9-20. Seizure and destruction of certain fireworks. Any law enforcement officer arresting any person for the violation of any provision of this article shall seize any article mentioned in section 9-10 which is in the possession of or under the control of the person so arresled, and shall hold the same until final disposition of any crimlnal proceedings against such person. If a judgment of CU:1V1. 'Ii is entered against such persons, the court shall, : I. f( 1 i : ion to any other penalty imposed, order destruction of such al\ ¡cles upon expiration of the t1me allowed for appeal of l3\wh judgment of conviction. (Code 1967, § 10 - 14 ) For state law basi,; of th1S sec:tic;:., of Va., Section 59.1-143. Article IV. Burning of Brush, etc. Sec. 9-21. Purpose. The Durpose of this article 1S to protect the public health. safety and welfare bv regulating open files wllllin the county to achieve and maintain, to the greatest deglef.~ prdcticable, levels of air aualitv that will provide comfort and convenlence to the peoDle of the county while promoting economic and social development. The regulations provided herein are intended to 21 TO Dana Hubbard CO Dailv Proqress DEPT Classified FAX # 978-7223 FAX TRANSMITTAL FROM L E Neher CO Albemarle County PHONE # 296-5843 FAX # 296-5800 $CLASS,MOnAd,AlbemarleCounty PUBLIC NOTICE\qcr\ Albemarle County\qcr\ Board of Supervisors\qcr\ May 3, 1995\qcr\ ...Notice is hereby given that the Albemarle Board of County Supervisors will conduct a public hearing on WEDNESDAY MORNING of May 3, 1995, at 10:30 A.M. in Meeting Room #7, Second Floor, County Office Building, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia on the following petition: CPA-95-1. Mill Creek. To change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for 80.34 ac from Industrial Service to Low Density Residential for property immediately N of Southern Parkway on N sd of Mill Creek residential develop- ment & S of I-64. TM76M1,Ps10&10B. Scottsville Dist.\qlr\ ...Anyone desiring further information about the above petition, please contact the County Department of Planning and Community Development, Second Floor, County Office Building, or telephone 296-S823.\qlr\ ...Reasonable accommodations will be provided to persons with disabilities, if requested. Please call 296-S827.\qlr\ Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC\qlr\ Purchase Order No. A-546 Bill to: Albemarle County Account Number 204066 Date: April 12, ~5 Date Run: Apri\l17 and April 24, 1995 * * * * ~ ~ /",ç /f?.ø.:f:' /~'p?/4'~ David P. Bowerman Charlottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 (804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Rivimnð Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins While Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scoltsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Mi\ler April 11, 1995 Craig Builders of Albemarle, Inc. PO Box 6156 Charlottesville, VA 22906 RE: CPA-95-1 Mill Creek Dear Sir: This letter is to notify you that your above-referenced petition has been rescheduled for public hearing. The Board of Supervi- sors will conduct its public hearing on this item on WEDNESDAY MORNING, MAY 3, 1995, at 10:30 A.M. The meeting will be held in Meeting Room #7, Second Floor, County Office Building, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia. YOU OR YOUR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT THIS MEETING. If you have any questions or concerns about this schedule, please do not hesitate to contact me. EWC:mms Sincerely, ~lPk-~t~ cc: V. Wayne Cilimberg Ron A. Lilley Larry W. Davis * Printed on recycled paper ~-/~ ~þ /Þ: ¡Ç.:?~ ;3§þ COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Dept. of Planning & Community Development 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 (804) 2%-5823 UI1' !V!~ ~ n '(¡t"¡h ~.' 1;:'V\J i . ,,~ . A..., \..j¡- ···_____.,·~..,"....c_....,.... March 3D, 1995 Craig Builders of Albemarle, Inc P. O. Box 6156 Charlottesville, VA 22906 RE: CPA-95-01 Mill Creek Dear Sir: The Albemarle County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March 28, 1995, unanimously recommended approval of the above-noted petition to the Board of Supervisors. Please be advised that the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors will review this petition and receive public comment at their meeting on Mav 10, 1995. Any new or additional infonnation regarding your application must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at least seven days prior to your scheduled hearing date. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~¡~ Ronald A. Lilley Senior Plannr cc: Ella cjrey Amelia McCulley Jo Higgins STAFF PERSON: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: BOARD OF SUPERVSIORS: RON LILLEY MARCH 28, 1995 MAY 10, 1995 CP A 95-01 Mill Creek Industrial Area (Craig Builders) Applicant's Proposal: The applicant proposes to extend the Mill Creek Residential Development to the north into an area of approximately 80 acres currently designated for Industrial Development, providing approximately 150 single family homes. Petition: To change the land use designation of approximately 80 acres from Industrial Service to Low Density Residential (1 to 4 dwelling units per acre). This area, encompassing parcels 10 and lOB on Tax Map 76MI, is located on the north side of Southern Parkway and on the south side ofInterstate 64, about 1/4 mile west of Avon Street extended, in the Scottsville Magisterial District (see Attachment A). Please note that this request is before the Planning Commission at this time rather than as part of the full review of the Comprehensive Plan at the direction of the Board of Supervisors. Cbaracter oftbe Area: This site is in Neighborhood 4 of the Urban Area and is mostly wooded. The surrounding area contains a wide variety of land uses, with Interstate 64 immediately to the north and the University Corporate Centre (undeveloped, but designated for Industrial Service uses) across the Interstate, Light Industrial uses to the east, residential uses (including existing Mill Creek) to the south and west. Biscuit Run, with associated floodplain and steep slopes, runs through the western portion of the site, and an unnamed creek runs along the eastern edge of the site. Plannio&: and ZOOiD&: History: This area has been included in the Urban Area since the original 1971 Comprehensive Plan, though that Plan did not initially designate a particular use category for this area. The 1977 Plan designated this area for Low Density Residential use and Open Space along the streams. The 1982 Plan designated the area for Industrial use. It is staff's understanding that this change in designation resulted from a perception that there was an overabundance of commercially zoned property and a need for Industrial property. The original zoning was Business (B-1). Part of this site is encompassed by the Mill Creek Planned Unit Development, approved in 1986, showing this part of the PUD for light industrial use. The larger portion of the site was zoned Light Industrial before the Mill Creek PUD rezoning. C:\WP51\PCACT.FRM 1 STAFF COMMENT: The primary issues for this amendment request are: - effect on Industrial Service land inventory - the need for additional residential land inventory - the appropriateness of residential uses on the site - the suitability of the area for other uses - the likely impacts of residential development to public facilities These will be considered in turn, along with comments on the applicant's application text. Industrial Service Inventory: As noted the Industrial Service designation has been in place since the early 1980s. The amount of land presently designated for Industrial Service in Neighborhood 4 is about 385 acres. Of that acreage, about 130 acres are presently used for Industrial Service type uses, and about 255 acres are undeveloped. It is unknown what the demand for these 255 acres for industrial use might be. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan is currently under review and is scheduled for Board adoption by the end of 1995. Therefore, analysis of this area for continued designation as Industrial Service within the scope of the full Plan has not been completed. However, the inventory of Industrial Service land for the entire County has been preliminarily studied and is considered more than adequate in terms of acreage needs for the planning period of the Comprehensive Plan. The projections of employment in the Industrial Service-type sectors have been lowered considerably since the previous Comprehensive Plan update, based on national trends of industrial employment, leading to smaller inventory needs. The latest projections are included as Attachment C. It should be noted that, while current projections based on employment indicate a need for a small additional amount of industrial land, factors other than employment could affect the land needs and other non-residential land needs exist, so the present inventory of industrial land should not necessarily be largely redesignated. It can be difficult to replace un-designated industrial land, so careful consideration of the suitability of land requested for such changes for industrial and/or other non- residential uses needs to be given. An assessment of the quality of the various sites in the available inventory is underway, but has not been completed. The assessment is based on access to major roads, utility availability, topography and other physical characteristics, zoning, and nearby uses. Though not completed, preliminary indications are that parcels subject to this request would not rate very well compared to other parcels in the inventory due to access and topographic constraints. Staff opinion is that there would very likely be sufficient inventory of Industrial Service land in the balance of the County, including a reasonable amount in the Neighborhood 4 area, if this 80 acre portion were to be removed. C:\WP51\PCACT.FRM 2 Residential Land Inventory: As part of the current Comprehensive Plan update, a need for more residential land has been identified. At least part of that need will require an expansion of the Growth Areas. Some of the residential land needs could be provided for by a redesignation of non-residential land such as proposed in this request. Site Suitability for Residential Uses: Given its proximity to the Interstate and to existing and potential industrial uses, the site is not ideal for residential uses, but with adequate buffering, residential use could be reasonable. The Comprehensive Plan designates some other areas near highways and industrial lands as low density residential, so such a combination is not unprecedented. As the applicant points out, the topography and access is better suited to residential development than to industrial development. The infrastructure to support residential development is reasonably available to the site. This site lies north of the Southern Parkway, which is planned to connect Avon Street to 5th Street. The connector would physically split this area from the rest of the Mill Creek residential development. Designation and development of this requested residential area should continue to accommodate the connector road alignment. Site Suitability for Non-Residential Uses: As noted earlier, there are some considerable topographic and access constraints for development of this site for industrial use. Access to the Interstate presently requires travel southward on Avon Street extended, then northward along Route 20, a total of about 4.2 miles, or northward along Avon Street, then through local City streets not well-suited to industrial-type traffic to either 5th Street or Route 20 and southward to the Interstate. The access constraints could be alleviated considerably if the Southern Parkway link to 5th Street Extended or the link from Avon Street Extended to Route 20 were completed, thereby improving the potential for good industrial use of this site, but the chances for and timing of completion of those links is unclear at this time. The topographic and access characteristics pose difficulties for other non-residential uses as well. The applicant has provided an engineer's assessment that the grading necessary to develop this site as one lot would probably not be feasible. However, there may be ~ome non-residential uses that do not require very good highway access or large sites, necessitating extensive grading at this site. The Planning Department has received comments about the desirability of designating land available for uses like contractor storage yards, self-storage warehousing, etc., that do not require prime industrial or commercial locations and would not be priced based on the wide range of uses presently allowed under industrial zoning. It is possible that this site could be suitable for such needs. However, the applicant notes that this site has garnered very little interest for any industrial uses since it has been on the C:\WPS1\PCACT.FRM 3 market, so it appears that access and topographic limitations for industrial uses are also inhibiting its potential for such variations on the industrial designation. Impacts to Public Facilities: Theoretically, a low density residential designation for this 80 acres could generate 320 new dwelling units. The applicant indicates an intention of providing approximately 150 homes, probably as a mix of single family detached and single family attached units. Based on average household size and occupancy rate, this development would generate approximately 350 persons. Consideration of the impacts of the development needs to be balanced against considerations of the County's growth management policy and other County policies. Since population growth is expected, the impacts to public facilities from growth within the Growth Area need to be evaluated in light of the possible impacts from growth outside of the Growth Area. Schools Based on typical student generation factors, this development would generate up to 73 elementary school students, 36 middle school students, and 42 high school students. Currently, this development would be served by Cale Elementary School, Walton Middle School, and Western Albemarle High School. All three schools currently have enrollment exceeding their capacity. System-wide, there are similar capacity constraints at may schools that are being addressed by the School Board and Board of Supervisors. Water/Sewer The Albemarle County Service Authority has indicated that adequate water and sewer capacity exists to support the proposed development. Transportation Based on average traffic generations, 150 single family homes would typically generate about 1500 vehicle trips per day, all feeding onto Avon Street extended. While Avon Street is curren~ly considered close to its full capacity, the level of traffic that could be expected if the site were developed industrially, as presently zoned, would be significantly higher, in the range of3000 to 4000 trips per day. Other Public Facilities Services and facilities such as Fire and Rescue, Police, Libraries, and Parks should not be significantly affected by a development of the proposed size and location. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Criteria The applicant's text (Attachment D) provides a discussion of how this request relates to the adopted criteria for consideration of Comprehensive Plan Amendments. In general, staff opinion 4 is that the amendment criteria are adequately addressed. As noted earlier, the fulfillment of the objective of promoting a variety of safe, sanitary and affordable housing types would probably require a substantial amount of buffering from adjoining uses, and the applicant's contention that the site is not suitable for a large industrial development should be weighed against the site's potential for several smaller industrial sites, though even that potential appears limited. SUMMARY: In summary, this proposal is in line with the Comprehensive Plan goal of containing the vast majority of residential development within designated growth areas and low-density residential appears to be an appropriate land use for the property. The property appears to have limited usefulness for Industrial Service uses and limited usefulness for other non-residential uses. Staff opinion is that there would still be a sufficient inventory ofIndustrial Service land in the County and Neighborhood 4 if this 80 acre portion were taken out of the inventory. There appears to be adequate infrastructure available to support a residential use of this property, and with an adequate level of buffering from adjoining uses to the north and east, the site appears reasonably suited for residential development. Therefore, staff finds that this request has merit for amendment into the Comprehensive Plan. Recommended Action: Approval. ---------------- A TT ACHMENTS: A - Location Map wI Zoning B - BOS Resolution ofIntent to Amend Plan C - Non-Residential Land Use Projections D - Applicant's Text A:\CP A950 1.RPT 5 (! (ATTACHMENT Ai \ Page 1 \ 61 iEMARLE COUNTY i ' /. , I· , eo ..........., ""1g:¡-. '\. ""- JJ~ ; -.....¡,c ~.,. III ~ r! ~ I ~ ,;!4 I' \: ~ .; I "" \.../ ¡.......r J ~ L/fl' ~~ I ~ . / I ..Æ, ~ r I T r ,.. ..- J I ., \J -, ~ , , \ r ! T ~ ~ -~ I :; to _ 7 ~ " ...... ~ a 'l (:1,' 4&) , (. 44 , . -À\15. ! ( ~>-'7 ~ ~'~ r ,.~ ..., .."., I : ¡.' fA ~ ""'"-. .. ìll ð~ 5 .. ~~~.Jøt.. ~~ttC .... ~LEJ" DIST. ~ · ~ ~ A'~ . J II /"" "~.-,-.;;..' .,.,0 , -... ./""'" lrf'..- /1 , -- / II ......... U ,. \. 11/ Il( " ( II If '\ I/S. I I I \. /// .~ /II 7Z ~, 7//t'oII' /// -I ~- '" III I. / ~ ///p / '-....$ ff / /ffi Ø' /,¡l -#-~ I -/': ......... J ---r V \\. "'""--- J .// - ___ .. \ /'- ___ ...././ r - \ f""ooo.... / _ r/./ \. I ~11 Y I ~./../ ___ \. J...... ~I I I ~....~ .............. '"Yer C I ./ ~~(' _a~ .......... r............. ...... --.......; I 7 ,.--;::;.~o\) / ~ .......... I I ~.............. 7 __ .n,,·,^ ........" 7/ ~f ,./ \ -¡::~II ~ ~J"\ \ I '\. \ ., "- ~~ \" \ I ......... J~ '\II ~ ~ \ , :2í .....,.\.-il¡- ..............~ "\ '\ ./1 .' __~ ..' \ '\ Q::l . 1111' ~\ '\ I / ~ ~ _...........~ /' \ ,_ . I/'I ~II _...........~"íI -p". ...." / I ./ I _ ...........~5. "'\. '. I I ,/ ~ ,,/J / f'" ~ n~ CHAALOTTESVILI ~ "" I' 7'" CITY -' \. ,.u I / X/I / / / /~. / / ,'" I / /1 '-. / / / , -._ I / I ... '-../ , '.LIT I 7"-... "^_ T I ........~.. .......~...... ~/ 1 ,-, I ."- VB '\ 0", r'~ I ,."...,,, ~.J' ~;\. ~B , ~ I ~. -'Yf ........::::-... ........ '- 1~ ~ .-,; ~\ '/' --.,. ~.-~.. ,... ""1. I, ~~. _ .'_ :~~_ ~ :It gr II // ~-- - . ",~ . JJ //; ~".t=-- - -:'.: .! ,.'/' - :..L--:=:--::-;.. - - s:==: :\;' -=:;::=:TŠ-riF'""'i£t16NIU~ ii .0 J ..=-- -'-c_·;~~CJ I'~II ~~J~ ~~~ I ~'1 If,,,,,,,,, IJ)..' '/ ~'''hIÐ''''~ '....,... -1/, ,/j ~ $ _ S£CT1Ofo nfllla 11[121 $$ . - ~ - ~ III ~ "' ~.....7 .. 'IJ.'Y .,'~ .t':f.. 31' ~~ rFJ9JlB~ ~~~~.. ~~ Vi' - ~ ff-4 i .ß.".!:~.'!U_4t.T DI.5T. . - ) ;:;- - -..:::. J~. '-- ~ ":::.. /Il./......... . I.. ........ ~ ! ( ./I..~ ~ LI.. , '" " 1\ I \. , , I """ I " 'I \ \ \ " ........ r, \. , / 1 I I ~ ...... ........ . ./ ......... ......... ........... ~ t' -, . ..,_,--.!f! .""'f i 31 ~ . '4" . ;¡ ~... oÞ'~ i47~ /:LA ,- ._~,t" ~. ..." r¡¡p¡ N A ,-::; ~"'\ ..... / nCT__, 'A ' '/~ MLL / ..,.. (/, /~ 10 - PRlr~ - fà ""::--=11 . -C::]I ~. '-..... ~ '-.... ......... .j' PUD. ... R2 / ~ MI~L CÅEEK ^ R16 )~, ".,,,.,,111 ~~'''I''''''" - ¡fUEL MILLER. SCOTTSVILLE fJACK JOUETT DISTRICTS 00' SECTION 76 SÇAU IN.... PAGE NUMBER 24 bcwc.......· .,.. . .:.. 91 RIVANNA A~ SCOTTSVILLE 01 · . ¡ATTACHMENT 81 RESOLUTION OF INTENT BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, does hereby state its intent to amend the Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan to change the zoning of Tax Map 76Ml, Parcels 10 and lOB from Industrial to Residential; and FURTHER requests the Albemarle County Planning Commission to hold a public hearing on said intent to amend the Comprehensive Plan, and does request that the Planning Commission send its recommendation to this Board at the earliest possible date. ...., :.",.., I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a true, correct copy of a Resolution of Intent adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia at a regular meeting held on January 4, 1995. cl~!!±fi~s ALBEMARLE GOl JTY \ Page 2 , 2A 2B ~ ~Soû)- ...........:1,(',,'" ~"Þ"-9 ''-....''"'''..,.. .'---.. 130._ "t.~. -':toc MILL CREEK INDUSTRIAL PAR K PARCELS II THRU 24 D8 1102' Pq 724 WILLOUGHBY PLATS 0 e. 464 PII· 45 O.B. 476 PIIs.IO a 17 .. ZMA-94-25 Craig Builders zoo SCAL[ I" fur zoo 400 600 600 SCOTTSVILLE DISTRICT SECTION 76M(I) IATTACHMENT C 1985 1990 2000 2010 2015 EMPLOYMENT 1 EMPLOYMENT3 EMPLOYMENT4 EMPLOYMENT4 EMPlOYMENT4 INDUSTRIAL Manufacturing 6,273 6,365 6,365 6,365 6,365 Transportation 435 393 428 466 487 Wholesale Trade 538 500 566 641 673 TOTAL INDUSTRIAL 7.246 7,258 7359 7,472 7.525 Building Square Ft 1,961,604 2,057,604 2,082,597 2,114,576 2,129,575 Developed Acres 2 510 522 528 536 540 Undeveloped Acres 1,109 1,381 Square Feet/Acre 3,846 3,942 Square Feet/E~loyee 271 283 COffŒRCIAl Construction 1,124 2,213 2,505 2,836 2,995 F inanee 1,168 1,628 1,861 2,127 2,268 Services 4,067 4,543 5,792 7,885 8,273 Retail Trade 3,105 4,576 5,331 6,211 6,724 TOTAL C(J4MERCIAL 9,464 12,960 15,489 19,059 20,260 Bui lding Square Ft 3,551,855 4,096,155 4,894,524 6,022,644 6,402,160 Developed Acres 545 621 742 913 971 Undeveloped Acres 544 405 Square Feet/Acre 6,515 6,596 SQUare Feet/Employee 375 316 1 E~loyment for 1985 from corrected Virginia E~loyment commission data. 2 Undeveloped acreage is .that acreage estimated to be vacant and developable. This acreage does not include floodplain and 25X slopes. 3 E~loyment for 1990 from Virginia E~loyment data, and is not adjusted for pos~ible location reporting errors. 4 Sector growth dates are based on moderate national projections reported in "Industry OUtput E~loyment" Monthly labor Review, (November, 1989): pp 24-41. 2015 projections based on BEA Report (1991) Moderate National projections,(1988-2010). 5 1993 estiNte of vacant developable cOlllßercial land. Sources: Square footage of non-residential land determined by Albemarle County Department of Planning and Community Development. 3-28-95 2 e limit it. VVhat is shown as the cemetery is the existing open area. The detail of that plan starts to give out as you get into that area and it is harder for me to guara# that all the Health Department regulations, etc. , could be met with ease in thosf ' areas. But you could allow them to get into those âreas if you maintained thw'Health Department requirement." Mr. Fritz stressed that he did not bel~eve there w,e any issues of ooncem about the back portion of the property, but he could not say, "with, certainty," that there are none.l 'í> ~ MOTION: Ms. Imhoff moved that SP-94-32 for Free Union Baptist Chþch and Memorial Cemetery be recommended to the Board of Supervisors fOf/itpproval subject to the following conditions: ,l. '.' 1. The cemetery shall be limited to the existing cemetery area ~d that area shown on a plan of the Free Union Baptist Memorial Cemetery west s,Øction dated 4/20/93 and initialed WDF 3/8/95. Use of the area shown as "resé",'d for future cemetery development" shall require amendment of this permit. _~ ,< .< 2. Compliance with all Health Department regulations. ..' Ms. Huckle seconded the motion. The motion pass,a unanimously. ----------------------------------------- f CPA 95-01 Mill Creek - Proposal to amend th,"Comprehensive Plan land use e designation for 80.34 acres from Industrial Service to Low Density Residential. Property located south of 1-64, west of AvoDStreet, north of Mill Creek Subdivision. Mr. Lilley distributed a copy of a resolution of support signed by the President of the Mill Creek Homeowners Association. (This document was later read by Mr. Michael Matthews and is made a part of these minutes as Attachment A.) Mr. Lilley presented the staff report. Staff recommended approval of the request. Ms. Huckle noted that the staff report states that this development should continue to accommodate the connector road alignment. She asked at what' point in the process that requirement should be applied. Mr. Lilley said that the applicant is well aware of the Comp Plan recommendation for the extension of an Avon Stree~h Street Connector. He indicated the time to address this issue would be at tìî.time of the . ~ . rezomng. '-, i;¡;~'~,. Ms. Imhoff wondered if language should be added to the Comp Plan rega " the Southern Connector alignment. Mr. Cilimberg explained that language alre exists in the Comp Plan which calls for "the road to be as shown in the existing plan and that line would not change with this amendment-its just the land use that is above that line." e e 3-28-95 3 In response to Mr. Dotson's question, Mr. Lilley confirmed that this was an applicant initiated request, but one which the Board had directed that the staff process. The applicant. was represented by Ms. Andrea Craig. Her comments included the following: --Mill Creek has provided the County with 10% of the county's affordable housing sales for the last 4 years. --This property is within the designated growth area and at one time was zoned residential. . -The property is not suitable for industrial development because of topographic and access constraints. ·",The price of homes in this development will begin at $90,000. Mr. Blue asked if the applicant had any plans for the road system to cross Biscuit Run. Ms. Craig said, to the best of her knowledge, that possibility has not been discussed. Public comment was invited. Mr. Mike Matthews, President of the Mill Creek Homeowner's Association, addressed the Commission. He read a resolution of support for the application. (See Attachment e A.) There being no further comment, the matter was placed before the Commission. Mr. Nitchmann said he felt this proposal made sense. He noted that this is one of the few develöpments in the County which is addres$ing' the affordable housing issue. He expressed support for the proposal. MOTION: Mr. Nitchmann moved that CPA-95-01 for Mill Creek be recommended to the Board of Supervisors for approval. Ms. Imhoff seconded the motion. Discussion: e Ms. Imhoff had two concerns. She expressed the feeling, as she has in the past. that it is difficult to review Comprehensive Plan amendments while in the midst of the Comp Plan review process. She understood that the Board had directed. that this request be considered, but she felt "at some point, there needs to be a cut-off on amending the Comp Plan while you are working on the Comp Plan because it is had to look at all of this in the bigger picture." She acknowledged that she was familiar with the history of this project and she supported staff's recommendation. Secondly, ~ Resolution J_ I _, -1 ' ..... v /, , -, i __ e Made this ¡.O f¡.. day of March, 1995, by a vote of the Mill Creek Homeowners Association Board of Directors, regarding a proposai to develop a parcel of land immediately adjacent to Mill Creek as described by: Application by Craig Builders of Albemarle to change the designation of a.n Industrial parcel to Residential for the construction of single faff'¡ly dwellings per "Albemarle County CPA-95-1 Mill Creek", commonly known as Mill Creek West. The Mill Creek B08id of Dire:::tors, as elected r~presentatjves of the 212 homeowners of Mill Creek, hereby SUPPO¡·ts the applicant's proposal with the following comment · based on maîerials submitted to the County by the applicant, it our feeling that a residential use of the type proposed is more compatible with the character of our adjoining neighborhood and with this portion of the County than an industrial lIse; · additional traffic is projected by the applicant to be substantially less with the proposed residential use than with an industrial use;· - · as residents of a Craig Builders development, we have a higher degree of confidence in the quality of the project and the approach to development that would be employed by Craig Builders. Mill Creek is the finest development of its type in the area. Craig Builders has exhibited a continuing commitment to assist our organization and our homeowners, and we hope (and expect) that such a commitment to responsible development will also be a part of Mill Creek West. We also hope to see the following characteristics in Mill Creek West: · maximum practical attempts to save as many trees as possible, particularly those that serve as a buffer between subdivisions; .. aesthetically pleasing, safe. and unobtrusive entrance at the Southern Parkway/Gristmill Drive area to serve Mill Creek West. · sensitivity to cu~ r.eighborhood when planning the location of necessary infrastructure requirements and recreational areas. We would rather not see street lights, ¡ig~1ted recreational areas, sewer pump stations. or similar features where they would De visible from our neighborhood. · continued .cooperation with Craig BUilders to explore the com~tJn use of our natural élnd recreationa! areas We would prefer, of course, to see the land remain undeve!cped. We alsc do not look forward to more competitior. for our resales. 'Ne feei it is important, however, that we have a voice in the develo9mem of adjoining prcper'Y, and if development is to take place on this parcel, we fee! that a ~esidentlal development by Crai9 Buiiders is a more responsible and appropriate land use than the current ¡naustriai designation. e Submitted March ..:1-0.-_,1995 ;/1· .... I R .0( th J . rvllcnae. ¡Vial ews, r President -> I .. David P. Bowerman Char!ottesville COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE Office of Board of Supervisors 401 Mcintire Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596 (804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 296-5800 Charles S. Martin Rivanna Charlotte Y. Humphris Jack Jouett Walter F. Perkins White Hall Forrest R. Marshall, Jr. Scottsville Sally H. Thomas Samuel Miller April 11, 1995 BOZZONE, JEFFREY J OR BRANDYAYNE BRASS, INC. CAROLINA BUILDERS CORPORATION CRAIGHURST, ROBERT COCKRELL CRISER, HEIDI E OR BETTY J DIMERCURIO, SALVATORE OR JEAN ROHER DOMINION REAL ESTATE INVESTORS ERIN, INC. FIELDING, EDITH T KOMADA, MICHAEL R OR SONDRA P LEGE, FREDERICK M IV OR TERESA L METE, ROBERT JOHN MILL CREEK INDUSTRIAL LAND TRUST MILL CREEK PHASE TWO PUD HOME MILLER, GEORGE W OR NANCY C MITCHELL, MICHAEL W OR SUSAN K MORTON, MARY E & WILLIAM E MORTON ROBERTS, RANDOLPH R & MARY R SILER, BOBBY LEE & NELLIE B SMITH, CAROL J SPROUSE, DAVID L & MARGIE E TASKEY, WILLIAM S OR MARIE A VIRGINIA LAND TRUST; CHARLES WM HURT WENGER, LEWIS D & ELIZABETH H WILLIAMS, JOSEPHINE K WOOD, MONTE R RE: CPA-95-1 Mill Creek Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is to notify you as an adjacent property owner that the above- referenced petition described as follows: CPA-95-01 Mill Creek - Proposal to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for 80.34 ac from Industrial Service to Low Density Residential. Property, described as Tax map 76M1, Parcels 10 and lOB, is located immediately north of Southern Parkway on the north side of Mill Creek residential development and south of Interstate 64. Scottsville District. This petition has been rescheduled for public hearing. The Board of Supervi- sors will conduct its public hearing on this item on WEDNESDAY MORNING, MAY 3, 1995, at 10:30 A.M. * Printed on recycled paper April 11, 1995 Page 2 The meeting will be held in Meeting Room #7, Second Floor, County Office Building, 401 McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia. You may review the file in the Planning Department, at the address above. If you should have any questions or concerns, please contact the undersigned. EWC:mms ~~~0J ~~ cc: V. Wayne Cilimberg Ron A. Lilley President Harry G. Daniel Chesterfield County President-Elect Peggy R. Wiley Greensville County First Vice President William H.H. Blevins Smyth County Second Vice President Harper R. Wagner Bath County Secretary· Treasurer E. Virgil Sampson Jr. Scott County Immediate Past Presidenf Kathleen K. Seefeldt Prince William County Region 1 William E. Belvin Gloucester County Region 2 Marion B. Williams Prince George County Region 3 James H. Bowles Sr. Goochland County John A. Waldrop Jr. Henrico County Arthur S. Warren Chesterfield County Region 4 John J. Purcell Jr. Louisa County Region 5 Charles W. Curry Augusta County Region 6 John M. Nolan Orange County Region 7 Ferris M. Belman Sr. Stafford County Hubert S. Gilkey 1lI Rappahannock County Region 8 William J. Becker Prince William County Thomas M. Davis III Fairfax County Robert B. Dix Jr. Fairfax County Katherine K. Hanley Fairfax County Gerald W. Hyiand Fairfax County John D. Jenkins Prince William County William T. Newman Arlington County Region 9 Wanda C. Wingo Botetourt County Region 10 Girardus G. Forry Franklin County Mason A. Vaughan Sf. Pulaski County Region 11 Marvin J. Hubble Smyth County Region 12 Kenneth G. Mathews Washington County Past Presidents W.D. Gray Richmond County Jack D. Edwards James City County Executive Director James D. Campbell, CAE General Counsel C. Flippo Hicks * VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES 1001 East Broad Street · Suite LL 20 · Richmond, Virginia 23219-1901 . (804) 788-6652 . fax (804) 788-0083 March 23,1995 f/ --,;tf-fJ5" ;?-.:r.ð.7~ßß3 Mr. Richard E. Huff, II Deputy County Executive Albemarle County 401 McIntire Road Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596 Dear Rick: This letter is to confirm my plans to vish with the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, May 3, 1995 at 9:00 a.m. The chief purpose for this visit will be to learn about some of the major issues confronting Albemarle County. I always enjoy opportunities to observe different boards of supervisors as they conduct business. I look forward to visiting with you on May 3. Land Int rgovemmental Relations Coordinator J""';'("",1 ) ~",.,! \.... L.' ()';-~ PlLE~E~l~l/\F~LE, ""'-\, rr..1~. I, , . \ ~ \ ., .. -, ~ . \. ,¡ , , : ~ t i ~ . 1 : ~.'.J [ i 1: Ll ,..!!; MAR 27 1995 <. ';,.,,: ~,; "t ~ \.::: \.,~.; .. ~ _.. ... .,/ Virginia Association of Counties County Visit Information Sheet The Virginia Association of Counties exists to support county officials and to effectively represent, promote, and protect the interests of counties to better serve the people of Virginia. V ACo is committed to maintaining direct contact with each member of our association. We feel it is particularly important to attend a meeting of your board of supervisors. Then, we can share a free and open dialogue with you about what V ACo is doing; how our activities affect your county; and what V ACo can do to be more responsive to you and make your membership in V ACo more beneficial to you. VA Co Services We'd like to review for you the services that V ACo provides.to its members: Information Services/Communication: -Semi-monthly newsletter (County Connections) mailed out on a regular schedule on the 1st and 15th of each month. This publication serves as an information piece to keep county officials informed of events in Richmond, Washington, D.C., and throughout the state of events affecting Virginia's counties. -During the General Assembly V ACo's Legislative Bulletin (Capitol Contact) is mailed out 2-3 times per week for the most up-to-date report on legislative activities affecting county governments. In emergency situations which require immediate responses from counties, V ACo also issues Legislative Alerts (usually through the FAX machine) to encourage communications between county officials and General Assembly members on key legislative issues. -Constant communication with counties is provided throughout the General Assembly via Capitol Contact and "Alerts" of status of bills and the affect of the state budget on counties, and a wrap-up on budget immediately after General Assembly adjourns. -V ACo works with designated legislative contacts in each county to enhance communication network to other county officials and to maintain and strengthen relationships with individual legislators. -At the end of each session V ACo's Legislative Summary is sent to all counties, informing them of the content of all legislation directly or indirectly affecting counties. ? -V ACo Directory of Local Officials (now at the printer) provides an up-to-date listing of all locally elected officials throughout Virginia and is an excellent resource for networking and information sharing. Technical Assistance Services: V ACo staff is able to provide various types of legal and technical assistance to localities upon their request. Examples include offering management services to local governments on centralized purchasing, centralized accounting, and management information systems. We have also assisted a number of localities in establishing personnel systems. Our staff attorney, Flip Hicks, routinely counsels members of boards of supervisors, county administrators, and county attorneys on a variety of legal issues. .. ... Insurance and Other Services: V ACo currently offers to counties the ability to get involved in a deferred compensation program through PEBSCo. V ACo's "county-only" risk pool for self insurance for general liability, automobile, and property coverages known as V ACoRP now has over 30 members and is highly successful. We are aware that the very existence of V ACoRP has caused other competing insurance pools to lower their premiums. We are currently negotiating with carriers to establish a V ACo health insurance program and are optimistic that coverage may be available as soon as this July. Watch your mailbox for future developments on the V ACo health insurance program. Educational programs (Seminars and conferences sponsored or co-sponsored by VA Co): · Local Government Officials Conference (August 13-15) · Annual conference (November 12-14). · The bi-annual Supervisors Conference (to be held in January 1996) · Other seminars and conferences: · Video teleconference in late June/early July on the model BPOL ordinance and how it should be adopted. VACO ensures local officials' participation and representation in policy-making V ACo's presence within the General Assembly and state agencies ensures that county officials are represented on legislative subcommittees, commissions, technical advisory committees and other entities with policy-making authority. For example, through V ACo's presence, county officials have been represented on the following subcommittees, commissions or councils: · Commission on Population Growth and Development. · Task Force Studying Barriers to Affordable Housing. · Disabilities Board Task Force. · Virginia Advisory Council for Intergovernmental Relations. Finally, all eight of V ACo's Legislative Steering Committees will soon begin working on the development of V ACo's 1995 Legislative Program. Each county has been asked to participate in this process by submitting a list of proposals to have considered as part of the program. A draft program will be available and mailed to all counties in September. You are also encouraged to participate in the process by attending Steering Committee meetings which will begin in May: · Planning, Public Works and Natural Resources, May 12, 10:00 a.m., Richmond · Transportation, May 19, 10:00 a.m., Richmond · Finance, June 2, 10:00 a.m., Albemarle County Complex, Charlottesville · Community and Economic Development, June 6, 1 :00 p.m., Richmond · Hcalth and Human Resources, June 9, 1:00 p.m., Richmond · Education, June 16, 1 :00 p.m., Albemarle County Complex, Charlottesville Thank you for the opportunity to visit with you today. We look forward to seeing you and talking with you more in the future. I. .. ~-- -"~'-'_'----,-,.~.,......."....,..,-- ":;'1 , The Virginia Independence Program/The Virginia Initiative For Ent^þfot.ft~ Not Welfare HB2001 Passed by the Virginia General Assembly 1995 1-~¡>-fS ,?,,?:tP§~¿. ð?/ AFDC Changes- Will be implemented statewide upon waiver approvals 1. Expanded ADC- UP program to 12 months. 2. Added compliance with compulsory school attendance laws. 3. Must cooperate in establishment of paternity within 6 months or up to entire grant may be suspended. 4. Provides for a Diversion program. 5. Requires minor non-custodial parent to pay support if not in school. 6. Provides for a minor parent residency requirement. 7. Provides for a family cap provision. VIEW to be phased in over four years 1. Requires all recipients of AFDC to participate except those exempted. ~ Minor caretakers under 16; ~ Those up to age 19 who are already enrolled in full-time school; ~ Those with temporary medical conditions; ~ Those incapacitated; ~ Those 60 years of age or older; ~ Those who care for another member of the HH who are disabled; ~ Parents with children under 18 months old; ~ Parent of child not a part of the assistance unit (6 weeks after birth only); ~ Female in fourth month of pregnancy; ~ ADC-FC children; ~ Primary caretakers who are not the adoptive or biological parents of the child. 2. LDSS are "authorized" to provide the following: ~ Day Care ~ Transportation ~ Job counseling, education and training, and job search assistance 3. Transitional Services offered upon voluntary or involuntary tennination of assistance: ~ Day Care ~ Transportation for work ~ Medical assistance unless offered through an employer or family income exceeds 185% of federal poverty level. ~ I, . 4. Provides for the Commissioner to set an earned income disregard up to 100% of the federal poverty level. 5. Increases the fair market value ofa vehicle to $7,500. 6. Personal Responsibility statement must be signed by recipient. 7. All recipients not meeting an exemption and who are not employed with 90 days shall participate in a work activity for 6 months. After 6 months participants may receive education and training in conjunction with continued work experience to make them more employable. 8. There is an order of priority for job placement as follows: ~ Unsubsidized private-sector employment; ~ Subsidized employment or The Full Employment Program (FEP) which cashes out the AFDC and Food Stamp benefits to private sector employers; ~ Part-time or temporary employment; ~ Community work experience - must serve a useful public purpose. Provides for a maximum of a 32 hour work week of which up to 8 hours of employment related education and training may be substituted. 9. Sanctions can be imposed up to the full amount of the AFDC grant and Food Stamp allotment for non-compliance. 10. Must be able to accrue paid sick leave or some equivalent in the CWEP. 11. Unless otherwise exempt, families may receive AFDC for 24 months only. 12. Hardship exceptions to the 24 month law are to be developed by the State Board of Social Services. 2 HB2001.wpd i COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY fL'-d-?'S- AGENDA TITLE: Appropriation - Commwúty Services Activity Food AGENDA DATE: May 3, 1995 ITEM NUMBER: f!5: ¿;,S¿1ß, ~.>P ACTION: X INFORMATION: SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST: Request approval offtmding and appropriations for the FY 94/95 Commwúty Services Activity Food. CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION: INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: X STAFF CONTACT(S): Messrs. Tucker, Breeden & Ms. White REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: The Comprehensive Services Act (CSA), passed by the General Assembly in 1992, and implemented in FY 1993/94 requires the consolidation of several ftmding sources for services to youth and their families including ftmding for foster care, special education, and juvenile services. Locally the fund is managed by the Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) consisting of commwúty parents, the Directors of Social Services, Mental Health, Court Services Units, Health Departments and representatives fÌ'om the Schools and other Community Agencies. However, the ftmd is fiscally managed by the Albemarle Department of Social Services for Albemarle residents. DISCUSSION: The local ftmding, General Food and School Food, were provided for in the original FY 1994/95 operating budgets. This request is to approve an appropriation authorizing the expenditures as required by State law and to recognize the State revenues. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of $1,147,155 as detailed on the attached appropriation form #940061. APP9461. wpd 95.068 I~ ~ . FISCAL YEAR APPROPRIATION REQUEST 94/95 NUMBER 940061 TYPE OF APPROPRIATION ADDITIONAL TRANSFER NEW x ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ? FUND YES NO x COMMUNITY SERVICES ACT FUN PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION: FUNDING AND APPROPRIATIONS FOR FY 94/95 ACTIVITY. EXPENDITURE COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 1155153120300205 1155153120571211 1155153120571212 1155153120571213 1155153120571214 1155153120571215 1155153120571216 1155153120571217 1155153120571218 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES RESID. PUBLIC RESID. PRIVATE NON-RESID. PUBLIC NON-RESID. PRIVATE RESID. PUBLIC NON-MANDATED RESID. PRIVATE NON-MANDATED NON-RESID. PUBLIC NON-MANDATED NON-RESID. PRIVATE NON-MANDATED $32,000.00 160,645.00 535,644.00 30,644.00 150,645.00 20,644.00 100,645.00 50,644.00 65,644.00 TOTAL $1,147,155.00 REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ************************************************************************ 2155116000160521 2155116000160522 2155124000240109 LOCAL-ALBEMARLE LOCAL-EDUCATION STATE POOL FUNDS $417,220.00 99,000.00 630,935.00 TOTAL $1,147,155.00 ************************************************************************ APPROVALS: REQUESTING COST CENTER: SOCIAL SERVICES DIRECTOR OF FINANCE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SIGNATURE DATE Y-7;:r-/~ S-j7-)J- COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE /-/f/:/!~ ?¿-~~~~ MEMORANDUM TO: Albemarle County Board of Supervisors FROM: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive DATE: April 28, 1995 RE: New High School Site Selection Process As a follow up to the questions posed at the public hearing on the proposed high school site, I have provided information from our earlier discussions regarding student distribution as well as a further breakdown of the middle school district by elementary feeder school. I believe it is important to remember when reviewing this data that no redistricting decisions have been made and, therefore, we don't know exactly where the students will come trom. Lastly, I have included a copy of a map that shows the various sites that were considered during this process as a means of visualizing the search area. As you recall, the staff technical committee provided feedback on each of these sites during the process and attempted to justify their recommendations to you for pursuing various sites. These recommendations were based on a number offactors including the fact that we were attempting to accommodate students trom the Orange and Louisa County lines in the northern area of the County to the Buckingham County line in the south, a substantial distance at best. Staff requests further guidance on how to proceed, recognizing that the School Division had hoped to begin the preliminary design of the building by June 1, 1995 and knowing that the option on the site will expire on July 22, 1995. A survey, title search and environmental assessment will need to be accomplished before closing. If! may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. RWT,Jr/dbm 95.070 Attachment · RLBE. CTY. TRRNS. DEPT. Fax:804-973-2903 Rpr 26 '95 11:29 P.02/03 ALBEMARLE COUNTY ( \:.' '1 \ . t ~~ POTENTIAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ENROLLMENT AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 Group A - The Western Albemarle High School area of the Walton (RED) Middle School District that is fed by Cale and Red Hill Elementary School: NUMBER OF STUDENTS AFFECTED 5TH 6TH 7TH 8TH TOTAL CALE 52 63 66 45 226 RED HILL -lL ..l.L ~ .JJL 100 74 97 92 63 326 Group B - The Albemarle High School area of the Walton Middle (GREEN) School District that is fed by Scottsville, Stone Robinson, and Yancey Elementary Schools: NUMBER OF STUDENTS AFFECTED ~ 6TH 1IH ~ TOTAL SC-VILLE 32 28 29 32 121 ST. ROB. 38 48 43 38 167 YANCEY ~ -âL -ZL -l.1..... 121 96 113 93 107 409 Group C - Albemarle High School area of Burley Middle School (BLUE) District to include Rt. 250, east of I-64¡ South of Rt. 250, to the Rivanna River; north to the Orange County Line; Rt. 22; and Rt. 231, that is fed by Stone Robinson Elementary School: NUMBER OF STUDENTS AFFECTED ~ 39 6TH 4Ó 1.!H 37 §.IH TOTAL 34 150 Group D - Albemarle High School area of Burley Middle School (ORANGE) District which includes Ashcroft Subdivision; Shadwell Mountain Subdivision; and Glenorchy Subdivision, that is fed by Stone Robinson Elementary School: NUMBER OF STUDENTS AFFECTED ~ 6TH 1XH Æœ TOTAL 4 4 2 7 17 3 NEW HIGH SCHOOL POTENTIAL ENROLLMENT BASED ON SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 ENROLLM~NT (The following counts have been calculated from the enrollment of the 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th grades as of September 30, 1994. The reason being, these students will be in high school when the new school is poten- tially scheduled to open in September 1998.) Western Albemarle - 1349 students, based on Sept. 30, 1994 enrollment Delete Group A - 326 students - Walton Middle School district which is fed by Cale and Red Hill ælementary Schools. 326 students deleted Western Albemarle after transfers - 1023 students Student capacity - 1044 students Available seats - 21 Albemarle Hiqh - 2115 students, based on Sept. 30, 1994 enrollment Delete Group B - 409 students - Walton Middle School District which is fed by Stone Robinson, Scottsville, and Yancey Elementary Schools. Delete Group C - 150 students - Albemarle High School area of Burley Middle School District to include Rt. 250, east of 1-64; South of Rt. 250, to the Rivanna River; north to the Orange County Line; Rt. 22; and Rt. 231, that is fed by Stone Robinson Elementary School. Delete Group D - 17 students - Albemarle High School area of Burley Middle School District which includes Ashcroft Subdivision; Shadwell Mountain Subdivision; and Glenorchy Subdivision, that is fed by Stone Robinson Elementary School. 576 students deleted Albemarle High after transfers - 1539 students Student capacity - 1685 students Available seats - 146 1 New Hiqh School - 0 students Add Group A - 326 students - Walton Middle School District which is fed by Cale and Red Hill Elementary Schools, will be transferred from Western Albemarle. Add Group B - 409 students - Walton Middle School District which is fed by Stone Robinson, Scottsville, and Yancey Elementary Schools, will be transferred from Albemarle High. Add Group C - 150 students - Albemarle High School area of Burley Middle School District to include Rt. 250, east of 1-64; South of Rt. 250, to the Rivanna River; north of the Orange County Line; Rt. 22; and Rt. 231, will be transferred from Albemarle High School, that is fed RY Stone Robinson Elementary School. \.", Add Group D - 17 students - Albemarle High School area of Burley Middle School District which includes Ashcroft Subdivision; Shadwell Mountain Subdivision; and Glenorchy subdivision, will be transferred from Albemarle High School, that is fed by Stone Robinson Elementary School. 902 students added New High School after transfers - 902 Student Capacity - 1000 Available seats - 98 2 NEW HIGH SCHOOL SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 (FURTHER BREAK-DOWN OF STUDENT COUNT) All students of the following groups to be considered for the new high school, were recounted. Western Albemarle Group "A" - Students north of Route 708 ------- 230 Group "N' - Students on Route 708 and south 96 326 Albemarle Hiqh ~. . Group "B" - Students north of Route 708 -------- 162 Group "B" - Students on Route 708 and south 247 Groups "C" and "D" -----------------------------_ 167 576 Number of students that live north of Rt. 708 559 Number of students that live on or south of Rt. 708 -----------------------------------_____ 343 6 \0 W I-' o'f' ~ tJ:j ~ ø U1 tJ:j q ~ H t-t H N :Þ' ~ H 0 Z ~ ~~ e HH :Þ'~ø tj.. ~~ .. Z tJ:IØOOtJ:j :Þ''' ~n~ Ö o~ tjnQO tJ:j.. to 0 tj OOt-t I-' o o o \0 o t\.) \0 o t\.) 0\0 \0 CO -.-I ~ nG) H:Þ' .. ~tjøt-t OtJ:j~tJ:I §Qt" tJ:j tOtJ:jOOS: oo~n:Þ' tJ:j~~ t1tJ:1 Ot-t .. 0 tJ:j t-t I-' 0'\ CO U1 I-' U1 W \0 \0 I-' . w o'f' I-' tÞO 0'\ ~ H:Þ' øtjøt-t~ ~tJ:j~tJ:ItJ:j Ot-t tJ:j00 C:::tJ:j00S:~ tO~n:Þ'tJ:j tJ:j~~~ :Þ' Ot-tZ OtJ:j t-t I-' o tÞO tÞO I-' o t\.) w \0 ...,J \0 o'f' t\.) I-' :. tJ:j..,/",- ~r ~ 0,. ~ i § ~f ~ tJ:I :Þ' 00 tJ:j tj 0 , z 00 tJ:j to ~ tJ:j s: tJ:I tJ:j ~ w 0 .. I-' \0 \0 tÞO tJ:j Z ~ 0 t-t t-t s: tJ:j z ~ ~ H G) ~ 00 () ~ o o t-t Q ~ H t-t H N :Þ' ~ H o Z . ' rv J /JrWI \/ VJ HIGH SCHOOL SITE SELECTION 'ì./ "'- C i smon 4. " / / '-~ßO-~_ * / ~~ e ~ ~ ~ ORIGINAL IDENTIFIED SITES ADDITIONAL DISCUSSED SITES SCALE o 2} 4 HI LES V ..... o Z} ~ 5 , K LOI1ETEIlS :~_ . 6 TO FORK UNION ,. ~,COTTSV lur . 20 L\~ Albemarle I \~ TO DILLW'fN \ County, Virginia Ptépared by the Department of .,----------,-~, Planning and Community Development -red - ~reen ·ISJ ue .. E· brown ~ y I · pearpl. / /-. : HENLEY M;:3'\. " ... " .. " <> " l ýv¡::SIE:B~P.L)3~f\ÂY; 111GH Sq-JOOL € .. ALBEMARLE! HIGH SÇHOOL . ~ {J JOUETT M S: ! SUTHERLAND ill Þ' l ~ II 'I? /' " ... ... .. " <> -'! ... .. .. " " .. ,,. ELEMENT ARY SCHOOLS .. " <> " '" "' .. WESTÇRN ALBEMARLE HIGH SCHOOL .. .. y ~ r:fl/' MIDDLE SCHOOL 'OISTRICTS " 4!.¡'¡ò4 b) ............. HIGH SCHOOL i:ÙSTAiCTS ¡lhi,h<l.,__ . . , c::::::::- NOTt:¡ T~ :Wlw..! I}h~..-kl t.......o1uin "pu..,..h,d ...d.l. ...It!'.n 1I,,"u.itA 1<~I¥a. hu,ihhi...¡ jll..."",tiu flUl to"''''Hihdu ""'r ..dd ~pulll, .bUt...I..lllU,", ",hk¡" Ut ,'ui~h ", II.. o.r...."I_Irl<>ltA..a.¡..n. -- c · " . ... \ ~ G tt :ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCHooL DISTRICTS_MAP 1994-95 'SCHOOL YEAR 1 of 2 !(~.A ! _II. é l.tO.t 6~..t. Urban Ale. map! ~ _.~_ , .-FFUIO:~.~'9 MAY 3, 1995 EXECUTIVE SESSION MOTION I MOVE THAT THE BOARD GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 2. I -344(A) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA UNDER SUBSECTION ( I ) TO DISCUSS APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS AND UNDER SUBSECTION (7) TO CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL AND STAFF REGARDING MATTERS PERTAINING TO ( I ) A COUNTY AGREEMENT AND RELATED PROBABLE LITIGATION ÃN'f'1 (2) A TAXATION ISSUE{, -f) f\"'{) c-r) ()- Sff¿e,hc LÆ(/,,4(. hA,7~1t Ilk~A¡t.'}¡"" ,4- GdJoJ,/c',4 G, , 5395.WPD