HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-12-07
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)
17)
18)
18a)
18b)
19)
20)
FIN A L
9:00 A.M.
December 7, 1994
Room 7, County Office Building
Call to Order.
Pledge of Allegiance.
Moment of Silence.
Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the PUBLIC.
Consent Agenda (on next sheet) .
Approval of Minutes: March 17 and October 13, 1993; July 6, August 3,
August 17, November 2 and November 16N, 1994.
Transportation Matters:
a) Other Transportation Matters.
Update: Design features and planting plans/grants for Route 250 East.
Discussion: Road Name Change Policy.
Discussion: Name change for Charlottesville Magisterial District.
10:00 a.m. - Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reordain
Chapter 4, Animals and Fowl, Article 2, Dogs, Division 2, Running
at Large, by adding Section 4-19(33) to include Thurston
Subdivision as one of those areas where dogs are prohibited from
running at large.
10:05 a.m. - Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reordain
Chapter 3, Amusements, of the Code of Albemarle, by the addition
thereto of Article III entitled "Bingo and Raffles". The
ordinance incorporates State Code requirements for bingo games and
raffles by reference into the County Code and establishes County
requirements regarding, but not limited to, permits, fees,
management and operation of bingo games and raffles, permits for
booster clubs, interim tax exempt status for organizations,
minimum percentage of gross receipts mandated to be spent for
mandated purposes, audits and limitations on hours of operation of
bingo games.
10:10 a.m. - Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reordain
Chapter 10.1, Law Enforcement, of the Code of Albemarle, by
amending Section 10.1-2, Disposition of unclaimed personal
property in possession of law enforcement agencies. This
amendment will authorize the Police Department or the Sheriff's
Department to convert unclaimed property for department use. It
also adds a section permitting any bicycle or moped which has been
in the possession of the Police Department or Sheriff's
Department, and been unclaimed for thirty days to be sold at
public auction or donated to a charitable organization at the
discretion of the Police Department or Sheriff's Department. This
amendment is necessary to bring the County Code in line with State
Code Section 15.1-133.01.
Presentation from GE Fanuc regarding proposed expansion.
Presentation from the Children and Youth Commission on activities.
Presentation: Preliminary 1995 Real Estate Reassessment Values.
Appropriation: Soil and Water Grant - $38,209.83, (Form #940032).
Work Sessions:
a) CPA-94-1. University Real Estate Foundation. Request to amend
the Land Use Map to include within the Hollymead Community 297.0
ac located W of Rt 29 N, N of existing Hollymead Community
boundary, S of the North Fork Rivanna River, and W of Rt 606 for
industrial use. TM32,Ps4B,6(part),6A&19(part). Applicant seeks
change to permit development of a University-reråted business
park. Applicant also owns 228 ac directly S of this area
currently zoned PD-IP. Rivanna Dist.
b) FY 1995-96 through FY 1999-2000 Capital Improvements Program.
Executive Session: Legal Matters.
Certify Executive Session.
Other Matters not Listed on the Agenda from the BOARD.
Adjourn.
*The Board will hold an executive session to discuss litigation
and legal matters pursuant to Va. Code §2.1-344.A.7.
CON S E N T
AGENDA
FOR APPROVAL:
5.1 Appropriations:
a) Capital Improvements Program - ($13,580), (Form #940033) .
b) Regional Jail Board - $5,600, (Form #940034).
c) Migrant Education Coordination Grant - $34,976.77, (Form #940035).
d) Emergency Operations Center Donation - $900, (Form #940036) .
e) Department of Social Services Vendor Payments - $73,535, (Form #940037).
5.2 Authorize staff to seek enabling legislation that would allow Albemarle County
to implement Linked Deposit Program for affordable housing.
5.3 Resolution for the addition and abandonment of sections of Route 20 and Route
742 due to the reconstruction of Route 20 at the intersection of Route 742.
5.4 Resolution to accept St. Ives Road (bulb) in Camelot Subdivision into the State
Secondary System of Highways.
5.5 Withdraw without prejudice SUB-94-053, Northfields Recreation Area Preliminary
Plat.
5.6 Adopt Resolution of Intent to amend the Zoning Ordinance to permit hog farms by-
right in the Rural Areas District.
5.7 Set public hearing for January 4, 1994, to amend Article II, Section 4-19, of
the County Code to include Glenmore Planned Residential Development as one of
those areas where dogs are prohibited from running at large.
5.7a Authorize County Executive to sign necessary documents for vacation of right-of-
way for public road (Amber Ridge Court) in Highlands at Mechums River 2A.
5.7b Resolution for the addition and abandonment of sections of Route 250 and Route
1421 due to the reconstruction of Route 250 on Pantops Mountain.
FOR INFORMATION:
5.8 Letter dated November 30, 1994, from A. G. Tucker, Assistant Resident Engineer,
to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, in response to transportation issues discussed at the
Board's meeting on November 2, 1994.
5.9
5.10
5.11
5.12
5.13
5.14
5.15
5.16
5.17
5.18
5.19
5.20
5.21
Letter dated November 22, 1994, from A. G. Tucker, Assistant Resident Engineer,
to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, providing notj.ce that the advertisement date on the
Route 743 (Hydraulic Road) project between Lambs Road and Rio Road has been
revised.
Letter dated November 22, 1994, from A. G. Tucker, Assistant Resident Engineer,
to Ella W. Carey, Clerk, forwarding the monthly update on highway improvement
projects currently under construction in ~bemarle County.
Letter dated November 21, 1994, from G. Michael Shelton, Mayor, City of Bedford,
announcing that the National D-Day Memorial Foundation has selected Bedford,
Virginia, as the location for the National D-Day Memorial Monument.
Status Report: Skateboard Park.
Copy of Planning Commission minutes for November 8 and November 15, 1994.
October, 1994 Financial Report.
Acme Design Technology, CO.'s October, 1994 operating results (on file in the
Clerk's office).
List of Job Training Programs available for Albemarle County residents in the
Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission.
Memorandum from Robert B. Brandenburger, Deputy Director of Human Resources, to
Carole A. Hastings, Acting Superintendent, and Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County
Executive, re: Governor Wilder's Early Retirement Program.
Memorandum dated November 21, 1994, from Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County
Executive, re: Erosion Control Program.
Notice dated October 21, 1994, of an application filed by Yellow Brick Road,
Ltd., with the State Corporation Commission for a license to broker the
transportation of passengers by motor vehicles.
Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.) Bond Program Report and Monthly
Report for the month of October, 1994.
Abstract of Votes from the November 8, 1994, General and Special Elections.
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martin
R ¡vanna '
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsvil!e
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
V. Wayne Cilimberg, Director, Planning & Community Development
:--? '.- C-
FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk ~
DATE: December 13, 1994
SUBJECT: Board Actions of December 7, 1994
Following is a list of actions taken by the Board of Supervisors at its
meeting on December 7, 1994:
Agenda Item No.1. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order at
9:03 a.m., by the Chairman, Mr. Perkins.
Agenda Item No.4. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the
PUBLIC.
Mr. James Clark expressed concern about Governor Allen's proposal to
eliminate business licenses. He felt this would financially hurt the County.
He understands that business license fees account for $4.0 million in revenue
to the County per year. The money lost would cause an increase in the real
estate tax rate. He asked that the Board take a stand on this issue.
Item 5.1a.
(Form #940033) .
Appropriation: Capital Improvements Program - ($13,580),
APPROVED. Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Item 5.1b. Regional Jail Board - $5,600, (Form #940034). APPROVED.
Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Item 5.1c. Migrant Education Coordination Grant - $34,976.77, (Form
#940035). APPROVED. Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Item 5.1d. Emergency Operations Center Donation - $900, (Form #940036).
APPROVED. Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
Item 5.1e.
(Form #940037) .
Department of Social Services Vendor Payments - $73,535,
APPROVED. Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
*
Printed on recycled paper
To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
December 13, 1994
2
Date:
Page:
Item 5.2. Authorize staff to seek enabling legislation that would allow
Albemarle County to implement Linked Deposit Program for affordable housing.
AUTHORIZED staff to seek legislation to implement Linked Deposit Program for
affordable housing.
Item 5.3. Resolution for the addition and abandonment of sections of
Route 20 and Route 742 due to the reconstruction of Route 20 at the intersec-
tion of Route 742. ADOPTED the attached Resolution.
Item 5.4. Resolution to accept St. Ives Road (bulb) in Camelot Subdivi-
sion into the State Secondary System of Highways. ADOPTED the attached
Resolution.
Item 5.5. Withdraw without prejudice SUB-94-053, Northfields Recreation
Area Preliminary Plat. APPROVED request to withdraw SUB-94-053, without
prejudice.
Item 5.6. Adopt Resolution of Intent to amend the Zoning Ordinance to
permit hog farms by-right in the Rural Areas District. ADOPTED the attached
Resolution.
Item 5.7. Set public hearing for January 4, 1995, to amend Article II,
Section 4-19, of the County Code to include Glenmore Planned Residential
Development as one of those areas where dogs are prohibited from running at
large. SET public hearing for January 4, 1995.
Item 5.7a. Authorize County Executive to sign necessary documents for
vacation of right-of-way for public road (Amber Ridge Court) in Highlands at
Mechums River 2A. AUTHORIZED County Executive to sign the documents.
Item 5.7b. Resolution for the addition and abandonment of sections of
Route 250 and Route 1421 due to the reconstruction of Route 250 on Pantops
Mountain. ADOPTED the attached Resolutions.
Item 5.12.
tion.
Status Report: Skateboard Park, was received for informa-
Mrs. Humphris said she had envisioned a simple facility where skateboard-
ing could be done and did not realize that the facility would have an operat-
ing budget of approximately $23,000 per year, require the County to provide
insurance and supervise the facility. As the County and Board review this
issue, they should keep in mind the issues of fairness, priorities, avail-
ability of funds and on-going costs.
Item 5.18. Memorandum dated November 21, 1994, from Robert W. Tucker,
Jr., County Executive, re: Erosion Control Program, was received for
information.
Mr. Perkins congratulated the people involved with the Erosion Control
Program.
To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
December 13, 1994
3
Date:
Page:
Mrs. Humphris asked if this could be given some publicity because people
need to know that the Ordinances put into place have been extremely
successful. Mr. Tucker said he will take care of this.
Agenda Item No. 7a. Other Transportation Matters.
The Board congratulated Mrs. Tucker on her promotion to Resident Engi-
neer.
Mrs. Angela Tucker, Resident Engineer, said she would like to address any
outstanding concerns from her letter, dated November 30, 1994, (item 5.8 on
the consent agenda) regarding last months Board meeting. There were some
questions regarding the use of flashers in lieu of signals; why flashers were
warranted in one location as opposed to nothing in another location; VDoT's
policy regarding gravel road maintenance; and, various other items. Mr.
Perkins said he appreciated the response in writing addressing concerns and
answering questions.
Mrs. Thomas said she talked with Mrs. Tucker about having a meeting in
Ivy to discuss the intersection of Owensville Road (Route 678/Route 250). A
neighborhood and user meeting will be held in January to discuss what immedi-
ate steps can be taken.
Mrs. Humphris said she received a call from someone on the Planning staff
informing her that she may be contacted by a citizen interested in purchasing
the vacant piece of property at the corner of Hydraulic Road and Georgetown
Road. She became concerned about access to that property because the off-ramp
from Hydraulic goes around the edge of this property and a new, private
entrance has been constructed. She asked when staff should talk with VDoT
about access to this property. Mrs. Tucker said VDoT can work directly with
her (Mrs. Humphris) or the citizen. Since this is a commercial development
she does not think an additional access should be constructed near the
intersection.
Mrs. Humphris said Mr. Roosevelt discussed with this Board the ultimate
improvements to Georgetown Road which included four-Ianing to the intersec-
tion. That project would have a definite impact on the property because of
the apartment complex on the southeast corner. Mrs. Tucker said it would be
best to look at this issue along with the ultimate improvements on Georgetown
Road.
Mr. Martin said there is a problem with the timing of the light at the
intersection of Route 29 North and Rio Road. If a vehicle is going south on
Route 29 and then turning left onto Rio Road, before the driver gets through
the light, traffic on Route 29 heading north is proceeding. Mrs. Tucker said
she will look at the timing of the lights.
Mrs. Thomas asked Mrs. Tucker to do a follow-up with the residents of
Route 791.
Mrs. Thomas said the school system holds bus drivers responsible for
scratches to their buses. The bus drivers are concerned about tree trimming.
Mr. Willie Smith, Director of Transportation, has tried to contact VDoT's
maintenance manager to discuss tree trimming on some County roads. Mrs.
Tucker said she will get in touch with Mr. Smith and work with him on this
matter.
To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
December 13, 1994
4
Date:
Page:
Mr. Perkins asked that a median strip and stop bar be painted on Tabor
Street in Crozet. Mrs. Tucker said she will take care of this.
Mr. Marshall asked when Route 20 South will be leveled where the new
construction recently occurred. Mr. Rick James, a Construction Engineer, said
the contractor milled the road yesterday and it is supposed to be paved today.
Mrs. Thomas said she appreciates Mrs. Tucker taking care of the dip on
Route 250 West near the Christian Meeting House.
Mr. Bowerman said during the past couple of months, he has received a
number of complaints about traffic using Carrsbrook Subdivision to bypass the
construction on Route 29. The five neighborhood associations in that area are
concerned about plans to extend Carrsbrook Drive to Berkmar Drive. The
associations feel that the only purpose of this extension would be to direct
traffic from the shopping area through their neighborhoods. He asked the
Board to direct staff to prepare a report on this issue and do a traffic study
to show the effect of this extension on the communities of Northfields,
Westmoreland, Carrsbrook, Raintree, Fieldbrook and Woodbrook. Pending the
outcome of the report, he would also like to request that the Board entertain
a motion to amend the Comprehensive Plan to remove the extension of Carrsbrook
Drive from the Plan. This could also be done when the Comprehensive Plan is
reviewed and would remove $366,500 from the Capital Improvements Plan for that
project.
Mrs. Tucker provided a status report on the area where the Route
250/Route 29 Bypass enters Route 250 West at Bellair. She reported that it
was decided at the last meeting of the Bellair Task Force that the off-ramp
would be closed. Board members expressed concerns about the role of the Task
Force and that this action was being taken with no input from this Board.
Board members also suggested that a letter be forwarded to Mr. Askew at the
Highway Department expressing its frustration and concern that it was not
involved in this process and ask why a decision was made without consulting
with the Board. Mrs. Humphris asked for additional information about the
history of this area and what traffic decisions have been made. Mrs. Tucker
said she would provide this information at the January 4, 1995 meeting. Mr.
Tucker suggested that Mr. Askew be invited to this meeting.
Agenda Item NO.8. Update: Design features and planting plans/grants
for Route 250 East.
Ms. Marcia Joseph, Design Planner, gave a brief presentation. No action
taken.
Agenda Item NO.9. Discussion: Road Name Change Policy.
Discussed, no action taken.
Agenda Item No. 10. Discussion: Name change for Charlottesville
Magisterial District.
To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
December 13, 1994
5
Date:
Page:
SET public hearing for January 11, 1995, to change the name of Char-
lottesville Magisterial District to Rio Hill Magisterial District, change the
name of the Rio Hill Precinct to the Agnor-Hurt Precinct and change the name
of the Berkeley Precinct to the Commonwealth Precinct.
Agenda Item No. 11. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reordain
Chapter 4, Animals and Fowl, Article 2, Dogs, Division 2, Running at Large, by
adding Section 4-19(33) to include Thurston Subdivision as one of those areas
where dogs are prohibited from running at large.
ADOPTED the attached Ordinance.
Agenda Item No. 12. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reordain
Chapter 3, Amusements, of the Code of Albemarle, by the addition thereto of
Article III entitled "Bingo and Raffles". The ordinance incorporates State
Code requirements for bingo games and raffles by reference into the County
Code and establishes County requirements regarding, but not limited to,
permits, fees, management and operation of bingo games and raffles, permits
for booster clubs, interim tax exempt status for organizations, minimum
percentage of gross receipts mandated to be spent for mandated purposes,
audits and limitations on hours of operation of bingo games.
ADOPTED the attached Ordinance.
Agenda Item No. 13. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reordain
Chapter 10.1, Law Enforcement, of the Code of Albemarle, by amending Section
10.1-2, Disposition of unclaimed personal property in possession of law
enforcement agencies. This amendment will authorize the Police Department or
the Sheriff's Department to convert unclaimed property for department use. It
also adds a section permitting any bicycl~ or moped which has been in the
possession of the Police Department or Sheriff's Department, and been un-
claimed for thirty days to be sold at public auction or donated to a charita-
ble organization at the discretion of the Police Department or Sheriff's
Department. This amendment is necessary to bring the County Code in line with
State Code Section 15.1-133.01.
ADOPTED the attached Ordinance.
Agenda Item No. 14. Presentation from GE Fanuc regarding proposed
expansion.
There was a CONSENSUS of the Board that staff provide a report on the
proposed expansion for GE Fanuc on December 14, 1994.
Agenda Item No. 15. Presentation from the Children and Youth Commission
on activities. Presentation, no action taken.
Agenda Item No. 16. Presentation: Preliminary 1995 Real Estate Reas-
sessment Values. Presentation, no action taken.
Agenda Item No. 17. Appropriation: Soil and Water Grant - $38,209.83,
(Form #940032) .
APPROVED. Appropriation form forwarded to Melvin Breeden.
To:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
V. Wayne Cilimberg
December 13, 1994
6
Date:
Page:
Agenda Item No. 18a. CPA-94-1. University Real Estate Foundation.
Request to amend the Land Use Map to include within the Hollymead Community
297.0 ac located W of Rt 29 N, N of existing Hollymead Community boundary, S
of the North Fork Rivanna River, and W of Rt 606 for industrial use. TM32,
Ps4B,6(part) , 6A&19 (part) . Applicant seeks change to permit development of a
University-related business park. Applicant also owns 228 ac directly S of
this area currently zoned PD-IP.
Held, no action. Public hearing set for December 14, 1994.
Agenda Item No. 18b. FY 1995-96 through FY 1999-2000 Capital Improve-
ments Program.
SET public hearing for January 11, 1995.
Agenda Item No. 19. Other Matters Not Listed on the Agenda from the
BOARD.
Mr. Tucker said there was a notification problem concerning the placement
of a sign for ZMA-94-14, Highlands West Land Trust (applicant), Lady B. Walton
(owner), which is scheduled for public hearing by the Board on December 21,
1994. Due to this problem, the Planning Commission will not be able to hear
the petition until December 20. If the Board so chooses, it can hold its
public hearing on December 21, and continue the hearing to another night and
take action at that time.
Mr. Tucker referred to a proposal by the Governor which would eliminate
the Business & Professional License Tax. It was agreed that staff would draft
a letter for the Chairman's signature requesting alternatives to the elimina-
tion of this tax be considered.
Mrs. Humphris asked about the reason why the Youth and Government Day was
canceled. Mr. Tucker said he would find out reasons for this cancellation.
Agenda Item No. 20. Adjourn. 3:55 p.m.
EWC/jng
Attachments (9)
cc: Larry Davis
Lynne Carruth
Jo Higgins
Amelia McCulley
John Miller
Rick Huff
Roxanne White
( \
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Melvin Breeden, Director of Finance
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC {MJ~
December 13, 1994
Board Actions of December 7, 1994
At the Board of Supervisors meeting on December 7, 1994, the Board took the follow-
ing action:
Item 5.la. Appropriation: Capital Improvements Program - ($13,580), (Form
#940033). APPROVED the attached Appropriation.
Item 5.1 b. Regional Jail Board - $5,600, (Form #940034). APPROVED the attached
Appropriation.
Item 5.lc. Migrant Education Coordination Grant - $34,976.77, (Form #940035).
APPROVED the attached Appropriation.
Item 5.ld. Emergency Operations Center Donation - $900, (Form #940036).
APPROVED the attached Appropriation.
Item 5.le. Department of Social Services Vendor Payments - $73,535, (Form
#940037). APPROVED the attached Appropriation.
Agenda Item No. 12. Public Hearing on an ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter
3, Amusements, of the Code of Albemarle, by the addition thereto of Article III entitled
"Bingo and Raffles". The ordinance incorporates State Code requirements for bingo games
and raffles by reference into the County Code and establishes County requirements regarding,
but not limited to, permits, fees, management and operation of bingo games and raffles,
permits for booster clubs, interim tax exempt status for organizations, minimum percentage of
gross receipts mandated to be spent for mandated purposes, audits and limitations on hours of
operation of bingo games.
I
To: Melvin Breeden
Date: December 13, 1994
Page: 3
EWC/jng
FORMS\APPROP.FRM
Attachments (3)
cc:
Lynne Carruth
Rick Huff
Kathy Ralston
Roxanne White
Larry Davis
John Miller
Robert Tucker
\
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
94/95
NUMBER
940033
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
CAPITAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR PROJECTS THAT HAVE OR WILL EXCEED BUDGET
PROJECTIONS.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1900041000950038 RIO ROAD SIDEWALK $17,524.00
1900041000950096 LANGFORD/PIPPIN 11,696.00
1900041000950043 HILLSDALE/BRANCHLANDS 700.00
1900041020950065 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE 2,000.00
1900060302800901 WARS PRESSBOX 6,000.00
1900060302950020 WARS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING (51,500.00J
TOTAL
($13,580.00)
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2900051000510100
APPROPRIATED FROM FUND BALANCE
($13,580.00)
TOTAL
($13,580.00)
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
ENGINEERING
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~L'# ¿~.,L
fili ¿J ~
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
//- ~2--?~
1:2.- 9- 9~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
. ¡ Z .Q:z¿gy
J
\.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Capital Improvement Program Appropriations
AGENDA DATE:
December 7, 1994
ITEM NUMB~R:
q~ ·1201· S· \')CL
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Request approval of Appropriation #940033 transferring funds, in
the amount of$13,580, for projects that have or will exceed budget
projections.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMA TION:
ATIACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Mr. Tucker, Ms. White, Mr. Breeden
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
A review of capital projects indicate a number of projects which will exceed their current appropriation. Funds to complete these projects can
be transferred :trom the W AHS Pedestrian Crossing, which will cost approximately $60,000 less than the appropriated amount of $120,000.
DISCUSSION:
Rio Road sidewalk was constructed by VDOT per the 09/13/89 agreement and completed in 1992. VDOT verbally confirmed that
the fmal bill had been submitted to the County and, therefore, the appropriation balance of $3 3 ,823 was returned to the general fund.
Subsequently, a final audit resulted in two additional invoices totaling $17,524.
When the developer defaulted on the Langford Subdivision road construction, the bond was called and funds were appropriated
to complete the road construction to VDOT acceptance requirements. The County Attorney (Mr. St. John) confirmed that funds could
not be recovered :trom the development corporation. Due to the age of the road, significant deterioration, and the increased cost of
materials, the cost to the County was greater than originally estimated by $11,696. The road is complete and has been taken over
by VDOT.
As a requirement of taking Hillsdale and Branchlands into the state system, the new ADA requirement for ramping was imposed at
seven locations where sidewalks did not exist. It was agreed that the County and developer would share this cost; one-half was
received:trom the developer. Since the cost of the project is greater than originally estimated, the County's share increased by $700.
The additional appropriation will be matched by work provided by the developer.
· Commonwealth Drive was extended to Greenbrier Drive and Peyton Drive was taken out of service last year. VDOT requires
a one year performance bond at the time of road acceptance. At the one year performance inspection, minor repairs were required.
VDOT has agreed to do the work for an estimated cost ofless than $2,000.
· The W AHS Pressbox project overran the budget by $6,000 due to W1anticipated expenses associated with meeting code requirements.
· The W AHS Pedestrian crossing was accomplished at grade instead of a tunnel under Route 250. This was a safety issue that was
resolved through a cooperative effort with VDOT. The total savings for the project was $60,000. Since $8,500 has already been
transferred to the paving project at the Heath Department, the remainder of $51 ,500 may be transferred back to the fund balance.
To cover the costs of the above projects, $51,500 from the W AHS project will be transferred back to the fund balance. Since the total cost of
the additional projects is $37,920, $13,580 shows on the attached appropriation form as a positive transfer into the fund balance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the transfer of funds as detailed on attached form #940033.
H:IGENERALISHAREISUMMAR Y\940033.WPD
94.170
..
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
94/95
NUMBER
940034
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
JOINT SECURITY
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR SALARY INCREASES FOR EMPLOYEES NOT FUNDED BY THE STATE
COMPENSATION BOARD.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1400033020110000 SALARIES-REGULAR $4,750.00
1400033020210000 FICA 400.00
1400033020221000 RETIREMENT 350.00
1400033020241000 LIFE INSURANCE 100.00
TOTAL
$5,600.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2400016000160527
TELEPHONE SYSTEM REVENUE
$5,600.00
TOTAL
$5,600.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
JOINT SECURITY
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
//-~;"-7~
/;2,-9-P<I
"
...
. Jh'Q~'94 . ".
GENDA TITLE:
Appropriation Regional Jail Board
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA DATE:
December 7, 1994
ITEM NUMBER:
qLt.lZOìCS·t)b
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSALIRE UEST: Request approval of
Appropriation #930034 which transfers $5,600 from the
Inmate Telephone Fund to the Jail Fund for pay for
performance increases.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONTACT:
Tucker, White, Breeden
ATTACHMENTS: Yes /Jr/~
REVIEWED BY: j.J{}J j
BACKGROUND:
The State Compensation Board granted its employees pay for performance increases effective December 1, 1994.
However, the General Assembly did not include Block Grant personnel and the Superintendent in their funding
allocation. This request addresses the equity issue by allocating additional dollars for comparable raises for the
employees who were exempted.
DISCUSSION:
The Jail Board met on Thursday, October 13, 1994 and approved an increase for the above listed personnel to be
deducted from the Inmate Telephone funds. The one-time request is for $5,600.
The Board of Supervisors must approve this transfer, since Albemarle County is the fiscal agent for the Jail Fund, as
well as the Inmate Telephone Fund.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Appropriation # *034 in the amount of$5,600.
INMATE.SAM
94.175
(
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
94/95
NUMBER
940035
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR THE MIGRANT IDENTIFICATION & RECRUITMENT
GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1311461101110000
1311461101210000
1311461101550400
SALARIES-REGULAR
FICA
TRAVEL
$28,331.43
2,167.34
4,478.00
$34,976.77
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
TOTAL
2311433000300001
MIGRANT EDUC. GRANT
$34,976.77
TOTAL
$34,976.77
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
EDUCATION
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
//- ;;! 7- 9ý'
/~ - 1-91'
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
,
;t<.;:';~p;~ Î.»; -r:.> n<)'\'~:i f't~':::,"~!H;~
.'--' 12 .fì"'7 .qJ-i _
¥_~ .",-", "........,...........~",.~.......--._.~...-..-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGRNnA TITLR:
Appropriation of Migrant Identification and Recruitment Grant
AGRNnA DATI'::
December 7, 1994
8fì~l20~lS.I) c,
AC.TION:
INFORMATION:
SIJR,JRC.T /PROPOS A I JRRQJJE.ST:
Approval of reappropriation #940035 in the amount of $34,976.77
for the Migrant Identification and Recruitment Grant.
C.ONSRNT AGRNnA:
AC.TION: X
INFORMATION:
A IT AC.HMRNTS:
STAFF C.ONTAC.T(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Breeden
RRVlRWRD RY:
RAC.KGROTTNn:
'The Migrant Identification and Recruitment Grant fi.mds are used to hire a local migrant recruiter to coordinate identification and recruitment
of migrant children and families in the Commonwealth. This person will hire and train recruiters around the state to make sure all eligible
migrant students are located and adequately served.
DTsnTSSTON:
'The Migrant Identification and Recruitment Grant had a fund balance of $34,976.77 at the end of the 1993-94 fiscal year. At its meeting
on November 14, 1994, the School Board approved the reappropration of this fund balance.
RRC.OMMRNnA TION:
Approval of Appropriation #940035 in the amount of $34,976.77 for the Migrant Identification and Recruitment Grant.
94oo35.EXE
94.179
.¡
. ALBEMARLE COUN'IY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Memorandum
DATE:
November 15, 1994
TO:
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive A. { þ~
Carole A. Hastings, Acting superintendent~ ~
FROM:
RE:
Request for Appropriation
At its meeting on November 14, 1994 the School Board approved the
reappropriation of the Migrant Identification & Recruitment Grant. The grant
had a fund balance of $34,976.77 at the end of the 1993-94 fiscal year. The
funds will be used to hire a local migrant recruiter to coordinate
identification and recruitment of migrant children and families in the
Commonwealth. This person will hire and train recruiters around the state to
make sure all eligible migrant students are located and adequately served.
The funds will be received and disbursed as follows:
Revenue:
2-3114-33000-300001
Migrant Ed. Coordination
$34,976.77
Expenditure:
1-3114-61101-110000
1-3114-61101-210000
1-3114-61101-550400
Salaries-Migrant Recruiters
FICA
Travel
$28,331. 43
$ 2,167.34
$ 4,478.00
It is requested that the Board of Supervisors amend the appropriation
ordinance accordingly.
CAH/smm
Attachment
xc: Melvin Breeden
Ed Koonce
'-'Élla Carey
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
94/95
NUMBER
940036
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
AUTHORIZATION TO DISTRIBUTE DONATION RECEIVED FROM PIEDMONT HEALTH CARE
FACILITY TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1410031040560000
CONTRIBUTION TO OTHER ENTITIES
$900.00
TOTAL
$900.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2410018000189902
OTHER REVENUE
$900.00
TOTAL
$900.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
4Á ~kð~~L
WÆ It) ~.
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
/ / -:;,?¿J - ".9~
/¡;)(~ 9' 9Y
'} _lk..:..Q.2-:.9·~
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Appropriation for Emergency Operations Center Donation
AGENDA DATE:
December 7, 1994
ITEM NUMBER:
qLt'IW1' (S·lld
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECfIPROPOSALIREOUEST:
Appropriation #940036 in the amount of $900 for donation to
EOC received from Piedmont Health Care Facility for services
rendered during the July 4, 1994 fire.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACfION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONT ACf(S):
Mr. Tucker, Ms. White, Mr. Breeden
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The Emergency Operations Center has received a donation of$900 for their assistance at the July 4,1994 fire at the Piedmont
Health Care Facility.
DISCUSSION:
The Emergency Services Coordinator has requested that this donation be used as follows:
· City Social Services Department for the purchase of shelter kits ($500).
· Radio Amateur Communication for the purchase of identifYing vests ($200).
· Unallocated at this time ($200).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Appropriation #940036 in the amount of $900 for Emergency Operations Center donation.
940036.WPD
94.180
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
94/95
NUMBER
940037
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
r{O
x
FUND
GENERAL
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
FUNDING FOR SOCAIL SERVICES PROGRAMS.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1100053013570600 ADC-FOSTER CARE $36,000.00
1100053013570610 ADOPTION SUBSIDY 8,585.00
1100053013570620 ADOPTION-SPECIAL NEEDS 18,950.00
1100053013571006 AFDC DAY CARE 10,000.00
TOTAL
$73,535.00
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2100024000240111
SOCIAL SERVICES-ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS
$73,535.00
TOTAL
$73,535.00
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
SOCIAL SERVICES
APPROVALS:
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
SIGNATURE
~~£~
¡ff/6 w [lß
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~~~~
/óZ-?~ f-ý'
.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
'''" lZ.,·-Q2."Q~
GENDA TITLE:
Appropriation Department of Social Services Vendor
ayments
AGENDA DATE:
December 7, 1994
ITEM NUMBER:
qJ..j·llOr¡·('ó·I)b
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSALIRE UEST:
equest approval of Appropriation #940037 in the
amount of$73,535 to front end state funds for four
social service programs.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
REVIEWED BY:
STAFF CONTACT: Tucker, White, Ralston
BACKGROUND:
Prior to 1981 when Albemarle County Department of Social Services instituted a pilot program, for the State, the County was
required to up front funds for state vendor payments, which were eventually reimbursed by the State. The 1981 pilot program
instituted a state vendor payment system where the state directly paid the vendors with no County involvement. Since there are
only three programs in the state that are using the state vendor payment system and there is no plan to implement it statewide, the
state has asked the County to discontinue this practice. To do this means returning to the old system whereby the County must
appropriate up front funds for the state.
DISCUSSION:
The Department of Social Services is requesting a total appropriation of $73,535 to cover the following line item vendor
expenditures:
ADC-FC - Aid to Dependent Children - Foster Care. This program provides foster care payments on behalf of children in care
whose parents would otherwise be eligible for the AFDC program.. The program is funded at 100% state and federal dollars.
$36,000
Adoption Subsidy - Payments made on behalf of children who are adopted, but whose adoptive parents need additional financial
resources for the care of the child. The program is funded at 100% federal and state dollars.
$ 8,585
Adoption - Special Needs. Payments made on behalf of children with special needs who are adopted. The program is funded at
100% federal and state dollars. $18,950
AFDC Dav Care. Payment made for child care assistance for AFDC parents who are working, but still qualify for an AFDC
payment. Currently, the Department's budget has the local match for this program, but "Front"dollars are needed to issue
payments as of January. The program is funded at 90% state and federal dollars and 1 0% local dollars.
$10,000
There are no local funds being requested for these programs. All appropriations will be reimbursed by state and federal funds.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Appropriation #940037 in the amount of$73,535 .
SOCSUM.SAM
94.176
',. ..JZ·Q2,-º-;J._- p. ,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE: Linked Deposit Program for
Affordable Housing
AGENDA DATE:
December 7, 1994
ITEM NUMBER:
Q4. IW1·(ó, 2)
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Authorization to seek enabling legislation
that would allow Albemarle County to implement linked deposit
program
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
~
STAFF CONTACnS):
Mr. Tucker, Ms. Carruth
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
In 1993, state legislation was adopted which permits any county or city with an affordable housing program pursuant to state law to consider
the affordable housing activities of a financial institution when determining the award of a contract for investment of funds. Such activities
include providing mortgages with reduced interest rates or downpayment funds, providing housing counseling or providing loans for housing
rehabilitation.
No more than 25 percent of the locality's funds, calculated on the basis of the average daily balance of the general fund during the previous fiscal
year, may be deposited or invested considering such affordable housing activities. This amendment to the state code expires July I, 1997,
although the bill's sponsor expressed confidence that the legislation will be permanently extended.
Loudoun Cmmty is the first local government to take advantage of this program and has operated a linked deposit program for approximately
8 months. To initiate the program, Loudoun COWlty issued a Request for Investment Proposals (RFIP) which specified that 5.5 million dollars
was available for investment with financial institutions which provided affordable housing incentives in addition to meeting other criteria related
to safety, soundness and return on investment. The RFIP also specified that the value of the incentives offered had to be equal to or greater
than any foregone interest income.
Two financial institutions were selected in response to the RFIP. Signet Bank and First Union Bank offered a variety of incentives including
affordable housing mortgage funds, construction funds, homebuyer education and downpayment assistance. The value of the incentives was
calculated to be 8 million dollars. Although the program is relatively new, Loudoun COWlty indicates that the program has already increased
affordable housing opportunities for residents.
DISCUSSION:
Prior to considering implementation of this program in Albemarle County, enabling legislation must be obtained as Albemarle County currently
does not have an affordable housing program adopted pursuant to state law. The County has an affordable housing program which pre-dates
the state provisions and is grandfathered under state law. Albemarle County will need to initiate an amendment to the original linked deposit
enabling legislation to permit localities with their own affordable housing program to adopt the linked deposit provisions.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize staff to take appropriate steps to secure enabling legislation that would allow Albemarle County to implement the program. Once
the enabling legislation is in place, staffwill proceed with a detailed analysis of the program impacts and provide a recommendation to the Board
of Supervisors as to the feasibility of adopting the program.
A:\LINK.EXE
94.173
11-46.3
* 11-47
CONTRACTS
~ 11-47.3
Review
Ie sealed
ysis, and
[ seq.\ of
lation in
mg, that
:es is not
basis for
9, c. 235;
D. The provISIOns of this section shall apply to localities on and after
January 1, 1994, and the Department of General Services shall furnish the
forms to localities. (1993, c. 642.)
cieci subsec-
§ 11-47. Preference for Virginia products with recycled content and
for Virginia firms. - A. In the case of a tie bid, preference shall be given to
goods, services and construction produced in Virginia or provided by Virginia
persons, firms or corporations, if such a choice is available; otherwise the tie
shall be decided by lot.
E. Whenever any bidder is a resident of any other state and such state under
its laws allows a resident contractor of that state a preference, a like
preference may be allowed to the lowest responsible bidder who is a resident of
Virginia.
C. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections A and B, in the case of a
tie bid in instances where goods are being offered, and existing price prefer-
ences have already been taken into account, preference shall be given to the
bidder whose goods contain the greatest amount of recycled content. (1982, c.
647; 1993, c. 109.)
l, effective
st sentence
The provi-
m June 30,
The 1993 amendment added subsection C.
qualified
ion, and
ors. Any
iently in
)ortunity
§ 11-47.1. Priority for Virginia coal used in state facilities. - In
determining the award of any contract for coal to be purchased for use in state
facilities with state funds, the Department of General Services shall procure
using competitive sealed bidding and shall award to the lowest responsive and
responsible bidder offering coal mined in Virginia so long as its bid price is not
more than four percent greater than the bid price of the low responsive and
responsible bidder offering coal mined elsewhere. (1987, cc. 81, 91.)
red from
;truction,
) lished in
lcies the
overning
basis of a
;47.)
Editor's note. - Acts 1989, cc. 222 and 231 91, cl. 3 which had provided an expiration date
repeal Acts 1987, c. 81, cl. 3 and Acts 1987, c. for c. 81 and c. 91.
§ 11-47.2. Preference for recycled paper and paper products used by
state agencies. - A. In determining the award of any contract for paper and
paper products to be purchased for use by agencies of the Commonwealth, the
Department of General Services shall procure using competitive sealed bid-
ding and shall award to the lowest responsible bidder offering recycled paper
and paper products of a quality suitable for the purpose intended, so long as the
bid price is not more than ten percent greater than the bid price of the low
responsive and responsible bidder offering a product that does not qualify
under subsection B of this section.
B. For purposes of this section, recycled paper and paper products means
any paper or paper products meeting the EP A Recommended Content Stan-
dards as defined in 40 C.F.R. Part 250. (1989, c. 442; 1990, cc. 449, 857.)
jon con-
¡ work on J
::;ommon- .
duration
required
2 and (ii)
,artment,
ge.
to such
gency or
vaive the
*
§ 11-47.3. (Expires July 1, 1997) Preference for community reinvest-
ment activities in contracts for investment of funds. - Notwithstanding
any other provision of law, any county or city which is authorized to and has
established affordable housing programs pursuant to § 15.1-491.8 or § 15.1-
491.9 may provide by resolution that in determining the award of any contract
for time deposits or investment of its funds, the treasurer or director of finance
of such county or city may consider, in addition to the typical criteria, the
investment activities of qualifying institutions which enhance the supply of, or
accessibility to, affordable housing within the jurisdiction. No more than
oject of a
; he has
Irk, such
rovisions
51
or pursuCU1..1 k a.... loud ~rdIKaI((!fL a.d.o/J/ed.. pnt::>r
.-¡z; Dece~ ß~ /7'ð?
~ ] 14,~
('( ) )I'~ ()F Vllì( ;¡:-'¡¡.\
~ 1 j;") 1
~ 1 1
twenty·tï\"« percent oftlw funds ufthe county or CltV, cdcula¡¡.d on the hasl:' of
the ;¡vctage daily balance of the general fund durin::, t ¡If' p'·c'vious ¡¡..;cal VI';U.
may be deposited ()r invested by considering such investment :1C1!VJties ;¡,.; a
factor in the award of d contract. A qualif:vin.L; in"tilutlon ,..;hall rncet tlw
provisions of the Virginia Security for Public Depo:,it..'-' Act I~ 2.1-;).')9 et seq.1
and all local terms and conditions for securit.y, hquiditv and rate of rdurn
Th i:-; section sha II (·xpire on ,] u!y 1, 1997 Ilowever, a II con tracts a warded
under the authority of this section shall be performed in accm·dance with their
terms. (1993, c. 937.)
Lav
(' I a~"
tornl'.\
~ 11-48. Participation of small businesses and businesses owned by
women and minorities. -- All public bodies shall establish program;;
consistent with all provisions of this chapter to facilitate t he participation of
small husinesses and husinesses owned by women and minorities in procure-
ment transactions. Such programs shall he in writing, and shall include
cooperation with the Department of Minority Business Enterprise, the United
States Small Business Administration, and oth<:,r public or private agencie::;.
State agencies ::;haìl submit annual progress report::; on minority bu::;ine::;s
procurement to the Department of Minority Business Enterprise. (1982. c G47;
19H4, c. 279.1
* ]
herei
proCl
inter,
Free(
B.
by or
C.
the u
opel1J
decid
recon
Cl
oppor
evalu
excep
propo
to pw
C2.
shall
of the
D.
contr;
public
bidde
or UP(
or oU
neces,
~ 11-49. Use of bl'and names. - Unless otherwise provided in the Invi·
tation to Bid, the name of a certain brand, make or manufacturer doe;; not
restrict bidders to the specific brand, make or manufacturer named; it conveys
the general style, type, character, and quality of the article desired, and any
article which the public body in its sole discretion determines to be the equal
of that specified, considering quality, workmanship. economy of operation, and
suitability for the purpose intended, shaH be accepted. 11982, c. 647.\
~ 11-50. Comments concerning specifications. -~ Every public body
awarding public contracts shall establish procedures whereby comments
concerning specifications or other provisions in Invitations to Bid or Requests
for Proposal can be rec('jved and considered prior to the time set for n~ceipt of
bids or proposals or award of the contract. (l9R2, c. 647.)
§ 1
celed
accep1
excee(
bidde]
negot·
scribe
In vi ta
~ 11-51. Employment discrimination by contractor prohibited. - All
pubJic bodies shall include in every contract of over $10,000 the provisions in
1 and 2 herein:
1. During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follo'Ns:
a. The contractor wiìl not discriminate against any employee or applicant
for employment because of race, religion, color, sex or national origin, except
where religion, sex or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification
reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the contractor. The contractor
agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for
employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination
clause.
b. The contractor, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees pJaced
by or on behalf of the contractor, will state that such contractor is an equal
opportunity employer.
c. Notices, advertisements and solicitations placed in accordance with
federal law, rule or regulation shall be deemed sufficient for the purpose of
meeting the requirements of this section.
2. The contractor will include the provisions of the foregoing paragraphs a,
band c in every subcontract or purchase order of over $10,000, so that the
provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. (1982, c. 647.1
* 1
const!
public
subsü
provid
mista!
unint(
work,
unint{
by obj
ments
dra wn
52
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296-5843 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
December 14, 1994
Mr. Gerald G. Utz
Contract Administrator
Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 2013
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Utz:
Attached are the signed resolutions and sketches necessary for the addition and
abandonment of sections of Route 20 and Route 742 which were adopted by the Board at its
meeting on December 7, 1994.
Also attached are the signed resolutions and sketches necessary for the addition and
abandonment of sections of Route 250 and Route 1421 which were adopted by the Board at its
meeting on December 7, 1994.
If any further information is needed, please contact this office.
ç¡;[JJ
Ella W. Carey
Clerk, CMC
EWC/jng
Attachments
*
Printed on recycled paper
· ....... Jz,01¿Q4
~¡ ., 1.1 :::-Q4.:..J2IY1{6/3)
~
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902
D. S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
November 21, 1994
Route 742 and Route 20
Albemarle County
Ms. Ella Carey, Clerk
Board of SupeIVisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Ms. Carey:
Attached are resolutions and sketches necessary for the addition and abandonment of
sections of Route 20 and Route 742. The changes are due to the reconstruction of Route 20 at
the intersection of Route 742 (Avon Street Extended). Please have the resolutions signed and
return to this office.
Yours Truly,
~!tp-
Contract Administrator
GGU\
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
,
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY
* * RESOLUTION * *
The Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, in a regular meeting on the 7 th day of
December , 1994, adopted the following:
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed a portion of
Route 20 on a new alignment under Project 0020-002-S17, C501, and
WHEREAS, the project sketch attached and incorporated herein as part of this resolution,
defines adjustments required in the primary system of state highways as a resuh of this
construction, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this board requests the Virginia Department
of Transportation to abandon :fÌ'om the state system of highways, that portion of road identified as
Section 1 on the sketch, a distance of 0.08 miles, and Section 2 on the sketch, a distance of 0.13
miles, a total of 0.21 miles, pursuant to Section 33.1-148, Code of Virginia, and
*
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to
the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
'},
Recorded Vote
Moved By: Mrs. Humphris
Seconded By: Mrs. Thomas
Yeas: Mrs. Thomas, Mr. Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris, Messrs. Marshall, Martin and Perkins
Nays: None.
i
~
<
~~: n
::z:
:>
~-i""""'~ :>0
b
~ -._~ =1
õD) D) IT1
~~ ~ (¡)
fm_CD <
::J ::J r-
eD - r-
-'.0 ~
::J _ r'"l
a: ~
5'_~ I I
üi I
CO 111 a- I
º I~ ..... I I
:S. ;1 C> I
!!!.. ~ [J) c::> .5TÄ. 155 t 00.00
g ~j" rrI I
r>
~ I
"'T10ÐJ"O
0-::]-
3 a. CD
,.... ÐJ
::r"O II)
-fCDÐJCD
QO ~cc
cp 8 3 <.
cn3 CD CD
Ö'"O ~ c-
.., CD ~ ëi3
CD (j)"O ÐJ
::] CD""
~ '^ a.
.., "0 v, °
CD..,_=:
~ .2. Q ::]
.2. ~ !!!. °
CD,i'+-_
µ. g:3
~s¡=
c- -. CD
30m
::]cc
;:¡:II)CD
~~ ~~~ ~~I
en en en en en
&.8&.&.&.
o ::s 0 0 0
::s go::s ::s ::s
o~ooo
lfÌÌI
~ :;.:1:;.:1:;.:1
:;.:1 g g g
00.0.0.
~ g g ~
Õ II>~.;
£ g. 0 g.
C". ::s::s::s
g Õ Õ Õ
Õ ¡;f ¡;f ¡;f
¡;f ff~~
~ ~ 0 §
!if ¡p g 0.
8. @ g. g
g ~ ~ 8..
8.. õ p.
::T-
o
en () en en en
~o~~~
C". SoC". C".
~ ~. ~ ~ ~
6 = ~::s en
c: 0 ~ ~ 2
gg"!I-::s
~. ~ ¡. i
õ 0. ::s š'
Õ 0 þ)
g"::T- ¡;r ~
ª ~ ~ ~
§ ~ 0. C".
cr- g 2.. g
~ go õ õ
2..~ ¡f¡;r
~ &
en en
(Ð 8
3 g.
c::
o
0.
g g
:=1::
0""
all
" -.
...=
c_
~ :>'
."..
à.;f.
!pi'
.. ..
co::;!
Sf;
~Co
cen
';'~
eno
....=
.....co
~ ..
Ç)o::;!
"'en
~~
"
ã
Co
c
..
-
o
.,
'"
Õ
n
~
õ'
=
..
=
Co
n
o
a
2
:¡
õ'
=
»
ë=
en
3
D) r-
:::!..CS
en CD
()à.
o
c
:J
-<
~§
-8
Oz
+;z.
8'
~
m
~
f'.>
0(;>
:...rT1
wq
~-
r=""
It1
V)
;';>;"0
o~
;-¡
_IS'
1>".....
\I' +
.0
"'~
l>'-9
:"'11I
.."
8~
j;'""'
:..¡~
f"'g:'
iJ'^'
i. 1'"
:t>
""
~
~
~
U>
~
,-
,-
m
~
~G'
~2
~~
~~
T"1
-.J
.l>-
N
~
5Th. 1107 -t 50.00
I
r
8
~
o
I
o
o
N
,
U>
:::¡
r.>
I
IJ1
9
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNIT
* * RESOLUTION * *
The Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, in a regular meeting on the 7th day of
December, 1994, adopted the following:
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Route 742 on a
new alignment under Project 0020-002-S17, C501, and
WHEREAS, the project sketch attached and incorporated herein as part of this resolution,
defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of this
construction, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this board requests the Virginia Department
of Transportation to add to the secondary system of highways, that portion of road identified as
Section 3 on the sketch, a distance of 0.01 miles, pursuant to 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and
¡t
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to
the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Recorded Vote
A Copy Teste:
iJ~
..
Moved By: Mrs. Humphris
Seconded By: Mr~. Thomas
Yeas: Mrs. Thomas, Mr. Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris. Messrs. Marshall, Martin and Perkins.
Nays: None.
i
~~ ë3
.a r>
5' ::¡::
:>-
~~..........~ ::>0
r
0
~.._œ =1
aD! '0
~~ ~ fT"1
(¡)
m_œ <
j j r-
oo -
-'.0 ~ ......
j - (Tl
:& ~
5'_~ I I
Q I~ üï I I
a-
... I I
~. ;:¡. 0
!!!.. ~ [¡) 0 I 5TÄ. /55 tOO.DO
g !:r rr\
n I
:-I
.,,00)"'0
0-::1-
3 c.. (I)
- 0)
:T -0 (/)
~(I)O)(I)
go ;äea
cp 8 3 <'
U'l3 (I) (I)
Õ'-o a C"
.... CD.:<@
(I) ã) -0 0)
::I (1);:0:-
~ (/) c..
.... -0 °
(I) .... -::E
~ .Q. Q ::I
.Q. !î !!!. °
(I). -_
~ ~3
~!:1.=
C" -. (I)
300)
::lea
;:;:(/)(1)
~~ ~~~ ~~~
en (') en en en en en en en en
2°~~~~~~2~
cr. S 0 cr. cr. cr. 0 cr. cr. cr.
g~&ggg=ggg
og.~ooo!ooo
;;' = en;' ~ ~ en,'" ~ ~
s: õ ~ ~ 8 8 ~ . 3' 3'
~g-~8==~ ~~
g. §: ~.!! ~ ~ ~
=g. g~~ ggg
õ_ _00 c...o.o-
g"g. ~~~ 828
:;to °oõ Þ>Ø!Þ>
.. en ~ ~ £ g. g. g.
~ ~ Co cr. cr. = = =
_g a.gg õõõ
~g. õõõ g"g'g'
Co~ ¡rg'g' ~~l'}
~ !?:l'} ¡;;8~
~ ~ª ~;:;g-
3 g Co ~ S' :>
g. g g. ~ g.
,~2.. õ Q.
Co ::T-
o
89
~~
0""
!1.11
.. -
...1:1
c-
o :r
."..
'ª.~
~ a
:: .
c~
:=3=
bQ,
c~
...~
~o
-=
:Jg-
Ç')~
g~
-~
..
il
Q,
c
..
Õ
ri
Õ
n
~
õ'
=
..
"
Q,
n
o
a
~
:¡
õ'
=
»
ET
CD
3
wr
:::::!..8
CD œ
oR
o
c
:;]
.:<
~~ ~~
=£
-8 I'
O:z: ~~
+;e-
8- ~~ 8
~ '" ~
m 0
~ I
0
"" \ I 0
'"
\ I I
en
\ I ::j
\ ,
I \ ("")
\ I
\ I IJ1
1\ ~ 52
\ I
(,\
\ \
~ \
n
:1 I
"" \
I
\
:0::> :0 5Th. 1107 t .5O.QJ
0:-1
:-I
-....
6"....
r ~
.0 à
..o!"
L»J>
:"'111 ~
I»
02
~I.I'
(/I~ U>
o..¡~ S
Yo U> c-
o
c m
cP:;><)
! r...· ~
»
""
!='
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Peter Parsons, Civil Engineer II
Ella Carey, Clerk, Board of Supervisors "i-u) C!--
December 12, 1994
Resolution for St. Ives Road (bulb) in Camelot Subdivision
Attached is the original resolution (plus three copies) adopted by the Board on December
7, 1994, requesting aceptance of St. Ives Road (bulb) in Camelot subdivision into the State
Secondary System of Highways.
EWC/jng
FORMS\ROADRES.FRM
Attachments (8)
The Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virgin-
ia, in regular meeting on the 7th day of December, 1994, adopted
the following resolution:
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
WHEREAS, the street in camelot Subdivision described on the
attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated December 7, 1994, fully
incorporated herein by reference, is shown on plats recorded in
the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County,
Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department
of Transportation has advised the Board that the street meets the
requirements established by the Subdivision Street Reauirements
of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Albemarle Board of
County Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transpor-
tation to add the road in Camelot Subdivision as described on the
attached Additions Form SR-5(A) dated December 7, 1994, to the
secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code
of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Reauire-
ments; and
if
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that the Board guarantees a clear and
unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary
easements for cuts, fills and drainage as described on the
recorded plats; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board guarantees the perfor-
mance of st. Ives Road (bulb) for a period of one year from the
date of acceptance into the secondary system of state highways
against defective materials and/or workmanship up to a maximum of
$3750; and "
FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be
forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
* * * * *
Recorded vote:
Moved by: Mrs. Humphris
Seconded by: Mrs. Thomas
Yeas: Mrs. Thomas, Mr. Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris, Messrs. Marshall, Martin and
~ï Perkins.
Nays: None.
A Copy Teste:
. .J
s::
::I
..... 0
u
tJ)
~
~ ...
0
t!I
H
= .....
'0
M G)
~ " Q)
111 " ,.;
E-t Q I: .
tJ) G) 1\1
" .m a
IZo I: u Q)
0 G) 111 .Q
~ " ,.;
"
): ... .0: ..(
M "
E-t III
tJ) I:
~ H
tJ) >-
"
~ Q
~ ...
::1
I/)
fà 0
0
U
M I:
tJ) 0
oM
M "
::1
= .....
E-t 0
III
0 G)
E-t PI
III
tJ) ...
z 0
III
0 oM
H ~
E-t Q
H ø.
Q ::1
~ I/)
...
Q 0
M '0
tJ) ...
0 111 . .J
0
Po III 0
0 B ,.;
p; Q)
Po ~
>. u
.....
..( I:
0
II) G) s::
I I: 0
p; 0 -r!
tJ) ...: IQ
u -r!
~ G) >
.r::
u 'r!
0 "tI
IZo 0 -§
"
tJ) tJ)
z "
0 I: I ..
aI
H .m 0
E-t
H u Q)
Q 111 ~
"
~ "
.0: Z
I-
~ - :>
is
~ - V>
.:::::. - C>
«
E - 0
<>0
-< jIÞ'
ï JII!':iij ~
:z
'" 0
f! 8
~ V>
.r::
"
01
I: III
G) Q
,.:¡.....
oM
1::2
0
oM G) '" N
" I: <> 0
oM oM <> .
'0..... 0
'0 ...
.0: G)
"
I:
G)
U
III Q)
G) tn
" 1\1
0 Q)
Z ,.;
III 'r!
::1 ):
0
G) ,.;
I:
111 1\1
..... . .J
..... 0
G)
u E-t
III
oM
:2
~
"
~...
,- <>
O.r:: <>
I " ..
PI '0
oM
~
..
'"
..
,
...
'"
..
..
oM · ~
·
I: .. · ;;
oM .. .. . ¡ ~ ~ to
H · · · ·
· <> .. .. .. ..
G) ø on
... ...
E-t ..
I: .. ,;¡
.. 0
0 0 ,;¡ ,;¡ ,;¡ ,;¡
oM ... ..
" 0 0 g 0
.. " 0 0 0
oM on · .. .. .. ..
'0 .. · " " "
'0 " · · 'i ·
0< .. .. · · · ·
" " " "
" .. ...
,
G) .. '"
G) 0 '"
... ,
.. <>
" I ..
I/)
;; ;; ;; ;; ;;
> . .. .. .. .. ..
· ... · · · · ·
Do ... " " " " "
.. ~ " " " 'i "
0 · · · ·
" '2 " " "
· .. .. .. .. ..
f 0 0 0 0 0 0
" " " u u
" · · · · ·
a .. .. .. .. ..
ä .. g .. ä .. g .. g ..
õ ~ õ · · · ·
.. .. .... .. f, ... .. f, ... .. f, ...
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. ...
"
G)
G) ~
...
" ~
I/) ð
... "
0 ·
G) :!
9 ·
·
>
Z H
.;
..
.... ...
G) 0
PlZ '" ,., ... on
G)
01
111
I:
oM
111
...
'0
'0
I:
111
III
.....
.....
....
...
œ
"
::1
U
...
0
...
III
"
I:
G)
~
III
111
G)
~ ri
111
III
III
G)
U
G)
I:
~ .~
111
....
0
G)
:>
oM
III G)
::1 :>
..... 0
u ~
Ie
G)
~ '0
G)
"
:t 111
, ï u
.... oM
0 '0
, I: I(q
" oM
.r::
01 U "
oM ..( I:
... G)
E-t ~
.... ~
0 u
0
.r:: '0
" IZo
'0 0 G)
oM .r::
:t Z "
'0 0 ...
G) H 0
Q E-t
" "
I: (j ...
111 111
... H ø.
111 IZo
::1 111
CI H
E-t III
p; 111
III M '0
Q U G)
" oM
0 ...
z oM
"
...
G)
U
III
-M
..,
I:
aI
.m
u
'"
..,
..,
111
..
oM
.r::
E-t
The road described on Additions Form SR-5(A) is:
1) st. Ives Road (bulb) from the edge of pavement of state
Route 1551, 91 lineal feet to the end of the "bulb" as
shown on plat recorded 10-22-68 in Deed Book 450, pages
127-128, with a 100 foot right-of-way (guaranteed width
of right-of-way exclusive of any necessary easements
for cuts, fills and drainage), total length 0.02 mile.
'" .
,c. ,,"')rl ',. F'" .,. I"'} .Q/) /î,. (
,'..", 1"....."....,1..' ~'-; t. 'vC!(; J k...... __¡..._~
'i'I>"!"'''' ".,N1 ; OJ /ï~1 .'It?rv1 .Ió. .4-)
tb..""lt' II_,~' "'\)~,~~~______
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE . . ..
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ella Carey, Board of Supervisors Clerk
FROM: Peter Parsons, Civil Engineer II Q~
DATE:
RE:
November 22, 1994
Camelot Subdivision, St. Ives Bulb (RIP-93-001)
The road serving the above referenced subdivision is
substantially complete and ready for a VDOT acceptance
inspection. Attached is the completed SR-5(A) form for a
resolution, which I request be taken to the Board for adoption at
your next opportunity. Once the resolution has been adopted,
date and sign the SR-5(A) and please provide me with the original
and four copies.
Thanks for your assistance. Please call me if you have any
questions.
PJp/
Attachment
To: Ella Carey
From: Peter Parsons
Subject: Camelot resolution
Date: 11/29/94 Time: 10:58a
As mentioned on the phone, the resolution I requested you prepare for Camelot should include the following paragraph:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby guarantees the performance of St. Ives bulb for a period of one year from the date of
acceptance into the Secondary System of Highways, against defective materials and/or workmanship up to a maximum of $3,750.
Please contact me if you have any questions. Thanks for your help.
·
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martm
Rlvanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jðck Jouett
Walter F. Perkms
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Sðmuel Miller
November 29, 1994
Mr. Frederick W. Payne
Payne & Hodus
412 East Jefferson Street
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Fred:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated November
23, 1994, requesting withdrawal without prejudice of SUB-94-053,
Northfields Recreation Area Preliminary Plat. This item will be
placed on the December 7 consent agenda for the Board to take
this action. If you have any questions, please let me know.
&J};Y!JG
Ella W. Carey, C~
EWC:mms
cc: Charles W. Hurt
Larry W. Davis
V. Wayne Cilimberg
*
Printed on recycled paper
·
1,,0 UOard,' L,f2.f)~" -94
,¡.,.:;;; qIJ i2lJ.7..(6. 5)
Payne & Hodous
Attorneys at Law
412 East Jefferson Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Frederick W. Payne
Robert P. Hodous
Telephone: 804-977-4507
Facsimile: 804-977-6574
Donna R. DeLoria
November 23, 1994
Ms. Ella Carey
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charloltesville, Virginia 22901-4506
Via fax and mail
File 223-94--Northfields Preliminary Plat--SUB 94-053
Dear Ella:
This will follow up our conversation of yesterday.
On behalf of the applicant, I hereby withdraw the application for approval of the above-
captioned subdivision. I have spoken with Mr. Davis, and it is my understanding that this withdrawal
is without prejudice to review of any later application; nullifies any and all decisions which have been
made heretofore in this case; and terminates the application without the necessity of any further action
on the part of the County.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Sincerely yours,
~~~~
Freòel"Îck V'¡. Payne
cc: Charles W. Hurt, M.D.
Larry W. Davis, Esquire
Mr. V. Wayne Cilimberg
·
Payne & Hodous
Attorneys at Law
412 East Jefferson Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Frederick W. Payne
Robert P. Hodous
Telephone: 804-977-4507
Facsimile: 804-977-6574
Donna R. DeLoria
September 2, 1994
Ms. Ella Carey
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4506
File 223-94--SUB 94-053--Northfields Preliminary Plat
Dear Ella:
On behalf of the applicant, Virginia Land Trust, I hereby request that consideration of the
above-captioned appeal be deferred from September 21 until the analogous meeting in December.
The reason for this request is that the applicant wishes an opportunity to discuss the proposal with
residents of the Northfields Subdivision.
Please let me know whether there is any problem with this request. If not, please let me know
the new date.
Sincerely yours,
~~
Frederick W. Payne
cc: Ms. Y oianda A. Hipski
Charles Wm. Hurt, M.D.
Dlê It! 9i
~
.1 í
I..~, I" ~f
Frederick W. Payne
Robert P. Hodous
Payne & Hodous
Attorneys at Law
412 East Jefferson Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Telephone: 804-977-4507
Facsimile: 804-977-6574
Donna R. DeLoria
July 27, 1994
JUL
Mr. V. Wayne Cilimberg
Director of Planning and
Community Development
Albemarle County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901-4596
'" .~~~Ll.~,;~~
BY HAND
File 223-94--SUB 94-053--Northfields preliminary plat appeal
,
Dear Wayne:
On behalf of the applicant, Virginia Land Trust, in the above-
captioned subdivision apprication, notice is hereby given of the
appeal, to the Board of Supervisors as a whole, of the unlawful
decision of the planning commission of July 26, 1994, with respect
to the said application. This notice is filed with you as agent
for the Board of Supervisors pursuant to Section 18-4 of the
Albemarle County Code. Please process this appeal in due course
and notify me when it is scheduled to be heard by the Board of
Supervisors.
Sincerely yours,
~~
Frederick W. Payne
fc: Charles W. Hurt, M.D.
- ,.' ~.,.., <'II, .f," \·\i ~,;~ ¡¡; .,~
~Lj\ ~...., ( . y..~ .i!¡. fl,,,,, It,,,-'
~ ~. 1iIp.1II.~ ~:Ji! ~ ,~h'l·
.JUl t. ., 1994
, . . ~-).- ,..,;.
,')!'~~qn\íHJ r.,¡::~¡_,;L
I; ~ '.~. ~, ,\"S
..
H. WAYNE ELLIOTT
600 Carrsbrook Drive Charlottesville, Vfginia 22901 804-973-0314
July 26, 1994
Ms. Yolanda Hipski
Department of Planning and Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Va. 22901
Re: Norlhfields Recreation Area
Dear Ms. Hipski:
At the Planning C6mmission meeting held on July 26, 1994 the Commission
voted to approve the staff's report concerning the proposal to "resubdivide"
the Norlhfields Recreation Area. As I understand the Commission's decision, it
was to accept the proposal with minor corrections suggested by the staff.
The proposal as approved weuld leave the decision as to vacation of the plat
up to the Board of Supervisors. The Commission also seemed to feel that it
had no power to make a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors on the
vacation of the plat's designation of a "Recreatioq Area." I disagree with the
Commission's view of its authority. If it has a statutory duty to advise the
Board of Supervisors (Va. Code, Title 15.1-427.1), then it must have the power
to make relevant recommendations to the Board. The situation here is
aggravated by the apparent inclination of the Commissioners to deny the
vacation were it within what they perceived as their authority. Even jf
outright denial or granting of the requested vacation is not within the
Commission's authority, surely a recommendation to the Board is within its
authority.
The applicant's objection to the Commission's decision seems to evidence an
intent to appeal on their part. An appeal from them would seem to be more
appropriate since at this point the designation remains on the plat.
Nonetheless, to protect the property rights of the adjacent property owners,
and the other members of the Northfields Association, this letter serves as the
written appeal of the Planning Commission's decision required by Section 18.4a
of the Albemarle County Subdivision Ordinance .
Sincerely y..ours,
IIM~· ~ ~ taø--
H. WAYNE LLIOTT
Lieutena Colonel, U.S. Army (Ret)
..
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Dept. of Planning & Community Development
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296·5823
\ >D' J~: r~\',
\ !)
" n\
July 29. 1994
Virginia Land Trust
P. O. Box 8147
Charlottesville. V A 22906
RE: (SUB-94-053) Northfields Recrèation Area Preliminary Plat
Dear Sir:
The Albemarle County Planning Commission. at its meeting on July 26, 1994, by a vote of 4-1.
approved the above-noted preliminary plat. Please note that this approval is subject to the
following conditions:
1. The final plat shall not be submitted for signature nor shall it be signed until the following
conditions are met:
a. Board of Supervisors vacation of the term "recreation area" on existing plat as
shown in Deed Book 376. Page 187 on Sheet 2 of2 of Subdivision Plat. Part of
Section Six "Northfields" dated May. 1961 by B. Aubrey Huffinan;
b. Virginia Department of Transportation approval of entrance locations;
c. Virginia Department of Transportation approval of Grading and Drainage Plans
and calculations;
d. Department of Engineering approyal of Stormwater Detention Plans and
calculations;
e. Department of Engineering approval of Erosion Control Plans;
f. Albemarle County Service Authority approval of easements for two sewer laterals
which run from the sewer main on-site to properties on the other side of
Carrsbrook Drive;
g. Albemarle County Service Authority approval of a private waterline easement for
the water service to lot two (2) which must come from a meter set on either
Huntington Road or Northfields Road.
2. Administrative approval of the final plat.
..
..
\..
Page 2
July 29. 1994
Please be advised that preliminary plat approval is valid for six (6) months. Failure to submit a
final plat to the Department of Planning & Community Development within that time will render
the preliminary approval null and void.
In order to expedite completion of the above noted items. please have the appropriate agency or
department notifY the Department of Planning & Community Development. in writing. that the
applicable condition has been met.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding the above noted action. please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely.
~~S)Q- =~~
Yolanda Hipski
Planner
YH/jcw
cc: B. Aubrey Huffinan & Associates
Amelia McCulley
Jo Higgins
RES 0 L UTI 0 N
o F
I N TEN T
BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle
County, Virginia, does hereby state its intent to amend the
Albemarle County Zoning Ordinance for purposes of public
necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning
practice, in Section 10.0 Rural Areas District, to remove hog
farms by special use permit (10.2.2.11), and to add hog farms by
right (10.2.1.xx), as required by Virginia Code Sections 3.1-
22.28 and 15.1-491.
FURTHER requests the Albemarle County Planning Commission to
hold public hearing on said intent to amend the Zoning Ordinance,
and does request that the Planning Commission send its
recommendation to this Board at the earliest possible date.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing is a true, correct copy of a resolution of intent adopted
by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia at a
regular meeting held on December 7, 1994.
C~BO¡JOf COli
Supervisors
COUNTY OF' ALBEMARLE
. . ,. ." .:J .~?1^';t- ,n ',: "H.
..'....'.,... \1-'" ¡ I r;- ~ < . :¡', 1'." 't 1::': ,0...'\,
L~"';~ :>-<~.' . ._...
< c' ~1....&."_J.,.¿...b--..
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Zoning Ordinance Amendment Required by Right-to-Fann
Legislation.
AGENDA DATE:
December 7, 1994
ITEM NUMBE~:
Q4· /1ò1· Çj .0)
INFORMATION:
ACfION:
SUBJECfIPROPOSALIREOUEST:
To amend the zoning ordinance to pennit hog farms by
right in the Rural Areas District.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACfION: x
INFORMATION:
A TT ACHMENTS:
STAFF CONTACf(S):
Mr. Tucker, Ms. McCulley, Ms. Scala
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors, at a worksession on November 2, 1994, discussed the effects of the new right-to-farm legislation, and
supported the staff's recommendation:
1. The Zoning Ordinance should be amended prior to April 1, 1995, to remove hog fanns from the special use pennit
category in the Rural Area zoning district.
2. Continue to research possible supplementary regulations for hog fanns and for other intensive livestock operations.
Consider such regulations as part of the Comprehensive Plan review, and make further recommendations to the Board
of Supervisors as part of that process.
DISCUSSION:
Under the new legislation, the only zoning change which we are required to accomplish by April 1, 1995, is to remove hog farms
from the special use pennit category in the RA zoning district. If we choose to regulate hog fanns once they are pennitted by right,
we may do so by amending the zoning ordinance to include supplementary regulations for hog fanns (no such supplementary
regulations currently exist). Staff is continuing to research possible supplementary regulations.
RECOMMENDATION: /
Adopt the following resolution of intent: /
For purposes of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Albemarle County Board of
Supervisors hereby adopts a resolution of intent to amend Section 10.0 Rural Areas District, RA, of the zoning ordinance, to
remove hog fanns by special use pennit (10.2.2.11), and to add hog farms by right (10.2. Lxx), as required by VA Code Sections
3.1-22.28 and 15.1-491.
FARM.WP
94.177
""""
..- ---
~TE~______________________________________
~ ITIM ID. ª~JI1lJ_~L2~1)________________________
AGRo\ ITIM - ~ I fa:llaJ.QWJ}Jj.J!wmoIEL__
-c~,mmWì¡~. , . _
IEPFRRID lNUL .JJru-ULC:L!~..L~C-~_
Form. 3
7/25/86
., r
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Resolution of Vacation of Right-of-Way within the
Highlands at Mechums River 2A.
AGENDA DATE:
December 7, 1994
ITEM NUMBER:
ACfION: X
INFORMATION:
SUBJECfIPROPOSALIREOUEST:
Vacation of Right-of-way for a public road (Amber Ridge CONSENT AGENDA:
Court) within the Highlands at Mechums River 2A.
ACfION: X
INFORMATION:
STAFF CONT ACf(S):
Mssrs. Tucker, Cilimberg, Fritz.
REVIEWED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
The plat for Highlands showing Amber Ridge Court was approved on October 14, 1993.
DISCUSSION:
The dwelling constructed on Lot 84 does not meet the required minimum setback from the edge of the right-of-way.
Obiective: Vacation of right-of-way to eliminate the need for a variance or modification to the existing dwelling.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The road has been built and the design is acceptable. The property owners along the road have agreed to the changes. A
subdivision plat for the vacation has been submitted and may be approved.. This vacation is to permit an existing dwelling to
remain as constructed and allow issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize
the County Executive to sign the necessary documents to complete the vacation of unneeded right-of-way.
HIGHL.SUM
94.183
¥NOV-21~94 ~ON 10:26
P.01
CRAIG BUILDERS
OF ALBEMARLE, INC.
tV ~
~,l
FROM: (j.,A~R~) ~LI.,4..~
TO: iJ~... ~ ~.
ATTN: ~ ~~
DATE: JI-;V - '1 'I.
FAX NUMBER: 0)1;).- YO ß.s-
SUBJECT: ~~ -1. f..~ I.(J k;CL
þ-~ 'Î9-3~
INSTRUCTIONS:
~ URG~T - P~SE ROUTE TO THE ABOVE LISTED IMMEDIATELY.
(] IMMEDIATE RESPONSE REQUESTED.
(] PER YOUR REQUEST.
(] RETURN TO ME AFTER YOUR APPROVAL.
~~
~ d-u.cÆ- 'I- ~.
~ ~ o.A/ ~ '-/,..-4£-.... ~ ~ ~,/
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~CA '" .( 1; ~ c.~«-R-R. ttL...t. ~
~~~~yf~~~-
J~ PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) ARE BEING TRANSMITTED.
OUR FAX NUMBER (804) 974-6753
338 Wcsc Rio Road · Posc Office Box 6156 · Charlottesville, Virginia 22906-6156 .. (804:) 973-3362
.NOV-21~94 ~ON 10:27
P.02
FElL, PETTIT & WILLIAMS, P. L. C.
^TTORNEYS AT LAW
RA .PIi I.. !'IiIL
\)AVID 1-1. I'fiTTIT
J. PAOfi WILLIAMS
~-:Anl¡¡RINI! J. WOMAt:K
RICHAJl.P IiÖWAIU.M'MITI-
FRED o. WOOl), JR.
DAVII) 1\, FR.ANZIIN
HO EAST MAIN $TI\El!"r
p, O. 80X 20H
CH....lLOTT2SVtLl.f., VUlCiINJ^ 22902,:z.OS7
TBl.ePHoNn
(804) 919·"'00
TBLnCOl'll!ll
(1104) 917,5109
MAIlK I:. LEal'
MEMO:..
November 9, 1994
TO: /MECHUM RIVER LAND TRUST
/' CRAIG BUILDERS OF ALBEMARLE, INC.
~ONESTAR HOMES, INC.
J. NEIL KRONIMUS and CHERIE L. KRONIMUS
cia C. BRUCE MAXA, ESQUIRE
~~YNE G. COATES, JEFFERSON NATIONAL BANK
~NIE S. SMITH, NATIONSBANK OF VIRGINIA
DAVID KITTNER, CAROLINA BUILDERS CORP.
F. BLAKE COX, JR., UNITED SOUTHERN MORTGAGE for
AMSOUTH BANK OF FLORIDA
FROM:
J. PAGE WILLIAMS, attorney for Mechum River Land Trust
and craig Builders of Albemarle, Inc.
Each of you is either an owner or a representative of a lender secured
by a deed of trust on one of the following lots in section 2A in Highlands
at Mechums River Subdivision in Albemarle county, Virginia: Lots 79
through 86, inclusive. In trying to locate a proposed home on Lot 84 in
section 2A of Highlands at Mechums River, problems were encountered with a
side setback and a sewer easement which need to be addressed by an
amendment to the subdivision plat.
The amendment to the sewer line is being addressed by a separate
instrument to be signed by the owners of Lots 84 and 85 and the Albemarle
county Service Authority.
After due consideration, it appeared to my clients that the best way
of correcting the minor front building setback violation would be to reduce
the size of the right of way for Amber Ridge Court, thereby slightly
increasing the size of each of your lots. In order to do this, a legal
document and plat are necessary to be signed by all owners, lenders and a
trustee on the deeds of trust.
We have prepared such a document and a copy for your review, together
with a copy of the plat, is enclosed. The original deed and the original
plat are being circulated for signatures and we hope that this process will
be completed within approximately two weeks. This plat ànd the document (a
Deed of Vacation)· have been approved by the Albemarle County Planning
Department and Albemarle county Attorney but they will not be signed by the
County until all other interested parties have signed.
In addressing this situation, we have tried to corne up with a solution
which would be a benefit to all lot owners and I think we have accomplished
this. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
THIS DEED OF VACATION AND EASEMENT is made this 8th day of
November, 1994 by and among DAVID H. PETTIT and HUNTER E. CRAIG,
TRUSTEES OF THE MECHUM RIVER LAND TRUST undèr agreement dated
July 1, 1989, either of whom may act (herein "Mechum"), Grantor;
CRAIG BUILDERS OF ALBEMARLE, INC., a Virginia corporation (herein
"Craig"), the owner of Lot 83, Section 2A, Highlands at Mechums
River; LONESTAR HOMES, INC., a Virginia corporation (herein
"LoneStar"), the owner of Lot 81, section 2A, Highlands at
Mechums River; and J. NEIL KRONIMUS and CHERIE L. KRONIMUS,
husband and wife (herein "Kronimus"), the owners of Lot 82,
Section 2A, Highlands at Mechums River, collectively the
Grantees; FRED S. LANDESS or M. CLIFTON McCLURE, TRUSTEES, either
of whom may act (the "Mechum Trustees"); BONNIE S. SMITH or JERRY
H. MATHEWS, TRUSTEES, either of whom may act (the "Craig
Trustees"); STEPHEN R. SHORT or STEPHEN T. WILFONG, TRUSTEES,
either of whom may act (the "LoneStar Trustees"); F. BLAKE COX,
JR., TRUSTEE (the "Kronimus Trustee"); and the COUNTY OF
ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA ("Albemarle County")
WIT N E SSE T H :
WHEREAS, Mechum is the developer and holder of legal title
to certain property known as Section 2A, Highlands at Mechums
River and the open space and roads adjacent thereto and shown on
plat captioned "Plat Showing Open Space and Easements for
Proposed Lots 1 Thru 90, Section 2A, Highlands at Mechums River"
(the "Easement Plat") by Roger W. Ray & Assoc., Inc., C.L.S.,
dated March 30, 1993, revised June 4, 1993, of record in the
Clerk's Office of the circuit Court of Albemarle County,
Virginia, in Deed Book 1319, page 134; and
WHEREAS, Mechum is also the holder of legal title to Lots
79, 80, 84, 85 and 86, Section 2A, Highlands at Mechums River as
shown on plat of Roger W. Ray & Assoc., Inc., dated September 13,
1993, revised October 12, 1993, captioned "Subdivision Plat
Highlands at Mechums River Section 2A Lots 1 Thru 4, 7 Thru 32,
37 Thru 40, 47 Thru 52, 57 Thru 60 And 63 Thru 90" (herein the
"Subdivision Plat"), which plat is recorded in the aforesaid
Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1352, at page 57; and
WHEREAS, Craig is the owner of Lot 83, Section 2A, Highlands
at Mechums River as shown on the Subdivision Plat, having
acquired same from the Grantor by deed of record in Deed Book
1439, page 607; and
WHEREAS, LoneStar is the owner of Lot 81, Section 2A,
Highlands at Mechums River as shown on the Subdivision Plat,
having acquired same from the Grantor by deed of record in Deed
Book 1419, page 640; and
WHEREAS, Kronimus is the owner of Lot 82, Section 2A,
Highlands at Mechums River as shown on the Subdivision Plat,
having acquired same from LoneStar by deed of record in Deed Book
1433, page 532; and
WHEREAS, the lots owned by Mechum are encumbered by a deed
of trust (the "Mechum Deed of Trust") to the Mechum Trustees
dated January 21, 1994 of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office
in Deed Book 1377, page 357; and
WHEREAS, the lot owned by Craig is encumbered by a deed of
trust (the "Craig Deed of Trust") to the Craig Trustees dated
November 7, 1994 of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in
2
Deed Book 1439, page 611; and
WHEREAS, the lot owned by Lonestar is encumbered by a deed
of trust (the "LoneStar Deed of Trust") to the LoneStar Trustees
dated July 22, 1994 of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in
Deed Book 1419, page 644; and
WHEREAS, the lot owned by Kronimus is encumbered by a deed
of trust (the "Kronimus Deed of Trust") to the Kronimus Trustee
dated September 30, 1994 of record in the aforesaid Clerk's
Office in Deed Book 1433, page 535; and
WHEREAS, as shown on the attached and below described
Revision Plat, Mechum desires to vacate a portion of the
Subdivision Plat so as: (i) to reduce the size of the cul-de-sac
at Amber Ridge Court thereby increasing the size of Revised Lots
79 through 86, inclusive by changing the front lot line to adjoin
the new right-of-way for Amber Ridge Court pursuant to Va. Code
Ann. §15.1-482(a); (ii) to change the location of the boundary
line between Lots 83 and 84 pursuant to Va. Code Ann. §15.1-
483.1; and (iii) to create new drainage easements on Revised Lot
79 and Revised Lot 86; and
WHEREAS, to the extent this plat vacation involves drainage
easements and street rights of way, it does not impede or alter
drainage or access for any other lot owners other than those lot
owners immediately adjoining or contiguous to the vacated area
who are parties hereto.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and $1.00
cash in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties agree as follows:
3
(1) The front lot boundary lines for Lots 79, 80, 81, 82,
83, 84, 85 and 86 in Section 2A, Highlands at Mechums River,
adjacent to tþe street (Amber Ridge Court) right-of-way and as
shown on the Subdivision Plat are, hereby VACATED pursuant to Va.
Code Ann. S15.1-482(a) and henceforth said front boundaries shall
be extended to create Revised Lots 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 and
86 adjacent to the reduced street right-of-way (Amber Ridge
Court), all as shown on plat of Roger W. Ray & Assoc., Inc.,
dated September 14, 1994, last revised October 17, 1994,
captioned "Plat Showing Revised Lots 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 &
86, New Drainage Easements and Relocated 20' Sewer Easement Also
Physical Survey of Revised Lot 84 Section 2A Highlands at Mechums
River White Hall District Albemarle County, Virginia" (the
"Revision Plat") attached hereto.
(2) The effect of this deed of vacation is to vest in the
owners of Lots 79 through 86 fee simple title in that portion of
the same numerically designated Revised Lots that was formerly
(on the Subdivision Plat) a part of the street right-of-way, said
portion being subject to the right of Mechum to grant utility or
drainage easements therein and further subject to the lien of the
deeds of trust set forth in paragraphs 3 through 5 below.
(3) Mechum hereby GRANTS and CONVEYS unto the Mechum
Trustees in trust pursuant to the terms of the Mechum Deed of
Trust all of Revised Lots 79, 80, 84, 85 and 86 as shown on the
Revision Plat to secure Jefferson National Bank, Noteholder. In
all other respects Mechum and the Mechum Trustees agree that the
Mechum Deed of Trust remains unchanged and in full force and
4
effect.
(4) Craig hereby GRANTS and CONVEYS unto the Craig Trustees
in trust purs~ant to the terms of the Craig Deed of Trust all of
Revised Lot 83 as shown on the Revision Plat to secure
NationsBank of Virginia, N. A., Noteholder. In all other
respects Craig and the Craig Trustees agree that the Craig Deed
of Trust remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
(5) LoneStar hereby GRANTS and CONVEYS unto the LoneStar
Trustees in trust pursuant to the terms of the LoneStar Deed of
Trust all of Revised Lot 81 as shown on the Revision Plat to
secure Carolina Builders corporation, Noteholder. In all other
respects LoneStar and the LoneStar Trustees agree that the
LoneStar Deed of Trust remains unchanged and in full force and
effect.
(6) Kronimus hereby GRANTS and CONVEYS unto the Kronimus
Trustee in trust pursuant to the terms of the Kronimus deed of
trust all of Revised Lot 82 as shown on the Revision Plat to
secure Amsouth Bank of Florida, Assignee. In all other respects
Kronimus and the Kronimus Trustee agrèe that the Kronimus Deed of
Trust remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
(7) Craig and Mechum as the holders of legal title to
Revised Lot 83 and Revised Lot 84, respectively, hereby VACATE
the prior boundary line between said lots as shown on the
Subdivision Plat and RELOCATE the boundary between said lots as
shown on the aforesaid Revision Plat.
(8) Mechum as the holder of legal title to Revised Lot 79
and Revised Lot 86 hereby GRANTS and CONVEYS for public use the
5
new drainage easements located on Revised Lot 79 and Revised Lot
86 as shown on the Revision Plat.
(9) By separate instrument, Mechum and the Albemarle County
Service Authority shall relocate ~he sewer easement on (Revised)
Lots 84 and 85.
(10) The County of Albemarle, Virginia acting by its
governing body, the Board of Supervisors, executes this
instrument by its duly authorized agent to evidence its approval
of vacating and relocating the boundary lines as shown on the
Revision Plat.
(11) All parties agree that this deed of vacation may be
executed in counterparts or with separate signature pages.
WITNESS the following duly authorized signatures and seals:
C0vd71 /q;1, ~
David H. Pett~t, Trustee
Mechum River Land Trust
(SEAL)
of
~ ;¡;::;~ (SEAL)
Hunter E. Cra~ , Trustee of
Mechum River Land Trust
Approved and Trustees
authorized to sign:
JEFFERSON NATIONAL BANK,
~lder
By - ayn~~
f?j 2. /? -A,N.
Fred S. Landess, Trustée' or
M. Clifton McClure, Trustee
(SEAL)
6
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNT.Y OF t:.-~c>.¡. -~v"I'Í:.-
, to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
lð~ day of \...r)¿)v~~ , 1994 by David H. Pettit as Trustee of
Mechum River Land Trust.
My commission expires: ~ -3" /4 q..s
~Ltr;ctt:r? ~
Notary bl1.ë?'
STATE OF VIRGINIA
eFlI¥/COUNTY OF ~
, to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
\ D 'tI--. day of ~ , 1994 by Hunter E. craig as Trustee of
Mechum River Land Trust.
My commission expires: ~ ~I \ \""f~
~Å).~
Notary Public
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITy/eSUNTY OF M#J.?~~~¿I¡¿¡/~
, to-wit:
The foregoi g instrument was acknowledged before me this
JJft- day of ~, 1994 by W~~ ¡:;;:: &~e.-s
ás" of Jefferson National Bank.
My commission expires:
~- ~- ~g
~~c;þ~
Notary Publ1.c
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF ëhå.c..Jð'¡-~vllfe-
, to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
,~ day of L.r"Mv,¿,-'7~ , 1994 by ~U-<i...5. ~d.¿D:5
Trustee on behalf of Jefferson National Bank.
,
My commission expires: L.rì-)~ ,'3 (, 14 ~.5
Lr)~~ lr). j~
Notary Pu_b ic é
7
CRAIG BUILDERS OF ALBEMARLE, INC.
Approved and Trustees
authorized to_sign:
NA~~~;=rOF VréiI(jA, .NoAo
By /¿)¡1¡?t~ /M]{ü/Ÿ L
Tit1e: ¡J¡eC ,t'42é5IOé,vr
(SEAL)
STATE OF VIRGINIA
eHUl/COUNTY OF ~
, to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
~~ day of ~ ,1994 by Samuel D. Craig, III as Vice
President of Craig Builders of Albemarle, Inc.
My commission expires: ~ ~ I , \ ~ ~ "4
~í;j.~
Notary Public
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF 1'__?1J'¡o+f~VIII¿
, to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
,úf!; day of Lrx>v'¿""~ , 1994 by ~"'Ir"'___ ..5. Óh?,.rf-)
as V(~ .p~/~""" of NationsBank of Virginia,
N. A.
My commission expires: ~..... 3 f) I c:¡ 45
~~Lr-)..A~
NotarlCYubl~.-J
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY / CeUUTY OF r" /7A~Jð.#~vl f (f"--,
, to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
fú-r.!? day of '--I'""Jðv~l?7~ , 1994 by 6ör?'? 'ý .6. ~rf"1)
as Trustee on behalf of NationsBank of Virg1nia, N. A.
My commission expires: ~ \3/: 144.5
~ð l.r7. ~
Noear ubl~
8
LONESTAR HOMES, INC.
Approved and Trustees By / ;JL. .L9~ fi ¡}.~
authorized tQsign: W. L. Deane,'Jr., President
CAROLINA BUILDERS CORPORATION,
Noteholder
~rtlef'~¿&d/-
f<-e;- I~ ~a ~
STATE OF VIRGINI~ ~
~/COUNTY OF ~~./
(SEAL)
, to-wit:
_1Jrhe fOreg~.i g i~rument was acknowledged before me this
~ day of . ~~ ~, 1994 by W. L. Deane, Jr. as President
of Lonestar Homes, Inc.
My commission expires:
STATE OF /~
r;:L!H'/COUNTY 0 ~A?/¿t)..6
~/šO/7'~
~/Iá'/~&~
No ary Public
, to-wit:
~e foregoing ~trument was acknowledged befo~e this
/1 day of ~~ e4 , 1994 by ~~/ 41 ~
as ~~ð/ 7??ß;;;j of arol1.na Bu1. de s
Corp t1.on.
My commission expires:
(SEAL)
STATE OF ~
ç:pr£/COUNTY 0 ~Ah
Ø'c;/#h
~~::<~~ .
Notary Publ1.c
, to-wit:
;!,he fOre~%~rument was aCknOw~ed befo~~is
/7a day of 0, 1994 by ~ ~ ~/ ~
as Trustee on behalf of Carolina Builde s Corporatio .
My commission expires:
Ø~/ý'6
~~&~&A
'N'otary Public
9
Approved and Trustee
authorized to sign:
AMSOUTH BANK OF FLORIDA,
assignee of United Southern
Mortgage Corporation of
Roanoke by assignment of
record in DB 1433 p.544,
ByNote~~
Title:
STATE OF VIRGINIA~ ~
~/COUNTY OF a ~
ß~:?¿;~J
4r. Neil Kron1mus
/',/.~ff '
L/(,ü" . ~~~
Cherie L. ronimus
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
~~
(SEAL)
F. lake Cox, Jr., Trustee
, to-wit:
. ./The fore~9ing ins~rument was acknow17dged b7fore me this
/?~ day of ¿¿¡Z~éJ¿,4 , 1994 by J. Ne1l Kron1mus and Cherie
L. Kronimus.
~/The foregoing i~~rument was acknow1~g~d ~f~re me this
/ð~ day OfZ~ ,1994 by ..;t: £2é'~ ~
as ~~__ of Amsouth Bank of Florida.
My commission expires: ~~q~h
N~~4f1{~&¿~
My commission expires:
STATE OF (-4'.J(.,,/~
~/CQUNTY 0 ' ~~d'
(SEAL)
STATE OF VIRGINI~ ~ ~
CITY/COWTY OF ~ ~
'f//a:J)ç6'
" ./
~-Ø~~&~
- No ary Pub11c
, to-wit:
, to-wit:
~he fore~g i~ument was acknowledged before me this
/f day of ~.ø? ~, 1994 by F. Blake Cox, Jr., Trustee
for AmSouth Bank of Flor1da, assignee of United Southern Mortgage
Corporation of Roanoke.
My commission expires:
~/SO.ß'6
~~L/k~
Notary Public
10
By
BEMARLE, VIRGINIA
rd of Supervisors
STATE OF VIRGINIA Alh I
-eHY /COUNTY OF e...1Y1C1J' .e
, to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was ackn~!edged before me this
¡Y41 day of h~~~ ' 1994 by ~,..f ttJ. -Y;;c."-~.-r J/).
as Aü tf¡()(¡2.~d J1 f of the Albemarle County Board
of Supervl.sors.
My commission expires: ~~ "101/997
fçll:i'ui&c4) ~
11
T
-
-
-
-
-
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON 9-14-94
I SURVEYED THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON REVISED
LOT 84. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDÇJE, INFORMATION
II. BELIEF AND IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION THEY ARE
COMPLETE AND ACCURATE.
I
--------------~------~
EXISTING 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
-- P1P£
----------------- .
OLD LOT--.......:· NEW
DRAINAGE
LINE .' EASEMENT
REVISED NEW lOT
LOT 79 LINE
: AMBER RIDGE
: ROAD
CALE : I" = 3C
. -n._" ;
........
, .J;
SHEET OF 2
ORIGINAL AREAS IN LOTS
62 PLAT
-
PHYSICAL SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN ON REVISED lOT 84 ONLY
ME CHUM RIVER LAND TRUST
1352-57
D.B
LEGAL REFERENCES: D.B. 1396-45 PLAT
D.B. 1319-134, 142 PLAT&. D.B. 1070-427.
PROPERTY ZONED R4
OF LOTS
OWNER(S)
;:~ôn;,;
2.
3
I.
REVISED LOT 84 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING:
A. 10' DRAINAGE II. UTILITY EASEMENT RESERVED ADJACENT TO EACH
PROPERTY LINE (EXCEPT LINES CONSTITUTING PARTY WALL
BOUNDARIES) (D.B. 1352-57),
B. JOINT DRIVEWAY EASEMENT !D.B. 1212-557),
C. EASEMENT TO VIRGINIA ELECTRIC II. POWER CO. !D.B. 1337-117)
D. EASEMENT TO CENTRAL TEL. CO. OF VIRGINIA !D.B 339-469
II.
REVISED TOTAL AREA
LOTS (SECTION 2A)=
17.3423 ACRES ,*
NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED
4
5
6
ORIGINAL AREA IN ROAD
(SECTION 2A)= 3.3109 AC
REVISED TOTAL
ROAD (SECTION
3.2911 ACRES
(0.198 AC. ADDED TO LOTS
8. 86,
IN
AREA
2A) =
PLA T SHOWING
REVISED LOTS 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85
NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND
RELOCA TED 20' SEWER EASEMENT
ALSO PHYSICAL SURVEY OF REVISED LOT 84
SECTION 2A
HIGHLANDS AT MECHUMS RIVER
WHITE HAI_L DISTRICT
ALBEMARLE COUNTY , VIRGINIA
I" = 30' DA TE: 9-14-94
REVISED : 10-7-94
SCALE
WITH
COMBINED
S TO BE ADDED TO
7. VACATED RIGHT OF WAY
LOTS AS SHOWN,
FOR
CRAIG BUILDERS
ROGER W. RAY II. ASSOC., INC
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VA.
LOT 89
I LOT 90
,
....?!;L 2 ? /
,
UN£ ,
88
\OT
,
,
87
Nª-£°03'00"£
la'
LOT
/ I
'0Q:'
'J-wwQ
.+1 QJ ~ <:r
èiJ~go
-<:rQ:'Q:
~~O?-\r\
?\...þ..\
\":,9õ-A'S
\).S
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
MECHUM RIVER LAND TRUST
0.8. 1070 - 427
DA TE : 9-14-94
REVISED : 10-7-94
177.60
= 30
BUILDING
. AS-BUlL T
() . MH
r-" I
./!
/.lj'
//j'
/
/
SCALE
I
.
toM. 57A -~86
REVISED LOT 86
10,169 S.F.
\
T.M. 57 A -®85
REVISED LOT 85
11,581 S.F. /
/
I(
( \'
\,.~s;>
. . ~
. .
IRON .
SET
ol
=i:
2l
~
o
!f2
--
-.J-
~j
o Q
(J~
-.::::::,
IRON W ;{
SET:::! 9 - ÚJ
:! Q: I (:)
ÚJ _ 2) <:r
QJ- Q:!2 ~
ÚJ ,~ l.J.J . a:<:r ÚJ
l.J..Jv...J f'r\ QJ Q
V?i!i ~ 0" QQ,"
.q-'-
-
\
\
\
\
(:) \
NI --\
~I
,_/ -------__ LOT 78
--
--
-- --- --- ~~~~~---------
LOT
....
-
-
--
--"
L O~ _.! ;+_'r" - /"
75
LOT
OPEN SPACE
o
o
I'-
CD
3:
('f)
('f)
°
('f)
I'-
Z
CD 6= 46°23'50"
R= 35.00
L= 28.34
C= 27.57
C8= N83°08'55"W
®6~ 272°47'40'
R= 52.00
L= 247.57
06= 46°23'50"
R= 35.00
L= 28.34
C= 27.57
C8= S36°45'05"E
"
/
~
t
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE,22902
December 5, 1994
D. S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
Ms. Ella Carey, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlotte~e, VA 22902
Route 1421 and Route 250
Albemarle County
Proj.0250-002-105,C501
Dear Ms. Carey:
Attached are resolutions and sketches necessary for the addition and abandonment of
sections of Route 250 and Route 1421. The changes are due to the reconstruction of Route 250
on Pantops Mountain. Please have the resolutions signed and return to this office.
Yours Truly,
¿~A1f·
Gerald G. Utz
Contract Administrator
GGU\
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY
* * RESOLUTION * *
The Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, in a regular meeting on the -1.tl1 day of
December , 1994.., adopted the following:
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed a portion of
Route 250 on a new alignment under Project 0250-002-105, C501, B601, and
WHEREAS, the project sketch attached and incorporated herein as part of this resolution,
defines adjustments required in the primary system of state highways as a result of this
construction, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this board requests the Virginia Department
of Transportation to abandon.ftom the state system of highways, that portion of road identified as
Section 1 on the sketch, a distance of 0.24 miles, pursuant to Section 33.1-148, Code of Virginia,
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to
the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
A Copy Teste:
\I
Recorded Vote
Moved By: Mrs. H11Illphr; s
Seconded By: Mrs. Thomas
)'eas: Mrs. Thomas, Mr. Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris, Messrs. Marshall, Martin and Perkins
Nays: = None.
~~
:;)
-~~~
~ii1_.g
~~ ~
~m.3
:;) CD
'2. a
:;)_0
CD -
~ -f
:r.;
tC :;)
o '"
<" 1'8
~:. ~
:;) õ'
:;)
6' g, II) .:c1
3 ~CÐ
:T -0 g:
-I(DII)(Þ
go êäco
cp 8 3 ë:'
Ul3(þ(þ
õ' -0 ::J ....
.... -~"'-'
(þ ~~ ëiJ
::J(Þ-oll)
c::: (þ;>o:'
ëiJ-oUlg.
-0 'ª õ' :E
a (þ..,::J
CD' s¡ ~ 0
s¡- --
. UI m 3
cs¡=
30'" õ' ~
::JCO
_ .. UI ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\ \
@
I
L
~~~~~~~~~m!
g'S gg.a.å 8~ ~ ~..,~
R !::s ° o' ::s ¡:to ¡:to ¡:t à.:I·
S, g. 0::S::S! g g o' ~ ~
0::S ..... S, 0 ° ::s::- ...
_ .. CI)::S CI)..... ..... 0 0 co""
Q.o'<O 0 Cl)CI)~""''''''N.
~ g- ~ ~ g 8 ~ 3' ~ ~ i ~
g.~3g ~~3~~~?S
:: 0 õ' '-<!..:! I" I" Õ &.
oQ. ::sl"I" ooG'.Y'·
g' Õ õ g g ~ ~ ~ <;"J~
ri ff g'!:::!::: g õ õ ~~
::ICI) o>gg 0>£(')-;:;
§ 0 2t 0> 0> g.::r. ~ rp:3
0" 8 o::r· ¡:to ::I 0 õ' b-"
0::1 Q. g ° ::s::s co'"
@ g. õ õ:: õ õ õ -¡¡
Q.~ So 0"0 g'g'g' ~
~ o~! ~~~ ~
~ ~O" <ng~ ~
3 o~ ;»::sQ. õ'
g. g. ~ S" g =
='~ c..t:C'Þ ~
~o.. õ~c.. C.
0. So g
C> ¡;
2
~
õ'
=
CH~
~~SVIl.J. ~
RL£~ ß
Co~ ---:
t
s
~
....
!"
N
-.D
)~
_ U>
.......
-.
.......
-. .......
STh. 5Ot1D~
~!1! --,
.. I
~g I
~~ I
I
I
I
I
I
%1
<ft
fT11
~
I
---'
~
~~
[ì:S
uoZ
..z
~-
- ~
~.
:¡;
~
~
~
of>
oS:
~¡:¡
~(11
¡;~
~~
~~
IE
»
a=
CD
3
~¡
CD <11
::;)
(")c-
o
C
:J
-<
-=- O"E1l\.OOK ~N~C£
II
"'" ~,;;
<léF~_ ~¿....~/ ,......:=- N. RWTOP:> DR\\JE..
'''''-.:ro ) , I
IV I't 1/' I
I'/Cê 1/1
_' -.III
ì/í
II'
Ii\.
¡r.....'......
, .... 1.1_
" - '~S1'o
I I "11<11,.
I ~"i'
, I ~
I I ('..,~
I.,' R~
'i'
I: '
"\..
I!~®-
1/' 'Q
1, .:0
.'
I:'
',',
~ 1\ ~
<J I Ì"\. ;.
"< ....,....._ _ _ I I ,:d
.... ~ ':. ~: ----:-:::;" "
'.........~..:::..... I ,,',
"~."\
'- '
'- ......"
I)..·...'........ \ \
'I ......... ........\'
rY (~'':-.:-.
~ ...~............~'1(ð'
/1 .... '1...
'J
,)
---
?
~
C>
......
\J\
C>
I
~
1...
C>
¡-.:)
-~
~
C>
N
U'1
C>
,
o
o
I':>
I
o
~
r>
I
lJI
o
H
~
5t1\ , 14'\ · DQ....-.-I...
~
·
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY
* * RESOLUTION * *
The Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County, in a regular meeting on the ~day of
December , 199ib adopted the following:
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed a portion of
Route 1421 on a new alignment under Project 0250-002-105, C501, B601, and
WHEREAS, the project sketch attached and incorporated herein as part of this resolution,
defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of this
construction, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department
of Transportation to add to the secondary system of state highways that portions of road
identified as Section 4 on the sketch to be added, a distance of 0.04 miles, pursuant to Section
33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and,
i
r
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board abandons as part of the secondary system of
state highways, that portion of road identified as Section 3 on the sketch, a distance of 0.04 miles,
pursuant to Section 33.1-155, Code of Virginia, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to
the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
."
Recorded Vote
Moved By: Mrs H11mpnric:
Seconded By: Mrs. Thomas
Yeas: Mrs. Thomas, Mr. Bowerman, Mrs. Humphris, Messrs. Marshall, Martin and Perkins.
Nays: ~e.
<
~~:
~~~~
~ ~ _-0
-III II)
m:!! ;::¡.
-0_3
(Om ( )
.¡:.:;) :;)
eg. -;;
:;) -
:g ::;t
::!. _III
:;) :;)
(Q '"
º 1"8
:s. ;::¡.
!!!.. !!!.
g g.
"01\)"'0
0-:]-
3 a. CD
__ I\)
::T -0 fJ)
- CD I\) CD
QO Cß(Q
cp 8 3 <'
<n3CDCD
.......-0 ~ 0"
° - -,
-'CD~CD
CD CD -0 I\)
:] CD"'-
0': 'A a.
-, -0 v, °
CD-,-o,:e
~ .2. Q :]
.2. ~ ~ °
CDr-_
s¡ fJ)3
. CD
~s¡=
0" -. CD
301\)
:](Q
;::;:fJ)CD
~
ALBE,.., OT!J:~'>VIl.J..E
IJ,RlE~
couAtrY
--l
t
s
::.:
-t
,..,
""
..0
STA, 50-t1ð~
~w flOU:;
- -- - -- - -- é bl?IVE:
ro -I
I ~~ I
~~ I
I ~~
I ~~ I
..
~ I ~
I I D ~
I it.> I :'0:0 8
0<:>
I ~ I ~~ ~
\ ~~ I 1»- ~
8:5 f">
\ I .. ..
I N8
lI'z V>
\ I!z žl '"
I i r>
ŒJ ~- ()\ ~
0.~ ""1 rv
I o· ~I
:¡;.:
~
L -- -- --- ____.-.1
~~ ~~I ~~~H
en (') enen en en en en en en "''''
~o~~~~~~~~,ª:I.
g. [5 g g. g. g. g g. g. g. ~. ~
:::s ~ !:::s :::s :::s !:::s ::s :::s ~~
oa. 000000=.
...., 0 ....,....,...., ....,....,...., ~ =
o :::s en::S en en en~ ~ ~ c¡>C>.
~ Õ ~ ~ 8 8 ~ §" Ër ~r g 00
Q!3g~g.3~~~~i
g. g; ~....¿ ~ ::>;: ::>;: ::>;: JI'..
:::s co g::>;: ::>;: g g g Ç)~
õo.. _00 Q...Q..Q..(hOO
Õ 0 Ø) þ) _ _ - o~
g- 9- CT 0. 0. g g g .:-¡:
.., n õ õ '" '" '" t;Ø=
g ~ ~ £ £ g. g. g. ~ ~
§ co 0. a. a. ::3::S::S _ c
(fi ~~~ ~~~ g
ß.~ 9-CTCT ge,'" õ
n 0 0 S en' r::r n
~ e,~ ",g§ g.
en ~p) (=þ1::3Q.. ~
(Ð 0 5. ::¡ S' g ..
3 ~ 0 (1) c: <11 ~
5·::3 0. co 0. C>.
~ft ôc.. s
0. 9- a
co ~
~
õ'
=
. "^K "'NTtu><~C.E.
D"~""'"
»
0-
CD
3
Q)r-
., ( )
_<0
CD ( )
:::J
OC-
o
C
:J
.:<
I
t I
j:
ffi 1/ ~ -- N. f!\NT~ W\JE..
PET. .- ~.',...--
Û(Ú!:A ).,
~.:ioN I ;" ,
It-'/c€ 1/1
... '/1
-iíí
l¡i
1/......
"......'.....
I ....~
': SJ'-A-I/'II
I} ::'l'¡,'/iI
, , c,qAJ/þ
" J RduÆ).
I
J.,
Il,
If,
"\...
//~@
1'1
, '
"
~/
~q
, .
I"
/~ô
~6" 'I ,..fiI
.< ,', ;:_-_-.:;-....... I
" .:' ," ~,' " ~ ~
" "'~" v,' \ \
...... .... .... '-I \
..... ~... " \~ \
;:/ <~Ó~;~,:
J)
,11/
I)
, )
<::)
'"
VI
o
I
~
-'-
C>
N
-....
~
o
N
V1
o
I
o
o
N
I
o
\J"1
r>
I
lJI
o
"
~
51Ä ,_--,-4'1' Dº-__. _-'-
~~
. <.
þ
· ".., :~
'" 1'¡.:O'LqJ.jJ
¡ QLf.J1D1·(,5.8)
,.
;. "; í
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE, 22902
November 30, 1994
D. S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
Board of Supervisors' Meeting
November 2, 1994
Ms. Ella W. Carey,
Albemarle Board of
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA
Clerk
Supervisors
22902
Dear Ms. Carey:
This is in reference to your letter dated November 9, 1994, regarding
transportation items discussed at the board of supervisors' meeting on November 2,
1994. The following outline will explain in more detail those items of which more
information has been requested.
#4 Owensville Road (Route 678)/Route 250 at the commercial area in Ivy. A
signal warrant analysis has been conducted. A traffic signal is not supported at
this time. During the twelve hour count, operational concerns were noted with the
turning movements allowed by the existing intersection configuration. The
Department presently proposes modifying the pavement markings and signing in
accordance with the attached sketch (Figure 1) The tentative schedule for this
work is spring 1995. We are currently working with Ms. Thomas to review possible
long-term solutions to this intersection, including review of a potential
primary-funded improvement project on Route 250. Such solution could in fact
include signalization when the ultimate geometrics are finalized.
Warrants used for the installation of flashers: Basically there are no
specific warrants for the installation of an overhead flasher other than safety
concerns. This may be best explained by specific examples. As one proceeds
westbound on Route 250 toward its intersection with Route 677, the motorist
encounters a vertical curve just east of the intersection. With the isolated nature
of this intersection, a full-operated signal in itself may violate motorist
expectations thereby increasing the potential for rear-end type collisions at the
stop condition point. Compounding the problem is any queue which develops in the
westbound direction backing up towards the crest thereby hampering the motorist's
reaction time to the signal-induced stop condition. At this particular
intersection, the existing accident history is not significant and may in fact
become more severe following a signal installation where the above described
conditions are prevalent (there are studies which have confirmed this phenomenon) .
It is the Department's stance that an emphasis on the impending conditions which the
motorist will encounter is needed rather than to stop all traffic and possibly
create more serious complications on the mainline (Route 250) than were present
under pre-existing conditions.
At the Route 250/678 intersection, operational concerns
prior to a flasher or traffic signal being installed. It is
should be addressed
considered most cost
~
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
~
Ms. Ella W. Carey
November 2, 1994, Board Meeting
Page 2
November 30, 1994
effective to review the need for a traffic signal concurrently with the need for
primary road improvements and the potential realignment of this intersection. In
any location where a signal is being considered, the Department must weigh all
factors in its decision as to whether a full-operation signal is the best option for
the conditions at hand. Presently, traffic signals at intersections Route 250/677
and Routes 250/678 are not supported until road improvements occur and/or additional
signal warrants are met.
Departmental policy regarding the application of gravel to roadways for
purposes of ordinary maintenance applies to all non-stabilized public roads. Public
requests for such maintenance should be directed to the appropriate VDOT maintenance
area headquarters listed in the phone book or to the main residency office at
293-0011. Priority will be given to these requests in accordance with relative
safety concerns and area headquarters general workloads. It is not necessary to
request support from one's local board of supervisor member for such action. Only
for purposes of supporting gravel road improvement prolects is one guided to contact
their board representative.
The Bellair Task Force will hold a meeting on Monday, December 5 at 4:00 p.m.
to discuss final improvements to the Routes 250/601 intersection/area.
The maintenance superintendents have been
regarding the cleaning of culverts after storms.
to these needs as soon as possible.
notified of the board's concern
They have been directed to attend
Should this information require additional explanation or clarification, I will
be available at the day meeting on December 7 to discuss any item. Thank you for
clarifying your concerns in writing. It is most appreciated.
Sincerely,
~I
A. G. Tucker
Assistant Resident Engineer
AGT/smk
attachments
cc: Area Superintendents
" ..... ,,~..' . ,'{')p' . '.,. "';l/";;:~¡¡;t,;ii;.@ \'j"þ;~¡:\~~" "i'i7'~r, "
. . .'.' ,.'. :..:' : .."..:. .... :;~·:r~.:~~~.t".·;;~¢:1~:~'.;~::'~}:'~~~i:~fr;:;~ ..... :~/i.t;¡g,~:;:,;,·
..z;l ré£,~ ¿-C "1'Af/Ñ (þ,c- '~~k·:.., :"\':.. ~:' ".. .
RtJi tilt!" Z S ()~IVLJ ":'...
/("~ ð?8
¡;,L,B~ØI1~ e~, .
~
~
'\
~
~
~
\
ß
1\J
~
a
~
~I
C'J
0..
c=.
G1
~
t'
-
~
~
~
'-
:i
~,
N
<It.
~
~
l·{l ~'íJf
\~~~ I'j fo OJ
\J\ ~~~~t\J
'tJ ~~
z
~
a <1-f7
(\ ,\
, ()
~~f' i' g
'. ~.~
.~'f
~
f~
~~
',.c.
..po
~ ç,,~
> c:F- <$'
~
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
(804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 972·4060
November 9, 1994
Charles S. Martin
Rrvanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
Ms. Angela Tucker
Acting Resident Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
P. O. Box 2013
Charlottesville, VA 22902-0013
Dear Ms. Tucker:
Following is a list of items from the Board of Supervisors' meeting on November 2, 1994:
Agenda Item No. 8a. Other Transportation Matters. Mrs. Tucker mentioned the location of several
traffic signal matters.
1 . The intersection of Route 250 West and Route 677 at the Ivy Nursery. Signal warrants
have not been met at that location, but a flasher will be installed there next spring on full
mast arms in anticipation of a signal being installed in the future.
2. Routes 635/240/250 where there is now a flasher. The intersection now warrants a full
signal which will be installed next spring.
3. Rio Road at Penn Park. That location does not meet all signal warrants at this time. There
is a problem with the right-hand turn out of Penn Park, and VDoT will install a right-turn
acceleration lane as far as the first entrance into Dunlora.
4. Owensville Road/Route 250 at the commercial area in Ivy. A signal analysis was performed
at that location. A signal is not warranted at this time. There is a problem with the "Y"
intersection from Route 678 into Route 250. VDoT would like to place signs on Route? so
it is a slip ramp onto Route 250 only, and cars be funneled off of Route 250 at ? point. At
one time, Route 678 was in the Secondary Road Improvement Plan, but VDoT is now
looking into Primary funding for improvements to Route 250. In the interim, the pavement
marking changes and signing improvements will be made this fall and winter. (Note: There
was no paperwork on this item. Can somebody fill in the blanks?)
Mr. Robert Tucker asked for the warrants used for installation of flashers. Mrs. Tucker said she did
not know. but could get that information.
RECEIVED
NOV 141994
*
CHARLOTTESVILLE. VA
RESIDENCE OFFICE
Printed on recycled paper
Ms. Angela Tucker
November 9, 1 994
Page 2.
Mrs. Thomas asked for information from VDoT as to what people are told in reply to requests for
gavel (which should be a maintenance item), and a report on what is happening on Route 718.
Mrs. Tucker mentioned that in reference to the question of abandoning Route 782 she has
scheduled a meeting in her office on November 14, 1994, at 10:00 A. M. to discuss the request.
Mr. Perkins asked about the Bellair/Route 250/Route 29 Bypass intersection. He asked that the
Board be kept informed of anything going on at this intersection.
Mr. Perkins said he understands the improvement at the intersection of Route 712 at Keene cannot
be improved because the property owners will not dedicate the right-of-way. Mrs. Tucker said that is
correct.
Mr. Perkins asked about improvements at the intersection of Routes 713/712. Mrs. Tucker said
that project is located just past the Highway Department's Keene Headquarters in conjunction with the
Kluge farm entrance, is proceeding.
Mr. Perkins said it has been suggested that Highway maintenance people be reminded to check
culverts after storms in order to clear them of debris.
Mrs. Thomas asked about the "rumble" strips on Route 250. Mrs. Tucker said this has to do with
the Bellair situation. The pavement is being cut prior to installation of "rumble" strips in order to alert
drivers to potential backups under the railroad overpass just prior to the Bellair Exxon and Bellair entrance.
This should allow the section between St. Anne's/Belfield and Route 601 to be opened again. After it has
been determined if all are satisfied with this change, VDoT will make a permanent modification and remove
all of the barricades. Modifications will need to be made to the slip ramp on the other side of the railroad
underpass at Route 250/Bellair where no left turn is allowed. It will probably be another month before this
is finalized.
Mr. Marshall thanked the Highway Department for fixing the shoulders of the road at the inter-
section of Avon Street with Route 20 South. He said it was a big improvement.
Mr. Marshall asked if he could meet with Mrs. Tucker and residents in Marshall Manor to discuss
the improvements where a temporary road was put in and trees were removed. Mrs. Tucker said they will
restore some trees in the area between now and the end of the year, if possible.
Mrs. Humphris mentioned a letter dated October 17, 1994, received from Mr. Robert A. Garland,
Jr., Secretary for the Board of the Canterbury Hills Association, regarding the revised southern end of
Alternative 10 of the Route 29 Bypass. This group in February, 1994 had "opposed relocating this
interchange from the approved Alternative 10 route and made suggestions for modifying this design to
lessen the impact on our neighborhood." When she brought this up some months ago, she thought the
Board agreed the Neighborhood Association would be given a seat on the Citizens Advisory Committee for
the Bypass. Mr. Tucker said the MPO should make that appointment. Motion was adopted to request the
MPO to make such an appointment.
~
Ms. Angela Tucker
November 9, 1994
Page 3.
Mr. Wilson Cropp of 769 Rocky Hollow Road was present again to make a plea that the road be
improved. Mr. Perkins said the Board had signed off on a list of items to be done last year. He suggested
that Mr. Cropp talk with Mr. Martin and Mrs. Tucker again about what might be done within existing right-
of-way with the funds set aside for this project.
If you have any questions about the items listed (some are just informational), please contact me at
296-5843.
Sincerely,
Ef~/<L/:~
Board of County Super~~~~
EWC:len
Attachment
t ~" tJ.. ~O'L' q J..f
,~,-: ~:^ Qtl.J1JJ1.(þ·q)
1,'" ~J
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902
D. S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
November 22, 1994
Route 743
Project 0743-002-153, C502
Albemarle County
Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Ms. Carey:
This is to advise that the advertisement date on the Hydraulic Road project
between Lambs Road and Rio Road has been revised. The ad date will change from the
current date of June 1995 to a tentative date of December 1995. This change is due
to revising an alignment in order to minimize the impact of construction on several
properties. If you have any questions, we are prepared to discuss this matter at
the next board meeting.
Please make this information available to the board members.
Sincerely,
M~lLcJÎM;
A. G. Tucker
Assistant Resident Engineer
GGU/smk
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
ìL
/2 ·(J'l ¡qif.
~ q4 .fi07 (5 'ID)
,.t~1j in:
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 2013
CHARLOTTESVILLE. 22902
D. S. ROOSEVELT
RESIDENT ENGINEER
November 22, 1994
Current Projects
Construction Schedule
Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Ms. Carey:
Attached find the monthly update on highway improvement projects currently
under construction in Albemarle County. Please see that this information is
forwarded to the Board of Supervisors members. I will be prepared to discuss this
matter with them at the next meeting if they so desire.
Sincerely,
~
A.- G. T;;cker
Assistant Resident Engineer
AGT/smk
attachment
cc: R. W. Tucker, Jr. w/attachment
David Benish w/attachment
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
ALBEMARLE COUNTY
DECEMBER 1, 1994
+ ------------ + ---------------------------------------------------- +---------------------------------------------------- +--------------------- +
I ROUTE I LOCATION STATUS I ESTIMATED I
I NO. I I I COMP.DATE I
+ ------------ + ---------------------------------------------------- +---------------------------------------------------- +--------------------- +
I I I
20 I FROM 3.4 MI. S. RTE. 53 I CONSTRUCTION 80% COMPLETE I DEC 94 *
I TO 3.8 MI. S. RTE. 53 I I
+ ------------ + ---------------------------------------------------- +---------------------------------------------------- +--------------------- +
I I I
29 I FROM HYDRAULIC ROAD I CONSTRUCTION 48% COMPLETE I DEC 95
I I TO NORTH OF RIO ROAD I I I
+ ------------ + ---------------------------------------------------- +---------------------------------------------------- + --------------------- +
I
I
I I I
+ ------------ + ---------------------------------------------------- + ---------------------------------------------------- +--------------------- +
I
I
I I
+ ------------ + ---------------------------------------------------- + ---------------------------------------------------- +--------------------- +
I
I
I I I I I
+ ------------ + ---------------------------------------------------- +---------------------------------------------------- + --------------------- +
I
I
I I I I I
+ ------------ + ---------------------------------------------------- + ---------------------------------------------------- +--------------------- +
I I I
I I I
I I I I I
+ ------------ + ---------------------------------------------------- +---------------------------------------------------- + --------------------- +
I I I
I I I
I I I I I
+ ------------ + ---------------------------------------------------- + ---------------------------------------------------- +--------------------- +
* REVISED DATE
** NEW PROJECT
CITY OF BEDFORD
A MAIN STREET CITY
'''',''1<1'''''':''< '- .Boaró: I.~OÎv~~ I)
.,.,."uu,vU !\I , 'Î 1V1. '5./
AjI~1J ~:~m ¡¡rìq1.j~L .
G. MICHAEL SHELTON
MAYOR
PHONE (703) 586-7101
FAX (703) 586-7134
November 21, 1994
The Honorable David P. Bowerman
Board of Supervisors, Chair
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
Dear Chairman Bowerman:
I take this opportunity to thank you for your recent resolution supporting Bedford, Virginia as the
location for the National D-Day Memorial Monument. Your expression of support was crucial in
the recent decision made by the National D-Day Memorial Foundation on the selection of a site.
I am pleased to announce to you that the Foundation has selected Bedford, Virginia as the
location for this most important memorial. The support of so many of the localities in Virginia
served by the 116th Infantry Regiment of the 29th Division had much to do with bringing this
decision about. Often, as elected officials we are asked to take positions on matters in which we
wonder what impact the position will truly have. In this case, clearly your support of Bedford as
the site for this memorial has paid off I thank you very much for your efforts and your positive
impact on this decision. Bedford, Virginia will be a proud and dignified location for this memorial
which will honor all service men and women in all branches of our armed forces who were
involved in this most famous military operation.
As a locality served by the 29th Division, 116th Infantry Regiment, you can feel a sense of pride
that a memorial to D-Day veterans will be constructed for all future generations to remember.
We will seek your input and involvement in bringing this effort to the point of dedication. All of
our communities were impacted by the D-Day invasion fifty years ago. It is clearly time that we
responsibly honor our veterans of this invasion and build on the educational importance of this
event.
Again, thank you very much for your support of Bedford as the site of the D-Day Memorial. You
will be hearing more from the Board of Directors of the National D-Day Memorial Foundation in
the future about detailed plans for the site that Bedford is providing.
With my best wishes, I am
Sincerely,
t1 ,,", ""
rL "'"
I /~.'i
"\/Ù;'.. ,/
lFl''/;.>;,···.
........ .
G. Michael Shelton
Mayor
GMS/df
"
,,;:-n¡;'i, :::,:, , "·5:U{-f'
' ·"i'L Ò1-_·~"f
¡., ,
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Status Report: Skateboard Park
AGENDA DATE:
December 7, 1994
IT~M NUMB~R:
q ·/2lf{.o-/'2)
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
Update on status of discussions between City and County Parks
and Recreation Department staff, area skateboarders, and interested
citizens on the development of a Skateboard Park.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION: X
AITACHMENTS:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Huff, and Mullaney
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
On September 19, 1994, City Council held a first reading on the issue of banning skateboarding from the Downtown Mall. In
response approximately 20 City and County skateboarders attended and voiced their concern over not having any place to skate.
In addition, Ms. Daria Brezinski, a Crozet resident, addressed Council and voiced her concern over the lack of a skateboard facility.
After learning that many of the mall skateboarders were County residents, Mayor Toscano suggested that the skateboarders also
express their concerns to the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors. Ms. Brezinski and the skateboarders did so at the September 21
meeting of the Board of Supervisors, As a result of these concerns expressed to Board and Council, the City and County Parks and
Recreation Department staff began meeting with Ms. Brezinski and the skateboarders to investigate the feasibility of a skateboard
facility to serve residents of Charlottesville and Albemarle County. At its October 3 meeting, City Council decided not to take action
on the skateboard ban and to revisit the issue if problems continue.
DISCUSSION:
Since this is a City\County concern and many of the skateboarders are teenagers, the Teen Center Director, Ms. Amy Smith, has been
asked to coordinate discussions on this issue for the City and County. It was explained early in the process to Ms. Brezinski and the
skateboarders that the City and County currently have no funds set aside for this purpose.
Furthennore, it was explained that any significant amount of money for the construction of such a facility would have to be requested
through the Capital Improvements Program. Ms. Brezinski has embarked on a fund raising effort and intends to have the entire facility
donated. The estimated cost of the skateboard facility is approximately $300,000. The facility can be scaled back to meet shortfalls in
funding. The City and County will be asked to provide the land for the facility. The facility will fit on a site of about 120' by 140' or
approximately 3/8 of an acre. The preferred site for the facility is McIntire Park. The secondary site is Towe Park. McIntire is
favored over Towe because of easier access by City skateboarder who don't drive. Also its in closer proximity to the Downtown Mall
and hopefully will help alleviate some ofthe problems currently being experienced there. Finally iflighting is desired in the future, it
appears a more likely possibility for that to occur at McIntire than Towe at this time.
·
The City will be asked at its December 19 meeting to commit a site at McIntire Park for the project. This commitment will be
contingent on the total cost of construction being donated. The commitment is also contingent on the City and County approving
operating funds for the facility during the 95-96 operating budget process. It has been made clear that no construction may begin at
any City or County park property until such time as there has been a commitment made by the City and County for operating funds.
The estimated annual operating budget for the facility is approximately $23,000. At this time it is anticipated that the cost will be
shared equally by the City and County and possibly operated under the Teen Center program. It is expected that at least half of the
operating expenses and possibly more could retWll to the City and County if a daily fee is charged. Costs associated with salaries
($13,800) and insurance ($6800) make up 90% of the estimated operating budget. Such a facility would not be covered by the
County's general liability policy. The County's insurance consultant has located coverage that will provide $1,000,000 in liability
protection. Insurance coverage can only be secured if the facility is supervised when open and secured when closed. The policy
would have a $500 deductible and make no medical payments for injuries which would occur unless the City and County were
determined to be liable.
RECOMMENDATION:
The potential donors are interested in making a commitment to this project as soon as possible to take advantage of current tax laws.
Ms. Brezinski feels that it is critical to the fund raising effort to have a commitment of City or County land for the project by the end
of December. It is understood that this commitment would be contingent on the City and County incurring no development costs and
the approval of operating funds by both localities in the 95-96 budget. Since the preferred site for the facility is McIntire Park, no
action by the Board is necessary at this time. However, if the City tWllS down the use of McIntire Park, the Towe Park Committee will
need to meet and make a decision on committing land at Towe Park for this purpose.
SKA TEBOA.
94.169
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
October 1994 Financial Report
AGENDA DATE:
December 7, 1994
ACTION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
October 1994 Financial Report for the General Fund, School Fund,
and Fund Balance
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Walters
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
Attached is the October 31, 1994 Monthly Financial Report for the General and Education Funds.
;)! :.: ') -'\-;~>:1 ~'r) fA!~~r.:'r.::J"'..
./:2' 0 . '. ".J.....
....,204-
~ -....--,,"....
ITEM NUMBER: ,J "\
qlf· 17..O'.l· (5 ./I'f-J
INFORMA nON:
INFORMATION: X
Projected General Fund expenditures have not been revised at this time.
Projected General Fund revenues are based on collections through September. They were revised in October.
Projected Education revenues have been increased $241,500 for an estimated additional 161 students.
Projected Education expenditures have been reduced. The School Board reduced the holdback of certain discretionary accounts ITom 7 1/2%
to 3% at its October 10 meeting. The new holdback is $228,057, a reduction of$342,084.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the acceptance of the October 1994 Financial Report.
940CTRPT.WP5
94.172
I
C/J
Z....
S2a:
<0
a:Q,,~
wWO)
Q"a:0)
0...J....
>~...:
....OCt)
zZa:
::><w
oZm
oi!O
w>....
...J...JO
a:J:0
<....
:ez
wO
m::E
...J
<
~
*' *' *' *' *'1* ~ * *' *' *'I*' *' *' ~ *
0 &>
" C'II 10 0) V" C? Ct) C? V 0<0 or- C? 0
.... ..., q CX) 0) 0 (00) " 0 0> ~ 0>0> ~ 0> C? (0
Z 0 0 V 0 CX) ~..t V cO 10 0 VV V C'II V ..t
w a: or- C'II or- C'II .... <0 .... C? C'II C'II C'II C'II C'II
° Q"
-
a: Q
w ~
Q"
~ll I I
~"~
LOCX)v
ui'C'II.· æ
<00
cx)C'IIO
"¡"..<O
,... .,...
~Oll -
0> 0 0 10 ~~ " OI~1 0 0 0101 I ;
10 C? " 10 10
~ " 0 o 0
W 0 Ò C'i a5 CX)
(!J C? or- ~ C'II C'II
<O~ C'II ~ C'II
Z or- CX)~
< iß- ....
J:
°
Q
I6UJ
.0>......... ... .
·...~..........·.....·.O>
.d)·.W··
............,
>00
%Q:
. .0...
Q
W
........
:!!:W
a:(!J
Q"c
0::>
a:m
Q"
Q"
<
0> or- 1.0 C? "~ 1.0 C'IIi"
<Oor-LOvCX)(O<OC\I
vC?vO"OO....
~.:. ,-~<:-~:-,:::~",<" .:.' ,<"'>ci)-
O>CX) .<O.fòC'll~<o·"
o .v '<t .... <0 Ct) 0)
'¢.. V "!. ',,:" (0 C'II CX)
0) 1.0" . C'II
<0 C'II Ct) Lt)
iß- 0 0
"f"!" .....
10... . 0.. O..!.Ll).!
OCX)CX)<O
or-"CX)"
C\i"":Ll)o>
CX) 10· OC?
or-Ll)C'IIO)
r.ti"¡CX)N
C'II .C?
o or- 10 CX) V~ CX) C'II! 0
or-or-Ll)OOCX)<OLt)
OC?'<tC?O>O)OO
a)ai<tSc.ôOOC?~
"vvLO<O <0
"VC'IILl)"O)C'IIIt)
- - - " 0
" 1.0" - C'II ~
~ C'II Õ 0
or- or-
10 0 O! Ll)!
OCX)CX)<O
or-"CX)"
C\i"":Ll)O>
CX)Ll)OC?
or-Ll)C'IIO>
ui"¡CX)"
C'II C?
C/J
W
::>
Z
W
>
W
a:
C/J
en a:
o ~
o Z C/J
Z::> C/J Z
::> u. w <
u. _ c¡ ::> a:
~~~ Z....
a:0~ ~ZJ:
WO< W-!::
ZJ:~ a:~~
~~:J -J...JW...J
__en «u.<
-J-Jlwa:....en....
«u.I-WOZO
OO-J«O....«I-
OOWI-W a:
-J-Jenenu. I-
en
Z I-
o Z
I- W
« ~
a: Z
w a:
0- W
o >
I- 0
Z-J c¡
W« -J
~I- «
ZZ a:
a:W W
W~ ~
ð~ c¡
(!J«en...J
-JO-a:«
«WWI-
a:0U.0
Wlenl-
ZZ~~
WOa:en
C¡ZI-
C/J
W
C/J
Z
W
Q"
X
W
C?... . .10. ....1... ..CX)..~......
"Ll)C'II
"vC'II
g~¡f¡
CC!. C'II < CX)
OLO·Ll)
(0 <0
o 101 Ll)~
c?Ll)CX)
CX)'<tC'll
r'<OV
<0 V or-
cx)_C'II or-
010<0
<0 <0
Z
en 0
Zenø
QOS:;
I-Z-
«::>0
a:u.-J
Wc¡O
O-ZO
O-I
o~O
Z«en
::>I-...J
u.en«
-J::>I-
OenO
011-
u.CD
I-J::>
OWen
en en
Ct)
0)
0)
It)
C\I
CX)
Ct)
o
....
i
o
It)
o
~
It)
o
~
o
....
~I
C/J
W
C/J
Z
W
Q"
X
W
...J
<
....
o
....
C/J
W
C/J
Z
W
0-
X
W
a:
w
>
o
C/J
W
:J
Z
W
>
w
a:
u.
o
w
°
Z
<
...J
<
r:c
e
z
:J ....
LL e::
..J 0
< D.. ð)
e:: W
W e:: en
Z ..J ....
W <
~ Õ ....
'"
~ z e::
z < W
:J Z m
0 u:: 0
(.) > ....
..J (.)
W :I: 0
..J ....
e:: z
< 0
:::::IE :::::IE
W
m
..J
<
1-'
zO
we::
OD..
e::-
We
D..!;:
.dW····
œ~
c<
IJJ(::I
:>-0
....
e
Ww
....~
(.)z
W<
':I:
~(.)
D..
o
,,)1.1.1
0)<....
-0
Iw··
""'....................""').
....0
u..a: ..
Q.;
e
W
........
:!!:w
e::~
D..e
O:J
e::m
D..
D..
<
***'*'*'*'
......C\lC\I....8C\1
~~~en .co
o.....coci°e\i
.....C\I.........~....
10 .~ 01· ~ CO! "'~
. v,,· co 'It. v CI)
. . C\l0 '" <c en It)
~ . -...":1'......-. .~......."..-...§.....~.
,,~ ..- <c
~T'-·tÞ.....CI)
en íÕ "'~" 0 1 "I
IO(OCO" "
v......COIt) It)
gò.....~ ....
(O~ 0 0
- co co
..... -
ø ........
0) 0> "'! T'" (OJ ......1
~_(I()v_~~-a;~
o)~I.O~è!co
¡(\ ~a)v'lt
-- co '"
~Il) .,,;.....co
ø ""
OVO!'It(O!O
.....I.OOCOv....
OC\l 1.0 ,,0) "
aî~"'a)v'lt
...... CO..... ,,(0 'It
":C\!.C\lC\lv"
......1.0 cr).....'It
~ ""
en
W
:J
Z
W
>
W
e::
en
e::
W
LL
en
en z
W <
:Jze::
z-....
WC/):I:
>a:,--
....JWW!:::
«e::LL~
~wffi..J~..J
u~o~oCt:~
Ol-Woa:o
....JC/)LL....I-....
,0 ,0 ~ ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ~ ~I..ø
0' 0' 0 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0 0 ø'
C\I(OI.OC\I(')OI.O(OVOco
(OOl.OvO)OCOl.OvO)O)
LÖC\ÏO)O)MLÖ~C\ÏO..t~
(')(')(')C\I(')C\I(')v C\I
o ...... (0 (I) C\I <.0 ...... 0> C\I 01 "'It~
co .......... ..........(I)C\I V0)8'1t
CO'lt....C\lO)C\I......oo <it
u>Ñ«i«i«f"":"':";ÒC\lc
1.O(O.....vO)OCOOC\lO......
I.O~ "If" o. co 1.0_ C\!. co en "If" co
..... (') ..... en co
....
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0101
V... ...... (') .('). (0 10.... ...... .....0... O....i..o..
(')C\lVC\lC\lvv.....coco....
CO.....(O(').....O>O>...........CO......
,.; C\Î ....: ri ......- ..; u> .¢ .,..: I.O~
COV(,)OOOOC\lI.OO
~ v-. ~ C\!. ":co. ": ..-_1.0. C\I ......
v..-......C\I vCOC\lC\l"lf" CO 'It
(') ......
v...... (') (') (0 1.0.......... 0 0io
(') C\I VC\lC\lV v..... coco....
CO.....(O(').....O>O>...........CO......
~C\Î...:ri~..;u>.¢.....-1.O v
(OV(')OOOOC\lI.OO
~ v. (0. C\!. ....... ~ ....... ...... ~ C\I ~
v..-......C\lv(OC\lC\lvCO'lt
(') ......
en
W
en
z
W
D..
~
Z
°
~ W C/)
« a: I- ~
a: :Jz
t>ô ~w æ
Z~ I-:J~ D..
-oCt: Z ua.. X
~a: W zo....J W
01- ~ omoCt: ~
«~ a.. ¡::>~ z
!:-Z>-C/)0 «ww -
>~I-:X:::....J wo~ ~
° Wa:W a:>-I- e::
CJ~~oGjozu!::a:~w
~....JC/)3:o_~Z~WD..
a:~uUZ~---:JWLLO
W~:J:JoCt:u~~o~..J
zomm~:Ja:~zoCt:oCt:
W:J:J:J:Jo oCt: ° oa:o....
CJ.a..a..IWa..UZI-
....
I
;
j
~I
C/)
w
C/)
z
w
a..
~
a:
w
>
o
en
w
:J
Z
W
>
w
e::
LL
o
W
(.)
Z
oCt:
....J
oCt:
m
e
z
:J I-
U. a:
...J 0
0 D.. ..
W
0 a: Ø)
:I: Ø)
0 ~ ....
UJ ....
> ë3 tv)
I- ~ a:
z w
:J z m
0 u:: 0
0 > I-
W ...J 0
...J :I: 0
a: I-
< Z
:i 0
w :i
m
...J
<
1-'
zO
wa:
oD..
a:-
we
D..~
?ft.?ft.?ft.I~?ft.~
C\lIt)Ocol'-tv)
co It) 0 1'-"....
"":aió '..,.: ,
C\IC\I coC\lco
C\I C\I
?ft.?ft.êfl.?ft.êfl.êfl.?ft.
co (')1t)C\lC\lO....
C\I.....co v(') v It)
"":ó",,:,,,,:cricci..,.:
C\lv(')(')lt)vC\l
e
Ww
1-c:J
Oz
w<
':I:
~()
D..
i
00 010 010~
0~ 0 0
. It) It)
,.... ~_: ~
v .. ..
C\I C\I C\I
õõR"õo oll¡:::-
.....I'-CO..... II)
~~~"!. 0
(')vO)O co
~t::..~~ C\I
C\I
J
.....VVj(7 .....~O~
.....It)OU)COtv)
(')It)VC\lOtv)
í~~~g·~ ~
C\I .1'-
C\I e')(')....
C\I co
co co 0)...... co (') ¡ ..tv)I.
Ol'-O)COOOl'-
....CO.....(')(')....I'-
C\ÏÔ..to)cx)lt)(7
It) 1'-1'-0) 0 (') tv)
"t.. or: It). "!. .... 0 co
COC\lv<.O .....0
v co
j
-VT~n u~-~ll ~I
.....It)OcoCOtv) .....vcocnoOtv)
(')0 v 1'-0 co vIt)COIt)(')....co
e cx)a)I'-oti(') I'- LÔ LÔ C'i 0) co· It) I'-
W vCOvCOOCO VVOC\lO(')co
1-1- v "!.1t)C\I CO co It). "!. co. ('). ..... 0 co
::!w 0C\1 .1'- COC\lvCO .....0
C\I tv)(')0
a:c:J C\I co v co
D..e
O:J
a:m
D..
D..
<
Z UJ
W
I 0 UJ
~ w¡::: Z
....J o<t W
<t 0 D..
w(/)z_ ~
ILU<t!:!:,
·ozo
~5<ëO UJ a:
za:~~ LU W
<tLU~-- UJ >
o(/)<tz z 0
UJ zz~Q W UJ
a: LUO--~ D.. W
W ~-ðo >< :J
U. ~~ ::> W z
UJ <t<t¡:::a:
(/) UJ Z .~<t~ c:J W
....J W < za:a:(/) Z >
0 :Jza: OOLUZ I- W
0 z-I- z¡:::Q..Q..O < a:
I W(/):I: O<t~oo(/)a: u.
UJ o >a:l- UJ ¡:::a: (/)(/)a:W 0
w (/) ....Jww- W o~a:WWWD.. W
:J I ~a:u.3: UJ ::>_~¡:::¡:::U.O 0
z ....JLU (/) a:~....J::J::J~....J
<t~LU...JZ...J Z Z
W o<to¡5<t¡5 W ~~ã:ÜÜ<t¡5 <
> D.. ...J
W O~LUOa:O >< z°::><t<ta:o <
....J(/)U.I-~I- _<tQ..u.u.~
a: W ~ m
- --- -
co 0 NOO gjl i
CO N 000
(!) 0> COO 0 1',
...J I' N- O- l{) - ctf ~
<0 CO r-(\')r-
0 <D r- --
!::2 "... - -
Q.::J "...
<LL. ~
0
- -
l{) <D (!): ~j
CO r- T-!
V r- ,....1
...J (!) CO- CO'
00 0> 0>1
I' I'
02 "... - 1', (\')
J:::J - ~I
"...
OLL. ~
CJ)
CJ)
2
0 --- -
-I- "... O(\')N ~I ~II
1-0: (!) aNN
~ov (!) 00>0 ~ I'J¡
l{)- l{)- V-
LUQ.O> "... NO(\,) ~
Q.LUO> ...J Lt) O>(\,)N
00:"': <0 0 ---
('I)
~LU"'" 0:2 "... ~
0('1) LU::J ~
220: ffiLL.
::J:5LU ~
o<~
OeD I-
LUOO
æ20 ,. 0
<::J 0: W CJ)
:ELL. < I- Z
LU 2 W 0
eD CJ
...J :E 0 CJ) I-
< ::¡ => 0 <C
LU co Z 0:
0: .. I => Q.
Q. CJ)CJ) LL 0
- cr:cr: 0:
2z WW
v 00 >1- Q.
0> 1-- OZ Q.
I <I- >-W <
0 _<C cr:O 0
(\') o:ffiCJ)cr:zo
I W
(!) Q.a..z<CO<C >
0 00001-0 0
W 0: -~<ccr: cr: W
Q.cr:I-Ooz
0 Q.US<Ccr:=>~ Q. 0
2 <>-g:LL.OO a.. 2
<C
:5 Ol-Ol-WI- ...J :5
<C LUZcr:CJ)>-~ < <
eD >Wa..W<C I- eD
Ocr:a..:Jcr:cr: 0
0 o:cr:<CO§O I- 0
2 Q.=>WW W 2
::J Q.Ocr:cr:~CJ =>
LL. < LL.
.
·
,
,
; if ;~'\MJ i1.~Œ:.90-
~"7?: q'l·f1.O']:Z5·/5)
Acme
I
Tel: 804·823·4351
Fax: 804-823-1625
Design Technology, Co.
1000 Allview Drive, Craze!, VA 22932
November 22, 1994
Ms. Ella W. Carey
Clerk of Board of Supervisors
County of Albemarle
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Ms. Carey:
The following is Acme Design Technology, Co.'s October 1994 operating results:
Sales & Marketina
Our October bookings were slightly ahead of our revised July plan. Our bookings were
$705,018 vs. a plan of $663,000. Note the next three charts. Looking at Chart #3, 10
months 93 vs. 10 months 94, the improvements in the overall, tracking 8.3% ahead of
1993 bookings.
I October 1994 I
Products Plan Actual Variance
DataVue $ 8,000 $ 9,642 $ 1,642 20.5%)
Visible Steel $ 60,000 $ 48,243 ($11,757) (19.6)
Product Service $ 30,000 $ 62,834 $32,834 109.5%
Storage Products $400,000 $410,310 $10,310 2.6%
FreighUMisc. $ 15,000 $ 23,329 $ 8,329 55.5%
OEM $150,000 $150,660 $ 660 .4%)
Totals: $663,000 $705,018 $42,018 6.3%
I October 1994 - Year-To-Date I
Products Plan Actual Variance
DataVue $ 80,000 $ 57,107 ($ 22,893) (28.6%)
Visible Steel $ 820,000 $ 580,415 ($ 239,585) (29.2%)
Product Service $ 500,000 $ 419,040 ($ 80,960) (16.2%)
Storage Products $4,172,000 $3,174,508 ($ 997,492) (23.9%)
FreighUMisc. $ 110,000 $ 180,500 $ 70,500 64.1%
OEM $1,035,000 $1,224,292 $ 189,292 18.3%
Totals: $6,717,000 $5,635,862 ($1,081,138) (16.1%)
..
10 Months 1993 vs. 10 Months 1994
Products 10 Mo. 1993 10 Mo. 1994 Variance
DataVue $ 70,145 $ 57,107 ($ 13,038) (18.6%)
Visible Steel $ 852,690 $ 580,415 ($272,275) (31.9%)
Product Service $ 484,024 $ 419,040 ($ 64,984) (13.4%)
Storage Products $3,029,892 $3,174,508 $144,616 4.8%
Freight/Misc. $ 144,732 $ 180,500 $ 35,768 24.7%
OEM $ 621,734 $1,224,292 602,558 96.9%
Totals: $5,203,217 $5,635,862 $432,645 8.3%
The following is our quote log for October and YTD:
Month
Total
Quotes
Received
QuoteLogSumrnary
Total
Unworkable Workable
Quotes Quotes
Quotes
Turned
Into PO's
Dates
PO's
Received
Oct. 94
63
1 62
13
1/Apr. 94
1/May 94
2/Aug. 94
8/Sep. 94
1/0ct. 94
YTD 94:
761
34 727
115
15.8%
Looking at our numbers through year end, we should end the year with bookings up
about 12% over 1993. My hope was that we would be able to accomplish 15% to 20%
improvement.
Manufacturina. Materials & Eauipment
I believe our costs will continue to improve as we que the material in front of the machine
operators and keep the employees in their stations working. With our latest changes in
the materials organization, we have noted some improvements. Now we must work on
training our supervisors. At the most, only one has had formal supervisory training. We
are bidding jobs, establishing a standard or rate that is expected to be accomplished per
hour from the operators. The supervisors are not holding the operators accountable for
the rate to make us a profitable company. The supervisors are not strong enough to tell
the employee what is required. I will keep you advised of our actions.
Our material position is good. We are watching our increases and managing them tightly.
Our physical inventory will not take place until year end. We discussed taking it at the
end of October but we need the manufacturing time.
Enaineering & Qualitv
Our engineering load remains high but I really believe we are gaining on the pile of
projects before us. Never enough time for an engineer though. Last month I talked
about our mistakes that cost us. We certainly have a ways to go to correct this problem.
Far too many of our employees are only looking for a paycheck. They don't feel
responsible for what they produce or the cost to the company. Again, I believe the
problem goes back to their inability to read and write and handle information properly. I'm
~
not sure many of our employees could make it with a Fortune 500 company. At one time
they were with American Brands but I believe between the factory employees and the
mangement the team was at best marginable when Brands sold the business.
OEM
Our OEM business remains strong. We need to get someone on the road selling our
abilities. I am not getting accomplished what we can make happen. We do not have
anyone inside that I can send out. I must spend at least three to four days a month in the
field. As you can see, our business in OEM is up almost 100% over last year.
Financials
Our over-eO-day accounts have increased in October:
Days:
0-30
$566,220
39.7%
31-60
$359,187
25.1%
61-90
$212,237
14.9%
91-999
$289,960
20.3%
Total
$
%
$1,427,604
100%
Note Attachment A for complete details of the major over-gO-day accounts.
Other
Enclosed is an announcement on our new national Director of Sales & Marketing. I will
go into the details of the organizational changes next month. I have also enclosed our
current headcount report.
Sincerely,
AC~ DESIGN TEC~NÎ~j. HNO OGY, CO.
c=cJd-ÌJ, uq
Thomas D. Hall
President
ahd
Enclosures
ATTACHMENT A
October 31,1994
1. Absolute Filing Solutions $ 15,336 Former master distributor.
2. Albany Medical Center $ 41,940 Building not completed. Have received over $70,000
in payment.
3. Commercial Products Company $ 21,352 Has been turned over to a collection agency. Suite in
process.
4. Dormitory Authority $ 3,448 Installation issues to be resolved.
5. Hagiazo-Systematic Storage $ 64,239 Judgment issued for Acme. Earning 10% interest.
6. Innovative Business Systems $ 1,949 Slow pay. Will work out.
7. J. H. Montague & Associates $ 6,823 New product delayed at factory.
8. LFI Associates $ 5,353 Slow pay. Turned over to collection.
9. Medical Forms & Equipment $ 11,446 Have personal guarantee. Attorney is working on.
Seeking judgment.
10. New England Visible $ 7,540 $1000/month plus commissions. Will work out.
11 . Osborne Office Systems $ 26,449 We have picked up product from this account that
has not been credited as yet. Will not cover total
due Acme.
12. Plug-In Storage Systems $ 8,615 OEM account that is slow pay. Will take more time
to get under control.
13. SES Contract $ 3,074 Slow pay. Working out with an attorney on
collections.
14. Star Production Services $ 9,305 Judgment issued for $16,000.
15. Turner Construction Company $ 25,688 Acme has been paid for product. This is installation
money that will be passed on to our dealer when
complete and collected.
16. University of North Carolina $ 16,831 Dealer has not completed installation.
17. U. S. Fish & Wildlife $ 4,755 Dealer layout incorrect. Will supply more equipment.
(Will pay.) Should see payments in next two months.
18. Wright Office Furniture $ 10.576 Slow pay. Has now been paid.
Sub Total: $284,719 98.2%
Grand Total: $289,960 100%
Acme
Tel: 804-823-4351
Fax: 804-823-1625
Design Technology, Co.
1000 Allview Drive, Craze!, VA 22932
November 22, 1994
TO: T. HALL
FROM: K. LANDES
RE: HEADCOUNT
10/31/94
Salaried: 33
Hourly: 57
Part Time: 1
Temporary: 10
TOTAL: 101
'tv
Acme
Tel: 804-823-4351
Fax: 804-823-1625
Design Technology, Co.
1000 Allview Drive, Croze!, VA 22932
To: Acme Dealers
Date: November 16, 1994
Bruce Chase Appointed
National Director of Sales & Marketing
for High Density Filing & Storage Products,
and Visible Products
Acme Design Technology, Co. is very pleased to announce the appointment of
Bruce Chase as our new Director of Sales & Marketing. Bruce brings a wealth of
experience and industry knowledge to the Acme management team.
As part of the Direct Line management team, Bruce helped build sales signifi-
cantly over the past seven years. His final assignment with Direct Line was
Executive Vice President. Prior to Direct Line, Bruce served as National Sales
Manager for Stacor.
Bruce has a strong commitment to customer service and the development of a
national marketing plan. Bruce has proven experience and a broad knowledge
of both the commercial and government filing and storage markets. His priority
is to support the Acme dealer group, create new business opportunities and
establish long term profitable partnerships.
Acme Design Technology, Co. continues to grow and mature, and the appoint-
ment of Bruce Chase underscores Acme's commitment to quality, service, cus-
tom design, and on-time delivery. Please join Tom and myself in welcoming
Bruce to the Acme team.
Please feel free to call either myself or Tom at any time with special concerns or
suggestions. We look forward to record sales in the months ahead from our
committed Acme support team and our dedicated dealers.
~~.#
Thomas D. Hall
President
;/J~ tv /=;I/cúú
Deanna L. Hall
Vice President Strategic & Product Planning
ahd
~
,
ACME DESIGN TECHNOLOGY, CO.
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
Pursuant to the Security Agreement dated as of January 28, 1993, and as
amended as of August 19, 1994 (the "Agreement") between ACME DESIGN
TECHNOLOGY, CO., (the "Company") and NATIONSBANK OF VIRGINIA,
N.A, the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies as follows:
1. The Company is in compliance with all terms, covenants, and
conditions of the Agreement that are binding upon the Company.
Compliance with the financial covenants as of the statement dated
October 31, 1994 is outlined below:
(a) Quick Ratio. Maintain a ratio of (i) cash ulus accounts
receivable to (ii) Current Liabilities of not less than 1.0 to 1.0 as
of the end of the Fiscal Month ending July 31, 1994, and at all
times thereafter.
Cash
Accounts Receivable
Total
$ 35,573
+ 1,274,326
$ 1. 309.899
Current Liabilities
$ 1.145.640
Ratio:
1.14
(b) Current Ratio. Maintain a ratio of Current Assets to Current
Liabilities of not less than 1.9 to 1.0 as of the end of the Fiscal
Month ending July 31, 1994, and at all times thereafter.
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
$ 2,362,329
$ 1,145,640
Ratio:
2.06
(c) Leverage Ratio. Maintain a ratio of Senior Indebtedness
to Adjusted Tangible Net Worth as of the last day of each
Fiscal Quarter, of not more than the ratio set forth opposite
such Fiscal Quarter.
Fiscal Quarter Ending
Ratio
9/30/94
12/31/94
3/31/95
3.25 to 1.0
3.25 to 1.0
3.00 to 1.0
lab '¡:word\ llm\mJac \aomo.oc
11/1/94 11:30 AM
6/30/95
9/30/95
12/31/95
3/31/96 and each
Fiscal Quarter end
thereafter
Total Liabilities
Subordinated Debt
Total
Net Worth
Intangibles
Subordinated Debt
Adj. Tang. Net Worth
Ratio:
2.75 to 1.0
2.50 to 1.0
2.25 to 1.0
2.0 to 1.0
$ 2,426,411
400.000
$ 2,026,411
$ 437,002
97,697
+ 400,000
$ 739,305
2.74
(d) Debt Service Ratio. Not permit its Debt Service Ratio for any
period set forth below, ending on the last day of each Fiscal
Quarter to be less than the ratio set forth opposite such period:
A1>Dlicable Period
7/1/94 to 12/31/94
1/1/95 to 3/31/95
1/1/95 to 6/30/95
1/1/95 to 9/30/95
1/1/95 to 12/31/95
1/1/96 to 3/31/96 and each
respective 6-Fiscal Month,
9-Fiscal Month, 12-Fiscal
Month and 3-Fiscal-Month
Period thereafter beginning
on the first day of the Fiscal
Year and ending on the last
day of each Fiscal Quarter
Ratio
1.0 to 1.0
1.0 to 1.0
1.15 to 1.0
1.30 to 1.0
1.30 to 1.0
Net Income (7011 - 10/31/94)$ 51.506
Depreciation & Amort. + 35,640
Other Noncash Charges +
Other Noncash Credits
Cash Flow $ 87,146
lab \¡:word\ hm\mi ",,\acme...
I 111104 11:30 AM
CMLTD
Cap. Lease Pymts
Fixed Charges
$ 88.410
+ 2 .808
$ 91, 218
Ratio:
.96
(e) CaDital Expenditures. Not make or permit any Subsidiary to
make Consolidated Capital Expenditures at any time during the
respective applicable periods set forth below, if the Consolidated
Capital Expenditures would exceed the amount set forth
opposite each such applicable period.
A1:>Dlicable Period
1/1/94 - 12/31/94 and
each calendar year
thereafter
Amount
$50,000
Applicable Period: 1/1 - 10/31/94
Net Fixed Assets at start of period:
Net Fixed Assets at end of period:
Depreciation changed during period:
Capital Expenditures during period
$ 443,824
-382.870
+ 62,994
$ 2,040
(f) Tangible Net Worth. Maintain a Tangible Net Worth as of
September 30, 1994 and December 31,1994, of not less than the
amount set forth opposite such date.
Date
September 30, 1994
December31, 1994
Reauired
$199,000
$249,000
Actual
$ 199,042
$
2. The representations and warranties of the Company set forth in the
Agreement and all representations and warranties which are
contained in any certificate, document, or financial or other statement
furnished pursuant to or in connection with the Agreement are true
and correct on and as of the date hereof with the same effect as if made
on the date hereof.
lab \g:word\jhm \rniac \ncmo.cc
11/11943:01 PM
3. The Borrowing Base (as defined in the Agreement) as of
October 31, 1994 calculated in accordance with the
Agreement, is shown on the Schedule annexed hereto and the
Borrowing Base is equal to or exceeds to aggregate principal amount of
~;e:~an outstanding to (theZ~anZt
Title:
President
Dated: Jb;. ;<;<j /r91
I
lab \¡:word\jhm \mi oc\a.clTlð.cc
11/1/94 11:30 AM
ACME DESIGN TECHNOLOGY, CO.
Schedule to Borrowing Base Certificate
Computations are as of 10/31/94
I. COMPUTATION O~' NET SECURITY
VALUE OF INVENTORY
INVENTORY (valued at lower
of cost or FMV at FIFO)
LESS:
Inventory charged off
or written down as
unsaleable
Other unqualified
Inventory
ELIGIBLE INVENTORY
NET SECURITY VALUE. - INVENTORY
$ 864',999.66
$( )
$(
$ 864,999.66
X .50
$ 432,499.83
II. COMPUTATION OF NET SECURITY
VALUE OF ACCOUNTS
TOTAL ACCOUNTS $ 1,427,603.96
LESS:
Affiliate or Employee
Accounts $( )
Accounts not Invoiced $( )
Accounts more than 90
days past due $ ( 289,959.69 )
Disputed Accounts $( )
Insolvent Debtor Accounts $( )
Foreign Accounts $( )
Consignment Accounts $ ( )
Government Accounts $( )
Unshipped Accounts $( )
. Other unqualified
Accounts $(
ELIGIBLE ACCOUNTS $ l,137,644.27
x .75
NET SECURITY VALUE - ACCOUNTS $ 853,233.20
III. BORROWING BASE VALUE
Net Security Value - Inventory $ 432,499.83
Net Security Value - ~ccounts $ 853,233.20
Total Net Security·Value $ 1,285,733.03
, .
(~
Page
.~ :~
11/18/94 3:36:45 mass1e Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
For Periods Ending OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
BALANCE SHEET
This Period Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Description Balance Balance Last Period This Period Last Year
------------------------ ----------- --. ---------- .--------- ----------- ----------------
CURRENT ASSETS
CASH 35,572.74 33,533.65 2,039.09 32,016.72 3,556.02
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
INSTALLMENT RECEIVABLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - CUST 427,603.96 355,760.67 71,843.29 ,298,332.48 129,271.48
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - COVT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
RESERVE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCTS (146,041.52) 146,041.52 0.00 (116,131.13 (29,910.39)
RESERVE FOR EST CREDIT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE CONTRA (7,236.44) (7,236.44 0.00 (28,404.47 21,168.03
---------------- --- ---------- .--------- .---------- ----------------
TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 1,274,326.00 202,482.71 71,843.29 153,796.88 120,529.12
INVENTORY
FINISHED GOODS 181,124.56 181,524.74 (400.18 241,076.69 (59,952.13)
FINISHED PARTS 425,232. 17 368,091.66 57, 140.51 683,017.54 (257,785.37)
WORK IN PROCESS 176,266.87 171,113.77 5,153.10 30,907.16 145,359.71
RAW MATERIALS 258,642.93 311,526.34 52,883.41 601,690.59 (343,047.66)
FACTORY SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CAPITALIZED INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
INVENTORY CONTRA ACCOUNT (87,945.75 (87,945.75 0.00 927,987.71 840,041.96
--------------- --- ---------- --------- ---------- ----------------
TOTAL INVENTORY 953,320.78 944,310.76 9,010.02 628,704.27 324,6.16.51
OTHER CURRENT ASSETS .
ADVACES TO EMPLOYEES 1,950.00 3,200.00 (1,250.00 3,425.45 (1,475.45)
TRANSPORTATION CLAIMS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER RECEIVABLES 31,159.30 33,344.80 (2,185.50 41,899.49 (10,740.19)
NOTE RECV - RELATED PARTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
NOTE RECV - CUSTOMER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
NOTE RECV - EMPLOYEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
INTEREST RECV-RELATED PRTY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 66,000.00 66,000.00 0.00 0.00 66,000.00
--------------- --- ---------- --------- ---------- ----------------
TOTAL OTHER CURRENT ASSETS 99,109.30 102,544.80 (3,435.50 45,324.94 53,784.36
--------------- --- ------ -- --------- --------- --------------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 2,362,328.82 2,282,87 92 79,456.90 859.842.8 502.486.0
2
Page
, '!
1/18/94 3:40:39 massie Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
For Periods Ending OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co.
BALANCE SHEET
This Period Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Description Balance Balance Last Period This Period Last Year
------------------------ ---------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
NOTES RECV - RELATED PARTIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT
LAND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
IMPROVEMENTS TO LAND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
BUILDINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 452,956.55 452,956.55 0.00 443,967.00 8,989.55
FURN, FIXT & OFF MACHINES 34,840.67 34,840.67 0.00 34,094.00 746.67
EQUIP. UNDER CAPITAL LEASES 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00
TRUCKS & AUTOS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CONSTRUCTION IN PROCESS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
---------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS - COST 517,797.22 517,797.22 0.00 478,061.00 39,736.22
ALLOUANCE FOR DEPRECIATION 134,927.43 128,627.94 (6,299.49 (59,159.57 (75,767.86
---------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
NET FIXED ASSETS 382,869.79 389,169.28 (6,299.49 418,901.43 (36,031.64
OTHER ASSETS
PREPAID INSURANCE 12,745.66 19,118.49 (6,372.83 7,335.80 5,409.86
PREPAID RENT 7,771.51 7,771.51 0.00 12,000.00 (4,228.49
OTHER PREPAID EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,086.00 (12,086.00
PATENTS LESS AMORTIZATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
DEFERRED ORGANIZATION EXPENS 68,234.27 70,276.40 (2,042.13 90,040.63 (21,806.36
OTHER DEFERRED EXPENSES 29,463.22 24,864.21 4,599.01 28,419.50 1,043.72
--- ---------- --- --------- --------- ------------ ---------------
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 118,214.66 122,030.6 (3,815.95 149,881.93 (31,667.27
--- ---------- --- ------ - ----- -- --------- - ------------ -
TOTAL ASSETS 2,863,413.27 2,794,07 8 69,34 46 2,428,626 7 434,787 0
:3
Page
Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
For Periods Ending OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
BALANCE SHEET
Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Balance Last Period This Period Last Year
---------- .--------- ---------- ---------------
541,261.66 49,563.25 402,160.49 194,010.42
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1,145.56 (3,114.10 131.18 3,299.08
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
33,593.71 275.85 41,193.10 (7,323.54
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
---------- --------- ---------- ---------------
588,006.93 46,124.40 444,085.37 190,045.96
56,630.98 (1,073.94 72,558.73 (17,001.69
79,580.22 1,477.73 95,519.14 (8,461.19
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
50,029.64 6,276.21 28,581.21 27,124.64
8,108.15 2,335.15 35,860.65 (25,416.75
11,468.65 13,244.41 1,146.08 23,566.98
---------- --------- ---------- ---------------
205,818.24 28,259.56 233,665.81 411. 99
180,000.00 0.00 77,703.00 102,297.00
8,421.72 0.00 0.00 8,421.72
88,529.69 479.54 83,422.28 5,586.95
---------- --------- ---------- ---------------
276,951.41 479.54 161,125.28 116,305.67
---------- --------- ---------- ---------------
070,776.58 74,863.50 838,876.46 306,763.62
This Period
Balance
----------
596,830.91
0.00
0.00
3,430.86
0.00
33,869.56
0.00
0.00
----------
634, 1 31 . 33
55,557.04
87,057.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
56,305.85
10,443.90
24,713.06
----------
234,077.80
180,000.00
8,421.72
89,009.23
----------
217,430.95
---------
45,640.08
-1 ,
11/18/94 3:4 35 masSle
Description
------------- ---------
CURRENT LIABILITIES
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
TRADE PAYABLES
PAYROLL U.H. FEDERAL
PAYROLL U.H. STATE & LOCAL
SALES TAX
OTHER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
DEFERRED INCOME - SERVICE
DEFERRED INCOME - PENSION
DEFERRED INCOME - OTHER
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCRUED EXPENSES
SALARIES & UAGES
COMMISSIONS
PENSIONS/PROFIT SHARING
FEDERAL INCOME TAX
STATE & CITY INCOME TAXES
TAXES - OTHER
INTEREST
OTHER ACCRUED EXPENSES
TOTAL ACCRUED EXPENSES
CURRENT PORTION LTD
BANKS
OBLIGATIONS-CAPITAL LEASES
OTHER-NOTES PAYABLE
TOTAL CURRENT LTD
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
4
Page
·f.
/18/94 3:43:49 massie Current Period Compared to Prior Periods
For Periods Ending OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co.
BALANCE SHEET
This Period Last Period Change From Last Year Change From
Description Balance Balance Last Period This Period Last Year
------------------------ ---------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
LONG TERM DEBT
NATIONS BANK - NOTE #1 FIXED 131,408.23 131,408.23 0.00 233,705.23 (102,297.00
NATIONS BANK - NOTE #2 LINE 240,000.00 255,000.00 15,000.00 200,000.00 40,000.00
VA. ECONOHIC DEV. AUT.-VRLF 500,941.35 508,581.15 <7,639.80 589,950.58 (89,009.23
VEDCORP INC. 400,000.00 400,000.00 0.00 400,000.00 0.00
OBLIGATIONS-CAPITAL LEASES 8,421.72 9,123.53 <701.81 0.00 8,421.72
---------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
TOTAL LONG TERM DEBT 280,771.30 304,112.91 23,341.61 1,423,655.81 (142,884.51
DEFERRED INCOME TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CAP ITAL
COMMON STOCK 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00
DEBENTURES PAYABLE 125,000.00 125,000.00 0.00 0.00 125,000.00
PAID IN SURPLUS 480,000.00 480,000.00 0.00 480,000.00 0.00
---------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
625,000.00 625,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 125,000.00
RETAINED EARNINGS-BEGIN PERIOD 107,837.47 107,837.47 0.00 0.00 (107,837.47
NET INCOHE (80,160.64 (97,980.21 17,819.57 (333,906.10 253,745.46
--- ---------- --- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
TOT AL CAP IT AL 437,001.89 419,182.32 17 ,819 .57 166,093.90 270,907.99
--- ---------- ----------- - ----- -- --------- - ------------ -
TOTAL LIABILITIES ¿ EQUITY 2,863,413.27 2,794,07 8 69.34 46 2,428,626 7 434,787 0
J ·1
1/18/94 3:59:53 maSS1e Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page
For periods OCTOBER 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co.
INCOME STATEMENT
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to
Description Current Period Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Year
------------------------. -- ---------- --- -- .---- ---------- .---- ------------ .------
GROSS SALES 570,184.70 (101.53 0.00 570,184.70 0.00 580,272.59 1.74
RETURNS & ALLOWANCES 3,785.69 (0.67 0.00 3,785.69 0.00 8,586.37 (55.91
COMMISSIONS 4,824.58 (0.86 0.00 4,824.58 0.00 18,599.74 (74.06
-- ---------- --------- .---- ---------- .---- ------------ .------
NET SALES 561,574.43 (100.00 0.00 561,574.43 0.00 553,086.48 (1.53
COST OF GOODS SOLD 463,000.54 (82.45 0.00 463,000.54 0.00 476,852.95 (2.90
--. .--------- --------- .---- --------- ---- ------------ .------
GROSS PROFIT 98,573.89 ( 17 . 55 0.00 98,573.89 0.00 76,233.53 (29.31
SALES, MARKETING, & ADVRTI SING 29,765.57 (5.30 0.00 29,765.57 0.00 33,618.64 ( 11. 46
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 46,580.30 (8.29 0.00 46,580.30 0.00 46,442.84 0.30
INCENTIVES & PROFIT SHARING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
--------- --------- ---- --------- ---- ..----------- ------
OPERATING EXPENSES 76,345.87 ( 13.59 0.00 76,345.87 0.00 80,061.48 (4.64
--------- ---- ---- --------- ---- ------------ ------
NET OPERATING INCOME 22,228.02 3.96 0.00 22,228.02 0.00 (3,827.95 680.68
INTEREST EXPENSE 3,253.22 2.36 0.00 3,253.22 0.00 11,238.65 17.93
OTHER INCOME OR EXPENSE 8,844.77 1.57 0.00 8,844.77 0.00 (3,806.89 132.34
INCOME TAXES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-------- - - ---- -------- ---- ..--- ----- ------
NET INCOME 7,819.57 3 7 0.00 7,819.57 0.00 ( 1 259.7 258.26
2
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods OCTOBER 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
22 massie
00
4
. ,
/18/94
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
1.74
55.91
74.06
580,272.59
8,586.37
8,599.74
Variance
Percent
0.00
0.00
0.00
Variance
to Budget
184.70
785.69
824.58
570
3
4
Period
Budget
0.00
0.00
0.00
Current
Pct
53
67
86
( 1 01
(0
(0
Period
570,184.70
3,785.69
4,824.58
Current
DescrIption
GROSS SALES
RETURNS & ALLO~ANCES
COMMISSIONS
53
00.00
(5.25
(6.00
40.81
33.34
48
376.70
883.28
644.09
627.89
389.75
086
(
,
,
,
,
553
149
211
16
27
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
574.43
0.00
012.19
949.48
413.53
520.24
,
,
,
,
56
42
98
23
36
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
)
)
)
)
00
0.00
25.29
35.43
(4.17
(6.50
(100
574.43
00
19
48
53
24
o
012
949
413
520
,
,
,
,
56
42
98
23
36
NET SALES
PURCHASED FOR RESALE-COST
MATERIALS
FACTORY BURDEN
PRODUCT BURDEN
INSTALLATION COSTS
05
68.3
405
00
o
895.44
400
00
o
39
7
895.44
400
COST OF GOODS SOLD
63
31.84
22.04
38.51
0.00
96.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8
7
245.82
461.33
245.79
0.00
268.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
8
9
47
51
2
19
( 1
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
99
65
93
43
00
91
00
00
00
60,678
34,929
3,003
26,657
o
2,485
o
o
o
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
28.6
6.22
0.53
4.75
0.00
0.44
0.00
0.00
0.00
60,678.99
65
93
43
00
91
00
00
00
34,929
3,003
26,657
o
2,485
o
o
o
GROSS MARGIN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
PURCHASED MATERIAL VARIANCE
VARIANCE TO STANDARD
DISCOUNT ALLOCATION
SCRAP SALES
INTERIM INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT
PHYSICAL INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT
CAPITALIZED INVY INDIRECT COST
3.36
3
29
64
233.53
684
7
76
00
00
o
o
o
98,573.89
05
62
00
00
o
o
06
7.55
( 1
o
98,573.89
05
62
TOTAL OTHER FACTORY EXPENSES
GROSS PROFIT
3
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods OCTOBER 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
38 massie
00
4
,
..I
/18/94
.J
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
)
)
)
)
2.57
71
39
24
34
96
47
00
00
12
57
01
67
08
40
85
45
02
18
14
00
00
61
00
13
21
o
3
(4
( 6
( 9
( 1
o
o
(5
26
394
11
4
22
56
81
18
401
o
o
68
o
( 9
34
o
145.25
100.33
070.70
304.33
362.01
994.71
0.00
0.00
492.63
111 .84
252.86
615.27
118.95
560.23
036.19
428. 05
415.98
083.33
041.30
0.00
0.00
732.89
0.00
579.95
372.71
514
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
42
20
12
5
5
2
59
9
2
8
7
7
2
29
1
o
1
2
Variance
Percent
0.00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
------
040.92
42,443.85
20,782.64
11,559.46
4,968.29
13,832.33
12,804.32
0.00
0.00
18,494. 16
2,672.92
40,769.64
8,504.13
7,409.35
2,524.26
22,402.73
669.68
268.75
1,916.67
5,218.42
0.00
0.00
857.80
0.00
3,253.09
903.13
6
Period
Budget
0.00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Current
Pct
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
87
(7.56
(3.70
(2.06
(0.88
(2.46
(2.28
0.00
0.00
(3.29
(0.48
(7.26
(1.51
(1.32
(0.45
(3.99
(0.12
(0.05
(2.12
(0.93
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.58
0.16
o
Current Period
040.92
443.85
782.64
559.46
968.29
832.33
804.32
0.00
0.00
494. 16
672.92
769.64
504.13
409.35
524.26
402.73
669.68
268.75
916.67
218.42
0.00
0.00
857.80
0.00
253.09
903.13
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
42
20
1 1
4
3
2
8
2
40
8
7
2
22
1
5
6
on
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTI LI TI ES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
I.IARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES AND ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
Descrlpt
3
3
04
4
03
074
202
00
o
36
449
230
00
o
04
4
449.36
230
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
43
04
588
26
00
o
28
490
29
00
o
9
5
28
490
29
ACTUAL BURDEN
91
84
2
3
342.22
245.82
o
5
2
00
00
o
o
63
34,929.65
560
256
00
00
o
o
45.69
6.22
63
34,929.65
560
256
APPLI ED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
4
Page
Prior Year
1994
Current Period Compared to Budget and
For periods OCTOBER 1994 thru OCTOBER
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
massie
56
00
4
r
/18/94
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
J______
Variance
Percent
Variance
to Budget
Period
Budget
Current
0.00
59.52
91.73
00.00
0.00
0.00
(16.37
0.00
(1.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
77.05
0.00
89.90
12.60
0.00
91.70
4.24
0.00
00.00
0.00
00.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
---
.46
00
30
07
13
00
00
83
00
96
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
86
30
00
59
83
00
72
00
00
94
00
00
o
392
593
6
o
o
966
o
369
o
o
o
o
000
000
o
590
o
114
844
o
001
118
o
332
o
85
202
o
o
3
6
4
1
2
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
9,648.59
5,411 .53
1,373.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,644.88
0.00
1,344.88
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,000.00
1,000.00
0.00
1,634.89
0.00
11 .60
3,202.72
0.00
83.11
123.87
0.00
0.00
67.93
0.00
202.94
0.00
5.56
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Pct
72
96
24
00
00
00
29
00
24
00
00
00
00
71
18
00
29
00
00
57
00
01
02
00
00
01
00
04
00
00
1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
5
Period
648.59
411.53
373.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
644.88
0.00
344.88
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000.00
000.00
0.00
634.89
0.00
11 .60
202.72
0.00
83.11
123.87
0.00
0.00
67.93
0.00
202.94
0.00
5.56
Current
9
5
1
4
1
3
Description
-----------
SALES, MARKETING & ADVERTISING
SALARIES - MANAGEMENT
SALARIES - SALESMEN
SALARIES - CLERICAL
OVERTIME PREMIUM
INCENTIVES & A~ARDS
VACATIONS & HOLIDAYS
PAYROLL TAXES
PENSIONS
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
SALES RECRUITMENT
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
OUTSIDE MANPOWER
MARKET RESEARCH
PROMOTIOU
MEETINGS & SEMINARS
ADVERTISING - DIRECTORY
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
RENT - BUILDING
POSTAGE
TELEPHONE
OTHER UTILITIES
OFF I CE SUPPLI ES
INSURANCE - GENERAL
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENT - EQUIPMENT
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
DEPRECIATION
TAXES R/E & PIP
MISCELLANEOUS
8.64
6
33
00
o
765.57
29
00
o
30
765.57
29
TOTAL EXPENSE
5
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods OCTOBER 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
03 maSSle
o
4
I·
/18/94
.---:-
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
0.00
48.62)
00.00)
21.23)
( 1. 82)
0.00
554.53
(28.57
393.87
0.00
487.73
0.00
0.00
3.85
(2.46
0.00
52.78
1.84
0.00
4.23
0.00
0.00
00.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
----
0.30
0.00
958.36
141.75
914.33
558. 15
0.00
75.00
000.00
57.43
202.94
736.54
0.00
0.00
229.19
951.45
0.00
445.92
184.45
0.00
984.33
0.00
0.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
25
7
I
4
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
016.94
338.21
0.00
501.91
529.82
0.00
490.90
000.00
283.63
202.94
328.86
0.00
146.36
216.55
928.00
500.00
682.18
261.40
0.00
026.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8
3
5
4
3
1
4
Current Period
Budget
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Pct
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
44
38
00
21
27
00
09
89
05
04
77
00
56
23
11
09
12
16
00
18
00
00
00
00
00
00
1
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
8
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Period
016.94
338.21
0.00
501.91
529.82
0.00
490.90
000.00
283.63
202.94
328.86
0.00
146.36
216.55
928.00
500.00
682.18
261.40
0.00
026.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Current
8
3
5
4
3
1
4
on
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER'S SALARIES
OFFICE SALARIES
OVERTIME PREMIUM
PAYROLL TAXES
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE EXPENSES
LEGAL & AUDIT
OFFICE EXPENSES
DEPRECIATION
INSURANCE - GENERAL
TAXES, FRANCHISES & LICENSES
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
TELEPHONE
OFF I CE SUPPLIES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF AUTOS
POSTAGE
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
BUILDING OCCUPANCY
DONATIONS
DIRECTORS FEES
BAD DEÐT EXPENSE
CHARGE TO ACME SEELY
Descrlpt
442.84
46
00
o
30
580
46
00
o
29
30
580
46
TOTAL EXPENSES
6
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods OCTOBER 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
massie
09
o
4
/18/94
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
Variance
Percent
Variance
to Budget
Period
Budget
Current
0.00
0.00
24.84
0.00
4.62
00
00
13
00
52
o
o
3,633
o
7,605
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,535.53
0.00
8,717.69
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
Pct
00
00
81
00
55
o
o
o
o
1
Period
0.00
0.00
4,535.53
0.00
8,717.69
Current
Description
----------
NTEREST EXPENSE
INTEREST EXPENSE PARENT
INTEREST EXPENSE - VISA
INTEREST EXPENSE BANKS
INTEREST EXPENSE CAPTL
OTHER INTEREST EXPENSE
LEASE
93
0.00
0.00
22.43
0.00
0.00
70.95
0.00
20.14
0.00
9,999.99
----------
32.34
7
65
00
00
98
00
00
00
00
12
00
03
238
o
o
4
o
o
400
o
608
o
o
4
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
3,253.22
0.00
0.00
( 18. 34
0.00
0.00
7,521.89
0.00
485.64
0.00
,790.18
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
2.36
00
00
00
00
00
34
00
09
00
32
o
o
o
o
o
1
o
o
o
o
3,253.22
0.00
0.00
8.34
0.00
0.00
521.89
0.00
485.64
0.00
790.18
7
INTEREST EXPENSE
OTHER INCOME & EXPENSE
INTEREST INCOME PARENT
INTEREST INCOME MONEY MARKET
INTEREST INCOME OTHER
CAPITAL GAINS
CAPITAL LOSSES
RENTAL INCOME
INVESTMENT EXPENSE
BANI< FEES
RESTRUCTURING EXPENSE
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
89
3,806
00
o
8,844.77
00
o
57
( 1
8,844.77
EXPENSE
&
INCOME
TOTAL OTHER
1
Page
Prior Year
1994
Current Period Compared to Budget and
For periods OCTOBER 1994 thru OCTOBER
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
mass1e
o
4
/18/94
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
00
o.
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
95
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
55
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
Period
Budget
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Current
Pct
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
Period
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Current
Descriptlon
-----------
PRINT COSTS
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTI LI TI ES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
WARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES' & ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
00
00
95
55
00
o
00
o
00
o
00
o
00
o
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
00
00
95
55
00
o
00
o
00
o
00
o
00
o
ACTUAL BURDEN
5.99
96
5
93,714.33
28
93,110
00
00
o
o
224,688.70
224,688.10
00
00
o
o
o
o
40
40
224,688.70
224,688.70
APPLIED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
8
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods OCTOBER 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
8 massie
o
4
/18/94
1
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
2.57
00
00
90
01
89
38
00
00
18
50
00
00
00
00
00
00
30
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
00
8
20
o
o
8
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
97
o
00
o
o
o
o
88
o
o
0.00
226.49
206.49
132.90
388.73
752.81
0.00
0.00
628.43
098.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
415.98
0.00
123.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
257.30
0.00
4
5
,
,
,
,
59
o
4
6
7
7
2
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
92
0.00
0.00
992.37
801.86
054.36
645.65
0.00
0.00
015.44
318.92
792.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
38.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
50.86
0.00
040
,
,
,
,
8
3
5
7
9
2
6
Period
Budget
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Current
Pct
)
)
)
)
87
00
00
60
68
90
36
00
00
61
41
14
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
03
00
o
o
o
1
o
o
1
o
o
1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
(
(
(
(
Period
040.92
0.00
0.00
992.37
801.86
054.36
645.65
0.00
0.00
015.44
318.92
792.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
38.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
50.86
0.00
Current
,
,
,
,
8
3
5
7
9
2
6
on
STEEL FABRICATION COSTS
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
IND I RECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLI ES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
WARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES, & ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
Descr1pt
8.30
67
230
4
00
o
7
37,809
00
o
73
6
37,809.7
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
88
68
744
00
00
o
63
98,850
00
o
60
7
98,850.63
ACTUAL BURDEN
99
35.35
5
93,714.33
65
969
92
00
00
o
o
688.70
07
25,838
224
( 1
00
00
o
o
o
22.4
40
688.70
07
25,838
224
( 1
APPLIED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
9
Page
Prior Year
1994
Current Period Compared to Budget and
For periods OCTOBER 1994 thru OCTOBER
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
25 masS1e
o
4
-'
/18/94
.,
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
Var1ance
Percent
Variance
to Budget
---------
Period
Budget
Current
Pct
Period
Current
00
73
64
71
47
52
57
00
00
11
67
82
67
09
40
85
00
00
18
00
00
00
03
00
o
2
o
6
o
o
o
o
o
20
2,553
513
11
4
22
o
o
18
o
o
o
61
o
36
34
00
517.30
256.50
504.29
073.23
243.26
755.40
0.00
0.00
865.15
13.34
944.42
615.27
055.62
560.23
036.19
0.00
0.00
083.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
957.57
0.00
960.95
372.77
o
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
29
19
1
1
7
3
3
7
7
2
29
o
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
00
502.51
132.88
493.62
068.23
353.09
696.28
0.00
0.00
478.72
354.00
211. 65
504.13
343.99
524.26
402.73
0.00
230.50
916.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
762.80
0.00
667.08
903.13
o
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
31
19
1
1
7
3
9
24
8
7
2
22
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
00
61 )
41 )
27)
19)
31 )
66)
00
00
69)
06)
31 )
51>
31 )
45)
99)
00
04)
12)
00
00
00
14 )
00
47)
16
o
5
3
o
o
1
o
o
o
1
o
4
1
1
o
3
o
o
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
00
502.51
132.88
493.62
068.23
353.09
696.28
0.00
0.00
478.72
354.00
211. 65
504.13
343.99
524.26
402.73
0.00
230.50
916.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
762.80
0.00
667.08
903. 13
o
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
31
19
1
1
7
3
9
24
8
7
2
22
DescriptIon
-----------
MANUFACTURING OVERHEAD COSTS
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUH
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
~ARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES· & ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
2
2
6
2
069.28
37
00
o
o
53,740
00
o
27.38
o
53,740
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
6
2
28
069
37
00
o
o
53,740
00
o
27.38
o
53,740
ACTUAL BURDEN
36
8
20
40
93,714.33
05
56,645
00
00
o
o
o
09
233,147
------
79,407
00
00
o
o
52
4
4
4
o
09
47
79,407
233
APPLIED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
o
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods OCTOBER 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
32 massie
o
4
.
/18/94
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
00
13
00
20
00
08
48
00
00
00
00
09
00
69
00
00
45
00
00
29
00
00
75
00
31
00
22
o
292
o
20
(
o
o
o
00
o
94
o
3
o
o
56
o
o
468
o
o
87
o
20
o
00
620.21
0.00
256.80
0.00
999.53
865.00
0.00
0.00
55.00
0.00
308.44
0.00
39.58
0.00
0.00
428.05
0.00
0.00
918.26
0.00
0.00
775.32
0.00
361.70
0.00
o
7
4
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
00
60
00
18
00
87
19
00
00
00
00
40
00
04
00
00
68
00
00
42
00
00
00
00
15
00
5,933
o
1,007
o
198
852
o
o
o
o
8,362
o
41
o
o
o
669
o
o
5,218
o
o
95
o
435
o
Period
Budget
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Current
Pct
00
1 .06
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.14
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.49
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.93
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.08
0.00
o
Current Period
00
60
00
18
00
87
19
00
00
00
00
40
00
04
00
00
68
00
00
42
00
00
00
00
15
00
o
933
o
007
o
198
852
o
o
o
o
362
o
41
o
o
669
o
o
218
o
o
95
o
435
o
5
8
5
on
PRODUCT SERVICE COSTS
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
IJARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES' & ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
Descript
8
40
6,621.89
00
o
23,413.53
00
o
1
4
23,413.53
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
8
40
6,627.89
00
o
23,413.53
00
o
1
4
23,413.53
ACTUAL BURDEN
95
99
1
5
342.22
93,114.33
o
2
00
00
o
o
02.23
688.10
248
224
00
00
o
o
8
o
44
40
02.23
688.70
248
224
APPLIED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods OCTOBER 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
massie
39
o
4
..
/18/94
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
Variance
Percent
Variance
to Budget
Period
Budget
Current
Pct
Period
Current
00
0.00
61.24
35.72
0.00
4.30
1.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
00
007.74
617.34
103.12
98.20
730.49
621.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
23.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
5
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
00
007.14
649.76
66.29
98.20
626.01
610.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
774.40
0.00
24.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
5
1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
00
89)
29)
01)
02)
11)
11 )
00
00
00
00
14
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
(
(
(
(
(
(
00
5,007.74
1,649.76
66.29
98.20
626.01
610.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
774.40
0.00
24.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
Description
-----------
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT COSTS
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTI LI TI ES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
IJARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES & ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
98
22
4
7,202
00
o
8,856.92
00
o
58
8,856.92
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
98
22
4
7,202
00
o
8,856.92
00
o
58
8,856.92
ACTUAL BURDEN
99
5.72
5
93,114.33
9
512
86
00
00
o
o
224,688.70
78
215,83
00
00
o
o
o
38.43
40
688.70
78
215,83
224
APPLIED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
/18/94 4:02:53 massie Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co.
INCOME STATEMENT
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to
Description Current Period Pct Budget to Budget Percent This Period Last Year
------------------------. --------------- -- -- .---- ------------ .---- ---------- .-----
GROSS SALES 4,936,896.74 ( 1 03.11 0.00 4,936,896.74 0.00 5,438,091.61 9.22
RETURNS & ALLOWANCES 52,016.32 ( 1 .09 0.00 52,016.32 0.00 69,447.90 25.10
COMMISSIONS 96,682.43 (2.02 0.00 96,682.43 0.00 233,995.16 58.68
--------------- --------- .---- ------------ ,---- ------------ .-----
NET SALES 4,788,197.99 (100.00 0.00 4,788,197.99 0.00 5,134,648.55 6.75
COST OF GOODS SOLD 4,080,215.27 (85.21 0.00 4.080,215.27 0.00 4,512,769.75 (9.59
--. ---------- ------ ---- ---------- ---- ----------- ._----
GROSS PROF IT 707,982.72 ( 1 4.79 0.00 707,982.72 0.00 621,878.80 13.85
SALES, MARKETING, & ADVRTISING 298,662.32 (6.24 0.00 298,662.32 0.00 336,542.50 11.26
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 434,984.87 (9.08 0.00 434,984.87 0.00 455,729.75 (4.55
INCENTIVES & PROFIT SHARING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
---------- ------ ---- ---------- ---- ..---------- -----
OPERATING EXPENSES 733,647.19 ( 15.32 0.00 733,647.19 0.00 792,272.25 (7.40
--------- ---- ---- --------- ---- ----------- -----
NET OPERATING INCOME 25,664.47 0.54 0.00 25,664.47 0.00 :170,393.45 84.94
INTEREST EXPENSE 12,931.66 2.36 0.00 12,931.66 0.00 101,669.14 11.08
OTHER INCOME OR EXPENSE 58,435.49 1.22 0.00 58,435.49 0.00 (36,669.80 59.36
INCOME TAXES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-- ----- .-- ---- -- ----- ---- ..---------- -----
NET NCOME 80 60.64 67 0.00 80 60.64 0.00 235.392.79 65.95
2
Page
Prior Year
1994
Current Period Compared to Budget and
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru OCTOBER
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
08:25 masSle
4
/18/94
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
22
10
68
9
25
58
61
90
16
5,438.091
69,447
233.995
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
936,896.74
52.016.32
96,682.43
4
Period
Budget
00
00
00
o
o
o
Current
Pct
11
09
02
03
( 1
(2
Period
936,896.74
52,016.32
96,682.43
Current
4
Description
-----------
GROSS SALES
RETURNS & ALLOWANCES
COMMISSIONS
75
00
98
18
89
11
6
00
(5
3
2
4
648.55
948.36
245.71
979.42
960.21
837.87
·
,
·
·
·
34
448
340
801
177
199
5
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
97.99
0.00
047.69
306.97
822.23
641.92
4,788
260,
859,
172.
171,
0.00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
00.00
0.00
26.32)
38.83)
(3.61)
(3.58)
( 1
97.99
0.00
047.69
306.97
822.23
641.92
,
,
,
,
4,788
260
859
172
171
NET SALES
PURCHASED FOR RESALE-COST
MATERIALS
FACTORY BURDEN
PRODUCT BURDEN
INSTALLATION COSTS
2.73
( 1
57
97
968
3
00
o
3,463,818.8
00
o
72.34
3,463.818.8
COST OF GOODS SOLD
6
21.23
16.97
264.51
0.00
52.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
3
98
5
50
82
00
65
00
00
00
676
469,460
19,262
66.056
o
0,981
o
o
o
65
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
8
63
06
96
00
19
00
00
00
324,379
815
531
785
o
736
o
o
o
369
22
240
6
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
66
7.72
0.47
5.03
0.00
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
27
8
63
06
96
00
19
00
00
00
324,379
369,815
22,531
240,785
o
6,736
o
o
o
GROSS MARGIN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
PURCHASED MATERIAL VARIANCE
VARIANCE TO STANDARD
DISCOUNT ALLOCATION
SCRAP SALES
INTERIM INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT
PHYSICAL INVENTORY ADJUSTMENT
CAPITALIZED INVY INDIRECT COST
3.35
3.85
8
878.80
543,798
62
00
00
o
o
616,396.46
982.72
707
00
00
o
o
2.87
4.79
( 1
46
982.72
396
616
707
TOTAL OTHER FACTORY EXPENSES
GROSS PROFIT
3
Page
Prior Year
1994
Current Period Compared to Budget and
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru OCTOBER
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
8 massie
o
4
/18/94
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
)
)
)
)
0.96
00
36
14
66
02
98
00
00
11
11
21
41
26
89
40
14
75
00
29
00
00
00
00
31
52
4
2
03
(0
( 1
1
o
(100
28
61
84
18
3
(
2
83
45
9
o
o
49
o
29
409
1
112.04
085.80
959.20
643.10
658.61
668.49
0.00
91.50
398.00
911 . 89
955.27
783.79
189.50
728.00
505.88
856.38
071.03
435.07
918.22
0.00
0.00
163.52
0.00
768.01
494.06
746
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
630
376
207
43
65
32
25
25
49
09
71
71
25
267
5
14
71
17
7
Variance
Percent
0.00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
------
603.62
391,223.15
202,192.02
89,563.72
65,208.14
131,303.77
128,156.20
0.00
0.00
160,717.11
19,081 .35
202,545.94
85,041.30
13,512.70
25,242.60
263,761.26
4,583.11
2,287.17
03,583.35
19,582.56
0.00
0.00
0,673.38
0.00
8,200.38
0,814.70
56
Period
Budget
0.00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Current
Pct
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
73
8.17
4.22
1.87
1.36
2.74
2.68
0.00
0.00
3.36
0.40
4.23
1.78
1.54
0.53
5.51
0.10
0.05
2.16
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.38
0.23
( 1
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Period
62
391,223.75
202,192.02
89,563.72
65,208.74
131,303.77
128,156.20
0.00
0.00
160,717.11
19,081.35
202,545.94
85,041.30
73,512.70
25,242.60
263,761.26
4,583.11
2,287.17
103,583.35
19,582.56
0.00
0.00
10,673.38
0.00
18,200.38
(10,814.70
603
Current
56
Description
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
I.JARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES AND ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
25
3
9
9
96
818,463
00
o
645.7
985
00
o
47
4
985,645.7
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
00
4
0.67
2
2,449
00
o
33
2,547,249
00
o
53.20
2,547,249.33
ACTUAL BURDEN
9.99
23
2
6
5
750
469,460
979
00
00
o
o
77,433.70
63
369,815
2
00
00
o
o
45.48
7.72
77,433.70
63
369,815
2
APPLIED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
4
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
S2 masSle
4
..
/18/94
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
Variance
Percent
Variance
to Budget
Period
Budget
Current
0.00
15.97
(91.10
287.50
0.00
0.00
(11.72
0.00
(1. 15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(0.47
0.00
0.00
86.04
0.00
(91. 68
(18.25
0.00
(40.75
3.39
0.00
289.55
233.33
(88.81
0.00
0.00
88.60
------
( 11 .26
0.00
730.67
005.08
98.08
0.00
0.00
421.03
0.00
604.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
190.17
000.00
0.00
013.04
0.00
738.37
945.18
0.00
627.15
188.30
0.00
753.62
203.79
402.25
029.40
0.00
591.69
34
61
8
3
40
10
7
2
38
4
1
2
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
000.64
276.83
331.38
380.06
0.00
0.00
262. 15
0.00
448.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000.00
000.00
0.00
047 .03
0.00
227.94
836.95
0.00
741.57
228.62
75.00
935.73
679.30
45.00
029.40
0.00
5.92
08
40
14
3
6
40
10
3
2
1
2
2
3
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Pct
)
)
)
)
26
84
30
01
00
00
34
00
28
00
00
00
00
84
21
00
27
00
00
66
00
06
03
00
06
01
00
04
00
02
(2
( 0
( 0
(0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
6
Period
000.64
276.83
331.38
380.06
0.00
0.00
262.15
0.00
448.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000.00
000.00
0.00
047.03
0.00
227.94
836.95
0.00
741.57
228.62
75.00
935.73
679.30
45.00
029.40
0.00
5.92
Current
08
40
14
3
6
40
10
3
2
1
2
2
3
Descríptl0n
-----------
SALES, MARKETING & ADVERTISING
SALARIES - MANAGEMENT
SALARIES - SALESMEN
SALARIES - CLERICAL
OVERTIME PREMIUM
INCENTIVES & AUARDS
VACATIONS & HOLIDAYS
PAYROLL TAXES
PENSIONS
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
SALES RECRUITMENT
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
OUTSIDE MANPOUER
MARKET RESEARCH
PROMOTION
MEETINGS & SEMINARS
ADVERTISING - DIRECTORY
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
RENT - BUILDING
POSTAGE
TELEPHONE
OTHER UTILITIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
INSURANCE - GENERAL
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENT - EQUIPMENT
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
DEPRECIATION
TAXES R/E & PIP
MISCELLANEOUS
542.50
336
00
o
662.32
298
00
o
24
662.32
298
TOTAL EXPENSE
5
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
8 maSS1e
2
4
..
.}
/18/94
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
0.00
43.15
35.50
(7.12
( 1. 1-4
0.00
92.51
14.76
44.91
0.00
185.15
(43.75
122.84
( 15.69
(52.11
47.17
94.04
10.53
0.00
<30.52
807.11
0.00
714.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
----
4.55
0.00
792.08
955.50
683.78
475.03
0.00
557.73
000.00
182.27
029.40
367.70
240.00
562.12
469.83
196.33
019.88
844.59
128.57
0.00
728.71
418.23
0.00
78.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
20
15
246
6
60
4
2
8
1
5
4
1
7
38
Var1ance
Percent
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Variance
to Budget
077 .06
290.70
616.28
210.98
298.20
0.00
490.90
146.50
303.97
029.40
860.50
135.00
481.06
042.93
799.19
500.95
221.36
145.41
0.00
149.36
793.82
0.00
635.00
0.00
756.30
0.00
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
83
40
9
5
51
2
2
23
3
3
6
1
15
42
8
3
Period
Budget
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Current
Pct
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
74
93
01
40
32
00
01
07
05
04
50
00
07
27
14
03
32
88
00
17
08
00
01
00
04
00
1
2
o
o
o
o
o
1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
9
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Per10d
077 . 06
290.70
616.28
210.98
298.20
0.00
490.90
146.50
303.97
029.40
860.50
135.00
481.06
042.93
799.19
500.95
221.36
145.41
0.00
149.36
793.82
0.00
635.00
0.00
756.30
0.00
Current
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
83
40
9
5
51
2
2
23
3
3
6
1
15
42
8
3
on
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER'S SALARIES
OFFICE SALARIES
OVERTIME PREMIUM
PAYROLL TAXES
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE EXPENSES
LEGAL & AUDIT
OFFICE EXPENSES
DEPRECIATION
INSURANCE - GENERAL
TAXES, FRANCHISES & LICENSES
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
TELEPHONE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OUTSIDE SERVICES
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF AUTOS
POSTAGE
SERVICE FEES & MAINTENANCE
BUILDING OCCUPANCY
DOUA TI ONS
DIRECTORS FEES
BAD DEBT EXPENSE
CHARCE TO ACME SEELY
Descript
75
455,729
00
o
434,984.87
00
o
os
434,984.87
TOTAL EXPENSES
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year Page 6
For periods· JANUARY 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co.
INCOME STATEMENT
Current Period Variance Variance Last Year Variance to
Pct Budget to Budge-t Percent This Period Last Year
-- .---- .--------- .---- --- ----------- .-----
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.87 0.00 41,450.07 0.00 31,276.63 32.53
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.49 0.00 71,481.59 0.00 70,392.51 1.55
---- ---- ,--------- ---- ---------------- -----
2.36 0.00 12,931.66 0.00 01,669.14 11.08
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.01 0.00 (300.65 0.00 (479.61 37.31
0.00 0.00 (124.38 0.00 (592.66 19.01
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 .29 0.00 61,643.78 0.00 39,600.00 55.67
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.11 0.00 5,493.80 0.00 7,295.71 24.70
0.16 0.00 7,529.97 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.20 0.00 (9,390.45 0.00 (3,293.24 85.14
--- ---- --------- ---- --------- -----
.22 0.00 58,435.49 0.00 36.669.80 59.36
...
. ..
1/18/94 4 2:48 massie
Description Curre-nt Period
----------- ----------- -- ----------
INTEREST EXPENSE
INTEREST EXPENSE PARENT 0.00
INTEREST EXPENSE - VISA 0.00
INTEREST EXPENSE BANKS 41,450.07
INTEREST EXPENSE CAPTL LEASE 0.00
OTHER INTEREST EXPENSE 71,481.59
.---------
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE 12,931.66
OTHER INCOME & EXPENSE
INTEREST INCOME PARENT 0.00
INTEREST INCOME MONEY MARKET (300.65
INTEREST INCOME OTHER (124.38
CAP ITAL GAINS 0.00
CAPITAL LOSSES 0.00
RENTAL INCOME 61,643.78
INVESTMENT EXPENSE 0.00
BANK FEES 5,493.80
RESTRUCTURING EXPENSE 7,529.97
MISCELLANEOUS (9,390.45
---------
TOTAL OTHER INCOME & EXPENSE 58,435.49
7
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
-INCOME STATEMENT
2:53 maSSle
4
.10
/18/94
.
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
30.83
0.00
00.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
24
00
87
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
399
o
448
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
921.57
858.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
Period
Budget
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Current
Pct
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
02
02
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Period
00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
921.57
858.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
Current
Description
PR ItH COSTS
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREIHUH
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
LJARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES, & ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
93
09
848
00
o
780.47
00
o
04
o
47
780
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
09.93
848
00
o
47
780
00
o
04
o
47
780
ACTUAL BURDEN
95
90
9
9
93
82
752,579
73
75
00
00
o
o
926,916.60
3
36
925
00
00
o
o
24
2
40
40
926,916.60
3
36
925
APPLIED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
8
Page
Prior Year
1994
Current Period Compared to Budget and
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru OCTOBER
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
3:25 maSS1e
4
1
/18/94
"
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
96
0.00
00.00
04.57
(2.49
(3.15
3.09
0.00
0.00
35.27
59.01
74.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
88.51
0.00
00.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
42.80
0.00
o
7
0.00
226.49
724.44
850.51
135.21
272.33
0.00
0.00
574.31
039.25
570.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
313.35
0.00
123.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
838.05
0.00
746
.
,
.
,
630
36
50
52
74
55
25
9
3
Variance
Percent
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Variance
to Budget
62
0.00
0.00
126.48
583.24
492.59
569.50
0.00
0.00
172.85
263.99
444.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
529.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
95.18
0.00
603
,
,
.
,
75
49
50
76
75
10
2
56
Period
Budget
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Current
Pct
)
)
)
)
73
00
00
57
04
05
60
00
00
57
21
05
00
00
00
00
00
03
00
00
00
00
00
00
05
00
( 1
o
o
( 1
( 1
( 1
( 1
o
o
1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Period
62
00
00
48
24
59
50
00
00
85
99
00
00
00
00
00
00
14
00
00
00
00
00
00
18
00
603
o
o
126
583
492
569
o
o
172
263
444
o
o
o
o
o
529
o
o
o
o
o
o
95
o
Current
,
,
.
,
75
49
50
76
75
10
2
56
on
STEEL FABRICATION COSTS
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
UARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES' & ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
Descript
3
2
2
75
6
667.78
32
00
o
343.376.97
00
o
7
7
343.376.97
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
98
4
952.414.49
00
o
59
904.980
00
o
90
8
59
904.980
ACTUAL BURDEN
95
27.72
9
93
44
752.579
65
800
00
00
o
o
926,916.60
936.0
02
( 1
00
00
o
o
24
34
40
2
926.916.60
o
936
02
APPLI ED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
9
Page
Prior Year
1994
Current Period Compared to Budget and
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru OCTOBER
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
massie
4:3
4
,.
/18/94
f
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
Variance
Percent
Variance
to Budget
Period
Budget
Current
Pct
Period
Current
00
5.12
(2.11
09.66
5.13
(0.06
1 .00
0.00
00.00
26.59
57.14
78.12
18.47
3.27
( 1 .89
( 1 .40
0.00
32.56
46.75
05.82
0.00
0.00
81.46
0.00
32.06
409.52
o
00
131.14
736.61
465.50
629.52
679.82
598.15
0.00
91.50
840.68
566.67
551.95
783.79
556.20
728.00
505.88
0.00
571 .83
583.31
324.30
0.00
0.00
115.04
0.00
534.72
494.06
o
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
253
189
4
13
65
36
66
18
48
71
70
25
267
70
4
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
00
097.15
731.54
362.45
329.26
640.56
962.80
0.00
0.00
615.56
958.46
033.24
041.30
863.16
242.60
761.26
64.34
758.03
583.35
667.48
0.00
0.00
762.80
0.00
592.67
814.70
o
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
266
185
9
14
65
36
84
7
35
85
72
25
263
03
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
00
56
88
20
30
37
77
00
00
77
17
82
78
52
53
51
00
02
16
01
00
00
02
00
26
23
o
5
3
o
o
1
o
o
o
1
o
2
1
1
o
5
o
o
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
00
097.15
731.54
362.45
329.26
640.56
962.80
0.00
0.00
615.56
958.46
033.24
041.30
863. 16
242.60
761 .26
64.34
758.03
583.35
667.48
0.00
0.00
762.80
0.00
592.67
814.70
o
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
266
185
9
14
65
36
84
7
35
85
72
25
263
03
Description
-----------
MANUFACTURING OVERHEAD COSTS
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
WARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES· & ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
8
3
2
o
2
o
55
o
67
488
230
00
o
253.3
360
00
o
28.4
253.3
360
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
55
o
67
488
230
00
o
253.3
360
00
o
28.4
253.3
360
ACTUAL BURDEN
26
2.79
789.95
28
30
80
57
00
00
o
o
47
6
004,6
644,358
2
00
00
o
o
87
3.46
4
47
6
004,6
644,358
2
APPLI ED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
o
Page
Prior Year
1994
Current Period Compared to Budget and
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru OCTOBER
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
massie
09
5
4
.
8/94
. .
/
.
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
Variance
Percent
Variance
to Budget
Period
Budget
Current
Pct
Period
Current
00
6.4
0.00
41.54
0.00
(3.84
(1.05
0.00
0.00
99.42
0.00
13.68
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
22.84
00.00
00.00
6.13
0.00
0.00
225.10
0.00
3.15
0.00
o
00
79,175.04
0.00
2,651.41
0.00
9,031.47
8,612.62
0.00
0.00
172.60
0.00
47,583.65
0.00
395.80
0.00
0.00
5,856.38
185.85
851.76
7,423. 18
0.00
0.00
3,048.48
0.00
2,971.97
0.00
o
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
00
74,099.26
0.00
3,752.74
0.00
8,684.97
8,521.90
0.00
0.00
1. 00
0.00
41,072.93
0.00
407.48
0.00
0.00
4,518.77
0.00
0.00
8,491.37
0.00
0.00
9,910.58
0.00
3,362.69
0.00
o
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
00
55
00
08
00
18
18
00
00
00
00
86
00
01
00
00
09
00
00
39
00
00
21
00
07
00
o
1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
00
26
00
74
00
97
90
00
00
00
00
93
00
48
00
00
77
00
00
37
00
00
58
00
69
00
o
74,099
o
3,752
o
8,684
8,521
o
o
1
o
41,072
o
407
o
o
4,518
o
o
8,491
o
o
9,910
o
3,362
o
Description
-----------
PRODUCT SERVICE COSTS
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
IJARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES, & ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
2.89
2
960
77
00
o
69
72,823
00
o
61
3
72,823.69
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
2.89
2
960
77
00
o
69
72,823
00
o
6
3
69
72.823
ACTUAL BURDEN
8.76
95
9
4
93
540
752.579
930
( 1
00
00
o
o
738.83
4
5
9
099
926
2
( 1
00
00
o
o
43.85
24
40
138.83
4
5
9
099
926
2
APPLI ED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
Page
Current Period Compared to Budget and Prior Year
For periods JANUARY 1994 thru OCTOBER 1994
Acme Design Technology Co
INCOME STATEMENT
mass1e
5:40
4
.
8/94
.
/
.
Last Year Variance to
This Period Last Year
Variance
Percent
Variance
to Budget
Period
Budget
Current
Pct
Period
Current
00
33
87
81
39
59
35
00
00
75
00
43
00
92
00
00
00
00
00
28
00
00
00
00
23
00
o
16
(3
021
11
1
o
o
99
00
91
o
1
o
o
o
o
o
788
o
o
o
o
88
o
00
865.86
122.70
117.85
163.67
812.11
185.39
0.00
0.00
411.17
311.97
800.00
0.00
237.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
47.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
423.27
0.00
o
43
17
1
5
6
2
6
3
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
00
027.34
460.48
322.05
296.24
485.65
102.00
0.00
0.00
6.13
0.00
274.40
0.00
242.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
423.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.84
0.00
o
51,
16,
I,
1 ,
6,
6,
7
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
)
)
)
)
)
)
00
07
34
03
03
14
13
00
00
00
00
15
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
o
( 1
(0
(0
(0
( 0
( 0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
00
027.34
460.48
322.05
296.24
485.65
102.00
0.00
0.00
6.13
0.00
274.40
0.00
242.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
423.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.84
0.00
o
,
,
,
,
,
,
51
16
1
1
6
6
7
Descript10n
-----------
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT COSTS
DIRECT LABOR
FACTORY EXPENSES
INDIRECT SALARY
INDIRECT LABOR
OVERTIME PREMIUM
OTHER COMPENSATION
PAYROLL TAXES
EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
PENSIONS
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS
FACTORY SUPPLIES
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
OUTSIDE SERVICES
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION
INSURANCE OTHER
TAXES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT
RENTAL OF BUILDING
TRAVEL & ENTERTAINMENT
BURDEN REDISTRIBUTED
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
WARRANTY COSTS
LOSSES; & ERRORS
MISCELLANEOUS
NET DELIVERY COSTS
65
3
'3
87,499
00
o
689.90
90
00
o
89
( 1
689.90
90
TOTAL FACTORY EXPENSES
65
3
9
87,499
00
o
689.90
90
00
o
89
689.90
90
ACTUAL BURDEN
95
28
9
o
752,579.93
74
080
665
( 1
00
00
o
o
6.60
70
226
926,9
836
00
00
o
o
24
38.35
40
926,916.60
70
836,226
APPLIED BURDEN
MANUFACTURING VARIANCE
· .
J 7.w. ôi]!jÎj'
,Q~
- "
41'
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
GENDA TITLE:
ob Training Programs in the Thomas Jefferson Planning
istrict
AGENDA DATE:
December 7, 1994
ITEM NUMBEt5 \
41-/- ./'2() r¡. . Jf.o )
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECTIPROPOSALIRE UEST:
ist of job training programs available for Albemarle
County residents
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION: X
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
STAFF CONTACT:
Tucker, White
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
As requested at your September 7 Board meeting, the attached material collected by TJPDC staff provides a list of job
training programs in the Thomas Jefferson Planning District that are available to Albemarle County residents.
RECOMMENDA TION:
Should you have any questions on any of the specific programs, please feel free to call either Ms. White or Ms.
O'Brien.
TRNGLIST.SAM
94.174
l
.,
.~
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Direct Providers of Training -- Public and Non-Profit
Albemarle County Schools..... ...... .........................
Charlottesville-Albemarle Technical Education Center........
Charlottesville Public Schools....... ....... ...... ..........
Drewary J. Brown Job Training Center (MACAA)................
Institute for Family-Centered Services......................
Piedmont Virginia Community College.........................
Personal and Carreer Development Center at UV A..............
Region 10 Community Builders Program........................
Small Business Development Center...........................
UV A Regional Center for Continuing Education................
\V orksource Enterprises......... ....................... ......
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
6
7
7
7
Direct Providers of Training -- Private
Career Transitions............ ........................ .....
International Beauty Schools...............................
National Business College..................................
9
9
10
Both Direct Traing and Referrals
Offender Aid 7 Restoration.................................
Virginia Dep1. of Rehabilitative Services..................
Virginia Dep1. for the Visually Handicapped................
10
10
11
Referrals Only
J 0 bSigh 1.............. ................................ .....
Piedmont Job Training Administration.......................
TeenS igh t..................................................
11
12
12
Addenda
Charlottesville Employment and \Vork Assessment Training....
Heil berg Associates........................................
FOCUS......................................................
14
14
14
'f
4
Job-Training Programs in the Thomas Jefferson Planning District
Direct Providers of Training n Public and Non-Profit
Albemarle County Schools
Program description: The high schools offer business, home economics, technology and
marketing education programs, as well as industrial cooperative training (lCT), in which
students take one hour of class per day and then go to on-the-job training.
Population served: 14-18 year-olds
Number of people in program: 526 in business, 85 in home economics, 268 in technology,
188 in marketing education, and 85 in ICT, for a total of 1152. A follow-up on 1993
graduate employment was performed, but has yet to be summarized.
Area served: Albemarle County
Funding source: School budget; also federal money for students who are testing in lower
quartile, economically disadvantaged or handicapped
Source of information: Carolyn Ross 296-5811 ext. 3341
Charlottesville-Albemarle Technical Education Center
Program description: Programs that count as part of the high school curriculum are available
to high school students, and include auto body, auto technology, carpentry, child care,
cosmetology, culinary arts, design technology, electricity, electronics, masonry, and practical
nursing. Classes and seminars are available for adults as well on a very wide range of
topics: a small sampling includes industrial safety and health, woodworking techniques,
communication skills for the office, camcorder use, masonry, building maintenance, and nail
care. CA TEC also offers apprenticeship programs to area businesses which combine on-the-
job training with related instruction in virtually any apprentice able field. Customized
business training is also designed for area employer needs; instruction may be offered on-
site or at the center and has recently included such topics as technical mathematics,
blueprint reading and schematics, concrete pouring and design, and communication skills.
(summary attached)
Population served: Ages 14 and up
Number of people in program: There are about 300 students in the high school program,
257 in adult education, and 168 in apprenticeship programs. The adult education number
Joh training report (ll/28/94)(file:dd\misc\wpjohtrs.doc) 1
..
. '
includes some, but not all, of the people involved in the customized business training
program; a figure for that program is not available. A report on the employment rate of
last year's high school students who completed the program is being prepared but is not yet
available.
Area served: The high school and adult education programs are not restricted as to area,
but only public high school students in Charlottesville and Albemarle may attend without
paying tuition. CA TEC is the designated provider for apprenticeships within PD 10 and
Buckingham County.
Funding source: School budgets for the Charlottesville/Albemarle public high school
students; tuition for other high school students ($500 for city/county students, $1000 for out-
of-area students) and for adult ed (varies by program). Apprenticeships are partially funded
by the state; students are also charged a $200 fee.
Source of information: Vicki Behr 973-4461
Charlottesville Public Schools
Program description: The high schools offer programs in business (including administrative,
business management, and information systems sequences), marketing, technology, and work
and family studies. The business program includes three sequences (administrative, business
management, and office systems) and some courses such as office services (offered for
disadvantaged students) and business law (for college-bound students) which are outside of
the sequences. Business Economic Applications is a Junior Achievement program offered
during the school day, and Cooperative Office Education offers part-time on-the-job training
for students in any of the business sequences. The marketing program prepares students for
work in the retail, wholesale, and service industries, and also offers a cooperative work
program. The technology program includes technical drawing/computer-aided design,
architectural and engineering drawing, and also includes the Design and Technology
Program, which covers information, materials, and energy resources, but is not
occupationally specific. Finally, the work and family studies program attempts to prepare
students for balancing work and family life by offering courses in such areas as career
exploration, food management, child development and parenting, creative fashions, and life
management skills (for special-needs students).
Charlottesville schools also offer some adult programs, mostly in business areas such as
microcomputer use and word processing. Other courses may be offered if there is enough
demand for them.
Population served: Ages 14 and up
Number of people in program: Six to seven hundred high school students take one or more
Joh training report (\ I /28/94)(file:dd\misc\wpjohtrs.doc) ~
~
.
of the occupational or technical courses each year. The largest program is business, and
there are about 400 students who take at least one business course; 40-60 students complete
an entire sequence in the business program each year. Of 40 of last year's "completers" in
the various programs (selected randomly), 38 were either employed or enrolled in post-
secondary education; 2 were unemployed and not seeking employment. The adult education
classes typically contain 10-20 students per class.
Area served: Charlottesville; adult education classes are open to those outside of the city
as well.
Funding sources: School budget for high school courses; adult courses are supported by fees
of $20-$25 per class.
Source of information: Dan Fielding 984-7037
Drewary J. Brown Job Training Center (Monticello Area Community Action Agency)
Program description: Two programs are available: Certified Nursing and Opportunity
Knocks.
Certified Nursing Assistance is an 8-week training program. After the current class graduates
in January, 1995, the program is expected to be discontinued due to a loss of JPTA funding.
Past programs included a Dental Assistant program, dropped due to no placements and a
clerical program, dropped due to outdated equipment and computer programs.
Opportunity Knocks is a 9-month program in which people participate for 9 months, 40
hours a week, getting paid for 25 hours of work and taking 15 hours of classes (either adult
ed or PVCC, depending on education level). In Opportunity Knocks, the education aspect
is expected to lead to a GED for adult ed participants, or to the point that PVCC students
have received federal or state financial aid to continue on their own. For those who desire
jobs, the program will continue to help them find one if they have not found one by the end
of the nine-month period.
Population served: Those meeting federal poverty income guidelines ages 18 & up (CNA),
18-25 (OK)
Number of people in programs: 10 in CNA, 25 in OK. Ninety percent of those who
complete the CNA program find jobs as nurse's aides. Those OK participants desiring jobs
are not terminated completely until they find one.
Area served: Planning District 10
Joh trainin ! report (11 /28/94)(file:dd\misc\ wpjohtrs.doc) J
"
.
Funding sources: JTPA (Job Training and Partnership Act, administered by the Dept. of
Labor), some state & some additional federal funding
Future programs: Two additional programs will begin in 1995. Youth Build is a program
in which participants, who must meet federal poverty income guidelines, build low-income
housing to give them training in building and home maintenance trades. Americorps is a
program in which college students can make money for college, and will have different (but
yet unknown) financial criteria. Both are federally-funded programs for which participants
must be 18 or older.
Source of information: staff 296-0161
Institute for Family-Centered Services
Program description: Offers transitional help in learning skills needed to successfully apply
for a job, such as résumé writing, application-filling, and preparing for an interview. Also
offers supportive help, which as well as teaching job-application skills involves regular
contact after the person is placed, and may involve additional assistance such as with
transportation.
Population served: Families are usually referred through the Department of Social Services,
Department of Rehabilitative Services (DRS), the Court Services Unit of the Juvenile and
Family Court, or the public school system. They are often initially referred to IFCS for
other reasons. Substance abusers must be drug- and alcohol-free for at least 3 months and
in an active treatment program before they will be helped, but otherwise the clientele is only
restricted by the necessity that they have outside funding. Of the non-DRS clientele, about
two-thirds are high-school students, and the other third is made up of displaced
homemakers, laid-off workers, unemployed, or former substance abusers.
Number of people in program: The single largest number of referrals come from DRS;
within the past year, 24 people have been or are currently being aided. Twelve of those
were in Charlottesville, five in Albemarle, two in Nelson, and five in Louisa. Nine found
jobs, and some were referred to other programs for further help. About 25-30 were referred
from other programs; the breakdown by location of these is not available, but the majority
were from Charlottesville or Albemarle, with some located in Louisa or Madison counties.
It is estimated that about two-thirds of these found jobs.
Area served: PDs 9 & 10 and the Shenandoah Valley
Funding source: Referrals have funding through the referring agency; will assist in trying to
find funding (usually through DRS) fÒr others.
Source: Karla Lesher 977-2878
.Job traininl! report (11 /28/94)(file:dd\misc\wpiobtrs.doc) 1.
I,
Piedmont Virginia Community College
Program description: A variety of occupational/technical programs are offered. Seven lead
to an Associate of Applied Science degree: Business and Management, Business and Office,
Computer Information Systems, Electrical/Electronics Technology, Mechanical Technology,
Nursing, and Protective Services. Three lead to a certificate in Automotive Technology,
Administration of Justice, or Business and Office. There are also seven career studies
certificate programs in Business and Management, Business and Office, Child Care,
Computer Information Systems, Computer-Aided Drafting Technology, Electronics
Technology, and Industrial Mechanics. Internship opportunities are available for all
students enrolled in a degree or certificate program. This year, the college also initiated a
Tech Prep program, in which area high schools offer courses to juniors and seniors in
cooperation with PVCc. The students may then continue at PVCC for a total of four years
of study in electronics, office systems, business management, culinary arts, mechanical
technology, or nursing.
In addition to the occupational/technical program, PVCC offers customized programs
for business, industry, and government agencies through its Division of Continuing
Education (list attached). Credit and non credit courses, seminars, and workshops can be
designed, and in the past have covered such diverse topics as personal computer use,
soldering and surface mount technology, foreign languages, management principles, and
marketing.
Population served: Usually 18 and up for the regular occupational/technical program, but
younger students may be accepted with assessment, counseling, and approvals from the
college and their high school. A high-school diploma or GED is not necessary, but
applicants who do not pass tests in math and English will be referred either to PVCC's own
developmental studies program or to their community adult education courses, depending
upon the severity of the problem.
Number of people in program: In Fall 1993, 713 students were enrolled in the
occupational/technical programs. About one-third of these were enrolled in the Business
and Management program, with the next most popular programs being Nursing and
Computer Information Systems. In 1992-93, 1872 people were enrolled in the customized
training program, with 74% of those receiving college credit. A survey of the 1992-93
graduates of the occupational/technical programs found that 63.8% of those who received
the A. A. S. degree were employed full-time in jobs related to their field of study, while
another 17.0% were employed part-time. An additional 12.8% were employed at least part-
time in another field, while only 6.4% reported unemployment. Of the certificate recipients,
75.0% were employed full-time and 6.3% were employed part-time in related fields, 18.8%
were employed in an unrelated field, and none were unemployed.
Area served: PD 10 and the northern part of Buckingham County
Job trainin2 report (l1/28/94)(file:dd\misc\wpjobtrs.doc) ~
I
,
Funding sources: Student tuition for the occupational/technical programs is most commonly
supplied by the students and/or by a variety of federal & state grant and loan programs.
Some local programs, such as TeenSight and JobSight, also provide tuition aid for students.
Customized training is generally paid for by the business or government client. Tuition and
fees supplied 30.3% of the 1992-93 PVCC budget, with state support accounting for 50.9%,
grants accounting for 16.1 %, and other sources making up the remaining 2.7%.
Sources of information: Donna Klepper 977-3900 ext. 351, and literature sources: "Follow-
Up Survey of PVCC Graduates of the Class of 1992-93," Paul G. Fowler (author), Office
of Institutional Research and Planning (at PVCC) Research Report #6-94 (August 1994),
"Occupational/Technical Programs at Piedmont Virginia Community College," Ronald B.
Head (author), OIRP Research Report #3-94 (March 1994), and "Piedmont Virginia
Community College Management Information Handbook," compiled by the OIRP (April
1994). .
Personal and Career Development Center at the University of Virginia
Program description: Offers counseling related to choosing a career.
Population served: Open to the general public.
Number of people in program: About 50-60 per year.
Area served: The service is available to anyone who is willing to travel to the office, which
is located on the university campus.
Funding source: Funded through the Counselor Education Program of the Curry School of
Education.
Region 10 Community Builders Program
Program description: Clients spend 6 hours a day in the company of a counselor
(client:counselor ratio is 2: 1). Part of the day is spent either earning money or in a
volunteer position, and the other part is spent learning community-living skills. Clients work
from 6-20 hours per week at such jobs as mailing assistance, ironing and dog walking.
Population served: Severely or profoundly retarded persons with behavioral or socialization
problems.
Number of people in program: Sixteen, nine of whom currently earn wages.
Area served: PD 10
Job training report (It/28/94)(file:dd\misc\wpjohtrs.doc) ~
Funding source: Medicaid waivers
Source of information: Kim Darrah 972-1735
Small Business Development Center
Program description: Counseling and training are offered on virtually all aspects of operating
a business. Also offered are specialized business training courses on such topics as
marketing and finance for businesses which can guarantee 10 or more participants.
Population served: Prospective and current small-business owners and their employees
Number of people in program: In 1993, 236 clients were counseled, and an additional 386
attended classes and seminars.
Area served: PD 10 and Madison, Louisa, Orange, Culpeper and Rappahannock counties
Funding source: Funds are provided by sponsors (PVCC, University of Virginia and the
Charlottesville / Albemarle Chamber of Commerce) and matched by both the Virginia
Department of Economic Development and the U. S. Small Business Administration.
Sources of information: Donna Klepper 977-3900 ext. 351 and "Small Business Development
Center -- Central Virginia 1993 Annual Report," Charles A. Kulp (author), Small Business
Development Center (December 1993).
University of Virginia Regional Center for Continuing Education
Program description: The center offers classes on such topics as negotiation and dealing with
change, as well as classes preparatory to enrolling in James Madison Unviersity's night-time
MBA program. In the spring, a career management workshop will be offered, hepling
participants assess what their current knowledge and skills are, what they would like to do,
and what skills and knowledge are ncessary to achieve their goals.
Source of information: Phil Gates 982-5316
Worksource Enterprises
Program description: Provides jobs through a number of in-house programs such as the
Sheltered Workshop, bakery, alfalfa sprouts packaging and housekeeping at the Federal
Executive Institute. Also provides community placement.
Job traininl! report (11/28/94)(f'ile:dd\misc\wpjobtrs.doc) 1
Population served: Those with mental or physical disabilities, mostly over the age of 16,
although younger students at risk of dropping out may also participate
Number of people in program: Nearly 300 per year. Sixty to 70 of those are employed in-
house. Placement rate in the community is about 70%.
Area served: PD 10
Funding sources: Government including DRS, JTP A, Dept. for the Visually Handicapped,
Community Services Board, and Medicaid. Departments are billed on a per-client basis.
A small number of cases are covered by worker's compensation, and additional funding is
obtained from retail sales of products and the FEI contract.
Source of information: staff 972-1730
.Job traininl! renort (l1/28/94Hfile:dd\misc\wnjobtrs.docJ ~
"
Direct Providers of Training u Private
Career Transitions
Program description: Works with individuals one-on-one and in small groups of three to
seven on how to organize a career search, choose and focus on a career, and how to find
a job. Also offered are seminars and workshops on those topics and related ones (such as
how to transfer skills from one career to another) for employees of client businesses and
government entities.
Number of people in program: Currently serving about 50, including both individuals and
clients' employees. A survey of last year's participants indicated that 91 % were satisfied or
very satisfied with the guidance received, and 83% had taken specific action toward career
goals.
Area served: Primarily Central Virginia, but has given seminars and workshops in other
areas for national organizations.
Fees: Individuals are charged $35/hour for group work, which normally consists of four two-
hour sessions. Fees for one-on-one work are on a sliding scale from $30-$70, according to
ability to pay.
Source of information: Rick Benner 979-2780
International Beauty Schools
Program description: Two programs are available: a year-long Cosmetology Operator course
and a nine-week Manicuring Nail Technician course.
Number of people in program: About 25 students are currently enrolled in the cosmetology
program; the nail technician program typically has between 5 and 10. The completion rate
for the cosmetology program is about 75%, with 83.3% of those receiving their licenses, and
all who pass the licensing examination obtaining employment. Statistics for the nail
technician program are not available.
Area served: Charlottesville and the surrounding area
Fees: The cosmetology program is $4595, plus books and equipment.. The nail technician
program is $845 including all materials. Federal and state grants and loans are available
for the cosmetology program, but for the nail technician program, only in-house loans are
available.
Source of information: George Schaub 296-0159
.Job traini" ! report (11/28/94)(file:dd\misc\wpjobtrs.doc) 2
4 -
National Business College
Program description: Degrees and diplomas are awraded in Business Administration and
Accountying; degrees are offered in Management, Computer Science, Computer
Applications Management, Profession Legal, Executive, and Medical Secretarial, Office
Administration, and Medical Assisting. Diplomas oare awarded in Data Processing,
Administrataive Secretarial; certificates are offered in Professional Data Entry.
Area served: Charlottesville area or any others interested in attending school III
Charlottesville.
Fees: $104 per credit hour; $1,664 for 16 quarter hours; and $1,248 fro 12 quarter hours
(full-time); financial aid is available.
Number of students: Currently 135 students are enrolled.
Both Direct Training and Referrals
Offender Aid & Restoration
Program description: Offers training in job-search and application skills and supplies some
funds for community college, apprenticeships, etc.
Population served: Offenders
Number of people in program: About 300. About 80% of those eligible to look for a job
(i.e. released from prison) are employed (28% of the total program participation).
Area served: PDs 9 & 10
Funding source: JTP A. Also helps participants obtain other funding, such as Pell Grants.
Source of information: Mike Thornton 296-2441
Virginia Department of Rehabilitative Services
Program description: DRS purchases training programs from other sources, such as the
National Business College, Worksource Enterprises and various computer trainers. They
also run the Woodrow Wilson Training Center in Fishersville, which offers a variety of
programs such as business, clerical, woodworking, computer-aided design, electrician, etc.
Population served: Those with mental or physical disabilities (other than visual)
Job traininl! report (1l/28/94)(file:dd\misc\wpjobh's.doc) 10
.. -
Number of people in program: Currently over 400. In the last fiscal year, 66 people were
placed in jobs.
Area served: PD 10
Funding sources: Matched funds from the federal and state governments
Source of information: Naomi Aitken 296-5621
Virginia Department for the Visually Handicapped
Program description: Provides rehabilitative training in customer service (including the use
of a computer), vending, and production shops. Purchases training for many other fields and
will pay for undergraduate, graduate, technical and business schools. Also provides adaptive
equipment.
Population served: Those with visual handicaps
Number of people in program: About 250 per year. Typically 75-85% are successfully
employed.
Area served: PDs 6 & 10
Funding source: Matching funds -- 80% federal (Vocational Rotational program), 20% state
Source of information: Mike Burton 1-800-622-2155
Referrals Only
JobSight
Program description: Clients are sent to PVCC (or sometimes CATEC or other programs)
for vocational training. Assistance is offered for child care, gas money, tuition and books.
Counseling, support groups, career exploration and development, and job search guidance
are available. JobSight also contracts with the social services departments in its area to
provide case management, advising, and tutoring.
Population served: Single parents, displaced homemakers, low income adults
Number of people in program: 163 in 1993; 138 of those attended PVCC, with the balance
sent to other programs.
Job trainin ! report (ll/28/94)(file:dd\misr\wpiobtrs.dor) 11
.
. .
Area served: PD 10
Funding sources: JTP A, Gender Equity Act, and 1 staff person funded by the Employment
Services Program
Sources of information: Barbara Kessler 977-3900 ext. 410 and Joan Velliquette Powers 977-
5627
Piedmont Job Training Administration
Program description: PJT A serves as an assessment and referral center for programs run
by other agencies and private companies (over 60 in all, many located outside of PD 10).
Displaced workers are offered assistance with job-hunting skills and with finding a job in
addition to referral to training programs. (list attached)
Population served: Two groups -- the economically-disadvantaged (as determined by federal
poverty income guidelines) and displaced workers.
Number of people in program: 1,058 (July 1, 1993 - June 30, 1994). About 80% of
economically-disadvantaged (45% of youth) find jobs, and about 90% of displaced workers
find jobs.
Area served: PDs 9 & 10
Funding sources: Funding is received indirectly from the JTP A through the state and the
City of Charlottesville. In turn, PJTA supplies funding for programs in PD 10 offered by
the Monticello Area Community Action Agency, Offender Aid & Restoration, JobSight,
TeenSight, the Department of Rehabilitative Services, and Worksource Enterprises.
Source of information: Willie Blanton 971-3051
TeenSight
Program description: Assesses individual needs and finds a training source such as PVCC,
CA TEC or an apprenticeship. May provide tuition, books, child care and transportation
money according to need.
Population served: Those 21 and under who meet federal poverty guidelines.
Number of people in program: About 65 per year
Area served: PDs 9 & 10
Joh training report (11/28/94)(file:dd\misc\wpiobtrs.doc) 12
· .
Funding source: JTP A
Source of information: staff 295-8336
Job traininl! report (11 /28/94)(file:dd\misc\ wpjobtrs.doc) 13
·
~.
Addenda
Community Education and Work Assessment Trainin2 (CEWAT):
Pr02ram Description. Provides program assessment, explores toals and career
options; places students in retail and service positions.
Tar2et population: At-risk high school students and special populations which are
economic, adacemic, disabled, or teenage mothers.
Heilber2 and Associates:
Program description: Two programs -- Career testing (advising, help with job search skills,
one-on-one 100/year. Workshops related to topics for JPTA and local companies 3-4 times
a month with 5-30 people each session.
Tar2et Population: General Public and JPTA referrals.
Fees: General public 1/2 hour free. Package testing 2 hour sessions is $100.00. Some
reduced fees available.
Women's Center. University of Vir2inia: Referrals only.
FOCUS:
Program description: Career aptitude testing, job seeking skills, resume writing,
networking, interviewing, exploring hidden job market, workshops for groups seeking
employment. Job Seekers Coffee, 40 people per month.
Target population: High school on up, men and women, about 40/month.
Funding: United Way.
Joh trainin!! report (11 /2S/94)(f'ile:dd\misc\ wpiohtrs.doc) 14
f
!.Y')tc!t1,¡le\i ill ,\varc J2·f)2:,Q+ \
Wr;1¡' aern I~ÍJ, qLj:J~r{:fjzÞÞ!)..[~Yc 71,.E
'. ~\\. \;:·:C. . ,,' .'. ¡ :~:'\
\ \)'( NOV 29i~!~·1 j
i ' . t
! : ':. :. ",~~.J
L.' " .
[,'.;';:'"
·i ~a~ :~~.. :.: ~ ...... .¿.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Human Resources Department
Albemarle County Office Building
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596
Memorandum
To: Carole A. Hastings, Acting Superintendent
Robert W. Tucker Jr., County Executive
Via: Juliet C. Jennings, Director of Human Resources ~
From: Bob Brandenburger, Deputy Director of Human Resour~
RE: Governor Wilder's Early Retirement Program
I have reviewed the recent letters that were forwarded to the Virginia Retirement
System Board from Wythe County and Page County in which they expressed concern over the
total cost and interest rates to participate in the 1991 VRS early retirement program. In
reviewing the correspondence we received from VRS between January and March 1991, I do
not share the concerns expressed in these letters.
First, VRS initially provided a list of eligible employees and an estimate of the costs
for 100% participation in the program. This cost was expressed as a percent of our covered
payroll. Subsequently, VRS provided the estimated costs if paid in a lump sum. Estimates
were provided for two scenarios, 100% participation and 50% participation. The 100%
participation costs for the school division were estimated to be a lump sum of $3,306,657. In
all their correspondence, VRS stated that the actual costs would be calculated after retirement
applications were processed. We had less than 100% participation. Based on the school
division's actual participation the final lump sum cost for the school division was $2,595,723.
This final cost is considered reasonable compared to the VRS estimates.
Second, VRS indicated in correspondence we received on March 19, 1991 that the
lump sum could be payable over a number of months based on an 8% interest rate. In talking
to Mr. Gary Smith, Assistant Director at VRS, they were advised by their actuaries to fund
the lump sum at 8% because that was the rate used by the actuaries as the return on VRS
investments. If they charged less than 8% they would be taking a loss on their investment
potential and would have to reflect this in a VRS rate increase to the school division. The
alternative we could have considered would have been to seek other funding for the cost of
the program through other financial institutions at a lower interest rate. This was not
considered at the time.
t
l
In closing, the early retirement program would have yielded it's greatest savings if we
did not replace those who retired. Although the total employment of the school division has
increased since this program, the staff who replaced these retirees were hired at a lower
salary. The funds generated from these savings were not placed in reserve for the future debt
service of this program but were used to balance the budget.
If you have any questions or if I can provided any additional information please let me
know.
cc: Melvin Breeden
Roxanne White
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
.." .' L1.j()~ ,c#
;; ""i '-/on' ";. - ~: , ,¡, ,
. ~"D,iHt\,j, Ie, dO, 8[(',', ,_. "1. .
!\¡1"m1. ìh'm No Cþ..t . /2b1t'Q·/8 )
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors ¡1J~
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive /
November 21, 1994
Erosion Control
As we are all aware, erosion control is a very important program provided by Albemarle County.
Due to its high visibility, it is a program that is frequently scrutinized for effectiveness, yet
somewhat difficult to evaluate objectively.
One such objective review is the evaluation conducted by the State Division of Soil and Water
Conservation every two to three years. I have attached for your information the results of their most
recent finding which gave our program a rating of 18 out of a possible 20 points. It makes several
minor suggestions for improvements to our program and notes that "an 18 of20 is an excellent score
for the County E & S Program" that "has no weaknesses in any of the four [evaluation) areas."
I commend the County E & S staff and am encouraged by these results as to the effectiveness of our
program.
RWT,Jr/dbm
94.169
Attachment
cc: Ms. Jo M. Higgins
Mr. Robert A. Shaw
Mr. Geter M. Thacker, Jr.
NOV 0 7 1994
COMMONWEALTfI of VIRGINIA I=~JGfNEERING
ßEPARTMENf OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION '\
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
Regional Office
98 Alexandria Pike, suite 33
Warrenton, Virginia 22186
(703) 347-6420 (703) 347-6423 (fax)
October 31, 1994
Q!C',i""'C~Vit:."D
., ,;~~,,",,&..i .. ¡¡;;;;
Mr. Robert A. Shaw
Erosion Control Officer
Albemarle County
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22901-4596
RE: Albemarle County Erosion and Sediment (E&S) Control Program
Review
Dear Robert:
Thank you for meeting with me in on September 27 to review 'the
Albemarle County erosion and sediment control (E&S) program. We
discussed· all aspects of the program and inspected several,
construction sites. The E&S program evaluation is an ongoing
process that examines the county ordinance, plan review procedures,
inspection frequency and procedures, and enforcement procedures.
ordinance, reauired chanqes
Section 7-3, c. Add the provisions of section 10.1-560, land-
disturbing activity, #7 of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment
Control Law (VESCL), "however, this exception shall not apply to
harvesting of forest crops unless the area on which harvesting
occurs is reforested artificially or naturally in accordance with
the provisions of Chapter 11 (sec. 10.1-1100 et seq.) of title 10
or is converted to bona fide agricultural or improved pasture use
as described in subsection B of section 10.1-1163."
Ordinance~ oDtional changes
Section 7-4, d. The county may want to consider moving the fee
schedule out of the ordinance and keep it separate. Language can
be added to the ordinance that fees will be set by the Board of
Supervisors. The board may set these fees but keep them as an
attachment to the ordinance. This would allow the board to revise
the fee schedule without amending the ordinance.
Robert Shaw
October 31, 1994
page 2
The $1,000.00 maximum fee has been removed from the state law. The
county may remove this if desired.
Plan Review
l
Plans are being reviewed according to the state minimum criteria
and permits are issued properly. You are the designated plan
reviewer. Plans are reviewed quickly and returned with written
comments indicating what is necessary for the plan to be approved,
usually within two weeks. Variances are issued-occasionally, but
are judged judiciously prior to being granted.
The county is requiring an agreement in lieu of a plan for all
single-family homes.
Performance bonds are required for all land-disturbing permits.
These bonds are closely tracked to insure they do not expire prior
to the project completion.
Preconstruct ion conferences are mandatory in most cases and are
mandatory on all large proj ects. This is an excellent practice
that insures that all parties involved in the land-disturbing
activity are aware of the E&S plan and how it is to be implemented.
The county charges a $100.00 fee for most construction projects.
A $40.00 fee is charged for residential and agricultural sites.
This fee seems low, but the county inspection fee offsets the low
up-front costs.
InSDection
The county has two erosion control inspectors. You review plans
and inspect a minority of sites. Kenny Thacker inspects· the
majority of sites at this time. He is also a full-time erosion
control inspector. You are a certified level I, II, E&S inspector
and level I, II, plan reviewer. Kenny Tacker is a level I E&S
inspector. Kenny is also being trained as a plan reviewer.
Inspections are performed at the beginning and end of each project,
within 48 hours after runoff producing storm events, and at least
once every two weeks during construction. However, some of the
smaller projects may not be checked within 48 hours after runoff
producing storm events or regularly every two weeks.
Records of all inspections are logged to confirm date of
inspection, time of inspection, and any problems noted. Inspection
reports are not written on a regular basis unless there are
problems noted and corrective measures are necessary.
Robert Shaw
October 31, 1994
page 3
A $30.00 inspection fee is charged to landowners when a site is not
in compliance with the approved plan. The landowner is charged for
each inspection until the violations are corrected.
~
There are currently approximately 300 projects under performance
bond by the county. Of those, approximately 100 are actively under
construction.
The construction sites inspected were in good shape.overall:
Redfields, phase 2B: This site had widespread use of
temporary seeding and one large sediment trap at the end of
the cul-de-sac. The majority of the subdivision drains into
a very large SWM lake.
The Ridge: This residential subdivision project was graded
several years ago but still has stabilization problems. No
homes have been built at this time. The site has been seèded
every year but has not been stabilized. The county is in the
process of cashing the bond and having the site revegetated.
Several sediment traps are on the site and functioning.
Dunlora: This residential subdivision had several functioning
sediment traps, a good riprap channel, and good temporary/
permanent seeding.
Cherry Hill Development: This site was in the final stAges of
stabilization. The county was in the process of having the
developer overseed and regrade some portions of the site that
were not as per plans.
Enforcement
The county uses a notice to comply and a stop work order when a
notice to comply is ignored. The county will immediately issue a
stop work order on any project that is undertaken without first
obtaining an approved E&S plan, except for any work necessary to
protect the unpermitted site with erosion controls. In addition,
the county will cash bonds, administer administrative fines, and/or
go to court when necessary. The county has pulled bonds on many
occasions to achieve E&S compliance.
The county requires a bond, letter of credit, or cash escrow on all
projects. All bonds are tracked on a database and are renewed when
necessary.
The county is very strict on employing large temporary sediment
basins, sediment traps, and diversion dikes on large and mid-sized
projects. Smaller projects often utilize silt fence only because
of site conditions.
Robert Shaw
October 31, 1994
page 4
There is good enforcement of temporary seeding on stockpiles,
immediate seeding of all temporary E&S control measures, and timely
seeding of final grades. Erosion netting is required on most steep
slopes. The enforcement of temporary and permanent seeding
specifications helps to reduce erosion and insures good vegetative
establishment on most sites.
'-
Summary
The Albemarle County program has remained consistent since the last
program review in 1992. Based on this meeting, the sites we
inspected, and contacts with the county over the last two years,
the numerical evaluation of the program is·shown below:
Ordinance
Plan Review
Inspection
Enforcement
4.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Overall
18.0
A guide which explains the ratings is enclosed. An 18 of 20 is an
excellent score for the county E&S program.
Albemarle County has a very good E&S program that has no weaknesses
in any of the four areas. I have outlined a few changes of the
county ordinance for consideration. Hopefully the county will be
able to continue the effectiveness of the program into the future.
The Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation will conduct comprehensive program reviews of
all local erosion and sediment control programs at least every two
to three years. Please provide my office with any changes
concerning the county E&S program to insure that an accurate
profile of the program is maintained.
Please feel free to contact me for assistance if you have questions
about this review or questions involving E&S within the county.
~e1Y'
Ron C. Linton
Environmental Specialist
enclosure
cc:Jo Higgins (Albemarle CountyV'
James P. Edmonds (DCRjDSWC)
Thomas Jefferson SWCD
.f:nforcement
o
No use of available enforcement options when there are
repeated E&S violations and/or projects frequently
start without approved E&S plans.
1
Use of inspection reports and verbal warning only to
deal with repeated violations
2
Use of notice to comply after repeated violations are
noted on inspection reports: however, no use of further
enforcement when necessary.
3
Use of notice to comply and when notice to comply is
ignored or not adequately satisfied, permit revocation.
~
Use of notice to comply and IIstop work order" when
notice to comply is ignored: however, local ·governm~rtt
does not go any further with enforcement when necessary
(i.e., pull bond and or court).
5
In addition to all above-noted enforcement procedures,
the local government will pull bond, administer
administrative fines and/or go to court when necessnry.
Plan Review/Permittinq
o
Plans are not reviewed as total responsibility is
thought to rest on designer's shoulders.
1
Plans are reviewed but not according to state minimum
criteria.
2
Plans are reviewed according to stateminimum-crit0ria
for temporary E&S measures but not for post-development
stormwater management considerations.
3
Plans are reviewed according to state minimum critrria,
but land-disturbing permit and/or building permits are
issued before plan is approved (or permit fees do not
adequately reflect locality's cost for plan review,
inspection and permitting).
~
Plans are reviewed according to state minimum crit0ria
and permits are issued properly.
5
Plë1l1s are reviewed by more stringent standards than the
stnte minimum standards and permitting process is
adequate.
c:guide.42
W_C.l\,l,. PRQJ?RN'L.~'J.'.JJ~ß GU!DE
O~d.i.nance
o
Unable to locat~ ordinance.
1.
Ordinance not updated since it was originally passed
(based on 1973 Law).
2
ordinance updated by 1982 to include General criterla
and reference to 1980 E~_S HqDg~9_ok:
3
ordinance revised after 1988 Law changes in effect but
contains errors and/or no available local options
included.
1\
Ordinance revised after 1988 Law changes, mostly
correct but not all local options included.
5
Ordinance revised after 1988 Law changes, virtually no
errors and includes all options available.
Inspections
o
E&S inspections not performed.
]
Inspections performed only when there are complaints.
?
Inspections performed at beginning (initial
installation of controls) and/or end of project (final
stabilization) .
3
Inspections performed at beginning and end of project
and at irregular unpl~nned intervals.
5
Inspections performed at beginning and end of project,
after runoff producing storm events and at a regular
frequency (but not at least once every two weeks) .
Inspections performed at beglnning and end of project,
within 48 hours after runoff producing storm event and
at least once every two weeks during construc~ion.
-1
~
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA .~" 5,',,:r¡1,iÙi !ú f)(¡",íC. 1,2.:Cl1.:9+, " ~
,)"" ·9~/¡ 1.' q~{iZ(f7lfi.:/
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION" , 't lU'4'·'-OI (
..
'DOCU:-'iE:n CC::1 ¡WLAT RICHMOND, OCTOBER 21, 1994
[=~ OCT 2 I Pi~ 3: 54
APPLICATION OF
YELLOW BRICK ROAD, LTD.
CASE NO. MCS940136
For a license to broker the
transportation of passengers
by motor vehicle
ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING
IT APPEARING to the state Corporation Commission
("Commission") that an application has been filed, pursuant to
§ 56-292 et sea. of the Code of Virginia, by Yellow Brick Road,
Ltd. ("Applicant") for a license to broker the transportation of
passengers by motor vehicle to all points in Virginia from all
points in Virginia;
IT FURTHER APPEARING to the Commission that this application
should be scheduled for hearing, a hearing examiner should be
assigned to this matter, and the Applicant directed to notify the
public of its application and the hearing scheduled thereon;
accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) That, pursuant to Rule 7:1 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, a hearing examiner is he~eby appointed to
conduct all further proceedings in this matter;
(2) That this application be, and the same is hereby,
docketed and set for hearing before a hearing examiner at
10:00 a.m. on December 14, 1994, in the Commission's Second Floor
Courtroom in the Tyler Building, 1300 East Main street, Richmond,
Virginia, for the purpose of receiving evidence relevant to this
Application;.
(3) That, on or before November 23, 1994, the Applicant
serve a true copy of this order on (a) the mayor or principal
officer of the city or county from which the Applicant desires to
provide service; and (b) every broker authorized to provide the
offering service from points of origin proposed to be served by
the Applicant, as shown in Appendix A attached hereto. Service
shall be made by receipted registered mail, or by first-class
mail, to the last known address of the person to be served. If
service is made by first-class mail, proof of service shall be
verified by affidavit submitted by the Applicant certifying
compliance with this paragraph;
(4) That any person who expects to submit evidence, cross-
examine witnesses, or otherwise participate in the proceeding as
a Protestant, pursuant to Rule 4:6 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, shall file, on or before December 5,
1994, an original and fifteen (15) copies of a protest with the
Clerk, State corporation Commission, c/o Document Control Center,
P.O. Box 2118, Richmond, Virginia 23216, and simultaneously send
a copy thereof to Calvin F. Major, Esquire, 1313 East Main
Street, Suite 339, Richmond, Virginia 23219. The protest shall
set forth (i) a precise statement of the interest of the
Protestant in the proceeding; (ii) a full and clear statement of
the facts which the Protestan~ is prepared to prove by competent
evidence; and (iii) a statement of the specific relief sought and
2
~
the legal basis therefor. Any corporate entity that wishes to
submit evidence, cross-examine witnesses, or otherwise
participate as a Protestant must be represented by legal counsel
in accordance with the requirements of Rule 4:8 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure;
(5) That any person who desires to make a statement either
supporting or opposing the Application, but not otherwise
participate in the hearing, need only be present at the hearing
and make known his or her desire to comment;
(6) That, on or before November 23, 1994, the Applicant
publish the following notice in a newspaper or newspapers having
general circulation in the area to be served:
PUBLIC NOTICE
Notice is hereby given of a public
hearing before a hearing examiner in the
state Corporation Commission's Second Floor
Courtroom in the Tyler Building, 1300 East
Main street, Richmond, Virginia, at
10:00 a.m. on December 14, 1994, to consider
the application of Yellow Brick Road, Ltd.
for a license to broker the transportation of
passengers by motor vehicle to all points in
Virginia from all points in Virginia.
Any person desiring to make a statement
at the hearing need only attend the hearing.
Any person desiring to participate in the
hearing as a Protestant must file, on or
before December 5, 1994, an original and
fifteen (15) copies of a protest with the
Clerk, State Corporation Commission, c/o
Document Control Center, P.O. Box 2118,
Richmond, Virginia 23216, and simultaneously
send a copy thereof to Calvin F. Major,
Esquire, 1313 East Main Street, Suite 339,
Richmond, Virginia 23219.
The protest sha~l set forth (i) a
precise statement of the interest of the
Protestant in the proceeding; (ii) a full and
3
clear statement of the facts which the
Protestant is prepared to prove by competent
evidence; and (iii) a statement of the
specific relief sought and the legal basis
therefor. Any corporate entity that wishes
to submit evidence, cross-examine witnesses,
or otherwise participate as a Protestant must
be represented by legal counsel in accordance
with the requirements of Rule 4:8 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure.
(7) That an attested copy of this Order be mailed by the
Clerk of the Commission to Calvin F. Major, Esquire, 1313 East
Main street, suite 339, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
.
A True Copy J J 1: :,'J'}.,. ~ .. /ì.
'.Teste; (/v v.~....,~"~ .;;r. tø,~
.. ~., Clerk of the Õ
StatQ Comorah)n r,.......,_._ .
_. ... ,.-.. .-.--
4
· ABG'" FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
J'(ì.B,ì\1H
"'\:'\.'t.:,j it t).ìlìrU 12·D2.q1J
i~'!··':' """; ".;QLt·12Q1l5· 2/))
November 17, 1994
..
"T"
BILCA'.1P, MARYLA!':D èi,11~
tllL)7) 741:
F:\\ 410·èl\·'i524
Mr. Bob Richardson
Sovran Bank, N.A.
Post Office Box 26904
Richmond, Virginia 23261
Re: Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts.)
Dear Mr. Richardson:
Enclosed please find the Bond Program Report and Monthly Report
Pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Deed Restrictions for the month
of October 1994.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me
at 410-575-7412.
Sincerely,
)(~ iI. vn1 [J¡ Vt\LÁ tl/J\.
Sheila H. Moyniha~l'v-~ .--
Project Monitor
/shm
enclosures
cc: Ms. Ella W. Carey, Clerk, CMC
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
4
Effective October 31, 1994
MONTHLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 7(a) OF THE DEED RESTRICTIONS
TO:
ABG Associates, Inc.
300 E. I..crnba..rd Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
RE: Hydraulic Road Apartments - Aroor Crest Apa.rtr.'ents
Charlottesville, Virginia
Pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Deed Restrictions (the "Deed
Restrictions·), as defined in an Indenture of Trust dated as of
April 1, 1983, between the Industrial Development Authority of
Albemarle County, Virginia (the "Authority"), and your bank, as
trustee, the undersigned authorized representative of
Richmond-Albemar Ie Limited Pa rtner ship, a Vi rg in ia Limi ted
Partnership (the ·Purchaser·), hereby certifies with respect to
the operation and management of Hydraulic Road Apartments,
Charlottesville, Virginia (the "Project"), that as of the date
shown below:
1) The number of units in the Project occupied by
lower income tenants is 17 .
2) The number of units in the Project unoccupied and
held available for Lower Income Tenants is -0-
3) The number of units rented and the number of units
held available for rental other than as described in
(1) and (2) is 49
4) The percentage that the number of units described in
(1) and (2) hereof constitute of the total number of
units in the Project is 26%
5) The information contained in this report is true,
accurate and correct as of the date hereof.
6) As of the date hereof, the Purchaser is not in
default under any covenant or agreement contained
in the Deed Restrictions or in an Agreement of Sale
dated as of April 1, 1983, between the Authority and
the Purchaser.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Report as of
November 4, 1994
RICHMOND-ALBEMARLE LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, a Virginia
limited partnership
By:
SONO PROGRAM 'U.PCRT
Monl" October YMt~
, Property: Arbor Crest Apartments (Hydraulic Road Apts. ) Pro;.ct .: 051-35371
lOCltion: Charlottesville, VA Numt>., of Units 66
S",bmlUtd Þy. Loretta Wyatt November 4, 1994 Effective 10/31/94
Mal'\.l~r CaT.
Total Occupied 66
LOwt" INCOME Bond Occupied
I. 17
The lollowlng unlll hive t>coen drslgl'\.lled as "10.-., Incomt" unlls
1 Arbor Crest Dr 21 Dorothy B. Hubicsak 41
61.
'1 4 Arbor Crest Dr 'l'l Beverly T. Lane 42
62.
6 Arbor Crest Dr 23 Wilma M. Atkinson 4)
3 6.3.
4 9 Arbor Crest Dr 24 Virginia Burton 44
~.
S 12 Arbor Crest Dr 25 G. Robert Stone 45
e$.
6 14 Arbor Crest Dr '16 Betty L. Reed 4ð
ee.
7 20 Arbor Crest Dr 21 Evelyn Mandeville 41 17.
a 30 Arbor Crest Dr 28 Mary Cox Allen 48 61
., 44 Arbor Crest Dr 29 Sam M. Atherton 49 H.
10 56 Arbor Crest Dr 30 Violet DuCharme ~ 70.
11 76 Arbor Crest Dr 31 Ann G. Saylor :a1
71.
'2 78 Arbor Crest Dr 31 Ernest M. Nease 52
72
13 84 Arbor Crest Dr 3J Juanita Boliek 53 73.
,. 90 Arbor Crest Dr 34 Betty B. Elliott 54 74.
IS 92 Arbor Crest Dr 35 Dorothy H. Reese ~5 15.
16 94 Arbor Crest Dr 36 Sarah E. Fischer ~ 7&
17 106 Arbor Crest Dr ::17 Katherine T. Nowlen ~1
71.
18 3a ~. la.
19 39 59 11.
20 40 60 10.
T I\C c".n~s Irom pr r"'lo"s rcparr '..lIttcred in Ih. abo.... hSlang It.
O.,.lIona Addt1lona
H 11.
2 12 2 12.
3 13 3 13.
.. 14 4. 14.
5 15 5 15.
6 16 6 11.
7 17 7 17.
I " I. 11..
, 11 , ".
10 20 10. 20.
~st)¡¡¡(:dlG ~)ÌI"" /Â. ·O~. q4-
4 ';I"~¡j" ::..¡n t~,¡ Q4:12C!}£5· ZJ)
ABSTRACT OF VOTES cast in the County/City of /i /..... BE-IliA f(. L IZ_ ,
Virginia, at the November 8, 1994 General Election, for:
MEMBER
UNITED STATES SENATE
Nø~s of Cøndid4tes
Totøl Votes
Received
an Figures}
CHARLES S. ROBB
/3, r}.. 71
(1 C¡.3 (p
I
,3.S3:;-
,
OLIVER L. "Ollie" NORTH
J. MARSHALL COLEMAN
L. DOUGLAS WILDER
BA-L I L C.s
(3£((£f2.. t4-rJ i:J I () I'rTt:.. Cr+o(CL
tJ· E. Blb;+O P
? 0 !J-£r¿. í~-OMJ 1')
R Ç) /J)£~ í .s - J3r¿ (Xv AJ
BiBEE
-- 0
(
I
/
/
~.J.
I
(continue on reverse side, ifneetkd)
We, the undersigned Electoral Boord, upon examination of the official records deposited with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court of the election held on November 8, 1994, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct
Abstract of Votes cast at said election for Member of the Senate in the Congress of the United States.
c¡ ft day of November, 1994.
Given under our hands this
BOARD
Chairman
A copy teste:
Chairman
ELECTORAL
Secretary
\ (SEAL) /
~
~ ~ ~ ~ Secretary, Electoral Board
:MEMBER, UNITED STATES SENATE
District
County/City of
A-Lß E/!Vl. !-t-¿(/G
Nømea of Ccmdidatn
(YL kE K. (rt2A5iLL
f-/ é;c,J A-~ í3. C r¿ !+òþ 0 C 1<
6E~:126IA l)/tt/tDóON
G DVF'-/ Do (~
/11 AI2K !ÆJ. ))o!2:SE y
?~) (L ßilf2, ~'-L /5
-D1+l/ID FRA-IJS¡J
2)/~ ~/ fO FRA N¿£;J
G, C\), G (r3so;J
VI Î<6tL GOODE
ê H ,p Hf1{<:"J) IN ()
P¡--f ( L J A-rvl £..5
:J¿FF£F2. ~AJ
~5YL\//A KLUTE
Ii L£A-i)¿~ ¡+oN¿::;!JT fYlA-¡J
,"77 IFI !VI, LL£K
Rpt LPH N't:+b¿tZ
;1/0 ¡J £:' ØF- f}ߢV~ ;" < .~...,
1;,..
November 8, 1994
General Election
Page cJ of Æ
Total Vatu
Received
(In Figure.)
I
I
I
{
/
I
(
I
l
3
(
(
l
'-/
I
S-
f
I
..
Abstract Continuation Sheet
(rIVM 6Efê J 0,(¡VJ 7£1) S7ft-7£S ~C
Office Title I
County/City of ffL- r5E1Yl A-¿ L E-
Names of Candidates
;VOiVL ~ (tiE HI.30¡!¿
RQ~( vBtE-/Ed
?£-rEK .5, GNu. ¡=
Po L) 0
W (LL.; /i-1v\ p ¡¿Ai 7'
tJ {LL I Am Or (J¡¿A-7T
N c () . (J~ftTí
R ONItL.J) RI3m8ç
Xl\!
))t:I3ß IE. RvfM/
L fì12¿ Y -S A-'6fr70
.:5T£ v£ :5HE..PIJí-j-12j)
J}-II/¡J ~ß~r¿ ~(T(-+
T£j) ~rE.pi-lENS
E.p S-rK4úS-5
fl,í creln ftiJ "stelA-I¿ rz f-kJL F
A!cuIÚì1ØU- ~ 1191
Election Date
Ó£N~L
Election
Primary, General or Special
Page -ª- of £
Total Votes
Received
(In Figures)
~:J
{
/
I
~
(
(
I
/
/
I
(
(
(
I
Abstract Continuation Sheet
/JIlÐi'1 (j£L 1 UN I Tet) jûttfè.J ~/h:E....
Office Titlé
County/City of ffL-ߣM ft12.. LL
Names of Candidates
(rlrt-¡¿y ~¿£. hJ y
,
Tt+£ CA-r IN 71fC r-i-A--r
120 y "7í-kHVI A-:5
$(+tU E< 0cA-t/¿¡:..5
H-D£i-E_ ¿j O£J...D
$'ot/.Em ¡J £/2 ~ / c¡ c¡ r.f
Election Date
(j'£¡rj £t? ffL- Election
Primnry, General or Special
PageïofL
Total Votes
Received
an Figures)
t¡
(
I
/
I
ABSTRACT OF VOTES cast in the County/City of 4L i3 6Æl.Alc-c L
Virginia, at the November 8, 1994 General Election, for:
MEMBER
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
_51-A
:_ District
Names of Candidates
·L J F 7:Jft Y¡V¿ I :JR,
(5 £0120 ¡¿ {'( L /¡ N DR I /1-1 lJI.
,j) fftlD fA) ( l]L/TtJ ;.¿E-?V<5 ;+1 P
U /1
!\ 013 Ei2 T GA7Y7 1-) /3£ LL
C H-R-I TINE. ê-1-f-4-Pl'rJ mJ
ALIA êO(0ND~
:D /5SC,tL~¿D
IYl f1-;e (( ¿J, "Dot< s¿ Y'
K /tf¿£-d Æ (Ct+ELL £ ~ v' f}-¡tj .s
IV A-T !-/-AtA) ¡¿ I tJ .:5
Total Votes
Received
(1n Figures)
We, the undersigned Electoral Boord, upon examination of the official records deposited with tM Clerk of tM
Circuit Court oftM election Mid on November 8, 1994, do Mreby certify that the above is a true and correct
Abstract of Votes cast at said election for Member of tM House of Representatives in the Congress of the United
States.
&1 JLfS'
/-1/ / J I
/
/
/
I
/
I
/
(
(continue on reverse side, if needed)
A copy teste:
Given under our hands this
¿.fi
t day of November, 1994. .
Vice Chairman
Chairman
/.
>9~(Q~.
Secretary
Secretary, Electoral Board
MEMBER, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- II.....
-~ I>istrict
County/City of A J- (~&;l'1 /h2.-LC_·
Name.ofCøndidate.
kLROY
0/}J11J£'s LA-R k III
L £Ai) D¿ fr¡JiJ !-ka¡ìJ8 ( 111 f-1--/J
IY1 ,C K¿ Y ¡() ()cL-s'¿
I
ILl é f'J 13- oE T/--j-E... f}Bo V E-
CftL R,PK,AJ
L H-¡V' £. STE-l¿ Ai
DA-¡/ II) ,J. .ST- ~(,4...A- JR...
({ N D ¡ c-- .D
tJ A-t2¡J., EN V A- N ]) EL L
RI C- t-f-A--¡¿j) W ~( ¿? tf T
l
..... .' ..
;' .~ ~)"' ,~
November 8,1994
General Election
Page~of~
Total Vote.
Receiwd
an Figure.)
(
(
(
J
i
(
I
I
(
I
I
. t_ }
ABSTRACT OF VOTES cast in the County/City of
Virginia, at the November 8, 1994 General Election, for:
A-L EElÝl A1GL.L
MEMBER
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
¡t(
7 District
Name. of Candidate.
Total Votn
ReceiÐed
(In Figure.)
'THoMAS --:r: "ToIVl(' ¡3LILEY Jk t
,
0¿fJJjL» E. ((JEre./Ç:y tI i3EI2f.¡
Ii /2EAL -tXE!r10CfèA- T
AAJ YOrf./E- EL s¿
Ill) £re C::_t-::.DC:S Hi2AN 4-
-:JÃ--IV E. ~*/J ({jlè. (H
G Eæ){eh E.. t(), 0-1t- ( LIE Y
;9-/1/ ¡J í3 htk £ L
GEiZA-LiJ dA-L J LL.5
/053(,
I
dl c¡ 9 7
I
/
I
(
(
{
~
B (3 t3 r.'3 [3
I
(continue on reverse .ide, if needed)
We, the umkrsigned Electoral Board, upon examination of the official records deposited with the Clerk of the
Circuit Court of the election held on November 8, 1994, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct
Abstract of Votes cast at said election for Member of the House of Represenrotives in the Congress of the United
States.
Given under our hands this
It
q t day of November, 1994.
Chairman
A copy teste:
Vice Chairman
f~· UJ.I).~ Secretary
/1
-
,Ç:f~ 1(" ~se<:refßiy, Electoral Board
:MEMBER, HOUSE OF REPRES~ATIVES
7- District
County/City of Þ t:-3£.1V1 (-}--1ê. GE-
November 8, 1994
General Election
Page ~ of --.l.2.
Nø_ of Candidate.
Total Vote.
Received
an FÎlfure.)
I A- '/ LOr¿ f3a+pL.))
731 LL THE- eft--r
-:;-;t+N /3 ( R þ,Sft LL
Bozzo
::Jõ Y C!E.". Beutt) ¡J
/111 K£ 151CO¿iJ AJ
,J;M¡y) Y ÎJ¿LFF£,
~-DA- í$uSOF..5K y
::JAm E-.S L ( C4-/11 ðL o5lli
-Ì)ON êi+uR-¡J15
SYi-VIA é LL-lT¿
f It1n E:S i3 ( C. ö f+<2£JN
W£O¡¿0£ {!oé.L:5
E ¡n J L,/ ClcrXl2 /c-
(!- TEl¿Te.-TOLB¿-¡¿T
f!-oi/£Y' bA-BN Y'
,
H-L .Frè£J) ¡)g-a é/¡-J-£:(è tV
,?JEff¿ oû2 AT, L
3
I
I
!
(
~
(
(
I
I
J
(
(
(0
I
(
(
{
0\'
-10" .,
Abstract Continuation Sheet
I11EiH Bß!J2.( jJcaSc-:of ?EPI2ESEtl.J rIJ''TitJi~ ( 7f~/)/~T!2{C r
Office Title
County/City of A-"?~13EIY1 (-t-rG¡,.ê..-
Na~H of Ca..ndida!es
I ffEØlXJlcE E ~ :DEL,( C ffclè
!k-.LEN DQI2N ¡ tV 9
JJ<c ({, () c fT5
f? !+of) If ,j)l2E/ YF--u-.S
£Þv[,'S -r FJ2A71J k¿( ¡¡j Jv<.. K £S
LAú£1'J ¿fH+U¿ 7
ErnlLY {ìO(COU 12 fC!.-
G I2llCE_ £. Y ODK
HL-L A-tJ F!2£&n rwJ
Ik L;¿4J m/6t11A-rJ
5-c~ ZAi¡j [; ~ C7!1L L ( l-Ju 9 1-1-
elT' i!--I-f51Gf !ll£- Gfþ'J LCY
,
G Etaflr £.. r;; ILL I f-h11
12 Ot3EJ2 ( q I /? Hí2~ò
.~SPEEf) Y {; ON Zfh:..Æ-: .5
,k{LIA 0I2EE-N
(l/(J/J£A;II3ER. g I ) q q +
Election Date
(ì £¡\j £¡¿frL Election
Primary, General or Special
.? .
Page .:::::. of (0
- -
Total Votes
&ceived
(In Figures)
I
/
(
('
/
I
I
I
!
/
I
(
I
I
(
(
Abstract Continu:::tion Sheet
ft!t¡¡:tu3¡(¡Z ( däJCf2r:..@iJr?¡¿,!,/'.ßli11rv'c.J I -:; é-¡ J)/J7¡¿ d ("
Office Title
County/City ()i' .lfU3£.1t7ft1Ctf....L
l"lanJc~¡ or COl1dida.tc..
(;;'/1'1 c) ,e£( ¡J
10(';?ER-- T Û), t-h7t2.LL£L
bAV I D /k T;n rtN
-IPOÞ ~ k /tJ-.5
¿; -;- E-f>!fEd /--k;L ¡j I rJ
:Jõ it N NE.. í3R.) ét¿E£.. l-fav I 6;
{! Hf'tf2L077£- /kur1 jJ I-H¿/..S
( !+oIN A 5 JEÞ~&æs[)rJ
íðt+r?RY -:]V fI/ E-6
1
CA--L Ú I ¡J :]Õ¡¡)£6
.s &£12E(( ::.:hvL5
K A-71 £ê.a¡¿t C--
M11 L '/ Ie! !+t,{,¡::/l1 ¡q-rJ
£¡1.1ILl/ KA-uICIG
_Ií+t+;J£ ¡<££;VEl(
:JI+c.K- KÉ'-I2.G{{ A-C-
--.
/lIO-t/ûf18£12 8; / ç ý'(l
J
Election Date
C¡~(Ij £l¿ft-L Election
Primary, Gencral or Spccia 1
Page 3- of ~
Total Votcs
Reccivcd
(In Figurcs)
I
I
I
I
(
I
d...,
d-
(
r
(
(
I
I
(
Abstract Contimwtion Sheet
111 ~fll&:t..f--¡)r[/{{5!:"(!)L tzef'l2E<5fl¡j (IlII ik:S/ 1- H..J) I~T¡¿{ cê
Ofhce 11Uc
County/City of ~1-rJ-¡¿LL
!"lunJ.~;.·; or Candidates
!Þ7/+12(; MEt G i !:1-pó/( 0
Lfl4/1/bR IT(-/-
fi-LBEKT LAFAVE..
L(tNi)!2-t Ttf
G E:¿:;i2 (ç.£ LIf'lll/J(¿( Tf-+
LIt/lJD ¿ T /-f
~._--
mAR,! þJAJ L/tvJLOK
{?ð ÖE/2- T LEt! {-uJ £i<,
~~~~EA- y tJ ¿
LFPA-'!NL
~----_._-
I-/ßGefrL 1)ß;11æiGl-t(
G· q OI2J)()/J L (,Ò£) Y
,
( ¡ /11 L ( IV Lb TI2£)/V!
_Lfl LtNM-n2ol11
121 CH-412iJ [u 7Z-
---------
JEJ2OME. mÆDDoct<
!VW6111ߣf<!. ~ ¡c¡c¡rf'
Election Date oJ
{7E./()i~ffL Election
Primary. Gcncrai or Spccia 1
Page S of (0
Total Votes
Received
On Figures)
!
I
f
d--
I
(
(
(
f
(
(
(
3
(
(
(
Abstract Continuation Sheet
!l1f411i3é/i J 6.{oUJ£ of- 2£¡/£-EJ£/l/fttTfI./~.5, ¡--rl.. J/Jïll (f.-(
OŒ.ce 1'itle . ...
County/City of /kßS/J1fttGL L
(lICWél'fl ðE4'2 0 I c¡c¡V
Election Date J
6&/t! ÆçP.....;.¡4 C E lectio n
Primary, General or Special
Pacre c;, of (0
b_ _
NanJ.~~!; or Cundid().tCH
Total Votcs
Received
(In Figurcs)
tv E41/ù '/ It? fN-/DE-
I
~OSé=-- IJI} 1+ ¡2 T (
------
~ r--fRf2L-£5 m /112. // ;J
/)/1-1// D If) ~ {loll! N ELL-
---------
1fJ_____lJ £- ;r; ~ C!o;1/ ¡1j ELL-
P!lY fjrJ /J1 c k!£lJ;¿ 1/::-
-~._---
~ T£A/GN /ìl E6k::S
---
/J~ 1"-'--' íVJ /"""" £>
/Vi< ¡j / N ---J ( / / I ~ 'IE. ''C....
~/n IY1 (Œt-hL
/J1/ c.¡.¿ Y IN Oi£0L
IIl/tl!(A-Æl m {)R-e¡MJ'
/f/oR. /( !,S-S&{(
fJ1/ C- k£'y ¡r¡ ((2(A0 L
R a/3 ERr {f, ¡J1 ¿¿L L D!2-
JZ;t+-tJ f£7'£IZSotJ (/1 'IEI(:5
f2 ALÞ/-l- NffDE!¿
(
(
g
/
(
(
(
I
.s-
(
(
(
~
(
I
/
Abstract Continu:1tÌon Sheet
M uW3E-Æ!..., I-!ca-'.?"..d(j}·c ß-:-Pllt0,z/¡} TItTW'Ej I 1'r-I1 ù/J /!2¡C í
Office Title
County/City ut·.. Æ{5 Df1A¡.'Jí2--cL
l'lanJ-C!; or C{;:¡¡dida!CH
¡U [;1 T Id£Äè.-
11/ (,-
I v Q11/ L--
~~---
~!tJIJ£ or:: r{<f- £. f}-ßtJ (/ L
il1 ~i- IV lJR-,?OI2-JJ
~1 {LL tyW /1 æ:;æf:oP-.-JJ
_1¿oßDt¿1 O/3¿¡8J
(ýN¿
{J·o ß () ~ eo ¡tI ¡¡/ £- L-L
-~_.
PAYNE-
L (¡:: (Jl+yrJc
[, 0 ' Pity tVC-
L (It/:JA- Pu/2 ¡¿LLO
,J EmJ L [r¿ é.- PI C fI£¡J
L ffz,J eF:4VC£ PI E--I2c-¿
-----
A-LtCE... P POOL
P({)PEfE
!l/ 0 (/1£411 ßuc 6'; /7 c¡ +
Election Date
C-E-N¡;¡¿fJ--L Election
pr...lnary General or Spcci<:d
PaCTe '::1 of (0
b.----L _
Total Votes
Received
(In FigureH)
(
:J-
d.-
/
I
I
I
I
-3
Lf
(
(
I
(
(
(
Abstract Contil1i.:J.tion Sheet
'; IÎ I::k () ::J fA .
IvtÛu&!2. I' ?¿d£CY:.uf5E-P/USE/JfItYlf"/E.J. I Ôí-Sæ,c.r
Office Title /
County/City of lJz.i:s&m kJ-1¿c£.
Nan-~·~; (){ Ca.11¿idcJ..fcs
~1¡Z(C(A L, PULLEtll
I? ON/hi) kfl-7Yl (JO
--_._~--
L {)-é~ ~û
K/2rj7EN !?£t11ßOW
;[0 ;2t~eE-S[:.A/r¡¡-TI otU
¡J Ai{ L R 6Y ¡¡/ i)¿.Ù..5
£0 lê?oße
---~
_.~!}¡{2¡2.y cS1tß7f (0
/ft;--(J K. (k /J¡¿ 7;-Ja i( Jc./--I ¿¿ T z.
liEN 12((< A ,)(! ffU T L
/71 A~ '( [6£ ~5£ TTL L-
~------
$ (-(1\1 -5t+E-eE.¡¿V
/1-1 f+.e:Yco/¿( £. ,$-r-fE/JH£/lJJ
:JQ¿+rJ J (--It £LD>5
fb2J It-11/ /J1, àftcä IJ I J.<
¿. 5
~Ot1L Y _ ¡n I TM
;l,0t/¡ÇA'N 13 E- ¡¿ S; (ff f
Election Date
() Ç'---II'/f?--!2-r-)C Election
Primary, Gcncral or SpCCiéi¡
Paae g of (0
b_ _
Total Votcs
&ccived
(In Figurcs)
I
I
(
(
I
(
d-
3
I
/
(
(
(
(
(
(
·
Abstract Continuation Sheet
¡1!1FfllOE"i(( !/c¿i-.JECt= MAt:.J¡¿-¡()rIt7iI.A:2.5/ 7~~J7(2(('. 7
OfÜceTitlc ___u__ ,
County/City of ~l-5£é'¡-1!h2.-L~
f·larn.c.'_ or CU.11did(·~fcs
-.f1tJ~/t=- T /;fl10~(Ntj
~ß7Lf-6 Y cf;; OeD r<
(
cSC /l'7 £ á:.7¡1!¿: £- LS £...
---_.~_._-
~'(-f¡J ~J, e:S'T£6DL-Y'
___....u I
¡k!()f112jJ ~MElèj,j
::)()µ./J <STaNEK..
Pc:r€r¿ <',5Tou).) I
~tJLL'y 7tlC1Î/ I1:S
/}1/~£ ( If -r '/-kWltz (lj91J
:Jé€_ T fha(è¡JJ)¡ K L
-:Jt2s,¡::-þ ¡+ ,7. THe f2-¡1,J.l:>/ /..< ¡¿
{!'f-Ilj¡¿L£::5 TõL {3ER--r
{-¡KIm 111 7õiV\
_j}oBE./.2("- L, (y~~
_.P9!3t!ÛT L. 7ýLEf¿. "( (I'
_·{;:)¡1/¿¡1tY Cl;0\J~
/llo-t/un OEi2 d; 11'9L/'
Election Date
{¡£f1/ E--/2·/Jc
Election
PrÜnary, General or ::>pecial
Page~of~
Total Votes
Received
(In Figures)
I
/
/
(
~
S-
I
/0
(
(
1
G
(
(
J
(
Abstract Continuation Sheet
M_ 0 7Mb
I f/f::;fl'Ì BE./? !¿(JF at-- IC~/'fè.£jc-:/J r /t 7(1Je.5 , I . I j-7I2 ( C í
Office itle'- I
County/City of
!f¿BCIJ1 A-t¿tr ~
Nan¡.,(~~; o{ Cundid..-¡J.cs
/J1! TcY- f-+ tI A· IV YI11-h2i:--5
~) I TŒ/-I- V IbJ Y /H-fI2E:.s c.Se. I
[)((-L /JJ¡rL (~
f?( êf< !Á-J /1L TE-K
::J[jµ.-,J J Wff£ELJ¿K.
ç7Ja¿~ C) L,(f:5 {J ( ¿.fY:;K
~-rE-Pt+btJ ¿J ( ¡\J (tI-12O P
FA Y/A-Off Rt Yusu /:::
---------
--_._.~---~_.._-_..
----
~~~._.-
!lIo~ Cð1 (jct:: ~) /e¡ c¡ L(
Election Date
Úg/VÇÆ/1L
Election
Primarj, General or Special
Page 10 of ~
Total Votcs
ReccÌvcd
(In FÌgurcs)
/
I
(
J..
I
(
~
(
PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
;4-L5£MAfZA_E.
County/City of
November 8, 1994
Special Election
Page 2 of2
QUESTION 3: Shall the Constitution of Virginia be amended to revise the
procedures followed (1) by the Governor to veto or propose amendments to
bills passed by the General Assembly and (2) by the General Assembly in
response to the Governor's vetoes or proposed amendments?
Total Vota
&crived
an F4fure.)
YES
13J /53
qjggO
NO
We, the undersigned Electoral Board, upon examination of the official records deposited with
the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the election held on November 8, 1994, do hereby certify that
the above is a true and correct Abstract of Votes cast at said election for and against the
proposed amendments to the Constitution of Virginia.
Given under our hands this
¡¡
f day of November, 1994.
Chairman
A copy teste:
Vice Chairman
/
>/ -C'I-u,~_
Secretary
Secretary, Electoral Board
ABSTRACT OF VOTES cast in the County/City of A L 13'£ ¡Vllh2- L-E
Virginia, at the November 8, 1994 Special Election, for:
PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMEND:MENTS
QUESTION 1: Shall the Constitution of Virginia be amended to authorize the
General Assembly to reopen and extend the statutory time period for bringing
civil lawsuits which involve intentional injuries to minors?
Total Votes
lùcft-.l
(111 Figure.)
YES IS¡ 893
NO g} 1039
QUESTION 2: Shall the Constitution of Virginia be amended to revise
voter registration provisions, including two changes that will (1) delete the
requirement that you must apply in person to register and allow
registration by mail and (2) eliminate the requirement for canceling your
registration if you have not voted in four years?
Total Votes
lùcft"N
(111 Fipre.)
YES I ~ 4~ I
NO 1°1 d 1-Þ
',:,...¡
,:>;..., " " ..,.....,,' '~.
CONTINUED ON REVERSE SlDE
·
ABSTRACT OF VOTES cast in the County/City of
Virginia, at the November 8, 1994 Special Election, for:
,A /...../3 G¡1I141Gf-E
PROPOSED CONSTITIJTIONAL Al\1ENDMENTS
QUESTION 1: Shall the Constitution of Virginia be amended to authorize the
General Assembly to reopen and extend the statutory time period for bringing
civil lawsuits which involve intentional injuries to minors?
Total Vot_
Iùm_d
(Ira Pigure.)
YES IS¡ 893
NO gJ 039
QUESTION 2: Shall the Constitution of Virginia be amended to revise
voter registration provisions, including two changes that will (1) delete the
requirement that you must apply in person to register and allow
registration by mail and (2) eliminate the requirement for canceling your
registration if you have not voted in four years?
Total Vot_
Iùm"ed
(Ira Pigure.)
YES /4¡ LfJ I
NO /0/ d 1-0
".
~., ~<
CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE
PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMEND:MENTS
~ßUvt~L-C-
County/City of
November 8, 1994
Special Election
Page 2 of2
QUESTION 3: Shall the Constitution of Virginia be amended to revise the
procedures followed (1) by the Governor to veto or propose amendments to
bills passed by the General Assembly and (2) by the General Assembly in
response to the Governor's vetoes or proposed amendments?
Total Vota
&cdwd
(1n PigurY:.)
YES
13J /53
qjggD
NO
We, the undersigned Electoral Board, upon examination of the official records deposited with
the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the election held on November 8, 1994, do hereby certify that
the above is a true and correct Abstract of Votes cast at said election for and against the
proposed amendments to the Constitution of Virginia.
aM
Given under our hands this L ·day of November, 1994.
A copy lute:
/
I
! ELECTORAL
\ . BOARD
" (SEAL)
'-
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Secretary
k7~Ú/~
Secretary, Electoral Board
. . '. .., .,. ';'\"'q' J2'01-,q~ 4)
'>"1;\·";'" ,.! '.~.'" . r-··'~ r7 / _q
.,'V··· " Lf' /1...ö,' lO
..,';..."" -t ~ __"'
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596
(804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 296·5800
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Mi11er
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO:
Board of Supervisors
FROM:
Ella W. Carey, Clerk,
CMCþ'{J) V
DATE: December 2, 1994
SUBJECT: Reading List for December 7, 1994
March·l::;1-ï 1993
Þ4r. Ma-:ct.in,.
. ··eewbeT-'3..-3-,-"--±'-~93---··~,;;···"BGWerma£
July 6, 1994 - Mrs. Humphris
August 3,······1-9-94···.=....·pag.e,ª--1.__-:.._1Q.. (Item. #·1-4) -Mr. Bowerman
page.s-·1-9--{..I-tem·#14} .~end.=Mr~ Marshall
August 17, 1994
pa.geo 10 (It pm .#.W-.:- end~Mr. Martin
-November-2-i·'--1~~ pageD 1
'pagcs 20
-l--9---Mr,T---E.e r kin s .
.. end- - Mr-s- .'.. ·Thomas--
-November--:!:-6-{N1-ï- 1-994: --Mr-:---Pe-r-k-ins---·
EWC:mms
*
Printed on recycled paper
-
<-*00
,
..
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596
(804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 296-5800
Charles S. Martin
R ¡vanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samue! Miller
December 13, 1994
Mrs. Angela Tucker
Resident Engineer
Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 2013
Charlottesville, VA 22902-0013
Dear Mrs. Tucker:
Following are the actions taken by the Albemarle County
Board of Supervisors at its meeting on December 7, 1994:
Item 5.3. Resolution for the addition and abandonment of
sections of Route 20 and Route 742 due to the reconstruction of
Route 20 at the intersection of Route 742.
ADOPTED the Resolutions (copies attached)
Item 5.4. Resolution to accept St. Ives Road (bulb) in
Camelot Subdivision into the State Secondary System of Highways.
Resolution will be forwarded from Engineering Department.
Item 5.7b. Resolution for the addition and abandonment of
sections of Route 250 and Route 1421 due to the reconstruction of
Route 250 on Pantops Mountain.
ADOPTED the Resolutions (copies attached) .
Agenda Item No. 7a.
Other Transportation Matters.
The Board congratulated you on your promotion to Resident
Engineer.
You asked if there were any outstanding concerns from your
letter, dated November 30, 1994, (item 5.8 on the consent agenda)
regarding last months Board meeting. There were some questions
regarding the use of flashers in lieu of signals; why flashers
*
Printed on recycled paper
Mrs. Angela Tucker
December 13, 1994
Page 2
were warranted in one location as opposed to nothing in another
location; VDoT's policy regarding gravel road maintenance; and.
various other items. Mr. Perkins said he appreciated the
response in writing addressing concerns and answering questions.
Mrs. Thomas said she talked with you about having a meeting
ln Ivy to discuss the intersection of Owensville Road (Route
678/Route 250). A neighborhood and user meeting will be held in
January to discuss what immediate steps can be taken.
Mrs. Humphris said she received a call from someone on the
Planning staff informing her that she may be contacted by a
citizen interested in purchasing the vacant piece of property at
the corner of Hydraulic Road and Georgetown Road. She became
concerned about access to that property because the off-ramp from
Hydraulic goes around the edge of this property and a new,
private entrance has been constructed. She asked when staff
should talk with VDoT about access to this property. You
indicated that VDoT can work directly with her (Mrs. Humphris) or
the citizen. Since this is a commercial development she does not
think an additional access should be constructed near the
intersection.
Mrs. Humphris said Mr. Roosevelt discussed with this Board
the ultimate improvements to Georgetown Road which included four-
laning to the intersection. That project would have a definite
impact on the property because of the apartment complex on the
southeast corner. You said it would be best to look at this
issue along with the ultimate improvements on Georgetown Road.
Mr. Martin said there is a problem with the timing of the
light at the intersection of Route 29 North and Rio Road. If a
vehicle is going south on Route 29 and then turning left onto Rio
Road, before the driver gets through the light, traffic on Route
29 heading north is proceeding. You indicated you would look at
the timing of the lights.
Mrs. Thomas asked you to follow-up with the residents of
Route 791.
Mrs. Thomas said the school system holds bus drivers
responsible for scratches to their buses. The bus drivers are
concerned about tree trimming. Mr. Willie Smith, Director of
Transportation, has tried to contact VDoT's maintenance manager
to discuss tree trimming on some County roads. You said you will
get in touch with Mr. Smith and work with him on this matter.
þ
Mrs. Angela Tucker
December 13, 1994
Page 3
Mr. Perkins asked that a median strip and stop bar be
painted on Tabor Street in Crozet. You said you would take care
of this.
Mr. Marshall asked when Route 20 South will be leveled where
the new construction recently occurred. Mr. Rick James, a
Construction Engineer, said the contractor milled the road
yesterday and it is supposed to be paved today.
Mrs. Thomas said she appreciates you taking care of the dip
on Route 250 West near the Christian Meeting House.
Mr. Bowerman said during the past couple of months, he has
received a number of complaints about traffic using Carrsbrook
Subdivision to bypass the construction on Route 29. The five
neighborhood associations in that area are concerned about plans
to extend Carrsbrook Drive to Berkmar Drive. The associations
feel that the only purpose of this extension would be to direct
traffic from the shopping area through their neighborhoods. He
asked the Board to direct staff to prepare a report on this issue
and do a traffic study to show the effect of this extension on
the communities of Northfields, Westmoreland, Carrsbrook,
Raintree, Fieldbrook and Woodbrook. Pending the outcome of the
report, he would also like to request that the Board entertain a
motion to amend the Comprehensive Plan to remove the extension of
Carrsbrook Drive from the Plan. This could also be done when the
Comprehensive Plan is reviewed and would remove $366,500 from the
Capital Improvements Plan for that project.
You provided a status report on the area where the Route
250/Route 29 Bypass enters Route 250 West at Bellair. You
reported that it was decided at the last meeting of the Bellair
Task Force that the off-ramp would be closed. Board members
expressed concerns about the role of the Task Force and that this
action was being taken with no input from this Board. Board
members also suggested that a letter be forwarded to Mr. Askew at
the Highway Department expressing its frustration and concern
that it was not involved in this process and ask why a decision
was made without consulting with the Board. Mrs. Humphris asked
for additional information about the history of this area and
what traffic decisions have been made. You said you would
provide this information at the January 4, 1995 meeting. Mr.
Tucker suggested that Mr. Askew be invited to this meeting.
Agenda Item No.8. Update: Design features and planting
plans/grants for Route 250 East.
Mrs. Angela Tucker
December 13, 1994
Page 4
Ms. Marcia Joseph, Design Planner, gave a brief
presentation. No action taken.
EWC/jng
cc: Robert W. Tucker, Jr.
Jo Higgins
Sincerely,
~~~~
Board of Supervisors
CMC
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
'}!S""1\ISUTEO r-) [.JOA~tt ....\I¿N,l;¡E.!,~5
(jt>¡ .L2..:..Œh.... q'i:..~>_..
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Road Name Change Policy Review
AGENDA DATE:
December 7, 1994
ITEM NUMBER:
Q4· 07~ ·!cR1
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REOUEST:
Discussion to reconsider current road name change policy
to place more emphasis on historic road names.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
,
STAFF CONT ACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Cilimberg, Weaver
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The Board's current policy regarding road name changes, initially adopted in September, 1991 in conjunction with the approval
of the new road names to support the Enhanced 911 System (reviewed in July, 1994) is as outlined in Attachment A.
A total of 34 road name change requests are currently being processed by staff, utilizing the Board's existing road name change
policy (see Attachment LB). Residents were provided with a listing of landowners adjacent to the road in question, a copy of the
road name change policy, and a sample petition format. Resident requests to change road names are in various stages of
completion. Once a road name change has been approved, staff will ascertain the total costs associated with sign replacement and
notify residents that upon receipt of payment, new signs will be installed and new addresses will be provided.
DISCUSSION:
It is staffs understanding that a Board member wishes to place more emphasis on historic road names when road name changes
are being processed by perhaps changing the policy to prevent residents from changing the name if it has historical basis or, at
least, requiring the Board's approval in those cases. If this is the case, a decision will need to be made as to how road names will
be classified as historic.
Staff has been working closely with residents requesting road name changes since the summer of 1992. Residents requesting a
road name change have been instructed that petitions could not be accepted until after the new address notification phase had
begun. Some residents have been waiting for two (2) years or more to formerly change the name of their road according to the road
name change procedure now in place and have followed the procedure as evidenced by the 34 requests now being processed.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the petitions currently being processed be exempt from any policy change in fairness to residents that have
already begun the road name change process utilizing the existing policy (this policy was provided to some of these residents as
long as two (2) or more years ago).
Should the Board wish to entertain a road name change policy amendment to place more emphasis on historic road names by
preventing a road name change to take place or, at least, requiring Board approval, staff requests direction from the Board on how
to determine which road names are to be considered historic. Consideration should be given to whether this process should be a
discretionary one or continue with definitive guidelines.
DECEXEC.WP
94.181
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
¡ATTACHMENT AI
AGENDA TITLE:
Road Name Change Policy Review
AGENDA DATE:
July 6, 1994
ITEM NUMBER:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECT/PROPOSAL/REOUEST:
Review of previously adopted road name
change policy
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION: X
ATTACHMENTS:
STAFF CONTACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Cilimberg, Weaver
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The Board's current policy regarding road name changes, initially adopted in September, 1991
in conjunction with the approval of the new road names to support the Enhanced 911 System,
is as follows:
(1) Requests to change Board approved road names must be submitted to the Albemarle County
Department of Planning and Community Development and must be accompanied by a petition signed
by a majority of the landowners along such road. Petitions will be reviewed by staff and,
if acceptable, will administratively approve the change. These changes cannot be implemented
until the County has assumed operational control of the Building Locator System (now
projected to be by November, 1994).
(2) A one (1) month window of opportunity wds established for road name changes to be
submitted after which no further changes would be permitted. The one (1) month window of
opportunity for road name changes will take place after the new address notification phase
of the project is complete (now projected to be in the September-October; 1994 timeframe).
(3) Property owner(s) incur the costs only for the fabrication and installation for new
signs. other staff costs would be absorbed within the County budget. If the Board continues
to allow changes after the deadline, the full costs for changes should be paid by the
property owner(s).
DISCUSSION:
New address notification is targeted to begin by September, 1994. Staff currently has 38
requests for road name changes on file from County residents. Staff will begin to coordinate
the petition process with County residents requesting road name changes in July.
RECOMMENDATION:
The intent of this executive summary of the road name change policy is to provide the Board
with the opportunity to review and re-acquaint itself with the current policy as this phase
of implementing the Enhanced 911 System can be a sensitive issue for County residents and may
generate citizen inquiries. This information is provided for the Board's information.
NAMECHNG.WP
94.087
I ATTACHMENT B II Page 1/
ROAD NAME CHANGE REQUESTS
CONTACT NAME AND EXISTING PROPOSED
ADDRESS NAME NAME STATUS
Betty Gardner Athea Drive Layton Drive Petition Received
P. O. Box 152
Ivy, V A 22945
Charlotte Dammann Barrsden Lane Barrsden Farm Petition Approved
Rt. 7, Box 248
Charlottesville, V A 22901
Mrs. Ernst Attinger Blair Park Road Virgmont Lane Two Petitions Received
Blair Park
Rt. 1, Box 277
Crozet, V A 22932
Ann W. Sweeney Briar Fork Trail Appleberry Lane Petition Pending
10406 Holbrook Dr
Potomac, MD 20854
Eric Heinson Catlin Road Petition Pending
2335 Owensville Road
Charlottesville, V A 22901
Jack Dillard Dudley Mtn Place Mountainside Place Petition Approved
Rt. 2, Box 18 Dudley Mtn Court Mountainside Court
Keswick, V A 22947
Brandy Lawson Garrison Lane Lawson Lane Petition Received
P. O. Box 221
Earlysville, V A 22936
Ed Smith Heiskell Lane Petition Received To Keep
Box 186 Name
Ivy, V A 22945
Carlton E. Vanderwarker Heiskell Lane Fielding Farm Lane Petition Pending
Box 620
Ivy, V A 22945
Jenny Gartan Hanau Place Barracks Place Petition Approved
118 Georgetown Rd, Apt 1 Hanau Court Barracks Court
Charlottesville, V A 22901
1 Page 21
CONTACT NAME AND EXISTING PROPOSED
ADDRESS NAME NAME STATUS
Helen Herrmann Hydraulic Road Woodlands Road Petition Received
Rt. 5, Box 241 (from 743 to 601)
Charlottesville, V A 22901
Joyce Brochu Lower Green Mtn Rd Petition Pending
Rt. 1, Box 9A
Esmont, V A 22937
Jack Yowell Milton Road Buck Island Road Petition Received
Rt. 9, Box 177B (from 53 South)
Charlottesville, V A 22902
Scott Peyton Newtown Road Greenwood Station Petition Received
P.O.Box5 (from New Hope Rd Road
Greenwood VA 22943 East)
Mary Jane King PVCC Drive College Drive Petition Approved
Rt. 6, Box 1
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Mrs. Gregg Reynard Road Reynard Woods Petition Pending
Rt. 16, Box 2 Road
Charlottesville, V A 22901
Joyce & Robert Gentry Rosenwald Hill Ashton Church Rd Petition Received
Rt. 24, Box 22
Charlottesville, V A 22901
Cathy Reece Roach Ridge Buffalo River Ridge Petition Received
Rt. 1, Box 120
Earlysville, V A 22936
Russell Seltzer Southwood Court W oodhaven Court Petition Approved
P. O. Box 6324
Charlottesville, V A 22906
page 3\
CONTACT NAME AND EXISTING PROPOSED
ADDRESS NAME NAME STATUS
Robert Nichols Taylor Mtn Drive Grenville Drive Petition Received
Rt. 3, Box 116
Charlottesville, V A 22903
Bradley Peyton Tiffany Lane Bluebird Lane Petition Received
Box 305
Greenwood, V A 22943
Barbara Brown Tilman Tract Loch Brae Lane Petition Received
Rt. 12, Box 42A
Charlottesville, V A 22902
Gertrude Timberlake Tin Can Alley Fire House Lane Petition Received
P. O. Box 246
Crozet, V A 22932
Shirley Robertson Wheeler Road Arrowhead Valley Petition Received
Rt. 1, Box 261 Road
Charlotteville, V A 22903
P. Marlowe Howard White Street Dunnegan Lane Petition Received
Rt. 3, Box 680
Crozet, V A 22932
Herbert McAllister White Hall Road Buck Road Petition Received
Rt. 2, Box 57
Crozet, V A 22932
In addition, there were nine additional requests for the petition packet. Two of the persons making a request
have since indicated that they do not intend to proceed while no further communications have been received
from the remaining seven.
----------------------
MS/jcw
A:\RDCHANGE.CHT
'\
?:éS Ç2'f.G'·C'l r?· 01· qlïl ~1t\.&
,:
.r
December 7, 1994
TO: Committee for naming roads in Albemarle County.
FROM: Landowners for the preservation of Roach Ridge as surname for Route 817
Dear Sir:
We submit to you a request to retain Roach Ridge as the surname of Route
817. this action is taken in response to current petition being circulated
for a name change. Following are three (3) major reasons supporting our
request with discussion on each:
I) Historical significance - selecting the name of Roach Ridge for Route 817
was very appropriate since the Roach family has played a significant role in
the area. Allow us to take you on a trip throught time. Based on genealogical
research, we have traced the Roach family back to Ireland where they were masters
in fishing and sea trades. Moving to America brought new challenges, new
opportunites, new successes. As early as 1726 the Scotch-Irish were moving from
Pennsylvania into the valley of Virginia, (among them Calus Roach). According
to census records and other documents many Roach males became farmers, trying
to be self-sufficient, supporting their wives and children and accruing
parcels of land in Rockingham, Greene and Albemarle counties. As Shenandoah
National Park became closer to reality; some of the Roach property - along
with that of approximately 3,800 other tracts became government owned. In
tribute to the Roach family, an overlook on Skyline Drive was named Smith Roach
Gap, for Smith Roach- a son( of Calus. Today visitors from allover the world
can stop here, breathe the fresh mountain air, and see the boundless beauty of
our world. For those who have extra time, there ia a trail which will lead
to a chimney - the only rema~rtsof a house where you still visualize a modest
man and his family surviving on hard work, love and togetherness. Having to
move from what is now a historic corridor through Virginia, the Roach family
still remained close to "home" settling in neaby foot hills, Raised in a strong
home, and led by God -Killis Roach, a son of Smith Roach, became educated at
Elon College in North Carolina. Upon returning home, (Route 817) he entered
the ministry in the Christian Church and also became a justice of the peace.
Practically everyone in our neighborhood has ancestors who have been touched in
some way by Rev. Roach as he performed sermons, marriages, funerals, and
made contributions to the legal system. Rev. Roach, in tradition had a large
family also. Four of his sons - Alex, Roy, Theodore, Jerney - at one time
owned the majority of the land joining and in the proximity of Rt 817. Their
families were cornerstones in the Pine Ridge Church of the Brethren, about a
quater of a mile down the road. As time moves so does the Roach tradition.
Recent descendants have become teachers, law enforcement officers, health
care professionals and successful self-employed business people. Just as the
legacy of leadership, character and public service still lives from those days
in Ireland, so too should the narreRoach Ridge live on!
i
..
\
(2)
II) EMERGENCY SERVICES: Roads in Albemarle county were named so
911 mapping could be enchanced and service by fire, rescue, police would
be of top quality. to change Roach Ridge at this point, could be disasterous
in emergency calls. We have talked with emergency techrtiëiansacross the state.
The response has been the same: road name changes create:
a) Confusion for the caller
b) confusion for the dispatcher
c) response time variation resulting in property
loss and for even death.
We are residents of Roach Ridge as a small group - but we are citizens
of Albemarle at large. One word similarity, one letter similarity or sound
similar.ity resulting from a name change could impact county wide emergency services-
LET"s KEEP ROACH RIDGE
III) MAIL SERVICES: We have spoken with mail carriers and postal
su~r~i~ors on this situation. Two fold confusion exists when road names
are changed. The landowner hangs in suspense; do I send change of address
cards?, do I print new checks:, will legal/business documents arrive properly?
The mail carrier, already working with high volumes, time schedules, and
under public scrutiny is put under unnecessary pressure in figuring out who lives
where and, which address is right. One carrier spoke of a situation that took
two years to straighten out.
We have a unique, historic name - let us keep it.
~TE~~__________________________________
A(HO\ ITIM ID. __1~~lLQb~_tp_95_______________________
ACJBÐ\ ITIMN.1M3 J\Åal.'· D?r.cJ1Qmt¿_frJ(_Lb~\LJ11_____
~9\~>LQXl1Lf~Ui~
DEFERRED UNTIL _~JJJCL_jJ~_~~__________________________
'.
Form.3
7/25/86
David P. Bowerman
Charlottesville
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596
(804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 296·5800
Charles S. Martin
Rivanna
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Jouett
Walter F. Perkins
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall, Jr.
Scottsville
Sally H. Thomas
Samuel Miller
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
FROM: Ella W. Carey, Clerk ØJ5L/
DATE: December 13, 1994
SUBJECT: Ordinances Adopted December 7, 1994
Attached is a copy of the following ordinances which were adopted by the Board on December 7, 1994:
1) An Ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 4, Animals and Fowl, Article 2, Dogs, Division 2, Running
at Large, by adding Section 4-19(33) to include Thurston Subdivision as one of those areas where dogs are
prohibited from running at large.
2) An Ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 3, Amusements, of the Code of Albemarle, by the addition
thereto of Article III entitled "Bingo and Raffles". The ordinance incorporates State Code requirements for
bingo games and raffles by reference into the County Code and establishes County requirements regarding,
but not limited to, permits, fees, management and operation of bingo games and raffles, permits for booster
clubs, interim tax exempt status for organization, minimum percentage of gross receipts mandated to be
spend for mandated purposes, audits and limitations on hours of operation of bingo games.
3) An Ordinance to amend and reordain Chapter 10.1, Law Enforcement, of the Code of Albemarle, by
amending Section 10.1-2, Disposition of unclaimed personal property in possession of law enforcement
agencies. This amendment will authorize the Police Department or the Sheriffs Department to convert
unclaimed property for department use. It also adds a section permitting any bicycle or moped which has
been in the possession of the Police Department or Sheriffs Department, and been unclaimed for thirty days
to be sold at public auction or donated to a charitable organization at the discretion ofthe Police Department
or Sheriff s Department. This amendment is necessary to bring the County Code in line with State Code
Section 15.1-133.01.
EWC/jng
C:\...\ORDINANC\ORDINANC.MEM
cc: Honorable James Camblos
Larry Davis, Esq.
Richard Huff, II
John Miller
Robert Tucker, Jr.
Municipal Code Corporation
*
Printed on recycled paper
ORDINANCE NO. 94-4(3)
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 4, ANIMALS AND FOWL,
ARTICLE 2, DOGS, DIVISION 2, RUNNING AT LARGE, OF THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of the
County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 4, Animals and Fowl,
Article 2, Dogs, Division 2, Running at Large, is hereby amended
and reordained by amending section 4-19, In certain areas, as
follows:
ARTICLE II. Dogs.
Division 2. Running at Large.
Sec. 4-19. In certain areas.
(33) Thurston Subdivision as platted and recorded in
the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of
the County, in Deed Book 637, page 456.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing is a true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously
adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, at a regular meeting held on December 7, 1994.
c~~ g~sors
David P. Bowerman
Charlot fesvlUe
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
Office of Board of Supervisors
401 Mcintire Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596
(804) 296·5843 FAX (804) 296·5800
Charles S. Martin
RIVClnrkl
Charlotte Y. Humphris
Jack Joueft
Walter F. Perkms
White Hall
Forrest R. Marshall. Jr.
ScollsviJle
Sally H. Thomas
S,Hnuel Miller
February 27, 1995
Mrs. Carolyn Sipe
1829 Thurston Drive
Crozet, VA 22932
Dear Mrs. Sipe:
Enclosed please find a copy of the signed petition
requesting that Thurston Subdivision be included under the
County's leash law. Also enclosed is a copy of the adopted
ordinance.
For your information, I go a copy of the tax map for
Thurston Subdivision from the Real Estate office. The signatures
on the petition were verified with the persons on the tax map and
it appears that a majority of the homeowners signed the petition.
The lots owned by Braeburn Ltd., and the vacant lots were not
counted.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
call me.
2:'~~relY, ¿J
E~arey, Clerk
EWC:mms
Attachments
cc: Walter Perkins
Calvin Tyree
*
Printed on recycled paper
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
/¿?-~-~
... .;! ~Ø/¿1";'(bd
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Robert W. Tucker, Jr., County Executive
October 28, 1994
Dog Leash Law - Thurston Subdivision
Attached is a petition for a dog leash ordinance in Thurston Subdivision near Crozet. Approximately
82% of the homes built within Thurston Subdivision are in favor of the dog leash law. Vacant lots
within the subdivision are owned by one owner.
Staff would recommend that you set a public hearing for amendment of County Code Section 4-
19(B) to i~~de Thurston Subdivision in a dog leash law area. The public hearing can be set for
December 11994.
RWT,Jr/dbm
94.156
Attachment
'''i ., ' ,." r~,,,.¡ ,.jhÇJ~tJi¡
~..~~. n~¡n hí; qL,kUO'b . .
DRAFT: November 8. 1994
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 4, ANIMALS AND FOWL,
ARTICLE 2, DOGS, DIVISION 2, RUNNING AT LARGE, OF THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA.
BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia, that
Chapter 4, Animals and Fowl, Article 2, Dogs, Division 2, Running at Large, is hereby
amended and reordained by amending section 4-19, In certain areas, as follows:
ARTICLE n. Does.
Division 2. Runnine at Laree.
Sec. 4-19. In certain areas.
~ Thurston Subdivision as Dlatted and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of th~
Circuit Court of the Countv. in Deed Book 637. Da2e 456.
4_19.002
.
.
.
III :8
t1 CD
CD'
III
-t1
, CD
( }
t1 ......
CD p.
( } cD
'D:J
CD rt
o ( }
r!-
H->O
¡:;H->
I--'
I--'
'<
o
:xJ..
0'
H
Z
:Þ
Z
(1
tx1
I\J I\J I'\) I\J I\J 1-' 1-' 1·-' I-' I--' 1-' I-J I-' I--' 'í (fJ .J ()\ \)1 J::" v) [\) 1-'
J::" W I\J I-' 0 \D 0) --.J \51 J::" L.J I'\) 1--' 0 . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
n
:-=
'\
~ '---
J::" .J::" J::" .J::" J::" J::" J::" J::" J::" Lv W lÞ) W LA! Lù v) Lù W W I\J I'\) I\J I\J f\J
OJ --.J 0"\ \51 J::" Lv rù I-' 0 \D OJ --.J 0"\ \)1 J:.:" W I'\) I-' 0 \.D OJ -J 0, \51
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,.......,
(J)
:J'
CD
CD
rt
Z
0
.
0
H,
---,. "t..,:.¿.~_'
p
:
~
.
..
.
..
,
--
./ /'
//'
.... /"
l \/
/\ .
\
'-- -~ \
.......... \
.,-,..'" ;'''..1..
", oø"'>-..
'- \" LOT,7
~ ~.~ Ac.
~~ .
.~~þ
.~~~..
. ..
~\~
~'þ
\~
\ \.\.
\ '\
\ \
......... ~
-- ,- ----........
;.
J
)
·1·
2'
..
.. .'
I:
..
..
..
T
/
/
I
"'-4,'C
;o'oK
LO T J9
.." Ale.
..-
.......
""..
.......
I
I
.'
,,,.
/"
If ,......
_'or
/
/<,,,0 ./
/' ,,~ '
// /
./ ,/"
.....t.
...,
.."I'"
II.
,t""
,t"
c.".
f~"'"
"UTU~£ jEVELOPMENT
S£C~·()IV TWO
9~.1)7S Ar..
.....1.
! :'~'t~ .,/. .
----~--....
l~·.~-"'::·
- _L
--
~ /1
Ti71/; I); ; /
rríl/./////~
-
~2@X~ ~.
.~ ~
::~
~ ..
..
~o .LOCATION MAP .
'-
CROZ!
.....'
~
¿F ,.,'..
'.. ". ,
_u"".
'II',
"/~;O~".'''''.--'
"O ·"·IJ~I
,J ".
~
..
-..,....,...
PL A T OF
'JIlt."
TON
SUBDIVISION
,'i" T, 0,",
THURS
NCAR CROlET
TE HALL MAGISTtRIAL DISTRICT
ALBtMARLC COUNTY. VIRGINIA
01:1 II~'" I, If"
~
/'
/'
.~.
'1#
,
~
..
'f."""
L._
_""f..
)........, .~
R
..;, z.
\
:
\
~
\
"'7
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Ella W. Carey, Clerk, Albemarle County Board of Supervisors
Rolisa C. Smith, Legal Services Assistanµ{g-
November 4, 1994
Draft Ordinance -- DOQ Leash Law for Thurston Subdivision
Attached please find the above-referenced draft ordinance prepared for the
public hearing to be held on December 7, 1994.
If I can be of further assistance, please let me know.
cc: Richard E. Huff, II, Deputy County Executive (wlattachment)
EWC114.wPD
-
-
ORDINANCE NO. 94-3(1)
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 3, AMUSEMENTS, OF THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of the County of
Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 3, Amusements, is hereby amended and
reordained by adding Article III, Bingo and Raffles as follows:
Add:
Section 3-20
Section 3-21
Section 3-22
Section 3-23
Section 3-24
Section 3-25
Section 3-26
Local Ordinance Adopted
Permit Required
Application Fee
Management and Operation
Special Provision for Booster Clubs
Interim Tax-Exempt Status
Required Percentage of Gross Receipts for
Qualified Purposes
Audit of Reports, Fees
Limitations on Bingo Operations
Section 3-27
Section 3-28
ARTICLE III. BINGO AND RAFFLES
Sec. 3-20. Local Ordinance Adopted.
Pursuant to § 18.2-340.8 of the Code of Virginia, the county shall
regulate bingo games and raffles. Article 1.1 of Chapter 8 of Title 18.2 of
the Code of Virginia, and all future amendments thereof, (§ 18.2-340.1 et
seq.) are hereby incorporated by reference.
Sec. 3-21. Permit Required.
Prior to the commencement of any bingo game or raffle by a qualified
organization, the organization shall obtain an annual permit from the county.
The finance director is designated to administer this article. The finance
director, at his discretion, may issue a permit upon compliance by an
applicant for a permit with the provisions of this article. All permits shall
be subject to reasonable regulations by the finance director to ensure the
public safety and welfare in the operation of bingo games and raffles.
No permit to conduct bingo games or raffles shall be denied, suspended,
or revoked except upon notice stating the proposed basis for such action and
the time and place for a hearing thereon. After a hearing on the issue, the
finance director may refuse to issue or may suspend or revoke any such permit
if he determines that the organization has not complied with the provisions of
this article. Any organization aggrieved by the decision of the finance
director may appeal such decision to the circuit court.
State law reference: §§ 18.2-340.3, 18.2-340.10, and 18.2-340.12 of the
Code of Virginia.
Sec. 3-22. Application Fee.
The application fee for the annual permit for a bingo game or raffle is
waived by the county.
State law reference: § 18.2-340.2 of the Code of Virginia.
ORDINANCE NO. 94-3(1)
(Page 2)
Sec. 3-23. Management and Operation.
No person may manage, operate or conduct bingo games or raffles for more
than two organizations.
S~a~e law reference: S 18.2-340.2:1 of the Code of Virginia.
Sec. 3-24. Special provision for Booster Clubs.
Booster clubs which have been operating less than five (5) years, and
which have been established solely to raise funds for school-sponsored
activities in public schools which are less than five (5) years old, may be
issued a bingo or raffle permit.
S~a~e law reference: S 18.2-340.3 of the Code of Virginia.
Sec. 3-25. Interim Tax-Exempt Status.
While an organization seeks tax-exempt status pursuant to S 501(c) of
the United States Internal Revenue Code, it may file the same documentation
submitted to the Internal Revenue Service with the finance director and
request an interim certificate of the tax-exempt status. If such
documentation is filed, the finance director may, after reviewing such
documentation as he deems necessary, issue a determination of tax-exempt
status. Such determination shall be made within sixty (60) days of receipt of
such documentation. The finance director may charge a reasonable fee, not to
exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00). This interim certification of tax-
exempt status shall be valid until the Internal Revenue Service issues its
determination of tax-exempt status, or for eighteen (18) months, whichever is
earlier.
S~a~e law reference: S 18.2-340.3 of the Code of Virginia.
Sec. 3-26. Required Percentage of Gross Receipts for Qualified
Participants.
A condition of every bingo game or raffle permit issued shall be that a
minimum of five percent (5%) of the gross receipts from all bingo games or
raffles shall be used for (i) those lawful religious, charitable, community or
educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or
organized or (ii) those expenses relating to the acquisition, construction,
maintenance, or repair of any interest in the real property involving the
operation of the organization and used for lawful religious, charitable,
community or educational purposes.
S~a~e law reference: S 18.2-340.3 of the Code of Virginia.
Sec. 3-27. Audit of Reports, Fees.
All financial reports filed pursuant to § 18.2-340.6 of the Code of
Virginia shall be audited by the finance director; provided, however any
financial report filed by an organization with gross receipts of less than two
thousand dollars ($2,000.00) for the designated reporting period shall be
exempt from this audit requirement.
The finance director may require the audit to be conducted by an
independent auditor or accountant. If so required, there shall be an audit
ORDINANCE NO. 94-3(1)
(Page 3)
fee equal to the actual cost of the audit. Such fee shall be payable to the
finance director and shall accompany the annual report. No audit fee shall be
charged for those audits conducted by the finance director.
state law reference: S 18.2-340.7 of the Code of Virginia.
Sec. 3-28. Limitations on Bingo Operations.
Bingo games shall be conducted only on the days of the week designated
in the permit. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between
6:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. No building or other premises shall be used by more
than one organization on anyone calendar day to conduct bingo games.
state law reference: S l8.2-340.9(D) of the Code of Virginia.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing writing is a
true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously adopted by the Board of County
Supervisors of Albemarle County, Virginia, at a regular meeting held on
December 7, 1994.
clf!krd ~~rviSOrs
"
;'~;J( 12 02 q'J J
, ~,.'i ~ . . '-j-"
",..~ :Ie,,:\; qlj ·11CJ2.· 700
DRAFT: October 12, 1994
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 3, AMUSEMENTS OF THE
CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA.
BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 3, Amusements, is hereby
amended and reordained by adding Article III, Bingo and Raffles
as follows:
Add:
Section 3-20
Section 3-21
Section 3-22
Section 3-23
Section 3-24
Section 3-25
Section 3-26
Section 3-27
Section 3-28
Local Ordinance Adopted
Permit Required
Application Fee
Management and Operation
Special Provision for Booster Clubs
Interim Tax-Exempt Status
Required Percentage of Gross Receipts
for Qualified Purposes
Audit of Reports, Fees
Limitations on Bingo Operations
ARTICLE III. BINGO AND RAFFLES
Sec. 3-20. Local Ordinance Adopted.
Pursuant to Section 18.2-340.8 of the Code of Virqinia, the
County shall requlate binqo qames and raffles. Article 1.1 of
Chapter 8 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virqinia, and all future
amendments thereof, (§ 18.2-340.1 et seq.) are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Sec. 3-21. Permit Required.
Prior to the commencement of any binqo qame or raffle by a
qualified orqanization, the orqanization shall obtain an annual
permit from the County. The finance director is desiqnated to
administer this article. The finance director, at his
discretion, may issue a permit upon compliance by an applicant
for a permit with the provisions of this article. All permits
shall be subiect to reasonable requlations by the finance
director to ensure the public safety and welfare in the operation
of binqo qames and raffles.
No permit to conduct binqo qames or raffles shall be denied,
suspended, or revoked except upon notice statinq the proposed
basis for such action and the time and place for a hearinq
thereon. After a hearinq on the issue, the finance director may
refuse to issue or may suspend or revoke any such permit if he
determines that the orqanization has not complied with the
provisions of this article. Any orqanization aqqrieved by the
decision of the finance director may appeal such decision to the
circuit court.
State law reference: §§ 18.2-340.3, 18.2-340.10, and 18.2-340.12
of the Code of Virginia
Sec. 3-22. Application Fee.
The application fee for the annual permit for a binqo qame
or raffle is waived by the County.
State law reference: § 18.2-340.2 of the Code of Virqinia
Sec. 3-23. Manaqement and Operation.
No person may manaqe, operate or conduct binqo qames or
raffles for more than two organizations.
State law reference: § 18.2-340.2:1 of the Code of Virqinia
Sec. 3-24. Special Provision for Booster Clubs.
Booster clubs which have been operatinq less than five
years, and which have been established solely to raise funds for
school-sponsored activities in public schools which are less than
five years old, may be issued a binqo or raffle permit.
2
state law reference:
§ 18.2-340.3 of the Code of Virqinia
Sec. 3-25.
Interim Tax-Exempt Status.
While an orqanization seeks tax-exempt status pursuant to
§ 501(c) of the United States Internal Revenue Code, it mav file
the same documentation submitted to the Internal Revenue Service
with the finance director and request an interim certificate of
the tax-exempt status. If such documentation is filed, the
finance director mav, after reviewinq such documentation as he
deems necessarv, issue a determination of tax-exempt status.
Such determination shall be made within sixtv davs of receipt of
such documentation. The finance director mav charqe a reasonable
fee, not to exceed $500. This interim certification of tax-
exempt status shall be valid until the Internal Revenue Service
issues its determination of tax-exempt status, or for eiqhteen
months, whichever is earlier.
State law reference: § 18.2-340.3 of the Code of Virqinia
Sec. 3-26. Required Percentaqe of Gross Receipts for Qualified
Participants.
A condition of everv binqo qame or raffle permit issued
shall be that a minimum of five percent of the qross receipts
from all binqo qames or raffles shall be used for (i) those
lawful reliqious, charitable, communitv or educational purposes
for which the orqanization is specificallv chartered or orqanized
or (ii) those expenses relatinq to the acquisition, construction,
maintenance, or repair of anv interest in the real propertv
involvinq the operation of the orqanization and used for lawful
reliqious, charitable, communitv or educational purposes.
State law reference:
§ 18.2-340.3 of the Code of Virqinia
Sec. 3-27. Audit of Reports, Fees.
All financial reports filed pursuant to § 18.2-340.6 of the
Code of Virqinia shall be audited bv the finance director;
provided, however anv financial report filed bv an orqanization
with qross receipts of less than $2,000 for the desiqnated
reportinq period shall be exempt from this audit requirement.
The finance director mav require the audit to be conducted
bv an independent auditor or accountant. If so required, there
shall be an audit fee equal to the actual cost of the audit.
Such fee shall be pavable to the finance director and shall
3
accompanv the annual report. No audit fee shall be charqed for
those audits conducted bv the finance director.
state law reference: § 18.2-340.7 of the Code of Virqinia
Sec. 3-28. Limitations on Binqo Operations.
Binqo qames shall be conducted onlv on the davs of the week
desiqnated in the permit. The hours of operation shall be
limited to the hours between 6:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. No
buildinq or other premises shall be used bv more than one
orqanization on anv one calendar dav to conduct binqo qames.
State law reference: § 18.2-340.9(D) of the Code of Virqinia
3 18 3 2.WPD
4
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
/ t? - ¿..-,r -2r
AGENDA TITLE:
Amendment to County Code
AGENDA DATE:
November 2, 1994
ACfION:
x
ITEM NUMBER:
J?Y#¿f?¿../ ~/,2-
INFORMATION:
SUBJECfIPROPOSAL/REOUEST:
Request for public hearing to amend Chapter 3 of the County
Code adding Sections 3-20 through 3-28 relating to Bin 0 and
Raffie Permits~CL-
~
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACfION:
INFORMATION:
A IT ACHMENTS:
STAFF CONTACfCS):
Messrs. Tucker, Huff, Breeden
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The County has been issuing bingo and rame permits to qualified organizations since 1973. Permits issued ITom 1973 to
1979 were regulated by conditions adopted by the Board of Supervisors on November 14, 1973. In 1979, the General
Assembly enacted Code of Virginia Sections 18.2-340.1, et seq which placed additional restrictions and requirements on
permits. The Board also appointed the Director of Finance as the local official to administer the bingo statutes. The County
has been issuing permits since 1979 under these Code Sections in conjunction with the guidelines established by the Board.
DISCUSSION:
The 1994 General Assembly changed Code of Virginia section 18.2-340.3(5) which deals with permit issuance. The change
requires the local governing body, by ordinance, to require that a certain percentage of an organization's gross receipts ITom
bingo games be used for those religious, charitable, community or education purposes for which they were chartered or for
expenses relating to the acquisition, construction, repair, or maintenance of real property used for their chartered purpose.
Since the change in this statute required an ordinance to be adopted, staff took this opportunity to review the Code of Virginia
for other local options which would be beneficial to include in this ordinance. Staff recommendations are ennumerated in the
attached Draft Ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that a public hearing be set to adopt these amendments.
BINGO.WP5
94.160
ORDINANCE NO. 94-10.1(1)
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 10.1, LAW ENFORCEMENT,
OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Supervisors of the
County of Albemarle, Virginia, that Chapter 10.1, Law Enforce-
ment, is hereby amended and reordained by amending Section 10.1-
2, Disposition of unclaimed personal property in possession of
law enforcement agencies, as follows:
Sec. 10.1-2. Disposition of unclaimed personal property in
possession of law enforcement agencies.
(a) Pursuant to § 15.1-133.01 of the Code of Virginia
(1950) as amended, any unclaimed personal property which has been
in the possession of the sheriff, the chief of police or any of
their duly authorized and acting deputies or officers and which
has remained unclaimed for a period of more than sixty (60) days
may be (i) sold at public sale as more particularly set forth
hereinafter or may (ii) be retained for use by the law
enforcement agency in possession of such property. As used
herein, "unclaimed personal property" shall be any personal
property belonging to another which has been acquired by a law
enforcement officer pursuant to his or her duties, which is not
needed in any criminal prosecution, which has not been claimed by
its rightful owner and which the State Treasurer has indicated
will be declined if remitted under the Uniform Disposition of
Unclaimed Property Act (section 55-210.1 et seq. of the Code of
Virginia) .
(b) Prior to the sale of any unclaimed item, the chief of
police, sheriff or their duly authorized agents shall make
reasonable attempts to notify the rightful owner of the property,
obtain from the commonwealth's attorney in writing a statement
advising that the item is not needed in any criminal prosecution
and cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation
in the locality, once a week for two successive weeks, notice
that there will be a public sale of unclaimed personal property.
Such property shall be described generally in the notice,
together with the date, time and place of the sale. The law
enforcement agency conducting the sale and/or at whose direction
the sale occurs shall pay from the proceeds of sale the cost of
advertisement, removal, storage, investigation as to ownership
and liens and notice of sale. The balance of the funds shall be
held by such agency for the owner and paid to the owner upon
satisfactory proof of ownership. No member of the sheriff's
department or the pOlice department, or any member of such
employee's immediate family, will be permitted to participate as
a purchaser in any sale of personal property hereunder.
ORDINANCE NO. 94-10.1(1)
(Page 2)
(c) If no claim has been made by the owner for the proceeds
of such sale within sixty (GO) days of the sale, the remaining
funds shall be deposited in the general fund of the county. Any
such owner shall be entitled to apply to the county within three
(3) years from the date of the sale and, if timely application is
made therefor, the county shall pay the remaining proceeds of the
sale to the owner without interest or other charges. No claim
shall be made, nor any suit, action or proceeding be instituted,
for the recovery of such funds after three (3) years from the
date of the sale.
(d) The chief of police is hereby constituted the agent of
the county for purposes of the administration of this section.
(e) As authorized by and pursuant to § 15.1-133 of the Code
of Virginia (1950), as amended, any bicycle or moped which has
been in the possession of the police department or sheriff's
department, unclaimed, for more than thirty (30) days, may be
sold at public auction or donated to a charitable organization,
in the discretion of the police department or sheriff's
department.
* * * * *
I, Ella W. Carey, do hereby certify that the foregoing
writing is a true, correct copy of an ordinance unanimously
adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of Albemarle County,
Virginia, at a regular meeting held on December 7, 1994.
r¿lh- W
Clerk, Board of County S
~ ,
I{i '"", 12."[22, q~
~"~7' '1..,;: I.; qLJ'II<tW . rio,
DRAFT: November 14, 1994
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER 10.1, LAW
ENFORCEMENT, OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE, VIRGINIA.
BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Albemarle, Virginia,
that Chapter 10.1, Law Enforcement, is hereby amended and reordained by amending
section 10.1-2, Disposition of unclaimed personal property in possession of law
enforcement agencies, as follows:
Sec. 10.1-2. Disposition of unclaimed personal property in possession of law
enforcement agencies.
(a) Pursuant to Section 15.1-133.01 of the Code of Virainia (1950) as amended,
any unclaimed personal property which has been in the possession of the sheriff, the
chief of police or any of their duly authorized and acting deputies or officers and which
has remained unclaimed for a period of more than sixty (60) days may be ill sold at
public sale as more particularly set forth hereinafter or may (ii) be retained for use by
the law enforcement aaencv in Dossession of such DroDertv. For the purposes of this
section, tho term As used herein. "unclaimed personal property" shall be any personal
property belonging to another which has been acquired by a law enforcement officer
pursuant to his or her duties, which is not needed in any criminal prosecution, which
has not been claimed by its rightful owner and which the State Treasurer has indicated
will be declined if remitted under the Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act
(section 55-210.1 et sea. of the Code of Virginia).
(b) Prior to the sale of any unclaimed item, the chief of police. sheriff or their
dulv authorized aaents shall make reasonable attempts to notify the rightful owner of
the property, obtain from the commonwealth's attorney in writing a statement advising
that the item is not needed in any criminal prosecution and cause to be published in a
newspaper of general circulation in the locality, once a week for two successive weeks,
notice that there will be a public sale of unclaimed personal property. Such property
·
~ I
shall be described generally in the notice, together with the date, time and place of the
sale. The chief of police law enforcement aaencv conductina the sale and/or at whose
direction the sale occurs shall pay from the proceeds of sale the cost of advertisement,
removal, storage, investigation as to ownership and liens and notice of sale. The
balance of the funds shall be held by such officer aaencv for the owner and paid to the
owner upon satisfactory proof of ownership. No member of the county sheriff's
department or the county police department, or any member of such employee's
immediate family, will be permitted to participate as a purchaser in any sale of personal
property hereunder.
(c) If no claim has been made by the owner for the proceeds of such sale within
sixty days of the sale, the remaining funds shall be deposited in the general fund of the
county. Any such owner shall be entitled to apply to the county within three years from
the date of the sale and, if timely application is made therefor, the county shall pay the
remaining proceeds of the sale to the owner without interest or other charges. No claim
shall be made, nor any suit, action or proceeding be instituted, for the recovery of such
funds after three years from the date of the sale.
(d) The chief of police is hereby constituted the agent of the county for purposes
of the administration of this section.
(e) As authorized bv and Dursuant to Section 15.1-133 of the Code of Virainia
(1950). as amended. any bicvcle or mODed which has been in the Dossession of the
Dolice deDartment or sheriff's deDartment. unclaimed. for more than thirty (30) days.
may be sold at Dublic auction or donated to a charitable oraanization. in the discretion
of the Dolice deDartment or sheriff's deDartment.
10_1_2.wPD
r
, · t
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Disposition of unclaimed personal property in possession
of law enforcement agencies.
AGENDA DATE:
November 16, 1994
ITEM NUMBER:
ACfION:
INFORMATION:
SUBJECfIPROPOSALIREOUEST:
Request for resolution of intent to hold a public hearing
to consider approval of ordinance No. _ to amend and
reordain Chapter 10.1, Law Enforcement, of the Code of
the County of Albemarle, Virginia
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACfION: X
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: YES
STAFF CONT ACf(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Trank, Miller
REVIEWED BY: t£tI
BACKGROUND:
Ordinance No. (to be assigned) amends Chapter 10.1 (a) by authorizing the Police Department or Sheriffs Department to
convert unclaimed property for department use. This ordinance also amends Chapter 10.1 by adding section (E) which pennits
that any bicycle or moped which has been in the possession of the Police Department or Sheriffs Department, unclaimed for
more than thirty (30) days, to be sold at public auction or donated to a charitable organization, at the discretion of the Police
Department or Sheriffs Department.
DISCUSSION:
The amendment to Chapter 10.1 "Law Enforcement" is necessary to bring the Code of the County of Albemarle, Virginia in
line with the Virginia State Code 15.1-133.01 (1950) as amended.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of a resolution of intent to hold a public hearing to consider amending and reordaining Chapter
10.1 "Law Enforcement" on December 7, 1994.
SUMMARY. TXT
94.168
- - -- - --- . -.-------------
~TE~~~~~----------------------------------
~ 111M N>. g:.-L~11Dl-1('2_'==________________________
~ 111M N9Æ f4f-fill) ICL~ºLDp1:ML6lpJt~Q----
DEFFRRID mflL Dr c-. \ ~, £::1 Ll
---------~--------------------------------
Po rm. 3
7/25/86
<..
Additional Public and Non-Profit Providers of Direct Training.
... i....}
Children, Youth & Family Services
Program description: Offers a course on operating a home day care service. The course is
offered twice a year in the evenings, and meets once a week for six weeks, plus an additional
class on first aid and CPR.
Population served: Open to anyone
Number of people in program: About 25 per class
Area served: Charlottesville and surrounding areas
Funding sources: Participants are charged a fee of $10 for materials and CPR training;
instructors are paid through several programs, including United Way, Work/Family
Directions, and the USDA Food Program.
Sources of information: Eileen Railton and Teresa Jackson 977-4260
Fluvanna County Schools
Program description: The high school offers 2-year programs in masonry, capentry & cabinet
making, occupational child care, and occupational food services, and 3-year programs in
business (including accounting, information systems, and office specialty) and agriculture.
Students in the occupational child care program get work experience at Head Start, and
those in the occupational food service program work in the high school and middle school
cafeterias.
Population served: High-school students
Number of people in program: Specific figures were not available, but it is estimated that
about 25% of the student body participates in the occupational/vocational programs.
Area served: Fluvanna County
Funding source: School budget
Source of information: Mary Bright 589-3666
Job trainin2 report Ol/28/94Hfile:dd\misc\wpjobtrs.doc) 15
Greene County Technical Education Center
Program description: Offers two-year programs in food occupations, cosmetology, health
assistant, building trades, auto mechanics, and child care.
Population served: High-school students; adults are also able to participate in the regular
two-year programs for a fee.
Number of people in program: There are usually about 10-12 students per class (with a first-
and second-year class for each program), for a total of about 130 students. There are
currently about 10 adults in the program, including five in cosmetology, one in auto
mechanics, and four in the health assistant program.
Area served: Greene County, although adult students from outside the county may
participate at a higher tuition rate.
Funding source: School budget, a small state reimbursement for vocational equipment, and
for adults, fees
Source of information: Gayle Collier 985-5239
Louisa County Schools
Program description: The high school offers business education including word processing,
office education, and accounting, as well as a cooperative office education program in which
students work half-time and attend school half-time. The trade and industrial program
includes auto mechanics, printing, and an industrial cooperative training (lCT) program
similar to the business program. Technology Education includes some introductory courses
and more specialized courses in such diverse fields as graphic communications,
communication systems, technology transfer, materials and processes technology,
manufacturing technology, advertising design, electronics technology, engineering drawing,
and architectural drawing. There are also programs for health occupations, agricultural
education, horticulture (including floral production and design and greenhouse, landscape,
and nursery management), and consumer/occupational home economics (including life
management skills, culinary arts, and child care occupations). Louisa schools also offerabout
three evening vocational classes for adults each year, in topics such as drafting and
woodworking.
Population served: Primarily high school students, but also the general public through the
evening courses
Number of people in program: In 1993, 282 students were in the business education
program, 80 in auto mechanics, 96 in ICT, 253 in technology education, 50 in health
Job trainine report (11/28/94)(file:dd\misc\wpjobtrs.doc) 16
occupations, 86 in agricultural education, 109 in horticulture, and 124 in
consumer / occupational home economics. Adult class sizes are usually between ten and
twenty. Of those high school students who completed a vocational program in 1993, by the
following December 6% were employed in the area in which they were trained, 17% were
employed in a related area, 35% were employed in an unrelated area, 19% had gone on to
higher education, 1 % were in the military, 4% were unemployed, and 19% could not be
reached for the survey.
Area served: Louisa County
Funding source: School budget, some funding from Carl Perkins; adults are charged a fee.
Source of information: Karen Cole (703) 894-5436
Nelson County Schools
Program description: Programs are offered through the high school. Auto mechanics, health
occupations, building trades, food services, and drafting are offered as two-year programs.
Cosmetology is offered as a three-year program, agriculture is a four-year program, and
horticulture has a one-year introduction and then courses available in plant production and
landscaping. The business program offers a wide variety of courses: typing, record keeping,
accounting, accounting computer applications, business computer applications, office systems,
word processing, business law and management, and a financial management employment
seminar are all included. A consumer home economics program is also offered, including
a life management skills class and a specialized home economics course.
Population served: High-school students
Number of people in program: There are currently 25 students in auto mechanics, 19 in
health occupations, 22 in building trades, 21 in food services, 39 in drafting, 43 in
cosmetology, 81 in agriculture, 73 in the horticulture courses, and 58 in the consumer home
economics courses. Numbers in the business classes vary widely and are no~ un duplicated,
as students may take more than one course at a time; students also take business courses
who are not otherwise in the vocational program. The most popular business courses are
typing, with 100 students, and business computer applications, with 72. The smallest course
is the financial management employment seminar, with J 1 students.
Area served: Nelson County
Funding source: School budget
Sources of information: Charlie Bennett and Darryl Nelson 263-8317
Job traininl! report lll/28/94)(file:dd\misc\wpiobtrs.doc) 17
Virginia Department of Social Services -- Division of Licensing
Program description: Pre-application counseling is offered to those who wish to obtain day-
care licensing (necessary for a home day care center with more than 8 children or for a day
care center not located in a private home). After licensure, training is offered at locations
around the region on a variety of day-care-related topics such as discipline, health screening,
nutrition, and playground safety.
Population served: Primarily licensed day care providers (with counseling available to those
wishing to become licensed), but some training courses are available to the general public.
Number of people in program: The class size for training courses may vary from 20 to 100,
depending on the venue and the topic to be covered.
Area served: The Verona office service area covers the area from Winchester to Augusta
and Highland to Albemarle and therefore includes Charlottesville, Albemarle, and Greene.
Nelson County is covered by the Roanoke/Piedmont office, and Fluvanna and Louisa by the
Central/Richmond office.
Source of information: Patty Milici (703) 248-9347
#
Job traininl! report (ll/28/94)(file:dd\misc\wpjobtrs.doc) 18
t'
¡Pc I' L.:f\'r-, ro~.~")r-:"n;
n~1 1~~.b2~.'A ,,, ,"""d,.
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
1995 Preliminary Reassessment Values
AGENDA DATE:
December 7, 1994
ITEM NUMBER: )
~.IZ01{1C4
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
x
SUBJECTIPROPOSAUREOUEST:
1995 Preliminary Reassessment Values
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACTION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS: Yes
~
STAFF CONT ACT(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Breeden, Walters
REVIEWED BY:
DISCUSSION:
The 1995 biennial real estate reassessment cycle is nearing completion. The Notice of Reassessment is scheduled to be mailed to real estate owners
on December 30, 1994. The attached 1995 PRELlM1NAR Y REASSESSMENT SUMMARY estimates the fair market value of taxable real estate
to be $5.417 billion, a $442.4 million ( 8.89%) increase over the 1993 reassessment. The preliminary increase is attributed to $195.9 million
(3.94%) in new construction, additions, and property divisions and $246.5 million (4.95%) in market value appreciation. The preliminary
appreciation increase resulting trom the reassessment is estimated to be 4.95% for the biennium, 2.48% on an annualized basis. The 4.95%
increase is a combined increase for both land and buildings. Preliminary results estimate buildings appreciating at 2.43%, developed land at
5.02%, and raw undeveloped land at 7.00%.
The negative nwnber for Charlottesville new construction and land divisions is due to several significant parcels being reclassified from taxable
real estate to tax exempt. The Town of Scottsville new construction and land divisions values are high due to the recent annexation. The overall
10.46% increase trom 1993 to 1995 results from the annexation; the 3.30% 1995 increase over 1994, adjusted for the annexation, is in line with
other districts.
Please note that these numbers are averages as well as estimates. The values will change when both the reassessment and appeal processes are
completed. Additionally, these values are for taxable real estate only and do not include government or other tax exempt properties. Realizable
revenues will be less than the fair market value after adjustments for land use, tax relief, and uncollectible taxes are taken into account. These
reductions are estimated during the budget proces~.
The 1995 reassessment cycle began in August 1993. It is based on sale transactions prior to that time. Transactions after August 1993 are used
as a guide and are generally not utilized unless significantly different from the August 1993 data. The principal of uniformity requires that a
countywide cutoff date be established and the same data be used for all reassessments.
RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the 1995 Preliminary Reassessment Report.
94.171
.I
>-
cr:
<
::;:
::;:
::J
(/
I-
Z
W
::;:
(/
(/
W
(/
(/
<
W
cr:
>-
cr:
<
Z
5Ë
:J
W
cr:
D..
I/)
CD
CD
~
~
W
~W.,.
I-~CD
ZW(/
~~~
ffi~CD
11-
W
~W...
I-~OI
ZW(/
Wcr:>
001/)
ffi~OI
11-
>-~
cr:W
<::;:
~g¡~
~~I-
W(/
cr:<
D..W
0:
~
c:;~~
CDcr:1-
~::J
o
~.
w.
>-::;:Z
cr:(/ O
<(/ -
ZWI-
-(/ <
::;:(/ -
:J<O
WWW
cr:cr:æ
11-1/)D..
CD<
CD
~
>-
cr:
<
::;:
::;:
::J
(/
I-
o
ã:
I-
(/
ëi
~W
w::J
>-::;:;¡¡!
cr:(/ >
<(/ I-
Zww
5Ë(/ :.;:
:J(/ cr:
w«
cr:~::;:
D..I/)cr:
CDë(
~11.
~w
W::J
::;:..J
(/ ~
(/ I-
Ww
(/ :.;:
(/ cr:
«
~::;:
...!!:
CD<
~11.
.,.¡¡j~
CD0::J
~~O
D..O
* * * * * * * *1
.,.,...NNNI/)O...
..,...-CO..-(W)N(")....
(').o.n(')(')...:(')0
* * * * * * * *1
N('II)""II)U')(I)C)C")
.....(") N..-(") 11)""""
(').0.0(')(')"':00
1O,......,.O.....OfO.....~
(J)It)It)COQIÐON
COQ(J)O..-It),....CO
,..:òoò,..:añ;ui....
co..... an........ coc:o......
,....co a"Q co......
añ c? co· co" ..¡ fÔ
"'OCD"''''I/)<OCO~
N..,.O.....(J)œCOa
.,....<0.,..,....,...<0
,,;öÑÑuicôoi,....
QCIOCOCOCO.....,.........
11)11)..,.............-
w)(I)-oôoò..,.-fIi
fD.....O,......,.C:ONN~
CO(")(,)(W)'llltOfDCO
..,.......OCW)NCOQCO
"'¡ÒQÒ~"¡"'¡f'.
QCOIft,.......,.OC\l......
,....,.........C')OU)CO
uiôc-uiN-"¡
NC") U)C')N co
.
>
~
W
Z
ÔOOOOOO~
00000.,.00
COQ..,...-(II).....CO.....
......-(I)-,..:a:;;Ô...:......
<OO,...CD 0 1/)""
......,.Q...-Q),...O
<'iÑ"':Ñò<'i"':
-T""T""..... C?.....
~
<0,... 0,...'" CO NN!
:g~~g¡~~~:;;
CO" 0) aj' ai Ñ 0" N- 10
""(J)CJ)(")M,....a,....
CONNoaa..............
(").. oi .,,¡ 0- fD- tti ati N
ON'llltcøCOU')N
CO 10 N..,...... CO Q
W
.,.::J
CD..J
CD<
~>
II-
~~
wO:
cr:<
cr:::;:
::Jcr:
Oë(
11.
000000001
~~~~g~~~
Ñoiooõòò"':co
....-..COQcoU)an
......1l).....CO......-(J)....
,..:oòOÒ(l)...,,¡;.....N
,....(J)......(I)fOQ)C\I
...... T"".........CO co
000000001
0000000..-
Ø)II)COlOfØ(W)CJ)N
aiiñÑòQIl)-a-(J)
0..... co,....co......co 10
o..............co0<0 """
òfliÒ.,.....,..:OÒ,..:N
COCO <ON I/) I/)
,......,.q,~coco
~ :: 0 : ~ ~ ~ ~I
CO,......N,....NN
<'iÑ"':otiotiò
W
..J
..J
W s:
..J (/
== cr: ~
iJil- ~W 0
WI- ..J..J..Jg
~W 5Ë==;¡¡! (/
oð;2..JiJi:d';;¡¡!
..J""ZW~Wzcr:
~:';:<~o!::3:W
:X:O><O:X:O~
0~ä:(/ (/ 3:f-::;:
~I
~I
11
;:
~
o
...
N
,...
...
<0
<0
co
N
o
I/)
<0
.,.
N
o
.,.
~
o
.,.
CD
I/)
CD
~
<0
r:.
I/)
I/)
...
,...
;:
I/)
o
I/)
co
N
I/)
co
o
,...
~
I/)
o
r:.
N
¡;;
.,.
,...
CD
.,.
~jl
..J
<
I-
o
I-
* * * * * *1
COQONN..-
il)NCOCON..,.
M~MM"":"":
* * * * * *1
N""U')(J)""'U')
0(')00"....-
(').........:...:
"'CO"'I/)"'CO
......(J)CONO)U)
..,.an(ØI'-NN
0) (Ø-a:ic?.nM
ID co........,. (J)O
o co,..... CON
.,.: ....... .,.: .- ft)- (I)
N""O~"'<O~
0......(\1(1)0)
OO""'MCO..-
r-:«ic?ÒÒN
""'OIl)COMCO
CONCON~O)
Ò~~"CO~N
~"'''''NCO'''I
M"'It'COvCO(J)
fD..-vO)..-"It'
Ñc?oi~cô"'"
..-"It'(")O)OO
..-,....,.... CO 11)"""
M~fÒCO~Ñ..O
II)CO NCM
>-
cr:
<
::;:
::;:
::J
(/
(/
(/
<
..J
o
OOOOÔO~
OOO~oO
CO~NII)<?II)
~Ñ~~c?o
CO fD CON CO(J)
CO.,.CO....,.CO
,....~ (J)- Pi oi fD~ T'"
N..-..-(f)-
~
~"'''''NCO'''~
M"I:I"COO)U)(J)
fDll)ll)O'JIl)M
oi cti iii M~ O)~ co
NMNCO,....O'J
O,...~..-COCO
fÒc?"CÔ"':"':"",
(")N(")..-II),-
~~N<D(J)v
000000
00011)00
Ov..-O"l:l"O'J
,....~II)~CO~(J)-~M
"-O)COCO""'(J)
0) MCOv..-..-
N~ u:i 0)- ~ M "'"
COII)N(J)(J)..-
"1:1"_ ~ N II) co "It'
0000001
OOO~OO
NO(J)II)""""I:I"
an- M~ .,...- 'IlIt'- "1:1"- M
MMNU)II)O
o (J)CO..-fDM
ari fÒ iii iii 0)- N
II)M..-Il)(J)..-
~~NIl)CO"'lt'
z
i'ã ..J
Zcr: ~ææ
<::J ~cr:cr:
IDID (/ 00
cr:::J ::J«
:J(/ >-OOCJ)
;.!..;.!..==~~:J
====~:::.o~
::;:::;:u..~1-0
«wOOO
LLLL..JOCN..-
W W D.. W I I
..J..JI=::;:OO
C)C)..J::'¡¡:¡¡:
~~:JO(! (!
(/ CJ)::;:0c{c{
šl
!I
i
I
¡j
o
.,.
o
.,.
CD
I/)
CD
~
<0
r:.
I/)
I/)
...
,...
;;:
I/)
o
I/)
co
N
I/)
co
o
....
I/)
o
~
....
N
c;;
.,.
,...
CD
.,.
..J
c{
I-
o
f-
* *1
""0
~C!
.,.,...
* *1
1/)<0
O!~
.,.<0
~ N
<01/)
CDN
.¡~
O~
0,...
";1/)
...
~ CDi
.,.~
~<O
0,...
......
N. ...
""1/)
...
<0 CD~
<O~
CO I/)
N'"
OCD
1/). co
<O~
","I/)
N
0;
","0
~...
Ò...
.,.<0
CD CO
oli...
CD
<0 CD!
~CD
"'.,.
I/) CD
I/)N
"'N
....-...
~CD
.,.. ....
I/)
001
I/) CO
CO CD
NI/)
I/)M
co...
ò~
.....,.
~.""
I/)
00
~CO
,.... N
NCD
~CD
CD~
""1/)
.....,.
CD. ....
"'"
I-
Z
W
~~
I1.W
111.
D..u..
OW
cr:O
D..1
W
WCJ)
ãP
<0
xz
C{C{
f-..J
~II
~I
CD
o
,...
...
CD
N
...
...
N
I/)
N
CD
co
;;;
,...
.,.
...
CD
o
<0
.,.
CD
o
.,.
.,.
...
o
co
CD
CD
~
,...
N
<0
N
"'"
N
<0
.,.
o
,...
co
'"
;n
CD
N
.,.
.,.
o
M
.,.
...
r:.
CD
N
N
.,.
I-
Z
W
::;:
cr:
W
11.
11.
W
o
cr:
W
l-
ll.
<
W
(/
c{
In
X
c{
f-
ãi
2
..
:J
ãi
>
Gí
-"
:;¡
E
:!
"'"
CD
CD
~
¡:
!
:;
u
ell
:;
E
o
.::
¡:
..
E
II>
II>
..
II>
II>
os
!
II>
.!'J
ell
:;
C>
.s
ü
os
1í
:J
II>
»
.<>
"t]
.SI
:J
Q.
E
o
u
.!!!
""
ê!
..
E
II>
II>
ell
II>
II>
os
!
ê!
..
E
II>
II>
ell
II>
II>
os
!
ell
:;
£
..
:J
"t]
ell
:J
ãi
>
Gí
-"
j¡j
E
1ií
.!'J
£
..
u
c
ïii
"t]
ell
"t]
Õ
u
!
II>
C
o
ï;;
.S;
'ij
"t]
c
.!'J
"t]
c
os
c
o
~
È
II>
C
o
u
~
..
C
II>
¡:
..
II>
ell
êi.
!
~
o
~
W
Z
:!
.s
ell
II>
os
..
t;
.s
£
II>
¡:
..
II>
..
êi.
!
z
o
¡::
c{
õ
W
a:
(L
D..
<
f
)
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR
94/95
NUMBER
940032
TYPE OF APPROPRIATION
ADDITIONAL
TRANSFER
NEW
x
ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED ?
YES
NO
x
FUND
GRANT
PURPOSE OF APPROPRIATION:
REAPPROPRIATION OF SOIL AND WATER GRANT.
EXPENDITURE
COST CENTER/CATEGORY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
1154041055520100 POSTAL SERVICES $200.00
1154041055950012 SOIL & WATER-DWP PROJECT 38,009.83
TOTAL
$38,209.83
REVENUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
************************************************************************
2154033000330310
EPA-DIV SOIL & WATER DWP
$38,209.83
TOTAL
$38,209.83
************************************************************************
REQUESTING COST CENTER:
ENGINEERING
APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE
DATE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
//- ~ -5?~,i\
/c:¿ -9~ ~~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
·
;L-. \"i~'¡~JI:TFi':: j ~') 80/.\;<}· MEN<~tR:~
m:~[fL' Cl4--.-
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA TITLE:
Reappropriation of Soil and Water Grant
AGENDA DATE:
December 7, 1994
ITEM NUMBER: )
q-~ .1'2ClT (1W
ACfION: X
INFORMATION:
SUBJECf/PROPOSAL/REOUEST:
Approval of Appropriation #940032 in the amount of
$38,209.83 for second year of two-year grant.
CONSENT AGENDA:
ACfION:
INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
~
STAFF CONT ACf(S):
Messrs. Tucker, Breeden
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
On October 7,1993, the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the
County of Albemarle and the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Soil and Water Conservation.
The MOA pertains to a grant received by the Department of Engineering to supplement a stormwater and nonpoint source
pollution study being sponsored by the County of Albemarle, the City of Charlottesville, and the University of Virginia. The
grant outlines sixteen milestones, ranging from data collection on best management practices to education and outreach
activities for pollution reduction. The grant is a two-year grant, terminating on September 30, 1995.
DISCUSSION:
Remaining funds need to be reappropriated in order to conduct the second year of grant activities.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of Appropriation #940032 in the amount of $38,209.83 for the Soil and Water Grant.
SOIL&H20
94.178
DATE~~~~~_______________________________
AGRÐ\ ITIM N). 9-'1~[2L21~~7D:J________________________
AGRÐ\ ITIM N9.£ em - CN· ð{, LtREF
- -- -----------------------------------
IFPFRRID lNfIL Jx~--l~L~LlflþJ~-lkL~---
Form. 3
7/25/86
- ---- --------"----- ---------------------
~TE__~~~~-f1~____________________________________
A<Drn. ITIM N>. -~Ll~J2Q]_~](X¡~__________________________
A(DO\ ITlMNM! .iJ;Ll3.1'i~~__
DFFFRRIÐ lNrIL ---.hnlLQ~2t~-Ìì't~__
--./
Fo rm. 3
7/25/86
DECEMBER 7, 1994
EXECUTIVE SESSION MOTION
I MOVE THAT THE BOARD GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 2. I -344(A) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
UNDER SUBSECTION (7) TO DISCUSS 2 MAlTERS OF PENDING
LITIGATION, ONE REGARDING A ZONING APPEAL AND THE OTHER
REGARDING THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY, AND 3 LEGAL
MAlTERS REGARDING A LANDFILL, A TAX ISSUE, AND AN
INSURANCE ISSUE.
;':ri'[02~-qlJ:\[ \\BSP~
VIrginia Cooperative Extension
ViIg4&a
IlII Tech
(lip
Charlolksvillc/ Albemarle Office
mailing addrcss: 401 McIntire Road
physical addrcss: 168 Spolnap Road
Charlottcsvillc, Virginia 22902·4596
Phonc (804) 984·0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22, 1994
Mr. V. Wayne Cilimberg
Planning & Community Development
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
Dear Mr. Cilirnberg:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
SiI].cerely, --Ii
Q:;1in::1!i~
Extension Agent/4-H
CV: lhd
Copies: ~oard of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
(,a/lJ·GrwlI U/li\'eI"silies-- Till' Commo/lu'l'a/ril 1.1" Ollr Call1l'lIs
Exle/l.\'irl/l is a JOi/lll'rogmlll of Virgi/lia Tech. \ ïl~~i/lia Slall' Ullil'ersil.\', IiiI' U.S. Del'arlmelll or AgriclIlllIre. a/ld slall' alld local go\'{'mmellls.
Virg.inia ~oop~ralive Ex(cnsion programs and employment arc open tn all. regardless of r~ce. color. religion, sex, age.
veteran statu'). nauonal origin. disability. or pollllcal affiliation. An equal opportllllllyhlfflrma!l\'c action cmployer
VIrginia Cooperative Extension
Virgigla
rIlTech
.
Charlottesville! Albemarle Office
mailing address: 40 I Mcintire Road
physical address: 168 Spotnap Road
Charloltesville, Virginia 22902·4596
Phone (804) 984-0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22, 1994
Sheriff Terry W. Hawkins
Albemarle County Sheriff's Office
POBox 203
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Sheriff Hawkins:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
S~}ìcerely, I
'if / 7/ 'p /
. !z t (;ílf;.. / /l1/JZj/~
"-christy}J-ines
Extensi£Ón Agent/4-H
CV: lhd
Copies:
Board of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
Land-Gram Univer.\'ilies- The Commo1/\1"ealth Is Ollr Camplts
Extension is a joint program l!fVirginia Tech, Virginia State Unil'ersity, the U.S. Department of AgriculTllre, and stall' and local glll'I'/"II/llent.1'.
Yirgînia Cooperative Extensi?n programs and cn~rloym~_nt_ are open to all. regardless. of race. cu.ior. rel.igion. sex, age.
vclcral1 slalUs. nalion~ll origlB. Jisabiiit). ur polilicaJ <.11 illatioll. AI1 cljuJ.1 oppurtulluy/anïnn;.nl \ C action employer.
VIrginia Cooperative Extension
Vi1:gi.llia
IliI Tech
.,
Charlottcsvillel Albcmarlc Officc
mailing address: 40 I Mclntirc Road
physical addrcss: 168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesvillc, Virginia 22902·4596
Phone (804) 984-0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22, 1994
Mr. Bill Brent
Albemarle County Service Authority
168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Brent:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
Sincer:ely, /.
cG~;f (;if- -~tt~
'-/'. ,,'~/ V ;/1
I
hristy¡JVines
Extension Agent/4-H
CV: lhd
Copies:
Board of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
Lalld-Grallt Ulli¡·ersities-- nle COI/1I/101l11'caltllls Ollr Cal/11'lIS
Ertellsioll is ajoillt progral/1 oj Virginia Tech, Virginia Stal<' Uni\'ersity. tire U.S. Departl/1cnt ofAgricu/¡ure, and stale and local go\'ernl/1cllts.
VIrginia Co{)perati~e Extension progr~i~ns and cmJ~loYl1lcnt arc open 10 all. rcganJlcss. of race. color. rchgion. sc:\., age,
veteran status, natIOnal L)rigin, JIs<:lbJlIt). ur poliucal aITilií..Hion. All ~qu.d opportullHy/allïnnatJ\.c JI..:{1U1l cmploycr
Virginia Cooperative Extension
ViIg4}ia
1111 Tech
!lIP
Charlottesville! Albemarle Offiee
mailing address: 401 Mcintire Road
physical address: 168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (804) 984-0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22, 1994
Mr. Robert J. Walters, Jr.
Department of Finance
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA. 22902-4596
Dear Mr. Walters:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
Sincerely, ~I
// I - J, '4 .J
/J..A~{i?rj )1tt,
\...J:hrist-ý/Vines
Extension Agent/4-H
CV: lhd
Copies:
Board of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
Land-Grant Vnh'l'rsitil'.\"~ n,l' COlI/mo/lll"ea!11t !s Ollr Call/fllls
Erlension is ujoill! program o(Virginiu Teelt, Virginiu Slule Vnil'ersily, lite V.S. Del'Urlll/enl (~(Agricllllllre, und slule und lowl gOl"anll/enls.
V;,rgillla Cooperative Exten.sion p~ogr~ms an.d em~loymen[. are 0pcn to all. regardlcs.s, of race, co.lor. rel.igion. sex, age,
\clcran :.lalu:., nJtiunaJ ongill. JI~ablli(). lH pohuc<il aftJI¡J.lJUIJ, All cljual opponunlty/afflfIllJtl\c adlOn cmpluycr
VIrginia Cooperative Extension
ViIg4}la
II1l Tech
.
Charlottcsvillc! Albcmarlc Officc
mailing addrcss: 40 I McIntirc Road
physical addrcss: 168 Spotnap Road
Charlottcsvillc. Virginia 22902·4596
Phone (804) 984-0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22, 1994
Captain Gene Rhodenizer
Charlottesville Police Department
606 E. Market Street
Charlotesville, VA 22901
Dear Capt. Rhodenizer:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
~~ere~y<, . /---: .
~¿f;~:ø~e~ þ~/
Extension Agent/4-H
CV: lhd
Copies:
Board of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
Lnlld-Granl Univer.\"ilies- 1ïte Cllmmllllll'eall/1 Is Ollr Camplls
EXlellsill1l is a jllill I program (~l Virgillia Tecll. \'irgillia Slale Ulli\'er-rily, 1/11' u.s. Departmelll II/Agricll/lure. alld slale alld IlIcal gllvernmellts.
Vi,rginia C.'ooperuliv.e Extcn.si~)fl progr~l~l1s andemploYI11~.~'. a~c open 10 all. regardless of race. color. rel.igion. \CX, <.Igc,
\ctcran statu."', nauonal or/gill. dlsJhlil\y. or polillcal alttllalwn. All cyual tJpportllfJIly/affirrl1<tti\T ~1í,.:tlon cmplo)'<"f
VIrginia Cooperative Extension
Vilg4&a
IlIIIl Tech
.
Charlottesville I Albemarle Office
mniling address: 401 McIntire Road
physicnl address: 168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (804) 984-0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22, 1994
Ms. Teresa R. Turner
Virginia Employment Commission
P. O. Box 2063
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Ms. Turner:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
QSil~ce~elY' 7
./. / ~ .
./ ..--r I i
. . /.' ,/"" J'._ ' ./
J<tC4t,r' .)t1Li:r-'
rlstyJVlnes
Extension Agent/4-H
CV: lhd
Copies:
Board of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
Land-Gml1l Universilies- n1l' COl1/l1/Of1\"eallh Is Ollr Cal1/pll.\
Lrlension IS a joinl progral1/ of Virginia Tech, Virgin ill Slale Univasil\", Ihe U.S. /Jepartl1/Cnl (1Agricllllllrc, and slale and local íi01'eI1lI1lCl/I.I,
Y;rginia Coopcra(I\:e Extcl1.si~m progr~~s and cn~ploym~.~lt. a~c open 10 ¡I! I. regardless of race. CO,lnr, rcl.igion. sex, age,
vèleran ~tatu:-. l1allUnal Origin, JlsaoLl¡().l,r polith:al a dli.llloJ1. 1\11 C4U¡I opportunily/affJnl1,I!I\'C action employer.
VIrginia Cooperative Extension
ViIgillia
IlI1 Tech
.
Charlottesville! Albemarle Office
mailing address: 401 Mcintire Road
physical address: 168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (804) 984·0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22, 1994
Ms. Suzanne Brady
Thomas Jefferson Health District
P. O. Box 7546
Charlottesville, VA 22906
Dear Ms. Brady:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
Si!2-cerely, I
c;// ~ /}/' !
~L-~ L¿'J~J~t /J-U_"-/·
risty vInes
Extension Agent/4-H
CV: lhd
Copies:
Board of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
Land-Grant Uni\'ersitie.\"- nil' C(I!/tmon\l'ea!rh r, Gill' Ca/1/!m.1
Ertl'l1sion is lljointprogra/1/ of Virgin ill Tech. Virginill StiliI' Uni\'ersity, t/I<' U.S. Depllr/menl (!!Agricultllre, and slale and local riOl'emll/mls.
Virginia Cooperat.ive E\ten.si~m p:ogr~l~ls and eI11I~lnym~.~lt. a~e open 10 all. regarJIc<"s of race. color. religion. sex, agL'~
n'lcran ~talU"', 1},1IIonal Oflglll, lÌJ....dn¡]¡(), (If politIcal alld ,ilHHL An c.:qu;,¡1 ílpportlll1lty/~tfrirn1~ltI\\' J,ction cmployer
VIrginia Cooperative Exten90n
Virg4&a
Il[]l Tech
.
Charlottesville! Albemarle Office
mailing address: 401 McIntire Road
physical addNss: 168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (804) 984-0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22, 1994
Mrs. Cheryl Schnelle
Rivanna Solid Waste Authority
P. O. Box 979
Charlottesville, VA. 22902
Dear Mrs. Schnelle:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
/'
I
'l,l.
j/I¿7J.>:.J
CV: lhd
Copies:
Board of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
Land-Gram Unil'l'rsilies- The Coml11o/lll'{'allh 1.1" Ollr Caml'lIs
Ex/ension is a joim program of Virginia Tecll, Virginia Sla/e Unil'{'/"si/y, Ihe U.S. Departmenl (<f"llgricul/lIre, and Slall' and local g()\'emmellls.
Virginia Cooperativc Extension programs anJ employmcnt arc open to all. regardless of race. coJor. religion. sex, age.
veteran \lalll.'\, national origin, disability. or political affiliation. An equal nrrortunilY/¡:lffim1dti\c action cmployer
VIrginia Cooperative Extension
Virgillia
rmI Tech
.
Charlottesvilld Albemarle Office
mailing address: 401 McIntire Road
physical address: 168 Spotnap Road
CLarlottesville. Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (804) 984·0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22, 1994
Ms. Deborah S. Gibson
Charlottesville/Albemarle/UVA
Emergency Operation Center
P. o. Box 911
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Ms. Gibson:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
Sincerely,
6,t(,~,> J~~i
Lfhristy ines
Extensf n Agent/4-H
CV: lhd
Copies:
Board of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
Lalld·Grallt Ulli,'ersilies- The CO/ll/llollwealth Is Ollr Camilli.'
Erll'lIsÙ!/l is ajoillt program of Virgillia Tech, Virgillia Slall' Ulli\'ersit\", Ihe U.S. Depart/lll'llt of AgriclIllure, alld st/lll' alld local gm'I'f"II/IlI'lItS.
Virginia Cooperative Extcnsion program~ anò employmcnt are open to all. rcgardk....s of race, color. religion. sex, age.,
veteran statu..,. nationa! origin. di,ahiJity, or political alïilialion An t:qual 0prortlJl1ily/alï¡rm~l!lv~ ':H.:tion cmployer.
VIrginia Cooperative Extem,ion
Vilginia
rlf]lTech
.
Charlottesvillel Albemarle Office
mailing address: 401 McIntire Road
physical address: 168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902·4596
Phone (804) 984-0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22, 1994
Mr. C. R. Ma yo
Commonwealth of Virginia
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
P. O. Box 8086
Charlottesville, VA 22906
Dear Mr. Mayo:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
Sj-ncerely '.. ,.
/lí~J:~oY
~~ristyf.Nines
Extension Agent/4-H
CV: lhd
Copies:
Board of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
Land·(ÎmJII Unil'ersities- The Common\l'ealth /s Our Camplls
Erlellsioll is a joint program oj" Virginia Tech, Virginia Stllte Unil'ersity, the U.S. DeplIrtment oj"Agr¡cullure, 1IIld slllte lInd local gorernment.\".
Virginia (:ooperativc Extension p:()gra~ns and cmployment are 0rcn to all. regardless. of race. c010r. religion, sex, age.
veteran status, national ongin. dlsahillly, or polit¡l'al affiliatIon. An equal opportulllly/aITirm:,ul\'C ¡¡(lion employer
VIrginia Cooperative Extension
ViJ:ginJa
IlI1 Tech
!lIP
Charlottesvillel Albemarle Office
mailing address: 401 Mcintire Road
physical address: 168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (804) 984-0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22, 1994
Chief Britt M. Grimm
Charlottesville Fire Department
203 Ridge Street
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Dear Chief Grimm:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
Sincerely, .
'//.' . '/1/' .
(,-}é~ ßI¿éµ/
Lchristg Vines
Extension Agent/4-H
CV: lhd
Copies:
Board of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
Land-Grant Universities- The COll/ll/ol/\\"ealtllls Our Call/plioi'
Extension is ajoint prograll/ oj Virginia Tec/¡, Virginia SlurI' Unl\'ersitv, the US. Departll/ent of Agricultllre, and statc and local governll/cnts.
V~~-ginia ~ooperati\'c EXlcnsion progralll~ and cmployment arc open 10 all. regardless, of racc. color. religion. I\CX. age.
veteran status. national origin. di_l.,ahilil~, or r0]¡tlcal alÏïIJa¡ion. /\n equal opportun!I:,jaffirnutl\t2 action cmployer.
VIrginia Cooperative Extension
Vírg4&a
Iml Tech
.
Chnrlottesvillel AlbemarI.: Office
mailing addrcss: 401 McJntirc Road
physical address: 168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesvillc, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (804) 984-0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22, 1994
Mr. Dennis C. Friedrich
Zoning Department
County of Albemarle
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
Dear Mr. Friedrich:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
~i ,erely,
Jítd/ 1~~
risty 'ð-nes
Extension Agent/4-H
CV: lhd
Copies:
Board of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
Lalld-elmllT UlliversiTies-- Till' COIllIl1OI/l\'eallh Is DlIr Call/l'lIs
Ex/ellsioll is ajoillll'rogralll oIVirginia Tech. Virgillia STale UniversiTY, Ihl' U.S. f)l'l'arTllle1I{ o/A¡;riclIllUre, alld staTe alld local ¡;O\'el"/lllll'nTs.
V¡rgini~ Coopcralivc Extcnsion programs and employmcnt arc open 10 all. rcgardle'\s of r<.JC~, color, religion, sex, age,
\'l'(t~rall slalU:>.. naLion¡j origin. Jisabiiity. or political affiliatioll. An equal npponllnil)iuHirll1i\tivè a(lion employer.
VIrginia Cooperative Extension
ViIgillia
fill Tech
.
Charlottesvillel Albemarle Office
mailing address: 401 McIntire Road
physical address: 168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville. Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (804) 984-0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22, 1994
Mr. Robert Crickenberger
Dept. of Parks & Recreation
401 McIntire Road
Charlottesville, VA 22902-4596
Dear Mr. Crickenberger:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8, 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
Sincerely,
- /
,/ , . I
(:Jktlß{:/j{l~(]//
'christy 1ines
Extension Agent/4-H
CV: lhd
Copies:
Board of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
Lmlil·(Jmlll Uni\'l'/"sitics- 7111' COI1lI1lOlI\\'cl1llh Is Our Cl1l11pUS
Exll'l/sion is a joinl program of Virginia Tt'ch, Virginia Slate UnÌl'crsity, Ihc u.s. DCf'arlmenl o{Agricullllrc. and stale and local gm'emmenls.
Vi.rginia Cooperative EXlen.sion progr,~u.l1S and clllploymc~lt a~c open to all. rcgardlcs.... of race. color. religion, sex, age.
\t,'teran qatu:-.. n:tllonal origin, di'anll1ty, or political affllial1on. /\n equal Oppor1ünlty/alflm1í.ltivc aCliol1 employer.
VIrginia Cooperative Extension
ViIgillia
Iml Tech
!lIP
Charlottesville/ Albemarle Office
mailing address: 401 Mcintire Road
physical address: 168 Spotnap Road
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902-4596
Phone (804) 984·0727 FAX (804) 984-0735
November 22/ 1994
Mr. Richard Defibaugh
Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority
P. O. Box 18
Charlottesville, VA 22902
Dear Mr. Defibaugh:
The Youth-In-Government Day for the senior government students
at Charlottesville High School and Albemarle High School scheduled
for Thursday, December 8/ 1994 has been cancelled due to lack of
participation from local government agencies. Out of the seventy-
five agencies contacted to be a part of this learning experience,
only fourteen responded.
Thank you for your offer to assist us in this program. We are
tentatively planning to offer Youth-In-Government Day again in April
and will be in contact with you after the first of the year.
Sincerely,
~-, J
; '., .(. '/. :;<, 1'1 t
( ~ ,_/L/./~ c//i.-<:"~
'-ehristy ines
Extension Agent/4-H
CV: lhd
Copies:
Board of Supervisors
City Council
Brenda Olafsen, Regional Director - VCE
LmllJ·CrW¡t Ulliversitie.~·-- The Commorlll'('(¡fth Is Our Call1pll.l
El"tellsioll is ajoillt program (II" Virgil11i1 Tech, Virgillia State Ulliversity. the U.S. Departmellt ol"Agriculll/re, alld state alld local glll'ermllt'lIts.
Virginia Coop~rJtive Extension progra~11s and employment :u:e open to all. reg.ardless of ra.~c, \.:o.lor. religion. sex, age,
\'~teran ;.Iatu-", natiun;]1 urigin, di,,;:.¡billl) , III po!itil.:al affìlia{wlI. An equal upportunil)/aIlÜmJ.tJvc al,.:{¡oll cmployer.